alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 390.30 What additional selection criterion is used under this program? In addition to the criteria in 34 CFR 385.31(c), the Secretary uses the following additional selection criterion to evaluate an application: ( a ) *Relevance to State-Federal rehabilitation service program.* ( 1 ) The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows that the proposed project appropriately relates to the mission of the State-Federal rehabilitation service programs.
( 2 ) The Secretary looks for information that shows that the proposed project can be expected to improve the skills and competence of— ( i ) Personnel engaged in the administration or delivery of rehabilitation services; and
( ii ) Others with an interest in the delivery of rehabilitation services.
( b ) *Evidence of training needs.* The Secretary reviews each application for evidence of training needs as identified through training needs assessment conducted by the applicant or by designated State agencies or designated State units or any other public and private nonprofit rehabilitation service agencies or organizations that provide rehabilitation services and other services authorized under the Act, whose personnel will receive the training.
(Authority: Section 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c))
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 399

 366

 376

 393

 443

 446

 484

 505

 535

 558

 544

 568

 552

 504

 447

 572

 556

 570

 558

 555

 528

 517

 501

 477

 533

 561

 511

 464

 454

 444

 301

 300

 295

 304

 314

 320

 312

 309

 303

 300

 299

 296

 280

 280

 291

 297

 294

 291

 296

 301

 299

 294

 298

 295

 295

 299

 296

 298

 306

 305

 327

 319

 319

 325

 337

 362

 376

 350

 350

 365

 361

 350

 341

 313

 354

 395

 377

 351

 389

 408

 378

 386

 356

 351

 365

 371

 358

 342

 343

 345

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:July 19, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 218

 213

 213

 217

 224

 240

 248

 232

 232

 242

 239

 232

 227

 209

 235

 260

 249

 233

 256

 268

 250

 255

 236

 233

 242

 245

 237

 227

 228

 229

TOTAL 10,664

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
#### § 685.310 Severability.

If any provision of this subpart or its application to any person, act, or practice is held invalid, the remainder of the subpart or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or practice shall not be affected thereby.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1087a *et seq.*)

[81 FR 76089, Nov. 1, 2016]
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

 

**Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Frank J. Massino, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K ofSenetek PLC; 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge,this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this annual report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)for the registrant and we have: 

 

a)  designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annualreport is being prepared; 

 

b)  evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date ); and 

 

c)  presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for theregistrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and 

 

6.    The registrant’s other certifying officers andI have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including anycorrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 540

 533

 531

 541

 545

 543

 525

 529

 487

 465

 467

 493

 512

 501

 475

 465

 484

 486

 480

 495

 503

 490

 485

 486

 483

 491

 497

 489

 472

 475

 472

 481

 472

 484

 482

 478

 472

 470

 462

 450

 453

 449

 459

 488

 468

 447

 446

 446

 458

 458

 474

 475

 472

 471

 474

 478

 481

 481

 474

 461

 461

 456

 495

 500

 501

 514

 508

 512

 490

 483

 461

 458

 458

 469

 499

 484

 459

 456

 466

 476

 471

 483

 487

 479

 476

 479

 482

 486

 491

 483

 465

 465

 465

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 2, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 322

 325

 326

 334

 330

 332

 319

 314

 301

 299

 299

 306

 324

 315

 300

 298

 304

 310

 307

 314

 317

 312

 310

 312

 314

 316

 319

 314

 303

 303

 303

TOTAL 14,901

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 34-82347 / December 18, 2017

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) announced the temporary 

suspension, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange 

Act”), of trading in the securities of The Crypto Company (“CRCW”), of Malibu, California at 

9:30 a.m. EST on December 19, 2017, and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EST on January 3, 2018.

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of The Crypto Company 

because of concerns regarding the accuracy and adequacy of information in the marketplace 

about, among other things, the compensation paid for promotion of the company, and statements 

in Commission filings about the plans of the company’s insiders to sell their shares of The 

Crypto Company’s common stock. Questions have also arisen concerning potentially 

manipulative transactions in the company’s stock in November 2017. This order was entered 

pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Exchange Act.

The Commission cautions broker-dealers, shareholders, and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by the company. 

Further, brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Rule 15c2-11 under the 

Exchange Act, at the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered unless 

and until they have strictly complied with all of the provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer 

has any questions as to whether or not he has complied with the rule, he should not enter any 

quotation but immediately contact the staff in the Division of Trading and Markets, Office of 

Interpretation and Guidance, at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is 

required by Rule 15c2-11, he should refrain from entering quotations relating to The Crypto 

Company’s securities until such time as he has familiarized himself with the rule and is certain 

that all of its provisions have been met. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in 

violation of the rule, the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action.

If any broker-dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, contact 

Katharine Zoladz, Assistant Regional Director, Los Angeles Regional Office, at (323) 965-3998

or Roberto A. Tercero, Senior Counsel, Los Angeles Regional Office, at (323) 965-3891. The 

Commission appreciates the assistance of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and OTC 

Markets Group, Inc.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned officer of Moldflow Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies
that to his knowledge the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 to which this certification is being
furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item
601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item
601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that
the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

Date: November 9, 2005

                                  /s/ A. ROLAND THOMAS
                                  -----------------------------------------
                                  Name:    A. Roland Thomas
                                  Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           9,651
<SECURITIES>                                    26,710
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,931
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (661)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,570
<PP&E>                                           8,099
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,650)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,555
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,029
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         20
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,555
<SALES>                                          7,941
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,941
<CGS>                                            1,605
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 324
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,209)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,209)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,209)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.97)


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 220

 243

 270

 277

 275

 262

 264

 237

 240

 224

 215

 212

 210

 201

 213

 210

 215

 222

 222

 231

 215

 222

 210

 210

 218

 209

 200

 198

 205

 218

 222

 151

 152

 153

 155

 158

 160

 163

 167

 171

 173

 173

 176

 176

 179

 182

 173

 174

 178

 174

 173

 172

 176

 176

 175

 176

 166

 165

 166

 174

 179

 169

 175

 180

 189

 195

 198

 194

 191

 183

 186

 182

 181

 184

 185

 186

 189

 186

 186

 189

 188

 189

 188

 190

 189

 192

 191

 190

 186

 187

 189

 195

 191

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:September 28, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 124

 127

 133

 137

 138

 136

 134

 129

 131

 128

 128

 130

 130

 131

 133

 131

 131

 133

 132

 133

 132

 133

 133

 135

 134

 133

 131

 132

 133

 137

 134

TOTAL 5,824

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
No. 31,083.

#### Ralph N. Marble, *Appellant,*v. The Western Machinery Company, Charles L. Stanfield and L. A. Stanfield, *Appellees.*

(20 P. 2d 628.)

Opinion filed April 8, 1933.

*417
      *W. A. Ayres, Austin M. Cowan, C. A. McCorkle, J. D. Fair, W. A. Kahrs*and *Robert H. Nelson,*all of Wichita, for the appellant.

*P. D. Gardiner, O. W. Helsel, R. R. Vermilion, Earle W. Evans, Joseph G. Carey, W. F. Lilliston, George C. Spradling*and *Henry V. Gott,*all of Wichita, for the appellees.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one by a dissatisfied minority stockholder to wind up the affairs of a solvent business corporation and for appointment of a receiver as means to that end. The petition prayed for immediate appointment of a receiver, and a hearing was had on application for appointment of a receiver before issues had been joined. The court sustained a demurrer to the evidence offered by plaintiff in support of the application. Plaintiff appeals.

Conceding, but not deciding, that the demurrer should have been overruled and that the order sustaining the demurrer is an appealable order, the only ruling this court could make would be that the court erred and the cause should be remanded with direction to overrule the demurrer. The case would then be back in the district court with all the power which a court of equity has to exercise discretion and, after a full hearing, to do what ought to be done.

While the journal entry recites flat denial of the application for appointment of a receiver, the record of the proceedings discloses the comí; had no purpose to end the case and deny equitable relief. On the other hand, the court urged upon the parties a speedy final hearing, and indicated the course the court desired to pursue. This course included remedy for past mismanagement, correction of policy and of abuses of power in management, and supervision by the court over management, to the end the interests of all stockholders might be protected and promoted without extinguishing corporate life.

As indicated, all this court could do would be to reverse the order sustaining the demurrer. This court cannot direct the district court to appoint a receiver on plaintiff’s evidence only, and this court cannot direct the district court not to resort, in its sound judicial discretion, to less drastic remedies in an effort to save the corporation. Since, therefore, this court lacks authority to make an efficacious order respecting the merits, the appeal is dismissed.
§ 3.1 Definitions. For the purposes of this part: ( a ) *ED* means all organizational units of the Department of Education.
( b ) *Embossing Seal* means a display of the form and content of the Official Seal made on a die so that the Seal can be embossed on paper or other media.
( c ) *Official Seal* means the original(s) of the Seal showing the exact form, content, and colors.
( d ) *Replica* means a copy of the Official Seal displaying the identical form, content, and colors.
( e ) *Reproduction* means a copy of the Official Seal displaying the form and content, reproduced in only one color.
( f ) *Secretary* means the Secretary of Education.
### §3737. Record—(Rule)

#### See Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

Preparation, form; typewritten record, Rule 39(b).

Exceptions abolished, Rule 51.

Bill of exceptions unnecessary, Rule 37(a)(1).

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 846.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Rules 37 and 39 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure were abrogated Dec. 4, 1967, eff. July 1, 1968, and are covered by Rule 10, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, set out in the Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
----

**EXHIBIT      **
**32(b)**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                   |                                                                       |                               |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
| Date:              March 8, 2007  | By:                                                              | /s/              Michael R. Murphy |
|                                   | Michael R. MurphyChief                  Financial                  Officer |
§ 607.20 How does the Secretary choose applications for funding? ( a ) The Secretary evaluates an application on the basis of the criteria in— ( 1 ) Sections 607.21 and 607.23 for a planning grant; and
( 2 ) Sections 607.22, 607.23, 607.24, and 607.25 for a development grant.
( b ) The Secretary informs applicants of the maximum possible score for each criterion in the application package or in a notice published in the Federal Register.
( c ) ( 1 ) With regard to applicants that satisfy the requirements of paragraph (d) of this section, for each fiscal year, the Secretary awards individual development grants to applicants that are not individual development grantees under this part, before the Secretary awards an individual development grant to any applicant that is an individual grantee under this part.
( 2 ) For purposes of paragraph (c)(1) of this section, an institution that is a recipient of a cooperative arrangement grant is not an individual grantee under this part.
( d ) The Secretary considers funding an application for a development grant that— ( 1 ) Is submitted with a comprehensive development plan that satisfies all the elements required of such a plan under § 607.8; and
( 2 ) In the case of an application for a cooperative arrangement grant, demonstrates that the grant will enable each eligible participant to meet the goals and objectives of its comprehensive development plan better and at a lower cost than if each eligible participant were funded individually.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1057-1059, 1066-1069f)
[59 FR 41924, Aug. 15, 1994, as amended at 60 FR 15447, Mar. 23, 1995; 64 FR 70155, Dec. 15, 1999; 70 FR 13373, Mar. 21, 2005]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 608

 573

 516

 523

 521

 535

 566

 558

 605

 653

 662

 723

 699

 686

 679

 647

 573

 719

 649

 635

 703

 678

 677

 679

 671

 890

 996

 1,040

 1,092

 1,089

 1,067

 433

 429

 443

 444

 433

 479

 454

 465

 473

 505

 455

 438

 523

 487

 557

 573

 487

 571

 548

 512

 574

 574

 557

 540

 562

 638

 801

 798

 460

 431

 488

 497

 490

 475

 476

 479

 501

 507

 510

 544

 579

 557

 558

 633

 604

 635

 612

 526

 643

 588

 561

 628

 632

 634

 623

 627

 762

 899

 929

 865

 778

 807

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 9, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 323

 319

 310

 310

 312

 326

 329

 331

 352

 374

 360

 361

 407

 389

 408

 394

 341

 413

 379

 363

 404

 407

 408

 401

 403

 487

 572

 590

 551

 497

 515

TOTAL 19,159

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
### **CHAPTER 103—ROBBERY AND BURGLARY**

Sec.
2111.
Special maritime and territorial jurisdiction.
2112.
Personal property of United States.
2113.
Bank robbery and incidental crimes.
2114.
Mail, money, or other property of United States.
2115.
Post office.
2116.
Railway or steamboat post office.
2117.
Breaking or entering carrier facilities.
2118.
Robberies and burglaries involving controlled substances.
2119.
Motor vehicles.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1992**—Pub. L. 102–519, title I, §101(c), Oct. 25, 1992, 106 Stat. 3384, added item 2119.

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–305, §3, May 31, 1984, 98 Stat. 222, added item 2118.

**1966**—Pub. L. 89–654, §2(d), Oct. 14, 1966, 80 Stat. 904, substituted "Breaking or entering carrier facilities" for "Railroad car entered or seal broken" in item 2117.
§ 1210.6 Period of availability of withheld funds. ( a ) Funds withheld under § 1210.4 from apportionment to any State on or before September 30, 2000, will remain available for apportionment until the end of the third fiscal year following the fiscal year for which the funds are authorized to be appropriated.
( b ) Funds withheld under § 1210.4 from apportionment to any State after September 30, 2000 will not be available for apportionment to the State.
#### Emma B. P. Waring v. Childs Company. Joseph Dorf v. Robert S. Smith. Francis Griffin v. Adelaide T. Beach. Elizabeth Passut v. Marion M. Heubner. Benjamin Gibbs v. New York Safety Reserve Fund. (2 cases.) Harry Dunn v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company.

Applications denied, with ten dollars costs in each ease. Orders signed. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
### Cuba and Canal Zone