alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Letters (1-50) received in support of the Sky West proposal for DOT-OST-2009-0300 Alpena, Ml Air 

Service 

For complete letter/communications contact Jackie Krawczak at the Alpena Area Chamber of 

Commerce. 989.354.4181. 

Business Name Signed By 

1. World Wide Travel Wendy Lacombe 

2. The Alpena News 

Bill Speer 

Max Friz 

3. property owner 

4. Thunder Bay Area Credit Union Peggy Stanton 

5. Alpena Regional Medical Center Development Council Ann Diamond 

6. North Country Candy and Gifts Susanne Evans 

7. Young's Appliance Company Bob Young 

8. First Federal of Northern Michigan Mike Mahler 

9. citizen 

Karsten Boerger 

10. Century 21 Crow Realty 

Paul Momrik 

11. Alpena Events Complex 

Darlene Wilmot 

12. NEMCMH 

Amber Gunderman 

13. Timm Construction 

Dennis Schultz 

14. Alpena Power Company 

Ann Burton 

15. Alpena Community College Carolyn Daoust 

16. Midwest Transaction Group 

Patrick Heraghty 

17. Community Foundation for NE Michigan Barb Willyard 

18. Extendicare 

Cassandra Bruning 

19. Premium Hydro Solutions Dustin Prevost 

20. Financial Services by Design Nate Blury 

21. Charter Communications Ed Kavanaugh 
. ' 

22. United Way of NE Michigan 

23. Timm Construction 

24. Alpena Radiology 

25. First Federal of Northern Michigan 

26. WMCR Corporation 

27. Independent Bank 

28. Timm Construction 

29. Weinkauf Plumbing and Heating 

30. citizen 

31. River's Edge Golf Club 

32. Fiber Char 

33. Timm Construction 

34. Fiber Char 

35. Alpena Community Credit Union 

36. Sevan K. 

37. TerraCaloric 

38. Bank of Alpena 

39. Alpena Community College 

40.AAA 

41. Trelawny Resort 

42. Panel Processing 

43. Green Township 

44. Ameriprise Financial 

45. Jen Calery Photography 

46. Pace and Hong Auctions 

Germaine Stoppa 

Randy Boboltz 

Dr. Zweig 

Linda Sansom 

Doug Horne, CFO 

Gary Dawley 

Pat Schultz 

Rob Weinkauf 

Carlene Aliferis 

Eric Granata 

Mike Bagnieschi 

Matt Gagnon 

Jeff Sheppler 

Mary Nefske 

Wayne Kowalski 

Ben Westrope 

Craig Kus 

Dr. Olin Joynton 

Maureen Knack 

Steve and Carrie Davies 

Eric Smith 

Eric Smith 

Kip Burke 

Jen Calery 

Herman Pace 
.. .;; 

47. Alpena Lions Club/Friends of the Library 

48. Goodrich Paving 

49. Regional Elite 

50. Alpena Agency 

Kenneth Dully 

Bruce Goodrich 

Roger Dorr 

Pete Wilson
(No. 77-CC-0935

#### Mark Lewellen, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*227Order filed August 19, 1977.

Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas v. State, 32*Ill.Ct.Cl__, this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
---

Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors 
Yayi International Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-167651) of Yayi
International Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated June 29, 2010 (except
for Note 2, to which the date is June 28, 2011), which appears in this
transition report on Form 10-K/A for the five months ended March 31, 2010

/s/ Morison Cogen LLP

Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania 
June 28, 2011

---
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

In re:

Elizabeth Corey Hart 

Debtor

Case No. 19-10763-KHK

(Chapter 13)

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ENFORCE AUTOMATIC STAY

THIS CASE came before the court on April 3, 2019 on the Debtor’s Motion to Enforce 

Automatic Stay (Docket Entry No. 5). The Debtor failed to appear for the hearing.

WHEREAS, the Court takes judicial notice of the Debtor’s three previous filings since 

2015 wherein she resided at her current address 1991 Brook Farm Court, Woodbridge, Virginia 

22192:

1. Case No. 15-11992: A Chapter 7 petition filed on June 9, 2015 and the Debtor was

discharged on September 16, 2015; 

2. Case No. 16-11811: A Chapter 13 petition filed on May 24, 2016 and dismissed on 

August 25, 2016 for lack of good faith and;

3. Case No. 18-11983: A Chapter 13 petition filed on June 5, 2018 and voluntarily 

dismissed on August 30, 2018. In this case, the Debtor never filed schedules. 

UPON CONSIDERATION THEREOF, and for the reasons stated by the Court on the 

record, it is

ORDERED that the Debtor’s Motion to Enforce Automatic Stay is denied.

Date: ______________ 

Klinette H. Kindred

Alexandria, Virginia United States Bankruptcy Judge

Apr 3 2019 /s/ Klinette Kindred

Entered on Docket: Apr 4 2019

Case 19-10763-KHK Doc 25 Filed 04/04/19 Entered 04/04/19 13:29:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Copy electronically to:

Thomas P. Gorman

Copy mailed to:

Elizabeth Corey Hart 

1991 Brook Farm Court 

Woodbridge, VA 22192

Case 19-10763-KHK Doc 25 Filed 04/04/19 Entered 04/04/19 13:29:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 93375 / October 18, 2021

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20381

In the Matter of

Securities America Advisors, Inc.,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

On February 22, 2019, the Commission issued an Omnibus Order Directing the 

Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that Establish Distribution Funds 

(the “Omnibus Order”)1 authorizing the Secretary2to issue orders for calendar years 2019-2021 

appointing, upon request by the Commission staff, Miller Kaplan Arase LLP (“Miller Kaplan”), a 

certified public accounting firm, with one of their offices located in San Francisco, California, as 

tax administrator (“Tax Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund 

may incur tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department 

of the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

The Commission staff has requested pursuant to the Omnibus Order, the appointment of 

Miller Kaplan as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Miller Kaplan, pursuant to and in accordance with the 

Omnibus Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.3

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 85174 (Feb. 22, 2019).

2

 Effective December 29, 2020, the Director of the Division of Enforcement is now also authorized to make 

appointments in accordance with the Omnibus Order. See Delegation of Authority to Director of the Division of 

Enforcement, Securities Act Rel. No. 10900 (Dec. 10, 2020).

3

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(ii).
§ 104.8 Notice. ( a ) A recipient that employs fifteen or more persons shall take appropriate initial and continuing steps to notify participants, beneficiaries, applicants, and employees, including those with impaired vision or hearing, and unions or professional organizations holding collective bargaining or professional agreements with the recipient that it does not discriminate on the basis of handicap in violation of section 504 and this part. The notification shall state, where appropriate, that the recipient does not discriminate in admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its program or activity. The notification shall also include an identification of the responsible employee designated pursuant to § 104.7(a). A recipient shall make the initial notification required by this paragraph within 90 days of the effective date of this part. Methods of initial and continuing notification may include the posting of notices, publication in newspapers and magazines, placement of notices in recipients' publication, and distribution of memoranda or other written communications.
( b ) If a recipient publishes or uses recruitment materials or publications containing general information that it makes available to participants, beneficiaries, applicants, or employees, it shall include in those materials or publications a statement of the policy described in paragraph (a) of this section. A recipient may meet the requirement of this paragraph either by including appropriate inserts in existing materials and publications or by revising and reprinting the materials and publications.
[45 FR 30936, May 9, 1980, as amended at 65 FR 68054, Nov. 13, 2000]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 553

 553

 562

 582

 634

 657

 665

 657

 600

 622

 596

 611

 607

 611

 615

 620

 618

 638

 695

 674

 648

 641

 647

 650

 648

 669

 673

 649

 640

 661

 499

 480

 475

 484

 488

 483

 456

 477

 480

 491

 489

 547

 565

 503

 511

 531

 522

 508

 511

 511

 503

 513

 540

 547

 560

 599

 558

 553

 559

 580

 526

 530

 524

 529

 545

 576

 571

 560

 557

 569

 564

 586

 585

 559

 578

 580

 569

 579

 615

 608

 604

 603

 604

 616

 619

 630

 620

 616

 615

 624

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 9, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 341

 344

 340

 343

 353

 372

 369

 362

 360

 368

 365

 378

 378

 361

 373

 374

 368

 374

 396

 392

 389

 389

 389

 397

 399

 405

 399

 397

 396

 402

TOTAL 17,461

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Excelsior Venture Partners III, LLC (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2007 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                            
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | ---------------------------
|Date: September 14, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ David R. Bailin     
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | David R. Bailin            
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer 
|                         |  |  | 
|Date: September 14, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Raghav V. Nandagopal
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Raghav V. Nandagopal       
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer 
|                         |  |  | 
|Date: September 14, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Steven L. Suss      
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Steven L. Suss             
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Principal Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



29
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4748 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4748

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend increased dependency 
 and indemnity compensation paid to surviving spouses of veterans who 
  die from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, regardless of how long the 
               veterans had such disease prior to death.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 18, 2019

Mr. Cisneros (for himself and Mr. Fitzpatrick) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend increased dependency 
 and indemnity compensation paid to surviving spouses of veterans who 
  die from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, regardless of how long the 
               veterans had such disease prior to death.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Justice for ALS Veterans Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF INCREASED DEPENDENCY AND INDEMNITY COMPENSATION TO 
              SURVIVING SPOUSES OF VETERANS WHO DIE FROM AMYOTROPHIC 
              LATERAL SCLEROSIS.

    (a) Extension.--Section 1311(a)(2) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(A)'' before ``The rate''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
    ``(B) A veteran whom the Secretary determines died from amyotrophic 
lateral sclerosis shall be treated as a veteran described in 
subparagraph (A) without regard for how long the veteran had such 
disease prior to death.''.
    (b) Applicability.--Subparagraph (B) of section 1311(a)(2) of title 
38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply to a 
veteran who dies from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis on or after October 
1, 2019.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 1,352

 1,308

 1,585

 1,964

 1,382

 1,306

 1,707

 2,709

 3,112

 3,737

 3,625

 5,608

 7,185

 7,854

 9,882

 9,744

 9,020

 6,849

 5,485

 4,781

 5,152

 4,796

 5,738

 7,735

 8,854

 7,798

 8,671

 8,510

 8,294

 8,332

 169

 173

 169

 210

 175

 197

 204

 262

 329

 260

 333

 384

 543

 651

 966

 1,306

 1,116

 979

 1,136

 1,209

 1,079

 1,215

 1,026

 1,648

 1,653

 1,097

 1,191

 1,135

 1,000

 1,008

 623

 646

 762

 902

 772

 713

 762

 1,045

 1,315

 1,385

 1,562

 2,295

 3,125

 3,614

 4,453

 4,761

 4,453

 3,751

 3,477

 3,159

 2,744

 2,591

 2,857

 4,555

 4,680

 4,001

 4,315

 4,283

 4,138

 4,241

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 16, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-30860

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TARZAREO JONES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:17-CR-42-1

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Tarzareo Jones has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Jones has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 3, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-30860 Document: 00514539157 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/03/2018
No. 17-30860

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-30860 Document: 00514539157 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/03/2018
### §7008. Administrative matters

#### (a) Employment status

Individuals appointed under section 7002, 7003, 7004, or 7005 of this title, other than officers or employees of the United States Government, shall not be considered to be Federal employees while performing such service, except for purposes of injury compensation or tort claims liability as provided in chapter 81 of title 5 and chapter 171 of title 28.

#### (b) Compensation

#### (1) In general

Except as provided in paragraph (2), an individual appointed under this chapter shall receive no compensation for the individual's service as a representative, alternate representative, scientific expert, or advisory panel member under this chapter.

#### (2) Scientific review group

Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the Secretary may employ and fix the compensation of an individual appointed under section 7003(a) of this title to serve as a scientific expert on the scientific review group who is not employed by the United States Government, a State government, or an Indian tribal government in accordance with section 3109 of title 5.

#### (c) Travel expenses

Except as provided in subsection (d), the Secretary shall pay the necessary travel expenses of individuals appointed under this chapter in accordance with the Federal Travel Regulations and sections 5701, 5702, 5704 through 5708, and 5731 of title 5.

#### (d) Joint appointees

With respect to the 2 independent members of the scientific review group and the 2 public advisors to the scientific review group jointly appointed under section 7003(c) of this title, and the 1 independent member to the joint technical committee jointly appointed under section 7004(b) of this title, the Secretary may pay up to 50 percent of—

(1) any compensation paid to such individuals; and

(2) the necessary travel expenses of such individuals.

(Pub. L. 109–479, title VI, §609, Jan. 12, 2007, 120 Stat. 3647; Pub. L. 111–348, title III, §302(b), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3672.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2011—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 111–348 amended subsec. (a) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Individuals appointed under section 7002, 7003, 7004, or 7005 of this title who are serving as such Commissioners, other than officers or employees of the United States Government, shall be considered to be Federal employees while performing such service, only for purposes of—

"(1) injury compensation under chapter 81 of title 5;

"(2) requirements concerning ethics, conflicts of interest, and corruption as provided under title 18; and

"(3) any other criminal or civil statute or regulation governing the conduct of Federal employees."
### §3507. Special master at foreign deposition

Upon application of a party to a criminal case, a United States district court before which the case is pending may, to the extent permitted by a foreign country, appoint a special master to carry out at a deposition taken in that country such duties as the court may direct, including presiding at the deposition or serving as an advisor on questions of United States law. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a special master appointed under this section shall not decide questions of privilege under foreign law. The refusal of a court to appoint a special master under this section, or of the foreign country to permit a special master appointed under this section to carry out a duty at a deposition in that country, shall not affect the admissibility in evidence of a deposition taken under the provisions of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §1217(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2166.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 30 days after Oct. 12, 1984, see section 1220 of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as a note under section 3505 of this title.
#### Louis Jaeger *v.*Jacob Dieden.

*Verdict—presumption in favor of its correctness.*Where the evidence is irreconcilably conflicting, it is the province of the jury to weigh, consider and find where the truth is, and the presumption is that their finding is correct.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas F. Tiptoe, Judge, presiding.

*613Mr. William T. Butler, for the appellant.

Mr. H. D. P. Hosier, for the appellee.

Mr. Chief Justice Walker

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an action of trespass *vi et armis,*brought by appellee, in the Superior Court of Cook county, against appellant. The declaration was in the usual form. To it were filed the general issue and a plea of *molliter manus imposuit.*A trial was had before the court and a jury, resulting in a verdict in favor of plaintiff, and $800 damages. On the motion for a new trial, the court expressed dissatisfaction with the damages, and informed appellee’s counsel that, if he would remit $500, he would overrule the motion for a new trial and render a judgment for the balance. A *remittitur*was entered and the judgment so rendered. Defendant brings the case to this court, on appeal, and asks a reversal.

The only question raised on the record is, whether the evidence sustains the verdict. An examination shows that the evidence is irreconcilably conflicting. It is the province of the jury to weigh, consider, and find where the truth is. This they have done, after seeing the witnesses testify, and are better able to estimate the worth of the evidence than persons not having seen or heard them testify, and the presumption is, that they have found correctly. An examination of the evidence fails to overcome that presumption, and the judgment must be affirmed.

*Judgment afirmed.*