alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §8032. Strategic plan

#### (a) Strategic plan

Not later than 2 years after December 20, 2019, the Working Group, after consultation with the relevant stakeholders, shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives a 5-year integrated strategic plan on combating IUU fishing and enhancing maritime security, including specific strategies with monitoring benchmarks for addressing IUU fishing in priority regions.

#### (b) Identification of priority regions and priority flag states

#### (1) In general

The strategic plan submitted under subsection (a) shall identify priority regions and priority flag states to be the focus of assistance coordinated by the Working Group under section 8031 of this title.

#### (2) Priority region selection criteria

In selecting priority regions under paragraph (1), the Working Group shall select regions that—

(A) are at high risk for IUU fishing activity or the entry of illegally caught seafood into their markets; and

(B) lack the capacity to fully address the issues described in subparagraph (A).

#### (3) Priority flag states selection criteria

In selecting priority flag states under paragraph (1), the Working Group shall select countries—

(A) the flagged vessels of which actively engage in, knowingly profit from, or are complicit in IUU fishing; and

(B) that lack the capacity to police their fleet.

(Pub. L. 116–92, div. C, title XXXV, §3552, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2006.)
§ 363.25 What is the period of availability of funds? ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, any Federal award funds, including reallotted funds, that are appropriated for a fiscal year to carry out a program under this part that are not obligated by the State by the beginning of the succeeding fiscal year, and any program income received during a fiscal year that is not obligated or expended by the State prior to the beginning of the succeeding fiscal year in which the program income was received, remain available for obligation by the State during that succeeding fiscal year.
( b ) Federal funds appropriated for a fiscal year and reserved for the provision of supported employment services to youth with the most significant disabilities, in accordance with § 363.22 of this part, remain available for obligation in the succeeding fiscal year only to the extent that the State met the matching requirement, as described in § 363.23, for those Federal funds by obligating, in accordance with 34 CFR 76.707, the non-Federal share in the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated. Any reserved funds carried over may only be obligated and expended in that succeeding Federal fiscal year for the provision of supported employment services to youth with the most significant disabilities.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 19 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 716)
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

(Richmond Division)

In re )

)

DIGITAL INK, INC., and )

CHRISTOPHER DAVID McGINNIS, ) Case No. 18-30056 KLP

) Chapter 7

Debtors., ) (Jointly Administered)

__________________________________________)

)

HARRY SHAIA, JR., Trustee, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) A.P. No. 18-03098-KLP

)

BMST, INC., DIGITAL INK, INC., )

CHRISTOPHER DAVID McGINNIS, )

MARK BELTRAMI and GABREILLE )

RAGLAND, a/k/a GABRIELLE CARDINALE, )

)

Defendants. )

__________________________________________)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEVER

Upon the Motion to Sever filed by Defendant Gabrielle Ragland (the “Motion”), and for 

good cause shown, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED, and it is further

ORDERED that Counts I-IV, being all claims against Defendant Ragland, are hereby 

severed from the remaining counts. The Clerk shall open a separate Adversary Proceeding with 

a separate Adversary Proceeding number in the Jointly Administered main case, and all further 

proceedings related to Counts I-IV shall be filed in that Adversary Proceeding, which shall be 

deemed brought solely by the Trustee of the estate of Christopher David McGinnis, No. 17-

32815-KLP, against Ms. Ragland, who shall no longer be deemed a party in No. 18-03098.

Case 19-03019-KLP Doc 1 Filed 02/12/19 Entered 02/12/19 15:01:10 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
Dated: ___________ _________________________________

Judge, U.S. Bankruptcy Court

Entered on Docket: ______________

I ASK FOR THIS:

_/s/ Daniel M. Press _______

Daniel M. Press, VSB 37123

CHUNG & PRESS, P.C,

6718 Whittier Ave., Suite 200

McLean, VA 22101

(703) 734-3800

Counsel for Defendant Ragland

SEEN:

/s/ Kimberly A. Taylor______

Kimberly A. Taylor, Esq.

Kepley Broscious & Biggs, PLC

2211 Pump Road

Richmond, VA 23233

(757) 636-9826

Counsel for Plaintiff

SEEN:

/s/ Franklin R. Cragle, III_______

Franklin R. Cragle, III, Esq.

Hirschler Fleischer, PC

2100 East Cary St., PO Box 500

Richmond, VA 23218-0500

(804) 771-9515

Counsel for Defendants Beltrami and BMST

SEEN:

/s/ Robert A. Canfield________

Robert A. Canfield, Esq.

Canfield, Wells & Kruck, LLP

4124 E. Parham Road

Henrico, VA 23228

(804) 673-6600

Counsel for Defendant McGinnis

Feb 11 2019 /s/ Keith L. Phillips

Feb 12 2019

Case 19-03019-KLP Doc 1 Filed 02/12/19 Entered 02/12/19 15:01:10 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
Local Rule 9022-1(C) Certification

The foregoing Order was endorsed by and/or served upon all necessary parties pursuant to Local 

Rule 9022-1(C).

__/s/Daniel M. Press___

Daniel M. Press

Case 19-03019-KLP Doc 1 Filed 02/12/19 Entered 02/12/19 15:01:10 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
Editorial Note on Part 1003
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1003 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10350, Mar. 5, 2003.

§ 1003.9 Office of the Chief Immigration Judge. ( a ) *Organization.* Within the Executive Office for Immigration Review, there shall be an Office of the Chief Immigration Judge (OCIJ), consisting of the Chief Immigration Judge, the immigration judges, and such other staff as the Director deems necessary. The Attorney General shall appoint the Chief Immigration Judge. The Director may designate immigration judges to serve as Deputy and Assistant Chief Immigration Judges as may be necessary to assist the Chief Immigration Judge in the management of the OCIJ.
( b ) *Powers of the Chief Immigration Judge.* Subject to the supervision of the Director, the Chief Immigration Judge shall be responsible for the supervision, direction, and scheduling of the immigration judges in the conduct of the hearings and duties assigned to them. The Chief Immigration Judge shall have the authority to: ( 1 ) Issue operational instructions and policy, including procedural instructions regarding the implementation of new statutory or regulatory authorities;
( 2 ) Provide for appropriate training of the immigration judges and other OCIJ staff on the conduct of their powers and duties;
( 3 ) Direct the conduct of all employees assigned to OCIJ to ensure the efficient disposition of all pending cases, including the power, in his discretion, to set priorities or time frames for the resolution of cases, to direct that the adjudication of certain cases be deferred, to regulate the assignment of immigration judges to cases, and otherwise to manage the docket of matters to be decided by the immigration judges;
( 4 ) Evaluate the performance of the Immigration Courts and other OCIJ activities by making appropriate reports and inspections, and take corrective action where needed;
( 5 ) Adjudicate cases as an immigration judge, including the authorities described in § 1003.10(b); and
( 6 ) Exercise such other authorities as the Director may provide.
( c ) *Limit on the Authority of the Chief Immigration Judge.* The Chief Immigration Judge shall have no authority to direct the result of an adjudication assigned to another immigration judge, provided, however, that nothing in this part shall be construed to limit the authority of the Chief Immigration Judge in paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) *Immigration Court.* The term Immigration Court shall refer to the local sites of the OCIJ where proceedings are held before immigration judges and where the records of those proceedings are created and maintained.
[72 FR 53677, Sept. 20, 2007, as amended at 89 FR 46792, May 29, 2024]
§ 300.504 Procedural safeguards notice. ( a ) *General.* A copy of the procedural safeguards available to the parents of a child with a disability must be given to the parents only one time a school year, except that a copy also must be given to the parents— ( 1 ) Upon initial referral or parent request for evaluation;
( 2 ) Upon receipt of the first State complaint under §§ 300.151 through 300.153 and upon receipt of the first due process complaint under § 300.507 in a school year;
( 3 ) In accordance with the discipline procedures in § 300.530(h); and
( 4 ) Upon request by a parent.
( b ) *Internet Web site.* A public agency may place a current copy of the procedural safeguards notice on its Internet Web site if a Web site exists.
( c ) *Contents.* The procedural safeguards notice must include a full explanation of all of the procedural safeguards available under § 300.148, §§ 300.151 through 300.153, § 300.300, §§ 300.502 through 300.503, §§ 300.505 through 300.518, §§ 300.530 through 300.536 and §§ 300.610 through 300.625 relating to— ( 1 ) Independent educational evaluations;
( 2 ) Prior written notice;
( 3 ) Parental consent;
( 4 ) Access to education records;
( 5 ) Opportunity to present and resolve complaints through the due process complaint and State complaint procedures, including— ( i ) The time period in which to file a complaint;
( ii ) The opportunity for the agency to resolve the complaint; and
( iii ) The difference between the due process complaint and the State complaint procedures, including the jurisdiction of each procedure, what issues may be raised, filing and decisional timelines, and relevant procedures;
( 6 ) The availability of mediation;
( 7 ) The child's placement during the pendency of any due process complaint;
( 8 ) Procedures for students who are subject to placement in an interim alternative educational setting;
( 9 ) Requirements for unilateral placement by parents of children in private schools at public expense;
( 10 ) Hearings on due process complaints, including requirements for disclosure of evaluation results and recommendations;
( 11 ) State-level appeals (if applicable in the State);
( 12 ) Civil actions, including the time period in which to file those actions; and
( 13 ) Attorneys' fees.
( d ) *Notice in understandable language.* The notice required under paragraph (a) of this section must meet the requirements of § 300.503(c).
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0600) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1415(d))
[71 FR 46753, Aug. 14, 2006, as amended at 72 FR 61307, Oct. 30, 2007]
### **CHAPTER 40—IMPORTATION, MANUFACTURE, DISTRIBUTION AND STORAGE OF EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS**

