alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, James D. Bowden, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Excelsior Venture Partners III, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 17, 2009                                  
|                                                      
|/s/    James D. Bowden                                
|James D. Bowden, President and Chief Executive
Officer
### Negative Declaration In 2006, 2007, and 2008, EPAissued control technique guidelines (CTGs) for Group II, 111, and IVsource categories, respectively. Ofthe 11 source categories for which new CTGs were issued, NH DES did not adopt a VOCRACT regulation for the following:

. Large Appliance Coatings; and Automobile and Light Duty Truck Assembly Coatings. NH DES hereby declares that no such major sources or sources for which RACT is applicable are present in New Hampshire. This declaration is based on periodic field inspections, a comprehensive air permitting program, and a search by SIC and NAICS code ofdatabases maintained both by NH DES and by the New Hampshire Manufacturers' Association. Asurvey was made offacilities with reported SIC or NAICS codes indicating that they might conduct Large Appliance Coating operations. Upon questioning, it was determined that none of the facilities was subject to the CTG .
#### § 668.230 Scope and purpose.

This subpart establishes regulations that apply to an institution that offers comprehensive transition and postsecondary programs to students with intellectual disabilities. Students enrolled in these programs are eligible for Federal financial assistance under the Federal Pell Grant, FSEOG, and FWS programs. Except for provisions related to needs analysis, the Secretary may waive any Title IV, HEA program requirement related to the Federal Pell Grant, FSEOG, and FWS programs or institutional eligibility, to ensure that students with intellectual disabilities remain eligible for funds under these assistance programs. However, unless provided in this subpart or subsequently waived by the Secretary, students with intellectual disabilities and institutions that offer comprehensive transition and postsecondary programs are subject to the same regulations and procedures that otherwise apply to Title IV, HEA program participants.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1091)
Black Hills National Forest
Mountain Pine Beetle Response Project

Draft Environmental
juss} Impact Statement i

Alternative B “

Legend
Alternative B

@6 Proposed Treatment Areas
242,000 acres

~~~ Main Roads
Non-National Forest System Lands
«| Forest Boundary
§ 396.30 How does the Secretary evaluate an application? ( a ) The Secretary evaluates applications under the procedures in 34 CFR part 75.
( b ) The Secretary evaluates each application using selection criteria in § 396.31.
( c ) In addition to the selection criteria described in paragraph (b) of this section, the Secretary evaluates each application using— ( 1 ) Selection criteria in 34 CFR 75.210;
( 2 ) Selection criteria established under 34 CFR 75.209; or
( 3 ) A combination of selection criteria established under 34 CFR 75.209 and selection criteria in 34 CFR 75.210.
(Authority: Section 302(f) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 772(f))
### §956. Conspiracy to kill, kidnap, maim, or injure persons or damage property in a foreign country

(a)(1) Whoever, within the jurisdiction of the United States, conspires with one or more other persons, regardless of where such other person or persons are located, to commit at any place outside the United States an act that would constitute the offense of murder, kidnapping, or maiming if committed in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States shall, if any of the conspirators commits an act within the jurisdiction of the United States to effect any object of the conspiracy, be punished as provided in subsection (a)(2).

(2) The punishment for an offense under subsection (a)(1) of this section is—

(A) imprisonment for any term of years or for life if the offense is conspiracy to murder or kidnap; and

(B) imprisonment for not more than 35 years if the offense is conspiracy to maim.

(b) Whoever, within the jurisdiction of the United States, conspires with one or more persons, regardless of where such other person or persons are located, to damage or destroy specific property situated within a foreign country and belonging to a foreign government or to any political subdivision thereof with which the United States is at peace, or any railroad, canal, bridge, airport, airfield, or other public utility, public conveyance, or public structure, or any religious, educational, or cultural property so situated, shall, if any of the conspirators commits an act within the jurisdiction of the United States to effect any object of the conspiracy, be imprisoned not more than 25 years.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 744; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 104–132, title VII, §704(a), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1294.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on section 234 of title 22, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Foreign Relations and Intercourse (June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title VIII, §5, 40 Stat. 226).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–132 substituted "Conspiracy to kill, kidnap, maim, or injure persons or damage property in a foreign country" for "Conspiracy to injure property of foreign government" as section catchline and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows:

"(a) If two or more persons within the jurisdiction of the United States conspire to injure or destroy specific property situated within a foreign country and belonging to a foreign government or to any political subdivision thereof with which the United States is at peace, or any railroad, canal, bridge, or other public utility so situated, and if one or more such persons commits an act within the jurisdiction of the United States to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to the conspiracy shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

"(b) Any indictment or information under this section shall describe the specific property which it was the object of the conspiracy to injure or destroy."

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000".
# CA2009048EN.01S00301.xml

| 27.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 48/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 48/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided to no longer quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

October 1, 2002

DAILY CVP WATER SUPPLY REPORT

SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 RUN DATE:

RESERVOIR RELEASES IN CUBIC FEET/SECOND

TRINITY

SACRAMENTO

FEATHER

AMERICAN

STANISLAUS

SAN JOAQUIN

LEWISTON

KESWICK

OROVILLE (SWP)

NIMBUS

GOODWIN

FRIANT

RESERVOIR MEDIAN 2001 2002 15

 450

 7,610

 1,200

 1,486

 219

 201

 450

 7,027

 2,750

 1,503

 132

 210

RESERVOIR CAPACITY YR AVG

TRINITY

SHASTA

OROVILLE (SWP)

FOLSOM

NEW MELONES

FED. SAN LUIS

2001 2002

 1,428

 2,200

 1,488

 368

 1,481

 314

 1,500

 2,558

 1,400

 510

 1,278

 295

 15

STORAGE IN MAJOR RESERVOIRS IN THOUSANDS OF ACRE-FEET

MILLERTON 

TOT. N. CVP 

 188 221

 5,791 6,141

2,448

4,552

3,538

977

2,420

966

520

11,360

% OF 15YR AVG 

RESERVOIR

CURRENT

YR AVG

TRINITY

SHASTA

FOLSOM

NEW MELONES

1983

 2,888

 10,794

 6,541

 2,747

 1,246

 5,051

 1,865

 711

 15

MILLERTON 1,165 4,705

DRIEST % OF

ACCUMULATED INFLOW FOR WATER YEAR TO DATE IN THOUSANDS OF ACRE-FEET

WY WY 

WETTEST

WY 

YR

AVG

 15

2002 1977

DAM YR

RESERVOIR

CURRENT

TRINITY AT

FISH HATCHERY

SACRAMENTO AT

SHASTA DAM 

AMERICAN AT 

BLUE CANYON

STANISLAUS AT

NEW MELONES

1983

 58.58

 116.63

 105.60

 46.79

 0.00

 0.00

 0.00

 0.00

SAN JOAQUIN AT

HUNTINGTON LK 

 85.00 0.00

DRIEST 

ACCUMULATED PRECIPITATION FOR WATER YEAR TO DATE IN INCHES

WY WY 

WETTEST

WY 

% OF

2002 1977 AVG

AVG

(N YRS)

 225

 2,628

 356

 0

 377

 16.35

 26.44

 18.28

 0.00

 17.60

 31.70

 59.57

 59.90

 24.37

 37.91

 450

 6,537

 2,500

 1,503

 223

 196

 1,502 100

 2,439

 1,983

 476

 1,169

 272

 216

 5,858

 105

 71

 107

 109

 109

 102

 105

 32.82

 1,298

 5,754

 2,603

 1,019

 1,686

 96

 88

 72

 70

 69

 97

 63.43

 65.66

 26.67

 44.13

 94

 91

 91

 86

 40

 45

 27

 24

 27

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

 LAST 

24 HRS
#### Frank Castello et al., Respondents, v. Gold Medal Farms, Inc., Appellant. Brooklyn Edison Company, Inc., Respondent, v. Gold Medal Farms, Inc., *745Appellant, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
p.1 

OAR Box 1878 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

127) ll-E-11 

Docket Number: 

A-90-19 

Printed 11/28/2008 1:21:26 PM Sheet 127 of 145 
A-90-19 

ll-E-11 

P.2 

RADIA N 

CORPORATI O 

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD 

0 Incoming Call 

W Outgoing Call 

Person Calling 

Roy V, Oommen 

Person Called 

Bil l Davis (504) 765-0219 

N 

Project No. 

239-017-53-09 

Project Name 

HON - HC1 

Date 

5/17/91 

Time 

11:00 am 

Activity 

Associate Engineer 

Activity 

Louisiana Air Control Board -

Permits Coordinator 

General Subject \ 

Flare s used for controllin g halogenated pollutants 

Distributio n 

Project Fil e 

^W 

TOPICS DISCUSSED AJID ACTIOS TAKER 

The following conversation took place with Mr. Davis: 

Are flares prohibited from being used to control halogenated 

pollutants? 

Mr. Davis stated that flares are not prohibited in any Louisiana 

air regulations. 

Are there any limits for halogenated pollutants entering flares? 

Mr. Davis did not know of any limits for halogens entering 

flares. 

How is flare applicability determined? 

Mr. Davis stated flare applicability is determined on a 

case-by-case basis, based on ambient impacts, etc. 

Are there any chemical facilities that use flares to control 

halogenated pollutant emissions? 

Mr. Davis did not know of any facilities that use flares for 

controlling halogenated pollutants. Generally, flares are 

discouraged from being used. 

Signature Z

5 YdL
1

Christopher L. Perkins (VA Bar No. 41783)

ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC

919 E. Main Street, Suite 1300

Richmond, Virginia 23219

Telephone: (804) 788-9636

Facsimile: (804) 698-2950

E-Mail: cperkins@eckertseamans.com

Counsel to Certain Former LeClairRyan, PLLC Attorneys

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Richmond Division

In re: Case No.

LeClairRyan PLLC, 19-34574-KRH

Debtor. Chapter 7

JOINDER OF CERTAIN FORMER LECLAIRRYAN, PLLC

ATTORNEYS TO MOTION TO AMEND DEBTOR’S EQUITY

SECURITY HOLDERS LIST PURSUANT TO BANKRUPTCY RULE 1009(A)

Those Certain Former LeClairRyan, PLLC Attorneys1

, by counsel, join in and adopt, as if 

restated in full herein, the Motion To Amend Debtor’s Equity Security Holders List Pursuant To 

Bankruptcy Rule 1009(a) (“Motion”) (Docket No 1217). 

Like the Movant, each of the Former LeClair Attorneys terminated their employment and 

resigned their membership on or before September 3, 2019 - the date of the bankruptcy petition -

yet are incorrectly included on the ESH List (as defined in the Motion). For the reasons asserted 

in the Motion and the Declarations attached hereto in support of their Joinder, the Former 

1 The former attorneys include the following: Megan Ben’Ary, Steven Blaine, James Carroll, Brian Donnell, Robert 

Fletcher, Robert Harrison, Charles Horn, Ray King, David Lay, Ilan Markus, David Phillips, Christopher Perkins,

Christopher Pizzo, Thomas Regan, Peter Van Zandt, Robert Wayne, Andrew White, Diane Wilson, Robert 

Wonneberger, and Karen Yates (“Former Attorneys”).

Case 19-34574-KRH Doc 1234 Filed 03/04/22 Entered 03/04/22 13:24:28 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

Attorneys should be removed from the Equity List. As such, the Former Attorneys incorporate 

and join in each of the arguments and legal citations set forth in the Motion, as applicable to them.

The Former Attorneys reserve their rights to supplement this Joinder and to present 

additional evidence, and make such other and further arguments as they deem necessary or 

appropriate in support of the Motion. 

WHEREFORE, the Former LeClair, PLLC Attorneys join the Motion, and respectfully 

request that this Court grant the Motion as applicable to them, enter an Order requiring the removal 

of the Certain Former LeClairRyan, PLLC Attorneys from the Equity List, and grant such other 

and further relief as may be just and proper.

Dated: March 4, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

CERTAIN FORMER LECLAIRRYAN PLLC

ATTORNEYS

/s/Christopher L. Perkins

Christopher L. Perkins (VA Bar No. 41783)

ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC

919 E. Main Street, Suite 1300

Richmond, Virginia 23219

Telephone: (804) 788-9636

Facsimile: (804) 698-2950

E-Mail: cperkins@eckertseamans.com

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 4, 2022, a true and correct copy of the foregoing document 

was filed with the Court and sent through the CM/ECF system to all parties designated to receive 

such documents.

 /s/ Christopher L. Perkins

Case 19-34574-KRH Doc 1234 Filed 03/04/22 Entered 03/04/22 13:24:28 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
### Adams, Kevin (OST)

From: 

### Sen t : To: 

### Subject: Attachments: ' . f r ..- ; ~ ~ ' " Afo g na k W i lde rne ss L odg e < Af og n a kWil d e r n e s sL o d g e @y ahoo , c o r r i ; ; ; : ( } : :h ' , T h u rsda y , Augu s t 15 , 201 3 2:48 A M r - ) : ' ~( ~, EAS ( OST ) Kodia k Water s top s/Se a l Ba y EAS water st o psSeal B a y . Kodiak . j p q Department of Transportation . / D o c ket DOT- O ST-2000-6 9 45 To Whom It M ay Co n cern : At tached, please find the names/signatures of full t i me res i dents cu rr entl y at Sea l Ba y , Alas k a , This h a s bee n a ye ar-rou n d hab i t a t ion s in ce 19 6 4 p l us a reputable year-round w i lderness l od g e s i nce 1974 , Island Air has provi d ed excellent pr o fessional on-time serv i ce and the i r s taff con sis t e n tly goes a b ove & b ey ond the i r d u t y to meet whatever n eeds f o r an y g i ven situa t io n, They are a n integral part of our isla n d commu n it y , Throughou t t h e pas t 5 decades , no-one has compared t o the high qual i ty of serv i ce that Is l and A i r has provided and we highl y rec o mme nd t ha t y o u renew the i r Essen t i al A i r Se rv i ce co n tract, Kind regardS, Sha n non Randall , Afognak Wilderness Lodge, 

### r . o . B o x SYB , Sea l Ba y , K o diak , Alaska 99697 360-799-3250

### Dep artment of Tr ans portatio n

E - ' ' ' " 'd l\ Sfp; l ot . g ov 

### Proposal to p ro vi d e Essenti al Air Servi c e Kodi ak W ater s tops D oc ke t DOT
- O S T
- 2 00 0
- 6 94 5 \V e th e und er s igned Sup p o rt th e f il i n g of Re d e mpti on I nc (Is l and Air Serv i c e ) i n the ir reque s t fo r Subs i dy un d er th e E sse nti al Serv ic e f i l i n g f o r th e Kodi ak Water Stop s C ontr act . V' l e l i v e an d wo rk on these ro u te s a s li sted an d w o ul d l ike to re t ai n th e servi c es of I sl and Air as o ur carrier . NAJ vlE 

### DESTINArIONi R esi dent Addre s s

. _ -

_ .

# __ . _ - -- - - - - - _. _ - - ---
_ . ... 

### - -
_ . _-_ .- . . .

## _- - - - --_. _- - - - ,. _-
_ . . - - ''' - - ' - - - ' ' ' -

_ .. -
_ . . _ . - - -- -_ . _ '

_ . __ .



## 1420 Airport fV

l~ r 

## PO Box 125 

## (90 7) 487
- 4S96 faxr / 

## 907)487
- 4693 Kodiak , AX 9961 S 

## i . s iandair(q)ll laska. com
6 Campus Drive  1 st Floor N.  Parsippany  NJ 07054  (973) 267-9700  FAX (973) 267-9055

www. Pumps.org  www. PumpLearning.org  www. PumpSystemsMatter.org December 13, 2012

The Honorable Steven Chu

Secretary, U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Ave. SW

Washington DC 20585

Via: ElecMotors

‐ 2010

‐ STD

‐ 0027@ee.doe.gov

, the.secretary@hq.doe.gov

Subject: Endorsement of the Joint Petition to Adopt Joint Stakeholder Proposal As it

Relates to the Rulemaking on Energy Conservation Standards for Electric Motors,

Docket No. EERE–2010–BT– STD–0027

Dear Secretary Chu:

The Hydraulic Institute remains committed to and deeply interested in energy efficiency as a

means of addressing our nation’s energy usage and its continued availability. Recently, you

received the subject petition. We wish to lend our support to this petition’s contents and goals.

The strength of this petition lies in the early, continued collaboration of the many stakeholders

who developed it, its straightforwardness and its feasibility. We applaud the combined efforts

of manufacturers and energy

‐ efficiency advocates to advance policy and regulation in a

responsible and meaningful way. We encourage the DOE to adopt the principles and content of

the petition, so as to begin saving the most energy as soon as feasibly possible.

The Hydraulic Institute endorses the petition and we encourage you to give it your complete

attention and take immediate action to empower these excellent solutions as soon as possible.

Sincerely,

Robert K. Asdal

Executive Director

Hydraulic Institute
### §3504. Litigation concerning sources of evidence

(a) In any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory body, or other authority of the United States—

(1) upon a claim by a party aggrieved that evidence is inadmissible because it is the primary product of an unlawful act or because it was obtained by the exploitation of an unlawful act, the opponent of the claim shall affirm or deny the occurrence of the alleged unlawful act;

(2) disclosure of information for a determination if evidence is inadmissible because it is the primary product of an unlawful act occurring prior to June 19, 1968, or because it was obtained by the exploitation of an unlawful act occurring prior to June 19, 1968, shall not be required unless such information may be relevant to a pending claim of such inadmissibility; and

(3) no claim shall be considered that evidence of an event is inadmissible on the ground that such evidence was obtained by the exploitation of an unlawful act occurring prior to June 19, 1968, if such event occurred more than five years after such allegedly unlawful act.

(b) As used in this section "unlawful act" means any act the use of any electronic, mechanical, or other device (as defined in section 2510(5) of this title) in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States or any regulation or standard promulgated pursuant thereto.

(Added Pub. L. 91–452, title VII, §702(a), Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 935.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Congressional Statement of Findings

Pub. L. 91–452, title VII, §701, Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 935, provided that: "The Congress finds that claims that evidence offered in proceedings was obtained by the exploitation of unlawful acts, and is therefore inadmissible in evidence, (1) often cannot reliably be determined when such claims concern evidence of events occurring years after the allegedly unlawful act, and (2) when the allegedly unlawful act has occurred more than five years prior to the event in question, there is virtually no likelihood that the evidence offered to prove the event has been obtained by the exploitation of that allegedly unlawful act."

#### Applicability to Proceedings

Pub. L. 91–452, title VII, §703, Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 936, provided that: "This title [enacting this section and provisions set as notes under this section] shall apply to all proceedings, regardless of when commenced, occurring after the date of its enactment [Oct. 15, 1970]. Paragraph (3) of subsection (a) of section 3504, chapter 223, title 18, United States Code, shall not apply to any proceeding in which all information to be relied upon to establish inadmissibility was possessed by the party making such claim and adduced in such proceeding prior to such enactment."