alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 76 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 583
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 76

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine 
                               justices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 19, 2020

   Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Tillis, Ms. McSally, Mr. Wicker, Mrs. 
  Loeffler, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. Perdue, Mr. Daines, Mr. Portman, Ms. 
 Ernst, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Lee, Mr. Cassidy, and Mr. Grassley) introduced 
     the following joint resolution; which was read the first time

                            November 9, 2020

          Read for the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine 
                               justices.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``The Supreme Court of the United States shall be composed of nine 
justices.''.

                                                       Calendar No. 583

116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 76

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine 
                               justices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 9, 2020

          Read for the second time and placed on the calendar
```
Order filed, September 2, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00644-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF M.G., B.G., S.G., AND A.Z., CHILDREN, Appellant

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Washington County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CCL-7739

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the 

termination of the parent-child relationship is at issue

The notice of appeal was filed July 2, 2015. Appellant has established 

indigence or is presumed to be indigent. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(a). The 

reporter’s record was due within 10 days after the notice of appeal was filed. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 35.1(b); 28.4(a)(1). This court granted two extensions of time to 

file the record, which was due August 31, 2015. The record has not been filed.
Appeals in parental termination cases and child protection cases are to be 

brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is 

filed. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a). The trial and appellate courts are jointly 

responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.3(c). The trial court must direct the court reporter to immediately commence 

the preparation of the reporter’s record and must arrange for a substitute reporter, 

if necessary. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.4(b)(1). 

Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely in this accelerated 

appeal, we issue the following order:

We order Sheryl Stapp, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal on or before September 11, 2015. If Sheryl Stapp does not timely file the 

record as ordered, the court will issue an order requiring her to appear at a hearing 

to show cause why the record has not been timely filed and why she should not be 

held in contempt of court for failing to file the record as ordered. Contempt of 

court is punishable by a fine and/or confinement in jail.

PER CURIAM
### Geology of the beryllium deposits in the Thomas Range, Juab County, Utah

By: Mortimer Hay Staatz

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1142M

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (8836 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 30.23 How must a debtor request an opportunity to inspect and copy records relating to a debt? ( a ) If a debtor wants to inspect and copy Department documents relating to the debt, the debtor must: ( 1 ) File a written request to inspect and copy the documents within 20 days after the date of the notice provided under § 30.22; and
( 2 ) File the request at the address specified in that notice.
( b ) A request filed under paragraph (a) of this section must contain: ( 1 ) All information provided to the debtor in the notice under § 30.22 or § 30.33(b) that identifies the debtor and the debt, including the debtor's Social Security number and the program under which the debt arose, together with any corrections of that identifying information; and
( 2 ) A reasonably specific identification of the records the debtor wishes to have available for inspection and copying.
( c ) The Secretary may decline to provide an opportunity to inspect and copy records if the debtor fails to request inspection and copying in accordance with this section.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1880-0515) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3(a)(1) and 1226a-1, 31 U.S.C. 3716(b))
[51 FR 24099, July 1, 1986, as amended at 51 FR 35646, Oct. 7, 1986]
§ 300.515 Timelines and convenience of hearings and reviews. ( a ) The public agency must ensure that not later than 45 days after the expiration of the 30 day period under § 300.510(b), or the adjusted time periods described in § 300.510(c)— ( 1 ) A final decision is reached in the hearing; and
( 2 ) A copy of the decision is mailed to each of the parties.
( b ) The SEA must ensure that not later than 30 days after the receipt of a request for a review— ( 1 ) A final decision is reached in the review; and
( 2 ) A copy of the decision is mailed to each of the parties.
( c ) A hearing or reviewing officer may grant specific extensions of time beyond the periods set out in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section at the request of either party.
( d ) Each hearing and each review involving oral arguments must be conducted at a time and place that is reasonably convenient to the parents and child involved.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1415(f)(1)(B)(ii), 1415(g), 1415(i)(1))
§ 300.39 Special education. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) *Special education* means specially designed instruction, at no cost to the parents, to meet the unique needs of a child with a disability, including— ( i ) Instruction conducted in the classroom, in the home, in hospitals and institutions, and in other settings; and
( ii ) Instruction in physical education.
( 2 ) *Special education* includes each of the following, if the services otherwise meet the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this section— ( i ) Speech-language pathology services, or any other related service, if the service is considered special education rather than a related service under State standards;
( ii ) Travel training; and
( iii ) Vocational education.
( b ) *Individual special education terms defined.* The terms in this definition are defined as follows: ( 1 ) *At no cost* means that all specially-designed instruction is provided without charge, but does not preclude incidental fees that are normally charged to nondisabled students or their parents as a part of the regular education program.
( 2 ) *Physical education* means— ( i ) The development of— ( A ) Physical and motor fitness;
( B ) Fundamental motor skills and patterns; and
( C ) Skills in aquatics, dance, and individual and group games and sports (including intramural and lifetime sports); and
( ii ) Includes special physical education, adapted physical education, movement education, and motor development.
( 3 ) *Specially designed instruction* means adapting, as appropriate to the needs of an eligible child under this part, the content, methodology, or delivery of instruction— ( i ) To address the unique needs of the child that result from the child's disability; and
( ii ) To ensure access of the child to the general curriculum, so that the child can meet the educational standards within the jurisdiction of the public agency that apply to all children.
( 4 ) *Travel training* means providing instruction, as appropriate, to children with significant cognitive disabilities, and any other children with disabilities who require this instruction, to enable them to— ( i ) Develop an awareness of the environment in which they live; and
( ii ) Learn the skills necessary to move effectively and safely from place to place within that environment (e.g., in school, in the home, at work, and in the community).
( 5 ) *Vocational education* means organized educational programs that are directly related to the preparation of individuals for paid or unpaid employment, or for additional preparation for a career not requiring a baccalaureate or advanced degree.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1401(29))
###### Editorial Note on Part 1246

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1246 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and 68 FR 10359, Mar. 5, 2003.

#### § 1246.3 Allegations contested or denied; hearing requested.

If, within the prescribed time following service of the notice pursuant to § 1246.1, the respondent has filed an answer which contests or denies any allegation in the notice, or a hearing is requested, a hearing pursuant to § 1246.5 shall be conducted by an immigration judge, and the requirements contained in §§ 1240.3, 1240.4, 1240.5, 1240.6, 1240.7, and 1240.9 of this chapter shall be followed.
### §7c. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, act Mar. 18, 1950, ch. 72, §3, 64 Stat. 28, related to authorization to sponsor airport projects; use of funds. See section 101501(d) of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
Disposal - Oil and Gas Environmental 

Compliance Conference Appalachian Basin -Washington, PA

M A Y 13 - 14 , 2 0 14
2

Class II-D Injection Wells 

▶ Ohio – 191

▶ Pennsylvania – 7

▶ West Virginia – 70

▶ Texas – 50 ,0 0 0

▶ Injection Rate: 50 0 -2,0 0 0 bbls/ day

*Source: PSU Marcellus Center for Outreach and Research
3

Pennsylvania Class II-D 

Injection Wells 

▶ 7 operating wells

▶ 2 new permits issued

▶ ~3.2 mmbbls of produced water 

disposed of in 20 13 

▶ U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency has primacy

*Source: PSU Marcellus Center for Outreach and Research
4

Pennsylvania Produced Water 

Disposal 

20 13 Distribution

▶ 95 percent injected into 42 of Ohio’s UIC

wells

▶ 4 percent injected into 2 PA UIC wells

▶ 1 percent injected into 4 WV UIC wells

*Source: PSU Marcellus Center for Outreach and Research
5

Ohio Class II-D Injection Wells 

20 13 Statistics

▶ 191 wells 

▶ Injected ~16.3 mmbbls

▶ 51 percent of fluids 

from out of state

▶ Ohio has primacy

*Source: PSU Marcellus Center for Outreach and Research
6

West Virginia Class II-D Injection Wells 

*Source: PSU Marcellus Center for Outreach and Research

▶ West Virginia Department 

of Environmental 

Protection has primacy 

▶ Approximately 70 wells
7

Class II-D Injection Well Limitations 

*Source: PSU Marcellus Center for Outreach and Research

▶ Requires areas with no 

seismic activity 

(Youngstown, OH)

▶ Requires a site assessment 

and aquifer characterization 

to identify suitable sites 

▶ Requires extensive permit 

application and approvals 

▶ Requires compatible waste 

and formation water
8

Class II-D Injection Well Limitations 

*Source: PSU Marcellus Center for Outreach and Research

▶ Suspended solids can plug the injection interval

▶ Corrosive media may react with well components, 

formation, or confining strata 

▶ High iron concentrations may result in fouling

▶ Organic carbon from bacteria can cause fouling 

▶ Organic contaminants can require pretreatment 
9

Evaporation Ponds 

▶ Production water is piped or transported 

▶ Pond is installed on top of compacted clay

▶ HPDEliner with welded seams over 

geomembranes

▶ Popular in semi-arid climates 

▶ Rates up to 1 inch/ day during hottest months
10

Evaporation Ponds - Pros 

▶ Protects groundwater/ direct discharge 

▶ Precipitate good for winter road maintenance

▶ Low cost method of disposal, small flow 

storage

▶ Leak detection systems

▶ Minimal operations and maintenance costs
11

Evaporation Ponds - Cons 

▶ Transport costs

▶ Requires a large, flat site 

▶ Works best in arid, dry climates, not humid 

▶ Works best May thru October

▶ Fencing and netting are necessary to protect 

against human and wildlife interference
12

Thank you!

Ryan Mastowski, EIT

rmastowski@rettew.com
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1720

In re: TERRANCE LAMONT MOORE,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Audita Querela. 

(4:98-cr-00013-H-1)

Submitted: November 2, 2012 Decided: November 7, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrance Lamont Moore, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Terrance Lamont Moore has filed a petition for a writ 

of audita querela in this court, pursuant to the All Writs Act, 

28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2006), seeking to challenge his criminal 

convictions for armed bank robbery. Moore alleges that he has 

been denied relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012). 

A writ of audita querela is not available to a petitioner when 

other avenues of relief are available, such as a motion to 

vacate under § 2255. United States v. Torres, 282 F.3d 1241, 

1245 (10th Cir. 2002); United States v. Johnson, 962 F.2d 579, 

582 (7th Cir. 1992) (explaining that audita querela may not be 

invoked by a defendant challenging the legality of his sentence 

who could otherwise raise that challenge under § 2255). The 

fact that Moore cannot proceed under § 2255 unless he obtains 

authorization from this court to file a successive motion does 

not alter this conclusion. United States v. Valdez–Pacheco, 237 

F.3d 1077, 1080 (9th Cir. 2000) (“We agree with our sister 

circuits . . . that a federal prisoner may not challenge a 

conviction or a sentence by way of a petition for a writ of 

audita querela when that challenge is cognizable under 

§ 2255.”).

Accordingly, we grant Moore’s motion to supplement his 

petition and deny his petition for a writ of audita querela. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
# Official Journal C 433/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 433 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5823 December 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 433

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5823 December 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 433/1 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7797 — Michelin/Fives/JV) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 433/1

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7797 — Michelin/Fives/JV) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 433/2 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 433/2

Euro exchange rates

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 433/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7762 — ArcelorMittal/Financial Entities/Grupo Condesa) (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 433/4 | Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 4 |
| 2015/C 433/5 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 13 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2015/C 433/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7762 — ArcelorMittal/Financial Entities/Grupo Condesa) (
  1
  )

1

3

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2015/C 433/4

Publication of an amendment application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

4

2015/C 433/5

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

13

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 300.707 Use of amounts by Secretary of the Interior. ( a ) *Definitions.* For purposes of §§ 300.707 through 300.716, the following definitions apply: ( 1 ) *Reservation* means Indian Country as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151.
( 2 ) *Tribal governing body* has the definition given that term in 25 U.S.C. 2021(19).
( b ) *Provision of amounts for assistance.* The Secretary provides amounts to the Secretary of the Interior to meet the need for assistance for the education of children with disabilities on reservations aged 5 to 21, inclusive, enrolled in elementary schools and secondary schools for Indian children operated or funded by the Secretary of the Interior. The amount of the payment for any fiscal year is equal to 80 percent of the amount allotted under section 611(b)(2) of the Act for that fiscal year. Of the amount described in the preceding sentence, after the Secretary of the Interior reserves funds for administration under § 300.710, 80 percent must be allocated to such schools by July 1 of that fiscal year and 20 percent must be allocated to such schools by September 30 of that fiscal year.
( c ) *Additional requirement.* With respect to all other children aged 3 to 21, inclusive, on reservations, the SEA of the State in which the reservation is located must ensure that all of the requirements of Part B of the Act are implemented.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1411(h)(1))
Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
Stewart D. Gregg
Senior Securities Counsel
5701 Golden Hills Drive
Minneapolis, MN  55416-1297
(763) 765-2913

April 30, 2008

VIA EDGAR

---------

Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Investment Management
Office of Insurance Products
100 F Street, NE
Washington, D.C. 20549


     RE:     Allianz Life Variable Account B
             File No.  333-95729
             --------------------------------

Dear Sir/Madam:

Pursuant to Securities Act Rule 497(j), I hereby certify that the Prospectus and
Statement of Additional Information that would have been filed under Rule 497(c)
does not differ from that contained in the most recent Post-effective Amendment,
which Amendment has been filed electronically.

If you  have  any  questions  or  comments,  please  feel  free to  contact  the
undersigned.


Sincerely,

Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America


By:  /s/  Stewart D. Gregg
    --------------------------------
          Stewart D. Gregg
#### § 342.4 Answer asserting defense; personal appearance requested.

If the respondent files an answer within the prescribed period asserting a defense to the allegations in the notice, or requests a personal appearance, with or without an answer, the district director shall designate a naturalization examiner to consider the case. The respondent shall be notified that he may appear in person or through counsel with any witnesses and evidence in defense of the allegations, and shall be informed of the date, time, and place for such appearance.
§ 236.24 Severability. ( a ) Any provision of this subpart held to be invalid or unenforceable as applied to any person or circumstance shall be construed so as to continue to give the maximum effect to the provision permitted by law, including as applied to persons not similarly situated or to dissimilar circumstances, unless such holding is that the provision of this subpart is invalid and unenforceable in all circumstances, in which event the provision shall be severable from the remainder of this subpart and shall not affect the remainder thereof.
( b ) The provisions in § 236.21(c)(2) through (4) and § 274a.12(c)(14) and 274a.12(c)(33) are intended to be severable from one another, from this subpart and any grant of forbearance from removal resulting from this subpart, and from any provision referenced in those paragraphs, including such referenced provision's application to persons with deferred action generally.