alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements for the twelve months ended December 31, 1996 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          31,618
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                42,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    101,356
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          41,951
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            42,657
<LOANS>                                      1,234,318
<ALLOWANCE>                                     18,768
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,496,421
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,095,486
<SHORT-TERM>                                    99,055
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             16,756
<LONG-TERM>                                    146,466
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            88
<OTHER-SE>                                     138,570
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,496,421
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                114,799
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,873
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   796
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               125,468
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              52,077
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              63,785
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           61,683
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   10,794
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 281
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 47,253
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,484
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      21,484
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,704
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.37
<LOANS-NON>                                     15,380
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 6,913
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  9,504
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                16,234
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    9,961
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,701
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               18,768
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          3,238
        

</TABLE>
#### Marie Hill, Appellant, *v.*Guaranty Trust Company and Another, as Trustees, etc., Impleaded, Appellants. Alphonse J. Stephani and The Equitable Trust Company, as Committee, etc., Respondents.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 13th day of March, 1913, denying a motion for the appointment of a guardian ad litem for the defendant Stephani, and also from an order entered on the 7th day of April, 1913, denying a motion for a reargument.

Per Curiam:

As the incompetent is made a party defendant, and a judgment is asked binding him as distinct from his committee, it is necessary that he should appear by a guardian ad litem, as no appearance without a guardian ad litem would be effective. The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed, and the Equitable Trust Company, the committee of the personal estate of the incompetent, is appointed his guardian ad litem. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott and Dowling, JJ. Order reversed and the Equitable Trust Company appointed guardian ad litem of the incompetent. Order to be settled on notice.
---

CERTIFICATION OF 
  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Boschert, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial
  Officer of Balsam Ventures, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to
  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
        and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                             



| | By:    | /s/ John Boschert                                
| | ------ | -------------------------------------------------
| |        |                                                  
| | Name:  | John Boschert                                    
| |        |                                                  
| | Title: | Secretary, Treasurer and  Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                                                  
| | Date:  | August 18, 2004                                  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
  by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
  staff upon request.


This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which
  it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
  the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
  before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation
  language contained in such filing.

---
#### § 642.6 What definitions apply?

(a) *General definitions.* The following terms are defined in 2 CFR part 200, subpart A, or 34 CFR 77.1:

- Applicant
- Application
- Award
- Budget
- EDGAR
- Equipment
- Facilities
- Fiscal year
- Grant
- Grantee
- Nonprofit
- Private
- Project
- Project period
- Public
- Secretary
- State
- Supplies

(b) *Definitions that apply to this part.*

*Act* means the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended.

*Federal TRIO programs* means those programs authorized under section 402A of the Act: the Upward Bound, Talent Search, Student Support Services, Educational Opportunity Centers, and Ronald E. McNair Postbaccalaureate Achievement programs.

*Foster care youth* means youth who are in foster care or who are aging out of the foster care system.

*Homeless children and youth* means persons defined in section 725 of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11434a).

*Individual with a disability* means a person who has a disability, as that term is defined in section 12102 of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. 12101 *et seq.*).

*Institution of higher education* means an educational institution as defined in sections 101 and 102 of the Act.

*Leadership personnel* means project directors, coordinators, and other individuals involved with the supervision and direction of projects funded under the Federal TRIO programs.

*Veteran* means a person who—

(1) Served on active duty as a member of the Armed Forces of the United States for a period of more than 180 days and was discharged or released under conditions other than dishonorable;

(2) Served on active duty as a member of the Armed Forces of the United States and was discharged or released because of a service connected disability;

(3) Was a member of a reserve component of the Armed Forces of the United States and was called to active duty for a period of more than 30 days; or

(4) Was a member of a reserve component of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of a contingency operation (as that term is defined in section 101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code) on or after September 11, 2001.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1001 *et seq.,* 1070a-11, 1070(b), 1088, and 1141)

[47 FR 17788, Apr. 23, 1982, as amended at 54 FR 7737, Feb. 22, 1989; 57 FR 9005, Mar. 13, 1992; 58 FR 51519, Oct. 1, 1993; 75 FR 65771, Oct. 26, 2010; 79 FR 76102, Dec. 19, 2014]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-30171

Summary Calendar

TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

PATRICK PENDERGRAFT, ET AL.,

Defendants,

KOURTNEY MARTIN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(98-CV-545-E)

September 17, 1999

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kourtney Martin appeals the district court’s granting of

summary judgment to Travelers Property Casualty Corporation

(“Travelers”) and the district court’s denial of her motion for

reconsideration of the grant of summary judgment. Since her appeal

of the summary judgment order was not timely, this court lacks

jurisdiction to hear an appeal of the underlying judgment.

Furthermore, although this court has jurisdiction over her appeal

of the denial of the motion to reconsider, we find that the
district court did not abuse its discretion and, therefore, affirm.

In order for this court to have jurisdiction over the

appellant’s appeal, the appeal must be timely filed. See United

States v. Cooper, 135 F.3d 960, 961 (5th Cir. 1998). Since Ms.

Martin’s motion to reconsider was filed more than ten days after

the order granting summary judgment was entered, her Notice of

Appeal was not timely to stay the 30 day period for notice of

appeal of that order under Rule 4(a). See FED. R. APP. P.

4(a)(1)(A), 4(a)(4), and FED. R. CIV. P. 6(a). As a result, this

court has jurisdiction to review only the motion for

reconsideration. A post-judgment motion to reconsider is a Rule

60(b) motion if the motion is filed more than ten days after the

underlying judgment is entered. See Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat

Rentals, Inc., 784 F.2d 665, 667 (5th Cir. 1986). Ms. Martin’s

motion is, therefore, a Rule 60(b) motion, and the standard of

review is abuse of discretion. See Halicki v. Louisiana Casino

Cruises, Inc., 151 F.3d 465, 470 (5th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 119

S. Ct. 1143 (1999); Bohlin Co. v. Bunning Co., 6 F.3d 350, 353 (5th

Cir. 1993)(under the abuse of discretion standard, the court’s

decision need only be reasonable).

Having reviewed the record, this court finds that the

district court reasonably found that the policy exclusion applied

since: (1) assuming that the appellant is correct in arguing that

Louisiana law applies, the rental agreement was a valid contract

even though a minor was a party to the contract (see LA. CIV. CODE

ANN. art. 1919 (West 1999)), and (2) a jet ski is a “watercraft” as

that term is used in the insurance policy. Thus, the district
court did not abuse its discretion, and this court AFFIRMS.
### §1737. Manufacturer of sexually related mail matter

(a) Whoever shall print, reproduce, or manufacture any sexually related mail matter, intending or knowing that such matter will be deposited for mailing or delivery by mail in violation of section 3008 or 3010 of title 39, or in violation of any regulation of the Postal Service issued under such section, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both, for the first offense, and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both, for any second or subsequent offense.

(b) As used in this section, the term "sexually related mail matter" means any matter which is within the scope of section 3008(a) or 3010(d) of title 39.

(Added Pub. L. 91–375, §6(j)(37)(A), Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 781; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), (L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000" after "section, shall be" and for "fined not more than $10,000" after "offense, and shall be".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on first day of sixth month which begins after Aug. 12, 1970, see section 15(b) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of Title 39, Postal Service.
(No. 74-CC-45

#### Dean Business Equipment Company, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 20, 1973.*

Dean Business Equip. Co., Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1771

CHARLEATTA M. BLACK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at 

Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, District Judge. (3:20-cv-00177-GMG)

Submitted: September 22, 2022 Decided: September 26, 2022

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charleatta M. Black, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1771 Doc: 6 Filed: 09/26/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Charleatta M. Black seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her motion 

for appointment of counsel in her pending civil action. This court may exercise jurisdiction 

only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 

28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 

541, 545-46 (1949). The order Black seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an 

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack 

of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1771 Doc: 6 Filed: 09/26/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
### §11. Foreign government defined

The term "foreign government", as used in this title except in sections 112, 878, 970, 1116, and 1201, includes any government, faction, or body of insurgents within a country with which the United States is at peace, irrespective of recognition by the United States.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 686; Pub. L. 94–467, §11, Oct. 8, 1976, 90 Stat. 2001.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§98, 288, 349; section 235 of title 22 U.S.C., 1940 ed., Foreign Relations and Intercourse; section 41 of title 50, U.S.C., 1940 ed., War and National Defense (June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title VIII, §4, 40 Stat. 226).

