alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 29, 2013

d0422 

# Order

April 29, 2013

146668

In re Application of Consumers Energy

Company to Increase Rates.

________________________________________

PHILLIP FORNER,

Appellant,

v SC: 146668

COA: 296640

MPSC No: 00

- 015645

MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,

METAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RAVENNA

CASTING CENTER, and HEMLOCK

SEMICONDUCTOR CORP

. , Appellees,

and

CONSUMERS ENERGY CO.,

Petitioner

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 30, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, becau se we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 397.4 What regulations apply? ( a ) The regulations in 34 CFR part 300 governing the definition of transition services, and the Individualized Education Program requirements related to the development of postsecondary goals and the transition services needed to assist the eligible child in reaching those goals (§§ 300.320(b), 300.321(b), 300.324(c), and 300.43).
( b ) The regulations in 34 CFR part 361 governing the vocational rehabilitation program, especially those regarding protection and use of personal information in 34 CFR 361.38; eligibility determinations in 34 CFR 361.42; individualized plans for employment in 34 CFR 361.45 and 34 CFR 361.46; provision of vocational rehabilitation services, including pre-employment transition services, transition services, and supported employment services in 34 CFR 361.48; ineligibility determinations in 34 CFR 361.43; informed choice in 34 CFR 361.52; and case closures in 34 CFR 361.56.
( c ) The regulations in 29 CFR part 525 governing the employment of individuals with disabilities at subminimum wage rates pursuant to a certificate issued by the Secretary of Labor.
( d ) The regulations in this part 397.
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 102(a) and (b), 103(a), and 113 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c), 722(a) and (b), 723(a), and 733; sections 601(34) and 614(d)(1)(A)(i)(VIII) of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1401(34) and 1414(d)); and section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. 214(c))
Order entered October 3 1 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00723
- CR
AARON HOWARD KLOEPFE R, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Tria l Court Cause No. 296
- 81623
- 2012



### O RDER
The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure eff ective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.
T his appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
Exhibit 10(b)

	 
	
Amendment ONE



To THE



FPL Group, INC. Deferred Compensation Plan





	
In accordance with Section 6.06 of the FPL Group, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan"), as amended and restated effective January 1, 2003, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

	 
	 
	
FIRST:   Effective January 1, 2007, Section 3.02(b)(2)(ii) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

	 
	 
	
(ii)   Crediting Cash Dividends to the Phantom Stock Account.  The Administrator shall establish a cash account within each Participant's Phantom Stock Account (the "Cash Account").  The Cash Account shall be credited on each Dividend Payment Date with an amount equal to the amount of the cash dividends which a holder of Common Stock would have received if on the record date for the dividend the holder was the record holder of a number of shares of Common Stock equal to the number of Phantom Shares then credited to the Phantom Stock Account.  The Cash Account shall be credited quarterly with interest on the average weighted balance in such account at the end of the quarter at a rate equal to the lesser of: (1) the prime rate as such rate is published in the Wall Street Journal or (2) 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate, with compounding (as prescribed under Section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code), determined (in either case) on the last business day of the calendar quarter preceding the calendar quarter to which it applies.

	 
	
SECOND:   In all other respects, the Plan shall remain unchanged by this Amendment One.

	 
	
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, FPL Group, Inc. has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorized officer on this 18th day of October, 2007, and effective as set forth herein.

	
	

	
	

	
	
	
FPL GROUP, INC.

	
	

	
	

	
	
By:
	
ROBERT H. ESCOTO

	
	
	

	
	
	
Robert H. Escoto

	
	
Vice President, Human Resources
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. ST EVEN RI TC HA RD SC OTT, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 30220 D. C. No . 4 : 0 7 - c r - 0 0 1 3 4 - SE H ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe D i s tr i c tof

M ont a na S a m E . H a ddon, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r27, 2011 ** B efo re: H A W K IN S , S IL V E R M A N , an d W . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. S t even R i t char d S cottappeal s f rom the aggregat e 61-m on th sent ence im p o s e d u p o n r e - s e n te n c in g f o llo w in g as u c c e s s f

u l 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 5 m o tio n . P ur s ua ntt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 386 U . S . 738 ( 1967) , S c ott ’ s c ouns e l ha s f i l e d a bri ef st at i ng there ar e no g roun ds for r el i ef , al on g w i th a m ot i on t o w i thd raw as



# FI LED SEP 30 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 30220 2 c ouns e l of

r e c or d. S c ottf

i l e d apr o s e s uppl e m e nt a l br i e f , c ont e ndi ng tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourte rr e d i n c a l c ul a t i ng hi s c r i m i na l hi s t oryc a t e gorya nd, bye xt e ns i on, th e ap p lic ab le a d v is o ry g u id e lin e s r a n g e . C on traryt o S cott ’ s c on t ent i on , the re cord ref l ec t s thatthe di stri ctcourt c orr e c t l y c a l c ul a t e d tw o c r i m i na l hi s t orypoi nt s unde rU . S . S . G . § 4A 1. 1( b) f or S c ott ’ s 2002 f

or ge ry c onvi c t i on f

orw hi c h the s t a t e c ourti m pos e d as e nt e nc e of 90 d a y s im p r is o n m e n t. See U n i ted S ta tes v. Sch o m b u rg , 92 9 F . 2d 50 5, 50 7 (9th C i r. 1991) . M or e ove r , ouri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s ua ntt o P enson v. O h io , 48 8 U . S . 75 , 80 -81 (19 88 ), di sc l oses no ar gu abl e groun ds for r el i ef on di re ct ap p e a l. S c o tt’s u r g e n t m o tio n to e x p e d ite th e c a s e is d e n ie d a s m o o t. C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N T E D . AF F I RME D.
J. Parker Erkmann

T: +1 202 776 2036 perkmann@cooley.com VIA REGULATIONS.GOV AND EMAIL

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AV ENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTO N, DC 20004

- 2400 T: (202) 842

- 7800 F: (202) 842

- 7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM March 6 , 2015

Mr. Paul Gretch

Director

Office of International Aviation U.S. Department of Transportation

Room W86

- 316 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

RE: Polling Results for Joint Applicatio n of JetBlue Airways Corporation and Royal Air

Maroc for a Blanket Statement of Authorization and an Exemption

, DOT

- OST

- 2015

- 0046

- 0001

De ar Mr. Gretch :



### We have polled and received non

- objections from each of the carriers on the

attached service list for the above

- referenced joint application of JetBlue Airways Corporation (“JetBlue”) and Royal Air Maroc

. Prompt approval is requested so that JetBlue

and Air Maroc can initiate the proposed codeshare services on the routes which we re listed

in the Annex of the joint application on or about April 1 , 2015, provided all necessary approvals have been secured.

Sincerely,

J. Parker Erkmann Counsel for JetBlue Airways Corporation

CC: Don Hainbach, Esq.

JPE:ecMr. Paul Gretch March 6, 2015 Page Two

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AV ENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTO N, DC 20004

- 2400 T: (202) 842

- 7800 F: (202) 842

- 7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM 

### Service List

rpommer@atlasair.com Atlas Air
howard.kass@aa.com
robert.wirick@aa.com Abigail.donvan@aa.com American

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com
chris.walker@delta.com Delta

nssparks@fedex.com

anbird@fedex.com FedEx

thomas.bolling@united.com seve.morrissey@united.com

dan.weiss@united.com United

Jennifer.Nowak@hklaw.com
Anita.Mosner@hklaw.com UPS

robert.finamore@dot.gov brett.kruger@dot.gov brian.hedberg@dot.gov reese.davidson@dot.gov john.s.duncan@faa.gov englets@state.gov finstonma@state.gov cristinasa@state.gov

114655146
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**ERIN MCDONALD,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**WHITEWATER CHALLENGERS, INC.,**

**AND WHITEWATER CHALLENGERS OUTDOOR ADVENTURE CENTER,** 
**T/D/B/A WHITEWATER CHALLENGERS, INC.,** 

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 419 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

**ERIN MCDONALD,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**WHITEWATER CHALLENGERS, INC.,**

**AND WHITEWATER CHALLENGERS OUTDOOR ADVENTURE CENTER,** 
**T/D/B/A, WHITEWATER CHALLENGERS, INC.,** 

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 420 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 31st day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of**

**Appeal is** DENIED

**.**
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 499 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 499

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Small Business Act to clarify the treatment of certain 
surviving spouses under the definition of small business concern owned 
              and controlled by service-disabled veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Service-Disabled Veterans Small 
Business Continuation Act''.

SEC. 2. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT REGARDING TREATMENT OF CERTAIN SURVIVING 
              SPOUSES UNDER THE DEFINITION OF SMALL BUSINESS CONCERN 
              OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY SERVICE-DISABLED VETERANS.

    Effective on the date specified in subsection (e) of section 1832 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public 
Law 114-328; 130 Stat. 2660), section 3(q)(2) of the Small Business Act 
(15 U.S.C. 632(q)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (C)(i)(II), by striking ``rated as 100 
        percent'' and all that follows through ``service-connected 
        disability''; and
            (2) by amending subparagraph (C)(ii)(III) to read as 
        follows:
                            ``(III) the date that--
                                    ``(aa) in the case of a surviving 
                                spouse of a veteran with a service-
                                connected disability rated as 100 
                                percent disabling or who dies as a 
                                result of a service-connected 
                                disability, is 10 years after the date 
                                of the death of the veteran; or
                                    ``(bb) in the case of a surviving 
                                spouse of a veteran with a service-
                                connected disability rated as less than 
                                100 percent disabling who does not die 
                                as a result of a service-connected 
                                disability, is 3 years after the date 
                                of the death of the veteran.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 13, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 499

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Small Business Act to clarify the treatment of certain 
surviving spouses under the definition of small business concern owned 
              and controlled by service-disabled veterans.
```
#### Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant, v. J. J. Fisher Company, Inc., Respondent.

Ho opinion. Present — Martin, P, J,; Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

August-12

Note: Shaded area not verified with DFG data Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,399 3,684 9,083 10,708 7,308 1

2-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,663 4,184 9,847 11,233 8,299 1

3-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,097 4,396 11,493 14,077 8,720 2

4-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,191 4,394 11,585 14,263 8,715 2

5-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,191 4,376 11,567 14,264 8,680 2

6-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,122 4,368 11,490 14,127 8,663 2

7-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,309 4,357 11,667 14,498 8,643 2

8-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,500 4,356 10,857 12,893 8,641 2

9-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,096 4,346 11,442 14,075 8,621 2

10-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,453 4,369 10,821 12,799 8,665 2

11-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,256 4,378 10,634 12,409 8,683 2

12-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,432 4,379 10,810 12,757 8,685 2

13-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,334 4,386 10,720 12,564 8,699 2

14-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,072 4,397 11,469 14,027 8,721 2

15-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,196 4,404 11,600 14,273 8,736 2

16-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,990 4,387 11,377 13,865 8,702 2

17-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,717 4,375 11,092 13,323 8,678 2

18-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,486 4,357 10,843 12,865 8,642 2

19-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,186 4,347 10,533 12,269 8,623 2

20-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,969 4,350 10,319 11,840 8,628 2

21-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 6,001 4,347 10,348 11,902 8,623 2

22-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,966 4,352 11,319 13,818 8,633 2

23-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,940 4,372 11,312 13,766 8,671 2

24-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,219 4,382 10,601 12,336 8,692 2

25-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,106 4,393 9,499 10,128 8,714 1

26 Aug 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 454 4 362 8 816 8 834 8 653 1

Banks Tracy Combined Banks

Tracy Comb

26-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,454 4,362 8,816 8,834 8,653 127-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,098 4,469 8,567 8,129 8,864 128-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,368 4,420 8,788 8,664 8,767 129-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,388 4,410 8,799 8,704 8,748 130-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,651 4,410 9,061 9,226 8,747 131-Aug-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,446 4,406 9,852 10,803 8,739 1

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 0 4 4 XXXX 0 0 191,298 134,915 326,212 379,439 267,603 64

Official data is posted on DFG's webpage.
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT, SPLITTAIL and LONGFIN REPORT

October 2016

Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW data

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre Feet

Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval 

Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,972 4,064 7,035 5,894 8,060 13,954 0.0 0.0

2-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,024 3,992 7,016 5,999 7,918 13,917 0.0 0.0

3-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,804 3,927 6,731 5,562 7,789 13,351 0.0 0.0

4-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,946 4,048 6,995 5,844 8,030 13,874 0.0 0.0

5-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,892 3,989 6,881 5,736 7,912 13,648 0.0 0.0

6-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,946 3,986 6,932 5,843 7,906 13,749 0.0 0.0

7-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,863 3,990 6,853 5,678 7,915 13,593 0.0 0.0

8-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,055 3,998 7,054 6,060 7,931 13,991 0.0 0.0

9-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,936 3,991 7,928 7,808 7,917 15,725 0.0 0.0

10-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,262 4,003 5,265 2,503 7,940 10,443 0.0 0.0

11-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,239 4,002 6,240 4,441 7,937 12,378 0.0 0.0

12-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,918 4,007 5,925 3,804 7,948 11,752 0.0 0.0

13-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,937 3,457 5,394 3,843 6,856 10,699 0.0 0.0

14-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,821 3,236 5,057 3,612 6,418 10,030 0.0 0.0

15-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,986 3,231 5,218 3,940 6,409 10,349 0.0 0.0

16-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,115 3,239 5,354 4,195 6,424 10,619 0.0 0.0

17-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,941 3,248 5,189 3,850 6,443 10,293 0.0 0.0

18-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,008 3,246 5,254 3,983 6,439 10,422 0.0 0.0

19-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,040 3,236 5,276 4,046 6,418 10,464 0.0 0.0

20-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,178 3,225 6,403 6,304 6,397 12,701 0.0 0.0

21-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,198 3,237 6,435 6,344 6,420 12,764 0.0 0.0

22-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,857 4,027 6,884 5,667 7,987 13,654 0.0 0.0

23-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,848 4,090 6,938 5,649 8,113 13,762 0.0 0.0

24-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,749 4,099 6,848 5,453 8,130 13,583 0.0 0.0

25-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,534 4,091 6,625 5,026 8,115 13,141 0.0 0.0

26-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,882 4,089 6,971 5,716 8,110 13,826 0.0 0.0

27-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,037 4,078 7,115 6,023 8,089 14,112 0.0 0.0

28-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,868 4,084 8,951 9,655 8,100 17,755 0.0 0.0

29-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,500 4,083 8,583 8,925 8,099 17,024 0.0 0.0

30-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,414 4,089 8,503 8,755 8,111 16,866 0.0 0.0

31-Oct-16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,782 4,087 8,869 9,485 8,106 17,591 0.0 0.0

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 0 0 0 XXXX 0 0 88,552 118,168 206,720 175,643 234,387 410,030 XXXX XXXX

Official data is posted on CDFW's webpage.

DATE

Delta Smelt Daily 

Density

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Tracy Combined SWP CVP
#### § 73.1 Cross-reference to employee ethical conduct standards and financial disclosure regulations.

Employees of the Department of Education are subject to the executive branch-wide Standards of Ethical Conduct at 5 CFR part 2635 and to the Department of Education regulation at 5 CFR part 6301 which supplements the executive branch-wide standards with a requirement for employees to obtain prior approval to participate in certain outside activities. In addition, employees are subject to the executive branch-wide financial disclosure regulations at 5 CFR part 2634.
(No. 6947

#### Daniel N. Michel, Sheriff of Fayette County, Illinois, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Corrections, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 28, 1972.*

Daniel N. Michel, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
§ 463.2 What regulations apply to the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act programs? The following regulations apply to the Adult Education and Family Literacy Act programs: ( a ) The following Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR): ( 1 ) 34 CFR part 75 (Direct Grant Programs), except that 34 CFR 75.720(b), regarding the frequency of certain reports, does not apply.
( 2 ) 34 CFR part 76 (State-Administered Programs), except that 34 CFR 76.101 (The general State application) does not apply.
( 3 ) 34 CFR part 77 (Definitions that Apply to Department Regulations).
( 4 ) 34 CFR part 79 (Intergovernmental Review of Department of Education Programs and Activities).
( 5 ) 34 CFR part 81 (General Education Provisions Act—Enforcement).
( 6 ) 34 CFR part 82 (New Restrictions on Lobbying).
( 7 ) 34 CFR part 86 (Drug and Alcohol Prevention).
( 8 ) 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards), as adopted at 2 CFR part 3474.
( b ) The regulations in 34 CFR part 462.
( c ) The regulations in 34 CFR part 463.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAdvanced Spacesuit Informatics Software Design for Power, Avionics and Software Version 2.0A description of the software design for the 2016 edition of the Informatics computer assembly of the NASAs Advanced Extravehicular Mobility Unit (AEMU), also called the Advanced Spacesuit. The Informatics system is an optional part of the spacesuit assembly. It adds a graphical interface for displaying suit status, timelines, procedures, and warning information. It also provides an interface to the suit mounted camera for recording still images, video, and audio field notes.Document ID20160011965Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsWright, Theodore W.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredOctober 4, 2016Publication DateSeptember 1, 2016Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareAvionics And Aircraft InstrumentationInstrumentation And PhotographyReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2016-219149GRC-E-DAA-TN34487E-19272Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 854319.04.03.03.02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsInstrumentationDisplaySpace suitAvailable DownloadsNameType20160011965.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024