alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

November-08

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG. Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre Fee

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP CVP Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 397 2,848 3,245 787 5,649 

2-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 420 2,975 3,395 833 5,901 

3-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 446 2,836 3,282 884 5,625 

4-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,957 3,500 5,458 3,882 6,943 5-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,956 3,743 5,700 3,880 7,425 6-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 1 0 0 2,955 3,720 6,675 5,861 7,378 

7-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,687 4,185 6,871 5,329 8,300 8-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,924 4,214 7,138 5,800 8,359 9-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,453 4,211 6,663 4,865 8,352 

10-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,374 4,202 6,576 4,709 8,334 11-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1,996 4,171 6,168 3,960 8,274 12-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,051 4,142 6,193 4,069 8,215 

13-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3,783 3,782 7,565 7,504 7,501 14-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,967 3,603 6,570 5,886 7,146 15-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 1 0 0 2,983 3,607 6,590 5,917 7,155 16-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,901 3,611 6,513 5,755 7,163 17-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,865 2,961 5,826 5,683 5,873 18-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,891 2,696 5,588 5,735 5,348 19-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,077 2,711 4,788 4,120 5,377 

20-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,975 2,715 4,690 3,917 5,386 

21-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,954 2,708 4,662 3,875 5,372 

22-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,937 2,706 4,644 3,843 5,368 

23-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,939 2,699 4,638 3,846 5,354 

24-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,850 2,070 3,920 3,670 4,105 

25-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,866 1,788 3,654 3,702 3,546 

26-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,578 1,445 3,022 3,129 2,866 

27-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,507 1,023 2,530 2,989 2,030 

28-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,426 1,022 2,448 2,828 2,027 

29-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,440 1,021 2,461 2,856 2,026 

30-Nov-08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,431 1,020 2,451 2,838 2,023 

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 3 12 15 XXXX 61,987 87,936 149,923 122,952 174,421 

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Tracy
#### Julia W. A. Siebrecht, Respondent, v. Henry A. Siebrecht, Jr., Appellant.

— Interlocutory judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to plaintiff to abide the event, on the ground that there is no sufficient evidence of adulterous act save on a single occasion at Hawleyville, and as to that the evidence shows that the possible range of vision did not permit the view to which the inculpating witness testified. Hence the finding is against the weight of evidence. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., voted for affirmance.
#### § 668.155 [Reserved]
### SUBCHAPTER I—TRADE POLICY FOR SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Q Comm International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael Openshaw, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

/s/ Michael Openshaw
-----------------------
Michael Openshaw
Chief Financial Officer

November 7, 2003
§ 682.301 Eligibility of borrowers for interest benefits on Stafford and Consolidation loans. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) To qualify for benefits on a Stafford loan, a borrower must demonstrate financial need in accordance with Part F of the Act.
( 2 ) A Consolidation loan borrower qualifies for interest benefits during authorized periods of deferment on the portion of the loan that does not represent HEAL loans if the loan application was received by the lender— ( i ) On or after January 1, 1993 but prior to August 10, 1993;
( ii ) On or after August 10, 1993, but prior to November 13, 1997 if the loan consolidates only subsidized Stafford loans; and
( iii ) On or after November 13, 1997, for the portion of the loan that repaid subsidized FFEL loans and Direct Subsidized Loans.
( b ) *Application for interest benefits.* To apply for interest benefits on a Stafford loan, the student, or the school at the direction of the student, must submit a statement to the lender pursuant to § 682.603. The student must qualify for interest benefits if the eligible institution has determined and documented the student's amount of need for a loan based on the student's estimated cost of attendance, estimated financial assistance, and expected family contribution as determined under part F of the Act.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1845-0020) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1078, 1082, 1087-1)
[57 FR 60323, Dec. 18, 1992, as amended at 58 FR 9120, Feb. 19, 1993; 59 FR 33352, June 28, 1994; 64 FR 18978, Apr. 16, 1999; 64 FR 58959, Nov. 1, 1999; 78 FR 65813, Nov. 1, 2013; 85 FR 49821, Aug. 14, 2020]
### §960. Commissions' functions not restrained by this chapter or State laws

None of the prohibitions contained in this chapter or in the laws and regulations of the States shall prevent the commissions from conducting or authorizing the conduct of fishing operations and biological experiments at any time for the purpose of scientific investigations as authorized by the conventions, or shall prevent the commissions from discharging any of its or their functions or duties prescribed by the conventions.

