alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 5b.2 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This part implements section 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a (hereinafter referred to as the Act), by establishing agency policies and procedures for the maintenance of records. This part also establishes agency policies and procedures under which a subject individual may be given notification of or access to a record pertaining to him and policies and procedures under which a subject individual may have his record corrected or amended if he believes that his record is not accurate, timely, complete, or relevant or necessary to accomplish a Department function.
( b ) All components of the Department are governed by the provisions of this part. Also governed by the provisions of this part are advisory committees and councils within the meaning of the Federal Advisory Committee Act which provide advice to ( 1 ) any official or component of the Department or
( 2 ) the President and for which the Department has been delegated responsibility for providing services.
( c ) Employees of the Department governed by this part include all regular and special government employees of the Department; experts and consultants whose temporary (not in excess of 1 year) or intermittent services have been procured by the Department by contract pursuant to 3109 of title 5, United States Code; volunteers where acceptance of their services are authorized by law; those individuals performing gratuitous services as permitted under conditions prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management; and, participants in work-study or training programs.
( d ) This part does not: ( 1 ) Make available to a subject individual records which are not retrieved by that individual's name or other personal identifier.
( 2 ) Make available to the general public records which are retrieved by a subject individual's name or other personal identifier or make available to the general public records which would otherwise not be available to the general public under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, and part 5 of this title.
( 3 ) Govern the maintenance or disclosure of, notification of or access to, records in the possession of the Department which are subject to regulations of another agency, such as personnel records subject to the regulations of the Office of Personnel Management.
( 4 ) Apply to grantees, including State and local governments or subdivisions thereof, administering federally funded programs.
( 5 ) Make available records compiled by the Department in reasonable anticipation of court litigation or formal administrative proceedings. The availability of such records to the general public or to any subject individual or party to such litigation or proceedings shall be governed by applicable constitutional principles, rules of discovery, and applicable regulations of the Department.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 30, 2015

a0622 

# Order

Clerk June 30, 2015

150032 & (19)(20)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE O F MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150032

COA: 322104

Wayne CC: 11

- 004878

- FC

BERRY ROBINSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 11, 2014

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The

motions to remand and for the appointment of counsel are DENIED.
### §725. Regulations, etc., by Secretary of the Interior

Except where it is specifically provided otherwise, the Secretary of the Interior shall prescribe such regulations, exercise such functions, and perform such duties as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter.

(June 7, 1924, ch. 346, §5, 43 Stat. 651; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. II, §4(e), (f), eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2731, 53 Stat. 1433.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Enforcement functions of Secretary or other official in Department of the Interior related to compliance with approval to cross national wildlife refuges under this chapter with respect to pre-construction, construction, and initial operation of transportation system for Canadian and Alaskan natural gas transferred to Federal Inspector, Office of Federal Inspector for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System, until first anniversary of date of initial operation of Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System, see Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1979, §§102(e), 203(a), 44 F.R. 33663, 33666, 93 Stat. 1373, 1376, effective July 1, 1979, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees. Office of Federal Inspector for the Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System abolished and functions and authority vested in Inspector transferred to Secretary of Energy by section 3012(b) of Pub. L. 102–486, set out as an Abolition of Office of Federal Inspector note under section 719e of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. Functions and authority vested in Secretary of Energy subsequently transferred to Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects by section 720d(f) of Title 15.

Transfer of functions of Secretary of Agriculture and Secretary of Commerce to Secretary of the Interior by Reorg. Plan No. II of 1939, see Transfer of Functions note set out under section 723 of this title.
---

CERTIFICATION OF 
  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Boschert, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial
  Officer of Balsam Ventures, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant
  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                              

| | By:    | /s/ John Boschert       
| | ------ | ------------------------
| |        |                         
| | Name:  | John Boschert           
| |        |                         
| | Title: | Secretary, Treasurer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer 
| |        |                         
| | Date:  | May 21, 2004            

A signed original of this written statement required by
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
  and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which
  it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
  the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
  before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation
  language contained in such filing.

---
### §3240. Creation of new district or division

Whenever any new district or division is established, or any county or territory is transferred from one district or division to another district or division, prosecutions for offenses committed within such district, division, county, or territory prior to such transfer, shall be commenced and proceeded with the same as if such new district or division had not been created, or such county or territory had not been transferred, unless the court, upon the application of the defendant, shall order the case to be removed to the new district or division for trial.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 827; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §50, 63 Stat. 96.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### 1948 Act

Based on section 121 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Judicial Code and Judiciary (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §59, 36 Stat. 1103).

