alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean TDS

1 191 123 159 114

2 187 125 151 109

3 210 123 165 118

4 163 122 140 103

5 166 98 122 91

6 161 89 120 90

7 321 82 181 128

8 322 168 225 155

9 314 193 241 165

10 0 0 0 16

11 294 250 269 182

12 320 271 289 195

13 369 287 313 209

14 430 313 338 225

15 441 324 355 235

16 460 332 368 243

17 482 351 384 253

18 501 355 389 256

19 492 334 371 245

20 490 315 369 244

21 533 348 391 258

22 514 340 378 250

23 495 345 377 249

24 473 349 377 249

25 468 331 370 245

26 435 327 356 236

27 473 326 362 240

28 489 322 373 247

29 499 312 360 238

30 501 314 356 236

31 486 329 368 243

Total 9,017

COMMENT(S): 0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Headworks

Run Date: 4/14/2024

March 2024
### §204. Execution of transfers of copyright ownership

(a) A transfer of copyright ownership, other than by operation of law, is not valid unless an instrument of conveyance, or a note or memorandum of the transfer, is in writing and signed by the owner of the rights conveyed or such owner's duly authorized agent.

(b) A certificate of acknowledgement is not required for the validity of a transfer, but is prima facie evidence of the execution of the transfer if—

(1) in the case of a transfer executed in the United States, the certificate is issued by a person authorized to administer oaths within the United States; or

(2) in the case of a transfer executed in a foreign country, the certificate is issued by a diplomatic or consular officer of the United States, or by a person authorized to administer oaths whose authority is proved by a certificate of such an officer.

(Pub. L. 94–553, title I, §101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2570.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### house report no. 94–1476

Section 204 is a somewhat broadened and liberalized counterpart of sections 28 and 29 of the present statute [sections 28 and 29 of former title 17]. Under subsection (a), a transfer of copyright ownership (other than one brought about by operation of law) is valid only if there exists an instrument of conveyance, or alternatively a "note or memorandum of the transfer," which is in writing and signed by the copyright owner "or such owner's duly authorized agent." Subsection (b) makes clear that a notarial or consular acknowledgment is not essential to the validity of any transfer, whether executed in the United States or abroad. However, the subsection would liberalize the conditions under which certificates of acknowledgment of documents executed abroad are to be accorded prima facie weight, and would give the same weight to domestic acknowledgments under appropriate circumstances.
§ 650.33 What is the duration of a fellowship? ( a ) An individual may receive a fellowship for a doctoral degree program of study for a total of 48 months or the time required for receiving the doctoral degree, whichever is less.
( b ) ( 1 ) An individual may receive a fellowship for no more than 24 months for dissertation work, without the prior approval of the Secretary.
( 2 ) A fellow may apply to the Secretary for an additional period of fellowship support for dissertation work. The fellow's application must include— ( i ) The specific facts detailing the reasons why the additional period of dissertation work support is necessary;
( ii ) A certification by the institution that it is aware of the fellow's application and that the fellow has attained satisfactory progress in the fellow's academic studies; and
( iii ) A recommendation from the institution that the additional period of fellowship support for dissertation work is necessary.
( c ) A fellow who maintains satisfactory progress in the program of study for which the fellowship was awarded may have the fellowship renewed annually for the total length of time described in paragraph (a) of this section.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1134, 1134c)
<Page>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23
                                     CONSENT

We have issued our report dated January 29, 2002, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements of Sensar Corporation included in the
Annual Report of Sensar Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2001. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report
in the Registration Statements of Sensar Corporation on Forms S-3 (File No.
333-1505, effective March 22, 1996; File No. 333-6527, effective August 2,
1996; File No. 333-29923, effective October 3, 1997; File No. 333-49989,
effective May 29, 1998; File No. 333-81253, effective June 28, 1999 and File
No. 333-43320 filed on October 6, 2000) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-44784,
filed December 30, 1991; File No. 33-35751, filed July 5, 1990; File No.
333-24553, filed April 4, 1997; and File No. 333-38919 filed October 28,
1997).

                                                     /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP


Salt Lake City, Utah
January 29, 2002
§ 645.4 What are the grantee requirements for documenting the low-income and first-generation status of participants? ( a ) For purposes of documenting a participant's low-income status the following applies: ( 1 ) In the case of a student who is not an independent student, an institution shall document that the student is a low-income individual by obtaining and maintaining— ( i ) A signed statement from the student's parent or legal guardian regarding family income;
( ii ) Verification of family income from another governmental source;
( iii ) A signed financial aid application; or
( iv ) A signed United States or Puerto Rican income tax return.
( 2 ) In the case of a student who is an independent student, an institution shall document that the student is a low-income individual by obtaining and maintaining— ( i ) A signed statement from the student regarding family income;
( ii ) Verification of family income from another governmental source;
( iii ) A signed financial aid application; or
( iv ) A signed United States or Puerto Rican income tax return.
( b ) For purposes of documenting potential first generation college student status, documentation consists of a signed statement from a dependent participant's parent, or a signed statement from an independent participant.
( c ) A grantee does not have to revalidate a participant's eligibility after the participant's initial selection.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1840-0550) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-11)
[60 FR 4748, Jan. 24, 1995, as amended at 75 FR 65784, Oct. 26, 2010]
§ 606.21 What are the selection criteria for planning grants? The Secretary evaluates an application for a planning grant on the basis of the criteria in this section. ( a ) *Design of the planning process.* The Secretary reviews each application to determine the quality of the planning process that the applicant will use to develop a comprehensive development plan and an application for a development grant based on the extent to which— ( 1 ) The planning process is clearly and comprehensively described and based on sound planning practice;
( 2 ) The president or chief executive officer, administrators and other institutional personnel, students, and governing board members systematically and consistently will be involved in the planning process;
( 3 ) The applicant will use its own resources to help implement the project; and
( 4 ) The planning process is likely to achieve its intended results.
( b ) *Key personnel.* The Secretary reviews each application to determine the quality of key personnel to be involved in the project based on the extent to which— ( 1 ) The past experience and training of key personnel such as the project coordinator and persons who have key roles in the planning process are suitable to the tasks to be performed; and
( 2 ) The time commitments of key personnel are adequate.
( c ) *Project Management.* The Secretary reviews each application to determine the quality of the plan to manage the project effectively based on the extent to which— ( 1 ) The procedures for managing the project are likely to ensure effective and efficient project implementation; and
( 2 ) The project coordinator has sufficient authority, including access to the president or chief executive officer, to conduct the project effectively.
( d ) *Budget.* The Secretary reviews each application to determine the extent to which the proposed project costs are necessary and reasonable.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1840-0114) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1101 *et seq.*)
[64 FR 70147, Dec. 15, 1999, as amended at 70 FR 13373, Mar. 21, 2005]
Summary: Allegations of Unpaid Royalties Determined To Be a 

Reporting Error 

Report Date: May 5, 2020 Report Number: 19-0797 

The OIG investigated allegations that an oil and gas production company failed to properly 

account for oil produced from Federal leases in the Bakersfield, CA area, resulting in a loss of 

mineral royalties owed to the Federal Government. The company was required to account for 

and report its oil production to the U.S. Department of the Interior. 

We determined that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) discovered that the company’s 

recordkeeping contributed to a production reporting error of 400 barrels of oil, but an audit of the 

company’s operations did not disclose a loss of royalties. We found the company’s reported oil 

production volumes coincided with its recorded oil sales. 

This is a summary of an investigative report we issued to the BLM Acting Director and the 

Office of Natural Resources Revenue Director. 

Office of Investigations | Office of Inspector General | U.S. Department of the Interior | Washington, DC
§ 609.3 What regulations apply? The following regulations apply to this part: ( a ) The Department of Education General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) as follows: ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) The following sections of 34 CFR part 75 (Direct Grant Programs): §§ 75.1-75.104, 75.125-75.129, 75.190-75.192, 75.230-75.261, 75.500, 75.510-75.519, 75.524-75.534, 75.580-75.903, and 75.901;
( 3 ) 34 CFR part 77 (Definitions that Apply to Department Regulations).
( 4 ) 34 CFR part 79 (Intergovernmental Review of Department of Education Programs and Activities).
( 5 ) 34 CFR part 82 (New Restrictions on Lobbying).
( 6 ) [Reserved]
( 7 ) 34 CFR part 86 (Drug-Free Schools and Campuses).
( b ) The regulations in this part 609.
( c ) (1) 2 CFR part 180 (OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement)), as adopted at 2 CFR part 3485; and ( 2 ) 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards), as adopted at 2 CFR part 3474.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1063b)
[59 FR 38717, July 20, 1993, as amended at 79 FR 76101, Dec. 19, 2014]
#### § 1300.5 Due dates—interpretation.

If any deadline or due date in this part falls on a Saturday, Sunday or Federal holiday, the applicable deadline or due date shall be the next business day.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Alton L. Smith III, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Carolina Investment Partners LimitedPartnership; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluations; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyeffect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls. 

 

Date: March 29, 2004 

 

/s/ Alton L. Smith III

Alton L. Smith III, General Partner of Walsmith

Associates Two, General Partner of the Registrant
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 211 

Recognizing the Aviation Cadet Museum in Eureka Springs, Arkansas, as 

‘‘America’s National Aviation Cadet Museum’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 15, 2019 

Mr. BOOZMAN (for himself and Mr. COTTON) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the Aviation Cadet Museum in Eureka Springs, 

Arkansas, as ‘‘America’s National Aviation Cadet Museum’’. 

Whereas, in 1994, former Aviation Cadet and United States 

Air Force First Lieutenant Errol Severe founded the 

Aviation Cadet Museum; 

Whereas the flying cadet and succeeding aviation cadet programs served as the primary production source of nearly 

500,000 United States Air Force pilots, navigators, and 

bombardiers from 1917 to 1961; 

Whereas the bravery, courage, dedication, and heroism of 

United States aviators from across the Air Corps and 

Army Air Forces were critical factors in defeating the enemies of the United States during World War I and 

World War II; 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 211 IS 

Whereas the Aviation Cadet Museum in Eureka Springs, Arkansas, exists to exclusively preserve and promote an understanding of the role of aviation cadets in the 20th century; and 

Whereas the Aviation Cadet Museum is dedicated to celebrating the spirit of the United States and recognizing 

the teamwork, collaboration, patriotism, and courage of 

the individuals who trained and fought and the individuals on the homefront who mobilized and supported the 

national aviation effort: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate recognizes the Aviation 

2 Cadet Museum in Eureka Springs, Arkansas, as ‘‘Amer3 ica’s National Aviation Cadet Museum’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
§ 462.2 What regulations apply? The following regulations apply to this part: ( a ) The Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) as follows: ( 1 ) 34 CFR part 76 (State-Administered Programs).
( 2 ) 34 CFR part 77 (Definitions that Apply to Department Regulations).
( 3 ) 34 CFR part 79 (Intergovernmental Review of Department of Education Programs and Activities).
( 4 ) 34 CFR part 81 (General Education Provisions Act—Enforcement).
( 5 ) 34 CFR part 82 (New Restrictions on Lobbying).
( 6 ) 34 CFR part 84 (Governmentwide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Financial Assistance)).
( 7 ) 34 CFR part 86 (Drug and Alcohol Abuse Prevention).
( 8 ) 34 CFR part 97 (Protection of Human Subjects).
( 9 ) 34 CFR part 98 (Student Rights in Research, Experimental Programs, and Testing).
( 10 ) 34 CFR part 99 (Family Educational Rights and Privacy).
( b ) The regulations in this part 462.
( c ) (1) 2 CFR part 180 (OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement)), as adopted at 2 CFR part 3485; and ( 2 ) 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards), as adopted at 2 CFR part 3474.
(Authority: 29 U.S.C. 3292)
[81 FR 55551, Aug. 19, 2016]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 422

 419

 436

 449

 453

 445

 434

 432

 457

 438

 424

 436

 460

 469

 464

 466

 457

 439

 426

 425

 432

 433

 443

 435

 433

 416

 407

 419

 417

 419

 362

 361

 359

 365

 367

 369

 371

 371

 377

 369

 392

 415

 425

 434

 415

 396

 382

 366

 357

 362

 372

 372

 390

 383

 379

 384

 381

 377

 371

 364

 381

 382

 387

 388

 396

 400

 400

 404

 412

 404

 413

 425

 444

 451

 448

 433

 418

 404

 393

 393

 403

 402

 415

 412

 405

 399

 397

 396

 392

 388

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:October 15, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 251

 252

 255

 256

 261

 263

 263

 266

 271

 266

 271

 279

 290

 295

 293

 284

 274

 266

 259

 259

 265

 264

 272

 271

 266

 263

 261

 261

 258

 256

TOTAL 12,185

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 903

 917

 943

 945

 919

 884

 920

 967

 963

 909

 907

 938

 945

 960

 958

 945

 940

 903

 899

 866

 896

 890

 907

 867

 881

 864

 922

 908

 926

 938

 941

 893

 894

 919

 921

 878

 872

 886

 922

 913

 870

 870

 908

 938

 941

 946

 912

 881

 876

 860

 835

 860

 798

 824

 800

 860

 807

 814

 865

 895

 906

 903

 900

 902

 935

 938

 896

 876

 903

 947

 946

 885

 885

 926

 943

 949

 950

 923

 913

 885

 874

 847

 880

 837

 877

 821

 870

 834

 884

 882

 906

 925

 927

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 3, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 572

 573

 594

 596

 570

 557

 574

 601

 601

 563

 563

 588

 599

 602

 603

 586

 580

 563

 556

 539

 560

 533

 558

 523

 554

 531

 562

 561

 576

 588

 589

TOTAL 27,866

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
§ 668.95 Termination. ( a ) *A termination* — ( 1 ) Ends an institution's participation in a Title IV, HEA program or ends a third-party servicer's eligibility to contract with any institution to administer any aspect of the institution's participation in a Title IV, HEA program;
( 2 ) Ends the authority of a third-party servicer to administer any aspect of any institution's participation in that program;
( 3 ) Prohibits an institution or third-party servicer, as applicable, or the Secretary from making or increasing awards under that program;
( 4 ) Prohibits an institution or third-party servicer, as applicable, from making any other new commitments of funds under that program; and
( 5 ) If an institution's participation in the Federal Stafford Loan Program or Federal PLUS programs has been terminated, prohibits further guarantee commitments by the Secretary for loans under that program to students to attend that institution, and, if the institution is a lender under that program, prohibits further disbursements by the institution (whether or not guarantee commitments have been issued by the Secretary or a guaranty agency for those disbursements).
( b ) After its participation in a Title IV, HEA program has been terminated, an institution may disburse or deliver funds under that Title IV, HEA program to students enrolled at the institution only in accordance with § 668.26 and with any additional requirements imposed under this part.
( c ) If a third-party servicer's eligibility is terminated, the servicer must return to each institution that contracts with the servicer any funds received by the servicer under the applicable Title IV, HEA program on behalf of the institution or the institution's students or otherwise dispose of those funds under instructions from the Secretary. The servicer also must return to each institution that contracts with the servicer all records pertaining to the servicer's administration of that program on behalf of that institution.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1094)
[59 FR 22450, Apr. 29, 1994, as amended at 63 FR 40626, July 29, 1998. Redesignated at 82 FR 6257, Jan. 19, 2017]
### §962. Reduction of bycatch in eastern tropical Pacific Ocean

The Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce and acting through the United States Commissioners, shall seek, in cooperation with other nations whose vessels fish for tuna in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean, to establish standards and measures for a bycatch reduction program for vessels fishing for yellowfin tuna in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean. The bycatch reduction program shall include measures—

(1) to require, to the maximum extent practicable, that sea turtles and other threatened species and endangered species are released alive;

(2) to reduce, to the maximum extent practicable, the harvest of nontarget species;

(3) to reduce, to the maximum extent practicable, the mortality of nontarget species; and

(4) to reduce, to the maximum extent practicable, the mortality of juveniles of the target species.

(Sept. 7, 1950, ch. 907, §15, as added Pub. L. 105–42, §7(c), Aug. 15, 1997, 111 Stat. 1138; amended Pub. L. 114–81, title II, §209, Nov. 5, 2015, 129 Stat. 664.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 7(c) of Pub. L. 105–42, which directed the addition of this section at the end of the Tuna Conventions Act, was executed by adding this section at the end of the Tuna Conventions Act of 1950, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

#### Amendments

2015—Pub. L. 114–81 substituted "vessels" for "vessel" in introductory provisions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon certification by Secretary of Commerce that sufficient funding is available to complete first year of study required by section 1414a(a) of this title and that study has commenced, and certification by Secretary of State to Congress that binding resolution of Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission or other legally binding instrument establishing International Dolphin Conservation Program has been adopted and is in force, see section 8 of Pub. L. 105–42, set out as an Effective Date of 1997 Amendment note under section 1362 of this title.