alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6613** 

ROBERT JOSEPH BLAKE , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. PAUL PERRY; RUSSELL MATHENY, Captain; JAMES MCCLOUD, Captain; ONE FROM MENTAL HEALTH , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Charleston

. Thomas E. Johnston , District Judge. ( 2:10

- cv - 00923 )

Submitted : June 1 6 , 2011 Decided: June 21, 2011

Befor e NIEMEYER and GREGORY , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Robert Joseph Blake, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Robert Jose ph Blake appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. A. § 636(b)(1)(B) ( West 200 6 & Supp. 2010 ). The magistrate judge recomme nded that relief be denied and advised Blake that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge ’ s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845

- 46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Blake has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequat ely presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean 14 DAY ACCUM MEAN 14 DAY AVG MEAN

1 93 90 91 1,292 92

2 93 90 91 1,283 92

3 95 91 92 1,278 91

4 99 93 96 1,280 91

5 100 97 99 1,285 92

6 103 99 101 1,293 92

7 104 100 102 1,304 93

8 103 99 102 1,317 94

9 103 98 101 1,330 95

10 102 99 100 1,341 96

11 106 100 101 1,352 97

12 106 100 102 1,362 97

13 104 101 102 1,372 98

14 104 101 103 1,383 99

15 107 102 104 1,396 100

16 106 102 103 1,408 101

17 105 101 103 1,419 101

18 105 101 103 1,426 102

19 105 101 103 1,430 102

20 105 102 104 1,433 102

21 108 104 106 1,437 103

22 109 107 108 1,443 103

23 111 108 109 1,451 104

24 113 109 111 1,462 104

25 114 112 112 1,473 105

26 116 113 114 1,485 106

27 118 114 116 1,499 107

28 119 116 118 1,514 108

29 124 116 119 1,529 109

30 128 116 122 1,548 111

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Emmaton Bottom On The Sacramento River

Period: June 2023 Run Date: 7/10/2023
### §1673g. Conditional payment of antidumping duty

#### (a) General rule

For all entries, or withdrawals from warehouse, for consumption of merchandise subject to an antidumping duty order on or after the date of publication of such order, no customs officer may deliver merchandise of that class or kind to the person by whom or for whose account it was imported unless that person complies with the requirements of subsection (b) and deposits with the appropriate customs officer an estimated antidumping duty in an amount determined by the administering authority.

#### (b) Importer requirements

In order to meet the requirements of this subsection, a person shall—

(1) furnish, or arrange to have furnished, to the appropriate customs officer such information as the administering authority deems necessary for determining the export price (or the constructed export price) of the merchandise imported by or for the account of that person, and such other information as the administering authority deems necessary for ascertaining any antidumping duty to be imposed under this subtitle;

(2) maintain and furnish to the customs officer such records concerning the sale of the merchandise as the administering authority, by regulation, requires;

(3) state under oath before the customs officer that he is not an exporter, or if he is an exporter, declare under oath at the time of entry the constructed export price of the merchandise to the customs officer if it is then known, or, if not, so declare within 30 days after the merchandise has been sold, or has been made the subject of an agreement to be sold, in the United States; and

(4) pay, or agree to pay on demand, to the customs officer the amount of antidumping duty imposed under section 1673 of this title on that merchandise.

(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title VII, §738, as added Pub. L. 96–39, title I, §101, July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 174; amended Pub. L. 103–465, title II, §233(a)(2)(A)(iv), (B), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4898.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 103–465, §233(a)(2)(A)(iv), substituted "export price (or the constructed export price)" for "United States price".

Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 103–465, §233(a)(2)(B), substituted "constructed export price" for "exporter's sales price".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–465 effective, except as otherwise provided, on the date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States (Jan. 1, 1995), and applicable with respect to investigations, reviews, and inquiries initiated and petitions filed under specified provisions of this chapter after such date, see section 291 of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as a note under section 1671 of this title.
### §3053. Powers of marshals and deputies

United States marshals and their deputies may carry firearms and may make arrests without warrant for any offense against the United States committed in their presence, or for any felony cognizable under the laws of the United States if they have reasonable grounds to believe that the person to be arrested has committed or is committing such felony.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 817.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on section 504a of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Judicial Code and Judiciary (June 15, 1935, ch. 259, §2, 49 Stat. 378).

