Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 17339 

PART 529—CERTAIN OTHER DOSAGE 

FORM NEW ANIMAL DRUGS 

■ 21. The authority citation for 21 CFR 

part 529 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b. 

§ 529.50 [Redesignated as § 529.56 and 

Amended] 

■ 22. Redesignate § 529.50 as § 529.56 

and revise it to read as follows: 

§ 529.56 Amikacin. 

(a) Specifications. Each milliliter (mL) 

of solution contains 250 milligrams of 

amikacin as amikacin sulfate. 

(b) Sponsors. See Nos. 000856 and 

059130 in § 510.600(c) of this chapter. 

(c) Conditions of use in horses—(1) 

Amount. Administer 2 grams (8 mL) 

diluted with 200 mL of sterile 

physiological saline by intrauterine 

infusion daily for 3 consecutive days. 

(2) Indications for use. For treating 

genital tract infections (endometritis, 

metritis, and pyometra) in mares caused 

by susceptible organisms including 

Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas spp., 

and Klebsiella spp. 

(3) Limitations. Do not use in horses 

intended for human consumption. 

Federal law restricts this drug to use by 

or on the order of a licensed 

veterinarian. 

■ 23. In § 529.1030, revise paragraphs 

(d)(1)(i) and (d)(1)(iv) to read as follows: 

§ 529.1030 Formalin. 

* * * * * 

(d) * * * 

(1) * * * 

(i) Select finfish. For control of 

external protozoa Ichthyophthirius spp., 

Chilodonella spp., Ichthyobodo spp., 

Ambiphrya spp., Epistylis spp., and 

Trichodina spp., and monogenetic 

trematodes Cleidodiscus spp., 

Gyrodactylus spp., and Dactylogyrus 

spp., on salmon, trout, catfish, 

largemouth bass, and bluegill. 

* * * * * 

(iv) All finfish. For control of external 

protozoa Ichthyophthirius spp., 

Chilodonella spp., Ichthyobodo spp., 

Ambiphrya spp., Epistylis spp., and 

Trichodina spp., and monogenetic 

trematodes Cleidodiscus spp., 

Gyrodactylus spp., and Dactylogyrus 

spp. 

* * * * * 

Dated: March 23, 2011. 

Leslie Kux, 

Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7313 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 100 

[Docket No. USCG–2009–0996] 

RIN 1625–AA08 

Special Local Regulation; Hydroplane 

Races Within the Captain of the Port 

Puget Sound Area of Responsibility 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is 

establishing a special local regulation to 

restrict vessel movement in designated 

permanent hydroplane race areas in 

Dyes Inlet, Lake Washington and Lake 

Sammamish, WA during permitted 

hydroplane race events. When this 

special local regulation is activated, and 

thus subject to enforcement, this rule 

will limit the movement of nonparticipating vessels within the 

regulated race areas immediately prior 

to, during and immediately following 

the conclusion of permitted hydroplane 

marine events. This rule is needed to 

provide effective control over these 

events while ensuring the safety of the 

maritime public. 

DATES: This rule is effective March 29, 

2011. 

ADDRESSES: Comments and material 

received from the public, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, are part 

of docket USCG–2009–0996 and are 

available online by going to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG– 

2009–0996 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box, and 

then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ This material is 

also available for inspection or copying 

at the Docket Management Facility (M– 

30), U.S. Department of Transportation, 

West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this rule, call or 

e-mail LTJG Ashley M. Wanzer, 

Waterways Management, Sector Puget 

Sound, Coast Guard; telephone 206– 

217–6175, e-mail 

SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil. If 

you have questions on viewing the 

docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program 

Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 

202–366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Regulatory Information 

On Tuesday, January 19, 2010, we 

published a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) entitled Safety 

Zone Regulation; Hydroplane Races 

within the Captain of the Port Puget 

Sound Area of Responsibility in the 

Federal Register (75 FR 2833). On 

Wednesday, January 19, 2011, we 

published a supplemental notice of 

proposed rulemaking (SNPRM), revising 

the rulemaking to create a special local 

regulation designating three permanent 

hydroplane race areas under 33 CFR 

part 100 in the Federal Register (76 FR 

3057). We did not receive any 

comments on the NPRM or SNPRM and 

did not receive any requests for a public 

meeting. A public meeting was not held. 

Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast 

Guard finds that good cause exists for 

making this rule effective less than 30 

days after publication in the Federal 

Register. Immediate action is necessary 

to protect life, property and the 

environment; therefore, a 30-day notice 

is impracticable. Delaying the effective 

date would be contrary to the intended 

objective of promoting safety during 

these permitted events because the 

ULHRA Spring Training takes place on 

21 April 2011 in the Lake Washington 

designated race area and this is less than 

30 days after publication in the Federal 

Register. 

Basis and Purpose 

The U.S. Coast Guard is establishing 

special local regulations to establish 

three permanent designated hydroplane 

race areas in Dyes Inlet, Lake 

Washington, and Lake Sammamish, WA 

within the Captain of the Port, Puget 

Sound Area of Responsibility. This 

action is necessary in order to restrict 

vessel movement in the vicinity of the 

race courses thereby promoting safety 

on navigable waters during these events. 

Background 

The Coast Guard receives numerous 

marine event permits for hydroplane 

races taking place on the waterways of 

Dyes Inlet, Lake Washington, and Lake 

Sammamish, WA. This rule establishes 

a special local regulation to restrict 

vessel movement in designated 

hydroplane race areas during permitted 

hydroplane marine events. This rule 

enables event sponsors and the Coast 

Guard to adequately provide safety in 

support of these marine events. 

Initial Enforcement 

The Coast Guard will enforce the 

special local regulation for Lake 

Washington in 33 CFR 100.1308 from 

10 a.m. until 4 p.m. on April 21, 2011. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
17340 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

Discussion of Comments and Changes 

The notice of proposed rulemaking 

and supplemental notice of proposed 

rulemaking for this rule did not receive 

any comments. 

Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on 13 of these statutes or 

executive orders. 

Regulatory Planning and Review 

This rule is not a significant 

regulatory action under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review, and does not 

require an assessment of potential costs 

and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that 

Order. The Office of Management and 

Budget has not reviewed it under that 

Order. 

Small Entities 

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

whether this rule would have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises 

small businesses, not-for-profit 

organizations that are independently 

owned and operated and are not 

dominant in their fields, and 

governmental jurisdictions with 

populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

This rule will affect the following 

small entities: The owners or operators 

of vessels intending to transit or anchor 

within these designated hydroplane race 

areas while enforced on the waters of 

northern Dyes Inlet, Lake Washington, 

and Lake Sammamish, Washington. 

This proposed rule will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

because it is small in size and short in 

duration. The only vessels likely to be 

impacted will be recreational boaters. 

Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

in the NPRM we offered to assist small 

entities in understanding the rule so 

that they could better evaluate its effects 

on them and participate in the 

rulemaking process. 

Small businesses may send comments 

on the actions of Federal employees 

who enforce, or otherwise determine 

compliance with, Federal regulations to 

the Small Business and Agriculture 

Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman 

and the Regional Small Business 

Regulatory Fairness Boards. The 

Ombudsman evaluates these actions 

annually and rates each agency’s 

responsiveness to small business. If you 

wish to comment on actions by 

employees of the Coast Guard, call 

1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). 

The Coast Guard will not retaliate 

against small entities that question or 

complain about this rule or any policy 

or action of the Coast Guard. 

Collection of Information 

This rule calls for no new collection 

of information under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 

3520). 

Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on State or local governments and 

would either preempt State law or 

impose a substantial direct cost of 

compliance on them. We have analyzed 

this rule under that Order and have 

determined that it does not have 

implications for federalism. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or Tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this rule 

will not result in such an expenditure, 

we do discuss the effects of this rule 

elsewhere in this preamble. 

Taking of Private Property 

This rule will not cause a taking of 

private property or otherwise have 

taking implications under Executive 

Order 12630, Governmental Actions and 

Interference with Constitutionally 

Protected Property Rights. 

Civil Justice Reform 

This rule meets applicable standards 

in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive 

Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to 

minimize litigation, eliminate 

ambiguity, and reduce burden. 

Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Executive Order 13045, Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not 

an economically significant rule and 

does not create an environmental risk to 

health or risk to safety that may 

disproportionately affect children. 

Indian Tribal Governments 

This rule does not have Tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

Tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian Tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian Tribes. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This rule does not use technical 

standards. Therefore, we did not 

consider the use of voluntary consensus 

standards. 

Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Management Directive 023–01 and 

Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 

which guide the Coast Guard in 

complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 17341 

have concluded this action is one of a 

category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule is categorically 

excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph 

(34)(h), of the Instruction. This rule 

involves a special local regulation to 

establish vessel movement restrictions 

in designated race areas immediately 

prior to, during and immediately 

following permitted hydroplane race 

events. An environmental analysis 

checklist and a categorical exclusion 

determination are available in the 

docket where indicated under 

ADDRESSES. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100 

Marine safety, Navigation (water). 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 100 as follows: 

PART 100—REGATTAS AND MARINE 

PARADES 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 100 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233. 

■ 2. Add § 100.1308 to read as follows: 

§ 100.1308 Special Local Regulation; 

Hydroplane Races within the Captain of the 

Port Puget Sound Area of Responsibility. 

(a) Location. The following areas are 

designated race areas for the purpose of 

reoccurring hydroplane races: 

(1) Dyes Inlet. West of Port Orchard, 

WA to include all waters north to land 

from a line connecting the following 

points 47°37.36′ N, 122°42.29′ W and 

47°37.74′ N, 122°40.64′ W (NAD 1983). 

(2) Lake Washington. South of the 

Interstate 90 bridge and north of 

Andrew’s Bay to include all waters east 

of the shoreline within the following 

points: 47°34.15′ N, 122°16.40′ W; 

47°34.31′ N, 122°15.96′ W; 47°35.18′ N, 

122°16.31′ W; 47°35.00′ N, 122°16.71′ W 

(NAD 1983). 

(3) Lake Sammamish. South to land 

from a line connecting the following 

points 47°33.810′ N, 122°04.810′ W and 

47°33.810′ N, 122° 03.674′ W (NAD 

1983). 

(b) Notice of enforcement or 

suspension of enforcement. This special 

local regulation will be activated and 

thus subject to enforcement, under the 

following conditions: the Coast Guard 

must receive and approve a marine 

event permit for each hydroplane event 

in accordance with 33 CFR 100. The 

Captain of the Port will provide notice 

of the enforcement of this special local 

regulation by all appropriate means to 

ensure the widest dissemination among 

the affected segments of the public, as 

practicable; such means of notification 

may include but are not limited to, 

Broadcast Notice to Mariners or Local 

Notice to Mariners. 

(c) Regulations. (1) When this special 

local regulation is enforced, nonparticipant vessels are prohibited from 

entering the designated race areas 

unless authorized by the designated onscene Patrol Commander. Spectator craft 

may remain in designated spectator 

areas but must follow the directions of 

the designated on-scene Patrol 

Commander. The event sponsor may 

also function as the designated on-scene 

Patrol Commander. Spectator craft 

entering, exiting or moving within the 

spectator area must operate at speeds 

which will create a minimum wake. 

(2) Emergency signaling. A succession 

of sharp, short signals by whistle or 

horn from vessels patrolling the areas 

under the discretion of the designated 

on-scene Patrol Commander shall serve 

as a signal to stop. Vessels signaled shall 

stop and shall comply with the orders 

of the patrol vessel. Failure to do so may 

result in expulsion from the area, 

citation for failure to comply, or both. 

Dated: March 3, 2011. 

A.T. Ewalt, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting District 

Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7284 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 117 

Drawbridge Operation Regulations; 

Columbia River, OR 

CFR Correction 

In Title 33 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations, Parts 1 to 124, revised as of 

July 1, 2010, on page 624, in § 117.869, 

paragraph (d) is removed. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7441 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Forest Service 

36 CFR Part 294 

Idaho Roadless Rule 

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. 

ACTION: Final administrative correction. 

SUMMARY: The Forest Service, U.S. 

Department of Agriculture (USDA), is 

issuing administrative corrections 

affecting Big Creek Fringe, French 

Creek, Placer Creek, Secesh, and Smith 

Creek Idaho Roadless Areas on the 

Payette National Forest. These 

corrections remedy clerical errors 

relating to regulatory classifications 

involving two Forest Plan Special Areas 

(Big Creek and French Creek) and a 

mapping error. These corrections are 

made pursuant to 36 CFR 294.27(a). 

DATES: This correction is effective 

March 29, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Idaho Roadless Coordinator Joan 

Dickerson at 406–329–3314. Additional 

information concerning these 

administrative corrections, including 

the corrected maps, may be obtained on 

the Internet at http://roadless.fs.fed.us. 

Individuals who use telecommunication 

devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the 

Federal Information Relay Service 

(FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 between 

8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard 

Time, Monday through Friday. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Idaho 

Roadless Rule authorizes administrative 

corrections to the maps of lands 

identified in 36 CFR 294.22(c), 

including but not limited to, adjustment 

that remedy clerical errors, 

typographical errors, mapping errors, or 

improvements in mapping technology. 

The Chief may issue administrative 

corrections after a 30-day public notice 

and opportunity to comment. 

The Agency presented the corrections 

to the State of Idaho’s Roadless Rule 

Advisory Commission on September 28, 

2010. The Commission recommended to 

the Governor of Idaho that the 

corrections be made and that the 

Agency contact the Valley County 

Commissioners. The Valley County 

Commissioners supported the 

corrections. 

The Agency requested comment and/ 

or met with the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes 

of Duck Valley, the Shoshone-Bannock 

Tribes of Fort Hall, and the Nez Perce 

Tribe. No comments or concerns from 

the Tribes were received. 

Consideration of Comments 

The Chief provided a 30-day public 

notice and opportunity to comment (75 

FR 54542). A total of 13 comments were 

received from 9 individuals. 

Two respondents were concerned 

about the original classification of lands 

in the Big Creek Fringe, Placer Creek, 

Secesh and French Creek Roadless 

Areas. In addition these respondents 

were concerned about the original 

mapping of these roadless areas and felt 

the boundaries of the roadless areas 

should be modified to exclude existing 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1