alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23





HELLER FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS





To Heller Financial, Inc.





As
   independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
   our report dated January 18, 2000 (except with respect to the matters
   discussed in Note 26, as to which the date is February 15, 2000) included in
   this Form 10-K, into the Companys previously filed Registration
   Statement on Form S-3 No. 333-58723. It should be noted that we have not
   audited any financial statements of the Company subsequent to December 31,
   1999 or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our
   report.





/S
 / ARTHUR
 ANDERSEN
 LLP





Chicago, Illinois


February 22, 2000
EXHIBIT 23.1 Consent of Robert Early & Company, P.C.










             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the Form S-8
Registration Statement No. 333-105591 regarding the Stock Compensation
Plan of KleenAir Systems, Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2005 on the
Company's audited financial statements which is being included in the
annual report on Form 10-KSB of KleenAir Systems, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2004.




 /s/ ROBERT EARLY & COMPANY, P.C.
---------------------------------------
Robert Early & Company, P.C.

Abilene, Texas
April 13, 2005






















                                EXHIBIT 23.1
#### § 462.4 What are the transition rules for using tests to measure educational gain for the National Reporting System for Adult Education (NRS)?

A State or an eligible provider may continue to measure educational gain for the NRS using tests that the Secretary has identified in the most recent notice published in the Federal Register until the Secretary announces through a notice published in the Federal Register a date by which such tests may no longer be used.

(Authority: 29 U.S.C. 3292)

[81 FR 55551, Aug. 19, 2016]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 585

 579

 523

 531

 533

 538

 571

 612

 641

 668

 525

 730

 706

 691

 683

 650

 728

 621

 656

 718

 685

 684

 680

 688

 816

 949

 1,012

 1,101

 1,100

 1,072

 1,033

 435

 432

 445

 438

 437

 456

 509

 465

 469

 541

 440

 509

 489

 498

 559

 490

 500

 551

 524

 513

 573

 573

 557

 543

 563

 699

 790

 459

 428

 484

 472

 491

 487

 471

 477

 494

 500

 542

 534

 542

 621

 466

 652

 612

 641

 622

 554

 634

 575

 597

 596

 631

 637

 634

 632

 651

 842

 921

 915

 807

 797

 764

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 9, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 319

 317

 307

 311

 321

 325

 351

 346

 351

 400

 304

 419

 394

 412

 400

 358

 408

 371

 385

 384

 406

 410

 408

 407

 418

 536

 585

 581

 515

 509

 488

TOTAL 19,339

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
### §2723. Penalties

(a) Criminal Fine.—A person who knowingly violates this chapter shall be fined under this title.

(b) Violations by State Department of Motor Vehicles.—Any State department of motor vehicles that has a policy or practice of substantial noncompliance with this chapter shall be subject to a civil penalty imposed by the Attorney General of not more than $5,000 a day for each day of substantial noncompliance.

(Added Pub. L. 103–322, title XXX, §300002(a), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2101.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 3 years after Sept. 13, 1994, with provisions relating to release of personal information before the effective date and compliance after such date, see section 300003 of Pub. L. 103–322, set out as a note under section 2721 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 667

 623

 693

 659

 627

 642

 654

 666

 671

 667

 670

 662

 665

 659

 658

 724

 715

 714

 734

 748

 730

 714

 693

 695

 701

 683

 733

 753

 745

 716

 588

 577

 582

 563

 558

 584

 564

 561

 568

 539

 559

 567

 592

 572

 593

 637

 610

 623

 615

 615

 615

 585

 608

 632

 635

 629

 657

 608

 650

 653

 621

 599

 624

 619

 606

 615

 627

 627

 624

 628

 638

 633

 641

 637

 638

 674

 673

 684

 693

 701

 685

 653

 661

 670

 676

 669

 684

 686

 680

 675

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 23, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 400

 386

 402

 399

 391

 396

 403

 403

 402

 404

 410

 407

 412

 410

 410

 433

 432

 439

 444

 449

 439

 420

 424

 430

 434

 429

 439

 440

 436

 433

TOTAL 19,541

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
#### Broadcast Music, Inc., et al., Respondents, v. Deems Taylor, as President of American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Ho opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
No. 12,409.

#### In re Campbell.

Decided June 24, 1929.

Mr. Herbert E. Mann, for petitioner.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Burke

delivered the opinion of the court.

Petitioner is in jail in El Paso county for contempt of the district court in failing to pay temporary alimony, etc., as it ordered. He makes a showing here of his inability to comply with the order, and contends that that court was, andi is, without jurisdiction to make or enforce it because he has a valid motion for a change of venue on file in the cause and undisposed of.

If so, he is not entitled to his release, but to mandamus to compel the trial court to rule on that motion. We are, however, precluded from considering this ap*185plication as one for that writ, or granting petitioner any other relief herein, hy his own conduct as evidenced by his application.

“Such a motion (for change of venue) must be made as soon as the moving party acquires knowledge of the facts upon which the motion is based.” *Kirby v. Union Pacific Co.,*51 Colo. 509, 541, 119 Pac. 1042. Petitioner was served with summons in the divorce action April 20, 1929. The order complained of was entered May 20 thereafter and the writ of commitment, under which he is now held, one week later. EGis motion was not filed until May 22, at which time he had either answered or was in default. Since it is based upon his residence and place of service, he knew the facts at the time he was served, and, under the Kirby case, supra, repeatedly reaffirmed by us, he has waived his right to the change.

His application is accordingly denied.
Case 17-35621-KRH Doc 71 Filed 11/02/21 Entered 11/02/21 13:38:37 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 9
Case 17-35621-KRH Doc 71 Filed 11/02/21 Entered 11/02/21 13:38:37 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 9
Case 17-35621-KRH Doc 71 Filed 11/02/21 Entered 11/02/21 13:38:37 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 9
Case 17-35621-KRH Doc 71 Filed 11/02/21 Entered 11/02/21 13:38:37 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 9
Case 17-35621-KRH Doc 71 Filed 11/02/21 Entered 11/02/21 13:38:37 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 9
Case 17-35621-KRH Doc 71 Filed 11/02/21 Entered 11/02/21 13:38:37 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 9
Case 17-35621-KRH Doc 71 Filed 11/02/21 Entered 11/02/21 13:38:37 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 9
Case 17-35621-KRH Doc 71 Filed 11/02/21 Entered 11/02/21 13:38:37 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 9
Case 17-35621-KRH Doc 71 Filed 11/02/21 Entered 11/02/21 13:38:37 Desc Main

Document Page 9 of 9
NEWYORK 

# Department of STATE OF OPPORTUNITY 

# Transportation

ANDREW M. CUOMO JOAN McDONALD Governor Commissioner

March 5. 2015 Ms. Molly W. Smith Office of Aviation Policy and Plans APO-001 Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591
Dear Ms. Smith: The New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) requests an extension of the comment period for pocket No. FAA-2014-1073, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), Slot Management and Transparency for LaGuardia Airport, John F. Kennedy International Airport and Newark Liberty International Airport. The notice instituting this proceeding directs that comments be filed on or before April 8, 2015. NYSDOT hereby requests that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) extend the comment period for an additional 60 days. NYSDOT's interest in this NPRM is two-fold. First, NYSDOT owns two airports in the New York metropolitan region, (Republic Airport in Farmingdale and Stewart Airport in Newburgh). While these two airports are not slot-controlled, the FAA policies governing LaGuardia, John F. Kennedy International, and Newark Liberty International airports have regional effects that may impact the two state-owned airports. Second, NYSDOT is hopeful that the reform of the slot program may create opportunities for utilizing more slots within the region and in communities with commercial air senrice in upstate New York.NYSDOT appreciates FAA's efforts in developing the NPRM. It is clear that during this multiyear endeavor, FAA staff spent time and effort to examine the many complex issues related to slot management. NYSDOT is particularly pleased that the proposed rule notes that the U.S. Department of Transportation will be involved in reviewing slot transactions as they potentially impact competition, public interest, and senrice to small communities. Given the breadth of the issues that the FAA has asked for comment and the importance of this effort for the aviation industry, I respectfully request an extension of 60-days in which to submit comments.
Sincerely, 

# 6

oan McDonald ommissioner

50 Wolf Road, Albany, NY 12232 1 www.dot.ny.gov
### Theriosynoecum wyomingense (Branson, 1935), a possible guide ostracode to the Salt Wash member of the Morrison Formation

By: I. G. SohnRaymond Elliott Peck

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1161A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### James Pollitz v. Wabash Railroad Company. James Pollitz v. Equitable Trust Company.

Motions granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
#### Ellen Condran, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Park & Tilford, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.; Ingraham, P. J., dissenting.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of VitalStream Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jack L. Waterman,
      Chief Executive Officer & Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.







/s/
      Jack L. Waterman


Jack
      L.
      Waterman


Chief
      Executive Officer & Chairman (Principal Executive Officer)


April
      28,
      2006





This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,119
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,931
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (254)
<INVENTORY>                                    2,023
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,496
<PP&E>                                         2,653
<DEPRECIATION>                                (1,164)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,049
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                          82
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,432
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,768
<SALES>                                       22,604
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              22,638
<CGS>                                        (15,198)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (15,198)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (5,932)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (475)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,033
<INCOME-TAX>                                     187
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,220
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .15


</TABLE>
#### Peter DuChessi, Respondent, v. Dominic D’Alesandro et al., Appellants.

All concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 725

 732

 739

 744

 751

 762

 803

 801

 758

 760

 761

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 821

 785

 786

 812

 811

 807

 807

 806

 812

 823

 831

 835

 843

 848

 851

 711

 717

 733

 736

 744

 753

 762

 756

 755

 758

 759

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 787

 749

 749

 787

 799

 803

 797

 797

 792

 808

 817

 813

 830

 525

 674

 715

 728

 735

 739

 747

 757

 788

 775

 757

 759

 760

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 808

 766

 769

 799

 805

 806

 802

 801

 806

 817

 825

 831

 839

 802

 829

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 458

 466

 470

 473

 478

 484

 503

 495

 484

 485

 486

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 515

 489

 491

 510

 513

 514

 512

 511

 514

 521

 526

 530

 535

 512

 528

TOTAL 20,365

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
§ 463.60 What are programs for Corrections Education and the Education of other Institutionalized Individuals? ( a ) Authorized under section 225 of the Act, programs for corrections education and the education of other institutionalized individuals require each eligible agency to carry out corrections education and education for other institutionalized individuals using funds provided under section 222 of the Act.
( b ) The funds described in paragraph (a) of this section must be used for the cost of educational programs for criminal offenders in correctional institutions and other institutionalized individuals, including academic programs for— ( 1 ) Adult education and literacy activities;
( 2 ) Special education, as determined by the eligible agency;
( 3 ) Secondary school credit;
( 4 ) Integrated education and training;
( 5 ) Career pathways;
( 6 ) Concurrent enrollment;
( 7 ) Peer tutoring; and
( 8 ) Transition to re-entry initiatives and other post-release-services with the goal of reducing recidivism.
(Authority: 29 U.S.C. 3302, 3305)
!"

	
 #$%&$$

'()*

+#$
	


	

%$,+

'(*

&$-!$

*'

..-	/$ 

	

01/$"
01/$")) *)&$,$
,	)

234
).56. !
$75)*6')

4 
).56.)* 234 
'(''6)

4 
'56()*




	
	



	













8$4  3$))



9/&:!9!:;#
80




)  0)*65.
<=#



>$  
%$







	



		
	


;3 
 ?@

 A > 63  >$  3  


?>$@
"7$A$$
?:$$@B7$B	 #$


$A	A$C	$ 7D	$ $$3	$	

) 2>$
71A	$7A>$EA$BA	>$


$49>$9$	3
8
(.C9>$8$$3$
)'5C9>$-7

$3$
5).C9>$+8
(.C96$"
8
('.*C9>$:3$
8


('(5C9>$$>	
8
((*C9>$	A	$7
8
('('C9>$!,$


==
('()C96$
==
.C9>$8
==
)).2>$E$ $)

,,$
,	
,$
A$*').

 3F$	>	$1A$ 7$>



Case 19-30258-KLP Doc 922 Filed 07/30/19 Entered 07/30/19 14:12:16 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 4
;,GG).)55'	




	

		




					
%	)
)*'C	$ 7A	

$A$$1$888A;,	C

	$  7 A	 	 A 3$7 $ 3$3$

3	$	;,GG)')'*C	$ 7A	$A$	

>$A>$E
$$$
$3$

$C	$ 7A	>$EA133$3$

$>3$ C	$ 7$1 7

$	33$A$A$	$$7>A$	$C

	$ 7$7A	>A$

$7>D		A$$A7$$C	3A3$7

>A$   	$C    A$  	 >$    	AA  	 33$7  $A$
    




) 27$A$$

 #	$	)))
A&"$	3>$EB	 7

#$    $>  B $	7    	7  ,3>$  )'
  )*   $  B	 

,#$$>B$	7	70 >$)5
)*

5 $A:$$3$D	>$E$7"A	$$BA

B	 #$A$	$3	$	)))
A&"$	3

>$$33$3$

' 0A3$ $>7	AA

A	$	$A&"$	3!	('
$A>	

'56(()6(* . 

Case 19-30258-KLP Doc 922 Filed 07/30/19 Entered 07/30/19 14:12:16 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 4
. 017&"$	3!	('

$A:$$$

AA A$>	3$

( 2 >$  $ 	$F  "     $  AA	 $A

7$:$$

 2	$$B	 D	$1$3$$7A$$

$3
$3$
A$A:$$

4HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH



!
$7 ;082,22,&0<!;#2/%;9

+,<:!2-8,4

   !	
"#






#$%&$$

'()*

%$,+

'(*

&$-!$

*'



	

*)&$,$
,	)

!
$75)*6')

234 
'(''6)

4 
'56()*

66

	
	


 !"

	


+#$
	


	

..-	/$

01/$"
01/$"))

234 
).56.

4 
).56.)*




	
	

'56(()6(* . 5

Jul 29 2019

/s/ Keith L Phillips

Entered on Docket: Jul 30 2019

Case 19-30258-KLP Doc 922 Filed 07/30/19 Entered 07/30/19 14:12:16 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 4





  


	
  

#	$	    =  &"$	3  !	*6)

  8  $>  $A     A$77

3$3$$>$>$$ 	3$3$

  !	
"#


'56(()6(* . '

Case 19-30258-KLP Doc 922 Filed 07/30/19 Entered 07/30/19 14:12:16 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 4
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Reflect Scientific, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), We, Kim Boyce, our Chief Executive Officer and director and Keith Merrell, our Chief/Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: 05/12/2011                            /s/Kim Boyce

                                                           Kim Boyce

                                                           Chief Executive Officer and Director

Dated: 05/12/2011                           /s/Keith Merrell

                                                          Keith Merrell

                                                          Principal Financial Officer and CFO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

DEBBIE COFFEY

,

Plaintiff

,

v.

UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND

MANAGEMENT

,

Defendant

. Civil Action No. 16

- cv

- 564 (CRC) (DAR )

ORDER

Upon careful consideration of the record in this case and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

Recommendation filed August 31, 2018 , and hearing no objections from the Plaintiff within the

extended timeframe for filing objections, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report of the Magistrate

Judge and ACCEPTS her Recommendation. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that [19 ] Plaintiff’s Motion for Award of Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees and

Costs be DENIED

.

SO ORDERED.

Date: October 1, 2018

CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER

United States District Judge
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 422

 407

 417

 400

 396

 391

 330

 404

 390

 392

 387

 435

 378

 404

 409

 381

 367

 397

 436

 534

 534

 396

 581

 555

 639

 387

 525

 480

 621

 617

 352

 369

 377

 375

 364

 263

 243

 320

 348

 338

 340

 381

 344

 356

 365

 320

 291

 325

 336

 338

 369

 329

 329

 261

 336

 324

 394

 309

 310

 274

 377

 386

 398

 388

 377

 346

 280

 374

 370

 356

 358

 403

 358

 382

 386

 353

 332

 373

 388

 440

 420

 354

 433

 459

 465

 339

 472

 349

 431

 400

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 11, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 249

 255

 262

 256

 249

 230

 189

 247

 245

 236

 237

 265

 237

 252

 255

 234

 221

 247

 256

 288

 276

 235

 284

 300

 303

 226

 308

 232

 282

 263

TOTAL 11,547

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 451

 426

 429

 420

 424

 447

 446

 442

 453

 459

 453

 442

 421

 398

 389

 395

 395

 399

 398

 415

 422

 434

 449

 446

 444

 431

 414

 396

 397

 398

 409

 240

 264

 278

 277

 285

 292

 231

 236

 250

 255

 267

 266

 281

 279

 281

 290

 280

 279

 286

 284

 292

 288

 288

 298

 287

 279

 287

 290

 288

 293

 294

 335

 334

 340

 338

 338

 341

 319

 305

 316

 331

 338

 331

 338

 332

 321

 335

 339

 327

 325

 326

 336

 342

 360

 365

 344

 343

 332

 327

 330

 336

 341

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 11, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 223

 222

 226

 225

 225

 227

 213

 204

 211

 221

 225

 221

 225

 221

 214

 223

 226

 218

 217

 217

 224

 227

 238

 242

 229

 228

 221

 218

 220

 224

 227

TOTAL 10,365

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21