alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(No. 74-CC-522

#### Univ. of Chicago — Center for Continuing Education, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 13, 1974.*

*397University of Chicago — Center for Continuing Education, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       795,741,956
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                  29,475,901
<MORTGAGE>                                 339,773,729
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                           1,266,787,088
<CASH>                                       3,086,602
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      99,246,423
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,403,354,824
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            672,301,481
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         26,248,702
<POLICY-OTHER>                              10,819,728
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                       71,450,993
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,449,722
<OTHER-SE>                                 536,637,856
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,403,354,824
<PREMIUMS>                                 114,046,708
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         87,968,639
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              71,434
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                  92,791,862
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                 12,369,247
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        38,876,410
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             58,049,262
<INCOME-TAX>                                20,150,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         37,899,262
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                37,899,262
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.16
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

RICHMOND DIVISION

In Re: Kishau N Rogers CASE NO. 17-32285-KLP

Chapter 13

)

)

13017 Trinity Court

Henrico, VA 23233

Debtor Address(es):

Last four digits of Social Security No(s).: 5271

MOTION TO DISMISS, NOTICE OF MOTION AND NOTICE OF THE HEARING

NOW COMES the Chapter 13 Trustee and moves this Court to dismiss this case as provided 

in 11 U.S.C. 1307(c)(6) as the Debtor(s) are in default in making the payments under the plan.

Carl M. Bates, Chapter 13 Trustee, has filed papers with the court to dismiss this case.

Your rights may be affected. You should read these papers carefully and discuss them 

with your attorney, if you have one in this bankruptcy case. (If you do not have an attorney, 

you may wish to consult one.)

If you do not want the court to grant the relief sought in the motion, or if you want the court to 

consider your views on the motion, then on or before seven (7) days before the date of the hearing, you 

or your attorney must:

 X File with the court, at the address shown below, a written request for a hearing [or a written 

response pursuant to Local Bankruptcy Rule 9013-1(H)]. If you mail your request for hearing (or 

response) to the court for filing, you must mail it early enough so the court will receive it on or before 

the date stated above.

Clerk of Court

United States Bankruptcy Court

701 East Broad Street, Suite 4000

Richmond, VA 23219

Carl M. Bates

Chapter 13 Trustee

P.O. Box 1819

Richmond, VA 23218

(804)237-6800

VSBN 27815

Case 17-32285-KLP Doc 33 Filed 11/30/18 Entered 11/30/18 11:19:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
You must also mail a copy to:

Carl M. Bates, Chapter 13 Trustee

Chapter 13 Trustee

P.O. Box 1819

Richmond, VA 23218

 _ Attend a hearing to be scheduled at a later date. You will receive separate notice of hearing. If 

no timely response has been filed opposing the relief requested, the court may grant the relief 

without holding a hearing.

 X Attend the hearing on the motion scheduled to be held on January 02, 2019 at 9:00 AM at 

United States Bankruptcy Court, 701 East Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23219, Room 5100.

If you or your attorney do not take these steps, the court may decide that you do not oppose 

the relief sought in the motion and may enter an order granting that relief.

Dated: November 30, 2018 /s/ Carl M. Bates

Carl M. Bates

Chapter 13 Trustee

P.O. Box 1819

Richmond, VA 23218

VSBN 27815

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that I have this 30th day of November, 2018, by mail, hand or electronically delivered 

a true copy of the foregoing Notice of Motion and Motion to the debtor(s) Kishau N Rogers, 13017 

Trinity Court, Henrico, VA 23233 and debtor(s) attorney, MARTIN C. CONWAY, ESQUIRE, 

via e-mail: mconway@conwaylawpc.com.

/s/ Carl M. Bates

Carl M. Bates

Chapter 13 Trustee

Carl M. Bates

Chapter 13 Trustee

P.O. Box 1819

Richmond, VA 23218

(804)237-6800

VSBN 27815

Case 17-32285-KLP Doc 33 Filed 11/30/18 Entered 11/30/18 11:19:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6315

CHEVY RAMAT SHIVAEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus E. M. CUBE, M.D., Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-98-780-7) Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 7, 2001Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chevy Ramat Shivaee, Appellant Pro Se. George W. Wooten, Peter Duane Vieth, WOOTEN & HART, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Chevy Ramat Shivaee appeals the district court’s order denyinghis Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reconsider a prior order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Shivaee v. Cube , No. CA-98-780-7 (W.D. Va. Feb. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 437

 383

 352

 354

 358

 373

 384

 367

 365

 360

 367

 395

 388

 392

 388

 374

 406

 406

 451

 445

 460

 424

 442

 459

 446

 484

 487

 489

 481

 497

 466

 337

 327

 325

 320

 322

 324

 321

 334

 334

 325

 320

 319

 317

 316

 317

 318

 330

 337

 364

 375

 378

 373

 383

 391

 390

 392

 392

 390

 391

 394

 400

 374

 349

 338

 334

 334

 338

 343

 350

 351

 345

 344

 339

 338

 340

 338

 332

 356

 367

 388

 402

 405

 396

 411

 415

 409

 422

 420

 421

 421

 432

 424

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 2, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 247

 232

 225

 222

 222

 225

 228

 232

 233

 229

 229

 226

 225

 226

 225

 221

 236

 243

 256

 264

 266

 261

 270

 272

 269

 277

 276

 276

 276

 283

 278

TOTAL 11,576

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
### §3527. Additional authority of Attorney General

The Attorney General may enter into such contracts or other agreements as may be necessary to carry out this chapter. Any such contract or agreement which would result in the United States being obligated to make outlays may be entered into only to the extent and in such amount as may be provided in advance in an appropriation Act.

(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §1208, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2163.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1984, see section 1210 of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as a note under section 3521 of this title.
386 P.2d 237

#### Eustacio G. DURAN, Administrator of the Estate of Noel Duran, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRANSIT REMANUFACTURING CORPORATION, and John Doe, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 7290.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Oct. 28, 1963.

See also N.M., 386 P.2d 238.

*140Matteucci, Gutierrez & Franchini, Albuquerque, for appellant.

Iden & Johnson, Albuquerque, for appellees.

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff, administrator of the estate of Noel Duran, deceased, brought this action to recover damages for the wrongful death of the deceased, allegedly resulting from the negligence of the defendant; and, in an alternative cause of action, he sought to recover compensation under the provisions of New Mexico Workmen’s Compensation Act.

The complaint, filed May 18, 1961, alleged that Noel Duran was fatally injured as a result of defendant’s negligence April 4, 1961. The answer pleaded various defenses, the third defense being that the employer was a self-insurer by virtue of a certificate theretofore issued by the Honorable M. Ralph Brown, Judge of the District Court of Bernalillo County, dated November 26, 1954. From an ox'der denying the plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the third defense, the plaintiff has appealed.

The appellant contends that the certificate had terminated by virtue of the order of the court, thus permitting the action in tort. On the other hand, appellee contends that its status as self-insurer once determined remains unchanged by virtue of the statute.

We notice our jurisdiction at the outset. The order denying the motion to dismiss the third defense falls far short of disposing of the merits of the action so that any further proceeding therein would be only to carry into effect, such order; hence, the order is not appealable. Section 21-2-1(5) (2), 1953 Comp. The effect of the order is to permit the third defense to stand, the issue raised thereby to be determined at a trial. Davis v. Meadors-Cherry Company, 63 N.M. 285, 317 P.2d 901; Marr v. Nagel, 58 N.M. 479, 272 P.2d 681; Foster v. Addington, 48 N.M. 212, 148 P.2d 373; Miller v. Montano, 48 N.M. 78, 146 P.2d 172; Burns v. Fleming, 48 N.M. 40, 145 P.2d 861; Wanser v. Fuqua, 46 N.M. 217, 126 P.2d 20; Winans v. Bryan, 33 N.M. 532, 271 P. 469.

*141 We should mention that no motion has been made to dismiss the appeal although our jurisdiction is questioned by appellee. Counsel consent, however, that we may dispose of the appeal on the merits but where jurisdiction does not exist we cannot do so. Nor can jurisdiction be conferred by consent of the parties where none exists. Foster v. Addington, supra, Wanser v. Fuqua, supra.

The appeal must be dismissed. It is so ordered.

NOBLE and MOISE, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

_________________________________________ )

JULIUS WAYNE MILLER

, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Case No. 17

- cv

- 1619 (APM)

)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., )

)

Defendant s

. )

_________________________________________ )

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, ECF No. 31, the

District of Columbia and Warden Lennard Johnson’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 11, is granted;

the Federal Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 22, is granted; and this action is dismissed

with prejudice

.

This is a final, appealable order.

Dated: August 3 , 2018 Amit P. Mehta

United States District Judge
§ 30.35 What procedures does the Secretary follow to report debts to consumer reporting agencies? ( a ) ( 1 ) The Secretary reports information regarding debts arising under a program or activity of the Department and held by the Department to consumer reporting agencies, in accordance with the procedures described in this section.
( 2 ) The term *consumer reporting agency,* as used in this section, has the same meaning as provided in 31 U.S.C. 3701(a)(3).
( b ) Before reporting information on a debt to a consumer reporting agency, the Secretary follows the procedures set forth in § 30.33.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3(a)(1) and 1226a-1, 31 U.S.C. 3711, § 16023, 16029, Pub. L. 99-272)
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The undersigned hereby certifies, in
her capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Sabre Industrial, Inc. (the
“Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of her
knowledge:





(1)
 The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated:  November
15, 2010





/s/
Dingyou Zhang





Name:
Dingyou Zhang


Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer


(principal
executive officer)




This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1. Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)   We, Kim Boyce, Chief Executive Officer, and David Strate, Principal Accounting Officer, of Reflect Scientific, Inc. (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period June 30, 2009 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Dated:  August 14, 2009 By:  /s/ Kim Boyce  Kim Boyce  Chief Executive Officer  By:  /s/  David Strate David Strate, Principal Accounting Officer  * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Reflect Scientific, Inc. and will be retained by Reflect Scientific, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 63 (Friday, April 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 18220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7754]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Advisory Council for the Elimination of Tuberculosis; Notice of 
Charter Renewal

    This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Advisory Council for the 
Elimination of Tuberculosis, Department of Health and Human Services, 
has been renewed for a 2-year period through March 15, 2013.
    For information, contact Hazel Dean, Sc.D., M.P.H., Designated 
Federal Officer, Advisory Council for the Elimination of Tuberculosis, 
Department of Health and Human Services, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., 
Mailstop E-10, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, telephone 404/639-8000 or fax 
404/639-8600.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: March 25, 2011.
Andre Tyler,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2011-7754 Filed 3-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 647

 624

 512

 385

 391

 382

 374

 388

 418

 407

 422

 397

 355

 352

 359

 377

 361

 346

 376

 376

 471

 425

 326

 268

 307

 325

 329

 0

 0

 0

 0

 409

 449

 356

 344

 331

 329

 312

 297

 287

 281

 288

 289

 324

 310

 327

 333

 301

 299

 288

 315

 273

 230

 221

 245

 270

 281

 275

 0

 0

 0

 0

 567

 554

 402

 362

 356

 348

 334

 333

 320

 332

 349

 356

 344

 331

 342

 358

 334

 316

 323

 348

 330

 283

 252

 260

 289

 300

 312

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2022 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:February 1, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 0

 0

 0

 0

 366

 358

 264

 240

 236

 231

 222

 222

 214

 221

 232

 236

 229

 221

 227

 237

 222

 211

 216

 231

 220

 191

 172

 177

 195

 201

 209

TOTAL 9,335

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
§ 642.20 How does the Secretary evaluate an application for a new award? ( a ) The Secretary evaluates an application on the basis of the criteria in § 642.21. ( 1 ) The Secretary awards up to 75 points for these criteria.
( 2 ) The maximum possible score for each complete criterion is indicated in the parentheses next to the heading of that criterion.
( b ) In addition, for an applicant who is conducting a Training program in the fiscal year immediately prior to the fiscal year for which the applicant is applying, the Secretary evaluates the applicant's prior experience (PE) of high quality service delivery, as provided in § 642.22, based on the applicant's performance during the first project year of that expiring Training program grant.
( c ) The Secretary selects applications for funding within each specific absolute priority established for the competition in rank order on the basis of the score received by the application in the peer review process.
( d ) Within each specific absolute priority, if there are insufficient funds to fund all applications at the next peer review score, the Secretary adds the PE points awarded under § 642.22 to the peer review score to determine an adjusted total score for those applications. The Secretary makes awards at the next peer review score to the applications that have the highest total adjusted score.
( e ) In the event a tie score still exists, the Secretary will select for funding the applicant that has the greatest capacity to provide training to eligible participants in all regions of the Nation, consistent with § 642.23.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070d, 1070d-1d)
[47 FR 17788, Apr. 23, 1982.Redesignated and amended at 75 FR 65772, Oct. 26, 2010]
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 23

- 1201

_____________________________
J OSEPH A COFF , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. Brantley S. Clark, Jr. , Judge

. May 10, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , R OWE , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Joseph Acoff, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary  information from the Financial  Statements of the
December 31, 1997 Form 10-K of Resources Pension Shares 5, L.P. and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      15,725,616
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,112,356
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,793,253
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,733,753
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  48,451,062
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,793,253
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,335,050
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,789,289
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (487,687)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,033,448
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,033,448
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,033,448
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
         

</TABLE>