alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Richardson Drug Company et al. v. Simon Oberfelder.

Filed September 21, 1899.

No. 8982.

Conditional Sale of Goods: Future Purchases: Agency. The agreement on which this action was based held one of conditional sale, and not of agency; that purchases of goods made by the vendee of the contract were not, by virtue thereof, for the benefit or in behalf of the vendors. *(Richardson Drug Co. v. Teasdall,*53 Neb. 698, 73 N. W. Rep. 1028; *Richardson Drug Co. v. Plummer,*56 Neb. 523, 76 N. W. Rep. 1086.)

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Tibbets, J.

*Reversed.*

*John P. Maulé,*for plaintiffs in error,

*George E. Etimer, contra.*

Harrison, C. J.

The defendant in error instituted this action in the district court of Lancaster county against the Richard*823son Drug Company, the Lincoln Paint & Color Company, Tilomas L. Teasdall, and Alice M. Teasdall to recover an amount alleged to be bis due on an account for goods and merchandise sold and delivered to the two last-named parties, who, it was pleaded, purchased as agents for and in behalf and for the benefit of the two stated companies. The defendants in error were giv.en a judgment against the drug company and paint and color company, grounded on the proposition that the Teasdalls were, by an agreement entered into by them and the drug company and paint and color company prior to the purchases, the charges for which were embodied in the account in suit, constituted the agents of the companies and the purchases were for them and their benefit.

The contract to which we have referred was construed by this court in an opinion in the case of the *Richardson Drug Co. v. Teasdall,*reported in 52 Neb. 698, 72 N. W. Rep. 1028; also in the decision in the case of the *Richardsow Drug Co. v. Plummer,*56 Neb. 523, 76 N. W. Rep. 1086, and in each was determined to be one of conditional sale and not one of agency, and in the latter opinion it was stated by Sullivan, J., who wrote it for the court, that the agreement “did not contemplate that the Teasdalls should possess any agency to purchase goods, and pledge the credit of the plaintiffs in error for their payment.” This is directly in point in the present case, and conform-ably to the views then expressed the judgment in the case at bar is erroneous and must be reversed.

Reversed and remanded.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7589]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Geriatrics and Gerontology Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the 
Geriatrics and Gerontology Advisory Committee will be held on April 14-
15, 2011, in Room 250, Department of Veterans Affairs, 1575 Eye Street, 
NW., Washington, DC. On April 14, the session will begin at 8:30 a.m. 
and end at 5 p.m. On April 15, the session will begin at 8 a.m. and end 
at 12 noon. This meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice to the Secretary 
of Veterans Affairs and the Under Secretary for Health on all matters 
pertaining to geriatrics and gerontology. The Committee assesses the 
capability of VA health care facilities and programs to meet the 
medical, psychological, and social needs of older Veterans and 
evaluates VA programs designated as Geriatric Research, Education, and 
Clinical Centers.
    The meeting will feature presentations and discussions on VA's 
geriatrics and extended care programs, aging research activities, 
update on VA's employee staff working in the area of geriatrics (to 
include training, recruitment and retention approaches), Veterans 
Health Administration (VHA) strategic planning activities in geriatrics 
and extended care, recent VHA efforts regarding dementia and program 
advances in palliative care, and performance and oversight of the VA 
Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Centers.
    No time will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral 
presentations from the public. Interested parties should provide 
written comments for review by the Committee to Mrs. Marcia Holt-
Delaney, Program Analyst, Office of Geriatrics and Extended Care (114), 
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20420. Individuals who wish to attend the meeting should contact Mrs. 
Holt-Delaney at (202) 461-6769 or e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b2ffd3c0d1dbd39cfadddec69ff6d7ded3dcd7cbf2c4d39cd5ddc4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="96dbf7e4f5fff7b8def9fae2bbd2f3faf7f8f3efd6e0f7b8f1f9e0">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: March 28, 2011.

    By direction of the Secretary.
William F. Russo,
Director of Regulations Management, Office of General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2011-7589 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P<?ERROR?>


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We  consent  to the use in this  10-KSB of  Cofitras  Entertainment,  Inc.,  the
financial statements of Cofitras Entertainment,  Inc., on page F-2 of our report
dated June 18,  1998  (which  includes  an  explanatory  paragraph  relating  to
substantial  doubt about the Company's  ability to continue as a going concern),
on the financial  statements of Cofitras  Entertainment,  Inc. as of and for the
year ended December 31, 1997, which is a part of this 10-KSB.

/s/ Jones, Jensen & Company 

Jones, Jensen & Company 
Salt Lake City, Utah
July 13, 1998
§ 668.61 Recovery of funds from interim disbursements. ( a ) If an institution discovers, as a result of verification, that an applicant received under § 668.58(a)(2)(i)(B) more financial aid than the applicant was eligible to receive, the institution must eliminate the Federal Pell Grant, Federal Perkins Loan, or FSEOG overpayment by— ( 1 ) Adjusting subsequent disbursements in the award year in which the overpayment occurred; or
( 2 ) Reimbursing the appropriate program account by— ( i ) Requiring the applicant to return the overpayment to the institution if the institution cannot correct the overpayment under paragraph (a)(1) of this section; or
( ii ) Making restitution from its own funds, by the earlier of the following dates, if the applicant does not return the overpayment: ( A ) Sixty days after the applicant's last day of attendance.
( B ) The last day of the award year in which the institution disbursed Federal Pell Grant, Federal Perkins Loan, or FSEOG Program funds to the applicant.
( b ) If an institution discovers, as a result of verification, that an applicant received under § 668.58(a)(2)(ii) more financial aid than the applicant was eligible to receive, the institution must eliminate the FWS overpayment by— ( 1 ) Adjusting the applicant's other financial aid; or
( 2 ) Reimbursing the FWS program account by making restitution from its own funds, if the institution cannot correct the overpayment under paragraph (b)(1) of this section. The applicant must still be paid for all work performed under the institution's own payroll account.
( c ) If an institution disbursed subsidized student financial assistance to an applicant under § 668.58(a)(3), and did not receive the valid SAR or valid ISIR reflecting corrections within the deadlines established under § 668.60, the institution must reimburse the appropriate program account by making restitution from its own funds. The applicant must still be paid for all work performed under the institution's own payroll account.
Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1845-0041) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1094)
### SUBCHAPTER D—PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN INFRINGEMENT ACTIONS, REMEDIES, AND ARBITRATION
### §2332d. Financial transactions

(a) Offense.—Except as provided in regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, whoever, being a United States person, knowing or having reasonable cause to know that a country is designated under section 6(j) 1 of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2405) as a country supporting international terrorism, engages in a financial transaction with the government of that country, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both.

(b) Definitions.—As used in this section—

(1) the term "financial transaction" has the same meaning as in section 1956(c)(4); and

(2) the term "United States person" means any—

(A) United States citizen or national;

(B) permanent resident alien;

(C) juridical person organized under the laws of the United States; or

(D) any person in the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 104–132, title III, §321(a), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1254; amended Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, §4002(a)(5), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1806.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 6(j) of the Export Administration Act of 1979, referred to in subsec. (a), was classified to section 2405(j) of the former Appendix to Title 50, War and National Defense, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as section 4605(j) of Title 50, and was repealed by Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title XVII, §1766(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2232. For provisions similar to those of former section 4605(j) of Title 50, see section 4813(c) of Title 50, as enacted by Pub. L. 115–232.

#### Codification

Another section 2332d was renumbered section 2332e of this title.

#### Amendments

2002—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–273 inserted "of 1979" after "Export Administration Act".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 104–132, title III, §321(c), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1254, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this section] shall become effective 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Apr. 24, 1996]."

1 See References in Text note below.
§ 682.101 Participation in the FFEL programs. The following entities and persons participate in the FFEL programs: ( a ) Eligible banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, pension funds, insurance companies, schools, and State and private nonprofit agencies made loans prior to July 1, 2010.
( b ) Institutions of higher education, including most colleges, universities, graduate and professional schools, and many vocational, technical schools participated as schools, enabling an eligible student or his or her parents to obtain a loan to pay for the student's cost of education.
( c ) Students who met certain requirements, including enrollment at a participating school, borrowed under the Stafford Loan Program prior to July 1, 2010 and, for periods of enrollment that began prior to July 1, 1994, the SLS program. Parents of eligible dependent undergraduate students borrowed under the PLUS Program prior to July 1, 2010. Borrowers with outstanding Stafford, SLS, FISL, Perkins, HPSL, HEAL, ALAS, PLUS, or Nursing Student Loan Program loans borrowed under the Consolidation Loan Program prior to July 1, 2010. The PLUS Program also provided for making loans to graduate and professional students on or after July 1, 2006 and prior to July 1, 2010.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1071 to 1087-2)
[57 FR 60323, Dec. 18, 1992, as amended at 59 FR 61215, Nov. 29, 1994; 64 FR 18975, Apr. 16, 1999; 66 FR 34762, June 29, 2001; 71 FR 45698, Aug. 9, 2006; 71 FR 64397, Nov. 1, 2006; 78 FR 65806, Nov. 1, 2013]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 607

