alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1302. Mailing lottery tickets or related matter

Whoever knowingly deposits in the mail, or sends or delivers by mail:

Any letter, package, postal card, or circular concerning any lottery, gift enterprise, or similar scheme offering prizes dependent in whole or in part upon lot or chance;

Any lottery ticket or part thereof, or paper, certificate, or instrument purporting to be or to represent a ticket, chance, share, or interest in or dependent upon the event of a lottery, gift enterprise, or similar scheme offering prizes dependent in whole or in part upon lot or chance;

Any check, draft, bill, money, postal note, or money order, for the purchase of any ticket or part thereof, or of any share or chance in any such lottery, gift enterprise, or scheme;

Any newspaper, circular, pamphlet, or publication of any kind containing any advertisement of any lottery, gift enterprise, or scheme of any kind offering prizes dependent in whole or in part upon lot or chance, or containing any list of the prizes drawn or awarded by means of any such lottery, gift enterprise, or scheme, whether said list contains any part or all of such prizes;

Any article described in section 1953 of this title—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both; and for any subsequent offense shall be imprisoned not more than five years.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 762; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, §29, 65 Stat. 721; Pub. L. 87–218, §2, Sept. 13, 1961, 75 Stat. 492; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §336 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §213, 35 Stat. 1129).

Reference to persons causing or procuring was omitted as unnecessary in view of definition of "principal" in section 2 of this title.

Venue provision was omitted as covered by sections 3231 and 3237 of this title.

Minor changes were made in arrangement and phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000" in last par.

1961—Pub. L. 87–218 inserted sixth par., relating to articles described in section 1953 of this title.

1951—Act Oct. 31, 1951, substituted a colon for a semicolon at end of opening clause.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
 

Bureau of Land Management
 

Butte Field Office
 

Draft RMP/EIS
 

Map 14: Lewis & Clark County
 

NW Travel Plan Route
 

Designations Under Alternative A
 

BLM Routes Bureau of Land Managment (BLM)
 

Open Yearlong
 Bureau of Reclamation
 

Closed Yearlong
 County / City Government 

BLM Routes with Restrictions Private
 

Closed 12/2 to 5/15
 State Lands
 

Other Routes 

Other Federal Lands
 Public Access Route
 

US Forest Service (USFS)
 Non-BLM Route
 

Water
 Interstate
 

County Boundary
 US Highway
 

Field Office / TPA Boundary
 State Highway 

Map shows existing road management within the Lewis and Clark County NW Travel Planning Area under Alternative A. 

Under this alternative 57.7 miles of road would be Open yearlong, 6.7 miles of road would be Open with a seasonal closure 

from December 2 to May 15, and 3.4 miles of road would be Closed yearlong. 

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land
 

Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data for individual
 

or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. This map may
 

not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed through
 

digital means and information may be updated without notification.
 

Miles Malta 

Field Office 0 4 
 

Map Scale 1:80,000
 Missoula 

Map generated by the Butte Field Office in February 2007 Field Office 

Lewistown 

Field Office Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection Miles City 

Field Office 

Butte 

Field 

Office Billings 

Field Office 

Dillon 

Field Office 

Miles 

0 400
### **CHAPTER 85—PRISON-MADE GOODS**

Sec.
1761.
Transportation or importation.
1762.
Marking packages.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

In Re: 

Ahmed Y. Ahmed Case # 18-10900-BFK 

REPORT OF DEPOSIT OF UNCLAIMED FUNDS 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3011 and 11 U.S.C. 347, the trustee 

herein submits a check, or checks, payable to the “Clerk, United States Bankruptcy Court” 

representing unclaimed funds to be deposited by the Clerk of the Court into the Treasury 

of the United States. Said funds are subject to withdrawal as provided by 28 U.S.C. 2042 

and shall not escheat under any state law. Unclaimed funds represent the dividend(s) due 

and payable to the entity identified as the original payee on the face of the enclosed 

check(s). 

PAYEE 

AHMED Y. AHMED 

12401 Casbeer Drive 

Fairfax, VA 22033 

AMOUNT 

$1,591.00 

Dated: May 13, 2021 __/s/Thomas P. Gorman ___________ 

Thomas P. Gorman 

300 North Washington Street, Ste. 400 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

(703) 836-2226 

VSB#26421 

Case 18-10900-BFK Doc 103 Filed 05/13/21 Entered 05/13/21 12:13:54 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
#### Sexton v. Elkhorn Collieries Corporation.

May 13, 1941.

Hawk & Lewis and Emmett G. Fields for appellant.

D. I. Day for appellee.

Opinion of the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner—

Affirming.

Denver Sexton appeals from a judgment confirming the denial of compensation by the Workmen’s Compensation Board.

He testified that he was struck in the face by some coal and particles entered his eye destroying much of the sight. He is corroborated by his father and mother. His doctor found nothing in his eye and attributed his condition to syphilis for which he had been treating Sexton for about a year, although it appears the inflammation of the eye arose rather suddenly and a few weeks after a blood test had shown him to be free of the germ. The doctor stated that the condition could have been caused by trauma as well as by the disease with which he was afflicted. An eye specialist at Hazard found no indication of trauma and expressed the definite opinion that the_ inflammation of the eye was due to syphilis. A doctor living at Norton, Virginia, testified in behalf of the claimant. He had examined his eye nearly a year after Sexton testified he had been injured. He found a cross or squint in the eye and other affections producing an impairment of perhaps fifty percent. Having accepted the patient’s history of being struck by coal, with dust or small particles entering his eye, the doctor had assumed the condition was caused by that accident. In answer to a hypothetical question submitting the record as to the patient’s disease, the doctor testified his condition could have been caused by syphilis as well as by trauma.

*500Upon this evidence and some other circumstances, such as a failure to give notice or make final complaint to the employer at the time, the Board rejected the rec•ommendation of a referee who had reported finding that claimant was entitled to compensation. This conclusion of the whole board was, as they say, from the preponderance of the evidence that Sexton’s condition was not the result of an accident but wholly of disease and that it had not been aggravated by an injury. This is in accordance with Section 4880, Kentucky Statutes, which provides in part that “personal injury by accident as herein defined shall not include diseases except where the disease is the natural and direct result of a traumatic injury by accident, nor shall they include the results of a pre-existing disease,” etc.

We fully concur with the finding of the Compensation Board and the approval by the circuit court.

Judgment affirmed.
#### § 303.207 Availability of resources.

Each application must include a description of the procedure used by the State to ensure that resources are made available under this part for all geographic areas within the State.

(Approved by Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0550)

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1437(a)(7))
Case 16-35977-KRH Doc 11 Filed 12/19/16 Entered 12/19/16 16:38:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 23
Case 16-35977-KRH Doc 11 Filed 12/19/16 Entered 12/19/16 16:38:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 23
Case 16-35977-KRH Doc 11 Filed 12/19/16 Entered 12/19/16 16:38:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 23
Case 16-35977-KRH Doc 11 Filed 12/19/16 Entered 12/19/16 16:38:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 23
Case 16-35977-KRH Doc 11 Filed 12/19/16 Entered 12/19/16 16:38:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 23
Case 16-35977-KRH Doc 11 Filed 12/19/16 Entered 12/19/16 16:38:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 23
Case 16-35977-KRH Doc 11 Filed 12/19/16 Entered 12/19/16 16:38:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 23
Case 16-35977-KRH Doc 11 Filed 12/19/16 Entered 12/19/16 16:38:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 23
Case 16-35977-KRH Doc 11 Filed 12/19/16 Entered 12/19/16 16:38:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 23
Case 16-35977-KRH Doc 11 Filed 12/19/16 Entered 12/19/16 16:38:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 23
Case 16-35977-KRH Doc 11 Filed 12/19/16 Entered 12/19/16 16:38:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 11 of 23
Case 16-35977-KRH Doc 11 Filed 12/19/16 Entered 12/19/16 16:38:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 12 of 23
Case 16-35977-KRH Doc 11 Filed 12/19/16 Entered 12/19/16 16:38:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 13 of 23
Case 16-35977-KRH Doc 11 Filed 12/19/16 Entered 12/19/16 16:38:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 14 of 23
Case 16-35977-KRH Doc 11 Filed 12/19/16 Entered 12/19/16 16:38:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 15 of 23
Case 16-35977-KRH Doc 11 Filed 12/19/16 Entered 12/19/16 16:38:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 16 of 23
Case 16-35977-KRH Doc 11 Filed 12/19/16 Entered 12/19/16 16:38:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 17 of 23
Case 16-35977-KRH Doc 11 Filed 12/19/16 Entered 12/19/16 16:38:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 18 of 23
Case 16-35977-KRH Doc 11 Filed 12/19/16 Entered 12/19/16 16:38:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 19 of 23
Case 16-35977-KRH Doc 11 Filed 12/19/16 Entered 12/19/16 16:38:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 20 of 23
Case 16-35977-KRH Doc 11 Filed 12/19/16 Entered 12/19/16 16:38:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 21 of 23
Case 16-35977-KRH Doc 11 Filed 12/19/16 Entered 12/19/16 16:38:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 22 of 23
Case 16-35977-KRH Doc 11 Filed 12/19/16 Entered 12/19/16 16:38:20 Desc Main

 Document Page 23 of 23
The Honorable D. Brook Bartlett, Chief Judge, United States District Court for 1 the Western District of Missouri. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-1106

_____________ Myron Koerner, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Marvin T. Runyon, Postmaster General * of the United States Postal Service, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: June 12, 1997 Filed: June 24, 1997

_____________ Bef ore BOWMAN, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD , Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Myron Koerner, the plaintiff below, appeals the order of the District Court 1 g ranting the motion of the defendant, the Postmaster General, for summary judgment int his action brought under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701-797 b (1994). Koerner challenges the court's decision in a variety of ways. Having reviewed the case, we conclude that the District Court did not err. Koerner has offered no-2-

evidence to show that he is "otherwise qualified" for either of the existing positions in question or that reasonable ac commodation is possible. We reject as legally meritless his argument that the Postal Service had a duty to create for him a position comparable to the high-level management p osition he once held. Similarly, he has shown no basis upon whic h a court could find that he was a victim of unlawful discrimination
. Accordingly, the order of the District Court is AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### §12. United States Postal Service defined

As used in this title, the term "Postal Service" means the United States Postal Service established under title 39, and every officer and employee of that Service, whether or not such officer or employee has taken the oath of office.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 686; Pub. L. 91–375, §6(j)(2), Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 777; Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXV, §3505, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4921.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§301, 360 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §§230, 231, 35 Stat. 1134).

This section consolidates sections 301 and 360 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., with necessary changes in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Pub. L. 101–647 substituted "whether or not such officer or employee has taken the oath of office" for "whether he has taken the oath of office".

1970—Pub. L. 91–375 inserted "United States" before "Postal Service" in section catchline and substituted in text as definition of "Postal Service" the United States Postal Service established under title 39, and every officer and employee of that Service, whether he has taken the oath of office, for prior definition which included the Post Office Department and every employee, thereof, whether or not he has taken the oath of office.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 91–375 effective within 1 year after Aug. 12, 1970, on date established therefor by the Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service and published by it in the Federal Register, see section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 39, Postal Service.
EXHIBIT 32.01

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Ocean Power
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Michael Hopper, as Authorized Signatory of the Company, certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


       /s/ MICHAEL HOPPER
       ---------------------------
Name:  Michael Hopper
Title: Authorized Signatory
Date:  January 31, 2008

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Mary Conway, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The Norcross Brothers Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       4,476,572
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,012
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,678,236
<PP&E>                                         101,826
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,229,873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          356,610
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,667,026
<COMMON>                                        14,750
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,191,487
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,229,873
<SALES>                                        694,398
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               694,398
<CGS>                                          196,906
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  547,390
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (93,289)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,414
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,414
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,414
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .000


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Alexandria Division 

In the Matter of: 

 Chapter 13 

CYNTHIA MICHELLE MROZ-LARSEN 

 Case No. 17-12857-BFK 

 

 Debtor 

AMENDED OBJECTION TO CONFIRMATION OF PLAN, 

Thomas P. Gorman, Chapter 13 Trustee, has filed this amended1 objection to 

confirmation of your Chapter 13 Plan filed August 22, 2017. The cause for this 

objection is as follows: 

Violation of 11 U.S.C. §1325(b)(1)(B) – Disposable Income – Debtor has 

deduction for three vehicles, two of which are driven by and paid for by her 

children, and a 401(K) loan which she has one $200.00 step payment at the end 

of the Plan, it does not correspond in time of amount to any of the four loans. 

 

 

Date: _November 20, 2017_____ ___/s/ Thomas P. Gorman_____ 

 Thomas P. Gorman 

 Chapter 13 Trustee 

 300 N. Washington Street, #400 

 Alexandria, VA 22314 

 (703) 836-2226 

 VSB 26421 

 

1

 This Objection to Confirmation is being amended subsequent to the November 17, 2017 creditors 

meeting to take out preservation objection and amend with Disposable Income objection. 

Case 17-12857-BFK Doc 21 Filed 11/20/17 Entered 11/20/17 16:34:15 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Notice of Objection To Confirmation 

Cynthia Michelle Mroz-Larsen, Case # 17-12857-BFK 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this 20th day of November, 2017, served via ECF authorized 

users or mailed a true copy of the foregoing Objection to Confirmation, Notice of 

Objection and Notice of Hearing to the following parties. 

Cynthia Michelle Mroz-Larsen 

Chapter 13 Debtor 

218 Cedar Lane SE apt 55 

Vienna, VA 22180 

Jeremy Calvin Huang , Esquire 

Attorney for Debtor 

Woehrle Dahlberg Jones Yao PLLC 

10615 Judicial Drive, Suite 102 

Fairfax, VA 22030 

 __/s/ Thomas P. Gorman______ 

 Thomas P. Gorman

Case 17-12857-BFK Doc 21 Filed 11/20/17 Entered 11/20/17 16:34:15 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4921 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4921

     To amend the Foreign Service Act of 1980 to require a certain 
 appointments of chiefs of mission to be from Foreign Service or Civil 
      Service of the Department of State, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 30, 2019

   Mr. Bera introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Foreign Service Act of 1980 to require a certain 
 appointments of chiefs of mission to be from Foreign Service or Civil 
      Service of the Department of State, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Strengthening Traditional American 
Diplomacy Act'' or the ``STAND Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT RELATING TO APPOINTMENT AS A CHIEF OF MISSION.

    Paragraph (2) of section 304(a) of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 
(22 U.S.C. 3944(a)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``or Civil Service of the Department of 
        State'' after ``be accorded to career members of the Service''; 
        and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``Not 
        less than 70 percent of appointments and assignments under this 
        section shall be of career members of Service or Civil Service 
        of the Department, except that this requirement may be waived 
        if the President certifies in writing, on a case by case basis, 
        to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 
        Senate, that a reduction in such percentage is vital to the 
        national security interests of the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
### §1318. Copies of records

Upon payment of the prescribed fee, any person may obtain a certified copy of any official record of the Office of the Administrator that relates to this chapter. That copy shall be admissible in evidence with the same effect as the original.

(Added Pub. L. 105–304, title V, §502, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2913.)