alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(No. 74-CC-0075

#### Johnnie Kennedy, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois and State of Illinois Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Order filed November 23, 1977.*

Holderman, J.

This matter comes before the Court on a motion to dismiss filed by Respondent.

The motion to dismiss sets forth the following:

> “1) That a cause of action entitled *Johnnie M. Kennedy v. Clairmont Transfer Co., Warner Brick and Daniel P. Gleason,*bearing General No. 75 L 2923, and consolidated with the cause of action entitled Cecelia Costanzo, Paul Costanzo, deceased v. Steel City Cartage Co., and Johnnie Kennedy, was tate of *recently tried in the Circuit Court of Cook County in November, 1976.*

> *2) That Paul Costanzo, deceased was the State of Illinois employee, agent and servant present on behalf of the State of Illinois at the time of the occurrence which is the subject matter of this cause of action.*

> *3) That on November 29,1976, the Honorable Judge James C. Murray after hearing all the evidence in said cause, directed a verdict in behalf of Cecelia Costanzo, Administrator of the Estate of Paul Costanzo against Steel City Cartage Co. on the issue of contributory negligence on the part of Paul Costanzo, specifically finding that Paul Costanzo was, as a matter of law, not guilty of any (i.e. contributory) negligence."*

The motion to dismiss further states that the Steel City Cartage Co. vehicle was operated by the current plaintiff, Johnnie Kennedy, and that during the trial of the consolidated causes of action, a directed verdict was entered on behalf of Clairmont Transfer Company *93and Warner Brick against the plaintiff, Johnnie Kennedy.

The motion further sets forth that the Court had determined that Philip Costanzo was not guilty of any negligence and therefore, his principal, the State of Illinois, defendant in this cause, is as a matter of law, also not guilty of any negligence.

The motion further sets forth that since the State of Illinois has in effect been found not guilty by another Court of competent jurisdiction, a finding of not guilty should and must be entered herein on behalf of the State of Illinois and the State of Illinois Department of Transportation.

It appearing to the Court that the motion of Respondent is correct and that the State of Illinois has in effect been found not guilty by a Court of competent jurisdiction, motion to dismiss is hereby granted and said cause is dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

In re: * 

 * CASE NO. 19-11026-BFK

CHANTHAVY RATTANA * 

* 

Debtor * CHAPTER 13 

 

OBJECTION TO PROOF OF CLAIM 6-1 OF WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

COMES NOW, Chanthavy Rattana (the “Debtor”), by and through undersigned counsel, 

pursuant to Sections 502(a) and 502 (b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, Rules 3001 and 3007(a) of 

the Bankruptcy Rules, and objects to Proof of Claim 6-1 filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 

(“Creditor”). In support of this Objection, the Debtor respectfully shows this Honorable Court 

the following: 

1. This matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B), and this 

Court has proper subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b). 

2. Creditor filed its Proof of Claim on or about July 17, 2019, with claim for

$105,055.94 secured by Debtor’s principal residence. 

3. Creditor also included an alleged arrearage of $1389.50, approximately one 

month’s payment.

4. Undersigned counsel reviewed the payment history attached to the Proof of Claim 

and it fails to account for a payment that Debtor made on June 13, 2019. Proof of this payment is 

attached as Exhibit A.

5. On or about August 6, 2019, undersigned counsel spoke with counsel for the 

Creditor and the latter advised that they would be amending the Proof of Claim, but it does not 

appear that this has occurred yet.

WHEREFORE, the Debtor moves the Court for relief as follows: 

A. Disallowance of the $1389.50 arrearage portion of Creditor’s Proof of Claim;

B. Award Debtor’s counsel reasonable legal fees in an amount to be determined by this 

Court; and 

C. Such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. 

Case 19-11026-BFK Doc 36 Filed 09/18/19 Entered 09/18/19 07:50:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Respectfully submitted this 18th day of September 2019

/s/ Jeremy C. Huang

Jeremy C. Huang, VSB 76861

10615 Judicial Dr., Suite 102

Fairfax, VA 22030

(T) 703-755-0214 / (F) 571-285-0065

jhuang@lawfirmvirginia.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 18th day of September 2019, a copy of the foregoing 

Objection to Proof of Claim and Notice of Hearing were served via first class mail, postage 

prepaid, and/or the Court’s Electronic Court Filing system upon the Chapter 13 Trustee and the 

following parties:

Mary F. Balthasar-Lake

Shapiro & Brown, LLP

501 Independence Parkway, Suite 203

Chesapeake, VA 23320

Attorney for the Creditor

/s/ Jeremy C. Huang

Case 19-11026-BFK Doc 36 Filed 09/18/19 Entered 09/18/19 07:50:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
#### Ramapo Manufacturing Company, Respondent, v. Julia Pierson Mapes, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that the verdict that the land was not included in the conveyance by plaintiff is sustained by the weight of evidence and there was no evidence of adverse possession that warranted the submission of that issue. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Harry West, Respondent, against E. A. Scott Wood et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. J. Francis Dunn, Appellant, against Walter B. Martin, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Respondent.

All concur.
### §1203. Hostage taking

(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, seizes or detains and threatens to kill, to injure, or to continue to detain another person in order to compel a third person or a governmental organization to do or abstain from doing any act as an explicit or implicit condition for the release of the person detained, or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be punished by imprisonment for any term of years or for life and, if the death of any person results, shall be punished by death or life imprisonment.

(b)(1) It is not an offense under this section if the conduct required for the offense occurred outside the United States unless—

(A) the offender or the person seized or detained is a national of the United States;

(B) the offender is found in the United States; or

(C) the governmental organization sought to be compelled is the Government of the United States.

(2) It is not an offense under this section if the conduct required for the offense occurred inside the United States, each alleged offender and each person seized or detained are nationals of the United States, and each alleged offender is found in the United States, unless the governmental organization sought to be compelled is the Government of the United States.

(c) As used in this section, the term "national of the United States" has the meaning given such term in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22)).

(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §2002(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2186; amended Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7028, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4397; Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, §60003(a)(10), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1969; Pub. L. 104–132, title VII, §723(a)(1), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1300.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–132 inserted "or conspires" after "attempts".

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–322 inserted before period at end "and, if the death of any person results, shall be punished by death or life imprisonment".

1988—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 100–690 substituted "(c) As" for "(C) As".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §2003, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2186, provided that: "This part [part A (§§2001–2003) of chapter XX of title II of Pub. L. 98–473, enacting this section and provisions set out as a note under section 1201 of this title] and the amendments made by this part shall take effect on the later of—

"(1) the date of the enactment of this joint resolution [Oct. 12, 1984]; or

"(2) the date the International Convention Against the Taking of Hostages has come into force and the United States has become a party to that convention [the convention entered into force June 6, 1983; and entered into force for the United States Jan. 6, 1985]."
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                 HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                            DEBT SECURITIES RATINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                         Standard          Moody's
                                         & Poor's        Investors
                                      Corporation          Service      Fitch Inc.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Household Finance Corporation
<S>                                   <C>                <C>            <C>
   Senior debt                                  A               A2              A
   Senior subordinated debt                   A-                A3              A-
   Commercial paper                           A-1              P-1              F-1
Household Bank (Nevada) N.A.
   Senior debt                                  A               A2              A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
### §757g. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–146, §3(a), Dec. 16, 1997, 111 Stat. 2677

Section, Pub. L. 89–304, §7, as added Pub. L. 96–118, §4, Nov. 16, 1979, 93 Stat. 859; amended Pub. L. 97–453, §14(b)(3), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2492; Pub. L. 98–613, §10(a), Oct. 31, 1984, 98 Stat. 3190; Pub. L. 99–432, §6, Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 990; Pub. L. 100–589, §3, Nov. 3, 1988, 102 Stat. 2984; Pub. L. 102–130, §3, Oct. 17, 1991, 105 Stat. 626, related to striped bass population studies.
Furnace 11 Furnace 12 Furnace 11 Furnace 12

250 276 253 251

252 279 253 254

251 279 250 249

252 278 253 253

251 264 254 248

253 266 252 221

251 270 253 234

251 262 256 228

256 261 249 238

242 265 251 252

250 263 221 254

251 253 251 251

250 263 244 250

250 263 243 259

239 263 245 254

251 262 244 255

247 262 244 253

251 263 243 255

248 263 245 254

248 228 246 253

253 266 245 253

235 264 249 253

234 261 245 252

259 261 245 252

2011 2010

259 261 245 252

254 261 245 251

252 259 245 253

252 258 244 253

252 258 244 251

251 260 245 252

251 259 243 252

252 245 242

252 245 255

258 244 252

252 247

263 250

229

241

252

Avg. LT/Hr 250.40 263.00 246.13 249.61

MPCA limit 

(lb/LT):

0.0651 16.30104 17.1213
§ 300.196 Filing requirements. ( a ) Any written submission under § 300.194 must be filed by hand-delivery, by mail, or by facsimile transmission. The Secretary discourages the use of facsimile transmission for documents longer than five pages.
( b ) The filing date under paragraph (a) of this section is the date the document is— ( 1 ) Hand-delivered;
( 2 ) Mailed; or
( 3 ) Sent by facsimile transmission.
( c ) A party filing by facsimile transmission is responsible for confirming that a complete and legible copy of the document was received by the Department.
( d ) If a document is filed by facsimile transmission, the Secretary or the hearing officer, as applicable, may require the filing of a follow-up hard copy by hand-delivery or by mail within a reasonable period of time.
( e ) If agreed upon by the parties, service of a document may be made upon the other party by facsimile transmission.
( f ) A party must show a proof of mailing to establish the filing date under paragraph (b)(2) of this section as provided in 34 CFR 75.102(d).
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(f)(3))
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0254 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ANDREW ORLANDO BIGLEGGINS ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT** Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until September 13, 2021, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court August 16 2021

08/16/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0254
### §1853. Trees cut or injured

Whoever unlawfully cuts, or wantonly injures or destroys any tree growing, standing, or being upon any land of the United States which, in pursuance of law, has been reserved or purchased by the United States for any public use, or upon any Indian reservation, or lands belonging to or occupied by any tribe of Indians under the authority of the United States, or any Indian allotment while the title to the same shall be held in trust by the Government, or while the same shall remain inalienable by the allottee without the consent of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 787; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §601(a)(8), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3498.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §104 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §50, 35 Stat. 1098; June 25, 1910, ch. 431, §6, 36 Stat. 857).

Reference to persons aiding or procuring was deleted as unnecessary since such persons are made principals by section 2 of this title.

Maximum fine was increased from $500 to $1,000 to conform to other comparable sections of this chapter. (See sections 1851 and 1852 of this title.)

Minor changes were also made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–294 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000".
### §2293. Bar to prosecution

(a) In General.—It is a bar to prosecution under this chapter if—

(1) the conduct in question occurred within the United States in relation to a labor dispute, and such conduct is prohibited as a felony under the law of the State in which it was committed; or

(2) such conduct is prohibited as a misdemeanor, and not as a felony, under the law of the State in which it was committed.

(b) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) Labor dispute.—The term "labor dispute" has the same meaning given that term in section 13(c) of the Act to amend the Judicial Code and to define and limit the jurisdiction of courts sitting in equity, and for other purposes (29 U.S.C. 113(c), commonly known as the Norris-LaGuardia Act).

(2) State.—The term "State" means a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, and any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 109–177, title III, §306(a), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 239.)
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

IN RE: )

)

Giovanna Rose Reid ) Case No. 19-11622-BFK

 ) Chapter 7

Debtor, )

 )

 MOTION TO REOPEN CASE FOR ENTRY OF DISCHARGE

Giovanna Rose Reid, by counsel, hereby moves this Court to reopen her Chapter 7 case

for the purpose of filing her certification of completion of a post-petition financial management

course so that a discharge can be entered, and respectfully states as follows:

1. The Debtor filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 7 on May 16, 2019.

2. Debtor’s case was closed without discharge on September 19, 2019 for failure to file a

Certificate of Completion of Financial Management Course.

3. Debtor has been going through an eviction which distracted her from timely completing

the course. The post-petition instruction course on personal financial management was

completed by Debtor on October 8, 2019.

WHEREFORE, Debtor respectfully requests that this Court reopen the Debtor’s case so

that a discharge can be entered.

Case 19-11622-BFK Doc 31 Filed 10/18/19 Entered 10/18/19 11:27:10 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Ashvin Pandurangi

Ashvin Pandurangi, Bar #86966

AP Law Group, PLC

211 Park Ave.

Falls Church, VA 22046

Tel: (571) 969-6540

Fax: (571) 699-0518

Counsel for Debtor

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this 18th day of October, 2019 served a true copy of the

foregoing Motion to Reopen Case by electronic mail and electronically pursuant to this Court’s

CM/ECF procedures to John P. Fitzgerald, III, U.S. Trustee, and to the Chapter 7 Trustee, Janet

M. Meiburger.

John P. Fitzgerald, III

ustpregion04.ax.ecf@usdoj.gov

Janet M. Meiburger

trustee@meiburgerlaw.com

/s/ Ashvin Pandurangi

Ashvin Pandurangi

Case 19-11622-BFK Doc 31 Filed 10/18/19 Entered 10/18/19 11:27:10 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 543

 533

 550

 538

 535

 538

 473

 675

 627

 690

 703

 616

 568

 570

 605

 571

 596

 585

 568

 492

 524

 540

 542

 531

 520

 504

 532

 533

 468

 482

 463

 486

 441

 421

 392

 394

 497

 538

 542

 503

 476

 461

 468

 466

 460

 455

 456

 445

 458

 462

 467

 474

 491

 494

 501

 490

 501

 504

 502

 516

 491

 488

 429

 548

 570

 610

 603

 545

 515

 495

 496

 494

 501

 488

 482

 463

 473

 481

 493

 492

 504

 498

 519

 507

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2022 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 1, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 326

 327

 326

 335

 319

 318

 281

 355

 368

 393

 389

 353

 334

 322

 323

 321

 326

 318

 314

 302

 308

 313

 321

 320

 327

 324

 337

 329

TOTAL 14,208

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Fritz Wilhelm Haug, Respondent, against John Pfortsch, Jr., et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**SECTION      1350 CERTIFICATION**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   /s/                Craig A. Rogerson                                           |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Craig                A. Rogerson                                                           |
| President                and Chief Executive Officer February                28, 2007 |
|                                                                                       |
### §3496. Regulations by President as to commissions, fees of witnesses, counsel and interpreters

The President is authorized to prescribe regulations governing the manner of executing and returning commissions by consular officers under the provisions of sections 3492–3494 of this title and schedules of fees allowable to witnesses, foreign counsel, and interpreters under section 3495 of this title.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 836.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on section 695g of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Judicial Code and Judiciary (June 20, 1936, ch. 640, §8, 49 Stat. 1564).

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Ex. Ord. No. 10307. Delegation of Authority

Ex. Ord. No. 10307, Nov. 23, 1951, 16 F.R. 11907, provided:

By virtue of the authority vested in me by the act of August 8, 1950, 64 Stat. 419 (3 U.S.C. Supp. 301–303), I hereby delegate to the Secretary of State (1) the authority vested in the President by section 3496 of title 18 of the United States Code (62 Stat. 836) to prescribe regulations governing the manner of executing and returning commissions by consular officers under the provisions of sections 3492–3494 of the said title, and schedules of fees allowable to witnesses, foreign counsel, and interpreters under section 3495 of the said title, and (2) the authority vested in the President by section 3492(c) of title 18 of the United States Code (62 Stat. 835) to prescribe regulations making the provisions of sections 3492–3496 of the said title applicable to diplomatic officers.

Executive Order No. 8298 of December 4, 1939, entitled "Regulations Governing the Manner of Executing and Returning Commissions by Officers of the Foreign Service in Criminal Cases, and Schedule of Fees and Compensation in Such Cases", is hereby revoked.
### §470d. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §104, Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 917; Pub. L. 96–515, title II, §204, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2994, related to loan insurance program for preservation of property included on National Register. See section 303901 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
### §1071. Concealing person from arrest

Whoever harbors or conceals any person for whose arrest a warrant or process has been issued under the provisions of any law of the United States, so as to prevent his discovery and arrest, after notice or knowledge of the fact that a warrant or process has been issued for the apprehension of such person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; except that if the warrant or process issued on a charge of felony, or after conviction of such person of any offense, the punishment shall be a fine under this title, or imprisonment for not more than five years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 755; Aug. 20, 1954, ch. 771, 68 Stat. 747; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), (K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, §4003(a)(3), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1811.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §246 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §141, 35 Stat. 1114).

Section 246 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was divided. Part is in this section and the remainder is incorporated in section 752 of this title.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–273 substituted "fine under this title" for "fine of under this title".

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "under this title" for "not more than $1,000" after "person, shall be fined" and for "not more than $5,000" after "shall be a fine of".

1954—Act Aug. 20, 1954, increased the penalty from 6 months to 1 year where the violator harbored a person for whom process has been issued on a misdemeanor charge and inserted the penalty provision where the violation occurred after a person has been convicted of any offense or where a process has been issued for a felony.