alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                  [REI - EXHIBIT 10(d)(d)]




                        HOUSTON INDUSTRIES ENERGY, INC.
                 LONG-TERM PROJECT INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

                   (As Established Effective January 1, 1994)


                                Fourth Amendment


         Houston Industries Incorporated, a Texas corporation, having
established the Houston Industries Energy, Inc. Long-Term Project Incentive
Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 1994 (the "Plan"), and having reserved
the right under Article XIV thereof to amend the Plan, does hereby amend the
second sentence of Article IX.B of the Plan, effective January 1, 1997, to read
as follows:

         "Long-Term Awards (including any Long-Term Awards previously awarded
         under the Plan) will be paid as soon as practicable following the
         completion of three years from the first day of the Plan Year to which
         they relate, upon the Compensation Committee's determination that the
         Performance Goals previously established with respect to such Award
         have been satisfied and subject to the remaining provisions of this
         Article IX."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Houston Industries Incorporated has caused these
presents to be executed by its duly authorized officers in a number of copies,
all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument, which may be
sufficiently evidenced by any executed copy hereof, this 26th day of February,
1998, but effective as of the date herein stated. 

                                   HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED



                                   By:   /s/ Lee W. Hogan
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                        Name:  Lee W. Hogan
                                             ----------------------------------
                                        Title: Executive Vice President
                                              ---------------------------------


ATTEST:

     /s/ Richard B. Dauphin
---------------------------------


                                      -1-
# L_2013250EN.01S00301.xml

| 20.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 250/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 250/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
### §1429. Penalties for neglect or refusal to answer subpena

Any person who has been subpenaed under the provisions of subsection (d) of section 336 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to appear at the final hearing of an application for naturalization, and who shall neglect or refuse to so appear and to testify, if in the power of such person to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(Added June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title IV, §402(b), 66 Stat. 276; amended Pub. L. 97–116, §18(u)(1), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1621; Pub. L. 101–649, title IV, §407(c)(21), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 5041; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Subsection (d) of section 336 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, referred to in text, is classified to section 1447(d) of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality.

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000".

1990—Pub. L. 101–649 substituted "an application" for "a petition".

1981—Pub. L. 97–116 substituted "subsection (d)" for "subsection (e)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1990 Amendment; Savings Provisions

Amendment by Pub. L. 101–649 effective Nov. 29, 1990, with general savings provisions, see section 408(a)(3) and (d) of Pub. L. 101–649, set out as a note under section 1421 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality.

#### Effective Date of 1981 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–116 effective Dec. 29, 1981, see section 21(a) of Pub. L. 97–116, set out as a note under section 1101 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality.
(No. 74-CC-89

#### J. F. Carney, M.D., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Corrections, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 13, 1973.*

J. F. Carney, M.D., Claimant, pro se.

*120William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
# Official Journal C 146A/4 Ma

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 146A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 634 May 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 146A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 634 May 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Ombudsman |
| 2020/C 146 A/01 | Notice of vacancy OMB/04/2020 — Director of Inquiries | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Ombudsman

2020/C 146 A/01

Notice of vacancy OMB/04/2020 — Director of Inquiries

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal C 64A/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.064.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 64A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 565 March 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.064.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 64A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 565 March 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 064A/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — second supplement to the 31st complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 064A/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — second supplement to the 31st complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio Terrell JONES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-6249.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 25, 2002.

Decided May 8, 2002.

Antonio Terrell Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Robert E. Trono, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Antonio Terrell Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certifícate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *United States v. Jones,*No. CR-00-297 (E.D.Va. Jan. 16, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
* 

S TAT E O F N E VA DA jim Gibbons, Governor 

Department of Conservation & Natural Resources Allen Biaggi, Director 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DlVlSlON OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Leo M. Drozdoff; PE., Administrator 

protecting the future for generations 

December 4,2009 

Laura Yoshii 

Acting Regional Administrator 

OAR- 1, USEPA Region IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94 105 

Dear Ms. Yoshii: 

On behalf of Governor Gibbons, as his appointed designee, this letter transmits to you two hard 

copies and one compact disc of Washoe County's portion of Nevada's PM2 5 infrastructure state 

implementation plan (SIP). Additionally, the infrastructure SIP may be viewed on Washoe 

County's website at http://ww.co.washoe.nv.us/healthlaqm/hone.html. This SIP addresses the 

2006 24-hour PM2 j national ambient air quality standards. The Nevada Division of 

Environmental Protection requests that EPA Region IX approve Washoe County's PM2 5 

infi-astructure SIP into the Nevada State Implementation Plan. 

