alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50260 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MANUEL RIOJAS MUNOZ, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-93-CR-136-3

-------------------- December 3,2001 Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Manuel Riojas Munoz, Jr., federal prisoner #65177-080, hasfiled a letter disputing the applicability of the certificate-ofappealability (COA) requirement to his appeal from the denial of a petition for a writ of coram nobis. Because Munoz is appealing the denial of coram nobis relief under 28 U.S.C. § 1651, he does not need a COA in order for his appeal to proceed. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1). To the extent his letter requests a waiver of the COA requirement, his request is DENIED AS UNNECESSARY. We conclude, however, that the district court properly deniedNo. 01-50260 -2- Munoz’s petition for a writ of coram nobis given that he is still in custody for his offenses of conviction. See United States v.
Hatten , 167 F.3d 884, 887 n.6 (5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, we dispense with any further briefing and DISMISS his appeal as FRIVOLOUS. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

May 13, 2013

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

No. 12-1439

ROYCE BROWN, 

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

JOHN F. CARAWAY, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United 

States District Court for the 

Southern District of Indiana, 

Terre Haute Division.

No. 2:12-cv-28-WTL-WGH

William T. Lawrence, Judge.

Order

The opinion of this court issued on May 10, 2013, is amended as follows:

Page 32, line 13, “Begay and Engel” should be “Bousley and Engel”;

Page 32, line 25, “Begay and Engel” should be “Bousley and Engel”;

Page 32, 2nd paragraph, line 1, “Begay has a proviso” should be “Bousley has a 

proviso”; and

Page 36, 1st full paragraph, “Even if Begay were constitutional, and this were 

Brown’s first collateral attack” should be revised to begin: “Even if this were Brown’s 

first collateral attack”.
<PAGE>

                                     CONSENT

We have issued our report dated February 12, 2001, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements of Sensar Corporation included in the Annual Report of
Sensar Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000. We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration
Statements of Sensar Corporation on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-1505, effective
March 22, 1996; File No. 333-6527, effective August 2, 1996; File No. 333-29923,
effective October 3, 1997; File No. 333-49989, effective May 29, 1998; File No.
333-81253, effective June 28, 1999 and File No. 333-43320 filed on October 6,
2000) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-44784, filed December 30, 1991; File No.
33-35751, filed July 5, 1990; File No. 333-24553, filed April 4, 1997; and File
No. 333-38919 filed October 28, 1997).


                                                 /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP


Salt Lake City, Utah
March 27, 2001
432 P.2d 823

#### Leonard C. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Adolph W. PRINGLE, Defendant-Appellee,

No. 8367.

Supreme Court of New. Mexico.

Oct. 23, 1967.

*468Leonard C. Jones, pro se.

Montgomery, Federici & Andrews, Seth D. Montgomery, Santa Fe, for appellee.

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This appeal is from an order of the district court dismissing the plaintiff’s cause of action under § 21-1-1(41) (e) (1), N.M.S.A.1953.

The pertinent provisions of the statute provide:

> “(1) In any civil action or proceeding pending in any district court in this state, when it shall be made to appear to the court that the plaintiff therein * * * has failed to take any action to bring such action or proceeding to its final determination for a period of at least two [2] years after the filing of said action or proceeding * * * any party to such action or proceeding may have the same dismissed with prejudice * * by filing in such pending action or proceeding a written motion moving the dismissal thereof with prejudice.”

The record discloses the following. The complaint was filed October 23, 1963. Defendant was served with process on June 19, 1965. On July 16, 1965, appellee moved for a dismissal of the complaint on the grounds (a) that the case had not been prosecuted with diligence, (b) that the appellant had failed to comply with § 21-1-1 (5) (a), N.M.S.A.1953, requiring service of process be made with all reasonable diligence. On September 6, 1966, the appellant gave notice of hearing on appellee’s motion to dismiss under § 21-1-1(5) (a) and obtained a setting thereon by the court. The court also set for hearing appellant’s objections to certain interrogatories propounded by the appellee. The next day, September 7, 1966, appellee filed the present motion to dismiss under Rule 41 (e).

 While the procuring of a setting on the merits prevents mandatory dismissal under Rule 41(e), Beyer v. Montoya, 75 N.M. 228, 402 P.2d 960; Foster v. Schwartzman, 75 N.M. 632, 409 P.2d 267, we consider the notice of hearing of September 6, 1966 and the setting thereon to be nothing more than proceedings leading to the disposition of interlocutory matters. These were not actions as contemplated by the statute to bring the proceeding to its final determination so as to toll the statute. Briesmeister v. Medina, 76 N.M. 606, 417 P.2d 208; State ex rel. City of Las Cruces v. McManus, 75 N.M. 267, 404 P.2d 106; and Morris v. Fitzgerald, 73 N.M. 56, 385 P.2d 574.

The order should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

NOBLE and CARMODY, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 12,410

 11,167

 11,647

 10,556

 11,128

 11,321

 12,280

 13,426

 14,890

 13,690

 13,676

 15,191

 15,519

 15,094

 14,330

 12,730

 11,597

 10,778

 11,308

 12,712

 12,749

 12,960

 13,776

 15,666

 16,392

 16,266

 14,799

 14,890

 13,953

 13,405

 4,557

 4,741

 5,015

 4,566

 4,713

 4,532

 4,378

 5,243

 5,083

 4,742

 4,378

 3,891

 3,614

 3,746

 3,191

 3,101

 3,501

 3,102

 3,693

 4,868

 5,138

 4,150

 4,130

 4,457

 4,899

 5,554

 3,677

 3,851

 4,503

 4,509

 8,244

 7,885

 7,798

 7,487

 7,401

 7,445

 7,589

 8,365

 8,917

 8,052

 8,557

 8,951

 9,107

 9,194

 8,946

 8,496

 7,623

 6,833

 7,366

 8,509

 8,637

 8,260

 8,362

 9,345

 10,112

 9,802

 8,567

 8,562

 8,676

 8,712

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 11, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
APPENDICES

DRAFT EIS – LOST CREEK IN SITU URANIUM PROJECT 

April 2012

List of Appendices 

Appendix A Wilderness Characteristics 

Appendix B PIAA/DDCT Analysis and WGFD Review 

Appendix C Viewshed Analysis 

Appendix D Air Quality Calculations 

Appendix E BLM Visual Contrast Rating Worksheet – October 2011
### §569. Donations to United States of lands for timber purposes

To enable owners of lands chiefly valuable for the growing of timber crops to donate or devise such lands to the United States in order to assure future timber supplies for the agricultural and other industries of the State or for other national forest purposes, the Secretary of Agriculture is authorized, in his discretion, to accept on behalf of the United States title to any such land so donated or devised, subject to such reservations by the donor of the present stand of merchantable timber or of mineral or other rights for a period not exceeding twenty years as the Secretary of Agriculture may find to be reasonable and not detrimental to the purposes of this section, and to pay out of any moneys appropriated for the general expenses of the Forest Service the cost of recording deeds or other expenses incident to the examination and acceptance of title. Any lands to which title is so accepted shall be in units of such size or so located as to be capable of economical administration as national forests either separately or jointly with other lands acquired under this section, or jointly with an existing national forest. All lands to which title is accepted under this section shall, upon acceptance of title, become national forest lands, subject to all laws applicable to lands acquired under the Act of March 1, 1911, and amendments thereto. In the sale of timber from national forest lands acquired under this section preference shall be given to applicants who will furnish the products desired therefrom to meet the necessities of citizens of the United States engaged in agriculture in the States in which such national forest is situated. All property, rights, easements, and benefits authorized by this section to be retained by or reserved to owners of lands donated or devised to the United States shall be subject to the tax laws of the States where such lands are located.

(June 7, 1924, ch. 348, §7, 43 Stat. 654.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of March 1, 1911, referred to in text, is act Mar. 1, 1911, ch. 186, 36 Stat. 961, popularly known as the Weeks Law, which enacted former sections 513 and 514 and sections 515 to 519, 521, 552, and 563 of this title and amended sections 480 and 500 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 552 of this title and Tables.
|   | 1.     | The Company’s amendment no. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended April 28, 2013 (as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                                                |

| By:     |   | /s/  Paulo Basilio |
|--------------|--------|------------------------------|
| Name:        |   | Paulo Basilio                |
| Title:  |   | Chief Financial Officer      |
©2013 DJI Innovations. All Rights Reserved. 1 | 

Battery & Charger Instruction V1.0 Thank you for purchasing our product. Please read the entire instruction strictly to use you product. Instruction 

*If the charger is in Max Output Power condition, the charge current will be decided by 20W. For example, when 2A or 3A is selected for the 3S battery, the charge current is only 20w/11v=1.8A actually. 

 Battery: LiPo(2200MAH - 20C-11.1V)  Charger 

 AC Input: 100-240V  Charge Current: 1A/2A/3A Selectable  Current Drain for Balancing: 200mA  Output Power: MAX 20W  LED Indicator 

Charge Status LED 

 The charger is ready to Charge. 

The charger is charging in CC Mode. 

 The charger is charging in CV Mode. 

The charging process finishes. 

Cell LED

 The Cell is charging. 

The Cell is balancing. 

Battery Charging Procedure 

1. Connect the red and black plugs of the charger cable to the charge 

socket. Make sure the red plug to the red charge socket, and the black plug to the black charge socket. 

2. Insert the AC power cord into the charger and AC cord into a wall 

socket (100-240V). The charge status LED will flash green. 

3. Select the battery type switch to LiPo and the current switch to 2A.4. Connect the battery connector to the XT60 connector of charger 

cable, and the battery balance wire to the 3S balance socket. 

5. Start charging. The 1S/2S/3S cell LED will glow constant red. 

When the charge status LED glows constant red, it is charging in CC (Constant Current) mode. When the charge status LED blinks green & red alternately is in CV (Constant Voltage) mode. 

6. When the cell LED is flashing, the cell is balancing. 7. When the battery is fully charged, the charge status LED will glow 

constant green. 

8. Please disconnect the battery and the charger. 

XT60 Connector

Balance Wire

B Connector attery

 Make sure to use the battery after fully charging.  When the charger is in the CV mode, the battery is over 80% charged.  Please use the battery according to the attached sticker.  DOT NOT connect the battery to the charger cable before connecting the charge cable to the charge socket, 

in order to avoid short circuit. 

©2013 大疆创新 版权所有 2| 电池&充电器 使用说任何用户在使用本产品之前,请仔细阅读本说明简介

*若达到最大功率,则充电电流的大小由功率决定选择2A或3A充电,充电电流仅为20w/11v=1.8A

电池充电步骤

1. 将充电线插入充电接口(注意充电线的插头

颜色对应,切勿插反!)。

2. 将 AC 连接线插入充电器中,另一端连接

(100~240V),等待充电状态灯绿灯闪烁方可

3. 选择电池类型为 LiPo,并且拨动开关选择充4. 电池插头连接充电线的 XT60 插头,并将平衡

平衡接口。

5. 开始充电,单元状态灯(1S/2S/3S)红灯常亮

电状态灯红灯常亮表示充电器处于 CC 模式状态灯绿红交替闪烁时表示充电器处于 CV 

6. 当单元状态灯(1S/2S/3S)开始闪烁时,表示

电压平衡。

7. 等待充电状态灯变成绿灯常亮,表示充电完

8. 充电完成,请断开电池与充电器的连接。 请确保电池充电完成之后再使用电池,否则 充电器处于 CV 模式时(充电状态灯绿红交替

 请根据电池贴纸的提示正确使用电池。 请务必在充电线插入充电接口后再连接充电
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 501

 497

 499

 513

 518

 495

 488

 482

 490

 482

 460

 465

 467

 487

 502

 508

 505

 526

 525

 556

 561

 553

 521

 478

 504

 585

 617

 688

 684

 657

 658

 334

 344

 352

 355

 378

 365

 375

 372

 385

 385

 385

 385

 382

 379

 382

 383

 383

 384

 384

 386

 395

 395

 413

 402

 410

 434

 461

 497

 508

 497

 493

 383

 396

 401

 415

 420

 410

 413

 411

 427

 429

 415

 412

 412

 420

 422

 420

 420

 426

 423

 440

 439

 459

 458

 435

 449

 509

 559

 582

 576

 570

 568

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:June 5, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 253

 261

 264

 272

 276

 269

 271

 270

 280

 281

 272

 271

 271

 276

 277

 276

 276

 279

 277

 288

 287

 300

 299

 285

 293

 331

 361

 376

 372

 368

 367

TOTAL 13,919

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 601

 618

 687

 693

 706

 687

 613

 614

 635

 644

 621

 583

 523

 528

 531

 574

 577

 485

 478

 448

 481

 491

 514

 510

 503

 510

 520

 518

 510

 496

 459

 564

 591

 616

 629

 656

 607

 602

 596

 618

 604

 555

 517

 507

 507

 507

 529

 492

 464

 433

 430

 431

 459

 485

 481

 495

 490

 485

 482

 480

 462

 420

 575

 608

 648

 673

 682

 649

 607

 605

 626

 629

 580

 555

 515

 521

 518

 556

 537

 475

 463

 438

 468

 473

 499

 494

 499

 500

 500

 491

 494

 482

 440

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 22, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 371

 392

 416

 432

 437

 417

 391

 390

 403

 405

 374

 359

 334

 338

 336

 360

 348

 310

 302

 287

 305

 308

 324

 321

 324

 325

 325

 319

 321

 314

 288

TOTAL 16,800

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 21
1

Schaeffer, John

From: Lin, Chuantung

Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 11:00 AM

To: Schaeffer, John; Brooks, David; Boethling, Bob

Cc: Townsend, Mark; Mattheisen, Mike; Lewis, Paul; Williamson, Tracy; Christian, Myrta

Subject: RE: Copy of Final TSCA Section 4 Test Rule Submission - Ethanedioic Acid [CAS RN 

144-62-7] (HPV 2)

Hi John, 

I have reviewed the attached files of tested results of physical chemical (P/C) properties endpoints (i.e., M.P., B.P., VP, 

and Water Solubility) for the HPV Orphan chemical, Ethanedioic acid (CASRN: 144-62-7). The tested results for these 

four P/C endpoints were all based on the dihydrate form of ethanedioic acid (i.e., CASRN:6153-56-6)). The tested results 

and test methods are considered adequate for all four P/C endpoints. As long as the sponsor has clearly indicated in 

their test plan and test results that the dihydrate form of oxalic acid (CASRN: 6153-56-6) was used in the test protocols 

instead of using the pure anhydrate oxalic acid (CASRN: 144-62-7), these test results of these four P/C data endpoints 

are acceptable to fulfill the data requirements under the HPV 2 Test Rule. 

Please let me know if you have any question regarding this matter. 

Thanks! 

Daniel 

From: Schaeffer, John 

Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 11:58 AM 

To: Brooks, David; Lin, Chuantung; Boethling, Bob 

Cc: Townsend, Mark; Mattheisen, Mike; Lewis, Paul 

Subject: FW: Copy of Final TSCA Section 4 Test Rule Submission - Ethanedioic Acid [CAS RN 144-62-7] (HPV 2) 

Dave, Please review the ecological and health effects studies attached in this email – (fish, daphnia, algae, chromosome 

abs) 

Bob, for your review there is also attached a biodegradation study 

Daniel, please review the p-chem properties for adequacy (MP, BP, VP, WS) 

Would also appreciate each of you giving me the expected date of completion of your review by COB this Wednesday. 

If the attachments don’t make it through our new email system please let me know and I will send them separately. 

Thank you all! 

John 

From: John V. Massingale [mailto:john@grcci.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 12:09 PM 

To: Schaeffer, John 

Subject: Copy of Final TSCA Section 4 Test Rule Submission - Ethanedioic Acid [CAS RN 144-62-7] (HPV 2) 
2

***This E-mail Contains No CBI*** 

John, 

On behalf of the Oxalic Acid Testing Consortium, I have today sent to the EPA’s OPPT Docket, by UPS overnight 

delivery, the final test reports on the HPV 2 chemical, ethanedioic acid [CAS RN 144-62-7]. As you have requested, I also 

include here for your files, copies of these same test reports along with the cover letter that accompanied the submission. 

Also, as discussed in the cover letter, I am still trying to register with the HPVIS so as to get the robust summaries 

submitted. 

If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to let me know. 

Thank you, 

John 

_______________________________ 

 

John V. Massingale 

Greenwich Chemical Consulting, Inc. 

3300 PGA Boulevard, Suite 635 

Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 

T 561.578.8110 

F 561.578.8120 

E john@grcci.com

www.grcci.com
!!"

#
$
%"&&'%(


)*+,
-%
%./%+)**

	01-.232+)4*5

065*343**

7&	165*343+*

&%8
-1%0	1

	


	

	

	
	






	
	





	

6

9!:!:!:!;:.<

=%
 <&+)4++5347>

			




01&%%
	&1=$
%0</
%?/+5.2*+).%0%$>,&
&%&

	&% %0@&
A. =,	/. $
%
, $& 
-
	#
%B%0&=#4	&%-

	0&%
++	&%&	&/-
	0&%
$%0&

/%	,<-
-1B%0	0&%
++

	& <7 22.%0@%A &- %0&
 $-(%0%0</
%.%0&
B/1%$

	/.%0	%$=%
9=&#
1%&/%.	%0@=%
A.%0	%

$%0:$$	$%0;
/%.&-=	&/%%0
(&&
C/%&-

%-.%0

</
%0
=,9 %0%&- < "?;<&%

=%
D
$B&	&/-
	0&%
&-	0&%
++$
&
-$+21%00&/%1&%	

%&,0
=,$%-$$	%#&$%0-&%$%
,0
$ <!:

&%-6EEEEEEEEEEEEE

EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

 
&7>,

;%-%&%&

/%	,</
%?/-B

	



Jun 20 2019

/s/ Brian F. Kenney

Entered on Docket: June 21, 2019

Case 19-11583-BFK Doc 77 Filed 06/21/19 Entered 06/21/19 10:13:50 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
>7: 6

    

	



 !!"

#
$
%"&&'%(


)*+,
-%
%./%+)**

	01-.232+)4*5

&%8
-1%0	1

065*343**

&-

?&	=&&01
.


"<::!!"

2<11
	&%
%

"
%&-.*+*+

C1&01
8
	&%(-	1

062*)+4++**




	

	

  
   

&"
3+23

< ;9F"."<

+50%%
#/./%2**

	!&.22+*+

*33435**

 	

96

  GG?&	
7
&
(G
1

?&	
7
&


:$$	$%0;
/%.B

+2/
%
%./%*

H&-
&.223+





	
%$,%0&%%0:
-
0&=-
-=,&	&
,&
%

    

	



424

Case 19-11583-BFK Doc 77 Filed 06/21/19 Entered 06/21/19 10:13:50 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3



	

	

434

Case 19-11583-BFK Doc 77 Filed 06/21/19 Entered 06/21/19 10:13:50 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3628 — Gilde/Bekaert Fencing)

(2005/C 101/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 16 February 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Ex12

                                  IDACORP, Inc.
                       Consolidated Financial Information
                       Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


                                            Twelve Months Ended December 31,
                                                 (Thousands of Dollars)
                                           1995         1996         1997         1998        1999
<S>                                     <C>         <C>          <C>           <C>         <C>
Earnings, as defined:
  Income before  income taxes           $ 127,342   $  135,247   $  133,570    $ 133,806   $ 137,021
  Adjust for distributed income of
  equity investees                         (2,058)      (1,413)      (3,943)      (4,697)       (837)
  Equity in loss of equity method               0            0            0          458         435
  investments
  Minority interest in losses of
  majority owned subsidiaries                   0            0            0         (125)        (37)
  Fixed charges, as below                  70,215       70,418       69,634       69,923      72,243

     Total earnings, as defined         $ 195,499   $  204,252   $  199,261    $ 199,365   $ 208,825

Fixed charges, as defined:
  Interest charges                      $  56,456   $   57,348   $   60,761    $  60,677   $  62,975
  Preferred stock dividends of
  subsidiaries-
     gross up-IDACORP rate                 12,834       12,079        7,891        8,445       8,313
  Rental interest factor                      925          991          982          801         955

     Total fixed charges, as defined    $  70,215   $   70,418   $   69,634    $  69,923   $  72,243

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges          2.78x        2.90x        2.86x        2.85x       2.89x

</TABLE>
### §2261B. Enhanced penalty for stalkers of children

(a) In General.—Except as provided in subsection (b), if the victim of an offense under section 2261A is under the age of 18 years, the maximum imprisonment for the offense is 5 years greater than the maximum term of imprisonment otherwise provided for that offense in section 2261.

(b) Limitation.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to a person who violates section 2261A if—

(1) the person is subject to a sentence under section 2261(b)(5); and

(2)(A) the person is under the age of 18 at the time the offense occurred; or

(B) the victim of the offense is not less than 15 nor more than 17 years of age and not more than 3 years younger than the person who committed the offense at the time the offense occurred.

(Added Pub. L. 116–249, §2(a), Dec. 22, 2020, 134 Stat. 1126.)