alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 607.5 How does an institution apply to be designated an eligible institution? An institution shall apply to the Secretary to be designated an eligible institution under the Strengthening Institutions Program by submitting an application to the Secretary in the form, manner and time established by the Secretary. The application must contain— ( a ) The information necessary for the Secretary to determine whether the institution satisfies the requirements of §§ 607.2, 607.3(a) and 607.4(a);
( b ) Any waiver request under §§ 607.3(b) and 607.4(c); and
( c ) Information or explanations justifying any requested waiver.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1058 and 1067)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,680

 3,345

 3,180

 2,576

 2,445

 1,440

 1,365

 1,356

 1,235

 1,004

 1,210

 1,227

 1,526

 1,635

 1,278

 1,288

 1,777

 1,369

 1,439

 906

 586

 547

 759

 538

 912

 845

 1,662

 2,468

 2,929

 2,525

 2,334

 251

 263

 263

 269

 264

 253

 241

 204

 193

 167

 177

 189

 188

 190

 199

 205

 225

 208

 203

 184

 188

 196

 176

 171

 161

 176

 180

 216

 236

 221

 260

 1,014

 896

 920

 820

 751

 572

 533

 397

 319

 264

 269

 333

 375

 391

 374

 397

 481

 413

 396

 330

 286

 289

 248

 225

 224

 256

 388

 599

 727

 678

 697

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 12, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 11,796

 11,189

 10,760

 10,347

 10,091

 9,815

 9,720

 9,626

 9,539

 9,356

 9,224

 9,065

 8,502

 7,854

 7,214

 6,715

 6,276

 5,869

 5,514

 5,272

 5,025

 4,917

 4,846

 4,807

 4,762

 4,685

 4,698

 4,906

 5,259

 5,540

 5,756

 843

 799

 769

 739

 721

 701

 694

 688

 681

 668

 659

 648

 607

 561

 515

 480

 448

 419

 394

 377

 359

 351

 346

 343

 340

 335

 336

 350

 376

 396

 411

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §1628a. Exchange of information related to trade enforcement

#### (a) In general

Subject to subsections (c) and (d), if the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection suspects that merchandise is being imported into the United States in violation of section 1526 of this title or section 602, 1201(a)(2), or 1201(b)(1) of title 17 and determines that the examination or testing of the merchandise by a person described in subsection (b) would assist the Commissioner in determining if the merchandise is being imported in violation of that section, the Commissioner, to permit the person to conduct the examination and testing—

(1) shall provide to the person information that appears on the merchandise and its packaging and labels, including unredacted images of the merchandise and its packaging and labels; and

(2) may, subject to any applicable bonding requirements, provide to the person unredacted samples of the merchandise.

#### (b) Person described

A person described in this subsection is—

(1) in the case of merchandise suspected of being imported in violation of section 1526 of this title, the owner of the trademark suspected of being copied or simulated by the merchandise;

(2) in the case of merchandise suspected of being imported in violation of section 602 of title 17, the owner of the copyright suspected of being infringed by the merchandise;

(3) in the case of merchandise suspected of being primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under that title, and being imported in violation of section 1201(a)(2) of that title, the owner of a copyright in the work; and

(4) in the case of merchandise suspected of being primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing protection afforded by a technological measure that effectively protects a right of an owner of a copyright in a work or a portion of a work, and being imported in violation of section 1201(b)(1) of that title, the owner of the copyright.

#### (c) Limitation

Subsection (a) applies only with respect to merchandise suspected of infringing a trademark or copyright that is recorded with U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

#### (d) Exception

The Commissioner may not provide under subsection (a) information, photographs, or samples to a person described in subsection (b) if providing such information, photographs, or samples would compromise an ongoing law enforcement investigation or national security.

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §628A, as added Pub. L. 114–125, title III, §302(a), Feb. 24, 2016, 130 Stat. 149.)
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.1

         CONSENT OF REGISTERED INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

TO: Sub Surface Waste Management of Delaware, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-122913, 333-120375 and 333-112562 of Sub Surface Waste Management of
Delaware, Inc. on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement No. 333-117994 of Sub
Surface Waste Management of Delaware, Inc. on Form SB-2 of our report dated
December 29, 2005, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Sub Surface
Waste Management of Delaware, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2005.

