alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation will meet on April 18-19, 2011, at the St. Regis Hotel, 923 16th Street, NW., Washington, DC, from 8:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on the maintenance and periodic readjustment of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities. The Committee is to assemble and review relevant information relating to the nature and character of disabilities arising from service in the Armed Forces, provide an ongoing assessment of the effectiveness of the rating schedule, and give advice on the most appropriate means of responding to the needs of Veterans relating to disability compensation.

The Committee will receive briefings on issues related to compensation for Veterans with service-connected disabilities and other VA benefits programs. Time will be allocated for receiving public comments in the afternoon. Public comments will be limited to three minutes each. Individuals wishing to make oral statements before the Committee will be accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. Individuals who speak are invited to submit 1-2 page summaries of their comments at the time of the meeting for inclusion in the official meeting record.

                    The public may submit written statements for the Committee's review to Dr. Corina Negrescu, Designated Federal Officer, Department of Veterans Affairs, Compensation and Pension Service, Regulation Staff (211D), 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, or e-mail at                     *Corina.Negrescu@va.gov.*                     Any member of the public wishing to attend the meeting or seeking additional information should contact Dr. Corina Negrescu at (202) 461-9752.                

Dated: March 28, 2011.

By Direction of the Secretary.

William F. Russo,

Director of Regulations Management, Office of General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2011-7588 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
### §470aaa–9. Regulations

As soon as practical after March 30, 2009, the Secretary shall issue such regulations as are appropriate to carry out this chapter, providing opportunities for public notice and comment.

(Pub. L. 111–11, title VI, §6310, Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1177.)
#### § 300.328 Alternative means of meeting participation.

When conducting IEP Team meetings and placement meetings pursuant to this subpart, and subpart E of this part, and carrying out administrative matters under section 615 of the Act (such as scheduling, exchange of witness lists, and status conferences), the parent of a child with a disability and a public agency may agree to use alternative means of meeting participation, such as video conferences and conference calls.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1414(f))
### §7643. Engagement of United States diplomatic missions

As soon as practicable but not later than 2 years after October 7, 2016, each chief of mission to a focus country should begin to implement the recommendations contained in the strategic plan required under section 7631(a)(2) of this title, among other goals, for the country.

(Pub. L. 114–231, title IV, §403, Oct. 7, 2016, 130 Stat. 955.)
#### Agostino Gnecco, Appellant, v. Incorporated Village of Great Neck Plaza et al., Respondents.

Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                       Exhibit A

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rica Foods, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Calixto Chaves,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350,
as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/ Calixto Chaves

--------------------
Calixto Chaves
Chief Executive Officer
January 13, 2003
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MICHAEL JUDE LAREDO,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00073

- CR

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 4

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20110C10680 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 14TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2015.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, J., and Barajas, C.J. (Senior Judge)

Barajas, C.J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment
### §26. Definition of seaport

As used in this title, the term "seaport" means all piers, wharves, docks, and similar structures, adjacent to any waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, to which a vessel may be secured, including areas of land, water, or land and water under and in immediate proximity to such structures, buildings on or contiguous to such structures, and the equipment and materials on such structures or in such buildings.

(Added Pub. L. 109–177, title III, §302(c), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 233.)
### §8012. Engagement of diplomatic missions of the United States

Not later than 1 year after December 20, 2019, each chief of mission (as defined in section 3902 of title 22) to a relevant country in a priority region or to a priority flag state may, if the Secretary of State determines such action is appropriate—

(1) convene a working group, led by Department of State officials, to examine IUU fishing, which may include stakeholders such as—

(A) United States officials from relevant agencies participating in the interagency Working Group identified in section 8031 of this title, foreign officials, nongovernmental organizations, the private sector, and representatives of local fishermen in the region; and

(B) experts on IUU fishing, law enforcement, criminal justice, transnational organized illegal activity, defense, intelligence, vessel movement monitoring, and international development operating in or with knowledge of the region; and

(2) designate a counter-IUU Fishing Coordinator from among existing personnel at the mission if the chief of mission determines such action is appropriate.

(Pub. L. 116–92, div. C, title XXXV, §3542, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2001.)
# Official Journal C 338/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 338 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 652 September 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 338

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 652 September 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 338/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Supplement 2022/8 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2022/C 338/02 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Supplement 2022/8 (
  1
  ) | 18 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 338/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Supplement 2022/8 (
  1
  )

1

1

2022/C 338/02

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Supplement 2022/8 (
  1
  )

1

18

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal C 182A/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.182.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 182A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5522 June 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.182.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 182A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5522 June 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 182A/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — fourth supplement to the 30th complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2012/C 182A/01

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — fourth supplement to the 30th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5103 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the floor on 

the area wage index under the inpatient prospective payment system 

to certain sole community hospitals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2019 

Mr. PETERSON (for himself and Mr. TIPTON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend 

the floor on the area wage index under the inpatient 

prospective payment system to certain sole community 

hospitals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Hospital Fron5 tier Workforce Fairness Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5103 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENDING FLOOR ON AREA WAGE INDEX TO CER2 TAIN SOLE COMMUNITY HOSPITALS. 

3 Section 1886(d)(3)(E)(iii) of the Social Security Act 

4 (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(3)(E)(iii)) is amended— 

5 (1) in subclause (I), by inserting before the pe6 riod at the end the following: ‘‘and, for discharges 

7 occurring on or after October 1, 2019, the area 

8 wage index applicable under this subparagraph to 

9 any sole community hospital that is located not more 

10 than 75 miles from the closest frontier State and 

11 that makes an election under subclause (V) may not 

12 be less than 1.00’’; and 

13 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub14 clause: 

15 ‘‘(V) SOLE COMMUNITY HOS16 PITAL ELECTION.—The Secretary 

17 shall provide for a process under 

18 which a sole community hospital de19 scribed in subclause (I) may elect, at 

20 such time and in such manner as 

21 specified by the Secretary, to apply 

22 subclause (I) to such sole community 

23 hospital.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
[No. 8284.

Department One.

February 4, 1910.]

#### Joe Schlumpf, *Appellant,*v. J. L. Kahaley, Respondent.3

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered April 22, 1909, upon findings in favor of the defendant, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to recover the value of personal property.

Affirmed.

*Hughes, McMicken, Lovell & Ramsey*and *E. O. Hanford,*for appellant.

*Richard Saxe Jones,*for respondent.

3

Reported in 106 Pac. 1135.

Per Curiam.

Action to recover the value of two cases of cigars, shipped from Tampa, Florida, to Seattle and consigned to appellant. *699The respondent is a drayman and, upon the arrival of the cigars at Seattle, he obtained the cases from the railway company for delivery to appellant. Plaintiff, claiming not to have received the cigars, brought the action, and the court below, finding delivery had been made, gave judgment in favor of defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

The only error assigned is that the evidence does not support the findings of fact. This assignment of error necessitated a careful reading of the evidence and, after having done so, we find ample testimony to sustain the findings. It would serve no good purpose, and would only add unnecessary length to this opinion, to recite the evidence here. It is sufficient to say that the court below was justified by the evidence in the record in making its findings of fact and conclusions of law, and entered the proper judgment thereon.

The judgment is sustained.
§ 645.42 What are Upward Bound stipends? ( a ) An Upward Bound project may provide stipends for all participants who participate on a full-time basis.
( b ) In order to receive the stipend, the participant must show evidence of satisfactory participation in activities of the project including— ( 1 ) Regular attendance; and
( 2 ) Performance in accordance with standards established by the grantee and described in the application.
( c ) The grantee may prorate the amount of the stipend according to the number of scheduled sessions in which the student participated.
( d ) The following rules govern the amounts of stipends a grantee is permitted to provide: ( 1 ) For Regular Upward Bound projects and Upward Bound Math and Science Centers— ( i ) For the academic year component, the stipend may not exceed $40 per month; and
( ii ) The stipend may not exceed $60 per month for the summer school recess for a period not to exceed three months, except that youth participating in a work-study position may be paid $300 per month during the summer school recess.
( 2 ) For Veterans Upward Bound projects, the stipend may not exceed $40 per month.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-11 and 1070a-13)
[60 FR 4748, Jan. 24, 1995, as amended at 75 FR 65789, Oct. 26, 2010]
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4981 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4981

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 10, 2020

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2505 Derita Avenue in Charlotte, North Carolina, as the ``Julius L. 
             Chambers Civil Rights Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JULIUS L. CHAMBERS CIVIL RIGHTS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2505 Derita Avenue in Charlotte, North Carolina, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Julius L. Chambers Civil Rights Memorial 
Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Julius L. 
Chambers Civil Rights Memorial Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 5, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
### §3586. Implementation of a sentence of imprisonment

The implementation of a sentence of imprisonment is governed by the provisions of subchapter C of chapter 229 and, if the sentence includes a term of supervised release, by the provisions of subchapter A of chapter 229.

(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §212(a)(2), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2001.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Nov. 1, 1987, and applicable only to offenses committed after the taking effect of this section, see section 235(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as a note under section 3551 of this title.
#### Margaret Murphy, Appellant, v. New York Press Company, Ltd., Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 5th day of May, 1918, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

Per Curiam:

We think the publication alleged in the complaint was libelous *per se,*and that the court should have granted the plaintiff’s motion for judgment. The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the plaintiff’s motion for judgment granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the defendant to withdraw demurrer and to answer within twenty days on payment of costs in this coxxrt and at Special Term. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scbtt, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and plaintiff’s motion for judgment granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to defendant to withdraw demurrer and to answer on payment of costs.
#### Michael Simonelli, Appellant, v. John Daddazio, Respondent.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 November 25, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-15744

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 07-60818-CV-AJ

JUDY COPELAND, 

with help of roommate Carl Shell due

to Judy Copeland's mental retardation, 

Plaintiff, 

CARL SHELL, 

Proposed Intervenor-Appellant, 

versus

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF HOLLYWOOD, 

TIM SCHWARTZ, 

Defendants-Appellees. 
________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(November 25, 2008)

Before ANDERSON, CARNES, and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Because we have decided that the district court properly granted summary

judgment on Judy Copeland’s claims underlying this challenge, see Copeland v.

Housing Authority of Hollywood, No. 08-10744 (11th Cir. Nov. __, 2008), Carl

Shell’s motion to intervene is DENIED.

2
#### Fred Clay, Appellant, v. Edgar Monington et al., Respondents.

All concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 487

 474

 438

 419

 411

 457

 404

 472

 552

 585

 555

 571

 558

 541

 497

 429

 483

 479

 499

 439

 537

 573

 579

 612

 639

 613

 573

 487

 459

 466

 511

 250

 253

 258

 271

 269

 256

 252

 259

 249

 254

 264

 271

 271

 264

 273

 286

 279

 313

 308

 307

 310

 305

 317

 326

 333

 330

 326

 322

 334

 330

 368

 329

 321

 330

 323

 325

 314

 284

 310

 334

 333

 338

 348

 345

 353

 351

 341

 358

 370

 362

 333

 364

 371

 380

 398

 404

 397

 397

 379

 377

 385

 426

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 9, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 219

 214

 220

 216

 217

 210

 192

 208

 222

 222

 225

 231

 229

 234

 233

 227

 237

 245

 240

 222

 241

 245

 251

 262

 266

 261

 261

 250

 249

 254

 279

TOTAL 10,980

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
### §5042. Revocation of probation

Any juvenile probationer shall be accorded notice and a hearing with counsel before his probation can be revoked.

(Added Pub. L. 93–415, title V, §512, Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1138; amended Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §214(c), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2014.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–473 struck out "parole or" before "probation" in section catchline and text, and struck out "parolee or" before "probationer" in text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–473 effective Nov. 1, 1987, and applicable only to offenses committed after the taking effect of such amendment, with section as in effect prior to such amendment to remain in effect for five years as and individual who committed an offense or an act of juvenile delinquency before Nov. 1, 1987, and as to a term of imprisonment during the period described in section 235(a)(1)(B) of Pub. L. 98–473, see section 235(a)(1), (b)(1)(D) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3551 of this title.

#### Repeals

Pub. L. 93–415, title V, §512, Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1138, cited as a credit to this section, was repealed by Pub. L. 115–385, title III, §307, Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5152.
### §176. Seizure, forfeiture, and destruction

(a) In General.—(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Attorney General may request the issuance, in the same manner as provided for a search warrant, of a warrant authorizing the seizure of any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system that—

(A) pertains to conduct prohibited under section 175 of this title; or

(B) is of a type or in a quantity that under the circumstances has no apparent justification for prophylactic, protective, or other peaceful purposes.

(2) In exigent circumstances, seizure and destruction of any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1) may be made upon probable cause without the necessity for a warrant.

(b) Procedure.—Property seized pursuant to subsection (a) shall be forfeited to the United States after notice to potential claimants and an opportunity for a hearing. At such hearing, the Government shall bear the burden of persuasion by a preponderance of the evidence. Except as inconsistent herewith, the same procedures and provisions of law relating to a forfeiture under the customs laws shall extend to a seizure or forfeiture under this section. The Attorney General may provide for the destruction or other appropriate disposition of any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system seized and forfeited pursuant to this section.

(c) Affirmative Defense.—It is an affirmative defense against a forfeiture under subsection (a)(1)(B) of this section that—

(1) such biological agent, toxin, or delivery system is for a prophylactic, protective, or other peaceful purpose; and

(2) such biological agent, toxin, or delivery system, is of a type and quantity reasonable for that purpose.

(Added Pub. L. 101–298, §3(a), May 22, 1990, 104 Stat. 202; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330010(16), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2144; Pub. L. 107–188, title II, §231(c)(3), June 12, 2002, 116 Stat. 661.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Subsec. (a)(1)(A). Pub. L. 107–188 substituted "pertains to" for "exists by reason of".

1994—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "the Government" for "the government".