alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 668.98 Removal of limitation. ( a ) An institution whose participation in a Title IV, HEA program has been limited may not apply for removal of the limitation before the expiration of 12 months from the effective date of the limitation.
( b ) A third-party servicer whose eligibility to contract with any institution to administer any aspect of the institution's participation in a Title IV, HEA program has been limited may request removal of the limitation.
( c ) The institution or servicer may not apply for removal of the limitation before the later of the expiration of— ( 1 ) Twelve months from the effective date of the limitation; or
( 2 ) A debarment or suspension under Executive Order 12549 (3 CFR, 1986 Comp., p. 189) or the Federal Acquisition Regulations, 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4.
( d ) If the institution or servicer requests removal of the limitation, the request must be in writing and show that the institution or servicer, as applicable, has corrected the violation or violations on which the limitation was based.
( e ) No later than 60 days after the Secretary receives the request, the Secretary responds to the institution or servicer— ( 1 ) Granting its request;
( 2 ) Denying its request; or
( 3 ) Granting the request subject to other limitation or limitations.
( f ) If the Secretary denies the request or establishes other limitations, the Secretary grants the institution or servicer, upon the institution's or servicer's request, an opportunity to show cause why the participation or eligibility, as applicable, should be fully reinstated.
( g ) The institution's or servicer's request for an opportunity to show cause does not waive— ( 1 ) The institution's right to participate in any or all Title IV, HEA programs if it complies with the continuing limitation or limitations pending the outcome of the opportunity to show cause; and
( 2 ) The servicer's right to contract with any institution to administer any aspect of the institution's participation in any Title IV, HEA program, if the servicer complies with the continuing limitation pending the outcome of the opportunity to show cause.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1094; E.O. 12549 (3 CFR, 1986 Comp., p. 189), 12689 (3 CFR, 1989 Comp., p. 235))
[59 FR 22451, Apr. 29, 1994. Redesignated at 82 FR 6257, Jan. 19, 2017]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO THE DOMESTIC 

RELATIONS PROCEDURAL RULES 

COMMITTEE 

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 730

CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of February, 2022, Kenneth J. Horoho, Jr., Esquire, 

Allegheny County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Domestic Relations 

Procedural Rules Committee for a term of three years, commencing April 1, 2022.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE  SHEET OF HFAR REACH  HOLDINGS  LTD. AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE RELATED
STATEMENTS  OF  OPERATIONS  AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS  THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.00)



</TABLE>
§ 34.13 Conduct of a hearing. ( a ) ( 1 ) A hearing official conducts any hearing under this part.
( 2 ) The hearing official may be any qualified employee of the Department whom the Department designates to conduct the hearing.
( b ) ( 1 ) The hearing official conducts any hearing as an informal proceeding.
( 2 ) A witness in an oral hearing must testify under oath or affirmation.
( 3 ) The hearing official maintains a summary record of any hearing.
( c ) Before the hearing official considers evidence we obtain that was not included in the debt records available for inspection when we sent notice of proposed garnishment, we notify you that additional evidence has become available, may be considered by the hearing official, and is available for inspection or copying.
( d ) The hearing official considers any objection you raise and evidence you submit— ( 1 ) In or with the request for a hearing;
( 2 ) During an oral hearing;
( 3 ) By the date that we consider, under § 34.9(e), that a request for an oral hearing has been withdrawn; or
( 4 ) Within a period we set, ordinarily not to exceed seven business days, after— ( i ) We provide you access to our records regarding the debt, if you requested access to records within 20 days after the date of the notice under § 34.4;
( ii ) We notify you that we have obtained and intend to consider additional evidence;
( iii ) You request an extension of time in order to submit specific relevant evidence that you identify to us in the request; or
( iv ) We notify you that we deny your request for an oral hearing.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3720D)
Order filed, January 4, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-01108-CR

____________

EX PARTE GLENFORD ROBERT MCCALLUM, Appellant

On Appeal from the 344th District Court

Chambers County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11924-A

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due December 28, 2012. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Rossana Bobbitt, the official court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
[No. 8313.

*En Bane.*

March 24, 1910.]

#### The State of Washington, *on the Relation of the Puget Sound Realty Associates, Plaintiff,*v. The Superior Court for King County, *Respondent.**1*

Application for a writ of certiorari to review an order of the superior court for King county, Gay, J., entered September 20, 1909.

Denied.

*Shank & Smith*and *Hughes, McMicken, Dovell & Ramsey,*for relator.

*Charles E. Shepard*and *W. H. Bissell Thomas,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 107 Pac. 833.

Per Curiam.

The question involved in this application is the same as that involved in the case of *State ex rel. Seattle General Contract Co. v. Superior Court,*56 Wash. 649, 106 Pac. 150, where this court held that certiorari would not lie to review an order made in a cause directing an inspection of documents in the possession of an opposing party. Relator’s application is therefore denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 460

 475

 499

 482

 466

 492

 509

 473

 440

 421

 396

 452

 446

 465

 419

 434

 461

 431

 458

 381

 469

 485

 448

 446

 439

 488

 497

 463

 469

 465

 466

 279

 279

 281

 284

 285

 280

 284

 286

 292

 295

 293

 293

 293

 289

 289

 288

 286

 286

 285

 287

 285

 286

 285

 290

 295

 298

 295

 298

 305

 311

 307

 325

 323

 324

 330

 328

 330

 336

 329

 329

 329

 323

 329

 337

 325

 322

 325

 336

 329

 323

 314

 334

 335

 332

 346

 352

 352

 364

 355

 340

 359

 358

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 5, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 217

 216

 216

 220

 219

 220

 224

 219

 219

 219

 216

 219

 224

 217

 215

 217

 224

 219

 216

 210

 222

 223

 221

 230

 234

 234

 241

 235

 226

 238

 237

TOTAL 10,373

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 594

 598

 580

 596

 609

 602

 583

 558

 548

 536

 513

 595

 525

 454

 478

 465

 482

 505

 524

 570

 557

 574

 536

 500

 510

 533

 500

 517

 524

 389

 545

 551

 529

 555

 551

 573

 499

 489

 487

 476

 463

 478

 421

 394

 393

 407

 459

 431

 423

 519

 480

 473

 390

 387

 401

 412

 404

 391

 320

 302

 574

 585

 563

 577

 582

 587

 549

 529

 515

 506

 494

 533

 471

 423

 426

 436

 472

 471

 463

 544

 518

 508

 462

 437

 445

 459

 444

 446

 396

 343

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 25, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 371

 378

 364

 373

 376

 379

 355

 343

 334

 329

 321

 345

 307

 277

 279

 285

 308

 307

 302

 352

 336

 330

 302

 286

 291

 300

 290

 292

 261

 228

TOTAL 14,758

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

             Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
                         For Nevada Profit Corporations
         (Pursuant to NRB 78.385 and 78.380 - After Issuance of Stock)

1. Name of Corporation

PALOMINE MINING, INC.

2. The articles have been amended as follows (prove article numbers, if
available):


Article FIRST. That the name of the corporation shall be: "UNIVERSAL BIOENERGY,
INC."

Article FOURTH. That the total number of issued and outstanding shares of common
stock of the corporation (4,300,000 shares) shall be increased by way of a
forward stock split (the "Stock Split") in the amount of five (5) shares of
common stock for one (1) share of common stock currently issued and outstanding.
Thus for each share of common stock currently issued and outstanding an
additional four (4) shares of common stock shall be issued. Following the
effective date of the Stock Split the total issued and outstanding shares of
common stock of the corporation shall be approximately 21,500,000. The record
date for the Stock Split shall be November 3, 2007 with a payment date of
approximately November 6, 2007. That the total number of stock authorized that
may be issued by the corporation shall TWO HUNDRED MILLION (200,000,000) shares
of common stock with a par value of ONE TENTH OF ONE CENT ($0.001) and ONE
MILLION (1,000,000) shares of preferred stock with a par value of ONE TENTH OF
ONE CENT ($0.001). The Board of Directors of the corporation has full right and
authority to divide such shares, at any time and from time to time, into one or
more classes or series or both, as the Board may delegate and to determine for
any such class or series its voting rights, deligations, preferences and
priviledges, including, without limitation, conversion rights.

3. The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation
entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such
greater proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote
by classes or series, or as may be required by the provisions of the articles of
incorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is:

4. Effective date of filing:

5. Officer Signature (Required): /s/ Frank H. Ward
                                 ----------------------
### Geology of some copper deposits in North Carolina, Virginia, and Alabama

By: Gilbert H. Espenshade

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1142I

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Preliminary report, Hazel Creek mine, Swain County, North Carolina(1943)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00567

- CR

The State of Texas v. Joshua Cacias
On Appeal from the 28th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 12

- CR

- 2807

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause o n appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause
remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion

. We furthe r order this decision certified below for observance. August 14 , 2014
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 909

 811

 814

 740

 769

 773

 711

 528

 581

 681

 793

 882

 889

 872

 864

 888

 810

 747

 719

 707

 748

 761

 722

 666

 588

 537

 567

 463

 454

 475

 381

 371

 390

 392

 408

 425

 408

 370

 367

 396

 428

 437

 452

 441

 426

 442

 459

 447

 463

 467

 435

 418

 445

 441

 409

 412

 380

 383

 384

 389

 631

 540

 545

 524

 545

 551

 513

 422

 442

 508

 577

 646

 673

 635

 625

 665

 599

 562

 575

 573

 553

 548

 556

 572

 496

 482

 435

 412

 416

 412

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:May 11, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 406

 350

 353

 340

 353

 357

 333

 277

 289

 330

 373

 415

 432

 408

 402

 427

 386

 363

 371

 370

 358

 355

 360

 369

 323

 314

 285

 271

 273

 271

TOTAL 16,233

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
§ 645.30 How does the Secretary decide which grants to make? ( a ) The Secretary evaluates an application for a grant as follows: ( 1 ) ( i ) The Secretary evaluates the application on the basis of the selection criteria in § 645.31.
( ii ) The maximum score for all the criteria in § 645.31 is 100 points. The maximum score for each criterion is indicated in parentheses with the criterion.
( 2 ) ( i ) If an applicant for a new grant proposes to continue to serve substantially the same target population and schools that the applicant is serving under an expiring project, the Secretary evaluates the applicant's prior experience of high quality service delivery under the expiring Upward Bound project on the basis of the outcome criteria in § 645.32.
( ii ) The maximum total score for all the criteria in § 645.32 is 15 points. The maximum score for each criterion is indicated in parentheses with the criterion.
( iii ) The Secretary evaluates the PE of an applicant for each of the three project years that the Secretary designates in the Federal Register notice inviting applications and the other published application materials for the competition.
( iv ) An applicant may earn up to 15 PE points for each of the designated project years for which annual performance report data are available.
( v ) The final PE score is the average of the scores for the three project years assessed.
( b ) The Secretary makes grants in rank order on the basis of the application's total scores under paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section.
( c ) If the total scores of two or more applications are the same and there are insufficient funds for these applications after the approval of higher-ranked applications, the Secretary uses whatever remaining funds are available to serve geographic areas that have been underserved by the Upward Bound Program.
( d ) The Secretary does not make a new grant to an applicant if the applicant's prior project involved the fraudulent use of program funds.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-11, 1070a-13)
[60 FR 4748, Jan. 24, 1995, as amended at 75 FR 65786, Oct. 26, 2010]
Jefferson 

County 

Lewis & Clark U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

County Bureau of Land Management 

Sleeping Giant
 Existing ACEC
 

Malta
 

Field Office
 

Spokane Creek 

Missoula Proposed ACEC 

Field Office 

Lewistown Butte Field Office 

Field Office
 

Miles City Helena
 

Butte Field Office
 Draft RMP/EIS 

Field

Office
 Billings 

Field Office 

Dillon Map 32: Existing and Proposed Area

Field Office of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC) 

Miles 

Broadwater Designations Under Alternative C County 0 400 

Elkhorn 

Mountains 

Proposed 

ACEC Townsend 

Anaconda 

Deer Lodge 

Butte County Ringing Rocks
 

Proposed ACEC
 

Silver Bow
 

County
 

Humbug Spires 

Proposed ACEC Gallatin

County 

Livingston Bozeman 

City
 Interstate
 US Route
 MT Route
 Park 

Proposed ACEC County 

Existing ACEC County Boundary 

Field Office Boundary 

Map shows the existing and proposed Area of Critical Environmental
 Concern (ACEC) Designations under Alternative C. Sleeping Giant ACEC
 (11, 679 acres) is the only existing ACEC under Alternative A and
 would be carried forward under all alternatives. Additional potential
 ACEC's proposed under Alternative C would be: Elkhorns (67,665 acres),
 Humbug Spires (8,374 acres), Spokane Creek (14 acres), and Ringing
 Rocks (160 acres).
 

Miles 

0 40 

Map Scale 1:510,000 

Map generated by the Butte Field Office in February 2007 

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection 

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data for individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed through digital means and information may be updated without notification.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 829

 924

 915

 996

 958

 1,004

 554

 1,066

 1,072

 922

 808

 802

 873

 893

 811

 835

 695

 667

 706

 747

 760

 708

 618

 579

 601

 649

 688

 753

 785

 791

 744

 436

 451

 450

 459

 453

 454

 480

 518

 546

 541

 519

 496

 507

 536

 488

 493

 481

 464

 512

 554

 535

 564

 505

 497

 505

 527

 544

 583

 555

 603

 592

 565

 619

 578

 623

 589

 657

 525

 697

 693

 657

 631

 608

 683

 725

 608

 640

 555

 550

 586

 663

 659

 621

 543

 532

 552

 581

 603

 664

 671

 690

 665

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 12, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 365

 399

 373

 401

 380

 422

 340

 447

 444

 422

 406

 392

 438

 464

 392

 412

 359

 356

 378

 426

 423

 400

 352

 345

 357

 375

 389

 426

 431

 442

 427

TOTAL 19,233

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
§ 662.10 How does an individual apply for a fellowship? ( a ) An individual applies for a fellowship by submitting an application to the Secretary through the institution of higher education in which the individual is enrolled.
( b ) The applicant shall provide sufficient information concerning his or her personal and academic background and proposed research project to enable the Secretary to determine whether the applicant— ( 1 ) Is eligible to receive a fellowship under § 662.3; and
( 2 ) Should be selected to receive a fellowship under subparts C and D of this part.
(Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2452(b)(6))
EXHIBIT 32.1

STATEMENT OF CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER/PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I, Howard L. Ehler, Jr., the Chief Operating Officer/Principal Executive Officer of Imperial Industries, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,

(i)

the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:

March 31, 2009

| |                            
| | ---------------------------
| | /s/ HOWARD L. EHLER, JR.   
| | Howard L. Ehler, Jr.       
| | Chief Operating Officer/   
| | Principal Executive Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.