alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### 1 Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 4474 Directorate Identifier: 2015

- NE

- 34

- AD

Add the work hours, parts cost, and number o f U.S. registered products to the table below. When you are

finished, click on the “Update Fields” button to automatically fill in the totals.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

cost

(@$85/ h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection 12 $1,020.0

0 0 $1,020.00 763 $778,260.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 778,260

Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

On

- Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

Inspection $ 0 .00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

### 2

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) :

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * ☐ NO ☒

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * ☐ NO ☒

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES ☐ NO ☒

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirem ents for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * ☐ NO ☒



### * Explanation 

### :

### 3
#### § 236.6 Information regarding detainees.

No person, including any state or local government entity or any privately operated detention facility, that houses, maintains, provides services to, or otherwise holds any detainee on behalf of the Service (whether by contract or otherwise), and no other person who by virtue of any official or contractual relationship with such person obtains information relating to any detainee, shall disclose or otherwise permit to be made public the name of, or other information relating to, such detainee. Such information shall be under the control of the Service and shall be subject to public disclosure only pursuant to the provisions of applicable federal laws, regulations and executive orders. Insofar as any documents or other records contain such information, such documents shall not be public records. This section applies to all persons and information identified or described in it, regardless of when such persons obtained such information, and applies to all requests for public disclosure of such information, including requests that are the subject of proceedings pending as of April 17, 2002.

[67 FR 19511, Apr. 22, 2002]
§ 367.62 What requirements apply if the State's non-Federal share is in cash? ( a ) Expenditures that meet the non-Federal share requirements of 2 CFR 200.306 may be used to meet the non-Federal share matching requirement. Expenditures used as non-Federal share must also meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) The expenditures are made with funds made available by appropriation directly to the DSA or with funds made available by allotment or transfer from any other unit of State or local government;
( 2 ) The expenditures are made with cash contributions from a donor that are deposited in the account of the DSA in accordance with State law for expenditure by, and at the sole discretion of, the DSA for activities authorized by § 367.3; or
( 3 ) The expenditures are made with cash contributions from a donor that are earmarked for meeting the State's share for activities listed in § 367.3;
( b ) Cash contributions are permissible under paragraph (a)(3) of this section only if the cash contributions are not used for expenditures that benefit or will benefit in any way the donor, an individual to whom the donor is related by blood or marriage or with whom the donor has a close personal relationship, or an individual, entity, or organization with whom the donor shares a financial interest.
( c ) The receipt of a subaward or contract under section 752(g) of the Act from the DSA is not considered a benefit to the donor of a cash contribution for purposes of paragraph (b) of this section if the subaward or contract was awarded under the State's regular competitive procedures. The State may not exempt the awarding of the subaward or contract from its regular competitive procedures.
( d ) For purposes of this section, a donor may be a private agency, a profit-making or nonprofit organization, or an individual.
(Authority: Section 752(f) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 796k(f))
Summary: NPS Managers Circumvented Contracting Regulations 

to Pay Over $1 Million to a Vendor Without Competition 

Report Date: August 5, 2020 Report Number: 19-0473 

We investigated allegations that two National Park Service (NPS) managers violated contracting 

regulations and procedures by using the Standard Form 182 (SF-182), which is meant to fund 

standardized training, to pay a company for extended work on an internal NPS training website. 

We also investigated allegations that NPS employees improperly hired NPS retirees and then reissued or re-activated their Personal Identity Verification (PIV) cards. 

We found that the two NPS managers, who oversaw aspects of NPS training programs, 

improperly used the SF-182 to pay a company $1,041,117 to develop and maintain an internal 

training website, circumventing contracting regulations. The two NPS managers have since left 

the agency. 

We also found that one of the managers retained his PIV card after retiring and had another 

employee re-enable the card after he left Federal service, in violation of departmental policy. We 

also discovered a separate instance in which an NPS retiree performed fiscal and budget-related 

services for an NPS training center without a contract. The NPS retiree received a new PIV card 

under the guise of an unrelated contract. 

This is a summary of an investigative report that we issued to the NPS Deputy Director for 

Operations. 

Office of Investigations | Office of Inspector General | U.S. Department of the Interior | Washington, DC
(No. 74-CC-101

#### Consolidated Oil Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December 3, 1973.*

Consolidated Oil Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LOTUS PACIFIC, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, 1998 AND 1997 AND ARE QUALIFIED IT IS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      30,779,486
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               27,655,975
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,972,965
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            63,983,411
<PP&E>                                       3,104,090
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,235,567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             207,762,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       53,840,846
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          4
<COMMON>                                        63,466
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               207,762,804
<SALES>                                     42,382,795
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            42,574,643
<CGS>                                       37,711,338
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               37,711,338
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,858,790
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,921,629)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,921,629)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (643,658)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,156,687)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)


</TABLE>
(No. 74-CC-11

#### Bloomington Cornbelt Biochemical Lab, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 15, 1973.*

Bloomington Cornbelt Biochemical Lab, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §90b–2. Owner's retention of right of use and occupancy for agricultural, residential, or commercial purposes for life or term of years; transfer or assignment of right; termination of use and occupancy for a contrary use and upon payment of sum for unexpired right

Any owner of property acquired by the Secretary which on the date of acquisition is used for agricultural or single-family residential purposes, or for commercial purposes which he finds are compatible with the use and development of the park or the recreation areas, may, as a condition of such acquisition, retain the right of use and occupancy of the property for the same purposes for which it was used on such date, for a period ending at the death of the owner or the death of his spouse, whichever occurs later, or for a fixed term of not to exceed twenty-five years, whichever the owner may elect. Any right so retained may during its existence be transferred or assigned. Any right so retained may be terminated by the Secretary at any time after the date upon which any use of the property occurs which he finds is a use other than one which existed on the date of acquisition. In the event the Secretary terminates a right of use and occupancy under this section, he shall pay to the owner of the right the fair market value of the portion of said right which remains unexpired on the date of termination.

(Pub. L. 90–544, title III, §303, Oct. 2, 1968, 82 Stat. 928.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 615

 602

 637

 664

 637

 606

 589

 599

 585

 623

 610

 584

 607

 621

 637

 650

 692

 698

 749

 716

 715

 669

 682

 643

 640

 639

 640

 624

 622

 624

 533

 533

 522

 498

 500

 507

 512

 524

 535

 493

 503

 501

 475

 545

 582

 589

 573

 575

 562

 566

 569

 583

 543

 555

 564

 587

 585

 589

 589

 580

 585

 574

 556

 550

 544

 545

 548

 560

 568

 568

 561

 559

 559

 587

 606

 617

 605

 609

 616

 617

 614

 615

 615

 612

 606

 612

 614

 610

 608

 600

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 2, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 378

 371

 360

 356

 352

 353

 355

 362

 367

 367

 363

 361

 361

 379

 391

 397

 390

 392

 397

 397

 395

 396

 396

 394

 391

 394

 395

 393

 392

 387

TOTAL 17,640

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Dental Patient Care America,
Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Michael
Silva, Chief Executive Officer and Brad Berrett, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


Dated: November 11, 2004

/s/ Michael Silva
-----------------------
Michael Silva
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Brad Berrett
-----------------------
Brad Berrett
Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-112365, Form S-8 No. 333-72444and Form S-8 No. 333-42904) pertaining to the California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1998 Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plan and 1990 Employee Stock Option Plan of our report dated January 29, 2004, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 28, 2003. 

 

/s/    Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Long Beach, California 

March 11, 2004
### §760b. Equipment for studies; cooperation of Federal departments and agencies

The Secretary is directed to make application through appropriate channels to other Federal departments or agencies for such boats and other equipment in custody of such departments or agencies as may be suitable for studies authorized hereunder, and such Federal departments and agencies are authorized to transfer such boats and other equipment to the Department of Commerce without reimbursement of funds.

(Aug. 25, 1950, ch. 782, §2, 64 Stat. 474; 1970 Reorg. Plan No. 4, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Department of Commerce" substituted in text for "Department of the Interior" in view of transfer of functions to Secretary of Commerce from Secretary of the Interior by Reorg. Plan No. 4 of 1970, see note set out under section 755 of this title.
### **CHAPTER 4—COPYRIGHT NOTICE, DEPOSIT, AND REGISTRATION**

Sec.
401.
Notice of copyright: Visually perceptible copies.
402.
Notice of copyright: Phonorecords of sound recordings.
403.
Notice of copyright: Publications incorporating United States Government works.
404.
Notice of copyright: Contributions to collective works.
405.
Notice of copyright: Omission of notice on certain copies and phonorecords.
406.
Notice of copyright: Error in name or date on certain copies and phonorecords.
407.
Deposit of copies or phonorecords for Library of Congress.
408.
Copyright registration in general.
409.
Application for copyright registration.
410.
Registration of claim and issuance of certificate.
411.
Registration and civil infringement actions.
412.
Registration as prerequisite to certain remedies for infringement.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2008**—Pub. L. 110–403, title I, §101(b)(2), Oct. 13, 2008, 122 Stat. 4258, inserted "civil" before "infringement" in item 411.

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–568, §§7(g), 9(b)(2), Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2859, inserted in items 405 and 406 "on certain copies and phonorecords" and substituted in item 411 "Registration and infringement actions" for "Registration as prerequisite to infringement suit".
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002





In connection
with the Annual Report of Clancy Systems International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Tony Nick, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Dated: September 26, 2019



|By: | /s/ Tony Nick                                                                                                
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    | Name: Tony Nick                                                                                              
|    | Title: Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 749

 724

 609

 763

 701

 640

 644

 588

 647

 775

 782

 804

 773

 779

 796

 758

 821

 777

 722

 718

 692

 789

 790

 772

 740

 823

 841

 843

 839

 849

 849

 707

 191

 500

 479

 564

 427

 420

 393

 441

 611

 745

 714

 651

 611

 659

 695

 675

 635

 531

 534

 381

 465

 738

 638

 631

 686

 755

 765

 743

 797

 813

 736

 624

 554

 557

 642

 511

 522

 481

 533

 692

 766

 770

 714

 698

 745

 728

 744

 716

 628

 614

 588

 597

 771

 692

 683

 774

 814

 810

 806

 827

 832

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 471

 402

 358

 360

 413

 332

 339

 313

 345

 444

 489

 492

 457

 447

 476

 466

 476

 458

 404

 395

 379

 385

 492

 444

 438

 494

 519

 517

 514

 527

 530

TOTAL 21,169

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
#### Carlos G. Lopez, Appellant, v. International Aircraft Trading Co., Inc., et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
§ 657.30 What is the duration of and what are the limitations on fellowships awarded to individuals by institutions? ( a ) *Duration.* An institution may award a fellowship to a student for— ( 1 ) One academic year; or
( 2 ) One summer session if the summer session provides the fellow with the equivalent of one academic year of modern foreign language study.
( b ) *Vacancies.* If a fellow vacates a fellowship before the end of an award period, the institution to which the fellowship is allocated may reaward the balance of the fellowship to another student if— ( 1 ) The student meets the eligibility requirements in § 657.3; and
( 2 ) The remaining fellowship period comprises at least one full academic quarter, semester, trimester, or summer session as described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1122)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 182

 183

 184

 185

 186

 186

 185

 187

 188

 189

 190

 190

 200

 211

 215

 210

 211

 204

 179

 144

 163

 181

 192

 195

 182

 180

 164

 169

 154

 176

 180

 180

 180

 182

 183

 180

 179

 181

 183

 186

 187

 184

 188

 200

 210

 208

 203

 182

 135

 127

 134

 151

 152

 132

 134

 134

 134

 127

 125

 148

 181

 182

 182

 184

 185

 183

 184

 185

 186

 187

 189

 188

 191

 206

 213

 209

 208

 196

 153

 132

 142

 166

 166

 154

 155

 149

 148

 139

 141

 160

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 1, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 128

 128

 128

 130

 130

 129

 130

 130

 131

 132

 133

 132

 134

 143

 148

 145

 145

 137

 111

 98

 104

 119

 119

 111

 112

 108

 107

 102

 103

 115

TOTAL 5,244

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5037 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5037

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 10, 2020

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 3703 North Main Street in Farmville, North Carolina, as the ``Walter 
                      B. Jones, Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WALTER B. JONES, JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3703 North Main Street in Farmville, North Carolina, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Walter B. Jones, Jr. Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Walter B. 
Jones, Jr. Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 5, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```