The definition of "foreign government" contained in this section, with minor changes in phraseology, is from section 4 of title VIII of act June 15, 1917 (Ch. 30, 40 Stat. 217, 226), known as the Espionage Act of 1917. This definition was incorporated in sections 98, 288, and 349 of title 18 and in section 235 of title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse, and in section 41 of Title 50, War and National Defense, U.S.C., all in 1940 ed., since the definition was specifically enacted with reference to said sections and others not material here.

The remaining provisions of said sections 98 and 349 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., which were derived from sources other than said section 4 of title VIII of the act of June 15, 1917, are incorporated in sections 502 and 957 of this title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–467 inserted "except in sections 112, 878, 970, 1116, and 1201" after "title".
#### Samuel Starr, Appellant, v. Abraham M. Averett and William D. Snow, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
§ 668.53 Policies and procedures. ( a ) An institution must establish and use written policies and procedures for verifying an applicant's FAFSA information in accordance with the provisions of this subpart. These policies and procedures must include— ( 1 ) The time period within which an applicant must provide any documentation requested by the institution in accordance with § 668.57;
( 2 ) The consequences of an applicant's failure to provide the requested documentation within the specified time period;
( 3 ) The method by which the institution notifies an applicant of the results of its verification if, as a result of verification, the applicant's EFC changes and results in a change in the amount of the applicant's assistance under the title IV, HEA programs;
( 4 ) The procedures the institution will follow itself or the procedures the institution will require an applicant to follow to correct FAFSA information determined to be in error; and
( 5 ) The procedures for making referrals under § 668.16(g).
( b ) An institution's procedures must provide that it will furnish, in a timely manner, to each applicant whose FAFSA information is selected for verification a clear explanation of— ( 1 ) The documentation needed to satisfy the verification requirements; and
( 2 ) The applicant's responsibilities with respect to the verification of FAFSA information, including the deadlines for completing any actions required under this subpart and the consequences of failing to complete any required action.
( c ) An institution's procedures must provide that an applicant whose FAFSA information is selected for verification is required to complete verification before the institution exercises any authority under section 479A(a) of the HEA to make changes to the applicant's cost of attendance or to the values of the data items required to calculate the EFC.
Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1845-0041) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1094)
### Part II—United States International Trade Commission
| JLS | **J L Stephan Co PCCertified Public Accountants**
Jerry L. Stephan, CPA    John P. Morse, CPA 
Marty Szasz, CPA    David Skibowski, Jr., CPA
 

Exhibit 23.1

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT**

 

                 We consentto the incorporation by reference in this Annual Statement of The TrackerCorporation of America on Form 10-KSB of our report dated August 8, 2003 for theYear Ended March 31, 2003.

 

***/s/ J.L. Stephan Co., P.C.***

J.L. Stephan Co., P.C.

Traverse City, Michigan

October 13, 2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**862 East Eighth Street *Traverse City, MI  49686(231) 941-7600     *     E-mail jstephan@jlspc.com    *     Primary Fax (231) 941-1996     *    Alternate Fax (231) 929-3350**

  |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 270

 248

 238

 236

 233

 244

 218

 209

 205

 200

 198

 200

 194

 186

 189

 182

 178

 178

 174

 182

 184

 187

 189

 186

 188

 194

 193

 202

 209

 208

 206

 200

 196

 195

 202

 201

 192

 184

 184

 182

 177

 179

 168

 175

 164

 158

 152

 149

 151

 155

 156

 156

 154

 150

 155

 154

 163

 159

 158

 154

 242

 224

 217

 216

 218

 221

 209

 199

 196

 191

 189

 193

 184

 181

 180

 174

 164

 164

 165

 169

 171

 172

 172

 168

 173

 178

 172

 185

 187

 183

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:May 25, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 166

 154

 150

 149

 151

 153

 145

 139

 137

 134

 133

 135

 130

 128

 127

 124

 117

 117

 118

 120

 122

 122

 122

 120

 123

 126

 122

 130

 132

 129

TOTAL 5,657

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
(No. 74-CC-552

#### Larson and Mc Ginnis, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Corrections, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 11, 1974.*

Larson and Mc Ginnis, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
§ 690.82 Maintenance and retention of records. ( a ) An institution shall follow the record retention and examination provisions in this part and in 34 CFR 668.24.
( b ) For any disputed expenditures in any award year for which the institution cannot provide records, the Secretary determines the final authorized level of expenditures.
[61 FR 60494, Nov. 27, 1996, as amended at 86 FR 59626, Oct. 28, 2021]