alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 782

 931

 931

 837

 845

 875

 838

 826

 814

 795

 827

 849

 887

 859

 846

 764

 763

 833

 874

 955

 954

 911

 944

 917

 917

 921

 932

 895

 971

 970

 1,021

 771

 768

 806

 804

 834

 842

 802

 795

 786

 765

 760

 776

 805

 795

 703

 691

 692

 694

 793

 878

 838

 832

 795

 812

 812

 827

 901

 841

 832

 918

 948

 778

 805

 849

 819

 840

 860

 822

 807

 804

 780

 781

 810

 862

 833

 763

 721

 723

 748

 830

 907

 883

 876

 867

 884

 850

 867

 914

 866

 937

 934

 976

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 6, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 497

 513

 541

 522

 535

 547

 524

 515

 513

 498

 499

 517

 549

 531

 488

 462

 463

 478

 529

 577

 562

 557

 552

 562

 541

 552

 581

 551

 595

 593

 619

TOTAL 25,996

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
§ 251.4 Departure manifests and lists for aircraft. ( a ) *United States Customs Service Form 7507 or International Civil Aviation Organization's General Declaration.* The captain or agent of every aircraft departing from the United States for a foreign place or an outlying possession of the United States, except on a flight departing for and terminating in Canada, shall submit to the immigration officer at the port from which such aircraft is to depart a completed United States Customs Service Form 7507 or the International Civil Aviation Organization's General Declaration. The form shall contain a list of all alien crewmen on board, including alien crewmen who arrived in the United States as crewmen on an aircraft of the same line and who are departing as passengers. The surname, given name, and middle initial of each such alien crewman listed shall be shown. In addition, the captain or agent of the aircraft shall indicate the total number of alien crewmembers and the total number of United States citizen crewmembers.
( b ) *Notification of changes in employment for aircraft.* The agent of the air transportation line shall immediately notify in writing the nearest immigration office of the termination of employment in the United States of each alien employee of the line furnishing the name, birth date, birthplace, nationality, passport number, and other available information concerning such alien. The procedure to follow in obtaining permission to pay off or discharge an alien crewman in the United States after initial immigration inspection, other than an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence, is set forth in § 252.1(f) of this chapter.
[62 FR 10387, Mar. 6, 1997]
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7332]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Postponement of Public Hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact 
Statement for the Mountaineer Commercial Scale Carbon Capture and 
Storage Project, Mason County, WV

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy.

ACTION: Postponement of public hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTICE: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced the availability 
of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Mountaineer 
Commercial Scale Carbon Capture and Storage Project (DOE/EIS-0445D) for 
public review and comment in a Federal Register notice on Friday, March 
11, 2011. The notice also provided the location and time for a public 
hearing for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, scheduled for 
Wednesday, March 30, 2011. The purpose of this notice is to inform 
interested parties that DOE has decided to postpone the public hearing; 
DOE will issue another notice announcing the new date and time for this 
meeting.

    Issued in Washington, DC on March 23, 2011.
Mark J. Matarrese,
Director, Office of Environment, Security, Safety & Health, Office of 
Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 2011-7332 Filed 3-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
§ 463.500 What is the Memorandum of Understanding for the one-stop delivery system and what must be included in the Memorandum of Understanding? ( a ) The MOU is the product of local discussion and negotiation, and is an agreement developed and executed between the Local WDB and the one-stop partners, with the agreement of the chief elected official and the one-stop partners, relating to the operation of the one-stop delivery system in the local area. Two or more local areas in a region may develop a single joint MOU, if they are in a region that has submitted a regional plan under sec. 106 of WIOA.
( b ) The MOU must include: ( 1 ) A description of services to be provided through the one-stop delivery system, including the manner in which the services will be coordinated and delivered through the system;
( 2 ) Agreement on funding the costs of the services and the operating costs of the system, including: ( i ) Funding of infrastructure costs of one-stop centers in accordance with §§ 463.700 through 463.755; and
( ii ) Funding of the shared services and operating costs of the one-stop delivery system described in § 463.760;
( 3 ) Methods for referring individuals between the one-stop operators and partners for appropriate services and activities;
( 4 ) Methods to ensure that the needs of workers, youth, and individuals with barriers to employment, including individuals with disabilities, are addressed in providing access to services, including access to technology and materials that are available through the one-stop delivery system;
( 5 ) The duration of the MOU and procedures for amending it; and
( 6 ) Assurances that each MOU will be reviewed, and if substantial changes have occurred, renewed, not less than once every 3-year period to ensure appropriate funding and delivery of services.
( c ) The MOU may contain any other provisions agreed to by the parties that are consistent with WIOA title I, the authorizing statutes and regulations of one-stop partner programs, and the WIOA regulations.
( d ) When fully executed, the MOU must contain the signatures of the Local WDB, one-stop partners, the chief elected official(s), and the time period in which the agreement is effective. The MOU must be updated not less than every 3 years to reflect any changes in the signatory official of the Board, one-stop partners, and chief elected officials, or one-stop infrastructure funding.
( e ) If a one-stop partner appeal to the State regarding infrastructure costs, using the process described in § 463.750, results in a change to the one-stop partner's infrastructure cost contributions, the MOU must be updated to reflect the final one-stop partner infrastructure cost contributions.
Case 18-13714-KHK Doc 20 Filed 11/14/18 Entered 11/14/18 14:54:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 8
Case 18-13714-KHK Doc 20 Filed 11/14/18 Entered 11/14/18 14:54:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 8
Case 18-13714-KHK Doc 20 Filed 11/14/18 Entered 11/14/18 14:54:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 8
Case 18-13714-KHK Doc 20 Filed 11/14/18 Entered 11/14/18 14:54:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 8
Case 18-13714-KHK Doc 20 Filed 11/14/18 Entered 11/14/18 14:54:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 8
Case 18-13714-KHK Doc 20 Filed 11/14/18 Entered 11/14/18 14:54:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 8
Case 18-13714-KHK Doc 20 Filed 11/14/18 Entered 11/14/18 14:54:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 8
Case 18-13714-KHK Doc 20 Filed 11/14/18 Entered 11/14/18 14:54:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 8
§ 463.610 When is the sole-source selection of one-stop operators appropriate, and how is it conducted? ( a ) States may select a one-stop operator through sole source selection when allowed under the same policies and procedures used for competitive procurement with non-Federal funds, while other non-Federal entities including subrecipients of a State (such as local areas) may select a one-stop operator through sole selection when consistent with local procurement policies and procedures and the Uniform Guidance set out at 2 CFR 200.320.
( b ) In the event that sole source procurement is determined necessary and reasonable, in accordance with § 463.605(c), written documentation must be prepared and maintained concerning the entire process of making such a selection.
( c ) Such sole source procurement must include appropriate conflict of interest policies and procedures. These policies and procedures must conform to the specifications in 20 CFR 679.430 for demonstrating internal controls and preventing conflict of interest.
( d ) A Local WDB may be selected as a one-stop operator through sole source procurement only with agreement of the chief elected official in the local area and the Governor. The Local WDB must establish sufficient conflict of interest policies and procedures and these policies and procedures must be approved by the Governor.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 529

 647

 523

 468

 424

 414

 438

 472

 466

 500

 456

 409

 398

 421

 448

 539

 538

 513

 542

 484

 464

 504

 472

 466

 482

 463

 458

 480

 524

 587

 557

 334

 366

 357

 350

 339

 334

 336

 336

 344

 359

 351

 355

 343

 325

 326

 311

 310

 319

 344

 358

 359

 370

 366

 385

 356

 371

 394

 417

 422

 420

 430

 398

 426

 399

 392

 369

 367

 381

 390

 391

 393

 386

 379

 363

 354

 363

 378

 372

 371

 405

 401

 398

 410

 410

 414

 418

 414

 426

 439

 452

 457

 459

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 1, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 262