(Sept. 7, 1950, ch. 907, §11, 64 Stat. 779.)
### [§§1401 to 1407. Repealed. Pub. L. 91–513, title III, §1101(b)(1)(A), Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1292]

Section 1401, acts July 18, 1956, ch. 629, title II, §201, 70 Stat. 572; July 12, 1960, Pub. L. 86–624, §13(a), 74 Stat. 413, defined "heroin" and "United States".

Section 1402, act July 18, 1956, ch. 629, title II, §201, 70 Stat. 572, provided for surrender to Secretary of the Treasury of all legally possessed heroin within 120 days of July 19, 1956.

Section 1403, act July 18, 1956, ch. 629, title II, §201, 70 Stat. 573, set penalties for unlawful use of communications facilities in commission of offenses involving importation or exportation of narcotics.

Section 1404, act July 18, 1956, ch. 629, title II, §201, 70 Stat. 573, granted the United States right to appeal from grant of a motion to suppress in prosecutions involving unlawful exportation or importation of narcotics.

Section 1405, acts July 18, 1956, ch. 629, title III, §201, 70 Stat. 573; Oct. 17, 1968, Pub. L. 90–578, title III, §301(a)(1), 82 Stat. 1115, set out procedure for issuance of search warrants.

Section 1406, act July 18, 1956, ch. 629, title II, §201, 70 Stat. 574, provided for authority to grant immunity from prosecution of any witnesses compelled to testify or produce evidence after claiming his privilege against self-incrimination. See section 6001 et seq. of this title. Section was repealed earlier by Pub. L. 91–452, title II, §224(a), Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 929, with such repeal to be effective on the sixtieth day following Oct. 15, 1970, but with such repeal not to affect any immunity to which any individual was entitled under this section by reason of any testimony given before the sixtieth day following Oct. 15, 1970.

Section 1407, act July 18, 1956, ch. 629, title II, §201, 70 Stat. 574, prohibited border crossings by any person addicted to or using drugs or any person convicted of any violation of narcotic or marihuana laws of the United States or of any State, the penalty for which is imprisonment for more than one year.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on first day of seventh calendar month that begins after Oct. 26, 1970, see section 1105(a) of Pub. L. 91–513, set out as an Effective Date note under section 951 of Title 21, Food and Drugs.

#### Savings Provision

Prosecutions for any violation of law occurring, and civil seizures or forfeitures and injunctive proceedings commenced, prior to the effective date of repeal of these sections by section 1101 of Pub. L. 91–513 not to be affected or abated by reason thereof, see section 1103 of Pub. L. 91–513, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 21, Food and Drugs.
(No. 77-CC-1413

#### Angel Calderon, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed September 7, 1977.*

Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas v. State, 32*Ill.Ct.Cl.__, this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

*239The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             415
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   415
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           500
<OTHER-SE>                                        (85)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       415
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,035
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,035)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,035)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,035)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Michael J. Ruane

Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.(S) 1350, as adopted), I, Michael J. Ruane, Chief Financial Officer of SunGard Data Systems Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that
to my knowledge:

1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the Periodic Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information
contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Dated: March 5, 2009   
|                       
|/s/ Michael J. Ruane   
|Michael J. Ruane       
|Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
SunGard Data Systems Inc. and will be retained by SunGard Data Systems Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear by T.D. ATF-463, 66 FR 42733, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 1.4 Delegations of the Administrator.

Most of the regulatory authorities of the Administrator contained in this part are delegated to appropriate TTB officers. These TTB officers are specified in TTB Order 1135.1, Delegation of the Administrator's Authorities in 27 CFR Part 1, Basic Permit Requirements Under the Federal Alcohol Administration Act, Nonindustrial Use of Distilled Spirits and Wine, Bulk Sales and Bottling of Distilled Spirits. You may obtain a copy of this order by accessing the TTB Web site (*http://www.ttb.gov*) or by mailing a request to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, National Revenue Center, 550 Main Street, Room 1516, Cincinnati, OH 45202.

[T.D. TTB-44, 71 FR 16920, Apr. 4, 2006]
(No. 77-CC-2417

#### Sue Swanson, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed January 9, 1978.*

Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas v. State, 32*Ill.Ct.Cl.__, this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

*270It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
Case 19-35853-KLP Doc 70 Filed 10/02/20 Entered 10/02/20 09:54:19 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 12
Case 19-35853-KLP Doc 70 Filed 10/02/20 Entered 10/02/20 09:54:19 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 12
Case 19-35853-KLP Doc 70 Filed 10/02/20 Entered 10/02/20 09:54:19 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 12
Case 19-35853-KLP Doc 70 Filed 10/02/20 Entered 10/02/20 09:54:19 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 12
Case 19-35853-KLP Doc 70 Filed 10/02/20 Entered 10/02/20 09:54:19 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 12
Case 19-35853-KLP Doc 70 Filed 10/02/20 Entered 10/02/20 09:54:19 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 12
Case 19-35853-KLP Doc 70 Filed 10/02/20 Entered 10/02/20 09:54:19 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 12
Case 19-35853-KLP Doc 70 Filed 10/02/20 Entered 10/02/20 09:54:19 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 12
Case 19-35853-KLP Doc 70 Filed 10/02/20 Entered 10/02/20 09:54:19 Desc Main

Document Page 9 of 12
Case 19-35853-KLP Doc 70 Filed 10/02/20 Entered 10/02/20 09:54:19 Desc Main

Document Page 10 of 12
Case 19-35853-KLP Doc 70 Filed 10/02/20 Entered 10/02/20 09:54:19 Desc Main

Document Page 11 of 12
Case 19-35853-KLP Doc 70 Filed 10/02/20 Entered 10/02/20 09:54:19 Desc Main

Document Page 12 of 12
§ 664.1 What is the Fulbright-Hays Group Projects Abroad Program? ( a ) The Fulbright-Hays Group Projects Abroad Program is designed to contribute to the development and improvement of the study of modern foreign languages and area studies in the United States by providing opportunities for teachers, students, and faculty to study in foreign countries.
( b ) Under the program, the Secretary awards grants to eligible institutions, departments, and organizations to conduct overseas group projects in research, training, and curriculum development.
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6))
CVC Water Delivery Records

Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Red indicates Scheduled Data Green indicates Confirmed Delivery DataBlue indicates Actual Data Deliveries on Behalf of CVC Contractors (5% Allocation)

Nov-16

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Banks 

AF

Article 55 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Banks 

AF

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Tracy 

AF

CVC Water 

Pumped @ 

O'Neill 

AF

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Dos 

Amigos for 

Delivery 

AF

3% Loss Between 

Banks and 

O'Neill 

Based on 

Actual 

Pumping

Exchange 

from USBR 

to DWR in 

O'Neill

Exchange 

from DWR 

to USBR in 

O'Neill

11/1/201611/2/201611/3/201611/4/201611/5/201611/6/201611/7/201611/8/201611/9/2016

11/10/201611/11/201611/12/201611/13/201611/14/201611/15/201611/16/2016 3,110 AF11/17/201611/18/201611/19/201611/20/201611/21/201611/22/201611/23/201611/24/201611/25/201611/26/201611/27/201611/28/201611/29/201611/30/2016

Nov 2016 Total 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 3,110 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 

Notes: 3,110 AF Pumped in October exchanged from DWR to USBR for Lower Tule (1,555 AF) and Pixley (1,555 AF) water going into Federal San Luis Storage.

V:\~WATER\~SMITH\Cross Valley Contractor Deliveries Info\03-2016 to 02-2017\Master 03_2016 to 02_2017 CVC Deliveries.xls
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of McLaren Performance Technologies, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Annual
Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.



December 30, 2002                   /s/ Wiley R. McCoy
                                    ---------------------------
                                    Wiley R. McCoy
                                    Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, D. Elroy Fimrite, President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of Texen Oil & Gas, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Texen Oil & Gas, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Texen Oil & Gas, Inc.                                                              |

Dated:  May 27, 2005
| /s/ D. Elroy Fimrite |
|----------------------|

D. Elroy Fimrite, President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Texen Oil & Gas, Inc. and will be retained by Texen Oil & Gas, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 361.64 Obligation of Federal funds. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, any Federal award funds, including reallotted funds, that are appropriated for a fiscal year to carry out a program under this part that are not obligated by the State by the beginning of the succeeding fiscal year remain available for obligation by the State during that succeeding fiscal year.
( b ) Federal funds appropriated for a fiscal year remain available for obligation in the succeeding fiscal year only to the extent that the State met the matching requirement for those Federal funds by obligating, in accordance with 34 CFR 76.707, the non-Federal share in the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated.
(Authority: Section 19 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 716)
### §3736. Certiorari—(Rule)

#### See Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

Petition to Supreme Court, time, Rule 37(b).

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 845.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure was abrogated Dec. 4, 1967, eff. July 1, 1968. Provisions of such former rule for certiorari are covered by rule 19 et seq. of the Rules of the United States Supreme Court.