alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 222.43 What requirements must a local educational agency meet in order to be eligible for financial assistance under section 8003(b)(1)(F) due to unusual geographic features? An LEA is eligible for financial assistance under section 8003(b)(1)(F) if the Secretary determines that the LEA meets all of the following requirements— ( a ) ( 1 ) The LEA is eligible for a basic support payment under section 8003(b), including meeting the maintenance of effort requirements in section 8003(g) of the Act;
( 2 ) The LEA timely applies for assistance under section 8003(b)(1)(F) and meets all other requirements of subparts A and C;
( 3 ) The LEA is meeting the tax rate requirement in § 222.68(c) and the other applicable requirements of §§ 222.68 through 222.72; and
( 4 ) The LEA is not in a State that takes the LEA's payment under section 8003(b)(1)(F) into account in an equalization program that qualifies under section 8009 of the Act.
( b ) ( 1 ) As part of its section 8003 application, the LEA indicates in writing that it wishes to apply for an “unusual geographic” payment and it will provide the Secretary with documentation upon request that demonstrates that the LEA is unable to provide a level of education equivalent to that provided by its generally comparable LEAs because— ( i ) The applicant's current expenditures are affected by unusual geographic factors; and
( ii ) As a result, those current expenditures are not reasonably comparable to the current expenditures of its generally comparable LEAs.
( 2 ) The LEA's documentation must include— ( i ) A specific description of the unusual geographic factors on which the applicant is basing its request for compensation under this section and objective data demonstrating that the applicant is more severely affected by the factors than any other LEA in its State;
( ii ) Objective data demonstrating the specific ways in which the unusual geographic factors affect the applicant's current expenditures so that they are not reasonably comparable to the current expenditures of its generally comparable LEAs;
( iii ) Objective data demonstrating the specific ways in which the unusual geographic factors prevent the applicant from providing a level of education equivalent to that provided by its generally comparable LEAs; and
( iv ) Any other information that the Secretary may require to make an eligibility determination under this section.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7703(b)(1)(F))
[80 FR 33165, June 11, 2015]
CMP-1 

Revised: May 16, 2005

Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District 

Supplemental Application Form 

Conservation Management Practices: ALFALFA 

Farm Name: CMP Plan Years: to 

Maximum Crop Acreage: 

Fallow Acreage Last Planted in Alfalfa: 

Land 

Preparation/ 

Cultivation 

Select at least one additional of the following CMPs. 

Note: 100% of the maximum crop acreage must be covered by the selected CMPs. 

 Cessation of activities during high winds, ac Multiple CMPs in another category 

 Chemigation/Fertigation, ac Night farming, ac 

 Combined operations, ac Non-tillage/chemical tillage, ac 

 Conservation irrigation, ac Soil moisture management 

 Equipment change/tech. improvements, ac Other (special approval reqd.), ac 

Please describe the specifics of the practice(s) chosen above: 

 

 

 

Harvest 

Select at least one of the following CMPs. 

Note: 100% of the maximum crop acreage must be covered by the selected CMPs. 

 Combined operations, ac Multiple CMPs in another category, ac 

 Equipment change/tech. improvements, ac Night harvesting, ac 

 Green chop, ac Shuttle system, ac 

 Large bales, ac Other (special approval reqd.), ac 

Please describe the specifics of the practice(s) chosen above: 

 

 

 

Other 

Select at least one of the following CMPs. 

Note: 100% of the maximum crop acreage must be covered by the selected CMPs. 

 Conservation tillage, ac Organic practices, ac 

 Cover crop, ac Surface roughening, ac 

 Fallowing land, ac Time of disturbance/planting ac

 Multiple CMPs in another category Other (special approval reqd.), ac 

Please describe the specifics of the practice(s) chosen above: 

 

 

 

CMP

1
#### Archibald A. Sichel, Respondent, v. Billy Rose’s Exposition Spectacles, Inc., Appellant.

