alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §290. Discharge papers withheld by claim agent

Whoever, being a claim agent, attorney, or other person engaged in the collection of claims for pay, pension, or other allowances for any soldier, sailor, or marine, or for any commissioned officer of the military or naval forces, or for any person who may have been a soldier, sailor, marine, or officer of the regular or volunteer forces of the United States, or for his dependents or beneficiaries, retains, without the consent of the owner or owners thereof, or refuses to deliver or account for the same upon demand duly made by the owner or owners thereof, or by their agent or attorney, the discharge papers of any such soldier, sailor, or marine, or commissioned officer, which may have been placed in his hands for the purpose of collecting said claims, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both; and shall be debarred from prosecuting any such claim in any department or agency of the United States.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 699; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(G), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on section 100 of title 31, Money and Finance, section 130 of title 38, Pensions, Bonuses, and Veterans' Relief, and section 841 of title 43, Public Lands, all U.S.C., 1940 ed. (May 21, 1872, ch. 178, 17 Stat. 137).

Words "deemed guilty of a misdemeanor" were deleted as unnecessary. (See definition of "misdemeanor" in section 1 of this title.)

Words "and shall upon conviction, be" were omitted as surplusage since punishment can follow only after conviction.

To clarify meaning of "executive department" word "executive" before "department" was deleted and words "or agency" were inserted after it. (See definitions of "department" and "agency" in section 6 of this title.)

Words "bounty", before "pension", and "or land warrant", before "of any such soldier", were deleted as obsolete. According to regulations, Circular 1151, January 8, 1929, issued by the Secretary of the Interior and the General Land Office (see 43 CFR 131.1–131.2) "warrants for bounty lands were and are issued by the Commissioner of Pensions (Administrator of Veterans' Affairs) for services in wars or battles prior to March 3, 1855 only." Further, it is stated that "Warrants can not now be 'located' upon the public lands. The locating privilege was denied except in the state of Missouri after the passage of the act of March 2, 1889 (25 Stat. 854; 43 U.S.C. §700), and there are no lands known to the General Land Office to be subject to warrant location in Missouri."

Words "and honorably discharged" were omitted as unnecessary and words "or for his dependents or beneficiaries" were inserted after "United States" so as to embrace an important class of persons who employ attorneys or agents in the collection of claims permitted by statute.

Minor changes of phraseology were also made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $500".
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, Appellant, against William S. Miller, as President of the Tax Commission of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

*717No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-3344

_____________

Patricia Peters, *

*

Plaintiff - Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Marvin Runyon, in his official *

capacity as Postmaster General of the *

United States, *

* Appeal from the United States

Defendant - Appellee, * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Pat Barba, in her individual and *

official capacity as Manager of * [UNPUBLISHED]

Customer Service, Kansas City Area *

United States Postal Service; James *

Wood, in his individual and official *

capacity as Postmaster, Kansas City, *

Missouri; Phil Stabler, in his *

individual and official capacity as *

Manager of Customer Service, Kansas *

City Area, United States Postal Service, *

*

Defendants. *

_____________

Submitted: March 10, 1998

Filed: March 18, 1998

_____________
The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western

1

District of Missouri.

-2-

Before BOWMAN, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD,

Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

The District Court dismissed plaintiff's employment-discrimination complaint

1

for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff appeals. Finding no error of law, we

affirm on the basis of the District Court's thorough and well-reasoned opinion. See 8th

Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10b5

                        HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
                     EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

                   (As Established Effective January 1, 1982)


                                Fourth Amendment


                 Houston Industries Incorporated, a Texas corporation (the
"Company"), having adopted the Houston Lighting & Power Company Executive
Incentive Compensation Plan, as established effective January 1, 1982 (the
"Plan"), and having reserved the right under Section 13 thereof to amend the
Plan, does hereby amend the first paragraph of the Plan, effective August 6,
1997, to read as follows:

                 "Houston Lighting & Power Company, a Texas corporation, and
         any successor thereto (the "Company"), hereby establishes and adopts
         the following Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (the "Plan"):"

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused these presents to be
executed by its duly authorized officers in a number of copies, all of which
shall constitute one and the same instrument, which may be sufficiently
evidenced by any executed copy hereof, this 26th day of February 1998, but
effective as of August 6, 1997.

                                    HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED



                                    By  /s/ LEE W. HOGAN
                                      --------------------------------------
                                      Name: Lee W. Hogan
                                           ---------------------------------
                                      Title: Executive Vice President
                                            --------------------------------

ATTEST:

/s/ RICHARD B. DAUPHIN
-----------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Office of Nonproliferation and International Security, Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

Proposed subsequent arrangement.

# SUMMARY:

This notice is being issued under the authority of section 131a. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. The Department is providing notice of a proposed subsequent arrangement under Article X paragraph 3 of the Agreement for Cooperation Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Korea Concerning Civil Uses of Atomic Energy and the Agreement for Cooperation Between the United States of America and the Argentine Republic Concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy.

# DATES:

This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than April 13, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Sean Oehlbert, Office of Nonproliferation and International Security, National Nuclear Security Administration, Department of Energy. Telephone: 202-586-3806 or e-mail:                         *Sean.Oehlbert@nnsa.doe.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This subsequent arrangement concerns the retransfer of 9.2 kilograms of U.S.-origin atomized depleted uranium-8wt. % molybdenum powder, 0.3 percent enrichment, from Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) in Daejeon, South Korea to Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica (CNEA) in Buenos Aires, Argentina. The material, which is currently located at and prepared by KAERI, will be used for qualification testing of plate-type nuclear fuel as part of a Reduced Enrichment for Research and Test Reactors (RERTR) program by CNEA. The material was originally obtained by KAERI from Italy under contract number L615/0773.

In accordance with section 131a. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, it has been determined that this subsequent arrangement concerning the retransfer of nuclear material of United States origin will not be inimical to the common defense and security.

Dated: March 8, 2011.

For the Department of Energy.

Anne M. Harrington,

Deputy Administrator, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation.

[FR Doc. 2011-7329 Filed 3-28-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
#### Martin J. Kelly, Appellant, v. Bridie Kelly, Respondent.

No opinion. Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
TO: Distribution Transformers Negotiation Committee 

FROM: Navigant on behalf of DOE 

DATE: Monday, 07 November 2011 

RE: Updates to the Analytical Methodology since meetings of 12-14 October 

Navigant has made several changes to the engineering analyses in response to manufacturersupplied design details. 

Liquid-Immersed (Design Lines 1-5): 

(no changes) 

Medium-Voltage Dry-Type (Design Lines 11 and 12 only): 

• New design option combination (M4 Al Al step-lap miter) 

• Adjusted material prices for M6 and worse (see table below) 

• Revised labor estimates 

• Modified estimates of losses to reflect those of substation-style units 

Low-Voltage Dry-Type (Design Lines 6-8): 

• New design option combination (M6 Al Al full miter) for design line 8 

• Adjusted material prices for M6 and worse (see table below) 

• Revised labor estimates 

• Limited core construction type to Stacked core to improve comparisons(amorphous 

excepted) 

• Deleted step-lapping as a design option for design line 6 

• Created per-pound cost adders for both full mitering and step-lapping 

• Reduced induction upper bound limit in design line 7 

Dry-Type Material Price Changes 

Material for Dry-type Original Current 

M36 core steel (26 gauge) $ 0.66 $ 0.60 

M19 core steel (26 gauge) $ 0.91 $ 0.83 

M12 core steel $ 1.03 $ 0.95 

M6 core steel $ 1.46 $ 1.33 

M5 core steel $ 1.51 $ 1.38 

M4 core steel $ 1.59 $ 1.45
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 14968]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6415]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9282-7]


Proposed CERCLA Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement; Eugenio 
Painting Company

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 122(i) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended 
(``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed 
administrative settlement for recovery of past response costs 
concerning the Industrial Street Drum Site in Dearborn, Michigan with 
the following settling party: Eugenio Painting Company. The settlement 
requires the settling party to pay $20,000 to the Hazardous Substance 
Superfund. The settlement includes a covenant not to sue the settling 
party pursuant to Section 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9607(a). For 
thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this notice, the 
Agency will receive written comments relating to the settlement. The 
Agency will consider all such comments received and may modify or 
withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose 
facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

DATES: Written comments on the proposed settlement must be received by 
EPA's designee on or before close of business on April 18, 2011 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments should reference the Industrial Street Drum Site 
and should be addressed to Robert H. Smith, U.S. EPA, 77 W. Jackson 
Blvd (C-14J), Chicago, IL 60604-3590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert H. Smith, U.S. EPA, 77 W. 
Jackson Blvd (C-14J), Chicago, IL 60604-3590, 312-886-0765. A copy of 
the proposed settlement and the Agency's response to any comments 
received may be obtained from the above contact as well. Additional 
background information relating to the settlement is available for 
review at the EPA's Region 5 Office of Regional Counsel.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 9601-9675.

    Dated: March 2, 2011.
Douglas E. Ballotti,
Acting Director, Superfund Division, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2011-6415 Filed 3-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
§ 200.72 Procedures for adjusting allocations determined by the Secretary to account for eligible LEAs not on the Census list. ( a ) *General.* For each LEA not on the Census list (hereinafter referred to as a “new” LEA), an SEA must determine the number of formula children and the number of children ages 5 to 17, inclusive, in that LEA.
( b ) *Determining LEA eligibility.* An SEA must determine basic grant, concentration grant, targeted grant, and education finance incentive grant eligibility for each new LEA and re-determine eligibility for the LEAs on the Census list, as appropriate, based on the number of formula children and children ages 5 to 17, inclusive, determined in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Adjusting LEA allocations.* An SEA must adjust the LEA allocations calculated by the Secretary to determine allocations for eligible new LEAs based on the number of formula children determined in paragraph (a) of this section.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 6333-6337)
[82 FR 31711, July 7, 2017]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17968-17969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7539]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated August 13, 2010, and published in the Federal 
Register on September 1, 2010, 75 FR 53719, Cambrex Charles City, Inc., 
1205 11th Street, Charles City, Iowa 50616, made application by letter 
to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (GHB) (2010), a basic class 
of controlled substance listed in schedule I.
    The company plans to manufacture Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (GHB)

[[Page 17969]]

(2010) in bulk active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) form for 
distribution to the company's customers.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Cambrex Charles City, Inc. to manufacture the listed basic class of 
controlled substance is consistent with the public interest at this 
time. DEA has investigated Cambrex Charles City, Inc. to ensure that 
the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The 
investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance 
with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and 
history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance 
with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as 
a bulk manufacturer of the basic class of controlled substance listed.

     Dated: March 21, 2011.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-7539 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 529

 539

 521

 490

 470

 459

 439

 438

 460

 463

 481

 467

 463

 480

 477

 471

 475

 482

 495

 497

 477

 473

 464

 438

 386

 299

 187

 171

 155

 167

 177

 507

 522

 493

 476

 460

 435

 430

 432

 436

 444

 451

 455

 443

 454

 460

 464

 467

 473

 472

 456

 462

 456

 437

 394

 307

 189

 171

 155

 147

 153

 155

 517

 531

 503

 483

 465

 448

 435

 435

 443

 452

 464

 462

 455

 463

 466

 468

 471

 478

 483

 478

 470

 465

 451

 424

 350

 236

 179

 163

 152

 160

 166

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 336

 344

 327

 314

 303

 293

 285

 285

 290

 295

 303

 302

 297

 302

 304

 305

 307

 311

 314

 311

 306

 303

 295

 278

 232

 162

 127

 117

 110

 115

 119

TOTAL 12,616

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10-K AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       2,291,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,466,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   909,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,212,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,284,000
<PP&E>                                       1,732,000<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,093,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,239,000
<BONDS>                                        181,000<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,609,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,093,000
<SALES>                                     10,503,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,503,000
<CGS>                                        7,143,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,846,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,336,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,336,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)
<FN>
<F1>Net of depreciation.
<F2>Comprised of long-term debt.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.37

AMENDMENT 2002-1 TO  HILTON HOTELS  401(K) SAVINGS PLAN

The Pension and Thrift Committee (the "Committee") for Hilton Hotels Corporation hereby adopts the following amendment to the Hilton Hotels 401(k) Savings Plan
(the "Plan"):

1.    The
preamble to the Plan is amended by the addition of the following paragraph at the end thereof:



2.    The
first sentence of the definition of "Compensation" in Article I of the Plan is amended to read as follows effective January 1, 2001:



3.    Article I
of the Plan is amended by the addition of the following sentence at the end of the definition of "Employee" effective January 1, 1997:



4.    Sub-section (e)
of the definition of "Highly Compensated Employee" in Article I of the Plan is amended to read as follows effective
January 1, 1997:



5.    The
last sentence of Section 2.3 of the Plan is amended to read as follows effective December 12, 1994:



6.    Section 3.1
of the Plan is amended by the addition of the following sub-section (e) at the end thereof effective January 1, 2001:



1

---



7.    Section 3.2
of the Plan is amended by the addition of the following sub-section (d) at the end thereof effective January 1, 2001:



8.    Section 4.1
of the Plan is amended to read as follows effective January 1, 1995:



9.    Section 6.1(d)
of the Plan is amended to read as follows effective January 1, 1998:



10.  Section 6.7(b)
of the Plan is amended to read as follows effective January 1, 1997:



2

---

11.  Section 6.8(b)
of the Plan is amended to read as follows effective January 1, 1999:



12.  The
definition of "Section 415 Compensation" in Section A.1 of the Plan is amended to read as follows effective January 1, 1998:



13.  Section B.5(c)
of the Plan is amended by the addition of the following sentence at the end thereof effective January 1, 2000:



3

---

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Committee has caused this amendment to be executed this 12th day of June, 2002.

| |  | Hilton Hotels Corporation
Pension and Thrift Committee
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------
| |  | By:                                                   
| |  | By:                                                   
| |  | By:                                                   

4

---

QuickLinks
#### Luigi Criscuoli, Respondent, v. Flora Criscuoli, Appellant.

Motion for stay granted, on condition that defendant stipulate that plaintiff shall he relieved from the payment of alimony from the date of the granting of this motion until the decision of the appeal from the order granting a new trial; otherwise, motion denied. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 32.4

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code

I, Vasant Prabhu, the Chief Financial Officer of Starwood Hotels & Resorts
(Starwood), certify that (i) the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2003 (the Form 10-K) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Starwood.



| | /s/ Vasant Prabhu
Vasant Prabhu
Chief Financial Officer
Starwood Hotels &
Resorts
February 27, 2004
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------