alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4908 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit the collection of a health care copayment by the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs from a veteran who is a member of 

an Indian tribe. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4908 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Native American Vet3 eran Parity in Access to Care Today Act’’ or ‘‘Native 

4 American PACT Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON COLLECTION OF A HEALTH CARE 

6 COPAYMENT BY THE SECRETARY OF VET7 ERANS AFFAIRS FROM A VETERAN WHO IS A 

8 MEMBER OF AN INDIAN TRIBE. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1730A of title 38, United 

10 States Code, is amended— 

11 (1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘catastroph12 ically disabled’’ and inserting ‘‘certain’’; 

13 (2) by inserting ‘‘(a) PROHIBITION.—’’ before 

14 ‘‘Notwithstanding’’; 

15 (3) by striking ‘‘a veteran who is catastroph16 ically disabled, as defined by the Secretary,’’ and in17 serting ‘‘a covered veteran’’; and 

18 (4) by adding at the end the following new sub19 section: 

20 ‘‘(b) COVERED VETERAN DEFINED.—In this section, 

21 the term ‘covered veteran’ means a veteran who— 

22 ‘‘(1) is catastrophically disabled, as defined by 

23 the Secretary; or 

24 ‘‘(2) is an Indian or urban Indian, as those 

25 terms are defined in section 4 of the Indian Health 
3 

•HR 4908 EH

1 Care Improvement Act (Public Law 94–437; 25 

2 U.S.C. 1603).’’. 

3 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

4 at the beginning of chapter 17 of such title is amended 

5 by striking the item relating to section 1730A and insert6 ing the following: 

‘‘1730A. Prohibition on collection of copayments from certain veterans.’’. 

7 (c) DELAYED EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments 

8 made by this section shall take effect on the day that is 

9 one year after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 22, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4908 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit 

is a member of an Indian tribe. Secretary of Veterans Affairs from a veteran who the collection of a health care copayment by the
### §460nnn–62. Administration of Wilderness Area

#### (a) General rule

The Secretary shall administer the Wilderness Area in accordance with this part and the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.). Any reference in the Wilderness Act to the effective date of that Act (or any similar reference) shall be deemed to be a reference to October 30, 2000.

#### (b) Wilderness boundaries along roads

Where a wilderness boundary exists along a road, the wilderness boundary shall be set back from the centerline of the road, consistent with the Bureau of Land Management's guidelines as established in its Wilderness Management Policy.

#### (c) Access to non-Federal lands

The Secretary shall provide reasonable access to private lands within the boundaries of the Wilderness Area, as provided in section 460nnn–22(d) 1 of this title.

#### (d) Grazing

#### (1) Administration

Except as provided in section 460nnn–23(e)(2) of this title, grazing of livestock shall be administered in accordance with the provision of section 4(d)(4) of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1133(d)(4)), in accordance with the provisions of this subchapter, and in accordance with the guidelines set forth in Appendices A and B of House Report 101–405 of the 101st Congress.

#### (2) Retirement of certain permits

The Secretary shall permanently retire all grazing permits applicable to certain lands in the Wilderness Area, as depicted on the map referred to in section 460nnn–11(a) of this title, and livestock shall be excluded from these lands.

(Pub. L. 106–399, title II, §202, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1666.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Wilderness Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 88–577, Sept. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 890, which is classified generally to chapter 23 (§1131 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1131 of this title and Tables.

The effective date of the Wilderness Act, referred to in subsec. (a), means Sept. 3, 1964, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 88–577, which enacted chapter 23 of this title.

This subchapter, referred to in subsec. (d)(1), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 106–399, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1655, known as the Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Act of 2000, which is classified generally to this subchapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 460nnn of this title and Tables.

1 So in original. Probably should be section "460nnn–22(e)".
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 77063 / February 4, 2016

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-15982

In the Matter of

MORGAN STANLEY AND CO. LLC;

MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I 

INC.;

and MORGAN STANLEY MORTGAGE

CAPITAL HOLDINGS LLC

Respondents.

ORDER APPOINTING FUND

PLAN ADMINISTRATOR AND

SETTING ADMINISTRATOR

BOND AMOUNT

On July 24, 2014, the Commission issued an order (“Order”) finding that Morgan Stanley 

and Co. LLC, Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc., and Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital 

Holdings LLC (“Respondents”) violated the federal securities laws.1 Pursuant to the Order, 

Respondents paid disgorgement of $160,627,852, prejudgment interest of $17,995,437, and a 

civil money penalty of $96,376,711 to the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Order also 

created a Fair Fund for distribution to harmed investors pursuant to Section 308(a) of the 

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended. 

