alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 628

 659

 682

 652

 624

 627

 639

 659

 664

 660

 663

 651

 644

 652

 648

 711

 693

 708

 711

 736

 719

 700

 668

 676

 681

 680

 710

 726

 716

 692

 561

 574

 579

 581

 560

 556

 577

 565

 556

 565

 536

 558

 585

 619

 567

 616

 616

 626

 624

 612

 613

 576

 600

 623

 625

 613

 640

 648

 597

 631

 604

 603

 620

 618

 604

 604

 620

 627

 622

 618

 628

 618

 628

 635

 623

 652

 670

 679

 686

 693

 676

 649

 646

 652

 651

 651

 660

 671

 654

 647

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 23, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 389

 389

 399

 398

 389

 389

 399

 403

 400

 398

 404

 398

 404

 408

 401

 419

 430

 436

 440

 444

 434

 417

 415

 419

 418

 418

 424

 431

 420

 416

TOTAL 19,209

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Martin F. Petersen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Raser Technologies, Inc. (the Registrant); and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                 |  |  |  |  |  |                                            
|---------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------
|                 |  |  | 
|January 16, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Martin F. Petersen                     
|(Date)           |  |  |  |  |  | Martin F. Petersen, Chief Financial
Officer
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

RICHMOND DIVISION 

IN RE: Case No. 

Chapter

Debtor(s)

ORDER

On ________________________, the Court issued its notice that it appeared from the 

record of previously filed cases that the debtor(s) ____________________________________ 

is/are ineligible for a discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(8), (9), or § 1328(f) in the 

instant case. The notice further instructed that any objections contesting the record must be 

filed with the clerk within 21 days from the date of the notice. No such objections having been 

received by the Court, it is 

ORDERED that debtor(s) ______________________________________________

is/are ineligible for discharge in this case, and the clerk is instructed that a discharge as to the 

ineligible debtor(s) shall not be entered in this case. 

Date: _________________________ ___________________________________ 

 United States Bankruptcy Judge 

NOTICE OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER 

 ENTERED ON DOCKET 

 _______________________________ 

[oineldis ver. 03/13]

Ashley Nicole Wilson 16-35157-KRH

13

October 21, 2016

Ashley Nicole Wilson 

Ashley Nicole Wilson 

Feb 8 2021 /s/ Kevin R Huennekens

Feb 9 2021

Case 16-35157-KRH Doc 43 Filed 02/09/21 Entered 02/09/21 15:25:23 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
Action, dated as of October 29, 2007, pursuant to the 1997 Stock Option Plan



 EXHIBIT 10-I 
 COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY 
 PERSONNEL & ORGANIZATION COMMITTEE 
 Action Taken Pursuant to the 
 Colgate-Palmolive Company 2005 Employee Stock Option Plan and 
 Colgate-Palmolive Company 1997 Stock Option Plan 

By resolution adopted at a meeting held on October 29, 2007, the Personnel & Organization Committee (the “Committee”) of the
Board of Directors of Colgate-Palmolive Company (the “Company”), pursuant to the discretion granted to the Committee under Section 5(c) of the Colgate-Palmolive Company 2005 Employee Stock Option Plan and Section 5 of the
Colgate-Palmolive Company 1997 Stock Option Plan (collectively, the “Plans”), authorized the following method to pay the exercise price for Stock Options (as such capitalized term and all other capitalized terms used herein without
definition are defined in the applicable Plan) in addition to the other permissible methods of payment authorized under the Plans: 
 Unless
otherwise determined by the Committee, at the written request of the holder of Stock Options delivered to the Company together with the notice of exercise of Stock Options required under the applicable Plan, such holder’s obligation to pay the
exercise price for the Stock Options being exercised may be settled by the Company’s withholding from the shares of Common Stock subject to the Stock Options sufficient shares to pay such exercise price (based on the Fair Market Value) of the
Common Stock on the date such Stock Options are exercised. 
 Pursuant to the above resolution, Stock Options that have been settled in the
manner indicated above shall be counted in full against the total number of shares available for issuance under the applicable Plan, regardless of the number of shares of Common Stock issued upon settlement of such Stock Options.
(No. 77-CC-1696

#### Kenneth Shannon, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed October 27, 1977.*

Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover, the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas v. State, 32*Ill.Ct.Cl.__, this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

*256It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
CONSENT



We have issued our report dated August 30, 1996, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of Larson-Davis Incorporated
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 1996.  We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of
Larson-Davis Incorporated on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-1505, effective March 22,
1996 and File No. 333-6527, effective August 2, 1996) and on Forms S-8 (File No.
33-44784, filed December 30, 1991 and File No. 33-35751, filed July 5, 1990).


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP


GRANT THORNTON LLP

Provo, Utah
October 9, 1996
Case 17-03707-KRH    Doc 4    Filed 06/30/17    Entered 06/30/17 20:45:38    Desc Main Document      Page 1 of 2

Case 17-03707-KRH    Doc 4    Filed 06/30/17    Entered 06/30/17 20:45:38    Desc Main Document      Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 833

 923

 870

 903

 904

 976

 865

 879

 923

 905

 859

 878

 835

 880

 791

 818

 812

 733

 701

 710

 735

 736

 734

 783

 747

 681

 693

 699

 767

 671

 627

 676

 654

 654

 622

 540

 511

 495

 504

 503

 506

 470

 488

 565

 503

 503

 486

 473

 461

 435

 439

 444

 444

 452

 448

 445

 810

 830

 773

 788

 788

 845

 749

 741

 746

 700

 691

 676

 659

 687

 647

 682

 652

 626

 594

 573

 570

 561

 568

 559

 566

 521

 540

 534

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 15, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 517

 529

 494

 503

 503

 538

 479

 474

 477

 449

 443

 434

 423

 441

 416

 437

 419

 403

 383

 370

 368

 363

 367

 361

 366

 338

 350

 346

TOTAL 18,676

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
#### Carl J. Hymowitz, Appellant, v. Joseph A. Rutkin, Doing Business as United Men's Shops, et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0001134 12-FEB-2016 09:34 AM
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Helix Technology Corporation (the "Company") Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert J. Lepofsky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  | HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION         
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                       |  |                                      
|                       |  |                                      
|Date: January 30, 2004 |  | /s/ Robert J. Lepofsky               
|                       |  |                                      
|                       |  | Robert J. Lepofsky                   
|                       |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

In Re: 

Noel Antonio Hernandez Case # 19-12051-KHK 

REPORT OF DEPOSIT OF UNCLAIMED FUNDS 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3011 and 11 U.S.C. 347, the trustee 

herein submits a check, or checks, payable to the “Clerk, United States Bankruptcy Court” 

representing unclaimed funds to be deposited by the Clerk of the Court into the Treasury 

of the United States. Said funds are subject to withdrawal as provided by 28 U.S.C. 2042 

and shall not escheat under any state law. Unclaimed funds represent the dividend(s) due 

and payable to the entity identified as the original payee on the face of the enclosed 

check(s). 

PAYEE 

NOEL ANTONIO HERNANDEZ 

13208 Hawthorn Lane 

Woodbridge, VA 22193 

AMOUNT 

$5,844.95 

Dated: September 9, 2020 __/s/Thomas P. Gorman ___________ 

Thomas P. Gorman 

300 North Washington Street, Ste. 400 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

(703) 836-2226 

VSB#26421 

Case 19-12051-KHK Doc 60 Filed 09/09/20 Entered 09/09/20 10:40:05 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
#### § 370.7 What shall the designated agency do to make its services accessible?

The designated agency shall provide, as appropriate, the CAP services described in § 370.4 in formats that are accessible to clients or client-applicants who seek or receive CAP services.

(Authority: Section 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c))
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION 

IN RE: Tonia V Pollard ) CASE NO. 19-11892-KHK 

 ) 

 ) CHAPTER 13 BANKRUPTCY 

DEBTOR ) 

 ) 

NOTICE OF FINAL CURE PAYMENT

Pursuant to Federal Bankruptcy Rule 3002.1(f), the Trustee files Notice that the amount required to 

cure the default in the below claim has been paid in full. 

Name of Creditor: US Bank Trust National Association/Fay Servicing, LLC 

Trustee Claim No.: 001 

Court Claim No.: 001 

Last four (4) digits of any number used to identify the Debtor’s account: 6325

Mortgage Cure Amount: 

Amount of Allowed Pre-Petition or other Arrearage: $25,264.13

Amount Paid By Trustee $25,264.13

Monthly Ongoing Mortgage Payment is Paid: 

___ Through the Chapter 13 Trustee conduit _X__ Direct by the Debtor 

Within 21 days of the service of this Notice, the creditor must file and serve same on the 

Debtor, Debtor’s counsel and the Trustee, pursuant to Federal Bankruptcy Rule 3002.1(g), a 

Statement indicating whether it agrees that the Debtor has paid in full the amount required to cure 

the default and whether, consistent with Federal Bankruptcy Code Section 1322(b)(5), the Debtor is 

otherwise current on all the payments, or be subject to further action of the Court including possible 

sanctions. 

Dated: July 30, 2021 Respectfully Submitted:

 /s/ Thomas P. Gorman 

 Standing Chapter 13 Trustee 

Case 19-11892-KHK Doc 56 Filed 07/30/21 Entered 07/30/21 13:29:34 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on July 30, 2021, service of a true and complete copy of the above and 

foregoing pleading or paper was made upon the following by electronic service 

John C. Morgan, Jr., Esquire 

Attorney for Debtor 

New Day Legal, PLLC 

98 Alexandria Pike, Ste. 10 

Warrenton, VA 20186 

McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC 

Attorney for US Bank Trust National Association 

Attn: Michael J. McCormick, Esquire 

1544 Old Alabama Road 

Roswell, GA 30076 

McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLP 

Attorney for US Bank Trust National Association 

Attn: Daniel Alan Ross, Esquire 

777 108th Ave NE 

Suite 1895 

Bellevue, WA 98004 

and upon the following by depositing the same in the United States mail, envelopes properly addressed to 

each of them and with sufficient first-class postage affixed. 

Tonia V Pollard 

Chapter 13 Debtor 

15184 Cloverdale Road 

Woodbridge, VA 22193 

Fay Servicing, LLC 

PO Box 814609 

Dallas, TX 75381-4609 

 /s/ Thomas P. Gorman 

Thomas P. Gorman, Chapter 13 Trustee 

Case 19-11892-KHK Doc 56 Filed 07/30/21 Entered 07/30/21 13:29:34 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
!"#$!%

 


 



  &
'(


 
  
 
 
   
  
 ! 
 ! 
  
 "	 
 #$ 
 % 
 &'( 
 )

*)*+,+, 
 	
 -
  
 . 
 /	01 
  
  
 !
 
 ) 
 *-.,+,1 
 -
 !
1 
 

	

	
-
2	
2
2
 )
*),-+,
!
 

!


!
 





$

3

!


	
			 	


!
3


4!





!

0


3

	
 
	
!
!

5



6
7898&1
0	0
			


	

1

!

:




!
3

 "	
 

!
  

	
	
 !
!


 0



	
	
5


6
7898

!


!
	


	
!

		

;<1=====

!
	0
	:



0
!

	0


:>

	
	

-

?


!
3

?"	



3
	

 
	
!
!


5


6
7898&
	

?5@A


!
	


AA?B>

	
	

 !

?


!
3

?"	



3
	

 
	
!
!


5


6
7898
	

@%


!
	


AA?B







$




!
0

;<1=====

   


	&/
$#0 #

.12-3,-4-.,

&(	5
&(	


44#61	7..,800

,-9"0 0


: 40;!"$!"4<

=: 40;!"$!"<0

>1: 
-?@231A+>

Case 19-11258-KHK Doc 15 Filed 07/30/19 Entered 07/30/19 12:06:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
 



































 









































































&%

,?,,
B-.3,+C.?9

 


































B2-,:

  DD  	

   


-?1C/
$#0 #E

.12-3,-4-.,

&(	5
&(	


44#61	7..,800

,-9"0 0


:40;!"$!"4<

=: 40;!"$!"<0

>1: 
-?@231A+>

?	9-?,
C:

  DD  
   

)-,6?

.12-

&A22+2)-,6?

;4<1?
-?9?

.,0!8

6?)-?9	"" "


:/40;E;;#!44 ;

=: /40;E<44!$440

>1:-)-,A?1A@C+>

!
 
!

C




	-

!
 

C




	-


2	
2
2
1


D=
A -
1


 1
5
''DD89<EE


F87D=EG<&


7&==H====&


'

Jul 29 2019 /s/ Klinette H. Kindred

Jul 30 2019

Case 19-11258-KHK Doc 15 Filed 07/30/19 Entered 07/30/19 12:06:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
Case 19-31691-KLP Doc 18 Filed 04/26/19 Entered 04/26/19 13:51:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 15
Case 19-31691-KLP Doc 18 Filed 04/26/19 Entered 04/26/19 13:51:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 15
Case 19-31691-KLP Doc 18 Filed 04/26/19 Entered 04/26/19 13:51:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 15
Case 19-31691-KLP Doc 18 Filed 04/26/19 Entered 04/26/19 13:51:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 15
Case 19-31691-KLP Doc 18 Filed 04/26/19 Entered 04/26/19 13:51:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 15
Case 19-31691-KLP Doc 18 Filed 04/26/19 Entered 04/26/19 13:51:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 15
Case 19-31691-KLP Doc 18 Filed 04/26/19 Entered 04/26/19 13:51:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 15
Case 19-31691-KLP Doc 18 Filed 04/26/19 Entered 04/26/19 13:51:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 15
Case 19-31691-KLP Doc 18 Filed 04/26/19 Entered 04/26/19 13:51:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 15
Case 19-31691-KLP Doc 18 Filed 04/26/19 Entered 04/26/19 13:51:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 15
Case 19-31691-KLP Doc 18 Filed 04/26/19 Entered 04/26/19 13:51:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 11 of 15
Case 19-31691-KLP Doc 18 Filed 04/26/19 Entered 04/26/19 13:51:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 12 of 15
Case 19-31691-KLP Doc 18 Filed 04/26/19 Entered 04/26/19 13:51:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 13 of 15
Case 19-31691-KLP Doc 18 Filed 04/26/19 Entered 04/26/19 13:51:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 14 of 15
Case 19-31691-KLP Doc 18 Filed 04/26/19 Entered 04/26/19 13:51:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 15 of 15
(No. 77-CC-1538

#### James Jones, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed September 28, 1977.*

Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas v. State, 32*Ill.Ct.Cl.__, this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

*246It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 571

 592

 575

 593

 618

 617

 624

 666

 687

 678

 682

 722

 760

 792

 815

 826

 841

 843

 876

 878

 874

 796

 674

 600

 542

 424

 344

 327

 384

 404

 558

 573

 563

 565

 593

 604

 605

 625

 669

 671

 669

 682

 722

 758

 796

 807

 828

 839

 839

 868

 783

 682

 594

 538

 427

 345

 299

 289

 329

 361

 561

 584

 567

 573

 604

 607

 612

 642

 681

 673

 674

 701

 743

 770

 805

 817

 836

 842

 850

 874

 836

 737

 628

 557

 481

 384

 328

 305

 343

 383

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 25, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 363

 377

 366

 370

 389

 391

 394

 413

 437

 432

 433

 449

 475

 492

 513

 521

 533

 536

 541

 556

 533

 471

 404

 360

 313

 253

 219

 204

 228

 253

TOTAL 18,998

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 498

 484

 482

 503

 516

 518

 521

 605

 632

 633

 634

 661

 694

 639

 695

 608

 711

 642

 727

 641

 687

 685

 694

 743

 681

 664

 609

 592

 582

 562

 464

 466

 458

 464

 459

 473

 472

 468

 471

 472

 475

 476

 475

 473

 481

 509

 522

 524

 545

 545

 530

 557

 558

 559

 612

 608

 586

 573

 552

 541

 474

 474

 471

 484

 487

 491

 489

 505

 528

 526

 521

 537

 558

 521

 587

 548

 612

 570

 637

 593

 608

 608

 621

 628

 636

 639

 594

 584

 565

 552

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 2, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 309

 309

 307

 315

 317

 319

 318

 328

 342

 341

 338

 348

 361

 338

 379

 355

 394

 368

 410

 382

 392

 392

 400

 404

 409

 411

 383

 377

 365

 357

TOTAL 16,648

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL 

JUSTICE,

Appellant,

v.

RITA TIDWELL,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-22-00130-CV

Appeal from the

41ST Judicial District Court 

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2018dCV3019)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the 

judgment. We therefore reverse the trial court’s order and render judgment in TDCJ’s favor. We 

further order that Appellant recover from Appellee all costs of this appeal, for which let execution 

issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2023.

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
#### DELL RAPIDS INVESTMENT COMPANY, Appellant, v. RUDEN, Superintendent of Banks, Respondent.

(251 N. W. 809.)

(File No. 7551.

Opinion filed December 19, 1933.)

*Krause & Krause*and *Ervin P. Van Burén,*all of Dell Rapids, for Appellant.

*Boyce, Warren & Fairbank,*of Sioux Falls, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Finding no prejudicial error in the record, the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

All the Judges concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 893

 896

 888

 865

 857

 844

 828

 821

 802

 852

 858

 802

 853

 844

 828

 816

 868

 878

 896

 933

 908

 793

 972

 867

 910

 872

 881

 886

 852

 880

 891

 859

 857

 837

 814

 810

 797

 771

 792

 774

 761

 804

 782

 709

 656

 617

 564

 516

 500

 476

 470

 472

 476

 456

 412

 414

 410

 414

 886

 894

 871

 862

 847

 833

 818

 814

 784

 820

 833

 777

 835

 822

 763

 742

 734

 714

 655

 660

 624

 592

 664

 623

 656

 579

 590

 570

 544

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 3, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 564

 568

 554

 549

 539

 531

 522

 519

 501

 523

 531

 496

 532

 524

 488

 475

 470

 457

 421

 424

 402

 382

 426

 401

 421

 374

 381

 368

 352

TOTAL 21,406

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
### §832l. Separability

If any provision of this chapter or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance shall be held invalid, the remainder of the chapter and the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid shall not be affected thereby.

(Aug. 20, 1937, ch. 720, §13, 50 Stat. 736.)