alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 303.403 Definitions. The following definitions apply to §§ 303.402 through 303.417 in addition to the definition of personally identifiable information in § 303.29 and disclosure in 34 CFR 99.3: ( a ) *Destruction* means physical destruction of the record or ensuring that personal identifiers are removed from a record so that the record is no longer personally identifiable under § 303.29.
( b ) *Early intervention records* mean all records regarding a child that are required to be collected, maintained, or used under part C of the Act and the regulations in this part.
( c ) *Participating agency* means any individual, agency, entity, or institution that collects, maintains, or uses personally identifiable information to implement the requirements in part C of the Act and the regulations in this part with respect to a particular child. A participating agency includes the lead agency and EIS providers and any individual or entity that provides any part C services (including service coordination, evaluations and assessments, and other part C services), but does not include primary referral sources, or public agencies (such as the State Medicaid or CHIP program) or private entities (such as private insurance companies) that act solely as funding sources for part C services.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3, 1417(c), 1435(a)(5), 1439(a)(2), 1442)
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date:      February 19, 2009 |   | By:  |  /s/      BOBBY TESNEY                                 |
|------------------------------------|--------|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               |   |      | Bobby      TesneyPresident      and Chief Executive Officer |
|  Date:      February 19, 2009 |   | By:  |   /s/      MICHAEL R. MURPHY                      |
|                               |   |      | Michael      R. MurphyChief      Financial Officer          |

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 307

 328

 362

 352

 290

 262

 251

 285

 290

 272

 282

 286

 269

 280

 295

 314

 332

 336

 361

 350

 347

 362

 341

 336

 351

 369

 353

 332

 350

 348

 398

 177

 182

 185

 185

 183

 191

 171

 177

 198

 196

 204

 193

 197

 203

 186

 184

 187

 194

 192

 193

 204

 201

 199

 207

 205

 204

 204

 207

 207

 202

 207

 242

 245

 258

 258

 236

 227

 217

 231

 250

 242

 249

 245

 235

 234

 233

 234

 235

 242

 251

 243

 264

 266

 263

 265

 270

 265

 264

 253

 255

 253

 260

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:August 2, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 166

 167

 175

 175

 162

 156

 150

 159

 171

 166

 170

 167

 161

 161

 160

 161

 161

 166

 171

 166

 179

 180

 179

 180

 183

 180

 179

 172

 174

 172

 177

TOTAL 7,685

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 14,954

 15,559

 15,608

 15,477

 17,215

 16,618

 16,494

 16,238

 17,622

 16,986

 17,268

 18,219

 18,186

 18,506

 16,764

 16,553

 16,826

 15,909

 16,914

 16,691

 15,388

 16,547

 16,446

 18,146

 18,556

 18,160

 18,295

 16,177

 15,235

 15,832

 14,984

 6,175

 6,340

 6,899

 7,281

 8,463

 8,604

 10,120

 10,471

 10,144

 10,342

 9,491

 8,684

 7,854

 9,556

 8,391

 7,856

 6,385

 6,893

 8,667

 9,886

 8,870

 9,006

 8,383

 8,570

 9,245

 9,389

 8,298

 7,842

 7,145

 6,637

 7,224

 10,766

 10,590

 10,592

 11,160

 12,106

 12,556

 13,027

 13,307

 13,625

 13,228

 12,847

 12,598

 12,618

 14,069

 13,331

 12,353

 11,800

 12,068

 13,073

 13,163

 12,088

 12,260

 12,164

 12,365

 13,324

 12,875

 12,070

 11,359

 10,627

 10,653

 10,924

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 3, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Richmond Division 

In re Case No.

 Chapter 13

 

 Debtor(s). 

ORDER CONDITIONALLY APPROVING LOAN MODIFICATION AGREEMENT

A hearing was held in open court on __________________________ on debtor’s motion 

to approve loan modification agreement. Upon consideration of the motion, it is 

ORDERED: 

1. The debtor’s motion to approve the loan modification agreement is 

CONDITIONALLY APPROVED. 

2. A final hearing on debtor’s motion to approve the loan modification agreement 

will be heard on __________________________, at _________ _____, at the U.S. Bankruptcy 

Court, _______________________________________________________________________.

This final hearing may be canceled if, prior to the final hearing, the parties submit to the Court:

(1) a fully executed copy of the loan modification agreement; and (2) a proposed final order on

the motion with endorsements by the debtor or debtor’s counsel if the debtor has been 

represented by counsel during the motion proceedings, the Chapter 13 trustee, and the creditor or 

creditor’s counsel if the creditor has been represented by counsel during the motion proceedings. 

Date: _____________________ ______________________________ 

 Judge 

 NOTICE OF JUDGMENT ORDER

 ENTERED ON DOCKET

 _________________________

Michelle Delores Hawkins 17-31327-KRH

September 26, 2018

November 20, 2018 12:00 P.M.

Judge Huennekens' Courtroom, 701 East Broad St., Room 5000, Richmond, VA 23219

Sep 28 2018 /s/ Kevin R Huennekens

Oct 1 2018

Case 17-31327-KRH Doc 37 Filed 10/01/18 Entered 10/01/18 12:10:26 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
### §403. Notice of copyright: Publications incorporating United States Government works

Sections 401(d) and 402(d) shall not apply to a work published in copies or phonorecords consisting predominantly of one or more works of the United States Government unless the notice of copyright appearing on the published copies or phonorecords to which a defendant in the copyright infringement suit had access includes a statement identifying, either affirmatively or negatively, those portions of the copies or phonorecords embodying any work or works protected under this title.

(Pub. L. 94–553, title I, §101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2577; Pub. L. 100–568, §7(c), Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2858.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### house report no. 94–1476

Section 403 is aimed at a publishing practice that, while technically justified under the present law, has been the object of considerable criticism. In cases where a Government work is published or republished commercially, it has frequently been the practice to add some "new matter" in the form of an introduction, editing, illustrations, etc., and to include a general copyright notice in the name of the commercial publisher. This in no way suggests to the public that the bulk of the work is uncopyrightable and therefore free for use.

To make the notice meaningful rather than misleading, section 403 requires that, when the copies or phonorecords consist "preponderantly of one or more works of the United States Government," the copyright notice (if any) identify those parts of the work in which copyright is claimed. A failure to meet this requirement would be treated as an omission of the notice, subject to the provisions of section 405.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–568 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "Whenever a work is published in copies or phonorecords consisting preponderantly of one or more works of the United States Government, the notice of copyright provided by sections 401 or 402 shall also include a statement identifying, either affirmatively or negatively, those portions of the copies or phonorecords embodying any work or works protected under this title."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–568 effective Mar. 1, 1989, with any cause of action arising under this title before such date being governed by provisions in effect when cause of action arose, see section 13 of Pub. L. 100–568, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
Counsel for the Debtor

Brett Alexander Zwerdling, VBN 39569 

Zwerdling, Oppleman, Adams & Gayle 

5020 Monument Avenue 

Richmond, VA 23230 

Ph 804-355-5719 Fx 804-355-1597 

bzwerdling@zandolaw.com 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Richmond Division 

In re: Colleen Beth Higgins 

 

 Debtor. 

)

) 

) 

)

Case No.: 16-30731-KLP

Chapter 13 

REPLY TO MOTION TO DISMISS OR CONVERT CASE BY LAURIE PEARCE 

 Comes now your Debtor, by counsel, who hereby denies all of the allegations contained 

in Laurie Pearce’s Motion to Dismiss Case. Your Debtor believes the purpose of this Motion, 

among other pleadings filed, is to harass and/or cause unnecessary delay in the conclusion of this 

case. Debtor further asserts that there is no need or reason to convert the case to one under 

Chapter 7 as the Plan payments have been completed and the case is ready for discharge. 

 WHEREFORE, your Debtor prays that the Motion be DENIED and prays for an award of 

attorneys fees and/or sanctions pursuant to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 9011. 

 

 /s/ Brett Alexander Zwerdling

 Counsel 

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on March 4, 2021 a true copy of this Response was served by 

CM/ECF or mailed to the following parties: 

Office of the U.S. Trustee 

701 E. Broad St, Room 4304 

Richmond, VA 23219 

Suzanne E. Wade, 13 Trustee 

P.O. Box 1780 

Richmond, VA 23218 

Laurie Pearce 

2311 Thousand Oaks Drive 

Henrico, VA 23294 

and also by email to Laurie Pearce at 

lp23294us@yahoo.com 

/s/ Brett Alexander Zwerdling

Case 16-30731-KLP Doc 177 Filed 03/04/21 Entered 03/04/21 11:13:31 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5053 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2020 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To exempt juveniles from the requirements for suits by 

prisoners, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5053 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Justice for Juveniles 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF JUVENILES FROM THE REQUIRE5 MENTS FOR SUITS BY PRISONERS. 

6 Section 7 of the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Per7 sons Act (42 U.S.C. 1997e) is amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (h), by striking ‘‘sentenced 

9 for, or adjudicated delinquent for,’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘or sentenced for’’; and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(i) EXEMPTION OF JUVENILE PRISONERS.—This 

13 section shall not apply to an action pending on the date 

14 of enactment of the Justice for Juveniles Act or filed on 

15 or after such date if such action is— 

16 ‘‘(1) brought by a prisoner who has not at17 tained 22 years of age; or 

18 ‘‘(2) brought by any prisoner with respect to a 

19 prison condition that occurred before the prisoner 

20 attained 22 years of age.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
### A ^ 

# P i 

# F . S i RIVAT Er

LIGH T t^ERVICE S LLC ^ 607 9 C.R . 425 , Hannibal , M O 6340 1 Ph.573-221-323 0 fa

x 573-221-513 3 www.barronaviation.com mbaiTon(a),

c las s icaircraft.com Septembe r

26 , 201 1 Docke t Managemen t Facilit y U.S . Departmen t o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E Wes t Buildin g Groun d Floo r Roo m W12-14 0 Washington , D

C 2059 0 x r • ^

"jr v••-- .

T o Who mIt

Ma y Concer n Barro n Aviatio n Privat e Fligh t Services , L.L.C . hereb y petition s for exemptio nfromPar 120 o f Titl e 14 , Cod e o f

Federa l Regulation s (14CFR ) t o allo w Barro nAviatio nPrivat e Fligh t Service s t o cove r

it s safet y sensitiv e employee s unde r on e dru g an dalcoho l testin g program . Barro n Aviatio n Privat e Fligh t Service s operate s unde r

FA R13 5 (Cert . #3BVA117M ) o n demand , an dhold s aPart 9 1 LO A BPFJCE0 3 for sightseein g operations . Du e t o th e smal l nimibe r o f employee s (6 ) an dth e fac t that al l o f the mserv e inboth capacities , ther e woul db e n o reductio no f safety involved . Th e publi c woul db e benefite db y reductio no f redundan t

administrativ e burde na s a whole . Similar exemption s hav e bee n issue dfor smal l companie s suc ha s ours , wher e man y type s o f function s ar e combine ddu e t o smal l markets . Respectfull y submitted , 

# (tlcbC^^W ^ Robi n Carrol l Barro n Aviatio n Privat e Fligh t Services , L.L.C . 607 9 Count yRoa d 42 5 Hannibal , M O 6340 1 Ph : 573-221-323 0 (ext . 300 ) Fax : 573-221-513 3 robinlarae@gmail.co m
Jefferson 

County 

Lewis & Clark U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

County Bureau of Land Management 

Malta
 

Field Office
 

Missoula 

Field Office 

Lewistown Butte Field Office Field Office
 

Miles City Helena
 

Butte Field Office
 Draft RMP/EIS

Field

Office
 Billings 

Field Office 

Dillon
 Map 45: Oil & Gas Leasing 

Field Office
 Restrictions Under Alternative D 

Broadwater 

Miles County 0 400 

Townsend 

Anaconda 

Deer Lodge 

Butte County 

Silver Bow
 

County
 

Gallatin 

County 

Livingston Bozeman 

City
 Interstate
 US Route
 MT Route
 Park Standard Lease Terms County Controlled Surface Use;Timing Limitation
 No Surface Occupancy No Lease County Boundary Field Office Boundary 

Miles 

0 40 

Map shows oil and gas leasing stipulations on federal mineral Map Scale 1:510,000 estate lands under Alternative D. 

Map generated by the Butte Field Office in February 2007 

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection 

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data for individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.
### §373. Solicitation to commit a crime of violence

(a) Whoever, with intent that another person engage in conduct constituting a felony that has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against property or against the person of another in violation of the laws of the United States, and under circumstances strongly corroborative of that intent, solicits, commands, induces, or otherwise endeavors to persuade such other person to engage in such conduct, shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half of the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the crime solicited, or both; or if the crime solicited is punishable by life imprisonment or death, shall be imprisoned for not more than twenty years.

(b) It is an affirmative defense to a prosecution under this section that, under circumstances manifesting a voluntary and complete renunciation of his criminal intent, the defendant prevented the commission of the crime solicited. A renunciation is not "voluntary and complete" if it is motivated in whole or in part by a decision to postpone the commission of the crime until another time or to substitute another victim or another but similar objective. If the defendant raises the affirmative defense at trial, the defendant has the burden of proving the defense by a preponderance of the evidence.

(c) It is not a defense to a prosecution under this section that the person solicited could not be convicted of the crime because he lacked the state of mind required for its commission, because he was incompetent or irresponsible, or because he is immune from prosecution or is not subject to prosecution.

(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §1003(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2138; amended Pub. L. 99–646, §26, Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3597; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(2)(A), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–322 inserted "(notwithstanding section 3571)" before "fined not more than one-half".

1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–646 substituted "property or against the person of another" for "the person or property of another" and inserted "life imprisonment or" before "death".
Summary: Coercion and Sexual Abuse by a U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service Official in Oregon 

Report Date: February 4, 2020 Report Number: 18-0977 

The OIG investigated an allegation that Eric Rickerson, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) 

State Supervisor, Lacey, WA, sexually assaulted an FWS employee while the two were at an 

FWS conference. The assaulted employee said that she, Rickerson, and a another male FWS 

employee shared a cabin with two bedrooms and a loft at the resort. The employee alleged that 

Rickerson came to her loft bedroom uninvited, exposed himself, and touched her inappropriately. 

We found that Rickerson entered the employee’s loft bedroom uninvited four times during the 

night, exposed himself to her multiple times, climbed into her bed naked, and touched her in a 

sexual manner more than once without her permission. 

We referred our findings to the Deschutes County District Attorney and on October 29, 2019, 

Rickerson pleaded guilty to felony coercion and misdemeanor sex abuse, harassment, 

intimidation, and private indecency. Rickerson was sentenced to 30 days in jail and 36 months 

supervised probation. He also must register as a sex offender and pay the employee $5,856.07 in 

restitution. 

The FWS suspended Rickerson without pay during the investigation and he resigned from his 

position with the FWS on November 5, 2019. This is a summary of the report we provided to the 

FWS Director.
#### Paragon Utilities Corporation, Respondent, v. Apartment Investing Corporation, Appellant.

*740Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.
Order entered March 8, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00898
- CR
MICHAEL EDWARD HARSS EMA, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 199 th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199
- 80837
- 2018



### O RDER
Th is appeal is REINSTATED

. Before the Court are appellant’s January 25, 2019 motion to unseal a portion of the record, January 30, 2019 second motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief, and February 28, 2019 supplement to the second motion for extension of time to file appellant’s
brief. By order entered January 31, 2019, the Court abated this appeal so the trial court could conduct a hearing and make findings of fact on the merits of appellant’s motion to unseal a portion of the record. T he Court’s order further directed the court reporter to file a copy of the disputed sealed record with this Court as part of the appellate record.– 2

–

On March 5, 2019, the Court received a supplemental reporter’s record of the hearing the trial court held regarding the sealed portion of the record. D uring the hearing, the trial court determined that the parties should have access to the sealed record , and it provided th em with copies of the sealed record for use solely in connection with this appeal. On March 6, 2019, the court reporter filed the sealed record as a supplemental reporter’s record in this case. In light of the trial court’s findings and actions taken dur ing the hearing, we VACATE that portion of the January 31, 2019 order requiring the trial court to prepare written findings and recommendations.
We GRANT appellant’s January 25, 2019 motion to unseal a portion of the record to the
extent we will allow the parties in their briefs and any oral argument to quote from, refer to, and advance appellate arguments regarding , the sealed record.
We GRANT IN PART appellant’s January 30, 2019 second motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief and February 2 8, 2019 supplemental motion to the extent we ORDER appellant’s brief filed within THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
### Page 1 of 3 Disposition Comments Docket No: 

### FAA - 201 1 - 0 3 26 SNPRM Directorate ID: 

### 201 1 - CE - 0 0 6 - AD Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### NO COMMENTS RECEIVED

– If this box is checked, no s ignatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. ISSUE 1: Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If YES, we agree because Make the fol lowing changes to the AD: If PARTIALLY AGREE , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If NO , we don’t agree because ISSUE 2 : Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If PARTIALLY AGREE , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD: If NO , we don’t agree because

### Page 2 of 3

For additional issues, double - click here

### Page 3 of 3 S ignature Section Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.:
ASE Date

Branch Manager Date