alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 299.1 What are the purpose and scope of the regulations in this part? ( a ) This part establishes uniform administrative rules for programs in titles I through VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA). As indicated in particular sections of this part, certain provisions apply only to a specific group of programs.
( b ) If an ESEA program does not have implementing regulations, the Secretary implements the program under the authorizing statute and, to the extent applicable, title VIII of the ESEA, the General Education Provisions Act, the regulations in this part, EDGAR (34 CFR parts 75 through 99), and 2 CFR parts 180, as adopted at 2 CFR part 3485, and 200, as adopted at 2 CFR part 3474, that are not inconsistent with specific statutory provisions of the ESEA.
[84 FR 31678, July 2, 2019]
437 P.2d 166

#### Paul W. SWANSON, Relator, v. Frank B. ZINN, District Judge of the Eleventh Judicial District in and for the County of McKinley, Respondent.

No. 8575.

Supreme Oourt of New Mexico.

Feb. 7, 1968.

CHAVEZ, Chief Justice, and NOBLE, MOISE, COMPTON and CARMODY, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that the alternative writ of prohibition heretofore issued herein on December 27,1967, be and the same is hereby made permanent.
§ 660.1 What is the International Research and Studies Program? The Secretary may, directly or through grants or contracts, conduct research and studies which contribute to the purposes of the International Education Program authorized by part A of title VI of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA). The research and studies may include, but are not limited to— ( a ) Studies and surveys to determine needs for increased or improved instruction in modern foreign languages, area studies, or other international fields, including the demand for foreign language, area, and other international specialists in government, education, and the private sector;
( b ) Research on more effective methods of providing instruction and achieving competency in foreign languages, area studies, or other international fields;
( c ) Research on applying performance tests and standards across all areas of foreign language instruction and classroom use;
( d ) Developing and publishing specialized materials for use in foreign language, area studies, and other international fields or for training foreign language, area, and other international specialists;
( e ) Studies and surveys to assess the use of graduates of programs supported under title VI of the HEA by governmental, educational, and private-sector organizations and other studies assessing the outcomes and effectiveness of supported programs;
( f ) Comparative studies of the effectiveness of strategies to provide international capabilities at institutions of higher education;
( g ) Evaluations of the extent to which programs assisted under title VI of the HEA that address national needs would not otherwise be offered;
( h ) Studies and surveys of the use of technologies in foreign language, area studies, and international studies programs;
( i ) Studies and evaluations of effective practices in the dissemination of international information, materials, research, teaching strategies, and testing techniques throughout the educational community, including elementary and secondary schools;
( j ) Evaluations of the extent to which programs assisted under title VI of the HEA reflect diverse perspectives and a wide range of views and generate debate on world regions and international affairs, as described in the grantee's application;
( k ) Systematic collection, analysis, and dissemination of data that contribute to achieving the purposes of title VI, part A of the HEA; and
( l ) Support for programs or activities to make data collected, analyzed, or disseminated under this part publicly available and easy to understand.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1125)
[47 FR 14124, Apr. 1, 1982, as amended at 58 FR 32577, June 10, 1993; 64 FR 7740, Feb. 16, 1999; 74 FR 35074, July 17, 2009]
§ 241.6 Administrative stay of removal. ( a ) Any request of an alien under a final order of deportation or removal for a stay of deportation or removal shall be filed on Form I-246, Stay of Removal, with the district director having jurisdiction over the place where the alien is at the time of filing. The Commissioner, Deputy Commissioner, Executive Associate Commissioner for Field Operations, Deputy Executive Associate Commissioner for Detention and Removal, the Director of the Office of Juvenile Affairs, regional directors, or district director, in his or her discretion and in consideration of factors listed in 8 CFR 212.5 and section 241(c) of the Act, may grant a stay of removal or deportation for such time and under such conditions as he or she may deem appropriate. Neither the request nor failure to receive notice of disposition of the request shall delay removal or relieve the alien from strict compliance with any outstanding notice to surrender for deportation or removal.
( b ) Denial by the Commissioner, Deputy Commissioner, Executive Associate Commissioner for Field Operations, Deputy Executive Associate Commissioner for Detention and Removal, Director of the Office of Juvenile Affairs, regional director, or district director of a request for a stay is not appealable, but such denial shall not preclude an immigration judge or the Board from granting a stay in connection with a previously filed motion to reopen or a motion to reconsider as provided in 8 CFR part 3.
( c ) The Service shall take all reasonable steps to comply with a stay granted by an immigration judge or the Board. However, such a stay shall cease to have effect if granted (or communicated) after the alien has been placed aboard an aircraft or other conveyance for removal and the normal boarding has been completed.
[65 FR 80298, Dec. 21, 2000, as amended at 67 FR 39259, June 7, 2002]
#### Alonzo D. Buddington *vs.*Daniel Knowles and another.

A verdict was rendered for $66 damages, and the defendant moved for a new trial on the ground that the damages were excessive. Motion denied on the ground that the suni was too trivial to warrant a renewal of the controversy.

Trespass on the case, for damages to the plaintiff’s land by flooding it. Verdict for the plaintiff for $66. Motion by defendant for a new trial on the ground that the damages were excessive and against the evidence.

*Crump*and Converse, in support of the motion.

*Willey,*contra.

Ellsworth, J.

It is a sufficient objection to granting a new trial for excessive damages, that the verdict is only for $66, an amount too trivial to warrant a- renewal of the controversy, unless courts of justice are kept open to gratify the evil passions of mankind. To grant the defendant’s request will be to punish the defendant himself, were it certain that the damages would be reduced on another trial, which however it is not, either as matter of law on the evidence before us, or as a matter of fact. Such a practice we can not encourage, and we take this opportunity to say that a new trial in such cases should not be asked for, unless the case be one which involves something more than a trifling sum of money.

But, independently of this objection, we do not see sufficient ground for disturbing the verdict. [The judge here proceeds to consider the evidence, but as no question of general interest is involved, and as it would require a statement of the evidence to make the case understood, this part of the opinion is omitted.]

In this opinion the other judges concurred; except Sanford, J., who did not sit.
#### Simon Heilbrunn v. North British and Mercantile Insurance Company.

—Application granted. Order signed. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1546

SAMUEL LEROY SMITH , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. AIKEN COUNTY GOVERNMENT; CLAY KILLIAN, County Administrator; COUNTY COUNCIL; NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken

. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 1:18

- cv
- 00779

- HMH )

Submitted : September 18, 2018 Decided: September 20, 2018

Before WILKINSON and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Samuel L eroy Smith , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Samuel Leroy Smith filed a personal injury action and t he district court referred the matter to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge recommended dismissing the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and adv ised Smith that failure to file timely , specific objections to the recommendation could result in waiver of appellate review of a district court order based on the recommendation. Despite this warning, Smith failed to file specific objections.
The distri ct court adopted the recommendation and dismissed Smith’s complaint for lack of jurisdiction. Smith appeals. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge ’ s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845

- 46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Smith
has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materia ls before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### Part 4—Trade Adjustment Assistance for Communities

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1893 of Pub. L. 111–5, which provided for Feb. 13, 2011, termination of general amendment of this part by Pub. L. 111–5, was repealed by Pub. L. 112–40, title II, §201(a), Oct. 21, 2011, 125 Stat. 403, and the provisions of this part, as amended by Pub. L. 111–5 and as in effect on Feb. 12, 2011, were revived, effective Oct. 21, 2011, by Pub. L. 112–40, §201(b), (c). See Amendment of Part notes below.

#### Amendment of Part

Pub. L. 112–40, title II, §222(a)(1), (2), Oct. 21, 2011, 125 Stat. 411, amended this part by striking out subparts A "Trade Adjustment Assistance for Communities" (§2371 et seq.), C "Industry or Sector Partnership Grant Program for Communities Impacted by Trade" (§2373 et seq.), and D "General Provisions" (§2374) and designation and heading of subpart B "Community College and Career Training Grant Program" (§2372 et seq.).

Pub. L. 112–40, title II, §201(b), (c), Oct. 21, 2011, 125 Stat. 403, revived the provisions of this part, as in effect on Feb. 12, 2011. See Codification note above and note below.

Pub. L. 111–5, div. B, title I, §1872(a), Feb. 17, 2009, 123 Stat. 401, temporarily generally amended this part. See Codification note above.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Revival

For revival and applicability of provisions as in effect on Feb. 12, 2011, see section 201(b), (c) of Pub. L. 112–40, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 2011 Revival note preceding section 2271 of this title.
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Ulticom, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2010 (the "Report"), I, Shawn K. Osborne,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Mark A. Kissman,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:





(1)   the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/   Shawn K. OsborneShawn K. OsbornePresident andChief Executive OfficerPrincipal Executive OfficerJune 9, 2010











/s/ Mark A. KissmanMark A. KissmanSenior Vice President andChief Financial OfficerPrincipal Financial OfficerJune 9, 2010








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
### §3155. Annual reports

Each chief pretrial services officer in districts in which pretrial services are established under section 3152(b) of this title, and each chief probation officer in all other districts, shall prepare an annual report to the chief judge of the district court concerning the administration and operation of pretrial services and shall ensure that case file, statistical, and other information concerning the work of pretrial services is provided to the Director. The Director shall be required to include in the Director's annual report to the Judicial Conference under section 604 of title 28 a report on the administration and operation of the pretrial services for the previous year.

(Added Pub. L. 93–619, title II, §201, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2088; amended Pub. L. 97–267, §5, Sept. 27, 1982, 96 Stat. 1138; Pub. L. 113–235, div. E, title III, §308, Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2352.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–235, in first sentence, struck out "and the Director" after "chief judge of the district court" and inserted at end "and shall ensure that case file, statistical, and other information concerning the work of pretrial services is provided to the Director".

1982—Pub. L. 97–267 substituted provisions that each pretrial services officer or chief probation officer shall prepare an annual report to the chief judge of the district court and to the Director concerning the administration and operation of pretrial services and that the Director must include in the Director's annual report to the Judicial Conference a report on the administration and operation of the pretrial services for the previous year for provisions relating to the Director's annual report to Congress, the contents of the Director's fourth annual report, and that on or before the expiration of the forty-eighth-month period following July 1, 1975, the Director would file a comprehensive report with Congress concerning the administration and operation of the amendments made by the Speedy Trial Act of 1974, including his views and recommendations with respect thereto.
§ 646.30 What are allowable costs? The cost principles that apply to the Student Support Services Program are in 2 CFR part 200, subpart E. Allowable costs include the following if they are reasonably related to the objectives of the project: ( a ) Cost of remedial and special classes if— ( 1 ) These classes are not otherwise available at the grantee institution;
( 2 ) Are limited to eligible project participants; and
( 3 ) Project participants are not charged tuition for classes paid for by the project.
( b ) Courses in English language instruction for students of limited English proficiency if these classes are limited to eligible project participants and not otherwise available at the grantee institution.
( c ) In-service training of project staff.
( d ) Activities of an academic or cultural nature, such as field trips, special lectures, and symposiums, that have as their purpose the improvement of the participants' academic progress and personal development.
( e ) Transportation and, with the prior approval of the Secretary, meals and lodging for participants and staff during approved educational and cultural activities sponsored by the project.
( f ) Purchase, lease, or rental of computer hardware, software, and other equipment, service agreements for such equipment, and supplies for participant development, project administration, or project recordkeeping.
( g ) Professional development travel for staff if directly related to the project's overall purpose and activities, except that these costs may not exceed four percent of total project salaries. The Secretary may adjust this percentage if the applicant demonstrates to the Secretary's satisfaction that a higher percentage is necessary and reasonable.
( h ) Project evaluation that is directly related to assessing the project's impact on student achievement and improving the delivery of services.
( i ) Grant aid to eligible students who— ( 1 ) Are in their first two years of postsecondary education and who are receiving Federal Pell Grants under subpart 1 of part A of title IV of the Act; or
( 2 ) Have completed their first two years of postsecondary education and who are receiving Federal Pell Grants under subpart 1 of part A of title IV of the Act if the institution demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Secretary that— ( i ) These students are at high risk of dropping out; and
( ii ) It will first meet the needs of all its eligible first- and second-year students for services under this paragraph.
( j ) Temporary housing during breaks in the academic year for— ( 1 ) Students who are homeless children and youths or were formerly homeless children and youths; and
( 2 ) Students who are foster care youth.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-14)
[61 FR 38537, July 24, 1996, 75 FR 65793, Oct. 26, 2010; 79 FR 76103, Dec. 19, 2014]
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 (the Report), which accompanies this certification, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
 
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such quarter and the results
of operations of the Registrant for such quarter.
  /s/ Barry D. QuartBarry D. Quart, Pharm.D.President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ John W. BeckJohn W. Beck, C.P.A.Senior Vice President, Finance and
Operations and Chief Financial Officer (As
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  Note:
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Ardea Biosciences, Inc. and will be retained by Ardea Biosciences, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 564

 540

 547

 604

 623

 550

 510

 516

 551

 584

 630

 649

 668

 676

 672

 632

 354

 383

 398

 405

 561

 570

 456

 447

 489

 506

 454

 514

 430

 444

 498

 455

 451

 65

 360

 368

 333

 339

 358

 340

 347

 333

 326

 313

 306

 313

 335

 349

 366

 359

 412

 334

 362

 381

 414

 389

 351

 346

 412

 410

 518

 495

 493

 469

 495

 465

 434

 433

 459

 480

 475

 452

 479

 458

 440

 391

 344

 366

 380

 384

 470

 427

 394

 418

 452

 447

 400

 427

 422

 421

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 336

 322

 321

 306

 322

 303

 284

 284

 300

 313

 310

 295

 312

 299

 288

 258

 229

 242

 251

 253

 306

 280

 259

 274

 295

 292

 263

 280

 277

 276

TOTAL 13,188

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
EPA Docket ID# EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0817 

Presentation for Hearing on August 16, 2012- Arlington, Texas 

Speaker: Melissa Ashmore 

Member, Fort Worth Interfaith Power and Light 

Student of Theology 

2529 Greenhaven Dr 

Burleson TX 76028 

817-668-5933 

mashmore@ants.edu 

First, I want to acknowledge the hard work and time each person has committed to being here today. I know many 

people who were unable to be here today because of scheduling conflicts. I appreciate each and every person who has 

come out today. I especially recognize those who have left their homes to travel here today. 

As you might have noticed by driving down 1-30, we have signs alerting people when it is unsafe to be outside. You 

might have also noticed how many outdoor venues there are in this corridor of DFW where Texas children line up 

outdoors: Six Flags, Hurricane Harbor, outdoor theatres, the Ball Park and more. These are just a fraction of our 

nation's people who may not understand the risks of being outside on air alert days. Nor should they have to. 

I know that no one goes into public service administration unless they care about the common good. Certainly those 

who accept employment with the Environmental Protection Administration demonstrate their commitment to the 

environment. No one goes into business working in the cement industry with the express wish to harm people. People 

are supporting themselves, their communities and their families like the rest of us. Many have taken measure to make 

their plants safer than they used to be. Each of us is trying to do the right thing. But we still have work to do. 

- t~ .f each persoJ has heard a lot of statistics by now. Among them that, a two year delays could cause up to 5,000 deaths. 

And I think by now, that each person also understands that we as a community care about those statistics as human 

beings- some of them our neighbors, some of them our children. 

I am here to let you know that those of us in the community of faith care too. From my own personal faith, it is the 

example of Jesus to love our neighbors. Leading a good Christian life might mean giving money to charity and feeding 

those without food but it is also about protecting others from harm as I would my own family. Our Creator calls us to go 

beyond mere charity, to protect others. For many of my colleagues, their own faith has lead them to a similar 

conclusion. Our faith traditions demand not only charity, but also that we protect people from harm. 

I stand for those people who are on your charts as statistics. I stand for those whose voice will be silenced by soot. We 

call on the EPA to safeguard the health of our community and nation by implementing emission standards on toxic 

cement kiln pollution without weakening them and without delay. We challenge each person present to find a way to do 

the right thing, to do what is in your heart. 

Respectfully and prayerfully submitted, 

a 

Melissa CAshmore
#### Anthony Quinn, Respondent, v. Matthew J. Cahill, Appellant.

Judgment and order of the County Court of Richmond county affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas and Stapleton, JJ., concurred; Hirschberg, J., not voting.
Case 19-13121-KHK Doc 1-2 Filed 09/19/19 Entered 09/19/19 18:20:54 Desc 

 Statement of Operations Page 1 of 1