Affirmed and Opinion Filed June 19, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-13-01483-CR
No. 05-13-01484-CR
No. 05-13-01485-CR

RICHARD SAMUEL MORALES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Crimin al District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-58307-I, F10-59679-I, F10-60886-I



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Moseley, O’Neill, and FitzGerald Opinion by Justice FitzGerald

Richard Samuel Morales appeals from the adju dication of his guilt fo r assault resulting in

bodily injury and involving family violence, havi ng a previous conviction for assault involving

family violence; aggravated sexual assault w ith a deadly weapon; and aggravated kidnapping

with a deadly weapon. See T EX

. P ENAL C ODE A NN . §§ 20.04(b), 22.01(a), 22.021(a)(1)(A)(i)

(West 2011 & Supp. 2013); T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. §§ 71.0021, 71.005 (West 2008 & Supp.

2013). The trial court assessed pun ishment at ten years’ impris onment on the assault conviction

and thirty years’ imprisonment on the aggrav ated sexual assault and aggravated kidnappingconvictions. On appeal, appellan t’s attorney filed a brief in wh ich he concludes the appeals are

wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California

,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a profes sional evaluation of the record showing why, in

effect, there are no arguab le grounds to advance. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.

Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Coun sel delivered a copy of the brie f to appellant. We advised

appellant of his right to file a pro se res ponse, but he did not file a pro se response.

We have reviewed the records and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824,

827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the

appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the records that might arguably

support the appeals.

We affirm the trial court’s judgments.

Do Not Publish

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47
1301483F.U05 /Kerry P. FitzGerald/
KERRY P. FITZGERALD
JUSTICE

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

JUDGMENT

RICHARD SAMUEL MORALES, Appellant

No. 05-13-01483-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F10-58307-I). Opinion delivered by Justice FitzGerald, Justices Moseley and O’Neill participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED

.

Judgment entered June 19, 2014

/Kerry P. FitzGerald/
KERRY P. FITZGERALD
JUSTICE

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

JUDGMENT

RICHARD SAMUEL MORALES, Appellant

No. 05-13-01484-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F10-59679-I). Opinion delivered by Justice FitzGerald, Justices Moseley and O’Neill participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED

.

Judgment entered June 19, 2014

/Kerry P. FitzGerald/
KERRY P. FITZGERALD
JUSTICE

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

JUDGMENT

RICHARD SAMUEL MORALES, Appellant

No. 05-13-01485-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F10-60886-I). Opinion delivered by Justice FitzGerald, Justices Moseley and O’Neill participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED

.

Judgment entered June 19, 2014

/Kerry P. FitzGerald/
KERRY P. FITZGERALD
JUSTICE