alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5164 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the alternative 

fuel refueling property credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2019 

Mr. DOGGETT (for himself and Ms. DELBENE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the alternative fuel refueling property credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Electric Vehicle Charg5 ing Helps Access to Renewable Green Energy Act of 

6 2019’’ or the ‘‘EV CHARGE Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5164 IH

1 SEC. 2. ALTERNATIVE FUEL REFUELING PROPERTY CRED2 IT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 30C(g) of the Internal 

4 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘December 

5 31, 2017’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2024’’. 

6 (b) ADDITIONAL CREDIT FOR CERTAIN ELECTRIC

7 CHARGING PROPERTY.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 30C(a) of such Code 

9 is amended— 

10 (A) by striking ‘‘equal to 30 percent’’ and 

11 inserting the following: ‘‘equal to the sum of— 

12 ‘‘(1) 30 percent’’.; 

13 (B) by striking the period at the end and 

14 inserting ‘‘, plus’’; and 

15 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

16 paragraph: 

17 ‘‘(2) 20 percent of so much of such cost as ex18 ceeds the limitation under subsection (b)(1) that 

19 does not exceed the amount of cost attributable to 

20 qualified alternative vehicle refueling property (de21 termined without regard to paragraphs (1), (2)(A), 

22 and (2)(B) of subsection (c)) which— 

23 ‘‘(A) is intended for general public use and 

24 recharges motor vehicle batteries with no asso25 ciated fee or payment arrangement, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5164 IH

1 ‘‘(B) is intended for general public use and 

2 accepts payment via a credit card reader, or 

3 ‘‘(C) is intended for use exclusively by 

4 fleets of commercial or governmental vehicles.’’. 

5 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

6 30C(b) of such Code is amended— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘The credit allowed under 

8 subsection (a)’’ and inserting ‘‘The amount of 

9 cost taken into account under subsection 

10 (a)(1)’’; 

11 (B) by striking ‘‘$30,000’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘$100,000’’; and 

13 (C) by striking ‘‘$1,000’’ and inserting 

14 ‘‘$3333.33’’. 

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

16 (1) EXTENSION.—The amendment made by 

17 subsection (a) shall apply to property placed in serv18 ice after December 31, 2017. 

19 (2) LIMITATION FOR ELECTRIC CHARGING

20 BUSINESS PROPERTY.—The amendments made by 

21 subsection (b) shall apply to property placed in serv22 ice after December 31, 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
### §436. Convict labor contracts

Whoever, being an officer, employee, or agent of the United States or any department or agency thereof, contracts with any person or corporation, or permits any warden, agent, or official of any penal or correctional institution, to hire out the labor of any prisoners confined for violation of any laws of the United States, shall be fined under this title 1 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 703; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§708, 709 (Feb. 23, 1887, ch. 213, §§1, 2, 24 Stat. 411).

This section consolidates sections 708 and 709 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., as the offense and penalty provisions, respectively.

Words "department or agency thereof" were inserted to clarify scope of section. See definition of department and agency in section 6 of this title.

To retain uniformity words "shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and," were omitted. The reference to misdemeanor is now covered by the definition in section 1 of this title.

Words "on conviction thereof" were omitted as unnecessary since punishment can follow only upon conviction.

The minimum punishment provisions "less than one year nor" and "less than $500 nor" were deleted to conform to the policy followed by codifiers of 1909 Criminal Code. (See reviser's note under section 203 of this title.)

Changes were also made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322, which directed the amendment of this section by substituting "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000", was executed by making the substitution for "fined not more than $1,000", to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

1 See 1994 Amendment note below.
#### § 655.4 What definitions apply to the International Education Programs?

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 68757, Aug. 27, 2024.

(a) *General definitions.* The following terms used in this part and 34 CFR parts 656, 657, 658, 660, 661, and 669 are defined in 2 CFR part 200, subpart A, or 34 CFR 77.1:

- Acquisition
- Applicant
- Application
- Award
- Budget
- Contract
- EDGAR
- Equipment
- Facilities
- Fiscal year
- Grant
- Grantee
- Grant period
- Local educational agency
- Nonprofit
- Project
- Project period
- Private
- Public
- Secretary
- State educational agency
- Supplies

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1121-1127)

(b) *Definitions that apply to these programs:* The following definitions apply to International Education Programs:

*Consortium of institutions of higher education* means a group of institutions of higher education that have entered into a cooperative arrangement for the purpose of carrying out a common objective, or a public or private nonprofit agency, organization, or institution designated or created by a group of institutions of higher education for the purpose of carrying out a common objective on their behalf.