Section 121 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Judicial Code and Judiciary, was divided into two sections. Only the portion relating to venue in civil cases was left in title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Judicial Code and Judiciary.

Minor changes of phraseology were made.

#### 1949 Act

This section [section 50] strikes the second sentence of section 3240 of title 18, U.S.C., as unnecessary. Section "119" of title 28, U.S.C., referred to in such sentence, became section 1404 of title 28 upon its revision and enactment into positive law in 1948, but reference to the latter, in said section 3240 of title 18, U.S.C., is surplusage in view of rule 19 et seq. of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and the remainder of such section 3240.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1949—Act May 24, 1949, struck out "The transfer of such prosecutions shall be made in the manner provided in section 119 of Title 28".
### §1587. Possession of slaves aboard vessel

Whoever, being the captain, master, or commander of any vessel found in any river, port, bay, harbor, or on the high seas within the jurisdiction of the United States, or hovering off the coast thereof, and having on board any person for the purpose of selling such person as a slave, or with intent to land such person for such purpose, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 773; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 115–392, §11(1)(B), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5255.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §426 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §251, 35 Stat. 1139).

Mandatory-punishment provisions were rephrased in the alternative.

Minor change was made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–392 substituted "10 years" for "four years".

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $10,000".
### Middle and Lower Ordovician formations in southernmost Nevada and adjacent California

By: R.J. RossC.R. Longwell

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1180C

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**CORY WILLIAMS,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 173 EAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 30th day of August, 2016, the Petition for Al lowance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 672

 668

 648

 650

 646

 626

 632

 635

 647

 692

 693

 689

 768

 698

 681

 703

 717

 716

 721

 724

 748

 733

 701

 710

 710

 703

 705

 692

 684

 681

 652

 640

 633

 635

 618

 609

 611

 624

 626

 638

 663

 650

 663

 666

 633

 678

 690

 709

 712

 712

 720

 698

 693

 696

 698

 696

 680

 678

 676

 674

 662

 654

 641

 642

 628

 619

 616

 628

 633

 658

 677

 669

 703

 688

 662

 687

 704

 712

 717

 719

 738

 708

 697

 703

 705

 700

 693

 684

 681

 678

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 31, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 425

 420

 412

 413

 404

 399

 397

 404

 407

 423

 434

 429

 450

 441

 425

 441

 451

 456

 459

 460

 472

 454

 447

 450

 452

 449

 444

 439

 437

 435

TOTAL 20,306

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 705

 760

 806

 680

 854

 923

 873

 898

 665

 817

 761

 874

 830

 747

 729

 681

 662

 713

 747

 832

 934

 905

 900

 934

 850

 782

 762

 762

 763

 739

 594

 565

 540

 519

 554

 501

 499

 544

 580

 652

 608

 681

 664

 647

 630

 563

 546

 587

 639

 703

 728

 705

 664

 695

 694

 646

 647

 645

 610

 601

 647

 650

 665

 592

 690

 677

 644

 757

 609

 744

 647

 767

 735

 696

 680

 604

 597

 640

 676

 773

 846

 795

 773

 816

 775

 703

 699

 692

 677

 662

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 11, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 416

 418

 427

 382

 442

 434

 414

 484

 392

 476

 416

 490

 470

 446

 436

 389

 385

 412

 434

 494

 539

 507

 494

 520

 495

 450

 448

 444

 434

 425

TOTAL 20,928

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
#### § 101.107 Service on amici curiae.

All briefs, exceptions, memoranda, requests, and decisions referred to in this subpart J shall be served upon amici curiae at the same times and in the same manner required for service on parties. Any written statements of position and trial briefs required of parties under § 101.71 shall be served on amici.
§ 660.34 What priorities may the Secretary establish? ( a ) The Secretary may each year select for funding from among the following priorities: ( 1 ) Categories of eligible projects described in § 660.10.
( 2 ) Specific languages or regions for study or materials development; for example, the Near or Middle East, South Asia, Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe, Inner Asia, the Far East, Africa or Latin America, or the languages of those regions.
( 3 ) Topics of research and studies; for example, language acquisition processes, methodology of foreign language instruction, foreign language performance testing, or assessments of resources and needs.
( 4 ) Levels of education; for example, elementary, secondary, postsecondary or university-level education, or teacher education.
( b ) The Secretary announces any priorities in the application notice published in the Federal Register.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1126)
[47 FR 14124, Apr. 1, 1982, as amended at 58 FR 32577, June 10, 1993]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-7076

WEBSTER R. NEUMANN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

MR. WEDELLE, Superintendent; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:21-cv-00892-CCE-JEP)

