alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Cite as State v. Downing , 124 Ohio St.3d 475, 2010-Ohio-716.]

T HE S TATE OF O HIO , A PPELLANT , v . D OWNING , A PPELLEE . [Cite as State v. Downing , 124 Ohio St.3d 475, 2010-Ohio-716.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Singleton. (No. 2008-2009

— Submitted January 13, 2010

— Decided March 4, 2010.) A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 08AP-48, 2008-Ohio-4463.

__________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Singleton , 124 Ohio St.3d 173, 2009-Ohio-6434, 920 N.E.2d 958

. M OYER , C.J., and P FEIFER , O’C ONNOR , O’D ONNELL , and C UPP , JJ.,

concur. L UNDBERG S TRATTON and L ANZINGER , JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of L ANZINGER , J., in State v. Singleton

.

__________________ Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecu ting Attorney, and Seth L. Gilbert and Sheryl L. Prichard, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellant. Shaw & Miller, Mark J. Miller, and Douglas W. Shaw, for appellee.

______________________
I, Robin Lecky, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Gravitas
International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
     prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: Oct 2nd 2003
/s/ Robin Lecky



<PAGE>
#### In the Matter of American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Local 1095 AFL-CIO (Erie County Blue Collar Employees Union), Affiliate of A.F.S.C.M.E. N.Y. Council 66, et al., Appellants, v County of Erie et al., Respondents.

[823 NYS2d 745]

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph G. Makowski, J.), entered February 3, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment dismissed the amended petition.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court. Present—Kehoe, J.P, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.
Transport Transports 

Canada Canada

 TP 7245E

 

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

The following airworthiness directive (AD) may be applicable to an aircraft which our records indicate is registered in your name. ADs are issued pursuant to Canadian 

Aviation Regulation (CAR) 521 Division X. Pursuant to CAR 605.84 and the further details of CAR Standard 625, Appendix H, the continuing airworthiness of a Canadian registered aircraft is contingent upon compliance with all applicable ADs. Failure to comply with the requirements of an AD may invalidate the flight authorization of the aircraft. Alternative means of compliance shall be applied for in accordance with CAR 605.84 and the above-referenced Standard. 

This AD has been issued by the Continuing Airworthiness Division (AARDG), National Aircraft Certification Branch, Transport Canada, Ottawa, telephone 613 952-4357.

Pursuant to CAR 202.51 the registered owner of a Canadian aircraft shall, within seven days, notify the Minister in writing of any change of his or her name or address. 

To request a change of address, contact the Civil Aviation Communications Centre (AARC) at Place de Ville, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N8, or 1-800-305-2059, or www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/communications/centre/ address.asp 

24-0022 (01-2005)

1/1 No.

CF-2011-14

Issue Date 

 17 June 2011 

Number: CF- 2011-14 

Subject: Main Landing Gear Retraction Actuator - Retract Port Flexible Hose Failure

Effective: 6 July 2011 

Applicability: Bombardier Inc. DHC-8 Aeroplanes, Models 400, 401 and 402, Serial Numbers 4001 

and subsequent.

Compliance: As indicated below. 

Background: Testing has shown that in the event of a main landing gear (MLG) retraction actuator 

retract port flexible hose failure, in-flight vibrations may cause excessive hydraulic fluid 

leakage. This could potentially lead to an undamped extension of the MLG, which may 

result in MLG structural failure, leading to an unsafe asymmetric landing configuration. 

This directive mandates the inspection of the retract port flexible hose and its 

replacement, when required, to prevent damage to the MLG caused by undamped gear 

extensions. 

Corrective 

Actions: 

Initial and Repetitive Inspections of the MLG Retraction Actuator - Retract Port 

Flexible Hydraulic Hose 

In accordance with the following schedule: 

A. Initially, within 600 hours air time from the effective date of this directive; and 

B. Subsequently, at intervals not to exceed 600 hours air time from the previous 

inspection 

Perform a detailed inspection of the left and right MLG retraction - actuator retract port 

flexible hose, and replace as required, in accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-89, dated 22 March 2011, or later 

revision approved by the Chief, Continuing Airworthiness, Transport Canada. 

