alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly report of The SCO Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q, for theperiod ended July 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert K. Bench, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Robert K. Bench                      |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert K. Bench  Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                                     |
|   |                                     |
| Date:  | September 12, 2003                  |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or any other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dental Patient Care America,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Brad Berrett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Brad Berrett
-------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2005
No. 30,998.

#### The Farmers Union Jobbing Association, *Appellant,*v. T. F. Sullivan, *Defendant;*The Homestead Building and Loan Association, Intervener, *Appellee.*

*(21*P. 2d 303.)

Opinion on rehearing and modifying former opinion filed April 25, 1933.

(For original opinion of affirmance see 137 Kan. 196, 19 P. 2d 476.)

*W. S. Norris*and *Homer B. Jenkins,*both of Salina, for the appellant.

*John Hamilton Wilson,*of Salina, for the appellee.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

Our attention has been called on petition for rehearing in the case of *Farmers Union Jobbing Ass’n v. Sullivan,*decided March. 11, 1933, and reported in 137 Kan. 196, 19' P. 2d 476, to two items of $50 each which, under the facts shown by the record, do not come within the rule laid down in that decision, being two items for rent due and payable by the tenants to the defendant owner on November *1;*1931, which were reached and covered by the service of garnishment summons about that date, and an answer was made by one of these tenants on November 3, 1931, and by the other on November 5, 1931, admitting that they then owed the defendant $50 each for rent due November 1, 1931.

The mortgage held by the, intervener contained an assignment of the rents to the mortgagee, but no demand on the tenants had been made by the intervening mortgagee for the possession of the rents until November 23, 1931, and it was held in the decision rendered that the lien of the mortgagee was prior to a lien or claim under a garnishment process from the date of the demand, when immediately followed by consent or by judicial proceeding to obtain possession of the rents thus assigned.

*451Under this ruling the lien of the garnishment summons would be prior to that of the intervening mortgagee for all rents thus garnisheed before the date of the demand, November 23, 1931. The plaintiff is therefore entitled to collect these two items of $50 each reached by his garnishment before the demand was made. The decision heretofore rendered is modified to that extent but no further, as the next two items were covered by garnishment after the date of the demand.

Appellee suggests this exception now claimed by appellant was not in the appeal nor involved in the original case. It was mentioned in the brief of the appellant, and the action in the lower court included every item covered by the garnishment process and the subsequent stipulation.

The former decision is adhered to, except that it is modified to the extent of the two items of $50 each, which should be paid to the plaintiff under the garnishment process.
Number 7 Pumphouse Water 

distribution

No. 7 Pumphouse 

No. 7 Blast furnace and No. 4 BOF 

Operations 

Indiana Harbor Ship Canal via 

outfall 018
Order entered March 8, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00898-CR

MICHAEL EDWARD HARSSEMA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-80837-2018

ORDER

This appeal is REINSTATED.

Before the Court are appellant’s January 25, 2019 motion to unseal a portion of the 

record, January 30, 2019 second motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief, and 

February 28, 2019 supplement to the second motion for extension of time to file appellant’s 

brief. 

By order entered January 31, 2019, the Court abated this appeal so the trial court could 

conduct a hearing and make findings of fact on the merits of appellant’s motion to unseal a

portion of the record. The Court’s order further directed the court reporter to file a copy of the 

disputed sealed record with this Court as part of the appellate record.
–2–

On March 5, 2019, the Court received a supplemental reporter’s record of the hearing the 

trial court held regarding the sealed portion of the record. During the hearing, the trial court 

determined that the parties should have access to the sealed record, and it provided them with 

copies of the sealed record for use solely in connection with this appeal. On March 6, 2019, the 

court reporter filed the sealed record as a supplemental reporter’s record in this case. 

In light of the trial court’s findings and actions taken during the hearing, we VACATE 

that portion of the January 31, 2019 order requiring the trial court to prepare written findings and 

recommendations.

We GRANT appellant’s January 25, 2019 motion to unseal a portion of the record to the 

extent we will allow the parties in their briefs and any oral argument to quote from, refer to, and 

advance appellate arguments regarding, the sealed record.

We GRANT IN PART appellant’s January 30, 2019 second motion for extension of 

time to file appellant’s brief and February 28, 2019 supplemental motion to the extent we 

ORDER appellant’s brief filed within THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
#### Joseph Fogarty, Respondent, *v.*New York Dock Company, Appellant.

