alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                       [REI -- EXHIBIT 10(r)(2)]

                         HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
                             DIRECTOR BENEFITS PLAN

                           (Effective January 1, 1992)


                                 First Amendment


         Houston Industries Incorporated, a Texas corporation (the "Company"),
having adopted the Houston Industries Incorporated Director Benefits Plan,
effective January 1, 1992 (the "Plan"), and having reserved the right under
Section 6.01 thereof to amend the Plan, does hereby amend the Plan, effective as
of August 6, 1997, to read as follows:

         1. Section 4.01 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following
sentence to the end thereof:

     "Full years of service completed while a director of NorAm Energy Corp.,
     any predecessor thereto, or any division or subsidiary of NorAm Energy
     Corp., or while a director of any 'advisory board' of NorAm Energy Corp. or
     its subsidiaries or divisions, will be included in the calculation of full
     years of service under the Plan."

         2. New Section 4.04 is added to the Plan at the end of Article IV to
read as follows:

         "4.04 Benefit Offset. Notwithstanding any provision hereto to the
     contrary, the annual benefit amount payable to a Director calculated under
     Section 4.01 hereof shall be reduced by the amount of any annual benefit
     that the Director receives under the NorAm Energy Corp. Directors'
     Retirement Plan."



                                       -1-

<PAGE>   2



         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Houston Industries Incorporated has caused this
Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officers this 26th day of
February, 1998, but effective as of August 6, 1997.

                                        HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED



                                        By  /s/ LEE W. HOGAN
                                          --------------------------------------
                                            Name:   Lee W. Hogan
                                                 -------------------------------
                                            Title:   Executive Vice President
                                                  ------------------------------

ATTEST:

/s/ RICHARD B. DAUPHIN
-----------------------------------






                                      -2-
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 501

 470

 504

 548

 550

 545

 564

 546

 537

 528

 528

 565

 574

 544

 563

 581

 615

 550

 566

 576

 562

 570

 574

 581

 586

 600

 573

 566

 549

 548

 375

 370

 371

 387

 389

 380

 378

 379

 384

 381

 387

 404

 413

 442

 458

 467

 469

 439

 428

 420

 413

 406

 426

 456

 439

 489

 456

 453

 475

 454

 424

 413

 414

 428

 434

 433

 430

 437

 450

 452

 456

 491

 483

 501

 507

 520

 526

 509

 498

 502

 495

 487

 496

 512

 511

 535

 522

 514

 515

 511

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 15, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 278

 271

 272

 281

 284

 284

 282

 286

 294

 295

 298

 319

 314

 326

 329

 337

 341

 331

 324

 326

 322

 317

 323

 332

 332

 347

 339

 334

 334

 332

TOTAL 14,406

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,446                  13,033
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,196                   3,282
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                     867
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,642                  19,009
<PP&E>                                           8,570                  14,074
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,061                  84,262
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              433                  18,294
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                      21
<OTHER-SE>                                         944                  64,051
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,061                  84,262
<SALES>                                            432                  36,517
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   432                  36,517
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                  26,962
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    34                   8,337
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (756)                   (788)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,154                   2,006
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                     245
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,154                   1,761
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,165                   1,761
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.55                    0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.55                    0.83


</TABLE>
### §460x–14. Authorization of appropriations; adjustments

There are authorized to be appropriated not more than $84,149,558 for the acquisition of lands and interests in lands and not more than $18,769,000 (June 1970 prices) for development, plus or minus such amounts, if any, as may be justified by reason of ordinary fluctuations in construction costs as indicated by engineering cost indices applicable to the type of construction involved herein.

(Pub. L. 91–479, §15, Oct. 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 1081; Pub. L. 93–477, title I, §101(13), Oct. 26, 1974, 88 Stat. 1446; Pub. L. 97–361, §4, Oct. 22, 1982, 96 Stat. 1724; Pub. L. 98–141, §5, Oct. 31, 1983, 97 Stat. 909; Pub. L. 98–505, Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2337.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–505 substituted "$84,149,558" for "$82,149,558".

1983—Pub. L. 98–141 substituted "$82,149,558" for "$66,153,000".

1982—Pub. L. 97–361 substituted "$66,153,000" for "$57,753,000".

1974—Pub. L. 93–477 substituted "$57,753,000" for "$19,800,000".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Retroactive Statutory Ceilings

Pub. L. 97–361, §7, Oct. 22, 1982, 96 Stat. 1725, provided that: "For purposes of section 7(a)(3) of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 ([former] 16 U.S.C. 460l–9(a)(3)) [see 54 U.S.C. 200306(a)(4)], the statutory ceilings on appropriations established by the amendments made by this Act [enacting section 460x–15 of this title and amending this section and sections 460x–9 to 460x–11 of this title] shall be deemed to be statutory ceilings contained in a provision of law enacted prior to the convening of the Ninety-fifth Congress."
(No. 6020

#### Licata Moving and Storage Company, d/b/a Addison Van Lines, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Public Aid, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 8, 1972.*

Warren Krinsky, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST FOR 8-HOUR OZONE RACT SIP SU BMITTAL Planning Area: Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District Title 40 CFR, Part 51, Appendix V – Criteria for Determining the Completeness

of Plan Submissions Enclosed Notes

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS 2.1(a) Submittal Letter from Governor's Designee X See ARB Executive Order G-125-346.

2.1(b) Evidence of Adoption X See Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management Board Resolution No. 2006-073 as certified by Board Clerk 2.1(c) Legal Authority Citation X See ARB Executiv e Order G-125-346. 2.1(d) Copy of :

a. Attainment Plan b: Contingency Measures Not applicable

2.1(e) Evidence of Compliance with State's Procedural Requirements X See Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management Board Resolution No. 2006-073 as certified by Board Clerk and ARB Executive Order G-125- 346. 2.1(f) Evidence of Public Notice Consistent with 40 CFR part 51.102 X See Enclosure 5 of the District submittal. 2.1(g) Certification of Public Hearing in Accordance with Notice X See Enclosure 5 of the District submittal. 2.1(h) Compilation of Public Comments and Responses X See Enclosure 6 of the District submittal.

2.2(a) Identification of Regulated Pollutant Not applicable.
2.2(b) Identification of Attainment Area/Status N ot applicable.
2.2(c) Estimate of Plan's Impact on Emissions Not applicable.
2.2(d) Demonstration that Plan Approval/Implementation Protects NAAQS Not applicable.
2.2(e) Modeling Support Not applicable. 2.2(f)- Compliance/Enforcement and 2.2(i) Justification Not applicable.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Te xas**  April 18, 2019 No. 04
- 19
- 00039
- CR & 04
- 19
- 00040
- CR Darrell Wayne MOFFETT , Appellant
v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court No. B1779 & B1780 Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding 

### O RDER We grant the State’s motions to consolidate appeal numbers 04
- 19
- 00039
- CR and 04
- 19
- 00040
- CR, and order these appeals are consolidated. See, e.g. , Katzenmaier v. State , No. 04
- 18
- 00173
- CR, 2018 WL 2694462, at *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio June 6, 2018, n o pet.) (mem. op.) (per curiam) (consolidating appeals “[i]n the interest of efficient administration of [the] court’s docket”). We order the parties to file all future motions, briefs, and other pleadings as if the appeals were one, but to p ut both appeal numbers in the style of the case. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 9.4(g) (requiring a filed document’s front cover to contain “the case number”). However, the record filed in each appeal will remain separate and, if supplementation of the record becomes necessary, the supplemental material must be filed in the appeal to which it applies. The court will dispose of both appeals in the same judgment, opinion, and mandate.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 18th day of April, 2019
.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE , Clerk of Court
### §1551a. Bonded cartmen or lightermen

The Secretary of the Treasury be, and he is, authorized, when it appears to him to be in the interest of commerce, and notwithstanding any provision of law or regulation requiring that the transportation of imported merchandise be by a bonded common carrier, to permit such merchandise which has been entered and examined for customs purposes to be transported by bonded cartmen or bonded lightermen between the ports of New York, Newark, and Perth Amboy, which are all included in Customs Collection District Numbered 10 (New York): Provided, That this resolution shall not be construed to deprive any of the ports affected of its rights and privileges as a port of entry.

(June 19, 1936, ch. 611, 49 Stat. 1538.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of Tariff Act of 1930 which comprises this chapter.
Opinion issued Dec ember 6 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 16 - 00678 - CR

——————————— IN RE DEMONTRE GREGO RY CLARK , Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION D emontre Gregory Clark seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to hold a hearing on his motion for new trial. Because we hold Clark has not shown entitlement to mandamus relief, we deny the petition. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Brown.2

Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).
§ 656.6 What regulations apply? The following regulations apply to this program: ( a ) The regulations in 34 CFR part 655.
( b ) The regulations in this part 656.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1122)
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

mar Senator Eelley~ opraioll lo& \ 

c or not the 
Honorable Rogers ~ielley, Pago 3 

In irecpLng With our construction of Section 2 

of the original Aot, your ilill under 0onsWeretion likewtse requires the secretary to the Board to be selected 

from ansong the amxihershlp OP the Board. We construe 

your kIill,as WQ oonstrued the original not, to be not 

the czeetion of an offloe or position fiatsower, but 

-rely the superadding to the duties of the partfoular 

hoard member selootod the further duties of those oi' 

Sc)gretarp-Treasurer to the ntmrd. There is there?o?e 

but one OffLCe or position -- that is, membership in the 

POard . 

Par the reasons just stated, the 00nstltutional 

poti8i.0~1 against dual offlo%-holding hate no applleafion. 

Seat&on 40, of Article XVI 0P the Constitution merely Porbids the holding of *more than one oivil of'f+%ae of' tm~luarant l í 

Seotion 33 of the same Article forbids the aoOountinS officers 0f the State to &a~ or PsrJ a warrant 

upon the treasury in favor of any person Pa salary Or 

Oolapensation as agent, ofiiaer or appointee, who *holds 

at the saate time any other offloe or position of honor, 

trust or profit under th2.s State or the United States.* 

Uxter the fasts stated by you, the status of the Semetax-y-Treasurer to the Board Of Texas College of Arts aud 

Irdustries, as provided i.n yaur &mate Bill No. 33, muld 

lje that of a utember of the Board oi Texas College W Arts 

aad xudustrios -- ona offtae or position - am3 under the 

terPg of the Bill, in the went it boWmes a lsw, there 

rould be PO val%U reason why the BOard should not pay the 

~osqnmsation to the So~retary-'Proasurer thorefn stipulated. 

Very truly pure 

ATTOLW3X GBNNR1Lt OF TX3 

&..cPROVDm 10, I%1
§ 1275.8 Procedures affecting States in noncompliance. ( a ) Each fiscal year, each State determined to be in noncompliance with 23 U.S.C. 164 and this part will be advised of the funds reserved from apportionment under § 1275.6 in the notice of apportionments required under 23 U.S.C. 104(e), which normally occurs on October 1.
( b ) Each State whose funds are reserved under § 1275.6 will be afforded 30 days from the date the funds are reserved to submit documentation showing why it is in compliance (which may include a “general practice” certification under § 1275.5). Documentation must be submitted to the appropriate NHTSA Regional Administrator. If such documentation is provided, a reservation will remain in place on the State's affected funds while the agencies consider the information. If the agencies affirm the noncompliance determination, the State will be notified of the decision and the affected funds will be processed in accordance with the requests regarding the derivation and distribution of funds provided by the State as required by §§ 1275.6(b) and 1275.7(a).
[81 FR 67168, Sept. 30, 2016, as amended at 84 FR 2734, Feb. 8, 2019]
#### Alfred Johnson, Appellant, *v.*Manhattan and Queens Traction Corporation, Respondent.

Second Department,

May 29, 1914.

County Court—jurisdiction over railroad corporation under Laws of 1899, chapter 330 — process — pleading—facts once shown presumed to exist.

Under chapter 830 of the Laws of 1899, giving a County Court jurisdiction over a railroad corporation “ where any portion of the road operated by it is within the county,” jurisdiction arises from the residence of the defendant and not from the place of service of process, which may be made in any county of the State.

Hence, in an action against such a corporation operating within the county of Queens, service of process may be made in the county of Hew York, where said corporation had its principal office.

*754Although the complaint did not aver that the defendant “ now ” operates a road in Queens county, the words “at all times herein mentioned” were sufficient within the rule that facts once shown are presumed to continue.

Appeal by the plaintiff, Alfred Johnson, from a judgment of the County Court of Queens county in favor of the defendant. entered in the office of the clerk of said county on the 29th day of January, 1914, upon the dismissal of the complaint at the opening of the trial by direction of the court. The dismissal was on the ground that defendant’s principal office being in the county of New York, and the summons and complaint not having been served in Queens county, the court had no jurisdiction of the defendant’s person.

*G. J. Martin,*for the appellant.

*Robert S. Sloan,*for the respondent.

Putnam, J.:

As Laws of 1899, chapter 320 (amending Code Civ. Proc. § 341), gave jurisdiction over a railroad corporation “where any portion of the road operated by it is within the county,” such a railroad corporation is thereby made a resident of the county within which it operates. While the complaint does not aver that the defendant “now” operates a road in Queens county, the words “at all times herein mentioned” are sufficient within the rule that facts once shown are presumed to continue. When the jurisdiction of the County Court arises from the residence of the defendant, such a defendant may be served with process in any county of the State. (Code Civ. Proc. § 347.)

As the County Court’s jurisdiction here arose from the defendant’s residence, and not from the place of service of the summons, service in New York county gave jurisdiction.

. The judgment of the County Court of Queens county reversed and a new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.

Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.

Judgment of the County Court of Queens county reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT-TIMOTHY J. KORMAN



 Exhibit 10.4 
 AMENDMENT TO 
 SENIOR EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 WITH 
 TIMOTHY J. KORMAN

 This Amendment to Senior Executive Employment Agreement is made as of this 17 day of July, 2007, by and between HILB ROGAL &
HOBBS COMPANY (the “Company”) and TIMOTHY J. KORMAN (the “Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into
a Senior Executive Employment Agreement effective as of December 1, 2001, pursuant to which Company employs Executive as Executive Vice President – Finance and Administration of the Company (the “Employment Agreement”); and

 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend certain provisions of Article III of the Employment Agreement relating to the
compensation of the Executive. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
  

	 	1.	Paragraphs (C) and (D) of Article III of the Employment Agreement are hereby amended to provide as follows: 

  

	 	(C)	Ancillary Benefits. 

 The Executive shall also be
entitled to vacations, participation in the Company’s Profit Sharing Savings Plan (401K), Executive Voluntary Deferral Plan, Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and Supplemental Cash Incentive Plan, sick leave benefits, post-retirement
benefit plan, and all other ancillary benefits provided by the Company, including, but not limited to, group life, health and disability insurance coverage, consistent with the compensation policies and practices of the Company from time to time
prevailing with respect to persons who are executive officers of the Company. 
  

	 	(D)	Stock Based Awards. 

 The Executive shall receive
such stock option, restricted stock and other equity-based compensation awards each year as determined by the Human Resources & Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors in its sole discretion. 
  

	 	2.	All other provisions of the Employment Agreement are to remain in full force and effect.

 WITNESS the following signatures as of the date first above written. 
  

									
	EXECUTIVE	 		 	HILB ROGAL & HOBBS COMPANY
					
	By:	 	/s/  Timothy J. Korman        	 		 	By:	 	/s/  A. Brent King        
		 	 Timothy J. Korman
 Executive Vice President –
Mergers and Acquisitions
	 		 		 	 A. Brent King
 Vice President and General
Counsel
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clancy Systems International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  September 30,
 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
 hereof  (the "Report"), I, Stanley J. Wolfson, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

/s/   Stanley J. Wolfson

Chief Executive Officer
January 10, 2005



<PAGE>
exv10w4



 





Exhibit 10.4




FORM OF

LETTER AGREEMENT FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES




ATLAS ACQUISITION HOLDINGS CORP.




                    , 2007




Hauslein & Company, Inc.




Gentlemen:



This letter will confirm our agreement, that commencing on the consummation date (the “Closing
Date”) of the initial public offering (“IPO”) of the securities of Atlas Acquisition
Holdings Corp. (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of the consummation by the
Company of a “Business Combination” or the liquidation of the Company (each, as described
in the Company’s IPO prospectus, and such earlier date, the “Termination Date”), Hauslein &
Company, Inc. shall make available to the Company for certain administrative, technology, and
secretarial services, as well as the use of certain limited office space, in the Hobe Sound,
Florida area, as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 11450 SE Dixie
Highway, Suite 105, Hobe Sound, Florida 33455 (or any successor location) and any other locations.
In exchange therefor, the Company shall pay to Hauslein & Company, Inc. the sum of $10,000 per
month (the “Fee”) on the Closing Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the
Termination Date.




[Signatures appear on following page]




 









 





	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,





ATLAS ACQUISITION HOLDINGS CORP.

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Name:  	James N. Hauslein 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:



HAUSLEIN & COMPANY, INC.

 	 	 
	By:  	 	 	 
	 	Name:  	James N. Hauslein 	 	 
	 	Title:  	President