alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 97008 / March 1, 2023

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-20003

In the Matter of

Unikrn, Inc.,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

ENTER AN ORDER APPROVING OR 

DISAPPROVING PLAN OF 

DISTRIBUTION

On January 13, 2023, pursuant to Rule 1103 of the United States Securities and Exchange 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans (the “Commission’s Rules”), 

17 C.F.R.§ 201.1103, the Commission published a Notice of Proposed Plan of Distribution and 

Opportunity to Comment (“Notice”)1for the distribution of monies placed into a Fair Fund in the 

above-captioned matter. The Notice invited public comment on the proposed plan of distribution

(“Plan”) through February 13, 2023, and the Commission received three public comments that 

raised various issues (the “Comments”).

Rule 1104 of the Commission’s Rules, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1104, provides in relevant part, 

“[t]he order approving or disapproving the plan should be entered within 30 days after the end of 

the final period allowed for comments on the proposed plan unless the Commission or the 

hearing officer, by written order, allows a longer period for good cause shown.”

The Division states additional time is needed to present its recommendation to the 

Commission regarding the Comments and the Plan, and therefore, good cause has been shown to 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 96665 (Jan. 13, 2023).
2

enter an order extending time to approve or disapprove the Plan until July 13, 2023.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1104 of the Commission’s Rules,2

for good cause shown, the time for entering an order approving or disapproving the Plan is 

extended to July 13, 2023.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary

 

2

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1104.
Case 18-50062-SCS Doc Filed 12/04/20 Entered 12/04/20 09:11:51 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 5
Case 18-50062-SCS Doc Filed 12/04/20 Entered 12/04/20 09:11:51 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 5
Case 18-50062-SCS Doc Filed 12/04/20 Entered 12/04/20 09:11:51 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 5
Case 18-50062-SCS Doc Filed 12/04/20 Entered 12/04/20 09:11:51 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 5
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

NEWPORT NEWS DIVISION 

In Re: Case No. 18-50062-SCS

Aundrea Lynn Holiday Chapter 13

Debtor Judge Stephen C. St. John

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that on December 4, 2020, a copy of the foregoing Notice of Mortgage Payment Change 

was filed electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent to the following party/parties through 

the Court’s ECF System. Party/Parties may access this filing through the Court’s system: 

Charles G. Havener, Debtor’s Counsel 

charleshavener@msn.com 

Michael P. Cotter, Chapter 13 Trustee 

mpcotter@mpcch13.com 

John P. Fitzgerald, III, Office of the United States Trustee 

Ustpregion04.no.ecf@usdoj.gov 

I further certify that on December 4, 2020, a copy of the foregoing Notice of Mortgage Payment 

Change was mailed by first-class U.S. Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed to the 

following: 

Aundrea Lynn Holiday, Debtor 

321 Woodhaven Road 

Newport News, VA 23608 

Dated: December 4, 2020 /s/ D. Anthony Sottile

 D. Anthony Sottile 

Authorized Agent for Creditor 

Sottile & Barile, LLC 

394 Wards Corner Road, Suite 180 

Loveland, OH 45140 

Phone: 513.444.4100 

Email: bankruptcy@sottileandbarile.com

Case 18-50062-SCS Doc Filed 12/04/20 Entered 12/04/20 09:11:51 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 5
### §78. Detail of troops to Sequoia, Yosemite, and General Grant Parks

The Secretary of the Army, upon the request of the Secretary of the Interior, is authorized and directed to make the necessary detail of troops to prevent trespassers or intruders from entering the Sequoia National Park, the Yosemite National Park, and the General Grant National Park, respectively, in California, for the purpose of destroying the game or objects of curiosity therein, or for any other purpose prohibited by law or regulation for the government of said reservations, and to remove such persons from said parks if found therein.

(June 6, 1900, ch. 791, §1, 31 Stat. 618; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued military Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.

#### General Grant National Park Abolished

Act Mar. 4, 1940, ch. 40, §2, 54 Stat. 43, set out as section 80a of this title, abolished the General Grant National Park and added the lands to the Kings Canyon National Park as the General Grant grove section.
Jefferson 

County 

Lewis & Clark U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

County Bureau of Land Management 

Malta
 

Field Office
 

Missoula 

Field Office 

Field Office

Lewistown 


 

Butte Field Office 

Miles City Helena
 

Field

Butte Field Office
 Draft RMP/EIS

Office
 Billings 

Field Office 

Dillon
 Map 43: Oil & Gas Leasing 

Field Office
 Restrictions Under Alternative B 

Broadwater 

Miles County 0 400 

Townsend 

Anaconda 

Deer Lodge 

Butte County 

Silver Bow
 

County
 

Gallatin 

County 

Livingston Bozeman 

City
 Interstate
 US Route
 MT Route
 

Park Standard Lease Terms County 

Controlled Surface Use;Timing Limitation
 No Surface Occupancy
 No Lease County Boundary Field Office Boundary 

Miles 

Map shows oil and gas leasing stipulations on federal mineral 0 40 

estate lands under Alternative B. Map Scale 1:510,000 

Map generated by the Butte Field Office in February 2007 

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection 

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data for individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.
#### Adeline Hoffman, Appellant, v. Bank of Coney Island and Others, Respondents, Impleaded with Charles B. Law, Sheriff of Kings County.

