alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4719 

To amend the Federal share of the fishing safety standards grants. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 17, 2019 

Mr. GOLDEN (for himself and Mr. YOUNG) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal share of the fishing safety standards 

grants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Funding Instruction 

5 for Safety, Health, and Security Avoids Fishing Emer6 gencies Act’’ or the ‘‘FISH SAFE Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT OF FEDERAL SHARE OF THE FISHING 

8 SAFETY STANDARDS GRANTS. 

9 (a) AMENDMENT.—Section 4502 of title 46, United 

10 States Code, is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4719 IH

1 (1) in subsection (i)(3), by striking ‘‘50’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘75’’; and 

3 (2) in subsection (j)(3), by striking ‘‘50’’ and 

4 inserting ‘‘75’’. 

5 (b) RETROACTIVE EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amend6 ment made by subsection (a) takes effect on the day after 

7 the date of enactment of the Frank LoBiondo Coast 

8 Guard Authorization Act of 2018 (Public Law 115–282). 

9 SEC. 3. REIMBURSEMENT. 

10 Amounts appropriated to carry out section 4502 of 

11 title 46, United States Code, under the Consolidated Ap12 propriations Act, 2017 (Public Law 115–31), shall be 

13 available until not later than September 30, 2020, in order 

14 for the Secretary of Health and Human Services to pro15 vide a reimbursement or supplement to a recipient of a 

16 grant under the Fishing Safety Training Grants Program 

17 under section 4502(i) of title 46, United States Code, or 

18 the Fishing Safety Research Grant Program under section 

19 4502(j) of title 46, United States Code, in an amount that 

20 is equal to, for any non-Federal share provided by such 

21 grant recipient under such Program that is more than 25 

22 percent, the amount of such excess non-Federal share ex23 pended or included in the approved budget by such grant 

24 recipient. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4719 IH

1 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS AMEND2 MENTS. 

3 Section 4502 of title 46, United States Code, is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (i)(4), by striking ‘‘2019’’ and 

6 inserting ‘‘2021’’; and 

7 (2) in subsection (j)(4), by striking ‘‘2019’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘2021’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
### **CHAPTER 105—SABOTAGE**

Sec.
2151.
Definitions.
2152.
Fortifications, harbor defenses, or defensive sea areas.
2153.
Destruction of war material, war premises or war utilities. 1

2154.
Production of defective war material, war premises or war utilities. 1
2155.
Destruction of national-defense materials, national-defense premises, or national-defense utilities.
2156.
Production of defective national-defense material, national-defense premises, or national-defense utilities.
[2157.
Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §601(f)(11), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3500, substituted ", or" for "or" in items 2155 and 2156.

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330004(13), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2142, struck out item 2157 "Temporary extension of sections 2153 and 2154".

**1954**—Act Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1261, §106, 68 Stat. 1219, amended items 2153 to 2156 generally.

**1953**—Act June 30, 1953, ch. 175, §1, 67 Stat. 133, added item 2157.

1  So in original. Does not conform to section catchline.
EXHIBIT 19

Hoffnalge, G. – Accuracy of Visibility Protocol 

Modeling in BART Evaluations
PPL MONTANA, LLC COMMENTS

PROPOSED REGIONAL HAZE FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA

Docket ID No. EPA-R08-OAR-2011-0851

Exhibit 19
ATTACHMENT 3

Accuracy of Visibility Protocol Modeling in BART

Evaluations, prepared by Gale F. Hoffnagle,

TRC Environmental Corporation, June 15, 2012

Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
Exhibit 19
### §2. Principals

(a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.

(b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 684; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, §17b, 65 Stat. 717.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §550 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §332, 35 Stat. 1152).

Section 2(a) comprises section 550 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., without change except in minor matters of phraseology.

Section 2(b) is added to permit the deletion from many sections throughout the revision of such phrases as "causes or procures".

The section as revised makes clear the legislative intent to punish as a principal not only one who directly commits an offense and one who "aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures" another to commit an offense, but also anyone who causes the doing of an act which if done by him directly would render him guilty of an offense against the United States.

It removes all doubt that one who puts in motion or assists in the illegal enterprise but causes the commission of an indispensable element of the offense by an innocent agent or instrumentality, is guilty as a principal even though he intentionally refrained from the direct act constituting the completed offense.

