alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF C.F.O. PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Patrick B. Fox, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Datrek Miller International, Inc.

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(d)) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and 

 

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

August 15, 2005
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robin Lecky, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Gravitas
International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
     prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: December 28, 2003 /s/ Robin Lecky


<PAGE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Part 80

### CFR Correction

In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 72 to 80, revised as of July 1, 2010, on page 1160, in § 80.1466, in paragraph (h)(1), the equation is corrected to read as follows:

§ 80.1466 

* * * * *

(h) * * *

(1) * * *

Bond = G * $0.01

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2011-7822 Filed 3-31-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 9, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-30550

Conference Calendar

 

LAMAR H. MCKINLEY,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

JOSEPH HARO,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 02-CV-750

--------------------

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Lamar H. McKinley, federal inmate #08043-035, appeals the

denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. McKinley pleaded guilty

to a charge of felon in possession of a firearm and was sentenced

to 84 months’ imprisonment and three years’ supervised release. 

The sentence was ordered to run consecutively to McKinley’s 

15-year sentence for armed robbery.

McKinley asserts that he was entitled to credit towards his

federal sentence for time served from June 5, 1991, to October
No. 03-30550

-2-

14, 1992. He argues that U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3 authorized credit

against his federal sentence because the armed robbery was taken

into account in the computation of his offense level in the felon

in possession case. He argues that the Bureau Of Prisons (“BOP”)

lacks authority to issue credit against his sentence.

We review the district court’s factual findings for clear

error. Royal v. Tombone, 141 F.3d 596, 599 (5th Cir. 1998). 

The Attorney General, through the BOP, determines what credit,

if any, will be awarded to a prisoner for time spent in custody

prior to the commencement of his sentence. See United States

v. Wilson, 503 U.S. 329, 337 (1992). 

Time spent by a prisoner in federal custody for the purpose

of appearing in federal court via a writ of habeas corpus ad

prosequendum is not counted towards the federal sentence if

that time was credited towards his state sentence. United States

v. Brown, 753 F.2d 455, 456 (5th Cir. 1985). McKinley is not

entitled to the credit that he seeks because the time was

credited against his state sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b);

Vignera v. Attorney General, 455 F.2d 637, 638 (5th Cir. 1972). 

McKinley’s argument under U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3 that his federal

sentence should have been ordered to run concurrently concerns

an alleged error that occurred at sentencing and does not arise

under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Jeffers v. Chandler, 253 F.3d 827,

830 (5th Cir. 2001). Accordingly, the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
### §345. Administration, protection, and promotion

The administration, protection, and promotion of said Zion National Park shall be exercised under the direction of the Secretary of the Interior by the National Park Service, subject to the provisions of the Act of August 25, 1916, entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes," 1 and Acts additional thereto or amendatory thereof.

(Nov. 19, 1919, ch. 110, §2, 41 Stat. 356.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act of August 25, 1916, entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes,", referred to in text, is act Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, 39 Stat. 535, known as the National Park Service Organic Act, which enacted sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 100101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Sections 1 to 4 of the Act were repealed and restated as section 1865(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of Title 54 by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Obligation of Fees for Transportation Services at Zion or Rocky Mountain National Parks

For provisions relating to obligation of expenditure of fees prior to receipt for transportation service contracts, see section 140 of Pub. L. 108–7, set out as a note under section 195 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

1 See References in Text note below.
#### § 609.11 What is the duration of a grant?

The Secretary may award a grant under this part for a period of up to five academic years.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1063b(b))
#### Frances Skinner, as Administratrix, etc., of John A. Skinner, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*The Erie Railroad Company, Appellant.

*Railroad—negligence—action for death.*

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Orange on the 35th day of July, 1913, in favor of the plaintiff, and from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 33d day of July, 1913, denying its motion for a new trial.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred; Burr, J., read for reversal, with whom Thomas, J., concurred.

Burr, J.

(dissenting): I vote to reverse upon the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. Defendant is not liable unless the “ pusher engine ” moved forward. All of the direct evidence given by every witness called by the plaintiff or by the defendant is to the effect that it did not move. As against this plaintiff contends that if the head of the train stopped *exactly*where the witnesses say that it did, and if the pusher engine stopped in the first instance *exactly*where some of the witnesses say it did, and if the body was found *exactly*where Taylor and Cook say that it was, the pusher engine must have moved, since otherwise the rear of the caboose and the front of this engine could not have come in contact. The measurement of distances by witnesses under such circum stances, and the exact location of a body after an accident resulting in death, are circumstances about which witnesses may be both honestly and easily *926mistaken. On the other hand, the engineer and fireman and the other employees of the railroad company could not be mistaken as to whether the engine moved or not. Either it did not move, or they deliberately testified falsely. Positive evidence of a certain character like this, not improbable, and where the witnesses are neither impeached nor their testimony shaken on cross-examination, is not overcome by evidence so uncertain and liable to error as that upon which plaintiff must depend to sustain her verdict. Thomas, J., concurred.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean TDS

1 465 410 435 285

2 450 407 427 280

3 445 402 426 279

4 451 413 430 282

5 445 406 429 281

6 512 389 452 295

7 388 381 383 253

8 451 380 409 269

9 532 452 473 308

10 454 412 425 279

11 522 442 471 307

12 500 457 474 309

13 496 452 467 305

14 453 450 451 295

15 512 450 483 314

16 474 441 449 293

17 525 428 461 301

18 515 453 473 308

19 476 454 465 303

20 461 439 452 295

21 455 414 431 282

22 409 386 395 260

23 424 357 386 255

24 413 343 372 246

25 442 363 399 263

26 431 374 392 258

27 411 372 380 251

28 419 383 399 263

29 412 372 391 258

30 373 311 339 226

Total 12,819

COMMENT(S): 0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Check 21 

Run Date: 5/2/2024

April 2024
EXHIBIT 32.1



CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN, INC



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of California Pizza Kitchen, Inc (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard L. Rosenfield, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



May 13, 2004



By:

/s/ RICHARD L. ROSENFIELDRichard L. Rosenfield Co-Chief Executive Officer




---

EXHIBIT 32.1



CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN, INC



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of California Pizza Kitchen, Inc (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Larry S. Flax, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



May 13, 2004



By:

/s/ LARRY S. FLAXLarry S. Flax Co-Chief Executive Officer
Company Filings

Skip to Main Content
              -  About                  - Careers
                - Commissioners
                - Contact
                - Reports and Publications
                - Securities Laws
                - Mission 
              -  Divisions & Offices                  - Corporation Finance
                - Enforcement
                - Investment Management
                - Economic and Risk Analysis
                - Trading and Markets
                - Examinations
                - Office of Administrative Law Judges
                - Regional Offices
                - All Divisions and Offices 
              -  Enforcement                  - Litigation Releases
                - Administrative Proceedings
                - Opinions and Adjudicatory Orders
                - Accounting and Auditing
                - Trading Suspensions
                - How Investigations Work
                - Receiverships
                - Information for Harmed Investors 
              -  Regulation                  - Rulemaking Index
                - Proposed Rules
                - Final Rules
                - Interim Final Rules
                - Other Orders and Notices
                - Self-Regulatory Organizations
                - Staff Interpretations 
              -  Education                  - Investor.gov
                - Five Questions to Ask Before You Invest
                - About Investment Professionals
                - Check Your Investment Professional
                - Investing Tools and Calculators
                - Investment Products
                - Understanding Fees
                - Investor Alerts and Bulletins
                - Glossary 
              -  Filings                  - EDGAR Search & Access
                - Company Filing Search
                - How to Search EDGAR
                - Requesting Public Documents
                - Forms List
                - Information for Filers
                - About EDGAR 
              -  News                  - Press Releases
                - Speeches and Statements
                - Spotlight Topics
                - Upcoming Events
                - Webcasts
                - SEC in the News
                - SEC Videos
                - Media Gallery 

# Open Meeting Agenda

## Wednesday, March 14, 2018

| **Item 1:** | **Transaction Fee Pilot**                                                                         |
|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Office:     | Division of Trading and Markets                                                                   |
| Staff:      | Brett Redfearn, David Shillman, Richard Holley III, Johnna Dumler, Erika Berg, Benjamin Bernstein |
||
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000789945
<NAME> LOTUS PACIFIC, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         3193127
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4979759
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8933181
<PP&E>                                         1707015
<DEPRECIATION>                                  348286
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                16404225
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2013817
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          4
<COMMON>                                         47387
<OTHER-SE>                                       80000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  16404225
<SALES>                                       10998875
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              12832550
<CGS>                                          7989318
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7989318
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7198720
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (2137759)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (80714)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (2057045)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (2057045)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)
        

</TABLE>
### Fossils in Ordovician tuffs, northeastern Maine, with a section on Trilobita

By: R. B. NeumanH. B. Whittington

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1181E

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.