alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASIUNGTON, D.C.
IN THE MATTER OF SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. FAA DOCKETNOS. 20I2NM060025; 2011NM06005; 201 1NM060073; 2011NM060072;

2011NM060047; 201 INM060063; 2011NM060038; 201 !NM06008I; 20I 1NM060095; 20l2NM0600 14 FDMS NOS. FAA-2013-0292; FAA 2012-0777; FAA-20 12-0868; FAA-2012-0869; FAA-2012-

0872; FAA-2012-0873; FAA-20 12-0874; FAA-2012-0904; FAA-20 13-0617; FAA-2013-0619

COMPLAINANT & RESPONDENT'S JOINT MOTION TO HOLD DECISIONS IN

ABEYANCE PENDING THE OUTCOME OF SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS

Complainant & Respondent file thisjoint motion to hold the decisions in the abovereferenced cases in abeyance pending the outcome ofsettlement negotiations between the parties. I. As ofSeptember24, 2015, the matter ofSkyWest Airlines. Inc., FAA Case No. 2011NM06005, FDMS No. FAA 2012-0777, was fully briefed before the Administrator. 2. As ofOctober 28,2015, the matter ofSkyWest Airlines, Inc., FAA Case No. 20!2NM0650025, FDMS No. FAA 2013-0292, was fully briefed before the Administrator. 3. As ofNovember 18,2015,the matters ofSkyWest Airlines. Inc., FAA Case Nos. 2011NM060073; 2011NM060072; 2011NM060047; 2011NM060063; 2011NM060038; 2011NM060081; 2011NM060095; 2012NM060014, and FDMS Nos. FAA-2012-0868; FAA-2012- 0869; FAA-2012-0872; FAA-2012-0873; FAA-2012-0874; FAA-2012-0904; FAA-20 13-0617; FAA-2013-0619, were fully briefed before the Administrator 

### in a consolidated appeal. 4. Representatives for Complainant and Respondent have initiated global settlement discussions applicable to SkyWest enforcement cases, inclusive ofthose cun·ently pending before the Administrator. These discussions may result in settlement ofthe above-listed cases.WHEREFORE, Complainant and Respondent respectfully request the Administrator hold any decisions in the above-referenced cases in abeyance pending the outcome of these settlement negotiations and a further motion by the parties.

Dated: April6, 2016 Respectfully submitted,



# ..r\ 

# r.r 1 11 1 I 

# t1U lJ! '/ j

# -~ 

# L
...**fft~ VIl~l~::**  

# v: 1 n··"· Casey E. Gardber,

# ~ttorney Enforcement Division, AGC-300 Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Federal Aviation Administration 800 Jndependence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591

Todd Emerson, Esq. General Counsel SkyWest Airlines 444 S. River Road St. George, UT 84790

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I served by personal delivery, the original and one copy ofthe foregoing Complainant's Request for an Extension ofTime in the matter ofSkyWest, Inc., FDMS NO. FAA2013-0292, et, aL, addressed to: Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Avenue SW Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl00 Washington, D.C., 20591
By: 

# B

**~** 

## y:_,,

**r~** Dated: April 7, 2016
### §583g. Rules and regulations; delegation of powers and duties

The Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior may severally prescribe such rules and regulations as may be appropriate to carry out the purposes of this subchapter. Each Secretary may delegate any of his powers and duties under this subchapter to other officers or employees of his Department.

(Mar. 29, 1944, ch. 146, §8, 58 Stat. 134.)
exv10w7



 





Exhibit 10.7




Operations Committee Compensation



In July 2007, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of SunCom Wireless Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) formed the Operations Committee to develop with management a long-range operating plan
for the Company and to oversee operations generally. The members of the Operations Committee are
Niles Chura, Patrick Daugherty, G. Edward Evans, Gustavo Prilick, Karim Samii, Joseph Thornton and
James Volk. The Board has approved compensation for services performed by members of the
Operations Committee (excluding Messrs. Chura, Daugherty, Samii and Thornton) at the rate of $450
per hour. In addition, in September 2007, the Board has approved $700,000 to be paid to Messrs.
Prilick and Volk in connection with their Operations Committee service upon the successful
consummation of the merger between the Company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of T-Mobile USA, Inc.
The $700,000 is to be apportioned between Mr. Prilick and Mr. Volk relative to their respective
contributions to the work of the Operations Committee.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 936