Order modified so as to confine the examination of plaintiff before trial to the issues raised by the affirmative defenses pleaded in the answer, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Mo opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred.
g:\blm\buttermp\ams\Finalfigures\Fig2-25_RecreationManagementAreas8511.mxd 

Butte 

Helena 

Bozeman 

Boulder 

Big Sky 

Townsend 

Gardiner 

Belgrade 

Anaconda 

Whitehall 

Livingston 

Three Forks 

East Helena 

West Yellowstone 

Deerlodge

County 

Silverbow

County 

Lewis and Clark 

County 

Broadwater 

County 

Gallatin

Coun ty 

Park

County 

Meagher

County Powell

County

Granite

Coun ty 

Beaverhead

County 

Madison

County 

Wheatland

County 

Sweet Grass

County 

Stillwater 

Coun ty 

Yellowstone National

Park 

Freemont

County 

Clark

County 

Jefferson

County 

§ ̈¦15 

§ ̈¦15 

§ ̈¦90 

§ ̈¦90 

£¤12 

£¤12 

WYOMING

IDAHO 

MONTANA 

IDAHO 

Cascade

County 

Lewis and Clark 

RMA 

Holter Lake/

Sleeping Giant RMA 

Humbug Spires 

RMA 

Upper Bighole

RMA 

Scratchgravel Hills

RMA 

I Continental Divide National Special Recreation Management Scenic Trail Areas (RMA) Lewis and Clark 

Extensive Recreation National Historic Trail Special Recreation 

0 Management Area Management Areas Miles 25 

Butte Field Office - EIS No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management (BLM) for use of RMP Planning Area, Montana 

data for purposes not intended by BLM. FIGURE 2-25
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 554

 531

 498

 507

 440

 464

 515

 452

 487

 496

 502

 512

 563

 562

 592

 559

 518

 556

 540

 511

 515

 519

 558

 558

 558

 557

 584

 515

 541

 570

 608

 329

 338

 340

 352

 350

 357

 374

 392

 403

 395

 399

 399

 402

 401

 416

 418

 410

 415

 423

 439

 447

 452

 453

 439

 438

 452

 454

 456

 490

 506

 567

 389

 386

 381

 385

 390

 402

 420

 421

 437

 429

 431

 432

 449

 448

 467

 470

 468

 484

 484

 479

 485

 487

 496

 498

 491

 497

 517

 483

 514

 531

 583

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 11, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 256

 255

 251

 254

 257

 264

 276

 276

 286

 281

 282

 283

 293

 293

 305

 306

 305

 315

 315

 312

 316

 317

 323

 324

 319

 323

 336

 314

 334

 344

 376

TOTAL 14,234

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
Silverbow

g:\blm\buttermp\ams\FinalFigures\Fig2-17_West_Yell_CTT_Habitat_8511 

Jefferson County

§ ̈¦15 

BOULDER BASIN

10020006
 

! Boulder 

Butte 

P
 

County
 

! 

!

Whitehall 

Map

Location
 

I Bureau Of Land Management

Planning Area Boundary 

Butte Field Office

(BLM) Lands 

HUC Boundary Bureau Of Reclamation

Rivers and Streams (BOR) Lands Sensitive Salmonid Species Habitat Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout Habitat Private Lands 

Westslope Cutthroat Trout Habitat Boulder Basin

State of Montana Lands Butte Field Office - EIS 0 Miles 6 Bull Trout Habitat 

No warranty is made by the Bureau of USDA Forest Service Lands RMP Planning Area, Montana Land Management (BLM) for use of USDI Fish and Wildlife FIGURE 2-21c data for purposes not intended by BLM. Service Lands
### §1026. Compromise, adjustment, or cancellation of farm indebtedness

Whoever knowingly makes any false statement for the purpose of influencing in any way the action of the Secretary of Agriculture, or of any person acting under his authority, in connection with any compromise, adjustment, or cancellation of any farm indebtedness as provided by sections 1150, 1150a, and 1150b of Title 12, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 755; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on section 1150c(a) of title 12, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Banks and Banking (Dec. 20, 1944, ch. 623, §4(a), 58 Stat. 837).

Words "of Agriculture" were inserted after "Secretary" for reasons of identification.

Words "upon conviction thereof" were omitted as surplusage, since punishment can not be imposed until after conviction.

Other changes were made in phraseology without change of substance.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000".
§ 235.5 Preinspection. ( a ) *In United States territories and possessions.* In the case of any aircraft proceeding from Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (beginning November 28, 2009), Puerto Rico, or the United States Virgin Islands destined directly and without touching at a foreign port or place, to any other of such places, or to one of the States of the United States or the District of Columbia, the examination of the passengers and crew required by the Act may be made prior to the departure of the aircraft, and in such event, final determination of admissibility will be made immediately prior to such departure. The examination will be conducted in accordance with sections 232, 235, and 240 of the Act and 8 CFR parts 235 and 240. If it appears to the immigration officer that any person in the United States being examined under this section is prima facie removable from the United States, further action with respect to his or her examination will be deferred and further proceedings regarding removability conducted as provided in section 240 of the Act and 8 CFR part 240. When the foregoing inspection procedure is applied to any aircraft, persons examined and found admissible will be placed aboard the aircraft, or kept at the airport separate and apart from the general public until they are permitted to board the aircraft. No other person will be permitted to depart on such aircraft until and unless he or she is found to be admissible as provided in this section.
( b ) *In foreign territory.* In the case of any aircraft, vessel, or train proceeding directly, without stopping, from a port or place in foreign territory to a port-of-entry in the United States, the examination and inspection of passengers and crew required by the Act and final determination of admissibility may be made immediately prior to such departure at the port or place in the foreign territory and shall have the same effect under the Act as though made at the destined port-of-entry in the United States.
[62 FR 10358, Mar. 6, 1997, as amended at 74 FR 2836, Jan. 16, 2009; 74 FR 25388, May 28, 2009]
### **CHAPTER 109A—SEXUAL ABUSE**

Sec.
2241.
Aggravated sexual abuse.
2242.
Sexual abuse.
2243.
Sexual abuse of a minor, a ward, or an individual in Federal custody.
2244.
Abusive sexual contact.
2245.
Sexual abuse resulting in death. 1

2246.
Definitions for chapter.
2247.
Repeat offenders.
2248.
Mandatory restitution.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 99–646 and Pub. L. 99–654 added identical chapters 109A.

#### Amendments

**2022**—Pub. L. 117–103, div. W, title XII, §1202(c)(2), Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 925, substituted "Sexual abuse of a minor, a ward, or an individual in Federal custody" for "Sexual abuse of a minor or ward" in item 2243.

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §§40111(c), 40113(a)(2), title VI, §60010(b), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1903, 1907, 1973, redesignated item 2245 as 2246 and added items 2245, 2247, and 2248.

1  Section catchline amended by Pub. L. 109–248 without corresponding amendment of chapter analysis.
<PAGE>   1
                               HICKOK INCORPORATED



          EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          Year Ended September 30
                                                           ----------------------------------------------------
                                                              1998                 1997                1996
                                                           -----------          -----------         -----------

<S>                                                         <C>                  <C>                 <C>      
  PRIMARY
  -------
  Average shares outstanding                                1,196,602            1,193,497           1,192,850

  Net effect of dilutive stock
     options- based on the 
     treasury stock method using
     average market price                                      18,073               17,992              24,305
                                                           ----------           ----------          ----------

             Total Shares                                   1,214,675            1,211,489           1,217,155
                                                           ==========           ==========          ==========

  Net Income                                               $1,034,400           $  605,317          $  959,875
                                                           ==========           ==========          ==========
Net Income per Share                                       $      .85           $      .50          $      .79
                                                           ==========           ==========          ==========


  FULLY DILUTED
  -------------
  Average shares outstanding                                1,196,602            1,193,497           1,192,850

  Net effect of dilutive stock
     options- based on the
     treasury stock method using
     year-end market price if
     higher than average market
     price                                                     18,073*              17,992*             24,305*
                                                           -----------          ----------          ----------

             Total Shares                                   1,214,675            1,211,489           1,217,155
                                                           ==========           ==========          ==========

  Net Income                                               $1,034,400           $  605,317          $  959,875
                                                           ==========           ==========          ==========
Net Income Per Share                                       $      .85           $.     .50          $      .79
                                                           ==========           ==========          ==========
</TABLE>


* Year-end market price is less than average market price, use same as primary
shares.
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3541 — TPG POST/ESSENT RETAIL/CENDRIS-BSC JV)

(2004/C 236/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 15 September 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
(April 22, 1943.)

#### Maurice P. Geller, Respondent and Appellant, *v.*Martin Tow et al., Appellants and Respondents.

*723
      *Per Curiam.*

It is unfortunate that there was a misunderstanding as to the amount of the fees which were to be allowed to the referee. Under the circumstances, an award of $750 to cover the services rendered would have been proper. We realize that the referee must have spent a considerable amount of time in the preparation of his report. The questions under consideration were exceedingly difficult. However, the amount in dispute between plaintiff and defendant was not large. Of course, after the original mistake was made, both parties should have immediately apprized the referee as to the arrangements which were actually made between them.

The judgment should be modified by deducting therefrom the sum of $800, and as so modified affirmed without costs. The order confirming the referee’s report, and the order denying defendants’ motion to review the taxation of costs should be modified accordingly, and as so modified affirmed without costs.

Present—Martin, P. J., Townley, Grlennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.

Judgment and orders unanimously modified in accordance with opinion, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.
(54 South. 939.)

No. 18,552.

#### In re PERRAULT'S ESTATE.

(March 27, 1911.)

*(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)*

Taxation (§ 421*)— Assessment — Description — Validity.

Certain land was assessed for taxes under a description, “Heirs of C. L. and J. L. Williams, 960 acres, swamp land in T. 6, B. 5 E., parish of St. Landry.” *Held*that, it being shown that the tax debtors owned no other land in such township, the description sufficiently identified the land.

LEd. Note. — Eor other cases, see Taxation, Cent. Dig. §§ 720-735; Dec. Dig. § 421.*]

Appeal from Sixteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Landry; B. H. Pavy, Judge.

Buie by the executrix of the succession of William C. Perrault on the St. Landry Bealty Company, Limited, to show cause why defendant should not accept title to a specified tract of land. Erom a decree in favor of the executrix, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Borah & I-Iimel, for appellant. William J. Sandoz, for appellee.

PBOVOSTY, J.

The present suit is a rule taken by the executrix of the succession of Perrault on the defendant in rule, the St. Landry Bealty Company, Limited, to show cause why this company should not accept title to a tract of land of 1,186 acres, adjudicated to it at the sale of the property of said succession. One of the links in the chain of the title to 960 acres of the land is a tax sale, and defendant’s refusal to accept the title is because of its fear that the tax sale was invalid by reason of the insufficiency of the description of the land in the assessment upon which the sale was based.

The description was as follows:

> “Heirs of C. L. and J. L. Williams, 960 acres, swamp land, in T. 6, B. 5 B., parish of St. Landry.”

This description, mentioning, as it does, only the township, would not have identified the land, and the tax sale would therefore have been null, if the tax debtors had had any other land in that township; but this 960-acre tract was all they had, hence this description, imperfect as it was, identified their land, since it applied to it and to none other, and was therefore sufficient. Weber’s Heirs v. Martinez, 125 La. 663, 51 South. *455679, and cases there cited. The evidence shows that the purchaser at the tax sale had no difficulty in identifying the land, and that he and his successors in title have been in actual possession since the tax sale.

Judgment affirmed.
### §5935. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 105–391, title II, §205, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3500, related to availability of National Park System units for scientific study. See section 100705 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 618

 648

 653

 662

 670

 725

 758

 761

 726

 762

 777

 750

 697

 634

 714

 695

 662

 602

 568

 580

 591

 542

 560

 584

 601

 585

 587

 636

 705

 802

 799

 590

 603

 645

 651

 661

 673

 727

 722

 701

 710

 753

 691

 637

 575

 643

 652

 598

 572

 507

 477

 526

 519

 539

 529

 555

 543

 570

 586

 622

 707

 732

 607

 633

 651

 655

 667

 694

 741

 748

 718

 731

 768

 725

 665

 599

 685

 669

 626

 587

 532

 511

 554

 529

 549

 556

 579

 568

 578

 606

 655

 761

 771

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 22, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 391

 407

 418

 421

 428

 445

 474

 478

 460

 468

 491

 464

 427

 386

 439

 429

 403

 379

 345

 332

 358

 343

 355

 360

 374

 367

 373

 391

 421

 486

 492

TOTAL 19,918

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
§ 363.21 How does the Secretary reallot funds? ( a ) Whenever the Secretary determines that any amount of an allotment to a State under § 363.20 for any fiscal year will not be expended by such State for carrying out the provisions of this part, the Secretary will make such amount available for carrying out the provisions of this part to one or more of the States that the Secretary determines will be able to use additional amounts during such year for carrying out such provisions.
( b ) Any amount made available to a State for any fiscal year in accordance with paragraph (a) will be regarded as an increase in the State's allotment under this part for such year.
(Authority: Section 603(b) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 795h(b))