<PAGE>

                UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                  FORM 10-KSB/A
                                (Amendment No. 1)

[X]      ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
         EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

         For the Fiscal Year ended: SEPTEMBER 30, 2005

[ ]      TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
         EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

         For the Transition Period From ____ to ____

                        Commission File Number: 33-3378-D

                 SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.
                 ----------------------------------------------
             (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

           DELAWARE                                        51-0401125
(State or other jurisdiction of                        (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                        Identification No.)

                    6451-C EL CAMINO REAL, CARLSBAD, CA 92009
               (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

                                 (760) 918-1860
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

         Securities Company pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:        None

         Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:     None

         Check whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 12 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [ ]

         Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to
Item 405 of Regulation S-B is contained in this form, and no disclosure will be
contained to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB
or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [X]

         The issuer's revenues for the twelve months ended September 30, 2005
were $1,094,775.

         As of September 30, 2005 there are approximately 22,362,000 shares of
common voting stock of the Company held by non-affiliates having an aggregate
market value of $2,907,060.

         As of December 31, 2005, there were 69,787,460 shares of the Company's
Common Stock outstanding.

         Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one):
Yes [ ] No [X]

<PAGE>
                                EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-KSB/A amends certain portions of the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of Sub Surface Waste Management of Delaware, Inc.
("Registrant") for the year ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on January 18, 2006. In response to a request
from the Commission's Division of Corporation Finance, we have amended the
Officer's Certificates pursuant to Section 302 filed as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2
to comply with Item 601(B)(31) of Regulation S-B.

No other amendments have been made, and this Form 10-KSB/A does not reflect
events occurring after the filing of the original Annual Report or modify or
update those disclosures affected by subsequent events.

<TABLE>
<S>     <C>
                                     SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.

                                                       FORM 10-KSB

                                            For Year Ended September 30, 2005

                                                                                                                   Page
                                                                                                                   ----
                                                         PART I

Item 1.       Description of Business......................................................................           3

Item 2.       Description of Properties....................................................................          18

Item 3.       Legal Proceedings............................................................................          18

Item 4.       Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders..........................................          18

                                                         PART II

Item 5.       Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.....................................          19

Item 6.       Management Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation......................................          22

Item 7.       Financial Statements......................................................................... F-1 to F-29

Item 8.       Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures........          28

Item 8(a).    Controls and Procedures......................................................................          28

                                                        PART III

Item 9.       Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons; Compliance with
              Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act............................................................          29

Item 10.      Executive Compensation.......................................................................          32

Item 11.      Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management...............................          35

Item 12.      Certain Relationships and Related Transactions...............................................          37

Item 13.      Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.............................................................          38

Item 14.      Principal Accountant's Fees and Services.....................................................          39

                                                           2
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                                     PART I
                                     ------

ITEM 1.  DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

OVERVIEW

The company engages in developing, manufacturing and selling engineered
remediation solutions for clean up of toxic waste releases to soil and
groundwater and the bio-recycling of spent activated carbon filtration media.
The treatments may be made directly to the contaminated soil or groundwater in
the location at which the contamination was found ("in situ"), using wells and
subsurface injection/extraction points to administer the company's proprietary
microbial blends for bioremediation of various waste streams. Alternatively, the
treatments may require excavation of contaminated soil or pumping of groundwater
("ex situ"), and washing activated carbon filtration media with microbes to
Bio-recycle the filtration media. The company provides technical engineering
consultation and microbial blends as a subcontractor on projects or executes the
work directly as a primary contractor in connection with both ex-situ and in
situ processes. We also provide comprehensive civil and environmental
engineering project management services including specialists to design, permit,
build and operate environmental waste clean-up treatment systems using
conventional, biological and filtration technologies.

HISTORY

The company was incorporated under the laws of the state of Utah on January 30,
1986 and was re-domiciled in the State of Delaware in February 2001 under the
name of Covingham Capital Corporation ("Covingham"). Covingham was an inactive
publicly registered corporation with no significant assets or operations. On
December 20, 2002, Covingham entered into a Capital Stock Exchange Agreement
("Agreement") with the stockholders of Sub Surface Waste Management, Inc.
("SSWM"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of U.S. Microbics, Inc. organized under the
laws of the State of Nevada. Effective with the Agreement, all previously
outstanding common stock, preferred stock, options and warrants owned by SSWM
stockholders were exchanged for an aggregate of 10,774,000 shares of the
Covingham's common stock and 5,360,000 shares of the Covingham's Series A
Convertible Preferred stock.

Following the consummation of the Capital Stock Exchange Agreement, in December
2002, Covingham's name was changed to Sub Surface Waste Management of Delaware,
Inc.

INDUSTRY BACKGROUND

On December 11, 1980, Congress enacted the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act ("CERCLA"), commonly known as Superfund. This
law provided broad Federal authority to respond directly to releases or
threatened releases of hazardous substances that may endanger public health or
the environment. CERCLA established prohibitions and requirements concerning
closed and abandoned hazardous waste sites, provided for liability of persons
responsible for releases of hazardous waste at these sites, and established a
trust fund to provide for cleanup when no responsible party could be identified.

After the enactment of CERCLA, some states also began to regulate in the area of
environmental protection. Many states now have environmental protection
departments.

The purchase or management of contaminated industrial property can result in
staggering liability to the property owner or manager. Under Federal law, an
"owner" or "operator" of property is strictly liable for the release of any
hazardous substance on or under the property. Further, the current owner or
operator may be responsible for the cleanup of all previous contamination if it
did not investigate the existence of hazardous substances prior to the purchase.

Today, the remediation or cleanup of hazardous materials from the environment
represents a $50 billion service industry and is a part of the approximately
$205 billion spent annually in the U.S. for all environmental related products
and services (source Environmental Business Journal(R)). While the terms
"remediate" and "clean-up" are often applied interchangeably, they are defined
differently. "Remediation" is the removal or treatment of hazardous contaminants
to levels or standards imposed by regulatory agencies, which may neither restore
the site to "pristine" condition, nor to the condition existing prior to the
activities causing the contamination. The remediation levels or standards
established by regulatory agencies are primarily based upon health risk
assessments. These risk assessments analyze the danger to public health and
safety from various exposures to the contaminants discovered. The risks of
exposure, plus the severity of the exposure itself, are the principal factors in
determining the remediation standards. "Clean-up" of a site, however, achieves
levels of contamination at or below the detectable level required by regulatory
agencies. When this is possible, land use opportunities improve, thereby
enhancing the economic benefits to be derived from the property.

                                       3



<PAGE>

One of the methods used to remediate or clean-up toxic waste is bioremediation.
Bioremediation is a treatment process that uses naturally occurring
microorganisms, such as yeast, fungi or bacteria, to breakdown hazardous
substances into less toxic, or even non-toxic, substances. Bioremediation
technologies assist the growth of microorganisms and increase microbial
populations by creating optimum environmental conditions for them to detoxify
the maximum amount of contaminants. The specific type of bioremediation
technology used is determined by several factors, including the type of
microorganisms present, the site conditions, and the quantity and toxicity of
contaminant chemicals. Different microorganisms degrade different types of
compounds and survive under different conditions. Bioremediation treatments may
be in situ or ex situ. In situ bioremediation treats the contaminated soil or
groundwater in the location in which it was found. Ex situ bioremediation
processes require excavation of contaminated soil or pumping of groundwater
before treatment.

Bioremediation encompasses opportunities not only for the remediation or cleanup
of commercial and industrial sites, but of government sites as well.

MISSION

As of the end of the year 2004 the company refocused its attention to pursue new
work in Mexico to take advantage of the promulgation and enforcement of new
environmental regulations comparable to U.S. federal standards under a signed
treaty protocol of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Under these
regulations the company's proven and U.S. patented application technologies were
successfully registered with SEMARNAT (Secretary of the Environment) and its
enforcement agency PROFEPA (Mexico EPA). Under Mexico environmental regulations
contractors must employ SEMARNAT approved and registered technologies for the
remediation of toxic impacts and releases to the environment. The company seeks
to exploit its early entry and recognition into this newly created regulatory
driven cleanup market through its contract with a U.S. manufacturer in Torreon,
Mexico since 2004 providing environmental site assessment, engineering design
and subsequent remedial action plan for the above ground surface (ex-situ) a nd
below ground surface (in-situ) cleanup of petroleum hydrocarbon machine oil
releases whose work plan has been approved and followed by PROFEPA. In 2005 the
company decided to hire a reputable and proven marketing firm with a successful
track record in introducing U.S. based service technology companies into the
market in Mexico. Our goal is to establish a permanent source of project revenue
in Mexico capitalizing on early entry and securing sustaining revenues with
Federal and State clients through teaming arrangements and direct contracts.

REMEDIATION SERVICES AND PRODUCTS

The company provides engineered remediation solutions for cleanup of toxic waste
releases to soil and groundwater. To date, these services have been sold
principally in the United States. Treatment may be in situ, using wells and
subsurface injection/extraction points to administer the company's proprietary
microbial blends for bioremediation of various waste streams. The company also
provides ex situ treatment services using its Bio-Raptor system in conjunction
with its proprietary microbial blends, providing direct technical engineering
consultation as needed. The company also recently received a U.S. patent for its
Bio-GAC(tm) system as a cost effective liquid and vapor phase waste stream
treatment system for the removal of toxics such as petroleum hydrocarbons,
perchlorates and other volatile organic compounds.

The company also uses on some projects a unique collection of microbial cultures
developed over a thirty-year period and licensed to the company by XyclonyX, a
subsidiary of U.S. Microbics, Inc. The company uses these cultured specific
microbial blends to address specific identified wastes. The company's in-house
technicians work with an assigned Project Engineer to develop a site-specific
engineered-remedial solution that will meet or exceed regulatory agency
requirements.

Some of the past uses of the company's products and processes include, but are
not limited to, the following:

         o        In situ bioremediation of underground contaminants in soil and
                  groundwater;
         o        Ex situ bioremediation of contaminants;
         o        Bio-recycling of spent activated carbon filtration media; and
         o        Open-water (both fresh and marine) containment/treatment
                  bioremediation.

The company's remediation technologies meet the requirements of the various
industries as well as the EPA provision for application of naturally occurring
and non-genetically modified microbes. The XyclonyX microbial products have
received approval as "relatively safe" from the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
its highest rating.

                                       4



<PAGE>

         SALES AND MARKETING OF SERVICES
         -------------------------------

We market our products and services directly to private and governmental
clients, through sales agents and through joint venture partners utilizing
revenue sharing agreements. We are also a technology service provider to third
parties who have contracts with their own remediation clients.

         BIO-RAPTOR(TM)

Bio-Raptor(TM) is the company's patented ex-situ bioremediation treatment system
for cleaning up hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. The Bio-Raptor(TM) screens and
treats soil contamination on-site, thereby reducing costs, maximizing material
treatment surface area and aeration, reducing retention time, minimizing
potential liability through on-site treatment and eliminating contaminant
transportation-related risks and site downtime.

Bio-Raptor(TM) has high-throughputs of up to 500 tons per hour with larger and
smaller customized models engineered to fit specific site remediation
requirements. The company has signed a Technology License Agreement with an
affiliate, Xyclonyx, granting the company a sub-license to use products,
technical information and patent processes related to the Bio-Raptor(TM).

         BAC(TM) & BIO-GAC(TM)

BAC(TM) and BioGAC(TM) are our bio-recycling technologies used to reactivate or
extend the service life of on-line activated carbon filtration media used to
control toxic pollutant emissions from both air and water waste streams.
Examples include gasoline and diesel tank storage air filter systems and
industrial waste water filters that feed the publicly owned treatment system.

         PROPRIETARY MICROBIAL BLENDS

The company purchases microbial blends from West Coast Fermentation Center,
Inc., our Parent company's wholly owned subsidiary, which manufactures and uses
its own microbial blends for bioremediation purposes. Because of the high
quality of the microbial blends purchased from West Coast Fermentation Center,
Inc., and our desire to exercise a high degree of control and confidentiality
over the manufacturing process, the Company has not considered alternative
sources.

         MTBECTOMY(TM) - Formulated specifically to address the need for rapid
remediation of MTBE and its daughter products such as Tri Butyl Alcohol.
MTBEctomy(TM) is injected directly into impacted soil & groundwater resources to
bioremediate the gasoline fraction containing MTBE in situ for underground
leakage and cleanup of gasoline/fuel containment vessels (e.g. gasoline station
tanks, etc.). The company is currently the only licensee of this process for in
situ treatment of petroleum contamination.

         REMEDILINE(TM)-30XH - Formulated to deal effectively with the heavy,
tarry types of oils, coal tars, and organic sludges. This product is
particularly well suited for phenolic and other aromatic chemical structure
wastes. Usually the product of choice for coking and wood preserving wastes.

         REMEDILINE(TM)-30XFA - Biological above ground site remediation process
used on hydrocarbon contaminated soils.

The foregoing blends can also be customized, depending upon the waste stream to
be treated. Tougher waste streams require more expensive, customized blends and
the company can charge higher costs per ton for treatment.

TECHNOLOGY LICENSING

In special circumstances or where economic incentives exist for it to do so, the
company has licensed its technology and services. The company will continue to
license its technology and services as a core business strategy. The company is
actively seeking licensees in the European Union and in Latin America and East
Asia. As in the U.S., the company's technology can be licensed to property
developers, major oil companies, equipment manufacturers, toxic and hazardous
waste generators, and remediation companies.

In August 2004 the company's teaming partner Grupo Bartlett, S.A. de C.V.
secured a registration license for SSWM's licensed U.S. patented treatment
systems with SEMARNAT, the environmental protection agency of the federal
government of Mexico. This license allows the company through its teaming
partner to apply its technology solution for pollution cleanup contracts
throughout Mexico. Only registered license technologies can be used by
contractors in Mexico to address toxic cleanups approved by SEMARNAT. We believe
our license is one of the first five remediation technology systems approved.

                                       5



<PAGE>

MARKETS FOR REMEDIATION PRODUCTS

Many businesses generate contamination as a byproduct of their processes. For
example, the company estimates that there are approximately 17,000 active dry
cleaning facilities in the U.S. that contain some level of contamination. The
company estimates that conventional technology costs for cleanup range from
$100,000 to $2,000,000 per site. According to the United States Environmental
Protection Agency, biotechnology applications in soil and groundwater
contamination could save the dry cleaning industry up to 50% of the cost of
conventional treatment solutions and significantly shorten the cleanup time for
on-site treatment. The company's patented in-situ application of all-natural,
non-genetically engineered bacteria has successfully proven to remediate dry
cleaner solvents containing tetrachloroethene (PCE or PERC). In a One Hour
Martinizing(TM) site located in southeastern Michigan, during a period of
approximately 90 days the company's solution removed more than 60% of the
volatile organic compounds, commonly known as VOCs, detected in the soil prior
to treatment. Aside from removing the VOCs, the company's technology generated
non-detectable levels of vinyl chloride and methyl chloride during the
remediation processes. The company believes that this result is far superior to
conventional methods of remediation and cleanup.

Management believes that both large corporations and small, independent
entrepreneurs can benefit from the company's engineering services, proprietary
microbial products and patented treatment application processes for in situ and
ex situ clean up of environmental impacts to soil and groundwater and for
bio-recycling of spent activated carbon filtration media. Examples include:

         o        Major Oil Companies with impacts to surrounding soil and
                  groundwater from sudden and uncontrolled releases of petroleum
                  products at retail stations, terminals, pipelines, barges,
                  ships and refineries.
         o        Major Toxic and Hazardous Waste Treatment and Disposal
                  Companies with a desire to comply with existing permit
                  conditions and extend the actual or potential life of present
                  storage and treatment sites and facilities through on-site
                  remediation of stored waste-streams and control of nuisance
                  odors.
         o        Manufacturers with Fixed Point Source Facilities such as
                  automotive, aerospace and electronic component manufacturers.
         o        Specialty Environmental Remediation Companies, which have not
                  been previously exploited (for example, hydrocarbon waste
                  stream treatment at the municipal waste treatment facility,
                  emergency cleanup response companies, open-water clean-up,
                  habitat restoration in environmentally sensitive locals,
                  etc.).
         o        Companies who want to Replace Existing, less Efficient
                  Treatment Technologies in their Respective Niche Markets, for
                  example, agricultural processors, paper and cellulose
                  waste-stream producers, golf courses, poultry, pork, beef, and
                  fish processors, and medical and hospitality waste-streams, to
                  reduce their environmental disposal problems.

The company's representative clients include, UNOCAL, BARMAC (Brown & Root,
McDermott), BP-ARCO, Chevron, Allied Waste Company, American Industrial
Manufacturing Services (Denso North America), the law firm of Pepper Hamilton,
LLP, Caratron Industries, Inc., Horsehead Industries, Signal Hill Petroleum,
Global Solutions, Inc. & Fletcher Oil Co., LLC, Hopkins Real Estate Group, The
Arthur Pearlman Group, One Hour Martinizing(TM), O. F. Mossburg & Sons, Applied
Technical Solutions, ATC Associates, Enviro-Sciences and S&ME Consulting
Engineers, ISE (InSinkErator), City of Chula Vista, CA, Whittaker Corporation,
MFG/Tetra Tech, Grupo Protexa de Mexico, Charles Taylor Consultants of Mexico
(Agents for Lloyd's of London Insurance Underwriters) and the South Carolina
Department of Health & Environmental Control.

COMPETITION

There are various methods that can be used to remediate soil. A comparison of
these methods and the advantages and disadvantages of each method is shown in
the table below.

<TABLE>
<S>     <C>
                                                  REMEDIATION METHODS

---------------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------------------- ------------------------------
          METHOD                   COSTS                         PRO                                CON
---------------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------------------- ------------------------------
COMPETITIVE METHODS:
---------------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------------------- ------------------------------
Thermal Desorbtion           o    $80-120 per ton   o    Soil with gasoline and light   o    Low temperature heat only
                                  (mobile                hydrocarbons.                       removes volatile
                                  treatment)                                                 constituents.
---------------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------------------- ------------------------------
Incineration                 o    $150-$400 per     o    At high temperatures, can      o    Expensive excavation.
                                  ton (mobile            sufficiently burn most         o    Can generate more
                                  incineration)          compounds.                          hazardous compounds.
                             o    $300-$1,000 per   o    Works for light and heavy      o    Projects can last many
                                  ton (fixed             hydrocarbons                        years.
                                  incineration)                                         o    Doesn't remediate heavy
                                                                                             fuels.
---------------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------------------- ------------------------------
Vapor Extraction             o    Well field        o    Works for light                o    Lengthy time frames.
                                  treatment,             hydrocarbons.                  o    Doesn't work for heavy
                                  depends on time   o    Can be inexpensive if               Bio-venting fuels such as
                                  in field, cost         concentrations are dilute.          diesel fuel.
                                  up to $150,000
                                  plus per acre
---------------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------------------- ------------------------------

                                                           6


<PAGE>

---------------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------------------- ------------------------------
Air Sparging                 o    Relies on         o    Works best for light           o    Lengthy time frames.
                                  bio-stimulation        hydrocarbons.                  o    Doesn't work for heavy
                                  to reach                                                   fuels.
                                  cleanup goals,                                        o    Treatment can take many
                                  cost up to                                                 years.
                                  $500,000 per                                          o    Expensive.
                                  acre                                                  o    Carbon Filters often
                                                                                             become obstructed.
---------------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------------------- ------------------------------
Pump and Treat with carbon   o    5 Gallons Per     o    Unobtrusive method.            o    Carbon Filters must be
                                  Minute (GPM),                                              recycled.
                                  $0.04-$0.06 per                                       o    Waste disposed in
                                  gallon                                                     traditional landfill.
---------------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------------------- ------------------------------
Landfill Disposal            o    $25-$100 per      o    Contamination no longer is     o    You are now legally
                                  ton plus tax,          on your property.                   responsible for the
                                  transportation                                             entire landfill.
                                  and licenses
---------------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------------------- ------------------------------
COMPANY'S METHODS:
---------------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------------------- ------------------------------
Bio-GAC(TM)                  o    5 GPM,            o    Can be inexpensive.            o    Depending on local
                                  $.025-.03 per                                              cleanup limit
                                  gallon                                                     regulations, i.e. TBA
                                                                                             from MTBE may require
                                                                                             more treatment time.
---------------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------------------- ------------------------------
Bio-augmentation             o    $15 to $100 per   o    Inexpensive.                   o    Lasts only up to several
                                  ton               o    Can remediate all                   months, but may remediate
                                                         contaminants.                       at the source.
                                                    o    Unobtrusive.
---------------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------------------- ------------------------------
</TABLE>

The company believes that it can establish a competitive edge in the
bioremediation market for two primary reasons. First, because the company is
majority-owned by a microorganism manufacturer, management believes that it can
favorably compete in pricing with any distributor or contractor. Most
microorganisms used in bioremediation are purchased from manufacturers by
distributors who sell to outside contractors. Each additional entity in the
distribution chain increases the cost of microorganism blends.

In addition, the company utilizes a "Pay-for-Performance" based billing concept
in order to make the project costs more attractive to clients. Instead of paying
for the company's services through with industry standard "Pay-for-Effort" or
time and material contracts and fixed unit price contracts, the
Pay-for-Performance method allows the client to pay for the remediation services
only when the site attains milestone interim and final closure approval by a
regulatory agency. The company's work for the South Carolina Department of
Health and Environmental Control's Leaking Underground Storage Tank Fund is the
nation's first such "pay for performance" contract program. Management believes
that the risk in entering into these contracts to regulatory agency closure will
be offset with higher profit margins that the company believes will be realized
as a result of the reduction in time and expense related to attaining site
closures via its aggressive bio-augmentation process supported by a captive
fermentation capability. Bioremediation is competitive in both time and cost
when compared with conventional pump and treat, thermal or landfill disposal
technology.

Second, because it has in-house engineering ability, the company is able to
execute remediation projects for its customers using these custom microbial
blends not available to competitors. The company licenses microbial cultures
from  U.S.

Microbics, Inc. The company has also licensed a patented processes and other
proprietary microbial products, unavailable to others, for a use on a wide range
of toxins. Management believes that these unique blends, high microorganism
counts, and extensive applications histories gives the company a competitive
edge over other providers of bioremediation services. In addition, in October
2004, the California Department of Toxic Substance Control approved the
company's work plan and it subsequently successfully demonstrated simultaneous
cleanup of soil contaminated with rocket propellant and various solvents at a
southern California site. Soil contamination from rocket propellant and various
solvents impacts the food and water supplies in several western States.

The company is also able to add a level of expertise that most microorganism
manufacturers and earth excavation contractors cannot provide. Most
microorganism manufacturers and earth excavation contractors have little or no
experienced environmental engineering services, and must rely on third party
technologists to prepare the appropriate application rates for the job at hand
and thereafter to successfully execute the work. Few earth excavation
contractors, if any, have patented treatment technology, bio-inoculation
specialty equipment, in-house integration of project engineering,
microbiological specialists or field application know-how and experience to
address both in situ and ex situ contamination problems.

                                       7



<PAGE>

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

The company sub-licenses two patents from XyclonyX, an affiliate of the company:
(1) a patent for a method of treating hydrocarbon spills, which was issued on
August 13, 1991; (2) a patent for a method of treating hydrocarbon
contaminated soil issued on August 2, 1994, and (3) a patent for treatment of
contaminated activated charcoal issued June 14, 2005

Our Chief Engineer Behzad Mirzayi, P.E., in conjunction with XyclonyX developed
the BAC(TM) and Bio-GAC(TM) carbon recycling technology and carbon treatment of
contaminated activated charcoal, for which a patent was filed on January 18,
2002 with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. In July 2004, we were notified
that the patent was granted. The patent was published on June 14, 2005, Patent
No.: US 6,905,603 B2. SSWM has completed a renewal of its sub-license agreement
with XyclonyX.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

During the past two years the company has done a minimal amount of basic
research and development amounting to less than $50,000 in each fiscal year. The
company plans to spend approximately $100,000 on research and development over
the next fiscal year, integrating its engineering services with historical
application research provided by George Robinson to incorporate new waste
treatments into its final engineering design for customer project work.

