alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SIDEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNILOY MILACRON INC., Defendant-Appellee, and Ryka Blow Molds Ltd., Defendant. *684Sidel, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Uniloy Milacron Inc., Defendant-Appellant, and Ryka Blow Molds Ltd., Defendant.

No. 02-1141, 02-1142.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: March 14, 2002.

ON MOTION

Before MICHEL, BRYSON, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

MICHEL, Circuit Judge.

Sidel moves to dismiss Uniloy Milacron Inc.’s appeal no. 02-1142 for lack of jurisdiction or, in the alternative, for lack of standing. Uniloy opposes. Sidel replies.

Sidel sued Uniloy for infringement in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia and moved for a preliminary injunction. The district court denied the motion determining that Sidel had not made a clear or strong showing of likelihood of success on the issue of contributory infringement and had failed to show irreparable harm. While Uniloy ultimately prevailed, the district court construed claim 1 of the patent in suit contrary to Uniloy’s preferred construction and further noted that, “the court assumes without deciding that Sidel can make a clear showing that its patent would survive a validity challenge.”

Sidel appealed from the order denying its motion for a preliminary injunction. On the basis of the district court’s claim construction and statement concerning validity, Uniloy cross-appealed. Sidel argues that because Uniloy prevailed below and is not seeking review of the district court’s denial of the injunction, Uniloy’s cross-appeal cannot be maintained. We agree.

An “appellee may, without taking a cross-appeal, urge in support of a decree any matter appearing in the record, although his argument may involve an attack upon the reasoning of the lower court or an insistence upon matter overlooked or ignored by it.” *United States v. American Ry. Express Co.,*265 U.S. 425, 435, 44 S.Ct. 560, 68 L.Ed. 1087 (1924); *see also Datascope Corp. v. SMEC, Inc.,*879 F.2d 820, 822 n. 1 (Fed.Cir.1989) (“Appellees always have the right to assert alternative grounds for affirming the judgment that are supported by the record.”). Uniloy *685prevailed in district court, that is, the district court denied Sidel’s motion for a preliminary injunction. Uniloy may, as an appellee, challenge the alleged unfavorable aspects of the district court’s order. What is at stake here, from Uniloy’s perspective, is only whether it be permitted to file two rather than one brief. What it may argue in its brief is not at stake.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

> (1) Sidel’s motion to dismiss Uniloy’s appeal no. 02-1142 is granted.

> (2) Each side shall bear its own costs pertaining to appeal no. 02-1142.

> (3) The revised official caption for appeal no. 02-1141 is reflected above.
1

Ngo, Dan (FAA)

From: Ngo, Dan (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 4:49 PM

To: 'david@hazonsolutions.com'; 'info@hazonsolutions.com'

Subject: Request for Information - FAA-2015-0218

Dear Mr. Culler: 

This letter is to inform you that we have received and reviewed your request for an amendment to 

Exemption No. 11442, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0218. Upon initial review, it was determined 

that more information was needed in order to move forward with your amendment. This information is 

necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your full amendment. 

 Please clarify the power source (i.e. battery/gas/propane-powered) for the aircraft below. The 

list represents an initial assessment of the aircraft that the FAA is unable to move forward with.

1. Micro UAV Hazon Hex 

2. Formica X4 

3. Sealed Bubble X8 

4. Formica X8 

5. FlyAbility Gimball 

6. UAV America Mule Quad 

Please make any needed changes to the list, and submit the additional information (non-proprietary) 

to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send 

a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment 

tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to 

process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by January 27, 

2016. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

Regards, 

Dan Ngo 

Office of Rulemaking, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division 

Federal Aviation Administration
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 760

 849

 821

 971

 995

 901

 1,008

 1,004

 1,031

 1,012

 962

 985

 1,021

 1,028

 1,047

 1,006

 1,046

 1,017

 1,023

 1,005

 1,017

 1,001

 1,011

 1,010

 993

 988

 1,001

 1,009

 510

 451

 322

 336

 329

 300

 286

 269

 275

 309

 270

 246

 245

 240

 243

 240

 246

 263

 229

 239

 246

 251

 270

 254

 271

 251

 253

 250

 642

 665

 575

 609

 602

 589

 559

 539

 622

 624

 536

 554

 543

 551

 551

 447

 446

 638

 552

 528

 562

 548

 614

 586

 546

 504

 515

 520

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 4, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 413

 427

 371

 392

 388

 380

 361

 349

 400

 402

 347

 358

 352

 357

 357

 292

 292

 410

 357

 342

 363

 355

 395

 378

 353

 327

 334

 337

TOTAL 15,767

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
### §2390. Enlistment to serve against United States

Whoever enlists or is engaged within the United States or in any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof, with intent to serve in armed hostility against the United States, shall be fined under this title 1 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 812; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(B), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2146.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §8 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §8, 35 Stat. 1089).

Mandatory punishment provision was rephrased in the alternative.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322, which directed the amendment of this section by striking "fined not more than $100" and inserting "fined under this title", was executed by substituting "fined under this title" for "fined $100", to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

1 See 1994 Amendment note below.
Case 19-32564-KRH Doc Filed 12/19/19 Entered 12/19/19 13:58:23 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 6
Case 19-32564-KRH Doc Filed 12/19/19 Entered 12/19/19 13:58:23 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 6
Case 19-32564-KRH Doc Filed 12/19/19 Entered 12/19/19 13:58:23 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 6
Case 19-32564-KRH Doc Filed 12/19/19 Entered 12/19/19 13:58:23 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 6
Case 19-32564-KRH Doc Filed 12/19/19 Entered 12/19/19 13:58:23 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 6
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

RICHMOND DIVISION 

In Re: Case No. 19-32564-KRH

Juanita Ellis Russell Chapter 13

Debtor. Judge Kevin R. Huennekens

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that on December 19, 2019, a copy of the foregoing Notice of Mortgage Payment 

Change was filed electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent to the following party/parties 

through the Court’s ECF System. Party/Parties may access this filing through the Court’s system: 

Richard S. Clinger, Debtor’s Counsel 

rclinger2@verizon.net 

Carl M. Bates, Chapter 13 Trustee 

station01@richchap13.com 

John P. Fitzgerald, III, Office of the United States Trustee 

I further certify that on December 19, 2019, a copy of the foregoing Notice of Mortgage Payment 

Change was mailed by first-class U.S. Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed to the 

following: 

Juanita Ellis Russell, Debtor 

4412 Fulton St. 

Richmond, VA 23231 

Dated: December 19, 2019 /s/ D. Anthony Sottile

 D. Anthony Sottile 

Authorized Agent for Creditor 

Sottile & Barile, LLC 

394 Wards Corner Road, Suite 180 

Loveland, OH 45140 

Phone: 513.444.4100 

Email: bankruptcy@sottileandbarile.com

Case 19-32564-KRH Doc Filed 12/19/19 Entered 12/19/19 13:58:23 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 629

 623

 800

 798

 689

 617

 629

 630

 637

 798

 798

 757

 708

 710

 712

 728

 758

 826

 825

 827

 808

 782

 782

 756

 738

 744

 756

 766

 782

 780

 771

 534

 549

 617

 667

 576

 571

 607

 625

 624

 631

 655

 676

 696

 698

 701

 705

 715

 764

 806

 799

 778

 769

 754

 724

 731

 732

 742

 754

 763

 769

 760

 583

 577

 728

 751

 624

 591

 617

 627

 630

 701

 728

 692

 701

 704

 705

 715

 737

 795

 819

 808

 796

 777

 770

 736

 735

 738

 751

 758

 772

 774

 766

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 20, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 376

 373

 466

 480

 402

 381

 397

 403

 405

 449

 466

 444

 449

 451

 452

 458

 471

 507

 522

 515

 508

 496

 492

 471

 470

 472

 480

 484

 493

 494

 489

TOTAL 22,206

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 329

 332

 388

 412

 409

 416

 391

 403

 415

 405

 413

 401

 418

 391

 354

 220

 192

 197

 177

 178

 176

 166

 166

 167

 172

 175

 181

 184

 185

 184

 182

 215

 282

 337

 387

 372

 376

 325

 306

 315

 338

 298

 337

 350

 319

 220

 162

 165

 167

 169

 176

 164

 163

 163

 164

 167

 172

 175

 179

 179

 181

 180

 281

 302

 359

 400

 391

 397

 365

 362

 380

 373

 359

 379

 404

 358

 274

 194

 178

 177

 175

 177

 169

 165

 165

 166

 169

 173

 178

 182

 183

 183

 181

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 3, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 190

 203

 238

 263

 258

 261

 242

 240

 251

 247

 238

 250

 266

 237

 185

 136

 126

 125

 124

 125

 120

 118

 118

 119

 120

 123

 126

 128

 129

 129

 128

TOTAL 8,199

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
### §718i. Use of contest fees

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, funds received by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service in the form of fees for entering any Migratory Bird Hunting and Conservation Stamp contest shall be credited—

(1) first, to the appropriation account from which expenditures for the administration of the contest are made; and

(2) second, to the extent any funds remain, to the Migratory Bird Conservation Fund.

(Mar. 16, 1934, ch. 71, §9, as added Pub. L. 109–266, §10(h), Aug. 3, 2006, 120 Stat. 678.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 9 of act Mar. 16, 1934, was classified to section 718 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 109–266, §10(h), Aug. 3, 2006, 120 Stat. 677.

A prior section 718i, act June 28, 1941, ch. 259, §1, 55 Stat. 356, related to disposal of surplus stamps and restricted use of stamps to the fiscal year for which issued prior to repeal by act July 30, 1956, ch. 782, §3(d), formerly §3(c), 70 Stat. 722, renumbered Pub. L. 109–266, §10(i)(1), Aug. 3, 2006, 120 Stat. 679.
§ 34.30 Application of payments and accrual of interest. We apply payments received through a garnishment in the following order— ( a ) To costs incurred to collect the debt;
( b ) To interest accrued on the debt at the rate established by— ( 1 ) The terms of the obligation under which it arises; or
( 2 ) Applicable law; and
( c ) To outstanding principal of the debt.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3720D)
### §7401. Purpose

The purpose of this chapter is to implement the Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing.

(Pub. L. 114–81, title III, §302, Nov. 5, 2015, 129 Stat. 664.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 114–81, title III, §301, Nov. 5, 2015, 129 Stat. 664, provided that: "This title [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Port State Measures Agreement Act of 2015'."
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

IN RE:{

ATTYNAME}

MARK ANDERSON, 

DEBTOR.

____________________________________/

CASE NO.: 19-10888-KHK

CHAPTER 13

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT, on behalf of NEWREZ LLC D/B/A SHELLPOINT

MORTGAGE SERVICING ("Secured Creditor”), the undersigned hereby withdraws the

following document:

NOTICE OF MORTGAGE PAYMENT CHANGE FILED CLAIM 5-1 ON SEPTEMBER

24, 2020.

Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid & Crane LLC

Authorized Agent for Secured Creditor

10700 Abbott's Bridge Road, Suite 170, 

Duluth, GA 30097

Telephone: 470-321-7112

By: /s/Darrelyn Thomas

Darrelyn Thomas

Email: dthomas@rascrane.com

Case 19-10888-KHK Doc 79 Filed 10/05/20 Entered 10/05/20 14:59:37 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on , I electronically filed the

foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, and a true and correct copy has

been served via United States Mail to the following:

MARK ANTHONY ANDERSON

1411 ADMIRAL DRIVE

WOODBRIDGE, VA 22192

AND VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL TO:

NATHAN A. FISHER 

FISHER-SANDLER, LLC 

3977 CHAIN BRIDGE ROAD, #2 

FAIRFAX, VA 22030

THOMAS P. GORMAN

300 N. WASHINGTON ST. STE. 400

ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

U.S. TRUSTEE

JOHN P. FITZGERALD, III

OFFICE OF THE U.S. TRUSTEE - REGION 4

1725 DUKE STREET

SUITE 650

ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid & Crane LLC

Authorized Agent for Secured Creditor

10700 Abbott's Bridge Road, Suite 170, 

Duluth, GA 30097

Telephone: 470-321-7112

By: /s/Darrelyn Thomas

October 5, 2020

Case 19-10888-KHK Doc 79 Filed 10/05/20 Entered 10/05/20 14:59:37 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
### §1115. Misconduct or neglect of ship officers

Every captain, engineer, pilot, or other person employed on any steamboat or vessel, by whose misconduct, negligence, or inattention to his duties on such vessel the life of any person is destroyed, and every owner, charterer, inspector, or other public officer, through whose fraud, neglect, connivance, misconduct, or violation of law the life of any person is destroyed, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

When the owner or charterer of any steamboat or vessel is a corporation, any executive officer of such corporation, for the time being actually charged with the control and management of the operation, equipment, or navigation of such steamboat or vessel, who has knowingly and willfully caused or allowed such fraud, neglect, connivance, misconduct, or violation of law, by which the life of any person is destroyed, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 757; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §461 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §282, 35 Stat. 1144).

Section restores the intent of the original enactments, R.S. §5344, and act Mar. 3, 1905, ch. 1454, §5, 33 Stat. 1025, and makes this section one of general application. In the Criminal Code of 1909, by placing it in chapter 11, limited to places within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, such original intent was inadvertently lost as indicated by the entire absence of report or comment on such limitation.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $10,000" in two places.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 704

 672

 710

 634

 548

 524

 536

 560

 545

 555

 556

 540

 551

 566

 566

 573

 564

 530

 582

 612

 615

 631

 648

 600

 608

 591

 594

 603

 633

 614

 605

 587

 590

 585

 545

 492

 491

 498

 538

 536

 540

 539

 520

 529

 544

 537

 541

 506

 497

 524

 566

 568

 595

 600

 536

 504

 498

 571

 592

 595

 562

 516

 669

 642

 653

 611

 518

 509

 519

 546

 540

 547

 549

 529

 540

 554

 551

 557

 537

 516

 560

 597

 590

 618

 628

 567

 576

 534

 582

 597

 613

 588

 566

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 10, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 429

 413

 420

 394

 336

 331

 337

 353

 350

 354

 355

 343

 350

 358

 357

 360

 348

 335

 362

 385

 381

 398

 404

 366

 372

 346

 376

 385

 395

 379

 366

TOTAL 17,703

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
#### Louise Pooler, Respondent, v. Milo Warner, Impleaded with Eugene Ingraham and John C. Murphy, Appellants.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
§ 12.5 Who may apply for surplus Federal real property? The following entities may apply for surplus Federal real property: ( a ) A State.
( b ) A political subdivision or instrumentality of a State.
( c ) A tax-supported institution.
( d ) A nonprofit institution.
( e ) Any combination of these entities.
(Authority: 40 U.S.C. 484(k)(1)(A))
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

EKATERINI V. SINES, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4603

)

RAINA BROWN, as personal )

representative of the Estate of Joshua )

John Williams, deceased; and )

MATTHEW C. SINES, )

)

Appellees. )

)

Opinion filed September 21, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas 

County; Jack Day, Judge.

Ezequiel Lugo of Banker Lopez Gassler 

P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. 

Richard C. Alvarez and Eric R. Maier of 

Older Lundy & Alvarez, Tampa, for 

Appellee Matthew C. Sines.

No appearance for Appellee Raina Brown. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, SLEET, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Newport News Division 

__________________________________________ 

 ) 

In re: ) 

 ) 

INSIGNIA TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, LLC,1

 ) Case No. 19-50277 

 ) 

 Debtor. ) Chapter 11 

__________________________________________) 

CERTIFICATION CONCERNING CREDITOR MATRIX 

Insignia Technology Services, LLC (the “Debtor”), as debtor and debtor-in-possession, 

verifies that the list of creditors, attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “List”), is true and correct to 

the best of its knowledge and consistent with the Debtor’s books and records. The Debtor will 

supplement the List to the extent additional information regarding the Debtor’s creditors becomes 

available. 

The information contained in the List is based upon a review of the Debtor’s books and 

records. The Debtor, however, has not conducted a comprehensive legal or factual investigation 

regarding the accuracy of the information or possible defenses to claims. Consequently, the List is 

not: (i) an acknowledgement of the accuracy of the identity of any creditor, the validity of any 

claim or the amount of any claim, or (ii) a waiver of any right or legal position of the Debtor. 

Dated: March 2, 2019 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Frederick P. O’Brien 

Frederick P. O’Brien 

President and Chief Executive Officer 

Insignia Technology Services, LLC 

 

1

 The last four digits of the Debtor’s federal tax identification number are: 3701. The Debtor’s address is: 610 

Thimble Shoals Boulevard, Building 6, Newport News, Virginia 23606. 

Case 19-50277-SCS Doc 7 Filed 03/02/19 Entered 03/02/19 22:54:17 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
2 

Submitted by: 

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 

By: /s/ Patrick J. Potter 

Patrick J. Potter, VSB No. 37966 

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 

1200 Seventeenth Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20036 

Tel: (202) 663-8928 

Email: patrick.potter@pillsburylaw.com 

Jason S. Sharp, pro hac vice admission pending 

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 

2 Houston Center 

909 Fannin, Suite 2000 

Houston, TX 77010 

Tel: (713) 276-7600 

Email: jason.sharp@pillsburylaw.com 

Andrew V. Alfano, pro hac vice admission pending 

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 

1540 Broadway 

New York, NY 10036 

Tel: (212) 858-1000 

Email: andrew.alfano@pillsburylaw.com 

Proposed Counsel for the Debtor and Debtor in Possession

Case 19-50277-SCS Doc 7 Filed 03/02/19 Entered 03/02/19 22:54:17 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
(No. 74-CC-269

#### University Pharmacy, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 25, 1974.*

University Pharmacy, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Philip Panatella, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                          JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                      0
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            0
<PP&E>                                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  16,395
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                1,018
<OTHER-SE>                                            (17,413)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                0
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            0
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       16,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (16,300)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (16,300)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (16,300)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.02)




</TABLE>