Submitted: April 25, 2023 Decided: April 28, 2023

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER, Circuit Judge, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Webster R. Neumann, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7076 Doc: 10 Filed: 04/28/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Webster R. Neumann, a North Carolina prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely 

Neumann’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. See Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 148 & n.9 

(2012) (explaining that § 2254 petitions are subject to one-year statute of limitations, 

running from latest of four commencement dates enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)). 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue 

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that 

the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez, 565 

U.S. at 140-41 (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Neumann has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7076 Doc: 10 Filed: 04/28/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 14, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 14, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18I0193. DARTANIA CANTREZ ARNOLD v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

17CR1978
----

(2004/C 78 E/0830)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3101/03

by Jonas Sjöstedt (GUE/NGL) to the Council

(20 October 2003)

Subject:   EMU referendum and location of agencies

One of the arguments deployed in Sweden's EMU debate was that, if the Swedish people voted no in the referendum, Sweden's chances of being considered as a location for EU agencies, e.g. for the management of chemicals, would be diminished.

Now that the Swedish people have voted no to the single currency of the euro, does the Council consider that Sweden's chances of being considered as a location for an EU agency have worsened?

Reply

(4 March 2004)

The Council has not discussed the issue raised by the Honourable Member.

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 703

 691

 663

 665

 683

 702

 737

 754

 786

 805

 801

 809

 807

 804

 785

 778

 764

 773

 784

 790

 749

 744

 761

 765

 723

 756

 762

 697

 672

 711

 697

 685

 656

 644

 639

 664

 665

 704

 720

 753

 772

 773

 773

 777

 765

 753

 721

 716

 745

 745

 725

 687

 722

 681

 687

 667

 658

 673

 613

 589

 613

 604

 695

 675

 654

 655

 677

 678

 727

 741

 769

 785

 784

 795

 793

 785

 768

 757

 740

 757

 766

 765

 711

 736

 715

 725

 688

 706

 718

 652

 624

 641

 652

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 11, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 446

 433

 420

 421

 434

 435

 465

 474

 491

 501

 501

 507

 506

 501

 491

 484

 473

 484

 489

 489

 455

 471

 458

 464

 441

 452

 460

 419

 402

 412

 419

TOTAL 22,334

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-12-00138- CR NO. 03-12-00139- CR NO. 03-12-00140- CR NO. 03-12-00141- CR

Zane Thom as, Appellan t

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F B ASTROP CO UNTY, 21ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NOS . 14, 407, 14,5 95, 1 4,59 6, 14 ,655 HO NORAB LE REVA TOW SLEE CO RB ETT, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
The trial court convicted appellant Z ane Thomas of possession of a controlled substance weig hing less than one g ram, see Tex. Hea lth & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115(b) (West 2010); two counts of burg lary of a habitation, see Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 30.02 (West 2011); and t h ef t o f a fi rea

rm, see id. § 31.03(e) (4) (West 2011). The trial court sentenc ed appellant to fiftee n y ear s’ i ncar cer ation for the two burg lary convictions and two y ear s’ conf inement in a state jail fac ility

for both the controlled-substanc e and theft-of -a- firea rm convictions, with sentence s to
run conc urre ntly

.

Appellant’s court-a

ppointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the appea ls are frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the require mentsof Anders v. Calif or n i a b y p re senting a profe ssional evalua tion of the rec ord demonstrating why there are no arg uable g rounds to be advanc ed. See Anders v. Calif ornia , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); G a r n e r v . S ta te , 3 0 0 S. W. 3 d 7 6 3 , 7 6 6 ( T e x. Cr im

. A p p . 2 0 0 9 ) ; s e e a ls o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U
. S. 7 5 , 86–87 (1988). Appellant rec eived a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his rig ht to examine the appellate rec ord and to file a pro se brief. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744; Garner , 300 S.W .3d at 766. We have not re ceive d a pro se brief f rom the appe llant. We have conducte d an independe nt revie w of the rec ord, includin g ap p el l ate
c o u n s e l’ s b r ie f

, a n d f in d n o r e v e r s ib le e r

r o r . S e e A n d e r s , 3 8 6 U
. S. a

t 7 4 4 ; G a r n e r , 3 0 0 S. W. 3 d a

t 7 6 6 ; Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W .3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We ag ree with counsel that the

rec ord pre sents no arg uably meritorious g rounds for r eview a nd the appe als are frivolous. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is g rante d. The judgme nts of conviction are aff irmed.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Scott K. Field, Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Goodwin and F ield Affir med Filed: Mar ch 21, 2013 Do Not Publish

2