The Office of Analysis, Nutrition and Evaluation 

 

Food Stamp Nutrition Education 

Systems Review 

State Profiles 

United States Food and 

Department of Nutrition 

Agriculture Service 

The Office of Analysis, Nutrition and Evaluation 

Food Stamp Nutrition Education 

Systems Review 

State Profiles 

September 2006

Ritu Tuteja 

Jodi Anthony 

Evan Gordon 

Chris Logan 

Rebecca Ledsky 

Submitted to: 

Ms. Kristen Dowling Hyatt, Project Officer 

U.S. Department of Agriculture 

Food and Nutrition Service 

Office of Analysis, Nutrition and Evaluation 

3101 Park Center Drive 

Alexandria, VA 22302 

Submitted by: 

Abt Associates Inc. 

4550 Montgomery Avenue 

Suite 800 North 

Bethesda, MD 20814

301.634.1700 

Contract No. 43-3198-3-3715 

This study is available on the Food and Nutrition Service web site: http://www.fns.usda.gov/oane 

Table of Contents 

State Profiles 

I. Introduction to Codebook........................................................................... iii 

II. Summary Matrices and Graphs...................................................................1 

Figure 1: Moderate or High Level of SFSA Involvement in Key FSNE Planning 

 Activities by Implementing Agency, FY 2004 ................................................... 2 

Figure 2: SFSA Needs Assessment Activities by State ...................................................... 7 

Figure 3: Type of SFSA Monitoring Activities by State, FY2004 ................................... 10 

Figure 4: Average Outlay per Food Stamp Participant by State, FY 2004....................... 13 

Figure 5: Percent of Counties with Any Food Stamp Nutrition Education Services 

 by State, FY 2004.............................................................................................. 14 

Figure 6: Number of Local Food Stamp Office Involvement and Type of 

 Involvement, FY 2004....................................................................................... 15 

Figure 7: FNS Curricula used by Implementing Agencies, FY 2004 ............................... 18 

Figure 8: Settings where Direct Education was Conducted by Implementing 

 Agencies, FY 2004............................................................................................ 22 

Figure 9: Media Avenues Used by Implementing Agencies in the Conduct 

 of Social Marketing, FY 2004........................................................................... 29 

Figure 10: Dietary Guideline Highly Emphasized by Implementing Agency .................. 31 

Figure 11: Types of Indirect Education by Implementing Agency................................... 40 

Figure 12: Coordination of FSNE with other FNS programs/initiatives by 

 Implementing Agency ..................................................................................... 45 

Figure 13: Formal Partners by Implementing Agency...................................................... 53 

III. State Profiles.................................................................................................61 

Alabama ............................................................................................................................ 62 

Alaska................................................................................................................................ 63 

Arizona .............................................................................................................................. 65 

Arkansas ............................................................................................................................ 67 

California........................................................................................................................... 71 

Colorado ............................................................................................................................ 75 

Connecticut........................................................................................................................ 77 

DC ..................................................................................................................................... 81 

Delaware............................................................................................................................ 83 

Florida ............................................................................................................................... 85 

Georgia .............................................................................................................................. 87 

Hawaii ............................................................................................................................... 91 

Idaho.................................................................................................................................. 93 

Illinois................................................................................................................................ 95 

Indiana............................................................................................................................... 99 

Iowa................................................................................................................................. 101 

Kansas ............................................................................................................................. 105 

Kentucky ......................................................................................................................... 107 
 ii

Table of Contents (continued) 

Louisiana ......................................................................................................................... 109 

Maine................................................................................................................................l11 

Maryland ......................................................................................................................... 115 

Massachusetts.................................................................................................................. 117 

Michigan.......................................................................................................................... 119 

Minnesota ........................................................................................................................ 121 

Mississippi....................................................................................................................... 125 

Missouri........................................................................................................................... 129 

Montana........................................................................................................................... 133 

Nebraska.......................................................................................................................... 135 

Nevada............................................................................................................................. 137 

New Hampshire............................................................................................................... 141

New Jersey ...................................................................................................................... 143 

New Mexico .................................................................................................................... 145 

New York ........................................................................................................................ 147 

North Carolina................................................................................................................. 151 

North Dakota ................................................................................................................... 163 

Ohio................................................................................................................................. 165 

Oklahoma ........................................................................................................................ 167 

Oregon............................................................................................................................. 173 

Pennsylvania.................................................................................................................... 175 

Rhode Island.................................................................................................................... 177 

South Carolina................................................................................................................. 179 

South Dakota ................................................................................................................... 183 

Tennessee ........................................................................................................................ 185 

Texas ............................................................................................................................... 189 

Utah ................................................................................................................................. 201 

Vermont........................................................................................................................... 203 

Virginia............................................................................................................................ 213 

Washington...................................................................................................................... 215 

West Virginia .................................................................................................................. 221 

Wisconsin ........................................................................................................................ 223 

 Wyoming......................................................................................................................... 229 
 iii

I. Introduction to Codebook 

This volume provides a description of some of the key components of Food Stamp Nutrition Education 

(FSNE) by State and implementing agency. The first section of the volume provides a series of summary 

matrices and graphs which provide a side by side comparison of implementing agencies or States. 

The second section of this volume is a detailed FSNE description by State. It first highlights data reported by 

the State agency such as geographic coverage, Federal and non-Federal outlays, and both their, and the local 

food stamp office’s, level of involvement in FSNE. It then highlights data reported by each of the 

implementing agencies. Topics include a description of the service delivery system, coordination, estimates 

of participant demographics, how FSNE was delivered, and evaluation activities. 

Survey data from State food stamp agencies and their FY 2004 FSNE implementing agencies were used to 

create these profiles. Additional data from the FNS National Data Bank were used as noted. The codebook 

for the data is included below. A complete discussion of how data were collected and processed is contained 

in Appendix B of the Food Stamp Nutrition Education Systems Review Report. 

 
 iv

PROFILE CODEBOOK – State Agency

FNS Region Region (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o Southeast 

o Western 

o Mt. Plains 

o Midwest 

o Southwest 

o Mid-Atlantic 

o Northeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget fed_bdgt04 (FNS National Data Bank) 

o Approved Federal Budget, 2004 

Total FSNE Outlays Total_outlays (FNS National Data Bank) 

o Total FSNE Outlays, 2004 

 Federal fed_out4 (FNS National Data Bank) 

o Federal Outlays, 2004 

 Non-Federal Nonfed_out4 (FNS National Data Bank) 

o Non-Federal Outlays, 2004 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant outlay_ratio_fs (computed from outlays and participant 

counts in FNS National Data Bank) 

o Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) 

 outlay_ratio_low_income (computed from outlays in FNS 

National Data Bank and count of persons from Current 

Population Survey) 

o Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services Q6a/Q6b (State Agency Survey) 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement Q1a1--Q1a6 (State Agency Survey) 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Q9a (State Agency Survey) 

o All local food stamp offices were involved in 

some manner 

o Many, but not all, local food stamp offices were 

involved in FSNE 

o Some local food stamp offices were involved in 

FSNE 

o Only a few local food stamp offices were involved 

in FSNE 

o No local food stamp offices were involved in 

FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement Q9b1—Q9b12 (State Agency Survey) 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies Counter of Number of implementing agencies per state 

 
 v

 

PROFILE CODEBOOK – Implementing Agency

Type of Organization Q1b, Q1b_other (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o The Cooperative Extension Service of a LandGrant University 

o A division of a State or territorial health 

department 

o A nutrition or public health 

school/department/college within a university 

o A department or college, other than public health, 

within a university 

o A State Department of Aging or Elderly Services 

o An emergency food provider, such as a food bank 

or pantry 

o A local public health department 

o An independent nutrition education network 

o A Tribal Council or Tribal Health program 

o Other 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Agreement_type, Agreement_other (Implementing Agency 

Survey) 

o Interagency Agreement 

o Contract 

o Memorandum of Understanding 

o Other 

Number of Local Projects Q2b2 (Implementing Agency Survey) 

Number of Subcontractors Q2b1 (Implementing Agency Survey) 

Nutrition Network Q3a (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o Yes/No 

Number of Network Member Organizations Q3h (Implementing Agency Survey) 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners Number of Organizations Listed in Question 8.1, 

Implementing Agency Survey, with which IA had a Formal 

Contract in FFY 2004 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 

 Number of Organizations Listed in Question 9, 

Implementing Agency Survey, with which IA attempted to 

Coordinate FSNE Activities with one of the Listed USDA 

Initiatives 

 

IA FSNE Budget grand53a_total_cln (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o Approved IA FSNE Budget, 2004 

Total Outlays outlay_total_fin (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o Total IA FSNE Outlays, 2004 

 Federal outlay_fed_fin (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o Federal IA Outlays, 2004 

 Non-Federal outlay_nonfed_fin (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o Non-Federal IA Outlays, 2004 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE Q4a1/Q4a2 (Implementing Agency Survey) 
 vi

PROFILE CODEBOOK – Implementing Agency

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or 

More 

 Percent of Respondents that Described Educational Level 

of Staff to be Either Bachelors degree, Masters degree or 

higher, or Registered Dietician with Bachelors degree or 

higher Question 48, Implementing Agency Survey 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training 

 Q49 (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o All required 

o Only some required 

o None required, voluntary certification 

o None required, no certification program available 

o Don’t know, policy varies 

Target Audience Q17 (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o FSP recipients and applicants only 

o FSP recipients and eligibles only (household 

income at or below 130% of poverty) 

o Low income population (household income at or 

below 185% of poverty) 

o Other 

o Don’t know 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age % of respondents for each the following variables 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) Q22a1 (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) Q22a2 (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o Adults (18-59 years) Q22a3 (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) Q22a4 (Implementing Agency Survey) 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status % of respondents for each the following variables 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants Q22f1 (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) Q22f2 (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) Q22f3 (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) Q22f4 (Implementing Agency Survey) 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Q23a1—Q23j2 (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o Aim for a Healthy Weight 

o Be Physically Active each Day 

o Let the Pyramid Guide your Food Choices 

o Choose a Variety of Grains Daily, Especially 

Whole Grains 

o Choose a Variety of Fruits and Vegetables 

o Keep Food Safe to Eat 

o Choose a Diet Low in Saturated Fat and 

Cholesterol and Moderate in Total Fat 

o Choose Beverages and Foods to Moderate Your 

Intake of Sugars 

o Choose and Prepare Foods with Less Salt 

o If You Drink Alcoholic Beverages, Do So In 

Moderation 

 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by 

IA 

Q27 (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o None 
 vii

PROFILE CODEBOOK – Implementing Agency

o A Few 

o Some 

o Most 

o All 

o Don’t Know 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA 

 Q29 (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o None 

o A Few 

o Some 

o Most 

o All 

o Don’t Know 

Materials in Other Languages Q30a-Q30m (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o Arabic 

o Cambodian 

o Chinese 

o French 

o Hindi 

o Hmong 

o Korean 

o Portuguese 

o Russian 

o Spanish 

o Vietnamese 

o Thai 

o Other 

Direct Education Q38a (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o Yes/No 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct 

Education 

 Number of Settings Listed in Question 38.1, Implementing 

Agency Survey, in which IA Conducted Direct Education 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education Q38b1a—Q38bb14b (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o Yes/No 

o One-on-One single session with educator 

o One-on-One multiple sessions with educator 

o Group single session with educator 

o Group multiple sessions with educator 

o Other-Individual (self-taught) 

o Food Stamp Offices: See “Most Typical Mode of Direct Education”

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: See “Most Typical Mode of Direct Education”

o Public schools (K-12): See “Most Typical Mode of Direct Education”

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: See “Most Typical Mode of Direct Education”

o Emergency food assistance sites: See “Most Typical Mode of Direct Education”

o Elderly services site: See “Most Typical Mode of Direct Education”

o WIC clinics: See “Most Typical Mode of Direct Education”

o Health care sites: See “Most Typical Mode of Direct Education”

o Adult education and training sites See “Most Typical Mode of Direct Education”
 viii

PROFILE CODEBOOK – Implementing Agency

o Work sites: See “Most Typical Mode of Direct Education”

o Food stores or other retail outlets: See “Most Typical Mode of Direct Education”

o Homes of FSNE clients: See “Most Typical Mode of Direct Education”

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: See “Most Typical Mode of Direct Education”

o Other: See “Most Typical Mode of Direct Education”

Indirect Education Q39a (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o Yes/No 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 

 Number of Communication Channels Listed in Question 

39.1, Implementing Agency Survey in which IA Undertook 

Indirect Education 

Social Marketing Q37a (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o Yes/No 

 Number of Campaigns Q37b (Implementing Agency Survey) 

 Any Statewide Q37c (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o Yes/No 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 

 Number of Mass or Broadcast Media Avenues Listed in 

Question 37.3, Implementing Agency Survey which IA 

used to Deliver FSNE 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Q19-if response = 1,2, or 3 (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o Yes/No 

 

Proportion of Messages Tested Q25a (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o All messages were tested 

o Some messages were tested 

o No messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Q42 (Implementing Agency Survey) -recalculated 

o Yes/No 

o Direct Education: Q43 (Implementing Agency Survey) -recalculated 

o Yes/No 

o Indirect Education: Q44 (Implementing Agency Survey) -recalculated 

o Yes/No 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome 

Evaluation 

 Q45 (Implementing Agency Survey) 

o All Services 

o Many Services 

o Some Services 

o Few Services 

o No Services 
1

II. Summary Matrices and Graphs 
2

Figure 1. Moderate or High Level of SFSA Involvement in Key FSNE Planning Activities by Implementing Agency

State Implementing Agency Selection of 

Target Audience

Development of 

FSNE Messages 

Identification of 

Message Delivery

Methods and 

Materials 

Selection of 

Local FSNE 

Providers 

I

Alabama Auburn University Alaska University of Alaska Fairbanks, 

Cooperative Extension Service 

Arizona Arizona Department of Health Services X X X Arkansas Family and Consumer Sciences, 

Cooperative Extension Service, University of Arkansas 

X 

Arkansas University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff X California California Department of Health 

Services/California Nutrition Network 

X 

California University of California, Davis X Colorado Colorado State University X X Connecticut CT Department of Public Health Connecticut University of Connecticut, Family Nutrition 

Program 

DC DC Department of Health X Delaware University of Delaware X X X Florida University of Florida X X Georgia University of Georgia, Older Adults X X Georgia University of Georgia Cooperative 

Extension Service 

X X 

Hawaii University of Hawaii, Cooperative 

Extension Service 

X X 

Idaho University of Idaho Extension Nutrition 

Program 
3

State Implementing Agency Selection of 

Target Audience

Development of 

FSNE Messages 

Identification of 

Message Delivery

Methods and 

Materials 

Selection of 

Local FSNE 

Providers 

I

Illinois University of Illinois Extension at UrbanaChampaign X X Illinois University of Illinois at Chicago, Division 

of Community Health 

X X 

Indiana Purdue University Cooperative Extension 

Service 

X X 

Iowa Iowa Nutrition Network; Iowa Department 

of Public Health 

Iowa Iowa State University Extension Kansas Kansas State University/State Department 

of Social and Rehabilitation Services 

Kentucky University of Kentucky X X X Louisiana Louisiana State University X X X X Maine Maine Nutrition Network X Maine University of Maine Cooperative Extension X Maryland Maryland Cooperative Extension Massachusetts University of Massachusetts X X Michigan Michigan State University Extension Minnesota Minnesota Chippewa Tribe Minnesota University of Minnesota College of Human 

Ecology 

Mississippi Alcorn State University X X X X Mississippi Mississippi State University X X X X Missouri Missouri Department of Health and Senior 

Services, Bureau of Nutrition Policy and Education 

X 
4

State Implementing Agency Selection of 

Target Audience

Development of 

FSNE Messages 

Identification of 

Message Delivery

Methods and 

Materials 

Selection of 

Local FSNE 

Providers 

I

Missouri University of Missouri-Columbia X Montana Montana State University X Nebraska University of Nebraska X Nevada Department of Nutrition, University of 

Nevada, Reno 

Nevada University of Nevada Cooperative 

Extension 

New Hampshire UNH Cooperative Extension X X X X New Jersey Rutgers, The State University of New 

Jersey 

New Mexico New Mexico State University, Cooperative 

Extension Service 

X X X 

New York Cornell Cooperative Extension X X X X New York NY Department of Health X X X X North Carolina Forsyth County Health Department X X X X North Carolina Macon County Public Health Center X X X X North Carolina North Carolina A&T State University X X X X North Carolina North Carolina Cooperative Extension - NC 

Nutrition Network 

X X X X 

North Carolina North Carolina Cooperative Extension - 

Partners In Wellness 

X X X X 

North Carolina North Carolina Division of Aging X X X X North Dakota North Dakota State University Extension 

Service 

Ohio Ohio State University Extension X Oklahoma Chickasaw Nation X X X X 
5

State Implementing Agency Selection of 

Target Audience

Development of 

FSNE Messages 

Identification of 

Message Delivery

Methods and 

Materials 

Selection of 

Local FSNE 

Providers 

I

Oklahoma Oklahoma State University Cooperative 

Extension Service 

X X X X 

Oklahoma University of Oklahoma-Department of 

Nutrition Sciences in the College of Allied Health 

X X X X 

Oregon Oregon State University, Extension Family 

and Community Development 

X X X 

Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Nutrition Education Program Rhode Island University of Rhode Island -- -- -- -- South Carolina Clemson University X X X South Carolina South Carolina Department of Health and 

Environmental Control, Office of Public Health Nutrition 

X X X 

South Dakota South Dakota State University Cooperative 

Extension Service 

X 

Tennessee Tennessee State University, Nutrition 

Education Program (NEP) 

X X X 

Tennessee University of Tennessee, Agricultural 

Extension Service Tennessee Nutrition & Consumer Education Program (TNCEP) 

X X X 

Texas Corpus Christi Food Bank X X Texas Houston Food Bank X X Texas San Antonio Food Bank X X Texas South Plains Food Bank X X Texas Tarrant Area Food Bank X X Texas Texas A&M Cooperative Extension Utah Utah State University X X X 
6

State Implementing Agency Selection of 

Target Audience

Development of 

FSNE Messages 

Identification of 

Message Delivery

Methods and 

Materials 

Selection of 

Local FSNE 

Providers 

I

Vermont Bennington Rutland Opportunity Council 

(BROC) 

X X X X 

Vermont Central Vermont Community Action 

Council (CVCAC) 

X X X X 

Vermont Champlain Valley Office of Economic 

Opportunity (CVOEO) 

X X X X 

Vermont University of Vermont X X X X Vermont Vermont Campaign to End Childhood 

Hunger 

X X X X 

Virginia Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State 

University 

X X X 

Washington Department of Social and Health Services, 

Aging and Disability Services Administration 

Washington Washington State Department of Health Washington Washington State University West Virginia West Virginia University Wisconsin Great Lakes Inter-Tribal Council Wisconsin Ho-Chunk Nation Wisconsin University of Wisconsin-Extension Wyoming University of Wyoming X 

