alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 492 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to provide that an owner or 

operator of a social media service that hinders the display of usergenerated content shall be treated as a publisher or speaker of such 

content, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 11, 2019 

Mr. GOHMERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to provide that 

an owner or operator of a social media service that 

hinders the display of user-generated content shall be 

treated as a publisher or speaker of such content, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Biased Algorithm De5 terrence Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 492 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO PROTECTION FROM TREATMENT AS 

2 PUBLISHER OR SPEAKER. 

3 Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 

4 U.S.C. 230) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (c), by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(3) EXCEPTION.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding para9 graph (1), an owner or operator of a social 

10 media service that displays user-generated con11 tent in an order other than chronological order, 

12 delays the display of such content relative to 

13 other content, or otherwise hinders the display 

14 of such content relative to other content, if for 

15 a reason other than to restrict access to or 

16 availability of material described in paragraph 

17 (2)(A) or to carry out the direction of the user 

18 that generated such content, shall be treated as 

19 a publisher or speaker of such content. 

20 ‘‘(B) USE OF ALGORITHMS.—If an algo21 rithm of a social media service is used to en22 gage in an action related to user-generated con23 tent that is described in subparagraph (A), 

24 such action shall be considered to be the action 

25 of the owner or operator of the social media 

26 service.’’; and 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 492 IH

1 (2) in subsection (f), by adding at the end the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(5) SOCIAL MEDIA SERVICE.—The term ‘social 

4 media service’ means any interactive computer serv5 ice provided over the internet that connects users for 

6 the purpose of such users engaging in dialogue, 

7 sharing information, collaborating, or otherwise 

8 interacting. 

9 ‘‘(6) USER-GENERATED CONTENT.—The term 

10 ‘user-generated content’ means content that is sup11 plied on a social media service by an information 

12 content provider who is a user of such service. 

13 ‘‘(7) ALGORITHM.—The term ‘algorithm’ means 

14 a computer program that performs any action de15 scribed in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of para16 graph (4).’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
### §79–1. Yosemite National Park; expansion of reservoir capacity

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Federal lands may be used for the expansion of the capacity of any reservoir which is located within the boundaries of Yosemite National Park unless Congress enacts specific statutory authorization after October 31, 1988, for such expansion.

(Pub. L. 100–563, §6, Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2830.)
### §1597. Unlawful conduct with respect to immigration documents

(a) Destruction, Concealment, Removal, Confiscation, or Possession of Immigration Documents.—It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly destroy, conceal, remove, confiscate, or possess, an actual or purported passport or other immigration document of another individual—

(1) in the course of violating section 1351 of this title or section 274 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1324);

(2) with intent to violate section 1351 of this title or section 274 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1324); or

(3) in order to, without lawful authority, maintain, prevent, or restrict the labor of services of the individual.

(b) Penalty.—Any person who violates subsection (a) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for not more than 1 year, or both.

(c) Obstruction.—Any person who knowingly obstructs, attempts to obstruct, or in any way interferes with or prevents the enforcement of this section, shall be subject to the penalties described in subsection (b).

(Added Pub. L. 113–4, title XII, §1211(c)(1), Mar. 7, 2013, 127 Stat. 142.)
### §470aaa–7. Rewards and forfeiture

#### (a) Rewards

The Secretary may pay from penalties collected under section 470aaa–5 or 470aaa–6 of this title or from appropriated funds—

(1) consistent with amounts established in regulations by the Secretary; or

(2) if no such regulation exists, an amount up to 1⁄2 of the penalties, to any person who furnishes information which leads to the finding of a civil violation, or the conviction of criminal violation, with respect to which the penalty was paid. If several persons provided the information, the amount shall be divided among the persons. No officer or employee of the United States or of any State or local government who furnishes information or renders service in the performance of his official duties shall be eligible for payment under this subsection.

#### (b) Forfeiture

All paleontological resources with respect to which a violation under section 470aaa–5 or 470aaa–6 of this title occurred and which are in the possession of any person, shall be subject to civil forfeiture, or upon conviction, to criminal forfeiture.

#### (c) Transfer of seized resources

The Secretary may transfer administration of seized paleontological resources to Federal or non-Federal educational institutions to be used for scientific or educational purposes.

(Pub. L. 111–11, title VI, §6308, Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1176.)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 81571 / September 11, 2017

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-15654

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

 :

G-TRADE SERVICES LLC, : ORDER DIRECTING FOURTH

CONVERGEX GLOBAL MARKETS : DISBURSEMENT OF FAIR FUND

LIMITED, and CONVERGEX :

EXECUTION SOLUTIONS LLC :

:

Respondents. :

____________________________________:

On July 24, 2015, the Commission approved the Plan of Distribution (“Plan”)1for the 

above-captioned matter. The Plan provides for the distribution of $109,436,318.00, plus 

interest, to harmed customers according to the methodology set forth in the Plan. 

Pursuant to an order entered on November 23, 2016,2the Commission disbursed 

$63,479,137.82 for a first tranche distribution to 200 Direct Customers and 892 Indirect 

Customers. Pursuant to an order entered on February 22, 2017,3the Commission disbursed 

$5,615,131.58 for a second tranche distribution to 1 Direct Customer and 176 Indirect 

Customers. Pursuant to an order entered March 13, 2017,

4

the Commission disbursed 

$1,925,301.67 for a third tranche distribution to 2 Direct Customers and to 91 Indirect 

Customers. The Secretary has been granted authority to issue future orders to disburse 

amounts from the Fair Fund upon receipt of written certification from the Managing Executive

of the Division of Enforcement that he has received a payment file with distribution payments 

 

1

 See Order Approving a Plan of Distribution, Exchange Act Rel. No. 75519 (July 24, 2015).

2

 See Order Directing Disbursement of Fair Fund, Exchange Act Rel. No. 79235 (Nov. 23, 2016).

3

 See Order Directing Second Disbursement of Fair Fund, Exchange Act Rel. No. 80078 (Feb. 22, 2017).

4

 See Order Directing Third Disbursement of Fair Fund, Exchange Act Rel. No. 80232 (Mar. 13, 2017).
2

to Direct and/or Indirect Customers that is validated as being in accord with the Plan as 

authorized by the Commission.

The Secretary has now received written certification from the Managing Executive of 

the Division of Enforcement that he has received a conforming payment file in the amount of 

$8,954,411.01 with distribution payments to 4 Direct Customers and 78 Indirect Customers.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, that Commission staff shall disburse 

$8,954,411.01 of the Fair Fund from the JPMorgan Escrow Account to the Fund 

Administrator’s account at Citibank, N.A., and that the Fund Administrator shall distribute 

such monies to investors as provided for in the Plan. 

By the Commission. 

Brent J. Fields

Secretary
§ 300.810 Decrease in funds. If the amount available for allocations to States under § 300.807 for a fiscal year is less than the amount allocated to the States under section 619 of the Act for the preceding fiscal year, those allocations are calculated as follows: ( a ) If the amount available for allocations is greater than the amount allocated to the States for fiscal year 1997, each State is allocated the sum of— ( 1 ) The amount the State received under section 619 of the Act for fiscal year 1997; and
( 2 ) An amount that bears the same relation to any remaining funds as the increase the State received under section 619 of the Act for the preceding fiscal year over fiscal year 1997 bears to the total of all such increases for all States.
( b ) If the amount available for allocations is equal to or less than the amount allocated to the States for fiscal year 1997, each State is allocated the amount the State received for fiscal year 1997, ratably reduced, if necessary.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1419(c)(3))
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4875 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4875

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 2201 E. Maple Street in North Canton, Ohio, as the ``Lance Cpl. 
                  Stacy `Annie' Dryden Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 28, 2019

 Mr. Gonzalez of Ohio (for himself, Mr. Latta, Mr. Wenstrup, Mr. Joyce 
 of Ohio, Mr. Jordan, Ms. Fudge, Mr. Turner, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Stivers, 
  Mr. Ryan, Mr. Balderson, Mr. Davidson of Ohio, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, 
Mrs. Beatty, Ms. Kaptur, and Mr. Gibbs) introduced the following bill; 
      which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 2201 E. Maple Street in North Canton, Ohio, as the ``Lance Cpl. 
                  Stacy `Annie' Dryden Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANCE CPL. STACY ``ANNIE'' DRYDEN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2201 E. Maple Street in North Canton, Ohio, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Lance Cpl. Stacy `Annie' Dryden Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lance Cpl. 
Stacy `Annie' Dryden Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 367.30 How does a designated State agency (DSA) apply for an award?

To receive a grant under section 752(h) or a reallotment grant under section 752(i)(4) of the Act, a DSA must submit to and obtain approval from the Secretary of an application for assistance under this program at the time, in the form and manner, and containing the agreements, assurances, and information, that the Secretary determines to be necessary to carry out this program.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0660)

(Authority: Sections 752 (h) and (i)(4) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 796k(h) and (i))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 96997 / March 1, 2023

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20945

In the Matter of

Surgalign Holdings, Inc. and 

Robert P. Jordheim,

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

On May 4, 2022, the Commission issued an Omnibus Order Directing the Engagement of 

Two Tax Administrators for Appointment on a Case-By-Case Basis in Administrative 

Proceedings that Establish Distribution Funds (the “Omnibus Order”).1 The Omnibus Order 

engaged Miller Kaplan Arase LLP and Heffler, Radetich & Saitta, LLP to serve as the 

Commission’s tax administrator (“Tax Administrator”), for selection and appointment on an 

individual case basis, for calendar years 2022 through 2024 in administrative proceedings where 

the distribution fund may incur tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) 

under the Department of the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

The Director of the Division of Enforcement is authorized to appoint a Tax Administrator 

pursuant to the Omnibus Order.2 The Commission staff has requested the appointment of 

Heffler, Radetich & Saitta, LLP as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced 

proceeding.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the Omnibus Order, Heffler, Radetich & 

Saitta, LLP is appointed as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.3

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 94845 (May 4, 2022).

2

 See Delegation of Authority to Director of the Division of Enforcement, Securities Act Rel. No. 10900 (Dec. 10, 

2020).

3

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(ii).
Case 19-50277-SCS Doc 307 Filed 10/31/19 Entered 10/31/19 15:07:05 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Case 19-50277-SCS Doc 307 Filed 10/31/19 Entered 10/31/19 15:07:05 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
DISABILITY COMPENSATION

VETERAN’S ADDITIONAL PAYMENT FOR A DEPENDENT PARENT

DisabilitiesdeterminedbyVAtoberelatedtoyourmilitaryservicecanleadtomonthlynon‐taxablecompensation,enrollmentinthe  

VAhealthcaresystem,a10‐pointhiringpreferenceforfederalemploymentandotherimportantbenefits.AskyourVA  

representativeorVeteransServiceOrganizationrepresentativeaboutDisabilityCompensation,Pension,HealthCare,Caregiver  

Program,CareerServices,EducationalAssistance,HomeLoanGuaranty,Insuranceand/orDependentsandSurvivors’Benefits.

WHAT IS A DEPENDENT PARENT BENEFIT?

A Veteran whose parent(s) are dependent upon him/her for financial support may be paid additional 

benefits. Dependency of a parent is based on need. Both the parental relationship and financial 

dependency of the parent must be established to qualify for this benefit. 

WHAT ARE THE ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA?

1. Veteran is in receipt of compensation with a combined evaluation of at least 30 percent, or 

 2. Veteran is in receipt of VA educational benefits based on enrollment of 1⁄2 time or more. 

WHO ARE ELIGIBLE PARENTS?

The term “parent” means a biological father or mother, or adoptive father or mother, or a person (i.e., 

foster parent, stepparent, etc.) who for a period of not less than one year stood in the relationship of a 

parent to a veteran at any time before his or her entry into active service. 

The term “dependent parent” means that either: 

 the parent's income and net worth meet certain limits as defined by law, or 

 a parent with substantial income or assets has correspondingly high expenses 

WHY IS THE DEPENDENT PARENT BENEFIT BASED ON INCOME AND NET WORTH?

Since the benefit is based on need, VA cannot pay additional benefits for a dependent parent(s) whose 

countable income is greater than the limit set by law, or whose net worth is sufficient to meet basic 

needs without assistance from VA. To determine need, the parent(s) must report their income from 

all sources, such as gross wages, Social Security, retirement, pension, insurance, interest, and 

dividends for the last 12 months. The parent(s) must also report the current value of all assets, such 

as annuities, stocks, bonds, businesses, and bank accounts. They do not have to report personal 

property such as a home, car, furniture, or clothing. 
Contact us: www.va.gov 1-800-827-1000 

Compensation Service – December 2012 

CAN PARENTS INCOME BE REDUCED?

Yes. A portion of medical expenses may be used to reduce the amount of income VA considers when 

determining eligibility. The dependent parent(s) should report the amount of expenses paid that were 

not reimbursed by insurance. Expenses for rent (or housing), home repairs, maintenance, clothing, 

medical care, utilities, groceries, taxes, etc., should also be reported. 

HOW MUCH DOES VA PAY?

Please refer to VA Compensation Rate Tables at http://www.vba.va.gov/bln/21/Rates/ for current 

rates.

HOW CAN YOU APPLY?

Fill out VA Form 21-509, Statement of Dependency of Parents, and submit it to your local VA 

regional office. Call the toll-free number below for information about supporting materials that VA 

may need to process your claim.
**Exhibit 13.1**

----

| **Exhibit 13.1** |
|------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                    |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   CERTIFICATION          PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY          ACT OF 2002        (SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE) |

The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification is not to be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

John D G McAdam, the Chief Executive and Timothy A Scott, the Chief Financial Officer of Imperial Chemical Industries PLC, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

|   | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                      |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2.     | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Imperial Chemical Industries PLC. |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                      |

| April 5, 2004 | /s/ J D G McAdamName: John D G McAdamChief Executive/s/ T A ScottName: Timothy A ScottChief Financial Officer |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
#### § 371.31 How are grants awarded?

To the extent that funds have been appropriated under this program, the Secretary approves all applications which meet acceptable standards of program quality. If any application is not approved because of deficiencies in proposed program standards, the Secretary provides technical assistance to the applicant Indian tribe with respect to any areas of the proposal which were judged to be deficient.

(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 121(b)(1)(A) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 741(b)(1)(A))
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

BAR B ARA J. LOVE

, Appellant,

v.

RICHARD LOVE

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 1230

[ August 12, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Scott Suskauer , Judge; L.T. Case No. 502015DR005392

.

Ronald K. Lantz, North Palm Beach, for appellant.

Deanna V. Shuler, Palm Beach Gardens, and Kathryn M. Beamer,

North Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN

, G ERBER and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 669.15 Procedure for the reduction of funds. ( a ) Each fiscal year, each State determined to be in nonconformity with the requirements of this part will be advised of the funds expected to be withheld from apportionment in accordance with § 669.13 and 23 U.S.C. 141(c), as part of the advance notice of apportionments required under 23 U.S.C. 104(e), normally not later than 90 days prior to final apportionment.
( b ) A State that received a notice in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section may within 30 days of its receipt of the advance notice of apportionments, submit documentation showing why it is in conformity with this Part. Documentation shall be submitted to the Federal Highway Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
( c ) Each fiscal year, each State determined to be in nonconformity with the requirements of this part and 23 U.S.C. 141(c), based on FHWA's final determination, will receive notice of the funds being withheld from apportionment pursuant to section 669.3 and 23 U.S.C. 141(c), as part of the certification of apportionments required under 23 U.S.C. 104(e), which normally occurs on October 1 of each fiscal year.
[75 FR 43409, July 26, 2010]