alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Joseph James Craver, Appellant

No. 06-19-00101-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 71st District Court of 

Harrison County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 16-

0317X). Memorandum Opinion delivered 

by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess

and Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Joseph James Craver, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JANUARY 17, 2020

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Order entered January 2, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00921-CR

JOSHUA PAUL WASHBURN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1161795-Y

ORDER

The Court GRANTS the State’s December 27, 2013 second motion for extension of time 

to file the State’s brief.

We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file the brief tendered as of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
§ 263.5 What are the application requirements? An applicant must— ( a ) Describe how it will— ( 1 ) Recruit qualified Indian individuals, such as students who may not be of traditional college age, to become teachers, principals, or school leaders;
( 2 ) Use funds made available under the grant to support the recruitment, preparation, and professional development of Indian teachers or principals in LEAs that serve a high proportion of Indian students; and
( 3 ) Assist participants in meeting the payback requirements under § 263.9(b);
( b ) Submit one or more letters of support from LEAs that serve a high proportion of Indian students. Each letter must include— ( 1 ) A statement that the LEA agrees to consider program graduates for employment;
( 2 ) Evidence that the LEA meets the definition of “LEA that serves a high proportion of Indian students”; and
( 3 ) The signature of an authorized representative of the LEA;
( c ) If applying as an Indian organization, demonstrate that the entity meets the definition of “Indian organization”;
( d ) If it is an affected LEA that is subject to the requirements of section 8538 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA), consult with appropriate officials from Tribe(s) or Tribal organizations approved by the Tribes located in the area served by the LEA prior to its submission of an application, as required under ESEA section 8538; and
( e ) Comply with any other requirements in the application package.
[85 FR 41378, June 10, 2020]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 627

 624

 584

 596

 587

 573

 573

 561

 548

 552

 539

 552

 562

 574

 584

 615

 608

 654

 655

 671

 689

 736

 764

 772

 771

 767

 730

 683

 677

 686

 490

 451

 486

 501

 455

 416

 406

 412

 428

 468

 482

 481

 499

 532

 522

 543

 572

 563

 558

 634

 626

 669

 687

 764

 767

 735

 683

 673

 674

 678

 587

 539

 535

 544

 530

 512

 510

 505

 500

 518

 517

 514

 524

 554

 551

 572

 596

 614

 610

 643

 662

 700

 716

 769

 769

 758

 700

 677

 676

 682

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 6, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 379

 349

 347

 352

 344

 332

 331

 328

 325

 336

 336

 334

 340

 358

 357

 369

 384

 395

 393

 413

 425

 449

 458

 491

 491

 484

 449

 434

 434

 437

TOTAL 18,084

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 25, 2013

s1118

Order 

Clerk

November 25, 2013

147097 & (58)(59)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147097

COA: 306796

Kalamazoo CC: 2008-000570-FC

ANTHONY JUAN ALLEN,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to add issues is GRANTED. The application for 

leave to appeal the March 26, 2013 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and 

it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be 

reviewed by this Court. The motion to remand is DENIED.
- Newsroom        - Press Releases
      - Public Statements
      - Speeches
      - Testimony
      - Spotlight Topics
      - Media Gallery
      - Upcoming Events
      - Webcasts
      - What's New
      - SEC Videos
      - Reports and Publications
      - RSS Feeds
      - Social Media 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting; Cancellation

**FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT**: To Be Published

**PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING**:  Wednesday, October 23, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.

**CHANGES IN THE MEETING**: The Open Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, October 23, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., has been cancelled and is expected to be rescheduled for a date in November 2019.

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION**: For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated:  October 18, 2019

Vanessa A. CountrymanSecretary
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

GREGORY D. FLOYD, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3828

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 28, 2018. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, 

Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, CRENSHAW, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
431 P.2d 71

#### STATE of New Mexico, ex rel. MOUNTAIN STATES MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, a corporation, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Richard A. STANLEY, Judge of the District Court of the Third Judicial District of the State of New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 8464.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Sept. 13, 1967.

CHAVEZ, Chief Justice, and COMP,TON and CARMODY, Justices, concur-,xing.

