alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Waa’ee dufkakaa ijooleeti Himuu

Daa’immi kee dufkakaa fluu ofirraa ittisuufi nama biraat akka hin tamsaasine/

dabarsine maal gochu akka danda’u irrati hubanoo godhi:

Daa’immi kee talaallii dufkakaa fluu 

akka argatu godhi. Marfeen talaalliif 

waranan ni dhukubsa ta’a, yaa ta’u 

malee akka booda hin dhukkubsane 

gargaara. Talaalliin dufkakaa fluu 

kan funyaanin kenamus ni jira. 

Yeroo dhukkubsatan akka waraqaa 

sooftii irratti qufa’an yookin anxifatan 

jajjabeesi. Warqaa sooftii sans akka 

bakka qushaashaatti gati. Yoo waraqaa 

sooftii hin qabaane afaanifi funyaan 

isaani hirreen qadaadachuutu irra jira. 

Namoota dhukkubsatan 

irraa fagaachuu akka 

yaalan jajjabeesi.

Harka isaanii saabbunaafi bishaan 

ho’aan sakandii 15-20 akka dhiqatan 

jajjabeesi. Akka fakkeeynaati ofiif 

dhiqachuun itti agarsiis. 

Yoo dhukkubsatan hanga itti wayaa’uti 

hojii fi barnoota irraa hafanii, nama irraa 

fagaatani mana akka taa’an jajjabeesi. 

CS 217339/2010 1

INFILUWEENZAA (Dufkaka fluu) Daa’immi kee dufkakaan yoo qabame

Dipaartmantii Tajaajilota Sabaa Fayyaa kan U.S. 

Wiirtuu To’annaa Ittisa Dhukkuubaa
2

Dipaartmantii Tajaajilota Sabaafi Fayyaa kan U.S. 

Wiirtuu To’annaafi Ittisa Dhukkuubaa

INFILUWEENZAA (Dufkaka fluu) Daa’immi kee dufkakaan yoo qabame

Odeefannoo dabalataaf odeefannoo CDC lakkoofsa kanaan waami 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636) yookin 

websaayiti kana ilaali www.cdc.gov/flu.

Amala fayyaa/gaarii akka qabaatan, nyaata fayyaa/gaarii akka nyaatan, hirriiba gahaa ta’e akka rafan, ispoortii akka 

hojjatan jajjabeesi. 

Dufkakaa fluu irraa akkamitti akka of eeganifi dufkakaa fluu jarmii biraa 

nama biraati akka hindabarsine maal gochuu akka isaanirra jiru gaafii isaani 

akka carraati fayyadamiiti itti himi.
### §825s–8. Southeastern Power Administration: rates of basic and premium pay

During fiscal year 2020 and each fiscal year thereafter, notwithstanding any provision of title 5 relating to classification or rates of pay, the Southeastern Power Administration shall pay any power system dispatcher employed by the Administration a rate of basic pay and premium pay based on those prevailing for similar occupations in the electric power industry. Basic pay and premium pay may not be paid under this section to any individual during a calendar year so as to result in a total rate in excess of the rate of basic pay for level V of the Executive Schedule (section 5316 of such title).

(Pub. L. 116–94, div. C, title III, §310, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2681.)
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

**Certificationof Principal Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18U.S.C. 1350**

**(Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

I, Stuart R. Lloyd, Chief Financial Officer(principal financial officer) of PEC Solutions, Inc. (the “Registrant”),certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon review of the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 of theRegistrant (the “Report”):

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.

 
| /s/  STUART R. LLOYD |            |
|---------------------------|-----------------|
| Name:                     | Stuart R. Lloyd |
| Date:                     | May 10, 2004    |
|                           |                 |  |

 

----
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4987 

To provide first responders with planning, training, and equipment capabilities 

for crude oil-by-rail and ethanol-by-rail derailment and incident response, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2019 

Ms. HERRERA BEUTLER (for herself and Mr. HIGGINS of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, 

Space, and Technology 

A BILL 

To provide first responders with planning, training, and 

equipment capabilities for crude oil-by-rail and ethanolby-rail derailment and incident response, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fire Department Prop5 er Response and Equipment Prioritization Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4987 IH

1 SEC. 2. SUPPORT FOR FIREFIGHTERS FOR CRUDE OIL-BY2 RAIL AND ETHANOL-BY-RAIL DERAILMENT 

3 AND INCIDENT RESPONSE. 

4 Section 33(c) of the Federal Fire Prevention and 

5 Control Act of 1974 (15 U.S.C. 2229(c)) is amended by 

6 adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(4) PRIORITY.—The Administrator of FEMA 

8 shall, in carrying out this section, give high priority 

9 consideration to grants providing for planning, train10 ing, and equipment to firefighters for crude oil-by11 rail and ethanol-by-rail derailment and incident re12 sponse.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
- page 1 scanned
- page 2
---

Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of the Company

|Name of
      Subsidiary               |  | Jurisdiction of Organization |  |  | % Owned | 
|-------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  |  | ------- | 
|Charleston Industrial Co. Limited      |  | BVI                          |  |  | 100%    | 
|Tianjin
      Yayi Industrial Co. Ltd. |  | PRC                          |  |  | 100%    | 
|Shaanxi Milkgoat Dairy Co., Ltd.       |  | PRC                          |  |  | 100%    | 
|Fuping
      Milkgoat Dairy Co., Ltd.  |  | PRC                          |  |  | 100%    | 
|Weinan Milkgoat Production Co., Ltd.   |  | PRC                          |  |  | 100%    | 



---
#### In the Matter of Carl L. Thiele, an Attorney.

Charges against an attorney of professional misconduct.

Per Curiam:

This controversy seems to be principally a dispute between two attorneys at law who have dissolved partnership. It appears by the answer of the respondent that he has commenced an action against his former partner for an accounting and he claims that on that accounting a balance will be found due him. I am inclined to think that these proceedings should be suspended so as to give the respondent a reasonable time to bring on his action against his partner and thus have the dispute tried out in that action rather than in these proceedings. If the respondent fails to bring on that action for hearing within a reasonable time, or after the decision of the court in that action, the petitioner may move to continue these proceedings. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5071 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5071

To provide access to Federal public benefits for aliens, without regard 
    to the immigration status of that alien, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 2019

  Ms. Ocasio-Cortez (for herself, Ms. Meng, Ms. Garcia of Texas, Ms. 
 Tlaib, Mr. Garcia of Illinois, and Ms. Lee of California) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
                               and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide access to Federal public benefits for aliens, without regard 
    to the immigration status of that alien, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``A Just Society: The Embrace Act''.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL PUBLIC BENEFIT ACCESSIBILITY FOR ALIENS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law 
(including title IV of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity 
Reconciliation Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.)), an individual who 
is an alien (without regard to the immigration status of that alien) 
may not be denied any Federal public benefit solely on the basis of the 
individual's immigration status.
    (b) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term ``Federal 
public benefit'' means--
            (1) any grant, contract, loan, professional license, or 
        commercial license provided by an agency of the United States 
        or by appropriated funds of the United States; and
            (2) any retirement, welfare, health, disability, public or 
        assisted housing, postsecondary education, food assistance, 
        unemployment benefit, or any other similar benefit for which 
        payments or assistance are provided to an individual, 
        household, or family eligibility unit by an agency of the 
        United States or by appropriated funds of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
### §3049. Warrant for removal

Only one writ or warrant is necessary to remove a prisoner from one district to another. One copy thereof may be delivered to the sheriff or jailer from whose custody the prisoner is taken, and another to the sheriff or jailer to whose custody he is committed, and the original writ, with the marshal's return thereon, shall be returned to the clerk of the district to which he is removed.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 817.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §604 (R.S. §1029).
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,578

EX PARTE RENE LONGORIA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2008-419,544 IN THE 364 DISTRICT COURT

TH

FROM LUBBOCK COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,

the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus.

Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of

aggravated robbery and sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment. The Seventh Court of

Appeals affirmed his conviction. Longoria v. State, No. 07-09-00196-CR (Tex.

App.–Amarillo Feb. 25, 2010, pet. ref’d)(not designated for publication).

Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to
2

object to the use of a state jail felony to enhance the punishment range in this first degree

felony cause.

The trial court has determined that trial counsel was ineffective in that counsel failed

to properly object to the use of a state jail felony as an enhancement and that such ineffective

representation prejudiced Applicant. We agree. We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled

to a new punishment hearing in the judgment of conviction in Case No. 2008-419,544 from

the 364 Judicial District Court of Lubbock County. Applicant is remanded to the custody

th

of the Sheriff of Lubbock County so the trial court may conduct a new punishment hearing.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal

Justice–Correctional Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: June 15, 2011

Do Not Publish
#### § 390.40 What are the matching requirements?

A grantee must contribute to the cost of a project under this program in an amount satisfactory to the Secretary. The part of the costs to be borne by the grantee is determined by the Secretary at the time of the award.

(Authority: Section 12(c) and 302 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 772)
EX-32                                        SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FreeStar Technology
Corporation ("Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission ("Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his
knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.


Dated: December 1, 2003                By: /s/  Paul Egan
                                       Paul Egan, President


Dated: December 1, 2003                By: /s/  Ciaran Egan
                                       Ciaran Egan, Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 7,757

 9,330

 9,612

 8,937

 8,688

 9,340

 8,952

 8,651

 8,800

 7,052

 7,357

 6,867

 6,001

 0

 13,868

 15,338

 16,641

 16,657

 19,569

 15,740

 13,417

 12,899

 11,753

 11,502

 10,430

 11,963

 11,793

 11,811

 11,971

 11,131

 10,813

 2,887

 2,780

 3,159

 3,412

 1,921

 2,529

 2,043

 1,997

 2,442

 2,385

 2,826

 2,161

 3,012

 0

 2,102

 5,690

 5,107

 5,480

 4,601

 4,722

 4,730

 4,255

 3,382

 3,708

 4,050

 4,643

 4,415

 4,061

 3,372

 2,355

 2,190

 5,344

 5,214

 6,031

 5,738

 4,757

 5,986

 5,060

 4,615

 4,885

 5,014

 4,694

 4,264

 4,583

 0

 9,835

 9,779

 9,519

 9,899

 10,589

 9,687

 8,151

 7,398

 6,938

 7,048

 7,142

 7,563

 7,458

 7,052

 6,495

 6,034

 6,136

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 4, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The inventions listed below are assigned to the United States Government as represented by the Secretary of the Army. The U.S. Army Edgewood Chemical Biological Center intends to license these inventions exclusively to Guild Associates, Inc., an Ohio Corporation with principal offices 5750 Shier-Rings Road Dublin, OH 43016. The inventions to be licensed are known as “Filtration Media and process for the Removal of Hazardous Material from Air Streams,” and “Zirconium Hydroxide for Decontaminating Toxic Agents.” The U.S. Patent Application serial numbers for these inventions are 12/914,334 filed on October 28, 2010 and 12/917,811 filed on November 2, 2010, respectively.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Requests for more information and/or objections should be directed to Eric McGill telephone: 410-436-8467,                         *eric.s.mcgill@us.army.mil*, U.S. Army Edgewood Chemical Biological Center (ECBC), AMSRD-ECB-PI-BP-TT, Bldg E3330/Rm 241 5183 Blackhawk Road, APG, MD 21010-5424. Any requests of objections should be made within 15 days of the publication of this notice.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Dhirajlal Parekh, Office of Research and Technology Applications, U.S. Army Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, AMSRD-ECB-PI-BP-TT, Bldg E3330/Rm 241 5183 Blackhawk Road, APG, MD 21010-5424, telephone: 410-436-8400, e-mail:                         *dhirajlal.parekh@us.army.mil*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2011-7618 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
Response to 2nd part of F-5:

Clarify that the analysis of disease transmission is not based on the work of the RADT or Payette 

Principles Committees, but rather the SNF’s own reworking and analysis of the data.

The analysis of disease transmission conducted for the Forest Plan DEIS and FEIS is in no way connected

to the RADT Committee or the Payette Principles Committee. Biologists relied on the science developed 

for and displayed in the Risk Analysis of Disease Transmission between Domestic Sheep and Goats and 

Rocky Mountain Bighorn Sheep, Shoshone National Forest 2013. Pertinent information was extracted 

from the Payette’s risk assessment (USDA Forest Service 2006a) and brought forward into the SNF’s risk 

assessment (Risk Analysis of Disease Transmission between Domestic Sheep and Goats and Rocky 

Mountain Bighorn Sheep, Shoshone National Forest 2013, page 3.) Findings and conclusions in the 

SNF’s risk assessment are based on data specific to the SNF’s bighorn sheep populations and their 

habitat.
§ 225.10 How does the Secretary evaluate an application? ( a ) The Secretary evaluates an application on the basis of the criteria in § 225.11.
( b ) The Secretary awards up to 100 points for these criteria.
( c ) The maximum possible score for each criterion is indicated in parentheses.
[70 FR 15003, Mar. 24, 2005, as amended at 84 FR 25998, June 5, 2019]
### §1865. National Park Service

(a) Violation of Regulations Relating to Use and Management of National Park System Units.—A person that violates any regulation authorized by section 100751(a) of title 54 shall be imprisoned not more than 6 months, fined under this title, or both, and be adjudged to pay all cost of the proceedings.

(b) Financial Disclosure by Officers or Employees Performing Functions or Duties Under Subchapter III of Chapter 1007 of Title 54.—An officer or employee of the Department of the Interior who is subject to, and knowingly violates, section 100737 of title 54 or any regulation prescribed under that section shall be imprisoned not more than one year, fined under this title, or both.

(c) Offenses Relating to Structures and Vegetation.—A person that willfully destroys, mutilates, defaces, injures, or removes any monument, statue, marker, guidepost, or other structure, or that willfully destroys, cuts, breaks, injures, or removes any tree, shrub, or plant within a national military park shall be imprisoned not less than 15 days nor more than one year, fined under this title but not less than $10 for each monument, statue, marker, guidepost, or other structure, tree, shrub, or plant that is destroyed, defaced, injured, cut, or removed, or both.

(d) Trespassing in a National Military Park To Hunt or Shoot.—An individual who trespasses in a national military park to hunt or shoot, or hunts game of any kind in a national military park with a gun or dog, or sets a trap or net or other device in a national military park to hunt or catch game of any kind, shall be imprisoned not less than 5 nor more than 30 days, fined under this title, or both.

(Added Pub. L. 113–287, §4(a)(1), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3260.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1865(a) | 16 U.S.C. 3 (1st sentence words after "National Park Service") | Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, §3 (1st sentence words after "National Park Service"), 39 Stat. 535; June 2, 1920, ch. 218, §5 (last sentence words after "for other purposes' " and before proviso), 41 Stat. 732. |
| 1865(b) | 16 U.S.C. 1912(d) | Pub. L. 94–429, §13(d), Sept. 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 1345. |
| 1865(c) | 16 U.S.C. 413 | Mar. 3, 1897, ch. 372, §§1, 2, 5, 29 Stat. 621, 622. |
| 1865(d) | 16 U.S.C. 414. | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "fined under this title" are substituted for "punished by a fine of not more than $500" for consistency with chapter 227.

In subsection (b), the words "fined under this title" are substituted for "fined not more than $2,500" for consistency with chapter 227.

In subsection (c), the words "fined under this title but not less than $10" are substituted for "deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not less than $10 nor more than $1,000" for consistency with chapter 227.

In subsection (d), the words "fined under this title" are substituted for "guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000" for consistency with chapter 227.
#### May Gassman, Defendant in Error, v. Edward Gassman, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 15,180.

Municipal *Coubt—when judgment affirmed.*A finding of the trial court where supported by the preponderance of the evidence, will he affirmed on appeal.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John H. Hume, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1909.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 24, 1911.

B. M. Shaffner, for plaintiff in error.

John F. Haas, for defendant in error.

Mr. Presiding Justice Mack

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff sued her father for $303.50 loaned to him. He claimed that it was his own money. In addition he claims by way of set-off for board and lodging furnished the plaintiff.

No controverted questions of law are presented by this record. We agree with the conclusions of the trial judge, to whom the cause was submitted without a jury, that a preponderance of the evidence sustains plaintiff’s claim and fails to sustain defendant’s set-off.

*Affirmed.*
### §2384. Seditious conspiracy

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, §1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §6 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §6, 35 Stat. 1089).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $20,000".

1956—Act July 24, 1956, substituted "$20,000" for "$5,000", and "twenty years" for "six years".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1956 Amendment

Act July 24, 1956, ch. 678, §3, 70 Stat. 624, provided that: "The foregoing amendments [amending this section and section 2385 of this title] shall apply only with respect to offenses committed on and after the date of the enactment of this Act [July 24, 1956]."