alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dan Moses, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of STEC, Inc. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ DAN MOSES                                       
|Dan Moses                                           
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

August 11, 2008
§ 300.536 Change of placement because of disciplinary removals. ( a ) For purposes of removals of a child with a disability from the child's current educational placement under §§ 300.530 through 300.535, a change of placement occurs if— ( 1 ) The removal is for more than 10 consecutive school days; or
( 2 ) The child has been subjected to a series of removals that constitute a pattern— ( i ) Because the series of removals total more than 10 school days in a school year;
( ii ) Because the child's behavior is substantially similar to the child's behavior in previous incidents that resulted in the series of removals; and
( iii ) Because of such additional factors as the length of each removal, the total amount of time the child has been removed, and the proximity of the removals to one another.
( b ) ( 1 ) The public agency determines on a case-by-case basis whether a pattern of removals constitutes a change of placement.
( 2 ) This determination is subject to review through due process and judicial proceedings.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1415(k))
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00079-CV

IN RE SANDY RAY DICKERSON RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of 

the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED: April 2, 2013

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12** 
**- 7658** 

DICKINSON NORMAN ADIONSER ,

P etitioner

- Appellant , v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION AGENCY , Respondents

- Appellee s
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Roger W. Titus , District Judge. ( 8 :12

- cv
- 0 2524

- RWT )

Submitted : November 20, 2012 Decided: November 27, 2012

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Dickinson Norman Adionser , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Dickinson Norman Adionser appeals the district court ’ s

order de nying relief on his civil complaint filed pursuant to
the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a (2006) and the
Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 (2006) . We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm. Adionser v . United States , No. 8:12

- cv
- 02524

- RWT (D.
Md. Aug. 30, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
FROM: THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, COUNTY OF LEWIS AND CLARK,

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. ORVILLE JOHN WRIGHT, Defendant.

NO. DC-90-52A DECISION

DATED this 6th day of December, 1990.

On August 16,1990, the Defendant was sentenced to ten (10) years for Deceptive Practices; with credit given for 127 days time served; Dangerous Designation.

On December 6, 1990, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The Defendant was present and was represented by Cath Steger, of the Montana Defender Project. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence imposed shall remain the same.

The reason for the decision is pursuant to Rule 17 of the Sentence Review Division.
<PAGE>

                            AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO (2)

                                       TO

                   Employment Contract Dated September 1, 1995
                                     Between
                      Global TeleMedia International, Inc.
                                       and
                               Geoffrey F. McClain


This Amendment Number Two (2) dated February 1, 1997 to that certain Employment
Agreement dated September 1, 1995 by and between Global TeleMedia International,
Inc. and Geoffrey McClain shall be amended as follows

     Article 2. shall be amended to revise Article 2.1 as follows:

     2.   COMPENSATION.

               2.1  For all services rendered hereunder, Employer agrees to pay
          Employee and Employee agrees to accept from Employer, annual base
          compensation computed at the rate of Ninety Eight Thousand Dollars and
          No Cents ($98,000.00) per annum during the term of Employee's
          employment, prorated base don the period of actual service and payable
          in accordance with Employer's standard payroll policies.  The Board of
          Directors of Employer may increase Employee's compensation from time
          to time and will review Employee's performance hereunder and his
          compensation therefor in accordance with principles and practices
          generally acceptable to Employer's employees.

All other terms and conditions of the original agreement dated September 1, 1995
shall remain in full force and effect.


GLOBAL TELEMEDIA INTERNATIONAL,              GEOFFREY F. MCCLAIN
INC.



By:  /s/ Roderick A. McClain                 By:  /s/ Geoffrey F. McClain
   ---------------------------------------       ------------------------------
Its: President and Chief Executive Officer
Case 19-34574-KRH Doc 1270 Filed 03/28/22 Entered 03/28/22 21:22:11 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
Dubois

Lander

Legend

Roads

Crucial Winter Range

WYO recommended no surface development

Oil & Gas

Private

Suitable for surface development

Not suitable for surface development

Legally withdrawn from development

0 5 10 15 Miles

±

Crucial Winter Range,

Availabliity for

Oil & Gas Development,

and Wyoming Recommendations
EXHIBIT 32.01

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Ocean  Power
Corporation  (the  "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),
Michael Hopper, as Authorized Signatory of the Company,  certifies,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ MICHAEL HOPPER
---------------------------
Name:   Michael Hopper
Title:  Authorized Signatory
Date:   January 31, 2008

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
- Newsroom        - Press Releases
      - Public Statements
      - Speeches
      - Testimony
      - Spotlight Topics
      - Media Gallery
      - Upcoming Events
      - Webcasts
      - What's New
      - SEC Videos
      - Reports and Publications
      - RSS Feeds
      - Social Media 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

**TIME AND DATE:**  Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, December 18, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.

**PLACE:** The meeting will be held in Auditorium LL-002 at the Commission’s headquarters, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549.

**STATUS:** This meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public.  Seating will be on a first-come, first-served basis.  Visitors will be subject to security checks.  The meeting will be webcast on the Commission’s website at www.sec.gov.

**MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:** The subject matter of the Open Meeting will be:

- The Commission will consider whether to approve the 2020 budget of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the related annual accounting support fee for the Board under Section 109 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:** For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman, Office of the Secretary, at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: November 4, 2019

Vanessa A. CountrymanSecretary
(No. 74-CC-340

#### I.M.H. Associates, Ltd., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 13, 1974.*

I.M.H. Associates, Ltd., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Richmond

2104 W. Laburnum Ave. 

Suite 201 

Richmond, VA 23227 

Phone: (804) 358-9900 

Fax: (804) 358-8704 

Virginia Beach

272 Bendix Rd. 

Suite 330 

Virginia Beach, VA 23452 

Phone: (757) 313-3000 

Fax: (804) 358-8704 

Hampton

2 Eaton Street 

Suite 106 

Hampton, VA 23669 

Phone: (757) 825-5577 

Fax: (804) 358-8704

March 17, 2017 

VIA ECF 

William Redden, Clerk 

U.S. Bankruptcy Court 

701 E. Broad Street, Suite 4000 

Richmond, VA 23219-3515 

Re: Frank Virgil Perkins, Case No. 16-32929-KLP 

 Withdrawal of Debtor’s Objection to Claim 

Dear Mr. Redden: 

This firm represents the above-referenced Debtor in this Chapter 13 bankruptcy case. The 

Debtor, by Counsel, filed an Objection to Claim entered on the Docket as Entry #29. 

Please accept this letter as the Debtor’s formal Withdrawal regarding the aforementioned 

Objection to Claim. 

Please telephone if you have any questions. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ Mark C. Leffler 

Mark C. Leffler (VSB #40712) 

Counsel for Debtor 

CC: Carl M. Bates, Esquire, Ch. 13 Trustee (via ECF) 

Case 16-32929-KLP Doc 33 Filed 03/17/17 Entered 03/17/17 09:33:13 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
#### Lucinda Conley, Respondent, *v.*Village of Hudson Falls, Appellant.

Third Department,

May 6, 1914.

Municipal corporation •— liability of village for injuries sustained, by stumbling over a water gate projecting above the surface of the sidewalk — evidence.

Where, in an action against a village for personal injuries sustained by stumbling over a water gate projecting about two inches above a cement sidewalk and used for the private purposes of the abutting owners, it appears that the water gate had been in this position for a period of fifteen years, and although aside from the testimony of a son-in-law of the plaintiff that he had stumbled over the same without falling, there was no evidence that any one had ever encountered the obstruction or suggested that it was dangerous, a judgment for the plaintiff- should - be affirmed.

Appeal by the defendant, Village of Hudson Falls, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of -the clerk of the county of Washington on the 17th day of January, 1914, upon the verdict of a jury for $500, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office denying defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

*John Van*Valkenburgh, for the appellant.

*W. E. Young,*for the respondent.

*235Woodward, J.:

A very close question of law is involved in this appeal, and one which might be changed by comparatively trifling circumstances. The plaintiff, a woman sixty-one years of age, stumbled over a water gate in a cement sidewalk in the defendant village, receiving injuries for which the jury has awarded a verdict of $500. This water gate appears to have projected above the sidewalk about two inches. It was within one foot of the curb and about six feet from the other side of the walk. The evidence showed that this water gate had been in this same position, and with a like projection, for a period of fifteen years, and, aside from the testimony of a son-in-law of the plaintiff that he had stumbled over the same without falling, there was no evidence that any one had ever encountered this obstruction, or that any one had ever suggested that it was in any manner dangerous. It merely appears that this obstruction existed apparently for the private purposes of the abutting owners, and that the street was a much-used highway, and the municipal authorities may be held to be liable for permitting such an obstruction for private purposes where they would not be liable if the obstruction was shown to exist as a necessary part of some public utility. The case cannot, we think, be distinguished from that of *Preiss*v. *City of New York*(69 Misc. Rep. 492), and it is very much in line with that of *Archer*v. *City of Mount Vernon*(57 App. Div. 32), and we are inclined to the opinion that under all of the circumstances it was properly submitted to the jury, and that the verdict ought not to be disturbed.

The judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of IDACORP, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the"Report"), we, J. LaMont Keen, President and Chief Executive Officerof the Company, and Darrel T. Anderson, Senior Vice President - AdministrativeServices and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:

(1)              The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| */s/J. LaMont Keen*                   | * * | */s/Darrel T. Anderson*                         |
|---------------------------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------|
| J. LaMont Keen                        |          | Darrel T. Anderson                              |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |          | Senior Vice President - Administrative Services |
| March 1, 2007                         |          | and Chief Financial Officer                     |
|                                       |          | March 1, 2007                                   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             455
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,653
<ALLOWANCES>                                       145
<INVENTORY>                                      1,272
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,257
<PP&E>                                           2,789
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,020
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,116
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,385
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,001
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           571
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,122)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,116
<SALES>                                         13,742
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,785
<CGS>                                            9,881
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,881
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,313
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (317)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    274
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                274
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (330)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (56)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

11 a.m., Friday April 15, 2011.

# PLACE:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Surveillance and Enforcement Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield, 

Assistant Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2011-7705 Filed 3-29-11; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
----

Action brought on 18 June 2004 by Caviar Anzali against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case T-252/04)

(2004/C 217/62)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 18 June 2004 by Caviar Anzali, established in Colombes (France), represented by Jean-François Jésus, lawyer.

Novomarket S.A. was also a party to the proceedings before the Second Board of Appeal.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

----
Exhibit (10)(j)

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                              CAVALIER HOMES, INC.
                     1996 KEY EMPLOYEE STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

                  As directed by the Board of Directors of Cavalier Homes,  Inc.
(the "Company") at its meeting held on December 30,1997,  the Company's 1996 Key
Employee Stock  Incentive  Plan, as amended from time to time, is hereby further
amended in order to provide for the first  paragraph of Section 4.1 and Sections
4.1.1 through a new Section 4.1.4 thereof to read as follows:

                  4.1  Number of Shares  Available  for  Grants.  The  number of
                  Shares  reserved  for grants of Awards under the Plan shall be
                  equal to the sum of:

                  4.1.1  Six Hundred Thousand (600,000) Shares; and

                  4.1.2  one  and  one-half   percent  (1.5%)   of   the  Shares
                  outstanding  as  of  January  1,   1997  and  each  January  1
                  thereafter; and

                  4.1.3 such  number of Shares  reserved  for issuance under the
                  Prior  Plans  in  excess  of  the number of Shares as to which
                  options  have  been  awarded  thereunder  as  of the Effective
                  Date  including  any  Shares  subject  to  options  previously
                  granted  under the Prior Plans which  hereafter  shall  lapse,
                  expire, terminate or be canceled; and

                  4.1.4 such number of Shares as equals (i) the number of shares
                  of the common stock of Belmont Homes, Inc., ("Belmont Shares")
                  reserved at the effective time (the "Effective  Time")  of the
                  merger (the "Merger") of Crimson Acquisition Corp. ("Crimson")
                  with  and  into  Belmont Homes, Inc.  ("Belmont") for issuance
                  pursuant to ungranted options under the Belmont 1994 Incentive
                  Stock Plant (the "Belmont Stock Plan"),  plus (ii)  the number
                  of Belmont  Shares subject to  outstanding  options  under the
                  Belmont  Stock  Plan  which  lapse,  terminate,  expire or are
                  canceled following the Effective Time (pursuant to the express
                  terms of the options  and  the  Belmont  Stock  Plan  and  not
                  pursuant to  any action by the Company,  Belmont or  Crimson),
                  with each such numbers of  Belmont  Shares  in each case being
                  multiplied by the exchange ratio in the Merger of 0.80.


                                                      /s/ BARRY B. DONNELL
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                          Barry B. Donnell