alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-1031 Directorate Identifier: 2011-NE-27-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection 2.5 $ 212.50 $11,025 $11,237.50 16 $179,800.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $179,800

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $0

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: This AD affects only 16 engines in the US. No one operator owns more than 3 

affected engines.

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 489

 474

 446

 380

 405

 432

 444

 457

 417

 436

 398

 430

 446

 425

 411

 429

 434

 423

 432

 443

 462

 465

 512

 755

 620

 545

 500

 500

 507

 513

 538

 475

 448

 325

 309

 302

 314

 323

 321

 325

 323

 337

 352

 352

 368

 367

 366

 363

 358

 366

 371

 375

 379

 386

 441

 505

 476

 447

 441

 437

 436

 446

 483

 466

 381

 335

 337

 350

 362

 367

 356

 358

 352

 372

 380

 388

 384

 389

 385

 381

 386

 395

 398

 404

 438

 588

 555

 500

 471

 468

 468

 468

 488

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:June 5, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 314

 304

 251

 223

 224

 232

 240

 243

 236

 237

 234

 246

 251

 256

 253

 256

 254

 251

 255

 260

 262

 266

 287

 379

 359

 325

 307

 305

 305

 305

 318

TOTAL 12,853

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, John Boschert, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Balsam Ventures, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                       



| | By:    | /s/
      John Boschert    
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | JOHN BOSCHERT              
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | August 14, 2008            





A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5110 

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to ensure 

representatives of aviation roundtables may participate in the NextGen 

performance-based navigation implementation process of the Federal 

Aviation Administration, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2019 

Ms. SPEIER (for herself, Mr. CASE, Ms. NORTON, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. PANETTA, Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. ROUDA, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. SUOZZI, 

Mr. RASKIN, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. SMITH of Washington, and Mr. NEGUSE) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to ensure representatives of aviation roundtables 

may participate in the NextGen performance-based navigation implementation process of the Federal Aviation 

Administration, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘All Participating in 

5 Process Reaching Informed Solutions for Everyone Act’’ 

6 or the ‘‘APPRISE Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5110 IH

1 SEC. 2. PERFORMANCE-BASED NAVIGATION IMPLEMENTA2 TION PROCESS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—In carrying out the implementa4 tion process for NextGen performance-based navigation 

5 (as described in FAA Order JO7100.41A, or any subse6 quent similar order), the Administrator of the Federal 

7 Aviation Administration shall ensure that any covered 

8 aviation roundtable may appoint a technical representative 

9 or consultant to participate as member of the core working 

10 group or the full working group of such process on the 

11 same terms and conditions as a representative of the in12 dustry, an airport, or a participating proponent of a proce13 dure. 

14 (b) COVERED AVIATION ROUNDTABLE DEFINED.— 

15 The term ‘‘covered aviation roundtable’’ means an aviation 

16 roundtable— 

17 (1) that is the actual or de facto proponent of 

18 a proposed new or modified performance-based navi19 gation flight procedure; or 

20 (2) for which the modified procedure path to be 

21 implemented in the process described in subsection 

22 (a) is within 5 miles of the jurisdictional area of the 

23 aviation roundtable. 

24 (c) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 180 days 

25 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator 

26 shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and InVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:12 Nov 26, 2019 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5110.IH H5110

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5110 IH

1 frastructure of the House of Representatives and the Com2 mittee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the 

3 Senate a report on the progress made toward imple4 menting the requirements under subsection (a). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
### §754e. Funds for contaminant sample analyses

In fiscal year 2012 and hereafter, of the amount provided for environmental contaminants, up to $1,000,000 may remain available until expended for contaminant sample analyses.

(Pub. L. 112–74, div. E, title I, Dec. 23, 2011, 125 Stat. 988.)
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Reflect Scientific, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), We, Kim Boyce, our Chief Executive Officer and director and Keith Merrell, our Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: 08/13/2010                            /s/Kim Boyce

                                                           Kim Boyce

                                                           Chief Executive Officer and Director

Dated: 08/13/2010                           /s/Keith Merrell

                                                          Keith Merrell

                                                          Chief Financial Officer
#### Jennie Surasky, as Administratrix of the Estate of Sam Surasky, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. Joseph Morgan et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Joseph Morgan, Plaintiff, v. Jennie Surasky, as Administratrix of the Estate of Sam Surasky, Deceased, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2

Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
Law Offices
                                 ALLAN M. LERNER
                           A Professional Association

                                                        Telephone: (954)563-8111
2888 East Oakland Park Boulevard                        Facsimile: (954)563-8522
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33306                            e.mail: AMLRWP@AOL.com
                                                                  --------------


                                  May 19, 2000

DAC Technologies Group International, Inc.
3200 North Ocean Boulevard
Suite 1006
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33308

Re:      Filing of 10QSB for DAC Technologies Group International, Inc.
         --------------------------------------------------------------

Gentlemen:

I hereby consent to the inclusion of my name with the Form 10Q-SB being filed on
behalf of DAC Technologies Group International, Inc. with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission.


                                                           Very truly yours,



                                                           Allan M. Lerner, P.A.
(No. 74-CC-168

#### Memorial Hospital of Springfield, Illinois, An Illinois Not-For-Profit Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 5, 1974.*

Brown, Hay & Stephens, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*441Per Curiam.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

 Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

January 5, 2017

Order 

Clerk

January 5, 2017

152916(74)(75)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 152916

v COA: 321200

Genesee CC: 13-032919-FH

TMANDO ALLEN DENSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motions of defendant-appellant for immediate 

consideration and to extend the time for filing his supplemental brief to February 23, 

2017, are GRANTED. The time for filing the supplemental brief of plaintiff-appellee is 

also extended to February 23, 2017.
#### § 602.29 Severability.

If any provision of this subpart or its application to any person, act, or practice is held invalid, the remainder of the subpart or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or practice shall not be affected thereby.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1099b)

[84 FR 58926, Nov. 1, 2019]
Exhibit  32.1




                             CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  906
                             OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002


In connection with the  annual  report  of  InterCare DX,  Inc.  (the "Company")
on  Form  10-QSB   for the period  ending  June 30,  2005  as filed with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission   on    the   date  hereof  (the  "Report"),
we,  Anthony  C.  Dike,  the  Chief  Executive  Officer,  certify,  pursuant  to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted pursuant to  Section 906  of  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002,  that:

(1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements of  Section  13(a) or
     15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all  material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

     A signed  original  of  this  written  statement  required  by Section 906,
or  other  document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or  otherwise adopting the
signature  that  appears  in  typed  form  within the electronic version of this
written   statement  required   by   Section   906,   has   been   provided   to
InterCare DX, Inc.,   and  will  be  retained   by   InterCare  DX, Inc..,   and
furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.


DATE: August 5,   2005          By:  /s/  Anthony  C.  Dike
                                        -------------------
                                         Anthony  C.  Dike
                                         Chairman  and  CEO
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Raymond Buholtz, Respondent, against Henry J. Kearse et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

*704Hill, P. J., Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Bliss and Schenck, JJ., dissent on the authority of *Matter of Marks*v. *Gray*(251 N. Y. 90).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 911

 884

 858

 855

 921

 1,015

 1,019

 1,028

 993

 987

 879

 737

 682

 770

 805

 792

 743

 748

 689

 732

 781

 766

 833

 859

 829

 738

 608

 589

 551

 565

 835

 795

 793

 823

 856

 925

 961

 950

 899

 895

 738

 632

 614

 607

 646

 630

 626

 602

 576

 590

 568

 608

 605

 616

 597

 564

 546

 533

 499

 492

 889

 832

 827

 835

 887

 962

 991

 990

 937

 953

 779

 679

 646

 668

 711

 678

 667

 658

 609

 633

 634

 689

 671

 702

 681

 630

 569

 556

 528

 532

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 565

 530

 527

 532

 564

 611

 628

 628

 595

 605

 497

 436

 415

 429

 455

 435

 428

 423

 392

 407

 408

 442

 431

 450

 437

 405

 368

 360

 342

 345

TOTAL 22,023

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of LegalPlay Entertainment Inc. on form
10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Cecil Morris,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



November 21, 2005
-------------------------------                 -------------------------------
(Date)                                          Cecil Morris
                                                Director, President / Secretary
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 398

 376

 383

 429

 387

 359

 356

 359

 378

 362

 381

 364

 359

 348

 400

 400

 394

 356

 332

 358

 395

 667

 868

 826

 834

 835

 839

 805

 830

 838

 319

 319

 310

 299

 267

 250

 270

 248

 265

 268

 256

 277

 288

 279

 241

 260

 260

 253

 280

 274

 284

 275

 395

 382

 382

 398

 421

 418

 413

 408

 352

 345

 350

 347

 304

 290

 301

 300

 308

 302

 299

 311

 312

 306

 304

 321

 315

 300

 308

 315

 320

 408

 554

 538

 553

 554

 564

 598

 596

 588

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:December 1, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 234

 229

 232

 230

 204

 195

 202

 201

 206

 203

 201

 208

 209

 205

 204

 214

 211

 201

 206

 211

 214

 268

 358

 348

 358

 358

 365

 386

 384

 379

TOTAL 11,563

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
§ 386.41 Under what circumstances does the Secretary grant a deferral or exception to performance or repayment under a scholarship agreement? Based upon sufficient evidence to substantiate the grounds as detailed in § 386.42, a repayment exception to or deferral of the requirements of § 386.40(a)(7) may be granted, in whole or in part, by the Secretary as follows: ( a ) Repayment is not required if the scholar— ( 1 ) Is unable to continue the course of study or perform the work obligation because of a permanent disability that meets one of the following conditions: ( i ) The disability had not been diagnosed at the time the scholar signed the agreement in § 386.34(c); or
( ii ) The disability did not prevent the scholar from performing the requirements of the course of study or the work obligation at the time the scholar signed the agreement in § 386.34(c) but subsequently worsened; or
( 2 ) Has died.
( b ) Repayment of a scholarship may be deferred during the time the scholar is— ( 1 ) Engaging in a full-time course of study in the field of rehabilitation at an institution of higher education;
( 2 ) Serving on active duty as a member of the armed services of the United States for a period not in excess of four years;
( 3 ) Serving as a volunteer under the Peace Corps Act;
( 4 ) Serving as a full-time volunteer under title I of the Domestic Volunteer Service Act of 1973;
( 5 ) Experiencing a temporary disability that affects the scholar's ability to continue the course of study or perform the work obligation, for a period not to exceed three years; or
( c ) Under limited circumstances as determined by the Secretary and based upon credible evidence submitted on behalf of the scholar, the Secretary may grant an exception to, or deferral of, the requirement to repay a scholarship in instances not specified in this section. These instances could include, but are not limited to, the care of a disabled spouse, partner, or child or the need to accompany a spouse or partner on active duty in the Armed Forces.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 302(b) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 772(b))
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in hiscapacity as an officer of Watson Wyatt Worldwide, Inc. (the “company”),for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

 

·                  The QuarterlyReport of the company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

·                  The informationcontained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the company.

 

 

Date: November 7, 2008

 
| /s/ John J. Haley                     |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| John J. Haley                         |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

 
| /s/ Roger F. Millay                        |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Roger F. Millay                            |   |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to WatsonWyatt Worldwide, Inc. and will be retained by Watson Wyatt Worldwide, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----