alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 528

 529

 568

 624

 722

 666

 681

 694

 742

 751

 663

 668

 672

 588

 615

 671

 672

 667

 690

 584

 674

 676

 654

 700

 680

 639

 636

 642

 618

 522

 514

 514

 511

 486

 483

 563

 611

 591

 546

 502

 542

 557

 560

 537

 527

 439

 486

 444

 475

 465

 471

 456

 495

 524

 582

 578

 543

 535

 499

 492

 522

 521

 537

 542

 634

 602

 646

 641

 672

 620

 594

 599

 612

 578

 581

 560

 563

 559

 586

 532

 551

 523

 561

 609

 636

 610

 602

 587

 539

 503

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 2, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 339

 338

 348

 351

 408

 388

 415

 412

 431

 399

 383

 386

 394

 373

 375

 362

 364

 361

 378

 345

 357

 339

 363

 392

 409

 393

 388

 379

 349

 327

TOTAL 17,422

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
§ 648.52 What is the amount of the institutional payment? ( a ) For academic year 1998-1999, the amount of the institutional payment received by an institution of higher education for each student awarded a fellowship at the institution is $10,222. Thereafter, the Secretary adjusts the amount of the institutional payment annually in accordance with inflation as determined by the United States Department of Labor's Consumer Price Index for the previous calendar year. The Secretary announces the amount of the institutional payment in a notice published in the Federal Register.
( b ) The institutional allowance paid under paragraph (a) of this section is reduced by the amount the institution charges and collects from a fellowship recipient for tuition and other expenses as part of the recipient's instructional program.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1135d)
[58 FR 65842, Dec. 16, 1993, as amended at 64 FR 13487, Mar. 18, 1999]
United States Bankruptcy Court 

Eastern District of Virginia 

________________ Division 

In re: 

Case Number ________________ 

Debtor(s) Chapter ____

ORDER

A hearing was held on ______________________, due to the debtor’s(s’) failure to timely cure 

outstanding deficiency(ies). 

 The debtor(s) appeared at the hearing. 

 The debtor(s) did not appear at the hearing. 

 Counsel for the debtor(s) appeared at the hearing. 

For the reasons stated on the record from the bench, the Court ORDERS: 

 The case shall go forward and not be dismissed. 

 The debtor(s) shall cure the following deficiency(ies) on or before ____________________

see attached Exhibit A: 

Failure to timely cure each deficiency listed above PD\ result in the above-captioned bankruptcy 

case being dismissed without further notice or hearing. 

 The case is DISMISSED because the debtor(s) failed to appear at the hearing; and it is further 

 The case is DISMISSED; and it is further 

ORDERED that the debtor(s) pay the balance of the filing fee in the amount of 

$______________ to the Clerk of Court within 14 days of the date of this order; and it is further 

ORDERED that dismissal of this case revests the property of the estate in the entity in which 

such property was vested immediately before the commencement of the case. The trustee need not file 

a final report unless property or money was administered. 

Date: ____________________ _________________________________

United States Bankruptcy Judge

NOTICE OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER 

ENTERED ON DOCKET: ___________________ 

[opursdefhrg ver. 11/19] 

Norfolk

Jerome Delano Daniels

19-74580-FJS

13

January 14, 2020

✔

✔

310.00

Jan 14 2020 /s/ Frank J. Santoro

Jan 17 2020

Case 19-74580-FJS Doc 29 Filed 01/17/20 Entered 01/17/20 14:58:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Summary: Athletic Program Officials Allegedly Misappropriated or 

Embezzled Federal Funds at Tribal School 

Report Date: May 4, 2020 Report Number: 19-0460 

We investigated allegations that two athletic program officials at a tribal school misappropriated 

or embezzled Federal funds. 

We were unable to prove or disprove whether Federal funds were misappropriated or embezzled 

due to poor internal record keeping. We found that although there were standard operating 

procedures for the withdrawing of funds from the athletic department’s bank account, the 

officials failed to follow those procedures. 

One of the school officials left the Department and the other official was reassigned to duties at 

the school not dealing with funds. 

This is a summary of an investigative report we provided to the Directors of the Bureau of Indian 

Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education. 

Office of Investigations | Office of Inspector General | U.S. Department of the Interior | Washington, DC
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 13,481

 13,663

 12,544

 13,517

 12,133

 7,027

 11,504

 13,016

 14,025

 14,197

 13,643

 13,043

 13,011

 11,936

 12,567

 11,816

 11,182

 9,642

 10,191

 10,573

 11,892

 12,525

 12,070

 13,207

 14,398

 14,843

 14,104

 13,831

 13,942

 12,996

 11,837

 3,384

 3,686

 3,552

 3,923

 3,249

 3,347

 3,255

 4,809

 5,206

 6,112

 5,841

 4,698

 4,359

 4,341

 5,218

 6,039

 5,396

 5,083

 4,613

 5,077

 4,832

 4,563

 5,489

 3,793

 4,244

 4,595

 4,742

 2,624

 3,811

 3,817

 4,156

 7,612

 7,247

 7,143

 7,600

 7,162

 5,281

 7,287

 8,188

 9,078

 9,776

 8,974

 8,390

 7,962

 8,014

 8,767

 8,839

 8,251

 7,231

 7,322

 7,355

 7,755

 8,604

 8,294

 8,112

 8,702

 9,512

 8,856

 6,607

 8,288

 7,944

 7,504

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 14, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
(No. 7082

#### St. Therese Hospital, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 26, 1973.*

St. Therese Hospital, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*213Per Curiam. .
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Beacon Power Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, F.
William Capp, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ F. William Capp
-------------------
F. William Capp
Chief Executive Officer

November 12, 2004
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Brian P. Kelley, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of North American Van Lines, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date
November 14, 2003

/s/BRIAN P. KELLEYBrian P. Kelley
Chief Executive Officer


---

QuickLinks
### §698m–3. Status of Big Cypress National Preserve and Addition; report to Congress; plan

Not later than two years after April 29, 1988, the Secretary shall submit to the Congress a detailed report on, and further plan for, the preserve and Addition including—

(1) the status of the existing preserve, the effectiveness of past regulation and management of the preserve, and recommendations for future management of the preserve and the Addition;

(2) a summary of the public's use of the preserve and the status of the access points developed pursuant to section 698m–2 of this title;

(3) the need for involvement of other State and Federal agencies in the management and expansion of the preserve and Addition;

(4) the status of land acquisition; and

(5) a determination, made in conjunction with the State of Florida, of the adequacy of the number, location, and design of the recreational access points on I–75/Alligator Alley for access to the Big Cypress National Preserve, including the Addition.

The determination required by paragraph (5) shall incorporate the results of any related studies of the State of Florida Department of Transportation and other Florida State agencies. Any recommendation for significant changes in the approved recreational access points, including any proposed additions, shall be accompanied by an assessment of the environmental impact of such changes.

(Pub. L. 93–440, §11, as added Pub. L. 100–301, §6, Apr. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 446.)
```

[Federal Register: June 2, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 105)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 30710-30711]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02jn10-10]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[R05-OAR-2009-0731; FRL-9157-9

 
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Wisconsin; Particulate Matter Standards; Withdrawal of Direct Final 
Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to the receipt of an adverse comment, EPA is withdrawing 
the April 8, 2010 (75 FR 17865), direct final rule approving 
Wisconsin's update to its state ambient air quality standards. The 
updates were made to the particulate matter standards by adding fine 
particulate standards and revoking the state's course particulate 
standards. The State of Wisconsin submitted this revision as a 
modification to the State Implementation Plan on September 11, 2009. In 
the direct final rule, EPA stated that if adverse comments were 
submitted by May 10, 2010, the rule would be withdrawn and not take 
effect. On May 7, 2010, EPA received a comment. EPA believes this 
comment is adverse and, therefore, EPA is withdrawing the direct final 
rule. EPA will address the comment in a subsequent final action based 
upon the proposed action also published on April 8, 2010 (75 FR 17894). 
EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.

DATES: The direct final rule published at 75 FR 17865 on April 8, 2010, 
is withdrawn as of June 2, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Rau, Environmental Engineer, 
Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson

[[Page 30711]]

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6524, 
rau.matthew@epa.gov.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: May 14, 2010.
Walter W. Kovalick,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
Accordingly, the amendment to 40 CFR 52.2570 published in the Federal 
Register on April 8, 2010 (75 FR 17865) on pages 17867-17868 is 
withdrawn as of June 2, 2010.

[FR Doc. 2010-13175 Filed 6-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent to grant to Quest Integrated, Inc. a revocable, nonassignable, exclusive license to practice in the fields of use of cable, guy wire and other structural wire rope inspections in the United States and its territories, for the Government-owned invention represented by U.S. Statutory Invention Registration No. 13/038,574 entitled, “Onboard Data Recorder for a Nondestructive Test Wire Rope Sensor Head” (Navy Case No. 100986).

# DATES:

Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later than April 14, 2011.

# ADDRESSES:

Written objections are to be filed with the NAVFAC-ESC, Code CI60, 1100 23rd Avenue, Port Hueneme, CA 93043-4370 attention Kurt Buehler.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kurt Buehler, Technology Transfer Office, NAVFAC-ESC, Code CI60, 1100 23rd Avenue, Port Hueneme, CA 93043-4370, telephone: 805-982-1225. Due to U.S. Postal delays, please fax: 805-982-3481, e-mail:                         *kurt.buehler@navy.mil*                         or use courier delivery to expedite response.                    

(Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.)

Dated: March 23, 2011.

D.J. Werner,

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2011-7422 Filed 3-29-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,879,929
<SECURITIES>                                 3,566,887
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,412,205
<ALLOWANCES>                                   453,600
<INVENTORY>                                  4,166,890
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,400,574
<PP&E>                                       9,615,856
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,674,284
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,418,853
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,519,430
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,751
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,570,792
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,418,853
<SALES>                                     35,432,551
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,432,551
<CGS>                                       31,358,303
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               33,973,643
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (1,250,466)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,458,908
<INCOME-TAX>                                   547,759
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            960,730
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   960,730
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .246
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .235


</TABLE>
### [§1738. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–578, §4, Dec. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 3076]

Section, added Pub. L. 97–398, §4(a), Dec. 31, 1982, 96 Stat. 2011; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147, related to mailing private identification documents without a disclaimer.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective 90 days after Dec. 28, 2000, see section 5 of Pub. L. 106–578, set out as an Effective Date of 2000 Amendment note under section 1028 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 447

 473

 408

 452

 414

 415

 454

 435

 444

 476

 526

 550

 571

 552

 534

 519

 533

 544

 563

 553

 560

 543

 541

 548

 518

 543

 518

 479

 494

 487

 335

 333

 324

 335

 322

 331

 342

 344

 343

 361

 377

 365

 432

 410

 420

 392

 441

 452

 422

 425

 415

 424

 433

 429

 422

 447

 422

 392

 424

 409

 384

 385

 371

 384

 378

 380

 394

 386

 400

 419

 460

 462

 475

 475

 486

 488

 506

 515

 511

 502

 500

 502

 492

 488

 483

 487

 468

 449

 465

 453

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:October 19, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 253

 254

 245

 253

 250

 251

 259

 255

 263

 275

 300

 302

 310

 310

 316

 318

 329

 334

 332

 326

 325

 326

 320

 318

 314

 317

 305

 293

 303

 296

TOTAL 13,548

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,006

 1,010

 1,034

 1,060

 1,042

 1,026

 998

 971

 1,015

 1,041

 1,076

 1,083

 998

 1,098

 1,165

 1,141

 1,065

 1,104

 1,016

 1,108

 1,033

 1,053

 991

 965

 855

 834

 777

 720

 709

 713

 773

 588

 602

 609

 606

 607

 609

 615

 666

 663

 663

 669

 656

 657

 684

 673

 673

 687

 678

 674

 672

 635

 680

 668

 554

 525

 503

 523

 555

 595

 600

 581

 750

 756

 778

 801

 817

 831

 829

 865

 869

 862

 891

 827

 797

 855

 872

 847

 838

 861

 802

 831

 770

 810

 787

 696

 633

 617

 618

 610

 630

 650

 661

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:February 2, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 480

 483

 497

 511

 521

 530

 528

 551

 553

 549

 567

 527

 509

 544

 555

 539

 534

 548

 512

 530

 492

 517

 502

 446

 407

 397

 398

 393

 405

 418

 424

TOTAL 24,061

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
#### Henry Leerburger, Appellant, v. Henry R. C. Watson, as Executor, etc., of William Watson, Deceased, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
**Exhibit32**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in hiscapacity as an officer of Watson Wyatt Worldwide, Inc. (the “company”), forpurposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

·                  TheQuarterly Report of the company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

·                  Theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the company.

Date: May 10, 2007
| /s/ John J. Haley                     |   |    |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------------|
| John J. Haley                         |   |         |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |         |
|                                       |        |              |  |

 
| /s/ Carl D. Mautz                           |   |    |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|--------------|
| Carl D.  Mautz                              |   |         |
| Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |   |         |
|                                             |        |              |  |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Watson WyattWorldwide, Inc. and will be retained by Watson Wyatt Worldwide, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
§ 200.10 Applicability of a State's academic assessments to private schools and private school students. ( a ) Nothing in § 200.1 or § 200.2 requires a private school, including a private school whose students receive services under subpart A of this part, to participate in a State's academic assessment system.
( b ) ( 1 ) If an LEA provides services to eligible private school students under subpart A of this part, the LEA must, through timely consultation with appropriate private school officials, determine how services to eligible private school students will be academically assessed and how the results of that assessment will be used to improve those services.
( 2 ) The assessments referred to in paragraph (b)(1) of this section may be the State's academic assessments under § 200.2 or other appropriate academic assessments.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 6320, 7886(a))
[67 FR 45043, July 5, 2002]
No. 16,060.

#### Auto Sales Company *v.*General Credit Corporation.

(195 P. [2d] 392)

Decided June 14, 1948.

Mr. Lawrence Thulemeyer, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. G. S. Cosand, for defendant in error.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed en banc without written opinion, Mr. Justice Alter not participating.