alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §521b. Report of Secretary of Agriculture prior to purchase or exchange of land; contents; waiting period

For purposes of providing information that will aid the Congress in its oversight responsibilities and improve the accountability of expenditures for the acquisition of forest land, the Secretary of Agriculture may not hereafter enter into any land purchase or exchange relating to the National Forest System of $150,000 or more for the types of lands which have been heretofore approved by the National Forest Reservation Commission until after 30 days from the date upon which a detailed report of the facts concerning such proposed purchase or transfer is submitted to the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate or such earlier time as may be approved by both such committees. Such report shall contain at least the following:

(1) guidelines utilized by the Secretary in determining that the land should be acquired;

(2) the location and size of the land;

(3) the purchase price of the land and the criteria used by the Secretary in determining such price;

(4) the person from whom the land is being acquired; and

(5) any adjustment made by the Secretary of relative value pursuant to section 1716(f)(2)(B)(ii) of title 43.

(Pub. L. 94–588, §17(b), Oct. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 2962; Pub. L. 100–409, §6, Aug. 20, 1988, 102 Stat. 1090; Pub. L. 103–437, §6(r), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4587.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Forest Reservation Commission, referred to in text, was abolished and the functions thereof were transferred to the Secretary of Agriculture by section 17(a)(1) of Pub. L. 94–588, Oct. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 2961.

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–437 in introductory provisions substituted "Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate" for "Agriculture and Forestry of the Senate".

1988—Pub. L. 100–409 substituted "$150,000" for "$25,000" in introductory provisions and added par. (5).
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                              
Exhibit 12(c)
                               Idaho Power Company
                       Consolidated Financial Information
 Supplemental Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividend
                                  Requirements

                                                                                            
                                                           Twelve Months Ended December 31,           
                                                               (Thousands of Dollars)             
                                                               
                                                1991      1992      1993      1994      1995      1996
<S>                                          <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>          
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to
 Fixed Charges:
   Consolidated net income                   $ 57,872  $ 59,990  $ 84,464  $ 74,930  $ 86,921  $ 90,618
Income taxes:
  Income taxes (includes amounts charged
    to  other  income  and deductions)         24,321    24,601    38,057    35,307    49,498    51,316
   Investment  tax  credit adjustment          (3,177)   (1,439)   (1,583)   (1,064)   (1,086)      776

      Total  income  taxes                     21,144    23,162    36,474    34,243    48,412    52,092

Income  before  income  taxes                  79,016    83,152   120,938   109,173   135,333   142,710

Fixed Charges:
   Interest  on  long-term debt                54,370    53,408    53,706    51,172    51,147    52,165
  Amortization of debt discount,
     expense  and  premium  -  net                374       392       507       567       567       594
    Interest  on  short-term  bank  loans         935       647       220     1,157     3,144     2,269
    Other  interest                             3,297     1,011     2,023     1,538     1,598     2,319
   Interest  portion  of  rentals                 884       683     1,077       794       925       991

      Total  fixed  charges                    59,860    56,141    57,533    55,228    57,381    58,338
   Suppl  increment  to  fixed charges*         1,599     2,487     2,631     2,622     2,611     2,600

      Supplemental  fixed  charges             61,459    58,628    60,164    57,850    59,992    60,938
     Preferred  dividend  requirements          6,663     7,611     8,547    10,682    12,392    12,146
     Total supplemental fixed charges
       and  preferred  dividends               68,122    66,239    68,711    68,532    72,384    73,084

Supplemental  earnings  - as defined         $140,475  $141,780  $181,102  $167,023  $195,325  $203,648

Supplemental ratio of earnings to fixed
  charges  and  preferred  dividends            2.06X     2.14X     2.64X     2.44X     2.70X     2.79X
<F2>
* Explanation of increment:
  Interest on the guaranty of American Falls Reservoir District Bonds
  and Milner Dam Inc. Notes which are already included in operating expense.
</TABLE>
Case 17-33303-KRH Doc 70 Filed 03/22/22 Entered 03/22/22 14:23:59 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case 17-33303-KRH Doc 70 Filed 03/22/22 Entered 03/22/22 14:23:59 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
#### § 101.71 Statement of position and trial briefs.

The presiding officer may require parties and amici curiae to file written statements of position prior to the beginning of a hearing. The presiding officer may also require the parties to submit trial briefs.
# Official Journal C 310A/8 De

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 310A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 488 December 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 310A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 488 December 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2005/C 310A/2 | Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/42/05 to constitute a reserve of lawyer-linguists (AD 7) who have Polish as their main language.This competition requires a university graduate level of education and two years’ professional experience | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2005/C 310A/2

Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/42/05 to constitute a reserve of lawyer-linguists (AD 7) who have Polish as their main language.This competition requires a university graduate level of education and two years’ professional experience

EPSO/AD/42/05

AD 7

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 46031

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

JOE ANTHONY SANTIAGO,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Filed: February 13, 2019

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Lynn G. Norton, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and suspended unified sentence of seven years, with a 

minimum period of confinement of two years, for possession of a controlled 

substance, affirmed. 

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Andrea W. Reynolds, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; HUSKEY, Judge;

and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM 

Joe Anthony Santiago pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance. I.C. § 37-

2732(c)(1)(F). In exchange for his guilty plea, an additional charge was dismissed. The parties 

entered into a plea agreement in which the parties agreed that the State would recommend 

probation with an underlying sentence of seven years, with a minimum period of confinement of 

three years. At sentencing, the State made the agreed-upon sentencing recommendation. 

Santiago concurred with the recommendation. The district court sentenced Santiago to a unified 
2

term of seven years, with a minimum period of confinement of only two years; suspended the 

sentence; and placed Santiago on probation. Santiago appeals, without acknowledging his 

concurrence in the State’s sentencing recommendation. Santiago argues his sentence, which is 

less than the recommendation, is excessive.

Although Santiago received a lesser sentence than he agreed to at the time of sentencing,

he asserts that his underlying suspended sentence is excessive. The doctrine of invited error 

applies to estop a party from asserting an error when his or her own conduct induces the 

commission of the error. State v. Atkinson, 124 Idaho 816, 819, 864 P.2d 654, 657 (Ct. App. 

1993). One may not complain of errors one has consented to or acquiesced in. State v. Caudill, 

109 Idaho 222, 226, 706 P.2d 456, 460 (1985); State v. Lee, 131 Idaho 600, 605, 961 P.2d 1203, 

1208 (Ct. App. 1998). In short, invited errors are not reversible. State v. Gittins, 129 Idaho 54, 

58, 921 P.2d 754, 758 (Ct. App. 1996). This doctrine applies to sentencing decisions as well as 

rulings made during trial. State v. Griffith, 110 Idaho 613, 614, 716 P.2d 1385, 1386 (Ct. App. 

1986). 

Therefore, because Santiago received a lesser sentence than he requested, he may not 

complain that the district court abused its discretion. Accordingly, Santiago’s suspended unified 

sentence of seven years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years, for possession of a 

controlled substance is affirmed.
### §8213. Prohibition against implementation of regulatory authority by Federal agencies through partnerships

Any Partnership designated under this chapter—

(1) shall be for the sole purpose of promoting fish conservation; and

(2) shall not be used to implement any regulatory authority of any Federal agency.

(Pub. L. 116–188, title II, §213, Oct. 30, 2020, 134 Stat. 938.)
Exhibit 12.1
 SunGard Capital Corp.
SunGard Capital Corp. II
SunGard Data Systems Inc.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (Unaudited)
($ in millions)
 Predecessor(1)
    
    
    
    SuccessorAugust 11January 1
    
    
    
    throughthrough August
    
    
    
    December 31,10, 2005
    
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2009Fixed chargesInterest expense
    
    $
    14
    
    
    
    $
    228
    
    
    $
    616
    
    
    $
    608
    
    
    $
    561
    
    
    $
    584Amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    
    20
    
    
    
    40
    
    
    
    37
    
    
    
    37
    
    
    
    42Portion of rental expense representative of interest
    
    
    38
    
    
    
    
    25
    
    
    
    61
    
    
    
    69
    
    
    
    75
    
    
    
    81Total fixed charges
    
    $
    55
    
    
    
    $
    273
    
    
    $
    717
    
    
    $
    714
    
    
    $
    673
    
    
    $
    707EarningsIncome (loss) before income taxes
    
    $
    288
    
    
    
    $
    (62
    )
    
    $
    (139
    )(2)
    
    $
    (63
    )
    
    $
    (204
    )(3)
    
    $
    (1,191
    )Fixed charges per above
    
    
    55
    
    
    
    
    273
    
    
    
    717
    
    
    
    714
    
    
    
    673
    
    
    
    707Total earnings
    
    $
    343
    
    
    
    $
    211
    
    
    $
    578
    (2)
    
    $
    651
    
    
    $
    469
    (3)
    
    $
    (484
    )Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    6.2
    
    
    
    
    *
    
    
    
    *
    
    
    
    *
    
    
    
    *
    
    
    
    *
 
 *
    
    Earnings for the period August 11 through December 31, 2005 and for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007, 2008
and 2009 were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $62 million, $139 million, $63 million, $204 million and $1,191
million, respectively.(1)
    
    SunGard Capital Corp. (SCC) and SunGard Capital Corp. II (SCCII) were created in 2005 for the purpose of acquiring
SunGard Data Systems Inc. (SunGard) which occurred on August 11, 2005. SCC and SCCII do not have results prior to
August 11, 2005.(2)
    
    SCCs income (loss) before operations and total earnings for 2006 were $(137) million and $580 million, respectively.(3)
    
    SCCs income (loss) before operations and total earnings for 2008 were $(205) million and $468 million, respectively.
ADDENDUM



EXHIBIT 10.5

 

ADDENDUM TO THE AGREEMENT




THIS ADDENDUM TO THE “AGREEMENT Dated June 4, 2003”, is entered into as of September 25, 2003 by and between TTR HP, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Borrower”), and David Richards (“Lender”), collectively referred hereto as “parties”.




  The Borrower and Lender have previously agreed that Lender will make available a Loan of up to $500,000 to Borrower, to be used to fund Borrower’s Aeroturbine manufacturing and distribution operations.  It is now the intent of this Addendum to modify the Agreement as follows:




Loan Amount.  The parties hereby agree that the Lender will loan an additional, Two Hundred Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($225,000) to the Borrower.  Bringing the total amount loaned by the Lender under the Agreement to, Seven Hundred Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($725,000).  Lender shall deliver the $225,000 to the Borrower contemporaneously with the execution of this Addendum.

 

Term and Termination.  The Lender shall make the entire Loan of $725,000 available for a term of 12 months beginning on June 5, 2003 and ending on June 5, 2004, (“Term”) unless otherwise extended in writing by both parties.  The Borrower may terminate this agreement at any time, without penalty, by paying the Loan in full and submitting a written notification to the Lender notifying of the termination.  Notwithstanding the termination, the Convertibility Option shall remain open until the June 5, 2004 deadline.  At the end of the 12 month Term, the Lender at his discretion may convert the Loan as per the Convertible Option outline contained in the Agreement; or call the note due and payable, at which time the Borrower will have thirty (30) days to pay the loan in full, or as otherwise directed by the Lender in writing.




Payments.  The Borrower shall make payments to the Lender during the Term of the Loan representing interest only payments.  Notwithstanding, the Borrower may make principal and interest payments at his discretion.  Payments shall begin August 1, 2003.  Payments are due on the 20th day of each month for the interest accrued during the proceeding month.  The borrower shall also deliver to the Lender an additional 20,000 shares of TTR HP Common stock at the end of the 12-month Term as added interest, bringing the total interest related shares to 40,000.




This Addendum shall only supersede those sections specifically listed in the Addendum, all other provisions and covenants contained in the Agreement shall remain intact.




[Signature Page Follows]




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Addendum as of the date first above written.




Borrower:




TTR HP, Inc., 

a Nevada corporation




Dated: September 25, 2003

By: /s/ Bryan Hunsaker

Bryan Hunsaker, 

Its: CEO







Lender:




Dated: September 23, 2003

By: /s/ David Richards

David Richards
659.0658
---

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

|I, Veronica Jing Chen, certify that:
|------------------------------------
|                                    
|1.                                  
|                                    
|2.                                  
|                                    
|3.                                  
|                                    
|4.                                  
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|5.                                  
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    

Date: June 29, 2011

/s/ Veronica Jing
ChenVeronica Jing Chen Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)

---
#### In the Matter of Acquiring Title by the City of New York, Appellant, to Certain Lands, etc., on the Easterly Side of Pennsylvania Avenue, etc. Anna J. Doyle, Appellant; Sambern Amusement Company, Respondent.

Appeal dismissed, without costs. In view of the seeming conflict between *Matter of City of New York, Hamilton Place*(143 App. Div. 302; 202 N. Y. 607), and *Matter of Simmons*(208 N. Y. 241), an appeal will be allowed to the Court of Appeals from the order of dismissal, and an appropriate question certified to that court if the present appellants so elect. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T November

25, 2008 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 0 7- 15 74 4 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D. C. Dock etNo. 0 7- 60 81 8- CV-AJ JUDY COPELAND, wit h h el p o f ro omm at e Car l Sh el l due to Ju dy Cop el an d's m en ta l re ta rd at io n, Pl ai nt iff , CARL SHELL,
Pro po se d In te rv en or -Ap pe ll an t,
ve rs us HOUSING AUTHO RITY OF HOLLYW OOD, TIM SC HWARTZ,
Defen da nt s- App el le es .__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e So ut he rn Dis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (No ve m be r 25 , 20 08 )
Befo re ANDERSON, CARNES, an d HULL, Cir cu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM: Bec au se we ha ve de ci de d t ha t t he di st ric t co urt p ro pe rly gran te d s umm ary jud gm en t o n J udy

Co pe la nd ’s cla im s u nd erl y in g t hi s ch al le ng e, se e Co pe la ndv. Hou si ng Aut ho rit y

of Ho ll ywoo d, No . 08 -1 07 44 (11 th Cir . Nov . __ , 20 08 ), Carl Sh el l’s m ot io n t o i nt erv en e is DENIE D.

2
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Private  Access,  Inc., on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned,  B.
Stephen Bailey,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: September 4, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 12.13 When is use of the transferred surplus Federal real property by entities other than the transferee or lessee permissible? ( a ) *By eligible entities.* A transferee or lessee may permit the use of all or a portion of the surplus Federal real property by another eligible entity as described in § 12.5, only upon those terms and conditions the Secretary determines appropriate if— ( 1 ) The Secretary determines that the proposed use would not substantially limit the program and plan of use by the transferee or lessee and that the use will not unduly burden the Department;
( 2 ) The Secretary's written consent is obtained by the transferee or lessee in advance; and
( 3 ) The Secretary approves the use instrument in advance and in writing.
( b ) *By ineligible entities.* A transferee or lessee may permit the use of a portion of the surplus Federal real property by an ineligible entity, one not described in § 12.5, only upon those terms and conditions the Secretary determines appropriate if— ( 1 ) In accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, the Secretary makes the required determination and approves both the use and the use instrument;
( 2 ) The use is confined to a portion of the surplus Federal real property;
( 3 ) The use does not interfere with the approved program and plan of use for which the surplus Federal real property was conveyed; and
( 4 ) Any rental fees or other compensation for use are either remitted directly to the Secretary or are applied to purposes expressly approved in writing in advance by the Secretary.
(Authority: 40 U.S.C. 484(k)(4))
### §916h. Cooperation between Federal and State and private agencies and organizations in scientific and other programs

#### (a) Agency cooperation

In order to avoid duplication in scientific and other programs, the Secretary of State, with the concurrence of the agency, institution, or organization concerned, may direct the United States Commissioner to arrange for the cooperation of agencies of the United States Government, and of State and private institutions and organizations in carrying out the provisions of article IV of the convention.

#### (b) Authorization for Federal agency cooperation

All agencies of the Federal Government are authorized, on request of the Commission, to cooperate in the conduct of scientific and other programs, or to furnish facilities and personnel for the purpose of assisting the Commission in the performance of its duties as prescribed by the convention.

(Aug. 9, 1950, ch. 653, §10, 64 Stat. 424.)
M isso uri

ek

ail Creek

Georgeto

L

ders Fork

W

Bould e r Ri ver 

De ep Creek 

T enmil e 

Mill Creek 

Lost Cr e e k 

B lackfoot River 

S i xte en M il e Cre ek

iver 

Clark

F ork

Ri v

er 

Sil ver Cr eek 

Prick ly Pear Creek 

Tro ut Cr ee k 

Bison Creek 

Be ave r Creek 

Br owns Gulch 

S i l v e r w Cr e e k 

C anyon Cre e k 

Lump G u l ch 

W arm Springs Creek 

Seymour Cre 

White t 

Confe derat e Gulch 

Willow Cr k 

Lan 

arm

Springs Creek 

Nev a d a C re ek 

Dog Creek

Cree k 

Avalanch Creek 

Crow Creek 

g:\blm\buttermp\ams\FinalFigures\Fig2-5_ImparedLkStr1117.mxd 

1003010

UPPER MI

Holter Lake 

Cascade County

1701020

BLACKFOOT
 ee

Lew

SSOURI-DEARBORN 

Broadwa

Townsend

R

is and Clark County 

Hauser Lake 

Meagher County 

1701020

Powell County UPPER CLARK FORK Helena 

East Helena 

£¤12

Je

Canyon

Reservo i

Ferr

r fferson County 

§ ̈¦15

ter County 

£¤12

FL

1701020

INT-ROCK 

1002000

BOULDER
 

Boulder 

wn

ake 

Anaconda 

1003010

UPPER MISSOURI 90 

1701020

UPPER CLARK FORK 

§ ̈¦

Deerlodge County 

£¤287 

Butte

Bo

I Streams Unimpaired Lakes

Streams Previously Listed as Impaired on BLM Land Lakes Previously Listed as Impaired Impaired Lakes and Streams

0 Miles 10 Butte Field Office - EIS Impaired Streams on 2002 303(d) List on BLM Land Impaired Lakes on 2002 303(d) List 

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Map RMP Planning Area, Montana 4th Level Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) Boundary and Number Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Lands FIGURE 2-5a Land Management (BLM) for use of Location

data for purposes not intended by BLM.