alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 381.22 How does the Secretary allocate funds under this program? ( a ) In any fiscal year in which the amount appropriated for this program is equal to or greater than $5,500,000— ( 1 ) The Secretary sets aside not less than 1.8 percent but not more than 2.2 percent of the amount appropriated to provide a grant, contract, or cooperative agreement for training and technical assistance to eligible systems carrying out activities under this part.
( 2 ) After the reservation required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the Secretary makes allotments from the remainder of the amount appropriated in accordance with section 509(c)(2)-(d) of the Act.
( b ) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in any fiscal year in which the amount appropriated for this program is equal to or greater than $5,500,000, the Secretary pays directly to an eligible system that submits an application that meets the requirements of § 381.10 the amount of the allotment to the State pursuant to section 509 of the Act, unless the State provides otherwise.
( c ) For any fiscal year in which the amount appropriated to carry out this program equals or exceeds $10,500,000, the Secretary shall reserve a portion, and use the portion to make a grant for the eligible system serving the American Indian Consortium. The Secretary shall make the grant in an amount of not less than $50,000 for the fiscal year.
( d ) Reallotment: ( 1 ) For any fiscal year in which the amount appropriated to carry out this program equals or exceeds $5,500,000 and if the Secretary determines that any amount of an allotment to an eligible system within a State will not be expended by such system in carrying out the provisions of this part, the Secretary shall make such amount available to one or more of the eligible systems that the Secretary determines will be able to use additional amounts during such year for carrying out this part.
( 2 ) Any reallotment amount made available to an eligible system for any fiscal year shall, for the purposes of this section, be regarded as an increase in the eligible system's allotment under this part for that fiscal year.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 509(c)-(e) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 794e(c)-(e))
§ 648.70 What conditions must be met by a fellow? To continue to be eligible for a fellowship, a fellow must— ( a ) Maintain satisfactory progress in the program for which the fellowship was awarded;
( b ) Devote essentially full time to study or research in the academic field in which the fellowship was awarded; and
( c ) Not engage in gainful employment, except on a part-time basis in teaching, research, or similar activities determined by the academic department to be in support of the fellow's progress toward a degree.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1135c)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 461

 408

 377

 382

 399

 373

 406

 390

 386

 381

 385

 428

 417

 412

 413

 0

 0

 398

 458

 472

 442

 431

 468

 458

 453

 500

 503

 502

 491

 506

 481

 355

 346

 343

 336

 337

 341

 334

 349

 348

 343

 334

 330

 334

 327

 339

 0

 0

 359

 362

 372

 369

 387

 377

 387

 388

 391

 392

 386

 390

 391

 400

 392

 366

 360

 354

 354

 352

 361

 370

 369

 361

 355

 355

 355

 354

 359

 0

 0

 377

 399

 404

 392

 406

 413

 407

 413

 419

 422

 423

 427

 434

 426

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 2, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 258

 242

 238

 235

 235

 234

 239

 245

 244

 239

 235

 235

 235

 235

 238

 0

 0

 249

 263

 266

 258

 267

 271

 268

 271

 275

 277

 277

 280

 284

 279

TOTAL 11,179

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
§ 656.23 What priorities may the Secretary establish? ( a ) The Secretary may select one or more of the following funding priorities: ( 1 ) Specific countries or world areas, such as, for example, East Asia, Africa, or the Middle East.
( 2 ) Specific focus of a Center, such as, for example, a single world area; international studies; a particular issue or topic, e.g., business, development issues, or energy; or any combination.
( 3 ) Level or intensiveness of language instruction, such as intermediate or advanced language instruction, or instruction at an intensity of 10 contact hours or more per week.
( 4 ) Types of activities to be carried out, for example, cooperative summer intensive language programs, course development, or teacher training activities.
( b ) The Secretary may select one or more of the activities listed in § 656.5 as a funding priority.
( c ) The Secretary announces any priorities in the application notice published in the Federal Register.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1122)
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

November 18, 2008 

Michael H. Scheible 

Deputy Executive Officer 

California Air Resources Board 

Post Office Box 28 15 

Sacramento, CA 958 12 

Dear vfl 

' On October 20,2008, CARB submitted revisions to the California State Implementation 

Plan (SIP). We have reviewed materials submitted with the following rules and found that they 

hlfill the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix V. 

Printed on Recycled Papcr 

APCDIAQMD Rule # Rule Title 

Antelope Valley 465 Vacuum Producing Devices Or Systems (rescinded) 

Antelope Valley 466 Pumps And Compressors (rescinded) 

Antelope Valley 466.1 Valves And Flanges (rescinded) 

Antelope Valley 467 Pressure Relief Devices (rescinded) 

Antelope Valley 

Mojave Desert 

Mojave Desert 

Mojave Desert 

1173 

203.1 

203.2 

213 

Fugitive Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds 

Special Permit Provisions (rescinded) 

Eligibility of Compensatory (rescinded) 

Standards for Permits to Construct: Air Quality 

Impact (rescinded) 

Mojave Desert 2 13.1 Standards for Permits to Operate: Air Quality Impact 

(rescinded) 

Mojave Desert 213.2 Definitions for Rules 213, 213.1, and 213.3 

Mojave Desert 2 13.3 Additional Standards for Permits to Construct and 

Santa Barbara County 

Santa Barbara County 

Santa Barbara County 

202 

333 

339 

Exemptions to Rule 201 

Control of Emissions from Reciprocating Internal 

Combustion Engines 

Motor Vehcle and Mobile Equipment Coating 

Operations 
This addresses all revisions in this submittal. In the coming months we will review the 

complete revisions for action pursuant to Clean Air Act section 110(k). 

Questions regarding our completeness review should be directed to Cynthia F. Allen at 

(415) 947-4120. 

Sincerely, 

Director, Air Division 

Cc: Mr. Eldon Heaston 

Executive Director 

Antelope Valley AQMD 

Mojave Desert AQMD 

Mr. Terry Dressler, APCO 

Santa Barbara County APCD 

Mr. Jorge L. Fernandez, Chief 

Program Evaluation Branch, CARB
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40676

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

APOLONIO GALLARDO-LUNA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:08-CR-123-1

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Apolonio GallardoLuna has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gallardo-Luna has not filed a

response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 30, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 216

 204

 192

 187

 193

 200

 203

 230

 250

 245

 337

 343

 336

 346

 371

 359

 393

 408

 399

 371

 419

 434

 418

 408

 421

 430

 464

 477

 481

 463

 447

 178

 174

 176

 164

 168

 167

 167

 174

 218

 205

 201

 279

 293

 314

 326

 324

 353

 371

 358

 340

 351

 394

 383

 376

 379

 389

 410

 458

 457

 396

 339

 195

 188

 184

 178

 181

 185

 188

 192

 235

 225

 240

 312

 325

 336

 350

 336

 372

 390

 377

 353

 393

 414

 400

 396

 405

 409

 436

 468

 468

 439

 391

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 13, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 137

 132

 130

 126

 128

 130

 132

 135

 161

 155

 164

 209

 217

 224

 232

 224

 246

 257

 249

 234

 259

 272

 263

 261

 266

 269

 285

 305

 305

 287

 258

TOTAL 9,961

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
§ 660.30 How does the Secretary evaluate an application? ( a ) The Secretary evaluates an application for a research project, a study, or a survey on the basis of the criteria in §§ 660.31 and 660.32. The Secretary informs applicants of the maximum possible score for each criterion in the application package or in a notice published in the Federal Register.
( b ) The Secretary evaluates an application for the development of specialized instructional materials on the basis of the criteria in §§ 660.31 and 660.33. The Secretary informs applicants of the maximum possible score for each criterion in the application package or in a notice published in the Federal Register.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1125)
[70 FR 13375, Mar. 21, 2005]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6876

