alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Kim Boyce, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report (the Report) on Form 10-QSB of the small business issuer;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;  4.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:May 21, 2007By:/s/Kim BoyceKim Boyce, President and Director
#### Margaret Jennings, Respondent, v. Mary Dziadik, Appellant.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
#### § 104.36 Procedural safeguards.

A recipient that operates a public elementary or secondary education program or activity shall establish and implement, with respect to actions regarding the identification, evaluation, or educational placement of persons who, because of handicap, need or are believed to need special instruction or related services, a system of procedural safeguards that includes notice, an opportunity for the parents or guardian of the person to examine relevant records, an impartial hearing with opportunity for participation by the person's parents or guardian and representation by counsel, and a review procedure. Compliance with the procedural safeguards of section 615 of the Education of the Handicapped Act is one means of meeting this requirement.

[45 FR 30936, May 9, 1980, as amended at 65 FR 68054, Nov. 13, 2000]
• I Ki._r . I i-^ r

- .T'DT'-T-r.]. - < .••\\l\ fw.' ' ' I , - ^^^•;- i •

•Tlf i " 0 ! -.y i •••

: mUiV O


### " ^ 3 ^ 5 2
Ma y 16 ^ 201 1 U.S , Departmen t o fTransportatio n Offic e o fAviatio n Analysi s Essentia l Ai rServic e (EAS ) Washington , D

C Attention ; Michae l IVIarti n

Developmen t Progra m

Re : DOCKE TDOT-OST-1999-624 5 Dea rSir , Taqua n Ai rha s provide d excellen t mai l servic e t o Hydabur g durin g th e pas t fou ryears . W e woul d lik e thi s t o continue . Th e carrie ri s reliabl e an d a t time s has t o operat e unde r difficul t weathe rconditions . i t i s ou rrecommendatio n tha t a ne wEA S b e Issue d t o Taqua n Ai rfo rIHydaburg , AKmal l service . 

### Sincerely , Diedr a Guthri e Postmaste r Hydaburg , A K9992 2

T ' d QTc;Rc;aSZ.D G 9Mn0UaA H SdS n WdG I tr ? T TD 3 L I Ke w
###### Editorial Note on Part 674

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 674 appear at 65 FR 18002, 18003, Apr. 6, 2000.

#### § 674.65 Severability.

If any provision of this subpart or its application to any person, act, or practice is held invalid, the remainder of the subpart or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or practice will not be affected thereby.

[87 FR 66046, Nov. 1, 2022]
§ 387.30 What additional selection criteria are used under this program? In addition to the criteria in 34 CFR 385.31(c), the Secretary uses the following additional selection criteria to evaluate an application: ( a ) *Relevance to State-Federal rehabilitation service program.* ( 1 ) The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows that the proposed project appropriately relates to the mission of the State-Federal rehabilitation service program.
( 2 ) The Secretary looks for information that shows that the project can be expected either— ( i ) To increase the supply of trained personnel available to public and private agencies involved in the rehabilitation of individuals with disabilities; or
( ii ) To maintain and improve the skills and quality of rehabilitation personnel.
( b ) *Nature and scope of curriculum.* ( 1 ) The Secretary reviews each application for information that demonstrates the adequacy and scope of the proposed curriculum.
( 2 ) The Secretary looks for information that shows that— ( i ) The scope and nature of the training content can be expected to enable the achievement of the established project objectives of the training project;
( ii ) The curriculum and teaching methods provide for an integration of theory and practice relevant to the educational objectives of the program;
( iii ) There is evidence of educationally focused practicum or other field experiences in settings that assure student involvement in the provision of vocational rehabilitation or independent living rehabilitation services to individuals with disabilities, especially individuals with significant disabilities; and
( iv ) The didactic coursework includes student exposure to vocational rehabilitation processes, concepts, programs, and services.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 302 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 772)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 651

 782

 778

 811

 787

 823

 769

 768

 768

 799

 800

 613

 544

 516

 470

 475

 490

 482

 483

 508

 510

 515

 525

 523

 563

 602

 622

 769

 802

 796

 784

 549

 571

 551

 577

 595

 603

 612

 613

 571

 544

 519

 449

 427

 422

 422

 438

 460

 465

 459

 457

 491

 506

 515

 519

 519

 566

 602

 612

 779

 784

 749

 607

 639

 634

 653

 685

 717

 705

 696

 659

 644

 619

 507

 471

 474

 445

 457

 472

 475

 473

 474

 502

 512

 521

 520

 538

 590

 608

 657

 796

 790

 769

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 6, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 391

 411

 408

 420

 439

 459

 452

 446

 423

 414

 399

 329

 307

 309

 291

 298

 308

 310

 308

 309

 326

 332

 338

 337

 348

 381

 392

 422

 508

 504

 491

TOTAL 18,309

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                          870,144
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   7,410,826
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                8,282,072
<PP&E>                          875,816
<DEPRECIATION>                  485,256
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  188,941,984
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           22,959,600
<BONDS>                         1,244,855
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        99,059
<OTHER-SE>                      164,638,472
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    188,941,984
<SALES>                         38,873,984
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                38,873,984
<CGS>                           14,674,217
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   14,674,217
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                5,102,540
<LOSS-PROVISION>                675,014
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              236,701
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 29,718,286
<INCOME-TAX>                    3,113,341
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             28,236,292
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    28,236,292
<EPS-BASIC>                   .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .37



</TABLE>
#### Strobridge Lithographic Company, Respondent, v. William A. Brady and Another, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 477

 495

 509

 546

 524

 521

 540

 534

 551

 526

 519

 456

 432

 467

 521

 526

 567

 546

 526

 555

 565

 594

 580

 554

 514

 520

 485

 461

 471

 549

 586

 358

 363

 364

 367

 365

 362

 362

 362

 356

 348

 350

 356

 340

 328

 311

 301

 289

 290

 289

 214

 286

 287

 292

 301

 301

 303

 307

 315

 314

 296

 296

 393

 393

 388

 407

 398

 394

 399

 402

 392

 396

 401

 385

 373

 363

 363

 352

 346

 331

 327

 341

 349

 352

 354

 358

 361

 363

 366

 374

 363

 362

 359

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 12, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 259

 259

 256

 268

 262

 259

 263

 264

 258

 261

 264

 254

 247

 240

 240

 234

 230

 221

 218

 227

 232

 234

 235

 237

 239

 240

 242

 247

 240

 240

 238

TOTAL 11,505

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
### §3114. Return of seized property and suppression of evidence; motion—(Rule)

#### See Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

Return of property and suppression of evidence upon motion, Rule 41(e).

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 820.)
Filed by EBS Inc. (403) 275-3442








CROSSHAIR EXPLORATION & MINING CORP.

Suite 1240, 1140 West Pender Street

Vancouver, B.C.  V6E 4G1




August 14, 2007

J. Wayne Pickett

37 Wintergreen Road

Conception Bay South, NL  A1W 4V5

Dear Wayne:

Re:

Employment with Crosshair Exploration & Mining Corp. (the “Company”)

The Company is pleased to congratulate you on your promotion to Vice President Exploration effective August 14, 2007.

In recognition of your new position, the Company will immediately pay to you a bonus in the amount of C$20,000, less statutory deductions, being the bonus contemplated under the Executive Employment Agreement dated October 1, 2006 (the “Original Agreement”) between the Company and yourself.

Going forward, the Company will pay to you a bonus of up to C$50,000 per year, less statutory deductions, to be paid quarterly, based on the Company’s fiscal periods.  The amount of this bonus shall be determined by the Company’s Compensation Committee based on its assessment of the Company’s financial circumstances and your performance, having regard to such factors as the success of the Company’s exploration programs, your performance in your role as manager of the Company’s St. John’s, NL office, the quality and punctuality of your reporting to the CEO and Board of Directors, peer group compensation comparisons and any other criteria the Compensation Committee deems relevant.

The Company will also immediately grant to you options to purchase up to 100,000 common shares in the capital of the Company at an exercise price of $1.54.  These options will be subject to vesting over a two year period and will expire on August 14, 2012.

All other terms and provisions of the Original Agreement remain in full force and effect.

If the foregoing meets with your approval, kindly sign and return the enclosed copy of this letter.

Yours very truly,

CROSSHAIR EXPLORATION & MINING CORP.




/s/ Mark J. Morabito




Mark J. Morabito

President and CEO

/jlb

Agreed to and accepted this ____ day of August, 2007.







/s/ J. Wayne Pickett




J. Wayne Pickett
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2 0 2 3

- 2550

_____________________________
H OMEOWNERS C HOICE P ROPERTY & C ASUALTY I NSURANCE C OMPANY , I NC

. ,
Petitioner
,

v.

T IMOTHY B. L ACEY and K AY L. L ACEY , Respondent s

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

— Original Jurisdiction

.

December 28, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

.
L EWIS , R OBERTS , and T ANENBAUM , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Patrick M. Chidnese and Frieda C. Lindroth of Bickford & Chidnese, LLP, Tampa
, for Petitioner

. Blair Fazzio of Kanner & Pintaluga, P.A., Boca Raton
, for Respondent s

.
### §1657. Corruption of seamen and confederating with pirates

Whoever attempts to corrupt any commander, master, officer, or mariner to yield up or to run away with any vessel, or any goods, wares, or merchandise, or to turn pirate or to go over to or confederate with pirates, or in any wise to trade with any pirate, knowing him to be such; or

Whoever furnishes such pirate with any ammunition, stores, or provisions of any kind; or

Whoever fits out any vessel knowingly and, with a design to trade with, supply, or correspond with any pirate or robber upon the seas; or

Whoever consults, combines, confederates, or corresponds with any pirate or robber upon the seas, knowing him to be guilty of any piracy or robbery; or

Whoever, being a seaman, confines the master of any vessel—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 775; Pub. L. 101–647, title XXV, §2527(b), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4877; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §498 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §307, 35 Stat. 1148).

Mandatory punishment provisions were rephrased in the alternative.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000" in last par.

1990—Pub. L. 101–647, which directed insertion of "section 11, 12, or 13 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act" after "consideration of any action brought under", could not be executed because the words "consideration of any action brought under" did not appear.
§ 300.516 Civil action. ( a ) *General.* Any party aggrieved by the findings and decision made under §§ 300.507 through 300.513 or §§ 300.530 through 300.534 who does not have the right to an appeal under § 300.514(b), and any party aggrieved by the findings and decision under § 300.514(b), has the right to bring a civil action with respect to the due process complaint notice requesting a due process hearing under § 300.507 or §§ 300.530 through 300.532. The action may be brought in any State court of competent jurisdiction or in a district court of the United States without regard to the amount in controversy.
( b ) *Time limitation.* The party bringing the action shall have 90 days from the date of the decision of the hearing officer or, if applicable, the decision of the State review official, to file a civil action, or, if the State has an explicit time limitation for bringing civil actions under Part B of the Act, in the time allowed by that State law.
( c ) *Additional requirements.* In any action brought under paragraph (a) of this section, the court— ( 1 ) Receives the records of the administrative proceedings;
( 2 ) Hears additional evidence at the request of a party; and
( 3 ) Basing its decision on the preponderance of the evidence, grants the relief that the court determines to be appropriate.
( d ) *Jurisdiction of district courts.* The district courts of the United States have jurisdiction of actions brought under section 615 of the Act without regard to the amount in controversy.
( e ) *Rule of construction.* Nothing in this part restricts or limits the rights, procedures, and remedies available under the Constitution, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, or other Federal laws protecting the rights of children with disabilities, except that before the filing of a civil action under these laws seeking relief that is also available under section 615 of the Act, the procedures under §§ 300.507 and 300.514 must be exhausted to the same extent as would be required had the action been brought under section 615 of the Act.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1415(i)(2) and (3)(A), 1415(l))
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clancy Systems International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  September 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
 hereof  (the "Report"), I, Stanley J. Wolfson, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

/s/   Stanley J. Wolfson
Chief Executive Officer
March 13, 2006



<PAGE>
§ 303.603 Use of funds by the Council. ( a ) Subject to the approval by the Governor, the Council may use funds under this part to— ( 1 ) Conduct hearings and forums;
( 2 ) Reimburse members of the Council for reasonable and necessary expenses for attending Council meetings and performing Council duties (including child care for parent representatives);
( 3 ) Pay compensation to a member of the Council if the member is not employed or must forfeit wages from other employment when performing official Council business;
( 4 ) Hire staff; and
( 5 ) Obtain the services of professional, technical, and clerical personnel as may be necessary to carry out the performance of its functions under part C of the Act.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, Council members must serve without compensation from funds available under part C of the Act.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1441(d))
§ 470.113 National Highway System procedures. ( a ) Proposals for system actions on the National Highway System shall include a route description, a statement of justification, and statements of coordination with adjoining States on State-line connections, with responsible local officials, and with officials of areas under Federal jurisdiction.
( b ) Proposed modifications to the National Highway System shall enhance the national transportation characteristics of the National Highway System and shall follow the criteria listed in § 470.107. Proposals shall also consider the criteria contained in appendix D of this subpart.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 642

 690

 662

 586

 610

 621

 606

 523

 569

 579

 567

 570

 601

 549

 548

 503

 608

 641

 666

 641

 521

 576

 588

 630

 659

 659

 688

 689

 690

 597

 0

 463

 437

 410

 379

 393

 428

 398

 406

 440

 419

 483

 412

 361

 354

 364

 328

 358

 387

 423

 339

 353

 390

 390

 294

 458

 457

 454

 450

 449

 411

 0

 549

 558

 533

 491

 499

 510

 497

 465

 503

 505

 525

 500

 453

 444

 442

 405

 469

 471

 508

 457

 434

 464

 462

 467

 533

 519

 516

 508

 513

 490

 0

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:February 2, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 355

 361

 345

 319

 324

 331

 323

 303

 327

 328

 340

 325

 296

 290

 289

 266

 306

 307

 330

 298

 284

 303

 302

 305

 345

 337

 335

 330

 333

 319

 0

TOTAL 14,690

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS