# Date: May 8, 2012

Subject: Recommendations Concerning Residual Risk Remodeling for the Pulp and

Paper Industry

EPA Contract No. EP-D-11-084; Work Assignment No. 0 -03

From: Thomas Holloway

To: John Bradfield, Bill Schrock, Kelley Spence, and Ni ck Swanson

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

I. Background

Under section 112(f)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) is directed to conduct risk assessment s on each source category subject to

maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standa rds and determine if additional or more

stringent standards beyond those originally promulg ated are needed to reduce any residual risk

remaining after promulgation. The EPA is directed t o conduct the section 112(f)(2) residual risk

review 8 years after promulgation of the original s tandards. The national emissions standards for

hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for the pulp and paper industry (40 CFR part 63, subpart S)

were originally promulgated on April 15, 1998. Sub part S amendments that addressed the

residual risk assessment required for the pulp and paper industry were proposed in the Federal

Register on December 27, 2011. Final amendments to subpart S are required to be signed by the

EPA Administrator by July 31, 2012.

Data from a CAA section 114 information collection request (ICR) sent to the pulp and

paper industry were used for the residual risk asse ssment. The second part of the ICR (Part II),

which concluded in June 2011, was targeted towards facilities that are major sources of

hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions, and involv ed an update of pre-populated National

Emissions Inventory (NEI) data spreadsheets (or cre ation of new NEI data sets). The response

rate for Part II of EPA’s ICR was 100 percent, with respondents submitting NEI spreadsheets for

171 major sources.

Substantial quality assurance (QA) efforts were con ducted on the Part II data in order to

create the modeling files needed for the residual r isk assessment. Modeling files were needed for

both the subpart S category (MACT code 1626-1) and the whole facility, so QA efforts focused

on data for all emission sources at pulp and paper facilities. The QA of the inputs to the residual

risk modeling file was documented in a November 11, 2011 memorandum entitled, Inputs to the

Pulp and Paper Industry October 2011 Residual Risk Modeling

. 1



# Using these modeling files, EPA conducted risk asse ssments that provided estimates of

the following:

# 2

• The maximum individual risk (MIR) posed by the HAP emissions from the 171 pulp and

paper mills in the source category, where MIR is de fined as the risk associated with a

lifetime of exposure at the highest concentration;

• The distribution of cancer and non-cancer risks wit hin the exposed populations;

• The total cancer incidence;

• Estimates of the maximum target organ-specific haza rd index (TOSHI) for chronic

exposures to HAP with the potential to cause chroni c non-cancer health effects;

• Worst-case screening estimates of hazard quotient ( HQ) for acute exposures to HAP with

the potential to cause non-cancer health effects; a nd

• An evaluation of the potential for adverse environm ental effects.

The results of these risk assessments were presente d in a December 2011 EPA document

entitled, Draft Residual Risk Assessment for the Pulp & Paper Source Category

. 2



# II. Objective

In the preamble to the December 27, 2011 subpart S proposal, EPA proposed that the

risks from the pulp and paper source category are a cceptable and concluded that the current

subpart S rule protects public health with an ample margin of safety. 3 

# The EPA also solicited

comment on the proposal, asking for any additional data that may help to reduce the uncertainties

inherent in the risk assessments and other analyses

. 4 

# The EPA was specifically interested in

receiving corrections to the mill-specific HAP emis sions data used in the risk modeling, but also

accepted revisions to mill-specific non-HAP emissio ns data, including revised data for criteria

air pollutants (CAP) and total reduced sulfur (TRS)

.

The mill-specific NEI emissions data were available for download on EPA’s Risk and

Technology Review (RTR) web page at: http://www.epa .gov/ttn/atw/rrisk/rtrpg.html; the NEI

data files included detailed information for each H AP emissions release point for each facility

included in the subpart S source category. 4



# Commenters on the subpart S proposal (e.g., industr y, states) were asked to determine

whether any of the NEI data were unrepresentative o r inaccurate and to submit their comments

on the data downloaded from the RTR web page. 4 

# Specifically, commenters were asked to enter

suggested revisions to the NEI data fields appropri ate for that information, gather documentation

for any suggested emissions revisions (e.g., perfor mance test reports, material balance

calculations), and send the downloaded file with su ggested revisions and all accompanying

documentation to the docket for the subpart S amend ments (Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–

2007–0544). 4 

# The NEI data fields that could be revised include d those listed in Table 1 at the

end of this memorandum. 4



# The objective of this memorandum is to document the review of the NEI data revisions

received from the pulp and paper industry, evaluate which revisions could increase or decrease

the risk associated with a particular facility, and recommend whether risk remodeling for the

subpart S category should be conducted for any of t he facilities based on these findings.

III. Review of NEI Data Revisions

An estimated 81 facilities provided NEI data revisi ons, out of 171 major source facilities

in the source category, for a response rate of near ly 50 percent, and 53 of 68 facilities with

# 3

cancer risk at or above 1 in a million provided NEI revisions, for a response rate of nearly 80

percent. Most NEI data revisions were received aft er proposal, but there were some late NEI

data revisions received prior to proposal that were not incorporated into the pre-proposal risk

modeling file, which we have now included with the post-proposal revisions.

The facilities made a variety of revisions to their NEI data, including, but not limited to:

• Deleting emission units (e.g., shutdown units, unit s with emissions collected and emitted

elsewhere, causticizing systems using fresh water/n o pulping condensates, units

consolidated elsewhere in the inventory, fugitive s ources changed to stack sources, paper

machines reconfigured from a single emission point to wet/dry end emission points or

multiple vents);

• Replacing emission units (e.g., consolidated units, stack sources changed from fugitive

sources, reconfigured paper machines);

• Adding emission units omitted from previous invento ry (e.g., wastewater treatment

plant);

• Deleting individual records (e.g., duplicates, zero emissions);

• Correcting source classification codes (SCCs);

• Changing release point IDs;

• Correcting release point type from fugitive to stac k;

• Deleting pollutants (e.g., hexachloroethane [HCE] f rom washers/bleach plants,

chlorinated compounds at unbleached mills, biphenyl from recycle paper machines, oxylene double-counted with total xylenes, o-cresol double-counted with total cresols);

• Adding pollutants omitted from previous inventory;

• Revising routine annual emissions data (e.g., based on updated emission factors/test data,

corrected emissions calculations);

• Deleting/replacing routine annual emissions data wi th updated/corrected data;

• Revising maximum hourly emissions data;

• Revising MACT code;

• Providing stack parameters for newly designated sta ck sources;

• Correcting stack parameters;

• Replacing incorrect fugitive parameters; and

• Correcting latitudes/longitudes.

A. QA of NEI Data Revision Spreadsheets

The first step in our review was to QA the aforemen tioned changes in the individual NEI

data revision spreadsheets received from the pulp a nd paper industry. Table 2 at the end of this

memorandum lists the NEI data fields we reviewed in each spreadsheet and provides some

examples of the type of review we conducted. The r isk inputs memo 1 

# was used as a guide to

ensure that the changes commenters made were consis tent with prior modeling inputs.

We added an “RTI Notes” column at the end of each f acility’s NEI data revisions

spreadsheet that (1) noted our recommendations rega rding the facility’s suggested NEI data

revisions and rationale (e.g., OK to add/delete/rev ise record to correct error, update data, replace

data); and (2) noted our own revisions (e.g., addin g default stack parameters, calculating flow

rates, correcting errors, filling data gaps, adding data from facilities’ previous inventory updates).

# 4

Where we made revisions, we highlighted those sprea dsheet cells in yellow to distinguish them

from the revisions made by the facilities.

B. Completion of Review Checklists

After we had completed our QA of each facility’s NE I data revisions spreadsheet, we

filled out a review checklist for each facility tha t documented whether the NEI data revisions

could be expected to increase or decrease the risk for that facility, to assist in developing our

recommendations whether to remodel for risk for the subpart S category. See Appendix A for a

blank copy of the NEI data revisions review checkli st that was used. The review checklist

includes the following items:

• Risk results from EPA’s December 2011 risk report f or each facility for the subpart S

category and facility-wide, including chronic cance r MIR, chronic non-cancer maximum

hazard index (HI), and acute non-cancer HQ referenc e exposure level (REL); 2 

# for each

facility, we included only those HQ(REL) values abo ve 0.1, unless the highest HQ(REL)

for the facility was below 0.1, in which case we in cluded the highest HQ(REL) value for

that facility;

• Facility information, including mill name, city, st ate, NEI ID, RTI facility ID;

• Format of the NEI data revision provided by the fac ility, including whether the revision

was provided as a spreadsheet or written comment, w hether the revision was submitted

before proposal, and whether the revision was a res ubmittal of a prior inventory;

• Table of changes that may increase risk for subpart S pulp and paper production sources

(MACT code 1626-1), subpart MM chemical recovery so urces (MACT code 1626-2),

and facility-wide sources, including:

o Reductions in stack/fugitive release height, fugiti ve area (length x width), stack

temperature, exit gas velocity, and/or exit gas flo w rate;

o Additions or increases in emissions of key risk dri ver pollutants and other HAP;

o Addition of emission units; and

o Change in release point type from stack to fugitive or from vertical to

horizontal/gooseneck/etc.;

• Table of changes likely to reduce risk for the same aforementioned sources, including

(conversely):

o Increases in stack/fugitive release height, fugitiv e area (length x width), stack

temperature, exit gas velocity, and/or exit gas flo w rate;

o Deletions or reductions in emissions of key risk dr iver pollutants and other HAP;

o Deletion of emission units; and

o Change in release point type from fugitive to stack or from horizontal/gooseneck/

etc. to vertical;

• Table of changes with an unknown effect on risk on the aforementioned sources,

including:

o Changes in latitude and longitude;

o Changes in fugitive angle; and

# 5 o Other changes listed on a site-specific basis (e.g. , change in stack diameter,

receptor location);

• List of other types of changes, including mill name s, IDs, codes, descriptions; and

• Any other notes from RTI pertinent to the review.

We checked off each box in the review checklist tha t applied and also provided some

additional information to assist in our later recom mendations concerning risk remodeling for the

subpart S category. Specifically, we listed on the checklist any of the key HAP risk driver

pollutants whose emissions were increased, reduced, or deleted in the NEI data revision

spreadsheets. Based on our review of the chronic c ancer/non-cancer and acute non-cancer risk

results, we considered the key HAP risk driver poll utants to be acetaldehyde, formaldehyde,

HCE, naphthalene, chloroform, methanol, and metals. We also listed on the checklist the

emission units from which the relevant pollutants w ere emitted. In addition, we listed on the

checklist any emission units that were added or del eted from the spreadsheets and their

associated risk driver pollutants. We also calcula ted the HAP emissions reductions/increases

associated with the aforementioned changes and then calculated the net change in facility HAP

emissions for subpart S sources, subpart MM sources , and facility-wide, as applicable.

C. Risk Remodeling Recommendations

To facilitate our development of recommendations co ncerning residual risk remodeling

for the subpart S processes at each facility, we co nsolidated the information from the review

checklists for the 81 facilities that submitted NEI data revisions into a single summary

spreadsheet, provided as Appendix B at the end of t his memorandum. We added the following

additional columns to the spreadsheet to help us in our recommendations:

• Two columns including information summarized by the pulp and paper industry’s

consultant AECOM, listing the risk drivers for faci lities with chronic cancer risk over 2

in a million, specifically the pollutants considere d risk drivers and the sources from

which the pollutants are emitted (e.g., wastewater, papermaking, pulping); 5



# • One column noting whether facilities submitted comm ents about incorrect receptor

locations at their facilities;

• One column providing our recommendations about whet her to remodel risk for subpart S

processes at each facility (Yes, No, Maybe) and one column listing the reasons why or

why not;

• One column providing the baseline HAP emissions in tons per year (tpy) for subpart S

processes for each facility from the NEI data files on the RTR web page;

• One column providing the estimated net change in HA P emissions in tpy relative to

baseline for subpart S processes for each facility that can be used to support our

recommendations concerning remodeling of risk for s ubpart S processes; and

• One column providing the estimated percent change i n HAP emissions relative to

baseline for subpart S processes for each facility that can also be used to support our

recommendations concerning remodeling of risk for s ubpart S processes.

Where facilities made the types of NEI data revisio ns that could reduce risk, we

attempted to link those changes to the chronic canc er risk driver information from AECOM 5 

# and

# 6

the acute non-cancer risk information from EPA’s De cember 2011 risk report 2 

# by highlighting

the relevant cells in yellow, to directly show wher e the NEI data revisions are expected to reduce

risk.

After populating the summary spreadsheet with the a forementioned information from the

review checklists, AECOM, and EPA risk report, we s orted the spreadsheet by chronic cancer

risk, from highest to lowest. Then, for each facil ity that submitted NEI data revisions, we made

recommendations whether to remodel risk for subpart S processes based on (1) the level of

chronic cancer and acute non-cancer risk from subpa rt S processes at the facility, reported in the

EPA risk report 2 

# ; (2) the NEI data revisions that were made; and (3 ) the net change in HAP

emissions for subpart S processes. The development of our recommendations did not include

chronic non-cancer risk from subpart S sources, sin ce it was low—below a HI of 1—for all

facilities. Table 3 at the end of this memorandum presents our facility-specific recommendations

whether to remodel risk for subpart S processes. O ur recommendations were premised on EPA’s

finding in the December 27, 2011 subpart S proposed amendments that the risks from the pulp

and paper source category, as modeled prior to prop osal, are acceptable. 3 

# Therefore, as long as

the risk for subpart S processes at an individual f acility is not expected to be substantially

increased as a result of the facility’s NEI data re visions, we do not recommend remodeling risk

for the subpart S processes at that facility.

Specifically, for facilities with chronic cancer MI R values above 1 in a million and acute

non-cancer HQ(REL) values above 1, we recommend no risk remodeling of subpart S processes

if the facilities provided NEI data revisions that would be expected to either reduce risk or result

in no significant change to risk for subpart S proc esses. It follows that any facilities with lower

MIR or HQ(REL) values is also not recommended for r isk remodeling.

Only three facilities’ NEI data revisions increased the overall HAP emissions from their

subpart S processes. The net HAP emissions increas e for subpart S processes at two of the

facilities was minimal (approximately 3 tpy at each facility), so any increase in risk was expected

to be minor. While the net HAP emissions increase for subpart S processes at the third facility

was substantial (a twofold increase of 308 tpy), 98 percent of the added HAP emissions can be

attributed to methanol; less than 6 tons of HAP emi ssions can be attributed to the other risk

driver pollutants (e.g., acetaldehyde, formaldehyde ). The chronic cancer MIR values for subpart

S processes at all three facilities were at or belo w 1 in a million, and the highest acute non-cancer

HQ(REL) values for subpart S processes at all three facilities were below 1, so any increase in

risk for these three facilities is not expected to result in a high risk result. Therefore, we do not

recommend risk remodeling for subpart S processes a t these three facilities.

A fourth facility, which consists of three plants—a pulp mill, paper mill, and water

quality center, each with its own NEI ID—had a mini mal HAP emissions increase for its pulp

mill, but the HAP emissions reductions at the water quality center at the facility far exceeded this

small emissions increase; there were no NEI data re visions for the paper mill. Based on these

findings, we do not recommend risk remodeling for t he subpart S processes at this facility. Note:

For facilities that did not provide NEI data revisi ons, we also do not recommend risk remodeling

for subpart S processes because there are no new da ta that would alter the risks modeled prior to

proposal.

# 7

Nine facilities provided stack or fugitive paramete r revisions that could potentially

increase risk for the subpart S category. However, these changes were (1) countered by other

changes that could potentially reduce risk (e.g., a dditional stack/fugitive parameter changes,

HAP emissions reductions, changes to release point type or equipment configuration) or (2) were

not expected to have a significant effect because t he risk estimates for the facilities were very

low (i.e., chronic cancer MIR below 1 in a million and highest acute non-cancer HQ(REL)

below 1) and because there was no increase in HAP r isk driver emissions for the subpart S

processes at these facilities. Therefore, we also do not recommend risk remodeling for the

subpart S processes at these facilities.

In summary, based on EPA’s current cancer and non- cancer risk estimates for the pulp

and paper industry and our review of the NEI data r evisions received from the industry, we do

not recommend risk remodeling for the subpart S cat egory for any of the major source facilities

in this industry.

IV. References

1. Memorandum from Thomas Holloway, Katie Hanks, C orey Gooden, and Matt Hakos,

RTI, to J. Bradfield and B. Schrock, EPA. Inputs to the Pulp and Paper Industry

October 2011 Residual Risk Modeling. November 11, 2011.

2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Draft Residual Risk Assessment for the Pulp &

Paper Source Category. December 2011.

3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air

Pollutants from the Pulp and Paper Industry, Propos ed Rule. 76 FR 81344. December

27, 2011.

4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air

Pollutants from the Pulp and Paper Industry, Propos ed Rule. 76 FR 81349-51.

December 27, 2011.

5. Comment submitted by Paul Noe, Vice President fo r Public Policy, American Forest and

Paper Association (AF&PA). RE: Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2007-0544, National

Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants fro m the Pulp and Paper Industry (76

Federal Register 81328, December 27, 2011). Attachment 1: Review of the HEM3

Modeling Conducted by EPA for the Pulp & Paper Indu stry RTR by David Heinold,

AECOM (February 2012), Table 2. February 27, 2012.

# 8 Table 1. NEI Data Fields for Revision

Data element Definition

Control Measure Are control measures in place? (yes or no).

Control Measure Comment Select control measure from list provided, and briefly describe the control

measure.

Delete Indicate here if the facility or record shou ld be deleted.

Delete Comment Describes the reason for deletion.

Emissions Calculation Method

Code For Revised Emissions Code description of the method used to derive emiss ions. For example,

CEMS, material balance, stack test, etc.

Emissions Process Group Enter the general type of e missions process associated with the specified

emissions point.

Fugitive Angle Enter release angle (clockwise from true North); orientation of the ydimension relative to true North, measured positive for clockwise starting at 0

degrees (maximum 89 degrees).

Fugitive Length Enter dimension of the source in th e east-west (x-) direction, commonly

referred to as length (ft).

Fugitive Width Enter dimension of the source in the north-south (y-) direction, commonly

referred to as width (ft).

Malfunction Emissions Enter total annual emissions due to malfunctions (tpy).

