### 23283 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 18, 2012 / Notices

Signed at Washington, DC, on the 12th day of April 2012.
Hilda L. Solis, Secretary of Labor.

[FR Doc. 2012–9360 Filed 4–17–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4510–24–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF LABOR**

**Office of the Secretary**

**All Items Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; United States City**  **Average**

Pursuant to Section 33105(c) of Title 49, United States Code, and the delegation of the Secretary of Transportation’s responsibilities under
that Act to the Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration (49 CFR, Section 501.2(a)(9)), the Secretary
of Labor has certified to the Administrator and published this notice
in the Federal Register that the United States City Average All Items Consumer
Price Index for All Urban Consumers (1967 = 100) increased 116.6 percent from its 1984 annual average of 311.1 to its 2011 annual average of 673.818.

Signed at Washington, DC, on the 12th day of April 2012.
Hilda L. Solis, Secretary of Labor.

[FR Doc. 2012–9362 Filed 4–17–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4510–24–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF LABOR**

**Office of the Secretary**

**Tribal Consultation Policy**

**AGENCY :**  Office of the Secretary, Labor.

**ACTION :**  Proposed policy: Request for

comments.

**SUMMARY :**  The Department of Labor seeks comments on a proposed tribal consultation policy. This policy would establish standards for improved consultation with federally recognized
Indian Tribes to the extent that a
conflict does not exist with laws or regulations. It would apply to any Department action that affects federally recognized Indian tribes and would require that the Department’s government-to-government consultation involve appropriate Tribal and Departmental officials.

**DATES :**  We will consider all comments received by June 18, 2012.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit comments and additional materials using any of the following methods.

Electronically: Submit comments electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the Web site instructions for submitting
comments for docket number: DOL–

2012–0002.

Regular Mail, express delivery, hand (courier) delivery or messenger service: Submit comments to Jeremy Bishop, Special Assistant to the Secretary, Office of Public Engagement, U.S. Department of Labor, Room C2313, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Jeremy Bishop, Office of the Secretary,

202–693–6452 or bishop.jeremy@dol.gov

.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The U.S. Department of Labor’s proposed policy
on consultation with tribes is set forth
below.

U.S. Department of Labor

Tribal Consultation Policy

I. Background and Purpose

A. Executive Order 13175 and the

Department of Labor’s Relationship With
Indian Tribes
B. Referenced Authorities

II. Guiding Principles

A. Government-to-Government

Relationship and Tribal SelfDetermination B. Open Communications and Respect for

Cultural Values and Traditions C. Ensuring Consultation Is Meaningful

III. Policy Statement

A. Departmental Consultation Policy

Generally B. Implementation Responsibilities of DOL

Operating Agencies

IV. Regulations

V. Unfunded Mandates

VI. Flexibility and Waivers

VII. Consultation Process Guidelines

VIII. Performance and Accountability

IX. Designated Officials and Points of

Contact A. Designated Departmental Official. B. Point of Contact for Each DOL Agency.

X. Definitions

XI. Supplemental Terms and Effective Date Appendix A—Executive Order 13175

I. Background and Purpose

A. Executive Order 13175 and DOL’s Relationship With Indian Tribes

The United States has a unique legal and political relationship with Indian tribal governments, established through and confirmed by the Constitution of the United States, treaties, statutes, executive orders, and judicial decisions. In recognition of that special relationship, pursuant to Executive Order 13175 of November 6, 2000, executive departments and agencies are charged with engaging in regular and meaningful consultation and
collaboration with tribal officials in the development of federal policies that have tribal implications, and are responsible for strengthening the government-to-government relationship
between the United States and Indian
tribes.

The Department of Labor (DOL) has collaborated extensively with American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/AN) for many years in advancing its mission of fostering job opportunities, improvingworking conditions, and assuring workrelated benefits and rights of workers
and retirees in the United States. In recent years, senior DOL officials have conducted many site visits in Indian Country and regularly engage with Indian tribes and their representatives, including the National Congress of American Indians. The Department’s
collaboration with Indian tribes encompasses a broad range of DOL matters affecting tribes, including joint efforts to improve tribal program management, rulemaking, regulations, policies, waivers and flexibility, grant programs, contracting opportunities, and regulatory guidance.

The Department’s Employment and Training Administration (ETA), for example, awards grants to Indian and Native American entities for programs that have become a key part ofimproving tribal economic selfsufficiency by ensuring that tribal
workers have the skills to build and operate new infrastructure and facilities at the tribal community level and
facilitate the creation of new business opportunities in Indian Country. ETA’s
Division of Indian and Native American Programs (DINAP) administers employment and training services grants to tribal communities in ways that are
consistent with the traditional cultural values and beliefs of the people they are designed to serve, including youth and at-risk populations facing employment barriers. DINAP works closely with the Native American Employment and Training Council (NAETC), a federal advisory committee comprised of representatives of Indian tribes, tribal organizations, Alaska Native entities, Indian-controlled organizations serving Indians, or Native Hawaiian organizations appointed by the Secretary of Labor. The NAETC provides advice to the Secretary regarding the overall operation and administration of tribal programs
authorized under Section 166 of the Workforce Investment Act (Pub. L. 105– 220, as amended), as well as the implementation of other DOL tribal programs and services.

The Department’s Women’s Bureau (WB) has an ongoing relationship with
the United Indians of All Tribes
Foundation and works with its


### 23284 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 18, 2012 / Notices

Procurement Technical Assistance Center to provide information to Indian
women small business owners concerning workforce development trends and DOL contract opportunities. The WB is also part of a network of Indian women organizations that collaborate on finding ways to end
domestic violence and abuse. The Department’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) works in
concert with the Council for Tribal Employment Rights to increase the employment of AI/ANs by federal contractors and subcontractors through linkages, referrals, training, regular communication, and sharing of information and resources pursuant to federal contractors’ obligations.

The Department’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) works with Indian tribes by providing compliance assistance and including the tribes in relevant OSHA outreach and awareness campaigns addressing worker safety and health. OSHA is making its contacts with Indian tribes more regular and consistent, and seeks to establish voluntary protection programs, partnerships, and alliances with tribal groups in the interest of promoting job safety in Indian Country. OSHA also makes available workplace safety grants that Indian tribes may qualify for, such as the Susan Harwood Training Grants.

The Department’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) assists Indian tribes with training programs for miners and has provided annual grant funds to the Navajo Nation to educate miners and mine operators on safe working practices in the mining industry and compliance with applicable MSHA regulations.

These are among many of DOL’s ongoing actions to engage with tribes and support the efforts of tribal governments to have sustainable tribal
communities and achieve our mutual goals of ensuring fair wages, employee rights, and workplace safety while working to alleviate the high unemployment found on tribal lands. The Department is committed to building on these efforts to engage in regular and meaningful consultation
and collaboration with tribal officials on policies and actions that have tribal implications, including the development of this formal tribal consultation policy. Accordingly, this policy has been developed in
consultation with Indian tribes and
tribal officials as set forth in Executive
Order 13175.

Implementation of this tribal consultation policy will facilitate greater consistency across the DOL in carrying out tribal consultations and will improve collaboration with Indian tribes at all levels of Departmental organizations and offices. This policy will also ensure that a reporting structure and process is in place so that all Departmental tribal consultation work will be transparent and accountable. DOL employees having responsibility for the outcomes of
consultation and collaborative activities
will be better able to assess effectiveness
and coordinate their efforts with other related Departmental initiatives. Through these efforts, the Department anticipates an even stronger relationship with Indian tribes and improved program delivery to meet the needs of
Indian tribes and communities.

B. Referenced Authorities

This tribal consultation policy document was developed based upon:

1. Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, Public Law 93–638, as amended (25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.).
2. Indian Self-Determination Act Amendments of 1994, Public Law 103–413 (25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.). 3. Native American Programs Act, Public Law 93–644, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2991 et seq.). 4. Presidential Memorandum,

Government-to-Government
Relations with Native American Tribal Governments, April 29, 1994. 5. Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, November 6,

2000. 6. Presidential Memorandum,

Government-to-Government Relationship with Tribal Governments, September 23, 2004. 7. Presidential Memorandum, Tribal Consultation, November 5, 2009. 8. OMB Memorandum M–10–33, Guidance for Implementing E.O. 13175, July 30, 2010.

II. Guiding Principles

A. Government-to-GovernmentRelationship and Tribal SelfDetermination

The United States, in accordance with treaties, statutes, executive orders, and judicial decisions, has recognized the right of Indian tribes to self-governmentand maintains a government-togovernment relationship with federally recognized tribes. Indian tribes exercise inherent sovereign powers over their members and territory. The Federal
Government has enacted numerous statutes and promulgated numerous regulations that establish and define a trust relationship with Indian tribes. Based on this government-togovernment relationship, DOL will
continue to work with Indian tribes on its programs involving tribes in amanner that respects tribal selfgovernment and sovereignty, honors tribal treaty and other rights, and meets
the Federal Government’s tribal trust responsibilities.

B. Open Communications and Respect for Cultural Values and Traditions

Communication and the exchange of ideas will be open and transparent. Department officials will respect the
cultural values and traditions of the tribes. To ensure efficiency and avoid duplicative efforts, DOL will work with other Federal Departments to enlist their interest and support in cooperative efforts to assist tribes to accomplish their goals within the context of all DOL

programs. C. Ensuring Consultation Is Meaningful

The Department is committed to ongoing and continuous dialogue with Indian tribes, both formally and informally, on matters affecting tribal
communities. Consultation is a critical ingredient of a sound and productive federal-tribal relationship that emphasizes trust, respect, and shared responsibility. Engaging with tribes and building relationships with tribal officials have improved the Department’s policy toward Indian tribes on a broad range of DOL matters. The Department is committed to further improving its collaboration with Indian tribes and creating additional opportunities for input from all affected
tribal communities. Consultation that is meaningful, effective, and conducted in good faith makes the Department’s operation, decision making, and governance practices more efficient.

III. Policy Statement

A. Departmental Consultation Policy Generally

In accordance with Executive Order 13175, when formulating and implementing policies that will have tribal implications, it is the Department’s policy that, to the extent practicable and permitted by law,
consultation with affected Indian tribes
will occur. As stated in the executive order, this refers to proposed legislation, regulations, policies, or actions that
have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.


### 23285 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 18, 2012 / Notices

B. Implementation Responsibilities of DOL Operating Agencies

Each DOL operating agency will have an accountable process to ensure meaningful and timely input by Indian tribes on policies or actions that have tribal implications. With respect to DOL programs administered by Indian tribal governments, operating agencies will grant Indian tribal governments the
maximum administrative discretion permissible consistent with applicable law, contracting requirements, and grant agreements, and will defer to Indian tribes to develop their own policies and standards where legally permissible. The Department’s operating agencies will review their existing tribal consultation and program administration practices, including those of their regional offices, and revise them as needed to comply with the Department’s policy as set forth in this document. If DOL agencies require technical assistance in conducting consultations, the designated Departmental official’s office (see section IX below) can provide and/or
coordinate such assistance.

IV. Regulations

In accordance with Executive Order 13175, to the extent practicable and permitted by law, prior to the promulgation of any regulation that has tribal implications and preempts tribal law, the DOL agency involved will:

1. Notify and consult with affected Indian tribes early in the process of developing the proposed regulation
consistent with the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 551 et seq., Executive Order 12866, and Executive Order 13563, and ensure that the tribes are informed about opportunities to participate in stakeholder meetings and public forums about which they might not otherwise be aware;

2. Provide a tribal summary impact statement in a separately identified portion of the preamble to the regulation
as it is to be issued in the Federal Register , which consists of a description of the extent of the agency’s prior consultation with Indian tribes, a summary of the nature of their concerns and the agency’s position supporting the need to issue the regulation, and a
statement of the extent to which the
concerns of tribal officials have been met; and

3. Make available to the Secretary any
written communications submitted to the agency by tribal officials.On issues relating to tribal selfgovernance, tribal self-determination, and implementation or administration of tribal programs, each DOL agency will make all practicable attempts where appropriate to use consensual mechanisms for developing regulations, including negotiated rulemaking in accordance with the Negotiated Rulemaking Act. For any draft final regulation that has tribal implications that is submitted to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs for review under E.O. 12866, the agency will certify that the requirements
of Executive Order 13175 have been

met.

V. Unfunded Mandates

In accordance with Executive Order 13175, no DOL agency shall promulgate any regulation having tribal implications that is not required by statute and imposes substantial direct compliance costs on tribal communities,
unless:

1. Funds necessary to pay the direct costs incurred by Indian tribal governments in complying with the regulation are provided by the Federal Government; or

2. Prior to the formal promulgation of the regulation, the agency:

a. Consulted with tribal officials early in the process of developing the proposed regulation;

b. In a separately identified portion of the preamble to the regulation as it is to
be issued in the Federal Register

, provides to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget a description of the extent of the agency’s prior consultation with representatives of affected Indian tribal governments, a summary of the nature of their concerns and DOL’s position supporting the need to issue the regulation; and

c. Makes available to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget any written communications submitted to DOL by such Indian tribal governments.

VI. Flexibility and Waivers

With respect to statutory or regulatory requirements that are discretionary and subject to waiver by DOL, each DOL agency will review the processes under which Indian tribal governments apply for waivers and take appropriate steps to streamline those processes as necessary.

When reviewing any application by an Indian tribal government for a waiver of regulatory requirements in connection with any program administered by a DOL agency, the agency will consider the relevant factors with a general view toward increasing opportunities for utilizing flexible policy approaches at the Indian tribal level in cases in which the proposed waiver is consistent with the applicable federal policy objectives and is otherwise appropriate as determined by the agency.

Each DOL agency will promptly render a decision upon a complete application for a waiver. The agency will provide the applicant with timely written notice of the decision and, if the application for a waiver is not granted,
the reasons for such denial.

VII. Consultation Process Guidelines

1. Notification. When a DOL agency or regional office determines that a proposed policy or action will have tribal implications, whether for an individual tribe, regionally, or nationally, the DOL agency will have an affirmative responsibility to provide advance notice to the potentially
affected Indian tribes at the earliest practicable time, but not less than 60 days prior to DOL’s action. An Indian tribe may initiate a request for consultation with DOL or a DOL agency
on a DOL matter that it believes has tribal implications at any time by contacting that agency or the designated Departmental official (see section IX),
and the tribe should disseminate DOL provided information to its members. With respect to rulemaking proceedings of general applicability that have no unique impacts on Indian tribes, DOL agencies may use the existing Federal Register notice and comment process to provide notice, but should supplement this process with targeted outreach where appropriate.

2. Subjects of Consultation. To the extent consistent with applicable laws and administrative requirements, consultation can involve any DOL matter having tribal implications, including but not limited to: tribal program management, rulemaking, regulations, policies, waivers and flexibility; grant programs; contracting opportunities; regulatory guidance; and
other matters of tribal interest. At the same time, DOL agencies should not
create undue burdens on tribes with respect to regulations or other matters that do not have tribal implications. Routine matters, including normal DOL interactions with direct grantees such as monitoring, selecting grantees, and reporting requirements do not trigger further consultation processes under this policy. Enforcement policy, planning, investigations, cases and proceedings are not appropriate subjects for consultation under this policy.

3. Initial Planning and Scoping. Following notification to affected tribes that policies or actions have tribal implications, the DOL agency or regional office, in conjunction with the designated Departmental official’s office, should engage with those tribes


### 23286 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 18, 2012 / Notices

on initial planning and the appropriate scope of the consultation. Initial planning and scoping should include describing the nature and extent of the expected tribal implications; identifying any time constraints or deadlines, relevant existing policies, and potential resource issues; and making a
determination as to the most useful and appropriate consultation mechanism.

4. Consultation Mechanisms. The
manner of consultation should be appropriate to the nature and complexity of the matter and can occur via mailings (e.g., for remote tribes that may not have Internet access), one or more face-to-face meetings or meetings via teleconference, roundtables, or other appropriate means and may include the use of electronic media and messaging and Web site portals. All meetings will be open to the public.

5. Conducting Consultations. When a consultation commences, DOL will
solicit the views of the Indian tribes involved on the relevant subjects and
issues. Consultation should involve a thorough examination of the subject at issue, including discussion of cultural, economic and other impacts on tribal programs, services, functions and activities; compliance guidance; programmatic and funding issues if relevant; any external constraints such as executive, judicial, or legislative actions; and any relevant technical or other regulatory issues as they affect
tribes.

6. Frequency of Consultation Meetings. Consultation meetings may be scheduled on a regular basis or on an as needed basis except that at least one national tribal consultation meeting will be held by DOL each calendar year. For example, DOL agencies may establish a quarterly or semi-annual conference call
with the tribes in order to consult with them on the regulatory proposals being considered by the agency and inform them about opportunities to participate in stakeholder meetings and public forums. To reduce costs, tribes and DOL agencies will make their best efforts to
coordinate face-to-face consultation meetings to coincide with other regularly scheduled meetings (such as multi-agency and association meetings and regional tribal meetings).

7. Submissions of Tribal Comments. The DOL agency involved in the
consultation will communicate clear and explicit instructions on the means
and time frames for Indian tribes to submit comments to DOL on the matter, whether in person, by teleconference, and/or in writing, and if appropriate will allow a reasonable period of time following a consultation meeting for
tribes to submit additional materials. A written communication on the correspondence of the highest elected or appointed tribal official will be considered by DOL to be the official position of the tribe on the subject at issue. If the DOL agency determines that
the Administrative Procedure Act or other federal law or regulation prohibits continued discussion at a specified point in the decision-making process, the agency will so inform the Indian tribes. With respect to rulemaking proceedings of general applicability that will have no unique impacts on Indian tribes, DOL agencies may use existing Federal Register notices, dockets, and comment periods to obtain tribal comments, but should supplement them with additional means of obtaining tribal input where appropriate.

8. Time Frames. Time frames for the consultation process will depend on the nature and complexity of the
consultation and the need to act quickly. Suggested guidelines are as
follows:

a. The initial planning and scoping should take place within 30 days from
the date of the issuance of the notice of the proposed action;

b. If a consultation meeting will occur, the meeting should be scheduled within 30 days of the completion of the planning and scoping;

c. For consultations involving one or more meetings, the consultation process should normally be concluded within 60 days of the final consultation meeting; for consultations not involving meetings the consultation process should normally be concluded within 60 days of the planning and scoping.

These time frames may be compressed in exigent situations, such as when a critical deadline is involved, or expanded as necessary for novel or highly complex matters.

9. Reporting of Outcome of
Consultation to Tribes. The DOL agency involved in the consultation will report
the status or outcome of the issue
involved to the affected Indian tribes within 30 days of the conclusion of the
consultations on that issue. To the extent that tribal input was not adopted, the agency will make written explanations available.

10. Formation of Tribal Committees, Task Forces, or Work Groups. Based on the government-to-government relationship, consultation under this policy is generally with one or more individual tribal governments. In some cases, it may become necessary for DOL to form a tribal committee, task force, or work group to study a particular policy, practice, issue, or concern. Members of such committees or work groups will include representatives of federally recognized tribal governments or their designees with authority to represent
their interests or act on their behalf. Tribal representation on such committees or work groups should consist of geographically diverse small, medium and large tribes, whenever possible. Members of these committees or work groups shall make good-faith attempts to attend all meetings which shall be open to the public and may establish member roles and protocols for producing their work and obtaining input and comment on it. All final work group products or recommendations will be given serious consideration by the Department. [See Section XI below on the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) exemption for consultations undertaken with officials of federally recognized tribal governments pursuant to this tribal consultation policy.]

11. Use of Existing Statutory Advisory

Committees. DOL agencies may also use existing tribal advisory committees such as the NAETC as part of meeting their consultation responsibilities under this policy. If such an advisory committee is required by law to be used exclusively for a particular function or purpose, consultation shall take place in accordance with the requirements of such committee and nothing in this policy requires any further consultation (see, e.g., 29 U.S.C. 2911(h)).

12. Submission of Comments by Other AI/AN Organizations. The primary
focus of formal consultation activities under this policy is with representatives of federally recognized Indian tribal governments. DOL recognizes, however,
that in some cases the consultation process would be negatively affected if other (non-federally recognized) AI/ANorganizations lacking the governmentto-government relationship were excluded. Accordingly, nothing in this policy prohibits other AI/AN organizations that are not representatives of Indian tribal governments from providing their views to the Department.

VIII. Performance and Accountability

The consultation process and activities conducted under this policy should be accountable, transparent, and result in a meaningful outcome for the Department and for the affected Indian tribes. To enable the Department and the Indian tribes to effectively evaluate the implementation and results of this consultation policy:

1. DOL agencies will maintain records
of each consultation and the manner in
which the tribal concerns were addressed, and will document the status or outcome of each subject of
consultation.


### 23287 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 18, 2012 / Notices

2. DOL agencies will develop and utilize appropriate evaluation measures
to assess their efforts to determine
whether their overall consultation process is effective over time.

3. DOL agencies will report annually to the office of the designated Departmental official on the frequency, scope, and effectiveness of their consultation activities including any
recommendations received from Indian tribes on ways to improve the consultation process.

4. The designated Departmental official’s office will compile the reports of the agencies and prepare an annual DOL consultation report evaluating the overall effectiveness of this policy
which will be made available to the
Indian tribes. The office will seek tribal
feedback on the annual consultation report and consider any comments from Indian tribes and federal participants to
determine whether DOL should make any amendments to this policy.

5. The designated Departmental official’s office will prepare and submit any reports required to be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget
under Executive Order 13175 and the November 5, 2009 Presidential
Memorandum.

IX. Designated Officials and Points of

Contact

A. Designated Departmental Official

The designated Departmental official to coordinate the implementation of this policy will be the Director, Office of Public Engagement, working in conjunction with the Department’s Office of Intergovernmental Affairs in the Office of Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs, or other Departmental official in the Office of the Secretary, as designated by the Secretary.

The duties and responsibilities of the designated Departmental official include: serving as the Secretary’s expert informational resource on tribal matters; maintaining an overall understanding of tribal concerns and issues as they relate to DOL programs and coordinating and managing the Secretary’s policies for Indian tribes;
coordination of tribal site visits for DOL executive leadership; serving as DOL’s representative on interdepartmental working groups on tribal matters; conducting periodic intradepartmental meetings and otherwise overseeing the implementation of the Department’s tribal consultation policy by DOL operating agencies; providing advice and assistance to DOL agencies and regional field offices on tribal matters; and conducting outreach to national tribal government organizations.

B. Point of Contact for Each DOL Operating Agency

Each DOL operating agency will designate a senior official as having primary responsibility for tribal matters. The designated Departmental official’s office will maintain an up-to-date list clearly identifying the agency tribal
officials and their contact information
and this information will be made available to Indian tribes. DOL agencies should also designate an alternate tribal
official to serve in the absence of the primary official.

The duties and responsibilities of the agency tribal officials include: having and maintaining knowledge of thispolicy and the government-togovernment relationships and sovereign status of Indian tribes; serving as the primary liaison with Indian tribes for their agency; ensuring the consultation responsibilities of their agencies are carried out, including those of their regional offices; and reporting to the administration in their respective agencies, as well as the designated Departmental official. Unless otherwise approved by the designated Departmental official, these responsibilities should not be placed within the agency Offices of Civil Rights, as tribal relations and consultations are treaty, trust, and government-to-government based, and are not a function of civil rights based

on race.

X. Definitions

For the purposes of this policy, the following definitions apply:

American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN)— A member of an American Indian or Alaska Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village, or community of indigenous peoples in the United States, as membership is defined by the tribal community, including Native

Hawaiians.

AI/AN Organization —An AI/AN organization or group having members that are not representatives of federally recognized Indian tribal governments,
such as state tribes and members of urban AI/AN groups that are not located
on Indian tribal lands.

Consultation —An enhanced form of communication consisting of an open and free exchange of information and opinion among parties which emphasizes trust, respect, and shared responsibility. The consultation process enables mutual understanding,
facilitates the effort to reach consensus on issues, and contributes to informed decision making. Deliberative Process Privilege —A privilege exempting the Federal
Government from disclosure of government agency materials containing opinions, recommendations, and other internal communications that are part of the deliberative process within the Department or agency.

Department —Means the U.S. Department of Labor.

DOL Operating Agency —A Department of Labor administration, agency, bureau, office, or division that: (1) Has operational responsibility for a Departmental program that has tribal implications; or (2) has been designated by the Secretary to participate in this policy.

Executive Order —An order issued by
the Federal Government’s executive on the basis of authority specifically granted to the executive branch (as by the U.S. Constitution or a Congressional Act).

Indian Tribe —An Indian or Alaska Native tribe that the Secretary of the Interior acknowledges to exist as an Indian tribe pursuant to the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994, 25 U.S.C. 479a, and with whom
the Federal Government maintains a government-to-government relationship, including any Alaska Native village or regional or village corporation as defined in or established pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (85 Stat. 688)(43 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.). The Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Indian Affairs maintains and regularly publishes the official list of federally recognized Indian tribes which are generally established pursuant to a federal treaty, statute, executive order, court order, or a federal administrative action making these tribes eligible for certain federal programs and benefits
because of their status as Indians.