PARENT COMPANY

U.S. Microbics, Inc., our parent company owns 89.3% of our issued and
outstanding common stock. U.S. Microbics, Inc. also owns 80% of USM Capital
Group, Inc., which in turn owns 1 % of our issued and outstanding common
stock.

EMPLOYEES

As of September 30,2005 the company had 4 full-time employees. The company
utilizes certain administrative and executive personnel employed by our parent,
U.S. Microbics, Inc., to assist with its reporting, accounting and
administrative needs. In such cases, U.S. Microbics, Inc., charges the company a
proportional amount of the salary for any such employees. The company also makes
use of professionals on an as-needed basis. The company's employees are not
represented by a labor union and the company believes its employee relations are
good. The company shares space with U.S. Microbics, Inc., our parent company.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

We are subject to Federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the
use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of hazardous materials and
waste products. We are subject to various Federal, state and local laws
affecting advertising and representations made by businesses in the sale of
products and services, which apply to us. We are also subject to government laws
and regulations governing health, safety, working conditions, employee
relations, wrongful termination, wages, taxes and other matters applicable to
businesses in general.

To apply and use our bioremediation products and patented application processes
we are required to secure an approved site work plan from the lead regulatory
agency based upon a thorough site assessment that accurately defines the
complete vertical and horizontal extent of contamination using EPA approved test
methods by independent analytical laboratories to verify the data. The lead
regulatory agency will typically approve a site work plan within 30 days from
the date of its submission. The approved site work plan incorporates site
specific cleanup standards required to meet regulatory closure limits to secure
a no further action comment letter from the lead regulatory agency.

                                       8



<PAGE>

                                  RISK FACTORS

         AN INVESTMENT IN OUR COMMON SHARES INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK AND
IS SUBJECT TO MANY UNCERTAINTIES. THESE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES MAY ADVERSELY
AFFECT OUR BUSINESS, OPERATING RESULTS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION. OUR MOST
SIGNIFICANT RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES ARE DESCRIBED BELOW; HOWEVER, THEY ARE NOT
THE ONLY RISKS WE FACE. IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING RISKS ACTUALLY OCCUR, OUR
BUSINESS, FINANCIAL CONDITION, OR RESULTS OR OPERATIONS COULD BE MATERIALLY
ADVERSELY AFFECTED, THE TRADING OF OUR COMMON STOCK COULD DECLINE, AND YOU MAY
LOSE ALL OR PART OF YOUR INVESTMENT THEREIN. YOU SHOULD ACQUIRE SHARES OF OUR
COMMON STOCK ONLY IF YOU CAN AFFORD TO LOSE YOUR ENTIRE INVESTMENT. IN ORDER TO
ATTAIN AN APPRECIATION FOR THESE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES, YOU SHOULD READ THIS
ANNUAL REPORT IN ITS ENTIRETY AND CONSIDER ALL OF THE INFORMATION AND
ADVISEMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT, INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING RISK
FACTORS AND UNCERTAINTIES.

RISKS RELATING TO OUR BUSINESS

WE HAVE A LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY AND HAVE ACCUMULATED SIGNIFICANT LOSSES
SINCE OUR INCEPTION AND EXPECT LOSSES TO CONTINUE FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE.
NONE OF OUR PRODUCTS OR SERVICES ON THE MARKET CURRENTLY GENERATING SIGNIFICANT
REVENUES. OUR INABILITY TO GENERATE REVENUES AND PROFITS FROM OUR PRODUCTS AND
SERVICES COULD CAUSE US TO GO OUT OF BUSINESS AND FOR YOU TO LOSE YOUR ENTIRE
INVESTMENT.

We are a company engaged in developing and selling microbial technology and
engineering application expertise. We have yet to establish any history of
profitable operations. We have incurred annual operating losses of respectively,
during the past four fiscal years of operation. As a result, at September 30,
2005, we had an accumulated deficit of $11,742,075. We have incurred net losses
from continuing operations of $1,627,719 and $3,316,635 for the fiscal years
ending September 30, 2005 and September 30, 2004, respectively. Our revenues
have not been sufficient to sustain our operations. We expect that our revenues
will not be sufficient to sustain our operations for the foreseeable future. Our
profitability will require the successful commercialization of our products and
services. No assurances can be given when this will occur or that we will ever
be profitable. Our parent company, U.S. Microbics, Inc., has invested, and we
have relied on, approximately $7,300,000 in our operations to date, however we
will need to raise additional capital to continue as a going concern.

Our independent auditors have added an explanatory paragraph to their audit
opinion issued in connection with the financial statements for the year ended
September 30, 2005, relative to our ability to continue as a going concern. Note
M to our financial statements addressed management's plans to address the
working capital deficit. We cannot assure you that our business plans will be
successful in addressing these issues. If we cannot successfully continue as a
going concern, our shareholders may lose their entire investment in our common
shares. Our ability to obtain additional funding will determine our ability to
continue as a going concern. Our financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

OUR INABILITY TO RAISE ADDITIONAL WORKING CAPITAL AT ALL OR TO RAISE IT IN A
TIMELY MANNER WOULD NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR ABILITY TO FUND OUR OPERATIONS, TO
GENERATE REVENUES, AND TO OTHERWISE EXECUTE OUR BUSINESS PLAN, LEADING TO THE
REDUCTION OR SUSPENSION OF OUR OPERATIONS AND ULTIMATELY OUR GOING OUT OF
BUSINESS. SHOULD THIS OCCUR, THE VALUE OF YOUR INVESTMENT IN THE COMMON SHARES
COULD BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED, AND YOU COULD EVEN LOSE YOUR ENTIRE INVESTMENT.

We will most likely need to raise cash and additional working capital to cover
the anticipated shortfall in our cash and working capital until such time as we
become cash flow positive based solely on sales and service revenues less
operating and other costs. At September 30, 2005, we had a working capital of
$430,810. The independent auditor's report for the year ended September 30,
2005, includes an explanatory paragraph to their audit opinion stating that our
recurring losses from operations and working capital deficiency raise
substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We have an
operating cash flow deficit of $887,591, as of September 30, 2005, an operating
cash flow deficit of $664,605, as of June 30, 2005 and an operating cash flow
deficit of $1,251,172, for the year ended September 30, 2004. We do not
currently have sufficient financial resources to fund our operations or those of
our subsidiaries. Therefore, we need additional funds to continue these
operations.

On June 10, 2004, we entered into a common stock purchase agreement with Fusion
Capital Fund II, LLC, pursuant to which Fusion Capital has agreed to purchase up
to an aggregate, under certain conditions, of $6.0 million of our common stock.
We only have the right to receive $12,500 per trading day under the agreement
with Fusion Capital unless our stock price equals or exceeds $0.70, in which
case the daily amount may be increased under certain conditions as the price of
our common stock increases. Fusion Capital shall not have the right nor the

                                       9



<PAGE>

obligation to purchase any shares of our common stock on any trading days that
the market price of our common stock is less than $0.10. Assuming we sell
12,000,000 shares to Fusion Capital pursuant to the common stock purchase
agreement, the selling price of our common stock to Fusion Capital would have to
average at least $0.50 per share for us to receive the maximum proceeds of $6.0
million. Assuming we sell 12,000,000 shares to Fusion Capital pursuant to the
common stock purchase agreement at a purchase price of $0.21 per share (the
closing sale price of the common stock on January 6, 2005), proceeds to us would
only be $2,520,000, unless we choose to sell more than 12,000,000 shares, which
we have the right, but not the obligation, to do.

The extent we rely on Fusion Capital as a source of funding will depend on a
number of factors including, the prevailing market price of our common stock and
the extent to which we are able to secure working capital from other sources,
such as through the commercialization of our products and services. If obtaining
sufficient financing from Fusion Capital were to prove prohibitively expensive
and if we are unable to commercialize and sell our products and services, we
will need to secure another source of funding in order to satisfy our working
capital needs. Even if we are able to access the full $6.0 million under the
common stock purchase agreement with Fusion Capital, we may still need
additional capital to fully implement our business, operating and development
plans. Should the financing we require to sustain our working capital needs be
unavailable or prohibitively expensive when we require it, the consequences
would be a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial
condition and prospects.

OUR MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY HAS NOT GAINED FULL MARKET ACCEPTANCE, AS A RESULT WE
HAVE NOT GENERATED SIGNIFICANT REVENUES. IF OUR MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY DOES NOT
GAIN MARKET ACCEPTANCE OR GENERATE REVENUES, THE VALUE OF YOUR INVESTMENT IN THE
COMMON SHARES COULD BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED, AND YOU COULD EVEN LOSE YOUR ENTIRE
INVESTMENT.

Our microbial technology has not been fully utilized in any particular market.
Market acceptance of our products and services will depend in large part upon
our ability to demonstrate the technical and operational advantages and cost
effectiveness of our products and services as compared to alternative, competing
products and services, and our ability to train customers concerning the proper
use and application of our products. There can be no assurance that our products
and services will achieve a level of market acceptance that will be profitable
for us.

There can be no assurance that we will successfully commercialize any products
and services based on microbial technology or manage the related manufacturing,
marketing, sales, licensing and customer support operations in a profitable
manner. In particular, our prospects must be considered in light of the
problems, delays, expenses and difficulties encountered by any company in the
startup stage, many of which may be beyond our control. These problems, delays,
expenses and difficulties include unanticipated problems relating to product
development and formulation, testing, quality control, production, inventory
management, sales and marketing and additional costs and competition, any of
which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations. There can be no assurance that our products and
services can be successfully marketed or that we will ever achieve significant
revenues or profitable operations.

Our ability to become profitable will depend on a variety of factors, including
the following:

         o        price, volume and timing of product sales;
         o        variations in gross margins on our products, which may be
                  affected by the sales mix and competitive pricing pressures;
         o        regulatory approvals for using our bioremediation products,
                  including permits for treatment sites, water quality permits,
                  air quality permits, and other permits as required by
                  particular jurisdictions;
         o        changes in our levels of research and development, including
                  the timing of any demonstration projects for regulatory
                  approval;
         o        acquisitions of products, technology or companies; and
         o        our ability to obtain performance bonding when required.

Our long-term success will also be affected by expenses, difficulties or delays
encountered in developing and selling microbial technology, competition, and the
often burdensome environmental regulations associated with permitting
hydrocarbon remediation sites.

WE WILL FACE INTENSE COMPETITION FROM COMPETITORS THAT HAVE GREATER FINANCIAL,
TECHNICAL AND MARKETING RESOURCES. THESE COMPETITIVE FORCES MAY IMPACT OUR
PROJECTED GROWTH AND ABILITY TO GENERATE REVENUES AND PROFITS, WHICH WOULD HAVE
A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON OUR BUSINESS AND THE VALUE OF YOUR INVESTMENT.

We likely will face intense competition from other environmental companies,
virtually all of which can be expected to have longer operating histories,
greater name recognition, larger installed customer bases and significantly more
financial resources, research and development facilities and manufacturing and
marketing experience than us. There can be no assurance that developments by our
current or potential competitors will not render our proposed products or
services obsolete.

                                       10



<PAGE>

In addition, we expect to face additional competition from new entrants into our
targeted industry segments. As the demand for products and services based on
microbial technology grows and new markets are exploited, we expect that
competition will become more intense, as current and future competitors begin to
offer an increasing number of diversified products and services.

Although we believe that we have certain technical advantages over certain of
our competitors, including, without limitation, the development of technological
innovations that will make the BIO-RAPTOR(TM) and the use of our microbial
blends more economical and efficient than other bioremediation methods,
maintaining such advantages will require a continued high level of investment in
research and development, marketing, sales and customer support. We may not have
sufficient resources to maintain our research and development, marketing, sales
and customer support efforts on a competitive basis. Additionally, we may not be
able to make the technological advances necessary to maintain a competitive
advantage with respect to our products and services. Increased competition could
result in price reductions, fewer product orders, obsolete technology and
reduced operating margins, any of which could materially and adversely affect
our business, financial condition and results of operations.

WE ARE DEPENDENT FOR OUR SUCCESS ON A FEW KEY EXECUTIVE OFFICERS. OUR INABILITY
TO RETAIN THOSE OFFICERS WOULD IMPEDE OUR BUSINESS PLAN AND GROWTH STRATEGIES,
WHICH WOULD HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON OUR BUSINESS AND THE VALUE OF YOUR
INVESTMENT.

Our success depends to a critical extent on the continued efforts of services of
Bruce S. Beattie, our President and Chief Executive and Behzad Mirzayi,
Executive Vice-President. Were we to lose one or more of these key executive
officers, we would be forced to expend significant time and money in the pursuit
of a replacement, which would result in both a delay in the implementation of
our business plan and the diversion of limited working capital. We can give you
no assurance that we can find satisfactory replacements for these key executive
officers at all, or on terms that are not unduly expensive or burdensome to our
company. Although Messrs. Beattie and Mirzayi have employment agreements
providing for their continued service to the company through December 2007,
these agreements will not preclude either of these employees from leaving the
company. We currently carry a key man life insurance policy on Bruce S. Beattie
which would assist us in recouping our costs in the event of the loss of this
officer.

OUR INABILITY TO HIRE QUALIFIED PERSONNEL COULD IMPEDE OUR ABILITY TO GENERATE
REVENUES AND PROFITS AND TO OTHERWISE IMPLEMENT OUR BUSINESS PLAN AND GROWTH
STRATEGIES, WHICH WOULD HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON OUR BUSINESS AND COULD
ADVERSELY AFFECT THE VALUE OF YOUR INVESTMENT.

We currently have an extremely small staff comprised of 4 employees. Although we
believe that our employees, together with the consultants currently engaged by
our company, will be able to handle most of our additional management,
administrative, research and development, sales and marketing, and manufacturing
requirements in the short term as we ramp up our sales and operations, we will
nevertheless be required over the longer-term to hire highly skilled managerial,
engineering, technical, sales and marketing and administrative personnel to
fully implement our business plan and growth strategies. We may not be able to
engage the services of such qualified personnel at competitive prices or at all,
particularly given the risks of employment attributable to our limited financial
resources and lack of an established track record.

OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS MAY HIGHLY FLUCTUATE FROM QUARTER TO QUARTER AS WE
CONTINUE TO GROW, THEREFORE YOU CANNOT USE THESE RESULTS TO PREDICT HOW WE MAY
PERFORM IN THE FUTURE.

As a result of our limited operating history, we do not have historical
financial data for a significant number of periods in which to base our planned
operating expenses. In addition our revenues have not met our expectations. Our
expense levels are based in part on our projections as to future revenues that
are expected to increase. It is anticipated that as we mature, our sales and
operating results may fluctuate from quarter to quarter and from year to year
due to a combination of factors, including, among others:

         o        the volume, timing of, and ability to fulfill customer orders;
         o        the demand for our products and services;
         o        the number, timing and significance of product enhancements
                  and new product introductions by us and our competitors;
         o        changes in pricing policies by us or our competitors;
         o        changes in the level of operating expenses;
         o        expenses incurred in connection with our plans to fund greater
                  levels of sales and marketing activities and operations,
                  develop new distribution channels, broaden our customer
                  support capabilities and continue our R&D activities;
         o        personnel changes;

                                       11



<PAGE>

         o        product defects and other product or service quality problems;
         o        general domestic and international legal, economic and
                  political conditions; and
         o        Any unfavorable changes in these or other factors could have a
                  material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
                  and results of operation.

OUR INABILITY TO KEEP UP WITH TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS COULD PREVENT OUR
PRODUCTS FROM GAINING AND MAINTAINING MARKET ACCEPTANCE, WHICH COULD NEGATIVELY
IMPACT OUR PROJECTED GROWTH AND ABILITY TO GENERATE REVENUES AND PROFITS AND
HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON OUR BUSINESS AND THE VALUE OF YOUR INVESTMENT.

The markets for our products and services based on microbial technology are
generally characterized by rapid technological change and are highly competitive
with respect to timely innovations. Accordingly, we believe that our ability to
succeed in the sale of our products and services will depend significantly upon
the technological quality of our products and services relative to those of our
competitors, and our ability to continue to develop and introduce new and
enhanced products and services at competitive prices and in a timely and
cost-effective manner.

In particular, our future success is dependent upon our BIO-RAPTOR(TM),
Remediline(TM), MTBEctomy(TM), BAC(TM), and BioGAC(TM) product lines, each of
which is innovative and has not achieved market acceptance. In order to develop
such new products and services, we will depend upon close relationships with
existing customers that previously utilized microbial technology in the
bioremediation, agricultural and waste treatment industries, and our ability to
continue to develop and introduce new and enhanced products and services at
competitive prices and in a timely and cost-effective manner. There can be no
assurance that our customers will provide us with timely access to such
information or that we will be able to develop and market our new products and
services successfully or respond effectively to technological changes or new
product and service offerings of our competitors. We may not be able to develop
the required technologies, products and services on a cost-effective and timely
basis, and any inability to do so could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.

OUR INABILITY TO PROTECT OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS COULD NEGATIVELY
IMPACT OUR PROJECTED GROWTH, OUR ABILITY TO GENERATE REVENUES AND PROFITS AND
THE VALUE OF YOUR INVESTMENT.

We rely on patent, trademark, trade secret and copyright protection to protect
our technology. We believe that technological leadership in microbial technology
will be achieved through additional factors such as the technological and
creative skills of our personnel, new product developments, frequent product
enhancements, name recognition and reliable product maintenance. Nevertheless,
our ability to compete effectively depends in part on our ability to develop and
maintain proprietary aspects of our technology, such as those patents currently
licensed by our technology and research and development affiliate, XyclonyX. We
may not secure future patents and patents may become invalid and may not provide
meaningful protection for our product innovations. In addition, the laws of some
foreign countries do not protect our intellectual property rights to the same
extent as do the laws of the United States. Furthermore, there can be no
assurance that competitors will not independently develop similar products,
"reverse engineer" our products, or, if patents are issued to us, design around
such patents.

We also rely upon a combination of copyright, trademark, trade secret and other
intellectual property laws to protect our proprietary rights by entering into
confidentiality or license agreements with our employees, consultants and
vendors, and by controlling access to and distribution of our technology,
documentation and other proprietary information. There can be no assurance,
however, that the steps taken by us will not be challenged, invalidated or
circumvented, or that the rights granted there under will provide a competitive
advantage to us. Any such circumstance could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and results of operations.

While we are not currently engaged in any intellectual property litigation or
proceedings, there can be no assurance that we will not become so involved in
the future or that our products do not infringe any intellectual property or
other proprietary right of any third party. Such litigation could result in
substantial costs, the diversion of resources and personnel, and subject us to
significant liabilities to third parties, any of which could have a material
adverse effect on our business.

IF OUR LICENSEES OR STRATEGIC PARTNERS WE RELY UPON TO PROVIDE US WITH MICROBIAL
TECHNOLOGY INTEGRAL TO OUR PRODUCTS FAIL TO PROTECT THEIR RIGHTS, OR IF OUR
LICENSE AGREEMENTS INFRINGE ON THIRD-PARTY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, OUR
ABILITY TO GENERATE REVENUES AND PROFITS AND TO OTHERWISE IMPLEMENT OUR BUSINESS
PLAN AND GROWTH STRATEGIES WILL BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED. THIS FAILURE WOULD HAVE A
NEGATIVE IMPACT ON OUR BUSINESS AND THE VALUE OF YOUR INVESTMENT.

We also rely on certain technology which we license from third parties,
including microbial technology which is integrated with internally developed
products and used in the XyclonyX product line to perform key functions. There
can be no assurance that the patents underlying such third party technology
licenses will continue to remain unchallenged or that we will not have to defend

                                       12



<PAGE>

them, along with the licensors, to continue their commercial viability to us.
The loss of or inability to maintain any of these technology licenses could
result in delays or reductions in product shipments which could materially
adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO OBTAIN SUFFICIENT CONTRACT BONDING, WHICH COULD LIMIT THE
NUMBER AND SIZE OF PROJECTS WE OBTAIN.

The deployment of engineering services for certain government and private
remediation projects may require contract performance bonding. The collateral
and bonding requirements could limit the number and size of projects requiring
bonds undertaken by the company. In the event contract bonding cannot be
obtained at an economical price or collateral requirements are beyond the
company's financial capability the failure to obtain contract bonding could have
a material adverse effect on the company's business, financial condition and
results of operations.

FOREIGN DISTRIBUTORS MAY EXPLOIT OUR PRODUCTS WITHOUT COMPENSATION TO US, WHICH
COULD NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR ABILITY TO GENERATE REVENUES AND PROFITS AND THE
VALUE OF YOUR INVESTMENT.

When we ship to foreign distributors, they may try to reverse engineer our
remediation technology and exploit it without compensating us. Foreign
distributors may also set up manufacturing and distribution operations that
could compete unfairly with us, using lower prices or broader distribution.
There is no assurance that we will be able to protect our business through the
use of licensing agreements against such events.

WE MAY NOT BE SUCCESSFUL IN OUR INTERNATIONAL SALES ACTIVITIES, WHICH COULD
ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR GROWTH.

Our international sales will be limited if we are unable to establish and
maintain relationships with international distributors and customers. Even if we
increase our international sales efforts, we cannot be certain that it will
increase demand for our products in these markets. Our international operations
are subject to a number of risks, including:

         o        Market acceptance;
         o        Environmental laws;
         o        Longer sales cycles;
         o        Difficulty in collecting accounts receivable;
         o        Political and economic instability;
         o        Reduced protection of intellectual property rights;
         o        Protectionist laws and business practices that favor local
                  competition;
         o        Dependence on local vendors;
         o        and Foreign language barriers.

In addition, because we intend to market our products internationally, a portion
of our expected international revenue may be denominated in foreign currencies
in the future, which will subject us to risks associated with fluctuations in
the foreign currencies. An increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to
foreign currencies could make our products more expensive and therefore less
competitive in foreign markets.

WE MAY BE SUBJECT TO FUTURE ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES WHICH ARE NOT COVERED BY,
OR EXCEED THE COVERAGE AMOUNTS OF, OUR INSURANCE WHICH COULD AFFECT OUR RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS OR FINANCIAL CONDITION.

We are subject to Federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the
use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of hazardous materials and
waste products. We currently maintain a supply of several hazardous materials at
our facilities. While we currently meet these environmental requirements, there
is no assurance that future laws and regulations will not impose significant
compliance costs. If there is an accident, we could be held liable for any
damages that result and the liability could exceed our resources and which may
not be adequately covered by insurance, if at all. In addition, the use of our
BIO-RAPTOR(TM) requires permits to treat contaminated soil. Permit issues may
delay the implementation and installation of our products, including the
BIO-RAPTOR(TM).

WE MAY BE SUBJECT TO FUTURE PRODUCT LIABILITY CLAIMS THAT MAY BE COSTLY TO
DEFEND, REQUIRE US TO PAY MONEY TO CLAIMANTS AND DIVERT OUR MANAGERIAL AND
FINANCIAL RESOURCES, WHICH COULD HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON OUR BUSINESS AND THE
VALUE OF YOUR INVESTMENT.

The development, marketing, sale and licensing of products based on microbial
technology entail liability risks in the event of product failure or claim of
harm caused by product operation. While we offer to contract with our potential
customers on a pay for performance basis, and we are not aware of any claim
against us based upon the use or failure of our products, end users of any of

                                       13



<PAGE>

our proposed products and services could assert claims against us. Although we
maintain product liability insurance against any such claims, there can be no
assurance that such insurance will be sufficient to cover all potential
liabilities, or that we will be able to continue to obtain insurance coverage in
an amount that we believe to be adequate. If there is a successful suit against
us, lack or insufficiency of insurance coverage would have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In
addition, the assertion of these claims, even if unsuccessful or without merit,
could damage our reputation or that of our licensees or their products. This
damage could limit the marketing and sales efforts and harm our results of
operations.

