alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Paula S. Beran, Esquire (Va. Bar No. 34679)

Tavenner & Beran, PLC 

20 North Eighth Street, Second Floor

Richmond, Virginia 23219

Telephone: (804) 783-8300

Telecopy: (804) 783-0178

Counsel for Lynn L. Tavenner, Chapter 7 Trustee

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Richmond Division

In re:

LECLAIRRYAN PLLC,

 Debtor.

______________________________________

Lynn L. Tavenner, as Chapter 7 Trustee,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

ULX Partners, LLC, UnitedLex 

Corporation, and ULX Manager, LLC

 Defendants.

Chapter 7

Case No. 19-34574 (KRH)

 Adv. Proc. No. 20-03142-KRH

NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF HEARING

SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 1, 2022 at 1:00 P.M. 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the hearing scheduled for June 1, 2022 at 1:00 p.m. 

(prevailing Eastern Time) is cancelled. 

PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY.

Case 19-34574-KRH Doc 1362 Filed 06/01/22 Entered 06/01/22 11:19:32 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

Respectfully submitted,

LYNN L. TAVENNER, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE

Dated: June 1, 2022

Richmond, Virginia

By: /s/ Paula S. Beran

Paula S. Beran, Esquire (VSB No. 34679)

Tavenner & Beran, PLC

20 North 8th Street

Richmond, Virginia 23219

Telephone: (804) 783-8300

Telecopier: (804) 783-0178

Counsel for Lynn L. Tavenner, Chapter 7 Trustee

Case 19-34574-KRH Doc 1362 Filed 06/01/22 Entered 06/01/22 11:19:32 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
§ 395.33 Operation of cafeterias by blind vendors. ( a ) Priority in the operation of cafeterias by blind vendors on Federal property shall be afforded when the Secretary determines, on an individual basis, and after consultation with the appropriate property managing department, agency, or instrumentality, that such operation can be provided at a reasonable cost, with food of a high quality comparable to that currently provided employees, whether by contract or otherwise. Such operation shall be expected to provide maximum employment opportunities to blind vendors to the greatest extent possible.
( b ) In order to establish the ability of blind vendors to operate a cafeteria in such a manner as to provide food service at comparable cost and of comparable high quality as that available from other providers of cafeteria services, the appropriate State licensing agency shall be invited to respond to solicitations for offers when a cafeteria contract is contemplated by the appropriate property managing department, agency, or instrumentality. Such solicitations for offers shall establish criteria under which all responses will be judged. Such criteria may include sanitation practices, personnel, staffing, menu pricing and portion sizes, menu variety, budget and accounting practices. If the proposal received from the State licensing agency is judged to be within a competitive range and has been ranked among those proposals which have a reasonable chance of being selected for final award, the property managing department, agency, or instrumentality shall consult with the Secretary as required under paragraph (a) of this section. If the State licensing agency is dissatisfied with an action taken relative to its proposal, it may file a complaint with the Secretary under the provisions of § 395.37.
( c ) All contracts or other existing arrangements pertaining to the operation of cafeterias on Federal property not covered by contract with, or by permits issued to, State licensing agencies shall be renegotiated subsequent to the effective date of this part on or before the expiration of such contracts or other arrangements pursuant to the provisions of this section.
( d ) Notwithstanding the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, Federal property managing departments, agencies, and instrumentalities may afford priority in the operation of cafeterias by blind vendors on Federal property through direct negotiations with State licensing agencies whenever such department, agency, or instrumentality determines, on an individual basis, that such operation can be provided at a reasonable cost, with food of a high quality comparable to that currently provided employees: *Provided, however,* That the provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section shall apply in the event that the negotiations authorized by this paragraph do not result in a contract.
(No. 77-CC-1852

#### Bemon Gartley, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed October 27, 1977.*

Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.,*this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates *264of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
#### In the Matter of Edmund F. Konrady against William Wilson, as Commissioner of the Department of Housing and Buildings of the City of New York, et al.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Reflect Scientific, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly
Report"), we, Kim Boyce, President and director, and Kevin Cooksy,
Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

Dated: 11/10/05                          /s/Kim Boyce
       --------                          ---------------------------
                                         Kim Boyce
                                         President and director

Dated: 11/10/05                          /s/Kevin Cooksy
      ---------                          ---------------------------
                                         Kevin Cooksy
                                         Secretary/Treasurer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 944

