alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Beacon Power Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JamesM. Spiezio, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ James M. Spiezio    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| James M. Spiezio        |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

October  31, 2006

----
§ 300.223 Joint establishment of eligibility. ( a ) *General.* An SEA may require an LEA to establish its eligibility jointly with another LEA if the SEA determines that the LEA will be ineligible under this subpart because the agency will not be able to establish and maintain programs of sufficient size and scope to effectively meet the needs of children with disabilities.
( b ) *Charter school exception.* An SEA may not require a charter school that is an LEA to jointly establish its eligibility under paragraph (a) of this section unless the charter school is explicitly permitted to do so under the State's charter school statute.
( c ) *Amount of payments.* If an SEA requires the joint establishment of eligibility under paragraph (a) of this section, the total amount of funds made available to the affected LEAs must be equal to the sum of the payments that each LEA would have received under § 300.705 if the agencies were eligible for those payments.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1413(e)(1) and (2))
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Santo Romano and Giuseppe Esposito, Appellants.

Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Kings county affirmed. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
§ 222.33 When must an applicant make its first or only membership count? ( a ) ( 1 ) An applicant must select a day in the current school year as the survey date for making the first membership count, which must be no earlier than the fourth day of the regular school year and before January 31.
( 2 ) The applicant must use the same survey date for all schools in the LEA.
( b ) As of the survey date, the applicant must— ( 1 ) Count the membership of its federally connected children; and
( 2 ) Count the total membership of its children—both federally connected and non-federally connected.
( c ) The data on the application resulting from the count in paragraph (b) of this section must be accurate and verifiable by the application deadline.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1810-0036) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7703, 7705)
[60 FR 50778, Sept. 29, 1995, as amended at 80 FR 33163, June 11, 2015; 81 FR 64741, Sept. 20, 2016]
§ 75.226 What procedures does the Secretary use if the Secretary decides to give special consideration to applications supported by strong, moderate, or promising evidence? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70327 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) As used in this section, “strong evidence” is defined in 34 CFR 77.1(c).
( b ) As used in this section, “moderate evidence” is defined in 34 CFR 77.1(c).
( c ) As used in this section, “promising evidence” is defined in 34 CFR 77.1(c).
( d ) If the Secretary determines that special consideration of applications supported by strong, moderate, or promising evidence is appropriate, the Secretary may establish a separate competition under the procedures in 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3), or provide competitive preference under the procedures in 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2), for applications supported by— ( 1 ) Evidence that meets the conditions in the definition of “strong evidence”;
( 2 ) Evidence that meets the conditions in the definition of “moderate evidence”; or
( 3 ) Evidence that meets the conditions in the definition of “promising evidence.”
[82 FR 35449, July 31, 2017]
### §3334. General provisions

The provisions of chapter 215, title 18, United States Code, and the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure applicable to regular grand juries shall apply to special grand juries to the extent not inconsistent with sections 3331, 3332, or 3333 of this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 91–452, title I, §101(a), Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 926.)
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17D0101. RICKY EDWARDS v. THE STATE.

On September 22, 2016, RickyEdwardsfiled this application for discretionary

review, seeking to appeal the trial court’s order denying his “Motion to Withdraw

Alford Plea.” The denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea may be appealed

directly. See Smith v. State, 283 Ga. 376, 376 (659 SE2d 380) (2008). Ordinarily,

if a party applies for discretionary review of a directly appealable order, we grant the

application under OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). To fall within this general rule, however, the

application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order to be appealed. See

OCGA § 5-6-35 (d) & (j); Hill v. State, 204 Ga. App. 582 (420 SE2d 393) (1992).

Although Edwards included a copy of the trial court’s order with his

application, it was not a stamped “filed” copy as required by Court of Appeals Rule

31 (e). Without the stamped “filed” copy of the order, this Court cannot ascertain if

the application was filed within 30 days, which is a jurisdictional requirement. See

OCGA § 5-6-35 (d); Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989).

Consequently, on September 28, 2016, this Court ordered Edwardsto supplement his

application within ten days with a stamped “filed” copy of the order to be appealed.

This Court provided that failure to comply with this directive would result in

dismissal of the application. Edwards has not submitted a stamped “filed” copy of

October 18, 2016
the order, and more than ten days have passed since the September 28, 2016 order. 

Accordingly, Edwards’s application for discretionary appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

2

10/18/2016
§ 648.62 How can the institutional payment be used? ( a ) The institutional payment must be first applied against a fellow's tuition and fees.
( b ) After payment of a fellow's tuition and fees, the institutional payment may be applied against educational expenses of the fellow that are not covered by tuition and fees and are related to the academic program in which the fellow is enrolled. These expenses include the following: ( 1 ) Costs for rental or purchase of any books, materials, or supplies required of students in the same course of study.
( 2 ) Costs of computer hardware, project specific software, and other equipment prorated by the length of the student's fellowship over the reasonable life of the equipment.
( 3 ) Membership fees of professional associations.
( 4 ) Travel and per diem to professional association meetings and registration fees.
( 5 ) International travel, per diem, and registration fees to participate in educational activities.
( 6 ) Expenses incurred in research.
( 7 ) Costs of reproducing and binding of educational products.
( c ) The institutional payment must supplement and, to the extent practical, increase the funds that would otherwise be made available for the purpose of the program and, in no case, to supplant institutional funds currently available for fellowships.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1135b, 1135d)
§ 607.3 What is an enrollment of needy students? ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, for the purpose of § 607.2(a)(1), an applicant institution has an enrollment of needy students if in the base year— ( 1 ) At least 50 percent of its degree students received student financial assistance under one or more of the following programs: Pell Grant, Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant, College Work-Study, and Perkins Loan; or
( 2 ) The percentage of its undergraduate degree students who were enrolled on at least a half-time basis and received Pell Grants exceeded the median percentage of undergraduate degree students who were enrolled on at least a half-time basis and received Pell Grants at comparable institutions that offer similar instruction.
( b ) The Secretary may waive the requirement contained in paragraph (a) of this section if the institution demonstrates that— ( 1 ) The State provides more than 30 percent of the institution's budget and the institution charges not more than $99.00 for tuition and fees for an academic year;
( 2 ) At least 30 percent of the students served by the institution in the base year were students from low-income families;
( 3 ) The institution substantially increases the higher education opportunities for low-income students who are also educationally disadvantaged, underrepresented in postsecondary education, or minority students;
( 4 ) The institution substantially increases the higher education opportunities for individuals who reside in an area that is not included in a “metropolitan statistical area” as defined by the Office of Management and Budget and who are unserved by other postsecondary institutions;
( 5 ) The institution is located on or within 50 miles of an Indian reservation, or a substantial population of Indians and the institution will, if granted the waiver, substantially increase higher education opportunities for American Indians;
( 6 ) It is a tribal college or university; or
( 7 ) The institution will, if granted the waiver, substantially increase the higher education opportunities for Black Americans, Hispanic Americans, Native Americans, Asian Americans or Pacific Islanders, including Native Hawaiians.
( c ) For the purpose of paragraph (b) of this section, the Secretary considers “low-income” to be an amount which does not exceed 150 percent of the amount equal to the poverty level as established by the United States Bureau of the Census.
( d ) Each year, the Secretary notifies prospective applicants through a notice in the Federal Register of the low-income figures.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1058 and 1067)
[52 FR 30529, Aug. 14, 1987, as amended at 60 FR 15447, Mar. 23, 1995; 64 FR 70153, Dec. 15, 1999]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 922

 951

 944

 930

 908

 957

 897

 863

 875

 887

 888

 884

 905

 922

 918

 912

 895

 927

 917

 933

 877

 806

 830

 904

 870

 943

 1,071

 971

 945

 979

 960

 637

 648

 651

 656

 651

 684

 676

 650

 635

 637

 639

 648

 653

 659

 664

 661

 668

 683

 670

 675

 668

 677

 690

 688

 679

 690

 687

 676

 679

 680

 664

 753

 795

 789

 779

 752

 821

 790

 772

 776

 771

 769

 769

 768

 772

 769

 767

 761

 774

 754

 779

 743

 722

 744

 753

 751

 792

 813

 773

 775

 791

 748

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:February 2, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 481

 507

 504

 497

 481

 523

 504

 493

 496

 492

 491

 491

 491

 493

 491

 490

 486

 494

 482

 497

 475

 462

 476

 481

 480

 505

 518

 494

 495

 505

 478

TOTAL 23,885

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW data

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total Daily Total

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS In Acre Feet

Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval 

Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3,274 4,105 7,379 6,494 8,143 14,637 0.0 0.0

2-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,218 4,105 6,323 4,399 8,143 12,542 0.0 0.0

3-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1,958 4,095 6,052 3,883 8,122 12,005 0.0 0.0

4-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,286 4,071 6,357 4,535 8,074 12,609 0.0 0.0

5-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,065 4,090 6,155 4,095 8,113 12,208 0.0 0.0

6-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,458 3,556 6,014 4,875 7,054 11,929 0.0 0.0

7-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2,594 4,195 6,790 5,146 8,321 13,467 0.0 0.0

8-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,915 4,234 6,150 3,799 8,399 12,198 0.0 0.0

9-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,927 4,223 6,151 3,823 8,377 12,200 0.0 0.0

10-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,934 4,191 6,125 3,837 8,312 12,149 0.0 0.0

11-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,929 4,208 6,137 3,826 8,346 12,172 0.0 0.0

12-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,950 4,194 6,144 3,868 8,319 12,187 0.0 0.0

13-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,942 4,205 6,147 3,851 8,341 12,192 0.0 0.0

14-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,946 4,266 6,212 3,859 8,462 12,321 0.0 0.0

15-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,945 4,264 6,209 3,858 8,457 12,315 0.0 0.0

16-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,282 4,205 6,488 4,527 8,341 12,868 0.0 0.0

17-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,922 4,110 6,033 3,813 8,153 11,966 0.0 0.0

18-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,932 4,133 6,065 3,832 8,197 12,029 0.0 0.0

19-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,618 4,185 6,803 5,193 8,300 13,493 0.0 0.0

20-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,287 4,183 6,469 4,536 8,296 12,832 0.0 0.0

21-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,939 4,221 6,160 3,846 8,373 12,219 0.0 0.0

22-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,621 4,206 6,827 5,198 8,343 13,541 0.0 0.0

23-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,933 4,222 6,155 3,834 8,374 12,208 0.0 0.0

24-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,676 4,201 5,877 3,325 8,332 11,657 0.0 0.0

25-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,626 4,203 6,829 5,209 8,337 13,546 0.0 0.0

26-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,281 4,197 6,478 4,525 8,324 12,849 0.0 0.0

27-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,933 4,193 6,127 3,835 8,317 12,152 0.0 0.0

28-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,921 4,182 6,103 3,811 8,295 12,106 0.0 0.0

29-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 1,941 4,197 6,138 3,850 8,324 12,174 0.0 0.0

30-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,555 4,262 6,817 5,067 8,454 13,521 0.0 0.0

31-Jan-20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,783 4,271 6,053 3,536 8,471 12,007 0.0 0.0

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 0 4 4 XXXX 0 0 66,592 129,173 195,765 132,085 256,214 388,299 XXXX XXXX

Official data is posted on CDFW's webpage.

Banks Tracy Combined Banks SWP CVP

CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT, SPLITTAIL and LONGFIN REPORT

JANUARY 2020

DATE

Delta Smelt Daily 

Density

Tracy Combined
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7790

JAMES THOMAS WILLIAMS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-121) Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 25, 1999 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Thomas Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: James Thomas Williams appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). On appeal, Williams has failed to challengethe district court’s finding that three of his claims were procedurally barred and that the fourth claim was not exhausted. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 10,768 4,067 7,327

2 9,228 3,279 5,932

3 8,450 2,791 5,562

4 7,872 2,625 5,122

5 8,970 2,501 5,145

6 10,291 2,110 6,004

7 10,275 2,397 6,245

8 10,392 3,175 6,241

9 10,565 3,330 6,156

10 10,647 3,358 6,273

11 11,945 3,934 7,113

12 12,708 4,238 7,890

13 12,826 4,131 7,747

14 12,154 3,649 6,932

15 0 0 0

16 0 0 0

17 0 0 0

18 0 0 0

19 0 0 0

20 0 0 0

21 0 0 0

22 0 0 0

23 0 0 0

24 0 0 0

25 0 0 0

26 0 0 0

27 0 0 0

28 0 0 0

29 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

31 0 0 0

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Collinsville Bottom On The Sacramento 

River 

Period: December 2023 Run Date: 1/16/2024
§ 33.16 Disqualification of reviewing official or ALJ. ( a ) A reviewing official or ALJ in a particular case may disqualify himself or herself at any time.
( b ) A party may file with the ALJ a motion for disqualification of a reviewing official or an ALJ. That motion must be accompanied by an affidavit alleging personal bias or other reason for disqualification.
( c ) The motion and affidavit must be filed promptly upon the party's discovery of reasons requiring disqualification, or the objections are deemed waived.
( d ) The affidavit must state specific facts that support the party's belief that personal bias or other reason for disqualification exists and the time and circumstances of the party's discovery of those facts. It must be accompanied by a certificate of the representative of record that it is made in good faith.
( e ) Upon the filing of the motion and affidavit, the ALJ shall not proceed further in the case until he or she resolves the matter of disqualification in accordance with paragraph (f) of this section.
( f ) ( 1 ) If the ALJ determines that a reviewing official is disqualified, the ALJ shall dismiss the complaint without prejudice.
( 2 ) If the ALJ disqualifies himself or herself, the case must be reassigned promptly to another ALJ.
( 3 ) If the ALJ denies a motion to disqualify, the Department head may determine the matter only as part of his or her review of the initial decision upon appeal, if any.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3803(g)(2)(G))
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 63 (Friday, April 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 18156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7790]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-421-811]


Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From the Netherlands: Extension 
of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

DATES: Effective Date: April 1, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dena Crossland, Brian Davis, or 
Angelica Mendoza, Office 7, AD/CVD Operations, Import Administration, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: 
(202) 482-3362, (202) 482-7924, or (202) 482-3019, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On August 31, 2010, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published in the Federal Register a notice of initiation of the 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on purified 
carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) from the Netherlands. See Initiation of 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Deferral 
of Initiation of Administrative Review, 75 FR 53274 (August 31, 2010). 
This review covers the period July 1, 2009, through June 30, 2010. The 
preliminary results for this administrative review are currently 
scheduled for April 2, 2011.

Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results

    Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act), requires the Department to complete the preliminary results of an 
administrative review within 245 days after the last day of the 
anniversary month of an order for which a review is requested. However, 
if it is not practicable to complete the review within this time 
period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to extend 
the 245 day time period for the preliminary results up to 365 days.
    The Department has determined it is not practicable to complete 
this review within the statutory time limit because we require 
additional time to collect and analyze additional information regarding 
Akzo Nobel Functional Chemicals B.V.'s calculation of certain expenses, 
needed for our preliminary results. Accordingly, the Department is 
extending the time limit for completion of the preliminary results of 
this administrative review until no later than June 16, 2011, which is 
320 days from the last day of the anniversary month of this order. We 
intend to issue the final results in this review no later than 120 days 
after publication of the preliminary results.
    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i) of the Act.

    Dated: March 25, 2011.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011-7790 Filed 3-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
### §3508. Custody and return of foreign witnesses

(a) When the testimony of a person who is serving a sentence, is in pretrial detention, or is otherwise being held in custody, in a foreign country, is needed in a State or Federal criminal proceeding, the Attorney General shall, when he deems it appropriate in the exercise of his discretion, have the authority to request the temporary transfer of that person to the United States for the purposes of giving such testimony, to transport such person to the United States in custody, to maintain the custody of such person while he is in the United States, and to return such person to the foreign country.

(b) Where the transfer to the United States of a person in custody for the purposes of giving testimony is provided for by treaty or convention, by this section, or both, that person shall be returned to the foreign country from which he is transferred. In no event shall the return of such person require any request for extradition or extradition proceedings, or proceedings under the immigration laws.

(c) Where there is a treaty or convention between the United States and the foreign country in which the witness is being held in custody which provides for the transfer, custody and return of such witnesses, the terms and conditions of that treaty shall apply. Where there is no such treaty or convention, the Attorney General may exercise the authority described in paragraph (a) if both the foreign country and the witness give their consent.

(Added Pub. L. 100–690, title VI, §6484(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4384.)