 

1 Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933, Making 

Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order, Securities Act Release No. 9617 (July 24, 2014).
The Division of Enforcement now seeks the appointment of Garden City Group, LLC

(“GCG”) as the fund plan administrator and requests that the administrator’s bond be set at 

$275,000,000. GCG is included in the Commission’s approved pool of administrators.

Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 1105(a), it is hereby ORDERED that GCG is appointed as 

the fund plan administrator and shall obtain a bond in accordance with Rule 1105(c) in the 

amount of $275,000,000.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.2

Brent J. Fields

Secretary

 

2

17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(17).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                      
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000789944
<NAME>                        SENETEK PLC
<MULTIPLIER>  1000
       
<S>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                             2,975
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                        771
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                        1,657
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   5,629
<PP&E>                             1,182
<DEPRECIATION>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     9,841
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              3,578
<BONDS>                                0
<COMMON>                           3,533
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<OTHER-SE>                         2,730
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       9,841
<SALES>                            6,486
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   6,589
<CGS>                              3,640
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     10,552
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    57
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    4,020
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                4,020
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                       4,020
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                        .10
        



</TABLE>
### §831. Creation; short title

For the purpose of maintaining and operating the properties now owned by the United States in the vicinity of Muscle Shoals, Alabama, in the interest of the National defense and for agricultural and industrial development, and to improve navigation in the Tennessee River and to control the destructive flood waters in the Tennessee River and Mississippi River Basins, there is created a body corporate by the name of the "Tennessee Valley Authority" (hereinafter referred to as the "Corporation"). The Board of Directors first appointed shall be deemed the incorporators, and the incorporation shall be held to have been effected from the date of the first meeting of the Board. This chapter may be cited as the "Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933."

(May 18, 1933, ch. 32, §1, 48 Stat. 58; Pub. L. 108–447, div. C, title VI, §603(a), Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 2966.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Pub. L. 108–447 substituted "Board of Directors" for "board of directors" and "Board" for "board".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2004 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 108–447 effective on the later of the date on which at least three persons nominated under section 604(a) of Pub. L. 108–447 take office or May 18, 2005, see section 604(b) of Pub. L. 108–447, set out in an Appointments; Effective Date; Transition note under section 831a of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 185

 203

 236

 257

 298

 338

 342

 340

 335

 397

 421

 436

 415

 441

 328

 307

 321

 330

 342

 381

 371

 295

 259

 254

 276

 318

 368

 315

 279

 273

 265

 162

 169

 182

 178

 175

 170

 170

 167

 163

 160

 164

 162

 161

 163

 161

 162

 153

 154

 157

 159

 158

 163

 165

 168

 174

 176

 186

 188

 191

 193

 196

 169

 184

 201

 208

 226

 250

 240

 247

 217

 240

 264

 278

 269

 283

 225

 210

 203

 212

 214

 233

 238

 219

 204

 206

 223

 244

 272

 239

 220

 232

 225

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 1, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 120

 130

 140

 145

 156

 171

 164

 169

 150

 164

 179

 188

 182

 191

 155

 146

 141

 147

 148

 160

 163

 151

 142

 143

 154

 167

 184

 164

 152

 159

 155

TOTAL 7,095

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENTTOARTICLES OF INCORPORATIONOFHeavenexpress.com, Inc.(present name)Unknown(Document Number of Corporation (If known)Pursuant to the provisions of section 607.1006, Florida Statutes, this Florida profit corporation adopts the following articles of amendment to its articles of incorporation:FIRST:Amendment(s) adopted:(indicate article number(s) being amended, added or deleted)Article I of the Articles of Incorporation of the corporation is amended in its entirety to change the name of the corporation, as follows:The name of the corporation (Corporation) is Golden Sand Eco-Petroleum, Inc.
 
 
 
 SECOND:If an amendment provides for an exchange, reclassification or cancellation of issued shares, provisions for implementing the amendment if not contained in the amendment itself, are as follows:
 
  
 THIRD:The date of each amendments adoption: June 26, 2003FOURTH: Adoption of Amendment(s) (CHECK ONE)
 
 þ
The amendment(s) was/were approved by the shareholders. The number of votes cast for the amendment(s) was/were sufficient for approval. ̈
The amendment(s) was/were approved by the shareholders through voting groups.The following statement must be separately provided for each voting group entitled to vote separately on the amendment(s):The number of votes cast for the amendment(s) was/were sufficient for approval by(voting group) ̈
The amendment(s) was/were adopted by the board of directors without shareholder action and shareholder action was not required. ̈
The amendment(s) was/were adopted by the incorporators without shareholder action and shareholder action was not required.
 
 Signed this 1st day of September, 2003Signature: /s/ Charles Scheuerman(By the chairman pr Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors, President or other officer if adopted by the shareholders)OR(By a director if adopted by the directors)OR(By an incorporator if adopted by the incorporators)Charles Scheuerman(Typed or printed name)Chairman(Title)
-, -^ ^ — — , 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSFORATION 

. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

K • 

In the Matter of: 

AIR EVAC, INC. [sic] 

FAA CASE NO.: 2007CE030008 

y. «»';/ ' '^y 

HEARING DATE REQUEST 

The undersigned counsel for the Respondent is planning to be on an out-of-state 

vacation for a family reunion from June 9, 2010 through June 18, 2010 and therefore 

requests that the hearing not be scheduled until June 28, 2010 at the earliest. 

Respectfully submitted, 

COOLING & BERBERS 

Street, Suite 2400 

Kansas City, MO 64105 

Telephone: (816)474-0777 

Facsimile: (816)472-0790 

iramsev(a),coolinglaw.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT 

AIR EVAC EMS, INC. 

2007CE030008 
>-- •'^-* 

I CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on the y'day of May 2010,1 forwarded the original and one 

(1) copy of the foregoing Hearing Date Request via United States Mail, Certified, Return 

Receipt Requested to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2W1000 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Additionally one (1) copy of the foregoing Answer to Complaint was forwarded 

via United States mail, certified, return receipt requested to: 

Mark G. Camacho 

Senior Enforcement Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

901 Locust, Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 

F:\Cases\FAA ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS\AIR EVAC\Pleadings\2007CE030008\Hearing Date Request.April 30.2010.doc 

FAA CASE NO.: 2007CE030008
#### Josephine C. Wilson et al., Appellants and Respondents, v. Jaybro Realty & Development Co., Inc., Appellant, and Manhattan Food Stores, Inc., Defendant-Respondent.

Present — Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 187

 196

 217

 178

 191

 184

 201

 199

 158

 162

 168

 169

 168

 168

 169

 178

 180

 182

 183

 181

 181

 182

 184

 186

 189

 192

 193

 193

 197

 200

 155

 147

 146

 157

 168

 169

 172

 158

 154

 155

 162

 167

 167

 166

 166

 170

 175

 178

 179

 180

 180

 181

 179

 181

 187

 189

 191

 192

 193

 198

 169

 169

 175

 170

 177

 173

 183

 177

 156

 159

 164

 168

 167

 167

 168

 173

 177

 180

 181

 181

 181

 181

 182

 185

 188

 190

 192

 193

 195

 198

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 7, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 120

 120

 124

 121

 125

 123

 129

 125

 112

 114

 117

 120

 119

 119

 120

 123

 125

 127

 128

 128

 128

 128

 128

 130

 132

 133

 135

 135

 137

 138

TOTAL 5,319

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
§ 222.151 When is an administrative hearing provided to a local educational agency? ( a ) Any local educational agency (LEA) that is adversely affected by the Secretary's (or the Secretary's delegatee's) action or failure to act upon the LEA's application under the Act is entitled to an administrative hearing in accordance with this subpart.
( b ) An applicant is entitled to an administrative hearing under this subpart only if— ( 1 ) The applicant files a written request for an administrative hearing within 60 days of its receipt of written notice of the adverse action; and
( 2 ) The issues of fact or law specified in the hearing request are material to the determination of the applicant's rights and are not committed wholly to the discretion of the Secretary.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7711(a))
[60 FR 50778, Sept. 29, 1995, as amended at 62 FR 35418, July 1, 1997; 80 FR 33170, June 11, 2015]
#### Jack R. HYDE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R. D. MASSEY, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 78-1783.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 30, 1979.

*250Jack R. Hyde, pro se.

Edward R. Downing, Miami, Fla. (Court-appointed), for petitioner-appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Robert L. Bogen, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, Fla., for respondent-appellee.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judge, and CAMPBELL *, District Judge.

*

 District Judge of the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner Jack R. Hyde was convicted in the state courts of Florida for first degree arson and for breaking and entering with intent to commit grand larceny. His convictions were affirmed on direct appeal, *Hyde v. State,*Fla.App., 1976, 341 So.2d 1103. He subsequently brought this federal habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The District Court adopted the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate and denied relief. We affirm.

In this habeas petition, Hyde argues that the state trial court erred in refusing to suppress a handwritten confession, composed and signed by Hyde about three hours after he had been arrested. Hyde argues first that he was so intoxicated at the time of this confession that he was incapable of voluntarily and knowingly waiving his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights. The District Court found that his argument was belied by the transcript from the state suppression hearing, and that finding is not' clearly erroneous. Hyde’s second argument is that the handwritten confession was obtained in violation of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel and the precepts of *Miranda v. Arizona,*1966, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694. At the beginning of the interview at which Hyde gave his confession, he was read his *Miranda*rights; he gave no indication that he wanted an attorney present and at the end of his confession he wrote that he understood his rights, knew what he was doing, and was giving his statement freely. In these circumstances, Hyde’s confession was properly admitted, notwithstanding the fact that earlier in the evening, just after his arrest, he had requested and spoken to an attorney. *See Michigan v. Mosely,*1975, 423 U.S. 96, 96 S.Ct. 321, 46 L.Ed.2d 313.

AFFIRMED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 13,989

 14,605

 15,699

 16,024

 16,605

 17,628

 16,566

 14,594

 13,784

 12,157

 11,036

 11,701

 13,335

 15,678

 15,041

 16,327

 8,699

 4,544

 4,004

 1,582

 1,035

 753

 555

 333

 294

 276

 296

 326

 309

 298

 276

 5,435

 5,615

 5,484

 5,533

 4,804

 5,346

 5,332

 5,090

 4,735

 4,504

 4,168

 3,042

 3,303

 4,539

 3,598

 1,407

 256

 227

 177

 186

 144

 164

 189

 173

 161

 174

 151

 167

 176

 193

 174

 9,011

 9,629

 9,930

 9,751

 9,812

 10,224

 10,157

 9,115

 8,785

 8,379

 7,622

 6,790

 7,715

 9,134

 8,509

 9,894

 4,277

 2,351

 1,543

 609

 573

 516

 379

 257

 227

 199

 192

 206

 201

 214

 224

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 16, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
No. 12,364.

#### Royal Exchange Assurance *v.*George Tritch Hardware Company et al.

Decided October 14, 1929.

Rehearing denied November 4, 1929.

Mr. S. M. True, for plaintiff in error.

*369Messrs. Blount, Silverstein *&*Rosner, Mr. Lowell White, Mr. F. L. Grant, for defendants in error.

*In Department.*

Mr. Justice Adams

delivered the opinion of the court.

The George Tritch Hardware Company, one of the defendants in error, sued Peter Fox on a money demand, and caused attachment to issue. Other creditors, also defendants in error, intervened and procured attachments. Final judgments against Fox followed and the attachments were sustained. Garnishee summons was served on Royal Exchange Assurance, the plaintiff in error. It answered under oath and admitted that it owed Fox the sum of $3,173.48. It later asked leave to withdraw the answer, and to file an amended and substituted answer denying the debt, based on alleged discovery of fraud. The court denied the request and on motion ordered judgment against the garnishee on its admission of liability to Fox. The garnishee assigns error and asks for a supersedeas.

1. There are three assignments of error, but they all go to one point, the refusal tó allow the amendment. The application therefor was based on affidavits; also certified copies of transcripts of judgments against Fox rendered many years, before in another court, and a purported deposition, which does not appear to have been taken on notice or offered in evidence. None of these are a part of the record unless made so by bill of exceptions, but there is no such bill, nor the slightest attempt thereat. It precludes the consideration of the matters which the garnishee values, and leaves the record disclosing a valid judgment against the garnishee, based on its answer under oath. It calls for an affirmance. Concerning the necessity for a bill of exceptions, see *Weir v. Campbell,*67 Colo. 531, 186 Pac. 526; *Horne v. Redman,*69 Colo. 214, 193 Pac. 548; *Phoenix Indemnity Co.*
      *370
      *v. Greger,*39 Colo. 193, 88 Pac. 1066; *Lockard v. Lockard,*74 Colo. 583, 223 Pac. 28; Code 1921, §420; Supreme Court Rule 10.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Whitford, Mr. Justice Campbell and Mr. Justice Alter concur.