alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 606.4 What are low educational and general expenditures? ( a ) ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, for the purpose of § 606.2(a)(2), an applicant institution's average educational and general expenditures per full-time equivalent undergraduate student in the base year must be less than the average educational and general expenditures per full-time equivalent undergraduate student in that year of comparable institutions that offer similar instruction.
( 2 ) For the purpose of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the Secretary determines the average educational and general expenditure per full-time equivalent undergraduate student for institutions with graduate students that do not differentiate between graduate and undergraduate educational and general expenditures by discounting the graduate enrollment using a factor of 2.5 times the number of graduate students.
( b ) Each year, the Secretary notifies prospective applicants through a notice in the Federal Register of the average educational and general expenditures per full-time equivalent undergraduate student at comparable institutions that offer similar instruction.
( c ) The Secretary may waive the requirement contained in paragraph (a) of this section, if the Secretary determines, based upon persuasive evidence provided by the institution, that— ( 1 ) The institution's failure to satisfy the criteria in paragraph (a) of this section was due to factors which, if used in determining compliance with those criteria, distorted that determination; and
( 2 ) The institution's designation as an eligible institution under this part is otherwise consistent with the purposes of this part.
( d ) For the purpose of paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the Secretary considers that the following factors may distort an institution's educational and general expenditures per full-time equivalent undergraduate student— ( 1 ) Low student enrollment;
( 2 ) Location of the institution in an unusually high cost-of-living area;
( 3 ) High energy costs;
( 4 ) An increase in State funding that was part of a desegregation plan for higher education; or
( 5 ) Operation of high cost professional schools such as medical or dental schools.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1101a and 1103a)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      30,779,486
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               27,655,975
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,972,965
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            63,983,411
<PP&E>                                       3,104,090
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,235,567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             207,762,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       53,840,846
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          4
<COMMON>                                        63,466
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               207,762,804
<SALES>                                     42,382,795
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            43,524,374
<CGS>                                       37,711,338
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               37,711,338
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,858,790
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,921,629)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,921,629)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,156,687)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)


</TABLE>
### [§3486A. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–544, §5(b)(3), Dec. 19, 2000, 114 Stat. 2718]

Section, added Pub. L. 105–314, title VI, §606(a)(2), Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 2984, related to administrative subpoenas in cases involving child abuse and child sexual exploitation.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7232]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7327]


Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy; Notice of 
Committee Renewal

    Renewal of an Advisory Committee. The Department of State has 
renewed the Charter of the Advisory Committee on International Economic 
Policy. The Committee serves in a solely advisory capacity concerning 
major issues and problems in international economic policy. The 
Committee provides information and advice on the effective integration 
of economic interests into overall foreign policy and on the Department 
of State's role in advancing American economic and commercial interests 
in a competitive global economy. The Committee also appraises the role 
and limits of international economic institutions and advises on the 
formulation of U.S. economic policy and positions.
    This Committee includes representatives of American organizations 
and institutions having an interest in international economic policy, 
including representatives of American business, state and local 
government, labor unions, public interest groups, and trade and 
professional associations. The Committee meets at least annually to 
advise the Department on the full range of international economic 
policies and issues.
    For further information, please call Tiffany Enoch, Deputy Outreach 
Coordinator, Office of Economic Policy Analysis and Public Diplomacy, 
Bureau of Economic, Energy and Business Affairs, U.S. Department of 
State, at (202) 647-2231.

    Dated: March 1, 2011.
Maryruth Coleman,
Director, Office of Economic Policy Analysis and Public Diplomacy, 
Bureau of Economic, Energy and Business Affairs, U.S. Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2011-7232 Filed 3-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 0

 0

 0

 524

 538

 553

 560

 571

 590

 574

 570

 560

 562

 568

 561

 563

 553

 565

 558

 568

 575

 554

 536

 530

 558

 558

 563

 557

 544

 528

 0

 0

 0

 506

 489

 506

 529

 547

 551

 540

 528

 528

 514

 528

 491

 524

 509

 511

 518

 508

 527

 530

 511

 512

 513

 515

 517

 536

 505

 469

 0

 0

 0

 519

 519

 527

 543

 557

 568

 554

 550

 545

 542

 542

 545

 544

 525

 535

 539

 525

 547

 539

 523

 521

 532

 536

 543

 546

 524

 485

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 18, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 0

 0

 0

 337

 337

 342

 352

 360

 367

 358

 356

 353

 351

 351

 353

 352

 340

 347

 349

 340

 354

 349

 339

 338

 345

 347

 352

 353

 340

 316

TOTAL 14,475

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
§ 371.42 How are services to be administered under this program? ( a ) *Directly or by contract.* A grantee under this part may provide the vocational rehabilitation services directly or it may contract or otherwise enter into an agreement with a DSU, a community rehabilitation program, or another agency to assist in the implementation of the tribal vocational rehabilitation program.
( b ) *Inter-tribal agreement.* A grantee under this part may enter into an inter-tribal arrangement with governing bodies of other Indian tribes for carrying out a project that serves more than one Indian tribe.
( c ) *Comparable services.* To the maximum extent feasible, services provided by a grantee under this part must be comparable to vocational rehabilitation services provided under the State vocational rehabilitation program to other individuals with disabilities residing in the State.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 121(b)(1)(B) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 741(b)(1)(B))
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-0152 SNPRM

Directorate ID: 2010-NM-079-AD

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:

If NO, we don’t agree because 
Page 2 of 3

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Date

Branch Manager Date
Red MENDOZA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. BORDEN, INC., d.b.a. Borden's Dairy, Defendant-Appellee. No. 97-5121. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. March 19, 1999 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Fl orida (No. 96-1082-CV-LCN), Lenore C. Nesbitt, Judge. ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion October 28, 1998, 11th Cir., 158 F.3d 1171). Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in ac tive service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be rehear d by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 850

 735

 837

 867

 876

 903

 889

 883

 871

 831

 814

 862

 917

 956

 933

 872

 859

 902

 909

 888

 974

 982

 926

 951

 923

 874

 936

 942

 926

 920

 921

 715

 655

 676

 747

 721

 736

 777

 771

 790

 759

 781

 808

 832

 810

 810

 826

 772

 806

 845

 836

 819

 909

 917

 926

 866

 862

 875

 916

 903

 899

 880

 805

 692

 723

 811

 798

 804

 841

 819

 824

 793

 798

 844

 875

 882

 861

 850

 807

 848

 884

 866

 859

 943

 923

 939

 888

 866

 902

 930

 916

 911

 904

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 21, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 513

 444

 463

 517

 509

 513

 536

 522

 525

 506

 509

 538

 557

 561

 548

 541

 515

 540

 562

 551

 547

 599

 586

 596

 565

 551

 573

 591

 582

 579

 575

TOTAL 26,406

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 513

 514

 508

 502

 504

 505

 507

 502

 504

 505

 506

 511

 514

 527

 558

 573

 556

 563

 540

 496

 479

 472

 478

 485

 492

 500

 506

 510

 515

 521

 523

 403

 431

 450

 443

 441

 461

 481

 486

 496

 496

 502

 493

 494

 484

 496

 499

 502

 497

 419

 390

 364

 375

 403

 421

 429

 459

 475

 480

 493

 499

 504

 459

 478

 473

 474

 479

 489

 498

 497

 500

 503

 504

 504

 502

 506

 518

 533

 534

 522

 489

 459

 431

 433

 448

 457

 462

 481

 493

 499

 506

 512

 516

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:June 1, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 300

 311

 308

 309

 312

 318

 324

 323

 325

 327

 327

 327

 326

 329

 336

 345

 346

 339

 318

 300

 282

 284

 293

 298

 302

 313

 321

 324

 329

 332

 335

TOTAL 15,159

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       70
                                                                      Exhibit 12
                               Idaho Power Company
                       Consolidated Financial Information
                                        
                       Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges



                                            Twelve Months Ended December 31,
                                                        (Thousands of Dollars)
                                            
                                            1990      1991      1992      1993      1994      1995
<S>                                      <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>                   
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to
 Fixed Charges:
   Consolidated net income               $ 69,241  $ 57,872  $ 59,990  $ 84,464  $ 74,930  $ 86,921

Income taxes:
  Income taxes (includes amounts charged
    to  other  income  and deductions)     26,418    24,321    24,601    38,057    35,307    49,497
   Investment  tax  credit adjustment      (3,184)   (3,177)   (1,439)   (1,583    (1,064)   (1,086)

      Total  income  taxes                 23,234    21,144    23,162    36,474    34,243    48,412

Income  before  income  taxes              92,475    79,016    83,152   120,938   109,173   135,333

Fixed Charges:
   Interest  on  long-term debt            50,119    54,370    53,408    53,706    51,173    51,146
  Amortization of debt discount,
     expense  and  premium  -  net            309       374       392       507       567       567
    Interest on short-term bank loans       1,027       935       647       220     1,157     3,144
    Other  interest                         2,259     3,297     1,011     2,023     1,537     1,598
    Interest  portion  of  rentals            902       884       683     1,077       794       925

      Total  fixed  charges                54,616    59,860    56,141    57,533    55,228    57,381

Earnings  -  as  defined                 $147,091  $138,876  $139,293  $178,471  $164,401  $192,714  
Ratio  of  earnings  to  fixed charges      2.69X     2.32X     2.48X     3.10X     2.98X     3.36X
</TABLE>
§ 463.38 How does a program providing integrated education and training under title II meet the requirement that the integrated education and training program be “for the purpose of educational and career advancement”? A provider meets the requirement that the integrated education and training program provided is for the purpose of educational and career advancement if: ( a ) The adult education component of the program is aligned with the State's content standards for adult education as described in the State's Unified or Combined State Plan; and
( b ) The integrated education and training program is part of a career pathway.
(Authority: 29 U.S.C. 3272, 3112)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5062 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5062

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 9930 Conroy Windermere Road in Windermere, Florida, as the ``Officer 
                 Robert German Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 2019

     Mrs. Demings (for herself, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Dunn, Mr. Yoho, Mr. 
 Rutherford, Mr. Lawson of Florida, Mr. Waltz, Mrs. Murphy of Florida, 
Mr. Posey, Mr. Soto, Mr. Webster of Florida, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Crist, 
 Ms. Castor of Florida, Mr. Spano, Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Steube, Mr. Mast, 
   Mr. Rooney of Florida, Mr. Hastings, Ms. Frankel, Mr. Deutch, Ms. 
    Wasserman Schultz, Ms. Wilson of Florida, Mr. Diaz-Balart, Ms. 
Mucarsel-Powell, and Ms. Shalala) introduced the following bill; which 
         was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 9930 Conroy Windermere Road in Windermere, Florida, as the ``Officer 
                 Robert German Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OFFICER ROBERT GERMAN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 9930 Conroy Windermere Road in Windermere, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Officer Robert German Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Officer 
Robert German Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 370.15 What must the Governor of a State do upon receipt of a copy of a designated agency's written appeal to the Secretary? ( a ) If the designated agency files a formal written appeal in accordance with § 370.14, the Governor shall, within 15 days of receipt of the designated agency's appeal, submit to the Secretary copies of the following: ( 1 ) The written notice of proposed redesignation sent to the designated agency.
( 2 ) The public notice of proposed redesignation.
( 3 ) Transcripts of all public hearings held on the proposed redesignation.
( 4 ) Written comments received by the Governor in response to the public notice of proposed redesignation.
( 5 ) The Governor's written decision to redesignate, including the rationale for the decision.
( 6 ) Any other written documentation or submissions the Governor wishes the Secretary to consider.
( 7 ) Any other information requested by the Secretary.
( b ) As part of the submissions under this section, the Governor may request an informal meeting with the Secretary at which representatives of both parties will have an opportunity to present their views on the issues raised in the appeal.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0520) (Authority: Sections 12(c) and 112(c)(1)(B) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 732(c)(1)(B))
(No. 74-CC-587

#### Standard Photo Supply, A Division of Weiman Co., Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 10, 1974.*

Fischel, Kahn, Weinberg & Brusslan, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C. J.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 564

 561

 671

 712

 577

 577

 571

 627

 623

 512

 510

 471

 441

 448

 484

 498

 490

 453

 430

 430

 447

 480

 730

 762

 777

 791

 817

 842

 807

 853

 874

 422

 366

 366

 333

 355

 388

 380

 365

 416

 433

 467

 435

 402

 416

 438

 474

 451

 420

 390

 378

 371

 397

 396

 384

 388

 377

 362

 355

 364

 344

 347

 495

 462

 460

 465

 466

 477

 459

 514

 523

 479

 479

 450

 418

 434

 467

 489

 476

 437

 422

 408

 421

 435

 498

 552

 540

 530

 529

 521

 501

 480

 505

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:April 12, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 322

 302

 300

 303

 304

 311

 300

 334

 339

 312

 312

 294

 274

 284

 305

 318

 310

 286

 277

 268

 276

 285

 324

 357

 350

 344

 343

 338

 326

 313

 328

TOTAL 14,792

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
Case 17-10180-KHK Doc 59 Filed 03/07/18 Entered 03/07/18 14:02:17 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 13
Case 17-10180-KHK Doc 59 Filed 03/07/18 Entered 03/07/18 14:02:17 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 13
Case 17-10180-KHK Doc 59 Filed 03/07/18 Entered 03/07/18 14:02:17 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 13
Case 17-10180-KHK Doc 59 Filed 03/07/18 Entered 03/07/18 14:02:17 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 13
Case 17-10180-KHK Doc 59 Filed 03/07/18 Entered 03/07/18 14:02:17 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 13
Case 17-10180-KHK Doc 59 Filed 03/07/18 Entered 03/07/18 14:02:17 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 13
Case 17-10180-KHK Doc 59 Filed 03/07/18 Entered 03/07/18 14:02:17 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 13
Case 17-10180-KHK Doc 59 Filed 03/07/18 Entered 03/07/18 14:02:17 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 13
Case 17-10180-KHK Doc 59 Filed 03/07/18 Entered 03/07/18 14:02:17 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 13
Case 17-10180-KHK Doc 59 Filed 03/07/18 Entered 03/07/18 14:02:17 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 13
Case 17-10180-KHK Doc 59 Filed 03/07/18 Entered 03/07/18 14:02:17 Desc Main

 Document Page 11 of 13
Case 17-10180-KHK Doc 59 Filed 03/07/18 Entered 03/07/18 14:02:17 Desc Main

 Document Page 12 of 13
Case 17-10180-KHK Doc 59 Filed 03/07/18 Entered 03/07/18 14:02:17 Desc Main

 Document Page 13 of 13