alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 489

 480

 470

 508

 501

 489

 472

 467

 452

 453

 441

 470

 491

 500

 479

 448

 431

 430

 400

 363

 338

 326

 342

 328

 317

 730

 726

 728

 706

 676

 401

 408

 412

 407

 413

 393

 386

 375

 410

 385

 379

 354

 335

 396

 363

 364

 335

 322

 270

 270

 252

 268

 243

 233

 252

 253

 665

 634

 649

 608

 443

 436

 442

 448

 445

 442

 432

 428

 434

 423

 409

 406

 423

 440

 417

 405

 380

 362

 337

 323

 303

 300

 315

 296

 293

 479

 691

 681

 670

 654

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 15, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 290

 285

 289

 293

 291

 289

 283

 281

 284

 277

 269

 267

 277

 288

 274

 266

 251

 240

 224

 216

 203

 201

 211

 199

 197

 312

 443

 437

 430

 420

TOTAL 12,957

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
#### § 395.38 Reports.

At the end of each fiscal year, each property managing department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States shall report to the Secretary the total number of applications for vending facility locations received from State licensing agencies, the number accepted, the number denied, the number still pending, the total amount of vending machine income collected and the amount of such vending machine income disbursed to the State licensing agency in each State.
§ 303.301 Public awareness program—information for parents. ( a ) *Preparation and dissemination.* In accordance with § 303.116, each system must include a public awareness program that requires the lead agency to— ( 1 ) ( i ) Prepare information on the availability of early intervention services under this part, and other services, as described in paragraph (b) of this section; and
( ii ) Disseminate to all primary referral sources (especially hospitals and physicians) the information to be given to parents of infants and toddlers, especially parents with premature infants or infants with other physical risk factors associated with learning or developmental complications; and
( 2 ) Adopt procedures for assisting the primary referral sources described in § 303.303(c) in disseminating the information described in paragraph (b) of this section to parents of infants and toddlers with disabilities.
( b ) *Information to be provided.* The information required to be prepared and disseminated under paragraph (a) of this section must include— ( 1 ) A description of the availability of early intervention services under this part;
( 2 ) A description of the child find system and how to refer a child under the age of three for an evaluation or early intervention services; and
( 3 ) A central directory, as described in § 303.117.
( c ) *Information specific to toddlers with disabilities.* Each public awareness program also must include a requirement that the lead agency provide for informing parents of toddlers with disabilities of the availability of services under section 619 of the Act not fewer than 90 days prior to the toddler's third birthday.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1435(a)(6), 1437(a)(9))
#### § 222.24 How does a local educational agency that has multiple tax rates for real property classifications derive a single real property tax rate?

An LEA that has multiple tax rates for real property classifications derives a single tax rate for the purposes of determining its Section 7002 maximum payment by dividing the total revenues for current expenditures it received from local real property taxes by the total taxable value of real property located within the boundaries of the LEA. These data are from the fiscal year prior to the fiscal year in which the applicant seeks assistance.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7702)

[81 FR 64741, Sept. 20, 2016]
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean TDS

1 650 648 649 417

2 648 638 645 415

3 647 628 640 412

4 636 606 623 401

5 633 609 623 401

6 636 602 620 399

7 633 624 627 403

8 625 620 622 400

9 625 615 624 402

10 627 626 626 403

11 631 627 628 404

12 634 631 632 407

13 638 630 636 409

14 648 629 639 411

15 637 627 633 407

16 643 637 641 412

17 642 614 626 403

18 638 616 626 403

19 619 616 617 397

20 619 615 617 397

21 618 615 617 397

22 617 611 614 395

23 612 599 606 391

24 603 589 595 384

25 597 589 594 383

26 595 567 586 378

27 575 535 555 359

28 547 511 529 343

29 539 503 523 339

30 534 526 527 342

31 538 521 528 342

Total 18868

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Check 20 

Period: May 2023 Run Date: 6/12/2023
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 406

 408

 390

 391

 406

 430

 435

 439

 417

 388

 392

 393

 378

 395

 398

 421

 423

 473

 449

 417

 392

 381

 369

 386

 377

 400

 398

 398

 388

 377

 297

 293

 290

 290

 287

 284

 284

 286

 282

 281

 291

 293

 290

 281

 275

 270

 264

 267

 265

 266

 274

 270

 263

 271

 268

 288

 282

 275

 276

 276

 337

 334

 328

 326

 324

 332

 332

 342

 331

 333

 323

 325

 328

 327

 321

 325

 324

 324

 325

 325

 310

 310

 311

 319

 312

 335

 333

 333

 321

 327

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 3, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 224

 222

 219

 217

 216

 221

 221

 227

 221

 222

 216

 217

 219

 218

 214

 217

 216

 216

 217

 217

 208

 208

 208

 213

 209

 223

 222

 222

 214

 218

TOTAL 9,777

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 556

 561

 563

 560

 554

 535

 537

 542

 515

 510

 491

 506

 519

 524

 528

 522

 525

 539

 538

 562

 579

 562

 604

 613

 601

 609

 611

 626

 585

 624

 471

 433

 418

 402

 427

 445

 450

 460

 439

 410

 370

 394

 428

 462

 483

 495

 507

 520

 526

 530

 533

 532

 543

 542

 555

 568

 570

 561

 532

 532

 516

 502

 499

 496

 506

 504

 492

 512

 487

 465

 416

 455

 475

 491

 504

 511

 515

 530

 531

 548

 556

 540

 574

 569

 571

 586

 592

 598

 564

 592

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 10, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 335

 326

 324

 323

 329

 327

 320

 332

 317

 303

 273

 297

 310

 319

 327

 332

 334

 344

 344

 355

 360

 350

 371

 368

 369

 378

 382

 386

 365

 382

TOTAL 15,697

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
### §1656. Conversion or surrender of vessel

Whoever, being a captain or other officer or mariner of a vessel upon the high seas or on any other waters within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States, piratically or feloniously runs away with such vessel, or with any goods or merchandise thereof, to the value of $50 or over; or

Whoever yields up such vessel voluntarily to any pirate—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 774; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §497 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §306, 35 Stat. 1148).

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $10,000" in last par.
#### Duncan Victor Ayemere IDOKOGI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General; J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Maryland Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-6298.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2002.

Decided May 23, 2002.

*959Duncan Victor Ayemere Idokogi, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Duncan Victor Ayemere Idokogi appeals the district court’s order transferring his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appeal-able interlocutory or collateral order. *See Technosteel, L.L.C. v. Beers Constr. Co.,*271 F.3d 151, 153-54 & n. 2 (4th Cir.2001).

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4952 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4952

   To direct the Secretary of Transportation to issue regulations to 
revise title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, to require an air carrier 
   to permit eligible service animals to accompany eligible veterans 
                 during travel, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 31, 2019

  Ms. Cheney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Secretary of Transportation to issue regulations to 
revise title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, to require an air carrier 
   to permit eligible service animals to accompany eligible veterans 
                 during travel, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Strengthening Support For Veterans 
with Service Animals Act''.

SEC. 2. RULEMAKING FOR VETERANS TRAVELING WITH SERVICE DOGS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Transportation shall issue such 
regulations as are necessary to revise section 382.117 of title 49, 
Code of Federal Regulations, to require an air carrier to permit an 
eligible service animal to accompany an eligible veteran during travel 
if such veteran provides--
            (1) the documentation described in subsection (e) of such 
        section 382.117 (as in effect on the date of enactment of this 
        Act); or
            (2) a valid veterans identification card issued by the 
        Department of Veterans Affairs that contains a service-
        connected disability designation.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Eligible veteran.--The term ``eligible veteran'' means 
        a veteran with a service-connected disability (as such terms 
        are defined in section 101 of title 38, United States Code).
            (2) Eligible service animal.--The term ``eligible service 
        animal'' means a dog certified to serve as a service animal 
        with credentials from an entity approved by the Secretary.
                                 <all>
```
### §1960. Prohibition of unlicensed money transmitting businesses

(a) Whoever knowingly conducts, controls, manages, supervises, directs, or owns all or part of an unlicensed money transmitting business, shall be fined in accordance with this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.

(b) As used in this section—

(1) the term "unlicensed money transmitting business" means a money transmitting business which affects interstate or foreign commerce in any manner or degree and—

(A) is operated without an appropriate money transmitting license in a State where such operation is punishable as a misdemeanor or a felony under State law, whether or not the defendant knew that the operation was required to be licensed or that the operation was so punishable;

(B) fails to comply with the money transmitting business registration requirements under section 5330 of title 31, United States Code, or regulations prescribed under such section; or

(C) otherwise involves the transportation or transmission of funds that are known to the defendant to have been derived from a criminal offense or are intended to be used to promote or support unlawful activity;

(2) the term "money transmitting" includes transferring funds on behalf of the public by any and all means including but not limited to transfers within this country or to locations abroad by wire, check, draft, facsimile, or courier; and

(3) the term "State" means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Northern Mariana Islands, and any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 102–550, title XV, §1512(a), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4057; amended Pub. L. 103–325, title IV, §408(c), Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2252; Pub. L. 107–56, title III, §373(a), Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 339; Pub. L. 109–162, title XI, §1171(a)(2), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3123.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Subsec. (b)(1)(C). Pub. L. 109–162 substituted "to be used" for "to be used to be used".

2001—Pub. L. 107–56 amended section catchline and text generally, substituting provisions relating to prohibition of unlicensed money transmitting businesses for similar provisions relating to prohibition of illegal money transmitting businesses.

1994—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 103–325 amended par. (1) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (1) read as follows:

"(1) the term 'illegal money transmitting business' means a money transmitting business that affects interstate or foreign commerce in any manner or degree and which is knowingly operated in a State—

"(A) without the appropriate money transmitting State license; and

"(B) where such operation is punishable as a misdemeanor or a felony under State law;".
Case 19-34574-KRH    Doc 110    Filed 09/25/19    Entered 09/25/19 17:51:12    Desc Main Document      Page 1 of 3

Case 19-34574-KRH    Doc 110    Filed 09/25/19    Entered 09/25/19 17:51:12    Desc Main Document      Page 2 of 3

Case 19-34574-KRH    Doc 110    Filed 09/25/19    Entered 09/25/19 17:51:12    Desc Main Document      Page 3 of 3
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6759** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. GERALD FELTON , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Distr ict of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. ( 5:93

- cr - 00123

- F

- 1 )

Submitted : October 18, 2011 Decided: November 9, 2011

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Gerald Felton, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gerald Felton appeals the district court ’ s order denying his motion under Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Felton , No. 5:93

- cr - 00123

- F

- 1 (E.D.N.C. May 23, 2011)
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### James Nagle, as President of Local Union 12058, District No. 50, United Mine Workers of America, Respondent, v. Steve McMullen et al., Appellants.

Present — Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCum, JJ.
### §156. Knowing disregard of bankruptcy law or rule

(a) Definitions.—In this section—

(1) the term "bankruptcy petition preparer" means a person, other than the debtor's attorney or an employee of such an attorney, who prepares for compensation a document for filing; and

(2) the term "document for filing" means a petition or any other document prepared for filing by a debtor in a United States bankruptcy court or a United States district court in connection with a case under title 11.

(b) Offense.—If a bankruptcy case or related proceeding is dismissed because of a knowing attempt by a bankruptcy petition preparer in any manner to disregard the requirements of title 11, United States Code, or the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the bankruptcy petition preparer shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both.

(Added Pub. L. 103–394, title III, §312(a)(1)(B), Oct. 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 4140; amended Pub. L. 109–8, title XII, §1220, Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 195.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, referred to in subsec. (b), are set out in the Appendix to Title 11, Bankruptcy.

#### Amendments

2005—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–8, in first par., inserted "(1) the term" before " 'bankruptcy petition preparer' " and substituted "; and" for period at end and, in second par., inserted "(2) the term" before " 'document for filing' " and substituted "title 11" for "this title".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2005 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 109–8 effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under Title 11, Bankruptcy, before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as a note under section 101 of Title 11.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 22, 1994, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under Title 11, Bankruptcy, before Oct. 22, 1994, see section 702 of Pub. L. 103–394, set out as an Effective Date of 1994 Amendment note under section 101 of Title 11.
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS N O . P D - 1716- 09

R A Y M O N D W A I ER W I R TH , A ppe l l ant

v . THE S TA TE OF TE X AS O N T H E S T A T E ’ S P E T I T I O N F O R D I S C R E T I O N A R Y R E V I E W

FROM THE S I XT H CO URT O F AP PEALS

FANNI N CO UNTY J OHNS ON , J. , de l i ve r e d t he opi ni on o f t he C our t i n w hi c h K ELL ER , P .J ., P RI CE , W O M ACK , K EASLE R , H ERVEY , H OL C OM B , and C OCHR AN , J J ., jo in e d . M E YE RS , J ., di s s e nt e d. O P I N I O N Appellant wa s indicted for the offe nse of thef t of p ro p erty

over $200,000 pur suant to one scheme and continuing c o urse of conduct. T EX . P EN A L C ODE § 31.03 (a) . A jury convicted appellant of

the lesser

offe nse of thef

t o f $ 2 0 ,000 or more but less than $100,000, a ssessed a punis hme nt o f t e n ye ars ’ i mpriso nment and a $1 0, 00 0 f

ine , a nd re c omm e nd e d c omm

un ity supervision. W

irt h v . S tate , 296 S.W .3d 89 5 , 897 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2009). The trial court sentenc ed appe llant to ten year s’ incarcer ation, pro b at edfor f ive year s, fined him $10,000, and2

order ed him to pay

restitution of $128,103.27. In th e c ourt

of a pp e a ls, a pp e lla nt a rgue d th at the evi den ce wa s le g a lly and fa c tua lly ins uf fi c ie nt t o s up po rt

theve rd ic t be c a

us e th e evi den ce c ou ld n ot s up po rt a fi nd ingof

int e nt t o commit theft. The cour

t of appe als held that the evidence was factually insufficient to support the verdic t, pursuant to Clewis v. State, 922 S.W .2d 126 (Tex
. C ri m. App. 1996). W irt h v . S tate , 296 S.W .3d 895 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2009)(de livered Septe mber 28, 2009). At thetim e tha

t th e c ourt

of a pp e a ls c on sid e re d th is c a se , th is C ourt ha d n ot i ss ue d it s opinion in Broo k

s v . S tate , ___ S.W .3d ___, 2010 Tex. Crim . App. L EXI S 1240 ( Tex. Crim . App. No. PD-0210-09, de livered O ctober 6, 2010), in which we overr uled Cle wis
. We t

he re fo reva c ate the judgment of the c ourt of appea ls a nd rema nd the ca se to that court f

or re consideration pursuant to Brooks
.
Deliver ed: Dec ember

15, 2010 Pub lis h
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6759

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

GERALD FELTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (5:93-cr-00123-F-1)

Submitted: October 18, 2011 Decided: November 9, 2011

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gerald Felton, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Gerald Felton appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion under Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Felton, No. 5:93-cr-00123-F-1 (E.D.N.C. May 23, 2011). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### J. Hermon McLear, as Director and Officer of McLear Mines, Inc., Respondent, v. Clara McLear et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Opinion by Hill, P. J. Bliss, Heffernan and Schenck, JJ., concur; Crapser, J. *703dissents, and votes to affirm the orders appealed from upon the ground that there are so many misstatements and cross-statements in the papers that a trial should be had and an opportunity to cross-examine should be given.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN, INC

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Annual Report
of California Pizza Kitchen, Inc (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Larry S. Flax, Co-Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

March 13, 2009



By:

/s/    LARRY S.
FLAXLarry S. Flax Co-Chief Executive Officer








|* | This certificate accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### §831p. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 648

Section, act May 18, 1933, ch. 32, §17, 48 Stat. 67, authorized construction of the Cove Creek Dam across Clinch River.