alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 644.30 What are allowable costs? The cost principles that apply to the Educational Opportunity Centers program are in 2 CFR part 200, subpart E. Allowable costs include the following if they are reasonably related to the objectives of the project: ( a ) Transportation, meals, and, with specific prior approval of the Secretary, lodging for participants and project staff for— ( 1 ) Visits to postsecondary educational institutions;
( 2 ) Participation in “College Day” activities; and
( 3 ) Field trips for participants to observe and meet with persons who are employed in various career fields and can act as role models for participants.
( b ) Purchase of testing materials and test preparation programs for participants.
( c ) Fees required for admission applications for postsecondary education, college entrance examinations, or alternative education examinations if— ( 1 ) A waiver is unavailable; and
( 2 ) The fee is paid by the grantee to a third party on behalf of a participant.
( d ) In-service training of project staff.
( e ) Rental of space if— ( 1 ) Space is not available at the site of the grantee; and
( 2 ) The rented space is not owned by the grantee.
( f ) Purchase, lease, or rental of computer hardware, software, and other equipment, service agreements for such equipment, and supplies for participant development, project administration, or project recordkeeping.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-11 and 1070a-16)
[59 FR 2658, Jan. 18, 1994, as amended at 75 FR 65783, Oct. 26, 2010; 79 FR 76102, Dec. 19, 2014]
§ 390.41 What are allowable costs? ( a ) In addition to those allowable costs established in 34 CFR 75.530-75.562, the following items are allowable under short-term training projects: ( 1 ) Trainee per diem costs;
( 2 ) Trainee travel in connection with a training course;
( 3 ) Trainee registration fees; and
( 4 ) Special accommodations for trainees with handicaps.
( b ) The preparation of training materials may not be supported under a short-term training grant unless the materials are essential for the conduct of the seminar, institute, workshop or other short course for which the grant support has been provided.
(Authority: Section 12(c) and 302 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 772)
Summary: Unfounded Allegations of Improper Valuing and 

Underpaid Royalties by a Utility Company 

Report Date: April 23, 2020 Report Number: 19-0772 

We investigated allegations that a utility company improperly valued gas produced from Federal 

mineral leases and underpaid mineral royalties to the Office of Natural Resources Revenue 

(ONRR). 

We did not substantiate the allegations and found the utility company complied with Federal 

guidance when it calculated and paid Federal mineral royalties to ONRR. 

This is a summary of a report of investigation that was issued to the Acting Director of the 

Bureau of Land Management and the Director of ONRR. 

Office of Investigations | Office of Inspector General | U.S. Department of the Interior | Washington, DC
Exhibit  99.1

                       PARA MAS INTERNET, INC.
                     CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
                      18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,
                       AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
             SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of Para Mas Internet, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Don McFadyen, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of1934;  and
(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Don McFadyen
---------------------------------------
Don McFadyen
Principal  Executive  Officer
Principal  Financial  Officer
October 15,  2003

     A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  Para Mas Internet, Inc. and will be retained by Para Mas
Internet,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or  its  staff  upon  request.
#### Emily NYBERG, Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY WARD & COMPANY, a Corporation Admitted to do Business in the State of Michigan, Appellee.

No. 12340.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

April 28, 1955.

Doyle & Doyle, Menominee, Mich., for appellant.

Barstow & Barstoem, Menominee, Mich., John A. Barr, Chicago, 111., for appellee.

Before McALLISTER, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and arguments of counsel for the respective parties;

And it appearing that the plaintiff is a resident and citizen of Michigan, and that the defendant is an Illinois Corporation admitted to and doing business in the State of Michigan;

And the Court being of the opinion that the action was properly removed from the state court to the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan on the basis of diversity of *266citizenship of the parties and the amount in controversy, where it was tried with resulting judgment in favor of the defendant-appellee, and that the District Court was not in error in overruling appellant’s motion to set aside the judgment and to remand the case to the state court on the ground of lack of diversity of citizenship of the parties, for the reasons given by the District Judge in his written opinion;

It Is Ordered that the judgment of the District Court, 125 F.Supp. 116, be affirmed.
### §460nnn–61. Designation of Steens Mountain Wilderness Area

The Federal lands in the Cooperative Management and Protection Area depicted as wilderness on the map entitled "Steens Mountain Wilderness Area" and dated September 18, 2000, are hereby designated as wilderness and therefore as a component of the National Wilderness Preservation System. The wilderness area shall be known as the Steens Mountain Wilderness Area.

