alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21





IMPERIAL INDUSTRIES, INC.



Subsidiaries of the Registrant



December 31, 2004







| |                                           | Incorporated  | 
| | ----------------------------------------- | ------------- | 
| |                                           | under laws of | 
| |                                           |               | 
| | Acrocrete, Inc.                           | Florida       | 
| |                                           |               | 
| | Premix-Marbletite Manufacturing Co., Inc. | Florida       | 
| |                                           |               | 
| | Just-Rite Supply, Inc.                    | Florida       | 
| |                                           |               | 
| | Triple I Leasing, Inc. (inactive)         | Florida       |
### §760–11. Acceptance and development of fish hatchery in South Carolina

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized, in his discretion and upon such terms and conditions as he shall consider to be in the public interest, to accept by donation on behalf of the United States, title to the Orangeburg County, South Carolina, fish hatchery, together with the right to take adequate water from Orangeburg County Lake therefor. The Secretary is authorized to rehabilitate and expand the rearing ponds and other hatchery facilities, to purchase lands adjoining such station in connection with the rehabilitation and expansion of such facilities, and to equip, operate, and maintain said fish hatchery.

(Pub. L. 86–572, §1, July 5, 1960, 74 Stat. 311.)
### **CHAPTER 97—RAILROAD CARRIERS AND MASS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS ON LAND, ON WATER, OR THROUGH THE AIR**

Sec.
1991.
Entering train to commit crime.
1992.
Terrorist attacks and other violence against railroad carriers and against mass transportation systems on land, on water, or through the air.

#### Historical and Revision Notes

This chapter does not include motor busses, interstate trucking facilities or airplanes within the protection of existing law. Motor busses and trucks already carry a huge amount of interstate commerce. It is reasonable to presume that much interstate freight and express will soon be carried by air.

Attention is directed to the consideration of the extension of the laws now applicable only to railroads to these other interstate facilities. 80th Congress House Report No. 304.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2006**—Pub. L. 109–177, title I, §110(b)(1), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 208, substituted "RAILROAD CARRIERS AND MASS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS ON LAND, ON WATER, OR THROUGH THE AIR" for "RAILROADS" in chapter heading, added item 1992, and struck out former items 1992 "Wrecking trains" and 1993 "Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence against public transportation systems".

**2005**—Pub. L. 109–59, title III, §3042(b), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1640, substituted "public transportation" for "mass transportation" in item 1993.

**2001**—Pub. L. 107–56, title VIII, §801(f), Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 376, added item 1993.
Georgia Department of Natural Resources

2 Martin Luther King, Jr., Drive, S.E., Suite 1152 East, Atlanta, Georgia 30334-4100

Mark Williams, Commissioner

Environmental Protection Division

F. Allen Barnes, Director

Phone: 404/656-4713 FAX: 404/651-5778

February 28, 2011

Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming

Regional Administrator

U.S. EPA, Region 4

61 Forsyth Street, S.W.

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3104

RE: Re-Submittal of the Georgia State Implementation Plan Revisions for 

Transportation Conformity

Dear Ms. Fleming:

On November 8, 2010, the Environmental Protection Division (EPD) requested that EPA take 

action to approve revisions to rules pertaining to Chapter 391-3-1-.15 “Transportation 

Conformity.” This letter is a re-submittal of the original November 8, 2010 request for approval 

to add the Transportation Conformity Interagency Consultation Manual, which is cited by the 

rule, to the submittal.

Georgia EPD is providing one paper copy as well as a compact disc of the entire submittal 

including:

 the original (November 8, 2010) submittal;

 the proposed rule revision showing the underlined addition to the rule;

 the final copy of that revision, and

 the Transportation Conformity Interagency Consultation Manual.

Should you and your staff have questions, please contact me at (404) 363-7014.

Sincerely,

James P. Johnston

Program Manager

Planning & Support Program

JPJ:klc
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dental Patient Care America,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael Silva, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael Silva
-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2006
### §5723. Exemption

Chapter 10 of title 5 shall not apply to the Panel or to an advisory committee established under section 5722 of this title.

(Pub. L. 106–450, title II, §204, Nov. 7, 2000, 114 Stat. 1943; Pub. L. 117–286, §4(a)(127), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4319.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–286 substituted "Chapter 10 of title 5" for "The Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.)".
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10j10


                        HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
                           DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

                       (As Established September 1, 1985)


                                Ninth Amendment


                 Houston Industries Incorporated, a Texas corporation (the
"Company"), having established the Houston Industries Incorporated Deferred
Compensation Plan, effective September 1, 1985, and as thereafter amended (the
"Plan"), and having reserved the right under Section 7.1 thereof to amend the
Plan, does hereby amend the Plan, effective as of September 3, 1997 as follows:

                 1.       Sections 5.2(a), 5.2(b), and 5.2(c) of the Plan are
hereby amended by adding the following sentence at the end of each section:

         "Notwithstanding the foregoing, if there is a conflict between the
         provisions of this section and the terms of the Participant's
         Severance Agreement (as described in Section 5.4), the terms of the
         Severance Agreement shall control."

                 2.       Section 5.4 of the Plan is hereby amended by
inserting the following paragraph at the end thereof which shall read as
follows:

                 "However, if any Participant who has entered into a Severance
         Agreement, as defined in the Houston Industries Incorporated Executive
         Severance Benefits Plan, effective as of September 3, 1997,
         experiences a termination giving rise to a right to benefits under his
         Severance Agreement and complies with the conditions set forth in his
         Severance Agreement for the receipt of benefits thereunder, then such
         Participant shall be treated as if his termination did not occur until
         after his Early Retirement Date, and the provisions of Section 5.1(c)
         shall apply."
<PAGE>   2
                 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Houston Industries Incorporated has caused
these presents to be executed by its duly authorized officers in a number of
copies, all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument, which may be
sufficiently evidenced by any executed copy hereof, this 26th day of February,
1998, but effective as of the date specified herein.

                                      HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED



                                      By  /s/ LEE W. HOGAN
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Name:   Lee W. Hogan
                                             ------------------------------
                                        Title:  Executive Vice President
                                              -----------------------------

ATTEST:

/s/ RICHARD B. DAUPHIN
--------------------------------
Assistant Corporate Secretary





                                      -2-
### §828c. Applicability of this subchapter

Except as herein provided, the provisions of this subchapter shall not be construed as repealing or affecting any of the provisions of the Federal Power Act [16 U.S.C. 791a et seq.].

(Aug. 15, 1953, ch. 503, §4, 67 Stat. 587.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Power Act, referred to in text, is act June 10, 1920, ch. 285, 41 Stat. 1063, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 791a of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Federal Power Act which generally comprises this chapter.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 15349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6700]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION


Advisory Committee on the Electronic Records Archives (ACERA); 
Meeting

AGENCY: National Archives and Records Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), the National Archives and Records 
Administration (NARA) announces a meeting of the Advisory Committee on 
the Electronic Records Archives (ACERA). The committee serves as a 
deliberative body to advise the Archivist of the United States on 
technical, mission, and service related to the Electronic Records 
Archives (ERA). This includes, but is not limited to, advising and 
making recommendations to the Archivist on issues related to the 
development, implementation and use of the ERA system. This meeting 
will be open to the public. However, due to space limitations and 
access procedures, the name and telephone number of individuals 
planning to attend must be submitted to the Electronic Records Archives 
Program at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0f6a7d6e217f7d60687d6e624f616e7d6e21686079"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="117463703f61637e7663707c517f7063703f767e67">[email protected]</span></a>. This meeting will be recorded for 
transcription purposes.

DATES: This meeting will be held on April 6, 2011, from 8:30 a.m. to 
4:30 p.m. and April 7, 2011, from 9 a.m.--12 noon.

ADDRESSES: 700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20408-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Piercy, Acting Assistant 
Archivist for the Office of Information Services, National Archives and 
Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, Maryland 20740 
(301) 837--1583.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda

    (1) Opening Remarks
    (2) ERA Status Updates
    (3) Subcommittee Breakouts
    (4) Adjournment

    Dated: March 17, 2011.
Mary Ann Hadyka,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-6700 Filed 3-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>   1






                        HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
                                   EXHIBIT 23
<PAGE>   2
                                                                      Exhibit 23


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED:

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Houston Industries
Incorporated's (i) Registration Statements on Form S-3 Nos. 33-39921, 33-60756,
33-51431, 33-52207 and 33-55445 and (ii) Registration Statements on Form S-8
Nos. 33-37493, 33-50629, 33-52279, 33-55391 and 33-56855 of our report dated
February 29, 1996 (March 26, 1996 as to Note 4), appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Houston Industries Incorporated for the year ended
December 31, 1995.




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

HOUSTON, TEXAS
MARCH 27, 1996
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VICTOR ROBLEDO-GUTIERREZ, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 19-73335 

Agency No. A071-918-465 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Immigration Judge

Submitted September 8, 2020**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges. 

Victor Robledo-Gutierrez, a native and citizen on Mexico, petitions for 

review of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) determination under 8 C.F.R. § 1208.31(a) 

that he did not have a reasonable fear of persecution or torture in Mexico and thus 

is not entitled to relief from his reinstated removal order. We have jurisdiction 

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. Cerezo v. Mukasey, 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

SEP 18 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 19-73335 

512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008). We grant the petition for review, and we 

remand. 

The IJ found that Robledo-Gutierrez did not have a reasonable fear of 

persecution or torture. However, the IJ erred in stating he was bound by the “four 

corners” of the asylum officer’s decision and by not considering the merits of 

Robledo-Gutierrez’s claim that he fears persecution and torture in Mexico because 

he is the parent of a handicapped child. See Bartolome v. Sessions, 904 F.3d 803, 

812 (9th Cir. 2018) (explaining that an IJ applies de novo review during a

reasonable fear hearing, which “means that the IJ does not defer to the asylum 

officer’s ruling but freely considers the matter anew, as if no decision had been 

rendered below.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); Sagaydak v. 

Gonzales, 405 F.3d 1035, 1040 (9th Cir. 2005) (the agency is “not free to ignore 

arguments raised by a petitioner.”). Thus, we grant the petition for review and 

remand to the IJ for further proceedings consistent with this disposition. See INS v. 

Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per curiam).

The motion for a stay of removal (Docket Entry Nos. 1 and 6) is granted. 

Robledo-Gutierrez’s removal is stayed pending a decision by the IJ.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED.
### §460m–8. Establishment

For the purposes of conserving and interpreting an area containing unique scenic and scientific features, and preserving as a free-flowing stream an important segment of the Buffalo River in Arkansas for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations, the Secretary of the Interior (hereinafter referred to as the "Secretary") may establish and administer the Buffalo National River. The boundaries of the national river shall be as generally depicted on the drawing entitled "Proposed Buffalo National River" numbered NR–BUF–7103 and dated December 1967, which shall be on file and available for public inspection in the offices of the National Park Service, Department of the Interior. The Secretary is authorized to make minor revisions of the boundaries of the national river when necessary, after advising the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate in writing, but the total acreage within such boundaries shall not exceed ninety-five thousand seven hundred and thirty acres.

(Pub. L. 92–237, §1, Mar. 1, 1972, 86 Stat. 44; Pub. L. 103–437, §6(n)(1), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4586.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–437 substituted "Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate" for "Committees on Interior and Insular Affairs of the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate".
October 23, 2006

The Honorable Marion C. Blakey

Administrator

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Suite 1010

Washington, DC 20591

Dear Administrator Blakey:

We are writing in response to a Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation, Aeronautical Study

No. 2004

- AEA

- 3159

- OE of September 18, 2006, regarding the proposed construction of a Marine

Transfer Station by the New York City Department of Sanitation just outside LaGuardia Airport in

Queens, New York.

We would like to express our opinion that constructing a 110

- foot tower approximately 1900 feet

from the end of a busy runway in the midst of one of the most densely populated cities in the world is,

at best, foolhardy. Common sense dictates that a different location nowhere near the airport would be

more suitable for this project. We agree with the concerns raised by the Port Authority of New York and

New Jersey, and support its view that constructing the Marine Transfer Station at this location

needlessly endangers the flying public and citizens living in the surrounding area.

On January 28, 2005, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) determined that the project was

“presumed to be a hazard to air navigation.” However, on Septem ber 18, 2006, without any change to

the proposal, the administration determined that the Marine Transfer Station posed “no hazard to air

navigation.” We would like to inquire, and for the FAA to disclose, what considerations were made that

prompted this ch ange in the determination over the past year. In the meantime, we insist in the

strongest possible terms that the FAA support the position of the Port Authority of New York and New

Jersey in the interest of aviation safety and the well

- being of the Americ an public.

The FAA has a responsibility to ensure the safety of the flying public and the surrounding

communities of LaGuardia Airport. We thank you for your attention to this matter and look forward to

your prompt reply.

Sincerely,

GARY L. ACKERMAN CAROLYN B. MALONEY

Member of Congress Member of Congress

ANTHONY D. WEINER JOSEPH CROWLEY

Member of Congress Member of CongressGREGORY W. MEEKS

Member of Congress
# Official Journal C 42/15 F

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 42 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5115 February 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 42

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5115 February 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2008/C 042/01 | Report from the Commission on the European Community SAFA Programme (Safety Assessment of Foreign Aircraft) — (Aggregated Information — Report — 30 April to 31 December 2006) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2008/C 042/01

Report from the Commission on the European Community SAFA Programme (Safety Assessment of Foreign Aircraft) — (Aggregated Information — Report — 30 April to 31 December 2006)

(Aggregated Information — Report — 30 April to 31 December 2006)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
##### 



Exhibit 12 THE HERTZ CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF CONSOLIDATED RATIO OF EARNINGS
TO FIXED CHARGES (UNAUDITED)
(In Thousands of Dollars Except Ratios) Years Ended December 31,2003
    
    2002
    
    2001
    
    2000
    
    1999Income before income taxes
    
    $
    237,492
    
    
    $
    216,394
    
    
    $
    2,723
    
    
    $
    580,864
    
    
    $
    560,393Interest expense
    
    
    372,924
    
    
    
    376,710
    
    
    
    413,711
    
    
    
    428,387
    
    
    
    353,516Portion of rent estimated to represent the
interest factor
    
    
    118,813
    
    
    
    115,879
    
    
    
    116,393
    
    
    
    104,886
    
    
    
    90,463Earnings before income taxes and fixed
charges
    
    $
    729,229
    
    
    $
    708,983
    
    
    $
    532,827
    
    
    $
    1,114,137
    
    
    $
    1,004,372Interest expense (including capitalized
interest)
    
    $
    373,522
    
    
    $
    377,852
    
    
    $
    415,198
    
    
    $
    431,308
    
    
    $
    355,309Portion of rent estimated to represent the
interest factor
    
    
    118,813
    
    
    
    115,879
    
    
    
    116,393
    
    
    
    104,886
    
    
    
    90,463Fixed charges
    
    $
    492,335
    
    
    $
    493,731
    
    
    $
    531,591
    
    
    $
    536,194
    
    
    $
    445,772Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    1.5
    
    
    
    1.4
    
    
    
    1.0
    
    
    
    2.1
    
    
    
    2.3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 88145 / February 7, 2020

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-19511

In the Matter of

Leonardo Cornide and Jorge 

Falcon,

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

By order dated February 22, 2019, the Commission issued the “Omnibus Order 

Directing the Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that 

Establish Distribution Funds” (“Omnibus Order”),1authorizing the Secretary to issue 

orders for calendar years 2019-2021 appointing, upon request by the Commission staff, 

Miller Kaplan Arase LLP (“Miller Kaplan”), a certified public accounting firm, with one 

of their offices located in San Fransciso, California, as tax administrator (“Tax 

Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund may incur 

tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department of 

the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On February 4, 2020, the Commission staff requested, pursuant to the Omnibus 

Order, the appointment of Miller Kaplan as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the 

above-referenced proceeding. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Miller Kaplan, pursuant to and in accordance 

with the Omnibus Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the abovereferenced proceeding. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 85174 (Feb. 22, 2019).