alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          37,237                   5,389
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,522                  18,978
<ALLOWANCES>                                       500                     800
<INVENTORY>                                      7,050                   7,648
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,498                  38,363
<PP&E>                                          55,955                  46,434
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,161                   5,043
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 196,289                 161,640
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,105                  90,062
<BONDS>                                         13,740                  15,625
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           393                      94
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,480                  29,084
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   196,289                 161,640
<SALES>                                        384,473                 346,904
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               384,473                 346,904
<CGS>                                          382,446                 348,805
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  382,446                 348,805
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,026                      26
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,432                   3,579
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,431                   5,506
<INCOME-TAX>                                       868                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,299                   5,506
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    766                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,533                   5,506
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05                     .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
### §542c. Land use agreement

The Secretary of Agriculture in furtherance of the purposes of this Act, is hereby authorized, and directed, to enter into an appropriate land use agreement with New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology for the Langmuir Research Site for the purpose of establishing conditions for use of the national forest land, and to set forth working relationships during such period of use.

(Pub. L. 96–550, title II, §204, Dec. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 3225.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 96–550, Dec. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 3221, which enacted sections 410ii to 410ii–7 and 542 to 542d of this title and enacted provisions listed in a table of Wilderness Areas set out under section 1132 of this title and provisions listed in tables of Miscellaneous National Monuments and National Monuments Established Under Presidential Proclamation set out under section 320301 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
#### § 222.50 What definitions apply to this subpart?

In addition to the terms referenced or defined in § 222.2, the following definitions apply to this subpart:

*Child with a disability* as defined in 34 CFR 300.8.

*Early intervention services* as defined in 34 CFR 303.13.

*Free appropriate public education* or *FAPE* as defined in 34 CFR 300.17.

*Individualized education program* or *IEP* as defined in 34 CFR 300.22.

*Individualized family service plan* or *IFSP* as defined in 34 CFR 303.20.

*Infant or toddler with a disability* as defined in 34 CFR 303.21.

*Infants, toddlers, and children with disabilities,* for these regulations, means both a “child with a disability” as defined in 34 CFR 300.8 and an “infant or toddler with a disability” as defined in 34 CFR 303.21.

*Related services* as defined in 34 CFR 300.34.

*Special education* as defined in 34 CFR 300.39.

[80 FR 33166, June 11, 2015, as amended at 82 FR 31912, July 11, 2017]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7709]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday April 1, 2011.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-7709 Filed 3-29-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 81257 / July 31, 2017

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-17791

In the Matter of 

ORTHOFIX INTERNATIONAL N.V.,

Respondent. 

ORDER APPOINTING

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

By order dated June 30, 2017, the Commission issued the “Omnibus Order Directing the 

Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that Establish Distribution 

Funds” (“Omnibus Order”),1authorizing the Secretary to issue orders beginning June 2017 and 

for calendar year 2018 appointing, upon request by the Commission staff, Miller Kaplan Arase 

LLP, a certified public accounting firm, which acquired Damasco & Associates LLP (“Miller 

Kaplan”), with one of their offices located in Half Moon Bay, California, as tax administrator 

(“Tax Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund may incur taxrelated obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department of the 

Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On July 19, 2017, the Commission staff requested, pursuant to the Omnibus Order, the 

appointment of Miller Kaplan as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced 

proceeding. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Miller Kaplan, pursuant to and in accordance with the 

Omnibus Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced 

proceeding. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Brent J. Fields

Secretary

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 81057 (June 30, 2017).
# L_2013141EN.01S00301.xml

| 28.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 141/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 141/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dental Patient Care America, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Silva, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| August 11, 2008 | /s/ Michael Silva |
|-----------------|-------------------|

|   | Michael Silva |
|--------|---------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|
#### § 289.3 Recording the entry of certain American Indians born in Canada.

The lawful admission for permanent residence of an American Indian born in Canada shall be recorded on Form I-181.

[33 FR 7485, May 21, 1968]
§ 396.20 What must be included in an application? Each applicant shall include in the application— ( a ) A description of the manner in which the proposed interpreter training program will be developed and operated during the five-year period following the award of the grant;
( b ) A description of the communication needs for training interpreters for the population(s) or in the geographical area(s) to be served by the project;
( c ) A description of the applicant's capacity or potential for providing training of interpreters for individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing and interpreters for individuals who are deaf-blind that is evidence-based, and based on promising practices when evidence-based practices are not available;
( d ) An assurance that any interpreter trained or retrained under this program shall meet those standards of competency for a qualified professional, that the Secretary may establish;
( e ) An assurance that the project shall cooperate or coordinate its activities, as appropriate, with the activities of other projects funded under this program;
( f ) The descriptions required in 34 CFR 385.45 with regard to the training of individuals with disabilities, including those from minority groups, for rehabilitation careers; and
( g ) Such other information as the Secretary may require.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0018) (Authority: Sections 12(c), 21(c), and 302(f) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c), 718(c), and 772(f))
### Faulk, Scott (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Subject: Brennan Lee-Namakaeha <keanu_1992@live.com> Wednesday, April 23, 2014 11:03 PM EAS (OST) In Support of MAKANI KAI for EAS

As a resident of Kalaupapa I am STILL in continued support ofMakani Kai forthe EAS I Kalaupapa! Thankyou ·foryour consideration!

Brennan Lee-Namakaeha

1
§ 645.13 How are regular Upward Bound projects organized? ( a ) Regular Upward Bound projects— ( 1 ) Must provide participants with a summer instructional component that is designed to simulate a college-going experience for participants, and an academic year component; and
( 2 ) May provide a summer bridge component to those Upward Bound participants who have graduated from secondary school and intend to enroll in an institution of higher education in the following fall term. A summer bridge component provides participants with services and activities, including college courses, that aid in the transition from secondary education to postsecondary education.
( b ) A summer instructional component shall— ( 1 ) Be six weeks in length unless the grantee can demonstrate to the Secretary that a shorter period will not hinder the effectiveness of the project nor prevent the project from achieving its goals and objectives, and the Secretary approves that shorter period; and
( 2 ) Provide participants with one or more of the services described in § 645.11 at least five days per week.
( c ) ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, an academic year component shall provide program participants with one or more of the services described in § 645.11 on a weekly basis throughout the academic year and, to the extent possible, shall not prevent participants from fully participating in academic and nonacademic activities at the participants' secondary school.
( 2 ) If an Upward Bound project's location or the project's staff are not readily accessible to participants because of distance or lack of transportation, the grantee may, with the Secretary's permission, provide project services to participants every two weeks during the academic year.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-13)
[60 FR 4748, Jan. 24, 1995. Redesignated at 75 FR 65785, Oct. 26, 2010]
### §2336. Other limitations

(a) Acts of War.—No action shall be maintained under section 2333 of this title for injury or loss by reason of an act of war.

(b) Limitation on Discovery.—If a party to an action under section 2333 seeks to discover the investigative files of the Department of Justice, the Assistant Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, or Attorney General may object on the ground that compliance will interfere with a criminal investigation or prosecution of the incident, or a national security operation related to the incident, which is the subject of the civil litigation. The court shall evaluate any such objections in camera and shall stay the discovery if the court finds that granting the discovery request will substantially interfere with a criminal investigation or prosecution of the incident or a national security operation related to the incident. The court shall consider the likelihood of criminal prosecution by the Government and other factors it deems to be appropriate. A stay of discovery under this subsection shall constitute a bar to the granting of a motion to dismiss under rules 12(b)(6) and 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If the court grants a stay of discovery under this subsection, it may stay the action in the interests of justice.

(c) Stay of Action for Civil Remedies.—(1) The Attorney General may intervene in any civil action brought under section 2333 for the purpose of seeking a stay of the civil action. A stay shall be granted if the court finds that the continuation of the civil action will substantially interfere with a criminal prosecution which involves the same subject matter and in which an indictment has been returned, or interfere with national security operations related to the terrorist incident that is the subject of the civil action. A stay may be granted for up to 6 months. The Attorney General may petition the court for an extension of the stay for additional 6-month periods until the criminal prosecution is completed or dismissed.

(2) In a proceeding under this subsection, the Attorney General may request that any order issued by the court for release to the parties and the public omit any reference to the basis on which the stay was sought.

(Added Pub. L. 102–572, title X, §1003(a)(4), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4523.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (b), are set out in the Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to any pending case or any cause of action arising on or after 4 years before Oct. 29, 1992, see section 1003(c) of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 2331 of this title.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-2315

BRUCE T. ADKINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Catherine C. Blake, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-01810-CCB)

Submitted: February 22, 2024 Decided: February 26, 2024

Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce T. Adkins, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Patrick Redmond, BALTIMORE CITY LAW 

DEPARTMENT, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2315 Doc: 14 Filed: 02/26/2024 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM:

Bruce T. Adkins appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his due process and 

state law claims against the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore and denying his motion 

to vacate. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendant. Adkins v. 

Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, No. 1:21-cv-01810-CCB (D. Md. filed Aug. 31, 

2022 & entered Sept. 1, 2022). 

The district court retained jurisdiction to rule on Adkins’ motion to vacate, filed 

within 28 days of judgment and construed as a Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion, see MLC 

Auto., LLC v. Town of S. Pines, 532 F.3d 269, 277 (4th Cir. 2008) (construing motion 

seeking reconsideration as a Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion if filed within 28 days of district 

court’s final order), even though Adkins’ appeal was pending. See Wolfe v. Clarke, 718 

F.3d 277, 281 n.3 (4th Cir. 2013) (explaining that, although “a duly filed notice of appeal 

deprives a district court of jurisdiction over all issues relating to the subject matter thereof,” 

the court may “proceed as to matters in aid of the appeal” (internal quotation marks 

omitted)). However, because Adkins did not file an amended notice of appeal following 

the district court’s order denying his motion to vacate, he failed to perfect an appeal as to 

that order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(ii). We therefore dismiss the appeal as that order 

to the extent that Adkins intended to appeal it.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2315 Doc: 14 Filed: 02/26/2024 Pg: 2 of 3
3

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART,

DISMISSED IN PART

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2315 Doc: 14 Filed: 02/26/2024 Pg: 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM TELCO-TECHNOLOGY, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                          6,613
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   198,006
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                6,613
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  204,619
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           93,042
<BONDS>                         0
<COMMON>                        8,870
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                      102,707
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    111,577
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                120,852
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (120,852)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (120,852)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (120,852)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.01)



</TABLE>
### §7408. International cooperation and assistance

#### (a) Assistance to developing nations and international organizations

Consistent with existing authority and the availability of funds, the Secretary shall provide appropriate assistance to developing nations and international organizations of which such nations are members to assist those nations in meeting their obligations under the Agreement.

#### (b) Personnel, services, equipment, and facilities

In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary may, by agreement, on a reimbursable or nonreimbursable basis, utilize the personnel, services, equipment, and facilities of any Federal, State, local, or foreign government or any entity of any such government.

(Pub. L. 114–81, title III, §309, Nov. 5, 2015, 129 Stat. 669.)
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

I, Stuart R. Lloyd, Chief Financial Officer (principal financialofficer) of PEC Solutions, Inc. (the “Registrant”), certify that to the best ofmy knowledge, based upon review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2004 of the Registrant (the “Report”):

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| /s/ STUART R. LLOYD |                |
|---------------------|---------------------|
| Name:               | Stuart R. Lloyd     |
| Date:               | August 9, 2004 |
|                     |                     |  |

 

----
### §690i. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Apr. 23, 1928, ch. 413, §8, 45 Stat. 450, authorized the appropriation of $350,000 for purposes of sections 690 to 690h of this title, including $50,000 for purchase of land and improvements thereon.
### §3670. Disposition of conveyances seized for violation of the Indian liquor laws

The provisions of section 3668 of this title shall apply to any conveyances seized, proceeded against by libel, or forfeited under the provisions of section 3113 or 3669 of this title for having been used in introducing or attempting to introduce intoxicants into the Indian country or into other places where such introduction is prohibited by treaty or enactment of Congress.

(Added Oct. 24, 1951, ch. 546, §2, 65 Stat. 609, §3619; renumbered §3670 and amended Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §§212(a)(1), 223(k), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1987, 2029.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–473 renumbered section 3619 of this title as this section and substituted "3668" for "3617" and "3669" for "3618".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by section 223(k) of Pub. L. 98–473 effective Nov. 1, 1987, and applicable only to offenses committed after the taking effect of such amendment, see section 235(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3551 of this title.