alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW data Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre Feet

Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval 

Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval 

Yor N

1-Apr-19 0 N 0 N 0 0 8 0 8 9 0 N 0 N 3,362 835 4,197 6,668 1,656 8,324 0.0 0.0

2-Apr-19 0 N 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 N 0 N 2,634 818 3,451 5,224 1,622 6,846 0.0 0.0

3-Apr-19 0 N 0 N 0 0 8 0 8 8 0 N 0 N 3,720 819 4,539 7,379 1,624 9,003 0.0 0.0

4-Apr-19 0 N 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 N 0 N 3,464 816 4,280 6,871 1,618 8,489 0.0 0.0

5-Apr-19 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 N 0 2,428 1,810 4,237 4,815 3,590 8,405 0.0 0.0

6-Apr-19 0 N 0 N 0 0 2 0 2 6 0 N 0 N 1,916 1,811 3,727 3,801 3,592 7,393 0.0 0.0

7-Apr-19 0 N 0 N 0 0 2 0 2 6 0 N 0 N 1,717 1,811 3,528 3,405 3,593 6,998 0.0 0.0

8-Apr-19 0 N 0 N 0 0 2 0 2 5 0 N 0 N 1,481 1,808 3,289 2,938 3,586 6,524 0.0 0.0

9-Apr-19 0 N 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 N 0 N 1,478 1,813 3,291 2,932 3,596 6,528 0.0 0.0

10-Apr-19 0 N 0 N 0 0 6 0 6 5 0 N 0 N 1,116 1,916 3,032 2,213 3,800 6,013 0.0 0.0

11-Apr-19 0 N 0 N 0 0 11 0 11 5 0 N 0 N 1,178 1,931 3,109 2,336 3,830 6,166 0.0 0.0

12-Apr-19 0 N 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 N 0 N 715 1,908 2,623 1,418 3,785 5,203 0.0 0.0

13-Apr-19 0 N 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 N 0 N 705 1,916 2,621 1,398 3,801 5,199 0.0 0.0

14-Apr-19 0 N 0 N 0 0 2 0 2 3 0 N 0 N 811 1,918 2,729 1,608 3,804 5,412 0.0 0.0

15-Apr-19 0 N 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 N 0 N 855 1,785 2,639 1,695 3,540 5,235 0.0 0.0

16-Apr-19 0 N 0 N 0 0 4 0 4 3 0 N 0 N 1,031 1,747 2,777 2,044 3,465 5,509 0.0 0.0

17-Apr-19 0 N 0 N 0 0 4 0 4 2 0 N 0 N 895 1,750 2,645 1,775 3,472 5,247 0.0 0.0

18-Apr-19 0 N 0 N 0 0 2 0 2 3 0 N 0 N 1,035 1,746 2,781 2,052 3,464 5,516 0.0 0.0

19-Apr-19 0 N 0 N 0 0 6 0 6 3 0 N 0 N 941 1,736 2,677 1,866 3,444 5,310 0.0 0.0

20-Apr-19 0 N 0 N 0 0 5 0 5 3 0 N 0 N 833 1,736 2,569 1,652 3,444 5,096 0.0 0.0

21-Apr-19 0 N 0 N 0 0 9 4 13 4 0 N 0 N 574 1,747 2,322 1,139 3,466 4,605 0.0 0.0

22-Apr-19 0 0 N 0 0 13 0 13 5 0 0 N 551 1,728 2,278 1,092 3,427 4,519 0.0 0.0

23-Apr-19 0 0 N 0 0 4 0 4 5 0 0 N 714 1,766 2,480 1,417 3,503 4,920 0.0 0.0

24-Apr-19 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 N 624 1,749 2,373 1,237 3,470 4,707 0.0 0.0

25-Apr-19 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 N 623 1,742 2,365 1,235 3,456 4,691 0.0 0.0

26-Apr-19 0 0 N 0 0 1 0 1 4 0 0 N 623 1,758 2,381 1,235 3,487 4,722 0.0 0.0

27-Apr-19 0 0 N 0 0 6 0 6 4 0 0 N 411 1,749 2,161 816 3,470 4,286 0.0 0.0

28-Apr-19 0 0 N 0 0 4 0 4 4 0 0 N 613 1,740 2,353 1,215 3,452 4,667 0.0 0.0

29-Apr-19 0 0 N 0 0 10 0 10 5 0 0 N 1,355 995 2,349 2,687 1,973 4,660 0.0 0.0

30-Apr-19 0 0 N 0 0 9 0 9 6 0 0 N 1,879 992 2,871 3,727 1,968 5,695 0.0 0.0

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 118 4 122 XXXX 0 0 40,277 48,398 88,676 79,890 95,998 175,888 XXXX XXXX

Official data is posted on CDFW's webpage.

Banks

Delta Smelt 

Daily Density

Tracy Combined SWP CVP

CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT, SPLITTAIL and LONGFIN REPORT

APRIL 2019

DATE

Banks Tracy Combined
§ 303.234 Initial decision; final decision. ( a ) The Hearing Official or Hearing Panel prepares an initial written decision that addresses each of the points in the notice sent by the Secretary to the lead agency under § 303.231, including any amendments to or further clarification of the issues under § 303.233(c).
( b ) The initial decision of a Hearing Panel is made by a majority of Hearing Panel members.
( c ) The Hearing Official or Hearing Panel mails, by certified mail with return receipt requested, a copy of the initial decision to each party (or to the party's counsel) and to the Secretary, with a notice stating that each party has an opportunity to submit written comments regarding the decision to the Secretary.
( d ) Each party may file comments and recommendations on the initial decision with the Hearing Official or Hearing Panel within 15 days of the date the party receives the Panel's decision.
( e ) The Hearing Official or Hearing Panel sends a copy of a party's initial comments and recommendations to the other parties by certified mail with return receipt requested. Each party may file responsive comments and recommendations with the Hearing Official or Hearing Panel within seven days of the date the party receives the initial comments and recommendations.
( f ) The Hearing Official or Hearing Panel forwards the parties' initial and responsive comments on the initial decision to the Secretary who reviews the initial decision and issues a final decision.
( g ) The initial decision of the Hearing Official or Hearing Panel becomes the final decision of the Secretary unless, within 25 days after the end of the time for receipt of written comments, the Secretary informs the Hearing Official or Hearing Panel and the parties to a hearing in writing that the decision is being further reviewed for possible modification.
( h ) The Secretary rejects or modifies the initial decision of the Hearing Official or Hearing Panel if the Secretary finds that it is clearly erroneous.
( i ) The Secretary conducts the review based on the initial decision, the written record, the transcript of the Hearing Official's or Hearing Panel's proceedings, and written comments.
( j ) The Secretary may remand the matter to the Hearing Official or Hearing Panel for further proceedings.
( k ) Unless the Secretary remands the matter as provided in paragraph (j) of this section, the Secretary issues the final decision, with any necessary modifications, within 30 days after notifying the Hearing Official or Hearing Panel that the initial decision is being further reviewed.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1437(c))
### §914. Creditors of the United States

Whoever falsely personates any true and lawful holder of any share or sum in the public stocks or debt of the United States, or any person entitled to any annuity, dividend, pension, wages, or other debt due from the United States, and, under color of such false personation, transfers or endeavors to transfer such public stock or any part thereof, or receives or endeavors to receive the money of such true and lawful holder thereof, or the money of any person really entitled to receive such annuity, dividend, pension, wages, or other debt, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 742; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §78 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §33, 35 Stat. 1095).

Words "prize money" after "pension" were deleted as repealed by act Mar. 3, 1899, ch. 413, 30 Stat. 1007, repealing all laws authorizing prize money distribution.

Mandatory punishment was rephrased in the alternative.

In the punishment provision the words "five years" were substituted for "ten years" to harmonize it with the punishment provisions in sections 287 and 1001 of this title, covering similar offenses. (See reviser's note under section 287 of this title.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000".
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quaterly Report on Form 10-QSB of North Shore
Capital IV, Inc., (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Gerard Werner,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.

Dated: October 3, 2005


/s/ Gerard Werner
Chief Executive Officer
October 3, 2005



This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7582]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Advisory Board for Exceptional Children

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) is announcing that the 
Advisory Board for Exceptional Children (Advisory Board) will hold its 
next meeting in Riverside, California. The purpose of the meeting is to 
meet the mandates of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 
2004 (IDEA) for Indian children with disabilities.

DATES: The Advisory Board will meet on Thursday, May 5, 2011, from 8 
a.m. to 4 p.m. and Friday, May 6, 2011, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. Pacific 
Standard Time.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Sherman Indian High School, 
9010 Magnolia Avenue, Riverside, California 92503; telephone number 
(951) 276-6325.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sue Bement, Designated Federal 
Official, Bureau of Indian Education, Albuquerque Service Center, 
Division of Performance and Accountability, 1011 Indian School Road, 
NW., Suite 332, Albuquerque, NM 87104; telephone number (505) 563-5274.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, the BIE is announcing that the Advisory Board will hold 
its next meeting in Riverside, California. The Advisory Board was 
established under the IDEA (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.) to advise the 
Secretary of the Interior, through the Assistant Secretary--Indian 
Affairs, on the needs of Indian children with disabilities. The 
meetings are open to the public.
    The following items will be on the agenda:
    <bullet> Report from Gloria Yepa, Supervisory Education Specialist, 
BIE, Division of Performance and Accountability.
    <bullet> Report from BIE Director's Office.
    <bullet> Report from Dr. Jeffrey Hamley, Associate Deputy Director, 
BIE.
    <bullet> Advisory Board work on priorities.
    <bullet> Native American Student Information System (NASIS) Update.
    <bullet> Native Star Update--Gaye Leia King.
    <bullet> Public Comment (via conference call, May 5, 2011, meeting 
only*).
    <bullet> Panel discussion with Special Education faculty from 
Sherman Indian School, Riverside, California.
    <bullet> BIE Advisory Board--Advice and Recommendations.
    *During the May 5, 2011, meeting, time has been set aside for 
public comment via conference call from 11:30 a.m.-12 p.m. Pacific 
Standard Time. The call-in information is: Conference Number 1-888-417-
0376, Passcode 1509140.

    Dated: March 21, 2011.
Donald Laverdure,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2011-7582 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-6W-P
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the annual report of American Dairy, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and President, and the Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of American Dairy,
Inc.





Date:
      April 30, 2010
                By:
                /s/ Leng You-BinLeng
      You-Bin, Director, Chief Executive Officer and
President(Principal
      Executive Officer)





Date:
      April 30, 2010
                By:
                /s/ Jonathan H. ChouJonathan
      H. Chou, Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Accounting and Financial
Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to American Dairy, Inc. and will be retained
by American Dairy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">1900 Albemarle, LLC, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>Guy Solon, Respondent, et al., Undertenant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Cohen, Hurkin, Ehrenfeld, Pomerantz &amp; Tenenbaum, LLP (Robert Ehrenfeld, Esq.), for appellant.The Legal Aid Society (Alexandra Heinegg, Esq.), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Marc Finkelstein, J.), dated January 13, 2016. The order granted tenant's motion to dismiss the petition and denied landlord's cross motion for summary judgment in a holdover summary proceeding.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.</p><p>Tenant, the recipient of a Section 8 subsidy for a rent-stabilized apartment that he has resided in since 1985, suffered a debilitating stroke in 2007 and was in a rehabilitation facility until he returned to his apartment in December 2010. Tenant's Section 8 subsidy was terminated in April 2010, effective July 31, 2008, because he had vacated his apartment. Landlord brought a nonpayment proceeding in 2011 for the recovery of the Section 8 portion of the rent, which proceeding was dismissed in 2014. Tenant's voucher was reinstated in June 2014, and landlord began receiving Section 8 payments in October 2014, following the completion of required repairs. Landlord commenced this holdover proceeding in August 2015, alleging that tenant had violated a substantial obligation of his tenancy under his initial 1985 lease and Rent Stabilization Code ยง 2524.3 (a) by failing to comply with his obligation to assure that his rent subsidy continued to be paid, and demanding that tenant pay landlord over $70,000 for the lost Section 8 <font color="FF0000">[*2]</font>subsidy. Landlord appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted tenant's motion to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action and denied landlord's cross motion for summary judgment.</p><p>A holdover proceeding based upon a landlord's termination of the lease may only be maintained where there is a conditional limitation in the lease providing for its early termination (<i>see Perrotta v Western Regional Off-Track Betting Corp.</i>, 98 AD2d 1 [1983]; <a href="../2016/2016_26217.htm" target="_blank"><i>Fourth Hous. Co., Inc. v Bowers</i>, 53 Misc 3d 43</a> [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2016]; <a href="../2014/2014_24116.htm" target="_blank"><i>St. Catherine of Sienna Roman Catholic Church, at St. Albans, Queens County v 118 Convent Assoc., LLC</i>, 44 Misc 3d 8</a> [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists [2014]). Here, as correctly noted by the Civil Court, the lease contains no such conditional limitation. We reach no other issue.</p><p>Accordingly, the order is affirmed.</p><p>SOLOMON, J.P., and ELLIOT, J., concur.</p><p>PESCE, J., taking no part.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: December 01, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
### **CHAPTER 13—CIVIL RIGHTS**

Sec.
241.
Conspiracy against rights.
242.
Deprivation of rights under color of law.
243.
Exclusion of jurors on account of race or color.
244.
Discrimination against person wearing uniform of armed forces.
245.
Federally protected activities.
246.
Deprivation of relief benefits.
247.
Damage to religious property; obstruction of persons in the free exercise of religious beliefs.
248.
Freedom of access to clinic entrances.
249.
Hate crime acts.
250.
Penalties for civil rights offenses involving sexual misconduct.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2022**—Pub. L. 117–103, div. W, title XII, §1202(a)(2), Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 924, added item 250.

**2009**—Pub. L. 111–84, div. E, §4707(b), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2841, added item 249.

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330023(a)(1), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2150, substituted "Freedom of access to clinic entrances" for "Blocking access to reproductive health services" in item 248.

Pub. L. 103–259, §4, May 26, 1994, 108 Stat. 697, added item 248.

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7018(b)(2), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4396, struck out "of citizens" after "rights" in item 241.

Pub. L. 100–346, §3, June 24, 1988, 102 Stat. 645, added item 247.

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–453, §4(b), Oct. 2, 1976, 90 Stat. 1517, added item 246.

**1968**—Pub. L. 90–284, title I, §102, Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 75, added item 245.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 13,311

 12,100

 10,236

 10,587

 8,963

 10,351

 12,076

 13,859

 12,777

 12,680

 13,992

 14,422

 15,020

 14,319

 13,957

 13,230

 12,640

 12,490

 11,686

 12,333

 13,838

 13,886

 13,164

 13,014

 13,015

 12,187

 12,017

 12,095

 13,079

 12,720

 5,156

 4,944

 4,532

 4,228

 3,140

 3,349

 3,394

 4,575

 3,332

 2,985

 2,730

 2,489

 4,215

 4,822

 4,209

 4,312

 4,544

 4,719

 4,919

 4,617

 5,040

 5,125

 4,678

 5,009

 4,575

 4,110

 4,228

 4,634

 4,961

 5,708

 8,960

 8,276

 7,638

 7,359

 6,333

 6,243

 6,801

 8,270

 8,246

 7,522

 7,541

 7,916

 8,871

 9,009

 8,324

 8,193

 8,341

 8,619

 8,397

 8,136

 8,763

 8,988

 8,677

 8,796

 8,427

 7,783

 7,668

 8,034

 8,789

 8,987

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

QFO LABS, INC.,

Appellant

v.

PARROT S.A., PARROT DRONES S.A.S., PARROT, 

INC.,

Appellees

______________________

2018-1663, 2018-1664

______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2016-

01550, IPR2016-01559.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

BRAD PEDERSEN, Patterson Thuente Pedersen, PA, 

Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also represented 

by PHILLIP A. COLE, Lommen Abdo, Minneapolis, MN;

CHAZ DE LA GARZA, Law Offices of Chaz De La Garza, Minneapolis, MN; CHARLES A. LEMAIRE, Lemaire Patent Law 

Firm PLLC, Burnsville, MN. 

 MATTHEW A. TRAUPMAN, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & 

Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellees. Also 
represented by JAMES M. GLASS; ARCHITH RAMKUMAR,

Washington, DC. 

 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (DYK, CLEVENGER, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 April 3, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
Exhibit 31.2

                         Section 302 Certification
                       Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB

I, Lizabeth M. Wolfson, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Clancy Systems
International, Inc.;

1.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

2.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;

3.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
for the small business issuer and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small
business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the
small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control
over financial reporting; and


<PAGE>

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and
the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting.


Date: December 28, 2007
/s/Lizabeth M. Wolfson
Chief Financial Officer






<PAGE>