Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 63 / Friday, April 1, 2011 / Notices 18151 

If you wish to participate in the 

public meeting for the 16th session of 

the CCFFV by conference call, please 

use the call-in number and participant 

code listed below: 

Call-in Number: 1–866–692–3158 

Participant code: 5986642 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 

About the 16th Session of the CCFFV 

Contact: 

Dorian Lafond, International 

Standards Coordinator, Fruit and 

Vegetable Programs, Office of the 

Administrator, AMS, USDA, 1400 

Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20250, phone: (202) 

690–4944 fax: (202) 720–4722, e-mail: 

Dorian.Lafond@ams.usda.gov. 

For Further Information About the 

Public Meeting Contact: Kenneth 

Lowery, US Codex Office, 1400 

Independence Avenue, SW., Room 

4861, Washington, DC 20250, phone: 

(202) 690–4042, fax: (202) 720–3157, email: Kenneth.Lowery@fsis.usda.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Codex was established in 1963 by two 

United Nations organizations, the Food 

and Agriculture Organization and the 

World Health Organization. Through 

adoption of food standards, codes of 

practice, and other guidelines 

developed by its committees, and by 

promoting their adoption and 

implementation by governments, Codex 

seeks to protect the health of consumers 

and ensure that fair practices are used 

in trade. 

The CCFFV is responsible for 

elaborating worldwide standards and 

codes of practice as may be appropriate 

for fresh fruits and vegetables, 

consulting with the United Nations 

Economic Commission for Europe 

(UNECE) Working Party on Agricultural 

Quality Standards in the elaboration of 

worldwide standards and codes of 

practice with particular regard to 

ensuring that there is no duplication of 

standards or codes of practice and that 

they follow the same broad format, and 

consulting as necessary with other 

international organizations which are 

active in the area of standardization of 

fresh fruits and vegetables. 

The Committee is hosted by Mexico. 

Issues To Be Discussed at the Public 

Meeting 

The following items on the agenda for 

the 16th session of the CCFFV will be 

discussed during the public meeting: 

• Matters arising from Codex and 

other Codex Committees—Need for 

international Standard for Fresh Fungus 

‘‘Chanterelle.’’ Possible extension of 

territorial application of the Codex 

Standard for Fresh Fungus 

‘‘Chanterelle’’. 

• Matters arising from other 

International Organizations on the 

Standardization of Fresh Fruits and 

Vegetables. 

• UNECE Standards for Fresh Fruits 

and Vegetables—UNECE Standard for 

Avocado. 

• Draft Standard for Avocado. 

• Draft Standard for Tree Tomatoes. 

• Proposed Draft Standard for Chili 

Peppers. 

• Proposed Draft Standard for 

Pomegranate. 

• Proposed Layout for Codex 

Standards for Fresh Fruits and 

Vegetables. 

• Discussion Paper on Point of 

Application of Codex Standards for 

Fresh Fruits and Vegetables including 

Quality Tolerances at Import and Export 

Control Points. 

• Proposals for New Work on Codex 

Standards for Fresh Fruits and 

Vegetables. 

Each issue listed will be fully 

described in documents distributed, or 

to be distributed, by the Secretariat prior 

to the meeting. Members of the public 

may access these documents (see 

ADDRESSES). 

Public Meeting 

At the April 5, 2011, public meeting, 

draft U.S. positions on the agenda items 

will be described and discussed, and 

attendees will have the opportunity to 

pose questions and offer comments. 

Written comments may be offered at the 

meeting or sent to the U.S. Delegate for 

the 16th session of the CCFFV, Dorian 

Lafond (see ADDRESSES). Written 

comments should state that they relate 

to activities of the 16th session of the 

CCFFV. 

USDA Nondiscrimination Statement 

USDA prohibits discrimination in all 

its programs and activities on the basis 

of race, color, national origin, gender, 

religion, age, disability, political beliefs, 

sexual orientation, and marital or family 

status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to 

all programs.) 

Persons with disabilities who require 

alternative means for communication of 

program information (Braille, large 

print, audiotape, etc.) should contact 

USDA’s Target Center at (202) 720–2600 

(voice and TTY). 

To file a written complaint of 

discrimination, write USDA, Office of 

the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 

1400 Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20250–9410 or call 

(202) 720–5964 (voice and TTY). USDA 

is an equal opportunity provider and 

employer. 

Additional Public Notification 

Public awareness of all segments of 

rulemaking and policy development is 

important. Consequently, in an effort to 

ensure that the public and in particular 

minorities, women, and persons with 

disabilities, are aware of this notice, 

FSIS will announce it on-line through 

the FSIS Web page located at http:// 

www.fsis.usda.gov/ 

regulations_&_policies/ 

Federal_Register_Notices/index.asp. 

FSIS also will make copies of this 

Federal Register publication available 

through the FSIS Constituent Update, 

which is used to provide information 

regarding FSIS policies, procedures, 

regulations, Federal Register notices, 

FSIS public meetings, and other types of 

information that could affect or would 

be of interest to our constituents and 

stakeholders. The Update is 

communicated via Listserv, a free e-mail 

subscription service consisting of 

industry, trade, and farm groups, 

consumer interest groups, allied health 

professionals, scientific professionals, 

and other individuals who have 

requested to be included. The Update 

also is available on the FSIS Web page. 

Through Listserv and the Web page, 

FSIS is able to provide information to a 

much broader, more diverse audience. 

In addition, FSIS offers an e-mail 

subscription service which provides 

automatic and customized access to 

selected food safety news and 

information. This service is available at 

http://www.fsis.usda.gov/ 

News_&_Events/Email_Subscription/. 

Options range from recalls, export 

information, regulations, directives, and 

notices. Customers can add or delete 

subscriptions themselves, and have the 

option to password protect their 

accounts. 

Done at Washington, DC on: March 25, 

2011. 

Karen Stuck, 

U.S. Manager for Codex Alimentarius. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7646 Filed 3–31–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Forest Service 

Kootenai National Forest, Lincoln 

County, MT; Miller West Fisher Project 

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. 

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a 

supplemental environmental impact 

statement. 

SUMMARY: The Forest Service will 

prepare a Supplemental Environmental 

Impact Statement (SEIS) for the Miller 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

18152 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 63 / Friday, April 1, 2011 / Notices 

West Fisher Project. The Project 

includes timber harvest, fuels reduction, 

precommercial thinning, prescribed fire, 

watershed rehabilitation activities, pool 

creation in Miller Creek, improvement 

of trails and trailheads, fuels 

management and hazard tree removal in 

Lake Creek Campground, and access 

management changes, including road 

decommissioning. The project is located 

in the Silverfish Planning Subunit on 

the Libby Ranger District, Kootenai 

National Forest, Lincoln County, 

Montana, and south of Libby, Montana. 

The Notice of Availability of the Draft 

EIS for this project was published in the 

Federal Register (vol. 74, no. 43) on 

March 6, 2009, and the notice of the 

Final EIS (vol. 74 no. 126) on July 2, 

2009. The Record of Decision was 

issued in June of 2009. The Record of 

Decision was litigated in District Court 

for the District of Montana (CV 09–M– 

DWM) on issues regarding the grizzly 

bear analysis. The District Judge 

remanded the project to the Forest 

Service to address deficiencies in 

disclosures in the analysis. A 

Supplemental EIS is being prepared to 

address these disclosures in the grizzly 

bear analysis. 

DATES: Scoping is not required for 

supplements to environmental impact 

statements [40 CFR 1502.9(c)(4)]. There 

was extensive public involvement in the 

development of the proposed action, the 

Draft EIS and the Final EIS, and the 

Forest Service is not inviting comments 

at this time. A Draft SEIS is expected to 

be available for public review and 

comment in May 2011; and a Final SEIS 

in June 2011. 

ADDRESSES: The line officer responsible 

for this analysis is Malcolm Edwards, 

District Ranger, Libby Ranger District, 

12557 MT Hwy 37, Libby, MT 59923. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Contact Leslie McDougall, Team Leader, 

Three Rivers Ranger District, at (406) 

295–4693. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Miller 

West Fisher Project Area is 

approximately 20 air miles south of 

Libby, Montana, within all or portions 

of T25N, R29W–R31W, T26N, R29W– 

R31W, T27N, R29W–R31W, PMM, 

Lincoln County, Montana. 

The Miller West Fisher Project 

Supplemental EIS will provide 

additional information and disclosures 

on the grizzly bear analysis in support 

of the Record of Decision issued in June 

2009. More specifically, the 

Supplemental EIS will provide 

clarification and additional information 

on the following disclosures as 

requested by the District Court of 

Montana: 

1. Why the Bear Management Unit is 

the appropriate scale of analysis for 

cumulative effects; 

2. Further discussion on the 

limitations of Wakkinen and Kasworm 

(1997) utilized as the Best Available 

Science in regard to grizzly bear habitat 

protection in the Cabinet-Yaak 

Ecosystem Grizzly Bear Recovery Zone; 

3. Further explanation on how the 

Miller West Fisher Project was made 

compatible with grizzly bear needs, 

consistent with the Kootenai National 

Forest 1987 Forest Plan; 

4. Address potential incidental take of 

grizzly bear in areas outside the 

recovery zone that are occupied by 

grizzly bears; 

5. Provide further explanation for why 

helicopter logging would not cause 

harm to grizzly bear. 

Record of Decision—Alternative 6- 

Modified 

The Miller West Fisher Project Record 

of Decision issued in June 2009 

authorized the following: 

Vegetation treatments: Timber harvest 

and associated fuel treatment on 1,898 

acres, including intermediate harvest on 

approximately 1,206 acres and 

regeneration harvest on approximately 

692 acres; pre-commercial thinning will 

be implemented on approximately 351 

acres; prescribed fire will be completed 

on 2,830 acres. These activities would 

contribute approximately 8.2 million 

board feet (MMBF) of timber products to 

the economy. 

Transportation actions: Construction 

of 3.29 miles of temporary road for 

timber harvest, to be obliterated 

afterward; implementation of best 

management practices (BMPs) and road 

maintenance work will be applied to 

approximately 38.99 miles of haul 

roads; placing 19.2 miles of road into 

intermittent stored service; 

decommissioning 1.43 miles of road; 

access changes are included to address 

watershed impacts, increase big game 

security through reduction in open road 

density (ORD), and to create grizzly bear 

core habitat in bear management unit 

(BMU) 6. 

Other activities: Pool creation in 

Miller Creek and stream bank 

stabilization in West Fisher Creek; 

improvement of trails and trailheads, 

including 5.9 miles of trail tread 

improvements for safety; fuels reduction 

and hazard tree removal in the Lake 

Creek Campground; spring development 

in the North Fork of Miller Creek; 

culvert replacement at the 0.5 milepost 

on Rd. 2314 to remove a barrier to fish 

and aquatic species. 

Supplemental Environmental Impact 

Statement 

A Draft SEIS is expected to be 

available for public review and 

comment in May 2011; and a Final SEIS 

in June 2011. The comment period for 

the Draft SEIS will be 45 days from the 

date the Environmental Protection 

Agency publishes the notice of 

availability in the Federal Register. 

The Forest Service believes, at this 

early stage, it is important to give 

reviewers notice of several court rulings 

related to public participation in the 

environmental review process. First, 

reviewers of draft environmental impact 

statements must structure their 

participation in the environmental 

review of the proposal so that it is 

meaningful and alerts an agency to the 

reviewer’s position and contentions. 

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. 

NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also, 

environmental objections that could be 

raised at the draft environmental impact 

statement stage but that are not raised 

until after completion of the final 

environmental impact statement may be 

waived or dismissed by the courts. City 

of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 

1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin 

Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 

1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of 

these court rulings, it is very important 

that those interested in this proposed 

action participate by the close of the 45- 

day comment period so that substantive 

comments and objections are made 

available to the Forest Service at a time 

when it can meaningfully consider them 

and respond to them in the final 

supplemental environmental impact 

statement. 

To assist the Forest Service in 

identifying and considering issues and 

concerns on the proposed action, 

comments on the Draft SEIS should be 

as specific as possible. It is also helpful 

if comments refer to specific pages or 

chapters of the draft statement. 

Reviewers may wish to refer to the 

Council on Environmental Quality 

Regulations for implementing the 

procedural provisions of the National 

Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 

1503.3 in addressing these points. 

Responsible Official 

Paul Bradford, Forest Supervisor of 

the Kootenai National Forest, 31374 US 

Hwy 2, Libby, MT 59923 is the 

Responsible Official for the Miller West 

Fisher Project. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 63 / Friday, April 1, 2011 / Notices 18153 

Dated: March 24, 2011. 

Maggie Pittman, 

Acting Forest Supervisor, Kootenai National 

Forest. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7751 Filed 3–31–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–11–P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Forest Service 

Southwest Idaho Resource Advisory 

Committee 

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. 

ACTION: Notice of meeting. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in 

the Federal Advisory Committee Act 

(Pub. L. 92–463) and under the Secure 

Rural Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act of 2000, as amended, 

(Pub. L. 110–343), the Boise, Payette, 

Salmon-Challis, and Sawtooth National 

Forests’ Southwest Idaho Resource 

Advisory Committee will conduct a 

business meeting. The meeting is open 

to the public. 

DATES: Thursday, April 21, 2011, 

beginning at 9 a.m. 

ADDRESSES: Idaho Counties Risk 

Management Program Building, 3100 

South Vista Avenue, Boise, Idaho. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda 

topics will include review and approval 

of project proposals, and is an open 

public forum. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim 

Pierson, Designated Federal Official, at 

(208) 347–0301 or e-mail 

kpierson@fs.fed.us. 

Dated: March 24, 2011. 

Suzanne C. Rainville, 

Forest Supervisor, Payette National Forest. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7748 Filed 3–31–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–11–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Advance Notification of 

Sunset Reviews 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

Background 

Every five years, pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the 

International Trade Commission 

automatically initiate and conduct a 

review to determine whether revocation 

of a countervailing or antidumping duty 

order or termination of an investigation 

suspended under section 704 or 734 of 

the Act would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

or a countervailable subsidy (as the case 

may be) and of material injury. 

Upcoming Sunset Reviews for May 

2011 

The following Sunset Reviews are 

scheduled for initiation in May 2011 

and will appear in that month’s Notice 

of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset 

Reviews. 

Department 

contact 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings 

Artist Canvas from the PRC (A–570–899) ............................................................................................................ Julia Hancock, 

(202) 482–1394. 

Gray Portland Cement and Cement Clinker from Japan (A–588–815) (3rd Review) .......................................... Dana Mermelstein, 

(202) 482–1391. 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings 

No Sunset Review of countervailing duty orders are scheduled for initiation in May 2011. 

Suspended Investigations 

No Sunset Review of suspended investigations are scheduled for initiation in May 2011. 

The Department’s procedures for the 

conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth 

in 19 CFR 351.218. Guidance on 

methodological or analytical issues 

relevant to the Department’s conduct of 

Sunset Reviews is set forth in the 

Department’s Policy Bulletin 98.3— 

Policies Regarding the Conduct of FiveYear (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Orders; Policy 

Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 (April 16, 1998). 

The Notice of Initiation of Five-Year 

(‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews provides further 

information regarding what is required 

of all parties to participate in Sunset 

Reviews. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the 

Department will maintain and make 

available a service list for these 

proceedings. To facilitate the timely 

preparation of the service list(s), it is 

requested that those seeking recognition 

as interested parties to a proceeding 

contact the Department in writing 

within 10 days of the publication of the 

Notice of Initiation. 

Please note that if the Department 

receives a Notice of Intent to Participate 

from a member of the domestic industry 

within 15 days of the date of initiation, 

the review will continue. Thereafter, 

any interested party wishing to 

participate in the Sunset Review must 

provide substantive comments in 

response to the notice of initiation no 

later than 30 days after the date of 

initiation. 

This notice is not required by statute 

but is published as a service to the 

international trading community. 

Dated: March 25, 2011. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7760 Filed 3–31–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity To Request 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sheila E. Forbes, Office of AD/CVD 

Operations, Customs Unit, Import 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES