alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w2



 





Exhibit 10.2


Description of Stock Grant to W. Douglas Parker




     On October 17, 2007, W. Douglas Parker was appointed as a director of Pinnacle West Capital
Corporation (“Pinnacle West”), effective November 1, 2007. Under the Pinnacle West Capital
Corporation 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”), the Human Resources Committee of
Pinnacle West’s Board of Directors approved a grant of 1,100 shares of Pinnacle West common stock
to Mr. Parker, effective November 1, 2007. Pinnacle West’s non-employee directors are also
eligible to receive an annual common stock grant under the 2007 Plan. As a condition to Mr. Parker
being eligible to receive the 2008 annual common stock grant to non-employee directors, Mr. Parker
must own at least 900 shares of Pinnacle West common stock on June 30, 2008 (which may include
shares of Pinnacle West common stock to be received by Mr. Parker on November 1, 2007). Mr.
Parker’s annual stock ownership requirement in connection with the annual common stock grant will
increase by 900 shares per year thereafter (e.g., Mr. Parker must own at least 1,800 shares of
Pinnacle West common stock on June 30, 2009 to be eligible for the 2009 annual common stock grant).
#### Julia Kollis, as Administratrix, etc., of Joseph Kollis, Deceased, Respondent, v. Buffalo Union Terminal Railroad Company, Appellant.

Order modified by striking therefrom the provisions respecting the production of records and photographs, and as so modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Held, that the provision of the order respecting the production of paper is too general. All concurred.
### §755. Officer permitting escape

Whoever, having in his custody any prisoner by virtue of process issued under the laws of the United States by any court, judge, or magistrate judge, voluntarily suffers such prisoner to escape, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both; or if he negligently suffers such person to escape, he shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 735; Pub. L. 90–578, title IV, §402(b)(2), Oct. 17, 1968, 82 Stat. 1118; Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §321, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5117; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(G), (I), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 104–132, title VII, §705(a)(2), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1295.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§244, 662e, 665 (Feb. 6, 1905, ch. 454, §2, 33 Stat. 698; Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §§138, 139, 35 Stat. 1113; Mar. 22, 1934, ch. 73, §4, 48 Stat. 456).

Sections 244, 662e and 665 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., were consolidated. The two latter sections merely extended application of the former. This section has been greatly condensed by changes in phraseology which do not affect the substance.

Enumeration of "marshal, deputy marshal, ministerial officer, or other person," was omitted as surplusage.

Provision making section applicable to cases of prisoners in custody pending extradition or removal proceedings as well as prisoners convicted of offenses against the United States was likewise omitted as unnecessary.

Changes in phraseology were made.

#### Senate Revision Amendment

The text of this section was changed by Senate amendment in view of the act of June 21, 1947, ch. 111, 61 Stat. 134, which, by amending section 244 of Title 18, U.S.C., became an additional source of this section. The amendment constitutes the last clause of this section. See Senate Report No. 1620, amendment No. 8, 80th Cong.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–132 substituted "5 years" for "two years".

