alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 1,033

 1,007

 981

 857

 705

 750

 780

 880

 857

 796

 882

 973

 968

 986

 971

 837

 830

 840

 776

 793

 822

 803

 798

 839

 922

 969

 972

 950

 969

 963

 850

 684

 656

 702

 709

 725

 701

 674

 607

 557

 541

 504

 514

 482

 479

 501

 494

 496

 519

 521

 453

 469

 470

 505

 518

 543

 1,001

 989

 942

 770

 687

 730

 736

 787

 785

 738

 740

 731

 713

 697

 720

 624

 648

 634

 606

 630

 668

 626

 596

 664

 718

 651

 720

 723

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 3, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 635

 627

 598

 492

 441

 467

 471

 502

 501

 472

 473

 468

 457

 447

 461

 402

 416

 408

 391

 405

 429

 403

 384

 426

 460

 418

 461

 463

TOTAL 20,274

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
### §791a. Short title

This chapter may be cited as the "Federal Power Act".

(June 10, 1920, ch. 285, pt. III, §321, formerly §320, as added Aug. 26, 1935, ch. 687, title II, §213, 49 Stat. 863; renumbered Pub. L. 95–617, title II, §212, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3148.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of part III of the Federal Power Act, and not as part of part I of that Act which comprises this subchapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 2013 Amendment

Pub. L. 113–23, §1(a), Aug. 9, 2013, 127 Stat. 493, provided that: "This Act [amending sections 798, 823a, and 2705 of this title and enacting provisions set out as notes preceding section 791 and under section 797 of this title] may be cited as the 'Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013'."

#### Short Title of 1990 Amendment

Pub. L. 101–575, §1, Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2834, provided that: "This Act [enacting section 2243 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, amending sections 796 and 824a–3 of this title and sections 2014, 2061, 2201, and 2284 of Title 42, and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 796 of this title] may be cited as the 'Solar, Wind, Waste, and Geothermal Power Production Incentives Act of 1990'."

#### Short Title of 1988 Amendment

Pub. L. 100–473, §1, Oct. 6, 1988, 102 Stat. 2299, provided that: "This Act [amending section 824e of this title and enacting provisions set out as notes under section 824e of this title] may be cited as the 'Regulatory Fairness Act'."

#### Short Title of 1986 Amendment

Pub. L. 99–495, §1(a), Oct. 16, 1986, 100 Stat. 1243, provided that: "This Act [enacting sections 797b and 823b of this title, amending sections 797, 800, 802, 803, 807, 808, 817, 823a, 824a–3, and 824j of this title, and enacting provisions set out as notes under sections 797, 803, 823a, 824a–3, and 825h of this title] may be cited as the 'Electric Consumers Protection Act of 1986'."
From: Bill Schrock/RTP/USEPA/US 

To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

Cc: John Bradfield/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Kelley Spence/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Robin Dunkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 07/05/2012 11:09 AM 

Subject: Re: Pulp and Paper RTR draft final rule 

________________________________________

Cortney - Robin is out this week but she will be back in the office on Monday. I'll try to get Joan 

to set the meeting up for Monday or Tuesday-are those times still good? Also, we'll be getting 

the rest of the memos/supporting documents out to you later today. Let me know if you need 

anything else. Thanks 

Bill Schrock

U.S. EPA

RTP, NC 27709

(919) 541-5032

(919) 541-3470 (fax)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5059 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5059

     To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
    Assistance Act to provide for the authority to reimburse local 
       governments for interest expenses, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 2019

   Mr. Dunn introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
    Assistance Act to provide for the authority to reimburse local 
       governments for interest expenses, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REIMBURSEMENT OF INTEREST PAYMENTS RELATED TO PUBLIC 
              ASSISTANCE.

    Title IV of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
Assistance Act is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 431. REIMBURSEMENT OF INTEREST PAYMENTS RELATED TO PUBLIC 
              ASSISTANCE.

    ``(a) In General.--The President may provide financial assistance 
to a local government as reimbursement for qualifying interest.
    ``(b) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions 
apply:
            ``(1) Qualifying interest.--The term `qualifying interest' 
        means, with respect to a qualifying loan, the lesser of--
                    ``(A) the actual interest paid to a lender for such 
                qualifying loan; and
                    ``(B) the interest that would have been paid to a 
                lender if such qualifying loan had an interest rate of 
                2 times the discount window primary credit interest 
                rate most recently published on the Federal Reserve 
                Statistical Release on selected interest rates (daily 
                or weekly) (commonly referred to as the `H.15 release' 
                or the `Federal funds rate').''.
            ``(2) Qualifying loan.--The term `qualifying loan' means a 
        loan--
                    ``(A) obtained by a local government; and
                    ``(B) of which not less than 90 percent of the 
                proceeds are used to fund activities for which such 
                local government receives assistance under this Act 
                after the date on which such loan is disbursed.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




                         Independent Auditors' Consent



The Board of Directors
Imperial Bancorp:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 2-75352), (No. 2-61660), (No. 2-98462) and (No. 2-75353) on Forms S-8
and S-16 of Imperial Bancorp of our report dated January 25, 2000, relating to
the consolidated balance sheet of Imperial Bancorp and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes in shareholders' equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, which
report appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of Imperial
Bancorp.

                                   KPMG LLP

March 27, 2000
#### Greater New York Film Rental Company, Appellant, v. Motion Picture Patents Company and Others, Respondents. (3 cases.)

In each case order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

      ( print page 15981)    
The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than April 6, 2011.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth Binning, Vice President, Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105-1579:

                    1.                     *Bank of Idaho Holding Company Employee Stock Ownership Plan,*                     Idaho Falls, Idaho; to retain control of Bank of Idaho Holding Company, and thereby indirectly retain control of The Bank of Idaho, both of Idaho Falls, Idaho.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 17, 2011.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2011-6650 Filed 3-21-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
§ 300.625 Children's rights. ( a ) The SEA must have in effect policies and procedures regarding the extent to which children are afforded rights of privacy similar to those afforded to parents, taking into consideration the age of the child and type or severity of disability.
( b ) Under the regulations for FERPA in 34 CFR 99.5(a), the rights of parents regarding education records are transferred to the student at age 18.
( c ) If the rights accorded to parents under Part B of the Act are transferred to a student who reaches the age of majority, consistent with § 300.520, the rights regarding educational records in §§ 300.613 through 300.624 must also be transferred to the student. However, the public agency must provide any notice required under section 615 of the Act to the student and the parents.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(8); 1417(c))
§ 299.9 What are the requirements concerning property, equipment, and supplies for the benefit of private school children and teachers? Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70344 , Aug. 29, 2024.
( a ) A agency, consortium, or entity must keep title to, and exercise continuing administrative control of, all property, equipment, and supplies that the agency, consortium, or entity acquires with funds under a program listed in § 299.6(b) for the benefit of eligible private school children and their teachers and other educational personnel.
( b ) The agency, consortium, or entity may place equipment and supplies in a private school for the period of time needed for the program.
( c ) The agency, consortium, or entity shall ensure that the equipment and supplies placed in a private school— ( 1 ) Are used only for proper purposes of the program; and
( 2 ) Can be removed from the private school without remodeling the private school facility.
( d ) The agency, consortium, or entity must remove equipment and supplies from a private school if— ( 1 ) The equipment and supplies are no longer needed for the purposes of the program; or
( 2 ) Removal is necessary to avoid unauthorized use of the equipment or supplies for other than the purposes of the program.
( e ) No funds may be used for repairs, minor remodeling, or construction of private school facilities.
[62 FR 28252, May 22, 1997, as amended at 84 FR 31679, July 2, 2019]
Exhibit 10.83

SECOND AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT

This SECOND AMENDMENT made as of the 1st day of July, 2004 by and between
Revlon Consumer Products Corporation (Revlon) and Senetek, PLC (Senetek) amending the License Agreement between the parties dated June 8, 2000 as amended February, 2001 (the Agreement).

W I T N E S S E T H :

WHEREAS, Revlon and Senetek desire to amend the Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants hereinafter
set forth, Revlon and Senetek agree as follows:



|1. | Unless otherwise indicated herein, all capitalized terms are defined as set forth in the Agreement.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The Exclusivity Right set forth in Section 2.2 is terminated and the Agreement shall continue on a non-exclusive basis.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Effective as of the calendar quarter in which shipments for the Almay Kinetin Skin Smoothing restage commence, the first sentence of Section 2.4 is deleted and replaced with:
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On sales by Revlon of any Products, a royalty shall be due Senetek calculated at the rate of *** of Net Sales for all
Products except Color Cosmetics and Combination Products, for which the rate shall be *** of Net Sales. Trial Sizes of less than one quarter (1/4) ounce shall bear no royalty.



|4. | Sections 1.19, 1.20, 2.3, 3.1.4 and 8.3 and Schedules 1.19, 1.20 and 3.1.4 are deleted.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|5. | Except as otherwise expressly stated herein, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Second Amendment as of the date first written above.



Senetek, PLCBy:

/s/ [ILLEGIBLE]Title:

Chairman & CEORevlon Consumer Products CorporationBy:

/s/ [ILLEGIBLE]Title:

Exec VP


*** Confidential treatment has been requested
#### The Bay Dredging and Contracting Company, Respondent, v. Culluloo Park Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
# C_2005111EN.01000501.xml

| 11.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 May 2005

(2005/C 111/05)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2954 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,28 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4449 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68070 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1680 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5457 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 83,14 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1119 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9559 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5797 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 29,961 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 248,91 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6958 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1542 |
| ROL | Romanian leu | 36 326 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,53 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 38,804 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,7352 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6589 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6158 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0960 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7635 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,1194 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 295,01 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 7,7365 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,7214 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3460 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 319,25 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,924 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,880 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,9900 |
| THB | Thai baht | 51,124 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2954

JPY

Japanese yen

135,28

DKK

Danish krone

7,4449

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68070

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1680

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5457

ISK

Iceland króna

83,14

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1119

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9559

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5797

CZK

Czech koruna

29,961

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

248,91

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6958

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1542

ROL

Romanian leu

36 326

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,53

SKK

Slovak koruna

38,804

TRY

Turkish lira

1,7352

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6589

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6158

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0960

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7635

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,1194

KRW

South Korean won

1 295,01

ZAR

South African rand

7,7365

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,7214

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3460

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 319,25

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,924

PHP

Philippine peso

69,880

RUB

Russian rouble

35,9900

THB

Thai baht

51,124

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### § 552.30 Purpose and scope.

The Bureau of Prisons primary objectives in all hostage situations are to safely free the hostage(s) and to regain control of the institution.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 2, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1063

Lower Tribunal No. 16-29900

________________

Incubacol, S.A.S.,

Appellant,

vs.

Poultry and Industrial Suppliers, Inc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Charles K. 

Johnson, Judge.

Eaton & Wolk, PL and Douglas F. Eaton, for appellant.

Homer Bonner and Christopher J. King and Antonio M. Hernandez, Jr., 

for appellee.

Before LINDSEY, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Damicet Corp. v. Sidauy, 306 So. 3d 171, 173 (Fla. 3d 
2

DCA 2020) (citing Abeid–Saba v. Carnival Corp., 184 So. 3d 593, 603 (Fla. 

3d DCA 2016)).
#### John D. Casey, Administrator, Appellee, v. The Peter Schoenhofen Brewing Company, Appellant.

Gen. No. 15,503.

*Verdicts—when not disturbed as against the evidence.*A verdict will not be set aside on review as against the evidence unless clearly and manifestly against its weight.

Action in case for death caused by alleged wrongful act. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. John Gibbons, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1909.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed February 16, 1911.

Lackner, Butz *&*Miller, for appellant.

Daniel L. Cruice and A. S. Langille, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff’s intestate, a boy six years old, was run over by a beer wagon of the defendant and so injured that he died. He left parents, brothers and sisters. In an action by his administrator, under the statute, in which the declaration alleged that the death of the deceased was caused by the negligence of the defendant, by the servants in charge of the team and wagon, plaintiff had judgment for $2,000, and the defendant appealed.

The wagon of the defendant, drawn by a pair of mules, was going east in Thirt'-enth street. The plaintiff’s intestate started across the street from the *572south side to the north, came in contact with one of the mules, was knocked down and the wagon ran over him.

The testimony is conflicting. That for the plaintiff tended to show that the mules were being driven at a rapid and dangerous rate of speed, *and*that the deceased was in view of the driver for a sufficient length of time before the accident to have enabled the driver to avoid coming in collision with the deceased. That for the defendant tended to show that the mules were going at a slow trot; that on the south side of the street was a pile of lumber four or five feet high, extending out from the curb; that the deceased ran out from behind the pile of lumber, on the side farthest from the wagon, and that it was impossible, after the deceased came in view of the driver, for the latter to stop his team or turn to one side in time to avoid the accident.

We think that on the evidence the question whether the driver of defendant’s team was guilty of the negligence alleged in the declaration, was a question for the jury, and that their finding, implied by their verdict, that he was negligent cannot be said to be so manifestly against the evidence as to warrant or justify a reversal of the judgment.

Complaint is made of two instructions given for the plaintiff, on the ground that each contains assumptions of fact. We do not think that either of said instructions can be held to contain any assumption of fact.

We perceive nothing in the conduct of plaintiff’s counsel on the trial so manifestly improper and prejudicial to the defendant as to require a reversal of the judgment.

The record is, in our opinion, free from reversible error, and the judgment is affirmed.

*'Affirmed.*