alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Advisory Council for the Elimination of Tuberculosis, Department of Health and Human Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period through March 15, 2013.

For information, contact Hazel Dean, Sc.D., M.P.H., Designated Federal Officer, Advisory Council for the Elimination of Tuberculosis, Department of Health and Human Services, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop E-10, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, telephone 404/639-8000 or fax 404/639-8600.

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management  activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the  Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                

Dated: March 25, 2011.

Andre Tyler,

Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2011-7754 Filed 3-31-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
```

[114th Congress Public Law 238]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 972]]

Public Law 114-238
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to certain grant 
   assurances, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Oct. 7, 2016 -  [H.R. 
                                5944]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. GRANT ASSURANCES.

    Section 47107 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(t) Renewal of Certain Leases.--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding subsection (a)(13), an 
        airport owner or operator who renews a covered lease shall not 
        be treated as violating a written assurance requirement under 
        this section as a result of such renewal.
            ``(2) Covered lease defined.--In this subsection, the term 
        `covered lease' means a lease--
                    ``(A) originally entered into before the date of 
                enactment of this subsection;
                    ``(B) under which a nominal lease rate is provided;
                    ``(C) under which the lessee is a Federal or State 
                government entity; and
                    ``(D) that supports the operation of military 
                aircraft by the Air Force or Air National Guard--
                          ``(i) at the airport; or
                          ``(ii) remotely from the airport.''.

    Approved October 7, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5944:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            Sept. 20, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
### §5007. Cooperation with other agencies

#### (a) In general

Any agency of the Federal Government is authorized, upon request of the Commission, to cooperate in the conduct of scientific and other programs, and to furnish, on a reimbursable basis, facilities and personnel for the purpose of assisting the Commission in carrying out its duties under the Convention. Such agency may accept reimbursement from the Commission.

#### (b) Functions of Secretary of Commerce

In carrying out the provisions of the Convention and this chapter, the Secretary of Commerce may arrange for cooperation with agencies of the United States, the States, private institutions and organizations, and agencies of the government of any Party, to conduct scientific and other programs, and may execute such memoranda as may be necessary to reflect such agreements.

(Pub. L. 102–567, title VIII, §808, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4312; Pub. L. 102–587, title VIII, §8008, Nov. 4, 1992, 106 Stat. 5101; Pub. L. 106–562, title III, §304(a), Dec. 23, 2000, 114 Stat. 2806.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Title VIII of Pub. L. 102–567 and Pub. L. 102–587 enacted identical sections. Title VIII of Pub. L. 102–587 was repealed by Pub. L. 106–562.
### §3331. Summoning and term

(a) In addition to such other grand juries as shall be called from time to time, each district court which is located in a judicial district containing more than four million inhabitants or in which the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, the Associate Attorney General, or any designated Assistant Attorney General, certifies in writing to the chief judge of the district that in his judgment a special grand jury is necessary because of criminal activity in the district shall order a special grand jury to be summoned at least once in each period of eighteen months unless another special grand jury is then serving. The grand jury shall serve for a term of eighteen months unless an order for its discharge is entered earlier by the court upon a determination of the grand jury by majority vote that its business has been completed. If, at the end of such term or any extension thereof, the district court determines the business of the grand jury has not been completed, the court may enter an order extending such term for an additional period of six months. No special grand jury term so extended shall exceed thirty-six months, except as provided in subsection (e) of section 3333 of this chapter.

(b) If a district court within any judicial circuit fails to extend the term of a special grand jury or enters an order for the discharge of such grand jury before such grand jury determines that it has completed its business, the grand jury, upon the affirmative vote of a majority of its members, may apply to the chief judge of the circuit for an order for the continuance of the term of the grand jury. Upon the making of such an application by the grand jury, the term thereof shall continue until the entry upon such application by the chief judge of the circuit of an appropriate order. No special grand jury term so extended shall exceed thirty-six months, except as provided in subsection (e) of section 3333 of this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 91–452, title I, §101(a), Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 923; amended Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7020(d), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4396.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–690 inserted ", the Associate Attorney General" after "Deputy Attorney General".
431 P.2d 743

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph Lucero NAVAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 8349.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Sept. 11, 1967.

Alan A. Norwood, Roswell, for appellant. - ,

Boston E. Witt, Atty. Gen., Donald W. Miller, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for ap-pellee.

OPINION

HENSLEY, Chief Judge, Court of Appeals.

In January, 1965, Joseph Lucero Navas entered pleas of guilty to three counts of burglary. In October, 1966, he filed a motion authorized by § 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A. 1953, to vacate the judgment and sentence. The motion was denied on October 5, 1966. On November 4, 1966, Navas filed an application asking the court to recon*366sider its order. • The application included one new ground for relief not presented in the first motion. The sentencing court entered an order denying the application on the same day that it was filed. On November 17, 1966, Navas filed a request for an order granting an appeal from the orders entered on October 5, 1966, and November 4, 1966. The sentencing court treated the request as a notice of appeal. In view of the. position of liberality adopted in Johnson v. Johnson, 74 N.M. 567, 396 P.2d 181 concerning nonjurisdictional deviations fom the rules, we will do the same.

Supreme Court Rule 5(1) re-, quires appeals from final judgments of the district courts to be perfected within thirty days. In Board of Education v. Rodriguez, 77 N.M. 309, 422 P.2d 351, we held that a failure to perfect a timely appeal is jurisdictional. Here, as has been shown, the request for appeal was filed November 17, 1966. The order appealed from had been, filed October 5, 1966. It necessarily follows that this court is without jurisdiction. Further, it may be noted that the application to reconsider filed November 4, 1966, came more than ten days after the entry of the order and accordingly was not timely as a motion under § 21-1-1(50) (b), § 21-1-1(52) (B.) (b), § 21-1-1(59) (b), N.M. S.A.1953.

We do not overlook the fact that iri the application for reconsideration a new ground for attack on the court’s judgment was advanced, viz., that the information which he. was called upon to answer was insufficient under § 41-6-7, N.M.S.A.1953. This was ruled on by the court adverse to appellant’s contention. The notice of appeal was taken-within thirty days of this ruling and would be timely as to it. However, no point on appeal is directed to this holding and, accordingly, there is nothing for us-to consider. Neither .can the advancing of a new ground in the application serve to .extend .the time perpiitted for taking an appeal from- the order denying re-, lief, entered more than thirty days before notice of appeal .was filed. .Compare Associates Discount Corporation v. DeVilliers, 74 N.M. 528, 395 P.2d 453 (1964).

The'appeal will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

It is so ordered.

CHAVEZ, C. J., and MQISE, J., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 294

 283

 293

 326

 339

 396

 428

 436

 434

 454

 449

 484

 463

 357

 335

 276

 309

 338

 322

 320

 328

 326

 326

 323

 318

 323

 346

 319

 305

 312

 313

 251

 243

 243

 264

 268

 272

 277

 274

 277

 272

 275

 304

 290

 255

 257

 237

 271

 282

 288

 298

 303

 281

 271

 282

 291

 284

 299

 295

 276

 263

 243

 270

 259

 264

 282

 290

 303

 316

 321

 319

 329

 337

 364

 329

 303

 288

 261

 291

 298

 299

 309

 313

 301

 291

 297

 302

 305

 316

 305

 292

 285

 276

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:August 10, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 183

 176

 179

 190

 195

 203

 211

 214

 213

 219

 224

 241

 219

 203

 194

 177

 196

 200

 201

 207

 209

 202

 196

 200

 203

 204

 211

 204

 196

 192

 187

TOTAL 9,315

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
§ 668.90 Authority and responsibilities of the hearing official. ( a ) The hearing official regulates the course of a hearing and the conduct of the parties during the hearing. The hearing official takes all necessary steps to conduct a fair and impartial hearing.
( b ) ( 1 ) The hearing official is not authorized to issue subpoenas.
( 2 ) If requested by the hearing official, the parties to a hearing shall provide available personnel who have knowledge about the matter under review for oral or written examination.
( c ) The hearing official takes whatever measures are appropriate to expedite a hearing. These measures may include, but are not limited to, the following— ( 1 ) Scheduling of conferences;
( 2 ) Setting time limits for hearings and submission of written documents; and
( 3 ) Terminating the hearing and issuing a decision against a party if that party does not meet those time limits.
( d ) The hearing official is bound by all applicable statutes and regulations. The hearing official may not— ( 1 ) Waive applicable statutes and regulations; or
( 2 ) Rule them invalid.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1094)
[51 FR 43325, Dec. 1, 1986, as amended at 57 FR 47753, Oct. 19, 1992; 59 FR 22448, Apr. 29, 1994. Redesignated at 82 FR 6257, Jan. 19, 2017]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 504

 497

 494

 502

 520

 520

 530

 530

 546

 539

 546

 548

 548

 548

 541

 563

 565

 548

 546

 552

 556

 531

 531

 574

 571

 524

 530

 533

 517

 528

 541

 410

 439

 445

 448

 459

 459

 469

 469

 461

 457

 460

 493

 476

 498

 502

 504

 509

 507

 508

 508

 504

 477

 482

 466

 462

 450

 470

 473

 481

 485

 469

 448

 460

 472

 481

 489

 493

 503

 507

 513

 513

 512

 518

 519

 523

 526

 538

 541

 531

 528

 524

 518

 502

 503

 501

 498

 486

 491

 496

 499

 512

 507

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 10, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 293

 300

 308

 313

 318

 321

 327

 329

 333

 333

 332

 336

 337

 339

 341

 348

 350

 344

 342

 340

 336

 326

 327

 326

 324

 316

 319

 323

 324

 332

 329

TOTAL 15,652

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
§ 658.33 What additional criterion does the Secretary apply to applications from organizations and associations? In addition to the criteria referred to in § 658.31, the Secretary evaluates an application submitted by an organization or association on the basis of the criterion in this section. ( a ) Need for and potential impact of the proposed project in improving international studies and the study of modern foreign language at the undergraduate level.
( b ) The Secretary reviews each application for information that shows the need for and the potential impact of the applicant's proposed projects in improving international studies and the study of modern foreign language at the undergraduate level. ( 1 ) The Secretary looks for information that shows— ( i ) The extent to which the applicant's proposed apportionment of Federal funds among the various budget categories for the proposed project will contribute to achieving results;
( ii ) The international nature and contemporary relevance of the proposed project;
( iii ) The extent to which the proposed project will make an especially significant contribution to the improvement of the teaching of international studies or modern foreign languages at the undergraduate level; and
( iv ) The adequacy of the applicant's provisions for sharing the materials and results of the proposed project with the higher education community.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1124(b))
[47 FR 14122, Apr. 1, 1982, as amended at 70 FR 13375, Mar. 21, 2005]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FORM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF SUNGARD DATA SYSTEMS INC. AS OF
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, BOTH INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE
FORM 10-Q OF SUNGARD DATA SYSTEMS INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          32,841
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  207,538
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,266
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               264,156
<PP&E>                                         308,700
<DEPRECIATION>                                 192,027
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 737,341
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          208,481
<BONDS>                                          3,037
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           868
<OTHER-SE>                                     524,955
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   737,341
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               609,557
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  386,493<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,956<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,015
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 93,639
<INCOME-TAX>                                    38,661
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             54,978
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    54,978
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.64<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62<F3>
<FN>
<F1>EXCLUDES SELLING, MARKETING AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, AND PURCHASED IN-
PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AND MERGER COSTS.
<F2>PURCHASED IN-PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS AND MERGER COSTS.
<F3>INCLUDES PURCHASED IN-PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AND MERGER COSTS
TOTALING $0.07 PER SHARE. ALSO, REFLECTS SEPTEMBER 1997 TWO-FOR-ONE STOCK
SPLIT.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Big Lake Financial Corporation
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, John A. Zelinske, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Big Lake Financial Corporation,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
         of operations of the Bank as of and for the period covered by the
         report.

Date: February 18, 2004       By:  /s/ John A. Zelinske
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                    John A. Zelinske, Senior Vice President and
                                    Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17461]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7246]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


Information Collection Request for OMB Review and Approval

AGENCY: Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC).

ACTION: Request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), agencies are required to publish a Notice in the Federal 
Register notifying the public that the Agency is preparing an 
information collection request for OMB review and approval and to 
request public review and comment on the submission. Comments are being 
solicited on the need for the information; the accuracy of the Agency's 
burden estimate, practical utility and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and on ways to minimize the reporting burden, including 
automated collection techniques and uses of other forms of technology. 
The proposed form, OMB control number 3420-0001, under review is 
summarized below.

DATES: Comments must be received within 60 days of publication of this 
notice.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the subject form and the request for review 
prepared for submission to OMB may be obtained from the Agency 
submitting officer. Comments on the form should be submitted to the 
Agency Submitting Officer.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OPIC Agency Submitting Officer: Essie 
Bryant, Record Manager, Overseas Private Investment Corporation, 1100 
New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20527; (202) 336-8563.

Summary Form Under Review

    Type of Request: Revised form.
    Title: Request for Registration for Political Risk Investment 
Insurance.
    Form Number: OPIC-50.
    Frequency of Use: Once per investor per project.
    Type of Respondents: Business or other institution (except farms); 
individuals.
    Description of Affected Public: U.S. companies or citizens 
investing overseas.
    Reporting Hours: \1/2\ hour per project.
    Number of Responses: 247 per year.
    Federal Cost: $2,841.00.
    Authority for Information Collection: Sections 231, 234(a), 239(d), 
and 240A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended.
    Abstract (Needs and Uses): The OPIC Form 50 is submitted by 
eligible investors to register their intent to make international 
investments, and ultimately, to seek OPIC political risk insurance.

    Dated: March 23, 2011.
Nichole Cadiente,
Administrative Counsel, Department of Legal Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2011-7246 Filed 3-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

680 

CA 15-01974 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND CARNI, JJ. 

 

WILLIAM M. EDDY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

DAVID ANTANAVIGE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

 

MURRAY JS KIRSHTEIN, UTICA, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

LONGERETTA LAW FIRM, UTICA (DAVID A. LONGERETTA OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (David

A. Murad, J.), entered July 1, 2015. The judgment awarded plaintiff

$25,000 together with interest thereon from June 14, 2013. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision

at Supreme Court.

Entered: September 30, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### The People of the State of New York v. Salvatore Oddo and Dominic Mundo.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
#### § 606.11 Severability.

If any provision of this subpart or its application to any person, act, or practice is held invalid, the remainder of the subpart or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or practice shall not be affected thereby.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1101 *et seq.*)

[85 FR 59981, Sept. 23, 2020]