alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 100.6 Compliance information. ( a ) *Cooperation and assistance.* The responsible Department official shall to the fullest extent practicable seek the cooperation of recipients in obtaining compliance with this part and shall provide assistance and guidance to recipients to help them comply voluntarily with this part.
( b ) *Compliance reports.* Each recipient shall keep such records and submit to the responsible Department official or his designee timely, complete and accurate compliance reports at such times, and in such form and containing such information, as the responsible Department official or his designee may determine to be necessary to enable him to ascertain whether the recipient has complied or is complying with this part. For example, recipients should have available for the Department racial and ethnic data showing the extent to which members of minority groups are beneficiaries of and participants in federally-assisted programs. In the case in which a primary recipient extends Federal financial assistance to any other recipient, such other recipient shall also submit such compliance reports to the primary recipient as may be necessary to enable the primary recipient to carry out its obligations under this part.
( c ) *Access to sources of information.* Each recipient shall permit access by the responsible Department official or his designee during normal business hours to such of its books, records, accounts, and other sources of information, and its facilities as may be pertinent to ascertain compliance with this part. Where any information required of a recipient is in the exclusive possession of any other agency, institution or person and this agency, institution or person shall fail or refuse to furnish this information the recipient shall so certify in its report and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. Asserted considerations of privacy or confidentiality may not operate to bar the Department from evaluating or seeking to enforce compliance with this part. Information of a confidential nature obtained in connection with compliance evaluation or enforcement shall not be disclosed except where necessary in formal enforcement proceedings or where otherwise required by law.
( d ) *Information to beneficiaries and participants.* Each recipient shall make available to participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons such information regarding the provisions of this regulation and its applicability to the program for which the recipient receives Federal financial assistance, and make such information available to them in such manner, as the responsible Department official finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by the Act and this regulation.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1870-0500) (Authority: Sec. 601, 602, Civil Rights Act of 1964; 78 Stat. 252; 42 U.S.C. 2000d, 2000d-1)
[45 FR 30918, May 9, 1980, as amended at 53 FR 49143, Dec. 6, 1988; 65 FR 68053, Nov. 13, 2000]
J

- S590 41

- 17

NON

- PRECEDENTIAL DECISION

- SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENN SYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee

v.

ERIC RIDDICK , Appellant No. 3480 EDA 2016

Appeal from the PCRA Order Entered October 14 , 2016 In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Criminal Division at No(s): CP

- 51

- CR

- 0 141361

- 1992

BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., OTT, J., and FITZGERALD, J. *

CONCURRING STATEMENT BY BENDER, P.J.E.: FILED DECEMBER 26, 2017

I join the Majority’s memorandum in its entirety. I write separately only

to express my utmost displeasure with the Post Conviction Relief Act’s failure

to facilitate justice in this case, where it is clear to all that it is likely that an

innocent man sits behind bars for no better reason than a poorly conceived

statute. No system of criminal justice is perfect. However, a system of

criminal justice that prevents the correcti on of obvious errors is easily

improved

– if only the legislature could see fit to do it.

Justice Fitzgerald joins this concurring statement.

____________________________________________

* Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.
#### Jeffrey N. Walts, Respondent, v Barbara Masullo-George et al., Defendants, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 506]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (William R. Roy, J.), entered May 26, 2005. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied that part of the motion of defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it and granted plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment against that defendant.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed with costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking, inter aha, supplementary uninsured motorist (SUM) benefits under a policy of insurance issued by defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) to plaintiff’s parents. State Farm denied plaintiffs claim for SUM benefits based on an exclusion in the policy providing that SUM coverage does not apply “to bodily injury to an insured incurred while occupying a motor vehicle owned by that insured, if such motor vehicle is not insured for SUM coverage.” Supreme Court properly denied that part of the motion of State Farm seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it on the issue of SUM coverage, and granted plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment against State Farm on the issue of SUM coverage. State Farm contends that there is a triable issue of fact whether plaintiff owned the uninsured dirt bike that he was riding when he was injured, and thus whether the exclusion applies. In support of his cross motion, however, plaintiff submitted evidence that he was not the owner of the dirt bike he was riding, and State Farm failed to submit evidentiary proof *1312in admissible form sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see generally Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Present—Hurlbutt, A.EJ., Scudder, Gorski, Centra and Green, JJ.
### §554c. Care of employees' graves

Appropriations for the Forest Service shall be available within such limitations as may be prescribed therein for the expenses of properly caring for the graves of persons who have lost their lives as a result of fighting fires while employed by the Forest Service.

(Sept. 21, 1944, ch. 412, title II, §206, 58 Stat. 736.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as a part of the Department of Agriculture Organic Act of 1944.
### §760c. Studies; authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated from time to time, out of any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such sums, not in excess of $250,000 per annum, as may be necessary to carry out the purposes and objectives of sections 760a to 760c of this title.

(Aug. 25, 1950, ch. 782, §3, 64 Stat. 474.)
388 P.2d 398

#### J. L. GUY, Jr., Petitioners, v. The FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, Respondent.

No. 48 HC.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Jan. 27, 1964.

COMPTON, Chief Justice, and CARMODY, CHAVEZ, NOBLE and MOISE, Justices, concurring.

Order that the motion for removal of habeas corpus to the Supreme Court be and the same is hereby denied for the reason that Anthony Albert, Esq., is advising with the petitioner.
#### § 1200.30 General.

Subject to the provisions of this subpart, the requirements of 49 CFR part 18 and applicable cost principles govern the implementation and management of State highway safety programs and projects carried out under 23 U.S.C. Chapter 4. Cost principles include those referenced in 49 CFR 18.22.
### §5952. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 105–391, title IV, §403, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3504, related to award of concessions contracts. See sections 101911(2) and 101913 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
#### § 303.29 Personally identifiable information.

*Personally identifiable information* means personally identifiable information as defined in 34 CFR 99.3, as amended, except that the term “student” in the definition of personally identifiable information in 34 CFR 99.3 means “child” as used in this part and any reference to “school” means “EIS provider” as used in this part.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1415, 1439)
#### § 51.8 Section 3 coverage.

Under section 3(c) of the Act, a court in voting rights litigation can order as relief that a jurisdiction not subject to the preclearance requirement of section 5 preclear its voting changes by submitting them either to the court or to the Attorney General. Where a jurisdiction is required under section 3(c) to preclear its voting changes, and it elects to submit the proposed changes to the Attorney General for preclearance, the procedures in this part will apply.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       72
                                                                   Exhibit 12(b)
                               Idaho Power Company
                       Consolidated Financial Information
                                        
 Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividend Requirements


                                                    Twelve Months Ended December 31,
                                                         (Thousands of Dollars)
                                            1990      1991      1992      1993      1994      1995
<S>                                      <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>           
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to
 Fixed Charges:
   Consolidated net income               $ 69,241  $ 57,872  $ 59,990  $ 84,464  $ 74,930  $ 86,921

Income taxes:
  Income taxes (includes amounts charged
    to  other  income  and deductions)     26,418    24,321    24,601    38,057    35,307    49,497
   Investment  tax  credit adjustment      (3,184)   (3,177)   (1,439)   (1,583)   (1,064)   (1,086)

      Total  income  taxes                 23,234    21,144    23,162    36,474    34,243    48,412

Income  before  income  taxes              92,475    79,016    83,152   120,938   109,173   135,333

Fixed Charges:
   Interest  on  long-term debt            50,119    54,370    53,408    53,706    51,173    51,146
  Amortization of debt discount,
     expense  and  premium  -  net            309       374       392       507       567       567
    Interest on short-term bank loans       1,027       935       647       220     1,157     3,144
    Other  interest                         2,259     3,297     1,011     2,023     1,537     1,598
    Interest  portion  of  rentals            902       884       683     1,077       794       925

      Total  fixed  charges                54,616    59,860    56,141    57,533    55,228    57,381

    Preferred  dividends  requirements      5,685     6,663     7,611     8,547    10,682    12,392

     Total fixed charges and
        preferred  dividends               60,301    66,523    63,752    66,080    65,910    69,773

Earnings  -  as  defined                 $147,091  $138,876  $139,293  $178,471  $164,401  $192,714

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and
   preferred  dividends                     2.44X     2.09X     2.18X     2.70X     2.49X     2.76X
</TABLE>
§ 214.213 Revocation of approved T nonimmigrant status. ( a ) *Automatic revocation of derivative status.* An approved Application for Derivative T Nonimmigrant Status will be revoked automatically if the family member with an approved derivative application notifies USCIS that they will not apply for admission to the United States. An automatic revocation cannot be appealed.
( b ) *Revocation on notice/grounds for revocation.* USCIS may revoke an approved Application for T Nonimmigrant Status following issuance of a notice of intent to revoke if: ( 1 ) The approval of the application violated the requirements of section 101(a)(15)(T) of the Act or this subpart or involved error in preparation, procedure, or adjudication that led to the approval;
( 2 ) In the case of a T-2 spouse, the applicant's divorce from the T-1 principal applicant has become final;
( 3 ) In the case of a T-1 principal applicant, an LEA with jurisdiction to detect, investigate, or prosecute the acts of severe forms of trafficking in persons notifies USCIS that the applicant has refused to comply with a reasonable request to assist with the detection, investigation, or prosecution of the trafficking in persons and provides USCIS with a detailed explanation in writing; or
( 4 ) The LEA that signed the LEA declaration withdraws it or disavows its contents and notifies USCIS and provides a detailed explanation of its reasoning in writing.
( c ) *Procedures.* ( 1 ) USCIS may revoke an approved application for T nonimmigrant status following a notice of intent to revoke. ( i ) The notice of intent to revoke must be in writing and contain a statement of the grounds for the revocation and the time period allowed for the T nonimmigrant's rebuttal.
( ii ) The T nonimmigrant may submit evidence in rebuttal within 30 days of the notice.
( iii ) USCIS will consider all relevant evidence in determining whether to revoke the approved application for T nonimmigrant status.
( 2 ) If USCIS revokes approval of the previously granted T nonimmigrant status application, USCIS: ( i ) Will provide written notice to the applicant; and
( ii ) May notify the LEA who signed the LEA declaration, any consular officer having jurisdiction over the applicant, or the Office of Refugee Resettlement of the Department of Health and Human Services.
( 3 ) If an applicant appeals the revocation, the decision will not become final until the administrative appeal is decided in accordance with 8 CFR 103.3.
( d ) *Effect of revocation.* Revocation of T-1 nonimmigrant status will terminate the principal's status as a T nonimmigrant and result in automatic termination of any derivative T nonimmigrant status. If a derivative application is pending at the time of revocation of T-1 nonimmigrant status, such pending applications will be denied. Revocation of a T-1 nonimmigrant status or derivative T nonimmigrant status also revokes any waiver of inadmissibility granted in conjunction with such application. The revocation of T-1 nonimmigrant status will have no effect on the annual numerical limit described in § 214.210.
Editorial Note on Part 645
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 645 appear at 65 FR 70311, Nov. 22, 2000.

§ 645.111 Right-of-way. ( a ) Federal participation may be approved for the cost of replacement right-of-way provided: ( 1 ) The utility has the right of occupancy in its existing location beause it holds the fee, an easement, or another real property interest, the damaging or taking of which is compensable in eminent domain, or the acquisition is made in the interest of project economy or is necessary to meet the requirements of the highway project, and
( 2 ) There will be no charge to the project for that portion of the utility's existing right-of-way being transferred to the TD for highway purposes.
( b ) The utility shall determine and make a written valuation of the replacement right-of-way that it acquires in order to justify amounts paid for such right-of-way. This written valuation shall be accomplished prior to negotiation for acquisition.
( c ) Acquisition of replacement right-of-way by the TD on behalf of a utility or acquisition of nonoperating real property from a utility shall be in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601 *et seq.*) and applicable right-of-way procedures in 23 CFR 710.203.
( d ) When the utility has the right-of-occupancy in its existing location because it holds the fee, an easement, or another real property interest, and it is not necessary by reason of the highway construction to adjust or replace the facilities located thereon, the taking of and damage to the utility's real property, including the disposal or removal of such facilities, may be considered a right-of-way transaction in accordance with provisions of the applicable right-of-way procedures in 23 CFR 710.203.
[50 FR 20345, May 15, 1985, as amended at 64 FR 71289, Dec. 21, 1999]
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4794 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4794

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 10, 2020

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 8320 13th Avenue in Brooklyn, New York, as the ``Mother Frances 
                 Xavier Cabrini Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MOTHER FRANCES XAVIER CABRINI POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 8320 13th Avenue in Brooklyn, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Mother Frances Xavier Cabrini Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mother 
Frances Xavier Cabrini Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 5, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
### §943c. Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary, $250,000 for each of fiscal years 1993 and 1994 to carry out this chapter.

(Pub. L. 102–440, title II, §205, Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2234.)
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** JUDGMENT Nos. 04 - 18 - 00772 - CV & 04 - 18 - 00773 - CV EX PARTE J.A.B. , Jr. From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 18 - 833 - A & 18 - 834 - A Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ , JUSTICE WATKINS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the orders of the trial court are REVERSED, and judgment is RENDERED denying the petitions for expunction. It is ORDERED tha t appellant, Texas Department of Public Safety, recover its costs of these appeals from appellee, J.A.B., Jr. SIGNED October 23 , 2019.

_____________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice
# Administrative Proceedings

The latest Administrative Proceedings from the Securities and Exchange Commission

- Brenda A. Smith Brenda A. Smith
- Michael E. Lewitt Michael E. Lewitt
- Nicholas Tornello, CPA Nicholas Tornello, CPA
- Geluk Capital Management Ltd and Douglas Gerald Fathers Geluk Capital Management Ltd and Douglas Gerald Fathers
- C-Bond Systems, Inc. and Scott Silverman C-Bond Systems, Inc. and Scott Silverman
- Gene Daniel Levoff, Esq. Gene Daniel Levoff, Esq.
- Focus Media Holding Limited and Jason Jiang Focus Media Holding Limited and Jason Jiang
- Nashid Ali and Gainvest Legal Corp. Nashid Ali and Gainvest Legal Corp.
- Eastone Equities, LLC and Kevin Yu Eastone Equities, LLC and Kevin Yu
- Resolute Capital Partners LTD, LLC, Homebound Resources, LLC, Thomas J. Powell, and Stefan T. Toth Resolute Capital Partners LTD, LLC, Homebound Resources, LLC, Thomas J. Powell, and Stefan T. Toth
- Steven Masterson Steven Masterson
- John M. Moretz John M. Moretz
- BF Borgers CPA PC and Benjamin F. Borgers, CPA BF Borgers CPA PC and Benjamin F. Borgers, CPA
- Timothy A. Nemeckay Timothy A. Nemeckay
- Catalyst Capital Advisors LLC 
- Efren Norberto Quiroz Gardea Efren Norberto Quiroz Gardea
- Luis Ricardo Quiroz Gardea Luis Ricardo Quiroz Gardea
- Mark Korb, CA Mark Korb, CA
- William E. Miller William E. Miller
- LM Global Investments LLC, d/b/a Fratarcangeli Wealth Management and Jeffrey M. Fratarcangeli LM Global Investments LLC, d/b/a Fratarcangeli Wealth Management and Jeffrey M. Fratarcangeli
- Mark Borden Mark Borden
- FCA US LLC and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V. FCA US LLC and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V.
- Scott Lindell Scott Lindell
- Centaurus Financial, Inc., Ricky A. Mantei and Atul Makharia Centaurus Financial, Inc., Ricky A. Mantei and Atul Makharia
- Exchange Traded Managers Group LLC, et al. Exchange Traded Managers Group LLC, et al.
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3562 — SPORTFIVE/HSG/JV)

(2004/C 278/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 4 November 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
#### §§ 200.59-200.60 [Reserved]
#### § 810.2 Purpose.

The purpose of this regulation is to implement sections 137, 142, and 149 of title 23, U.S.C.
VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AND EMPLOYMENTSERVICES

EDUCATION AND CAREER COUNSELING

Disabilities determined by VA to be related to your military service can lead to monthly non-taxable compensation, enrollment in the 

VA health care system, a 10-point hiring preference for federal employment and other important benefits. Ask your VA 

representative or Veterans Service Organization representative about Disability Compensation, Pension, Health Care, Caregiver

Program, Career Services, Educational Assistance, Home Loan Guaranty, Insurance and/or Dependents and Survivors’ Benefits.

WHAT IS THE EDUCATION AND CAREER COUSELING PROGRAM?

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Education and Career Counseling program (Title 38 U.S.C. 

Chapter 36) offers a great opportunity for transitioning Servicemembers and Veterans to get 

personalized counseling and support to guide their career paths, ensure most effective use of their VA 

benefits, and achieve their goals.

ELIGIBILITY

• Transitioning Servicemembers within six months prior to discharge from active duty 

• Veterans within one year following discharge from active duty 

• Any Servicemember/Veteran eligible for a VA education benefit 

• All current VA education beneficiaries 

SERVICES INCLUDE ASSISTING SERVICEMEMBERS/VETERANS WITH

• Career Choice - understand the best career options based on your interests and capabilities 

• Benefits Coaching - guidance on the effective use of VA benefits and/or other resources to achieve 

education and career goals 

• Personalized Support - Academic or adjustment counseling and personalized support to help remove 

any barriers to success 

APPLICATION PROCESS

To connect with a VA counselor and receive this personalized assistance, apply here 

http://www.vba.va.gov/pubs/forms/VBA-28-8832-ARE.pdf. After we receive your application, we 

will contact you to schedule a time to meet with one of our counselors. 

For additional questions or help, contact VA by calling the nationwide toll free number, 1-800-827-

1000. For hearing impaired, dial 1-800-829-4833.