(Pub. L. 106–399, title II, §201, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1666.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 201 of Pub. L. 106–399. Section 201 also enacted provisions listed in a table of Wilderness Areas set out under section 1132 of this title.
### subpart 2—agricultural standards
12/2/2021

Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW data Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Delta Smelt Splittail Longfin Pumping

Daily Total 

Daily Combined Daily Combined Daily In CFS 

Total Daily 14-Day Total Daily 14-Day Total

SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N Total Average SWP CVP Total Average SWP Larval Yor N CVP Larval Yor N

1-May-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 N 0 N 307 805 1,112 608 

2-May-21 0N 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 4N 0Y 414 807 1,221 821 

3-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 N 369 803 1,172 731 

4-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 N 307 801 1,107 608 

5-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 4 N 307 801 1,108 608 

6-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 N 317 802 1,118 628 

7-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 N 268 800 1,068 531 

8-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4N 305 799 1,104 605 

9-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 300 800 1,100 596 

10-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 307 801 1,108 608 

11-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4N 307 802 1,108 608 

12-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 N 408 804 1,212 809 

13-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0N 416 806 1,222 825 14-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 N 309 807 1,115 612 

15-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0N 1,062 806 1,867 2,106 16-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 258 806 1,064 512 17-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0 806 806 0 18-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0 803 803 0 19-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0 800 800 0 20-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0 799 799 0 21-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N 0 796 796 0 22-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0N 229 797 1,026 455 23-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0N 229 797 1,026 455 

24-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0N 229 797 1,026 455 

25-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0N 234 799 1,033 465 

26-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 4 4 1 0 0N 321 801 1,122 637 

27-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 0 N 321 811 1,132 637 

28-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 N 321 802 1,123 637 

29-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0N 338 802 1,140 671 

30-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0N 282 801 1,083 560 

31-May-21 0 0N 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0N 188 799 987 373 

Total 0 0 0 XXXX 0 8 8 XXXX 292 12 8,652 24,856 33,507 17,161 

Official data is posted on CDFW's webpage.

CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

DELTA SMELT, SPLITTAIL and LONGFIN REPORT

MAY 2021

DATE

Banks Tracy Combined Banks
# Official Journal C 55A/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.055.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 55A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 535 March 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.055.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 55A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 535 March 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 055A/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — second supplement to the 28th complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2010/C 055A/01

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — second supplement to the 28th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Case 16-31288-KRH Doc 10 Filed 04/20/16 Entered 04/20/16 18:01:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 16-31288-KRH Doc 10 Filed 04/20/16 Entered 04/20/16 18:01:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 16-31288-KRH Doc 10 Filed 04/20/16 Entered 04/20/16 18:01:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 16-31288-KRH Doc 10 Filed 04/20/16 Entered 04/20/16 18:01:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 16-31288-KRH Doc 10 Filed 04/20/16 Entered 04/20/16 18:01:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 16-31288-KRH Doc 10 Filed 04/20/16 Entered 04/20/16 18:01:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 16-31288-KRH Doc 10 Filed 04/20/16 Entered 04/20/16 18:01:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 16-31288-KRH Doc 10 Filed 04/20/16 Entered 04/20/16 18:01:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 16-31288-KRH Doc 10 Filed 04/20/16 Entered 04/20/16 18:01:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 16-31288-KRH Doc 10 Filed 04/20/16 Entered 04/20/16 18:01:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
### §§148 to 150. Repealed. June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §651(a)(1), 46 Stat. 762, eff. June 18, 1930

Sections, act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title III, §§311, 312, 42 Stat. 938–940, related to bonded manufacturing and smelting warehouses and enforcement provisions. Provisions of Tariff Act of 1930 corresponding to section 148, see section 1311 of this title; section 149, see section 1312; section 150, see section 1312.
§ 642.31 What are unallowable costs? Costs that may not be charged against a grant under this program include the following: ( a ) Research not directly related to the evaluation or improvement of the project.
( b ) Construction, renovation, or remodeling of any facilities.
( c ) Stipends, tuition fees, and other direct financial assistance to trainees other than those participating in internships.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-11 and 1070a-17)
[47 FR 17788, Apr. 23, 1982. Redesignated and amended at 75 FR 65774, Oct. 26, 2010]
§ 628.3 Under what conditions may an eligible institution designate a foundation as the recipient of an endowment challenge grant? An eligible institution may designate a foundation, which was established for the purpose of raising money for that institution, as the recipient of an endowment challenge grant if— ( a ) The institution assures the Secretary in its application that the foundation is legally authorized to receive the endowment fund corpus and to administer the endowment fund in accordance with the regulations in this part;
( b ) The foundation agrees to administer the endowment fund in accordance with the regulations in this part; and
( c ) The institution agrees to be liable for any violation by the foundation of any applicable regulation, including any violation resulting in monetary liability.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1065)
(PRIZE.)

#### *The Elsineur.*— Jones, *Claimant.*

Where an inspection and comparison of original documents is material to the decision of a prize cause, this court will order the original papers to be sent up from the court below. •

Appeal from the circuit court for the district of Georgia.

In this case, which was principally a question of fact, *Pinkney*and *Charleton,*for the claimant, stated, that the condemnation in the court below was partly grounded on a comparison of certain documents in this case, with a paper invoked from the Stackelburg, another prize cause brought from the same court: that comparison of hands can never be evidence in a court that has not the two writings before it; and that the original papers might be brought up from the court below, in tile same manner as the record is removed upon a writ of error in England.

The following order was made by the court:

In this case it is ordered, that the claimant make further proof respecting the letter dated at St. Barts, September 1st, 1813, and signed Jasper D. Blagge, which is now offered to the court; that he show where he received it, and why it has been So long suppressed. It is farther ordered, that the clerk of the circuit court for the district of Georgia, do, under *440the direction of the judges of that court, transmit, *by*some safe conveyance, *to*this *court) the original*papers following,. to wit, the Swedish registers of the Elsineur, of the Allemoo, and the Stackelburg; the burghei'’s brief to Peter Hofstrom and to Runnels, and the bill óf sale to Blagge. The claimant is also required to state the persons to whom the vessel arid cargo were consigned at Bath, in the voyages to that place, together with a detailed account of those voyages.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Richmond Division 

In re: CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., et al., Case No. 08-35653-KRH 

Debtors. Chapter 11 

(Jointly Administered) 

____________________________________ 

ALFRED H. SIEGEL, Trustee of the 

Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Adv. Pro. No. 19-03091-KRH 

UNITED STATES TRUSTEE PROGRAM, et al., 

Defendants. 

_____________________________________ 

ALFRED H. SIEGEL, Trustee of the 

Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Adv. Pro. No. 19-03060-KRH 

JOHN P. FITZGERALD, Acting United States 

Trustee for Region Four, 

Defendant. 

_____________________________________ 

ORDER CONSOLIDATING ADVERSARY PROCEEDINGS 

In the interest of judicial economy, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned 

adversary proceedings shall be CONSOLIDATED. All filings shall be made only in Siegel v. 

United States Trustee Program, Adv. Pro. No. 19-03091-KRH. 

Dated: September 12, 2022 /s/ Kevin R. Huennekens 

 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE 

 Entered on Docket: Sept 12 2022

Case 19-03091-KRH Doc 44 Filed 09/12/22 Entered 09/12/22 11:23:53 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
### [§837. Repealed. Pub. L. 91–452, title XI, §1106(b)(1), Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 960]

Section, Pub. L. 86–449, title II, §203, May 6, 1960, 74 Stat. 87, related to illegal use or possession of explosives and threats or false information concerning attempts to damage or destroy real or personal property by fire or explosives. See section 844 of this title.
#### § 609.40 What are the matching requirements?

If an institution receives a grant in excess of $500,000, it must spend non-Federal funds to meet the cost of at least 50 percent of the activities approved in its application.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1063b)
# j 1_ u-.,iGIN,.
., IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 24-0038
IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: BOBBY FRANCIS LOWRY V,

Petitioner and Appellant, and LYN DENISE WELCH HARMON,

Respondent and Appellee. 

# FILL-77) MAR -5 2024 Bowen Greenwoo Clerk of Suprer

ne State of Montan:urt ORDER

Before this Court is self-represented Appellant Bobby Francis Lowry V's "Motion for Copy ofDistrict Court Record/Motion for Extension" oftime to file his opening brief. Lowry requests that this Court provide him a copy ofthe record from the Lewis and Clark County District Court, where he initiated this civil proceeding. Lowry provides that he needs an additional thirty days. We observe that, while he may proceed on appeal without paying the filing fee, Lowry is not entitled to a copy ofthe record without payment. Sections 25-10-404 and 25-1-201(1)(d),MCA. Upon reviewofthe court record on file here, only seven documents comprise the record. Though Lowry's Notice ofAppeal indicates that he is appealing a January 5, 2024 finaljudgment or order ofthe District Court, the record contains no such order. Lowry initiated the underlYing case in February 2022 when he filed a petition for dissolution without children, proposed property distribution, and motion to proceed without paying the filing fees. The court granted his motion. Lowry sent a letter to the court in July 2022, and then requested this Court to take supervisory control regarding the dissolution matter and other civil cases he had filed. Lowry v. FirstJudicialDist. Ct., No. OP 22-0617, Order dismissing writ of supervisory control (Mont. Nov. 15, 2022). We 03/05/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0038dismissed his petition, statingthat "Lowry has presented no information or documentsthat

