alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §642. Tools and materials for counterfeiting purposes

Whoever, without authority from the United States, secretes within, or embezzles, or takes and carries away from any building, room, office, apartment, vault, safe, or other place where the same is kept, used, employed, placed, lodged, or deposited by authority of the United States, any tool, implement, or thing used or fitted to be used in stamping or printing, or in making some other tool or implement used or fitted to be used in stamping or printing any kind or description of bond, bill, note, certificate, coupon, postage stamp, revenue stamp, fractional currency note, or other paper, instrument, obligation, device, or document, authorized by law to be printed, stamped, sealed, prepared, issued, uttered, or put in circulation on behalf of the United States; or

Whoever, without such authority, so secretes, embezzles, or takes and carries away any paper, parchment, or other material prepared and intended to be used in the making of any such papers, instruments, obligations, devices, or documents; or

Whoever, without such authority, so secretes, embezzles, or takes and carries away any paper, parchment, or other material printed or stamped, in whole or part, and intended to be prepared, issued, or put in circulation on behalf of the United States as one of such papers, instruments, or obligations, or printed or stamped, in whole or part, in the similitude of any such paper, instrument, or obligation, whether intended to issue or put the same in circulation or not—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 725; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §269 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §155, 35 Stat. 1117).

Words "bed piece, bed-plate, roll, plate, die, seal, type, or other" were omitted as covered by "tool, implement, or thing."

Minor changes in phraseology were made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000" in last par.
#### § 812.1 Purpose.

The Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia (“CSOSA”) cooperates with other federal agencies to ensure that DNA samples from offenders are appropriately furnished to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) for DNA analysis. The results of the DNA analyses are to be included in the Combined DNA Index System (“CODIS”).
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Richmond Division 

In re: 

OMEGA W. WILSON, Case No. 18-32653-KLP 

 Chapter 13 

 Debtor. 

Order Setting Hearing 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a hearing will be held at: 

Judge Phillips’ Courtroom – U.S. Bankruptcy Court, 701 East Broad Street, Room 5100, 

Richmond, VA 23219 

Date: JULY 3, 2018 

Time: 10:00 AM 

for the Court to determine why the above-captioned case should not be dismissed due to the 

debtor’s / debtors’ failure to: 

file a certificate of credit counseling from an approved agency; file certificate about a financial 

management course and to file documents required by Local Bankruptcy Rule 1007-1 and/or 

1007-3 and 3015-2. 

**Missing Document(s): All Schedules and Statement of Financial Affairs; Summary of Your 

Assets and Liabilities and Certain Statistical Information; Statement of Your Current Monthly 

Income and Calculation of Commitment Period; Chapter 13 Plan 

Date: June 20, 2018 /s/ Keith L. Phillips 

 United States Bankruptcy Judge 

Copies to: 

Debtor 

Attorney for Debtor, if applicable 

Trustee 

United States Trustee 

Entered on Docket: June 20, 2018

Case 18-32653-KLP Doc 17 Filed 06/20/18 Entered 06/20/18 12:27:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5062 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5062

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 9930 Conroy Windermere Road in Windermere, Florida, as the ``Officer 
                 Robert German Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OFFICER ROBERT GERMAN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 9930 Conroy Windermere Road in Windermere, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Officer Robert German Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Officer 
Robert German Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 14, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5062

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 9930 Conroy Windermere Road in Windermere, Florida, as the ``Officer 
                 Robert German Post Office Building''.
```
[No. 8381.

Department One.

January 21, 1910.]

#### Edwin Howard *et al., Appellants,*v. The City of Tacoma *et al.,*Respondents.1

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J., entered June 11, 1909.

Affirmed.

*Boyle, Warhurton & Broolcway,*for appellants.

*T. L. Stiles, Frank R. Baker,*and *F. A. Latcham,*for respondent City of Tacoma.

*JB. H. Field*and *Geo. W. Forte,*for respondent Chicago, Milwaukee *&*St. Paul R. Co.

1

Reported in 106 Pac. 481.

Pee Curiam.

This case, except that a different piece of land is involved, is almost identical in its facts with, and is governed by the rule announced in *Ettor v. Tacoma, ante*p. 50, 106 Pac. 478. Upon the authority of that case, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

On Petition for Rehearing.2

[Decided March 26, 1910.]

Per Curiam.

The petition for rehearing in this case is denied on the authority of the decision this day filed in the case of *Ettor v. Tacoma, ante*p. 50, 107 Pac. 1061.

2

Reported in 107 Pac. 1064.
### §3004. Decorum in court room—(Rule)

#### See Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

Photographing or radio broadcasting prohibited, rule 53.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 814.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 579

 520

 484

 485

 495

 488

 514

 565

 570

 534

 542

 532

 500

 520

 527

 536

 504

 473

 543

 564

 645

 636

 626

 616

 592

 584

 552

 555

 547

 572

 542

 391

 360

 419

 370

 384

 379

 378

 388

 393

 383

 371

 370

 376

 376

 382

 393

 399

 393

 397

 412

 424

 428

 428

 444

 433

 444

 455

 461

 449

 457

 460

 448

 429

 465

 441

 453

 452

 450

 461

 457

 444

 436

 425

 422

 427

 437

 447

 443

 436

 451

 460

 481

 502

 513

 513

 503

 492

 495

 504

 496

 513

 511

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 9, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 293

 281

 303

 289

 296

 295

 294

 301

 298

 290

 285

 279

 277

 280

 286

 292

 290

 285

 295

 300

 313

 326

 333

 333

 327

 320

 322

 327

 323

 333

 332

TOTAL 14,407

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Beacon Power Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James M. Spiezio, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section. 1350,as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ James M. Spiezio    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| James M. Spiezio        |
| Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |
|                    |
| August 9, 2006          |

 

1

----
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 88777 / April 30, 2020

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-19511

In the Matter of

Leonardo Cornide and 

Jorge Falcon,

Respondents.

ORDER DIRECTING SECOND

PAYMENT OF CERTAIN FUNDS 

RECEIVED BY THE COMMISSION

On January 24, 2020, the Commission issued an Amended Order Instituting Cease-andDesist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Making 

Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order (the “Amended Order”)1that amended the 

order issued on September 25, 2019,2 which simultaneously instituted and settled a cease-anddesist proceeding against Leonardo Cornide (“Cornide”) and Jorge Falcon (“Falcon”) (together 

“Respondents”). These proceedings arise out of Respondents’ failure to disclose conflicts of 

interest while acting as investment advisers to Premier Assurance Group, SPC Ltd. (“PSPC”), a 

Cayman Islands-registered insurance company.

The Commission ordered Cornide to pay disgorgement of $2,786,925 plus accrued 

interest of $274,107.19, of which $655,350 was previously paid to PSPC; and Falcon to pay 

disgorgement of $4,390,278 plus accrued interest of $414,630.27, of which $920,349.82 was 

previously paid to PSPC. The remaining disgorgement and accrued interest was ordered to be 

paid in four installments, with such payments to be completed within 360 days of the entry of 

the Order. The Commission also ordered the Respondents to each pay a $100,000 civil money

penalty to the Commission, and created a Fair Fund, pursuant to Section 308(a) of the 

Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, so the penalties could be included with the disgorgement and 

accrued interest to be collected for distribution (the “Fair Fund”).

On February 7, 2020, the Commission directed the first payment received from the 

Respondents, pursuant to the payment plan detailed in the Amended Order, in the amount of 

$800,000 for a first tranche payment to PSPC.3

The Secretary has been granted authority to issue future orders directing payment of certain 

funds received by the Commission, upon the Commission’s receipt of any additional funds paid 

 

1 See Advisers Act Rel. No. 5366A (Jan. 24, 2020).

2 Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 

1940, Making Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order, Advisers Act Rel. No. 5366 (Sept. 25, 2019).

3

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 88144 (Feb. 7, 2020).
2

pursuant to the payment plan detailed in the Amended Order.

The Commission is in receipt of the second payment of $1,300,000.00 as detailed in the 

Amended Order.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Commission staff shall direct the second

payment of the $1,300,000.00 from the Fair Fund to PSPC.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman 

Secretary
```

[Federal Register: July 29, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 145)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 44720]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr29jy10-3]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

20 CFR Part 618

RIN 1205-AB56

 
Trade Adjustment Assistance; Merit Staffing of State 
Administration and Allocation of Training Funds to States; 
Clarification for the Rulemaking Record

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Final rule; clarification for the rulemaking record.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice provides, for the rulemaking record, information 
that was inadvertently omitted from the final rule in the Federal 
Register on April 2, 2010 (75 FR 16988) promulgating Trade Adjustment 
Assistance (TAA) regulations requiring States to use merit personnel 
systems in their administration of the TAA program, and prescribing a 
formula for allocating TAA training funds to the States.

DATES: Effective July 29, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin Fitzgerald, 202-693-3560; (this 
is not a toll-free number). TDD: 1-800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Employment and Training Administration 
(ETA) published a final rule in the Federal Register on April 2, 2010 
(75 FR 16988) promulgating Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) 
regulations requiring States to use merit personnel systems in their 
administration of the TAA program, and prescribing a formula for 
allocating TAA training funds to the States. This rule was effective 
May 3, 2010. This merit personnel system requirement is a condition for 
States receiving TAA funds as well as for State participation in the 
TAA program. OPM regulations (5 CFR 900.605) provide that, ``Federal 
agencies may adopt regulations that require the establishment of a 
merit personnel system as a condition for receiving Federal assistance 
or otherwise participating in an intergovernmental program only with 
the prior approval of the Office of Personnel Management.'' Because 
OPM's approval was not printed as part of the April 2, 2010 Federal 
Register notice, this notice clarifies for the record that OPM gave 
prior approval to the Department of Labor adopting these merit 
personnel system regulations for the TAA program.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of July 2010.
Jane Oates,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-18603 Filed 7-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```
#### Mabel B. Ryer, Appellant, v. Reno R. Billington, Respondent.

Order *903affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present —Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
Bureau of Land Managment (BLM) 

Bureau of Reclamation 

County / City Government 

Private 

State Lands 

Other Federal Lands 

US Forest Service (USFS) 

Water 

County Boundary 

Field Office / TPA Boundary 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
 

Bureau of Land Management
 

Butte Field Office
 

Draft RMP/EIS
 

Map 25: Upper Big Hole River 

Butte Travel Plan Route Designations 

Un 

Malta
 

Field Office
 

Missoula 

Field Office 

Lewistown 

Field Office 

Miles City 

Butte Field Office 

Field 

Office 

Billings 

Field Office 

Dillon 

Field Office 

Miles 

0 400 

Map shows proposed road management within the Upper Big Hole River 

Travel Planning Area under Alternative D. Under this alternative 26.8 

miles of road would be Open yearlong, 70.6 miles of road would be Open 

with various seasonal closures, 33.2 miles of road would be Closed 

yearlong, 6.6 miles of road would be Open for big game retrieval (open 

each day during hunting season from 11:00 AM to 3:00 PM), and 25.7 

miles of road would be Decommissioned.
§ 668.96 Reimbursements, refunds, and offsets. ( a ) In an action to fine an institution or servicer, or to limit, suspend, or terminate the participation of an institution or the eligibility of a servicer, the designated department official, hearing official, or Secretary may require an institution or third-party servicer to take reasonable and appropriate corrective action to remedy the institution's or servicer's violation, as applicable, of any statutory provision of or applicable to Title IV of the HEA, any regulatory provision prescribed under that statutory authority, or any applicable special arrangement, agreement, or limitation entered into under the authority of statutes applicable to Title IV of the HEA.
( b ) The corrective action under paragraph (a) of this section may include payment of any funds to the Secretary, or to designated recipients, that the institution or servicer, as applicable, improperly received, withheld, disbursed, or caused to be disbursed. Corrective action may, for example, relate to— ( 1 ) With respect to the Federal Stafford Loan, Federal PLUS, and Federal SLS programs— ( i ) Ineligible interest benefits, special allowances, or other claims paid by the Secretary; and
( ii ) Discounts, premiums, or excess interest paid in violation of 34 CFR part 682; and
( 2 ) With respect to all Title IV, HEA programs— ( i ) Refunds or returns of title IV, HEA program funds required under program regulations when a student withdraws.
( ii ) Any grants, work-study assistance, or loans made in violation of program regulations.
( c ) If any final decision in any action under this subpart requires an institution or third-party servicer to reimburse or make any other payment to the Secretary, the Secretary may offset these claims against any benefits or claims due to the institution or servicer.
( d ) If an institution's violation in paragraph (a) of this section results from an administrative, accounting, or recordkeeping error, and that error was not part of a pattern of error, and there is no evidence of fraud or misconduct related to the error, the Secretary permits the institution to correct or cure the error. If the institution corrects or cures the error, the Secretary does not limit, suspend, terminate, or fine the institution for that error.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1094 and 1099c-1)
[59 FR 22451, Apr. 29, 1994, as amended at 64 FR 58619, Oct. 29, 1999; 64 FR 59042, Nov. 1, 1999; Redsignated and amended at 82 FR 6257, 6259, Jan. 19, 2017]
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned herebycertifies, in his capacity as an officer of Watson Wyatt & Company Holdings(the “Company”), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of hisknowledge:

 

•                  The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

•                  The information contained in such reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operation of the Company.

 

Date: November 14, 2003

 
| /s/  Carl D. Mautz                          |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| Carl  D. Mautz                              |
| Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Watson Wyatt & CompanyHoldings and will be retained by Watson Wyatt & Company Holdings andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 01-1780

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

ALFRED SHARPTON,

Defendant, Appellant.

No. 01-1781

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

ADOLFO CARRIÓN,

Defendant, Appellant.

No. 01-1782

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

ROBERTO RAMÍREZ,

Defendant, Appellant.
No. 01-1783

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

JOSÉ RIVERA,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA

The opinion of this court, issued June 14, 2001,

should be amended as follows:

On page 9, footnote 6, delete the first paragraph and

insert the following paragraph in its place:

"The appellants further object that the district court

acted plainly unreasonably by ignoring differences between their

offense conduct and the offense conduct of defendants in the

proceedings of the prior day. Those defendants were arrested in

the live impact area of the base, and their protests, appellants

say, were therefore more disruptive. We do not find the uniform

treatment to be plainly unreasonable. The point is that the

district court's stated objective was to put an end to

protesters' taking the law into their own hands. There is

nothing plainly unreasonable about that objective. And that

objective does not require distinguishing among defendants

according to the particular manner in which they took the law

into their own hands."
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Charles A. Miracle, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Pacific Aerospace &
Electronics, Inc., a Washington corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

Date: August 21, 2003

/s/Charles A. Miracle
---------------------
CHARLES A. MIRACLE, CFO

                                      106