alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF TREASURER

I, Steven L. Suss, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Excelsior Venture Partners III, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 14, 2009                             
|                                                     
|/s/    Steven L. Suss                                
|Steven L. Suss, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 777

 733

 636

 682

 659

 704

 767

 835

 745

 747

 798

 1,077

 905

 824

 866

 906

 925

 923

 891

 965

 1,065

 1,153

 1,147

 1,136

 1,193

 1,076

 1,021

 1,139

 1,127

 1,133

 999

 433

 415

 391

 377

 394

 396

 377

 646

 734

 742

 602

 418

 386

 382

 385

 368

 436

 392

 399

 402

 402

 397

 404

 363

 375

 390

 380

 390

 399

 430

 407

 494

 476

 490

 493

 504

 539

 543

 743

 741

 745

 728

 624

 549

 561

 576

 510

 672

 676

 695

 717

 742

 756

 745

 633

 751

 687

 687

 718

 722

 740

 665

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:March 15, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 321

 310

 319

 321

 327

 349

 352

 475

 474

 476

 466

 402

 355

 363

 372

 331

 431

 434

 446

 459

 475

 483

 476

 407

 480

 441

 441

 460

 462

 473

 427

TOTAL 19,922

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
Case 18-12566-KHK Doc 36 Filed 08/22/18 Entered 08/27/18 17:11:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 18-12566-KHK Doc 36 Filed 08/22/18 Entered 08/27/18 17:11:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 18-12566-KHK Doc 36 Filed 08/22/18 Entered 08/27/18 17:11:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 18-12566-KHK Doc 36 Filed 08/22/18 Entered 08/27/18 17:11:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 18-12566-KHK Doc 36 Filed 08/22/18 Entered 08/27/18 17:11:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 18-12566-KHK Doc 36 Filed 08/22/18 Entered 08/27/18 17:11:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 18-12566-KHK Doc 36 Filed 08/22/18 Entered 08/27/18 17:11:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 18-12566-KHK Doc 36 Filed 08/22/18 Entered 08/27/18 17:11:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 18-12566-KHK Doc 36 Filed 08/22/18 Entered 08/27/18 17:11:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 18-12566-KHK Doc 36 Filed 08/22/18 Entered 08/27/18 17:11:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
§ 12.8 What transfer or lease instruments does the Secretary use? ( a ) The Secretary transfers or leases surplus Federal real property using transfer or lease instruments that the Secretary prescribes.
( b ) The transfer or lease instrument contains the applicable terms and conditions described in this part and any other terms and conditions the Secretary or Administrator determines are appropriate or necessary.
(Authority: 40 U.S.C. 484(c))
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Garden Equities, Inc., Appellant, against William S. Miller et al., as Commissioners of Taxes and *726Assessments of the City of New York, Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
#### § 648.6 What is the duration of a grant?

The duration of a grant awarded under this part is a maximum of three annual budget periods during a three-year (36-month) project period.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1135)
§ 608.41 What are the audit and repayment requirements? ( a ) ( 1 ) A grantee shall provide for the conduct of a compliance and financial audit of any funds it receives under this part of a qualified, independent organization or person in accordance with the *Standards for Audit of Governmental Organizations, Programs, Activities, and Functions,* 1981 revision, established by the Comptroller General of the United States. This publication is available from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office.
( 2 ) The grantee shall have an audit conducted at least once every two years, covering the period since the previous audit, and the grantee shall submit the audit to the Secretary.
( 3 ) If a grantee is audited under Chapter 75 of Title 31 of the United States Code, the Secretary considers that audit to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( b ) An institution awarded a grant under this part must submit to the Department of Education Inspector General three copies of the audit required in paragraph (a) of this section within six months after completion of the audit.
( c ) Any individual or firm conducting an audit described in this section shall give the Department of Education's Inspector General access to records or other documents necessary to review the results of the audit.
( d ) A grantee shall repay to the Treasury of the United States any grant funds it received that it did not expend or use to carry out the allowable activities included in its approved application within ten years following the date of the initial grant it received under this part.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1063a and 1063c)
### **CHAPTER 313—OFFENDERS WITH MENTAL DISEASE OR DEFECT**

Sec.
4241.
Determination of mental competency to stand trial or to undergo postrelease proceedings. 1

4242.
Determination of the existence of insanity at the time of the offense.
4243.
Hospitalization of a person found not guilty only by reason of insanity.
4244.
Hospitalization of a convicted person suffering from mental disease or defect.
4245.
Hospitalization of an imprisoned person suffering from mental disease or defect.
4246.
Hospitalization of a person due for release but suffering from mental disease or defect.
4247.
General provisions for chapter.
4248.
Civil commitment of a sexually dangerous person  2

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2006**—Pub. L. 109–248, title III, §302(1), July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 619, inserted "or to undergo postrelease proceedings" after "trial" in item 4241 and added item 4248.

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §403(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2057, substituted "OFFENDERS WITH MENTAL DISEASE OR DEFECT" for "MENTAL DEFECTIVES" in chapter heading, "Determination of mental competency to stand trial" for "Examination and transfer to hospital" in item 4241, "Determination of the existence of insanity at the time of the offense" for "Retransfer upon recovery" in item 4242, "Hospitalization of a person found not guilty only by reason of insanity" for "Delivery to state authorities on expiration of sentence" in item 4243, "Hospitalization of a convicted person suffering from mental disease or defect" for "Mental competency after arrest and before trial" in item 4244, "Hospitalization of an imprisoned person suffering from mental disease or defect" for "Mental incompetency undisclosed at trial" in item 4245, "Hospitalization of a person due for release but suffering from mental disease or defect" for "Procedure upon finding of mental incompetency" in item 4246, and "General provisions for chapter" for "Alternate procedure on expiration of sentence" in item 4247, and struck out item 4248 "Termination of custody by release or transfer".

**1951**—Act Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, §33, 65 Stat. 723, inserted "on expiration of sentence" in item 4243.

**1949**—Act Sept. 7, 1949, ch. 535, §2, 63 Stat. 688, added items 4244 to 4248.

1  So in original. Does not conform to section catchline.

2  So in original. Probably should be followed by a period.
§ 386.36 What is a grantee's liability for failing to provide accurate and complete scholar information to the Department? The Department may recover, in whole or in part, from the grantee the debt amount and any collection costs described in §§ 386.40(d) and 386.43, if the Department: ( a ) Is unable to collect, or improperly collected, some or all of these amounts or costs from a scholar and
( b ) Determines that the grantee failed to provide to the Department accurate and complete documentation described in § 386.34.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 302 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 772)
Case 19-72567-FJS Doc 20 Filed 11/01/19 Entered 11/01/19 13:18:25 Desc MainDocument Page 1 of 13Case 19-72567-FJS Doc 20 Filed 11/01/19 Entered 11/01/19 13:18:25 Desc MainDocument Page 2 of 13Case 19-72567-FJS Doc 20 Filed 11/01/19 Entered 11/01/19 13:18:25 Desc MainDocument Page 3 of 13Case 19-72567-FJS Doc 20 Filed 11/01/19 Entered 11/01/19 13:18:25 Desc MainDocument Page 4 of 13Case 19-72567-FJS Doc 20 Filed 11/01/19 Entered 11/01/19 13:18:25 Desc MainDocument Page 5 of 13Case 19-72567-FJS Doc 20 Filed 11/01/19 Entered 11/01/19 13:18:25 Desc MainDocument Page 6 of 13Case 19-72567-FJS Doc 20 Filed 11/01/19 Entered 11/01/19 13:18:25 Desc MainDocument Page 7 of 13Case 19-72567-FJS Doc 20 Filed 11/01/19 Entered 11/01/19 13:18:25 Desc MainDocument Page 8 of 13Case 19-72567-FJS Doc 20 Filed 11/01/19 Entered 11/01/19 13:18:25 Desc MainDocument Page 9 of 13Case 19-72567-FJS Doc 20 Filed 11/01/19 Entered 11/01/19 13:18:25 Desc MainDocument Page 10 of 13Case 19-72567-FJS Doc 20 Filed 11/01/19 Entered 11/01/19 13:18:25 Desc MainDocument Page 11 of 13Case 19-72567-FJS Doc 20 Filed 11/01/19 Entered 11/01/19 13:18:25 Desc MainDocument Page 12 of 13Case 19-72567-FJS Doc 20 Filed 11/01/19 Entered 11/01/19 13:18:25 Desc MainDocument Page 13 of 13
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Ex12f
                               Idaho Power Company
                       Consolidated Financial Information
Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends Requirements



                                            Twelve Months Ended December 31,
                                                 (Thousands of Dollars)
                                         1995         1996         1997         1998        1999
<S>                                  <C>         <C>          <C>           <C>         <C>
Earnings, as defined:
  Income before  income taxes        $ 135,333   $  142,710   $  138,746    $ 140,984   $ 143,078
  Adjust for distributed income of
     equity investees                   (2,058)      (1,413)      (3,943)      (4,697)       (837)
  Equity in loss of equity method
     investments                             0            0            0          476           0
  Minority interest in losses of
  majority owned subsidiaries                0            0            0         (125)          0
  Fixed charges, as below               57,381       58,339       61,743       61,394      62,969

     Total earnings, as defined      $ 190,656   $  199,636   $  196,546    $ 198,032   $ 205,210

Fixed charges, as defined:
  Interest charges                   $  56,456   $   57,348   $   60,761    $  60,593   $  62,014
  Rental interest factor                   925          991          982          801         955

     Total fixed charges                57,381       58,339       61,743       61,394      62,969

  Preferred stock dividends-gross
  up Idaho Power rate                   12,392       12,146        7,803        8,275       8,133

     Total combined fixed charges
     and preferred dividends         $  69,773   $   70,485   $   69,546    $  69,669   $  71,102

Ratio of earnings to combined fixed
charges and preferred dividends          2.73x        2.83x        2.83x        2.84x       2.89x



</TABLE>
(No. 73-CC-312

#### Leonard Sturman, D.P.M., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

Opinion filed August 23, 1973.

Leonard Sturman, D.P.M., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §3109. Breaking doors or windows for entry or exit

The officer may break open any outer or inner door or window of a house, or any part of a house, or anything therein, to execute a search warrant, if, after notice of his authority and purpose, he is refused admittance or when necessary to liberate himself or a person aiding him in the execution of the warrant.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 820.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§618, 619 (June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title XI, §§8, 9, 40 Stat. 229).

Said sections 618 and 619 were consolidated with minor changes in phraseology but without change of substance.
### Geology of the Cosio Knob and Espinosa Canyon quadrangles, Monterey County, California

By: David Leon Durham

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1161H

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Daniel Ray Garcia, * From the 106th District Court

 of Gaines County,

Trial Court No. 16-4669.

Vs. No. 11-21-00200-CR * December 8, 2022

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion,

we modify the trial court’s judgment to delete “causing seriously bodily injury, 

family violence” and condition number “27” and to correct the Penal Code 

reference to “22.02(a)(2).” As modified, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
#### Albert A. Raphael, Appellant, *v.*New York State Realty and Terminal Company et al., Respondents.

Cohn, J.

(dissenting). Plaintiff is suing to recover compensation for legal services rendered in procuring for defendants a refund of real estate taxes obtained in a certiorari proceeding amounting to over $82,000. The lessee of the the premises had the right to institute the proceeding for itself and in behalf of defendants. The agreements of lease, plaintiff’s Exhibits 1 and 2, as well as the contract assigning the leases, plaintiff’s Exhibit 3, upon which defendants rely, were drawn by them. The language employed, that *“*all costs and expenses in connection with such certiorari proceedings ” were to be borne by the lessee of the premises, was not clear with respect to whether such costs and expenses included contingent counsel fees in the certiorari proceeding.

It is urged by plaintiff that the parties for whom he had created the fund knew that such moneys, if recovered, would be burdened with a contingent charge for counsel fees-; that each participant therein would be liable for its proportionate share of his fee and that the words used in the agreements include all costs' and expenses, but not counsel fees. The words employed permit of different inferences and reasonable men might well disagree as to their meaning and effect. A determination of the true intent of the parties in using the ambiguous language was for the jury and not for the court. *(O’Neil Supply Co.*v. *Petroleum H. & P. Co.,*280 N. Y. 50, 55; *Burrage*v. *County of Bristol,*210 Mass. 299, 300; *Lamb*v. *Norcross Brothers Co.,*208 N. Y. 427, 431; *Utica City Nat. Bank*v. *Gunn,*222 N. Y. 204, 207, 208; *White*v. *Hoyt,*73 N. Y. 505, 512.) Moreover in the circumstances of this case, the court should not have barred evidence offered to explain what the parties meant by the expression in question.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
#### § 381.1 What is the Protection and Advocacy of Individual Rights program?

This program is designed to support a system in each State to protect the legal and human rights of eligible individuals with disabilities.

(Authority: Section 509(a) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 794e(a))
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                                  Certification
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
                                     Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Excelsior Venture Partners III, LLC (the "Company"),
does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2004 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: June 14, 2004                      /s/ Douglas A. Lindgren
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Name: Douglas A. Lindgren
                                         Title: Chief Executive Officer


Date: June 14, 2004                      /s/ Robert F. Aufenanger
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Name: Robert F. Aufenanger
                                         Title: Treasurer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Annie Hirschfield, Appellant, v. Keith & Proctor Amusement Company, Respondent.

Order reversed, motion granted and complaint dismissed unless plaintiff pays costs of the former action within thirty days from the date of service of the order of this court on her; in which ease the motion will be denied, with ten dollars costs. No costs of this appeal. Order to be settled on notice. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
### §460xx–2. Management plan

#### (a) Development of plan

No later than 2 years after November 18, 1988, the Secretary shall develop a comprehensive plan for the long-range management and protection of the conservation area. The plan shall be developed with full opportunity for public participation and comment, and shall contain provisions designed to assure protection of the riparian area and the aquatic, wildlife, archeological, paleontological, scientific, cultural, educational, and recreation resources and values of the conservation area.

#### (b) Recommendations

The Secretary shall, in the comprehensive plan referred to in subsection (a), develop recommendations to Congress on whether additional lands should be included in the conservation area.

#### (c) Cooperative agreements

The Secretary may enter into cooperative agreements with appropriate State and local agencies, pursuant to section 1737(b) of title 43, to better implement the plan developed pursuant to subsection (a).

#### (d) Research

In order to assist in the development of appropriate management strategies for the conservation area, the Secretary may authorize research on matters including the environmental, biological, hydrological, and cultural resources of the conservation area, pursuant to section 1737(a) of title 43.

(Pub. L. 100–696, title I, §103, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4572.)