alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Specimen Certificate for Ordinary Shares



 Exhibit 4.2 
 Registered Certificate No.: [                    ] 
 Giant Interactive Group Inc. 
 (Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman
Islands) 
 SHARE CERTIFICATE 
 PRINCIPAL REGISTER: THE CAYMAN ISLANDS 
 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE UNDER-MENTIONED PERSON(S) IS/ARE THE REGISTERED HOLDER(S) OF FULLY PAID
AND NONASSESSABLE ORDINARY SHARES, WITH PAR VALUE OF US$0.0000002 PER SHARE AS DETAILED BELOW IN THE CAPITAL OF THIS COMPANY, SUBJECT TO THE MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF THE COMPANY. 
 Name and 
 Address of Shareholder 
 NUMBER OF
SHARES:            -            - 
  
  
 GIVEN UNDER THE SECURITIES SEAL OF THE COMPANY ON
[                 Date                     ] 
  

	
	For and on behalf of
	Butterfield Fund Services (Cayman) Limited
	
	  
	As the Share Registrar for Giant Interactive Group Inc.

 No transfer of any of the Shares comprised in this Certificate will be recognised without the
production of this Certificate.
Exhibit 10.3




On behalf of Western Architectural Services, LLC and Voyager Entertainment
International, Inc., please consider this letter their collectively exercise of
the option to extend the terms of that certain promissory note dated September
5th, 2006 for the extension period of six (6) months.  In accord with the terms
of the note, we have enclosed payment in the amount of 3% of the unpaid
principal amount equaling $37,500.00 as the extension fee.

We appreciate your willingness to accommodate this extension.  Should there be
any questions pertaining to this matter or if you need any additional
information, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely


By: /S/ Richard L. Hannigan, Sr.
--------------------------------------
Name: Richard L. Hannigan, Sr.
Title:   President/CEO
Certificate of Amendment
                                       to
                           Articles of Incorporation
                                       of
                              SRS TECHNICAL, INC.

We, the undersigned as R.W. Wheeler, President and Kent A. Midby, Secretary,
do hereby certify:

     That the Board of Directors of SRS Technical, Inc. at a meeting duly
commenced and held on June 2, 1987, adopted a resolution to amend the original
Articles as follows:

     RESOLVED that the name of the corporation be changed to Composite Design,
Inc.

     The number of shares of the corporation outstanding and authorized to
vote an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation is 45,000,000; that said
change and amendment has been consented to and authorized by the written
consent of stockholders holding at least a majority of each class of stock
outstanding and entitled to vote thereon.

signed/s/ E.W. Wheeler,
President

Signed/s/Kent A. Midby, 
Secretary

STATE OF NEVADA)
               )SS
COUNTY OF CLARK)
/s/MICHELLE BRAZIER
On June 1, 1987, personally appeared before me
a Notary Public, E.W. Wheeler & Kent A. Midby,
who acknowledged that they executed the above
instrument.
(No. 74-CC-538

#### International Harvester Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 17, 1974.*

International Harvester Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 732

 705

 701

 700

 697

 695

 687

 686

 685

 673

 698

 678

 678

 682

 676

 646

 658

 656

 648

 660

 637

 637

 646

 647

 648

 647

 640

 644

 656

 645

 652

 689

 677

 667

 682

 669

 672

 660

 658

 655

 655

 658

 651

 654

 646

 631

 633

 632

 637

 625

 623

 618

 624

 628

 616

 619

 623

 624

 624

 630

 630

 634

 704

 692

 684

 689

 688

 681

 674

 672

 671

 662

 671

 661

 664

 668

 650

 639

 645

 644

 636

 639

 628

 630

 635

 630

 639

 637

 632

 634

 644

 638

 644

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:August 8, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 451

 444

 439

 442

 441

 437

 433

 431

 431

 425

 431

 424

 426

 429

 418

 411

 415

 414

 409

 411

 404

 405

 408

 405

 411

 410

 407

 408

 414

 410

 414

TOTAL 20,325

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
**Exhibit 21**

 

**LIST OFSUBSIDIARIES**

 

The following is a list ofsubsidiaries and Opta’s ownership percentage as of June 30, 2005:

 
| **Name of Subsidiary**                                 | ** ** | **Percentage of  Ownership** | ** ** | **State or other  Jurisdiction of  Incorporation** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| Correlant Communications,  Inc. (1)                              |       | 66                                | %          | Delaware                                                          |       |
| GoVideo DigiTech (Huizhou) Co., Ltd.                             |       | 100                               | %          | China                                                             |       |
| Lotus Pacific Communications Technology  (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (2) |       | 100                               | %          | China                                                             |       |
| Opta Systems, LLC                                                |       | 100                               | %          | Delaware                                                          |       |

 

----

(1)   Subsequent to June 30, 2005, CorrelantCommunications, Inc was dissolved.

(2)   Opta is in the process of dissolving LotusPacific Communications Technology, Co. Ltd. But the dissolution has not yetbeen completed.

 

52

----
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned officer of Moldflow Corporation (the "Company") hereby
certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended December 27, 2003 to which this certification is being furnished
as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item
601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item
601(b) (32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that
the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

Date: February 10, 2004

                                       /s/ SUZANNE E. MACCORMACK
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Name:    Suzanne E. MacCormack
                                       Title:   Executive Vice President of
                                                Finance and Administration and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
September 10, 2015

Mr. John E. Tremba

Straight Up Photography

404 Stadium Road

Connellsville, PA 15425

Dear Mr. Tremba:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

§§ 45.23(b), 61.113(a) and (b), 61.133(a), 91.7(a), 91.9(b)(2) and (c), 91.103, 91.109(a), 

91.119, 91.151(a), 91.203(a) and (b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) of 

and part 21 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We received your June 3, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Straight Up Photography filed 

in Docket No. FAA−2015−2640, but we are unable to process your request any further. Your 

petition does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider 

the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
### Part B—Implementation of NAFTA Supplemental Agreements
### [§5041. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §214(b), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2014]

Section, added Pub. L. 93–415, title V, §511, Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1138; amended Pub. L. 94–233, §11, Mar. 15, 1976, 90 Stat. 233, related to parole for juvenile delinquents.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Nov. 1, 1987, and applicable only to offenses committed after the taking effect of such repeal, with section to remain in effect for five years as to an individual who committed an offense or an act of juvenile delinquency before Nov. 1, 1987, and as to a term of imprisonment during the period described in section 235(a)(1)(B) of Pub. L. 98–473, see section 235(a)(1), (b)(1)(D) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3551 of this title.
Fourth Department,

May, 1913.

#### In the Matter of the Application of the Niagara, Lockport and Ontario Power Company, Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Title to Real Estate, etc., of Hubert Snyder and Others, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred.
434 P.2d 65

#### Charles D. EPLING, Petitioner-Appellee, v. STATE BOARD OF EMBALMERS AND FUNERAL DIRECTORS of the State of New Mexico, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 8269.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Nov. 20, 1967.

Boston E. Witt, Atty. Gen., Bigbee & Byrd, Richard N. Carpenter, Special Asst. Attys. Gen., Santa Fe, for appellant.

Zinn & Donnell, Santa Fe, for appellee.

OPINION

CHAVEZ, Chief Justice.

The facts in this case are substantially identical with those in the opinion filed this day in No. 8155, Roberts v. State Board of Embalmers and Funeral Directors of the State of New Mexico, 78 N.M. 536, 434 P.2d 61. Upon the authority of Roberts v. State Board, supra, the judgment' *541of the district court of Curry County in this case is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

COMPTON, J., and OMAN, J. Ct. App., concur.
Exhibit 10.102



 





*** Text Omitted and Filed Separately

Confidential Treatment Requested

Under 17 C.F.R. §§ 200.80(b)(4)

And 240.24b-2




Exhibit 10.102




    
    
           R. William Bowen, Jr.



July 17, 2007




Mr. Marcus Wolfinger

Member, Board of Management, Chief Financial Officer

Stratec Biomedical Systems AG

Gewerbestrasse 37

D-75217 Birkenfeld-Graefenhausen

Germany




Dear Marcus:



Subject to the terms of this letter, Gen-Probe hereby accepts Stratec’s performance of Phase 1
design and development activities under the Development Agreement for the Panther Instrument
System, as described in Stratec’s Phase 1 Summary Report dated June 12, 2007. Subject to the terms
of this letter, Gen-Probe hereby authorizes Stratec to immediately commence Phase 2 activities
pursuant to and in accordance with the Development Agreement, as modified by the Phase 1 Summary
Report.



Gen-Probe’s authorization to commence Phase 2 activities is subject to the following conditions:





1. Stratec will assume primary responsibility for software development for the Panther
instrument, at a fixed cost of [***]. Gen-Probe’s financial obligation under the
Development Agreement will increase by this amount, to be paid according to the payment
schedule set forth at page 11 of the Phase 1 Summary Report.




2. Section 3.2 of the Development Agreement will be amended to provide that Gen-Probe shall
be entitled to purchase and Stratec shall be



*** Confidential Treatment Requested




 









 





Mr. Marcus Wolfinger

July 17, 2007

Page 2





required to sell up to [***] Panther Prototypes at a transfer price of [***] per unit, plus
the cost of [***]. This number of Panther Prototypes is an increase of [***] over the
number originally set by the Development Agreement.




3. Section 3.2 of the Development Agreement will be amended to provide that Gen-Probe shall
be entitled to purchase and Stratec shall be required to sell up to [***] Panther
Validation Instruments (validation units in Stratec’s terminology) at a transfer price of
[***] per unit, plus the cost of [***]. This number of Panther Validation Instruments is an
increase of [***] over the number originally set by the Development Agreement.


Gen-Probe acknowledges and accepts the increase in price for Pre-Production and Series Production
Instruments, as set forth in Section 3.7 of the Phase 1 Summary Report.



We ask that Stratec signify its acceptance of the foregoing conditions by signing and returning a
copy of this letter.




Sincerely,




/s/
R. William Bowen, Jr.

R. William Bowen, Jr.
Senior Vice President & General Counsel



Acknowledged and agreed:




STRATEC Biomedical Systems AG




By /s/ Hermann Leistner




*** Confidential Treatment Requested
#### § 97.403 IRB duties.

In addition to other responsibilities assigned to IRBs under this part, each IRB shall review research covered by this subpart and approve only research that satisfies the conditions of all applicable sections of this subpart.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3, 3474; and 42 U.S.C. 300v-1(b)).
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,

I, Charles A. Miracle, hereby certify that:

          To my knowledge:

         (A)      The Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
                  ended May 31, 2003 accompanying this Certification, filed with
                  the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
                  "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange
                  Act"); and

         (B)      The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the Company.

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the provisions of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of
the accompanying Report, including for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange
Act, or as a separate disclosure document.

Dated: August 21, 2003

                             /s/ Charles A. Miracle
                             ----------------------
                               Charles A. Miracle
    Vice President Finance, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

                                      108
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 10,101

 9,196

 9,145

 8,374

 7,377

 7,181

 7,075

 7,239

 7,418

 7,318

 7,553

 7,498

 7,175

 7,227

 6,935

 7,647

 7,332

 7,956

 7,600

 7,155

 6,828

 7,282

 8,237

 9,314

 9,548

 10,675

 11,356

 10,762

 10,422

 10,096

 9,834

 2,525

 1,604

 1,222

 1,659

 1,191

 784

 853

 889

 774

 758

 880

 691

 720

 830

 749

 804

 814

 1,445

 963

 1,313

 1,340

 1,290

 1,728

 2,290

 2,241

 1,678

 2,738

 1,470

 3,713

 3,330

 1,842

 5,421

 5,057

 5,036

 4,878

 4,484

 3,837

 3,725

 3,526

 3,404

 3,257

 3,831

 3,540

 3,615

 3,720

 3,831

 4,146

 4,414

 4,612

 4,727

 4,780

 4,362

 4,468

 5,111

 5,418

 5,671

 6,487

 7,064

 6,415

 6,629

 6,311

 5,750

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 55,398

 56,855

 58,120

 59,297

 60,481

 61,400

 62,223

 62,753

 63,017

 62,522

 62,010

 60,608

 58,991

 57,331

 55,741

 54,830

 54,208

 53,942

 54,185

 55,128

 55,765

 56,707

 58,414

 60,575

 62,415

 65,362

 68,811

 71,506

 74,304

 76,469

 77,805

 3,957

 4,061

 4,151

 4,236

 4,320

 4,386

 4,445

 4,482

 4,501

 4,466

 4,429

 4,329

 4,214

 4,095

 3,982

 3,916

 3,872

 3,853

 3,870

 3,938

 3,983

 4,051

 4,172

 4,327

 4,458

 4,669

 4,915

 5,108

 5,307

 5,462

 5,558

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
(No. 77-CC-0855

#### Charles Justice, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed August 15, 1977.*

Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

*212In *Bargas v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl. ,*this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
FILED: June 5, 2023

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-4164

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

TAHJI ANTONIO ELEY

 Defendant – Appellant.

O R D E R

The court amends its opinion filed June 2, 2023, as follows:

On page 7, in the final sentence, the word “according” is corrected to “accordingly.”

For the Court – By Direction

/s/ Patricia S. Connor, Clerk

USCA4 Appeal: 21-4164 Doc: 40 Filed: 06/05/2023 Pg: 1 of 1
§ 82.300 Professional and technical services. ( a ) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in § 82.100(a), does not apply in the case of any reasonable payment to a person, other than an officer or employee of a person requesting or receiving a covered Federal action, if the payment is for professional or technical services rendered directly in the preparation, submission, or negotiation of any bid, proposal, or application for that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement or for meeting requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
( b ) The reporting requirements in § 82.110(a) and (b) regarding filing a disclosure form by each person, if required, shall not apply with respect to professional or technical services rendered directly in the preparation, submission, or negotiation of any commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan.
( c ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, “professional and technical services” shall be limited to advice and analysis directly applying any professional or technical discipline. For example, drafting or a legal document accompanying a bid or proposal by a lawyer is allowable. Similarly, technical advice provided by an engineer on the performance or operational capability of a piece of equipment rendered directly in the negotiation of a contract is allowable. However, communications with the intent to influence made by a professional (such as a licensed lawyer) or a technical person (such as a licensed accountant) are not allowable under this section unless they provide advice and analysis directly applying their professional or technical expertise and unless the advice or analysis is rendered directly and solely in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action. Thus, for example, communications with the intent to influence made by a lawyer that do not provide legal advice or analysis directly and solely related to the legal aspects of his or her client's proposal, but generally advocate one proposal over another are not allowable under this section because the lawyer is not providing professional legal services. Similarly, communications with the intent to influence made by an engineer providing an engineering analysis prior to the preparation or submission of a bid or proposal are not allowable under this section since the engineer is providing technical services but not directly in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action.
( d ) Requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving a covered Federal award include those required by law or regulation, or reasonably expected to be required by law or regulation, and any other requirements in the actual award documents.
( e ) Persons other than officers or employees of a person requesting or receiving a covered Federal action include consultants and trade associations.
( f ) Only those services expressly authorized by this section are allowable under this section.
### Part A—Interagency Environment Committee for Monitoring and Enforcement
#### § 75.227 xxx

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70327, Aug. 29, 2024.