alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 668.75 Omission of fact. An omission of fact is a misrepresentation under § 668.71 if a reasonable person would have considered the omitted information in making a decision to enroll or continue attendance at the institution. An omission of fact includes, but is not limited to, the concealment, suppression, or absence of material information or statement concerning— ( a ) The entity that is actually providing the educational instruction, or implementing the institution's recruitment, admissions, or enrollment process;
( b ) The availability of enrollment openings in the student's desired program;
( c ) The factors that would prevent an applicant from meeting the legal or other requirements to be employed in the field for which the training is provided, for reasons such as prior criminal record or preexisting medical conditions;
( d ) The factors that would prevent an applicant from meeting the legal or other requirements to be employed, licensed, or certified in the field for which the training is provided because the academic, professional, or occupational degree or credential that the institution will confer upon completion of the course of study has not been authorized by the appropriate State educational or licensure agency, or requires specialized accreditation that the institution does not have; or,
( e ) The nature of the institution's educational programs, the institution's financial charges, or the employability of the institution's graduates as defined in § 668.72-74.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean TDS

1 300 102 236 162

2 245 116 154 111

3 536 110 259 176

4 578 146 395 260

5 741 144 504 327

6 777 706 752 481

7 777 701 749 479

8 698 649 664 426

9 690 662 682 437

10 730 688 712 456

11 726 635 670 430

12 636 611 624 402

13 632 544 598 386

14 601 518 556 360

15 582 430 480 313

16 468 438 453 296

17 480 450 467 305

18 446 427 437 286

19 515 414 445 291

20 517 418 452 295

21 573 402 478 311

22 593 413 493 321

23 550 416 478 311

24 573 422 483 314

25 488 397 440 288

26 644 424 560 362

27 579 540 555 359

28 581 546 558 361

Total 14334

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Check 21 

Period: February 2023 Run Date: 11/27/2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2001
<CASH>                                          67,460
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,027
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,563
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   398
<PP&E>                                           6,110
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  79,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,407
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,885
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    79,456
<SALES>                                         19,417
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,417
<CGS>                                            6,443
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,443
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,921
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  54
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,316
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,639
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,677
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,677
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07






</TABLE>
#### Kathryne Browne Decker, Respondent, v. Henry Edwin Decker, Appellant.

Order modified as stated in order and as modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
#### George M. Estabrook, Appellant, v. Frederick P. Morris and Others, Respondents.

Order of the County Court of Nassau county affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Burr, Thomas, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 805

 819

 820

 818

 804

 928

 1,241

 831

 845

 811

 881

 815

 787

 813

 835

 815

 839

 857

 844

 836

 842

 801

 784

 815

 815

 820

 830

 821

 867

 888

 790

 793

 781

 796

 790

 803

 739

 759

 747

 778

 709

 712

 679

 719

 724

 725

 691

 691

 693

 658

 672

 577

 588

 614

 645

 721

 757

 682

 817

 803

 795

 804

 812

 813

 800

 821

 886

 798

 795

 790

 805

 763

 741

 773

 779

 775

 776

 795

 787

 761

 784

 733

 702

 741

 767

 764

 794

 739

 848

 851

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 11, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 507

 513

 518

 518

 510

 523

 564

 509

 507

 504

 513

 488

 474

 494

 497

 495

 496

 507

 502

 486

 501

 469

 450

 474

 490

 488

 507

 473

 540

 542

TOTAL 23,592

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of The Hertz Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Craig R. Koch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|Date: April 28, 2006 |  |     |                                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- | -----------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | By: | /s/CRAIG R. KOCHCraig R. Koch
Chief Executive Officer

---



QuickLinks
#### § 682.424 Severability.

If any provision of this subpart or its application to any person, act, or practice is held invalid, the remainder of the subpart or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or practice will not be affected thereby.

[87 FR 66055, Nov. 1, 2022]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1546

SAMUEL LEROY SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

AIKEN COUNTY GOVERNMENT; CLAY KILLIAN, County Administrator; 

COUNTY COUNCIL; NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. 

Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:18-cv-00779-HMH)

Submitted: September 18, 2018 Decided: September 20, 2018

Before WILKINSON and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Leroy Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Leroy Smith filed a personal injury action and the district court referred 

the matter to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The 

magistrate judge recommended dismissing the action for lack of subject matter 

jurisdiction and advised Smith that failure to file timely, specific objections to the 

recommendation could result in waiver of appellate review of a district court order based 

on the recommendation. Despite this warning, Smith failed to file specific objections. 

The district court adopted the recommendation and dismissed Smith’s complaint for lack 

of jurisdiction. Smith appeals. 

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is 

necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the 

parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766 

F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Smith 

has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. 

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §5039. Commitment

No juvenile committed, whether pursuant to an adjudication of delinquency or conviction for an offense, to the custody of the Attorney General may be placed or retained in an adult jail or correctional institution in which he has regular contact with adults incarcerated because they have been convicted of a crime or are awaiting trial on criminal charges.

Every juvenile who has been committed shall be provided with adequate food, heat, light, sanitary facilities, bedding, clothing, recreation, counseling, education, training, and medical care including necessary psychiatric, psychological, or other care and treatment.

Whenever possible, the Attorney General shall commit a juvenile to a foster home or community-based facility located in or near his home community.

(Added Pub. L. 93–415, title V, §509, Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1138; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title XIV, §140003, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2032.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 inserted ", whether pursuant to an adjudication of delinquency or conviction for an offense," after "committed" in first par.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeals

Pub. L. 93–415, title V, §509, Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1138, cited as a credit to this section, was repealed by Pub. L. 115–385, title III, §307, Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5152.
§ 676.1 Purpose and identification of common provisions. ( a ) The Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant (FSEOG) Program awards grants to financially needy students attending institutions of higher education to help them pay their educational costs.
*(b) Provisions in these regulations that are common to all campus-based programs are identified with an asterisk. (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070b)
[52 FR 45778, Dec. 1, 1987, as amended at 59 FR 61420, Nov. 30, 1994]
Exhibit
32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report of Feihe International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A (the “Company”)
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and President, and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                      

| | 2. | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations
of Feihe International, Inc.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                     |  |     |                                                    
|-------------------- |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2013 |  | By: | /s/
    Leng You-Bin                               
|                     |  |     | Leng You-Bin, Chief Executive Officer and President
|                     |  |     | (Principal Executive Officer)                      
|                     |  |     |                                                    
|Date: April 30, 2013 |  | By: | /s/
    Liu Hua                                    
|                     |  |     | Liu Hua, Chief Financial Officer                   
|                     |  |     | (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
#### § 385.44 What requirement applies to the training of individuals with disabilities?

Any grantee or contractor who provides training shall give due regard to the training of individuals with disabilities as part of its effort to increase the number of qualified personnel available to provide rehabilitation services.

(Authority: Section 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c)
### §3734. Bill of exceptions abolished—(Rule)

#### See Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

Exceptions abolished, Rule 51.

Bill of exceptions not required, Rule 37(a)(1).

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 845.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure was abrogated Dec. 4, 1967, eff. July 1, 1968, and is covered by Rule 3, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, set out in the Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q of DAC
Technologies Group International, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended
June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Collins, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify that:

         o        the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         o        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                  material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                   /s/ David A. Collins
                  --------------------------
                  Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 13, 2002
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 471

 457

 525

 474

 476

 449

 475

 455

 380

 350

 370

 409

 393

 387

 403

 386

 372

 374

 372

 376

 438

 382

 392

 490

 490

 515

 564

 572

 566

 557

 597

 275

 241

 234

 248

 278

 275

 271

 232

 210

 210

 231

 232

 226

 236

 252

 260

 268

 258

 286

 322

 289

 291

 320

 321

 340

 345

 344

 343

 321

 304

 295

 334

 324

 316

 322

 330

 336

 341

 316

 273

 264

 284

 288

 290

 279

 287

 290

 300

 304

 320

 343

 347

 325

 353

 377

 399

 413

 428

 443

 419

 422

 438

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:April 11, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 222

 216

 211

 215

 220

 224

 227

 211

 185

 179

 192

 194

 195

 188

 193

 195

 201

 204

 214

 228

 230

 217

 234

 249

 263

 271

 281

 290

 275

 277

 287

TOTAL 10,505

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Beacon Power Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
M. Spiezio, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ James M. Spiezio
James M. Spiezio
Chief Financial Officer

August 16, 2004
§ 658.32 What additional criteria does the Secretary apply to institutional applications? In addition to the criteria referred to in § 658.31, the Secretary evaluates an application submitted by an institution of higher education or a consortium of such institutions on the basis of the criteria in this section. ( a ) *Commitment to international studies.* ( 1 ) The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows the applicant's commitment to the international studies program.
( 2 ) The Secretary looks for information that shows— ( i ) The institution's current strength as measured by the number of international studies courses offered;
( ii ) The extent to which planning for the implementation of the proposed program has involved the applicant's faculty, as well as administrators;
( iii ) The institutional commitment to the establishment, operation, and continuation of the program as demonstrated by optimal use of available personnel and other resources; and
( iv ) The institutional commitment to the program as demonstrated by the use of institutional funds in support of the program's objectives.
( b ) *Elements of the proposed international studies program.* ( 1 ) The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows the nature of the applicant's proposed international studies program.
( 2 ) The Secretary looks for information that shows— ( i ) The extent to which the proposed activities will contribute to the implementation of a program in international studies and foreign languages at the applicant institution;
( ii ) The interdisciplinary aspects of the program;
( iii ) The number of new and revised courses with an international perspective that will be added to the institution's programs; and
( iv ) The applicant's plans to improve or expand language instruction.
( c ) *Need for and prospective results of the proposed program.* ( 1 ) The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows the need for and the prospective results of the applicant's proposed program.
( 2 ) The Secretary looks for information that shows— ( i ) The extent to which the proposed activities are needed at the applicant institution;
( ii ) The extent to which the proposed use of Federal funds will result in the implementation of a program in international studies and foreign languages at the applicant institution;
( iii ) The likelihood that the activities initiated with Federal funds will be continued after Federal assistance is terminated; and
( iv ) The adequacy of the provisions for sharing the materials and results of the program with other institutions of higher education.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1124)
[47 FR 14122, Apr. 1, 1982, as amended at 52 FR 28422, July 29, 1987; 70 FR 13375, Mar. 21, 2005; 74 FR 35074, July 17, 2009]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 553

 545

 539

 523

 526

 522

 519

 512

 543

 594

 629

 653

 652

 676

 674

 655

 684

 720

 696

 706

 721

 701

 656

 616

 652

 740

 746

 706

 789

 677

 541

 474

 466

 471

 466

 456

 468

 485

 477

 483

 475

 480

 478

 477

 467

 468

 472

 461

 448

 460

 464

 439

 464

 464

 470

 475

 478

 480

 487

 565

 433

 366

 518

 514

 509

 501

 501

 501

 502

 499

 501

 503

 508

 509

 506

 516

 512

 511

 517

 521

 526

 520

 522

 524

 521

 505

 532

 592

 594

 569

 672

 534

 420

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:February 20, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 336

 334

 331

 326

 326

 326

 326

 324

 326

 327

 330

 331

 329

 335

 332

 332

 336

 338

 341

 337

 339

 340

 338

 328

 345

 382

 383

 368

 431

 346

 276

TOTAL 16,180

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
### §912. Relation to other laws

(a) Nothing in this chapter shall affect any right or remedy held by any person under chapters 1 through 8 or 10 of this title, or under title 35.

(b) Except as provided in section 908(b) of this title, references to "this title" or "title 17" in chapters 1 through 8 or 10 of this title shall be deemed not to apply to this chapter.

(c) The provisions of this chapter shall preempt the laws of any State to the extent those laws provide any rights or remedies with respect to a mask work which are equivalent to those rights or remedies provided by this chapter, except that such preemption shall be effective only with respect to actions filed on or after January 1, 1986.

(d) Notwithstanding subsection (c), nothing in this chapter shall detract from any rights of a mask work owner, whether under Federal law (exclusive of this chapter) or under the common law or the statutes of a State, heretofore or hereafter declared or enacted, with respect to any mask work first commercially exploited before July 1, 1983.

(Added Pub. L. 98–620, title III, §302, Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3354; amended Pub. L. 100–702, title X, §1020(b), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4672; Pub. L. 102–563, §3(c), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4248.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 102–563 inserted "or 10" after "8".

1988—Subsecs. (d), (e). Pub. L. 100–702 redesignated subsec. (e) as (d) and struck out former subsec. (d) which read as follows: "The provisions of sections 1338, 1400(a), and 1498(b) and (c) of title 28 shall apply with respect to exclusive rights in mask works under this chapter."
(No. 78-CC-0670

#### Clyde E. Jackson, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed May 4, 1978.*

Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of *287his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas v. State, 32*Ill.Ct.Cl.__, this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to staté a claim upon which relief can be granted.

It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.