alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
O pinion issued January 16, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 13 - 00 693 - CV

——————————— AMELIA COLVIN, INDEP ENDENTLY AND AS EXEC UTRIX FOR THE

ESTATE OF FRANCIS CO VIN , Appellant

V. MICHAEL MASCIARELLI , Appellee On Appeal from County Court at Law Number 3 and Probate Court

Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. PR026308 - B

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Amelia Colvin , has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 5, 20.1 ; see also T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § § 51.207 , 51.941(a) , 101.041 ( West 201 3 ); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of2

Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigati on, Misc. Docket No. 07

- 9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in T EX . R. A PP . P . app. A § B(1)

. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not respond. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 5 , 42.3(c). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees

. We dismiss all other pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland , and Brown

.
Exhibit 23(a)


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT 


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement Nos. 33-65720, 33-51215 and 333-00139 of Idaho Power
Company on Form S-3 and Registration Statement No. 33-56071 of
Idaho Power Company on Form S-8 of our report dated January 31,
1996 appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Idaho Power
Company for the year ended December 31, 1995, as amended by 
Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 2.





DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Portland, Oregon
March 25, 1996
Case 18-30835-KRH Doc 126 Filed 09/11/18 Entered 09/11/18 15:25:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 17
Case 18-30835-KRH Doc 126 Filed 09/11/18 Entered 09/11/18 15:25:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 17
Case 18-30835-KRH Doc 126 Filed 09/11/18 Entered 09/11/18 15:25:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 17
Case 18-30835-KRH Doc 126 Filed 09/11/18 Entered 09/11/18 15:25:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 17
Case 18-30835-KRH Doc 126 Filed 09/11/18 Entered 09/11/18 15:25:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 17
Case 18-30835-KRH Doc 126 Filed 09/11/18 Entered 09/11/18 15:25:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 17
Case 18-30835-KRH Doc 126 Filed 09/11/18 Entered 09/11/18 15:25:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 17
Case 18-30835-KRH Doc 126 Filed 09/11/18 Entered 09/11/18 15:25:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 17
Case 18-30835-KRH Doc 126 Filed 09/11/18 Entered 09/11/18 15:25:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 17
Case 18-30835-KRH Doc 126 Filed 09/11/18 Entered 09/11/18 15:25:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 17
Case 18-30835-KRH Doc 126 Filed 09/11/18 Entered 09/11/18 15:25:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 11 of 17
Case 18-30835-KRH Doc 126 Filed 09/11/18 Entered 09/11/18 15:25:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 12 of 17
Case 18-30835-KRH Doc 126 Filed 09/11/18 Entered 09/11/18 15:25:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 13 of 17
Case 18-30835-KRH Doc 126 Filed 09/11/18 Entered 09/11/18 15:25:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 14 of 17
Case 18-30835-KRH Doc 126 Filed 09/11/18 Entered 09/11/18 15:25:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 15 of 17
Case 18-30835-KRH Doc 126 Filed 09/11/18 Entered 09/11/18 15:25:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 16 of 17
Case 18-30835-KRH Doc 126 Filed 09/11/18 Entered 09/11/18 15:25:46 Desc Main

 Document Page 17 of 17
### §577. Public lands in northern Minnesota; withdrawal from entry and appropriation

All public lands of the United States situated north of township 60 north in the Counties of Cook and Lake, State of Minnesota, including the natural shore lines of Lake Superior within such area; all public lands of the United States situated in that part of St. Louis County, State of Minnesota, lying north of a line beginning at the northeast corner of Township 63 north, Range 12 west, 4th P. M., thence westerly along the township line to the southwest corner of Township 64 north, Range 18 west, 4th P. M., thence northerly to the northwest corner of Township 65 north, Range 18 west, 4th P. M., thence westerly to the southwest corner, Township 66 north, Range 21 west, 4th P. M., thence northerly along the Township line to its intersection with the international boundary between the United States and the Dominion of Canada; all public lands of the United States on the shore lines of the lakes and streams forming the international boundary, so far as such lands lie within the areas heretofore described in this section; all public lands of the United States in that part of the Superior National Forest located in Townships 61 and 62, Ranges 12 and 13 west, 4th P. M.; and all public lands of the United States on the shore lines of Burntside Lake and Lake Vermilion, State of Minnesota, are withdrawn from all forms of entry or appropriation under the public land laws of the United States, subject to prior existing legal rights initiated under the public land laws, so long as such claims are maintained as required by the applicable law or laws and subject to such permits and licenses as may be granted or issued by the Department of Agriculture under laws or regulations generally applicable to national forests.