This accords with the following decisions: Rothenburg v. United States, 1918, 38 S. Ct. 18, 245 U.S. 480, 62 L. Ed. 414, and United States v. Hodorowicz, C. C. A. Ill. 1939, 105 F. 2d 218, certiorari denied, 60 S. Ct. 108, 308 U.S. 584, 84 L. Ed. 489. United States v. Giles, 1937, 57 S. Ct. 340, 300 U.S. 41, 81 L. Ed. 493, rehearing denied, 57 S. Ct. 505, 300 U.S. 687, 81 L. Ed. 888.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1951—Subsec. (a). Act Oct. 31, 1951, inserted "punishable as".

Subsec. (b). Act Oct. 31, 1951, inserted "willfully" before "causes", and "or another" after "him", and substituted "is punishable as a principal" for "is also a principal and punishable as such".
§ 345.51 Inmate pay. ( a ) *Grade levels.* Inmate workers in FPI locations receive pay at five levels ranging from 5th grade pay (lowest) to 1st grade pay (highest).
( b ) *Eligibility.* ( 1 ) An inmate shall accrue vacation time, longevity service credit, and shall receive holiday pay for the period of time the inmate is officially assigned to the Industries work detail. For limitations on claims, refer to § 345.66.
( 2 ) Inmate workers may be eligible for premium pay as specified in § 345.52. Eligibility for other pay and benefits are described separately in this subpart.
( 3 ) FPI pay and benefits are lost in cases of disciplinary transfer and segregation.
( 4 ) An inmate returned to the institution due to program failure at a Community Corrections Center or while on parole or escape is not entitled to credit for time spent in Industries prior to said program failure. This rule also applies to any other program failure which results in a break in confinement status.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 835

 847

 746

 821

 811

 821

 777

 706

 656

 613

 667

 571

 586

 672

 717

 757

 432

 458

 470

 464

 681

 550

 474

 470

 464

 464

 470

 464

 479

 469

 320

 341

 325

 330

 308

 305

 293

 294

 285

 299

 307

 321

 353

 279

 274

 273

 307

 417

 426

 419

 458

 423

 450

 413

 346

 427

 450

 432

 425

 439

 542

 554

 455

 535

 521

 509

 508

 476

 434

 377

 449

 422

 478

 420

 425

 379

 405

 438

 446

 441

 568

 463

 466

 431

 401

 454

 462

 450

 462

 457

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 19, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 351

 358

 297

 347

 338

 331

 330

 310

 284

 249

 293

 277

 311

 276

 279

 250

 266

 287

 292

 289

 367

 302

 304

 282

 264

 297

 302

 294

 302

 298

TOTAL 13,828

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of IDACORP, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, (the"Report"), I, Darrel T. Anderson, Senior Vice President -Administrative Services and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifythat:

(1)              The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| */s/Darrel T. Anderson*                         |
|-------------------------------------------------|
| Darrel T. Anderson                              |
| Senior Vice President - Administrative Services |
| and Chief Financial Officer                     |
| February 28, 2008                               |

----
§ 226.21 How may charter schools use these funds? ( a ) Charter schools that receive grant funds through their State must use the funds for facilities. Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, allowable expenditures include: ( 1 ) Rent.
( 2 ) Purchase of building or land.
( 3 ) Construction.
( 4 ) Renovation of an existing school facility.
( 5 ) Leasehold improvements.
( 6 ) Debt service on a school facility.
( b ) Charter schools may not use these grant funds for purchasing land when they have no immediate plans to construct a building on that land.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7221d(b))
1

Brown, Kelly

Subject: FW: Ozone comments for planned meeting with Janet McCabe

From: kellferg@gmail.com [mailto:kellferg@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Kelly Ferguson 

Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 3:42 PM 

To: Sasser, Erika 

Cc: Stone, Susan 

Subject: Re: Ozone comments for planned meeting with Janet McCabe 

Hi Erika, That's great news--I'm happy to hear that you will be in on the conversation. Looking forward to 

talking with you as well. 

