alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 295

 266

 291

 382

 577

 926

 888

 756

 728

 731

 835

 1,231

 1,936

 2,165

 1,765

 1,241

 1,138

 1,175

 789

 475

 443

 415

 478

 376

 352

 381

 373

 356

 394

 390

 412

 224

 205

 207

 209

 224

 232

 236

 236

 233

 227

 227

 230

 232

 262

 269

 260

 242

 240

 238

 228

 221

 213

 212

 209

 203

 207

 206

 202

 203

 205

 211

 242

 224

 227

 250

 296

 350

 348

 320

 306

 297

 356

 418

 590

 570

 516

 405

 401

 388

 320

 278

 270

 254

 276

 255

 245

 239

 243

 233

 239

 249

 259

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 1, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 3,776

 3,728

 3,673

 3,631

 3,635

 3,692

 3,724

 3,766

 3,812

 3,857

 3,964

 4,135

 4,479

 4,794

 5,068

 5,249

 5,423

 5,561

 5,585

 5,513

 5,435

 5,369

 5,339

 5,297

 5,186

 5,007

 4,660

 4,323

 4,046

 3,890

 3,748

 270

 266

 262

 259

 260

 264

 266

 269

 272

 276

 283

 295

 320

 342

 362

 375

 387

 397

 399

 394

 388

 384

 381

 378

 370

 358

 333

 309

 289

 278

 268

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
̄ 0 5 10 20

Miles

Potential Treatment Areas

Existing Road/Route

Main Roads

Non-National Forest System Lands

Forest Boundary

Legend

April, 2012

Sundance

Custer

Rapid

City

Deadwood

Lead

Sturgis

Hot

Springs

Edgemont

Wind Cave

National Park

Newcastle

Hill

City

Sand Creek

Beaver

Park

Cook

Lake

Rochford

Custer

State Park

Wilderness

Spearfish

§ ̈¦I-90

£¤16

Mountain Pine Beetle Response Project

Alternative B

Transportation Map

Black Hills National Forest

§ ̈¦I-90

§ ̈¦I-90

3385

3385

3385

316

316

316
§ 106.57 Parental, family, or marital status; pregnancy or related conditions. ( a ) *Status generally.* A recipient must not adopt or implement any policy, practice, or procedure, or take any employment action, on the basis of sex: ( 1 ) Concerning the current, potential, or past parental, family, or marital status of an employee or applicant for employment, which treats persons differently; or
( 2 ) That is based upon whether an employee or applicant for employment is the head of household or principal wage earner in such employee's or applicant's family unit.
( b ) *Pregnancy or related conditions.* A recipient must not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of current, potential, or past pregnancy or related conditions.
( c ) *Comparable treatment to other temporary medical conditions.* A recipient must treat pregnancy or related conditions as any other temporary medical conditions for all job-related purposes, including commencement, duration and extensions of leave; payment of disability income; accrual of seniority and any other benefit or service; and reinstatement; and under any fringe benefit offered to employees by virtue of employment.
( d ) *Voluntary leaves of absence.* In the case of a recipient that does not maintain a leave policy for its employees, or in the case of an employee with insufficient leave or accrued employment time to qualify for leave under such a policy, a recipient must treat pregnancy or related conditions as a justification for a voluntary leave of absence without pay for a reasonable period of time, at the conclusion of which the employee shall be reinstated to the status held when the leave began or to a comparable position, without decrease in rate of compensation or loss of promotional opportunities, or any other right or privilege of employment.
( e ) *Lactation time and space.* ( 1 ) A recipient must provide reasonable break time for an employee to express breast milk or breastfeed as needed.
( 2 ) A recipient must ensure that an employee can access a lactation space, which must be a space other than a bathroom that is clean, shielded from view, free from intrusion from others, and may be used by an employee for expressing breast milk or breastfeeding as needed.
[89 FR 33896, Apr. 29, 2024]
### §503. Repealed. Pub. L. 85–767, §2[1], Aug. 27, 1958, 72 Stat. 919

Section, act July 11, 1916, ch. 241, §8, 39 Stat. 358, related to appropriations for roads and trails, and cooperative agreements by the Secretary of Agriculture and States.
### §3076. Eligibility for witness security program

Any individual (and the immediate family of such individual) who furnishes information which would justify a reward by the Attorney General under this chapter or by the Secretary of State under section 36 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 may, in the discretion of the Attorney General, participate in the Attorney General's witness security program authorized under chapter 224 of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 98–533, title I, §101(a), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2707; amended Pub. L. 99–646, §45, Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3601.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 36 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956, referred to in text, is classified to section 2708 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.

#### Amendments

1986—Pub. L. 99–646 substituted "chapter 224 of this title" for "title V of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970".
§ 226.14 What funding priorities may the Secretary use in making a grant award? ( a ) The Secretary may award points to an application under a competitive preference priority regarding the capacity of charter schools to offer public school choice in those communities with the greatest need for this choice based on— ( 1 ) The extent to which the applicant would target services to geographic areas in which a large proportion or number of public schools have been identified for comprehensive support and improvement or targeted support and improvement under the ESEA;
( 2 ) The extent to which the applicant would target services to geographic areas in which a large proportion of students perform poorly on State academic assessments; and
( 3 ) The extent to which the applicant would target services to communities with large proportions of low-income students.
( b ) The Secretary may award points to an application under a competitive preference priority for applicants that have not previously received a grant under the program.
( c ) The Secretary may elect to consider the points awarded under these priorities only for proposals that exhibit sufficient quality to warrant funding under the selection criteria in § 226.12 of this part.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1855-0012) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7221d(b))
[70 FR 15003, Mar. 24, 2005, as amended at 87 FR 3661, Jan. 25, 2022]
### §3526. Cooperation of other Federal agencies and State governments; reimbursement of expenses

(a) Each Federal agency shall cooperate with the Attorney General in carrying out the provisions of this chapter and may provide, on a reimbursable basis, such personnel and services as the Attorney General may request in carrying out those provisions.

(b) In any case in which a State government requests the Attorney General to provide protection to any person under this chapter—

(1) the Attorney General may enter into an agreement with that State government in which that government agrees to reimburse the United States for expenses incurred in providing protection to that person under this chapter; and

(2) the Attorney General shall enter into an agreement with that State government in which that government agrees to cooperate with the Attorney General in carrying out the provisions of this chapter with respect to all persons.

(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §1208, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2162.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1984, see section 1210 of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as a note under section 3521 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 688

 654

 663

 659

 681

 677

 713

 707

 680

 754

 731

 737

 626

 549

 522

 480

 487

 491

 515

 489

 465

 475

 459

 441

 403

 396

 381

 415

 613

 611

 597

 591

 592

 558

 550

 519

 504

 558

 489

 515

 526

 494

 467

 438

 427

 438

 472

 473

 412

 391

 392

 357

 296

 298

 297

 297

 650

 625

 627

 625

 639

 617

 644

 627

 569

 642

 585

 644

 583

 523

 490

 459

 459

 469

 486

 480

 438

 430

 424

 405

 342

 340

 330

 355

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 1, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 418

 402

 403

 402

 411

 397

 414

 403

 368

 413

 378

 414

 376

 339

 319

 300

 300

 306

 316

 313

 287

 282

 278

 266

 227

 226

 220

 235

TOTAL 14,507

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Pacific Aerospace & Electronics, Inc.

         We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
on Form S-8, registrations statement numbers 333-29007, 333-39799, 333-66469,
and 333-36676, and on Form S-3, registration statement numbers 333-25177, 333-
41407, 333-66471, 333-35382, and 333-5011, of Pacific Aerospace & Electronics,
Inc., of our report dated July 28, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Pacific Aerospace & Electronics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of May 31,
1999 and 2000 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three year
period ended May 31, 2000, which report appears in the May 31, 2000 annual
report on Form 10-K/A of Pacific Aerospace & Electronics, Inc.

