alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 450.332 Project selection from the TIP. ( a ) Once a TIP that meets the requirements of 23 U.S.C. 134(j), 49 U.S.C. 5303(j), and § 450.326 has been developed and approved, the first year of the TIP will constitute an “agreed to” list of projects for project selection purposes and no further project selection action is required for the implementing agency to proceed with projects, except where the appropriated Federal funds available to the metropolitan planning area are significantly less than the authorized amounts or where there are significant shifting of projects between years. In this case, the MPO, the State, and the public transportation operator(s) if requested by the MPO, the State, or the public transportation operator(s) shall jointly develop a revised “agreed to” list of projects. If the State or public transportation operator(s) wishes to proceed with a project in the second, third, or fourth year of the TIP, the specific project selection procedures stated in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section must be used unless the MPO, the State, and the public transportation operator(s) jointly develop expedited project selection procedures to provide for the advancement of projects from the second, third, or fourth years of the TIP.
( b ) In metropolitan areas not designated as TMAs, the State and/or the public transportation operator(s), in cooperation with the MPO shall select projects to be implemented using title 23 U.S.C. funds (other than Tribal Transportation Program, Federal Lands Transportation Program, and Federal Lands Access Program projects) or funds under title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53, from the approved metropolitan TIP. Tribal Transportation Program, Federal Lands Transportation Program, and Federal Lands Access Program projects shall be selected in accordance with procedures developed pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 201, 202, 203, and 204.
( c ) In areas designated as TMAs, the MPO shall select all 23 U.S.C. and 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 funded projects (excluding projects on the NHS and Tribal Transportation Program, Federal Lands Transportation Program, and Federal Lands Access Program) in consultation with the State and public transportation operator(s) from the approved TIP and in accordance with the priorities in the approved TIP. The State shall select projects on the NHS in cooperation with the MPO, from the approved TIP. Tribal Transportation Program, Federal Lands Transportation Program, and Federal Lands Access Program projects shall be selected in accordance with procedures developed pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 201, 202, 203, and 204.
( d ) Except as provided in § 450.326(e) and § 450.330(f), projects not included in the federally approved STIP are not eligible for funding with funds under title 23 U.S.C. or 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53.
( e ) In nonattainment and maintenance areas, priority shall be given to the timely implementation of TCMs contained in the applicable SIP in accordance with the EPA transportation conformity regulations (40 CFR part 93, subpart A).
[81 FR 34135, May 27, 2016, as amended at 81 FR 93473, Dec. 20, 2016; 82 FR 56545, Nov. 29, 2017]
### §577c. Acquisition of additional lands in northern Minnesota

To protect and administer more effectively the publicly owned lands within certain parts of the area described in section 577 of this title, and to accomplish certain public purposes explicit and implicit in sections 577a and 577b of this title, the Secretary of Agriculture is authorized and directed to acquire any lands or interest in lands, and appurtenances thereto, situated within the area described in section 577d of this title, where in his opinion development or exploitation, or the potentialities for development or exploitation, impair or threaten to impair the unique qualities and natural features of the remaining wilderness canoe country.

(June 22, 1948, ch. 593, §1, 62 Stat. 568; Pub. L. 87–351, Oct. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 772.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1961—Pub. L. 87–351 removed the restriction on condemnation of contiguous tracts of land in one ownership, not exceeding five hundred acres in the aggregate, if the lands were encumbered with structures of a permanent type suitable for human occupancy and if the owners thereof filed written objections before expiration of the time for answering the petition in the proceedings.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

The act of June 22, 1948, ch. 593, 62 Stat. 568, as amended, which is classified to sections 577c, 577d, and 577e to 577h of this title, is popularly known as the "Thye-Blatnik Act".
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF SUNGARD DATA SYSTEMS INC. AS OF MARCH
31, 1996 AND THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1996, INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10-Q OF SUNGARD DATA SYSTEMS INC. FOR
THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                         103,201
<SECURITIES>                                    33,038
<RECEIVABLES>                                  139,701
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,866
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               294,803
<PP&E>                                         228,974
<DEPRECIATION>                                 134,282
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 589,609
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          144,490
<BONDS>                                          3,349
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           421
<OTHER-SE>                                     435,778
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   589,609
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               149,798
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,822<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,592
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,960
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,632
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,632
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17<F2>
<FN>
<F1>EXCLUDES SELLING, MARKETING AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS.
<F2>REFLECTS SEPTEMBER 1997 TWO-FOR-ONE STOCK SPLIT.
</FN>





