T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T KA R E E M L AMARB R OWN, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. J . KA VA NA UG H, L t . ; M. GA R C I A, O ff i ce r, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 16310 D . C . N o . 1 : 0 8 - c v - 0 1 7 6 4 - O WW S MS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia O l i ve rW . W ange r , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A ugus t10, 2010 ** B efo re: H A W K IN S , M cK E O W N , an dIK U T A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. K ar e e m L am arB r ow n, aC a l i f orni as t a t e pr i s one r , appe a l s pr o s e f r om the d i s tr i c tc o u rt ’ s j u d g me n td i s mi s s i n g u n d e rth e s c r e e n i n g p r o v i s i o n s o f 2 8 U . S. C. § 1 9 1 5 ( e ) h is 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n a lle g in g r e ta lia tio n f o rf ilin g in m a te ap p e a ls 

# FI LED AU G 26 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 16310 2 and r e l a t e d c l a i m s . W e have j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de n o v o . B arr e n v . H

arr i ngton , 1 5 2 F .3 d1 1 9 3 , 1 1 9 4 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 8 ) ( o r d e r ) . W e a f f i rm i n part , r e ve r s e i n part , and r e m and. T h e d i s tr i c tc o u rte rr e di n d i s m i s s i n g th e r e t a l i a t i o n c l a i m b e c au s e B r o wn id e n tif ie dr e ta lia to rya c ts th a t a f f e c te do n lyth e c o n d itio n s o f h is c o n f in e m e n t, se e R a m i rez v. G a la za , 3 3 4 F .3 d8 5 0 , 8 5 6 & n .5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) ( e x p la in in g th a t a § 1983 a c t i on i s the pr ope rr e m e dyf oras t a t e pr i s one r ’ s c ha l l e nge t o the c ondi t i ons o f h i s c o n f i n e me n t ) , a s w e l l a s c o mp l a i n i n g ab o u tth e r e v o c a t i o n o f h i s g o o d - t i me an dw o rk - tim e c r e d its , w h ic h c an n o t b e th e b a s is o f a§ 1 9 8 3 c la im . Se e E dw ards v . B al is ok, 5 2 0 U .S . 6 4 1 , 6 4 6 - 4 8 ( 1 9 9 7 ) ( b arr in g a§ 1 9 8 3 c la im th a t w o u ld , if su ccessfu l , “ n ecessarily i m p l y th e i n v al i d i ty o f th e d ep ri v at i o n o f [a p ri so n er’ s] g o o d - t i me c r e d i t s ” ) . Th e r e f o r e w e r e v e r s e th e d i s mi s s a l o f th e r e t a l i a t i o n c l a i m, an dr e m an df

o rf u rth e rp r o c e e d in g s c o n s is te n t w ith th is d is p o s itio n . W e a f f irm th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s d is m is s a l o f a ll c la im s o th e rth an r e ta lia tio n . See Sm i th v. M

a rsh , 19 4 F . 3d 10 45 , 10 52 (9th C i r. 19 99 ) ( “ [A ] rgum ent s notra i se d by a party i n i t s openi ng bri ef ar e dee m ed w ai ved. ”) . B r o w n s h a ll b e arh is o w n c o s ts o n ap p e a l. AF F I RME D i n p a r t , RE V E RS E D i n p a r t , a n d RE MAND E D.