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of all other officers of Department of Justice and functions of all agencies and employees of such Department, with a few exceptions, transferred to Attorney General, with power vested in him to authorize their performance or performance of any of his functions by any of such officers, agencies, and employees, by Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3173, 64 Stat. 1261, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 632

 603

 547

 593

 619

 639

 649

 648

 691

 719

 729

 759

 803

 791

 775

 786

 797

 804

 793

 794

 872

 931

 929

 896

 908

 865

 796

 758

 813

 890

 358

 393

 404

 420

 462

 485

 486

 494

 503

 519

 522

 514

 511

 494

 499

 502

 509

 507

 500

 540

 530

 538

 552

 564

 582

 574

 584

 585

 601

 609

 459

 464

 455

 467

 492

 523

 536

 555

 574

 580

 582

 598

 619

 610

 602

 619

 626

 632

 619

 663

 633

 659

 679

 686

 699

 699

 692

 688

 730

 764

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:February 21, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 300

 303

 297

 305

 320

 339

 347

 359

 371

 374

 376

 386

 399

 393

 388

 399

 403

 407

 399

 426

 407

 423

 436

 440

 448

 448

 444

 441

 467

 488

TOTAL 18,204

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
#### August Belmont Hotel Company v. The City of New York. Hotel Astor v. The City of New York.

Motions to continue injunction and for stay denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 5,641

 4,865

 4,519

 4,219

 4,810

 4,561

 5,134

 5,872

 6,787

 8,232

 8,819

 8,745

 7,692

 6,811

 6,885

 6,564

 6,414

 5,682

 6,201

 6,098

 6,576

 6,447

 6,497

 5,841

 5,258

 5,722

 5,727

 6,007

 5,364

 4,707

 4,797

 747

 544

 531

 516

 546

 604

 572

 545

 811

 725

 911

 794

 700

 991

 807

 967

 798

 742

 776

 784

 651

 571

 473

 440

 486

 609

 427

 596

 518

 561

 600

 3,100

 2,629

 2,224

 2,113

 1,939

 1,849

 2,308

 2,705

 3,232

 3,708

 3,966

 3,779

 3,555

 3,429

 3,449

 3,466

 3,009

 2,685

 2,453

 2,458

 2,555

 2,578

 2,614

 2,387

 2,381

 2,498

 2,564

 2,598

 2,369

 2,439

 2,217

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 8, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

14 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

14 DAY

AVG

MEAN

 41,921

 41,593

 40,772

 39,991

 38,840

 37,454

 36,594

 35,961

 35,796

 36,437

 37,347

 38,369

 39,532

 40,536

 40,885

 41,722

 42,507

 43,079

 43,593

 44,202

 44,449

 44,322

 43,704

 42,383

 40,798

 39,517

 38,526

 37,695

 36,615

 35,588

 34,796

 2,994

 2,971

 2,912

 2,857

 2,774

 2,675

 2,614

 2,569

 2,557

 2,603

 2,668

 2,741

 2,824

 2,895

 2,920

 2,980

 3,036

 3,077

 3,114

 3,157

 3,175

 3,166

 3,122

 3,027

 2,914

 2,823

 2,752

 2,693

 2,615

 2,542

 2,485

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

EMMATON BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 396

 388

 368

 369

 362

 373

 400

 373

 414

 412

 378

 383

 372

 358

 357

 347

 348

 360

 366

 369

 344

 334

 331

 511

 511

 558

 523

 525

 520

 515

 518

 361

 367

 346

 344

 339

 330

 337

 314

 313

 317

 316

 318

 324

 326

 324

 326

 327

 328

 327

 329

 325

 303

 282

 312

 326

 341

 358

 400

 358

 342

 335

 384

 374

 356

 360

 349

 353

 358

 333

 331

 339

 335

 334

 335

 335

 336

 334

 336

 339

 341

 341

 334

 323

 316

 408

 458

 448

 455

 478

 471

 463

 459

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:December 8, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 253

 247

 236

 238

 232

 234

 237

 222

 221

 226

 223

 222

 223

 223

 224

 222

 224

 226

 227

 227

 222

 216

 211

 268

 299

 293

 297

 311

 307

 302

 300

TOTAL 11,516

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
§ 76.131 How does an insular area apply for a consolidated grant? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70336 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) An Insular Area that desires to apply for a grant consolidating two or more programs listed in § 76.125(c) shall submit to the Secretary an application that: ( 1 ) Contains the assurances in § 76.132; and
( 2 ) Meets the application requirements in paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) The submission of an application that contains these requirements and assurances takes the place of a separate State plan or other similar document required by this part or by the authorizing statutes and regulations for programs included in the consolidated grant.
( c ) An Insular Area shall include in its consolidated grant application a program plan that: ( 1 ) Contains a list of the programs in § 76.125(c) to be included in the consolidated grant;
( 2 ) Describes the program or programs in § 76.125(c) under which the consolidated grant funds will be used and administered;
( 3 ) Describes the goals, objectives, activities, and the means of evaluating program outcomes for the programs for which the Insular Area will use the funds received under the consolidated grant during the fiscal year for which it submits the application, including needs of the population that will be met by the consolidation of funds; and
( 4 ) Contains a budget that includes a description of the allocation of funds—including any anticipated carryover funds of the program in the consolidated grant from the preceding year—among the programs to be included in the consolidated grant.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1880-0513) (Authority: 48 U.S.C. 1469a)
[47 FR 17421, Apr. 22, 1982, as amended at 53 FR 49143, Dec. 6, 1988]
Exhibit 10.1


 


Tower
Tech Holdings Inc. Board Compensation Plan


 


Effective October 24, 2007


 


Eligibility:             All members of the board of directors of
Tower Tech Holdings Inc. who are not (i) employees of Tower Tech Holdings Inc.
or (ii) otherwise being compensated by Tower Tech Holdings Inc.


 


Cash Fee:              Each eligible director shall be paid a cash
fee of $3,750 per calendar quarter for board membership, $600 for each Board or
stockholder meeting that he or she personally attends and $500 for each Board
or stockholder meeting that he or she telephonically attends. Committee
chairpersons shall be paid an additional cash fee of $3,750 per calendar
quarter, $1,100 for each committee meeting that he or she personally attends
and $500 for each committee meeting that he or she telephonically attends. Other
committee members shall be paid $600 for each committee meeting that he or she
personally attends and $500 for each committee meeting that he or she
telephonically attends. Payments shall be made quarterly in arrears by the end
of the first month following the quarter.
§ 76.794 How does an SEA allocate funds to charter school LEAs under a covered program in which the SEA awards subgrants on a discretionary basis? ( a ) *Competitive programs.* ( 1 ) For covered programs in which the SEA awards subgrants on a competitive basis, the SEA must provide each eligible charter school LEA in the State that is scheduled to open on or before the closing date of any competition under the program a full and fair opportunity to apply to participate in the program.
( 2 ) An SEA is not required to delay the competitive process in order to allow a charter school LEA that has not yet opened or significantly expanded its enrollment to compete for funds under a covered program.
( b ) *Noncompetitive discretionary programs.* The requirements in this subpart do not apply to discretionary programs or portions of programs under which the SEA does not award subgrants through a competition.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 8065a)
# Official Journal C 65E/17 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 65E |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4817 March 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 65E

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4817 March 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 065E/1 | Report from the Commission on the working of committees during 2003 (COM(2004) 860) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 065E/1

Report from the Commission on the working of committees during 2003 (COM(2004) 860)

(COM(2004) 860)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT AND SPLITTAIL

November-10

Note: Shaded area not verified with DFG data Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily Tota

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre Fee

DATE Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 5,160 4,105 9,265 10,234 8,143 2-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5,074 4,097 9,172 10,065 8,127 3-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4,960 4,126 9,086 9,839 8,184 4-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4,932 4,109 9,041 9,782 8,155-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5,909 4,117 10,026 11,720 8,166 6-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1,549 4,119 5,669 3,073 8,177-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 2 0 0 6,629 4,226 10,856 13,149 8,383 8-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 4,809 4,122 8,930 9,538 8,175 9-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4,864 4,122 8,986 9,648 8,175 

