alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re ESTATE of Rhoda W. PARNELL.

No. 117357.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

Sept. 27, 1967.

*610Shellie F. Bowers, Washington, D. C., for William White, Heir.

Benjamin Rossner, Washington, D. C., for Archie Parnell, Administrator.

OPINION

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

The question presented by the objections of the heir of the intestate to the account of the administrator, is whether in case of a tenancy by the entirety, if one spouse dies, the surviving spouse, who pays debts secured by a deed of trust or a mortgage on the property in question, is entitled to contribution from the estate of the deceased spouse for one-half of the payments made by him. In this instance the Administrator in his account proposes to claim such contribution.

 This question has not been decided by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. There are, however, unpublished decisions by judges of this Court allowing such contributions. Since the District of Columbia derives its common law from Maryland, decisions of the Court of Appeals of Maryland on questions that have not been determined by the Court of Appeals for this Circuit are of great weight, and perhaps of greater weight than decisions of the courts of other states. This is peculiarly true in connection with the law of real property. The Court of Appeals of Maryland, in Cunningham v. Cunningham, 158 Md. 372, 148 A. 444, 67 A.L.R. 1176, held that in such a situation the right of contribution exists. The basis for the rulings to which the Court has just referred is that if both spouses were liable for the indebtedness, the estate of the deceased spouse is liable for half of it and, therefore, is liable for contribution to the surviving spouse if the latter pays the entire indebtedness.

Insofar as the equities are concerned, the Court is of the opinion that they are clearly with the *surviving*spouse. The husband and wife acquired the property in question as tenants by the entirety, presumably as a residence. He took it by right of survivorship. There is no reason why the next of kin should have a windfall, which they would receive if the estate of the deceased spouse was not required to contribute one-half of the payment made by the surviving husband.

The objections to the administrator’s account are overruled.
### §2283. Transportation of explosive, biological, chemical, or radioactive or nuclear materials

(a) In General.—Whoever knowingly transports aboard any vessel within the United States and on waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States or any vessel outside the United States and on the high seas or having United States nationality an explosive or incendiary device, biological agent, chemical weapon, or radioactive or nuclear material, knowing that any such item is intended to be used to commit an offense listed under section 2332b(g)(5)(B), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both.

(b) Causing Death.—Any person who causes the death of a person by engaging in conduct prohibited by subsection (a) may be punished by death.

(c) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) Biological agent.—The term "biological agent" means any biological agent, toxin, or vector (as those terms are defined in section 178).

(2) By-product material.—The term "by-product material" has the meaning given that term in section 11(e) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2014(e)).

(3) Chemical weapon.—The term "chemical weapon" has the meaning given that term in section 229F(1).

(4) Explosive or incendiary device.—The term "explosive or incendiary device" has the meaning given the term in section 232(5) and includes explosive materials, as that term is defined in section 841(c) and explosive as defined in section 844(j).

(5) Nuclear material.—The term "nuclear material" has the meaning given that term in section 831(f)(1).1

(6) Radioactive material.—The term "radioactive material" means—

(A) source material and special nuclear material, but does not include natural or depleted uranium;

(B) nuclear by-product material;

(C) material made radioactive by bombardment in an accelerator; or

(D) all refined isotopes of radium.

(8) 2 Source material.—The term "source material" has the meaning given that term in section 11(z) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2014(z)).

(9) Special nuclear material.—The term "special nuclear material" has the meaning given that term in section 11(aa) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2014(aa)).

(Added Pub. L. 109–177, title III, §305(a), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 236.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 831(f)(1), referred to in subsec. (c)(5), was redesignated section 831(g)(1) by Pub. L. 114–23, title VIII, §812(d), June 2, 2015, 129 Stat. 312.

1 See References in Text note below.

2 So in original. No par. (7) has been enacted.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 865

 891

 822

 817

 819

 825

 782

 823

 795

 788

 821

 806

 836

 837

 847

 859

 850

 898

 881

 900

 908

 0

 0

 865

 863

 851

 877

 894

 867

 896

 922

 761

 797

 778

 775

 780

 777

 769

 778

 761

 762

 787

 792

 796

 795

 809

 820

 823

 834

 772

 790

 879

 0

 0

 828

 812

 812

 852

 861

 860

 864

 876

 821

 857

 801

 793

 795

 801

 776

 798

 783

 771

 805

 798

 810

 815

 826

 837

 839

 861

 814

 830

 895

 0

 0

 841

 834

 831

 864

 884

 864

 880

 904

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 5, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 523

 546

 511

 506

 507

 511

 496

 509

 500

 492

 513

 509

 517

 520

 526

 533

 535

 548

 519

 529

 569

 0

 0

 536

 531

 530

 550

 562

 550

 560

 575

TOTAL 24,028

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
§ 217.6 Carrier agreements. ( a ) *General.* The carrier agreements referred to in section 217(e) of the Act shall be made by the Commissioner on behalf of the Attorney General and shall be on Form I-775, Visa Waiver Pilot Program Agreement.
( b ) *Termination of agreements.* The Commissioner, on behalf of the Attorney General, may terminate any carrier agreement under this part, with 5 days notice to a carrier, for the carrier's failure to meet the terms of such agreement. As a matter of discretion, the Commissioner may notify a carrier of the existence of a basis for termination of a carrier agreement under this part and allow the carrier a period not to exceed 15 days within which the carrier may bring itself into compliance with the terms of the carrier agreement. The agreement shall be subject to cancellation by either party for any reason upon 15 days' written notice to the other party.
[62 FR 10352, Mar. 6, 1997]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of IDACORP, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, (the"Report"), I, J. LaMont Keen, President and Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify that:

(1)              The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| */s/J. LaMont Keen*                   |
|---------------------------------------|
| J. LaMont Keen                        |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| February 28, 2008                     |
|                                       |

----
Robert B. Easterling, VSB#15552 

2217 Princess Anne Street, Suite 100-2 

Fredericksburg, VA 22401 

(540) 373-5030 

FAX (540) 373-5234 

eastlaw@easterlinglaw.com 

Counsel for Debtor 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Alexandria Division 

 

IN RE: 

CLINT ALLEN DRAPER Case No. 18-13346-KHK 

 Chapter 7 

 Debtor. 

____________________________________________________________________ 

CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC 

 Movant, 

v. 

CLINT ALLEN DRAPER 

and 

H. JASON GOLD, Trustee 

 Debtor 

RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY 

 COMES NOW the Debtor, Clint Allen Draper, and, by Counsel, for his answer to the 

motion for relief from stay filed against him herein by Movant, ("the Motion") states as follows: 

1. The Debtor admits the allegations of Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 of the Motion. 

2. The Debtor denies the allegations of Paragraph 8 of the Motion, and avers that he has 

made each payment due from December 2018 through April 2019. 

3. The Debtor does not have sufficient knowledge or information to either admit or deny 

the allegations of Paragraph 9 of the Motion, and therefore he denies the same and demands 

strict proof thereof. 

Case 18-13346-KHK Doc 51 Filed 04/25/19 Entered 04/25/19 19:30:17 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
2

4. Upon information, the Debtor denies the allegations of Paragraphs 10 and 11 of the 

Motion. 

5. The Debtor admits the allegations of Paragraph 12 of the Motion. 

 WHEREFORE, having fully responded, Debtor prays that the Motion be denied and that 

he may have his costs and fees expended herein. 

CLINT ALLEN DRAPER 

Debtor 

 By Counsel 

 /s/Robert B. Easterling_______ 

 Robert B. Easterling 

Robert B. Easterling, VSB #15552 

2217 Princess Anne Street, Suite 100-2 

Fredericksburg, VA 22401 

(540)373-5030 

FAX (540)373-5234 

eastlaw@easterlinglaw.com 

Counsel for Debtor 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I, Robert B. Easterling, do hereby certify that I have served a true copy of the enclosed 

Response to Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay by electronic service using the ECF 

Filing System on this 25th day of April 2019 to Malcolm Brooks Savage III of Shapiro and 

Brown, LLP and to H. Jason Gold, Trustee, at their internet addresses registered with the Court.

. 

 /s/Robert B. Easterling______ 

 Robert B. Easterling 

Case 18-13346-KHK Doc 51 Filed 04/25/19 Entered 04/25/19 19:30:17 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
(No. 73-CC-440

#### Atlantic Richfield Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Registration and Education, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 23, 1973.*

D. K. Mc Intosh, Attorney for Claimant.

*56William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Local Government Letters 
Letter S1 Continued

Letter L1 

L1-1 

10-18

Responses to Letter L1 

L1-1 Thank you for your comment. 
Letter L2 

L2-1 

10-19

Responses to Letter L2 

L2-1 Thank you for your comment. 
Letter L3 

L3-1 

L3-1 

10-20

Responses to Letter L3 

Thank you for your comment. 
L4-1 

Letter L4 

10-21

Responses to Letter L4 

L4-1 Thank you for your comment. 
L5-1 

Letter L5 

10-22

Responses to Letter L5 

L5-1 Thank you for your comment.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel, New, Rapidly-Acting Treatments for Treatment-Resistant Depression (RAPID).                    

*Date:*                         April 7, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         11 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Francois Boller, MD, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6142, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, 301-443-1513,                         *bollerf@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 15, 2011.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-6733 Filed 3-21-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# FILED Oct. 25, 1995 Cecil Crowson, Jr . Appellate Court Clerk W ILLIAM W AYNE BRAY, ) ) Plaintiff/Appellant, ) ) Appeal No. ) 01-A-01-9506- CV-00228 VS. ) ) Clay Circuit e ) No. 1227 W ANDA LEE JONES BRA Y, ) ) Defendant/Appellee. )

COURT OF APPE ALS OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE

APPEALE D FRO M THE C IRCU IT COU RT OF C LAY C OUNTY AT CELINA, TENNE SSEE THE HONORABLE JOHN TURN BULL, JUDGE

E. GUY HO LLIMAN WILLIAM JOSEPH BUTLER FARRAR & H OLLIMAN 102-A Scottsv ille Hig hway P. O. Box 280 Lafayette, Tennessee 37083 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appella nt JAMES D. W HITE, JR. 101 Green Street Celina, Tennessee38551 Attorney for Defendant/Appellee

AFFIRMED AND REMAN DED

BEN H. CAN TRELL, JUDGE

CONCUR: TODD, P.J., M .S. LEW IS, J.1 Rule 10( b) of t he Rules ofthe Court of Appeal s reads as f oll ows: The Court, wit h the concu rrence ofall judges parti cipat ing i n the case, may affirm, rever se or modify the act ions ofthe t ri al court by mem o ran dum opinion when a fo rm al o pin ion wo uld ha ve no pre ce de ntia l va lue . W he n a ca se is d ec id ed b y mem orandum opinio n it sha ll be de sign ated "ME MO RA ND UM OP INIO N," shall not be publi shed, and shal l not be ci ted or

rel ied on for any

reason i n a subsequentunrel ated case. - 2 -



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

In this case thehusband has appealed the trial j udge's award of$14,750 to the wife as h er share of the mar ital propert y. The trial j udge made the follow ing findings: that the husband' s property had increased in value during the marriage in the amount, when added to the value of some pr operty acq uired by t he parties, of $34,000; that the c attle acquir ed by the par ties had a neg ative value of $4,500, leaving a net value of $29,500; that t he wife had made a contribution to the preservat ion and appreci ation of the property; that the wi fe had a greater need than the husband; and that th e husband had a greater ability to produce in come in th e future. Taking the net i ncrease in the marital estateof $29,500 the trial judge the n awarded hal f of it to the wi fe.

We find from the recor d that the e v idence does not pr eponderate against the trial j udge's finding s of fact. Therefore, we affirm the trial court's judg ment and tax the co sts on appeal to the appellant.

__ ______________________ ____ _ BEN H. CAN TRELL, JUDGE CONCUR:

_______________________________ HENRY F . TODD, PRESID ING JUDGE MIDDLE SECTION

_______________________________ SAMUEL L. LEWIS, JUDGE
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7511]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance 
Center Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer 
Assistance Center Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, May 19, 2011; Friday, May 20, 
2011; and Saturday, May 21, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-
231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance 
Center Project Committee will be held Thursday, May 19, 2011 from 1 
p.m. to 5 p.m.; Friday, May 20, 2011 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.; and 
Saturday, May 21, 2011 from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. Pacific Time in San 
Diego, CA. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Notification of intent to 
participate must be made with Ms. Ellen Smiley. For more information 
and site location, please contact Ms. Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-
231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, 
Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: March 24, 2011.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2011-7511 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.3

CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN, INC

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Annual Report of California Pizza Kitchen, Inc (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
January 3, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Susan M. Collyns, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

March 19, 2010



By:

/s/    SUSAN M.
COLLYNSSusan M. Collyns Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer








|* | This certificate accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### §410zzz–3. Administration

(a) The Secretary of the Interior shall administer, protect, develop, and maintain the Saint-Gaudens National Historical Park subject to the provisions of this subchapter and in accordance with the provisions of the Act entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes", approved August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535), as amended and supplemented, and the provisions of the Act entitled "An Act to provide for the preservation of historic American sites, buildings, objects, and antiquities of national significance, and for other purposes", approved August 21, 1935 (49 Stat. 666).

(b) In order that the Saint-Gaudens National Historical Park may achieve more effectively its purpose as a living memorial, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to cooperate with the Saint-Gaudens Memorial, the American Academy of Arts and Letters, and other organizations and groups in the presentation of art expositions and festivals and other appropriate events that are traditional to the park.

(Pub. L. 88–543, §4, Aug. 31, 1964, 78 Stat. 749; Pub. L. 116–9, title II, §2201(b)(1), (4), Mar. 12, 2019, 133 Stat. 733, 734.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes", approved August 25, 1916, referred to in subsec. (a), is act Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, 39 Stat. 535, popularly known as the National Park Service Organic Act, which enacted sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 100101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Sections 1 to 4 of the Act were repealed and restated as section 1865(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of Title 54 by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

The Act entitled "An Act to provide for the preservation of historic American sites, buildings, objects, and antiquities of national significance, and for other purposes", approved August 21, 1935, referred to in subsec. (a), is act Aug. 21, 1935, ch. 593, 49 Stat. 666, known as the Historic Sites, Buildings and Antiquities Act and also as the Historic Sites Act of 1935, which enacted sections 461 to 467 of this title. The Act was repealed and restated as section 1866(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and sections 102303 and 102304 and chapter 3201 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs, by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–9 substituted "National Historical Park" for "National Historic Site" in subsecs. (a) and (b) and "traditional to the park" for "traditional to the site" in subsec. (b).
#### In the Matter of Raymond J. Roth for Admission to Practice as an Attorney and Counselor at Law. (From the State of Illinois.)

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
#### George H. Westbrook, Respondent, v. Onondaga Company, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

*709Present —- Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.