alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

                            COLLEGE PARTNERSHIP, INC.

                                  CERTIFICATION

     In connection with the periodic report of College Partnership, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Douglas C. Rother, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.




Date: June 16, 2003                          /s/  Douglas C. Rother
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                  Douglas C. Rother
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 662

 666

 673

 666

 679

 680

 688

 701

 698

 691

 694

 693

 700

 701

 683

 684

 687

 716

 678

 738

 743

 728

 731

 743

 743

 750

 786

 816

 844

 891

 917

 641

 645

 647

 647

 653

 653

 657

 660

 662

 664

 661

 658

 654

 655

 653

 657

 659

 662

 672

 676

 680

 684

 694

 702

 706

 710

 716

 723

 731

 724

 746

 649

 652

 656

 652

 659

 660

 668

 671

 674

 672

 669

 667

 664

 662

 661

 665

 667

 680

 674

 690

 693

 696

 702

 710

 717

 722

 734

 748

 760

 783

 803

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:November 2, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 417

 419

 421

 419

 423

 424

 429

 431

 433

 431

 429

 428

 426

 425

 424

 427

 428

 436

 433

 442

 444

 446

 450

 455

 459

 462

 470

 478

 486

 500

 512

TOTAL 21,380

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
(No. 6758

#### Data Products Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Revenue, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September*7, *1972.*

Data Products Corporation, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
### §3585. Calculation of a term of imprisonment

(a) Commencement of Sentence.—A sentence to a term of imprisonment commences on the date the defendant is received in custody awaiting transportation to, or arrives voluntarily to commence service of sentence at, the official detention facility at which the sentence is to be served.

(b) Credit for Prior Custody.—A defendant shall be given credit toward the service of a term of imprisonment for any time he has spent in official detention prior to the date the sentence commences—

(1) as a result of the offense for which the sentence was imposed; or

(2) as a result of any other charge for which the defendant was arrested after the commission of the offense for which the sentence was imposed;

that has not been credited against another sentence.

(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §212(a)(2), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2001.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Nov. 1, 1987, and applicable only to offenses committed after the taking effect of this section, see section 235(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as a note under section 3551 of this title.
### §3434. Presence of defendant—(Rule)

#### See Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

Right of defendant to be present generally; corporation; waiver, Rule 43.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 831.)
(No. 74-CC-228

#### Churchill Chemical Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Corrections, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 20, 1974.*

Churchill Chemical Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
̄ 0 5 10 20

Miles

Main Roads

Non-National Forest System Lands

Forest Boundary

Legend

April, 2012

Sundance

Custer

Rapid

City

Deadwood

Lead

Sturgis

Hot

Springs

Edgemont

Wind Cave

National Park

Newcastle

Hill

City

Sand Creek

Beaver

Park

Cook

Lake

Rochford

Custer

State Park

Wilderness

Spearfish

§ ̈¦I-90

£¤16

Mountain Pine Beetle Response Project

Management Areas Map

Black Hills National Forest

§ ̈¦I-90

§ ̈¦I-90

3385

3385

3385

316

316

316

Management Areas considered for this project

3.31 Backcountry Motorized

3.32 Backcountry Non-Motorized

4.1 Limited Motorized & Forest Production

4.2A Spearfish Canyon

5.1 Resource Production

5.1A Southern Hills Unsuitable Base

5.2A Fort Meade Watershed

5.4 Big Game Winter Emphasis

5.43 Big Game & Resource Production

5.6 Forest Products, Recreation & Big Game

8.2 Developed Recreation Complexes

3.31

5.1

4.1

4.2A

5.1

5.1

5.1A

5.1A

5.2A

5.4

5.4

5.4

5.43

5.6

5.4

3.31

5.1

4.1

4.1
### Part I—Miscellaneous
§ 33.30 The hearing and burden of proof. ( a ) The ALJ shall conduct a hearing on the record in order to determine whether the defendant is liable for a civil penalty or assessment under § 33.3 and, if so, the appropriate amount of the civil penalty or assessment considering any aggravating or mitigating factors.
( b ) The Department shall prove a defendant's liability and any aggravating factors by a preponderance of the evidence.
( c ) The defendant shall prove any affirmative defenses and any mitigating factors by a preponderance of the evidence.
( d ) The hearing must be open to the public unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ for good cause shown.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3803 (f), (g)(2))
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 512

 453

 442

 441

 446

 440

 422

 416

 417

 449

 448

 432

 431

 442

 424

 428

 428

 433

 440

 449

 463

 476

 448

 444

 472

 485

 485

 491

 481

 456

 450

 425

 407

 418

 424

 409

 380

 378

 395

 409

 416

 385

 386

 394

 403

 381

 381

 397

 397

 399

 400

 402

 404

 405

 407

 422

 456

 430

 435

 428

 490

 439

 425

 429

 434

 422

 404

 402

 406

 427

 431

 409

 403

 414

 411

 402

 403

 408

 412

 419

 420

 428

 418

 419

 439

 456

 472

 463

 458

 443

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 319

 287

 279

 281

 284

 277

 266

 264

 267

 280

 282

 269

 265

 272

 270

 264

 265

 268

 271

 275

 276

 281

 274

 275

 287

 298

 308

 302

 299

 290

TOTAL 12,806

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 64 (Monday, April 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18512-18513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7873]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Ouachita-Ozark Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Ouachita-Ozark Resource Advisory Committee will meet in 
Barling, Arkansas. The committee is

[[Page 18513]]

meeting as authorized under the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-343) and in compliance with the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act. The purpose is to discuss general 
information, review proposals, review updates on current or completed 
Title II projects, and to set next meeting agenda.

DATES: The meeting will be held on May 3, 2011, beginning at 6 p.m. and 
ending at approximately 9 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Janet Huckabee Arkansas 
River Valley Nature Center, 8300 Wells Lake Road, Barling, Arkansas.
    Written comments should be sent to: Caroline Mitchell, Committee 
Coordinator, USDA, Ouachita National Forest, P.O. Box 1270, Hot 
Springs, AR 71902. Comments may also be sent via e-mail to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7e1d1f0c111217101b13170a1d161b12123e180d50181b1a500b0d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aac9cbd8c5c6c3c4cfc7c3dec9c2cfc6c6eaccd984cccfce84dfd9">[email protected]</span></a> or via facsimile to 501-321-5399.
    All comments, including names and addresses when provided, are 
placed in the record and are available for public inspection and 
copying. The public may inspect comments received at 100 Reserve 
Street, Hot Springs, AR 71901. Visitors are encouraged to call ahead to 
501-321-5202 to facilitate entry into the building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caroline Mitchell, Committee 
Coordinator, USDA, Ouachita National Forest, P.O. Box 1270, Hot 
Springs, AR 71902. (501-321-5318). Individuals who use 
telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 
p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Committee 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff, Committee members, and 
elected officials. However, persons who wish to bring matters to the 
attention of the Committee may file written statements with the 
Committee staff before or after the meeting. Individuals wishing to 
speak or propose agenda items must send their names and proposals to 
Bill Pell, DFO, P.O. Box 1270, Hot Springs, AR 71902.

    Dated: March 29, 2011.
Bill Pell,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 2011-7873 Filed 4-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 660.2 Who is eligible to apply for grants under this program?

Public and private agencies, organizations, and institutions, and individuals are eligible to apply for grants under this part.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1125)
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

         I, William Smith, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Adsero Corporation.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have;

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this
quarterly report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

         Date: May 24, 2005             /s/ William Smith
                                        -----------------
                                        William Smith
                                        Principal Accounting and
                                        Financial Officer
### SUBCHAPTER I—APPROVAL OF, AND GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO, THE AGREEMENT
§ 75.262 Conversion of a grant or a cooperative agreement. ( a ) ( 1 ) The Secretary may convert a grant to a cooperative agreement or a cooperative agreement to a grant at the time a continuation award is made under § 75.253.
( 2 ) In deciding whether to convert a grant to a cooperative agreement or a cooperative agreement to a grant, the Secretary considers the factors included in § 75.200(b) (4) and (5).
( b ) The Secretary and a recipient may agree at any time to convert a grant to a cooperative agreement or a cooperative agreement to a grant, subject to the factors included in § 75.200(b) (4) and (5).
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
[57 FR 30339, July 8, 1992]
§ 75.562 Indirect cost rates for educational training projects. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70330 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) Educational training grants provide funding for training or other educational services. Examples of the work supported by training grants are summer institutes, training programs for selected participants, the introduction of new or expanded courses, and similar instructional undertakings that are separately budgeted and accounted for by the sponsoring institution. These grants do not usually support activities involving research, development, and dissemination of new educational materials and methods. Training grants largely implement previously developed materials and methods and require no significant adaptation of techniques or instructional services to fit different circumstances.
( b ) The Secretary uses the definition in paragraph (a) to determine which grants are educational training grants.
( c ) ( 1 ) Indirect cost reimbursement on a training grant is limited to the recipient's actual indirect costs, as determined in its negotiated indirect cost rate agreement, or eight percent of a modified total direct cost base, whichever amount is less. Note to paragraph ( c
)(1):
If the grantee did not have a federally recognized indirect cost rate agreement on the date the training grant was awarded, indirect cost recovery is also limited to the amount authorized under § 75.560(d)(3).
( 2 ) For the purposes of this section, a modified total direct cost base consists of total direct costs minus the following: ( i ) The amount of each sub-award in excess of $25,000.
( ii ) Stipends.
( iii ) Tuition and related fees.
( iv ) Equipment, as defined in 2 CFR 200.33. Note to paragraph ( c
)(2)( iv
):
If the grantee has established a threshold for equipment that is lower than $5,000 for other purposes, it must use that threshold to exclude equipment under the modified total direct cost base for the purposes of this section.
( 3 ) The eight percent indirect cost reimbursement limit specified in paragraph (c)(1) of this section also applies to sub-awards that fund training, as determined by the Secretary under paragraph (b) of this section.
( 4 ) The eight percent limit does not apply to agencies of Indian tribal governments, local governments, and States as defined in 2 CFR 200.54, 200.200.64, and 200.90, respectively.
( 5 ) Indirect costs in excess of the eight percent limit may not be charged directly, used to satisfy matching or cost-sharing requirements, or charged to another Federal award.
( d ) A grantee using the training rate of eight percent is required to have documentation available for audit that shows that its negotiated indirect cost rate is at least eight percent.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
[59 FR 59582, Nov. 17, 1994, as amended at 72 FR 69147, Dec. 7, 2007; 79 FR 76092, Dec. 19, 2014]
### §3487. Refusal to pay as evidence of embezzlement

The refusal of any person, whether in or out of office, charged with the safe-keeping, transfer, or disbursement of the public money to pay any draft, order, or warrant, drawn upon him by the Government Accountability Office, for any public money in his hands belonging to the United States, no matter in what capacity the same may have been received, or may be held, or to transfer or disburse any such money, promptly, upon the legal requirement of any authorized officer, shall be deemed, upon the trial of any indictment against such person for embezzlement, prima facie evidence of such embezzlement.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 833; Pub. L. 108–271, §8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §180 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §94, 35 Stat. 1106; June 10, 1921, ch. 18, §304, 42 Stat. 24).

"General Accounting Office" was substituted for "proper accounting officer of the Treasury".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Pub. L. 108–271 substituted "Government Accountability Office" for "General Accounting Office".
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 10, 2021

NO. 03

- 21

- 00274

- CV

J. M. , Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFOR E JU STICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed b y th e tr i a l court on July 6, 2021

. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. Because

appellant is ind igen t and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean TDS

1 869 861 866 551

2 877 865 871 554

3 874 807 847 539

4 810 799 804 513

5 810 728 784 501

6 719 652 670 430

7 737 686 718 460

8 696 632 669 429

9 631 583 609 392

10 611 568 581 375

11 625 605 612 394

12 609 566 597 385

13 567 556 561 363

14 556 548 552 357

15 547 495 529 343

16 398 130 183 129

17 520 102 288 194

18 560 525 550 356

19 624 559 578 373

20 703 606 662 425

21 648 622 629 405

22 622 529 597 385

23 598 564 585 378

24 605 535 556 360

25 690 609 652 419

26 684 633 651 418

27 632 560 593 382

28 560 538 548 355

29 537 416 494 321

30 554 526 546 353

31 556 541 548 355

Total 18930

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Check 21 

Period: May 2022 Run Date: 11/22/2022
(No. 74-CC-531

#### Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 25, 1974.*

Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
§ 76.797 When is an SEA required to make adjustments to allocations under this subpart? ( a ) The SEA must make any necessary adjustments to allocations under a covered program on or before the date the SEA allocates funds to LEAs under the program for the succeeding academic year.
( b ) In allocating funds to a charter school LEA based on adjustments made in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, the SEA may use funds from the SEA's allocation under the applicable covered program for the academic year in which the charter school LEA opened or significantly expanded its enrollment, or from the SEA's allocation under the program for the succeeding academic year.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 8065a)
§ 656.30 What are allowable costs and limitations on allowable costs? ( a ) *Allowable costs.* Except as provided under paragraph (b) of this section, a grant awarded under this part may be used to pay all or part of the cost of establishing, strengthening, or operating a comprehensive or undergraduate Center including, but not limited to, the cost of— ( 1 ) Faculty and staff salaries and travel;
( 2 ) Library acquisitions;
( 3 ) Teaching and research materials;
( 4 ) Curriculum planning and development;
( 5 ) Bringing visiting scholars and faculty to the Center to teach, conduct research, or participate in conferences or workshops;
( 6 ) Training and improvement of staff;
( 7 ) Projects conducted in cooperation with other centers addressing themes of world, regional, cross-regional, international, or global importance; and
( 8 ) Summer institutes in the United States or abroad designed to provide language and area training in the Center's field or topic.
( b ) *Limitations on allowable costs.* The following are limitations on allowable costs: ( 1 ) Equipment costs exceeding 10 percent of the grant are not allowable.
( 2 ) Funds for undergraduate travel are allowable only in conjunction with a formal program of supervised study in the subject area on which the Center focuses.
( 3 ) Grant funds may not be used to supplant funds normally used by applicants for purposes of this part.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1122)
[61 FR 50193, Sept. 24, 1996, as amended at 64 FR 7739, Feb. 16, 1999]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 206

 212

 222

 224

 248

 274

 288

 270

 264

 258

 234

 234

 222

 211

 212

 212

 211

 209

 213

 206

 220

 218

 220

 211

 216

 201

 207

 212

 202

 196

 198

 162

 157

 158

 168

 169

 174

 173

 168

 170

 170

 170

 170

 173

 178

 184

 186

 184

 185

 176

 178

 182

 175

 173

 177

 178

 175

 180

 185

 177

 173

 177

 181

 182

 181

 189

 196

 212

 220

 198

 202

 192

 186

 189

 185

 184

 191

 193

 193

 190

 186

 186

 190

 186

 187

 187

 189

 187

 193

 194

 191

 187

 187

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 28, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 128

 128

 128

 133

 137

 147

 152

 138

 141

 135

 131

 133

 130

 130

 134

 135

 135

 133

 131

 131

 133

 131

 132

 132

 133

 132

 135

 136

 134

 132

 132

TOTAL 5,914

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20