alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 495

 491

 528

 593

 574

 600

 638

 601

 637

 646

 625

 656

 686

 681

 670

 684

 677

 500

 450

 473

 464

 456

 480

 455

 468

 465

 455

 482

 502

 508

 466

 464

 466

 465

 454

 424

 403

 389

 392

 404

 404

 400

 393

 389

 385

 379

 372

 364

 361

 449

 375

 375

 429

 423

 417

 419

 378

 383

 394

 369

 487

 475

 495

 538

 498

 494

 500

 463

 461

 460

 447

 456

 456

 461

 453

 443

 445

 397

 403

 461

 431

 412

 445

 429

 432

 428

 409

 405

 415

 401

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 18, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 317

 310

 322

 348

 324

 321

 325

 302

 301

 300

 292

 298

 298

 301

 296

 290

 291

 261

 265

 301

 282

 271

 291

 281

 283

 281

 269

 266

 272

 264

TOTAL 13,500

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dental Patient Care America,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Brad Berrett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Brad Berrett
-------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2006
### §1521. Retaliating against a Federal judge or Federal law enforcement officer by false claim or slander of title

Whoever files, attempts to file, or conspires to file, in any public record or in any private record which is generally available to the public, any false lien or encumbrance against the real or personal property of an individual described in section 1114, on account of the performance of official duties by that individual, knowing or having reason to know that such lien or encumbrance is false or contains any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both.

(Added Pub. L. 110–177, title II, §201(a), Jan. 7, 2008, 121 Stat. 2535.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheets and statements of operations found on pages F-3 and F-4 of the
Company's Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1996, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          13,581
<SECURITIES>                                   247,548
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,089,955
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,415,903
<PP&E>                                         530,034
<DEPRECIATION>                                (326,554)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,219,874
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          486,247
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            71
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,733,556
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,219,874
<SALES>                                      1,710,898
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,710,898
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,750,536
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (2,614)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,811,522)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,812,322)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
# C_2015236EN.01001801.xml

| 20.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 May 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — Proceedings brought by Kansaneläkelaitos

(Case C-269/14) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Public procurement - Directive 2004/18/EC - Article 1(4) - Service concession - Definition - Aggregation of contracts between a social security authority and taxi companies providing for an electronic scheme for direct reimbursement of transport costs of insured persons and a system of booking journeys))

(2015/C 236/24)

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Referring court

Korkein hallinto-oikeus

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Kansaneläkelaitos

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1(4) of Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, must be interpreted as meaning that an aggregation of contracts, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, may be considered to constitute a ‘service concession’, within the meaning of that provision, provided that the contracting authority has transferred the entirety of, or a significant share of, the risk which it bears in relation to the economic exploitation of the services; this being a matter which must be determined by the referring court taking into account all the inherent characteristics of the services covered by that aggregation of contracts.

---

(1)  OJ C 261, 11.8.2014.

1

---
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

In re:

 

Bluepoint Medical Associates, LLC Case No. 19-13121-KHK

 Chapter 11

Debtor

 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9010, John C. Morgan of the 

law firm of NEW DAY LEGAL, PLLC hereby enters his appearance in this matter as counsel 

for Wisteria 12810, LLC.

REQUEST IS HEREBY MADE that all notices given or required to be given in this case 

and all papers, pleadings and motions, served or required to be served in this case shall be 

directed to the undersigned, whose office address, telephone, and facsimile numbers are set forth 

below.

WISTERIA 12810, LLC

By Counsel

/s/ John C. Morgan

John C. Morgan, Esquire, VSB # 30148

Scott W. Carpenter, Esquire, VSB # 89057

Suad Bektic, Esquire, VSB # 90012

NEW DAY LEGAL, PLLC

98 Alexandria Pike, Suite 10

Warrenton, Virginia 20186

(540) 349-3232

FAX: (888) 612-0943

Counsel for the Debtor

Case 19-13121-KHK Doc 37 Filed 10/23/19 Entered 10/23/19 14:57:26 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have sent by ECF, or caused to be mailed, a true copy of the 

foregoing Notice of Appearance to the following this 23rd day of October 2019.

Office of the United States Trustee

1725 Duke Street, Suite 650

Alexandria, VA 22314

John T. Donelan, Esquire

125 South Royal Street

Alexandria, VA 22314

Counsel for the Debtor

 /s/ John C. Morgan

 John C. Morgan

Case 19-13121-KHK Doc 37 Filed 10/23/19 Entered 10/23/19 14:57:26 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 969

 954

 918

 965

 1,021

 1,163

 1,128

 1,123

 1,047

 1,078

 831

 807

 867

 914

 1,007

 1,055

 1,111

 1,156

 1,146

 1,156

 1,171

 1,152

 1,175

 1,188

 1,023

 1,023

 988

 948

 962

 1,000

 967

 581

 557

 550

 531

 542

 554

 545

 561

 553

 511

 497

 470

 427

 404

 412

 384

 377

 364

 356

 340

 339

 348

 342

 356

 368

 345

 347

 341

 329

 317

 313

 720

 680

 635

 667

 672

 791

 856

 837

 705

 678

 630

 587

 572

 565

 607

 602

 577

 564

 498

 535

 561

 561

 713

 686

 602

 555

 565

 546

 486

 501

 464

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE:April 1, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 461

 436

 408

 428

 431

 505

 545

 533

 452

 435

 405

 379

 369

 365

 391

 388

 373

 365

 324

 347

 363

 363

 457

 440

 388

 359

 365

 353

 316

 326

 303

TOTAL 19,218

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT HEADWORKS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 511

 509

 511

 565

 555

 549

 535

 536

 531

 556

 572

 633

 650

 617

 650

 641

 642

 719

 738

 713

 729

 733

 740

 723

 756

 763

 734

 736

 722

 696

 415

 426

 444

 441

 451

 430

 429

 439

 451

 470

 468

 478

 493

 506

 510

 538

 556

 582

 579

 536

 537

 581

 591

 656

 692

 682

 670

 643

 608

 597

 457

 469

 475

 488

 488

 494

 483

 492

 499

 517

 521

 549

 559

 563

 578

 585

 605

 628

 646

 656

 656

 668

 697

 698

 718

 716

 700

 688

 671

 662

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 15, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 298

 306

 310

 318

 318

 321

 314

 320

 324

 336

 338

 355

 361

 364

 373

 378

 390

 404

 415

 421

 421

 429

 447

 447

 460

 458

 449

 441

 431

 425

TOTAL 17,626

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
IT CAN BE HARD TO GET HIS ATTENTION.

While you’re dropping off your child, discuss a plan to help him avoid 

alcohol and other drugs.

Talk with your children about what to do if they are faced with a decision 

about alcohol and other drugs, such as texting a code word to a family member. Practice the exit 

plan in a safe environment. For tips on how—and when—to begin the conversation, visit: 

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

SMA-18-5086PSTCRD
#### § 463.110 What are the program-specific requirements in the Unified State Plan for the adult, dislocated worker, and youth programs authorized under Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act title I?

The program-specific requirements for the adult, dislocated worker, and youth programs that must be included in the Unified State Plan are described in sec. 102(b)(2)(D) of WIOA. Additional planning requirements may be explained in joint planning guidelines issued by the Secretaries of Labor and Education.
#### § 463.165 May a State establish additional indicators of performance?

States may identify additional indicators of performance for the six core programs. If a State does so, these indicators must be included in the Unified or Combined State Plan.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 15,555

 16,227

 18,359

 17,392

 16,162

 12,639

 11,487

 8,969

 7,574

 6,910

 10,750

 6,828

 4,386

 1,818

 403

 2,735

 520

 373

 393

 365

 356

 248

 256

 237

 240

 239

 275

 242

 293

 347

 310

 5,639

 7,779

 7,103

 4,499

 4,439

 2,733

 2,184

 1,047

 689

 395

 786

 1,031

 336

 239

 178

 155

 151

 167

 179

 181

 190

 180

 188

 177

 178

 179

 175

 171

 182

 197

 224

 10,743

 11,181

 12,192

 11,304

 9,751

 7,924

 6,188

 4,702

 4,032

 3,555

 5,077

 3,636

 1,609

 719

 293

 418

 222

 220

 267

 238

 243

 212

 212

 207

 202

 205

 205

 199

 215

 245

 258

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 6, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 57 (Thursday, March 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 16638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6899]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

