alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Appendix A

Updates and Errata to the 

Final Environmental 

Impact Statement
Updates and Errata

Table of Contents

Pages xviii and xix

In the List of Tables, the tables for Sections 3.7 and 3.8 are missing the hyphen in the table 

number (for example: Table 3.7 1, rather than Table 3.7-1). These should all have hyphens 

in the table number.

Section 1.0

Page 1-12: The URLs for the following NRC documents are now:

Source and Byproduct Material License

http://adams.nrc.gov/wba/ 

Under Advanced Search, Document Properties, Accession Number ML111940049

Safety Evaluation Report

http://adams.nrc.gov/wba/ 

Under Advanced Search, Document Properties, Accession Number ML112231724

Section 1.4.3: add the following paragraph

Since the publication of the EIS, LCI has indicated an intent to develop the LC East Area. 

Because LCI has not prepared or submitted a proposed plan modification to BLM, there is 

insufficient information to address this expansion in this Final EIS, as the development extent

is speculative at this time. Any development activity in this area would be covered by a 

separate NEPA analysis and decision. Development of the LC East Area was appropriately 

considered in the Cumulative Effects section of this Final EIS.

Section 2.0 

Pages 2-57 through 2-61:

In the header row of Table 2.2-1, the WDEQ-LQD Permit No. should be “788” rather than 

“766.”

Table 2.2-2: 

Add the following row to the table:

Resource Aspect Description of Measures 

Transportation Roads LCI will obtain a Road Use and Maintenance 

Agreement from the BLM for any crossing, 

access to, or use of a BLM-controlled road 

outside the permit boundary.
Section 3.3

Page 3.3-11:

On bottom of the page, part of the sentence is missing. It should read: "a major 

paleochannel. The mineralization occurs as both roll front and tabular deposits." 

Section 4.7

Page 4.7-30: 

The liner material thickness will be about 40 mils, not 41 millimeters (approximately 1,600 

mils).

Section 4.9

Pages 4.9-41 and 4.9-42: 

There are two incorrect line returns in Section 4.9.6.5. The Table number after these 

incorrect returns should be bold.

Section 4.18

Page 4.18-7:

This section discusses the storage and handling of solid 11(e)(2) byproduct materials. The 

sentence saying “The materials would be temporarily stored on-site in containers called

‘super-sacs’” should be edited to include strong tight containers as a storage method for these 

materials.

Section 8.0

Page 8-21

There is a vertical line on the right side of the page above the Reed, 1988 reference. This 

line should be removed.

Glossary

Page G-7:

The term “pump test” is listed twice. The second definition is more descriptive. In the first 

sentence of the definition, “form” should be “from”.
Appendix F

Page F-38:

The response at the top of the page states that lek count data has been added to Table 3.8-3 in 

the FEIS. This table that was updated is Table 3.8-4, and the text should be corrected to 

reflect this.
### **CHAPTER 11B—CHEMICAL WEAPONS**

Sec.
229.
Prohibited activities.
229A.
Penalties.
229B.
Criminal forfeitures; destruction of weapons.
229C.
Individual self-defense devices.
229D.
Injunctions.
229E.
Requests for military assistance to enforce prohibition in certain emergencies.
229F.
Definitions.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 101

 91

 129

 69

 69

 70

 70

 70

 68

 67

 70

 69

 81

 76

 70

 159

 266

 302

 314

 288

 316

 305

 308

 382

 382

 96

 56

 55

 55

 55

 69

 72

 65

 65

 66

 67

 66

 66

 65

 65

 66

 64

 65

 62

 62

 63

 169

 191

 178

 120

 143

 172

 197

 192

 101

 56

 54

 55

 54

 54

 84

 81

 85

 67

 68

 69

 67

 67

 66

 66

 68

 66

 70

 68

 65

 83

 216

 258

 242

 199

 230

 213

 245

 294

 252

 69

 55

 55

 54

 55

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 3, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 68

 66

 69

 57

 58

 59

 57

 57

 57

 57

 58

 57

 59

 58

 56

 67

 149

 175

 166

 139

 158

 148

 167

 198

 172

 59

 50

 50

 49

 50

TOTAL 3,577

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
# Official Journal L 189/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 189 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6428 May 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 189

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6428 May 2021

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2021/817 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2021 establishing Erasmus+: the Union Programme for education and training, youth and sport and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1288/2013 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2021/818 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2021 establishing the Creative Europe Programme (2021 to 2027) and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1295/2013 (
  1
  ) | 34 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2021/819 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2021 on the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (recast) (
  1
  ) | 61 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Decision (EU) 2021/820 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2021 on the Strategic Innovation Agenda of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) 2021-2027: Boosting the Innovation Talent and Capacity of Europe and repealing Decision No 1312/2013/EU (
  1
  ) | 91 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2021/817 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2021 establishing Erasmus+: the Union Programme for education and training, youth and sport and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1288/2013 (
  1
  )

1

1

*

Regulation (EU) 2021/818 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2021 establishing the Creative Europe Programme (2021 to 2027) and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1295/2013 (
  1
  )

1

34

*

Regulation (EU) 2021/819 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2021 on the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (recast) (
  1
  )

1

61

DECISIONS

*

Decision (EU) 2021/820 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2021 on the Strategic Innovation Agenda of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) 2021-2027: Boosting the Innovation Talent and Capacity of Europe and repealing Decision No 1312/2013/EU (
  1
  )

1

91

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
(No. 77-CC-1653

#### Steve Morris, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed October 5, 1977.*

Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or *251destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas v. State, 32*Ill.Ct.Cl.__, this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
Furnace 11Furnace 12 Furnace 11Furnace 12 250 276 253 251 252 279 253 254 251 279 250 249 252 278 253 253 251 264 254248 253 266 252 221 251 270 253 234 251 262 256 228 256 261 249 238 242 265 251 252 250 263 221 254 251 253 251 251 250 263 244250 250 263 243 259 239 263 245 254 251 262 244255 247 262 244253 251 263 243 255 248 263 245 254 248 228 246 253 253 266 245 253 235 264 249 253 234 261 245 252 259 261 245 252 2011 2010

259 261 245 252 254 261 245 251 252 259 245 253 252 258 244253 252 258 244251 251 260 245 252 251 259 243 252 252 245 242 252 245 255 258 244252 252 247 263 250 229 241 252 Avg. LT/Hr 250.40263.00 246.13249.61

MPCA limit (lb/LT): 0.065116.3010417.1213
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 521

 501

 499

 499

 494

 489

 490

 494

 497

 501

 510

 517

 523

 531

 531

 509

 514

 522

 522

 535

 547

 546

 545

 541

 533

 534

 536

 541

 549

 558

 567

 492

 491

 485

 483

 486

 485

 488

 490

 493

 496

 502

 511

 517

 522

 503

 505

 508

 514

 491

 471

 523

 536

 541

 530

 531

 532

 533

 534

 541

 549

 559

 501

 495

 492

 489

 491

 487

 489

 493

 495

 499

 507

 514

 520

 527

 509

 507

 510

 519

 517

 524

 540

 542

 542

 532

 532

 533

 535

 537

 545

 554

 562

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 10, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 326

 322

 320

 318

 319

 317

 318

 321

 322

 324

 329

 334

 337

 342

 331

 329

 331

 337

 336

 340

 350

 351

 351

 345

 345

 345

 347

 348

 353

 358

 363

TOTAL 16,039

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
 
                     THE HERTZ CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
   COMPUTATION OF CONSOLIDATED RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES (UNAUDITED)
 
                    (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS EXCEPT RATIOS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                              --------------------------------------------------------
                                                1996        1995        1994        1993        1992
                                              --------    --------    --------    --------    --------
<S>                                           <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Income before income taxes................    $256,569    $172,344    $162,831    $102,450    $ 31,769
Interest expense..........................     309,249     323,871     284,438     256,718     310,481
Portion of rent estimated to represent the
  interest factor.........................      69,188      75,874      88,219      76,298      86,079
                                              --------    --------    --------    --------    --------
Earnings before income taxes and fixed
  charges.................................    $635,006    $572,089    $535,488    $435,466    $428,329
                                              ========    ========    ========    ========    ========
Interest expense (including capitalized
  interest)...............................    $309,843    $325,021    $284,855    $256,866    $310,538
Portion of rent estimated to represent the
  interest factor.........................      69,188      75,874      88,219      76,298      86,079
                                              --------    --------    --------    --------    --------
Fixed charges.............................    $379,031    $400,895    $373,074    $333,164    $396,617
                                              ========    ========    ========    ========    ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges........         1.7         1.4         1.4         1.3         1.1
                                              ========    ========    ========    ========    ========
</TABLE>
### §210. Offer to procure appointive public office

Whoever pays or offers or promises any money or thing of value, to any person, firm, or corporation in consideration of the use or promise to use any influence to procure any appointive office or place under the United States for any person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 694, §210, formerly §214; renumbered §210, Pub. L. 87–849, §1(b), Oct. 23, 1962, 76 Stat. 1125; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on Title 18, U. S.C., 1940 ed., §§149 and 151 (Dec. 11, 1926, c. 3, §§1, 3, 44 Stat. 918).

Changes of style and substance were made in this section.

Term "or place" was inserted after words "appointive office" in order to give broader scope to the section and also to follow the phraseology used in similar provisions of section 202 of Title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., now section 216 [repealed] of this title. (See 46 Corpus Juris 924, where it is explained that the work "places" is used in a less technical sense than the word "offices".)

The punishment provision, added at the end of this section and section 215 [now section 211] of this title to secure uniformity of style throughout this chapter, was originally enacted as a separate section, incorporating the other two by reference. 80th Congress House Report No. 304.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 210, act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 693, related to acceptance of a bribe by a witness, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 87–849 and is substantially covered in revised section 201.

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000".
FIMSAC

October 5, 2020

5 Houston Center

1401 McKinney, Suite 1600 

Houston, TX 77010

Tel: (713) 853-2359

Fax: (713) 853-2300

Ruby@GarciaHamiltonAssociates.com

www.GarciaHamiltonAssociates.com

Awards/rankings may not represent client experiences and are not indicative of future performance. Go to www.garciahamiltonassociates.com/

Presented By:

Gilbert A. Garcia, CFA

Managing Partner
Federal Reserve Balance Sheet

QE1

QE2

QE3

QE3 

Ends

Balance Sheet

Runoff Starts

Fed T-b

Buying a

Repo O

'03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19 

Federal Reserve Balance Sheet (Weekly)
Money Supply Long Term Growth

0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%

10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%20.00%22.00%24.00%26.00%

'48 '51 '54 '57 '60 '63 '66 '69 '72 '75 '78 '81 '84 '87 '90 '93 '96 '99 '02 '05 '08 

Year Over Year % Growth Rate (Monthly)

M V = P Q

The data used to create the long-term year over year growth rate was compiled from data published by the Federal Reserve Historical M

monthly series from Jan 1948 until November 1980 was compiled from the M2SA and M2SL series and is used to calculate the year over 

After November 1980, the weekly data series for M2 is used to calculate the year over year annualized growth
§ 5.10 Public reading room. ( a ) *Electronic inspection.* ( 1 ) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2), the Department makes available for public inspection in an electronic format the following records created on or after November 1, 1996: ( i ) Final opinions and orders in adjudications;
( ii ) Statements of policy and interpretations adopted by the Department and not published in the Federal Register;
( iii ) Administrative staff manuals and instructions affecting the public; and
( iv ) Copies of all agency records regardless of form or format released to the public pursuant to a FOIA request that the Department determines are likely to be the subject of future FOIA requests or have been requested three or more times.
( 2 ) The Department currently makes the agency records described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section available for public inspection in an electronic format through its electronic reading room located on the Department's FOIA website at *http://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/leg/foia/readingroom.html .*
( b ) *Public reading room.* The Department may maintain a public reading room containing the agency records described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section. The Department's public reading room is currently located at the National Library of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Plaza Level (Level B), Washington, DC 20202-0008. To visit the public reading room, members of the public can contact the Department's FOIA Service Center via email at *EDFOIAManager@ed.gov .*
( c ) *Hard copies.* For any agency records that are not made available for public inspection in the Federal Register or pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, the Department will, upon request, provide hard copies in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(3).
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2), 20 U.S.C. 3474)
[75 FR 33510, June 14, 2010, as amended at 84 FR 67867, Dec. 12, 2019]
### §1915. Compromise of customs liabilities

Whoever, being an officer of the United States, without lawful authority compromises or abates or attempts to compromise or abate any claim of the United States arising under the customs laws for any fine, penalty or forfeiture, or in any manner relieves or attempts to relieve any person, vessel, vehicle, merchandise or baggage therefrom, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 793; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on section 1616 of title 19, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Customs Duties (June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, §616, 46 Stat. 757).

Designation of the offense as a felony was omitted as unnecessary in view of definitive section 1 of this title. (See reviser's note under section 550 of this title.)

Words "and upon conviction thereof" were also omitted as unnecessary, since punishment could not be imposed until after conviction.

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000".
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A02

- 1601

- CR

- 69 | August 19, 2016 Page 1 of 3 

### MEMORANDUM DECISION

Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D),

this Memorandum Decision shall not be

regarded as precedent or cited before any

court except for the purpose of establishing

the defense of res judicata, collateral

estoppel, or the law of the case.

A PPELLANT P RO S E

O’Shun Untha Grace

Indiana State Prison

Michigan City, Indiana A TTORNEYS FOR A PPELLEE

Gregory F. Zoeller

Attorney General of Indiana

James B. Martin

Deputy Attorney General

Indianapolis, Indiana



### I N T H E



# COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

O’Shun Untha Grace,

Appellant

- Defendant,

v.



### State of Indiana,

Appellee

- Plaintiff August 19, 2016

Court of Appeals Case No.

49A02

- 1601

- CR

- 69

Appeal from the Marion Superior

Court

The Honorable Mark D. Stoner,

Judge

Trial Court Cause No.

49G06

- 9701

- PC

- 3520

Crone, Judge.

[1] After a jury trial, O’Shun Untha Grace was sentenced to 115 years for murder,

three counts of class A felony robbery, and one count of class A felonyCourt of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A02

- 1601

- CR

- 69 | August 19, 2016 Page 2 of 3 conspiracy to commit robbery. On direct appeal, our supreme court reversed

one of the robbery convictions, reduced the remaining robbery convictions and

the conspiracy conviction to class B felonies, and remanded with instructions

“to impose a total executed sentence of 85 years (concurrent sentences of fully

enhanced 20 years for conspiracy to commit robbery and two counts of robbery

to be served consecutive to a fully enhanced 65 year term for murder).” Grace v.

State

, 731 N.E.2d 442, 446 (Ind. 2000).

[2] In December 2015, Grace filed a motion to correct erroneous sentence, which

does not appear in the record before us. The trial court denied the motion.

Grace now appeals, claiming that his sentence exceeds the statutory maximum

for an episode of criminal conduct and violates several provisions of the U.S.

Constitution. Our supreme court has held that

a motion to correct sentence may only be used to correct

sentencing errors that are clear from the face of the judgment

imposing the sentence in light of the statutory authority. Claims

that require consideration of the proceedings before, during, or

after trial may not be presented by way of a motion to correct

sentence.

Robinson v. State

, 805 N.E.2d 783, 787 (Ind. 2004). Grace’s claims require

consideration of matters outside the face of the sentencing judgment and

therefore are inappropriate for a motion to correct erroneous sentence.

Consequently, we affirm.Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A02

- 1601

- CR

- 69 | August 19, 2016 Page 3 of 3 [3] Affirmed.

Kirsch, J., and May, J., concur.