</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN, INC



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of California Pizza
Kitchen, Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 29,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Gregory S. Levin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

| | By:                                                                                   | /s/ GREGORY S. LEVIN
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------
| | Gregory S. Levin                                                                     
| | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Also signing as Chief Accounting Officer)

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 20, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-11076 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DAGOBERTO RODRIGUEZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-108-ALL-P

-------------------- Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Dagoberto Rodriguez-Garcia raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THESE SCHEDULES HAVE BEEN RESTATED TO CONFORM WITH EITF 97-2, AS SUCH, REVENUES
AND EXPENSES OF NON-OWNED MANAGED HOTELS ARE NO LONGER INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
EPS HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 128, AND BASIC AND DILUTED EPS
HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN THE PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED LINE ITEMS, RESPECTIVELY.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000048595
<NAME> STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             423
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      473
<ALLOWANCES>                                        89
<INVENTORY>                                         56
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,001
<PP&E>                                           5,342
<DEPRECIATION>                                     719
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,213
<BONDS>                                          1,575
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,352
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,520
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,175
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,903
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (368)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    28
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  70
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    570
<INCOME-TAX>                                       246
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                321
<DISCONTINUED>                                      14
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                         (11)
<NET-INCOME>                                       324
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.53
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


           In  connection  with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Altrimega   Health
Corporation  (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

           1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           2. The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date:   August 6, 2004                             By: /s/ John W. Gandy
                                                      --------------------------
                                                  Name:  John W. Gandy
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer


Date:   August 6, 2004                             By: /s/ Ron Hendrix
                                                      --------------------------
                                                  Name:  Ron Hendrix
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required  by Section  906,  has been  provided  to  Altrimega  Health
Corporation and will be retained by Altrimega  Health  Corporation and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §2196. Drunkenness or neglect of duty by seamen

Whoever, being a master, officer, radio operator, seaman, apprentice or other person employed on any merchant vessel, by willful breach of duty, or by reason of drunkenness, does any act tending to the immediate loss or destruction of, or serious damage to, such vessel, or tending immediately to endanger the life or limb of any person belonging to or on board of such vessel; or, by willful breach of duty or by neglect of duty or by reason of drunkenness, refuses or omits to do any lawful act proper and requisite to be done by him for preserving such vessel from immediate loss, destruction, or serious damage, or for preserving any person belonging to or on board of such ship from immediate danger to life or limb, shall be imprisoned not more than one year.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 801.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on section 704 of title 46, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Shipping (R.S. §4602).

Words "officer, radio operator," and "or other person employed on" were inserted at beginning of section to insure clarity and scope of section. Section 701 of title 46, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Shipping, is very similar to this section as revised, and has been applied to mates [Morris v. Cornell, D.C. Mass. 1843, Fed. Cas. No. 9,829; Gladding v. Constant, D.C. Mass. 1844, Fed. Cas. No. 5,468; Foye v. Dabney, D.C. Mass. 1853, Fed. Cas. No. 5,022; Foye v. Lickie, D.C. Mass. 1853, Fed. Cas. No. 5,023; The Sylvia De Grasse, D.C.N.Y. 1843, Fed. Cas. No. 12,676; The Sadie C. Sumner, D.C. Mass. 1905, 142 F. 611], as well as engineers, assistant engineers and cooks. (See notes of decisions under section 701, of title 46, U.S.C., Shipping.)

Words "be guilty of a misdemeanor" were omitted as unnecessary in view of general definition of "misdemeanor" in section 1 of this title.

Minor changes were made in phraseology including substitution of "one year" for "twelve months" at end of section.
### §565b. Transfer of fire lookout towers and other improvements for fire control to States, political subdivisions or agencies; reversion

The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized, subject to such conditions as he may prescribe, to transfer, without reimbursement or at such prices and upon such terms as he may impose, to States and political subdivisions or agencies thereof fire lookout towers and other structures or improvements used by the Forest Service for fire prevention or suppression purposes, and the land used in connection therewith if such land is outside national forest boundaries, when they are no longer needed by the Forest Service for such purposes but are of value to the State or political subdivision or agency thereof in its fire protection system: Provided, That if any property so transferred is not put to use for the purpose for which it was transferred within two years from the date of transfer, or if, within fifteen years from the date of transfer, any such property should cease to be used for the purpose for which it was transferred for a period of two years, title thereto shall revert to and immediately revest in the United States.

(Pub. L. 85–464, §5, June 20, 1958, 72 Stat. 217.)
- Newsroom        - Press Releases
      - Public Statements
      - Speeches
      - Testimony
      - Spotlight Topics
      - Media Gallery
      - Upcoming Events
      - Webcasts
      - What's New
      - SEC Videos
      - Reports and Publications
      - RSS Feeds
      - Social Media 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

**TIME AND DATE:** Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Monday, November 2, 2020, at 10:00 a.m.

**PLACE:** The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549.

**STATUS:** This meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public via audio webcast only on the Commission's website at http://www.sec.gov.

**MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:**  The Commission will consider whether to adopt rule amendments to facilitate capital formation and increase opportunities for investors by expanding access to capital for small and medium-sized businesses and entrepreneurs across the United States.  Specifically, the Commission will consider whether to adopt rule amendments to simplify, harmonize, and improve certain aspects of the framework for exemptions from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 to promote capital formation while preserving or enhancing important investor protections and reducing complexities in the exempt offering framework that may impede access to investment opportunities for investors and access to capital for businesses and entrepreneurs.

Dated: October 26, 2020

J. Matthew DeLesDernierAssistant Secretary
Exhibit 23.1


       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 2-78323, 33-9082, 33-
26468, 33-33701 and 333-19007) and Form S-3 (Nos. 333-15675 and
333-21953) of Hughes Supply, Inc. of our report dated March 21,
1997, appearing on page 27 of the Annual Report to Shareholders
which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP

Price Waterhouse LLP
April 25, 1997
#### John F. Hemenway, Administrator, etc., of Josephine Hemenway, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*Ann Fitzgerald, Appellant.

First Department,

December 31, 1913.

Practice — change of venue — convenience of witnesses.

A motion by a defendant to change the place of trial for the convenience of witnesses should be granted where it appears that she has five witnesses beside herself residing in the county to which the Venue is sought to be changed whose testimony will be necessary and material, and that the plaintiff has a single witness residing in the county where the venue is now laid.

Appeal by the defendant, Ann Fitzgerald, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 4th day of October, 1913, denying defendant’s motion for a change of venue.

*Abel Merchant, Jr.,*for the appellant.

*Mervyn Mackenzie,*for the respondent.

McLaughlin, J.:

Appeal from an order denying a motion to change the place of trial, for the convenience of witnesses, from New York to Eensselaer county. Action is upon a promissory note alleged to have been made by one Eowan, payable to the order of the Sunset Silver Lead and Zinc Mines Company, indorsed by defendant before delivery to the'payee and subsequently, before maturity, transferred to plaintiff’s intestate. It was dated at Albany, N. Y., and there presented for payment, which was refused, and protest alleged to have been duly served. The answer is a general denial and affirmative defenses of payment, that the note was procured by fraud, and want of consideration.

The defendant is a resident of Rensselaer county, N. Y., and plaintiff’s intestate died a resident of Onondaga county, N. Y., and letters of administration of her estate were there issued to the plaintiff. It appears from the moving affidavits that defendant has five witnesses, besides herself, residing in Bensselaer county, whose testimony will be necessary and material upon at least one or'the other of the issues in the action; that *749defendant is over seventy years of age, infirm and unable to travel. It does not appear that the plaintiff has a single witness residing in the city of New York.

Upon these facts I am of the opinion that the motion to change the place of trial should have been granted. The fact that the only necessary and material witnesses, so far as appears, reside in Rensselaer county, is sufficient of itself to justify the changing of the place of trial from such county to the county where the defendant resides.

The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
§ 811.3 Notice of obligation to register. ( a ) Sex offenders may be notified of their obligation to register under various provisions of law. See sections 4, 6 and 8 of the Sex Offender Registration Act of 1999 (D.C. Official Code sections 22-4003, 4005, 4007) (relating to notice by the District of Columbia Superior Court, Department of Corrections, or CSOSA); 18 U.S.C. 4042(c) (relating to notice by Federal Bureau of Prisons and probation offices); 18 U.S.C. 3563(a)(8), 3583(d), 4209(a) (inclusion of registration requirements as conditions of release under federal law); 42 U.S.C. 14071(b)(1) (notice under federal law standards for state sex offender registration programs).
( b ) In some cases, sex offenders may not be notified of their obligation to register. Lack of notice does not excuse a failure to register because sex offenders have an independent obligation to register. Persons who have been convicted or found not guilty by reason of insanity of a sex offense or who have been determined to be a sexual psychopath should report to CSOSA in order to ascertain whether they are required to register.