alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RECEIVED SN tl, • 1 —COURUJEOIMNAUAPPSIUS : FILED IN 

### AteTgo// Pfrfr ^bH&At^W&^^LAPPEAL 

## AbelAcoSa^ • "~*~(jRl0tl\tAt Abe)Acosta. cZu r . ~ ^^ 

### fr Cc?4- gS-l^opftg-fcft drfrf-fot gfKm g(L C^kAi /Hurler,

r<*t t\~ ow Wr oQIntern, 

### 0f\ /v^n^bir^Hj ivtyjw Q?wr4- p-t- trfa(\w\ &\f>peoi\r relww hjxr<tf(4*or\ r-Wthst 

### ^< &? l/jf^ oi ihe CcW+r J&M*, A, Sn*^*n rs&m ^<^ x-U/yU£15

^^^ V/~ te((pho^ \-efi-L ^r ngf_ bv\rm\ej-rbt^M fhCrecwj j hPveJ KiV ^* c*i\ p^r)j rUofj) w>xfi P\t &^ v^s U> bt aufrW* ^W^^ auib^V^k ^ g© &«&/«.

6, T^HWipe^Af/^^ ^^^ i^e Cd?tv/- 4© (WP^ f^^ <Wfc^/ ^)C f^ ^u^e

### Whfvted pre^/j-gj- C^jftfc/^ Vinton? prqCT He Cgc^ii^H- K^ l^i;^ £>r rei^e^A^ oy„ urevrf* Kaj pe^/V? W <WgfAyw refc/eu^ fa W> ^^yg» fry^^Hy j^^ Pv^^^Ct^ P*nrfi b<^rs \&<4£[\ 

### ^^foo UVA Vio^f U -35 xjl 4b/(f0P; 1-y^fo/ *AtfcJ % hfyf ?n^^^fV|tj C/^c u^j-.fftpc (r <



### irv\(4»e/V) C^ fW+S caw >\&^ -f#J dHue0"Hi J"Hlyjjci/) Kfoi rp W^hqCj C/Vc^/h^^n^ i^wA 

### sQ i\^ ^£i£ C Is**- C/Vfri Ap/>fc,iJ (V j^cfjL ^ UWfe/bA ^ **^ /w* *V/ Cn*? (^ ^ UrwK M\ ht\~ fry/?/1 fl/t^ ^0^7 V<y<f Aof^ l» h01^ fiWo+fJ oh*. °he>^i 

### hh«wt4tf. P*~fc i^- 

### _^7lfA7 $51*. Mfr^gjtfl^fe/ fortyft* cctff QLstrW 

## Prc^foft .IWj /Krffa^tX V^t «*<* iht ^H^' Ctftv)^ ^cy^wt^y^ Pu^^iU^
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 775

 771

 780

 786

 790

 811

 825

 840

 843

 808

 805

 795

 839

 741

 812

 900

 789

 737

 750

 862

 873

 862

 887

 797

 813

 751

 759

 816

 845

 878

 904

 583

 586

 571

 586

 594

 617

 647

 665

 703

 661

 629

 659

 634

 656

 681

 809

 627

 670

 689

 699

 676

 676

 738

 688

 706

 673

 676

 735

 677

 649

 606

 637

 643

 658

 677

 676

 698

 717

 739

 756

 712

 716

 702

 735

 695

 714

 870

 679

 709

 723

 741

 774

 784

 803

 725

 735

 719

 732

 775

 765

 758

 734

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 7, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 410

 413

 423

 434

 434

 447

 459

 473

 483

 456

 458

 450

 470

 446

 457

 554

 436

 454

 463

 474

 494

 501

 512

 464

 470

 460

 468

 495

 489

 484

 470

TOTAL 22,501

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
#### Gayle Z. Combs, as Administrator of the Estate of Flora E. Combs, Deceased, Respondent, v. Carl Frey et al., Appellants.

Present — Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A copy of the foregoing document has been served this 4th day of June, 2013, upon 

the following persons via email:

francis.heil@aa.com

robert.wirick@aa.com 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

howard.kass@usairways.com

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com

thomas.bolling@united.com

dan.weiss@united.com

todd.homan@dot.gov

peter.irvine@dot.gov

reese.davidson@dot.gov

bob.goldner@dot.gov

paul.gretch@dot.gov

esta.rosenberg@dot.gov

Jill.Ptacek@usdoj.gov

urskr@state.gov

Ishiwata.K@portseattle.org

joe.cambron@wcaa.us

brubinst@panynj.gov

jason.terreri@atlanta-airport.com

info@airlineinfo.com
§ 280.32 How is priority given to applicants? ( a ) *How priority is given.* In addition to the points awarded under § 280.31, the Secretary gives priority to the factors listed in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section by awarding additional points for these factors. The Secretary indicates in the application notice published in the Federal Register how these additional points will be distributed.
( b ) *Need for assistance.* The Secretary evaluates the applicant's need for assistance under this part, by considering— ( 1 ) The costs of fully implementing the magnet schools project as proposed;
( 2 ) The resources available to the applicant to carry out the project if funds under the program were not provided;
( 3 ) The extent to which the costs of the project exceed the applicant's resources; and
( 4 ) The difficulty of effectively carrying out the approved plan and the project for which assistance is sought, including consideration of how the design of the magnet school project—e.g., the type of program proposed, the location of the magnet school within the LEA—impacts on the applicant's ability to successfully carry out the approved plan.
( c ) *New or revised magnet schools projects.* The Secretary determines the extent to which the applicant proposes to carry out new magnet schools projects or significantly revise existing magnet schools projects.
( d ) *Selection of students.* The Secretary determines the extent to which the applicant proposes to select students to attend magnet schools by methods such as lottery, rather than through academic examination.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7231e))
[57 FR 61510, Dec. 24, 1992, as amended at 60 FR 14866, Mar. 20, 1995; 63 FR 8020, Feb. 17, 1998; 69 FR 4997, Feb. 2, 2004]
1 

### Ngo, Dan (FAA)

From: Ngo, Dan (FAA)

Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 4:43 PM

To: 'murrell.robert@gmail.com'

Subject: Petition for Exemption - Aerialspecs, Inc (FAA-2015-0222)

June 2, 2015

Dear Mr. Murrell:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

‐ 2015

‐ 0222). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make, model, and type (i.e.

‐ fixed

‐ wing, rotorcraft, lighter

‐ than

‐ air) for the proposed UAS

operation. The description should include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be

located in the aircraft manual.

Please submit the additional information (non

‐ proprietary) as a comment to your docket at www.regulations.gov and

submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e

‐ mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by June 16, 2015. If

we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

Regards,

Dan Ngo
### §2290. Jurisdiction and scope

(a) Jurisdiction.—There is jurisdiction, including extraterritorial jurisdiction, over an offense under this chapter if the prohibited activity takes place—

(1) within the United States and within waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States; or

(2) outside United States and—

(A) an offender or a victim is a national of the United States (as that term is defined under section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22)); 1

(B) the activity involves a vessel in which a national of the United States was on board; or

(C) the activity involves a vessel of the United States (as that term is defined under section 2 2 of the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46 U.S.C. App. 1903).1

(b) Scope.—Nothing in this chapter shall apply to otherwise lawful activities carried out by or at the direction of the United States Government.

(Added Pub. L. 109–177, title III, §306(a), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 237.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 2 of the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(2)(C), probably means section 3 of the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act, Pub. L. 96–350, which was classified to section 1903 of former Title 46, Appendix, Shipping, and was repealed and restated in sections 70502 to 70506 of Title 46, Shipping, by Pub. L. 109–304, §§10(2), 19, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1683, 1710. Section 70502(b) of Title 46 defines "vessel of the United States".

1 So in original. There probably should be an additional closing parenthesis.

2 See References in Text note below.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gravitas International, Inc. a
Florida corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March
31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), Robin Lecky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Gravitas International, Inc., and will be retained by Gravitas
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


/s/ Robin Lecky
--------------------------
Robin Lecky
Chief Executive Officer
Dec. 28 2003


<PAGE>
§ 33.1 Basis and purpose. ( a ) *Basis.* This part implements the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-509, 6101 through 6104, 100 Stat. 16674 (October 21, 1986), to be codified at 31 U.S.C. 3801 through 3812. This law (31 U.S.C. 3809) requires each Federal department head to promulgate regulations necessary to implement the provisions of the statute. (Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3809)
( b ) *Purpose.* This part: ( 1 ) Establishes administrative procedures for imposing civil penalties and assessments against persons who make, submit, or present, or cause to be made, submitted, or presented, false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims or written statements to the Department or to its agents; and
( 2 ) Specifies the hearing and appeal rights of persons subject to allegations of liability for those penalties and assessments.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3809)
### §582a–4. Regulations; advice and assistance; appointment, membership, etc., of council

#### (a) Regulations and assistance

The Secretary shall prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to carry out this subchapter and to furnish such advice and assistance through a cooperative State forestry research unit in the Department as will best promote the purposes of this subchapter.

#### (b) Advisory council

The Secretary shall appoint a council of not fewer than sixteen members which shall be constituted to give representation to Federal and State agencies concerned with developing and utilizing the Nation's forest resources, the forest industries, the forestry schools of the State-certified eligible institutions, State agricultural experiment stations, and volunteer public groups concerned with forests and related natural resources. The council shall meet at least annually and shall submit a report to the Secretary on regional and national planning and coordination of forestry research within the Federal and State agencies, forestry schools, and the forest industries, and shall advise the Secretary on the apportionment of funds. The Secretary shall seek, at least once each year, the advice of the council to accomplish efficiently the purposes of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 87–788, §5, Oct. 10, 1962, 76 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 97–98, title XIV, §1441(c), Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1320.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1981—Pub. L. 97–98 substituted provisions directing the Secretary to promulgate necessary regulations, furnish necessary advice and assistance, and appoint a council of no fewer than sixteen members in order to give representation to Federal and State agencies in developing cooperative State forestry programs for provisions which had directed the Secretary to make apportionments among participating States only after consulting with a national advisory board of not less than seven officials of the forestry schools of the State-certified eligible colleges and universities chosen by a majority of such schools. See section 582a–5 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1981 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–98 effective Dec. 22, 1981, see section 1801 of Pub. L. 97–98, set out as an Effective Date note under section 4301 of Title 7, Agriculture.

#### Termination of Advisory Councils

Advisory councils established after Jan. 5, 1973, to terminate not later than the expiration of the 2-year period beginning on the date of their establishment, unless, in the case of a council established by the President or an officer of the Federal Government, such council is renewed by appropriate action prior to the expiration of such 2-year period, or in the case of a council established by the Congress, its duration is otherwise provided for by law. See sections 1001(2) and 1013 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
§ 303.104 Acquisition of equipment and construction or alteration of facilities. ( a ) *General.* If the Secretary determines that a program authorized under part C of the Act will be improved by permitting program funds to be used to acquire appropriate equipment or to construct new facilities or alter existing facilities, the Secretary may allow the use of those funds for those purposes.
( b ) *Compliance with certain regulations.* Any construction of new facilities or alteration of existing facilities under paragraph (a) of this section must comply with the requirements of— ( 1 ) Appendix A of part 36 of title 28, Code of Federal Regulations (commonly known as the “Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities”); or
( 2 ) Appendix A of subpart 101-19.6 of title 41, Code of Federal Regulations (commonly known as the “Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards”).
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1404)
**Exhibit 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Compass Knowledge Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2002 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rogers W. Kirven, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

|                                                                                                                       |   |               |        |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------|--------|
| /s/ Rogers W. Kirven, Jr.                                                                                             |   |     |   |
|   Rogers W. Kirven, JrChief Executive OfficerChief Financial OfficerAugust 14, 2002     |
§ 33.32 Location of hearing. ( a ) The hearing may be held: ( 1 ) In any judicial district of the United States in which the defendant resides or transacts business;
( 2 ) In any judicial district of the United States in which the claim or statement in issue was made; or
( 3 ) In such other place as may be agreed upon by the defendant and the ALJ.
( b ) Each party must have the opportunity to present argument with respect to the location of the hearing.
( c ) The hearing must be held at the place and at the time ordered by the ALJ.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3803(g)(4))
Malta U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Field Office Bureau of Land Management 

Missoula 

Field Office 

Lewistown 

Field Office 

Miles City 

Butte Field Office 

Field 

Office Billings 

Field Office 

Dillon 

Field Office Butte Field Office 

Miles Draft RMP/EIS 

0 400 

Map 21: Boulder/Jefferson City 

Travel Plan Route Designations 

Under Alternative D 

BLM Routes 

Open Yearlong Bureau of Land Managment (BLM) 

Closed Yearlong Bureau of Reclamation 

Decommission 

County / City Government 

BLM Routes with Restrictions 

Private 

Closed 12/2 to 5/15 

State Lands 

Other Routes 

Other Federal Lands 

Public Access Route 

US Forest Service (USFS) 

Non-BLM Route 

Water 

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land 

Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data for individual 

or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. This map may 

not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed through 

digital means and information may be updated without notification. 