No opinion. Present—• Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Martin, P. J., and Dore, J., dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 61 (Wednesday, March 30, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7424]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Meeting of the Land Between The Lakes Advisory Board

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Land Between The Lakes Advisory Board will hold a meeting 
on April 21, 2011. Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App 2. The meeting agenda will focus 
on existing Environmental Education programs and improving engagement 
with regional school groups. The meeting is open to the public. Written 
comments are invited and should be sent to William P. Lisowsky, Area 
Supervisor, Land Between The Lakes, 100 Van Morgan Drive, Golden Pond, 
KY, 42211 and must be received by April 14, 2011 in order for copies to 
be provided to the members for this meeting. Board members will review 
written comments received, and at their request, oral clarification may 
be requested for a future meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, April 21, 2011 from 9 a.m. to 
approximately 4 p.m. CST.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Kentucky Dam Village State 
Resort Park, 113 Administration Drive, Gilbertsville, KY 42044.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda L. Taylor, Advisory Board 
Liaison, Land Between The Lakes, 100 Van Morgan Drive, Golden Pond, KY 
42211, 270-924-2002. Individuals who use telecommunication devices for 
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 
1-800-877-8339. This service is available 7 days a week, 24 hours a 
day.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Board 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Board members.

    Dated: March 24, 2011.
William P. Lisowsky,
Area Supervisor, Land Between The Lakes.
[FR Doc. 2011-7424 Filed 3-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
#### Richardson Drug Company et al. v. Raymond Bros. & Company.

Filed October 18, 1899.

No. 8,983.

Conditional Sale of Merchandise: Future Purchases. The contract of conditional sale of merchandise involved herein construed, and *held*not to authorize the vendees to purchase new goods on the credit of the vendors. *Richardson Drug Go. v. Plummer,*56 Nehr., 523, followed.

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Tibbets, J,

*Reversed.*

*John P. Maulé,*for plaintiffs in error.

*George E. Hibner, contra.*

Norval, J.

An action was brought in the court below by Raymond Bros. & Co. against the Richardson Drug Company and the Lincoln Paint & Color Company, Thomas L. Teasdall, and Alice M. Teasdall to recover the purchase price of certain goods and merchandise sold by the plaintiffs to Thomas L. Teasdall. A dismissal was entered as to the Teasdalls, and a trial to the court terminated in a judgment against the other defendants in the sum of $217.96, who have prosecuted this error proceeding.

The defendants, against whom a recovery was had in the court below, being the owners of a stock of drugs in the city of Lincoln, on January 27, 1892, sold the same conditionally to the Teasdalls, the parties at the time entering into a written contract, a copy of which is set out in the opinion in *Richardson Drug Co. v. Teasdall,*59 Nebr., 150, filed herewith. The Teasdalls took possession of the goods under said contract and the business was thereafter carried on in the name of said Thomas L. Teasdall, by whom the goods in controversy herein were purchased. The trial court found that the Teasdalls, in *158making such purchase, were the agents of the Richardson Drug Company and the Lincoln Paint & Color Company, and that the goods were obtained for their benefit. This finding is now assailed. Aside from the written contract already mentioned, there is not a scintilla of evidence to sustain the finding. This instrument has at least three times been construed by this court as being a contract for the conditional sale of merchandise. See *Richardson Drug Co. v. Teasdall,*52 Nebr., 698; *Richardson Drug Co. v. Plummer,*56 Nebr., 523; *Richardson Drug Co. v. Teasdall,*59 Nebr., 150, herewith decided. The case under consideration is parallel with *Richardson Drug Co. v. Plummer,*56 Nebr., 523. In that case it was sought to recover from the Richardson Drug Company and the Lincoln Paint & Color Company the purchase price of goods sold theTeasdalls, under circumstances like these disclosed by the present record. The plaintiffs relied upon the contract of conditional sale to establish that the Teasdalls were the agents of the defendants. This court, in an opinion by Sullivan, J., held that said contract of conditional sale did not authorize the vendees to purchase new goods on the credit of the vendors, and that there was no basis for the judgment rendered against the latter. ' With the conclusion then reached we are content. The judgment of the district court herein is

Reversed.
#### In re: Evelyn KRAFT, Debtor,—Appellant, v. CAL-WESTERN RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION and Washington Mutual Bank, N.A., Appellees.

