## ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAl PROTECTION AGENCY

1021 N O RT H GRAND A VENU E EAS T, P.O
. BOX 19276, SPRI NGFIELD, I LLIN OI S 62794-9276 • ( 2 1 7) 782-3397 PAT QUINN, GOV ERNOR JOHN J. KIM, INTERIM D l R ECTOR 217 17 82-5544 2171782-9143 (TDD) September 11, 2012

George Czerniak, Acting Director Air and Radiation Division United States Environmental

Protection Agency Region V 77 West Jackson Boulevard, AR-18J Chicago , Illinois 60604-3598 

### SEP I

CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 7009 2820 0001 7496 1749



### Re: R12-8: IN THE MATTER OF: AMENDMENTS TO 35 ILL. ADM. CODE PART 223, STANDARDS AND LIMITATIONS FOR ORGANIC MATERIAL EMISSIONS FOR AREA SOURCES Dear Ntf. Cz 

### ak: 

# 2:: 0**/** Pursu nt to Section 110(a)(2) ofthe Clean Air Act (CAA) (42 U.S.C. §7410 (a)(2)) , and Section 28 ofthe Illinois Environmental Protection Act (415 ILCS 5/28), the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Illinois EPA) submits the following amendments to the Illinois State Implementation Plan (SIP). This submittal complies with the substance of the October 20, 2009 , e-mail from Mr. Jolm Smmnerhays to Char les Matoesian ofthe Illinois EPA. See Attachment 17. On July 13 , 2011, the Illinois EPA filed a proposal to amend Part to 3 5 Ill. Adm. Code 223 with the Illinois Pollution Control Board (!PCB). Notice ofHearing w as filed on August 4, 2011. Public hearings were held on October 6, 2011, in Springfield, Illinois and November 17, 2011 , in Chicago , Illinois. The Illinois EPA filed post-hea ring comments in support ofthe propo sed amendments
. On Ma y 14, 2012, the IPCB adopted a Final Opinion and Order adopting the amendm ents to 3 5 Ill
. Adm
. Code 223
.

4302 N. M a in St. , Rockford , l l 6 1 I 0 3 (81 5 ) 987 -776 0 595 S. S to l e , El g i n, l l 60 1 23 (847 ) 608 -3 1 31 2 1 25 S. Fi rs t S

t
. , Ch ampaign , IL 6 1 820 (217)278- 58 0 0 2009 Ma l l S t. , Co llinsvil le, I L 62234 (6 1 8 )346 -5 1 2 0 PLEAS E PR INT O N RECYCLED PAPER 95 1 1 H arrison S t. , Des Pla ines, I L 600 1 6 (847)294 -4000 540 7 N. Univers ity St
. , Arbor 1 1 3, Peo ria, l l616 1 4 (309)693 -5462 2309 W. Main S t ., Suite 116, Maria n, l l 62959 (6 1 8)993 -7200 100 W. Rando l ph, Suite 11 -300, Ch icago, I L 60601 (3 1 2 )814 -60 26In order to assist with your review of this SIP submittal, the following docwnents are enclosed and an electronic disc is included which contains identical copies of these documents: Attachment I) Attachment 2)

Attachment 3) Attaclunent 4)
Attaclunent 5) Attaclunent 6) Attaclunent 7)
Attaclunent 8) Attaclunent 9) Attaclunent 1 0) Attaclunent 11)
Attaclunent 12)
Attaclunent 13)
Attaclunent 14)
Attaclunent 15) Illinois EPA's Regulatory Proposal, filed July 13,2011 Letter from Acting Chairman Girard, IPCB to Warren Ribley, Director, Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity, request for economic impact study, dated August 4, 2011 IPCB Order accepting Proposal for Hearing, August 4, 2011 IPCB Hearing Officer Order, Notice ofHearings, dated August 4, 2011 Prefiled Testimony ofRory Davis Prefiled Testimony ofthe Consumer Specialty Products Association DCEO Rejection of carrying out an economic impact study, September 28, 2011 Transcript ofHearing on October 6, 2011 Hearing Officer Order, November 17, 2011 Transcript ofHearing on November 18, 2011 Order ofthe Board sending rulemaking to First Notice, dated January 5, 2012 Illinois Register Notice ofProposed Amendments, volume 36, issue 3, p. 727, published January 20, 2012 JCAR Request for Economic and Budgetary Effects, January 19, 2012 Opinion Order ofthe IPCB by T.A. Holbrook sending proposal to Second Notice, dated March 15, 2012 JCAR Letter accepting the Standards and Limitations for Organic Material Emissions for Area Sources for Second Notice. Dated March 19, 2012Attachment 16)
Attaclunent 17)
Attachment 18) Adopted Rule, Final Order, Opinion and Order ofthe IPCB by T.A. Holbrook, dated May 3, 2012 Illinois Register Notice ofAdopted Rule, volume 36, issue 20, p. 7569, published May 18,2012 E-mail from John Summerhays to Charles Matoesian The SIP Checklists are also enclosed to assist in your review. Iffurther infonnation is required, please contact Shannon Bilbruck ofmy staff at 217/782-5544.
Cordially,

