alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Harrison Spiak et al., Respondents, v. Mutual Coal Co., Inc., Appellant.

All concur.
### §460m–13. Suitability for preservation as a wilderness; area review and report to President

Within three years from March 1, 1972, the Secretary shall review the area within the boundaries of the national river and shall report to the President, in accordance with section 1132(c) and (d) of this title, his recommendation as to the suitability or nonsuitability of any area within the national river for preservation as a wilderness, and any designation of any such area as a wilderness, shall be accomplished in accordance with said section 1132(c) and (d) of this title.

(Pub. L. 92–237, §6, Mar. 1, 1972, 86 Stat. 46.)
§ 637.31 How does the Secretary evaluate an application? ( a ) The Secretary evaluates an application on the basis of the criteria in § 637.32.
( b ) The Secretary informs applicants of the maximum possible score for each criterion in the application package or in a notice published in the Federal Register.
( c ) The Secretary gives priority to applicants which have not previously received funding from the program and to previous grantees with a proven record of success, as well as to applications that contribute to achieving balance among funded projects with respect to: ( 1 ) Geographic region;
( 2 ) Academic discipline; and
( 3 ) Project type.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1067-1067c, 1067g-1067k, 1068, and 1068b)
[46 FR 51204, Oct. 16, 1981, as amended at 52 FR 43545, Nov. 12, 1987; 70 FR 13374, Mar. 21, 2005]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 703

 648

 528

 445

 452

 521

 458

 515

 546

 590

 535

 564

 525

 549

 520

 542

 431

 318

 359

 363

 324

 406

 425

 513

 477

 434

 471

 483

 440

 526

 446

 538

 430

 322

 287

 284

 291

 288

 292

 288

 282

 279

 277

 273

 271

 267

 264

 250

 263

 259

 255

 249

 245

 253

 265

 279

 292

 322

 330

 357

 339

 348

 607

 561

 407

 347

 324

 348

 336

 342

 353

 353

 339

 346

 340

 345

 338

 340

 304

 277

 281

 280

 275

 295

 315

 339

 333

 340

 365

 380

 383

 398

 400

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 4, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 391

 363

 268

 230

 216

 231

 224

 227

 234

 234

 226

 230

 226

 229

 225

 226

 204

 187

 190

 189

 186

 198

 211

 226

 222

 226

 242

 251

 253

 262

 263

TOTAL 10,991

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-20708 Summary Calendar

__________________

KENNETH W. MAGGARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus WAYNE SCOTT, Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

(CA-H-96-757)

______________________________________________

December 20, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Texas state prisoner Kenneth W. Maggard, #536922, appeals the dismissal of his suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) for lack of

venue. Having reviewed the record and Maggard’s brief, we hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing1 Maggard’s motion for stay pending appeal is also dismissed.
2 Maggard’s ac tion without prejudice. See Lowery v. Estelle , 533 F.2d 265, 267 (5th Cir. 1976).

Because the appeal is frivolous it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R.
42.2. 1 We warn Maggard that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions.
To avoid sanctions, Maggard is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2010 (the Report), which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such quarter and the results
of operations of the Registrant for such quarter.
  /s/ Barry D. QuartBarry D. Quart, Pharm.D.President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ John W. BeckJohn W. BeckSenior Vice President, Finance and
Operations and Chief Financial Officer (As
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  Note:
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Ardea Biosciences, Inc. and will be retained by Ardea Biosciences, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                            AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO (2)

                                       TO

                     Employment Contract Dated May 25, 1995
                                     Between
                      Global TeleMedia International, Inc.
                                       and
                                 Melissa D. Hart


This Amendment Number Three (3) dated February 1, 1997 to that certain
Employment Agreement dated May 25, 1995 by and between Global TeleMedia
International, Inc. and Melissa Hart shall be amended as follows

     Article 2. shall be amended to revise Article 2.1 as follows:

     2.   COMPENSATION.

               2.1  For all services rendered hereunder, Employer agrees to pay
          Employee and Employee agrees to accept from Employer, annual base
          compensation computed at the rate of Fifty Two Thousand Dollars and No
          Cents ($52,000.00) per annum during the term of Employee's employment,
          prorated base don the period of actual service and payable in
          accordance with Employer's standard payroll policies.  The Board of
          Directors of Employer may increase Employee's compensation from time
          to time and will review Employee's performance hereunder and his
          compensation therefor in accordance with principles and practices
          generally acceptable to Employer's employees.

All other terms and conditions of the original agreement dated May 25, 1995
shall remain in full force and effect.


GLOBAL TELEMEDIA INTERNATIONAL,              MELISSA HART
INC.



By:  /s/ Roderick A. McClain                 By:   /s/ Melissa Hart
    --------------------------------------        -----------------------------
Its: President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit  1


                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


THIS  AMENDED  AGREEMENT  (the "Amendment") is made and effective as of November
30,  2000,  by  and  between  Meridian  Holdings,  Inc. ("Meridian"), a Colorado
corporation,  Intercare.com-Dx, Inc. ("Intercare"), a California corporation and
a subsidiary of Meridian, and Russell A. Lyon ("Executive"), an individual, with
respect  to  the  following  facts  and  understandings:

                                    RECITALS

     WHEREAS,  there  was  an employment agreement ("Agreement") entered into on
October  31,  1999  by  and  between  Meridian, Intercare Diagnostics, Inc., the
predecessor of Intercare, and Executive in which the latter is retained to serve
in  the  capacity  of  President  and Chief Technology Officer of Intercare from
November  1,  1999  and  up  to  and  including  November  1,  2001.

WHEREAS,  Article  3.3  of the Agreement granted Executive an option to purchase
cumulatively up to 500,000 restricted shares of Meridian's common stock pursuant
to  the  then  existing  Stock  Option Agreement between Meridian and Executive.

                                    AMENDMENT

     Sufficient  consideration haven been given and received, it is now mutually
agreed  between all concerned that that paragraph of the Agreement be amended to
read  as  follows:

"3.3.  Stock Option.   As an additional element of compensation to Executive, in
       ------------
consideration of the services to be rendered, Intercare shall grant to Executive
200,000  restricted  shares  of  Intercare's  common stock having a par value of
$0.000.   Executive shall have the opportunity to exercise the option during the
term  of  his  employment.   The  terms  and  condition  of such option shall be
governed  by  the  Stock  Option  Agreement  between  Intercare  and Executive."

Agreed  To:         BY:  INTERCARE     BY:  MERIDIAN      BY:  EXECUTIVE
                    --------------     -------------      --------------

             /s/  Anthony  C.  Dike  /s/  Anthony  C. Dike  /s/ Russel A.Lyon
Signatures:      ______________       ___________              ____________
                  Anthony  Dike        Anthony  Dike           Russel  A Lyon


Witness:          /s/  Philip  Falese
                   ______________
                   Philip  Falese
§ 686.25 Correspondence study. ( a ) An institution calculates a TEACH Grant for a payment period for a student in a program of study offered by correspondence courses without terms, but not including any residential component, by— ( 1 ) Using the half-time annual award; and
( 2 ) Multiplying the half-time annual award by the lesser of— ( i ) ; or
( ii )
( b ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section— ( 1 ) The institution must make the first payment to a student for an academic year, as calculated under paragraph (a) of this section, after the student submits 25 percent of the lessons or otherwise completes 25 percent of the work scheduled for the program or the academic year, whichever occurs last; and
( 2 ) The institution must make the second payment to a student for an academic year, as calculated under paragraph (a) of this section, after the student submits 75 percent of the lessons or otherwise completes 75 percent of the work scheduled for the program or the academic year, whichever occurs last.
( c ) In a program of correspondence study offered by correspondence courses using terms but not including any residential component— ( 1 ) The institution must prepare a written schedule for submission of lessons that reflects a workload of at least 30 hours of preparation per semester hour or 20 hours of preparation per quarter hour during the term;
( 2 ) ( i ) If the student is enrolled in at least six credit hours that commence and are completed in that term, the half-time annual award is used to calculate the payment for the payment period; or
( ii ) If the student is enrolled in less than six credit hours that commence and are completed in that term the less-than-half-time annual award is used to calculate the payment for the payment period;
( 3 ) A payment for a payment period is calculated using the formula in § 686.22(d) except that paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this section are used in lieu of § 686.22(d)(1) and (2), respectively; and
( 4 ) The institution must make the payment to a student for a payment period after that student completes 50 percent of the lessons or otherwise completes 50 percent of the work scheduled for the term, whichever occurs last.
( d ) Payments for periods of residential training must be calculated under § 686.22(d) if the residential training is offered using terms and credit hours or under § 686.22(e) if the residential training is offered using credit hours without terms or clock hours.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070g, *et seq.*)
[73 35495, June 23, 2008, as amended at 74 FR 20221, May 1, 2009]
Myriad Genetics, Inc. Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy



 Exhibit 10.6 
 Myriad Genetics, Inc. 
 Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy 
 (effective October 1, 2007) 
 The
following is a description of the standard compensation arrangements under which our non-employee directors are compensated for their service as directors, including as members of the various committees of our Board. 
  

			
	Annual Retainer	 	$50,000
		
	Chairman of the Board	 	$35,000 additional retainer
		
	Committee Chair Compensation	 	
	 Audit Committee
	 	$25,000 additional retainer
	 Compensation Committee
	 	$15,000 additional retainer
	 Nominating and Governance Committee
	 	$15,000 additional retainer
		
	Committee Member Compensation	 	
	(other than each Committee Chair)	 	
	Audit Committee	 	$12,000 additional retainer
	Compensation Committee	 	$7,500 additional retainer
	Nominating and Governance Committee	 	$7,500 additional retainer
		
	Per Meeting Fees	 	We plan to pay each non-employee director a per meeting cash fee, in an amount which has not yet been established by the Board, if they are required to attend more than five in-person meetings
and four telephonic meetings each fiscal year.
		
	Stock Option Awards	 	
	Upon initial election	 	15,000 options
	Annually	 	15,000 options

 All cash fees are paid in four quarterly installments following each quarter of service.
Non-employee directors are also reimbursed for their out-of pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings. 
 All options are granted under
our 2003 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Option Plan, as amended (the “2003 Plan”), and vest in full on the first anniversary of the date of grant, assuming continued membership on the Board. Annual option grants are made
automatically under the terms of the 2003 Plan on the date of our annual meeting of stockholders, provided that a director who was initially elected to the Board within six months of the annual meeting shall not receive an annual grant. Options are
exercisable after the termination of the director’s service on the Board to the extent exercisable on the date of such termination for the remainder of the life of the option. All options will become fully exercisable upon a change of control
of Myriad or upon the director’s death, as provided for under the 2003 Plan.
(No. 74-CC-385

#### Emulsified Asphalts, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 18, 1974.*

Emulsified Asphalts, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

*197William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW data

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre Feet

Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval 

Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 2 0 0 6,894 4,228 11,122 13,674 8,387 22,061 0.0 0.0

2-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 2 0 0 6,453 4,244 10,697 12,800 8,418 21,218 0.0 0.0

3-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 6,407 4,224 10,631 12,708 8,379 21,087 0.0 0.0

4-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 12 0 12 3 0 0 6,366 4,241 10,607 12,626 8,413 21,039 0.0 0.0

5-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 6,070 4,233 10,304 12,040 8,397 20,437 0.0 0.0

6-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 3 0 0 6,388 4,229 10,617 12,670 8,389 21,059 0.0 0.0

7-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 6,804 4,268 11,072 13,496 8,466 21,962 0.0 0.0

8-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 3 0 0 5,411 4,325 9,736 10,733 8,579 19,312 0.0 0.0

9-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 3 0 0 5,493 4,324 9,816 10,895 8,576 19,471 0.0 0.0

10-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 4 0 0 5,448 4,325 9,774 10,807 8,579 19,386 0.0 0.0

11-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 5,266 4,238 9,505 10,446 8,407 18,853 0.0 0.0

12-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4,746 4,218 8,964 9,414 8,366 17,780 0.0 0.0

13-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 3,247 4,234 7,482 6,441 8,399 14,840 0.0 0.0

14-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3,918 4,231 8,149 7,772 8,392 16,164 0.0 0.0

15-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 3 0 0 3,926 4,229 8,155 7,787 8,388 16,175 0.0 0.0

16-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2,825 4,255 7,080 5,604 8,439 14,043 0.0 0.0

17-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2,993 4,236 7,229 5,936 8,403 14,339 0.0 0.0

18-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2,987 4,225 7,212 5,925 8,380 14,305 0.0 0.0

19-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3,184 4,230 7,414 6,316 8,390 14,706 0.0 0.0

20-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 2,932 4,239 7,171 5,815 8,409 14,224 0.0 0.0

21-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,758 4,228 6,986 5,471 8,386 13,857 0.0 0.0

22-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,613 4,215 6,827 5,182 8,360 13,542 0.0 0.0

23-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,449 4,211 6,660 4,858 8,353 13,211 0.0 0.0

24-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 1 0 0 2,500 3,518 6,018 4,959 6,977 11,936 0.0 0.0

25-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,422 3,509 5,931 4,805 6,960 11,765 0.0 0.0

26-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 1 0 0 2,447 3,505 5,953 4,854 6,953 11,807 0.0 0.0

27-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,828 3,512 6,340 5,609 6,967 12,576 0.0 0.0

28-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,474 3,516 5,990 4,908 6,973 11,881 0.0 0.0

29-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3,791 3,519 7,309 7,519 6,979 14,498 0.0 0.0

30-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4,019 3,532 7,551 7,971 7,006 14,977 0.0 0.0

31-Dec-17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4,111 3,545 7,656 8,154 7,032 15,186 0.0 0.0

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 56 8 64 XXXX 0 0 130,171 125,789 255,960 258,195 249,502 507,697 XXXX XXXX

Official data is posted on CDFW's webpage.

Banks Tracy Combined Banks SWP CVP

CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT, SPLITTAIL and LONGFIN REPORT

DECEMBER 2017

DATE

Delta Smelt Daily 

Density

Tracy Combined
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 64 (Monday, April 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18546-18547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7857]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice Announcing Filing Priority for Preliminary Permit 
Applications

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Project
                                                                  No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XLVII..............................   13743-000
FFP Missouri 16, LLC........................................   13753-000
Solia 7 Hydroelectric, LLC..................................   13769-000
Three Rivers Hydro LLC......................................   13785-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 18547]]

    On March 24, 2011, the Commission held a drawing to determine 
priority among competing preliminary permit applications with identical 
filing times. In the event that the Commission concludes that none of 
the applicants' plans are better adapted than the others to develop, 
conserve, and utilize in the public interest the water resources of the 
region at issue, the priority established by this drawing will serve as 
the tiebreaker. Based on the drawing, the order of priority is as 
follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Project
                                                                  No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. FFP Missouri 16, LLC.....................................   13753-000
2. Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XLVII...........................   13743-000
3. Solia 7 Hydroelectric, LLC...............................   13769-000
4. Three Rivers Hydro LLC...................................   13785-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Dated: March 25, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-7857 Filed 4-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1783 

NADINE YVETTE LAFELL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court.

(05-20562)

Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 2, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nadine Yvette Lafell, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth L. Greene,

Michael J. Haungs, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Tax

Division, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Nadine Yvette Lafell appeals the tax court’s order

dismissing her petition for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the tax court. Lafell v. Comm’r, IRS,

Tax Ct. No. 05-20562 (U.S. Tax Ct. May 2, 2006). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 454

 455

 440

 452

 468

 474

 466

 465

 500

 533

 533

 462

 495

 519

 528

 566

 363

 326

 304

 295

 302

 309

 314

 312

 299

 296

 318

 331

 0

 0

 0

 431

 416

 409

 394

 396

 386

 390

 370

 390

 399

 420

 404

 383

 385

 388

 327

 286

 271

 267

 285

 294

 302

 309

 294

 294

 290

 292

 304

 0

 0

 0

 444

 435

 421

 417

 426

 427

 428

 417

 431

 447

 469

 436

 426

 428

 437

 394

 313

 290

 278

 290

 297

 304

 312

 305

 297

 292

 299

 310

 0

 0

 0

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 290

 285

 276

 274

 279

 280

 281

 274

 282

 292

 306

 285

 279

 281

 286

 259

 209

 195

 188

 195

 200

 204

 209

 204

 200

 196

 201

 208

 0

 0

 0

TOTAL 10,470

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Annual Report
      on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) by
      China Shen Zhou Mining & Resources, Inc. (the “Registrant”), I, Xiaojing Yu,
      hereby certify that:





1.
      To the
      best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      To the
      best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      the Registrant.








Dated:
      April 11, 2008





By:
      /s/
      Xiaojing Yu





Xiaojing
      Yu


Chief
      Executive Officer