The infrastructure SIP is being submitted pursuant to sections 1 1 O(a)(l ) and (2) of the Clean Air 

Act as amended in 1990 and was prepared in accordance with EPA guidance dated September 

29,2003. The following documents are included: 

Attachment tZ - Current CAA 1 1 O(a)(2)(A)-(M) Requirements in the Washoe County 

Portion of the Nevada PM2 5 SIP 

Attachment R - Washoe County Regulations Supporting CAA 1 1 O(a)(2)(A)-(M) 

Requirements 

Attachment C - Delegation of Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program 

Agreement 

Attachrnerlr D - Inter-Local Agreement Supporting CA.4 1 I O(a)( ,)(A)-(M) Requirements 

If you should have any questions about this submittal or require additional clarificataon, you may 

contact Andrew Goodrich or Daniel Inouye of the Washoe County District Health Department at 

775-784-7200. 

dr Administrator 

Enclosures 

90 1 S. Stewart Street, Suite 400 1 Carson City, Nevada 8970 1 p: 775.687.4670 f: 775.687.5856 www.ndep.nv.gov %&% 

pr~nted on recycled paper 

--- A - 
.. . Page 2 

Laura Yoshii, Acting Regional Administrator, USEPA R-IX 

December 3, 2009 

cc (W/O enclosures): 

Robin Reedy, Chief of Staff, Office of the Governor 

Allen Biaggi, Director, DCNR 

Greg Remer, Chief, Bureau of Air Quality Planning, NDEP 

Andrew Goodrich, Director, Air Quality Management Division, Washoe County DHD 

Daniel Inouye, Air Quality Management Division, Washoe County DHD 

Lisa Hanf, AIR-2, Chief, Planning Office, Air Division, EPA Region IX 

Certified Mail No. 7008 1140 0004 403 1 2539
#### § 300.807 Allocations to States.

The Secretary allocates the amount made available to carry out section 619 of the Act for a fiscal year among the States in accordance with §§ 300.808 through 300.810.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1419(c)(1))
(No. 76-CC-2836

#### Granite City Trust And Savings Bank, Administratrix of the Estate of Ralph W. Skaggs, Jr., Deceased, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed February 13, 1979.*

This cause is before the Court on the motion of Respondent to dismiss. The Claimant herein is the administrator of a deceased individual who was treated prior to his death by the Jewish Hospital of St. Louis. It appears that an application for payment for appropriate medical expenses was made to the Illinois Department of Public Aid on behalf of the deceased, and, following approval, some items were paid to the Jewish Hospital. Thereafter a dispute arose with respect to the remaining items.

It further appears that on November 17, 1977, a letter was written by the Illinois Department of Public Aid acknowledging the Department’s obligation to the Jewish Hospital to complete payment for services rendered to the deceased.

Respondent contends that Claimant does not have a cause of action for services rendered to the deceased, since the Illinois Department of Public Aid has acknowledged liability to the Jewish Hospital. Respondent relies upon Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 23, Paras. 11-13, which provides in pertinent part as follows:

> “A cause of action does not accrue within the meaning of this paragraph for as long as there is an unrevoked acknowledgement in writing by a government unit or the Illinois Department that it accepts the liability, in whole or in part, for a vendor claim submitted to it...”

Respondent has established that there is an unrevoked acknowledgement by the Illinois Department of *649Public Aid that it accepts liability for the claim of the Jewish Hospital. The Claimant therefore does not have a cause of action for those medical expenses.

It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is dismissed.
failed to afford him an opportunity to pursue discovery and because the 

motion to dismiss failed to comply with NRCP 12(b)(5) and NRCP 56(e). 2 

Having considered appellant's appeal statement and the 

record on appeal, we conclude that the district court properly dismissed 

appellant's complaint pursuant to NRCP 12(b)(5) for failure to state a 

claim. See Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of N. Las Vegas, 124 Nev. 224, 227-28, 

181 P.3d 670, 672 (2008) (providing that this court reviews a district court 

order dismissing a case under NRCP 12(b)(5) rigorously, accepting all 

factual allegations as true and reviewing legal conclusions de novo); see 

also Stalk v. Mushkin, 125 Nev. 21, 28 n.2, 199 P.3d 838, 843 n.2 (2009) 

(recognizing that the Nevada Rules of Professional Conduct do not provide 

an individual with a private right of action); Morgano v. Smith, 110 Nev. 

1025, 1029, 879 P.2d 735, 737 (1994) (explaining that in order to overcome 

a motion to dismiss a legal malpractice action, "the plaintiff must plead 

that he or she has obtained appellate or post-conviction relief'). Because 

dismissal was appropriate based on the complaint, without reference to 

any additional evidence, the district court did not err in dismissing the 

complaint without ordering discovery and without treating the motion as 

an NRCP 56 motion for summary judgment. See NRCP 12(b) (explaining 

that it is appropriate to treat a motion to dismiss pursuant to NRCP 

2To the extent that appellant also contends that the district court's 

decision violated the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, those rules are not 

applicable in this state court action. Compare NRCP 1 (explaining that 

the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure "govern the procedure in the district 

courts in all suits of a civil nature"), with FRCP 1 (providing that the 

Federal Rules of Civil procedure "govern the procedure in all civil actions 

and proceedings in the United States district courts"). 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 
J. 

.64.x 

Parraguirre 

12(b)(5) as a motion for summary judgment if "matters outside the 

pleading are presented to and not excluded by the court"). 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 3 

Hardesty 

cc: Hon. Timothy C. Williams, District Judge 

Anthony D. Bailey 

Bellon & Maningo, Ltd. 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

3In our October 18, 2012, order granting rehearing, we determined 

that no action was necessary with regard to appellant's notice of possible 

confession of error. Thus, we further conclude that no action is necessary 

as to appellant's November 13, 2012, letter seeking a status update as to 

the notice of possible confession of error. 

3
### §1327. Penalty for false representation

Whoever knowingly makes a false representation materially affecting the rights obtainable under this chapter for the purpose of obtaining registration of a design under this chapter shall pay a penalty of not less than $500 and not more than $1,000, and any rights or privileges that individual may have in the design under this chapter shall be forfeited.

(Added Pub. L. 105–304, title V, §502, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2915.)
No. 12,102.

#### McAlpine *v.*McAlpine.

Decided June 3, 1929.

Mr. Charles E. Friend, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Emmett Thurmon, for defendant in error.

*In Department.*

Mr. Justice Butler

delivered the opinion of the court.

Sarah K. MeAlpine sued her former daughter-in-law, Alma M. MeAlpine, to recover several articles of jewelry. The case was tried to the court without a jury. The findings and judgment were for the defendant.

1. The evidence was conflicting. There was evidence sufficient to support the findings and judgment; hence, even if we disagreed with the trial court in the *136conclusions reached — and we do not — we could not set aside the finding's and judgment and substitute our own.

2. Complaint is made that the court placed the burden of proof upon the plaintiff instead of upon the defendant. The burden was placed where it belongs. The defendant’s claim that the jewelry was given by the plaintiff to her son, and by the son to the defendant as a wedding present, is not an affirmative defense, but negatives the plaintiff’s claim that she owned the jewelry at the time the suit was brought.

3. It is unnecessary to discuss the several assignments based upon the admission of evidence. It is sufficient to say that they are without merit.

The case was fairly tried. The judgment is right. It should be, and it is, affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Whiteord, Mr. Justice Moore and Mr. Justice Burke concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 245

 340

 365

 431

 538

 540

 466

 386

 368

 804

 814

 979

 1,015

 956

 860

 1,007

 2,353

 2,649

 3,570

 4,555

 5,311

 6,325

 7,245

 7,374

 6,155

 4,666

 3,713

 3,420

 3,631

 3,706

 3,402

 125

 130

 126

 125

 125

 124

 125

 124

 126

 130

 133

 135

 144

 145

 155

 159

 183

 196

 195

 233

 285

 363

 494

 665

 617

 597

 641

 764

 773

 919

 679

 165

 170

 182

 194

 216

 232

 227

 214

 234

 340

 411

 465

 467

 453

 416

 363

 526

 829

 1,182

 1,630

 2,042

 2,484

 2,915

 3,452

 3,129

 2,596

 2,339

 2,108

 2,136

 2,014

 1,870

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 1, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5003 

To amend the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to provide enhanced protection against debt collector harassment of members of the Armed Forces, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 8, 2019 

Ms. DEAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act to provide 

enhanced protection against debt collector harassment 

of members of the Armed Forces, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Debt Collection 

5 Practices for Servicemembers Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5003 IH

1 SEC. 2. ENHANCED PROTECTION AGAINST DEBT COL2 LECTOR HARASSMENT OF MEMBERS OF THE 

3 ARMED FORCES. 

4 (a) COMMUNICATION IN CONNECTION WITH DEBT

5 COLLECTION.—Section 805 of the Fair Debt Collection 

6 Practices Act (15 U.S.C. 1692c) is amended by adding 

7 at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(e) COMMUNICATIONS CONCERNING SERVICEMEM9 BER DEBTS.— 

10 ‘‘(1) DEFINITION.—In this subsection, the term 

11 ‘covered member’— 

12 ‘‘(A) has the meaning given the term in 

13 section 987(i)(1) of title 10, United States 

14 Code; and 

15 ‘‘(B) means an individual who was sepa16 rated, discharged, or released from duty de17 scribed in such section 987(i)(1), but only dur18 ing the 365-day period beginning on the date of 

19 separation, discharge, or release. 

20 ‘‘(2) PROHIBITIONS.—A debt collector may not, 

21 in connection with the collection of any debt of a 

22 covered member— 

23 ‘‘(A) communicate with any individual 

24 above a covered member in the chain of com25 mand, including for the purpose of acquiring lo26 cation information about the covered member; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5003 IH

1 ‘‘(B) threaten to have the covered member 

2 reduced in rank; or 

3 ‘‘(C) threaten to have the covered mem4 ber’s security clearance revoked.’’. 

5 (b) UNFAIR PRACTICES.—Section 808 of the Fair 

6 Debt Collection Practices Act (15 U.S.C. 1692f) is amend7 ed by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(9) The representation to any covered member 

9 (as defined under section 805(e)(1)) that failure to 

10 cooperate with a debt collector will result in— 

11 ‘‘(A) a reduction in rank of the covered 

12 member; 

13 ‘‘(B) a revocation of the covered member’s 

14 security clearance; or 

15 ‘‘(C) prosecution under chapter 47 of title 

16 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of 

17 Military Justice).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

# AGENCY:

Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces a change in benefit period eligibility under the EB program for Michigan.

The following changes have occurred since the publication of the last notice regarding the State's EB status:
      - Based on data released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics on March 10, 2011, Michigan no longer meets the 110% criteria to remain “on” in the EB program. As a result, the payable period for Michigan in the EB program will conclude April 2, 2011.

                        The trigger notice covering state eligibility for the EB program can be found at:                         *http://ows.doleta.gov/​unemploy/​claims_​arch.asp.*

## Information for Claimants

The duration of benefits payable in the EB program, and the terms and conditions on which they are payable, are governed by the Federal-State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970, as amended, and the operating instructions issued to the states by the U.S. Department of Labor. In the case of a state beginning an EB period, the State Workforce Agency will furnish a written notice of potential entitlement to each individual who has exhausted all rights to regular benefits and is potentially eligible for EB (20 CFR 615.13(c)(1)).

Persons who believe they may be entitled to EB, or who wish to inquire about their rights under the program, should contact their State Workforce Agency.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Scott Gibbons, U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Office of Unemployment Insurance, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Frances Perkins Bldg., Room S-4231, Washington, DC 20210, telephone number (202) 693-3008 (this is not a toll-free number) or by e-mail:                         *gibbons.scott@dol.gov.*

Signed in Washington, DC, this 28th day of March 2011.

Jane Oates,

Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration.

[FR Doc. 2011-7659 Filed 3-31-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FW-P