alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 303.701 State performance plans and data collection. ( a ) *General.* Each State must have in place a performance plan that meets the requirements described in section 616 of the Act; is approved by the Secretary; and includes an evaluation of the State's efforts to implement the requirements and purposes of part C of the Act, a description of how the State will improve implementation, and measurable and rigorous targets for the indicators established by the Secretary under the priority areas described in § 303.700(d).
( b ) *Review of State performance plan.* Each State must review its State performance plan at least once every six years and submit any amendments to the Secretary.
( c ) *Data collection.* ( 1 ) Each State must collect valid and reliable information as needed to report annually to the Secretary under § 303.702(b)(2) on the indicators established by the Secretary for the State performance plans.
( 2 ) If the Secretary permits States to collect data on specific indicators through State monitoring or sampling, and the State collects data for a particular indicator through State monitoring or sampling, the State must collect and report data on those indicators for each EIS program at least once during the six-year period of a State performance plan.
( 3 ) Nothing in part C of the Act or these regulations may be construed to authorize the development of a nationwide database of personally identifiable information on individuals involved in studies or other collections of data under part C of the Act.
(Approved by Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0578) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1416(b), 1442)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Reliant Energy, Incorporated's
(i) Registration Statement on Form S-4 No. 333-11329; (ii) Registration
Statement on Form S-3 Nos. 33-46368, 33-54228, 333-20069, 333-32353, 333-33301,
333-33303, 333-58433, 333-70665, 333-81119 and 333-86403; (iii) Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-51417 on Form S-3; (iv)
Registration Statements on Form S-8 Nos. 333-32413, 333-32585, and 333-49333;
and (v) Post-Effective Amendments Nos. 1, 2 and 3 to Registration Statement No.
333-11329-99 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 1, 2000 (relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Reliant Energy, Incorporated (the
"Company")) appearing in this Combined Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company
and Reliant Energy Resources Corp. for the year ended December 31, 1999.


Deloitte & Touche LLP

Houston, Texas
March 15, 2000
(No. 79-CC-0772

#### Mary C. Fortin, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 27,1979.*

*962Per Curiam.

This cause comes before this Court as a result of a reconsideration of a job audit by the Director of Personnel. This claim is for retroactive pay as a result of the reallocation of the Claimant’s job reclassification.

The Respondent, represented before this Court by the Office of the Attorney General, submitted a stipulation which is as follows:

> “Now comes the Respondent by William J. Scott, Illinois Attorney General, William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General of Record and stipulates in the above captioned matter as follows:

> 1. This case arises as a result of a reconsideration of a job audit. The reallocation was approved by the Director of Personnel and pursuant to Rule 1-30 was held to be effective on March 16,1976.

> 2. The issue before this Court in this case is whether the awarding of retroactive salary as a result of a reallocation of job classification violates the prohibitions set forth in *Ch. 127, para. 145*which in part provides as follows:

> ‘Amounts paid from appropriations for personal service of any officer or employee of the State . . ., shall be considered a full payment for all services rendered between the dates specified in the payroll... and no additional sum shall be paid... which payments would constitute in fact and additional payment for work already performed and for which remuneration had already been made,.. .’

> 3. The above issues were dealt with fully in the case of *Claire Crawford, 32*Ill.Ct.Cl.__, and is dispositive of the issues presented by this case.

> 4. The Court in *Claire Crawford, supra,*decided that the miselassification amounted to an administrative error and that an award should be granted consistent with the Department of Personnel’s application of Rule 1-30.

> 5. Wherefore, Respondent consents to an award in the amount of $50.16 subject to appropriate added benefits and deductions and withholdings as required by law and the rules and regulations of the State of Illinois for retirement, F.I.C.A. and income tax withholdings.”

This Court concurs with the Attorney General and hereby grants an award to Mary C. Fortin in the amount of $50.16 subject to the appropriate added *963benefits and deductions and withholdings as required by laws, rules and regulations of the State of Illinois for retirement, F.I.C.A. and income tax withholdings.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 661

 677

 688

 689

 658

 686

 698

 673

 727

 0

 0

 686

 757

 746

 729

 758

 780

 819

 848

 857

 858

 886

 891

 884

 875

 845

 830

 824

 865

 870

 651

 662

 677

 658

 643

 631

 668

 655

 673

 0

 0

 625

 693

 705

 705

 730

 757

 777

 817

 849

 842

 841

 885

 874

 848

 831

 785

 818

 821

 859

 656

 673

 682

 674

 650

 651

 685

 663

 706

 0

 0

 638

 742

 725

 711

 747

 772

 796

 831

 853

 853

 863

 889

 878

 862

 839

 824

 820

 837

 865

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2022 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 421

 432

 437

 433

 418

 418

 439

 426

 452

 0

 0

 410

 475

 464

 455

 478

 493

 508

 530

 543

 543

 549

 565

 559

 549

 535

 525

 523

 533

 551

TOTAL 21,385

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 827

 873

 830

 730

 729

 669

 678

 601

 752

 798

 829

 822

 879

 838

 818

 828

 850

 805

 801

 777

 781

 772

 810

 790

 696

 640

 592

 611

 658

 685

 723

 330

 329

 335

 347

 349

 338

 339

 340

 348

 358

 356

 340

 383

 358

 350

 318

 328

 304

 296

 299

 312

 326

 344

 335

 351

 309

 321

 328

 337

 344

 351

 572

 604

 535

 540

 547

 492

 513

 464

 581

 606

 625

 554

 670

 588

 597

 568

 546

 523

 544

 519

 505

 539

 621

 584

 539

 479

 432

 478

 509

 502

 489

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 19, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 369

 389

 347

 350

 354

 320

 333

 303

 375

 391

 402

 358

 430

 379

 385

 367

 353

 339

 352

 337

 328

 349

 400

 377

 349

 312

 283

 311

 331

 326

 318

TOTAL 16,865

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
#### § 339.3 Relinquishment of naturalization jurisdiction.

Whenever a court relinquishes naturalization jurisdiction, the clerk of court shall, within ten days following the date of relinquishment, furnish the district director having administrative jurisdiction over the place in which the court is located, a certified copy of the order of court relinquishing jurisdiction. A representative of the Service shall thereafter examine the naturalization records in the office of the clerk of court and shall bind and lock them. The clerk of court shall return all unused forms and blank certificates of naturalization to the district director with his monthly report on Form N-4.

[22 FR 9825, Dec. 6, 1957]
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CHERNOFF DIAMOND & CO., LLC, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1891 ) GALLIN ASSOCIATES, INC., d/b/a ) GALLIN ASSOCIATES, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed November 14, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Jack R. St. Arnold, Judge. Christopher L. DeCort of Johnson & Cassidy, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Sheila Skellie of the Law Office of David J. Kurland, Largo, for Appellee.

LaROSE, Chief Judge.

Chernoff Diamond & Co., LLC, appeals the trial court's nonfinal order setting aside the final default judgment entered against Gallin Associates, Inc. We have jurisdiction, Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(1)(B); Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(5), and reverse.

We review the trial court's order for gross abuse of discretion. See United Capital Funding Corp. v. Technamax, Inc., 946 So. 2d 63, 64 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). To- 2 -

set aside the final default judgment, Gallin had to show: "(1) that the failure to file a responsive pleading was the result of excusable neglect; (2) that it has a meritorious defense; and (3) that it acted with due diligence in seeking relief from the default." See Allstate Floridian Ins. Co. v. Ronco Inventions, LLC, 890 So. 2d 300, 301 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (citing Goodwin v. Goodwin, 559 So. 2d 109 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)).

Gallin failed to prove excusable neglect. The record demonstrates that Gallin's president, Lawrence Gallin, was served with the complaint and knew he had to respond. Yet, he put the complaint and summons in a drawer, left for vacation, and forgot about the lawsuit until he received notice of the entry of a final judgment.

We are constrained to reverse and remand for the trial court to reinstate the final default judgment. See Bethesda Mem'l Hosp., Inc. v. Laska, 977 So. 2d 804, 807 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) ("[A] default will not be set aside where the defaulted party or his attorney (1) simply forgot or (2) intentionally ignored the necessity to take appropriate action; that is to say, where the conduct could reasonably be characterized as partaking of gross negligence or as constituting a willful and intentional refusal to act." (quoting Jeyanandarajan v. Freedman, 863 So. 2d 432, 433-34 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003))); see, e.g., Orlando Partners, Ltd. v. Classic Tour Lines, 492 So. 2d 1117, 1117 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (holding there was no excusable neglect where wife stated she told her husband about receipt of summons but forgot to tell him about hearing on motion for entry of default and husband did not recall knowledge of summons).

Reversed and remanded.

SILBERMAN and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00490-CR

Glenn Mitchell Neal

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 372nd District Court

of Tarrant County (1306779W)

February 5, 2015

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
#### Reginald de M. Wentworth, Respondent, v. Leon C. Riggs, Appellant.

Determination reversed and complaint dismissed, with costs, on dissenting opinion of Seabury, J., at the Appellate Term. (Reported in 79 Misc. Rep. 403.) Order to be settled on notice. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.; Scott, J., dissenting.
### §718t. Termination of State participation

The authority of a State to issue electronic stamps under this subchapter may be terminated—

(1) by the Secretary, if the Secretary—

(A) finds that the State has violated any of the terms of the application of the State approved by the Secretary under section 718q of this title; and

(B) provides to the State written notice of the termination by not later than the date that is 30 days before the date of termination; or

(2) by the State, by providing written notice to the Secretary by not later than the date that is 30 days before the termination date.

(Pub. L. 113–239, §7, Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2849.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE APRIL
30, 2000 BALANCE SHEET AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED APRIL 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                             480
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   480
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     480
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       480
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,520
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,520)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,520)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,520)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of A Better  Way  Financial
Corp.,  on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  Daniel L. Hodges, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2005


/s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §715d–3. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 15, 1935, ch. 261, title V, §501, 49 Stat. 383, authorized President to allocate out of appropriation made to him by resolution of April 8, 1935, a sum for acquisition of areas for bird sanctuaries and refuges.
From: Bill Schrock/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Higgins, Cortney " <Cortney _Higgins@omb.eop.gov> Cc: John Bradfield/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Kelley Spence/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Robin Dunkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 07/05/2012 11:09 AM Subject: Re: Pulp and Paper RTR draft final rule

________________________________________ Cortney

- Robin is out this week but she will be back in the office on Monday . I 'll try to get Joan to set the meeting up for Monday or Tuesday

- are those times still good? Also, we'll be getting the rest of the memos/supporting documents out to you later today . Let me know if y ou need any thing else. Thanks Bill Schrock U.S. EPA RTP, NC 27709 (919) 541

- 5032 (919) 541

- 3470 (fax)
Exhibit
      10.2


    AMENDMENT
      TO MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT

     

    This
      Amendment to Management Services Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made and entered
      into as of August 15, 2007, by and between DRTATTOFF, LLC, a California limited
      liability company (“Manager”) and William Kirby, D.O., an individual
      ("'Physician") with reference to the following facts: 

     

    A.
       Manager
      and Physician entered into that certain Management Services Agreement effective
      as of August 31, 2004 (the “MSA”), whereby Manager provides management services
      to Physician at 8670 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 203, Beverly Hills, California
      (the “Practice Site”). 

     

    B.
       Manager
      and Physician desire to amend the MSA to document that (1) the amount or the
      Management Fee has changed: and (2) the term of the Agreement shall be extended.
      