North American Datum Enter datum for latitude/longi tude coordinates (NAD27 or NAD83); if left

blank, NAD83 is assumed.

Process Comment Enter general comments about proces s sources of emissions.

REVISED Address Enter revised physical street addre ss for MACT facility here.

REVISED City Enter revised city name here.

REVISED County Name Enter revised county name here.

REVISED Emissions Release Point

Type Enter revised Emissions Release Point Type here.

REVISED End Date Enter revised End Date here.

REVISED Exit Gas Flow Rate Enter revised Exit Gas F lowrate here (ft3/sec).

REVISED Exit Gas Temperature Enter revised Exit Gas Temperature here (°F).

REVISED Exit Gas Velocity Enter revised Exit Gas Ve locity here (ft/sec).

REVISED Facility Category Code Enter revised Facili ty Category Code here, which indicates whether faci lity is

a major or area source.

REVISED Facility Name Enter revised Facility Name h ere.

REVISED Facility Registry

Identifier Enter revised Facility Registry Identifier here, wh ich is an ID assigned by the

EPA Facility Registry System.

REVISED HAP Emissions

Performance Level Code Enter revised HAP Emissions Performance Level here.

REVISED Latitude Enter revised Latitude here (decim al degrees).

REVISED Longitude Enter revised Longitude here (dec imal degrees).

REVISED MACT Code Enter revised MACT Code here.

REVISED Pollutant Code Enter revised Pollutant Code here.

REVISED Routine Emissions Enter revised routine emi ssions value here (tpy).

REVISED SCC Code Enter revised SCC Code here.

REVISED Stack Diameter Enter revised Stack Diameter here (ft).

REVISED Stack Height Enter revised Stack Height her e (ft).

REVISED Start Date Enter revised Start Date here.

REVISED State Enter revised State here.

REVISED Tribal Code Enter revised Tribal Code here.

REVISED Zip Code Enter revised Zip Code here.

Shutdown Emissions Enter total annual emissions due to shutdown events (tpy).

Stack Comment Enter general comments about emission s release points.

Startup Emissions Enter total annual emissions due to startup events (tpy).

Year Closed Enter date facility stopped operations.

# 9 Table 2. NEI Data Fields Reviewed a



# Data field Example review

SCC Code Determined whether SCC code change was val id, based on type of pulping process

and emission unit description in risk modeling file

. Emission Release Point ID Determined whether revisi ons of release point ID could result in duplicate r ecords.

Emission Release Point

Type Determined whether revision of release point type w as valid, based on stack

parameters provided by facility (e.g., release poin t changed from fugitive to stack, but

the stack diameter was greater than the stack heigh t).

Pollutant Code Generally accepted facilities’ pollu tant codes, pending review of a compilation of NEI

data revisions for all 81 facilities reporting. b 

# Checked for any data gaps. Determined

whether the deletion of a pollutant was valid (e.g. , facility wanted to delete pollutant

that is not emitted, but the original pollutant cod e was incorrect, resulting in the

incorrect pollutant being assigned; so, a change in pollutant code and pollutant fixed

the problem).

Routine Emissions Generally accepted facilities’ ra tionale and revisions of emissions data, pending

review of a compilation of NEI data revisions for a ll 81 facilities reporting. b 

# When

facilities assigned a value of zero to emissions bu t did not mark the record for

deletion, we made a note in the spreadsheet that th e record should be deleted. Also,

for one facility, we included emissions data from t heir pre-proposal inventory

revisions that were not included in any post-propos al revisions.

Max Hourly Emissions Generally accepted the few fac ilities’ rationale and revisions of maximum hourly

emissions data.

MACT Code Determined whether the revised MACT code corresponded to the type of emission

unit identified by SCC code (e.g., lime kiln should be assigned to 1626-2).

Stack Height Reviewed revised stack height values p rovided by industry to ensure that stack height

was always greater than stack diameter for stack em ission points. Added

SCC/MACT code default stack heights when facilities changed release point type

from fugitive to stack but did not revise nationwid e default stack height of 10 feet.

Exit Gas Temperature Added SCC/MACT code default ex it gas temperature values when facilities changed

release point type from fugitive to stack but did n ot revise nationwide default exit gas

temperature of 72°F.

Stack Diameter Added SCC/MACT code default stack di ameter values when facilities changed

release point type from fugitive to stack but did n ot revise nationwide default stack

diameter of 0.003 feet.

Exit Gas Velocity Added SCC/MACT code default stack diameter values when facilities changed

release point type from fugitive to stack but did n ot revise nationwide default exit gas

velocity of 0.0003 feet per second. Where there we re revised values for stack

diameter and flow rate (e.g., from facility and/or SCC/MACT code defaults),

calculated velocity as “flow rate/( π × (diameter/2) 2 

# ].”

Exit Gas Flow Rate Added SCC/MACT code default exit gas flow rate values when facilities changed

release point type from fugitive to stack but did n ot revise nationwide default stack

diameter, exit gas velocity, and exit gas flow rate from their respective national

default values. Where there were revised values fo r stack diameter and exit gas

velocity (e.g., from facility and/or SCC/MACT code defaults), calculated exit gas

flow rate as “velocity × π × (diameter/2) 2 

# .”

Fugitive Length Reviewed fugitive length values to determine whether any revisions were made

relative to the risk modeling file (e.g., to correc t error). Deleted fugitive length values

when facility changed release point type from fugit ive to stack.

Fugitive Width Reviewed fugitive width values to de termine whether any revisions were made

relative to the risk modeling file (e.g., to correc t error). Deleted fugitive width values

when facility changed release point type from fugit ive to stack.

Fugitive Angle Reviewed fugitive angle values to de termine whether any revisions were made

relative to the risk modeling file (e.g., to correc t error). Deleted fugitive angle values

when facility changed release point type from fugit ive to stack.

Latitude Generally accepted facilities’ revision of latitude (e.g., to correct error), pending a

# 10

Data field Example review

more in-depth review similar to the QA conducted pr e-proposal.

Longitude Generally accepted facilities’ revision o f longitude (e.g., to correct error), pending a

more in-depth review similar to the QA conducted pr e-proposal.

