alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3071. Information for which rewards authorized

(a) With respect to acts of terrorism primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, the Attorney General may reward any individual who furnishes information—

(1) leading to the arrest or conviction, in any country, of any individual or individuals for the commission of an act of terrorism against a United States person or United States property; or

(2) leading to the arrest or conviction, in any country, of any individual or individuals for conspiring or attempting to commit an act of terrorism against a United States person or property; or

(3) leading to the prevention, frustration, or favorable resolution of an act of terrorism against a United States person or property.

(b) With respect to acts of espionage involving or directed at the United States, the Attorney General may reward any individual who furnishes information—

(1) leading to the arrest or conviction, in any country, of any individual or individuals for commission of an act of espionage against the United States;

(2) leading to the arrest or conviction, in any country, of any individual or individuals for conspiring or attempting to commit an act of espionage against the United States; or

(3) leading to the prevention or frustration of an act of espionage against the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 98–533, title I, §101(a), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2706; amended Pub. L. 103–359, title VIII, §803(a), Oct. 14, 1994, 108 Stat. 3438.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–359 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 98–533, §1, Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2706, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter and section 2708 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse, amending sections 2669, 2678 and 2704 of Title 22, enacting provisions set out as a note under section 5928 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees and amending provisions set out as a note under section 2651 of Title 22] may be cited as the '1984 Act to Combat International Terrorism'."

#### Attorney General's Authority To Pay Rewards To Combat Terrorism

Pub. L. 107–56, title V, §501, Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 363, which provided that funds available to Attorney General could be used for payment of rewards to combat terrorism and defend Nation against terrorist acts, in accordance with procedures and regulations established or issued by Attorney General, and set forth conditions in making such rewards, was repealed by Pub. L. 107–273, div. A, title III, §301(c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1781.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 8,905

 8,894

 8,630

 8,102

 7,311

 7,361

 7,383

 8,128

 8,511

 9,296

 8,811

 8,432

 9,054

 7,919

 8,704

 7,989

 7,304

 6,353

 5,556

 8,361

 8,774

 8,908

 9,554

 9,686

 9,822

 8,812

 8,804

 8,931

 9,347

 9,291

 1,917

 1,977

 1,777

 1,685

 1,750

 2,019

 2,226

 2,433

 2,413

 2,901

 3,264

 1,863

 1,571

 1,470

 1,718

 1,680

 1,647

 1,517

 1,684

 1,836

 2,837

 2,703

 2,213

 1,977

 2,609

 1,925

 1,540

 1,411

 1,789

 2,054

 5,248

 5,135

 4,946

 4,782

 4,602

 4,447

 4,471

 4,947

 5,109

 5,762

 5,620

 4,769

 4,422

 4,413

 4,275

 3,812

 3,713

 3,231

 3,703

 5,067

 5,253

 5,160

 5,049

 5,088

 5,563

 5,432

 4,951

 4,895

 5,276

 5,745

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 20, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    
    /s/ Bert B. YoungBert B. YoungChief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    June 14, 2007
§ 336.1 Denial after section 335 examination. ( a ) After completing all examination procedures contained in part 335 of this chapter and determining to deny an application for naturalization, USCIS will serve a written notice of denial upon an applicant for naturalization no later than 120 days after the date of the applicant's first examination on the application.
( b ) A notice of denial shall be prepared in a written, narrative format, and shall recite, in clear concise language, the pertinent facts upon which the determination was based, the specific legal section or sections applicable to the finding of ineligibility, and the conclusions of law reached by the examining officer in rendering the decision. Such notice of denial shall also contain a specific statement of the applicant's right either to accept the determination of the examining officer, or request a hearing before an immigration officer.
( c ) Service of the notice of denial must be by personal service as described in 8 CFR 103.8, or upon the attorney or representative of record as provided in part 292 of this chapter.
[56 FR 50499, Oct. 7, 1991, as amended at 76 FR 53802, Aug. 29, 2011]
§ 663.3 Who is eligible to receive a fellowship under this program? An individual is eligible to receive a fellowship if the individual— ( a ) ( 1 ) Is a citizen or national of the United States; or
( 2 ) Is a permanent resident of the United States;
( b ) Is employed by an institution of higher education;
( c ) Has been engaged in teaching relevant to his or her foreign language or area studies specialization for the two years immediately preceding the date of the award;
( d ) Proposes research relevant to his or her modern foreign language or area specialization which is not dissertation research for a doctoral degree; and
( e ) Possesses sufficient foreign language skills to carry out the research project.
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6), 2454(e)(1))
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5023 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient 

clinic in Youngstown, Ohio, as the ‘‘Carl Nunziato VA Clinic’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 8, 2019 

Mr. RYAN (for himself, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. WENSTRUP, Mrs. BEATTY, Mr. 

JORDAN, Mr. LATTA, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. DAVIDSON

of Ohio, Mr. TURNER, Ms. FUDGE, Mr. BALDERSON, Mr. JOYCE of Ohio, 

Mr. STIVERS, Mr. GONZALEZ of Ohio, and Ms. KAPTUR) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs communitybased outpatient clinic in Youngstown, Ohio, as the 

‘‘Carl Nunziato VA Clinic’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 Congress makes the following findings: 

5 (1) Carl Nunziato graduated from Youngstown 

6 State University ROTC as the Distinguished Mili7 tary Graduate in 1961 and commissioned into the 

8 U.S. Army. 

2 

•HR 5023 IH

1 (2) While serving, Major (ret.) Nunziato was 

2 stationed in Thailand during the Laotian Crisis. 

3 Major Nunziato later served two voluntary tours of 

4 combat duty in Vietnam. 

5 (3) On his second tour, then-Captain Nunziato 

6 was severely injured, losing both legs from a mortar 

7 attack while protecting a small Vietnamese village in 

8 Soui Da. 

9 (4) Major Nunziato spent two years at Walter 

10 Reed Military Hospital recovering from his wounds. 

11 He then returned home to Northeastern Ohio where 

12 he enrolled in Case Western University Law School 

13 earning a degree in 1971. Following retirement from 

14 active duty, Major Nunziato continuously cham15 pioned the rights of veterans and the disabled, while 

16 establishing a distinguished career in banking and 

17 finance. 

18 (5) Due to Major Nunziato’s tireless efforts, a 

19 Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic 

20 was established in Youngstown. Additionally, his ex21 haustive work throughout Mahoning County has 

22 brought curb cuts, wheel chair ramps and other ac23 cessibility measures to county public buildings, uni24 versities and courthouses, affording more independ25 ence to local disabled population. These efforts were 

3 

•HR 5023 IH

1 borne from witnessing fellow disabled veterans de2 nied justice and equality, after having fought and 

3 sacrificed for those same principles. 

4 SEC. 2. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

5 COMMUNITY-BASED OUTPATIENT CLINIC, 

6 YOUNGSTOWN, OHIO. 

7 The Department of Veterans Affairs community8 based outpatient clinic in Youngstown, Ohio, shall, after 

9 the date of the enactment of this Act, be known and des10 ignated as the ‘‘Carl Nunziato VA Clinic’’. Any reference 

11 to such clinic in any law, regulation, map, document, 

12 record, or other paper of the United States shall be consid13 ered to be a reference to the Carl Nunziato VA Clinic. 

Æ
### **CHAPTER 17—COINS AND CURRENCY**

Sec.
331.
Mutilation, diminution, and falsification of coins.
332.
Debasement of coins; alteration of official scales, or embezzlement of metals.
333.
Mutilation of national bank obligations.
334.
Issuance of Federal Reserve or national bank notes.
335.
Circulation of obligations of expired corporations.
336.
Issuance of circulating obligations of less than $1.
337.
Coins as security for loans.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1965**—Pub. L. 89–81, title II, §212(b), July 23, 1965, 79 Stat. 257, added item 337.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Frederick R. Kotteman, Appellant, v. Rhinelander Waldo, as Police Commissioner of the City of *940New York, Respondent.

Determination confirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. Mo opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Oarr and Rich, JJ., concurred.
#### Daniel MARTINEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Roy A. CASTRO, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 01-55550. D.C. No. CV 00-0880 GAF (E).

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 2, 2002.

Decided May 8, 2002.

Before PREGERSON, TROTT, Circuit Judges, and FITZGERALD,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable James M. Fitzgerald, Senior District Judge for the District of Alaska sitting by designation.

ORDER **

Petitioner Daniel Martinez appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. In a report and recommendation, a U.S. Magistrate Judge thoroughly analyzed Petitioner’s claims. The district court adopted the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation and dismissed the petition.

On appeal, Petitioner does not present any basis upon which the district court’s judgment could be overturned. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation as adopted by the district court.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by the Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
j 

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

Qwest Government Services, Inc. 

d/b/a CenturyLink QGS 

Under Contract No. HC1013-12-D-0002 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60263 

Thomas 0. Mason, Esq. 

Francis E. Purcell, Jr., Esq. 

Erin M. Estevez, Esq. 

Cooley LLP 

Washington, DC 

William E. Brazis, Jr., Esq. 

DISA General Counsel 

Laura R. Barke, Esq. 

Colleen M. Eagan, Esq. 

Trial Attorneys 

Defense Information Systems Agency 

Scott Air Force Base, IL 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Pursuant to the request in appellant's "MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE," dated 28 July 2016, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

Dated: 3 August 2016 

J.REIROUTY 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60263, Appeal of Qwest Government Services, Inc. 

d/b/a/ CenturyLink QGS, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
§ 222.143 What terms and conditions apply to the transfer of minimum school facilities? When the Secretary transfers to an LEA or other appropriate entity (transferee) facilities that have been used to carry out the purposes of section 10 of Pub. L. 81-815 or section 8008, the Secretary establishes appropriate terms and conditions for the transfer including that it be— ( a ) Without charge; and
( b ) Consented to by the transferee.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7708)
### §1519. Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy

Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

(Added Pub. L. 107–204, title VIII, §802(a), July 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 800.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 4,206

 5,685

 6,009

 7,349

 7,176

 6,584

 6,856

 6,050

 5,855

 6,158

 4,860

 4,154

 3,985

 4,428

 4,478

 5,493

 5,309

 5,559

 5,384

 5,072

 4,352

 3,983

 3,199

 3,125

 3,445

 2,832

 2,869

 3,207

 3,585

 3,674

 6,750

 404

 230

 206

 271

 285

 316

 434

 285

 371

 369

 470

 500

 655

 1,074

 907

 502

 360

 359

 429

 466

 474

 351

 355

 404

 529

 472

 504

 661

 627

 433

 240

 1,470

 1,687

 2,062

 3,040

 3,083

 2,906

 2,830

 2,375

 2,213

 2,474

 2,403

 2,239

 2,294

 2,339

 2,218

 2,305

 2,152

 2,469

 2,536

 2,503

 2,325

 1,931

 1,764

 1,737

 1,845

 1,686

 1,591

 1,742

 1,747

 1,595

 2,034

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 11, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### In Re BABCOCK’S ESTATE.

(263 N. W. 158.)

(File Nos. 7796-7.

Opinion filed November 18, 1935.)

*2
      *Louck & Wohlheter,*of Watertown, for Appellant.

*Walter Stover,*of Watertown, and *George W. Prichard,*of Onawa, Iowa, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the determination of the controversy, as made by the circuit court, was an order as distinguished from a judgment. The action of the circuit court was the result of a trial de novo in circuit court on an appeal from the county court on questions of 'both law and fact. This court in the case of Ryan v. Lundberg, 60 S. D. 74, 243 N. W. 102, said: “When an appeal to the circuit court from the action of the county court is. on questions of both law and fact, the trial is ‘de novo/ and the statute contemplates that the trial court will pronounce judgment.”

We are of the opinion that the above-cited case controls our decision in this case, and it follows that the time limit in which to appeal from a judgment controls.

The appeal will not be dismissed.

All the Judges concur.
H. R. 4981 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2505 Derita 

Avenue in Charlotte, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Julius L. Chambers Civil Rights 

Memorial Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JULIUS L. CHAMBERS CIVIL RIGHTS MEMORIAL POST 

OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 2505 Derita Avenue in Charlotte, North Carolina, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Julius L. Chambers Civil 

Rights Memorial Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Julius L. Chambers Civil Rights Memorial Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### Joseph H. S. Muller v. George F. Snyder.

Motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 11,570

 12,706

 13,871

 14,070

 13,101

 13,235

 12,623

 11,388

 10,774

 12,100

 11,062

 10,565

 10,861

 12,452

 14,297

 13,830

 15,496

 16,106

 14,595

 13,051

 12,473

 11,775

 11,956

 11,824

 11,320

 11,886

 12,006

 11,138

 10,323

 7,490

 6,112

 4,615

 4,196

 4,516

 4,526

 4,890

 4,016

 3,337

 3,159

 3,873

 3,747

 4,408

 4,562

 4,512

 4,869

 4,869

 5,005

 3,831

 4,410

 6,712

 5,822

 3,771

 4,705

 3,924

 5,110

 5,077

 5,680

 6,475

 5,277

 5,008

 4,277

 3,186

 7,325

 7,614

 8,305

 9,158

 8,028

 8,419

 7,547

 7,239

 7,638

 7,932

 7,896

 7,665

 7,200

 7,782

 8,720

 8,505

 8,628

 10,002

 10,239

 9,353

 8,328

 7,768

 7,791

 8,313

 7,783

 8,037

 9,039

 8,056

 6,752

 5,763

 4,581

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 4, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation of our report dated January 11, 1996,
appearing the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ASHA Corporation for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 1996, in the following Registration Statements on
Form S-8:

     SEC File No.              Name of Plan             Date of Filing
     ------------              ------------             --------------
      33-81688       Consulting Agreement Shares        July 18, 1996
      33-93678       1994 Stock Option Plan             June 20, 1995


/s/ McDirmid, Mikkelsen & Secrest, P.S.
McDirmid, Mikkelsen & Secrest, P.C.

January 10, 1997
§ 606.8 What is a comprehensive development plan and what must it contain? ( a ) A comprehensive development plan is an institution's strategy for achieving growth and self-sufficiency by strengthening its— ( 1 ) Academic programs;
( 2 ) Institutional management; and
( 3 ) Fiscal stability.
( b ) The comprehensive development plan must include the following: ( 1 ) An analysis of the strengths, weaknesses, and significant problems of the institution's academic programs, institutional management, and fiscal stability.
( 2 ) A delineation of the institution's goals for its academic programs, institutional management, and fiscal stability, based on the outcomes of the analysis described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( 3 ) Measurable objectives related to reaching each goal and timeframes for achieving the objectives.
( 4 ) Methods and resources that will be used to institutionalize practices and improvements developed under the proposed project.
( 5 ) Its five year plan to improve its services to Hispanic and other low-income students.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1101 *et seq.*)
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7590]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Notice of Intent To License Government-Owned Inventions; Intent 
To License Exclusively

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The inventions listed below are assigned to the United States 
Government as represented by the Secretary of the Army. The U.S. Army 
Edgewood Chemical Biological Center intends to license these inventions 
exclusively in the field of virus detection in Agricultural and 
Veterinary Diagnostics and Agricultural and Veterinary Disease 
Detection, to NanoEngineering Corporation, a Florida Corporation with 
principal offices at 1717 Edgar Street--Unit 103, and West Palm Beach, 
Florida 33401-6976. The inventions to be licensed are U.S. Patent No. 
6,051,189 issued April 18, 2000, and entitled ``System and method for 
detection, identification and monitoring of submicron-sized 
particles,'' U.S. Patent No. 6,485,686 issued November 26, 2002, and 
entitled ``Method and apparatus for counting submicron sized 
particles,'' U.S. Patent No. 6,491,872 issued December 10, 2002, and 
entitled ``Method and system for detecting and recording submicron 
sized particles,'' and U.S. Patent No. 7,250,138 issued July 31, 2007, 
and entitled ``Method and system for detecting and recording submicron 
sized particles.''

ADDRESSES: Requests for more information and/or objections should be 
directed to Eric McGill telephone: 410-436-8467, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bedbccd7dd90cd90d3ddd9d7d2d2fecbcd90dfccd3c790d3d7d2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5633243f357825783b35313f3a3a1623257837243b2f783b3f3a">[email protected]</span></a>, U.S. Army Edgewood Chemical Biological 
Center (ECBC), AMSRD-ECB-PI-BP-TT, Bldg E3330/Rm 241 5183 Blackhawk 
Road, APG, MD 21010-5424. Any requests of objections should be made 
within 15 days of the publication of this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dhirajlal Parekh, Office of Research 
and Technology Applications, U.S. Army Edgewood Chemical Biological 
Center, AMSRD-ECB-PI-BP-TT, Bldg E3330/Rm 241 5183 Blackhawk Road, APG, 
MD 21010-5424, telephone: 410-436-8400, e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4024282932212a2c212c6e302132252b280035336e21322d396e2d292c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8eeae6e7fcefe4e2efe2a0feeffcebe5e6cefbfda0effce3f7a0e3e7e2">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-7590 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 5b.3 Policy.

It is the policy of the Department to protect the privacy of individuals to the fullest extent possible while nonetheless permitting the exchange of records required to fulfill the administrative and program responsibilities of the Department, and responsibilities of the Department for disclosing records which the general public is entitled to have under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, and part 5 of this title.
#### § 300.706 [Reserved]