alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105 - 2498 **ME MORA**  **NDUM** SUBJECT: Heavy- Duty Hy brid Onboard Diagnostics FROM: Am y Kopin TO: The Docket DATE: July

15 , 2011 

### On April 28 th, 2011 we held a conference call with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to discuss concerns raised by hy brid manufacturers, engine manufacturers, and related industry trade groups regarding heavy - duty onboard diagnostic (OBD) requirements and timing. C oncerns were raised during the comment period for the heavy- duty greenhouse gas notice of proposed rulemakin g that heavy - duty hy brid applications may

not be able to meet the 2013 heavy - duty

OBD regulations that were published in the 2009 OBD Final Rulemaking . 1 , 2 

### Specifically , their comments include a request for a delay of the application of HD OBD requirements for hy

brid applications until 2020. Attendees from the EPA and CARB are shown in the table below. **Attendee Affiliation**  Cleophas Jackson EPA

– Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division Anthony Neam EPA

– Assessment and Standards Division Amy Kopin EPA

– Assessment and Standards Division Lucina Negrete CARB Jack Kitowski CARB Michael McCarthy CARB Joe Calavita CARB Jessica Dean CARB Michael Regenfuss CARB Ajay Chaudhary CARB 1 U.S. EPA, NHTSA, and DOT, “Greenhouse Gas Emission Stan dards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium and Heavy - Duty Engines and Vehicles,” republished December 29, 2010. Available here: http://origin.www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR - 2010 - 12 - 29/html/2010 - 32726.htm 2 U.S. EPA, “Control of Air Pollution from New Moto r Vehicles and New Motor Vehicles Engines; Final Rule Regulations Requiring Onboard Diagnostic Systems on 2010 and Later Heavy - Duty Engines Used in Highway Applications Over 14,000 Pounds; Revisions to Onboard Diagnostic Requirements for Diesel Highway Heavy - Duty Vehicles Under 14,000 Pounds ,” published February 24, 2009. Available here: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/im/obd/regtech/hd - obd - frm - 02 - 24 - 09 - notice - 74 - fr - 8310.pdf OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
#### Emily H. Ketchum, appellant, v. Columbia Harrison et al., Impleaded with Charles B. Marsh, appellee.

Filed October 16, 1901.

No. 10,435.

When the Transcript Is Fatally Defective, the Decree Will Be Affirmed. At the time of confirmation of sale in a mortg'age foreclosure proceeding an order was entered giving to a party the right to cultivate, harvest, and remove the crops planted by him on the premises sold, from which the plaintiff!, being the purchaser, appeals. No transcript of the pleading's forming the issues in the case or of the findings and decree at the time of the rendition of the decree of foreclosure being preserved in the record presented, we are unable to determine whether the order complained of is within the issues tried and determined, and therefore affirm the same.

Appeal from tlie district court for Buffalo county. Heard below before Sullivan, J.

*Affirmed.*

*Warren Pratt,*for appellant.

*B. 0. Hontctlcr, contra.*

Holcomb, J.

At tbe time of entry of tlie final order of confirmation of a sale of real estate made in proceedings of foreclosure of a mortgage on tlie premises sold, the court made the following additional order or decree: “It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed by the court that the defendant Charles B. Marsh, the grantee of the defendants Columbia and Sarah M. Harrison, is to have the right to cultivate, harvest and remove the crops now growing on said land and planted by him.”

The plaintiff who purchased the premises at the foreclosure sale appeals from that part of the final order or decree which is quoted. The record upon which we are asked to pass upon the question consists of a transcript of an order of sale issued on the decree of the district court in the action, and the subsequent proceedings had thereunder.

*710No evidence appears to have been submitted at the time of confirmation of sale and the entry of the order complained of. No transcript of the pleadings forming the issues in the case or of the findings and decree at the time of the rendition of the decree of foreclosure is presented, and whether or not the order complained of is within the issues tried and determined in that action we are unable to say from the record brought to this court, and we are therefore precluded from passing upon the question thus raised and presented.

The right of the party in whose favor the order was made to the use of the land for the crop season mentioned may have been superior to the interest of the mortgagee or the purchaser at the foreclosure sale, and may have been so found and determined in the prior proceedings, and the question thus tried may have been altogether within the issues raised by the pleadings, from all that appears from the record upon which we are asked to decide the correctness of the order excepted to.

For the reasons stated the order and decree is

Affirmed.
§ 222.91 What requirements must a local educational agency meet to receive a payment under section 7003 of the Act for children residing on Indian lands? ( a ) To receive a payment under section 7003 of the Act for children residing on Indian lands, an LEA must— ( 1 ) Meet the application and eligibility requirements in section 7003 and subparts A and C of these regulations;
( 2 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, develop and implement policies and procedures in accordance with § 222.94; and
( 3 ) Include in its application for payments under section 7003— ( i ) An assurance that the LEA established these policies and procedures in consultation with and based on information from tribal officials and parents of those children residing on Indian lands who are Indian children, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section;
( ii ) An assurance that the LEA has provided a written response to the comments, concerns and recommendations received through the Indian policies and procedures consultation process, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section; and
( iii ) Either a copy of the policies and procedures, or documentation that the LEA has received a waiver in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) An LEA is not required to comply with § 222.94 with respect to students from a tribe that has provided the LEA with a waiver that meets the requirements of this paragraph. ( 1 ) A waiver must contain a voluntary written statement from an appropriate tribal official or tribal governing body that— ( i ) The LEA need not comply with § 222.94 because the tribe is satisfied with the LEA's provision of educational services to the tribe's students; and
( ii ) The tribe was provided a copy of the requirements in § 222.91 and § 222.94, and understands the requirements that are being waived.
( 2 ) The LEA must submit the waiver at the time of application.
( 3 ) The LEA must obtain a waiver from each tribe that has Indian children living on Indian lands claimed by the LEA on its application under section 7003 of the Act. If the LEA only obtains waivers from some, but not all, applicable tribes, the LEA must comply with the requirements of § 222.94 with respect to those tribes that did not agree to waive these requirements.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1810-0036) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7703(a), 7704)
[81 FR 64743, Sept. 20, 2016]
January 12, 2012

The Honorable Lisa P. Jackson Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20460

Dear Administrator Jackson:

As leading public health and medical organizations, we write to request that you move forward with the Tier 3 vehicle emission and gasoline standards and finalize these standards as soon as possible. Thes e new health protections are urgently needed as milli ons of Americans live in communities where polluted

air threatens their health and motor vehicles remai n a major source of this pollution.

On May 21, 2010, President Obama issued a memorandu m that directed you to review the adequacy of current regulations of nitrogen oxides, air toxics and gasoline sulfur standards for new motor vehicle s and if needed, to promulgate emissions regulations. It is clear that such new standards are needed to protect public health and are extremely cost effect ive.

According to a National Association of Clean Air Ag encies study, a Tier 3 vehicle and fuels standard

would reduce overall mobile source emissions of nit rogen oxides by 29%, carbon monoxide by 38% and volatile organic compounds by 26% by 2030. The stat e air pollution officials’ analysis indicates that, in 2017, Tier 3 will reduce nitrogen oxide emissions b y 260,000 tons, the equivalent to taking 33 million

cars off our nation’s roads. These benefits are a great bargain for the American people, costing less than one cent per gallon of gasoline and about 1⁄2 of a pe rcent, or $150, of the cost of the average new car.

As communities work to provide clean and healthy ai r to their residents, these reductions are urgently needed to protect the health of all, but especially the most vulnerable; children, seniors and people with chronic lung and heart disease. To protect public health, we ask that you move forward now with the

Tier 3 vehicle and fuel standards.

Sincerely,

Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America

American Heart Association American Lung Association American Thoracic Society Health Care Without Harm Physicians for Social Responsibility

Trust for America's Health

cc: Nancy Sutley, Chair, Council on Environmental Quality Heather Zichal, Deputy Assistant to the President fo r Energy and Climate Change Bob Perciasepe, Deputy Administrator, US EPA Gina McCarthy, Assistant Administrator, Office of A ir and Radiation, US EPA Margo Oge, Director, Office of Transportatio n and Air Quality, US EPA
### §8–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 85–767, §2 [33], Aug. 27, 1958, 72 Stat. 919

Section, act Sept. 7, 1950, ch. 912, §4(a), 64 Stat. 787, related to administration of appropriations for construction, reconstruction, and improvement of roads and trails in national parks, monuments, and other areas administered by National Park Service.

Act Sept. 5, 1940, ch. 715, §8, 54 Stat. 870, which was formerly classified to this section, was repealed by Pub. L. 85–767, §2[23], Aug. 27, 1958, 72 Stat. 919.
### §838. Congressional findings; authority and duties of Secretary of Energy relating to Federal Columbia River Power System unaffected

(a) Congress finds that in order to enable the Secretary of Energy to carry out the policies of Public Law 88–552 [16 U.S.C. 837 et seq.] relating to the marketing of electric power from hydroelectric projects in the Pacific Northwest, Public Laws 89–448 and 89–561 relating to use of revenues of the Federal Columbia River Power System to provide financial assistance to reclamation projects in the Pacific Northwest, the treaty between the United States and Canada relating to the cooperative development of the resources of the Columbia River Basin, and other applicable law, it is desirable and appropriate that the revenues of the Federal Columbia River Power System and the proceeds of revenue bonds be used to further the operation, maintenance, and further construction of the Federal transmission system in the Pacific Northwest.

(b) Other than as specifically provided herein, the present authority and duties of the Secretary of Energy relating to the Federal Columbia River Power System shall not be affected by this chapter. The authority and duties of the Administrator referred to herein are subject to the supervision and direction of the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 93–454, §2, Oct. 18, 1974, 88 Stat. 1376; Pub. L. 95–91, title III, §302(a)(1)(D), Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 578.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Public Law 88–552, referred to in subsec. (a), is act Aug. 31, 1964, 78 Stat. 756, which is classified generally to chapter 12F (§837 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

Public Law 89–448, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 89–448, §§1–3, June 14, 1966, 80 Stat. 200, which enacted sections 835j and 835k of this title and amended section 832h of this title.

Public Law 89–561, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 89–561, §§1–6, Sept. 7, 1966, 80 Stat. 707, which enacted sections 835l and 835m of this title and section 1962d–6 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, and amended sections 835j and 835k of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 93–454, §1, Oct. 18, 1974, 88 Stat. 1376, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Federal Columbia River Transmission System Act'."

#### Transfer of Functions

"Secretary of Energy" substituted in text for "Secretary of the Interior" pursuant to Pub. L. 95–91, §302(a)(1)(D), which is classified to section 7152(a)(1)(D) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

Functions of Secretary of the Interior with respect to Bonneville Power Administration transferred to Secretary of Energy by section 7152(a)(1)(D), (2) of Title 42, with Bonneville Power Administration to be preserved as a distinct organizational entity within Department of Energy and headed by an Administrator.
#### § 463.120 What are the program-specific requirements in the Unified State Plan for the Employment Service program authorized under the Wagner-Peyser Act, as amended by Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act title III?

The Employment Service program authorized under the Wagner-Peyser Act of 1933, as amended by WIOA title III, is subject to requirements in sec. 102(b) of WIOA, including any additional requirements imposed by the Secretary of Labor under secs. 102(b)(2)(C)(viii) and 102(b)(2)(D)(iv) of WIOA, as explained in joint planning guidelines issued by the Secretaries of Labor and Education.
### §1463. Mailing indecent matter on wrappers or envelopes

All matter otherwise mailable by law, upon the envelope or outside cover or wrapper of which, and all postal cards upon which, any delineations, epithets, terms, or language of an indecent, lewd, lascivious, or obscene character are written or printed or otherwise impressed or apparent, are nonmailable matter, and shall not be conveyed in the mails nor delivered from any post office nor by any letter carrier, and shall be withdrawn from the mails under such regulations as the Postal Service shall prescribe.

Whoever knowingly deposits for mailing or delivery, anything declared by this section to be nonmailable matter, or knowingly takes the same from the mails for the purpose of circulating or disposing of or aiding in the circulation or disposition of the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 769; Pub. L. 91–375, §6(j)(13), Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 778; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed. §335 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §212, 35 Stat. 1129).

Said section 335 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was incorporated in this section and section 1718 of this title.

Reference to persons causing or procuring was omitted as unnecessary in view of definition of "principal" in section 2 of this title.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000" in last par.

1970—Pub. L. 91–375 substituted "Postal Service" for "Postmaster General".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 91–375 effective within 1 year after Aug. 12, 1970, on date established therefor by Board of Governors of United States Postal Service and published by it in Federal Register, see section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 39, Postal Service.
# Official Journal C 263/10 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 263 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6010 August 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 263

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6010 August 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 263/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — sixth supplement to the 35th complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 263/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — sixth supplement to the 35th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 2,154

 1,868

 1,619

 1,702

 1,676

 1,927

 2,100

 2,772

 3,000

 2,669

 2,505

 2,981

 2,734

 2,829

 2,488

 2,310

 2,941

 3,890

 4,788

 5,220

 5,404

 6,358

 5,876

 7,582

 8,209

 8,907

 6,715

 6,513

 5,372

 5,348

 5,227

 197

 159

 136

 133

 135

 134

 130

 131

 139

 161

 151

 161

 173

 192

 217

 222

 344

 694

 583

 465

 511

 338

 293

 312

 310

 506

 619

 708

 664

 952

 1,107

 1,011

 916

 691

 591

 507

 556

 653

 818

 939

 946

 936

 1,100

 1,114

 1,228

 1,262

 1,235

 1,334

 1,662

 2,023

 2,247

 2,647

 2,521

 2,477

 2,625

 2,864

 3,494

 3,119

 3,164

 2,862

 3,046

 3,003

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 2, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Cody

Clark

Dubois

Meeteetse

Cooke City

Legend

Roads

Crucial Winter Range

WYO recommended no surface development

Oil & Gas

Private

Suitable for surface development

Not suitable for surface development

Legally withdrawn from development

0 5 10 15 Miles

±

Crucial Winter Range,

Availabliity for

Oil & Gas Development,

and Wyoming Recommendations
(No. 78-CC-1749

#### Kenneth Stephenson, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed December 4, 1978.*

*885Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas v. State, 32*Ill.Ct.Cl.__, this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
### §1118. Murder by a Federal prisoner

(a) Offense.—A person who, while confined in a Federal correctional institution under a sentence for a term of life imprisonment, commits the murder of another shall be punished by death or by life imprisonment.

(b) Definitions.—In this section—

"Federal correctional institution" means any Federal prison, Federal correctional facility, Federal community program center, or Federal halfway house.

"murder" means a first degree or second degree murder (as defined in section 1111).

"term of life imprisonment" means a sentence for the term of natural life, a sentence commuted to natural life, an indeterminate term of a minimum of at least fifteen years and a maximum of life, or an unexecuted sentence of death.

(Added Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, §60005(a), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1970.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 1118 was renumbered section 1122 of this title.
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 499 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and 

Entrepreneurship 

AN ACT 

To amend the Small Business Act to clarify the treatment 

of certain surviving spouses under the definition of small 

business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled 

veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 499 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Service-Disabled Vet3 erans Small Business Continuation Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT REGARDING TREATMENT 

5 OF CERTAIN SURVIVING SPOUSES UNDER 

6 THE DEFINITION OF SMALL BUSINESS CON7 CERN OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY SERV8 ICE-DISABLED VETERANS. 

9 Effective on the date specified in subsection (e) of 

10 section 1832 of the National Defense Authorization Act 

11 for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 

12 2660), section 3(q)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 

13 U.S.C. 632(q)) is amended— 

14 (1) in subparagraph (C)(i)(II), by striking 

15 ‘‘rated as 100 percent’’ and all that follows through 

16 ‘‘service-connected disability’’; and 

17 (2) by amending subparagraph (C)(ii)(III) to 

18 read as follows: 

19 ‘‘(III) the date that— 

20 ‘‘(aa) in the case of a surviving 

21 spouse of a veteran with a service-con22 nected disability rated as 100 percent 

23 disabling or who dies as a result of a 

24 service-connected disability, is 10 

25 years after the date of the death of 

26 the veteran; or 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 499 RFS

1 ‘‘(bb) in the case of a surviving 

2 spouse of a veteran with a service-con3 nected disability rated as less than 

4 100 percent disabling who does not 

5 die as a result of a service-connected 

6 disability, is 3 years after the date of 

7 the death of the veteran.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 13, 

2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### American Lime Corporation, Respondent, v. Harry Schnell et al., Individually and as Copartners under the Name of H. Schnell & Company, Appellants, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Martin, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant the motion.