OUR ENGINEERING SERVICES LIABILITY INSURANCE MAY NOT BE SUFFICIENT TO COVER ALL
POTENTIAL LIABILITIES, WHICH COULD CAUSE US TO MAKE SUBSTANTIAL PAYMENTS TO
CLAIMANTS AND NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND THE VALUE OF YOUR
INVESTMENT.

Our engineering services are covered under a $1 million professional errors and
omissions policy for the execution of professional engineering services in
support of our activities. We are not aware of any claims or disputes exceeding
this insured limit. While we will continue to maintain professional engineering
liability insurance against any such claims, there can be no assurance that such
insurance will be sufficient to cover all potential liabilities, or that we will
be able to continue to obtain insurance coverage in an amount that we believe to
be adequate. In the event of a successful suit against us, lack or insufficiency
of insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.

WE RELY EXCLUSIVELY ON OUR SOLE SUPPLIER, WEST COAST FERMENTATION CENTER, INC.,
A SUBSIDIARY OF OUR PARENT COMPANY. WEST COAST FERMENTATION CENTER HAS LIMITED
SERVICE AND MANUFACTURING FACILITIES. THEIR FAILURE TO MEET OUR SERVICE
REQUIREMENTS COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR ABILITY TO TIMELY AND EFFICIENTLY
SERVICE OUR CLIENTS' NEEDS, WHICH COULD NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR ABILITY TO
GENERATE REVENUES AND PROFITS.

Our future performance will depend to a substantial degree upon our ability to
engineer, manufacture, market and deliver our products and services based on the
remediation technology in an efficient and profitable manner. We purchase the
microbial products from West Coast Fermentation Center, Inc. ("WCFC"), a wholly
owned manufacturing subsidiary of U.S. Microbics, Inc. As of this date, WCFC has
only partially implemented its final build-out of manufacturing operations.
Prior to becoming our supplier, WCFC had no experience in maintaining the type
of facility that will manufacture our products in the quantities required for
profitable operations. Accordingly, WCFC may not be able to complete the
facility in a timely manner, the cost of completing the facility may exceed its
current estimates, the demand for the our products may exceed the facility's
capacity or the facility may not achieve satisfactory levels of manufacturing
efficiency in a timely manner or at a level of quality control that meets
competitive demands. In addition, the implementation of WCFC's manufacturing
operations at the facility presents risks that, singly or in any combination,
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. These risks include, but are not limited to, production
delays associated with products based on the remediation technology,
unavailability of required capital equipment and qualified personnel, raw
material shortages, higher-than-expected overhead or operational costs, lack of
sufficient quality control over the products and order backlogs. In addition,
WCFC's development of its internal manufacturing capacity will depend in large
part on its ability to raise sufficient capital for this purpose. WCFC may not
be able to develop adequate manufacturing capacity or raise sufficient capital,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
results of operations and possibly on our relationships with our customers and
vendors. WCFC may consider third-party outsourcing arrangements for the
manufacture and supply of certain products during the period in which WCFC
expands its internal manufacturing capacity. These outsourcing arrangements are
subject to various risks, including, without limitation, production delays or
interruptions, inferior product quality, misappropriation of trade secrets and
lower profit margins.

RISKS RELATING TO AN INVESTMENT IN OUR SECURITIES

THE SALE OF OUR COMMON STOCK TO FUSION CAPITAL MAY CAUSE DILUTION AND THE SALE
OF THE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK ACQUIRED BY FUSION CAPITAL COULD CAUSE THE PRICE
OF OUR COMMON STOCK TO DECLINE.

The purchase price for the common stock to be issued to Fusion Capital pursuant
to the common stock purchase agreement will fluctuate based on the price of our
common stock. All shares included in the prospectus which is a part of the
registration statement filed with the Commission on November 5, 2004, will be
freely tradable once sold pursuant to the terms outlined in the Plan of
Distribution in such prospectus. Fusion Capital may sell none, some or all of
the common shares purchased from us at any time. We expect that the shares
offered by this prospectus will be sold over a period of up to 24 months from
the date of the prospectus. Depending upon market liquidity at the time, a sale
of shares under that offering at any given time could cause the trading price of
our common stock to decline. The sale of a substantial number of shares of our
common stock under that offering, or anticipation of such sales, could make it
more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future
at a time and at a price that we might otherwise wish to effect sales.

                                       14



<PAGE>

Additionally, in connection with the convertible promissory note issued to
Fusion Capital, we have registered up to 1,500,000 shares of our common stock in
the registration statement which was declared effective on November 9, 2004. The
maturity date of the Note is January 31, 2005. If the Note is converted
immediately prior to the maturity date, the company would issue approximately
840,000 shares of our common stock to Fusion Capital, including interest. If the
Note is converted after the maturity date, the company may issue more than
840,000 shares of common stock to Fusion Capital, including interest as of the
conversion date. Sales of large amount of these shares in the public market
could substantially depress the prevailing market prices for our shares. If that
were to happen, the value of your investment could decline substantially.

THE TRADING PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK MAY DECREASE DUE TO FACTORS BEYOND OUR
CONTROL.

The trading price of the common stock is subject to significant fluctuations in
response to numerous factors, including:

         o        Variations in anticipated or actual results of operations;
         o        Announcements of new products or technological innovations by
                  us or our competitors;
         o        Changes in earnings estimates of operational results by
                  analysts;
         o        Results of product demonstrations.
         o        Inability of market makers to combat short positions on the
                  stock;
         o        Inability of the market to absorb large blocks of stock sold
                  into the market;
         o        Developments or disputes concerning our licensed patents,
                  trademarks or proprietary rights; and
         o        Comments about us or our markets posted on the Internet.

Moreover, the stock market from time to time has experienced extreme price and
volume fluctuations, which have particularly affected the market prices for
emerging growth companies and which often have been unrelated to the operating
performance of the companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely
affect the market price of our common stock. If our shareholders sell
substantial amounts of their common stock in the public market, the price of our
common stock could fall. These sales also might make it more difficult for us to
sell equity or equity related securities in the future at a price we deem
appropriate.

U.S. MICROBICS, INC., OUR PARENT COMPANY, CONTROLS MORE THAN A MAJORITY OF OUR
OUTSTANDING COMMON SHARES, WHICH MAY LIMIT THE ABILITY OF YOURSELF OR OTHER
SHAREHOLDERS, WHETHER ACTING SINGLY OR TOGETHER, TO PROPOSE OR DIRECT THE
MANAGEMENT OR OVERALL DIRECTION OF OUR COMPANY. ADDITIONALLY, THIS CONCENTRATION
OF OWNERSHIP COULD DISCOURAGE OR PREVENT A POTENTIAL TAKEOVER OF OUR COMPANY
THAT MIGHT OTHERWISE RESULT IN YOU RECEIVING A PREMIUM OVER THE MARKET PRICE FOR
YOUR COMMON SHARES

U.S. Microbics, Inc., our majority shareholder, together with its subsidiary
USM Capital Group, Inc., own approximately 90% of the outstanding shares of
common stock. As a result, U.S. Microbics, Inc. is able to exercise significant
influence over all matters requiring shareholder approval, including the
election of directors and the approval of significant corporate transactions.
Such a concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying or
preventing a change in control of the company.

TO DATE, WE HAVE NOT PAID ANY CASH DIVIDENDS AND NO CASH DIVIDENDS WILL BE PAID
IN THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE.

We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common shares in the
foreseeable future. We may not have enough funds to legally pay dividends, or
that even if the funds are legally available, we may nevertheless decide not to
pay dividends.

THE APPLICATION OF THE "PENNY STOCK" RULES COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE MARKET
PRICE OF OUR COMMON SHARES AND INCREASE YOUR TRANSACTION COSTS TO SELL THOSE
SHARES.

As long as the trading price of our common shares is below $5 per share, the
open-market trading of our common shares will be subject to the "penny stock"
rules. The "penny stock" rules impose additional sales practice requirements on
broker-dealers who sell securities to persons other than established customers
and accredited investors (generally those with assets in excess of $1,000,000 or
annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 together with their spouse). For
transactions covered by these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special
suitability determination for the purchase of securities and have received the
purchaser's written consent to the transaction before the purchase.
Additionally, for any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the
broker-dealer must deliver, before the transaction, a disclosure schedule
prescribed by the SEC relating to the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also
must disclose the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the
registered representative and current quotations for the securities. Finally,
monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information on the
limited market in penny stocks. These additional burdens imposed on
broker-dealers may restrict the ability or decrease the willingness of
broker-dealers to sell the common shares, and may result in decreased liquidity
for our common shares and increased transaction costs for sales and purchases of
our common shares as compared to other securities.

                                      15



<PAGE>

OUR COMMON SHARES ARE THINLY TRADED, SO YOU MAY BE UNABLE TO SELL AT OR NEAR ASK
PRICES OR AT ALL IF YOU NEED TO SELL YOUR SHARES TO RAISE MONEY OR OTHERWISE
DESIRE TO LIQUIDATE YOUR SHARES.

Our common shares have historically been sporadically or "thinly-traded" on the
OTCBB, meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing our common
shares at or near ask prices at any given time may be relatively small or
non-existent. This situation is attributable to a number of factors, including
the fact that we are a small company which is relatively unknown to stock
analysts, stock brokers, institutional investors and others in the investment
community that generate or influence sales volume, and that even if we came to
the attention of such persons, they tend to be risk-averse and would be
reluctant to follow an unproven company such as ours or purchase or recommend
the purchase of our shares until such time as we became more seasoned and
viable. As a consequence, there may be periods of several days or more when
trading activity in our shares is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a
seasoned issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity that
will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect on share
price. We cannot give you any assurance that a broader or more active public
trading market for our common shares will develop or be sustained, or that
current trading levels will be sustained.

THE SALE OF ADDITIONAL SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK TO FUSION UNDER THE COMMON
STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT COULD CAUSE OUR COMMON STOCK PRICE TO DECLINE DUE TO
THE ADDITIONAL SHARES AVAILABLE IN THE MARKET, PARTICULARLY IN LIGHT OF THE
RELATIVELY THIN TRADING VOLUME OF OUR COMMON STOCK.

The market price of our common stock could decline and the voting power and
value of your investment would be subject to continual dilution if Fusion
Capital purchases the shares and resells those shares into the market. Under the
common stock purchase agreement, we can sell up to $12,500 of shares of our
common stock each trading day to Fusion Capital. Any adverse affect on the
market price of our common stock would increase the number of shares issuable to
Fusion Capital each trading day which would increase the dilution of your
investment. Although we have the right to reduce or suspend Fusion Capital
purchases at any time, our financial condition at the time may require us to
waive our right to suspend purchases even if there is a decline in the market
price. Sales of large amount of these shares in the public market could
substantially depress the prevailing market prices for our shares. If that were
to happen, the value of your investment could decline substantially.

In addition, Fusion Capital may not purchase shares of our common stock under
the common stock purchase agreement if Fusion Capital, together with its
affiliates, would beneficially own more than 9.9% of our common stock
outstanding at the time of the purchase by Fusion Capital. However, this 9.9%
limitation does not prevent Fusion Capital from purchasing shares of our common
stock and then reselling those shares at times when neither Fusion Capital nor
its affiliates beneficially own shares in excess of the 9.9% limitation.
Therefore, by periodically selling our common shares into the market, Fusion
Capital together with its affiliates could in the aggregate sell more than 9.9%
of our outstanding shares. Consequently, the 9.9% limitation will not
necessarily prevent substantial dilution of the voting power and value of your
investment.

THE MARKET PRICE FOR OUR COMMON SHARES IS PARTICULARLY VOLATILE GIVEN OUR STATUS
AS A RELATIVELY UNKNOWN COMPANY WITH A SMALL AND THINLY-TRADED PUBLIC FLOAT,
LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY AND LACK OF REVENUES WHICH COULD LEAD TO WIDE
FLUCTUATIONS IN OUR SHARE PRICE. THE PRICE AT WHICH YOU PURCHASE OUR COMMON
SHARES MAY NOT BE INDICATIVE OF THE PRICE THAT WILL PREVAIL IN THE TRADING
MARKET. YOU MAY BE UNABLE TO SELL YOUR COMMON SHARES AT OR ABOVE YOUR PURCHASE
PRICE, WHICH MAY RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL LOSSES TO YOU.

The market for our common shares is characterized by significant price
volatility when compared to seasoned issuers, and we expect that our share price
will continue to be more volatile than a seasoned issuer for the indefinite
future. The volatility in our share price is attributable to a number of
factors. First, as noted above, our common shares are sporadically and thinly
traded. As a consequence of this lack of liquidity, the trading of relatively
small quantities of shares by our shareholders may disproportionately influence
the price of those shares in either direction. The price for our shares could,
for example, decline precipitously in the event that a large number of our
common shares are sold on the market without commensurate demand, as compared to
a seasoned issuer which could better absorb those sales without adverse impact
on its share price. Secondly, we are a speculative or "risky" investment due to
our limited operating history and lack of revenues or profits to date, and
uncertainty of future market acceptance for our potential products. As a
consequence of this enhanced risk, more risk-adverse investors may, under the
fear of losing all or most of their investment in the event of negative news or
lack of progress, be more inclined to sell their shares on the market more
quickly and at greater discounts than would be the case with the stock of a
seasoned issuer. The following factors may add to the volatility in the price of
our common shares: actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly or annual
operating results; acceptance of our proprietary technology ; government
regulations, announcements of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships
or joint ventures; our capital commitments; and additions or departures of our
key personnel. Many of these factors are beyond our control and may decrease the
market price of our common shares, regardless of our operating performance. We
cannot make any predictions or projections as to what the prevailing market
price for our common shares will be at any time, including as to whether our
common shares will sustain their current market prices, or as to what effect
that the sale of shares or the availability of common shares for sale at any
time will have on the prevailing market price.

                                       16



<PAGE>

Shareholders should be aware that, according to SEC Release No. 34-29093, the
market for penny stocks has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and
abuse. Such patterns include (1) control of the market for the security by one
or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer; (2)
manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and
false and misleading press releases; (3) boiler room practices involving
high-pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced
sales persons; (4) excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differential and markups by
selling broker-dealers; and (5) the wholesale dumping of the same securities by
promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired
level, along with the resulting inevitable collapse of those prices and with
consequent investor losses. Our management is aware of the abuses that have
occurred historically in the penny stock market. Although we do not expect to be
in a position to dictate the behavior of the market or of broker-dealers who
participate in the market, management will strive within the confines of
practical limitations to prevent the described patterns from being established
with respect to our securities. The occurrence of these patterns or practices
could increase the volatility of our share price.

VOLATILITY IN OUR COMMON SHARE PRICE MAY SUBJECT US TO SECURITIES LITIGATION,
THEREBY DIVERTING OUR RESOURCES WHICH MAY HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

As discussed in the preceding risk factor, the market for our common shares is
characterized by significant price volatility when compared to seasoned issuers,
and we expect that our share price will continue to be more volatile than a
seasoned issuer for the indefinite future. In the past, plaintiffs have often
initiated securities class action litigation against a company following periods
of volatility in the market price of its securities. We may in the future be the
target of similar litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial
costs and liabilities and could divert management's attention and resources.

OUR ISSUANCE OF ADDITIONAL PREFERRED SHARES, OR OPTIONS OR WARRANTS TO PURCHASE
THOSE SHARES, COULD NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE VALUE OF YOUR INVESTMENT IN OUR COMMON
SHARES AS THE RESULT OF PREFERENTIAL VOTING RIGHTS OR VETO POWERS, DIVIDEND
RIGHTS, DISPROPORTIONATE RIGHTS TO APPOINT DIRECTORS TO OUR BOARD, CONVERSION
RIGHTS, REDEMPTION RIGHTS AND LIQUIDATION PROVISIONS GRANTED TO THE PREFERRED
SHAREHOLDERS, INCLUDING THE GRANT OF RIGHTS THAT COULD DISCOURAGE OR PREVENT THE
DISTRIBUTION OF DIVIDENDS TO YOU, OR PREVENT THE SALE OF OUR ASSETS OR A
POTENTIAL TAKEOVER OF OUR COMPANY THAT MIGHT OTHERWISE RESULT IN YOU RECEIVING A
DISTRIBUTION OR A PREMIUM OVER THE MARKET PRICE FOR YOUR COMMON SHARES. THE
CONVERSION OF OUR OUTSTANDING PREFERRED SHARES COULD RESULT IN THE SUBSTANTIAL
DILUTION OF YOUR INVESTMENT IN TERMS OF YOUR PERCENTAGE OWNERSHIP IN THE COMPANY
AS WELL AS THE BOOK VALUE OF YOUR COMMON SHARES. THE SALE OF A LARGE AMOUNT OF
COMMON SHARES RECEIVED UPON THE CONVERSION OF OUT OUTSTANDING PREFERRED SHARES,
COULD SUBSTANTIALLY DEPRESS THE PREVAILING MARKET PRICES FOR OUR COMMON STOCK.

We are entitled under our certificate of incorporation to issue up to
300,000,000 common and 50,000,000 "blank check" preferred shares. As of December
31, 2005, after taking into consideration our outstanding common and preferred
shares, we will be entitled to issue up to 230,212,540 additional common shares
and 44,037,335 additional preferred shares. Our board may generally issue those
common and preferred shares, or options or warrants to purchase those shares,
without further approval by our shareholders based upon such factors as our
board of directors may deem relevant at that time. Any preferred shares we may
issues shall have such rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions as may
be designated from time-to-time by our board, including preferential dividend
rights, voting rights, conversion rights, redemption rights and liquidation
provisions. It is likely that we will be required to issue a large amount of
additional securities to raise capital to further our development and marketing
plans. It is also likely that we will be required to issue a large amount of
additional securities to directors, officers, employees and consultants as
compensatory grants in connection with their services, both in the form of
stand-alone grants or under our various stock plans. We cannot give you any
assurance that we will not issue additional common or preferred shares, or
options or warrants to purchase those shares, under circumstances we may deem
appropriate at the time, which could negatively impact the value of your
investment in our common shares.

In the event of the conversion of our preferred shares, you could suffer
substantial dilution of your investment in terms of your percentage ownership in
the company as well as the book value of your common shares. Potential dilutive
effects of future sales of our common shares by our stockholders, including
Fusion Capital, could have an adverse effect on the prices of our securities.

THE ELIMINATION OF MONETARY LIABILITY AGAINST OUR DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND
EMPLOYEES UNDER OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND THE EXISTENCE OF
INDEMNIFICATION RIGHTS TO OUR DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES MAY RESULT IN
SUBSTANTIAL EXPENDITURES BY OUR COMPANY AND MAY DISCOURAGE LAWSUITS AGAINST OUR
DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES.

                                       17



<PAGE>

Our certificate of incorporation contains provisions which eliminate the
liability of and indemnify our directors for monetary damages to our company and
shareholders to the maximum extent permitted under Delaware corporate law. We
may also have contractual indemnification obligations under our agreements with
our directors, officers and employees. The foregoing indemnification obligations
could result in our company incurring substantial expenditures to cover the cost
of settlement or damage awards against directors, officers and employees, which
we may be unable to recoup. These provisions and resultant costs may also
discourage our company from bringing a lawsuit against directors, officers and
employees for breaches of their fiduciary duties, and may similarly discourage
the filing of derivative litigation by our shareholders against our directors,
officers and employees even though such actions, if successful, might otherwise
benefit our company and shareholders.

OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION PROVIDES THAT WE ARE SUBJECT TO SECTION 203 OF
THE DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW WHICH APPLIES TO BUSINESS COMBINATIONS WITH
INTERESTED STOCKHOLDERS, WHICH COULD DISCOURAGE OR PREVENT A POTENTIAL TAKEOVER
OF OUR COMPANY THAT MIGHT OTHERWISE RESULT IN YOU RECEIVING A PREMIUM OVER THE
MARKET PRICE FOR YOUR COMMON SHARES.

Our Certificate of Incorporation provides that we are subject to Section 203 of
the Delaware General Corporation Law which precludes a shareholder who owns 15%
or more of our shares from entering into a "business combination" involving our
company for a period of three years, unless (1) our board of directors approves
the combination before the shareholder acquires the 15% interest; (2) the
interested shareholder acquires at least 85% of our shares as part of the
transaction in which he acquired the initial 15%, excluding shares owned by our
officers who are also directors and voting stock held by employee benefit plans;
or (3) the combination is approved by a majority vote of our board of directors
and two-thirds vote of our other shareholders at a duly called shareholders'
meeting. A "business combination" is defined as (1) a merger or consolidation
requiring shareholder approval, (2) the sale, lease, pledge, or other
disposition of our assets, including by dissolution, having at least 50% of the
entire asset value of our company, or (3) a proposed tender or exchange offer of
50% or more of our voting stock. Our Certificate of Incorporation provides that
the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law shall not
apply to Robert C. Brehm, Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Microbics,

ITEM 2.  DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES

The Company shares an administrative facility with U.S. Microbics, Inc. in a
12,083 square foot building located at 6451-C El Camino Real, Carlsbad,
California. The facility houses the fermentation plant, the research and
development facility of XyclonyX, and the operations of the Company, Bio-Con
Microbes, and Sol Tech. The facility should provide enough space for the Company
for the next two years of operation, at which time additional space may be
required. U.S. Microbics, Inc., charges the Company its pro-rata share of the
rent based on floor space. The Company's Engineering Resources Division is
headquartered in Littleton, Colorado in an office facility that can accommodate
up to 5 engineers. The Company also maintains a project office in South
Carolina.

ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not a party to any pending material legal proceedings and are not aware
of any threatened or contemplated proceeding by any governmental authority
against our company. No director, executive officer or affiliate of the Company
or owner of record or beneficially of more than five percent of the Company's
common stock is a party adverse to the Company or has a material interest
adverse to the Company in any proceeding.

ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

         None

ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS

MARKET INFORMATION

Our common shares are currently quoted on the Nasdaq OTC Bulletin Board (OTCBB)
under the symbol "SSWM." The following table sets forth the quarterly high and
low bid prices for our common shares on the OTCBB for the last two fiscal years
periods indicated. The prices set forth below represent inter-dealer quotations,
without retail markup, markdown or commission and may not be reflective of
actual transactions. Our common shares have been quoted on the OTC Bulletin
Board since August 19, 2003.

                                                           BID PRICE
                                                           ---------
                              PERIOD                   HIGH            LOW
                              ------                   ----            ---

         FISCAL YEAR 2005:
            SEPTEMBER 30, 2005                        $ 0.28          $ 0.08
            JUNE 30, 2005                             $ 0.11          $ 0.06
            MARCH 31, 2005                            $ 0.26          $ 0.06
            DECEMBER 31, 2004                         $ 0.40          $ 0.18

         FISCAL YEAR 2004:
            SEPTEMBER 30, 2004                        $ 0.80          $ 0.17
            JUNE 30, 2004                             $ 0.60          $ 0.22
            MARCH 31, 2004                            $ 0.54          $ 0.17
            DECEMBER 31, 2003                         $ 0.80          $ 0.40

HOLDERS

We have approximately 200 record holders of our common stock as of December 31,
2005, according to a shareholders' list provided by our transfer agent as of
that date and our records relating to issuable shares. The number of registered
shareholders excludes any estimate by us of the number of beneficial owners of
common shares held in street name.

                                       19



<PAGE>

DIVIDEND POLICY

We have never paid any cash dividends on our common shares, and we do not
anticipate that we will pay any dividends with respect to those securities in
the foreseeable future. Our current business plan is to retain any future
earnings to finance the expansion development of our business. Any future
determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of our board of
directors, and will be dependent upon our financial condition, results of
operations, capital requirements and other factors as our board may deem
relevant at that time.

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

         Set forth in the table below is information regarding awards made
through compensation plans or arrangements through September 30, 2005, the most
recently completed fiscal year.

<TABLE>
<S>     <C>
                                                                                              Number of securities
                                                                                              remaining available for
                                                                                              future issuance under
                                   Number of securities to         Weighted average           equity compensation
                                   be issued upon exercise         exercise price of          plans (excluding
                                   of outstanding options,         outstanding options,       securities reflected in
Plan Category                      warrants and rights             warrants and rights        column 2)
---------------------------------  ---------------------------     -----------------------    -----------------------
Equity Compensation Plans
Approved by Security Holders              3,225,000                         N/A                       -0-

Equity Compensation Plans
Not Approved by Security Holders               N/A                          N/A                       N/A

1.  Includes Converted Preferred Shares
</TABLE>

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
---------------------------------------

         We have sold or issued the following securities not registered under
the Securities Act by reason of the exemption afforded under Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act of 1933, during the year period covered by this report. Except as
stated below, no underwriting discounts or commissions were payable with respect
to any of the following transactions. The offer and sale of the following
securities was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act
under Rule 506 insofar as (1) except as stated below, each of the investors was
accredited within the meaning of Rule 501(a); (2) the transfer of the securities
were restricted by the company in accordance with Rule 502(d); (3) there were no
more than 35 non-accredited investors in any transaction within the meaning of
Rule 506(b), after taking into consideration all prior investors under Section
4(2) of the Securities Act within the twelve months preceding the transaction;
and (4) none of the offers and sales were effected through any general
solicitation or general advertising within the meaning of Rule 502(c).

On September 29, 2005, the Company issued 179,122 shares of restricted common
stock to consulting services totaling $50,000. The shares were valued at $0.0977
per share.

On September 29, 2005, the Company issued 416,667 shares of restricted common
stock for notes payable totaling $50,000. The shares were valued at $0.12 per
share.

On September 27, 2005, the Company issued 2,839,665 shares of restricted common
stock to retire debt totaling $174,843. Of the shares issued, 1,944,965 were
valued at $0.0669 per share and 894,700 were valued at $0.05 per share.

On September 20, 2005, the Company issued 625,000 shares of restricted common
stock to for interest expense totaling $31,250. The shares were valued at $0.05
per share.

On September 8, 2005, the Company issued 2,125,000 shares of restricted common
stock to an investor in exchange for cash totaling $42,500. The shares were
valued at $0.02 per share.

On September 8, 2005, the Company issued 250,000 shares of restricted common
stock to in settlement of a finder's fee totaling $5,000. The shares were valued
at $0.02 per share.

On August 30, 2005, the Company issued 1,284,000 shares of restricted common
stock to retire debt totaling $64,200. The shares were valued at $0.05 per
share.

On August 17, 2005, the Company issued 664,455 shares of restricted common stock
in settlement of accounts payable totaling $26,222. The shares were valued at
$0.117 per share.

On August 9, 2005, the Company issued 2,500,000 shares of restricted common
stock to an investor in exchange for cash totaling $50,000. The shares were
valued at $0.02 per share.

On July 26, 2005, the Company issued 20,000,000 shares of restricted series S
preferred stock to U.S. Microbics totaling $20,000. The shares were valued at
$0.001 per share.

On July 26, 2005, the Company issued 1,500,000 shares of restricted common stock
to an investor in exchange for cash totaling $30,000. The shares were valued at
$0.02 per share.

On July 26, 2005, the Company issued 950,000 shares of restricted common stock
to an investor in exchange for cash totaling $32,500. Of the shares issued
625,000 were valued at $0.04 per share and 325,000 were valued at $0.02 per
share.

On July 26, 2005, the Company issued 625,000 shares of restricted common stock
to an investor in exchange for cash totaling $25,000. The shares were valued at
$0.04 per share.

On July 26, 2005, the Company issued 125,000 shares of restricted common stock
in settlement of a finder's fee totaling $5,000. The shares were valued at $0.04
per share.

On June 28, 2005, the Company issued 781,700 shares of restricted common stock
to West Coast Fermentation to satisfy an intercompany balance totaling $46,900.
The shares were valued at $0.06 per share.

On June 9, 2005, the Company issued 154,833 shares of restricted common stock to
satisfy debt totaling $9,290. The shares were valued at $0.06 per share.

On June 9, 2005, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of restricted common stock
to an investor in exchange for cash totaling $30,000. The shares were valued at
$0.03 per share.

On May 31, 2005, the Company issued 2,500,000 shares of restricted common stock
to an investor in exchange for cash totaling $50,000. The shares were valued at
$0.02 per share.

On May 31, 2005, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of restricted common stock
to an investor in exchange for cash totaling $50,000. The shares were valued at
$0.025 per share.

On May 31, 2005, the Company issued 83,300 shares of restricted common stock in
exchange for consulting services totaling $5,000. The shares were valued at
$0.06 per share.

On April 25, 2005, the Company issued 62,500 shares of restricted common stock
to in exchange for consulting services totaling $5,000. The shares were valued
at $0.08 per share.

On April 1, 2005, the Company issued 100,000 shares of restricted common stock
to an officer for accrued expenses totaling $7,500. The shares were valued at
$0.075 per share.

On March 31, 2005, the Company issued 75,000 shares of restricted common stock
in exchange for consulting services totaling $3,675. The shares were valued at
$0.049 per share.

On March 16, 2005, the Company issued 88,265 shares of restricted common stock
to in exchange for consulting services totaling $15,000. Of the shares issued
22,625 were valued at $0.221 per share, 29,410 were valued at $0.17 per share,
and 36,230 were valued at $0.138 per share.

On December 22, 2004, the Company issued 169,290 shares of restricted common
stock to in exchange for cash received and partial deposit for Water Machines
totaling $20,315. The shares were valued at $0.12 per share.

On December 6, 2004, the Company issued 25,345 shares of restricted common stock
in exchange for consulting services totaling $5,500. The shares were valued at
$0.2170 per share.

On November 30, 2004, the Company issued 25,000 shares of restricted common
stock in exchange for consulting services totaling $7,500. The shares were
valued at $0.30 per share.

On November 23, 2004, the Company issued 855,000 shares of restricted common
stock to in exchange for cash received and deposit for Water Machines totaling
$200,000. Of the shares issued 163,000 were valued at $0.2454 per share and
692,000 were valued at $0.2312 per share.

On November 14, 2004, the Company issued 27,500 shares of restricted common
stock in exchange for consulting services totaling $5,500. The shares were
valued at $0.20 per share.

On October 29, 2004, the Company issued 500,000 shares of restricted common
stock to an investor in exchange for cash totaling $100,000. The shares were
valued at $0.21 per share.

On October 21, 2004, the Company issued 50,000 shares of restricted common stock
to an investor in exchange for cash totaling $10,000. The shares were valued at
$0.20 per share.

On October 4, 2004, the Company issued 5,000 shares of restricted common stock
in exchange for consulting services totaling $1,850. The shares were valued at
$0.37 per share.

On September 28, 2004, the Company issued 5,669,700 shares of restricted common
stock to retire debt and accrued interest totaling $873,849. Of the shares
issued 1,169,700 were valued at $0.17 per share and 4,500,000 shares were valued
at $0.15 per share.

On September 29, 2004, we issued 100,000 shares of restricted Series B
Preferred stock to an investor as security in exchange for lending collateral to
support a letter of credit in lieu of a performance bond on a job in South
Carolina. Upon successful completion of this job, the security shares will be
returned to the Company.

Also on September 28, 2004, we issued 113,300 shares of restricted
common stock to two investors for compensation in exchange for lending
collateral to support letters of credit in lieu of performance bonds on
remediation jobs in South Carolina. These transactions were valued at $0.30 per
share.

Also, on September 28, 2004, the Company issued 60,000 shares of
restricted common stock to a lender in exchange for extension of the due date of
a note payable. This transaction was valued at $0.33 per share.

On September 9, 2004, we issued 1,000,000 shares of restricted common
stock to a consultant for financing regarding acquisitions. This transaction was
valued at $0.175 per share.

On August 3, 2004, we issued 375,000 shares of restricted common stock
to Richardson & Patel LLP in settlement of in indebtedness arising from the
provision of legal services to the company. This transaction was valued at $0.25
per share.

                                       20



<PAGE>

On August 4, 2004, the company entered into a loan agreement and
convertible promissory note with Fusion Capital to borrow $200,000 at annual
interest rate of 10%. In connection with the Note, Fusion Capital was issued
warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$.275 per share.

In July 2004, the company issued 649,999 shares of restricted common
stock to four accredited investors, of which 50,000 common shares were sold for
$0.20 per share and 599,999 shares were sold for $0.15 per shares. Total
proceeds to the company were $99,999.

In June 2004, the company issued 173,696 shares of restricted common
stock to four accredited investors, of which 48,696 common shares were sold for
$0.15 per share and 125,000 shares were sold for $0.20 per shares. Total
proceeds to the company were $32,304.

On June 10, 2004, we entered into a common stock purchase agreement
with Fusion Capital Fund II, LLC, pursuant to which Fusion Capital has agreed to
purchase up to an aggregate of $6.0 million of our common stock. As compensation
to Fusion Capital in connection with its purchase commitment under the common
stock purchase agreement, we issued 1,050,000 shares of common stock, of which
1,000,000 was valued at $0.27 per share and 50,000 was valued at $0.37 per
share, and warrants, exercisable for a period of five years, to purchase (i)
500,000 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share, (ii) 500,000 shares of common
stock at $1.00 per share, (iii) 500,000 shares of common stock at $1.50 per
share and (iv) 500,000 shares at $2.00 per share.

In March 2004 the company issued 22,525 shares under a consulting
contract. These shares were valued at approximately $0.33 per share or a total
transaction value of $7,500, which was the fair market value of the services
received.

In March 2004, the company issued 752,800 shares of restricted common
stock to a director in satisfaction of debt owed. The shares of common stock
were valued at $.18 per share or an aggregate of $135,500.

In March 2004, two officers and a director of the Company exercised
options to purchase 168,000 shares of restricted Series A Preferred stock. Each
share of the Preferred stock is convertible into 5 shares of common stock, no
sooner that one year after the date acquired. The options were exercised at
$0.25 per share of Series A Preferred stock. The total value of these
transactions was $42,000 of which $14,000 was offset against debt owed to the
officers and director. And $28,000 was offset against the amount payable to the
parent company.

In March 2004, the company issued 240,000 share of restricted Series A
Preferred stock to an affiliate under a consulting agreement. This transaction
was valued at $0.90 per share of Series A Preferred and had a total value of
$216,000.

In March 2004, the company issued a total of 326,665 shares of
restricted Series A Preferred Stock to its parent company and an affiliate in
exchange for debt owed. These transactions were valued $0.90 per share of Series
A Preferred stock and had a total value of $294,000.

In February 2004, the company issued 10,000 shares of restricted common
stock on behalf of an affiliate under a consulting agreement. This transaction
was valued at $0.50 per share which approximates the value of the services
received.

In February 2004, the company issued 1,173,750 shares of restricted
common stock to five accredited investors, of which 80,000 common shares were
sold for $0.25 per share and 1,093,750 shares were sold for $0.16 per shares.
Total proceeds to the company were $195,000.

In January 2004, the company issued 150,000 shares of restricted common
stock to a consultant for management advisory services. This transactions was
valued at $0.05 per share which approximated the fair market value of the
services received.

In January 2004, the company issued 230,000 shares of restricted common
stock to four accredited investors. These transactions were valued at $0.25 per
share. The company received $57,500 in proceeds from the sales.

ITEM 6.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

CAUTIONARY FORWARD - LOOKING STATEMENT
--------------------------------------

STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THIS MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, AND IN FUTURE FILINGS BY THE COMPANY WITH
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, IN THE COMPANY'S PRESS RELEASES AND IN
ORAL STATEMENTS MADE WITH THE APPROVAL OF AN AUTHORIZED EXECUTIVE OFFICER WHICH
ARE NOT HISTORICAL OR CURRENT FACTS ARE "FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS" AND ARE
SUBJECT TO CERTAIN RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES THAT COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO
DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM HISTORICAL EARNINGS AND THOSE PRESENTLY ANTICIPATED OR
PROJECTED. YOU ARE CAUTIONED NOT TO PLACE UNDUE RELIANCE ON ANY SUCH
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, WHICH SPEAK ONLY AS OF THE DATE MADE. THE FOLLOWING
IMPORTANT FACTORS, AMONG OTHERS, IN SOME CASES HAVE AFFECTED AND IN THE FUTURE
COULD AFFECT THE COMPANY'S ACTUAL RESULTS AND COULD CAUSE THE COMPANY'S ACTUAL
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THAT EXPRESSED IN ANY
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT: (I) THE EXTREMELY COMPETITIVE CONDITIONS THAT
CURRENTLY EXIST IN THE MARKET FOR COMPANIES SIMILAR TO THE COMPANY AND (II) LACK
OR RESOURCES TO MAINTAIN THE COMPANY'S GOOD STANDING STATUS AND REQUISITE
FILINGS WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. THE FOREGOING LIST SHOULD
NOT BE CONSTRUED AS EXHAUSTIVE AND THE COMPANY DISCLAIMS ANY OBLIGATION
SUBSEQUENTLY TO REVISE ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS TO REFLECT EVENTS OR
CIRCUMSTANCES AFTER THE DATE OF SUCH STATEMENTS OR TO REFLECT THE OCCURRENCE OF
ANTICIPATED OR UNANTICIPATED EVENTS. THE FOLLOWING DISCUSSION SHOULD BE READ IN
CONJUNCTION WITH OUR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THEIR EXPLANATORY NOTES INCLUDED
AS PART OF THIS PROSPECTUS.

The Company's wholly owned subsidiary, Sub Surface Waste Management, Inc.,
engages in developing, manufacturing and selling engineered remediation
solutions for clean up of toxic waste releases to soil and/or groundwater and
the bio-recycling of spent activated carbon filtration media. The treatments may
be made directly to the contaminated soil or groundwater in the location at
which the contamination was found ("in situ"), using wells and subsurface
injection/extraction points to administer the Company's proprietary microbial
blends for bioremediation of various waste streams, or the treatments may
require excavation of contaminated soil or pumping of groundwater ("ex situ"),
and washing activated carbon filtration media with microbes to Bio-recycle with
the Company providing technical engineering consultation and microbial blends to
its teaming partners and/or executing the work directly as a contractor.

                                       22



<PAGE>

The Company's plan of operation for the next 12 months is to continue the
existing business in South Carolina, develop new work in the southeast U.S.,
commence booked project work and promote new projects in Mexico, provide
engineering support services for new international water treatment opportunities
and raise additional working capital while seeking the acquisition of additional
companies which can augment the base business of the Company.

The company plans to complete and close at least two of five existing projects
in South Carolina, promote new work in Florida and the southeast U.S. spanning
underground clean-ups from leaking tanks, soil remediation and groundwater
remediation for "brownfield" property restorations and coastal restoration work
to remediate contaminants found in ports and harbors.

In Mexico the company has teamed with its technology licensee Grupo Bartlett,
S.A. de C.V. to execute an existing contract backlog of work and is actively
promoting new projects in the "oil patch" in the northeast states of Mexico,
south of Texas, using its registered technology with SEMARNAT (Mexico EPA).

Through our parent company, U.S. Microbics, Inc., and its joint venture partner
companies, we are providing engineering technical support for commercial water
treatment projects in Latin America with Non Government Organizations (NGO) who
will operate and service the units and be responsible for collecting sales
revenues.

Additional capital must be raised to fund existing and new projects, support
overhead expenses and execute acquisitions to be identified. During the next 12
months, the Company's foreseeable cash requirements are approximately $5,000,000
to implement its business plan in the environmental cleanup business. The
company will most likely need to issue additional common or preferred stock,
which will have a dilutive effect on current shareholders, in order to raise the
necessary capital to continue and expand its operations.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to
make estimates and judgments that affect our reported assets, liabilities,
revenues, and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.
We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various
other assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Future
events, however, may differ markedly from our current expectations and
assumptions. While there are a number of significant accounting policies
affecting our consolidated financial statements; we believe the following
critical accounting policies involve the most complex, difficult and subjective
estimates and judgments:

         o        stock-based compensation.

         o        revenue recognition

                                       23



<PAGE>

Stock-Based Compensation

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148 - Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation - Transition and Disclosure. This statement amends SFAS No. 123 -
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, providing alternative methods of
voluntarily transitioning to the fair market value based method of accounting
for stock based employee compensation. FAS 148 also requires disclosure of the
method used to account for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of
the method in both the annual and interim financial statements. The provisions
of this statement related to transition methods are effective for fiscal years
ending after December 15, 2002, while provisions related to disclosure
requirements are effective in financial reports for interim periods beginning
after December 31, 2002.

The Company elected to continue to account for stock-based compensation plans
using the intrinsic value-based method of accounting prescribed by APB No. 25,
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related interpretations. Under
the provisions of APB No. 25, compensation expense is measured at the grant date
for the difference between the fair value of the stock and the exercise price.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue for product sales is recognized at the time the product is shipped to or
picked up by the customer. Revenues from time and material contracts are
recognized as the services are performed. Revenue for short-term engineering
orremediation services is recognized at the completion of the contract. Sales
under long-term contracts are accounted for under the percentage of completion
method. Revenues are recognized as the actual cost of work performed related to
the estimate at completion. Profits expected to be realized on contracts are
based on the Company's estimates of total contract sales value and costs at
completion. Assumptions used for recording sales and earnings are adjusted in
the period of change to reflect revisions in contract value and estimated costs.
In the period in which it is determined that a loss will be incurred on a
contract, the entire amount of the estimated loss is charged to income.

On some jobs in the state of South Carolina, the estimated cost of completion
has increased during the year ended September 30, 2005 from the original project
estimate, so that the percentage complete (and revenue recognition) is not
increasing in proportion to costs incurred. Therefore, the Balance Sheet item
"Costs and estimated profits in excess of billings" has been increasing at a
higher rate that the revenue recognized using the cost percentage complete
method. The estimated cost to complete on all jobs in reviewed quarterly and
adjustments are made as required.

         Results of Operations For Year Ended September 30, 2005
         -------------------------------------------------------

The company incurred a net loss of $1,627,719 for the year ended September 30,
2005, compared to $3,316,635 for the year ended September 30, 2004. The company
had negative cash flows from operations of $887,591 for the year ended
September 30, 2005, compared to negative cash flows from operations of
$1,251,172 for the year ended September 30, 2004. Basic and diluted net loss per
share was $0.04, for the year ended September 30, 2005 and $0.15 for the year
ended September 30, 2004. Weighted average common shares outstanding increase
from 22,313,409 for the year ended September 30, 2004 to 43,249,462 for the
year ended September 30, 2005.

The company's revenues for year ended September 30, 2005 were $1,094,775
compared to $234,018 for the year ended September 30, 2004, an increase of 368
percent. Revenues for the year ended September 30, 2005, consisted primarily of
bio-remediation of hydro-carbons in contaminated soil for the projects in
Mexico. The company incurred a gross profit for the year ended September 30,
2005 of $287,092 compared to $39,213 gross loss for the year ended September 30,
2004.

The increase in revenues for the year ended September 30, 2005 is due primarily
to the ongoing work on projects in Mexico.

During the year ended September 30, 2005, the company incurred $1,762,396 in
selling, general and administrative expenses, compared to $3,104,724 for the
year ended September 30, 2004. The decrease in selling, general and
administrative expenses of approximately $1,342,328 was primarily due to
decreases in legal, accounting, and payroll expenses.

                                       24



<PAGE>

Depreciation expense for the year ended September 30, 2005 was $13,233 compared
to $5,098 for the year ended September 30, 2004. The increase was due
principally to the purchase of computer systems. Interest expense for the years
September 30, 2005 and 2004 respectively were $141,027 and $171,032. During this
year notes payable decreased by $55,218 and therefore a decrease in
interest expense.

The company is not expecting to increase revenues during the first quarter of
fiscal 2006, and based on the current financial condition of the company,
additional capital will be required in order for the company to maintain its
ongoing operations.

         Liquidity and Capital Resources:
         --------------------------------

As of September 30, 2005, we had a working capital of $430,810 compared to a
$24,893 at September 30, 2004 or a increase of $405,917 in the working capital.
As a result of our operating losses incurred during the year ended September 30,
2005, we generated a cash flow deficit of $887,591 from operating activities.
Cash flows used in investing activities deficit of $ 390,942 during the year
ended 2005. We met our cash requirements during this period through the issuance
of common and preferred stock totaling $ 605,940 and $526,926 in proceeds from
issuance of common stock under the employee stock option plan. Cash totaled $
7,098 as of September 30, 2005.

The company will need to continue to raise funds by various financing methods
such as private placements and its equity line to maintain its operations until
such time as cash generated by operations is sufficient to meet its operating
and capital requirements. There can be no assurance that the company will be
able to raise such capital on terms acceptable to the company, if at all.

While we have raised capital to meet our working capital and financing needs in
the past, however, additional financing is required in order to meet our current
and projected cash flow deficits from operations and development. We have
obtained financing in the form of equity in order to provide the necessary
working capital. On June 10, 2004, we entered into a Common Stock Purchase
Agreement with Fusion Capital Fund II, LLC ("Fusion") a Chicago-based
institutional investor. Under terms of the agreement, Fusion has agreed to
purchase from the company up to $6.0 million of our common stock over a 24-month
period. Since the Securities & Exchange Commission declared effective a
registration statement covering the securities issued or issue able to Fusion on
November 9, 2004, each month the company has the right to sell to Fusion up to
$250,000 of its common stock at a purchase price based upon the market price of
the company's common stock on the date of each sale without any fixed discount
to the market price. The company's may also require Fusion to purchase lesser or
greater amounts of its common stock each month up to $6.0 million in the
aggregate. The company has the right to control the timing and the amount of
stock sold to Fusion Capital. The company has the right to terminate the
agreement at any time without any additional cost. The company also has the
right, at its election to enter into a new agreement with Fusion Capital under
which Fusion would be required to purchase up to an additional $6.0 million of
the company's common stock on the same terms and conditions as the original
agreement.

In addition, on August 4, 2004, the company entered into a loan agreement and
convertible promissory note with Fusion Capital to borrow $200,000 at annual
interest rate of 10%. The Note matured on January 31, 2005, and may be redeemed
by us, subject to Fusion Capital's right to convert any outstanding principal
and accrued interest due into our common shares. The Note shall convert at a
price equal to the lesser of (i) 50% of the average of the three (3) lowest
closing sale prices of the common shares during the twelve (12) trading days
prior to the submission of a conversion notice or (ii) $0.25 per share. In
connection with the Note, Fusion Capital was issued 250,000 warrants with an
exercise price of $.275 per share.. If the Note is converted, the company may
issue more than 840,000 shares of our common stock to Fusion Capital, including
interest as of the conversion date. The company has registered up to 1,500,000
in connection with the conversion of the Note to preserve its option to utilize
its cash resources for purposes other than paying down the Note.

>From and after the maturity date or after the occurrence of an event of default
under the Note, the interest rate shall be increased to fifteen percent (15%)
and shall be calculated in accordance with the terms of the Note. At any time
after the maturity date, the company shall redeem Note for cash equal to 125% of
the outstanding principal plus accrued interest.

The company has relied mostly on cash infusions from its parent company, U.S.
Microbics, Inc., and the sale of its common stock during the first six years of
its existence. Its parent company has limited resources and may not be able to
continue to provide sufficient funds for SSWM to successfully continue its
operations.

There can be no assurance that the company will generate revenues from
operations or obtain sufficient capital on acceptable terms, if at all. Failure
to obtain such capital or generate such operating revenues would have an adverse
impact on the company's financial position and results of operations and ability
to continue as a going concern.

                                       25



<PAGE>

The company's operating and capital requirements during the next fiscal year and
thereafter will vary based on a number of factors, including: (i) the rate at
which microbial products are shipped and generate profits; (ii) the necessary
level of sales and marketing activities for environmental products; and (iii)
the level of effort needed to develop additional distribution channels to the
point of commercial viability.

There can be no assurance that additional private or public financing, including
debt or equity financing, will be available as needed, or, if available, on
terms favorable to the company. Any additional equity financing may be dilutive
to shareholders and such additional equity securities may have rights,
preferences or privileges that are senior to those of the company's existing
Common or Preferred Stock. Furthermore, debt financing, if available, will
require payment of interest and may involve restrictive covenants that could
impose limitations on the operating flexibility of the company. The failure of
the company to successfully obtain additional future funding may jeopardize the
company's ability to continue its business and operations.

During fiscal year ended September 30, 2005, the Company projects expenditures
for plant and equipment of approximately from $500,000 to $750,000 and research
and development costs of less than $150,000, assuming the company raises
projected capital.

The independent auditor's report on the company's September 30, 2005 financial
statements included in this Annual Report states that the company's recurring
losses raise substantial doubts about the company's ability to continue as a
going concern.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements
--------------------------------

In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS
151, INVENTORY COSTS-- AN AMENDMENT OF ARB NO. 43, CHAPTER 4. This Statement
amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, "Inventory Pricing," to clarify
the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling
costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Paragraph 5 of ARB 43, Chapter 4,
previously stated that ". . . under some circumstances, items such as idle
facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and rehandling costs may
be so abnormal as to require treatment as current period charges. . . ." This
Statement requires that those items be recognized as current-period charges
regardless of whether they meet the criterion of "so abnormal." In addition,
this Statement requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the
costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production
facilities. This Statement is effective for inventory costs incurred during
fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Management does not believe the
adoption of this Statement will have any immediate material impact on the
Company.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No.152, "Accounting for Real Estate
Time-Sharing Transactions--an amendment of FASB Statements No. 66 and 67" ("SFAS
152) The amendments made by Statement 152 This Statement amends FASB Statement
No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, to reference the financial
accounting and reporting guidance for real estate time-sharing transactions that
is provided in AICPA Statement of Position (SOP) 04-2, Accounting for Real
Estate Time-Sharing Transactions. This Statement also amends FASB Statement No.
67, Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects,
to state that the guidance for (a) incidental operations and (b) costs incurred
to sell real estate projects does not apply to real estate time-sharing
transactions. The accounting for those operations and costs is subject to the
guidance in SOP 04-2. This Statement is effective for financial statements for
fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. with earlier application encouraged.
The Company does not anticipate that the implementation of this standard will
have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.

On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")
published Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004),
SHARE-BASED PAYMENT ("SFAS 123R"). SFAS 123R requires that compensation cost
related to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial
statements. Share-based payment transactions within the scope of SFAS 123R

                                  26



<PAGE>

Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
--------------------------------------------

include stock options, restricted stock plans, performance-based awards, stock
appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. The provisions of SFAS
123R are effective as of the first interim period that begins after June 15,
2005. Accordingly, the Company will implement the revised standard in the third
quarter of fiscal year 2005. Currently, the Company accounts for its share-based
payment transactions under the provisions of APB 25, which does not necessarily
require the recognition of compensation cost in the financial statements.
Management is assessing the implications of this revised standard, which may
materially impact the Company's results of operations in the third quarter of
fiscal year 2005 and thereafter.

On December 16, 2004, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 153, EXCHANGES OF NONMONETARY ASSETS, AN AMENDMENT OF APB OPINION NO. 29,
ACCOUNTING FOR NONMONETARY TRANSACTIONS (" SFAS 153"). This statement amends APB
Opinion 29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar
productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of
nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. Under SFAS 153, if a
nonmonetary exchange of similar productive assets meets a commercial-substance
criterion and fair value is determinable, the transaction must be accounted for
at fair value resulting in recognition of any gain or loss. SFAS 153 is
effective for nonmonetary transactions in fiscal periods that begin after June
15, 2005. The Company does not anticipate that the implementation of this
standard will have a material impact on its financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are
reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition,
changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations,
liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources and would be considered
material to investors.

Inflation
Our opinion is that inflation has not had a material effect on our operations.

                                       27



<PAGE>

ITEM 7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                       FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES

                          SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004

                 SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.



<PAGE>

                 SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.

                          Index to Financial Statements

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                       Page No.
                                                                       --------

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm                  F-3

Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2005 and 2004               F-4

Consolidated Statements of Losses for the years ended
  September 30, 2005 and 2004                                            F-5

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for
  the years ended September 30, 2005 and 2004                         F-6 - F-7

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
  September 30, 2005 and 2004                                            F-8

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                           F-9 - F-26

                                      F-2



<PAGE>

                    RUSSELL BEDFORD STEFANOU MIRCHANDANI LLP
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

             REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors
Sub Surface Waste Management of Delaware, Inc.
Carlsbad, CA

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sub Surface
Waste Management of Delaware, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary (the
"Company") as of September 30, 2005 and 2004 and the related consolidated
statements of losses, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the two years in
the period ended September 30, 2005. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based upon our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatements. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the
Company as of September 30, 2005 and 2004, and the results of its operations and
its cash flows for the two years in the period ended September 30, 2005, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming
that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note O, the
Company has sustained recurring losses from operations and is experiencing
difficulty in generating sufficient cash flow to meet it obligations and sustain
its operations, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as
a going concern. Management's plans in regard to this matter are described in
Note O. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

                               /s/ RUSSELL BEDFORD STEFANOU MIRCHANDANI LLP
                               --------------------------------------------
                                   Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP
                                               Certified Public Accountants

New York, New York
December 29, 2005

                                      F-3



<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                   SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.
                                             CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                                             SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004

                                                                                          2005              2004
                                                                                     -------------     -------------
<S>                                                                                  <C>               <C>
ASSETS
     CURRENT ASSETS:
     Cash and cash equivalents                                                       $      7,098      $        612
     Restricted cash (Note C)                                                              35,573           122,442
     Accounts receivable, net                                                             191,823            25,501
     Due from affiliates                                                                  765,865           418,319
     Prepaid expenses and other assets                                                      6,075               369
     Costs and estimated profit in excess of billings  (Note B)                           188,174           217,717
                                                                                     -------------     -------------
         TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS                                                           1,194,608           784,960

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT (Note D)
     Office furniture and equipment                                                        27,137            26,180
     Manufacturing equipment                                                               56,836             5,147
     Vehicle                                                                                8,851             8,851
                                                                                     -------------     -------------
                                                                                           92,824            40,178
Less: accumulated depreciation                                                            (24,738)          (11,505)
                                                                                     -------------     -------------
                                                                                           68,086            28,673

OTHER ASSETS                                                                               54,069             2,919
                                                                                     -------------     -------------
         TOTAL ASSETS                                                                $  1,316,763      $    816,552
                                                                                     =============     =============

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
     Accounts payable and accrued liabilities, net (Note  E)                         $    363,449      $    316,102
          Due to affiliates, net                                                          114,199           102,597
   Notes payable - current portion (Note F)                                               286,150           341,368
                                                                                     -------------     -------------
         TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES                                                        763,798           760,067

                                                                                     -------------     -------------
         TOTAL LIABILITIES                                                                763,798           760,067
                                                                                     -------------     -------------

Commitments and Contingencies (Note L)

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
     Convertible preferred stock, $.001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized:
         Series A; 15,000,000 shares authorized; 5,812,665 and 5,734,665 issued
         and outstanding as of September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively
         aggregate liquidation preference $58,126,650 and $57,346,650, respectively         5,813             5,735
     Convertible preferred stock, $.001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized:
         Series B; 5,000,000 shares authorized; 150,000 issued and outstanding
         as of September 30, 2005 and 2004,
         aggregate liquidation preference $1,500,000                                          150               150
     Non-Convertible preferred stock, $.001 par value;
         Series S; 20,000,000 shares authorized; 20,000,000 and 0,
         issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively
         aggregate liquidation preference $20,000,000 and $ 0, respectively                20,000                --

   Common stock; $.001 par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized;
        62,877,460 and 35,860,574 shares issued and outstanding at September 30,
        2005 and 2004, respectively                                                        62,877            35,861
     Additional paid-in capital                                                        13,161,570        11,096,865
     Stock Subscription Receivable                                                         (2,600)               --
     Deferred equity issuance cost (Note G)                                              (768,500)         (783,500)
     Deferred financing costs (Note G)                                                   (184,270)         (184,270)
     Accumulated deficit                                                              (11,742,075)      (10,114,356)
                                                                                     -------------     -------------
     TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY                                                           552,965            56,485
                                                                                     -------------     -------------
         TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY                                  $  1,316,763      $    816,552
                                                                                     =============     =============

            (The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements)

                                                        F-4



<PAGE>

                    SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.
                          CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF LOSSES
                   FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004

                                                           2005              2004
                                                      -------------     -------------
Revenues                                              $  1,094,775      $    234,018

Cost of revenues                                           807,683           273,231
                                                      -------------     -------------

Gross profit (loss)                                        287,092           (39,213)

Operating Expenses:
     Selling, general and administrative expenses        1,762,396         3,104,724
     Depreciation                                           13,233             5,098
                                                      -------------     -------------
Total operating expenses                                1, 775,629         3,109,822

Loss from operations                                    (1,488,537)       (3,149,035)

Other income (expense):
     Interest income                                         1,845             3,432
     Interest expense                                     (141,027)         (171,032)
                                                      -------------     -------------
Total other expense                                       (139,182)         (167,600)

Loss before income taxes                                (1,627,719)       (3,316,635)

Income tax expense                                              --                --
                                                      -------------     -------------

Net loss                                              $ (1,627,719)     $ (3,316,635)

Net loss per common share (basic and diluted)                (0.04)            (0.15)
                                                      =============     =============

Weighted average common shares outstanding              43,249,462        22,313,409
                                                      =============     =============

     (The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements)

                                         F-5



<PAGE>

                                           SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.
                                    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
                                             FOR THE TWO YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005

                                                                                                Deferred
                                                                      Additional   Deferred     Equity
                         Preferred Stock           Common Stock        Paid-in    Financing     Issuance    Accumulated
                       Shares      Amount      Shares       Amount     Capital     Costs         Costs        Deficit        Total
                    -----------   -------   -----------   -------    ----------  ---------     ---------  ------------    ----------
Balance at
  October 1,
  2003               5,360,000    $5,360    17,490,784    $17,491   $ 6,312,221  $     --      $      --  $ (6,797,721)   $(462,649)

Shares issued in
  exchange for
  cash, net of
  finder cost
  of $21,500                --        --     3,367,445      3,367       557,436         --            --            --      560,803
Shares issued to
  employees as
  stock bonus               --        --       545,000        545       144,205         --            --            --      144,750

Shares issued to
  consultants for
  services                  --        --     2,633,178      2,633       589,983         --            --            --      592,616
Shares issued to
  related parties
  for settlement
  of notes
  payable
  and accrued
  interest                  --        --       862,800        863       154,637         --            --            --      155,500
Shares issued to
  note holders
  for settlement
  of notes
  payable
  and accrued
  interest                  --        --     5,669,700      5,670       868,179         --            --            --      873,849
Shares issued to
  a vendor
  for settlement
  of outstanding
  invoices                  --        --       441,667        442       133,308         --            --            --      133,750
Shares issued to
  for acquisition
  of 50% interest
  in equipments
  for lease                 --        --     2,000,000      2,000       398,000         --            --            --      400,000
Commons shares
  issued upon
  conversion of
  preferred A
  stocks              (360,000)     (360)    1,800,000      1,800        (1,440)        --            --            --           --
Shares issued as
  commitment
  shares for
  equity line               --        --     1,050,000      1,050       287,450         --      (288,500)           --           --
Value of warrants
  for 2,000,000
  commons shares
  issued for
  Equity line               --        --            --         --       495,000         --      (495,000)           --           --
Value of warrants
  for 250,000
  commons shares
  issued for
  note payable
  for $200,000              --        --            --         --        67,500         --            --            --       67,500
Financing
  expenses
  related to
  convertible
  note payable
  for $ 650,000             --        --            --         --       315,000         --            --            --      315,000
Financing
  expenses
  related to
  convertible
  note payable
  for $ 200,000             --        --            --         --        40,000         --            --            --       40,000
Preferred Series
  A issued to
  related parties
  for settlement
  of due to
  related parties      326,665       327            --         --       293,673         --            --            --      294,000
Preferred Series
  A issued to
  a related party
  for consulting
  services             240,000       240            --         --       215,760         --            --            --      216,000

                                                               F-6a



<PAGE>

Preferred Series
  A issued to

  employees upon
  exercise of
  options              168,000       168            --         --        41,832         --            --            --       42,000
Preferred Series
  B issued as
  collateral for
  letters of
  credit               150,000       150                                184,120   (184,270)           --            --           --

Net loss                    --        --            --         --            --         --            --    (3,316,635)  (3,316,635)
                    -----------   -------   -----------   -------   -----------  ----------   ----------  -------------  -----------
Balance at
  September 30,
  2004               5,884,665    $5,885    35,860,574    $35,861   $11,096,864  $(184,270)   $ (783,500) $(10,114,356)  $   56,484
                    ===========   =======   ===========   =======   ===========  ==========   =========== =============  ===========

                                                              F-6b



<PAGE>

                                           SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.
                                    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
                                             FOR THE TWO YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005

                                                                                               Deferred
                                                                        Additional   Deferred   Equity
                        Preferred Stock          Common Stock   Sub      Paid-in    Financing  Issuance   Accumulated
                    Shares      Amount     Shares     Amount   Receiv    Capital      Costs      Costs      Deficit       Total
                  -----------  --------  ----------  -------  -------  -----------  ---------  ---------  ------------  -----------
  Total brought
   forward          5,884,665  $  5,885  35,860,574  $35,861  $    --  $11,096,864  $(184,270) $(783,500) $(10,114,356) $    56,484

Shares issued
for cash                   --        --  12,615,957   12,616       --      593,323         --         --            --      605,939
Shares issued in
  exchange for
  a finder's fee           --        --     375,000      375       --         (375)        --         --            --           --
Shares issued for
  employee stock
  option plan              --        --   4,654,000    4,654       --      522,274         --         --            --      526,928
Shares issued to
  employees for
  bonus at 0.35            --        --     246,000      246       --       85,854         --         --            --       86,100

Shares issued to
  employee for
  payroll                  --        --     509,615      510       --       40,260         --         --            --       40,770

Shares issued for
 Settlement of accounts
  payable                  --        --   1,090,429    1,090       --      160,391         --         --            --      161,481

Shares issued to
  consultants for
  services                 --        --   1,371,032    1,371       --      173,654         --         --            --      175,025

Shares issued for
  note payable
  and interest
  expense                  --        --   4,903,498    4,903       --      274,680         --         --            --      279,583

Shares issued for
  accrued expenses         --        --     781,700      782       --       46,118         --         --            --       46,900

Common stock
  issued for
  deposit to
  Water Machines           --        --      83,334       83       --        9,917         --         --            --       10,000

Common stock
  issued for
  stock subscription
  receivable               --        --       41,666      41   (5,000)       4,959         --         --            --           --
Cash received
  for stock
  subscription
  receivable                                                    2,400                                                         2,400
Shares issued for
  a partial
  payment
  on advance from
  Fusion at 0.232
  per share                --        --      64,655       65       --       14,935         --         --            --       15,000
Value of options
  for 1,400,000
  commons shares
  issued for
  consulting
  expenses                 --        --          --       --       --      120,574         --         --            --      120,574
Commons shares
  issued upon
  conversion of
  preferred A
  stocks              (56,000)      (56)    280,000      280       --         (224)        --         --            --           --

Cash received and
  Restricted
  Series A
  options
  exercised             5,000         5          --       --       --        1,245         --         --            --        1,250
Preferred Series
  A issued to
  a related party
  for consulting
  services              8,000         8          --       --       --        1,992         --         --            --        2,000
Preferred Series
  A issued to
  employees upon
  exercise of
  options             121,000       121          --       --       --       30,129         --         --            --       30,250
Preferred Series
  S issued to
  U.S.Microbics    20,000,000    20,000          --       --       --           --         --         --            --       20,000
Shares issued
  for deferred
  issuance cost            --        --          --       --       --      (15,000)        --     15,000            --           --

Net loss                   --        --          --       --       --           --         --         --    (1,627,719)  (1,627,719)
                  -----------  --------  ----------  -------  -------  -----------  ---------  ---------  ------------  -----------
Balance at
  September 30,
  2005             25,962,665  $ 25,963  62,877,460  $62,877  $(2,600) $13,161,570  $(184,270) $(768,500) $(11,742,075) $   552,965
                  ===========  ========  ==========  =======  ======== ===========  ========== ========== ============= ============

                             (The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements)

                                                                F-7



<PAGE>

                               SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.
                                   CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                              FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004

                                                                                   2005           2004
                                                                               ------------   ------------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss                                                                       $(1,627,719)   $(3,316,635)
     Adjustment to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities:
        Depreciation and amortization                                               13,233         26,473
        Investment write off                                                       150,000        400,000
        Interest expense accruals                                                       --         40,000
        Interest expense credited to Notes Payable                                  96,573             --
        Preferred stocks issued for consulting expenses                              2,000        216,000
        Beneficial conversion on notes payable amortized                            72,792        328,333
        Issuance of stock for bonus or payroll                                     126,870             --
        Common stock issued in exchange for services                               175,024        592,616
        Stock options issued in exchange for services                              120,574             --
     Decrease (increase) in:
        Accounts receivable                                                       (166,322)        43,148
        Cost and estimated profit in excess of billing                              29,543        (61,660)
        Restricted cash                                                             86,869        136,026
        Prepaid expenses and other current assets                                 (191,150)        22,861
        Other current assets                                                        (5,706)          (250)
Increase (decrease) in:
        Accounts payable and accrued expenses                                      229,828        321,916
                                                                               ------------   ------------
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES                                             (887,591)    (1,251,172)
                                                                               ------------   ------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
     Purchase of property and equipment                                            (52,646)       (18,519)
     Payments for due from affiliates                                             (338,296)      (388,319)
                                                                               ------------   ------------
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES                                             (390,942)      (406,838)
                                                                               ------------   ------------

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
     (Repayment of) proceeds from parent and affiliates                             78,503       (129,213)
     Proceeds from notes payable                                                    70,000      1,060,043
     Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net                                   605,940        705,554
     Issuance of common stock under employee stock option plan                     526,926             --
     Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock                                       1,250             --
     Proceeds from stock subscription receivable                                     2,400             --
                                                                               ------------   ------------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES                                        1,285,019      1,636,384
                                                                               ------------   ------------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH                                                      6,486        (21,626)
CASH AT BEGINNING OF YEAR                                                              612         22,238
                                                                               ------------   ------------
CASH AT END OF YEAR                                                            $     7,098    $       612
                                                                               ============   ============

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

     Common stocks issued in exchange for services                                 175,024        592,616
     Common stocks issued to employees for services                                126,870             --
     Common stock issued for deposits                                               10,000             --
     Preferred stocks issued in exchange for services                                2,000        216,000
     Preferred stocks issued in settlement of accrued expenses                      30,250             --
     Common stock issued in exchange for due to affiliate                               --        155,500
     Common stock issued in settlement of notes payable and accrued interest       279,583        873,849
     Preferred stock issued as deferred financing costs                                 --        182,470
     Preferred stock issued for repayment of due to affiliates                          --        336,000
     Common stock issued in settlement of accounts payable and accrued expenses    208,381        133,750
     Common stock issued to acquire investments for lease                               --        400,000
     Common stock issued as deferred equity issue costs                                 --        288,500
     Common stock issued in settlement of advances                                  15,000             --
     Stock options issued in exchange for services                                 120,574             --
     Stock subscriptions receivable                                                  5,000             --

CASH PAID FOR:
     Interest                                                                  $        --    $        --
     Income taxes                                                              $        --    $        --

        (The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements)

                                                   F-8

</TABLE>


<PAGE>

                 SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004

NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES

A summary of the significant accounting policies applied in the preparation of
the accompanying financial statements follows.

Business and Basis of Presentation
----------------------------------

Sub Surface Waste Management of Delaware, Inc. ("the Company") was formed under
the laws of the State of Utah in January, 1986 and re-domiciled to the State of
Delaware in February, 2001. The Company designs, installs and operates
proprietary soil and groundwater remediation systems.

The consolidated financial statements include the companies which are
effectively controlled directly by the Company, where control is defined as the
power to govern the financial and operating policies. This control is generally
evidenced when the Company directly or indirectly owns more than 50% or the
voting rights of the company's share capital. Significant intercompany
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior period amounts
have been reclassified for comparative purposes.

As of September 30, 2005 and 2004, U.S. Microbics, Inc., and subsidiaries
("Parent" or "Affiliates") control approximately 89.3% and 60%, respectively, of
the outstanding stock of the Company.

Cash and Cash Equivalents
-------------------------

Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of cash on deposit, certificates of
deposit, and money market accounts readily convertible into cash and purchased
with original maturities of three months or less.

Accounts Receivable
-------------------

The Company has elected to record bad debts using the direct write-off method.
Generally accepted accounting principles require that the allowance method be
used to recognize bad debts; however, the effect of using the direct write-off
method is not materially different from the results that would have been
obtained under the allowance method.

Property and Equipment
----------------------

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions
and improvements are capitalized, and minor replacements, maintenance, and
repairs are charged to expenses as incurred. When property and equipment are
retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are
removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in the
results of operations for the respective period. Depreciation is provided over
the estimated useful lives of the related assets using the straight-line method
for financial statement purpose. The estimated useful lives for significant
property and equipment categories are as follows:

Computer Equipment         5 years
Machinery and equipment    7 years
Vehicles                   5 years

Long-Lived Assets
-----------------

The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144
(SFAS 144). The Statement requires that long-lived assets and certain
identifiable intangibles held and used by the Company be reviewed for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
an asset may not be recoverable. Events relating to recoverability may include
significant unfavorable changes in business conditions, recurring losses, or a
forecasted inability to achieve break-even operating results over an extended
period. The Company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets based upon
forecasted undercounted cash flows. Should impairment in value be indicated, the
carrying value of intangible assets will be adjusted, based on estimates of
future discounted cash flows resulting from the use and ultimate disposition of
the asset. SFAS No. 144 also requires assets to be disposed of be reported at
the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell.

                                      F-9



<PAGE>

                 SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004

NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Research and Development
------------------------

The Company accounts for research and development costs in accordance with the
Financial Accounting Standards Board's Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 2 ("SFAS 2"), "Accounting for Research and Development Costs.
Under SFAS 2, all research and development costs must be charged to expense as
incurred. Accordingly, internal research and development costs are expensed as
incurred. Third-party research and developments costs are expensed when the
contracted work has been performed or as milestone results have been achieved.
Company-sponsored research and development costs related to both present and
future products are expensed in the period incurred. The Company incurred
research and product development costs of $0 and $25,000 for the years ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Income Taxes
------------

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax
consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases. Deferred tax assets, including tax loss and credit carryforwards, and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable
income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be
recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of
change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date. Deferred income tax expense represents the change during the
period in the deferred tax assets and deferred liabilities. The components of
the deferred tax assets and liabilities are individually classified as current
and non-current based on their characteristics. Deferred tax assets are reduced
by a valuation allowance when, in opinion of management, it is more likely than
not some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

The Company currently has substantial net operating loss carryforwards. The
Company has recorded a 100% valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets
due to uncertainty of their ultimate realization.

Net Loss Per Common Share
-------------------------

The Company computes earnings per share under Financial Accounting Standard No.
128, "Earnings Per Share" (SFAS 128). Net loss per common share is computed by
dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and
dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding during the year. Dilutive common
stock equivalents consist of shares issuable upon conversion of convertible
preferred shares and the exercise of the Company's stock options and warrants
(calculated using the treasury stock method). During 2005 and 2004, common stock
equivalents are not considered in the calculation of the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding because they would be anti-dilutive, thereby
decreasing the net loss per common share.

Use of Estimates
----------------

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly actual results
could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition
-------------------

Revenue for product sales is recognized at the time the product is shipped to or
picked up by the customer. Revenues from time and materials contracts are
recognized as the services are performed. Revenue for short-term engineering or
remediation services is recognized at the completion of the contract. Sales
under long-term contracts are accounted for under the percentage of completion
method. Revenues are recognized as the actual cost of work performed related to
the estimate at completion. Profits expected to be realized on contracts are
based on the Company's estimates of total contract sales value and costs at
completion. Assumptions used for recording sales and earnings are adjusted in
the period of change to reflect revisions in contract value and estimated costs.
In the period in which it is determined that a loss will be incurred on a
contract, the entire amount of the estimated loss is charged to income.

The asset, "Cost and estimated profit in excess of billings" represents revenue
recognized in excess of amounts billed.

                                      F-10



<PAGE>

                 SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004

NOTE A - SUMMARY OFACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Advertising
-----------

Advertising and sales promotion costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising
expense totaled $117 for both the years ended September 30, 2005 and 2004.

Reclassifications
-----------------

Certain reclassifications have been made in prior year's financial statements to
conform to classifications used in the current year. These reclassifications had
no affect on previously reported results of operations or retained earnings.

Liquidity
---------

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has incurred a
net loss of $1,627,719 and $3,316,635 during the years ended September 30, 2005
and 2004, respectively. The Company's current assets exceeded its current
liabilities by $430,810 and $24,893, as of September 30, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.

Concentrations of Credit Risk
-----------------------------

Financial instruments and related items, which potentially subject the Company
to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents
and related party receivables. The Company places its cash and temporary cash
investments with credit quality institutions. At times, such investments may be
in excess of the FDIC insurance limit. The Company periodically reviews its
trade receivables in determining its allowance for doubtful accounts. The
allowance for doubtful accounts was $0 at September 30, 2005 and 2004.

Stock Based Compensation
------------------------

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation-Transition and Disclosure-an amendment of SFAS 123." This statement
amends SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," to provide
alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based
method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this
statement amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require
prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the
method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the
method used on reported results. The Company has chosen to continue to account
for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in APB
Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations. Accordingly, compensation expense
for stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the fair market value of
the Company's stock at the date of the grant over the exercise price of the
relat ed option. The Company has adopted the annual disclosure provisions of
SFAS No. 148 in its financial reports for the years ended September 30, 2005 and
2004.

Had compensation costs for the Company's stock options been determined based on
the fair value at the grant dates for the awards, the Company's net loss and
losses per share would have been as follows (transactions involving stock
options issued to employees and Black-Scholes model assumptions are presented in
Note H):

<TABLE>
                                                                    For the years ended
                                                                        September 30,
                                                                     2005          2004
                                                              ------------   ------------
<S>                                                             <C>            <C>
Net loss - as reported                                          $(1,627,719)   $(3,316,635)
Add: Total stock based employee compensation expense as
     reported under intrinsic value method (APB. No. 25)                 --             --
Deduct: Total stock based employee compensation expense
     as reported under fair value based method (SFAS No. 123)            --         62,940
                                                                ------------   ------------
Net loss - Pro Forma                                            $(1,627,719)   $(3,379,575)
                                                                ============   ============

Net loss attributable to common stockholders - Pro forma        $(1,627,719)   $(3,379,575)
Basic (and assuming dilution) loss per share - as reported      $     (0.04)   $     (0.15)
Basic (and assuming dilution) loss per share - Pro forma        $     (0.04)   $     (0.15)

                                            F-11

</TABLE>


<PAGE>

                 SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004

NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Comprehensive Income
--------------------

The company had no items of other comprehensive income in any period presented.
Therefore, net loss as presented in the Company's Statements of losses equal
comprehensive loss.

Segment Information
-------------------

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, Disclosures about Segments
of an Enterprise and Related Information (SFAS 131) establishes standards for
reporting information regarding operating segments in annual financial
statements and requires selected information for those segments to be presented
in interim financial reports issued to stockholders. SFAS 131 also establishes
standards for related disclosures about products and services and geographic
areas. Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about
which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the
chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in making decisions
how to allocate resources and assess performance. The information disclosed
herein, materially represents all of the financial information related to the
Company's principal operating segment.

Contingencies
-------------

Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued,
which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when
one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company's management and
its legal counsel assess such contingent liabilities, and such assessment
inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies
related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted
claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company's legal counsel
evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as
well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be
sought therein.

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material
loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then
the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company's financial statements.
If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not
probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated,
then the nature of the contingent liability, together with an estimate of the
range of possible loss if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they
involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.

Financial Instruments
---------------------

The Company's financial instruments are cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable, notes payable, and long-term debt. The recorded
values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable
approximate their fair values based on their short-term nature. The recorded
values of notes payable and long-term debt approximate their fair values, as
interest approximates market rates.

New Accounting Pronouncements
-----------------------------

In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS
151, INVENTORY COSTS-- AN AMENDMENT OF ARB NO. 43, CHAPTER 4. This Statement
amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, "Inventory Pricing," to clarify
the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling
costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Paragraph 5 of ARB 43, Chapter 4,
previously stated that ". . . under some circumstances, items such as idle
facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and re-handling costs may
be so abnormal as to require treatment as current period charges. . . ." This
Statement requires that those items be recognized as current-period charges
regardless of whether they meet the criterion of "so abnormal." In addition,
this Statement requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the
costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production
facilities. This Statement is effective for inventory costs incurred during
fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Management does not believe the
adoption of this Statement will have any immediate material impact on the
Company.

                                      F-12



<PAGE>

                 SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004

NOTE A - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

New Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
-----------------------------------------

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No.152, "Accounting for Real Estate
Time-Sharing Transactions--an amendment of FASB Statements No. 66 and 67" ("SFAS
152) The amendments made by Statement 152 This Statement amends FASB Statement
No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, to reference the financial
accounting and reporting guidance for real estate time-sharing transactions that
is provided in AICPA Statement of Position (SOP) 04-2, Accounting for Real
Estate Time-Sharing Transactions. This Statement also amends FASB Statement No.
67, Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects,
to state that the guidance for (a) incidental operations and (b) costs incurred
to sell real estate projects does not apply to real estate time-sharing
transactions. The accounting for those operations and costs is subject to the
guidance in SOP 04-2. This Statement is effective for financial statements for
fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. with earlier application encouraged.
The Compan y does not anticipate that the implementation of this standard will
have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.

On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")
published Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004),
SHARE-BASED PAYMENT ("SFAS 123R"). SFAS 123R requires that compensation cost
related to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial
statements. Share-based payment transactions within the scope of SFAS 123R
include stock options, restricted stock plans, performance-based awards, stock
appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. The provisions of SFAS
123R are effective as of the first interim period that begins after June 15,
2005. Accordingly, the Company will implement the revised standard in the third
quarter of fiscal year 2005. Currently, the Company accounts for its share-based
payment transactions under the provisions of APB 25, which does not necessarily
require the recognition of compensation cost in the financial statements.
Management is assessing the implications of this revised standard, which may
materially impact t he Company's results of operations in the third quarter of
fiscal year 2005 and thereafter.

On December 16, 2004, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 153, EXCHANGES OF NONMONETARY ASSETS, AN AMENDMENT OF APB OPINION NO. 29,
ACCOUNTING FOR NONMONETARY TRANSACTIONS (" SFAS 153"). This statement amends APB
Opinion 29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar
productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of
nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. Under SFAS 153, if a
nonmonetary exchange of similar productive assets meets a commercial-substance
criterion and fair value is determinable, the transaction must be accounted for
at fair value resulting in recognition of any gain or loss. SFAS 153 is
effective for nonmonetary transactions in fiscal periods that begin after June
15, 2005. The Company does not anticipate that the implementation of this
standard will have a material impact on its financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.

FASB Interpretation No. 47 ("FIN 47") "Accounting for Conditional Asset
Retirement Obligations" was issued by the FASB in March 2005. FIN 47 provides
guidance relating to the identification of and financial reporting for legal
obligations to perform an asset retirement activity. The Interpretation requires
recognition of a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement
obligation when incurred if the liability's fair value can be reasonably
estimated. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending
after December 15, 2005. The Company does not expect adoption of FIN 47 to have
a material effect on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

In May 2005, SFAS No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections," ("SFAS
No. 154"), was issued, which replaces APB Opinion No. 20, "Accounting Changes,"
and SFAS No. 3, "Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements."
Among other changes, SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application of a
voluntary change in accounting principle to prior period financial statements
presented on the new accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to
determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the
change. SFAS No. 154 also requires accounting for a change in method of
depreciating or amortizing a long-lived non-financial asset as a change in
accounting estimate (prospectively) affected by a change in accounting
principle. Further, the Statement requires that corrections of errors in
previously issued financial statements to be termed a "restatement." The new
standard is effective for accounting changes and error corrections made in
fiscal years beginning after December 15 , 2005. The Company does not expect the
adoption of SFAS No. 154 to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial
Statements.

                                      F-13



<PAGE>

                 SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004

NOTE B - COSTS AND ESTIMATED EARNINGS IN EXCESS OF BILLING

Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts
represent accumulated project expenses and fees which have not been invoiced to
customers as of the date of the consolidated balance sheet. These amounts are
stated at estimated realizable value and aggregated $188,174 and $217,717 at
September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

The Company had one project that has costs exceed the contract amount. The
Company recognized a project loss of $ 8,159. The Company is in the process of
reviewing anticipated costs to complete in an effort to report an appropriate
liability if necessary.

The details of cost of estimated earnings in excess of billing are as follows:

---------------------------------------------  --------------------------
                                                     SEPTEMBER 30,
---------------------------------------------  --------------------------
                                                   2005           2004
---------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------
Cost incurred on contracts and estimated
  earnings to date                             $   784,354   $   707,147
Less: Cumulative billing                           596,180       489,430
---------------------------------------------  ------------  ------------
     Cost and estimated earnings in
         excess of billing                     $   188,174   $   217,717
=============================================  ============  ============

NOTE C - RESTRICTED CASH

As of September 30, 2005, restricted cash consists of one certificate of deposit
$34,942 and accrued interest, which totals $35,573. The certificate of deposit
is pledged as collateral on letter of a credit (see Note L) issued to the State
of South Carolina in lieu of performance bonds on a remediation project for
McGill's Store.

As of September 30, 2004, restricted cash consists of two certificate of
deposits. One certificate of deposit was issued by Community National Bank is
for $87,500 and served as collateral for a letter of credit issued to the State
of South Carolina, on the Off Ramp #83 job in the amount of $175,000. The letter
of credit is dated May 22, 2004 and expired on June 22, 2005.

The second certificate of deposit issued by Bank of America is for $34,942, and
earns interest at the rate of 2.0% per annum, and serves as collateral for a
letter of credit issued to the State of South Carolina, on the McGill's Store
job in the amount of $67,567. The letter of credit is dated September 12, 2005
and expires on September 18, 2006. The certificate of deposit will be released
as collateral for the letter of credit when the McGill's Store job project is
completed, which is expected to occur prior to the expiration of the letter of
credit on September 18, 2006. If necessary, the letter of credit could be
extended if additional time is required to complete the job.

NOTE D - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consisted of the following:

                                                     2005           2004
                                                  ---------       ---------
Manufacturing equipment                           $ 56,836        $  5,147
Office furniture and equipment                      27,137          26,180
Vehicle                                              8,851           8,851
                                                  ---------       ---------
                                                    92,824          40,178
Less: accumulated depreciation                     (24,738)        (11,505)
                                                  ---------       ---------
                                                  $ 68,086        $ 28,673
                                                  =========       =========

Depreciation expense for the years ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 was $13,233
and $5,098, respectively.

                                      F-14



<PAGE>

                 SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004

NOTE E - ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities consisted of the following:

                                                     2005              2004
                                                  ----------       -----------
Accounts payable                                  $  333,884       $   246,841
Accrued expenses
Interest                                              29,565            69,261
                                                  ----------       -----------
                                                  $  363,449       $   316,102
                                                  ==========       ===========

NOTE F - NOTES PAYABLE

Notes payable to related parties at September 30, 2005 and 2004 consists of the
following:

<TABLE>
<S>                                                                               <C>                           <C>
                                                                                  2005                          2004
                                                                                ----------                   ----------

Fusion Capital Note Payable (terms described below)                             $   200,000               $      200,000

Debt discount - beneficial conversion feature, net of accumulated
Amortization of $40,000 and $13,333 as of September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively     --                      (26,667)
(the above amortization contradicts with second to last paragraph of next page)

Debt discount - value attributable to warrants issued with Note, net of
accumulated amortization of $ 67,500 and $21,375 as of
September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively                                               --                      (46,125)

Fusion Capital Advance (terms described below)                                      85,000                          --

Notes payable (2) of $8,150 and $8,500 to the Chief Operating Officer of U.S.
Microbics, Inc.: interest is charged at 10% per annum; unsecured and is payable
on March 8, 2005 and April 17, 2005 respectively. The company is in default under
the terms of this agreement.                                                         1,150                        1,150

Notes payable (2) of $ 50,000 and $ 50,000: interest is charged at 20% per
annum; unsecured and is payable February 2, 2004 and February 3, 2004
respectively.                                                                           --                     100,000

Convertible note payable, interest at 10% per annum, secured by third party
collateral provided by an officer of the Company and due in September 2003;
Note- holder has the option to convert unpaid note principal together with
accrued and unpaid interest to the Company's common stock at the lower of $0.50
per share or 50% of the Company's common stock fair market value of the
Company's common stock based upon a ten day moving average closing price over a
ten (10) day period.                                                                    --                      60,000

Convertible note payable , interest at 10% per annum, secured by third party
collateral provided by an officer of the Company and due in September 2003;
Note-holder has the option to convert unpaid note principal together with
accrued and unpaid interest to the Company's common stock at the lower of $.50
per share or 50% of the Company's common stock fair market value of the
Company's common stock based upon a ten day moving average closing price over a
ten (10) day period.                                                                    --                      45,000

Note payable to an entity controlled by the President of U.S. Microbics, Inc.;
interest is charged at 10% per annum; unsecured and due in April 2005                   --                       8,010

                                                                                ----------                   ----------

Total                                                                              286,150                     341,368
Less: current portion                                                              286,150                     341,368
                                                                                ----------                   ----------
                                                                                $                            $      --
                                                                                ==========                   ==========
</TABLE>

During August 2004, the Company received gross proceeds of $650,000 for a twelve
month convertible note payable bearing 10% interest rate. The noteholder has the
option to convert any unpaid note principal together with accrued and unpaid
interest to the Company's common stock at a rate of $.15 per share.

During September 2004, the note holder exercised the option to convert the note
and accrued interest of $25,000 into 4,500,000 common stock of the Company.

During the year ended September 30, 2005, the Company issued an aggregate of
4,903,498 of common stock to settle certain note payable balances that were
outstanding as of September 30, 2004.

                                      F-15



<PAGE>

                 SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004

NOTE F - NOTES PAYABLE (CONTINUED)

In accordance with Emerging Issue Task Force Issue 98-5, Accounting for
Convertible Securities with a Beneficial Conversion Feature or Contingently
Adjustable Conversion Ratios ("EITF 98- 5"), the Company recognized an imbedded
beneficial conversion feature present in the note. The Company allocated a
portion of the proceeds equal to the intrinsic value of the feature to
additional paid-in capital. The Company recognized and measured and aggregate of
$315,000 of the proceeds, which is equal to the intrinsic value of the embedded
conversion feature, to additional paid-in capital and a charge to operations.

Fusion Capital Note Payable
---------------------------

During August 2004, the Company received gross proceeds of $200,000 for a
convertible note payable bearing 10% interest rate on January 31, 2005. The
Noteholder has the option to convert unpaid note principal together with accrued
and unpaid interest to the Company's common stock at the lower of $0.25 per
share or 50% of the Company's common stock fair market value of the Company's
common stock based upon a twelve day moving average closing price over a ten(12)
day period.

In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 98-5, Accounting for
Convertible Securities with a Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently
Adjustable Conversion Ratios ("EITF 98-5"), the Company recognized an imbedded
beneficial conversion feature present in the note. The Company allocated a
portion of the proceeds equal to the intrinsic value of that feature to
additional paid in capital. The Company recognized and measured an aggregate of
$40,000 of the proceeds, which is equal to the intrinsic value of the imbedded
beneficial conversion feature, to additional paid in capital and a discount
against the Note. The debt discount attributed to the beneficial conversion
feature is amortized over the note's maturity period (180 days) as interest
expense.

The Company amortized $26,667, and $13,333 for the year ended 2005 and 2004 of
the discount associated with the beneficial conversion feature to interest
expense.

In connection with this note, the Company issued detachable warrant granting the
holders the right to acquire 250,000 shares of the Company's common stock at
$.275 per share. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 00-27,
Application of Issue No. 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments ("EITF-0027"),
the Company recognized the value attributable to the warrants in the amount of
$67,500 to additional paid in capital and a discount against the note. The
Company valued the warrants in accordance with EITF 00-27 using the
Black-Scholes pricing model and the following assumptions: contractual terms of
5 years, an average risk free interest rate of 1.03%, a dividend yield of 0%,
and volatility of 141%. The debt discount attributed to the value of the warrant
issued is amortized over the note's maturity period (180 days) as interest
expense.

                                      F-16



<PAGE>

                 SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004

NOTE G - STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY

Equity Line
-----------

On June 10, 2004, the Company entered into a common stock purchase agreement to
sell up to $6 million of the Company's common stock to Fusion Capital Fund, LLC
("Fusion"). Under the terms of the agreement the Company periodically may choose
to sell shares of its common stock to Fusion. If the Company elects to sell
shares to Fusion, then the purchase price for such shares will be the lesser of
(i) the lowest sale price of the common stock on the purchase date; or (ii) the
average of the three (3) lowest closing sale prices of the common stock during
the twelve (12) consecutive trading days prior to the date of a purchase by
Fusion Capital.

The Company has the right to sell to Fusion $250,000 of its common stock, per
Month, at a purchase price based upon the market price of the Company's common
stock on the date of each sale without any fixed discount to the market price.
Under the terms of the common stock purchase agreement Fusion has received
1,000,000 shares of common stock as a commitment fee and 50,000 to cover
expenses in connection with Fusion's due diligence. Unless an event of default
occurs, these shares must be held by Fusion until 24 months from the date of the
common stock purchase agreement or the date the common stock purchase agreement
is terminated. Fusion Capital has also received warrants to purchase: (i)
500,000 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share, (ii) 500,000 shares of common
stock at $1.00 per share, (iii) 500,000 shares of common stock at $1.50 per
share and (iv) 500,000 shares at $2.00 per share. The warrants are exercisable
for a period of five years from issuance.

The Company valued these shares at aggregate of $288,500 based on the market
price. This amount has been capitalized as deferred equity issuance cost, with
an addition to additional paid-in capital, on the Company's financial statements
for the year ending September 30, 2005.

The warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock at prices ranging from
$0.50 to $2.00 per share to Fusion were valued based on the Black-Scholes
calculation model. These warrants are deemed to have a combined value of
$495,000. This amount has been capitalized as deferred equity issuance cost,
with an addition to additional paid-in capital, on the Company's financial
statements for the year ending September 30, 2005.

Fusion Capital Advance
----------------------

During the year ended September 30, 2005, Fusion Capital Fund II, LLC ("Fusion")
made an advance to the Company of $100,000 on the $6,000,000 equity line.
Simultaneously, the Company issued Fusion 64,655 shares of common stock as a
partial repayment of the advance. The shares were valued at approximately $0.232
per share or a total value of $15,000. As of September 30, 2005 the Company owes
Fusion $85,000 regarding the equity line advance. The advance is non-interest
bearing and can be repaid by further issuances of stock to Fusion under the
equity line. As of November 28, 2005, the company would have to issue
approximately shares of 944,000 common stock to repay the advance.

                                      F-17



<PAGE>

                 SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004

NOTE G - STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY

Preferred Stock
---------------

The Company is authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The
Company's preferred stock may be divided into such series as may be established
by the Board of Directors. The preferred stock is convertible at the option of
the holder into common stock at the rate of five shares of common for every one
share of preferred at the option of the holder after one year.

As of September 30, 2005 The Company has issued a new series of stock. The
Company has authorized 20,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock as Series S
Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share. Each share of the Series S
Preferred Stock shall be entitled to twenty votes on all matters submitted to
the stockholders for a vote together with the holders of the Common Stock as a
single class. In addition, the holders of the Series S Preferred Stock shall
have the right to vote, separately as a single class, at a meeting of the
holders of the Series S Preferred Stock or by such holders' written consent or
at any annual or special meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation on any
of the following matters: (i) the creation, authorization, or issuance of any
class or series of shares ranking on a parity with or senior to the Series S
Preferred Stock with respect to dividends or upon the liquidation, dissolution,
or winding up of the Corporation, and (ii) any agreement or other corporate
action which would adversel y affect the powers, rights, or preferences of the
holders of the Series S Preferred Stock.

The holders of record of the Series S Preferred Stock shall be entitled to
receive cumulative dividends at the rate of ten percent per annum on the face
value ($.01 per share) when, if and as declared by the Board of Directors, if
ever. All dividends, when paid, shall be payable in cash, unless any holder of
the Series S Preferred Stock elects to have dividends paid in shares of the
Series S Preferred Stock. Dividends on shares of the Series S Preferred Stock
that have not been redeemed shall be payable quarterly in arrears, when, if and
as declared by the Board of Directors, if ever, on each December 31, March 31,
June 30 and September 30. No dividend or distribution other than a dividend or
distribution paid in Common Stock or in any other junior stock shall be declared
or paid or set aside for payment on the Common Stock or on any other junior
stock unless full cumulative dividends on all outstanding shares of the Series S
Preferred Stock shall have been declared and paid.

Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, whether
voluntary or involuntary, and after payment of any senior liquidation
preferences of any series of Preferred Stock and before any distribution or
payment is made with respect to any Common Stock, holders of each share of the
Series S Preferred Stock shall be entitled to be paid an amount equal in the
greater of (a) the face value denominated thereon subject to adjustment for
stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, reclassification or other
similar events (the "Adjusted Face Value") plus, in the case of each share, an
amount equal to all dividends accrued or declared but unpaid thereon, computed
to the date payment thereof is made available, or (b) such amount per share of
the Series S Preferred Stock immediately prior to such liquidation, dissolution
or winding up, or (c) the liquidation preference of $1.00 per share, and the
holders of the Series S Preferred Stock shall not be entitled to any further
payment, such amount pay able with respect to the Series S Preferred Stock being
sometimes referred to as the "Liquidation Payments."

Series S Preferred Stock shall not be convertible into any other class or series
of the Corporation's securities.

As of September 30, 2005, the Company has issued and outstanding 5,812,665,
150,000 and 20,000,000 shares of convertible preferred Series A, Series B, and
Series S respectively.

Preferred stock transactions during the year ended September 30, 2004:

During year ended September 30, 2004, the Company issued 168,000 shares of
convertible preferred stock series A in exchange for settlement of debt for
$14,000 owed to the officers and director of the Company and $28,000 for debt
owed to parent company upon exercise of 168,000 stock options by employees.

During year ended September 30, 2004, the Company issued 240,000 shares of
convertible preferred stock series A in exchange for services provided by a
related party to the Company valued at $.90 per share which represents the fair
value of the services received which did not differ materially from the value of
the stock issued.

                                      F-18



<PAGE>

                 SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004

NOTE G - STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY (continued)

During year ended September 30, 2004, the Company issued 326,665 shares of
convertible preferred stock series A in settlement of due to related parties for
$294,000.

During year ended September 30, 2004, the stock holders of convertible preferred
stock series A elected to convert 360,000 preferred stock series into 1,800,000
common stocks of the Company.

During year ended September 30, 2004, the Company issued 50,000 shares of Series
B convertible Preferred Stock to a shareholder of the Company as a collateral
for the shareholder providing a $101,000 letter of credit collateralizing the
performance of a contractual obligation of the Company's. The Company has
recognized a $101,000 deferred financing cost in connection with the placement
of the letter of credit. The shareholder will return these preferred stocks to
the Company upon maturity of the outstanding letter of credit.