         Our report dated July 28, 2000 contains an explanatory paragraph that
states that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, which
raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Seattle, Washington
October 12, 2000
### subpart 1—standards and measures
§ 675.45 Allowable costs, Federal share, and institutional share. ( a ) *Allowable costs.* An institution participating in the Work-Colleges program may use its allocated and reallocated program funds to carry out the following activities: ( 1 ) Support the educational costs of qualified students through self-help payments or credits provided under the work-learning-service program within the limits of part F of title IV of the HEA.
( 2 ) Promote the work-learning-service experience as a tool of postsecondary education, financial self-help, and community service-learning opportunities.
( 3 ) Carry out activities in sections 443 or 446 of the HEA.
( 4 ) Administer, develop, and assess comprehensive work-learning-service programs including— ( i ) Community-based work-learning-service alternatives that expand opportunities for community service and career-related work; and
( ii ) Alternatives that develop sound citizenship, encourage student persistence, and make optimum use of assistance under the Work-Colleges program in education and student development.
( 5 ) Coordinate and carry out joint projects and activities to promote work-learning-service.
( 6 ) Carry out a comprehensive, longitudinal study of student academic progress and academic and career outcomes, relative to student self-sufficiency in financing their higher education, repayment of student loans, continued community service, kind and quality of service performed, and career choice and community service selected after graduation.
( b ) *Federal share of allowable costs.* An institution, in addition to the funds allocated and reallocated for this program, may use transferred funds provided under its Federal Perkins Loan or its FWS program to pay allowable costs.
( c ) *Institutional share of allowable costs.* An institution must match Federal funds made available for this program on a dollar-for-dollar basis from non-Federal sources. The institution shall keep records documenting the amount and source of its share.
(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2756b)
[59 FR 61418, Nov. 30, 1994, as amended at 64 FR 58294, Oct. 28, 1999; 75 FR 55950, Oct. 29, 2009]
#### § 104.61 Procedures.

The procedural provisions applicable to title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 apply to this part. These procedures are found in §§ 100.6-100.10 and part 101 of this title.
**Sanitized Description of Rotating Shift**
(No. 77-CC-1954

#### James T. Thomas, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 2, 1978.*

Polos, C.J.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that the property in question was lost while in the actual physical possession of the State of Illinois, and that the State.is liable as a bailee for the return of that property.

Claimant has established without contradiction that a Panasonic television set was delivered to the Stateville Correctional Center, after Claimant had ordered it from York Radio and T.V. of Decatur, Illinois, at a cost of $82.00, on April 26,1977, and delivered to the wrong resident through a clerical error.

Respondent has conceded liability for the loss of the set.

*728This Court held in *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1*deciding that the State has a duty to exercise reasonable care to safeguard and return an inmate’s property when it takes actual physical possession of such property during the course of the transfer of an inmate between penal institutions.

While bailment is ordinarily a voluntary contractual transaction between bailor and bailee, various types of constructive and involuntary bailments have been recognized:

> “A constructive bailment can be created between an owner of the property and one in possession thereof.” 4A Illinois Law and Practice 550, Bailments, citing *Chesterfield Sewer & Water, Inc., v. Citizens Insurance Co. of New Jersey, et al., 57 Ill. App. 2d 90, 207 NE2d 84.*

In *Chesterfield,*the Court quotes from *Woodson v. Hare, 244 Ala. 301, 13 So2d. 172, at 174,*as follows;

> “An actual contract or one implied in fact is not always necessary to create a bailment. Where, otherwise than by mutual contract of bailment, one person has lawfully acquired the possession of personal property of another and holds it under circumstances whereby he ought, upon principles of justice, to keep it safely and restore it or deliver it to the owner, such person and the owner of the property are, by operation of law, generally treated as bailee and bailor under a contract of bailment, irrespective of whether or not there has been any mutual assent, express or implied, to such relationship.”

The loss or damage to bailed property while in the possession of the bailee raises a presumption of negligence which the bailee must rebut by evidence of due care. The effect of this rule is not to shift the ultimate burden of proof from the bailor to the bailee, but simply to shift the burden of proceeding or going forward with the evidence.

At the trial of this cause the State presented no testimony to explain the disappearance of Claimant’s property, and presented no testimony of its freedom from negligence.

*729The presumption of the State’s negligence is thus unrebutted.

It is therefore ordered that Claimant be, and hereby is, awarded the sum of $82.00 in full satisfaction of this claim.
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT, SPLITTAIL and LONGFIN REPORT

October 2012

Note: Shaded area not verified with DFG data Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total D

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In 

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,494 4,356 7,850 6,931 

2-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,345 4,286 7,630 6,634 3-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,438 4,285 7,723 6,819 4-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,538 4,267 7,804 7,017 5-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,966 4,276 8,241 7,866 6-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,926 4,272 9,198 9,770 7-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,951 4,267 9,219 9,821 8-Oct-12 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 4,956 4,260 9,216 9,830 9-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,964 4,309 9,272 9,846 

10-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,201 4,404 9,605 10,316 

11-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,598 4,412 10,010 11,104 

12-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,930 4,402 9,332 9,778 

13-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,036 4,398 8,434 8,005 

14-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,476 4,404 7,880 6,894 

15-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,508 4,409 6,917 4,974 

16-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,155 4,422 6,578 4,275 

17-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,018 4,426 6,443 4,002 

18-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,478 4,425 5,903 2,931 

19-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,992 3,794 5,786 3,951 

20-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,047 3,486 5,533 4,060 

21-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,983 3,501 5,485 3,934 

22-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,990 3,454 5,445 3,948 

23-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,956 3,529 5,485 3,879 

24-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,009 3,519 5,528 3,985 

25-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 3,617 3,519 7,135 7,174 

26-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,440 3,508 9,948 12,774 

27-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,598 3,254 9,852 13,088 

28-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,652 1,419 8,071 13,195 

29-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 3,959 3,431 7,390 7,852 

30-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,491 3,505 6,996 6,925 

31-Oct-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,755 3,381 6,137 5,465 

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 4 5 9 XXXX 0 0 114,466 121,581 236,047 227,043 

Official data is posted on DFG's webpage.

Preliminary

Banks Tracy Combined Banks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>           DEC-31-1996

<CASH>                         14,791,381 
<SECURITIES>                         0    
<RECEIVABLES>                     418,438 
<ALLOWANCES>                         0    
<INVENTORY>                          0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               15,209,819 
<PP&E>                         60,103,528 
<DEPRECIATION>                (16,031,335)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 64,519,186 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,724,208 
<BONDS>                        41,079,673 
<COMMON>                             0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0    
<PREFERRED>                          0    
<OTHER-SE>                      5,299,134 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   64,519,186 
<SALES>                        11,005,766 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               11,796,272 
<CGS>                                0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   7,298,426 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  578,440 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              4,919,196 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (999,790)
<INCOME-TAX>                         0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (5,739,697)
<DISCONTINUED>                  4,928,723 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  (175,007)
<CHANGES>                            0    
<NET-INCOME>                     (985,981)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (5.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (5.72)


        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

11 a.m., Friday April 8, 2011.

# PLACE:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Surveillance and Enforcement Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield, 

Assistant Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2011-7706 Filed 3-29-11; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
#### In the Matter of John S. Shields, Appellant, against Harry W. Marsh et al., Constituting the Municipal Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 784

 769

 737

 728

 683

 783

 708

 784

 706

 717

 771

 795

 805

 793

 616

 728

 740

 732

 652

 603

 635

 652

 518

 650

 641

 592

 590

 422

 384

 476

 382

 380

 388

 375

 387

 335

 344

 375

 366

 333

 328

 333

 335

 341

 329

 349

 341

 357

 348

 347

 368

 354

 352

 352

 346

 333

 369

 371

 352

 384

 541

 553

 571

 526

 557

 531

 501

 517

 475

 503

 470

 484

 500

 563

 379

 481

 504

 509

 484

 466

 504

 465

 412

 498

 462

 428

 443

 401

 366

 413

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 350

 358

 369

 341

 360

 344

 326

 336

 310

 327

 306

 315

 325

 364

 250

 313

 327

 331

 315

 304

 327

 303

 271

 324

 302

 281

 290

 264

 242

 271

TOTAL 14,507

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
### SUBCHAPTER C—IMPRISONMENT

#### SUBCHAPTER C—IMPRISONMENT 1

Sec.
3621.
Imprisonment of a convicted person.
3622.
Temporary release of a prisoner.
3623.
Transfer of a prisoner to State authority.
3624.
Release of a prisoner.
3625.
Inapplicability of the Administrative Procedure Act.
3626.
Appropriate remedies with respect to prison conditions.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101[(a)] [title VIII, §802(c)], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321, 1321–70; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327, which directed that table of sections at beginning of subchapter C of this chapter be amended generally to read "3626. Appropriate remedies with respect to prison conditions.", was executed by making amendment in item 3626 to reflect the probable intent of Congress. Prior to amendment, item 3626 read as follows: "3626. Appropriate remedies with respect to prison crowding."

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–322, title II, §20409(c), title XXXIII, §330010(3), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1828, 2143, transferred analysis of this subchapter to follow heading for this subchapter and added item 3626.

1  So in original. Probably should not appear.