alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
908 A.2d 1220

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner, v. Charles F. WILHELM, Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG No. 46,

Sept. Term, 2006.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Oct. 11, 2006.

*ORDER*

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition for Placement on Inactive Status. Upon consideration of said petition, it is this 11th day of October, 2006,

ORDERED, that the Respondent Charles F. Wilhelm, be, and he is hereby placed on inactive status until further Order of this Court, and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Charles F. Wilhelm from the register of attorneys in this Court until further Order of this Court and shall certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-772(d).
§ 5b.12 Contractors. ( a ) All contracts entered into on or after September 27, 1975 which require a contractor to maintain or on behalf of the Department to maintain, a system of records to accomplish a Department function must contain a provision requiring the contractor to comply with the Act and this part.
( b ) All unexpired contracts entered into prior to September 27, 1975 which require the contractor to maintain or on behalf of the Department to maintain, a system of records to accomplish a Department function will be amended as soon as practicable to include a provision requiring the contractor to comply with the Act and this part. All such contracts must be so amended by July 1, 1976 unless for good cause the appeal authority identified in § 5b.8 of this part authorizes the continuation of the contract without amendment beyond that date.
( c ) A contractor and any employee of such contractor shall be considered employees of the Department only for the purposes of the criminal penalties of the Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(i), and the employee standards of conduct listed in appendix A of this part where the contract contains a provision requiring the contractor to comply with the Act and this part.
( d ) This section does not apply to systems of records maintained by a contractor as a result of his management discretion, *e.g.,* the contractor's personnel records.
#### § 300.118 Children in public or private institutions.

Except as provided in § 300.149(d) (regarding agency responsibility for general supervision of some individuals in adult prisons), an SEA must ensure that § 300.114 is effectively implemented, including, if necessary, making arrangements with public and private institutions (such as a memorandum of agreement or special implementation procedures).

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0030)

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(5))

[71 FR 46753, Aug. 14, 2006, as amended at 72 FR 61306, Oct. 30, 2007]
(No. 73-CC-319

#### Art Lehde, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 5, 1973.*

Art Lehde, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Douglas G. Olson, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §1859. Surveys interrupted

Whoever, by threats or force, interrupts, hinders, or prevents the surveying of the public lands, or of any private land claim which has been or may be confirmed by the United States, by the persons authorized to survey the same in conformity with the instructions of the Director of the Bureau of Land Management, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 789; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §42, 63 Stat. 95; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(J), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### 1948 Act

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §112 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §58, 35 Stat. 1099).

Mandatory punishment provision was rephrased in the alternative.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### 1949 Act

This section [section 42] substitutes, in section 1859 of title 18, U.S.C., "Director of the Bureau of Land Management" for "Commissioner of the General Land Office," in view of the abolishment of the General Land Office, and the office of Commissioner thereof, by 1946 Reorganization Plan No. 3, §403, effective July 16, 1946 (11 F.R. 7876). Such plan consolidated the functions of the General Land Office and of the Grazing Service to form a new agency, the Bureau of Land Management, in the Department of the Interior and headed by a Director.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $3,000".

1949—Act May 24, 1949, substituted "Director of the Bureau of Land Management" for "Commissioner of the General Land Office".
### §1168. Theft by officers or employees of gaming establishments on Indian lands

(a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, or individual licensee of a gaming establishment operated by or for or licensed by an Indian tribe pursuant to an ordinance or resolution approved by the National Indian Gaming Commission, embezzles, abstracts, purloins, willfully misapplies, or takes and carries away with intent to steal, any moneys, funds, assets, or other property of such establishment of a value of $1,000 or less shall be fined not more than $250,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both;

(b) Whoever, being an officer, employee, or individual licensee of a gaming establishment operated by or for or licensed by an Indian tribe pursuant to an ordinance or resolution approved by the National Indian Gaming Commission, embezzles, abstracts, purloins, willfully misapplies, or takes and carries away with intent to steal, any moneys, funds, assets, or other property of such establishment of a value in excess of $1,000 shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned for not more than twenty years, or both.

(Added Pub. L. 100–497, §23, Oct. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 2487; amended Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXV, §3537, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4925.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 101–647 substituted "or imprisoned" for "and be imprisoned for".
Exhibit 10.24

AMENDMENT 2002-4        HILTON HOTELS RETIREMENT PLAN

WHEREAS, Hilton Hotels Corporation (the "Company") maintains the Hilton Hotels Retirement Plan (the "Plan"); and

WHEREAS,
the Board of Directors of the Company has granted the Hilton Hotels Pension and Thrift Committee (the "Committee") the authority to adopt amendents to the Plan on behalf of the
Company and all Participating Affiliates (as defined in the Plan) which amendment authority is reflected in Section 8.1 of the Plan; and

WHEREAS,
the Company wishes to amend the Plan provisions applicable to the determination of Years of Vesting Service.

NOW,
THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows effective as of January 1, 2003; such amendment shall apply only to individuals who are Participants under the Plan on or after the
effective date of the amendment:

1.    The
definition of "Years of Vesting Service" in Section 1.2 of the Plan is amended by the addition of the following paragraphs at the end thereof:



1

---



"Appendix H

ELAPSED TIME METHOD



2

---



3

---



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment 2002-4 is hereby adopted this 10th day of December, 2002.

| |  | HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION
| |  | -------------------------
| |  | By:                      

4

---

QuickLinks
MEMORANDUM

DATE: March 25, 2015

TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR-2013-0602

FROM: Rob Lawrence

EPA/Region 6/PD

SUBJECT: March 24, 2015 Presentation to the monthly meeting of the Dallas Section of the 

American Institute of Chemical Engineers. The presentation discussed the 

Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants as part of the overall 

Methane Strategy.

SUMMARY

A presentation was made by EPA at the monthly meeting of the Dallas Section of the 

American Institute of Chemical Engineers. The presentation discussed the Proposed Carbon 

Power Plan for Existing Power Plants as part of the overall Methane Strategy. The meeting was 

in Dallas, Texas.

ATTENDEES

Participants: The meeting was a dinner with business functions. There was no sign-in 

registration provided.

EPA Participant: Rob Lawrence (Region 6 Energy Policy Advisor)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. DARYL COOK, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 214 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 26th day of August, 2014, the Petition for All owance of Appeal is DENIED
.
### §1510. Implementation by Copyright Office

(a) Regulations.—

(1) Implementation generally.—The Register of Copyrights shall establish regulations to carry out this chapter. Such regulations shall include the fees prescribed under subsections (e) and (x) of section 1506. The authority to issue such fees shall not limit the authority of the Register of Copyrights to establish fees for services under section 708. All fees received by the Copyright Office in connection with the activities under this chapter shall be deposited by the Register of Copyrights and credited to the appropriations for necessary expenses of the Office in accordance with section 708(d). In establishing regulations under this subsection, the Register of Copyrights shall provide for the efficient administration of the Copyright Claims Board, and for the ability of the Copyright Claims Board to timely complete proceedings instituted under this chapter, including by implementing mechanisms to prevent harassing or improper use of the Copyright Claims Board by any party.

(2) Limits on monetary relief.—

(A) In general.—Subject to subparagraph (B), not earlier than 3 years after the date on which Copyright 1 Claims Board issues the first determination of the Copyright Claims Board, the Register of Copyrights may, in order to further the goals of the Copyright Claims Board, conduct a rulemaking to adjust the limits on monetary recovery or attorneys' fees and costs that may be awarded under this chapter.

(B) Effective date of adjustment.—Any rule under subparagraph (A) that makes an adjustment shall take effect at the end of the 120-day period beginning on the date on which the Register of Copyrights submits the rule to Congress and only if Congress does not, during that 120-day period, enact a law that provides in substance that Congress does not approve the rule.

(b) Necessary Facilities.—Subject to applicable law, the Register of Copyrights may retain outside vendors to establish internet-based, teleconferencing, and other facilities required to operate the Copyright Claims Board.

(c) Fees.—Any filing fees, including the fee to commence a proceeding under section 1506(e), shall be prescribed in regulations established by the Register of Copyrights. The sum total of such filing fees shall be in an amount of not less than $100, may not exceed the cost of filing an action in a district court of the United States, and shall be fixed in amounts that further the goals of the Copyright Claims Board.

(Added Pub. L. 116–260, div. Q, title II, §212(b), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2198.)

1 So in original. Probably should be preceded by "the".
#### § 669.7 Certification requirement.

The Governor of each State, or his or her designee, shall certify to the FHWA before January 1 of each year that it is obtaining proof-of-payment of the heavy vehicle use tax as a condition of registration in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 141(c). The certification shall cover the 12-month period ending September 30, except for the certification due on January 1, 2011, which shall cover the 4-month period from June 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010.

[75 FR 43409, July 26, 2010]
#### Frederick W. Maaloe, Appellant, v. Isador Zekowski, Respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7790

JAMES THOMAS WILLIAMS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CA-98-121)

Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 25, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Thomas Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge,

III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh,

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

James Thomas Williams appeals from the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). On appeal, Williams has failed to challenge

the district court’s finding that three of his claims were procedurally barred and that the fourth claim was not exhausted.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 200.70 Allocation of funds to LEAs in general. ( a ) The Secretary allocates basic grants, concentration grants, targeted grants, and education finance incentive grants, through SEAs, to each eligible LEA for which the Bureau of the Census has provided data on the number of children from low-income families residing in the school attendance areas of the LEA (hereinafter referred to as the “Census list”).
( b ) In establishing eligibility and allocating funds under paragraph (a) of this section, the Secretary counts children ages 5 to 17, inclusive (hereinafter referred to as “formula children”)— ( 1 ) From families below the poverty level based on the most recent satisfactory data available from the Bureau of the Census;
( 2 ) From families above the poverty level receiving assistance under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program under Title IV of the Social Security Act;
( 3 ) Being supported in foster homes with public funds; and
( 4 ) Residing in local institutions for neglected children.
( c ) Except as provided in §§ 200.72, 200.75, and 200.100, an SEA may not change the Secretary's allocation to any LEA that serves an area with a total census population of at least 20,000 persons.
( d ) In accordance with § 200.74, an SEA may use an alternative method, approved by the Secretary, to distribute the State's share of basic grants, concentration grants, targeted grants, and education finance incentive grants to LEAs that serve an area with a total census population of less than 20,000 persons.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 6333-6337)
[82 FR 31710, July 7, 2017]
§ 602.1 Why does the Secretary recognize accrediting agencies? ( a ) The Secretary recognizes accrediting agencies to ensure that these agencies are, for the purposes of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA), or for other Federal purposes, reliable authorities regarding the quality of education or training offered by the institutions or programs they accredit.
( b ) The Secretary lists an agency as a nationally recognized accrediting agency if the agency meets the criteria for recognition listed in subpart B of this part.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1099b)
§ 303.720 Data requirements—general. ( a ) The lead agency must annually report to the Secretary and to the public on the information required by section 618 of the Act at the times specified by the Secretary.
( b ) The lead agency must submit the report to the Secretary in the manner prescribed by the Secretary.
(Approved by Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0557) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1418, 1435(a)(14), 1442)
# Official Journal C 160A/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.160.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 160A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 566 June 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.160.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 160A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 566 June 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2013/C 160A/01 | Reserve lists — Open competitions | 1 |
| 2013/C 160A/02 | Addendum to the reserve list — Open competition (OJ C 54 A, 23.2.2013) | 4 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2013/C 160A/01

Reserve lists — Open competitions

1

2013/C 160A/02

Addendum to the reserve list — Open competition (OJ C 54 A, 23.2.2013)

(OJ C 54 A, 23.2.2013)

4

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2013/C 160A/03 | Corrigendum to the reserve list of the open competition EPSO/COM/AD/11/10 — Research Administrators (AD 6) in the domain of environmental sciences (OJ C 54 A, 23.2.2013) | 5 |

Corrigenda

2013/C 160A/03

Corrigendum to the reserve list of the open competition EPSO/COM/AD/11/10 — Research Administrators (AD 6) in the domain of environmental sciences (OJ C 54 A, 23.2.2013)

(OJ C 54 A, 23.2.2013)

5

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 27 | (RO) |
| 29 | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | |
| 36 | (DA) |
| 41 | (BG) |
| 43 | (EN) |
| 49 | (ET) |
| 50 | (HU) |
| 51 | (SL) |
| 54 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 58 | (EN/GA) |
| 75 | |
| 81 | |
| 82 | |
| 88 | (BG) |
| 89 | (CS) |
| 94 | |
| 104 | |
| 109 | |
| 111 | |
| 112 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 117 | (ET) |
| 118 | |
| 120 | |
| 131 | |
| 143 | |
| 160 | (DE/EN/FR) |

5

27

(RO)

29

33

34

36

(DA)

41

(BG)

43

(EN)

49

(ET)

50

(HU)

51

(SL)

54

(DE/EN/FR)

58

(EN/GA)

75

81

82

88

(BG)

89

(CS)

94

104

109

111

112

(DE/EN/FR)

117

(ET)

118

120

131

143

160

(DE/EN/FR)

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
### §1325. Liability for action on registration fraudulently obtained

Any person who brings an action for infringement knowing that registration of the design was obtained by a false or fraudulent representation materially affecting the rights under this chapter, shall be liable in the sum of $10,000, or such part of that amount as the court may determine. That amount shall be to compensate the defendant and shall be charged against the plaintiff and paid to the defendant, in addition to such costs and attorney's fees of the defendant as may be assessed by the court.

(Added Pub. L. 105–304, title V, §502, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2915.)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of CenterPoint Energy Houston
Electric, LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005
(the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, David M. McClanahan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ David M. McClanahan
------------------------------------------
David M. McClanahan
Chairman
March 24, 2006
_________________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 5, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128924 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 128925 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 128924, 128925 

 COA: 252872, 253861 

Kent CC: 03-002380-FH 

DAVID RONALD ECKMYRE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 3, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would peremptorily reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and 

remand for a new trial based on the trial judge’s failure to give an instruction on the 

burden of proof. 

p0329 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 5, 2006 

Clerk
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 778

 759

 761

 817

 846

 859

 844

 825

 791

 675

 699

 660

 695

 686

 838

 849

 839

 851

 868

 875

 867

 870

 887

 823

 746

 635

 709

 786

 754

 642

 636

 643

 639

 646

 636

 635

 629

 613

 608

 605

 588

 636

 625

 624

 674

 694

 627

 621

 598

 573

 594

 575

 591

 572

 571

 592

 616

 636

 698

 684

 681

 690

 708

 717

 695

 688

 679

 632

 656

 620

 677

 654

 728

 768

 787

 735

 725

 723

 678

 743

 700

 657

 684

 618

 623

 709

 698

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 13, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 447

 439

 437

 442

 454

 459

 446

 441

 436

 407

 421

 399

 434

 420

 466

 491

 502

 470

 464

 463

 435

 475

 449

 422

 439

 398

 401

 454

 447

TOTAL 20,055

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
## Incident Reporting Form

This is documenting an:

Lost Injury First Aid Incident Close Call Observation

Details of person injured or involved (to be filled in by person injured / involved if possible)

Person Completing Report:_____________________ Date:____________________

Pers on(s) Involved:___________________________

___________________________ Equipment :________________________

Event Details

Date of Event:_____________________ Location of Event:______________________

Time of Event:_____________________ Witnesses:_______________________

____

Description of Events (Describe tasks being performed and sequence of events):

_____________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________ ________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

*If more space is required please use the back of this sheet

Was event / inj ury caused by an unsafe act ( activity or movement) or an unsafe

condition (machinery or weather)? Please explain:

______________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________ ____________

TO BE COMPLETED ONLY IF LOST TIME/INJURY OR FIRST AID WAS REQUIRED

Type of injury sustained:

Cause of injury or first aid:

Was medical treatment

necessary? Yes_____ No_____

If yes, name of hospital or p h ysician:

Sig nature of Employee:_____________________________ Date:__________________

Signature of Supervisor:____________________________ Date:__________________