alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 1 
          - [FCC 06-94] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Final rule; announcement of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Federal Communications Commission has published a number of requirements related to practice and procedure before the Commission. This document announces the approval of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for information collection requirements contained in the sections outlined in the                         **DATES**                         section.                     

# DATES:

Effective March 30, 2011, the following regulation has been approved by OMB: 47 CFR 1.47(h), published at 71 FR 38781, July 10, 2006. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nicholas Degani, Telecommunications Access Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-7400. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

On July 10, 2006, the Commission published a Report and Order at 71 FR 38781. That Report and Order amended, among other sections, § 1.47(h) of the Commission rules to require interconnected Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) providers to designate an agent for service of documents. On March 19, 2007, OMB approved the information collection requirements contained in § 1.47(h) of title 47 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations as a revision to OMB Control Number 3060-0855. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2011-7383 Filed 3-29-11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
# Official Journal C 178/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 178 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5031 July 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 178

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5031 July 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2007/C 178/01 | Special report No 3/2007 concerning the management of the European Refugee Fund (2000 to 2004) together with the Commission's replies | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Court of Auditors

2007/C 178/01

Special report No 3/2007 concerning the management of the European Refugee Fund (2000 to 2004) together with the Commission's replies

1

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2007/C 178/02 | Corrigendum to Special Report No 2/2007 concerning the Institutions' expenditure on buildings together with the Institutions' replies (OJ C 148, 2.7.2007) | 24 |

Corrigenda

2007/C 178/02

Corrigendum to Special Report No 2/2007 concerning the Institutions' expenditure on buildings together with the Institutions' replies (OJ C 148, 2.7.2007)

24

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 2,829

 3,529

 3,415

 2,811

 2,058

 2,149

 2,728

 3,903

 3,712

 5,392

 4,562

 3,378

 2,815

 3,046

 2,842

 3,100

 2,946

 3,817

 3,936

 3,924

 3,064

 2,561

 2,924

 4,135

 5,754

 7,171

 8,506

 9,200

 8,448

 8,560

 7,975

 124

 132

 130

 139

 143

 138

 141

 243

 343

 190

 220

 169

 166

 176

 150

 191

 250

 688

 839

 685

 409

 234

 188

 188

 198

 221

 277

 529

 1,772

 2,132

 2,110

 1,126

 1,325

 1,421

 1,272

 1,050

 975

 1,135

 1,571

 1,478

 1,684

 1,825

 1,346

 1,182

 1,220

 1,161

 1,313

 1,534

 1,982

 2,080

 2,046

 1,573

 1,202

 1,250

 1,551

 2,018

 2,779

 3,368

 4,223

 5,206

 5,396

 5,046

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 14, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
United States Bankruptcy Court 

Eastern District of Virginia 

________________ Division 

In re: 

Case Number ________________ 

Debtor(s) Chapter ____

ORDER

 A hearing was held on ______________________, pursuant to the Order Setting Hearing 

entered by the Clerk.

 The debtor(s) appeared at the hearing. 

 The debtor(s) did not appear at the hearing. 

 Counsel for the debtor(s) appeared at the hearing. 

 For the reasons stated on the record from the bench, the Court ORDERS: 

 The debtor(s) shall cure the following deficiency(ies) on or before ____________________

see attached Exhibit A: 

Failure to timely cure each deficiency listed above will result in the above-captioned 

bankruptcy case being dismissed without further notice or hearing. 

 The case is dismissed because the debtor(s) failed to appear at the hearing; and it is further 

 The case is dismissed; and it is further 

ORDERED that the debtor(s) pay the balance of the filing fee in the amount of 

$______________ to the Clerk of Court within 14 days of the date of this order; and it is further 

ORDERED that dismissal of this case revests the property of the estate in the entity in 

which such property was vested immediately before the commencement of the case. The trustee 

need not file a final report unless property or money was administered. 

Date: ____________________ _________________________________ 

United States Bankruptcy Judge 

NOTICE OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER 

ENTERED ON DOCKET: ___________________ 

[opursosethrg ver. 07/18] 

Alexandria

Samuel Palomino

18-12664-KHK

13

09/13/2018

✔

✔

0.00

Sep 14 2018 /s/ Klinette Kindred

Sep 14 2018

Case 18-12664-KHK Doc 19 Filed 09/14/18 Entered 09/14/18 13:54:58 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Exhibit A 

Case 18-12664-KHK Doc 19 Filed 09/14/18 Entered 09/14/18 13:54:58 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
#### § 303.32 [Reserved]
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 32005M3690

**Commission Decision of 14/02/2005 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.3690 - CNP / CAPITALIA / FINECO VITA) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the Italian text is authentic)****

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3690 — CNP/Capitalia/Fineco Vita)

(2005/C 42/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 14 February 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in Italian and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

-  from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

-  in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3690. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

--------------------------------------------------
#### § 222.1 What is the scope of this part?

The regulations in this part govern the provision of financial assistance under title VIII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) to local educational agencies (LEAs) in areas affected by Federal activities.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7701-7714)
### **CHAPTER 109—SEARCHES AND SEIZURES**

Sec.
2231.
Assault or resistance.
2232.
Destruction or removal of property to prevent seizure.
2233.
Rescue of seized property.
2234.
Authority exceeded in executing warrant.
2235.
Search warrant procured maliciously.
2236.
Searches without warrant.
2237.
Criminal sanctions for failure to heave to, obstruction of boarding, or providing false information.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2006**—Pub. L. 109–177, title III, §303(b), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 234, added item 2237.
#### § 1235.6 Parking.

Special license plates, removable windshield placards, or temporary removable windshield placards displaying the International Symbol of Access shall be the only recognized means of identifying vehicles permitted to utilize parking spaces reserved for persons with disabilities which limit or impair the ability to walk.
(No. 74-CC-313

#### Standard Oil Division, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Conservation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 13, 1974.*

Standard Oil Division, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF

VIRGINIA

RICHMOND DIVISION

IN RE:

DELBRIA D. SCOTT

Debtor(s).

Chapter 13

Case No.:

16-36099-KRH Trustee:

Carl M. Bates

Motion for Order Authorizing Extension of Time for Filing Certification of

Completion of Personal Financial Management

COMES NOW the Debtor(s), Delbria D. Scott and by her Attorney, Jacqueline W.

Critzer of Critzer Cardani, P.C. pursuant to Federal and Local Bankruptcy Rules 1007, 3015

and 9006, and for her Motion to Extend Time state as follows:

1. Movant is the above-named debtor, having filed her petition for Chapter 13

bankruptcy on December 14, 2016.

2. The debtor's certification of completion of personal financial management was due on

April 12, 2021.

3. Counsel has attempted to reach debtor multiple times by phone, email and

regular USPS to remind her of the requirement to complete the certification

of personal financial management, but debtor has not responded.

4. An extension of time to May 12, 2021 to file the certification of completion of Personal

Financial Management is necessary for counsel to make further attempts to reach 

Case 16-36099-KRH Doc 68 Filed 04/14/21 Entered 04/14/21 17:53:48 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
the debtor so the case to proceed to discharge. 

WHEREFORE, movant prays that an order be made and entered herein extending to and 

until May 12, 2021; and for such further and other relief as is just. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Jacqueline W. Critzer

Counsel for Delbria Scott

Date: April 14, 2021 

/s/ Jacqueline W. Critzer, Esq. 

Jacqueline W. Critzer, Esq. (VSB # 71569)

Critzer Cardani PC

A Debt Relief Agency/Counsel for Debtor

12090 West Broad Street

Suite 200 

Richmond, Virginia 23233 

804-793-8010 

Certification of Service

I hereby certify that on April 14, 2021, a true copy of the foregoing Notice of Motion and Motion 

to Extend were mailed via first class mail or electronic mail to Carl M. Bates, Chapter 13 Trustee

at P. O. Box 1819, Richmond, Virginia 23218 and the United States Trustee at 701 E. Broad 

Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 and to all necessary parties. 

/s/ Jacqueline W. Critzer, Esq. 

Jacqueline W. Critzer, Esq. (VSB # 71569)

Critzer Cardani, P.C. 

A Debt ReliefAgency/Counsel for Debtor

12090 West Broad Street

Suite 200 

Richmond, Virginia

23233 804-793-8010 

Case 16-36099-KRH Doc 68 Filed 04/14/21 Entered 04/14/21 17:53:48 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
### §824r. Protection of transmission contracts in the Pacific Northwest

#### (a) Definition of electric utility or person

In this section, the term "electric utility or person" means an electric utility or person that—

(1) as of August 8, 2005, holds firm transmission rights pursuant to contract or by reason of ownership of transmission facilities; and

(2) is located—

(A) in the Pacific Northwest, as that region is defined in section 839a of this title; or

(B) in that portion of a State included in the geographic area proposed for a regional transmission organization in Commission Docket Number RT01–35 on the date on which that docket was opened.

#### (b) Protection of transmission contracts

Nothing in this chapter confers on the Commission the authority to require an electric utility or person to convert to tradable or financial rights—

(1) firm transmission rights described in subsection (a); or

(2) firm transmission rights obtained by exercising contract or tariff rights associated with the firm transmission rights described in subsection (a).

(June 10, 1920, ch. 285, pt. II, §218, as added Pub. L. 109–58, title XII, §1235, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 960.)
# Official Journal C 93A/20 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 93A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5820 March 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 93A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5820 March 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 093A/01 | Publication of a vacancy for the Executive Director of the ECSEL Joint Undertaking, Brussels (Temporary Agent Grade AD14) — COM/2015/20003 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2015/C 093A/01

Publication of a vacancy for the Executive Director of the ECSEL Joint Undertaking, Brussels (Temporary Agent Grade AD14) — COM/2015/20003

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.9

                                AMENDMENT NO.5

                                       TO

                  CORPORATE REVOLVING AND TERM LOAN AGREEMENT

     Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (the "Bank") and C.H. Heist Corp. 
(the "Borrower") hereby agree as follows:

     1.   Loan Agreement.  The Bank and the Borrower are parties to a Corporate 
Revolving and Term Loan Agreement dated December 23, 1993, and as amended (the 
"Loan Agreement").  The Bank and the Borrower wish to amend the Loan Agreement 
as set forth herein.

     2.   Amendment to Loan Agreement.  The Bank and the Borrower hereby agree 
that the Loan Agreement is amended as follows:

          a.   Section 2.(i) of the Loan Agreement is modified to read in 
entirety as follows:  "Compensating balances may, but need not, be maintained 
by the Borrower with the Bank with respect to all Revolving Loans.  Such 
compensating balances shall be unrestricted as to use at any time."

          b.   Section 11.dd(i) of the Loan Agreement, as previously amended, 
is modified so that the reference to "August 1, 1999" is deleted and "August 1, 
2000" is substituted in its place.

     3.   Except as expressly modified herein, the Loan Agreement otherwise 
remains unchanged and the Borrower hereby ratifies and reaffirms the Loan 
Agreement, as amended, and  any other documents executed in connection 
therewith, and agrees that the Loan Agreement and all documents executed in 
connection herewith are in full force and effect and fully enforceable with 
their terms and not subject to any offset, claim, counterclaim or defense.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 5 to 
be duly executed by their authorized officers as of the 1st day of July, 1998.


<TABLE>
<S>                                     <C>
C. H. HEIST CORP.                       MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS
                                        TRUST COMPANY


By: /s/ John L. Rowley                  By:  /s/ Kevin B. Quinn
    ----------------------                   -----------------------
    John L. Rowley                           Kevin B. Quinn
    Vice President and                       Assistant Vice President
    Chief Financial Officer 

</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 10.32

Supplemental Agreement
(English Translation)

This Supplementary Agreement has been entered
into by the following parties on June 12, 2009:

Party A: Taiwan Richlink Enterprise Company Ltd.

Party B: Tianjin Yayi Industrial Co., Ltd. 
Party C: Li Liu

Whereas,

Party A and Party B
signed Goat Milk Odor Elimination Technology License Agreement on April 10, 2001
(Original Agreement). Under the Original Agreement, Party A agrees to
authorize Party B to use two proprietary technologies regarding physical
treatment of goat milk and chemical treatment of goat milk (Proprietary
Technologies) for fee for a period of ten years upon the end of which Party
B shall have the right to continue using such Proprietary Technologies free of
any further charges. The license fee for such Proprietary Technology is RMB 0.2
million Yuan per year, RMB 2 million Yuan in total. Up to the signing date of
this supplementary agreement, Party B has paid RMB 0.2 million Yuan to Party A.

The parties hereby
entered into this supplementary agreement as follows: 
1.   Each party agrees that the total license fee for the Proprietary
Technologies shall be reduced to RMB 1.0 million Yuan; Party C shall, on behalf
of Party B, pay the remaining license fee of RMB 0.8 million Yuan in lump sum to
Party A. Party A agrees to waive Party Bs obligation to pay the remaining
license fee, and hereby irrevocably waives the right to claim the remaining
license fee with respect to the Proprietary Technologies. 
2.   Each party agrees the right to use the Proprietary Technologies
as Party A grants to Party B is exclusive licensing within the mainland China.

3.   Party A represents hereby that, it is the owner of the
intellectual rights with respect to the Proprietary Technologies; it has the
right to license such Proprietary Technologies to Party B; and the licensing to
use the Proprietary Technologies as granted by Party B will not infringe upon
any third partys intellectual rights or any other rights. 
4.   Party A agrees that Party B and its affiliates and subsidiaries
have the right to use the Proprietary Technologies free of charge and without
any time limitation.

---

5.

6.

In witness hereof, each party of this supplemental
agreement has caused its authorized representative to execute this supplemental
agreement on the date first appears above.

Party A: Taiwan Richlink Enterprise Company Ltd. 
(Corporate seal)

Party B: Tianjin Yayi Industrial Co., Ltd. 
Authorized Representative: /s/ Li Liu
Corporate seal

Party C: Li Liu 
Signature: /s/ Li Liu



2

---
#### § 300.815 Subgrants to LEAs.

Each State that receives a grant under section 619 of the Act for any fiscal year must distribute all of the grant funds the State does not reserve under § 300.812 to LEAs (including public charter schools that operate as LEAs) in the State that have established their eligibility under section 613 of the Act. Effective with funds that become available on July 1, 2009, each State must distribute funds to eligible LEAs that are responsible for providing education to children aged three through five years, including public charter schools that operate as LEAs, even if the LEA is not serving any preschool children with disabilities.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1419(g)(1))

[73 FR 73028, Dec. 1, 2008]
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Sub Surface Waste Management of
Delaware, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending September 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Bruce S. Beattie, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss..1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss..906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                                 /S/ BRUCE S. BEATTIE
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Bruce S. Beattie
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 January 18, 2005
No. 85403 

FILED 

NOV 0 3 20 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

IN THE MATTER OF: STEVEN J. 

SINGER LIVING TRUST, DATED 

JANUARY 15, 2011. 

KARINA SINGER, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

LENORE BOEKANKAMP; AND 

NATASHA SINGER, 

Res • ondents. 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This is a pro se appeal from an order denying appellant's 

"Motion to Strike Unlawful Order for Attempt to Intentionally Defraud the 

Court ("Motion to Strike")," "Notice of Motion and Motion for an Order to 

Enforce Court Orders," and "Motion for an Order to Show Cause Regarding 

Contempt." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jessica K. 

Peterson, Judge. 

Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to 

NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the order designated 

in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). 

This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is 

authorized by statute or court rule. Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 
Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013). No statute or court rule provides 

for an appeal from the order identified here. Accordingly, this court 

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED. 

J. 

Hardesty 

.41.4C4%.0 

J. 

Stiglich 

J. 

Herndon 

cc: Hon. Jessica K. Peterson, District Judge 

Karina Singer 

Ghandi Deeter Blackham 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

( 01 1947A .4D. 2
§ 1300.34 Program income. ( a ) *Definition.* Program income means gross income earned by the State or a subrecipient that is directly generated by a supported activity or earned as a result of the Federal award during the period of performance.
( b ) *Inclusions.* Program income includes but is not limited to income from fees for services performed, the use or rental of real or personal property acquired under Federal awards, the sale of commodities or items fabricated under a Federal award, license fees and royalties on patents and copyrights, and principal and interest on loans made with Federal award funds.
( c ) *Exclusions.* Program income does not include interest on grant funds, rebates, credits, discounts, taxes, special assessments, levies, and fines raised by a State or a subrecipient, and interest earned on any of them.
( d ) *Use of program income* — ( 1 ) *Addition.* Program income shall ordinarily be added to the funds committed to the Federal award (*i.e.,* Section 402, Section 405(b), etc.) under which it was generated. Such program income shall be used to further the objectives of the program area under which it was generated.
( 2 ) *Cost sharing or matching.* Program income may be used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements only upon written approval of the Regional Administrator. Such use shall not increase the commitment of Federal funds.