Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RIN 0648-XA146
 AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
 ACTION: Notice of Scoping Meetings.
 SUMMARY: The Caribbean Fishery Management Council will hold scoping meetings to obtain input from fishers, the general public, and the local agencies representatives on the Options Paper for the Comprehensive Annual Catch Limit (ACL) Amendment for the U.S. Caribbean including Amendment 6 to the Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands; Amendment 2 to the Fishery Management Plan for Corals and Reef Associated Plants and Invertebrates of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands; Amendment 5 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Spiny Lobster Fishery of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands; Amendment 3 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Queen Conch Fishery of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands
 DATES AND ADDRESSES: The scoping meetings will be held on the following dates and locations: For Puerto Rico, February 7, 2011, DoubleTree by Hilton San Juan, De Diego Avenue, San Juan, Puerto Rico February 9, 2011, Mayagüez Holiday Inn, 2701 Hostos Avenue, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico February 10, 2011, Holiday Inn Ponce & Tropical Casino, 3315 Ponce By Pass, Ponce, Puerto Rico For the U.S. Virgin Islands, February 16, 2011, The Buccaneer Hotel, Estate Shoys, Christiansted, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. February 17, 2011, Holiday Inn (Windward Passage Hotel) Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands All meetings will be held from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caribbean Fishery Management Council, 268 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, Suite 1108, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00918-1920, telephone (787) 766-5926.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Caribbean Fishery Management Council will hold Scoping meetings to receive public input on the following management options. The complete Options Paper is available at: 
                    *http://caribbeanfmc.com/​pdfs/​2011%20ACL%20Amendment%20Options%20Paper%20December%2022%202010.pdf:* Management Options Action 1. Management Reference Points Action 1a: Establish a year sequence for determining average annual landings that can be applied to each island group for both the commercial and recreational sectors. Option 1: No action. Retain current management reference points or proxies for species/species groups within the reef fish, queen conch, lobster, and corals FMUs. Option 2: Establish a year sequence for determining average annual landings for each species or species group within Puerto Rico. Sub-option A: Establish a start year for the year sequence. Sub-sub-option i: Use 1983 as the start date for determining average annual landings for each species or species group within Puerto Rico. Sub-sub-option ii: Use 1998 as the start date for determining average annual landings for each species or species group within Puerto Rico. Sub-sub-option iii: Use 1999 as the start date for determining average annual landings for each species or species group within Puerto Rico. Sub-sub-option iv: Use 2000 as the start date for determining average annual landings for each species or species group within Puerto Rico. Sub-sub-option v: Use 2003 as the start date for determining average annual landings for each species or species group within Puerto Rico. Sub-sub-option vi: Use 2004 as the start date for determining average annual landings for each species or species group within Puerto Rico. Sub-option B: Establish an end year for the year sequence. Sub-sub-option i: Use 2005 as the end date for determining average annual landings for each species or species group within Puerto Rico. Sub-sub-option ii: Use 2007 as the end date for determining average annual landings for each species or species group within Puerto Rico. Sub-sub-option iii: Use 2008 as the end date for determining average annual landings for each species or species group within Puerto Rico. Option 3: Establish a year sequence for determining average annual landings for each species or species group within St. Thomas and St. John. Sub-option A: Establish a start year for the year sequence.
                    ( print page 2666) Sub-sub-option i: Use 2000 as the start date for determining average annual landings for each species or species group within St. Thomas and St. John. Sub-sub-option ii: Use 2003 as the start date for determining average annual landings for each species or species group within St. Thomas and St. John. Sub-option B: Establish an end year for the year sequence. Sub-sub-option i: Use 2005 as the end date for determining average annual landings for each species or species group within St. Thomas and St. John. Sub-sub-option ii: Use 2007 as the end date for determining average annual landings for each species or species group within St. Thomas and St. John. Option 4: Establish a year sequence for determining average annual landings for each species or species group within St. Croix. Sub-option A: Establish a start year for the year sequence. Sub-sub-option i: Use 1998 as the start date for determining average annual landings for each species or species group within St. Croix. Sub-sub-option ii: Use 1999 as the start date for determining average annual landings for each species or species group within St. Croix. Sub-sub-option iii: Use 2000 as the start date for determining average annual landings for each species or species group within St. Croix. Sub-sub-option iv: Use 2003 as the start date for determining average annual landings for each species or species group within St. Croix. Sub-option B: Establish an end year for the year sequence. Sub-sub-option i: Use 2005 as the end date for determining average annual landings for each species or species group within St. Croix. Sub-sub-option ii: Use 2007 as the end date for determining average annual landings for each species or species group within St. Croix. Action 1b. Establish MSY proxy. The MSA requires that FMPs specify a number of reference points for managed fish stocks, including: Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY)—The greatest amount or yield that can be sustainably harvested under prevailing environmental conditions.
                Overfishing Threshold—The maximum rate of fishing a stock can withstand (MFMT) or maximum yield a stock can produce (OFL), annually, while still providing MSY on a continuing basis.
                Overfished Threshold (MSST)—The biomass level below which a stock would not be capable of producing MSY.
                Annual Catch Limit (ACL)—The annual level to which catch is limited in order to prevent overfishing from occurring.
                Optimum Yield (OY)—The amount or yield that provides the greatest overall benefit to the Nation, taking into account food production, recreational opportunities and the protection of marine ecosystems. Together, these parameters are intended to provide the means to measure the status and performance of fisheries relative to established goals. Available data in the U.S. Caribbean are not sufficient to support direct estimation of MSY and other key parameters. In such cases, the National Standard 1 (NS1) guidelines direct regional fishery management councils to adopt other measures of productive capacity, including long-term average catch, which can serve as reasonable proxies. Option 1: No action. Retain current management reference points or proxies for species/species groups. Discussion: This alternative would retain the present MSY proxy, OY, and overfishing threshold definitions specified in the Comprehensive SFA Amendment for species/species groups. These definitions are detailed in Table 6. The current MSY proxy is based on average catch (C) and on estimates of where stock biomass and fishing mortality rates are in relation to MSY levels during the period over which catches are averaged. The overfishing threshold (MFMT) is defined as a rate of fishing which exceeds that which would produce MSY. And OY is defined as the amount of fish produced by fishing at a rate equal to 75% of that which would produce MSY. The numerical values associated with these parameters are provided in Table 6. Table 6—Current MSY Proxy, OY and Overfishing Threshold Definitions for Species/Species Groups
Reference point
Status quo definitionMaximum Sustainable Yield
MSY proxy = C/[(FCURR
                            /FMSY) × (BCURR
                            /BMSY)]; where C is calculated based on commercial landings for the years 1997-2001 for Puerto Rico and 1994-2002 for the USVI, and on recreational landings for the years 2000-2001.Overfishing Threshold
MFMT = FMSY.Optimum Yield
OY = average yield associated with fishing on a continuing basis at FOY; where FOY
                             = 0.75FMSY.
 The Comprehensive SFA Amendment in which these reference points were established pre-dated the MSRA provisions requiring FMPs to specify ACLs; consequently, the Comprehensive SFA Amendment did not explicitly specify this parameter for managed species/species groups. However, the ABC estimates derived from the Council's MSY control rule could be considered to represent the ACLs if no additional action were taken to revise management reference points in this amendment. Option 2: Redefine management reference points or proxies based on the time series of catch data that is considered to be consistently reliable across all islands as defined in Action 1a. Discussion: Option 2 would define aggregate management reference points or proxies based on what the Council considers to be the longest time series of catch data that is consistently reliable across all islands. Specific definitions are detailed in Table 7. The MSY proxy specified by Option 2 would equate to average catch, calculated using commercial landings data and recreational landings data defined in Action 1a. Commercial data would be derived from trip ticket reports collected by the state governments. Recreational data would be derived from the MRFSS. The overfishing threshold (OFL) would be defined as the amount of catch corresponding to the MSY proxy, and overfishing would be determined to occur if annual catches exceeded the overfishing threshold (Option 2(a)) or if annual catches exceeded the overfishing threshold and scientists (in consultation with managers) attributed the overage to increased catches versus improved data collection and monitoring (Option 2(b)).
