alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3491. Foreign documents

Any book, paper, statement, record, account, writing, or other document, or any portion thereof, of whatever character and in whatever form, as well as any copy thereof equally with the original, which is not in the United States shall, when duly certified as provided in section 3494 of this title, be admissible in evidence in any criminal action or proceeding in any court of the United States if the court shall find, from all the testimony taken with respect to such foreign document pursuant to a commission executed under section 3492 of this title, that such document (or the original thereof in case such document is a copy) satisfies the authentication requirements of the Federal Rules of Evidence, unless in the event that the genuineness of such document is denied, any party to such criminal action or proceeding making such denial shall establish to the satisfaction of the court that such document is not genuine. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to require authentication under the provisions of section 3494 of this title of any such foreign documents which may otherwise be properly authenticated by law.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 834; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §52, 63 Stat. 96; Pub. L. 88–619, §2, Oct. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 995; Pub. L. 94–149, §3, Dec. 12, 1975, 89 Stat. 806.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### 1948 Act

Based on section 695a of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Judicial Code and Judiciary (June 20, 1936, ch. 640, §2, 49 Stat. 1562.)

#### 1949 Act

This section [section 52] corrects section 3491 of title 18, U.S.C., so that the references therein will be to the correct section numbers in title 28, U.S.C., as revised and enacted in 1948.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Rules of Evidence, referred to in text, are set out in the Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### Amendments

1975—Pub. L. 94–149 substituted "the authentication requirements of the Federal Rules of Evidence" for "the requirements of section 1732 of Title 28".

1964—Pub. L. 88–619 struck out "and section 1741 of Title 28" after "section 3494 of this title" in two places.

1949—Act May 24, 1949, substituted "section 1741" for "section 695e" and "section 1732" for "section 695" wherever appearing.
# Official Journal L 338/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 338 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6423 September 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 338

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6423 September 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | RECOMMENDATIONS |
| | * | Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/1700 of 15 September 2021 on internal compliance programmes for controls of research involving dual-use items under Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council setting up a Union regime for the control of exports, brokering, technical assistance, transit and transfer of dual-use items | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

RECOMMENDATIONS

*

Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/1700 of 15 September 2021 on internal compliance programmes for controls of research involving dual-use items under Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council setting up a Union regime for the control of exports, brokering, technical assistance, transit and transfer of dual-use items

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
CVC Water Delivery Records

Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Red indicates Scheduled Data Green indicates Confirmed Delivery Data Contract Water Year Allocated Supply = 100%

Blue indicates Actual Data Peach Cells indicate Article 55 Actions Deliveries to or on Behalf of CVC Contractors (Includes Allocated Supply or Acquired Water)

Feb-24

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Banks 

AF

Article 55 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Banks 

(No Losses 

Applies)

3% Loss Between 

Banks and 

O'Neill 

Based on 

Actual Banks 

Pumping

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Tracy 

AF

CVC Water 

Pumped @ 

O'Neill 

AF

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Dos 

Amigos for 

Delivery 

AF

O'Neill 

USBR to 

DWR 

Exchanges

O'Neill 

DWR to 

USBR 

Exchanges

San Luis WD to 

Arvin Edison 

WSD Transfer 

using CoF 

Contract 

SWPAO#21-307

Arvin-Edison 

SJRRP supply 

using CoF 

Contract 

SWPAO#21-

307/SOD-23-526

Previously Stored 

Pixley ID 2023 

CVC to Berrenda 

Mesa WSD (via 

Article 55) 

SWPAO#23-037

Previously Stored 

Lower-Tule River 

ID 2023 CVC to 

Berrenda Mesa 

WSD (via Article 

55) SWPAO#23-

037

2/1/2024 181 AF 181 AF 181 AF

2/2/2024 181 AF 181 AF 181 AF

2/3/2024 181 AF 181 AF 181 AF

2/4/2024 116 AF 116 AF 116 AF

2/5/2024 116 AF 116 AF 116 AF

2/6/2024 116 AF 116 AF 116 AF

2/7/2024 116 AF 116 AF 116 AF

2/8/2024 116 AF 116 AF 116 AF

2/9/2024 116 AF 116 AF 116 AF

2/10/2024 116 AF 116 AF 116 AF2/11/2024 254 AF 254 AF 254 AF2/12/2024 254 AF 254 AF 254 AF2/13/2024 254 AF 254 AF 254 AF

2/14/2024 254 AF 254 AF 254 AF

2/15/2024 254 AF 254 AF 254 AF 99 AF 99 AF2/16/2024 254 AF 254 AF 254 AF 99 AF 99 AF2/17/2024 254 AF 254 AF 254 AF 99 AF 99 AF2/18/2024 254 AF 254 AF 254 AF 99 AF 99 AF2/19/2024 435 AF 435 AF 207 AF 228 AF 99 AF 99 AF2/20/2024 435 AF 435 AF 435 AF 99 AF 99 AF

2/21/2024 435 AF 435 AF 435 AF 99 AF 99 AF

2/22/2024 435 AF 435 AF 435 AF 99 AF 99 AF

2/23/2024 435 AF 435 AF 435 AF 99 AF 99 AF

2/24/2024 435 AF 435 AF 435 AF 99 AF 99 AF

2/25/2024 435 AF 435 AF 435 AF 99 AF 99 AF

2/26/2024 435 AF 435 AF 435 AF 99 AF 99 AF

2/27/2024 435 AF 435 AF 435 AF 99 AF 99 AF

2/28/2024 435 AF 435 AF 435 AF 99 AF 99 AF

2/29/2024 406 AF 435 AF 435 AF 99 AF 99 AF

Monthly Total 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 8,143 AF 8,172 AF 0 AF 3,594 AF 4,578 AF 1,485 AF 1,485 AF 0 AF 0 AF 

Running total delivered for each individual action= 6,000 AF 4,578 AF 1,485 AF 1,485 AF 0 AF 0 AF 

Note:

Contract Water Year 2023 (Mar 1, 2023 to Feb 28, 2024) Breakdown of CVC Supply, Article 55 and Transfer In Deliveries

Mar 1, 2023 to 

Feb 28, 2024 CVC Banks Art 55 at Banks Losses Banks to O'Neill CVC at Tracy CVC at O'Neill CVC at Dos Amigos O'Neill USBR to DWR Exchange O'Neill DWR to USBR Exchange Kern-Tulare County of Fresno Hills Valley Tri Valley County of Tulare Pixley Lower 

Year to Date Contract 

Wtr Yr Total 25,801 AF 3,212 AF 765 AF 1,482 AF 1,482 AF 55,054 AF 38,725 AF 8,707 AF 7,987 AF 37,667 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 12,857 AF 12,862 

V:\~WATER\~SMITH\Cross Valley Contractor Deliveries Info\03-2023 to 02-2024\Master 03_2023 to 02_2024 CVC Deliveries New Format
(No. 74-CC-361

#### Texaco, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Corrections, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 25, 1974.*

Texaco, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 468 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 468

 Relative to the death of the Honorable Jocelyn Burdick, former United 
             States Senator for the State of North Dakota.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 13, 2020

    Mr. Hoeven (for himself and Mr. Cramer) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Relative to the death of the Honorable Jocelyn Burdick, former United 
             States Senator for the State of North Dakota.

Whereas Jocelyn Burdick was born in Fargo, North Dakota, and attended Principia 
        College and Northwestern University;
Whereas Jocelyn Burdick began her career as a radio announcer in Moorhead, 
        Minnesota, served as a trustee to the newly reorganized Lake Agassiz 
        Arts Council in 1977, was a Sunday school teacher and devoted member of 
        the Christian Science Church, was president of the Parent Teacher 
        Association, recorded public service announcements raising awareness of 
        substance abuse and drunk driving, and was nationally recognized for her 
        philanthropy on behalf of the Gamma Phi Beta sorority;
Whereas, on September 12, 1992, Jocelyn Burdick became the first woman from the 
        State of North Dakota to serve in the United States Senate when then-
        Governor George Sinner appointed her to fill the seat of her late 
        husband, Quentin Burdick;
Whereas Jocelyn Burdick was sworn in on September 16, 1992, and served in the 
        United States Senate until December 14, 1992; and
Whereas, during her time as United States Senator for North Dakota, Jocelyn 
        Burdick served the people of North Dakota and continued the agenda of 
        her late husband, including by supporting the enactment of the Federal 
        Facility Compliance Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-386; 106 Stat. 1505), 
        helping to establish the Quentin N. Burdick Indian Health Program at the 
        University of North Dakota, supporting health care training programs for 
        Native Americans, and helping to secure funding for the Federal 
        courthouse in Fargo named after her late husband: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That--
            (1) the Senate has heard with profound sorrow and deep 
        regret the announcement of the death of the Honorable Jocelyn 
        Burdick, former Member of the United States Senate;
            (2) the Secretary of the Senate communicate this resolution 
        to the House of Representatives and transmit an enrolled copy 
        thereof to the family of the deceased; and
            (3) when the Senate adjourns today, it stand adjourned as a 
        further mark of respect to the memory of the Honorable Jocelyn 
        Burdick.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REMEDIAL ACTION

DELETION DOCKET

FOR

A&F MATERIAL RECLAIMING SITE

GREENUP, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, ILLINOIS

JANUARY 17, 2012

NO. DATE AUTHOR RECIPIENT TITLE/DESCRIPTION PAGES

1 1988-2010 U.S. EPA Public Administrative Record 15

Index for the A&F Material

Reclaiming Site (DOCUMENTS

CONTAINED ON THE INDEX

ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE DELETION

DOCKET) (SDMS ID: 374684,

374685)

2 10/06/11 Karl, R., U.S. EPA Final Close Out Report 8

U.S. EPA for the A&F Material

Reclaiming Site (SDMS

ID: 416803)

3 11/30/11 Kim, J., Karl, R., Letter re: Illinois EPA 1

Illinois EPA U.S. EPA Concurrence for the Delisting of the A&F

Material Reclaiming Site
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

 __________________ Division

In re 

Case No.

Debtor(s) Chapter 13 

 ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE CHAPTER 13 PLAN, LISTS, SCHEDULES 

 AND STATEMENTS AND REQUIRING DEBTOR TO GIVE NOTICE 

The debtor(s) have filed a motion to extend the time for filing their Chapter 13 plan, lists, 

schedules and statements. Accordingly it is ORDERED that 

1. the debtor’s motion to extend the time to file a plan is granted. 

2. the deadline for filing a Chapter 13 plan is extended to _______________________________. 

3. the debtor(s) shall forthwith notify the trustee and all creditors of the respective deadline 

set for the filing of the plan. 

4. under authority of Local Bankruptcy Rule 1007-1, the time is extended to 

___________________________ , for filing all lists, schedules and statements. 

5. failure of the debtor(s) to file the plan, lists, schedules and statements on or before the 

deadlines set forth in paragraphs 2 and 4 above will result in the case being dismissed. 

WILLIAM C. REDDEN 

Clerk of Court 

Date: ________________________ By ___________________________________ 

 Deputy Clerk 

 NOTICE OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER 

 ENTERED ON DOCKET 

 _______________________________ 

. 

 [oex13ps ver. 01/10]

Alexandria

Daniel Patrick Fitzgerald

18-14106-BFK

January 2, 2019

January 2, 2019

December 26, 2018 /s/ Elizabeth W. Douglass

December 26, 2018

Case 18-14106-BFK Doc 12 Filed 12/26/18 Entered 12/26/18 07:32:57 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
§ 222.195 How does the Secretary make funds available to grantees? The Secretary makes funds available to a grantee during a project period using the following procedure: ( a ) Upon final approval of the grant proposal, the Secretary authorizes a project period of up to 60 months based upon the nature of the grant proposal and the time needed to complete the project.
( b ) The Secretary then initially makes available to the grantee 10 percent of the total award amount.
( c ) After the grantee submits a copy of the emergency or modernization contract approved by the grantee's governing board, the Secretary makes available 80 percent of the total award amount to a grantee.
( d ) The Secretary makes available up to the remaining 10 percent of the total award amount to the grantee after the grantee submits a statement that— ( 1 ) Details any earnings, savings, or interest;
( 2 ) Certifies that— ( i ) The project is fully completed; and
( ii ) All the awarded funds have been spent for grant purposes; and
( 3 ) Is signed by the— ( i ) Chairperson of the governing board;
( ii ) Superintendent of schools; and
( iii ) Architect of the project.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7707(b))
FINAL 

Environmental Impact Statement 

for the Lost Creek Uranium In-Situ Recovery Project, 

Sweetwater County, Wyoming 

Volume I

July 2012 

BLM Publication Index Number: BLM/WY/PL-12/019+1330 

DOI Control Number: FES 12-31 

B

L

M 

,

Wyoming High Desert District 

– Rawlins Field Office 
BLM Publication Index Number: BLM/WY/PL-12/019+1330 

DOI Control Number: FES 12-31 

Mission Statement 

The BLM’s multiple-use mission, set forth in the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 

1976, mandates that we manage public land resources for a variety of uses, such as energy 

development, livestock grazing, recreation, and timber harvesting, while protecting a wide 

array of natural, cultural, and historical resources.
EXHIBIT 32.01

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Ocean  Power
Corporation  (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),
Michael Hopper, as Authorized Signatory of the Company,  certifies,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

        /s/ MICHAEL HOPPER
        ----------------------------
Name:   Michael Hopper
Title:  Authorized Signatory
Date:   January 31, 2008

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 781

 801

 777

 773

 854

 562

 520

 565

 767

 805

 821

 666

 640

 659

 731

 769

 763

 726

 711

 777

 763

 651

 688

 754

 692

 746

 727

 722

 662

 754

 755

 467

 460

 451

 476

 532

 486

 497

 502

 509

 524

 528

 531

 608

 626

 641

 727

 711

 662

 666

 702

 609

 555

 582

 562

 499

 561

 552

 583

 500

 583

 664

 568

 586

 525

 551

 686

 511

 507

 537

 572

 663

 658

 593

 623

 640

 675

 754

 734

 696

 690

 733

 669

 621

 631

 628

 593

 653

 614

 644

 564

 664

 708

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 20, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 367

 378

 340

 357

 440

 332

 329

 348

 369

 426

 423

 382

 401

 412

 433

 482

 470

 446

 442

 469

 429

 400

 406

 404

 382

 420

 395

 414

 365

 426

 454

TOTAL 19,491

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
§ 33.31 Determining the amount of penalties and assessments. ( a ) In determining an appropriate amount of civil penalties and assessments, the ALJ and the Department head, upon appeal, evaluate any circumstances that mitigate or aggravate the violation and articulate in their opinions the reasons that support the penalties and assessments they impose. Because of the intangible costs of fraud, the expense of investigating fraudulent conduct, and the need to deter others who might be similarly tempted, ordinarily double damages and a significant civil penalty is imposed.
( b ) Although not exhaustive, the following factors are among those that may influence the ALJ and the Department head in determining the amount of penalties and assessments to impose with respect to the misconduct (*i.e.,* the false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims or statements) charged in the complaint: ( 1 ) The number of false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims or statements.
( 2 ) The time period over which such claims or statements were made.
( 3 ) The degree of the defendent's culpability with respect to the misconduct.
( 4 ) The amount of money or the value of the property, services, or benefit falsely claimed.
( 5 ) The value of the Government's actual loss as a result of the misconduct, including foreseeable consequential damages and the costs of investigation.
( 6 ) The relationship of the amount imposed as civil penalties to the amount of the Government's loss.
( 7 ) The potential or actual impact of the misconduct upon national defense, public health or safety, or public confidence in the management of Government programs and operations, including particularly the impact on the intended beneficiaries of such programs.
( 8 ) Whether the defendant has engaged in a pattern of the same or similar misconduct.
( 9 ) Whether the defendant attempted to conceal the misconduct.
( 10 ) The degree to which the defendant has involved others in the misconduct or in concealing it.
( 11 ) If the misconduct of employees or agents is imputed to the defendant, the extent to which the defendant's practices fostered or attempted to preclude the misconduct.
( 12 ) Whether the defendant cooperated in or obstructed an investigation of the misconduct.
( 13 ) Whether the defendant assisted in identifying and prosecuting other wrongdoers.
( 14 ) The complexity of the program or transaction, and the degree of the defendant's sophistication with respect to it, including the extent of the defendant's prior participation in the program or in similar transactions.
( 15 ) Whether the defendant has been found, in any criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding to have engaged in similar misconduct or to have dealt dishonestly with the Government of the United States or of a State, directly or indirectly.
( 16 ) The need to deter the defendant and others from engaging in the same or similar misconduct.
( c ) Nothing in this section may be construed to limit the ALJ or the Department head from considering any other factors that in any given case may mitigate or aggravate the offense for which penalties and assessments are imposed.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3803(a)(2) (e), (f))
APPENDIX A: REQUIRED SUMMARY INFORMATION

A. Applicant Information

 Not a Consortium

 Interstate Consortium

 Intrastate Consortium

 Community now receives EAS subsidy

 Community (or Consortium member) previously received a Small Community Grant

If previous recipient:

Date of Grant: 09/24/2004

Expiration Date of Grant: 03/24/2007

B. Public/Private Partnerships

Public 

St. Joseph County Airport Authority 

State of Indiana 

City of South Bend, Indiana 

Private 

University of Notre Dame 

American Electric Power 

NIPSCO 

Project Future 

C. Project Proposal 

 Marketing Upgrade Aircraft New Route

 Personnel Increase Frequency Low Fare Service

 Travel Bank Service Restoration Subsidy

 Surface Transportation Regional Service Other (specify)

 Revenue Guarantee Launch New Service

 Start-Up Cost Offset First Service

 Study Secure Additional Carrier
D. Existing Landing Aids at Local Airport

 Full ILS Outer/Middle Marker Published Instrument 

Approach

 Localizer Other (specify)

E. Project Cost

Line Description Sub Total Total Amount

1 Federal amount requested: $750,000 

2 State cash financial contribution: $100,000 

Local cash financial contribution:

3a. Airport cash funds:

$ 

125,000 

3b. Non-airport cash funds:

$ 

100,000 

3 Total local cash funds (3a + 3b): $225,000 

4 TOTAL CASH FUNDING (1 + 2 + 3c): $1,075,000 

In-Kind Contribution

5a. Airport In-Kind contribution

$ 

200,000 

5b. Other In-Kind contribution

$ 

50,000 

5 TOTAL IN-KIND CONTRIBUTION (5a+5b): $250,000 

6 TOTAL Project COST $1,325,000 

F. In-Kind Contributions

Airport in-kind contributions include waived landing and lease fees for a start-up period of 2 years. 

Additional efforts by Airport staff will be made to develop community awareness and brand development 

for the airline. These efforts will be ongoing and supplement the marketing and advertising efforts that will 

take place to market the new route. Local community in-kind contributions will take place in the form of inkind media and advertising placement by local media outlets. 
G. Is this application subject to review by state under Executive 

Order 12372 Process?

 a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for 

review on (date):

 b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372, but has not been selected by the State for review.

 c. Program is not covered by E.O. 12372

H. Is this applicant delinquent on any federal debt?

 No

 Yes (explain)

I. Enplanements

2000 432,643 2004 389,386 2008 354,015

2001 372,817 2005 347,509 2009 314,745

2002 408,151 2006 367,750 2010 315,081

2003 401,333 2007 389,562
#### § 463.745 What factors does the State Workforce Development Board use to develop the formula described in Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, which is used by the Governor to determine the appropriate one-stop infrastructure budget for each local area operating under the State infrastructure funding mechanism, if no reasonably implementable locally negotiated budget exists?

The State WDB must develop a formula, as described in WIOA sec. 121(h)(3)(B), to be used by the Governor under § 463.735(b)(3) in determining the appropriate budget for the infrastructure costs of one-stop centers in the local areas that do not reach agreement under the local funding mechanism and are, therefore, subject to the State funding mechanism. The formula identifies the factors and corresponding weights for each factor that the Governor must use, which must include: the number of one-stop centers in a local area; the population served by such centers; the services provided by such centers; and any factors relating to the operations of such centers in the local area that the State WDB determines are appropriate. As indicated in § 463.735(b)(1), if the local area has agreed on such a budget, the Governor may accept that budget in lieu of applying the formula factors.