# ·j~{~J[_~ Laurel L. Kroack, Chief Bureau ofAir AttachmentsSTATE IMPLEMENTION PLAN CHECKLISTS
In the Matter of:
R12-08: IN THE MATTER OF: AMENDMENTS TO 35 ILL. ADM. CODE PART 223,

STANDARDS AND LIMITATIONS FOR ORGANIC MATERIAL EMISSIONS FOR AREA SOURCES

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Bureau ofAir Division ofLegal Counsel 1021 North Grand Ave. East P.O. Box 19276 Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276

## .. ADMIN'ISTRATIVE ·CIIEC:k.tlST ::> : Re: Rl2-08 Attachment 1. The Submittal is accompanied by a formal letter of Yes, Cover submittal from the Governor or designee. Letter The date of submittal is 

# 5e

# pl. 11 1 

## "l-0 

## I '2-- August X*;'**~** 2. Evidence is provided that the revision has been adopted in Yes, Cover the State Code or body ofregulations. Letter, 17 

## • The date ofadoption is
. May 18, 2012 

## • Test methods/rules are correctly incorporated by N/A reference 3. Evidence is provided that the State has the necessary legal Sections 4, authority under State law to adopt and implement the 27, & 28 of revlSlon the Ill Env. Prot Act 4. A copy ofthe actual regulation or document is included in 16,17 the submittal 5. Evidence is provided that the State followed all the 1,2,3,4,8,9,1 0, requirements ofits Administrative procedures Act (or 11,12,14,15, equivalent) in conducting and completing adoption/issuance 16,17 ofthe revision. 6. Evidence is provided that public notice was given by the 3, 4, 11, 12, State, including the date ofpublication. 14, 16, 17 7. Certification is provided that the public hearing was held in 4,8,10,11 accordance with the information provided in the public notice. The dates ofthe public hearings were October 6, 2011, & November 17, 2011 8. The submittal contains a compilation ofthe exhibits entered 8,10,11 into the record at hearing. 9. The submittal contains a compilation ofpublic comments 16, *See Board website<;.;<


### .. :::::<· .::······<···· !'·}· 

## .r.,:r**~>** ·:

## ~ i Re: R12-08 A 1. The regulated pollutants affected by revision are: sulfur dioxide
__ ; ozone 

### __x_; particulate matter __ ; 1 mu;;cu dioxide ; carbon monoxide ; lead 2. Attainment status designation for the affected area is 

### I included in the submittal.· Status ofthe attainment plan for the affected area is 1 included in the submittal. The attainment date for the affected area is included in the 1 submittal. 

### 3. The lncMinns and types of: sources are**•~** · 

### I ,16 4. Changes in SIP-allowable emissions for affected sources are N/A**.~** or estimated. Changes in actual emissions from affected sources are 

### I or estimated. 5. Evidence is provided that the NAAQS will be protected if 1 the revision is "JJJJlU vcd and ;, 

# ,,, " Evidence is provided that the PSD increment will be 1**~** ifthe revision is and· Evidence is provided that the RFP demonstration will be N/A "ifthe revision is**"~JJ!uved** and'· ·' ted Evidence is provided that visibility will be protected ifthe N/A reVISIOn lS**~and** imnl.**-~** 

### 6. Modeling information is provided (ifnecessary) in support 1 ofthe revision. 7. The proposed emission limitations are based on continuous N/A emissions reduction -'- >10gy, 8. The emissions limitations requirements are incorporated (if N/A y) to ensure emission levels. The work practice standards requirements are incorporated N/A (if**nP~** to ensure emission levels. The recordkeeping/reporting requirements are incorporated N/A (if to ensure emission levels. 9. The submittal contains enforcement/compliance strategies, N/A including how compliance will be detennined in practice and at what "-

## '•••·ENFORCEABILITY CIIECK:Lisr··
................ ················' ; • ; .. •. Re: Rl2-08 Attachment L AQQlicability What sources are being regulated? I What are criteria for exemption? N/A Is calculation procedure for exemption clearly specified? N/A Is emission inventory listed in the background document of I the attainment demonstration? Are the averaging times used in the rule different from N/A those ofthe ambient standard? What are the units of compliance ? Percent VOM by Weight Is bubbling or averaging ofany type allowed? Ifyes, state NO criteria. Could a USEPA inspector independently determine ifthe criteria were met? Does EPA have to approve each case? Ifthere is a redesignation, will this change the emission N/A limitations? Ifyes, which ones and how? 2. ComQliance Dates What is the compliance date? July I, 2012 What is the attainment date? N/A 3. SQecificity of Conduct What test method is required? N/A What is the averaging time in compliance test method? N/A Is a compliance calculation or evaluation required? (i.e., N/A daily weighted average for VOC) Ifyes, list the formula, period of compliance, and/or N/A evaluation period. 4. Incomoration by Reference What is the state authority for rulemaking? Sections 4, 27, & 28 oflll. Env.

Prot. Act Are methods/rules incorporated by reference in the right N/A manner? 5. RecordkeeQing What records are required to determine compliance? N/A In what form or units (lbs/gal, gr/dscf, etc...) must the Percent VOM records be kept? On what time basis (instantaneously, by Weight hourly, daily)? Does the rule affirmatively require the records be kept? N/A 6. ExemQtion List any exemptions allowed. See !EPA's Statement of N/A Proposal-attachment I Is the criteria for application clear? N/A