alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4933 

To amend the Women in Apprenticeship and Nontraditional Occupations 

Act to provide for reimbursement of certain expenses and to establish 

new requirements for selection of grantees, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 30, 2019 

Mr. VEASEY (for himself and Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Women in Apprenticeship and Nontraditional 

Occupations Act to provide for reimbursement of certain 

expenses and to establish new requirements for selection 

of grantees, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Women in Apprentice5 ship and Nontraditional Occupations Amendment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. IN GENERAL. 

7 Section 4 of the ‘‘Women in Apprenticeship and Non8 traditional Occupations Act’’ is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4933 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a)— 

2 (A) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘and’’; 

3 (B) in paragraph (7), by striking the pe4 riod and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(8) reimbursement to individuals for childcare 

7 and transportation expenses incurred as a result of 

8 participation in a program funded under this sec9 tion.’’; and 

10 (2) by amending subsection (b) to read as fol11 lows: 

12 ‘‘(b) SELECTION OF EMPLOYER AND LABOR

13 UNIONS.—The Secretary shall select not fewer than 1 em14 ployer or labor union from each State, and not fewer than 

15 50 employers or labor unions total, to receive technical as16 sistance provided with grants made under subsection 

17 (a).’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
First Amendment to Trust Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 First Amendment to the Trust Agreement for the Amended and Restated Bowater 
 Incorporated Executive
Severance Grantor Trust, Effective June 6, 2000 
 This First Amendment to
the Trust Agreement for the Amended and Restated Bowater Incorporated Executive Severance Grantor Trust, effective June 6, 2000, is made as of the 27th day of June 2007, by Bowater Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). 
 WITNESSETH: 

 WHEREAS, the Company previously established the Amended and Restated Bowater Incorporated Executive Severance Grantor Trust
effective June 6, 2000, (the “Trust”) to serve as a funding vehicle for certain designated non-qualified benefit plans, agreements and arrangements as set forth in the Trust Agreement (the “Trust Agreement”) dated
June 6, 2000 by and between the Company and Wachovia Bank, N.A., a national banking association organized and existing under the laws of the United States (the “Trustee”); and 
 WHEREAS, Article X of the Trust Agreement reserves to the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) the right to amend the Trust
Agreement and the Trust created thereby; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board now desires to amend the Trust Agreement as set forth herein.

 NOW, THEREFORE, the Trust Agreement is amended, effective as of the date of delivery to the trustee, Wachovia Bank, N.A., of this
executed Amendment, accompanied by a certified copy of the resolutions of the Board authorizing this Amendment, as follows: 
 Section 1.2(h)(a) of the Trust Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 
  

	 	(a)	The date that any Person is or becomes an Acquiring Person; provided, however, that for purposes of this subsection (a), a Change in Control will not be deemed to occur if the
accumulation of 20% or more of the combined voting power of the Corporation’s then outstanding securities which would result in such Person being or becoming an Acquiring Person is pursuant to a merger, consolidation or reorganization, or sale
or other transfer, that would not result in a Change in Control under subsections (b) or (c) immediately following this subsection (a). 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to the Trust Agreement for
the Amended and Restated Bowater Incorporated Executive Severance Grantor Trust, effective June 6, 2000, to be executed by its duly authorized officer, this 13th day of July, 2007. 
  

			
	BOWATER INCORPORATED
		
	By:	 	


