alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN, INC



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*



In
connection with the Annual Report of California Pizza Kitchen, Inc (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Richard L. Rosenfield, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



April 4, 2005



By:

/s/    RICHARD L.
ROSENFIELDRichard L. Rosenfield Co-Chief Executive Officer




|* | This certificate accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to
the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 18-13884-KHK Doc 20 Filed 11/28/18 Entered 11/29/18 12:12:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 5
Case 18-13884-KHK Doc 20 Filed 11/28/18 Entered 11/29/18 12:12:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 5
Case 18-13884-KHK Doc 20 Filed 11/28/18 Entered 11/29/18 12:12:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 5
Case 18-13884-KHK Doc 20 Filed 11/28/18 Entered 11/29/18 12:12:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 5
Case 18-13884-KHK Doc 20 Filed 11/28/18 Entered 11/29/18 12:12:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 5
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4975 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4975

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1201 Sycamore Square Drive in Midlothian, Virginia, as the ``Dorothy 
                  Braden Bruce Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 1, 2019

  Ms. Spanberger (for herself, Mr. Cline, Mrs. Luria, Ms. Wexton, Mr. 
Wittman, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Mr. McEachin, Mr. Griffith, Mr. Beyer, 
 Mr. Connolly, and Mr. Riggleman) introduced the following bill; which 
         was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1201 Sycamore Square Drive in Midlothian, Virginia, as the ``Dorothy 
                  Braden Bruce Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DOROTHY BRADEN BRUCE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1201 Sycamore Square Drive in Midlothian, Virginia, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Dorothy Braden Bruce Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dorothy 
Braden Bruce Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
H. R. 4983 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient clinic 

in Gilbert, Arizona, as the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Alexander W. Conrad Veterans Affairs 

Health Care Clinic’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

Congress finds the following: 

(1) Staff Sergeant Alexander W. Conrad of Chandler, 

Arizona, joined the United States Army on June 1, 2010. 

(2) Staff Sergeant Conrad’s decorated service includes two 

deployments to Afghanistan in support of Operation Enduring 

Freedom. 

(3) Staff Sergeant Conrad subsequently deployed to Africa 

in support of Operation Octave Shield, while assigned to 1st 

Battalion, 3rd Special Forces Group, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, as a Human Intelligence Noncommissioned Officer. 

(4) On June 8, 2018, Staff Sergeant Conrad died in Somalia 

from injuries sustained from indirect enemy fire. 

(5) Staff Sergeant Conrad was posthumously awarded the 

Purple Heart, Bronze Star with Valor, and Meritorious Service 

Medal. 

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF STAFF SERGEANT ALEXANDER W. CONRAD 

VETERANS AFFAIRS HEALTH CARE CLINIC. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The Southeast Veterans Affairs Health Care 

Clinic located at 3285 South Val Vista Drive, Gilbert, Arizona, 

shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known and 

designated as the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Alexander W. Conrad Veterans 

Affairs Health Care Clinic’’. 

(b) REFERENCE.—Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 
H. R. 4983—2 

to the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Alexander W. Conrad Veterans Affairs Health 

Care Clinic’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# Official Journal C 108A/10 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 108A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5710 April 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 108A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5710 April 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2014/C 108A/01 | Notice of open competition EPSO/AST/132/14 — Security Profile 1 — Digital monitoring officers and open source intelligence specialists (AST 3) Profile 2 — Prevention and surveillance coordinators (AST 3) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2014/C 108A/01

Notice of open competition EPSO/AST/132/14 — Security Profile 1 — Digital monitoring officers and open source intelligence specialists (AST 3) Profile 2 — Prevention and surveillance coordinators (AST 3)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 108A/02 | Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals | 10 |

2014/C 108A/02

Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals

10

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Anthony LAMBERT, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward E. WEBB, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Gates County, North Carolina; Kevin L. Byrd, individually and in his offi*924cial capacity as Sergeant of Gates County, North Carolina; Gates County, North Carolina; Gates County Defendants, Defendants-Appellees, and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland; E.W. Jones, individually, Defendants.

No. 01-2358.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 24, 2002.

Decided May 20, 2002.

Anthony Lambert, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark Allen Davis, Tamara Paragino Williams Desai, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge *&*Rice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Lambert, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to remand the action to state court and dismissing the action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(b), 41(b). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Lambert v. Webb,*No. CA-00-60-2-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 13, 2001; Sept. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
§ 280.40 What costs are allowable? An LEA or consortium of LEAs may use funds received under this part for the following activities: ( a ) Planning and promotional activities directly related to the development, expansion, continuation, or enhancement of academic programs and services offered at magnet schools, though planning activities are subject to the restrictions in § 280.41(a) and do not include activities described under paragraph (f) of this section.
( b ) The acquisition of books, materials, and equipment (including computers) and the maintenance and operation of materials, equipment and computers. Any books, materials or equipment purchased with grant funds must be: ( 1 ) Necessary for the conduct of programs in magnet schools; and
( 2 ) Directly related to improving student academic achievement based on the State's challenging academic content standards and student academic achievement standards or directly related to improving student reading skills or knowledge of mathematics, science, history, geography, English, foreign languages, art, or music, or to improving vocational, technological, or professional skills.
( c ) The payment or subsidization of the compensation of elementary and secondary school teachers: ( 1 ) Who are highly qualified;
( 2 ) Who are necessary to conduct programs in magnet schools; and
( 3 ) Whose employment is directly related to improving student academic achievement based on the State's challenging academic content standards and student academic achievement standards or directly related to improving student reading skills or knowledge of mathematics, science, history, geography, English, foreign languages, art, or music, or to improving vocational, technological, or professional skills.
( d ) The payment or subsidization of the compensation of instructional staff, where applicable, who satisfy the requirements of paragraphs (c)(2) and (3) of this section.
( e ) With respect to a magnet school program offered to less than the entire school population, for instructional activities that— ( 1 ) Are designed to make available the special curriculum of the magnet school program to students enrolled in the school, but not in the magnet school program; and
( 2 ) Further the purposes of the program.
( f ) Activities, which may include professional development, that will build the recipient's capacity to operate magnet school programs once the grant period has ended.
( g ) Activities to enable the LEA or consortium of LEAs to have more flexibility in the administration of a magnet school program in order to serve students attending a school who are not enrolled in a magnet school program.
( h ) Activities to enable the LEA or consortium of LEAs to have flexibility in designing magnet schools for students in all grades.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7231f)
[51 FR 20414, June 4, 1986, as amended at 54 FR 19509, May 5, 1989; 60 FR 14866, Mar. 20, 1995; 69 FR 4997, Feb. 2, 2004]
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.18

                     McLaren Performance Technologies, Inc.

                               September 23, 2002

Amherst H. Turner
401 East Stadium
Ann Arbor, MI 48014

         RE:   Amendment to Warrant and Subordinated Convertible Note

Dear Amherst:

     This letter amends the (i) Warrant, dated March 24, 2002, to purchase
37,500 shares at $1.00 a share (the "Warrant") issued by McLaren Performance
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"); and (ii) Subordinated Convertible Promissory
Note, dated March 24, 2002, in the amount of $250,000 issued by the Company (the
"Note"), as set forth below. Capitalized terms not defined herein have the
meaning given to them in the Warrant or Note, as applicable.

     You agree that in no event may the number of shares issued, in the
aggregate, pursuant to the Warrant and Note exceed 25,000 (the "Cap") without
the prior approval of the Company's stockholders, if such approval is required
by any applicable NASD or other market rule. In the event that an applicable
NASD or other market rule does require approval, the Company agrees to include a
proposal in its proxy statement, for the Annual Meeting to be held in 2003,
whereby the Board of Directors recommends to the stockholders the approval of
the potential issuance of 37,500 shares pursuant to the Warrant and the issuance
of that number of shares (which may exceed 25,000) that could be issued upon a
conversion of the Note.

     Section 2(a) of the Note is hereby amended to read in its entirety:

     "(a) Conversion by the Company. At any time any principal is outstanding,
by providing notice in accordance with Section 10 hereof (the "Conversion
Notice") to the Holder, the Company may cause the Holder to convert any portion
or the full amount of the then outstanding principal (the "Conversion
Principal") into that number of shares of the Company's common stock
("Conversion Shares") determined in the manner set forth in Section 2(c)
hereof."

     The Company hereby provides the Conversion Notice to the Holder notifying
the Holder that the Company requests, and the Holder agrees, to convert $6,500
into 25,000 shares of the Company's common stock, based on a Per Share Market
Price of $.26. The Notice Date is the date hereof.

     Except as specifically amended hereby, the Warrant and the Note shall
continue in full force and effect in accordance with their terms.

     Please indicate your agreement with the foregoing by executing the enclosed
copy of this letter and returning it to me.

                                       -1-

<PAGE>

                              MCLAREN PERFORMANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


                              By:/s/ Chris J. Panzl
                                 --------------------------------
                                 Name: Chris J. Panzl
                                 Its: Chief Financial Officer

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:


/s/ Amherst H. Turner
---------------------
Amherst H. Turner

                                       -2-
§ 511.311 Real-time information program establishment. ( a ) *Requirement.* States shall establish real-time information programs that are consistent with the parameters defined under § 511.309. The real-time information program shall be established to take advantage of the existing traffic and travel condition monitoring capabilities, and build upon them where applicable. The real-time information program shall include traffic and travel condition information for, as a minimum, all the Interstate highways operated by the State. In addition, the real-time information program shall complement current transportation performance reporting systems by making it easier to gather or enhance required information.
( b ) *Data quality.* States shall develop the methods by which data quality can be ensured to the data consumers. The criteria for defining the validity of traffic and travel conditions made available from real-time information programs shall be established by the States in collaboration with their partners for establishing the programs. States shall receive FHWA's concurrence that the selected methods provide reasonable checks of the quality of the information made available by the real-time information program. In requesting FHWA's concurrence, the State shall demonstrate to FHWA how the selected methods gauge the accuracy and availability of the real-time information and the remedial actions if the information quality falls below the levels described in § 511.309(a)(5) and § 511.309(a)(6).
( c ) *Participation.* The establishment, or the enhancement, of a real-time information program should include participation from the following agencies: Highway agencies; public safety agencies (e.g., police, fire, emergency/medical); transit operators; and other operating agencies necessary to sustain mobility through the region and/or the metropolitan area. Nothing in this subpart is intended to alter the existing relationships among State, regional, and local agencies.
( d ) *Update of Regional ITS Architecture.* All States and regions that have created a Regional ITS Architecture in accordance with Section 940 in Title 23 CFR shall evaluate their Regional ITS Architectures to determine whether the Regional ITS Architectures explicitly address real-time highway and transit information needs and the methods needed to meet such needs. Traffic and travel conditions monitoring needs for all Interstate system highways shall be considered. If necessary, the Regional ITS Architectures shall be updated to address coverage, monitoring systems, data fusion and archiving, and accessibility to highway and transit information for other States and for value added information product providers. The Regional ITS Architecture shall feature the components and functionality of the real-time information program.
( e ) *Effective date.* Establishment of the real-time information program for traffic and travel conditions on the Interstate system highways shall be completed no later than November 8, 2014.
#### Marx Goodman, Respondent, v. William E. Kling, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000, as amended, (Pub. L. 110-343), the Boise, Payette, Salmon-Challis, and Sawtooth National Forests' Southwest Idaho Resource Advisory Committee will conduct a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

# DATES:

Thursday, April 21, 2011, beginning at 9 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Idaho Counties Risk Management Program Building, 3100 South Vista Avenue, Boise, Idaho.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda topics will include review and approval of project proposals, and is an open public forum.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kim Pierson, Designated Federal Official, at (208) 347-0301 or e-mail                         *kpierson@fs.fed.us.*

Dated: March 24, 2011.

Suzanne C. Rainville,

Forest Supervisor, Payette National Forest.

[FR Doc. 2011-7748 Filed 3-31-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Appeals of

-- ) ) Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc

.. ) ) Under ContractNo. W9124A-04-C-001 l ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 59802, 59856 60016,60306

Brett W. Johnson, Esq. Colin P. Ahler, Esq.

Snell & WilmerLLP Phoenix, 

### AZ Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney MAJ Jamal A. Rhinehardt, JA

Trial Attorney ORDERREGARDING PARTIES' REQUEST FORAN ORDERPURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 502(D) The parties request that the Board issue an orderpursuant to FED. R. EVID. 502(d). That rule provides that: A federal court may orderthat the [attorney-client] privilege or [attorney workproduct] protection is not waived by disclosure connected with the litigation pending before the court-in which event the disclosure is also not a waiver in any other federal or state proceeding. We deny the parties' request. The Board is not a federal court; consequently, Rule 502(d) does not authorize the Board to issue an order that would determine whether a disclosure connected with the appeals before it would be a waiver in "any other federal or state proceeding." In the alternative, the parties request a protective order, butthe parties on 3 December 2015 agreed between themselves that: [A] Party's inadvertent disclosure orproduction ofany documents or information in this proceeding shall not, for purposes ofthis proceeding or any otherproceeding in any other court, constitute a waiver by that Party ofany privilege or protection applicable to those documents, including the attorney-client privilege, workproduct protection and any otherprivilege orprotection recognized by law.In view ofthat agreement, the parties do notpersuade us that a protective order is needed. Although the parties point out that, pursuantto FED. R. EVID. 502(e), "[a]n agreement on the effect ofdisclosure in a federal proceeding is binding only on the parties to the agreement, unless it is incorporated into a court order," again, the Board is not a court; consequently, Rule 502 does not authorize the Boardto bind non-parties to the parties' agreement. Nor do we find authority in our own rules to do so. Forthese reasons, the parties' requests are denied. Dated: 8 February 2016

I concur

# ~~ Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I concur

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Opinion and Decision ofthe Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals in ASBCA Nos. 59802, 59856, 60016, 60306, Appeals ofSulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
§ 628.47 What shall a grantee record and report? A grantee shall— ( a ) Keep records of— ( 1 ) The source, kind and amount of matching funds;
( 2 ) The type and amount of investments of the endowment fund;
( 3 ) The amount of endowment fund income; and
( 4 ) The amount and purpose of expenditures of endowment fund income;
( b ) Retain each year's records for a minimum of five years after the grant period ends;
( c ) Allow the Secretary access to information that the Secretary judges necessary to audit or examine the records required in paragraph (a) of this section;
( d ) Carry out the audit required in 2 CFR part 200, subpart F;
( e ) Comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR 200.512; and
( f ) Submit reports on a timely basis that are requested by the Secretary.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1840-0564) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1065 and 1232f)
[49 FR 28521, July 12, 1984, as amended at 52 FR 11258, Apr. 8, 1987; 53 FR 49146, Dec. 6, 1988; 58 FR 11164, Feb. 23, 1993; 79 FR 76101, Dec. 19, 2014]
#### In the Matter of Otto C. Haas against William Wilson, as Commissioner of the Department of Housing and Buildings of the City of New York, et al.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Aqua Mfg. Co., Inc., Respondent, and H. Warshow *&*Sons, Inc., Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ. [179 Misc. 949.]