alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(No. 7017

#### Interroyal Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Corrections, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 1, 1973.*

Interroyal Corporation, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5123 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5123

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 476 East Main Street in Galesburg, Illinois, as the ``Senior Airman 
                 Daniel Miller Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENIOR AIRMAN DANIEL MILLER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 476 East Main Street in Galesburg, Illinois, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Senior Airman Daniel Miller Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Senior 
Airman Daniel Miller Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 10, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5123

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 476 East Main Street in Galesburg, Illinois, as the ``Senior Airman 
                 Daniel Miller Post Office Building''.
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 964

 958

 970

 914

 919

 970

 958

 971

 944

 942

 988

 980

 978

 1,011

 1,049

 1,057

 1,116

 1,072

 1,006

 1,001

 952

 956

 1,043

 1,073

 994

 936

 896

 850

 846

 836

 859

 856

 741

 748

 730

 745

 763

 814

 800

 789

 769

 764

 855

 902

 957

 803

 799

 761

 735

 718

 716

 716

 723

 702

 690

 679

 916

 884

 914

 882

 830

 874

 811

 848

 859

 882

 913

 895

 867

 884

 955

 989

 1,039

 920

 930

 891

 839

 820

 864

 852

 841

 789

 774

 749

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 6, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 582

 562

 581

 561

 529

 556

 517

 540

 547

 561

 580

 569

 552

 562

 606

 627

 658

 585

 591

 567

 535

 523

 550

 543

 536

 504

 494

 479

TOTAL 24,511

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
#### § 303.408 List of types and locations of information.

Each participating agency must provide parents, on request, a list of the types and locations of early intervention records collected, maintained, or used by the agency.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1417(c), 1439(a)(2), 1439(a)(4), 1442)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 524

 530

 521

 536

 540

 535

 554

 535

 514

 524

 535

 523

 549

 552

 557

 551

 537

 557

 568

 566

 577

 586

 588

 588

 574

 562

 558

 548

 564

 563

 560

 433

 425

 428

 429

 428

 437

 489

 477

 465

 471

 459

 464

 482

 513

 505

 497

 485

 507

 525

 534

 549

 553

 563

 553

 537

 552

 499

 449

 444

 457

 464

 469

 470

 476

 484

 483

 493

 520

 507

 493

 501

 502

 499

 519

 535

 536

 532

 516

 534

 551

 554

 558

 571

 574

 572

 560

 557

 529

 506

 510

 520

 511

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 13, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 306

 306

 310

 315

 314

 321

 337

 329

 321

 326

 326

 324

 337

 347

 347

 345

 335

 346

 357

 358

 361

 369

 371

 369

 362

 360

 343

 329

 331

 337

 332

TOTAL 16,142

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

In re: )

) Bankruptcy Case

JEFFREY L. WATSON ) No. 17-11147-KHK

AMY L. WATSON, ) Chapter 7

) 

 ) 

Debtor(s). )

REPORT OF DEPOSIT OF SMALL DIVIDENDS

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3011 and 11 U.S.C. 347, the trustee 

herein submits a check payable to “United States Bankruptcy Court" representing small dividends to 

be deposited by the Clerk of Court into the Treasury of the United States. Said funds are subject to 

withdrawal as provided by 28 U.S.C. 2042 and shall not escheat under any state law. The small 

dividends represent the dividend(s) due and payable to:

Creditor's Name and Address Amount of Dividend

 

Internal Revenue Service $0.55

Centralized Insolvency Op.

PO Box 7346

Philadelphia, PA 19101

Claim No. 1a

________________________________________________________________

 Total $0.55

Dated: November 2, 2018 /s/ H. Jason Gold 

 H. Jason Gold, VA Bar No. 19117

NELSON MULLINS RILEY & 

SCARBOROUGH, LLP

101 Constitution Ave. NW

Suite 900

Washington, DC 20001

 (202) 689-2800

Case 17-11147-KHK Doc 108 Filed 11/02/18 Entered 11/02/18 15:15:49 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
#### § 303.411 Opportunity for a hearing.

The participating agency must, on request, provide parents with the opportunity for a hearing to challenge information in their child's early intervention records to ensure that it is not inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise in violation of the privacy or other rights of the child or parents. A parent may request a due process hearing under the procedures in § 303.430(d)(1) provided that such hearing procedures meet the requirements of the hearing procedures in § 303.413 or may request a hearing directly under the State's procedures in § 303.413 (*i.e.,* procedures that are consistent with the FERPA hearing requirements in 34 CFR 99.22).

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1417(c), 1439(a)(2), 1439(a)(4), 1442)
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                                  Certification
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
        (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
                              United States Code)


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Excelsior Venture Partners III, LLC (the "Company"),
does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2002 (the "Form
10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  September 13, 2002                   /s/ David I. Fann
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            Name: David I. Fann
                                            Title: Co-Chief Executive Officer

Date:  September 13, 2002                   /s/ Douglas A. Lindgren
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            Name: Douglas A. Lindgren
                                            Title: Co-Chief Executive Officer

Date:  September 13, 2002                   /s/ Brian F. Schmidt
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            Name: Brian F. Schmidt
                                            Title: Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separate
disclosure document.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Gradie Ray, Appellant.

All concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 16, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3325-3326]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00813]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

32 CFR Part 18

Appointing Authority for Military Commissions

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This final rule removes 32 CFR part 18 concerning the 
Appointing Authority for Military Commissions. This rule pertains to a 
military function of the United States and is exempt from rulemaking 
requirements. Previously, this rule was published for informational 
purposes only. As a result of the enactment of Military Commissions Act 
of 2009, the Deputy Secretary's issuance of the Regulation for Trial by 
Military Commissions on November 6, 2011, and his cancellation of DoD 
Directive 5105.70, ``Appointing Authority for Military Commissions,'' 
this regulation is no longer required.

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective January 16, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Toppings, 571-372-0485.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information on Military 
Commissions, see Military Commissions Act of 2009.

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 18

    Military law.

PART 18--[REMOVED]

0
Accordingly, by the authority of 5 U.S.C. 301, 32 CFR part 18 is 
removed.

[[Page 3326]]

    Dated: January 10, 2013.
Morgan F. Park,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2013-00813 Filed 1-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 503 

To prohibit pay raises for the Vice President and any senior political appointee at a Federal agency subject to a lapse in appropriations, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 11, 2019 

Mr. SCHNEIDER (for himself, Mr. CASTEN of Illinois, and Mr. BLUMENAUER) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To prohibit pay raises for the Vice President and any senior 

political appointee at a Federal agency subject to a lapse 

in appropriations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Political Pay 

5 Raises During Shutdowns Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON PAY RAISE DURING GOVERNMENT 

7 SHUTDOWN. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi9 sion of law, during any period of a lapse in discretionary 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 503 IH

1 appropriations beginning on or after December 22, 2018, 

2 the Vice President and any senior political appointee at 

3 an agency with respect to which appropriations have 

4 lapsed may not receive a pay rate increase. 

5 (b) ADMINISTRATION.—In carrying out any pay 

6 freeze under subsection (a)— 

7 (1) the term ‘‘senior political appointee’’ means 

8 an individual occupying any position described under 

9 subsections (b) through (e) of section 738 of the Fi10 nancial Services and General Government Appro11 priations Act, 2018 (division E of Public Law 115– 

12 141); and 

13 (2) the requirements of subsections (f) through 

14 (k) of such section 738 shall apply. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 14.2**

----

**Consent of Independent Public      Accounting FirmTo The Board and Members of Imperial Chemical Industries PLC**

We hereby consent to the incorporation    by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-14220 and 333-07530)    on Form F-3 and the registration statements (Nos. 333-12998, 333-13000, 333-13002,    333-13642 and 333-13644) on Form S-8 of Imperial Chemical Industries PLC    of our report dated 17 February 2005 with respect to the consolidated    balance sheets of Imperial Chemical Industries PLC and subsidiaries as of    31 December 2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated profit and loss    accounts, consolidated statement of total recognized gains and losses, consolidated    statement of cash flow and consolidated reconciliations of movements in shareholders’ funds    for each of the years in the three year period ended 31 December 2004 which    reports    appears in the 2004 Annual Report on Form 20-F of Imperial Chemical Industries    PLC.

/s/KPMG Audit Plc

**KPMG Audit Plc**Chartered AccountantsRegistered AuditorLondon31 March 2005

----
Case 17-33303-KRH Doc 62 Filed 11/10/21 Entered 11/10/21 20:20:25 Desc MainDocument Page 1 of 6Case 17-33303-KRH Doc 62 Filed 11/10/21 Entered 11/10/21 20:20:25 Desc MainDocument Page 2 of 6Case 17-33303-KRH Doc 62 Filed 11/10/21 Entered 11/10/21 20:20:25 Desc MainDocument Page 3 of 6Case 17-33303-KRH Doc 62 Filed 11/10/21 Entered 11/10/21 20:20:25 Desc MainDocument Page 4 of 6Case 17-33303-KRH Doc 62 Filed 11/10/21 Entered 11/10/21 20:20:25 Desc MainDocument Page 5 of 6Case 17-33303-KRH Doc 62 Filed 11/10/21 Entered 11/10/21 20:20:25 Desc MainDocument Page 6 of 6
§ 395.2 Application for designation as a State licensing agency; general. ( a ) An application for designation as a State licensing agency may be submitted only by the State vocational rehabilitation agency providing vocational rehabilitation services to the blind under an approved State plan for vocational rehabilitation services under part 1361 of this chapter.
( b ) Such application shall be: ( 1 ) Submitted in writing to the Secretary;
( 2 ) Approved by the chief executive of the State; and
( 3 ) Transmitted over the signature of the administrator of the State agency making application.
905 A.2d 384

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner, v. Dorsey EVANS, Jr., Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG No. 14,

Sept. Term, 2006.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Aug. 10, 2006.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the Joint Response to Show Cause Order and Petition to suspend Respondent by consent, it is this 10th day of August 2006,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Dorsey Evans, Jr. be, and he is hereby, suspended from the practice of law for a period of ninety (90) days, his reinstatement conditioned upon his completion of six (6) hours of continuing legal education courses in the areas of probate law and legal ethics and said courses to be approved by Bar Counsel whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name Dorsey Evans, Jr. from the register of attorneys and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-713, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.
# Official Journal C 98I/2023

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 098I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6616 March 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 098I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6616 March 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 98 I/01 | Communication from the Commission – Public Procurement: A data space to improve public spending, boost data-driven policy-making and improve access to tenders for SMEs | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2023/C 98 I/01

Communication from the Commission – Public Procurement: A data space to improve public spending, boost data-driven policy-making and improve access to tenders for SMEs

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>



                                                                Exhibit 10(h)(2)

                Description of Amendment to Employment Agreement


        In connection with similar amendments in October 1999 to the Company's
Change in Control Agreements with other executive officers and officers, the
Company and Donald L. Thompson agreed to amend Mr. Thompson's April 8, 1996
Employment Agreement to: (i) change the date in Section 4.5(a)(i) from December
31, 1999 to December 31, 2004; (ii) change the date in Section 4.5(b)(ii) from
June 1, 1996 to October 1, 1999; and (iii) change the date in Section
4.5(d)(v)(2) from June 1, 1996 to October 1, 1999.
#### § 300.42 Supplementary aids and services.

*Supplementary aids and services* means aids, services, and other supports that are provided in regular education classes, other education-related settings, and in extracurricular and nonacademic settings, to enable children with disabilities to be educated with nondisabled children to the maximum extent appropriate in accordance with §§ 300.114 through 300.116.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1401(33))
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7069

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus RANDY EUGENE WOODWARD, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-95-30, CR-97-51, CA-99-722-7) Submitted: January 16, 2001 Decided: May 4, 2001 Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randy Eugene Woodward, Appellant Pro Se. Ruth Elizabeth Plagenhoef, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* We also decline to address Woodward’s claim that his sentence is invalid in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). We recently held in United States v. Sanders , No. 00-6281, 2001 WL 369719, at *10 (4th Cir. April 13, 2001), that the new rule announced in Apprendi is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review. 2 PER CURIAM: Randy Eugene Woodward seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Woodward , Nos. CR-95-30; CR97-51; CA-99-722-7 (W.D. Va. July 6, 2000). For the first time on appeal, Woodward raises new claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. We generally do not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal, except under narrow circumstances not present here. See Muth v. United States , 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993) (holding that issues raised for first timeon appeal generally will not be considered absent exceptional circumstances of plain error or fundamental miscarriage of justice). We therefore decline to address these claims. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Arthur B. KOONTZ and Mazie W. Koontz, his wife, Appellees.

No. 6982.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued May 27, 1955.

Decided May 27, 1955.

George F. Lynch, Special Asst, to the Atty. Gen. (H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Special Asst, to the Atty. Gen., Duncan W. Daugherty, U. S. Atty., Huntington, W. Va., and William T. Lively, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Charleston, W. Va., on brief), for appellant.

Harry B. Lambert, Donald O. Blagg, A. G. Stone, Rummel, Blagg & Stone, and Koontz & Koontz, Charleston, W. Va., on brief, for appellees.

Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The question presented by this appeal is the same as that decided by this court in Hofferbert v. Marshall, 4 Cir., 200 F.2d 648, viz.: Do the provisions of the Revenue Act of 1948, 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 12(d), 51(b), 107(a), permitting the splitting of income in a return by husband and wife apply to an item of long term income earned by the husband over a period of years? We are satisfied that the answer given to that question in Hofferbert v. Marshall is the correct one. See also the decisions of the Court of Appeals of the Third Circuit in C. I. R. v. Stockly, 221 F.2d 745, and of the Tax Court in that case, 22 T.C. 28 and in Mahler v. Com’r, 22 T.C. 1180. The fact that Congress has changed the law in the meantime is no reason why we should change our decision interpreting the law as it was prior to the change.

Affirmed.
Posted: 11/27/2023

Gates are currently closed as of

Monday, November 27, 2023 at approximately

10:00 hrs.

Comment: Rio Vista requirement / Seasonal closure.

************************************************

Please check regularly for updates at

http://www.usbr.gov/mp/cvo/vungvari/dcc_chng.pdf

Note 1: Gates may be operated/closed on short

notice for fishery protection in the November

to January timeframe.

Note 2: Gate operations may take approx 30

minutes to complete, so boats may not be permitted

to pass through the gates until approx 30 minutes

after the scheduled opening time. Boat passage may

be cut off approximately 30 minutes prior to the

scheduled closing time.

Questions may be directed to the Central Valley

Operations Office at gmora@usbr.gov.
§ 648.65 How does the institution of higher education disburse and return funds? ( a ) An institution that receives a grant shall disburse a stipend to a fellow in accordance with its regular payment schedule, but shall not make less than one payment per academic term.
( b ) If a fellow withdraws from an institution before completion of an academic term, the institution may award the fellowship to another individual who satisfies the requirements in § 648.40.
( c ) If a fellowship is vacated or discontinued for any period of time, the institution shall return a prorated portion of the institutional payment and unexpended stipend funds to the Secretary, unless the Secretary authorizes the use of those funds for a subsequent project period. The institution shall return the prorated portion of the institutional payment and unexpended stipend funds at a time and in a manner determined by the Secretary.
( d ) If a fellow withdraws from an institution before the completion of the academic term for which he or she received a stipend installment, the fellow shall return a prorated portion of the stipend installment to the institution at a time and in a manner determined by the Secretary.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1135c, 1135d)
§ 662.42 How may a fellowship be revoked? ( a ) The fellowship may be revoked only by the J. William Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board upon the recommendation of the Secretary.
( b ) The Secretary may recommend a revocation of a fellowship on the basis of— ( 1 ) The fellow's failure to meet any of the conditions in § 662.41; or
( 2 ) Any violation of the standards of conduct adopted by the J. William Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board.
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6), 2456, and Policy Statements of the J. William Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board, 1990)