alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 19-32214-KRH Doc 36 Filed 09/20/19 Entered 09/20/19 12:23:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 24
Case 19-32214-KRH Doc 36 Filed 09/20/19 Entered 09/20/19 12:23:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 24
Case 19-32214-KRH Doc 36 Filed 09/20/19 Entered 09/20/19 12:23:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 24
Case 19-32214-KRH Doc 36 Filed 09/20/19 Entered 09/20/19 12:23:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 24
Case 19-32214-KRH Doc 36 Filed 09/20/19 Entered 09/20/19 12:23:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 24
Case 19-32214-KRH Doc 36 Filed 09/20/19 Entered 09/20/19 12:23:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 24
Case 19-32214-KRH Doc 36 Filed 09/20/19 Entered 09/20/19 12:23:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 24
Case 19-32214-KRH Doc 36 Filed 09/20/19 Entered 09/20/19 12:23:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 24
Case 19-32214-KRH Doc 36 Filed 09/20/19 Entered 09/20/19 12:23:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 24
Case 19-32214-KRH Doc 36 Filed 09/20/19 Entered 09/20/19 12:23:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 24
Case 19-32214-KRH Doc 36 Filed 09/20/19 Entered 09/20/19 12:23:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 11 of 24
Case 19-32214-KRH Doc 36 Filed 09/20/19 Entered 09/20/19 12:23:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 12 of 24
Case 19-32214-KRH Doc 36 Filed 09/20/19 Entered 09/20/19 12:23:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 13 of 24
Case 19-32214-KRH Doc 36 Filed 09/20/19 Entered 09/20/19 12:23:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 14 of 24
Case 19-32214-KRH Doc 36 Filed 09/20/19 Entered 09/20/19 12:23:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 15 of 24
Case 19-32214-KRH Doc 36 Filed 09/20/19 Entered 09/20/19 12:23:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 16 of 24
Case 19-32214-KRH Doc 36 Filed 09/20/19 Entered 09/20/19 12:23:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 17 of 24
Case 19-32214-KRH Doc 36 Filed 09/20/19 Entered 09/20/19 12:23:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 18 of 24
Case 19-32214-KRH Doc 36 Filed 09/20/19 Entered 09/20/19 12:23:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 19 of 24
Case 19-32214-KRH Doc 36 Filed 09/20/19 Entered 09/20/19 12:23:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 20 of 24
Case 19-32214-KRH Doc 36 Filed 09/20/19 Entered 09/20/19 12:23:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 21 of 24
Case 19-32214-KRH Doc 36 Filed 09/20/19 Entered 09/20/19 12:23:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 22 of 24
Case 19-32214-KRH Doc 36 Filed 09/20/19 Entered 09/20/19 12:23:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 23 of 24
Case 19-32214-KRH Doc 36 Filed 09/20/19 Entered 09/20/19 12:23:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 24 of 24
EXHIBIT 31.2



Certification of Michael J. Ruane

Required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) and

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Michael J. Ruane, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of SunGard Data Systems Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 12, 2004



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael J. Ruane                                     
|Michael J. Ruane                                         
|Senior Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer
§ 300.190 By-pass—general. ( a ) If, on December 2, 1983, the date of enactment of the Education of the Handicapped Act Amendments of 1983, an SEA was prohibited by law from providing for the equitable participation in special programs of children with disabilities enrolled in private elementary schools and secondary schools as required by section 612(a)(10)(A) of the Act, or if the Secretary determines that an SEA, LEA, or other public agency has substantially failed or is unwilling to provide for such equitable participation then the Secretary shall, notwithstanding such provision of law, arrange for the provision of services to these children through arrangements which shall be subject to the requirements of section 612(a)(10)(A) of the Act.
( b ) The Secretary waives the requirement of section 612(a)(10)(A) of the Act and of §§ 300.131 through 300.144 if the Secretary implements a by-pass.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(f)(1))
**Exhibit 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-121539, Form S-8 No. 333-112365, Form S-8No. 333-72444 and Form S-8 No. 333-42904) pertaining to the California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, the California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1998 Stock-Based Incentive CompensationPlan and 1990 Employee Stock Option Plan of our reports dated March 15, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of California Pizza Kitchen, Inc.; California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting; and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 1, 2006.

 

Los Angeles, California 

March 15, 2006
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY

 5,706

 5,708

 5,717

 5,733

 5,719

 5,736

 5,751

 7,211

 8,196

 8,014

 7,876

 8,019

 8,214

 7,026

 6,473

 6,474

 6,474

 6,475

 6,490

 6,505

 6,483

 6,504

 7,850

 8,238

 8,166

 8,315

 8,127

 8,266

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 9,994

 10,083

 9,855

 10,055

 10,118

 10,783

 10,065

 9,593

 8,850

 10,045

 5,984

 8,299

 9,479

 8,112

 10,802

 8,850

 7,114

 7,307

 7,537

 7,368

 7,134

 7,155

 7,152

 14,267

 13,902

 14,293

 8,247

 8,410

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2001 FEDERAL-STATE OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 28, 2001

TOTAL

TOTALS 195,466 0 0

STATE

 5,706

 5,708

 5,717

 5,733

 5,719

 5,736

 5,751

 7,211

 8,196

 8,014

 7,876

 8,019

 8,214

 7,026

 6,473

 6,474

 6,474

 6,475

 6,490

 6,505

 6,483

 6,504

 7,850

 8,238

 8,166

 8,315

 8,127

 8,266

 9,994

 10,083

 9,855

 10,055

 10,118

 10,783

 10,065

 9,593

 8,850

 10,045

 5,984

 8,299

 9,479

 8,112

 10,802

 8,850

 7,114

 7,307

 7,537

 7,368

 7,134

 7,155

 7,152

 14,267

 13,902

 14,293

 8,247

 8,410

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 278

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 4,235

 4,201

 4,052

 5,710

 3,111

 2,184

 1,775

 2,356

 2,246

 1,606

 3,867

 1,786

 1,948

 2,062

 1,278

 1,361

 1,840

 3,091

 2,147

 2,238

 2,660

 2,865

 1,798

 994

 2,070

 1,391

 1,565

 1,170

 260,853

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 4,235

 4,201

 4,052

 5,710

 3,111

 2,184

 1,775

 2,356

 2,246

 1,606

 3,867

 1,786

 1,948

 2,062

 1,278

 1,361

 1,840

 3,091

 2,147

 2,238

 2,660

 2,865

 1,798

 994

 2,070

 1,391

 1,565

 1,170

FED STATE

TRACY PUMPING

FED TOTAL

DELTA 

PUMPING PLANT

CLIFT

COURT

TOTAL

 9,908

 9,911

 9,898

 9,905

 9,903

 10,761

 9,915

 9,915

 8,915

 9,916

 5,941

 7,934

 9,307

 8,907

 10,888

 7,303

 7,329

 7,328

 7,322

 7,325

 7,328

 7,327

 7,323

 15,664

 15,667

 15,371

 7,924

 7,806

 195,466 262,941 260,853

FED

BANKS

XVC

 0

STATE

DOS

AMIGOS

XVC

 0

BYRON

BETHANY

TOTAL

 278

AQEDUCT CHECK 21

STATE FED TOTAL

DMC-POOL

DEMANDS

 2,159

 2,153

 2,119

 2,111

 2,277

 2,675

 2,955

 3,915

 3,527

 3,030

 2,960

 3,277

 3,330

 3,034

 3,269

 3,475

 3,544

 3,567

 3,257

 3,191

 3,471

 3,965

 4,271

 3,339

 3,086

 3,262

 3,119

 3,545

 67,607 0 67,607 87,883

COMMENTS: ALL VALUES IN ACRE-FEET
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7625]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Human Genome Research Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; Genetic Susceptibility to Lung Cancer in 
Families from Southern Louisiana.
    Date: April 4, 2011.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 1:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: NHGRI Office, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, Rockville, 
MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Rudy O. Pozzatti, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Human Genome Research 
Institute, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, MSC 9306, Rockville, MD 
20852, (301) 402-0838, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3f4f5045455e4b4b4d7f525e56531151565711585049"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3a4a5540405b4e4e487a575b535614545352145d554c">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 25, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-7625 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Robert DUDLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. MUNLEY; G.L. Jannings, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-6184.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 2, 2002.

Decided May 20, 2002.

Robert Dudley, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Robert Dudley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm *930on the reasoning of the district court. *Dudley v. Munley,*No. CA-00-601 (E.D.Va. Jan. 2, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### § 110.14 Burden of proof.

The burden of proving that an age distinction or other action falls within the exceptions outlined in §§ 110.12 and 110.13 is on the recipient of Federal financial assistance.

(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6104)
#### Richard E. Burger, Suing on Behalf of Himself and All Other Stockholders Similarly Situated of the Griffon Shirt Company, Appellant, v. The Griffon Shirt Company and Others, Respondents.

As this action is to be tried on the merits within a few days the discretion of the Special Term will not be interfered with. Order affirmed, without costs. All concurred.
Exhibit 21



               SUBSIDIARIES OF FIRST INDIANA CORPORATION
                                 AND

                          FIRST INDIANA BANK

     First Indiana Corporation's wholly owned subsidiary is
First Indiana Bank, which is organized under the laws of the United
States.

     First Indiana Bank  has the following direct and indirect
subsidiaries:


Name                                    State of Incorporation

One Mortgage Corporation                     Indiana

One Investment Corporation                   Indiana

One Property Corporation                     Indiana

One Insurance Agency, Inc. *                 Indiana

Pioneer Service Corporation                  Indiana


* One Insurance Agency, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of One
Investment Corporation.
<PAGE> (10-K page 90)
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Beacon Power Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, F. William Capp, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ F. William Capp

F. William Capp

Chief Executive Officer

 

May 8, 2006

 

 

- 1 -
§ 463.215 Under what circumstances are local areas eligible for State Incentive Grants? ( a ) The Governor is not required to award local incentive funds, but is authorized to provide incentive grants to local areas for performance on the primary indicators of performance consistent with WIOA sec. 134(a)(3)(A)(xi).
( b ) The Governor may use non-Federal funds to create incentives for the Local WDBs to implement pay-for-performance contract strategies for the delivery of training services described in WIOA sec. 134(c)(3) or activities described in WIOA sec. 129(c)(2) in the local areas served by the Local WDBs. Pay-for-performance contract strategies must be implemented in accordance with 20 CFR part 683, subpart E and § 463.160.
§ 33.9 Answer. ( a ) The defendant may request a hearing by filing an answer with the reviewing official within 30 days of service of the complaint. An answer is deemed to be a request for hearing.
( b ) In the answer, the defendant: ( 1 ) Shall admit or deny each of the allegations of liability made in the complaint;
( 2 ) Shall state any defense on which the defendant intends to rely;
( 3 ) May state any reasons why the defendant contends that the penalties and assessments should be less than the statutory maximum; and
( 4 ) Shall state the name, address, and telephone number of the person authorized by the defendant to act as defendant's representative, if any.
( c ) If the defendant is unable to file an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section within the time provided, the defendant may, before the expiration of 30 days from service of the complaint, file with the reviewing official a general answer denying liability and requesting a hearing, and a request for an extension of time within which to file an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section. The reviewing official shall file promptly with the ALJ the complaint, the general answer denying liability, and the request for an extension of time as provided in § 33.11 for good cause shown, the ALJ may grant the defendant up to 30 additional days within which to file an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3803(d)(2), 3809)
#### Curry v. Commonwealth.

May 23, 1941.

Harvey H. Smith for appellant.

Hubert Meredith, Attorney General, and Harry D. France, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Thomas

— Dismissing appeal.

Appellant was convicted in the Jefferson circuit court on appeal from a like conviction in the Jefferson Quarterly Court on an accusation wherein he was charged with violating some provision of our Alcoholic Control Act, Ky. St. sec. 2554b-l et seq. In the Quarterly Court he was fined $200 with forfeiting orders provided by the statute, but on his trial in the Circuit Court on appeal from the Quarterly Court his fine was reduced to $100. Clearly the offense, charged was and is a misdemeanor. On motion made in the Circuit Court appellant was granted an appeal to this one, but no motion has been made in this Court for the granting of the appeal, as is prescribed by section 348 of our Criminal Code of Practice. In the cases of Gilbert v. Commonwealth, 265 Ky. 154, 95 S. W. (2d) 1118; Adams v. Commonwealth, 285 Ky. 803, 149 S. W. (2d) 727, and Elkin v. Commonwealth, 269 Ky. 6, 106 S. W. (2d) 83, and others of like tenor, we held that the circuit court had no right to grant an appeal in convictions for misdemeanor, but that a review of the trial resulting in the conviction might be had in this court through an appeal granted by it pursuant to the section of the Code supra. Under those opinions this appeal has not *743been properly prosecuted, and the motion of the commonwealth to dismiss it should be and it is sustained.

An additional reason for sustaining the motion to dismiss is that the record as filed in this court is not certified by the clerk of the Jefferson Circuit Court, and because of which appellant has entered motion for a rule requiring the clerk of the Jefferson circuit court to certify to the typewritten material filed by him in this court, and which he claims to be the entire record of the trial court’s proceedings. However, the record as so filed was not made out by the clerk of the Jefferson circuit court but appears to be copies of the record as made by appellant, or someone whom he procured to do the mechanical work. In the circumstances the clerk should not be required to certify to the correctness of the copies of what purportedly transpired in the circuit court as made or caused to be made by the appellant himself. Hence, the motion for the rule is denied. If, however, the record had been made by the clerk of the trial court and he had omitted to certify to it — thereby presenting a clear case for the issuance of the rule to require him to certify to it — then the appeal would nevertheless have to be dismissed because not perfected according to the provisions of the Criminal Code to which we have referred.

Wherefore, appellant’s motion for the rule against the clerk of the Jefferson Circuit Court to certify the bundle of papers that have been filed in this Court which appellant and his attorney claim to be the record is overruled; but the motion of the commonwealth to dismiss the appeal (or what counsel for appellant claims to be an appeal) is sustained and the appeal is dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>


       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>          DEC-31-1998

<CASH>                       20,879,387 
<SECURITIES>                       0    
<RECEIVABLES>                      0    
<ALLOWANCES>                       0    
<INVENTORY>                        0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             20,879,387 
<PP&E>                             0    
<DEPRECIATION>                     0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               20,879,387 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              0    
<BONDS>                            0    
<COMMON>                           0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0    
<PREFERRED>                        0    
<OTHER-SE>                   20,879,387 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 20,879,387 
<SALES>                      10,576,925 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             12,354,088 
<CGS>                              0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 4,522,544 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              1,501,707 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            4,900,388 
<INCOME-PRETAX>               1,429,449 
<INCOME-TAX>                       0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           1,553,514 
<DISCONTINUED>               13,039,381 
<EXTRAORDINARY>               5,235,540 
<CHANGES>                          0    
<NET-INCOME>                 19,828,435 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    104.45 
<EPS-DILUTED>                    104.45 


        


</TABLE>
### §3001. Procedure governed by rules; scope, purpose and effect; definition of terms; local rules; forms—(Rule)

#### See Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

Scope, rule 1.

Purpose and construction, rule 2.

Proceedings to which rules apply, rules 54 and 59.

Definition, rule 54(c).

Rules of District Courts and Circuit Courts of Appeal, rule 57.

Forms, rule 58.

Effective date, rule 59.

Citation of rule, rule 60.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 814.)