alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MILES CITY FIELD OFFICE

Supplemental Air Quality Analysis

APPENDIX B

DATA SET-UP
Supplemental Air Quality Analysis

B-1

Appendix B CALMET User-Defined Fields

Variable Description Value

PMAP Map projection LCC(Lambert Conformal)

False Easting = 0.0

False Northing = 0.0

DATUM = WGS-84

Reference Lat/Long:

RLAT0 = 44.75 N

RLON0 = 107.00 W

Standard Parallels:

XLAT1 = 30.0 N

XLAT2 = 60.0 N

NX, NY No. X grid cells, No. Y grid cells 210, 180

DGRIDKM Grid spacing (km) 4.0

XORIGKM SOUTHWEST corner of grid cell (1,1) (km) -420.0

YORIGKM SOUTHWEST corner of grid cell (1,1) (km) -360.0

NZ Number of vertical layers 12

ZFACE Vertical cell face heights (m) 0, 20, 40, 80, 120, 180, 

260, 400, 600, 800, 1200, 2000, 

3000

IEXTRP Extrapolation of surface winds to upper layers -4

RMAX1 Max surface over-land extrapolation radius (km) 20

RMAX2 Max aloft over-land extrapolation radius (km) 50

RMAX3 Maximum over-water extrapolation radius (km) 500 

TERRAD Radius of influence of terrain features (km) 10

R1 Relative weight at surface of Step 1 field and obs 10

R2 Relative weight aloft of Step 1 field and obs 25

ISURFT Surface Station to use for surface temperature Riverton Mun. Arpt, WY

IUPT Station for lapse rates Riverton, WY

IPROG Gridded prognostic wind field – MM4/MM5 data 14
Supplemental Air Quality Analysis

B-2

CALPUFF User-Defined Fields

Variable Description Value

NSPEC Number of chemical species 9

NSE Number of chemical species to be emitted 7

CSPECn Names of Species SO2, SO4, NOX,

HNO3, NO3, PM10, PM2.5, EC, SOA

MCHEM Chemical mechanism flag 1

MDISP Method used to compute dispersion coefficients 3

PMAP Map projection same as CALMET

NX, NY No. X grid cells, No. Y grid cells 210, 180

DGRIDKM Grid spacing (km) 4.0

XORIGKM SOUTHWEST corner of grid cell (1,1) (km) -420.0

YORIGKM SOUTHWEST corner of grid cell (1,1) (km) -360.0

NZ Number of vertical layers 12

ZFACE Vertical cell face heights (m) 0, 20, 40, 80, 120, 180, 

260, 400, 600, 800, 1200, 2000, 

3000

IBCOMP Southwest X-index of computational domain 1

JBCOMP Southwest J-index of computational domain 1

IECOMP Northeast X-index of computational domain 210

JECOMP Northeast Y-index of computational domain 180

Dry Gas Dep Chemical parameters of gaseous deposition CALPUFF default

Dry Part. Dep Chemical parameters of particle deposition CALPUFF default

Wet Dep Wet deposition parameters CALPUFF default

MOZ Ozone data input option 1

BCKO3 Monthly ozone concentrations (Used only 

if MCHEM = 1, 3, or 4 and MOZ = 0 or

MOZ = 1 and all hourly O3 data missing) (ppb) 12*40.0

BCKNH3 Monthly ammonia concentrations (ppb) 12*5.0
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 510 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 

railroad track maintenance credit, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 11, 2019 

Mr. BLUMENAUER (for himself and Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently 

extend the railroad track maintenance credit, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Building Rail Access 

5 for Customers and the Economy Act of 2019’’ or the 

6 ‘‘BRACE Act of 2019’’. 

7 SEC. 2. RAILROAD TRACK MAINTENANCE CREDIT MADE 

8 PERMANENT. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 45G of the Internal Rev10 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subsection (f). 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 510 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

2 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by 

3 subsection (a) shall apply to expenditures paid or in4 curred during taxable years beginning after Decem5 ber 31, 2017. 

6 (2) SAFE HARBOR ASSIGNMENTS.—Assign7 ments, including related expenditures paid or in8 curred, referred to in section 45G(b)(2) of the Inter9 nal Revenue Code of 1986 for taxable years ending 

10 after December 31, 2017, shall not fail to be treated 

11 as timely made if made pursuant to a written agree12 ment entered into not later than 90 days after the 

13 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 451

 466

 453

 424

 444

 453

 438

 317

 320

 331

 328

 332

 339

 346

 356

 344

 343

 340

 337

 330

 325

 324

 312

 300

 308

 297

 297

 294

 303

 289

 265

 204

 207

 209

 213

 215

 230

 247

 225

 226

 228

 230

 237

 238

 242

 247

 246

 246

 240

 248

 260

 243

 249

 244

 241

 241

 239

 247

 253

 261

 238

 226

 307

 324

 324

 313

 321

 342

 337

 280

 278

 282

 282

 287

 289

 293

 302

 300

 298

 295

 292

 292

 289

 291

 286

 278

 279

 270

 270

 274

 285

 261

 248

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 22, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 206

 216

 216

 209

 214

 227

 224

 189

 188

 190

 190

 193

 195

 197

 203

 201

 200

 198

 196

 196

 195

 196

 193

 188

 188

 183

 183

 185

 192

 177

 169

TOTAL 9,069

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
No. 22

The People &c.,

Respondent,

v.

Howard Powell,

Appellant.

Kendra L. Hutchinson, for appellant.

Danielle M. O'Boyle, for respondent.

Reargument ordered for a future Court session. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera,

Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Wilson concur.

Decided April 1, 2021
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENT FOR NONCOMPLIANCE

WITH THE TEXAS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE

Cause Number: 01-17-00828-CR & 01-17-00829-CR

Style: Alfredo Campos v. State of Texas

Type of document: Appellant’s Brief

Date document filed: October 16, 2018

Document filed by: Appellant

The briefs of appellant, Alfredo Campos, do not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure 9.10(a)(3), (b). Accordingly, appellant’s brief is struck. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.9(a). 

Appellant is granted 10 days from the date of this order to file a corrected brief complying with 

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.10(a)(3). See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(d) (“Sensitive data 

must be redacted by using the letter “X” in place of each omitted digit or character or by removing 

the sensitive data in a manner indicated that the data has been redacted.”). Appellee, the State of 

Texas, may file an amended appellee’s brief within 10 days of the filing of appellant’s corrected 

brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b). Appellee’s motion to seal appellant’s brief is denied as moot.

Judge’s signature: __/s/ Sherry Radack___

 Acting individually Acting for the Court 

Panel consists of __________________________________________

Date:____November 13, 2018___________
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 622

 548

 532

 538

 563

 572

 580

 577

 563

 569

 574

 548

 637

 550

 500

 349

 365

 393

 415

 359

 369

 408

 343

 398

 401

 419

 453

 446

 384

 375

 336

 313

 280

 322

 282

 296

 314

 286

 305

 287

 281

 298

 284

 282

 289

 277

 282

 281

 277

 260

 263

 275

 269

 277

 276

 271

 279

 289

 278

 279

 463

 410

 381

 409

 381

 372

 393

 362

 366

 362

 358

 357

 378

 364

 333

 305

 309

 323

 325

 299

 292

 309

 303

 308

 321

 317

 325

 334

 321

 323

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:July 18, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 302

 269

 251

 269

 251

 246

 259

 240

 242

 240

 237

 237

 250

 241

 222

 204

 207

 216

 217

 201

 196

 207

 203

 206

 214

 212

 217

 222

 214

 216

TOTAL 10,403

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
### §3273. Offenses committed by certain United States personnel stationed in Canada in furtherance of border security initiatives

(a) In General.—Whoever, while employed by the Department of Homeland Security or the Department of Justice and stationed or deployed in Canada pursuant to a treaty, executive agreement, or bilateral memorandum in furtherance of a border security initiative, engages in conduct (or conspires or attempts to engage in conduct) in Canada that would constitute an offense for which a person may be prosecuted in a court of the United States had the conduct been engaged in within the United States or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States shall be fined or imprisoned, or both, as provided for that offense.

(b) Definition.—In this section, the term "employed by the Department of Homeland Security or the Department of Justice" means—

(1) being employed as a civilian employee, a contractor (including a subcontractor at any tier), or an employee of a contractor (or a subcontractor at any tier) of the Department of Homeland Security or the Department of Justice;

(2) being present or residing in Canada in connection with such employment; and

(3) not being a national of or ordinarily resident in Canada.

(Added Pub. L. 114–316, §2(a)(2), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1593.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Rule of Construction

Pub. L. 114–316, §2(c), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1594, provided that: "Nothing in this section [enacting this section] or the amendments made by this section shall be construed to infringe upon or otherwise affect the exercise of prosecutorial discretion by the Department of Justice in implementing this section and the amendments made by this section."
§ 637.3 What regulations apply to the Minority Science and Engineering Improvement Program? The following regulations apply to the Minority Science and Engineering Improvement Program: ( a ) The Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) as follows: ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) 34 CFR part 75 (Direct Grant Programs).
( 3 ) 34 CFR part 77 (Definitions that Apply to Department Regulations).
( 4 ) 34 CFR part 79 (Intergovernmental Review of Department of Education Programs and Activities).
( 5 ) 34 CFR part 82 (New Restrictions on Lobbying).
( 6 ) [Reserved]
( 7 ) 34 CFR part 86 (Drug-Free Schools and Campuses).
( b ) The regulations in this part 637.
( c ) (1) 2 CFR part 180 (OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement)), as adopted at 2 CFR part 3485; and ( 2 ) 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards), as adopted at 2 CFR part 3474.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1067-1067c, 1067g-1067k, 1068, and 1068b, unless otherwise noted)
[46 FR 51204, Oct. 16, 1981, as amended at 52 FR 43544, Nov. 12, 1987; 57 FR 54302, Nov. 18, 1992; 65 FR 7675, Feb. 15, 2000; 79 FR 76102, Dec. 19, 2014]
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean TDS

1 641 638 639 411

2 640 638 639 411

3 639 577 620 399

4 638 594 626 403

5 636 628 633 407

6 635 626 630 405

7 633 629 631 406

8 636 622 633 407

9 636 627 632 407

10 635 629 633 407

11 637 628 633 407

12 634 630 632 407

13 639 631 634 408

14 639 635 637 410

15 642 635 638 410

16 644 638 641 412

17 640 636 639 411

18 640 634 637 410

19 640 638 639 411

20 640 636 638 410

21 642 638 640 412

22 645 640 642 413

23 648 643 645 415

24 648 634 647 416

25 648 626 643 413

26 645 640 643 413

27 644 631 640 412

28 642 636 640 412

29 646 611 641 412

30 650 646 648 416

Total 19113

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Check 20 

Period: April 2023 Run Date: 5/9/2023
### §692a. Hunting, pursuing, capturing, etc., in Ocala National Forest unlawful

When such game sanctuaries or refuges have been established as provided in section 692 of this title, the hunting, pursuing, poisoning, killing, or capturing by trapping, netting, or any other means, or attempting to hunt, pursue, kill, or capture any game animals or birds upon the lands of the United States within the limits of such game sanctuaries or refuges shall be unlawful except under such rules and regulations as the Secretary of Agriculture may from time to time prescribe.

(June 28, 1930, ch. 709, §2, 46 Stat. 828; June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §15, 62 Stat. 861.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1948—Act June 25, 1948, struck out penal provisions (see section 41 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure), and inserted reference to rules and regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1948 Amendment

Section 20 of act June 25, 1948, provided that the amendment made by that act is effective Sept. 1, 1948.
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual report of Sub Surface Waste Management of Delaware,
      Inc (the “registrant”) (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending
      September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bruce S. Beattie, Chief Executive Officer of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall
                material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations
                of the Company.








/S/
      Bruce S.
      Beattie


Bruce
      S.
      Beattie


Chief
      Executive Officer


January
      16, 2007
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 980

 981

 972

 1,043

 1,036

 1,029

 1,042

 1,046

 978

 1,055

 1,063

 1,096

 1,039

 1,034

 1,013

 967

 942

 939

 943

 895

 902

 946

 938

 944

 908

 958

 979

 950

 957

 939

 908

 361

 363

 364

 377

 372

 376

 370

 359

 361

 363

 368

 362

 362

 355

 361

 356

 363

 384

 371

 374

 384

 378

 375

 372

 359

 360

 358

 337

 341

 345

 354

 642

 596

 548

 621

 676

 638

 593

 618

 547

 649

 733

 667

 664

 671

 613

 625

 602

 704

 617

 618

 602

 629

 646

 650

 637

 574

 610

 564

 633

 609

 592

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 10, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 413

 384

 355

 400

 434

 410

 382

 398

 354

 417

 469

 428

 426

 431

 395

 402

 388

 451

 397

 398

 388

 405

 415

 418

 410

 371

 393

 365

 407

 392

 382

TOTAL 19,388

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walter HOWARD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-30372

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 21, 2006.

*327Josette Louise Cassiere, Asst. U.S. Atty., Shreveport, LA, for U.S.

Mary E. Winchell, The Malone Law Firm, Shreveport, LA, for Howard.

Before JOLLY, DAVIS and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Walter Howard appeals the 120-month sentence he received after pleading guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). He contends that the sentence is unreasonable. Specifically, Howard argues that he was incorrectly assessed an enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) and U.S.S.G. § 4B1.4 when the Government failed to give notice that it intended to seek such an enhanced sentence.

Howard cites no authority, Fifth Circuit or otherwise, supporting his contention that the notice he received was inadequate. He was not entitled to any formal notice of the possibility of an enhanced sentence under the ACCA other than that required by due process. *See*§ 924(e); § 4B1.4, comment.; *cf. United States v. O’Neal,*180 F.3d 115, 125-26 (4th Cir.1999) (stating that “[t]here is no requirement that the government list, either in the indictment or in some formal notice, the predicate convictions on which it will rely for a section 924(e) enhancement” but requiring notice sufficient to satisfy due-process concerns) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

Howard received adequate notice of the Government’s intent to seek an enhanced sentence under the ACCA through the PSR, to which he objected in writing and at sentencing. Howard’s argument that he received inadequate notice is therefore unavailing, and he has waived by failing to brief any argument otherwise challenging the correctness of the enhancement or the calculation of the guidelines.

Because the guidelines range was correctly calculated in the instant case, a sentence imposed within that range would have been presumptively reasonable. *United States v. Alonzo,*435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir.2006). That being so, Howard cannot be heard to complain that the 120-month sentence imposed, which was below the correctly calculated guidelines range and based on the district court’s specific statement that the sentence should not exceed the 10-year maximum it advised him of at rearraignment, was unreasonable.1
      *See id.; see also United States v.*
      *328
      *Hardin,*437 F.3d 463, 470-71 (5th Cir.2006). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

. The Government does not challenge the reasonableness of downward departure in Howard's favor.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self Employed Correspondence Exam Toll Free Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Monday, May 16, 2011 and Tuesday, May 17, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Timothy Shepard at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6095.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self Employed Correspondence Exam Toll Free Project Committee will be held Monday, May 16, 2011 from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and Tuesday, May 17, 2011 from 8 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. Pacific Time in Seattle, WA. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Notification of intent to participate must be made with Timothy Shepard. For more information and site location please contact Mr. Shepard at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6095, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or post comments to the web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: March 24, 2011.

Shawn Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2011-7536 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### § 270.32 What limitation is imposed on providing Equity Assistance under this program?

A recipient of a grant under this program may not use funds to assist in the development or implementation of activities or the development of curriculum materials for the direct instruction of students to improve their academic and vocational achievement levels.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 678

 660

 659

 664

 760

 745

 683

 681

 704

 708

 686

 730

 727

 721

 640

 672

 598

 586

 583

 580

 563

 494

 448

 472

 512

 553

 579

 606

 637

 667

 659

 602

 624

 593

 588

 654

 628

 620

 640

 642

 642

 626

 667

 689

 632

 615

 580

 547

 541

 545

 537

 493

 393

 408

 446

 457

 458

 427

 433

 422

 418

 412

 639

 643

 624

 626

 703

 668

 648

 659

 665

 675

 654

 704

 708

 688

 627

 634

 577

 566

 560

 557

 538

 450

 428

 459

 483

 512

 503

 512

 529

 547

 526

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 4, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 411

 413

 402

 403

 450

 429

 416

 423

 427

 433

 420

 451

 454

 441

 403

 408

 373

 366

 362

 360

 348

 294

 281

 300

 314

 332

 327

 332

 343

 354

 341

TOTAL 18,312

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20