alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6540

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BOBBY HAZEL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CR-93-62-A; CA-03-211-AM)

Submitted: May 21, 2004 Decided: July 14, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bobby Hazel, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen E. Campbell, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Bobby Hazel seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and denying his

motion for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). The orders

are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Hazel has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We also deny the motion to amend the certificate of

appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 395.12 Access to program and financial information.

Each blind vendor under this part shall be provided access to all financial data of the State licensing agency relevant to the operation of the State vending facility program, including quarterly and annual financial reports, provided that such disclosure does not violate applicable Federal or State laws pertaining to the disclosure of confidential information. Insofar as practicable, such data shall be made available in braille or recorded tape. At the request of a blind vendor State licensing agency staff shall arrange a convenient time to assist in the interpretation of such financial data.
### §3557. Review of a sentence

The review of a sentence imposed pursuant to section 3551 is governed by the provisions of section 3742.

(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §212(a)(2), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1991.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Nov. 1, 1987, and applicable only to offenses committed after the taking effect of this section, see section 235(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as a note under section 3551 of this title.
#### Frank Haynes, Executor, Appellant, v. William H. McDonald, Appellee.

This case is controlled by the decision in Haynes v. McDonald, 158 Ill. App. 294.

Appeal from, the Circuit Court of McDonough county; the Hon. George W. Thompson, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the May term, 1910.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed December 7, 1910.

Elting & Hainline, for appellant; Don P. Pennywitt, of counsel.

Flack & Lawyer, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Philbrick

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action brought by appellant against appellee to recover rent alleged by appellant to be due the estate of his testator, Josiah McDonald, from appellee by reason of the demise of certain premises to appellee by Josiah McDonald in his lifetime.

The premises were demised for one year and before the expiration of the year appellant’s testator died, and the land which he had demised in his lifetime to appellee was devised by his will to various parties or was inherited by his heirs by descent. The manner in which it thus passed from the testator is immaterial for the determination of this cause.

Appellant does not aver in his declaration that under the terms of the demise any time was fixed or determined when the rent should be paid but relies for a recovery wholly upon section 94, chapter 3 of Hurd’s Revised Statutes, and the determination by the appellant executor that in his opinion it was for the best interest of the estate to use this rent for the payment of debts against the estate of testator.

The identical questions involved in this case were involved in the case of Haynes, Executor, v. W. A. Mc*311McDonald, 158 Ill. App. 294, and the facts and circumstances in this case being identical with the facts in that case, and the law applicable thereto the same, this case is controlled by what is there said, and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
****EXHIBIT 32.1****

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906****OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of **VisualMED Clinical Solutions Corp.** (the “Company”)for the quarter ended December 31st, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerard Dab, PrincipalExecutive Officer, Secretary and a member of the Board of Directors of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|   | */s/    Gerard Dab*                               |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                   |
|   | Gerard Dab                                             |
|   | Principal Executive Officer, Secretary and    a member |
|   | of the Board of Directors                              |
|   |                                                   |
|   | February 13th, 2007                               |

 

     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemedfiled by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78r), as amended. 

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 23(b)





                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Hunt Corporation Savings
Plan Forms S-8 Registration Statements (Registration Nos. 33-6359 and 33-57103)
of our report dated June 18, 1998 on our audits of the financial statements of
the Hunt Corporation Savings Plan as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and for the
years ended December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995 which report is included in this
Form 10-K/A which is Amendment No. 1 to Hunt Corporation's 1997 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.



COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.




2400 Eleven Penn Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
June 29, 1998
#### John Alvin Young, Respondent, v. Archibald S. White, Appellant.

(No. 2.)

Appeal by defendant from an order entered in the New York county clerk’s office July 1,1913, denying a motion to vacate a prior order.

