alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 766

 698

 678

 721

 791

 849

 848

 867

 850

 735

 788

 670

 806

 811

 712

 806

 576

 781

 822

 759

 638

 523

 463

 424

 437

 445

 445

 451

 459

 472

 503

 462

 442

 423

 423

 422

 423

 421

 413

 405

 410

 395

 401

 410

 411

 417

 426

 422

 419

 426

 422

 422

 418

 339

 326

 339

 308

 291

 282

 314

 635

 525

 505

 488

 500

 516

 509

 503

 462

 454

 464

 444

 472

 500

 532

 505

 461

 538

 515

 516

 491

 451

 432

 405

 406

 415

 407

 407

 407

 429

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 408

 340

 328

 318

 325

 335

 331

 327

 302

 297

 303

 290

 308

 325

 345

 328

 301

 348

 334

 335

 319

 295

 283

 266

 267

 272

 268

 268

 268

 281

TOTAL 14,294

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 Project No.Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XXXVII
13738-000FFP Missouri 6, LLC
13761-000Solia 1 Hydroelectric, LLC
13770-000
 On March 24, 2011, the Commission held a drawing to determine priority among competing preliminary permit applications with identical filing times. In the event that the Commission concludes that none of the applicants' plans are better adapted than the others to develop, conserve, and utilize in the public interest the water resources of the region at issue, the priority established by this drawing will serve as the tiebreaker. Based on the drawing, the order of priority is as follows: Project No.1. FFP Missouri 6, LLC
13761-0002. Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XXXVII
13738-0003. Solia 1 Hydroelectric, LLC
13770-000
 Dated: March 25, 2011. Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., Deputy Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2011-7850 Filed 4-1-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### § 75.191 Consultation costs.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70322, Aug. 29, 2024.

An applicant may budget reasonable consultation fees or planning costs in connection with the development of curricula or instructional materials.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
EXHIBIT 32.1

BIODELIVERY SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark A. Sirgo, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark A. Sirgo                    
|Mark A. Sirgo                        
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|November 2, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5027 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5027

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
 Veterans Affairs to furnish free and comprehensive mental health care 
    to former members of the Armed Services, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 8, 2019

  Mr. Suozzi introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
 Veterans Affairs to furnish free and comprehensive mental health care 
    to former members of the Armed Services, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FREE AND COMPREHENSIVE MENTAL HEALTH CARE FOR VETERANS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1720I of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 1720I. Comprehensive mental health care for former members of 
              the Armed Forces
    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary shall furnish comprehensive mental 
health care at no cost to any former member of the Armed Forces.
    ``(b) Former Members of the Armed Forces.--In this section, the 
term `former member of the Armed Forces' includes the following:
            ``(1) A veteran described in section 101(2) of this title.
            ``(2) An individual not described in paragraph (1) who--
                    ``(A) served as a member of the Armed Forces, 
                including the reserve components thereof; and
                    ``(B) was discharged or released from such service 
                without regard to--
                            ``(i) the period of active duty service of 
                        the individual; or
                            ``(ii) the character of discharge or 
                        release of the individual.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 17 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking the 
item relating to section 1720I and inserting the following:

``1720I. Comprehensive mental health care for former members of the 
                            Armed Forces.''.
    (c) Expansion of Readjustment Counseling and Related Mental Health 
Services.--Section 1712A(a)(1)(C) of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new clause:
            ``(vi) Any former member of the Armed Forces described in 
        section 1720I(b) of this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JOHN ANTHONY GOMEZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-50599

D.C. No. 3:10-cr-02409-JAH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

John A. Houston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2011** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

John Anthony Gomez appeals from his guilty-plea convictions and 120-

month sentence for importation of marijuana and methamphetamine and aiding and

abetting in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960 and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Gomez’s counsel has filed a brief

FILED

DEC 23 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-50599

stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as

counsel of record. We have provided Gomez with the opportunity to file a pro se

supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief has been filed. Appellee has

filed a motion to dismiss.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We

dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d

1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).

However, the judgment does not conform to the oral pronouncement at

sentencing because it includes a non-standard condition of supervised release

which the district court did not include in the oral pronouncement. Because an

unambiguous oral pronouncement of sentence controls over a written judgment,

see United States v. Hicks, 997 F.2d 594, 597 (9th Cir. 1993), we remand for the

limited purposed of correcting the clerical error. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Appellee’s motion to dismiss

is DENIED AS MOOT.

DISMISSED; REMANDED.
- Newsroom        - Press Releases
      - Public Statements
      - Speeches
      - Testimony
      - Spotlight Topics
      - Media Gallery
      - Upcoming Events
      - Webcasts
      - What's New
      - SEC Videos
      - Reports and Publications
      - RSS Feeds
      - Social Media 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

**TIME AND DATE:** Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission Investor Advisory Committee will hold a telephonic meeting on Thursday, September 5, 2019. 

**PLACE:** The meeting will be open to the public *via* telephone at 1-800-260-0719 in the United States or (651) 291-1170 outside the United States, participant code 470756. 

**STATUS:** This meeting will begin at 11:00 a.m. (ET) and conclude at 12:30 p.m. and will be open to the public via telephone.  The meeting will be webcast by audio-only on the Commission’s website at www.sec.gov.

**MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:** On August 12, 2019, the Commission issued notice of the Committee meeting (Release No. 33-10670), indicating that the meeting is open to the public via telephone, and inviting the public to submit written comments to the Committee.  This Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a quorum of the Commission may attend the meeting.  

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:**  For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. 

Dated: August 26, 2019

Vanessa A. CountrymanSecretary
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 1 - 0 1245 SNPRM **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 1 - CE - 0 33 - AD Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### NO COMMENTS RECEIVED

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the fol lowing changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because

### Page 2 of 3

**For additional issues, double -**  **click here** 

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.:
**ASE Date** 

**Branch Manager Date**
§ 682.607 Payment of a refund or a return of title IV, HEA program funds to a lender upon a student's withdrawal. ( a ) *General.* By applying for a FFEL loan, a borrower authorizes the school to pay directly to the lender that portion of a refund or return of title IV, HEA program funds from the school that is allocable to the loan upon the borrower's withdrawal. A school— ( 1 ) Must pay that portion of the student's refund or return of title IV, HEA program funds that is allocable to a FFEL loan to— ( i ) The original lender; or
( ii ) A subsequent holder, if the loan has been transferred and the school knows the new holder's identity; and
( 2 ) Must provide simultaneous written notice to the borrower if the school makes a payment of a refund or a return of title IV, HEA program funds to a lender on behalf of that student.
( b ) *Allocation of a refund or returned title IV, HEA program funds.* In determining the portion of a refund or the return of title IV, HEA program funds upon a student's withdrawal for an academic period that is allocable to a FFEL loan received by the borrower for that academic period, the school must follow the procedures established in part 668 for allocating a refund or return of title IV, HEA program funds.
( c ) *Timely payment.* A school must pay a refund or a return of title IV, HEA program funds that is due in accordance with the timeframe in § 668.22(j).
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1077, 1078, 1078-1, 1078-2, 1082, 1094)
[64 FR 59043, Nov. 1, 1999]
### §81d. Addition of lands

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized, in his discretion, to acquire by purchase, donation, or otherwise, in behalf of the United States, such lands or interests in lands, easements, and buildings comprising the following: Glass House Point, in James City County; the area known as "The Hook", including the site of the action of October 3, 1781, in Gloucester County; and such additional lands as are desirable for the proper rounding out of the boundaries and for the administrative control of the Colonial National Historical Park: Provided, That the total acreage of lands to be added to the park, with the exception of parkways under the terms hereof shall not exceed seven hundred and fifty acres: Provided further, That the said acquisition of lands or improvements shall be made from such funds as may be appropriated pursuant to the authorization of section 81f of this title.

(June 28, 1938, ch. 775, §2, 52 Stat. 1209.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act July 3, 1930, ch. 837, 46 Stat. 855, which comprises this subchapter.
### §660. Carrier's funds derived from commerce; State prosecutions

Whoever, being a president, director, officer, or manager of any firm, association, or corporation engaged in commerce as a common carrier, or whoever, being an employee of such common carrier riding in or upon any railroad car, motortruck, steamboat, vessel, aircraft or other vehicle of such carrier moving in interstate commerce, embezzles, steals, abstracts, or willfully misapplies, or willfully permits to be misapplied, any of the moneys, funds, credits, securities, property, or assets of such firm, association, or corporation arising or accruing from, or used in, such commerce, in whole or in part, or willfully or knowingly converts the same to his own use or to the use of another, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

The offense shall be deemed to have been committed not only in the district where the violation first occurred but also in any district in which the defendant may have taken or had possession of such moneys, funds, credits, securities, property or assets.

A judgment of conviction or acquittal on the merits under the laws of any State shall be a bar to any prosecution hereunder for the same act or acts.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 730; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§409, 412 (Feb. 13, 1913, ch. 50, §1, 37 Stat. 670; Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, §9, 38 Stat. 733; Jan. 28, 1925, ch. 102, 43 Stat. 793; Jan. 21, 1933, ch. 16, 47 Stat. 773; July 24, 1946, ch. 606, 60 Stat. 656).

Section consolidates a portion of section 409 with section 412, both of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed. Other provisions of said section 409 are incorporated in sections 659 and 2117 of this title.

Definitive language in section 412 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., as to offense being a felony was deleted to conform with section 1 of this title. (See reviser's note under section 550 of this title.)

Words "imprisoned" was substituted for "confined in the penitentiary" in section 412 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., in view of power of Attorney General under section 4082 of this title.

Minimum punishment provision "less than one year nor" in section 412 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was omitted for reasons in reviser's note under section 203 of this title.

Maximum fine of $5,000 was substituted for minimum fine of $500 in section 412 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., as being more consonant with the scheme of penalties and offenses provided by Congress for most sections in this chapter.

Sentence in section 412 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., "Nothing in this section shall be held to take away or impair the jurisdiction of the several courts under the laws thereof;", was omitted in view of section 3231 of this title.

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000" in first par.
§ 367.51 How are allotments made? ( a ) For purposes of making grants under section 752(c) of the Act and this subpart, the Secretary makes an allotment to each State in an amount determined in accordance with section 752(i) of the Act.
( b ) The Secretary makes a grant to a DSA in the amount of the allotment to the State under section 752(i) of the Act if the DSA submits to and obtains approval from the Secretary of an application for assistance under this program that meets the requirements of section 752(h) of the Act and §§ 367.30 and 367.31.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0660) (Authority: Section 752(c)(2) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 796k(c)(2))
exv10w4



 








Exhibit 10.4



Summary of Verbal Amendments, effective July 1, 2007, to Employment Agreement between Registrant
and Dr. Katherine J. Turner



Effective July 1, 2007, Dr. Turner’s base salary was increased to $220,000 and the payout ranges
applicable Dr. Turner’s base salary under the Company’s variable pay program were amended to 20% at
threshold, 40% at target and 70% at stretch.
§ 668.192 Erroneous data appeals. ( a ) *Eligibility.* Except as provided in § 668.189(b), you may appeal the calculation of a cohort default rate upon which a loss of eligibility, under § 668.187, or provisional certification, under § 668.16(m), is based if— ( 1 ) You dispute the accuracy of data that you previously challenged on the basis of incorrect data, under § 668.185(b); or
( 2 ) A comparison of the loan record detail reports that we provide to you for the draft and official cohort default rates shows that the data have been newly included, excluded, or otherwise changed, and you dispute the accuracy of that data.
( b ) *Deadlines for submitting an appeal.* ( 1 ) You must send a request for verification of data errors to the relevant data manager, or data managers, and to us within 15 days after you receive the notice of your loss of eligibility or provisional certification. Your request must include a description of the information in the cohort default rate data that you believe is incorrect and all supporting documentation that demonstrates the error.
( 2 ) Within 20 days after receiving your request for verification of data errors, the data manager must send you and us a response that— ( i ) Addresses each of your allegations of error; and
( ii ) Includes the documentation used to support the data manager's position.
( 3 ) Within 15 days after receiving a guaranty agency's notice that we hold an FFELP loan about which you are inquiring, you must send us your request for verification of that loan's data errors. Your request must include a description of the information in the cohort default rate data that you believe is incorrect and all supporting documentation that demonstrates the error. We respond to your request under paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
( 4 ) Within 15 days after receiving incomplete or illegible records or data, you must send a request for replacement records or clarification of data to the data manager and us.
( 5 ) Within 20 days after receiving your request for replacement records or clarification of data, the data manager must— ( i ) Replace the missing or illegible records;
( ii ) Provide clarifying information; or
( iii ) Notify you and us that no clarifying information or additional or improved records are available.
( 6 ) You must send your completed appeal to us, including all supporting documentation— ( i ) Within 30 days after you receive the final data manager's response to your request; or
( ii ) If you are also requesting a new data adjustment or filing a loan servicing appeal, by the latest of the filing dates required in paragraph (b)(6)(i) of this section or in § 668.191(b)(6)(i) or § 668.193(c)(10)(i).
( c ) *Determination.* If we determine that incorrect data were used to calculate your cohort default rate, we recalculate your cohort default rate based on the correct data and electronically correct the rate that is publicly released.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1845-0022) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1082, 1085, 1094, 1099c)
[65 FR 65638, Nov. 1, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 55651, Oct. 28, 2009]
§ 76.708 When certain subgrantees may begin to obligate funds. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70339 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) If the authorizing statute for a program requires a State to make subgrants on the basis of a formula (see § 76.5), the State may not authorize an applicant for a subgrant to obligate funds until the later of the following two dates: ( 1 ) The date that the State may begin to obligate funds under § 76.703; or
( 2 ) The date that the applicant submits its application to the State in substantially approvable form.
( b ) Reimbursement for obligations under paragraph (a) of this section is subject to final approval of the application.
( c ) If the authorizing statute for a program gives the State discretion to select subgrantees, the State may not authorize an applicant for a subgrant to obligate funds until the subgrant is made. However, the State may approve pre-agreement costs in accordance with the cost principles in 2 CFR part 200, subpart E-Cost Principles.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3, 3474, and 6511(a))
[45 FR 22517, Apr. 3, 1980. Redesignated at 45 FR 77368, Nov. 21, 1980. Further redesignated at 60 FR 41295, Aug. 11, 1995; 79 FR 76094, Dec. 19, 2014]