alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 1 0 716 Summary Calendar

CHRISTINE KELLAM , Plaintiff

–

Appell ant,

versus
METROCARE SERVICES , Defendant

– Appell ee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the North ern District of Texas USDC No. 3:12

- CV

- 352

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT , Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: *

Christine Kellam sued her employer under the Americans with Dis

abili ti es Act and the Family Medical Leave Act. The district court granted

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 31, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-10716 Document: 00512579164 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/31/2014No. 1 3

- 1 0 716

sum mary judgment for the employer, explaining its reasons in a thorough and

con vinc ing thirteen

- page opinion. Kellam complained that, while out on family medical leave, she was noti

fied that she was to be terminated because of across
- the

- board staff reductions resulting fr om decreased funding . She was given the chance to apply for posi

p tions at other locations but did not take that opportunity. She received the full benefit of her medical leave before the termination. As the district court explained, Kellam has present ed no evidence that her termination was for any prohibited purpose or for any reason other than the employer

- wide substantial reductions in force. The summary judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons carefully stated by the district court.

2 Case: 13-10716 Document: 00512579164 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/31/2014
### §482q. Perfection of mining claims within forest

Valid mining claims within the said lands, existing on July 12, 1951, and thereafter maintained in compliance with the law under which they were initiated and the laws of the State of Arizona, may be perfected under sections 482o to 482q of this title, or under the laws under which they were initiated, as the claimant may desire.

(July 12, 1951, ch. 222, §3, 65 Stat. 119.)
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR 

THE EASTERN DISCTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Richmond Division

Case No. 17-34738-KRH

IN RE: 

ALVIN D. KELLEY

AKA ALVIN DANIEL KELLEY

Debtor Chapter 13 

WITHDRAWAL OF PROOF OF CLAIM (CLAIM 6-1)

COMES NOW, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (the “Creditor”), by and through counsel, and 

hereby withdraws Claim 6-1, filed on November 13, 2017. The claim is no longer included 

in the bankruptcy estate. 

Dated: January 22, 2019 Respectfully Submitted

BWW Law Group, LLC 

_/s/ 

Karl A. Moses, Jr., VSB# 89433 

BWW Law Group, LLC 

8100 Three Chopt Road, Suite 240 

Richmond, VA 23229 

(804) 282-0463

(804) 282-0541 (facsimile)

bankruptcy@bww-law.com

Attorney for the Movant

Karl A. Moses Jr, VSB# 89433 

8100 Three Chopt Road 

Suite 240 

Richmond, VA 23229 

(804) 282-0463

Attorney for the Creditor

Karl Anthony Moses, Jr. 

Case 17-34738-KRH Doc 66 Filed 01/22/19 Entered 01/22/19 12:40:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 22nd day of January, 2019, the following persons 

were or will be served a copy of the foregoing Withdrawal of Proof of Claim electronically via 

the CM/ECF system or by first class mail postage prepaid: 

Carl M. Bates

PO Box 1819

Richmond, VA 23218

Richard C. Pecoraro

1700 Huguenot Rd., Suite B4

Midlothian, VA 23113

Alvin D. Kelley aka Alvin Daniel Kelley

4606 Hero Court

Petersburg, VA 23803

_/s/ 

Karl Anthony Moses, Jr.

Karl Anthony Moses, Jr.

Case 17-34738-KRH Doc 66 Filed 01/22/19 Entered 01/22/19 12:40:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

October 5, 2005

DAILY CVP WATER SUPPLY REPORT

SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 RUN DATE:

RESERVOIR RELEASES IN CUBIC FEET/SECOND

TRINITY

SACRAMENTO

FEATHER

AMERICAN

STANISLAUS

SAN JOAQUIN

LEWISTON

KESWICK

OROVILLE (SWP)

NIMBUS

GOODWIN

FRIANT

RESERVOIR MEDIAN 2004 2005 15

 441

 7,457

 2,500

 1,057

 145

 176

 466

 8,494

 5,500

 2,524

 259

 279

RESERVOIR CAPACITY YR AVG

TRINITY

SHASTA

OROVILLE (SWP)

FOLSOM

NEW MELONES

FED. SAN LUIS

2004 2005

 1,591

 2,183

 1,753

 376

 1,110

 157

 1,890

 3,035

 2,878

 652

 1,933

 403

 15

STORAGE IN MAJOR RESERVOIRS IN THOUSANDS OF ACRE-FEET

MILLERTON 

TOT. N. CVP 

 181 236

 5,417 7,913

2,448

4,552

3,538

977

2,420

966

520

11,360

% OF 15 YR AVG 

RESERVOIR CURRENT

YR AVG

TRINITY

SHASTA

FOLSOM

NEW MELONES

1983

 2,888

 10,794

 6,541

 2,747

 1,415

 5,640

 3,199

 1,576

 15

MILLERTON 2,767 4,705

DRIEST % OF

ACCUMULATED INFLOW FOR WATER YEAR TO DATE IN THOUSANDS OF ACRE-FEET

WY WY 

WETTEST

WY 

YR

AVG

 15

2005 1977

DAM YR

RESERVOIR

CURRENT

TRINITY AT

FISH HATCHERY

SACRAMENTO AT

SHASTA DAM 

AMERICAN AT 

BLUE CANYON

STANISLAUS AT

NEW MELONES

1983

 58.58

 116.63

 105.60

 46.79

 0.00

 0.00

 0.00

 0.00

SAN JOAQUIN AT

HUNTINGTON LK 

 85.00 0.00

DRIEST 

ACCUMULATED PRECIPITATION FOR WATER YEAR TO DATE IN INCHES

WY WY 

WETTEST

WY 

% OF

2005 1977 AVG

AVG

(N YRS)

 225

 2,628

 356

 0

 377

 16.35

 26.44

 18.28

 0.00

 17.60

 37.20

 67.68

 75.19

 41.37

 58.39

 450

 7,027

 2,500

 1,748

 223

 201

 1,591 119

 2,643

 2,121

 524

 1,321

 286

 227

 6,366

 115

 136

 124

 146

 141

 104

 124

 33.00

 1,426

 6,118

 2,797

 1,135

 1,872

 99

 92

 114

 139

 148

 113

 63.85

 65.01

 26.90

 44.46

 106

 116

 154

 131

 43

 48

 30

 27

 30

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

 LAST 

24 HRS 

WY WY

WY WY
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In re Robert Steven Childress

, * Original Mandamus Proceeding

No. 11

- 2 4

- 00 216

- C V * August 15, 2024

* Memorand um Opinion by Trotter, J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and Williams, J. )

This court has considered Robert Steven Childress ’s petition for writ of

mandamus and concludes that the petition should be d ismissed for want of

jurisdiction

. Th erefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the petition for

writ of mandamus is d ismissed

.
### §3554. Order of criminal forfeiture

The court, in imposing a sentence on a defendant who has been found guilty of an offense described in section 1962 of this title or in title II or III of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 shall order, in addition to the sentence that is imposed pursuant to the provisions of section 3551, that the defendant forfeit property to the United States in accordance with the provisions of section 1963 of this title or section 413 of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse and Control Act of 1970.

(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §212(a)(2), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1990.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 91–513, Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1236. Title II of this Act, known as the Controlled Substances Act, is classified principally to subchapter I (§801 et seq.) of chapter 13 of Title 21, Food and Drugs. Title III of this Act, known as the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act, is classified principally to subchapter II (§951 et seq.) of chapter 13 of Title 21. Section 413 of this Act is classified to section 853 of Title 21. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under sections 801 and 951 of Title 21 and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Nov. 1, 1987, and applicable only to offenses committed after the taking effect of this section, see section 235(a)(1) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as a note under section 3551 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 617

 552

 621

 621

 587

 542

 539

 548

 484

 482

 463

 499

 515

 543

 576

 611

 674

 721

 709

 648

 581

 574

 529

 584

 602

 643

 744

 754

 799

 852

 940

 404

 407

 401

 398

 402

 402

 400

 381

 383

 377

 379

 383

 388

 392

 393

 395

 394

 388

 383

 370

 357

 355

 329

 328

 334

 342

 343

 342

 374

 363

 357

 436

 435

 435

 437

 445

 436

 427

 419

 418

 414

 412

 421

 428

 438

 455

 474

 483

 511

 508

 471

 439

 430

 410

 414

 422

 429

 434

 516

 548

 536

 592

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:April 1, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 285

 285

 285

 286

 291

 285

 280

 275

 274

 272

 271

 276

 281

 287

 297

 309

 314

 332

 330

 307

 287

 282

 269

 272

 277

 281

 284

 335

 355

 347

 382

TOTAL 14,073

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
### §2252C. Misleading words or digital images on the Internet

(a) In General.—Whoever knowingly embeds words or digital images into the source code of a website with the intent to deceive a person into viewing material constituting obscenity shall be fined under this title and imprisoned for not more than 10 years.

(b) Minors.—Whoever knowingly embeds words or digital images into the source code of a website with the intent to deceive a minor into viewing material harmful to minors on the Internet shall be fined under this title and imprisoned for not more than 20 years.

(c) Construction.—For the purposes of this section, a word or digital image that clearly indicates the sexual content of the site, such as "sex" or "porn", is not misleading.

(d) Definitions.—As used in this section—

(1) the terms "material that is harmful to minors" and "sex" have the meaning given such terms in section 2252B; and

(2) the term "source code" means the combination of text and other characters comprising the content, both viewable and nonviewable, of a web page, including any website publishing language, programming language, protocol or functional content, as well as any successor languages or protocols.

(Added Pub. L. 109–248, title VII, §703(a), July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 648.)
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nuance
Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles W. Berger, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                       |  |     |  |                                                        
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 8, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Charles W. Berger                                  
|                       |  |     |  | Charles W. Berger President and Chief Executive
Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM FORM 10-KSB FOR PERIOD ENDED 9/30/99 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-KSB FOR PERIOD ENDED
9/30/99
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         315,579
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  277,155
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    160,582
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               762,483
<PP&E>                                       1,320,478
<DEPRECIATION>                                 926,987
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,751,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          273,602
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,689
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,234,471
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,751,762
<SALES>                                        267,391
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,863,738
<CGS>                                          121,126
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  912,989
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               660,590
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,143
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                256,016
<INCOME-TAX>                                    72,140
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            183,876
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 20,040
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   163,836
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 6, 2011

t0829 

# Order

September 6, 2011

142784

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142784 COA: 294987 Wayne CC: 09-013105-FH TIMOTHY BAIN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 20, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned officer of Moldflow Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies
that to his knowledge the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 to which this certification is being
furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item
601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item
601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that
the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

Date: November 6, 2006

                                          /s/ CHRISTOPHER L. GORGONE
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Name:   Christopher L. Gorgone
                                          Title:  Executive Vice President of
                                                  Finance and Chief Financial
                                                  Officer and Treasurer
§ 361.750 When and how can a one-stop partner appeal a one-stop infrastructure amount designated by the State under the State infrastructure funding mechanism? ( a ) The Governor must establish a process, described under sec. 121(h)(2)(E) of WIOA, for a one-stop partner administering a program described in §§ 361.400 through 361.410 to appeal the Governor's determination regarding the one-stop partner's portion of funds to be provided for one-stop infrastructure costs. This appeal process must be described in the Unified State Plan.
( b ) The appeal may be made on the ground that the Governor's determination is inconsistent with proportionate share requirements in § 361.735(a), the cost contribution limitations in § 361.735(b), the cost contribution caps in § 361.738, consistent with the process described in the State Plan.
( c ) The process must ensure prompt resolution of the appeal in order to ensure the funds are distributed in a timely manner, consistent with the requirements of 20 CFR 683.630.
( d ) The one-stop partner must submit an appeal in accordance with State's deadlines for appeals specified in the guidance issued under § 361.705(b)(3), or if the State has not set a deadline, within 21 days from the Governor's determination.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean TDS

1 669 624 643 413

2 632 567 597 385

3 574 511 545 353

4 553 520 537 348

5 571 530 551 357

6 578 539 561 363

7 588 545 568 367

8 581 519 545 353

9 580 505 541 350

10 584 503 552 357

11 584 488 528 342

12 661 487 558 361

13 624 589 600 387

14 596 530 567 366

15 622 499 574 371

16 617 516 582 376

17 632 528 599 386

18 633 537 603 389

19 630 537 601 387

20 634 538 599 386

21 631 574 619 399

22 631 556 611 394

23 638 563 613 395

24 637 590 621 400

25 636 610 627 403

26 641 621 632 407

27 646 620 638 410

28 636 604 615 396

29 640 624 633 407

30 650 631 637 410

Total 17697

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Check 21 

Period: November 2022 Run Date: 12/8/2022
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Kim Boyce, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report (the Report) on Form 10-QSB of the small business issuer;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;  4.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.   The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:November 14, 2007By:/s/Kim BoyceKim Boyce, CEO, President and Director
§ 644.4 What services may a project provide? An Educational Opportunity Centers project may provide the following services: ( a ) Public information campaigns designed to inform the community about opportunities for postsecondary education and training.
( b ) Academic advice and assistance in course selection.
( c ) Assistance in completing college admission and financial aid applications.
( d ) Assistance in preparing for college entrance examinations.
( e ) Education or counseling services designed to improve the financial and economic literacy of participants.
( f ) Guidance on secondary school reentry or entry to a General Educational Development (GED) program or other alternative education program for secondary school dropouts.
( g ) Individualized personal, career, and academic counseling.
( h ) Tutorial services.
( i ) Career workshops and counseling.
( j ) Mentoring programs involving elementary or secondary school teachers, faculty members at institutions of higher education, students, or any combination of these persons.
( k ) Programs and activities described in this section that are specially designed for participants who are limited English proficient, participants from groups that are traditionally underrepresented in postsecondary education, participants who are individuals with disabilities, participants who are homeless children and youth, participants who are foster care youth, or other disconnected participants.
( l ) Other activities designed to meet the purposes of the Educational Opportunity Centers program stated in § 644.1.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-16)
[59 FR 2658, Jan. 18, 1994, as amended at 75 FR 65780, Oct. 26, 2010]