alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §224. Bribery in sporting contests

(a) Whoever carries into effect, attempts to carry into effect, or conspires with any other person to carry into effect any scheme in commerce to influence, in any way, by bribery any sporting contest, with knowledge that the purpose of such scheme is to influence by bribery that contest, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

(b) This section shall not be construed as indicating an intent on the part of Congress to occupy the field in which this section operates to the exclusion of a law of any State, territory, Commonwealth, or possession of the United States, and no law of any State, territory, Commonwealth, or possession of the United States, which would be valid in the absence of the section shall be declared invalid, and no local authorities shall be deprived of any jurisdiction over any offense over which they would have jurisdiction in the absence of this section.

(c) As used in this section—

(1) The term "scheme in commerce" means any scheme effectuated in whole or in part through the use in interstate or foreign commerce of any facility for transportation or communication;

(2) The term "sporting contest" means any contest in any sport, between individual contestants or teams of contestants (without regard to the amateur or professional status of the contestants therein), the occurrence of which is publicly announced before its occurrence;

(3) The term "person" means any individual and any partnership, corporation, association, or other entity.

(Added Pub. L. 88–316, §1(a), June 6, 1964, 78 Stat. 203; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $10,000".
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

NORFOLK DIVISION

)

In re ) Chapter 7

)

THOMAS LEE COLE, ) Case No. 16-71348-SCS

)

					Debtor(s) ) BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

) STEPHEN C ST JOHN

REQUEST OF RECOVERY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS CORPORATION

FOR SERVICE OF NOTICES PURSUANT TO FED. R. BANKR. P. 2002(g)

				PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Recovery Management Systems Corporation, as authorized agent for

Synchrony Bank (Walmart Credit Card [Last four digit of account:5718]), a creditor in the

above-captioned chapter 7 case, requests, pursuant to Rules 2002 and 9007 of the Federal Rules of

Bankruptcy Procedure (the Bankruptcy Rules) and sections 102(1), 342 and 1109(b) of title 11 of the

United States Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101, et seq. (as amended, the Bankruptcy Code), that all notices given or

required to be given and all papers served or required to be served in this case be also given to and served,

whether electronically or otherwise, on: 

Synchrony Bank

c/o Recovery Management Systems Corporation

25 SE 2nd Avenue, Suite 1120

Miami, FL 33131-1605

Telephone: (305) 379-7674

Facsimile: (305) 374-8113

E-mail: claims@recoverycorp.com

Dated: Miami, Florida

April 28, 2016

By: /s/ Ramesh Singh

Ramesh Singh

c/o Recovery Management Systems

Corporation

Financial Controller

25 SE 2nd Avenue, Suite 1120

Miami, FL 33131-1605

(305) 379-7674

Assignee Creditor: Walmart Credit Card [Last four digit of account:5718]

Case 16-71348-SCS Doc 18 Filed 04/28/16 Entered 04/28/16 14:32:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
### §4106A. Transfer of offenders on parole; parole of offenders transferred

(a) Upon the receipt of an offender who is on parole from the authorities of a foreign country, the Attorney General shall assign the offender to the United States Parole Commission for supervision.

(b)(1)(A) The United States Parole Commission shall, without unnecessary delay, determine a release date and a period and conditions of supervised release for an offender transferred to the United States to serve a sentence of imprisonment, as though the offender were convicted in a United States district court of a similar offense.

(B) In making such determination, the United States Parole Commission shall consider—

(i) any recommendation of the United States Probation Service, including any recommendation as to the applicable guideline range; and

(ii) any documents provided by the transferring country;

relating to that offender.

(C) The combined periods of imprisonment and supervised release that result from such determination shall not exceed the term of imprisonment imposed by the foreign court on that offender.

(D) The duties conferred on a United States probation officer with respect to a defendant by section 3552 of this title shall, with respect to an offender so transferred, be carried out by the United States Probation Service.

(2)(A) A determination by the United States Parole Commission under this subsection may be appealed to the United States court of appeals for the circuit in which the offender is imprisoned at the time of the determination of such Commission. Notice of appeal must be filed not later than 45 days after receipt of notice of such determination.

(B) The court of appeals shall decide and dispose of the appeal in accordance with section 3742 of this title as though the determination appealed had been a sentence imposed by a United States district court.

(3) During the supervised release of an offender under this subsection, the United States district court for the district in which the offender resides shall supervise the offender.

(c) This section shall apply only to offenses committed on or after November 1, 1987.

(Added Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7101(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4415; amended Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXV, §§3599B, 3599C, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4931, 4932.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Pub. L. 101–647, §3599B, inserted "of" before second reference to "offenders" in section catchline.

Subsec. (b)(1)(C). Pub. L. 101–647, §3599C, inserted period at end.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

October 1, 2003

DAILY CVP WATER SUPPLY REPORT

SEPTEMBER 30, 2003 RUN DATE:

RESERVOIR RELEASES IN CUBIC FEET/SECOND

TRINITY

SACRAMENTO

FEATHER

AMERICAN

STANISLAUS

SAN JOAQUIN

LEWISTON

KESWICK

OROVILLE (SWP)

NIMBUS

GOODWIN

FRIANT

RESERVOIR MEDIAN 2002 2003 15

 450

 7,027

 2,750

 1,503

 132

 210

 450

 7,035

 2,500

 1,748

 208

 220

RESERVOIR CAPACITY YR AVG

TRINITY

SHASTA

OROVILLE (SWP)

FOLSOM

NEW MELONES

FED. SAN LUIS

2002 2003

 1,500

 2,558

 1,400

 510

 1,278

 294

 1,881

 3,159

 2,284

 658

 1,280

 286

 15

STORAGE IN MAJOR RESERVOIRS IN THOUSANDS OF ACRE-FEET

MILLERTON 

TOT. N. CVP 

 221 215

 6,140 7,264

2,448

4,552

3,538

977

2,420

966

520

11,360

% OF 15YR AVG 

RESERVOIR

CURRENT

YR AVG

TRINITY

SHASTA

FOLSOM

NEW MELONES

1983

 2,888

 10,794

 6,541

 2,747

 1,799

 6,363

 2,402

 892

 15

MILLERTON 1,414 4,705

DRIEST % OF

ACCUMULATED INFLOW FOR WATER YEAR TO DATE IN THOUSANDS OF ACRE-FEET

WY WY 

WETTEST

WY 

YR

AVG

 15

2003 1977

DAM YR

RESERVOIR

CURRENT

TRINITY AT

FISH HATCHERY

SACRAMENTO AT

SHASTA DAM 

AMERICAN AT 

BLUE CANYON

STANISLAUS AT

NEW MELONES

1983

 58.58

 116.63

 105.60

 46.79

 0.00

 0.00

 0.00

 0.00

SAN JOAQUIN AT

HUNTINGTON LK 

 85.00 0.00

DRIEST 

ACCUMULATED PRECIPITATION FOR WATER YEAR TO DATE IN INCHES

WY WY 

WETTEST

WY 

% OF

2003 1977 AVG

AVG

(N YRS)

 225

 2,628

 356

 0

 377

 16.35

 26.44

 18.28

 0.00

 17.60

 38.26

 75.15

 56.23

 25.93

 43.15

 450

 6,540

 2,500

 1,503

 223

 199

 1,529 123

 2,544

 2,033

 506

 1,188

 285

 221

 6,052

 124

 112

 130

 108

 100

 97

 120

 32.95

 1,354

 5,916

 2,699

 1,057

 1,724

 133

 108

 89

 84

 82

 116

 63.68

 65.33

 26.63

 44.10

 118

 86

 97

 98

 41

 46

 28

 25

 28

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

 LAST 

24 HRS
§ 75.732 Records related to performance. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70334 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) A grantee shall keep records of significant project experiences and results.
( b ) The grantee shall use the records under paragraph (a) to: ( 1 ) Determine progress in accomplishing project objectives; and
( 2 ) Revise those objectives, if necessary. (Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1880-0513) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)


Cross Reference:
See 2 CFR 200.308, Revision of budget and program plans. [45 FR 22497, Apr. 3, 1980. Redesignated at 45 FR 77368, Nov. 21, 1980, as amended at 53 FR 49143, Dec. 6, 1988]
§ 303.3 Applicable regulations. ( a ) The following regulations apply to this part: ( 1 ) The regulations in this part 303.
( 2 ) EDGAR, including 34 CFR parts 76 (except for § 76.103), 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, and 86.
( 3 ) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted in part 3474, and the OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as adopted in 2 CFR part 3485.
( b ) In applying the regulations cited in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, any reference to— ( 1 ) *State educational agency* means the lead agency under this part; and
( 2 ) Education records or records means early intervention records.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221(b), 1221e-3, 1431-1444)
[76 FR 60244, Sept. 28, 2011, as amended at 79 FR 76097, Dec. 19, 2014
EXHIBIT 11

