alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2013230EN.01S00301.xml

| 29.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 230/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 230/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
(No. 78-CC-1702

#### Albert W. Edmonds, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed November 20, 1978.*

Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of *870certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas v. State, 32*Ill.Ct.Cl.__, this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
### §1728. Weight of mail increased fraudulently

Whoever places any matter in the mails during the regular weighing period, for the purpose of increasing the weight of the mail, with intent to cause an increase in the compensation of the railroad mail carrier over whose route such mail may pass, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 785; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §358 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §228, 35 Stat. 1134).

Reference to persons causing or procuring was omitted as unnecessary in view of definition of "principal" in section 2 of this title.

Minor verbal changes were made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $20,000".
Date Total Particulate Conc. (grains per SCF) Total Particulate Emission (lbs/hr) Total Fluoride Emission (lbs/hr) Total Fluoride Conc. (grains per SCF) Total Secondary Fluoride Emission (lbs/ton) Total Primary and Secondary Fluoride Emission (lbs/ton) 

## Summary of Results 2010 Method 14 Testing Performed During Annual Particulate and Monthly Total Fluoride Results

Total Primary Emission (lbs/ton) Line Avg. Aluminum Production Rate (tons/hr) Method

1.8 1.8 0.057 18.50 0.000393 10.49 1 January 14 1.7 1.7 0.057 17.53 0.000344 10.46 1 February 14 1.7 1.7 0.043 16.99 0.000286 10.12 1 March 14 1.8 1.9 0.043 18.59 0.000316 10.08 1 April 14 1.9 1.9 0.043 18.73 0.000278 9.98 1 May 14 3.0 3.1 0.043 28.32 0.000477 9.38 1 June 14 1.7 1.7 0.043 15.62 0.000212 9.45 1 July 14 2.1 2.1 0.043 20.01 0.000343 9.52 1 August 14 1.0 1.1 0.043 10.78 0.000161 10.27 1 September14 1.0 1.1 0.043 10.37 0.000156 10.00 1 October 14 54.76 1.1 1.2 0.043 12.11 0.000194 0.0009 10.65 1 November5 & 14 1.5 1.6 0.043 16.54 0.000302 10.73 1 December 14

1.7 1.8 0.049 17.97 0.000385 10.31 2 January 14 1.2 1.3 0.049 12.85 0.000248 10.33 2 February 14 0.9 0.9 0.049 9.19 0.000165 10.30 2 March 14 0.9 0.9 0.049 8.79 0.000146 10.33 2 April 14 1.4 1.5 0.049 14.64 0.000194 10.22 2 May 14 1.8 1.8 0.049 18.15 0.000248 10.22 2 June 14 1.8 1.9 0.049 19.42 0.000290 10.52 2 July 14 1.2 1.2 0.049 12.39 0.000201 10.36 2 August 14 1.2 1.2 0.049 12.22 0.000223 10.48 2 September14 1.1 1.1 0.049 11.14 0.000176 10.34 2 October 14 25.04 1.0 1.0 0.049 9.88 0.000182 0.0005 10.38 2 November5 & 14 1.2 1.3 0.083 12.64 0.000235 10.30 2 December 14

1.5 1.6 0.030 9.09 0.000300 5.93 3 East June 14 1.1 1.1 0.030 6.59 0.000233 6.05 3 East July 14 1.8 1.8 0.030 10.73 0.000340 6.07 3 EastAugust 14 1.4 1.4 0.030 8.62 0.000294 6.10 3 EastSeptember14 1.2 1.3 0.030 7.50 0.000251 6.03 3 EastOctober 14 1.2 1.2 0.036 7.39 0.000217 6.18 3 EastNovember 14 19.48 1.5 1.5 0.036 9.01 0.000375 0.0008 6.17 3 EastDecember5 & 14

0.9 0.9 0.042 5.12 0.000162 6.00 3 West April 14 1.2 1.3 0.042 7.11 0.000236 5.88 3 West May 14 1.6 1.7 0.051 9.50 0.000300 5.93 3 West June 14 

### Page 1 of 2Date Total Particulate Conc. (grains per SCF) Total Particulate Emission (lbs/hr) Total Fluoride Emission (lbs/hr) Total Fluoride Conc. (grains per SCF) Total Secondary Fluoride Emission (lbs/ton) Total Primary and Secondary Fluoride Emission (lbs/ton) 

## Summary of Results 2010 Method 14 Testing Performed During Annual Particulate and Monthly Total Fluoride Results

Total Primary Emission (lbs/ton) Line Avg. Aluminum Production Rate (tons/hr) Method

1.4 1.5 0.051 8.49 0.000261 6.05 3 West July 14 1.7 1.8 0.051 10.33 0.000289 6.07 3 WestAugust 14 1.1 1.2 0.051 7.01 0.000206 6.10 3 WestSeptember14 1.5 1.5 0.051 8.92 0.000233 6.03 3 WestOctober 14 1.3 1.4 0.051 8.33 0.000230 6.18 3 WestNovember 14 21.95 1.1 1.2 0.051 6.87 0.000240 0.0006 6.17 3 WestDecember5 & 14



### Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self Employed Correspondence Exam Practitioner Engagement Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving                               ( print page 17996)                            customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.                    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Monday, May 23, 2011 and Tuesday, May 24, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self Employed Correspondence Exam Practitioner Engagement Project Committee will be held Monday, May 23, 2011 from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and Tuesday, May 24, 2011 from 8 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. Mountain Time in Denver, CO. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Notifications of intent to participate must be made with Ms. Janice Spinks. For more information and site location please contact Ms. Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: March 24, 2011.

Shawn Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. 

[FR Doc. 2011-7510 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
First Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 This is the first amendment to the Employment Agreement dated August 29, 2004 between ZymoGenetics,
Inc. and Douglas E. Williams. 
 Effective July 1, 2007, the following terms are amended: 
 Section 1 “Employment”: “Executive Vice President, Research and Development” is replaced with “President”;

 Section 2 “Duties”: “President” is replaced with “Chief Executive Officer”; 
 Section 4.4 “Good Reason”, Parts e) and f): “Executive Vice President, Research and Development” is replaced with
“President”; 
 Section 13 “Notices”: For purposes of Notices, Executive’s title of “Executive Vice
President, Research and Development” is replaced with “President”, and Bruce L.A. Carter’s title of “President and CEO” is replaced with “CEO and Chairman.” 
 All other terms remain unchanged as of July 1, 2007. 
  

			
	ZYMOGENETICS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ BRUCE L.A. CARTER
	Dr. Bruce L. A. Carter, Chief Executive Officer & Chairman
	
	EXECUTIVE:
	
	/s/ DOUGLAS E. WILLIAMS
	Douglas E. Williams, Ph.D.
	
	Date: August 21, 2007
### §2322. Chop shops

(a) In General.—

(1) Unlawful action.—Any person who knowingly owns, operates, maintains, or controls a chop shop or conducts operations in a chop shop shall be punished by a fine under this title or by imprisonment for not more than 15 years, or both. If a conviction of a person under this paragraph is for a violation committed after the first conviction of such person under this paragraph, the maximum punishment shall be doubled with respect to any fine and imprisonment.

(2) Injunctions.—The Attorney General shall, as appropriate, in the case of any person who violates paragraph (1), commence a civil action for permanent or temporary injunction to restrain such violation.

(b) Definition.—For purposes of this section, the term "chop shop" means any building, lot, facility, or other structure or premise where one or more persons engage in receiving, concealing, destroying, disassembling, dismantling, reassembling, or storing any passenger motor vehicle or passenger motor vehicle part which has been unlawfully obtained in order to alter, counterfeit, deface, destroy, disguise, falsify, forge, obliterate, or remove the identity, including the vehicle identification number or derivative thereof, of such vehicle or vehicle part and to distribute, sell, or dispose of such vehicle or vehicle part in interstate or foreign commerce.

(Added Pub. L. 102–519, title I, §105(a), Oct. 25, 1992, 106 Stat. 3385.)
[No. 8458.

Department Two.

January 28, 1910.]

#### Douglas C. Conover, *Respondent,*v. Mary Carpenter *et al., Appellants.*
      *1*

Attorney and Client —• Fees — Offset — Negligence—Evidence— Sufficiency. In an action for attorney’s services rendered to an estate, the defendant cannot offset the negligence of the plaintiff resulting in defendant’s payment of an improper inheritance tax, where it appears from an inventory verified by the defendant that the tax was a proper charge against the estate, and there was no evidence to the contrary except plaintiff’s opinion, given to the defendant, that it was not a proper charge.

Trial — Instructions—Comment on Facts. An instruction stating facts that are not disputed is not prejudicial as a comment on the evidence.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gay, J., entered June 19, 1909, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.

Affirmed.

*Elias A. Wright,*for appellants.

*Horace A. Wilson,*for respondent.

Reported in 106 Pac. 620.

Mount, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover the alleged value of services rendered as an attorney at law for the defendant, at her special instance and request. The cause was tried to a court and a jury. A verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiff, and from the judgment rendered thereon, the defendant has appealed.

It is argued that the court erred in withdrawing from the consideration of the jury an item of $22.01, alleged as an offset to the amount prayed for in the complaint. It is alleged that this item was paid by the appellant to the state, as an inheritance tax upon an estate, through the carelessness of the respondent, and that the item was not a proper *147charge against the estate. There is no evidence in the record, except the opinion of the respondent expressed to the appellant prior to the payment, that the item was not a proper charge against the estate. It was paid by the appellant after she had discharged the respondent, and upon the inventory verified by the appellant. The court was, therefore, clearly justified in withdrawing from the jury the consideration of the item, even if it was not a proper charge against the estate. Upon the face of the inventory verified by the appellant, the charge was a proper one.

It is also argued that the court erred in giving to the jury the following instruction:

“You will take the files in the probate case bearing Mr. Conover’s signature. Do not get them mixed as you take them out. Put them back together. These files that are in there bear Mr. Conover’s signature, and they are supposed to represent some of the work he did.”

It is argued that the last sentence of this instruction was a comment by the court upon the facts. The facts there stated were not disputed facts. They were admitted, and therefore the statement could not be prejudicial.

No other errors are assigned. We find no merit in the appeal, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

Rudkin, C. J., Dunbar, Pabkeb,, and Cbow, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4983 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4983

    To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based 
    outpatient clinic in Gilbert, Arizona, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
       Alexander W. Conrad Veterans Affairs Health Care Clinic''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 5, 2019

   Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Gallego, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Stanton, Mr. 
    Grijalva, Mrs. Lesko, Mrs. Kirkpatrick, Mr. O'Halleran, and Mr. 
 Schweikert) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based 
    outpatient clinic in Gilbert, Arizona, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
       Alexander W. Conrad Veterans Affairs Health Care Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) Staff Sergeant Alexander W. Conrad of Chandler, 
        Arizona, joined the United States Army on June 1, 2010.
            (2) Staff Sergeant Conrad's decorated service includes two 
        deployments to Afghanistan in support of Operation Enduring 
        Freedom.
            (3) Staff Sergeant Conrad subsequently deployed to Africa 
        in support of Operation Octave Shield, while assigned to 1st 
        Battalion, 3rd Special Forces Group, Fort Bragg, North 
        Carolina, as a Human Intelligence Noncommissioned Officer.
            (4) On June 8, 2018, Staff Sergeant Conrad died in Somalia 
        from injuries sustained from indirect enemy fire.
            (5) Staff Sergeant Conrad was posthumously awarded the 
        Purple Heart, Bronze Star with Valor, and Meritorious Service 
        Medal.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF STAFF SERGEANT ALEXANDER W. CONRAD VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS HEALTH CARE CLINIC.

    (a) Designation.--The Southeast Veterans Affairs Health Care Clinic 
located at 3285 South Val Vista Drive, Gilbert, Arizona, shall after 
the date of the enactment of this Act be known and designated as the 
``Staff Sergeant Alexander W. Conrad Veterans Affairs Health Care 
Clinic''.
    (b) Reference.--Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Staff 
Sergeant Alexander W. Conrad Veterans Affairs Health Care Clinic''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income Tax Credit Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer  Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on  improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Monday, May 23, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marianne Ayala at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7978.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income Tax Credit Project Committee will be held Monday, May 23, 2011, from 3 p.m. to 4 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Marianne Ayala. For more information please contact Ms. Ayala at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7978, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or contact us at the web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: March 24, 2011.

Shawn Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2011-7532 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
§ 637.15 What are cooperative projects? ( a ) Cooperative project grants assist groups of nonprofit accredited colleges and universities to work together to conduct a science improvement project.
( b ) Activities that the Secretary may fund under cooperative projects include, but are not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Assisting institutions in sharing facilities and personnel;
( 2 ) Disseminating information about established programs in science and engineering;
( 3 ) Supporting cooperative efforts to strengthen the institutions' science and engineering programs; and
( 4 ) Carrying out a combination of any of the activities in paragraphs (c)(1)-(3) of this section.
( c ) Eligible applicants for cooperative projects are groups of nonprofit accredited colleges and universities whose primary fiscal agent is an eligible minority institution as defined in § 637.4(b).
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1067-1067c, 1067g-1067k, 1068, and 1068b)
### Geology of the Railroad mining district, Elko County, Nevada

By: Keith Brindley KetnerJ. Fred Smith Jr.

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1162B

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.