alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 46—FORFEITURE**

Sec.
981.
Civil forfeiture.
982.
Criminal forfeiture.
983.
General rules for civil forfeiture proceedings.
984.
Civil forfeiture of fungible property.
985.
Civil forfeiture of real property.
986.
Subpoenas for bank records.
987.
Anti-terrorist forfeiture protection.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2006**—Pub. L. 109–177, title IV, §406(b)(1)(A), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 244, added item 987.

**2000**—Pub. L. 106–185, §§2(b), 7(b), Apr. 25, 2000, 114 Stat. 210, 215, added items 983 and 985.

**1992**—Pub. L. 102–550, title XV, §§1522(b), 1523(b), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4063, 4064, added items 984 and 986.

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7069, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4405, substituted "forfeiture" for "Forfeiture" in items 981 and 982.
#### Prudential Insurance Company of America, Respondent, v. Ernest Kahn, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
### §1424. Personation or misuse of papers in naturalization proceedings

Whoever, whether as applicant, declarant, petitioner, witness or otherwise, in any naturalization or citizenship proceeding, knowingly personates another or appears falsely in the name of a deceased person or in an assumed or fictitious name; or

Whoever knowingly and unlawfully uses or attempts to use, as showing naturalization or citizenship of any person, any order, certificate, certificate of naturalization, certificate of citizenship, judgment, decree, or exemplification, or copies or duplicates thereof, issued to another person, or in a fictitious name or in the name of a deceased person—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 766; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on subsection (a) pars. (6)(a), (b), (15), (b), (d) of section 746 of title 8, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Aliens and Nationality (Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 876, §346(a), pars. (6), (15), (b), (d), 54 Stat. 1164, 1165, 1167).

Section consolidates, with minor verbal changes, subsections (a), pars. (6)(a), (b), (15), (b), (d), and the general punishment provision of section 746 of title 8, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Aliens and Nationality.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000" in last par.
### §2275. Firing or tampering with vessels

Whoever sets fire to any vessel of foreign registry, or any vessel of American registry entitled to engage in commerce with foreign nations, or to any vessel of the United States, or to the cargo of the same, or tampers with the motive power of instrumentalities of navigation of such vessel, or places bombs or explosives in or upon such vessel, or does any other act to or upon such vessel while within the jurisdiction of the United States, or, if such vessel is of American registry, while she is on the high sea, with intent to injure or endanger the safety of the vessel or of her cargo, or of persons on board, whether the injury or danger is so intended to take place within the jurisdiction of the United States, or after the vessel shall have departed therefrom and whoever attempts to do so shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 804; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §502 (June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title III, §1, 40 Stat. 221).

Words "as defined in section 501 of this title," were omitted in view of section 9 of this title, defining vessel of the United States.

Last sentence of said section 502, defining "United States", was incorporated in section 5 of this title.

Provision prohibiting conspiracy was deleted as adequately covered by the general conspiracy statute, section 371 of this title.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $10,000".
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 948

 904

 932

 983

 981

 967

 929

 891

 938

 952

 955

 966

 964

 955

 946

 945

 910

 902

 882

 908

 930

 915

 897

 881

 947

 891

 919

 946

 949

 947

 972

 907

 872

 885

 932

 959

 931

 892

 869

 887

 938

 941

 957

 946

 947

 909

 880

 876

 859

 833

 787

 810

 790

 864

 810

 881

 863

 878

 895

 900

 897

 839

 931

 885

 914

 957

 966

 953

 907

 880

 914

 946

 946

 962

 955

 950

 922

 914

 888

 877

 853

 861

 875

 862

 875

 831

 912

 878

 907

 910

 931

 930

 913

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 3, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 591

 563

 581

 607

 613

 605

 577

 560

 581

 601

 601

 611

 606

 603

 586

 581

 565

 558

 543

 548

 557

 549

 557

 530

 580

 559

 577

 578

 591

 591

 580

TOTAL 28,205

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________ No. 96-40370 Summary Calendar

____________________

CARLOS CANALES, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JAMES A. COLLINS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:95-CV-961

________________________________________________________________ August 21, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
Carlos Canales, #611845, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights complaint as frivolous. He argues numerous violations of
his rights to due process and to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. We find no reversible error in the district court’s-2-

analysis. C anales v. Cockrell , No. 6:95cv961 (March 5, 1996). Canales’ motion for injunctive relief is DENIED.

A F F I R M E D.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16444-16445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6751]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLIDT03000-L14300000.EU0000; IDI-36320]


Notice of Realty Action; Extension of Temporary Segregation of 
Public Lands for Proposed Disposal in Blaine County, ID

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of realty action.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice extends the temporary segregation on 2,480 acres 
of public lands in Blaine County, Idaho for up to 2 additional years.

FOR FUTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tara Hagen, Realty Specialist, Bureau 
of Land Management Shoshone Field Office, 400 West F Street, Shoshone, 
Idaho 83352 or by phone at (208) 732-7205.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notification of a 2-year segregation of the 
following described public land from all forms of appropriation under 
the public land laws, including the mining laws, except the sale and 
exchange provisions of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 
1976, appeared in the Federal Register on March 25, 2009 (74 FR 12890):

Boise Meridian

T. 2 S., R. 18 E.,
    Secs. 25 and 26;
    Sec. 27, lots 1 to 8, inclusive, E\1/2\, and E\1/2\W\1/2\;
    Sec. 34, lot 1, N\1/2\NE\1/4\, and NE\1/4\NW\1/4\;
    Sec. 35, E\1/2\, and N\1/2\NW\1/4\.

    The area described contains approximately 2,480 acres in Blaine 
County.
    The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in cooperation with the Federal 
Aviation Administration (FAA) intends to prepare a management framework 
plan amendment and associated environmental impact statement (EIS) to 
consider the location and construction of a replacement airport for the 
Friedman Memorial Airport. This also involves the potential disposal of 
public land in Blaine County, Idaho. The FAA

[[Page 16445]]

has been identified as the lead agency for the replacement airport EIS. 
The BLM is a cooperating agency, as one of the alternative sites occurs 
wholly on public land administered by the BLM. During processing of 
this complex EIS, the FAA has encountered unanticipated delays, 
including the need for additional geotechnical, noise, and water 
studies.
    In accordance with 43 CFR 2711.1-2(d), the BLM Idaho State Director 
has determined that extension of the temporary segregation of the land 
described in this notice is necessary to provide sufficient time to 
complete the final processing steps required to consider these lands 
for disposal. The segregative effect will terminate non issuance of a 
patent, publication in the Federal Register of a termination of the 
segregation, or on March 24, 2013, whichever occurs first.

(Authority: 43 CFR 2711.1-2(d))

Ruth A. Miller,
Shoshone Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 2011-6751 Filed 3-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
905 A.2d 840

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner, v. Adigun S. BAKARE, Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG No. 30,

Sept. Term, 2006.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Aug. 22, 2006.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed here and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 22nd day of August, 2006,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that ADIGUN S. BAKARE, be, and is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Adigun S. Bakare from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Hercules Incorporated 2Q97 10-Q
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          21,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  395,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    238,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               690,000
<PP&E>                                       2,055,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,392,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,498,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          813,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        79,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     784,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,498,000
<SALES>                                        997,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               997,000
<CGS>                                          634,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  958,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                388,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   205,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            183,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   183,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.76


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 129 (Thursday, July 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 39690]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16463]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

State Energy Advisory Board (STEAB)

AGENCY: Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a teleconference call of the State 
Energy Advisory Board (STEAB). The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. 
L. 92-463; 86 Stat.770) requires that public notice of these meetings 
be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Thursday, July 19, 2012 from 3:30 p.m.-4 p.m., EST. To receive 
the call-in number and passcode, please contact the Board's Designated 
Federal Officer (DFO) at the address or phone number listed below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gil Sperling, STEAB Designated Federal 
Officer, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and 
Renewable Energy, 1000 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC, 20585. 
Phone number is (202) 287-1644.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose of the Board: To make recommendations to the Assistant 
Secretary for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 
regarding goals and objectives, programmatic and administrative 
policies, and to otherwise carry out the Board's responsibilities as 
designated in the State Energy Efficiency Programs Improvement Act of 
1990 (Pub. L. 101-440).
    Tentative Agenda: Follow-up on outstanding items from the June 
Board meeting, update the Board on the activities of the STEAB's Task 
Forces, review letters and resolutions transmitted to EERE on behalf of 
the STEAB, and provide an update to the Board on routine business 
matters and other topics of interest.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral statements 
pertaining to agenda items should contact Gil Sperling at the address 
or telephone number listed above. Requests to make oral comments must 
be received five days prior to the meeting; reasonable provision will 
be made to include requested topic(s) on the agenda. The Chair of the 
Board is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will 
facilitate the orderly conduct of business.
    Minutes: The minutes of the meeting will be available for public 
review and copying within 60 days on the STEAB Web site, www.steab.org.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on June 28, 2012.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-16463 Filed 7-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4972 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4972

           For the relief of Ted Simonson and Reoforce, Inc.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 31, 2019

Miss Rice of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           For the relief of Ted Simonson and Reoforce, Inc.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPENSATION FOR CERTAIN LOSSES FOR TED SIMONSON AND 
              REOFORCE INC.

    (a) Payment.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any 
money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Ted Simonson and 
Reoforce, Inc. a sum of money that shall be in full satisfaction of all 
claims Ted Simonson and Reoforce Inc. have against the United States.
    (b) Basis.--The payment required by subsection (a) shall be to 
compensate Ted Simonson and Reoforce Inc. for the injuries sustained by 
Ted Simonson and Reoforce, Inc. as a result of the taking of mining 
claims.

SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.

    The payment made pursuant to section 1 shall be in full 
satisfaction of all claims Ted Simonson and Reoforce Inc. may have 
against the United States for any injury described in such section.

SEC. 3. INELIGIBILITY FOR ADDITIONAL BENEFITS.

    Upon payment of the sum referred to in section 1, Ted Simonson and 
Reoforce, Inc. shall not be eligible for any compensation or benefits 
from the Bureau of Land Management for any injury described in such 
section.

SEC. 4. LIMITATION OF AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES.

    Any contract to the contrary notwithstanding, it shall be unlawful 
for the amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be paid to or received by 
any agent or attorney for any service rendered to Ted Simonson and 
Reoforce, Inc. in connection with the benefits provided by this Act in 
an amount greater than--
            (1) 20 percent of such amount if this relief bill is not 
        referred to the Chief Judge of the United States Court of 
        Federal Claims; or
            (2) 33 percent of such amount if this relief bill is 
        referred to the Chief Judge of the United States Court of 
        Federal Claims.
                                 <all>
```
### §904. Duration of protection

(a) The protection provided for a mask work under this chapter shall commence on the date on which the mask work is registered under section 908, or the date on which the mask work is first commercially exploited anywhere in the world, whichever occurs first.

(b) Subject to subsection (c) and the provisions of this chapter, the protection provided under this chapter to a mask work shall end ten years after the date on which such protection commences under subsection (a).

(c) All terms of protection provided in this section shall run to the end of the calendar year in which they would otherwise expire.

(Added Pub. L. 98–620, title III, §302, Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3349.)
### §244. Discrimination against person wearing uniform of armed forces

Whoever, being a proprietor, manager, or employee of a theater or other public place of entertainment or amusement in the District of Columbia, or in any Territory, or Possession of the United States, causes any person wearing the uniform of any of the armed forces of the United States to be discriminated against because of that uniform, shall be fined under this title.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 697; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §5, 63 Stat. 90; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(G), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### 1948 Act

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §523 (Mar. 1, 1911, ch. 187, 36 Stat. 963; Aug. 24, 1912, ch. 387, §1, 37 Stat. 512; Jan. 28, 1915, ch. 20, §1, 38 Stat. 800).

Words "guilty of a misdemeanor", following "shall be", were omitted as unnecessary in view of definition of "misdemeanor" in section 1 of this title. (See reviser's note under section 212 of this title.)

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### 1949 Act

This section [section 5] substitutes, in section 244 of title 18, U.S.C., "any of the armed forces of the United States" for the enumeration of specific branches and thereby includes the Air Force, formerly part of the Army. This clarification is necessary because of the establishment of the Air Force as a separate branch of the Armed Forces by the act of July 26, 1947.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $500".

1949—Act May 24, 1949, substituted "any of the armed forces of the United States" for enumeration of the specific branches.
Exhibit
      32 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 **(18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**
 
 
 In
        connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Hiko Bell Mining & Oil
        Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the quarter ended December 31,
        2006
        (the "Report"), I, Craig Caldwell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
        hereby certify that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
 (2) The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/
                  Craig CaldwellDated:
                  April 14, 2007Craig
                  CaldwellPresident
                  and
                  Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 The
        above
        certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K
        or
        as a separate disclosure document.
#### Jarvis N. Burr v. Harriet M. Henry.

Filed November 23, 1899.

No. 9,041.

Transcript for Review: Authentication: Dismissal. A proceeding in error will be dismissed where a copy of the final judgment included in the transcript is not authenticated by the certificate of the clerk of the trial court.

*302Error from the district court of Webster county. Tried below before Beall, J.

*Proceeding in error dismissed.*

*James McNeny, J. 8. Gilliam*and *B. McNitt,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. M. Chaffin*and *George B. Ohaney, contra.*

Norval, J.

.This cause originated before a justice of the peace of Webster county, where the plaintiff obtained judgment. The defendant appealed to the district court, and from the briefs we learn that he was again unsuccessful. He has come to this court for redress.

The petition in error must be dismissed, for the reason that copies of the pleadings and final judgment are in no manner authenticated by the certificate of the clerk of the trial court. Appended to the record lodged in this court is the certificate of the clerk of the district court stating “the foregoing to be a true, correct and perfect copy of the transcript in the case of Harriet M. Henry v. Jarvis N. Burr, as appears from the files and record of my office.” This is merely an authentication of the copy of the transcript of the justice of the peace, made for the purpose of appealing to the district court, and such certificate does not include either the pleadings filed in the district ■ court or the final judgment therein rendered. For the omission of a proper certificate we have not acquired jurisdiction of the cause. See *McDonald v. Grabow,*46 Nebr., 406; *Union P. R. Co. v. Kinney,*47 Nebr., 393. The petition in error is, therefore,

Dismissed.