alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Alexandria Division 

In the Matter of: 

 Chapter 13

BEN POURBABAI 18-13560-BFK

 

 Debtor

TRUSTEE’S RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE 

AUTOMATIC STAY 

Thomas P. Gorman, Trustee, responds to Motion for Relief from the Automatic 

Stay by stating he has no opposition to relief from stay being lifted for the limited 

purpose of Debtor pursuing his appeal rights. 

_November 2, 2018________ _/s/ Thomas P. Gorman ________ 

Dated Thomas P. Gorman 

Chapter 13 Trustee 

300 N. Washington Street, #400 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

(703) 836-2226 

VSB #26421 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this 2nd day of November, 2018 mailed a true copy of the 

foregoing Response to the following parties. 

Ben Pourbabai 

Chapter 13 Debtor 

9896 Sunnybrook Dr. 

Great Falls, VA 22066 

Fenlene H. Edrington, Esq. 

Counsel for Debtor 

Moreton and Edrington, PLC 

297 Herndon Parkway, Suite 302 

Herndon, VA 20170

 ___/s/ Thomas P. Gorman ______ 

 Thomas P. Gorman 

Case 18-13560-BFK Doc 16 Filed 11/02/18 Entered 11/02/18 14:08:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
#### Hannah Goggin Blice, Appellant, v. John B. Goggin and Others, Respondents.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, *First.*That the determination of the Special Term that plaintiff did not purchase the mortgage but paid the same to discharge her debt to defendant, John B. Goggin, is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. *Second.*That entry of judgment upon the memorandum or opinion of the justice presiding at the trial without formal findings was irregular and unauthorized. All concurred.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 8,930

 8,662

 8,205

 7,590

 6,496

 5,854

 4,975

 5,411

 6,578

 8,432

 8,392

 7,985

 7,741

 8,399

 9,038

 8,538

 8,345

 8,561

 8,538

 8,312

 7,456

 7,149

 7,700

 7,971

 9,150

 9,407

 10,087

 10,018

 10,129

 9,211

 9,408

 1,200

 1,198

 1,131

 1,502

 1,433

 1,284

 1,157

 1,009

 983

 1,551

 1,279

 778

 617

 747

 1,017

 1,018

 1,199

 1,387

 1,936

 2,206

 2,294

 2,299

 2,418

 2,519

 2,328

 2,564

 2,264

 1,864

 1,833

 1,607

 1,920

 4,658

 4,539

 4,444

 4,288

 4,069

 3,698

 3,246

 3,038

 2,832

 3,694

 3,947

 3,696

 3,694

 4,010

 4,326

 4,333

 4,527

 4,725

 5,098

 5,140

 5,057

 4,772

 4,757

 4,672

 5,068

 5,549

 5,472

 5,243

 5,327

 5,077

 5,230

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 15, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Case 19-32377-KRH Doc 1 Filed 05/03/19 Entered 05/03/19 13:25:10 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 13
Case 19-32377-KRH Doc 1 Filed 05/03/19 Entered 05/03/19 13:25:10 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 13
Case 19-32377-KRH Doc 1 Filed 05/03/19 Entered 05/03/19 13:25:10 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 13
Case 19-32377-KRH Doc 1 Filed 05/03/19 Entered 05/03/19 13:25:10 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 13
Case 19-32377-KRH Doc 1 Filed 05/03/19 Entered 05/03/19 13:25:10 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 13
Case 19-32377-KRH Doc 1 Filed 05/03/19 Entered 05/03/19 13:25:10 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 13
Case 19-32377-KRH Doc 1 Filed 05/03/19 Entered 05/03/19 13:25:10 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 13
Case 19-32377-KRH Doc 1 Filed 05/03/19 Entered 05/03/19 13:25:10 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 13
Case 19-32377-KRH Doc 1 Filed 05/03/19 Entered 05/03/19 13:25:10 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 13
Case 19-32377-KRH Doc 1 Filed 05/03/19 Entered 05/03/19 13:25:10 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 13
Case 19-32377-KRH Doc 1 Filed 05/03/19 Entered 05/03/19 13:25:10 Desc Main