[FWS-R9-EA-2011-N050; 81331-1334-8TWG-W4]


Wildlife and Hunting Heritage Conservation Council 
Teleconference; Cancellation

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of teleconference; cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce our 
cancellation of a public teleconference of the Wildlife and Hunting 
Heritage Conservation Council (Council). The teleconference was to have 
taken place on March 23, 2011. When we reschedule the teleconference, 
we will announce the new date and time to the public.

DATES: The teleconference was scheduled to be held March 23, 2011. We 
will reschedule the teleconference at a later date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua Winchell, Council Coordinator, 
4401 N. Fairfax Dr., Mailstop 3103-AEA, Arlington, VA 22203; (703) 358-
2639 (phone); (703) 358-2548 (fax); or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8c2c7dbc0ddc9f7dfc1c6cbc0cdc4c4e8cedfdb86cfc7de"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e18b8e92899480be96888f8289848d8da1879692cf868e97">[email protected]</span></a> (e-
mail).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the requirements of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., the Council was formed 
in February 2010, to provide advice about wildlife and habitat 
conservation endeavors. For more information about the Council, see our 
March 4, 2011, Federal Register notice (76 FR 12130), or contact Joshua 
Winchell, Council Coordinator (FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). 
Background information on the Council is also available at http://www.fws.gov/whhcc.
    In a Federal Register notice published on March 4, 2011, we 
announced a Council teleconference to take place on March 23, 2011. 
However, we now announce that we must cancel that teleconference. We 
plan to reschedule the teleconference. When we reschedule, we will 
announce the new date and time in a new notice in the Federal Register. 
Primary objectives and agenda items of the teleconference will remain 
the same.

    Dated: March 14, 2011.
Rowan W. Gould,
Acting Director.
[FR Doc. 2011-6899 Filed 3-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 371.13 How does the Secretary determine funding priorities?

The Secretary shall conduct a survey of the governing bodies of Indian tribes funded under this part regarding training and technical assistance needs in order to determine funding priorities for such training and technical assistance.

(Authority: Sections 12(c) and Section 121(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 741(c))
First Amendment to Trust Agreement



 Exhibit 10.2 
 First Amendment to the Trust Agreement for the Amended and Restated Bowater 
 Incorporated Benefit
Plan Grantor Trust, Effective June 6, 2000 
 This First Amendment to the
Trust Agreement for the Amended and Restated Bowater Incorporated Benefit Plan Grantor Trust, effective June 6, 2000, is made as of the 27th day of
June 2007, by Bowater Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, the Company previously established the Amended and Restated Bowater Incorporated Benefit Plan Grantor Trust effective June 6, 2000,
(the “Trust”) to serve as a funding vehicle for certain designated non-qualified benefit plans, agreements and arrangements as set forth in the Trust Agreement (the “Trust Agreement”) dated June 6, 2000 by and between the
Company and Wachovia Bank, N.A., a national banking association organized and existing under the laws of the United States (the “Trustee”); and 
 WHEREAS, Article X of the Trust Agreement reserves to the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) the right to amend the Trust Agreement and the Trust created thereby; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board now desires to amend the Trust Agreement as set forth herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Trust Agreement is amended, effective as of the date of delivery to the trustee, Wachovia Bank, N.A., of this executed
Amendment, accompanied by a certified copy of the resolutions of the Board authorizing this Amendment, as follows: 
 Section 1.2(h)(a)
of the Trust Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 
  

	 	(a)	The date that any Person is or becomes an Acquiring Person; provided, however, that for purposes of this subsection (a), a Change in Control will not be deemed to occur if the
accumulation of 20% or more of the combined voting power of the Corporation’s then outstanding securities which would result in such Person being or becoming an Acquiring Person is pursuant to a merger, consolidation or reorganization, or sale
or other transfer, that would not result in a Change in Control under subsections (b) or (c) immediately following this subsection (a). 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to the Trust Agreement for
the Amended and Restated Bowater Incorporated Benefit Plan Grantor Trust, effective June 6, 2000, to be executed by its duly authorized officer, this 13th day of July, 2007. 
  

			
	BOWATER INCORPORATED
		
	By:	 	


		 	James T. Wright
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President – Human Resources
§ 34.29 Enforcement action against employer for noncompliance with garnishment order. ( a ) If an employer fails to comply with § 34.22 to withhold an appropriate amount from wages owed and payable to an employee, we may sue the employer for that amount.
( b ) ( 1 ) We do not file suit under paragraph (a) of this section before we terminate action to enforce the debt as a personal liability of the debtor.
( 2 ) However, the provision of paragraph (b)(1) of this section may not apply if earlier filing of a suit is necessary to avoid expiration of any applicable statute of limitations.
( c ) ( 1 ) For purposes of this section, termination of an action to enforce a debt occurs when we terminate collection action in accordance with the FCCS, other applicable standards, or paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
( 2 ) We regard termination of the collection action to have occurred if we have not received for one year any payments to satisfy the debt, in whole or in part, from the particular debtor whose wages were subject to garnishment.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3720D)
§ 463.34 What are workforce preparation activities? Workforce preparation activities include activities, programs, or services designed to help an individual acquire a combination of basic academic skills, critical thinking skills, digital literacy skills, and self-management skills, including competencies in: ( a ) Utilizing resources;
( b ) Using information;
( c ) Working with others;
( d ) Understanding systems;
( e ) Skills necessary for successful transition into and completion of postsecondary education or training, or employment; and
( f ) Other employability skills that increase an individual's preparation for the workforce.
(Authority: 29 U.S.C. 3272(17); P.L. 111-340)
Order entered July 23, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00389-CV

IN RE CHARLES ANTHONY ALLEN, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV99-01573-V

ORDER

Before the Court is relator’s pleading, which he styles a petition for bill of review, in 

which relator challenges this Court’s order dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus for 

want of jurisdiction. A bill of review, or a petition in the nature of a bill of review, is a 

proceeding in equity for the purpose of setting aside a prior judgment of the trial court. Fender 

v. Moss, 629 S.W.2d 192, 194 (Tex. App.—Dallas), writ refused n.r.e., 637 S.W.2d 922 (Tex. 

1982); TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(f) (“On expiration of the time within which the trial court has 

plenary power, a judgment cannot be set aside by the trial court except by bill of review for 

sufficient cause, filed within the time allowed by law.”). There is no comparable procedure for 

an out of time attack on the judgment of an appellate court.1 Because this court’s plenary power

over the order relator complains of has expired, TEX. R. APP. P. 19.1(a), even if relator’s bill of 

 

1 Motions for rehearing in original proceedings must be filed within 15 days after the final order is rendered. TEX. R.

APP. P. 52.9. Relator did not file a timely motion for rehearing.
review presented valid reasons for reconsidering its decision, this Court would have no power to 

set aside its order dismissing realtor’s petition for writ of habeas corpus for want of jurisdiction. 

See Cadle Co. v. Lobingier, 50 S.W.3d 662, 671 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2001, pet. denied). 

We DISMISS relator’s bill of review.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
§ 361.440 When may a fee be charged for the business services in this subpart? ( a ) There is no requirement that a fee-for-service be charged to employers.
( b ) No fee may be charged for services provided in § 361.435(a).
( c ) A fee may be charged for services provided under § 361.435(b) and (c). Services provided under § 361.435(c) may be provided through effective business intermediaries working in conjunction with the Local WDB and may also be provided on a fee-for-service basis or through the leveraging of economic development, philanthropic, and other public and private resources in a manner determined appropriate by the Local WDB. The Local WDB may examine the services provided compared with the assets and resources available within the local one-stop delivery system and through its partners to determine an appropriate cost structure for services, if any.
( d ) Any fees earned are recognized as program income and must be expended by the partner in accordance with the partner program's authorizing statute, implementing regulations, and Federal cost principles identified in Uniform Guidance.