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAVID RICH, a/k/a Oakie,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:08-cr-00438-RDB-1; 1:17-cv-03731-RDB)

Submitted: September 13, 2018 Decided: September 18, 2018

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Rich, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

David Rich seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 

336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner 

must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the 

motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 

484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rich has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We also deny Rich’s motion to place the appeal in abeyance for another 

appeal pending with this court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### Marcus Greenberg, Respondent, v. Timothy J. Kieley, Appellant, Impleaded with Leopold Schiller, Defendant.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to appellant to withdraw his demurrer and answer upon the merits, within twenty days, upon payment of all costs to date. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.
### §407h. Authorization of appropriations

There are hereby authorized to be appropriated not more than $500 to carry out the purposes of sections 407e to 407h of this title.

(Pub. L. 88–249, §4, Dec. 30, 1963, 77 Stat. 819.)
### §502. Postage and revenue stamps of foreign governments

Whoever forges, or counterfeits, or knowingly utters or uses any forged or counterfeit postage stamp or revenue stamp of any foreign government, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 713; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(G), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §349 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §220, 35 Stat. 1132; May 26, 1926, ch. 396, 44 Stat. 653).

A paragraph defining "foreign government" was combined with other like provisions to form section 11 of this title. A proviso against repeal, "Provided, however, That nothing in this section shall be held to repeal or modify section 350 of this title [now section 504 of this title]", was deleted as unnecessary since that section by express reference to this one makes it clear that these sections are in pari materia.

Minor changes in phraseology were also made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $500".
### §797d. Third party contracting by FERC

#### (a) Environmental impact statements

Where the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is required to prepare a draft or final environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 and following) in connection with an application for a license under part I of the Federal Power Act [16 U.S.C. 791a et seq.], the Commission may permit, at the election of the applicant, a contractor, consultant or other person funded by the applicant and chosen by the Commission from among a list of such individuals or companies determined by the Commission to be qualified to do such work, to prepare such statement for the Commission. The contractor shall execute a disclosure statement prepared by the Commission specifying that it has no financial or other interest in the outcome of the project. The Commission shall establish the scope of work and procedures to assure that the contractor, consultant or other person has no financial or other potential conflict of interest in the outcome of the proceeding. Nothing herein shall affect the Commission's responsibility to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.

#### (b) Environmental assessments

Where an environmental assessment is required under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 and following) in connection with an application for a license under part I of the Federal Power Act [16 U.S.C. 791a et seq.], the Commission may permit an applicant, or a contractor, consultant or other person selected by the applicant, to prepare such environmental assessment. The Commission shall institute procedures, including pre-application consultations, to advise potential applicants of studies or other information foreseeably required by the Commission. The Commission may allow the filing of such applicant-prepared environmental assessments as part of the application. Nothing herein shall affect the Commission's responsibility to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.

#### (c) Effective date

This section shall take effect with respect to license applications filed after October 24, 1992.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title XXIV, §2403, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3097.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), is Pub. L. 91–190, Jan. 1, 1970, 83 Stat. 852, which is classified generally to chapter 55 (§4321 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4321 of Title 42 and Tables.

The Federal Power Act, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), is act June 10, 1920, ch. 285, 41 Stat. 1063. Part I of the Act is classified generally to this subchapter (§791a et seq.). For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 791a of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Energy Policy Act of 1992, and not as part of the Federal Power Act which generally comprises this chapter.
# Official Journal C 245/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.245.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 245 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5514 August 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.245.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 245

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5514 August 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 245/01 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 2006/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the harmonisation of the laws of Member States relating to electrical equipment designed for use within certain voltage limits(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive)
   (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 245/01

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 2006/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the harmonisation of the laws of Member States relating to electrical equipment designed for use within certain voltage limits(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive)
   (1)

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### § 637.4 What definitions apply to the Minority Science and Engineering Improvement Program?

(a) *Definitions in EDGAR.* The following terms used in this part are defined in 34 CFR part 77.

- Applicant
- Application
- Department
- EDGAR
- Grants
- Grantee
- Nonprofit
- Private
- Project
- Project period
- Secretary

(b) *Definitions that apply to this part:*

*Accredited* means currently certified by a nationally recognized accrediting agency or making satisfactory progress toward achieving accreditation.

*Act* means the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended.

*Minority* means American Indian, Alaskan Native, black (not of Hispanic origin), Hispanic (including persons of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, and Central or South American origin), Pacific Islander or other ethnic group underrepresented in science and engineering.

*Minority institution* means an accredited college or university whose enrollment of a single minority group or a combination of minority groups as defined in this section exceeds fifty percent of the total enrollment. The Secretary verifies this information from the data on enrollments (Higher Education General Information Surveys HEGIS XIII) furnished by the institution to the Office for Civil Rights, Department of Education.

*Science* means, for the purposes of this program, the biological, engineering, mathematical, physical, behavorial and social sciences, and the history and philosophy of science; also included are interdisciplinary fields which are comprised of overlapping areas among two or more sciences.

*Underrepresented in science and engineering* means a minority group whose number of scientists and engineers per 10,000 population of that group is substantially below the comparable figure for scientists and engineers who are white and not of Hispanic origin.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1067-1067c, 1067g-1067k, 1068, 1068b)

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1135b-1135b-3 and 1135d-5)

[46 FR 51204, Oct. 16, 1981, as amended at 52 FR 43544, Nov. 12, 1987; 65 FR 7675, Feb. 15, 2000]
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated August
4, 1995, relating to the June 30, 1995, financial statements of Larson Davis
incorporated, appearing in the amended annual report of Larson Davis
incorporated on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 1996, into the
following registration statements filed on behalf of Larson Davis Incorporated:
registration statement on Form S-8, SEC File No. 33-35751, filed July 5, 1990;
registration statement on Form S-8, SEC File No. 33-44784, filed December 30,
1991; registration statement on Form S-3, SEC No. 333-1505, effective as of
March 22, 1996; and registration statement on Form S-3, SEC No. 333-6527,
effective as of August 2, 1996.


/s/ Pritchett, Siler & Hardy, P.C.


PRITCHETT, SILER & HARDY, P.C.

Salt Lake City, Utah
March 26, 1997
### §3528. Definition

For purposes of this chapter, the term "State" means each of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory or possession of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §1208, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2163.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1984, see section 1210 of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as a note under section 3521 of this title.
Order filed, January 4, 2013

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 01108

- CR

____________ EX PARTE GLENFORD RO BERT MCCALLUM , Appellant

On Appeal from the 344th District Court Chambers County, Texas Tria l Court Cause No. 11924

- A



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due December 28, 2012

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the
record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Rossana Bobbitt , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 10 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 759

 878

 861

 817

 765

 738

 707

 662

 651

 663

 683

 724

 733

 746

 771

 799

 862

 879

 882

 882

 871

 884

 883

 801

 867

 915

 975

 916

 981

 954

 950

 505

 522

 518

 482

 492

 534

 553

 520

 502

 496

 516

 555

 543

 555

 578

 661

 656

 626

 557

 677

 742

 672

 661

 567

 503

 444

 463

 511

 693

 517

 510

 574

 698

 716

 635

 633

 649

 630

 590

 580

 593

 605

 649

 642

 651

 658

 725

 774

 759

 729

 767

 802

 793

 767

 707

 669

 662

 683

 696

 827

 712

 710

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 2, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 371

 447

 458

 408

 407

 417

 405

 381

 374

 382

 390

 417

 413

 418

 423

 464

 494

 485

 467

 490

 512

 506

 490

 453

 429

 425

 438

 446

 527

 456

 455

TOTAL 21,285

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21