                                  /s/ RUSSELL BEDFORD STEFANOU MIRCHANDANI LLP
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP

New York, New York
December 29, 2005

                                  /s/ RUSSELL BEDFORD STEFANOU MIRCHANDANI LLP
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP

New York, New York
December 29, 2005
§ 75.261 Extension of a project period. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70329 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) *General rule.* A grantee may extend the project period of an award one time for a period up to twelve months without the prior approval of the Secretary, if— ( 1 ) The grantee meets the requirements for extension in 2 CFR 200.308(d)(2); and
( 2 ) ED statutes, regulations other than those in 2 CFR part 200, or the conditions of an award do not prohibit the extension.
( b ) *Specific rule for certain programs of the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.* Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, grantees under the following programs of NIDRR must request prior approval to extend their grants under paragraph (c) of this section: ( 1 ) The Knowledge Dissemination and Utilization Centers and Disability and Technical Assistance Centers authorized under 29 U.S.C. 761a(b)(2), (4), (5), (6), and (11) and implemented at 34 CFR part 350, subpart B, §§ 350.17-350.19.
( 2 ) The Rehabilitation Research and Training Centers program authorized under 29 U.S.C. 762(b) and implemented at 34 CFR part 350, subpart C.
( 3 ) The Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers authorized under 29 U.S.C. 762(b)(3) and implemented at 34 CFR part 350, subpart D.
( 4 ) The Special Projects and Demonstrations for Spinal Cord Injuries authorized under 29 U.S.C. 762(b)(4) and implemented at 34 CFR part 359.
( c ) *Other regulations.* If ED regulations other than the regulations in 2 CFR part 200 or the conditions of the award require the grantee to obtain prior approval to extend the project period, the Secretary may permit the grantee to extend the project period if— ( 1 ) The extension does not violate any statute or regulations;
( 2 ) The extension does not involve the obligation of additional Federal funds;
( 3 ) The extension is to carry out the activities in the approved application; and
( 4 ) ( i ) The Secretary determines that, due to special or unusual circumstances applicable to a class of grantees, the project periods for the grantees should be extended; or
( ii ) ( A ) The Secretary determines that special or unusual circumstances would delay completion of the project beyond the end of the project period;
( B ) The grantee requests an extension of the project at least 45 calendar days before the end of the project period; and
( C ) The grantee provides a written statement before the end of the project period giving the reasons why the extension is appropriate under paragraph (c)(4)(ii)(A) of this section and the period for which the project needs extension.
( d ) *Waiver.* The Secretary may waive the requirement in paragraph (a)(4)(ii)(B) of this section if— ( 1 ) The grantee could not reasonably have known of the need for the extension on or before the start of the 45-day time period; or
( 2 ) The failure to give notice on or before the start of the 45-day time period was unavoidable.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
[57 FR 30338, July 8, 1992, as amended at 62 FR 40424, July 28, 1997; 79 FR 76092, Dec. 19, 2014]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

VINCENT YANT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 245 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of September, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
#### Catherine F. Brew, as Executrix of Mona B. Seidl, Deceased, Appellant, v. Henry Behrenhoff, Respondent.

No opinion. Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Close, P. J., and Lewis, J., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and to grant a new trial, with the following memorandum: This action is for the wrongful death of plaintiff’s testatrix resulting from injuries sustained when she was struck by defendant’s automobile while crossing Queens Boulevard near 41st Street, Queens County. In our opinion, the jury’s verdict in favor of defendant, insofar as it may be based on a finding that defendant was not negligent, is against the weight of the credible evidence. By defendant’s own testimony he was exceeding the speed limit. The skid marks 112 feet in length made by defendant’s car on the highway and the fact that the impact of the front headlight, the only portion of the front of the car that came in contact with the body of plaintiff’s testatrix, was so forceful that it lifted her body clear of the front of the car and cast it upon the hood, establish beyond a doubt that he was traveling at an excessive and dangerous rate of speed. The jury’s verdict, insofar as it may be básed on a finding that plaintiff’s testatrix was guilty of contributory negligence, is also against the weight of the credible evidence. Plaintiff’s testatrix was walking from north to south. She had reached a point within nine or ten feet of the south curb when she was struck. Defendant was traveling in an easterly direction. It is thus established that when she started to cross the roadway (which was forty-two feet in width) defendant’s car must have been several hundred feet away from her. The court charged the jury that its verdict must be in .favor of defendant if it were found that the accident did not happen substantially as testified to by plaintiff’s witnesses or that it did happen substantially as testified to by defendant’s witnesses. This charge was not excepted to, but was erroneous. In view of the circumstances present here, a new trial should be granted in the interests of justice.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Richmond Division 

In re: 

 LECLAIRRYAN PLLC, Case No. 19-34574-KRH 

 Chapter 11 

Debtor. 

ORDER 

Notwithstanding any purported deadlines to the contrary, objection(s) to the United States 

Trustee Motion to Convert Case to Chapter 7 [ECF No. 61] shall be filed in accordance with the 

Order Establishing Certain Notice, Case Management and Administrative Procedures [ECF No. 

38]. 

ENTERED: September 18, 2019 /s/ Kevin R. Huennekens 

 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE 

Entered on Docket: Sep 18 2019

Case 19-34574-KRH Doc 80 Filed 09/18/19 Entered 09/18/19 11:39:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ulticom, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Shawn K. Osborne,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Mark A. Kissman,
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                                 /s/ Shawn K. Osborne
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Shawn K. Osborne
                                                 President and CEO
                                                 Principal Executive Officer
                                                 December 10, 2004


                                                 /s/ Mark A. Kissman
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Mark A. Kissman
                                                 Vice President of Finance and
                                                 CFO
                                                 Principal Financial Officer
                                                 December 10, 2004

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
§ 75.51 How to prove nonprofit status. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70320 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) Under some programs, an applicant must show that it is a nonprofit organization. (See the definition of *nonprofit* in 34 CFR 77.1.)
( b ) An applicant may show that it is a nonprofit organization by any of the following means: ( 1 ) Proof that the Internal Revenue Service currently recognizes the applicant as an organization to which contributions are tax deductible under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code;
( 2 ) A statement from a State taxing body or the State attorney general certifying that: ( i ) The organization is a nonprofit organization operating within the State; and
( ii ) No part of its net earnings may lawfully benefit any private shareholder or individual;
( 3 ) A certified copy of the applicant's certificate of incorporation or similar document if it clearly establishes the nonprofit status of the applicant; or
( 4 ) Any item described in paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this section if that item applies to a State or national parent organization, together with a statement by the State or parent organization that the applicant is a local nonprofit affiliate.
[45 FR 22497, Apr. 3, 1980, as amended at 85 FR 82126, Dec. 17, 2020; 89 FR 15702, Mar. 4, 2024]
### §959. Enlistment in foreign service

(a) Whoever, within the United States, enlists or enters himself, or hires or retains another to enlist or enter himself, or to go beyond the jurisdiction of the United States with intent to be enlisted or entered in the service of any foreign prince, state, colony, district, or people as a soldier or as a marine or seaman on board any vessel of war, letter of marque, or privateer, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) This section shall not apply to citizens or subjects of any country engaged in war with a country with which the United States is at war, unless such citizen or subject of such foreign country shall hire or solicit a citizen of the United States to enlist or go beyond the jurisdiction of the United States with intent to enlist or enter the service of a foreign country. Enlistments under this subsection shall be under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army.

(c) This section and sections 960 and 961 of this title shall not apply to any subject or citizen of any foreign prince, state, colony, district, or people who is transiently within the United States and enlists or enters himself on board any vessel of war, letter of marque, or privateer, which at the time of its arrival within the United States was fitted and equipped as such, or hires or retains another subject or citizen of the same foreign prince, state, colony, district, or people who is transiently within the United States to enlist or enter himself to serve such foreign prince, state, colony, district, or people on board such vessel of war, letter of marque, or privateer, if the United States shall then be at peace with such foreign prince, state, colony, district, or people.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 745; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§22, 30 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §§10, 18, 35 Stat. 1089, 1091; May 7, 1917, ch. 11, 40 Stat. 39).

Section consolidates said sections of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed. Last sentence of section 30 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., relating to piracy and treason, was omitted as unnecessary.

Words "within the United States" were substituted for "within the jurisdiction" etc., in view of the definition of United States in section 5 of this title.

References in subsection (c) to sections 960 and 961 of this title are to the only other sections to which the subsection can apply.

Mandatory punishment provision was rephrased in the alternative.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000".
§ 607.31 How does a grantee maintain its eligibility? ( a ) A grantee shall maintain its eligibility under the requirements in § 607.2, except for § 607.2(a) (1) and (2), for the duration of the grant period.
( b ) The Secretary reviews an institution's application for a continuation award to ensure that— ( 1 ) The institution continues to meet the eligibility requirements described in paragraph (a) of this section; and
( 2 ) The institution is making substantial progress toward achieving the objectives set forth in its grant application including, if applicable, the institution's success in institutionalizing practices and improvements developed under the grant.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1057-1059b, 1066-1069f)
[59 FR 41925, Aug. 15, 1994]
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Infitech Ventures Inc. - Exhibit 10.09






PROMISSORY NOTE 

 

	Name of Borrower: 	Infitech Ventures Inc.
  
	  	20 Lyall Avenue 
	  	Toronto Ontario, Canada M4E
      1V9 
	  	  
	  	  
	  	  
	  	  
	Name of Lender: 	Paul G. Daly 
		20 Lyall
      Avenue
	  	Toronto Ontario, Canada M4E
      1V9 



 

	 	1. 	
      For value received, Borrower agrees to pay the Lender
      the amount of $US 6095.00 on a date to be determined. Payment will be sent
      to the Lender at 20 Lyall Avenue, Toronto Ontario Canada M4E 1V9. The loan
      is unsecured, non interest bearing and payable on demand. Payment can be
      made in cash or common stock with any stock repayment subject to
      requirements imposed by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934.





  Dated at the City of Toronto this 19th day of July
  2007. 

  

	Signature of Borrower or authorized signatory
      of Corporation	/s/ Paul G. Daly 
	 	 
	 	 
	Name of authorized signatory of Corporation	PAUL G. DALY
	 	 
	 	 
	Name of Corporation 	INFITECH VENTURES INC.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7533]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public 
comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the 
Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, May 26, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Gilbert at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(515) 564-6638.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be held Thursday, May 26, 2011, at 2 p.m., Eastern Time via 
telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or 
submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference 
lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Susan 
Gilbert. For more information please contact Ms. Gilbert at 1-888-912-
1227 or (515) 564-6638 or write: TAP Office, 210 Walnut Street, Stop 
5115, Des Moines, IA 50309, or contact us at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: March 24, 2011.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2011-7533 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 653

 661

 676

 641

 465

 336

 342

 351

 363

 381

 381

 386

 359

 298

 234

 226

 231

 240

 257

 258

 221

 222

 242

 261

 274

 291

 304

 305

 317

 342

 650

 654

 648

 471

 326

 309

 319

 317

 352

 366

 338

 351

 299

 229

 202

 215

 209

 227

 239

 222

 195

 210

 219

 218

 258

 261

 274

 290

 308

 318

 652

 659

 668

 538

 368

 320

 332

 331

 356

 373

 361

 367

 333

 268

 215

 222

 215

 232

 246

 244

 208

 216

 228

 234

 265

 276

 286

 295

 313

 334

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 1, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 419

 423

 429

 348

 243

 214

 221

 221

 236

 247

 239

 243

 222

 182

 149

 153

 149

 159

 168

 167

 145

 149

 157

 161

 180

 187

 193

 198

 209

 222

TOTAL 9,955

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
### Part E—Enforcement Under Rapid Response Labor Mechanism
----

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1512/2005 of 15 September 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 753/2002 laying down certain rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 as regards the description, designation, presentation and protection of certain wine sector products

(Official Journal of the European Union L 241 of 17 September 2005)

On page 26, in Annex I, in the second line ‘Vino de la Tierra’, in the fourth column ‘Language’:

insert:

               ‘Spanish’.

----