10-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5,239 4,113 9,353 10,392 8,159 11-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5,239 4,080 9,319 10,392 8,093 12-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 2 0 0 5,465 4,132 9,597 10,840 8,195 

13-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 4,815 4,129 8,944 9,551 8,189 14-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4,138 4,128 8,266 8,208 8,187 15-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4,174 3,913 8,088 8,280 7,762 16-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4,166 4,159 8,325 8,263 8,250 17-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4,392 4,108 8,500 8,712 8,148 18-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4,110 4,104 8,214 8,152 8,140 19-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4,107 4,138 8,245 8,146 8,208 20-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4,494 4,039 8,532 8,913 8,0121-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4,489 4,075 8,564 8,904 8,083 22-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4,489 4,062 8,551 8,904 8,056 23-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 5,525 4,101 9,626 10,959 8,134 

24-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5,921 4,100 10,022 11,745 8,133 

25-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 1 0 0 5,618 4,106 9,724 11,144 8,144 26-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 4 4 8 1 0 0 5,541 4,120 9,661 10,990 8,173 27-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 1 0 0 5,428 4,121 9,549 10,767 8,174 28-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6,150 4,119 10,269 12,198 8,170 29-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5,840 4,098 9,938 11,584 8,129 30-Nov-10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5,739 4,103 9,843 11,384 8,139 

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 22 14 36 XXXX 0 0 148,967 123,192 272,159 295,476 244,352 

Official data is posted on DFG's webpage.

Banks Tracy Combined Banks 

Tracy
Exhibit 10.11



 Exhibit 10.11 
 November 1, 2007 
 Capitol Acquisition Corp. 
 509 7th Street, N.W. 
 Washington, D.C. 20004 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 Each of the undersigned agrees that
it will not transfer its ownership interests in Capitol Acquisition Management LLC to anyone other than the founders of Capitol Acquisition Corp. (“Company”) or entities of which such founders are the beneficial owners, or beneficiaries,
of until the transfer restrictions (as more fully described in the Company’s Registration Statement relating to its initial public offering and in the Escrow Agreement filed as an exhibit to such Registration Statement) relating to the
Company’s securities held by Capitol Acquisition Management LLC are removed. 

	
	 /s/ Mark Ein

	Mark Ein
	
	 /s/ Amanda Eilian

	Amanda Eilian
	
	 /s/ Jonathan Ledecky

	Jonathan Ledecky
	
	 /s/ Gene Samburg

	Gene Samburg
	
	 /s/ Jon Ein

	Jon Ein
	
	 /s/ Marion Ein-Lewin

	Marion Ein-Lewin
	
	 /s/ Daniel Ein

	Daniel Ein
I , 

. ’ ,r:~. 

‘.. i 

, 

OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY OENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

-c.- 

-- , 
Bmorable Clinton Ovrloy, ?be 2 

& the QUO Or mrl8 VI htiiOipa1 tbsll 

S.W. (24) 355 (Clv. App.1 (error dimi 

@38UI 

S84) th 6) 0ouPt 

ing O? AFtiele 6058 acek88 the follovFng &ments 

Second, I). 0886) Vhers a olty b,9 it8 

cltr iigi8iatm body has reduced a gas rate in 

vhioh er~nt the gas utility may appeal by petltlon 

and 'bond' in Iterm and cnnditlom aa the Caxmnisrion may dirwt,* in vhioh event a heari.fq ahall 

be h&l aad the CoImlraion 'may n1&8 such order . . , 

in regard to the matter . . . a8 the Ccsml~alon may 

dpem jurt and reasonsble.*" 

Thu8, it 18 plain irom the vording of the atatute 

that the mnner in whlah c1 oomplatniug utility appee;;ls to the 

Commlealon ifi by flM.n$ a petition and bond. The filing of 

8Wh iQlitPUtWnt0 18 Q@~~86tlsPy t0 OffeOt the spgeti ~UthOrlEed 

by and provided ioF in the 8tatUte. 

The bond is filed 'on 8UUh term and conditiona u 

the CosPlni8liOLl l&54? diPCOOt.' b the above cited oa8t1 the puettion arose 88 to the authority of the Railroad Oar01i88ion WIder Article 6058 to approve Owl aocept 8 aupsrrs6esr bond. We 

quote ~Po!o the deoirlon Of the Court 81 fO11OW81 

‘We believe the statute authorlmd the railroad to use it8 dirorstion a8 to the ticsmu aad 

COiIdltiOJl8 of the bond. 

to allow 8 8UpsP89deas." 

Thi8 inC1Ude8 the ~OVOP 

Ronce, it i8 a,#,,n aat It.&@ Vitbiu the di8Ol'dtiOXA Or the &I?Imiralon as to the term8 sad Conditions vhiah will be impoeed. 

But thlr dirorotion doe8 not dispenre with the requiremeat that 

a bond be filed. 

You ssk vhsther the Cmmirsim ?aay requlxa eaah ln 

lisu of SUCh bond. 

“A ocmm.leaIon, agenay, OP board derive8 &Xx3. 

lta povere Aon the at;atutes vhlcb aonfsr them.' 

. 
fw-. ft thW rOllOW 81 t0 th3.8 litf&&3Yt 

that tha Railroad Corniuiaxl aatr only aa ml 

qpnt or the Lagielattwe d with nowhwOr eatpamIs y. 

. The &&f8~tUPO thought that the bond VW a mf'fiolsnt protw3tion, and it ir not within th6 provlnoe of this 

depwtmcmt to qw8tLon the vludom of ths Iag%alatuPe in t&.%0 

6oluIootlon. ¶%a &gl6lature prwlded for a bands it aaaearula 

provlela% for setting uide a oartain przcunt 0r wah In lbu 0r the bond. 

w 

I 

e ffeor 8 U.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Alexandria Division 

In the Matter of: 

 Chapter 13

PETER ALLEN JUSTEN 19-12094-KHK

 Debtor

TRUSTEE’S JOINDER TO MOTION TO DISMISS 

Thomas P. Gorman, Trustee, notes his joinder to The Bank of Charles Town’s 

Motion to Dismiss, and notes that Debtor did not appear for his August 6, 2019 

Creditor’s Meeting. 

_August 12, 2019______ _/s/ Thomas P. Gorman ________ 

Dated Thomas P. Gorman 

Chapter 13 Trustee 

300 N. Washington Street, #400 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

(703) 836-2226 

VSB #26421 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this 12th day of August, 2019 mailed a true copy of the 

foregoing Joinder to Motion to Dismiss to the following parties. 

Peter Allen Justen 

Chapter 13 Debtor 

P.O. Box 895 

Middleburg, VA 20118 

John Paul Goetz, Esq. 

Counsel for Debtor 

86 W. Shirley Avenue 

Warrenton, VA 20186

 ___/s/ Thomas P. Gorman ______ 

 Thomas P. Gorman 

Case 19-12094-KHK Doc 22 Filed 08/12/19 Entered 08/12/19 13:38:06 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
### §120. Scope of exclusive rights in architectural works

(a) Pictorial Representations Permitted.—The copyright in an architectural work that has been constructed does not include the right to prevent the making, distributing, or public display of pictures, paintings, photographs, or other pictorial representations of the work, if the building in which the work is embodied is located in or ordinarily visible from a public place.

(b) Alterations to and Destruction of Buildings.—Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106(2), the owners of a building embodying an architectural work may, without the consent of the author or copyright owner of the architectural work, make or authorize the making of alterations to such building, and destroy or authorize the destruction of such building.

(Added Pub. L. 101–650, title VII, §704(a), Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5133.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to any architectural work created on or after Dec. 1, 1990, and any architectural work, that, on Dec. 1, 1990, is unconstructed and embodied in unpublished plans or drawings, except that protection for such architectural work under this title terminates on Dec. 31, 2002, unless the work is constructed by that date, see section 706 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as an Effective Date of 1990 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
#### Josephine W. Schermerhorn, Appellant, v. Nathaniel E. Schermerhorn, Respondent.

Order reversed, without costs, and motion for interlocutory judgment granted, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.