Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2011 / Notices 17403 

knowledge translation grantees to 

increase the use of research findings; 

(3) Collaborating with centers for 

independent living and other 

stakeholder groups to develop, 

implement, or evaluate strategies to 

increase utilization of the research 

findings; and 

(4) Conducting training and 

dissemination activities to facilitate the 

utilization of the research findings by 

community-based organizations and 

other service providers, policymakers, 

and individuals with disabilities. 

Types of Priorities 

When inviting applications for a 

competition using one or more 

priorities, we designate the type of each 

priority as absolute, competitive 

preference, or invitational through a 

notice in the Federal Register. The 

effect of each type of priority follows: 

Absolute priority: Under an absolute 

priority, we consider only applications 

that meet the priority (34 CFR 

75.105(c)(3)). 

Competitive preference priority: 

Under a competitive preference priority, 

we give competitive preference to an 

application by (1) awarding additional 

points, depending on the extent to 

which the application meets the priority 

(34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting 

an application that meets the priority 

over an application of comparable merit 

that does not meet the priority (34 CFR 

75.105(c)(2)(ii)). 

Invitational priority: Under an 

invitational priority, we are particularly 

interested in applications that meet the 

priority. However, we do not give an 

application that meets the priority a 

preference over other applications (34 

CFR 75.105(c)(1)). 

Final Priority: We will announce the 

final priority in a notice in the Federal 

Register. We will determine the final 

priority after considering responses to 

this notice and other information 

available to the Department. This notice 

does not preclude us from proposing 

additional priorities, requirements, 

definitions, or selection criteria, subject 

to meeting applicable rulemaking 

requirements. 

Note: This notice does not solicit 

applications. In any year in which we choose 

to use this priority, we invite applications 

through a notice in the Federal Register. 

Executive Order 12866: This notice 

has been reviewed in accordance with 

Executive Order 12866. Under the terms 

of the order, we have assessed the 

potential costs and benefits of this 

proposed regulatory action. 

The potential costs associated with 

this proposed regulatory action are 

those resulting from statutory 

requirements and those we have 

determined as necessary for 

administering this program effectively 

and efficiently. 

In assessing the potential costs and 

benefits—both quantitative and 

qualitative—of this proposed regulatory 

action, we have determined that the 

benefits of the proposed priority justify 

the costs. 

Discussion of Costs and Benefits 

The benefits of the Disability and 

Rehabilitation Research Projects and 

Centers Programs have been well 

established over the years in that similar 

projects have been completed 

successfully. This proposed priority will 

generate new knowledge through 

research and development. 

Another benefit of this proposed 

priority is that the establishment of a 

new RRTC will improve the lives of 

individuals with disabilities. The new 

RRTC will generate, disseminate and 

promote the use of new information that 

will improve the options for individuals 

with disabilities to live in and 

participate in their communities. 

Intergovernmental Review: This 

program is not subject to Executive 

Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 

CFR part 79. 

Accessible Format: Individuals with 

disabilities can obtain this document in 

an accessible format (e.g., braille, large 

print, audiotape, or computer diskette) 

on request to the program contact 

person listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT. 

Electronic Access to This Document: 

You can view this document, as well as 

all other documents of this Department 

published in the Federal Register, in 

text or Adobe Portable Document 

Format (PDF) on the Internet at the 

following site: http://www.ed.gov/news/ 

fedregister. 

To use PDF you must have Adobe 

Acrobat Reader, which is available free 

at this site. 

Note: The official version of this document 

is the document published in the Federal 

Register. Free Internet access to the official 

edition of the Federal Register and the Code 

of Federal Regulations is available on GPO 

Access at: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/ 

index.html. 

Dated: March 24, 2011. 

Alexa Posny, 

Assistant Secretary for Special Education and 

Rehabilitative Services. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7357 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

[CFDA: 84.133A–09] 

Proposed Priorities: Disability in the 

Family 

AGENCY: Office of Special Education and 

Rehabilitative Services, Department of 

Education. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for 

Special Education and Rehabilitative 

Services proposes a priority for the 

Disability and Rehabilitation Research 

Projects and Centers Program 

administered by NIDRR. Specifically, 

this notice proposes a DRRP on 

Disability in the Family. The Assistant 

Secretary may use this priority for 

competitions in fiscal year (FY) 2011 

and later years. We take this action to 

focus research attention on areas of 

national need. We intend this priority to 

contribute to increased participation 

and community living within the 

context of family life for individuals 

with disabilities and their families. 

DATES: We must receive your comments 

on or before April 28, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Address all comments about 

this notice to Marlene Spencer, U.S. 

Department of Education, 400 Maryland 

Avenue, SW., Room 5133, Potomac 

Center Plaza (PCP), Washington, DC 

20202–2700. 

If you prefer to send your comments 

by e-mail, use the following address: 

Marlene.Spencer@ed.gov. You must 

include the phrase ‘‘Proposed Priority 

for Disability in the Family’’ in the 

subject line of your electronic message. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marlene Spencer. 

Telephone: (202) 245–7532 or by email: Marlene.Spencer@ed.gov. 

If you use a telecommunications 

device for the deaf (TDD), call the 

Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 

1–800–877–8339. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

notice of proposed priority is in concert 

with NIDRR’s currently approved LongRange Plan (Plan). The Plan, which was 

published in the Federal Register on 

February 15, 2006 (71 FR 8165), can be 

accessed on the Internet at the following 

site: http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/ 

list/osers/nidrr/policy.html. 

Through the implementation of the 

Plan, NIDRR seeks to: (1) Improve the 

quality and utility of disability and 

rehabilitation research; (2) foster an 

exchange of expertise, information, and 

training to facilitate the advancement of 

knowledge and understanding of the 

unique needs of traditionally 

underserved populations; (3) determine 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
17404 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2011 / Notices 

best strategies and programs to improve 

rehabilitation outcomes for underserved 

populations; (4) identify research gaps; 

(5) identify mechanisms of integrating 

research and practice; and (6) 

disseminate findings. 

This notice proposes a priority that 

NIDRR intends to use for DRRP 

competitions in FY 2011 and possibly 

later years. However, nothing precludes 

NIDRR from publishing additional 

priorities, if needed. Furthermore, 

NIDRR is under no obligation to make 

an award for this priority. The decision 

to make an award will be based on the 

quality of applications received and 

available funding. 

Invitation to Comment: We invite you 

to submit comments regarding this 

notice. To ensure that your comments 

have maximum effect in developing the 

notice of final priority, we urge you to 

identify clearly the specific topic that 

each comment addresses. 

We invite you to assist us in 

complying with the specific 

requirements of Executive Order 12866 

and its overall requirement of reducing 

regulatory burden that might result from 

this proposed priority. Please let us 

know of any further ways we could 

reduce potential costs or increase 

potential benefits while preserving the 

effective and efficient administration of 

the program. 

During and after the comment period, 

you may inspect all public comments 

about this notice in room 5133, 550 12th 

Street, SW., PCP, Washington, DC, 

between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 

p.m., Washington, DC time, Monday 

through Friday of each week except 

Federal holidays. 

Assistance to Individuals with 

Disabilities in Reviewing the 

Rulemaking Record: On request we will 

provide an appropriate accommodation 

or auxiliary aid to an individual with a 

disability who needs assistance to 

review the comments or other 

documents in the public rulemaking 

record for this notice. If you want to 

schedule an appointment for this type of 

accommodation or auxiliary aid, please 

contact the person listed under FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. 

Purpose of Program: The purpose of 

the Disability and Rehabilitation 

Research Projects and Centers Program 

is (1) to plan and conduct research, 

demonstration projects, training, and 

related activities, including 

international activities, to develop 

methods, procedures, and rehabilitation 

technology that maximize the full 

inclusion and integration into society, 

employment, independent living, family 

support, and economic and social selfsufficiency of individuals with 

disabilities, especially individuals with 

the most severe disabilities, and (2) to 

improve the effectiveness of services 

authorized under the Rehabilitation Act 

of 1973, as amended (Rehabilitation 

Act). 

An applicant for assistance under this 

program must demonstrate in its 

application how it will address, in 

whole or in part, the needs of 

individuals with disabilities from 

minority backgrounds (34 CFR 

350.40(a)). The approaches an applicant 

may take to meet this requirement are 

found in 34 CFR 350.40(b). In addition, 

NIDRR intends to require all DRRP 

applicants to meet the requirements of 

the General Disability and 

Rehabilitation Research Projects (DRRP) 

Requirements priority that it published 

in a notice of final priorities in the 

Federal Register on April 28, 2006 (71 

FR 25472). 

Additional information on the DRRP 

program can be found at: http:// 

www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/resprogram.html#DRRP. 

Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g) 

and 764(a). 

Applicable Program Regulations: 34 

CFR part 350. 

Proposed Priority: This notice 

contains one proposed priority. 

DRRP on Disability in the Family. 

Background 

In the United States, approximately 

20.9 million American families have at 

least one member with a disability. NonHispanic White families and Asian 

families have the lowest incidence of 

disability, while Black families and 

American Indian and Alaska Native 

families have a much higher incidence 

of disability among family members. 

Families with at least one member with 

a disability are more likely to have 

lower median incomes, higher poverty 

rates, and a higher dependency on 

Social Security benefits and public 

assistance (U.S. Census, 2005). 

Individuals with disabilities often 

face barriers that make it difficult to 

fulfill family roles. Additionally, 

families with at least one member with 

a disability face a wide range of barriers 

to community living and community 

participation. Examples of these barriers 

include, but are not limited to: 

Inaccessible homes and building 

designs that make it difficult for a 

person with a disability to live with his 

or her family, or to participate with his 

or her family in community activities 

(National Council on Disability, 2010; 

Crews & Zvotka, 2006); laws, policies, 

and procedures that separate families, 

such as statutes that use disability status 

as grounds for terminating parental 

rights (Lightfoot, Hill, & LaLiberte, 

2010); economic burdens associated 

with care-giving (e.g., reduced wages 

and limited career options due to factors 

such as the need for time off work to 

care for family members with 

disabilities) (Anderson, Dumont, Jacobs, 

& Azzaria, 2007); health care 

information and treatments that are not 

designed to address the culture and 

language barriers faced by families from 

diverse cultures and backgrounds 

(Baker, Miller, Dang, Yaangh, & Hansen, 

2010); and a lack of effective and 

coordinated family supports (e.g., health 

care service and financing) across the 

lifespan of the family member with a 

disability (Lamar-Dukes, 2009; 

Reichman, Corman, and Noonan, 2008; 

Jokinen and Brown, 2005). 

NIDRR has funded a wide spectrum of 

cross-disability research and 

development activities related to 

families and individuals with 

disabilities. NIDRR grantees have 

addressed family topics including, but 

not limited to: parenting with a 

disability, caring for children with 

disabilities who have chronic health 

care conditions, child custody, family 

care-giving, family-based and peer 

support networks, and technologies that 

address the family-related needs of 

individuals with disabilities. 

NIDRR grantees also have produced 

information about the capabilities of 

parents with disabilities, information 

about how policies affect families that 

have members with disabilities, and 

technologies to assist parents with 

disabilities in caring for their children. 

This work has laid a foundation on 

which to base the identification, 

development, testing, and evaluation of 

interventions, programs, technologies, 

and products that facilitate participation 

and community living for individuals 

with disabilities and their families. 

References 

Anderson, D., Dumont, S., Jacobs, P., 

and Azzaria, L. (2007). The personal 

costs of caring for a child with a 

disability: A review of the 

literature. Public Health Reports, 

122, 3–16. 

Baker, D.L., Miller, E., Dang, M.T., 

Yaangh, C., & Hansen, R.L. (2010). 

Developing culturally responsive 

approaches with Southeast Asian 

American families experiencing 

developmental disabilities. 

Pediatrics, 26, S146–S150. 

Crews, D.E. & Zavotka, S. (2006). Aging, 

Disability and Frailty: Implications 

for Universal Design. Journal of 

Physiological Anthropology, 25, 

113–118. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2011 / Notices 17405 

Jokinen, N.S. & Brown, R.I. (2005). 

Family quality of life from the 

perspective of older parents. Journal 

of Intellectual Disability, 49(10), 

789–793. 

Lamar-Dukes, P. (2009). Reaching the 

hard to reach: A review of an 

initiative aimed at increasing 

participation and supports for 

people of color with disabilities and 

their families in disability 

organizations. Research and 

Practice for Persons with Severe 

Disabilities, 34, 76–80. 

Lightfoot, E., Hill, K., & LaLiberte, T. 

(2010). The inclusion of disability 

as a condition for termination of 

parental rights. Child Abuse and 

Neglect, 34(12), 927–934. 

National Council on Disability (2010). 

The state of housing in America in 

the 21st century: A disability 

perspective. [On-line]. Available: 

http://www.ncd.gov/newsroom/ 

publications/2010/ 

NCD_Housing_Report508.pdf. 

Reichman, N.E., Corman, H., & Noonan, 

K. (2008). Impact of child disability 

on the family. Maternal and Child 

Health Journal, 12, 679–683. 

U.S. Census Bureau. (2005). Disability 

and American families: 2000. [Online]. Available: http:// 

www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/ 

censr-23.pdf. 

Proposed Priority 

The Assistant Secretary for Special 

Education and Rehabilitative Services 

proposes a priority for a Disability and 

Rehabilitation Research Project (DRRP) 

on Disability in the Family. The DRRP 

must contribute to the outcome of 

increased participation and community 

living for individuals with disabilities 

and their families. 

To contribute to this outcome, the 

DRRP must: 

1. Conduct research activities, 

development activities, or both; 

2. Identify or develop, and test or 

evaluate interventions, programs, 

technologies, or products; 

3. Conduct knowledge translation 

activities (i.e., training, technical 

assistance, utilization, dissemination) in 

order to facilitate stakeholder (e.g., 

people with disabilities, families that 

have at least one member with a 

disability) use of the interventions, 

programs, technologies, or products that 

resulted from the research activities, 

development activities, or both; 

4. Involve key stakeholder groups in 

the activities described in paragraphs 1 

through 3 in order to maximize the 

relevance and usability of the 

interventions, programs, technologies, 

or products to be developed or studied; 

and 

5. Include families who are from 

traditionally underserved populations 

and who have at least one member with 

a disability as participants when 

conducting the activities described in 

paragraphs 1 through 3. 

To contribute to this outcome, the 

DRRP may: 

1. Focus its activities at the individual 

level, the family level, the systems level, 

or any combination of the three levels; 

2. Include in its activities families 

with a person with a disability of any 

age and any disability; 

3. Interpret the term ‘‘family’’ broadly; 

and 

4. Choose from a wide range of 

research and development topics and 

approaches within any of the domains 

in NIDRR’s currently approved Long 

Range Plan (i.e., participation and 

community living, technology for access 

and function, health and function, 

employment) in order to contribute to 

the outcome goal of increased 

participation and community living for 

individuals with disabilities and their 

families. 

Types of Priorities 

When inviting applications for a 

competition using one or more 

priorities, we designate the type of each 

priority as absolute, competitive 

preference, or invitational through a 

notice in the Federal Register. The 

effect of each type of priority follows: 

Absolute priority: Under an absolute 

priority, we consider only applications 

that meet the priority (34 CFR 

75.105(c)(3)). 

Competitive preference priority: 

Under a competitive preference priority, 

we give competitive preference to an 

application by (1) awarding additional 

points, depending on the extent to 

which the application meets the priority 

(34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting 

an application that meets the priority 

over an application of comparable merit 

that does not meet the priority (34 CFR 

75.105(c)(2)(ii)). 

Invitational priority: Under an 

invitational priority, we are particularly 

interested in applications that meet the 

priority. However, we do not give an 

application that meets the priority a 

preference over other applications (34 

CFR 75.105(c)(1)). 

Final Priority 

We will announce the final priority in 

a notice in the Federal Register. We will 

determine the final priority after 

considering responses to this notice and 

other information available to the 

Department. This notice does not 

preclude us from proposing additional 

priorities, requirements, definitions, or 

selection criteria, subject to meeting 

applicable rulemaking requirements. 

Note: This notice does not solicit 

applications. In any year in which we choose 

to use this priority, we invite applications 

through a notice in the Federal Register. 

Executive Order 12866: This notice 

has been reviewed in accordance with 

Executive Order 12866. Under the terms 

of the order, we have assessed the 

potential costs and benefits of this 

proposed regulatory action. 

The potential costs associated with 

this proposed regulatory action are 

those resulting from statutory 

requirements and those we have 

determined as necessary for 

administering this program effectively 

and efficiently. 

In assessing the potential costs and 

benefits—both quantitative and 

qualitative—of this proposed regulatory 

action, we have determined that the 

benefits of the proposed priority justify 

the costs. 

Discussion of Costs and Benefits 

The benefits of the Disability and 

Rehabilitation Research Projects and 

Centers Programs have been well 

established over the years in that similar 

projects have been completed 

successfully. This proposed priority will 

generate and promote new knowledge 

through research, development, and 

knowledge translation activities. 

Another benefit of this proposed 

priority is that the establishment of a 

new DRRP will improve the lives of 

individuals with disabilities and their 

family members. The new DRRP will 

generate and promote the use of new 

information that will improve the 

options for individuals with disabilities 

with regard to community living and 

community participation. 

Intergovernmental Review: This 

program is not subject to Executive 

Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 

CFR part 79. 

Accessible Format: Individuals with 

disabilities can obtain this document in 

an accessible format (e.g., braille, large 

print, audiotape, or computer diskette) 

by contacting the Grants and Contracts 

Services Team, U.S. Department of 

Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., 

room 5075, PCP, Washington, DC 

20202–2550. Telephone: (202) 245– 

7363. If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll 

free, at 1–800–877–8339. 

Electronic Access to This Document: 

You can view this document, as well as 

all other documents of this Department 

published in the Federal Register, in 

text or Adobe Portable Document 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
17406 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2011 / Notices 

Format (PDF) on the Internet at the 

following site: http://www.ed.gov/news/ 

fedregister. To use PDF you must have 

Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is 

available free at this site. 

Note: The official version of this document 

is the document published in the Federal 

Register. Free Internet access to the official 

edition of the Federal Register and the Code 

of Federal Regulations is available on GPO 

Access at: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/ 

index.html. 

Dated: March 24, 2011. 

Alexa Posny, 

Assistant Secretary for Special Education and 

Rehabilitative Services. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7359 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Postponement of Public Hearing on 

the Draft Environmental Impact 

Statement for the Mountaineer 

Commercial Scale Carbon Capture and 

Storage Project, Mason County, WV 

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy. 

ACTION: Postponement of public hearing. 

NOTICE: The U.S. Department of Energy 

(DOE) announced the availability of the 

Draft Environmental Impact Statement 

for the Mountaineer Commercial Scale 

Carbon Capture and Storage Project 

(DOE/EIS–0445D) for public review and 

comment in a Federal Register notice 

on Friday, March 11, 2011. The notice 

also provided the location and time for 

a public hearing for the Draft 

Environmental Impact Statement, 

scheduled for Wednesday, March 30, 

2011. The purpose of this notice is to 

inform interested parties that DOE has 

decided to postpone the public hearing; 

DOE will issue another notice 

announcing the new date and time for 

this meeting. 

Issued in Washington, DC on March 23, 

2011. 

Mark J. Matarrese, 

Director, Office of Environment, Security, 

Safety & Health, Office of Fossil Energy. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7332 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Proposed Subsequent Arrangement 

AGENCY: Office of Nonproliferation and 

International Security, Department of 

Energy. 

ACTION: Proposed subsequent 

arrangement. 

SUMMARY: This notice is being issued 

under the authority of section 131a. of 

the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 

amended. The Department is providing 

notice of a proposed subsequent 

arrangement under the Agreement for 

Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of 

Nuclear Energy Between the European 

Atomic Energy Community 

(EURATOM) and the United States of 

America and the Agreement for 

Cooperation between the Government of 

the United States of America and the 

Government of Norway Concerning 

Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy. 

DATES: This subsequent arrangement 

will take effect no sooner than April 13, 

2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Sean Oehlbert, Office of 

Nonproliferation and International 

Security, National Nuclear Security 

Administration, Department of Energy. 

Telephone: 202–586–3806 or e-mail: 

Sean.Oehlbert@nnsa.doe.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

subsequent arrangement concerns a 

request for a three-year extension (April 

2011 to April 2014) of the current 

programmatic approval for retransfer of 

U.S.-obligated irradiated fuel rods 

between Studsvik Nuclear AB, Sweden, 

and Institutt for Energiteknikk, Norway. 

The rods are being transferred for 

irradiation service, tests and 

examinations, and will be returned to 

Sweden for further test and final 

disposal. The total shipping amounts 

will be the same as allowed under the 

current approval—a maximum of 30,000 

grams uranium, 400 grams U–235 and 

400 grams plutonium in all shipments, 

combined, with a maximum of 100 

grams of plutonium per shipment. 

The original programmatic consent 

was approved in June 2006 and 

published in the Federal Register June 

13, 2006, (71 FR 34080). A one-year 

extension was approved in January 2007 

and published in the Federal Register 

January 23, 2007, (72 FR 2876). A threeyear extension was approved in March 

2008 and published in the Federal 

Register March 5, 2008, (73 FR 11894). 

The current extension is set to expire 

April 2011. If approved, the third 

extension, for three years, will extend to 

April 2014. Additional transactions are 

scheduled to occur between April 2011 

and April 2014 and will be subject to 

the U.S.-EURATOM Agreement for 

Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of 

Nuclear Energy. 

In accordance with section 131a. of 

the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 

amended, it has been determined that 

this subsequent arrangement will not be 

inimical to the common defense and 

security. 

Dated: March 8, 2011. 

For the Department of Energy. 

Anne M. Harrington, 

Deputy Administrator, Defense Nuclear 

Nonproliferation. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7326 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Proposed Subsequent Arrangement 

AGENCY: Office of Nonproliferation and 

International Security, Department of 

Energy. 

ACTION: Proposed subsequent 

arrangement. 

SUMMARY: This notice is being issued 

under the authority of section 131a. of 

the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 

amended. The Department is providing 

notice of a proposed subsequent 

arrangement under the Agreement for 

Cooperation Concerning Civil Uses of 

Nuclear Energy Between the 

Government of the United States of 

America and the Government of Canada 

and the Agreement for Cooperation in 

the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy 

Between the United States of America 

and the European Atomic Energy 

Community. 

DATES: This subsequent arrangement 

will take effect no sooner than April 13, 

2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Sean Oehlbert, Office of 

Nonproliferation and International 

Security, National Nuclear Security 

Administration, Department of Energy. 

Telephone: 202–586–3806 or e-mail: 

Sean.Oehlbert@nnsa.doe.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

subsequent arrangement concerns the 

retransfer of 44,379 kg of U.S.-origin 

natural uranium hexafluoride (UF6) 

(67.60% U), 30,000 kg of which is 

uranium, from Cameco Corporation 

(Cameco) in Port Hope, Ontario, Canada, 

to URENCO in Capenhurst, Chester, 

United Kingdom. The material, UF6 

produced from U.S.-origin concentrates, 

which is currently located at Cameco, 

will be transferred to URENCOCapenhurst for toll-enrichment and 

ultimate end use in the United States by 

STP Nuclear Operating Co. The material 

was originally obtained by Cameco from 

Crowe Butte Resources, Inc. pursuant to 

export license XSOU8798. 

In accordance with section 131a. of 

the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 

amended, it has been determined that 

this subsequent arrangement concerning 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES