alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
387 P.2d 103

#### Marvin BOOKER, Petitioner, v. Manuel N. BROWN, Director of Parole, Respondent.

No. 42 HC.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Dec. 5, 1963.

COMPTON, Chief Justice, and CAR-MOD Y, CHAVEZ, NOBLE and MOISE, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that the request for free process be and the same is hereby granted, and the petition for writ of habeas corpus be and the same is hereby denied for the reason that petitioner has not exhausted his remedy in District Court.
- Newsroom        - Press Releases
      - Public Statements
      - Speeches
      - Testimony
      - Spotlight Topics
      - Media Gallery
      - Upcoming Events
      - Webcasts
      - What's New
      - SEC Videos
      - Reports and Publications
      - RSS Feeds
      - Social Media 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

**TIME AND DATE:**  Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission Small Business Capital Formation Advisory Committee on Small and Emerging Companies will hold a public meeting on Thursday April 2, 2020, via video conference.

**PLACE:**  The meeting will begin at 12:00 p.m. (ET) and will be open to the public.  The meeting will be conducted by remote means (videoconference) and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. Members of the public may watch the webcast of the meeting on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov.

**STATUS:**  This Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a majority of the Commission may attend the meeting. 

**MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:**  The agenda for the meeting includes matters relating to the effects of COVID-19 on small and emerging companies, which may include a recommendation of the Committee.

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:**  For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: March 30, 2020

Vanessa A. CountrymanSecretary
5102

5115

BJ056b

BJ056a

510122

BJ058

BJ057

BJ057

510122

BJ039

510123a

BJ040

510123b

BJ041 510123b

5129

099

099

BJ100

097

5103

5129

5129

BJ098

5130

BJ096

5103

5105

5105

035

5105

5129 101

5129

5128

5129

BJ033

BJ134

019b

BJ019b

BJ034

BJ019b

BJ029

BJ032

BJ115

030

BJ128

BJ030

004

BJ031

031

031

125

BJ026

BJ027

BJ027

BJ026

026

BJ108

BJ003

BJ002

124

126

127

BJ126

004

BJ004

125

BJ001

001

BJ001

120

006b

114

006a

006a

BJ008

BJ112 113

BJ010

BJ011

BJ012

BJ017

BJ013b

BJ016

BJ015 013b

013b

013b

BJ013a

BJ024

025

023

023

BJ023

021b

021a

021a

BJ111

BJ013a

017

017

013a BJ022

BJ013a

104 013a

BJ013a

BJ019

013a

BJ019b

BJ105

020

102

103

018

106

BJ013a

BJ014

BJ028

028

107

109

110

109

5103

BJ036 036

038

037

5108

5107

5107

5107

5107

132

5107

5107

510120

BJ129

BJ047

5101

5101

047

5101

093

BJ046

5101

5101

BJ095

050

5101

048

BJ049

5101

092

BJ089

091

BJ090

BJ048

BJ133

118

BJ052

BJ051

117

BJ123

BJ123

BJ082

082

BJ062

BJ062

BJ063

061

5134

BJ064

BJ131

BJ060

5134

122

059 121

BJ059

510125a

510125b

BJ083

5115

5114a

5114a

5115

5114a

5114b

086

5102

5102

BJ085

BJ084

510124 5114b

510121a

045

58102b

58102b

088

042

58102b

510121b

087

041

BJ041

044a

BJ044b

58102b

BJ044b

58102a

043

510121a

044a

Roads BJ075 - BJ081

130

Boulder

Sugarloaf

Mountain

Mt

Thompson

Comet

Amazon

Wickes

Corbin

Jefferson

City

Fuller

Boomerang Gulch

Big Limber Gulch

Montana

Tunnels

15

15

Wickes Tunnel

048

094

Corbin Road

Corbin Road

Amazon Road

Boulder Frontage Road

Depot Hill Rd

High Ore Creek Rd

Cataract Creek Rd

6

1 1

1

6

1

6

6

31

36

36

36

31

31

36 31 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data 

for individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by 

BLM. This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product

was developed through digital means and information may be updated without 

notification.

Butte Field Office

Draft RMP/EIS

Butte Field Office

Boulder/Jefferson City Travel

Plan Route Designations

Under Alternative A

012 0.5

Miles

0 50 100 25

Miles

Albers Equal Area NAD83 Projection

Map Shows Alternative A

for the Boulder/Jefferson City

Travel Plan Area

T

6

N

T

7

N

R 5 W R 4 W R 3 W

R 5 W R 4 W R 3 W

T

6

N

T

7

N

Any BLM route that has a 3-digit number should

have the prefix BJ before it (i.e. 039 is BJ039)

Contour Interval is 100 feet

Entire TPA is open to cross country snowmobile travel

Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

Private

State

US Forest Service (USFS)

Travel Plan Area Boundary

Land Ownership

BLM Routes

Open Yearlong

Non-BLM Route

County Access Route

Forest Service Route

Railroad

Other Routes

Interstate

State Highway

February 2007
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of BlastGard International, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the company on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the company’s financial condition and results of operations.






Dated: May 27, 2011
By:
/s/ Michael J. GordonMichael J. Gordon, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
### §81g. Administration, protection, and development

The administration, protection, and development of the aforesaid national park shall be exercised under the direction of the Secretary of the Interior by the National Park Service, subject to the provisions of the Act of August 25, 1916, entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service (U.S.C., title 16, secs. 1–4; 39 Stat. 535), and for other purposes," 1 as amended.

(July 3, 1930, ch. 837, §5, 46 Stat. 856; June 5, 1936, ch. 525, §2, 49 Stat. 1483.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act of August 25, 1916, entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service (U.S.C., title 16, secs. 1–4; 39 Stat. 535), and for other purposes,", referred to in text, is act Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, 39 Stat. 535, known as the National Park Service Organic Act, which enacted sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 100101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Sections 1 to 4 of the Act were repealed and restated as section 1865(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of Title 54 by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 443d of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Act June 5, 1936, changed "Colonial National Monument" to "Colonial National Historical Park".

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

1 See References in Text note below.
§ 628.32 What funding priorities does the Secretary use in evaluating an application for an endowment challenge grant? In evaluating an endowment challenge grant application, the Secretary uses the following two priorities: ( a ) *Recipient or former recipient of a grant under the Strengthening Institutions, Special Needs, Hispanic-Serving Institutions, Strengthening Historically Black Colleges and Universities, or Strengthening Historically Black Graduate Institutions Program.* (Total: 20 points) The Secretary gives 20 points to each applicant who on October 1 of the fiscal year in which the applicant is applying for an endowment challenge grant is a current recipient of a planning or development grant, or was a recipient of a planning or development grant within the five preceding fiscal years, under the Strengthening Institutions, Special Needs, Hispanic-Serving Institutions, Strengthening Historically Black Colleges and Universities, or Strengthening Historically Black Graduate Institutions Program.
( b ) *Need for an endowment challenge grant as measured by the lack of endowment funds.* (Total: 20 points) ( 1 ) The Secretary gives up to 20 total points to an applicant with the greatest need for an endowment challenge grant under this part, as measured by the applicant's lack of endowment funds.
( 2 ) The Secretary gives up to 20 points to the applicant with the lowest market value, at the end of the applicant's fiscal year preceding the year it applies for an endowment challenge grant, of its existing endowment and quasi-endowment fund in relation to the number of full-time equivalent students enrolled at the institution in the fall of the year preceding the year it applies for an endowment challenge grant.
( 3 ) In measuring the applicant's need for an endowment challenge grant, the Secretary excludes real estate from being considered as part of the applicant's existing endowment or quasi-endowment fund.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1840-0531) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1065)
[49 FR 28521, July 21, 1984, as amended at 52 FR 11258, Apr. 8, 1987; 58 FR 11163, Feb. 23, 1993; 59 FR 46175, Sept. 7, 1994]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 285

 272

 260

 253

 272

 275

 277

 270

 292

 243

 215

 245

 262

 266

 260

 278

 270

 280

 254

 286

 296

 301

 271

 252

 261

 269

 288

 318

 301

 262

 272

 259

 253

 246

 248

 259

 238

 221

 227

 185

 178

 206

 216

 215

 213

 212

 204

 201

 200

 198

 233

 278

 198

 192

 188

 220

 242

 260

 262

 212

 281

 264

 257

 249

 261

 269

 264

 238

 259

 210

 198

 224

 236

 232

 236

 234

 227

 227

 215

 235

 259

 290

 224

 213

 228

 241

 257

 289

 273

 234

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 6, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 190

 179

 175

 170

 177

 182

 179

 163

 176

 146

 138

 154

 162

 159

 162

 161

 156

 156

 149

 161

 176

 195

 154

 148

 157

 165

 175

 195

 185

 161

TOTAL 7,324

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
Exhibit 31.2 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Donald F. Walston, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Carolina Investment Partners Limited Partnership; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b) any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls. 

