alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 335.3 Determination on application; continuance of examination. ( a ) USCIS shall grant the application if the applicant has complied with all requirements for naturalization under this chapter. A decision to grant or deny the application shall be made at the time of the initial examination or within 120-days after the date of the initial examination of the applicant for naturalization under § 335.2. The applicant shall be notified that the application has been granted or denied and, if the application has been granted, of the procedures to be followed for the administration of the oath of allegiance pursuant to part 337 of this chapter.
( b ) Rather than make a determination on the application, USCIS may continue the initial examination on an application for one reexamination, to afford the applicant an opportunity to overcome deficiencies on the application that may arise during the examination. The officer must inform the applicant in writing of the grounds to be overcome or the evidence to be submitted. The applicant shall not be required to appear for a reexamination earlier than 60 days after the first examination. However, the reexamination on the continued case shall be scheduled within the 120-day period after the initial examination, except as otherwise provided under § 312.5(b) of this chapter. If the applicant is unable to overcome the deficiencies in the application, the application shall be denied pursuant to § 336.1 of this chapter.
[56 FR 50497, Oct. 7, 1991, as amended at 58 FR 49914, Sept. 24, 1993; 76 FR 53801, Aug. 29, 2011]
§ 303.702 State use of targets and reporting. ( a ) *General.* Each State must use the targets established in the State's performance plan under § 303.701 and the priority areas described in § 303.700(d) to analyze the performance of each EIS program in implementing part C of the Act.
( b ) *Public reporting and privacy.* ( 1 ) *Public report.* ( i ) Subject to paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, the State must— ( A ) Report annually to the public on the performance of each EIS program located in the State on the targets in the State's performance plan as soon as practicable but no later than 120 days following the State's submission of its annual performance report to the Secretary under paragraph (b)(2) of this section; and
( B ) Make the State's performance plan under § 303.701(a), annual performance reports under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, and the State's annual reports on the performance of each EIS program under paragraph (b)(1)(i)(A) of this section available through public means, including by posting on the Web site of the lead agency, distribution to the media, and distribution to EIS programs.
( ii ) If the State, in meeting the requirements of paragraph (b)(1)(i)(A) of this section, collects data through State monitoring or sampling, the State must include in its public report on EIS programs under paragraph (b)(1)(i)(A) of this section the most recently available performance data on each EIS program and the date the data were collected.
( 2 ) *State performance report.* The State must report annually to the Secretary on the performance of the State under the State's performance plan.
( 3 ) *Privacy.* The State must not report to the public or the Secretary any information on performance that would result in the disclosure of personally identifiable information about individual children, or where the available data are insufficient to yield statistically reliable information.
(Approved by Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0578) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1416(b)(2)(B)-(C), 1442)
###### Editorial Note on Part 635

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 635 appear at 67 FR 75924, Dec. 10, 2002.

#### § 635.118 Payroll and weekly statements.

For all projects, copies of payrolls and statements of wages paid, filed with the State as set forth in the required contract provisions for the project, are to be retained by the State DOT for the time period pursuant to 2 CFR 200.333 for review as needed by the Federal Highway Administration, the Department of Labor, the General Accounting Office, or other agencies.

[56 FR 37004, Aug. 2, 1991, as amended at 85 FR 7293, Nov. 16, 2020]
### §460l–5. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 88–578, title I, §2, Sept. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 897; Pub. L. 89–72, §11, July 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 218; Pub. L. 90–401, §§1(a), 2, July 15, 1968, 82 Stat. 354, 355; Pub. L. 91–308, §2, July 7, 1970, 84 Stat. 410; Pub. L. 91–485, §1, Oct. 22, 1970, 84 Stat. 1084; Pub. L. 94–273, §2(7), Apr. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 375; Pub. L. 94–422, title I, §101(1), Sept. 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 1313; Pub. L. 95–42, §1(1), June 10, 1977, 91 Stat. 210; Pub. L. 100–203, title V, §5201(f)(1), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–267, related to establishment of land and water conservation fund. See section 200302 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
### Nonopaque heavy minerals in sandstone of Jurassic and Cretaceous age in the Black Hills, Wyoming and South Dakota

By: W. J. MapelWayne A. ChisholmRichard E. Bergenback

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1161C

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 10,248

 10,680

 10,145

 8,791

 8,876

 9,030

 8,080

 8,613

 8,672

 9,591

 10,659

 10,925

 12,115

 12,659

 13,652

 13,984

 13,935

 13,713

 13,368

 12,722

 12,196

 10,758

 11,591

 12,564

 13,525

 13,857

 13,827

 13,537

 14,081

 13,605

 13,316

 1,880

 2,256

 2,193

 2,507

 2,577

 2,132

 2,262

 2,702

 2,603

 3,461

 4,380

 3,507

 2,514

 2,277

 2,880

 3,160

 3,667

 3,862

 3,827

 4,167

 4,212

 3,597

 4,237

 4,307

 4,777

 4,884

 4,303

 4,552

 4,954

 4,670

 4,452

 5,502

 5,647

 5,465

 5,474

 5,421

 5,480

 5,398

 5,674

 5,565

 5,937

 6,784

 6,410

 6,627

 6,841

 7,507

 7,809

 8,050

 8,031

 8,004

 8,046

 8,000

 7,469

 7,733

 7,875

 8,672

 9,014

 8,863

 8,898

 9,284

 8,792

 8,633

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D orrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices . C

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 23, 2007 

# Order

January 23, 2007

132179

FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 132179 v COA: 259763 Tuscola CC: 03-021922-CK FARM BUREAU GENE RAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, Defendant-Appellant.

___________________ _________________

AMENDMENT TO ORDER

On order of the Court, the order of January 19, 2007 is am ended to correct
a clerical error in the citation to the statute in the first paragraph th ereof. The citation is
corrected to read as follo ws: “MCL 500.3114(5)(a).”
FILED IN SUPREME COURT 

## OFTEXAS ^ ^ A 0 "2 "?7 

# APR 18 2011 I rUlJ^ BLAKEHAWTHORNE,Clert^ ROGER SLUDER § INTHE DISTRICT COURT 

### Plaintiff, § § 

### V. § 424TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT § 

### CAROL JOYCE OGDEN § Defendant. § OFBLANCO COUNTY,TEXAS ORDER TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION AND ORDER FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 13 OF THE TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE On January 8, 2010, the Court heard the Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 

### 13 of the Texas Rules ofCivil Procedure which was brought by the Defendant, Carole Joyce Ogden. 

### All parties appeared by their attorneys and announced ready. After examining all the pleadings and hearing the evidence and arguments of counsel, the Court finds: 1. that this Court hasjurisdiction of this proceeding; 2. that the Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 13 of the Texas Rules of 

### Civil Procedure filed is in allrespects proper and sufficient; 

### 3. that Plaintiffreceived due and proper notice ofthese proceedings; 4. that Plaintiff, Roger Sluderfiled pleadings in this matterwhich failed to state

a cause of action. Further the Court finds that the Petition filed was 

### groundless, brought in bad faith and brought for the purpose of harassment; 

### 5. that Plaintiff's attorney of record, Richard Wagner, Texas State Bar No.20661050, signed pleadings in this matter which failed to state a

cause of action. Further the Court finds that the Petition filed was 

### groundless, brought in bad faith and brought for the purpose of h9ra«mfln(. DEBBY ELSBURY 

### harassment, clerkdistrictcourtbuncocounty,texas FILED 

### JAN 2 9 2010 

## AT &-AJ qCLQCK ^ $ U BY_

### IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by the Court that: The above numbered Cause No. CV-06875 styled RODGER SLUDER vs. CAROL JOYCE OGDEN is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under the authority of Rule 13 ofthe Texas Rules ofCivil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT: 

### Plaintiff, Roger SluderAND his attorney of recordRichardWagner, will pay to Lawrence B. Shallcross, two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) by cash, money order or cashier's check on or before 5:00 p.m. on January 29, 2010 as an appropriate sanction for attorney fees, pursuant to 215.2(b) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. ALL RELIEF NOT SPECIFICALLY GRANTED HEREIN IS DENIED.



### SIGNED on t) Cnv** /7 . 2010 

# [j^^y?f,

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Lawrence B. Shallcross 

### Attorney forPlaintiffCarole Joyce Ogden 2631 Bulverde Road, Ste. 105 Bulverde, Texas 78163 Tel: (830) 980-5757 Fax: (830) 438-4835 The Honorable Dan H. Mills 

### 424* JUDICIAL DISTRICTCOURT
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10p4


                      1994 HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
                     LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN


                              Second Amendment


                 Houston Industries Incorporated, a Texas corporation (the
"Company"), having established the 1994 Houston Industries Incorporated
Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 1994, and as
thereafter amended, (the "Plan"), and having reserved the right under Section
12.1 thereof to amend the Plan, does hereby amend Section 2.1(e) of the Plan,
effective August 6, 1997, in its entirety to read as follows:

                 "(e)     'Company' means Houston Industries Incorporated, a
         Texas corporation, and any successor thereto."

                 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused these presents to
be executed by its duly authorized officers in a number of copies, all of which
shall constitute one and the same instrument, which may be sufficiently
evidenced by any executed copy hereof, this 26th day of February, 1998, but
effective as of  August 6, 1997.

                                        HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED


                                        By  /s/ LEE W. HOGAN
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           Name:  Lee W. Hogan
                                                ----------------------------
                                           Title: Executive Vice President
                                                 ---------------------------

ATTEST:

/s/ RICHARD B. DAUPHIN
---------------------------------
Assistant Corporate Secretary
### **CHAPTER 113C—TORTURE**

Sec.
2340.
Definitions.
2340A.
Torture.
2340B.
Exclusive remedies.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2002**—Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, §4002(c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1808, repealed Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §601(j)(1), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3501. See 1996 Amendment note below.

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–132, title III, §303(c)(1), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1253, redesignated chapter 113B as 113C. Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §601(j)(1), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3501, which made identical amendment, was repealed by Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, §4002(c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1808, effective Oct. 11, 1996.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION** **1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION** **906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In  connection with the amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of **VisualMED  Clinical Solutions Corp.** (the “Company”) for  the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerard Dab, Principal  Executive Officer, Secretary and a member of the Board of Directors of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|   |   |   |                                                                                                             |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | */s/ Gerald Dab*                                                                                                 |
|   |   |   | Gerard          DabPrincipal Executive Officer, Secretary anda member of the Board of DirectorsFebruary 14, 2006 |

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78r), as amended.

 

----
### §1376. Seizure and forfeiture of cargo

#### (a) Application of consistent provisions

Any vessel or other conveyance subject to the jurisdiction of the United States that is employed in any manner in the unlawful taking of any marine mammal shall have its entire cargo or the monetary value thereof subject to seizure and forfeiture. All provisions of law relating to the seizure, judicial forfeiture, and condemnation of cargo for violation of the customs laws, the disposition of such cargo, and the proceeds from the sale thereof, and the remission or mitigation of any such forfeiture, shall apply with respect to the cargo of any vessel or other conveyance seized in connection with the unlawful taking of a marine mammal insofar as such provisions of law are applicable and not inconsistent with the provisions of this subchapter.

#### (b) Penalties

Any vessel subject to the jurisdiction of the United States that is employed in any manner in the unlawful taking of any marine mammal shall be liable for a civil penalty of not more than $25,000. Such penalty shall be assessed by the district court of the United States having jurisdiction over the vessel. Clearance of a vessel against which a penalty has been assessed, from a port of the United States, may be withheld until such penalty is paid, or until a bond or otherwise satisfactory surety is posted. Such penalty shall constitute a maritime lien on such vessel which may be recovered by action in rem in the district court of the United States having jurisdiction over the vessel.

#### (c) Reward for information leading to conviction

Upon the recommendation of the Secretary, the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to pay an amount equal to one-half of the fine incurred but not to exceed $2,500 to any person who furnishes information which leads to a conviction for a violation of this subchapter. Any officer or employee of the United States or of any State or local government who furnishes information or renders service in the performance of his official duties shall not be eligible for payment under this section.

(Pub. L. 92–522, title I, §106, Oct. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 1036.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the expiration of the sixty-day period following Oct. 21, 1972, see section 4 of Pub. L. 92–522, set out as a note under section 1361 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SINOCUBATE, INC.




/s/ Tom Simeo
Date: November 15, 2011Tom Simeo

Chief Executive Officer and Director
### §1166. Gambling in Indian country

(a) Subject to subsection (c), for purposes of Federal law, all State laws pertaining to the licensing, regulation, or prohibition of gambling, including but not limited to criminal sanctions applicable thereto, shall apply in Indian country in the same manner and to the same extent as such laws apply elsewhere in the State.

(b) Whoever in Indian country is guilty of any act or omission involving gambling, whether or not conducted or sanctioned by an Indian tribe, which, although not made punishable by any enactment of Congress, would be punishable if committed or omitted within the jurisdiction of the State in which the act or omission occurred, under the laws governing the licensing, regulation, or prohibition of gambling in force at the time of such act or omission, shall be guilty of a like offense and subject to a like punishment.

(c) For the purpose of this section, the term "gambling" does not include—

(1) class I gaming or class II gaming regulated by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, or

(2) class III gaming conducted under a Tribal-State compact approved by the Secretary of the Interior under section 11(d)(8) of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act that is in effect.

(d) The United States shall have exclusive jurisdiction over criminal prosecutions of violations of State gambling laws that are made applicable under this section to Indian country, unless an Indian tribe pursuant to a Tribal-State compact approved by the Secretary of the Interior under section 11(d)(8) of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, or under any other provision of Federal law, has consented to the transfer to the State of criminal jurisdiction with respect to gambling on the lands of the Indian tribe.

(Added Pub. L. 100–497, §23, Oct. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 2487.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, referred to in subsec. (c), is Pub. L. 100–497, Oct. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 2467, which enacted sections 1166 to 1168 of this title and chapter 25 (§2701 et seq.) of Title 25, Indians. Section 11(d)(8) of such Act is classified to section 2710(d)(8) of Title 25. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2701 of Title 25 and Tables.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TRX, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 8, 2007



/s/ Norwood H. (Trip) Davis, IIINorwood H. (Trip) Davis, IIIChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ David D. CathcartDavid D. CathcartChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)