                    ( print page 2667) Table 7—Management Reference Points or Proxies Proposed Under Alternative 2
Reference point
Option 2Maximum Sustainable Yield
MSY proxy = average annual commercial catch selected by Council in Action 1a.Overfishing Threshold:Option 2(a)
OFL = MSY proxy; overfishing occurs when annual catches exceed the OFL.Option 2(b)
OFL = MSY proxy; overfishing occurs when annual catches exceed the OFL, unless NMFS' Southeast Fisheries Science Center (in consultation with the Caribbean Fishery Management Council and its Scientific and Statistical Committee) determines the overage occurred because data collection/monitoring improved, rather than because catches actually increased.Optimum Yield/Annual Catch Limit:Option 2(c)
OY = ACL = OFL.Option 2(d)
OY = ACL = OFL × (0.85).Option 2(e)
OY = ACL = OFL × (0.75).Option 2(f)
OY = ACL = OFL × (0.50).Option 2(g)
OY = ACL = ABC specified by Scientific and Statistical Committee.Option 2(h)
OY = ACL = 0.
 The OY and ACL would be equal values, and the same socioeconomic and ecological tradeoffs would be considered in the determination of where to set both of these parameters. Most of the alternative ACL definitions considered here are more restrictive than the current OY definition and would prevent the fishery from achieving OY as currently defined. ACL (= OY) Options 2(c) through 2(f) would set those parameters equal to some proportion (100-50%) of the OFL to take into account uncertainty, ecological factors, and other concerns. Option 2(g) would set the ACL (= OY) equal to the ABC recommended by the Council's Scientific and Statistical Committee. Option 2(h) would set the ACL (= OY) equal to zero for surgeonfish. Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) The MSY proxy defined by no action Option 1 averages catches over the longest time period during which data were considered to be relatively stable at the time the Council approved the Comprehensive SFA Amendment. Because the Council had fewer years of catch data to work with at that time, that proxy incorporated Puerto Rico and USVI catch data prior to 1999. The MSY proxies evaluated in Option 2 does not use pre-1999 data in average catch calculations because those data were collected by gear type rather than by family group. The Council instead prefers to use data from more recent years, when the data were collected by family group and therefore provide a relatively consistent baseline among all of the islands. Additionally, in contrast to the no action Option 1, Option 2 does not attempt to incorporate information on recreational catches in the USVI because the MRFSS does not provide this information and no alternative data are available to reliably estimate these landings. As a result, the MSYs specified by these alternative proxies are expected to be underestimated to some unknown degree. In general, underestimating MSY can result in foregone yield, whereas overestimating MSY can lead to overfishing. Overfishing Threshold (MFMT/OFL) The overfishing threshold defined by Option 1 is a maximum fishing mortality threshold (MFMT) equal to the fishing mortality rate at MSY. Because this fishing mortality rate is unknown for U.S. Caribbean species, the Comprehensive SFA Amendment adopted natural mortality rate as a proxy for this parameter. However, data are insufficient to evaluate the sustainability of current fishing mortality rates relative to this proxy and make a determination as to whether overfishing is or is not occurring. To remedy this, Option 2 proposes to specify a catch-based, rather than fishing mortality-based, overfishing threshold, called the overfishing limit (OFL). Annual catches would be evaluated relative to the OFL to determine whether overfishing is or is not occurring. This approach is consistent with the NS1 guidelines, which provide fishery managers the flexibility to determine if overfishing occurs based on either fishing mortality rates or actual annual catch. Option 2 would essentially maintain the same relationship as the no action alternative between the overfishing threshold and MSY. MSY represents the maximum yield a species complex can provide in the long term, while OFL estimates the amount of annual catch above which overfishing is occurring. In theory, the annual OFL would vary above and below the MSY level depending on fluctuations in stock size. Since both MSY and OFL are related to the highest fishing mortality rate that will not result in overfishing, the long-term average of OFLs would be expected to equate to MSY, provided that stock abundance is high enough to support MSY. But, in practice, the annual OFL proposed in Option 2 would remain constant at the MSY level until stock biomass can be estimated. Sub-option (a) would result in an automatic overfishing determination if annual catch exceeded the OFL in any given year, whereas Option (b) would provide scientists (in consultation with managers) the flexibility to evaluate the cause of the reported catch increase prior to making a determination that a species complex is undergoing overfishing. Specifically, they would consider whether the reported increase represents an actual increase in landings or just improved data collection and monitoring. The intent of this sub-option is to eliminate any incentive for fishermen to under-report or misreport catches to avoid exceeding ACLs and triggering associated AMs. Optimum Yield (OY) and Annual Catch Limits (ACLs) The current OY defined by no action Option 1 is derived from the technical guidance provided by Restrepo 
                    *et al.*
                     (1998), which recommends the target fishing mortality rate be set equal to the average yield available on a continuing basis from fishing at 75% of the fishing mortality rate that would produce MSY. The authors of that guidance indicate that fishing at this level adds precaution and maintains stocks at higher biomass levels, while sacrificing only a small amount (~ 6.25%) of catch. Because data are insufficient to estimate the fishing mortality rate that would produce MSY, the Comprehensive SFA Amendment estimated the OY of each species/species group to equal 93.75% of MSY. While the no action Option 1 does not explicitly define ACLs for the target 
                    ( print page 2668)
                    species, the ABC estimates specified by the Council's MSY control rule could be considered to represent the ACLs of these species/species groups if no additional action were taken through this amendment to revise management reference points. However, these ABC values are very uncertain as they were calculated using natural mortality rate as a proxy for the fishing mortality rate that would produce MSY and informed judgment regarding stock biomass. And, because these values were set well below MSY values to address SFA Working Group determinations regarding overfishing, they would prevent the fishery from achieving OY; even though recent landings data indicate that, in most cases, management controls appear to have effectively reduced catch rates below the overfishing threshold. To remedy this, Option 2 would set the OY and ACL as equal values, requiring the Council to consider the socioeconomic and ecological components of OY when determining how far ACLs should be reduced below the overfishing threshold to account for scientific uncertainty in estimating the OFL and management uncertainty in effectively constraining harvest over time. This approach leads to OY estimates for the target species that are below those estimated in the Comprehensive SFA Amendment, regardless of the OY (= ACL) alternative selected. In contrast, most of the OY alternatives would result in larger OY estimates for the grouper and parrotfish complexes relative to the no action alternative. Action 1c. Allocation of ACLs among island groups. Option 1: No Action. Maintain U.S. Caribbean-wide reference points. 
