alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23


                        Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


   The Board of Directors
   Hein-Werner Corporation:

   We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement
   (No. 2-68020) on Form S-8 of Hein-Werner Corporation of our report dated
   February 14, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Hein-
   Werner Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and
   the related consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for each
   of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, and our
   report dated February 14, 1997, relating to the financial statement
   schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
   1996 which reports appear in the December 31, 1996 Annual Report on Form
   10-K of Hein-Werner Corporation.


                                                    /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                                        KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


   Milwaukee, Wisconsin 
   March 25, 1997
#### Michael J. Caruselle, Respondent, v. Moncar Co., Inc., et al., Appellants.

Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
United States Bankruptcy Court

Eastern District of Virginia

Alexandria Division

200 South Washington Street

Alexandria, VA 22314

Case Number 18−12795−BFK

Chapter 7

Judge Brian F. Kenney

In re: Debtor(s) (name(s) used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years, including married, maiden, trade, and address):

Novus Properties LLC

 505 East Braddock Rd., Apt. 406

Alexandria, VA 22314

Last four digits of Social−Security or Individual Taxpayer−Identification (ITIN) No(s).,(if any):

Debtor: NA

Employer Tax−Identification (EIN) No(s).(if any):

Debtor: 46−1259342

 NOTICE OF FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

To: Moving or Prevailing Party

 Upon a review of the above referenced case, or adversary proceeding, it appears that the parties may not be

diligently prosecuting the following matter:

14 − Motion for 2004 Examination Trustee's Motion for Examination of Navy Federal Credit Union Pursuant to

Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2004 filed by Janet M. Meiburger of The Meiburger Law Firm, P.C. on

behalf of Janet M. Meiburger. (Meiburger, Janet)

15 − Notice of Motion (Re: related document(s)14 Motion for 2004 Examination filed by Janet M. Meiburger)

filed by Janet M. Meiburger of The Meiburger Law Firm, P.C. on behalf of Janet M. Meiburger. (Meiburger,

Janet)

 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that unless there is some disposition made of this matter within fourteen (14)

days from the date of this notice, or unless cause is shown, in writing, why no action has been taken, an order will

be entered dismissing this matter for failure to prosecute to a conclusion.

Date: October 1, 2018

[ntcfailprosvJuly2013.jsp]

William C. Redden , Clerk

United States Bankruptcy Court

By /s/ Elizabeth W. Douglass

Deputy Clerk

Case 18-12795-BFK Doc 21 Filed 10/01/18 Entered 10/01/18 10:01:20 Desc Ntc of

 Failure to Prosecute Page 1 of 1
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed December 23, 2015.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D15- 1980

Lower Tribunal No. 15

- 13

________________



### City of Miami Beach, Florida, etc.,

Petitioner,

vs.



### John Deutzman,

Respondent.

A Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Appellate

Division, Gill S. Freeman, Bertila Soto, Thomas J. Rebull, Judges.

Raul J. Aguila, City Attorney, and Aleksandr Boksner, First Assistant City

Attorney, for petitioner.

John Deutzman, in proper person.

Before SHEPHERD, EMAS, and LOGUE, JJ.

LOGUE, J.

The City of Miami Beach seeks certiorari review of an order by the circuit

court in its appellate capacity, which awarded attorneys’ fees to Respondent. 1 Theorder was the first ruling on the question of attorneys’ fees. Properly viewed, our

proceeding is not the second, but rather the first tier of appellate review. See

Ramirez v. United Auto. Ins. Co.

, 67 So. 3d 1174, 1175-76 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)

(“Because the order denying appellate fees was the first ruling on the question, we

do not think that, properly viewed, this proceeding is the second, but rather the first

tier of appellate review

. . . .”). We have jurisdiction. See Mejia v. United Auto.

Ins. Co.

, 83 So. 3d 897, 898 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (using first-tier certiorari review

to quash an appellate circuit court’s order granting attorneys’ fees).

Attorneys’ fees cannot be awarded as a matter of equity. Attorney’s Title

Ins. Fund, Inc. v. Landa-Posada

, 984 So. 2d 641, 643 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

“Generally, a court may only award attorney’s fees when such fees are expressly

provided for by statute, rule, or contract.” Bane v. Bane

, 775 So. 2d 938, 940 (Fla.

2000) (quotation and citation omitted). Attorneys’ fees may also be awarded in

appropriate circumstances as a sanction. Moakley v. Smallwood

, 826 So. 2d 221,

227 (Fla. 2002); Landa-Posada

, 984 So. 2d at 643.

In this case, the circuit court did not state a basis for awarding attorneys’

fees. Nor did Respondent in his motion for fees. Without any basis for awarding

the fees, the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of the law. See

State, Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Trauth

, 971 So. 2d 906, 908

1 The City does not seek certiorari review of the portion of the order awarding

costs.

2(Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (“An award of appellate attorneys’ fees must be supported by

a particular contractual, statutory, or other substantive basis. Because the circuit

court appellate panel failed to state any basis for awarding attorneys’ fees, other

than [Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure] 9.400, the attorneys’ fee award cannot

stand.”) (internal citation omitted). We therefore grant the petition and quash the

portion of the order awarding attorneys’ fees.

Petition granted; order quashed in part.

3
§ 606.6 What regulations apply? The following regulations apply to the Developing Hispanic-Serving Institutions Program: ( a ) The Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) as follows: ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) 34 CFR part 75 (Direct Grant Programs), except 34 CFR 75.128(a)(2) and 75.129(a) in the case of applications for cooperative arrangements.
( 3 ) 34 CFR part 77 (Definitions that Apply to Department Regulations).
( 4 ) 34 CFR part 79 (Intergovernmental Review of Department of Education Programs and Activities).
( 5 ) 34 CFR part 82 (New Restrictions on Lobbying).
( 6 ) [Reserved]
( 7 ) 34 CFR part 86 (Drug-Free Schools and Campuses).
( b ) The regulations in this part 606.
( c ) (1) 2 CFR part 180 (OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement)), as adopted at 2 CFR part 3485; and ( 2 ) 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards), as adopted at 2 CFR part 3474.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1101 *et seq.*)
[64 FR 70147, Dec. 15, 1999, as amended at 79 FR 76100, Dec. 19, 2014]
§ 300.804 Eligibility. A State is eligible for a grant under section 619 of the Act if the State— ( a ) Is eligible under section 612 of the Act to receive a grant under Part B of the Act; and
( b ) Makes FAPE available to all children with disabilities, aged three through five, residing in the State.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0030) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1419(b))
No. 89-6775.

#### Sivley *v.*A. H. Robins Co., Inc.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 685.100 The William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program. ( a ) Under the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan (Direct Loan) Program (formerly known as the Federal Direct Student Loan Program), the Secretary makes loans to enable a student or parent to pay the costs of the student's attendance at a postsecondary school. This part governs the Federal Direct Stafford/Ford Loan Program, the Federal Direct Unsubsidized Stafford/Ford Loan Program, the Federal Direct PLUS Program, and the Federal Direct Consolidation Loan Program. The Secretary makes loans under the following program components: ( 1 ) ( i ) Federal Direct Stafford/Ford Loan Program (Direct Subsidized Loan Program), which provides loans to undergraduate, graduate, and professional students. Loans made under this program are referred to as Direct Subsidized Loans. Except as provided in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section, the Secretary subsidizes the interest while the borrower is in an in-school, grace, or deferment period. Graduate and professional students are not eligible to receive Direct Subsidized Loans for any period of enrollment beginning on or after July 1, 2012.
( ii ) The Secretary does not subsidize the interest that accrues during the grace period on any Direct Subsidized Loan for which the first disbursement is made on or after July 1, 2012 and before July 1, 2014.
( 2 ) Federal Direct Unsubsidized Stafford/Ford Loan Program (Direct Unsubsidized Loan Program), which provides loans to undergraduate, graduate and professional students. Loans made under this program are referred to as Direct Unsubsidized Loans. The borrower is responsible for the interest that accrues during any period.
( 3 ) Federal Direct PLUS Program (Direct PLUS Loan Program), which provides loans to parents of dependent students and to graduate or professional students. Loans made under this program are referred to as Direct PLUS Loans. The borrower is responsible for the interest that accrues during any period.
( 4 ) Federal Direct Consolidation Loan Program (Direct Consolidation Loan Program), which provides loans to borrowers to consolidate certain Federal educational loans. Loans made under this program are referred to as Direct Consolidation Loans.
( b ) The Secretary makes a Direct Subsidized Loan, a Direct Unsubsidized Loan, or a Direct PLUS Loan only to a student or a parent of a student enrolled in a school that participates in the Direct Loan Program.
( c ) The Secretary makes a Direct Consolidation Loan only to a borrower who is consolidating at least one loan made under the Direct Loan Program or the Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) Program.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1087a *et seq.*)
[59 FR 61690, Dec. 1, 1994, as amended at 71 FR 45709, Aug. 9, 2006; 78 FR 65823, Nov. 1, 2013]
**Exhibit 7.1**

----

| **Exhibit 7.1** | **Ratio of earnings to fixed charges — continuing operations** |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|

For the purpose of computing this ratio, earnings consist of the income from Continuing operations before taxation of Group companies and income received from companies owned 50% or less, plus fixed charges excluding capitalised interest. Fixed charges consist of interest (including capitalised interest) on all indebtedness, amortisation of debt discount and expense and that portion of rental expense representative of the interest factor.

|                                                                    |   | **2003** |   | **2002** |   | **2001** |   | **2000** |   | **1999** |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------|--------|----------|--------|----------|--------|----------|--------|----------|--------|
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                      |   |     |   |     |   |     |   |     |   |     |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                                |   |     |   |     |   |     |   |     |   |     |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| For the Group (under UK GAAP)                                           |   |     | 1.5    |     |   | 2.3      |   |     | 1.7    |     |   | 2.4 |   |   | 1.6 |   |
|                                                                         |   |
| For          the Group with material adjustments to accord with US GAAP |   |     | 0.6    |     |   | 1.0      |   |     | 1.5    |     |   | — |   |   | 1.3 |   |
|                                                                         |   |

The deficiency of earnings to fixed    charges under US GAAP for the years ended December 31, 2003, and 2000    was £73m and £422m respectively.

----
§ 75.225 What procedures does the Secretary use if the Secretary decides to give special consideration to novice applications? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70326 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) As used in this section, “novice applicant” means— ( 1 ) Any applicant for a grant from ED that— ( i ) Has never received a grant or subgrant under the program from which it seeks funding;
( ii ) Has never been a member of a group application, submitted in accordance with §§ 75.127-75.129, that received a grant under the program from which it seeks funding; and
( iii ) Has not had an active discretionary grant from the Federal Government in the five years before the deadline date for applications under the program.
( 2 ) In the case of a group application submitted in accordance with §§ 75.127-75.129, a group that includes only parties that meet the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( b ) For the purposes of paragraph (a)(1)(iii) of this section, a grant is active until the end of the grant's project or funding period, including any extensions of those periods that extend the grantee's authority to obligate funds.
( c ) If the Secretary determines that special consideration of novice applications is appropriate, the Secretary may either— ( 1 ) Establish a separate competition for novice applicants; or
( 2 ) Give competitive preference to novice applicants under the procedures in 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2).
( d ) Before making a grant to a novice applicant, the Secretary imposes special conditions, if necessary, to ensure the grant is managed effectively and project objectives are achieved.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
[66 FR 60138, Nov. 30, 2001; 67 FR 4316, Jan. 29, 2002]
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

February 2003

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Delta Smelt Splittail Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day

