alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DEPENDENTS AND SURVIVORS 

PARENTS’ DEPENDENCY AND INDEMNITY COMPENSATION 

Disabilities determined by VA to be related to your military service can lead to monthly non-taxable compensation, enrollment in the 

VA health care system, a 10-point hiring preference for federal employment and other important benefits. Ask your VA 

representative or Veterans Service Organization representative about Disability Compensation, Pension, Health Care, Caregiver 

Program, Career Services, Educational Assistance, Home Loan Guaranty, Insurance and/or Dependents and Survivors’ Benefits.

WHAT IS PARENTS’ DIC? 

Parents’ Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) is a needs-based benefit paid to the 

parent(s) of a military Servicemember or Veteran who dies from:

• a disease or injury incurred or aggravated while on active duty or active duty for training,

OR

• an injury incurred or aggravated in line of duty, or certain diseases incurred while on

inactive duty for training, OR

• a service-connected disability.

WHO ARE ELIGIBLE PARENTS?

The term “parent” includes biological, adoptive, and foster parents.

HOW MUCH DOES VA PAY? 

See the Parents’ DIC rate charts and explanations about how to determine the monthly payment for 

Parents’ DIC.

The amount of benefits VA pays recipients of Parents’ DIC is based on the parent or parents’ 

countable income. When countable income exceeds the limit set by law, no benefit is payable. 

Eligible parents must report all sources of income to VA such as wages, retirement payments, 

insurance proceeds or annuity payment, interest, and dividends.

VA deducts certain expenses paid by you from your annual household income, which will decrease 

your countable income and increase your monthly Parents’ DIC payment. A complete list of these 

exclusions is provided in sections 3.261 and 3.262 of title 38, Code of Federal Regulations. 

HOW CAN YOU APPLY?

You may apply for Parents’ DIC by completing VA Form 21-535, Application for Dependency and 

Indemnity Compensation by Parent(s), and mailing it to the Pension Management Center (PMC) that 

has jurisdiction over your claim. If you do not know which PMC has jurisdiction over your claim, you 
Pension and Fiduciary Service– December 2015 

may submit your application to the VA regional office closest to your current residence. See our 

directory of VA regional offices.
§ 300.714 Establishment of advisory board. ( a ) To meet the requirements of section 612(a)(21) of the Act, the Secretary of the Interior must establish, under the BIA, an advisory board composed of individuals involved in or concerned with the education and provision of services to Indian infants, toddlers, children, and youth with disabilities, including Indians with disabilities, Indian parents or guardians of such children, teachers, service providers, State and local educational officials, representatives of tribes or tribal organizations, representatives from State Interagency Coordinating Councils under section 641 of the Act in States having reservations, and other members representing the various divisions and entities of the BIA. The chairperson must be selected by the Secretary of the Interior.
( b ) The advisory board must— ( 1 ) Assist in the coordination of services within the BIA and with other local, State, and Federal agencies in the provision of education for infants, toddlers, and children with disabilities;
( 2 ) Advise and assist the Secretary of the Interior in the performance of the Secretary of the Interior's responsibilities described in section 611(h) of the Act;
( 3 ) Develop and recommend policies concerning effective inter- and intra-agency collaboration, including modifications to regulations, and the elimination of barriers to inter- and intra-agency programs and activities;
( 4 ) Provide assistance and disseminate information on best practices, effective program coordination strategies, and recommendations for improved early intervention services or educational programming for Indian infants, toddlers, and children with disabilities; and
( 5 ) Provide assistance in the preparation of information required under § 300.708(h).
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1411(h)(6))
### **CHAPTER 12—COPYRIGHT PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS**

Sec.
1201.
Circumvention of copyright protection systems.
1202.
Integrity of copyright management information.
1203.
Civil remedies.
1204.
Criminal offenses and penalties.
1205.
Savings clause.
§ 35.7 Payment of approved claims. ( a ) Upon allowance of his claim, claimant or his duly authorized agent shall sign the voucher for payment, Standard Form 1145, before payment is made.
( b ) When the claimant is represented by an attorney, the voucher for payment (SF 1145) shall designate both the claimant and his attorney as “payees.” The check shall be delivered to the attorney whose address shall appear on the voucher.
### §92. Control; regulations; grants for buildings; rights-of-way; fish and game; removal of trespassers

Mount Rainier National Park shall be under the exclusive control of the Secretary of the Interior, whose duty it shall be to make and publish, as soon as practicable, such rules and regulations as he may deem necessary or proper for the care and management of the same. Such regulations shall provide for the preservation from injury or spoliation of all timber, mineral deposits, natural curiosities, or wonders within said park, and their retention in their natural condition. The Secretary may, in his discretion, grant parcels of ground at such places in said park as shall require the erection of buildings for the accommodation of visitors; all of the proceeds of said leases, and all other revenues that may be derived from any source connected with said park, to be expended under his direction in the management of the same, and the construction of roads and bridle paths therein. And through the lands of the Pacific National Forest adjoining said park rights-of-way are hereby granted, under such restrictions and regulations as the Secretary of the Interior may establish, to any railway or tramway company or companies, through the lands of said Pacific National Forest, and also into said park created by section 91 of this title, for the purpose of building, constructing, and operating a railway, constructing and operating a railway or tramway line or lines, through said lands, also into said park. He shall provide against the wanton destruction of the fish and game found within said park, and against their capture or destruction for the purposes of merchandise or profit. He shall also cause all persons trespassing upon the same after the passage of sections 91, 92, and 93 of this title to be removed therefrom, and generally shall be authorized to take all such measures as shall be necessary to fully carry out the objects and purposes of sections 91, 92 and 93 of this title.

(Mar. 2, 1899, ch. 377, §2, 30 Stat. 994.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

"Pacific National Forest" was substituted for "Pacific Forest Reserve" on authority of act Mar. 4, 1907, ch. 2907, 34 Stat. 1269, which provided that forest reserves shall hereafter be known as national forests.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeals

Repeal of provisions of this section relating to granting rights-of-way to railway or tramway companies for purpose of building and operating a railway or tramway, so far as they relate to lands within Mount Rainier National Park, see section 92a of this title.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          12,041
<SECURITIES>                                       638
<RECEIVABLES>                                  178,887
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (31,207)
<INVENTORY>                                    164,228
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               365,109
<PP&E>                                         364,245
<DEPRECIATION>                               (192,009)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,038,743
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          259,197
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,098
<OTHER-SE>                                     401,923
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,038,743
<SALES>                                        920,118
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               920,118
<CGS>                                          411,114
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  808,158
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,770
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 77,090
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,106
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             45,984
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 30,320
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    76,304
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.60




                                       66

</TABLE>
The Honor able Ann A ldrich, United States District Judge f or the Nor

thern District of * Ohio, sitti ng by

desig nation. NO T REC OM M EN DE D F OR F UL L- TEX T P UB LIC AT ION F ile Nam e: 07a0593n.06 F iled: August 15, 2007 No. 07-5012 UN ITED STA TES C OU RT OF AP P EA LS F OR THE SI XT H C IR CU IT
UNI TED STATES OF AMERI CA, Plaintiff-Appellee , v. AL L EN L ORENZ O GREEN, Def endant- Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEALFROM THE U NI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT FOR THE WES TERN DI STRI CT OF TEN NESSEE

Be fore : KENNEDYand COOK, Circ uit J udg es; and AL DRI CH, District J udg e. *
PER C URI AM. This matter havingcome on f or ora l argument befor e the panel, and counsel havingconce ded that re cent de cisions, Rita v. United States , 127 S
. C t . 2 4 5 6 (2007), a nd United States v. W

ilms ,

_ _ F.3d __, No. 06- 1896, 2007 WL2077367 (6th Cir. J uly 23, 2007) (e valuating Ri ta ), dispense w ith the grounds pre sented by the Appellant f

or re versa l, the court he reby aff irms the de c isi on of the Di str ic t Co ur

t.
# Official Journal L 9/12 J

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 9 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 4812 January 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 9

English edition

Legislation

Volume 4812 January 2005

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission |
| | * | Commission Recommendation of 28 December 2004 complementary to Recommendation 96/129/EC on the European firearms pass (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

Commission

*

Commission Recommendation of 28 December 2004 complementary to Recommendation 96/129/EC on the European firearms pass (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
The Bureau of Land Management is responsible for the stewardship of our public lands. It is committed to manage,

protect, and improve these lands in a manner to serve the needs of the American people for all times. Management is based on the principles of multiple use and sustained yield of our nation’s resources within a framework 

of environmental responsibility and scientific technology. These resources include recreation; rangelands; timber;

minerals; watershed; fish and wildlife; wilderness; air; and scenic, scientific, and cultural values. 

BLM/MT/PL-07/010+1610 
DRAFT 

BUTTE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN 

AND 

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 

BUTTE FIELD OFFICE 

BUTTE, MONTANA 

JUNE 2007
#### § 280.5 Mitigation or remission of fines.

In any case in which mitigation or remission of a fine is authorized by the Immigration and Nationality Act, the party served with Notice of Intention to Fine may apply in writing to the district director or the Associate Commissioner for Examinations, or the Director for the National Fines Office for such mitigation or remission.

[22 FR 9807, Dec. 6, 1957, as amended at 54 FR 18649, May 2, 1989]
#### Diana M. CAMPITELLI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Hillary Galloway DAVIS; John F. Conwell, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-1054.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2002.

Decided May 22, 2002.

Diane M. CampiteUi, AppeUant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Diane M. Campitelli seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying rehef on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See Campitelli v. Davis,*No. CA-01-3739-L (D.Md. Dec. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before *946the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
906 A.2d 941

#### Dan PATRAS v. Christopher Paul SYPHAX.

No. 4,

Sept. Term, 2006.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Sept. 11, 2006.

Victor E. Long (Regan, Zambri *&*Long PLLC, Washington, DC, on brief), for petitioner.

Timothy S. Smith, Greenbelt, for respondent.

Argued before BELL, C.J., RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL, BATTAGLIA and GREENE, JJ.

PER CURIAM

ORDER.

The petition for writ of certiorari in the above-entitled case having been granted and argued, it is this 11th day of September, 2006,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.
#### In the Matter of Charles W. Rice, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Appellant, against Flushing Hospital and Dispensary et al., Respondents.

*690Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
§ 222.23 How are consolidated LEAs treated for the purposes of eligibility and payment under section 7002? ( a ) *Eligibility.* An LEA formed by the consolidation of one or more LEAs is eligible for section 7002 funds, notwithstanding section 222.21(a)(1), if— ( 1 ) The consolidation occurred prior to fiscal year 1995 or after fiscal year 2005; and
( 2 ) At least one of the former LEAs included in the consolidation: ( i ) Was eligible for section 7002 funds in the fiscal year prior to the consolidation; and
( ii ) Currently contains Federal property that meets the requirements of § 222.21(a) within the boundaries of the former LEA or LEAs.
( b ) *Documentation required.* In the first year of application following the consolidation, an LEA that meets the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section must submit evidence that it meets the requirements of paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2)(ii) of this section.
( c ) *Basis for foundation payment.* ( 1 ) The foundation payment for a consolidated district is based on the total section 7002 payment for the last fiscal year for which the former LEA received payment. When more than one former LEA qualifies under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the payments for the last fiscal year for which the former LEAs received payment are added together to calculate the foundation basis.
( 2 ) Consolidated LEAs receive only a foundation payment and do not receive a payment from any remaining funds.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7702(g))
[81 FR 64741, Sept. 20, 2016]
Jarbidge Draft RMP/EIS Maps 

M-33 August 2010 

Map 32. Range Infrastructure in the Saylor Creek HMA 

BLACK MESA

TWIN BUTTE

THOMPSON

GRINDSTONE

DOVE 

SPRINGS

HALLELUJAH

BLUE BUTTE

SAYLOR CREEK/

NORTH THREE ISLAND

ELMORE

COUNTY

OWYHEE

COUNTY

Hammett

King Hill

Glenns

Ferry

0 5 2.5

Miles

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land

Management. The accuracy, reliability, or

completeness of these data for individual use

or aggregate use with other data is not guaranteed.

Saylor Creek Herd Management Area

Allotments

Fences

Water Developments

Pipelines
### §906. Limitation on exclusive rights: reverse engineering; first sale

(a) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 905, it is not an infringement of the exclusive rights of the owner of a mask work for—

(1) a person to reproduce the mask work solely for the purpose of teaching, analyzing, or evaluating the concepts or techniques embodied in the mask work or the circuitry, logic flow, or organization of components used in the mask work; or

(2) a person who performs the analysis or evaluation described in paragraph (1) to incorporate the results of such conduct in an original mask work which is made to be distributed.

(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 905(2), the owner of a particular semiconductor chip product made by the owner of the mask work, or by any person authorized by the owner of the mask work, may import, distribute, or otherwise dispose of or use, but not reproduce, that particular semiconductor chip product without the authority of the owner of the mask work.

(Added Pub. L. 98–620, title III, §302, Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3350.)
#### § 371.3 What types of projects are authorized under this program?

The American Indian Vocational Rehabilitation Services program provides financial assistance for the establishment and operation of tribal vocational rehabilitation services programs for American Indians with disabilities who reside on or near Federal or State reservations.

(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 121(a) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended Act, 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 741(a))
### §909. Mask work notice

(a) The owner of a mask work provided protection under this chapter may affix notice to the mask work, and to masks and semiconductor chip products embodying the mask work, in such manner and location as to give reasonable notice of such protection. The Register of Copyrights shall prescribe by regulation, as examples, specific methods of affixation and positions of notice for purposes of this section, but these specifications shall not be considered exhaustive. The affixation of such notice is not a condition of protection under this chapter, but shall constitute prima facie evidence of notice of protection.

(b) The notice referred to in subsection (a) shall consist of—

(1) the words "mask work", the symbol *M*, or the symbol (M) (the letter M in a circle); and

(2) the name of the owner or owners of the mask work or an abbreviation by which the name is recognized or is generally known.

(Added Pub. L. 98–620, title III, §302, Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3352; amended Pub. L. 105–80, §12(a)(22), Nov. 13, 1997, 111 Stat. 1535.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1997—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 105–80 substituted " 'mask work', the symbol" for " 'mask force', the sumbol".
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Manouch Moshayedi, Chief Executive Officer of SimpleTech, Inc. (the Company), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report of
the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|/s/ MANOUCH MOSHAYEDI                    
|Manouch Moshayedi Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2006
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tricia A. Ring, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 741]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Ronald H. Tills, A.J.), rendered April 15, 2005. The judgment convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of attempted arson in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed *(see People v Hidalgo,*91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present—Hurlbutt, A.PJ., Scudder, Gorski, Centra and Green, JJ.
§ 1200.160 Communications. ( a ) The agency shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The agency shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford an individual with handicaps an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the agency. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the agency shall give primary consideration to the requests of the individual with handicaps.
( ii ) The agency need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where the agency communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, telecommunication devices for deaf persons (TDD's) or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used to communicate with persons with impaired hearing.
( b ) The agency shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The agency shall provide signage at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the agency to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens. In those circumstances where agency personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the agency has the burden of proving that compliance with § 1200.160 would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the agency head or his or her designee after considering all agency resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the agency shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with handicaps receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.