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $2,000" after "escape, shall be" and for "fined not more than $500" after "he shall be".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Words "magistrate judge" substituted for "magistrate" in text pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as a note under section 631 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure. Previously, "magistrate" substituted for "commissioner" pursuant to Pub. L. 90–578. See chapter 43 (§631 et seq.) of Title 28.
§ 303.303 Referral procedures. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) The lead agency's child find system described in § 303.302 must include the State's procedures for use by primary referral sources for referring a child under the age of three to the part C program.
( 2 ) The procedures required in paragraph (a)(1) of this section must— ( i ) Provide for referring a child as soon as possible, but in no case more than seven days, after the child has been identified; and
( ii ) Meet the requirements in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) *Referral of specific at-risk infants and toddlers.* The procedures required in paragraph (a) of this section must provide for requiring the referral of a child under the age of three who— ( 1 ) Is the subject of a substantiated case of child abuse or neglect; or
( 2 ) Is identified as directly affected by illegal substance abuse or withdrawal symptoms resulting from prenatal drug exposure.
( c ) *Primary referral sources.* As used in this subpart, primary referral sources include— ( 1 ) Hospitals, including prenatal and postnatal care facilities;
( 2 ) Physicians;
( 3 ) Parents, including parents of infants and toddlers;
( 4 ) Child care programs and early learning programs;
( 5 ) LEAs and schools;
( 6 ) Public health facilities;
( 7 ) Other public health or social service agencies;
( 8 ) Other clinics and health care providers;
( 9 ) Public agencies and staff in the child welfare system, including child protective service and foster care;
( 10 ) Homeless family shelters; and
( 11 ) Domestic violence shelters and agencies.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(3)(A), 1431, 1434(1), 1435(a)(2), 1435(a)(5), 1435(a)(6), 1435(c)(2)(G), 1437(a)(6), 1437(a)(10), 1441)
§ 675.41 Special definitions. The following definitions apply to this subpart: ( a ) *Work-college:* An eligible institution that— ( 1 ) Is a public or private nonprofit, four-year, degree-granting institution with a commitment to community service;
( 2 ) Has operated a comprehensive work-learning-service program for at least two years;
( 3 ) Requires resident students, including at least one-half of all students who are enrolled on a full-time basis, to participate in a comprehensive work-learning-service program for at least five hours each week, or at least 80 hours during each period of enrollment, except summer school, unless the student is engaged in an institutionally organized or approved study abroad or externship program; and
( 4 ) Provides students participating in the comprehensive work-learning-service program with the opportunity to contribute to their education and to the welfare of the community as a whole.
( b ) *Comprehensive student work-learning-service program:* A student work-learning-service program that— ( 1 ) Is an integral and stated part of the institution's educational philosophy and program;
( 2 ) Requires participation of all resident students for enrollment and graduation;
( 3 ) Includes learning objectives, evaluation, and a record of work performance as part of the student's college record;
( 4 ) Provides programmatic leadership by college personnel at levels comparable to traditional academic programs;
( 5 ) Recognizes the educational role of work-learning-service supervisors; and
( 6 ) Includes consequences for nonperformance or failure in the work-learning-service program similar to the consequences for failure in the regular academic program.
(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2756b)
[59 FR 61418, Nov. 30, 1994, as amended at 74 FR 55950, Oct. 29, 2009]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 161

 155

 165

 164

 241

 337

 589

 1,084

 2,643

 4,038

 3,289

 2,323

 1,975

 1,826

 1,691

 1,568

 2,138

 2,937

 3,521

 4,348

 5,071

 6,013

 7,306

 7,781

 7,411

 6,745

 5,324

 3,949

 4,028

 3,425

 3,645

 123

 125

 125

 126

 129

 132

 134

 137

 140

 159

 157

 164

 163

 168

 167

 153

 186

 234

 210

 219

 242

 244

 231

 264

 325

 400

 412

 421

 590

 316

 353

 138

 135

 134

 135

 146

 168

 219

 317

 736

 1,116

 1,036

 861

 834

 828

 820

 725

 680

 936

 1,219

 1,541

 1,882

 2,096

 2,391

 2,851

 2,971

 3,021

 2,741

 2,457

 2,443

 1,953

 1,630

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 3, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 479

 497

 496

 499

 504

 520

 531

 526

 545

 541

 545

 549

 555

 557

 557

 568

 578

 565

 562

 564

 540

 569

 541

 584

 580

 532

 537

 540

 525

 539

 544

 399

 412

 445

 456

 453

 464

 474

 472

 469

 462

 469

 503

 503

 492

 515

 514

 528

 528

 522

 524

 517

 510

 487

 502

 481

 465

 484

 487

 496

 500

 486

 446

 459

 470

 480

 484

 494

 507

 507

 513

 514

 514

 526

 531

 535

 540

 549

 557

 550

 544

 539

 526

 530

 511

 527

 511

 497

 500

 504

 509

 518

 518

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 10, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 292

 300

 306

 313

 315

 321

 329

 329

 333

 334

 334

 341

 344

 347

 350

 355

 360

 356

 352

 349

 341

 344

 332

 342

 332

 323

 325

 327

 331

 336

 336

TOTAL 15,910

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
#### § 303.341 [Reserved]
**Exhibit 10.1**

** **

6 November 2007

 

Mr JJ Haley President and Chief Executive Officer Watson Wyatt Worldwide, Inc 901 N. Glebe Road Arlington, VA 22203

 

Dear John

 

**ContingentStock**

 

In accordance withSchedule 7 to the Business Transfer Agreement (“BTA”), we hereby confirm that we agree the Purchaser’s determination of the 2007 Net Revenue andthe 2007 Aggregate Staff Costs.  Since itfalls 40 Business Days after the date on which a statement of the aforementioned amounts was delivered to Ringley House LLP,today, November 6, 2007, becomes the Final Determination Date for the purposes ofthe BTA.

 

According to Clause 4.4of the BTA, Watson Wyatt Worldwide, Inc is required to issue the Contingent Stock within 10 Business Days of today’s date - that is, byTuesday November 20, 2007. However, we have requested that the issue of theContingent Stock be deferred until on or after 14 April 2008, and accordingly we agree thatthis provision of the BTA should be waived and replaced by a requirement to issue theContingent Stock not later than 30 April 2008.

 

We confirm that formerMain Partners are aware that they will not be entitled to dividends on the Contingent Stock until it is issued, and that this will applyregardless of the dividend policy of Watson Wyatt Worldwide, Inc.

 

For and on behalf ofRingley House LLP,

 
| /s/Nick Drumbeck  |   | /s/ Ian Skinner   |
|-------------------|--------|-------------------|
|              |   |              |
| Nick Dumbreck     |   | Ian Skinner       |
| Designated Member |   | Designated Member |

 

 

** **

**Ringley House LLP**Watson House, London Road, Reigate, Surrey RH2 9PQ, UK\+44(0)1737 241144*Telephone\*+44 (0)1737 241496 *Fax*

 

RingleyHouse LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and WalesRegistration number: OC 301975, Registered address: Watson House, London Road,Reigate, Surrey RH2 9PQ.

 

----
### §7914. Shooting ranges

#### (a) In general

Except as provided in subsection (b), the Secretary concerned may, in accordance with this section and other applicable law, lease or permit the use of Federal land for a shooting range.

#### (b) Exception

The Secretary concerned shall not lease or permit the use of Federal land for a shooting range within—

(1) a component of the National Landscape Conservation System;

(2) a component of the National Wilderness Preservation System;

(3) any area that is—

(A) designated as a wilderness study area;

(B) administratively classified as—

(i) wilderness-eligible; or

(ii) wilderness-suitable; or

(C) a primitive or semiprimitive area;

(4) a national monument, national volcanic monument, or national scenic area; or

(5) a component of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (including areas designated for study for potential addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System).

(Pub. L. 116–9, title IV, §4104, Mar. 12, 2019, 133 Stat. 759.)
### SUBCHAPTER IV—DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN ANTIDUMPING AND COUNTERVAILING DUTY CASES
Sanitized Description of Rotating Shift
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-11123 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus OSCAR LUIS MATA-RAMOS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:03-CR-103-ALL-M

-------------------- Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Oscar Luis Mata-Ramos appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United Statesafter deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. MataRamos complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a prior conviction. Mata-Ramos thus contends that his sentence should not exceed the maximum term of imprisonment prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).No. 03-11123 -2-
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Mata-Ramos acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
(No. 74-CC-433

#### Phillips Business Systems, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Appellate Court of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 8, 1974.*

Phillips Business Systems, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
EXHIBIT 23.1**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements(Form S-8 No. 333-72444 and Form S-8 No. 333-42904) pertaining to the California Pizza Kitchen,Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1998 Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plan and 1990Employee Stock Option Plan of our report dated  January 25, 2002, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. included in the AnnualReport (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 30, 2001.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP          
Long Beach, CaliforniaMarch 7, 2002**
## Scoping W orkshop Public Meeting on Plans for Developing 

## Energy Conservation Standards for B attery Chargers and External Power Supplies January 24
, 2007 - W ashington, DC
DOE Actions in response to requirements in the Energy Policy Act of 2005

Sec. 325 of EPCA as revised by . Sec. 135 of EPACT 2005 (Public Law No. 109-58)

(u) BATTERY CHARGER AND EXTERNAL POWER SUPPLY ELECTRIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION.-(1)(A) Not later than 18 months after August 8, 2005, the Secretary shall, after providing notice and an opportunity for comment, prescribe, by rule, definitions and test procedures for the power use of battery chargers and external power supplies. (B) In establishing the test procedures under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall: (i) consider existing definitions and test procedures used for measuring energy consumption in standby mode and other modes; and

(42 U.S.C. 6295(u) (1) (A) and (B)(i), emphasis added)
(ii) assess the current and projected future market for battery chargers and external power supplies. (C) The assessment under subparagraph (B)(ii) shall include- (i) estimates of the significance of potential energy savings from technical improvements to battery chargers and external power supplies; and (ii) suggested product classes for energy conservation standards.

(42 U.S.C. 6295(u) (1) (B) (ii) and (C), emphasis added)
(D) Not later than 18 months after August 8, 2005, the Secretary shall hold a scoping workshop to discuss and receive comments on plans for developing energy conservation standards for energy use for battery chargers and external power supplies. (42 U.S.C. 6295(u)(1)(D), emphasis added)

(E)(i) Not later than 3 years after August 8, 2005, the Secretary shall issue a final rule that determines whether energy conservation standards shall be issued for battery chargers and external power supplies or classes of battery chargers and external power supplies. (42 US.C 6295(u)(1)(E)(i), emphasis added)
(ii) For each product class, any energy conservation standards issued under clause (i) shall be set at the lowest level of energy use that- (I) meets the criteria and procedures of subsections (o), (p), (q), (r), (s), and (t) of this section; and (II) would result in significant overall annual energy savings, considering standby mode and other operating modes. (42 U.S.C. 6295(u)(1)(E)(ii)) DOE Action

En Masse Test Procedure NOPR: 7/25/06 Final Rule: 12/8/06 (Deadline: 2/8/07)

"Current and Projected Future Market for BCs and EPSs" Web-published 12/29/06 for Scoping Workshop.

Scoping Workshop held 1/24/07. "Plans for Developing a Energy Conservation Standards" Web-published 12/29/06 for Scoping Workshop. (Deadline: 2/8/07)

Determination Analysis on BCs and EPSs (Deadline: 8/8/08)

(Only implemented if a positive determination)
#### § 648.64 What are unallowable costs?

Neither grant funds nor the institutional matching funds may be used to pay for general operational overhead costs of the academic department.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1135, 1135d)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 936

 937

 944

 955

 952

 985

 927

 946

 972

 1,033

 953

 966

 909

 964

 936

 904

 875

 866

 873

 865

 860

 914

 934

 956

 967

 964

 969

 0

 0

 0

 0

 412

 421

 428

 429

 411

 433

 454

 476

 478

 477

 442

 412

 414

 438

 441

 470

 461

 468

 481

 537

 504

 492

 498

 494

 498

 498

 558

 0

 0

 0

 0

 598

 572

 580

 584

 588

 595

 629

 744

 758

 742

 589

 581

 577

 622

 622

 631

 621

 620

 641

 625

 625

 632

 637

 642

 650

 644

 754

 0

 0

 0

 0

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:January 20, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 386

 369

 374

 377

 379

 384

 405

 476

 484

 475

 380

 375

 373

 400

 400

 406

 400

 399

 412

 402

 402

 407

 410

 413

 418

 414

 482

 0

 0

 0

 0

TOTAL 17,103

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
§ 643.23 How does the Secretary set the amount of a grant? ( a ) The Secretary sets the amount of a grant on the basis of— ( 1 ) 34 CFR 75.232 and 75.233, for new grants; and
( 2 ) 34 CFR 75.253, for the second and subsequent years of a project period.
( b ) If the circumstances described in section 402A(b)(3) of the HEA exist, the Secretary uses the available funds to set the amount of the grant at the lesser of— ( 1 ) $200,000; or
( 2 ) The amount requested by the applicant.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1840-0549) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-11)
[58 FR 59145, Nov. 5, 1993, as amended at 75 FR 65778, Oct. 26, 2010]
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

AUSTIN

mar Senator Eelley~ opraioll lo& \

c or not theHonorableRogers ~ielley, Pago 3

In irecpLng

With our constructionof Section 2 of the original**Aot,** your ilill under **0onsWeretion** likewtse requires the secretaryto the Board to be selected from ansong

the amxihershlp

OP the Board. We construe your kIill,as

WQ oonstruedthe originalnot, to be not the czeetion of an offloe or positionfiatsower, but -rely the superaddingto the duties of the partfoular hoard member selootod the furtherduties of those oi' Sc)gretarp-Treasurer to the ntmrd. There is there?o?e but one OffLCe or position -- that is, membershipin the POard

.

Par the reasons just stated, the 00nstltutional poti8i.0~1

against dual offlo%-holding hate no applleafion. Seat&on40, of ArticleXVI 0P the Constitution merely Porbids the holding of *more **than** one oivil of'f+%ae of'tm~luarant lí Seotion 33 of the same Article **forbids** the aoOountinS officers 0f the State to &a~ or PsrJ a warrant upon the treasuryin favor of any personPa salary Or Oolapensation

as agent, ofiiaer or appointee,who *holds at the saate



## time any other offloe or position of honor, trust or profitunder th2.s State or the 

## UnitedStates.* Uxter the fasts statedby you, the status of the Semetax-y-Treasurer

to the Board Of Texas College of Arts aud Irdustries,

as providedi.n

yaur &mate Bill No. 33, muld ljethat of a utember of the Board oi Texas CollegeW Arts aad xudustrios-- **ona** offtae or position- am3 under the terPg of the Bill, in the went it boWmes a lsw, there rould **be** PO val%U reason why the BOard should not pay the ~osqnmsation

to the So~retary-'Proasurer **thorefn** stipulated.

Very **truly** pure

ATTOLW3X GBNNR1Lt

OF TX3

&..cPROVDm 10, I%1
# Official Journal C 138/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 138 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4913 June 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 138

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4913 June 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 138/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 138/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4227 — Umicore/Solvay/Solvicore JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 138/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 138/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4227 — Umicore/Solvay/Solvicore JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

2

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN