14918 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2011 / Notices 

1These 87 companies are: Angang Clothes Rack 

Manufacture Company Limited; Bazhou Sanqiang 

Furniture Co., Ltd.; Bestallied International Corp.; 

Bestluck Enterprise Limited; Blue Mountain Imp 

Exp Co Ltd.; Bon Voyage Logistics Inc.; Butler 

Courtesy (Guilin) Inc.; C Import And Export 

(HongKong) Co., Ltd.; Century Distribution System 

(Shenzhen) Ltd.; Changzhou Fortune Handicraft 

Co., Ltd.; Changzhou MC Imp. & Exp. Co. Ltd. a/ 

k/a Changzhou MC I E Co., Ltd.; China Fujian 

Minhou Shenghua Handicrafts Co., Ltd.; China 

Ningbo Wahfay Industrial (Group) Co., Ltd.; CTN 

Limited Company; CTO International Co. Ltd.; 

Eagle Brand Holdings Limited Ecocom Crafts Co., 

Ltd. a/k/a/Hangzhou Ecocom Crafts Co., Ltd.; Eisho 

Co., Ltd. a/k/a Eisho Hanger Co., Ltd.; Fujian 

Pucheng Breeze Home Products, Inc.; Good Wonder 

Ltd.; Guangdong Machinery Imp. & Exp. Co.; 

Guangdong Provincial Taoyue Manufacturing Co., 

Ltd.; Guangxi Yikai Industry and Trade Co., Ltd. ; 

Guangzhou Haojin Motorcycle Company; 

Guangzhou Zhuocheng Plastic Co., Ltd.; Guilin 

Betterall Household Articles Co., Ltd.; Guilin 

Harvest Co., Ltd.; Guilin Jinlai Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.; 

Guilin Yusense Home Collection Co., Ltd.; Haimen 

Jinhang Business Trading Co.; Haiyan Lianxiang 

Hardware Products Co.; Hangzhou Dunli Import & 

Export Co.; Hanji Metals and Plastics Crafts Co.; Hd 

Supply Shenzhen; Hezhou City Yaolong Trade Co 

Ltd.; Jiahe International Trading Co.; Jiangmen 

Masters Hardware Products; Jiangsu Y and S Inc.; 

Jiangyin Hongji Metal Products Co., Ltd.; K.O.D 

Solutions Limited Dongguan Office; Kingtex Imp & 

Exp Co., Ltd.; Laidlaw Company LLC; Mainfreight 

Int’l Logistics (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.; Maxplus 

Industries Co., Ltd.; Nanjing Feisike Import & 

Export Trading Co. Ltd.; Ningbo Beilun Huafa Metal 

Products; Ningbo Everun International Limited; 

Ningbo First Rank International Co.; Ningbo Homedollar Imp. & Exp. Corp.; Ningbo Hongdi Measuring 

Tape Co., Ltd.; Ningbo Municipal Xinyu Imp. & 

Exp. Co.; Ningbo Wellway Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.; 

Overseas Int’l Group Corp.; Plastic Intercon Co., 

Ltd.; Quyky Yanglei International Co., Ltd., a/k/a/ 

Quyky Group; Shandong Autjinrong Foundassemble Co., Ltd.; Shanghai Cheertie Display 

Fixture; Shanghai Electric Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.; 

Shanghai Hua Yue Packaging Products; Shanghai 

International Trade Transportation Co., Ltd.; 

Shanghai International Trade Yee Da Imp. & Ex. Co. 

Ltd.; Shanghai New Union Textra Import & Export 

Co., Ltd.; Shanghai Overseas Enterprises Co.Ltd.; 

Shanghai Textile Raw Materials; Shanghai Wintex 

Import & Export Co., Ltd.; Shaoxing Amazon Prime 

Trade Co., Ltd.; Shaoxing Dingli Metal Clotheshorse 

Co., Ltd.; Shaoxing Kinglaw Metal Products Co., 

Ltd.; Shenzhen He Zhenglong Imp. & Exp. Co. Ltd., 

a/k/a Shenzhen He Zhong Long Imxp; Shenzhen 

SED Industry Co., Ltd. a/k/a/Shenzhen Sed 

Electronics Co.; Sunny Metal Inc.; Taishan Jinji 

Hangers Co., Ltd.; Taizhou Huasheng Wooden Co., 

Ltd.; Tianjin Tailai Imp & Exp Co., Ltd.; Transtek 

Automotive Products Co. Ltd.; Tri-star Trading Co.; 

Uasha Group International Shanghai Ltd.; Universal 

Houseware (Dongguan); Wenzhou N.& A. foreign 

Trade Corp.; Wenzhou Pan Pacific Foreign Trade 

Co., Ltd.; Wesken International (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.; 

World Trading Service Limited; X&Y Papa-fix 

Industry Limited; Zhangjiagang Maohua Coating & 

Adorn Zhejiang Arts and Crafts Import; Zhejiang 

Huamao International Co., Ltd.; and Zhejiang 

Wenzhou Packaging Imp. & Exp. 

cases involving imports from a NAFTA 

country with review by independent 

binational panels. When a Request for 

Panel Review is filed, a panel is 

established to act in place of national 

courts to review expeditiously the final 

determination to determine whether it 

conforms with the antidumping or 

countervailing duty law of the country 

that made the determination. 

Under Article 1904 of the Agreement, 

which came into force on January 1, 

1994, the Government of the United 

States, the Government of Canada and 

the Government of Mexico established 

Rules of Procedure for Article 1904 

Binational Panel Reviews (‘‘Rules’’). 

These Rules were published in the 

Federal Register on February 23, 1994 

(59 FR 8686). The panel review in this 

matter has been conducted in 

accordance with these Rules. 

Panel Decision: The panel affirmed 

the International Trade Commission’s 

determination on remand respecting 

Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube 

from Mexico: Final Determination of 

Material Injury to a U.S. Industry. 

Dated: March 14, 2011. 

Valarie Dees, 

U.S. Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6311 Filed 3–17–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–918] 

Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the 

People’s Republic of China: Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 18, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert Palmer, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 9, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington DC 20230; (202) 482–6905. 

Background 

On November 29, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published in the Federal 

Register a notice of initiation of an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on steel wire 

garment hangers from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) covering the 

period October 1, 2009, through 

September 30, 2010. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews 75 FR 73036 

(November 29, 2010) (‘‘Initiation 

Notice’’). On December 23, 2010, the 

M&B Metal Products Inc. (‘‘Petitioner’’) 

withdrew its request for an 

administrative review of 87 1 companies 

out of the 102 companies upon which 

we initiated the administrative review. 

Petitioner was the only party to request 

a review of these 87 companies. 

Partial Rescission 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Secretary will rescind an administrative 

review, in whole or in part, if a party 

who requested the review withdraws 

the request within 90 days of the date 

of publication of notice of initiation of 

the requested review. Petitioner’s 

request was submitted within the 90 day 

period and, thus, is timely. Because 

Petitioner’s withdrawal of its request for 

review is timely and because no other 

party requested a review of the 

aforementioned companies, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

we are partially rescinding this review 

with respect to the 87 companies listed 

above. 

Assessment Rates 

The Department will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

to assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. For those 

companies for which this review has 

been rescinded and which have a 

separate rate, antidumping duties shall 

be assessed at rates equal to the cash 

deposit of estimated antidumping duties 

required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(2). The Department 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions directly to CBP 15 days 

after publication of this notice for those 

companies with a separate rate. 

For the above companies that are part 

of the PRC-wide entity, the Department 

cannot order liquidation at this time 

because although they are no longer 

under review as a separate entity, they 

may still be under review as part of the 

PRC-wide entity. Therefore, the 

Department cannot order liquidation 

instructions at this time because their 

respective entries may be under review 

in the ongoing administrative review. 

The Department intends to issue 

assessment instructions for the PRCwide entity, 15 days after publication of 

the final results of the ongoing 

administrative review. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers for whom this review is 

being rescinded, as of the publication 

date of this notice, of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2011 / Notices 14919 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of the antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return/destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: March 14, 2011. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6455 Filed 3–17–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–912] 

Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road 

Tires From the People’s Republic of 

China: Notice of Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 18, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Raquel Silva or Frances Veith, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 8, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–6475 or (202) 482– 

4295, respectively. 

Background 

On September 1, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) published a notice of 

opportunity to request an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on certain new pneumatic off-the-road 

tires (‘‘OTR tires’’) from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) for the period 

of review (‘‘POR’’) September 1, 2009, 

through August 31, 2010. See 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity to Request 

Administrative Review, 75 FR 53635 

(September 1, 2010). On September 17, 

2010, Mai Shandong Radial Tyre Co., 

Ltd. (‘‘Mai Shandong’’) an exporter of 

subject merchandise, requested that the 

Department conduct an administrative 

review of its exports to the United States 

during the POR. On September 27, 2010, 

Qingdao Free Trade Zone Full World 

International Trading Co., Ltd. (‘‘Full 

World’’), an exporter of subject 

merchandise, also requested a review of 

its own exports. On September 30, 2010, 

Bridgestone Americas, Inc. and 

Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, 

LLC (collectively ‘‘Bridgestone’’), a 

domestic interested party to the 

proceeding, requested that the 

Department conduct an administrative 

review of OTR tire exports from the 

following entities: (1) Hangzhou 

Zhongce Rubber Co., Ltd. (‘‘Hangzhou 

Zhongce’’), (2) Hebei Starbright Tire Co., 

Ltd. (‘‘Starbright’’), (3) KS Holding 

Limited/KS Resources Limited (‘‘KS 

Holding’’), (4) Laizhou Xiongying 

Rubber Industry Co., Ltd. (‘‘Laizhou 

Xiongying’’), (5) Qingdao Taifa Group 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Qingdao Taifa’’), (6) Tianjin 

United Tire & Rubber International Co., 

Ltd. (‘‘TUTRIC’’), and (7) Weihai 

Zhongwei Rubber Co., Ltd. (‘‘Weihai 

Zhongwei’’). On September 30, 2011, 

Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd., Guizhou 

Advance Rubber Co., Ltd. and Guizhou 

Tyre Import and Export Corporation 

(collectively, ‘‘GTC’’) requested an 

administrative review of its own OTR 

tire exports. The Department then 

published in the Federal Register the 

initiation notice for the antidumping 

duty administrative review of OTR tires 

from the PRC for the 2009–2010 POR. 

See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews, 75 FR 66349 (October 28, 

2010). 

Partial Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Secretary will rescind an administrative 

review, in whole or in part, if the party 

that requested the review withdraws the 

request within 90 days of the date of 

publication of the notice of initiation of 

the requested review. The Secretary may 

also extend this time limit if the 

Secretary decides that it is reasonable to 

do so. On November 15, 2010, GTC 

timely withdrew its request for a review 

of its exports. On January 24, 2011, Full 

World timely withdrew its request for a 

review of its exports. On January 26, 

2011, Bridgestone timely withdrew its 

request for review of Starbright, 

Hangzhou Zhongce, KS Holding, 

Laizhou Xiongying, and Qingdao Taifa. 

On February 17, 2011, Mai Shandong 

withdrew its request for a review of its 

exports. Although the deadline to 

withdraw requests for review was 

January 26, 2011, the Department notes 

that this administrative review remains 

in its early stages, and significant 

resources have not yet been expended 

on this review as a whole. Therefore, the 

Department is accepting Mai 

Shandong’s withdrawal. 

Because no additional party requested 

a review of GTC, Starbright, Hangzhou 

Zhongce, KS Holding, Laizhou 

Xiongying, Qingdao Taifa, Full World, 

and Mai Shandong, the Department 

hereby rescinds the administrative 

review of OTR tires with respect to 

these entities in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(1). This administrative 

review will continue with respect to 

TUTRIC and Weihai Zhongwei because 

requests for review of these companies 

remain. 

Assessment Rates 

The Department will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

to assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. For GTC, Starbright, 

KS Holding, Laizhou Xiongying, and 

Full World, which each had previously 

established eligibility for a separate rate, 

antidumping duties shall be assessed at 

rates equal to the cash deposit of 

estimated antidumping duties required 

at the time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse, for consumption, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(2). 

The Department intends to issue 

appropriate assessment instructions 

directly to CBP 15 days after publication 

of this notice. 

Because Hangzhou Zhongce, Qingdao 

Taifa, and Mai Shandong remain part of 

the PRC entity, their respective entries 

may be under review in the ongoing 

administrative review. Accordingly, the 

Department will not order liquidation of 

entries for Hangzhou Zhongce, Qingdao 

Taifa, or Mai Shandong. The 

Department intends to issue assessment 

instructions for the PRC entity, which 

will cover any entries by Hangzhou 

Zhongce, Qingdao Taifa, and Mai 

Shandong, 15 days after publication of 

the final results of the ongoing 

administrative review. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under section 351.402(f) of the 

Department’s regulations to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES