alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 366

 374

 359

 360

 349

 366

 350

 339

 324

 305

 315

 310

 321

 290

 224

 256

 291

 335

 362

 337

 293

 301

 325

 284

 319

 298

 311

 312

 280

 302

 365

 335

 343

 332

 334

 333

 334

 337

 301

 271

 258

 257

 252

 260

 220

 174

 211

 224

 248

 318

 270

 267

 242

 232

 219

 229

 237

 259

 265

 243

 261

 278

 345

 357

 341

 346

 340

 348

 341

 316

 298

 276

 278

 271

 282

 248

 201

 223

 253

 304

 346

 309

 276

 262

 276

 236

 264

 265

 288

 280

 263

 281

 330

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 4, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 229

 237

 227

 230

 226

 231

 227

 211

 200

 187

 188

 183

 190

 169

 140

 154

 172

 204

 230

 207

 187

 178

 187

 162

 179

 180

 194

 189

 179

 190

 220

TOTAL 9,044

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
!"#$

"% &'()*$)+
,






	






	

	









-
	


	









 





  

  


	  	

  	  	


  
 !"    



#

  $
 %
  
 

 
	

		
&	



"
'
&
	"

	
 !" 	&(



	)


%
*+,-
&(.

/+,-



			(





 &
0&	


%


&&

1) 22,34	,**/	

	


%(

		
5&





(
	



&







"6	

	&
	





6	(		&

&
(





7)89!9:;.!#9!9#

<

,  7

&	(


#

=
	

'	


&%

/3,

 
>
	

%
	

	




%
(
	


%




8?7.??#!9@)A!78

!

>9
7$


-3,9
:"	)





!%	B(*,-

7


<1+/4111++

%
<1+/4111,1

7"
:$B):?1+4

C@8&B):?D1+

8
"7"(B):?43,*/

		
	


Case 19-34574-KRH Doc 258 Filed 11/26/19 Entered 11/26/19 11:47:30 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
, 7

E!?79#

 

$
	%


%&
F,3,-D++





	 
5&


	


6 	
	 $



$




%

5&


	



$
&

0&	

"


(
"

7

 

47&




#

=




-++&
&

	
	

'

	
	"

 &



	

&$


%

	





,+	"	



	
(


$


(

%



$





	

7&



'

	
	

7&


 %#
	



"	%







  (
  

  (  % 
  




   

  #

 &
  
	  " "




&

%

	


	
	&


$


"&%%



%

5&


	

6
'





7&


&

G$
	(
	

(

 

 
$ 
 0


 " 


%  

 &(
 " 

 




6		
	&



&

	"

 &





	

  &

  
'
  

 7&


  % #
	
 

  
    
 	

%
	


	$
&
&

.	


 &


* 7
7&


&
>
	
	&



&&

24D"%





%&




	
'
&
		&(



	

/ 7
  7&


   &
>
	  	  
%$

	  
  
G
  &  
    %"  




"	


%
%





%
.	


3 7  &
  

0&	
$
 


 %


 

(









%
%



.	


D 7.	





%%
	

"&

"



Case 19-34574-KRH Doc 258 Filed 11/26/19 Entered 11/26/19 11:47:30 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

H

?79#)779):?A!7 ;C#E9

@9)A.!78)<

  

     

7"
:$B):?1+4

C@8&B):?D1+

8?7.??#!9@)A!78

!

>9
7$


-3,9
:"	)





!%	B*,-

7
<1+/4111++

'<1+/4111,1

9%<
$I8&
A%

0&I8&
A%

		
	





	






&.//' +,



"

"




((
		



	
	"

	

&

"







*

#

	<HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH+,-

Nov 26 2019

/s/ Kevin R Huennekens

Entered on Docket: Nov 26 2019

Case 19-34574-KRH Doc 258 Filed 11/26/19 Entered 11/26/19 11:47:30 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
### §831dd. Liberal construction of chapter; sale of surplus lands

This chapter shall be liberally construed to carry out the purposes of Congress to provide for the disposition of and make needful rules and regulations respecting Government properties entrusted to the Authority, provide for the national defense, improve navigation, control destructive floods, and promote interstate commerce and the general welfare, but no real estate shall be held except what is necessary in the opinion of the Board to carry out plans and projects actually decided upon requiring the use of such land: Provided, That any land purchased by the Authority and not necessary to carry out plans and projects actually decided upon shall be sold by the Authority as agent of the United States, after due advertisement, at public auction to the highest bidder.

(May 18, 1933, ch. 32, §31, as added Aug. 31, 1935, ch. 836, §12, 49 Stat. 1080.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

As originally enacted, the last sentence of this section contained, at the end thereof, the words "or at private sale as provided in section 3 of this amendatory Act." Section 3 of the amendatory act of Aug. 31, 1935, added subsec. (k) to section 831c of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 685

 634

 641

 545

 540

 500

 502

 522

 549

 563

 553

 489

 435

 446

 474

 451

 455

 450

 463

 460

 443

 387

 357

 384

 420

 461

 477

 482

 494

 495

 368

 340

 324

 315

 313

 290

 294

 282

 281

 277

 271

 276

 301

 277

 272

 291

 308

 290

 254

 271

 273

 335

 307

 348

 387

 421

 463

 477

 478

 490

 510

 440

 452

 403

 401

 365

 379

 382

 379

 385

 405

 357

 378

 367

 357

 367

 379

 348

 340

 330

 314

 363

 337

 361

 403

 441

 470

 480

 486

 493

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:May 2, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 331

 288

 295

 265

 264

 242

 250

 252

 250

 254

 266

 237

 250

 243

 237

 243

 250

 231

 226

 220

 210

 240

 224

 239

 265

 289

 306

 313

 316

 321

TOTAL 11,872

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00036-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.M.E.

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009-PA-00043

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 2, 2014

DISMISSED

The trial court signed a final judgment on July 10, 2013. On January 14, 2014, appellant 

filed a notice of restricted appeal. A notice of restricted appeal must be filed within six months 

after the judgment is signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(c). Therefore, the notice of appeal was due 

to be filed on January 10, 2014, four days before appellant filed his notice of appeal. A motion for 

extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on January 27, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P.

26.3. Although appellant filed a notice of appeal within the fifteen-day grace period allowed by 

Rule 26.3, he did not file a motion for extension of time. 

A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good 

faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1 

but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of 
04-14-00036-CV

time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to 

Rule 26). However, the appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice 

of appeal in a timely manner. See id.; TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C). 

Therefore, on February 24, 2014, we ordered appellant to file, within fifteen days, a 

response presenting a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely 

manner. We explained that if appellant failed to respond within the time provided, the appeal 

would be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Appellant failed to respond. We therefore dismiss 

this appeal.

PER CURIAM

- 2 -
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated August
4, 1995 relating to the June 30, 1995 financial statements of Larson-Davis
incorporated, appearing in the annual report of Larson-Davis incorporated on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 1996, into the following registration
statements filed on behalf of Larson-Davis incorporated:  registration statement
on Form S-8, SEC File No. 33-35751, filed July 5, 1990; registration statement
on Form S-8, SEC File No. 33-44784, filed December 30, 1991; registration
statement on Form S-3, SEC No. 333-1505, effective as of March 22, 1996; and
registration statement on Form S-3, SEC No. 333-6527, effective as of August 2,
1996.


/s/ Pritchett, Siler & Hardy, P.C.


PRITCHETT, SILER & HARDY, P.C.

Salt Lake City, Utah
October 9, 1996
#### § 668.131 Definitions.

The following definitions apply to this subpart:

*Eligible noncitizen:* An individual possessing an immigration status that meets the requirements of § 668.33(a)(2).

*Immigration status:* The status conferred on a noncitizen under the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended, 8 U.S.C. 1182.

*Primary confirmation:* A process by which the Secretary, by means of a matching program conducted with the INS, compares the information contained in an Application for Federal Student Aid or a multiple data entry application regarding the immigration status of a noncitizen applicant for title IV, HEA assistance with records of that status maintained by the INS in its Alien Status Verification Index (ASVI) system for the purpose of determining whether a student's immigration status meets the requirements of § 668.33(a)(2) and reports the results of this comparison on an output document.

*Secondary confirmation:* A process by which the INS, in response to the submission of INS Document Verification Form G-845 by an institution, searches pertinent paper and automated INS files, other than the ASVI database, for the purpose of determining a student's immigration status and the validity of the submitted INS documents, and reports the results of this search to the institution.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1091)

[58 FR 3184, Jan. 7, 1993, as amended at 59 FR 12521, Mar. 16, 1994; 63 FR 40626, July 29, 1998]
MEMORANDUM

Date: October 27, 2015

Subject: Summary of October 27, 2015, call between Anadarko Petroleum and the

Environmental Protection Agency on the Federal Indian Country minor

NSR Rule and the proposed Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and

Natural Gas Activities

From: Greg Nizich, EPA/OAQPS/ AQPD / NSRG

To: EPA Docket ID: EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 20 14

- 0 606

I. PURPOSE

This memorandum summarizes an October 27, 2015, call between Greg Nizich of the

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Angela Zivkovitch of Anadarko Petroleum

. The

purpose of this call was to obtain clarification regarding an issue raised during a meeting with

American Petroleum Institute members at EPA’s Research Tr iangle Park office on October 22,

2015.

II. DATE

The call occurred at 3:40 pm EDT on October 27, 2015, at the Research Triangle Park,

NC, campus of the U

. S

. EPA.

III. SUMMARY OF DI SC USSION

Mr. Nizich and Ms. Zivkovitch discussed the activities listed in the Federal Indian Country

minor NSR rule’s definition of “begin construction” and how they relate to the timing of

activities that occur following a company’s authorization to begin drilling. Ms. Zivkovitch

clarified that the issue also involved the source registration deadline for oil and natural gas

sources subject to the proposed Indian Country minor NSR Federal Implementation Plan. Mr.

Nizich suggested that any submitted comments make that clear.
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Raser Technologies, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as
filed with the Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), we
Kraig Higginson, Chief Executive Officer and R. Thomas Bailey, Treasurer of
the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.

Dated: 5-14-04                              /s/ Kraig Higginson
      -----------------                    -------------------------------
                                           Kraig Higginson
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           and Director


Dated: 5-14 4                               /s/ R. Thomas Bailey
      -----------------                    -------------------------------
                                           R. Thomas Bailey
                                           Treasurer
                                           and Director
# Georgia Department of Natural Resources 2 Martin Luther King, Jr., Drive, S.E., Suite 1152 East, Atlanta, Georgia 30334 -4100 Mark Wi lliam s, Commissioner **Environmental Protection Division**

F. Allen Barnes, Director Phone: 404/656 -4713 FAX: 404/651 -5778 February 28, 2011 Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming Regional Administrator U.S. EPA, Region 4 61 Forsyth Street, S.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -3104 **RE:** Re- Submittal of t he Georgia State Implementation Plan Revisions fo r Transportation Conformity Dear Ms. Flemin g: On November 8, 2010, the Environmental Protection Division (EPD) requested that EPA take action to approve revisions to rules pertaining to Chapter 391 - 3 - 1 - .15 “Transportation Conformity.” T his letter is a re-submittal of the original November 8, 2010 request fo r approval to add the Transportation Conformity Interagency Consultation Manual, wh ich is cited by the rule, to the submittal. Georgia EPD is providing one paper copy as we ll as a compact disc of t he entire submittal including:  the original (N ovember 8, 2010) submittal;  the proposed rule revision showing the underlined addition to the rule;  the final copy of that revision, and  the Transportation Conformity Interagency Consultation Manual. Should you and your staff have questions, please contact me at (404) 363 -7014. Sincerely,

James P. Johnston Program Manager Planning & Support Program JPJ:klc
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5001 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 523
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5001

                          [Report No. 116-638]

  To amend the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to clarify that the 
 definition of a debt collector includes, in all cases, a person in a 
business the principal purpose of which is the enforcement of security 
                               interests.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 8, 2019

   Mr. Clay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

                           December 10, 2020

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed 
                               in italic]
    [For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on 
                           November 8, 2019]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to clarify that the 
 definition of a debt collector includes, in all cases, a person in a 
business the principal purpose of which is the enforcement of security 
                               interests.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Non-Judicial Foreclosure Debt 
Collection Clarification Act''.

SEC. 2. ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTERESTS.

     Section 803(6) of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (15 
U.S.C. 1692a(6)) is amended by striking ``For the purpose of section 
808(6), such term also includes any person who uses any instrumentality 
of interstate commerce or the mails in any business the principal 
purpose of which is the enforcement of security interests.''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 523

116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5001

                          [Report No. 116-638]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To amend the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to clarify that the 
 definition of a debt collector includes, in all cases, a person in a 
business the principal purpose of which is the enforcement of security 
                               interests.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 10, 2020

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
```
### Geology of the Christmas quadrangle, Gila and Pinal Counties, Arizona

By: Charles Ronald Willden

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1161E

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 528

 488

 461

 441

 514

 527

 517

 506

 506

 529

 503

 440

 471

 474

 438

 460

 463

 458

 465

 480

 501

 547

 649

 736

 734

 811

 797

 597

 596

 535

 523

 404

 434

 405

 409

 383

 420

 473

 458

 455

 455

 436

 427

 440

 366

 115

 271

 175

 372

 104

 178

 465

 500

 521

 653

 636

 675

 602

 557

 539

 489

 426

 476

 460

 434

 419

 424

 476

 493

 485

 479

 493

 457

 433

 454

 437

 303

 419

 399

 435

 416

 409

 488

 513

 586

 698

 674

 763

 710

 581

 569

 509

 469

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 11, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 310

 300

 284

 275

 278

 310

 321

 316

 312

 321

 298

 284

 297

 286

 203

 275

 263

 285

 273

 269

 318

 333

 378

 447

 433

 488

 455

 375

 368

 331

 306

TOTAL 15,361

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
**Exhibit 14.1**

 

**OPTA CORPORATION**

**CODE OF ETHICS FOR SENIOR OFFICERS**

 

It isthe policy of Opta Corporation (the “Company”) that its chief executiveofficer, chief financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller,and/or persons performing similar functions (the “Senior Officers”) observehigh standards of business and personal ethics in the conduct of their dutiesand responsibilities.  The SeniorOfficers must practice honesty and integrity in every aspect of dealing withother Company employees, the public, the business community, stockholders,customers, suppliers and government authorities.  The Senior Officers shall abide by this Codeof Ethics for Senior Officers (the “Code of Ethics”) and shall adhere to thefollowing ethical principles:

 

1.                                       Honestand Ethical Conduct.  Each SeniorOfficer shall act with honest and ethical conduct, including the ethicalhandling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal andprofessional relationships.

 

2.                                       Conflictsof Interest.  Each Senior Officershall avoid conflicts of interest and material transactions or relationshipsinvolving potential conflicts of interest without proper approval.  Senior Officers shall not receive benefitsfrom a person doing or seeking to do business with the Company which is not inthe best interests of the Company.

 

3.                                       Full,Fair, Accurate, Timely and Understandable Disclosure.  Each Senior Officer will make full, fair,accurate, timely and understandable disclosures in reports and documents thatthe Company files with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange Commissionand in other public communications made by the Company.

 

4.                                       Compliancewith Applicable Laws.  Each SeniorOfficer will comply with applicable governmental laws, rules andregulations.

 

5.                                       InternalReporting of Conflicts of Interest. Each Senior Officer will promptly report any material transaction orrelationship that reasonably could be expected to give rise to such a conflictto the Company’s Compliance Officer.  TheCompany’s Compliance Officer shall fully investigate and report to the Board ofDirectors any actual, potential or alleged violations of this Code of Ethics.

 

6.                                       Consequencesfor non-adherence to the Code of Ethics. Any violation of this Code of Ethics, whether or not material, may haverepercussions which could include termination of employment.

 

----
§ 668.73 Nature of financial charges or financial assistance. Misrepresentation concerning the nature of an eligible institution's financial charges, or the financial assistance provided includes, but is not limited to, false, erroneous, or misleading statements concerning— ( a ) Offers of scholarships to pay all or part of a course charge;
( b ) Whether a particular charge is the customary charge at the institution for a course;
( c ) The cost of the program and the institution's refund policy if the student does not complete the program;
( d ) The availability, amount, or nature of any financial assistance available to students from the institution or any other entity, including any government agency, to pay the costs of attendance at the institution, including part-time employment, housing, and transportation assistance;
( e ) A student's responsibility to repay any loans provided, regardless of whether the student is successful in completing the program and obtaining employment;
( f ) The student's right to reject any particular type of financial aid or other assistance, or whether the student must apply for a particular type of financial aid, such as financing offered by the institution; or
( g ) The amount, method, or timing of payment of tuition and fees that the student would be charged for the program.