alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 668.237 Accreditation requirements. ( a ) To be an eligible program under § 668.236, a prison education program must meet the requirements of the institution's accrediting agency or State approval agency.
( b ) In order for any prison education program to qualify as an eligible program, the accrediting agency must have— ( 1 ) Evaluated at least the first prison education program at the first two additional locations to ensure the institution's ability to offer and implement the program and that the program meets the agency's accreditation standards, and included it in the institution's grant of accreditation or pre-accreditation;
( 2 ) Evaluated the first additional prison education program offered by a new method of delivery to ensure the institution's ability to offer and implement the program and that the program meets the agency's standards, and included it in the institution's grant of accreditation or pre-accreditation;
( 3 ) Performed a site visit as soon as practicable but no later than one year after initiating the prison education program at the first two additional locations; and
( 4 ) If the requirements under § 668.236(a)(3) are satisfied, reviewed and approved the methodology for how the institution, in collaboration with the oversight entity, made the determination that the prison education program meets the same standards as substantially similar programs that are not prison education programs at the institution.
[87 FR 66426, Oct. 28, 2022, as amended at 88 FR 18255, Mar. 28, 2023]
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL

3 TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee

4 under POOLING AND SERVICING

5 AGREEMENT DATED AS OF 

6 JUNE 1, 2007 SECURITIZED ASSET 

7 BACKED RECEIVABLES LLC 

8 TRUST 2007-BR5,

9 Plaintiff-Appellee,

10 v. No. 34,947

11 SIMONE M. ROBINSON-VANN and

12 CURTIS VANN, 

13 Defendants-Appellants.

14 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY

15 Valerie Huling, District Judge

16 Rose L. Brand & Associates PC

17 Eraina Edwards

18 Albuquerque, NM

19 for Appellee

20 JRSPC, LLC

21 Joshua R. Simms

22 Albuquerque, NM
2

1 for Appellants

2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

3 HANISEE, Judge.

4 {1} Defendants-Appellants Simone M. Robinson-Vann and Curtis Vann

5 (Appellants) appeal from the district court’s order denying their motion to dismiss for

6 lack of jurisdiction. [RP 157, 229; DS unnumbered 2] Summary affirmance was

7 proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. Plaintiff8 Appellee has filed a response in support of our notice of proposed disposition. No

9 memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so

10 has expired.

11 {2} Accordingly, we affirm.

12 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

13 _____________________________ 

14 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 

15 WE CONCUR:

16 __________________________________

17 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

18 __________________________________
3

1 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
§ 75.251 Budget periods. ( a ) The Secretary usually approves a budget period of not more than 12 months, even if the project has a multi-year project period.
( b ) If the Secretary approves a multi-year project period, the Secretary: ( 1 ) Makes a grant to the project for the initial budget period; and
( 2 ) Indicates his or her intention to make contination awards to fund the remainder of the project period.
( c ) If the Secretary funds a multi-year data collection period, the Secretary may fund the data collection period through separate budget periods and fund those budget periods in the same manner as those periods are funded during the project period.
[45 FR 22497, Apr. 3, 1980, as amended at 78 FR 49354, Aug. 13, 2013] (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
Exhibit 99(b)


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Bellcrest Homes, Inc.
Millen, Georgia


We have audited the  accompanying statement of  income of  Bellcrest Homes, Inc.
for  the  year  ended  December  31,  1995.  This  statement  of  income  is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express  an
opinion on this statement of income based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain  reasonable
assurance   about   whether   the  statement  of  income  is  free  of  material
misstatement. An audit includes  examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the  statement  of income. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting  principles used  and  significant  estimates  made  by
management, as well as  evaluating  the overall presentation of the statement of
income.   We  believe  that  our  audit  of  the  statement of income provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the  statement of income  referred  to above presents fairly, in
all material respects,  the  results of  the operations of Bellcrest Homes, Inc.
for the  year ended  December  31,  1995, in  conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.