SWP CVP Total Average SWP CVP Total Average

1-Feb-03 45 12 57 213 12 12 24 56 7147 4310 11457 14177 8548 22725

2-Feb-03 99 12 111 209 21 24 45 55 7158 4297 11455 14197 8524 22721

3-Feb-03 84 24 108 208 48 0 48 56 7131 4286 11417 14144 8502 22646

4-Feb-03 69 0 69 187 12 0 12 52 6886 4275 11161 13658 8479 22137

5-Feb-03 102 0 102 166 18 0 18 50 7058 4276 11334 13999 8482 22481

6-Feb-03 111 0 111 155 3 0 3 44 7144 4279 11424 14171 8488 22659

7-Feb-03 57 0 57 129 9 0 9 38 7344 4262 11605 14566 8453 23019

8-Feb-03 57 24 81 115 18 0 18 32 7355 4306 11660 14588 8540 23128

9-Feb-03 57 36 93 103 0 0 0 27 7230 4280 11510 14340 8490 22830

10-Feb-03 12 0 12 92 34 0 34 26 7318 4286 11604 14515 8501 23016

11-Feb-03 9 24 33 85 6 0 6 20 7186 4308 11494 14254 8544 22798

12-Feb-03 24 0 24 78 6 0 6 20 7158 4326 11484 14197 8581 22778

13-Feb-03 30 12 42 72 0 0 0 18 7121 4342 11463 14125 8612 22737

14-Feb-03 9 12 21 66 0 12 12 17 534 3820 4354 1060 7577 8637

15-Feb-03 0 36 36 64 0 12 12 16 495 3604 4099 982 7148 8130

16-Feb-03 24 60 84 62 15 12 27 15 7654 4191 11845 15181 8313 23494

17-Feb-03 18 48 66 59 29 0 29 13 7140 4344 11484 14163 8616 22779

18-Feb-03 18 36 54 58 18 0 18 14 7139 4333 11472 14160 8595 22755

19-Feb-03 18 60 78 57 24 24 48 16 7103 4353 11456 14088 8635 22723

20-Feb-03 24 0 24 50 30 24 54 20 7118 4287 11405 14118 8504 22622

21-Feb-03 9 12 21 48 15 0 15 20 7135 4289 11424 14152 8507 22659

22-Feb-03 12 24 36 45 6 24 30 21 7176 4305 11481 14233 8539 22772

23-Feb-03 0 0 0 38 12 0 12 22 7208 4325 11533 14297 8579 22876

24-Feb-03 0 0 0 37 6 0 6 20 7242 4339 11581 14364 8607 22971

25-Feb-03 0 12 12 36 6 0 6 20 7149 4358 11507 14180 8644 22824

26-Feb-03 42 72 114 42 0 0 0 19 3773 4365 8137 7483 8657 16140

27-Feb-03 9 12 21 41 6 12 18 21 3006 4364 7370 5962 8656 14618

28-Feb-03 12 12 24 41 0 0 0 20 4546 4337 8883 9017 8603 17620

Total 951 540 1491 XXXX 354 156 510 XXXX 177651 119447 297099 352371 236924 589295

Delta Smelt Incidental Take Levels

Yellow Light Level = 400 (14 day Average)

Red Light Level = 10,910 (February-Below Normal)

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Tracy Combined
Case 15-34995-KRH Doc 11 Filed 01/05/16 Entered 01/05/16 10:22:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 13
Case 15-34995-KRH Doc 11 Filed 01/05/16 Entered 01/05/16 10:22:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 13
Case 15-34995-KRH Doc 11 Filed 01/05/16 Entered 01/05/16 10:22:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 13
Case 15-34995-KRH Doc 11 Filed 01/05/16 Entered 01/05/16 10:22:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 13
Case 15-34995-KRH Doc 11 Filed 01/05/16 Entered 01/05/16 10:22:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 13
Case 15-34995-KRH Doc 11 Filed 01/05/16 Entered 01/05/16 10:22:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 13
Case 15-34995-KRH Doc 11 Filed 01/05/16 Entered 01/05/16 10:22:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 13
Case 15-34995-KRH Doc 11 Filed 01/05/16 Entered 01/05/16 10:22:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 13
Case 15-34995-KRH Doc 11 Filed 01/05/16 Entered 01/05/16 10:22:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 13
Case 15-34995-KRH Doc 11 Filed 01/05/16 Entered 01/05/16 10:22:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 13
Case 15-34995-KRH Doc 11 Filed 01/05/16 Entered 01/05/16 10:22:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 11 of 13
Case 15-34995-KRH Doc 11 Filed 01/05/16 Entered 01/05/16 10:22:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 12 of 13
Case 15-34995-KRH Doc 11 Filed 01/05/16 Entered 01/05/16 10:22:58 Desc Main

 Document Page 13 of 13
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5020 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to seek to enter into an agreement 

with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 

or the National Cancer Institute to conduct a study on radiation exposure 

relating to prostate cancer. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 8, 2019 

Mr. PANETTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to seek to enter 

into an agreement with the National Academies of 

Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine or the National 

Cancer Institute to conduct a study on radiation exposure relating to prostate cancer. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STUDY ON RADIATION EXPOSURE RELATING 

4 TO PROSTATE CANCER. 

5 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall 

6 seek to enter into an agreement with the National Acad7 emies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine or the NaVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:24 Nov 21, 2019 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5020.IH H5020

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5020 IH

1 tional Cancer Institute to conduct a study to determine 

2 whether prostate cancer should be added to the list of dis3 eases specified in section 1112(c) of title 38, United States 

4 Code, and considered to have been incurred in or aggra5 vated during the active military, naval, or air service of 

6 radiation-exposed veterans. 

7 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the date 

8 on which the Secretary receives the study conducted pur9 suant to subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the 

10 Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Rep11 resentatives and the Senate a report on such study. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Corporation for National and Community Service

          - 45 CFR Part 2522 

### CFR Correction 

In Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1200 to End, revised as of October 1, 2010, on page 674, in § 2522.910, paragraph (b)(1)(ii) is removed. 

[FR Doc. 2011-7439 Filed 3-28-11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Case 19-13417-BFK Doc 48 Filed 03/20/20 Entered 03/23/20 10:33:32 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 10
Case 19-13417-BFK Doc 48 Filed 03/20/20 Entered 03/23/20 10:33:32 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 10
Case 19-13417-BFK Doc 48 Filed 03/20/20 Entered 03/23/20 10:33:32 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 10
Case 19-13417-BFK Doc 48 Filed 03/20/20 Entered 03/23/20 10:33:32 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 10
Case 19-13417-BFK Doc 48 Filed 03/20/20 Entered 03/23/20 10:33:32 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 10
Case 19-13417-BFK Doc 48 Filed 03/20/20 Entered 03/23/20 10:33:32 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 10
Case 19-13417-BFK Doc 48 Filed 03/20/20 Entered 03/23/20 10:33:32 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 10
Case 19-13417-BFK Doc 48 Filed 03/20/20 Entered 03/23/20 10:33:32 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 10
Case 19-13417-BFK Doc 48 Filed 03/20/20 Entered 03/23/20 10:33:32 Desc Main

Document Page 9 of 10
Case 19-13417-BFK Doc 48 Filed 03/20/20 Entered 03/23/20 10:33:32 Desc Main

Document Page 10 of 10
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1577/2004

of 8 September 2004         

amending the representative prices and additional duties for the import of certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1210/2004 for the 2004/2005 marketing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1423/95 of 23 June 1995 laying down detailed implementing rules for the import of products in the sugar sector other than molasses (2), and in particular the second sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 1(2), and Article 3(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The representative prices and additional duties on imports of the products referred to in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1423/95, as fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1210/2004 for the 2004/2005 marketing year are hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 9 September 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 September 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Agriculture Director-General

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 141, 24.6.1995, p. 16. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 624/98 (OJ L 85, 20.3.1998, p. 5).

(3)OJ L 232, 1.7.2004, p. 11.

(4)OJ L 285, 4.9.2004, p. 15.

----

ANNEX

Amended representative prices and additional duties applicable to imports of white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 1702 90 99  applicable from 9 September 2004

----

(1)  Fixed for the standard quality defined in Annex I.II to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 (OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1).

(2)  Fixed for the standard quality defined in Annex I.I to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 (OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1).

(3)  Fixed per 1 % sucrose content.

----