alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION** **1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION** **906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In  connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of **VisualMED  Clinical Solutions Corp.** (the “Company”) for  the quarter ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerard Dab, Principal  Executive Officer, Secretary and a member of the Board of Directors of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|   |   |   |                                                                                                             |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | */s/ Gerald Dab*                                                                                                 |
|   |   |   | Gerard          DabPrincipal Executive Officer, Secretary anda member of the Board of DirectorsFebruary 14, 2006 |

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78r), as amended.

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York v. Emil Jedlicke. The People of the State of New York v. Giuseppe M. Caspari. The People of the State of New York v. Charles Nienhaber. The People of the State of New York v. Frank Frankenberg.

Motions to dismiss appeals granted. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §2383. Rebellion or insurrection

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §4 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §4, 35 Stat. 1088).

Word "moreover" was deleted as surplusage and minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $10,000".
### §903. Ownership, transfer, licensing, and recordation

(a) The exclusive rights in a mask work subject to protection under this chapter belong to the owner of the mask work.

(b) The owner of the exclusive rights in a mask work may transfer all of those rights, or license all or less than all of those rights, by any written instrument signed by such owner or a duly authorized agent of the owner. Such rights may be transferred or licensed by operation of law, may be bequeathed by will, and may pass as personal property by the applicable laws of intestate succession.

(c)(1) Any document pertaining to a mask work may be recorded in the Copyright Office if the document filed for recordation bears the actual signature of the person who executed it, or if it is accompanied by a sworn or official certification that it is a true copy of the original, signed document. The Register of Copyrights shall, upon receipt of the document and the fee specified pursuant to section 908(d), record the document and return it with a certificate of recordation. The recordation of any transfer or license under this paragraph gives all persons constructive notice of the facts stated in the recorded document concerning the transfer or license.

(2) In any case in which conflicting transfers of the exclusive rights in a mask work are made, the transfer first executed shall be void as against a subsequent transfer which is made for a valuable consideration and without notice of the first transfer, unless the first transfer is recorded in accordance with paragraph (1) within three months after the date on which it is executed, but in no case later than the day before the date of such subsequent transfer.

(d) Mask works prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person's official duties are not protected under this chapter, but the United States Government is not precluded from receiving and holding exclusive rights in mask works transferred to the Government under subsection (b).

(Added Pub. L. 98–620, title III, §302, Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3349.)
### §3489. Discovery and inspection—(Rule)

#### See Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

Inspection of documents and papers taken from defendant, Rule 16.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 834.)
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-1716-09

RAYMOND WAIER WIRTH, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON THE STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW 

FROM THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

FANNIN COUNTY

JOHNSON, J., delivered the opinion of the Court in which KELLER, P.J., PRICE,

WOMACK, KEASLER, HERVEY, HOLCOMB, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined. MEYERS, J.,

dissented.

O P I N I O N

Appellant was indicted for the offense of theft of property over $200,000 pursuant to one

scheme and continuing course of conduct. TEX. PENAL CODE § 31.03 (a). A jury convicted

appellant of the lesser offense of theft of $20,000 or more but less than $100,000, assessed a

punishment of ten years’ imprisonment and a $10,000 fine, and recommended community

supervision. Wirth v. State, 296 S.W.3d 895, 897 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2009). The trial court

sentenced appellant to ten years’ incarceration, probated for five years, fined him $10,000, and
2

ordered him to pay restitution of $128,103.27.

In the court of appeals, appellant argued that the evidence was legally and factually

insufficient to support the verdict because the evidence could not support a finding of intent to

commit theft. The court of appeals held that the evidence was factually insufficient to support the

verdict, pursuant to Clewis v. State, 922 S.W.2d 126 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Wirth v. State, 296

S.W.3d 895 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2009)(delivered September 28, 2009).

At the time that the court of appeals considered this case, this Court had not issued its

opinion in Brooks v. State, ___ S.W.3d ___, 2010 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1240 (Tex. Crim. App.

No. PD-0210-09, delivered October 6, 2010), in which we overruled Clewis. We therefore vacate

the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the case to that court for reconsideration pursuant

to Brooks.

Delivered: December 15, 2010

Publish
905 A.2d 384

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner, v. Stewart P. HOOVER, Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG No. 3,

Sept. Term, 2006.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Aug. 10, 2006.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Petition for disciplinary remedial based upon reciprocal discipline and filed in the above matter in accordance with Md. Rules 16-751 and 16-773 and no response having been made by Stewart P. Hoover, the respondent, to the show cause order, it is this 10th day of August 2006

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Stewart P. Hoover be, and he is hereby, disbarred effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall forthwith strike the name Stewart P. Hoover from the register of attorneys in this Court and shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State in accordance with Rule 16-760(e)
### §2153. Destruction of war material, war premises, or war utilities

(a) Whoever, when the United States is at war, or in times of national emergency as declared by the President or by the Congress, with intent to injure, interfere with, or obstruct the United States or any associate nation in preparing for or carrying on the war or defense activities, or, with reason to believe that his act may injure, interfere with, or obstruct the United States or any associate nation in preparing for or carrying on the war or defense activities, willfully injures, destroys, contaminates or infects, or attempts to so injure, destroy, contaminate or infect any war material, war premises, or war utilities, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than thirty years, or both.

(b) If two or more persons conspire to violate this section, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be punished as provided in subsection (a) of this section.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 799; June 30, 1953, ch. 175, §2, 67 Stat. 133; Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1261, title I, §102, 68 Stat. 1217; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on section 102 of title 50, U.S.C., 1940 ed., War and National Defense (Apr. 20, 1918, ch. 59, §2, 40 Stat. 534).

"As herein defined" was deleted as surplusage.

The conspiracy provisions are new. Their addition to the section was strongly urged by the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice, considering the gravity of the substantive offense as evidenced by the prescribed punishment therefor. The punishment provisions of the general conspiracy statute, section 371 of this title, are inadequate.

Words "upon conviction thereof" were omitted as unnecessary since punishment cannot be imposed until a conviction is secured.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $10,000".

1954—Act Sept. 3, 1954, made section applicable in time of national emergency as well as war, and recognized the possibility of bacteriological warfare by making "contamination" a crime.

1953—Subsec. (a). Act June 30, 1953, inserted "or defense activities" after "carrying on the war".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeals

Act June 30, 1953, ch. 175, §7, 67 Stat. 134, repealed Joint Res. July 3, 1952, ch. 570, §1(a)(29), 66 Stat. 333; Joint Res. Mar. 31, 1953, ch. 13, §1, 67 Stat. 18, formerly cited as credits to this section and also formerly set out as a note under this section.
### §1164. Destroying boundary and warning signs

Whoever willfully destroys, defaces, or removes any sign erected by an Indian tribe, or a Government agency (1) to indicate the boundary of an Indian reservation or of any Indian country as defined in section 1151 of this title or (2) to give notice that hunting, trapping, or fishing is not permitted thereon without lawful authority or permission, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.

(Added Pub. L. 86–634, §1, July 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 469; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(E), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2146.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $250".
### §1316. Fees

The Administrator shall by regulation set reasonable fees for the filing of applications to register designs under this chapter and for other services relating to the administration of this chapter, taking into consideration the cost of providing these services and the benefit of a public record.

(Added Pub. L. 105–304, title V, §502, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2912.)
### §824g. Ascertainment of cost of property and depreciation

#### (a) Investigation of property costs

The Commission may investigate and ascertain the actual legitimate cost of the property of every public utility, the depreciation therein, and, when found necessary for rate-making purposes, other facts which bear on the determination of such cost or depreciation, and the fair value of such property.

#### (b) Request for inventory and cost statements

Every public utility upon request shall file with the Commission an inventory of all or any part of its property and a statement of the original cost thereof, and shall keep the Commission informed regarding the cost of all additions, betterments, extensions, and new construction.

(June 10, 1920, ch. 285, pt. II, §208, as added Aug. 26, 1935, ch. 687, title II, §213, 49 Stat. 853.)
§ 35.10 Limitation on Department's authority. ( a ) An award, compromise or settlement of a claim hereunder in excess of $25,000 shall be effected only with the prior written approval of the Attorney General or his designee. For the purposes of this paragraph, a principal claim and any derivative or subrogated claim shall be treated as a single claim.
( b ) An administrative claim may be adjusted, determined, compromised or settled hereunder only after consultation with the Department of Justice when, in the opinion of the Department: ( 1 ) A new precedent or a new point of law is involved; or
( 2 ) A question of policy is or may be involved; or
( 3 ) The United States is or may be entitled to indemnity or contribution from a third party and the Department is unable to adjust the third party claim; or
( 4 ) The compromise of a particular claim, as a practical matter, will or may control the disposition of a related claim in which the amount to be paid may exceed $25,000.
( c ) An administrative claim may be adjusted, determined, compromised or settled only after consultation with the Department of Justice when it is learned that the United States or an employee, agent or cost plus contractor of the United States is involved in litigation based on a claim arising out of the same incident or transaction.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nathaniel R. Sherman, Appellant.

The defendant, having failed to prosecute his appeal with reasonable diligence, the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 3 - 0093 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 1 -NM - 1 09 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 10.14

                         SunGard(R) Data Systems Inc.

                                Amendment No. 1
                                      to
                          1994 Equity Incentive Plan


In accordance with the resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of SunGard
Data Systems Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Company"), at its meeting held on
November 15, 1999, the SunGard Data Systems Inc. 1994 Equity Incentive Plan
("Plan") is amended as follows:

1.    Section 11.3 of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

          "None of a Participant's rights under any Award or under the Plan may
          be assigned or transferred in any manner other than by will or under
          the laws of descent and distribution. The foregoing shall not,
          however, restrict a Participant's rights with respect to Unrestricted
          Stock or the outright transfer of cash, nor shall it restrict the
          ability of a Participant's heirs, estate, beneficiaries, or personal
          or legal representatives to enforce the terms of the Plan with respect
          to Awards granted to the Participant. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
          at the discretion of the Committee, an Award (other than an ISO) may
          permit the transferability of such Award by a Participant solely to
          members of the Participant's immediate family or trusts or family
          partnerships for the benefit of the Participant and/or members of the
          Participant's immediate family to the extent provided in such Award."

3.    The effective date of this Amendment No. 1 is November 15, 1999.



Date: November 15, 1999             SunGard Data Systems Inc.


                                    By: /s/ James L. Mann
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                           James L. Mann, Chairman, President
                                              and Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 382

 376

 353

 350

 341

 352

 384

 398

 366

 424

 383

 419

 424

 464

 391

 387

 394

 395

 410

 440

 417

 429

 462

 470

 497

 0

 0

 0

 0

 450

 488

 359

 355

 319

 302

 299

 297

 299

 322

 318

 306

 336

 317

 336

 342

 361

 341

 333

 305

 325

 321

 328

 318

 333

 344

 361

 0

 0

 0

 0

 375

 377

 371

 364

 342

 328

 321

 328

 337

 345

 341

 349

 356

 362

 380

 388

 380

 363

 364

 346

 355

 366

 367

 370

 388

 387

 408

 0

 0

 0

 0

 424

 437

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 15, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 245

 241

 227

 219

 214

 219

 224

 229

 227

 232

 236

 240

 251

 256

 251

 240

 241

 230

 235

 242

 243

 245

 256

 255

 268

 0

 0

 0

 0

 278

 286

TOTAL 9,867

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
!" 








#$%$&' &$( )*+&$( $ ,(	 ' 
-)

!" ( .&/) 0/,-&
)"$12
-)+&$31!%456(&/'

",7$++&") 8 6  )&$"9%&$'%6) (&$'

(//-

 
 &$8-/'$
-)+&$$7)/,6:!" 

 '$'&(&' &$8

:  ( 6) $ '$	 ' ( !" 
 $'
-)

;,

)/'"/'&$$01!%4<:12
-)	 ' 3


-)	 '  =)& '!" //-%% /  ,/%'>:	/'

//,! &96? .//6@& 8&$&::AA12B  ,3 )$' 8$$ 

"( 
)8)C6:(!" (&/'%0/,6
-)	 '  =)& '

!"  "( ) $
0" 56:$'-%)-,)/'$"

/'&$%$0



7$++&") 8 6=6@
 C5:

+&") 8 -.& 06B

5>C&$ &'8'6
)&:

+%$6@
::

1C<<A

)$/  )

Case 18-10777-KHK Doc 57 Filed 09/07/18 Entered 09/07/18 15:49:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 6
C 
 &$8$
0" 56:6 )  $') 

"$)$"/"&$%%B  ,!" *%)$/ '$'  $'

) !" &&$&8 &!" '&'$ 

	;.	6&&

	!!) (&$'!" "&$%$0(%) ( (&/&$8

%0/,-&
)"$&)'", )( &$%&$(B  ,6(&/&$8 9&'

%%B  , )$' 8$",
)8)C6:6$'(&/&$8 


0" 56: &$8D$'&&()  

	!! )&) &E'%$8/%4B  ,D$'&&

()  

	!!!" //9$()  %%B  ,F%-&

- &$%$$( ) ) )$()   ' (&) 

! 

#
$4 )%,7)'8

$ '$!%4

:

Sep 7 2018

/s/ Klinette Kindred

 September 7, 2018

Case 18-10777-KHK Doc 57 Filed 09/07/18 Entered 09/07/18 15:49:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 6


.	


GG7$++&") 8 

7$++&") 8 6=6@
C5:

+&") 8 -.& 06B

5>C&$ &'8'6
)&:

+%$6@& 8&$&::

B$ 1C<<A




GG+&%/7	
$'/ 

+&%/7	
$'/ 6=6@
5A55C

.& 
$'/ 6

:! ", 4) 6
)&:

;'" &'86@
::>:

B$ 1C>ACC<

	


C

Case 18-10777-KHK Doc 57 Filed 09/07/18 Entered 09/07/18 15:49:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 6
%/)/>::1 &(&%&$

 ",% &(,( 8&$8H 'I	 ' /'&$8!" &$$0

"$$' '",//$% , &

GG7$++&") 8 

7$++&") 8 

5

Case 18-10777-KHK Doc 57 Filed 09/07/18 Entered 09/07/18 15:49:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 6


	
	


&
$&$ ,$

>:	/'//,! &9

? .//6@& 8&$&::AA

<

Case 18-10777-KHK Doc 57 Filed 09/07/18 Entered 09/07/18 15:49:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 6
GG0$G ' G
%0$G'%'(G//'%GJ:><A5<:::C'%

A

Case 18-10777-KHK Doc 57 Filed 09/07/18 Entered 09/07/18 15:49:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 6
EXHIBIT 32.1


              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
       ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ulticom, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Shawn K. Osborne,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Mark A. Kissman,
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                                  /s/ Shawn K. Osborne
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Shawn K. Osborne
                                                  President and CEO
                                                  Principal Executive Officer
                                                  June 8, 2005


                                                  /s/ Mark A. Kissman
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Mark A. Kissman
                                                  Vice President of Finance and
                                                  CFO
                                                  Principal Financial Officer
                                                  June 8, 2005




This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.