alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
O

c

h

o

c

o

N

a

tio

n

al F

o

r

e

s

t

L

o

o

k

o

u

t

M

o

u

n

t

ain

R

a

n

g

e

r

Dis

t

ric

t

M

a

p

8

o

f

1

7

Alt

e

r

n

a

tiv

e

3

-

F

u

els

T

r

e

a

t

m

e

n

t

s

See Sheet 6

S

P

E

A

R

S

D

R

A

F

T

EIS

26

722

983

734

172

882

981

982

875

546

883

824

515

934

861

844

803

510

108

137

202

922

928

120

874

740

139

109

898

850

818

863

562

314

722

100

203

807

704

751

511

805

208

708

559

830

921

124

879

144

311

901

845

148

211

535

813

207

143

567

196

924

859

866

835

521

840

837

189

851

542

192

532

811

538

107

804

184

888

312

303

920

501

700

821

572

113

193

812

190

703

738

125

860

112

832

734

175

315

741

842

111

776

838

550

115

214

310

742

701

300

977

565

873

551

747

723

828

520

127

772

313

981

304

815

316

209

101

744

743

903

836

902

727

118

212

133

188

867

141

104

748

186

508

198

519

134

174

923

136

809

129

972

829

135

880

126

895

752

512

301

206

210

886

980

806

181

110

302

871

513

825

896

555

503

893

119

509

570

969

534

819

891

843

865

854

537

824

166

834

522

155

173

571

887

841

505

566

506

739

142

171

926

810

823

530

961

900

514

151

862

831

820

964 105

568

138

531

114

719

117

930

884

814

808

833

517

191

885

187

931

400

917

185

306

894

518

816

929

544

817

968

918

973

569

967

1 6 5 4 3

8

9

7

9

4

7

5 4 3

9

8

8

5

7

7

8

6

9

7

2

9

8

8

9

1 3

7

6

5

2

6 4 3 2 6 5 4 1 3

1

1 2 4

1

3

5

6

2

11

28

36

25

11

30

16

27

33

11

27

18

33

11

29

25

23

32

13

22

12

14

17

24

15

26

20

31 35

34

28

28

30

29

32

26

10

34

21

29

34

32

34

26

19

17

33

10

25 29

33

15

29

31

33

17

35

35 31

10

34

22

15

28

19

33 36 32

28

15

27

22

32

16

21

16

21

12

30

13

32

20

16

31

10

30

18

10

30 27

20

12

31

27

28 27

15

25

18

23

14

26

34

17

24

18

18 17 16 14 16

14

36

36

15

12

35

13

10

17

29

13

31

18

30

36

19

25

12

24

36

25

12

13

13

2

11

11

22 23 24

26

35

21 21

35

23 20

14

22

23

19 24 19 19 20

14

21 22

26

24 20 23

19 20 21 22 23

Legend

Project Area

Township and Range

Sections

Non-Forest Service Lands

Travel Routes

Arterial

Collector

Local

State

County

Alternative 3

Prescribed Fire

Hand Piling 0 0.5 1 2 3

Miles

33

4/6/2007

T:\r06\och\lom\project\eis_spears_2006\gis\arcmap\map8 - Alt 3 Fuels Treatments.mxd

27

42

22

Information displayed on this map was derived from multiple sources.

This map is only for graphic display and general planning purposes.

Inquiries concerning information displayed on our maps, their sources,

and intended uses should be directed to:

Ochoco National Forest

3160 NE Third Street

Prineville, Oregon 97754

(541) 416-6500

This map has no warranties to its contents or accuracy.

R 17 E

T

12

S

R 18 E R 19 E R 20 E

T

13

S

T

14

S
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4127 — Edison/EDF Energia Italia)

(2006/C 254/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 31 August 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5070 

To provide access to Federal public benefits for individuals with criminal 

convictions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 13, 2019 

Ms. OCASIO-CORTEZ (for herself, Ms. MENG, Mr. CLAY, Ms. TLAIB, Mr. 

GARCI ́A of Illinois, and Ms. LEE of California) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To provide access to Federal public benefits for individuals 

with criminal convictions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘A Just Society: The 

5 Mercy In Re-entry Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FEDERAL PUBLIC BENEFIT ACCESSIBILITY FOR IN7 DIVIDUALS WITH CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi9 sion of law, an individual may not be denied any Federal 

10 public benefit solely on the basis that the individual was 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5070 IH

1 convicted of a criminal offense (whether under Federal, 

2 State, tribal, or foreign law). 

3 (b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the 

4 term ‘‘Federal public benefit’’ means— 

5 (1) any grant, contract, loan, professional li6 cense, or commercial license provided by an agency 

7 of the United States or by appropriated funds of the 

8 United States; and 

9 (2) any retirement, welfare, health, disability, 

10 public or assisted housing, postsecondary education, 

11 food assistance, unemployment benefit, or any other 

12 similar benefit for which payments or assistance are 

13 provided to an individual, household, or family eligi14 bility unit by an agency of the United States or by 

15 appropriated funds of the United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XXXVI
Project No. 13733-000.FFP Missouri 8, LLC
Project No. 13752-000.Solia 6 Hydroelectric, LLC
Project No. 13768-000.
 The Commission has received three preliminary permit applications deemed filed on May 18, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.,[1]
                    
                     for proposed projects to be located at the Army Corps of Engineers' Montgomery Lock and Dam on the Ohio River, in Beaver County, Pennsylvania. The applications were filed by Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XXXVI for Project No. 13733, FFP Missouri 8, LLC, for Project No. 13752, and Solia 6 Hydroelectric, LLC, for Project No. 13768.[2] On March 24, 2011, at 10 a.m. (eastern time), the Secretary of the Commission, or her designee, will conduct a random drawing to determine the filing priority of the applicants identified in this notice. The Commission will select among competing permit applications as provided in section 4.37 of its regulations.[3]
                    
                     The priority established by this drawing will be used to determine which applicant, among those with identical filing times, will be considered to have the first-filed application. The drawing is open to the public and will be held in room 2C, the Commission Meeting Room, located at 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426. A subsequent notice will be issued by the Secretary announcing the results of the drawing. Dated: March 15, 2011. Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., Deputy Secretary.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         Under the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, any document received after regular business hours is considered filed at 8:30 a.m. on the next regular business day. 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(2) (2010). Back to Citation
 2.
    
                         Montgomery Hydro, LLC, also filed a permit application to study the same site for Project No. 13792, which is deemed filed on May 19, 2010. Back to Citation
 3.
    
                         18 CFR 4.37 (2010). Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2011-6776 Filed 3-22-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Racing Capital, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


Date:    August 31, 2006           By:     /s/ D. Davy Jones
                                           -------------------------------------
                                   Name:   D. Davy Jones
                                   Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to American Racing Capital,
Inc. and will be retained by American Racing Capital, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 300.151 Adoption of State complaint procedures. ( a ) *General.* Each SEA must adopt written procedures for— ( 1 ) Resolving any complaint, including a complaint filed by an organization or individual from another State, that meets the requirements of § 300.153 by— ( i ) Providing for the filing of a complaint with the SEA; and
( ii ) At the SEA's discretion, providing for the filing of a complaint with a public agency and the right to have the SEA review the public agency's decision on the complaint; and
( 2 ) Widely disseminating to parents and other interested individuals, including parent training and information centers, protection and advocacy agencies, independent living centers, and other appropriate entities, the State procedures under §§ 300.151 through 300.153.
( b ) *Remedies for denial of appropriate services.* In resolving a complaint in which the SEA has found a failure to provide appropriate services, an SEA, pursuant to its general supervisory authority under Part B of the Act, must address— ( 1 ) The failure to provide appropriate services, including corrective action appropriate to address the needs of the child (such as compensatory services or monetary reimbursement); and
( 2 ) Appropriate future provision of services for all children with disabilities.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 1820-0030 and 1820-0600) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3)
### §1792. Mutiny and riot prohibited

Whoever instigates, connives, willfully attempts to cause, assists, or conspires to cause any mutiny or riot, at any Federal penal, detention, or correctional facility, shall be imprisoned not more than ten years or fined under this title, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 786; Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §1109(b), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2148; Pub. L. 99–646, §53(a), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3607; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(O), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §252 (May 18, 1934, ch. 303, §1, 48 Stat. 782).

Escape provisions of this section were incorporated in section 752 of this title.

Reference to persons causing, procuring, aiding and assisting was omitted. Such persons are principals under section 2 of this title.

Minor changes were made in translation and phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $25,000".

1986—Pub. L. 99–646 inserted ", detention," after "penal".

1984—Pub. L. 98–473 substituted provisions deleting prohibition on bringing dangerous instrumentalities into prison and inserted provision setting forth a maximum $25,000 fine.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Pub. L. 99–646, §53(b), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3607, provided that: "The amendment made by this section [amending this section] shall take effect 30 days after the enactment of this Act [Nov. 10, 1986]."
Order entered July 23 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00389
- CV
IN RE CHARLES ANTHONY ALLE N, Relator Original Proceeding from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV99
- 01573
- V



### O RDER Before the Court is relator’s pleading, which he styles a petition for bill of review, in which relator challenges this Court’s order dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus for want of jurisdiction. A bill of review, or a petiti on in the nature of a bill of review, is a proceeding in equity for the purpose of setting aside a prior judgment of the trial court. Fender v. Moss, 629 S.W.2d 192, 194 (Tex. App.

— Dallas), writ refused n.r.e. , 637 S.W.2d 922 (Tex. 1982); T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 329b(f) (“On expiration of the time within which the trial court has plenary power, a judgment cannot be set aside by the trial court except by bill of review for sufficient cause, filed within the time allowed by law.”). There is no comparable procedure for an out of time attack on the judgment of an appellate court. 1 Because this court’s plenary power over the order relator complains of has expired, T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 19.1(a), even if relator’s bill of

1 Motions for rehearing in original proceedings must be filed within 15 days after the final order is rendered. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.9 . Relator did not file a timely motion for rehearing.review presented valid reasons for reconsidering its decision, this Court would have no power to

set aside its order dismissing realtor’s petition for writ of habeas corpus for want of jurisdiction. See Cadle Co. v. Lobingier, 50 S.W.3d 662, 671 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 2001, pet. denied).
W e DISMISS relator ’s bill of review.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
### §1082. Gambling ships

(a) It shall be unlawful for any citizen or resident of the United States, or any other person who is on an American vessel or is otherwise under or within the jurisdiction of the United States, directly or indirectly—

(1) to set up, operate, or own or hold any interest in any gambling ship or any gambling establishment on any gambling ship; or

(2) in pursuance of the operation of any gambling establishment on any gambling ship, to conduct or deal any gambling game, or to conduct or operate any gambling device, or to induce, entice, solicit, or permit any person to bet or play at any such establishment,

if such gambling ship is on the high seas, or is an American vessel or otherwise under or within the jurisdiction of the United States, and is not within the jurisdiction of any State.

(b) Whoever violates the provisions of subsection (a) of this section shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

(c) Whoever, being (1) the owner of an American vessel, or (2) the owner of any vessel under or within the jurisdiction of the United States, or (3) the owner of any vessel and being an American citizen, shall use, or knowingly permit the use of, such vessel in violation of any provision of this section shall, in addition to any other penalties provided by this chapter, forfeit such vessel, together with her tackle, apparel, and furniture, to the United States.

(Added May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §23, 63 Stat. 92; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $10,000".
### §1508. Recording, listening to, or observing proceedings of grand or petit juries while deliberating or voting

Whoever knowingly and willfully, by any means or device whatsoever—

(a) records, or attempts to record, the proceedings of any grand or petit jury in any court of the United States while such jury is deliberating or voting; or

(b) listens to or observes, or attempts to listen to or observe, the proceedings of any grand or petit jury of which he is not a member in any court of the United States while such jury is deliberating or voting—

shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

Nothing in paragraph (a) of this section shall be construed to prohibit the taking of notes by a grand or petit juror in any court of the United States in connection with and solely for the purpose of assisting him in the performance of his duties as such juror.

(Added Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 879, §1, 70 Stat. 935; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §601(f)(13), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3500.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–294 realigned margins for provisions beginning "shall be fined" and ending "one year, or both."

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000" in par. following par. (b).
Order entered February 12, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 00086 - CR No. 05 - 14 - 00087 - CR JOSEPH JULIAN GUERRA , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219 - 82353 - 2012 , 219 - 81886 - 2013



### O RDER The Court GRANTS appellant’s February 7, 2014 motion to substitute counsel. Christian T. Souza is substituted for Hunter A. Biederman as appellant’s counsel of record. We DIRECT the Clerk to send all correspondence to Christian T. Souza , 4303 N. Central Expressway, Dallas, Texas 75 205 ; telephone: ( 214 ) 862

- 7462; facsimile: (214) 696

- 0867

. /s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph GANTT, Jr., a/k/a Jerome Michael Gantt, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-4753.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 24, 2002.

Decided May 6, 2002.

Theodore N.I. Tondrowski, Tondrowski *&*Wicker, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Sara E. Flannery, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Gantt, Jr., appeals the district court’s order revoking his term of supervised release. Gantt argues the Government’s evidence was insufficient to prove he violated the terms and conditions of his supervised release. We do not agree.

We review a district court’s revocation of supervised release for abuse of discretion. Un*ited States v. Davis,*53 F.3d 638, 642-43 (4th Cir.1995). The district court need only find a violation of a condition of supervised release by a preponderance of the evidence. *See*18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(e)(3) (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find the evidence sufficient to prove Gantt violated the terms and conditions of his supervised release by committing a new crime and by failing to notify his probation officer, as required, within seventy-two hours of his arrest.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order revoking Gantt’s supervised release. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR EQUIVALENT

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report of Hitachi, Ltd. on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March
31, 2005 (the Report) pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Etsuhiko Shoyama, President and Chief Executive Officer of Hitachi, Ltd., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hitachi, Ltd.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                         |  |     |  |                                                       
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Date:    August 26, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Etsuhiko Shoyama                                  
|                         |  |     |  | Name:         Etsuhiko Shoyama                        
|                         |  |     |  | Title:           President and Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 644

 644

 643

 611

 582

 566

 546

 546

 548

 544

 517

 514

 522

 613

 568

 541

 550

 582

 513

 536

 564

 546

 536

 555

 560

 569

 579

 555

 472

 581

 444

 440

 457

 465

 476

 478

 471

 487

 472

 476

 455

 476

 453

 454

 444

 438

 440

 433

 450

 445

 450

 455

 459

 448

 435

 441

 439

 442

 434

 438

 562

 575

 591

 563

 539

 530

 520

 525

 522

 508

 492

 497

 492

 509

 493

 470

 471

 483

 472

 487

 489

 484

 474

 484

 482

 487

 482

 483

 442

 500

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 363

 371

 381

 364

 349

 344

 337

 340

 339

 330

 320

 323

 320

 331

 321

 306

 307

 314

 308

 317

 318

 315

 309

 315

 314

 317

 314

 314

 289

 325

TOTAL 15,108

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20