a 

# For new/replacement records added by facilities, w e checked the accuracy of all fields in the table.

b 

# Pollutant codes and emission rates will be recheck ed for consistency across all facilities upon compi lation of the

revised nationwide NEI file.11Table 3. Recommendations Concerning Risk RemodelingSurvey NEICompanynameMill cityMillstateSubpart S category riskRemodel?ReasonsCancer MIRChronic non-cancer max HIaAcute noncancer maxHQ(REL)bNEI32869A Domtar PaperCompany LLCHawesville KY1.21E‐050.17 <1 No Emissions reduction/removal of riskdriver pollutants from multiplesources expected to reduce risk forsubpart S categoryNEI18334 GeorgiaPacific Corp.Pennington AL1.04E‐050.20 5.67(formaldehyde)4.91 (methanol)4.66(acetaldehyde)2.91 (chloroform)No Changes in release point type andstack parameters, removal of someemission units, and net emissionsreduction/removal of risk driver/otherpollutants expected to reduce risk forsubpart S categoryNEI40648 SP NewsprintCo.Newberg OR 9.01E-06 0.44 3.17 (chloroform) No No NEI revisions receivedNEI40282 Blue RidgePaper ProductsInc.Canton NC8.98E‐060.29 <1 No Net emissions reduction/removal ofrisk driver/other pollutants expectedto reduce risk for subpart S categoryNEIWI7720116,NEI46739, &NEI42963NewPageCorporationWisconsinRapidsWI NEIWI7720116:8.51E‐06NEI46739:4.00E-07NEI42963:1.56E-07NEIWI7720116:0.41NEI46739:0.05NEI42963:0.00NEIWI7720116:4.29(acetaldehyde)3.43 (methanol)3.12 (chloroform)1.38(formaldehyde)No Net emissions reduction/removal ofrisk driver/other pollutants for entirefacility expected to reduce risk forsubpart S category; large emissionsreduction for higher-riskNEIWI7720116; minimal netemissions increase in emissions forlow-risk NEI46739NEIME0250002 Madison PaperCo.Madison ME7.58E‐060.31 1.57(acetaldehyde)1.32(formaldehyde)No Changes in release point type andstack parameters and net emissionsreduction of risk driver/otherpollutants expected to reduce risk forsubpart S categoryNEI42695 DomtarCorporationNekoosa WI7.42E‐060.29 <1 No Removal of some risk driverpollutants expected to reduce risk forsubpart S categoryNEI41552 PackagingCorp. ofAmericaCounce TN7.14E‐060.36 2.12(acetaldehyde)No Changes in release point type andstack parameters, removal of riskdriver pollutant from one source, and12Survey NEICompanynameMill cityMillstateSubpart S category riskRemodel?ReasonsCancer MIRChronic non-cancer max HIaAcute noncancer maxHQ(REL)bnet emissions reduction of risk driverpollutant expected to reduce risk forsubpart S categoryNEI6057 GraphicPackagingInternational,Inc.West Monroe LA 5.27E-06 0.22 <1 No No NEI revisionsreceivedNEI47091 BuckeyeTechnologiesInc.Perry FL5.22E‐060.16 1.68 (chloroform) No Removal of risk driver pollutant frommultiple sources expected to reducerisk for subpart S categoryNEI40600 GeorgiaPacific Corp.Toledo OR4.94E‐060.15 <1 No Replacement of fugitive records withstack records and emissions reductionof risk driver/other pollutantsexpected to reduce risk for subpart ScategoryNEI46835 WoodlandPulp LLCBaileyville ME 4.86E-06 0.20 15.2(acetaldehyde)1.40 (chloroform)No No NEI revisions receivedNEI43207 AppletonCoated L.L.C.CombinedLocksWI 4.32E-06 0.22 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI13363 SimpsonTacoma KraftCoTacoma WA4.30E‐060.07 4.62(formaldehyde)No Emissions reduction of risk driverpollutants expected to reduce risk forsubpart S categoryNEI41314 InternationalPaper Co.Georgetown SC4.25E‐060.16 <1 No Removal of some emission units andrisk driver/other pollutants frommultiple sources expected to reducerisk for subpart S categoryNEI42211 GeorgiaPacific Corp.Big Island VA4.25E‐060.20 1.29(acetaldehyde)No No revisions except minor changes tolat/longs and fugitive angles, so riskfor subpart S category expected to beunchangedNEI7104 Appleton RoaringSpringPA4.09E‐060.07 <1 No Changes to stack heights expected toreduce risk for subpart S category13Survey NEICompanynameMill cityMillstateSubpart S category riskRemodel?ReasonsCancer MIRChronic non-cancer max HIaAcute noncancer maxHQ(REL)bNEI40686 DomtarCorporationJohnsonburg PA3.85E‐060.07 <1 No Removal of some risk driver/otherpollutants from multiple sourcesexpected to reduce risk for subpart ScategoryNEI33135 &NEI706NewPageCorporationLuke MD NEI33135:3.77E‐06NEI706:4.65E-07NEI33135:0.14NEI706:0.01<1 No Changes in release point type andstack parameters, removal ofemission unit, and emissionsreduction of risk driver pollutantexpected to reduce risk for subpart ScategoryNEI41599 Domtar PaperCompany LLCKingsport TN3.62E‐060.14 1.09(acetaldehyde)No Net emissions reduction/removal ofrisk driver/other pollutants frommultiple sources expected to reducerisk for subpart S categoryNEI8178 GeorgiaPacific Corp.Rincon GA3.34E‐060.06 <1 No Net emissions reduction/removal ofrisk driver/other pollutants frommultiple sources expected to reducerisk for subpart S categoryNEI8196 GeorgiaPacific Corp.Brunswick GA3.27E‐060.14 1.98(acetaldehyde)No Change in release point type andstack parameters and emissionsreduction of risk driver/otherpollutants expected to reduce risk forsubpart S categoryNEI6450 MeadWestvacoEvadale TX3.25E‐060.09 1.20(acetaldehyde)1.03 (chloroform)No Change in fugitive parameters andnet emissions reduction of risk driverpollutants expected to reduce risk forsubpart S categoryNEI26495 TIN Inc., dbaTemple-InlandRome GA3.18E‐060.09 <1 No No revisions except suggested changein receptor location, so risk forsubpart S category expected to beunchangedNEI42357 Port TownsendPaper Corp.PortTownsendWA 3.10E-06 0.18 <1 No Change in release temperature andemissions reduction of risk driverpollutant expected to reduce risk forsubpart S category14Survey NEICompanynameMill cityMillstateSubpart S category riskRemodel?ReasonsCancer MIRChronic non-cancer max HIaAcute noncancer maxHQ(REL)bNEI18660 DomtarIndustriesAshdown AR3.04E‐060.08 <1 No Emissions reduction/removal of riskdriver pollutants from multiplesources expected to reduce risk forsubpart S categoryNEIIL0215971 AhlstromFiltration LLCTaylorville IL 3.00E-06 0.15 <1 No No NEI revisionsreceivedNEI45182 InternationalPaper Co.Springfield OR2.80E‐060.05 <1 No Emissions reduction of riskdriver/other pollutants expected toreduce risk for subpart S categoryNEI47104 KapStone RoanokeRapidsNC2.73E‐060.12 9.32(acetaldehyde)1.48(formaldehyde)No Changes in release point type andstack parameters expected to reducerisk for subpart S categoryNEI12407 Verso PaperCorp.Sartell MN2.72E‐060.09 <1 No Removal of emission unit expected toreduce risk for subpart S categoryNEI40247 InternationalPaper Co.Riegelwood NC2.69E‐060.09 <1 No Removal of some emission units andemissions reduction/removal of riskdriver/other pollutants expected toreduce risk for subpart S categoryNEI759 MeadWestvaco Covington VA2.62E‐060.08 <1 No Removal of risk driver pollutantexpected to reduce risk for subpart ScategoryNEI8560 InternationalPaper Co.Prattville AL2.58E‐060.10 <1 No Removal of some emission unitsexpected to reduce risk for subpart ScategoryNEI42482 GeorgiaPacific Corp.Green Bay WI2.46E‐060.03 <1 No Net emissions reduction of risk driverpollutant expected to reduce risk forsubpart S categoryNEIVA00022 Greif Inc. Amherst VA 2.32E-06 0.10 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI34030 UPM, BlandinPaper Co.Grand Rapids MN2.30E‐060.04 <1 No Change in paper machineconfiguration (to include wet/dryend) and change in stack parameterexpected to reduce risk for subpart S15Survey NEICompanynameMill cityMillstateSubpart S category riskRemodel?ReasonsCancer MIRChronic non-cancer max HIaAcute noncancer maxHQ(REL)bcategoryNEI8278 Rock-Tenn Co. Panama City FL 2.28E-06 0.07<1 No Changes in release point type andstack parameters and removal of riskdriver/other pollutants from multiplesources expected to reduce risk forsubpart S categoryNEI11610 Rock-Tenn Co. Cincinnati OH 2.27E-06 0.05<1 No Changes to release point type andparameters expected to reduce riskfor subpart S categoryNEI6261 Verso PaperCorp.Jay ME2.22E‐060.12 <1 No Emissions reduction of HAPdriver/other pollutants expected toreduce risk for subpart S categoryNEI43472 SonocoProducts Co.Hartsville SC 2.19E-06 0.11 1.32(acetaldehyde)No No NEI revisions receivedNEI33883 NewPageCorporationEscanaba MI2.04E‐060.12 <1 No Emissions reduction of HAP driverpollutants expected to reduce risk forsubpart S categoryNEI8186 InternationalPaper Co.Savannah GA2.00E‐060.03 1.57(formaldehyde))No Removal of some emission units anddmissions reduction of HAP driverpollutants expected to reduce risk forsubpart S categoryNEI26476 WeyerhaeuserCo.PortWentworthGA 1.91E-06 0.10 1.09(acetaldehyde)No No NEI revisions receivedNEI41565 AbitibiBowaterInc.Calhoun TN 1.89E-06 0.13 1.27 (chloroform) No No NEI revisions receivedNEI40738 Proctor &Gamble PaperProducts Co.Mehoopany PA 1.86E-06 0.06 <1 No Removal of some risk driverpollutants expected to reduce risk forsubpart S categoryNEI11251 InternationalPaper Co.Valliant OK 1.84E-06 0.06 <1 No Changes in stack/fugitive parametersand removal of some emission unitsexpected to reduce risk for subpart Scategory16Survey NEICompanynameMill cityMillstateSubpart S category riskRemodel?ReasonsCancer MIRChronic non-cancer max HIaAcute noncancer maxHQ(REL)bNEI11172 GeorgiaPacific Corp.Monticello MS 1.71E-06 0.06 <1 No Emissions reduction of risk driverpollutant expected to reduce risk forsubpart S categoryNEI54342 GeorgiaPacific Corp.Crossett AR 1.68E-06 0.06 <1 No Changes in releasepoint type andstack parameters expected to reducerisk for subpart S categoryNEI26581 ClearwaterPaper Corp.Lewiston ID 1.49E-06 0.03 <1 No Removal of risk driver pollutantexpected to reduce risk for subpart ScategoryNEI34066 GeorgiaPacific Corp.New Augusta MS 1.44E-06 0.04 <1 No Change in fugitive parameters andremoval of risk driver pollutantexpected to reduce risk for subpart ScategoryNEI11367 AhlstromFiltration LLCMadisonville KY 1.42E-06 0.16 2.07(formaldehyde)1.18 (methanol)No No NEI revisions receivedNEI18658 EvergreenPackagingPine Bluff AR 1.39E-06 0.22 2.9 (chloroform) No Emissions reduction/removal of riskdriver/other pollutants expected toreduce risk for subpart S categoryNEI7181 Glatfelter Spring Grove PA 1.35E-06 0.05 <1No Removal of risk driver pollutant frommultiple sources expected to reducerisk for subpart S categoryNEI34070 InternationalPaper Co.Redwood MS 1.32E-06 0.04 <1 No Change in paper machineconfiguration (to include wet/dryend) and stack parameters, removalof some emission units, and netemissions reduction expected toreduce risk for subpart S categoryNEI13340 Pope & TalbotInc.Halsey OR 1.29E-06 0.14 4.67(formaldehyde)2.57(acetaldehyde)1.58 (methanol)No No NEI revisions receivedNEI26526 Rayonier Inc. Jesup GA 1.28E-06 0.13 <1 NoNo NEI revisions received17Survey NEICompanynameMill cityMillstateSubpart S category riskRemodel?ReasonsCancer MIRChronic non-cancer max HIaAcute noncancer maxHQ(REL)bNEI54400 Domtar PaperCompany LLCRothschild WI 1.18E-06 0.04 <1 No Emissions reduction of risk driverpollutants expected to reduce risk forsubpart S categoryNEI8265 GeorgiaPacific Corp.Palatka FL 1.16E-06 0.03 <1 No Removal of risk driver/otherpollutants expected to reduce risk forsubpart S categoryNEI42341B North PacificPaper Corp.(Norpac)Longview WA 1.15E-06 0.03 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI33025 orNEW71411InternationalPaper Co.Campti LA 1.10E-06 0.04 <1 No Removal of some emission unitsexpected to reduce risk for subpart ScategoryNEI33023 Rock-Tenn Co. Hodge LA 1.10E-06 0.03 <1 NoChange in release point type andstack parameters and net emissionsreductions/removal of biphenyl, ocresol, chloroform, and otherchlorinated HAPs expected to reducerisk for subpart S categoryNEI46814 TIN Inc., dbaTemple-InlandBogalusa LA 1.10E-06 0.03 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI6273 NewPageCorporationRumford ME 1.09E-06 0.04 <1 No Minimal net emissions increase forsubpart S category, so any increase inrisk for subpart S category expectedto be minor; also, cancer MIR forsubpart S category is ~1E-6, and noncancer HI and HQ(REL)<<1, so anyincrease in risk is not expected toresult in a high risk resultNEI46599 GeorgiaPacific Corp.Camas WA 1.05E-06 0.03 <1 No Changes in release point type andstack parameters and emissionsreductions of risk driver/otherpollutants expected to reduce risk forsubpart S categoryNEI8619 International Pine Hill AL 1.04E-06 0.04 <1No Removal of some emission units18Survey NEICompanynameMill cityMillstateSubpart S category riskRemodel?ReasonsCancer MIRChronic non-cancer max HIaAcute noncancer maxHQ(REL)bPaper Co.expected to reduce risk for subpart ScategoryNEI42254 Rock-Tenn Co. West Point VA 1.02E-06 0.05<1 No Changes in release point type andstack parameters and removal ofbiphenyl, o-cresol, and o-xylene frommultiple sources expected to reducerisk for subpart S categoryNEI47074 Domtar PaperCompany LLCBennettsville SC 1.02E-06 0.03 <1 No Changes in release point type andstack parameters and replacement offugitive records with lower-emittingstack records expected to reduce riskfor subpart S categoryNEI26491 GeorgiaPacific Corp.Cedar Springs GA 9.95E-07 0.04 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI8261 Rock-Tenn Co. FernandinaBeachFL 9.31E-07 0.03 <1 No Removal of biphenyl, o-cresol, andchlorinated HAPs from multiplesources expected to reduce risk forsubpart S categoryNEI26309 InternationalPaper Co.Cantonment FL 9.23E-07 0.04 <1 No Change in fugitive parameters andremoval of risk driver pollutantexpected to reduce risk for subpart ScategoryNEI45206 WeyerhaeuserCo.Vanceboro NC 8.85E-07 0.01 <1 No Removal of risk driver pollutant frommultiple sources expected to reducerisk for subpart S categoryNEI41252 KapStone NorthCharlestonSC 8.85E-07 0.02 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI7559 Boise Inc. DeRidder LA 8.80E-07 0.04 <1 NoNo NEI revisions receivedNEI33013 InternationalPaper Co.Mansfield LA 8.44E-07 0.03 <1 No Removal of some emission unitsexpected to reduce risk for subpart ScategoryNEI11461 Rock-Tenn Co. Coshocton OH 8.18E-07 0.04 <1 No Removal of biphenyl from multiplesources expected to reduce risk for19Survey NEICompanynameMill cityMillstateSubpart S category riskRemodel?ReasonsCancer MIRChronic non-cancer max HIaAcute noncancer maxHQ(REL)bsubpart S categoryNEI33945 PackagingCorp. ofAmericaFiler City MI 8.16E-07 0.04 <1 No Emissions reductions of riskdriver/other pollutants expected toreduce risk for subpart S categoryNEI40554 GeorgiaPacific Corp.Clatskanie OR 8.00E-07 0.01 <1 No Changes to release point type andstack parameters expected to reducerisk for subpart S categoryNEI26504 PackagingCorp. ofAmericaClyattville GA 7.94E-07 0.03 <1 No No revisions tosubpart S sources, sorisk for subpart S category expectedto be unchangedNEI18335 InternationalPaper Co.Selma AL 7.69E-07 0.05 <1 No Removal of some emission units andrisk driver pollutant expected toreduce risk for subpart S categoryNEI11338 NewPageCorporationWickliffe KY 7.44E-07 0.03 <1 No No revisions to subpart S sources, sorisk for subpart S category expectedto be unchangedNEI46852 Green BayPackaging Inc.Morrilton AR 7.35E-07 0.04 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI18390 AbitibiBowaterInc.Coosa Pines AL 6.85E-07 0.02 <1 No No NEI revisionsreceivedNEI23 HalltownPaperboard Co.Halltown WV 6.53E-07 0.03 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI42341A WeyerhaeuserCo.Longview WA 6.47E-07 0.07 4.03 (chloroform) No Netemissions reduction of risk driverpollutant expected to reduce risk forsubpart S categoryNEI46817 GeorgiaPacific Corp.Zachary LA 6.43E-07 0.02 1.03(acetaldehyde)No Removal of risk driver pollutantexpected to reduce risk for subpart ScategoryNEI47077 AbitibiBowaterInc.Catawba SC 6.42E-07 0.04 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI26471 GraphicPackagingMacon GA 6.28E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI revisions received20Survey NEICompanynameMill cityMillstateSubpart S category riskRemodel?ReasonsCancer MIRChronic non-cancer max HIaAcute noncancer maxHQ(REL)bInternational,Inc.NEI33103 Red ShieldEnvironmentalOld Town ME 5.54E-07 0.03 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI42689 Wausau Paper Mosinee WI 5.50E-07 0.10 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI46866 TIN Inc., dbaTemple-InlandWaverly TN 5.40E-07 0.03 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI42486 Green BayPackaging Inc.Green Bay WI 5.12E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI6175 Hollingsworth& Vose Co.West Groton MA 5.08E-07 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisionsreceivedNEI26382 Rayonier Inc. FernandinaBeachFL 5.05E-07 0.02 1.10 (chloroform) No No NEI revisions receivedNEI42329 Nippon PaperIndustries USACo., Ltd.Port Angeles WA 5.05E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI42338 LongviewFibre Co.Longview WA 5.02E-07 0.03 1.46(formaldehyde)No Emissions reductions of riskdriver/other pollutants expected toreduce risk for subpart S categoryNEI46931 MeadWestvaco Cottonton AL 4.77E-07 0.02 <1No No NEI revisions receivedNEI9201 Domtar PaperCompany LLCPlymouth NC 4.73E-07 0.02 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI41628 InternationalPaper Co.Queen City TX 4.52E-07 0.03 <1 No Removal of some emission units andrisk driver pollutant expected toreduce risk for subpart S categoryNEI12411 Boise Inc. InternationalFallsMN 4.44E-07 0.02 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI18338 GeorgiaPacific Corp.Brewton AL 4.31E-07 0.01 <1 No Large net emissionsincrease forsubpart S category; however, 98% ofthe added emissions is methanol(only 5.7 tons attributed to other risk21Survey NEICompanynameMill cityMillstateSubpart S category riskRemodel?ReasonsCancer MIRChronic non-cancer max HIaAcute noncancer maxHQ(REL)bdriver pollutants); also cancer MIRfor subpart S category is <<1E-6, andnon-cancer HI and HQ(REL)<1, soany increase in risk is not expected toresult in a high risk resultNEI18357 InternationalPaper Co.Courtland AL 4.29E-07 0.01 <1 No Removal of risk driver pollutantexpected to reduce risk for subpart ScategoryNEI26514 InternationalPaper Co.Augusta GA 4.17E-07 0.02 <1 No Changes in fugitiveparameters andremoval of some emission units andrisk driver pollutant expected toreduce risk for subpart S categoryNEI34064 WeyerhaeuserCo.Columbus MS 3.90E-07 0.04 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI12492 TIN Inc., dbaTemple-InlandOrange TX 3.83E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI33118 Sappi FinePaper NorthAmericaSkowhegan ME 3.83E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI18657 Delta NaturalKraftPine Bluff AR 3.70E-07 0.01 8.54 (1,2-dimethoxyethane)2.75(formaldehyde)No No NEI revisions receivedNEIMA10626 Onyx SpecialtyPapersSouth Lee MA 3.62E-07 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI18347 Rock-Tenn Co. Stevenson AL 3.57E-07 0.02 1.00(acetaldehyde)No Changes in fugitive parameters andremoval of biphenyl and chlorinatedHAPs from multiple sources expectedto reduce risk for subpart S categoryNEI208 Bear IslandPaper Co.,LLCAshland VA 3.54E-07 0.02 4.16 (chloroform) No No NEI revisions received22Survey NEICompanynameMill cityMillstateSubpart S category riskRemodel?ReasonsCancer MIRChronic non-cancer max HIaAcute noncancer maxHQ(REL)bNEI46760 InternationalPaper Co.Eastover SC 3.49E-07 0.07 <1 No Removal of some emission units andrisk driver pollutant expected toreduce risk for subpart S categoryNEI43202 Wausau Paper Rhinelander WI 3.35E-07 0.01<1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI8601 Boise Inc. Jackson AL 2.93E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI18373 Alabama RiverCellulosePerdue Hill AL 2.92E-07 0.01 1.53(acetaldehyde)No Emissions reduction of risk driverpollutant expected to reduce risk forsubpart S categoryNEI33887 Verso PaperCorp.Quinnesec MI 2.88E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI42317 Rock-Tenn Co. Hopewell VA 2.83E-07 0.01 <1No Changes in release point type andstack parameters and removal of oxylene and chlorinated HAPs frommultiple sources expected to reducerisk for subpart S categoryNEI26487 Proctor &Gamble PaperProducts Co.Albany GA 2.79E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI45474 Rock-Tenn Co. Demopolis AL 2.77E-07 0.11 1.93 (chlorine) No Removal of emission unit and riskdriver/other pollutants from multiplesources expected to reduce risk forsubpart S categoryNEI42710 ThilmanyPapers, LLCKaukauna WI 2.73E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI8122 AugustaNewsprint Co.Augusta GA 2.62E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI42730 Fraser PapersInc.Park Falls WI 2.40E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI revisionsreceived23Survey NEICompanynameMill cityMillstateSubpart S category riskRemodel?ReasonsCancer MIRChronic non-cancer max HIaAcute noncancer maxHQ(REL)bNEIWI4050324 GeorgiaPacific Corp.Green Bay WI 2.18E-07 0.14 <1 No Small net emissions increase forsubpart S category; however, theadded pollutant (4.8 tons) is vinylacetate (not risk driver), while thereduced pollutant (1.8 tons) isacetaldehyde (risk driver); alsocancer MIR for subpart S category is<<1E-6, and non-cancer HI andHQ(REL)<<1, so any increase in riskis not expected to result in a high riskresultNEI33981 Domtar PaperCompany LLCPort Huron MI 2.13E-07 0.01 <1 No No revisions to subpart S sources, sorisk for subpart S category expectedto be unchangedNEI42410 Boise Inc. Wallula WA 1.93E-07 0.01 <1 NoNo NEI revisions receivedNEIMN14904 NewPageCorporationDuluth MN 1.89E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI39968 Finch PaperLLCGlens Falls NY 1.86E-07 0.14 <1 No No NEI revisionsreceivedNEI13216 Catalyst Paper Snowflake AZ 1.76E-07 0.00<1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI12368 Sappi FinePaper NorthAmericaCloquet MN 1.73E-07 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI26506 WeyerhaeuserCo.Oglethorpe GA 1.59E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI revisionsreceivedNEI11108 AbitibiBowaterInc.Grenada MS 1.57E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI42495 ThilmanyPapers, LLCDe Pere WI 1.51E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI12980 GeorgiaPacific Corp.Muskogee OK 1.49E-07 0.01 <1 No Minor changes in stack parametersfor two release points expected tohave minimal impact on risk forsubpart S category24Survey NEICompanynameMill cityMillstateSubpart S category riskRemodel?ReasonsCancer MIRChronic non-cancer max HIaAcute noncancer maxHQ(REL)bNEI33104 Lincoln Paperand TissueLincoln ME 1.48E-07 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI42800 ShawanoSpecialtyPapersShawano WI 1.47E-07 0.01 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI42690 Wausau Paper Brokaw WI 1.45E-07 0.01 <1 NoNo NEI revisions receivedNEI18652 ClearwaterPaper Corp.McGehee AR 1.29E-07 0.05 <1 No No revisions to subpart S sources, sorisk for subpart S category expectedto be unchangedNEI35908 InternationalPaper Co.Ticonderoga NY 1.17E-07 0.01 <1 No Removal of someemission units andrisk driver pollutant expected toreduce risk for subpart S categoryNEIWI7500086& NEIWIT$8597NewPageCorporationStevens Point WI NEIWI7500086:1.13E-07NEIWIT$8597:0.00E+00NEIWI7500086:0.01NEIWIT$8597:0.00<1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEIWI0793640 WisconsinPaperboardCorp.Milwaukee WI 1.12E-07 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI7933 Rock-Tenn Co. Florence SC 1.08E-07 0.00 <1No Changes in release point type andstack parameters and removal of ocresol, o-xylene, chloroform, andother chlorinated HAPs from multiplesources expected to reduce risk forsubpart S categoryNEI8177 InterstatePaper L.L.C.Riceboro GA 1.07E-07 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI6284 Verso PaperCorp.Bucksport ME 1.05E-07 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI46750 PackagingCorp. ofAmericaTomahawk WI 9.83E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisions received25Survey NEICompanynameMill cityMillstateSubpart S category riskRemodel?ReasonsCancer MIRChronic non-cancer max HIaAcute noncancer maxHQ(REL)bNEI34020 Wausau Paper Brainerd MN 9.79E-08 0.00 <1No No NEI revisions receivedNEI11602 GraphicPackagingInternational,Inc.Middletown OH 7.40E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisionsreceivedNEIPA1013489 Newman &Co., Inc.Philadelphia PA 7.36E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI2INT16350 Temple-Inland Cayuga IN 6.75E-08 0.00<1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEITN1050093 KimberlyClarkWorldwide,Inc.Loudon TN 6.34E-08 0.01 5.24 (chloroform) No No NEIrevisions receivedNEI11645 Appleton WestCarrolltonOH 6.13E-08 0.07 1.90 (chloroform) No No NEI revisions receivedNEI11600 Smart PapersL.L.C.Hamilton OH 5.51E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI36019 KnowltonTechnologies,LLCWatertown NY 5.18E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEICT3102 CascadesBoxboardVersailles CT 5.01E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisionsreceivedNEIWI4710355 SCA TissueNorthAmerica,L.L.C.Menasha WI 4.43E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI42961 NewPageCorporationWisconsinRapidsWI 4.32E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEW73505 RepublicPaperboard Co.Lawton OK 4.22E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI40488 Glatfelter Chillicothe OH 3.76E-08 0.00 <1No No NEI revisions receivedNEIGAT$3911 SP Newsprint East Dublin GA 3.39E-08 0.02 <1 No No NEI revisions received26Survey NEICompanynameMill cityMillstateSubpart S category riskRemodel?ReasonsCancer MIRChronic non-cancer max HIaAcute noncancer maxHQ(REL)bCo.NEI33866 Neenah Paper,Inc.Munising MI 2.45E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI7106 AmericanEagle PaperMills Inc.Tyrone PA 1.40E-08 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI33950 MenomineePaper Co./Cellu TissueMenominee MI 8.45E-09 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI40720 PaperWorksIndustries, Inc.Philadelphia PA 7.58E-09 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI26304 Rock-Tenn Co. Jacksonville FL 4.13E-09 0.00 <1 No Removal of biphenyl, o-xylene,methylene chloride, and otherchlorinated HAP from multiplesources expected to reduce risk forsubpart S categoryNEINY5532600 Hollingsworth& Vose Co.Greenwich NY 1.44E-09 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI40553 Boise Inc. St Helens OR 4.20E-10 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEINY5533400 Hollingsworth& Vose Co.Easton NY 3.12E-10 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI2WAT18798 PonderayNewsprint Co.Usk WA 0.00E+00 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI42385 KimberlyClarkWorldwide,Inc.Everett WA 0.00E+00 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEIGAT$3909 Hollingsworth& Vose Co.Hawkinsville GA 0.00E+00 0.00 <1 No No NEI revisions receivedNEI33072 Sappi FinePaper NorthAmericaWestbrook ME -- -- -- No No HAP data for subpart Scategoryto model27Survey NEICompanynameMill cityMillstateSubpart S category riskRemodel?ReasonsCancer MIRChronic non-cancer max HIaAcute noncancer maxHQ(REL)bNEI33986 ManistiquePapers Inc.Manistique MI -- -- -- No No HAP data for subpart Scategoryto modelNEIMA131179 Hollingsworth& Vose Co.East Walpole MA -- -- -- No No HAP data for subpartS categoryto modelNEIWA0270002 Grays HarborPaper, LLCHoquiam WA -- -- -- No Not modeledaChronic non-cancer max HI results are low (<1) forall mills, so HI values were not considered in therisk remodeling evaluation. Note: HI values of 0.00 simply mean that HI isless than 0.005 (i.e., cannot be rounded to 0.01).bAcute non-cancer HQ(REL) results are available formultiple pollutants. Note: Table only includes specific HQ(REL) values above 1.

# Appendix A. NEI Data Revisions Review Sheet

A-1 Source category Facility-Wide

Chronic cancer MIR _______ _______

Chronic non-cancer max HI _______ _______

Acute non-cancer max HQ REL _______ _______

NEI code: ____________ RTI code: ______

Mill name (city and state): _______________________

____________________________

Format of NEI revision (check one):

__Spreadsheet __Resubmittal of prior inventory in its entirety

__Written comment __Other (specify) ____________

___ __Submitted before proposal

**Changes That May Increase Risk (check all that appl y)** 

**Type of change in inventory revision Subpart S** 

**(1626-1 Sources) Subpart MM** 

**(1626-2 Sources) Facility** 

****

**wide**

**sources**

Reduced stack/fugitive release height

Reduced fugitive area (l x w)

Increased emissions of key risk driver pollutants

(> 1 tpy increase)*

Increased emission s of other HAP less likely to

be risk drivers (> 10 tpy increase)

Reduced stack gas temperature

Reduced stack gas velocity or flow

Added rows with add’l HAP emission unit(s)

Added rows with add’l HAPs (particularly risk

drivers) for previously reported emission units*

Changed emission release point type from stack

to fugitive, vertical to horizontal, gooseneck, etc

*acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, hexachloroethane, naph thalene, chloroform, methanol, metals

**Changes Likely to Reduce Risk (check all that apply )** 

**Type of change in inventory revision Subpart S** 

**(1626-1 Sources) Subpart MM** 

**(1626-2 Sources) Facility** 

****

**wide**

**sources**

Increased stack/fugitive release height

Increased fugitive area (l x w)

Reduced emissions of key risk driver pollutants

(> 1 tpy decrease)*

Reduced emissions of other HAP less likely to be

risk drivers (> 10 tpy decrease)

Increased stack gas temperature

Increased stack gas velocity or flow

Deleted rows of HAP emission unit(s)

Deleted rows of HAPs (particularly risk drivers)

for previously reported emission units*

# Appendix A. NEI Data Revisions Review Sheet

A-2 **Type of change in inventory revision Subpart S** 

**(1626-1 Sources) Subpart MM** 

**(1626-2 Sources) Facility** 

****

**wide**

**sources**

Changed emission release point type from

fugitive to stack, horizontal/gooseneck/etc. to

vertical

*acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, hexachloroethane, naph thalene, chloroform, methanol, metals

**Changes with Unknown Affect on Risk**

**Type of change in inventory revision Subpart S** 

**(1626-1 Sources) Subpart MM** 

**(1626-2 Sources) Facility** 

****

**wide**

**sources**

Changes in lat/long coordinates

Change in fugitive angle

**Other types of changes (list):**

__Mill name

__NEI ID

__SIC code

__SCCs

__Emission unit description

__Emission unit ID

__Process ID

__Emission release point ID

__MACT code

__Control measure code/description

**Notes: Appendix B. Summary of Review of NEI Data Revisions** **Cancer MIR (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Cancer risk driver (% of** **risk) (Source: AECOM** **5 )** **Cancer risk driver (source group)** **(Source: AECOM 5** **) Chronic non** **cancer max HI (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Acute non-cancer max** **HQ(REL) (Source: EPA risk report** **2 )** NEI32869A 109 0177 Domtar Paper CompanyLLCHawesville KY Yes Yes 1.21E‐05 HCE (80%) Kraft Pulp Storage 0.17 0.14 (chloroform)0.11 (formaldehyde)NEI18334 186 0197 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Pennington AL Yes Yes 1.04E‐05 Acetaldehyde (18%),Formaldehyde (17%),Carbon tetrachloride (14%),Naphthalene (13%)Kraft Pulping: EvaporatorLVHC, Kraft Pulping: BLTanks HVLC, Wastewater(Kraft), Kraft Pulping:Washing, Kraft Pulping:Decker, Bleaching: Kraft0.20 5.67 (formaldehyde)4.91 (methanol)4.66 (acetaldehyde)2.91 (chloroform)0.608 (carbontetrachloride)0.18 (phenol)NEI40648 410 SP Newsprint Co. Newberg OR No No 9.01E‐06 Acetaldehyde (70%),Naphthalene (18%)Paper Stock Prep 0.44 3.17 (chloroform)0.685 (acetaldehyde)NEI40282 206 0174 Blue Ridge Paper ProductsInc.Canton NC Yes Yes 8.98E‐06 Acetaldehyde (44%),Formaldehyde (32%)Papermaking, Kraft Pulping:O2 delignification HVLC0.29 0.344 (acetaldehyde)0.269 (formaldehyde)NEIWI7720116,NEI46739, &NEI42963154 0182 NewPage Corporation WisconsinRapidsWI Yes Yes NEIWI7720116:8.51E‐06NEI46739:4.00E‐07NEI42963:1.56E‐07Acetaldehyde (79%),Formaldehyde (12%)Wastewater (Kraft) NEIWI7720116:0.41NEI46739:0.05NEI42963:0.00NEIWI7720116:4.29 (acetaldehyde)3.43 (methanol)3.12 (chloroform)1.38 (formaldehyde)NEI46739:0.109 (formaldehyde)NEI42963:0.0136 (formaldehyde)NEIME0250002 363 0205 Madison Paper Co. Madison ME Yes Yes 7.58E‐06 Naphthalene (60%),Acetaldehyde (23%)Mechanical Pulping 0.31 1.57 (acetaldehyde)1.32 (formaldehyde)0.202 (phenol)NEI42695 617 0180 Domtar Corporation Nekoosa WI Yes Yes 7.42E‐06 Beryllium compounds(84%)Kraft Pulping: DigesterLVHC0.29 0.0701 (acetaldehyde)**Survey NEI NEI revision** **reviewed (by RTI)** **Company name NEI revision** **received (by RTI)** **Mill state Mill city** **Subpart S category risk RTI code** **Comment no.** B‐1**Cancer MIR (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Cancer risk driver (% of** **risk) (Source: AECOM** **5 )** **Cancer risk driver (source group)** **(Source: AECOM 5** **) Chronic non** **cancer max HI (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Acute non-cancer max** **HQ(REL) (Source: EPA risk report** **2 )** **Survey NEI NEI revision** **reviewed (by RTI)** **Company name NEI revision** **received (by RTI)** **Mill state Mill city** **Subpart S category risk RTI code** **Comment no.** NEI41552 142 Packaging Corp. of America Counce TN Yes Yes 7.14E‐06 Acetaldehyde (98%) Wastewater (Kraft) 0.36 2.12 (acetaldehyde)NEI6057 181 Graphic PackagingInternational, Inc.West Monroe LA No No 5.27E‐06 Acetaldehyde (59%),Naphthalene (21%)Papermaking, Paper StockPrep0.22 0.305 (acetaldehyde)0.293 (formaldehyde)0.203 (methanol)0.135 (chloroform)NEI47091 606 Buckeye Technologies Inc. Perry FL Yes Yes 5.22E‐06 HCE (78%) Kraft Pulping: Washing,Bleaching: Kraft0.16 1.68 (chloroform)0.888 (acetaldehyde)0.166 (methanol)NEI40600 188 0209 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Toledo OR Yes Yes 4.94E‐06 Acetaldehyde (33%),Formaldehyde (12%), 1,1,2‐Trichloroethane (11%),Tetrachloroethene (10%)Papermaking, Kraft Pulping:BL Tanks HVLC, NSSCPulping0.15 0.103 (acetaldehyde)NEI46835 195 Woodland Pulp LLC Baileyville ME No No 4.86E‐06 Acetaldehyde (74%),Naphthalene (16%)Wastewater (Kraft) 0.20 15.2 (acetaldehyde)1.40 (chloroform)0.393 (methanol)0.118 (formaldehyde)NEI43207 526 Appleton Coated L.L.C. Combined Locks WI No No 4.32E‐06 Acetaldehyde (90%) Papermaking 0.22 0.662 (acetaldehyde)0.11 (chloroform)NEI13363 133 0147 Simpson Tacoma Kraft Co Tacoma WA Yes Yes 4.30E‐06 Formaldehyde (71%),Acetaldehyde (18%)Papermaking 0.07 4.62 (formaldehyde)0.875 (acetaldehyde)NEI41314 166 0190 International Paper Co. Georgetown SC Yes Yes 4.25E‐06 Acetaldehyde (39%), HCE(25%)Kraft Pulping: Decker,Bleaching: Kraft,Causticizing: Slaker,Wastewater (Kraft), KraftPulping: LVHC0.16 0.151 (acetaldehyde)NEI42211 187 0189 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Big Island VA Yes Yes 4.25E‐06 Acetaldehyde (83%) Papermaking, SemichemPulping0.20 1.29 (acetaldehyde)NEI7104 207 0226 Appleton Roaring Spring PA Yes Yes 4.09E‐06 1,1,2‐Trichloroethane(45%), Carbon tetrachloride(20%)Bleaching: Kraft 0.07 0.00494 (methanol)B‐2**Cancer MIR (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Cancer risk driver (% of** **risk) (Source: AECOM** **5 )** **Cancer risk driver (source group)** **(Source: AECOM 5** **) Chronic non** **cancer max HI (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Acute non-cancer max** **HQ(REL) (Source: EPA risk report** **2 )** **Survey NEI NEI revision** **reviewed (by RTI)** **Company name NEI revision** **received (by RTI)** **Mill state Mill city** **Subpart S category risk RTI code** **Comment no.** NEI40686 100 0175 Domtar Corporation Johnsonburg PA Yes Yes 3.85E‐06 HCE (50%), Acetaldehyde(22%), Formaldehyde (18%)Bleaching: Kraft,Causticizing: Misc & LimeMud0.07 0.104 (formaldehyde)NEI33135 & NEI706 145 NewPage Corporation Luke MD Yes Yes NEI33135:3.77E‐06NEI706:4.65E‐07Acetaldehyde (29%),Carbon tetrachloride (21%),Formaldehyde (14%)Kraft Pulping: Decker NEI33135:0.14NEI706:0.01NEI33135:0.530 (acetaldehyde)0.279 (formaldehyde)0.245 (chloroform)0.228 (methanol)NEI706:0.373 (formaldehyde)NEI41599 106 0185 Domtar Paper CompanyLLCKingsport TN Yes Yes 3.62E‐06 HCE (50%), Acetaldehyde(42%)Bleach Plant, Wastewater 0.14 1.09 (acetaldehyde)0.126 (methanol)NEI8178 430 0206 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Rincon GA Yes Yes 3.34E‐06 Acrylonitrile (66%),Acetaldehyde (21%)Papermaking, Wastewater:General0.06 0.914 (chloroform)0.475 (acetaldehyde)NEI8196 243 0210 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Brunswick GA Yes Yes 3.27E‐06 Acetaldehyde (73%) Wastewater: Kraft 0.14 1.98 (acetaldehyde)0.235 (formaldehyde)0.189 (chloroform)0.125 (methanol)NEI6450 147 MeadWestvaco Evadale TX Yes Yes 3.25E‐06 Acetaldehyde (47%),Formaldehyde (29%)Papermaking 0.09 1.20 (acetaldehyde)1.03 (chloroform)0.261 (formaldehyde)NEI26495 120 0190 TIN Inc., dba Temple‐Inland Rome GA Yes Yes 3.18E‐06 Formaldehyde (42%),Acetaldehyde (42%)Papermaking 0.09 0.512 (chloroform)0.474 (formaldehyde)0.386 (acetaldehyde)0.123 (methanol)B‐3**Cancer MIR (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Cancer risk driver (% of** **risk) (Source: AECOM** **5 )** **Cancer risk driver (source group)** **(Source: AECOM 5** **) Chronic non** **cancer max HI (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Acute non-cancer max** **HQ(REL) (Source: EPA risk report** **2 )** **Survey NEI NEI revision** **reviewed (by RTI)** **Company name NEI revision** **received (by RTI)** **Mill state Mill city** **Subpart S category risk RTI code** **Comment no.** NEI42357 139 Port Townsend Paper Corp. Port Townsend WA Yes Yes 3.10E‐06 Acetaldehyde (97%) Wastewater: Kraft 0.18 0.22 (acetaldehyde)0.135 (formaldehyde)NEI18660 196 0202 Domtar Industries Ashdown AR Yes Yes 3.04E‐06 Formaldehyde (35%),Acetaldehyde (33%), HCE(30%)Kraft Pulping, Papermaking,Bleaching0.08 0.821 (formaldehyde)0.496 (acetaldehyde)0.245 (methanol)0.144 (chloroform)NEIIL0215971511Ahlstrom Filtration LLCTaylorvilleILNoNo3.00E‐06Acetaldehyde (100%)Papermaking0.150.293 (acetaldehyde)NEI45182 105 0190 International Paper Co. Springfield OR Yes Yes 2.80E‐06 Formaldehyde (75%),Acetaldehyde (16%)Kraft Pulping: DigesterLVHC0.05 0.154 (acetaldehyde)0.145 (formaldehyde)NEI47104 176 0193 KapStone Roanoke Rapids NC Yes Yes 2.73E‐06 Acetaldehyde (86%) Papermaking 0.12 9.32 (acetaldehyde)1.48 (formaldehyde)0.261 (methanol)NEI12407 229 0183 Verso Paper Corp. Sartell MN Yes Yes 2.72E‐06 Cadmium (26%),Formaldehyde (20%),Nickel (13%), Acetaldehyde(13%), Arsenic (13%)Kraft Pulping: Incinerator,Mechanical Pulping,Papermaking0.09 0.573 (chloroform)NEI40247 174 0190 International Paper Co. Riegelwood NC Yes Yes 2.69E‐06 Acetaldehyde (40%),Formaldehyde (38%), HCE(19%)Kraft Pulping: Washing,Bleaching: Kraft, KraftPulping: Digester LVHC0.09 0.202 (formaldehyde)0.187 (acetaldehyde)NEI759 146 MeadWestvaco Covington VA Yes Yes 2.62E‐06 Acetaldehyde (40%),Carbon tetrachloride (19%),Formaldehyde (19%), 1,1,2‐Trichloroethane (14%)Kraft Pulping (DigesterLVHC, Knotter),Wastewater0.08 1.44 (chloroform)0.187 (acetaldehyde)0.123 (formaldehyde)0.112 (methanol)NEI8560 163 0190 International Paper Co. Prattville AL Yes Yes 2.58E‐06 Acetaldehyde (68%),Formaldehyde (26%)Wastewater, Papermaking 0.10 0.281 (acetaldehyde)0.267 (formaldehyde)NEI42482 436 0169 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Green Bay WI Yes Yes 2.46E‐06 Formaldehyde (87%) Bleaching 0.03 0.709 (formaldehyde)0.248 (chloroform)NEIVA00022 304 Greif Inc. Amherst VA No No 2.32E‐06 Acetaldehyde (79%),Benzene (21%)Papermaking, SemichemPulping0.10 0.37 (acetaldehyde)B‐4**Cancer MIR (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Cancer risk driver (% of** **risk) (Source: AECOM** **5 )** **Cancer risk driver (source group)** **(Source: AECOM 5** **) Chronic non** **cancer max HI (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Acute non-cancer max** **HQ(REL) (Source: EPA risk report** **2 )** **Survey NEI NEI revision** **reviewed (by RTI)** **Company name NEI revision** **received (by RTI)** **Mill state Mill city** **Subpart S category risk RTI code** **Comment no.** NEI34030 118 0199 UPM, Blandin Paper Co. Grand Rapids MN Yes Yes 2.30E‐06 Naphthalene (57%),Formaldehyde (20%)Papermaking 0.04 0.0476 (formaldehyde)NEI8278 124 Rock‐Tenn Co. Panama City FL Yes Yes 2.28E‐06 HCE (27%), Acetaldehyde(20%), Formaldehyde(14%), Tetrachloroethane(10%)Bleaching, Kraft Pulping:Washing, Papermaking,Causticizing0.07 0.107 (acetaldehyde)NEI11610 301 Rock‐Tenn Co. Cincinnati OH Yes Yes 2.27E‐06 Naphthalene (43%),Acetaldehyde (29%),Formaldehyde (28%)Papermaking 0.05 0.204 (formaldehyde)0.143 (acetaldehyde)NEI6261 610 0184 Verso Paper Corp. Jay ME Yes Yes 2.22E‐06 Acetaldehyde (67%),Naphthalene (27%)Wastewater, Mechanicalpulping, Papermaking0.12 0.486 (acetaldehyde0.291 (methanol)NEI43472244Sonoco Products Co.HartsvilleSCNoNo2.19E‐06Acetaldehyde (100%)Papermaking0.111.32 (acetaldehyde)NEI33883 155 0192 NewPage Corporation Escanaba MI Yes Yes 2.04E‐06 Acetaldehyde (49%),Formaldehyde (27%),Naphthalene (14%)Wastewater treatment 0.12 0.635 (formaldehyde)0.596 (acetaldehyde)NEI8186 531 0190 International Paper Co. Savannah GA Yes Yes 2.00E‐06 Formaldehyde (72%),Acetaldehyde (13%)Kraft Pulping: LVHC,Wastewater0.03 1.57 (formaldehyde)0.194 (acetaldehyde)NEI26476 115 Weyerhaeuser Co. Port Wentworth GA No No 1.91E‐060.10 1.09 (acetaldehyde)0.261 (methanol)0.181 (formaldehyde)NEI41565198AbitibiBowater Inc.CalhounTNNoNo1.89E‐060.131.27 (chloroform)NEI40738 389 0179 Proctor & Gamble PaperProducts Co.Mehoopany PA Yes Yes 1.86E‐060.06 0.229 (acetaldehyde)NEI11251 104 0190 International Paper Co. Valliant OK Yes Yes 1.84E‐060.06 0.475 (methanol)0.281 (acetaldehyde)NEI11172 613 0217 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Monticello MS Yes Yes 1.71E‐060.06 0.25 (acetaldehyde)B‐5**Cancer MIR (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Cancer risk driver (% of** **risk) (Source: AECOM** **5 )** **Cancer risk driver (source group)** **(Source: AECOM 5** **) Chronic non** **cancer max HI (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Acute non-cancer max** **HQ(REL) (Source: EPA risk report** **2 )** **Survey NEI NEI revision** **reviewed (by RTI)** **Company name NEI revision** **received (by RTI)** **Mill state Mill city** **Subpart S category risk RTI code** **Comment no.** NEI54342 189 0194 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Crossett AR Yes Yes 1.68E‐060.06 0.51 (acetaldehyde)0.212 (chloroform)0.174 (formaldehyde)0.126 (methanol)NEI26581 137 0155 Clearwater Paper Corp. Lewiston ID Yes Yes 1.49E‐060.03 0.0749 (acetaldehyde)NEI34066 242 0181/0191 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. New Augusta MS Yes Yes 1.44E‐060.04 0.317 (acetaldehyde)NEI11367 512 Ahlstrom Filtration LLC Madisonville KY No No 1.42E‐060.16 2.07 (formaldehyde)1.18 (methanol)0.347 (triethylamine)0.176 (phenol)NEI18658 171 0187 Evergreen Packaging Pine Bluff AR Yes Yes 1.39E‐060.22 2.9 (chloroform)0.653 (methanol)0.311 (acetaldehyde)NEI7181 182 0201 Glatfelter Spring Grove PA Yes Yes 1.35E‐060.05 0.196 (chloroform)NEI34070 167 0190 International Paper Co. Redwood MS Yes Yes 1.32E‐060.04 0.243 (acetaldehyde)0.211 (methanol)0.154 (formaldehyde)NEI13340 140 Pope & Talbot Inc. Halsey OR No No 1.29E‐060.14 4.67 (formaldehyde)2.57 (acetaldehyde)1.58 (methanol)0.742 (chloroform)NEI26526 240 Rayonier Inc. Jesup GA No No 1.28E‐060.13 0.541 (chloroform)0.153 (acetaldehyde)0.145 (methanol)0.121 (formaldehyde)NEI54400 365 0151 Domtar Paper CompanyLLCRothschild WI Yes Yes 1.18E‐060.04 0.828 (chloroform)0.177 (formaldehyde)0.163 (acetaldehyde)NEI8265 525 0203 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Palatka FL Yes Yes 1.16E‐060.03 0.669 (methanol)0.505 (chloroform)0.445 (acetaldehyde)0.107 (formaldehyde)NEI42341B 371 North Pacific Paper Corp.(Norpac)Longview WA No No 1.15E‐060.03 0.459 (formaldehyde)0.112 (acetaldehyde)B‐6**Cancer MIR (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Cancer risk driver (% of** **risk) (Source: AECOM** **5 )** **Cancer risk driver (source group)** **(Source: AECOM 5** **) Chronic non** **cancer max HI (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Acute non-cancer max** **HQ(REL) (Source: EPA risk report** **2 )** **Survey NEI NEI revision** **reviewed (by RTI)** **Company name NEI revision** **received (by RTI)** **Mill state Mill city** **Subpart S category risk RTI code** **Comment no.** NEI33025 orNEW71411108 0190 International Paper Co. Campti LA Yes Yes 1.10E‐060.04 0.128 (acetaldehyde)0.105 (chloroform)NEI33023 226 Rock‐Tenn Co. Hodge LA Yes Yes 1.10E‐060.03 0.0937 (acetaldehyde)NEI46814 119 TIN Inc., dba Temple‐Inland Bogalusa LA No No 1.10E‐060.03 0.114 (acetaldehyde)NEI6273 150 0159 NewPage Corporation Rumford ME Yes Yes 1.09E‐060.04 0.246 (chloroform)0.211 (methanol)0.126 (acetaldehyde)NEI46599 185 0188 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Camas WA Yes Yes 1.05E‐060.03 0.182 (formaldehyde)0.123 (chloroform)NEI8619 116 0190 International Paper Co. Pine Hill AL Yes Yes 1.04E‐060.04 0.231 (acetaldehyde)NEI42254 131 Rock‐Tenn Co. West Point VA Yes Yes 1.02E‐060.05 0.142 (methanol)B‐7**Cancer MIR (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Cancer risk driver (% of** **risk) (Source: AECOM** **5 )** **Cancer risk driver (source group)** **(Source: AECOM 5** **) Chronic non** **cancer max HI (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Acute non-cancer max** **HQ(REL) (Source: EPA risk report** **2 )** **Survey NEI NEI revision** **reviewed (by RTI)** **Company name NEI revision** **received (by RTI)** **Mill state Mill city** **Subpart S category risk RTI code** **Comment no.** NEI47074 107 0204 Domtar Paper CompanyLLCBennettsville SC Yes Yes 1.02E‐060.03 0.332 (formaldehyde)0.257 (acetaldehyde)0.107 (chloroform)NEI26491 190 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Cedar Springs GA No No 9.95E‐070.04 0.24 (acetaldehyde)0.168 (formaldehyde)NEI8261 132 Rock‐Tenn Co. FernandinaBeachFL Yes Yes 9.31E‐070.03 0.0926 (acetaldehyde)NEI26309 178 0190 International Paper Co. Cantonment FL Yes Yes 9.23E‐070.04 0.173 (acetaldehyde)0.11 (methanol)NEI45206 111 0154 Weyerhaeuser Co. Vanceboro NC Yes Yes 8.85E‐070.01 0.104 (acetaldehyde)NEI41252 151 KapStone North Charleston SC No No 8.85E‐070.02 0.465 (methanol)0.24 (acetaldehyde)0.185 (formaldehyde)NEI7559201Boise Inc.DeRidderLANoNo8.80E‐070.040.251 (acetaldehyde)NEI33013 169 0190 International Paper Co. Mansfield LA Yes Yes 8.44E‐070.03 0.144 (methanol)0.135 (formaldehyde)NEI11461 128 Rock‐Tenn Co. Coshocton OH Yes Yes 8.18E‐070.04 0.514 (acetaldehyde)NEI33945 247 Packaging Corp. of America Filer City MI No No 8.16E‐070.04 0.258 (acetaldehyde)NEI40554 615 0211 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Clatskanie OR Yes Yes 8.00E‐070.01 0.0266 (acetaldehyde)NEI26504 143 0200 Packaging Corp. of America Clyattville GA Yes Yes 7.94E‐070.03 0.0469 (acetaldehyde)B‐8**Cancer MIR (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Cancer risk driver (% of** **risk) (Source: AECOM** **5 )** **Cancer risk driver (source group)** **(Source: AECOM 5** **) Chronic non** **cancer max HI (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Acute non-cancer max** **HQ(REL) (Source: EPA risk report** **2 )** **Survey NEI NEI revision** **reviewed (by RTI)** **Company name NEI revision** **received (by RTI)** **Mill state Mill city** **Subpart S category risk RTI code** **Comment no.** NEI18335 172 0190 International Paper Co. Selma AL Yes Yes 7.69E‐070.05 0.167 (acetaldehyde)0.132 (methanol)NEI11338 152 0166 NewPage Corporation Wickliffe KY Yes Yes 7.44E‐070.03 0.133 (acetaldehyde)NEI46852 340 Green Bay Packaging Inc. Morrilton AR No No 7.35E‐070.04 0.746 (acetaldehyde)NEI18390199AbitibiBowater Inc.Coosa PinesALNoNo6.85E‐070.020.0662 (acetaldehyde)NEI23 339 Halltown Paperboard Co. Halltown WV No No 6.53E‐070.03 0.0323 (acetaldehyde)NEI42341A 102 Weyerhaeuser Co. Longview WA Yes Yes 6.47E‐070.07 4.03 (chloroform)0.736 (acetaldehyde)NEI46817 184 0198 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Zachary LA Yes Yes 6.43E‐070.02 1.03 (acetaldehyde)0.675 (chloroform)0.231 (methanol)0.163 (formaldehyde)NEI47077 200 AbitibiBowater Inc. Catawba SC No No 6.42E‐070.04 0.694 (acetaldehyde)0.343 (methanol)NEI26471 180 Graphic PackagingInternational, Inc.Macon GA No No 6.28E‐070.01 0.363 (acetaldehyde)0.213 (formaldehyde)NEI33103 183 Red Shield Environmental Old Town ME No No 5.54E‐070.03 0.203 (chloroform)0.186 (acetaldehyde)NEI42689117Wausau PaperMosineeWINoNo5.50E‐070.100.421 (HCl)NEI46866 122 TIN Inc., dba Temple‐Inland Waverly TN No No 5.40E‐070.03 0.253 (acetaldehyde)NEI42486 341 Green Bay Packaging Inc. Green Bay WI No No 5.12E‐070.01 0.0999 (formaldehyde)NEI6175 514 Hollingsworth & Vose Co. West Groton MA No No 5.08E‐070.00 0.0414 (formaldehyde)NEI26382 241 Rayonier Inc. FernandinaBeachFL No No 5.05E‐070.02 1.10 (chloroform)NEI42329 414 Nippon Paper IndustriesUSA Co., Ltd.Port Angeles WA No No 5.05E‐070.01 0.0929 (formaldehyde)NEI42338 156 0158 Longview Fibre Co. Longview WA Yes Yes 5.02E‐070.03 1.46 (formaldehyde)0.39 (chloroform)NEI46931148MeadWestvacoCottontonALNoNo4.77E‐070.020.167 (acetaldehyde)NEI9201 103 Domtar Paper CompanyLLCPlymouth NC No No 4.73E‐070.02 0.0406 (acetaldehyde)NEI41628 165 0190 International Paper Co. Queen City TX Yes Yes 4.52E‐070.03 0.715 (methanol)0.201 (acetaldehyde)0.159 (chloroform)NEI12411 202 Boise Inc. InternationalFallsMN No No 4.44E‐070.02 0.0908 (chloroform)B‐9**Cancer MIR (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Cancer risk driver (% of** **risk) (Source: AECOM** **5 )** **Cancer risk driver (source group)** **(Source: AECOM 5** **) Chronic non** **cancer max HI (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Acute non-cancer max** **HQ(REL) (Source: EPA risk report** **2 )** **Survey NEI NEI revision** **reviewed (by RTI)** **Company name NEI revision** **received (by RTI)** **Mill state Mill city** **Subpart S category risk RTI code** **Comment no.** NEI18338 130 0186 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Brewton AL Yes Yes 4.31E‐070.01 0.505 (acetaldehyde)0.342 (chloroform)NEI18357 600 0190 International Paper Co. Courtland AL Yes Yes 4.29E‐070.01 0.244 (methanol)0.20 (acetaldehyde)NEI26514 175 0190 International Paper Co. Augusta GA Yes Yes 4.17E‐070.02 0.57 (acetaldehyde)0.227 (methanol)0.165 (formaldehyde)NEI34064 112 Weyerhaeuser Co. Columbus MS No No 3.90E‐070.04 0.75 (acetaldehyde)0.127 (methanol)NEI12492 121 TIN Inc., dba Temple‐Inland Orange TX No No 3.83E‐070.01 0.296 (methanol)0.261 (formaldehyde)NEI33118 135 Sappi Fine Paper NorthAmericaSkowhegan ME No No 3.83E‐070.01 0.571 (chloroform)0.247 (acetaldehyde)NEI18657 197 Delta Natural Kraft Pine Bluff AR No No 3.70E‐070.01 8.54 (1,2‐dimethoxyethane)2.75 (formaldehyde)0.795 (acetaldehyde)0.518 (methanol)NEIMA10626425Onyx Specialty PapersSouth LeeMANoNo3.62E‐070.000.235 (formaldehyde)NEI18347 245 Rock‐Tenn Co. Stevenson AL Yes Yes 3.57E‐070.02 1.00 (acetaldehyde)0.40 (methanol)NEI208 409 Bear Island Paper Co., LLC Ashland VA No No 3.54E‐070.02 4.16 (chloroform)0.414 (acetaldehyde)NEI46760 162 0190 International Paper Co. Eastover SC Yes Yes 3.49E‐070.07 0.0459 (chloroform)NEI43202216Wausau PaperRhinelanderWINoNo3.35E‐070.010.0107 (acetaldehyde)NEI8601205Boise Inc.JacksonALNoNo2.93E‐070.010.078 (acetaldehyde)NEI18373 208228535 0178 Alabama River Cellulose Perdue Hill AL Yes Yes 2.92E‐070.01 1.53 (acetaldehyde)0.639 (methanol)0.12 (formaldehyde)NEI33887177Verso Paper Corp.QuinnesecMINoNo2.88E‐070.010.114 (chloroform)NEI42317 126 Rock‐Tenn Co. Hopewell VA Yes Yes 2.83E‐070.01 0.36 (acetaldehyde)NEI26487 391 Proctor & Gamble PaperProducts Co.Albany GA No No 2.79E‐070.01 0.0562 (acetaldehyde)B‐10**Cancer MIR (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Cancer risk driver (% of** **risk) (Source: AECOM** **5 )** **Cancer risk driver (source group)** **(Source: AECOM 5** **) Chronic non** **cancer max HI (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Acute non-cancer max** **HQ(REL) (Source: EPA risk report** **2 )** **Survey NEI NEI revision** **reviewed (by RTI)** **Company name NEI revision** **received (by RTI)** **Mill state Mill city** **Subpart S category risk RTI code** **Comment no.** NEI45474 179 Rock‐Tenn Co. Demopolis AL Yes Yes 2.77E‐070.11 1.93 (chlorine)0.261 (formaldehyde)0.163 (methanol)0.129 (acetaldehyde)0.104 (chloroform)NEI42710164Thilmany Papers, LLCKaukaunaWINoNo2.73E‐070.010.213 (acetaldehyde)NEI8122232Augusta Newsprint Co.AugustaGANoNo2.62E‐070.010.0206 (acetaldehyde)NEI42730192Fraser Papers Inc.Park FallsWINoNo2.40E‐070.010.0694 (chloroform)NEIWI4050324 520 0169 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Green Bay WI Yes Yes 2.18E‐070.14 0.0581 (chloroform)NEI33981 468 0213 Domtar Paper CompanyLLCPort Huron MI Yes Yes 2.13E‐070.01 0.00673 (acetaldehyde)NEI42410 203 Boise Inc. Wallula WA No No 1.93E‐070.01 0.339 (chloroform)0.119 (methanol)NEIMN14904368611NewPage CorporationDuluthMNNoNo1.89E‐070.010.0203 (acetaldehyde)NEI39968193Finch Paper LLCGlens FallsNYNoNo1.86E‐070.140.0533 (chloroform)NEI13216210Catalyst PaperSnowflakeAZNoNo1.76E‐070.000.0305 (formaldehyde)NEI12368 136 Sappi Fine Paper NorthAmericaCloquet MN No No 1.73E‐070.00 0.0267 (acetaldehyde)NEI26506 114 Weyerhaeuser Co. Oglethorpe GA No No 1.59E‐070.01 0.405 (methanol)0.143 (acetaldehyde)NEI11108 231 AbitibiBowater Inc. Grenada MS No No 1.57E‐070.01 0.00706 (acetaldehyde)NEI42495500Thilmany Papers, LLCDe PereWINoNo1.51E‐070.010.0108 (acetaldehyde)NEI12980 428 0173 Georgia‐Pacific Corp. Muskogee OK Yes Yes 1.49E‐070.01 0.0734 (chloroform)NEI33104 157 Lincoln Paper and Tissue Lincoln ME No No 1.48E‐070.00 0.00601 (formaldehyde)NEI42800 375 Shawano Specialty Papers Shawano WI No No 1.47E‐070.01 0.0113 (acetaldehyde)NEI42690215Wausau PaperBrokawWINoNo1.45E‐070.010.153 (chloroform)NEI18652 138 0176 Clearwater Paper Corp. McGehee AR Yes Yes 1.29E‐070.05 0.177 (methanol)NEI35908 173 0190 International Paper Co. Ticonderoga NY Yes Yes 1.17E‐070.01 0.153 (chloroform)NEIWI7500086 &NEIWIT$8597224 NewPage Corporation Stevens Point WI No No NEIWI7500086:1.13E‐07NEIWIT$8597:0.00E+00NEIWI7500086:0.01NEIWIT$8597:0.00NEIWI7500086:0.0061 (acetaldehyde)NEIWIT$8596:0.000427 (methanol)NEIWI0793640 254 Wisconsin PaperboardCorp.Milwaukee WI No No 1.12E‐070.00 0.00964 (formaldehyde)B‐11**Cancer MIR (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Cancer risk driver (% of** **risk) (Source: AECOM** **5 )** **Cancer risk driver (source group)** **(Source: AECOM 5** **) Chronic non** **cancer max HI (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Acute non-cancer max** **HQ(REL) (Source: EPA risk report** **2 )** **Survey NEI NEI revision** **reviewed (by RTI)** **Company name NEI revision** **received (by RTI)** **Mill state Mill city** **Subpart S category risk RTI code** **Comment no.** NEI7933 127 Rock‐Tenn Co. Florence SC Yes Yes 1.08E‐070.00 0.0721 (acetaldehyde)NEI8177159Interstate Paper L.L.C.RiceboroGANoNo1.07E‐070.000.0163 (formaldehyde)NEI6284230Verso Paper Corp.BucksportMENoNo1.05E‐070.000.0145 (formaldehyde)NEI46750 141 Packaging Corp. of America Tomahawk WI No No 9.83E‐080.00 0.0302 (acetaldehyde)NEI34020 213 Wausau Paper Brainerd MN No No 9.79E‐080.00 0.00528 (acetaldehyde)NEI11602 288 Graphic PackagingInternational, Inc.Middletown OH No No 7.40E‐080.00 0.00499 (acetaldehyde)NEIPA1013489 322 Newman & Co., Inc. Philadelphia PA No No 7.36E‐080.00 0.00484 (acetaldehyde)NEI2INT16350315Temple‐InlandCayugaINNoNo6.75E‐080.000.0811 (formaldehyde)NEITN1050093 435 Kimberly‐Clark Worldwide,Inc.Loudon TN No No 6.34E‐080.01 5.24 (chloroform)NEI11645 451 Appleton West Carrollton OH No No 6.13E‐080.07 1.90 (chloroform)NEI11600373Smart Papers L.L.C.HamiltonOHNoNo5.51E‐080.000.0215 (acetaldehyde)NEI36019 433 Knowlton Technologies, LLC Watertown NY No No 5.18E‐080.00 0.00339 (methanol)NEICT3102275Cascades BoxboardVersaillesCTNoNo5.01E‐080.000.0288 (acetaldehyde)NEIWI4710355 382 SCA Tissue North America,L.L.C.Menasha WI No No 4.43E‐080.00 0.0207 (chloroform)NEI42961 223 NewPage Corporation WisconsinRapidsWI No No 4.32E‐080.00 0.00353 (acetaldehyde)NEW73505 311 Republic Paperboard Co. Lawton OK No No 4.22E‐080.00 0.00656 (acetaldehyde)NEI40488149GlatfelterChillicotheOHNoNo3.76E‐080.000.0103 (acetaldehyde)NEIGAT$3911369SP Newsprint Co.East DublinGANoNo3.39E‐080.020.188 (HCl)NEI33866 403 Neenah Paper, Inc. Munising MI No No 2.45E‐080.00 0.00335 (acetaldehyde)NEI7106 501 American Eagle Paper MillsInc.Tyrone PA No No 1.40E‐080.00 0.022 (1,2‐dimethoxyethane)NEI33950 423 Menominee Paper Co. /Cellu TissueMenominee MI No No 8.45E‐090.00 0.00261 (acetaldehyde)NEI40720 290 PaperWorks Industries, Inc. Philadelphia PA No No 7.58E‐090.00 0.000713 (methanol)B‐12**Cancer MIR (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Cancer risk driver (% of** **risk) (Source: AECOM** **5 )** **Cancer risk driver (source group)** **(Source: AECOM 5** **) Chronic non** **cancer max HI (Source: EPA risk** **report 2** **) Acute non-cancer max** **HQ(REL) (Source: EPA risk report** **2 )** **Survey NEI NEI revision** **reviewed (by RTI)** **Company name NEI revision** **received (by RTI)** **Mill state Mill city** **Subpart S category risk RTI code** **Comment no.** NEI26304 289 Rock‐Tenn Co. Jacksonville FL Yes Yes 4.13E‐090.00 0.00319 (chloroform)NEINY5532600 508513 Hollingsworth & Vose Co. Greenwich NY No No 1.44E‐090.00 0.0000659 (acetaldehyde)NEI40553 204 Boise Inc. St Helens OR No No 4.20E‐100.00 0.0000243 (formaldehyde)NEINY5533400 496 Hollingsworth & Vose Co. Easton NY No No 3.12E‐100.00 0.0000815 (acetaldehyde)NEI2WAT18798 370 Ponderay Newsprint Co. Usk WA No No 0.00E+000.00 0.31 (methanol)NEI42385 158 Kimberly‐Clark Worldwide,Inc.Everett WA No No 0.00E+000.00 0.000321 (methanol)NEIGAT$3909 516 Hollingsworth & Vose Co. Hawkinsville GA No No 0.00E+000.00 0.00644 (methanol)NEI33072 387 Sappi Fine Paper NorthAmericaWestbrook ME No No ‐‐‐‐ ‐‐NEI33986 429 Manistique Papers Inc. Manistique MI No No ‐‐‐‐ ‐‐NEIMA131179 515 Hollingsworth & Vose Co. East Walpole MA No No ‐‐‐‐ ‐‐NEIWA0270002 518 Grays Harbor Paper, LLC Hoquiam WA No No ‐‐‐‐ ‐‐**171 81 81** Notes:a. Chronic non‐cancer max HI results are low (<1) for all mills, so HI values were not considered in the risk remodeling evaluation. Note: HI values of 0.00 simply mean that HI is less than 0.005 (i.e., cannot be rounded to 0.01).b. Acute non‐cancer HQ(REL) results are available for multiple pollutants. Note: Table only includes HQ(REL) values above 0.1, unless highest HQ(REL) for a mill was below 0.1, in which case the highest HQ(REL) value for the mill was included.c. Yellow‐shaded cells are used to link the risk data in this table to the cells in the table where facilities made NEI data revisions that could reduce risk.d. The total baseline number at the bottom of this table does not represent all mills (only those submitting NEI revisions); the total baseline including all mills is approximately 45,000 tpy.Acronyms/abbreviations:ASB = aerated stabilization basinHCE = hexachloroethaneLVHC = low‐volume high‐concentrationPB = power boilerBL = black liquorHCl = hydrogen chlorideMIBK = methyl isobutyl ketonePCB = polychlorinated biphenylBLO = black liquor oxidationHD = high‐densityMIR = maximum individual riskPOM = polycyclic organic matterBSW = brownstock washerHI = hazard indexNCG = non‐condensable gasRF = recovery furnaceClO2 = chlorine dioxideHQ(REL) = hazard quotient reference exposure levelNDCE = nondirect‐contact evaporatorSCC = source classification codeCr+6 = hexavalent chromiumHVLC = high‐volume low‐concentrationNEI = National Emissions InventorySDT = smelt dissolving tankCS2 = carbon disulfidelat/long = latitude/longitudeNSSC = neutral sulfite semichemicalSOG = stripper off‐gasEU = emission unitLD = low‐densityO2 = oxygenWWT = wastewater treatmentHAP = hazardous air pollutantLK = lime kilnOCC = old corrugated cardboardWWTP = wastewater treatment plantB‐13NEI32869ANEI18334NEI40648NEI40282NEIWI7720116,NEI46739, &NEI42963NEIME0250002NEI42695**Survey NEI Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions** **Reduced stack gas temperature** **Reduced stack gas velocity or flow Added emission units Added HAPs** **Changed from stack to fugitive** Reduced stack height for screens,lime mud filter, green liquorprocessing when changed theirrelease point type from fugitive tostackIncreased formaldehyde, Cr+6, 2other HAPs from recovery furnaceIncreased acetaldehyde, methanol,formaldehyde, metals, naphthalene,5 other HAPs from SDTReduced velocity of NCGincinerationAdded metals, chloroform,POM, toluene, hexane to RFAdded Cr+6, POM, 6 otherHAPs to SDTNEI46739: Increased acetaldehyde,methanol, benzene, MIBK, toluenefrom causticizing miscReduced stack temp ofboilersAdded replacement stackrecords for pressurizedgroundwood emission units(with lower emissions thanrecords being replaced)**NEI revisions which may increase risk**B‐14NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI41552NEI6057NEI47091NEI40600NEI46835NEI43207NEI13363NEI41314NEI42211NEI7104**Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions Reduced stack gas** **temperature Reduced stack gas velocity** **or flow Added emission units Added HAPs Changed from stack to** **fugitive NEI revisions which may increase risk** Reduced stack height for papermachines (3 unique records)Increased acetaldehyde from papermachines (2 records)Reduced velocity of papermachines (3 uniquerecords)Added replacement stackrecords for BL tanks (2unique records)Increased acetaldehyde,formaldehyde, methanol,naphthalene, metals, 29 other HAPsfrom RF, SDT, LKIncreased metals, HCl from boilersAdded replacement stackrecords for paper machinesAdded metals to boilerB‐15NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI40686NEI33135 & NEI706NEI41599NEI8178NEI8196NEI6450NEI26495**Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions Reduced stack gas** **temperature Reduced stack gas velocity** **or flow Added emission units Added HAPs Changed from stack to** **fugitive NEI revisions which may increase risk** Added bis(2‐ethylhexyl)phthalete, dibutyl phthalate,toluene to WWTP1/2;formaldehyde to WWTP1;cresol, phenol to WWTP2Increased acetaldehyde, chloroform,methanol, toluene, biphenyl fromdeckerAdded replacement(consolidated) records forpaper machinesAdded 10 HAPs to bleachplant, paper machines,deckerB‐16NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI42357NEI18660NEIIL0215971NEI45182NEI47104NEI12407NEI40247NEI759NEI8560NEI42482NEIVA00022**Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions Reduced stack gas** **temperature Reduced stack gas velocity** **or flow Added emission units Added HAPs Changed from stack to** **fugitive NEI revisions which may increase risk** Reduced fugitive area ofASBAdded phenol to digesterchip binAdded phenol to digesterchip binAdded formaldehyde to EUBLT14 (Bleach Tower 4)B‐17NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI34030NEI8278NEI11610NEI6261NEI43472NEI33883NEI8186NEI26476NEI41565NEI40738NEI11251NEI11172**Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions Reduced stack gas** **temperature Reduced stack gas velocity** **or flow Added emission units Added HAPs Changed from stack to** **fugitive NEI revisions which may increase risk** Reduced stack height for mechpulpingReduced stack velocity,flow for mech pulpingAdded replacement recordsfor paper machine wet/dryendAdded replacement recordsfor paper machine for all 12vents on machineIncreased methylene chloride fromLVHCAdded replacement recordsfor paper machine wet/dryendReduced fugitive area ofWWTB‐18NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI54342NEI26581NEI34066NEI11367NEI18658NEI7181NEI34070NEI13340NEI26526NEI54400NEI8265NEI42341B**Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions Reduced stack gas** **temperature Reduced stack gas velocity** **or flow Added emission units Added HAPs Changed from stack to** **fugitive NEI revisions which may increase risk** Reduced stack height of BL tanks Reduced fugitive area of BLtanksAdded replacement recordsfor paper machine wet anddry endB‐19NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI33025 orNEW71411NEI33023NEI46814NEI6273NEI46599NEI8619NEI42254**Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions Reduced stack gas** **temperature Reduced stack gas velocity** **or flow Added emission units Added HAPs Changed from stack to** **fugitive NEI revisions which may increase risk** Reduced fugitive area ofprimary clarifier, WWTPIncreased metals, PCB emissionsfrom boilersAdded Cr+3, methanol, POM,PCBs, 11 other HAPs toboilersIncreased acetaldehyde from papermachines, pulp dryerAdded replacement recordsand new records for boilersAdded total xylenes toscreens, LKB‐20NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI47074NEI26491NEI8261NEI26309NEI45206NEI41252NEI7559NEI33013NEI11461NEI33945NEI40554NEI26504**Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions Reduced stack gas** **temperature Reduced stack gas velocity** **or flow Added emission units Added HAPs Changed from stack to** **fugitive NEI revisions which may increase risk** Added replacement stackrecords for green liquorprocessing, paper machinesAdded updated replacementrecords for PB5 and PB7(increases emissions)Added replacement recordsfor secondary clarifier andboilerB‐21NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI18335NEI11338NEI46852NEI18390NEI23NEI42341ANEI46817NEI47077NEI26471NEI33103NEI42689NEI46866NEI42486NEI6175NEI26382NEI42329NEI42338NEI46931NEI9201NEI41628NEI12411**Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions Reduced stack gas** **temperature Reduced stack gas velocity** **or flow Added emission units Added HAPs Changed from stack to** **fugitive NEI revisions which may increase risk** Reduced fugitive area ofWWTAdded chloroform to WWTactivated sludge treatmentsystem (tanks 1‐3)B‐22NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI18338NEI18357NEI26514NEI34064NEI12492NEI33118NEI18657NEIMA10626NEI18347NEI208NEI46760NEI43202NEI8601NEI18373NEI33887NEI42317NEI26487**Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions Reduced stack gas** **temperature Reduced stack gas velocity** **or flow Added emission units Added HAPs Changed from stack to** **fugitive NEI revisions which may increase risk** Added ASB (acetaldehyde,CS2, chloroform,formaldehyde, methanol,naphthalene)Reduced fugitive area ofWWTP6Reduced fugitive area forprimary/ secondary clarifierAdded replacement recordsfor primary/secondaryclarifier, ASBB‐23NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI45474NEI42710NEI8122NEI42730NEIWI4050324NEI33981NEI42410NEIMN14904NEI39968NEI13216NEI12368NEI26506NEI11108NEI42495NEI12980NEI33104NEI42800NEI42690NEI18652NEI35908NEIWI7500086 &NEIWIT$8597NEIWI0793640**Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions Reduced stack gas** **temperature Reduced stack gas velocity** **or flow Added emission units Added HAPs Changed from stack to** **fugitive NEI revisions which may increase risk** Added vinyl acetate todryformerReduced stack temp ofboilersReduced velocity of BleachTower 1; flow unchangedB‐24NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI7933NEI8177NEI6284NEI46750NEI34020NEI11602NEIPA1013489NEI2INT16350NEITN1050093NEI11645NEI11600NEI36019NEICT3102NEIWI4710355NEI42961NEW73505NEI40488NEIGAT$3911NEI33866NEI7106NEI33950NEI40720**Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions Reduced stack gas** **temperature Reduced stack gas velocity** **or flow Added emission units Added HAPs Changed from stack to** **fugitive NEI revisions which may increase risk** B‐25NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI26304NEINY5532600NEI40553NEINY5533400NEI2WAT18798NEI42385NEIGAT$3909NEI33072NEI33986NEIMA131179NEIWA0270002**171 Reduced release height Reduced fugitive area Increased emissions** **Reduced stack gas temperature** **Reduced stack gas velocity or flow Added emission units Added HAPs** **Changed from stack to fugitive** **NEI revisions which may increase risk**Added records for primaryclarifier, ASB**4 7 8 2 4 15 11 0**B‐26NEI32869ANEI18334NEI40648NEI40282NEIWI7720116,NEI46739, &NEI42963NEIME0250002NEI42695**Survey NEI Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions** **Increased stack gas temperature** **Increased stack gas velocity or flow Deleted emission units Deleted HAPs** **Changed from fugitive to stack** Reduced acetaldehyde, formaldehydefrom paper machines, pulp dryerDeleted HCE from bleach plant,pulp storageIncreased stack height forSDT and multiple subpart Sunits (50) when changedtheir release point type fromfugitive to stackReduced naphthalene from WWTReduced acetaldehyde, carbontetrachloride, chloroform,formaldehyde, methanol, naphthalene,phenol, other HAPs from deckerReduced acetaldehyde metals,methanol, naphthalene, 7 other HAPsfrom RFReduced chloroform, metals, 18 otherHAPs from SDTIncreased stacktemperature for SDT andmultiple subpart S units(46) when changed theirrelease point type fromfugitive to stackIncreased stackvelocity/flow for SDT andmultiple subpart S units(55) (56 if include just stackflow of NCG incineration)when changed releasepoint typeDeleted records for bleachplant, knotter, BSW, digester,screens (accounted forelsewhere) and decker,causticizing misc, lime mudwasher (no longer in service)(includes acetaldehyde,chloroform, formaldehyde,methanol, naphthalene)Deleted HCE from bleach plantsDeleted HCl from RFChanged release pointtype for SDT and multiplesubpart S units (56) fromfugitive to stackReduced acetaldehyde, formaldehydefrom paper machinesReduced 1,2‐dichloroethane from BSWDeleted 1,2‐dichloroethanefrom O2 delignification, LK,boilerNEIWI7720116:Reduced acetaldehyde, chloroform,formaldehyde, methanol, catechol,cresol, ethylene glycol, phenol fromWWTNEI46739: Reduced chloroform,formaldehyde, 7 other HAPs fromcausticizing miscNEI46739: Deleted carbontetrachloride and 1,1,2‐trichloroethane fromcausticizing miscIncreased stack height ofpressurized groundwoodemission units whenreplaced them with stackequivalentsIncreased stack height ofboilersIncreased stacktemperature forpressurized groundwoodemission units whenreplaced them with stackequivalentsIncreased stackvelocity/flow forpressurized groundwoodemission units whenreplaced them with stackequivalentsIncreased stackvelocity/flow of boilersDeleted fugitive records forpressurized groundwoodemission units (to be replacedwith lower emission records foracetaldehyde, formaldehyde,methanol, phenol, naphthalene,etc.)Changed release pointtype for pressurizedgroundwood emissionunits from fugitive tostackDeleted antimony, beryllium,and cadmium from digester**NEI revisions which may reduce risk**B‐27NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI41552NEI6057NEI47091NEI40600NEI46835NEI43207NEI13363NEI41314NEI42211NEI7104**Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions Increased stack gas** **temperature Increased stack gas** **velocity or flow Deleted emission units Deleted HAPs Changed from fugitive to** **stack NEI revisions which may reduce risk** Reduced acetaldehyde from papermachines (91 records) and ASB (1record)Increased velocity and flowof BL tanks (4 uniquerecords)Deleted fugitive records for BLtanks (to be replaced) (2 uniquerecords)Deleted acetaldehyde fromWWT primary settling basinChanged release pointtype for BL tanks fromfugitive to stack (3 uniquerecords)Reduced metals, chloroform, 11 otherHAPs from RF, SDT, LKReduced metals from boilersDeleted HCE from bleach plant,BSWReduced acetaldehyde, formaldehyde,chloroform, methanol, 19 other HAPsfrom black liquor storage tanksDeleted fugitive records forpaper machines (to bereplaced)Reduced acetaldehyde, formaldehydefrom WWTDeleted records for causticizingmisc, lime slaker (includesacetaldehyde, chloroform,methanol, naphthalene)Deleted HCE from bleach plantsDeleted naphthalene fromcausticizing misc, LVHC, NCGincinerator, BLO unitDeleted 8 other HAPs fromWWTIncreased stack height forbleach plant, deckersReduced metals from boilerDeleted methylene chloride andCS2 from lime kilnB‐28NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI40686NEI33135 & NEI706NEI41599NEI8178NEI8196NEI6450NEI26495**Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions Increased stack gas** **temperature Increased stack gas** **velocity or flow Deleted emission units Deleted HAPs Changed from fugitive to** **stack NEI revisions which may reduce risk** Deleted HCE from bleach plantDeleted acetaldehyde,chloroform, formaldehyde,methanol, 18 other HAPs fromcausticizingDeleted acetaldehyde, acrolein,chloroform, formaldehyde,methanol, naphthalene, 28other HAPs from SDTIncreased stack heights fordecker, knotter, pulpstorage, black liquor tanks,causticizing when changedrelease point typeReduced formaldehyde from whiteliquor processingIncreased stacktemperature for decker,knotter, pulp storage, blackliquor tanks, causticizingwhen changed releasepoint typeIncreased stackvelocity/flow for decker,knotter, pulp storage, blackliquor tanks, causticizingwhen changed releasepoint typeDeleted records for BSW(emissions go to power boilers)(includes acetaldehyde,formaldehyde, methanol,carbon tetrachloride)Changed release pointtype for decker, knotter,pulp storage, black liquortanks, causticizing fromfugitive to stackReduced acetaldehyde, methanol fromWWTP1/2, formaldehyde from WWTP2Deleted HCE from bleach plantDeleted acetaldehyde,chloroform, formaldehyde,methanol, naphthalene, 21other HAPs from causticizingDeleted acetaldehyde, acrolein,chloroform, formaldehyde,methanol, naphthalene, 28other HAPs from SDTReduced acetaldehyde, formaldehyde,chloroform, methanol, toluene,benzene, MIBK, CS2 from WWT, deckerDeleted unconsolidated recordsfor paper machines (to bereplaced)Deleted naphthalene fromWWT and acrylonitrile frompaper machinesIncreased stack heights forlime mud filter, lime slakerReduced acetaldehyde, naphthalenefrom WWTIncreased stacktemperature for lime mudfilter when changed itsrelease point typeIncreased stackvelocity/flow for lime mudfilter when changed releasepoint typeDeleted toluene‐2,4‐diaminefrom black liquor storage tanksChanged release pointtype for lime mud filterfrom fugitive to stackIncreased fugitive areafor WWT and papermachinesReduced acetaldehyde, formaldehydeemissions from paper machinesB‐29NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI42357NEI18660NEIIL0215971NEI45182NEI47104NEI12407NEI40247NEI759NEI8560NEI42482NEIVA00022**Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions Increased stack gas** **temperature Increased stack gas** **velocity or flow Deleted emission units Deleted HAPs Changed from fugitive to** **stack NEI revisions which may reduce risk** Reduced acetaldehyde from ASBReduced acetaldehyde, metals,naphthalene from LKReduced arsenic from SDTReduced metals from boilerIncreased releasetemperature for ASBIncreased stack velocity forRFDeleted acrolein, formaldehyde,acetaldehyde, naphthalene,methanol, 5 other HAPs fromSDTReduced acetaldehyde from O2delignificationDeleted HCE from bleach plantand formaldehyde from pulpdryerReduced acetaldehyde, formaldehyde,chloroform, methanol, and 16 otherHAPs from digester chip bin and LVHCIncreased stack height whenchanged release point typefor paper machinesIncreased stacktemperature for papermachines when changedrelease point typeIncreased stackvelocity/flow for papermachines when changedrelease point typeChanged release pointtype for paper machinesfrom fugitive to verticalpoint sourceDeleted records for NCGincinerator (includes metals,formaldehyde, naphthalene)Reduced acetaldehyde, formaldehyde,chloroform, methanol, and 16 otherHAPs from digester chip binDeleted records for causticizingmisc, lime slaker (includesacetaldehyde, chloroform,naphthalene, methanol)Deleted HCE from bleach plantDeleted HCE from BSW/HVLCDeleted records for causticizingmisc, lime slaker (includesacetaldehyde, chloroform,naphthalene)Reduced formaldehyde from EUBLT12 (Bleach Tower 2)Deleted formaldehyde from EUBLT22 (Bleach Tower 2) (to bereplaced with much lowerestimate for EU BLT14)B‐30NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI34030NEI8278NEI11610NEI6261NEI43472NEI33883NEI8186NEI26476NEI41565NEI40738NEI11251NEI11172**Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions Increased stack gas** **temperature Increased stack gas** **velocity or flow Deleted emission units Deleted HAPs Changed from fugitive to** **stack NEI revisions which may reduce risk** Increased stacktemperature for mechpulpingIncreased stackvelocity/flow for boilersDeleted undifferentiatedrecords for paper machine (tobe replaced)Increased stackvelocity/flow for greenliquor processing, blackliquor tanks, pulp storagewhen changed releasepoint typeDeleted HCE from bleach plantDeleted o‐cresol from bleachplant, green liquor processing,BSWDeleted o‐cresol from RFChanged release pointtype for green liquorprocessing, black liquortanks, pulp storageIncreased stack height forsec fiber pulping, papermachines, space heaterswhen changed release pointtypeIncreased stack temp forsec fiber pulping, papermachines, space heaterswhen changed releasepoint typeIncreased stackvelocity/flow for sec fiberpulping, paper machines,space heaters whenchanged release point typeDeleted records for papermachine (to be replaced)Changed release pointtype for sec fiber pulping,paper machines, spaceheatersReduced acetaldehyde, naphthalene,CS2, propionaldehyde from WWTReduced acetaldehyde, formaldehyde,naphthalene from WWTReduced acetaldehyde, formaldehyde,chloroform, methanol from LVHCDeleted records for causticizingmisc, lime slaker (includesacetaldehyde, chloroform,naphthalene)Reduced nickel from paper machineDeleted acetaldehyde,methanol from papermakingfugitivesIncreased stack height forpaper machinesIncreased fugitive areafor WWTDeleted undifferentiatedrecords for paper machines (tobe replaced)Deleted records for causticizingmisc, lime slakers (includesacetaldehyde, chloroform,methanol, naphthalene)Reduced acetaldehyde from WWTB‐31NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI54342NEI26581NEI34066NEI11367NEI18658NEI7181NEI34070NEI13340NEI26526NEI54400NEI8265NEI42341B**Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions Increased stack gas** **temperature Increased stack gas** **velocity or flow Deleted emission units Deleted HAPs Changed from fugitive to** **stack NEI revisions which may reduce risk** Increased stack height forcausticizing (lime mud filter,lime slaker), pulp storage, BLtanks, deckerIncreased stacktemperature forcausticizing, pulp storage,BL tanks, BSW, deckerwhen changed releasepoint typeIncreased stackvelocity/flow forcausticizing, pulp storage,BL tanks, BSW, deckerwhen changed releasepoint typeChanged release pointtype for causticizing, pulpstorage, BL tanks, BSW,decker from fugitive tostackDeleted HCE from bleach plantand 2‐methylnaphthalene fromSDTsIncreased fugitive areafor WWTDeleted HCE from bleach plantReduced naphthalene, 10 other HAPsfrom bleach plantDeleted HCE from BSW, bleachplant, knotters, BLO unitDeleted HCE from bleach plant,LVHC, HVLC, RF, SDT, LKIncreased stack height forpaper machine whenreplaced paper machinerecords with separatewet/dry end recordsIncreased stackvelocity/flow for papermachine when replacedpaper machine recordswith separate wet/dry endrecordsDeleted undifferentiatedrecords for paper machine (tobe replaced)Deleted records for causticizingmisc, lime slaker (includesacetaldehyde, chloroform,methanol, naphthalene, 15other HAPs)Reduced acetaldehyde, methanol frompaper machineDeleted HCE from bleach plantand toluene‐2,4‐diamine fromBL tanksB‐32NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI33025 orNEW71411NEI33023NEI46814NEI6273NEI46599NEI8619NEI42254**Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions Increased stack gas** **temperature Increased stack gas** **velocity or flow Deleted emission units Deleted HAPs Changed from fugitive to** **stack NEI revisions which may reduce risk** Deleted records for causticizingmisc, lime slaker (includesacetaldehyde, chloroform,methanol, naphthalene)Reduced metals emissions from boilers Increased stack temp forstock chests when changedrelease point typeIncreased stackvelocity/flow for stockchests when changedrelease point typeDeleted chloroform, 11 otherchlorinated HAPs from BSW,paper machine, sec fiberpulping, NCG incin, pulpstorage, tall oilDeleted biphenyl from papermachineDeleted o‐cresol from greenliquor processingDeleted Be, Se from boilerChanged release pointtype for stock chestsReduced acetaldehyde from WWTDeleted records for non‐operational boilerDeleted carbon tetrachloridefrom paper machines, pulpdryerReduced acetaldehyde, chloroform,formaldehyde, methanol, naphthalene,27 other HAPs from BSW, BL tanksIncreased stacktemperature for BSW, SOG,pulp storage, O2delignification, black liquortanks, causticizing, bleachplant, knotter, sec fiberpulping when changedrelease point typeIncreased stackvelocity/flow for BSW,SOG, pulp storage, O2delignification, black liquortanks, causticizing, bleachplant, knotter, sec fiberpulping when changedrelease point typeChanged release pointtype for BSW and BLtanks from fugitive tovertical with rain capDeleted records for causticizingmisc, lime slaker (includesacetaldehyde, chloroform,methanol, naphthalene)Increased stack height forevaporator/ concentratorwhen changed release pointtypeIncreased stack temp forevaporator/ concentratorwhen changed releasepoint typeIncreased stackvelocity/flow forevaporator/ concentrator,green liquor processingwhen changed releasepoint typeDeleted records for boilers (tobe replaced)Deleted biphenyl from papermachinesDeleted o‐cresol from bleachplant, green liquor processing,RFDeleted o‐xylene from tall oil,screens, LK, RFChanged release pointtype for evaporator/concentrator, greenliquor processingB‐33NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI47074NEI26491NEI8261NEI26309NEI45206NEI41252NEI7559NEI33013NEI11461NEI33945NEI40554NEI26504**Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions Increased stack gas** **temperature Increased stack gas** **velocity or flow Deleted emission units Deleted HAPs Changed from fugitive to** **stack NEI revisions which may reduce risk** Increased stack height forpaper machines whenreplaced fugitive papermachine records with stackrecordsIncreased stacktemperature for papermachines when replacedfugitive paper machinerecords with stack recordsIncreased stackvelocity/flow for papermachines when replacedfugitive paper machinerecords with stack recordsDeleted fugitive records forcausticizing, paper machines (tobe replaced)Changed release pointtype for causticizing,paper machines fromfugitive to stackDeleted records for PB5 andPB7 (to be replaced)Deleted 11 chlorinated HAPsfrom tall oil, pulp storage, blackliquor tanks, BSW, LVHC,screens, sec fiber pulping, papermachinesDeleted biphenyl from sec fiberpulping, paper machineDeleted o‐cresol from BSWIncreased fugitive areafor WWT (ASB)Deleted HCE from bleach plantDeleted HCE from bleach plant,pulp storageDeleted records for causticizingmisc, lime slaker (includesacetaldehyde, chloroform,methanol, naphthalene)Deleted records for secondaryclarifier and boiler (to bereplaced)Deleted biphenyl from sec fiberpulping and paper machinesIncreased stacktemperature for HD/LDpulp storage when changedrelease point typeIncreased stackvelocity/flow for HD/LDpulp storage when changedrelease point typeChanged release pointtype for HD/LD pulpstorage from fugitive tohorizontal point sourceDeleted records for RFs, SDTs(being replaced with new units,emissions data for which willnot be ready until Sept 2012)B‐34NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI18335NEI11338NEI46852NEI18390NEI23NEI42341ANEI46817NEI47077NEI26471NEI33103NEI42689NEI46866NEI42486NEI6175NEI26382NEI42329NEI42338NEI46931NEI9201NEI41628NEI12411**Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions Increased stack gas** **temperature Increased stack gas** **velocity or flow Deleted emission units Deleted HAPs Changed from fugitive to** **stack NEI revisions which may reduce risk** Deleted records for causticizingmisc, lime slaker (includesacetaldehyde, chloroform,methanol, naphthalene)Deleted HCE from bleach plantReduced acetaldehyde from BLO unitand nickel from LKDeleted naphthalene from BLOunitReduced chloroform from WWT coolingtowers, primary clarifierReduced nickel from boilerDeleted HCE from bleach plantsReduced acetaldehyde, chloroform,formaldehyde, 13 other HAPs fromWWTDeleted records for causticizingmisc, lime slaker (includesacetaldehyde, chloroform,methanol, naphthalene)Deleted HCE from bleach plantB‐35NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI18338NEI18357NEI26514NEI34064NEI12492NEI33118NEI18657NEIMA10626NEI18347NEI208NEI46760NEI43202NEI8601NEI18373NEI33887NEI42317NEI26487**Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions Increased stack gas** **temperature Increased stack gas** **velocity or flow Deleted emission units Deleted HAPs Changed from fugitive to** **stack NEI revisions which may reduce risk** Reduced acetaldehyde, chloroform,formaldehyde, naphthalene fromprimary clarifierDeleted 19 HAPs from primaryclarifier (including cumene, HCE,methanol)Deleted HCE from bleach plantsIncreased fugitive areafor WWTP 1‐4Deleted records for causticizingmisc, lime slaker (includesacetaldehyde, chloroform,methanol, naphthalene)Deleted HCE from bleach plantIncreased fugitive areafor ASBDeleted records for primary/secondary clarifier, ASB (to bereplaced)Deleted 9 chlorinated HAPsfrom HVLCDeleted biphenyl from sec fiberpulpingDeleted 11 chlorinated HAPsfrom SDTDeleted records for causticizingmisc, lime slaker (includesacetaldehyde, chloroform,methanol, naphthalene)Deleted HCE from bleach plantsReduced acetaldehyde from WWTIncreased stackvelocity/flow forgreen/white liquorprocessing, pulp storage,black liquor tanks, limeslaker when changedrelease point typeDeleted 12 chlorinated HAPsfrom digester, BSW, tall oil, pulpstorage, evaporator/concentratorDeleted o‐xylene from pulpstorageChanged release pointtype for green/whiteliquor processing, pulpstorage, black liquortanks, lime slakerB‐36NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI45474NEI42710NEI8122NEI42730NEIWI4050324NEI33981NEI42410NEIMN14904NEI39968NEI13216NEI12368NEI26506NEI11108NEI42495NEI12980NEI33104NEI42800NEI42690NEI18652NEI35908NEIWI7500086 &NEIWIT$8597NEIWI0793640**Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions Increased stack gas** **temperature Increased stack gas** **velocity or flow Deleted emission units Deleted HAPs Changed from fugitive to** **stack NEI revisions which may reduce risk** Deleted records for ClO2 mixer(includes acetaldehyde,chlorine, chloroform,formaldehyde, methanol)Deleted HCE from bleach plantsDeleted o‐xylene from pulpstorage, RFReduced acetaldehyde from dryformerIncreased stack height forboilersIncreased stackvelocity/flow for boilersDeleted duplicate HAP datafrom boilers (includesacetaldehyde, formaldehyde,naphthalene, metals, and 22other HAPs)Increased velocity forBleach Tower 2Reduced arsenic from boilerDeleted records for causticizingmisc, lime slaker, green liquorprocessing (includesacetaldehyde, chloroform,methanol, naphthalene)Deleted HCE from bleach plantB‐37NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI7933NEI8177NEI6284NEI46750NEI34020NEI11602NEIPA1013489NEI2INT16350NEITN1050093NEI11645NEI11600NEI36019NEICT3102NEIWI4710355NEI42961NEW73505NEI40488NEIGAT$3911NEI33866NEI7106NEI33950NEI40720**Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions Increased stack gas** **temperature Increased stack gas** **velocity or flow Deleted emission units Deleted HAPs Changed from fugitive to** **stack NEI revisions which may reduce risk** Increased stackvelocity/flow for greenliquor processing whenchanged release point typeDeleted chloroform and 10other chlorinated HAPs fromdigester, pulp storage, LVHC,BSW, sec fiber pulpingDeleted o‐cresol from BSW,green liquor processesDeleted o‐xylene from pulpstorageDeleted biphenyl from papermachineChanged release pointtype for green liquorprocessingB‐38NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI26304NEINY5532600NEI40553NEINY5533400NEI2WAT18798NEI42385NEIGAT$3909NEI33072NEI33986NEIMA131179NEIWA0270002**171 Increased release height Increased fugitive area Reduced emissions** **Increased stack gas temperature** **Increased stack gas velocity or flow Deleted emission units Deleted HAPs** **Changed from fugitive to stack** **NEI revisions which may reduce risk**Deleted 4 chlorinated HAPsfrom pulp storageDeleted biphenyl, methylenechloride from paper machineand sec fiber pulpingDeleted o‐xylene from pulpstorage**13 6 36 14 21 32 47 16**B‐39NEI32869ANEI18334NEI40648NEI40282NEIWI7720116,NEI46739, &NEI42963NEIME0250002NEI42695**Survey NEI Changed lat/longs** **Changed fugitive angle Changed stack diameter** **Recommended change to** **receptor location Other**No Emissions reduction/ removal of risk driver pollutants frommultiple sources expected to reduce risk for subpart Scategory309 (33) 11%No Changes in release point type and stack parameters, removalof some emission units, and net emissions reduction/removal of risk driver/other pollutants expected to reducerisk for subpart S category2,493 (2,030) 81%No No NEI revisions receivedNo Net emissions reduction/removal of risk driver/otherpollutants expected to reduce risk for subpart S category;also, mill provided a contemporary risk assessment using site‐specific meteorological data which showed reduced risk532 (7.7) 1.4%YesNo Net emissions reduction/removal of risk driver/otherpollutants for entire facility expected to reduce risk forsubpart S category; large emissions reduction for higher‐riskNEIWI7720116; minimal net emissions increase in emissionsfor low‐risk NEI467391,014 (831) 82%Changed lat/longs forpressurizedgroundwood emissionunits and boilersIncreased stack diameterfor boilersYesNo Changes in release point type and stack parameters and netemissions reduction of risk driver/other pollutants expectedto reduce risk for subpart S category49 (20) 41%Changed lat/longs fordigester, decker, andClO2 generatorYesNo Removal of some risk driver pollutants expected to reducerisk for subpart S category86 (0.09) 0.1%**Net change in emissions for** **subpart S category** **% change in emissions for** **subpart S category** **Reasons Remodel?** **NEI revisions with unknown effect Baseline** **emissions for subpart S** **category**B‐40NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI41552NEI6057NEI47091NEI40600NEI46835NEI43207NEI13363NEI41314NEI42211NEI7104**Changed lat/longs Changed fugitive** **angle Changed stack diameter Recommended** **change to receptor location Other** **Net change in emissions for** **subpart S category** **% change in emissions for** **subpart S category** **Reasons Remodel?** **NEI revisions with unknown effect Baseline** **emissions for subpart S** **category**Changed lat/long forASBChanged stack diameter forpaper machines (3 uniquerecords) and BL tanks (2unique records)Yes Changed SCC from30700122 (causticizingmisc) to 30700132(green liquorprocessing)No Changes in release point type and stack parameters, removalof risk driver pollutant from one source, and net emissionsreduction of risk driver pollutant expected to reduce risk forsubpart S category446 (39) 8.8%No No NEI revisions receivedChanged max hourlyemissions for RF, SDT,LK, boilersNo Removal of risk driver pollutant from multiple sourcesexpected to reduce risk for subpart S category398 (20) 5.0%No Replacement of fugitive records with stack records andemissions reduction of risk driver/other pollutants expectedto reduce risk for subpart S category237 (113) 48%No No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo Emissions reduction of risk driver pollutants expected toreduce risk for subpart S category175 (34) 19%Changed lat/long forWWTYesNo Removal of some emission units and risk driver/otherpollutants from multiple sources expected to reduce risk forsubpart S category475 (86) 18%Changed lat/longs forOCC plant and papermachineChanged fugitiveangles for OCCplant and papermachineNo No revisions except minor changes to lat/longs and fugitiveangles, so risk for subpart S category expected to beunchanged363 0 0%No Changes to stack heights expected to reduce risk for subpartS category17 0 0%B‐41NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI40686NEI33135 & NEI706NEI41599NEI8178NEI8196NEI6450NEI26495**Changed lat/longs Changed fugitive** **angle Changed stack diameter Recommended** **change to receptor location Other** **Net change in emissions for** **subpart S category** **% change in emissions for** **subpart S category** **Reasons Remodel?** **NEI revisions with unknown effect Baseline** **emissions for subpart S** **category**Changed lat/long forWWTYesNo Removal of some risk driver/other pollutants from multiplesources expected to reduce risk for subpart S category73 (19) 26%No Changes in release point type and stack parameters, removalof emission unit, and emissions reduction of risk driverpollutant expected to reduce risk for subpart S category172 (94) 55%No Net emissions reduction/removal of risk driver/otherpollutants from multiple sources expected to reduce risk forsubpart S category362 (60) 17%Changed max hourlyemissionsNo Net emissions reduction/removal of risk driver/otherpollutants from multiple sources expected to reduce risk forsubpart S category185 (129) 70%Changed lat/long forlime mud filterIncreased stack diameterfor lime slakerNo Change in release point type and stack parameters andemissions reduction of risk driver/other pollutants expectedto reduce risk for subpart S category568 (34) 6.0%Changed lat/longs forWWT, paper machinesChanged fugitiveangle for WWT,paper machinesNoChange in fugitive parameters and net emissions reduction ofrisk driver pollutants expected to reduce risk for subpart Scategory137 (8.4) 6.1%YesNo No revisions except suggested change in receptor location,so risk for subpart S category expected to be unchanged643 0 0%B‐42NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI42357NEI18660NEIIL0215971NEI45182NEI47104NEI12407NEI40247NEI759NEI8560NEI42482NEIVA00022**Changed lat/longs Changed fugitive** **angle Changed stack diameter Recommended** **change to receptor location Other** **Net change in emissions for** **subpart S category** **% change in emissions for** **subpart S category** **Reasons Remodel?** **NEI revisions with unknown effect Baseline** **emissions for subpart S** **category**Changed lat/longs forASB, RF, SDT, LK, boilerDecreased stack diameterfor RFNo Change in release temperature and emissions reduction ofrisk driver pollutant expected to reduce risk for subpart Scategory153 (3.2) 2.1%YesNo Emissions reduction/ removal of risk driver pollutants frommultiple sources expected to reduce risk for subpart Scategory1,626 (10) 0.6%NoNo NEI revisions receivedChanged lat/long forWWTNo Emissions reduction of risk driver/other pollutants expectedto reduce risk for subpart S category242 (65) 27%No Changes in release point type and stack parameters expectedto reduce risk for subpart S category177 0 0%No Removal of emission unit expected to reduce risk for subpartS category25 (7.1) 29%No Removal of some emission units and emissions reduction/removal of risk driver/other pollutants expected to reducerisk for subpart S category1,263 (170) 13%No Removal of risk driver pollutant expected to reduce risk forsubpart S category641 (0.06) 0.009%Changed lat/long forWWTChanged fugitiveangle for WWTYesNo Removal of some emission units expected to reduce risk forsubpart S category893 (64) 7.2%No Net emissions reduction of risk driver pollutant expected toreduce risk for subpart S category73 (13) 18%No No NEI revisions receivedB‐43NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI34030NEI8278NEI11610NEI6261NEI43472NEI33883NEI8186NEI26476NEI41565NEI40738NEI11251NEI11172**Changed lat/longs Changed fugitive** **angle Changed stack diameter Recommended** **change to receptor location Other** **Net change in emissions for** **subpart S category** **% change in emissions for** **subpart S category** **Reasons Remodel?** **NEI revisions with unknown effect Baseline** **emissions for subpart S** **category**Changed lat/long forpaper machine whenreplaced paper machinerecords with separatewet/dry end recordsChanged lat/longs forboilersNo Change in paper machine configuration (to include wet/dryend) and change in stack parameter expected to reduce riskfor subpart S category55 0 0%Increased stack diameterfor green liquor processing,black liquor tanks, pulpstorage when changedrelease point typeChanged pollutant codefor m,p‐cresolNo Changes in release point type and stack parameters andremoval of risk driver/other pollutants from multiple sourcesexpected to reduce risk for subpart S category371 (17) 4.6%Increased stack diameterfor sec fiber pulping, papermachines, space heaterswhen changed releasepoint typeNo Changes to release point type and parameters expected toreduce risk for subpart S category3 0 0%No Emissions reduction of HAP driver/other pollutants expectedto reduce risk for subpart S category535 (4.6) 0.9%NoNo NEI revisions receivedChanged fugitiveangle for WWTYesNo Emissions reduction of HAP driver pollutants expected toreduce risk for subpart S category88 (7.2) 8.1%No Removal of some emission units and dmissions reduction ofHAP driver pollutants expected to reduce risk for subpart Scategory351 (98) 28%No No NEI revisions receivedNoNo NEI revisions receivedYesNo Removal of some risk driver pollutants expected to reducerisk for subpart S category60 (58) 97%Changed lat/long forWWTNo Changes in stack/ fugitive parameters and removal of someemission units expected to reduce risk for subpart S category1,448 (54) 3.7%Changed lat/long forWWTChanged fugitiveangle for WWTNo Emissions reduction of risk driver pollutant expected toreduce risk for subpart S category286 (20) 7.0%B‐44NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI54342NEI26581NEI34066NEI11367NEI18658NEI7181NEI34070NEI13340NEI26526NEI54400NEI8265NEI42341B**Changed lat/longs Changed fugitive** **angle Changed stack diameter Recommended** **change to receptor location Other** **Net change in emissions for** **subpart S category** **% change in emissions for** **subpart S category** **Reasons Remodel?** **NEI revisions with unknown effect Baseline** **emissions for subpart S** **category**Increased stack diameterfor causticizing, pulpstorage, BL tanks, BSW,decker when changedrelease point typeNo Changes in release point type and stack parameters expectedto reduce risk for subpart S category348 0 0%Changed pollutant fromhexachloro‐benzene tohexachlorocyclo‐pentadiene for SDTsNo Removal of risk driver pollutant expected to reduce risk forsubpart S category219 (6.2) 2.8%Changed lat/long forWWTNo Change in fugitive parameters and removal of risk driverpollutant expected to reduce risk for subpart S category162 (6.2) 3.8%No No NEI revisions receivedNo Emissions reduction/removal of risk driver/other pollutantsexpected to reduce risk for subpart S category1,796 (14) 0.8%No Removal of risk driver pollutant from multiple sourcesexpected to reduce risk for subpart S category115 (2.9) 2.5%Changed lat/long forpaper machine whenreplaced paper machinerecords with separatewet/dry end recordsNo Change in paper machine configuration (to include wet/dryend) and stack parameters, removal of some emission units,and net emissions reduction expected to reduce risk forsubpart S category581 (32) 5.4%No No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedChanged lat/longs forpulp oper, papermachines, hot wateraccum drainNo Emissions reduction of risk driver pollutants expected toreduce risk for subpart S category49 (39) 78%No Removal of risk driver/ other pollutants expected to reducerisk for subpart S category804 (0.25) 0.03%No No NEI revisions receivedB‐45NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI33025 orNEW71411NEI33023NEI46814NEI6273NEI46599NEI8619NEI42254**Changed lat/longs Changed fugitive** **angle Changed stack diameter Recommended** **change to receptor location Other** **Net change in emissions for** **subpart S category** **% change in emissions for** **subpart S category** **Reasons Remodel?** **NEI revisions with unknown effect Baseline** **emissions for subpart S** **category**No Removal of some emission units expected to reduce risk forsubpart S category343 (34) 9.9%Reduced fugitiveangle for primaryclarifierIncreased fugitiveangle for WWTPIncreased diameter forstock chests when changedrelease point typeNo Change in release point type and stack parameters and netemissions reductions/ removal of biphenyl, o‐cresol,chloroform, and other chlorinated HAPs expected to reducerisk for subpart S category273 (8.1) 3.0%No No NEI revisions receivedChanged lat/longs forgroundwood ops, NDCERF, and boilerYesNo Minimal net emissions increase for subpart S, so any increasein risk for subpart S category expected to be minor; also,cancer MIR for subpart S is ~1E‐6, and non‐cancer HI andHQ(REL)<<1, so any increase in risk is not expected to resultin a high risk result115 3.4 ‐2.9%YesNo Changes in release point type and stack parameters andemissions reductions of risk driver/other pollutants expectedto reduce risk for subpart S category245 (16) 6.5%No Removal of some emission units expected to reduce risk forsubpart S category498 (33) 6.6%Increased stack diameterfor evaporator/concentrator, green liquorprocessing when changedrelease point typeNo Changes in release point type and stack parameters andremoval of biphenyl, o‐cresol, and o‐xylene from multiplesources expected to reduce risk for subpart S category246 (3.0) 1.2%B‐46NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI47074NEI26491NEI8261NEI26309NEI45206NEI41252NEI7559NEI33013NEI11461NEI33945NEI40554NEI26504**Changed lat/longs Changed fugitive** **angle Changed stack diameter Recommended** **change to receptor location Other** **Net change in emissions for** **subpart S category** **% change in emissions for** **subpart S category** **Reasons Remodel?** **NEI revisions with unknown effect Baseline** **emissions for subpart S** **category**Changed lat/longs forpaper machinesIncreased stack diameterfor paper machines whenreplaced fugitive papermachine records with stackrecordsChanged BSW to papermachine (SCC changed)No Changes in release point type and stack parameters andreplacement of fugitive records with lower‐emitting stackrecords expected to reduce risk for subpart S category261 (24) 9.2%No No NEI revisions receivedNo Removal of biphenyl, o‐cresol, and chlorinated HAPs frommultiple sources expected to reduce risk for subpart Scategory318 (21) 6.5%Changed lat/longs forWWT (ASB,up/downstream ditches)Changed fugitiveangle for WWT(upstream ditch)No Change in fugitive parameters and removal of risk driverpollutant expected to reduce risk for subpart S category349 (2.1) 0.6%No Removal of risk driver pollutant from multiple sourcesexpected to reduce risk for subpart S category276 (9.4) 3.4%No No NEI revisions receivedNoNo NEI revisions receivedNo Removal of some emission units expected to reduce risk forsubpart S category1,832 (65) 3.6%Changed lat/longs forprimary/ secondaryclarifiersChanged fugitiveangle forsecondary clarifierNo Removal of biphenyl from multiple sources expected toreduce risk for subpart S category95 (1.2) 1.3%No No NEI revisions receivedIncreased stack diameterfor HD/LD pulp storagewhen changed releasepoint typeNo Changes to release point type and stack parametersexpected to reduce risk for subpart S category74 0 0%No No revisions to subpart S sources, so risk for subpart Scategory expected to be unchanged544 0 0%B‐47NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI18335NEI11338NEI46852NEI18390NEI23NEI42341ANEI46817NEI47077NEI26471NEI33103NEI42689NEI46866NEI42486NEI6175NEI26382NEI42329NEI42338NEI46931NEI9201NEI41628NEI12411**Changed lat/longs Changed fugitive** **angle Changed stack diameter Recommended** **change to receptor location Other** **Net change in emissions for** **subpart S category** **% change in emissions for** **subpart S category** **Reasons Remodel?** **NEI revisions with unknown effect Baseline** **emissions for subpart S** **category**No Removal of some emission units and risk driver pollutantexpected to reduce risk for subpart S category751 (44) 5.8%Changed lat/longs forWWT, BLO unitSplit up BLO unitemissionsChange release pointtype for BLO unit fromvertical to vertical withrain capNo No revisions to subpart S sources, so risk for subpart Scategory expected to be unchanged389 0 0%No No NEI revisions receivedNoNo NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo Net emissions reduction of risk driver pollutant expected toreduce risk for subpart S category88 (12.4) 14.1%No Removal of risk driver pollutant expected to reduce risk forsubpart S category181 (0.8) 0.4%No No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNoNo NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo Emissions reductions of risk driver/other pollutants expectedto reduce risk for subpart S category140 (37) 26%NoNo NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo Removal of some emission units and risk driver pollutantexpected to reduce risk for subpart S category1,989 (82) 4.1%No No NEI revisions receivedB‐48NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI18338NEI18357NEI26514NEI34064NEI12492NEI33118NEI18657NEIMA10626NEI18347NEI208NEI46760NEI43202NEI8601NEI18373NEI33887NEI42317NEI26487**Changed lat/longs Changed fugitive** **angle Changed stack diameter Recommended** **change to receptor location Other** **Net change in emissions for** **subpart S category** **% change in emissions for** **subpart S category** **Reasons Remodel?** **NEI revisions with unknown effect Baseline** **emissions for subpart S** **category**No Large net emissions increase for subpart S; however, 98% ofthe added emissions is methanol (only 5.7 tons attributed toother risk driver pollutants); also cancer MIR for subpart S is<<1E‐6, and non‐cancer HI and HQ(REL)<1, so any increase inrisk is not expected to result in a high risk result155 308 ‐199%No Removal of risk driver pollutant expected to reduce risk forsubpart S category365 (5.1) 1.4%Changed lat/longs forWWTP1‐4,6Changed fugitiveangle forWWTP1,6No Changes in fugitive parameters and removal of someemission units and risk driver pollutant expected to reducerisk for subpart S category737 (90) 12%No No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNoNo NEI revisions receivedChanged fugitiveangle for primary/secondaryclarifier, ASBNo Changes in fugitive parameters and removal of biphenyl andchlorinated HAPs from multiple sources expected to reducerisk for subpart S category234 (0.002) 0.0009%No No NEI revisions receivedNo Removal of some emission units and risk driver pollutantexpected to reduce risk for subpart S category262 (93) 36%NoNo NEI revisions receivedNoNo NEI revisions receivedNo Emissions reduction of risk driver pollutant expected toreduce risk for subpart S category748 (12) 1.6%NoNo NEI revisions receivedIncreased stack diameterfor green/white liquorprocessing, pulp storage,black liquor tanks, limeslaker when changedrelease point typeChanged SCC from30700122 (causticizingmisc) to 30700132(green liquorprocessing)No Changes in release point type and stack parameters andremoval of o‐xylene and chlorinated HAPs from multiplesources expected to reduce risk for subpart S category227 (4.9) 2.2%No No NEI revisions receivedB‐49NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI45474NEI42710NEI8122NEI42730NEIWI4050324NEI33981NEI42410NEIMN14904NEI39968NEI13216NEI12368NEI26506NEI11108NEI42495NEI12980NEI33104NEI42800NEI42690NEI18652NEI35908NEIWI7500086 &NEIWIT$8597NEIWI0793640**Changed lat/longs Changed fugitive** **angle Changed stack diameter Recommended** **change to receptor location Other** **Net change in emissions for** **subpart S category** **% change in emissions for** **subpart S category** **Reasons Remodel?** **NEI revisions with unknown effect Baseline** **emissions for subpart S** **category**Changed fugitiveangle for WWTNo Removal of emission unit and risk driver/other pollutantsfrom multiple sources expected to reduce risk for subpart Scategory600 (7.2) 1.2%NoNo NEI revisions receivedNoNo NEI revisions receivedNoNo NEI revisions receivedNo Small net emissions increase for subpart S; however, theadded pollutant (4.8 tons) is vinyl acetate (not risk driver),while the reduced pollutant (1.8 tons) is acetaldehyde (riskdriver); also cancer MIR for subpart S is <<1E‐6, and non‐cancer HI and HQ(REL)<<1, so any increase in risk is notexpected to result in a high risk result8 3.0 ‐39%Changed lat/longs forboilersIncreased stack diametersfor boilersNo No revisions to subpart S sources, so risk for subpart Scategory expected to be unchanged5 0 0%No No NEI revisions receivedNoNo NEI revisions receivedNoNo NEI revisions receivedNoNo NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNoNo NEI revisions receivedIncreased diameter forBleach Tower 1; reduceddiameter for Bleach Tower2No Minor changes in stack parameters for two release pointsexpected to have minimal impact on risk for subpart Scategory76 0 0%No No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNoNo NEI revisions receivedNo No revisions to subpart S sources, so risk for subpart Scategory expected to be unchanged639 0 0%No Removal of some emission units and risk driver pollutantexpected to reduce risk for subpart S category82 (26) 32%No No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedB‐50NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI7933NEI8177NEI6284NEI46750NEI34020NEI11602NEIPA1013489NEI2INT16350NEITN1050093NEI11645NEI11600NEI36019NEICT3102NEIWI4710355NEI42961NEW73505NEI40488NEIGAT$3911NEI33866NEI7106NEI33950NEI40720**Changed lat/longs Changed fugitive** **angle Changed stack diameter Recommended** **change to receptor location Other** **Net change in emissions for** **subpart S category** **% change in emissions for** **subpart S category** **Reasons Remodel?** **NEI revisions with unknown effect Baseline** **emissions for subpart S** **category**Changed lat/long forpulp storageIncreased stack diameterfor green liquor processingwhen changed releasepoint typeNo Changes in release point type and stack parameters andremoval of o‐cresol, o‐xylene, chloroform, and otherchlorinated HAPs from multiple sources expected to reducerisk for subpart S category192 (11) 5.9%NoNo NEI revisions receivedNoNo NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNoNo NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNoNo NEI revisions received; mill closed in Feb 2012No No NEI revisions receivedNoNo NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNoNo NEI revisions receivedNoNo NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedB‐51NEI32869A**Survey NEI**NEI26304NEINY5532600NEI40553NEINY5533400NEI2WAT18798NEI42385NEIGAT$3909NEI33072NEI33986NEIMA131179NEIWA0270002**171 Changed lat/longs** **Changed fugitive angle Changed stack diameter** **Recommended change to** **receptor location Other Net change in** **emissions for subpart S** **category % change in** **emissions for subpart S** **category Reasons** **Remodel? NEI revisions with unknown effect** **Baseline emissions for** **subpart S category** No Removal of biphenyl, o‐xylene, methylene chloride, andother chlorinated HAP from multiple sources expected toreduce risk for subpart S category27 (1.6) 5.9%No No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No NEI revisions receivedNo No HAP data for subpart S sources to modelNo No HAP data for subpart S sources to modelNo No HAP data for subpart S sources to modelNo Not modeled**25 11 15 13 8 171 34,459 (4,579) 13%** B‐52