		 	James T. Wright
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President – Human Resources
§ 286.3 Exceptions. The fees set forth in §§ 286.2(a) and 286.2(b) shall not be charged or collected from passengers who fall within any one of the following categories: ( a ) Persons arriving at designated ports-of-entry by the following vessels, when operating on a regular schedule: Great Lakes international ferries or Great Lakes vessels on the Great Lakes and connecting waterways;
( b ) Persons directly connected with the operation, navigation, or business of the commercial aircraft or commercial vessel including working crew, deadheading crew, U.S. Federal Aviation Administration inspectors, sky marshals, and commercial airline or commercial vessel employees on official business;
( c ) Persons who are listed as foreign diplomats on the accreditation list maintained by the U.S. Department of State or who are in possession of a diplomatic visa (A-1 and 2, G-1 thru 4) valid for entry into the United States;
( d ) Persons who are passengers on any commercial aircraft or commercial vessel owned or operated exclusively by the Government of the United States or a foreign government, including any agency or political subdivision thereof, so long as that aircraft or vessel is not transporting any persons or property for commercial purposes.
( e ) Persons who are passengers on commercial aircraft or commercial vessels under contract to the U.S. Department of Defense, if they have been preinspected outside of the United States under a joint Service and U.S. Department of Defense military inspection program;
( f ) Persons arriving on an aircraft or vessel due to an emergency or forced landing when the original destination of the aircraft or vessel was not the United States; and
( g ) Persons transiting the United States who are not inspected by the Service. Transit without visa passengers who are inspected by the Service are not excepted from payment of the fee under this section.
[53 FR 5757, Feb. 26, 1988, as amended at 59 FR 49348, Sept. 28, 1994; 68 FR 4092, Jan. 28, 2003]
C O N F I D E N T I A L

P A R T I I B
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration

          - 9 CFR Part 201
          - RIN 0580-AB10

# AGENCY:

Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration.

# ACTION:

Correcting amendments.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         on January 20, 2011 (76 FR 3485), defining required scale tests. That document incorrectly defined limited seasonal basis in § 201.72(a) (9 CFR 201.72(a)). This document corrects the final regulation by revising this section.                    

      ( print page 18349)    

# DATES:

Effective on April 4, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        S. Brett Offutt, Director, Policy and Litigation Division, P&SP, GIPSA, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20250, (202) 720-7363,                         *s.brett.offutt@usda.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

# List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 201

      - Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
      - Measurement standards
      - Trade practices

Accordingly, 9 CFR part 201 is corrected by making the following correcting amendment:

# PART 201—REGULATIONS UNDER THE PACKERS AND STOCKYARDS ACT

1. The authority citation for part 201 continues to read as follows: 

Authority:7 U.S.C. 181-229c.

2. In § 201.72, revise the last sentence of paragraph (a) to read as follows: 

§ 201.72 

                            (a) * * *                             *Except that*                             if scales are used on a limited seasonal basis (during any continuous 6-month period) for purposes of purchase, sale, acquisition, payment or settlement, the stockyard owner, swine contractor, market agency, dealer, live poultry dealer, or packer using such scales may use the scales within a 6-month period following each test.                        

* * * * *

Alan R. Christian,

Acting Administrator, Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration.

[FR Doc. 2011-7831 Filed 4-1-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-KD-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 412

 440

 415

 449

 422

 407

 416

 412

 398

 395

 405

 407

 411

 422

 452

 442

 472

 441

 445

 445

 435

 430

 432

 387

 399

 412

 338

 405

 458

 455

 443

 228

 229

 237

 238

 245

 254

 245

 249

 257

 249

 262

 267

 259

 257

 259

 248

 250

 253

 262

 257

 265

 266

 265

 269

 268

 272

 282

 288

 292

 291

 290

 267

 279

 295

 293

 292

 292

 287

 294

 304

 304

 307

 304

 296

 288

 293

 294

 297

 293

 299

 297

 299

 308

 312

 306

 296

 303

 303

 318

 335

 333

 339

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 7, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 181

 188

 198

 197

 196

 196

 193

 198

 204

 204

 206

 204

 199

 194

 197

 198

 200

 197

 201

 200

 201

 206

 209

 205

 199

 203

 203

 213

 223

 222

 226

TOTAL 9,327

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-11306

Summary Calendar

 

ROYAL MAYNE HOPPER, JR.,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(4:00-CV-1490-E)

 

March 2, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Royal Mayne Hopper, Jr., federal prisoner #27844-048, contests

the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition as meritless. On

double jeopardy grounds, Hopper’s petition attacks his 1993

criminal sentence, contending it was followed by the “civil

forfeiture” of his Social Security retirement benefits under 42

U.S.C. § 402(x)(1)(A)(i). 

Hopper’s double jeopardy claim is premised on an error in the

imposition of his sentence, rather than in the manner in which his

sentence is being executed. Therefore, the claim should have been

asserted in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or
2

correct the sentence. See Cox v. Warden, Fed. Detention Ctr., 911

F.2d 1111, 1113 (5th Cir. 1990) (“Section 2255 provides the primary

means of collateral attack on a federal sentence. Relief under

this section is warranted for any error that occurred at or prior

to sentencing. A petition under § 2241 attacking custody resulting

from a federally imposed sentence may be entertained only where the

petitioner establishes that the remedy provided for under § 2255 is

inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.”

(internal quotation marks, brackets, and citation omitted)). 

A 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion must be filed in the district where

the sentence was imposed; Hopper’s was in the District of Nevada.

See 28 U.S.C. § 2255; Solsona v. Warden, F.C.I., 821 F.2d 1129,

1132 (5th Cir. 1987). Therefore, the district court lacked

jurisdiction to construe Hopper’s petition as a § 2255 motion. Id.

In the light of the foregoing, the judgment is AFFIRMED on the

ground that Hopper failed to state a claim for relief under § 2241.

See Sojourner T v. Edwards, 974 F.2d 27, 30 (5th Cir. 1992) (court

of appeals may affirm district court’s judgment on any basis

supported by record), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 972 (1993). 

AFFIRMED
(No. 74-CC-32

#### Braun Automotive, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of General Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 23, 1973.*

Braun Automotive, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

In re: *

*

DAVID NEWTON WEBSTER, II, * Case No. 18-14048-KHK

* Chapter 7

*

Debtor. *

RESIGNATION OF TRUSTEE

The undersigned, as acting Chapter 7 Trustee in the above captioned case, hereby certifies 

that after appropriate inquiry into the affairs of the Debtor, he has determined that circumstances 

exist which render him not a disinterested person in this case, and which could possibly constitute a 

conflict of interest.

Therefore, the undersigned respectfully resigns as Trustee in the above captioned case.

September 3, 2019

Date /s/ Donald F. King

DONALD F. KING, TRUSTEE

1775 Wiehle Avenue, Suite 400

Reston, Virginia 20190

Direct: 703-218-2116

Fax: 703-218-2160

Email: donking@ofplaw.com

#4390618v1 31070/00001 

Case 18-14048-KHK Doc 88 Filed 09/03/19 Entered 09/03/19 19:42:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
- Newsroom        - Press Releases
      - Public Statements
      - Speeches
      - Testimony
      - Spotlight Topics
      - Media Gallery
      - Upcoming Events
      - Webcasts
      - What's New
      - SEC Videos
      - Reports and Publications
      - RSS Feeds
      - Social Media 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

**TIME AND DATE:**  Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission Investor Advisory Committee will hold a meeting on Thursday, July 25, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. (ET).

**PLACE:** The meeting will be held in Multi-Purpose Room LL-006 at the Commission’s headquarters, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. 

**STATUS:** This meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public.  Seating will be on a first-come, first-served basis.  Doors will open at 8:30 a.m.  Visitors will be subject to security checks.  The meeting will be webcast on the Commission’s website at www.sec.gov.

**MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:** On July 3, 2019, the Commission issued notice of the Committee meeting (Release No. 33-10658), indicating that the meeting is open to the public (except during that portion of the meeting reserved for an administrative work session during lunch), and inviting the public to submit written comments to the Committee.  This Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a quorum of the Commission may attend the meeting.

The agenda for the meeting includes: welcome remarks; a discussion regarding regulation in areas with limited completion, a discussion regarding trends in investment research (which may include a recommendation from the Market Structure subcommittee); a discussion regarding the proxy process (which may include a recommendation from the Investor as Owner subcommittee); a presentation on the work of the Office of the Advocate for Small Business Capital Formation; a presentation on the work of the Office of Minority and Women Inclusion; subcommittee reports; and a nonpublic administrative work session during lunch. 

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:**  For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.  

Dated:  July 18, 2019

Vanessa A. CountrymanSecretary
§ 606.1 What is the Developing Hispanic-Serving Institutions Program? The purpose of the Developing Hispanic-Serving Institutions Program is to provide grants to eligible institutions of higher education to— ( a ) Expand educational opportunities for, and improve the academic attainment of, Hispanic students; and
( b ) Expand and enhance the academic offerings, program quality, and institutional stability of colleges and universities that are educating the majority of Hispanic college students and helping large numbers of Hispanic students and other low-income individuals complete postsecondary degrees.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1101)
&Žƌŵ2600 (12/15)

United States Bankruptcy Court 

District Of 

In re , ) 

Debtor ) Case No. 

)

) Chapter 

 , ) 

Plaintiff ) 

)

v. ) 

 , ) Adv. Proc. No. 

Defendant ) 

ENTRY OF DEFAULT

It appears from the record that the following defendant failed to plead or otherwise defend 

in this case as required by law. 

Name: 

Therefore, default is entered against the defendant as authorized by Federal Rule of 

Bankruptcy Procedure 7055. 

Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court

By: 

Date Deputy Clerk 

Eastern Virginia

Potomac Pile Driver, LLC

17-34078-KRH

7

Peter J. Barrett

Martin et al. 19-03079- KRH

Potomac Pile Driver, LLC

WILLIAM C. REDDEN

12/16/2019 /s/: N. Bullock

Case 19-03079-KRH Doc 28 Filed 12/16/19 Entered 12/16/19 16:26:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4919 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4919

  To amend the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of 1999 to amend 
certain hours of service requirements for agricultural operations, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 30, 2019

  Ms. Craig (for herself, Mr. Smucker, Mr. Garamendi, Mr. Gibbs, Mrs. 
    Axne, and Mr. LaMalfa) introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of 1999 to amend 
certain hours of service requirements for agricultural operations, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Responsible and Efficient 
Agriculture Destination Act''.

SEC. 2. HOURS OF SERVICE REQUIREMENTS FOR AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS.

    Section 229 of the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of 1999 (49 
U.S.C. 31136 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1)--
                    (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by 
                striking ``during planting and harvest periods, as 
                determined by each State,''; and
                    (B) by amending subparagraph (A) to read as 
                follows:
                    ``(A) drivers transporting agricultural commodities 
                within a 150 air-mile radius from--
                            ``(i) the source of the agricultural 
                        commodities; or
                            ``(ii) the destination of the agricultural 
                        commodities;''; and
            (2) in subsection (e)(8)--
                    (A) by striking ``during the planting and 
                harvesting seasons within each State, as determined by 
                the State,''; and
                    (B) by striking ``at any time of the year''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4829 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the 50 percent 

limitation on the deduction for meal expenses does not apply to meals 

provided on certain fishing boats or at certain fish processing facilities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 23, 2019 

Ms. DELBENE (for herself and Mr. YOUNG) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

that the 50 percent limitation on the deduction for meal 

expenses does not apply to meals provided on certain 

fishing boats or at certain fish processing facilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Remote Seafood Em5 ployee Meals Tax Parity Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4829 IH

1 SEC. 2. MEALS PROVIDED ON CERTAIN FISHING BOATS 

2 AND AT CERTAIN FISH PROCESSING FACILI3 TIES NOT SUBJECT TO 50 PERCENT LIMITA4 TION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 274(n)(2)(C) of the Inter6 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ 

7 at the end of clause (iii), by striking the period at the 

8 end of clause (iv) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and by adding at 

9 the end the following new clause: 

10 ‘‘(v) provided— 

11 ‘‘(I) on a fishing vessel, fish proc12 essing vessel, or fish tender vessel (as 

13 such terms are defined in section 

14 2101 of title 46, United States Code), 

15 or 

16 ‘‘(II) at a fish processing facility 

17 which is located in the United States 

18 north of 50 degrees north latitude and 

19 which is not located in a metropolitan 

20 statistical area (within the meaning of 

21 section 143(k)(2)(B)).’’. 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

24 December 31, 2017. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
(No. 73-CC-340

#### Desaulniers and Company, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 19, 1973.*

Desaulniers and Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Douglas G. Olson, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.