 
  
 
 Action 2: Management of Aquarium Trade Species Option 1: No action. Do not re-evaluate and revise management of aquarium trade species. Option 2: Consolidate all aquarium trade species listed in the Fishery Management Plan for Corals and Reef Associated Plants and Invertebrates of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands and Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands into a single Fishery Management Plan. Sub-option A: Move all aquarium trade species listed in the Fishery Management Plan for Corals and Reef Associated Plants and Invertebrates of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands into the Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Sub-option B: Move all of the aquarium trade species listed in the Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands into the Fishery Management Plan for Corals and Reef Associated Plants and Invertebrates of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Sub-option C: Move all of the aquarium trade species listed in both the Fishery Management Plan for Corals and Reef Associated Plants and Invertebrates of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and in the Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, into a separate Fishery Management Plan specific to aquarium trade species. Option 3: Remove aquarium trade species from both the Fishery Management Plan for Corals and Reef Associated Plants and Invertebrates of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands and the Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Sub-option A: Remove all aquarium trade species from the Fishery Management Plan for Corals and Reef Associated Plants and Invertebrates of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands and from the Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands and no longer track their landings. Sub-option B: Move all aquarium trade species listed in the Fishery Management Plan for Corals and Reef Associated Plants and Invertebrates of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands and the Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands into the `data collection only' category. Sub-option C: Move only those aquarium trade species listed in either the Fishery Management Plan for Corals and Reef Associated Plants and Invertebrates of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands or the Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and for which landings data are available during the year sequence chosen in Action 1 above, into the `data collection only' category. Remove all remaining aquarium trade species from either the Fishery Management Plan for Corals and Reef Associated Plants and Invertebrates of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands or the Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands and no longer track their landings. Option 4: Transfer management authority, for all aquarium trade species listed in either the Fishery Management Plan for Corals and Reef Associated Plants and Invertebrates of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands or the Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, to the jurisdiction of the appropriate commonwealth or territory as defined by Action 3(c) of Amendment 2 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Queen Conch Fishery of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands and Amendment 5 to the Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Table 8. List of all species included in the Aquarium Trade category in both the Reef Fish and Coral FMPs. Table contents are extracted from Table 8 of the Comprehensive Amendment to the Fishery Management Plans (FMPs) of the U.S. Caribbean to Address Required Provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (a.k.a. the Comprehensive Sustainable Fisheries Act Amendment). Reef Fish FMP *Clepticus parrae,*
                     Creole wrasse *Halichoeres garnoti,*
                     Yellowhead wrasse *Halichoeres cyanocephalus,*
                     Yellowcheek wrasse *Halichoeres maculipinna,*
                     Clown wrasse *Thalassoma bifasciatum,*
                     Bluehead wrasse *Liopropoma rubre,*
                     Swissguard basslet *Gramma loreto,*
                     Royal gramma *Microspathodon chrysurus,*
                     Yellowtail damselfish *Stegastes adustus,*
                     Dusky damselfish *Stegastes partitus,*
                     Bicolor damselfish *Stegastes planifrons,*
                     Threespot damselfish *Stegastes leucostictus,*
                     Beaugregory *Chaetodon capistratus,*
                     Foureye butterflyfish *Chaetodon aculeatus,*
                     Longsnout butterflyfish *Chaetodon ocellatus,*
                     Spotfin butterflyfish *Chaetodon*
                     striatus, Banded butterflyfish *Serranus baldwini,*
                     Lantern bass *Serranus annularis,*
                     Orangeback bass *Serranus tabacarius,*
                     Tobaccofish *Serranus tigrinus,*
                     Harlequin bass *Serranus tortugarum,*
                     Chalk bass *Opistognathus aurifrons,*
                     Yellowhead jawfish *Opistognathus whitehursti,*
                     Dusky jawfish *Xyrichtys novacula,*
                     Pearly razorfish *Xyrichtys splendens,*
                     Green razorfish *Echidna catenata,*
                     Chain moray *Gymnothorax funebris,*
                     Green moray Gymnothorax 
                    *miliaris,*
                     Goldentail moray *Elacatinus oceanops,*
                     Neon goby *Priolepis hipoliti,*
                     Rusty goby *Equetus lanceolatus,*
                     Jackknife-fish *Equetus punctatus,*
                     Spotted drum *Chromis cyanea,*
                     Blue chromis *Chromis insolata,*
                     Sunshinefish *Abudefduf**saxatilis,*
                     Sergeant major *Astrapogon stellatus,*
                     Conchfish *Apogon maculatua,*
                     Flamefish *Amblycirrhitus pinos,*
                     Redspotted hawkfish *Antennarius*
                     spp., Frogfish *Bothus lunatus,*
                     Peacock flounder Chaetodipterus 
                    *faber,*
                     Atlantic spadefish *Canthigaster rostrata,*
                     Sharpnose puffer *Centropyge argi,*
                     Cherubfish *Diodon*
                     hystrix, Porcupinefish *Dactylopterus volitans,*
                     Flying gurnard *Heteropriacanthus cruentatus,*
                     Glasseye snapper *Hypoplectrus unicolor,*
                     Butter hamlet *Holocanthus tricolor,*
                     Rock beauty *Myrichthys ocellatus,*
                     Goldspotted eel *Ophioblennius macclurei,*
                     Redlip blenny Pareques 
                    *acuminatus,*
                     High-hat *Rypticus saponaceus,*
                     Greater sopafish *Synodus intermedius,*
                     Sand diver *Symphurus diomedianus,*
                     Caribbean tonguefish Family Syngnathidae, Pipefishes and Seahorses Family Ogcocephalidae, Batfish Family Scorpaenidae, Scorpionfish Table 8 (continued). List of all species included in the Aquarium Trade category in both the Reef Fish and Coral FMPs. Table contents are extracted from Table 8 of the Comprehensive Amendment to the Fishery Management Plans (FMPs) of the U.S. Caribbean to Address Required Provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (a.k.a. the Comprehensive Sustainable Fisheries Act Amendment). Coral FMP *Aphimedon compressa,*
                     Erect rope sponge *Astrophyton muricatum,*
                     Giant basket star
                    ( print page 2671) Alpheaus 
                    *armatus,*
                     Snapping shrimp *Aiptasia tagetes,*
                     Pale anemone *Astropecten*
                     spp., Sand stars *Analcidometra armata,*
                     Swimming crinoid Bartholomea 
                    *annulata,*
                     Corkscrew anemone *Cynachirella alloclada,*
                     sponge (no common name) *Condylactis*
                     gigantea, Giant pink-tipped anemone Cyphoma 
                    *gibbosum,*
                     Flamingo tongue *Chondrilla nucula,*
                     Chicken liver sponge *Diadema antillarum,*
                     Long-spined urchin *Davidaster*
                     spp., Crinoids *Discosoma*
                     spp., False coral *Echinometra*
                     spp., Purple urchin *Eucidaris tribuloides,*
                     Pencil urchin *Gonodactylus*
                     (
                    *Neogonodactylus*) spp., Smashing mantis shrimp Geodia 
                    *neptuni,*
                     Potato sponge Haliclona sp., Finger sponge *Holothuria*
                     spp., Sea cucumbers *Hereractis lucida,*
                     Knobby anemone *Lima*
                     spp., Fileclams *Lima scabra,*
                     Rough fileclam *Lytechinus*
                     spp., Pin cushion urchin *Lysmata*
                     spp., Peppermint shrimp *Linckia guildingii,*
                     Common comet star *Lysiosquilla*