 

Date: March 31, 2005
Report on Survey and Manage Species for the 

Hi Grouse Forest Management Project 

Species: Monadenia (Shastelix) chaceana Berry (Chace Sideband) 

Range: This species is endemic to northern California and southwest Oregon. In 

California, this species has been reported mainly from the Klamath Basin in northern 

Siskiyou County, from the vicinity of Happy Camp east to the Shasta and Little Shasta 

River Drainages, in the Goosenest Ranger District of the Klamath National Forest, with a 

few locations reported as far south and west as Trinity County, on the eastern slopes of 

the Trinity Mountains in the Weaverville Ranger District of Shasta-Trinity National 

Forest. In Oregon, sites occur in southern and eastern Jackson and Douglas Counties, in 

the Klamath-Siskiyou Mountains and the west slopes of the Cascades, north to the 

Umpqua River basin. One site has been reported from the Klamath River Basin in 

southwestern Klamath County, Oregon (Duncan, 2005)1

. 

Specific Habitat: The species is associated with forested and open talus or rocky 

areas. Vegetation types include dry conifer and mixed conifer/hardwood forest 

communities as well as oak communities. Mollusks which inhabit rocky habitats also 

utilize the surrounding forest areas for foraging and dispersal during moist, cool 

conditions. Seasonal deep refugia include talus deposits and outcrops, which contain 

stable interstitial spaces large enough for snails to enter. These seasonal refugia also 

provide protection from fire and predation during inactive periods. Within rocky habitat, 

the species is also associated with subsurface water, herbaceous vegetation and deciduous 

leaf litter. In some forested sites, especially in the OR Cascades Province, the species has 

been found associated with down wood where few rock substrates occur. Areas with 

frequent fire return intervals where rock crevice refugia are available may have 

historically favored this species over other, larger forms of Monadenia. (Duncan, 2005). 

Surveys: Potential habitat for this species was determined to be present within the Hi 

Grouse Forest Management Project area. Protocol mollusk surveys were conducted in 

and around the project area in the fall of 2008. Monadenia chaceana was not found. 

Conclusion: Activities proposed in the Hi Grouse Forest Management Project will not 

impact Monadenia chaceana because protocol surveys did not locate the species. 

/s/ Marynell Oechsner 

Marynell Oechsner June 18, 2009 

Wildlife Biologist 

USDA Forest Service 

TEAMS Enterprise 

 

1

 Duncan, Nancy. 2005. Conservation Assessment for Monadenia (Shastelix) chaceana, Chace Sideband. 

Originally issued as Management Recommendations November 1998. Ted R. Weasma, Author. USDA 

Forest Service Region 6 and USDI Bureau of Land Management, Oregon and Washington.
CVC Water Delivery Records

Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Red indicates Scheduled Data Green indicates Projected Delivery DataBlue indicates Actual Data Deliveries on Behalf of CVC Contractors (80% Allocation)

Jan-12

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Banks 

AF

Article 55 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Banks 

AF

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Tracy 

AF

CVC Water 

Pumped @ 

O'Neill 

AF

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Dos 

Amigos for 

Delivery 

AF

3% Loss 

Between 

Banks and 

O'Neill 

Based on 

Actual 

Pumping

Exchange from 

USBR to DWR in 

O'Neill

Up to 2,400 AF 

Fresno County 

exchange with 

Arvin Edison 

WSD

No Water 

Moving for 

County of Tulare

No Water 

Moving for Hills 

Valley

No Water 

Moving for Tri 

Valley

No Water 

Moving for 

Lower Tule

No Water 

Moving for Pixley

1/1/2012 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 1/2/2012 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 1/3/2012 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 1/4/2012 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 1/5/2012 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 1/6/2012 0 AF 0 AF 500 AF 500 AF 0 AF 0 AF 500 AF 0 AF 1/7/2012 0 AF 0 AF 500 AF 500 AF 0 AF 0 AF 500 AF 0 AF 1/8/2012 0 AF 0 AF 500 AF 500 AF 0 AF 0 AF 500 AF 0 AF 1/9/2012 0 AF 0 AF 500 AF 500 AF 0 AF 0 AF 500 AF 0 AF 

1/10/2012 0 AF 0 AF 700 AF 700 AF 203 AF 0 AF 1,200 AF 200 AF 

1/11/2012 0 AF 0 AF 700 AF 700 AF 203 AF 0 AF 1,200 AF 200 AF 

1/12/2012 0 AF 0 AF 700 AF 700 AF 203 AF 0 AF 1,200 AF 200 AF 1/13/2012 0 AF 0 AF 700 AF 700 AF 203 AF 0 AF 1,200 AF 200 AF 

1/14/2012 0 AF 0 AF 700 AF 700 AF 203 AF 0 AF 500 AF 200 AF 1/15/2012 0 AF 0 AF 700 AF 700 AF 203 AF 0 AF 500 AF 200 AF 1/16/2012 0 AF 0 AF 700 AF 700 AF 203 AF 0 AF 500 AF 200 AF 1/17/2012 0 AF 0 AF 700 AF 700 AF 203 AF 0 AF 500 AF 200 AF 1/18/2012 0 AF 0 AF 700 AF 700 AF 203 AF 0 AF 500 AF 200 AF 1/19/2012 0 AF 0 AF 700 AF 700 AF 203 AF 0 AF 500 AF 200 AF 1/20/2012 0 AF 0 AF 700 AF 700 AF 203 AF 0 AF 500 AF 200 AF 1/21/2012 0 AF 0 AF 700 AF 700 AF 167 AF 0 AF 500 AF 200 AF 1/22/2012 0 AF 0 AF 700 AF 700 AF 0 AF 0 AF 500 AF 0 AF 1/23/2012 0 AF 0 AF 700 AF 700 AF 0 AF 0 AF 500 AF 0 AF 1/24/2012 0 AF 0 AF 700 AF 700 AF 0 AF 0 AF 500 AF 0 AF 

1/25/2012 0 AF 0 AF 700 AF 700 AF 0 AF 0 AF 500 AF 0 AF 1/26/2012 0 AF 0 AF 700 AF 700 AF 0 AF 0 AF 500 AF 0 AF 1/27/2012 0 AF 0 AF 500 AF 500 AF 0 AF 0 AF 500 AF 0 AF 1/28/2012 0 AF 0 AF 500 AF 500 AF 0 AF 0 AF 500 AF 0 AF 1/29/2012 0 AF 0 AF 500 AF 500 AF 0 AF 0 AF 500 AF 0 AF 1/30/2012 0 AF 0 AF 500 AF 500 AF 0 AF 0 AF 500 AF 0 AF 1/31/2012 0 AF 0 AF 500 AF 500 AF 0 AF 0 AF 500 AF 0 AF 

Jan 2012 Total 0 AF 0 AF 16,400 AF 16,400 AF 2,400 AF 0 AF 15,800 AF 2,400 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 

Notes:

V:\~WATER\~SMITH\Cross Valley Canal\03_2011 to 02_2012\Master 03_2011 to 02_2012 CVC Deliveries.xls
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 1012** 

MARY ANN SMELSER KOONCE , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Social Security Administration , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. John A. Gibney , Jr., District Judge. ( 3:12

- cv - 00256

- JAG )

Submitted : February 21, 2013 Decided: February 26, 2013

Before AGEE and DAVIS , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Mary Ann Smelser Koonce, Appellant Pro Se. Yiris E. Cornwall, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia; Robin Perrin Meier, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; David Moskowitz, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Mary Ann Smelser Koonce appeals the district court ’ s
order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss her civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Koonce v. Astrue , No. 3:12

- cv - 00256

- JAG (E.D. Va. Dec.
18, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
§ 34.21 Employer certification. ( a ) Along with a garnishment order, we send to an employer a certification in a form prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury.
( b ) The employer must complete and return the certification to us within the time stated in the instructions for the form.
( c ) The employer must include in the certification information about the debtor's employment status, payment frequency, and disposable pay available for withholding.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3720D)