alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 668.214 Participation rate index appeals. ( a ) *Eligibility.* ( 1 ) You do not lose eligibility under § 668.206(a)(1), based on one cohort default rate over 40 percent, if you bring an appeal in accordance with this section that demonstrates that your participation rate index for that cohort's fiscal year is equal to or less than 0.0832.
( 2 ) Subject to § 668.208(b), you do not lose eligibility under § 668.206(a)(2) if you bring an appeal in accordance with this section that demonstrates that your participation rate index for any of the three most recent cohorts' fiscal years is equal to or less than 0.0625.
( 3 ) Subject to § 668.208(b), you are not placed on provisional certification under § 668.16(m)(2)(i) based on two cohort default rates that fail to satisfy the standard of administrative capability in § 668.16(m)(1)(ii) if you bring an appeal in accordance with this section that demonstrates that your participation rate index for either of those two cohorts' fiscal years is equal to or less than 0.0625.
( b ) *Calculating your participation rate index.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, your participation rate index for a fiscal year is determined by multiplying your cohort default rate for that fiscal year by the percentage that is derived by dividing— ( i ) The number of students who received an FFELP or a Direct Loan Program loan to attend your institution during a period of enrollment, as defined in 34 CFR 682.200 or 685.102, that overlaps any part of a 12-month period that ended during the 6 months immediately preceding the cohort's fiscal year, by
( ii ) The number of regular students who were enrolled at your institution on at least a half-time basis during any part of the same 12-month period.
( 2 ) If your cohort default rate for a fiscal year is calculated as an average rate under § 668.202(d)(2), you may calculate your participation rate index for that fiscal year using either that average rate or the cohort default rate that would be calculated for the fiscal year alone using the method described in § 668.202(d)(1).
( c ) *Deadline for submitting an appeal.* You must send us your appeal under this section, including all supporting documentation, within 30 days after you receive— ( 1 ) Notice of your loss of eligibility; or
( 2 ) Notice under § 668.205 of a cohort default rate that equals or exceeds 30 percent but is less than or equal to 40 percent.
( d ) *Determination.* ( 1 ) You do not lose eligibility under § 668.206 and we do not place you on provisional certification, if we determine that you meet the requirements for a participation rate index appeal.
( 2 ) If we determine that your participation rate index for a fiscal year is equal to or less than 0.0832 or 0.0625, as applicable, under paragraph (d)(1) of this section, we also excuse you from any subsequent loss of eligibility under § 668.206(a)(2) or placement on provisional certification under § 668.16(m)(2)(i) that would be based on the official cohort default rate for that fiscal year.
(Authority:20 U.S.C. 1082, 1085, 1094, 1099c)
[74 FR 55651, Oct. 28, 2009, as amended at 78 FR 65804, Nov. 1, 2013; 80 FR 67236, Oct. 30, 2015]
### §1736. Restrictive use of information

(a) No information or evidence obtained by reason of compliance by a natural person with any provision of section 3010 of title 39, or regulations issued thereunder, shall, except as provided in subsection (c) of this section, be used, directly or indirectly, as evidence against that person in a criminal proceeding.

(b) The fact of the performance of any act by an individual in compliance with any provision of section 3010 of title 39, or regulations issued thereunder, shall not be deemed the admission of any fact, or otherwise be used, directly or indirectly, as evidence against that person in a criminal proceeding, except as provided in subsection (c) of this section.

(c) Subsections (a) and (b) of this section shall not preclude the use of any such information or evidence in a prosecution or other action under any applicable provision of law with respect to the furnishing of false information.

(Added Pub. L. 91–375, §6(j)(37)(A), Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 781.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on first day of sixth month which begins after Aug. 12, 1970, see section 15(b) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of Title 39, Postal Service.
----

            COUNCIL DECISION         

of 7 December 2004         

amending Article 3 of Decision 98/198/EC authorising the United Kingdom to extend application of a measure derogating from Articles 6 and 17 of the Sixth Council Directive (77/388/EEC) on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes

(2004/855/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the Sixth Council Directive (77/388/EEC) of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes – Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (1), and in particular Article 27(1) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 3 of Decision 98/198/EC shall be replaced by the following:

‘Article 3

This authorisation shall expire on the date of entry into force of Community rules determining what expenditure relating to motorised road vehicles is not to be eligible for full deduction of value added tax, but on 31 December 2007 at the latest.’

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Done at Brussels, 7 December 2004.

For the Council

The President

G. ZALM            

----

(1)OJ L 145, 13.6.1977, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Directive 2004/66/EC (OJ L 168, 1.5.2004, p. 35).

(2)OJ L 159, 11.7.1995, p. 19.

(3)OJ L 76, 13.3.1998 p. 31. Decision as last amended by Decision 2003/909/EC (OJ L 342, 30.12.2003, p. 49).

----
§ 75.110 Information regarding performance measurement. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70321 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) The Secretary may establish in an application notice for a competition one or more performance measurement requirements, including requirements for performance measures, baseline data, or performance targets, and a requirement that applicants propose in their applications one or more of their own performance measures, baseline data, or performance targets.
( b ) If an application notice requires applicants to propose project-specific performance measures, baseline data, or performance targets, the application must include the following, as required by the application notice: ( 1 ) *Performance measures.* How each proposed performance measure would accurately measure the performance of the project and how the proposed performance measure would be consistent with the performance measures established for the program funding the competition.
( 2 ) *Baseline data.* ( i ) Why each proposed baseline is valid; or
( ii ) If the applicant has determined that there are no established baseline data for a particular performance measure, an explanation of why there is no established baseline and of how and when, during the project period, the applicant would establish a valid baseline for the performance measure.
( 3 ) *Performance targets.* Why each proposed performance target is ambitious yet achievable compared to the baseline for the performance measure and when, during the project period, the applicant would meet the performance target(s).
( c ) If the application notice establishes performance measurement requirements, the applicant must also describe in the application— ( 1 ) ( i ) The data collection and reporting methods the applicant would use and why those methods are likely to yield reliable, valid, and meaningful performance data; and
( ii ) If the Secretary requires applicants to collect data after the substantive work of a project is complete regarding the attainment of certain performance targets, the data collection and reporting methods the applicant would use during the post-performance period and why those methods are likely to yield reliable, valid, and meaningful performance data.
( 2 ) The applicant's capacity to collect and report reliable, valid, and meaningful performance data, as evidenced by high-quality data collection, analysis, and reporting in other projects or research.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
[78 FR 49352, Aug. 13, 2013]
§ 222.72 How does the Secretary determine whether a fiscally dependent local educational agency meets the applicable tax rate requirement? ( a ) If an LEA is fiscally dependent, as defined in § 222.2(c), the Secretary compares the LEA's imputed local tax rate, calculated under paragraph (b) of this section, with the average tax rate of its generally comparable LEAs, calculated under paragraph (c) of this section, to determine whether the LEA meets the applicable tax rate requirement.
( b ) The Secretary imputes a local tax rate for a fiscally dependent LEA by— ( 1 ) Dividing the assessed value of each classification of real property within the boundaries of the general government by the percentage of true value assigned to that property for tax purposes and aggregating the results;
( 2 ) Determining the amount of locally derived revenues made available by the general government for the LEA's current expenditures (as defined in section 8013); and
( 3 ) Dividing the amount determined in paragraph (b)(2) of this section by the amount determined in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( c ) The Secretary performs the computations in paragraph (b) of this section for each of the fiscally dependent generally comparable LEAs and the computations in §§ 222.68 through 222.71, whichever is applicable, for each of the fiscally independent generally comparable LEAs and determines the average of all those tax rates.
( d ) The Secretary determines that a fiscally dependent LEA described in § 222.63(b) or § 222.64(a) meets the applicable tax rate requirement if its imputed local tax rate is equal to at least 95 percent of the average tax rate of its generally comparable LEAs.
( e ) The Secretary determines that a fiscally dependent LEA described in § 222.63(c) meets the applicable tax rate requirement if its imputed local tax rate is equal to at least 125 percent of the average tax rate of its generally comparable LEAs.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7703(b)(2))
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER



PURSUANT TO RULE 13a  14(a) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED



I, Brent M. Cook, certify that:



1. I have reviewed
this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Raser Technologies, Inc., (the Registrant);



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting.



5. The Registrants other certifying
officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):



(a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to aversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                  |  |  |  |                        
|----------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                  |  | 
|November 14, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Brent M. Cook      
|(Date)            |  |  |  | Brent M. Cook,         
|                  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 05038**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  05038\05038_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 05038\05038_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05038\05038_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05038\05038_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05038\05038_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05038\05038_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

05038\Certification Statement Plant ID 05038.pdf Plant certification statement x 05038\Supplemental Documents\05038_A5-2 Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05038\Supplemental Documents\05038_A5-3 WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05038\Supplemental Documents\05038_C2-31 fly ash block diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05038\Supplemental Documents\05038_D3-1 Pond-1 D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05038\Supplemental Documents\05038_Submittal Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05038\05038_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05038\05038_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### John Coyne, an Infant, by James W. Coyne, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Tidewater Building Company and Thomas B. Bryson, Appellants.

Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, upon the ground that the evidence does not establish negligence on the part of the defendants, or that plaintiff was free from contributory negligence. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Ex-12


                                                      Idaho Power Company
                                              Consolidated Financial Information
                                              Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                                                                                                                 
                                                             Twelve Months Ended December 31,                      
                                                                  (Thousands of Dollars)                         
                                                   1992         1993         1994         1995         1996          1997
<S>                                              <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>            <C>
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to
  Fixed Charges:
    Consolidated net income.....................  $59,990      $84,464      $74,930      $86,921      $90,618        $92,274

Income taxes:
    Income taxes (incl amounts charged
     to other income and deductions)............   24,601       38,057       35,307       49,498       51,316         47,559
    Investment tax credit adjustment............   (1,439)      (1,583)      (1,064)      (1,086)         776         (1,087)
          Total income taxes....................   23,162       36,474       34,243       48,412       52,092         46,472

Income before income taxes......................   83,152      120,938      109,173      135,333      142,710        138,746

Fixed Charges:
    Interest  on long-term debt.................   53,408       53,706       51,172       51,147       52,165         53,215
     expense and premium - net..................      392          507          567          567          594            653
    Interest on short-term bank loans...........      647          220        1,157        3,144        2,269          2,902
    Other interest..............................    1,011        2,023        1,538        1,598        2,319          3,990
    Interest portion of rentals.................      683        1,077          794          925          991            982

          Total fixed charges...................   56,141       57,533       55,228       57,381       58,338         61,742

Earnings  - as defined.......................... $139,293     $178,471     $164,401     $192,714     $201,048       $200,488

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges..............    2.48x        3.10x        2.98x        3.36x        3.45x          3.25x










                                                       Exhibit 12
</TABLE>
H. R. 5023 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient clinic 

in Youngstown, Ohio, as the ‘‘Carl Nunziato VA Clinic’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

Congress makes the following findings: 

(1) Carl Nunziato graduated from Youngstown State 

University ROTC as the Distinguished Military Graduate in 

1961 and commissioned into the U.S. Army. 

(2) While serving, Major (ret.) Nunziato was stationed in 

Thailand during the Laotian Crisis. Major Nunziato later 

served two voluntary tours of combat duty in Vietnam. 

(3) On his second tour, then-Captain Nunziato was severely 

injured, losing both legs from a mortar attack while protecting 

a small Vietnamese village in Soui Da. 

(4) Major Nunziato spent two years at Walter Reed Military 

Hospital recovering from his wounds. He then returned home 

to Northeastern Ohio where he enrolled in Case Western 

University Law School earning a degree in 1971. Following 

retirement from active duty, Major Nunziato continuously 

championed the rights of veterans and the disabled, while 

establishing a distinguished career in banking and finance. 

(5) Due to Major Nunziato’s tireless efforts, a Department 

of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic was established in Youngstown. Additionally, his exhaustive work throughout Mahoning 

County has brought curb cuts, wheel chair ramps and other 

accessibility measures to county public buildings, universities 

and courthouses, affording more independence to local disabled 

population. These efforts were borne from witnessing fellow 

disabled veterans denied justice and equality, after having 

fought and sacrificed for those same principles. 

SEC. 2. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS COMMUNITYBASED OUTPATIENT CLINIC, YOUNGSTOWN, OHIO. 

The Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient clinic in Youngstown, Ohio, shall, after the date of the 

enactment of this Act, be known and designated as the ‘‘Carl 

Nunziato VA Clinic’’. Any reference to such clinic in any law, 

regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United 
H. R. 5023—2 

States shall be considered to be a reference to the Carl Nunziato 

VA Clinic. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 10.14

**AMENDMENT**

               THIS AMENDMENT (the "Amendment") amends the Employment Agreement dated as of January 3, 2000 (the "EmploymentAgreement"), by and between McLAREN PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation formerly known as McLaren Automotive Group, Inc., with its principal office located at 32233 West Eight Mile Road, Livonia, Michigan 48152 (the "Corporation") and JACQUELINE K. KURTZ, an individual whose address is 1280 Sunset Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 (the "Employee").

RECITALS:

               A.      The Compensation Committee of the Corporation has determined it is in the best interestof the Corporation to increase the annual salary paid to Employee.

               B.      The Corporation and the Employee desire to amend the terms of the Employment Agreement asset forth in this Amendment to effectuate the salary increase.

               NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to the following terms:

               1.      Amendment. The first sentence of Section 4 of the Employment Agreement, entitled "Salary and Bonus," is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: "During her employment with the Corporation, the Corporation will pay Employee an annual salary of One Hundred Thirty Thousand Dollars ($130,000), payable according to theCorporation's standard payment practices."

               2.     Effective Date. This Amendment shall be effective as of July 24, 2000.

               3.     Other Terms. All of the remaining terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shallremain in full force and effect and this Amendment shall be deemed to be a part of the Employment Agreement, and the Employment Agreement shall be a part of this Amendment as if fully set forth herein.

               4.     Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of whichwill be deemed to be an original, but all of which will constitute one and the same document.

[Signatures on following page]

               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.

Compensation Committee:

 

/s/ Lawrence Cohen