alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 5.40 Appeals of adverse determinations. ( a ) *In general.* A requester may seek an administrative review of an adverse determination on the FOIA request made by the requester by submitting an appeal of the determination to the Department. Adverse determinations include denials of access to agency records, in whole or in part; “no agency records” responses; and adverse fee decisions, including denials of requests for fee waivers, and all aspects of fee assessments.
( b ) *Appeal requirements.* A requester must submit an appeal within 90 calendar days of the date on the adverse determination letter issued by the Department or, where the requester has received no determination, at any time after the due date for such determination. An appeal must be in writing and must include a detailed statement of all legal and factual bases for the appeal.
( c ) *Determination on appeal.* ( 1 ) The Department makes a written determination on an administrative appeal within 20 working days after receiving the appeal. The time limit may be extended in accordance with § 5.21(c) through (e). The Department's failure to comply with time limits set forth in this section constitutes exhaustion of the requester's administrative remedies for the purposes of initiating judicial action to compel disclosure.
( 2 ) The Department's determination on an appeal constitutes the Department's final action on the FOIA request. Any Department determination denying an appeal in whole or in part includes the reasons for the denial, including any exemptions asserted under the Act, and notice of the requester's right to seek judicial review of the determination in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4). Where the Department makes a determination to grant an appeal in whole or in part, it processes the FOIA request subject to the appeal in accordance with the determination on appeal.
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6), 20 U.S.C. 3474)
[75 FR 33510, June 14, 2010, as amended at 84 FR 67868, Dec. 12, 2019; 89 FR 5098, Jan. 26, 2024; 89 FR 12244, Feb. 16, 2024]
Application For Exemption for Imraan Saleh

1160 Boulder Creek Dr,

Hayward CA, 94544

imraansaleh@gmail.com

(510) 372­3362

To whom this may concern,

Hi, my name is Imraan Saleh and I am petitioning for my aerial photography company.

I fly a DJI Phantom 3 and a DJI Inspire 1, both of which weigh less than 5 lbs.

My company is named Imraan Saleh Media and I get paid to take pictures and videos at

weddings and events.

If granted the exemption I plan on contacting local authorities such as the police and the local

fire departments and seeing if I can help with the process of incorporating drones into search

and rescue missions.

I have over a year experience flying both the DJI Phantom 3 and Inspire 1.

My number one concern is always safety I never fly my drone in any circumstances that would

potentially harm someone. I am always extra cautions when flying the drone and always have a

partner assisting me when flying.

I also have experience at Hivemapper a drone app company. In which I beta tested the drone

app while flying both a DJI phantom vision 2+, DJI phantom 3, and a DJI Inspire 1. At hive

mapper I logged in 3 months of 40 hours a week where I would beta test the Hivemapper drone

app while flying a DJI phantom 2,3, or Inspire. In addition to over a year of experience of flying

my own drones I gained valuable flying experience flying everyday all around the bay area,

California for 40+ hours a week, in which I always practiced safe flying practices.

I also have been contracted by numerous wedding photographers and wedding videographers

where I gained a lot of valuable experience and always practiced safe flying practices.

I have read numerous articles and I’m very familiar with the current drone rules and regulations

and never come close to infringing them.
Safety is my number one concern.

I am very knowledgeable and experienced about flying and never put the drone in a position

that may potentially jeopardize anyones safety.

I always conduct a preflight safety check in which I check the propellers, the drone body, and

battery before taking off, making sure the drone is in optimal flying condition and I always make

sure I calibrate my drone before every take off.

I only fly when I have 7+ GPS satellite locked onto the drone and the DJI GO app status

indicator reads "SAFE TO FLY”.

I always have an assistant present when flying.

I always have my drone in my visual line of sight (VLOS), and plan my flight path before taking

off.

I never fly the drone within a 5 mile radius of an airport.

I never fly the drone higher than 200 feet.

I am in the process of getting liability insurance for my drone, just to be safe. I do strongly

believe drone can be used to help the world, and think I will be involved with drones for some

time so I have no issue getting insurance.

I notify local authors whenever I am going to fly my drone.

Again, my number one priority is safety.

