alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE

OF MARYLAND

* COURT OF APPEALS

* OF MARYLAND

v.

 * Misc. Docket AG No. 32

EVAN J. KRAME * September Term, 2021

ORDER

Upon consideration of the “Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action, and

Request for Immediate Temporary Suspension Pending Final Disposition in the District of 

Columbia,” and attachments thereto, and the Respondent’s response to this Court’s Order 

to Show Cause, it is this 19th day of November, 2021

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, in accordance with Maryland 

Rule 19-737(d)(2), that Evan J. Krame, Respondent, is hereby temporarily suspended, 

effective immediately, from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, pending further 

order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Evan J. Krame

from the register of attorneys in this Court and comply with the notice provisions of 

Maryland Rule 19-761(b).

 /s/ Joseph M. Getty

 Chief Judge
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4790 

To redesignate the NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at Plum Brook 

Station, Ohio, as the NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at the 

Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 22, 2019 

Ms. KAPTUR (for herself, Mr. GONZALEZ of Ohio, Mr. RYAN, Mr. CHABOT, 

Ms. FUDGE, Mr. BALDERSON, Mrs. BEATTY, Mr. LATTA, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. 

TURNER, Mr. JOYCE of Ohio, Mr. JORDAN, Mr. WENSTRUP, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. STIVERS, Mr. DAVIDSON of Ohio, and Mr. POSEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Science, Space, and Technology 

A BILL 

To redesignate the NASA John H. Glenn Research Center 

at Plum Brook Station, Ohio, as the NASA John H. 

Glenn Research Center at the Neil A. Armstrong Test 

Facility. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Neil A. Armstrong 

5 Test Facility Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4790 IH

1 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

2 Congress finds as follows: 

3 (1) Neil A. Armstrong, through his own defini4 tion, was first and foremost a test pilot. 

5 (2) A native of Wapakoneta, Ohio, Armstrong 

6 began his inspiring career in space exploration in 

7 Cleveland, Ohio, at what is now the NASA John H. 

8 Glenn Research Center. 

9 (3) Becoming the first human to land a space10 craft, and then set foot upon the moon, represents 

11 the greatest dream of any test pilot. 

12 (4) Therefore, it is fitting that the premier aer13 onautics and space test station in Ohio should be re14 named in his honor. 

15 SEC. 3. REDESIGNATION OF NASA JOHN H. GLENN RE16 SEARCH CENTER AT PLUM BROOK STATION, 

17 OHIO, AS NASA JOHN H. GLENN RESEARCH 

18 CENTER AT THE NEIL A. ARMSTRONG TEST 

19 FACILITY. 

20 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The NASA John H. Glenn 

21 Research Center at Plum Brook Station, Ohio, is hereby 

22 redesignated as the NASA John H. Glenn Research Cen23 ter at the Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility. 

24 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg25 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

26 States to the station referred to in subsection (a) shall 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4790 IH

1 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘NASA John H. Glenn 

2 Center at the Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility’’. 

3 (c) SAVINGS.—Nothing in this section shall be con4 strued to alter the relationship between the Plum Brook 

5 Station and the NASA John H. Glenn Research Center. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 18,127

 17,741

 18,194

 18,525

 17,095

 17,334

 15,698

 15,798

 15,336

 15,642

 15,193

 15,809

 16,644

 17,515

 18,061

 18,494

 18,566

 17,917

 14,747

 16,808

 16,454

 16,726

 17,191

 16,705

 16,380

 16,673

 15,716

 17,937

 17,615

 17,833

 18,863

 9,628

 8,944

 8,761

 8,447

 8,104

 8,581

 8,200

 7,532

 8,086

 8,886

 8,729

 8,345

 7,198

 8,028

 9,332

 8,785

 10,102

 8,270

 7,654

 6,712

 6,217

 7,073

 7,721

 7,708

 9,321

 8,901

 8,676

 8,761

 8,991

 8,435

 7,456

 13,053

 12,611

 12,909

 12,938

 12,428

 12,077

 11,645

 11,206

 11,569

 11,914

 11,833

 11,778

 11,924

 12,733

 13,434

 13,789

 14,095

 13,386

 11,564

 11,895

 11,187

 11,307

 12,315

 12,490

 12,731

 12,202

 12,460

 12,798

 12,765

 12,068

 11,994

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 2, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
# C_2014316EN.01000101.xml

| 16.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 316/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 316/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 September 2014

2014/C 316/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2911 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,48 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4442 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79495 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2329 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2099 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2750 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,579 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,53 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1980 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4139 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8584 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4311 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4313 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0071 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5812 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6336 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 341,07 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,2340 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9317 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6200 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 438,38 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1706 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,253 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 49,3255 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,683 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0186 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,0879 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,9211 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2911

JPY

Japanese yen

138,48

DKK

Danish krone

7,4442

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79495

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2329

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2099

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2750

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,579

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,53

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1980

RON

Romanian leu

4,4139

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8584

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4311

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4313

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0071

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5812

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6336

KRW

South Korean won

1 341,07

ZAR

South African rand

14,2340

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9317

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6200

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 438,38

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1706

PHP

Philippine peso

57,253

RUB

Russian rouble

49,3255

THB

Thai baht

41,683

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0186

MXN

Mexican peso

17,0879

INR

Indian rupee

78,9211

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
### **CHAPTER 212—MILITARY EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION**

Sec.
3261.
Criminal offenses committed by certain members of the Armed Forces and by persons employed by or accompanying the Armed Forces outside the United States.
3262.
Arrest and commitment.
3263.
Delivery to authorities of foreign countries.
3264.
Limitation on removal.
3265.
Initial proceedings.
3266.
Regulations.
3267.
Definitions.
### **[CHAPTER 314—REPEALED]**
**Exhibit 10.4**

----

Back to Contents

|   | ICI20 Manchester SquareLondon W1U 3AN      T. +44(0)20 7009 5000F. +44(0)20 7009 5001www.ici.com  |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

March 26, 2003

Securities and Exchange Commission  450 Fifth Street N.W.  Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

      The  certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange  Commission solely for the purpose of complying with section 1350 of Chapter  63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification is not to be deemed  filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and does not constitute  a part of the Annual Report on Form 20–F (the “Report”) accompanying  this letter.

      Brendan  R O’Neill, the Chief Executive and Timothy A Scott, the Chief Financial  Officer of Imperial Chemical Industries PLC, each certifies that, to the best  of his knowledge:

|   | 1.     | the Report fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                          |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | 2.     | the information contained in the Report      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results      of operations of Imperial Chemical Industries PLC. |

/s/ B R O’Neill  Name: Brendan R O’Neill  Chief Executive 

_/s/ T A Scott  Name: Timothy A Scott  Chief Financial Officer

|   | Imperial Chemical Industries PLC      Registered in England No. 218 0 19      Registered Office      20 Manchester Square      London W1U 3AN |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
EXHIBIT 32



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER/CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



I, Howard L. Ehler, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer of Imperial Industries, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



(i)

the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 30, 2005



/s/ Howard L. Ehler, Jr.

Howard L. Ehler, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer/

Chief Financial Officer



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
### §805. General rule for voluntarily negotiated agreements

Any rates or terms under this title that—

(1) are agreed to by participants to a proceeding under section 803(b)(3),

(2) are adopted by the Copyright Royalty Judges as part of a determination under this chapter, and

(3) are in effect for a period shorter than would otherwise apply under a determination pursuant to this chapter,

shall remain in effect for such period of time as would otherwise apply under such determination, except that the Copyright Royalty Judges shall adjust the rates pursuant to the voluntary negotiations to reflect national monetary inflation during the additional period the rates remain in effect.

(Added Pub. L. 108–419, §3(a), Nov. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2360.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior sections 805 to 810 were repealed by Pub. L. 103–198, §2(e), Dec. 17, 1993, 107 Stat. 2308.

Section 805, Pub. L. 94–553, title I, §101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2598, related to staff of Copyright Royalty Tribunal.

Section 806, Pub. L. 94–553, title I, §101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2598, related to administrative support of Tribunal.

Section 807, Pub. L. 94–553, title I, §101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2598, related to deduction of costs of proceedings involving distribution of royalty fees.

Section 808, Pub. L. 94–553, title I, §101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2598, related to reporting requirements of the Tribunal.

Section 809, Pub. L. 94–553, title I, §101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2598, related to effective date of final determinations of Tribunal.

Section 810, Pub. L. 94–553, title I, §101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2598, related to judicial review of final decisions of Tribunal.
§ 381.4 What regulations apply? The following regulations apply to the PAIR program: ( a ) The Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) as follows: ( 1 ) 34 CFR part 75 (Direct Grant Programs) for purposes of an award made under *§* § 381.20 or 381.22(a)(1).
( 2 ) 34 CFR part 76 (State-Administered Programs), if the appropriation for the PAIR program is equal to or greater than $5,500,000 and the eligible system is a State or local government agency, except for— ( i ) Section 76.103;
( ii ) Sections 76.125 through 76.137;
( iii ) Sections 76.300 through 76.401;
( iv ) Section 76.704;
( v ) Section 76.734; and
( vi ) Section 76.740.
( 3 ) 34 CFR part 77 (Definitions that Apply to Department Regulations).
( 4 ) 34 CFR part 79 (Intergovernmental Review of Department of Education Programs and Activities).
( 5 ) 34 CFR part 81 (General Education Provisions Act—Enforcement).
( 6 ) 34 CFR part 82 (New Restrictions on Lobbying).
( b ) 2 CFR part 180 (OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement)), as adopted at 2 CFR part 3485.
( c ) 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards), as adopted at 2 CFR part 3474.
( d ) The regulations in this part 381.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 509 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 794e)
#### § 280.4 Data concerning cost of transportation.

Within five days after request therefor, transportation companies shall furnish to the district director or the Associate Commissioner for Examinations, or the Director for the National Fines Office pertinent information contained in the original transportation contract of all rejected aliens whose cases are within the purview of any of the provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act relating to refund of passage monies, and shall specify the exact amounts paid for transportation from the initial point of departure (which point shall be indicated) to the foreign port of embarkation, from the latter to the port of arrival in the United States and from the port of arrival to the inland point of destination, respectively, and also the amount paid for headtax, if any.

[22 FR 9807, Dec. 6, 1957, as amended at 54 FR 18649, May 2, 1989]
### Page 1 of 3 Disposition Comments Docket No: 

### FAA
- 2011
- 015 2 SNPRM Directorate ID: 

### 20 1 0
-NM
- 0 79
- AD Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.
Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA
- IR
- M
- 8040.1C Chapter 9. ISSUE 1: Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If PARTIALLY AGREE , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If NO , we don’t agree because ISSUE 2 : Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If PARTIALLY AGREE , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD: If NO , we don’t agree because

### Page 2 of 3

For additional issues, do uble - click here

### Page 3 of 3 S ignature Section Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.:

ASE Date

Branch Manager Date
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 4, 2011 

Order 

 

February 4, 2011 

139505 (140) 

TARA KATHERINE HAMED, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 139505 

v COA: 278017 

Wayne CC: 03-327525-NZ 

WAYNE COUNTY and WAYNE COUNTY 

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, 

Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

SERGEANT KENNETH DAWWISH, 

CORPORAL NETTI JACKSON, SHERIFF 

WARREN C. EVANS, and DEPUTY 

REGINALD JOHNSON, 

 Defendants. 

____________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by the Women Lawyers of Michigan for 

leave to file a brief amicus curiae is considered and it is granted.
#### Mary J. Carl, Appellee, v. Patrick W. Loftus et al., Appeal of Patrick W. Loftus, Appellant.

Gen. No. 15,007.

Appeals and *errors—what not considered upon review of refusal to vacate judgment.*Upon such an appeal alleged errors at the trial or defects in the declaration will not be considered.

Trespass on the case. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Robert W. Weight, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1908.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 28, 1910.

Statement by the Court. In an action of trespass on the case against three defendants, one only, the appellant here, was served with process. All of them, however, pleaded the general issue.

When the case was called for trial, defendants did not appear, and after an *ex parte*hearing before a jury, a verdict of $1,000 was returned against one defendant, the appellant here. The record recites that “issues being joined as to Patrick W. Loftus, it is ordered that a jury come,” etc. The record shows no disposition made of the issues between plaintiff and the other defendants. Judgment was rendered against Patrick W. Loftus alone, at the same term of court. At the second term thereafter, the appellant moved the court to set aside the judgment. From a denial of this motion an appeal was prayed and allowed»

*430John J. Swenie and T. F. Monahan, for appellant.

A. W. Briokwoob, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Mack

delivered the opinion of the court.

The court had jurisdiction of the parties and the subject-matter. Its judgment therefore was not a nullity; it was valid until reversed. After the term, the court was powerless to set aside the judgment, even if this defendant’s attorney, contrary to the facts in this case, had known nothing of the verdict and so had been unable to move for a new trial during the term. The court therefore did not err in refusing to vacate the judgment.

It would he improper on this appeal from the order refusing to vacate a judgment to consider the alleged errors at the trial or defects in the declaration.

The appeal was not and could not after the term have been allowed from the original judgment. The remedy to correct any errors therein is by writ of error.

*Affirmed.*
### §833f. Purchase of supplies and services

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, all purchases and contracts made by the Bureau or the Secretary of the Army for supplies or for services, except for personal services, shall be made after advertising, in such manner and at such times, sufficiently in advance of opening bids, as the Bureau or Secretary of the Army, as the case may be, shall determine to be adequate to insure notice and opportunity for competition. Such advertisement shall not be required, however, when (1) an emergency requires immediate delivery of the supplies or performance of the services; or (2) repair parts, accessories, supplemental equipment, or services are required for supplies or services previously furnished or contracted for; or (3) the aggregate amount involved in any purchase of supplies or procurement of services does not exceed $500; in which cases such purchase of supplies or procurement of services may be made in the open market in the manner common among businessmen. In comparing bids and in making awards, the Bureau or the Secretary of the Army, as the case may be, may consider such factors as relative quality and adaptability of supplies or services, the bidder's financial responsibility, skill, experience, record of integrity in dealing, and ability to furnish repairs and maintenance services, the time of delivery or performance offered, and whether the bidder has complied with the specifications.

(May 18, 1938, ch. 250, §7, 52 Stat. 406; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued military Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.

#### Transfer of Functions

Power marketing functions of Bureau of Reclamation, including construction, operation, and maintenance of transmission lines and attendant facilities, transferred to Secretary of Energy by section 7152(a)(1)(E), (3) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, and are to be exercised by Secretary through a separate Administration within Department of Energy.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.