alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-19-00386-CV 

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF 

DAVID MICHAEL NATHANSON AND CARRIE DENISE NATHANSON 

 

On Appeal from the 200th District Court 

Travis County, Texas1 

Trial Court No. D-1-FM-18-002148, Honorable James Lee Carroll, Presiding 

 

November 20, 2019 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ. 

Appellant David Michael Nathanson attempts to appeal a final decree of divorce 

dissolving his marriage to appellee Carrie Denise Nathanson. We dismiss the appeal

because David failed to pay the requisite filing fee and for want of jurisdiction.

By letter of October 24, 2019, we notified David that the filing fee was overdue and

advised him that unless he was excused from paying court costs, failure to pay the filing 

fee by November 4 would result in dismissal of the appeal. To date, David has not paid 

1 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the 

Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 

2013).
2

the filing fee or sought leave to proceed without payment of costs. TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1. 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed because of David’s failure to comply with a 

requirement of the appellate rules. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

Further, now pending before this Court is Carrie’s motion to dismiss the appeal for 

want of jurisdiction. In her motion, she asserts that David filed his notice of appeal 

untimely. The trial court signed the divorce decree on May 10, 2019. David timely filed 

a motion for new trial. Accordingly, his notice of appeal was due within ninety days after 

the divorce decree was signed, by August 8, 2019. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). David filed 

a notice of appeal on October 7, 2019. He has not filed a response to Carrie’s motion to 

dismiss. Because a timely-filed notice of appeal is required to invoke this Court’s 

appellate jurisdiction, we grant Carrie’s motion and dismiss the appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), (c).

Per Curiam
EX-32.2

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
         ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
of Atlantic Security, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the
"Report"), I, Gregory Chan, Principal Financial Officer of Atlantic Security,
Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Atlantic Security, Inc.


November 9, 2004

                                        /s/ Gregory Chan
                                        --------------------------
                                             Gregory Chan
                                             Principal Financial Officer
June 2, 2016

In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 2nd day of June, 2016.

10-16-00019-CV	AMERICAN LUMBER, INC. v. EAGLE FOREST PRODUCTS, LLC (IDAHO), EAGLE FOREST PRODUCTS, LLC (TEXAS), BRAD BOWER, EDDIE WINN AND ANDREW KEYS - ON APPEAL FROM THE 85TH DISTRICT COURT OF BRAZOS COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO. 13-002584-CV-85 – DISMISSED - Memorandum Opinion by Justice Scoggins:

“This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellant to dismiss appeal, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of the Court said motion should be granted; it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that said motion be, and hereby is, granted.  It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the appeal be, and hereby is, dismissed.  It is further ordered that costs in this behalf expended are assessed against the party incurring the same and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
# **Hercules Incorporated**

# **EXHIBIT 31.2**

# **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

## **SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Fred G. Aanonsen, Vice President and Controller, certify that:

1.         I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Hercules Incorporated;

2.         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.         The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.         The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditorsand the audit committee of registrant's board of directors:

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date:  March 15, 2004

/s/ Fred G. Aanonsen

Fred G. Aanonsen

Vice President and Controller
DEPARTMENT OFTRAcNSPORTATlON

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

14910-I3-PI

sn'"H~srlS

IlOlJl1S(, SYMIJOI

...-l ,.~ - _

IDocket No. FAA-2009-0785; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-125-AD; Amendmen ti~!OOLJPl

11(;'" ~/'r.~.'".- .-:~

39>*; AD **) ~v v - C - - IV "i'tlf ...•1G

j '/>.~£Ie)

RlN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-400 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

(DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness djrective (AD) for the

products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airwOlthiness

infoll11ation (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify

IIDUTI ,,..,OOl

IS'l'","",'lo

and con"eet an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the w1safe L>An

condition as:

There has been one case reported of failure ofa shaft (tailstock) on an

elevator Power Control Unit (PCU), Part Number (PIN) 390600-1007.

Continued actuation of the affected PCU caused damage to the

surrounding structure. * * *

Each elevator surface has three PCUs, powered by separate independent

hydraulic systems, and a single elevator peu shaft failure may remain

dom1anL Such a dormant loss of redundancy, coupled with the potential

for a failed shaft to produce collateral damage, including damage to

hydraulic lines, could possibly affect the controllability of the aircraft.

"'" TlNG ,"'.mOL

* * * * * * *
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14910-13-PI

ANE-17J

C. Gomez

J 4 CFR Part 39 OAr"

II/ci 109

IDocket No. FAA-2009-0785; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-125-ADj Amendment ~~'~~~';'~Q

39_'*; AD **]

HIN 2120-AA64

Ainvorthincss Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-400 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

(DOT)

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airwot1hincss directive (AD) fur the

products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness

information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify

ClnJ correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe

condition as:

There has been one case repol1cd of failLll'c of a shaft (tailstock) on an

elevator Power Control Unit (peV), Part Number (pIN) 390600-1007.

Continued actuation oftbe affected peu caused damage to tbe

surrounding structure. *' '" *

Each elevator surface has three peus, powered by separate independent

hydraulic systems, and a single elevator pev shaft failure may remain

dormant. Such a dormant loss of redundancy, coupled with the potential

for a failed shaft to produce collateral damage, including damage to

hydraulic lines, could possibly affect the controllability of the aircraft.

i\NE-170

LGB/AEG

'N''''''u;r,;,(; s.c..... .,J

J. McManaman

V crr~'''''''''·

UAn;

,lot 07

OATf.

* •

, , , ,
§ 328.2 Eligibility. To be eligible for naturalization under section 328(a) of the Act, an applicant must establish that the applicant: ( a ) Has served honorably in and, if separated, has been separated honorably from, the Armed Forces of the United States;
( b ) Has served under paragraph (a) of this section for a period of 1 or more years, whether that service is continuous or discontinuous;
( c ) Is a lawful permanent resident of the United States at the time of the examination on the application;
( d ) Has been, during any period within five years preceding the filing of the application for naturalization, or the examination on the application if eligible for early filing under section 334(a) of the Act, and continues to be, of good moral character, attached to the principles of the Constitution of the United States, and favorably disposed toward the good order and happiness of the United States. ( 1 ) An applicant is presumed to satisfy the requirements of this paragraph during periods of honorable service under paragraph (a) of this section.
( 2 ) An applicant must establish that he or she satisfies the requirements of this paragraph from the date of discharge from military until the date of admission to citizenship.
( 3 ) An applicant whose honorable service is discontinuous must also demonstrate that he or she satisfies the requirements of this paragraph for those periods of time when that applicant is not in honorable service.
( e ) Has complied with all other requirements for naturalization as provided in part 316 of this chapter, except that: ( 1 ) An applicant who files an application for naturalization while still in honorable service, or within six months after termination of such service, is generally not required to satisfy the residence requirements under § 316.2(a)(3) through (a)(6) of this chapter; however, if the applicant's military service is discontinuous, that applicant must establish, for periods between honorable service during the five years immediately preceding the date of filing the application, or the examination on the application if eligible for early filing under section 334(a) of the Act, that he or she resided in the United States and in the State or Service district in the United States in which the application is filed.
( 2 ) An applicant who files an application for naturalization more than six months after terminating honorable service must satisfy the residence requirements under § 316.2(a)(3) through (a)(6) of this chapter. However, any honorable service by the applicant within the five years immediately preceding the date of filing of the application shall be considered as residence within the United States for purposes of § 316.2(a)(3) of this chapter.
[56 FR 50492, Oct. 7, 1991, as amended at 75 FR 2787, Jan. 19, 2010]
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 70780 / October 30, 2013

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-15507

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

 :

JPMorgan Chase & Co., : EXTENSION ORDER

:

Respondent. :

____________________________________:

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested an extension of time, until 

May 19, 2014, to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution under Rule 1101(a) of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans.

On September 19, 2013, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist 

Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making 

Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”) against JPMorgan Chase & Co. 

(“JPMorgan”).1 The Order required JPMorgan to pay a civil money penalty in the amount of 

$200,000,000 to the Commission and ordered that such penalty may be distributed pursuant to 

Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended. 

In its request for an extension of time, the Division stated that it required additional 

time because of the highly complex nature of the case. The Division noted that it must retain a 

damages expert and afford the expert time to determine who the injured investors are and the 

extent of their damages, in order to develop a plan of allocation. After the plan of allocation is 

developed, a plan of distribution must be written. 

 1 See Exchange Act Rel. 70458 (Sep. 19, 2013).
2

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s 

request for an extension of time, until May 19, 2014, to submit a Proposed Plan of 

Distribution is granted.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority. 

Elizabeth M. Murphy

Secretary
### §90e–2. Map and legal description, filing with Congressional committees; correction of errors; applicability of Wilderness Act

(a) As soon as practicable after October 2, 1968, the Secretary of Agriculture shall file a map and legal description of the Pasayten Wilderness and of the Glacier Peak Wilderness, as hereby modified, with the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives, and such descriptions shall have the same force and effect as if included in this subchapter: Provided, however, That correction of clerical or typographical errors in such legal descriptions and maps may be made.

(b) Upon the filing of the legal descriptions and maps as provided for in subsection (a) of this section the Pasayten Wilderness and the additions to the Glacier Peak Wilderness shall be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture in accordance with the provisions of the Wilderness Act [16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.] and thereafter shall be subject to the provisions of the Wilderness Act governing areas designated by that Act as wilderness areas, except that any reference in such provisions to the effective date of the Wilderness Act shall be deemed to be a reference to the effective date of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 90–544, title VI, §603, Oct. 2, 1968, 82 Stat. 930; Pub. L. 103–437, §6(e), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4585.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Wilderness Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is Pub. L. 88–577, Sept. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 890, which is classified generally to chapter 23 (§1131 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1131 of this title and Tables.

Effective date of the Wilderness Act, referred to in subsec. (b), means the date of enactment, Sept. 3, 1964, of such Act.

Effective date of this subchapter, referred to in subsec. (b), means the date of enactment, Oct. 2, 1968, of this subchapter.

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–437 substituted "Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives" for "Interior and Insular Affairs Committees of the United States Senate and House of Representatives".
!P

!P

!P

!P !P

!P !P!P!P

!P

!P

!P

!P

!P !P!P

!P

!P!P

!P

!P

!P

y Pear Cree

u lch

Cr e e k

Bould e r Ri ver 

De ep Creek 

Camp

Cr e e k 

Fish Cre e k 

Mill Creek 

Lost Cr e e k 

S i xte en M il e Creek 

Middl e Creek 

Wil lo w 

C r e ek 

Jefferson River 

M isso uri iver 

Clark

Fork

Ri v

er 

Dry C r eek 

Pric k l 

East Gallatin River 

Bison Creek 

Browns Gulch 

P intler Creek 

S i l v

w Cr e e k 

Lump G 

W arm Springs Creek 

Wise 

Brid g er

Seymour Cree k 

Boz eman Creek 

White tail Creek 

Mad ison River 

Littl e Pipestone Creek 

Gallatin River 

Moose

D

C reek 

ivid e Creek 

R i v e r 

Fishtrap Creek

Big Ho

R i v e r 

Warm

Sprin gs Creek 

Crow Cre ek 

g:\blm\buttermp\ams\FinalFigures\fig2-22_WCT_Dist_Gen11x17.mxd 

!P P!
 !P Canyon Ferry

Reservoi Je!P!P!Pfferson Coun r ty !P !P 

!P !P !P

!P !P!P !P !P § ̈¦15 !P

!P !P 

! ter County !

P P !P

!P !P 

£¤12

!P 

!P !P !P !P !P !P!P !P 

!P !P 

!P !P

BOULDER

10020006
 

!P Boulder 

!P 

Broadwa

Townsend

R

!P 

Georgetow

Lake !P 

P! Anaconda 

!P 

!P !P

!P

!P !P !P !P

!P § ̈¦90 !P

!P Deerlodge County

UPPER CLARK FORK

17010201 !P !P 

£¤287

JEFFERSO

10020005
 

!P !P Butte e

!P r Bo !P !P 

!P 

!P 

P!!P Silverbow County BIG HOLE

10020004 l Gallatin County !P e 

§ ̈¦15

JEFFERSO

10020005

!P Whitehall !P

!P !P Three Forks

!P !P 

grade 

!P 

P! !P !P !P 

10020008 GALLATIN 

!P Bel

!P !P 

!P 

!P Bozeman 

!P !P !P !P !P 

!P !P

!P !P

!P 

!P !P

!P !P !P 

!P 

Ma

Location 

P ! !P !P !P

!P !P 

!P 

I Butte Field Office / HUC Tested; Unaltered Suspected unaltered

Planning Area Boundary Westslope Cutthroat Trout Tested; <= 10% introgression Potentially altered Distribution of Genetic Introgression Rivers and Streams Tested; >10% and <= 25% introgression Mixed stock; altered and unaltered BLM, Butte Field Office 0 Miles 10 Map ! Known Migration Barrier P Butte RMP and EIS

Bureau of Land Tested; >25% introgression No warranty is made by the Bureau of Location FIGURE 2-22b Land Management (BLM) for use of Management (BLM) Lands data for purposes not intended by BLM.
### §698k. Contracts for providing visitor services in Big Cypress Preserve and Addition; right of first refusal to Miccosukee and Seminole Tribes

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, before entering into any contract for the provision of revenue producing visitor services,

(i) the Secretary shall offer those members of the Miccosukee and Seminole Indian Tribes who, on January 1, 1972 (January 1, 1985, in the case of the Addition), were engaged in the provision of similar services, a right of first refusal to continue providing such services within the preserve and the Addition subject to such terms and conditions as he may deem appropriate, and

(ii) before entering into any contract or agreement to provide new revenue-producing visitor services within the preserve or within the Addition, the Secretary shall offer to the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida and the Seminole Tribe of Florida the right of first refusal to provide such services, the right to be open for a period of ninety days. Should both Tribes respond with proposals that satisfy the terms and conditions established by the Secretary, the Secretary may allow the Tribes an additional period of ninety days in which to enter into an inter-Tribal cooperative agreement to provide such visitor services, but if neither tribe responds with proposals that satisfy the terms and conditions established by the Secretary, then the Secretary shall provide such visitor services in accordance with subchapter IV of chapter 1 of this title. No such agreement may be assigned or otherwise transferred without the consent of the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 93–440, §6, Oct. 11, 1974, 88 Stat. 1260; Pub. L. 100–301, §3(d), Apr. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 444.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–301 in cl. (i) inserted "(January 1, 1985, in the case of the Addition)" after "1972" and "and the Addition" after "preserve", and in cl. (ii) inserted "or within the Addition" after "preserve".
#### Amelia M. Abrams v. Alexander Abrams.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
### **CHAPTER 79—PERJURY**

Sec.
1621.
Perjury generally.
1622.
Subornation of perjury.
1623.
False declarations before grand jury or court.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1970**—Pub. L. 91–452, title IV, §401(b), Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 933, added item 1623.
• > o n rnmMENTO i 

# mmm m RECEIVE D MA R ^ 3 20t l
Federa l Aviatio n Adminislratio n Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbur Wrigh t Buildin g - Suite 2WiOO

O 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Washington , D C 2059 1

FAA Cas e No
. 2009NM07009 2

T N TH E MATTERO FFLYIN G B AVIATION , LL C

REQUES T FO RHEARIN G Flyin g B Aviation , LLC , b y it s undersigne dcounsel , pursuan t t o Sectio n 13.1 6 o f th e Federa l Aviatio n Regulation s (1 4 CFR13.16) , andhavin g receive do n Februar y 18 , 2011 , aFina l Notic e o f

Propose dCivi l Penalty , hereb y make s thi s REQUES T FO R HEARIN G i n th e above-reference dcase . Respectfull y submitte dthi s / ^ da y o f February , 2011
.

RirfiardA
. ijl^'^^

- AtioTne y toTSS D 381 5 Rickeftbacke

r St. , Suite 20 8 Boise , Idah o 8370 5 (208 ) 344- ) 38 4 Phon e (208)344-512 1 Fax


# ORIGINA L REQUES T FO RHEARIN G - 1
200/lOOi a SW Q •! • VV d SlJLSSetSO S XV d S3:i7 L UOS/iL/G OCERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E
I hereb y certif

y tha t 1 hav e thi s date mailed , by regular mail , a n original o f

th e foregoin g Reques t

for Hearin g addresse dto : Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Washington , D C 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W100 0 And , further , tha

t I hav e tlii s dat e mailed , b y regula r mail , acop y o f

th e foregoin g Respondent' s Notic e o f

Appeal addresse dto : Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Offic e o f Regiona l Counse l - ANM- 7 Northwes t

Mountai n Regio n 160 1 Lin dAvenue , S W Ronton , W

A 9805 7
Date dthi s ^^ ^ day o f

February , 2011
.

REQUES T FO RHEARIN G - 2
200/300 0 SW O < - VV dStLSSGtSO S XV J es:i? L UOS/iL/S O