alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      10.8

    

      Promissory
        Note Amendment 

       

      (William
        Kirby) 

       

      This
        Promissory Note Amendment (this "Amendment")
        amends
        that certain Promissory Note dated November 15, 2005 issued by DrTattoff,
        LLC
        ("Maker") to the undersigned in the original principal amount of $12,000
        (the
        "Promissory
        Note").

       

      The
        Promissory Note is due on demand by the undersigned. The undersigned hereby
        agrees that the Promissory Note shall mature and be due and payable in full
        on
        the earlier of April 1, 2008 or the closing of "Series B" round of financing
        of
        Maker that is currently contemplated by Maker in connection with and after
        the
        prospective merger by Maker with Lifesciences Opportunities Incorporated.
        

      
         

        
          	 	 	 	 
	/s/ William
                  Kirby	 	 	 
	
                  
William
                  Kirby	 	 	
                
	 	 	 	 
	Dated: July 3, 2007
Exhibit 23. Consent of Experts and Counsel


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




To The Board Of Directors and Stockholders
of Helix Technology Corporation:


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration  statement
of Helix  Technology  Corporation on Form S-8 (File No.  2-83974) of our reports
dated January 29, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated  financial  statements
and financial statement schedules of Helix Technology Corporation as of December
31, 1998 and 1997,  and for the years ended  December 31,  1998,  1997 and 1996,
which reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
-----------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 17, 1999
§ 292.4 Appearances. ( a ) *Authority to appear and act.* An appearance must be filed on the appropriate form as prescribed by DHS by the attorney or accredited representative appearing in each case. The form must be properly completed and signed by the petitioner, applicant, or respondent to authorize representation in order for the appearance to be recognized by DHS. The appearance will be recognized by the specific immigration component of DHS in which it was filed until the conclusion of the matter for which it was entered. This does not change the requirement that a new form must be filed with an appeal filed with the Administrative Appeals Office of USCIS. Substitution may be permitted upon the written withdrawal of the attorney or accredited representative of record or upon the filing of a new form by a new attorney or accredited representative. When an appearance is made by a person acting in a representative capacity, his or her personal appearance or signature will constitute a representation that under the provisions of this chapter he or she is authorized and qualified to appear as a representative as provided in 8 CFR 103.2(a)(3) and 292.1. Further proof of authority to act in a representative capacity may be required.
( b ) A party to a proceeding and his or her attorney or representative will be permitted to examine the record of proceeding in accordance with 6 CFR part 5.
[23 FR 2673, Apr. 23, 1958, as amended at 32 FR 9633, July 4, 1967; 52 FR 2941, Jan. 29, 1987; 59 FR 1466, Jan. 11, 1994; 75 FR 5230, Feb. 2, 2010; 76 FR 53797, Aug. 29, 2011]
#### Harriet L. Hawver, appellee, v. Parkway Real Estate Company et al., appellants.

Filed September 18, 1901.

No. 9,655.

1. Conflicting Evidence. A finding of fact based upon conflicting evidence will not be disturbed on review, unless clearly erroneous. .

Judicial Sale: Review. A ground for setting aside a judicial sale is unavailing- on review, unless tlie same was presented to the court below.

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county. Heard beloiv before Poavell, J.

*Affirmed.*

*John*W. *Cooper,*for appellants.

*W. M. Cowherd, Alfred Pisey*and *Paul Pisey, contra.*

Norval, C. J.

This appeal is prosecuted from an order of the district court confirming the sale of real estate made under a decree foreclosing a mortgage.

The appraisement and sale are assailed on the ground that the property was appraised at such a low sum as to amount to a fraud. Evidence in the nature of affidavits was taken on this point, which has been preserved in a bill *505of exceptions. This evidence, as might be expected, was exceedingly conflicting. That introduced on one side fully sustains the appraisement as made, while that produced by the defendants tends to show that the premises were appraised at a sum not to exceed one-half their fair market value. Conflicting evidence will not he reviewed on appeal.

It is finally insisted that the sale should he vacated for the reason the sheriff offered for sale real estate which was not embraced in, nor covered by, the decree. A sufficient answer to this contention is that the record before us does not show that the sheriff did this. Besides, the objection ivas not raised in the court below. *Creighton University v. Riley,*50 Nebr., 341. The order is

Affirmed.

Sullivan, J., absent, not voting.
#### Josephine T. Deady, Appellant, v. E. Virgil Neal, Respondent.

Motion denied on condition that appellant perfect her appeal, place the case on the calendar for September, 1913, and be ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion granted, with costs. Permission is given to appellant to submit the original Exhibits 11, 12 and 13, and also the photographs, instead of reproducing them in the record. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Stapleton, JJ.
§ 463.420 What are the roles and responsibilities of the required one-stop partners? Each required partner must: ( a ) Provide access to its programs or activities through the one-stop delivery system, in addition to any other appropriate locations;
( b ) Use a portion of funds made available to the partner's program, to the extent consistent with the Federal law authorizing the partner's program and with Federal cost principles in 2 CFR parts 200 and 3474 (requiring, among other things, that costs are allowable, reasonable, necessary, and allocable), to: ( 1 ) Provide applicable career services; and
( 2 ) Work collaboratively with the State and Local WDBs to establish and maintain the one-stop delivery system. This includes jointly funding the one-stop infrastructure through partner contributions that are based upon: ( i ) A reasonable cost allocation methodology by which infrastructure costs are charged to each partner based on proportionate use and relative benefit received;
( ii ) Federal cost principles; and
( iii ) Any local administrative cost requirements in the Federal law authorizing the partner's program. (This is further described in § 463.700.)
( c ) Enter into an MOU with the Local WDB relating to the operation of the one-stop delivery system that meets the requirements of § 463.500(b);
( d ) Participate in the operation of the one-stop delivery system consistent with the terms of the MOU, requirements of authorizing laws, the Federal cost principles, and all other applicable legal requirements; and
( e ) Provide representation on the State and Local WDBs as required and participate in Board committees as needed.
#### In the Matter of Charles O. Norstrand against William Wilson, as Commissioner of the Department of Housing and Buildings of the City of New York, et al.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 0

 1,070

 1,673

 1,847

 1,809

 1,489

 1,166

 1,098

 1,149

 1,391

 1,482

 1,843

 2,663

 3,196

 2,845

 3,797

 3,599

 4,700

 4,393

 4,218

 3,526

 2,615

 2,562

 4,407

 6,122

 6,359

 6,868

 7,583

 9,303

 9,382

 9,754

 0

 129

 135

 141

 141

 134

 137

 137

 132

 167

 175

 163

 177

 180

 166

 234

 237

 337

 378

 438

 344

 306

 331

 292

 546

 480

 389

 388

 682

 592

 604

 0

 383

 542

 648

 697

 616

 533

 431

 408

 492

 630

 775

 988

 1,157

 1,155

 1,479

 1,606

 1,976

 2,166

 2,260

 1,974

 1,639

 1,481

 1,461

 2,028

 2,714

 2,783

 3,370

 4,043

 4,051

 4,260

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 1, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 303.730 Formula for State allocations. ( a ) *Reservation of funds for outlying areas.* From the sums appropriated to carry out part C of the Act for any fiscal year, the Secretary may reserve not more than one percent for payments to American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, and the United States Virgin Islands in accordance with their respective needs for assistance under part C of the Act.
( b ) *Consolidation of funds.* The provisions of the Omnibus Territories Act of 1977, Pub. L. 95-134, permitting the consolidation of grants to the outlying areas, do not apply to the funds provided under part C of the Act.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1443(a))
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Cristóbal Conde

Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C.(S) 1350, as adopted), I, Cristóbal Conde, Chief Executive Officer of SunGard Data Systems Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that to my knowledge:



1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 (the Periodic Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 12, 2004



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Cristóbal Conde    
|Cristóbal Conde        
|Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SunGard Data Systems Inc. and will be retained by SunGard Data Systems Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

            COUNCIL JOINT ACTION 2006/202/CFSP

of 27 February 2006         

amending and extending Joint Action 2005/643/CFSP on the European Union Monitoring Mission in Aceh (Indonesia) (Aceh Monitoring Mission — AMM)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and, in particular Article 14 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS JOINT ACTION:

Article 1

Joint Action 2005/643/CFSP is hereby amended as follows:

Article 2

This Joint Action shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Article 3

This Joint Action shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 27 February 2006.

For the Council

The President

U. PLASSNIK            

----

(1)OJ L 234, 10.9.2005, p. 13.

----
§ 381.30 How are services to be administered? ( a ) Each eligible system shall carry out the protection and advocacy program authorized under this part.
( b ) An eligible system may not award a grant or make a subaward to another entity to carry out, in whole or in part, the protection and advocacy program authorized under this part.
( c ) An eligible system may contract with another agency, entity, or individual to carry out the PAIR program in whole or in part, but only if the agency, entity, or individual with whom the eligible system has contracted— ( 1 ) Does not provide services under the Act or does not provide treatment, services, or habilitation to persons with disabilities; and
( 2 ) Is independent of, and not connected financially or through a board of directors to, an entity or individual that provides services under the Act or that provides treatment, services, or habilitation to persons with disabilities.
( d ) For purposes of paragraph (c) of this section, “services under the Act” and “treatment, services, or habilitation” does not include client assistance services under CAP, protection and advocacy services authorized under the protection and advocacy programs under part C of the DD Act and the PAIMI, or any other protection and advocacy services.
(Authority: Section 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c))
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 58 (Friday, March 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 16798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7134]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
USC, as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Initial Review Group; Neuroscience Review Subcommittee.
    Date: June 9-10, 2011.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Beata Buzas, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National 
Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Room 2081, Rockville, MD 
20852, 301-443-0800, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#87e5e5f2fde6f4c7eae6eeeba9e9eeefa9e0e8f1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b9dbdbccc3d8caf9d4d8d0d597d7d0d197ded6cf">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards., National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 18, 2011.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-7134 Filed 3-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2012 - 0490 Directorate Identifier: 2012NM066AD

3377 - 11/21/79 3183, R5 --- 9/16/93

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
§ 300.153 Filing a complaint. ( a ) An organization or individual may file a signed written complaint under the procedures described in §§ 300.151 through 300.152.
( b ) The complaint must include— ( 1 ) A statement that a public agency has violated a requirement of Part B of the Act or of this part;
( 2 ) The facts on which the statement is based;
( 3 ) The signature and contact information for the complainant; and
( 4 ) If alleging violations with respect to a specific child— ( i ) The name and address of the residence of the child;
( ii ) The name of the school the child is attending;
( iii ) In the case of a homeless child or youth (within the meaning of section 725(2) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11434a(2)), available contact information for the child, and the name of the school the child is attending;
( iv ) A description of the nature of the problem of the child, including facts relating to the problem; and
( v ) A proposed resolution of the problem to the extent known and available to the party at the time the complaint is filed.
( c ) The complaint must allege a violation that occurred not more than one year prior to the date that the complaint is received in accordance with § 300.151.
( d ) The party filing the complaint must forward a copy of the complaint to the LEA or public agency serving the child at the same time the party files the complaint with the SEA.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 1820-0030 and 1820-0600) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3)
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                                      
<ARTICLE>                                                  5
<LEGEND>                                     
  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE 52 WEEKS ENDED AUGUST 2, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>                                    
                                                            
<S>                                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          AUG-2-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                             Aug-4-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                               AUG-2-1998
<CASH>                                                     10,689,193
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              6,193,947
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                15,068,618
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           36,436,516
<PP&E>                                                     27,423,929
<DEPRECIATION>                                             14,874,586
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             57,552,529
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      9,843,041
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   526,616
<OTHER-SE>                                                 39,913,634
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               57,552,529
<SALES>                                                    40,797,991
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           40,797,991
<CGS>                                                      24,169,034
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              32,507,823
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         446,109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            8,430,608
<INCOME-TAX>                                               2,934,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        5,496,608
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                               5,496,608
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              1.02
        
 

</TABLE>
#### Frank BOSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Debie BENJAMIN, property control officer; John Doe, deputy warden, sued in his individual capacity; Jane Doe, head property control officer, sued in her individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-6297.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 25, 2002.

Decided May 8, 2002.

Frank Boston, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Foster McLeod, Harris & McLeod, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Frank Boston appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. Appellant’s case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Appellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation in a timely manner.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. *See Wright v. Collins,*766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir.1985); *see also Thomas v. Arn,*474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review by failing to file timely objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be*108fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### § 609.4 What definitions apply?

(a) *General definitions.* The following terms used in this part are defined in 2 CFR part 200, subpart A, or 34 CFR 77.1:

- Applicant
- Application
- Award
- Budget
- EDGAR
- Equipment
- Fiscal year
- Grant period
- Private
- Project period
- Public
- Secretary

(b) The following definition applies to a term used in this part:

*Qualified graduate program* means a graduate or professional program that—

(i) Provides a program of instruction in the physical or natural sciences, engineering, mathematics, or other scientific disciplines in which African Americans are underrepresented;

(ii) Has been accredited or approved by a nationally recognized accrediting agency or association. (The Secretary publishes a list in the Federal Register of nationally recognized accrediting agencies and associations.); and

(iii) Has students enrolled in that program when the institution offering the program applies for a grant under this part.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1063b and 1069c)

[59 FR 38717, July 20, 1993, as amended at 79 FR 76101, Dec. 19, 2014]
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4181 — Blackstone/Center Parcs (UK) Group)

(2006/C 107/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 18 April 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----