*Negligence*— *res ipsa loquitur.*

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 13th day of February, 1913, granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

Per Curiam:

There is no evidence, of the cause of the fall of the gate which struck and injured plaintiff. There is some suggestion that the wind was blowing upon the day that it fell, but there is no evidence as to the force thereof, nor that it was blowing at the particular time when the accident occurred. A gate placed in the position in which the evidence on the part of plaintiff’s witnesses shows this gate was placed, would remain indefinitely in that position, held by its own weight and by the force of gravity, unless interfered with. There is no evidence of the nature of such interference or defendant’s responsibility therefor. The order granting a new trial in this action should be reversed, and the direction for a nonsuit sustained, and judgment directed in accordance therewith, with costs of the action and of this appeal. Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ. Order reversed, direction for nonsuit sustained, and judgment unanimously directed in accordance therewith, with costs of the action and of this appeal.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                              61,829
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      167,813
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10,926
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   231,031
<PP&E>                                             133,309
<DEPRECIATION>                                      89,774
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     368,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              164,668
<BONDS>                                            107,904
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               328
<OTHER-SE>                                          95,064
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       368,549
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   339,474
<CGS>                                              261,673
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      306,760
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,015
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     35,301
<INCOME-TAX>                                        15,144
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 20,157
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        20,072
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 541

 602

 539

 554

 549

 590

 588

 598

 601

 639

 650

 669

 684

 673

 675

 670

 661

 651

 653

 628

 616

 617

 611

 639

 600

 623

 591

 593

 584

 586

 424

 442

 460

 461

 476

 529

 548

 562

 571

 540

 558

 636

 635

 632

 624

 624

 624

 612

 604

 601

 578

 579

 560

 575

 546

 542

 536

 531

 524

 514

 463

 489

 490

 512

 527

 554

 566

 582

 590

 595

 608

 652

 667

 656

 653

 653

 648

 638

 625

 616

 594

 596

 579

 588

 576

 573

 564

 557

 543

 539

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 302

 318

 319

 332

 342

 358

 366

 376

 381

 384

 392

 419

 428

 421

 420

 420

 416

 410

 402

 397

 383

 384

 374

 379

 372

 370

 365

 360

 352

 349

TOTAL 17,493

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Cristóbal Conde

Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.(S) 1350, as adopted), I, Cristóbal Conde, Chief Executive Officer of SunGard Data Systems Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
that to my knowledge:

1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the Periodic Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information
contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March
7, 2008



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Cristóbal Conde    
|Cristóbal Conde        
|Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
SunGard Data Systems Inc. and will be retained by SunGard Data Systems Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 300.617 Fees. ( a ) Each participating agency may charge a fee for copies of records that are made for parents under this part if the fee does not effectively prevent the parents from exercising their right to inspect and review those records.
( b ) A participating agency may not charge a fee to search for or to retrieve information under this part.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(8); 1417(c))
§ 668.231 Definitions. The following definitions apply to this subpart: ( a ) *Comprehensive transition and postsecondary program* means a degree, certificate, nondegree, or noncertificate program that— ( 1 ) Is offered by a participating institution;
( 2 ) Is delivered to students physically attending the institution;
( 3 ) Is designed to support students with intellectual disabilities who are seeking to continue academic, career and technical, and independent living instruction at an institution of higher education in order to prepare for gainful employment;
( 4 ) Includes an advising and curriculum structure;
( 5 ) Requires students with intellectual disabilities to have at least one-half of their participation in the program, as determined by the institution, focus on academic components through one or more of the following activities: ( i ) Taking credit-bearing courses with students without disabilities.
( ii ) Auditing or otherwise participating in courses with students without disabilities for which the student does not receive regular academic credit.
( iii ) Taking non-credit-bearing, nondegree courses with students without disabilities.
( iv ) Participating in internships or work-based training in settings with individuals without disabilities; and
( 6 ) Provides students with intellectual disabilities opportunities to participate in coursework and other activities with students without disabilities.
( b ) *Student with an intellectual disability* means a student— ( 1 ) With a cognitive impairment characterized by significant limitations in— ( i ) Intellectual and cognitive functioning; and
( ii ) Adaptive behavior as expressed in conceptual, social, and practical adaptive skills; and
( 2 ) Who is currently, or was formerly, eligible for special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. 1401), including a student who was determined eligible for special education or related services under the IDEA but was home-schooled or attended private school.
[74 FR 55947, Oct. 29, 2009, as amended at 82 FR 31913, July 11, 2017]
### §3661. Use of information for sentencing

No limitation shall be placed on the information concerning the background, character, and conduct of a person convicted of an offense which a court of the United States may receive and consider for the purpose of imposing an appropriate sentence.

(Added Pub. L. 91–452, title X, §1001(a), Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 951, §3577; renumbered §3661, Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §212(a)(1), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1987.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 1990 Amendment

Pub. L. 101–421, §1, Oct. 12, 1990, 104 Stat. 909, provided that: "This Act [amending provisions set out as a note under section 3672 of this title] may be cited as the 'Drug and Alcohol Dependent Offenders Treatment Act of 1989'."

#### Short Title of 1986 Amendment

Pub. L. 99–570, title I, §1861(a), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–53, provided that: "This section [amending sections 3672 and 4255 of this title, enacting provisions set out as a note under section 3672 of this title, and amending provisions set out as a note under section 4255 of this title] may be cited as the 'Drug and Alcohol Dependent Offenders Treatment Act of 1986'."
### §1301. Repealed. Apr. 30, 1946, ch. 244, title V, §511(1), 60 Stat. 158

Section, act June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title III, §301, 46 Stat. 685, related to duties and taxes on Philippine articles coming to the United States and United States articles imported into the Philippine Islands. Subject matter is covered by Philippine Trade Act of 1946 (see Short Title note set out under section 1354 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective May 1, 1946, see section 512 of act Apr. 30, 1946, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1354 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 23





                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements on Forms S-8 Nos. 333-73197, 33-57105, 33-57103, 33-70660, 33-25947,
33-6359, and 2-83144 dated March 2, 1999, December 28, 1994, December 28, 1994,
October 21, 1993, December 7, 1988, June 29, 1986 and April 8, 1983
respectively, of Hunt Corporation and subsidiaries of our report dated January
26, 2000 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule,
which appears in this Form 10-K.





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Philadelphia, PA
February 28, 2000
### §3440. Defenses and objections determined on motion—(Rule)

#### See Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

Defenses or objections which may or must be raised before trial; time; hearing; effect of determination; limitations by law unaffected, Rule 12(b).

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 832.)
§ 676.10 Selection of students for FSEOG awards. ( a ) ( 1 ) In selecting among eligible students for FSEOG awards in each award year, an institution shall select those students with the lowest expected family contributions who will also receive Federal Pell Grants in that year.
( 2 ) If the institution has FSEOG funds remaining after giving FSEOG awards to all the Federal Pell Grant recipients at the institution, the institution shall award the remaining FSEOG funds to those eligible students with the lowest expected family contributions who will not receive Federal Pell Grants.
( b ) *Part-time and independent students.* If an institution's allocation of FSEOG funds is directly or indirectly based in part on the financial need demonstrated by students attending the institution as less-than-full-time or independent students, a reasonable portion of the allocation must be offered to those students.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070b-2)
[52 FR 45778, Dec. 1, 1987, as amended at 59 FR 61420, 61421, Nov. 30, 1994; 64 FR 58294, Oct. 28, 1999]
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean TDS

1 690 445 546 353

2 860 472 648 416

3 765 506 607 391

4 552 489 523 339

5 491 471 484 315

6 472 457 465 303

7 457 239 362 240

8 275 190 225 155

9 447 132 244 167

10 485 415 460 300

11 506 460 491 319

12 490 462 473 308

13 560 497 543 352

14 553 146 348 231

15 571 524 559 361

16 602 389 542 351

17 583 145 191 134

18 186 178 183 129

19 181 176 179 127

20 178 103 144 105

21 103 97 101 78

22 143 99 124 93

23 265 140 190 133

24 287 257 275 186

25 287 250 266 180

26 260 229 240 164

27 231 209 224 154

28 221 196 218 151

29 216 195 203 141

30 195 187 190 133

31 202 189 197 138

Total 10445

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Check 21 

Period: March 2023 Run Date: 4/7/2023
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of First Indiana Corporation (First Indiana), that, to his knowledge:



|(1) | the Annual Report of First Indiana on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First Indiana.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                                       
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Dated: August 23, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ William J. Brunner                                
|                       |  |  |  | William J. Brunner                                    
|                       |  |  |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to First Indiana Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 648.33 What priorities and absolute preferences does the Secretary establish? ( a ) For each application period, the Secretary establishes as an area of national need and gives absolute preference to one or more of the general disciplines and sub-disciplines listed as priorities in the appendix to this part or the resulting interdisciplines.
( b ) The Secretary announces the absolute preferences in a notice published in the Federal Register.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1135, 1135a)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 297

 389

 338

 316

 313

 344

 371

 360

 371

 388

 346

 388

 422

 461

 503

 499

 521

 515

 501

 526

 498

 503

 502

 521

 480

 484

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 227

 234

 232

 241

 239

 245

 249

 246

 235

 242

 242

 219

 221

 216

 223

 227

 219

 226

 218

 224

 230

 231

 237

 237

 234

 244

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 256

 307

 285

 283

 282

 289

 320

 306

 310

 315

 286

 292

 299

 300

 304

 303

 318

 303

 311

 339

 333

 326

 326

 334

 327

 319

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 2, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 174

 206

 192

 191

 190

 195

 214

 205

 208

 211

 193

 196

 201

 201

 204

 203

 213

 203

 208

 226

 222

 217

 217

 222

 218

 213

TOTAL 7,973

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20