alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022049EN.01000301.xml

| 31.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10108 – S&P GLOBAL / IHS MARKIT)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 49/03)

On 22 October 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10108. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10108. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
§ 31.4 Request to inspect and copy documents relating to a debt. ( a ) The Secretary makes available for inspection and copying before offset under this part those Department documents that relate to the debt, if the employee— ( 1 ) Files a written request to inspect and copy the documents within 20 days of the date of the pre-offset notice under § 31.3, and
( 2 ) Files the request at the address specified in that notice.
( b ) A request filed under paragraph (a)(1) of this section must contain— ( 1 ) All information provided to the employee in the pre-offset notice under § 31.3 that identifies the employee and the debt, including the employee's Social Security number and the program under which the debt arose, together with any corrections of that identifying information; and
( 2 ) A reasonably specific identification of the documents that the employee wishes to have available for inspection and copying.
( c ) The Secretary makes available documents for inspection and copying upon request by the employee. However, the Secretary may initiate an offset before making the requested documents available if the employee fails to request inspection and copying in accordance with this section.
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5514; 31 U.S.C. 3716)
### §3150. Applicability to a case removed from a State court

The provisions of this chapter apply to a criminal case removed to a Federal court from a State court.

(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §203(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1984.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3150, added Pub. L. 89–465, §3(a), June 22, 1966, 80 Stat. 216, related to penalties for failure to appear, prior to repeal in the revision of this chapter by section 203(a) of Pub. L. 98–473.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-0326 SNPRM

Directorate ID: 2011-CE-006-AD

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

 NO COMMENTS RECEIVED – If this box is checked, no signatures are required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:

If NO, we don’t agree because 
Page 2 of 3

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Date

Branch Manager Date
#### George R. Teich, Appellant, v. Joseph S. Lawrence et al., Defendants, and David M. Milton et al., Respondents, Cambart Co., Inc., Intervener, Appellant.

Present—Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

August 29, 2008

Ms. Claudia Wilson Frost

Pillsbury Withrop Shaw Pittman LLP

909 Fannin Street, Suite 2000

Houston, TX 77010

Mr. Frank Costilla

5 East Elizabeth

Brownsville, TX 78520

Mr. Jules L. Laird Jr.

5075 Westheimer, Suite 1150

Houston, TX 77056

Ms.  Rebecca  Gomez  Sexton

1814 Greenbriar Avenue

Brownsville, TX 78520

Mr. Britton D. Monts

Monts & Ware, L.L.P.

1701 North Market, Suite 330

Dallas, TX 75202

Mr. Hector H. Cardenas

2600 Via Fortuna, Suite 300

Austin, TX 78746

Mr. Rance L. Craft

Office of the Attorney General

P.O. Box 12548 (MC 059)

Austin, TX 78711-2548

RE:Case Number:  05-0653

Court of Appeals Number:  13-01-00062-CV

Trial Court Number:  93-02-00706-A

Style:GILBERT KERLIN, INDIVIDUALLY, GILBERT KERLIN, TRUSTEE, WINDWARD OIL & GAS CORP., AND PI CORP.

v.

CONCEPCION SAUCEDA, ET AL.

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinions and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  Petitioner’s Motion to Consolidate is dismissed as moot.

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 05-0653Page 2**
§ 463.620 What is the one-stop operator's role? ( a ) At a minimum, the one-stop operator must coordinate the service delivery of required one-stop partners and service providers. Local WDBs may establish additional roles of one-stop operator, including, but not limited to: Coordinating service providers across the one-stop delivery system, being the primary provider of services within the center, providing some of the services within the center, or coordinating service delivery in a multi-center area, which may include affiliated sites. The competition for a one-stop operator must clearly articulate the role of the one-stop operator.
( b ) ( 1 ) Subject to paragraph (b)(2) of this section, a one-stop operator may not perform the following functions: Convene system stakeholders to assist in the development of the local plan; prepare and submit local plans (as required under sec. 107 of WIOA); be responsible for oversight of itself; manage or significantly participate in the competitive selection process for one-stop operators; select or terminate one-stop operators, career services, and youth providers; negotiate local performance accountability measures; or develop and submit budget for activities of the Local WDB in the local area.
( 2 ) An entity serving as a one-stop operator, that also serves a different role within the one-stop delivery system, may perform some or all of these functions when it is acting in its other role, if it has established sufficient firewalls and conflict of interest policies and procedures. The policies and procedures must conform to the specifications in 20 CFR 679.430 for demonstrating internal controls and preventing conflict of interest.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-11-008]

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

April 12, 2011 at 11 a.m.

# PLACE:

Room 110, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS:

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agendas for future meetings: none.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 731-TA-1084-1087 (Review) (Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland, Mexico, Netherlands, and Sweden). The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determinations and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before May 3, 2011.

5. Outstanding action jackets: none.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. Earlier Notification of this meeting was not possible.

      ( print page 17967)    
By order of the Commission:

Issued: March 28, 2011.

William R. Bishop,

Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.

[FR Doc. 2011-7671 Filed 3-29-11; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
### **CHAPTER 115—TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES**

Sec.
2381.
Treason.
2382.
Misprision of treason.
2383.
Rebellion or insurrection.
2384.
Seditious conspiracy.
2385.
Advocating overthrow of Government.
2386.
Registration of certain organizations.
2387.
Activities affecting armed forces generally.
2388.
Activities affecting armed forces during war.
2389.
Recruiting for service against United States.
2390.
Enlistment to serve against United States.
[2391.
Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330004(13), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2142, struck out item 2391 "Temporary extension of section 2388".

**1953**—Act June 30, 1953, ch. 175, §5, 67 Stat. 134, added item 2391.
Exhibit (23)(ii)(A)

[PricewaterhouseCoopers Logo]

|
|
|

CONSENT OF AUDITORS

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Offering Circular constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 33-41418) filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 27, 1991 of our report dated February 19, 2003 which appears on page F-3 in Imperial Oil's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 19, 2003 on the
information under the caption "Presentation of Financial Statements" in item 6 of such Annual Report on Form 10-K, which appears on page F-2 of such Annual
Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Offering Circular.

(Signed) "PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP"

Chartered
Accountants
March 21, 2003

PricewaterhouseCoopers
refers to the Canadian firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the other member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each of which is a separate and
independent legal entity.

E-18

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10m4


                        HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
                     LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN


                                Third Amendment


                 Houston Industries Incorporated, a Texas corporation (the
"Company"), having established the Houston Industries Incorporated Long-Term
Incentive Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 1989, and as thereafter
amended (the "Plan"), and having reserved the right under Section 12.1 thereof
to amend the Plan, does hereby amend Section 2.1(e) of the Plan, effective
August 6, 1997, in its entirety to read as follows:

                 "(e)     'Company' means Houston Industries Incorporated, a
         Texas corporation, and any successor thereto."

                 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused these presents to
be executed by its duly authorized officers in a number of copies, all of which
shall constitute one and the same instrument, which may be sufficiently
evidenced by any executed copy hereof, this 26th day of February, 1998, but
effective as of August 6, 1997.

                                        HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED


                                        By  /s/ LEE W. HOGAN
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          Name:  Lee W. Hogan
                                               ----------------------------
                                          Title: Executive Vice President
                                                ---------------------------

ATTEST:

/s/ RICHARD B. DAUPHIN
---------------------------------
Assistant Corporate Secretary
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 229

 230

 229

 227

 223

 229

 239

 239

 246

 259

 291

 323

 324

 320

 254

 246

 245

 258

 288

 290

 328

 276

 229

 225

 226

 227

 225

 215

 214

 218

 202

 203

 200

 198

 199

 199

 200

 202

 200

 199

 196

 193

 197

 201

 196

 202

 193

 196

 199

 197

 213

 195

 191

 194

 198

 194

 192

 198

 189

 184

 214

 217

 215

 211

 209

 214

 219

 221

 220

 222

 230

 243

 244

 252

 219

 217

 216

 220

 228

 237

 272

 226

 213

 215

 214

 214

 213

 209

 202

 200

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 8, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 148

 150

 149

 146

 145

 148

 151

 153

 152

 153

 158

 166

 167

 172

 151

 150

 149

 152

 157

 162

 184

 156

 148

 149

 148

 148

 148

 145

 141

 140

TOTAL 6,646

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
### §1025. False pretenses on high seas and other waters

Whoever, upon any waters or vessel within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, by any fraud, or false pretense, obtains from any person anything of value, or procures the execution and delivery of any instrument of writing or conveyance of real or personal property, or the signature of any person, as maker, endorser, or guarantor, to or upon any bond, bill, receipt, promissory note, draft, or check, or any other evidence of indebtedness, or fraudulently sells, barters, or disposes of any bond, bill, receipt, promissory note, draft, or check, or other evidence of indebtedness, for value, knowing the same to be worthless, or knowing the signature of the maker, endorser, or guarantor thereof to have been obtained by any false pretenses, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both; but if the amount, value or the face value of anything so obtained does not exceed $1,000, he shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 755; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §22, 63 Stat. 92; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), (K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §606(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3511.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### 1948 Act

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §467a (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §288A, as added Aug. 5, 1939, ch. 434, 53 Stat. 1205).

Words "upon any waters or vessel within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States" were substituted for "upon the high seas or on any waters within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States and out of the jurisdiction of any particular State, or within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States and out of the jurisdiction of any particular State on board any vessel belonging in whole or in part to the United States or any citizen thereof or to any corporation created by or under the laws of the United States, or of any State, Territory, or District thereof", near beginning of section. The deleted words are not necessary in view of definitive section 7 of this title.

Words "whatsoever with intent to defraud" were omitted as being included in the preceding term "false pretenses".

The punishment provision was revised to include a misdemeanor punishment (not more than $1,000 or one year, or both) where the offense involves $100 or less. (See reviser's notes under sections 641 and 645 of this title.)

#### 1949 Act

This section [section 22] corrects a typographical error in section 1025 of title 18, U.S.C.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–294 substituted "$1,000" for "$100".

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000" after "pretenses, shall be" and for "fined not more than $1,000" after "he shall be".

1949—Act May 24, 1949, corrected spelling of "pretense".
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5008 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5008

 To direct the Inspector General of the Department of Veterans Affairs 
to perform certain duties regarding underperforming medical centers of 
                            the Department.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 8, 2019

 Mr. Gallego introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Inspector General of the Department of Veterans Affairs 
to perform certain duties regarding underperforming medical centers of 
                            the Department.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``VA Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. DUTIES OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS REGARDING UNDERPERFORMING MEDICAL CENTERS OF THE 
              DEPARTMENT.

    (a) List of Recommendations.--Not later than 90 days after the 
issuance of the end-of-year relative performance star ratings (in this 
section referred to as ``Star Ratings'') for each fiscal year, the 
Inspector General of the Department of Veterans Affairs shall identify 
and transmit a list of specific improvement recommendations for each 
medical center of the Department that received fewer than two stars in 
the Star Ratings regarding quality of care for the most recent fiscal 
year. The Inspector General shall transmit each such list to--
            (1) the Director of the medical center named in the list;
            (2) the Secretary of Veterans Affairs;
            (3) the Committees on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate and 
        the House of Representatives;
            (4) the Senators for the State in which the medical center 
        is located; and
            (5) the Representative in whose congressional district the 
        medical center is located.
    (b) Progress Reports.--Not later than 180 days after the Inspector 
General transmits a list under subsection (a), the Inspector General 
shall publish on the website of the Department and submit to the 
recipients of that list a report that identifies--
            (1) the extent to which the Director of the medical center 
        implemented the improvement recommendations;
            (2) any change in the performance of the medical center.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-20708

Summary Calendar

__________________

KENNETH W. MAGGARD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

(CA-H-96-757)

______________________________________________

December 20, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Texas state prisoner Kenneth W. Maggard, #536922, appeals the

dismissal of his suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) for lack of

venue. Having reviewed the record and Maggard’s brief, we hold

that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing
1Maggard’s motion for stay pending appeal is also dismissed.

2

Maggard’s action without prejudice. See Lowery v. Estelle, 533

F.2d 265, 267 (5th Cir. 1976).

Because the appeal is frivolous it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R.

42.2.1 We warn Maggard that any additional frivolous appeals filed

by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions.

To avoid sanctions, Maggard is further cautioned to review any

pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
388 P.2d 80

#### Benny BLACKWELL, Petitioner, v. The DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY, Respondent.

No. 44 HC.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Jan. 8, 1964.

COMPTON, Chief Justice, and CARMODY, CHAVEZ, NOBLE and MOISE, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that free process be and the same is hereby granted, and the petition for writ of error be and the same is hereby denied for the reason that the petition presents no facts that would warrant action of this Court.