alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION www.edgaradvantage.com


Exhibit 10.21




Promissory Note


    December 31, 1998


    FOR
VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned jointly and severally promises to pay to the order of **Kenneth C. Weiss,** the principal sum of **FIVE Thousand** dollars (**$5,000.00**), together
with interest thereon from date at the rate of ten (10.0) percent per annum, paid monthly, until maturity.


Note Payable in Full on December 31, 1999


    Each maker and endorser severally waives demand, protest and notice of maturity, non-payment or protest and all requirements necessary to hold
each of them liable as makers and endorsers.


    Each
maker and endorser further agrees, jointly and severally, to pay all costs of collection, including a reasonable attorney's fee in case the principal of this note or any payment
on the principal or interest thereon in not paid at the respective maturity thereof, or in case it becomes necessary to protect the security hereof, whether suit be brought or not.


Payable
at:

547 Sanctuary Lane

Crownsville, MD 21032



	 

 	 
 	 

By:	 

/s/ KENNETH C. WEISS   
 Kenneth C. Weiss
President & CEO

XYROS Systems, Inc.





    Exhibit 10.21 Cont'd




Promissory Note


    December 31, 1998


    FOR
VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned jointly and severally promises to pay to the order of **Kenneth C. Weiss,** the principal sum of **FORTY-FIVE Thousand** dollars (**$45,000.00**),
together with interest thereon from date at the rate of ten (10.0) percent per annum, paid monthly, until maturity.


Note Payable in Full on December 31, 1999


    Each maker and endorser severally waives demand, protest and notice of maturity, non-payment or protest and all requirements necessary to hold
each of them liable as makers and endorsers.


    Each
maker and endorser further agrees, jointly and severally, to pay all costs of collection, including a reasonable attorney's fee in case the principal of this note or any payment
on the principal or interest thereon in not paid at the respective maturity thereof, or in case it becomes necessary to protect the security hereof, whether suit be brought or not.


Payable
at:

547 Sanctuary Lane

Crownsville, MD 21032



	 

 	 
 	 

By:	 

/s/ KENNETH C. WEISS   
 Kenneth C. Weiss
President & CEO

XYROS Systems, Inc.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SINOCUBATE, INC.





/s/ Tom Simeo

Date: May 13, 2011Tom SimeoChief Executive Officer, TreasurerDirector and Secretary
Case 19-10763-KHK Doc 29 Filed 04/08/19 Entered 04/10/19 16:01:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 15
Case 19-10763-KHK Doc 29 Filed 04/08/19 Entered 04/10/19 16:01:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 15
Case 19-10763-KHK Doc 29 Filed 04/08/19 Entered 04/10/19 16:01:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 15
Case 19-10763-KHK Doc 29 Filed 04/08/19 Entered 04/10/19 16:01:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 15
Case 19-10763-KHK Doc 29 Filed 04/08/19 Entered 04/10/19 16:01:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 15
Case 19-10763-KHK Doc 29 Filed 04/08/19 Entered 04/10/19 16:01:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 15
Case 19-10763-KHK Doc 29 Filed 04/08/19 Entered 04/10/19 16:01:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 15
Case 19-10763-KHK Doc 29 Filed 04/08/19 Entered 04/10/19 16:01:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 15
Case 19-10763-KHK Doc 29 Filed 04/08/19 Entered 04/10/19 16:01:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 15
Case 19-10763-KHK Doc 29 Filed 04/08/19 Entered 04/10/19 16:01:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 15
Case 19-10763-KHK Doc 29 Filed 04/08/19 Entered 04/10/19 16:01:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 11 of 15
Case 19-10763-KHK Doc 29 Filed 04/08/19 Entered 04/10/19 16:01:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 12 of 15
Case 19-10763-KHK Doc 29 Filed 04/08/19 Entered 04/10/19 16:01:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 13 of 15
Case 19-10763-KHK Doc 29 Filed 04/08/19 Entered 04/10/19 16:01:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 14 of 15
Case 19-10763-KHK Doc 29 Filed 04/08/19 Entered 04/10/19 16:01:53 Desc Main

 Document Page 15 of 15
### §833l. Acquisition of Indian lands

In aid of the construction of the Fort Peck project, there is granted to the United States, subject to the provisions of sections 833l to 833p of this title, such right, title, and interest of the Indians as may be required in and to such tribal and allotted lands as may be designated by the Secretary of the Interior from time to time for the construction, operation, and maintenance of electric transmission lines and other works of the project or for the relocation or reconstruction of properties made necessary by the construction of the project.

(Apr. 23, 1946, ch. 199, §1, 60 Stat. 118.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act May 18, 1938, which comprises this chapter.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
#### § 222.55 What other statutes and regulations are applicable to this subpart?

Local educational agencies receiving funds under section 8003(d) are subject to the requirements of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, and related regulations (20 U.S.C. 1401 *et seq.* and 34 CFR parts 300 and 303).

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1401 *et seq.*, 6314, and 7703(d))

[60 FR 50778, Sept. 29, 1995, as amended at 80 FR 33166, June 11, 2015]
### C AUTION !

¡ PRECAUCIÓN !



### AERIAL

PHOTOGRAPHY

IN PROGRESS



### ¡ ¡ ¡ REMAIN BACK 200 FEET ! !!
§ 606.24 How does the Secretary use an applicant's performance under a previous development grant when awarding a development grant? ( a ) ( 1 ) In addition to evaluating an application under the selection criteria in § 606.22, the Secretary evaluates an applicant's performance under any previous development grant awarded under the Developing Hispanic-Serving Institutions Program that expired within five years of the year when the development grant will begin.
( 2 ) The Secretary evaluates whether the applicant fulfilled, or is making substantial progress toward fulfilling, the goals and objectives of the previous grant, including, but not limited to, the applicant's success in institutionalizing practices developed and improvements made under the grant.
( 3 ) The Secretary bases the evaluation of the applicant's performance on information contained in— ( i ) Performance and evaluation reports submitted by the applicant;
( ii ) Audit reports submitted on behalf of the applicant; and
( iii ) Other information obtained by the Secretary, including reports prepared by the Department.
( b ) If the Secretary initially determines that the applicant did not fulfill the goals and objectives of a previous grant or is not making substantial progress towards fulfilling those goals and objectives, the Secretary affords the applicant the opportunity to respond to that initial determination.
( c ) If the Secretary determines that the applicant did not fulfill the goals and objectives of a previous grant or is not making substantial progress towards fulfilling those goals and objectives, the Secretary may— ( 1 ) Decide not to fund the applicant; or
( 2 ) Fund the applicant but impose special grant terms and conditions, such as specific reporting and monitoring requirements.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1101 *et seq.*)
¿Ha experimentado un desastre? 

Los desastres, tanto de origen humano como naturales, pueden causar reacciones 

emocionales, físicas y de comportamiento en las personas afectadas. 

La mayoría de las personas que experimentan un desastre, ya sea 

por exposición directa o indirecta, son afectadas de alguna manera. 

Aquí tiene algunas reacciones comunes a los desastres: 

▪ Teniendo problemas para conciliar el sueño, permanecer dormido, dormir

demasiado o para relajarse

▪ Notando un aumento o una disminución en sus niveles de energía y actividad

▪ Teniendo dificultad para hablar sobre lo que pasó o escuchar a los demás

▪ Sintiéndose ansioso o temeroso

▪ Estando agobiado por la tristeza

▪ Sintiéndose enojado, especialmente si en el evento

hubo violencia

▪ Teniendo dolores de cabeza u otros dolores físicos sin

una razón clara

▪ Estando nervioso o asustado con facilidad

▪ Teniendo problemas concentrándose y pensando

claramente

▪ Teniendo dificultad para tomar decisiones

HAY LUGARES PARA OBTENER AYUDA. ¿Está usted o un ser querido experimentando Línea de ayuda para casos de desastres (Disaster

alguna de estas u otras reacciones a Distress Helpline) 

NÚMERO GRATUITA: 1–800–985–5990 (inglés y español) un desastre reciente? 

TTY: 1–800–846–8517 

MENSAJE DE TEXTO: Envie “TalkWithUs” (o “Hablanos” para PARA MÁS INFORMACIÓN sobre las reacciones comunes ante español) al 66746 los desastres, así como las formas de lidiar con el estrés, consulte 

Línea de ayuda nacional (National Helpline) de SAMHSA los Consejos para Sobrevivientes de un Desastre u otro Evento NÚMERO GRATUITA: 1–800–662–HELP (1–800–662– Traumático: Manejo del Estrés en https://store.samhsa.gov/product/ 4357) (inglés y español) Tips-for-Survivors-of-a-Disaster-or-Other-Traumatic-Event-Managing- TDD: 1–800–487–4889 Stress-Spanish-Version-/SMA13-4776SPANISH. Otros recursos de 

salud mental para desastres también están disponibles en el sitio web Línea de vida nacional para la prevención del suicidio 

del Centro de Asistencia Técnica ante Desastres (Disaster Technical (National Suicide Prevention Lifeline) 

Assistance Center) de la Administración de Servicios de Salud Mental NÚMERO GRATUITA: 1–800–273–TALK (1–800–273– 

8255) (inglés y español) y Abuso de Sustancias (SAMHSA) en https://www.samhsa.gov/dtac o 

TTY: 1–800–799–4TTY (1–800–799–4889) llámenos al 1–800–308–3515. 

Localizador de centros para tratamiento de abuso de 

sustancias (Substance Abuse Treatment Facility Locator) 

NÚMERO GRATUITA: 1–800–662–HELP (1–800–662– 

4357) (24/7 en inglés y español) 

TDD: 1–800–487–4889 

PEP20-01-01-023

La misión de SAMHSA es reducir el impacto del abuso de sustancias y las enfermedades mentales en las comunidades de 

Estados Unidos. 1–877–SAMHSA–7 (1–877–726–4727) • 1–800–487–4889 (TDD) • www.samhsa.gov
§ 300.206 Schoolwide programs under title I of the ESEA. ( a ) *General.* Notwithstanding the provisions of §§ 300.202 and 300.203 or any other provision of Part B of the Act, an LEA may use funds received under Part B of the Act for any fiscal year to carry out a schoolwide program under section 1114 of the ESEA, except that the amount used in any schoolwide program may not exceed— ( 1 ) ( i ) The amount received by the LEA under Part B of the Act for that fiscal year; divided by
( ii ) The number of children with disabilities in the jurisdiction of the LEA; and multiplied by
( 2 ) The number of children with disabilities participating in the schoolwide program.
( b ) *Funding conditions.* The funds described in paragraph (a) of this section are subject to the following conditions: ( 1 ) The funds must be considered as Federal Part B funds for purposes of the calculations required by § 300.202(a)(2) and (a)(3).
( 2 ) The funds may be used without regard to the requirements of § 300.202(a)(1).
( c ) *Meeting other Part B requirements.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, all other requirements of Part B of the Act must be met by an LEA using Part B funds in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, including ensuring that children with disabilities in schoolwide program schools— ( 1 ) Receive services in accordance with a properly developed IEP; and
( 2 ) Are afforded all of the rights and services guaranteed to children with disabilities under the Act.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0600) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1413(a)(2)(D))
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7716
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SOLOMON WINDSOR, a/k/a Vincent Jonathan, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CR-90-224-A, CA-96-1109-AM) Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 19, 1997 Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Solomon Windsor, Appellant Pro Se. Nash Whitney Schott, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no revers ible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Windsor , Nos. CR-90-224-A; CA-96-1109-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# U n ited S tates C o u rt o f A p p ea ls Fo r th e Se ve n th C irc u it Ch i cago , I l l i noi s 6 0604 N ove m ber20 , 20 08 B efo re R IC H A R D A . PO SN E R, Cir cu i tJudg e 

### SANDRA C. LEISTER, ] Appeals from the United Plaintiff-Appellee, ] States District Court for Cross-Appellant, ] the Central District of ] Illinois. Nos. 07-2242, 07-3615 & 07-3671 v. ] ] No. 05 C 2115 MICHELLE PETERSON, EVAN PETERSON ] and DOVETAIL, INCORPORATED, ] Harold A. Baker, Defendants-Appellants, ] Judge. Cross-Appellees. ]

U pon consi derat i on o fthe P LA IN T IFF -A P P EL LE E/CR O S S -A P P EL LA N T ’S MOTI ON T O MODI F Y OP I NI ON , fil ed on N ovem ber 6, 2008 , by cou ns el for the p lai nt iff, I T I S OR D ERED thatthe m oti on i s GRAN T E D to the e xtent that the sl i p opi ni on o f October23 , 20 08 i s a m ended as f ol l ows: On li ne 12 o fpage 14 ofthe opi ni on, the phrase “M ay 2001 " s hal l be am ended to re ad “M ay 2000 ".
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 561

 525

 656

 624

 581

 406

 398

 396

 400

 487

 578

 599

 586

 553

 567

 575

 592

 588

 630

 636

 639

 639

 638

 641

 648

 686

 695

 718

 730

 736

 509

 451

 476

 444

 408

 392

 391

 392

 392

 400

 460

 524

 546

 540

 546

 554

 570

 572

 586

 620

 623

 624

 622

 626

 631

 653

 681

 694

 716

 707

 536

 497

 539

 551

 449

 398

 394

 394

 395

 438

 540

 583

 563

 547

 554

 565

 581

 580

 600

 627

 632

 631

 631

 634

 639

 669

 688

 702

 721

 726

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 25, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 347

 323

 349

 357

 293

 262

 259

 259

 260

 287

 350

 376

 364

 354

 358

 365

 375

 374

 387

 403

 407

 406

 406

 408

 411

 429

 441

 450

 462

 465

TOTAL 17,004

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
# Official Journal L 338/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 338 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5021 December 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 338

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5021 December 2007

---

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | BUDGETS |
| | | European Parliament |
| | | 2007/828/EC, Euratom |
| | * | Final adoption of amending budget No 6 of the European Union for the financial year 2007 | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

BUDGETS

European Parliament

2007/828/EC, Euratom

*

Final adoption of amending budget No 6 of the European Union for the financial year 2007

1

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.Any revenue provided for in Article 18(1) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.Figures for out-turn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 300

 337

 351

 364

 385

 386

 403

 407

 412

 415

 477

 489

 504

 509

 504

 506

 506

 511

 510

 494

 497

 517

 529

 537

 561

 626

 658

 614

 600

 612

 609

 232

 280

 269

 340

 354

 227

 315

 315

 388

 404

 354

 456

 424

 500

 492

 493

 491

 492

 488

 445

 402

 487

 511

 525

 519

 565

 280

 132

 218

 298

 543

 267

 314

 325

 354

 367

 340

 371

 380

 402

 411

 434

 480

 485

 506

 497

 499

 498

 502

 496

 485

 471

 502

 520

 533

 531

 604

 550

 398

 438

 515

 587

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 12, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 181

 210

 217

 235

 243

 226

 245

 251

 264

 270

 284

 313

 316

 329

 323

 324

 324

 326

 323

 316

 307

 326

 337

 345

 344

 389

 356

 262

 287

 334

 379

TOTAL 14,062

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
### §3011. Computation of time—(Rule)

#### See Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

Computation: enlargement; expiration of term; motions and affidavits; service by mail, rule 45.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 815.)
(No. 78-CC-0684

#### Charles Lindgren, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed May 4, 1978.*

Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of *288certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas v. State, 32*Ill.Ct.Cl.__, this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
### §3182. Fugitives from State or Territory to State, District, or Territory

Whenever the executive authority of any State or Territory demands any person as a fugitive from justice, of the executive authority of any State, District, or Territory to which such person has fled, and produces a copy of an indictment found or an affidavit made before a magistrate of any State or Territory, charging the person demanded with having committed treason, felony, or other crime, certified as authentic by the governor or chief magistrate of the State or Territory from whence the person so charged has fled, the executive authority of the State, District, or Territory to which such person has fled shall cause him to be arrested and secured, and notify the executive authority making such demand, or the agent of such authority appointed to receive the fugitive, and shall cause the fugitive to be delivered to such agent when he shall appear. If no such agent appears within thirty days from the time of the arrest, the prisoner may be discharged.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 822; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §601(f)(9), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3500.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §662 (R.S. §5278).

Last sentence as to costs and expenses to be paid by the demanding authority was incorporated in section 3195 of this title.

Word "District" was inserted twice to make section equally applicable to fugitives found in the District of Columbia.

"Thirty days" was substituted for "six months" since, in view of modern conditions, the smaller time is ample for the demanding authority to act.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–294 inserted comma after "District" in section catchline and in two places in text.
§ 110.2 To what programs or activities do these regulations apply? ( a ) These regulations apply to any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance from ED.
( b ) These regulations do not apply to— ( 1 ) An age distinction contained in that part of a Federal, State, or local statute or ordinance adopted by an elected, general purpose legislative body that— ( i ) Provides any benefits or assistance to persons based on age;
( ii ) Establishes criteria for participation in age-related terms; or
( iii ) Describes intended beneficiaries or target groups in age-related terms; or
( 2 ) Any employment practice of any employer, employment agency, labor organization, or any labor-management joint apprenticeship training program, except any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance for employment under the Job Training Partnership Act (29 U.S.C. 1501 *et seq.*).
(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6103)