alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of VitalStream Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-k for the year ended December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin D. Herzog, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|/s/ Kevin D. HerzogKevin D. Herzog
Chief Financial Officer
March 28, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 

[A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]

---

QuickLinks
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 1170** 

In R e: SAMUEL TIJUAN JONES , Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (4:08

- cv - 03180

- HFF

- TER)

Submitted : June 1 , 2010 Decided: June 10 , 2010

Befor e GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

. Samuel Tijuan Jones, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Samuel Tijuan Jones petitions fo r a writ of mandamus, seeking an order directing the magistrate judge to rule on Jones’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) motion

. The magistrate judge issued his report and recommendation prior to Jones’ petition for writ of mandamus, and the district court has sub sequently denied Jones’ § 2241 petition . Accordingly , although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny Jones’ mandamus petition as moot . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

m aterials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### § 601.1 Scope.

This part establishes disclosure and reporting requirements for covered institutions, institution-affiliated organizations, and lenders that provide, issue, recommend, promote, endorse, or provide information relating to education loans. Education loans include loans authorized by the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA) and private education loans.

(Authority:20 U.S.C. 1019-1019d, 1021, 1094(a)(25) and (e)).
§ 637.13 What are design projects? ( a ) Design project grants assist minority institutions that do not have their own appropriate resources or personnel to plan and develop long-range science improvement programs.
( b ) Activities that the Secretary may assist under a design project include, but are not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Development of planning, management, and evaluation systems; and
( 2 ) Improvement of institutional research or development offices.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1067-1067c, 1067g-1067k, 1068, and 1068b)
[46 FR 51204, Oct. 16, 1981, as amended at 52 FR 43545, Nov. 12, 1987]
SCWC-11-0000714

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

RAMON MARIANO GONZALEZ, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-11-0000714; CR. NO. 09-1-308K)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Ramon Mariano 

Gonzalez’s application for writ of certiorari filed on May 31, 

2016, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, July 15, 2016.

Peter Van Name Esser /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

and Robert D.S. Kim 

for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Dale Yamada Ross /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

and Linda L. Walton

for respondent /s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-11-0000714

15-JUL-2016

10:00 AM
(No. 74-CC-562

#### Griggsville Community School Unit 4, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 8, 1974.*

Griggsville Community School Unit 4, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of PARA MAS INTERNET,
INC. (the "COMPANY"),  for  the  quarterly period ended March 31, 2004,  as
Filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the
"REPORT"),   I,   Gary  Whiting,  Principal  Executive  Officer  and  Principal
Financial Officer of the  Company,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby  certify,
to my knowledge that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m (a) or 780(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Gary Whiting
--------------------------------------------
Gary Whiting
Principal  Executive  Officer
Principal  Financial  Officer

Dated:     September 17,  2004

A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  PARA MAS INTERNET, INC. and will be retained by PARA MAS INTERNET,
INC. and furnished  to  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
II 

Calendar No. 450 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4981 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2020 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

MARCH 12, 2020 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2505 Derita Avenue in Charlotte, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Julius L. Chambers Civil Rights Memorial 

Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JULIUS L. CHAMBERS CIVIL RIGHTS MEMORIAL 

4 POST OFFICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 2505 Derita Avenue in Charlotte, 

7 North Carolina, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Julius L. Chambers Civil Rights Memorial Post Office’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4981 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Julius L. Chambers 

5 Civil Rights Memorial Post Office’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 450 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4981 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostChambers Civil Rights Memorial Post Office’’. Charlotte, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Julius L. al Service located at 2505 Derita Avenue in 

MARCH 12, 2020 

Reported without amendment 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Conversation with Wastewater Technologies, November, 2010.

To improve nutrient retention in septic systems, Biomicrobics manufactures RetroFAST, which 

is a retroactive addition to existing septic systems and drainfields. The system is a fixed-film 

activated sludge process. Costs are in the range of $1,650 plus an additional $400 to $500 for 

installation.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 14, 2020

p081 1 

# Order

Clerk August 14, 2020

161568 & (45)

In re G. K. KADOGUCHI, Minor. SC: 161568

COA: 351656

Wayne CC Family Division:

19

- 000910

- NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 28, 2020 judgment

of the Court of Appe als is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to add issues is

GRANTED.
#### § 677.2 [Reserved]
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5033 

To expand the eligibility of veterans for hospital care and medical services 

provided by non-Department of Veterans Affairs medical providers under 

the Veterans Choice Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 12, 2019 

Mr. BYRNE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To expand the eligibility of veterans for hospital care and 

medical services provided by non-Department of Veterans 

Affairs medical providers under the Veterans Choice Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Full Choice for Vet5 erans Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5033 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR NON-DEPART2 MENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CARE 

