alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 222.5 When may a local educational agency amend its application? ( a ) An LEA may amend its application following any of the events described in § 222.3(b)(1) by submitting a written request to the Secretary and a copy to its SEA no later than the earlier of the following events: ( 1 ) The 60th day following the applicable event.
( 2 ) By June 30 of the Federal fiscal year preceding the fiscal year for which the LEA seeks assistance.
( b ) The LEA also may amend its application based on actual data regarding eligible Federal properties or federally connected children if— ( 1 ) Those data were not available at the time the LEA filed its application (*e.g.,* due to a second membership count of students) and are acceptable to the Secretary; and
( 2 ) The LEA submits a written request to the Secretary with a copy to its SEA no later than the end of the Federal fiscal year preceding the fiscal year for which the LEA seeks assistance.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7705)
[80 FR 33162, June 11, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 64741, Sept. 20, 2016]
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
of Starwood Hotels & Resorts and Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. (the
"Company") on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-13411 and 333-13325) of our report dated
February 27, 1998 on our audits of the separate and combined financial
statements of the Company as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 1997, which report is included in
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P.

Phoenix, Arizona
March 31, 1998
# Official Journal C 169/22 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 169 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5822 May 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 169

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5822 May 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 169/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 169/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
### §353. Leases

The Secretary of the Interior may, in his discretion, execute leases to parcels of ground not exceeding twenty acres in extent for periods not to exceed twenty years whenever such ground is necessary for the erection of establishments for the accommodation of visitors; may grant such other necessary privileges and concessions as he deems wise for the accommodation of visitors; and may likewise arrange for the removal of such mature or dead or down timber as he may deem necessary and advisable for the protection and improvement of the park.

(Feb. 26, 1917, ch. 121, §7, 39 Stat. 939; May 21, 1928, ch. 654, §1, 45 Stat. 622.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1928—Act May 21, 1928, repealed provision that no appropriation for the maintenance of the park in excess of $10,000 annually should be made unless expressly authorized by law.
### §1367. Interference with the operation of a satellite

(a) Whoever, without the authority of the satellite operator, intentionally or maliciously interferes with the authorized operation of a communications or weather satellite or obstructs or hinders any satellite transmission shall be fined in accordance with this title or imprisoned not more than ten years or both.

(b) This section does not prohibit any lawfully authorized investigative, protective, or intelligence activity of a law enforcement agency or of an intelligence agency of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 99–508, title III, §303(a), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1872.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 90 days after Oct. 21, 1986, and, in case of conduct pursuant to court order or extension, applicable only with respect to court orders and extensions made after such date, with special rule for State authorizations of interceptions, see section 302 of Pub. L. 99–508, set out as a note under section 3121 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 397

 389

 389

 388

 388

 385

 398

 373

 385

 378

 411

 426

 418

 419

 442

 458

 446

 458

 490

 492

 467

 436

 463

 512

 514

 496

 519

 537

 537

 550

 560

 331

 312

 305

 315

 305

 308

 314

 315

 319

 333

 357

 384

 378

 391

 399

 419

 403

 403

 401

 469

 430

 430

 436

 466

 491

 487

 497

 522

 530

 530

 551

 361

 337

 337

 341

 346

 343

 352

 345

 353

 361

 390

 409

 395

 406

 421

 435

 422

 439

 435

 487

 448

 432

 446

 493

 504

 490

 507

 533

 533

 541

 556

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 25, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 239

 224

 224

 227

 230

 228

 234

 229

 234

 239

 257

 269

 260

 267

 276

 285

 277

 287

 285

 317

 293

 283

 292

 321

 327

 319

 329

 345

 345

 350

 360

TOTAL 13,198

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
### **CHAPTER 121—STORED WIRE AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND TRANSACTIONAL RECORDS ACCESS**

Sec.
2701.
Unlawful access to stored communications.
2702.
Voluntary disclosure of customer communications or records.
2703.
Required disclosure of customer communications or records.
2704.
Backup preservation.
2705.
Delayed notice.
2706.
Cost reimbursement.
2707.
Civil action.
2708.
Exclusivity of remedies.
2709.
Counterintelligence access to telephone toll and transactional records.
2710.
Wrongful disclosure of video tape rental or sale records.
2711.
Definitions for chapter.
2712.
Civil actions against the United States.
2713.
Required preservation and disclosure of communications and records.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–141, div. V, §103(a)(2), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1214, added item 2713.

**2002**—Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, §4005(b), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1812, made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 107–56, title II, §223(c)(2), Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 295, effective Oct. 26, 2001. See 2001 Amendment note below.

**2001**—Pub. L. 107–56, title II, §§223(c)(2), 224, Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 295, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, §4005(b), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1812, temporarily added item 2712.

Pub. L. 107–56, title II, §§212(a)(2), (b)(2), 224, Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 285, 295, temporarily substituted "Voluntary disclosure of customer communications or records" for "Disclosure of contents" in item 2702 and "Required disclosure of customer communications or records" for "Requirements for governmental access" in item 2703.

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7067, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4405, which directed amendment of item 2710 by inserting "for chapter" after "Definitions" was executed by making the insertion in item 2711 to reflect the probable intent of Congress and the intervening redesignation of item 2710 as 2711 by Pub. L. 100–618, see below.

Pub. L. 100–618, §2(b), Nov. 5, 1988, 102 Stat. 3197, added item 2710 and redesignated former item 2710 as 2711.
The State of



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 8, 2015

N o . 04

- 15

- 00419

- CR

William Horace WALKER

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR1349

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Bar n ar d , Justice

On August 19, 2015, this appeal was dismissed pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d). On

September 3, 2015, appellant filed a pro se letter which this court has construed as a motion for

rehearing. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.1. The motion is DENIED.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 8th day of September, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY

 6,571

 6,807

 6,953

 6,910

 6,842

 7,920

 8,150

 8,182

 8,349

 8,260

 7,320

 6,882

 6,877

 6,869

 6,863

 6,867

 6,877

 7,976

 8,354

 8,335

 8,354

 7,553

 7,344

 7,273

 7,357

 7,367

 7,473

 7,321

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 7,401

 7,702

 7,895

 8,245

 6,033

 5,763

 5,891

 5,019

 6,266

 6,815

 5,553

 4,892

 5,146

 5,037

 4,882

 4,855

 5,276

 4,380

 6,773

 6,335

 5,898

 6,802

 5,993

 5,867

 5,863

 5,885

 5,503

 5,886

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2010 FEDERAL-STATE OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 7, 2010

TOTAL

TOTALS 208,206 0 0

STATE

 6,571

 6,807

 6,953

 6,910

 6,842

 7,920

 8,150

 8,182

 8,349

 8,260

 7,320

 6,882

 6,877

 6,869

 6,863

 6,867

 6,877

 7,976

 8,354

 8,335

 8,354

 7,553

 7,344

 7,273

 7,357

 7,367

 7,473

 7,321

 7,401

 7,702

 7,895

 8,245

 6,033

 5,763

 5,891

 5,019

 6,266

 6,815

 5,553

 4,892

 5,146

 5,037

 4,882

 4,855

 5,276

 4,380

 6,773

 6,335

 5,898

 6,802

 5,993

 5,867

 5,863

 5,885

 5,503

 5,886

 19

 11

 9

 9

 0

 0

 0

 26

 0

 0

 16

 19

 11

 0

 0

 27

 9

 0

 11

 0

 0

 32

 0

 17

 0

 18

 10

 10

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 91

 1,597

 1,953

 1,341

 920

 1,101

 1,516

 460

 504

 650

 331

 947

 790

 596

 729

 854

 490

 1,402

 1,772

 774

 1,916

 365

 483

 516

 853

 1,032

 1,406

 1,196

 167,856

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 91

 1,597

 1,953

 1,341

 920

 1,101

 1,516

 460

 504

 650

 331

 947

 790

 596

 729

 854

 490

 1,402

 1,772

 774

 1,916

 365

 483

 516

 853

 1,032

 1,406

 1,196

FED STATE

TRACY PUMPING

FED TOTAL

DELTA 

PUMPING PLANT

CLIFT

COURT

TOTAL

 7,914

 7,864

 7,861

 7,931

 5,947

 5,935

 5,934

 5,928

 5,922

 5,932

 5,935

 4,954

 4,942

 4,951

 4,946

 4,947

 4,941

 4,939

 5,945

 5,948

 5,941

 6,941

 5,950

 5,927

 5,949

 5,946

 5,944

 5,939

 208,206 168,153 167,856

FED

BANKS

XVC

 0

STATE

DOS

AMIGOS

XVC

 0

BYRON

BETHANY

TOTAL

 254

AQEDUCT CHECK 21

STATE FED TOTAL

DMC-POOL

DEMANDS

 394

 1,019

 894

 793

 437

 944

 633

 928

 1,359

 1,125

 434

 1,305

 1,520

 1,550

 1,830

 2,395

 2,964

 3,802

 3,018

 2,259

 1,906

 2,267

 2,486

 1,801

 2,043

 1,635

 1,347

 1,672

 26,585 0 26,585 44,760

COMMENTS: ALL VALUES IN ACRE-FEET

Table 20 

TOTAL TRACY: Feb 2010 verified with SLDMWA Sheet.
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE
                             SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                            THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Terence Sullivan, certify that:

1       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ATLANTIC
SECURITIES, INC.

 2 Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;

 3 Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this quarterly report;

 4 The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the a registrant is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared;

 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation
(the "Evaluation Date"); and

 (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and

 5 The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

Dated:    August 12, 2004


                                        /s/ Terence Sullivan
                                        --------------------------
                                        Terence Sullivan
                                        Principal Executive Officer
§ 361.305 What is a comprehensive one-stop center and what must be provided there? ( a ) A comprehensive one-stop center is a physical location where job seeker and employer customers can access the programs, services, and activities of all required one-stop partners. A comprehensive one-stop center must have at least one title I staff person physically present.
( b ) The comprehensive one-stop center must provide: ( 1 ) Career services, described in § 361.430;
( 2 ) Access to training services described in 20 CFR 680.200;
( 3 ) Access to any employment and training activities carried out under sec. 134(d) of WIOA;
( 4 ) Access to programs and activities carried out by one-stop partners listed in §§ 361.400 through 361.410, including the Employment Service program authorized under the Wagner-Peyser Act, as amended by WIOA title III (Wagner-Peyser Act Employment Service program); and
( 5 ) Workforce and labor market information.
( c ) Customers must have access to these programs, services, and activities during regular business days at a comprehensive one-stop center. The Local Workforce Development Board (WDB) may establish other service hours at other times to accommodate the schedules of individuals who work on regular business days. The State WDB will evaluate the hours of access to service as part of the evaluation of effectiveness in the one-stop certification process described in § 361.800(b).
( d ) “Access” to each partner program and its services means: ( 1 ) Having a program staff member physically present at the one-stop center;
( 2 ) Having a staff member from a different partner program physically present at the one-stop center appropriately trained to provide information to customers about the programs, services, and activities available through partner programs; or
( 3 ) Making available a direct linkage through technology to program staff who can provide meaningful information or services. ( i ) A “direct linkage” means providing direct connection at the one-stop center, within a reasonable time, by phone or through a real-time Web-based communication to a program staff member who can provide program information or services to the customer.
( ii ) A “direct linkage” cannot exclusively be providing a phone number or computer Web site or providing information, pamphlets, or materials.
( e ) All comprehensive one-stop centers must be physically and programmatically accessible to individuals with disabilities, as described in 29 CFR part 38, the implementing regulations of WIOA sec. 188.
389 P.2d 220

#### George TRUJILLO, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, NEW MEXICO PAROLE BOARD, and The State of New Mexico, Respondents.

No. 50 HC.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Feb. 12, 1964.

COMPTON, Chief Justice, and CARMODY, CHEVEZ, NOBLE and MOISE, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that free process be and the same is hereby granted, and the petition for writ of mandamus be and the same is hereby denied.
# C_2023344EN.01011701.xml

| 29.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/117 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/117

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.11114 – SWOCTEM / KLÖCKNER)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 344/06)

On 22 September 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11114. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M11114. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### Frank Schoenfeldt, Plaintiff in Error, v. Henry Reineck, Defendant in Error.

Gen. No. 15,215.

*Verdicts—when not disturbed as against the evidence.*A verdict will not he set aside as against the evidence unless clearly and manifestly so.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Henry C. Beitler, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1909.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed December 2, 1910.

Rehearing denied December 16, 1910.

Howard E. Leach, for plaintiff in error.

Sullivan & Jarrett, for defendant in error.

Mr. Presiding Justice Mack

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff sued for $75 on an alleged agreement to pay for extras. Defendant denied the agreement and counterclaimed for $22.94 for groceries supplied. A jury was waived; and judgment was rendered in favor of defendant for $22.94 on findings by the court.

No question is raised as to the counterclaim.

Plaintiff was architect and contractor. He was paid in full the contract price for a small building. In digging for the foundation it was found that a neighbor’s house projected on defendant’s ground which plaintiff claimed necessitated a change in the plans; that he told defendant this would cost $75 of which he would stand $25 if the defendant would pay $50 *97and that defendant agreed. Defendant claims that he never so agreed bnt told plaintiff he could have the damages which plaintiff said could be gotten from the neighbor.

While plaintiff is supported by two and defendant by only one witness, we cannot say that the evidence so clearly preponderates in plaintiff’s favor as to justify a reversal.

*Affirmed.*
#### § 303.220 Assurances satisfactory to the Secretary.

Each application must contain assurances satisfactory to the Secretary that the State has met the requirements in §§ 303.221 through 303.227.

(Approved by Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0550)

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1437(b))
# Official Journal L 97/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 97 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6419 March 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 97

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6419 March 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/451 of 17 December 2020 laying down implementing technical standards for the application of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/451 of 17 December 2020 laying down implementing technical standards for the application of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.