alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 286.6 Maintenance of records.

Each collector and remitter shall maintain records necessary for the Service to verify the accuracy of fees collected and remitted and to otherwise determine compliance with the applicable statutes and regulations. Such records shall be maintained for a period of two years from the date of fee collection. Each remitter shall advise the Assistant Commissioner, Office of Financial Management of the name, address, and telephone number of a responsible officer who shall have the authority to verify and produce any records required to be maintained under this part. The Assistant Commissioner, Office of Financial Management shall be promptly notified of any changes of the responsible officer.

[53 FR 5757, Feb. 26, 1988, as amended at 59 FR 49349, Sept. 28, 1994; 63 FR 51272, Sept. 25, 1998]
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE FLIGHT STANDARDS AGENCY

GLOBAL ACCESS FOR AMERICA 20 Mar 2013

MEMORANDUM FOR HQ FAA/AGC-10

FROM: HQ AFFSA/A3OF HQ AFFSA/AJW31AF Bldg 4, Room 107

6500 S. MacArthur Blvd Oklahoma City, OK 73169

SUBJECT: FAR Exemption 134M (Regulatory Docket FAA-2001-9410)

1. FAR Exemption 134, was granted to the United States Air Force on 1 Sep 70, as amended by 134M on 9 Jul 2010, it exempts us from the provisions of Section 91.159. Our requirement to conduct photographic reconnaissance flights under the provisions of this exemption remains unchanged. We hereby request that the current exemption be renewed, IAW 14 CFR Part 11.

2. As this is a longstanding exemption the Department of the Air Force requests that the expiration date of this exemption be extended to five years from the date of approval.

3. Please contact me with any questions: (405) 734-8424 or e-mail hqaffsa.a3of@tinker.af.mil

. We appreciate your assistance.

ALAN W. MYRICK, Major, USAF Chief, Aircrew Procedures
§ 222.51 Which children may a local educational agency count for payment under section 8003(d) of the Act? ( a ) An LEA may count children described in sections 8003(a)(1)(A)(ii), (a)(1)(B), (a)(1)(C), and (a)(1)(D) of the Act who are eligible for services under the provisions of Part B or Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 *et seq.*) (IDEA), for the purpose of computing a payment under section 8003(d) in accordance with the provisions of this section.
( b ) ( 1 ) An LEA may count a child with a disability described in paragraph (a) of this section who attends a private school or residential program if the LEA has placed or referred the child in accordance with the provisions of section 613 of the IDEA and 34 CFR part 300, subparts C and D.
( 2 ) An LEA may not count a child with a disability described in paragraph (a) of this section who is placed in a private school by his or her parents, but that child may participate in public school programs that use section 8003(d) funds.
( c ) An LEA may count infants and toddlers with disabilities described in paragraph (a) of this section if— ( 1 ) The LEA provides early intervention services or FAPE to each of those children— ( i ) Either directly or through an arrangement with another entity; and
( ii ) The State does not charge a fee or other out-of-pocket cost to the child's parents under the State's system of payments on file with the Secretary required under 34 CFR 303.203(b)(1), 303.520, and 303.521, and there is no other cost to the child's parents (the costs of premiums do not count as out-of-pocket costs); and
( 2 ) Each of those children has an IFSP or IEP (as appropriate).
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1400 *et seq.* and 7703(d))
[80 FR 33166, June 11, 2015]
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report of Senetek PLC, (the Company) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2009 as filed
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John P. Ryan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: April 15, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ JOHN P. RYAN       
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | John P. Ryan           
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
# Official Journal L 143/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 143 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 603 June 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 143

English edition

Legislation

Volume 603 June 2017

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/949 of 2 June 2017 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the configuration of the identification code for bovine animals and amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 911/2004 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/950 of 2 June 2017 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1068/2011 as regards the minimum content of the preparation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase produced by Aspergillus niger (CBS 109.713) and endo-1,4-beta-glucanase produced by Aspergillus niger (DSM 18404) as a feed additive for chickens reared for laying and all avian species for laying (holder of authorisation BASF SE) (
  1
  ) | 5 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Decision (EU) 2017/951 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund following an application from Finland — EGF/2016/008 FI/Nokia Network Systems | 9 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/949 of 2 June 2017 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the configuration of the identification code for bovine animals and amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 911/2004 (
  1
  )

1

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/950 of 2 June 2017 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1068/2011 as regards the minimum content of the preparation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase produced by Aspergillus niger (CBS 109.713) and endo-1,4-beta-glucanase produced by Aspergillus niger (DSM 18404) as a feed additive for chickens reared for laying and all avian species for laying (holder of authorisation BASF SE) (
  1
  )

Aspergillus niger

Aspergillus niger

1

5

DECISIONS

*

Decision (EU) 2017/951 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund following an application from Finland — EGF/2016/008 FI/Nokia Network Systems

9

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 14,109

 13,234

 12,330

 12,180

 12,318

 12,621

 13,204

 12,980

 12,502

 12,356

 11,623

 12,573

 13,926

 15,209

 16,398

 17,336

 17,115

 14,506

 13,230

 12,189

 12,542

 11,824

 11,929

 12,150

 13,069

 14,458

 14,942

 15,935

 15,226

 15,242

 4,644

 4,479

 4,028

 3,728

 3,681

 3,783

 3,754

 6,051

 4,867

 4,187

 4,484

 4,319

 4,530

 5,038

 4,561

 5,173

 5,308

 5,863

 5,312

 4,793

 4,732

 3,993

 3,588

 3,884

 3,179

 3,732

 3,749

 4,230

 4,068

 4,277

 8,655

 8,102

 7,941

 7,876

 7,618

 7,814

 8,961

 9,385

 8,575

 8,321

 7,571

 7,695

 8,563

 8,876

 9,574

 10,156

 10,309

 9,739

 8,915

 8,481

 8,498

 7,609

 7,097

 7,259

 7,482

 7,917

 8,382

 9,367

 8,929

 9,006

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 7, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §90b. Land acquisition; authority of Secretary; manner and place; donation of State lands; transfer to administrative jurisdiction of Secretary; elimination of lands from national forests

(a) 1 Within the boundaries of the park and recreation areas, the Secretary of the Interior (hereinafter referred to in this subchapter as the "Secretary") may acquire lands, waters, and interests therein by donation, purchase with donated or appropriated funds, or exchange, except that he may not acquire any such interests within the recreation areas without the consent of the owner, so long as the lands are devoted to uses compatible with the purposes of this subchapter. Lands owned by the State of Washington or any political subdivision thereof may be acquired only by donation. Federal property within the boundaries of the park and recreation areas is hereby transferred to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary for administration by him as part of the park and recreation areas. The national forest land within such boundaries is hereby eliminated from the national forests within which it was heretofore located.

(b) The Secretary is hereby authorized to acquire, with the consent of the owner, lands outside of the authorized boundaries of North Cascades National Park Service Complex for the purpose of construction and operation of a backcountry information center not to exceed five acres. The Secretary of the Interior is further authorized to acquire with the consent of the owner, lands for the construction of a headquarters and administrative site or sites, for the North Cascades National Park, Ross Lake National Recreation Area, and Lake Chelan National Recreation Area not to exceed ten acres. The lands so acquired shall be managed as part of the park.

(Pub. L. 90–544, title III, §301, Oct. 2, 1968, 82 Stat. 927; Pub. L. 100–668, title II, §203, Nov. 16, 1988, 102 Stat. 3963.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–668 added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Boundary Adjustments for Road

Pub. L. 100–668, title II, §207, as added by Pub. L. 113–291, div. B, title XXX, §3040, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3788, authorized Secretary to adjust boundaries of North Cascades National Park and Stephen Mather Wilderness in order to provide a 100-foot-wide corridor along which the Stehekin Valley Road could be rebuilt and directed that such adjustment be made so that equal acreage amounts would be exchanged, resulting in no net loss of acreage to either the Park or the Wilderness.

1 Subsec. (a) designation editorially supplied.
### §90d–2. State rights or privileges in property within recreation area used for certain highway unaffected

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to affect adversely or to authorize any Federal agency to take any action that would affect adversely any rights or privileges of the State of Washington in property within the Ross Lake National Recreation Area which is being utilized for the North Cross State Highway.