 616

 614

 630

 656

 658

 657

 642

 650

 666

 622

 648

 622

 633

 581

 532

 526

 506

 544

 525

 542

 590

 625

 615

 584

 582

 597

 589

 570

 568

 543

 451

 444

 420

 415

 429

 407

 411

 427

 475

 460

 471

 490

 472

 469

 468

 456

 442

 461

 475

 471

 468

 484

 479

 497

 473

 459

 450

 487

 461

 453

 451

 512

 494

 483

 489

 503

 508

 527

 523

 554

 556

 550

 553

 532

 532

 523

 503

 494

 484

 509

 496

 508

 543

 556

 553

 528

 516

 516

 526

 516

 520

 495

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 16, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 332

 321

 314

 318

 327

 330

 342

 339

 358

 360

 356

 358

 345

 345

 339

 327

 321

 315

 331

 323

 330

 352

 360

 358

 342

 335

 335

 341

 335

 337

 322

TOTAL 16,102

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
#### Northern Blvd. and Main Realty Corporation, Appellant, v. Anschel Saltz et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 645

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 645 appear at 65 FR 70311, Nov. 22, 2000.

#### § 645.305 Definitions.

For purposes of this subpart, the terms defined in 47 U.S.C. 1504(a) shall have the same meaning where used in these regulations, notwithstanding other provisions of this part or Title 23 of the U.S.C.
EX-4.1



 






Exhibit 4.1







	CUSIP TO COME





 









 








	STEWART & STEVENSON INC. The Corporation will furnish without charge to each stockholder who
so requests the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other
special rights of each class of stock or series thereof of the Corporation and the qualifications,
limitations, or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights. This certificate and the shares
represented thereby are issued and shall be held subject to all the provisions of the Certificate
of Incorporation and all amendments thereto and resolutions of the Board of Directors providing for
the issue of shares of Preferred Stock (copies of which may be obtained from the secretary of the
Corporation), to all of which the holder of this certificate by acceptance hereof assents. The
following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be
construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN
COM — as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT— Custodian TEN ENT — as tenants by the entireties
(Cust) (Minor) JT TEN — as joint tenants with right of survivorship under Uniform Gifts to Minors
and not as tenants in common Act (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in
the above list. For value received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL
SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS,
INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate,
and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books
of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated Notice: The
signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as written upon the face of the
certificate in every particular, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatever.
Signature(s) Guaranteed: THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION
(BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN
APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM, PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15).
### **CHAPTER 95—RACKETEERING**

Sec.
1951.
Interference with commerce by threats or violence.
1952.
Interstate and foreign travel or transportation in aid of racketeering enterprises.
1953.
Interstate transportation of wagering paraphernalia.
1954.
Offer, acceptance, or solicitation to influence operations of employee benefit plan.
1955.
Prohibition of illegal gambling businesses.
1956.
Laundering of monetary instruments.
1957.
Engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activity.
1958.
Use of interstate commerce facilities in the commission of murder-for-hire.
1959.
Violent crimes in aid of racketeering activity.
1960.
Prohibition of unlicensed money transmitting businesses.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2001**—Pub. L. 107–56, title III, §373(c), Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 340, substituted "unlicensed" for "illegal" in item 1960.

**1992**—Pub. L. 102–550, title XV, §1512(b), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4058, added item 1960.

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7053(c), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4402, redesignated items 1952A and 1952B as 1958 and 1959, respectively, and transferred them to the end of the table of sections.

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–570, title I, §1352(b), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–21, added items 1956 and 1957.

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §1002(b), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2137, added items 1952A and 1952B.

**1970**—Pub. L. 91–452, title VIII, §803(b), Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 938, added item 1955.

**1962**—Pub. L. 87–420, §17(f), Mar. 20, 1962, 76 Stat. 43, added item 1954.

**1961**—Pub. L. 87–228, §1(b), Sept. 13, 1961, 75 Stat. 499, added item 1952.

Pub. L. 87–218, §1, Sept. 13, 1961, 75 Stat. 492, added item 1953.
NO. 07-02-0198 -CR IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L C SEPTE MBE R 11, 2002

______________________________ ROBERT BRITTON, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE137 TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY; NO. 2002-438951; HON ORABLECECIL P URYEA R, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before QUINN and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ. On August 12 and Augus t 27, 20 02, appe llant Robert Britton corresponded w ith the Court indicating that he no longer wishes to prosecute his appeal. In a lette r da ted Septem ber

5, 2002, appellant’s attorneyconcurred w ith appellant’s notice to dismiss the app eal. W ithoutpassing on the m erits of t he case , appellant’ s m otion for v oluntary dismissal is granted and the appeal is hereby dism issed. Tex. R . App. P. 42.2. Having dismissed2

the appeal at ap pell ant’s personal request, no m otion for rehearing will be entertained and our ma ndate will issue forthwith.

Phil Johnson Justice

Do not publish.
### §939b. State laws and regulations

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as preventing any of the Great Lakes States from making or enforcing laws or regulations within their respective jurisdictions so far as such laws or regulations do not conflict with the Convention or this chapter.

(June 4, 1956, ch. 358, §12, 70 Stat. 244.)
#### John F. Hunter, Who Sues on Behalf of Himself and All Other Private Consumers of Water in the Village of Mamaroneck, Similarly Situated, Respondent, v. New York Inter-Urban Water Company, Appellant.

Order modified to the extent that the temporary injunction against the defendant shall be confined simply to the cutting off of the water supply of plaintiff and those similarly situated, pending the trial of the action, provided payment is made for said water supply at the rates in force on December 31, 1912, and all reasonable regulations of the defendant have been complied with. If plaintiff neglects to bring this action on for trial at the June Special Term for Trials in Westchester, then the defendant may apply at Special Term for the vacation of the injunction order or the giving of such further security by the plaintiff as it may feel advised. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Order to be settled before Mr. Justice Carr.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN, INC**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

 

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of California Pizza Kitchen, Inc (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2003,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Susan M. Collyns, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

March 12, 2004
exv10w3



 





Exhibit 10.3




AMENDMENT

TO

COGNEX CORPORATION

2001 GENERAL STOCK OPTION PLAN



A. The Cognex Corporation 2001 General Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended by adding
the following sentence at the end of the first sentence of Section 2(a):





“Notwithstanding the foregoing, the number of shares of Common Stock
otherwise available for issuance under this Plan is hereby reduced
by 390,000 shares.”


B. Except as otherwise amended herein, the Plan is confirmed in all other respects.




C. This Amendment is effective as of July 26, 2007.




     Executed this 14th day of August, 2007, by and on behalf of Cognex Corporation by
its duly authorized officer.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	COGNEX CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Anthony J. Medaglia, Jr.
 	 
	 	 	Anthony J. Medaglia, Jr. 	 
	 	 	Secretary
#### In the Matter of the Appointment of Commissioners to Determine the Compensation of Owners of Real Property for Damages Caused by the Closing of Garden Place and Vernon Parkway, in the Borough of The Bronx. City of New York et al., Appellants; Sound Realty Company, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Callahan, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant the motion.
Editorial Note on Part 1244
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1244 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and 68 FR 10357, Mar. 5, 2003.

§ 1244.17 Annual registration. ( a ) Aliens granted Temporary Protected Status must register annually with the INS designated office having jurisdiction over their place of residence. Such registration will apply to nationals of those foreign states designated or redesignated for more than one year by the Attorney General pursuant to section 244(b) of the Act. Registration may be accomplished by mailing or submitting in person, depending on the practice in place at the INS designated office, completed Forms I-821 and I-765 within the thirty (30) day period prior to the anniversary of the grant of Temporary Protected Status (inclusive of such anniversary date). Form I-821 will be filed without fee. Form I-765 will be filed with fee only if the alien is requesting employment authorization. Completing the block on the I-821 attesting to the continued maintenance of the conditions of eligibility will generally preclude the need for supporting documents or evidence. The Service, however, reserves the right to request additional information and/or documentation on a case-by-case basis.
( b ) Unless the Service determines otherwise, registration by mail shall suffice to meet the alien's registration requirements. However, as part of the registration process, an alien will generally have to appear in person in order to secure a renewal of employment authorization unless the Service determines that employment authorization will be extended in another fashion due to operational need. The Service may also request that an alien appear in person as part of the registration process. In such cases, failure to appear without good cause shall be deemed a failure to register under this chapter.
( c ) Failure to register without good cause will result in the withdrawal of the alien's Temporary Protected Status.
[56 FR 619, Jan. 7, 1991, as amended at 56 FR 23498, May 22, 1991; 60 FR 21975, May 4, 1995. Redesignated at 62 FR 10367, 10382, Mar. 6, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 63597, Nov. 16, 1998]