alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 15—CLAIMS AND SERVICES IN MATTERS AFFECTING GOVERNMENT**

Sec.
[281 to 284. Repealed.]
285.
Taking or using papers relating to claims.
286.
Conspiracy to defraud the Government with respect to claims.
287.
False, fictitious or fraudulent claims.
288.
False claims for postal losses.
289.
False claims for pensions.
290.
Discharge papers withheld by claim agent.
291.
Purchase of claims for fees by court officials.
292.
Solicitation of employment and receipt of unapproved fees concerning Federal employees' compensation.
[293.
Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2002**—Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, §4002(c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1808, repealed amendment by Pub. L. 104–294, §602(d). See 1996 Amendment note below.

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–106, div. D, title XLIII, §4304(c)(2), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 664, struck out item 281 "Restrictions on retired military officers regarding certain matters affecting the Government". Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §602(d), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3503, which amended analysis identically, was repealed by Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, §4002(c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1808, effective Oct. 11, 1996.

**1989**—Pub. L. 101–123, §3(a), Oct. 23, 1989, 103 Stat. 760, struck out item 293 "Limitation on Government contract costs".

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–700, §3(b), Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4633, added item 293.

**1987**—Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title VIII, §822(b)(2), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1133, added item 281, struck out former item 281 "Compensation to Members of Congress, officers, and others in matters affecting Government", item 282 "Practice in Court of Claims by Members of Congress", item 283 "Officers or employees interested in claims against the Government", and item 284 "Disqualification of former officers and employees in matters connected with former duties".

**1966**—Pub. L. 89–554, §3(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 608, added item 292.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT  TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Douglas G. Gregg, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Paramco Financial Group, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based upon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting  which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls.



Date:  November  19, 2004.





By:

/ Douglas G. Gregg/



Douglas G. Gregg

President and

Chief Executive Officer
#### §§ 222.96-222.101 [Reserved]
!!!"#$%&'(&)(&	(&(


		 !" #$""	%&#'

()*	+*,+*-+*+"./ .



	*+0
1	"1

/
12"	1"./1/ /0/"


/	10

	,  	//
""	

".
"	

$
$3

4444444444444444444444444444444444

5/


#-506#7,,)8

!3	/$0%

(98:2%;1

6
	06-),8)

8,<<(99

."!2

May 23 2018

/s/ Brian F. Kenney

Entered on Docket: May 23, 2018

Case 18-11117-BFK Doc 39 Filed 05/23/18 Entered 05/23/18 15:50:26 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
;"

==#-5>

#-506#7,,)8

!3	/$0%

." .


"	"$/ 


"

?/1//..	:	.3.<9))

*+

==#-5

#-5

!3	/$0%

Case 18-11117-BFK Doc 39 Filed 05/23/18 Entered 05/23/18 15:50:26 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3

	


#-5

!3	/$0%

(98:2%;1

6
	06-),8)


 %@ 0


99A
##,99

-.B/06-)),

	



,),, 

#.
06-)9((

:.&0.

(<!	A%.	#,)

-/.06-))99

Case 18-11117-BFK Doc 39 Filed 05/23/18 Entered 05/23/18 15:50:26 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Land Between The Lakes Advisory Board will hold a meeting on April 21, 2011. Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App 2. The meeting agenda will focus on existing Environmental Education programs and improving engagement with regional school groups. The meeting is open to the public. Written comments are invited and should be sent to William P. Lisowsky, Area Supervisor, Land Between The Lakes, 100 Van Morgan Drive, Golden Pond, KY, 42211 and must be received by April 14, 2011 in order for copies to be provided to the members for this meeting. Board members will review written comments received, and at their request, oral clarification may be requested for a future meeting.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, April 21, 2011 from 9 a.m. to approximately 4 p.m. CST.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Kentucky Dam Village State Resort Park, 113 Administration Drive, Gilbertsville, KY 42044.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Linda L. Taylor, Advisory Board Liaison, Land Between The Lakes, 100 Van Morgan Drive, Golden Pond, KY 42211, 270-924-2002. Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339. This service is available 7 days a week, 24 hours a day.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Board discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Board members.

Dated: March 24, 2011.

William P. Lisowsky,

Area Supervisor, Land Between The Lakes.

[FR Doc. 2011-7424 Filed 3-29-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
§ 645.2 Who is eligible for a grant? The following entities are eligible to apply for a grant to carry out an Upward Bound project: ( a ) An institution of higher education.
( b ) A public or private agency or organization, including a community-based organization with experience in serving disadvantaged youth.
( c ) A secondary school.
( d ) A combination of the types of institutions, agencies, and organizations described in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C 1070a-11 and 1070a-13)
[60 FR 4748, Jan. 24, 1995, as amended at 75 FR 65784, Oct. 26, 2010]
### §2265A. Repeat offenders

(a) Maximum Term of Imprisonment.—The maximum term of imprisonment for a violation of this chapter after a prior domestic violence or stalking offense shall be twice the term otherwise provided under this chapter.

(b) Definition.—For purposes of this section—

(1) the term "prior domestic violence or stalking offense" means a conviction for an offense—

(A) under section 2261, 2261A, or 2262 of this chapter; or

(B) under State or tribal law for an offense consisting of conduct that would have been an offense under a section referred to in subparagraph (A) if the conduct had occurred within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or in interstate or foreign commerce; and

(2) the term "State" means a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 109–162, title I, §115, Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 2988; amended Pub. L. 113–4, title IX, §906(c), Mar. 7, 2013, 127 Stat. 125.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2013—Subsec. (b)(1)(B). Pub. L. 113–4 inserted "or tribal" after "State".
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 81961 / October 26, 2017

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-11814

In the Matter of

COLUMBIA MANAGEMENT 

ADVISORS, INC. and COLUMBIA 

FUNDS DISTRIBUTOR, INC.

Respondents.

ORDER DIRECTING 

DISBURSEMENT

On July 19, 2006, the Commission issued a Notice of Proposed Distribution Plan and 

Opportunity for Comment (“Notice”) in connection with this proceeding (Exchange Act Release 

No. 54175). Comments were received and on April 6, 2007 the Commission issued an order 

approving the proposed plan of distribution with modifications (the “Plan”) (Exchange Act 

Release No. 55598).

The Plan provides that the Fair Fund consisting of $140,000,000 in disgorgement and

civil penalties, plus any accrued interest, be transferred by the Commission to Deutsche Bank for 

distribution by the Fund Administrator to injured investors according to the methodology set 

forth in the Plan. Pursuant to the Plan, and following the issuance of Orders Directing 

Disbursement, the Independent Distribution Consultant (“IDC”) and the Fund Administrator, in 

seven tranches, distributed $150,933,097.36 to injured investors.1 After the distribution of those 

amounts, there is $3,034,205.78 remaining in the Fair Fund. Paragraph 7.8 of the Plan provides

that any additional funds remaining shall be distributed in a manner consistent with the Plan as 

approved, as determined by the IDC. The Plan provides that the Commission will arrange for 

distribution of the Fair Fund when a Payment File listing the payees with the identification 

information required to make the distribution has been received and accepted. The IDC has 

submitted a validated payment file that distributes the remaining funds to the eighteen (18)

mutual funds that were market timed, or to their successors, in proportion to the aggregate 

dilution losses incurred by each such fund, and sends the remaining funds to the U.S. Treasury.

 

1

See Exchange Act Rel. Nos. 55922 (June 18, 2007); 56216 (Aug. 7, 2007); 56857 (Nov.28, 2007); 57422 (Mar. 

3, 2008); 58939 (Nov.13, 2008); 62058 (May 6, 2010); and 65122 (Aug. 12, 2011).
2

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that

A. the Commission staff shall transfer $116,179.71 to Deutsche Bank and the Fund 

Administrator shall distribute this sum, along with $2,888,954.32 in funds held at 

Deutsche Bank for a total distribution of $3,005,134.03, in accordance with the 

Plan; and

B. the remaining funds in the amount of $29,071.75 shall be sent to the U.S.

Treasury. 

By the Commission. 

Brent J. Fields

Secretary
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Beacon Power Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James M. Spiezio, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

November 8,
2007

|/s/JAMES M. SPIEZIOJames M. Spiezio Chief Financial Officer | 
|----------------------------------------------------------- | 

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned officer of Moldflow Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies
that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
December 25, 2004 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit
(the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange
Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A)
shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or
otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

Date: February 2, 2005

                                  /s/ A. ROLAND THOMAS
                                  -----------------------------------------
                                  Name:    A. Roland Thomas
                                  Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer
ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

BRETT STEELE BERRY, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

OP 24-0073 

CAPT. RAY VAUGHN, 

Butte-Silver Bow County Detention Center, 

Respondent. 

FLED 

FEB 2 0 2024 

EsotwatenoGf rewioentawo: Clerk of Suprerne Court 

ORDER 

Brett Steele Berry is detained in the Butte-Silver Bow County Detention Center. He 

petitions this Court for habeas corpus relief because he contends that "the facility is 

overcrowded causing it to admittedly violate [his] civil right to not be burdened in 

practicing [his] religion." Berry states that his detainment impairs his ability to practice 

his religion as a Muslim inmate. Berry states that he does "not believe [his] continued 

incarceration [supersedes his] constitutional right to freedom of religion." Berry asks for 

his immediate release. 

A writ of habeas corpus cannot be the remedy for conditions of confinement or 

constitutional claims. Gates v. Missoula County Comm 'rs, 235 Mont. 261, 262, 766 P.2d 

884, 884-85 (1988). Referring to the habeas corpus statute, this Court opined: "This statute 

allows a prisoner to challenge the legal sufficiency of the cause for incarceration. The 

petitioners do not allege that the cause of their incarceration [is] unlawful. We conclude 

that habeas corpus is not an appropriate remedy." Gates, 235 Mont. at 262, 766 P.2d at 

884-85 (emphasis in original). Berry is not entitled to his immediate release, and this Court 

cannot address his claims through this writ. 

Berry's cause of his incarceration is due to his three pending criminal cases in the 

Butte-Silver Bow County District Court. Berry would have to seek a separate civil action 

02/20/2024

Case Number: OP 24-0073
concerning his claims. Berry has not demonstrated illegal incarceration. Section 

46-22-101(1), MCA. Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that Berry's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and 

DISMISSED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to: the Honorable Kurt Krueger, 

District Court Judge; Robert J. Whelan, District Court Judge; Beth Parks, Clerk of District 

Court, under Cause Nos. DC 21-024, DC 24-009, and DC 24-011, and for distribution to 

counsel of record; Ray Vaughn, Butte-Silver Bow County Sheriff; counsel of record, and 

Brett Steele Berry perso a 

DATED this day of February, 2024. 

Chief Justice 

(0.1 m 

Justices 

2
(No. 74-CC-353

#### Fred Peters Welding Supply Co., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 2, 1974.*

Thomas F. O’Connor, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

OF THE STATE OF TEXAS 

PD-0096-15

MICHAEL JERMAINE WILLIAMS, § 

Appellant § On Petition for Review of 

v. § No. 14-13-00527-CR

§ Court of Appeals 

§ Fourteenth District of Texas 

THE STATE OF TEXAS § 

Appellee 

PETITIONER/APPELLANT’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME 

TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW 

Petitioner/Appellant Michael Jermaine Williams moves for a second extension 

of time to file his petition for discretionary review, under TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b). 

I. LOWER COURT PROCEEDINGS 

Judgment in this case was entered on June 7, 2013. The court of appeals 

affirmed on December 23, 2014. No motion for rehearing was filed. 

II. PROCEEDINGS IN THIS COURT 

Mr. Williams’s petition was due on March 24, 2015. Two previous extensions 

were requested and granted. The petition and appendix were filed today, March 27, 

2015. 

III. REASONS FOR REQUEST 

Since the first extension in this case, counsel has been working hard to catch up 

on her docket after missing nearly a month of work due to recurrent medical 

problems and multiple doctors’ appointments and tests. Counsel reassigned some of 

PD-0096-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 3/27/2015 3:22:06 PM

Accepted 3/31/2015 2:14:48 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
2

her cases to other attorneys in the office, and this month, completed and filed a brief 

in the case of Reginald Turon Hill v. State, Cause No. 14-14-00376-CR, which was 

subject to abatement; and a petition for discretionary review in the case of Charles 

Henry Jones v. State, Cause No. PD-0174-15. Counsel also has deadlines in the next two 

weeks for the following: petition for discretionary review in John Elsworth Combest v. 

State, Cause No. 01-13-00712-CR; brief in In re M.I.S., Cause No. 01-14-00684-CV; 

and brief in Nomathemba Y. Sitawisha v. State, Cause No. 01-14-00848-CR. In the 

exercise of due diligence, counsel could not complete Mr. Williams’ petition by the 

deadline. This motion is not filed for purposes of delay, but so justice may be done.

PRAYER

Mr. Williams respectfully requests that this motion be granted and that the 

Court permit an extension of time until March 27, 2015, to file his petition for 

discretionary review.

Respectfully submitted,

ALEXANDER BUNIN

Chief Public Defender

Harris County Texas 

/s/ Cheri Duncan

______________________________

CHERI DUNCAN

Assistant Public Defender 

Harris County Texas

State Bar No. 06210500

1201 Franklin, 13th Floor

Houston Texas 77002
3

(713) 368-0016

(713) 368-9278 (Fax)

cheri.duncan@pdo.hctx.net

Attorney for Petitioner/Appellant,

MICHAEL JERMAINEWILLIAMS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of Appellant’s Motion to Extend Time to File Appellate 

Brief was served on the State of Texas by electronic delivery to the Appellate Division

of the Harris County District Attorney’s Office and the State Prosecuting Attorney, 

on March 27, 2015.

/s/ Cheri Duncan

_________________________

CHERI DUNCAN
§ 367.67 May an individual's ability to pay be considered in determining his or her participation in the costs of OIB services? ( a ) *Participation of individuals in cost of services.* ( 1 ) A State is neither required to charge nor prohibited from charging consumers for the cost of IL services provided under the Independent Living Services for Older Individuals Who Are Blind program;
( 2 ) If a State charges consumers or allows other service providers to charge for the cost of IL services provided under the Independent Living Services for Older Individuals Who Are Blind program, a State is neither required to nor prohibited from considering the ability of individual consumers to pay for the cost of these services in determining how much a particular consumer must contribute to the costs of a particular service.
( b ) *State policies on cost of services.* If a State chooses to charge or allow other service providers to charge consumers for the cost of IL services provided under the Independent Living Services for Older Individuals Who Are Blind program and if a State chooses to consider and allow other service providers to consider the ability of individual consumers to pay for the cost of IL services provided under the Independent Living Services for Older Individual Who Are Blind program, the State must maintain policies that— ( 1 ) Specify the type of IL services for which costs may be charged and the type of IL services for which a financial need test may be applied;
( 2 ) Explain the method for determining the amount charged for the IL services and how any financial need test will be applied;
( 3 ) Ensure costs are charged uniformly so that all individuals are treated equally;
( 4 ) Ensure that if costs are charged or financial need is considered, the consumer's required participation is not so high that it effectively denies the individual a necessary service;
( 5 ) Require documentation of an individual's participation in the cost of any IL services provided, including the determination of an individual's financial need; and
( 6 ) Provide that individuals who have been determined eligible for Social Security benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act may not be charged any cost to receive IL services under this program.
( c ) *Policies on consumer financial participation.* If a State permits other service providers to charge the costs of IL services provided under the Independent Living Services for Older Individuals Who Are Blind program, or chooses to allow other service providers to consider the ability of individual consumers to contribute to the cost of IL services provided through the Independent Living Services for Older Individuals Who Are Blind program, the State must require that such service providers comply with the State's written policies regarding consumer financial participation in the cost of IL services.
(Authority: Section 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c)).