     

    NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained
      herein, the parties agree as follows: 

     

    1.
       Amendment
      of Section 4.a.
      The
      amount of the “Management Fee," as such term is defined in Section 4.a. of the
      MSA has been changed as fol1ows: 

     

    a.
      From
      the commencement date of the MSA through December 31, 2005, the amount of the
      Management Fee was 65% of Physician's “Gross Revenues,” as such term is defined
      in Section 4.a.; 

     

    b.
      From
      January 1, 2006 through the end of the term of this Agreement, the amount of
      the
      Management Fee shall be 60% of Physician Gross Revenues. 

     

    2.
       Amendment
      of Section 6.a.
      Section
      6.a of the MSA shall be amended to read as follows: 

     

    “6.
       Term
      and Termination. 

    


    a.
       Term.
      The
      initial term of this Agreement shall be for five (5) years
      commencing as of August 31, 2004 and ending on August 30, 2009.” 

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        
        

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

     

    3.  
      No Other
      Changes. Except as provided herein, all of the provisions, terms and conditions
      of the MSA shall remain the same and in full force and effect.

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to be effective
      as of the date first herein above written.

     

     

    
      	 	“MANAGER”	 	“PHYSICIAN”
	 	 	
            	 	
            
	 	DRTATTOFF, LLC	 	
            
	 	a California limited liability
              company	 	
            
	 	 	
            	 	
            
	 	By:	/s/
              James Morel	 	/s/
              William Kirby
	 	 	James Morel, Manager	 	William Kirby,
              D.O.


    

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        2
§ 381.10 What are the application requirements? ( a ) Regardless of the amount of funds appropriated for the PAIR program in a fiscal year, an eligible system shall submit to the Secretary an application for assistance under this part at the time and in the form and manner determined by the Secretary that contains all information that the Secretary determines necessary, including assurances that the eligible system will— ( 1 ) Have in effect a system to protect, and advocate for, the rights of eligible individuals with disabilities;
( 2 ) Have the same general authorities, including the authority to access records and program income, as in part C of title I of the DD Act;
( 3 ) Have the authority to pursue legal, administrative, and other appropriate remedies or approaches to ensure the protection of, and advocacy for, the rights of eligible individuals with disabilities within the State and the American Indian Consortium;
( 4 ) Provide information on and make referrals to programs and services addressing the needs of individuals with disabilities in the State and the American Indian Consortium, including individuals with disabilities who are exiting from school programs;
( 5 ) Develop a statement of objectives and priorities on an annual basis and a plan for achieving these objectives and priorities;
( 6 ) Provide to the public, including individuals with disabilities and, as appropriate, their representatives, an opportunity to comment on the objectives and priorities established by, and activities of, the eligible system including— ( i ) The objectives and priorities for the activities of the eligible system for each year and the rationale for the establishment of those objectives and priorities; and
( ii ) The coordination of the PAIR program provided through eligible systems with the advocacy programs under— ( A ) Section 112 of the Act (CAP);
( B ) The Older Americans Act of 1965 (the State long-term care ombudsman program);
( C ) Part C of the DD Act; and
( D ) The PAIMI;
( 7 ) Establish a grievance procedure for clients or prospective clients of the eligible system to ensure that individuals with disabilities are afforded equal access to the services of the eligible system;
( 8 ) Use funds made available under this part to supplement and not supplant the non-Federal funds that would otherwise be made available for the purpose for which Federal funds are provided; and
( 9 ) Implement procedures designed to ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, mediation (and other alternative dispute resolution) procedures, which include good faith negotiation, are used before resorting to formal administrative or legal remedies.
( b ) To receive direct payment of funds under this part, an eligible system must provide to the Secretary, as part of its application for assistance, an assurance that direct payment is not prohibited by or inconsistent with tribal or State law, regulation, or policy.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0018) (Authority: Sections 12(c) and 509(f) and (g)(1) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 794e(f) and (g)(1))