alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Reporting Period


    Exhibit
      10.1

    
 

    FOURTH
      AMENDMENT

    TO

    REVOLVING
      NOTE

    


    THIS
      FOURTH AMENDMENT (this “Fourth
      Amendment”)
      is
      made to that certain Revolving Note dated as of May 29, 2003 (the “Note”)
      in
      favor of MARK A. EMALFARB TRUST U/A/D dated October 1, 1987 (the “Lender”)
      by a
      wholly-owned subsidiary of DYADIC INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation
      (the “Borrower”),
      Dyadic International (USA), Inc., a Florida corporation (formerly known as
      Dyadic International, Inc.) (the “Borrower’s
      Predecessor”)
      and
      assumed by the Borrower pursuant to an Assumption Agreement dated October 29,
      2004 by and between the Borrower and the Lender.

    


    RECITALS:

    


    A. The
      Note
      is secured pursuant to the terms of a Security Agreement dated as of May 29,
      2003. 

    


    B. Capitalized
      terms not expressly defined herein shall have the meaning assigned those terms
      in the Note, as amended by First Amendment dated February 13, 2004 and Second
      Amendment dated August 19, 2004.

    


    C. Lender
      owns and holds the Note.

    


    D. Borrower
      has requested that Lender extend the scheduled Maturity Date under the Note
      until January 1, 2009.

    


    AMENDMENT
      TO NOTE:

    


    NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals and for other good and
      valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
      expressly acknowledged by Lender, Borrower and Lender hereby agree as
      follows:

    


    1. Incorporation
      of Recitals.
      The
      foregoing Recitals are incorporated herein and by this reference made a part
      hereof, and this Fourth Amendment shall be construed in accordance
      therewith.

    


    2. Amendment
      of Maturity Date.
      The
      Note shall be amended by deleting all references contained therein to the phrase
      “January 1, 2008” and substituting therefore the phrase “January 1,
      2009”.

    


    3. Attachment;
      Continued Effectiveness of Note.
      This
      Fourth Amendment is attached to and forms an integral part of the Note. All
      of
      the provisions of the Note, as amended by this Fourth Amendment, shall remain
      in
      full force and effect.

    


    4. Effective
      Date.
      This
      Fourth Amendment shall be effective as of March 21, 2007.

    


    5. Counterparts.
      This
      Fourth Amendment may be signed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall
      be
      deemed to be an original and all of which, taken together, shall constitute
      one
      and the same instrument.

    


    DYADIC
      INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware

    corporation

    


    


    


    Accepted:

    


    MARK
      A.
      EMALFARB TRUST U/A/D October 1, 1987

    


    


    


    By:
      /s/
      Mark A. Emalfarb__________

    Mark
      A.
      Emalfarb, Trustee
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Vincent Y. Yan, certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this Form 10-K of Lotus Pacific, Inc.

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)     designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)    evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)     disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)     allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)    anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
|   | Date: April 15, 2004                          |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | */s/**YAN,  Vincent Yong*                          |   |
|   | YAN, Vincent Yong                                  |
|   |  President, Chief Executive Officer, Director |

 

----
### §4242. Determination of the existence of insanity at the time of the offense

(a) Motion for Pretrial Psychiatric or Psychological Examination.—Upon the filing of a notice, as provided in Rule 12.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, that the defendant intends to rely on the defense of insanity, the court, upon motion of the attorney for the Government, shall order that a psychiatric or psychological examination of the defendant be conducted, and that a psychiatric or psychological report be filed with the court, pursuant to the provisions of section 4247(b) and (c).

(b) Special Verdict.—If the issue of insanity is raised by notice as provided in Rule 12.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on motion of the defendant or of the attorney for the Government, or on the court's own motion, the jury shall be instructed to find, or, in the event of a nonjury trial, the court shall find the defendant—

(1) guilty;

(2) not guilty; or

(3) not guilty only by reason of insanity.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 855; Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §403(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2059.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §877 (May 13, 1930, ch. 254, §7, 46 Stat. 272).

Minor change was made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–473 amended section generally, substituting "Determination of the existence of insanity at the time of the offense" for "Retransfer upon recovery" in section catchline, and substituting provisions relating to motion for pretrial psychiatric or psychological examination, and special verdict, for provisions relating to retransfer to a penal or correctional institution upon recovery of an inmate of the United States hospital for defective delinquents.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 616

 631

 637

 627

 602

 611

 610

 621

 607

 609

 618

 614

 613

 616

 634

 637

 683

 677

 706

 682

 635

 616

 574

 575

 564

 540

 550

 536

 506

 507

 507

 569

 578

 568

 563

 576

 584

 583

 586

 580

 578

 578

 570

 580

 566

 575

 561

 579

 575

 571

 572

 555

 534

 533

 535

 533

 530

 509

 479

 478

 483

 475

 595

 601

 595

 594

 589

 598

 598

 599

 592

 590

 594

 592

 597

 593

 596

 590

 616

 613

 632

 611

 585

 567

 556

 557

 546

 535

 533

 508

 494

 497

 488

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 3, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 384

 387

 384

 383

 380

 386

 386

 386

 382

 381

 383

 382

 385

 382

 384

 381

 397

 395

 407

 394

 378

 366

 360

 360

 353

 347

 345

 330

 321

 323

 318

TOTAL 17,851

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
#### § 300.198 Continuation of a by-pass.

The Secretary continues a by-pass until the Secretary determines that the SEA, LEA or other public agency will meet the requirements for providing services to private school children.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(f)(2)(C))
(No. 74-CC-318

#### Funk Seeds International, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 20, 1974.*

Funk Seeds International, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §1074. Flight to avoid prosecution for damaging or destroying any building or other real or personal property

(a) Whoever moves or travels in interstate or foreign commerce with intent either (1) to avoid prosecution, or custody, or confinement after conviction, under the laws of the place from which he flees, for willfully attempting to or damaging or destroying by fire or explosive any building, structure, facility, vehicle, dwelling house, synagogue, church, religious center or educational institution, public or private, or (2) to avoid giving testimony in any criminal proceeding relating to any such offense shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(b) Violations of this section may be prosecuted in the Federal judicial district in which the original crime was alleged to have been committed or in which the person was held in custody or confinement: Provided, however, That this section shall not be construed as indicating an intent on the part of Congress to prevent any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession of the United States of any jurisdiction over any offense over which they would have jurisdiction in the absence of such section.

(Added Pub. L. 86–449, title II, §201, May 6, 1960, 74 Stat. 86; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000".
§ 370.43 What requirement applies to the use of mediation procedures? ( a ) Each designated agency shall implement procedures designed to ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, good faith negotiations and mediation procedures are used before resorting to formal administrative or legal remedies. In designing these procedures, the designated agency may take into account its level of resources.
( b ) For purposes of this section, mediation may involve the use of professional mediators, other independent third parties mutually agreed to by the parties to the dispute, or an employee of the designated agency who— ( 1 ) Is not assigned to advocate for or otherwise represent or is not involved with advocating for or otherwise representing the client or client-applicant who is a party to the mediation; and
( 2 ) Has not previously advocated for or otherwise represented or been involved with advocating for or otherwise representing that same client or client-applicant.
(Authority: Section 112(g)(3) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 732(g)(3))
#### Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, Appellant and Respondent, v. 960 Fifth Avenue Corporation, Respondent and Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, and Dore, JJ.
Final 

Overland Pass Natural Gas Liquids Pipeline 

Environmental Impact Statement 

Volume II 

Wyoming State Office - Rawlins Field Office 

Bureau of Land Management

Cooperating Agency: U.S.D.A. Forest Service 

August 2007
MISSION STATEMENT 

It is the mission of the Bureau of Land Management to sustain the health, diversity, 

and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future 

generations. 

BLM/WY/PL-07/026+5101 

AS-06-01095 
APPENDICES 
Contents 

VOLUME II 

Appendix A – Mitigation Measures 

Appendix B – Site-specific Maps for Aboveground Facilities 

Appendix C – Construction, Reclamation, and Revegetation Plan 

Appendix D – Hydrostatic Test Plan 

Appendix E – Weed Management Plan 

Appendix F – Winter Construction Plan 

Appendix G – Comparison of Route Alternatives 

Appendix H – Waterbody and Wetland Crossing Tables 

Appendix I – Special Status Species Tables 

Appendix J – BLM Cultural Resources Protection Procedures 

Appendix K – Cultural Resources Site Summary Tables by State 

Appendix L – Risk Assessment 

Appendix M – Distribution List for the Final EIS 

i
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Reflect Scientific, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly
Report"), we, Kim Boyce, President and director, and Kevin Cooksy,
Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

Dated: 5/9/06                            /s/Kim Boyce
       ------                            ---------------------------
                                         Kim Boyce
                                         President and Director

Dated: 5/9/06                            /s/Kevin Cooksy
      -------                            ---------------------------
                                         Kevin Cooksy
                                         Secretary/Treasurer
Exhibit 31.2
                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Kevin Cooksy, Secretary/Treasurer of Reflect Scientific, Inc. (the
"small business issuer"), certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report (the "Quarterly Report") on
Form 10-QSB of the small business issuer;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this Quarterly Report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in
this Quarterly Report;

     4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small
business issuer and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the small business issuer,
          including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by
          others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
          disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior
          to the filing date of this Quarterly Report (the "Evaluation Date");
          and

     c)   presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the small business issuer's
          ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
          have identified for the small business issuers auditors any material
          weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
          other employees who have a significant role in the small business
          issuer's internal controls; and

Dated: 08/10/05                      Signature:/s/Kevin Cooksy
                                     Kevin Cooksy
                                     Secretary/Treasurer
§ 363.52 What are the information collection and reporting requirements? Each State agency designated in § 363.11(a) must collect and report separately the information required under 34 CFR 361.40 for— ( a ) Eligible individuals receiving supported employment services under this part;
( b ) Eligible individuals receiving supported employment services under 34 CFR part 361;
( c ) Eligible youth receiving supported employment services and extended services under this part; and
( d ) Eligible youth receiving supported employment services under 34 CFR part 361 and extended services.
(Authority: Sections 13 and 607 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 710 and 795l)
(No. 74-CC-688

#### National College of Education, An Illinois Not-For-Profit Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 26, 1974.*

Price, Cushman, Keck, Mahin & Cate, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### § 110.13 Exceptions to the rules against age discrimination: Reasonable factors other than age.

A recipient is permitted to take an action otherwise prohibited by § 110.10 that is based on a factor other than age, even though that action may have a disproportionate effect on persons of different ages. An action may be based on a factor other than age only if the factor bears a direct and substantial relationship to the normal operation of the program or activity or to the achievement of a statutory objective.

(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6103)
(No. 3025

#### Elva Jennings Penwell, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 14, 1974.*

Gosnell, Benecki and Borden, Ltd., Attorney for Claimant.

*403William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Claimant filed her Petition for reimbursement for moneys expended for nursing care and help, medical services, and expenses from January 1, 1973, to December 31, 1973, praying for an award in the sum of $5,302.96.

Claimant was seriously injured in an accident on the second day of February, 1936, while employed as a Supervisor at the Illinois Soldier’s and Sailor’s Children’s School at Normal, Illinois. The complete details of this injury can be found in the original cause of action, *Penwell*vs. *State of Illinois,*11 C.C. R. 365, in which an initial award was made, and at which time jurisdiction was retained to make successive awards in the future, and this Court has periodically made supplemental awards to claimant to cover expenses incurred by her, the last award covering the time period from January 1, 1972, to December 31, 1972.

A joint motion of claimant and respondent was filed herein requesting leave to waive the filing of briefs and arguments. In addition, claimant filed Exhibit "1”. The exhibit sets out those items upon which agreement has been had with claimant and respondent in the above cause. This motion was granted, and no further pleadings have been filed herein.

The Attorney General does not contest the veracity nor the propriety of the items and amounts set forth in claimant’s Exhibit "1”.

*404The Court, therefore, enters an award in favor of the claimant in the sum of Five Thousand, Three Hundred Two And 96/100 Dollars ($5,302.96). The matter of claimant’s need for additional care is reserved by this Court for future determination.