alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.3

   WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hughes Supply, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Bearman,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date: April 18, 2003                       /s/ David Bearman
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           David Bearman
                                           Executive Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
433 P.2d 96

#### STATE of New Mexico ex rel. Harry HOWELL, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Samuel Z. MONTOYA, District Judge of the First Judicial District, State of New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 8536.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Oct. 16, 1967.

CHAVEZ, Chief Justice, and NOBLE, MOISE, COMPTON and CARMODY, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that the petition for writ of prohibition be and the same is hereby denied.
### §1910. Nepotism in appointment of receiver or trustee

Whoever, being a judge of any court of the United States, appoints as receiver, or trustee, any person related to such judge by consanguinity, or affinity, within the fourth degree—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 792; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on section 531 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Judicial Code and Judiciary (Aug. 25, 1937, ch. 777, 50 Stat. 810).

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $10,000" in last par.
No. 21736.

#### Marion H. Brown, Jr. *v.*People of the State of Colorado.

(409 P.2d 526)

Decided January 10, 1966.

Plaintiff in error, pro se.

Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy, James W. Creamer, Assistant, for defendant in error.

*18
      *En Banc.*

Mr. Chief Justice Pringle

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Marion H. Brown, Jr., brings writ of error here from a judgment of the district court for the City and County of Denver refusing to grant him relief under Rule 35 (b), Colo. R. Crim. P.

In December, 1953, Brown was convicted of first degree murder as a result of a particularly brutal homicide and the penalty was fixed at death. With the aid of assigned counsel, Brown brought writ of error and that judgment was reversed and the case remanded for a new trial. *Brown v. People,*130 Colo. 77, 273 P.2d 128.

On April 13, 1956, Brown was again convicted of first degree murder. This time the penalty was fixed at life imprisonment. Brown did not seek writ of error to this judgment. However, on October 21, 1964, Brown brought the 35(b) proceeding in question here. That petition was denied by the trial court without an evidentiary hearing.

Brown’s contention here is that the matters alleged in his 35 (b) petition, if true, entitled him to relief under *Escobedo v. Illinois,*378 U.S. 478, 84 Sup. Ct. 1758, 12 L. Ed.2d 977. In *Ruark v. People,*158 Colo. 110, 405 P.2d 751, we held that *Escobedo*does not apply retrospectively in this state to cases which have been determined before June 22, 1964, which is the date on which *Escobedo*was announced.

Since it was clearly apparent upon the face of the petition that 35(b) relief could not be granted on the grounds urged here, the trial court was correct in denying the petition without any evidentiary hearing.

The judgment is affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ARHAWN JONES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 389 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 21st day of June, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lester Wright (Impleaded), Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 51,842. (Abstract of Decision.)

First District, Second Division.

September 17, 1968.

Opinion by JUSTICE LYONS. Not to be published in full.
#### § 636.107 May contracting agencies use geographic preference in Federal-aid design-build or public-private partnership projects?

No. Contracting agencies must not use geographic preferences (including contractual provisions, preferences or incentives for hiring, contracting, proposing, or bidding) on Federal-aid highway projects, even though the contracting agency may be subject to statutorily or administratively imposed in-State or local geographical preferences in the evaluation and award of such projects.

[72 FR 45336, Aug. 14, 2007]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 10 (Friday, January 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 2713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-741]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-70,044]


Croscill Acquisition, LLC, Currently Known as Croscill Home, LLC, 
Plant No. 8, Oxford, NC; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on August 25, 2009, applicable to workers of Croscill Acquisition, LLC, 
formerly doing business as Royal Home Fashions, a subsidiary of 
Croscill, Inc., Plant No. 8, Oxford, North Carolina. The notice was 
published in the Federal Register on November 5, 2009 (74 FR 57342). 
The workers are engaged in the supply of warehousing and distribution 
services of household products, and are separately identifiable from 
workers producing samples at the same location.
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm.
    New information shows that the correct name of the subject firm 
should read Croscill Acquisition, LLC, currently known as Croscill 
Home, LLC, Plant No. 8. Some workers separated from employment at 
Croscill Acquisition, LLC had their wages reported under a separate 
unemployment insurance (UI) tax account under the name Croscill 
Acquisition, LLC currently known as Croscill Home, LLC.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to 
properly reflect this matter.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected by the 
acquisition of warehousing and distribution services from China, Turkey 
and India.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-70,044 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Croscill Acquisition, LLC, currently known as 
Croscill Home, LLC, Plant No. 8, Oxford, North Carolina, engaged in 
employment related to the supply of warehousing and distribution 
services, who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after May 25, 2009, through August 25, 2011, and all workers 
in the group threatened with total or partial separation from 
employment on date of certification through two years from the date 
of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance 
under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 4th day of January 2011.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-741 Filed 1-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7199]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Complementary & Alternative Medicine; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel; Neurophysiological and 
Pain Management with CAM Treatments.
    Date: April 5, 2011.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call)
    Contact Person: Hungyi Shau, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National 
Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 401, Bethesda, 
MD 20892, 301-402-1030, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5d1528333a2434730e353c281d333435733a322b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="064e7368617f6f28556e677346686f6e28616970">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This meeting is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting date due to scheduling conflicts.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, 
Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 21, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-7199 Filed 3-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from Idaho
Power (EX-27B) Company and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,710,696
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    105,600
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         225,589
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       379,905
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,421,790
<COMMON>                                        94,031
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      358,333
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            252,363
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 704,727
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    105,968
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           802,199
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       13,738
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  38,508
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    6,029
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 750,621
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,421,790
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,121,976
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            45,065
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     930,755
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     975,820
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        146,156
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               9,456
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 155,612
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        59,693
<NET-INCOME>                                    95,919
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      5,658
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   90,261
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        69,889
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       52,279
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         173,725
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
#### Donald Kenneth CARLSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Darlene BATES, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-2468.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 29, 2002.

Before DAUGHTREY and MOORE, Circuit Judges; SIMPSON, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Charles R. Simpson III, United States District Judge for the Western District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.

*ORDER*

Donald Kenneth Carlson appeals pro se from a district court judgment that dismissed his civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His appeal has been referred to a panel of this court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, the panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed in this case. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

In 1985, Carlson was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. He filed his civil rights complaint in 2001, primarily alleging that Michigan officials had misdated a petition for counsel in his criminal case. The district court dismissed Carlson’s civil rights case on September 17, 2001, as it was barred by the applicable statute of limitations and otherwise failed to raise a cognizable claim. *See*28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) *and*1915A. It is from this judgment that he now appeals.

We review the dismissal of this case *de novo. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth,*114 F.3d 601, 604 (6th Cir.1997). Dismissal was appropriate because Carlson did not raise a claim upon which relief may be granted. *See*28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) *and*1915A.

A three-year limitations period applies to Carlson’s civil rights action. *See McCune v. City of Grand Rapids,*842 F.2d 903, 905 (6th Cir.1988). Thus, Carlson’s claims must have accrued within three years of June 22, 2001, when his complaint was filed, or no earlier than June 22, 1998. The complaint plainly indicates that his claims accrued in 1984, when a “Jane Doe” defendant allegedly refused to allow him to *196sign and date his petition for appointed counsel. *See id.*Hence, the district court properly determined that Carlson’s case was untimely, as his claims had accrued almost seventeen years before the complaint was filed.

Carlson argues that the defendants also misprocessed counsel petitions that were filed by other individuals from 1983 through 1999. However, he lacks standing to bring a civil rights claim on behalf of these individuals. *See Newsom v. Norris,*888 F.2d 371, 381 (6th Cir.1989). Therefore, the limitations period was not effectively tolled by the defendants’ treatment of their petitions.

The district court also properly determined that Carlson’s allegations did not rise to the level of a viable civil rights claim. In this regard, we note that Carlson’s disputed petition for counsel was apparently filed during his criminal case. Thus, Carlson has not raised a cognizable civil rights claim, as he has not shown that his conviction was reversed on direct appeal or otherwise declared invalid by an appropriate tribunal. *See Heck v. Humphrey,*512 U.S. 477, 486-87, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994).

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 34(j)(2)(C), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
#### Bradley Contracting Company, Appellant, v. Henry M. Susswein, Respondent.

Motion for stay pending appeal granted, on condition that the plaintiff perfect its appeal, place the same on the June calendar and be ready for argument when reached, and give a bond in the sum of $30,000 to indemnify the defendant against loss pending the appeal; other*890wise, motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Jenks, P. J,, Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF TREASURER



I, Robert F. Aufenanger, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Excelsior Venture Partners III, LLC;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                               
|-------------------------------
|Date: September 14, 2005       
|                               
|/s/ Robert F. Aufenanger       
|Robert F. Aufenanger, Treasurer
### §7808. Territorial participation

The Secretary of State shall ensure participation in the Commission and its subsidiary bodies by American Samoa, Guam, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands to the extent allowed under United States law.

(Pub. L. 114–327, title II, §208, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1992.)
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of White Horse Resources, Inc.,
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),  the undersigned,  B.
Stephen Bailey,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: September 4, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 450

 452

 444

 440

 422

 409

 417

 407

 382

 356

 354

 383

 432

 393

 366

 333

 348

 329

 313

 308

 308

 320

 365

 397

 413

 437

 466

 459

 482

 469

 349

 336

 366

 365

 379

 380

 374

 353

 333

 316

 306

 316

 348

 326

 313

 286

 298

 279

 258

 275

 286

 279

 271

 263

 256

 285

 296

 298

 298

 298

 402

 406

 414

 413

 401

 395

 390

 376

 356

 331

 327

 352

 381

 357

 336

 313

 328

 308

 287

 290

 299

 292

 313

 323

 323

 343

 368

 348

 373

 367

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 2, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 264

 267

 272

 271

 264

 260

 257

 248

 236

 221

 218

 234

 251

 237

 224

 209

 219

 206

 193

 195

 201

 196

 209

 216

 216

 228

 243

 231

 247

 243

TOTAL 10,512

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20