Sec.
841.
Definitions.
842.
Unlawful acts.
843.
Licenses and user permits.
844.
Penalties.
845.
Exceptions; relief from disabilities.
846.
Additional powers of the Attorney General.
847.
Rules and regulations.
848.
Effect on State law.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2002**—Pub. L. 107–296, title XI, §1112(e)(3), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2276, substituted "Attorney General" for "Secretary" in item 846.

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXV, §3520, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4923, substituted "Licenses" for "Licensing" in item 843.

**1970**—Pub. L. 91–452, title XI, §1102(a), Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 952, added chapter 40 and items 841 to 848.
Accumulated Precipitation for Water Year To Date in Inches

Reservoir Current WY 

2024

WY 1977 WY 1983 Average

(N Years)

% of

Average

Last

24 Hours

Trinity at Fish Hatchery 33.92 20.43 36.84 26.57 ( 64) 128 0.00

Sacramento at Shasta Dam 60.83 31.80 78.20 52.37 ( 69) 116 0.00

American at Blue Canyon 45.82 104.73 56.43 ( 50) 81 0.00

Stanislaus at New Melones 26.30 --- 34.79 24.07 ( 47) 109 0.00

San Joaquin at Huntington Lk 29.20 11.50 59.10 35.18 ( 51) 83 0.21

Accumulated Inflow for Water Year to Date in Thousands of Acre-Feet

Reservoir Current WY 2024 WY 1977 WY 1983 15 Yr Avg % of 15 Yr Avg

Trinity 910 322 1,230 614 148

Shasta 3,947 2,123 6,059 3,196 124

Folsom 1,276 745 3,606 1,530 83

New Melones 472 --- 983 517 91

Millerton 709 442 938 577 123

Reservoir Releases in Cubic Feet/Second

Reservoir Dam WY 2023 WY 2024 15 Yr Median

Trinity Lewiston 2,248 303 308

Sacramento Keswick 3,356 6,128 4,500

Feather Oroville(SWP) 7,500 7,000 1,750

American Nimbus 7,032 3,889 2,034

Stanislaus Goodwin 1,502 330 800

San Joaquin Friant 9,086 548 375

Storage in Major Reservoirs in Thousands of Acre-Feet

Reservoir Capacity 15 Yr Avg WY 2023 WY 2024 % of 15 Yr Avg

Trinity 2,448 1,661 916 2,013 121

Shasta 4,552 3,573 3,995 4,324 121

Folsom 977 646 673 751 116

New Melones 2,420 1,509 1,416 2,024 134

Fed. San Luis 966 721 963 955 133

Total North CVP 11,363 8,111 7,963 10,067 124

Millerton 521 304 231 446 147

Oroville (SWP) 3,538 2,482 2,978 3,148 127

Historical Archive and Report Database

Daily CVP Water Supply

Run Date: 4/10/2024

April 9, 2024
###### Editorial Note on Part 1240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1240 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10355, Mar. 3, 2003.

#### § 1240.44 Interpreter.

Any person acting as interpreter in a hearing before an immigration judge under this part shall be sworn to interpret and translate accurately, unless the interpreter is an employee of the United States Government, in which event no such oath shall be required.
§ 303.205 Description of use of funds. ( a ) *General.* Each State application must include a description of the uses for funds under this part for the fiscal year or years covered by the application. The description must be presented separately for the lead agency and the Council and include the information required in paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section.
( b ) *State administration funds including administrative positions.* For lead agencies other than State educational agencies (SEAs), each application must include the total— ( 1 ) Amount of funds retained by the lead agency for administration purposes, including the amount in paragraph (b)(2) of this section; and
( 2 ) Number of full-time equivalent administrative positions to be used to implement part C of the Act, and the total amount of salaries (including benefits) for those positions.
( c ) *Maintenance and implementation activities.* Each application must include a description of the nature and scope of each major activity to be carried out under this part, consistent with § 303.501, and the approximate amount of funds to be spent for each activity.
( d ) *Direct services.* Each application must include a description of any direct services that the State expects to provide to infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families with funds under this part, consistent with § 303.501, and the approximate amount of funds under this part to be used for the provision of each direct service.
( e ) *Activities by other public agencies.* If other public agencies are to receive funds under this part, the application must include— ( 1 ) The name of each agency expected to receive funds;
( 2 ) The approximate amount of funds each agency will receive; and
( 3 ) A summary of the purposes for which the funds will be used.
(Approved by Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0550) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1435(a)(10)(B), 1435(a)(10)(F), 1437(a)(3), 1437(a)(5))
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TOR SKRODER,

Appellant,

v.

GUILLERMO TEJADA and GUSTAVO LORENZO, 

Appellees.

No. 4D18-2680 

[May 2, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Joseph Murphy, Senior Judge; L.T. Case Nos. DVCE 18-

1813 (59) and DVCE 18-1096 (63).

Thomas Regnier of Tom Regnier Appeals, P.A., Sunrise, for appellant.

Andrew J. Mayts, Jr. of Gray Robinson, P.A., Tampa; Eric T. 

Schwartzreich of Schwartzreich & Associates, P.A., Fort Lauderdale; and 

Jason Kaufman of Kaufman Legal Group, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, LEVINE, JJ., and ROWE, CYMONIE, Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### §935. Acquisition of real property; construction and operation of lamprey control works; entry into agreements for construction and operation of works

In order to carry out the obligations of the United States under the Convention, the United States Section is authorized—

(a) to acquire any real property, or any interest therein, by purchase, exchange, gift, dedication, condemnation, or otherwise;

(b) to construct, operate, and maintain any project or works designed to facilitate compliance with the provisions of the Convention relating to the sea lamprey control program; and

(c) to enter into contract or agreement with any State or other public agency or private agency or individual for the construction, operation, or maintenance of any such project or works.

(June 4, 1956, ch. 358, §6, 70 Stat. 243.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### United States Fish and Wildlife Service; Work on Sea Lamprey Program; Reimbursements

Pub. L. 101–512, title I, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1918, provided in part that: "beginning October 1, 1990, and thereafter, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service can perform work for the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, authorized by 16 U.S.C. 931–939c, Great Lakes Fisheries [Fishery] Act of 1956, on the sea lamprey program on a reimbursable basis: Provided further, That such reimbursements are to be treated as Intragovernmental funds as defined in the publication titled 'A Glossary of Terms Used in the Federal Budget Process'."
#### § 300.806 Eligibility for financial assistance.

No State or LEA, or other public institution or agency, may receive a grant or enter into a contract or cooperative agreement under subpart 2 or 3 of Part D of the Act that relates exclusively to programs, projects, and activities pertaining to children aged three through five years, unless the State is eligible to receive a grant under section 619(b) of the Act.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1481(e))
§ 810.208 Action by the Federal Highway Administrator. The Federal Highway Administrator may authorize the State to make available to the publicly-owned mass transit authority the land needed for the proposed facility, if it is determined that: ( a ) The evidence submitted by the State highway agency under § 810.206 is satisfactory;
( b ) The public interest will be served thereby; and
( c ) The proposed action in urbanized areas is based on a continuing, comprehensive transportation planning process carried on in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 134 as described under 23 CFR part 450, subpart A.
# L_2008274EN.01S00301.xml

| 15.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 274/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 274/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
1

NO. PD-0857-14

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

14-12-00642-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOURTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

KENNETH LEE DOUDS, 

Appellant

v.

STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

On Petition for Discretionary Review from the 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 14-12-00642-

CR, reversing the trial court in Cause No. 180270 in 

County Court at Law No. 1 of Brazoria County, Texas

APPELLEE’S NOTIFICATION OF APPEARANCE AT ORAL ARGUMENT 

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL 

APPEALS:

 The Appellee in Cause No. 180270 in the County 

Court at Law No. One of Brazoria County, Texas, 

respectfully submits this Appellee’s Notification of 

PD-0857-14

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 2/20/2015 3:45:38 PM

Accepted 2/23/2015 8:14:52 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
2

Appearance at Oral Argument and would respectfully 

inform the Court of the following:

Charles Adams will be representing the Appellee at 

oral argument on Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 9:00 A.M. 

in the above styled and number cause, before the Court 

of Criminal Appeals in Austin, Texas. 

Respectfully submitted,

CHARLES D. ADAMS, IV

 By: /s/ Charles D. Adams

Charles D. Adams, IV

Texas Bar No.: 24026760

7930 Broadway, Suite 106

Pearland, Texas 77546

cadams4@gmail.com

Tel. (281) 412-4151

Fax. (281) 412-4581

Attorney for Kenneth Lee Douds
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this the 20th day of 

February, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above, 

attached and foregoing Appellee’s Notification of 

Appearance at Oral Argument was served upon the 

Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office in 

accordance with Rule 9.5 of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure and a copy was also served on the 

State Prosecuting Attorney in compliance with Rule 

68.11 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Jeri Yenne

District Attorney

111 E. Locust, Suite 408A

Angleton, Texas 77515

Texas Bar No. 04240950

Email: melodye@brazoria-county.com

Fax: (979) 864-1525

David Bosserman

Assistant District Attorney

111 E. Locust, Suite 408A

Angleton, Texas 77515

Texas Bar No. 02679520

Email: davidb@brazoria-county.com

Fax: (979)864-1525
4

Lisa C. McMinn

State Prosecuting Attorney

P.O. Box 13046

Austin, Texas 78711

Texas Bar No. 13803300

Email: Lisa.McMinn@spa.texas.gov

Email: information@spa.texas.gov

/s/ Charles D. Adams

Charles D. Adams