 279

 263

 258

 244

 243

 251

 257

 258

 259

 255

 250

 240

 235

 240

 250

 246

 245

 266

 264

 262

 269

 269

 272

 274

 272

 279

 287

 295

 298

 300

TOTAL 12,375

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
§ 303.724 Annual report of children served—other responsibilities of the lead agency. In addition to meeting the requirements of §§ 303.721 through 303.723, the lead agency must conduct its own child count or use EIS providers to complete its child count. If the lead agency uses EIS providers to complete its child count, then the lead agency must— ( a ) Establish procedures to be used by EIS providers in counting the number of children with disabilities receiving early intervention services;
( b ) Establish dates by which those EIS providers must report to the lead agency to ensure that the State complies with § 303.721(a);
( c ) Obtain certification from each EIS provider that an unduplicated and accurate count has been made;
( d ) Aggregate the data from the count obtained from each EIS provider and prepare the report required under §§ 303.721 through 303.723; and
( e ) Ensure that documentation is maintained to enable the State and the Secretary to audit the accuracy of the count.
(Approved by Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0557) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1418(a), 1435(a)(14), 1442)
#### § 668.17 [Reserved]
(CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.)

#### *The*United States *v.*Coolidge, *et. al.*

*Quiere,*whether .the courts of the United States hare jurisdiction oí «Fences at common law against the United States *!*

This was an indictment in the circuit court for the district of Massachusetts, against the defendants, for forcibly rescuing a prize, which had been captured and taken possession of by two American privateers. The captured vessel was on her way, under the direction of a prize master and crew, to the port of Salem for adjudication. The indictment laid the of-fence as committed upon the high seas. The ques-, tion made was, whether the circuit court has jurisdiction over common law oifences against the United States ? on which the judges of that court were divided in opinion.

The *Attorney-General*stated that he had given to this case an anjdous attention:

as much so, he hoped, as his public duty, under whatever view of it, rendered necessary. That he had al,so examined the opinion of the court, delivered at February term, 1813, in the case of the United States v. Hudson and Goodwin. That considering the point as decided in that case, whether with, or without, argument, on the part of those who had preceded him as the rfcua' *416sentative of the government in this court, he desired respectfully to state, without saying more, that it was not his intention to argue it now.,

, Story, J., I do not .take the question to be settled by. that case.

Johnson,. J. I consider it to be settled by the authority of that ca>.

' Washington, J. Whenever counsel can be found ready to argue it, I shall devest myself of all prejudice arising from that case.

. Livingston, J. I am disposed to hear an argument o.'. the point. This case-was brought up for that purpose, but until the question is re-argued, the case of the United States v. Hudson and Goodwin must be taken as law.

Johnson, J.

delivered the opinion, ol the court.

Upon the question now before the court a difference of opinion has existed, and still exists, among the members of the court. We should, therefore, have been willing to have heard the question discussed upon solemn argument. But the attorney-general has declined to argue,,the cause; and no counsel appears for the defendant. Under these circumstances the court would not choose to review their former decision in the case of the United States v. Hudson and Goodwin, or draw it into doubt. They *417will, therefore, certify an opinion to the circuit court in conformity with that decision. *J .*

Certificate for the.defendant.a

a

**Vide, 1 Gallison, 488, for the learned and elaborate opinion of Mr. J. Story, in the circuit court, in this case, tending to show that all offences within the admiralty jurisdiction are cognizable by the circuit court, and in the absence. of positive law, are punishable by 'fine and imprisonment. •
#### George Herbert Smith, Appellant, v. Sun Printing and Publishing Association, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
### §3292. Suspension of limitations to permit United States to obtain foreign evidence

(a)(1) Upon application of the United States, filed before return of an indictment, indicating that evidence of an offense is in a foreign country, the district court before which a grand jury is impaneled to investigate the offense shall suspend the running of the statute of limitations for the offense if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that an official request has been made for such evidence and that it reasonably appears, or reasonably appeared at the time the request was made, that such evidence is, or was, in such foreign country.

(2) The court shall rule upon such application not later than thirty days after the filing of the application.

(b) Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section, a period of suspension under this section shall begin on the date on which the official request is made and end on the date on which the foreign court or authority takes final action on the request.

(c) The total of all periods of suspension under this section with respect to an offense—

(1) shall not exceed three years; and

(2) shall not extend a period within which a criminal case must be initiated for more than six months if all foreign authorities take final action before such period would expire without regard to this section.

(d) As used in this section, the term "official request" means a letter rogatory, a request under a treaty or convention, or any other request for evidence made by a court of the United States or an authority of the United States having criminal law enforcement responsibility, to a court or other authority of a foreign country.

(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §1218(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2167.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 30 days after Oct. 12, 1984, see section 1220 of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as a note under section 3505 of this title.
# Official Journal L 275/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.275.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 275 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5510 October 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.275.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 275

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5510 October 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 924/2012 of 4 October 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 925/2012 of 8 October 2012 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pimiento de Fresno-Benavente (PGI)) | 23 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 926/2012 of 9 October 2012 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 25 |
| | | DIRECTIVES |
| | * | Commission Implementing Directive 2012/25/EU of 9 October 2012 laying down information procedures for the exchange, between Member States, of human organs intended for transplantation (1) | 27 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 924/2012 of 4 October 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 925/2012 of 8 October 2012 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pimiento de Fresno-Benavente (PGI))

23

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 926/2012 of 9 October 2012 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

25

DIRECTIVES

*

Commission Implementing Directive 2012/25/EU of 9 October 2012 laying down information procedures for the exchange, between Member States, of human organs intended for transplantation (1)

27

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT VIC TOR ALEXANDER

LOPEZM AR TINEZ, AKA Vic tor A. Lope z , AKA Vic tor Ale xa

nde r Lope z , AKA Lope z He rnande z , AKA Jua

n Jose Lope z M artine z , AKA M a

y nor M artine z -R opa lo, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 14-72464 Age n c y No. A205-319-067 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d April 26, 2016 ** B e fore : M c KEOW

N , WA RDLAW , a

nd PAEZ, C i rc u it Judge s. Vic tor Ale xa

n d e r Lope z -M artine z , a

native and c itiz e n of Hondura s, pe titions for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ orde r dism issing his



# FIL ED M AY03 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).a

ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de c ision finding him re m o v a ble and sta

tutorily ine l igible for c an c e lla

tion of re m ova l. W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie wde novo que stions of la w. C oronado v . Holde r , 759 F.3d 977, 982 (9th C ir. 2014). W e de ny

the pe tition for re vie w. The a ge n c y

c o rre c tly c onc lude d tha

t Lope z -M artine z wa s ine ligible for c anc e lla tion of re m ova l b a se d on his c onvic tion for a c rim e of dom e s tic viole nc e unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1227(a )(2)(E)(i), whe re the re c ord e s ta blishe d tha

t he ha d be e n c onvic te d unde r C a lifornia Pe na l C ode § 273.5. Se e 8 U.S.C . § 1229b(b)(1)(C ) (spe c ify i ng c la s se s of c rim ina l c onvic tions tha t pre c lude a

gran t of c a

n c e l lation of re m ova l); C

arrillo v . Holde r , 781 F.3d 1155, 1159 (9th C ir. 2015) (“ [C a lifornia Pe na l C ode ] § 273.5 is c at e goric a lly a c rim e of dom e stic viole nc e within the m e aning of 8 U.S.C . § 1227(a)(2)(E)(i)” ); 8 C . F.R . § 1003.41(d) (in addition to the c onvic tion doc um e n t s e num e rate d in there gula t ion, “ [a ] ny

othe r e vide n c e that re a s ona bly indic ate s the e x iste n c e of a c rim i na l c o nvic tion m ay

be a dm issiblea s e vide nc e the re of” ). Lope z -M artine z ’ s c onte ntion tha t the c onvic tion doc um e nts a dm itte d a s e v ide n c e did not e sta

blish his re lationship to the vic tim is without m e rit be c a

use his c onvic tion is c ate goric a lly a c rim e of dom e stic viole nc e . Se e C arrillo , 781 F.3d a

t 1159.

1 4 - 7 2 4 6 4

2In light of our disposition, we do not re a c h Lope z -M a

rtine z ’ s c onte ntion re ga rding the burde n of proof whe re the re c ord of c onvic tion is inc onc lusive . PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 4 - 7 2 4 6 4 3