No. 01-55637. B.A.P. No. CC 00-1447-BMaP.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*596Submitted March 14, 2002.*

Decided May 13, 2002.

Before KOZINSKI and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and CEBULL,** District Judge.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Richard F. Cebull, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

After careful consideration of the record and briefs, we affirm the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel filed March 15, 2001, for the reasons given by the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in its memorandum decision.

AFFIRMED.

***

 xhiS disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Francesco Marinaro, an Infant, by Guiseppe Marinaro, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, *v.*Multi-Speed Shutter Company, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Coxxrt, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 15th day of January, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury for $2,000, and also from an order entered on the 16th day of January, 1913, denying a motion for a new trial in an action by an employee to recover damages, alleging negligence.

Per Curiam:

Upon careful consideration of this record we are satisfied that the verdict is against the weight of evidence. The plaintiff failed to establish that there was any defect in the machine; that he was not properly instructed, and that the accident was caused by any actionable negligence upon the part of the defendant. Upon the evidence it woxild appear that it was physically impossible for the upper die to fall, as claimed by him, leaving it fairly inferable that he himself caused it to descend by pressure upon the treadle. The judgment and order appealed from are, therefore, reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Judgment and order reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event. Order to'be settled on notice.
### §698i. Administration of Big Cypress Preserve; applicability of other laws; rules and regulations for use of lands and waters; transportation facilities; consultation and cooperation with Secretary of Transportation

(a) The area within the boundaries depicted on the map referred to in section 698f of this title shall be known as the Big Cypress National Preserve. Such lands shall be administered by the Secretary as a unit of the National Park System in a manner which will assure their natural and ecological integrity in perpetuity in accordance with the provisions of sections 698f to 698m–4 of this title and with the provisions of the Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535; 16 U.S.C. 1–4),1 as amended and supplemented.

(b) In administering the preserve, the Secretary shall develop and publish in the Federal Register such rules and regulations as he deems necessary and appropriate to limit or control the use of Federal lands and waters with respect to:

(1) motorized vehicles,

(2) exploration for and extraction of oil, gas, and other minerals,

(3) grazing,

(4) draining or constructing of works or structures which alter the natural water courses,

(5) agriculture,

(6) hunting, fishing, and trapping,

(7) new construction of any kind, and

(8) such other uses as the Secretary determines must be limited or controlled in order to carry out the purposes of sections 698f to 698m–4 of this title: Provided, That the Secretary shall consult and cooperate with the Secretary of Transportation to assure that necessary transportation facilities shall be located within existing or reasonably expanded rights-of-way and constructed within the reserve 2 in a manner consistent with the purposes of sections 698f to 698m–4 of this title.

(Pub. L. 93–440, §4, Oct. 11, 1974, 88 Stat. 1260.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535; 16 U.S.C. 1–4), referred to in subsec. (a), is act Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, 39 Stat. 535, known as the National Park Service Organic Act, which enacted sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 100101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Sections 1 to 4 of the Act were repealed and restated as section 1865(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of Title 54 by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

1 See References in Text note below.

2 So in original. Probably should be "preserve".
#### Ulrike Sternberg and Others, Appellants, v. Louis Metzger & Company, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
(No. 6147

#### William A. Randolph, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 16, 1973.*

Jenner & Block, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*280Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard on the Joint Stipulation of the parties hereto, and the recommendation of Commissioner Joseph P. Griffin, and the Court being fully advised in the premises;

