alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(54 South. 940.)

No. 18,315.

#### CITY OF CROWLEY v. BRANDE.

(April 10, 1911.)

*(Syllabus by the Court.)*

Courts (§ 224*) — Appeal — Jurisdiction — Constitutional Questions.

No appeal lies to this court from the judgment of a municipal court, sustaining the legality of a municipal ordinance and sentencing a defendant to pay a fine of $100 or suffer imprisonment in jail for 30 days.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Courts, Cent. Dig. §§ 008-618; Dec. Dig. § 224.*)

Appeal from City Court of Crowley; W. P. Campbell, Judge.

A. W. Brande was convicted of violating an ordinance of the City of Crowley, and appeals.

Dismissed.

Taylor & Gremillion, for appellant. Harry W. Gueno, for appellee.

MONROE, -J.

Defendant was charged, by affidavit, before the city court of Crowley, with keeping a house for gambling purposes and allowing gambling to he carried on there, and he moved to quash the affidavit, on the ground that the ordinance under which he was prosecuted has never been legally passed, published, or promulgated, as required by law, and that it does not cover the offense charged, which motion was overruled. Thereafter, as we are informed by a bill of exception that we find in the record, defendant pleaded to the charge, the case went' to trial, the city of Crowley introduced the testimony of two witnesses, and defendant, offering no evidence, was adjudged guilty, and sentenced to pay a fine, or, in default of such payment, to imprisonment. The bill of exception further recites that^ the counsel for the city of Crowley closed the case — •

> “without offering in evidence any ordinance, or affidavit, or certificate from the city clerk, or the public printer, showing that such ordinance had been legally printed, published, and promulgated, in view of the fact that the constitutionality of said ordinance had been attacked on the ground that it had not been promulgated as required by the laws regulating and governing the city of Crowley.”

The bill further shows that a suspensive appeal was allowed from the judgment referred to, and the defendant has lodged the appeal here. But this court has no appellate jurisdiction, whether by reason of the offense charged or the penalty imposed, and could exercise such jurisdiction only if the ordinance which defendant attacked had been declared unconstitutional. Const, art. 85.

The appeal is therefore dismissed:
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, John Boschert, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Balsam Ventures, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                        

| | By:    | /s/
      John Boschert    
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | JOHN BOSCHERT              
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | May 13, 2008               

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
§ 462.10 How does the Secretary review tests? ( a ) The Secretary only reviews tests under this part that are submitted by a test publisher.
( b ) A test publisher that wishes to have the suitability of its test determined by the Secretary under this part must submit an application to the Secretary, in the manner the Secretary may prescribe, by October 1, 2016, April 1, 2017, October 1, 2017, April 1, 2018, October 1, 2018, and by October 1 of each year thereafter.
(Authority: 29 U.S.C. 3292)
[73 FR 2315, Jan. 14, 2008, as amended at 81 FR 55552, Aug. 19, 2016]
#### Henrietta Simon, Respondent, v. Julius Etgen and Others, as Executors, etc., of William H. Burgess, Deceased, Appellants.

Motion to resettle order granted, without costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Kim Boyce, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report (the Report) on Form 10-QSB of the small business issuer;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;  4.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:August 17, 2007By:/s/Kim BoyceKim Boyce, President and Director
H. R. 5123 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 476 East 

Main Street in Galesburg, Illinois, as the ‘‘Senior Airman Daniel Miller Post 

Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SENIOR AIRMAN DANIEL MILLER POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 476 East Main Street in Galesburg, Illinois, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Senior Airman Daniel Miller 

Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Senior Airman Daniel Miller Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
§ 462.41 How must tests be administered in order to accurately measure educational gain? ( a ) *General.* A local eligible provider must measure the educational gains of students using only tests that the Secretary has determined are suitable for use in the NRS and that the State has identified in its assessment policy.
( b ) *Pre-test.* A local eligible provider must— ( 1 ) Administer a pre-test to measure a student's educational functioning level at intake, or as soon as possible thereafter;
( 2 ) Administer the pre-test to students at a uniform time, according to the State's assessment policy; and
( 3 ) Administer pre-tests to students in the skill areas identified in the State's assessment policy.
( c ) *Post-test.* A local eligible provider must— ( 1 ) Administer a post-test to measure a student's educational functioning level after a set time period or number of instructional hours;
( 2 ) Administer the post-test to students at a uniform time, according to the State's assessment policy;
( 3 ) ( i ) Administer post-tests with a secure, parallel, equated form of the same test—either traditional paper and pencil or computer-administered instruments—for which forms are constructed prior to administration to examinees to pre-test and determine the initial placement of students; or
( ii ) Administer post-tests with an adaptive test that uses computerized algorithms for selecting and administering items in real time; however, for such an instrument, the size of the item pool and the method of item selection must ensure negligible overlap in items across pre- and post-testing; and
( 4 ) Administer post-tests to students in the same skill areas as the pre-test.
( d ) *Other requirements.* ( 1 ) A local eligible provider must administer a test using only staff who have been trained to administer the test.
( 2 ) A local eligible provider may use the results of a test in the NRS only if the test was administered in a manner that is consistent with the State's assessment policy and the test publisher's guidelines.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1830-0027) (Authority: 29 U.S.C. 3292)
[73 FR 2315, Jan. 14, 2008, as amended at 81 FR 55553, Aug. 19, 2016]
### §554. Smuggling goods from the United States

(a) In General.—Whoever fraudulently or knowingly exports or sends from the United States, or attempts to export or send from the United States, any merchandise, article, or object contrary to any law or regulation of the United States, or receives, conceals, buys, sells, or in any manner facilitates the transportation, concealment, or sale of such merchandise, article or object, prior to exportation, knowing the same to be intended for exportation contrary to any law or regulation of the United States, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.

(b) Definition.—In this section, the term "United States" has the meaning given that term in section 545.

(Added Pub. L. 109–177, title III, §311(a), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 242.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 554 was renumbered section 555 of this title.
---

CERTIFICATION OF
  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Boschert, Chief Financial Officer of Balsam Ventures,
  Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                  

| | By:    | /s/ John Boschert      
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | JOHN BOSCHERT          
| |        |                        
| | Title: | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | November 13, 2003      

---
§ 607.14 How many applications for a development grant may an institution submit? In any fiscal year, an institution of higher education that meets the eligibility requirements under sections 311, 316, and 317 of the HEA may— ( a ) Submit an application for a development grant authorized under sections 311, 316, and 317 of the HEA; and
( b ) Be part of a cooperative arrangement application.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1057, 1069)
[59 FR 41924, Aug. 15, 1994, as amended at 64 FR 70155, Dec. 15, 1999; Redesignated at 85 FR 59981, Sept. 23, 2020]
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


     We hereby consent to the incorporation of our report dated January 11,
1996 appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ASHA Corporation for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 1995, in the following registration Statements
on Form S-8:

     SEC File No.             Name of Plan                 Date of Filing

      33-76908           1993 Stock Option Plan            March 25, 1994
      33-81688           Consulting Agreement Shares       July 18, 1994
      33-93678           1994 Stock Option Plan            June 20, 1995

                                     MCDIRMID, MIKKELSEN & SECREST, P.S.

                                     /s/ McDirmid, Mikkelsen & Secrest, P.S.
February 6, 1996
§ 30.1 What administrative actions may the Secretary take to collect a debt? ( a ) The Secretary may take one or more of the following actions to collect a debt owed to the United States: ( 1 ) Collect the debt under the procedures authorized in the regulations in this part.
( 2 ) Refer the debt to the General Accounting Office for collection.
( 3 ) Refer the debt to the Department of Justice for compromise, collection, or litigation.
( 4 ) Take any other action authorized by law.
( b ) In taking any of the actions listed in paragraph (a) of this section, the Secretary complies with the requirements of the Federal Claims Collection Standards (FCCS) at 4 CFR parts 101-105 that are not inconsistent with the requirements of this part.
( c ) The Secretary may— ( 1 ) Collect the debt under the offset procedures in subpart C of this part;
( 2 ) Report a debt to a consumer reporting agency under the procedures in subpart C of this part;
( 3 ) Charge interest on the debt as provided in the FCCS;
( 4 ) Impose upon a debtor a charge based on the costs of collection as determined under subpart E of this part;
( 5 ) Impose upon a debtor a penalty for failure to pay a debt when due under subpart E of this part;
( 6 ) Compromise a debt, or suspend or terminate collection of a debt, under subpart F of this part;
( 7 ) Take any other actions under the procedures of the FCCS in order to protect the United States Government's interests; or
( 8 ) Use any combination of the procedures listed in this paragraph (c) as may be appropriate in a particular case.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3(a)(1) and 1226a-1, 31 U.S.C. 3711(e))
[53 FR 33425, Aug. 30, 1988]
§ 462.42 How are tests used to place students at an NRS educational functioning level? ( a ) A local eligible provider must use the results of the pre-test described in § 462.41(b) to initially place students at the appropriate NRS educational functioning level.
( b ) A local eligible provider must use the results of the post-test described in § 462.41(c)— ( 1 ) To determine whether students have completed one or more educational functioning levels or are progressing within the same level; and
( 2 ) To place students at the appropriate NRS educational functioning level.
( c ) ( 1 ) States and local eligible providers are not required to use all of the skill areas described in the NRS educational functioning levels to place students.
( 2 ) States and local eligible providers must test and report on the skill areas most relevant to the students' needs and to the programs' curriculum.
( d ) ( 1 ) If a State's assessment policy requires a local eligible provider to test a student in multiple skill areas and the student will receive instruction in all of the skill areas, the local eligible provider must place the student in an educational functioning level that is equivalent to the student's lowest test score for any of the skill areas tested under § 462.41(b) and (c).
( 2 ) If a State's assessment policy requires a local eligible provider to test a student in multiple skill areas, but the student will receive instruction in fewer than all of the skill areas, the local eligible provider must place the student in an educational functioning level that is equivalent to the student's lowest test score for any of the skill areas— ( i ) Tested under § 462.41(b) and (c); and
( ii ) In which the student will receive instruction.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1830-0027) (Authority: 29 U.S.C. 3292)
[73 FR 2315, Jan. 14, 2008, as amended at 81 FR 55553, Aug. 19, 2016]
§ 663.30 What are an institution's responsibilities after the award of a grant? ( a ) An institution to which the Secretary awards a grant under this part is responsible for administering the grant in accordance with the regulations described in § 663.6.
( b ) The institution is responsible for processing individual applications for fellowships in accordance with procedures described in § 663.11.
( c ) The institution is responsible for disbursing funds in accordance with procedures described in § 663.4.
( d ) The Secretary awards the institution an administrative allowance of $100 for each fellowship listed in the grant award document.
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6), 2454(e)(1))
### §40A. Operation of unauthorized unmanned aircraft over wildfires

(a) In General.—Except as provided in subsection (b), an individual who operates an unmanned aircraft and knowingly or recklessly interferes with a wildfire suppression, or law enforcement or emergency response efforts 1 related to a wildfire suppression, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for not more than 2 years, or both.

(b) Exceptions.—This section does not apply to the operation of an unmanned aircraft conducted by a unit or agency of the United States Government or of a State, tribal, or local government (including any individual conducting such operation pursuant to a contract or other agreement entered into with the unit or agency) for the purpose of protecting the public safety and welfare, including firefighting, law enforcement, or emergency response.

(c) Definitions.—In this section, the following definitions apply:

(1) Unmanned aircraft.—The term "unmanned aircraft" has the meaning given the term in section 44801 of title 49, United States Code.

(2) Wildfire.—The term "wildfire" has the meaning given that term in section 2 of the Emergency Wildfire Suppression Act (42 U.S.C. 1856m).

(3) Wildfire suppression.—The term "wildfire suppression" means an effort to contain, extinguish, or suppress a wildfire.

(Added Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, §382(a), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3320.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "effort".
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 759

 710

 708

 650

 658

 652

 653

 716

 646

 708

 709

 712

 656

 684

 659

 694

 691

 694

 655

 729

 766

 756

 751

 679

 662

 646

 651

 690

 704

 698

 702

 686

 661

 630

 602

 639

 629

 627

 631

 584

 640

 624

 596

 599

 565

 537

 533

 518

 538

 584

 587

 536

 460

 450

 423

 419

 392

 392

 423

 487

 492

 483

 727

 688

 662

 643

 648

 642

 639

 677

 615

 667

 666

 651

 628

 638

 591

 618

 606

 622

 619

 667

 680

 609

 593

 578

 552

 495

 512

 543

 597

 619

 631

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 10, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 465

 441

 425

 413

 416

 413

 411

 434

 396

 428

 428

 418

 404

 410

 381

 398

 391

 400

 399

 428

 436

 392

 382

 373

 357

 322

 332

 352

 385

 399

 406

TOTAL 19,323

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
#### § 341.4 Surrender of immigration documents.

Each claimant shall surrender any immigration identification and permanent resident cards in his or her possession.

[30 FR 5472, Apr. 16, 1965, as amended at 63 FR 70316, Dec. 21, 1998]