### Instructions for filling in the Emission Test Template

This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 separate runs or sampling events for each of the requested constituents. This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. yellow are required. All cells that are shaded in green are populated using drop

- down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls (example: 8100_Unit_2_EmisTestMethods.xls).

Please refer to the following steps when using these spreadsheets.

Boiler Information Worksheet

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet. 2. Please enter the control device configuration.

Emission Data Worksheets

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg Hg +2

### , or if the Ontario

- Hydro Method was used, you would need to enter Hg 0

### , HgP, and Hg Volatile Organic HAP and Speciated Semi

-Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions follow for these worksheets:

Boiler Operation Information

1. Please provide the values of all requested parameters for each of test run/sample. 2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

Fuel Information

1. Please enter what types of fuel are being used in your boiler using the drop

- downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of zero. 2. Please enter the unit of measure using the drop down provided. 3. Please enter the test method used to determine the fuel input rate. 4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

Emission Data

### 1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and ppmvd @ 7% O 2 

### (parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please also enter these data.

### This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fuel burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. You must complete at least 3 separate This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. Fields shaded in down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. Please name each resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet.

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg0 

### and , HgP, and Hg+2 

### . However, both the Speciated Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop

- down provided in the Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions

2. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You may enter up to 4 fuel types. If you are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples,

4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

### 1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each run in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and

(parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please alsoEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

963 Dallm an 34Control Device Configuraton

Listed (by

boiler) in the Configuration Order Section of the Facility Unit Configurations Section of the Electronic ICRListed (by boiler) in the Configuration Order Section of the Facility Unit Configurations Section of the Electronic ICREIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

963 Dallm an 34

1 6/30/2010 13:27 6/30/2010 2 7/1/2010 10:37 7/1/2010 3 7/1/2010 12:12 7/1/2010



## CWLP is submitting the ICR data using this excel spreadsheet due to the fact that we continued to receive error messages w hen trying to populate the data into the ERT database. All the required ICR emissions data is included in this spreadsheet (Acid Gas HAPs and Non-Mercury Metallic HAPs). Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used

14:38 <0.24 U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 033 (CTM-033) 12:50 <0.25 U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 033 (CTM-033) 13:25 <0.24 U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 033 (CTM-033)



## CWLP is submitting the ICR data using this excel spreadsheet due to the fact that we continued to receive error messages w hen trying to populate the data into the ERT database. All the required ICR emissions data is included in this spreadsheet (Acid Gas HAPs and Non-Mercury Metallic HAPs). Hydrogen Cyanide Emission Test Results Test End TimeData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments BDL <0.000245 1730 15.2 12 BDL <0.000256 1724 15.3 11.7 BDL <0.000233 1723 15.3 11.2 Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate 6.8 390588 129.4 1443.5 bitum inous ton/day Other 7 384963 129.9 1465 bitum inous ton/day Other 7.6 386823 129.8 1465 bitum inous ton/day Other Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas O 2(%)Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Dallm an Unit 34 was only able to achieve ~ 70% of full load. This was discussed with Bill Maxwell on 6/9/2010. Dallm an Unit 34 was only able to achieve ~ 70% of full load. This was discussed with Bill Maxwell on 6/9/2010. Dallm an Unit 34 was only able to achieve ~ 70% of full load. This was discussed with Bill Maxwell on 6/9/2010. Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationDallm an Unit 34 was only able to achieve ~ 70% of full load. This was discussed with Bill Maxwell on 6/9/2010. Dallm an Unit 34 was only able to achieve ~ 70% of full load. This was discussed with Bill Maxwell on 6/9/2010. Dallm an Unit 34 was only able to achieve ~ 70% of full load. This was discussed with Bill Maxwell on 6/9/2010.EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

963 Dallm an 34

1 6/30/2010 12:10 6/30/2010 2 7/1/2010 7:55 7/1/2010 3 7/1/2010 11:15 7/1/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used

15:25 [<0.05] 11:02 0.1 14:25 0.08 Test End Time Hydrogen Chloride Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments BDL [<0.000065] 1730 15.1 12 DDL 0.000136 1724 15.4 11.7 DDL 0.0001 1723 14.9 11.2 Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%) Hydrogen Chloride Emission Test Results Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate 6.8 399610 129.3 1443.5 bitum inous ton/day Other 7 391001 130.1 1465 bitum inous ton/day Other 7.6 384158 128.9 1465 bitum inous ton/day Other Flue Gas Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm)Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Method 26A

Method 26A Method 26A Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

963 Dallm an 34

1 6/30/2010 12:10 6/30/2010 2 7/1/2010 7:55 7/1/2010 3 7/1/2010 11:15 7/1/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used

15:25 [<0.09] 11:02 0.1 14:25 0.09 Hydrogen Flouride Emission Test Results Test End TimeData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments BDL [<0.000065] 1730 15.1 DDL 0.000076 1724 15.4 DDL 0.00006 1723 14.9 Hydrogen Flouride Emission Test Results Steam Output (1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Flue Gas Moisture (%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method 12 6.8 399610 129.3 1443.5 bitum inous ton/day Other 11.7 7 391001 130.1 1465 bitum inous ton/day Other 11.2 7.6 384158 128.9 1465 bitum inous ton/day Other

Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1 Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%)Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Method 26A

Method 26A Method 26A Fuel #4 Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

963 Dallm an 34

1 6/29/2010 8:15 6/29/2010 2 6/29/2010 12:55 6/29/2010 3 6/30/2010 7:50 6/30/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppb) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used

12:30 [<0.081] 17:15 [<0.081] 12:10 [<0.079] Test End Time An timony (Sb) Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments BDL [<0.000000351] 1703 15.6 BDL [<0.000000370] 1717 15.7 BDL [<0.000000360] 1721 15.4 Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Steam Output

(1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method 12.3 6.3 383635 130.2 1478 bitum inous ton/day Other 12 6.8 383563 129.9 1478 bitum inous ton/day Other 12 6.8 384645 129.1 1444 bitum inous ton/day Other Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Method 5/29

Method 5/29 Method 5/29 Other Supporting Information Fuel #4EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

963 Dallm an 34

1 6/29/2010 8:15 6/29/2010 2 6/29/2010 12:55 6/29/2010 3 6/30/2010 7:50 6/30/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used

12:30 [<0.131] 17:15 [<0.132] 12:10 [<0.129] Test End Time Arsenic (A s) Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments BDL [<0.000000351] 1703 15.6 BDL [<0.000000371] 1717 15.7 BDL [<0.000000364] 1721 15.4 Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Steam Output

(1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method 12.3 6.3 383635 130.2 1478 bitum inous ton/day Other 12 6.8 383563 129.9 1478 bitum inous ton/day Other 12 6.8 384645 129.1 1444 bitum inous ton/day Other Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Method 5/29

Method 5/29 Method 5/29 Other Supporting Information Fuel #4EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

963 Dallm an 34

1 6/29/2010 8:15 6/29/2010 2 6/29/2010 12:55 6/29/2010 3 6/30/2010 7:50 6/30/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppb) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used

12:30 [<0.272] 17:15 [<0.273] 12:10 [<0.268] Test End Time Beryllium (Be) Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments BDL [<0.0000000877] 1703 15.6 BDL [<0.0000000926] 1717 15.7 BDL [<0.0000000909] 1721 15.4 Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Steam Output

(1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method 12.3 6.3 383635 130.2 1478 bitum inous ton/day Other 12 6.8 383563 129.9 1478 bitum inous ton/day Other 12 6.8 384645 129.1 1444 bitum inous ton/day Other Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Method 5/29

Method 5/29 Method 5/29 Other Supporting Information Fuel #4EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

963 Dallm an 34

1 6/29/2010 8:15 6/29/2010 2 6/29/2010 12:55 6/29/2010 3 6/30/2010 7:50 6/30/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppb) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used

12:30 [<0.022] 17:15 [<0.022] 12:10 [<0.033] Test End Time Cadmium (Cd) Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments BDL [<0.0000000877] 1703 15.6 BDL [<0.0000000926] 1717 15.7 BDL [<0.000000141] 1721 15.4 Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Steam Output

(1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method 12.3 6.3 383635 130.2 1478 bitum inous ton/day Other 12 6.8 383563 129.9 1478 bitum inous ton/day Other 12 6.8 384645 129.1 1444 bitum inous ton/day Other Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Method 5/29

Method 5/29 Method 5/29 Other Supporting Information Fuel #4EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

963 Dallm an 34

1 6/29/2010 8:15 6/29/2010 2 6/29/2010 12:55 6/29/2010 3 6/30/2010 7:50 6/30/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppb) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used

12:30 1.61 17:15 1.512 12:10 0.794 Test End Time Chromium (Cr) Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments DDL 0.00000299 1703 15.6 DDL 0.00000296 1717 15.7 DDL 0.00000155 1721 15.4 Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Steam Output

(1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method 12.3 6.3 383635 130.2 1478 bitum inous ton/day Other 12 6.8 383563 129.9 1478 bitum inous ton/day Other 12 6.8 384645 129.1 1444 bitum inous ton/day Other Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Method 5/29

Method 5/29 Method 5/29 Other Supporting Information Fuel #4EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

963 Dallm an 34

1 6/29/2010 8:15 6/29/2010 2 6/29/2010 12:55 6/29/2010 3 6/30/2010 7:50 6/30/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppb) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used

12:30 [<0.008] 17:15 [<0.008] 12:10 [<0.008] Test End Time Cobalt (Co) Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments BDL [<0.0000000877] 1703 15.6 BDL [<0.0000000926] 1717 15.7 BDL [<0.0000000909] 1721 15.4 Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Steam Output

(1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method 12.3 6.3 383635 130.2 1478 bitum inous ton/day Other 12 6.8 383563 129.9 1478 bitum inous ton/day Other 12 6.8 384645 129.1 1444 bitum inous ton/day Other Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Method 5/29

Method 5/29 Method 5/29 Other Supporting Information Fuel #4EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

963 Dallm an 34

1 6/29/2010 8:15 6/29/2010 2 6/29/2010 12:55 6/29/2010 3 6/30/2010 7:50 6/30/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppb) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used

12:30 0.038 17:15 0.031 12:10 [<0.021] Test End Time Lead (Pb) Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments DDL 0.000000281 1703 15.6 DDL 0.000000245 1717 15.7 BDL [<0.000000164] 1721 15.4 Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Steam Output

(1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method 12.3 6.3 383635 130.2 1478 bitum inous ton/day Other 12 6.8 383563 129.9 1478 bitum inous ton/day Other 12 6.8 384645 129.1 1444 bitum inous ton/day Other Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Method 5/29

Method 5/29 Method 5/29 Other Supporting Information Fuel #4EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

963 Dallm an 34

1 6/29/2010 8:15 6/29/2010 2 6/29/2010 12:55 6/29/2010 3 6/30/2010 7:50 6/30/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppb) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used

12:30 0.61 17:15 0.423 12:10 [<0.422] Test End Time Ma nganese (Mn) Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments DDL 0.0000012 1703 15.6 DDL 0.000000873 1717 15.7 BDL [<0.000000873] 1721 15.4 Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Steam Output

(1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method 12.3 6.3 383635 130.2 1478 bitum inous ton/day Other 12 6.8 383563 129.9 1478 bitum inous ton/day Other 12 6.8 384645 129.1 1444 bitum inous ton/day Other Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Method 5/29

Method 5/29 Method 5/29 Other Supporting Information Fuel #4EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

963 Dallm an 34

1 6/29/2010 8:15 6/29/2010 2 6/29/2010 12:55 6/29/2010 3 6/30/2010 7:50 6/30/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppb) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used

12:30 1.058 17:15 0.661 12:10 0.658 Test End Time Nickel (Ni) Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments DDL 0.00000222 1703 15.6 DDL 0.00000146 1717 15.7 DDL 0.00000145 1721 15.4 Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Steam Output

(1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method 12.3 6.3 383635 130.2 1478 bitum inous ton/day Other 12 6.8 383563 129.9 1478 bitum inous ton/day Other 12 6.8 384645 129.1 1444 bitum inous ton/day Other Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Method 5/29

Method 5/29 Method 5/29 Other Supporting Information Fuel #4EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

963 Dallm an 34

1 6/29/2010 8:15 6/29/2010 2 6/29/2010 12:55 6/29/2010 3 6/30/2010 7:50 6/30/2010 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start Time Test End DateMe asured Value (ppb) Basis (Wet or Dry) Test Method Used

12:30 [<0.691] 17:15 [<0.472] 12:10 [<0.388]

0.000691 Test End Time Selenium (Se) Emission Test ResultsData Flag (ADL,

BDL, DDL) Test Method

Comments BDL [<0.00000195] 1703 15.6 BDL [<0.00000140] 1717 15.7 BDL [<0.00000115] 1721 15.4 Calculated Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) Steam Output

(1000 lb/hr) Total Heat

Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%)Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Measurement

Method 12.3 6.3 383635 130.2 1478 bitum inous ton/day Other 12 6.8 383563 129.9 1478 bitum inous ton/day Other 12 6.8 384645 129.1 1444 bitum inous ton/day Other Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F) Fuel #1Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel #2 Fuel #3Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Method 5/29

Method 5/29 Method 5/29 Other Supporting Information Fuel #4EIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 963 Dallm an 34

2 6/29/2010 11:10 3 6/29/2010 13:25 4 6/30/2010 7:50 Run Number Test Start Date Test Start TimePlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Measured Value (μg/dscm) Basis (Wet or Dry)

6/29/2010 13:10 0.83 Dry 6/29/2010 15:25 0.61 Dry 6/30/2010 9:50 0.5 Dry Test End Date Test End Time Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test ResultsPlease note QA/QC documentation starting in Column "AI"

Test Method Used Data Flag (ADL, BDL, DLL) Test Method

Comments (lb/mmBtu)

U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL 7.20E-07 U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL 5.48E-07 U.S. EPA Method 30B ADL 4.49E-07 Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Test Results Steam Output (1000 lb/hr)Fuel Input Rate

15.6 12.3 6.3 383635 130.2 15.7 12 6.8 383568 129.9 15.6 12 6.8 384645 129.1 Total Heat Input (mmBtu/hr) Flue Gas

Moisture (%) Flue Gas CO 2(%) Flue Gas

O 2(%) Flue Gas

Flow Rate (dscfm) Flue Gas

Temperature (F)Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of

Measure Measurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel #1 Fuel #2Fuel Type Units of Me asure Me asurement

Method Fuel Input

Rate Fuel Type Units of Measure Me asurement

Method Fuel #3 Fuel #4QA /QC Documentation

Trap ID Section 1

Mass (ng) Section 2

Mass (ng) Total

Mass (ng) Initial

Spike (ng) Total NonSpike (ng) Other Supporting InformationSample

Volume (dscm) Volume

Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Breaktrough

(%) Breaktrough

Limit Concentration

(μg/dscm) Trap ID

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Trap #1

≤20% of field

recovery test ≤10% of Section 1 Hg

mass for Hg conc. >1

μg/dscm: or ≤ 20% of SectionSection 1

Mass Section 2

Mass Total

Mass Initial

Spike Total NonSpike Sample

Volume Volume

Difference (%) Volume Diff. Limit Trap #2

≤20% of field

recovery testBreaktrough (%) Breaktrough Limit Concentration

(μg/dscm) Abs. diff. RD (%) Limit C rec

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Paired Trap Agreement (RD) Me asured Spike Recovery ( R )

≤10% of Section 1 Hg mass for Hg conc. >1

μg/dscm: or ≤ 20% of Section 1 for Hg conc. ≤1 ≥ 10 % RD mass for Hg conc. >1 μg/dscm: or

≤20% RD or ≤ 0.2 μg/dscm abs.diff. for Hg conc. ≤1R (%) by

Run Ravg(%) Limit

#DIV/0! Average

Recovery

, between 85 and 115% Me asured Spike Recovery ( R )