                          ULTICOM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                   (UNAUDITED)
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                        THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                             APRIL 30, 1999            APRIL 30, 2000
<S>                                                                              <C>                   <C>
Basic earnings per share:

     Net income                                                                  $     251             $       961
                                                                                 =========             ===========

Weighted average number of outstanding common shares                                32,727                  34,100
                                                                                 =========             ===========

Basic earnings per share                                                         $    0.01             $      0.03
                                                                                 =========             ===========


Diluted earnings per share:

     Net income                                                                  $     251             $       961
                                                                                 =========             ===========


Weighted average number of outstanding common shares                                32,727                  34,100
Additional shares assuming exercise of stock options                                   807                   2,320
                                                                                 ---------             -----------


Weighted average number of outstanding common shares
     assuming full dilution                                                         33,534                  36,420
                                                                                 =========             ===========

Diluted earnings per share                                                       $    0.01             $      0.03
                                                                                 =========             ===========
</TABLE>

                            Page 15 of 15 Total Pages
EXHIBIT 21

                           Description of Subsidiaries

                                               Jurisdiction of incorporation
Name of Subsidiary                             or organization
------------------                             ---------------

1. American Flying Crane Corporation           Delaware
   (formerly called American Dairy
   Holdings,Inc.)


2  Heilongjiang Feihe Dairy Co., Limited       Kedong County,
                                               Heilongjiang  Province
                                               The People's Republic of China

3. Heilongjiang Sanhao Dairy Co., Limited      Kedong County,
                                               Heilongjiang  Province
                                               The People's Republic of China

4. BaiQuan Feihe Dairy Co., Limited            BaiQuan County,
                                               Heilongjiang  Province
                                               The People's Republic of China
### §723. Purposes of refuge; regulations by Secretary of the Interior

The refuge shall be established and maintained (a) as a refuge and breeding place for migratory birds included in the terms of the convention between the United States and Great Britain for the protection of migratory birds, concluded August 16, 1916, and (b) to such extent as the Secretary of the Interior may by regulations prescribe, as a refuge and breeding place for other wild birds, game animals, fur-bearing animals, and for the conservation of wild flowers and aquatic plants, and (c) to such extent as the Secretary of the Interior may by regulations prescribe as a refuge and breeding place for fish and other aquatic animal life.

(June 7, 1924, ch. 346, §3, 43 Stat. 650; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. II, §4(e), (f), eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2731, 53 Stat. 1433.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Reorg. Plan No. III of 1940, §3, eff. June 30, 1940, 5 F.R. 2108, 54 Stat. 1232, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, consolidated Bureau of Fisheries and Bureau of Biological Survey into one agency in Department of the Interior to be known as Fish and Wildlife Service.

Reorg. Plan No. II of 1939, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, transferred Bureau of Fisheries in Department of Commerce and its functions to Department of the Interior; transferred functions of Secretary of Commerce relating to protection of fur-bearing animals to Secretary of the Interior; and transferred functions of Secretary of Agriculture relating to conservation of wildlife, game, and migratory birds to Secretary of the Interior.
### §690. Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge; establishment; acquisition of lands

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to construct, at Bear River Bay and vicinity, Utah, such dikes, ditches, spillways, buildings, and improvements as may be necessary, in his judgment, for the establishment of a suitable refuge and feeding and breeding grounds for migratory wild fowl; also to acquire, by purchase, gift, or lease, water rights and privately owned lands, including the improvements thereon, deemed necessary by him for the purpose, or, in lieu of purchase, to compensate any owner for any damage sustained by reason of the submergence of his lands.

(Apr. 23, 1928, ch. 413, §1, 45 Stat. 448; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. II, §4(f), eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2731, 53 Stat. 1433.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Reorg. Plan No. II of 1939, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, transferred functions of Secretary of Agriculture relating to conservation of wildlife, game, and migratory birds to Secretary of the Interior.
#### § 668.50 Severability.

If any provision of this subpart or its application to any person, act, or practice is held invalid, the remainder of the subpart or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or practice shall not be affected thereby.

[84 FR 58933, Nov. 1, 2019]
§ 303.444 Hearing rights. ( a ) *General.* Any party to a hearing conducted pursuant to §§ 303.440 through 303.445, or an appeal conducted pursuant to § 303.446, has the right to— ( 1 ) Be accompanied and advised by counsel and by individuals with special knowledge or training with respect to the problems of infants or toddlers with disabilities;
( 2 ) Present evidence and confront, cross-examine, and compel the attendance of witnesses;
( 3 ) Prohibit the introduction of any evidence at the hearing that has not been disclosed to that party at least five business days before the hearing;
( 4 ) Obtain a written or, at the option of the parents, electronic, verbatim record of the hearing; and
( 5 ) Obtain written or, at the option of the parents, electronic findings of fact and decisions.
( b ) *Additional disclosure of information.* ( 1 ) At least five business days prior to a hearing conducted pursuant to § 303.443(a), each party must disclose to all other parties all evaluations completed by that date and recommendations based on the offering party's evaluations that the party intends to use at the hearing.
( 2 ) A hearing officer may bar any party that fails to comply with paragraph (b)(1) of this section from introducing the relevant evaluation or recommendation at the hearing without the consent of the other party.
( c ) *Parental rights at hearings.* Parents involved in hearings must— ( 1 ) Be given the right to open the hearing to the public; and
( 2 ) Receive a copy of the record of the hearing and the findings of fact and decisions described in paragraphs (a)(4) and (a)(5) of this section at no cost.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1415(f)(2), 1415(h), 1439)
#### Donna Lee H. Williams, Respondent, v Goldy Feig, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[828 NYS2d 64]

In an action, inter alia, to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Goldy Feig appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), dated May 10, 2005, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the second amended complaint as time-barred and as barred by the statute of frauds.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant met her initial burden of establishing her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs.,*46 NY2d 1065, 1066 [1979]; *461
      *Khaghan v Rye Town Park Commn.,*8 AD3d 447 [2004]) as to the statute of limitations and the statute of frauds. In opposition, however, the plaintiff submitted evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the appellant should be equitably estopped from asserting as defenses both the statute of limitations *(see Zumpano v Quinn,*6 NY3d 666, 673 [2006]; *Simcuski v Saeli,*44 NY2d 442, 449 [1978]) and the statute of frauds *(see generally McKinley v Hessen,*202 NY 24, 29-30 [1911]; *Greene v First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. of Rochester,*122 AD2d 593, 594 [1986]; *St. Paul Indus. Park v New York State Urban Dev. Corp.,*63 AD2d 822, 823 [1978]; *Fletcher v Manhattan Life Ins. Co.,*197 App Div 484, 488 [1921]). Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Mastro and Dillon, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       4,073,427
<SECURITIES>                                 4,370,213
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,981,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                   317,458
<INVENTORY>                                  3,455,799
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,064,652
<PP&E>                                       8,703,021
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,142,467
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,569,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,638,502
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,851
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,339,775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,569,806
<SALES>                                     34,863,609
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,863,609
<CGS>                                       31,851,996
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               35,024,952
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (874,617)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             272,473
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (161,343)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (145,562)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,781)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,781)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.004)
        

</TABLE>
#### American Bank of Beatrice et al. v. Lancelot Hand.

Filed November 9, 1899.

No. 9,045.

1. Default: Trial: Erroneous Rulings: Review. Alleged errors in rulings during the trial of a cause, or which are of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings and judgment, will not be reviewed in a proceeding in error or appeal by or for a party against whom the judgment was on default.

2. Joint Assignments of Error. Joint assignments of error in a petition not'good as to all who join must be overruled. See *Levy v. South Omaha Savings Bank,*57 Nebr., 312, 77 N. W. Rep., 769.

Error from the district court of Gage county. Tried below before Letton, J.

*Affirmed.*

*Griggs, Rinaker & Bill*and *George A. Murphy,*for plaintiff in error.

*Eastings & Sands*and *E. O. Eretsinger, contra.*

Harrison, C. J.

In this action, commenced in the district court of Gage county, in which the plaintiffs in error were defendants, judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant in error .for an amount asserted by him, and adjudged by the court, to be his due from the adverse parties. The bank, a plaintiff in error, failed to plead, and the judgment against it was on default. All parties against whom there was judgment, inclusive of the bank, have joined in a petition in error; and, in the argument before this court, the questions raised relate to no matter except alleged errors of occurrence during the trial of the cause, and the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings and judgment, none of which are subject to review in a proceeding in error on behalf of a party against whom the jiidgment was on default. A consequence of this is the petition in error must be overruled as to the bank, and, not being good as to one who joins *274as a party, it fails, and must be overruled as to all. See *Levy v. South Omaha Savings Bank,*57 Nebr., 312, 77 N. W. Rep., 769, and cases cited therein. That a judgment on default will not be reviewed in relation to the questions herein urged, see *Troup v. Horbach,*53 Nebr., 795, 74 N. W. Rep., 326; 6 Ency. Pl. & Pr., 223. The judgment is

Affirmed.