alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Before the 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 55059 / January 8, 2007 

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-11814 

In the Matter of 

COLUMBIA 

MANAGEMENT ADVISORS, 

INC. and COLUMBIA 

FUNDS DISTRIBUTOR, 

INC., 

Respondents. 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

ENTER AN ORDER APPROVING 

OR DISAPPROVING DISTRIBUTION PLAN 

 

I. 

 

On July 19, 2006, pursuant to Rule 1103 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s 

Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans (“Fair Fund Rule”), 17 C.F.R. § 201.1103, the 

Commission published a Notice of Proposed Plan and Opportunity for Comment (“Notice”) for 

the distribution of monies placed into a Fair Fund in the above-captioned matter. The Notice 

invited public comment on the proposed distribution plan through August 18, 2006. 
On September 20, 2006, pursuant to Fair Fund Rule 1104, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1104, the 

Commission extended, for good cause shown, the time for entering an Order approving or 

disapproving the proposed distribution plan through December 16, 2006.1

The Commission believes that because of the complexity of the comments received, 

additional evaluation, review and analysis of the proposed distribution plan are required, and 

therefore good cause has been shown to extend the time period provided in Rule 1104 for entry 

of an order approving or disapproving the plan by an additional sixty days, to February 14, 2007. 

II. 

 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 

 

 Pursuant to Rule 1104 of the Rule on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 

201.1104, for good cause shown, the time for entering an Order approving or disapproving the 

proposed distribution plan is extended through February 14, 2007. 

 By the Commission. 

 Nancy M. Morris 

 Secretary 

 1 Rule 1104 of the Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1104, 

provides: 

At any time after 30 days following publication of notice of a proposed plan of disgorgement or of 

a proposed Fair Fund plan, the Commission shall, by order, approve, approve with modifications, 

or disapprove the proposed plan. In the discretion of the Commission, a proposed plan that is 

substantially modified prior to adoption may be republished for an additional comment period 

pursuant to 17 CFR 201.1103. The order approving or disapproving the plan should be entered 

within 30 days after the end of the final period allowed for comments on the proposed plan unless 

the Commission or the hearing officer, by written order, allows a longer period for good cause 

shown. 

Thirty days from the end of the final period for comments on the proposed distribution plan lapsed on September 17, 

2006. Because of the complexity of the comments received, further evaluation, review and analysis was required, 

and good cause was shown to extend the thirty day time period provided in Rule 1104 for entry of an order 

approving or disapproving the plan by ninety days, to December 16, 2006. 

2
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 23

                   Consent of Independent Public Accountants

To the Board of Directors of Household Finance Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation of our report dated August 27, 2002, included
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Household Finance Corporation as of
December 31, 2001 and 2000 and for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2001, into the Company's previously filed Registration
Statements No. 333-47945, No. 333-59453, No. 333-82119, No. 333-45740, No.
333-56152, No. 333-73746, No. 333-75328, No. 333-85886, No. 333-33240, No.
333-82119 and No. 333-61964 on Form S-3.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
August 27, 2002
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 555

 527

 509

 551

 449

 529

 492

 506

 497

 471

 461

 430

 473

 348

 349

 433

 389

 383

 408

 404

 400

 392

 374

 374

 395

 500

 521

 515

 525

 509

 543

 312

 386

 361

 374

 335

 296

 367

 268

 296

 347

 336

 329

 330

 266

 277

 274

 316

 319

 336

 333

 344

 347

 340

 339

 346

 371

 412

 399

 396

 402

 402

 467

 473

 443

 468

 403

 417

 404

 367

 372

 413

 404

 383

 394

 312

 319

 375

 364

 351

 386

 378

 373

 366

 354

 353

 367

 422

 471

 451

 468

 474

 483

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 7, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 305

 308

 290

 305

 265

 274

 266

 243

 246

 271

 266

 253

 259

 209

 213

 248

 241

 233

 255

 250

 247

 242

 235

 234

 243

 277

 307

 295

 305

 309

 314

TOTAL 12,475

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           9,016
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,678
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     25,438
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,132
<PP&E>                                           1,335
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,020
<BONDS>                                         12,650
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,786
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,467
<SALES>                                          2,868
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,383
<CGS>                                           23,252
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   684
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,447
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,037
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,410
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,410
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.30
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         685,044
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,377,581
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,027,825
<INVENTORY>                                 15,606,752
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            42,866,717
<PP&E>                                      57,201,245
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,449,525
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             115,927,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,004,235
<BONDS>                                     84,671,045
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,764,594
<COMMON>                                     4,691,080
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,887,059)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               115,927,210
<SALES>                                    178,704,656
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           186,496,021
<CGS>                                      124,906,198
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              172,146,874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,550,616
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               235,437
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,194,496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,963,227)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   303,969
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,007,166
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                601,200
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,665,996)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 685.411 Transfer to the Secretary of the borrower's right of recovery against third parties. ( a ) Upon the granting of any discharge under this subpart, the borrower is deemed to have assigned to, and relinquished in favor of, the Secretary any right to a loan refund (up to the amount discharged) that the borrower may have by contract or applicable law with respect to the loan or the contract for educational services for which the loan was received, against the school, its principals, its affiliates, and their successors, its sureties, and any private fund.
( b ) The provisions of this section apply notwithstanding any provision of State law that would otherwise restrict transfer of those rights by the borrower, limit or prevent a transferee from exercising those rights, or establish procedures or a scheme of distribution that would prejudice the Secretary's ability to recover on those rights.
( c ) Nothing in this section limits or forecloses the borrower's right to pursue legal and equitable relief against a party described in this section for recovery of any portion of a claim exceeding that assigned to the Secretary or any other claims arising from matters unrelated to the claim on which the loan is discharged.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Excelsior Venture Partners III, LLC (the Company), does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended April 30, 2005 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                          |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: June 14, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Douglas A. Lindgren 
|                    |  |  |  | Name:                    |  | Douglas A. Lindgren    
|                    |  |  |  | Title:                   |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                    |  | 
|Date: June 14, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Robert F. Aufenanger
|                    |  |  |  | Name:                    |  | Robert F. Aufenanger   
|                    |  |  |  | Title:                   |  | Treasurer              



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 300.192 Notice of intent to implement a by-pass. ( a ) Before taking any final action to implement a by-pass, the Secretary provides the SEA and, as appropriate, LEA or other public agency with written notice.
( b ) In the written notice, the Secretary— ( 1 ) States the reasons for the proposed by-pass in sufficient detail to allow the SEA and, as appropriate, LEA or other public agency to respond; and
( 2 ) Advises the SEA and, as appropriate, LEA or other public agency that it has a specific period of time (at least 45 days) from receipt of the written notice to submit written objections to the proposed by-pass and that it may request in writing the opportunity for a hearing to show cause why a by-pass should not be implemented.
( c ) The Secretary sends the notice to the SEA and, as appropriate, LEA or other public agency by certified mail with return receipt requested.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(f)(3)(A))
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned officer of Moldflow Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies
that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 25, 2004 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit
(the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange
Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A)
shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or
otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

Date: November 3, 2004

                                         /s/ SUZANNE E. MACCORMACK
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Name:    Suzanne E. MacCormack
                                         Title:   Executive Vice President of
                                                  Finance and Administration and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
No. 12,343.

#### Stewart *v.*The People.

Decided December 2, 1929.

Rehearing denied December 23, 1929.

Mr. F. D. Taggart, for plaintiff in error.

*457Mr. Robert E. Winbourn, Attorney General, Mr. E. J. Plunkett, Assistant, for the people.

*In Department.*

Mr. Justice Butler

delivered the opinion of the court.

Allen G. Stewart was convicted of an attempt to obtain money from an insurance company by means of the confidence game.

1. The court denied Stewart’s application for a bill of particulars. Such denial is said to be reversible error. It is within the sound discretion of the trial court to grant or deny such applications, and there is nothing in the record to indicate that the court’s discretion in this case was abused.

2. No evidence was introduced on behalf of Stewart. It is claimed that the evidence fails to prove the charge contained in the information, that at most it tended to prove an attempt to obtain money from the company by false pretense, and our attention is called to decisions to the effect that to constitute the offense charged here the attempt must have been made to obtain the money by some false or bogus means, token, symbol or device as distinguished from mere words, however false and fraudulent.

The undisputed evidence — Stewart introduced no evidence — is to the following effect: Stewart obtained a policy from the company insuring him against loss by theft of his automobile and its accessories. He thereafter filed with the company a written and signed statement that two spare wheels, tires and tubes belonging to the automobile had been stolen, and sought to collect the amount of the loss. He also reported the loss at police headquarters. Acting on information communicated by a stranger, two police officers went to Stewart’s residence. Stewart was engaged in packing his personal belongings, preparing, his counsel says, to make a trip' with his auto*458mobile to Seattle, "Washington. The officers searched the premises. In the chicken coop they found one of the wheels and one of the tires. The other wheel they found in the bottom of a barrel covered with gunnysacks and a tarpaulin. When asked why he hid the wheels, Stewart made an explanation that was ridiculous on its face.

This evidence justified Stewart’s conviction of an attempt to obtain money from the insurance company by means of the confidence game. *Powers v. People,*53 Colo. 43, 123 Pac. 642; *West v.*People, 60 Colo. 488, 156 Pac. 137; *Roll v. People,*78 Colo. 589, 243 Pac. 641.

The judgment is affirmed.

Me. Chief Justice Whitfoed, Me. Justice Moose and Me. Justice Bueke concur.
!"#$ 

%&'()!*


+,)$ "!"-! 

	










 
!"
"
#


!$%

 &'
(*
 
 





++	


,


!
 



&'
(*




-#


"#	


++
&'-#(*	


,
 








./




01





2!"







!

3



4 
&56*

 /



# 

7 
&8-
9:;::<*


=

+
&8-
9>6?@A*

-#

+
,
0#	


A@6>
B
+
$$#
	
$A6@

!#	
8
A;AA?

2&:6>*
;C:D<<66

$





B
#

&8-
9@C5?;*

1
+B
00
0
+
B
	


E

2,
1$

@@AD
B




$"	
8
A;:6;

2&:6>*
:5@D5666

$




#


#=&8-
9
;C>;>*

$#
+"

!



?5;
F
 
-	
$@

,2
,	
8

A;56@

2&C>6*

>>AD??65

$




Case 17-03023-KLP Doc 47 Filed 06/23/17 Entered 06/23/17 10:14:38 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 4
01



,
  &C*
 
 
 

 !!$

 $!
 56D
 


2	






G
2
,
$




$


#



H

 




-
=$2! 
F$"



!=H


.
	
	H

	 	 	
	



 	 	











 	 	











 	 	

-E

-
#	
I

-
J
-	


?C6:
B!
$	
!
0

-
	

 

A6:@>

&;6@*
C>?D;:6C

&?6;*
>:;D<C<<
0
4


#K
#!#


	
	
	



	 	 				







 	 	











 	 	


B
#
	
I

+
,
!

B
#
	


@@AD
B




$"	
8
A;:6;


	
	



	 	 	 !			









 	 	











 	 	


=

+	
I

# 

7 	
I

-#

+
,
0#	



-4
@@C::

!#	
8
A;A;6


	
	



	 	 	"

	

!	
 
 	 	











 	 	

#

#=	
I

$#
+"

!


?5;
F
 
-	
$@D

,2
,	
8
A;56@


	
	



	 	 		#	 !														 	 

+
$


7
$!=	
I

L1
"

	
++

>@@


0
=
	
$C66

!#	
8
A;A@<


 	 
 	  	 
 	 $	

 %	

Jun 23 2017 /s/ Keith L. Phillips

Jun 23 2017

Case 17-03023-KLP Doc 47 Filed 06/23/17 Entered 06/23/17 10:14:38 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 4


/"-- %*



$$


+!

$<6AAD@&*	

 
! 


""







 


$2


!
 
2


	 	 	 	 
=

+





 	 	











 	 	


=

+	
I

$



Case 17-03023-KLP Doc 47 Filed 06/23/17 Entered 06/23/17 10:14:38 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 4


	
	




++

!%
-E

-
#	
I

-
#J

$
	


?C6:
B!
$	
!
0

-
	

 

A6:@>



!%

=

+	
I

-#

+
,
0#	



-4
@@C::

!#	
8
A;A;6D@C::

-#


"#	
++

!%
+
$


7
$!=	
I

L1
"

	
++

>@@


0
=
	
$C66

!#	
8
A;A@<

Case 17-03023-KLP Doc 47 Filed 06/23/17 Entered 06/23/17 10:14:38 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 4
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5036 

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from taking any 

action to implement, enforce, or otherwise give effect to the final rule, 

entitled ‘‘Protecting Statutory Conscience Rights in Health Care; Delegations of Authority’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 12, 2019 

Mr. PAPPAS (for himself, Ms. LEE of California, Mrs. HAYES, Ms. NORTON, 

Mr. CASTEN of Illinois, Mr. NADLER, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Ms. 

MOORE, Mr. RUSH, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. DOGGETT, Mr. 

CISNEROS, Mr. WELCH, Ms. TLAIB, Ms. SHALALA, Ms. BLUNT ROCHESTER, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Ms. ESCOBAR, Mr. COHEN, Ms. SPEIER, Ms. 

PRESSLEY, Ms. JUDY CHU of California, Mr. POCAN, Ms. HAALAND, Mr. 

SMITH of Washington, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. BLUMENAUER, 

Mr. KHANNA, Ms. DEGETTE, Mr. RYAN, Ms. MENG, Ms. SA ́NCHEZ, Ms. 

DELBENE, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. HASTINGS, 

Mrs. LEE of Nevada, Mrs. FLETCHER, Mr. MICHAEL F. DOYLE of Pennsylvania, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. ENGEL, 

Mr. SOTO, Ms. BONAMICI, Mr. TRONE, Mr. SIRES, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, 

Mr. GOMEZ, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mr. COOPER, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. 

FOSTER, Ms. SCHRIER, Ms. MUCARSEL-POWELL, Ms. FRANKEL, Mr. 

DESAULNIER, Mrs. LAWRENCE, Miss RICE of New York, Mr. GARCI ́A of 

Illinois, Mr. SHERMAN, Ms. BASS, Mr. PAYNE, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. 

TAKANO, Ms. KUSTER of New Hampshire, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. MOULTON, 

Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY

of New York, Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania, Mr. LARSEN of 

Washington, Mrs. DEMINGS, Ms. SHERRILL, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, 

Ms. JAYAPAL, Ms. BROWNLEY of California, Mrs. LOWEY, Ms. WEXTON, 

Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. LOEBSACK, Mr. KEATING, Ms. PLASKETT, Mr. 

CICILLINE, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, Mr. GALLEGO, Mr. 

HIGGINS of New York, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. LEVIN of Michigan, Mr. 

RASKIN, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. CRIST, Mr. 

MCNERNEY, Mrs. TRAHAN, and Mr. KILDEE) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5036 IH

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

from taking any action to implement, enforce, or otherwise give effect to the final rule, entitled ‘‘Protecting 

Statutory Conscience Rights in Health Care; Delegations 

of Authority’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Put Patients First 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING IMPLEMENTATION OF FINAL RULE. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec8 retary of Health and Human Services may not take any 

9 action to implement, enforce, or otherwise give effect to 

10 the final rule, entitled ‘‘Protecting Statutory Conscience 

11 Rights in Health Care; Delegations of Authority’’ (84 Fed. 

12 Reg. 23170–23272, May 21, 2019). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 566

 565

 579

 596

 596

 609

 593

 558

 549

 533

 512

 582

 591

 490

 435

 478

 483

 506

 485

 573

 560

 575

 536

 500

 484

 531

 506

 485

 526

 386

 521

 545

 502

 556

 552

 574

 542

 498

 488

 483

 467

 469

 426

 398

 399

 412

 451

 434

 426

 497

 489

 482

 427

 388

 404

 415

 406

 397

 346

 323

 548

 554

 550

 574

 581

 591

 565

 529

 516

 511

 494

 519

 493

 434

 419

 440

 472

 471

 455

 543

 527

 512

 479

 430

 440

 462

 453

 442

 430

 348

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 25, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 355

 358

 356

 371

 375

 381

 365

 343

 335

 332

 321

 337

 321

 284

 275

 288

 308

 307

 297

 352

 342

 332

 312

 282

 288

 302

 296

 289

 282

 231

TOTAL 14,782

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21