alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 601

 573

 675

 662

 685

 662

 587

 675

 644

 635

 617

 654

 651

 650

 588

 578

 591

 625

 620

 659

 656

 647

 640

 664

 655

 650

 641

 647

 650

 651

 657

 547

 556

 565

 576

 635

 564

 540

 565

 557

 609

 590

 600

 599

 589

 562

 561

 565

 580

 606

 614

 619

 620

 611

 614

 608

 603

 595

 619

 613

 607

 619

 562

 565

 626

 611

 672

 600

 565

 631

 597

 617

 606

 630

 623

 610

 571

 568

 582

 611

 612

 646

 634

 640

 620

 648

 627

 632

 617

 630

 631

 632

 638

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 3, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 363

 365

 403

 394

 431

 387

 365

 406

 385

 397

 391

 405

 401

 393

 369

 367

 376

 394

 394

 415

 408

 412

 399

 416

 403

 407

 397

 405

 406

 407

 410

TOTAL 19,054

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
§ 370.44 What reporting requirement applies to each designated agency? In addition to the program and fiscal reporting requirements in 34 CFR 76.720 and 2 CFR 200.327 ** that are applicable to this program, each designated agency shall submit to the Secretary, no later than 90 days after the end of each fiscal year, an annual report on the operation of its CAP during the previous year, including a summary of the work done and the uniform statistical tabulation of all cases handled by the program. The annual report must contain information on— ( a ) The number of requests received by the designated agency for information on services and benefits under the Act and title I of the ADA;
( b ) The number of referrals to other agencies made by the designated agency and the reason or reasons for those referrals;
( c ) The number of requests for advocacy services received by the designated agency from clients or client-applicants;
( d ) The number of requests for advocacy services from clients or client-applicants that the designated agency was unable to serve;
( e ) The reasons that the designated agency was unable to serve all of the requests for advocacy services from clients or client-applicants; and
( f ) Any other information that the Secretary may require.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0520) (Authority: Sections 12(c) and 112(g)(4) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 732(g)(4))
Summary: No Evidence of Impropriety by an FWS Manager 

Report Date: August 11, 2020 Report Number: 19-0206 

The OIG investigated allegations that a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) manager accepted 

gifts from prohibited sources, awarded contracts to personal friends, directed improper credit 

card purchases, and violated travel regulations. 

We did not find evidence that the manager’s actions violated ethics, procurement, or travel 

regulations as alleged. 

This is a summary of an investigative report we issued to the FWS Director. 

Office of Investigations | Office of Inspector General | U.S. Department of the Interior | Washington, DC
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 513 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal certain rules related 

to the determination of unrelated business taxable income. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 11, 2019 

Mr. CONAWAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

certain rules related to the determination of unrelated 

business taxable income. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nonprofits Support 

5 Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 513 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT THAT UNRELATED BUSI2 NESS TAXABLE INCOME BE COMPUTED SEPA3 RATELY FOR EACH TRADE OR BUSINESS AC4 TIVITY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 512(a) of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking paragraph 

7 (6). 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section shall take effect as if included in section 

10 13702 of Public Law 115–97. 

11 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF INCREASE OF UNRELATED BUSINESS 

12 TAXABLE INCOME BY CERTAIN DISALLOWED 

13 FRINGE BENEFITS. 

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 512(a) of the Internal 

15 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking paragraph 

16 (7). 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

18 this section shall take effect as if included in section 

19 13703 of Public Law 115–97. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00366-CR

Roger Eugene Fain

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 372nd District Court

of Tarrant County (1023944D)

December 4, 2014

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in the trial court’s order. It is ordered that the order of the trial 

court is affirmed in part and reversed in part. We affirm the trial court’s order as 

to the blood on the Bic pen and in the closet. We reverse the trial court’s order 

as to the hairs in Donahew’s hands, the pubic hair, blood on the bathroom faucet, 

Donahew’s fingernail clippings, male DNA discovered on the bra and shirt 

Donahew wore on the day of her death, and the knife. We remand this case to 

the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By __/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot_____________

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIDDK Seeding R24 Applications on Collaborative Team Science in Diabetes.                    

*Date:*                         May 10, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         2 p.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Najma Begum, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 749, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-8894,                         *begumn@niddk.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 25, 2011.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-7639 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 474

 466

 497

 479

 516

 418

 444

 486

 483

 498

 545

 615

 445

 425

 395

 449

 381

 404

 394

 420

 419

 415

 416

 454

 493

 488

 459

 470

 485

 488

 486

 424

 427

 438

 365

 341

 328

 317

 304

 303

 306

 299

 296

 310

 318

 312

 317

 330

 336

 325

 340

 370

 348

 364

 382

 378

 379

 391

 400

 421

 405

 420

 446

 452

 462

 418

 386

 355

 346

 344

 338

 342

 350

 357

 345

 343

 341

 353

 356

 358

 356

 366

 384

 381

 388

 408

 424

 427

 426

 447

 453

 454

 465

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 25, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 292

 295

 302

 274

 255

 235

 230

 229

 225

 227

 232

 237

 229

 228

 227

 234

 236

 237

 236

 242

 253

 251

 256

 268

 278

 280

 279

 292

 296

 297

 303

TOTAL 12,071

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
I am writing to request an extension of Exemption No. 10494 issued to Caroline Brantley from certain 

requirements of § 121.311(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). This exemption 

allowed Caroline to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system 

(CARES, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a 

United States (U.S.) aircraft. In addition, any air carrier operating under part 121 while Caroline was 

aboard its aircraft was also granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent necessary to 

allow Caroline to use an FAA-approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft.

My daughter , Caroline, is currently 13 years old, weighs 53 pounds, and is 55 inches tall. Caroline’s

physical condition is known as static encephalopathy. As a result of her physical condition, she continues 

to need the support and security provided by an FAA-approved CRS, but because of her weight is 

incapable of compliance with the regulation. I am also submitting the following contact 

information: Marta Brantley (mother) 3981 E. Indigo Bay Court Gilbert, AZ 85234.

The original exemption allowed Caroline Brantley to occupy an FAA-approved CRS (CARES, 

manufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), even though she exceeded the manufacturer’s weight limits. This 

ensured a high level of safety for Caroline and a high level of safety for the other passengers and crew 

on the airplane. In fact, in Caroline’s case, safety is greatly enhanced by the extra support and security 

that the FAA-approved CRS provides during the entire flight.

Enhancing safety for Caroline is in the public interest. In addition, the public interest is also served by 

the fact that the use of this FAA-approved CRS allows her to use commercial air transportation. Without 

the support and security of the FAA-approved CRS, she would be unable to fly commercially. Since the 

original exemption was issued, there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public 

interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

If it is necessary to put a summary in the Federal Register, I submit the following:

This is a request for an extension of an exemption from FAR 121.311 (b) to the extent required for an 

individual to use an FAA-Approved Child Restraint System (CRS) on an aircraft, even though the 

individual exceeds the weight limits for the CRS. Due to physical challenges, without the support and 

security of this FAA-approved CRS, this individual would be unable to fly. We request that this individual 

be allowed to occupy an FAA-approved CRS (CARES, manufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), even though the 

individual exceeds the manufacturer’s weight limits of 44 pounds. In this case, the safety of this individual 

is greatly enhanced by the extra support and security that the FAA-approved CRS will provide for this 

individual during the flight.

Thank you for your consideration of this request.
#### The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, v. The City of Buffalo and George M. Zimmerman, as Comptroller, etc., Respondents.

Judgment so far as appealed from affirmed, with costs. A11 concurred.
#### Yonkers Savings Bank, Respondent, v. Anna M. Donovan, Appellant.

No opinion. Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF SUNGARD DATA SYSTEMS INC. AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997
AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1997, BOTH INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10-K OF SUNGARD DATA SYSTEMS, INC. FOR THE
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          64,938
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  220,677
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,895
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               310,079
<PP&E>                                         319,585
<DEPRECIATION>                                 199,589
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 786,334
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          224,523
<BONDS>                                          2,765
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           889
<OTHER-SE>                                     558,157
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   862,151
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               862,151
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  538,664<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,808<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,584
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                133,704
<INCOME-TAX>                                    56,158
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             77,546
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    77,546
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.89<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.87<F3>
<FN>
<F1>EXCLUDES SELLING, MARKETING AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, AND PURCHASED IN-
PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AND MERGER COSTS.
<F2>PURCHASED IN-PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS AND MERGER COSTS.
<F3>INCLUDES PURCHASED IN-PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AND MERGER COSTS
TOTALING $0.10 PER SHARE. ALSO, REFLECTS SEPTEMBER 1997 TWO-FOR-ONE STOCK
SPLIT.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Case 19-34574-KRH Doc 272 Filed 11/29/19 Entered 12/03/19 14:05:15 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
§ 661.20 What must an application include? An institution that applies for a grant under this program shall include the following in its application: ( a ) ( 1 ) A copy of the agreement between the applicant and the other party or parties described in § 661.2 for the purpose of carrying out the activities for which the applicant seeks assistance.
( 2 ) The agreement must be signed by all parties and it must describe the manner in which the business enterprise, trade association, or organization will assist in carrying out the activities proposed in the application.
( b ) An assurance that the applicant will use the funds to supplement and not to supplant activities conducted by the applicant.
( c ) An assurance that, where applicable, the activities funded by the grant will reflect diverse perspectives and a wide range of views on world regions and international affairs.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1130a)
[49 FR 24362, June 12, 1984, as amended at 74 FR 35074, July 17, 2009]
## NO. 12-08-00451-CR NO. 12-08-00452-CR NO. 12-08-00453-CR IN THE COUR T OF APP EALS TWELFTH COURT OF APP EALS D ISTR ICT

TYLER, TEXA S

BRA NDON MO

NTREL STRE

ET, § APPEALS FROM THE 114TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRI CT COURT OF TH E ST ATEOFTEX

AS, APP ELL EE § SMI TH CO UN TY

, T EXAS MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION PER CU RIAM Appellant plea ded guil ty to two char ges of manufa cture or delivery of a controlled substanc e and one c harge of possession of more than four ounc es but less than five pounds of marijuana . The trial court se ntence d Appellant to imprisonment for two year s on the first two cha rges and forty yea

rs on the third. We have rec eived the trial court’s certification showing that Appellant waived his right to appea l. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d). The certification is signed by Appellant and his c ounsel and inc lud e s th e no tic e , a s r e qu ir e d b y r ule 25 .2 , th a t Ap pe llant h a s b e e n in fo rm e d o f h is righ ts conce rning an appea l, a s well as any right to f ile a pro se petition for discr etionary r eview. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d). Ac cordingly, these a ppeals a re dismiss ed

for want of jurisdiction. Opinion delivere d November 19, 2008. P an el consi s t ed of

W ort hen, C. J. , G r i

f f i t h, J. , and H oyl e, J.

(DO N OT PUBLISH)
Jefferson 

County 

Lewis & Clark U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

County Bureau of Land Management 

Malta
 

Field Office
 

Missoula 

Field Office 

Lewistown Butte Field Office Field Office
 

Miles City Helena
 

Butte Field Office
 Draft RMP/EIS 

Field

Office
 Billings 

Field Office 

Dillon Map 38: Visual Resource

Field Office Management (VRM) Designations 

Broadwater Under Alternative C 

Miles County 0 400 

Townsend 

Anaconda 

Deer Lodge 

Butte County 

Silver Bow
 

County
 

Gallatin 

County 

Livingston Bozeman 

City
 Interstate
 US Route
 MT Route
 Park 

I - Class 1 County 

II -- Class 2 III - Class 3 

IV - Class 4 

County Boundary 

Field Office Boundary 

Map shows proposed Visual Resource Management Class designations under Alternative C. This alternative proposes: 31,500 acres in Class I which allows no visible change, 62,300 acres in Class II which allows visible change that does not attract attention, 151,700 acres in Class III which allows change that attracts attention, but does not dominate, Miles and 56,500 acres in Class IV which allows change that is dominant 0 40 Map Scale 1:510,000 but minimized or mitigated as much as possible. 

Map generated by the Butte Field Office in February 2007 

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection 

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data for individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.
---

CERTIFICATION OF 
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Lam, President and Chief Executive Officer of Balsam
  Ventures, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
        and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                  



| | By:    | /s/ David Lam                        
| | ------ | -------------------------------------
| |        |                                      
| | Name:  | David Lam                            
| |        |                                      
| | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer
| |        |                                      
| | Date:  | November 18, 2004                    

A signed original of this written statement required by
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
  and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which
  it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
  the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
  before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation
  language contained in such filing.

---
#### § 602.39 Severability.

If any provision of this subpart or its application to any person, act, or practice is held invalid, the remainder of the subpart or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or practice shall not be affected thereby.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1099b)

[84 FR 58931, Nov. 1, 2019]
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean TDS

1 398 346 380 251

2 403 351 380 251

3 405 356 380 251

4 419 368 387 255

5 416 383 393 259

6 407 392 395 260

7 422 394 401 264

8 419 396 403 265

9 417 396 408 268

10 439 403 413 271

11 435 406 417 274

12 424 411 416 273

13 423 410 417 274

14 422 402 413 271

15 418 397 409 269

16 414 385 400 263

17 412 378 395 260

18 418 378 393 259

19 418 375 394 259

20 429 379 398 262

21 428 381 399 263

22 440 382 406 267

23 453 385 414 272

24 458 393 418 274

25 450 396 415 272

26 421 390 400 263

27 400 380 390 257

28 417 384 397 261

29 434 385 403 265

30 457 390 414 272

31 473 393 423 277

Total 12471

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Headworks

Period: May 2022 Run Date: 11/22/2022