TOTAL 54 38 37 26 

*--- missing information 

Source: Implementing Agency Survey 
7

Figure 2. SFSA Needs Assessment Activities by State 

State Participated in 

Needs Assessment 

Planning or 

Formative Research 

Provided Statewide 

Participation or 

Demographic Data on 

Food Stamp 

Recipients 

Provided County or 

Regional 

Participation or 

Demographic Data on 

Food Stamp 

Recipients 

Data on 

Location of 

Local Food 

Stamp 

Offices 

Provided 

information on 

languages spoken 

by FS recipients 

Alabama -- -- -- -- -- Alaska Arizona X X X Arkansas X X X California X X X Colorado X X X Connecticut DC -- -- -- -- -- Delaware -- -- -- -- -- Florida X Georgia X X Hawaii X X Idaho -- -- -- -- -- Illinois X X X X Indiana -- -- -- -- -- Iowa X X Kansas X X X X Kentucky X X X X Louisiana X X X X Maine -- -- -- -- -- Maryland X X X Massachusetts X X X X Michigan -- -- -- -- -- Minnesota X 
8

State Participated in 

Needs Assessment 

Planning or 

Formative Research 

Provided Statewide 

Participation or 

Demographic Data on 

Food Stamp 

Recipients 

Provided County or 

Regional 

Participation or 

Demographic Data on 

Food Stamp 

Recipients 

Data on 

Location of 

Local Food 

Stamp 

Offices 

Provided 

information on 

languages spoken 

by FS recipients 

Mississippi -- -- -- -- -- Missouri Montana X X Nebraska Nevada X New Hampshire X New Jersey -- -- -- -- -- New Mexico -- -- -- -- -- New York X X North Carolina X X X North Dakota X X X Ohio Oklahoma X X X Oregon -- -- -- -- -- Pennsylvania South Carolina -- -- -- -- -- South Dakota -- -- -- -- -- Tennessee X X Texas X X X Utah X X Vermont X X X Virginia X X X X Washington X X X 
9

State Participated in 

Needs Assessment 

Planning or 

Formative Research 

Provided Statewide 

Participation or 

Demographic Data on 

Food Stamp 

Recipients 

Provided County or 

Regional 

Participation or 

Demographic Data on 

Food Stamp 

Recipients 

Data on 

Location of 

Local Food 

Stamp 

Offices 

Provided 

information on 

languages spoken 

by FS recipients 

West Virginia X X Wisconsin X Wyoming TOTAL 6 17 25 20 10 *--- missing information Source: State Agency Survey 
10

Figure 3. Type of SFSA Monitoring Activities by State, FY2004 

State Review of 

quantitative 

data on 

number and 

types of 

individuals 

served 

and/or the 

services 

provided 

Review of 

qualitative data 

supplied by 

FSNE 

implementing 

agency 

On-site 

reviews 

of local 

FSNE 

projects 

Review of final 

FSNE report 

prepared by 

the 

implementing 

agency for FNS 

Review of 

results or 

outcomes 

of FSNE 

activities 

Regular 

meetings with 

implementing 

agency staff 

(e.g., monthly 

or quarterly) to 

review progress 

Interviews with t

implementing 

agency coordina

or other FSNE st

to assess 

accomplishmen

Alabama Alaska X Arizona X X X X Arkansas X X X X California X X Colorado X X Connecticut X X DC Delaware Florida X X X X X Georgia X X X X X Hawaii X X X X X X Idaho X Illinois X X X X X X X Indiana X X X Iowa X X X X Kansas X Kentucky X X Louisiana X X Maine X X X Maryland X X X X X X 
11

State Review of 

quantitative 

data on 

number and 

types of 

individuals 

served 

and/or the 

services 

provided 

Review of 

qualitative data 

supplied by 

FSNE 

implementing 

agency 

On-site 

reviews 

of local 

FSNE 

projects 

Review of final 

FSNE report 

prepared by 

the 

implementing 

agency for FNS 

Review of 

results or 

outcomes 

of FSNE 

activities 

Regular 

meetings with 

implementing 

agency staff 

(e.g., monthly 

or quarterly) to 

review progress 

Interviews with t

implementing 

agency coordina

or other FSNE st

to assess 

accomplishmen

Massachusetts X X X X X X Michigan X X X Minnesota X X X X X Mississippi X X X X Missouri X Montana X X Nebraska Nevada X X X X X X X New Hampshire X X X New Jersey New Mexico X X X X New York X X X X X X X North Carolina X X X X X X North Dakota X X X X X Ohio X X X Oklahoma X X X X X X X Oregon X X X Pennsylvania X X X X South Carolina X X X X X South Dakota X X X Tennessee X X X X X X 
12

State Review of 

quantitative 

data on 

number and 

types of 

individuals 

served 

and/or the 

services 

provided 

Review of 

qualitative data 

supplied by 

FSNE 

implementing 

agency 

On-site 

reviews 

of local 

FSNE 

projects 

Review of final 

FSNE report 

prepared by 

the 

implementing 

agency for FNS 

Review of 

results or 

outcomes 

of FSNE 

activities 

Regular 

meetings with 

implementing 

agency staff 

(e.g., monthly 

or quarterly) to 

review progress 

Interviews with t

implementing 

agency coordina

or other FSNE st

to assess 

accomplishmen

Texas X X X X X X Utah X X Vermont X X X X X Virginia X X X X Washington X X X X West Virginia X X X X X Wisconsin X X X X X Wyoming X X X X X X TOTAL 26 25 21 44 31 16 18 Source: State Agency Survey 
13

Figure 4. Average Outlay per Food Stamp Participant by State, FY 2004 

Average Outlay per Food Stamp Participant

Median = $11.41

$0 $20 $40 $60 $80 

Wyoming

North Dakota

Maine

Minnesota

Wisconsin

California New Hampshire

Kansas

Connecticut

Colorado Pennsylvania

Alabama

Iowa

Missouri Washington

Arizona

New Mexico

Montana

Nebraska Michigan Mississippi

Idaho New Jersey

Massachusetts

Oklahoma

Illinois Virginia

Vermont

New York

South Dakota West Virginia

North Carolina

Arkansas Oregon

Utah Maryland

Tennessee

Nevada

DC

Indiana

Louisiana

Ohio

Florida

Alaska Georgia

Texas

South Carolina Kentucky

Hawaii

Dollars

Source: FNS National Data Bank on November 18, 2005 and are subject to revision 
14

Figure 5. Percent of Counties with Any Food Stamp Nutrition Education Services by State, FY 2004 

Percent of Counties with Food Stamp Nutrition Education by State

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 

Alabama

Arizona

California

Connecticut

DC

Delaware

Hawaii

Illinois Kentucky

Maine

Michigan

Missouri

New Hampshire

New Mexico

North Carolina

North Dakota

South Carolina

South Dakota

Tennessee

Vermont

Wyoming Washington

Minnesota

New York

Virginia

Texas

Massachusetts

Mississippi

OhioUtah

Wisconsin

Kansas

Arkansas

Louisiana Oregon Pennsylvania Maryland

Idaho West Virginia

Indiana Georgia

Oklahoma

Colorado

Montana

New Jersey

Florida

Iowa

Nebraska

Nevada

Percent of Counties

Source: State Agency Survey 
15

Figure 6. Number of Local Food Stamp Office Involvement and Type of Involvement, FY 2004 

For those with “Some” or “More” 

State Number (None, Few, Some, Many, All) 

Involved 

Indirect or Direct Education or 

Social Marketing 

Referral 

Alabama None --* -- Alaska Few -- -- Arizona All X X Arkansas Many X X California Some X X Colorado Many X X Connecticut Some X DC Some X X Delaware -- -- -- Florida Some X X Georgia Some X X Hawaii Many X X Idaho Few -- -- Illinois Some X X Indiana All X Iowa None -- -- Kansas Some X X Kentucky Few -- -- Louisiana Many X X Maine Some X X 
16

For those with “Some” or “More” 

State Number (None, Few, Some, Many, All) 

Involved 

Indirect or Direct Education or 

Social Marketing 

Referral 

Maryland Some X X Massachusetts None -- -- Michigan Many X X Minnesota Many X X Mississippi Many X X Missouri Few -- -- Montana Some X Nebraska Many X X Nevada None -- -- New Hampshire 

Many X X 

New Jersey None -- -- New Mexico All X X New York Many X X North Carolina Few -- -- North Dakota All X X Ohio Many X X Oklahoma Many X X Oregon Some X X Pennsylvania None -- -- South Carolina Some X X 
17

For those with “Some” or “More” 

State Number (None, Few, Some, Many, All) 

Involved 

Indirect or Direct Education or 

Social Marketing 

Referral 

South Dakota All X X Tennessee All X X Texas Some X X Utah Some X X Vermont None -- -- Virginia Some X Washington Few -- -- West Virginia Some X X Wisconsin Few -- -- Wyoming Many X X TOTAL 32 34 *--- missing information Source: State Agency Survey 
18

Figure 7. FNS Curricula used by Implementing Agencies , FY 2004 

State Implementing Agency Changing the Scene: 

Improving the School 

Nutrition 

Environment 

Community 

Nutrition 

Action Kit 

Eat 

Smart. 

Play 

Hard. 

Nibbles 

for 

Health 

Power of 

Helping 

Make H

Eating and 

Decis

Alaska University of Alaska Fairbanks, 

Cooperative Extension Service X 

Arizona Arizona Department of Health 

Services X X X X X 

Arkansas Family and Consumer Sciences, 

Cooperative Extension Service, University of Arkansas 

X X 

Arkansas University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff X X X X California California Department of Health 

Services/California Nutrition Network 

X X X X 

California University of California, Davis X X Colorado Colorado State University Connecticut CT Department of Public Health X X X X Connecticut University of Connecticut, Family 

Nutrition Program X X X X 

DC DC Department of Health X X X X Delaware University of Delaware ---* --- --- --- --- Florida University of Florida X X X Georgia University of Georgia, Older Adults --- --- --- --- --- Georgia University of Georgia Cooperative 

Extension Service X X X X 

Hawaii University of Hawaii, Cooperative 

Extension Service X X X 

Idaho University of Idaho Extension 

Nutrition Program X X X 

Illinois University of Illinois Extension at 

Urbana-Champaign X X X X 

Illinois University of Illinois at Chicago, 

Division of Community Health X X X X X 

Indiana Purdue University Cooperative 

Extension Service --- --- --- --- --- 

Iowa Iowa Nutrition Network; Iowa 

Department of Public Health X X X X X 

Iowa Iowa State University Extension X 
19

State Implementing Agency Changing the Scene: 

Improving the School 

Nutrition 

Environment 

Community 

Nutrition 

Action Kit 

Eat 

Smart. 

Play 

Hard. 

Nibbles 

for 

Health 

Power of 

Helping 

Make H

Eating and 

Decis

Kansas Kansas State University/State 

Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services 

 X X X 

Kentucky University of Kentucky Louisiana Louisiana State University X X X Maine Maine Nutrition Network X X X Maine University of Maine Cooperative 

Extension X 

Maryland Maryland Cooperative Extension X X X X Massachusetts University of Massachusetts X X X X X Michigan Michigan State University 

Extension X X X X 

Minnesota Minnesota Chippewa Tribe X X Minnesota University of Minnesota College of 

Human Ecology X X 

Mississippi Alcorn State University X X X Mississippi Mississippi State University X X X Missouri Missouri Department of Health and 

Senior Services, Bureau of Nutrition Policy and Education 

X X 

Missouri University of Missouri-Columbia X X Montana Montana State University X X X Nebraska University of Nebraska X X X X Nevada Department of Nutrition, University 

of Nevada, Reno X X 

Nevada University of Nevada Cooperative 

Extension 

New Hampshire 

UNH Cooperative Extension X X 

New Jersey Rutgers, The State University of 

New Jersey X X X 

New Mexico New Mexico State University, 

Cooperative Extension Service X X X 

New York Cornell Cooperative Extension --- --- --- --- --- New York NY Department of Health X 
20

State Implementing Agency Changing the Scene: 

Improving the School 

Nutrition 

Environment 

Community 

Nutrition 

Action Kit 

Eat 

Smart. 

Play 

Hard. 

Nibbles 

for 

Health 

Power of 

Helping 

Make H

Eating and 

Decis

North Carolina 

Forsyth County Health Department 

North Carolina 

Macon County Public Health Center X 

North Carolina 

 North Carolina A&T State University X X 

North Carolina 

North Carolina Cooperative Extension - NC Nutrition Network --- --- --- --- --- 

North Carolina 

 North Carolina Cooperative Extension - Partners In Wellness --- --- --- --- --- 

North Carolina 

 North Carolina Division of Aging 

--- --- --- --- --- 

North Dakota North Dakota State University 

Extension Service X X X 

Ohio Ohio State University Extension Oklahoma Chickasaw Nation X Oklahoma Oklahoma State University 

Cooperative Extension Service 

Oklahoma University of OklahomaDepartment of Nutrition Sciences in 

the College of Allied Health 

Oregon Oregon State University, Extension 

Family and Community Development 

 X X X X 

Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Nutrition Education 

Program X X X 

Rhode Island University of Rhode Island South Carolina 

Clemson University X X 

South Carolina 

South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Office of Public Health Nutrition 

South Dakota South Dakota State University 

Cooperative Extension Service X X 

Tennessee Tennessee State University, 

Nutrition Education Program (NEP) X X 
21

State Implementing Agency Changing the Scene: 

Improving the School 

Nutrition 

Environment 

Community 

Nutrition 

Action Kit 

Eat 

Smart. 

Play 

Hard. 

Nibbles 

for 

Health 

Power of 

Helping 

Make H

Eating and 

Decis

Tennessee University of Tennessee, 

Agricultural Extension Service Tennessee Nutrition & Consumer Education Program (TNCEP) 

 X X X 

Texas Corpus Christi Food Bank X X Texas Houston Food Bank Texas San Antonio Food Bank X X Texas South Plains Food Bank --- --- --- --- --- Texas Tarrant Area Food Bank --- --- --- --- --- Texas Texas A&M Cooperative Extension X X Utah Utah State University X X Vermont Bennington Rutland Opportunity 

Council (BROC) X 

Vermont Central Vermont Community 

Action Council (CVCAC) --- --- --- --- --- 

Vermont Champlain Valley Office of 

Economic Opportunity (CVOEO) X X 

Vermont University of Vermont Vermont Vermont Campaign to End 

Childhood Hunger X X 

Virginia Virginia Polytechnic Institute and 

State University X X X 

Washington Department of Social and Health 

Services, Aging and Disability Services Administration 

--- --- --- --- --- 

Washington Washington State Department of 

Health X X X 

Washington Washington State University X X West Virginia West Virginia University Wisconsin Great Lakes Inter-Tribal Council X X Wisconsin Ho-Chunk Nation X Wisconsin University of Wisconsin-Extension X X X X Wyoming University of Wyoming X X X X 

TOTAL 20 31 54 35 28 

*--- missing information Source: Implementing Agency Survey 
22

Figure 8. Settings where Direct Education was Conducted by Implementing Agencies, FY 2004 

State Implementing 

Agency 

Food 

Stamp 

Offices 

Local 

Cooperative 

Extension 

Offices 

Public 

schools 

(K-12)

Youth 

education 

sites 

(preschools, 

day care) 

Emergency

food 

assistance 

sites 

Elderly

services 

site 

WIC 

clinics

Health 

care sites 

Adult 

education 

and 

training 

sites 

Work 

sites

s

or

o

Alaska University of Alaska 

Fairbanks, Cooperative Extension Service 

 X X X X X 

Arizona Arizona Department 

of Health Services 

 X X X X X X 

Arkansas Family and Consumer 

Sciences, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Arkansas 

X X X X X X X 

Arkansas University of 

Arkansas at Pine Bluff 

X X X X X X X 

California California Department 

of Health Services/California Nutrition Network 

X X X X X X X X X 

California University of 

California, Davis 

X X X X X X X 

Colorado Colorado State 

University 

X X X X X X X X 

Connecticut CT Department of 

Public Health 

 X X X X X 

Connecticut University of 

Connecticut, Family Nutrition Program 

 X X X X X X X 

DC DC Department of 

Health 

 X X X X X X X 

Delaware University of 

Delaware 

 -- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 

Florida University of Florida X X X X X X X X X X Georgia University of Georgia, 

Older Adults 

 X 

Georgia University of Georgia 

Cooperative Extension Service 

X X X X X X X X X 
23

State Implementing 

Agency 

Food 

Stamp 

Offices 

Local 

Cooperative 

Extension 

Offices 

Public 

schools 

(K-12)

Youth 

education 

sites 

(preschools, 

day care) 

Emergency

food 

assistance 

sites 

Elderly

services 

site 

WIC 

clinics

Health 

care sites 

Adult 

education 

and 

training 

sites 

Work 

sites

s

or

o

Hawaii University of Hawaii, 

Cooperative Extension Service 

 X X X X X X 

Idaho University of Idaho 

Extension Nutrition Program 

 X X X X X X 

Illinois University of Illinois 

Extension at UrbanaChampaign 

X X X X X X 

Illinois University of Illinois 

at Chicago, Division of Community Health 

 X X X X X X X 

Indiana Purdue University 

Cooperative Extension Service 

 X X X X X X 

Iowa Iowa Nutrition 

Network; Iowa Department of Public Health 

X X X X X 

Iowa Iowa State University 

Extension 

 X X X X X 

Kansas Kansas State 

University/State Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services 

X X X X X X X X 

Kentucky University of 

Kentucky 

X X X X X X X 

Louisiana Louisiana State 

University 

X X X X X X X X X X 

Maine Maine Nutrition 

Network 

 X X X X X X 

Maine University of Maine 

Cooperative Extension 

X X X X X X X 

Maryland Maryland Cooperative 

Extension 

 X X X X X X X 
24

State Implementing 

Agency 

Food 

Stamp 

Offices 

Local 

Cooperative 

Extension 

Offices 

Public 

schools 

(K-12)

Youth 

education 

sites 

(preschools, 

day care) 

Emergency

food 

assistance 

sites 

Elderly

services 

site 

WIC 

clinics

Health 

care sites 

Adult 

education 

and 

training 

sites 

Work 

sites

s

or

o

Massachusetts University of 

Massachusetts 

 X X X X X 

Michigan Michigan State 

University Extension 

 X X X X X X X 

Minnesota Minnesota Chippewa 

Tribe 

 X X X X X 

Minnesota University of 

Minnesota College of Human Ecology 

 X X X X X X X 

Mississippi Alcorn State 

University 

X X X X X X X X X 

Mississippi Mississippi State 

University 

X X X X X X X 

Missouri Missouri Department 

of Health and Senior Services, Bureau of Nutrition Policy and Education 

X X X X 

Missouri University of 

Missouri-Columbia 

X X X X X X 

Montana Montana State 

University 

X X X X X X X 

Nebraska University of 

Nebraska 

X X X X X X X X 

Nevada Department of 

Nutrition, University of Nevada, Reno 

 X X 

Nevada University of Nevada 

Cooperative Extension 

 X X 

New Hampshire 

UNH Cooperative Extension 

X X X X X X X X X 

New Jersey Rutgers, The State 

University of New Jersey 

 X X X X X X X 
25

State Implementing 

Agency 

Food 

Stamp 

Offices 

Local 

Cooperative 

Extension 

Offices 

Public 

schools 

(K-12)

Youth 

education 

sites 

(preschools, 

day care) 

Emergency

food 

assistance 

sites 

Elderly

services 

site 

WIC 

clinics

Health 

care sites 

Adult 

education 

and 

training 

sites 

Work 

sites

s

or

o

New Mexico New Mexico State 

University, Cooperative Extension Service 

X X X X X X X X X 

New York Cornell Cooperative 

Extension 

 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 

New York NY Department of 

Health 

 X 

North Carolina 

Forsyth County Health Department 

 X X 

North Carolina 

Macon County Public Health Center 

X X X X 

North Carolina 

 North Carolina A&T State University 

X X X X X 

North Carolina 

North Carolina Cooperative Extension - NC Nutrition Network 

 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 

North Carolina 

 North Carolina Cooperative Extension - Partners In Wellness 

 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 

North Carolina 

 North Carolina Division of Aging 

 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 

North Dakota North Dakota State 

University Extension Service 

X X X X X X X X X 

Ohio Ohio State University 

Extension 

X X X X X X 

Oklahoma Chickasaw Nation X X Oklahoma Oklahoma State 

University Cooperative Extension Service 

X X X X X X X X X X 

Oklahoma University of OklahomaDepartment of Nutrition 

Sciences in the College of Allied Health 

 X 
26

State Implementing 

Agency 

Food 

Stamp 

Offices 

Local 

Cooperative 

Extension 

Offices 

Public 

schools 

(K-12)

Youth 

education 

sites 

(preschools, 

day care) 

Emergency

food 

assistance 

sites 

Elderly

services 

site 

WIC 

clinics

Health 

care sites 

Adult 

education 

and 

training 

sites 

Work 

sites

s

or

o

Oregon Oregon State 

University, Extension Family and Community Development 

X X X X X X X X 

Pennsylvania Pennsylvania 

Nutrition Education Program 

X X X X X X X 

Rhode Island University of Rhode 

Island 

X X X X X 

South Carolina 

Clemson University X X X X X X X 

South Carolina 

South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Office of Public Health Nutrition 

 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 

South Dakota South Dakota State 

University Cooperative Extension Service 

 X X X X X X 

Tennessee Tennessee State 

University, Nutrition Education Program (NEP) 

 X X X X X X X 

Tennessee University of 

Tennessee, Agricultural Extension Service Tennessee Nutrition & Consumer Education Program (TNCEP) 

X X X X X X X X X 

Texas Corpus Christi Food 

Bank 

 X X X 

Texas Houston Food Bank X 
27

State Implementing 

Agency 

Food 

Stamp 

Offices 

Local 

Cooperative 

Extension 

Offices 

Public 

schools 

(K-12)

Youth 

education 

sites 

(preschools, 

day care) 

Emergency

food 

assistance 

sites 

Elderly

services 

site 

WIC 

clinics

Health 

care sites 

Adult 

education 

and 

training 

sites 

Work 

sites

s

or

o

Texas San Antonio Food 

Bank 

 X X X 

Texas South Plains Food 

Bank 

 X X X 

Texas Tarrant Area Food 

Bank 

Texas Texas A&M 

Cooperative Extension 

X X X X X X X X 

Utah Utah State University --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Vermont Bennington Rutland 

Opportunity Council (BROC) 

 X X 

Vermont Central Vermont 

Community Action Council (CVCAC) 

 X X 

Vermont Champlain Valley 

Office of Economic Opportunity (CVOEO) 

Vermont University of Vermont X X X X Vermont Vermont Campaign to 

End Childhood Hunger 

 X X X X 

Virginia Virginia Polytechnic 

Institute and State University 

 X X X X X X 

Washington Department of Social 

and Health Services, Aging and Disability Services Administration 

 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 

Washington Washington State 

Department of Health 

 X X X X X X X 

Washington Washington State 

University 

 X X 

West Virginia West Virginia 

University 

 X X X X 
28

State Implementing 

Agency 

Food 

Stamp 

Offices 

Local 

Cooperative 

Extension 

Offices 

Public 

schools 

(K-12)

Youth 

education 

sites 

(preschools, 

day care) 

Emergency

food 

assistance 

sites 

Elderly

services 

site 

WIC 

clinics

Health 

care sites 

Adult 

education 

and 

training 

sites 

Work 

sites

s

or

o

Wisconsin Great Lakes InterTribal Council X X X X X X X X Wisconsin Ho-Chunk Nation X X X Wisconsin University of 

Wisconsin-Extension 

X X X X X X X 

Wyoming University of 

Wyoming 

X X X X X X X X 

 TOTAL 34 34 61 57 51 55 51 32 47 10 

*--- missing information Source: Implementing Agency Survey 
29

Figure 9. Media Avenues Used by Implementing Agencies in the Conduct of Social Marketing, FY 2004

State Implementing Agency* Billboards Radio Television Videos, DVDs, or 

audiotapes 

Mass 

Distribution 

through 

Local Food 

Stamp 

Offices 

Mass 

Mailings to 

Individuals 

Newspap

Arizona Arizona Department of Health Services X X X X X Arkansas University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff X X X California California Department of Health 

Services/California Nutrition Network X X X X X 

Colorado Colorado State University Connecticut CT Department of Public Health X X Connecticut University of Connecticut, Family Nutrition 

Program X X 

DC DC Department of Health X Iowa Iowa Nutrition Network; Iowa Department of 

Public Health X X X X 

Maine Maine Nutrition Network X X X X Michigan Michigan State University Extension X X X Minnesota University of Minnesota College of Human 

Ecology X X 

Mississippi Alcorn State University X X X X Missouri Missouri Department of Health and Senior 

Services, Bureau of Nutrition Policy and Education 

X X X 

Nevada University of Nevada Cooperative Extension X New Hampshire

UNH Cooperative Extension X X 

North Carolina

Macon County Public Health Center X X 

Oklahoma Oklahoma State University Cooperative 

Extension Service 

Oklahoma University of Oklahoma-Department of 

Nutrition Sciences in the College of Allied Health 

 X X 

Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Nutrition Education Program X Rhode Island University of Rhode Island X X X X South Carolina

South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Office of Public Health Nutrition 

X X 
30

State Implementing Agency* Billboards Radio Television Videos, DVDs, or 

audiotapes 

Mass 

Distribution 

through 

Local Food 

Stamp 

Offices 

Mass 

Mailings to 

Individuals 

Newspap

Tennessee Tennessee State University, Nutrition 

Education Program (NEP) X X 

Tennessee University of Tennessee, Agricultural 

Extension Service Tennessee Nutrition & Consumer Education Program (TNCEP) 

 X X X X X 

Texas Corpus Christi Food Bank X X Texas South Plains Food Bank X Washington Washington State University 

TOTAL 5 16 12 7 7 4 11 

*Only agencies who indicated use of social marketing were included in this matrix. Source: Implementing Agency Survey 
31

Figure 10. Dietary Guideline Highly Emphasized by Implementing Agency 

State Implementing 

Agency 

Aim for 

a 

healthy 

weight 

Be 

physically 

active 

each day 

Let the 

pyramid 

guide 

your food 

choices 

Choose 

a variety 

of grains 

daily 

Choose a 

variety of 

fruits and 

vegetables 

daily 

Keep 

food 

safe to 

eat 

Choose a 

diet low in 

saturated 

fat & 

cholesterol 

and 

moderate 

in total fat 

Choose 

beverage

and food

to 

moderat

your 

intake o

sugars 

Alaska University of 

Alaska Fairbanks, Cooperative Extension Service 

X X X 

Arizona Arizona 

Department of Health Services 

X X X 

Arkansas Family and 

Consumer Sciences, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Arkansas 

X X X X X X X 

Arkansas University of 

Arkansas at Pine Bluff 

X X X X X X X 

California California 

Department of Health Services/California Nutrition Network 

X -- -- X -- -- -- 

California University of 

California, Davis 

X X X X X X X 

Colorado Colorado State 

University 

X X X X 

Connecticut CT Department of 

Public Health 

X X 

Connecticut University of 

Connecticut, Family Nutrition Program 

-- X X X 
32

State Implementing 

Agency 

Aim for 

a 

healthy 

weight 

Be 

physically 

active 

each day 

Let the 

pyramid 

guide 

your food 

choices 

Choose 

a variety 

of grains 

daily 

Choose a 

variety of 

fruits and 

vegetables 

daily 

Keep 

food 

safe to 

eat 

Choose a 

diet low in 

saturated 

fat & 

cholesterol 

and 

moderate 

in total fat 

Choose 

beverage

and food

to 

moderat

your 

intake o

sugars 

DC DC Department of 

Health 

X X X X X X X 

Delaware University of 

Delaware 

X X X X 

Florida University of 

Florida 

X X X X 

Georgia University of 

Georgia, Older Adults 

X X X X X X X 

Georgia University of 

Georgia Cooperative Extension Service 

X X X X X 

Hawaii University of 

Hawaii, Cooperative Extension Service 

X X 

Idaho University of 

Idaho Extension Nutrition Program 

-- X X -- X X -- 

Illinois University of 

Illinois Extension at UrbanaChampaign 

-- X X X X X 

Illinois University of 

Illinois at Chicago, Division of Community Health 

X X X X X -- 

Indiana Purdue University 

Cooperative Extension Service 

X X X -- 

Iowa Iowa Nutrition 

Network; Iowa Department of Public Health 

-- X X 
33

State Implementing 

Agency 

Aim for 

a 

healthy 

weight 

Be 

physically 

active 

each day 

Let the 

pyramid 

guide 

your food 

choices 

Choose 

a variety 

of grains 

daily 

Choose a 

variety of 

fruits and 

vegetables 

daily 

Keep 

food 

safe to 

eat 

Choose a 

diet low in 

saturated 

fat & 

cholesterol 

and 

moderate 

in total fat 

Choose 

beverage

and food

to 

moderat

your 

intake o

sugars 

Iowa Iowa State 

University Extension 

X X X X 

Kansas Kansas State 

University/State Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services 

X X 

Kentucky University of 

Kentucky 

X X X X 

Louisiana Louisiana State 

University 

X X X X X 

Maine Maine Nutrition 

Network 

X X X X 

Maine University of 

Maine Cooperative Extension 

X X X -- X X X 

Maryland Maryland 

Cooperative Extension 

X -- X -- X 

Massachusetts University of 

Massachusetts 

X X 

Michigan Michigan State 

University Extension 

X X X 

Minnesota Minnesota 

Chippewa Tribe 

X X X X X X X X 

Minnesota University of 

Minnesota College of Human Ecology 

X X -- X X -- X -- 

Mississippi Alcorn State 

University 

X X X X X X 
34

State Implementing 

Agency 

Aim for 

a 

healthy 

weight 

Be 

physically 

active 

each day 

Let the 

pyramid 

guide 

your food 

choices 

Choose 

a variety 

of grains 

daily 

Choose a 

variety of 

fruits and 

vegetables 

daily 

Keep 

food 

safe to 

eat 

Choose a 

diet low in 

saturated 

fat & 

cholesterol 

and 

moderate 

in total fat 

Choose 

beverage

and food

to 

moderat

your 

intake o

sugars 

Mississippi Mississippi State 

University 

X X X X X X 

Missouri Missouri 

Department of Health and Senior Services, Bureau of Nutrition Policy and Education 

-- X -- -- 

Missouri University of 

MissouriColumbia 

X X X 

Montana Montana State 

University 

-- X X X 

Nebraska University of 

Nebraska 

X X X X X 

Nevada Department of 

Nutrition, University of Nevada, Reno 

X X -- X -- 

Nevada University of 

Nevada Cooperative Extension 

X -- 

New Hampshire 

UNH Cooperative Extension 

X X X X X X 

New Jersey Rutgers, The State 

University of New Jersey 

X X X X 

New Mexico New Mexico State 

University, Cooperative Extension Service 

X X X X X 

New York Cornell 

Cooperative Extension 

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
35

State Implementing 

Agency 

Aim for 

a 

healthy 

weight 

Be 

physically 

active 

each day 

Let the 

pyramid 

guide 

your food 

choices 

Choose 

a variety 

of grains 

daily 

Choose a 

variety of 

fruits and 

vegetables 

daily 

Keep 

food 

safe to 

eat 

Choose a 

diet low in 

saturated 

fat & 

cholesterol 

and 

moderate 

in total fat 

Choose 

beverage

and food

to 

moderat

your 

intake o

sugars 

New York NY Department of 

Health 

-- -- -- X -- -- 

North Carolina 

Forsyth County Health Department 

X X -- X -- -- -- 

North Carolina 

Macon County Public Health Center 

X X -- X 

North Carolina 

 North Carolina A&T State University 

X X X 

North Carolina 

North Carolina Cooperative Extension - NC Nutrition Network 

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 

North Carolina 

North Carolina Cooperative Extension - Partners In Wellness 

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 

North Carolina 

North Carolina Division of Aging 

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 

North Dakota North Dakota 

State University Extension Service 

X X X X X 

Ohio Ohio State 

University Extension 

X X 

Oklahoma Chickasaw Nation X -- X Oklahoma Oklahoma State 

University Cooperative Extension Service 

X X X 
36

State Implementing 

Agency 

Aim for 

a 

healthy 

weight 

Be 

physically 

active 

each day 

Let the 

pyramid 

guide 

your food 

choices 

Choose 

a variety 

of grains 

daily 

Choose a 

variety of 

fruits and 

vegetables 

daily 

Keep 

food 

safe to 

eat 

Choose a 

diet low in 

saturated 

fat & 

cholesterol 

and 

moderate 

in total fat 

Choose 

beverage

and food

to 

moderat

your 

intake o

sugars 

Oklahoma University of 

OklahomaDepartment of Nutrition Sciences in the College of Allied Health 

X X -- -- 

Oregon Oregon State 

University, Extension Family and Community Development 

-- X X X 

Pennsylvania Pennsylvania 

Nutrition Education Program 

-- -- -- X 

Rhode Island University of 

Rhode Island 

X X X X X X X 

South Carolina 

Clemson University 

X X X X X 

South Carolina 

South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Office of Public Health Nutrition 

X X X X X 

South Dakota South Dakota 

State University Cooperative Extension Service 

X X X 

Tennessee Tennessee State 

University, Nutrition Education Program (NEP) 

X X X X 
37

State Implementing 

Agency 

Aim for 

a 

healthy 

weight 

Be 

physically 

active 

each day 

Let the 

pyramid 

guide 

your food 

choices 

Choose 

a variety 

of grains 

daily 

Choose a 

variety of 

fruits and 

vegetables 

daily 

Keep 

food 

safe to 

eat 

Choose a 

diet low in 

saturated 

fat & 

cholesterol 

and 

moderate 

in total fat 

Choose 

beverage

and food

to 

moderat

your 

intake o

sugars 

Tennessee University of 

Tennessee, Agricultural Extension Service Tennessee Nutrition & Consumer Education Program (TNCEP) 

X X X X X X 

Texas Corpus Christi 

Food Bank 

X X X X X X X X 

Texas Houston Food 

Bank 

X X X X X X X X 

Texas San Antonio Food 

Bank 

-- -- X -- X X -- 

Texas South Plains Food 

Bank 

X X X X 

Texas Tarrant Area Food 

Bank 

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 

Texas Texas A&M 

Cooperative Extension 

X X 

Utah Utah State 

University 

X X X 

Vermont Bennington 

Rutland Opportunity Council (BROC) 

-- X X X X X X 

Vermont Central Vermont 

Community Action Council (CVCAC) 

-- X X X X X X X 
38

State Implementing 

Agency 

Aim for 

a 

healthy 

weight 

Be 

physically 

active 

each day 

Let the 

pyramid 

guide 

your food 

choices 

Choose 

a variety 

of grains 

daily 

Choose a 

variety of 

fruits and 

vegetables 

daily 

Keep 

food 

safe to 

eat 

Choose a 

diet low in 

saturated 

fat & 

cholesterol 

and 

moderate 

in total fat 

Choose 

beverage

and food

to 

moderat

your 

intake o

sugars 

Vermont Champlain Valley 

Office of Economic Opportunity (CVOEO) 

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 

Vermont University of 

Vermont 

X X X X 

Vermont Vermont 

Campaign to End Childhood Hunger 

X X X X X 

Virginia Virginia 

Polytechnic Institute and State University 

X X X X 

Washington Department of 

Social and Health Services, Aging and Disability Services Administration 

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 

Washington Washington State 

Department of Health 

X X X 

Washington Washington State 

University 

X X X X X 

West Virginia West Virginia 

University 

-- 

Wisconsin Great Lakes InterTribal Council X X Wisconsin Ho-Chunk Nation X X X X X 
39

State Implementing 

Agency 

Aim for 

a 

healthy 

weight 

Be 

physically 

active 

each day 

Let the 

pyramid 

guide 

your food 

choices 

Choose 

a variety 

of grains 

daily 

Choose a 

variety of 

fruits and 

vegetables 

daily 

Keep 

food 

safe to 

eat 

Choose a 

diet low in 

saturated 

fat & 

cholesterol 

and 

moderate 

in total fat 

Choose 

beverage

and food

to 

moderat

your 

intake o

sugars 

Wisconsin University of 

WisconsinExtension 

X X X 

Wyoming University of 

Wyoming 

X X X X X 

TOTAL 21 27 61 30 73 45 30 23 

*--- missing information Source: Implementing Agency Survey 
40

Figure 11. Types of Indirect Education by Implementing Agency 

State Implementing Agency Mass Communications Print Materials Public Events 

Alaska University of Alaska 

Fairbanks, Cooperative Extension Service 

X X 

Arizona Arizona Department of Health 

Services 

X X X 

Arkansas Family and Consumer 

Sciences, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Arkansas 

X X 

Arkansas University of Arkansas at Pine 

Bluff 

X X 

California California Department of 

Health Services/California Nutrition Network 

X X X 

California University of California, Davis X X X Colorado Colorado State University X X Connecticut CT Department of Public 

Health 

X X X 

Connecticut University of Connecticut, 

Family Nutrition Program 

X X X 

DC DC Department of Health X X X Delaware University of Delaware -- -- -- Florida University of Florida X X X Georgia University of Georgia, Older 

Adults 

X 

Georgia University of Georgia 

Cooperative Extension Service 

X X X 

Hawaii University of Hawaii, 

Cooperative Extension Service 

X X 

Idaho University of Idaho Extension 

Nutrition Program 

X X X 

Illinois University of Illinois 

Extension at UrbanaChampaign 

X X 

Illinois University of Illinois at 

Chicago, Division of Community Health 

-- -- -- 
41

State Implementing Agency Mass Communications Print Materials Public Events 

Indiana Purdue University Cooperative 

Extension Service 

X X 

Iowa Iowa Nutrition Network; Iowa 

Department of Public Health 

X X X 

Iowa Iowa State University 

Extension 

X X 

Kansas Kansas State University/State 

Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services 

X X X 

Kentucky University of Kentucky X X Louisiana Louisiana State University X X X Maine Maine Nutrition Network X X X Maine University of Maine 

Cooperative Extension 

X X 

Maryland Maryland Cooperative 

Extension 

X X 

Massachusetts University of Massachusetts X X Michigan Michigan State University 

Extension 

X X X 

Minnesota Minnesota Chippewa Tribe X X Minnesota University of Minnesota 

College of Human Ecology 

X X X 

Mississippi Alcorn State University X X X Mississippi Mississippi State University X X X Missouri Missouri Department of Health 

and Senior Services, Bureau of Nutrition Policy and Education 

X X X 

Missouri University of MissouriColumbia X X Montana Montana State University X X Nebraska University of Nebraska X X X Nevada Department of Nutrition, 

University of Nevada, Reno 

X 

Nevada University of Nevada 

Cooperative Extension 

X X 

New Hampshire UNH Cooperative Extension X X X 
42

State Implementing Agency Mass Communications Print Materials Public Events 

New Jersey Rutgers, The State University 

of New Jersey 

-- -- -- 

New Mexico New Mexico State University, 

Cooperative Extension Service 

X X X 

New York Cornell Cooperative Extension -- -- -- New York NY Department of Health X X North Carolina Forsyth County Health 

Department 

X X 

North Carolina Macon County Public Health 

Center 

X X 

North Carolina North Carolina A&T State 

University 

-- -- -- 

North Carolina North Carolina Cooperative 

Extension - NC Nutrition Network 

-- -- -- 

North Carolina North Carolina Cooperative 

Extension - Partners In Wellness 

-- -- -- 

North Carolina North Carolina Division of 

Aging 

-- -- -- 

North Dakota North Dakota State University 

Extension Service 

X X 

Ohio Ohio State University 

Extension 

X 

Oklahoma Chickasaw Nation X X X Oklahoma Oklahoma State University 

Cooperative Extension Service 

X X X 

Oklahoma University of OklahomaDepartment of Nutrition 

Sciences in the College of Allied Health 

X 

Oregon Oregon State University, 

Extension Family and Community Development 

X X X 

Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Nutrition 

Education Program 

X X 

Rhode Island University of Rhode Island X X X South Carolina Clemson University -- -- -- 
43

State Implementing Agency Mass Communications Print Materials Public Events 

South Carolina South Carolina Department of 

Health and Environmental Control, Office of Public Health Nutrition 

X X 

South Dakota South Dakota State University 

Cooperative Extension Service 

-- -- -- 

Tennessee Tennessee State University, 

Nutrition Education Program (NEP) 

X X X 

Tennessee University of Tennessee, 

Agricultural Extension Service Tennessee Nutrition & Consumer Education Program (TNCEP) 

X X X 

Texas Corpus Christi Food Bank X X X Texas Houston Food Bank X X Texas San Antonio Food Bank X X X Texas South Plains Food Bank X X Texas Tarrant Area Food Bank Texas Texas A&M Cooperative 

Extension 

X X X 

Utah Utah State University -- -- -- Vermont Bennington Rutland 

Opportunity Council (BROC) 

-- -- -- 

Vermont Central Vermont Community 

Action Council (CVCAC) 

-- -- -- 

Vermont Champlain Valley Office of 

Economic Opportunity (CVOEO) 

Vermont University of Vermont X X Vermont Vermont Campaign to End 

Childhood Hunger 

-- -- -- 

Virginia Virginia Polytechnic Institute 

and State University 

-- -- -- 

Washington Department of Social and 

Health Services, Aging and Disability Services Administration 

-- -- -- 
44

State Implementing Agency Mass Communications Print Materials Public Events 

Washington Washington State Department 

of Health 

X X 

Washington Washington State University -- -- -- West Virginia West Virginia University X X Wisconsin Great Lakes Inter-Tribal 

Council 

X X X 

Wisconsin Ho-Chunk Nation X X Wisconsin University of WisconsinExtension X X Wyoming University of Wyoming X X X 

TOTAL 37 64 57 

*--- missing information Source: Implementing Agency Survey 
45

Figure 12. Coordination of FSNE with other FNS programs/initiatives by Implementing Agency* 

State Implementing 

Agency 

WIC National 

School 

Lunch 

Program 

School Breakfast 

Program 

Team 

Nutrition 

Summer 

Food 

Service 

Program 

Child an

Adult Ca

Food 

Program 

Alaska University of 

Alaska Fairbanks, Cooperative Extension Service 

X X 

Arizona Arizona 

Department of Health Services 

X X 

Arkansas Family and 

Consumer Sciences, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Arkansas 

X X 

Arkansas University of 

Arkansas at Pine Bluff 

X X X 

California California 

Department of Health Services/California Nutrition Network 

X X X 

California University of 

California, Davis 

X X X X X 

Colorado Colorado State 

University 

X X X 

Connecticut CT Department of 

Public Health 

X 

Connecticut University of 

Connecticut, Family Nutrition Program 

X X X X X 

DC DC Department of 

Health 

Delaware University of 

Delaware 

Florida University of 

Florida 

X 
46

State Implementing 

Agency 

WIC National 

School 

Lunch 

Program 

School Breakfast 

Program 

Team 

Nutrition 

Summer 

Food 

Service 

Program 

Child an

Adult Ca

Food 

Program 

Georgia University of 

Georgia, Older Adults 

Georgia University of 

Georgia Cooperative Extension Service 

Hawaii University of 

Hawaii, Cooperative Extension Service 

X 

Idaho University of 

Idaho Extension Nutrition Program 

X -- -- X 

Illinois University of 

Illinois Extension at UrbanaChampaign 

X X X X X 

Illinois University of 

Illinois at Chicago, Division of Community Health 

X X X X 

Indiana Purdue University 

Cooperative Extension Service 

X X 

Iowa Iowa Nutrition 

Network; Iowa Department of Public Health 

X X 

Iowa Iowa State 

University Extension 

Kansas Kansas State 

University/State Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services 

X X X X 
47

State Implementing 

Agency 

WIC National 

School 

Lunch 

Program 

School Breakfast 

Program 

Team 

Nutrition 

Summer 

Food 

Service 

Program 

Child an

Adult Ca

Food 

Program 

Kentucky University of 

Kentucky 

X X X 

Louisiana Louisiana State 

University 

X X X X X 

Maine Maine Nutrition 

Network 

X X X X X 

Maine University of 

Maine Cooperative Extension 

X X 

Maryland Maryland 

Cooperative Extension 

Massachusetts University of 

Massachusetts 

X X X X X 

Michigan Michigan State 

University Extension 

X X X 

Minnesota Minnesota 

Chippewa Tribe 

X X X 

Minnesota University of 

Minnesota College of Human Ecology 

-- -- -- 

Mississippi Alcorn State 

University 

X X X X X 

Mississippi Mississippi State 

University 

X X X -- X -- 

Missouri Missouri 

Department of Health and Senior Services, Bureau of Nutrition Policy and Education 

X X X X 

Missouri University of 

MissouriColumbia 

X X X 

Montana Montana State 

University 

X X 

Nebraska University of 

Nebraska 

X 
48

State Implementing 

Agency 

WIC National 

School 

Lunch 

Program 

School Breakfast 

Program 

Team 

Nutrition 

Summer 

Food 

Service 

Program 

Child an

Adult Ca

Food 

Program 

Nevada Department of 

Nutrition, University of Nevada, Reno 

X X X 

Nevada University of 

Nevada Cooperative Extension 

X 

New Hampshire 

UNH Cooperative Extension 

X X X X X X 

New Jersey Rutgers, The State 

University of New Jersey 

New Mexico New Mexico State 

University, Cooperative Extension Service 

X X X X 

New York Cornell 

Cooperative Extension 

New York NY Department of 

Health 

North Carolina 

Forsyth County Health Department 

-- -- -- -- -- -- 

North Carolina 

Macon County Public Health Center 

-- X X -- -- X 

North Carolina 

North Carolina A&T State University 

X X X 

North Carolina 

North Carolina Cooperative Extension - NC Nutrition Network 

North Carolina 

North Carolina Cooperative Extension - Partners In Wellness 
49

State Implementing 

Agency 

WIC National 

School 

Lunch 

Program 

School Breakfast 

Program 

Team 

Nutrition 

Summer 

Food 

Service 

Program 

Child an

Adult Ca

Food 

Program 

North Carolina 

North Carolina Division of Aging 

-- -- -- -- -- -- 

North Dakota North Dakota State 

University Extension Service 

Ohio Ohio State 

University Extension 

X 

Oklahoma Chickasaw Nation X Oklahoma Oklahoma State 

University Cooperative Extension Service 

X X 

Oklahoma University of 

OklahomaDepartment of Nutrition Sciences in the College of Allied Health 

Oregon Oregon State 

University, Extension Family and Community Development 

Pennsylvania Pennsylvania 

Nutrition Education Program 

X -- 

Rhode Island University of 

Rhode Island 

South Carolina 

Clemson University 

South Carolina 

South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Office of Public Health Nutrition 

X 
50

State Implementing 

Agency 

WIC National 

School 

Lunch 

Program 

School Breakfast 

Program 

Team 

Nutrition 

Summer 

Food 

Service 

Program 

Child an

Adult Ca

Food 

Program 

South Dakota South Dakota State 

University Cooperative Extension Service 

X X X 

Tennessee Tennessee State 

University, Nutrition Education Program (NEP) 

X -- -- -- -- -- 

Tennessee University of 

Tennessee, Agricultural Extension Service Tennessee Nutrition & Consumer Education Program (TNCEP) 

X X X X 

Texas Corpus Christi 

Food Bank 

-- -- -- -- -- -- 

Texas Houston Food 

Bank 

X 

Texas San Antonio Food 

Bank 

Texas South Plains Food 

Bank 

Texas Tarrant Area Food 

Bank 

-- -- -- -- -- -- 

Texas Texas A&M 

Cooperative Extension 

Utah Utah State 

University 

X -- -- -- -- -- 

Vermont Bennington 

Rutland Opportunity Council (BROC) 

X X 
51

State Implementing 

Agency 

WIC National 

School 

Lunch 

Program 

School Breakfast 

Program 

Team 

Nutrition 

Summer 

Food 

Service 

Program 

Child an

Adult Ca

Food 

Program 

Vermont Central Vermont 

Community Action Council (CVCAC) 

X 

Vermont Champlain Valley 

Office of Economic Opportunity (CVOEO) 

X X 

Vermont University of 

Vermont 

X 

Vermont Vermont 

Campaign to End Childhood Hunger 

X 

Virginia Virginia 

Polytechnic Institute and State University 

X X X -- 

Washington Department of 

Social and Health Services, Aging and Disability Services Administration 

-- -- -- -- -- -- 

Washington Washington State 

Department of Health 

X X 

Washington Washington State 

University 

X X X 

West Virginia West Virginia 

University 

X X 

Wisconsin Great Lakes InterTribal Council X X Wisconsin Ho-Chunk Nation X Wisconsin University of 

WisconsinExtension 

X 

Wyoming University of 

Wyoming 

X X 
52

State Implementing 

Agency 

WIC National 

School 

Lunch 

Program 

School Breakfast 

Program 

Team 

Nutrition 

Summer 

Food 

Service 

Program 

Child an

Adult Ca

Food 

Program 

TOTAL 48 25 15 21 28 14 

*’Moderate’ or ‘Well’ Coordinated *--- missing information Source: Implementing Agency Survey 
53

Figure 13. Formal Partners by Implementing Agency 

State Implementing 

Agency 

State 

Cooperative 

Extension 

Service 

Other 

university/ 

academic 

center 

State or 

local 

health 

department 

State WIC 

Agency 

Agency on 

aging 

TANF or 

welfare 

agency 

State 

Department 

of 

Education 

Local 

school 

district 

Emergency

food 

provider 

Fo

indu

Alaska University of 

Alaska Fairbanks, Cooperative Extension Service 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Arizona Arizona 

Department of Health Services 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Arkansas Family and 

Consumer Sciences, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Arkansas 

X X X X X X 

Arkansas University of 

Arkansas at Pine Bluff 

X X 

California California 

Department of Health Services/California Nutrition Network

X X X X X X 

California University of 

California, Davis 

X X X X X 

Colorado Colorado State 

University 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Connecticut CT Department 

of Public Health 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Connecticut University of 

Connecticut, Family Nutrition Program 

X 

DC DC Department 

of Health 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 
54

State Implementing 

Agency 

State 

Cooperative 

Extension 

Service 

Other 

university/ 

academic 

center 

State or 

local 

health 

department 

State WIC 

Agency 

Agency on 

aging 

TANF or 

welfare 

agency 

State 

Department 

of 

Education 

Local 

school 

district 

Emergency

food 

provider 

Fo

indu

Delaware University of 

Delaware 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Florida University of 

Florida 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Georgia University of 

Georgia, Older Adults 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Georgia University of 

Georgia Cooperative Extension Service 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Hawaii University of 

Hawaii, Cooperative Extension Service 

X X X X 

Idaho University of 

Idaho Extension Nutrition Program 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Illinois University of 

Illinois Extension at UrbanaChampaign 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Illinois University of 

Illinois at Chicago, Division of Community Health 

X X X X 

Indiana Purdue University 

Cooperative Extension Service 

X 

Iowa Iowa Nutrition 

Network; Iowa Department of Public Health 

X X 

Iowa Iowa State 

University Extension 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 
55

State Implementing 

Agency 

State 

Cooperative 

Extension 

Service 

Other 

university/ 

academic 

center 

State or 

local 

health 

department 

State WIC 

Agency 

Agency on 

aging 

TANF or 

welfare 

agency 

State 

Department 

of 

Education 

Local 

school 

district 

Emergency

food 

provider 

Fo

indu

Kansas Kansas State 

University/State Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Kentucky University of 

Kentucky 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Louisiana Louisiana State 

University 

X X X X X 

Maine Maine Nutrition 

Network

X X X 

Maine University of 

Maine Cooperative Extension 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Maryland Maryland 

Cooperative Extension 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Massachusetts University of 

Massachusetts 

X X 

Michigan Michigan State 

University Extension 

X X X X X 

Minnesota Minnesota 

Chippewa Tribe 

X X X X 

Minnesota University of 

Minnesota College of Human Ecology 

X X X 

Mississippi Alcorn State 

University 

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -

Mississippi Mississippi State 

University 

X X 
56

State Implementing 

Agency 

State 

Cooperative 

Extension 

Service 

Other 

university/ 

academic 

center 

State or 

local 

health 

department 

State WIC 

Agency 

Agency on 

aging 

TANF or 

welfare 

agency 

State 

Department 

of 

Education 

Local 

school 

district 

Emergency

food 

provider 

Fo

indu

Missouri Missouri 

Department of Health and Senior Services, Bureau of Nutrition Policy and Education 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Missouri University of 

MissouriColumbia 

X X X X X 

Montana Montana State 

University 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Nebraska University of 

Nebraska 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Nevada Department of 

Nutrition, University of Nevada, Reno 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Nevada University of 

Nevada Cooperative Extension 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

New Hampshire 

UNH Cooperative Extension 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

New Jersey Rutgers, The 

State University of New Jersey 

X X X 

New Mexico New Mexico 

State University, Cooperative Extension Service 

X X X X 

New York Cornell 

Cooperative Extension 

X 

New York NY Department 

of Health 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 
57

State Implementing 

Agency 

State 

Cooperative 

Extension 

Service 

Other 

university/ 

academic 

center 

State or 

local 

health 

department 

State WIC 

Agency 

Agency on 

aging 

TANF or 

welfare 

agency 

State 

Department 

of 

Education 

Local 

school 

district 

Emergency

food 

provider 

Fo

indu

North Carolina Forsyth County 

Health Department 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

North Carolina Macon County 

Public Health Center 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

North Carolina North Carolina 

A&T State University 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

North Carolina North Carolina 

Cooperative Extension - NC Nutrition Network

North Carolina North Carolina 

Cooperative Extension - Partners In Wellness 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

North Carolina North Carolina 

Division of Aging 

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -

North Dakota North Dakota 

State University Extension Service 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Ohio Ohio State 

University Extension 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Oklahoma Chickasaw 

Nation 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Oklahoma Oklahoma State 

University Cooperative Extension Service 

Oklahoma University of ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 
58

State Implementing 

Agency 

State 

Cooperative 

Extension 

Service 

Other 

university/ 

academic 

center 

State or 

local 

health 

department 

State WIC 

Agency 

Agency on 

aging 

TANF or 

welfare 

agency 

State 

Department 

of 

Education 

Local 

school 

district 

Emergency

food 

provider 

Fo

indu

OklahomaDepartment of Nutrition Sciences in the College of Allied Health 

Oregon Oregon State 

University, Extension Family and Community Development 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Pennsylvania Pennsylvania 

Nutrition Education Program 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Rhode Island University of 

Rhode Island 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

South Carolina Clemson 

University 

South Carolina South Carolina 

Department of Health and Environmental Control, Office of Public Health Nutrition 

X X X X X 

South Dakota South Dakota 

State University Cooperative Extension Service 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Tennessee Tennessee State 

University, Nutrition Education Program (NEP) 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Tennessee University of ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 
59

State Implementing 

Agency 

State 

Cooperative 

Extension 

Service 

Other 

university/ 

academic 

center 

State or 

local 

health 

department 

State WIC 

Agency 

Agency on 

aging 

TANF or 

welfare 

agency 

State 

Department 

of 

Education 

Local 

school 

district 

Emergency

food 

provider 

Fo

indu

Tennessee, Agricultural Extension Service Tennessee Nutrition & Consumer Education Program (TNCEP) 

Texas Corpus Christi 

Food Bank 

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -

Texas Houston Food 

Bank 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Texas San Antonio 

Food Bank 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Texas South Plains 

Food Bank 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Texas Tarrant Area 

Food Bank 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Texas Texas A&M 

Cooperative Extension 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Utah Utah State 

University 

X X X X X X X 

Vermont Bennington 

Rutland Opportunity Council (BROC) 

Vermont Central Vermont 

Community Action Council (CVCAC) 

X X 

Vermont Champlain Valley 

Office of Economic Opportunity (CVOEO) 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 
60

State Implementing 

Agency 

State 

Cooperative 

Extension 

Service 

Other 

university/ 

academic 

center 

State or 

local 

health 

department 

State WIC 

Agency 

Agency on 

aging 

TANF or 

welfare 

agency 

State 

Department 

of 

Education 

Local 

school 

district 

Emergency

food 

provider 

Fo

indu

Vermont University of 

Vermont 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Vermont Vermont 

Campaign to End Childhood Hunger 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Virginia Virginia 

Polytechnic Institute and State University 

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

Washington Department of 

Social and Health Services, Aging and Disability Services Administration 

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -

Washington Washington State 

Department of Health 

X 

Washington Washington State 

University 

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -

West Virginia West Virginia 

University 

X X 

Wisconsin Great Lakes 

Inter-Tribal Council 

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -

Wisconsin Ho-Chunk Nation ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Wisconsin University of 

WisconsinExtension 

X 

Wyoming University of 

Wyoming 

X X X X X 

 Total 10 12 11 18 5 3 14 11 7 0 

* ~ legitimate skip; --- missing information Source: Implementing Agency Survey 
 61 

III. State Profiles 
 62 

Alabama 

FNS Region Southeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $6,324,790 

Total FSNE Outlays $10,040,879 

 Federal $5,020,439 

 Non-federal $5,020,440 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $20 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $7 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 33% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE No local food stamp offices wereinvolved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement -* 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies - 

The Alabama implementing agencies did not participate in this review. 

*Missing Data
 63 

Alaska 

FNS Region Western 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $119,990 

Total FSNE Outlays $122,344 

 Federal $61,172 

 Non-federal $61,172 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $2 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $1 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 0% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 0% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Only a few local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 8% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

Alaska-University of Alaska Fairbanks, Cooperative Extension Service 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 6 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $277,380 

Total Outlays $277,380 

 Federal $138,690 

 Non-Federal $138,690 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 55% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 100% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 5 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 20 

o Adults (18-59 years) 60 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 15 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 70 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 10 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 15 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 5 

 
 64 

Alaska-University of Alaska Fairbanks, Cooperative Extension Service 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Whole grains, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Most 

Materials in Other Languages None 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 7 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Single Session 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Single Session 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Not Used 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Single Session 

o WIC clinics: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Few services 
 65 

Arizona 

FNS Region Western 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $6,814,293 

Total FSNE Outlays $9,700,007 

 Federal $4,850,003 

 Non-federal $4,850,004 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $18 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $5 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 50% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE All local food stamp offices were involved in some manner 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 25% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

Arizona-Arizona Department of Health Services 

Type of Organization A division of a State or territorial health department 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 32 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations 51 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 2 

 

IA FSNE Budget $13,628,586 

Total Outlays $10,620,491 

 Federal $4,633,612 

 Non-Federal $5,986,879 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 100% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 80% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 20 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 66 

o Adults (18-59 years) 12 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 2 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 50 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 25 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 25 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 66 

Arizona-Arizona Department of Health Services 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Physically active, Fruits and vegetables, Low fat 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Most 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA A Few 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 7 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Single Session 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Single Session 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 4 

 Any Statewide Yes 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 6 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested All messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Some services 
 67 

Arkansas 

FNS Region Southwest 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $2,583,372 

Total FSNE Outlays $2,592,199 

 Federal $1,296,099 

 Non-federal $1,296,100 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $7 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $3 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 80% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 17% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE 

 Many, but not all, local foodstamp offices were involved in 

FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 42% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

Arkansas-Family and Consumer Sciences,Cooperative Extension Service, University of Arkansas 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 48 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 7 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $2,290,448 

Total Outlays $2,162,308 

 Federal $1,081,154 

 Non-Federal $1,081,154 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 64% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 99% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 1 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 93 

o Adults (18-59 years) 6 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 5 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 95 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 68 

Arkansas-Family and Consumer Sciences,Cooperative Extension Service, University of Arkansas 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Physically active, Pyramid, Whole grains, Fruits and vegetables, 

Low fat, Moderate sugar intake 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Most 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 7 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-Group Single Session 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Single Session 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Not Used 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Single Session 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Single Session 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested No messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Some services 
 69 

Arkansas 

FNS Region Southwest 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $2,583,372 

Total FSNE Outlays $2,592,199 

 Federal $1,296,099 

 Non-federal $1,296,100 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $7 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $3 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 80% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 17% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE 

 Many, but not all, local foodstamp offices were involved in 

FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 42% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

Arkansas-University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 1 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations 147 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 2 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $626,032 

Total Outlays $508,524 

 Federal $214,945 

 Non-Federal $293,579 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 11% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 100% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training All required 

 

Target Audience FSP recipients and applicants only 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 3 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 42 

o Adults (18-59 years) 48 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 7 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 80 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 10 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 9 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 1 
 70 

Arkansas-University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Healthy weight, Pyramid, Whole grains, Fruits and vegetables, 

Safe foods, Low fat, Moderate sugar intake, Less salt 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Some 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 9 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Health care sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Other: None Listed 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 4 

 Any Statewide No 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 3 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Some services 
 71 

California 

FNS Region Western 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $86,689,306 

Total FSNE Outlays $65,083,924 

 Federal $32,541,962 

 Non-federal $32,541,962 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $35 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $6 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 17% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 17% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

California-California Department of Health Services/California Nutrition Network 

Type of Organization A division of a State or territorial health department 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 204 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations 410 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 7 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $176,165,116 

Total Outlays $55,267,676 

 Federal $27,633,838 

 Non-Federal $27,633,838 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 100% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 0% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training Don't know, policy varies 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 40 

o Adults (18-59 years) 60 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 40 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 72 

California-California Department of Health Services/California Nutrition Network 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Physically active, Fruits and vegetables 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Most 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages 

 Arabic, Cambodian, Chinese, Hindi, Hmong, Korean, Portugese, 

Russian, Spanish,Vietnamese,Thai 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 12 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Single Session 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Health care sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Used-Group Single Session 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

 Farmers' Markets Health Fairs, Flea Markets, Public relations 

venues, Community college sites, Park &Recreation sites, Safe 

Route 2 Schools, PTAs, Promatoras Community Centers-Group 

Single Session 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 4 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 1 

 Any Statewide Yes 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 7 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 73 

California 

FNS Region Western 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $86,689,306 

Total FSNE Outlays $65,083,924 

 Federal $32,541,962 

 Non-federal $32,541,962 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $35 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $6 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 17% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 17% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

California-University of California, Davis 

Type of Organization 

 A department or college, other than public health, within a 

university 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 39 

Number of Subcontractors 19 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 5 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 3 

 

IA FSNE Budget $10,974,120 

Total Outlays $10,414,805 

 Federal $4,908,124 

 Non-Federal $5,506,681 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 75% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 70% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training All required 

 

Target Audience FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 5 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 65 

o Adults (18-59 years) 30 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 85 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 15 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 74 

California-University of California, Davis 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Healthy weight, Pyramid, Whole grains, Fruits and vegetables, 

Safe foods, Low fat, Moderate sugar intake 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Most 

Materials in Other Languages Cambodian, Chinese, Hmong, Spanish,Vietnamese 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 10 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-Group Single Session 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Not Used 

o Elderly services site: Not Used 

o WIC clinics: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Health care sites: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Adult education and training sites Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Used-Group Single Session 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-Group Single Session 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested All messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation All services 
 75 

Colorado 

FNS Region Mt. Plains 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $2,932,317 

Total FSNE Outlays $5,125,461 

 Federal $2,562,730 

 Non-federal $2,562,731 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $21 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $5 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 54% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 50% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE 

 Many, but not all, local foodstamp offices were involved in 

FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 50% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

Colorado-Colorado State University 

Type of Organization 

 Other Land Grant University that involves Cooperative 

Extension AND the Department of Food Science and Human 

Nutrition. A sub-subcontract goes to other UniversityUniversity of Colorado Health Sciences Center. 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 26 

Number of Subcontractors 5 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations 14 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 2 

 

IA FSNE Budget $5,135,492 

Total Outlays $5,135,492 

 Federal $2,547,112 

 Non-Federal $2,588,380 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 63% 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 100% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 22 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 58 

o Adults (18-59 years) 20 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 16 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 35 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 49 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 76 

Colorado-Colorado State University 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Pyramid, Whole grains, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Most 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA A Few 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 8 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-Other-Individual (Self-Taught) 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-Other-Individual (Self-Taught) 

o Health care sites: Used-Other-Individual (Self-Taught) 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 1 

 Any Statewide Yes 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 0 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 77 

Connecticut 

FNS Region Northeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $2,530,006 

Total FSNE Outlays $4,395,941 

 Federal $2,197,970 

 Non-federal $2,197,971 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $22 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $7 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 0% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 8% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

Connecticut-CT Department of Public Health 

Type of Organization A division of a State or territorial health department 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 3 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $1,315,942 

Total Outlays $1,276,880 

 Federal $618,909 

 Non-Federal $657,971 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 100% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 40% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, voluntary certification 

 

Target Audience 

 FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 50 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 10 

o Adults (18-59 years) 40 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 30 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 60 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 10 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 78 

Connecticut-CT Department of Public Health 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Most 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA A Few 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 5 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Single Session 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Single Session 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Not Used 

o WIC clinics: Not Used 

o Health care sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Single Session 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 1 

 Any Statewide No 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 4 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested All messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 79 

Connecticut 

FNS Region Northeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $2,530,006 

Total FSNE Outlays $4,395,941 

 Federal $2,197,970 

 Non-federal $2,197,971 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $22 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $7 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 0% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 8% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

Connecticut-University of Connecticut, Family Nutrition Program 

Type of Organization 

 A nutrition or public health school/department/college within a 

university 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 6 

Number of Subcontractors 4 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 1 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 3 

 

IA FSNE Budget $3,744,068 

Total Outlays $3,218,054 

 Federal $1,609,027 

 Non-Federal $1,609,027 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 0% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 87% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, voluntary certification 

 

Target Audience 

 FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 0 

o Adults (18-59 years) 0 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 80 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 15 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 5 
 80 

Connecticut-University of Connecticut, Family Nutrition Program 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Most 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages Cambodian, Spanish,Vietnamese 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 10 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Elderly services site: Used-Other-Individual (Self-Taught) 

o WIC clinics: Used-Other-Individual (Self-Taught) 

o Health care sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

 primary care and & WIC waiting areas-Other-Individual (SelfTaught) 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 2 

 Any Statewide No 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 4 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested All messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 81 

DC 

FNS Region Mid-Atlantic 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $500,000 

Total FSNE Outlays $450,843 

 Federal $225,422 

 Non-federal $225,421 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $5 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $3 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 33% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 25% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

DC-DC Department of Health 

Type of Organization A division of a State or territorial health department 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Memorandum of Understanding 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 2 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations 12 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $1,000,000 

Total Outlays $450,843 

 Federal $225,422 

 Non-Federal $225,421 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 100% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 100% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 1 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 60 

o Adults (18-59 years) 20 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 19 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 55 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 25 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 15 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 5 
 82 

DC-DC Department of Health 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Healthy weight, Physically active, Pyramid, Whole grains, 

Fruits and vegetables, Low fat, Moderate sugar intake, Less salt 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA A Few 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 9 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Single Session 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Single Session 

o Health care sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Single Session 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

 WIC State Agency - 6 week nutrition classes-Group Multiple 

Sessions 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 2 

 Any Statewide Yes 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 2 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Some services 
 83 

Delaware 

FNS Region - 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $ - 

Total FSNE Outlays $ - 

 Federal $ - 

 Non-federal $ - 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $ - 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $ - 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 83% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE - 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement - 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

Delaware-University of Delaware 

Type of Organization - 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $ 

Total Outlays $ 

 Federal $ 

 Non-Federal $ 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 100% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 0% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 0 

o Adults (18-59 years) 0 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 84 

Delaware-University of Delaware 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Pyramid, Whole grains, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA - 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA - 

Materials in Other Languages None 

 

Direct Education - 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education N/A 

Indirect Education - 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education - 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested No messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: No 

o Indirect Education: No 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation - 
 85 

Florida 

FNS Region Southeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $3,077,056 

Total FSNE Outlays $3,598,760 

 Federal $1,799,380 

 Non-federal $1,799,380 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $3 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $1 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 51% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 67% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 17% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

Florida-University of Florida 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 35 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $6,459,361 

Total Outlays $3,315,084 

 Federal $1,581,164 

 Non-Federal $1,733,920 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 52% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 10% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 85 

o Adults (18-59 years) 10 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 5 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 86 

Florida-University of Florida 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables, Low fat, Moderate sugar intake 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Most 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 12 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Health care sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested No messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Some services 
 87 

Georgia 

FNS Region Southeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $1,505,701 

Total FSNE Outlays $1,763,986 

 Federal $881,993 

 Non-federal $881,993 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $2 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $1 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 60% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 67% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 17% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

Georgia-University of Georgia Older Adults 

Type of Organization 

 A nutrition or public health school/department/college within a 

university 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Contract 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $485,566 

Total Outlays $438,495 

 Federal $195,712 

 Non-Federal $242,783 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 36% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 50% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 0 

o Adults (18-59 years) 0 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 100 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 20 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 60 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 10 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 10 
 88 

Georgia-University of Georgia Older Adults 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Physically active, Pyramid, Whole grains, Fruits and vegetables, 

Safe foods, Low fat, Moderate sugar intake, Less salt 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Most 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA A Few 

Materials in Other Languages None 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 1 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Not Used 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Not Used 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Not Used 

o Elderly services site: Used-Delivery Mode Unknown 

o WIC clinics: Not Used 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 1 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Some services 
 89 

Georgia 

FNS Region Southeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $1,505,701 

Total FSNE Outlays $1,763,986 

 Federal $881,993 

 Non-federal $881,993 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $2 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $1 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 60% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 67% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 17% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

Georgia-University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Contract 

Number of Local Projects 59 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $2,545,998 

Total Outlays $1,372,772 

 Federal $686,386 

 Non-Federal $686,386 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 67% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 83% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 21 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 42 

o Adults (18-59 years) 17 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 20 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 100 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 90 

Georgia-University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Healthy weight, Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods, 

Low fat 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Some 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 11 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-Group Single Session 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Health care sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested No messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Some services 
 91 

Hawaii 

FNS Region Western 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $160,000 

Total FSNE Outlays $20,468 

 Federal $10,234 

 Non-federal $10,234 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $0.21 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $0.07 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 50% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE 

 Many, but not all, local foodstamp offices were involved in 

FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 25% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

Hawaii-University of Hawaii, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, Cooperative Extension Service 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Memorandum of Understanding 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 5 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $320,000 

Total Outlays $20,468 

 Federal $10,234 

 Non-Federal $10,234 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 100% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 0% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training - 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 10 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 25 

o Adults (18-59 years) 30 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 35 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 92 

Hawaii-University of Hawaii, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, Cooperative Extension Service 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA All 

Materials in Other Languages None 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 8 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Not Used 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Not Used 

o Health care sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Single Session 

o Work sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Used-Group Single Session 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: Transitional shelters, food pantries-Group Multiple Sessions 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested No messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Some services 
 93 

Idaho 

FNS Region Western 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $779,519 

Total FSNE Outlays $1,217,354 

 Federal $608,677 

 Non-federal $608,677 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $13 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $3 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 64% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 0% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Only a few local food stampoffices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 8% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

Idaho-University of Idaho Extension Nutrition Program 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 4 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $1,559,038 

Total Outlays $1,187,030 

 Federal $593,515 

 Non-Federal $593,515 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 64% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 100% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 9 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 82 

o Adults (18-59 years) 8 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 1 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 94 

Idaho-University of Idaho Extension Nutrition Program 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Physically active, Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Most 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 7 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Single Session 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Single Session 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Single Session 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested No messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 95 

Illinois 

FNS Region Midwest 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $6,121,433 

Total FSNE Outlays $11,771,235 

 Federal $5,885,617 

 Non-federal $5,885,618 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $11 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $3 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 50% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 42% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

Illinois-University of Illinois Extension at Urbana-Champaign 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 6 

 

IA FSNE Budget $7,842,722 

Total Outlays $8,284,906 

 Federal $4,142,453 

 Non-Federal $4,142,453 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 95% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 5% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training All required 

 

Target Audience 

 FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 3 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 40 

o Adults (18-59 years) 50 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 7 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 80 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 20 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 96 

Illinois-University of Illinois Extension at Urbana-Champaign 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Pyramid, Whole grains, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods, Low 

fat 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Most 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA A Few 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 9 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-Group Single Session 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Some services 
 97 

Illinois 

FNS Region Midwest 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $6,121,433 

Total FSNE Outlays $11,771,235 

 Federal $5,885,617 

 Non-federal $5,885,618 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $11 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $3 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 50% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 42% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

Illinois-University of Illinois at Chicago, Division of Community Health 

Type of Organization 

 A department or college, other than public health, within a 

university 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Contract 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 2 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 6 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 2 

 

IA FSNE Budget $4,590,405 

Total Outlays $3,486,328 

 Federal $1,743,164 

 Non-Federal $1,743,164 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 2% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 43% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training All required 

 

Target Audience 

 FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 1 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 50 

o Adults (18-59 years) 44 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 5 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 98 

Illinois-University of Illinois at Chicago, Division of Community Health 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Healthy weight, Pyramid, Whole grains, Fruits and vegetables, 

Low fat 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Some 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 8 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Not Used 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Health care sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education No 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education N/A 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 99 

Indiana 

FNS Region Midwest 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $1,372,428 

Total FSNE Outlays $2,526,322 

 Federal $1,263,161 

 Non-federal $1,263,161 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $5 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $2 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 60% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 50% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE All local food stamp officeswere involved in some manner 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 25% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

Indiana-Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 55 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 1 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $3,531,002 

Total Outlays $2,283,673 

 Federal $1,138,752 

 Non-Federal $1,144,921 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 60% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 25% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 3 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 7 

o Adults (18-59 years) 75 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 15 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 

 
 100 

Indiana-Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Physically active, Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Most 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA - 

Materials in Other Languages None 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 8 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Not Used 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 101 

Iowa 

FNS Region Mt. Plains 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $2,244,431 

Total FSNE Outlays $3,475,623 

 Federal $1,737,812 

 Non-federal $1,737,811 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $19 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $5 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 36% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 33% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE No local food stamp offices wereinvolved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement - 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

Iowa - Iowa Nutrition Network; Iowa Department of Public Health 

Type of Organization A local public health department 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Memorandum of Understanding 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 19 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations 50 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 2 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $3,040,018 

Total Outlays $2,222,560 

 Federal $1,088,484 

 Non-Federal $1,134,076 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 27% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 90% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training - 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 5 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 58 

o Adults (18-59 years) 11 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 26 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 102 

Iowa - Iowa Nutrition Network; Iowa Department of Public Health 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Some 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Most 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 6 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-Delivery Mode Unknown 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Not Used 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Not Used 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: L refers to senior housing-Delivery Mode Unknown 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 2 

 Any Statewide No 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 5 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 103 

Iowa 

FNS Region Mt. Plains 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $2,244,431 

Total FSNE Outlays $3,475,623 

 Federal $1,737,812 

 Non-federal $1,737,811 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $19 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $5 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 36% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 0% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE No local food stamp offices wereinvolved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement - 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

Iowa-Iowa State University Extension 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 28 

Number of Subcontractors 1 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $1,449,389 

Total Outlays $1,309,100 

 Federal $651,854 

 Non-Federal $657,246 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 28% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 40% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 75 

o Adults (18-59 years) 25 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 57 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 20 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 23 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 104 

Iowa-Iowa State University Extension 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods, Moderate sugar 

intake 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Most 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages Cambodian, Hmong, Spanish,Vietnamese,Thai 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 6 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Not Used 

o Elderly services site: Not Used 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Single Session 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested No messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 105 

Kansas 

FNS Region Mt. Plains 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $3,029,305 

Total FSNE Outlays $4,738,524 

 Federal $2,369,262 

 Non-federal $2,369,262 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $28 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $7 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 81% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 0% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 50% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

Kansas-Kansas State University/StateDepartment of Social and Rehabilitation Services 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Memorandum of Understanding 

Number of Local Projects 84 

Number of Subcontractors 1 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations 17 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $6,059,798 

Total Outlays $4,975,707 

 Federal $2,369,261 

 Non-Federal $2,606,446 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 80% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 90% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 37 

o Adults (18-59 years) 45 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 18 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 106 

Kansas-Kansas State University/StateDepartment of Social and Rehabilitation Services 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Some 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 9 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Other-Individual (Self-Taught) 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Elderly services site: Not Used 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Health care sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 4 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 107 

Kentucky 

FNS Region Southeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $678,982 

Total FSNE Outlays $355,326 

 Federal $177,663 

 Non-federal $177,663 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $1 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $0.26 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 50% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Only a few local food stampoffices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 17% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

Kentucky-University of Kentucky 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 2 

 

IA FSNE Budget $284,680 

Total Outlays $145,302 

 Federal $72,651 

 Non-Federal $72,651 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 48% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 87% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, voluntary certification 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 1 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 26 

o Adults (18-59 years) 64 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 8 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 60 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 8 
 108 

Kentucky-University of Kentucky 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Healthy weight, Physically active, Pyramid, Fruits and 

vegetables 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Most 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Don't know 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 9 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-Group Single Session 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Not Used 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested No messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Few services 
 109 

Louisiana 

FNS Region Southwest 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $1,694,060 

Total FSNE Outlays $2,935,688 

 Federal $1,467,844 

 Non-federal $1,467,844 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $4 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $2 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 78% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 100% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE 

 Many, but not all, local foodstamp offices were involved in 

FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 67% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

Louisiana-Louisiana State University 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Contract 

Number of Local Projects 64 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 5 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 3 

 

IA FSNE Budget $3,500,000 

Total Outlays $2,600,000 

 Federal $1,300,000 

 Non-Federal $1,300,000 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 86% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 40% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training All required 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 15 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 40 

o Adults (18-59 years) 30 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 15 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 65 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 25 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 8 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 2 
 110 

Louisiana-Louisiana State University 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Healthy weight, Physically active, Pyramid, Whole grains, 

Fruits and vegetables 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Most 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Most 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 12 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-Group Single Session 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Single Session 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Single Session 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Single Session 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Single Session 

o WIC clinics: Used-Other-Individual (Self-Taught) 

o Health care sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Single Session 

o Work sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Used-Group Single Session 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Some services 
 111 

Maine 

FNS Region Northeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $3,776,254 

Total FSNE Outlays $6,528,674 

 Federal $3,264,337 

 Non-federal $3,264,337 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $46 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $17 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 17% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 25% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

Maine-Maine Nutrition Network, University of Southern Maine 

Type of Organization 

 A nutrition or public health school/department/college within a 

university 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Memorandum of Understanding 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 91 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations 255 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 3 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 3 

 

IA FSNE Budget $5,482,228 

Total Outlays $5,032,578 

 Federal $2,503,512 

 Non-Federal $2,529,066 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 100% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 97% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training - 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 0 

o Adults (18-59 years) 0 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 112 

Maine-Maine Nutrition Network, University of Southern Maine 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Healthy weight, Physically active, Fruits and vegetables, 

Moderate sugar intake 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Some 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages None 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 7 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: 

 Use of media outlets (TV, radio)for social marketing nutrition 

messages-Other-Individual (Self-Taught) 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 1 

 Any Statewide Yes 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 5 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment No 

Proportion of Messages Tested All messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Some services 
 113 

Maine 

FNS Region Northeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $3,776,254 

Total FSNE Outlays $6,528,674 

 Federal $3,264,337 

 Non-federal $3,264,337 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $46 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $17 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 17% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 25% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

Maine-University of Maine Cooperative Extension 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 4 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $2,071,650 

Total Outlays $2,078,350 

 Federal $1,035,265 

 Non-Federal $1,043,085 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 94% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 100% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience FSP recipients and applicants only 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 16 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 50 

o Adults (18-59 years) 16 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 18 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 54 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 18 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 28 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 114 

Maine-University of Maine Cooperative Extension 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Healthy weight, Pyramid, Whole grains, Safe foods, Low fat, 

Moderate sugar intake, Less salt 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Most 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages None 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 10 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-Group Single Session 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Other-Individual (Self-Taught) 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Not Used 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Single Session 

o WIC clinics: Not Used 

o Health care sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested No messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation No services 
 115 

Maryland 

FNS Region Mid-Atlantic 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $1,226,634 

Total FSNE Outlays $1,614,800 

 Federal $807,400 

 Non-federal $807,400 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $6 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $1 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 67% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 17% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 42% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

Maryland-Maryland Cooperative Extension 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 12 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $2,453,268 

Total Outlays $1,614,800 

 Federal $807,400 

 Non-Federal $807,400 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 58% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 100% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training - 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 15 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 40 

o Adults (18-59 years) 40 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 5 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 116 

Maryland-Maryland Cooperative Extension 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables, Low fat 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Most 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 8 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Single Session 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Single Session 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Some services 
 117 

Massachusetts 

FNS Region Northeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $2,499,099 

Total FSNE Outlays $4,076,908 

 Federal $2,038,454 

 Non-federal $2,038,454 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $12 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $3 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 86% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 67% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE No local food stamp offices wereinvolved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement - 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

Massachusetts-University of Massachusetts 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 7 

Number of Subcontractors 1 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 5 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 5 

 

IA FSNE Budget $4,494,804 

Total Outlays $3,989,796 

 Federal $1,994,898 

 Non-Federal $1,994,898 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 79% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 74% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 11 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 68 

o Adults (18-59 years) 20 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 1 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 118 

Massachusetts-University of Massachusetts 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Physically active, Fruits and vegetables 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Some 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 6 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Not Used 

o Elderly services site: Not Used 

o WIC clinics: Used-Other-Individual (Self-Taught) 

o Health care sites: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: 

 Homeless shelters, pregnant andparenting teen programs, 

Sheriff's day reporting programs-Group Multiple Sessions 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Some services 
 119 

Michigan 

FNS Region Midwest 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $7,699,763 

Total FSNE Outlays $13,217,821 

 Federal $6,416,040 

 Non-federal $6,801,781 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $14 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $5 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 0% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE 

 Many, but not all, local foodstamp offices were involved in 

FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 33% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

Michigan-Michigan State University Extension 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 8 

Number of Subcontractors 11 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations - 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 6 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 3 

 

IA FSNE Budget $15,340,537 

Total Outlays $13,217,820 

 Federal $6,416,040 

 Non-Federal $6,801,780 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 100% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 20% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training Only some required 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 5 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 47 

o Adults (18-59 years) 32 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 16 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 71 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 15 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 12 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 2 
 120 

Michigan-Michigan State University Extension 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA A Few 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish,Vietnamese 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 10 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Single Session 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Other-Individual (Self-Taught) 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Single Session 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Single Session 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: Shelters-Group Multiple Sessions 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 2 

 Any Statewide No 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 4 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Some services 
 121 

Minnesota 

FNS Region Midwest 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $6,403,634 

Total FSNE Outlays $11,311,237 

 Federal $5,333,733 

 Non-federal $5,977,504 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $46 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $12 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 92% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 0% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE 

 Many, but not all, local foodstamp offices were involved in 

FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 92% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

Minnesota-Minnesota Chippewa Tribe 

Type of Organization A Tribal Council or TribalHealth program 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Contract 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 5 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 4 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 2 

 

IA FSNE Budget $688,665 

Total Outlays $461,088 

 Federal $342,313 

 Non-Federal $118,775 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 18% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 20% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 30 

o Adults (18-59 years) 40 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 30 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 60 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 10 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 10 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 20 
 122 

Minnesota-Minnesota Chippewa Tribe 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Healthy weight, Physically active, Pyramid, Whole grains, 

Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods, Low fat, Moderate sugar 

intake 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA All 

Materials in Other Languages None 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 6 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Not Used 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-Delivery Mode Unknown 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested All messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation All services 
 123 

Minnesota 

FNS Region Midwest 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $6,403,634 

Total FSNE Outlays $11,311,237 

 Federal $5,333,733 

 Non-federal $5,977,504 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $46 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $12 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 92% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 0% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE 

 Many, but not all, local foodstamp offices were involved in 

FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 92% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

Minnesota-University of Minnesota College of Human Ecology 

Type of Organization 

 A department or college, other than public health, within a 

university 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 11 

Number of Subcontractors 3 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations 32 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 3 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $11,774,270 

Total Outlays $10,599,798 

 Federal $4,991,420 

 Non-Federal $5,608,378 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 92% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 0% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 8 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 60 

o Adults (18-59 years) 18 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 14 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 124 

Minnesota-University of Minnesota College of Human Ecology 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Healthy weight, Physically active, Whole grains, Fruits and 

vegetables, Low fat 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages Hmong, Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 9 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Other-Individual (Self-Taught) 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-Other-Individual (Self-Taught) 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 1 

 Any Statewide Yes 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 3 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment No 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Some services 
 125 

Mississippi 

FNS Region Southeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $3,289,647 

Total FSNE Outlays $5,029,411 

 Federal $2,455,702 

 Non-federal $2,573,709 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $13 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $5 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 86% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 100% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE 

 Many, but not all, local foodstamp offices were involved in 

FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 42% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

Mississippi-Alcorn State University 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Contract 

Number of Local Projects 1 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations 10 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $1,315,765 

Total Outlays $1,092,313 

 Federal $518,579 

 Non-Federal $573,734 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 17% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 5% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training All required 

 

Target Audience FSP recipients and applicants only 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 65 

o Adults (18-59 years) 20 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 15 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 90 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 5 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 5 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 126 

Mississippi-Alcorn State University 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Healthy weight, Physically active, Pyramid, Whole grains, 

Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA A Few 

Materials in Other Languages None 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 12 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Single Session 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Single Session 

o WIC clinics: Used-Other-Individual (Self-Taught) 

o Health care sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Single Session 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Used-Other-Individual (Self-Taught) 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 3 

 Any Statewide No 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 5 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 127 

Mississippi 

FNS Region Southeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $3,289,647 

Total FSNE Outlays $5,029,411 

 Federal $2,455,702 

 Non-federal $2,573,709 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $13 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $5 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 86% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 100% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE 

 Many, but not all, local foodstamp offices were involved in 

FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 42% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

Mississippi-Mississippi State University 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 2 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $5,653,220 

Total Outlays $5,653,220 

 Federal $2,826,610 

 Non-Federal $2,826,610 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 88% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 48% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 48 

o Adults (18-59 years) 50 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 2 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 80 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 5 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 15 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 128 

Mississippi-Mississippi State University 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Healthy weight, Pyramid, Whole grains, Fruits and vegetables, 

Safe foods, Low fat, Less salt 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA None 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 9 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Single Session 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested All messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 129 

Missouri 

FNS Region Mt. Plains 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $7,433,068 

Total FSNE Outlays $13,012,977 

 Federal $6,506,489 

 Non-federal $6,506,488 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $19 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $9 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 17% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Only a few local food stampoffices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 17% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

Missouri-Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, Bureau of Nutrition Policy and Education 

(Missouri Nutrition Network) 

Type of Organization A division of a State or territorial health department 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Memorandum of Understanding 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 10 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations 72 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 2 

 

IA FSNE Budget $2,724,890 

Total Outlays $2,125,937 

 Federal $845,138 

 Non-Federal $1,280,799 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 35% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 95% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training - 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 0 

o Adults (18-59 years) 0 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 

 
 130 

Missouri-Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, Bureau of Nutrition Policy and Education 

(Missouri Nutrition Network) 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Fruits and vegetables 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Don't know 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA A Few 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 6 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Single Session 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Not Used 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Not Used 

o WIC clinics: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 1 

 Any Statewide No 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 3 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested All messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 131 

Missouri 

FNS Region Mt. Plains 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $7,433,068 

Total FSNE Outlays $13,012,977 

 Federal $6,506,489 

 Non-federal $6,506,488 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $19 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $9 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 17% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Only a few local food stampoffices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 17% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

Missouri-University of Missouri-Columbia 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 9 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 5 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 2 

 

IA FSNE Budget $11,696,029 

Total Outlays $11,157,794 

 Federal $5,412,576 

 Non-Federal $5,745,218 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 100% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 84% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 4 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 89 

o Adults (18-59 years) 6 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 1 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 132 

Missouri-University of Missouri-Columbia 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Physically active, Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Some 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 8 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-Other-Individual (Self-Taught) 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Elderly services site: Not Used 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation All services 
 133 

Montana 

FNS Region Mt. Plains 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $567,037 

Total FSNE Outlays $1,105,021 

 Federal $552,510 

 Non-federal $552,511 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $14 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $3 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 54% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 50% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 25% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

Montana-Montana State University 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 18 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $1,191,736 

Total Outlays $1,221,217 

 Federal $552,511 

 Non-Federal $668,706 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 54% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 37% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 11 

o Adults (18-59 years) 45 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 44 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 38 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 50 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 12 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 134 

Montana-Montana State University 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Most 

Materials in Other Languages None 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 7 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Single Session 

o WIC clinics: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment No 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 135 

Nebraska 

FNS Region Mt. Plains 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $924,354 

Total FSNE Outlays $1,609,422 

 Federal $804,711 

 Non-federal $804,711 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $14 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $4 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 27% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 50% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE 

 Many, but not all, local foodstamp offices were involved in 

FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 33% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

Nebraska-University of Nebraska 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 2 

Number of Subcontractors 1 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $1,808,736 

Total Outlays $1,762,637 

 Federal $835,086 

 Non-Federal $927,551 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 32% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 100% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training - 

 

Target Audience 

 FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 10 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 20 

o Adults (18-59 years) 50 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 20 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 52 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 35 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 13 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 136 

Nebraska-University of Nebraska 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Physically active, Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods, 

Moderate sugar intake 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Some 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages Arabic, Spanish,Vietnamese 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 10 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-One-on-One with Multiple Sessions 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 137 

Nevada 

FNS Region Western 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $526,664 

Total FSNE Outlays $645,139 

 Federal $322,570 

 Non-federal $322,569 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $5 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $1 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 12% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 0% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE No local food stamp offices wereinvolved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement - 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

Nevada-Department of Nutrition, University of Nevada, Reno 

Type of Organization 

 A nutrition or public health school/department/college within a 

university 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 2 

Number of Subcontractors 2 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $322,334 

Total Outlays $186,979 

 Federal $93,489 

 Non-Federal $93,489 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 94% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 80% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training - 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 70 

o Adults (18-59 years) 30 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 25 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 25 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 50 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 138 

Nevada-Department of Nutrition, University of Nevada, Reno 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Physically active, Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Most 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 2 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Not Used 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Not Used 

o Elderly services site: Not Used 

o WIC clinics: Not Used 

o Health care sites: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 1 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Some services 
 139 

Nevada 

FNS Region Western 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $526,664 

Total FSNE Outlays $645,139 

 Federal $322,570 

 Non-federal $322,569 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $5 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $1 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 12% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 0% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE No local food stamp offices wereinvolved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement - 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

Nevada-University of Nevada Cooperative Extension 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 1 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations 4 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $785,491 

Total Outlays $458,160 

 Federal $229,080 

 Non-Federal $229,080 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 18% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 100% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 5 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 80 

o Adults (18-59 years) 15 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 60 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 25 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 10 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 5 
 140 

Nevada-University of Nevada Cooperative Extension 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Pyramid 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Most 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA A Few 

Materials in Other Languages 

 Chinese, 

Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 3 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Not Used 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Not Used 

o Elderly services site: Not Used 

o WIC clinics: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 1 

 Any Statewide No 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 2 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation All services 
 141 

New Hampshire 

FNS Region Northeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $780,976 

Total FSNE Outlays $1,540,888 

 Federal $770,444 

 Non-federal $770,444 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $32 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $7 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 83% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE 

 Many, but not all, local foodstamp offices were involved in 

FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 25% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

New Hampshire-UNH Cooperative Extension 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Contract 

Number of Local Projects 10 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 2 

 

IA FSNE Budget $1,561,952 

Total Outlays $1,551,316 

 Federal $775,658 

 Non-Federal $775,658 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 100% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 86% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training All required 

 

Target Audience 

 FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 2 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 45 

o Adults (18-59 years) 45 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 8 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 75 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 20 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 4 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 1 
 142 

New Hampshire-UNH Cooperative Extension 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Pyramid, Whole grains, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods, Low 

fat, Moderate sugar intake, Less salt 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Some 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 11 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-Group Single Session 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Single Session 

o Health care sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 4 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 1 

 Any Statewide Yes 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 2 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 143 

New Jersey 

FNS Region Mid-Atlantic 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $2,624,445 

Total FSNE Outlays $4,572,528 

 Federal $2,286,264 

 Non-federal $2,286,264 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $12 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $3 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 52% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 0% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE No local food stamp offices wereinvolved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement - 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

New Jersey-Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 11 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations 41 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 3 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $5,248,893 

Total Outlays $5,001,601 

 Federal $2,283,964 

 Non-Federal $2,717,637 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 52% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 40% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training All required 

 

Target Audience Other 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 86 

o Adults (18-59 years) 14 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 65 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 35 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 144 

New Jersey-Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods, Low fat 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Most 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 9 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Single Session 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Used-Group Single Session 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: Camps-Group Multiple Sessions 

Indirect Education No 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education N/A 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested All messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: No 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation All services 
 145 

New Mexico 

FNS Region Southwest 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $2,003,855 

Total FSNE Outlays $3,224,109 

 Federal $1,612,055 

 Non-federal $1,612,054 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $14 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $4 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 67% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE All local food stamp officeswere involved in some manner 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 42% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

New Mexico-New Mexico State University, Cooperative Extension Service 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 31 

Number of Subcontractors 4 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 4 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 5 

 

IA FSNE Budget $4,114,896 

Total Outlays $3,254,314 

 Federal $1,611,958 

 Non-Federal $1,642,356 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 100% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 40% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 0 

o Adults (18-59 years) 0 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 35 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 30 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 20 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 15 
 146 

New Mexico-New Mexico State University, Cooperative Extension Service 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods, Low fat, Moderate 

sugar intake 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Don't know 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 11 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-Group Single Session 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Health care sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested No messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 147 

New York 

FNS Region Northeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $10,076,520 

Total FSNE Outlays $15,839,136 

 Federal $7,919,568 

 Non-federal $7,919,568 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $10 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $3 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 91% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 100% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE 

 Many, but not all, local foodstamp offices were involved in 

FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 67% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

New York-Cornell Cooperative Extension 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Contract 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 1 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $ 

Total Outlays $ 

 Federal $ 

 Non-Federal $ 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 0% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 0% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training - 

 

Target Audience - 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 8 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 43 

o Adults (18-59 years) 34 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 15 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 148 

New York-Cornell Cooperative Extension 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA - 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA - 

Materials in Other Languages - 

 

Direct Education No 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education N/A 

Indirect Education - 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education - 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment No 

Proportion of Messages Tested - 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: No 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation No services 
 149 

New York 

FNS Region Northeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $10,076,520 

Total FSNE Outlays $15,839,136 

 Federal $7,919,568 

 Non-federal $7,919,568 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $10 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $3 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 91% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 100% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE 

 Many, but not all, local foodstamp offices were involved in 

FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 67% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

New York-NY Department of Health 

Type of Organization A division of a State or territorial health department 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Memorandum of Understanding 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 1 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $1,102,141 

Total Outlays $1,102,141 

 Federal $540,942 

 Non-Federal $561,199 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 100% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 100% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training - 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 5 

o Adults (18-59 years) 72 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 23 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 41 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 59 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 150 

New York-NY Department of Health 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Fruits and vegetables 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Some 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA A Few 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 2 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Not Used 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Not Used 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Not Used 

o WIC clinics: Not Used 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment No 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 151 

North Carolina 

FNS Region Southeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $3,231,119 

Total FSNE Outlays $5,596,284 

 Federal $2,798,142 

 Non-federal $2,798,142 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $7 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $2 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 100% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Only a few local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 33% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 6 

 

North Carolina-Forsyth County Health Department 

Type of Organization A local public health department 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Contract 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations 2 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $145,398 

Total Outlays $135,622 

 Federal $67,811 

 Non-Federal $67,811 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 1% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 100% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training - 

 

Target Audience - 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 90 

o Adults (18-59 years) 10 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 50 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 40 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 10 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 152 

North Carolina-Forsyth County Health Department 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Physically active, Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Some 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 2 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Not Used 

o Elderly services site: Not Used 

o WIC clinics: Not Used 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns 1 

 Any Statewide No 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested All messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 153 

North Carolina 

FNS Region Southeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $3,231,119 

Total FSNE Outlays $5,596,284 

 Federal $2,798,142 

 Non-federal $2,798,142 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $7 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $2 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 100% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Only a few local food stampoffices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 33% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 6 

 

North Carolina-Macon County Public Health Center 

Type of Organization A local public health department 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Contract 

Number of Local Projects 1 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations 3 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $85,086 

Total Outlays $75,043 

 Federal $36,096 

 Non-Federal $38,947 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 1% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 100% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 0 

o Adults (18-59 years) 0 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 154 

North Carolina-Macon County Public Health Center 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Healthy weight, Pyramid, Low fat 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Some 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 4 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Not Used 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Not Used 

o Elderly services site: Used-Other-Individual (Self-Taught) 

o WIC clinics: Not Used 

o Health care sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 2 

 Any Statewide No 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 2 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested No messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Few services 
 155 

North Carolina 

FNS Region Southeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $3,231,119 

Total FSNE Outlays $5,596,284 

 Federal $2,798,142 

 Non-federal $2,798,142 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $7 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $2 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 100% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Only a few local food stampoffices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 33% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 6 

 

North Carolina-North Carolina A&T State University 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Contract 

Number of Local Projects 10 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $84,400 

Total Outlays $84,400 

 Federal $42,200 

 Non-Federal $42,200 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 10% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 100% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training Only some required 

 

Target Audience 

 FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 99 

o Adults (18-59 years) 1 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 50 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 48 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 2 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 156 

North Carolina-North Carolina A&T State University 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA None 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 6 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-Group Single Session 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Not Used 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Not Used 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Health care sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Other: 

Indirect Education No 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education N/A 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested No messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: No 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Some services 
 157 

North Carolina 

FNS Region Southeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $3,231,119 

Total FSNE Outlays $5,596,284 

 Federal $2,798,142 

 Non-federal $2,798,142 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $7 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $2 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 100% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Only a few local food stampoffices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 33% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 6 

 

North Carolina-North Carolina Cooperative Extension - NC Nutrition Network 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Contract 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations - 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 1 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $ 

Total Outlays $ 

 Federal $ 

 Non-Federal $ 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 100% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 0% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training - 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 20 

o Adults (18-59 years) 79 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 1 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 100 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 158 

North Carolina-North Carolina Cooperative Extension - NC Nutrition Network 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA - 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA - 

Materials in Other Languages - 

 

Direct Education - 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education N/A 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: N/A

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: N/A

o Public schools (K-12): N/A

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: 

 N/A

o Emergency food assistance sites: N/A

o Elderly services site: N/A

o WIC clinics: N/A

o Health care sites: N/A

o Adult education and training sites N/A

o Work sites: N/A

o Food stores or other retail outlets: N/A

o Homes of FSNE clients: N/A

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: N/A

o Other: N/A

Indirect Education - 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education - 

Social Marketing - 

 Number of Campaigns - 

 Any Statewide - 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) - 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested - 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: No 

o Indirect Education: No 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation - 
 159 

North Carolina 

FNS Region Southeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $3,231,119 

Total FSNE Outlays $5,596,284 

 Federal $2,798,142 

 Non-federal $2,798,142 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $7 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $2 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 100% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Only a few local food stampoffices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 33% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 6 

 

North Carolina-North Carolina Cooperative Extenson - Partners In Wellness 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Contract 

Number of Local Projects 80 

Number of Subcontractors 65 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations - 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $ 

Total Outlays $ 

 Federal $ 

 Non-Federal $ 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 0% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 0% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training - 

 

Target Audience - 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 0 

o Adults (18-59 years) 0 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 160 

North Carolina-North Carolina Cooperative Extenson - Partners In Wellness 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA - 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA - 

Materials in Other Languages - 

 

Direct Education - 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education . 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: - 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: - 

o Public schools (K-12): - 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: - 

o Emergency food assistance sites: - 

o Elderly services site: - 

o WIC clinics: - 

o Health care sites: - 

o Adult education and training sites - 

o Work sites: - 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: - 

o Homes of FSNE clients: - 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: - 

o Other: 

Indirect Education - 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education - 

Social Marketing - 

 Number of Campaigns - 

 Any Statewide - 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) - 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment No 

Proportion of Messages Tested - 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: No 

o Indirect Education: No 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation - 
 161 

North Carolina 

FNS Region Southeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $3,231,119 

Total FSNE Outlays $5,596,284 

 Federal $2,798,142 

 Non-federal $2,798,142 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $7 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $2 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 100% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Only a few local food stampoffices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 33% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 6 

 

North Carolina-North Carolina Division of Aging 

Type of Organization A State Department of Aging orElderly Services 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Memorandum of Understanding 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $ 

Total Outlays $ 

 Federal $ 

 Non-Federal $ 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 100% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 0% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training - 

 

Target Audience - 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 0 

o Adults (18-59 years) 0 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 

 
 162 

North Carolina-North Carolina Division of Aging 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA - 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA - 

Materials in Other Languages - 

 

Direct Education - 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education N/A 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: N/A

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: N/A

o Public schools (K-12): N/A

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: 

 N/A

o Emergency food assistance sites: N/A

o Elderly services site: N/A

o WIC clinics: N/A

o Health care sites: N/A

o Adult education and training sites N/A

o Work sites: N/A

o Food stores or other retail outlets: N/A

o Homes of FSNE clients: N/A

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: N/A

o Other: N/A

Indirect Education - 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education - 

Social Marketing - 

 Number of Campaigns - 

 Any Statewide - 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) - 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment No 

Proportion of Messages Tested - 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: No 

o Indirect Education: No 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation - 
 163 

North Dakota 

FNS Region Mt. Plains 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $1,319,057 

Total FSNE Outlays $2,367,870 

 Federal $1,183,935 

 Non-federal $1,183,935 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $57 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $15 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 0% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE All local food stamp officeswere involved in some manner 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 42% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

North Dakota-North Dakota State University Extension Service 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 53 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $2,638,114 

Total Outlays $2,367,286 

 Federal $1,183,643 

 Non-Federal $1,183,643 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 100% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 62% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience FSP recipients and applicants only 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 3 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 40 

o Adults (18-59 years) 40 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 17 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 164 

North Dakota-North Dakota State University Extension Service 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods, Low fat, Moderate 

sugar intake 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 12 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-Group Single Session 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Single Session 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Health care sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment No 

Proportion of Messages Tested No messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Some services 
 165 

Ohio 

FNS Region Midwest 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $2,500,000 

Total FSNE Outlays $3,844,249 

 Federal $1,652,617 

 Non-federal $2,191,632 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $4 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $1 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 84% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 17% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE 

 Many, but not all, local foodstamp offices were involved in 

FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 25% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

Ohio-Ohio State University Extension 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 72 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 2 

 

IA FSNE Budget $5,168,918 

Total Outlays $5,172,117 

 Federal $2,584,458 

 Non-Federal $2,587,659 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 83% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 47% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 0 

o Adults (18-59 years) 70 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 30 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 40 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 30 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 30 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 166 

Ohio-Ohio State University Extension 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Most 

Materials in Other Languages 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 7 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Not Used 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Not Used 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 1 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested No messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 167 

Oklahoma 

FNS Region Southwest 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $2,545,936 

Total FSNE Outlays $4,700,526 

 Federal $2,350,263 

 Non-federal $2,350,263 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $11 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $4 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 57% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 100% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE 

 Many, but not all, local foodstamp offices were involved in 

FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 50% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 3 

 

Oklahoma-Chickasaw Nation 

Type of Organization A Tribal Council or TribalHealth program 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Contract 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 2 

 

IA FSNE Budget $318,904 

Total Outlays $294,394 

 Federal $147,197 

 Non-Federal $147,197 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 23% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 100% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience Other 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 1 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 3 

o Adults (18-59 years) 66 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 30 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 60 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 10 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 20 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 10 
 168 

Oklahoma-Chickasaw Nation 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA None 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Most 

Materials in Other Languages - 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 3 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Not Used 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Not Used 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Not Used 

o Elderly services site: Not Used 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Health care sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: 

 FDP Grocery Stores Head StartParent Groups-Group Multiple 

Sessions 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 4 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested No messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 169 

Oklahoma 

FNS Region Southwest 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $2,545,936 

Total FSNE Outlays $4,700,526 

 Federal $2,350,263 

 Non-federal $2,350,263 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $11 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $4 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 57% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 100% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE 

 Many, but not all, local foodstamp offices were involved in 

FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 50% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 3 

 

Oklahoma-Oklahoma State University Cooperative Extension Service 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 36 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations 4 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 1 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $4,281,296 

Total Outlays $3,990,562 

 Federal $1,995,281 

 Non-Federal $1,995,281 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 47% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 23% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, voluntary certification 

 

Target Audience 

 FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 0 

o Adults (18-59 years) 78 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 14 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 75 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 21 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 3 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 170 

Oklahoma-Oklahoma State University Cooperative Extension Service 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods, 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Most 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 14 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Health care sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: Tribal Locations-Group Multiple Sessions 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns 1 

 Any Statewide Yes 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested No messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 171 

Oklahoma 

FNS Region Southwest 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $2,545,936 

Total FSNE Outlays $4,700,526 

 Federal $2,350,263 

 Non-federal $2,350,263 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $11 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $4 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 57% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 100% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE 

 Many, but not all, local foodstamp offices were involved in 

FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 50% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 3 

 

Oklahoma-University of Oklahoma-Department of Nutrition Sciences in the College of Allied Health 

Type of Organization 

 A nutrition or public health school/department/college within a 

university 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations 1 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $239,036 

Total Outlays $225,753 

 Federal $106,235 

 Non-Federal $119,518 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 100% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 100% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training Don't know, policy varies 

 

Target Audience FSP recipients and applicants only 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 0 

o Adults (18-59 years) 80 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 20 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 100 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 172 

Oklahoma-University of Oklahoma-Department of Nutrition Sciences in the College of Allied Health 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Most 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 1 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Not Used 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Not Used. 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Not Used 

o Elderly services site: Not Used 

o WIC clinics: Not Used 

o Health care sites: Not Used. 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 1 

 Any Statewide Yes 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 2 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation No services 
 173 

Oregon 

FNS Region Western 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $1,736,776 

Total FSNE Outlays $3,081,371 

 Federal $1,451,310 

 Non-federal $1,630,061 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $7 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $3 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 75% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 67% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 42% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

Oregon-Oregon State University, Extension Family and Community Development 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 19 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $3,405,802 

Total Outlays $3,081,216 

 Federal $1,451,076 

 Non-Federal $1,630,140 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 75% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 0% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 1 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 55 

o Adults (18-59 years) 42 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 2 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 50 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 35 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 15 
 174 

Oregon-Oregon State University, Extension Family and Community Development 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Some 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Most 

Materials in Other Languages 

 Russian, 

Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 11 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-Group Single Session 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Not Used 

o Health care sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: Homes of FSNE clients-Group Multiple Sessions 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment No 

Proportion of Messages Tested No messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Few services 
 175 

Pennsylvania 

FNS Region Mid-Atlantic 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $11,047,379 

Total FSNE Outlays $19,901,334 

 Federal $9,950,667 

 Non-federal $9,950,667 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $21 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $7 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 73% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 33% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE No local food stamp offices wereinvolved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement - 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

Pennsylvania-Pennsylvania Nutrition Education Program 

Type of Organization 

 A department or college, other than public health, within a 

university 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 4 

Number of Subcontractors 15 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations 130 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $27,123,805 

Total Outlays $21,038,340 

 Federal $9,950,667 

 Non-Federal $11,087,673 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 0% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 0% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training Don't know, policy varies 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 0 

o Adults (18-59 years) 0 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 176 

Pennsylvania-Pennsylvania Nutrition Education Program 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Fruits and vegetables 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Don't know 

Materials in Other Languages 

 Hmong, 

Russian, 

Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 7 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-Group Single Session 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Not Used-Group Single Session 

o Health care sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Single Session 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 1 

 Any Statewide Yes 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 1 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 177 

Rhode Island 

FNS Region Did not participate in Review 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $ - 

Total FSNE Outlays $ - 

 Federal $ - 

 Non-federal $ - 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $ - 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $ - 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 0% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 0% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE - 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 0% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

Rhode Island-University of Rhode Island 

Type of Organization 

 A nutrition or public health school/department/college within a 

university 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 1 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $900,900 

Total Outlays $827,566 

 Federal $400,283 

 Non-Federal $427,283 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 100% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 90% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training Don't know, policy varies 

 

Target Audience 

 FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 0 

o Adults (18-59 years) 55 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 45 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 178 

Rhode Island-University of Rhode Island 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Healthy weight, Pyramid, Whole grains, Fruits and vegetables, 

Safe foods, Low fat, Moderate sugar intake 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Most 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 8 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-Group Single Session 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Not Used. 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Not Used 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Not Used 

o Health care sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used. 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Used-Group Single Session 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 4 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 2 

 Any Statewide No 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 5 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 179 

South Carolina 

FNS Region Southeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $771,991 

Total FSNE Outlays $325,328 

 Federal $162,664 

 Non-federal $162,664 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $1 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $0.27 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 50% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 42% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

South Carolina-Clemson University 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 36 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 1 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $1,290,326 

Total Outlays $ 

 Federal $ 

 Non-Federal $ 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 78% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 25% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training All required 

 

Target Audience 

 FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 50 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 0 

o Adults (18-59 years) 20 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 30 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 70 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 30 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 180 

South Carolina-Clemson University 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Pyramid, Whole grains, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods, Low 

fat 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Some 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages - 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 8 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: 

Indirect Education No 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education N/A 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested All messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: No 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation All services 
 181 

South Carolina 

FNS Region Southeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $771,991 

Total FSNE Outlays $325,328 

 Federal $162,664 

 Non-federal $162,664 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $1 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $0.27 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 50% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 42% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

South Carolina-South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Office of Public Health Nutrition 

Type of Organization A division of a State or territorial health department 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 1 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 5 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $253,656 

Total Outlays $ 

 Federal $ 

 Non-Federal $ 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 26% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 100% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 80 

o Adults (18-59 years) 20 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 80 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 10 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 5 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 5 
 182 

South Carolina-South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Office of Public Health Nutrition 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Physically active, Pyramid, Whole grains, Fruits and vegetables, 

Low fat 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Most 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages - 

 

Direct Education No 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education N/A 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: N/A 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: N/A 

o Public schools (K-12): N/A 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: N/A 

o Emergency food assistance sites: 

o Elderly services site: N/A 

o WIC clinics: N/A 

o Health care sites: N/A 

o Adult education and training sites N/A 

o Work sites: N/A 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: 

o Homes of FSNE clients: N/A 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: N/A 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 1 

 Any Statewide No 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 2 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 183 

South Dakota 

FNS Region Mt. Plains 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $378,483 

Total FSNE Outlays $449,849 

 Federal $224,925 

 Non-federal $224,924 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $8 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $2 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 17% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE All local food stamp officeswere involved in some manner 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 42% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

South Dakota-South Dakota State University Cooperative Extension Service 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 9 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations 5 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $756,966 

Total Outlays $530,377 

 Federal $224,925 

 Non-Federal $305,452 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 21% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 22% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 65 

o Adults (18-59 years) 15 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 20 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 40 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 30 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 30 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 184 

South Dakota-South Dakota State University Cooperative Extension Service 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Most 

Materials in Other Languages - 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 7 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Other: 

Indirect Education No 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education N/A 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment No 

Proportion of Messages Tested No messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation No services 
 185 

Tennessee 

FNS Region Southeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $2,350,204 

Total FSNE Outlays $4,700,408 

 Federal $2,350,204 

 Non-federal $2,350,204 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $6 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $2 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 67% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE All local food stamp officeswere involved in some manner 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 42% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

Tennessee-Tennessee State University, Nutrition Education Program (NEP) 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations 20 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $ 

Total Outlays $598,232 

 Federal $299,116 

 Non-Federal $299,116 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 3% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 66% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, voluntary certification 

 

Target Audience Other 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 1 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 15 

o Adults (18-59 years) 75 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 9 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 80 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 10 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 10 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 186 

Tennessee-Tennessee State University, Nutrition Education Program (NEP) 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Pyramid, Whole grains, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA A Few 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 10 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Health care sites: Not Used. 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: Family Resource Centers-Group Single Session 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 3 

 Any Statewide Yes 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 2 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Some services 
 187 

Tennessee 

FNS Region Southeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $2,350,204 

Total FSNE Outlays $4,700,408 

 Federal $2,350,204 

 Non-federal $2,350,204 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $6 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $2 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 67% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE All local food stamp officeswere involved in some manner 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 42% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 2 

 

Tennessee-University of Tennessee, Agricultural Extension Service: 

Tennessee Nutrition & Consumer Education Program (TNCEP) 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 95 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 4 

 

IA FSNE Budget $4,022,490 

Total Outlays $3,601,510 

 Federal $1,800,755 

 Non-Federal $1,800,755 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 98% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 70% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience FSP recipients and applicants only 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 5 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 70 

o Adults (18-59 years) 20 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 5 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 188 

Tennessee-University of Tennessee, Agricultural Extension Service: 

Tennessee Nutrition & Consumer Education Program (TNCEP) 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Healthy weight, Pyramid, Whole grains, Fruits and vegetables, 

Safe foods, Moderate sugar intake 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Most 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 11 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Health care sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 3 

 Any Statewide Yes 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 6 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Some services 
 189 

Texas 

FNS Region Southwest 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $3,536,152 

Total FSNE Outlays $4,542,530 

 Federal $2,271,265 

 Non-federal $2,271,265 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $2 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $1 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 89% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 50% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 42% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 6 

 

Texas-Corpus Christi Food Bank 

Type of Organization An emergency food provider, such as a food bank or pantry 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Contract 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $27,420 

Total Outlays $ 

 Federal $ 

 Non-Federal $ 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 0% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 0% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 0 

o Adults (18-59 years) 0 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 40 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 30 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 30 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 190 

Texas-Corpus Christi Food Bank 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Healthy weight, Physically active, Pyramid, Whole grains, 

Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods, Low fat, Moderate sugar 

intake, Less salt, Alcohol in Moderation 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Most 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 5 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Not Used 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Not Used 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Elderly services site: Not Used 

o WIC clinics: Not Used 

o Health care sites: Used 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: Rehab Center-Group Multiple Sessions 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 2 

 Any Statewide No 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 2 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 191 

Texas 

FNS Region Southwest 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $3,536,152 

Total FSNE Outlays $4,542,530 

 Federal $2,271,265 

 Non-federal $2,271,265 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $2 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $1 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 89% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 33% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 42% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 6 

 

Texas-Houston Food Bank 

Type of Organization An emergency food provider, suchas a food bank or pantry 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Contract 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations - 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $ 

Total Outlays $ 

 Federal $ 

 Non-Federal $ 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 7% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 100% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 40 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 25 

o Adults (18-59 years) 25 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 10 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 25 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 40 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 20 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 15 
 192 

Texas-Houston Food Bank 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Healthy weight, Physically active, Pyramid, Whole grains, 

Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods, Low fat, Moderate sugar 

intake, Less salt 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Some 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 3 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Not Used 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Not Used 

o Elderly services site: Not Used 

o WIC clinics: Not Used 

o Health care sites: Not Used. 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Used-Group Single Session 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested All messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Some services 
 193 

Texas 

FNS Region Southwest 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $3,536,152 

Total FSNE Outlays $4,542,530 

 Federal $2,271,265 

 Non-federal $2,271,265 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $2 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $1 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 89% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 33% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 42% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 6 

 

Texas-San Antonio Food Bank 

Type of Organization An emergency food provider, suchas a food bank or pantry 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Contract 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $117,944 

Total Outlays $57,459 

 Federal $28,560 

 Non-Federal $28,899 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 6% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 100% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, voluntary certification 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 15 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 30 

o Adults (18-59 years) 15 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 40 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 100 
 194 

Texas-San Antonio Food Bank 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 4 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Not Used 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Not Used 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment No 

Proportion of Messages Tested All messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 195 

Texas 

FNS Region Southwest 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $3,536,152 

Total FSNE Outlays $4,542,530 

 Federal $2,271,265 

 Non-federal $2,271,265 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $2 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $1 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 89% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 50% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 42% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 6 

 

Texas-South Plains Food Bank 

Type of Organization An emergency food provider, such as a food bank or pantry 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Contract 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $28,794 

Total Outlays $29,729 

 Federal $14,397 

 Non-Federal $15,332 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 0% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 100% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 47 

o Adults (18-59 years) 53 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 196 

Texas-South Plains Food Bank 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Pyramid, Whole grains, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Most 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 4 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Not Used 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Single Session 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Not Used 

o WIC clinics: Not Used 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 3 

 Any Statewide No 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 1 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: Yes 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Few services 
 197 

Texas 

FNS Region Southwest 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $3,536,152 

Total FSNE Outlays $4,542,530 

 Federal $2,271,265 

 Non-federal $2,271,265 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $2 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $1 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 89% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 33% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 42% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 6 

 

Texas-Tarrant Area Food Bank 

Type of Organization An emergency food provider, such as a food bank or pantry 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Contract 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations - 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $ 

Total Outlays $ 

 Federal $ 

 Non-Federal $ 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 0% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 0% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training - 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 0 

o Adults (18-59 years) 0 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 198 

Texas-Tarrant Area Food Bank 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA - 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA - 

Materials in Other Languages - 

 

Direct Education No 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education N/A 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 0 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested - 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: No 

o Indirect Education: No 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation - 
 199 

Texas 

FNS Region Southwest 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $3,536,152 

Total FSNE Outlays $4,542,530 

 Federal $2,271,265 

 Non-federal $2,271,265 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $2 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $1 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 89% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 0% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 42% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 6 

 

Texas-Texas A&M Cooperative Extension 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 223 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $6,232,200 

Total Outlays $4,960,922 

 Federal $2,480,461 

 Non-Federal $2,480,461 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 88% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 75% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 0 

o Adults (18-59 years) 0 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 37 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 30 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 24 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 9 
 200 

Texas-Texas A&M Cooperative Extension 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Most 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 11 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Some services 
 201 

Utah 

FNS Region Mt. Plains 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $351,270 

Total FSNE Outlays $751,500 

 Federal $351,270 

 Non-federal $400,230 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $6 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $1 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 83% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 67% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 42% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

Utah-Utah State University 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Contract 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 8 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $650,000 

Total Outlays $751,500 

 Federal $351,270 

 Non-Federal $400,230 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 83% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 50% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 0 

o Adults (18-59 years) 0 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 202 

Utah-Utah State University 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education No 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education N/A 

Indirect Education No 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education N/A 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment No 

Proportion of Messages Tested All messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation No services 
 203 

Vermont 

FNS Region Northeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $235,466 

Total FSNE Outlays $433,836 

 Federal $216,918 

 Non-federal $216,918 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $10 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $3 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 100% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE No local food stamp offices wereinvolved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement - 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 5 

 

Vermont-Bennington Rutland Opportunity Council (BROC) 

Type of Organization An emergency food provider, such as a food bank or pantry 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Other 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 1 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $8,524 

Total Outlays $8,524 

 Federal $4,262 

 Non-Federal $4,262 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 14% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 100% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience Other 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 11 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 22 

o Adults (18-59 years) 55 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 12 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 57 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 27 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 16 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 204 

Vermont-Bennington Rutland Opportunity Council (BROC) 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Physically active, Pyramid, Whole grains, Fruits and vegetables, 

Low fat, Moderate sugar intake, Less salt 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA A Few 

Materials in Other Languages 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 4 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Not Used 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Not Used 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o WIC clinics: Not Used 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Other: 

Indirect Education No 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education N/A 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment No 

Proportion of Messages Tested No messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: No 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation All services 
 205 

Vermont 

FNS Region Northeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $235,466 

Total FSNE Outlays $433,836 

 Federal $216,918 

 Non-federal $216,918 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $10 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $3 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 100% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE No local food stamp offices wereinvolved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement - 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 5 

 

Vermont-Central Vermont Community Action Council (CVCAC) 

Type of Organization An emergency food provider, such as a food bank or pantry 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Othe 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 2 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $14,000 

Total Outlays $12,040 

 Federal $6,020 

 Non-Federal $6,020 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 21% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 100% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training All required 

 

Target Audience Other 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 0 

o Adults (18-59 years) 0 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 56 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 30 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 14 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 206 

Vermont-Central Vermont Community Action Council (CVCAC) 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Physically active, Pyramid, Whole grains, Fruits and vegetables, 

Safe foods, Low fat, Moderate sugar intake, Less salt 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA None 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA None 

Materials in Other Languages - 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 3 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Not Used 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Not Used 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o WIC clinics: Not Used 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: 

Indirect Education No 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education N/A 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment No 

Proportion of Messages Tested All messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: No 

o Indirect Education: No 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation All services 
 207 

Vermont 

FNS Region Northeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $235,466 

Total FSNE Outlays $433,836 

 Federal $216,918 

 Non-federal $216,918 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $10 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $3 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 100% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE No local food stamp offices wereinvolved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement - 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 5 

 

Vermont-Champlain Valley Office of Economic Opportunity (CVOEO) 

Type of Organization 

 Other: A Community Action Program -private non-profit 501 

C3 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Other0 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 2 

 

IA FSNE Budget $41,822 

Total Outlays $41,822 

 Federal $20,911 

 Non-Federal $20,911 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 29% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 100% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 1 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 33 

o Adults (18-59 years) 33 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 33 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 70 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 5 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 25 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 208 

Vermont-Champlain Valley Office of Economic Opportunity (CVOEO) 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Some 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Most 

Materials in Other Languages Vietnamese 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 0 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Not Used 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Not Used 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Not Used 

o Elderly services site: Not Used 

o WIC clinics: Not Used 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 0 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment No 

Proportion of Messages Tested No messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 209 

Vermont 

FNS Region Northeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $235,466 

Total FSNE Outlays $433,836 

 Federal $216,918 

 Non-federal $216,918 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $10 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $3 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 100% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE No local food stamp offices wereinvolved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement - 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 5 

 

Vermont-University of Vermont 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Other0 

Number of Local Projects 11 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $269,120 

Total Outlays $262,876 

 Federal $131,438 

 Non-Federal $131,438 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 100% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 71% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience Other 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 2 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 20 

o Adults (18-59 years) 28 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 50 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 210 

Vermont-University of Vermont 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Healthy weight, Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Most 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA A Few 

Materials in Other Languages 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 6 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Single Session 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Not Used 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Single Session 

o WIC clinics: Not Used 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

 1)Offices of other agencies 2)Low-income housing projectsDelivery Mode Unknown 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested No messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 211 

Vermont 

FNS Region Northeast 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $235,466 

Total FSNE Outlays $433,836 

 Federal $216,918 

 Non-federal $216,918 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $10 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $3 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 100% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE No local food stamp offices wereinvolved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement - 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 5 

 

Vermont-Vermont Campaign to End Childhood Hunger 

Type of Organization 

 Other: A private non-profit thatpromotes good nutrition and use 

of the federal nutrition programs forchildren and families. 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Other0 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 2 

 

IA FSNE Budget $53,100 

Total Outlays $53,100 

 Federal $26,550 

 Non-Federal $26,550 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 79% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 100% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training - 

 

Target Audience Other 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 17 

o Adults (18-59 years) 83 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 47 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 10 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 40 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 3 
 212 

Vermont-Vermont Campaign to End Childhood Hunger 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Pyramid, Whole grains, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods, Low 

fat 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages - 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 6 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Not Used 

o Elderly services site: Not Used 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: Community center public library-Group Multiple Sessions 

Indirect Education No 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education N/A 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment No 

Proportion of Messages Tested No messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: No 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation All services 
 213 

Virginia 

FNS Region Mid-Atlantic 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $3,313,274 

Total FSNE Outlays $5,114,507 

 Federal $2,557,254 

 Non-federal $2,557,253 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $11 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $3 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 91% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 67% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 17% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

Virginia-Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 5 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 4 

 

IA FSNE Budget $6,627,130 

Total Outlays $6,094,912 

 Federal $2,781,056 

 Non-Federal $3,313,856 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 91% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 10% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training All required 

 

Target Audience 

 FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 11 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 54 

o Adults (18-59 years) 25 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 10 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 40 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 30 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 30 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 214 

Virginia-Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods, Moderate sugar 

intake 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Most 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish,Vietnamese 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 8 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Not Used 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Single Session 

o Health care sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education No 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education N/A 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation All services 
 215 

Washington 

FNS Region Western 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $6,136,982 

Total FSNE Outlays $8,387,780 

 Federal $4,486,687 

 Non-federal $3,901,093 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $18 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $5 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 95% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 0% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Only a few local food stampoffices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 25% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 3 

 

Washington-Department of Social and Health Services, Aging and Disability Services Administration 

Type of Organization A State Department of Aging orElderly Services 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 4 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $119,672 

Total Outlays $82,498 

 Federal $43,746 

 Non-Federal $38,752 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 15% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 0% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training - 

 

Target Audience - 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 0 

o Adults (18-59 years) 0 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 216 

Washington-Department of Social and Health Services, Aging and Disability Services Administration 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized - 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA - 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA - 

Materials in Other Languages - 

 

Direct Education - 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education N/A 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: N/A

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: N/A

o Public schools (K-12): N/A

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: 

 N/A

o Emergency food assistance sites: N/A

o Elderly services site: N/A

o WIC clinics: N/A

o Health care sites: N/A

o Adult education and training sites N/A

o Work sites: N/A

o Food stores or other retail outlets: N/A

o Homes of FSNE clients: N/A

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: N/A

o Other: N/A

Indirect Education - 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education - 

Social Marketing - 

 Number of Campaigns - 

 Any Statewide - 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) - 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment No 

Proportion of Messages Tested - 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: No 

o Indirect Education: No 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation - 
 217 

Washington 

FNS Region Western 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $6,136,982 

Total FSNE Outlays $8,387,780 

 Federal $4,486,687 

 Non-federal $3,901,093 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $18 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $5 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 95% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 0% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Only a few local food stampoffices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 25% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 3 

 

Washington-Washington State Department of Health 

Type of Organization A division of a State or territorial health department 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 25 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations - 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 1 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $4,441,089 

Total Outlays $3,031,147 

 Federal $1,357,334 

 Non-Federal $1,673,813 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 33% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 85% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training Don't know, policy varies 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 30 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 20 

o Adults (18-59 years) 25 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 25 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 218 

Washington-Washington State Department of Health 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Healthy weight, Physically active, Fruits and vegetables 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA None 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages 

 Russian, 

Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 10 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Health care sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Single Session 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Few services 
 219 

Washington 

FNS Region Western 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $6,136,982 

Total FSNE Outlays $8,387,780 

 Federal $4,486,687 

 Non-federal $3,901,093 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $18 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $5 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 95% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 0% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Only a few local food stampoffices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 25% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 3 

 

Washington-Washington State University 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 21 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations 20 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 2 

 

IA FSNE Budget $6,917,407 

Total Outlays $4,775,231 

 Federal $2,586,703 

 Non-Federal $2,188,528 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 54% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 84% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 0 

o Adults (18-59 years) 0 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 0 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 0 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 0 
 220 

Washington-Washington State University 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods, Low fat, Moderate 

sugar intake 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Some 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages 

 Cambodian 

Russian, 

Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 2 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Not Used 

o Elderly services site: Not Used 

o WIC clinics: Not Used 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Not Used 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: 

Indirect Education - 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education - 

Social Marketing Yes 

 Number of Campaigns 1 

 Any Statewide Yes 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) 0 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 221 

West Virginia 

FNS Region Mid-Atlantic 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $1,152,204 

Total FSNE Outlays $2,063,283 

 Federal $1,031,641 

 Non-federal $1,031,642 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $8 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $3 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 62% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 17% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Some local food stamp offices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 58% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

West Virginia-West Virginia University 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 34 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 2 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $2,304,783 

Total Outlays $2,121,888 

 Federal $1,031,641 

 Non-Federal $1,090,247 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 62% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 70% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training All required 

 

Target Audience 

 FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 50 

o Adults (18-59 years) 35 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 15 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 45 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 25 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 20 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 10 
 222 

West Virginia-West Virginia University 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages - 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 6 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Not Used 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Elderly services site: Not Used 

o WIC clinics: Not Used 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested All messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 223 

Wisconsin 

FNS Region Midwest 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $6,673,726 

Total FSNE Outlays $11,470,301 

 Federal $5,822,188 

 Non-federal $5,648,113 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $35 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $9 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 82% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 0% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Only a few local food stampoffices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 25% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 3 

 

Wisconsin-Great Lakes Inter-Tribal Council 

Type of Organization A Tribal Council or TribalHealth program 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Contract 

Number of Local Projects 1 

Number of Subcontractors 4 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 2 

 

IA FSNE Budget $322,408 

Total Outlays $302,177 

 Federal $218,857 

 Non-Federal $83,320 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 10% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 35% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, no certification program available 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 30 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 10 

o Adults (18-59 years) 45 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 15 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 40 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 20 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 35 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 5 
 224 

Wisconsin-Great Lakes Inter-Tribal Council 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Physically active, Fruits and vegetables 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA A Few 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 9 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Single Session 

o WIC clinics: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Health care sites: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 225 

Wisconsin 

FNS Region Midwest 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $6,673,726 

Total FSNE Outlays $11,470,301 

 Federal $5,822,188 

 Non-federal $5,648,113 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $35 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $9 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 82% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 0% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Only a few local food stampoffices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 25% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 3 

 

Wisconsin-Ho-Chunk Nation 

Type of Organization A Tribal Council or TribalHealth program 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Contract 

Number of Local Projects 0 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 0 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 0 

 

IA FSNE Budget $85,386 

Total Outlays $64,518 

 Federal $46,466 

 Non-Federal $18,052 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 15% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 75% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, voluntary certification 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 18 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 22 

o Adults (18-59 years) 40 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 20 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 35 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 55 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 10 
 226 

Wisconsin-Ho-Chunk Nation 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Physically active, Pyramid, Whole grains, Fruits and vegetables, 

Low fat 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Most 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Some 

Materials in Other Languages 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 5 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Not Used 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Not Used 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Not Used 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Not Used 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: 

 Head Start Centers FoodDistribution Center-Group Multiple 

Sessions 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services 
 227 

Wisconsin 

FNS Region Midwest 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $6,673,726 

Total FSNE Outlays $11,470,301 

 Federal $5,822,188 

 Non-federal $5,648,113 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $35 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $9 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 82% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 0% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE Only a few local food stampoffices were involved in FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 25% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 3 

 

Wisconsin-University of Wisconsin-Extension 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 39 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network Yes 

Number of Network Member Organizations 7 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 1 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 2 

 

IA FSNE Budget $12,736,688 

Total Outlays $11,189,297 

 Federal $5,561,074 

 Non-Federal $5,628,223 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 82% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 100% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training None required, voluntary certification 

 

Target Audience 

 Low income population (household income at or below 185% of 

poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 3 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 45 

o Adults (18-59 years) 38 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 14 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 0 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 70 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 0 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 30 
 228 

Wisconsin-University of Wisconsin-Extension 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized Physically active, Pyramid, Fruits and vegetables 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Some 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA Most 

Materials in Other Languages 

 Hmong, 

Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 8 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-Group Single Session 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Not Used 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Not Used 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 2 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Some services 
 229 

Wyoming 

FNS Region Mt. Plains 

Approved Federal FSNE Budget $1,500,982 

Total FSNE Outlays $2,726,172 

 Federal $1,363,085 

 Non-federal $1,363,087 

Average FSNE Outlay Per FSP Participant $106 

Average FSNE Outlay Per Low-Income Person 

(<=185% Poverty) $22 

% of Counties with Any FSNE Services 100% 

% of Developmental Activities with Moderate or 

High SFSA Involvement 33% 

Portion of Local FSP Offices Involved in FSNE 

 Many, but not all, local foodstamp offices were involved in 

FSNE 

% of Types of Local FSP Office Involvement 33% 

Number of FSNE Implementing Agencies 1 

 

Wyoming-University of Wyoming 

Type of Organization The Cooperative Extension Service of a Land-Grant University 

Type of Agreement with SFSA Interagency Agreement 

Number of Local Projects 18 

Number of Subcontractors 0 

Nutrition Network No 

Number of Network Member Organizations N/A 

Number of Other Formal IA Partners 6 

Number of USDA Programs with which Well 

Coordinated 1 

 

IA FSNE Budget $2,740,430 

Total Outlays $2,740,429 

 Federal $1,363,086 

 Non-Federal $1,377,343 

% of Counties in State IA Served with FSNE 100% 

 

% of FSNE Providers with College Degree or More 50% 

Proportion of Paraprofessional Staff with 

Standardized Training All required 

 

Target Audience 

 FSP recipients and eligibles only (household income at or below 

130% of poverty) 

Estimates of Participant Demographics: 

 Age 

o Infants and Young Children (<5 years) 0 

o School-Age Children (5-17 years) 50 

o Adults (18-59 years) 45 

o Elderly Adults (60+ years) 5 

Food Stamp Program Participation Status 

o Food stamp recipients and applicants 23 

o Food stamp eligible non-participants 

(<=130% poverty) 48 

o Other low-income persons (<=185% 

poverty) 20 

o Other persons (185%+ of poverty) 9 
 230 

Wyoming-University of Wyoming 

Dietary Guidelines Highly Emphasized 

 Pyramid, Whole grains, Fruits and vegetables, Safe foods, 

Moderate sugar intake 

Proportion of Materials Originated/Developed by IA Most 

Proportion of Materials Originated 

Elsewhere/Customized by IA A Few 

Materials in Other Languages Spanish 

 

Direct Education Yes 

 Number of Different Settings for Direct Education 10 

 Most Typical Mode of Direct Education 

o Food Stamp Offices: Used-Group Single Session 

o Local Cooperative Extension Offices: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Public schools (K-12): Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Youth education sites, such as preschools, 

day care, YMCA, etc: Used-Group Single Session 

o Emergency food assistance sites: Used-One-on-One Single Session 

o Elderly services site: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o WIC clinics: Used-Group Single Session 

o Health care sites: Not Used 

o Adult education and training sites Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Work sites: Not Used 

o Food stores or other retail outlets: Not Used 

o Homes of FSNE clients: Used-One-on-One with MultipleSessions 

o Churches/faith-based organization sites: Used-Group Multiple Sessions 

o Other: 

Indirect Education Yes 

 Number of Different Communication 

 Channels for Indirect Education 3 

Social Marketing No 

 Number of Campaigns N/A 

 Any Statewide N/A 

 Number of Different Media Channels 

 Used in Campaign(s) N/A 

 

Conducted Any Needs Assessment Yes 

Proportion of Messages Tested Some messages were tested 

Collected Any Implementation/Process Data 

o Social Marketing: No 

o Direct Education: Yes 

o Indirect Education: Yes 

Portion of Services Subject to Outcome Evaluation Many services