Ordered that the alternative writ of prohibition heretofore issued herein oh June .28, 1967,. be and the same is hereby quashed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet of SunGard Data Systems Inc. as of December 31, 1999
and the consolidated statement of income for the twelve months ended December
31, 1999, both included in the Form 10-K of SunGard Data Systems Inc. for the
twelve months ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         286,990
<SECURITIES>                                   104,235
<RECEIVABLES>                                  368,543
<ALLOWANCES>                                    34,141
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               786,807
<PP&E>                                         501,087
<DEPRECIATION>                                 318,405
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,564,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          348,478
<BONDS>                                          5,517
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,285
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,209,482
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,564,762
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,444,501
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  858,572<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                99,184<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,321
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                190,456
<INCOME-TAX>                                   117,306
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            100,531<F3>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 10,670<F4>
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   111,201<F3>
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.88<F5>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.85<F5>
<FN>
<F1>Excludes selling, marketing and administration costs, and merger costs.
<F2>Merger costs.
<F3>Represents pro forma net income due to pro forma income taxes resulting from
a pooling of interests with a Subchapter S corporation.
<F4>After-tax gains on sale of two subsidiaries and debt extinguishment.
<F5>Includes merger costs totaling $0.56 per pro forma basic share and $0.55 per
pro forma diluted share, and extraordinary gains on sale of two subsidiaries
and debt extinguishment totaling $0.08 per pro forma share.
</FN>


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

)

In re ) Chapter 11

)

DARRALL A GRIFFIN, ) Case No. 16-13433-BFK

)

					Debtor(s) ) BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

) BRIAN F KENNEY

REQUEST OF PRA RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT, LLC

FOR SERVICE OF NOTICES PURSUANT TO FED. R. BANKR. P. 2002(g)

				PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that PRA Receivables Management, LLC, as authorized agent for Synchrony

Bank (Oreck [Last four digit of account:1876]), a creditor in the above-captioned chapter 11 case,

requests, pursuant to Rules 2002 and 9007 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the Bankruptcy

Rules) and sections 102(1), 342 and 1109(b) of title 11 of the United States Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101, et seq.

(as amended, the Bankruptcy Code), that all notices given or required to be given and all papers served or

required to be served in this case be also given to and served, whether electronically or otherwise, on: 

Synchrony Bank

c/o PRA Receivables Management, LLC

PO Box 41021

Norfolk, VA 23541

Telephone: (877) 829-8298

Facsimile: (757) 351-3257

E-mail: claims@recoverycorp.com

Dated: Norfolk, Virginia

October 17, 2016

By: /s/ Valerie Smith

Valerie Smith

c/o PRA Receivables Management, LLC

Senior Manager

PO Box 41021

Norfolk, VA 23541

(877) 829-8298

Assignee Creditor: Oreck [Last four digit of account:1876]

Case 16-13433-BFK Doc 12 Filed 10/17/16 Entered 10/17/16 19:22:33 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
# Official Journal L 458I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 458I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6423 December 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 458I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6423 December 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2311 of 22 December 2021 amending for the 324th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2311 of 22 December 2021 amending for the 324th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Clancy Systems International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Lizabeth M. Wolfson, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted
pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

	(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

/s/  Lizabeth M. Wolfson
_______________________
Chief Financial Officer
December 22, 2006





<PAGE>


[00000-0000/DOCUMENT.01]	-5-	10/6/98

[00000-0000/DOCUMENT.01]		10/6/98
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-50260

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MANUEL RIOJAS MUNOZ, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-93-CR-136-3

--------------------

December 3,2001

Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Manuel Riojas Munoz, Jr., federal prisoner #65177-080, has

filed a letter disputing the applicability of the certificate-ofappealability (COA) requirement to his appeal from the denial of

a petition for a writ of coram nobis. Because Munoz is appealing

the denial of coram nobis relief under 28 U.S.C. § 1651, he does

not need a COA in order for his appeal to proceed. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1). To the extent his letter requests a waiver of the

COA requirement, his request is DENIED AS UNNECESSARY. We

conclude, however, that the district court properly denied
No. 01-50260

-2-

Munoz’s petition for a writ of coram nobis given that he is still

in custody for his offenses of conviction. See United States v.

Hatten, 167 F.3d 884, 887 n.6 (5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, we

dispense with any further briefing and DISMISS his appeal as

FRIVOLOUS. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1245

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1245 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and 68 FR 10357, Mar. 5, 2003.

#### § 1245.5 Medical examination.

Pursuant to section 232(b) of the Act, an applicant for adjustment of status shall be required to have a medical examination by a designated civil surgeon, whose report setting forth the findings of the mental and physical condition of the applicant, including compliance with section 212(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Act, shall be incorporated into the record. A medical examination shall not be required of an applicant for adjustment of status who entered the United States as a nonimmigrant spouse, fianceé, or fianceeé of a United States citizen or the child of such an alien as defined in section 101(a)(15)(K) of the Act and § 214.2(k) of 8 CFR chapter I if the applicant was medically examined prior to, and as a condition of, the issuance of the nonimmigrant visa; provided that the medical examination must have occurred not more than 1 year prior the date of application for adjustment of status. Any applicant certified under paragraphs (1)(A)(ii) or (1)(A)(iii) of section 212(a) of the Act may appeal to a Board of Medical Officers of the U.S. Public Health Service as provided in section 234 of the Act and part 1235 of this chapter.

[56 FR 49841, Oct. 2, 1991, as amended at 62 FR 10384, Mar. 6, 1997; 66 FR 42595, Aug. 14, 2001]
§ 200.8 Assessment reports. ( a ) *Student reports.* A State's academic assessment system must produce individual student interpretive, descriptive, and diagnostic reports that— ( 1 ) ( i ) Include information regarding achievement on the academic assessments under § 200.2 measured against the State's student academic achievement standards; and
( ii ) Help parents, teachers, and principals to understand and address the specific academic needs of students; and
( 2 ) Are provided to parents, teachers, and principals— ( i ) As soon as is practicable after the assessment is given; and
( ii ) In an understandable and uniform format, consistent with § 200.2(e).
( b ) *Itemized score analyses for LEAs and schools.* ( 1 ) A State's academic assessment system must produce and report to LEAs and schools itemized score analyses, consistent with § 200.2(b)(13), so that parents, teachers, principals, and administrators can interpret and address the specific academic needs of students.
( 2 ) The requirement to report itemized score analyses in paragraph (b)(1) of this section does not require the release of test items.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1810-0576) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3, 3474, 6311(b)(2)(B)(x) and (xii), and 6571)
[67 FR 45042, July 5, 2002, as amended at 81 FR 88938, Dec. 8, 2016]
#### HELLENIC LINES, LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. The EMBASSY OF SOUTH VIET NAM, COMMERICAL DIVISION, and the Republic of South Viet Nam, Defendants.

No. 67 Civ. 860.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Dec. 1, 1967.

Renato C. Giallorenzi, New York City, for plaintiff.

Nixon, Mudge Rose Guthrie & Alexander, New York City, for defendants. Arthur M. Becker and Ronnie A. Yoder, New York City, of counsel.

MEMORANDUM

EDELSTEIN, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Hellenic Lines, Limited, filed a complaint on March 1, 1967, in this court complaining that defendants, The Embassy of South Viet Nam, Commercial Division, and the Republic of South Viet Nam, are liable to plaintiff for delay in unloading plaintiff’s vessel on a shipment of commodities which arrived in Saigon. In order to obtain jurisdiction over the defendants, plaintiff caused a process of maritime attachment and garnishment to ,be issued. The garnishee, First National City Bank, stated in its amended answer to the process of maritime attachment and garnishment,1 filed April 10, 1967, that a time deposit in excess of $128,510.90 was maintained at the bank in the name of Banque Nationale du Viet Nam. The United States Attorney, at the direction of the Attorney General, pursuant to a request by the Secretary of State, filed, on August 8, 1967, a suggestion of immunity from suit and from execution or attachment. This is a motion for an order vacating the process of maritime attachment and' garnishment, dissolving the attachment and dismissing the action. The doctrine of sovereign immunity clearly applicable to the case at bar impels to the granting of the motion:

> “That principle is that courts may not so exercise their jurisdiction, by the *861seizure and detention of the property of a friendly sovereign, as to embarrass the executive arm of the government in conducting foreign relations. 'In such cases the judicial department of this government follows the action of the political branch and will not embarrass the latter by assuming an antagonistic jurisdiction.’ United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196, 209, 1 S.Ct. 240, 251, 27 L.Ed. 171.” Ex Parte Republic of Peru, 318 U.S. 578, 588, 63 S.Ct. 793, 87 L.Ed. 1014 (1943).

See also New York & Cuba Mail S. S. Co. v. Republic of Korea, 132 F.Supp. 684 (S.D.N.Y.1955). The cases cited by plaintiff in its memorandum are so patently inapposite to the situation at hand as to make any further discussion unnecessary.

This motion is granted.

Settle order on notice.

1

. The process of maritime attachment and garnishment was served on the bank on March 2, 1967. On March 15, 1967, the bank answered the process by stating that it neither was indebted to nor held property of either named defendant. Plaintiff sent the bank a letter dated April 3, 1967, which specified the Banque Nationale du Viet Nam and Credit Commercial du Viet Nam as having accounts at the bank which belong to the named defendants. The bank then filed its amended answer to the process.
### **CHAPTER 61—LOTTERIES**

Sec.
1301.
Importing or transporting lottery tickets.
1302.
Mailing lottery tickets or related matter.
1303.
Postmaster or employee as lottery agent.
1304.
Broadcasting lottery information.
1305.
Fishing contests.
1306.
Participation by financial institutions.
1307.
Exceptions relating to certain advertisements and other information and to State-conducted lotteries.
1308.
Limitation of applicability.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2014**—Pub. L. 113–251, §4(b), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2890, added item 1308.

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–625, §3(a)(2), Nov. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 3206, substituted "Exceptions relating to certain advertisements and other information and to State-conducted lotteries" for "State-conducted lotteries" in item 1307.

**1975**—Pub. L. 93–583, §2, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1916, added item 1307.

**1967**—Pub. L. 90–203, §5(b), Dec. 15, 1967, 81 Stat. 611, added item 1306.

**1950**—Act Aug. 16, 1950, ch. 722, §2, 64 Stat. 452, added item 1305.

**1949**—Act May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §33, 63 Stat. 94, substituted "as" for "at" in item 1303.
§ 390.3 What regulations apply to this program? ( a ) 34 CFR part 385 (Rehabilitation Training); and
( b ) The regulations in this part 390.
(Authority: Section 302 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 772)
Seventh Amendment to the Company's 401(k) SMART Plan



 Exhibit 4.10 
 SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE 
 2001 AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC. 
 401(k)
SMART PLAN 
 THIS SEVENTH AMENDMENT to the 2001 Amended and Restated
Publix Super Markets, Inc. 401(k) SMART Plan is adopted this 9th day of November, 2005, by Publix Super Markets, Inc. (the “Company”), but is
effective as provided hereafter. 
 W I T N E S S E T H: 

 WHEREAS, the Company has previously adopted the Publix Super Markets, Inc. 401(k) SMART Plan, which has been amended and restated
from time to time (as amended and restated to date, the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Plan, the
Company is authorized and empowered to amend the Plan further; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company deems it advisable and in the best interest
of the Participants to amend the Plan further in certain respects. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

 1. Section 8.3(b) of the Plan is amended by adding the following as a new subparagraph (5), effective January 1, 2006:

 (5) Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Participant who is an Employee of the Company on December 31, 2005, and who
becomes an employee of the Publix Employees Federal Credit Union as of January 1, 2006, shall have a Vested Interest in his Matching Contributions Account of one hundred percent (100%) as of January 1, 2006. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Seventh Amendment to be executed this
9th day of November, 2005, by its duly authorized officers. 
  

									
	ATTEST:	 		 	PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC.
			
	(CORPORATE SEAL)	 		 	
					
	By:	 	/s/ John A. Attaway, Jr.	 		 	By:	 	/s/ William E. Crenshaw
		 	John A. Attaway, Jr., Secretary	 		 		 	William E. Crenshaw, President
					
		 		 		 		 	“COMPANY”