alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4843 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4843

         To authorize the Susan Harwood Training Grant Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 23, 2019

     Mr. Pocan (for himself, Mr. Courtney, Ms. Norton, Ms. Lee of 
    California, Ms. Wild, Mrs. Watson Coleman, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. 
 Norcross, Mr. Nadler, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Wilson of 
 Florida, Ms. Tlaib, Mr. Levin of Michigan, Ms. Meng, and Mr. Takano) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To authorize the Susan Harwood Training Grant Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Susan Harwood Training Grant Program 
Authorization Act''.

SEC. 2. SUSAN HARWOOD TRAINING GRANT PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.

    Section 21 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (c) to read as follows:
    ``(c) The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Health 
and Human Services, shall (1) provide for the establishment and 
supervision of programs for the education and training of employers and 
employees in the recognition, avoidance, and prevention of unsafe or 
unhealthful working conditions and in employee rights and employer 
responsibilities under this Act and (2) consult with and advise 
employers and employees, and organizations representing employers and 
employees as to effective means of preventing occupational injuries and 
illnesses.''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) The Secretary shall create a program known as the Susan 
Harwood Training Grant Program to competitively award grants to 
nonprofit organizations, employer associations, labor unions, and 
institutions of higher education supported by State and local 
governments to provide training and education programs for employers 
and workers on the recognition, avoidance, and prevention of safety and 
health hazards in workplaces and to inform workers of their rights and 
employers of their responsibilities under the Occupational Safety and 
Health Act (including grants to develop or expand the capacity of such 
organizations to provide safety and health training, education, and 
related assistance to the targeted audiences, grants for the training 
of employees and employers on occupational safety and health hazards of 
particular concern or for particular industries, or groups of workers 
at high risk of injury, illness, or exposure to hazards, and grants for 
the development of training materials on particular topics).''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 245a.32 Ineligible aliens. The following categories of aliens are ineligible for Family Unity benefits under the LIFE Act Amendments: ( a ) An alien who has been convicted of a felony or of three or more misdemeanors in the United States; or
( b ) An alien who has ordered, incited, assisted, or otherwise participated in the persecution of an individual because of the individual's race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion; or
( c ) An alien who has been convicted by a final judgment of a particularly serious crime and who is a danger to the community of the United States; or
( d ) An alien who the Attorney General has serious reasons to believe has committed a serious nonpolitical crime outside the United States before the alien arrived in the United States; or
( e ) An alien who the Attorney General has reasonable grounds to believe is a danger to the security of the United States.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 599

 571

 612

 612

 611

 624

 618

 612

 611

 610

 614

 628

 640

 647

 652

 663

 656

 667

 682

 638

 614

 663

 657

 646

 642

 663

 659

 691

 707

 701

 703

 565

 567

 566

 565

 577

 589

 602

 596

 602

 602

 604

 611

 628

 632

 623

 634

 626

 628

 615

 610

 601

 612

 638

 629

 634

 639

 654

 661

 696

 675

 571

 581

 569

 583

 581

 590

 606

 610

 603

 606

 607

 609

 618

 634

 638

 635

 643

 637

 635

 640

 624

 612

 639

 642

 639

 638

 653

 655

 675

 702

 688

 632

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 375

 368

 376

 375

 381

 391

 393

 389

 391

 391

 392

 398

 408

 410

 408

 413

 410

 408

 412

 402

 394

 411

 413

 411

 410

 420

 421

 433

 450

 441

 407

TOTAL 19,424

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 502

 498

 535

 571

 529

 492

 484

 455

 459

 492

 513

 532

 560

 579

 585

 566

 585

 668

 696

 637

 629

 612

 591

 640

 680

 709

 675

 681

 647

 595

 687

 356

 351

 356

 361

 381

 395

 406

 391

 402

 408

 415

 441

 447

 449

 444

 432

 437

 429

 468

 453

 474

 464

 481

 460

 460

 481

 485

 480

 492

 482

 478

 392

 396

 400

 412

 419

 424

 424

 424

 432

 445

 457

 471

 479

 477

 482

 477

 488

 502

 517

 519

 524

 526

 534

 543

 549

 559

 563

 555

 542

 529

 533

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:September 2, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 258

 261

 263

 271

 275

 278

 278

 278

 283

 291

 298

 307

 312

 311

 314

 311

 318

 326

 336

 337

 340

 341

 346

 352

 355

 361

 364

 359

 351

 343

 345

TOTAL 14,994

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of P.M.T., a child, * From the 318th District

Court of Midland County,

Trial Court No. AD-32,977.

No. 11-14-00346-CV * June 10, 2015

* Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., 

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by reason 

of this appeal are taxed against Appellants.
§ 222.108 What actions must be taken upon receipt of a complaint? Within 10 working days of receipt of a complaint, the Secretary or his designee— ( a ) Designates a hearing examiner to conduct a hearing;
( b ) Designates a time for the hearing that is no more than 30 days after the designation of a hearing examiner;
( c ) Designates a place for the hearing that, to the extent possible, is— ( 1 ) Near the LEA; or
( 2 ) At another location convenient to the tribe and the LEA, if it is determined that there is good cause to designate another location;
( d ) Notifies the tribe and the LEA of the time, place, and nature of the hearing; and
( e ) Transmits copies of the complaint to the LEA and the affected tribe or tribes.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7704(e))
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Each of the undersignedhereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Watson Wyatt Worldwide, Inc.(the “company”), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to thebest of his knowledge:

 

·      The Quarterly Report of the company on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

·      The information contained in such report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the company.

 

 

Date: May 7, 2009

 
| /s/ John J. Haley                           |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| John J. Haley                               |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer      |
|                                        |
|                                        |
| /s/ Roger F. Millay                         |   |
| Roger F. Millay                             |
| Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toWatson Wyatt Worldwide, Inc. and will be retained by Watson WyattWorldwide, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

----
§ 608.21 What is a comprehensive development plan and what must it contain? ( a ) A comprehensive development plan must describe an institution's strategy for achieving growth and self-sufficiency by strengthening its— ( 1 ) Financial management;
( 2 ) Academic programs; and
( b ) The comprehensive development plan must include the following: ( 1 ) An assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the institution's financial management and academic programs.
( 2 ) A delineation of the institution's goals for its financial management and academic programs, based on the outcomes of the assessment described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( 3 ) A listing of measurable objectives designed to assist the institution to reach each goal with accompanying timeframes for achieving the objectives.
( 4 ) A description of methods, processes, and procedures that will be used by the college or university to institutionalize financial management and academic program practices and improvements developed under the proposed funded activities.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1840-0113) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1063a)
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF C.F.O. PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Randall J. Frapart, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ForeFront Holdings, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying
officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

November 29, 2007



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Randall J. Frapart 
|Randall J. Frapart     
|Chief Financial Officer
§ 361.195 What should States expect when a sanction is applied to the Governor's Reserve Allotment? ( a ) The Secretaries of Labor and Education will reduce the Governor's Reserve Allotment by five percent of the maximum available amount for the immediately succeeding program year if: ( 1 ) The State fails to submit the State annual performance reports as required under WIOA sec. 116(d)(2), as defined in § 361.185;
( 2 ) The State fails to meet State adjusted levels of performance for the same primary performance indicator(s) under either § 361.190(d)(1) for the second consecutive year as defined in § 361.190; or
( 3 ) The State's score on the same indicator for the same program falls below 50 percent under § 361.190(d)(2) for the second consecutive year as defined in § 361.190.
( b ) If the State fails under paragraphs (a)(1) and either (a)(2) or (3) of this section in the same program year, the Secretaries of Labor and Education will reduce the Governor's Reserve Allotment by 10 percent of the maximum available amount for the immediately succeeding program year.
( c ) If a State's Governor's Reserve Allotment is reduced: ( 1 ) The reduced amount will not be returned to the State in the event that the State later improves performance or submits its annual performance report; and
( 2 ) The Governor's Reserve will continue to be set at the reduced level in each subsequent year until the Secretary of Labor or the Secretary of Education, depending on which program is impacted, determines that the State met the State adjusted levels of performance for the applicable primary performance indicators and has submitted all of the required performance reports.
( d ) A State may request review of a sanction the Secretary of Labor imposes in accordance with the provisions of 20 CFR 683.800.
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

102)IV-C-68 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:56 AM Sheet 102 of 232 
i. 

" <•* " 

TM - J,' 

EL2_ 

I ,£, i UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

^ 5SBJ/ WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

,,-,•• FEB i 2 198 

OFFICE OF 

AIRAND11ADUTIOM 

Honorable Hank Brown 

House of Representatives 

Washington, D.C. 20515 

Dear Mr. Brown: 

Thank you for your letter forwarding the concerns of your 

constituent, Ms. Atta Dee Ogden, about our proposed gasoline 

volatility regulations. We will be placing these comments in 

the rulemaking docket.. 

From our analysis of refinery and natural gas liquids 

industry impacts, we expect that implementation of the proposed 

RVP reduction to 9 psi in Class C areas (and proportionally 

elsewhere) would remove a significant quantity of butane from 

use as a gasoline component. Most of this butane is currently 

produced by refineries, but a significant portion comes from 

natural gas processing facilities. 

We concluded that a substantial portion will be purchased 

(as a petrochemical feedstock, for example) with only a small 

decrease in price. The average increase in the price of 

gasoline would be about one cent per gallon. Regarding emission 

reductions, our analysis concludes that the proposed volatility 

reductions represent the single largest source of motor vehicle 

VOC control available (a nationwide reduction of about eight 

percent). 

Volatility controls might increase oil imports under 

certain circumstances, but the overall effect is not likely to 

be severe. Volatility reductions would clearly require 

additional hydrocarbon refinery stocks. If refineries purchase 

crude oil for this replacement stock, much of it may be 

imported. Offsetting this, however, would be the reduction in 

current butane imports resulting from the surplus domestic 

supply of butane. Alternatively, if most refiners use the 

surplus butane as the replacement hydrocarbon stock (through 

alkylation or conversion to MTBE), any effects on energy imports 

would be small. We will continue to analyze this issue. 
P.3 

- 2-

Our analyses of the environmental and economic impacts of 

a summertime volatility control program may be found in the 

Federal Register notice and our Draft Regulatory Impact 

Analysis, available through Tad Wysor of my Ann Arbor staff 

(313-668-4332). 

We had a public hearing in October and expect to receive 

numerous additional comments on this rulemaking before the end 

of the comment period (February 11, 1988). We will fully 

consider all of these comments in developing our final 

regulatory analysis. 

Let me know if we can be of further assistance. 

Sincerely yours, 

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY 1 

RICHARD D. WILSON f 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

Prepared by: Form Letter:sal:2/8/88:AL880465 - ECTD, Ann Arbor, MI 

bcc: Region 08 

Congressional Liaison 

Docket No. A-85-21 c/o Jackie McManus
Exhibit 10.50

SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT

This
SECOND AMENDMENT is made as of the 2ndday of November, 2005, between PETER GROVER(hereinafter referred to
as Employee) and TRX Europe, Ltd., a company incorporated in England and Wales under number 3841799 whose registered office is at Sutherland House, Russell Way, Crawley, West Sussex, RH10 1 UH, UK (hereinafter referred to as the
Company).

WHEREAS, Employee and the Company previously entered into that certain Employment Contract dated as of
1 January 2004, as amended on 28 April 2005, (the Employment Contract); and

WHEREAS, Employee and the Company
desire to further amend certain terms and provisions of the Employment Contract;

NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the sum of
Ten and no. 100 Dollars ($10.00) in hand paid each to the other and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Employee and the Company hereby agree to amend the Employment Contract as
follows:

1. Section 3(c) of the Employment Contract is amended by deleting the paragraph and replacing it with the following:

Automobile. Effective 1 December 2005, Employee shall receive a monthly automobile allowance of £1,500.00 in cash to assist him
in obtaining and maintaining an automobile for his business use. Employee shall be responsible for any and all costs and liabilities, including insurance, related to such automobile. This is a taxable benefit and appropriate deductions will be
applicable.

2. Except as specifically amended herein, the Employment Contract, as previously amended, shall remain in full force and
effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Second Amendment as of the date first above written.



EMPLOYEE:/s/ Peter GroverPeter Grover




COMPANY:TRX Europe, Ltd.By:

/s/ Timothy J. SevertTimothy J. SevertEVP, Administration




1
#### Westchester Trust Company, as Executor, etc., Respondent, v. Helen W. Condon and Others, Appellants.

Motion denied, without costs, without prejudice to an application by the guardian *ad litem*to amend the notice of appeal. The court will entertain an application for advancement of the argument of the appeal if deemed proper by the parties. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 885

 885

 884

 813

 805

 820

 798

 816

 804

 791

 793

 816

 810

 832

 831

 839

 853

 844

 846

 886

 804

 893

 902

 900

 863

 889

 860

 886

 920

 919

 920

 809

 764

 787

 774

 776

 780

 768

 773

 760

 760

 763

 792

 790

 792

 792

 808

 823

 822

 830

 806

 792

 800

 856

 863

 856

 853

 839

 861

 887

 893

 894

 851

 829

 824

 794

 788

 799

 781

 785

 777

 778

 776

 805

 796

 814

 810

 821

 832

 830

 839

 854

 796

 868

 882

 878

 859

 871

 846

 873

 908

 902

 906

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 5, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 542

 528

 525

 507

 503

 510

 499

 501

 496

 497

 496

 513

 508

 519

 517

 523

 530

 529

 535

 544

 508

 552

 561

 559

 547

 554

 539

 556

 577

 573

 576

TOTAL 25,772

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21