alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 661.10 What activities does the Secretary assist under this program? The activities that the Secretary may assist institutions of higher education to conduct under this program, include but are not limited to— ( a ) Innovation and improvement of international education curricula to serve the needs of the business community, including the development of new programs for nontraditional, mid-career, or part-time students;
( b ) Development of programs to inform the public of increasing international economic interdependence and the role of American business within the international economic system;
( c ) Internationalization of curricula at junior and community colleges, and at undergraduate and graduate schools of business;
( d ) Development of area studies programs and interdisciplinary international programs;
( e ) Establishment of export education programs through cooperative arrangements with regional and world trade centers and councils, and with bilateral and multilateral trade associations;
( f ) Research for and development of teaching materials relating to international education, including language materials, and facilities appropriate to business-oriented students;
( g ) Establishment of student and faculty fellowships and internships for training and education in international business activities;
( h ) Development of opportunities for business and other professional school junior faculty to acquire or strengthen international skills and perspectives;
( i ) Development of research programs on issues of common interest to institutions of higher education and private sector organizations and associations engaged in or promoting international economic activity;
( j ) The establishment of internships overseas to enable foreign language students to develop their foreign language skills and their knowledge of foreign cultures and societies;
( k ) Establishing linkages overseas with institutions of higher education and organizations that contribute to the educational objectives of this program; and
( l ) Summer institutes in international business, foreign area, and other international studies designed to carry out the purposes of this program.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1130-1130b)
[49 FR 24362, June 12, 1984, as amended at 52 FR 28426, July 29, 1987; 58 FR 32577, June 10, 1993]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 13, 2012

jam

Order 

September 13, 2012

145842 (28)

IN RE STONER

LARRY ROBERT STONER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 145842

COA: 309041

WASHTENAW CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE, 

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $23.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$352.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this 

Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 85

 80

 137

 109

 112

 96

 133

 96

 230

 212

 151

 171

 182

 181

 180

 160

 184

 210

 199

 204

 214

 235

 235

 230

 226

 217

 238

 249

 251

 240

 232

 71

 68

 69

 65

 70

 74

 80

 71

 64

 151

 132

 131

 149

 133

 133

 136

 143

 164

 149

 150

 156

 156

 155

 157

 154

 158

 170

 173

 179

 188

 193

 76

 73

 85

 80

 82

 85

 101

 83

 155

 169

 140

 146

 159

 150

 145

 143

 160

 184

 175

 180

 183

 184

 186

 181

 178

 180

 188

 203

 207

 207

 209

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 1, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 63

 61

 69

 65

 67

 69

 78

 67

 112

 120

 103

 106

 114

 109

 106

 104

 115

 130

 124

 127

 129

 130

 131

 128

 126

 127

 132

 141

 144

 144

 145

TOTAL 4,677

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           98908
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    89464
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                202180
<PP&E>                                           30767
<DEPRECIATION>                                   22604
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  311543
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            64523
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     243331
<COMMON>                                          9766
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    311543
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                539842
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                419281
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 120561
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             120561
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    120561
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12
        


</TABLE>
#### BROWN COUNTY, a Public Corporation, Respondent, v. EASTON, Appellant.

(250 N. W. 668.)

(File No. 7512.

Opinion, filed October 26, 1933.)

*H. O. Hepperle,*of Aberdeen, for Appellant.

*Prank L. Sieh,*State’s Attorney, of Aberdeen, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The questions presented by the appeal in the instant case are identical with those considered in the companion case of Brown County v. Hall, 61 S. D. 568, 249 N. W. 253. In accordance with our opinion and 'decision in that case, the order appealed from is affirmed.