Boulder 

State Highway 

US Highway 

Interstate 

County Boundary 

Field Office / TPA Boundary 

Miles Railroad 

04 

Map Scale 1:50,000	 Map shows proposed road management within the Boulder/Jefferson CityTravel Planning Area under 

Alternative D. Under this alternative 5.3 miles of road would be Open yearlong, 32.8 miles of road Map generated by the Butte Field Office in February 2007 would be Open with a seasonal closure from December 2 to May 15, 20.6 miles of road would be 

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection Closed yearlong, and 2.7 miles of road would be Decommissioned.
§ 607.23 What special funding consideration does the Secretary provide? ( a ) If funds are available to fund only one additional planning grant and each of the next fundable applications has received the same number of points under § 607.20 or 607.21, the Secretary awards additional points, as provided in the application package or in a notice published in the Federal Register, to any of those applicants that— ( 1 ) Has an endowment fund of which the current market value, per full-time equivalent enrolled student, is less than the average current market value of the endowment funds, per full-time equivalent enrolled student, at similar type institutions; or
( 2 ) Has expenditures for library materials per full-time equivalent enrolled student which is less than the average expenditure for library materials per full-time equivalent enrolled student at similar type institutions.
( b ) If funds are available to fund only one additional development grant and each of the next fundable applications has received the same number of points under § 607.20 or 607.22, the Secretary awards additional points, as provided in the application package or in a notice published in the Federal Register, to any of those applicants that— ( 1 ) Has an endowment fund of which the current market value, per full-time equivalent enrolled student, is less than the average current market value of the endowment funds, per full-time equivalent enrolled student, at comparable institutions that offer similar instruction;
( 2 ) Has expenditures for library materials per full-time equivalent enrolled student which are less than the average expenditures for library materials per full-time equivalent enrolled student at comparable institutions that offer similar instruction; or
( 3 ) Propose to carry out one or more of the following activities— ( i ) Faculty development;
( ii ) Funds and administrative management;
( iii ) Development and improvement of academic programs;
( iv ) Acquisition of equipment for use in strengthening management and academic programs;
( v ) Joint use of facilities; and
( vi ) Student services.
( c ) As used in this section, an endowment fund does not include any fund established or supported under 34 CFR part 628.
( d ) Each year, the Secretary provides prospective applicants with the average expenditure of endowment funds and library materials per full-time equivalent student.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1057 *et seq.*)
[52 FR 30529, Aug. 14, 1987, as amended at 59 FR 41925, Aug. 15, 1994; 60 FR 15447, Mar. 23, 1995; 64 FR 70155, Dec. 15, 1999; 70 FR 13374, Mar. 21, 2005]
### §1331. Administrator; Office of the Administrator

In this chapter, the "Administrator" is the Register of Copyrights, and the "Office of the Administrator" and the "Office" refer to the Copyright Office of the Library of Congress.

(Added Pub. L. 105–304, title V, §502, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2916.)
§ 12.7 How is surplus Federal real property disposed of when there is more than one applicant? ( a ) If there is more than one applicant for the same surplus Federal real property, the Secretary transfers or leases the property to the applicant whose proposed program and plan of use the Secretary determines provides the greatest public benefit, using the criteria contained in appendix A to this part that broadly address the weight given to each type of entity applying and its proposed program and plan of use. (See example in § 12.10(d)).
( b ) If, after applying the criteria described in paragraph (a) of this section, two or more applicants are rated equally, the Secretary transfers or leases the property to one of the applicants after— ( 1 ) Determining the need for each applicant's proposed educational use at the site of the surplus Federal real property;
( 2 ) Considering the quality of each applicant's proposed program and plan of use; and
( 3 ) Considering each applicant's ability to carry out its proposed program and plan of use.
( c ) If the Secretary determines that the surplus Federal real property is capable of serving more than one applicant, the Secretary may apportion it to fit the needs of as many applicants as is practicable.
( d ) ( 1 ) The Secretary generally transfers surplus Federal real property to a selected applicant that meets the requirements of this part.
( 2 ) Alternatively, the Secretary may lease surplus Federal real property to a selected applicant that meets the requirements of this part if the Secretary determines that a lease will promote the most effective use of the property consistent with the purposes of this part or if having a lease is otherwise in the best interest of the United States, as determined by the Secretary.
(Authority: 40 U.S.C. 484(k))
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1114 

KA 11-01951 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

DAVID H. WILLIAMS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

LEANNE LAPP, PUBLIC DEFENDER, CANANDAIGUA, THE ABBATOY LAW FIRM, PLLC,

ROCHESTER (DAVID M. ABBATOY, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

R. MICHAEL TANTILLO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (BRIAN D. DENNIS

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (Thomas M. Van

Strydonck, J.), rendered July 27, 2011. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a

controlled substance in the third degree, criminally using drug

paraphernalia in the second degree (two counts) and unlawful

possession of marihuana. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Entered: November 8, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Case 17-31129-KLP Doc 6 Filed 03/08/17 Entered 03/08/17 12:26:45 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1