Authorization: For the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities 

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY

Derek Ferguson 

Chief, Continuing Airworthiness 

Contact: Miss Helen Tsai, Continuing Airworthiness, Ottawa, telephone 613-952-4357, facsimile 

613-996-9178 or e-mail CAWWEBFeedback@tc.gc.ca or any Transport Canada Centre.
### §719a. Junior Duck Stamp

#### (a) Competition

As part of the Program, the Secretary may annually conduct a competition to—

(1) solicit the submission by students at elementary and secondary schools of designs relating to conservation of migratory birds; and

(2) select winning designs from among those submissions for use for licensing and marketing under subsection (b).

#### (b) Licensing and marketing of design of Junior Duck Stamps

As part of the Program, the Secretary may—

(1) license and market winning designs selected in competitions under subsection (a); and

(2) license and market stamps bearing those designs, which shall be known as Junior Duck Stamps.

#### (c) Use of proceeds

Amounts received under subsection (b)—

(1) 1 shall be available to the Secretary until expended, without further appropriations, solely for—

(A) awards, prizes, and scholarships to individuals who submit designs in competitions under subsection (a), that are—

(i) selected in such a competition as winning designs; or

(ii) otherwise determined in such a competition to be superior;

(B) awards and prizes to schools, students, teachers, and other participants to further education activities related to the conservation education goals of the Program;

(C) award ceremonies for winners of national and State Junior Duck Stamp competitions;

(D) travel expenses for winners of national and State Junior Duck Stamp competitions to award ceremonies, if—

(i) the event is intended to honor students for winning a national competition; or

(ii) the event is intended to honor students for winning a State competition;

(E) expenses for licensing and marketing under subsection (b);

(F) expenses for migratory bird reference materials or supplies awarded to schools that participate in the Program; and

(G) expenses for marketing and educational materials developed to promote the Program; 2

(Pub. L. 103–340, §3, Oct. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 3119; Pub. L. 109–166, §2, Jan. 10, 2006, 119 Stat. 3576.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 109–166 amended heading and text of subsec. (c) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Amounts received under subsection (b) of this section—

"(1) shall be available to the Secretary until expended, without further appropriations, solely for—

"(A) awards and scholarships to individuals who submit designs in competitions under subsection (a) of this section, that are—

"(i) selected in such a competition as winning designs; or

"(ii) otherwise determined in such a competition to be superior;

"(B) awards to schools and other participants to further education activities related to the conservation education goals of the Program; and

"(C) expenses for licensing and marketing under subsection (b) of this section; and

"(2) may not be used for administrative expenses of the Program."

1 So in original. Subsec. (c), as amended by Pub. L. 109–166, does not contain a par. (2).

2 So in original.
### §6236. Ministerial issuance, or amendment authorization

#### (a) NEPA exception

The ministerial issuance or amendment of an organizational camp special use authorization shall not be subject to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).

#### (b) Rule of construction

For purposes of subsection (a), the ministerial issuance or amendment of an authorization occurs only when the issuance or amendment of the authorization would not change the physical environment or the activities, facilities, or program of the operations governed by the authorization, and at least one of the following apply:

(1) The authorization is issued upon a change in control of the holder of an existing authorization.

(2) The holder, upon expiration of an authorization, is issued a new authorization.

(3) The authorization is amended—

(A) to effectuate administrative changes, such as modification of the land use fee or conversion to a new special use authorization form; or

(B) to include nondiscretionary environmental standards or to conform with current law.

(Pub. L. 108–7, div. F, title V, §507, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 297.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 91–190, Jan. 1, 1970, 83 Stat. 852, which is classified generally to chapter 55 (§4321 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4321 of Title 42 and Tables.
### §45a–2. Exchange of certain lands for lands conveyed to United States

In exchange for the conveyance to the United States of tract A, as provided in section 45a–1 of this title, the Secretary is authorized, in his discretion, to patent to the owner of tract A, subject to such terms and conditions as the Secretary may deem necessary, certain lands of approximately equal value described as follows:

Tract D. A portion of the southeast quarter of section 33, township 16 south, range 29 east, Mount Diablo meridian, Tulare County, California, comprising approximately two and fifty one-hundredths acres.

In exchange for the conveyance to the United States of tracts B and C, as provided in section 45a–1 of this title, the Secretary is authorized to patent, in a similar manner, to the owner of tracts B and C certain lands of approximately equal value described as follows:

Tract E. The southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of section 4, which shall be subject to section 818 of this title; the south half of the northeast quarter of section 5; and approximately sixty-eight acres of the north half of the southeast quarter of section 5, which shall not include the surveyed two-hundred-foot strip as shown on map "D" of exhibit "K", entitled "Detailed Map of Kaweah Project of the Southern California Edison Company, Ltd.", and filed in the office of the Federal Power Commission on December 12, 1923; all of said lands in tract E being situated in township 17 south, range 29 east, Mount Diablo meridian, comprising approximately one hundred and eighty-eight acres.

(Dec. 21, 1943, ch. 372, §2, 57 Stat. 606.)
4844-4451-8758.1 

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

RICHMOND DIVISION 

 ) 

In re: ) Chapter 7 

 ) 

DELTA CAREER EDUCATION ) Case No. 18-33822 

CORPORATION, et al.,

1

 ) 

 ) 

 Debtor. ) 

 ) 

NOTICE OF FILING OF CHAPTER 7 PETITIONS AND 

JOINT ADMINISTRATIONMOTION AND OF PROPOSED HEARING ON JOINT 

ADMINISTRATION MOTION 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT on July 26 and July 27, 2018, the above-captioned 

Debtors

Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division (the Court

petitions for relief under chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101-1532 

Bankruptcy Code -captioned chapter 11 cases. 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT together with their chapter 7 petitions, 

Hearing

and (ii) Granting Related Relief Joint Administration Motion

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT the Court has scheduled the Hearing on 

August 1, 2018, at 2:00 p.m., prevailing Eastern Time in Courtroom 5100 of the United States 

 

1

 The Debtors in these chapter 7 

number, include Delta Career Education Corporation (5135); Delta Educational Systems, Inc. (9702); National 

Career Education, Inc. (3855); Southwest Business Colleges, Inc. (3438); Creative Circus, Inc. (1026); Atlantic 

Coast Colleges, Inc. (4068); McCann Education Centers, Inc. (2761); Berks Technical Institute, Inc. (9439); 

McCann School of Business and Technology (2608); Miller-Motte Business College, Inc. (1751); Palmetto 

Technical College, Inc. (6130); Piedmont Business Colleges, Inc. (4202); Academy of Court Reporting, Inc. 

(3484); and The Miami-Jacobs Business College Company (9487). T 

Case 18-33822-KLP Doc 5 Filed 07/27/18 Entered 07/27/18 14:47:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
 7 

4844-4451-8758.1 

Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division, 701 East Broad 

Street, Richmond, Virginia, 23219. 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT a copy of the Joint Administration 

http://www.vaeb.uscourts.gov in accordance 

with the procedures and fees set forth therein. 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT your rights may be affected. You 

should carefully read the Joint Administration Motion and discuss it with your attorney, if 

you have one in these chapter 7 cases. If you do not have an attorney, you may wish to 

consult with one. 

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT if you do not want the Court to grant the 

relief requested in the Joint Administration Motion, or if you want the Court to consider your 

views on the Joint Administration Motion, then you or your attorney must attend the Hearing. If 

you or your attorney do not take these steps, the Court may decide that you do not oppose the 

relief sought in the Joint Administration Motion and may enter an order granting the relief 

requested in the Joint Administration Motion. 

 /s/ Peter J. Barrett 

KUTAK ROCK LLP 

Loc Pfeiffer (VSB No. 39632) 

Peter J. Barrett (VSB No. 46179) 

901 East Byrd Street, Suite 1000 

Richmond, Virginia 23219 

804-644-1700 

loc.pfeiffer@kutakrock.com 

peter.barrett@kutakrock.com 

Counsel to the Debtors 

Case 18-33822-KLP Doc 5 Filed 07/27/18 Entered 07/27/18 14:47:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
### §3581. Sentence of imprisonment

(a) In General.—A defendant who has been found guilty of an offense may be sentenced to a term of imprisonment.

(b) Authorized Terms.—The authorized terms of imprisonment are—

(1) for a Class A felony, the duration of the defendant's life or any period of time;

(2) for a Class B felony, not more than twenty-five years;

(3) for a Class C felony, not more than twelve years;

(4) for a Class D felony, not more than six years;

(5) for a Class E felony, not more than three years;

(6) for a Class A misdemeanor, not more than one year;

(7) for a Class B misdemeanor, not more than six months;

(8) for a Class C misdemeanor, not more than thirty days; and

(9) for an infraction, not more than five days.

(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §212(a)(2), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1998.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Nov. 1, 1987, and applicable only to offenses committed after the taking effect of this section, see section 235(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as a note under section 3551 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nicola Brunori, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

Judgment and order affirmed. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
§ 386.32 What are allowable costs? In addition to those allowable costs established in the Education Department General Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR 75.530 through 75.562, the following items are allowable under long-term training projects: ( a ) Student stipends.
( b ) Tuition and fees.
( c ) Books and supplies.
( d ) Student travel in conjunction with training assignments.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 302 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 772)
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEnhancement of High-Speed Infrared Array Electronics (Center Director's Discretionary Fund)A state-of-the-art infrared detector was to be used as the sensor in a new spectrometer-camera for astronomical observations. The sensitivity of the detector required the use of low-noise, high-speed electronics in the system design. The key component in the electronic system was the pre-amplifier that amplified the low voltage signal coming from the detector. The system was designed based on the selection of the amplifier and that was driven by the maximum noise level, which would yield the desired sensitivity for the telescope system.Document ID19970003313Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSutherland, W. T.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1996Subject CategoryElectronics And Electrical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNASA TM-108515NAS 1.15:108515Accession Number97N12057Funding Number(s)PROJECT: Proj. 93-03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970003313.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### **CHAPTER 211—JURISDICTION AND VENUE**

Sec.
3231.
District courts.
3232.
District of offense—Rule.
3233.
Transfer within district—Rule.
3234.
Change of venue to another district—Rule.
3235.
Venue in capital cases.
3236.
Murder or manslaughter.
3237.
Offenses begun in one district and completed in another.
3238.
Offenses not committed in any district.
3239.
Optional venue for espionage and related offenses.
3240.
Creation of new district or division.
3241.
Jurisdiction of offenses under certain sections.
3242.
Indians committing certain offenses; acts on reservations.
3243.
Jurisdiction of State of Kansas over offenses committed by or against Indians on Indian reservations.
3244.
Jurisdiction of proceedings relating to transferred offenders.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXII, §320909(b), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2127, added item 3239.

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §1204(b), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2152, struck out item 3239 "Threatening communications".

**1978**—Pub. L. 95–598, title III, §314(j)(2), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2678, added item 3244.
§ 271.1 Procedures for inspections. ( a ) *Applicability.* The following terms and conditions apply to those owners or operators of railroad lines, international bridges, or toll roads, which provide a means for an alien to come to the United States.
( b ) *Inspection of facility.* Based upon a written request by the owners or operators, the INS district director or his designee shall inspect the facility or method utilized in order to ensure that owners and operators have acted diligently in taking adequate steps to prevent the unlawful entry of aliens into the United States. Such measures may include but are not necessarily limited to fencing, barricades, lighting, or security guards. If the district director determines that preventive measures are inadequate, he or she shall advise the owners or operators in writing, citing the reasons for such determination. If the owners or operators believe the requirements of the district director to be excessive or unnecessary, they may request that the Regional Commissioner having jurisdiction over the location where the facility is located, review the district director's requirements. The Regional Commissioner shall advise the owners or operators in writing of the results of his or her review.
( c ) *Preventive measures and certification.* Upon a determination by the district director that reasonable and adequate preventive measures have been taken by the owners and operators, he or she shall certify that the owners and operators shall not be liable for the penalty described in section 271(a), so long as the facility or method utilized is maintained in the condition in which approved and certified.
( d ) *Revocation of certification.* The District Director having jurisdiction over the location where the facility is located, in his or her discretion, may at any time, conduct an inspection of said facility to determine if any violation is occurring. If the facility is found to be not in compliance, said certification will be revoked.
[53 FR 26036, July 11, 1988]