alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 648

 640

 638

 714

 765

 725

 716

 714

 710

 777

 776

 765

 761

 738

 731

 744

 751

 737

 755

 761

 735

 726

 722

 727

 727

 735

 732

 715

 722

 739

 741

 640

 633

 636

 619

 598

 620

 663

 696

 696

 693

 677

 735

 713

 699

 707

 693

 693

 669

 670

 684

 724

 710

 704

 713

 719

 718

 714

 699

 712

 711

 667

 644

 637

 637

 642

 682

 665

 687

 704

 704

 728

 743

 750

 746

 725

 723

 728

 733

 727

 728

 743

 730

 715

 711

 718

 723

 727

 723

 713

 714

 726

 709

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 15, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 414

 410

 410

 413

 437

 427

 441

 451

 451

 466

 475

 480

 477

 464

 463

 466

 469

 465

 466

 475

 467

 458

 455

 460

 463

 465

 463

 457

 457

 465

 454

TOTAL 21,985

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-6425, 33-14984, 33-33602, 33-42345,
33-69650, 33-58515, 33-64901, 333-15641, 333-39151, 333-43969, 333-46187,
333-53793, 333-57381, 333-73159, 333-75241, 333-84095, 333-33888, 333-57990 and
333-62320), on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-45541 and 333-62128) and on Form
S-4 (Registration No. 333-82695) of SunGard Data Systems Inc. of our report
dated February 11, 2003 relating to the financial statements, which appears in
the Annual Report to Stockholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 27, 2003
### §226. Bribery affecting port security

(a) In General.—Whoever knowingly—

(1) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any public or private person, with intent to commit international terrorism or domestic terrorism (as those terms are defined under section 2331), to—

(A) influence any action or any person to commit or aid in committing, or collude in, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud affecting any secure or restricted area or seaport; or

(B) induce any official or person to do or omit to do any act in violation of the lawful duty of such official or person that affects any secure or restricted area or seaport; or

(2) directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity in return for—

(A) being influenced in the performance of any official act affecting any secure or restricted area or seaport; and

(B) knowing that such influence will be used to commit, or plan to commit, international or domestic terrorism,

shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 15 years, or both.

(b) Definition.—In this section, the term "secure or restricted area" means an area of a vessel or facility designated as secure in an approved security plan, as required under section 70103 of title 46, United States Code, and the rules and regulations promulgated under that section.

(Added Pub. L. 109–177, title III, §309(a), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 241.)
### §514. Fictitious obligations

(a) Whoever, with the intent to defraud—

(1) draws, prints, processes, produces, publishes, or otherwise makes, or attempts or causes the same, within the United States;

(2) passes, utters, presents, offers, brokers, issues, sells, or attempts or causes the same, or with like intent possesses, within the United States; or

(3) utilizes interstate or foreign commerce, including the use of the mails or wire, radio, or other electronic communication, to transmit, transport, ship, move, transfer, or attempts or causes the same, to, from, or through the United States,

any false or fictitious instrument, document, or other item appearing, representing, purporting, or contriving through scheme or artifice, to be an actual security or other financial instrument issued under the authority of the United States, a foreign government, a State or other political subdivision of the United States, or an organization, shall be guilty of a class B felony.

(b) For purposes of this section, any term used in this section that is defined in section 513(c) has the same meaning given such term in section 513(c).

(c) The United States Secret Service, in addition to any other agency having such authority, shall have authority to investigate offenses under this section.

(Added Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(f) [title VI, §648(b)(1)], title II, §2603(b)(1), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–314, 3009–367, 3009–470.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 101(f) [title VI, §648(b)(1)] and 2603(b)(1) of div. A of Pub. L. 104–208 added identical sections 514.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Sept. 30, 1996, and to remain in effect for each fiscal year following Sept. 30, 1996, see section 101(f) [title VI, §648(c)] of Pub. L. 104–208, set out as an Effective Date of 1996 Amendment note under section 474 of this title.

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of the functions, personnel, assets, and obligations of the United States Secret Service, including the functions of the Secretary of the Treasury relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 381, 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 496

 480

 488

 541

 529

 526

 544

 544

 517

 495

 501

 528

 544

 509

 523

 544

 582

 565

 570

 581

 574

 577

 593

 604

 603

 616

 570

 557

 546

 562

 362

 362

 357

 365

 353

 357

 360

 350

 352

 367

 386

 386

 397

 413

 421

 431

 446

 417

 421

 410

 402

 393

 415

 446

 437

 478

 452

 454

 473

 464

 414

 409

 402

 407

 405

 408

 415

 418

 423

 425

 432

 459

 467

 469

 474

 492

 499

 493

 487

 491

 493

 494

 502

 523

 516

 550

 523

 512

 514

 522

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 15, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 272

 269

 264

 268

 266

 268

 272

 274

 277

 279

 283

 300

 305

 306

 309

 320

 324

 321

 317

 319

 321

 321

 326

 339

 335

 356

 339

 332

 334

 339

TOTAL 14,038

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
#### John Curtin, Appellant, v. Thomas Healy, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ.
### §§698v to 698v–10. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–291, div. B, title XXX, §3043(d)(1), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3798

Section 698v, Pub. L. 106–248, title I, §102, July 25, 2000, 114 Stat. 598, set forth findings and purposes of sections 698v to 698v–10 of this title.

Section 698v–1, Pub. L. 106–248, title I, §103, July 25, 2000, 114 Stat. 599, defined terms in sections 698v to 698v–10 of this title.

Section 698v–2, Pub. L. 106–248, title I, §104, July 25, 2000, 114 Stat. 600; Pub. L. 109–132, §2(a), Dec. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 2570; Pub. L. 113–287, §5(d)(20), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3266, related to acquisition of lands. Pursuant to section 698v–11(d)(2)(B) of this title, subsec. (g) of section 698v–2 remains in effect. For text of subsec. (g), see Pueblo of Santa Clara note under section 698v–11 of this title.

Section 698v–3, Pub. L. 106–248, title I, §105, July 25, 2000, 114 Stat. 602, related to establishment and management of Valles Caldera National Preserve.

Section 698v–4, Pub. L. 106–248, title I, §106, July 25, 2000, 114 Stat. 603; Pub. L. 109–132, §2(b)–(d), Dec. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 2570, 2571, related to establishment and purposes of Valles Caldera Trust.

Section 698v–5, Pub. L. 106–248, title I, §107, July 25, 2000, 114 Stat. 606; Pub. L. 109–132, §3, Dec. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 2571, related to Board of Trustees of Trust.

Section 698v–6, Pub. L. 106–248, title I, §108, July 25, 2000, 114 Stat. 607; Pub. L. 109–54, title IV, §432(a), Aug. 2, 2005, 119 Stat. 556; Pub. L. 109–132, §4, Dec. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 2571, related to management of land and resources of Preserve.

Section 698v–7, Pub. L. 106–248, title I, §109, July 25, 2000, 114 Stat. 610, related to authorities of the Secretary of Agriculture.

Section 698v–8, Pub. L. 106–248, title I, §110, July 25, 2000, 114 Stat. 611, related to termination of Trust.

Section 698v–9, Pub. L. 106–248, title I, §111, July 25, 2000, 114 Stat. 612, related to limitations on funding.

Section 698v–10, Pub. L. 106–248, title I, §112, July 25, 2000, 114 Stat. 612; Pub. L. 108–271, §8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814, related to Government Accountability Office studies.

See section 698v–11 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on the termination of the Valles Caldera Trust, see section 698v–11(d)(1) of this title.

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 106–248, title I, §101, July 25, 2000, 114 Stat. 598, which provided that title I of Pub. L. 106–248 (enacting sections 698v to 698v–10 of this title) could be cited as the "Valles Caldera Preservation Act", was repealed by Pub. L. 113–291, div. B, title XXX, §3043(d)(1), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3798, effective on the termination of the Valles Caldera Trust.

#### Termination of Valles Caldera Trust

Valles Caldera Trust to terminate 180 days after Dec. 19, 2014, unless the Secretary of the Interior determines that the date should be extended to facilitate the transitional management of the Valles Caldera National Preserve, see section 698v–11(c)(4)(A) of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM
10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,397,852
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,397,852
<PP&E>                                          54,967,055
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,161,762
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,312,009
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,476,545
<BONDS>                                         17,953,323
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,882,141
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,312,009
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,706,396
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,047,987
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   226,512
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,868,189
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,435,066
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,435,066
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,435,066
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        71.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        71.42
                                            


</TABLE>
§ 658.10 For what kinds of projects does the Secretary assist institutions of higher education? ( a ) The Secretary may provide assistance to an institution of higher education, a consortium of institutions of higher education, or a partnership between a nonprofit educational organization and an institution of higher education to plan, develop, and carry out a program to improve undergraduate instruction in international studies and foreign languages. Those grants must be awarded to institutions, consortia, or partnerships seeking to create new programs or to strengthen existing programs in foreign languages, area studies, and other international fields.
( b ) The Secretary gives consideration to an applicant that proposes a program that— ( 1 ) Initiates new or revised courses in international or area studies;
( 2 ) Makes instruction in foreign languages available to students in the program; and
( 3 ) Takes place primarily in the United States.
( c ) The program shall focus on— ( 1 ) International or global studies;
( 2 ) One or more world areas and their languages; or
( 3 ) Issues or topics, such as international environmental studies or international health.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1124(a))
[47 FR 14122, Apr. 1, 1982, as amended at 52 FR 28422, July 29, 1987; 58 FR 32576, June 10, 1993; 64 FR 7740, Feb. 16, 1999; 74 FR 35074, July 17, 2009]
#### Jacob Shoenfeld *et al. v.*Simon B. Fleisher *et al.*

1. *Factors—rights and, duty as to insurance.*Factors having the goods of their principals in their possession may insure them, but they are not-bound to do so, unless they have received orders to insure, or promise to insure, or the usage of trade or the habit of dealing between them and tlieir principal raises an obligation to insure.

3. If a factor, who is in any case required to insure the goods of his principal, fails to do so, lie becomes the insurer himself, and liable as such in the event of loss, and is entitled to credit for the premium which should have been paid.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. William A. Porter, Judge, presiding.

Mr. Egbert Jamieson, for the appellants.

Messrs. Hutchinson & Luff, for the appellees.

Mr. Justice McAllister

delivered the opinion of the Court:

It is the settled law that factors having the goods of their principal in their possession may insure them, but they are not bound to do so, unless they have received orders to insure or promise to insure, or the usage of trade or the habit of dealing between them and their principal raises an obligation to insure. Story on Ag. sec. 110; Parsons on Merc. Law, 160; *DeForest*v. *Fire Insurance Co.*1 Hall, 84; *Burban v.*Boyd, 4 Paige, 17; *Schaeffer v. Kirk,*49 Ill. 251.

And the further doctrine seems fully recognized, that if, in any of the cases mentioned, the agent neglect to make the insurance, he is himself, by the custom of merchants, to be considered as the insurer, and liable as such in the event of loss, in which case he is entitled to credit for the premium which should have been paid. Dunlap’s Paley on Ag. p. 18; *DeTastett*v. Crousillat, 2 Wash. C. C. R. 132-136; 1 Livermore on Ag. 324—326.

*405It appears, by the testimony of one of the plaintiffs, corroborated by that of plaintiffs’ clerk, that defendants, at the time of making the arrangement for taking the goods in question to sell on commission, promised to keep them insured. The defendant who made that arrangement on behalf of his firm, denies that any such promise was made; but, he not being corroborated by any testimony, the court below found for the plaintiffs upon that, which was really the only controverted question of fact in the case. The defendants admitted upon the trial their neglect to get the goods insured, their destruction by fire; and the quantity and value of the goods were undisputed.

We perceive no grounds for the reversal of the judgment, and it is accordingly affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before KISOR , BAKER , and DALY

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Aaren D. PAINTER Aviation Electrician’s Mate Petty Officer First Class (E

- 6 ), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 20 2300253

_________________________ Decided: 30 April 2024 Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge s : Michelle M. Pettit (trial) Derek D. Butler (entry of judgment) Sentence adjudged 18 July 2023 by a special court

- martial convened at Naval Base San Diego , California , consisting of a military judge sitting alone

. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment : reduction to E

- 5 , confinement for eight months, and a bad

- conduct discharge

. 1 For Appellant: Captain Kimberly D. Hinson , JAGC, USN

1 Appellant is credited with having served eight months of pretrial confinement.United States v. Painter , NMCCA No. 20 2300253 R Opinion of the Court

2 _________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________ PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to A ppellant ’s substantial rights occurred. 2 T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court

2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-36,232-02

EX PARTE DANIEL KELLER, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 924217-B IN THE 147 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

Per curiam. Johnson, J. filed a concurring opinion.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual

assault of a child and sentenced to forty-eight years’ imprisonment. The Third Court of Appeals

affirmed his conviction. Keller v. State, No. 03-92-00603-CR (Tex. App.—Austin Oct. 26, 1994)(not

designated for publication).

Applicant contends, among other things, that his conviction was based on the false testimony

of Dr. Michael Mouw. Dr. Mouw testified at Applicant’s original trial that he observed physical
2

indications of sexual abuse in the complainant. Dr. Mouw has now recanted that trial testimony. 

The trial court held a hearing during which Dr. Mouw testified that his testimony at Applicant’s

initial trial was misleading and that he now believes that what he believed to be trauma was actually

a normal variation in the complainant’s anatomy.

Based on the testimony at the writ hearing, the State and Applicant presented agreed findings

of fact to the trial court, recommending that relief be granted due to false evidence. The trial court

agreed and signed the findings. The trial court’s recommendation is supported by the record.

Applicant is entitled to relief. Ex parte Chavez, 371 S.W.3d 200, 206-207 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012);

Ex parte Ghahremani, 332 S.W.3d 470, 478 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). Applicant also alleges that

he is actually innocent of the offense. Based on both the trial court’s findings and this Court’s own

independent review of the record, those claims are denied.

Relief is granted on the basis of false testimony. The judgment in Cause No. 924220 in the

147 District Court of Travis County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the th

Sheriff of Travis County to answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue

any necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to theTexasDepartment of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: May 20, 2015

Do not publish
̄ 0 5 10 20

Miles

Potential Treatment Areas

Potential New Road Construction

Existing Road/Route

Main Roads

Non-National Forest System Lands

Forest Boundary

Legend

April, 2012

Sundance

Custer

Rapid

City

Deadwood

Lead

Sturgis

Hot

Springs

Edgemont

Wind Cave

National Park

Newcastle

Hill

City

Sand Creek

Beaver

Park

Cook

Lake

Rochford

Custer

State Park

Wilderness

Spearfish

§ ̈¦I-90

£¤16

Mountain Pine Beetle Response Project

Alternative C

Transportation Map

Black Hills National Forest

§ ̈¦I-90

§ ̈¦I-90

3385

3385

3385

316

316

316
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except *

as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARVIN ALEXANDER VALLE,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-70728

Agency No. A088-347-486

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 12, 2011** 

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

Marvin Alexander Valle, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se

for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, dismissing Valle’s

FILED

JUL 13 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-70728

appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture.

Valle contends that he was persecuted by gangs based on his resistance to

gang recruitment, and alleges that his family constitutes a social group because his

brother is a gang member. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination

that Valle failed to establish that any harm he suffered, or fears, from gangs is on

account of a protected ground. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 482-84

(1992) (forced recruitment by persecutors seeking to fill their ranks is not

necessarily persecution on account of political opinion); Barrios v. Holder, 581

F.3d 849, 855-56 (9th Cir. 2009) (petitioner who resisted gang recruitment did not

establish persecution on account of social group or political opinion); SantosLemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738, 747 (9th Cir. 2008); Molina-Estrada v. INS, 293

F.3d 1089, 1095 (9th Cir. 2002) (no compelling evidence the applicant was

persecuted on account of his family membership).

Valle alleges that his due process rights were violated by the immigration

judge, but the record demonstrates that Valle received a full and fair hearing. See

Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (no due process violation where

there is no showing of prejudice.)

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit G

Case 19-03028-KLP Doc 1-7 Filed 03/11/19 Entered 03/11/19 11:13:26 Desc

 Exhibit(s) G Page 1 of 2
Case 19-03028-KLP Doc 1-7 Filed 03/11/19 Entered 03/11/19 11:13:26 Desc

 Exhibit(s) G Page 2 of 2