he actually served the parties with the copies of the construction liens or complaints." Order, at 2. The record on appeal here reveals that Lowry never served the opposing party with hisFebruary 2022 filings. There is a December 7, 2022 e-mail to the Clerk ofDistrict Court from a Lewis and Clark County Detention Officer, attaching a list ofquestions from Lowry, including a question about service ofprocess. The record does not reflect whether the clerk responded, but there is no indication that service was accomplished. There is consequently no action the District Court hastaken or may take on hispleadings, and there is no order or finaljudgment from which Lowry may appeal. IT ISTHEREFORE ORDERED thatthis appeal isDISMISSED with prejudice and this matter is CLOSED as ofthis Order's date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Lowry's Motion for Copy of District Court Record/Motion for Extension ofTime is DENIED. The Clerk is directed toprovide a copy ofthis Orderto all parties attheir last known addresses. `7-1, -, DATED this S

- day ofMarch, 2024.
," '

- ChiefJustice 

# ,-)-ec/2- r-i i-- 

# / 

# _4,„hacf

2
Case 17-12431-KHK Doc 26 Filed 07/25/17 Entered 07/26/17 16:50:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 12
Case 17-12431-KHK Doc 26 Filed 07/25/17 Entered 07/26/17 16:50:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 12
Case 17-12431-KHK Doc 26 Filed 07/25/17 Entered 07/26/17 16:50:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 12
Case 17-12431-KHK Doc 26 Filed 07/25/17 Entered 07/26/17 16:50:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 12
Case 17-12431-KHK Doc 26 Filed 07/25/17 Entered 07/26/17 16:50:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 12
Case 17-12431-KHK Doc 26 Filed 07/25/17 Entered 07/26/17 16:50:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 12
Case 17-12431-KHK Doc 26 Filed 07/25/17 Entered 07/26/17 16:50:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 12
Case 17-12431-KHK Doc 26 Filed 07/25/17 Entered 07/26/17 16:50:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 12
Case 17-12431-KHK Doc 26 Filed 07/25/17 Entered 07/26/17 16:50:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 12
Case 17-12431-KHK Doc 26 Filed 07/25/17 Entered 07/26/17 16:50:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 12
Case 17-12431-KHK Doc 26 Filed 07/25/17 Entered 07/26/17 16:50:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 11 of 12
Case 17-12431-KHK Doc 26 Filed 07/25/17 Entered 07/26/17 16:50:11 Desc Main

 Document Page 12 of 12
FIRST COURT OF APPEALS 

INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS 

You are expected to file the reporter’s record by the original due date. See Tex. R. App. P.35. If 

a reporter determines that the due date may not be met, please advise the Clerk of the Court of 

Appeals immediately in writing, stating the reason and the due date by which the record will be 

filed. Generally speaking, for good cause shown, the Court will grant no more than two 

extensions from the original record due date, each extension not to exceed 30 days in regular 

appeals and 10 days in accelerated appeals for a total period not to exceed 60 days in regular 

appeals and 20 days in accelerated appeals. 

 

Appellate Case Number: Trial Court Case Number: 

(1) Is there a Reporter's Record? Y N

(2) Are you the only court reporter involved in this appeal? Y N

If not, please provide the names and addresses of all other court

reporters below.

(3) Has the appellant requested that the reporter’s record be prepared or 

has the trial court ordered that the record be prepared?

 Y N

(4) Please select from the following options:

 A. The appellant has paid for the record.

 B. The appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record

 C. The appellant is appealing as indigent.

 D. The appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the

 record and is not appealing as indigent.

(5) Extension (fill out if extension is required for any reason other than payment)

I was unable to file the record in this appeal by ________. I expect the record 

in this appeal to be approximately _______ pages. The record covers 

_______days of testimony. I believe that I can file the record by _________. I 

ask that the court grant an extension until that time for filing the record.

Additional Comments: ___________________________________________

Court Reporter's Signature, Full Address, Email Address and Telephone Number:

_______________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 11/10/2015 9:45:42 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
| | EXHIBIT 32.1 | 
| | ------------ | 

|
|

| | CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 | 
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

|In connection with the Quarterly Report of ICrystal, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Loflin, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), that:
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|
|

|Dated: August 20, 2004. | /s/ DAVID LOFLIN | 
|----------------------- | ---------------- | 

| | David Loflin President | 
| | ---------------------- |