(Pub. L. 90–544, title V, §503, Oct. 2, 1968, 82 Stat. 929.)
g:\blm\buttermp\ams\FinalFigures\Fig2-15_WildlifeCorridors8511.mxd 

Butte 

Helena 

Bozeman 

Boulder 

Big Sky 

Townsend 

Gardiner 

Belgrade 

Anaconda 

Whitehall 

Livingston 

Three Forks 

East Helena 

West Yellowstone 

Deerlodge

County 

Silverbow

County 

Lewis and Clark 

County 

Broadwater 

County 

Gallatin

Coun ty 

Park

County 

Meagher

County Powell

County

Granite

Coun ty 

Beaverhead

County 

Madison

County 

Wheatland

County 

Sweet Grass

County 

Stillwater 

Coun ty 

Yellowstone National

Park 

Freemont

County 

Clark

County 

Jefferson

County 

§ ̈¦15 

§ ̈¦15 

§ ̈¦90 

§ ̈¦90 

£¤12 

£¤12 

WYOMING

IDAHO 

MONTANA 

IDAHO 

Cascade

County 

I
 Wildlife Corridors 0 Miles 25
 Butte Field Office - EIS

No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management (BLM) for use of RMP Planning Area, Montana 

data for purposes not intended by BLM. FIGURE 2-15
 Core Areas Higher Quality Corridors Lower Quality Corridors
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001102939
<NAME> BIOPULSE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                         104,189
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  139,440
<ALLOWANCES>                                    26,500
<INVENTORY>                                     83,502
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               464,543
<PP&E>                                         951,981
<DEPRECIATION>                                 103,743
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,162,812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,054,886
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,464
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,100,462
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,162,812
<SALES>                                      1,159,680
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,159,680
<CGS>                                          398,359
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  398,359
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               679,803
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 81,518
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             81,518
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    81,518
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
#### Jamal A. AZEEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Paul KIRBY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 00-7543.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 30, 2002.

Decided May 15, 2002.

Jamal A. Azeez, Appellant Pro Se. Scott E. Johnson, Dawn Ellen Warfield, Office of the Attorney General of West Virginia, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

*139Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Jamal A. Azeez seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001), and denying his motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record, the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and the district court’s order denying post judgment relief, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.**See Azeez v. Kirby,*No. CA-98-523-5 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 28, 2000; Dec. 21, 2001). We deny Azeez’s motions for appointment of counsel and his motions to remand and to file a formal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

 We note that the district court should have considered the post judgment motion as under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e), rather than Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), because the motion was executed within ten days of the entry of judgment. *See Dove v. CODESCO,*569 F.2d 807, 809 (4th Cir.1978). We find, however, that relief was properly denied. *See Collison v. International Chem. Workers Union,*34 F.3d 233, 236 (4th Cir.1994).
!
 	


"


#$%&'%()*+',-

 	
%(

./0#122032445'

2/34/2,26

788)'7#699	#		

	6

	
2



0	:


6

9

	 
	!
 	


"


 
 	


"


	

2 !	
594
!	

2







	




				

		







2/022;"
 
 %& 	<		
678%=6 0

./0#122032445'2/34/2,26788)'7#6

99	#		

	6	
2

! 	!	
	>


4

#9
6
?


$7(+&)

;	!09		6
?


$7)%**

0	!9		66
?


$@%8*8

2 !	
<94	

6
?


$&@(+8

0	
,9	 	
	
.	6
?


$(+=@@

.	
926
?


$&)(@*

 	
A
B6..5

*8%5	
B	678(

 
		6
	7((78

C&8(D++@'*=88

%)'7)8+%&

Case 17-13654-BFK Doc 37 Filed 01/30/18 Entered 01/30/18 17:12:42 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 4
3

 	 	!	
	!
"%%999E()7	"

	%%999E

%(8%C	D 	
!6	 

 
>	

255#4 
6 	 0	


! 	!	
	%%

999E()7C	D
	


	
"'
CDC%D>	

2,2/55#4 
6"	
	
B 	
		
!

6 	   
B	
	
	
 !	6 
6

	




B  !"	

	 
	



" 
	
9

26/F6<4636# 	 	!	
	!


"%%999E()7C	D
!
! !		





		


 




	

	 
	

		%(8=85	



6/
6

78%&%6	
!
	
	


"	
B


.%++6%''(6;33.#5-6	
 
	!		

	6		



%8*8%65	%**&6	! .	

,	
	6
	9

B   
 
 	     
 	

 	   


 
	  	B   
 	

  	 
 

	

		B6	
!	"

	
6"	



 

9

26,2/<4636#6 		?	"

"


	 
	
%=8	

!
 
3

6
 	 	
" 

"
6 
 	  
 

 
  	! 	

  

6  	!	 
	  %%

999 E ()7C	D	 "

	%%999E%(8%C	D
 			  
"G



	
 	 
		 
		
 




	 
! 




 


"G 



Case 17-13654-BFK Doc 37 Filed 01/30/18 Entered 01/30/18 17:12:42 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 4
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

	 2 /
	"<
	,9-

	
	
<

#<!


3


HHHHHHHHHHHH

	

 


:
:0	!9		6



4

#9
6
?


0	!9		66
?


;	!09		6
?


2 !	
<94	

6
?


0	
,9	 	
	
.	6
?


.	
926
?



0	


 	 	

 

3

	

	
	

 	"



	

!	6
	
	6 7) 	<		
678%=9

:
:0	!9		6



4

#9
6
?


0	!9		66
?


;	!09		6
?


2 !	
<94	

6
?


0	
,9	 	
	
.	6
?


.	
926
?



0	


	
"


 	
A
B6..5

*8%5	
B	678(

 
		6
	7((78

0 	<	"3B	


%7=8%	
"



78%

;"
677%@7

Jan 30 2018 /s/ Brian F. Kenney

 1/30/2018

Case 17-13654-BFK Doc 37 Filed 01/30/18 Entered 01/30/18 17:12:42 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 4
2 !	
594
!	

(88#9;	
 99+88

	
	677(%+

	 
	!
 	


%(8=85	





/
678%&%

 
 	


%(8=85	





/
678%&%

%)'7)8+%&

Case 17-13654-BFK Doc 37 Filed 01/30/18 Entered 01/30/18 17:12:42 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 4
### §1204. Criminal offenses and penalties

(a) In General.—Any person who violates section 1201 or 1202 willfully and for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain—

(1) shall be fined not more than $500,000 or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both, for the first offense; and

(2) shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both, for any subsequent offense.

(b) Limitation for Nonprofit Library, Archives, Educational Institution, or Public Broadcasting Entity.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to a nonprofit library, archives, educational institution, or public broadcasting entity (as defined under section 118(f)).

(c) Statute of Limitations.—No criminal proceeding shall be brought under this section unless such proceeding is commenced within 5 years after the cause of action arose.

(Added Pub. L. 105–304, title I, §103(a), Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2876; amended Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title V, §5004(b)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–593; Pub. L. 111–295, §6(f)(3), Dec. 9, 2010, 124 Stat. 3181.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–295 substituted "118(f)" for "118(g)".

1999—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 106–113 amended heading and text of subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Subsection (a) shall not apply to a nonprofit library, archives, or educational institution."
#### Abraham Steinam and Others, as Executors, etc., of Max E. Bernheimer, Deceased, Respondents, *v.*William Salomon and Others, Copartners Engaged in Business under the Firm Name and Style of William Salomon & Company, Appellants.

First Department,

December 19, 1913.

See head note in *Isaacs*v. *Salomon {ante,*p. 675).

Appeal by the defendants, William Salomon and others, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 3d day of November, 1913, resettling a prior order denying a motion to strike from the complaint certain allegations as irrelevant, immaterial and redundant, and to make certain other allegations more definite and certain.

*Marvin W. Wynne,*for the appellants.

*Benjamin G. Paskus,*for the respondents.

Scott, J.:

The complaint in this action is, in the main, identical with that in *Isaacs*v. *Salomon*(159 App. Div. 675), decided herewith, and the rulings made in that case are applicable to this. Paragraphs 8 and 9 of the complaint in this action are not contained in the complaint in the other case. They may have some relevancy as showing the relations between the parties immediately before the sale complained of and, therefore, will not be stricken out.

*679The order should be reversed and the motion granted to the extent indicated, without costs to either party.

Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlw and Clarke, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed and motion granted to extent stated in opinion, without costs. Orders to be settled on notice.