                     spp., Spearing mantis shrimp *Lebrunia*
                     spp., Staghorn anemone *Mithrax*
                     spp., Clinging crabs *Mithrax cinctimanus,*
                     Banded clinging crab *Mithrax sculptus,*
                     Green clinging crab *Myriastra*
                     sp., sponge (no common name) *Niphates digitalis,*
                     Pink vase sponge Niphates 
                    *erecta,*
                     Lavender rope sponge *Nemaster*
                     spp., Crinoids *Ophiocoma*
                     spp., Brittlestars *Ophioderma*
                     spp., Brittlestars *Ophioderma*
                     rubicundum, Ruby brittlestar *Oreaster reticulatus,*
                     Cushion sea star *Ophidiaster guildingii,*
                     Comet star *Oliva reticularis,*
                     Netted olive *Octopus*
                     spp. (except the Common octopus, 
                    *O. vulgaris*) *Paguristes*
                     spp., Hermit crabs *Paguristes cadenati,*
                     Red reef hermit crab *Percnon gibbesi,*
                     Nimble spray crab *Periclimenes*
                     spp., Cleaner shrimp *Ricordia florida,*
                     Florida false coral *Stichodactyla helianthus,*
                     Sun anemone *Spirobranchus giganteus,*
                     Christmas tree worm *Sabellastarte magnifica,*
                     Magnificent duster *Sabellastarte*
                     spp., Tube worms *Stenopus scutellatus,*
                     Golden shrimp *Stenopus hispidus,*
                     Banded shrimp *Stenorhynchus seticornis,*
                     Yellowline arrow crab *Spondylus americanus,*
                     Atlantic thorny oyster *Spinosella plicifera,*
                     Iridescent tube sponge Spinosella 
                    *vaginalis,*
                     Lavendar tube sponge *Tripneustes ventricosus,*
                     Sea egg urchin *Thor amboinensis,*
                     Anemone shrimp *Tectitethya*
                     (
                    *Tethya*) 
                    *crypta,*
                     sponge (no common name) Subphylum Urochordata, Tunicates *Tridachia crispata,*
                     Lettuce sea slug *Zoanthus*
                     spp., Sea mat Action 3. Recreational fishery management. Action 3a. Separation of recreational and commercial sectors. Option 1: No action. Do not specify sector-specific annual catch limits. Option 2: Specify separate commercial and recreational annual catch limits based on the preferred management reference point time series. Action 3b. Recreational Bag Limits Option 1: No action. Do not establish bag limit restrictions on recreational harvest. Option 2: Specify a 5-fish aggregate bag limit per person (would not apply to a fisherman who has a valid commercial fishing license issued by Puerto Rico or the USVI). Option 3: Specify a 2-fish aggregate bag limit per person (would not apply to a fisherman who has a valid commercial fishing license issued by Puerto Rico or the USVI). Option 4: Establish a 0-fish aggregate bag limit per person (would not apply to a fisherman who has a valid commercial fishing license issued by Puerto Rico or the USVI) for species in the surgeonfish FMU. Option 5: Establish an aggregate bag limit of: 10 per fisher including not more than two surgeonfish per fisher or six surgeonfish per boat, and 30 aggregate fish per boat on a fishing day (would not apply to a fisherman who has a valid commercial fishing license issued by Puerto Rico or the USVI). Option 6: Establish an aggregate bag limit of: Five per fisher including not more than two surgeonfish per fisher or six surgeonfish per boat, and 15 aggregate fish per boat on a fishing day (would not apply to a fisherman who has a valid commercial fishing license issued by Puerto Rico or the USVI). Action 4: Accountability Measures. Action 4a: Triggering Accountability Measures. Option 1: No Action. Do not trigger AMs. Option 2: Trigger AMs if the Annual Catch Limit is exceeded based upon: Sub-option A: A single year of landings beginning with landings from 2011. Sub-option B: A single year of landings beginning with landings from 2011, then a 2-year running average of landings in 2012 (average of 2011+2012) and thereafter (i.e., 2011, 2011-2012, 2012-2013, etc.). Sub-option C: A single year of landings beginning with landings from 2011, a 2-year average of landings in 2012 (average of 2011+2012), then a 3-year running average of landings in 2013 (average of 2011+2012+2013) and thereafter (i.e., 2011, 2011-2012, 2011-2013, 2012-2014, etc.). Option 3: Trigger AMs if the annual catch limit is exceeded as defined below and NMFS' SEFSC (in consultation with the Caribbean Fishery Management Council and its Scientific and Statistical Committee) determines the overage occurred because catches increased versus data collection/monitoring improved: Sub-option A: A single year of landings effective beginning 2011. Sub-option B: A single year of landings effective beginning 2011, then a 2-year running average of landings effective 2012 and thereafter (i.e., 2011, 2011-2012, 2012-2013, etc.). Sub-option C: A single year of landings effective beginning 2011, a 2-year running average of landings effective 2012, then a 3-year running average of landings effective 2013 and thereafter (i.e., 2011, 2011-2012, 2011-2013, 2012-2014, etc.). Action 4b: Apply Accountability Measures. Option 1: No Action. Do not apply AMs. Option 2: If AMs are triggered, then reduce the length of the fishing season for that species or species group the year following the trigger determination by the amount needed to prevent such an overage from occurring again. The needed changes will remain in effect until modified. Option 3: If AMs are triggered, then reduce the length of the fishing season for that species or species group the year following the trigger determination by the amount needed to prevent such an overage from occurring again and to pay back the overage. The needed changes will remain in effect until modified. Action 5: Framework Measures. Action 5a: Establish Framework Measures for the Spiny Lobster FMP. Option 1: No Action. Do not amend the framework measures for the Spiny Lobster FMP. Option 2: Amend the framework procedures for the Spiny Lobster FMP to provide a mechanism to expeditiously adjust the following reference points and management measures through framework action: a. Quota Requirements
                    ( print page 2672) b. Seasonal Closures c. Area Closures d. Fishing Year e. Trip/Bag Limit f. Size Limits g. Gear Restrictions or Prohibitions h. Total Allowable Catch (TAC) i. Annual Catch Limits (ACLs) j. Accountability Measures (AMs) k. Annual Catch Targets (ACTs) l. Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) m. Optimum Yield (OY) n. Minimum Stock Size Threshold (MSST) o. Maximum Fishing Mortality Threshold (MFMT) p. Overfishing Limit (OFL) q. Acceptable Biological Catch (ABC) control rules r. Actions to Minimize the Interaction of Fishing Gear with Endangered Species or Marine Mammals Option 3: Amend the framework procedures for the Spiny Lobster FMP to provide the Council with a mechanism to expeditiously adjust a subset of management measures outlined in Option 2. Action 5b: Establish Framework Measures for the Corals and Reef Associated Plants and Invertebrates FMP. Option 1: No Action. Do not amend the framework measures for the Corals and Reef Associated Plants and Invertebrates FMP. Option 2: Amend the framework procedures for the Corals and Reef Associated Plants and Invertebrates FMP to provide a mechanism to expeditiously adjust the following reference points and management measures through framework action: a. Quota Requirements b. Seasonal Closures c. Area Closures d. Fishing Year e. Trip/Bag Limit f. Size Limits g. Gear Restrictions or Prohibitions h. Fishery Management Units (FMUs) i. Total Allowable Catch (TAC) j. Annual Catch Limits (ACLs) k. Accountability Measures (AMs) l. Annual Catch Targets (ACTs) m. Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) n. Optimum Yield (OY) o. Minimum Stock Size Threshold (MSST) p. Maximum Fishing Mortality Threshold (MFMT) q. Overfishing Limit (OFL) r. Acceptable Biological Catch (ABC) control rules s. Actions to Minimize the Interaction of Fishing Gear with Endangered Species or Marine Mammals Option 3: Amend the framework procedures for the Corals and Reef Associated Plants and Invertebrates FMP to provide the Council with a mechanism to expeditiously adjust a subset of management measures outlined in Option 2. Special Accommodations These meetings are physically accessible to people with disabilities. For more information or request for sign language interpretation and other auxiliary aids, please contact Mr. Miguel A. Rolón, Executive Director, Caribbean Fishery Management Council, 268 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, Suite 1108, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00918-1920, telephone (787) 766-5926, at least five days prior to the meeting date. Dated: January 11, 2011. Tracey L. Thompson, Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.


BILLING CODE 3510-22-P BILLING CODE 3510-22-C [FR Doc. 2011-712 Filed 1-13-11; 8:45 am]