alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §291. Purchase of claims for fees by court officials

Whoever, being a judge, clerk, or deputy clerk of any court of the United States or a Territory or Possession thereof, or a United States district attorney, assistant attorney, marshal, deputy marshal, magistrate judge, or other person holding any office or employment, or position of trust or profit under the United States, directly or indirectly purchases at less than the full face value thereof, any claim against the United States for the fee, mileage, or expenses of any witness, juror, deputy marshal, or any other officer of such court, shall be fined under this title.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 699; Pub. L. 90–578, title IV, §402(b)(2), Oct. 17, 1968, 82 Stat. 1118; Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §321, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5117; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §193 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §104, 35 Stat. 1107).

Word "Possession" was inserted to clarify scope of section.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Words "magistrate judge" substituted for "magistrate" in text pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as a note under section 631 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure. Previously, "magistrate" substituted for "commissioner" pursuant to Pub. L. 90–578. See chapter 43 (§631 et seq.) of Title 28.
Creditor Type scheduled claimed Allowed Priority 

Employee wages 507(a)(4) 0 28,000 28,000

Employee Benefits (Anthem) 507(a)(5) 26,571 28,153

Employee Benefits (United Health Care) 89,254

IRS Priority 507(8)(C ) 692,610 617,765.60 617,765

Henrico Cty (property) 507(a)(8)(B) 3,333 7,591.46 7591.46

Henrico Cty (Bus Lic) 507(a)(8)(A) 3,735.10 3735

City of VB (Bus Lic) 507(a)(8)(A) 9,012 9012

City of VB 507(a)(8)(A)

City of Ches. (Bus lic) 507(a)(8)(A) 10,294 10,813.17 10813

VEC Unemployment 507(a)(8) 39,164 39,164 39164

Va Dept of Tax (WH) 507(a)(8) 88,851 80,610 88851

Unsecured 28,558

IRS Secured 219,272 189,070

DMAS 66,239 66,956.05

Direct Capital Secured 31,604 28,718.31

M&M Auto Secured 3,870

On Deck Secured* 40,269 40,266

Kabbage Secured* 19,885 15,384.37

SPG Advance Secured* 53,501

Knight Capital Secured* 57,500 60,357.91

ADP 4,686

Paychex 4,041

AF Byrd 10,090

Anthem, Inc. 6,656

AT&T 5,245

Christian & Barton 22,023 22,757.81

25,740 29,446.64

Hogge Law 15,303 16,291.45

Crowgey & Associates 1,971 2,183.37

The Hartford 2,397

2,740 2,739.50

E-Fax 432

Lauris Online 5,679

Central Reach 13,022

Pitney Bowes 4,041

Relias Learning 4,390

Shred-It x7575 4,082

Staples, Inc. 6,932

14,184

The Nesbitt Law Firm 12,092

Tierpoint 7,267

 Wilson Law Group 835

Windstream x0174 127,261

Parker, Pollard, Wilton & Peaden

Hirschler Fleischer Attorneys

Stewart Financial Services

Case 19-34993-KRH Doc 175-5 Filed 12/11/20 Entered 12/11/20 18:51:35 Desc Ex

E Page 1 of 4
Windstream x2149

SafeCo Inc. 12,523

Parker Pollard 25,740

Porter Realty 12,969

Ballantine Manor 8,676 6,552.82

Miller Mechanical 3,626

Atlantic Constructors 2,900 7,905.91

The Flying Locksmiths 1,094

Patient First 967

IRS Gen. Unsecured 265,913

Capital One 233.69

Jackson Lewis 36,485 37,019

Verizon 8,460

AmTrust 6,657 13,276.05

Accident Fund 19,717

Case 19-34993-KRH Doc 175-5 Filed 12/11/20 Entered 12/11/20 18:51:35 Desc Ex

E Page 2 of 4
Allowed as Secured

189070

0

28718.31

3870

Case 19-34993-KRH Doc 175-5 Filed 12/11/20 Entered 12/11/20 18:51:35 Desc Ex

E Page 3 of 4
Case 19-34993-KRH Doc 175-5 Filed 12/11/20 Entered 12/11/20 18:51:35 Desc Ex

E Page 4 of 4
Working Draft EPA's NPDES Pesticides General Permit

Andrews, Jeff 

to: 

Jack Faulk 

01/29/2010 10:20 AM 

Cc: 

"Spanos, Stergios", "Smagula, Amy" 

Show Details 

Jack, I know this is late but since Amy Smagula and I read the draft I figured I’d send these comments to you 

anyway. In general the draft seems like it would work to address the court’s mandate and still be workable at the 

state level since it would mainly target the largest pesticide users.

Here are our comments:

1. Page 2, part 1.1.2.2. Please reconsider making ORW ineligible. I can envision situations where it may be 

necessary to control pests in these waters. Since any discharge would be temporary it may be acceptable.

2. Page 2, part 1.2.2. Although it is clear after further reading, when I read this section the first time it seemed 

to indicate that the table of usage thresholds only applied to the last bullet on page 4 which reads “Any 

other entity ...” 

3. Page 15, part 3.0, second paragraph. If an application of aquatic plant herbicides results in a nutrient 

release that causes an algae bloom would this be considered a violation that would require corrective 

actions? 

4. Page 16. part 4.2, last paragraph. What if your target is, say, variable milfoil? If you treat with 2,4-D and 

you see some impacts to non target species, would this be a problem, even if the label of the product says 

that those species may be impacted, when your stated target is variable milfoil? Exactly what would this 

mean? 

5. Page 18, part 5.1.2. Consider adding a new item g. requiring the applicator to list any impairments. 

6. Page 21, part 6.2. Consider requiring an explanation of why the changes to the control measures couldn’t 

be made and capping the time to do this to say 60 days. 

7. Page 22, part 6.3.2. Since the definition of “adverse incidents” include effects on people, consider adding 

the number of people, ages ... to the list of info that must be included in the report. 

8. Page 24, part 7.0, last paragraph. Consider requiring that applicants send in the annual report or a single 

page of it when they don’t apply pesticides for the year. How else will EPA know if they are failing to submit 

the reports when they are required? Also, in the last sentence consider revising the phrase “Once a 

permittee meets the obligation to submit ...” to say “Once a permittee meets the threshold requiring the 

submittal of ...” 

9. Page 24, part 8.2. It could be difficult to include all of the listed information in a single pest management 

log. Does all the info really need to be in the log? 

Thanks for the opportunity to comment.

Please call if you have any questions.

Thanks, Jeff

Jeffrey G. Andrews, P.E.

Sanitary Engineer

Wastewater Engineering Bureau

NH Department of Environmental Services

Tel: (603) 271-2984

Fax: (603) 271-4128

E-mail: Jeff.Andrews@des.nh.gov

 

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\jfaulk\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web0875.htm 5/11/2010
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 3,799

 3,956

 4,237

 4,506

 4,534

 4,590

 4,348

 4,184

 4,270

 4,146

 4,313

 4,770

 4,918

 4,747

 4,617

 4,718

 4,990

 4,975

 12,660

 14,801

 14,485

 14,328

 13,949

 13,983

 14,098

 14,756

 15,098

 16,472

 16,385

 16,292

 1,702

 1,638

 1,886

 2,064

 2,308

 2,211

 2,104

 2,176

 2,162

 2,268

 2,311

 2,166

 2,610

 2,568

 2,486

 2,179

 1,885

 1,879

 2,368

 7,056

 8,067

 7,842

 7,437

 7,007

 7,295

 6,899

 6,965

 7,057

 6,409

 6,654

 2,377

 2,735

 2,915

 3,096

 3,234

 3,186

 3,181

 3,306

 3,171

 3,170

 3,223

 3,435

 3,545

 3,592

 3,535

 3,539

 3,603

 3,456

 7,093

 10,873

 11,198

 10,698

 10,439

 10,426

 10,433

 10,220

 10,679

 10,831

 11,103

 11,189

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 1, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> OPUR1
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000048732
<NAME> HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                 PRO-FORMA
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    9,664,110
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  3,908,631
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,669,171
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     3,896,610
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,138,522
<COMMON>                                     2,916,662
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          1,395,466
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               4,312,128
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      9,740
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         7,142,980
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      452,500
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>               1,360,239
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  397,454
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               5,463,481
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               19,138,522
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                   11,488,464
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                          (30,432)
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  10,011,076
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  10,011,076
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                      1,477,388
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                         (1,110,110)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 368,278
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       538,802
<NET-INCOME>                                 (141,092)
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        390
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                (141,482)
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       426,492
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      342,471
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                       1,425,359
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.50)
        

</TABLE>
### Geology and ground water in Verde Valley - The Mogollon Rim region, Arizona

By: F. R. TwenterD.G. Metzger

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1177

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (16679 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (9081 pdf)                        
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean TDS

1 212 203 208 145

2 213 208 211 146

3 207 196 200 140

4 239 174 200 140

5 240 230 236 162

6 230 214 220 152

7 218 198 211 146

8 305 192 237 162

9 305 292 299 201

10 294 155 224 154

11 152 113 138 101

12 137 106 122 91

13 137 114 125 93

14 168 126 155 112

15 211 150 186 131

16 169 125 151 109

17 134 93 116 88

18 128 89 108 83

19 129 100 115 87

20 99 87 92 73

21 108 98 105 81

22 107 82 90 72

23 92 78 84 68

24 88 78 83 67

25 90 79 88 70

26 94 86 90 72

27 103 93 98 77

28 101 86 95 75

29 103 86 94 74

30 92 82 88 70

Total 4469

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Check 21 

Period: April 2023 Run Date: 5/9/2023
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5154 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include geothermal energy 

in the 30 percent energy credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 19, 2019 

Mr. HORSFORD (for himself, Mr. HIGGINS of New York, Ms. SA ́NCHEZ, Mr. 

SUOZZI, Mr. BEYER, Mr. PANETTA, Ms. DELBENE, Mr. BLUMENAUER, 

and Ms. MOORE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include 

geothermal energy in the 30 percent energy credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Geothermal Energy 

5 Opportunity Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘GEO Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF GEOTHERMAL IN 30 PERCENT EN7 ERGY CREDIT. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 48(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) of the 

9 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 are each amended by 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5154 IH

1 striking ‘‘paragraph (3)(A)(i)’’ and inserting ‘‘clause (i) 

2 or (iii) of paragraph (3)(A)’’. 

3 (b) PHASEOUT.—Section 48(a) of such Code is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following new para5 graph: 

6 ‘‘(8) PHASEOUT FOR GEOTHERMAL.— 

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subpara8 graph (B), in the case of any energy property 

9 described in paragraph (3)(A)(iii) the construc10 tion of which begins before January 1, 2027, 

11 the energy percentage determined under para12 graph (2) shall be equal to— 

13 ‘‘(i) in the case of any property the 

14 construction of which begins after Decem15 ber 31, 2024, and before January 1, 2026, 

16 26 percent, and 

17 ‘‘(ii) in the case of any property the 

18 construction of which begins after Decem19 ber 31, 2025, and before January 1, 2027, 

20 22 percent. 

21 ‘‘(B) PLACED IN SERVICE DEADLINE.—In 

22 the case of any energy property described in 

23 paragraph (3)(A)(iii) the construction of which 

24 begins before January 1, 2027, and which is 

25 not placed in service before January 1, 2029, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5154 IH

1 the energy percentage determined under para2 graph (2) shall be equal to 10 percent.’’. 

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply to periods after December 31, 

5 2019, under rules similar to the rules of section 48(m) 

6 as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment 

7 of the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1990. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
1 

### Brown, Kelly
Subject: FW: Ozone comments for planned meeting with Janet M cCabe

From: kellferg@gmail.com [ mailto:kellferg@gmail.com ] On Behalf Of Kelly Ferguson Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 3:42 PM To: Sasser, Erika Cc: Stone, Susan Subject: Re: Ozone comments for planned meeting with Janet McCabe


### Hi Erika, That's great news--I'm happy to hear that you will be in on the conversation. Looking forwar d to talking with you as well.
Kelly
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Sasser, Erika < Sasser.Erika@epa.gov > wrote:
Hello Kelly—

Thank you for your comments on the ozone proposal. We were aware of your upcoming meeting with Janet McCabe on May 4, and we were planning to participate in th at briefing, so there is no need to schedule a sepa rate time. We will be glad to hear your thoughts on the proposal. Susan will make sure all the materials are reflec ted in the docket as well.

Thanks for reaching out, and we look forward to tal king with you on May 4.

Erika

_________________ Erika N. Sasser, Ph.D.
Director, Health and Environmental Impacts Division
Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards, U.S. EP A

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, MD C504-02, RTP, NC 27711
(919) 541-3889 sasser.erika@epa.gov2 From: kellferg@gmail.com [mailto: kellferg@gmail.com ] On Behalf Of Kelly Ferguson Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 12:40 PM To: Sasser, Erika Cc: Stone, Susan Subject: Ozone comments for planned meeting with Janet McCa be

Hi Dr. Sasser--

My name is Kelly Ferguson and I'm a member of the D etroit Reproductive Advocacy Matters (DREAM) team i nvolved in the Reach the Decision Makers Program . Our group is interested in advocating for pregnan t women residing in sensitive or vulnerable communi ties who are exposed to multiple factors that put them at in creased risk of effects of air pollutant exposure. We have recently submitted comments in response to the proposed ozone rule (see attached), and are planning a trip to meet with Janet McCabe on May 4 to discuss them.

We are particularly interested in including pregnan t women and communities exposed to multiple risk fa ctors simultaneously in the finalized federal register, and because of their om ission in the HREA and ISA processes we support the lower range (60-65ppm) of the proposed standard. I've attached "one-pagers' summa rizing our arguments and the state of the science t o support them.

I've spoken with Susan Stone about our meeting with Janet, and just wanted to let you know about it as well since you play such an integral role in this process. If you would be interested in talking on the phone to discuss our comments my te am would welcome that opportunity.

Best wishes--

Kelly Ferguson



### -- Kelly K. Ferguson, PhD

Research Fellow
Department of Environmental Health Sciences
University of Michigan School of Public Health
Exhibit 23(b)






                          Independent Auditors' Consent


                  We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the Registration
Statements  of  Cavalier  Homes,  Inc.  (Form S-8  Registration  Nos.  33-20842,
33-20859, 33-86232, 33-86236,  333-06371,  333-04953,  333-19833,  333-45255 and
Form S-3 Registration Nos. 33-62487,  33-63060, 33-86348,  333-18213,  333-00607
and 333-48111,  as amended) of our report dated February 21, 1997,  with respect
to the consolidated  balance sheet of Belmont Homes, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December  31,  1996  and  the  related   consolidated   statements   of  income,
shareholders'  equity and cash flows for the years ended  December  31, 1996 and
1995, which report appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10K of
Cavalier Homes, Inc.

/s/  KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
------------------------------
KPMG Peat Marwick, LLP
Jackson, Mississippi

March 27, 1998
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 345

 351

 401

 441

 440

 455

 428

 416

 424

 463

 508

 527

 529

 470

 417

 414

 372

 372

 421

 384

 363

 340

 341

 344

 357

 374

 350

 368

 277

 282

 278

 285

 287

 284

 294

 304

 285

 302

 305

 291

 283

 283

 283

 277

 278

 265

 266

 264

 241

 238

 229

 257

 287

 286

 279

 270

 296

 302

 318

 326

 332

 329

 334

 334

 342

 328

 345

 334

 329

 322

 321

 317

 316

 310

 318

 311

 298

 294

 286

 296

 317

 320

 307

 300

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:March 30, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 199

 203

 213

 217

 221

 219

 222

 222

 227

 219

 229

 222

 219

 215

 214

 212

 211

 208

 213

 208

 200

 198

 193

 199

 212

 214

 206

 201

TOTAL 8,882

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
Exhibit 23.1

 

We have issued our report dated January 28, 2004 accompanying the consolidated financial statements of VitalStream Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this "Form 10-K"). We hereby consent to inclusion of said report in the Form 10-K and the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of VitalStream Holdings, Inc. on Form S-8, File No. 333-82218. 

 

 

ROSE, SNYDER & JACOBS 

Encino, CA
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 708

 638

 609

 606

 594

 608

 657

 637

 681

 618

 702

 679

 705

 712

 634

 713

 643

 613

 566

 530

 650

 682

 696

 704

 734

 676

 595

 556

 496

 429

 516

 477

 448

 427

 419

 414

 418

 419

 416

 461

 456

 471

 500

 512

 523

 122

 376

 489

 466

 462

 485

 489

 491

 492

 429

 399

 394

 389

 377

 360

 584

 532

 528

 497

 482

 484

 500

 523

 511

 537

 579

 582

 600

 598

 572

 497

 541

 540

 506

 501

 550

 538

 546

 543

 502

 467

 442

 428

 406

 386

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:May 5, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 377

 345

 342

 323

 314

 315

 325

 339

 332

 348

 374

 376

 387

 386

 369

 323

 350

 350

 329

 326

 356

 348

 353

 352

 326

 305

 289

 281

 267

 255

TOTAL 15,502

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 776

 770

 761

 811

 858

 938

 917

 845

 814

 802

 811

 842

 874

 906

 897

 894

 913

 922

 912

 901

 935

 974

 1,022

 1,037

 999

 703

 670

 674

 689

 684

 761

 754

 751

 756

 819

 859

 842

 814

 796

 796

 793

 811

 840

 873

 887

 880

 887

 908

 895

 891

 900

 892

 819

 939

 712

 639

 642

 642

 659

 660

 768

 761

 755

 775

 838

 904

 864

 827

 802

 799

 802

 825

 855

 887

 891

 886

 900

 914

 904

 897

 913

 941

 962

 984

 894

 665

 657

 661

 672

 671

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 1, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 491

 486

 483

 495

 534

 575

 550

 527

 512

 510

 512

 526

 544

 564

 567

 564

 572

 581

 575

 570

 580

 598

 611

 624

 568

 427

 422

 424

 431

 431

TOTAL 24,874

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean TDS

1 442 428 435 285

2 446 431 439 287

3 467 440 457 298

4 471 458 465 303

5 480 467 474 309

6 486 477 482 314

7 481 456 469 306

8 469 452 461 301

9 472 452 462 302

10 495 455 479 312

11 499 475 488 318

12 502 489 496 323

13 505 469 480 313

14 480 472 477 311

15 471 462 468 305

16 470 464 467 305

17 489 465 483 314

18 494 479 489 318

19 497 475 488 318

20 496 462 481 313

21 483 466 474 309

22 487 475 479 312

23 490 476 483 314

24 483 475 479 312

25 488 474 480 313

26 487 477 483 314

27 485 479 481 313

28 492 479 485 316

29 489 474 481 313

30 489 477 484 315

Total 14249

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Check 20 

Period: September 2022 Run Date: 11/22/2022