18072 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 63 / Friday, April 1, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

new clean-up goals. In addition, O&M 

plans were submitted for both the 

Facility and Meadow Brook properties. 

The 2004 review also concluded that in 

order for the remedy to remain 

protective in the long-term, the 

following actions needed to be taken: 1. 

updated institutional controls needed to 

be recorded, and 2. Operation and 

Maintenance (including monitoring) 

needed to be conducted regularly [both 

of which have since occurred]. 

The Third Five-Year Review, 

completed in December 2009, 

concluded that the remedy at the 

Norwood PCBs Site continues to protect 

human health and the environment 

through meeting groundwater clean-up 

goals, the establishment of institutional 

controls, and the maintenance of 

remedy infrastructure concurrently 

during redevelopment of the Site. The 

2009 Five Year Review also concluded 

that in order for the remedy to remain 

protective, the Operation & Maintenance 

(O&M) Plan and Environmental 

Monitoring Plan (EMP) must be updated 

to reflect changes in site conditions as 

a result of the redevelopment. These 

have been updated and approved 

(January 2011). 

The Fourth Five-Year Review is due 

in December 2014. 

Community Involvement 

EPA community participation at the 

site has taken many forms. In addition 

to statutorily-required meetings and 

public hearings associated with the 

1989 ROD and 1996 ROD Amendment, 

EPA has participated in numerous other 

outreach activities. EPA conducted 

public outreach during each of the three 

five-year reviews. EPA prepared 

updated Fact Sheets in 2003, 2005, and 

2007. The Fact Sheets were distributed 

to mailing list recipients as well as 

hand-distributed to all abutting 

residences and business owners. Extra 

copies of the fact sheets have been made 

available to the public at the following 

locations: the Norwood Public library 

and Norwood Town Hall. 

In addition, EPA has attended 

numerous Public Meetings during the 

site redevelopment approval process. 

All Community Involvement activities 

required and in association with this 

proposed deletion have been completed, 

including the publication of a notice in 

a local newspaper of general circulation 

regarding this proposed deletion and the 

availability of documents located in the 

Deletion Docket. 

Determination That the Site Meets the 

Criteria for Deletion in the NCP 

The NCP specifies that EPA may 

delete a site from the NPL if ‘‘all 

appropriate responsible parties or other 

persons have implemented all 

appropriate response actions required’’ 

or ‘‘all appropriate fund-financed 

response under CERCLA has been 

implemented, and no further response 

action by responsible parties is 

appropriate’’. EPA, with the concurrence 

of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts 

through the MassDEP by a letter dated 

[Date], believes these criteria for 

deletion have been satisfied. Therefore, 

EPA is proposing the deletion of the site 

from the NPL. All of the completion 

requirements for the site have been met 

as described in the Norwood PCBs Final 

Close Out Report (FCOR) dated 

September 2009. 

V. Deletion Action 

The EPA, with concurrence of the 

Commonwealth of Massachusetts 

through the MassDEP has determined 

that all appropriate response actions 

under CERCLA, other than operation 

and maintenance, routine monitoring, 

and five year reviews, have been 

completed. Therefore, EPA is deleting 

the Site from the NPL. 

Because EPA considers this action to 

be noncontroversial and routine, EPA is 

taking it without prior publication. This 

action will be effective May 31, 2011 

unless EPA receives adverse comments 

by May 2, 2011. If adverse comments are 

received within the 30-day public 

comment period, EPA will publish a 

timely withdrawal of this direct final 

notice of deletion before the effective 

date of the deletion, and it will not take 

effect. EPA will prepare a response to 

comments and continue with the 

deletion process on the basis of the 

notice of intent to delete and the 

comments already received. There will 

be no additional opportunity to 

comment. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous 

waste, Hazardous substances, 

Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Superfund, Water 

pollution control, Water supply. 

Dated: March 17, 2011. 

Ira W. Leighton, 

Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region 

1. 

For the reasons set out in this 

document, 40 CFR part 300 is amended 

as follows: 

PART 300—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 300 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 

9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 

1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923; 

3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193. 

Appendix B to Part 300 [Amended] 

■ 2. Table 1 of Appendix B to part 300 

is amended by removing ’’Norwood 

PCBs’’, ‘‘Norwood, MA’’. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7775 Filed 3–31–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

GENERAL SERVICES 

ADMINISTRATION 

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND 

SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

48 CFR Part 53 

Federal Acquisition Regulation; 

Government Property Disposal; Forms 

CFR Correction 

In Title 48 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations, Chapter 1 (Parts 52 to 99), 

revised as of October 1, 2010, on page 

527, in § 53.301–1423, the second 

Inventory Verification Survey form and 

the source note following it are 

removed. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7810 Filed 3–31–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Office of the Secretary 

49 CFR Part 40 

Procedures for Transportation 

Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing 

Programs 

CFR Correction 

In Title 49 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations, Parts 1 to 99, revised as of 

October 1, 2010, on page 571, in § 40.97, 

add paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (ii) to read 

as follows; and on page 572, in the same 

section, redesignate paragraphs (d)(1), 

(2) and (3) as (e)(1), (2) and (3). 

§ 40.97 What do laboratories report and 

how do they report it? 

(a) * * * 

(2) * * * 

(i) Positive, with drug(s)/metabolite(s) 

noted, with numerical values for the 

drug(s) or drug metabolite(s). 

(ii) Positive-dilute, with drug(s)/ 

metabolite(s) noted, with numerical 

values for the drug(s) or drug 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES