alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 222.152 When may a local educational agency request reconsideration of a determination? ( a ) ( 1 ) An LEA may request reconsideration of any determination made by the Secretary (or the Secretary's delegatee) under the Act, either in addition to or instead of requesting an administrative hearing under § 222.151.
( 2 ) A request for reconsideration, or actual reconsideration by the Secretary (or the Secretary's delegatee), does not extend the time within which an applicant must file a request for an administrative hearing under § 222.151, unless the Secretary (or the Secretary's delegatee) extends that time limit in writing.
( b ) The Secretary's (or the Secretary's delegatee's) consideration of a request for reconsideration is not prejudiced by a pending request for an administrative hearing on the same matter, or the fact that a matter has been scheduled for a hearing. The Secretary (or the Secretary's delegatee) may, but is not required to, postpone the administrative hearing due to a request for reconsideration.
( c ) The Secretary (or the Secretary's delegatee) may reconsider any determination under the Act concerning a particular party unless the determination has been the subject of an administrative hearing under this part with respect to that party.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7711(a))
[60 FR 50778, Sept. 29, 1995, as amended at 62 FR 35418, July 1, 1997;80 FR 33170, June 11, 2015]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC SS.1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of AdZone Research,  Inc.  (Company) on
Form 10-QSB  (Report)  for the quarter  ended June 30,  2003,  as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof.  I, Charles A. Cardona
III, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify to the
best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Charles A. Cardona III
--------------------------------
Charles A. Cardona III
Chief Executive and
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 11, 2003
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 467

 498

 489

 484

 490

 493

 501

 497

 494

 491

 504

 493

 488

 480

 480

 479

 477

 473

 469

 476

 481

 477

 478

 635

 644

 647

 664

 650

 657

 643

 653

 425

 437

 460

 452

 451

 463

 466

 468

 469

 473

 470

 474

 467

 464

 458

 463

 459

 447

 441

 444

 438

 441

 437

 440

 507

 500

 499

 499

 503

 492

 480

 449

 471

 476

 469

 469

 476

 482

 487

 484

 483

 487

 484

 478

 472

 469

 474

 468

 458

 453

 457

 453

 454

 452

 518

 553

 554

 562

 569

 559

 548

 534

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 293

 307

 310

 306

 306

 310

 314

 317

 315

 314

 317

 315

 311

 308

 306

 309

 305

 299

 296

 298

 296

 297

 295

 336

 358

 358

 363

 368

 361

 355

 346

TOTAL 15,202

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Alexandria Division 

In the Matter of: 

 Chapter 13

E. HUNTER HERRON

AND

FRANCES H. HERRON

 Case No. 18-12802-KHK

 Debtors

WITHDRAWAL 

 I ask that the Clerk of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, Alexandria Division to please withdraw Trustee’s Objection to 

Confirmation filed with this Court on the above captioned matter and scheduled for 

hearing on March 14, 2019. 

_March 12, 2019 _______ _/s/ Thomas P. Gorman ________ 

Dated Thomas P. Gorman 

Chapter 13 Trustee 

300 N. Washington Street, #400 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

(703) 836-2226 

VSB #26421 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this 12th day of March, 2019 served via ECF to authorized 

users or mailed a true copy of the foregoing Withdrawal to the following parties. 

 Robert Weed 

Attorney for Debtor 

Law Offices Of Robert Weed 

1376 Old Bridge Rd. Ste 101-4 

Woodbridge, VA 22192 

 ___/s/ Thomas P. Gorman ______ 

 Thomas P. Gorman 

Case 18-12802-KHK Doc 47 Filed 03/12/19 Entered 03/12/19 10:43:30 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 14,877

 13,930

 13,291

 13,050

 13,107

 13,205

 11,733

 12,363

 12,291

 12,947

 13,557

 14,264

 14,830

 14,900

 15,088

 15,140

 15,044

 14,507

 15,249

 12,616

 12,079

 10,544

 10,337

 8,979

 9,967

 12,324

 11,226

 11,533

 10,833

 11,297

 5,230

 4,723

 4,340

 3,904

 3,986

 3,623

 3,242

 2,958

 4,198

 4,600

 5,620

 6,269

 5,411

 5,120

 6,109

 6,337

 5,539

 4,429

 4,987

 5,291

 5,232

 4,397

 3,724

 2,622

 2,691

 3,220

 1,775

 1,481

 1,399

 1,383

 9,907

 8,983

 8,315

 8,088

 8,331

 8,113

 7,602

 7,644

 8,152

 8,568

 9,324

 9,969

 9,914

 9,733

 10,115

 10,148

 9,340

 8,712

 9,476

 9,038

 8,573

 7,061

 6,397

 5,373

 5,442

 6,488

 6,535

 5,910

 5,447

 5,392

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 6, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit 12.01
  HARTFORD
    LIFE INSURANCE CO.
  COMPUTATION
    OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND EARNINGS
 TO
    COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
  YTD


YTD


YTD


YTD


YTD12/31/09


12/31/08


12/31/07


12/31/06


12/31/05(In millions)Earnings


(3,548
)


(5,840
)


1,145



1,058



1,180Add:Fixed chargesInterest expense


















Interest factor attributable to rentals










2



4



5Total fixed charges










2



4



5Interest credited to contractholders


2,005



1,554



1,840



1,720



1,621Total fixed charges including interest credited to
    contractholders


2,005



1,554



1,842



1,724



1,626Earnings, as defined


(3,548
)


(5,840
)


1,147



1,062



1,185Earnings, as defined, including interest credited to
    contractholders


(1,543
)


(4,296
)


2,987



2,782



2,806Fixed chargesFixed charges above










2



4



5Dividends on subsidiary preferred stock










2







Total fixed charges and preferred dividend requirements














4



5Total fixed charges, interest credited to contractholders and
    preferred dividend requirements


2,005



1,554



1,842



1,724



1,626RatiosEarnings, as defined, to total fixed charges


NM



NM



573.5



265.5



237.0Earnings, as defined, to total fixed charges and preferred
    dividend requirements


NM



NM



573.5



265.5



237.0Earnings, as defined, including interest credited to
    contractholders, to total fixed charges including interest
    credited to contractholders


(0.8
)


(2.8
)


1.6



1.6



1.7Earnings, as defined, including interest credited to
    contractholders, to total fixed charges including interest
    credited to contractholders and preferred dividend requirements


(0.8
)


(2.8
)


1.6



1.6



1.7
§ 222.141 For what types of projects may the Secretary provide assistance under section 8008 of the Act? The types of projects for which the Secretary may provide assistance under section 8008 of the Act during any given year include, but are not restricted to, one or more of the following: ( a ) ( 1 ) Emergency repairs to existing facilities for which the Secretary is responsible under section 8008.
( 2 ) As used in this section, the term *emergency repairs* means those repairs necessary— ( i ) For the health and safety of persons using the facilities;
( ii ) For the removal of architectural barriers to the disabled; or
( iii ) For the prevention of further deterioration of the facilities.
( b ) Renovation of facilities for which the Secretary is responsible under section 8008 to meet the standards of minimum school facilities in exchange for an LEA or another appropriate entity accepting transfer of the Secretary's interest in them under § 222.143.
( c ) Provision of temporary facilities on Federal property pending emergency repairs.
( d ) Construction of replacement minimum school facilities when more cost-effective than renovation and when the replacement facilities are to be transferred to local ownership under § 222.143.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7708)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSELITA MAZARIEGOS REYES,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 15

- 72732

Agency No. A205

- 914

- 319

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 9, 2020 * *

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, TASHIMA, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Joselita Mazariegos Reyes, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying her applications for asylum, withholding of

removal, and relief under the Conventi on Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 13 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 15

- 72732

agency’s factual findings. Garcia

- Milian v. Holder , 755 F.3d 1026, 103 1 (9th Cir.

2014) . We deny the petition for review.

Mazariegos Reyes do es not challenge the agency’s determination that s he

failed to establish eligibility for CAT relief

. See Martinez

- Serrano v. INS , 94 F.3d

1256, 1259

- 60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a

party’s opening brie f are waived). Thus, we deny the petition for review as to

Mazariegos Reyes’ CAT claim.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Mazariegos

Reyes failed to demonstrate a nexus between the harm s he experienced or fears in

Guatemala and a protected ground. See Madrigal v. Holder , 716 F.3d 499, 506

(9th Cir. 2013) (holding that “mistreatment motivated purely by personal

retribution will not give rise to a valid asylum claim”); Ayala v. Holder , 6 40 F.3d

1095, 1097 (9th Cir. 2011) (even if membership in a particular social group is

established, an applicant must still show that “persecution was or will be on

account of [her] membership in such group”)

. Thus, Mazariegos Reyes ’ asylum

and withholding of rem oval claims fail.

The record does not support Mazariegos Reyes’ contentions that the agency

failed to consider ev idence or otherwise erred in its analysis of her claims. See

Najmabadi v. Holder , 597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 2010) (agency need not write a n

exegesis on every contention)

.3 15

- 72732

As state d in the c ourt’s November 24, 2015 order, the temporary stay of

removal remains in place until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
§ 361.215 Under what circumstances are local areas eligible for State Incentive Grants? ( a ) The Governor is not required to award local incentive funds, but is authorized to provide incentive grants to local areas for performance on the primary indicators of performance consistent with WIOA sec. 134(a)(3)(A)(xi).
( b ) The Governor may use non-Federal funds to create incentives for the Local WDBs to implement pay-for-performance contract strategies for the delivery of training services described in WIOA sec. 134(c)(3) or activities described in WIOA sec. 129(c)(2) in the local areas served by the Local WDBs. Pay-for-performance contract strategies must be implemented in accordance with 20 CFR part 683, subpart E and § 361.160.
§ 300.534 Protections for children not determined eligible for special education and related services. ( a ) *General.* A child who has not been determined to be eligible for special education and related services under this part and who has engaged in behavior that violated a code of student conduct, may assert any of the protections provided for in this part if the public agency had knowledge (as determined in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section) that the child was a child with a disability before the behavior that precipitated the disciplinary action occurred.
( b ) *Basis of knowledge.* A public agency must be deemed to have knowledge that a child is a child with a disability if before the behavior that precipitated the disciplinary action occurred— ( 1 ) The parent of the child expressed concern in writing to supervisory or administrative personnel of the appropriate educational agency, or a teacher of the child, that the child is in need of special education and related services;
( 2 ) The parent of the child requested an evaluation of the child pursuant to §§ 300.300 through 300.311; or
( 3 ) The teacher of the child, or other personnel of the LEA, expressed specific concerns about a pattern of behavior demonstrated by the child directly to the director of special education of the agency or to other supervisory personnel of the agency.
( c ) *Exception.* A public agency would not be deemed to have knowledge under paragraph (b) of this section if— ( 1 ) The parent of the child— ( i ) Has not allowed an evaluation of the child pursuant to §§ 300.300 through 300.311; or
( ii ) Has refused services under this part; or
( 2 ) The child has been evaluated in accordance with §§ 300.300 through 300.311 and determined to not be a child with a disability under this part.
( d ) *Conditions that apply if no basis of knowledge.* ( 1 ) If a public agency does not have knowledge that a child is a child with a disability (in accordance with paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section) prior to taking disciplinary measures against the child, the child may be subjected to the disciplinary measures applied to children without disabilities who engage in comparable behaviors consistent with paragraph (d)(2) of this section.
( 2 ) ( i ) If a request is made for an evaluation of a child during the time period in which the child is subjected to disciplinary measures under § 300.530, the evaluation must be conducted in an expedited manner.
( ii ) Until the evaluation is completed, the child remains in the educational placement determined by school authorities, which can include suspension or expulsion without educational services.
( iii ) If the child is determined to be a child with a disability, taking into consideration information from the evaluation conducted by the agency and information provided by the parents, the agency must provide special education and related services in accordance with this part, including the requirements of §§ 300.530 through 300.536 and section 612(a)(1)(A) of the Act.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1415(k)(5))
----

Action brought on 10 September 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities against the French Republic

(Case C-389/04)

(2004/C 273/32)

An action against the French Republic was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 10 September 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by A. Bordes and K. Simonssen, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should declare:

order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

Pursuant to Article 22 of Directive 97/67/EC, the French Republic has designated the Minister for Economic Affairs, Finance and Industry, who is the minister responsible for postal services, as the national regulatory authority for the postal sector. At the same time, this minister is head of the directorates-general for industry, information technology and postal services (DIGITIP) set up within the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Finance and Industry, which performs the duties of supervising La Poste through its subdirectorate for postal services. In the context of a public undertaking, the concept of supervision encompasses certain tasks and responsibilities, connected with the exercise of the right to property and with the economic and financial performance of La Poste, such as the establishment of strategic guidelines, the services to be offered in addition to the universal service and pricing policy in relation to such services, involvement in the selection of board members of the undertaking, acquisition of an interest in other undertakings etc., whose performance should be kept separate from regulatory tasks in order to comply with the requirement of operational independence as laid down by the Postal Directive. This requirement aims to preclude any risk of a conflict of interests arising between the national regulatory authority responsible for adopting legislation applicable to the postal sector and for verifying its implementation, and undertakings offering goods and services in this sector. In the case in question such a conflict of interests exists, since the two tasks are carried out within the same ministry. Consequently, the effectiveness of Article 22, first paragraph, of Directive 97/67/EC is not guaranteed.

Furthermore, the time-limit for transposition of Directive 2002/39/EC expired on 31 December 2002.

----

(1)OJ L 15, 21.1.1998, p. 14.

(2)OJ L 176, 5.7.2002, p. 21.

----
---

---

|**HOME**         | **Plotfiles**This report consists of the geologic map database (GIS database in ArcGIS personal geodatabase format) for the Quaternary and Pliocene Yellowstone Plateau Volcanic Field of Wyoming, Idaho, and Montana, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 729-G.  Printable files for the three geologic map plates and main report text can be downloaded below or from the Professional Paper729-G website.

**Downloadable map files:**
A PDF version of geologic map Plate 1 plate1.pdf
A PDF version of geologic map Plate 2 plate2.pdf
A PDF version of geologic map Plate 3 plate3.pdf
A PDF version of the main report text pp729g.pdf

**Printed copies of the report (PP 729-G) including all three plates are also available from:**
USGS Information Services, Box 25286,
Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225
Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS
e-mail: [email protected]
|---------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|**INTRODUCTION**
|**DATA**        
|**PLOTFILES**   

---

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

# SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION OF O.S. ANDRAS, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
OF ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS GP, LLC THE GENERAL PARTNER OF 
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS OPERATING L.P. AND ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

In
connection with this combined quarterly report of Enterprise Products Partners L.P. and
Enterprise Products Operating L.P. (collectively, the Registrants) on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, O.S. Andras, Chief
Executive Officer of Enterprise Products GP, LLC, the General Partner of the Registrants,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrants.

|       |                                                       
|------ | ------------------------------------------------------
|       | /s/ O.S. Andras                                       
|Name:  | O.S. Andras                                           
|Title: | Chief Executive Officer of Enterprise Products GP, LLC
|       | on behalf of Enterprise Products Operating L.P. and   
|       | Enterprise Products Partners L.P.                     
|       |                                                       
|Date:  | August 13, 2003                                       

A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrants and will be retained by the Registrants
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
### **CHAPTER 10—DIGITAL AUDIO RECORDING DEVICES AND MEDIA**

#### SUBCHAPTER A—DEFINITIONS

Sec.
1001.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER B—COPYING CONTROLS

1002.
Incorporation of copying controls.

#### SUBCHAPTER C—ROYALTY PAYMENTS

1003.
Obligation to make royalty payments.
1004.
Royalty payments.
1005.
Deposit of royalty payments and deduction of expenses.
1006.
Entitlement to royalty payments.
1007.
Procedures for distributing royalty payments.

#### SUBCHAPTER D—PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN INFRINGEMENT ACTIONS, REMEDIES, AND ARBITRATION

1008.
Prohibition on certain infringement actions.
1009.
Civil remedies.
1010.
Determination of certain disputes.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–419, §5(i)(4)(B), Nov. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2369, substituted "Determination" for "Arbitration" in item 1010.
§ 339.2 Monthly reports. ( a ) *Oath administration ceremonies.* Clerks of court will on the first day of each month or immediately following each oath ceremony submit to USCIS a report listing all oath administration ceremonies held and the total number of persons issued the oath at each ceremony, in accordance with USCIS instructions. The report will include a list of persons attending naturalization oath ceremonies during the month, and certified copies of any court orders granting changes of name.
( b ) *Petitions filed for de novo hearings.* The clerk of court must submit to USCIS a monthly report of all persons who have filed *de novo* review petitions before the court. The report shall include each petitioner's name, alien registration number, date of filing of the petition for a *de novo* review, and, once an order has been entered, the disposition.
( c ) *Other proceedings and orders.* The clerk of court must forward to USCIS copies of the records of such other proceedings and other orders instituted on or issued by the court affecting or relating to the naturalization of any person as may be required from time to time.
( d ) *Use of reports for accounting purposes.* State and federal courts may use the reports as a monthly billing document, submitted to USCIS for reimbursement in accordance with section 344(f)(1) of the Act. USCIS will use the information submitted to calculate costs incurred by courts in performing their naturalization functions. State and federal courts will be reimbursed pursuant to terms set forth in annual agreements entered into between DHS and the Administrative Office of United States Courts.
[76 FR 53804, Aug. 29, 2011]