alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 26—DOMINICAN REPUBLIC-CENTRAL AMERICA FREE TRADE**

Sec.
4001.
Purposes.
4002.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—APPROVAL OF, AND GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO, THE AGREEMENT

4011.
Approval and entry into force of the Agreement.
4012.
Relationship of the Agreement to United States and State law.
4013.
Implementing actions in anticipation of entry into force and initial regulations.
4014.
Consultation and layover provisions for, and effective date of, proclaimed actions.
4015.
Administration of dispute settlement proceedings.
4016.
Arbitration of claims.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—CUSTOMS PROVISIONS

4031.
Tariff modifications.
4032.
Additional duties on certain agricultural goods.
4033.
Rules of origin.
4034.
Retroactive application for certain liquidations and reliquidations of textile or apparel goods.
4035.
Enforcement relating to trade in textile or apparel goods.
4036.
Regulations.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—RELIEF FROM IMPORTS

4051.
Definitions.

#### Part A—Relief From Imports Benefiting From the Agreement

4061.
Commencing of action for relief.
4062.
Commission action on petition.
4063.
Provision of relief.
4064.
Termination of relief authority.
4065.
Compensation authority.

#### Part B—Textile and Apparel Safeguard Measures

4081.
Commencement of action for relief.
4082.
Determination and provision of relief.
4083.
Period of relief.
4084.
Articles exempt from relief.
4085.
Rate after termination of import relief.
4086.
Termination of relief authority.
4087.
Compensation authority.
4088.
Confidential business information.

#### Part C—Cases Under Title II of the Trade Act of 1974

4101.
Findings and action on goods of CAFTA–DR countries.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—MISCELLANEOUS

4111.
Periodic reports and meetings on labor obligations and labor capacity-building provisions.
4112.
Earned import allowance program.

#### Termination of Chapter

For termination of chapter by section 107(d) of Pub. L. 109–53, see Effective and Termination Dates note set out under section 4001 of this title.
Trail Rules 

Fort Ord 

National Monument 

Trail use on the National Monument 

To help reduce conflicts, protect wildlife and 

livestock on Fort Ord, and ensure public safety, 

please follow these rules while recreating on the 

roads and trails. 

For cyclists: 

	 Yield the right-of-way to hikers, joggers and 

equestrians 

	 Yielding to others means stopping or 

slowing—never pass others over 10 mph on 

roads and 5 mph of single-track trails 

	 Avoid riding on wet trails to reduce damage 

For hikers and joggers: 

 Yield the right-of-way to equestrians 

 Be careful not to spook horses 

 Remember it is hard to hear others when you 

are wearing headphones 

For equestrians: 

 Avoid riding on wet trails to reduce damage 

 Never bring a skittish horse to this high public 

use area 

	 Never shovel manure into landscaping 

islands—please load back into your trailer and 

take home with you 

For everyone: 

	 Use only roads and trails that are signed 

open for use 

	 Never venture off the roads and trails into 

grassland areas or other off-trail habitat 

	 Remember that the Monument is closed 

1/2 hour after sunset until 1/2 hour before 

sunrise 

	 Never start a campfire or use a firework 

	 Never chase or harass wildlife or livestock 

on Fort Ord National Monument 

Questions? Call Bureau of Land Management 

at (831) 582-2200 

Remember that common courtesy can 

go a long way in reducing conflict and 

ensuring everyone has fun. The BLM 

manages the Fort Ord National Monument in a 

manner that protects natural values, honors 

the military and cultural heritage of the 

landscape, and offers high-quality, nonmotorized outdoor recreation opportunities. 

Your cooperation will help ensure that 35 

species of rare and endangered animals and 

plants that make this place their home are 

protected for generations to come. 
 

Play Nice and Be Courteous 

There are a lot of people out on the trails these days on 

the Fort Ord National Monument and everyone must 

make a special effort to play nice and be courteous. 

Observing the proper trail yielding priorities is important 

for all—bicyclists have a special responsibility to travel 

at safe speeds. 

What does yielding mean? 

Yielding can mean stopping if other visitors don’t move 

to the edge of the trail, or slowing way down if they do. 

Bicyclists should never be travelling more than 5 mph 

on trails and 10 mph on the wider roads when they 

pass others. 

PL Y 

Nice 

BLM/CA/GI-2016/017+6210+8365 

Yielding the Way 

Fort Ord 

National Monument
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Clancy Systems International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  September 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
 hereof  (the "Report"), I, Lizabeth M. Wolfson, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted
pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

	(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

/s/  Lizabeth M. Wolfson
Chief Financial Officer
March 13, 2006


<PAGE>
§ 644.23 How does the Secretary set the amount of a grant? ( a ) The Secretary sets the amount of a grant on the basis of— ( 1 ) 34 CFR 75.232 and 75.233, for new grants; and
( 2 ) 34 CFR 75.253, for the second and subsequent years of a project period.
( b ) If the circumstances described in section 402A(b)(3) of the HEA exist, the Secretary uses the available funds to set the amount of the grant at the lesser of— ( 1 ) $200,000; or
( 2 ) The amount requested by the applicant.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-11)
[59 FR 2658, Jan. 18, 1994, as amended at 75 FR 65782, Oct. 26, 2010]
Exhibit 10.1 - Trust Agreement with George Heard.





Exhibit 10.1

GEORGE HEARD

308 - 837 West Hastings Street

Vancouver, British Columbia

Canada V6C 3N6

 

August 1, 2007

GDJ International Metals Inc.

308 - 837 West Hastings Street

Vancouver, British Columbia

Canada V6C 3N6

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

RE: Declaration of Trust

     George Heard holds in trust for GDJ International Metals Inc., a 100% undivided interest in the following claim:


	  	  	Number of  	Date of  
	Record Number  	Claim Name  	MTO Cells  	Expiration  
	553830  	GDJ  	8  	March 6, 2008  




     George Heard will deliver full title on demand to GDJ International Metals Inc. for as long as the claims are in good standing with the Province of British Columbia.

 

Yours truly,

 

GEOGE HEARD

George Heard, Secretary
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

December 2003

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Delta Smelt Splittail Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day

SWP CVP Total Average SWP CVP Total Average

1-Dec-03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2415 4340 6755 4791 8608 13399

2-Dec-03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1700 4341 6041 3372 8611 11983

3-Dec-03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1955 4327 6282 3877 8583 12460

4-Dec-03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2376 4339 6715 4713 8606 13319

5-Dec-03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2469 4358 6828 4898 8645 13543

6-Dec-03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1983 4379 6362 3934 8685 12619

7-Dec-03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2241 4384 6625 4446 8695 13141

8-Dec-03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1051 4361 5412 2085 8650 10735

9-Dec-03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 513 3784 4296 1017 7505 8522

10-Dec-03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 491 3087 3578 974 6123 7097

11-Dec-03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1157 2723 3880 2294 5402 7696

12-Dec-03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2124 2771 4895 4213 5497 9710

13-Dec-03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3002 3405 6406 5954 6753 12707

14-Dec-03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3933 4212 8146 7802 8355 16157

15-Dec-03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6514 4397 10912 12921 8722 21643

16-Dec-03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6947 4291 11238 13779 8511 22290

17-Dec-03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5916 4393 10309 11734 8714 20448

18-Dec-03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5135 4379 9513 10185 8685 18870

19-Dec-03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4530 4307 8837 8986 8543 17529

20-Dec-03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5530 4345 9875 10969 8619 19588

21-Dec-03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5829 4336 10164 11561 8600 20161

22-Dec-03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6470 4340 10810 12833 8608 21441

23-Dec-03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6984 4359 11344 13853 8647 22500

24-Dec-03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6831 4288 11120 13550 8506 22056

25-Dec-03 0 24 24 2 0 0 0 0 7026 4232 11258 13936 8395 22331

26-Dec-03 0 36 36 4 0 0 0 0 6972 4312 11284 13829 8552 22381

27-Dec-03 0 12 12 5 0 0 0 0 6966 4343 11309 13817 8614 22431

28-Dec-03 0 24 24 7 0 0 0 0 6970 4305 11275 13825 8538 22363

29-Dec-03 0 24 24 9 24 0 24 2 5742 4316 10058 11390 8561 19951

30-Dec-03 0 0 0 9 24 12 36 4 5962 4346 10308 11826 8620 20446

31-Dec-03 6 0 6 9 18 12 30 6 2605 4323 6928 5167 8575 13742

Total 6 120 126 XXXX 66 24 90 XXXX 130341 128423 258764 258531 254728 513259

Delta Smelt Incidental Take Levels

Yellow Light Level = 400 (14-day Average)

Red Light Level = 8,052 (December-Below Normal)

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Tracy Combined
(No. 6849

#### Fargo Beach Home, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 9, 1973.*

Jerome Garoon, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*177Per Curiam.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Charles H. Heist, Chairman, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer of Ablest Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 25,2005 (the “Report”), which this certification accompanies, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Charles H. Heist     Charles H. Heist
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 06-1218 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SCIENTIFIC COOPERATION 

Earth Sciences 

 Memorandum of Understanding 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and SWEDEN 

Signed at Reston and Stockholm 

December 7 and 18, 2006 

 

 with 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 SWEDEN 

 Scientific Cooperation: Earth Sciences 

Memorandum of understanding signed at 

 Reston and Stockholm December 7 and 18, 2006; 

 Entered into force December 18, 2006. 

 With annexes.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned officer of Moldflow Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies
that to his knowledge the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended December 31, 2005 to which this certification is being
furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item
601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item
601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that
the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

Date: February 9, 2006

                                  /s/ A. ROLAND THOMAS
                                  -----------------------------------------
                                  Name:    A. Roland Thomas
                                  Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer
#### In re Monica B. YOUNG, Petitioner.

No. 02-1095.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 10, 2002.

Decided May 6, 2002.

Monica B. Young, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Monica B. Young has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus asking this court to direct the district court to issue summonses in cases previously dismissed by the district court and whose dismissals were affirmed on appeal. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. *Kerr v. United States Dist. Court,*426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted, *In re Beard,*811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987), and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. *In re Catawba Indian Tribe,*973 F.2d 1133, 1135 (4th Cir.1992). The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing that he has no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires and that his entitlement to such relief is clear and indisputable. *Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.,*449 U.S. 33, 35, 101 S.Ct. 188, 66 L.Ed.2d 193 (1980).

Young has not made such a showing. Accordingly, although we grant Young’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we deny her petition for mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR QUARTER ENDED 10/31/2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                  FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                              197,692
<SECURITIES>                                         11,233
<RECEIVABLES>                                         7,053
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                           1,636
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        780
<PP&E>                                                6,774
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      223,215
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                21,171
<BONDS>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                          201,880
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        223,215
<SALES>                                              32,240
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     32,240
<CGS>                                                10,608
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        10,608
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     16,285
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      114
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       8,034
<INCOME-TAX>                                          3,051
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   4,983
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                          4,983
<EPS-BASIC>                                           .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .13


</TABLE>
all_density.xls 6/8/00 7:35 AM

Delta Smelt Salvage

2000

0

800

1600

2400

3200

4000

4800

5600

6400

7200

4/15/00 4/20/00 4/25/00 4/30/00 5/5/00 5/10/00 5/15/00 5/20/00 5/25/00 5/30/00 6/4/00 6/9/00 6/14/00

Salvage

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Pumping X 100 af

14-Day Avg SWP Salvage CVP Salvage SWP Pumping Total Pumping
### §654. Officer or employee of United States converting property of another

Whoever, being an officer or employee of the United States or of any department or agency thereof, embezzles or wrongfully converts to his own use the money or property of another which comes into his possession or under his control in the execution of such office or employment, or under color or claim of authority as such officer or employee, shall be fined under this title or not more than the value of the money and property thus embezzled or converted, whichever is greater, or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; but if the sum embezzled is $1,000 or less, he shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 728; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), (2)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147, 2148; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §606(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3511.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §183 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §97, 35 Stat. 1106).

The phrase "Whoever being an officer or agent of the United States or of any department or agency thereof," was substituted for the words "Any officer connected with, or employed in the Internal Revenue Service of the United States * * * And any officer of the United States, or any assistant of such officer," in order to clarify scope of section. (See definitive section 6 and reviser's note thereunder.)

The embezzlement of Government money or property is adequately covered by section 641 of this title.

The smaller punishment for an offense involving $100 or less was added. (See reviser's notes under sections 641 and 645 of this title.)

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–294 substituted "$1,000" for "$100".

1994—Pub. L. 103–322, §330016(2)(H), substituted "shall be fined under this title or not more than the value of the money and property thus embezzled or converted, whichever is greater, or imprisoned" for "shall be fined not more than the value of the money and property thus embezzled or converted, or imprisoned".

Pub. L. 103–322, §330016(1)(H), substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000" after "he shall be".
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

OMAR KHADR,

Petitioner,

v. Civil Action No. 04-1136 (JDB)

BARACK H. OBAMA, et al., 

 Respondents.

 Misc. No. 08-0442 (TFH)

ORDER

Before the Court are [297] Khadr's motion for leave to file a second amended habeas

petition and [305] Khadr's motion to lift the stay in this case. Upon consideration of these

motions, the parties' several memoranda, and the entire record herein, and for the reasons stated

in the Memorandum Opinion issued on this date, it is hereby

ORDERED that Khadr's motion for leave to file a second amended habeas petition is

GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that his motion to lift the stay is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

 /s/ John D. Bates 

 JOHN D. BATES

 United States District Judge

Dated: July 20, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



We, Michael S. Hedge, Chief Executive Officer, and Patrick B. Fox, Chief Financial Officer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 2, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Datrek Miller International, Inc.



Dated August 15, 2005



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael S. Hedge                                
|Michael S. Hedge                                    
|Chief Executive Officer                             
|                                                    
|/s/ Patrick B. Fox                                  
|Patrick B. Fox                                      
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
§ 222.181 What eligibility requirements must an LEA meet to apply for a modernization grant under the fourth priority? An LEA is eligible to apply for a modernization grant under the fourth priority of section 8007(b) of the Act if it— ( a ) ( 1 ) Is eligible to receive funds for the fiscal year under section 8003(b) of the Act; and ( i ) Enrolls children living on Indian lands equal to at least 40 percent of the total number of children in ADA in its schools; or
( ii ) Enrolls children with a parent in the U.S. uniformed services equal to at least 40 percent of the total number of children in ADA in its schools; or
( 2 ) Is eligible to receive assistance for the fiscal year under section 8002 of the Act;
( b ) Has used at least 75 percent of its bond limit;
( c ) Has an average per-student assessed value of real property available to be taxed for school purposes that is below its State average; and
( d ) Has facility needs resulting from the presence of the Federal Government, such as the enrollment of federally connected children, the presence of Federal property, or an increase in enrollment due to expanded Federal activities, housing privatization, or the acquisition of Federal property.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7707(b))
#### § 606.25 What priority does the Secretary use in awarding cooperative arrangement grants?

Among applications for cooperative arrangement grants, the Secretary gives priority to proposed cooperative arrangements that are geographically and economically sound, or will benefit the institutions applying for the grant.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1101 *et seq.*)