alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

In re: )

)

GERMAN SALAZAR, ) Case No. 12-13003-BFK

) Chapter 7

Debtor. )

_______________________________________ )

)

GERMAN SALAZAR, )

)

Plaintiff, ) Adversary Proceeding

v. ) No. 17-01102-BFK

)

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. D/B/A, )

CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC )

AND )

THOMAS P. GORMAN, AS TRUSTEE, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

WHY ADVERSARY PROCEEDING 

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

The Debtor in this case filed a Voluntary Petition under Chapter 13 on May 10, 2012. 

Case No. 12-13003-BFK. The Court confirmed a Chapter 13 Plan on December 12, 2012. Id.,

Docket No. 33. The Order Confirming the Debtor’s Chapter 13 Plan provided: 

Any lien avoidance action[](s) contemplated by Section 7(B) of the Plan must be

made by the filing of an Adversary Proceeding no later than sixty (60) days from 

the date of the entry of this Order.

Id., ¶ 6. 

The Chapter 13 Trustee filed a Final Report and Account on October 6, 2017. Case No. 

12-13003-BFK, Docket No. 60. The Plaintiff filed this adversary proceeding on October 17, 

2017 – almost five years after confirmation of the Debtor’s Plan. 

Case 17-01102-BFK Doc 9 Filed 02/13/18 Entered 02/13/18 14:50:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
In the adversary proceeding, the Plaintiff did not serve the Summons when it was issued. 

On November 6, 2017, the Debtor requested an Alias Summons, which was issued by the Clerk 

on December 19, 2017. Docket Nos. 5, 6. Bankruptcy Rule 7004(a) incorporates Rule 4(m) of 

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which requires that service be completed within 90 days 

after the filing of the complaint, unless the Plaintiff can show good cause for the failure to serve 

the summons and complaint. 

It is therefore ORDERED: 

1. Plaintiff’s counsel shall appear before this Court on March 20, 2018, at 9:30

a.m., to show cause why this adversary proceeding should not be dismissed for: (a) failure to file

the adversary proceeding within 60 days of confirmation of the Debtor’s Plan, as required by 

Paragraph 6 of the Order Confirming the Debtor’s Plan; and (b) failure to serve the Summons 

and Complaint within 90 days as required by Bankruptcy Rule 7004(a). 

2. The Clerk will mail copies of this Order, or will provide cm-ecf notice of its

_______________________________

Brian F. Kenney 

United States Bankruptcy Judge 

entry, to the parties below.

Date: ________________

Alexandria, Virginia

Copies to:

Alisa Lachow Correa

4196 Merchant Plaza, Suite 

706 Woodbridge, VA 22192

Counsel to Debtor 

German Salazar

8665 Night Watch Ct., Bristow, 

VA 20136

Debtor

JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. d/b/a Chase 

Home Finance

Registered Agent: CT Corporation System 

1201 Peachtree Street NE 

Atlanta, GA 30361 

Defendant 

Thomas P. Gorman 

Chapter 13 Trustee 

300 North Washington Street, Suite 400 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

Defendant 

Feb 12 2018 /s/ Brian F. Kenney

Entered on Docket:2/13/18 sas

Case 17-01102-BFK Doc 9 Filed 02/13/18 Entered 02/13/18 14:50:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
§ 300.603 Secretary's review and determination regarding State performance. ( a ) *Review.* The Secretary annually reviews the State's performance report submitted pursuant to § 300.602(b)(2).
( b ) *Determination* — ( 1 ) *General.* Based on the information provided by the State in the State's annual performance report, information obtained through monitoring visits, and any other public information made available, the Secretary determines if the State— ( i ) Meets the requirements and purposes of Part B of the Act;
( ii ) Needs assistance in implementing the requirements of Part B of the Act;
( iii ) Needs intervention in implementing the requirements of Part B of the Act; or
( iv ) Needs substantial intervention in implementing the requirements of Part B of the Act.
( 2 ) *Notice and opportunity for a hearing.* ( i ) For determinations made under paragraphs (b)(1)(iii) and (b)(1)(iv) of this section, the Secretary provides reasonable notice and an opportunity for a hearing on those determinations.
( ii ) The hearing described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section consists of an opportunity to meet with the Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services to demonstrate why the Department should not make the determination described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1416(d))
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 58 (Friday, March 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 16802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6761]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5477-N-12]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juanita Perry, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565 (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.DC), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: March 17, 2011.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant. Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. 2011-6761 Filed 3-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 4,411

 4,624

 5,535

 6,128

 6,731

 7,455

 8,617

 8,807

 8,537

 7,850

 7,403

 6,040

 6,379

 6,924

 6,902

 7,212

 8,201

 8,405

 8,145

 9,335

 9,054

 7,687

 7,635

 8,774

 8,769

 9,890

 8,730

 9,489

 9,556

 10,344

 10,776

 745

 696

 458

 390

 457

 518

 575

 619

 831

 995

 1,204

 971

 1,640

 2,047

 2,116

 1,280

 1,231

 1,233

 925

 1,313

 1,588

 1,158

 896

 1,187

 1,634

 3,254

 3,436

 3,903

 3,662

 2,739

 2,329

 2,048

 2,212

 2,297

 2,692

 3,106

 3,472

 3,849

 3,657

 3,937

 4,113

 4,015

 3,611

 3,809

 4,113

 3,982

 3,690

 4,105

 4,255

 4,363

 4,775

 4,798

 4,173

 3,704

 4,200

 5,088

 6,261

 5,971

 6,100

 5,854

 5,708

 5,830

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 9, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 23.1

                      Consent of Independent Accountants


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-6425, 33-14984, 33-33602, 33-42345,
33-69650, 33-58515, 33-64901, 333-15641, 333-39151, 333-43969, 333-46187, 333-
53793, 333-57381, 333-73159, 333-84095 and 333-33888), on Form S-3 (Registration
Nos. 333-45541, 333-59129, 333-65831, 333-75735, 333-75737, 333-83627, 333-88545
and 333-88733), and on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-82695) of SunGard Data
Systems Inc. of our report dated February 8, 2001 relating to the financial
statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Stockholders, which is
incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


March 29, 2001
#### The Farmers’ Loan and Trust Company, as Trustee under the Last Will and Testament of Frances R. Mortimer, Deceased, etc., Respondent, v. New York Finance Company and Others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §92a. Rights-of-way for railways, tramways, and cable lines

The provisions of section 92 of this title, granting rights-of-way, under such restrictions and regulations as the Secretary of the Interior may establish, to any railway or tramway company or companies for the purpose of building, constructing, and operating a railway, constructing and operating a railway or tramway line or lines, so far as the same relate to lands within the Mount Rainier National Park, Washington, are repealed: Provided, however, That nothing herein shall be construed so as to prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from authorizing the use of land in said park under contract, permit, lease, or otherwise for the establishment and operation thereon of a tramway or cable line, or lines, for the accommodation or convenience of visitors and others.

(Jan. 26, 1931, ch. 47, §6, 46 Stat. 1044.)
§ 463.26 What activities are considered local administrative costs? An eligible provider receiving a grant or contract under this part may consider costs incurred in connection with the following activities to be administrative costs: ( a ) Planning;
( b ) Administration, including carrying out performance accountability requirements;
( c ) Professional development;
( d ) Providing adult education and literacy services in alignment with local workforce plans, including promoting co-enrollment in programs and activities under title I, as appropriate; and
( e ) Carrying out the one-stop partner responsibilities described in § 678.420, including contributing to the infrastructure costs of the one-stop delivery system.
(Authority: 29 U.S.C. 3323, 3322, 3151)
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunale di Tolmezzo by order of that Court of 16 June 2004 in the case of Azienda Agricola Franco Piemonte against Azienda per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA)

(Case C-272/04)

(2004/C 228/46)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Tribunale di Tolmezzo (District Court, Tolmezzo, Italy) of 16 June 2004, received at the Court Registry on 25 June 2004, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Azienda Agricola Franco Piemonte against Azienda per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA) on the following question:

Must Article 1 of Regulation (EEC) No 856/84 (1) of 31 March 1984 and Articles 1 to 4 of Regulation No 3950/92 (2) of 28 December 1992 be interpreted as meaning that the additional levy on milk and milk products is in the nature of an administrative penalty with the result that producers are liable to pay it only where quantities allocated have been exceeded by them intentionally or as a result of negligence?

----

(1)  OJ 1984 L 90, p. 10.

(2)  OJ 1992 L 405, p. 1.

----
§ 214.215 USCIS employee referral. ( a ) Any USCIS employee who, while carrying out their official duties, comes into contact with a noncitizen believed to be a victim of a severe form of trafficking in persons and is not already working with an LEA may consult, as necessary, with the ICE officials responsible for victim protection, trafficking investigations and prevention, and deterrence.
( b ) The ICE office may, in turn, refer the victim to another LEA with responsibility for detecting, investigating, or prosecuting acts of trafficking.
( c ) If the noncitizen has a credible claim to victimization, USCIS may advise the individual that they can submit an Application for T Nonimmigrant Status and seek any other benefit or protection for which they may be eligible, provided doing so would not compromise the noncitizen's safety.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of BlastGard International, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the company on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended September 30, 2004, as amended, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the companys financial condition and results of operations.



March 15,
2005



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael J. Gordon                     
|Michael J. Gordon, Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Altrimega   Health
Corporation  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  each of the  undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates
indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition and results of operation of the
Company.


Date:             November 18, 2003              By:    /s/ Ron Hendrix
                                                        -----------------------
                                                 Name:  Ron Hendrix
                                                 Title: Chief Financial Officer

         A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906,
or other document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise adopting the
signature  that  appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this
written  statement  required by Section  906,  has been  provided to Altrimega
Health  Corporation and will be retained by Altrimega  Health  Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
May 28, 2015

Mr. Michael A DeMita Tower Capital Advisors, LLC

353 Tellico Road Canton, GA 30115

Dear Mr. DeMita:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 22, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1112), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
### §1595A. Civil injunctions

(a) In General.—Whenever it shall appear that any person is engaged or is about to engage in any act that constitutes or will constitute a violation of this chapter, chapter 110, or chapter 117, or a conspiracy under section 371 to commit a violation of this chapter, chapter 110, or chapter 117, the Attorney General may bring a civil action in a district court of the United States seeking an order to enjoin such act.

(b) Action by Court.—The court shall proceed as soon as practicable to the hearing and determination of a civil action brought under subsection (a), and may, at any time before final determination, enter such a restraining order or prohibition, or take such other action, as is warranted to prevent a continuing and substantial injury to the United States or to any person or class of persons for whose protection the civil action is brought.

(c) Procedure.—

(1) In general.—A proceeding under this section shall be governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, except that, if an indictment has been returned against the respondent, discovery shall be governed by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

(2) Sealed proceedings.—If a civil action is brought under subsection (a) before an indictment is returned against the respondent or while an indictment against the respondent is under seal—

(A) the court shall place the civil action under seal; and

(B) when the indictment is unsealed, the court shall unseal the civil action unless good cause exists to keep the civil action under seal.

(d) Rule of Construction.—Nothing in this section shall be construed or applied so as to abridge the exercise of rights guaranteed under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 115–393, title II, §201(a), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5266.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (c)(1), are set out in the Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, referred to in subsec. (c)(1), are set out in the Appendix to this title.
§ 200.62 Responsibilities for providing services to private school children. ( a ) After timely and meaningful consultation with appropriate officials of private schools, an LEA must— ( 1 ) In accordance with §§ 200.62 through 200.67 and section 1117 of the ESEA, provide, individually or in combination, as requested by private school officials to best meet the needs of eligible children, special educational services, instructional services (including evaluations to determine the progress being made in meeting such students' academic needs), counseling, mentoring, one-on-one tutoring, or other benefits under this subpart (such as dual or concurrent enrollment, educational radio and television, computer equipment and materials, other technology, and mobile educational services and equipment) that address their needs, on an equitable basis and in a timely manner, to eligible children who are enrolled in private elementary and secondary schools; and
( 2 ) Ensure that teachers and families of participating private school children participate, on an equitable basis, in accordance with § 200.65 in services and activities developed pursuant to section 1116 of the ESEA.
( b ) ( 1 ) Eligible private school children are children who— ( i ) Reside in participating public school attendance areas of the LEA, regardless of whether the private school they attend is located in the LEA; and
( ii ) Meet the criteria in section 1115(c) of the ESEA.
( 2 ) Among the eligible private school children, the LEA must select children to participate, consistent with § 200.64.
( c ) The services and other benefits an LEA provides under this section must be secular, neutral and nonideological.
[82 FR 31709, July 7, 2017, as amended at 84 FR 31674, July 2, 2019]
# Official Journal L 110/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.110.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 110 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5620 April 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.110.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 110

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5620 April 2013

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 361/2013 of 19 April 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 362/2013 of 19 April 2013 on the issue of import licences and the allocation of import rights for applications lodged during the first seven days of April 2013 under the tariff quotas opened by Regulation (EC) No 616/2007 for poultrymeat | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 361/2013 of 19 April 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 362/2013 of 19 April 2013 on the issue of import licences and the allocation of import rights for applications lodged during the first seven days of April 2013 under the tariff quotas opened by Regulation (EC) No 616/2007 for poultrymeat

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
-88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

34 36 38 40 42


### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/22 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
#### In the Matter of the Charges Preferred against Joseph Van Order, Member of the Fire Department Connected with Engine Number Four.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
#### § 106.6 DHS severability.

The provisions of this part are separate and severable from one another. If any provision is stayed or determined to be invalid, or held unenforceable as to any person or circumstance, the remaining provisions and applications will continue in effect.
(No. 74-CC-631

#### Lawrence Eugene Bayly, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 15, 1974.*

Lawrence Eugene Bayly, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Mojave National Preserve 2007business plan**
 
Parts: 010203
 
SuDoc Number:I 29.2:M 72/2
Item Number:0648 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001008855
 
August 7, 2019