alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER



PURSUANT TO RULE 13a  14(a) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED



I, Brent M. Cook, certify that:



1. I have reviewed
this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Raser Technologies, Inc., (the Registrant);



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting.



5. The Registrants other certifying
officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):



(a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to aversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                |  |  |  |                        
|--------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                |  | 
|August 12, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Brent M. Cook      
|(Date)          |  |  |  | Brent M. Cook,         
|                |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
### §3101. Effect of rules of court—(Rule)

#### See Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

Rules generally applicable throughout United States, Rule 54.

Acts of Congress superseded, Rule 41(g).

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 819.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Rule 41(g), referred to in text, was relettered 41(h) by 1972 amendment eff. Oct. 1, 1972.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7620]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Interim Change to the Military Freight Traffic Unified Rules 
Publication (MFTURP) No. 1

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

SUMMARY: The Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command 
(SDDC) is providing notice that it is releasing the new version of the 
MFTURP No. 1, effective April 1, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments to Publication and Rules Manager, Strategic 
Business Directorate, Business Services, 1 Soldier Way, Building 1900W, 
Attn: SDDC-OPM, Scott AFB 62225. Request for additional information may 
be sent by e-mail to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a1c2c9c0c58fd58fd1d3c8d7c4d5d5e1d4d28fc0d3ccd88fccc8cd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="33505b52571d471d43415a455647477346401d52415e4a1d5e5a5f">[email protected]</span></a> or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fa99958883d49e9f9b8895969cba8f89d49b889783d4979396"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="96f5f9e4efb8f2f3f7e4f9faf0d6e3e5b8f7e4fbefb8fbfffa">[email protected]</span></a> or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8fe8eae0fde8eaa1eee3e6eacffafca1eefde2f6a1e2e6e3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f196949e839694df909d9894b18482df90839c88df9c989d">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Chad Privett, (618) 220-6901, or 
Mr. Cory Dearolf, (618) 220-6959, or Mr. George Alie, (618) 220-5870.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Reference: Military Freight Traffic Unified Rules Publications 
(MFTURP) No. 1.
    Background: The MFTURP No. 1 governs the purchase of surface 
freight transportation in the Continental United States (CONUS) by DoD 
using Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) exempt transportation 
service contracts.
    Miscellaneous: This publication, as well as the other SDDC 
publications, can be accessed via the SDDC Web site at: http://sddcbiz.sddc.army.mil/Public/Global%20Cargo%20Distribution/Domestic/Publications?summary=fullcontent.


Larry L. Earick,
Chief, SDDC, G9, Business Services.
[FR Doc. 2011-7620 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 686

 673

 677

 677

 675

 682

 692

 732

 747

 764

 749

 714

 705

 724

 742

 740

 728

 761

 770

 772

 778

 786

 784

 798

 773

 754

 757

 758

 764

 767

 770

 665

 656

 669

 667

 658

 659

 654

 658

 731

 740

 712

 681

 668

 680

 726

 720

 713

 721

 757

 760

 763

 778

 770

 775

 741

 743

 745

 751

 755

 757

 759

 678

 666

 673

 673

 667

 669

 679

 701

 737

 752

 733

 700

 685

 696

 737

 734

 722

 747

 762

 765

 769

 782

 776

 786

 759

 749

 750

 755

 761

 762

 763

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 8, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 435

 428

 432

 432

 428

 429

 436

 449

 471

 481

 469

 449

 439

 446

 471

 470

 462

 478

 487

 489

 491

 499

 496

 502

 485

 479

 480

 483

 486

 487

 488

TOTAL 22,588

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
Erika L. Morabito (VA Bar No. 44369)

Brittany J. Nelson (VA Bar No. 81734)

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP

1300 I Street, NW, Suite 900

Washington, DC 20005

Telephone: (202) 538-8000

Email: erikamorabito@quinnemanuel.com

brittanynelson@quinnemanuel.com

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

RICHMOND DIVISION

In re:

LeClairRyan, PLLC,1

Debtor.

Case No. 19-34574-KRH

Chapter 7

NOTICE OF INCREASE OF THE HOURLY RATES OF PROFESSIONALS

Pursuant to the Order Authorizing the Retention and Employment of Quinn 

Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP as Special Counsel [Docket No. 936] (the “Retention 

Order”), Quinn Emanuel (“Quinn”) hereby submits this notice of rate increase. 

1. Pursuant to its internal operating procedures, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & 

Sullivan, LLP revisits and adjusts the rates of its professionals annually. In accordance with the 

Trustee’s Application to Retain and Employ Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP as 

Special Counsel [Docket No. 908], billing rates of Quinn’s professionals will increase on 

September 1, 2022. The new rates for the Quinn professionals primarily working on this matter 

are set forth below:

1

 The principal address of the Debtor as of the petition date was 4405 Cox Road, Glen Allen, Virginia 23060, and 

the last four digits of the Debtor’s federal tax identification number are 2451.

Case 19-34574-KRH Doc 1498 Filed 07/18/22 Entered 07/18/22 17:17:26 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
2

Timekeeper

Rate Effective September 1, 

2022

Erika Morabito $1685.00

Dave M. Grable $1525.00

Bennett Murphy $1395.00

Matthew R. Scheck $1395.00

Brittany Nelson $1320.00

Isabel Peraza $955.00

Daniel Loud $890.00

Connie Kim 455.00

2. Further, in the Engagement Letter (as defined in the Retention Order), Quinn has 

agreed to a courtesy discount of 10% off these published rates. 

3. Thus, pursuant to the Engagement Letter (as defined in the Retention Order), 

Quinn is providing thirty (30) calendar days’ notice to the Trustee in addition to filing this notice 

with the Court. The foregoing rates will become effective on September 1, 2022. 

Dated: July 18, 2022

Richmond, Virginia

/s/ Erika L. Morabito

Erika L. Morabito (VA Bar No. 44369)

Brittany J. Nelson (VA Bar No. 81734)

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP

1300 I Street, NW, Suite 900

Washington, DC 20005

Telephone: (202) 538-8000

Email: erikamorabito@quinnemanuel.com

brittanynelson@quinnemanuel.com

Case 19-34574-KRH Doc 1498 Filed 07/18/22 Entered 07/18/22 17:17:26 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on July 18, 2022, a copy of the foregoing Notice of Increase of the 

Hourly Rates of Professionals was filed and served via the Court’s Electronic Case Filing System 

on all parties receiving such notification.

/s/ Erika L. Morabito

Erika L. Morabito

Case 19-34574-KRH Doc 1498 Filed 07/18/22 Entered 07/18/22 17:17:26 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3
(No. 77-CC-2108

#### David Lawrence, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed January 10,1979.*

*737Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois State Penitentiary at Pontiac, Illinois, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of his personal property which he alleges were legally confiscated during a shakedown on April 27, 1977. Claimant alleges that authorities at the Pontiac Correctional Center illegally confiscated two stereo speakers and a pair of tennis shoes. Claimant values the speakers at $60.00, and the tennis shoes at $35.00. Claimant also seeks $95.00 in damages for replacement of a damaged phonograph.

The Court has carefully considered the transcript of evidence taken before a Commissioner of this Court. The evidence establishes that the speakers in question were taken from a fellow resident, and not from Claimant himself. It was a prison rule that personal items may not be loaned to fellow prisoners, or they become subject to confiscation as contraband. The prisoner to whom Claimant loaned the speakers had no permit for them, and they were properly confiscated.

The tennis shoes taken from Claimant’s cell were not contraband, and should have been returned to him after the shakedown.

The phonograph in question is in the possession of the Claimant, but he seeks damages for its repair. The record is unclear as to who damaged the phonograph, but it does appear that it was not damaged by Claimant, and that the damage occurred during the shakedown.

In view of the foregoing, the Court finds that Claimant is entitled to reimbursement for his loss of his tennis shoes. The Court finds he is not entitled to reimbursement for damage to his phonograph, or for confiscation of his speakers.

*738It is therefore ordered that Claimant be, and hereby is, awarded the sum of $35.00.
Documents


    Loan
      Agreement and Promissory Note

    


    This
      Loan
      Agreement and Promissory Note is made this 1st
      day of
      May 2007, by and among Media Sentiment, Inc. a corporation organized under
      the
      laws of the State of Nevada (hereinafter known as “BORROWER”) and 

    


    Tunde
      Munz-Abraham 

    (hereinafter
      known as “LENDER”).

    


    PROMISSORY
      NOTE

    


    FOR
      VALUE
      RECEIVED, BORROWER, promises to pay to the order of LENDER, the sum of
      $85,000.00 together with interest at an annual rate of 10% or $8,500.00 for
      12
      months. 

    The
      entire outstanding Loan Amount (including principal and interest) shall be
      fully
      paid by BORROWER to LENDER, or any subsequent assignee of this Notes, as
      follows:

    


    Starting
      on June 1, 2007 and at any time thereafter, Lender has the option to demand
      that
      the Loan Amount (including principal and interest) be paid in cash or, in lieu
      of cash, Lender may request to be paid in 8,500,000 shares of common stock
      of
      Media Sentiment, Inc, as payment in full for all amounts due for principal
      and
      interest under the loan agreement. The shares shall be non dilutive with respect
      to the total of 3,640,440 currently outstanding shares of Media Sentiment,
      Inc.
      Lender understands that the common shares may not be registered; therefore
      they
      may not be tradable immediately. If Lender wishes to exercise the option of
      repayment of the Loan amount in shares, Lender shall inform the company in
      writing of their decision to exercise the option.

    


    Method
      of
      Repayment:

    BORROWER
      shall pay off the loan (including principal and interest) under this agreement
      by sending a check or stock certificates in case the option to convert is
      exercised, to:

    


    Tunde
      Munz-Abraham 

    


    531
      Buchanan Street, San Francisco, California 94102

    


    If
      LENDER
      gives written notice that a different address should be used for making the
      payment to pay off this loan, BORROWER shall use the new address so given by
      LENDER.

    


    This
      Agreement should be interpreted under and governed by the laws of the State
      of
      California.

    


    In
      WITNESS WHEREOF and acknowledging acceptance and agreement of the foregoing,
      the
      BORROWER and LENDER affix their signatures hereto.

    


    BORROWER      LENDER

    Media
      Sentiment, Inc.     Tunde
      Munz-Abraham

    


    


    By
      /s/
      Marian Munz      /s/
      Tunde Munz-Abraham

    Its
      President and CEO
(No. 75-CC-0361

#### Walter L. Scoggins, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 1, 1979.*

Polos, C. J.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated.

On March 13,1974, Claimant was transferred from the Menard Correctional Center to the Joliet Correctional Center. During this transfer, some of Claimant’s personal property was lost through no fault of his own, including one Panasonic Radio valued at $20.00. Upon his return to Menard Correctional Center on April 30, 1974, a Norelco electric shaver valued at $20.00 was lost through no fault of Claimant.

In addition, Claimant has established that four *549personal photographs, which he valued at $10.00 each, were lost while in the possession of the Department of Corrections.

This Court has often held that the State of Illinois holds the duty to use reasonable care in safeguarding the property of inmate’s, when that property is placed in its possession as a bailee. Claimant has established that the foregoing items of property were in the actual physical possession of the State of Illinois when they were lost. A presumption therefore arises that Respondent was negligent in maintaining Claimant’s property, and Respondent has come forward with no evidence to rebut that presumption.

It is therefore ordered that Claimant be, and hereby is, awarded the sum of $80.00.
#### § 603.21 Publication of list.

Periodically the Secretary will publish a list in the Federal Register of the State agencies which he determines to be reliable authorities as to the quality of public postsecondary vocational education in their respective States.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1087-1(b))
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 00-51051

Summary Calendar

MARIA CAMACHO CASTRUITA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

THE ARBORETUM GROUP, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

*******************************************************

______________________________

No. 00-51096

Summary Calendar

MARIA CAMACHO CASTRUITA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

THE ARBORETUM GROUP, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

2

Appeals from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas

(A-00-CV-60-JN)

June 14, 2001

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This is a suit between an employee/plaintiff, Maria Camacho

Castruita (“Castruita”), and her employer/defendant, The Arboretum

Group, Inc. (“Arboretum”), over benefits and remedies over an

occupational injury sustained by Castruita during the course of her

employment by Arboretum. When she started to work at Arboretum,

Castruita voluntarily elected to participate in Arboretum’s ERISAQualified Occupational Injury Benefit Plan (the “Plan”) which

contained a waiver of her common law right to suit in exchange for

eligibility under the Plan. Subsequently, Castruita sustained an

injury and made claim for, accepted, and retained benefits under

the Plan. Thereafter, she sued Arboretum in state court on a

common law negligence claim. Arboretum answered claiming

peremption under ERISA and removed to federal court. Both sides

moved for summary judgment and their motions were referred to the

magistrate judge for report and recommendation. Both parties filed

motions for sanctions against the other party and such motions were

also referred to the magistrate judge for report and
3

recommendation. After de novo review of the magistrate’s report

and recommendations, the district judge granted summary judgment in

favor of Arboretum and denied Arboretum’s motion for sanctions but

granted Castruita’s motion for sanctions in the amount of $500.

Castruita filed a timely notice of appeal as to the grant of

summary judgment in favor of Arboretum (No. 00-51051) and Arboretum

filed a notice of appeal as to the grant of sanctions in favor of

Castruita (No. 00-51096). Both appeals were consolidated by

agreement in this Court.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts,

the reply briefs, and relevant portions of the record in each

appeal. For the reasons stated by the magistrate judge in his

report and recommendations, which were adopted by the district

judge, we affirm the final judgment entered in this case by the

district court.

AFFIRMED.
§ 33.46 Compromise or settlement. ( a ) Parties may make offers of compromise or settlement at any time. (Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3809)
( b ) The reviewing official has the exclusive authority to compromise or settle a case under this part at any time after the date on which the reviewing official is permitted to issue a complaint and before the date on which the ALJ issues an initial decision. (Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3803(j))
( c ) The Department head has exclusive authority to compromise or settle a case under this part at any time after the date on which the ALJ issues an initial decision, except during the pendency of any review under § 33.42 or during the pendency of any action to collect penalties and assessments under § 33.43. (Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3803(i)(2)(C))
( d ) The Attorney General has exclusive authority to compromise or settle a case under this part during the pendency of any review under § 33.42 or of any action to recover penalties and assessments under 31 U.S.C. 3806. (Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3806(f))
( e ) The investigating official may recommend settlement terms to the reviewing official, the Department head, or the Attorney General, as appropriate. The reviewing official may recommend settlement terms to the Department head, or the Attorney General, as appropriate. (Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3809)
( f ) Any compromise or settlement must be in writing.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3809)
(No. 76-CC-1707

#### Roy D. Spenard, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 10, 1979.*

Polos, C.J.

This is an action by an inmate of an Illinois Correctional facility to recover the value of certain items of personal property, which he alleges were lost during the course of his transfer between the Pontiac Correctional Center and the Menard Correctional Center.

A hearing was held before a Commissioner of this Court on October 10, 1978. The Court has carefully considered the matters introduced into evidence, and finds that Claimant has failed to substantiate his claim by preponderance of the evidence.

It is therefore ordered that this claim be, and hereby is, denied.
#### Maria S. Halstead, Sometimes Known as Rita S. Halstead, Respondent, v. George W. Halstead, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, without costs. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 676

 671

 684

 715

 720

 713

 705

 731

 718

 704

 717

 704

 737

 735

 724

 723

 701

 699

 688

 690

 653

 664

 682

 711

 703

 617

 688

 740

 488

 488

 487

 476

 478

 483

 478

 490

 475

 479

 473

 467

 474

 457

 468

 448

 463

 457

 453

 455

 441

 444

 443

 448

 449

 425

 428

 427

 547

 541

 558

 575

 566

 570

 562

 589

 563

 555

 571

 560

 602

 576

 572

 552

 555

 559

 546

 555

 524

 517

 545

 564

 540

 487

 575

 527

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 8, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 354

 350

 361

 371

 366

 368

 363

 380

 364

 359

 369

 362

 388

 372

 369

 357

 359

 361

 353

 359

 340

 336

 353

 365

 350

 317

 371

 342

TOTAL 15,553

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 525

 537

 549

 625

 594

 578

 577

 588

 588

 589

 567

 572

 572

 565

 591

 549

 552

 542

 529

 536

 555

 548

 509

 565

 545

 540

 572

 604

 577

 584

 569

 439

 453

 442

 487

 470

 478

 476

 488

 476

 479

 458

 485

 511

 507

 470

 460

 511

 469

 448

 448

 443

 430

 414

 410

 457

 473

 517

 508

 501

 485

 502

 484

 489

 495

 541

 522

 524

 522

 521

 511

 515

 518

 525

 543

 537

 532

 513

 530

 515

 498

 500

 492

 485

 468

 487

 493

 510

 545

 550

 546

 535

 533

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 19, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 315

 318

 322

 350

 339

 340

 339

 338

 332

 334

 336

 340

 352

 348

 345

 333

 344

 334

 324

 325

 320

 316

 305

 317

 321

 331

 353

 356

 353

 347

 345

TOTAL 15,979

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21