All the Judges concur.
(No. 00024

#### Mildred Scannell as wife of James R. Scannell, deceased, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 16, 1973.*

Mildred Scannell, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, and Vincent Biskupic, Special Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

This claim, arising out of the death of a policeman killed in the line of duty, seeks payment of compensation to the decedent’s beneficiary pursuant to the provisions of the "Law Enforcement Officers and Fireman Compensation Act”, [hereafter, "the Act”] *Ch. 48, Sec. 281, et. seq., Ill.Rev.Stat., 1971.*

The court has carefully considered the application for benefits submitted on the form prescribed and furnished by the Attorney General; a written statement of the decedent’s supervising officer; and a report by the Illinois Attorney General’s office which substantiates matters set forth in the application. Based upon these documents and other evidence submitted at a hearing before the full court on July 12, 1973, the court finds as follows:

1. That the claimant, Mildred Scannell, is the wife of the decedent and is the beneficiary who was designated by him as stated in her application for benefits.

2. That the decedent, James R. Scannell, was a *527policeman employed by the Chicago Police Department and engaged in the active performance of his duties, within the meaning of Sec. 2(c) of the Act, on July 2, 1972.

3. That on said date, Officer Scannell died after physically apprehending an escaping, violent prisoner, previously arrested by the officer. Officer Scannell died at the scene of the occurrence, shortly after returning the prisoner to a police department squadron. The death certificate recites the cause of death as myocardial infarction.

4. That Officer Scannell was killed in the line of duty as defined in Sec. 2(c) of the Act.

5. That the proof submitted in support of this claim satisfied all of the requirements of the Act, and the claim is therefore compensable thereunder.

It Is Hereby Ordered that the sum of $10,000.00 (Ten Thousand Dollars) be awarded to Mildred Scannell as wife and designated beneficiary of the deceased police officer, James R. Scannell.
PUBLIC LAW 114–225—SEPT. 29, 2016 130 STAT. 925 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5252: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

July 11, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 20, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–225 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the United States Customs and Border Protection Port of Entry located 

at 1400 Lower Island Road in Tornillo, Texas, as the ‘‘Marcelino Serna Port 

of Entry’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. MARCELINO SERNA PORT OF ENTRY. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The United States Customs and Border 

Protection Port of Entry located at 1400 Lower Island Road in 

Tornillo, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Marcelino 

Serna Port of Entry’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the port 

of entry referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a 

reference to the ‘‘Marcelino Serna Port of Entry’’. 

Approved September 29, 2016. 

Sept. 29, 2016 

[H.R. 5252] 


kgrant on DSKB33CYQ1 with PUBLAW
§ 1200.61 Fiscal year 2013 Section 405 grants. ( a ) For fiscal year 2013 grants authorized under 23 U.S.C. 405(b), (c), (d), (f) and (g), a State shall submit electronically its application as provided in § 1200.11(h) to *NHTSAGrants@dot.gov* no later than March 25, 2013.
( b ) If a State's application contains incomplete information, NHTSA may request additional information from the State prior to making a determination of award for each component of the Section 405 grant program. Failure to respond promptly for request of additional information may result in a State's disqualification from one or more Section 405 grants for fiscal year 2013.
( c ) After reviewing applications and making award determinations, NHTSA shall, in writing, distribute funds available for obligation under Section 405 to qualifying States and specify any conditions or limitations imposed by law on the use of the funds.
( d ) Grant awards are subject to the availability of funds. If there are insufficient funds to award full grant amounts to qualifying States, NHTSA may release interim amounts and release the remainder, up to the State's proportionate share of available funds, when it becomes available in the fiscal year.
( e ) The administration, reconciliation and noncompliance provisions of subparts D through F of this part apply to fiscal year 2013 grants awarded to qualifying States.
EXHIBIT 23



    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


    We consent to the incorporation by reference in
    Idaho Power Company's Registration Statement No. 33-
    51215 on Form S-3 and IDACORP, Inc's Registration
    Statement Nos. 333-00139 and 333-64737 on Form S-3
    and Registration Statement Nos. 33-56071, 333-89445
    and 333-65157 on Form S-8 of our reports dated
    January 31, 2000 on IDACORP, Inc. and Idaho Power
    Company, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-
    K of IDACORP, Inc. and Idaho Power Company for the
    year ended December 31, 1999.





    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

    Boise, Idaho
    March 20, 2000
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Cristóbal Conde

Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.(S) 1350, as adopted), I, Cristóbal Conde, Chief Executive Officer of SunGard Data Systems Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
that to my knowledge:

1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the Periodic Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information
contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Dated: March 5, 2009   
|                       
|/s/ Cristóbal Conde    
|Cristóbal Conde        
|Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
SunGard Data Systems Inc. and will be retained by SunGard Data Systems Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 861

 898

 912

 912

 900

 874

 867

 851

 831

 823

 857

 866

 857

 860

 838

 785

 807

 842

 860

 898

 887

 768

 935

 856

 868

 847

 865

 850

 866

 810

 865

 899

 901

 870

 868

 849

 827

 824

 781

 799

 771

 771

 834

 735

 684

 675

 586

 549

 518

 501

 474

 477

 480

 461

 453

 418

 410

 415

 827

 888

 905

 906

 883

 871

 857

 842

 827

 797

 825

 832

 803

 847

 803

 753

 750

 723

 682

 667

 649

 588

 625

 659

 647

 611

 568

 552

 590

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 3, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 527

 565

 575

 576

 562

 554

 546

 536

 527

 509

 526

 530

 512

 539

 512

 481

 480

 463

 437

 428

 417

 379

 402

 423

 416

 394

 367

 357

 381

TOTAL 21,777

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
### §3573. Petition of the Government for modification or remission

Upon petition of the Government showing that reasonable efforts to collect a fine or assessment are not likely to be effective, the court may, in the interest of justice—

(1) remit all or part of the unpaid portion of the fine or special assessment, including interest and penalties;

(2) defer payment of the fine or special assessment to a date certain or pursuant to an installment schedule; or

(3) extend a date certain or an installment schedule previously ordered.

A petition under this subsection shall be filed in the court in which sentence was originally imposed, unless the court transfers jurisdiction to another court. This section shall apply to all fines and assessments irrespective of the date of imposition.

(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §212(a)(2), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1997; amended Pub. L. 100–185, §8(a), Dec. 11, 1987, 101 Stat. 1282; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7082(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4407.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

For a prior section 3573, applicable to offenses committed prior to Nov. 1, 1987, see note set out preceding section 3551 of this title.

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–690 inserted at end "This section shall apply to all fines and assessments irrespective of the date of imposition."

1987—Pub. L. 100–185 substituted "Petition of the Government for modification or remission" for "Modification or remission of fine" in section catchline and amended text generally, revising and restating as a single paragraph with three numbered clauses provisions formerly contained in subsecs. (a) and (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Nov. 1, 1987, and applicable only to offenses committed after the taking effect of this section, see section 235(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as a note under section 3551 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5052 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5052

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to include local government 
   minimum wage requirements in determining the hourly minimum wage 
     applicable for purposes of the work-study allowance under the 
   educational assistance programs administered by the Secretary of 
                           Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 12, 2019

    Mr. Lujan (for himself, Mr. Gomez, Mr. Young, Ms. Jayapal, Mr. 
   Lipinski, Ms. Norton, Mr. Raskin, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mr. Smith of 
    Washington, Ms. Velazquez, Ms. Jackson Lee, and Ms. Schakowsky) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to include local government 
   minimum wage requirements in determining the hourly minimum wage 
     applicable for purposes of the work-study allowance under the 
   educational assistance programs administered by the Secretary of 
                           Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Wage Adjustment for Veterans 
Enrolled in School Act'' or the ``WAVES Act''.

SEC. 2. AMOUNT OF WORK-STUDY ALLOWANCE UNDER DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (6) of section 3485(a) of title 38, 
United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
            ``(6) For the purposes of this subsection and subsection 
        (e), the term `applicable hourly minimum wages' means the 
        higher of the following wages:
                    ``(A) The hourly minimum wage under section 6(a) of 
                the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 
                206(a)).
                    ``(B) The hourly minimum wage under comparable law 
                of the State in which the services are to be performed.
                    ``(C) The hourly minimum wage under comparable law 
                of the local government with jurisdiction over the area 
                in which the services are to be performed.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to a payment of work-study allowance made on or 
after January 1, 2021.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 4,725

 4,842

 5,126

 5,236

 5,026

 4,397

 4,844

 6,046

 8,001

 8,910

 9,476

 10,595

 8,877

 8,137

 7,022

 6,017

 5,959

 4,914

 5,733

 7,122

 8,882

 10,112

 10,622

 11,594

 10,395

 10,760

 11,773

 12,570

 12,172

 10,757

 9,863

 257

 267

 350

 414

 586

 852

 976

 832

 824

 1,276

 1,156

 854

 1,612

 1,194

 1,019

 907

 1,046

 965

 1,157

 2,027

 1,955

 1,851

 2,097

 2,488

 2,624

 2,232

 1,442

 1,626

 2,331

 3,435

 3,020

 2,046

 1,902

 2,180

 2,324

 2,443

 2,527

 2,650

 2,938

 3,603

 4,508

 4,335

 5,074

 5,325

 4,527

 3,675

 3,425

 3,377

 3,076

 3,307

 3,945

 4,713

 5,254

 5,926

 6,475

 6,301

 5,894

 5,946

 6,631

 7,529

 7,150

 6,351

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 3, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### § 103.1 [Reserved]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 550

 574

 552

 556

 568

 571

 705

 696

 718

 725

 717

 584

 558

 591

 611

 607

 591

 587

 572

 495

 530

 547

 552

 534

 513

 518

 538

 525

 488

 480

 453

 467

 416

 405

 395

 496

 569

 528

 515

 480

 466

 465

 466

 473

 460

 452

 454

 443

 457

 469

 482

 475

 493

 496

 511

 491

 513

 510

 509

 515

 476

 465

 457

 566

 619

 606

 594

 530

 498

 502

 499

 517

 488

 486

 475

 459

 474

 486

 501

 499

 503

 503

 528

 505

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2022 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 1, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 333

 331

 331

 334

 310

 303

 298

 366

 399

 391

 383

 344

 324

 326

 324

 336

 318

 316

 310

 300

 309

 316

 326

 324

 327

 327

 342

 328

TOTAL 14,283

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Richmond Division 

IN RE: MICHAEL ROBERT DICKINSON, Case No. 18-34024-KRH

 Chapter 13 

Debtor. 

ORDER

 

On August 8, 2018, Michael Robert Dickinson (the “Debtor”) filed a petition under 

chapter 13 of title 11 of the United States Code. On October 31, 2018, the Debtor filed an 

objection (the “Claim Objection”) [ECF 25] to the amended proof of claim, Claim No. 2-2, filed 

by Samuel J.T. Moore, III (“Moore”), a pro se creditor. Moore filed a letter responding to the 

Claim Objection [ECF 34] and also filed another amended proof of claim, Claim No. 2-3. On 

January 2, 2019, the Court held a hearing on the Claim Objection (the “Hearing”). For the 

reasons stated at the Hearing, it is

ORDERED that on or before January 16, 2019, Moore shall file an amended proof of 

claim, together with all necessary supporting documentation as set forth by the Court at the 

Hearing. 

ENTERED: January 3, 2019 

 /s/ Kevin R. Huennekens 

 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

Copies to: 

Michael Robert Dickinson 

3717 Patterson Avenue 

Richmond, VA 23221 

Entered on Docket: January 3, 2019

Case 18-34024-KRH Doc 51 Filed 01/03/19 Entered 01/03/19 10:43:38 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
2 

Sharon Choi Stuart 

Stuart Law Firm, LLC 

2222 Monument Avenue 

Richmond, VA 23220

Samuel J.T. Moore, III

1011 West Grace Street

Richmond, VA 23220

Carl M. Bates 

P. O. Box 1819 

Richmond, VA 23218

John P. Fitzgerald, III 

Office of the US Trustee - Region 4 -R

701 E. Broad Street, Ste. 4304 

Richmond, VA 23219

Case 18-34024-KRH Doc 51 Filed 01/03/19 Entered 01/03/19 10:43:38 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2