McLaughlin, J.:

This appeal is from an order denying a motion to vacate a prior order. Such prior order has been modified by this court in a decision handed down herewith. *(Young*v. *White, No. 2, ante,*p. 885.) This appeal, therefore, is dismissed, without costs to either party. Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ., concurred. Appeal dismissed. Order to be settled on notice.
§ 367.40 Under what circumstances does the Secretary award discretionary grants to States? ( a ) In the case of a fiscal year for which the amount appropriated under section 753 of the Act is less than $13,000,000, the Secretary awards discretionary grants under this part on a competitive basis to States in accordance with section 752(b) of the Act and EDGAR regulations at 34 CFR part 75 (Direct Grant Programs).
( b ) The Secretary awards noncompetitive continuation grants for a multi-year project to pay for the costs of activities for which a grant was awarded under this part—as long as the grantee satisfies the applicable requirements in this part, the terms of the grant, and 34 CFR 75.250 through 75.253 (Approval of Multi-year Projects).
( c ) Subparts A, C, D, and F of this part govern the award of competitive grants under this part.
(Authority: Section 752(b) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 796k(b); 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474)
g:\blm\buttermp\ams\FinalFigures\Fig2-12_FireCondCls1117.mxd 

Jefferson County 

§ ̈¦15 

Broadwater County 

£¤12 Townsend 

Boulder 

Anaconda 

§ ̈¦90 

Deerlodge County 

£¤287 

Butte 

Silverbow County Gallatin County 

§ ̈¦15 

Whitehall 

Three Forks 

Belgrade 

Bozeman 

I low departure moderate grass/shrub urban Fire Condition Classes 

moderate departure agriculture water Butte Field Office - EIS 0 Miles 10 high departure rock/barren snow/ice RMP Planning Area, Montana No warranty is made by the Bureau of Map

Land Management (BLM) for use of Location
 FIGURE 2-12b 

data for purposes not intended by BLM.
EDUCATION AND TRAINING

MONTGOMERY GI BILL – SELECTED RESERVE

WHAT IS THE MONTGOMERY GI BILL – SELECTED RESERVE 

(CHAPTER 1606)?

The Montgomery GI Bill – Selected Reserve is an education program that provides up to 36 months of 

education benefits to members of the Selected Reserve. This includes the Army, Navy, Air Force, 

Marine Corps, and Coast Guard Reserves, as well as the Army National Guard and the Air National 

Guard. 

An eligible reservist may get education benefits while in a program approved for VA training. For 

information about the types of training available, please click on this link VA's WEAMS Institution 

Search Tool to search for approved Education and Job Training Programs. 

WHO IS ELIGIBLE?

You may be considered an eligible reservist or National Guard member if:

• After June 30, 1985, you signed a six-year obligation to serve in the Selected Reserve, AND

• You completed your Initial Active Duty for Training (IADT), AND

• You got your High School Diploma or GED before you completed your IADT, AND

• You are in good standing in a drilling Selected Reserve unit.

Benefits generally end 14 years from the date you become eligible or when you leave the Selected 

Reserves. Your period of eligibility may be extended if you were unable to train because of a servicerelated disability. 

HOW MUCH DOES VA PAY?

The monthly benefit paid to you is based on the type of training. If you are attending school, your 

payment is based on your training time (i.e. full time, half time, etc). For the Educational Assistance 

Allowance, please see current rate tables. 

Disabilities determined by VA to be related to your military service can lead to monthly non-taxable compensation, enrollment in the 

VA health care system, a 10-point hiring preference for federalemployment and other important benefits. Ask your VA 

representative or Veterans Service Organization representative about Disability Compensation, Pension, Health Care, Caregiver

Program, Career Services, Educational Assistance, Home Loan Guaranty, Insurance and/or Dependents and Survivors’ Benefits.
HOW CAN YOU APPLY?

Once you find a program approved for VA training you can apply online.

For more information, call toll-free 1-888-442-4551 (1-888-GI BILL 1) or visit the GI Bill website.

Education Service – February 2015
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 464 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 464

To constitute the majority party's membership on certain committees for 
   the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress, or until their successors are 
                                chosen.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 6, 2020

Mr. McConnell submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To constitute the majority party's membership on certain committees for 
   the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress, or until their successors are 
                                chosen.

    Resolved, That the following shall constitute the majority party's 
membership on the following committees for the One Hundred Sixteenth 
Congress, or until their successors are chosen:
    Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry: Mr. Roberts, Mr. 
McConnell, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Hoeven, Ms. Ernst, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. 
Braun, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Thune, Mrs. Fischer, Mrs. Loeffler.
    Committee on Finance: Mr. Grassley, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Roberts, Mr. 
Enzi, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Thune, Mr. Burr, Mr. Portman, Mr. Toomey, Mr. 
Scott (SC), Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Daines, Mr. Young, Mr. 
Sasse.
    Committee on Foreign Relations: Mr. Risch, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Johnson, 
Mr. Gardner, Mr. Romney, Mr. Graham, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Portman, Mr. 
Paul, Mr. Young, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Perdue.
    Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions: Mr. Alexander, 
Mr. Enzi, Mr. Burr, Mr. Paul, Ms. Collins, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Roberts, 
Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Scott (SC), Mr. Romney, Mr. Braun, Mrs. Loeffler.
    Joint Economic Committee: Mr. Lee, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Portman, Mr. 
Cassidy, Mr. Cruz, Mrs. Loeffler.
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Moran, Mr. Boozman, Mr. 
Cassidy, Mr. Rounds, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Sullivan, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. 
Cramer, Mrs. Loeffler.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 25, 2011.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth Binning, Vice President, Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105-1579:

                    1.                     *Home Federal Bancorp, Inc.,*                     to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Home Federal Bank, both of Nampa, Idaho.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 28, 2011.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2011-7611 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF TREASURER



I, Robert F. Aufenanger, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Excelsior Venture Partners III, LLC;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                               
|-------------------------------
|Date: September 20, 2004       
|                               
|/s/ Robert F. Aufenanger       
|Robert F. Aufenanger, Treasurer



25
! "!#$%!	
&	 '"

( !
&#)*$+!		,!,-	 	.	.-/		0/

!&	 '"( !
&#)*$+!		,!&&-

*&&0#!#-

-1111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111

	0

2	-3#!04#-.

5-!3

+)6


  77668-

668-,9':;;

+0"

<*)""	!"668-

=)&-	-.6-,>;

8-	-.,9+::?:

=>@==?

55++A655

  774 0
#. 

4 0
#.,9'=

+0"( !
&#)*$+!		,!


-*	!3,8	.,B	0,5& C#,(


:>4 *6-,#	>>

	"D,9+::>>

=>@:?>>

Mar 6 2019 /s/ Brian F. Kenney

March 6, 2019

Case 18-13633-BFK Doc 23 Filed 03/06/19 Entered 03/06/19 15:10:15 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
55

77 (A 1111111

 (A 


#

>>8	.';>>

+&D-	,9+::;

=>:::

<!&6#&?>::

	"	!	

".	.)-*--0-7E-#&&!0	

##<!&6#&?>::


  77668-    

668-,+0"


	

( !
&#)*$+!		,!


-*	!38	.B	05& C#

+4 0

#.

:>4 *6-,#	>>

	"D,9+::>>

Case 18-13633-BFK Doc 23 Filed 03/06/19 Entered 03/06/19 15:10:15 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Michael J. Ruane

Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C.(S) 1350, as adopted), I, Michael J. Ruane, Chief Financial Officer of SunGard Data Systems Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that to my knowledge:



1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the Periodic Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Dated: March 14, 2005  
|                       
|/s/ Michael J. Ruane   
|Michael J. Ruane       
|Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SunGard Data Systems Inc. and will be retained by SunGard Data Systems Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 828

 838

 849

 846

 832

 805

 753

 783

 789

 811

 862

 842

 539

 856

 525

 825

 679

 848

 693

 844

 729

 828

 692

 815

 768

 777

 775

 745

 755

 757

 774

 490

 489

 505

 510

 518

 515

 519

 516

 511

 519

 506

 519

 503

 525

 514

 527

 538

 555

 560

 603

 599

 697

 659

 697

 749

 733

 672

 674

 633

 642

 661

 589

 595

 613

 619

 626

 614

 620

 605

 593

 602

 626

 650

 519

 697

 519

 691

 571

 723

 598

 743

 639

 780

 676

 772

 758

 749

 717

 716

 689

 695

 719

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 16, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 380

 384

 395

 399

 403

 395

 399

 390

 382

 388

 403

 418

 337

 447

 337

 443

 369

 463

 386

 475

 411

 498

 434

 493

 484

 479

 459

 458

 442

 446

 460

TOTAL 20,323

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
#### William J. English, Respondent, v. Steeplechase Park Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Carr and Stapleton, JJ., concurred; Thomas and Rich, JJ., dissented.