alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

 

**Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Frank J. Massino, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Senetek PLC for theyear ended December 31, 2005; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date ); and 

 

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of theEvaluation Date; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and 

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affectinternal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned officer of Moldflow Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies
that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 27, 2003 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit
(the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange
Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A)
shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or
otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

Date: November 12, 2003

                                          /s/ Suzanne E. MacCormack
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name:  Suzanne E. MacCormack
                                          Title: Executive Vice President of
                                                 Finance and Administration and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
----

| Dated:      January 2, 2008 |   |  By: /s/ Franklin C. Fisher,      Jr.                                                                                                                                                    |
|-----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        |   |  Name: Franklin C. Fisher,      Jr.                                                                                                                                                           |
|                        |   | Title:    President,      Chief Executive Officer and Chairman             (Principal Executive      Officer) |

| Dated:      January 2, 2008 |   |  By: /s/  Larry      A. Hornbrook                                                                                                                                                                    |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        |   | Name:   Larry      A. Hornbrook                                                                                                                                                                           |
|                        |   | Title:     Vice      President and Chief Financial Officer              (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer) |
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

37 

CA 12-00802 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

TOWN OF AMHERST AND GRANITE STATE 

INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

V ORDER

ARTHUR HILGER, SALLY BISHER, 

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, 

AND AARON HILGER, DEFENDANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

 

SMITH, MURPHY & SCHOEPPERLE, LLP, BUFFALO, MAURO LILLING NAPARTY LLP,

WOODBURY (MATTHEW W. NAPARTY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. 

SHAUB, AHMUTY, CITRIN & SPRATT, LLP, LAKE SUCCESS, DEMARIE &

SCHOENBORN, P.C., BUFFALO (JOSEPH DEMARIE OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS. 

MICHAEL JAFFE, NEW YORK CITY, FOR NEW YORK STATE TRIAL LAWYERS

ASSOCIATION, AMICUS CURIAE.

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Paula L.

Feroleto, J.), entered January 23, 2012. The order, among other

things, granted that part of plaintiffs’ motion seeking summary

judgment against defendants Arthur Hilger and Sally Bisher. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988;

Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; see

also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Entered: March 22, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE RESTRISTRANT



|                                     |  |                              
|------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Significant Subsidiaries             |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|                                     | 
|Herley Industries, Inc.              |  | Delaware                     
|d/b/a Herley Lancaster             |  |                              
|Herley Medical Products            |  |                              
|Herley New England                 |  |                              
|Herley Chicago                     |  |                              
|                                     | 
|Micro Systems, Inc.                  |  | Florida                      
|Herley-CTI, Inc.                     |  | Delaware                     
|Stapor Research, Inc.                |  | Virginia                     
|General Microwave Israel (1987) Ltd. |  | Israel                       
|Herley GMI Eyal Ltd.                 |  | Israel                       
|EW Simulation Technology Ltd.        |  | United Kingdom               
|                                     | 
|Other Active Subsidiaries            |  |                              
|                                     | 
|Herley-RSS, Inc.                     |  | Delaware                     
|General Microwave Corporation, Inc.  |  | New York                     
|d/b/a Herley New York              |  |                              
|HMS Investments, Inc.                |  | Delaware                     
|HMS Trading, Inc.                    |  | Delaware                     
|                                     | 
|Inactive Subsidiaries                |  |                              
|General Microwave Israel Corp.       |  | Delaware                     
|Micro-El Patent Corp.                |  | Delaware                     
|ICI Acquisition Corp.                |  | Delaware                     
|MSI Acquisition Corp.                |  | Delaware
#### § 33.40 Stays ordered by the Department of Justice.

If at any time the Attorney General or an Assistant Attorney General designated by the Attorney General transmits to the Department head a written finding that continuation of the administrative process described in this part with respect to a claim or statement may adversely affect any pending or potential criminal or civil action related to such claim or statement, the Department head stays the process immediately. The Department head orders the process resumed only upon receipt of the written authorization of the Attorney General.

(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3803(b)(3))
#### William Keeler, appellee, v. Charles Manwarren et al., appellants.

Filed April 10, 1901.

No. 9,456.

3. Absence of Bill of Exceptions: Presumption. In the absence of a bill of exceptions containing the evidence, an order made by the district court confirming sale of real estate is presumed to be correct, and supported by sufficient evidence.

*2.*Written Stipulation: Record: Bill oe Exceptions. A written stipulation of facts or mode of proof filed in a cause forms no part of the record, unless made so by a bill of exceptions. *State Ins. Go. v. Buelcstaff Bros. Mfg. Go.,*47 Nebr., 1.

Appeal from the district court *tor*Hitchcock county. Heard below before Norris, J.

*Affirmed.*

*John W. Cole,*for appellants.

*B. F. Smith, contra.*

Holcomb, J.

On an application to confirm a sale of real estate made under a decree in proceedings of foreclosure of a real estate mortgage the defendant objected to the confirmation on the ground that the notice of sale had not been published in a legal newspaper, within the meaning of chapter 49, Session Laws, 1895. We are prevented from reviewing the ruling.of the trial court on the objection, because the evidence on which the same was had has not been properly preserved in. a bill of exceptions. In the absence of a record containing the evidence, the presumptions are all in favor of the correctness of the ruling made, and the presumption will be that the same was based on sufficient evidence to sustain it. There is in *664the record no bill of exceptions or anything purporting to be one.

A stipulation of the parties as to the purported facts regarding the publication of the newspaper in which the notice was published is copied in, and sought to be made a part of, the transcript of the proceedings in the case, and certified to as such by the clerk. Such a stipulation is, however, no part of the transcript, and can- not be considered for the purpose of determining the sufficiency of the evidence introduced before the trial court in passing on the objections to confirmation. Says this court, in. *State Ins. Co. v. Buckstaff Bros. Mfg. Co.,*47 Nebr., 5: “The steps requisite to preserve the evidence upon which the jury found their verdict and the rulings of the court during the trial have not been taken. This could be accomplished only by a bill of exceptions duly settled in the mode required by statute. A stipulation of the attorneys in a cause is no more part of the record than a deposition or any other evidence which may have been improperly included in the transcript. Matters which are not properly part of the record can not be made so by being improperly inserted in the transcript. A stipulation of facts or mode of proof can not take the place of a bill of exceptions. *Credit Foncier of America v. Rogers,*8 Nebr., 34; *State v. Knapp,*8 Nebr., 436; *Herbison v. Taylor,*29 Nebr., 217; *McCarn v. Cooley,*30 Nebr., 552. This stipulation could have been brought into the record by a bill of exceptions; but that not having been done, it is not properly before the court, and hence it cannot be considered.”

The ruling complained of must be presumed and held to be supported by the evidence.

Affirmed.
§ 300.149 SEA responsibility for general supervision. ( a ) The SEA is responsible for ensuring— ( 1 ) That the requirements of this part are carried out; and
( 2 ) That each educational program for children with disabilities administered within the State, including each program administered by any other State or local agency (but not including elementary schools and secondary schools for Indian children operated or funded by the Secretary of the Interior)— ( i ) Is under the general supervision of the persons responsible for educational programs for children with disabilities in the SEA; and
( ii ) Meets the educational standards of the SEA (including the requirements of this part).
( 3 ) In carrying out this part with respect to homeless children, the requirements of subtitle B of title VII of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11431 *et seq.*) are met.
( b ) The State must have in effect policies and procedures to ensure that it complies with the monitoring and enforcement requirements in §§ 300.600 through 300.602 and §§ 300.606 through 300.608.
( c ) Part B of the Act does not limit the responsibility of agencies other than educational agencies for providing or paying some or all of the costs of FAPE to children with disabilities in the State.
( d ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, the Governor (or another individual pursuant to State law) may assign to any public agency in the State the responsibility of ensuring that the requirements of Part B of the Act are met with respect to students with disabilities who are convicted as adults under State law and incarcerated in adult prisons.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0030) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(11); 1416)
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

January-12

Note: Shaded area not verified with DFG data Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre Feet

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Jan-12 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 4 0 0 3,737 1,952 5,689 7,413 3,871 112-Jan-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4,082 1,955 6,037 8,096 3,878 113-Jan-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 4,082 1,957 6,038 8,096 3,881 114-Jan-12 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 3 0 0 4,082 1,950 6,031 8,096 3,867 115-Jan-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 4,081 1,950 6,031 8,095 3,867 116-Jan-12 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 3 0 0 4,082 1,953 6,035 8,096 3,874 117-Jan-12 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 3 0 0 4,080 1,952 6,032 8,093 3,872 118-Jan-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3,331 1,950 5,281 6,608 3,867 109-Jan-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3,331 1,945 5,276 6,608 3,857 10

10-Jan-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3,331 1,946 5,278 6,608 3,860 1011-Jan-12 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 3 0 0 3,331 1,946 5,277 6,608 3,859 1012-Jan-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4,080 1,943 6,023 8,093 3,853 11

13-Jan-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4,082 1,937 6,019 8,096 3,843 1114-Jan-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4,437 1,937 6,374 8,801 3,842 1215-Jan-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4,433 1,937 6,370 8,792 3,843 1216-Jan-12 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 2 0 0 3,707 1,932 5,639 7,352 3,833 1117-Jan-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3,550 1,933 5,484 7,042 3,835 1018-Jan-12 0 4 4 0 0 4 4 2 0 0 3,562 1,936 5,498 7,066 3,840 1019-Jan-12 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 3,866 1,938 5,804 7,668 3,845 1120-Jan-12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4,053 1,942 5,995 8,040 3,852 1121-Jan-12 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 2 0 0 4,191 1,954 6,145 8,313 3,875 1222-Jan-12 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 2 0 0 4,921 2,481 7,402 9,760 4,921 1423-Jan-12 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 3,287 2,708 5,994 6,519 5,371 11

24-Jan-12 0 4 4 1 5 0 5 2 0 0 3,716 2,709 6,425 7,370 5,373 1225-Jan-12 0 4 4 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 3,707 3,044 6,751 7,352 6,038 1326-Jan-12 0 5 5 1 0 4 4 2 0 0 2,605 3,155 5,761 5,168 6,258 1127-Jan-12 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 2,572 3,151 5,724 5,102 6,251 1128-Jan-12 0 4 4 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 3,331 3,141 6,472 6,608 6,230 1229-Jan-12 0 0 0 2 0 4 4 3 0 0 3,331 3,141 6,472 6,608 6,230 1230-Jan-12 0 12 12 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 3,331 3,151 6,482 6,608 6,250 12

31-Jan-12 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 2,506 3,160 5,666 4,970 6,268 11

Total 0 36 36 XXXX 49 16 65 XXXX 0 0 114,820 70,685 185,505 227,745 140,204 367

Official data is posted on DFG's webpage.

Banks Tracy Combined Banks 

Tracy Comb
### [§46. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–260, div. O, title X, §1002(1), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2155]

Section, added Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 825, §1, 70 Stat. 797; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(G), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147, penalized the transportation of alligator grass, water chestnut plants, and water hyacinth plants.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 13,070

 14,684

 7,622

 4,240

 2,457

 1,562

 1,096

 774

 1,144

 1,130

 1,120

 1,246

 1,815

 3,296

 2,354

 2,641

 2,273

 1,672

 1,131

 2,955

 1,289

 935

 948

 610

 1,417

 2,732

 4,485

 5,436

 5,329

 3,060

 1,561

 1,749

 1,509

 1,396

 405

 277

 220

 191

 179

 199

 204

 215

 222

 223

 221

 226

 240

 241

 284

 237

 233

 215

 205

 207

 202

 182

 180

 185

 183

 189

 206

 230

 6,166

 7,037

 4,077

 2,236

 1,178

 778

 580

 442

 510

 479

 449

 509

 546

 1,117

 791

 761

 882

 768

 570

 857

 483

 368

 355

 267

 321

 518

 736

 1,141

 1,008

 841

 520

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 14, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                        Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-53461, S-8 No. 333-32994, and S-8 No. 333-55044) of McLaren
Performance Technologies, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our report
dated November 28, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
of McLaren Performance Technologies, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form
10-KSB) for the year ended September 30, 2001, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

December 26, 2001
Detroit, Michigan
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 77206 / February 23, 2016

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-16846

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

:

UBS Financial Services :

Incorporated of Puerto Rico : EXTENSION ORDER

 :

:

Respondent. :

____________________________________:

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested an extension of time until 

June 7, 2016 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution under Rule 1101(a) of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 CFR 201.1101(a).

On September 29, 2015, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Administrative 

Proceedings Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making 

Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions (“Order”) against UBS Financial Services 

Incorporated of Puerto Rico (“Respondent”).1 The Order required Respondent to pay a total of 

$15,000,000.00 in disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil money penalties to the 

Commission and created a Fair Fund pursuant to Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 

2002, as amended.

In its request for an extension of time, the Division states that it needs to solicit 

proposals from the Fund Administrator Pool and finalize development of the distribution plan. 

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s request 

 

1 Exchange Act Rel. No. 76013 (September 29, 2015).
2

for an extension of time until June 7, 2016 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution is 

granted.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority. 

Brent J. Fields

Secretary
§ 361.405 Is Temporary Assistance for Needy Families a required one-stop partner? ( a ) Yes, TANF, authorized under part A of title IV of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 601 *et seq.*), is a required partner.
( b ) The Governor may determine that TANF will not be a required partner in the State, or within some specific local areas in the State. In this instance, the Governor must notify the Secretaries of the U.S. Departments of Labor and Health and Human Services in writing of this determination.
( c ) In States, or local areas within a State, where the Governor has determined that TANF is not required to be a partner, local TANF programs may still work in collaboration or partnership with the local one-stop centers to deliver employment and training services to the TANF population unless inconsistent with the Governor's direction.