/s/ Alday, Tillman, Wright & Giles, P.C.
------------------------------------------
Alday, Tillman, Wright & Giles, P.C.
Valdosta, Georgia

January 23, 1996
Case 16-71477-SCS Doc 21 Filed 06/27/16 Entered 06/27/16 09:40:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 14
Case 16-71477-SCS Doc 21 Filed 06/27/16 Entered 06/27/16 09:40:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 14
Case 16-71477-SCS Doc 21 Filed 06/27/16 Entered 06/27/16 09:40:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 14
Case 16-71477-SCS Doc 21 Filed 06/27/16 Entered 06/27/16 09:40:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 14
Case 16-71477-SCS Doc 21 Filed 06/27/16 Entered 06/27/16 09:40:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 14
Case 16-71477-SCS Doc 21 Filed 06/27/16 Entered 06/27/16 09:40:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 14
Case 16-71477-SCS Doc 21 Filed 06/27/16 Entered 06/27/16 09:40:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 14
Case 16-71477-SCS Doc 21 Filed 06/27/16 Entered 06/27/16 09:40:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 14
Case 16-71477-SCS Doc 21 Filed 06/27/16 Entered 06/27/16 09:40:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 14
Case 16-71477-SCS Doc 21 Filed 06/27/16 Entered 06/27/16 09:40:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 14
Case 16-71477-SCS Doc 21 Filed 06/27/16 Entered 06/27/16 09:40:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 11 of 14
Case 16-71477-SCS Doc 21 Filed 06/27/16 Entered 06/27/16 09:40:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 12 of 14
Case 16-71477-SCS Doc 21 Filed 06/27/16 Entered 06/27/16 09:40:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 13 of 14
Case 16-71477-SCS Doc 21 Filed 06/27/16 Entered 06/27/16 09:40:40 Desc Main

 Document Page 14 of 14
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                   3,735,115
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                             0
<INVENTORY>                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         5,215,847
<PP&E>                                   36,476
<DEPRECIATION>                           (8,484)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           5,568,839
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    181,758
<BONDS>                                  0
<COMMON>                                 6,326
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<OTHER-SE>                               (161,285)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             5,568,839
<SALES>                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         147,944
<CGS>                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            12,089,626
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         21,665
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         (31,663)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       31,811
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (11,995,158)
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (11,995,158)
<DISCONTINUED>                           3,290,778
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                             (8,704,380)
<EPS-BASIC>                            (1.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            (1.53)



</TABLE>
### §503. Postmarking stamps

Whoever forges or counterfeits any postmarking stamp, or impression thereof with intent to make it appear that such impression is a genuine postmark, or makes or knowingly uses or sells, or possesses with intent to use or sell, any forged or counterfeited postmarking stamp, die, plate, or engraving, or such impression thereof, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 713; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §349a (Aug. 26, 1935, ch. 692, 49 Stat. 866).

Minor changes in phraseology were made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000".
(No. 74-CC-76

#### Jose A. Gonzalez, M.D., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 31, 1974.*

Jose A. Gonzalez, M.D., Claimant, pro se.

*211William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 565

 554

 583

 613

 648

 633

 627

 645

 674

 675

 624

 562

 535

 573

 476

 468

 475

 499

 499

 495

 499

 485

 450

 508

 523

 591

 568

 548

 552

 410

 412

 410

 400

 401

 412

 403

 409

 402

 392

 384

 382

 376

 388

 412

 416

 417

 424

 431

 429

 457

 443

 444

 451

 457

 489

 472

 466

 503

 471

 477

 477

 475

 495

 510

 518

 526

 504

 507

 458

 434

 420

 447

 435

 444

 438

 450

 460

 454

 475

 462

 446

 487

 501

 544

 530

 506

 533

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 5, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 307

 311

 311

 310

 322

 331

 336

 341

 327

 329

 299

 284

 276

 292

 285

 290

 287

 294

 300

 297

 310

 302

 292

 317

 326

 352

 344

 329

 345

TOTAL 13,884

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Altrimega   Health
Corporation  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  each of the  undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates
indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition and results of operation of the
Company.


Date:             November 18, 2003              By:    /s/ John Gand
                                                        -----------------------
                                                 Name:  John Gandy
                                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer


         A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906,
or other document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise adopting the
signature  that  appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this
written  statement  required by Section  906,  has been  provided to Altrimega
Health  Corporation and will be retained by Altrimega  Health  Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §3151. Refund of forfeited bail

Appropriations available to refund money erroneously received and deposited in the Treasury are available to refund any part of forfeited bail deposited into the Treasury and ordered remitted under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

(Added Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7084(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4408.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, referred to in text, are set out in the Appendix to this title.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3151, added Pub. L. 89–465, §3(a), June 22, 1966, 80 Stat. 216, related to contempt power of courts, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §203(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1976.
Opinion issued February 14, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-10-01153-CV

———————————

KAREN KRISTINE SILVIO, Appellant

V.

MICHAEL B. NEWMAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 945,526

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Karen Kristine Silvio, has neither paid the required filing fee for 

this appeal nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs 

must pay—at the time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees are required by 

statute or Supreme Court order.”), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing 

indigence); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (West Supp. 2012), 

§.51.941(a) (West 2005), § 101.041 (West Supp. 2012) (listing fees in court of 

appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and 

the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 

Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A 

§ B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals). 

The filing fee was first due on December 15, 2010. On October 12, 2012, the 

Court issued an order notifying appellant that she had not established indigence and 

that, unless the filing fee was paid within 10 days, the appeal was subject to 

dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3 (allowing 

involuntary dismissal of case). Appellant filed a response in which she again 

asserts that she is indigent. 

Because appellant has not paid the required filing fee as directed, we dismiss 

the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). All other

pending motions are dismissed as moot. 
3

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.
(No. 78-CC-1048

#### Charles F. Kelly, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed September 29, 1978.*

This matter comes before the Court on a motion filed by Respondent to dismiss the complaint.

As basis for said motion, Respondent calls attention to the fact that the accident giving rise to the present cause of action occurred on December 1,1976, as set forth in the complaint.

Statutory notice was filed ten months and six days after the accident occurred.

Respondent’s motion to dismiss sets forth as follows:

> “That Ill. Rev. Stat. Ch. 37, Para. 439.22-1,1977 provides in pertinent part that:

> “Actions for personal injuries — Notice — Contents Para. 22-1. Within six months from the date that such an injury was received or such cause of *781action accrued, any person who is about to commence any action in the Court of Claims against the State of Illinois... for damages on account of any injury to his person shall file (a Notice of Intent to Sue)...”

Respondent further sets forth:

> “That Ill. Rev. Stat. Ch. 37, Para. 439-22-2,1977 provides in pertinent part that:

> “If the notice provided for by Section 22-1 is not filed as provided in that Section, any such action commenced against the State of Illinois... shall be dismissed and the person to whom any such cause of action accrued for any personal injury shall be forever barred from further action in the Court of Claims for such personal injury...”

The Court finds that Claimant has failed to comply with the statutory notice requirement, motion to dismiss is granted and said cause dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 779

 798

 810

 821

 820

 802

 770

 750

 754

 775

 748

 832

 817

 520

 816

 828

 709

 798

 781

 816

 817

 818

 680

 805

 724

 792

 777

 759

 716

 741

 689

 492

 491

 490

 512

 515

 520

 517

 520

 522

 516

 517

 515

 527

 492

 514

 513

 512

 544

 554

 562

 582

 645

 601

 696

 661

 675

 736

 684

 642

 667

 627

 597

 589

 591

 605

 623

 622

 636

 627

 603

 594

 571

 604

 657

 513

 631

 652

 554

 667

 605

 675

 684

 730

 624

 769

 679

 740

 753

 733

 687

 716

 654

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 16, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 385

 380

 381

 390

 401

 400

 409

 403

 389

 383

 369

 389

 422

 333

 406

 419

 358

 428

 390

 433

 439

 467

 402

 491

 436

 473

 481

 469

 441

 458

 420

TOTAL 19,985

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
### **CHAPTER 403—JUVENILE DELINQUENCY**

Sec.
5031.
Definitions.
5032.
Delinquency proceedings in district courts; transfer for criminal prosecution.
5033.
Custody prior to appearance before magistrate judge.
5034.
Duties of magistrate judge.
5035.
Detention prior to disposition.
5036.
Speedy trial.
5037.
Dispositional hearing.
5038.
Use of juvenile records.
5039.
Commitment.
5040.
Support.
5041.
Repealed.
5042.
Revocation of probation.
5043.
Juvenile solitary confinement.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–391, title VI, §613(b), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5249, added item 5043.

