alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications.
Title: Geochemical  reconnaissance of the Santa Rita Mountains, southeast of Tucson, Arizona

Link to: Report  |  Plate 1  | Plate 2

SuDocs No. I 19.3:1365

Item No. 0620

System No. 000996684 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  September 24,  2016  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov/
  |
|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 222.19 What other statutes and regulations apply to this part? ( a ) The following Federal statutes and regulations on nondiscrimination apply to assistance under this part: ( 1 ) The provisions of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub. L. 88-352) (prohibition of discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin), and the implementing regulations (34 CFR part 100). (Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2000d—2000d-4)
( 2 ) The provisions of title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Pub. L. 92-318) (prohibition of discrimination on the basis of sex), and the implementing regulations (34 CFR part 106). (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1681-1683)
( 3 ) The provisions of section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Pub. L. 93-112) (prohibition of discrimination on the basis of disability), and the implementing regulations (34 CFR part 104). (Authority: 29 U.S.C. 794)
( 4 ) The provisions of title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-336) (prohibition of discrimination on basis of disability), and any implementing regulations. (Authority: 42 U.S.C. 12101-12213)
( 5 ) The provisions of the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (Pub. L. 94-135) (prohibition of age discrimination), and any implementing regulations. (Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6101)
( b ) The following Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR): ( 1 ) Subparts A, E, F, and §§ 75.900 and 75.910 of 34 CFR part 75 (Direct Grant Programs) for payments under sections 8003(d) (payments for federally connected children with disabilities), 8007 (construction), and 8008 (school facilities), except for the following: ( i ) Section 75.603 does not apply to payments under section 8007 (construction) or section 8008 (school facilities).
( ii ) Section 75.605 does not apply to payments under section 8007 (construction).
( iii ) Sections 75.600-602, 75.604, and 75.606-617 apply to payments under section 8007 (construction) only to the extent that funds received under that section are used for major renovations or to construct new school facilities.
( 2 ) 34 CFR part 77 (Definitions that Apply to Department Regulations).
( 3 ) 34 CFR part 82 (New Restrictions on Lobbying).
( 4 ) 34 CFR part 84 (Governmentwide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Financial Assistance)).
( c ) 2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3485 (OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement)).
( d ) 2 CFR part 200, as adopted in 2 CFR part 3474 (Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards), for payments under sections 8003(d) (payments for federally connected children with disabilities), 8007 (construction), and 8008 (school facilities).
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3)
[60 FR 50778, Sept. 29, 1995. Redesignated at 62 FR 35412, July 1, 1997;79 FR 76095, Dec. 19, 2014; 80 FR 33162, June 11, 2015]
### §4086. Temporary safe-keeping of federal offenders by marshals

United States marshals shall provide for the safe-keeping of any person arrested, or held under authority of any enactment of Congress pending commitment to an institution.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 851.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§691, 692, (R.S. §§5537, 5538).

Said section 691 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., is superseded by sections 753b and 753c of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., which are incorporated in sections 4002, 4003 and 4042 of this title.

This section is rewritten to retain the intent of section 692 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., which was to insure a safekeeping of United States prisoners until their commitment or confinement in Federal penal institutions. The language conforms with that of said sections 692 and 753b.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Richmond Division

IN RE:

CICEL L. JOHNSON CHAPTER 13

Case No.: 19-30531-KLP

Debtor

Hearing: March 24, 2021

 9:10 a.m.

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

COMES NOW the undersigned, Wayne Barry Montgomery, Virginia State Bar

number 43042, and notes his appearance as counsel for HP Virginia I, LLC (“Home

Partners”), creditor in this action, to be heard on its Objection to the Confirmation of the

debtor’s amended chapter 13 plan (docket no. 98) filed in this case.

HP VIRGINIA I, LLC

/s/ W. Barry Montgomery

 Of Counsel

W. Barry Montgomery, Esquire (VSB# 43042)

KALBAUGH, PFUND & MESSERSMITH

Counsel for HP Virginia I, LLC

901 Moorefield Park Drive, Suite 200

Richmond, Virginia 23236

Tel: (804) 320-6300

Case 19-30531-KLP Doc 108 Filed 03/23/21 Entered 03/23/21 16:15:13 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
2

Fax: (804) 320-6312

E-mail: barry.montgomery@kpmlaw.com

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on the 23rd day of March, 2021, I did electronically file a

copy of the foregoing with the Clerk of this Court who then sent a Notice of Electronic

Filing (“NEF”) to:

James E. Kane, Esq. (VSB #30081)

KANE & PAPA, P.C.

1313 East Cary St.

Richmond, VA 23219

(804) 225-9500 (phone)

(804) 225-9598 (fax)

/s/ W. Barry Montgomery

 W. Barry Montgomery, Esquire (VSB# 43042)

KALBAUGH, PFUND & MESSERSMITH

HP Virginia I, LLC

901 Moorefield Park Drive, Suite 200

Richmond, Virginia 23236

Tel: (804) 320-6300

Fax: (804) 320-6312

E-mail: barry.montgomery@kpmlaw.com

Case 19-30531-KLP Doc 108 Filed 03/23/21 Entered 03/23/21 16:15:13 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 698

 694

 702

 687

 681

 688

 677

 736

 814

 699

 842

 826

 841

 813

 776

 796

 799

 810

 819

 809

 805

 813

 856

 876

 789

 881

 821

 1,066

 855

 785

 844

 450

 456

 455

 464

 471

 478

 490

 517

 519

 571

 574

 564

 608

 585

 585

 574

 528

 543

 572

 621

 620

 615

 602

 606

 622

 653

 549

 662

 548

 650

 575

 550

 568

 549

 551

 559

 558

 555

 620

 678

 618

 684

 618

 717

 677

 679

 661

 629

 666

 649

 718

 697

 702

 706

 728

 705

 751

 646

 961

 652

 723

 702

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 3, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 356

 367

 355

 357

 361

 361

 359

 399

 435

 398

 439

 398

 459

 434

 436

 424

 405

 428

 417

 460

 447

 450

 452

 466

 452

 480

 415

 610

 419

 463

 450

TOTAL 20,477

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
§ 270.3 Who may receive assistance under this program? ( a ) The recipient of a grant under this part may provide assistance only if requested by school boards or other responsible governmental agencies located in its geographic region.
( b ) The recipient may provide assistance only to the following persons: ( 1 ) Public school personnel.
( 2 ) Students enrolled in public schools, parents of those students, community organizations and other community members.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.16

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                              HFC CAPITAL TRUST II



     THIS CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF HFC CAPITAL TRUST II (the "Trust") is
     being duly executed and filed by the undersigned on behalf of the
     Trust to form a business trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act
     (12 Del C. sections 3801 et seq.) (the "Act").


          1.   Name. The name of the business trust being formed is HFC
               Capital Trust II.

          2.   Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of
               the Trust with a principal place of business in the
               State of Delaware is as follows:

                    Wilmington Trust Company
                    Rodney Square North
                    1100 North Market Street
                    Wilmington, DE 19890
                    ATTN: Corporate Trust Administration

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of
     Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a) of the Act.


                                       WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its
                                       individual capacity but solely as
                                       trustee of the Trust



                                       By: /s/ Donald G. MacKelcan
                                           --------------------------------
                                             Name: Donald G. MacKelcan
                                             Title:  Vice President
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Gay & Son Masonry, L.P.

, * From the 91st District

Court of Eastland County,

Trial Court No. CV1443262

.

Vs. No. 11

- 15

- 00001

- CV * February 19, 2015

Gorman Independent School District, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has considered Gay & Son Masonry, L.P.’s u nopposed motion to

dismiss its appeal with prejudice and concludes that the motion should be granted.

Therefore, in acco rdance with this court ’ s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The

costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed again st the party incurring same.
§ 361.240 What are the requirements for data validation of State annual performance reports? ( a ) States must establish procedures, consistent with guidelines issued by the Secretary of Labor or the Secretary of Education, to ensure that they submit complete annual performance reports that contain information that is valid and reliable, as required by WIOA sec. 116(d)(5).
( b ) If a State fails to meet standards in paragraph (a) of this section as determined by the Secretary of Labor or the Secretary of Education, the appropriate Secretary will provide technical assistance and may require the State to develop and implement corrective actions, which may require the State to provide training for its subrecipients.
( c ) The Secretaries of Labor and Education will provide training and technical assistance to States in order to implement this section. States must comply with the requirements of sec. 116(d)(5) of WIOA as explained in guidance.
(No. 73-CC-204

#### Huck Manufacturing Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 17, 1973.*

Huck Manufacturing Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*74Per Curiam.
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-121539, Form S-8 No. 333-112365, Form S-8 No. 333-72444 and Form S-8 No. 333-42904) pertaining to the California PizzaKitchen, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, the California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1998 Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plan and 1990 Employee Stock Option Plan of California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. of ourreports dated March 19, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. and Subsidiaries and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. includedin this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 3, 2010. 

/S/ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

March 19, 2010
#### § 386.30 What are the matching requirements?

The grantee is required to contribute at least ten percent of the total cost of a project under this program. However, if the grantee can demonstrate that it has insufficient resources to contribute the entire match but that it can fulfill all other requirements for receiving an award, the Secretary may waive part of the non-Federal share of the cost of the project after negotiations with Department staff.

(Authority: Section 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c))
§ 280.51 Application for mitigation or remission. ( a ) *When application may be filed.* An application for mitigation or remission of a fine may be filed as provided under § 280.12 of this part; or, within 30 days after the date of receipt of the district director's or the Associate Commissioner for Examinations, or the Director for the National Fines Office's decision to impose a fine whether or not the applicant responded to the Notice of Intention to Fine.
( b ) *Form and contents of application.* An application for mitigation or remission shall be filed in duplicate under oath and shall include information, supported by documentary evidence, as to the basis of the claim to mitigation or remission, and as to the action, if any, which may have been taken by the applicant, or as to the circumstances present in the case which, in the opinion of the applicant, justified the granting of his application.
( c ) *Disposition of application.* The application, if filed with the answer, shall be disposed of as provided in § 280.13. In any other case the application shall be considered and decided by the district director or the Associate Commissioner for Examinations, or the Director for the National Fines Office from whose decision an appeal may be taken to the Board as provided in 8 CFR part 1003.
[22 FR 9808, Dec. 6, 1957, as amended at 23 FR 9124, Nov. 26, 1958; 46 FR 28624, May 28, 1981; 54 FR 18649, May 2, 1989; 76 FR 74629, Dec. 1, 2011]
. 

July 9, 1970 

Hon. W. C. Lindsey 

Criminal District Attorney 

Jefferson County Courthouse 

Beaumont, Texas 

Dear Mr. Lindsey: 

Opinion No.M-657 

Re: Proper official to make 

delivery of county warrants 

and jury checks to the 

payee. 

Your request for our opinion asks the following question: 

'Which county official or officials are 

authorized to deliver/mail county warrants and 

county jury checks to the.payee?" 

Article 2122, Vernon's Civil Statutes, states that jurors' 

pay is to be made by a check drawn by the clerk of the district 

court of the county on the jury fund. 

Article 2554, Vernon's Civil Statutes, provides in part 

as follows: 

"It shall be the duty of the county treasurer 

upon the presentation to him of any warrant, check, 

voucher, or order drawn by the proper authority, 

if there be funds sufficient for the payment thereof 

on deposit in the account against which such warrant 

is drawn, to endorse upon the face of such instrument 

his order to pay the same to the payee named therein 

and to charge the same on his books to the fund upon 

which it is drawn. . .." 

Article 1632, Vernon's Civil Statutes, declares that, 

-3146- 
Hon. W. C. Lindsey, page 2 (M - 657) 

"The county treasurer or any other officer 

disbursing money for the county, or receiving 

county claims in payment of dues of any kind, shall 

require the party receiving payment of, or credit 

for the same, his agent or attorney, to receipt in 

writing upon the face of such claim for the amount 

so paid or received thereon." (Emphasis added.) 

Article 1709, Vernon's Civil Statutes, provides as follows: 

"The county treasurer shall receive all 

moneys belonging to the county from whatever 

source they may be derived, and pay and apply the 

same as required by law, in such manner as the 

commissioners court of his county may require and 

direct." (Emphasis added.) 

The above statutes, by necessary implication, authorize the 

county treasurer to make delivery of such warrants. 

In view of the foregoing, we agree with you that the county 

treasurer is the proper official to make delivery of county warrants 

to the payee. 

SUMMARY 

The county treasurer is the proper official 

authorized to make delivery of county warrants 

to the payee. 

/ 

C. MARTIN 

General of Texas 

Prepared by John Reeves 

Assistant Attorney General 

-'J147- 
. 

Hon. W. C. Lindsey, page 3 (M-657) 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

Kerns Taylor, Chairman 

W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman 

Milton Richardson 

Lehman Marks 

Malcom Smith 

Dan Green 

MEADE F. GRIFFIN 

Staff Legal Assistant 

ALFRED WALKER 

Executive Assistant 

NOLA WHITE 

First Assistant 

-3146-
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 31, 2017

p1023

Order 

Clerk

October 31, 2017

153709

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153709

COA: 331788

Hillsdale CC: 15-393642-FH

BRETT ANTHONY BOWDITCH,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

By order of November 30, 2016, the application for leave to appeal the April 5, 

2016 order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decisions in People 

v Steanhouse (Docket No. 152849) and People v Masroor (Docket Nos. 152946-8). On 

order of the Court, the cases having been decided on July 24, 2017, 500 Mich 453 (2017), 

the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 30.60 What costs does the Secretary impose on delinquent debtors? ( a ) The Secretary may charge a debtor for the costs associated with the collection of a particular debt. These costs include, but are not limited to— ( 1 ) Salaries of employees performing Federal loan servicing and debt collection activities;
( 2 ) Telephone and mailing costs;
( 3 ) Costs for reporting debts to credit bureaus;
( 4 ) Costs for purchase of credit bureau reports;
( 5 ) Costs associated with computer operations and other costs associated with the maintenance of records;
( 6 ) Bank charges;
( 7 ) Collection agency costs;
( 8 ) Court costs and attorney fees; and
( 9 ) Costs charged by other Governmental agencies.
( b ) Notwithstanding any provision of State law, if the Secretary uses a collection agency to collect a debt on a contingent fee basis, the Secretary charges the debtor, and collects through the agency, an amount sufficient to recover— ( 1 ) The entire amount of the debt; and
( 2 ) The amount that the Secretary is required to pay the agency for its collection services.
( c ) ( 1 ) The amount recovered under paragraph (b) of this section is the entire amount of the debt, multiplied by the following fraction:
( 2 ) In paragraph (c)(1) of this section, cr equals the commission rate the Department pays to the collection agency.
( d ) If the Secretary uses more than one collection agency to collect similar debts, the commission rate (cr) described in paragraph (c)(2) of this section is calculated as a weighted average of the commission rates charged by all collection agencies collecting similar debts, computed for each fiscal year based on the formula where— ( 1 ) Xi equals the dollar amount of similar debts placed by the Department with an individual collection agency as of the end of the preceding fiscal year;
( 2 ) Yi equals the commission rate the Department pays to that collection agency for the collection of the similar debts;
( 3 ) Z equals the dollar amount of similar debts placed by the Department with all collection agencies as of the end of the preceding fiscal year; and
( 4 ) N equals the number of collection agencies with which the Secretary has placed similar debts as of the end of the preceding fiscal year.
( e ) If a debtor has agreed under a repayment or settlement agreement with the Secretary to pay costs associated with the collection of a debt at a specified amount or rate, the Secretary collects those costs in accordance with the agreement.
( f ) The Secretary does not impose collection costs against State or local governments under paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3(a)(1) and 1226a-1, 31 U.S.C. 3711(e), 3717(e)(1), 3718))
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 29, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 29, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19I0106. LANDMARK URBAN CONSTRUCTION GA, LLC et al. v. MILLER 

MASONRY, L.L.C..

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2017CV297336
§ 385.45 What additional application requirements apply to the training of individuals for rehabilitation careers? ( a ) All applicants for a grant or contract to provide training shall demonstrate how the training they plan to provide will prepare rehabilitation professionals to address the needs of individuals with disabilities from minority backgrounds.
( b ) All applicants for a grant shall include a detailed description of strategies that will be utilized to recruit and train persons so as to reflect the diverse populations of the United States, as part of the effort to increase the number of individuals with disabilities, individuals who are members of minority groups, who are available to provide rehabilitation services.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0018) (Authority: Sections 21(a) and (b) and 302 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 718(a) and (b) and 772)