 973

 956

 1,026

 1,044

 1,043

 1,000

 1,084

 1,137

 1,080

 984

 920

 871

 838

 872

 864

 894

 900

 892

 873

 854

 836

 804

 771

 788

 785

 750

 822

 797

 797

 895

 877

 872

 902

 891

 890

 895

 1,012

 998

 979

 919

 875

 840

 825

 826

 852

 848

 882

 862

 845

 826

 805

 775

 735

 740

 751

 716

 719

 764

 777

 924

 926

 920

 951

 956

 971

 926

 1,055

 1,072

 1,030

 955

 899

 852

 828

 851

 860

 867

 891

 878

 853

 846

 818

 788

 751

 765

 774

 741

 787

 774

 785

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 587

 588

 585

 604

 607

 616

 588

 668

 678

 653

 606

 572

 543

 528

 542

 547

 552

 567

 559

 543

 539

 522

 503

 480

 489

 494

 474

 502

 494

 501

TOTAL 26,294

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
### Surface geology of the Nash Draw quadrangle, Eddy County, New Mexico

By: James David Vine

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1141B

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (6705 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (3680 pdf)                        
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Geologic map of the Nash Draw quadrangle, Eddy County, New Mexico(1960)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 668.409 Severability.

If any provision of this subpart or its application to any person, act, or practice is held invalid, the remainder of this part and subpart, and the application of this subpart's provisions to any other person, act, or practice, will not be affected thereby.
• I Ki._r. I i-^r 

- .T'DT'-T-r.]. -

< .••\\l\ f w.' ' ' 

I ,- ^^^•;-i •• Tlf i "0 

! -.y i •••: mUiV O 

"^ 3^ 52 

May 16^ 2011 

U.S, Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Essential Air Service (EAS) 

Washington, DC 

Attention; Michael IVIartin 

Development Program 

Re: DOCKET DOT-OST-1999-6245 

Dear Sir, 

Taquan Air has provided excellent mail service to Hydaburg during the past four years. 

We would like this to continue. The carrier is reliable and at times has to operate under 

difficult weather conditions. 

it is our recommendation that a new EAS be Issued to Taquan Air for IHydaburg, AK mall 

service. 

Sincerely, 

Diedra Guthrie 

Postmaster 

Hydaburg, AK 99922 

T 'd QTc;Rc;aSZ.DG 9Mn0UaAH SdSn WdGI tr? T TD3 L I Kew
### §4004. Oaths and acknowledgments

The wardens and superintendents, associate wardens and superintendents, chief clerks, and record clerks, of Federal penal or correctional institutions, may administer oaths to and take acknowledgments of officers, employees, and inmates of such institutions, but shall not demand or accept any fee or compensation therefor.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 848; July 7, 1955, ch. 282, 69 Stat. 282; Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §223(l), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2029.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §754 (Feb. 11, 1938, ch. 24, §§1, 2, 52 Stat. 28).

Section was extended to include superintendents and associate superintendents.

Minor changes were made in phraseology. Words "the authority conferred by" were omitted as surplusage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–473 substituted "and record clerks" for "record clerks, and parole officers".

1955—Act July 7, 1955, permitted chief clerks, record clerks, and parole officers to administer oaths and take acknowledgments.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–473 effective Nov. 1, 1987, and applicable only to offenses committed after the taking effect of such amendment, see section 235(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3551 of this title.
\, ^ 

A D E LTA ^ DEPARTMENT O F 

RANSPORTATON^ 

;(ET OPERATIONS y \ j 

m OCT 20 P U-- 25 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director and 

Associate General Counsel 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

1212 Nevi York Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

202.842.4184 

sascha.vanderbenen@)del ta.com 

October 20, 2011 

Dennis DeVany 

Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis Division 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

.1200 New Jersey Ave, SE <•.,,, 

Washirigton, DC 20590. ,, ' 

Re: Great Lakes Airlines, Inc. 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

Delta supports the EAS program, and believes in the importance of providing small communities 

with reliable air service. On October 14, 2011, in response to the Department's Request for 

Proposals, Delta submitted EAS bids in four markets, and our Delta Connection partner, 

SkyWest, submitted bids to provide Delta Connection service in five additional markets on a 

prorate basis. 

Due to the retirement of our 34-seat Saab aircraft fleet, Delta no longer has suitable aircraft to 

serve the smaller EAS markets. To that end, we are cooperating with Great Lakes Airlines to 

enhance their EAS bids in nine small communities where they recently submitted bids. If Great 

Lakes is selected. Delta intends to assist Great Lakes through an interline and ticketing 

arrangement, participation in our SkyMiles frequent flyer program, and booking capability on 

delta.com. 

Sincerely, 

..«^^ 

.^.^J^^t^ 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

cc; OST-2001-

OST-2001-

OST-1999-

OST-2011-

OST-2009-

OST-2001-

OST-1997-

OST-1997-

OST-2001-

10682 

10684 

5175 

0135 

0304 

10642 

2785 

2785 

10644
Rosebud County

M o n t a n a

W y o m i n g

P o

w d e

r

R i v

e

r

Decker

Coal

Mine

Spring Creek

Coal Mine

T o

n g

u

e

R i v

e

r

Tongue

River

Reservoir

T o

n g

u

e

R i v

e

r

Otter

Creek

R

o

s

e

b

u

d

Cre

e

k

Powder

River

Cook Creek

Hanging

Woman

Creek

Bear

Creek

Trail Creek

Squirrel Creek

Indian Creek

Tenmile Creek

Badger Creek

Pumpkin

Creek

Bitter Creek

Big Horn County

Powder River County

Rosebud County

Sheridan County

Campbell County

Big

H

o

r

n

C

o

u

nty

P

o

w

d

e

r

Riv

e

r

C

o

u

nty

Custer

National

Forest

Crow

Reservation

Northern Cheyenne

Reservation

Birney

Decker

Quietus

Current Energy Development within the WMPP Focus Area

Well Location

Town

Coal Mine

Federally Approved POD

Badger Hills - Fidelity

Coal Creek - Fidelity

Coal Creek - Pinnacle

Decker Mine East - Fidelity

Deer Creek North - Fidelity

Dry Creek - Fidelity

Intermittent Stream

Stream

River

Tongue River Reservoir

WMPP Focus Area

Bureau of Indian Affairs Lands

US Forest Service Lands

County Boundary

State Boundary

0 5 10 15 20

Miles

0 10 20

Kilometers

Scale: 1:288,000

Projection: UTM Zone 13, NAD 83

Base Map: ESRI Corp. Shaded Relief

Rosebud, Big Horn and

Powder River Counties, Montana

1043 Coffeen Avenue, Suite D

Sheridan, WY 82801

(307) 673-4303
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 311

 301

 303

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 280

 281

 287

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 294

 290

 294

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:August 4, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 198

 195

 198

TOTAL 878

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
#### § 300.19 Homeless children.

*Homeless children* has the meaning given the term *homeless children and youths* in section 725 (42 U.S.C. 11434a) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 11431 *et seq.*

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1401(11))
§ 668.196 Average rates appeals. ( a ) *Eligibility.* ( 1 ) You may appeal a notice of a loss of eligibility under § 668.187(a)(1), based on one cohort default rate over 40 percent, if that cohort default rate is calculated as an average rate under § 668.183(d)(2).
( 2 ) You may appeal a notice of a loss of eligibility under § 668.187(a)(2), based on three cohort default rates of 25 percent or greater, if at least two of those cohort default rates— ( i ) Are calculated as average rates under § 668.183(d)(2); and
( ii ) Would be less than 25 percent if calculated for the fiscal year alone using the method described in § 668.183(d)(1).
( b ) *Deadline for submitting an appeal.* ( 1 ) Before notifying you of your official cohort default rate, we make an initial determination about whether you qualify for an average rates appeal. If we determine that you qualify, we notify you of that determination at the same time that we notify you of your official cohort default rate.
( 2 ) If you disagree with our initial determination, you must send us your average rates appeal, including all supporting documentation, within 30 days after you receive the notice of your loss of eligibility.
( c ) *Determination.* You do not lose eligibility under § 668.187 if we determine that you meet the requirements for an average rates appeal.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1845-0022) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1082, 1085, 1094, 1099c)
[65 FR 65638, Nov. 1, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 55651, Oct. 28, 2009]
#### § 607.11 Severability.

If any provision of this subpart or its application to any person, act, or practice is held invalid, the remainder of the subpart or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or practice shall not be affected thereby.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1057 *et seq.*)

[85 FR 59981, Sept. 23, 2020]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 63 (Friday, April 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 18219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7868]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, April 5, 2011, at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS:  This meeting will be closed to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C.
Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:  Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shawn Woodhead Werth,
Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-7868 Filed 3-30-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOSEPH SIMMONS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 309 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of February, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1003

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1003 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10350, Mar. 5, 2003.

#### § 1003.11 Administrative control Immigration Courts.

An administrative control Immigration Court is one that creates and maintains Records of Proceedings for Immigration Courts within an assigned geographical area. All documents and correspondence pertaining to a Record of Proceeding shall be filed with the Immigration Court having administrative control over that Record of Proceeding and shall not be filed with any other Immigration Court. A list of the administrative control Immigration Courts with their assigned geographical areas will be made available to the public at any Immigration Court.
Case 19-72382-FJS Doc 17 Filed 07/17/19 Entered 07/17/19 17:10:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 19-72382-FJS Doc 17 Filed 07/17/19 Entered 07/17/19 17:10:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2