(July 10, 1930, ch. 881, §1, 46 Stat. 1020.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

The act of July 10, 1930, ch. 881, 46 Stat. 1020, which is classified to sections 577 to 577b of this title, is popularly known as the "Shipstead-Nolan Act".

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of all officers, agencies, and employees of Department of Agriculture transferred, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Agriculture by Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1953, §1, eff. June 4, 1953, 18 F.R. 3219, 67 Stat. 633, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Racing Capital, Inc. (the
      “ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date:August
                  14, 2007
              By:
              */s/
                  A. Robert Koveleski*Name:
              A.
                  Robert KoveleskiTitle:
              President
                  and Chief Executive Officer


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to American Racing Capital, Inc. and will
      be
      retained by American Racing Capital, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







EXHIBIT
          32.1-1
Order entered March 17, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00244-CV

DELORIS PHILLIPS, Appellant

V.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-06421-B

ORDER

We DENY appellant’s March 3, 2015 motion to supplement the record on appeal.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
U.S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

Airman Details Report 

Personal Information:

THOMAS MARTIN CICATELLI 

Address is not available

Medical Information:

Medical Class: First, Medical Date: 6/1988

Certificate Information:

Certificate: FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR

Date of Issue: 6/25/1987

Ratings:

FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR

 AIRPLANE SINGLE ENGINE

 INSTRUMENT AIRPLANE

Limits:

VALID ONLY WHEN ACCOMPANIED BY PILOT CERTIFICATE NO. . EXPIRES: 30 

JUN 1989.

FAA Registry - Airmen Inquiry Page 1 of 1

https://amsrvs.registry.faa.gov/airmeninquiry/ 7/7/2015
§ 628.4 What time limitations are placed on grantees applying for another grant? ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, an institution that has received a grant under this part may apply for another grant under this part only after 10 fiscal years have elapsed following the fiscal year appropriation from which the institution's grant was awarded (base fiscal year).
( b ) An institution that has received a grant under this part may apply for another grant under this part after five fiscal years have elapsed following the base fiscal year if the appropriation for this part exceeds $20 million in any of those five fiscal years.
( c ) If an institution has received a grant under this part and the appropriation for this part exceeds $20 million in any of the sixth through tenth fiscal years following the base fiscal year, the institution may apply for another grant under this part in the fiscal year in which the appropriation exceeds $20 million, or any subsequent fiscal year.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1065)
[58 FR 11163, Feb. 23, 1993]
EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectuses
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 33-84620 and
33-61917) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-61973,
33-61971 and 33-61975) of Royce Laboratories, Inc. of our report dated February
28, 1996, appearing on Page F-1 of this Form 10-K.

/s/ PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
--------------------------------
    PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
    Miami, Florida
    March 26, 1996
§ 463.300 What is the one-stop delivery system? ( a ) The one-stop delivery system brings together workforce development, educational, and other human resource services in a seamless customer-focused service delivery network that enhances access to the programs' services and improves long-term employment outcomes for individuals receiving assistance. One-stop partners administer separately funded programs as a set of integrated streamlined services to customers.
( b ) Title I of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) assigns responsibilities at the local, State, and Federal level to ensure the creation and maintenance of a one-stop delivery system that enhances the range and quality of education and workforce development services that employers and individual customers can access.
( c ) The system must include at least one comprehensive physical center in each local area as described in § 463.305.
( d ) The system may also have additional arrangements to supplement the comprehensive center. These arrangements include: ( 1 ) An affiliated site or a network of affiliated sites, where one or more partners make programs, services, and activities available, as described in § 463.310;
( 2 ) A network of eligible one-stop partners, as described in §§ 463.400 through 463.410, through which each partner provides one or more of the programs, services, and activities that are linked, physically or technologically, to an affiliated site or access point that assures customers are provided information on the availability of career services, as well as other program services and activities, regardless of where they initially enter the public workforce system in the local area; and
( 3 ) Specialized centers that address specific needs, including those of dislocated workers, youth, or key industry sectors, or clusters.
( e ) Required one-stop partner programs must provide access to programs, services, and activities through electronic means if applicable and practicable. This is in addition to providing access to services through the mandatory comprehensive physical one-stop center and any affiliated sites or specialized centers. The provision of programs and services by electronic methods such as Web sites, telephones, or other means must improve the efficiency, coordination, and quality of one-stop partner services. Electronic delivery must not replace access to such services at a comprehensive one-stop center or be a substitute to making services available at an affiliated site if the partner is participating in an affiliated site. Electronic delivery systems must be in compliance with the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of WIOA sec. 188 and its implementing regulations at 29 CFR part 38.
( f ) The design of the local area's one-stop delivery system must be described in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) executed with the one-stop partners, described in § 463.500.
WATSON WYATT & COMPANY HOLDINGS
WATSON WYATT & COMPANY HOLDINGS
2000 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
 Purpose
  Committee .
 Administration
 Procedures
 Interpretation
 Delegation




---



##### 



Shares Subject to Grants
 Number of Shares
 Character of Shares
 Reservation of Shares
 Employees Eligible
  Grant of Options
 Option Price .




---



##### 



Stock Appreciation Rights .
 Exercisability and Duration of Awards .
 Determination of Committee; Acceleration
 Automatic Termination .




---



##### 



Exercise of Awards .




---



##### 



Non-Transferability of Awards
 Withholding Tax
 Restrictions on Delivery and Sale of Shares




---



##### 



Change in Control
           Right to Terminate Employment




---



##### 



Transfer, Leave of Absence .
 Adjustment Upon Changes in Capitalization, etc. provided, however
   Cancellation of Awards .
   Expiration, Amendment and Termination of the Plan




---



##### 



provided, however
 Governing Law
 Effective Date of Plan
 Special Provisions Applicable to Awards in Certain Countries.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated August
4, 1995, relating to the June 30, 1995, financial statements of Larson Davis
incorporated, appearing in the annual report of Larson Davis incorporated on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996, into the following registration
statements filed on behalf of Larson Davis incorporated:  registration statement
on Form S-8, SEC File No. 33-35751, filed July 5, 1990; registration statement
on Form S-8, SEC File No. 33-44784, filed December 30, 1991; registration
statement on Form S-3, SEC No. 333-1505, effective as of March 22, 1996; and
registration statement on Form S-3, SEC No. 333-6527, effective as of August 2,
1996.


/s/ Pritchett, Siler & Hardy, P.C.


PRITCHETT, SILER & HARDY, P.C.

Salt Lake City, Utah
March 26, 1997
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 527

 532

 535

 540

 546

 553

 559

 559

 564

 564

 566

 571

 575

 578

 582

 583

 606

 568

 578

 595

 590

 589

 592

 602

 611

 623

 626

 618

 593

 553

 508

 521

 523

 525

 535

 542

 546

 545

 549

 552

 560

 563

 570

 569

 573

 577

 540

 515

 524

 508

 500

 496

 469

 469

 457

 453

 448

 404

 374

 357

 521

 529

 532

 535

 541

 548

 551

 554

 557

 560

 563

 568

 572

 576

 577

 580

 570

 550

 560

 568

 560

 547

 539

 545

 544

 554

 554

 526

 496

 474

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 338

 343

 345

 347

 350

 355

 357

 358

 360

 362

 364

 367

 369

 372

 373

 374

 368

 356

 362

 367

 362

 354

 349

 353

 352

 358

 358

 341

 323

 309

TOTAL 16,451

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
g:\blm\buttermp\ams\FinalFigures\Fig2-29_AbandonedMineLnd8511.mxd 

Cascad

County
 

!

i ! ! 

!

Lew s and Clark ! 

!

County 

! ! 

! ! 

! ! ! 

! !!

! 

!

! ! 

Meaghe Powell ! ! !

! !!!!! !

!

!

!! ! !! County 

£ Hel

County 

!!!!!!!!

East Hel

! 

ena

Granit 12 !

!

! 

¤ ! ena Coun ty !!

e 

!

! 

! !

!! !	 Wheatl ! ! 

! !	 Coun

and

§

! 

!!

! 

 ̈¦ ! 15 

!

ty 

!!

! !!

!

! ! 

!! ! !!! Townsend ! !	 £ ! !!

! ! !! ! !

!!! !!!!

! ! 12 !! !!!! ! ! !! !!!

!

!!

! 

!! !! ! ! ¤ !

Anaconda§ ̈¦ ! ! 

!

!! ! !!

!! !! ! County 90	 

! Boulder !! Broadwater 

! ! ! !! ! Jefferson !

Deerl

!!

!

! 

!

!

! !
 

Coun

odge County 

!
 

ty Butte 

! 

Gallati 

County 

!

!

! 

!!!

!

!! 

Coun ty

n 

ty 

!!!!!

S l !!!

! Wh t !

!!

!

! ll !	 Swee

Coun

t Gras i verbow ! i eha Three Forks 

! ! § ̈¦ !	 Belgrade ! ! 15 

! 

! 

! ! !!!!! Park ! !! !! !!	 !!!!!!
 !!!!
 

!

!!!

!!

Bozeman § ̈¦

County

Livingston 90 

Big Sky !!!

!

! Stillwat 

Madi

Coun ty

er 

Beaverhead

ty County	 Coun

son

Gardiner 

Yellowstone National

Park 

West Yellowstone 

Clar

County Freemont

County
 

! Abandoned Mine Sites 

BLM Ownership	 Abandoned Mine Land Sites

0 Miles 25 Butte Field Office - EIS 

No warranty is made by the Bureau of RMP Planning Area, Montana

Land Management (BLM) for use of FIGURE 2-29 data for purposes not intended by BLM. WYOMING IDAHO 

MONTANA 

IDAHO 

I
Exhibit 23(a)

                        Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements Nos.
33-20842,  33-20859,  33-86232, 33-86236,  333-06371,  333-04953,  333-19833 and
333-45255  of Cavalier  Homes,  Inc. on form S-8,  and to the  incorporation  by
reference in Registration  Statements Nos.  33-62487 (as amended),  33-63060 (as
amended), 33-86348 (as amended),  333-18213 (as amended), 333-00607 (as amended)
and 333-48111 of Cavalier  Homes,  Inc. on Form S-3 of our report dated February
17, 1998 (March 13, 1998 as to the amendment to the Credit Facility described in
Note 5),  appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cavalier  Homes,  Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 1997.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Birmingham, Alabama
March 30, 1998
1 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

In re: )

)

DARRIN Z BURTON, ) Case No. 19-12225-BFK

) Chapter 13

Debtor. )

ORDER FOR DEBTOR TO APPEAR AND 

SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD 

NOT BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE

The Debtor filed this case as a voluntary Chapter 13 case on July 5, 2019. Docket No. 1. This is 

the Debtor’s sixth bankruptcy case since 2010 (eighth case overall), one filed under Chapter 7 and five

under Chapter 13. The Court, therefore, will set this case for a hearing on why this case should not be 

dismissed with prejudice for up to one year. It is therefore

ORDERED:

1. This case is set for a hearing on Thursday, August 8, 2019, at 1:30 p.m., at 200 S.

Washington St., Alexandria, VA 22314, for the Debtor to show cause, if any, why this case should not be 

dismissed with prejudice.

2. The Clerk will mail a copy of this Order to the Debtor and will provide the Chapter 13

Trustee with cm-ecf notice of its entry.

Date: _____________________ ________________________________

Brian F. Kenney

Alexandria, Virginia United States Bankruptcy Judge

Copies to:

Darrin Z Burton 

18 Mill Springs Rd

Fredericksburg, VA 22406-6000

Chapter 13 Debtor

Earl J. Oberbauer, Jr.

9329 Battle St.

Manassas, VA 20110

Counsel for Chapter 13 Debtor

Jul 15 2019 /s/ Brian F. Kenney

Entered on Docket: July 15, 2019

Case 19-12225-BFK Doc 12 Filed 07/15/19 Entered 07/15/19 16:25:07 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2 

Thomas P. Gorman

300 N. Washington St. Ste. 400

Alexandria, VA 22314

Chapter 13 Trustee

Case 19-12225-BFK Doc 12 Filed 07/15/19 Entered 07/15/19 16:25:07 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
§ 33.34 Evidence. ( a ) The ALJ shall determine the admissibility of evidence.
( b ) Except as provided in this part, the ALJ is not bound by the Federal Rules of Evidence. However, the ALJ may apply the Federal Rules of Evidence if appropriate, *e.g.,* to exclude unreliable evidence.
( c ) The ALJ shall exclude irrelevant and immaterial evidence.
( d ) Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighted by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by considerations of undue delay or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.
( e ) Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if it is privileged under Federal law.
( f ) Evidence concerning offers of compromise or settlement are inadmissible to the extend provided in Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
( g ) The ALJ shall permit the parties to introduce rebuttal witnesses and evidence.
( h ) All Documents and other evidence offered or taken for the record must be open to examination by all parties, unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ pursuant to § 33.24.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3803(f)(g)(2)(E))
#### B. F. Minzer v. Willman Mercantile Company.

Filed December 19, 1899.

No. 9,067.

1. Pleading: New Matter in Answer: Reply: Trial: Review. If, during the trial of an action, new matter pleaded in the answer is treated by the parties as denied -or placed in issue, it will be so considered in this court, although no, or an imperfect, reply was filed.

*4113. Failure to File Instructions: Exceptions: Review. The charge of a trial court should be filed with the clerk before read to the jury; but that it was not done is not available error, unless the complainant excepted to such omission at the time.

3. Action on Account: Sueeiciency oe Petition. Objections to the petition herein *held*not well grounded, and not available.

Error from the district court of Webster county. Tried below before Beall, J.

*Affirmed.*

*James McNeny*and *Ohaney & Walden,*for plaintiff in error.

*James S. Gilliam*and *Robert T. Potter, contra.*

Harrison, C. J.

In this action in the district court of Webster county the defendant in error declared upon an account and demanded judgment against the plaintiff in error for the stated sum. The answer admitted the existence of the account, and alleged matters of counter-claim. There was filed what was no doubt intended for a reply. A trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendant in error.

It is urged for the plaintiff in error that there was no reply, and that the pleas of new matters in the answer were admitted. What was evidently intended for a reply was filed, and appears in the record as follows: “Comes now the plaintiff, and denies each and every allegation of new matter therein contained.” We need not consider the availability of this as a plea to the answer, for the reason that, to the extent it is disclosed by the record, the parties participated in a trial and treated the averments of the answer as denied, and, under such circumstances, the objection that no reply was filed was waived. See *Western Horse & Cattle Co. v. Timm,*23 Nebr., 526; *Missouri P. R. Co. v. Palmer,*55 Nebr., 559.

It is argued that the instructions were not filed with the clerk. It is not shown that the plaintiff in error ob*412jected to the Instructions on the ground now urged; and this renders the complaint at this time unavailable. See *Fry v. Tilton,*11 Nebr., 456.

It is also contended that the petition was defective, for that in the copy of the account attached thereto there was no dollar mark at head of any column or at any place in the account. While it is true that there was not a dollar mark in or on the copy of the account, some of the columns of figures were made in such manner and used in connection with terms which clearly and unmistakably indicated the import of the figures. Moreover, the account, as shown by the copy, was admitted in the answer. It follows that the judgment of the district court will be.

Appirmed.