 Document Page 11 of 13
Case 19-32377-KRH Doc 1 Filed 05/03/19 Entered 05/03/19 13:25:10 Desc Main

 Document Page 12 of 13
Case 19-32377-KRH Doc 1 Filed 05/03/19 Entered 05/03/19 13:25:10 Desc Main

 Document Page 13 of 13
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                    1,589
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          1,589
<PP&E>                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            1,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         0
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                 36,180
<OTHER-SE>                              (34,591)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              1,589
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              0
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         17,711
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        (17,711)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               0
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            (17,711)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0


</TABLE>
(No. 74-CC-563

#### Forest Hospital, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 15, 1974.*

Forest Hospital, Claimant, pro se.

*411William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-30971

Summary Calendar

 

HERSCHEL BROWN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CITY OF SHREVEPORT; ROBERT W. WILLIAMS,

Mayor, City of Shreveport; JERALD JONES,

City Attorney for the City of Shreveport;

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JANET RENO,

U.S. Attorney General; MICHAEL D. SKINNER,

U.S. Attorney,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-2343

- - - - - - - - - -

August 31, 1998

Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Herschel Brown appeals the district court’s dismissal of his

Voting Rights Act action. He argues that the district court

erred in dismissing his action against the United States, Janet

Reno, and Michael D. Skinner for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction. The district court for the District of Columbia

has exclusive jurisdiction over actions against federal officers 
No. 97-30971 

-2-

or employees challenging the enforcement of the Voting Rights

Act. 42 U.S.C. § 1973l(b); South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383

U.S. 301, 331 (1966). The district court did not err in

dismissing Brown’s action against the United States, Janet Reno,

and Michael Skinner for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Brown argues that the district court erred in dismissing his

action against the City of Shreveport and the city officials for

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Because Brown failed to

allege sufficient facts to meet the three threshold requirements

to establish a claim under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act,

the district court did not err in dismissing Brown’s Section 2

claim under Rule 12(b)(6). See Thornburg v. Gingles, 478 U.S.

30, 48-51 (1986). Because Brown acknowledges that the City

submitted the redistricting plan to the United States Attorney

General for preclearance and that the Attorney General did not

object to the plan, the district court did not err in dismissing

Brown’s claim under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. See 42

U.S.C. § 1973c. Brown has not alleged sufficient facts to state

a claim under the Fourteenth or Fifteenth Amendments that the

City’s redistricting plan was enacted with the purpose of

intentional discrimination against the black minority registered

voters or that an actual discriminatory effect resulted. See

Davis v. Bandemer, 478 U.S. 109, 127-134 (1986); City of Mobile,

Ala. v. Bolden, 446 U.S. 55, 62 (1980). Further, Brown has

failed to allege sufficient facts to show that the City was

unresponsive to black registered voters. See Lodge v. Buxton,
No. 97-30971 

-3-

639 F.2d 1358, 1375 (5th Cir. Unit B. 1981), aff’d, 458 U.S. 613

(1982). Therefore, the district court did not err in dismissing

Brown’s complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief

may be granted.

AFFIRMED.
#### Clara Lasky et al., Appellants, v. 724 Garden Street Corporation, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 895

 814

 805

 945

 985

 954

 896

 931

 945

 933

 928

 891

 876

 904

 920

 887

 905

 951

 974

 939

 901

 950

 911

 900

 843

 730

 780

 788

 690

 346

 320

 303

 282

 282

 283

 291

 296

 303

 306

 324

 316

 327

 309

 321

 314

 304

 311

 413

 328

 311

 311

 305

 300

 308

 313

 315

 331

 322

 568

 568

 572

 567

 515

 531

 512

 516

 526

 556

 628

 564

 558

 582

 564

 558

 535

 512

 713

 508

 548

 601

 586

 551

 541

 515

 513

 535

 427

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 10, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 367

 367

 369

 366

 334

 344

 332

 335

 341

 360

 404

 365

 361

 376

 365

 361

 347

 332

 457

 330

 355

 387

 378

 357

 350

 334

 333

 347

 280

TOTAL 15,970

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

 Division 

In re Case No. 

Debtor(s) Chapter 

ORDER FOR RETURN OF UNCLAIMED 

FUNDS 

An Application for Payment of Unclaimed Funds having been filed pursuant to Local 

Bankruptcy Rule 3011-1, said application having been served on the United States Trustee and 

the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia and there being no objections 

filed; it is 

ORDERED that the unclaimed funds in the amount of $ , 

currently on deposit with the Treasury of the United States, be returned to: 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that such funds shall be disbursed only after 14 days 

has expired from the date of entry of this Order.

Let the Clerk give notice of entry of this order to the debtor(s), attorney for 

debtor(s), movant, attorney for movant, if applicable, trustee and United States Trustee. 

Date: 

United States Bankruptcy Judge 

NOTICE OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER 

ENTERED ON DOCKET: ___________________________ 

 

pc: Financial Administrator 

 [ounclmfd ver. 10/22]

Richmond

Delta Career Education Corporation 18-33822-KLP

7

126,399.42

Dilks & Knopik, LLC as assignee to Troy Business Park Ltd.

35308 SE Center Street

Snoqualmie, WA 98065

Dec 5 2023 /s/ Keith L Phillips

Dec 5 2023

AMENDED

Case 18-33822-KLP Doc 456 Filed 12/05/23 Entered 12/05/23 16:53:33 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
#### Chamberlain Banking House v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company of Hartford.

Filed November 9, 1899.

No. 9,007.

Garnishment: Rights oe Parties: Assignments: Res Judicata.

Error from the district court of Johnson county. Tried below before Letton, J.

*Reversed.*

*M. B. G. True*and *8. P. Davidson,*for plaintiff in error.

*O. G. Flansburg, contra.*

Harrison, C. J.

By stipulation the decision in the case of *Chamberlain Banking House v. Reliance Ins. Co.,*59 Nebr., 195, filed at this time, is to govern the disposition of this one. Following that decision, the judgment herein is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 628

 612

 669

 674

 792

 798

 671

 802

 790

 778

 812

 819

 808

 761

 733

 842

 886

 895

 900

 886

 849

 866

 863

 855

 850

 856

 869

 876

 878

 877

 892

 589

 588

 613

 642

 635

 653

 644

 677

 730

 733

 778

 809

 764

 734

 717

 734

 846

 886

 887

 849

 843

 846

 851

 850

 841

 843

 855

 866

 875

 871

 876

 606

 596

 643

 664

 691

 735

 652

 756

 748

 753

 798

 815

 787

 747

 725

 792

 872

 889

 892

 866

 845

 858

 855

 852

 845

 848

 863

 872

 876

 875

 882

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 6, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 391

 384

 413

 426

 443

 470

 419

 483

 478

 481

 509

 520

 502

 478

 464

 505

 555

 565

 567

 551

 538

 546

 544

 543

 538

 540

 549

 555

 557

 557

 561

TOTAL 24,498

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of LegalPlay Entertainment Inc. on form
10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Page, Director of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



August 29, 2005                                  /s/ John Page
-----------------------                          ---------------------------
(Date)                                           John Page
                                                 Director / Treasurer
### §§921 to 923. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 921, acts Aug. 8, 1946, ch. 879, §1, 60 Stat. 930; Aug. 18, 1949, ch. 478, §3, 63 Stat. 616; July 30, 1951, ch. 256, 65 Stat. 131; July 1, 1952, ch. 537, 66 Stat. 314, directed the Director of the Fish and Wildlife Service to investigate the abundance and distribution of sea lampreys, required a report to the Congress not later than Dec. 31, 1950, and authorized appropriations through the fiscal year ending June 30, 1953.

Sections 922, 923, act Aug. 8, 1946, ch. 879, §§2, 3, 60 Stat. 930, 931, which related to cooperation between Federal, State, and local agencies and the annual cost of the program, were omitted by act Aug. 18, 1949, ch. 478, §3, 63 Stat. 616, which amended act Aug. 8, 1946.
### §1003. Obligation to make royalty payments

(a) Prohibition on Importation and Manufacture.—No person shall import into and distribute, or manufacture and distribute, any digital audio recording device or digital audio recording medium unless such person records the notice specified by this section and subsequently deposits the statements of account and applicable royalty payments for such device or medium specified in section 1004.

(b) Filing of Notice.—The importer or manufacturer of any digital audio recording device or digital audio recording medium, within a product category or utilizing a technology with respect to which such manufacturer or importer has not previously filed a notice under this subsection, shall file with the Register of Copyrights a notice with respect to such device or medium, in such form and content as the Register shall prescribe by regulation.

(c) Filing of Quarterly and Annual Statements of Account.—

(1) Generally.—Any importer or manufacturer that distributes any digital audio recording device or digital audio recording medium that it manufactured or imported shall file with the Register of Copyrights, in such form and content as the Register shall prescribe by regulation, such quarterly and annual statements of account with respect to such distribution as the Register shall prescribe by regulation.

(2) Certification, verification, and confidentiality.—Each such statement shall be certified as accurate by an authorized officer or principal of the importer or manufacturer. The Register shall issue regulations to provide for the verification and audit of such statements and to protect the confidentiality of the information contained in such statements. Such regulations shall provide for the disclosure, in confidence, of such statements to interested copyright parties.

(3) Royalty payments.—Each such statement shall be accompanied by the royalty payments specified in section 1004.

(Added Pub. L. 102–563, §2, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4240.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 519

 534

 489

 523

 512

 523

 514

 529

 509

 520

 524

 547

 549

 578

 594

 641

 667

 640

 636

 628

 632

 639

 637

 636

 614

 618

 613

 611

 638

 621

 407

 431

 439

 439

 457

 452

 457

 463

 439

 440

 456

 457

 479

 476

 486

 510

 560

 563

 557

 568

 571

 559

 522

 515

 512

 518

 529

 516

 525

 561

 466

 470

 464

 479

 491

 498

 488

 491

 481

 491

 497

 494

 522

 541

 557

 573

 596

 602

 606

 607

 612

 617

 594

 582

 581

 583

 583

 578

 583

 596

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 304

 306

 303

 312

 319

 324

 318

 319

 313

 319

 323

 321

 339

 350

 360

 370

 384

 388

 391

 391

 394

 397

 383

 376

 375

 376

 376

 373

 376

 384

TOTAL 16,323

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

October 5, 2009

DAILY CVP WATER SUPPLY REPORT

SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 RUN DATE:

RESERVOIR RELEASES IN CUBIC FEET/SECOND

TRINITY

SACRAMENTO

FEATHER

AMERICAN

STANISLAUS

SAN JOAQUIN

LEWISTON

KESWICK

OROVILLE (SWP)

NIMBUS

GOODWIN

FRIANT

RESERVOIR MEDIAN 2008 2009 15

 468

 6,514

 1,900

 995

 204

 185

 448

 5,921

 2,000

 1,749

 704

 164

RESERVOIR CAPACITY YR AVG

TRINITY

SHASTA

OROVILLE (SWP)

FOLSOM

NEW MELONES

FED. SAN LUIS

2008 2009

 1,137

 1,384

 1,097

 270

 1,099

 37

 919

 1,774

 1,337

 412

 1,108

 198

 15

STORAGE IN MAJOR RESERVOIRS IN THOUSANDS OF ACRE-FEET

MILLERTON 

TOT. N. CVP 

 199 350

 3,927 4,411

2,448

4,552

3,538

977

2,420

966

520

11,360

% OF 15YR AVG 

RESERVOIR CURRENT

YR AVG

TRINITY

SHASTA

FOLSOM

NEW MELONES

1983

 2,888

 10,794

 6,541

 2,747

 799

 4,535

 1,963

 868

 15

MILLERTON 1,429 4,705

DRIEST % OF

ACCUMULATED INFLOW FOR WATER YEAR TO DATE IN THOUSANDS OF ACRE-FEET

WY WY 

WETTEST

WY 

YR

AVG

 15

2009 1977

DAM YR

RESERVOIR

CURRENT

TRINITY AT

FISH HATCHERY

SACRAMENTO AT 

SHASTA DAM 

AMERICAN AT 

BLUE CANYON

STANISLAUS AT

NEW MELONES

1983

 58.58

 116.63

 105.60

 46.79

 0.00

 0.00

 0.00

 0.01

SAN JOAQUIN AT

HUNTINGTON LK 

 85.00 0.00

DRIEST 

ACCUMULATED PRECIPITATION FOR WATER YEAR TO DATE IN INCHES

WY WY 

WETTEST

WY 

% OF

2009 1977 AVG

AVG

(N YRS)

 225

 2,628

 356

 0

 377

 16.35

 26.44

 18.28

 0.00

 17.60

 24.56

 54.92

 64.86

 27.09

 34.69

 450

 7,035

 2,900

 1,748

 226

 210

 1,634 56

 2,644

 2,106

 537

 1,606

 288

 246

 6,709

 67

 63

 77

 69

 69

 142

 66

 32.80

 1,494

 6,459

 3,022

 1,225

 1,956

 53

 70

 65

 71

 73

 75

 63.28

 65.52

 26.96

 43.71

 87

 99

 100

 79

 47

 52

 34

 31

 34

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

 LAST 

24 HRS

WY WY

WY WY
### rFlLEDlNCOURTOFAPPEALS 12thCcjkL"'•AppealsDistrict

RE: Case No. 15-0180 COA #: 12-14-00238-CV TC#: 20870 STYLE:IN THE INTEREST OF S.R., A CHILD. FILECOPY DATE: 3/9/2015
A petition for review was filed today in the above-styled case. Respondent may file either a. response, or a waiver of response. If you file a 

### waiver, the Court will not grant the petition without first requesting a response. (Tex. R. App. P. 53.3) There is no fee for a response or a waiver. MS. CATHY S. LUSK CLERK, TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS 1517 WEST FRONT, SUITE 354 TYLER, TX 75702
Exhibit 32.02

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FormCap Corp. ( the "Registrant" )
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ( the "Quarterly
Report" ),  I,  Michael Lee,  Chief Accounting Officer of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
    the Registrant.


Dated : October 17, 2008        Signature : /s/ Michael Lee
                                            ---------------------
                                            Michael Lee
                                            Chief Accounting Officer

<PAGE>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

5 

KA 11-01023 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ERIC HINTZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ALAN WILLIAMS OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DAVID A. HERATY OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Penny

M. Wolfgang, J.), rendered March 29, 2011. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the

second degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his

plea of guilty of attempted burglary in the second degree (Penal Law

§§ 110.00, 140.25 [2]), defendant contends that the waiver of the

right to appeal is not valid and challenges the severity of the

sentence. We agree with defendant that the waiver of the right to

appeal is invalid because the brief inquiry made by Supreme Court was

“insufficient to establish that the court ‘engage[d] the defendant in

an adequate colloquy to ensure that the waiver of the right to appeal

was a knowing and voluntary choice’ ” (People v Brown, 296 AD2d 860,

860, lv denied 98 NY2d 767; see People v Hamilton, 49 AD3d 1163,

1164). Nevertheless, we conclude that the sentence is not unduly

harsh or severe. 

Entered: February 8, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court