alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit32.4

 

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Idaho Power Company (the "Company") on Form 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2008, (the "Report"), I, Darrel T. Anderson,Senior Vice President - Administrative Services and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify that:

 

(1)              The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| */s/Darrel T. Anderson*                         |
|-------------------------------------------------|
| Darrel T. Anderson                              |
| Senior Vice President - Administrative Services |
| and Chief Financial Officer                     |
| February 26, 2009                               |
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

LARRY JOSEPH PRINCE, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 17-0643 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR 2011-007328-004

The Honorable Rosa Mroz, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Diane Meloche

Counsel for Respondent

Larry Joseph Prince, Florence

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Michael J. Brown, Judge Maria Elena Cruz, and Judge 

David D. Weinzweig delivered the decision of the Court.

FILED 5-15-2018
STATE v. PRINCE

Decision of the Court

2

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Larry Joseph Prince seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant 

to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner’s third

successive petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to 

show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) 

(petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion. 

¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review and deny relief.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 11,869

 11,576

 11,735

 12,612

 6,272

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2,587

 2,902

 3,197

 3,306

 4,885

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 6,972

 7,063

 7,043

 7,623

 5,579

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 20, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### Mary Finney, Respondent, v. Title Guarantee and Trust Company, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Ho opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
#### Mary Carpink, Appellant-Respondent, v. Fred Karpink, Defendant. Peter A. Lauria, Respondent-Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Mary Carpink, Appellant-Respondent, v. Fred Karpink, Defendant. Peter A. Lauria, Respondent-Appellant. (Action No. 2.)

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.; Untermyer, J., dissents and votes to affirm. Settle order on notice.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 714

 678

 677

 678

 674

 682

 671

 662

 649

 640

 629

 623

 623

 616

 621

 629

 626

 629

 629

 627

 634

 636

 637

 643

 650

 651

 650

 653

 651

 655

 665

 658

 662

 654

 651

 649

 642

 634

 625

 623

 615

 613

 611

 607

 605

 603

 608

 602

 608

 614

 616

 594

 630

 633

 636

 638

 642

 644

 638

 638

 677

 668

 667

 662

 661

 660

 653

 644

 633

 629

 620

 615

 616

 612

 609

 609

 614

 612

 615

 619

 621

 628

 633

 637

 641

 644

 645

 648

 645

 645

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:October 5, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 434

 429

 428

 425

 424

 424

 420

 414

 407

 405

 399

 396

 397

 394

 392

 392

 395

 394

 396

 399

 400

 404

 407

 410

 412

 414

 415

 416

 415

 415

TOTAL 19,082

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 64 (Monday, April 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 18578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7865]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLCAN01000.L10200000.XZ0000]


Notice of Public Meeting: Northwest California Resource Advisory 
Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
of 1976 (FLPMA), and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), 
the U. S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) 
Northwest California Resource Advisory Council will meet as indicated 
below.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday and Friday, April 28 and 29, 
2011, Lake and Mendocino counties, California. On April 28, the RAC 
convenes at 8:30 a.m. at the BLM Ukiah Field Office, 2550 North State 
Street, Ukiah, and departs immediately for a field tour to the Indian 
Valley Management Area in Lake County. Members of the public are 
welcome. They must provide their own transportation, beverages and 
food. On April 29, the council convenes at 8 a.m. in the conference 
room of the BLM Ukiah Field office. Time for public comment has been 
reserved for 11 a.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Haug, BLM Northern California 
District manager, (530) 224-2160; or BLM Public Affairs Officer Joseph 
J. Fontana, (530) 252-5332.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 12-member council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior, through the BLM, on a variety of planning and 
management issues associated with public land management in Northwest 
California. At this meeting agenda topics include discussion of 
alternative energy projects, management of the Sacramento River Bend 
area in Shasta County, off-highway vehicle management grants, and land 
tenure topics in the BLM Arcata, Redding and Ukiah field offices. All 
meetings are open to the public. Members of the public may present 
written comments to the council. Each formal council meeting will have 
time allocated for public comments. Depending on the number of persons 
wishing to speak, and the time available, the time for individual 
comments may be limited. Members of the public are welcome on field 
tours, but they must provide their own transportation and food. 
Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation and other reasonable accommodations, 
should contact the BLM as provided above.

    Dated: March 21, 2011.
Joseph J. Fontana,
Public Affairs Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-7865 Filed 4-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Pacific Aerospace & Electronics, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-3 (Nos. 333-58148, 333-56884, 333-44686 and 333-35382) on Form S-8 (Nos.
333-36676, 333-66469, 333-39799 and 333-29007) on Form S-1 (No. 333-66471) and
on Form SB-2 (No. 333-05011) of Pacific Aerospace & Electronics, Inc. of our
report dated August 23, 2002, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Pacific Aerospace & Electronics, Inc. as of May 31, 2001 and 2002, and the
related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss),
stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended May 31, 2002, which report appears in the May 31, 2002,
annual report on Form 10-K, as amended, of Pacific Aerospace & Electronics, Inc.

Our report dated August 23, 2002, refers to a change in the method of accounting
for goodwill and other intangible assets in the year ended May 31, 2002 and also
contains an explanatory paragraph that states that Pacific Aerospace &
Electronics, Inc. has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net
capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as
a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.


                                                        /s/ KPMG LLP

Seattle, Washington
November 14, 2002
### §3437. Severance—(Rule)

#### See Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

Relief from prejudicial joinder of defendants or offenses, Rule 14.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 832.)
----

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of Texen Oil & Gas, Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"),I, Michael Sims, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company. 

Dated this 15th day of November, 2004. 

|   | /s/ Michael    Sims                                    |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Michael    Sims                                        |
|   | Chief    Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                                                   |

----
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF C.F.O. PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Patrick B. Fox, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Datrek Miller International, Inc.

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(d)) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and 

 

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

June 15, 2005
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-6425, 33-14984,33-33602, 33-42345, 33-69650, 33-58515, 33-64901, 333-15641, 333-39151, 333-43969, 333-46187, 333-53793, 333-57381, 333-73159, 333-75241, 333-84095, 333-33888, 333-57990, 333-62320 and 333-104943), on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-45541 and333-62128) and on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-82695) of SunGard Data Systems Inc. of our report dated February 12, 2004 relating to the financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Stockholders, which is incorporated in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 11, 2004
#### § 370.42 What access must the CAP be afforded to policymaking and administrative personnel?

The CAP must be afforded reasonable access to policymaking and administrative personnel in State and local rehabilitation programs, projects, and community rehabilitation programs. One way in which the CAP may be provided that access would be to include the director of the designated agency among the individuals to be consulted on matters of general policy development and implementation, as required by section 101(a)(16) of the Act.

(Authority: Sections 12(c), 101(a)(16), and 112(g)(2) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c), 721(a)(16), and 732(g)(2))
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**PERIODIC REPORTCERTIFICATIONof the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

 

I, Manouch Moshayedi, ChiefExecutive Officer of SimpleTech, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to my knowledge:

 

(1) the Quarterly Report of theCompany on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending  March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ MANOUCH  MOSHAYEDI   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |
| Manouch  Moshayedi       |
| Chief  Executive Officer |
| May 12, 2003             |

 

I, Dan Moses, Chief FinancialOfficer of SimpleTech, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tomy knowledge:

 

(1) the Quarterly Report of theCompany on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2003, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2) the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ DAN  MOSES           |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |
| Dan Moses                |
| Chief  Financial Officer |
| May 12, 2003             |

 

----
### §3195. Payment of fees and costs

All costs or expenses incurred in any extradition proceeding in apprehending, securing, and transmitting a fugitive shall be paid by the demanding authority.

All witness fees and costs of every nature in cases of international extradition, including the fees of the magistrate judge, shall be certified by the judge or magistrate judge before whom the hearing shall take place to the Secretary of State of the United States, and the same shall be paid out of appropriations to defray the expenses of the judiciary or the Department of Justice as the case may be.

The Attorney General shall certify to the Secretary of State the amounts to be paid to the United States on account of said fees and costs in extradition cases by the foreign government requesting the extradition, and the Secretary of State shall cause said amounts to be collected and transmitted to the Attorney General for deposit in the Treasury of the United States.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 825; Pub. L. 90–578, title III, §301(a)(3), Oct. 17, 1968, 82 Stat. 1115; Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §321, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5117.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§662, 662c, 662d, 668 (R.S. §5278; Aug. 3, 1882, ch. 378, §4, 22 Stat. 216; June 28, 1902, ch. 1301, §1, 32 Stat. 475; Mar. 22, 1934, ch. 73, §§2, 3, 48 Stat. 455).

First paragraph of this section consolidates provisions as to costs and expenses from said sections 662, 662c, and 662d.

Minor changes were made in phraseology and surplusage was omitted.

Remaining provisions of said sections 662, 662c, and 662d of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., are incorporated in sections 752, 3182, 3183, and 3187 of this title.

The words "or the Department of Justice as the case may be" were added at the end of the second paragraph in conformity with the appropriation acts of recent years. See for example act July 5, 1946, ch. 541, title II, 60 Stat. 460.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1968—Pub. L. 90–578 substituted "magistrate" for "commissioner" in two places.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Words "magistrate judge" substituted for "magistrate" wherever appearing in text pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as a note under section 631 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### Effective Date of 1968 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 90–578 effective Oct. 17, 1968, except when a later effective date is applicable, which is the earlier of a date when implementation of amendment by appointment of magistrates [now United States magistrate judges] and assumption of office takes place or third anniversary of enactment of Pub. L. 90–578 on Oct. 17, 1968, see section 403 of Pub. L. 90–578, set out as a note under section 631 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
§ 106.3 Remedial and affirmative action and self-evaluation. ( a ) *Remedial action.* If the Assistant Secretary finds that a recipient has discriminated against persons on the basis of sex in an education program or activity under this part, or otherwise violated this part, such recipient must take such remedial action as the Assistant Secretary deems necessary to remedy the violation, consistent with 20 U.S.C. 1682.
( b ) *Affirmative action.* In the absence of a finding of discrimination on the basis of sex in an education program or activity, a recipient may take affirmative action to overcome the effects of conditions which resulted in limited participation therein by persons of a particular sex. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to alter any affirmative action obligations which a recipient may have under Executive Order 11246.
[45 FR 30955, May 9, 1980, as amended at 85 FR 30572, 30579, May 19, 2020; 89 FR 33885, Apr. 29, 2024]
<PAGE>
 
                                 EXHIBIT 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


  We consent to the incorporation by reference into the Company's Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-6425, 33-14984, 33-33602, 33-42345,
33-69650, 33-58515, 33-64901, 333-15641, 333-39151, 333-43969, 333-46187, 333-
53793, 333-57381 and 333-73159) and Registration Statements  on  Form S-3 (333-
45541, 333-59129 and 333-65831) of our report dated  February  11, 1999, except
as to subsequent events information presented in Note 2, for which the date is
March 1, 1999, on our audits of the  consolidated financial statements of
SunGard Data Systems Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, which
report on the consolidated financial statements is incorporated by reference in
this Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOPPERS LLP

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


2400 Eleven Penn Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 30, 1999
#### § 106.35 Access to institutions of vocational education.

A recipient shall not, on the basis of sex, exclude any person from admission to any institution of vocational education operated by that recipient.

[71 FR 62543, Oct. 25, 2006, as amended at 85 FR 30579, May 19, 2020]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 379

 363

 330

 309

 344

 367

 370

 475

 412

 325

 309

 307

 371

 346

 313

 320

 321

 343

 377

 371

 349

 326

 296

 279

 317

 383

 396

 349

 354

 324

 325

 315

 290

 281

 265

 269

 273

 277

 280

 285

 277

 276

 275

 280

 274

 267

 268

 262

 261

 267

 259

 254

 254

 255

 253

 259

 261

 253

 263

 266

 266

 259

 330

 319

 294

 278

 284

 292

 297

 326

 314

 290

 287

 286

 306

 298

 283

 278

 277

 277

 286

 279

 270

 272

 270

 263

 271

 286

 288

 282

 285

 283

 273

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 2, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 220

 213

 198

 188

 192

 196

 200

 217

 210

 195

 193

 193

 205

 200

 191

 188

 187

 187

 193

 188

 183

 184

 183

 179

 183

 193

 194

 190

 192

 191

 185

TOTAL 8,924

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
#### § 668.29 Severability.

If any provision of this subpart or its application to any person, act, or practice is held invalid, the remainder of the subpart or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or practice shall not be affected thereby.

[84 FR 58932, Nov. 1, 2019]