THIS COURT FINDS that this claim arises out of a construction contract dated on or about May 27,1966. The instant claim is for temporary steel sheet piling erected by the claimant as an incident to the contract between the claimant and the Department of Transportation, Division of Highways. On December 14,1972, at a hearing presided over by Commissioner Joseph P. Griffin, the parties answered ready for trial and at that time stipulated as to certain facts and made opening statements. Upon conclusion thereof the Commissioner recommended, and the parties agreed that the claimant was entitled to partial compensation for work performed. The parties agreed to settle the matter upon the recommendation and concurrence of the Commissioner.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the sum of $25,000.00 (TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS) be awarded to claimant in full satisfaction of any and all claims presented to the State of Illinois under the above captioned cause.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Department of Transportation pay out the retainage held by them in the normal and ordinary course of business.
### §3261. Criminal offenses committed by certain members of the Armed Forces and by persons employed by or accompanying the Armed Forces outside the United States

(a) Whoever engages in conduct outside the United States that would constitute an offense punishable by imprisonment for more than 1 year if the conduct had been engaged in within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States—

(1) while employed by or accompanying the Armed Forces outside the United States; or

(2) while a member of the Armed Forces subject to chapter 47 of title 10 (the Uniform Code of Military Justice),

shall be punished as provided for that offense.

(b) No prosecution may be commenced against a person under this section if a foreign government, in accordance with jurisdiction recognized by the United States, has prosecuted or is prosecuting such person for the conduct constituting such offense, except upon the approval of the Attorney General or the Deputy Attorney General (or a person acting in either such capacity), which function of approval may not be delegated.

(c) Nothing in this chapter may be construed to deprive a court-martial, military commission, provost court, or other military tribunal of concurrent jurisdiction with respect to offenders or offenses that by statute or by the law of war may be tried by a court-martial, military commission, provost court, or other military tribunal.

(d) No prosecution may be commenced against a member of the Armed Forces subject to chapter 47 of title 10 (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) under this section unless—

(1) such member ceases to be subject to such chapter; or

(2) an indictment or information charges that the member committed the offense with one or more other defendants, at least one of whom is not subject to such chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 106–523, §2(a), Nov. 22, 2000, 114 Stat. 2488.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 2000 Amendment

Pub. L. 106–523, §1, Nov. 22, 2000, 114 Stat. 2488, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act of 2000'."
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Boschert, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, President, Secretary and Treasurer of Balsam Ventures, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005, and to which this
      certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                              

| | By:    | /s/
      John Boschert                    
| | ------ | -------------------------------------------
| |        |                                            
| | Name:  | JOHN BOSCHERT                              
| |        |                                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial   
| |        | Officer, President, Secretary and Treasurer
| |        | (Principal Executive Officer and           
| |        | Principal Financial Officer)               
| |        |                                            
| | Date:  | November 21, 2005                          

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 886

 929

 948

 923

 935

 962

 1,003

 1,033

 972

 1,040

 1,103

 1,112

 1,044

 933

 1,012

 1,019

 872

 944

 961

 922

 843

 850

 852

 846

 864

 924

 1,145

 1,155

 1,167

 1,186

 1,058

 648

 820

 781

 754

 752

 672

 662

 663

 674

 740

 733

 772

 821

 774

 723

 882

 771

 876

 904

 818

 783

 803

 781

 802

 844

 867

 932

 940

 938

 1,063

 996

 785

 871

 880

 846

 858

 810

 843

 877

 803

 910

 924

 926

 935

 864

 894

 943

 816

 917

 947

 859

 811

 840

 811

 818

 851

 883

 1,034

 1,062

 1,030

 1,150

 1,016

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 18, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 501

 554

 560

 539

 546

 517

 537

 558

 512

 578

 587

 588

 594

 550

 568

 599

 520

 583

 601

 547

 517

 535

 517

 522

 542

 562

 655

 672

 653

 727

 644

TOTAL 27,814

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21