alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 (a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Charles W. Berger, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterlyperiod ended March 31, 2004, of Nuance Communications, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report, as amended, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, as amended, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

 

Date: November 8, 2004
EGU MACT RIA -- Interagency comments on Executive Summary

12/14/2011 04:19 PM

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Hi Bob,

Attached are interagency comments on the RIA Executive Summary.

Regards,

Cortney

Executive Summary_InteragencycommentsunderEO13563.docx
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, William Dwyer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Raser Technology, Inc., (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.

5. The Registrants other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                 |  |  |  |                        
|---------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|November 9, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ William Dwyer      
|(Date)           |  |  |  | William Dwyer,         
|                 |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 930

 976

 918

 962

 970

 1,033

 996

 1,054

 1,065

 1,012

 1,132

 1,144

 1,063

 990

 1,066

 1,027

 921

 958

 951

 851

 769

 860

 900

 983

 1,186

 1,239

 1,140

 1,280

 1,257

 1,066

 1,030

 803

 858

 769

 815

 761

 684

 673

 751

 686

 750

 791

 838

 798

 733

 904

 776

 755

 930

 858

 763

 758

 816

 862

 902

 990

 1,148

 993

 1,005

 1,054

 1,033

 1,002

 868

 924

 845

 897

 852

 859

 786

 955

 880

 831

 942

 988

 939

 886

 985

 909

 832

 949

 921

 798

 761

 841

 885

 932

 1,080

 1,212

 1,047

 1,171

 1,151

 1,053

 1,014

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 18, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 552

 587

 538

 570

 543

 547

 502

 606

 560

 530

 598

 627

 596

 564

 625

 578

 530

 602

 585

 509

 486

 536

 563

 592

 683

 765

 663

 740

 727

 667

 643

TOTAL 28,993

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
Chief Financial Officer of HM Publishing Corp. and Houghton Mifflin Company (together, the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) | the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    STEPHEN C.
RICHARDSStephen C. Richards Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, and Chief Financial
Officer




Date: March 30, 2006



A signed original of this written statement, required by Section 906, has
been provided to HM Publishing Corp. and Houghton Mifflin Company and will be retained by HM Publishing Corp. and Houghton Mifflin Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §6302. Definitions

In this chapter:

#### (1) CITES

The term "CITES" means the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, done at Washington March 3, 1973 (27 UST 1087; TIAS 8249), including its appendices.

#### (2) Conservation

The term "conservation"—

(A) means the use of methods and procedures necessary to prevent the diminution of, and to sustain viable populations of, a species; and

(B) includes all activities associated with wildlife management, such as—

(i) conservation, protection, restoration, acquisition, and management of habitat;

(ii) in-situ research and monitoring of populations and habitats;

(iii) assistance in the development, implementation, and improvement of management plans for managed habitat ranges;

(iv) enforcement and implementation of CITES;

(v) enforcement and implementation of domestic laws relating to resource management;

(vi) development and operation of sanctuaries for members of a species rescued from the illegal trade in live animals;

(vii) training of local law enforcement officials in the interdiction and prevention of the illegal killing of great apes;

(viii) programs for the rehabilitation of members of a species in the wild and release of the members into the wild in ways which do not threaten existing wildlife populations by causing displacement or the introduction of disease;

(ix) conflict resolution initiatives;

(x) community outreach and education; and

(xi) strengthening the capacity of local communities to implement conservation programs.

#### (3) Fund

The term "Fund" means the Great Ape Conservation Fund established by section 6304 of this title.

#### (4) Great ape

The term "great ape" means a chimpanzee, gorilla, bonobo, orangutan, or gibbon.

#### (5) Multinational Species Conservation Fund

The term "Multinational Species Conservation Fund" means such fund as established in title I of the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999, under the heading "multinational species conservation fund" [16 U.S.C. 4246].

#### (6) Secretary

The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Interior.

(Pub. L. 106–411, §3, Nov. 1, 2000, 114 Stat. 1790.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Title I of the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999, referred to in par. (5), is Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(e) [title I], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–231, 2681–232. Provisions under the heading "multinational species conservation fund" in Pub. L. 105–277, §101(e) [title I] appear at 112 Stat. 2681–237, and are classified in part to section 4246 of this title.
### §835m. Recommendations for changes in limitations on financial assistance; time and frequency of submission

On December 20, 1974, and thereafter at intervals coinciding with anniversary dates of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission general review of the rates and charges of the Bonneville Power Administration, the Secretary of the Interior shall recommend to the Congress any changes in the dollar limitations herein placed upon financial assistance to Pacific Northwest reclamation projects that he believes justified by changes in the cost-price levels existing on July 1, 1966, or by other relevant changes of circumstances.

(Pub. L. 89–448, §2(c), as added Pub. L. 89–561, §6(3), Sept. 7, 1966, 80 Stat. 715; amended Pub. L. 95–91, title IV, §402(a)(1)(B), Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 583.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of subsec. (c) of section 2 of Pub. L. 89–448, as added by Pub. L. 89–561. Subsecs. (a) and (b) of section 2 are classified to sections 835j and 835k, and 835l of this title, respectively.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Federal Energy Regulatory Commission" substituted in text for "Federal Power Commission" pursuant to Pub. L. 95–91, §402(a)(1)(B), which is classified to section 7172(a)(1)(B) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

The Federal Power Commission was terminated, and its functions, personnel, property, funds, etc., were transferred to the Secretary of Energy (except for certain functions which were transferred to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) by sections 7151(b), 7171(a), 7172(a), 7291, and 7293 of Title 42.

Functions of Secretary of the Interior with respect to Bonneville Power Administration transferred to Secretary of Energy by section 7152(a)(1)(D), (2) of Title 42, with Bonneville Power Administration to be preserved as a distinct organizational entity within Department of Energy and headed by an Administrator.
### §556e. Emergency appropriations for rehabilitation and wildfire suppression

Beginning in fiscal year 1993, and in each year thereafter, only amounts for emergency rehabilitation and wildfire suppression activities that are in excess of the average of such costs for the previous ten years shall be considered "emergency requirements" pursuant to section 901(b)(2)(D) 1 of title 2, and such amounts shall on and after November 13, 1991, be so designated.

(Pub. L. 102–154, title II, Nov. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1015.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 901 of title 2, referred to in text, was amended, and as so amended, section 901(b)(2)(D) no longer refers to "emergency requirements". However, "emergency requirements" are referred to elsewhere in section 901.

1 See References in Text note below.
#### § 15.1 Uniform relocation assistance and real property acquisition.

Regulations and procedures for complying with the Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1970 (Pub. L. 91-646, 84 Stat. 1894, 42 U.S.C. 4601) as amended by the SUrface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987 (Title IV of Pub. L. 100-17, 101 Stat. 264-255, 42 U.S.C. 4601 note) are set forth in 49 CFR part 24.

[52 FR 48021, Dec. 17, 1987]
[No. 8570.

Department Two.

February 25, 1910.]

#### J. H. Morrisey, *Appellant,*v. Otto Strom, Respondent.1

Specific Performance — Defendant’s Ownership of Land- — Pleadings. A complaint in an action to enforce the specific performance of a contract to convey land must allege that the defendant was the owner of the property either at the time the contract was made or at the time of the commencement of the action.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Adams county, Holcomb, J., entered August 17, 1909, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action for specific performance.

Affirmed.

*A. C. Shaw,*for appellant.

*Lovell*$ *Davis,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 107 Pac. 191.

Rudkin, C. J.

This was an action to enforce the specific performance of a contract to convey real property. The *488court sustained a demurrer to the complaint, and the plaintiff electing to stand on his pleading and refusing to plead further, a judgment of dismissal was entered, from which this appeal is prosecuted. The failure of the complaint to allege that the respondent was the owner of the real property at the date of the agreement to convey or at the time of the commencement of the action is the particular ground upon which the demurrer was sustained.

We have but little sympathy with appeals of this character. If the respondent was not in fact the owner of the property and could not perform his contract, the appellant had no right of action for specific performance. *Morgan v. Bell,*3 Wash. 554, 28 Pac. 925, 16 L. R. A. 614. If, on the other hand, the respondent had title and was able to perform his contract, it was an easy matter to obviate the ruling of the court by amendment, whether the ruling was right or wrong. However, the appellant had a legal right to stand on his complaint, and if the complaint states a cause of action, the judgment must be reversed. Decisions on the question thus presented are few in number, for the reason, doubtless, that complaints in such actions almost invariably contain an allegation of ownership in the defendant, either at the time of the execution of the agreement to convey or at the time of the commencement of the action. In vol. 20 of the Ency. of Plead. & Prac., at page 451, the rule is thus stated:

“A bill to enforce the specific performance of a contract to sell to the complainant must aver the defendant’s ownership of the property at the time when the contract was made.”

This rule seems to be sustained by the authorities cited. See, also, *Manton v. Ray,*18 R. I. 672, 29 Atl. 998, 49 Am. St. 811. Our own decisions assume that such an allegation is necessary. *Hankie v. Denison,*34 Wash. 51, 74 Pac. 822; *Newell*v. *Lamping,*45 Wash. 304, 88 Pac. 195.

The judgment of the court below is therefore affirmed.

Parker, Mount, Crow, and Dunbar, JJ., concur.
0506 

0506 

99 

050112 

99 

050119 

050119b 

050119a 

050118 

050118 

050114 

0504 

0506 

0506 

050112 

05 01 12 a 

100 

100c 

132 

133 

13 6 

12 8 

62b 

62a 

112 

63 

63 

0507 

65 

103 

10 3 

10 4a 

050124 

0507 

050117 

050117 

05 01 17 

050124 

050124 

0507a 

0507a 

126 

83 

110 

110 

83a 

85 

85 

85 

125 

137 

05 01 22 

12 6 

0503 

81 

90 

91 

90 

82a 

050112 

050115a 

81 

050115 

76 

0502 

050126T 

0503a 

0503a 

Ophir Creek Rd 

Blossburg Rd 

Marysville Road 

Long Gulch Rd 

Lit tle Prickly Pear Rd 

Empire Creek Rd 

05 01 09 a 

0507a 

050118a 

0504 

Long Gulch Rd 

050126T 

Lake Rd 

Marsh Creek Rd 

Ottawa Gulch Rd 

Ottawa Gulch Rd 

Drumlummon Hil l

83 

130

65b 

0507 

65 

0506 

99 

66 

75 

58 

61 

050117 

97 

89 

62 

050112 

59 

050115a 

81 

83 

86 

64 

0503 

10 

88 

0504 

050109 

82 

57 

72 

60 

84 

050116 

92 

122 

050110 

62a 

96 

98 

77 

70 

0502 

050111 

103a 

74 

131 

106 

68 

87 

73 

109 

050121 

94 

050113 

95 

050122 

96a 

115 

78 

10 3 

050120 

050125

105 

94a 

93 

113 

71 

119 

102 

10 0d 

75a 

129 

114 

123 

118 

120 

100a 

134 

107 

124 

85a 

10 4 

050112 

0507a 

0502 

82b

050110a 

050115

05 03 

85 

83 

67 

82b 

050119

75 

95

050124 

59 

10 3 

050122 

58

0503 

85

81 

68 

85

0507a

050115a 

050109 

85 

050112 

050115a 

36 31 36 31 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

Gravelly 

Range Lake 

Butte Field Office 

6 

1 6 

1 

Butte Field Office
 

Draft RMP/EIS
 

Lewis & Clark County NW
 

Travel Plan Route Designations
 

Under Alternative A
 

Miles 56 

0 25 50 100 

105a 

279 

75 

72 

Trinity
 

Hill
 

67 

Edward
 

Mountain
 

121 

121 Empire 

Mine 

31 

79 Marysville

36 31 

80 111 36 

Mt
 

Belmont
 

135 

Map Shows Alternative A for the
 

Marysville Locality of the Lewis &
 93 

6 

91 

91b 91a

Clark County NW Travel Plan Area
 1 

91b 

92 

6 

1

BLM Routes Land Ownership 

Open Yearlong Bureau of Land Management (BLM) 

Closed 12/2 to 5/15 Private 

Closed Yearlong State 

Snowmobiles Only 

US Forest Service (USFS) Other Routes 

100

Water Non-BLM Route 100b 

County Access Route Area Closed to All Snowmobile Use
 

Forest Service Route Travel Plan Area Boundary 

State Highway
 Contour Interval is 100 feet
 

Roundtop
 

Mountain
 Bald 

Butte 

Unless otherwise managed, BLM lands within the Lewis and Clark TPA are open 

to cross country snowmobile travel 

Albers Equal Area NAD83 Projection 

Miles 

0 0.5 1 2 

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of 

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data 

for individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by 

BLM. This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product 

was developed through digital means and information may be updated without 

notification. 

February 2007
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 624

 587

 530

 527

 551

 612

 611

 582

 593

 590

 533

 658

 626

 536

 547

 551

 556

 556

 535

 562

 614

 565

 613

 604

 642

 640

 528

 648

 558

 497

 484

 393

 417

 402

 404

 395

 393

 391

 408

 426

 386

 369

 456

 409

 447

 459

 469

 463

 438

 442

 469

 447

 459

 446

 443

 468

 443

 448

 472

 443

 413

 430

 465

 476

 465

 468

 472

 475

 461

 457

 478

 483

 432

 537

 484

 495

 506

 515

 526

 505

 500

 503

 513

 499

 496

 492

 517

 520

 475

 548

 493

 447

 462

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 3, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 303

 310

 303

 305

 308

 310

 301

 298

 311

 314

 283

 348

 315

 322

 329

 334

 341

 328

 325

 327

 333

 324

 323

 320

 336

 337

 310

 355

 321

 292

 302

TOTAL 15,165

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tyrone Ware, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 558]

Rose, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Herrick, J.), rendered December 15, 2004, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of murder in the second degree.

A report that defendant had killed his girlfriend led police officers to enter and search the apartment that she shared with him, as well as the backyard of the apartment building where they discovered the victim’s body. When police approached defendant to apprehend him, he began crying and apologizing for killing the victim. He was indicted for the crimes of murder in the second degree (three counts), robbery in the first degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree. Following a combined *HuntleyIWade/Mapp*hearing, County Court denied defendant’s motions to suppress his statements to police and evidence found at the apartment. Thereafter, pursuant to a negotiated plea bargain, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of murder in the second degree and waived his right to appeal in exchange for receiving a prison sentence of 20 years to life. Defendant appeals.

We note that defendant does not challenge the voluntariness of the plea or his appeal waiver, and the record confirms that both were knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently made. As a result, his challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence before the grand jury is foreclosed by his guilty plea and his challenges to County Court’s denial of his suppression motions and the severity of his sentence are precluded by his waiver of his right to appeal *(see e.g. People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; *People v Hansen,*95 NY2d 227, 232 [2000]; *People v Kemp,*94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]).

Peters, J.P., Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.