alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Q Comm  International,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSBA for the period  ending June 30, 2004 as filed
with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  ("SEC") on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I,  Michael K.  Openshaw,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

         A signed  original of this written  statement  has been provided to the
Company and will be retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its
staff upon request.


/s/ Michael K. Openshaw
-----------------------

Michael K. Openshaw
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)

September 13, 2004

This  certification  accompanies  the  above-described  Report  on Form  10-QSBA
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except
to the extent  required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
FACTORES A CONSIDERAR SOBRE LOS VETERANOS Y MIEMBROS 

DE LAS FUERZAS ARMADAS AL ELEGIR CUÁL BENEFICIO DE LA 

LEY GI USAR

Muchos veteranos y miembros de las fuerzas armadas califican para múltiples beneficios de programas 

de educación, incluyendo:

• Ley GI Post-9/11 (Capítulo 33)

• Ley Montgomery GI-Servicio activo (MGIB-AD, Capítulo 30)

• Ley Montgomery GI - Reserva selecta (MGIB-SR, Capítulo 1606)

• Programa de Asistencia Educacional de Reserva (REAP, Capítulo 1607)

• Programa de Asistencia Educacional a Veteranos (VEAP).

Antes de seleccionar el beneficio de educación de VA más adecuado para una persona 

específica, se deben considerar las siguientes preguntas:

• ¿Qué beneficios pagan más a la persona?

• ¿La persona está recibiendo otra ayuda y dicho derecho cambiará?

• ¿Para cuál nivel de la Ley GI Post-9/11 la persona tiene derecho?

• ¿Qué tanto, si es que lo hay, del entrenamiento será realizado a través del aprendizaje por 

internet/a distancia?

• ¿A dónde se llevará a cabo el entrenamiento?

• ¿Es importante el límite de tiempo para utilizar los beneficios?

• ¿La persona es un miembro de las fuerzas armadas o un veterano?

• ¿Es la persona elegible para la cesión de derechos? ¿La persona desea ceder el derecho?

Las discapacidades que VAdetermina que están relacionadas al servicio militar pueden dar lugar a una remuneración mensual 

no imponible,a la inscripción al sistema de salud de VA, a una preferencia de contratación de 10 puntos para un empleo federal y 

otros beneficios importantes. Pregunte a su representante de VA o a un representante de la Organización de Servicios al Veterano 

sobre compensación por discapacidad, pensión, cuidado de la salud, programa de cuidadores, servicios académicos, asistencia 

educacional , garantías de préstamos hipotecarios, seguro y/o beneficios a dependientes y sobrevivientes.

EDUCACIÓN Y ENTRENAMIENTO

LEY GI POST‐9/11: FACTORES A CONSIDERAR
• ¿La persona tiene derechos restantes bajo otros Programas de Educación de VA?

Contáctenos: www.va.gov 1-800-827-1000

Servicio de educación – Septiembre 2012
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
Timothy E. Bixby, Chief Financial Officer of LivePerson, Inc. (the “Company”),
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the
Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      November 8, 2010
              By:
              /s/
      TIMOTHY E. BIXBYName:
              Timothy
      E. BixbyTitle:
              Chief
      Financial Officer




This
certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except
to the extent the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.
### §7912. Federal land open to hunting, fishing, and recreational shooting

#### (a) In general

Subject to subsection (b), Federal land shall be open to hunting, fishing, and recreational shooting, in accordance with applicable law, unless the Secretary concerned closes an area in accordance with section 7913 of this title.

#### (b) Effect of part

Nothing in this subchapter opens to hunting, fishing, or recreational shooting any land that is not open to those activities as of March 12, 2019.

(Pub. L. 116–9, title IV, §4102, Mar. 12, 2019, 133 Stat. 757.)
### §973q. Secretary of State to act for United States

The Secretary of State is authorized to receive on behalf of the United States reports, requests, and other communications from the Administrator and to act thereon directly or by reference to the appropriate authorities. The Secretary of State, after consultations with the Secretary, may accept or reject, on behalf of the United States, changes or amendments to Annex I of the Treaty and its Schedules and Annex II to the Treaty and its Schedules.

(Pub. L. 100–330, §19, June 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 600.)
Exhibit 1
                                                           ------------
<TABLE>


                    [CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A. LETTERHEAD]





September 10, 1998


Yasuda Bank and Trust Company (U.S.A.)
666 Fifth Avenue, Suite 802
New York, New York 10103

Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association, as Servicer
802 Delaware Avenue
Wilmington, Delaware 19801

         re:      Chase Manhattan Credit Card Master Trust - Removal of Accounts

Ladies and Gentlemen:
<S>     <C>

         We refer to the Chase Manhattan Credit Card Master Trust (the Trust), established pursuant to the First
Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 1, 1996 (the Pooling Agreement), between
Yasuda Bank and Trust Company, as Trustee (the Trustee) and Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association, as
Seller (the Seller) and Servicer (the Servicer).  Section 2.07 of the Pooling Agreement provides that if, on any
Determination date the Seller Interest (as therein defined) exceeds 10% of the Aggregate Principal Receivables at
the end of the day immediately prior to such date of determination, the Seller may designate Receivables from
Accounts for deletion and removal from the Trust (Removed Accounts).

         The Seller hereby notifies you that, effective as of October 1, 1998, pursuant to Reassignment No. 6 of
Receivables in Removed Accounts, dated as of October 1, 1998, between the Trustee and the Seller, it will
designate approximately $650 million aggregate amount of Receivables from certain randomly-selected accounts (the
account numbers for which will be provided to you as soon as possible) as Removed Accounts, and will cause the
Trustee to reconvey the Receivables from the Removed Accounts, whether now existing or hereafter created, from
the Trust to the Seller.

                                                     Very truly yours,

                                                     CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA,
                                                     NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Seller


                                                     /s/Keith Schuck
                                                    ---------------------------------
                                                     Keith Schuck
                                                     Controller

cc:      Patrick Margey
         Cris Kako
         Martin Joyce
         David Morris
         Robert DeMauro
         Kevin Gilmartin

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 22, 2021

No. 04-21-00440-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.A.T. JR. AND E.A.T., Children,

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-PA-01457

Honorable Kimberly Burley, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating appellant’s 

parental rights. The appellant’s brief originally was due to be filed on November 30, 2021 

and was not filed. On December 2, 2021, appellant filed a motion requesting an extension 

of time to file the brief. We granted the motion, extending the deadline to file the brief to 

December 20, 2021. The appellant’s brief was not, however, filed by the extended 

deadline. 

The disposition of this appeal is governed by the standards set forth in Rule 6.2 of 

the Texas Rules of Judicial Administration. TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. Accordingly, this 

appeal must be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of 

appeal is filed. Id. We therefore ORDER appellant’s appointed appellate attorney, Ms. 

M. Cecilia Hellrung, to file appellant’s brief in this appeal no later than January 6, 2022. 

If the brief is not filed by such date, we may abate this appeal to the trial court for a 

hearing to determine if new appellate counsel should be appointed and to consider 

whether sanctions should be imposed against Ms. Hellrung for failing to timely file 

appellant’s brief. 

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of December, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
<PAGE>   1

                            HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY
         EXHIBIT 12 - COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

   
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Years Ended December 31,
                                                 --------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  1998         1997            1996           1995(B)         1994(A)
                                                 ------       ------          ------          -------         -------
<S>                                              <C>          <C>             <C>             <C>              <C>  
Earnings (loss) before fixed charges:
  Net income (loss) before extraordinary 
    item and cumulative effect of 
    accounting changes                           $ 45.6       $ 49.8          $ 43.6          $ (7.2)          $52.4
  Provision (benefit) for income taxes             33.6         33.7            30.3            (4.2)           32.7
                                                 ------       ------          ------          ------           -----
Income (loss) from continuing operations 
  before taxes, extraordinary item, and
  cumulative effect of accounting changes          79.2         83.5            74.0           (11.4)           85.1
  Interest expense                                 34.7         39.7            41.6            15.2             7.7
  Interest portion of rent expense*                 3.1          2.7             3.0             3.8             3.4
                                                 ------       ------          ------          ------           -----
Earnings (loss) before fixed charges             $117.0       $125.9          $118.6          $  7.6           $96.2

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                 34.7         39.7            41.6            15.2             7.7
  Interest portion of rent expense*                 3.1          2.7             3.0             3.8             3.4
                                                 ------       ------          ------          ------           -----

Total fixed charges                              $ 37.8       $ 42.4          $ 44.6          $ 19.0           $11.1

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                  3.1          3.0             2.7             0.4             8.6
</TABLE>
    

(A)  On March 30, 1994, Houghton Mifflin completed an early redemption of $25
     million in senior notes due March 30, 1997. Houghton Mifflin recognized an
     extraordinary loss of $1.2 million, net of a tax benefit of $0.8 million.
     This extraordinary loss is excluded from earnings before fixed charges
     and interest expense in calculating the ratio of earning to fixed
     charges.

(B)  Houghton Mifflin would need $11.4 million in additional income to cover
     its fixed charges in 1995.

*    Includes the portion of rent expense for each period presented that is
     deemed by management to be the interest component of such rentals.
### §7611. Purposes

The purposes of this chapter are—

(1) to support a collaborative, interagency approach to address wildlife trafficking;

(2) to protect and conserve the remaining populations of wild elephants, rhinoceroses, and other species threatened by poaching and the illegal wildlife trade;

(3) to disrupt regional and global transnational organized criminal networks and to prevent the illegal wildlife trade from being used as a source of financing for criminal groups that undermine United States and global security interests;

(4) to prevent wildlife poaching and trafficking from being a means to make a living in focus countries;

(5) to support the efforts of, and collaborate with, individuals, communities, local organizations, and foreign governments to combat poaching and wildlife trafficking;

(6) to assist focus countries in implementation of national wildlife anti-trafficking and poaching laws; and

(7) to ensure that United States assistance to prevent and suppress illicit wildlife trafficking is carefully planned and coordinated, and that it is systematically and rationally prioritized on the basis of detailed analysis of the nature and severity of threats to wildlife and the willingness and ability of foreign partners to cooperate effectively toward these ends.

(Pub. L. 114–231, title I, §101, Oct. 7, 2016, 130 Stat. 951.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 114–231, Oct. 7, 2016, 130 Stat. 949, known as the Eliminate, Neutralize, and Disrupt Wildlife Trafficking Act of 2016, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note under section 7601 of this title and Tables.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70 -68

 36

 38

 40

 42

 44

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲

 1000

 1500

 2000

 2500

 1000

18 12 06 00

05/30

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
EXHIBIT 23



    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


    We consent to the incorporation by reference in
    Idaho Power Company's Registration Statement Nos. 33-
    51215 and 333-33124 on Form S-3 and IDACORP, Inc's
    Registration Statement Nos. 333-00139 and 333-64737
    on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-89445
    and 333-65157 on Form S-8 of our reports dated
    February 1, 2001 on IDACORP, Inc. and Idaho Power
    Company, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-
    K of IDACORP, Inc. and Idaho Power Company for the
    year ended December 31, 2000.





    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

    Boise, Idaho
    March 16, 2001
#### § 313.4 Procedure.

In all cases in which the applicant claims membership or affiliation in any of the organizations covered by § 313.2, the applicant shall attach to the application a detailed written statement describing such membership or affiliation, including the periods of membership or affiliation, whether the applicant held any office in the organization, and whether membership or affiliation was voluntary or involuntary. If the applicant alleges that membership or affiliation was involuntary, or that one of the other exemptions in § 313.3 applies, the applicant's statement shall set forth the basis of that allegation.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James David SLUSS, a/k/a J.D., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-4710.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 9, 2002.

Decided May 9, 2002.

G. Ernest Skaggs, Skaggs & Skaggs, Fayetteville, West Virginia, for Appellant. Kasey Warner, United States Attorney, Monica K. Schwartz, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

James David Sluss pled guilty to use of a telephone in the commission of a drug trafficking felony, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b) (1994). He appeals his sentence. Sluss’ attorney has filed a brief citing *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), contending the district court erred in determining Sluss’ relevant conduct but stating that, in his view, there are no meritorious issues for appeal. Sluss has filed a pro se supplemental brief.

We review the district court’s factual findings regarding the application of the federal sentencing guidelines for clear error. *United States v. Williams,*977 F.2d 866, 869 (4th Cir.1992); *United States v. Daughtrey,*874 F.2d 213, 217 (4th Cir. 1989). We find the district court did not clearly error in determining Sluss’ relevant conduct. *See United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual*§ 1B1.3(a)(2) (2000). We have also reviewed Sluss’ supplemental brief and find his claims meritless.

In accordance with *Anders,*we have reviewed the entire record and find no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm Sluss’ conviction and sentence. We deny Sluss’ motions to relieve his counsel and to appoint him new counsel. This court requires that counsel inform his chent, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel's motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before *119the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### § 300.213 Records regarding migratory children with disabilities.

The LEA must cooperate in the Secretary's efforts under section 1308 of the ESEA to ensure the linkage of records pertaining to migratory children with disabilities for the purpose of electronically exchanging, among the States, health and educational information regarding those children.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0600)

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1413(a)(9))
----

Removal from the register of Case C-72/04 (1)

(2004/C 314/28)

By order of 24 September 2004 the President of the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ordered the removal from the register of Case C-72/04: Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland.

----

(1) OJ C 94 of 17.4.2004.

----
# Official Journal C 39A/4 Fe

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 39A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 644 February 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 39A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 644 February 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2021/C 39 A/01 | Notice of open competition – EPSO/AD/389/21 – Administrators (AD 6) in the field of sustainable agriculture and rural development | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2021/C 39 A/01

Notice of open competition – EPSO/AD/389/21 – Administrators (AD 6) in the field of sustainable agriculture and rural development

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 252.2 Revocation of conditional landing permits; removal. ( a ) *Revocation and removal while vessel is in the United States.* A crewman whose landing permit is subject to revocation pursuant to section 252(b) of the Act may be taken into custody by any immigration officer without a warrant of arrest and be transferred to the vessel of arrival, if the vessel is in any port in the United States and has not departed foreign since the crewman was issued his or her conditional landing permit. Detention and removal of the crewman shall be at the expense of the transportation line on which the crewman arrived. Removal may be effected on the vessel of arrival or, if the master of the vessel has requested in writing, by alternate means if removal on the vessel of arrival is impractical.
( b ) *Revocation and removal after vessel has departed the United States.* A crewman who was granted landing privileges prior to April 1, 1997, and who has not departed foreign on the vessel of arrival, or on another vessel or aircraft if such permission was granted pursuant to § 252.1(f), is subject to removal proceedings under section 240 of the Act as an alien deportable pursuant to section 237(a)(1)(C)(i) of the Act. A crewman who was granted landing privileges on or after April 1, 1997, and who has not departed foreign on the vessel of arrival, or on another vessel or aircraft if such permission was granted pursuant to § 252.1(f), shall be removed from the United States without a hearing, except as provided in § 208.2(b)(1) of this chapter. In either case, if the alien is removed within 5 years of the date of landing, removal of the crewman shall be at the expense of the owner of the vessel. In the case of a crewman ordered removed more than 5 years after the date of landing, removal shall be at the expense of the appropriation for the enforcement of the Act.
[62 FR 10388, Mar. 6, 1997]