I really believe in drone technology and believe I can use it to help better my community.

Thanks You

­ Imraan Saleh

My address is:

1160 Boulder Creek Drive

Hayward, CA

94544

Contact information:

imraansaleh@gmail.com

(510) 372­3362
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE SECOND AMENDED & RESTATED 1999 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN



 Exhibit 10.2 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO 
 HOLOGIC, INC. 
 SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED 1999 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

 The following amendment to the Hologic, Inc. (the “Corporation”) Second Amended and Restated 1999 Equity Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”), upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, was approved by the Board of Directors of the Corporation on June 25, 2007, subject to the approval of the stockholders of the Corporation: 
 1. Section 5, Paragraph (a) is amended by deleting the first sentence of this paragraph and replacing it with the following: 
 “Effective on the effective time of the merger between the Corporation and Cytyc Corporation
pursuant to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 20, 2007, by and among the Corporation, Cytyc Corporation and Nor’easter Corp., subject to adjustment under subsection (b), the maximum aggregate number of shares of
common stock available for issuance under the Plan is 600,000 shares, plus (A) an annual increase to be made on the first day of each fiscal year equal to the lesser of (i) 2 1/2% of the Issued Shares (as defined below) on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year, (ii) 1,000,000 shares, or (iii) an amount
determined by the board of directors, plus (B) 4,000,000 shares.” 
 2. Except as amended hereby, the Second Amended and
Restated 1999 Equity Incentive Plan shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its original terms. 
 Approved by the Board of Directors:
June 25, 2007 
 Approved by Stockholders: October 18, 2007
§ 300.605 Withholding funds. ( a ) *Opportunity for hearing.* Prior to withholding any funds under Part B of the Act, the Secretary provides reasonable notice and an opportunity for a hearing to the SEA involved, pursuant to the procedures in §§ 300.180 through 300.183.
( b ) *Suspension.* Pending the outcome of any hearing to withhold payments under paragraph (a) of this section, the Secretary may suspend payments to a recipient, suspend the authority of the recipient to obligate funds under Part B of the Act, or both, after the recipient has been given reasonable notice and an opportunity to show cause why future payments or authority to obligate funds under Part B of the Act should not be suspended.
( c ) *Nature of withholding.* ( 1 ) If the Secretary determines that it is appropriate to withhold further payments under § 300.604(b)(2) or (c)(2), the Secretary may determine— ( i ) That the withholding will be limited to programs or projects, or portions of programs or projects, that affected the Secretary's determination under § 300.603(b)(1); or
( ii ) That the SEA must not make further payments under Part B of the Act to specified State agencies or LEAs that caused or were involved in the Secretary's determination under § 300.603(b)(1).
( 2 ) Until the Secretary is satisfied that the condition that caused the initial withholding has been substantially rectified— ( i ) Payments to the State under Part B of the Act must be withheld in whole or in part; and
( ii ) Payments by the SEA under Part B of the Act must be limited to State agencies and LEAs whose actions did not cause or were not involved in the Secretary's determination under § 300.603(b)(1), as the case may be.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1416(e)(4), (e)(6))
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean TDS

1 570 559 567 366

2 588 566 580 374

3 590 541 578 373

4 575 542 557 360

5 585 550 565 365

6 557 543 548 355

7 0 0 0 0

8 0 0 0 0

9 0 0 0 0

10 0 0 0 0

11 0 0 0 0

12 0 0 0 0

13 0 0 0 0

14 0 0 0 0

15 0 0 0 0

16 0 0 0 0

17 0 0 0 0

18 0 0 0 0

19 0 0 0 0

20 0 0 0 0

21 571 568 570 368

22 585 570 575 371

23 586 572 577 373

24 578 567 573 370

25 573 557 563 364

26 556 543 549 355

27 550 533 538 348

28 533 515 522 339

29 527 514 518 336

30 521 506 513 333

31 516 502 507 329

Total 9400

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Check 21 

Period: July 2022 Run Date: 11/22/2022
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsResin selection criteria for tough composite structuresResin selection criteria are derived using a structured methodology consisting of an upward integrated mechanistic theory and its inverse (top-down structured theory). These criteria are expressed in a "criteria selection space" which are used to identify resin bulk properties for improved composite "toughness". The resin selection criteria correlate with a variety of experimental data including laminate strength, elevated temperature effects and impact resistance.Document ID19840002243Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsChamis, C. C.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Smith, G. T.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateMay 4, 1983Subject CategoryNonmetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-83449E-1762NAS 1.15:83449Meeting InformationMeeting: Structures, Structural Dyn. and Mater. ConferenceLocation: Lake Tahoe, NVCountry: United StatesStart Date: May 2, 1983End Date: May 4, 1983Sponsors:AIAA,ASCE,AHS,ASMEAccession Number84N10310Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-33-52Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840002243.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §1170. Illegal trafficking in Native American human remains and cultural items

(a) Whoever knowingly sells, purchases, uses for profit, or transports for sale or profit, the human remains of a Native American without the right of possession to those remains as provided in the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act shall be fined in accordance with this title, or imprisoned not more than 1 year and 1 day, or both, and in the case of a second or subsequent violation, be fined in accordance with this title, or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.

(b) Whoever knowingly sells, purchases, uses for profit, or transports for sale or profit any Native American cultural items obtained in violation of the Native American Grave Protection and Repatriation Act shall be fined in accordance with this title, imprisoned not more than one year, or both, and in the case of a second or subsequent violation, be fined in accordance with this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.

(Added Pub. L. 101–601, §4(a), Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3052; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330010(4), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2143; Pub. L. 117–258, §4, Dec. 21, 2022, 136 Stat. 2374.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 101–601, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3048, which is classified principally to chapter 32 (§3001 et seq.) of Title 25, Indians. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3001 of Title 25 and Tables.

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–258 substituted "1 year and 1 day" for "12 months" and "10 years" for "5 years".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 117–258, §4(1), substituted "10 years" for "5 years".

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "Illegal trafficking in Native American human remains and cultural items" for "Illegal Trafficking in Native American Human Remains and Cultural Items" in section catchline.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

 RICHMOND DIVISION 

In re Russell S. Parrish 

 Jay M. Parrish 

Debtors Case No. 19-31632-KLP 

Chapter 13 

 Judge Kevin R. Huennekens 

 MOTION OF DEBTORS FOR EXTENSION 

 OF TIME TO FILE CHAPTER 13 PLAN AND SCHEDULES/STATEMENTS 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ANY PARTY OBJECTING TO THE EXTENSION OF 

TIME REQUESTED HEREIN SHALL FILE WRITTEN OBJECTIONS WITH THE COURT 

WITHIN FIVE BUSINESS DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF THE MOTION BY THE DEBTOR 

Come now Russell and Jay Parrish, the above-named debtors and 

debtors in possession, through counsel, and move this court 

pursuant to Fed R Bankr P 9006 for an order granting them an 

extension of time to file their Schedules, Statements and Chapter 

13 plan as mandated by Fed R Bankr P 3015. The Petition Date in 

this case is March 27, 2019, and this Motion is timely made before 

the expiration of the date for filing their Schedules and Chapter 

13 Plan. Further, the date for the first meeting of creditors in 

this case under 11 USC Section 341 has been set for May 16, 2019, 

at 9:00 am, a date after the date the schedules, statements and 

plan would be due if this motion were granted. As grounds for their 

Motion, the Debtors respectfully state that they are still 

gathering information for counsel in order to complete the 

schedules, statements and plan due to the fact that this case was 

filed the same day they first met with counsel due to possible tax 

lien issues. 

Dated: 4/9/2019 Respectfully submitted, 

 Russell and Jay Parrish 

 

 By: _/s/ Ellen P. Ray_____ 

 Ellen P. Ray, Esq. 

 1701 W. Main Street 

 Richmond, VA 23220 

 (804) 355-1800 

 Va. St. Bar No. 32286 

 Counsel for Debtor 

 

 CERTIFICATE AND PROOF OF SERVICE

 

 I certify that on the 26th day of July, 2016, I served a 

copy of the foregoing notice on the United States Trustee, 701 E. 

Broad Street, Rm 4304, Richmond, VA 23219 and Suzanne Wade, 

Trustee, PO Box 1780, Richmond, VA 23218-1780 as well as all 

creditors as listed on the matrix attached hereto. 

 __/s/ Ellen P. Ray____________ 

Case 19-31632-KRH Doc 14 Filed 04/09/19 Entered 04/09/19 13:08:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
 Ellen P. Ray 

Case 19-31632-KRH Doc 14 Filed 04/09/19 Entered 04/09/19 13:08:16 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00315-CV

Carlos Banks, Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 419TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-FM-07-006157, HONORABLE SCOTT H. JENKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Carlos Banks has filed an unopposed motion requesting this Court to

dismiss the instant appeal and issue mandate immediately upon dismissal. We grant the motion and

dismiss the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). We further instruct the clerk of this Court to issue the

mandate upon dismissal of the appeal.

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Pemberton

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: September 11, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on the agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    . Copies of the agreements are available through the Commission's Web site (                    *http://www.fmc.gov*) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:*                     011790-001.                

*Title:*                     Dole Ocean Cargo Express/King Ocean Services Limited Space Charter Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     Dole Ocean Cargo Express, Inc., and King Ocean Services Limited.                

*Filing Party:*                     Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Cozen O'Connor; 1627 I Street, NW. Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006.                

*Synopsis:*                     The amendment would provide for chartering of space on an “as needed as available” basis, update the address of King Ocean, and restate the Agreement.                

*Agreement No.:*                     012088-001.                

*Title:*                     Hanjin and WHS Transpacific Vessel Sharing and Slot Allocation Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd. and Wan Hai Lines (Singapore) PTE. Ltd.                

*Filing Party:*                     Robert B. Yoshitomi, Esq.; Nixon Peabody LLP; Gas Company Tower; 555 West Fifth Street, 46th Floor; Los Angeles, CA 90013.                

*Synopsis:*                     The amendment would add COSCON as a party to the Agreement and revise the name of the Agreement to Hanjin/WHS/COSCON Transpacific Vessel Sharing and Slot Allocation Agreement.                

Dated: March 18, 2011.

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Karen V. Gregory, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-6859 Filed 3-22-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
§ 361.51 Standards for facilities and providers of services. ( a ) *Accessibility of facilities.* The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must assure that any facility used in connection with the delivery of vocational rehabilitation services under this part meets program accessibility requirements consistent with the requirements, as applicable, of the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, section 504 of the Act, and the regulations implementing these laws.
( b ) *Affirmative action.* The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must assure that community rehabilitation programs that receive assistance under part B of title I of the Act take affirmative action to employ and advance in employment qualified individuals with disabilities covered under and on the same terms and conditions as in section 503 of the Act.
( c ) *Special communication needs personnel.* The designated State unit must ensure that providers of vocational rehabilitation services are able to communicate— ( 1 ) In the native language of applicants and eligible individuals who have limited English proficiency; and
( 2 ) By using appropriate modes of communication used by applicants and eligible individuals.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1205-0522) (Authority: Sections 12(c) and 101(a)(6)(B) and (C) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 721(a)(6)(B) and (C))
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 627

 695

 690

 714

 697

 653

 615

 639

 0

 0

 0

 524

 539

 538

 564

 585

 565

 491

 485

 482

 489

 514

 523

 511

 517

 517

 526

 498

 517

 495

 464

 590

 596

 628

 665

 662

 610

 606

 615

 0

 0

 0

 524

 525

 515

 528

 551

 471

 475

 438

 435

 467

 471

 490

 489

 502

 491

 490

 487

 494

 464

 428

 612

 645

 651

 693

 685

 622

 611

 623

 0

 0

 0

 524

 530

 525

 545

 570

 518

 481

 459

 452

 477

 495

 507

 501

 508

 501

 510

 490

 505

 482

 443

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 22, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 394

 415

 418

 444

 439

 400

 394

 401

 0

 0

 0

 340

 344

 340

 353

 368

 336

 313

 300

 295

 311

 322

 329

 326

 330

 326

 331

 319

 328

 314

 290

TOTAL 15,165

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20