During year ended September 30, 2004, the Company issued 100,000 shares of
Series B convertible Preferred Stock to a shareholder of the Company as a
collateral for the shareholder providing a $83,270 letter of credit
collateralizing the performance of a contractual obligation of the Company's.
The Company has recognized a $83,270 deferred financing cost in connection with
the placement of the letter of credit. The shareholder will return these
preferred stocks to the Company upon maturity of the outstanding letter of
credit.

Preferred stock transactions during the year ended September 30, 2005:

During the year ended September 30, 2005 the Company issued an aggregate of
121,000 shares of Preferred Series A to employees upon exercise of stock
options. The proceeds for exercise of stock option was used to settle accrued
expenses for a total of $30,250. These shares were valued at a weighted average
of $0.25 per share.

During the year ended September 30, 2005 the Company converted 56,000 shares of
Preferred Series A shares into 280,000 shares of common stock.

During the year ended September 30, 2005 the Company issued 20,000,000 shares of
Preferred Series S shares to the Parent company, U.S. Microbics in settlement of
due to affiliate.

During the year ended September 30, 2005 the Company issued 5,000 shares of
Preferred Series A to an employee upon exercise of stock option and receipt of
$1,250. These shares were valued at $0.25 per share.

During the year ended September 30, 2005 the Company issued 8,000 shares of
Preferred Series A to a consultant upon exercise of stock option. Proceed for
exercise of stock option was settled for exchange for services for $2,000. These
services were valued at $0.25 per share.


Common Stock
------------

The Company is authorized to issue 300,000,000 shares of common stock with a par
value of $.001 per share. As of September 30, 2005 and 2004, the Company has
issued and has outstanding 62,877,460 and 35,860,574 shares of common stock,
respectively. All valuations of common stock issued for services were based the
fair value of the services received which did not differ materially from the
value of the stock issued

Common stock transactions during the year ended September 30, 2004:

During the year ended September 30, 2004 the Company issued 3,367,445 shares of
restricted common stock in exchange for $560,803, net of finance costs of
$21,500.

During year ended September 30, 2004, the stock holders of convertible preferred
stock series A elected to convert 360,000 preferred stock series into 1,800,000
common stocks of the Company.

                                      F-19



<PAGE>

                 SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                           SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004

NOTE G - STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY (continued)

During the year ended September 30, 2004, the Company issued an aggregate of
2,633,178 shares of common stock to consultants exchange for a total of $592,616
for services and expenses rendered. These shares were valued at a weighted
average of $0.26 per share which represents the fair value of the services
received which did not differ materially from the value of the stock issued.

For the year ended September 30, 2004, the Company issued an aggregate of
862,800 shares of common stock to settle notes payable due to related parties
and accrued expenses for a total of $155,500. These shares were valued at a
weighted average of $0.18 per share.

For the year ended September 30, 2004, the Company issued an aggregate of
5,669,700 shares of common stock to settle notes payable and accrued interest
for a total of $873,849. These shares were valued at a weighted average of $0.15
per share.

For the year ended September 30, 2004, the Company issued an aggregate of
441,667 shares of common stock to settle accounts payable outstanding balance
for a total of $133,750. These shares were valued at a weighted average of $0.30
per share.

For the year ended September 30, 2004, the Company issued an aggregate of
545,000 shares of common stock to employees under an employee stock option plan.
Under this plan Employees were able to purchase stock at 85% of market price.
Proceeds from the exercised options were used for general operating expenses.

Net proceeds to the company were $ 123,037. The company incurred expenses of
$21,713.

For the year ended September 30, 2004, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of
common stock in connection with the acquisition of 50% percent interest in four
PureSafe Water Stations for leasing. These shares were valued at $400,000. To be
conservative, the Company has elected to expense this investment due to the
uncertainty of a new venture.

In August 2004, pursuant to the Fusion Capital Note agreements (see note F), the
Company issued a warrant to purchase 250,000 shares of its common stock at a
price of $0.275 per share. The Company valued the warrant using the
Black-Scholes calculation model, and the warrants were deemed to have a value of
$67,500. This amount was recorded as a discount to the Fusion Capital Note and
an addition to paid-in capital, and is being charged to expense over the term of
the note, or 180 days. During the years ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 the
Company recognized $46,125 and $21,375, respectively, of expense in relation to
this warrant.

                                      F-20



<PAGE>

                 SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004

Common stock transactions during the year ended September 30, 2005:

During the year ended September 30, 2005 the Company issued 12,657,623 shares of
restricted common stock in exchange for $610,940, net of finance costs of
$19,375.

For the year ended September 30, 2005, the Company issued an aggregate of
375,000 shares of common stock in settlement of a finders fee for a for a total
of $10,000. These shares were valued at a weighted average of approximately
$0.03 per share.

For the year ended September 30, 2005, the Company issued an aggregate of
4,654,000 shares of common stock to employees under an employee stock option
plan. Under this plan Employees were able to purchase stock at 85% of market
price. Proceeds from the exercised options were used for general operating
expenses.

Net proceeds to the company were $ 447,888. The company incurred expenses of
$79,039.

For the year ended September 30, 2005, the Company issued an aggregate of
246,000 shares of common stock to employees in exchange for a total of $86,100
of services rendered. These shares were valued at a weighted average of $0.35
per share which represents the fair value of the services received which did not
differ materially from the value of the stock issued.

For the year ended September 30, 2005, the Company issued an aggregate of
509,615 shares of common stock to employees in exchange for a total of $40,770
of services rendered. These shares were valued at a weighted average of $0.08
per share which represents the fair value of the services received which did not
differ materially from the value of the stock issued.

For the year ended September 30, 2005, the Company issued an aggregate of
1,090,429 shares of common stock to settle accounts payable outstanding balance
for a total of $161,481. These shares were valued at a weighted average of
approximately $0.15 per share.

During the year ended September 30, 2005, the Company issued an aggregate of
1,371,032 shares of common stock to consultants exchange for a total of $175,025
for services and expenses rendered. These shares were valued at a weighted
average of approximately $0.13 per share which represents the fair value of the
services received which did not differ materially from the value of the stock
issued.

For the year ended September 30, 2005, the Company issued an aggregate of
4,903,498 shares of common stock to settle notes payable and accrued interest
for a total of $279,583. These shares were valued at a weighted average of
approximately $0.06 per share.

For the year ended September 30, 2005, the Company issued an aggregate of
781,700 shares of restricted common stock to an affiliate to satisfy a balance
due to affiliate for a total of $46,900. These shares were valued at a weighted
average of $0.06 per share.

For the year ended September 30, 2005, the Company issued 83,334 shares of
restricted common stock valued at $10,000. The Company reported an increase in
deposits in regards to this transaction.

During the year ended September 30, 2005 the Company received a $100,000 advance
on future stock sales from Fusion Capital. The company issued 64,655 shares of
common stock associated with this advance. The transactions were valued at .232
per share. The remaining balance of the advance is $85,000 as of September 30,
2005.

NOTE H - STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

Employee Stock Options

The following table summarizes the changes in options outstanding and the
related prices for the shares of the Company's Preferred Stock Series A (see
Note G) issued to employees of the Company under a non-qualified employee stock
option plan.

<TABLE>
                          Options Outstanding                        Options Exercisable
                          -------------------                        -------------------
                                                             Weighted                     Weighted
                                         Weighted Average    Average                      Average
          Exercise      Number       Remaining Contractual   Exercise       Number        Exercise
           Prices     Outstanding         Life (Years)        Price       Exercisable       Price
           ------     -----------         ------------        -----       -----------       -----
<S>       <C>           <C>                   <C>             <C>           <C>             <C>
          $ 0.25         81,000               0.93            $ 0.25         79,000         $0.25
          $ 1.38        280,000               4.75            $ 1.38        280,000         $1.38
          ------        -------               ----            ------        -------         -----
Totals                  361,000               3.58            $  .86        359,000         $ .25
                        =======               ====            ======        =======         =====

                                      F-21

</TABLE>


<PAGE>

                 SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004

NOTE H - STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (continued)

Transactions involving stock options issued to employees are summarized as
follows:

                                                                       Weighted
                                                                       Average
                                                        Number of     Price Per
                                                         Shares         Share
                                                        ---------     ---------
Outstanding at October 1, 2003                            390,000     $    0.25
      Granted                                             293,000          1.33
      Exercised                                          (168,000)        (0.25)
      Canceled or expired                                      --            --
                                                        ---------     ---------
Outstanding at September 30, 2004                         515,000           .86
      Granted                                                  --            --
      Exercised                                          (134,000)        (0.25)
      Canceled or expired                                 (20,000)
                                                        ---------     ---------
Outstanding at September 30, 2005                         361,000     $     .86
                                                        =========     ========

The weighted-average fair value of stock options granted to employees during the
year ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 and the weighted-average significant
assumptions used to determine those fair values, using a Black-Scholes option
pricing model are as follows:

                                                              2005         2004
                                                            --------     -------
Significant assumptions (weighted-average):
    Risk-free interest rate at grant date                      --         1.29%

    Expected stock price volatility                            --          135%
    Expected dividend payout                                   --           --
    Expected option life-years (a)                             --         4.50

         (a) The expected option life is based on contractual expiration dates.

If the Company recognized compensation cost for the non-qualified employee stock
option plan in accordance with SFAS No. 123, the Company's pro forma net loss
and net loss per share would have been $1,627,719 and $3,379,575 and $(0.04)
$(0.15) for the year ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

                                      F-22



<PAGE>

                 SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004

NOTE H - STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (continued)

Non-Employee Options

The following table summarizes the changes in options outstanding and the
related prices for the shares of the Company's common stock issued to
non-employees of the Company as of September 30, 2005:

<TABLE>
<S>     <C>
                             Options Outstanding                        Options Exercisable
                             -------------------                        -------------------
                                                                Weighted                      Weighted
                                            Weighted Average    Average                       Average
          Exercise         Number        Remaining Contractual  Exercise       Number         Exercise
           Prices        Outstanding         Life (Years)        Price       Exercisable       Price
           ------        -----------         ------------        -----       -----------       -----
          $ 0.25           20,000                 .58           $ 0.25         20,000         $ 0.25
          $ 0.08        1,000,000                2.81           $ 0.08        500,000         $ 0.08
          $ 0.10          400,000                2.82           $ 0.10             --         $ 0.10
                        1,420,000                2.78           $ 0.08        520,000         $ 0.08
Transactions involving options issued to non-employees are summarized as follows:

                                                                       Weighted
                                                                        Average
                                                        Number of      Price Per
                                                         Shares          Share
                                                        ----------    ----------
Outstanding at October 1, 2003                                  --    $       --
      Granted                                               20,000           .25
      Exercised                                                 --            --
      Canceled or expired                                       --            --
                                                        ----------    ----------
Outstanding at September 30, 2004                           20,000           .25
      Granted                                            1,400,000           .08
      Exercised                                                 --            --
      Canceled or expired                                       --            --
                                                        ----------    ----------
Outstanding at September 30, 2005                        1,420,000    $     0.08
                                                        ==========    ==========

The weighted-average fair value of stock options granted to non-employees during
the year ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 and the weighted-average significant
assumptions used to determine those fair values, using a Black-Scholes option
pricing model are as follows:

                                                              2005         2004
                                                            --------     -------
Significant assumptions (weighted-average):
    Risk-free interest rate at grant date                      3.27%        --

    Expected stock price volatility                          122.70%        --
    Expected dividend payout                                   --           --
    Expected option life-years (a)                             3.00         --

(a) The expected option life is based on contractual expiration dates.

The Company has recognized consulting expense of $120,574 and $0, for the
non-employee stock option issued for the year ended September 30, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.

Non-Employee Warrants

The following table summarizes the changes in warrants outstanding and the
related prices for the shares of the Company's common stock issued to
non-employees of the Company as of September 30, 2005:

                             Warrants Outstanding                        Warrants Exercisable
                             --------------------                        --------------------
                                                                Weighted                      Weighted
                                            Weighted Average    Average                       Average
          Exercise         Number        Remaining Contractual  Exercise       Number         Exercise
           Prices        Outstanding         Life (Years)        Price       Exercisable       Price
           ------        -----------         ------------        -----       -----------       -----
       $ 0.25 - $ 0.50      250,000               3.85           $ 0.28         250,000        $ 0.28
       $ 0.50 - $ 1.00    1,000,000               3.70             0.75       1,000,000          0.75
       $ 1.00 - $ 2.00    1,000,000               3.70             1.75       1,000,000          1.75
       ---------------    ---------               ----           ------       ---------        ------
                          2,250,000               3.72           $ 1.14       2,250,000        $ 1.14
                          =========               ====           ======       =========        ======

                                                    F-23
</TABLE>


<PAGE>

                 SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004

NOTE H - STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (continued)

Transactions involving warrants issued to non-employees are summarized as
follows:

                                                                       Weighted
                                                                        Average
                                                        Number of      Price Per
                                                         Shares          Share
                                                        ----------    ----------
Outstanding at October 1, 2003                                 --            --
      Granted                                           2,250,000          1.14
      Exercised                                                --            --
      Canceled or expired                                      --            --
                                                        ----------    ----------
Outstanding at September 30, 2004                       2,250,000          1.14
      Granted                                                  --            --
      Canceled or expired                                      --            --
                                                        ----------    ----------
      Exercised                                                --            --
Outstanding at September 30, 2005                       2,250,000     $    1.14
                                                        ==========    ==========

During the year ended September 30, 2004, warrants issued to non-employees
resulted in a charge of $ 21,375 to interest expense and $495,000 to deferred
equity issuance costs. These charges were computed using a Black-Scholes
financial model using a volatility of 140.73% using the federal reverse funds
guidelines that range from 1.03 to 1.43%.

                                      F-24

             SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004

NOTE I - LOSSES PER COMMON SHARE

The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted loss per
share:

                                                       2005            2004
                                                   -------------    ------------
Net loss available for common shareholders         $  1,627,719     $ 3,316,635
                                                   =============    ============
Basic and fully diluted loss per share             $      (0.04)    $     (0.15)
                                                   =============    ============
Weighted average common shares outstanding           43,249,462      22,313,409
                                                   =============    ============

For the years ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, 429,643,325 and 25,000,000
potential shares , respectively were excluded from shares used to calculate
diluted earnings per share as their inclusion would reduce net losses per share.

NOTE J - RELATED PARTY NOTES PAYABLE

The Company's officers and entities controlled by the Company's officers have
advanced the Company funds during September 30, 2003 for working capital
purposes. The net amount of advances due the related parties at September 30,
2005 and 2004 was $1,150 and $9,160 respectively (see Note F).

NOTE K - INCOME TAXES

The Company has adopted Financial Accounting Standard No. 109 which requires the
recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax
consequences of events that have been included in the financial statement or tax
returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined
based on the difference between financial statements and tax bases of assets and
liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the
differences are expected to reverse. Temporary differences between taxable
income reported for financial reporting purposes and income tax purposes are
insignificant.

At September 30, 2005, the Company has available for federal income tax purposes
a net operating loss carryforward of approximately $ 6,000,000 expiring in the
year 2025, that may be used to offset future taxable income. The Company has
provided a valuation reserve against the full amount of the net operating loss
benefit, since in the opinion of management based upon the earnings history of
the Company , it is more likely than not that the benefits will not be realized.
Due to significant changes in the Company's ownership, the future use of its
existing net operating losses may be limited.

Components of deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2005 are as follows:

                  Non Current:
                  Net operating loss carryforward                  $  2,290,000
                  Valuation allowance                                (2,290,000)
                                                                   -------------
                  Net deferred tax asset                           $         --
                                                                   =============

NOTE L - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Employment agreements
---------------------

Effective December 23, 2002, the Company entered into an employment agreement
with its President and Chief Executive Officer. This employment agreement
provides for a term of five years, at an initial annual base salary of $150,000,
salary increases of $10,000 per annum for each of the first four years and an
increase of $20,000 for the fifth year, and discretionary incentive bonuses.

Effective December 23, 2002, the Company entered into an employment agreement
with its Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. This employment agreement
provides for a term of five years, at an initial annual base salary of $145,000,
salary increases of $10,000 per annum for each of the first four years and an
increase of $20,000 for the fifth year, and discretionary incentive bonuses.

Litigation
----------

The Company is subject to legal claims and legal proceeding which arise in the
ordinary course of its business. Although occasional adverse decisions or
settlements may occur, the Company believes that the final disposition of such
matters should not have a material adverse effect on its financial position,
results of operations or liquidity.

                                      F-25



<PAGE>

                 SUB SURFACE WASTE MANAGEMENT OF DELAWARE, INC.
                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND 2004

Letters of credit
-----------------

The Company is obligated under various letters of credit in connection with the
issuance of bonds guarantying specific performance under certain remediation
contracts. The letters of credit, which aggregate approximately $217,000 are
secured by Company assets (see Note C) and third party collateral.

Lease Commitments
-----------------

The Company leases office space in Colorado on a month to month basis. A new one
year lease agreement was entered into for the South Carolina office on September
29, 2005. The Company also shares administrative offices with U.S. Microbics,
Inc. in Carlsbad, California.

Rental expense for the year ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 charged to
operations was $31,384 and $27,490, respectively.

NOTE M - SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company has one reportable business segment which is operated through
geographic locations.

Those geographic segments are:

* United States
* Mexico

Segment operating income is total segment revenue reduced by operating expenses
identifiable with the business segment. Corporate includes general corporate
administrative costs.

The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based upon operating
income. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those
described in the summary of accounting policies. There are no inter-segment
sales.

Information concerning principal geographic areas is presented below according
to the area where the activity is taking place.

                                                      2005              2004
                                                   ----------        ----------
         NET SALES TO EXTERNAL CUSTOMERS:
         United States                             $  123,356        $  234,018
         Mexico                                       971,419                --
           TOTAL SALES TO EXTERNAL CUSTOMERS       $1,094,775        $  234,018
                                                   ==========        ==========

         ASSETS:
         United States                              1,272,663        $  816,552
         Mexico                                        44,100                --
            TOTAL ASSETS                           $1,316,763        $  816,552
                                                   ==========        ==========

NOTE N - ECONOMIC DEPENDENCY

Company has one major customer. For the year ended September 30, 2005, sales to
this customer amounts to $971,419, and consists of 89% of total sales.

Company has one major supplier. For the year ended September 30, 2005, purchases
from this vendor totaled 54% of total purchases.

NOTE O - GOING CONCERN

The accompanying consolidated statements have been prepared on a going concern
basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of
liabilities in the normal course of business. As shown in the financial
statements during the years ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, the Company
incurred losses from operations of $1,488,537 and $3,149,035, respectively. This
factor among others may indicate that the Company will be unable to continue as
a going concern for a reasonable period of time.

The Company's existence is dependent upon management's ability to develop
profitable operations and resolve its liquidity problems. Management anticipates
the Company will attain profitable status and improve its liquidity through the
continued developing, marketing and selling of its products and additional
equity investment in the Company. The accompanying financial statements do not
include any adjustments that might result should the Company be unable to
continue as a going concern.

In order to improve the Company's liquidity, the Company is actively pursing
additional equity financing through discussions with investment bankers and
private investors. There can be no assurance the Company will be successful in
its effort to secure additional equity financing.

If operations and cash flows continue to improve through these efforts,
management believes that the Company can continue to operate. However, no
assurance can be given that management's actions will result in profitable
operations or the resolution of its liquidity problems.

                                      F-26



<PAGE>

                                       III
                                       ---

ITEM 8.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
         FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

None.

ITEM 8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

         (a) EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. Regulations under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 require public companies to maintain
"disclosure controls and procedures," which are defined to mean a company's
controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in the reports that it files or submits under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported,
within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms. Our Chief
Executive Officer ("CEO"), who is also our President, and our Chief Financial
Officer ("CFO") carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Based on those evaluations, as of the Evaluation Date, our CEO/President and CFO
believe:

                  (i) that our disclosure controls and procedures are designed
         to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the
         reports we file under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded,
         processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in
         the SEC's rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and
         communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, as
         appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure;
         and

                  (ii) that our disclosure controls and procedures are
         effective.

         (b) CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS. There were no  changes in
our internal controls or, to our knowledge, in other factors that could
significantly affect our internal controls subsequent to the evaluation date.

                                       28



<PAGE>

ITEM 9.  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS;
         COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

IDENTITY

The following table identifies our current executive officers and directors and
their respective offices held:

<TABLE>
<S>     <C>
NAME                    AGE       POSITION
----                    ---       --------

Bruce Beattie           51        President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board

Behzad Mirzayi          50        Chief Operating Officer, Vice President, and Director

Conrad Nagel            64        Chief Financial Officer and Director

Robert C. Brehm         57        Director and President and CEO of parent U.S. Microbics, Inc.

Bill Hopkins            71        Director

</TABLE>

BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

The Company's Bylaws provide for a minimum of three directors and a maximum of
11. Each director of the Company holds office until the next annual meeting of
shareholders and until his or her successor has been elected and qualified. Each
executive officer holds office at the pleasure of the Board of Directors and
until his or her successor has been elected and qualified. A brief background of
each Director and Executive Officer is provided below:

BRUCE BEATTIE became President, CEO and Director of the Company on December 16,
2002. Mr. Beattie has over 23 years experience in the environmental service
industry with expertise in business development, operations and project
management. His career spans the introduction of breakthrough treatment
technology for the sub surface remediation of chlorinated solvents, executive
level profit center turn-around management and was a pioneer in the development
of "Brownfield" redevelopment solutions for two nationally recognized
environmental firms. Previously, Mr. Beattie was President of Sub Surface Waste
Management, Inc. a subsidiary of U.S. Microbics, Inc since August 15, 2000.
Prior to that date he was Group Vice President for Environmental Reclamation,
Inc. since September 2, 1998.

BEHZAD MIRZAYI, P.E. has served as COO, Executive Vice President, Chief Engineer
and Director for the Company since December 16, 2002. Mr. Mirzayi has over 25
years experience in diversified areas of engineering, construction, and
management. He has extensive experience managing office and field staffs and
professionals involved in multi-discipline design and construction projects and
management of profit and loss centers. He has a diverse background in all types
of management, civil, environmental, geotechnical and structural engineering,
construction management, technical supervision analysis and design, and
construction oversight, cost and time management, risk evaluation, cost
estimation and client and regulatory interface for mining, industrial, oil and
gas facilities. Previously, Mr. Mirzayi was Vice President and COO of Sub
Surface Waste Management, Inc. a subsidiary of U.S. Microbics, Inc since
September 25, 2000. Prior to that date he was Chief Operating Officer for
Environmental Reclamation, Inc. since September 2, 1998.

CONRAD NAGEL has served as the Company's Chief Financial Officer and Director
since December 16, 2002. Mr. Nagel is also the CFO of parent company U.S.
Microbics, Inc., and has held that position for the past five years. Mr. Nagel
has an MS degree in Accounting, Kansas University (1964), a BS degree in
Business, University of Kansas (1963) and a CPA since 1966. Mr. Nagel has been
associated with SEC work, auditing, and finance operations for the past 30 years
including Audit Manager for Touche Ross (now Deloitte - Touche), Vice President
of Finance - Decision Incorporated, Internal Audit Manager for Kaiser Aetna, CFO
for Calusa Financial Medical, Inc., Vice President of Finance for Medical
Capital Corporation and over fifteen years CPA practice specializing in taxation
and SEC work.

ROBERT C. BREHM has served as Secretary of the Company since December 16, 2002
and a Director since October 24, 2002. Mr. Brehm is also the parent company's
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board since July 1997.
>From July 1994 through the present, Mr. Brehm has served as the President of
Robert C. Brehm Consulting, Inc. From 1991 to 1994, he was the President of
Specialty Financing International, Inc., a finance procurement company. Mr.
Brehm has owned computer hardware, software, finance and consulting companies.
Mr. Brehm has a double engineering degree in electrical engineering and computer
science and an MBA in Finance and Accounting from UC Berkeley.

                                       29



<PAGE>

BILL HOPKINS has served as a Director of the Company since May 2003. Mr. Hopkins
is the owner and founder of Fastening Solutions, Inc., which manufactures
specialty fasteners for the government, marine and recreational vehicles markets
with worldwide distribution. Mr. Hopkins has served for 12 years as Regional
Sales Manager for the Business Group Sales for Digital Equipment Corporation and
for 10 years as Executive Sales Manager, Business Group sales, Burrows
Corporation. He received his BA in Business administration from the Babson
Institute in Boston MA.

Audit Committee
---------------

We do not currently have a separately designated Audit Committee. Our entire
Board of Directors functions as the Company's Audit Committee. No individual on
our Board of Directors possesses all of the attributes of an audit committee
financial expert and no one on our Board of Directors is deemed to be an audit
committee financial expert. In forming our Board of Directors, we sought out
individuals who would be able to guide our operations based on their business
experience, both past and present, or their education. Our business model is not
complex and our accounting issues are straightforward. Responsibility for our
operations is centralized within management, which is comprised of four people.
We rely on the assistance of others, such as our accountant, to help us with the
preparation of our financial information. We recognize that having a person who
possesses all of the attributes of an audit committee financial expert would be
a valuable addition to our Board of Directors, however, we are not, at this
time, able to compensate such a person therefore, we may find it difficult to
attract such a candidate.

Directorships
-------------

         The following Directors of the Company are Directors in its parent
company U.S. Microbics, Inc., Conrad Nagel and Robert C. Brehm. The following
Directors of the Company are also shareholders in its parent Company: Bruce
Beattie, Behzad Mirzayi, Conrad Nagel and Robert C. Brehm.

Significant Employees
---------------------

         The Company has employees who are both engineers, geologists,
technicians, consultants and executive officers, all employees and consultants
are expected to make a significant contribution to the Company's business. It is
expected that current employees, consultants, members of management and the
Board of Directors will be the only persons whose activities will be material to
the Company's operations. Members of management are the only persons who may be
deemed to be promoters of the Company.

Family Relationships
--------------------

         There are no family relationships between any two or more of our
directors or executive officers. There is no arrangement or understanding
between any of our directors or executive officers and any other person pursuant
to which any director or officer was or is to be selected as a director or
officer, and there is no arrangement, plan or understanding as to whether
non-management shareholders will exercise their voting rights to continue to
elect the current board of directors. There are also no arrangements, agreements
or understandings to our knowledge between non-management shareholders that may
directly or indirectly participate in or influence the management of our
affairs.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
----------------------------------------

         To the best of our knowledge, during the past five years, none of the
following occurred with respect to a present or former director or executive
officer of the company: (1) any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any
business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either
at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; (2) any
conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal
proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); (3) being
subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended
or vacated, of any court of any competent jurisdiction, permanently or
temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement
in any type of business, securities or banking activities; and (4) being found
by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the
commodities futures trading commission to have violated a federal or state
securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended
or vacated.There are no family relationships between any directors or executive
officers of the Company, either by blood or by marriage.

                                       30



<PAGE>

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
-------------------------------------------------

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company's
executive officers, directors and persons who own more than ten percent of the
Company's Common Stock, to file initial reports of beneficial ownership on Form
3, changes in beneficial ownership on Form 4 and an annual statement of
beneficial ownership on Form 5, with the SEC. Such executive officers, directors
and greater than ten percent shareholders are required by SEC rules to furnish
the Company with copies of all such forms that they have filed. To the Company's
knowledge, based solely on review of the copies of such reports furnished to the
Company and written representation that no other reports were required, the
Company's officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders complied with
all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements.

Code of Ethics
--------------

We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics (Exhibit 10.12) that
applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer,
principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar
functions..

                                       31



<PAGE>

ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

         The following table sets forth the aggregate compensation paid by the
Company for services rendered during the last three completed fiscal years :

<TABLE>
<S>     <C>
                                               SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
                                                 LONG-TERM COMPENSATION

                                        ANNUAL COMPENSATION                                           AWARDS
                                        -------------------                                           ------
                                                                        SECURITIES
NAME AND PRINCIPAL                                 RESTRICTED STOCK     UNDERLYING        OTHER ANNUAL      ALL OTHER
POSITION              FISCAL YEAR   SALARY ($)        AWARDS ($)     OPTIONS/SARS (#)     COMPENSATION    COMPENSATION
--------              -----------   ----------        ----------     ----------------     ------------    ------------
Bruce Beattie,           2005         196,445
President, Director      2004         178,843            ----              ----               ----            ----
                         2003         143,643            ----              ----               ----            ----


Behzad Mirzayi,          2005         191,449
COO, Director            2004         178,793            ----              ----               ----            ----
                         2003         143,300            ----              ----               ----            ----

                         2005           ----
Conrad Nagel             2004           ----
CFO, Director            2003           ----            ----              ----               ----            ----


STOCK OPTION GRANTS
-------------------

The grants of stock options to the Named Executive Officers during the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:

                                                                                           ESTIMATED
                                                                                             OPTION
                                                                                            VALUE AT
                            DATE        DATE       EXPIRATION      OPTIONS      GRANT         DATE
                           GRANTED     VESTED        DATE        GRANTED (1)    PRICE      GRANTED (2)
                           -------     ------        ----        -----------    -----      -----------
   Bruce S. Beattie       08-10-04    06-30-05      06-30-10       50,000       $1.375     $     1.25
   Behzad Mirzayi         08-10-04    06-30-05      06-30-10       50,000       $1.375     $     1.25
   Conrad Nagel           08-10-04    06-30-05      06-30-10       80,000       $1.375     $     1.25

</TABLE>

(1) Options Granted were for Series A Preferred stock which one year after issue
can be converted into 5 shares of common stock for each share of Preferred stock
held.

(2) Option value based on closing price of one share of common stock on August
10, 2004 multiplied by 5, the conversion ratio of one share of Series A
Preferred Stock into common stock.

                                       32



<PAGE>

OPTION EXERCISES IN FISCAL YEAR 2005
------------------------------------

Set forth below is information with respect to exercises of stock options by the
Named Executive Officers during fiscal year 2005 and the fiscal year-end value
of all unexercised stock options held by such persons.

<TABLE>
                         AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES

                                                                   NUMBER OF UNEXERCISED            VALUE OF UNEXERCISED,
                                                                  OPTIONS HELD AT FISCAL           IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS AT
                                                                     YEAR-END 09/30/05               FISCAL YEAR-END ($)
                                                                     -----------------               -------------------
                                         SHARES
                                       ACQUIRED ON       VALUE
                                         EXERCISE     REALIZED ($)                                        (1)            (1)
        NAME                               (#)            (1)       EXERCISABLE     UN-EXERCISABLE    EXERCISABLE   UN-EXERCISABLE
------------------------------------  --------------  ------------  ------------    --------------    -----------   --------------
<S>                                       <C>         <C>               <C>              <C>          <C>           <C>
BRUCE S. BEATTIE, Director,
President and CEO:
   Preferred Series A Stock (1)           14,000     $  5,600           50,000              ---           $ 0.06          $   ---

BEHZAD MIRZAYI Director,
Vice-President and COO:
   Preferred Series A Stock (1)           70,000      $ 8,000           50,000              ---           $ 0.00          $   ---

CONRAD NAGEL, CFO and Director:
   Preferred Series A Stock (1)            8,000      $ 3,200           80,000              ---           $ 0.00          $   ---

ROBERT C. BREHM, Director and
CEO of parent, U.S. Microbics, Inc.:
   Preferred Series A Stock (1)           20,000      $ 8,000          100,000              ---           $ 0.00          $   ---

MERY C. ROBINSON, COO of
Affiliate U.S. Microbics, Inc.:
   Preferred Series A Stock (1)            none         none            40,000              ---           $ 16,000        $   ---

(1)      Based on the closing price of $0.13 for the shares of Common Stock of the Company traded on the OTC Bulletin Board as of
         September 30, 2005.

</TABLE>

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
-------------------------

         There are no standard arrangements pursuant to which the Company's
directors are compensated for any services provided as director. No additional
amounts are payable to the Company's directors for committee participation or
special assignments.

         There are no arrangements pursuant to which any of the Company's
directors was compensated during the Company's last completed fiscal year for
any service provided as director.

EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS AND TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE-IN-CONTROL
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARRANGEMENTS
------------

         Effective December 23, 2002 the Company entered into an employment
agreement with Bruce S. Beattie, its President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr.
Beattie's employment agreement provides for a term of five years, at an initial
annual base salary of $150,000, salary increases of $10,000 per annum for each
of the first four years and an increase of $20,000 for the fifth year, and
discretionary incentive bonuses.

         Effective December 23, 2002 the Company entered into an employment
agreement with Behzad Mirzayi its Vice President and Chief Operating Officer.
Mr. Mirzayi's employment agreement provides for a term of five years, at an
initial annual base salary of $145,000, salary increases of $10,000 per annum
for each of the first four years and an increase of $20,000 for the fifth year,
and discretionary incentive bonuses

                                       33



<PAGE>

BONUSES AND DEFERRED COMPENSATION
---------------------------------

         None.

COMPENSATION PURSUANT TO PLANS
------------------------------

         None.

PENSION TABLE
-------------

         None; not applicable.

OTHER COMPENSATION
------------------

         None.

TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE OF CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS
------------------------------------------------------------

         On October 21, 2002, Gregory J. Chachas, the sole officer and director
of the Corporation entered into an agreement to sell 2,100,000 of the 2,573,800
shares he owned to USM Capital Group, Inc. In continued efforts to locate an
acquisition or merger candidate, the Company also entered into a consulting
agreement with Sol Tech Corporation whereby the Company issued 800,000 shares of
restricted common stock at the price of $0.05 per share. The result was that Sub
Surface Waste Management of Delaware, Inc., became a 56.3% owned subsidiary of
U.S. Microbics, Inc., the parent Company of both USM Capital Group, Inc. and Sol
Tech Corporation.

         We are not aware of any arrangements which may result in a change in
control of the company.

                                       34



<PAGE>

ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

     The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial
ownership of the common stock as of December 31, 2005 by (i) each person who is
known by the company to own beneficially more than 5% of the any classes of
outstanding Stock, (ii) each director of the company, (iii) each of the Chief
Executive Officers and the four (4) most highly compensated executive officers
who earned in excess of $100,000 for all services in all capacities
(collectively, the "Named Executive Officers") and (iv) all directors and
executive officers of the company as a group.

     The number and percentage of shares beneficially owned is determined in
accordance with Rule 13d-3 and 13d-5 of the Exchange Act, and the information is
not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. We
believe that each individual or entity named has sole investment and voting
power with respect to the securities indicated as beneficially owned by them,
subject to community property laws, where applicable, except where otherwise
noted. Unless otherwise stated, the address of each person is 6451-C, El Camino
Real, Carlsbad, CA 92009.

<TABLE>
                                                                                                 CLASS OF STOCK
                                                                           --------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                    COMMON STOCK OF          COMMON STOCK OF U.S.
                                                                                        COMPANY            MICROBICS, INC. (PARENT)
                                                                           --------------------------------------------------------

                                 NAME                                                 AMOUNT        %         AMOUNT          %
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                             <C>               <C>       <C>             <C>
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS:
- -----------------------

Bruce S. Beattie President, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD     1,100,000 (1)    1.56       1,422,729       .50

Behzad Mirzayi, CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER, VICE-PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR              1,325,000 (2)    1.87       1,064,237       .38

Conrad Nagel, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND DIRECTOR                                1,610,572 (3)    2.27       3,894,190      1.37

Robert C. Brehm, DIRECTOR, SECRETARY AND CEO OF AFFILIATE U.S. MICROBICS, INC.    3,905,408 (4)    5.36      22,072,082      7.73

Bill Hopkins, DIRECTOR                                                               35,000 (5)    0.05           None        N/A

All Officers and Directors as a group (5 persons)                                 7,975,980        11.4      28,453,238      10.1
AFFILIATES AND OTHER 5% SHAREHOLDERS OF ANY CLASS OF STOCK:
- -----------------------------------------------------------

Mery C. Robinson, DIRECTOR OF AFFILIATE U.S. MICROBICS, INC.                        200,000 (6)    0.29       7,553,297       2.65

U.S. Microbics, Inc. (Parent)                                                   432,805,550 (7)   87.24            N/A        N/A

Mark Holmstedt, DIRECTOR OF U.S. MICROBICS, INC.                                    865,615 (8)    1.24      1,649,950        .58

Darwin Ting and Kuei Mei Ting TRS FBO Ting Family Trust UA 03-04-02               6,092,967 (9)    8.73      6,000,000       2.12



John D. Garber                                                                   13,925,000(11)   19.95      1,250,003        .44

Michael Jordan                                                                    5,390,833(12)    7.70      7,141,667       3.16

Thomas Westhoff                                                                   1,654,350 13)    2.35      1,900,000        .85
</TABLE>

- ----------

(1)  Includes 14,000 shares of Series A Preferred stock convertible into 70,000
     shares of common stock and stock options to purchase 250,000 shares of
     common stock exercisable within 90 days of September 12, 2005.
(2)  Includes 70,000 shares Series A Preferred stock convertible into 350,000
     shares of common stock and stock options to purchase 250,000 shares of
     common stock exercisable within 90 days of September 12, 2005.
(3)  Includes 40,000 shares of Series A Preferred stock convertible into 200,000
     shares of common stock and stock options to purchase 400,000 shares of
     common stock exercisable within 90 days of September 12, 2005.
(4)  Includes 100,000 shares of Series A Preferred stock convertible into
     500,000 shares of common stock: 154,833 shares owned by ACSI Profit Sharing
     Trust, owned By Mr. Brehm and options to purchase 500,000 shares of common
     stock exercisable within 90 days of September 12, 2005.
(5)  Includes 5,000 shares of Series A Preferred stock convertible into 25,000
     shares of common stock.
(6)  Includes Series A Preferred stock options convertible into 200,000 shares
     of common stock exercisable within 90 days of September 12, 2005.
(7)  Includes 800,000 shares of common stock owned by Sol Tech Corporation,
     which is controlled by U.S. Microbics, Inc.; 4,600,000 shares of common
     stock owned by USM Capital Group, Inc, which is controlled by U.S.
     Microbics, Inc.; 781,700 shares of common stock owned by West coast
     Fermentation Center; Series A Preferred shares convertible into 26,305,550
     shares of common stock; Series A Preferred shares convertible into
     1,527,775 of common stock. These shares are owned by USM Capital Group,
     Inc..; Series S Preferred shares which have 400,000,000 voting rights on a
     share -for-share basis with common stock. . U.S Microbics, Inc., our parent
     company, exercises voting and investment power over the shares held by USM
     Capital Group, Inc, Sol Tech Corporation and West Coast Fermentation
     Center.
(8)  Includes 20,000 common stock options.
(9)  Address: 154 Via Copia, Alamo, CA 94507. Address: 2142 Liane Lane, Santa
     Ana, CA 92705
(10) 10 Steven G. Martin and Joshua B. Scheinfeld, the principals of Fusion
     Capital, are deemed to be beneficial owners of all of the shares of common
     stock owned by Fusion Capital. Messrs. Martin and Scheinfeld have shared
     voting and investment power over the shares being offered under this
     prospectus. Address: 222 Merchandise Mart Plaza, Suite 9-112, Chicago, IL
     60654.
(10) Includes 1,050,000 shares of our common stock and up to 2,250,000 shares of
     common stock underlying warrants acquired by Fusion Capital and up to
     1,500,000 shares underlying a convertible promissory note held by Fusion
     Capital. Fusion Capital may not exercise the warrant or convert the note to
     the extent such exercise or conversion would cause the aggregate number of
     shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Fusion Capital to exceed 9.9%
     of the outstanding shares of the Common Stock following such exercise or
     conversion. Fusion Capital may acquire up to an additional $6,000,000 in
     common shares under the common stock purchase agreement. Fusion Capital may
     not purchase shares of our common stock under the common stock purchase
     agreement if Fusion Capital, together with its affiliates, would
     beneficially own more than 9.9% of our common stock outstanding at the time
     of the purchase by Fusion Capital. However, even though Fusion Capital may
     not receive additional shares of our common stock in the event that the
     9.9% limitation is ever reached, Fusion Capital is still obligated to pay
     to us $12,500 on each trading day, unless the common stock purchase
     agreement is suspended, an event of default occurs or the agreement is
     terminated. Under these circumstances, Fusion Capital would have the right
     to acquire additional shares in the future should its ownership
     subsequently become less than the 9.9%. Fusion Capital has the right at any
     time to sell any shares purchased under the common stock purchase agreement
     which would allow it to avoid the 9.9% limitation. Therefore, we do not
     believe that Fusion Capital will ever reach the 9.9% limitation.
(11) Includes 5,750,000 common shares owned by the Garber Family Trust UTD July
     30, 1992. The Trust is co-owned by John D. Garber and his spouse Claire
     Garber. Address: 78166 Bovee Circle, Palm Desert, CA 92211
(12) Includes Series B Preferred stock convertible into 250,000 shares
     of common stock.
(13) Includes Series B Preferred stock convertible into ,000 shares
     of common stock.

---------------------

                                       36



<PAGE>

ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
        U.S. Microbics, Inc., is our parent company. U.S. Microbics, Inc.
directly owns 432,805,550 shares of our common stock, including 400,000,000
shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series S Preferred stock,
also including 26,305,550 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of
Series A Preferred stock. U.S. Microbics, Inc. also owns 80% of USM Capital
Group, Inc., which owns 6,127,775 shares of common stock, including 1,527,775
shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A Preferred stock.
U.S. Microbics, Inc. also owns 100% of SolTech, Inc., which owns 800,000 shares
of common stock. U.S. Microbics, Inc. also owns 100% of West Coast Fermentation
Center, Inc., which owns 781,700 shares of common stock.

         There have been no other material transactions, series of similar
transactions, currently proposed transactions, or series of similar
transactions, to which we or any of our subsidiaries was or is to be a party, in
which the amount involved exceeded $60,000 and in which any director or
executive officer, or any stockholder who is known to us to own of record or
beneficially more than five percent of our common stock, or any member of the
immediate family of any of the foregoing persons, had a material interest.

                                                         37



<PAGE>

ITEM 13. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

3.1      Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. (1)

3.2      Bylaws. (2)

10.1     Capital Stock Exchange and Agreement between the Registrant and the
         Series A Preferred Stock stockholders and option holders of Sub surface
         Waste Management, Inc., a Nevada Corporation.(1)

10.2     Consulting Agreement with Sol Tech Inc., dated as of October 21, 2002.
         (4)

10.3     Common Stock Purchase Agreement between Registrant and Fusion Capital
         Fund II, LLC, dated as of June 10, 2004.(3)

10.4     Amendment dated as August 4, 2004, to the Common Stock Purchase
         Agreement between Registrant and Fusion Capital Fund II, LLC. (4)

10.5     Amended Registration Rights Agreement between Registrant and Fusion
         Capital Fund II, LLC, dated as of August 4, 2004. (4)

10.6     Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Fusion Capital Fund II,
         LLC, in connection with Common Stock Purchase Agreement with Fusion
         Capital Fund II, LLC. (3)

10.7     Bridge Loan Agreement between Registrant and Fusion Capital Fund II,
         LLC, dated as of August 4, 2004. (4)

10.8     Promissory Note dated as of August 4, 2004, issued to Fusion Capital
         Fund II, LLC, in connection with Loan Agreement. (4)

10.9     Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to Fusion Capital Fund II,
         LLC, in connection with Loan Agreement with Fusion Capital Fund II,
         LLC. (4)

10.10    Employment agreement with Bruce S. Beattie, dated as of December 23,
         2002.(5)

10.11    Employment agreement with Behzad Mirzayi, dated as of December 23,
         2002. (5)

14.1     Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. (6)

23.1     Consent of Independent Auditor.

31.1     Certification of Chief Executive Officer/President Pursuant to Rule
         13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a).

31.2     Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and
         15d-14(a).

32.1     Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
         to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2     Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
         to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

------------------
(1)      Previously filed as an exhibit to our report on form 8-K filed with the
         SEC on December 30, 2002, and incorporated herein by this reference.
(2)      Previously filed as an exhibit to our report on form 8-K filed with the
         SEC on May 4, 2001, and incorporated herein by this reference.
(3)      Previously filed as an exhibit to our report on form 8-K filed with the
         SEC on June 15, 2004, and incorporated herein by this reference.
(4)      Previously filed as an exhibit to our registration statement on form
         SB-2 filed with the SEC on August 6, 2004, and incorporated herein by
         this reference.
(5)      Previously filed as an exhibit to our amendment no.1 to the
         registration statement on form SB-2 filed with the SEC on September 30,
         2004, and incorporated herein by this reference.
(6)      Previously filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on form 10-KSB
         filed with the SEC on January 18, 2005, and incorporated herein by this
         reference.

                                       38



<PAGE>

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

         The following table sets forth fees billed to us by our auditors during
the fiscal years ended September 30, 2005 and September 30, 2004 for: (i)
services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and the
review of our quarterly financial statements, (ii) services by our auditor that
are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our
financial statements and that are not reported as Audit Fees, (iii) services
rendered in connection with tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning, and
(iv) all other fees for services rendered.

                                       September 30, 2005     September 30, 2004
                                       ------------------     ------------------
(i)        Audit Fees                  $          60,000      $         115,175
(ii)       Audit Related Fees                     23,000                 41,875
(iii)      Tax Fees                               10,000                     --
(iv)       All Other Fees                             --                     --
                                       ------------------     ------------------
       Total fees                      $          93,000      $         157,050
                                       ==================     ==================

         AUDIT FEES. Consists of fees billed for professional services rendered
for the audit of Sub Surface Waste Management of Delaware, Inc.'s consolidated
financial statements and review of the interim consolidated financial statements
included in quarterly reports and services that are normally provided by Russell
Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP in connection with statutory and regulatory
filings or engagements.

         AUDIT-RELATED FEES. Consists of fees billed for assurance and related
services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review
of Sub Surface Waste Management of Delaware, Inc.'s consolidated financial
statements and are not reported under "Audit Fees." There were no Audit-Related
services provided in fiscal 2003 or 2002.

         TAX FEES. Consists of fees billed for professional services for tax
compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

         ALL OTHER FEES. Consists of fees for products and services other than
the services reported above. There were no management consulting services
provided in fiscal 2004 or 2003.

POLICY ON AUDIT COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL OF AUDIT AND PERMISSIBLE NON-AUDIT
SERVICES OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         The Company currently does not have a designated Audit Committee, and
accordingly, the Company's Board of Directors' policy is to pre-approve all
audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent auditors.
These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services
and other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and
any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of
services and is generally subject to a specific budget. The independent auditors
and management are required to periodically report to the Company's Board of
Directors regarding the extent of services provided by the independent auditors
in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to
date. The Board of Directors may also pre-approve particular services on a
case-by-case basis.

                                       39



<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the Undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                   Sub Surface Waste Management of Delaware Inc.
                                   (a Delaware Corporation)

Dated: March 19, 2007              /S/ Bruce S. Beattie
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   By: Bruce S, Beattie
                                   Its: President and Chief Executive Officer
                                   (principal executive officer)

Dated: March 19, 2007              /S/ Conrad Nagel
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   By: Conrad Nagel
                                   Its: Chief Financial Officer
                                   (principal financial and accounting officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

<TABLE>
<S>     <C>
          Name                         Position                                   Date
          ----                         --------                                   ----

/S/ Bruce S. Beattie         Chief Executive Officer and Director             March 19, 2007
--------------------
Bruce S. Beattie

/S/ Behzad Mirzayi           Chief Operating Officer and Director             March 19, 2007
--------------------
Behzad Mirzayi

/S/ Conrad Nagel             Chief Financial Officer and Director             March 19, 2007
--------------------
Conrad Nagel

/S/ Robert C. Brehm          Director                                         March 19, 2007
--------------------
Robert C. Brehm

/S/ Bill Hopkins             Director                                         March 19, 2007
--------------------
Bill Hopkins

                                              40
</TABLE>