alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.3






TERMINATION AGREEMENT




This Termination Agreement (“Termination Agreement”) is entered into as of October 25, 2007 by
and between JD Holdings Inc., a California corporation (“JD Holdings”), and Joe’s Jeans Inc.
(formerly known as Innovo Group Inc.) a Delaware corporation (collectively, with its subsidiary
Joe’s Jeans Subsidiary Inc., “Joe’s”).



W I T N E S S E T H:




WHEREAS, Joe’s and JD Holdings, successor to JD Design LLC, previously entered into that
certain Collateral Protection Agreement dated October 13, 2006, the First Amendment dated October
30, 2006, the Second Amendment dated April 13, 2007 and the Third Amendment dated June 25, 2007;
and



WHEREAS, the parties mutually agree to terminate the Collateral Protection Agreement; and



NOW THEREFORE, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual promises, covenants and conditions set
forth herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:



1. The Collateral Protection Agreement is hereby terminated in its entirety and there are no
further obligations under the Agreement as of the date of this Termination Agreement.



2. This Termination Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall
be deemed to be an original, and all of which, taken together, shall constitute one and the same
instrument.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Termination Agreement to be executed
as of the date first set forth above.




JOE’S JEANS INC.




By: /s/ Marc Crossman

Its: CEO and President





JD HOLDINGS, INC.




By: /s/ Joseph M. Dahan

Its: President
### §3189. Place and character of hearing

Hearings in cases of extradition under treaty stipulation or convention shall be held on land, publicly, and in a room or office easily accessible to the public.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 824.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §657 (Aug. 3, 1882, ch. 378, §1, 22 Stat. 215).

First word "All" was omitted as unnecessary.
§ 31.6 Location and timing of oral hearing. ( a ) If the Secretary grants a request for an oral hearing, the Secretary selects the time, date, and location of the hearing. The Secretary selects, to the extent feasible, the location that is most convenient for the employee.
( b ) For a current military employee, the Secretary selects the time, date, and location of the hearing after consultation with the Secretary of Defense.
( c ) For a current Coast Guard employee, the Secretary selects the time, date, and location of the hearing after consultation with the Secretary of Transportation.
( d ) For an employee not described in paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, the hearing will be held in Washington, DC, or in one of the following cities: Boston, Philadelphia, New York, Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Kansas City, Denver, San Francisco, or Seattle.
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5514; 31 U.S.C. 3716)
4-30-13 Line 3 Run 2

Temperature Data

File Name: C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Documents\MDAS-PRO\Data\c1.MP_Lgr

Recorder Start Time: 3/27/2013 7:33:32 AM Eastern Daylight Time

Recorder Stop Time: 5/2/2013 9:03:32 AM Eastern Daylight Time

Measurement Interval: 30Min

Number of Measurements: 1732

Alarm Activated: False

Printout Date: 5/2/2013 9:23:16 AM Eastern Daylight Time

Logger Serial Number: 110405009

Initial Description: Alcoa Line 3

Final Comment: 

Tracking Number: 5068

Note: 

Data Format: Output All Measurements.

DateTime Temperature

4/30/2013 14:33 101.4

4/30/2013 15:03 101.6

4/30/2013 15:33 101.4

4/30/2013 16:03 104.4

4/30/2013 16:33 104.4

4/30/2013 17:03 101.4

4/30/2013 17:33 101.6

4/30/2013 18:03 101.4

4/30/2013 18:33 101.4

4/30/2013 19:03 101.8

4/30/2013 19:33 101.8

AVG 102.05
§ 303.400 General responsibility of lead agency for procedural safeguards. Subject to paragraph (c) of this section, each lead agency must— ( a ) Establish or adopt the procedural safeguards that meet the requirements of this subpart, including the provisions on confidentiality in §§ 303.401 through 303.417, parental consent and notice in §§ 303.420 and 303.421, surrogate parents in § 303.422, and dispute resolution procedures in § 303.430;
( b ) Ensure the effective implementation of the safeguards by each participating agency (including the lead agency and EIS providers) in the statewide system that is involved in the provision of early intervention services under this part; and
( c ) Make available to parents an initial copy of the child's early intervention record, at no cost to the parents.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1439(a))
#### § 200.80 [Reserved]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 1, 2014

p0924 

# Order

Clerk October 1, 2014

148645 & (17)(18)(23)(24)

PEOPLE OF THE S TATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148645

COA: 315188

Shiawassee CC: 0 1

- 007380

- FH

DONALD LEE KISSNER

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 29, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Shiawassee Circuit Court for

furth er proceedings. The circuit court failed to provide the defendant with advice

concerning his appellate rights at his original sentencing or at the sentencing following

probation violation, as required under the court rules in effect at the time of his

sen tencing, MCR 6.425(E)(2) and MCR 6.445(H)(2), respectively. Upon remand, the

court shall properly advise the defendant that he is entitled to file an application for leave

to appeal to the Court of Appeals, and/or any appropriate postconviction motions in the

trial court, pursuant to the versions of MCR 7.205(F)(3), MCR 6.311, and MCR 6.429 in

effect at the time of the defendant’s sentencing. We further note that because the

defendant’s minimum sentence exceeded the upper limit of the sentencing guideline s range, he is entitled to an attorney under MCL 770.3a(2)(b), which was in effect at the

time that the defendant was sentenced. In his application for leave to appeal or

postconviction motion, the defendant may include among the issues raised those issue s presented in his application for leave to appeal to this Court, but is not required to do so.

In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the

remaining questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court. Th e motion to join

dockets for hearing is DENIED. In light of this Court’s order, the motions for remand,

appointment of counsel, and oral arguments are DENIED as moot.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
§ 463.100 What are the purposes of the Unified and Combined State Plans? ( a ) The Unified and Combined State Plans provide the framework for States to outline a strategic vision of, and goals for, how their workforce development systems will achieve the purposes of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA).
( b ) The Unified and Combined State Plans serve as 4-year action plans to develop, align, and integrate the State's systems and provide a platform to achieve the State's vision and strategic and operational goals. A Unified or Combined State Plan is intended to: ( 1 ) Align, in strategic coordination, the six core programs required in the Unified State Plan pursuant to § 463.105(b), and additional Combined State Plan partner programs that may be part of the Combined State Plan pursuant to § 463.140;
( 2 ) Direct investments in economic, education, and workforce training programs to focus on providing relevant education and training to ensure that individuals, including youth and individuals with barriers to employment, have the skills to compete in the job market and that employers have a ready supply of skilled workers;
( 3 ) Apply strategies for job-driven training consistently across Federal programs; and
( 4 ) Enable economic, education, and workforce partners to build a skilled workforce through innovation in, and alignment of, employment, training, and education programs.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10c7

                        HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
                     EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

                   (As Established Effective January 1, 1985)


                                Sixth Amendment


                 Houston Industries Incorporated, a Texas corporation (the
"Company"), having amended and restated the Houston Industries Incorporated
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 1985 (the "Plan"),
and having reserved the right under Section 18 thereof to amend the Plan, does
hereby amend the definition of "Company"  in Section 2 of the Plan, effective
August 6, 1997, to read as follows:

                 "F.      'Company':  Houston Industries Incorporated, any
         successor thereto,  and/or any subsidiaries adopting the Plan with
         approval of the Board of Directors."

                 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused these presents to
be executed by its duly authorized officers in a number of copies, all of which
shall constitute one and the same instrument, which may be sufficiently
evidenced by any executed copy hereof, this 26th day of February, 1998, but
effective as of August 6, 1997.


                                       HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED



                                       By /s/ LEE W. HOGAN
                                         -----------------------------------
                                         Name: Lee W. Hogan
                                              ------------------------------
                                         Title: Executive Vice President
                                               -----------------------------

ATTEST:

/s/ RICHARD B. DAUPHIN
-----------------------------
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 30, 2015

a0622

Order 

Clerk

June 30, 2015

150032 & (19)(20)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150032

COA: 322104

Wayne CC: 11-004878-FC

BERRY ROBINSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 11, 2014

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motions to remand and for the appointment of counsel are DENIED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 709

 678

 713

 696

 665

 625

 584

 569

 545

 563

 554

 607

 624

 649

 657

 654

 673

 692

 670

 626

 542

 515

 556

 633

 555

 678

 702

 706

 595

 610

 732

 415

 426

 433

 438

 434

 436

 434

 435

 435

 439

 443

 442

 434

 452

 425

 428

 402

 389

 388

 391

 383

 394

 424

 426

 424

 399

 393

 382

 393

 365

 384

 511

 530

 536

 535

 538

 531

 510

 510

 493

 494

 496

 497

 514

 520

 528

 537

 518

 501

 511

 490

 448

 433

 482

 507

 469

 487

 490

 504

 480

 491

 556

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 19, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 332

 344

 347

 347

 348

 344

 331

 331

 321

 321

 323

 323

 334

 337

 342

 348

 336

 326

 332

 319

 293

 284

 314

 329

 306

 317

 319

 327

 313

 319

 360

TOTAL 15,647

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
#### § 600.1 Scope.

This part establishes the rules and procedures that the Secretary uses to determine whether an educational institution qualifies in whole or in part as an eligible institution of higher education under the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA). An eligible institution of higher education may apply to participate in programs authorized by the HEA (HEA programs).

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1088, 1094, 1099b, 1099c, and 1141)
II 

Calendar No. 532 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4734 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2020 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 171 South Maple Street in Dana, Indiana, 

as the ‘‘Ernest ‘Ernie’ T. Pyle Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ERNEST ‘‘ERNIE’’ T. PYLE POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 171 South Maple Street in Dana, 

6 Indiana, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Ernest 

7 ‘Ernie’ T. Pyle Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4734 PCS

1 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ernest ‘Ernie’ T. Pyle 

2 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 14, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS

SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 532 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4734 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office’’. Dana, Indiana, as the ‘‘Ernest ‘Ernie’ T. Pyle al Service located at 171 South Maple Street in 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2020 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
### §287. False, fictitious or fraudulent claims

Whoever makes or presents to any person or officer in the civil, military, or naval service of the United States, or to any department or agency thereof, any claim upon or against the United States, or any department or agency thereof, knowing such claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent, shall be imprisoned not more than five years and shall be subject to a fine in the amount provided in this title.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 698; Pub. L. 99–562, §7, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3169.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §80 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §35, 35 Stat. 1095; Oct. 23, 1918, ch. 194, 40 Stat. 1015; June 18, 1934, ch. 587, 48 Stat. 996; Apr. 4, 1938, ch. 69, 52 Stat. 197).

Section 80 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was divided into two parts. That portion making it a crime to present false claims was retained as this section. The part relating to false statements is now section 1001 of this title.

To clarify meaning of "department" words "agency" and "or agency" were inserted after it. (See definitions of "department" and "agency" in section 6 of this title.)

Words "or any corporation in which the United States of America is a stockholder" which appeared in two places were omitted as unnecessary in view of definition of "agency" in section 6 of this title.

The words "five years" were substituted for "ten years" to harmonize the punishment provisions of comparable sections involving offenses of the gravity of felonies, but not of such heinous character as to warrant a 10-year punishment. (See sections 914, 1001, 1002, 1005, 1006 of this title.)

Reference to persons causing or procuring was omitted as unnecessary in view of definition of "principal" in section 2 of this title.

Minor changes in phraseology were made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1986—Pub. L. 99–562 substituted "imprisoned not more than five years and shall be subject to a fine in the amount provided in this title" for "fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Increased Penalties for False Claims in Defense Procurement

Pub. L. 99–145, title IX, §931(a), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 699, provided that: "Notwithstanding sections 287 and 3623 of title 18, United States Code, the maximum fine that may be imposed under such section for making or presenting any claim upon or against the United States related to a contract with the Department of Defense, knowing such claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent, is $1,000,000."

[Pub. L. 99–145, title IX, §931(c), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 699, provided that section 931(a) is applicable to claims made or presented on or after Nov. 8, 1985.]
Accumulated Precipitation for Water Year To Date in Inches

Reservoir Current WY 

2023

WY 1977 WY 1983 Average

(N Years)

% of

Average

Last

24 Hours

Trinity at Fish Hatchery 39.53 24.94 40.84 30.92 ( 63) 128 0.05

Sacramento at Shasta Dam 76.13 40.12 87.75 60.03 ( 68) 127 0.05

American at Blue Canyon 77.92 5.20 117.58 65.20 ( 49) 120 0.00

Stanislaus at New Melones 47.61 --- 38.94 27.10 ( 46) 176 0.00

San Joaquin at Huntington Lk 67.32 16.20 73.10 41.02 ( 50) 164 0.27

Accumulated Inflow for Water Year to Date in Thousands of Acre-Feet

Reservoir Current WY 2023 WY 1977 WY 1983 15 Yr Avg % of 15 Yr Avg

Trinity 1,539 695 1,993 1,053 146

Shasta 5,619 3,613 9,012 4,761 118

Folsom 4,724 1,142 6,113 2,658 178

New Melones 2,342 --- 2,165 1,085 216

Millerton 4,258 828 3,142 1,725 247

Reservoir Releases in Cubic Feet/Second

Reservoir Dam WY 2022 WY 2023 15 Yr Median

Trinity Lewiston 455 449 455

Sacramento Keswick 4,105 6,395 6,870

Feather Oroville(SWP) 2,500 7,500 4,000

American Nimbus 1,806 2,983 1,759

Stanislaus Goodwin 151 302 205

San Joaquin Friant 240 385 351

Storage in Major Reservoirs in Thousands of Acre-Feet

Reservoir Capacity 15 Yr Avg WY 2022 WY 2023 % of 15 Yr Avg

Trinity 2,448 1,273 553 1,275 100

Shasta 4,552 2,389 1,515 3,332 139

Folsom 977 462 345 667 145

New Melones 2,420 1,269 619 1,896 149

Fed. San Luis 966 339 245 788 232

Total North CVP 11,363 5,731 3,277 7,958 139

Millerton 521 281 343 212 75

Oroville (SWP) 3,538 1,645 1,230 2,596 158

Historical Archive and Report Database

Daily CVP Water Supply

Run Date: 4/2/2024

September 30, 2023
Exhibit32.3

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the AnnualReport of Idaho Power Company (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2007, (the "Report"), I, J. LaMont Keen, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:

(1)              The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| */s/J. LaMont Keen*                   |
|---------------------------------------|
| J. LaMont Keen                        |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| February 28, 2008                     |
|                                       |

----
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5104 

To ensure full labor protections for graduate student workers, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2019 

Mr. POCAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To ensure full labor protections for graduate student 

workers, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Respect Graduate Stu5 dent Workers Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

7 It is the sense of Congress that, pursuant to the defi8 nition of ‘‘employee’’ in the National Labor Relations Act 

9 (29 U.S.C. 152), graduate student workers at colleges and 

10 universities are employees and should be granted every 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5104 IH

1 right and responsibility conferred to them under such Act, 

2 and graduate student workers should not be excluded from 

3 the definition of ‘‘employee’’ on the basis of an educational 

4 relationship with an employer. 

5 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN RULEMAKING. 

6 The National Labor Relations Board may not finalize 

7 the proposed rule entitled ‘‘Jurisdiction-Nonemployee Sta8 tus of University and College Students Working in Con9 nection With Their Studies’’, published September 23, 

10 2019 (84 Fed. Reg. 49691), or make any similar rule. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
----

| **Exhibit 12.1**                                              |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| **IDACORP, Inc.**                                             |
| **Consolidated Financial Information**                        |
| **Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**                        |
| ** **                                                    |
| ** **                                                    | **Twelve Months Ended** |
| ** **                                                    | **December 31,** |
| ** **                                                    | **(Thousands of Dollars)** |
| ** **                                                    |
| ** **                                                    | **2007** | **2006** | **2005** | **2004** | **2003** |
|                                                               |  |  |  |  |  |
| Earnings, as defined:                                         |  |  |  |  |  |
|                                                               |  |  |  |  |  |
| Income  from continuing operations before income taxes        |  $ | 96,003  |  $ | 115,452  |  $ | 103,326  |  $ | 60,830  |  $ | 31,063  |
| Adjust  for distributed income of equity investees            | 6,064  | (9,347) | (10,370) | 1,990  | (2,136) |
| Equity  in loss of equity method investments                  | -  | -  | -  | -   | -  |
| Minority  interest in losses of majority owned                |  |  |  |  |  |
| subsidiaries                                                  | -  | -  | -  | (48) | (435) |
| Fixed  charges, as below                                      | 72,879  | 65,745  | 64,379  | 66,137  | 68,134  |
| Total  earnings, as defined                                   |  $ | 174,946  |  $ | 171,850  |  $ | 157,335  |  $ | 128,909  |  $ | 96,626  |
|                                                               |  |  |  |  |  |
| Fixed charges, as defined:                                    |  |  |  |  |  |
|                                                               |  |  |  |  |  |
| Interest  charges1                                            |  $ | 71,946  |  $ | 64,720  |  $ | 62,962  |  $ | 61,269  |  $ | 64,813  |
| Preferred  stock dividends of  subsidiaries - gross up - |  |  |  |  |  |
| IDACORP  rate                                                 | -  | -  | -  | 3,216  | 1,915  |
| Rental  interest factor                                       | 933  | 1,025  | 1,417  | 1,652  | 1,406  |
| Total  fixed charges, as defined                              |  $ | 72,879  |  $ | 65,745  |  $ | 64,379  |  $ | 66,137  |  $ | 68,134  |
|                                                               |  |  |  |  |  |
| Ratio of earnings to fixed  charges                           | 2.40 x | 2.61 x | 2.44 x | 1.95 x | 1.42 x |
|                                                               |  |  |  |  |    |
| 1 FIN 48 interest is not included in interest charges.        |  |  |  |  |  |

----