Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 62 / Thursday, March 31, 2011 / Notices 17835 

3The company name listed above was misspelled 

in the initiation notice that published on February 

24, 2011 (76 FR 10329). The correct spelling of the 

company name is listed in this notice. 4The initiation of the administrative review for 

the above referenced case will be published in a 

separate initiation notice. 5The initiation of the administrative review for 

the above referenced case will be published in a 

separate initiation notice. 6The initiation of the administrative review for 

the above referenced case will be published in a 

separate initiation notice. 7 If one of the above-named companies does not 

qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of 

Certain Preserved Mushrooms from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) who have not qualified 

for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this 

review as part of the single PRC entity of which the 

named exporters are a part. 

8 If one of the above-named companies does not 

qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the PRC 

who have not qualified for a separate rate are 

deemed to be covered by this review as part of the 

single PRC entity of which the named exporters are 

a part. 

9 If one of the above-named companies does not 

qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of 

Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes from the PRC 

who have not qualified for a separate rate are 

deemed to be covered by this review as part of the 

single PRC entity of which the named exporters are 

a part. 

10 If one of the above-named companies does not 

qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of 

Uncovered Innerspring Units from the PRC who 

have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to 

be covered by this review as part of the single PRC 

entity of which the named exporters are a part. 

11 If one of the above-named companies does not 

qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the PRC 

who have not qualified for a separate rate are 

deemed to be covered by this review as part of the 

single PRC entity of which the named exporters are 

a part. 

12Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(c) the Department 

received a request to defer the administrative 

review with respect to Misumi Corporation for one 

year. The Department did not receive any objections 

to the deferral within 15 days after the end of the 

anniversary month. As such, we will initiate the 

administrative review with respect to Misumi 

Corporation in the month immediately following 

the next anniversary month. 

Period to be reviewed 

Vinh Hoan Corp. 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings 

None. 

Suspension Agreements 

None. 

Deferral of Initiation of Administrative Review 

Japan: Stainless Steel Bar,12 A–588–833 ................................................................................................................................ 2/1/10–1/31/11 

Misumi Corporation 

During any administrative review 

covering all or part of a period falling 

between the first and second or third 

and fourth anniversary of the 

publication of an antidumping duty 

order under 19 CFR 351.211 or a 

determination under 19 CFR 

351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or 

suspended investigation (after sunset 

review), the Secretary, if requested by a 

domestic interested party within 30 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation of the review, will 

determine, consistent with FAG Italia v. 

United States, 291 F.3d 806 (Fed. Cir. 

2002), as appropriate, whether 

antidumping duties have been absorbed 

by an exporter or producer subject to the 

review if the subject merchandise is 

sold in the United States through an 

importer that is affiliated with such 

exporter or producer. The request must 

include the name(s) of the exporter or 

producer for which the inquiry is 

requested. 

For the first administrative review of 

any order, there will be no assessment 

of antidumping or countervailing duties 

on entries of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption during the relevant 

provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of 

the order, if such a gap period is 

applicable to the POR. 

Interested parties must submit 

applications for disclosure under 

administrative protective orders in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On 

January 22, 2008, the Department 

published Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Documents Submission Procedures; 

APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January 

22, 2008). Those procedures apply to 

administrative reviews included in this 

notice of initiation. Parties wishing to 

participate in any of these 

administrative reviews should ensure 

that they meet the requirements of these 

procedures (e.g., the filing of separate 

letters of appearance as discussed at 19 

CFR 351.103(d)). 

Any party submitting factual 

information in an antidumping duty/ 

countervailing duty (‘‘AD/CVD’’) 

proceeding must certify to the accuracy 

and completeness of that information. 

See section 782(b) of the Act. Parties are 

hereby reminded that revised 

certification requirements are in effect 

for company/government officials as 

well as their representatives in all 

segments of any AD/CVD proceedings 

initiated on or after March 14, 2011. See 

Certification of Factual Information to 

Import Administration During 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Interim Final Rule, 76 FR 

7491 (February 10, 2011) (‘‘Interim Final 

Rule’’), amending 19 CFR 351.303(g)(1) 

and (2). The formats for the revised 

certifications are provided at the end of 

the Interim Final Rule. The Department 

intends to reject factual submissions in 

any proceeding segments initiated on or 

after March 14, 2011 if the submitting 

party does not comply with the revised 

certification requirements. 

These initiations and this notice are 

in accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)), and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i). 

Dated: March 28, 2011. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7623 Filed 3–30–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–570–937] 

Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Extension of Time Limit for the 

Preliminary Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 31, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Krisha Hill or Lilit Astvatsatrian, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 8, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4037 or (202) 482– 

6412, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES
17836 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 62 / Thursday, March 31, 2011 / Notices 

Background 

On June 30, 2010, the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) published 

the initiation of the administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on citric acid and certain citrate salts 

(‘‘citric acid’’) from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Deferral of Administrative 

Review, 75 FR 37759 (June 30, 2010). On 

January 25, 2011, the Department 

published the extension of time limits 

for the preliminary results of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order. See Citric Acid 

and Certain Citrate Salts from the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of 

Extension of Time Limit for the 

Preliminary Results of the Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 4288 

(January 25, 2011). This review covers 

the periods November 20, 2008, through 

May 19, 2009, and May 29, 2009, 

through April 30, 2010. The preliminary 

results of review are currently due no 

later than April 1, 2011. 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results of Review 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the 

Act’’), the Department shall make a 

preliminary determination in an 

administrative review of an 

antidumping duty order within 245 

days after the last day of the anniversary 

month of the date of publication of the 

order. The Act further provides, 

however, that the Department may 

extend that 245-day period to 365 days 

if it determines it is not practicable to 

complete the review within the 

foregoing time period. 

The Department finds that it is not 

practicable to complete the preliminary 

results of the administrative review of 

citric acid from the PRC within this time 

limit. Specifically, additional time is 

needed to examine the respondents’ 

production process, factors of 

production (FOPs), and determine 

surrogate values with which to value 

FOPs. Therefore, in accordance with 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the 

Department is extending the time period 

for completion of the preliminary 

results of this review, which is currently 

due on April 1, 2011, by 60 days. 

Therefore, the preliminary results are 

now due no later than May 31, 2011. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 

and 777(i) of the Act. 

March 25, 2011. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7626 Filed 3–30–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–851] 

Certain Preserved Mushrooms From 

the People’s Republic of China: 

Initiation of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) has received a request 

for a new shipper review (NSR) of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

preserved mushrooms from the People’s 

Republic of China (PRC). In accordance 

with section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 

19 CFR 351.214(d), we are initiating an 

antidumping duty NSR of Zhangzhou 

Long Mountain Foods Co., Ltd. (Long 

Mountain). The period of review (POR) 

of this NSR is February 1, 2010, through 

January 31, 2011. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 31, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred 

Baker, Scott Hoefke, or Robert James, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, 

telephone: (202) 482–2924, (202) 482– 

4947, or (202) 482–0649, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 19, 1999, the Department 

published the antidumping duty order 

on certain preserved mushrooms from 

the PRC. See Notice of Amendment of 

Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty 

Order: Certain Preserved Mushrooms 

From the People’s Republic of China, 64 

FR 8308 (February 19, 1999). Thus, the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

preserved mushrooms from the PRC has 

a February anniversary month. On 

February 28, 2011, the Department 

received a request for an NSR from Long 

Mountain. In its request for review, 

Long Mountain identified itself as both 

exporter and producer of the subject 

merchandise. The Department 

determined that Long Mountain’s 

request contained certain deficiencies 

and requested that it correct its 

submission. See March 15, 2011 letter 

from Robert James, Program Manager, to 

Long Mountain. In accordance with the 

Department’s requests, Long Mountain 

corrected the problems in its initial 

submission in a revised submission 

dated March 18, 2011. For the purpose 

of initiating this NSR, the Department 

determines that Long Mountain’s 

request for an NSR was timely filed. 

Pursuant to the requirements set forth 

in section 751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Act and 

19 CFR 351.214(b)(2), Long Mountain 

certified that (1) It did not export subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the period of investigation (POI) (see 

section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the Act and 

19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(i)); (2) since the 

initiation of the investigation it has 

never been affiliated with any company 

that exported subject merchandise to the 

United States during the POI, including 

those companies not individually 

examined during the investigation (see 

section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the Act 

and19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A)); and (3) 

its export activities were not controlled 

by the central government of the PRC 

(see 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B)). 

Additionally, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iv), Long Mountain 

submitted documentation establishing 

the following: (1) The date on which it 

first shipped subject merchandise to the 

United States; (2) the volume of its first 

shipment; and (3) the date of its first 

sale to an unaffiliated customers in the 

United States. In accordance with 19 

CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iv)(B), Long 

Mountain also provided the volume of 

its one subsequent shipment, dated 

January 30, 2011, which the company 

indicated was in transit to the United 

States. 

Initiation of Review 

Based on information on the record, 

and in accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.214(d), we find the request Long 

Mountain submitted meets the statutory 

and regulatory requirements for 

initiation of an NSR. See Memorandum 

to the File through Richard Weible, 

‘‘Initiation of AD New Shipper Review: 

Certain Preserved Mushrooms from the 

People’s Republic of China (A–570– 

851),’’ dated March 31, 2011. 

Accordingly, we are initiating an NSR of 

the antidumping duty order on certain 

preserved mushrooms from the PRC 

produced and exported by Long 

Mountain. This review covers the 

period February 1, 2010, through 

January 31, 2011. We intend to issue the 

preliminary results of this review no 

later than 180 days after the date on 

which this review is initiated, and the 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES