alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10861

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DEREK ERNEST AUSTIN

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:05-CR-1-ALL

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Derek Ernest Austin appeals the 120-month sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction for being a felon in possession of ammunition. He

argues that his sentence is unconstitutional in light of United States v. Booker,

543 U.S. 220 (2005), because it was based on facts not presented to a jury and

to which he did not admit. The Government seeks to enforce the appeal waiver

provision in Austin’s plea agreement and moves for summary affirmance or

dismissal. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 24, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 06-10861

2

Austin’s appeal waiver was knowing and voluntary, and therefore, the

waiver is enforced. See UnitedStates v. Melancon, 972F.2d 566, 567-68 (5th Cir.

1992). Moreover, Austin’s argument does not come within one of the

enumerated exceptions to his appeal waiver. As such, we do not address the

merits of Austin’s challenge to his sentence. 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government’s

motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED. The Government’s motion to

dismiss is DENIED. The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of

time is DENIED as moot.
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

In re:

BOBBIE UPASNA VARDAN, CHAPTER 11

DEBTOR. CASE NO. 17-13848-KHK

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. AS 

SERVICING AGENT FOR BANK OF 

AMERICA, N.A.,

MOVANT,

vs.

BOBBIE UPASNA VARDAN,

RESPONDENTS.

 ORDER GRANTING IN REM RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY

Upon consideration of the Motion for In Rem Relief from the Automatic Stay filed by Bank

of America, N.A. (aMovanto), upon the argument of counsel and the Court finding grounds to grant

the Motion; it is 

ORDERED that the automatic stay of 11 U.S.C. §362(a) is hereby modified In Rem as to all

parties to permit the Movant and its successors and assigns to enforce the lien of its Deed of Trust

as it pertains to the real property located at 3409 Meyer Woods Lane, Fairfax, VA 22033 and

more particularly described as follows:

Lot 10, THOMPSON ROAD PROPERTY, (OAK HILL RESERVE

II), as the same appears duly dedicated, platted and recorded

in Deed Book 16579 at Page 1676, among the land records of

Fairfax County, Virginia.

In Rem Relief shall extend to the purchaser at the foreclosure sale to allow the purchaser to

take such action under state law, as may be necessary, to obtain possession of the property.

DATED: 



UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

	






			

	 !"#$

%$&#'
(

"&&

()*"!"!&

+$&#,"-&.#"-&

/	#!%"&

May 30 2018 /s/ Klinette Kindred

Entered on Docket:May 31 2018

Case 17-13848-KHK Doc 93 Filed 05/31/18 Entered 05/31/18 09:36:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 5
NOTICE OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER

Entered on Docket



I ask for this:

By: /s/JOHNIE R. MUNCY

Eric D. White, Esquire, Bar No. 21346

Brandon R. Jordan, Esquire, Bar No. 72170

Johnie R. Muncy, Esquire, Bar No. 73248

Nisha R. Patel, Esquire, Bar No. 83302

Samuel I. White, P.C.

1804 Staples Mill Road

Suite 200

Richmond, VA 23230

Tel.: (804) 290-4290

Fax: (804) 290-4298

jmuncy@siwpc.com

Counsel for Bank of America, N.A.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that this proposed Order is substantially in compliance with Standing Order

Number 10-2 and that it has been endorsed by all necessary parties involved in this proceeding.

By: /s/JOHNIE R. MUNCY

Johnie R. Muncy, Esquire

Samuel I. White, P.C.

The Clerk shall mail a copy of the entered Order to the following and to the 20 largest unsecured

creditors on the Debtor's mailing matrix, as listed on the attached mailing list:

Bobbie U. Vardan

Counsel for Debtor

P.O. Box 25

Great Falls, VA 22066

Bobbie Upasna Vardan

Pro Se Debtor

855 Nicholas Run Drive

Great Falls, VA 22066

Case 17-13848-KHK Doc 93 Filed 05/31/18 Entered 05/31/18 09:36:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 5
Case 17-13848-KHK Doc 93 Filed 05/31/18 Entered 05/31/18 09:36:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 5
Case 17-13848-KHK Doc 93 Filed 05/31/18 Entered 05/31/18 09:36:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 5
Case 17-13848-KHK Doc 93 Filed 05/31/18 Entered 05/31/18 09:36:56 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 5
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>

This filing contains summary financial information extracted from the
current year' Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such Form 10-K
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                               779
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                          35
<MORTGAGE>                                         375
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                    1285
<CASH>                                               1
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                             102
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1424
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                    682
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                 27
<POLICY-OTHER>                                      13
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                               75
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                         543
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1424
<PREMIUMS>                                         118
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                 89
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   7
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                          95
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                         17
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                38
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     64
<INCOME-TAX>                                        22
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 42
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        42
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.46
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 143A/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.143.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 143A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 532 June 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.143.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 143A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 532 June 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2010/C 143A/01 | Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AST/71/08 — Assistants (AST 3) in the field of publications production — Proofreaders with Lithuanian (LT) as their main language | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2010/C 143A/01

Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AST/71/08 — Assistants (AST 3) in the field of publications production — Proofreaders with Lithuanian (LT) as their main language

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | (FR) |
| --- | --- |
| 9 | |
| 19 | (FR) |
| 23 | (DE/ES/PT) |
| 28 | |
| 48 | |
| 53 | |
| 56 | |
| 57 | |
| 60 | |
| 61 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 62 | |
| 64 | |
| 66 | (BG/RO) |
| 67 | (ES) |
| 70 | (PT) |
| 73 | (FI) |
| 74 | (SV) |
| 91 | |
| 95 | |
| 104 | |
| 110 | |
| 116 | (ET) |
| 119 | |
| 129 | (EL) |
| 137 | (LT/LV/MT) |
| 138 | (BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK) |
| 143 | (DE/EN/FR) |

5

(FR)

9

19

(FR)

23

(DE/ES/PT)

28

48

53

56

57

60

61

(DE/EN/FR)

62

64

66

(BG/RO)

67

(ES)

70

(PT)

73

(FI)

74

(SV)

91

95

104

110

116

(ET)

119

129

(EL)

137

(LT/LV/MT)

138

(BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK)

143

(DE/EN/FR)

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-11074

BILLY J MULLINS JR; FARAWAY ENTERPRISES

Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees

v.

TESTAMERICA INC; SAGAPONACK PARTNERS LP

Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:02-CV-106

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In view of this court’s decision to vacate the district court’s judgment on

Plaintiff Faraway Enterprises’ breach of contract and other claims, see Mullins

v. TestAmerica Inc., No. 08-11224, --- F.3d ----, 2009 WL 807458, at *30 (5th Cir.

Mar. 30, 2009), the district court’s memorandum opinion and order on attorney’s

fees entered on October 8, 2008 is hereby vacated. This case is remanded to the

district court for such further proceedings as may be appropriate. Each party

shall bear its own costs.

VACATED and REMANDED. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 27, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
§ 315.3 Evidence. ( a ) The records of the Selective Service System and the military department under which the alien served shall be conclusive evidence of whether the alien was relieved or discharged from liability for military service because he or she was an alien.
( b ) The regulations of the Selective Service Administration and its predecessors will be controlling with respect to the requirement to register for, and liability for, service in the Armed Forces of the United States.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNASA's Involvement in Technology Development and Transfer: The Ohio Hybrid Bus ProjectA government and industry cooperative is using advanced power technology in a city transit bus that will offer double the fuel economy, and reduce emissions to one tenth of government standards. The heart of the vehicle's power system is a natural gas fueled generator unit. Power from both the generator and an advanced energy storage system is provided to a variable speed electric motor attached to the rear drive axle. A unique aspect of the vehicle's design is its use of "super" capacitors for recovery of energy during braking. This is the largest vehicle ever built using this advanced energy recovery technology. This paper describes the project goals and approach, results of its system performance modeling, and the status of the development team's effort.Document ID19970034986Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsViterna, Larry A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1997Subject CategoryUrban Technology And TransportationReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:107540NASA-TM-107540E-10863Meeting InformationMeeting: Electrical Insulation Conference/Electrical Manufacturing and Coil Winding Expo 1997Location: Chicago, ILCountry: United StatesStart Date: September 22, 1997End Date: September 25, 1997Sponsors:National Electrical Mfrs. Association,Electrical Mfg. and Coil Winding Association, Inc.,Institute of Electrical and Electronics EngineersAccession Number97N30202Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 243-30-07Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970034986.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Angela Carter v. Tarantino Properties, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01

- 17

- 00843

- CV

Trial court case number: 2015

- 57423

Trial court: 215th District Court of Harris County

The record was due on December 18, 2017. On January 8, 2018, the court reporter advised this court that no reporter’s record was taken. On January 24, 2018, the district clerk advised this court that appellant had not made payment arrangemen ts for the filing of the clerk’s

record.

On November 13, 2017, appellant filed in this court a statement of inability to afford costs on appeal. Appellant stated in the cover letter that she had filed this document in the trial court; but because we are u nable to verify that the trial court received this document.

Accordingly, if appellant wishes to proceed without payment of costs or fees for preparation of the appellate record, she must comply with Rule 145(b) of the rules of civil procedure . Appellant m ust file her Statement of Inability in compliance with Rule 145 in the trial court. Appellant also must ask the trial court clerk to prepare and file a supplemental clerk’s

record within 14 days of the date of this order , containing the Statement of Inabil ity appellant

filed with the trial court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 3 4.5 ( c )

. If appellant fails to comply with this order, t he case may be dismissed for failure to make arrangements for the filing of the clerk’s record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault)

.
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

__

/s/ Michael Massengale

_  Acting individually

Date: _ February 22, 2018

_
§ 106.38 Employment assistance to students. ( a ) *Assistance by recipient in making available outside employment.* A recipient which assists any agency, organization or person in making employment available to any of its students: ( 1 ) Shall assure itself that such employment is made available without discrimination on the basis of sex; and
( 2 ) Shall not render such services to any agency, organization, or person which discriminates on the basis of sex in its employment practices.
( b ) *Employment of students by recipients.* A recipient which employs any of its students shall not do so in a manner which violates subpart E of this part.
[45 FR 30955, May 9, 1980, as amended at 85 FR 30579, May 19, 2020]
#### § 342.9 Notice re 18 U.S.C. 1428.

The notice to surrender a cancelled certificate of citizenship or copy thereof, prescribed by section 1428 of Title 18 of the United States Code, shall be given by the district director in whose district the person who has possession or control of such document resides.

[28 FR 9282, Aug. 23, 1963]
#### § 246.3 Allegations contested or denied; hearing requested.

If, within the prescribed time following service of the notice pursuant to § 246.1, the respondent has filed an answer which contests or denies any allegation in the notice, or a hearing is requested, a hearing pursuant to § 246.5 shall be conducted by an immigration judge, and the requirements contained in §§ 240.3, 240.4, 240.5, 240.6, 240.7, and 240.9 of this chapter shall be followed.
#### Alfred W. Eickhoff, Respondent, v. Edmund Elwin Hart, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                        5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                   319,800
<OTHER-SE>                               (319,800)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     0
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     0
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.02


</TABLE>
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00366

- CR

Roger Eugene Fain

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 372nd District Court

o f Tarrant C ounty (1023944D )

December 4, 2014

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was error in the trial court’s order . It is ordered that the order of the trial

court is affirmed in part and reversed in part. We affirm the trial court’s order as

to the blood on the B ic pen and in the closet. We reverse the trial court’s order

as to the hairs in Donahew’s hands, the pubic ha ir, blood on the bathroom faucet,

Donahew’s fingernail clippings, male DNA discovered on the bra and shirt

Donahew wore on the day of her death, and the knife. We remand this case to

the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion

.

S ECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

__ /s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot

_____________ Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
# Official Journal L 155/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 155 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6212 June 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 155

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6212 June 2019

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DIRECTIVES |
| | * | Directive (EU) 2019/904 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

DIRECTIVES

*

Directive (EU) 2019/904 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
§ 310.4 Judicial naturalization authority and withdrawal of petitions. ( a ) *Jurisdiction.* No court shall have jurisdiction under section 310(a) of the Act, to naturalize a person unless a petition for naturalization with respect to that person was filed with the naturalization court before October 1, 1991.
( b ) *Withdrawal of petitions.* ( 1 ) In the case of any petition for naturalization which was pending in any court as of November 29, 1990, the petitioner may elect to withdraw such petition, and have the application for naturalization considered under the administrative naturalization process. Such petition must be withdrawn after October 1, 1991, but not later than December 31, 1991.
( 2 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the petitioner shall not be permitted to withdraw his or her petition for naturalization, unless the Attorney General consents to the withdrawal.
( c ) *Judicial proceedings.* ( 1 ) All pending petitions not withdrawn in the manner and terms described in paragraph (b) of this section, shall be decided, on the merits, by the naturalization court, in conformity with the applicable provisions of the judicial naturalization authority of the prior statute. The reviewing court shall enter a final order.
( 2 ) In cases where the petitioner fails to prosecute his or her petition, the court shall decide the petition upon its merits unless the Attorney General moves that the petition be dismissed for lack of prosecution.