 960

 964

 974

 1,036

 1,016

 1,029

 1,058

 1,075

 1,127

 1,075

 979

 914

 858

 829

 868

 868

 894

 893

 878

 846

 844

 821

 782

 747

 778

 773

 760

 810

 768

 786

 897

 880

 897

 910

 893

 894

 902

 1,012

 1,021

 966

 890

 859

 830

 823

 826

 856

 849

 879

 849

 836

 797

 783

 740

 723

 749

 737

 708

 762

 746

 860

 918

 919

 937

 962

 943

 968

 942

 1,051

 1,075

 1,011

 932

 891

 845

 826

 854

 860

 871

 885

 866

 839

 822

 800

 755

 735

 768

 749

 728

 789

 757

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 547

 583

 584

 595

 611

 599

 614

 598

 666

 680

 641

 592

 567

 538

 526

 544

 547

 554

 563

 551

 535

 524

 510

 483

 470

 491

 479

 466

 504

 484

TOTAL 26,158

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
Exhibit 99.1

The undersigned officer of Moldflow Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 29, 2003 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as shall
not be deemed to be a part of the Report or "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.

|Date: May 14, 2003 | Name:  |  | /s/A. ROLAND THOMASA. Roland Thomas  
|------------------ | ------ |  | -------------------------------------
|                   | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

---
117 

010111 

010112 

010101T 215 

0101 

010100T 

0101 

0109 

010116 

0109 

010116 

010118 

010118 

010117 

BH118 

010117 

010117 

0109 

0109 

010114 

BH130

010114 

BH131

010114 

BH132 

010114 

010114 

BH129 

0105 

0105 

0105 

0105 

0115 

010115 

0115 BH134 BH137 

BH137 

137a 

BH138 

145 

BH144 

BH141 

BH141 

BH141 

BH139 

BH140 

BH139 

BH143 

147 

BH146 

BH146 

BH202 

146 

0106 

BH148 

BH148 

0106 

BH149 

BH150 

0106 

151 

BH122a 

BH123 

123 

BH122a 

BH123 

BH201 

BH201 

BH124 

BH201 

BH127 

BH125 

133 

133

BH125

BH126 

010113 

010113 

BH122 

010115 

010113 

0105 

0105 

180 181 

0105 

0105 

0110 

0110 

BH128 

010119 

010119 

200 

0101 

0101 

BH174 

BH121 

BH201 

BH201 

BH142 

0110 

BH120 

0110 

120 

209 

0110 209 

BH208 

0110 

BH134 

010115 

136 

010115 135 

Moose Creek Rd 

Soap Gulch Rd 

Camp Creek Rd 

43 

BH123 

BH121 

Camp Creek Rd 

1 

6 

154 

BH157 

BH155 

156 

BH157 BH158 

153 

BH152 

BH152 

BH159 

BH157 

268 

154 

BH259 

BH260 

BH261 

BH152 

BH262 

BH26 6

267 

BH263 

263 

264 265 

BH160 

FR447 

BH164 

FR447 

BH203 

161 

FR447 

163

162 

BH159 

BH159 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Feeley Hill Divide Creek Area 

Bureau of Land Management 

31 

36
 31 Mt Humbug
 36 36 31 

Butte Field Office 36
 

Draft RMP/EIS
 

Upper Big Hole River Travel
 15 

Plan Route Designations 6 

1 1 6

Under Alternative A
 1 

6 

15 

Humbug Spires 
 

Primitive Area Fish Creek Area
 

Divide 

Humbug Spires 

Trailhead 

31 

36 31 

0109 

6 1 6 

Old Glory
 

Mountain
 

Pandora
 

Mountain
 

36 

31 

36 

Map Shows Alternative A for the 

1 

Humbug Spires Locality of the Upper

1 

Big Hole River Travel Plan Area 6 

15 

BLM Routes Land Ownership 

Open Yearlong Bureau of Land Management (BLM) 

Closed 12/2 to 5/15 

Private 

Closed 10/15 to 5/15 

State Closed 10/15 to 12/1 

Closed Yearlong US Forest Service (USFS) 
 

BLM Hiking Trail
 Water
 

BLM Trailhead
 Humbug Spires Primitive Area 

Other Routes Area Closed to All Snowmobile Use 

Non-BLM Route 

Dillon Travel Plan Area Boundary

Field County Access Route 

Office Forest Service Route Contour Interval is 100 feet Butte Field
 Interstate
 

Office State Highway
 

Any BLM route that has a 3-digit number should have the prefix BH 

before it (i.e. 039 is BH039) 

Unless otherwise managed, BLM lands within the Upper Big Hole TPA 

are open to cross country snowmobile travel 

Albers Equal Area NAD83 Projection 

Miles 

0 1 2 

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of
 

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data 

Miles 

0 25 50 

for individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by

Melrose BLM. This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product 

was developed through digital means and information may be updated without 

February 2007 notification.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4971 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4971

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 15 East Market Street in Leesburg, Virginia, as the ``Norman Duncan 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 31, 2019

   Ms. Wexton (for herself, Mr. Beyer, Mr. Cline, Mr. Connolly, Mrs. 
  Luria, Mr. McEachin, Mr. Riggleman, Mr. Scott of Virginia, and Ms. 
 Spanberger) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 15 East Market Street in Leesburg, Virginia, as the ``Norman Duncan 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NORMAN DUNCAN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 15 East Market Street in Leesburg, Virginia, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Norman Duncan Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Norman 
Duncan Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

 Before the 

 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 69057 / March 7, 2013 

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-13199 

 

In the Matter of 

CORNERSTONE CAPITAL 

MANAGEMENT, INC., and 

LAURA JEAN KENT, 

Respondents. 

ORDER DIRECTING DISBURSEMENT 

OF DISTRIBUTION FUND 

On December 18, 2009, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission 

(“Commission”) issued a Notice of Proposed Plan of Distribution and Opportunity for Comment 

(“Distribution Plan”) (Exchange Act Rel. No. 61208) pursuant to Rule 1103 of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. §201.1103. The Notice 

advised parties that they could obtain a copy of the Distribution Plan at www.sec.gov. The 

Notice also advised that all persons desiring to comment on the Distribution Plan could submit 

their comments, in writing, within 30 days of the date of the Notice. No comments were 

received by the Commission in response to the Notice. On March 5, 2010, the Commission 

issued an Order Approving Plan and Appointing a Plan Administrator (Exchange Act Rel. No. 

61653). 

The Distribution Plan provides that the Plan Administrator will compile the necessary 

information regarding the Harmed Investors described in the Distribution Plan to be submitted to 

the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Financial Management Service (“FMS”) in the required file 

format, and Commission staff will then obtain authorization from the Commission to disburse 

pursuant to SEC Rule 1101(b)(6).1

 

 

1

 The Distribution Plan provides for three disbursement payments to the Harmed Investors. This is the 

second Order Directing Disbursement. The first Order Directing Disbursement was approved on 

September 17, 2010 (Exchange Act Rel. No. 62936). 
2

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Commission staff shall transmit the electronic file 

containing the necessary information regarding the Harmed Investors to FMS for the transfer and 

distribution of $121,117.06 in funds to the Harmed Investors in accordance with the Distribution 

Plan. 

 By the Commission. 

 

Elizabeth M. Murphy 

 Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          18,425
<SECURITIES>                                     8,792
<RECEIVABLES>                                      540
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,368
<PP&E>                                           2,902
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,188
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,697
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,092
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,292
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,188
<SALES>                                          5,064
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,064
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,819
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,047
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    866
<INCOME-TAX>                                       391
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       475
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
        

</TABLE>
### §916c. Unlawful acts

#### (a) Whaling, transporting, or selling violations; records; reports

It shall be unlawful for any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States (1) to engage in whaling in violation of the convention or of any regulation of the Commission, or of this subchapter, or of any regulation of the Secretary of Commerce; (2) to ship, transport, purchase, sell, offer for sale, import, export, or have in possession any whale or whale products taken or processed in violation of the convention, or of any regulation of the Commission, or of this subchapter, or of any regulation of the Secretary of Commerce; (3) to fail to make, keep, submit, or furnish any record or report required of him by the convention, or by any regulation of the Commission, or by any regulation of the Secretary of Commerce, or to refuse to permit any officer authorized to enforce the convention, the regulations of the Commission, this subchapter, and the regulations of the Secretary of Commerce, to inspect such record or report at any reasonable time.

#### (b) Acts of commission or omission

It shall be unlawful for any person or vessel subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to do any act prohibited or to fail to do any act required by the convention, or by this subchapter, or by any regulation adopted by the Commission, or by any regulation of the Secretary of Commerce.

(Aug. 9, 1950, ch. 653, §5, 64 Stat. 422; 1970 Reorg. Plan No. 4, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Emergency Assistance for Subsistence Whale Hunters

Pub. L. 107–372, title IV, §403, Dec. 19, 2002, 116 Stat. 3102, provided that: "Notwithstanding any provision of law, the use of a vessel to tow a whale taken in a traditional subsistence whale hunt permitted by Federal law and conducted in waters off the coast of Alaska is authorized, if such towing is performed upon a request for emergency assistance made by a subsistence whale hunting organization formally recognized by an agency of the United States Government, or made by a member of such an organization, to prevent the loss of a whale."

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Transfer of functions to Secretary of Commerce from Secretary of the Interior by Reorg. Plan No. 4 of 1970, see note set out under section 916 of this title.
(No. 74-CC-0666

#### Metal Air Corporation, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed September 22, 1977.*

Holderman, J.

This matter comes before the Court on motion of Respondent to dismiss said cause filed on August 12, *1041975, and motion filed by Claimant on March 18,1977, to rule on the August 12,1975, motion of Respondent to dismiss.

It appears to the Court that on February 17, 1977, Respondent filed a motion to continue generally.

The Court, being fully advised in the premises, finds:

The motion to dismiss sets forth that in 1964 Metal Air Corporation, along with other various and sundry companies, associations, etc. developed schemes for. rigging bids involving their type of work. The purpose of the scheme was to allow a designated bidder to bid upon a particular project and the rest of the contractors would then submit higher bids.

The Respondent, in its motion, cited the following sections of the statute:

“8. Participation by the Claimant herein in the arrangement described constituted a violation of Section 3 of the “Illinois Anti Trust Act” found in Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 38, paras. 60-1 through 60-11.

9. The participation in the arrangment described above constituted a fraud against the State in violation of Sec. 14 of the “Illinois Court of Claims Act.”

10. Illinois Rev. Stat., Ch. 127, para. 132.2, 1973 which is section 2 of the “Illinois Purchasing Act” states as follows:

> “It is the purpose of this Act and is hereby declared to be the policy of the State that the principal of competitive bidding and economical procurement practices shall be applicable to all purchases and contracts by or for any State agency.”

Section 10 of the “Illinois Purchasing Act” provides as follows:

> “Any contract entered into or purchase or expenditure of funds by a *105State agency in violation of this Act or the rules and regulations adopted in pursuance of this Act is void and of no effect.”

The 1969 Illinois Revised Statutes contains slightly different phraseology in Sections 2 and 10 of the “Illinois Purchasing Act” as follows:

> “Sec. 2. It is the purpose of this Act and is hereby declared the policy of this State that the principle of competitive bidding and economical procurement practices shall be applicable to all purchases and contracts for which State funds are expended.”

> “Sec. 10. Any contract entered into or purchase or expenditure of State funds made in violation of this Act or the rules and regulations adopted in pursuance of this Act is void and of no effect.”

Respondent concludes its motion by stating that the Claimant’s collusive participation in the bid rigging scheme violates both the letter and the spirit of the “Illinois Purchasing Act” and thereby pursuant to Section 10 of the Act renders the contract upon which this claim is based to be totally null and void.

It appears to the Court that Respondent’s motion to dismiss is correct. It is the opinion of the Court that this disposes of all the other matters pending and said cause is hereby dismissed.
(No. 74-CC-0624

#### Jack Kriesel, Father and Next Friend of Donald L. Kriesel, a Minor, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 15, 1978.*

*102Charles Kraut, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William J. Karaganis, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Holderman, J.

Claimant in this cause is seeking to collect for injuries sustained while walking on the premises of the Illinois Vehicle Testing Facility at 5301 West Lexington Avenue in Chicago, Illinois. It is the contention of the Claimant that while walking on these premises, he stepped on a piece of broken glass which went through his shoe into the bottom of his foot resulting in the injury.

Claimant, age 17, on the evening in question went to the Secretary of State, Illinois Vehicle Testing Facility, for the purpose of taking a driver’s test at about 6:00 p.m. with his driving instructor. Prior to the taking of the test, the instructor and Claimant walked to the testing course for the purpose of familiarizing Claimant with the course. In the driving area were man-made islands containing dirt and weeds. While walking across one of the islands, the injury occurred.

As a result of the injury, Claimant was required to get five sutures in the bottom of his foot, resulting in scarring. He paid $43.25 in medical bills, lost shoes which were valued at $14.00, and lost $23.00 in wages.

Respondent produced a supervisor of the testing area, Mr. W. Williams, who testified as to procedures used by the Secretary of State in cleaning the area. His testimony was to the effect that the State employed a *103janitorial service for the purpose of maintaining the grounds of the facilities, including debris removal, who performed their work on a daily basis. Mr. Williams denied seeing any broken glass on the facility himself in November, 1973, and denied that any of his employees had reported such information to him.

This Court has held many times that the State is not an insurer of the premises over which it has control and unless it has had actual notice or knowledge of the defect complained of, the State is not liable. The State does have the duty to maintain the premises owned or controlled by it in a reasonably safe condition for the purpose for which they are intended. The Claimant in this case has failed to prove that the State had knowledge or should have had knowledge of the condition causing the injury complained of.

Therefore, in line with 30 Ill.Ct.Cl. 410 and 417, this Court holds that Claimant failed to prove that the State either had notice of knowledge of the defect complained of and therefore the State is not responsible.

Award is hereby denied.