alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(No. 77-CC-2130

#### James Climons, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 9, 1979.*

Polos, C.J.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that the property in question was lost while in the actual physical possession of the State of Illinois, and that the State is liable as a bailee for the return of that property.

Claimant has shown by a preponderence of the evidence that in September, 1976, an employee of the Stateville Correctional Center took from Claimant an AM-FM radio having a value of $159.00. There was no *742explanation given Claimant for this action, and the radio has never been returned to him.

This Court held in *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*deciding that the State has a duty to exercise reasonable care to safeguard and return an inmate’s property when it takes actual physical possession of such property during the course of the transfer of an inmate between penal institutions.

While bailment is ordinarily a voluntary contractual transaction between bailor and bailee, various types of constructive and involuntary bailments have been recognized:

> “A constructive bailment can be created between an owner of the property and one in possession thereof.” 4A Illinois Law and Practice 550, Bailments, citing *Chesterfield Sewer & Water, Inc., v. Citizens Insurance Co. of New Jersey, et al, 57 Ill. App. 2d 90,207 NE2d 84.*

In *Chesterfield,*The Court quotes from *Woodson v. Hare, 244 Ala. 301, 13 So2d 172, at 174,*as follows:

> “An actual contract or one implied in fact is not always necessary to create a bailment. Where, otherwise than by mutual contract of bailment, one person has lawfully acquired the possession of personal property of another and holds it under circumstances whereby he ought, upon principles of justice, to keep it safely and restore it or deliver it to the owner, such person and the owner of the property are, by operation of law generally treated as bailee and bailor under a contract of bailment, irrespective of whether or not there has been any mutual assent, express or implied, to such relationship.”

The loss or damage to bailed property while in the possession of the bailee raises a presumption of negligence which the bailee must rebut by evidence of due care. The effect of this rule is not to shift the ultimate burden of proof from the bailor to the bailee, but simply to shift the burden of proceeding or going forward with the evidence.

At the trial of this cause the State presented no testimony to explain the disappearance of Claimant’s *743property, and presented no testimony of its freedom from negligence.

It is therefore ordered that Claimant be, and hereby is, awarded the sum of $159.00.
Opinion issued December 6, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-16-00678-CR

———————————

IN RE DEMONTRE GREGORY CLARK, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Demontre Gregory Clark seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court 

to hold a hearing on his motion for new trial.

Because we hold Clark has not shown entitlement to mandamus relief, we 

deny the petition. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Brown.
2

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Alexandria Division

______________________________________________________________________________

In re: )

)

YEON HEE BURGOS ) BANKRUPTCY NO. 16-12949-RGM

)

Debtor ) CHAPTER 7

)

______________________________________________________________________________

YING YU XUAN )

)

Plaintiff ) Adv. Pro No. 16-01213-KHK

)

v. )

)

YEON HEE BURGOS )

)

& )

)

JIN YOUNG KIM )

)

Defendants )

_____________________________________________________________________________

DEFENDANT JIN YOUNG KIM’S PROPOSED TRIAL WITNESS LIST

COMES NOW the Defendant, Jin Young Kim, by counsel and submits her List of 

Proposed Witnesses for Trial.

PROPOSED WITNESSES

1. Jin Young Kim

2. Ying Yu Xuan

3. All Witnesses listed and/or witnesses called by the Plaintiff

4. Such additional rebuttal or impeachment witnesses 

Case 16-01213-KHK Doc 18 Filed 06/04/17 Entered 06/04/17 15:59:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Respectfully submitted this 4

th day of June 2017.

/s/ Michael W. Kim

Michael W. Kim & Associates, P.C.

4600-H Pinecrest Office Park Drive

Alexandria, VA 22312

(703) 914-5624; Fax (703) 914-5625

VSB#35259

Michael@mwkimlaw.com

Attorney for Defendant, Jin Young Kim

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Proposed Trial Witness List was sent to via 

first class mail, postage prepaid on this 4

th day of June 2017 to the following and same was filed 

via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing.

Plaintiff’s attorney:

Jeremy C. Huang

WOEHRLE DAHLBERG JONES YAO PLLC

10615 Judicial Drive, Suite 102

Fairfax, VA 22030

/s/ Michael W. Kim_______________

Michael W. Kim

Case 16-01213-KHK Doc 18 Filed 06/04/17 Entered 06/04/17 15:59:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
#### § 385.30 [Reserved]
<PAGE>

                                  CERTIFICATION
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Steel City Products, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

         The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2002 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:   March 26, 2003                    /s/ Terrance W. Allan
                                           -----------------------
                                           Terrance W. Allan
                                           Chief Executive Officer

Dated:   March 26, 2003                    /s/  Maarten D. Hemsley
                                           -----------------------
                                           Maarten D. Hemsley
                                           Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  9
<LEGEND>
RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1000
<CURRENCY>  U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                 <C>          
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1994  
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1994  
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                               1  
<CASH>                                  406,399  
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                    8,714  
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                        206,802  
<TRADING-ASSETS>                              0  
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>             783,094  
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                1,904,278  
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                  1,831,666  
<LOANS>                               3,818,920  
<ALLOWANCE>                             156,005  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        7,294,469  
<DEPOSITS>                            6,344,337  
<SHORT-TERM>                            173,490  
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                     117,899  
<LONG-TERM>                              21,012  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0  
<PREFERRED>                                   0  
<COMMON>                                246,054  
<OTHER-SE>                              391,677  
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>        7,294,469  
<INTEREST-LOAN>                         307,545  
<INTEREST-INVEST>                       164,459  
<INTEREST-OTHER>                          7,941  
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                        479,945  
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                      169,633  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      178,829  
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                   301,116  
<LOAN-LOSSES>                           (17,869) 
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                       (1,669) 
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                         302,918  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         109,245  
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>              101,460  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0  
<CHANGES>                                     0  
<NET-INCOME>                            101,460  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.80  
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.80  
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                             4.59  
<LOANS-NON>                              22,210  
<LOANS-PAST>                              4,403  
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                          6,024  
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                          12,000  
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                        186,562  
<CHARGE-OFFS>                            31,520  
<RECOVERIES>                             18,832  
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                       156,005  
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                    156,005  
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                           0  
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                  36,700  
                                               

</TABLE>
(No. 76-CC-0271

#### Felton Peck, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 2, 1979.*

*607Cathleen Cohen and Jan Keleher, Attorneys for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Polos, C.J.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois correctional facility, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property which he alleges were lost during his incarceration as a result of negligence by employees of the State of Illinois.

In April, 1974, Claimant was transferred from the Stateville Correctional Center to the Cook County Court Building. Prior to his transfer, Stateville authorities took possession of all property in his cell. When Claimant was transferred back to Stateville in September, 1974, his property was not returned to him.

Claimant alleges that the items of property taken from him included a Smith-Corona typewriter, a photo book and pictures, his sweatshirt, one bar of soap, a pair of socks, bath towels, face towels, pens and postcards, all of which had a value of $154.55.

Claimant also contends that three manuscripts which he had written were also taken by Respondent and not returned to him.He values the manuscripts at $5,000.00, and bases the evaluation on a conversation he had with a representative from the Christian Science Monitor concerning publication of the manuscripts, and an estimate of the number of hours which he worked on them.

*608This Court has held that when the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, it must use reasonable care to protect that property and return it to the inmate . *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl. 1. We*have further held that where the fact of a bailment has been established, a presumption of negligence arises where the State has failed to return an inmate’s property.

Claimant has shown by a preponderance of the evidence, that the State took actual physical possession of his property, and that it failed to return that property. The State has presented no evidence rebutting the presumption of negligence which arises in such circumstances.

We further find that Claimant has established the value of various items of his personal property at $154.55. We are unable, however, to award Claimant monetary damages for the loss of his manuscripts. The only testimony as to their value came from Claimant himself, and was based upon his own estimates of their worth. We do not feel that Claimant has established, by a preponderance of the evidence, the value of those manuscripts.

It is therefore ordered that Claimant be, and hereby is, awarded the sum of $154.55, in full satisfaction of his claim.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

In Re: 

Dari Ann Carver Case # 19-10464-BFK 

REPORT OF DEPOSIT OF UNCLAIMED FUNDS 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3011 and 11 U.S.C. 347, the trustee 

herein submits a check, or checks, payable to the “Clerk, United States Bankruptcy Court” 

representing unclaimed funds to be deposited by the Clerk of the Court into the Treasury 

of the United States. Said funds are subject to withdrawal as provided by 28 U.S.C. 2042 

and shall not escheat under any state law. Unclaimed funds represent the dividend(s) due 

and payable to the entity identified as the original payee on the face of the enclosed 

check(s). 

PAYEE 

DARI ANN CARVER 

474 Estate Avenue 

Warrenton, VA 20186 

AMOUNT 

$2,824.00 

Dated: April 13, 2020 __/s/Thomas P. Gorman ___________ 

Thomas P. Gorman 

300 North Washington Street, Ste. 400 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

(703) 836-2226 

VSB#26421 

Case 19-10464-BFK Doc 41 Filed 04/13/20 Entered 04/13/20 12:37:41 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
# Official Journal C 158/8 Ma

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 158 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 638 May 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 158

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 638 May 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 158/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 158/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
### Cenozoic geology in the Mammoth area, Pinal County, Arizona

By: L. A. Heindl

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1141E

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (3292 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (1655 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (213 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 3**                            (1079 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5037 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 5037

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 3703 North Main Street in Farmville, North Carolina, as the ``Walter 
                      B. Jones, Jr. Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 12, 2019

    Mr. Murphy of North Carolina (for himself, Mr. Butterfield, Mr. 
 Holding, Mr. Price of North Carolina, Ms. Foxx of North Carolina, Mr. 
   Walker, Mr. Rouzer, Mr. Hudson, Mr. Bishop of North Carolina, Mr. 
McHenry, Mr. Meadows, Ms. Adams, and Mr. Budd) introduced the following 
   bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 3703 North Main Street in Farmville, North Carolina, as the ``Walter 
                      B. Jones, Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WALTER B. JONES, JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3703 North Main Street in Farmville, North Carolina, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Walter B. Jones, Jr. Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Walter B. 
Jones, Jr. Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 101.83 Official notice.

Where official notice is taken or is to be taken of a material fact not appearing in the evidence of record, any party, on timely request, shall be afforded an opportunity to show the contrary.
Exhibit 1

Case 17-03348-KRH Doc 1-1 Filed 05/03/17 Entered 05/03/17 22:07:11 Desc 

 Exhibit 1 Page 1 of 2
Assigning Creditors

Aetna

B & B Printing Co., Inc.

Biovendor, LLC

Brenda Sims

Cavalier International Airfrieght, Inc.

Cigna

Cleveland Heart Lab

Cleveland HeartLab, Inc.

Deborah B Camp

Economic Development Authority of the City of Richmond

Entec Systems

Joe Shaheen

KS Dept of Commerce

Laurie JW Goetz

Medical Isotopes, Inc.

MG1 Enterprises, Inc.

Michelle N Stickland

Mobile Phlebotomy Services

Numares

Pro Football

Sun Diagnostics

The Horton Group

United Healthcare Insurance Company

Victoria J Taxter

Virginia Advance Health Services dba AnyLab Test Now

Wako Life Sciences, Inc.

Case 17-03348-KRH Doc 1-1 Filed 05/03/17 Entered 05/03/17 22:07:11 Desc 

 Exhibit 1 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

December 19, 2019

DAILY CVP WATER SUPPLY REPORT

SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 RUN DATE:

RESERVOIR RELEASES IN CUBIC FEET/SECOND

TRINITY

SACRAMENTO

FEATHER

AMERICAN

STANISLAUS

SAN JOAQUIN

LEWISTON

KESWICK

OROVILLE (SWP)

NIMBUS

GOODWIN

FRIANT

RESERVOIR MEDIAN 2018 2019 15

 461

 7,506

 6,000

 1,781

 302

 390

 453

 7,562

 8,000

 2,677

 400

 380

RESERVOIR CAPACITY YR AVG

TRINITY

SHASTA

OROVILLE (SWP)

FOLSOM

NEW MELONES

FED. SAN LUIS

2018 2019

 1,499

 2,405

 1,365

 467

 1,785

 401

 2,043

 3,425

 2,228

 714

 2,033

 464

 15

STORAGE IN MAJOR RESERVOIRS IN THOUSANDS OF ACRE-FEET

MILLERTON 

TOTAL NORTH CVP 

 280 353

 6,557 8,679

2,448

4,552

3,538

977

2,420

966

520

11,363

% OF 15 YR AVG 

RESERVOIR CURRENT

YR AVG

TRINITY

SHASTA

FOLSOM

NEW MELONES

1983

 2,888

 10,794

 6,541

 2,747

 1,621

 7,200

 4,069

 1,749

 15

MILLERTON 2,668 4,705

% OF

ACCUMULATED INFLOW FOR WATER YEAR TO DATE IN THOUSANDS OF ACRE-FEET

WY WY WY 

YR

AVG

 15

2019 1977

DAM YR

RESERVOIR

CURRENT

TRINITY AT

FISH HATCHERY

SACRAMENTO AT 

SHASTA DAM 

AMERICAN AT 

BLUE CANYON

STANISLAUS AT

NEW MELONES

1983

 58.58

 116.63

 105.60

 46.79

 0.38

 0.05

 0.43

 0.00

SAN JOAQUIN AT

HUNTINGTON LK 

 85.00 0.00

ACCUMULATED PRECIPITATION FOR WATER YEAR TO DATE IN INCHES

WY WY WY 

% OF

2019 1977 AVG

AVG

(N YRS)

 225

 2,628

 356

 377

 16.35

 26.44

 18.28

 17.60

 38.33

 89.30

 94.68

 42.47

 57.56

 461

 7,365

 3,500

 1,611

 205

 348

 1,432 143

 2,481

 1,787

 476

 1,379

 312

 271

 6,081

 138

 125

 150

 147

 149

 130

 143

 32.47

 1,224

 5,331

 2,824

 1,143

 1,791

 132

 135

 144

 153

 149

 118

 62.97

 67.68

 27.79

 42.65

 142

 140

 153

 135

 57

 62

 44

 41

 44

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

 LAST 

24 HRS 

WY WY

WY WY

----

----
§ 1275.6 Reservation of funds. ( a ) On October 1 of each fiscal year, if a State has not enacted or is not enforcing a law that complies with § 1275.4, FHWA will reserve an amount equal to 2.5 percent of the funds apportioned to the State for that fiscal year under each of 23 U.S.C. 104(b)(1) and (b)(2).
( b ) The reservation of funds will be made based on proportionate amounts from each of the apportionments under 23 U.S.C. 104(b)(1) and (b)(2). The State's Department of Transportation will have 30 days from the date the funds are reserved under this section to notify FHWA, through the appropriate Division Administrator, if it would like to change the distribution of the amounts reserved between 23 U.S.C. 104(b)(1) and (b)(2).
### Diamond drilling exploration of the Beecher No. 3--Black Diamond pegmatite, Custer County, South Dakota

By: Jack Allison Redden

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1162E

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.