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXV, §3599H, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4932, substituted "probation" for "Probation" in item 5042.

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §214(d), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2014, substituted "Repealed" for "Parole" in item 5041, and "Revocation of Probation" for "Revocation of parole or probation" in item 5042.

**1974**—Pub. L. 93–415, title V, §513, Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1138, substituted "Delinquency proceedings in district courts; transfer for criminal prosecution." for "Proceeding against juvenile delinquent." in item 5032; "Custody prior to appearance before magistrate." for "Jurisdiction; written consent; jury trial precluded." in item 5033; "Duties of magistrate." for "Probation; commitment to custody of Attorney General; support." in item 5034; "Detention prior to disposition." for "Arrest, detention and bail." in item 5035; "Speedy trial." for "Contracts for support; payment." in item 5036; "Dispositional hearing." for "Parole." in item 5037; and added items 5038 to 5042.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Words "magistrate judge" substituted for "magistrate" in items 5033 and 5034 pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as a note under section 631 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### Repeals

Pub. L. 93–415, title V, §513, Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1138, cited as a credit in an amendment to this analysis, was repealed by Pub. L. 115–385, title III, §307, Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5152.
§ 606.31 How does a grantee maintain its eligibility? ( a ) A grantee shall maintain its eligibility under the requirements in § 606.2, except for § 606.2(a)(3) and (4), for the duration of the grant period.
( b ) The Secretary reviews an institution's application for a continuation award to ensure that— ( 1 ) The institution continues to meet the eligibility requirements described in paragraph (a) of this section; and
( 2 ) The institution is making substantial progress toward achieving the objectives described in its grant application including, if applicable, the institution's success in institutionalizing practices and improvements developed under the grant.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1101 *et seq.*)
### §459j–5. Canaveral National Seashore Advisory Commission

#### (a) Establishment; duties; termination; membership; term of members; appointment; Chairman

There is hereby established the Canaveral National Seashore Advisory Commission which shall consult and advise with the Secretary on all matters of planning, development, and operation of the seashore and shall provide such other advice and assistance as may be useful in carrying out the purposes of sections 459j to 459j–8 of this title. The Commission shall terminate ten years after the date the seashore is established pursuant to sections 459j to 459j–8 of this title, unless extended by the Congress. The Commission shall be composed of six members who shall serve for terms of two years. Members shall be appointed by the Secretary, one of whom he shall designate as Chairman, in the following manner:

(1) one member from each county in which the seashore is located, to be selected from recommendations made by the county commission in each county;

(2) two members representing the State of Florida who shall be selected from recommendations made by the Governor of Florida; and

(3) two members representing the general public: Provided, That one member shall be appointed from each county in which the seashore is located.

#### (b) Meetings; vacancies

After the Secretary designates the member to be Chairman, the Commission may meet as often as necessary at the call of the Chairman or of the Secretary, or upon petition of a majority of the members of the Commission. Any vacancy in the Commission shall be filled in the same manner as the original appointment was made.

#### (c) Compensation; payment of expenses upon vouchers

Members of the Commission shall serve without compensation, as such, but the Secretary may pay, upon vouchers signed by the Chairman, the expenses reasonably incurred by the Commission and its members in carrying out their responsibilities under this section.

(Pub. L. 93–626, §6, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2124; Pub. L. 94–398, Sept. 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 1204.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–398 substituted "six members" for "five members" in introductory provisions and substituted "two" for "one" and inserted requirement relating to residency of each member in cl. (3).
### Part B—Temporary Entry of Business Persons

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 116–113, title V, §503(a), (e), Jan. 29, 2020, 134 Stat. 71, 72, struck out "[reserved]" at end of part heading and reenacted part heading without change.