Affirmed and Opinion Filed June 19, 2014 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01483-CR 

No. 05-13-01484-CR 

No. 05-13-01485-CR 

RICHARD SAMUEL MORALES, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-58307-I, F10-59679-I, F10-60886-I 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Moseley, O’Neill, and FitzGerald 

Opinion by Justice FitzGerald 

Richard Samuel Morales appeals from the adjudication of his guilt for assault resulting in 

bodily injury and involving family violence, having a previous conviction for assault involving 

family violence; aggravated sexual assault with a deadly weapon; and aggravated kidnapping 

with a deadly weapon. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. §§ 20.04(b), 22.01(a), 22.021(a)(1)(A)(i) 

(West 2011 & Supp. 2013); TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. §§ 71.0021, 71.005 (West 2008 & Supp. 

2013). The trial court assessed punishment at ten years’ imprisonment on the assault conviction 

and thirty years’ imprisonment on the aggravated sexual assault and aggravated kidnapping 
convictions. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeals are 

wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in 

effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. 

Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised 

appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. 

 We have reviewed the records and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 

827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the 

appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the records that might arguably 

support the appeals. 

 We affirm the trial court’s judgments. 

Do Not Publish 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47 

1301483F.U05 /Kerry P. FitzGerald/ 

KERRY P. FITZGERALD 

JUSTICE 
Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

RICHARD SAMUEL MORALES, 

Appellant 

No. 05-13-01483-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 Appeal from the Criminal District Court 

No. 2 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 

F10-58307-I). 

Opinion delivered by Justice FitzGerald, 

Justices Moseley and O’Neill participating. 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 

Judgment entered June 19, 2014 

/Kerry P. FitzGerald/ 

KERRY P. FITZGERALD 

JUSTICE 
Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

RICHARD SAMUEL MORALES, 

Appellant 

No. 05-13-01484-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 Appeal from the Criminal District Court 

No. 2 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 

F10-59679-I). 

Opinion delivered by Justice FitzGerald, 

Justices Moseley and O’Neill participating. 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 

Judgment entered June 19, 2014 

/Kerry P. FitzGerald/ 

KERRY P. FITZGERALD 

JUSTICE 
Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

RICHARD SAMUEL MORALES, 

Appellant 

No. 05-13-01485-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 Appeal from the Criminal District Court 

No. 2 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 

F10-60886-I). 

Opinion delivered by Justice FitzGerald, 

Justices Moseley and O’Neill participating. 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 

Judgment entered June 19, 2014 

/Kerry P. FitzGerald/ 

KERRY P. FITZGERALD 

JUSTICE