Policies or Actions with Tribal Implications—Refers to proposed legislation, regulations, policies, and
actions that have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and the Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. This encompasses a broad range of DOL programs and activities targeted at tribal governments or having AI/ANs as participants including, but not limited to, tribal program management, rulemaking, regulations, policies, waivers and flexibility; grant programs; contracting opportunities; regulatory guidance; or other DOL activities that
would have a substantial direct effect on a tribe’s traditional way of life, tribal lands, tribal resources, or the ability of


### 23288 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 18, 2012 / Notices

the tribe to govern its members or to provide services to its members. This
term does not include matters that are the subject of litigation or that are
undertaken in accordance with an administrative or judicial order.

Secretary —Means the Secretary of
Labor.

Substantial Direct Compliance

Costs—Those costs incurred directly from implementation of changes necessary to meet the requirements of a federal mandate. Because of the large variation in resources among tribes, ‘‘substantial costs’’ will vary by Indian tribe. Where necessary and appropriate, the Secretary will determine the level of costs that represent ‘‘substantial costs’’
in the context of an Indian tribe’s
resource base.

To the Extent Practicable and Permitted by Law —Refers to situations where the opportunity for consultation is limited due to practical constraints including time, budget, or other such reason, and situations where other legal requirements take precedence.

Tribal Committee, Task Force, or Work Group —A group composed of Indian tribal government officials or their designees with authority to represent their interests or act on their
behalf that is formed to work on a particular policy, practice, issue, or
concern. This can include representatives of existing organizations representing federally recognized tribes, such as the National Congress of
American Indians.

Tribal Officials—Tribal council members and delegates, chairpersons, or other elected or duly appointed officials of the governing bodies of Indian tribes or authorized intertribal organizations or their designees with authority to represent them or act on their behalf.

XI. Supplemental Terms and Effective

Date

1. Inapplicability of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). In accordance with section 204(b) of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4), the provisions of FACA are not applicable to consultations
between the Federal Government and elected officers of tribal governments or their designated employees with authority to act on their behalf. Therefore, FACA is generally not applicable to consultations undertaken pursuant to this tribal consultation policy. As the Office of Management and Budget stated in its guidelines implementing section 204(b):

This exemption applies to meetings between Federal officials and employees and * * * tribal governments acting through their elected officers, officials, employees, and Washington representatives, at which ‘views, information, or advice’ are exchanged concerning the implementation of intergovernmental responsibilities or administration, including those that arise explicitly or implicitly under statute, regulation, or Executive Order. The scope of meetings covered by this exemption should be construed broadly to include meetings called for any purpose relating to intergovernmental responsibilities or administration. Such meetings include, but are not limited to, meetings called for the purpose of seeking consensus, exchanging views, information, advice, and/or recommendations; or facilitating any other interaction relating to intergovernmental responsibilities or administration. (OMB Memorandum 95–20 (September 21, 1995), pp. 6–7, published at 60 FR 50651, 50653 (September 29, 1995)).

If, however, DOL were to form anadvisory committee consisting of (nonfederally recognized) AI/AN organizations or groups lacking the government-to-government relationship, the section 204(b) exception would not apply and all FACA requirements
would need to be followed.

2. Reservation of Authorities. Nothing in this policy waives or diminishes the U.S. Government’s rights, authorities, immunities, or privileges, including the deliberative process privilege. Among other things, internal communications on the development of proposed legislation, enforcement policy, and other internal policy matters are part of the deliberative process by the
Executive Branch and will remain
confidential.

Nothing in this policy waives or diminishes any tribal rights, authorities, immunities, or privileges including treaty rights and sovereign immunities, and this policy does not diminish any rights or protections afforded to
individual AI/ANs under federal law.

3. Disclaimer. This document is intended to improve the Department’s management of its relations and cooperative activities with Indian tribes. DOL has no obligation to engage in any consultation activities under this policy unless they are practicable and permitted by law. Nothing in this policy requires any budgetary obligation or creates a right of action against the Department for failure to comply with this policy nor creates any right, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by a party against the United States, its agencies, or any person.

Dated: April 12, 2012.

Hilda L. Solis, Secretary of Labor.

[FR Doc. 2012–9372 Filed 4–17–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4510–23–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR** 

**Employment and Training**
**Administration**

**Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker**  **Adjustment Assistance**

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA–W) number issued during the period of March 26, 2012 through March 30, 2012

.

In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:

(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely;
and

(3) One of the following must be
satisfied:

(A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased;

(B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased;

(C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased;

(D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased;
and

(4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:

(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially