alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 227—SENTENCES**

Subchapter
Sec. 1

A.
General Provisions
3551
B.
Probation
3561
C.
Fines
3571
D.
Imprisonment
3581

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior chapter 227 (§3561 et seq.) was repealed (except sections 3577 to 3580 which were renumbered sections 3661 to 3664, respectively), by Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §§212(a)(1), (2), 235(a)(1), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1987, 2031, as amended, effective Nov. 1, 1987, and applicable only to offenses committed after the taking effect of such repeal. See Effective Date note set out under section 3551 of this title.

Section 3561, act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 837, related to judgment form and entry—(Rule).

Section 3562, act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 837, related to sentence—(Rule).

Section 3563, act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 837, related to corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.

Section 3564, act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 837, related to pillory and whipping.

Section 3565, acts June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 837; Oct. 12, 1984, Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §§235(a)(1), 238(g)(1), (i), 98 Stat. 2031, 2039; Oct. 30, 1984, Pub. L. 98–596, §§2, 12(a)(7)(A), (9), (b), 98 Stat. 3134, 3139, 3140; Oct. 22, 1986, Pub. L. 99–514, §2, 100 Stat. 2095, related to collection and payment of fines and penalties.

Section 3566, act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 837, related to execution of death sentence.

Section 3567, act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 838, related to death sentence may prescribe dissection.

Section 3568, acts June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 838; Sept. 2, 1960, Pub. L. 86–691, §1(a), 74 Stat. 738; June 22, 1966, Pub. L. 89–465, §4, 80 Stat. 217, related to effective date of sentence and credit for time in custody prior to the imposition of sentence.

Section 3569, acts June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 838; Oct. 17, 1968, Pub. L. 90–578, title III, §301(a)(1), (3), 82 Stat. 1115; Oct. 12, 1984, Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §§235(a)(1), 238(h), (i), 98 Stat. 2031, 2039; Oct. 30, 1984, Pub. L. 98–596, §§3, 12(a)(8), (9), (b), 98 Stat. 3136, 3139, 3140, related to discharge of indigent prisoner.

Section 3570, act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 839, related to presidential remission as affecting unremitted part.

Section 3571, act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 839, related to clerical mistakes—(Rule).

Section 3572, act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 839, related to correction or reduction of sentence—(Rule).

Section 3573, act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 839, related to arrest or setting aside of judgment—(Rule).

Section 3574, act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 839, related to stay of execution and supersedeas—(Rule).

Section 3575, added Pub. L. 91–452, title X, §1001(a), Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 948, related to increased sentence for dangerous special offenders.

Section 3576, added Pub. L. 91–452, title X, §1001(a), Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 950, related to review of sentence.

Section 3577 renumbered section 3661 of this title.

Section 3578 renumbered section 3662 of this title.

Section 3579 renumbered section 3663 of this title.

Section 3580 renumbered section 3664 of this title.

1  Editorially supplied.
EXHIBIT
      10.5

     

    
      
        		GE Healthcare
                Financial Services


      

      
        
          

        

      

    

    


    


    AMENDMENT
      TO SCHEDULE DATED AS OF 02/12/2006

    TO
      MASTER LEASE AGREEMENT
      DATED AS OF
      06/24/2003

    INTERNAL
      CONTRACT REFERENCE NUMBER
      8541217-003

    


    This
      is
      an Amendment dated as of 10/15/2007
      to
      the
      Schedule and Master Lease Agreement
      referenced above between General Electric Capital Corporation
      (“Lessor”)
      and
      The Sagemark Companies, LTD. (“Lessee’).
      

    


    The
      Term
      of Schedule and Monthly Installment Sections are hereby amended as
      follows:

    


    Original
      - Term Of Schedule: 84 Months

    


    Amended
      - Term of Schedule: 87 Months 

     

    Original
      - Monthly Installment: 5 Months @ $0.00, 6 Months @ $18,452.64, 1 Month @
      $38,670.80, 72 Months @ $38,670; plus applicable taxes

     

    Amended
      - Monthly Installment: 5 Months @ $0.00, 6 Months @ $18,452.64, 4 Month @
      $38,670.80, 3 Months @ $16,081.69 (Monthly Interest Payment), 69 Months @
      $38,670.80; plus applicable taxes

     

    EXCEPT
      AS
      PROVIDED IN THIS AMENDMENT, ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE ABOVE
      REFERENCED SCHEDULE REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT AS ORIGINALLY
      WRITTEN.

    


    
      	Lessor: 	Lessee: 
	 	 
	
              General
                Electric Capital Corporation

            	
              The
                Sagemark Companies, LTD.

            
	 	 
	
              By:
                /s/ David Handke

            	
              By:
                /s/ George W. Mahoney

            
	 	 
	
              Print
                Name: David Handke

            	
              Print
                Name: George W. Mahoney

            
	 	 
	
              Title:
                Duly Authorized Signatory

            	
              Title:
                Chief Financial Officer
§ 327.2 Procedure for naturalization. ( a ) *Application.* An applicant who is eligible for naturalization pursuant to section 327 of the Act and § 327.1 shall submit an Application for Naturalization, Form N-400, in accordance with § 316.4 of this chapter. Such application must be accompanied by a statement describing the applicant's eligibility under § 327.1 (a), (b), and (c) and any available documentation to establish those facts.
( b ) *Oath of Allegiance.* Upon naturalization of the applicant, the district director shall transmit a copy of the oath of allegiance taken by the applicant to the Department of State.
[56 FR 50492, Oct. 7, 1991, as amended at 74 FR 26941, June 5, 2009]
# CE2004070EN.01024001.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/240 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/240

---

(2004/C 70 E/258)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3211/03

by Mogens Camre (UEN) to the Commission

(30 October 2003)

Subject:   EU support for the European Network Against Racism (ENAR)

Subject:

In a series of articles between 13 and 17 October 2003, the Danish newspaper Ekstra Bladet exposed a host of cases of irregularities concerning accounts, falsification of membership figures, etc. within Denmark's largest immigrants' organisation, Paraplyorganisationen for de Etniske Mindretal (ethnic minorities' umbrella organisation), or POEM.

As a result of the disclosure of the many irregularities within POEM, all public bodies in Denmark have discontinued financial support for the organisation. As indicated in an earlier question to the Commission (dated 15 October 2003), POEM has also received monies from the European Social Fund. In an article in the 17 October 2003 edition, Ekstra Bladet states that the POEM chairman, Bashy Quraishy, who, according to Ekstra Bladet, cannot have been unaware of what was large-scale fraud and in all probability was very much a party to it, also chairs the international organisation European Network Against Racism (ENAR). The article explains that ENAR is EU-funded.

In the light of Danish immigrant organisations' large-scale defrauding of public monies, can the Commission say how much ENAR receives each year by way of EU support and what checks are made to prevent misappropriation of funds by the organisation? Can the Commission furthermore say what the consequences will be, in terms of future EU funding allocations, of any involvement by Bashy Quraishy in the above-mentioned fraud?

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(15 December 2003)

(15 December 2003)

‘Stichting Steun European Network Against Racism’ (ENAR) is one of the organisations which receive an operating grant from the Commission under the Community Action Programme to combat discrimination 2001-2006. For the period 2003-2004, ENAR is scheduled to receive an amount of EUR 851 241 towards its operating costs.

ENAR has not received any European Social Fund co-financing under Objective 2 or 3 or Equal during the current 2000-2006 programme period.

The Commission has audited all Community funding paid to ENAR in 2003. There were no irregularities found. The Commission points out that the finances of ENAR are completely separate to the finances of POEM, which is a different organisation. The role of the President of ENAR is an honorary one and, consequently, the President does not receive payment for services rendered.

---
### §539m–12. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out sections 539m to 539m–12 of this title, including such sums as are necessary for the Forest Service to carry out responsibilities of the Forest Service in accordance with section 539m–11(c) of this title.

(Pub. L. 108–7, div. F, title IV, §414, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 294.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 539m to 539m–12 of this title, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title IV of div. F of Pub. L. 108–7, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 279, which is classified generally to sections 539m to 539m–12 of this title. For complete classification of title IV to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 539m of this title and Tables.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**Certification ofPrincipal Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350**

**(Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

I, DavidC. Karlgaard, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executiveofficer) of PEC Solutions, Inc. (the “Registrant”), certify that to thebest of my knowledge, based upon review of the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 of the Registrant (the“Report”):

 
| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                      |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Registrant. |

 

 
| /s/   DAVID C. KARLGAARD |               |
|-------------------------------|--------------------|
| Name:                         | David C. Karlgaard |
| Date:                         | May 10, 2004       |
|                               |                    |  |

 

----
#### Robert SPURLOCK, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the AIR FORCE, Respondent.

No. 01-3379.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 4, 2002.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 19 - 0317

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KRISTOFER BUTLER,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Peter B. Ohman , District Ju dge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 31 2021

03/31/2021
Case Number: DA 19-0317
### Petrochemistry and bedrock geology of the Fitchville quadrangle, Connecticut

By: George L. Snyder

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1161I

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 204.304 Improper inducement prohibited. ( a ) *Prohibited payments.* Neither the applicant/petitioner, nor any individual or entity acting on behalf of the applicant/petitioner may, directly or indirectly, pay, give, offer to pay, or offer to give to any individual or entity or request, receive, or accept from any individual or entity, any money (in any amount) or anything of value (whether the value is great or small), directly or indirectly, to induce or influence any decision concerning: ( 1 ) The placement of a child for adoption;
( 2 ) The consent of a parent, a legal custodian, individual, or agency to the adoption of a child;
( 3 ) The relinquishment of a child to a competent authority, or to an agency or person as defined in 22 CFR 96.2, for the purpose of adoption; or
( 4 ) The performance by the child's parent or parents of any act that makes the child a Convention adoptee.
( b ) *Permissible payments.* Paragraph (a) of this section does not prohibit an applicant/petitioner, or an individual or entity acting on behalf of an applicant/petitioner, from paying the reasonable costs incurred for the services designated in this paragraph. A payment is not reasonable if it is prohibited under the law of the country in which the payment is made or if the amount of the payment is not commensurate with the costs for professional and other services in the country in which any particular service is provided. The permissible services are: ( 1 ) The services of an adoption service provider in connection with an adoption;
( 2 ) Expenses incurred in locating a child for adoption;
( 3 ) Medical, hospital, nursing, pharmaceutical, travel, or other similar expenses incurred by a mother or her child in connection with the birth or any illness of the child;
( 4 ) Counseling services for a parent or a child for a reasonable time before and after the child's placement for adoption;
( 5 ) Expenses, in an amount commensurate with the living standards in the country of the child's habitual residence, for the care of the birth mother while pregnant and immediately following the birth of the child;
( 6 ) Expenses incurred in obtaining the home study;
( 7 ) Expenses incurred in obtaining the reports on the child as described in 8 CFR 204.313(d)(3) and (4);
( 8 ) Legal services, court costs, and travel or other administrative expenses connected with an adoption, including any legal services performed for a parent who consents to the adoption of a child or relinquishes the child to an agency; and
( 9 ) Any other service the payment for which the officer finds, on the basis of the facts of the case, was reasonably necessary.
( c ) *Department of State requirements.* See 22 CFR 96.34, 96.36 and 96.40 for additional regulatory information concerning fees in relation to Convention adoptions.
#### Marie E. Smith, Respondent, v. Bernard Tobias, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant the motion, on condition that defendant pays a full bill of costs and that the judgment be allowed to stand as security.
§ 303.422 Surrogate parents. ( a ) *General.* Each lead agency or other public agency must ensure that the rights of a child are protected when— ( 1 ) No parent (as defined in § 303.27) can be identified;
( 2 ) The lead agency or other public agency, after reasonable efforts, cannot locate a parent; or
( 3 ) The child is a ward of the State under the laws of that State.
( b ) *Duty of lead agency and other public agencies.* ( 1 ) The duty of the lead agency, or other public agency under paragraph (a) of this section, includes the assignment of an individual to act as a surrogate for the parent. This assignment process must include a method for— ( i ) Determining whether a child needs a surrogate parent; and
( ii ) Assigning a surrogate parent to the child.
( 2 ) In implementing the provisions under this section for children who are wards of the State or placed in foster care, the lead agency must consult with the public agency that has been assigned care of the child.
( c ) *Wards of the State.* In the case of a child who is a ward of the State, the surrogate parent, instead of being appointed by the lead agency under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, may be appointed by the judge overseeing the infant or toddler's case provided that the surrogate parent meets the requirements in paragraphs (d)(2)(i) and (e) of this section.
( d ) *Criteria for selection of surrogate parents.* ( 1 ) The lead agency or other public agency may select a surrogate parent in any way permitted under State law.
( 2 ) Public agencies must ensure that a person selected as a surrogate parent— ( i ) Is not an employee of the lead agency or any other public agency or EIS provider that provides early intervention services, education, care, or other services to the child or any family member of the child;
( ii ) Has no personal or professional interest that conflicts with the interest of the child he or she represents; and
( iii ) Has knowledge and skills that ensure adequate representation of the child.
( e ) *Non-employee requirement; compensation.* A person who is otherwise qualified to be a surrogate parent under paragraph (d) of this section is not an employee of the agency solely because he or she is paid by the agency to serve as a surrogate parent.
( f ) *Surrogate parent responsibilities.* The surrogate parent has the same rights as a parent for all purposes under this part.
( g ) *Lead agency responsibility.* The lead agency must make reasonable efforts to ensure the assignment of a surrogate parent not more than 30 days after a public agency determines that the child needs a surrogate parent.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1439(a)(5))
### §229E. Requests for military assistance to enforce prohibition in certain emergencies

The Attorney General may request the Secretary of Defense to provide assistance under section 382 of title 10 1 in support of Department of Justice activities relating to the enforcement of section 229 of this title in an emergency situation involving a chemical weapon. The authority to make such a request may be exercised by another official of the Department of Justice in accordance with section 382(f)(2) of title 10.1

(Added Pub. L. 105–277, div. I, title II, §201(a), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–869.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 382 of title 10, referred to in text, was renumbered section 282 of title 10, Armed Forces, by Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XII, §1241(a)(2), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2497.

1 See References in Text note below.
§ 312.5 Failure to meet educational and literacy requirements. ( a ) An applicant for naturalization who fails the English literacy or history and government test at the first examination will be afforded a second opportunity to pass the test(s) within 90 days after the first examination during the pendency of the application.
( b ) If an applicant who receives notice of the second scheduled examination date fails to appear without good cause for that second examination without prior notification to the Service, the applicant will be deemed to have failed this second examination. Before an applicant may request a postponement of the second examination to a date that is more than 90 days after the initial examination, the applicant must agree in writing to waive the requirement under section 336 of the Act that the Service must render a determination on the application within 120 days from the initial interview, and instead to permit the Service to render a decision within 120 days from the second interview.
[56 FR 50481, Oct. 7, 1991, as amended at 58 FR 49912, Sept. 24, 1993]
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Q Comm International,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael K. Openshaw, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

          A signed  original of this written  statement has been provided to the
     Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
     staff upon request.


/s/ Michael K. Openshaw
-----------------------

Michael K. Openshaw
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)

May 13, 2004