*Critical languages* means each of the languages contained in the list of critical languages designated by the Secretary pursuant to section 212(d) of the Education for Economic Security Act, except that, in the implementation of this definition, the Secretary may set priorities according to the purposes of title VI of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended.

*Institution of higher education* means, in addition to an institution that meets the definition of section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, an institution that meets the requirements of section 101(a) except that

(1) it is not located in the United States, and

(2) it applies for assistance under title VI of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, in consortia with institutions that meet the definitions in section 101(a).

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1121-1127, and 1141)

[47 FR 14116, Apr. 1, 1982, as amended at 58 FR 32575, June 10, 1993; 64 FR 7739, Feb. 16, 1999; 74 FR 35072, July 17, 2009; 79 FR 76104, Dec. 19, 2014]
#### § 6.4 Central records; confidentiality.

Central files and records shall be maintained of all inventions, patents, and licenses in which the Department has an interest, together with a record of all licenses issued by the Department under such patents. Invention reports required from employees or others for the purpose of obtaining determinations of ownership, and documents and information obtained for the purpose of prosecuting patent applications shall be confidential and shall be disclosed only as required for official purposes or with the consent of the inventor.
(No. 73-CC-326

#### Frank O. Carlson & Co., Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Secretary of State, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 13, 1973.*

Frank O. Carlson & Co., Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### MEAD, Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF RAPID CITY, SOUTH DAKOTA, a Corporation, Respondent (EDWIN HOPKINS, Intervener and Respondent).

(255 N. W. 153.)

(File No. 7654.

Opinion filed June 19, 1934.)

*H. P. Fellows*and *Williams & Sweat,*all of Rapid City, for Appellant.

*Demi & Philip,*of Rapid City, for Defendant-respondent.

*Boyd Leed'om,*of Rapid City, for Intervener-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This matter is here on appeal from an order permitting Edwin Hopkins to intervene in the case. We have gone over the record carefully, and, being of the opinion that the intervention was properly allowed, the order appealed from is affirmed.

All the Judges concur.
#### § 106.9 Severability.

If any provision of this subpart or its application to any person, act, or practice is held invalid, the remainder of the subpart or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or practice shall not be affected thereby.

[85 FR 30573, May 19, 2020]
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-3214

___________________________

Iris Jaibal-Ayala

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

v.

Jefferson B. Sessions, III,1

 Attorney General of the United States

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent

____________

Petition for Review of an Order of the

 Board of Immigration Appeals

____________

 Submitted: June 16, 2017

Filed: June 21, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

1

Jefferson B. Sessions, III has been appointed to serve as Attorney General of

the United States, and is substituted as respondent pursuant to Federal Rule of

Appellate Procedure 43(c).
After Guatemalan citizen Iris Jaibal-Ayala sought asylum and withholding of

removal based on her membership in the particular social group of Guatemalan

women, an immigration judge (IJ) denied relief and the Board of Immigration Appeals

(BIA) upheld the decision. This petition for review followed. Because the BIA

adopted and affirmed the IJ’s decision, and added its own reasoning, we have

reviewed both decisions together, see Alavez-Hernandez v. Holder, 714 F.3d 1063,

1066 (8th Cir. 2013), and we conclude that substantial evidence supports the denial

of relief, see id. (standard of review). In particular, Ms. Jaibal-Ayala failed to

establish past persecution based on her testimony that, for some two months, gang

members threatened to harm her family if one of the daughters was not turned over to

the gang for prostitution: though disturbing, the threats were never fulfilled, and were

not so menacing as to, without more, constitute past persecution. See Malonga v.

Mukasey, 546 F.3d 546, 551 (8th Cir. 2008) (withholding-of-removal standard); see

also Lemus-Arita v. Sessions, 854 F.3d 476, 481 (8th Cir. 2017) (discussing

unfulfilled threats); Alavez-Hernandez, 714 F.3d at 1067 (persecution is extreme

concept). Further, insufficient evidence connected these events, or the murder of one

of Ms. Jaibal-Ayala’s brothers years later, to her proposed social group. Because the

record does not compel the conclusion that Ms. Jaibal-Ayala qualified for withholding

of removal, see Alavez-Hernandez, 714 F.3d at 1066, we deny her petition for

review.2

______________________________

2

We do not consider those claims or issues that were not administratively

exhausted, see Camishi v. Holder, 616 F.3d 883, 886 (8th Cir. 2010), or that have

been waived, see Wanyama v. Holder, 698 F.3d 1032, 1035 n.1 (8th Cir. 2012). 

-2-
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OZLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Senetek PLC (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period
ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Frank J. Massino, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and William F. OKelly, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

April 9, 2007



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|                                          
|/s/    Frank J. Massino                   
|Frank J. Massino Chief Executive Officer  
|                                          
|/s/    William F. OKelly                 
|William F. OKelly Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000789860
<NAME>                        I/NET
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     $
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         103,847
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  201,961
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               305,808
<PP&E>                                         154,408
<DEPRECIATION>                                 123,308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 336,908
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,342,387
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                        31,038
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,886,674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   336,908
<SALES>                                      1,768,379
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,768,379
<CGS>                                          899,606
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  899,606
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               506,270
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              74,607
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                287,896
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            287,896
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   287,896
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.01
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6065

STEPHEN LOVE PRESTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District

Judge. (CR-88-111, CA-96-413-R)

Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 29, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Love Preston, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Preston v. United States, Nos. CR-88-111; CA-96-413-R (W.D.

Va. Dec. 17, 1996). The Government's motion to dismiss is denied as

moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JACKIE STETSON,

Appellant,

v.

U.S. BANK TRUST N.A.,

as Trustee for the LSRMF MH Master Participation Trust II, et al.,

Appellees.

No. 4D2023-1636

[February 29, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Maxine Cheesman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502008CA039724. 

Jackie Stetson, Lake Worth Beach, pro se.

Adam A. Diaz of Diaz Anselmo & Associates, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellee U.S. Bank Trust N.A., as Trustee for the LSRMF MH Master 

Participation Trust II.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT, SPLITTAIL and LONGFIN REPORT

June 2015

Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW data Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre Feet

Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval 

Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Jun-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 642 655 1,297 1,274 1,299 2,573 0.0 0.0 0.0

2-Jun-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 n 0 n 321 171 493 637 340 977 0.0 0.0 0.0

3-Jun-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 275 708 983 546 1,404 1,950 0.0 0.0 0.0

4-Jun-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 275 114 389 546 226 772 0.0 0.0 0.0

5-Jun-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 275 622 897 546 1,233 1,779 0.0 0.0 0.0

6-Jun-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 275 178 454 546 354 900 0.0 0.0 0.0

7-Jun-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 275 662 937 546 1,313 1,859 0.0 0.0 0.0

8-Jun-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 276 138 414 548 274 822 0.0 0.0 0.0

9-Jun-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 325 626 950 644 1,241 1,885 0.0 0.0 0.0

10-Jun-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 268 174 443 532 346 878 0.0 0.0 0.0

11-Jun-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 399 651 1,051 792 1,292 2,084 0.0 0.0 0.0

12-Jun-15 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 259 150 408 513 297 810 0.0 0.0 0.0

13-Jun-15 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 259 622 880 513 1,233 1,746 0.0 0.0 0.0

14-Jun-15 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 259 178 437 513 354 867 0.0 0.0 0.0

15-Jun-15 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 282 660 943 560 1,310 1,870 0.0 0.0 0.0

16-Jun-15 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 349 156 505 692 310 1,002 0.0 0.0 0.0

17-Jun-15 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 277 630 907 550 1,250 1,800 0.0 0.0 0.0

18-Jun-15 0 n 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 n 0 366 163 529 725 324 1,049 0.0 0.0 0.0

19-Jun-15 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 282 504 786 560 1,000 1,560 0.0 0.0 0.0

20-Jun-15 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 329 275 604 653 546 1,199 0.0 0.0 0.0

21-Jun-15 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 329 270 599 653 536 1,189 0.0 0.0 0.0

22-Jun-15 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 287 272 559 569 540 1,109 0.0 0.0 0.0

23-Jun-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 141 268 409 280 532 812 0.0 0.0 0.0

24-Jun-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 188 268 456 373 531 904 0.0 0.0 0.0

25-Jun-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 125 267 392 248 530 778 0.0 0.0 0.0

26-Jun-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 188 267 455 373 530 903 0.0 0.0 0.0

27-Jun-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 287 306 593 569 607 1,176 0.0 0.0 0.0

28-Jun-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 377 304 680 747 602 1,349 0.0 0.0 0.0

29-Jun-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 301 310 611 597 615 1,212 0.0 0.0 0.0

30-Jun-15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 377 304 680 747 602 1,349 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 5 0 5 XXXX 0 0 8,869 10,875 19,744 17,592 21,571 39,163 XXXX 0.0 0.0

SWP Fish Facility larval sampling not reported to CVO and CVP Tracy Fish Facility larval sampling ended 6-7-2014. Official data is posted on CDFW's webpage.

Preliminary

Delta Smelt Daily Density

Tracy Combined SWP CVP Combined

DATE

Banks Tracy Combined Banks
**Exhibit 99.2**

** **
| PEC  Solutions, Inc. |                         | 12750 Fair  Lakes Circle |
|----------------------|-------------------------|--------------------------|
|                 | Fairfax, VA  22003      |
|                 |                    |
|                 | 703-679-4900  voice     |
|                 | 703-679-4901  facsimile |
|                 | www.pec.com             |

 

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

**I,Stuart R. Lloyd, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of PECSolutions, Inc. (the “Registrant”), certify that to the best of my knowledge,based upon review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2002 of the Registrant (the “Report”):**

 

**(1)****              The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) [15(d)] of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and**

 

**(2)****              The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.**

 

 
| **/s/ Stuart R. Lloyd** |                  |
|-------------------------|-----------------------|
| **Name:**               | **Stuart R. Lloyd**   |
| **Date:**               | **November 14, 2002** |
|                         |                       |  |

 

----
Paula S. Beran, Esquire (Va. Bar No. 34679)

Tavenner & Beran, PLC 

20 North Eighth Street, Second Floor

Richmond, Virginia 23219

Telephone: (804) 783-8300

Telecopy: (804) 783-0178

Counsel for Lynn L. Tavenner, Chapter 7 Trustee

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Richmond Division

In re: Case No.

LeClairRyan, PLLC,1 19-34574-KRH

Debtor Chapter

7

NOTICE OF (1) CONTINUATION OF HEARING

ON APPLICATIONS AND (2) CANCELLATION OF HEARING

SCHEDULED FOR AUGUST 15, 2022 AT 10:00 AM

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the final hearing scheduled for August 15, 2022 at 10:00 

AM on (1) Trustee’s Application to Retain and Employ Cozen O'Connor as Special Counsel, 

ECF No. 1532 and (2) Trustee’s Supplement to Application to Retain and Employ Quinn 

Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP as Special Counsel, ECF No. 1533 has been continued to 

August 25, 2022 at 1PM (prevailing Eastern Time) with said hearing to be conducted by Zoom, 

absent further order of the Court, with the following registration links: 

https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJIscu2oqDwsGI3MjKXR1eCLyXqMfJ-fyig

Listen-only conference line: 1-866-590-5055, Access Code: 4377075, Security Code: 82522

 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the August 15, 2022 hearing has been cancelled.

PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELVES ACCORDINGLY.

Respectfully submitted,

LYNN L. TAVENNER, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE

Dated: August 11, 2022

Richmond, Virginia

By: /s/ Paula S. Beran

Paula S. Beran, Esquire (VSB No. 34679)

Tavenner & Beran, PLC

20 North 8th Street

Richmond, Virginia 23219

Telephone: (804) 783-8300

Counsel for Lynn L. Tavenner, Chapter 7 Trustee

1 The principal address of the Debtor as of the petition date was 4405 Cox Road, Glen Allen, Virginia 23060, and the 

last four digits of the Debtor’s federal tax identification number are 2451.

Case 19-34574-KRH Doc 1542 Filed 08/11/22 Entered 08/11/22 17:31:07 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1