Kelly 

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Sasser, Erika <Sasser.Erika@epa.gov> wrote: 

Hello Kelly—

Thank you for your comments on the ozone proposal. We were aware of your upcoming meeting with Janet McCabe 

on May 4, and we were planning to participate in that briefing, so there is no need to schedule a separate time. We 

will be glad to hear your thoughts on the proposal. Susan will make sure all the materials are reflected in the docket as 

well.

Thanks for reaching out, and we look forward to talking with you on May 4.

Erika

_________________

Erika N. Sasser, Ph.D.

Director, Health and Environmental Impacts Division

Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards, U.S. EPA

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, MD C504-02, RTP, NC 27711

(919) 541-3889 sasser.erika@epa.gov
2

From: kellferg@gmail.com [mailto:kellferg@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Kelly Ferguson 

Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 12:40 PM 

To: Sasser, Erika 

Cc: Stone, Susan 

Subject: Ozone comments for planned meeting with Janet McCabe

 

Hi Dr. Sasser--

My name is Kelly Ferguson and I'm a member of the Detroit Reproductive Advocacy Matters (DREAM) team involved in the Reach the 

Decision Makers Program. Our group is interested in advocating for pregnant women residing in sensitive or vulnerable communities who 

are exposed to multiple factors that put them at increased risk of effects of air pollutant exposure. We have recently submitted comments in 

response to the proposed ozone rule (see attached), and are planning a trip to meet with Janet McCabe on May 4 to discuss them. 

We are particularly interested in including pregnant women and communities exposed to multiple risk factors simultaneously in the 

finalized federal register, and because of their omission in the HREA and ISA processes we support the lower range (60-65ppm) of the 

proposed standard. I've attached "one-pagers' summarizing our arguments and the state of the science to support them. 

I've spoken with Susan Stone about our meeting with Janet, and just wanted to let you know about it as well since you play such an integral 

role in this process. If you would be interested in talking on the phone to discuss our comments my team would welcome that opportunity. 

Best wishes--

Kelly Ferguson

-- 

Kelly K. Ferguson, PhD 

Research Fellow 

Department of Environmental Health Sciences 

University of Michigan School of Public Health
(No. 73-CC-240

#### Scientific Products, Division of American Hospital Supply Corp., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Registration and Education, Respondent.

*Opinion filed October 11, 1973.*

Scientific Products, Division of American Hospital Supply Corporation, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul. R. Wexler and Edward L. S. Arkema, Assistant Attorneys General, for Respondent.

*88Per Curiam.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean TDS

1 612 518 569 368

2 604 549 576 372

3 604 568 580 374

4 610 583 596 384

5 651 574 614 395

6 646 574 609 392

7 647 580 615 396

8 651 625 639 411

9 670 628 653 420

10 697 643 673 432

11 688 641 664 426

12 694 657 673 432

13 697 668 681 437

14 712 670 689 442

15 718 705 711 455

16 723 698 706 452

17 717 695 704 451

18 726 696 710 455

19 718 693 700 449

20 736 699 722 462

21 704 672 684 439

22 684 655 670 430

23 671 635 659 423

24 659 632 647 416

25 647 620 630 405

26 650 626 637 410

27 644 627 637 410

28 633 619 625 402

29 622 609 618 398

30 608 588 601 387

31 591 577 585 378

Total 20077

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Check 20 

Period: January 2024 Run Date: 2/7/2024
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 694

 682

 658

 754

 730

 700

 796

 727

 727

 705

 734

 721

 745

 768

 769

 734

 698

 694

 600

 602

 588

 572

 500

 461

 477

 515

 548

 575

 614

 634

 659

 671

 605

 592

 664

 676

 640

 702

 668

 685

 682

 683

 667

 667

 729

 736

 651

 646

 587

 566

 566

 555

 509

 404

 412

 453

 465

 458

 436

 442

 434

 437

 682

 640

 613

 726

 693

 670

 754

 687

 707

 692

 711

 698

 707

 749

 749

 675

 669

 628

 585

 580

 573

 553

 459

 433

 461

 488

 512

 507

 526

 535

 550

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 4, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 437

 412

 395

 465

 444

 430

 482

 441

 453

 444

 455

 447

 453

 479

 479

 433

 429

 404

 378

 374

 370

 358

 300

 284

 301

 318

 332

 329

 341

 347

 356

TOTAL 19,212

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
### §726. Acts prohibited in refuge; commercial fishing

No person shall, except in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Interior in respect of wild birds, game animals, fur-bearing animals, wild flowers, and aquatic plants, or in respect of fish and other aquatic-animal life—

(a) Enter the refuge for any purpose; or

(b) Disturb, injure, kill, or remove, or attempt to disturb, injure, kill, or remove any wild bird, game animal, fur-bearing animal, fish, or other aquatic-animal life, on the refuge; or

(c) Remove from the refuge, or injure or destroy thereon any flower, plant, tree, or other natural growth, or the nest or egg of any wild bird; or

(d) Injure or destroy any notice, sign board, fence, building, or other property of the United States thereon.

Commercial fishing may, however, be conducted in the waters of this refuge under regulation by the Secretary of the Interior.

(June 7, 1924, ch. 346, §§6, 7, 43 Stat. 651; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. II, §4(e), (f), eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2731, 53 Stat. 1433.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is a combination of sections 6 and 7 of act June 7, 1924, the last sentence only being from section 7.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of certain enforcement functions of Secretary or other official in Department of the Interior under this chapter to Federal Inspector, Office of Federal Inspector for the Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System, and subsequent transfer to Secretary of Energy, then to Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects, see Transfer of Functions note set out under section 725 of this title.

Transfer of functions of Secretary of Agriculture and Secretary of Commerce to Secretary of the Interior by Reorg. Plan No. II of 1939, see Transfer of Functions note set out under section 723 of this title.
### **CHAPTER 93—PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES**

Sec.
1901.
Collecting or disbursing officer trading in public property.
1902.
Disclosure of crop information and speculation thereon.
1903.
Speculation in stocks or commodities affecting crop insurance.
[1904.
Repealed.]
1905.
Disclosure of confidential information generally.
1906.
Disclosure of information from a bank examination report.
1907.
Disclosure of information by farm credit examiner.
[1908.
Repealed.]
1909.
Examiner performing other services.
1910.
Nepotism in appointment of receiver or trustee.
1911.
Receiver mismanaging property.
1912.
Unauthorized fees for inspection of vessels.
1913.
Lobbying with appropriated moneys.
[1914.
Repealed.]
1915.
Compromise of customs liabilities.
1916.
Unauthorized employment and disposition of lapsed appropriations.
1917.
Interference with civil service examinations.
1918.
Disloyalty and asserting the right to strike against the Government.
1919.
False statement to obtain unemployment compensation for Federal service.
1920.
False statement or fraud to obtain Federal employees' compensation.
[1921.
Repealed.]
1922.
False or withheld report concerning Federal employees' compensation.
1923.
Fraudulent receipt of payments of missing persons.
1924.
Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2020**—Pub. L. 116–260, div. O, title X, §1003(e), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2156, struck out item 1921 "Receiving Federal employees' compensation after marriage".

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §604(b)(44), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3509, substituted "employees' " for "employee's" in item 1920.

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–359, title VIII, §808(b), Oct. 14, 1994, 108 Stat. 3454, added item 1924.

Pub. L. 103–333, title I, §101(b)(2), Sept. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 2548, substituted "or fraud to obtain Federal employee's compensation" for "to obtain Federal employees' compensation" in item 1920.

Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330004(11), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2141, struck out items 1904 "Disclosure of information or speculation in securities affecting Reconstruction Finance Corporation" and 1908 "Disclosure of information by National Agricultural Credit Corporation examiner".

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXV, §3556, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4927, substituted "from a bank examination report" for "by bank examiner" in item 1906 and struck out item 1914 "Salary of Government officials and employees payable only by United States".

**1966**—Pub. L. 89–554, §3(c), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 608, added items 1916 to 1923.
Exhibit A

Asset Purchase Agreement

Case 19-10725-KHK Doc 124-1 Filed 12/16/19 Entered 12/16/19 08:39:36 Desc

Exhibit A - Asset Purchase Agreement Page 1 of 16
Case 19-10725-KHK Doc 124-1 Filed 12/16/19 Entered 12/16/19 08:39:36 Desc

Exhibit A - Asset Purchase Agreement Page 2 of 16
Case 19-10725-KHK Doc 124-1 Filed 12/16/19 Entered 12/16/19 08:39:36 Desc

Exhibit A - Asset Purchase Agreement Page 3 of 16
Case 19-10725-KHK Doc 124-1 Filed 12/16/19 Entered 12/16/19 08:39:36 Desc

Exhibit A - Asset Purchase Agreement Page 4 of 16
Case 19-10725-KHK Doc 124-1 Filed 12/16/19 Entered 12/16/19 08:39:36 Desc

Exhibit A - Asset Purchase Agreement Page 5 of 16
Case 19-10725-KHK Doc 124-1 Filed 12/16/19 Entered 12/16/19 08:39:36 Desc

Exhibit A - Asset Purchase Agreement Page 6 of 16
Case 19-10725-KHK Doc 124-1 Filed 12/16/19 Entered 12/16/19 08:39:36 Desc

Exhibit A - Asset Purchase Agreement Page 7 of 16
Case 19-10725-KHK Doc 124-1 Filed 12/16/19 Entered 12/16/19 08:39:36 Desc

Exhibit A - Asset Purchase Agreement Page 8 of 16
Case 19-10725-KHK Doc 124-1 Filed 12/16/19 Entered 12/16/19 08:39:36 Desc

Exhibit A - Asset Purchase Agreement Page 9 of 16
Case 19-10725-KHK Doc 124-1 Filed 12/16/19 Entered 12/16/19 08:39:36 Desc

Exhibit A - Asset Purchase Agreement Page 10 of 16
Case 19-10725-KHK Doc 124-1 Filed 12/16/19 Entered 12/16/19 08:39:36 Desc

Exhibit A - Asset Purchase Agreement Page 11 of 16
Case 19-10725-KHK Doc 124-1 Filed 12/16/19 Entered 12/16/19 08:39:36 Desc

Exhibit A - Asset Purchase Agreement Page 12 of 16
Case 19-10725-KHK Doc 124-1 Filed 12/16/19 Entered 12/16/19 08:39:36 Desc

Exhibit A - Asset Purchase Agreement Page 13 of 16
Case 19-10725-KHK Doc 124-1 Filed 12/16/19 Entered 12/16/19 08:39:36 Desc

Exhibit A - Asset Purchase Agreement Page 14 of 16
Case 19-10725-KHK Doc 124-1 Filed 12/16/19 Entered 12/16/19 08:39:36 Desc

Exhibit A - Asset Purchase Agreement Page 15 of 16
Case 19-10725-KHK Doc 124-1 Filed 12/16/19 Entered 12/16/19 08:39:36 Desc

Exhibit A - Asset Purchase Agreement Page 16 of 16
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 14 - 00352 - CR IN RE B.J. ALLEN GAL LOWAY , RELATOR OPINION ON ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS September 29 , 2014 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Pending before the court is B.J. Allen Galloway’s “Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody.” The petition is addressed to the Seventh District of Texas, Criminal Division but appears on a form used to pursue habeas relief in federal courts
. Through the document, Galloway seeks to set aside a final conviction in Cause No. 66,255 rendered by the district court for the 108th Judicial District, Potter County , Texas , by contending that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. We dismiss the petition. One seeking to set aside a final conviction via a habeas corpus petition filed in state court must do so pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. More importantly , w e have no jurisdiction over article 11.07 proceedings.2

T EX . C ODE C RIM . P ROC . A NN . art. 11.07 (West Supp. 201 4 ); see Runnels v. State, 804 S.W.2d 278 (Tex. Ap p. — Beaumont 1991, no pet.); see also Watson v. State, 96 S.W.3d 497, 500 (Tex. App.
— Amarillo 2002, pet. ref’d) (holding that courts of appeal lack the authority to issue original writs of habeas corpus in other than certain civil matters); T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 22.221 ( West 2004) (providing the authority to issue certain writs). Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Per Curiam Do not publish.
### §1716D. Nonmailable injurious animals, plant pests, plants, and illegally taken fish, wildlife, and plants

A person who knowingly deposits for mailing or delivery, or knowingly causes to be delivered by mail, according to the direction thereon, or at any place at which it is directed to be delivered by the person to whom it is addressed, anything that section 3015 of title 39 declares to be nonmailable matter shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both.

(Added Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXII, §320108(b)(1), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2113.)