17836 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 62 / Thursday, March 31, 2011 / Notices 

Background 

On June 30, 2010, the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) published 

the initiation of the administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on citric acid and certain citrate salts 

(‘‘citric acid’’) from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Deferral of Administrative 

Review, 75 FR 37759 (June 30, 2010). On 

January 25, 2011, the Department 

published the extension of time limits 

for the preliminary results of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order. See Citric Acid 

and Certain Citrate Salts from the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of 

Extension of Time Limit for the 

Preliminary Results of the Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 4288 

(January 25, 2011). This review covers 

the periods November 20, 2008, through 

May 19, 2009, and May 29, 2009, 

through April 30, 2010. The preliminary 

results of review are currently due no 

later than April 1, 2011. 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results of Review 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the 

Act’’), the Department shall make a 

preliminary determination in an 

administrative review of an 

antidumping duty order within 245 

days after the last day of the anniversary 

month of the date of publication of the 

order. The Act further provides, 

however, that the Department may 

extend that 245-day period to 365 days 

if it determines it is not practicable to 

complete the review within the 

foregoing time period. 

The Department finds that it is not 

practicable to complete the preliminary 

results of the administrative review of 

citric acid from the PRC within this time 

limit. Specifically, additional time is 

needed to examine the respondents’ 

production process, factors of 

production (FOPs), and determine 

surrogate values with which to value 

FOPs. Therefore, in accordance with 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the 

Department is extending the time period 

for completion of the preliminary 

results of this review, which is currently 

due on April 1, 2011, by 60 days. 

Therefore, the preliminary results are 

now due no later than May 31, 2011. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 

and 777(i) of the Act. 

March 25, 2011. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7626 Filed 3–30–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–851] 

Certain Preserved Mushrooms From 

the People’s Republic of China: 

Initiation of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) has received a request 

for a new shipper review (NSR) of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

preserved mushrooms from the People’s 

Republic of China (PRC). In accordance 

with section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 

19 CFR 351.214(d), we are initiating an 

antidumping duty NSR of Zhangzhou 

Long Mountain Foods Co., Ltd. (Long 

Mountain). The period of review (POR) 

of this NSR is February 1, 2010, through 

January 31, 2011. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 31, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred 

Baker, Scott Hoefke, or Robert James, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, 

telephone: (202) 482–2924, (202) 482– 

4947, or (202) 482–0649, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 19, 1999, the Department 

published the antidumping duty order 

on certain preserved mushrooms from 

the PRC. See Notice of Amendment of 

Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty 

Order: Certain Preserved Mushrooms 

From the People’s Republic of China, 64 

FR 8308 (February 19, 1999). Thus, the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

preserved mushrooms from the PRC has 

a February anniversary month. On 

February 28, 2011, the Department 

received a request for an NSR from Long 

Mountain. In its request for review, 

Long Mountain identified itself as both 

exporter and producer of the subject 

merchandise. The Department 

determined that Long Mountain’s 

request contained certain deficiencies 

and requested that it correct its 

submission. See March 15, 2011 letter 

from Robert James, Program Manager, to 

Long Mountain. In accordance with the 

Department’s requests, Long Mountain 

corrected the problems in its initial 

submission in a revised submission 

dated March 18, 2011. For the purpose 

of initiating this NSR, the Department 

determines that Long Mountain’s 

request for an NSR was timely filed. 

Pursuant to the requirements set forth 

in section 751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Act and 

19 CFR 351.214(b)(2), Long Mountain 

certified that (1) It did not export subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the period of investigation (POI) (see 

section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the Act and 

19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(i)); (2) since the 

initiation of the investigation it has 

never been affiliated with any company 

that exported subject merchandise to the 

United States during the POI, including 

those companies not individually 

examined during the investigation (see 

section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the Act 

and19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A)); and (3) 

its export activities were not controlled 

by the central government of the PRC 

(see 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B)). 

Additionally, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iv), Long Mountain 

submitted documentation establishing 

the following: (1) The date on which it 

first shipped subject merchandise to the 

United States; (2) the volume of its first 

shipment; and (3) the date of its first 

sale to an unaffiliated customers in the 

United States. In accordance with 19 

CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iv)(B), Long 

Mountain also provided the volume of 

its one subsequent shipment, dated 

January 30, 2011, which the company 

indicated was in transit to the United 

States. 

Initiation of Review 

Based on information on the record, 

and in accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.214(d), we find the request Long 

Mountain submitted meets the statutory 

and regulatory requirements for 

initiation of an NSR. See Memorandum 

to the File through Richard Weible, 

‘‘Initiation of AD New Shipper Review: 

Certain Preserved Mushrooms from the 

People’s Republic of China (A–570– 

851),’’ dated March 31, 2011. 

Accordingly, we are initiating an NSR of 

the antidumping duty order on certain 

preserved mushrooms from the PRC 

produced and exported by Long 

Mountain. This review covers the 

period February 1, 2010, through 

January 31, 2011. We intend to issue the 

preliminary results of this review no 

later than 180 days after the date on 

which this review is initiated, and the 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 62 / Thursday, March 31, 2011 / Notices 17837 

final results within 90 days after the 

date on which we issue the preliminary 

results. See section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(h)(i). 

In cases involving non-market 

economies, the Department requires that 

a company seeking to establish 

eligibility for an antidumping duty rate 

separate from the country-wide rate 

provide evidence of de jure and de facto 

absence of government control over the 

company’s export activities. See, 

generally, Wooden Bedroom Furniture 

from the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty New Shipper Reviews, 75 FR 72794 

(November 26, 2010), unchanged in 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Reviews, 76 FR 9747 (February 

22, 2011). Accordingly, we will issue a 

questionnaire to Long Mountain that 

will include a separate rates section. 

This review will proceed if the response 

provides sufficient indication that Long 

Mountain is not subject to either de jure 

or de facto government control with 

respect to its shipments of preserved 

mushrooms. 

Upon initiation, we will direct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

suspend liquidation of any unliquidated 

entries of subject merchandise produced 

and exported by Long Mountain and 

will instruct the CBP to allow, at the 

option of the importer, the posting, until 

the completion of the review, of a bond 

or security in lieu of a cash deposit for 

certain entries of the subject 

merchandise produced and exported by 

Long Mountain in accordance with 

section 751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act and 

19 CFR 351.214(e). Because Long 

Mountain certified that it both produced 

and exported the subject merchandise, 

the sales of which form the basis for its 

NSR request, we will instruct CBP to 

permit the use of a bond only for entries 

of subject merchandise where Long 

Mountain acted both as producer and 

exporter. 

To assist in its analysis of the bona 

fides of Long Mountain’s sales, upon 

initiation of this NSR, the Department 

will require Long Mountain to submit 

on an ongoing basis complete 

transaction information concerning any 

sales of subject merchandise to the 

United States that were made 

subsequent to the POR. 

Interested parties requiring access to 

business proprietary information in this 

NSR should submit applications for 

disclosure under administrative 

protective order in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.305 and 351.306. 

This notice serves as a reminder that 

any party submitting factual information 

in an AD/CVD proceeding must certify 

to the accuracy and completeness of that 

information. See Section 782(b) of the 

Act. Parties are hereby reminded that 

revised certification requirements are in 

effect for company/government officials 

as well as their representatives in all 

AD/CVD investigations or proceedings 

initiated on or after March 14, 2011. See 

Certification of Factual Information to 

Import Administration During 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Interim Final Rule, 76 FR 

7491 (February 10, 2011) (Interim Final 

Rule) amending 19 CFR 351.303(g)(1) 

and (2). The formats for the revised 

certifications are provided at the end of 

the Interim Final Rule. The Department 

intends to reject factual submissions in 

investigations/proceedings initiated on 

or after March 14, 2011 if the submitting 

party does not comply with the revised 

certification requirements. 

Dated: March 24, 2011. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7619 Filed 3–30–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–552–801] 

Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Initiation of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 31, 2011. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) has determined that a 

request for a new shipper review 

(‘‘NSR’’) of the antidumping duty order 

on certain frozen fish fillets (‘‘fish 

fillets’’) from the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam (‘‘Vietnam’’), received on 

February 28, 2011, meets the statutory 

and regulatory requirements for 

initiation. The period of review (‘‘POR’’) 

for this NSR is August 1, 2010, through 

January 31, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Ricardo Martinez Rivera, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 9, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: 202–482–4532. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The notice announcing the 

antidumping duty order on fish fillets 

from Vietnam was published in the 

Federal Register on August 12, 2003. 

See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: 

Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam, 68 FR 

47909 (August 12, 2003). On February 

28, 2011, pursuant to section 

751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (‘‘Act’’), the Department 

received a properly filed NSR request 

during the semi-annual anniversary 

month of the antidumping duty order 

from Thuan An Production Trading & 

Services Co., Ltd. (‘‘Tafishco’’). Tafishco 

certified that it is both the producer and 

exporter of the subject merchandise 

upon which the request was based. 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(i), 

Tafishco certified that it did not export 

subject merchandise to the United 

States during the period of investigation 

(‘‘POI’’). In addition, pursuant to section 

751(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), Tafishco certified 

that, since the initiation of the 

investigation, it has never been affiliated 

with any Vietnamese exporter or 

producer who exported subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POI, including those respondents 

not individually examined during the 

POI. As required by 19 CFR 

351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B), Tafishco also 

certified that its export activities were 

not controlled by the central 

government of Vietnam. 

In addition to the certifications 

described above, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.214(b)(2)(iv)(A), (B) and (C), 

Tafishco submitted documentation 

establishing the following: (1) The date 

on which Tafishco first shipped subject 

merchandise for export to the United 

States; (2) the volume of its first 

shipment; and (3) the date of its first 

sale to an unaffiliated customer in the 

United States. 

The Department conducted U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

database queries in an attempt to 

confirm that Tafishco’s shipments of 

subject merchandise had entered the 

United States for consumption and that 

liquidation of such entries had been 

properly suspended for antidumping 

duties. The Department also examined 

whether the CBP data confirmed that 

such entries were made during the NSR 

POR. The information we examined was 

consistent with that provided by 

Tafishco. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES