alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PROMISSORY NOTE


$40,000                                                          May 29, 1997

                                
     For  value  received,  Kevin  Dunworth  ("Executive")  promises  to  pay on
November 29, 1997 to the order of Trans Leasing International,  Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the  "Company"),  at its offices in Northbrook,  Illinois,  or such
other  place as  designated  in  writing  by the holder  hereof,  the  aggregate
principal sum of $40,000.

     Interest shall accrue on the outstanding principal amount of this Note at a
rate equal to the prime rate of The First  National Bank of Chicago and shall be
payable at such time as the principal of this Note becomes due and payable.

     In the event  Executive  fails to pay any amounts due  hereunder  when due,
Executive  shall pay to the holder hereof,  in addition to such amounts due, all
costs of collection, including reasonable attorneys fees.

     Executive,  and  his  successors  and  assigns,  hereby  waives  diligence,
presentment,  protest and demand and notice of  protest,  demand,  dishonor  and
nonpayment  of this Note,  and  expressly  agrees that this Note, or any payment
hereunder,  may be  extended  from time to time and that the  holder  hereof may
accept security for this Note or release  security for this Note, all without in
any way affecting the liability of Executive hereunder.

     This  Note  shall  be  governed  by the  internal  laws,  not  the  laws of
conflicts, of the State of Illinois.


                                           By:/s/KEVINDUNWORTH
NO. 07-03-0297-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

OCTOBER 29, 2003

______________________________

SHAWN O’CONNELL LEWIS,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 44,391-E; HON. RICHARD DAMBOLD, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Opinion Dismissing Appeal

______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ.

Shawn O’Connell Lewis attempts to appeal his conviction for driving while

intoxicated. The court imposed his sentence in open court on April 19, 2002. At that time,

he orally informed the trial court of his desire to appeal. However, the record contains no

written notice of appeal filed within 30 days of April 19th. Nor does it contain a timely filed

motion for new trial. Instead, the first written instrument wherein he mentions his desire
1

The appropriate vehicle for seeking an out-of-time appeal from a final felony conviction is by writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See TEX. CODE CRIM .

PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 2004).

to appeal was sent to the district clerk and file-marked July 17, 2002. In it, appellant asked

about the status of his appeal.

Our appellate jurisdiction is triggered through a notice of appeal. Ashorn v. State,

77 S.W.3d 405, 409 (Tex. App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, pet. ref’d). The notice must not

only be timely but also in writing. State v. Riewe, 13 S.W.3d 408, 410 (Tex. Crim. App.

2000); Ashorn v. State, 77 S.W.3d at 409; see TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(c) (requiring a written

notice of appeal). An oral notice, even if made in open court, does not suffice. Shute v.

State, 744 S.W.2d 96, 97 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988); Ashorn v. State, 77 S.W.3d at 407;

Brunswick v. State, 931 S.W.2d 9, 11 (Tex. App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 1996, no pet.). Given

this, appellant’s oral notice on April 19, 2002, failed to satisfy appellate rule 25.2(c) and

trigger our jurisdiction. Nor did the missive file-marked by the district clerk in July of 2002

fill the void given its belatedness (and assuming it satisfied the other requirements of Rule

25.2).

Consequently, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.1

Brian Quinn

 Justice

Do not publish.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0244

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ZECHARIAH JUSTIN DANIEL SMITH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 11, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 5 2023

09/05/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0244
#### Jacob Diamond v. Herman T. Mendelsohn. (2 cases.)

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
§ 303.430 State dispute resolution options. ( a ) *General.* Each statewide system must include written procedures for the timely administrative resolution of complaints through mediation, State complaint procedures, and due process hearing procedures, described in paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section.
( b ) *Mediation.* Each lead agency must make available to parties to disputes involving any matter under this part the opportunity for mediation that meets the requirements in § 303.431.
( c ) *State complaint procedures.* Each lead agency must adopt written State complaint procedures to resolve any State complaints filed by any party regarding any violation of this part that meet the requirements in §§ 303.432 through 303.434.
( d ) *Due process hearing procedures.* Each lead agency must adopt written due process hearing procedures to resolve complaints with respect to a particular child regarding any matter identified in § 303.421(a), by either adopting— ( 1 ) The part C due process hearing procedures under section 639 of the Act that— ( i ) Meet the requirements in §§ 303.435 through 303.438; and
( ii ) Provide a means of filing a due process complaint regarding any matter listed in § 303.421(a); or
( 2 ) The part B due process hearing procedures under section 615 of the Act and §§ 303.440 through 303.449 (with either a 30-day or 45-day timeline for resolving due process complaints, as provided in § 303.440(c)).
( e ) *Status of a child during the pendency of a due process complaint.* ( 1 ) During the pendency of any proceeding involving a due process complaint under paragraph (d) of this section, unless the lead agency and parents of an infant or toddler with a disability otherwise agree, the child must continue to receive the appropriate early intervention services in the setting identified in the IFSP that is consented to by the parents.
( 2 ) If the due process complaint under paragraph (d) of this section involves an application for initial services under part C of the Act, the child must receive those services that are not in dispute.
(Approved by Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0678 and 1820-NEW) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1415(e), 1415(f)(1)(A), 1415(f)(3)(A)-(D), 1439)
#### Irving J. Wallach and Others v. John Byrne and Others.

Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 34

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

06/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
### §597. Expenditures to influence voting

Whoever makes or offers to make an expenditure to any person, either to vote or withhold his vote, or to vote for or against any candidate; and

Whoever solicits, accepts, or receives any such expenditure in consideration of his vote or the withholding of his vote—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if the violation was willful, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 721; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §601(a)(12), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3498.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on sections 250, 252, of title 2, U.S.C., 1940 ed., The Congress (Feb. 28, 1925, ch. 368, title III, §§311, 314, 43 Stat. 1073, 1074).

This section consolidates the provisions of sections 250 and 252 of title 2, U.S.C., 1940 ed., The Congress.

Reference to persons causing or procuring was omitted as unnecessary in view of definition of "principal" in section 2 of this title.

The punishment provisions of section 252 of title 2, U.S.C., 1940 ed., The Congress, were incorporated at end of section upon authority of reference in such section making them applicable to this section.

Words "or both" were added to conform to the almost universal formula of the punishment provisions of this title.

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–294 substituted "shall be fined under this title" for "shall be fined not more than $10,000" in last par.

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "shall be fined under this title" for "shall be fined not more than $1,000" in last par.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-4297WM

_____________

Flora L. Casey, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western

v. * District of Missouri.

*

Robert E. Rubin, Secretary, Department * [UNPUBLISHED]

of the Treasury, *

*

Appellee. *

_____________

 Submitted: August 3, 1998

Filed: August 7, 1998 

_____________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Flora L. Casey appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment

in Casey's employment discrimination suit under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29

U.S.C. §§ 791 and 794. We have carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs,

and conclude the district court's judgment was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See

8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 367.4 What regulations apply? The following regulations apply to the Independent Living Services for Older Individuals Who Are Blind program: ( a ) The Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) as follows: ( 1 ) 34 CFR part 75 (Direct Grant Programs), with respect to grants under subpart B and D.
( 2 ) 34 CFR part 76 (State-Administered Programs), with respect to grants under subpart E.
( 3 ) 34 CFR part 77 (Definitions That Apply to Department Regulations).
( 4 ) 34 CFR part 79 (Intergovernmental Review of Department of Education Programs and Activities).
( 5 ) 34 CFR part 81 (General Education Provisions Act—Enforcement).
( 6 ) 34 CFR part 82 (New Restrictions on Lobbying).
( 7 ) 2 CFR part 180 (OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement)), as adopted at 2 CFR part 3485.
( 8 ) 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards), as adopted at 2 CFR part 3474.
( b ) The regulations in this part 367.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 752 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 796k)
### Minor elements in bedrock soil, and vegetation at an outcrop of the Phosphoria Formation on Snowdrift Mountain southeastern Idaho

By: F.B. LotspeichE.L. Markward

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1181F

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (3449 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (512 pdf)                        
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT, SPLITTAIL and LONGFIN REPORT

April 2015

Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW data Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre Feet

Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval 

Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 546 990 1,536 1,083 1,964 3,047 0.0 0.0

2-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 546 989 1,535 1,083 1,962 3,045 0.0 0.0

3-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 229 988 1,217 455 1,959 2,414 0.0 0.0

4-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 546 988 1,534 1,083 1,959 3,042 0.0 0.0

5-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 496 989 1,485 983 1,962 2,945 0.0 0.0

6-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 275 988 1,263 546 1,960 2,506 0.0 0.0

7-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 449 991 1,440 891 1,966 2,857 0.0 0.0

8-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 y 449 989 1,438 891 1,961 2,852 0.0 0.0

9-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 449 987 1,436 891 1,958 2,849 0.0 0.0

10-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 449 988 1,437 891 1,960 2,851 0.0 0.0

11-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 541 988 1,529 1,073 1,960 3,033 0.0 0.0

12-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 450 989 1,438 892 1,961 2,853 0.0 0.0

13-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 y 4 n 450 989 1,438 892 1,961 2,853 0.0 0.0

14-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 y 375 989 1,364 744 1,962 2,706 0.0 0.0

15-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 y 0 n 658 986 1,644 1,305 1,956 3,261 0.0 0.0

16-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 664 986 1,651 1,318 1,956 3,274 0.0 0.0

17-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 552 987 1,539 1,095 1,957 3,052 0.0 0.0

18-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 266 989 1,255 527 1,962 2,489 0.0 0.0

19-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y 0 n 569 992 1,561 1,129 1,968 3,097 0.0 0.0

20-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 n 0 n 492 993 1,485 976 1,969 2,945 0.0 0.0

21-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y 4 n 445 992 1,436 882 1,967 2,849 0.0 0.0

22-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 y 0 n 510 992 1,501 1,011 1,967 2,978 0.0 0.0

23-Apr-15 0 y 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y 4 y 462 902 1,364 916 1,789 2,705 0.0 0.0

24-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 462 808 1,270 916 1,603 2,519 0.0 0.0

25-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 462 808 1,269 916 1,602 2,518 0.0 0.0

26-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n 695 804 1,498 1,378 1,594 2,972 0.0 0.0

27-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 n 0 n 464 802 1,265 920 1,590 2,510 0.0 0.0

28-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 n 0 n 684 803 1,487 1,356 1,593 2,949 0.0 0.0

29-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 n 0 n 633 803 1,435 1,255 1,592 2,847 0.0 0.0

30-Apr-15 0 n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 n 0 n 996 804 1,800 1,975 1,595 3,570 0.0 0.0

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 2 0 2 XXXX 60 12 15,262 28,291 43,553 30,273 56,115 86,388 XXXX XXXX

Official data is posted on CDFW's webpage.

SWP Fish Facility larval sampling not reported to CVO and CVP Tracy Fish Facility larval sampling started 3-13-2014.

DATE

Banks Tracy Combined Banks

Delta Smelt 

Daily Density

Tracy Combined SWP CVP
§ 686.20 Submission process and deadline for a SAR or ISIR. ( a ) *Submission process.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, an institution must disburse a TEACH Grant to a student who is eligible under § 686.11 and is otherwise qualified to receive that disbursement and electronically transmit disbursement data to the Secretary for that student if— ( i ) The student submits a SAR with an official EFC to the institution; or
( ii ) The institution obtains an ISIR with an official EFC for the student.
( 2 ) In determining a student's eligibility to receive a grant under this part, an institution is entitled to assume that the SAR information or ISIR information is accurate and complete except under the conditions set forth in 34 CFR 668.16(f).
( b ) *SAR or ISIR deadline.* Except as provided in 34 CFR 668.164(g), for a student to receive a grant under this part in an award year, the student must submit the relevant parts of the SAR with an official EFC to his or her institution or the institution must obtain an ISIR with an official EFC by the earlier of— ( 1 ) The last date that the student is still enrolled and eligible for payment at that institution; or
( 2 ) By the deadline date established by the Secretary through publication of a notice in the Federal Register.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070g, *et seq.*)
§ 30.20 To what do §§ 30.20-30.31 apply? ( a ) ( 1 ) ( i ) Sections 30.20-30.31 establish the general procedures used by the Secretary to collect debts by administrative offset.
( ii ) The Secretary uses the procedures established under other regulations, including § 30.33, What procedures does the Secretary follow for IRS tax refund offsets?, 34 CFR part 31, Salary Offset for Federal Employees Who Are Indebted to the United States Under Programs Administrated by the Secretary of Education, and 34 CFR part 32, Salary Offset to Recover Overpayments of Pay or Allowances from Department of Education Employees, if the conditions requiring application of those special procedures exists.
( 2 ) The word “offset” is used in this subpart to refer to the collection of a debt by administrative offset.
( b ) The Secretary does not rely on 31 U.S.C. 3716 as authority for offset if: ( 1 ) The debt is owed by a State or local government;
( 2 ) The debt, or the payment against which offset would be taken, arises under the Social Security Act;
( 3 ) The debt is owed under: ( i ) The Internal Revenue Code of 1954; or
( ii ) The tariff laws of the United States; or
( 4 ) The right to collect the debt first accrued more than ten years before initiation of the offset.
( c ) ( 1 ) The Secretary may rely on 31 U.S.C. 3716 as authority for offset of a debt to which paragraph (b)(4) of this section would otherwise apply if facts material to the Government's right to collect the debt were not known and could not reasonably have been known by the official or officials of the Government who are charged with the responsibility to discover and collect the debt.
( 2 ) If paragraph (c)(1) of this section applies, the Secretary may rely on 31 U.S.C. 3716 as authority for offset up to 10 years after the date that the official or officials described in that paragraph first knew or reasonably should have known of the right of the United States to collect the debt.
( d ) The Secretary determines when the right to collect a debt first accrued under the existing law regarding accrual of debts such as 28 U.S.C. 2415.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3(a)(1) and 1226a-1, 31 U.S.C. 3716(b))
[51 FR 24099, July 1, 1986, as amended at 51 FR 35646, Oct. 7, 1986; 53 FR 33425, Aug. 30, 1988; 54 FR 43583, Oct. 26, 1989]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

# AGENCY:

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting postponement.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of March 3, 2011 (76 FR 11764), concerning notice of a public hearing and meeting on March 31, 2011, with regard to the Department of Energy's and National Nuclear Security Administration's safety management and oversight of the contracts and contractors they rely upon to accomplish the mission assigned under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, at defense nuclear facilities. The public hearing and meeting has                               ( print page 17628)                            been postponed. The Board intends to reschedule the hearing and meeting and will publish a notice of the rescheduled date in the                         **Federal Register**                         when that date has been determined.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brian Grosner, General Manager, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue, NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2901, (800) 788-4016. This is a toll-free number.

Dated: March 28, 2011.

Peter S. Winokur,

Chairman.

[FR Doc. 2011-7612 Filed 3-28-11; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 3670-01-P
#### In the Matter of Albert A. Agor, Petitioner. Charles A. Haight, as Superintendent of Highways of the Town of Carmel, County of Putnam, Respondent.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
§ 361.175 What responsibility do States have to use quarterly wage record information for performance accountability? ( a ) ( 1 ) States must, consistent with State laws, use quarterly wage record information in measuring a State's performance on the primary indicators of performance outlined in § 361.155 and a local area's performance on the primary indicators of performance identified in § 361.205.
( 2 ) The use of social security numbers from participants and such other information as is necessary to measure the progress of those participants through quarterly wage record information is authorized.
( 3 ) To the extent that quarterly wage records are not available for a participant, States may use other information as is necessary to measure the progress of those participants through methods other than quarterly wage record information.
( b ) “Quarterly wage record information” means intrastate and interstate wages paid to an individual, the social security number (or numbers, if more than one) of the individual, and the name, address, State, and the Federal employer identification number of the employer paying the wages to the individual.
( c ) The Governor may designate a State agency (or appropriate State entity) to assist in carrying out the performance reporting requirements for WIOA core programs and ETPs. The Governor or such agency (or appropriate State entity) is responsible for: ( 1 ) Facilitating data matches;
( 2 ) Data quality reliability; and
( 3 ) Protection against disaggregation that would violate applicable privacy standards.