alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET OF HUGHES  SUPPLY,  INC. AS OF JANUARY 28, 2000, AND
THE RELATED  STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000049029
<NAME> HUGHES SUPPLY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-28-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-28-2000
<CASH>                                          10,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  401,021
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,777
<INVENTORY>                                    495,491
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               957,778
<PP&E>                                         236,897
<DEPRECIATION>                                  91,952
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,369,014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          300,278
<BONDS>                                        535,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,249
<OTHER-SE>                                     498,195
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,369,014
<SALES>                                      2,994,877
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,994,877
<CGS>                                        2,320,604
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,320,604
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               538,273
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,608
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,805
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                109,602
<INCOME-TAX>                                    43,731
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             65,871
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    65,871
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.80



</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 772

 769

 772

 770

 763

 692

 634

 683

 723

 734

 733

 724

 697

 769

 799

 789

 761

 759

 735

 717

 734

 736

 725

 703

 670

 664

 653

 634

 633

 635

 644

 675

 754

 748

 750

 697

 628

 623

 635

 650

 673

 696

 702

 651

 692

 753

 759

 748

 731

 104

 644

 708

 724

 533

 672

 596

 592

 530

 581

 624

 623

 633

 737

 760

 761

 760

 731

 659

 627

 658

 700

 720

 721

 715

 671

 741

 780

 769

 754

 749

 482

 702

 723

 731

 656

 686

 643

 646

 624

 618

 628

 629

 638

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 471

 486

 486

 486

 468

 423

 403

 423

 449

 461

 462

 458

 431

 474

 498

 491

 482

 479

 314

 450

 463

 468

 421

 440

 413

 415

 402

 398

 404

 405

 410

TOTAL 21,419

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Racing Capital, Inc. (the
      “ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:May
                ___, 2007
            By:*/s/
                A. Robert Koveleski*Name:A.
                Robert KoveleskiTitle:President
                and Chief Executive Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to American Racing Capital, Inc. and will
      be
      retained by American Racing Capital, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 1350 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Lotus Pacific, Inc (“Company”)on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Vincent Y.Yan, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)          the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange act of1934; and

(2)          the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: April 15, 2004 |                                                   |
|---------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |                                                   |
|                      | */s/**DAVIS,  Steve*                                   |   |
|                      | DAVIS, Steve                                           |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Lotus Pacific, Inc. and will be retained by Lotus Pacific,Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, D. Elroy Fimrite, President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of SNRG CORPORATION (Formerly Texen Oil & Gas, Inc.) hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SNRG CORPORATION (Formerly Texen Oil & Gas, Inc.) for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SNRG CORPORATION (Formerly Texen Oil & Gas, Inc.) |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dated: Sep19, 2006

/s/ D. Elroy Fimrite

D. Elroy Fimrite, President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to SNRG CORPORATION (Formerly Texen Oil & Gas, Inc.) and will be retained by SNRG CORPORATION (Formerly Texen Oil & Gas, Inc.) and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Bernice E. Meehan, Respondent, v. James McCloy et al., Appellants.

*707All concur.
§ 361.740 What funds are used to pay for infrastructure costs in the State one-stop infrastructure funding mechanism? ( a ) In the State funding mechanism, infrastructure costs for WIOA title I programs, including Native American Programs described in 20 CFR part 684, may be paid using program funds, administrative funds, or both. Infrastructure costs for the Senior Community Service Employment Program under title V of the Older Americans Act (42 U.S.C. 3056 *et seq.*) may also be paid using program funds, administrative funds, or both.
( b ) In the State funding mechanism, infrastructure costs for other required one-stop partner programs (listed in §§ 361.400 through 361.410) are limited to the program's administrative funds, as appropriate.
( c ) In the State funding mechanism, infrastructure costs for the adult education program authorized by title II of WIOA must be paid from the funds that are available for local administration and may be paid from funds made available by the State or non-Federal resources that are cash, in-kind, or third-party contributions.
( d ) In the State funding mechanism, infrastructure costs for the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 must be paid from funds available for local administration of postsecondary level programs and activities to eligible recipients or consortia of eligible recipients and may be paid from funds made available by the State or non-Federal resources that are cash, in-kind, or third-party contributions.
# Official Journal L 134/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.134.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 134 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5229 May 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.134.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 134

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5229 May 2009

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 of 5 May 2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 of 5 May 2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual-use items

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 1 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 2 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 3 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 4 not include the filing date. 5 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 6 CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC, 7 Plaintiff-Appellee, 8

v. NO. 29,194 9 RICO S. GIRON, aka RICARDO 10 S. GIRON 11 Defendant-Appellant, 12 and 13 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 14 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, 15 TAXATION AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT 16 OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, and 17 RW VENTURES, INC., 18 Defendants. 19 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN MIGUEL COUNTY 20 Donald C. Schutte, District Judge 21 SHEEHAN, SHEEHAN & STELZNER, P.A. 22 Juan L. Flores 23 Albuquerque, NM 24 for Appellee 252 Ricardo S. Giron 1 Las Vegas, NM 2 Pro Se Appellant 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION 4 KENNEDY, Judge. 5 Defendant appeals from anorder striking his jury demand. [RP 213, 253] 6 Defendant raises several claims of error re lating to the proceedings that have occurred 7 thus far in the case. However, becausewe are without jurisdiction to address 8 Defendant’s claims of error at this point in the litigation, we dismiss Defendant’s 9 appeal. 10 This Court’s jurisdiction is limite d to appeals from final judgments, 11 interlocutory orders which practically dispos e of the merits of an action, and final 12 orders after entry of judgment which affect substantial rights. NMSA 1978, § 39-3-2 13 (1966). “In general, an order or judgment is not considered final unless all issues of 14 law and fact have been determined and the case disposed of by the [district] court to 15 the fullest extent possible.” Khalsa v. Levinson , 1998-NMCA-110, ¶ 17, 125 N.M. 16 680, 964 P.2d 844 (internal quotati on marks and citation omitted). 17 This case is a suit for foreclosure. [R P 1] Because the district court’s order 18 striking Defendant’s jury demand did not determine all issues of law and fact raised by 19 the foreclosure action and did not dispose of the case to the fullest extent possible, that 203 order was not a final order for purposes of appeal. Furthermore, there has been no 1 other order entered in the case disposing of the foreclosure action. We therefore 2 dismiss the appeal. See Mimbres Valley Irrigation Co. v. Salopek , 2006-NMCA-093, 3 ¶ 23, 140 N.M. 168, 140 P.3d 1117 (dismissing an appeal for lack of a final order). We 4 note, however, that once the district court ente rs a final order in the case, any aggrieved 5 party will be free to appeal at that time in accordance with case law and the New 6 Mexico Rules of Appellate Procedure. 7 Therefore, for the reasons stated in this opinion and in our notice of proposed 8 summary disposition, we dismiss Defendant’s appeal. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10

___________________________________ 11 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 12 WE CONCUR : 13

___________________________ 14 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 15

___________________________ 16 ROBERT E. ROBLES, Judge 17
### §956. Inspection of returns, records, or other reports

Any person authorized to carry out enforcement activities under this chapter and any person authorized by the commissions shall have power without warrant or other process, to inspect, at any reasonable time, catch returns, statistical records, or other reports as are required by regulations adopted pursuant to this chapter to be made, kept, or furnished.

(Sept. 7, 1950, ch. 907, §7, 64 Stat. 778; Pub. L. 87–814, §3, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 924.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1962—Pub. L. 87–814 substituted provisions respecting inspection of returns, records, or other reports for provisions authorizing a fine not exceeding $1,000 and proceedings for injunction against fishing for or possessing the kind of fish covered by the convention for failure to make, keep, furnish, or refusal to permit inspection of returns, records, or reports or for furnishing a false return, record, or report.
#### Jara C. UZENDA, a/k/a Jara Uzenda Gobbi, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ralph STROMAN; Bank of New York; Peter D. Korn; Suntrust Mortgage Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-2326.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 18, 2002.

Decided May 10, 2002.

Jara C. Uzenda, Appellant Pro Se. Arrigo Paul Carotti, McCutcheon, McCutcheon & Baxter, P.A., Conway, South Carolina; John Sanford Kay, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Jara C. Uzenda seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Uzenda’s motion for leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See Uzenda v. Stroman,*No. CA-01-2212-4-22 (D.S.C. June 25, 2001; Oct. 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
!	

"
#


 
$
	# 
		 


!


"#"

$	


	



%&'("
"
)$"(#*	





%&
)#
##
"
"
"
+
"
#



,"-((
.

$$#/"
0#$
12


0-
1

%&'("
"
3"
#)4#	
0+"-

"##-01#+"#


#"-
'("
"
(#

1%&5"-)4#

	
0$"#"--

##0$$"
"
0/"
-("$
0-"'("
"
4

#	
0$"#"-((#0#
"

$'("
"
-"+#

$0"

$'("
"
"60"#4#	
0+"-
+0(#*
7
"



'("
"
4""*

28989'("
"
"'3382:9$
"4#""$0

28989"$
#;*(
<3
==3>%&;3)60$
$"

1
0
$?"
+##((
.#
$"("4#""$0

 

5;928;'@=28<389A;2==3

	"
'B
:ACDED

+"#F$$*:AC

B"$90,:ACD

G"+".3,"+A0"

((	0
:"-""D

;(%HGGGHD






Case 18-12095-BFK Doc 178 Filed 12/21/18 Entered 12/21/18 12:28:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
28989;3>60$
"101
$
0
$

,/"

1
0
$?DDH"
+##((
.#
$"("4#""$0

28989
"0
"I###"
#
*
;301
$

$
-
"-1
0%&'
+#'1
0)$
((
.

 ;
((*
;3$"$*
%J
$'
+#'1
0

0
*
$"2#

 ;
((*
;31""-$"$*
%J
$

'
+#'1
0"$
060(1
(*"((1
"#"-"

B0*."
"((1(("#

$
(#*
$


1
"."
*1"#04#""$0

28989$#/"
0#*;3$'("
"
3"
#1*

"#"


#
."1
$--1.
#;3

9#      

!"#A,0
*	
0$


9""

$:"-""

"
	
	%

  KK  	!   

5;928;'@=28<389A;2==3

	"
'B
:ACDED

+"#F$$*:AC

B"$90,:ACD

G"+".3,"+A0"

((	0
:"-""D

;(
%HGGGHD

91"( #-$$*L.(.

1








Dec 21 2018

December 21, 2018 /s/ Brian F. Kenney

Case 18-12095-BFK Doc 178 Filed 12/21/18 Entered 12/21/18 12:28:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
	


%

  "" 	#    

8"
#'0
96%:ACH

+"#:
96%#1"#

+"


F#<A1"==3

2A
0AA0"

("1
M*(#

%DGG

$
%&
 

 
 
 &'(()*+,+*,



*
"$*$
-
"-
##
#*((
*"

  KK   	! 




G

Case 18-12095-BFK Doc 178 Filed 12/21/18 Entered 12/21/18 12:28:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Dan Moses, Chief Financial Officer of SimpleTech, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ DAN MOSES          
|Dan Moses              
|Chief Financial Officer



November 1, 2004
#### Aurelia M. Burnstine, Respondent, *v.*Nathan Burnstine, Appellant.

Appeal from order denying motion for resettlement of findings and judgment, and from order denying motion for reargument.

Per Curiam:

The order denying motion for reargument is affirmed. The order denying motion for resettlement is modified by striking out the provision of the judgment that it was entered on motion of the defendant’s attorney, and as so modified affirmed, without costs, on the ground that the judgment can be corrected on appeal from the judgment, and not an appeal from an order denying a motion to resettle it. Present— Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order denying motion for reargument affirmed. Order denying motion for resettlement modified as provided in opinion, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice,
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5093 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5093

 To amend the West Los Angeles Leasing Act of 2016 to provide for the 
  treatment of proceeds from seized or forfeited assets in connection 
       with certain third-party land use, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 14, 2019

  Mr. Ted Lieu of California introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the West Los Angeles Leasing Act of 2016 to provide for the 
  treatment of proceeds from seized or forfeited assets in connection 
       with certain third-party land use, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``West Los Angeles VA Campus 
Improvement Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF PROCEEDS FROM SEIZED OR FORFEITED ASSETS UNDER 
              WEST LOS ANGELES LEASING ACT OF 2016.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (d) of section 2 of the West Los 
Angeles Leasing Act of 2016 (Public Law 114-226; 38 U.S.C. 101 note), 
is amended to read as follows:
    ``(d) Revenues From Leases at the Campus.--
            ``(1) In general.--Any funds received by the Secretary 
        under a lease described in subsection (b) shall be credited to 
        the applicable Department medical facilities account and shall 
        be available, without fiscal year limitation and without 
        further appropriation, exclusively for the renovation and 
        maintenance of the land and facilities at the Campus.
            ``(2) Treatment of proceeds from seized or forfeited 
        assets.--Proceeds from any seized or forfeited assets, and any 
        restitution paid, in connection with any third-party land use 
        at the Department of Veterans Affairs West Los Angeles Campus 
        in Los Angeles, California, shall be considered funds received 
        under paragraph (1).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to funds received by the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs after the date of the enactment of the West Los Angeles Leasing 
Act of 2016 (Public Law 114-226; 38 U.S.C. 101 note).
                                 <all>
```