alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of McLaren Performance Technologies, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Annual
Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2002, as
amended by Amendment No. 1, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report") that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




February 26, 2003              /s/ Wiley R. McCoy
                               ------------------------------------
                               Wiley R. McCoy
                               Chief Executive Officer
Case 18-34024-KRH Doc 21 Filed 10/01/18 Entered 10/02/18 09:43:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 5
Case 18-34024-KRH Doc 21 Filed 10/01/18 Entered 10/02/18 09:43:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 5
Case 18-34024-KRH Doc 21 Filed 10/01/18 Entered 10/02/18 09:43:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 5
Case 18-34024-KRH Doc 21 Filed 10/01/18 Entered 10/02/18 09:43:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 5
Case 18-34024-KRH Doc 21 Filed 10/01/18 Entered 10/02/18 09:43:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 5
§ 608.3 What regulations apply? The following regulations apply to this part: ( a ) The Department of Education General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) as follows: ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) The following sections of 34 CFR part 75 (Direct Grant Programs): §§ 75.1-75.104, 75.125-75.129, 75.190-75.192, 75.230-75.261, 75.500, 75.510-75.519, 75.524-75.534, 75.580-75.903, and 75.910;
( 3 ) 34 CFR part 77 (Definitions that Apply to Department Regulations).
( 4 ) 34 CFR part 79 (Intergovernmental Review of Department of Education Programs and Activities).
( 5 ) 34 CFR part 82 (New Restrictions on Lobbying).
( 6 ) [Reserved]
( 7 ) 34 CFR part 86 (Drug-Free Schools and Campuses).
( b ) The regulations in this part 608.
( c ) (1) 2 CFR part 180 (OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement)), as adopted at 2 CFR part 3485; and ( 2 ) 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards), as adopted at 2 CFR part 3474.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1060-1063a, 1063c)
[58 FR 38713, July 20, 1993, as amended at 79 FR 76101, Dec. 19, 2014]
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11** 
**- 1506** 

GEORGIA ARNETTE GREEN ,
Plaintiff

– Appellant,

and

EAGLES LEARNING CENTER ,
Plaintiff ,

v.
LENOIR COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; SHERIFF W. E. (BILLY) SMITH; SG T. K. W. COOK; FIRST SGT. A. H. BATCHELOR, Individually and in Official Capacity; NORTH CAROLINA HIGHWAY PATROL; DEPUTY ERIC DIXON, Individually and in Off icial Capacity; TROOPER MICHAEL S. TURNER; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA OR THE COUNTY OF LENOIR ,
Defen dants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Greenville

. Malcolm J. Howard , Senior District Judge. ( 4:08

- cv
- 00072

- H )

Submitted : December 15, 2011 Decided: December 19, 2011

Befo re GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Georgia A. Green, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Christopher Hart, SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL, HICKS & HART, PA, New Bern, North Carolina; Hal F. Askins, NORTH CAROLIN A DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Georgia Arnette Green appeals the district court ’ s

order s denying relief on h er 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complai nt , and denying her motion for reconsideration . We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Green v. Lenoir
Cnty. Sheriff’s Dep’t , No. 4:08

- cv
- 00072

- H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 30,

2010 & Apr. 7, 2011)

. We deny Green’s motion for appointment of

counsel , and w e dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

proce ss.

AFFIRMED
#### § 647.2 Who is eligible for a grant?

Institutions of higher education and combinations of those institutions are eligible for grants to carry out McNair projects.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-11, 1070a-15, 1088, and 1141(a) and 1144a)
§ 662.7 What definitions apply to this program? ( a ) Definitions of the following terms as used in this part are contained in 2 CFR part 200, subpart A, or 34 CFR part 77: Applicant
Application
Award
EDGAR
Fiscal year
Grant
Secretary
( b ) The definition of *institution of higher education* as used in this part is contained in 34 CFR 600.4.
( c ) The following definitions of other terms used in this part apply to this program:
*Area studies* means a program of comprehensive study of the aspects of a society or societies, including the study of their geography, history, culture, economy, politics, international relations, and languages.
*Binational commission* means an educational and cultural commission established, through an agreement between the United States and either a foreign government or an international organization, to carry out functions in connection with the program covered by this part.
*Dependent* means any of the following individuals who accompany the recipient of a fellowship under this program to his or her training site for the entire fellowship period if the individual receives more than 50 percent of his or her support from the recipient during the fellowship period: ( 1 ) The recipient's spouse.
( 2 ) The recipient's or spouse's children who are unmarried and under age 21.
*J. William Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board* means the presidentially-appointed board that is responsible for supervision of the program covered by this part.
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6), 2456)
[63 FR 46361, Aug. 31, 1998, as amended at 79 FR 76104, Dec. 19, 2014]
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean TDS

1 659 637 650 418

2 726 663 702 450

3 731 691 720 461

4 689 593 629 405

5 679 605 647 416

6 696 680 684 439

7 744 698 724 463

8 744 739 741 474

9 739 723 734 470

10 1,182 700 822 524

11 1,297 1,147 1220 770

12 1,262 1,114 1190 751

13 1,243 1,147 1207 762

14 1,154 512 705 452

15 529 316 428 281

16 1,493 496 923 586

17 1,152 726 956 607

18 961 790 843 537

19 1,322 626 1095 693

20 707 263 403 265

21 657 568 625 402

22 611 395 566 366

23 565 327 418 274

24 355 144 303 203

25 550 136 314 210

26 546 148 353 234

27 669 457 559 361

28 555 115 253 172

29 134 88 107 82

30 173 96 132 98

31 108 85 100 78

Total 19753

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Check 21 

Period: January 2023 Run Date: 2/2/2023
§ 668.211 Erroneous data appeals. ( a ) *Eligibility.* Except as provided in § 668.208(b), you may appeal the calculation of a cohort default rate upon which a loss of eligibility, under § 668.206, or provisional certification, under § 668.16(m), is based if— ( 1 ) You dispute the accuracy of data that you previously challenged on the basis of incorrect data, under § 668.204(b); or
( 2 ) A comparison of the loan record detail reports that we provide to you for the draft and official cohort default rates shows that the data have been newly included, excluded, or otherwise changed, and you dispute the accuracy of that data.
( b ) *Deadlines for submitting an appeal.* ( 1 ) You must send a request for verification of data errors to the relevant data manager, or data managers, and to us within 15 days after you receive the notice of your loss of eligibility or provisional certification. Your request must include a description of the information in the cohort default rate data that you believe is incorrect and all supporting documentation that demonstrates the error.
( 2 ) Within 20 days after receiving your request for verification of data errors, the data manager must send you and us a response that— ( i ) Addresses each of your allegations of error; and
( ii ) Includes the documentation used to support the data manager's position.
( 3 ) Within 15 days after receiving a guaranty agency's notice that we hold an FFELP loan about which you are inquiring, you must send us your request for verification of that loan's data errors. Your request must include a description of the information in the cohort default rate data that you believe is incorrect and all supporting documentation that demonstrates the error. We respond to your request as set forth under paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
( 4 ) Within 15 days after receiving incomplete or illegible records or data, you must send a request for replacement records or clarification of data to the data manager and us.
( 5 ) Within 20 days after receiving your request for replacement records or clarification of data, the data manager must— ( i ) Replace the missing or illegible records;
( ii ) Provide clarifying information; or
( iii ) Notify you and us that no clarifying information or additional or improved records are available.
( 6 ) You must send your completed appeal to us, including all supporting documentation— ( i ) Within 30 days after you receive the final data manager's response to your request; or
( ii ) If you are also requesting a new data adjustment or filing a loan servicing appeal, by the latest of the filing dates required in paragraph (b)(6)(i) of this section or in § 668.210(b)(6)(i) or § 668.212(c)(10)(i).
( c ) *Determination.* If we determine that incorrect data were used to calculate your cohort default rate, we recalculate your cohort default rate based on the correct data and electronically correct the rate that is publicly released.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1845-0022) (Authority:20 U.S.C. 1082, 1085, 1094, 1099c)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 34-95397 / July 29, 2022

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension, pursuant to 

Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, of trading in the securities of Viabuilt 

Ventures, Inc., (“Viabuilt”) (CIK No. 0001575975), of Reno, Nevada at 9:30 a.m. EDT on 

August 1, 2022, and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on August 12, 2022.

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of Viabuilt because of indicia of 

market manipulation and unusual market activity, including recent buy orders that increased 

Viabuilt’s stock price by 570% since the security’s last trade approximately six weeks priory.

The Commission cautions broker-dealers, shareholders, and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by the company. 

Further, brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Rule 15c2-11 under the 

Exchange Act, at the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered unless 

and until they have strictly complied with all of the provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer 

has any questions as to whether or not it has complied with the rule, it should not enter any 

quotation but instead should immediately contact the staff in the Division of Trading and 

Markets, Office of Interpretation and Guidance, at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer is 

uncertain as to what is required by Rule 15c2-11, it should refrain from entering quotations 

relating to Viabuilt securities until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is 

certain that all of its provisions have been met. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation 

which is in violation of the rule, the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement 

action.

If any broker-dealer or other person has any information that may relate to this matter, they 

should immediately contact Robert Baker, Assistant Director, at (617) 573-8918.
Exhibit 99.1

CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN, INC



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of California Pizza
Kitchen, Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 29,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Frederick R. Hipp, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

| |                         |                      
| | ----------------------- | ---------------------
| | By:                     | /s/ FREDERICK R. HIPP
| | Frederick R. Hipp      
| | Chief Executive Officer

---
### §3522. Probationers and parolees

(a) A probation officer may, upon the request of the Attorney General, supervise any person provided protection under this chapter who is on probation or parole under State law, if the State involved consents to such supervision. Any person so supervised shall be under Federal jurisdiction during the period of supervision and shall, during that period be subject to all laws of the United States which pertain to probationers or parolees, as the case may be.

(b) The failure by any person provided protection under this chapter who is supervised under subsection (a) to comply with the memorandum of understanding entered into by that person pursuant to section 3521(d) of this title shall be grounds for the revocation of probation or parole, as the case may be.

(c) The United States Parole Commission and the Chairman of the Commission shall have the same powers and duties with respect to a probationer or parolee transferred from State supervision pursuant to this section as they have with respect to an offender convicted in a court of the United States and paroled under chapter 311 1 of this title. The provisions of sections 4201 through 4204, 4205(a), (e), and (h), 4206 through 4215, and 4218 1 of this title shall apply following a revocation of probation or parole under this section.

(d) If a person provided protection under this chapter who is on probation or parole and is supervised under subsection (a) of this section has been ordered by the State court which imposed sentence on the person to pay a sum of money to the victim of the offense involved for damage caused by the offense, that penalty or award of damages may be enforced as though it were a civil judgment rendered by a United States district court. Proceedings to collect the moneys ordered to be paid may be instituted by the Attorney General in any United States district court. Moneys recovered pursuant to such proceedings shall be distributed to the victim.

(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §1208, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2157; amended Pub. L. 99–646, §75, Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3618; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7072(b), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4405.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Chapter 311 of this title, referred to in subsec. (c), which consisted of sections 4201 to 4218 of this title, was repealed effective Nov. 1, 1987, by Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §§218(a)(5), 235(a)(1), (b)(1), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2027, 2031, 2032, subject to remaining effective for five years after Nov. 1, 1987, in certain circumstances.

#### Amendments

1988—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 100–690 substituted "4215" for "4216".

1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–646 substituted "probationers or parolees, as the case may be" for "parolees".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1984, see section 1210 of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as a note under section 3521 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
# Official Journal C 67/26 F

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 67 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6426 February 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 67

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6426 February 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 67/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 August 2020 to 31 December 2020(Published pursuant to Article 13 or 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |
| 2021/C 67/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 January 2021 to 31 January 2021(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 5 |
| 2021/C 67/03 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 January 2021 to 31 January 2021(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC) | 15 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 67/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 August 2020 to 31 December 2020(Published pursuant to Article 13 or 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

2021/C 67/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 January 2021 to 31 January 2021(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

5

2021/C 67/03

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 January 2021 to 31 January 2021(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

15

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Building and Loan Association of Dakota v. William H. Walker et al.

Filed December 19, 1899.

No. 9,059.

1. Contracts: Construction. It is not the province of courts to make contracts, but to construe and enforce those made by the parties.

2. Usury: Parties: Mortgages. The defense of usury is personal to the borrower and his sureties and privies, and is not available to a purchaser of the equity of redemption of the mortgaged premises.

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Holmes, J.

*Reversed.*

*William Leese*and *Owsley Wilson,*for plaintiff in error.

A. *R. Talbot, contra.*

*457Norval, J.

This suit was instituted to foreclose a real estate mortgage given by one Parker F. Fugate to the plaintiff to. secure his promissory note for the sum of $3,200 given December 2,1889, due in three years thereafter and drawing interest at the rate of six per cent on $1,600. William H. Walker and Mary E. Walker purchased the mortgaged'premises, and assumed and agreed to pay the indebtedness secured by the mortgage. Fugate was not made a party to the suit, but the Walkers were, who pleaded that the mortgage was given to secure a loan of $1,600, and no more, which it is alleged was the sole amount of money received from plaintiff by Fugate, and that the transaction was usurious. Certain payments were also pleaded. The court found that plaintiff, a Dakota corporation, was entitled to recover the actual amount of money loaned, $1,600, with interest thereon at ten per cent from the date of the mortgage, deducting the actual amounts paid plaintiff by way of principal, interest, premiums or otherwise, with interest thereon at the rate of ten per cent from the dates of such payment, and a decree was rendered in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $390.89. To reverse the same it has prosecuted this proceeding in error.

The amount of the face of the note and mortgage was $3,200, and the rate of interest which the note stipulated should be paid was six per cent, yet the court, by its decree, allowed plaintiff only $1,600, the sum borrowed, and ten per cent interest thereon, less payments made and interest on the same. The defense of usury was not sustained to its fullest extent, else the plaintiff would not have been awarded any interest or costs. The plaintiff was entitled to recover the face of its mortgage with the stipulated'rate of interest after deducting payments, or the plea of usury should have been sustained in its entirety. It is not the province of the court to make new contracts for parties. This is elementary.

*458The defense of usury was not available to the defendants, since they were not parties to the loan, but merely purchased the mortgaged premises and assumed and agreed to pay the debt, which fact did not permit them to assail the contract on the ground that it was tainted with the vice of usury. See *Cheney v. Dunlap, 27*Nebr., 401; *Morling v. Bronson,*37 Nebr., 608; *McKnight v. Phelps,*37 Nebr., 858. The decree is erroneous, and it is accordingly reversed, and the cause remanded, with leave to make the mortgagor a party defendant, and for further proceedings.

Reversed.