alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 104.41 Application of this subpart.

Subpart E applies to postsecondary education programs or activities, including postsecondary vocational education programs or activities, that receive Federal financial assistance and to recipients that operate, or that receive Federal financial assistance for the operation of, such programs or activities.

[45 FR 30936, May 9, 1980, as amended at 65 FR 68055, Nov. 13, 2000]
United States Bankruptcy Court

Eastern District of Virginia

Newport News Division

TO:

Michael P. Cotter

Chapter 13 Trustee

870 Greenbrier Circle, Suite 402

Chesapeake, VA 23320

In re: David Glenn Caldwell

Case Number 18−51172−SCS

Chapter 13

YOU ARE ADVISED AS FOLLOWS CONCERNING PAPERS FILED BY YOU WHICH CONTAIN

DEFICIENCIES:

28 − Trustee's Objection to Confirmation of Chapter 13 Plan, Notice of Objection to Confirmation of Plan and Notice

of Scheduled Hearing on this Objection (Re: related document(s)23 Chapter 13 Plan and Related Motions filed by

David Glenn Caldwell) Hearing scheduled for 10/12/2018 at 09:30 AM at Newport News Courtroom, U.S.

Courthouse, 2400 West Avenue, Newport News, VA. Filed by Michael P. Cotter (Harris, Shannon)

REQUIREMENTS OF FORM/PROCESS:

Not accompanied by "Request for Waiver to File by Computer Diskette or Conventionally."* Parties

represented by attorneys and governmental units and institutional entities must file via the Internet or complete

and file a Request for Waiver in order to file by computer diskette or conventionally. Future noncompliant

filings will be forwarded to the Court for determination/appropriate action.

Please prepare and submit to the Court an Order Extending Stay, which may be obtained from the Court's web

site at www.vaeb.uscourts.gov under Bankruptcy Forms.*

MOTION FOR EXPEDITED HEARING [LBR 9013−1(N)]:

Not accompanied by Certification Regarding Request for Expedited Hearing*.

MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM STAY AND/OR CODEBTOR STAY [LBR 4001(a)(1)]:

Not accompanied by proof of service indicating service of motion upon parties required to be served.

Notice as required by LBR 4001(a)−1(C) not clearly stated or conspicuously provided in motion.

Caption of codebtor stay does not clearly state the subsection of 11 U.S.C. 1301 under which party is

proceeding.

NOTICE OF MOTION OR OBJECTION/NOTICE OF HEARING:

Official Form 420A* − Notice of Motion or Objection. The Notice must be in substantial compliance with the

official form and must accompany the Motion or Objection when filed.

Official Form 420B* − Notice of Objection to Claim. The Notice must be in substantial compliance with the

official form and must accompany the objection when filed.

Date, time and/or location omitted or incorrect in Notice of Hearing. Hearing will not appear on the Court

docket.

Notice of Hearing/Response not properly linked to Motion/Application/Objection

 X Continued hearing will not appear on docket; plan stricken.

*A copy of the above−referenced forms may be obtained from the Court's web site at www.vaeb.uscourts.gov

Date: October 11, 2018

[igmotionvDec2016.jsp]

CLERK, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

By /s/ Diana Morehead, Deputy Clerk

Direct Dial Telephone No. 757−222−7573

Case 18-51172-SCS Doc 31 Filed 10/11/18 Entered 10/11/18 08:50:25 Desc

 Checksheet - Motion/NTC Page 1 of 1
### §958. Cooperation with other agencies

#### (a) Coordination of programs

In order to provide coordination between the general annual programs of the commissions and programs of other agencies, relating to the exploration, development, and conservation of fishery resources, the Secretary of State may recommend to the United States Commissioners that they consider the relationship of the commissions' programs to those of such agencies and when necessary arrange, with the concurrence of such agencies, for mutual cooperation between the commissions and such agencies for carrying out their respective programs.

#### (b) Scientific and other programs; facilities and personnel

All agencies of the Federal Government are authorized on request of the commissions to cooperate in the conduct of scientific and other programs, or to furnish facilities and personnel for the purpose of assisting the commissions in the performance of their duties.

#### (c) Facilities and personnel to non-Federal agencies

The commissions are authorized and empowered to supply facilities and personnel to existing non-Federal agencies to expedite research work which in the judgment of the commissions is contributing or will contribute directly to the purposes of the conventions.

(Sept. 7, 1950, ch. 907, §9, 64 Stat. 779.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 724

 662

 647

 647

 464

 570

 559

 525

 536

 528

 536

 520

 512

 504

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 643

 596

 580

 446

 359

 386

 500

 500

 479

 466

 482

 474

 468

 480

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 684

 628

 609

 560

 420

 490

 531

 512

 510

 510

 512

 497

 490

 490

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 12, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 439

 404

 392

 362

 276

 319

 344

 332

 331

 331

 332

 323

 319

 319

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TOTAL 7,443

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean TDS

1 386 249 298 200

2 378 250 299 201

3 374 248 297 200

4 367 247 291 196

5 386 246 313 209

6 404 247 313 209

7 413 246 304 204

8 410 242 287 193

9 430 245 301 202

10 417 245 292 196

11 384 239 290 195

12 303 241 260 177

13 252 240 245 167

14 262 240 248 169

15 274 252 261 177

16 264 250 255 174

17 337 254 278 188

18 392 258 303 203

19 410 272 342 227

20 356 290 322 215

21 358 345 351 233

22 348 307 328 219

23 347 301 331 221

24 351 294 328 219

25 345 312 325 217

26 359 334 350 232

27 350 335 344 229

28 358 350 353 234

29 379 347 365 242

30 410 370 390 257

31 415 383 408 268

Total 9672

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Check 20 

Period: October 2023 Run Date: 11/7/2023
#### § 239.3 Effect of filing notice to appear.

The filing of a notice to appear shall have no effect in determining periods of unlawful presence as defined in section 212(a)(9)(B) of the Act.
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I, Howard L. Ehler, Jr., the Principal Financial Officer/Principal Accounting Officer of Imperial Industries, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



(i)

the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:

March 28, 2011

| |                             
| | ----------------------------
| | /s/ HOWARD L. EHLER, JR.    
| | Howard L. Ehler, Jr.        
| | Principal Financial Officer/
| | Principal Accounting Officer



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
### **CHAPTER 17A—COMMON CARRIER OPERATION UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL OR DRUGS**

Sec.
341.
Definitions.
342.
Operation of a common carrier under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
343.
Presumptions.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-2000             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          86,916                  74,931
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  905,918                 616,843
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (150,000)                (41,539)
<INVENTORY>                                     36,791                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,207,892                 650,235
<PP&E>                                         778,480                 477,461
<DEPRECIATION>                               (305,077)                (44,133)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,188,291               1,766,931
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,040,482               1,131,413
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        11,207                   8,702
<OTHER-SE>                                     136,602               (644,220)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,188,291               1,766,931
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,691,139               1,429,305
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  659,177                 564,222
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,753,338                 975,011
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                278,624               (109,928)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            278,624               (109,928)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   278,624               (109,928)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .02                   (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02                   (.01)


</TABLE>
§ 300.105 Assistive technology. ( a ) Each public agency must ensure that assistive technology devices or assistive technology services, or both, as those terms are defined in §§ 300.5 and 300.6, respectively, are made available to a child with a disability if required as a part of the child's— ( 1 ) Special education under § 300.39;
( 2 ) Related services under § 300.34; or
( 3 ) Supplementary aids and services under §§ 300.42 and 300.114(a)(2)(ii).
( b ) On a case-by-case basis, the use of school-purchased assistive technology devices in a child's home or in other settings is required if the child's IEP Team determines that the child needs access to those devices in order to receive FAPE.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0030) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(1), 1412(a)(12)(B)(i))
[71 FR 46753, Aug. 14, 2006, as amended at 82 FR 29759, June 30, 2017]
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 330 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 330

Instructing the managers on the part of the Senate on the bill S. 1790 
    (116th Congress) to require certain measures to address Federal 
             election interference by foreign governments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2019

  Mr. Van Hollen (for himself, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Durbin, and Ms. Harris) 
 submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Instructing the managers on the part of the Senate on the bill S. 1790 
    (116th Congress) to require certain measures to address Federal 
             election interference by foreign governments.

    Resolved, That the managers on the part of the Senate at the 
conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on the House 
amendment to the bill S. 1790 (116th Congress) are instructed to 
require the appropriate official of the executive branch, after each 
Federal election, to promptly submit to Congress a determination as to 
whether the Government of the Russian Federation, or any other foreign 
government, has interfered in such election and a detailed assessment 
of any such interference that identifies, to the maximum extent 
practicable, the individuals responsible for the interference, and to 
promptly impose sanctions on any foreign government that has been 
determined to have interfered in a Federal election, including 
specified individuals and entities within the territory of that 
government.
                                 <all>
```
#### Vernon D. BURCH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; Bureau of Prisons; Dan L. Dove, Warden, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 01-7929.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 12, 2002.

Decided May 22, 2002.

Vernon D. Burch, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Vernon D. Burch appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. Burch, who had previously filed an unsuccessful 28 *942U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001) motion and an unsuccessful 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244 (West 1994 & Supp.2001) motion for authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, asserted that his conviction and sentence were invalid under *Cage v. Louisiana,*498 U.S. 39, 111 S.Ct. 328, 112 L.Ed.2d 339 (1990), and *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Because the Supreme Court decided *Cage*before Burch was convicted, we find that he could not raise this claim under § 2241. *In re Jones,*226 F.3d 328, 333-34 (4th Cir.2000). Moreover, because his sentence did not exceed the statutory-maximum for his offense of conviction, it does not implicate the concerns raised by *Apprendi. United States v. Kinter,*235 F.3d 192, 201 (4th Cir.2000), *cert. denied,*532 U.S. 937, 121 S.Ct. 1393, 149 L.Ed.2d 316 (2001); *United States v. Angle,*254 F.3d 514, 518 (4th Cir.2001) (en banc), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 309, 151 L.Ed.2d 230 (2001) (No. 01-5838). We therefore affirm the district court’s order denying relief on Burch’s § 2241 petition.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 We grant Burch's motion to supplement the record.
HELIX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

|I, Robert J. Lepofsky, certify that:
|------------------------------------
|1.                                  
|2.                                  
|3.                                  
|4.                                  
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    
|5.                                  
|                                    
|                                    
|                                    



|                       |  |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: January 30, 2004 |  |  | /s/Robert J. Lepofsky                
|                       |  |  |                                      
|                       |  |  | Robert J. Lepofsky                   
|                       |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  |  |
II 

Calendar No. 411 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 495 

[Report No. 116–213] 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 29, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

FEBRUARY 4, 2020 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, with amendments 

[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic] 

AN ACT 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to require 

an annual report on the Office for State and Local 

Law Enforcement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Information 

5 Resource to Strengthen Ties with State and Local Law 

6 Enforcement Act of 2017 2019’’ or the ‘‘FIRST State and 

7 Local Law Enforcement Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 495 RS

1 SEC. 2. ANNUAL REPORT ON OFFICE FOR STATE AND 

2 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT. 

3 Section 2006(b) of the Homeland Security Act of 

4 2002 (6 U.S.C. 607(b)) is amended— 

5 (1) by redesignating paragraph (5) as para6 graph (6); and 

7 (2) by inserting after paragraph (4) the fol8 lowing new paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(5) ANNUAL REPORT.—For each of fiscal 

10 years 2020 through 2024, the Assistant Secretary 

11 for State and Local Law Enforcement shall submit 

12 to the Committee on Homeland Security and the 

13 Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Rep14 resentatives and the Committee on Homeland Secu15 rity and Governmental Affairs and the Committee 

16 on the Judiciary of the Senate a report on the activi17 ties of the Office for State and Local Law Enforce18 ment. Each such report shall include, for the fiscal 

19 year covered by such report, a description of each of 

20 the following: 

21 ‘‘(A) Efforts to coordinate and share infor22 mation regarding Department and component 

23 agency programs with State, local, and Tribal 

24 law enforcement agencies. 

25 ‘‘(B) Efforts to improve information shar26 ing through the Homeland Security Information 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 495 RS

1 Network by appropriate component agencies of 

2 the Department and by State, local, and Tribal 

3 law enforcement agencies. 

4 ‘‘(C) The status of performance metrics 

5 within the Office of for State and Local Law 

6 Enforcement to evaluate the effectiveness of ef7 forts to carry out the activities specified in sub8 section (a). 

9 ‘‘(D) Any feedback from State, local, and 

10 Tribal law enforcement agencies regarding the 

11 Office of for State and Local Law Enforcement, 

12 including the mechanisms utilized to collect 

13 such feedback. 

14 ‘‘(E) Efforts to carry out all other respon15 sibilities of the Office of for State and Local 

16 Law Enforcement.’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 411 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 495 

[Report No. 116–213] 

AN ACT 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to 

and Local Law Enforcement. require an annual report on the Office for State 

FEBRUARY 4, 2020 

Reported with amendments 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>



                                                              Exhibit (10)(f)(2)



                                HUNT CORPORATION

        Executive Officers Who Are Parties to Change in Control Agreement



         The following current Executive Officers of Hunt Corporation are
parties to the aforesaid Change in Control Agreement: John W. Carney, Bradley P.
Johnson, and Dennis S. Pizzica.

         Donald L. Thompson, Chairman, President and CEO of the Company, is not
a party to that Change in Control Agreement, but has change in control
provisions providing for a higher level of benefits in his April 8, 1996
Employment Agreement, as amended.

         All other non-executive officers also are parties to change in control
agreements which are similar to those of Executive Officers, but with lower
levels of benefits.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean TDS

1 456 405 428 281

2 449 400 425 279

3 457 413 432 283

4 451 410 430 282

5 521 392 448 293

6 388 381 383 253

7 454 389 426 279

8 548 455 483 314

9 548 422 479 312

10 530 411 448 293

11 524 438 470 306

12 505 460 476 310

13 519 457 489 318

14 516 464 493 321

15 461 439 447 292

16 529 426 456 298

17 533 459 492 320

18 485 453 467 305

19 477 456 466 304

20 462 416 437 286

21 447 387 409 269

22 412 375 397 261

23 435 357 391 258

24 425 346 378 250

25 448 370 403 265

26 437 378 395 260

27 425 376 399 263

28 412 377 397 261

29 424 343 385 254

30 362 304 329 219

Total 12,958

COMMENT(S): 0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Check 20 

Run Date: 5/2/2024

April 2024
### §1328. Enforcement by Treasury and Postal Service

(a) Regulations.—The Secretary of the Treasury and the United States Postal Service shall separately or jointly issue regulations for the enforcement of the rights set forth in section 1308 with respect to importation. Such regulations may require, as a condition for the exclusion of articles from the United States, that the person seeking exclusion take any one or more of the following actions:

(1) Obtain a court order enjoining, or an order of the International Trade Commission under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 excluding, importation of the articles.

(2) Furnish proof that the design involved is protected under this chapter and that the importation of the articles would infringe the rights in the design under this chapter.

(3) Post a surety bond for any injury that may result if the detention or exclusion of the articles proves to be unjustified.

(b) Seizure and Forfeiture.—Articles imported in violation of the rights set forth in section 1308 are subject to seizure and forfeiture in the same manner as property imported in violation of the customs laws. Any such forfeited articles shall be destroyed as directed by the Secretary of the Treasury or the court, as the case may be, except that the articles may be returned to the country of export whenever it is shown to the satisfaction of the Secretary of the Treasury that the importer had no reasonable grounds for believing that his or her acts constituted a violation of the law.

(Added Pub. L. 105–304, title V, §502, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2916.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), is classified to section 1337 of Title 19, Customs Duties.
#### Western Seed & Irrigation Company v. Robert H. Morton.

Filed January 24, 1900.

No. 9,127.

Pleading: Suketciency: Review: Transcript. An assignment of error relating to the sufficiency of a petition can not he considered, where a copy of the pleading is not included in the transcript.

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Scott, J.

*Affirmed.*

*Joel W. West,*for plaintiff in error.

*Byron G. Burbank*and *Lake, Emnilton & Maxwell, contra.*

Norval, C. J.

This proceeding was instituted in this court to review a decree of the district court of Douglas county. The transcript consists merely of a copy of the decree. A reversal is aslced on the sole gronnd that the petition of the plaintiff below does not state a canse of action. As a copy of the pleading assailed has not been brought to this court, the decree must be

Affirmed.