3 UNDER VETERANS COMMUNITY CARE PRO4 GRAM. 

5 Section 101 of the John S. McCain III, Daniel K. 

6 Akaka, and Samuel R. Johnson VA Maintaining Internal 

7 Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks 

8 Act of 2018 or the VA MISSION Act of 2018 (Public 

9 Law 115–182; 38 U.S.C. 1703) is amended— 

10 (1) by striking subsection (d) and inserting: 

11 ‘‘(d) CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH CARE IS RE12 QUIRED TO BE FURNISHED THROUGH NON-DEPART13 MENT PROVIDERS.—The Secretary shall, subject to the 

14 availability of appropriations, furnish hospital care, med15 ical services, or extended care services to a covered veteran 

16 through health care providers specified in subsection (c) 

17 if the covered veteran notifies the Secretary that he or 

18 she desires to receive care through the Veterans Commu19 nity Care Program.’’; and 

20 (2) by striking subsection (e). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 2,918

 2,294

 1,754

 1,146

 928

 826

 179

 404

 220

 446

 410

 243

 373

 670

 2,112

 1,269

 788

 1,609

 1,039

 714

 673

 700

 1,165

 3,284

 3,340

 2,935

 3,437

 4,521

 4,434

 4,658

 3,755

 185

 164

 145

 150

 143

 132

 126

 127

 125

 132

 134

 127

 129

 131

 132

 144

 131

 131

 140

 135

 133

 132

 134

 149

 256

 206

 177

 169

 227

 253

 258

 1,071

 755

 642

 470

 365

 284

 153

 173

 169

 197

 195

 182

 193

 236

 510

 421

 289

 433

 434

 348

 262

 296

 374

 920

 1,328

 1,226

 1,291

 1,499

 1,672

 1,779

 1,713

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 9, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §1342. Fictitious name or address

Whoever, for the purpose of conducting, promoting, or carrying on by means of the Postal Service, any scheme or device mentioned in section 1341 of this title or any other unlawful business, uses or assumes, or requests to be addressed by, any fictitious, false, or assumed title, name, or address or name other than his own proper name, or takes or receives from any post office or authorized depository of mail matter, any letter, postal card, package, or other mail matter addressed to any such fictitious, false, or assumed title, name, or address, or name other than his own proper name, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 763; Pub. L. 91–375, §6(j)(12), Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 778; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §339 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §216, 35 Stat. 1131).

The punishment language used in section 1341 of this title was substituted in lieu of the reference to it in this section.

Minor changes in phraseology were made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000".

1970—Pub. L. 91–375 substituted "Postal Service" for "Post Office Department of the United States".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 91–375 effective within 1 year after Aug. 12, 1970, on date established therefor by Board of Governors of United States Postal Service and published by it in Federal Register, see section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 39, Postal Service.
§ 668.60 Deadlines for submitting documentation and the consequences of failing to provide documentation. ( a ) An institution must require an applicant selected for verification to submit to it, within the period of time it or the Secretary specifies, the documentation set forth in § 668.57 that is requested by the institution.
( b ) For purposes of the subsidized student financial assistance programs, excluding the Federal Pell Grant Program— ( 1 ) If an applicant fails to provide the requested documentation within a reasonable time period established by the institution— ( i ) The institution may not— ( A ) Disburse any additional Federal Perkins Loan or FSEOG Program funds to the applicant;
( B ) Employ, continue to employ or allow an employer to employ the applicant under FWS; or
( C ) Originate the applicant's Direct Subsidized Loan or disburse any additional Direct Subsidized Loan proceeds for the applicant; and
( ii ) The applicant must repay to the institution any Federal Perkins Loan or FSEOG received for that award year;
( 2 ) If the applicant provides the requested documentation after the time period established by the institution, the institution may, at its option, disburse aid to the applicant notwithstanding paragraph (b)(1) of this section; and
( 3 ) If an institution has received proceeds for a Direct Subsidized Loan on behalf of an applicant, the institution must return all or a portion of those funds as provided under § 668.166(b) if the applicant does not complete verification within the time period specified.
( c ) For purposes of the Federal Pell Grant Program— ( 1 ) An applicant may submit a valid SAR to the institution or the institution may receive a valid ISIR after the applicable deadline specified in 34 CFR 690.61 but within an established additional time period set by the Secretary through publication of a notice in the Federal Register; and
( 2 ) If the applicant does not provide to the institution the requested documentation and, if necessary, a valid SAR or the institution does not receive a valid ISIR, within the additional time period referenced in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the applicant— ( i ) Forfeits the Federal Pell Grant for the award year; and
( ii ) Must return any Federal Pell Grant payments previously received for that award year.
( d ) The Secretary may determine not to process FAFSA information of an applicant who has been requested to provide documentation until the applicant provides the documentation or the Secretary decides that there is no longer a need for the documentation.
( e ) If an applicant selected for verification for an award year dies before the deadline for completing verification without completing that process, the institution may not— ( 1 ) Make any further disbursements on behalf of that applicant;
( 2 ) Originate that applicant's Direct Subsidized Loan, or disburse that applicant's Direct Subsidized Loan proceeds; or
( 3 ) Consider any funds it disbursed to that applicant under § 668.58(a)(2) as an overpayment.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1094)
Exhibit 11


                          ULTICOM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                 Statement re Computation of Per Share Earnings
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (In thousands, except per share data)


                                                           Three months ended
                                                          April 30,    April 30,
                                                             2000        2001

Basic earnings per share:

     Net income                                            $   961     $ 4,144
                                                           =======     =======

Weighted average number of outstanding common shares        34,100      40,565
                                                           =======     =======

Basic earnings per share                                   $   .03     $   .10
                                                           =======     =======


Diluted earnings per share:

     Net income                                            $   961     $ 4,144
                                                           =======     =======


Weighted average number of outstanding common shares        34,100      40,565
Additional shares assuming exercise of stock options         2,320       3,032
                                                           -------     -------

Weighted average number of outstanding common shares
     assuming full dilution                                 36,420      43,597
                                                           =======     =======

Diluted earnings per share                                 $   .03     $   .10
                                                           =======     =======





                              Page 16 of 16 Pages
§ 21.31 Contents of application. ( a ) In its application for an award of fees and other expenses, an applicant shall include the following: ( 1 ) Information adequate to show that the applicant is a prevailing party in an adversary adjudication or in a significant and discrete substantive portion of an adversary adjudication.
( 2 ) A statement that the adversary adjudication is covered by the Act according to § 21.10.
( 3 ) An allegation that the position of the Department was not substantially justified, including a description of the specific position.
( 4 ) Unless the applicant is a qualified tax-exempt organization or a qualified agricultural cooperative association, information adequate to show that the applicant qualifies under the requirements of §§ 21.20 and 21.21 regarding net worth. The information, if applicable, shall include a detailed exhibit of the net worth of the applicant—and its affiliates as described in § 21.21—as of the date the proceeding was initiated.
( 5 ) ( i ) The total amount of fees and expenses sought in the award; and
( ii ) An itemized statement of— ( A ) Each expense; and
( B ) Each fee, including the actual time expended for this fee and the rate at which the fee was computed.
( 6 ) A written verification under oath or affirmation or under penalty of perjury from each attorney representing the applicant stating— ( i ) The rate at which the fee submitted by the attorney was computed; and
( ii ) The actual time expended for the fee.
( 7 ) A written verification under oath, affirmation, or under penalty of perjury that the information contained in the application and any accompanying material is true and complete to the best of the applicant's information and belief.
( b ) The adjudicative officer may require the applicant to submit additional information.
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 504 (a)(2) and (c)(1))
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4992 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to carry out a pilot program on suicide 

prevention in the military health care system. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 8, 2019 

Ms. GABBARD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to carry out a pilot 

program on suicide prevention in the military health 

care system. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Recovery Engagement 

5 And Coordination for Health–Military Innovations for 

6 Life Act’’ or the ‘‘REACH MIL Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. PILOT PROGRAM ON SUICIDE PREVENTION IN MILI8 TARY HEALTH CARE SYSTEM. 

9 (a) PILOT PROGRAM.—The Secretary of Defense, in 

10 collaboration with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4992 IH

1 carry out a pilot program on suicide prevention in the mili2 tary health care system. Such program shall be similar 

3 to the REACH VET predictive analysis pilot program car4 ried out by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

5 (b) PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS PROCESS.— 

6 (1) PRE-EMPTIVE CARE.—In carrying out the 

7 pilot program, the Secretary of Defense shall ana8 lyze existing data from health records of members of 

9 the Armed Force serving on active duty to identify 

10 the members who are at a statistically elevated risk 

11 for suicide, hospitalization, illness, or other adverse 

12 outcomes, in order to provide pre-emptive care and 

13 support for such members before such members have 

14 or express suicidal thoughts to clinicians. 

15 (2) PROCESS.—The Secretary shall ensure that 

16 the predictive analytics process developed pursuant 

17 to paragraph (1)— 

18 (A) identifies members of the Armed 

19 Forces serving on active duty who are at high 

20 statistical risk for suicide; 

21 (B) flags the records of the members; and 

22 (C) requires health care providers of the 

23 military health care system to contact such 

24 members to initiate a care plan. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4992 IH

1 (c) INFORMATION SHARING.—The Secretary of De2 fense shall provide information under the pilot program 

3 under subsection (a) with the Secretary of Veterans Af4 fairs to ensure that a member of the Armed Forces serving 

5 on active duty who transitions from the military health 

6 care system to the health care system of the Department 

7 of Veterans Affairs is able to schedule appropriate follow8 up mental health care appointments with the Department 

9 of Veterans Affairs. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS