alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean TDS

1 240 211 224 154

2 228 214 221 153

3 230 219 224 154

4 239 218 226 156

5 247 211 227 156

6 268 215 231 159

7 276 217 235 161

8 280 216 237 162

9 290 218 239 164

10 293 214 239 164

11 289 214 240 164

12 291 224 246 168

13 281 224 244 167

14 283 225 244 167

15 276 222 242 166

16 261 216 235 161

17 279 207 238 163

18 0 0 0 16

19 265 224 243 166

20 276 214 239 164

21 279 205 234 161

22 288 204 242 166

23 284 224 246 168

24 276 210 241 165

25 281 222 242 166

26 280 220 244 167

27 273 232 249 170

28 256 225 243 166

29 251 232 242 166

30 362 225 257 175

Total 6914

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Headworks

Period: September 2023 Run Date: 10/6/2023
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Timothy E. Bixby, Chief Financial Officer of LivePerson, Inc. (the “Company”),
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           
the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      May 10, 2010
                  By:
                  /s/ TIMOTHY
      E. BIXBYName:
                  Timothy
      E. BixbyTitle:
                  President
      and Chief Financial
Officer





This
certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except
to the extent the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 5,511

 5,977

 6,382

 6,831

 7,238

 7,201

 6,151

 5,636

 5,409

 6,019

 6,703

 8,048

 7,497

 7,243

 7,451

 7,397

 7,212

 6,543

 6,545

 6,670

 7,031

 5,920

 5,320

 5,953

 4,664

 4,508

 2,353

 3,427

 3,789

 3,658

 706

 530

 782

 859

 707

 727

 981

 488

 626

 1,120

 1,591

 1,857

 1,370

 1,411

 973

 610

 1,231

 502

 758

 592

 521

 893

 325

 994

 499

 460

 367

 400

 483

 442

 2,987

 3,165

 3,292

 3,550

 3,850

 3,825

 3,333

 3,129

 3,310

 3,640

 4,248

 4,739

 4,452

 3,959

 3,851

 3,945

 3,735

 3,515

 3,723

 3,717

 3,895

 3,905

 2,716

 3,475

 2,070

 1,299

 798

 960

 1,266

 1,093

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 18, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 45,897

 45,355

 44,484

 43,878

 43,815

 44,613

 45,299

 45,665

 45,822

 46,218

 47,466

 49,398

 50,671

 51,479

 52,343

 53,123

 53,566

 53,531

 53,404

 53,296

 53,858

 54,634

 54,040

 53,875

 51,697

 48,257

 44,603

 41,604

 39,019

 36,167

 3,278

 3,240

 3,177

 3,134

 3,130

 3,187

 3,236

 3,262

 3,273

 3,301

 3,390

 3,528

 3,619

 3,677

 3,739

 3,795

 3,826

 3,824

 3,815

 3,807

 3,847

 3,902

 3,860

 3,848

 3,693

 3,447

 3,186

 2,972

 2,787

 2,583

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 658.31 What selection criteria does the Secretary use? The Secretary evaluates an application for a project under this program on the basis of the criteria in this section. ( a ) *Plan of operation.* (See 34 CFR 655. 31(a))
( b ) *Quality of key personnel.* (See 34 CFR 655.31(b))
( c ) *Budget and cost effectiveness.* (See 34 CFR 655.31(c))
( d ) *Evaluation plan.* (See 34 CFR 655.31(d))
( e ) *Adequacy of resources.* (See 34 CFR 655.31(e))
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1124)
[47 FR 14122, Apr. 1, 1982, as amended at 70 FR 13375, Mar. 21, 2005]
#### § 76.684 Severability.

If any provision of this subpart or its application to any person, act, or practice is held invalid, the remainder of the subpart or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or practice shall not be affected thereby.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3, 3474)

[85 FR 59980, Sept. 23, 2020]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), Henry J. Fuchs, M.D., the
President and Chief Executive Officer of IntraBiotics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company"), and David J. Tucker the Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:

1.    The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Periodic
Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
periods covered by the Periodic Report and the results of operations of the
Company for the periods covered by the Periodic Report.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates and shall not
be deemed "filed" by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference
into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after
the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 13th
day of August, 2004.

/s/ Henry J. Fuchs                                   /s/ David J. Tucker
------------------                                   -------------------
Henry J. Fuchs, M.D.                                 David J. Tucker
President and Chief Executive Officer                Principal Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to IntraBiotics
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by IntraBiotics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
### §1035. False statements relating to health care matters

(a) Whoever, in any matter involving a health care benefit program, knowingly and willfully—

(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; or

(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any materially false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry,

in connection with the delivery of or payment for health care benefits, items, or services, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

(b) As used in this section, the term "health care benefit program" has the meaning given such term in section 24(b) of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 104–191, title II, §244(a), Aug. 21, 1996, 110 Stat. 2017.)
### [§281. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–106, div. D, title XLIII, §4304(b)(3), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 664; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §602(d), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3503]

Section, added Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title VIII, §822(b)(1), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1132, related to restrictions on retired military officers regarding certain matters affecting the Government.

Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §602(d), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3503, which repealed this section, was repealed by Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, §4002(c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1808, effective Oct. 11, 1996.

A prior section 281, acts June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 697; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §6, 63 Stat. 90, which related to compensation to Members of Congress, officers and others in matters affecting the Government, was repealed by Pub. L. 87–849, §§2, 4, Oct. 23, 1962, 76 Stat. 1126, eff. 90 days after Oct. 23, 1962, which repeal continued limited applicability to retired officers of the Armed Forces of the United States. Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title VIII, §822(a), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1132, repealed such prior section 281 to the extent that it had not been repealed by section 2 of Pub. L. 87–849. See section 203 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

For effective date and applicability of repeal by Pub. L. 104–106, see section 4401 of Pub. L. 104–106, set out as an Effective Date of 1996 Amendment note under section 2220 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 982

 505

 489

 480

 483

 483

 480

 479

 479

 479

 477

 476

 472

 469

 1,041

 1,038

 1,105

 1,119

 1,033

 907

 841

 765

 632

 578

 590

 589

 632

 511

 425

 429

 336

 484

 474

 474

 477

 476

 477

 461

 475

 475

 474

 471

 465

 463

 461

 525

 577

 579

 611

 608

 560

 524

 445

 422

 381

 361

 324

 292

 277

 283

 507

 498

 483

 477

 480

 480

 479

 477

 477

 477

 476

 474

 469

 466

 771

 856

 874

 857

 808

 746

 682

 600

 506

 489

 431

 428

 401

 347

 316

 328

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:June 25, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 329

 324

 314

 311

 313

 313

 312

 311

 311

 311

 310

 309

 306

 304

 492

 545

 556

 546

 515

 477

 437

 387

 329

 318

 282

 281

 264

 230

 211

 219

TOTAL 16,160

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 860

 908

 886

 933

 960

 915

 947

 873

 971

 901

 973

 969

 955

 913

 894

 917

 913

 888

 902

 842

 860

 846

 833

 833

 828

 825

 829

 820

 814

 811

 837

 846

 846

 859

 867

 856

 863

 861

 859

 875

 876

 900

 881

 891

 849

 854

 841

 843

 830

 828

 830

 822

 817

 814

 812

 815

 810

 804

 799

 796

 850

 890

 871

 922

 909

 893

 902

 866

 920

 878

 913

 911

 914

 896

 876

 908

 879

 879

 865

 835

 839

 829

 821

 820

 817

 818

 816

 808

 804

 800

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:July 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 541

 566

 554

 586

 578

 568

 573

 551

 585

 559

 580

 579

 581

 570

 557

 577

 559

 559

 551

 532

 535

 528

 523

 523

 521

 522

 520

 515

 513

 510

TOTAL 25,949

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
EXHIBIT  32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     IN  CONNECTION  WITH  THE  QUARTERLY  REPORT  OF MOUNTAIN OIL, INC. ON FORM
10-QSB  FOR  THE  PERIOD  ENDED  MARCH  31,  2004
 AS  FILED  WITH  THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON THE DATE HEREOF (THE
"REPORT"),  JOSEPH  OLLIVIER,  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND LYNN STRATFORD, CHIEF
FINANCIAL  OFFICER  OF THE COMPANY, CERTIFY, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, THAT:

     (1)     THE REPORT FULLY COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13(A) OR
15(D)  OF  THE  SECURITIES  EXCHANGE  ACT  OF  1934;  AND

     (2)     THE  INFORMATION  CONTAINED  IN  THE REPORT FAIRLY PRESENTS, IN ALL
MATERIAL  RESPECTS,  THE  FINANCIAL  CONDITION  AND  RESULT OF OPERATIONS OF THE
COMPANY.


                                                           /S/  JOSEPH  OLLIVIER
                                                           ---------------------
                                                                JOSEPH  OLLIVIER
                                       PRESIDENT  AND  CHIEF  EXECUTIVE  OFFICER


MOUNTAIN  OIL,  INC.

                                                            /S/  LYNN  STRATFORD
                                                            --------------------
                                                                 LYNN  STRATFORD
                                                       CHIEF  FINANCIAL  OFFICER
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6876

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DAVID RICH, a/k/a Oakie , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Richard D. Bennett , District Judge. ( 1:08

- cr - 00438

- RDB

- 1; 1:17

- cv - 03731

- RDB )

Submitted : September 13, 2018 Decided: September 18, 2018

Before NIEMEYER and KING , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. David Rich, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: David Rich seeks to appe al the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealabilit y will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322,
336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural ground s, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at
484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and con clude that Rich has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Rich’s motion to place the appeal in abeyance for another appeal pending with this court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
§ 692.2 Who is eligible to participate in the LEAP Program? ( a ) *State participation.* A State that meets the requirements in §§ 692.20 and 692.21 is eligible to receive payments under the LEAP program.
( b ) *Student participation.* A student must meet the requirements of § 692.40 to be eligible to receive assistance from a State under the LEAP program.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070c-1)
[52 FR 45433, Nov. 27, 1987, as amended at 65 FR 38729, June 22, 2000]
## San Joaquin Valley, CA, PM2.5 attainment plan for th e 1997 standard (PM2.5 and NOx

budgets 2014, 2017, 2018, and 2020). Posted: September 18, 2015 How can I obtain a copy of the submission? The SIP is available for public viewing at US EPA Re gion 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA. Th e SIP is also available electronically at: 2015 San Joaquin ValleyAttainment Plan for the 1997 PM2.5 standards (2014, 2017, and 2020 budgets) and Supplement for San Joaquin Valley PM2.5 Attainment Plan (2018 budgets) When must I submit comments? You must submit comments by October 19, 2015. Where do I submit comments? Contact: John Ungvarsky, US EPA Region 9, Air Planni ng Office, 75 Hawthorne Street, Air-2, San Francisc o, CA 94105; at 415 -972-396; fax: 415-947-3579; or ungvarsky.john@epa. gov. 

## Page 1 of 1 SIP Submissions Currently Under EPA Adequacy Review | State and Local Transport ation Reso ...

2/ 9/ 2016 http://www3.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/currsips.htm
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Aqua Mfg. Co., Inc., and H. Warshow & Sons, Inc.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
### §669. Theft or embezzlement in connection with health care

(a) Whoever knowingly and willfully embezzles, steals, or otherwise without authority converts to the use of any person other than the rightful owner, or intentionally misapplies any of the moneys, funds, securities, premiums, credits, property, or other assets of a health care benefit program, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both; but if the value of such property does not exceed the sum of $100 the defendant shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(b) As used in this section, the term "health care benefit program" has the meaning given such term in section 24(b) of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 104–191, title II, §243(a), Aug. 21, 1996, 110 Stat. 2017.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 751

 798

 768

 772

 786

 817

 628

 618

 578

 434

 368

 309

 307

 309

 583

 825

 818

 812

 822

 788

 815

 833

 854

 838

 844

 829

 815

 836

 839

 828

 838

 390

 235

 236

 228

 231

 202

 191

 198

 154

 166

 161

 159

 174

 196

 214

 255

 269

 277

 306

 329

 334

 358

 360

 359

 380

 393

 413

 431

 429

 447

 482

 625

 480

 435

 432

 434

 378

 355

 355

 258

 255

 238

 233

 240

 252

 312

 462

 484

 459

 471

 473

 481

 514

 536

 532

 535

 538

 552

 564

 585

 594

 669

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:February 2, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 402

 313

 285

 283

 284

 250

 235

 235

 175

 174

 163

 160

 164

 172

 209

 302

 315

 300

 307

 308

 313

 334

 347

 345

 347

 348

 357

 365

 378

 383

 429

TOTAL 13,731

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
Summary: Oil and Gas Company Paid Federal Royalties as 

Required 

Report Date: June 18, 2020 Report Number: 19-0783 

The OIG investigated reports that an oil and gas company in Idaho was underpaying natural gas 

royalties. 

We found the company operated Federal mineral leases in Idaho and paid Federal royalties to the 

Office of Natural Resources Revenue (ONRR) as required. Because we did not uncover royalty 

fraud involving Federal minerals, we concluded our investigation. 

This is a summary of an investigative report we issued to the ONRR Director. 

Office of Investigations | Office of Inspector General | U.S. Department of the Interior | Washington, DC
§ 34.14 Burden of proof. ( a ) ( 1 ) We have the burden of proving the existence and amount of a debt.
( 2 ) We meet this burden by including in the record and making available to the debtor on request records that show that— ( i ) The debt exists in the amount stated in the garnishment notice; and
( ii ) The debt is currently delinquent.
( b ) If you dispute the existence or amount of the debt, you must prove by a preponderance of the credible evidence that— ( 1 ) No debt exists;
( 2 ) The amount we claim to be owed on the debt is incorrect, or
( 3 ) You are not delinquent with respect to the debt.
( c ) ( 1 ) If you object that the proposed garnishment rate would cause financial hardship, you bear the burden of proving by a preponderance of the credible evidence that withholding the amount of wages proposed in the notice would leave you unable to meet the basic living expenses of you and your dependents.
( 2 ) The standards for proving financial hardship are those in § 34.24.
( d ) ( 1 ) If you object on the ground that applicable law bars us from collecting the debt by garnishment at this time, you bear the burden of proving the facts that would establish that claim.
( 2 ) Examples of applicable law that may prevent collection by garnishment include the automatic stay in bankruptcy (11 U.S.C. 362(a)), and the preclusion of garnishment action against a debtor who was involuntarily separated from employment and has been reemployed for less than a continuous period of 12 months (31 U.S.C. 3720D(b)(6)).
( e ) The fact that applicable law may limit the amount that an employer may withhold from your pay to less than the amount or rate we state in the garnishment order does not bar us from issuing the order.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3720D)
### §2236. Searches without warrant

Whoever, being an officer, agent, or employee of the United States or any department or agency thereof, engaged in the enforcement of any law of the United States, searches any private dwelling used and occupied as such dwelling without a warrant directing such search, or maliciously and without reasonable cause searches any other building or property without a search warrant, shall be fined under this title for a first offense; and, for a subsequent offense, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

This section shall not apply to any person—

(a) serving a warrant of arrest; or

(b) arresting or attempting to arrest a person committing or attempting to commit an offense in his presence, or who has committed or is suspected on reasonable grounds of having committed a felony; or

(c) making a search at the request or invitation or with the consent of the occupant of the premises.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 803; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §601(a)(8), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3498; Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, §4002(d)(1)(C)(iii), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1809.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §53a (Aug. 27, 1935, ch. 740, §201, 49 Stat. 877).

Words "or any department or agency thereof" were inserted to avoid ambiguity as to scope of section. (See definitive section 6 of this title.)

The exception in the case of an invitation or the consent of the occupant, was inserted to make the section complete and remove any doubt as to the application of this section to searches which have uniformly been upheld.

Reference to misdemeanor was omitted in view of definitive section 1 of this title. (See reviser's note under section 212 of this title.)

Words "upon conviction thereof shall be" were omitted as surplusage, since punishment cannot be imposed until conviction is secured.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–273 inserted "under this title" after "warrant, shall be fined" and struck out "not more than $1,000" after "for a first offense".

1996—Pub. L. 104–294 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000".