alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          12,386
<SECURITIES>                                       614
<RECEIVABLES>                                  322,583
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,092
<INVENTORY>                                    148,656
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               489,727
<PP&E>                                         284,270
<DEPRECIATION>                                 169,293
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,158,529
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          334,288
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,162
<OTHER-SE>                                     305,623
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,158,529
<SALES>                                        399,094
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               399,094
<CGS>                                          149,857
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  248,043
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,846
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,776
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                138,429
<INCOME-TAX>                                    55,372
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             83,057
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    83,057
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.34
        

</TABLE>
# EXHIBIT 32.2

# SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION
906 CERTIFICATIONS

CERTIFICATION OF MICHAEL A. CREEL, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS GP, LLC THE GENERAL PARTNER OF
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS OPERATING L.P. AND ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.

In
connection with the combined quarterly report of Enterprise Products Partners L.P. and
Enterprise Products Operating L.P. (collectively, the Registrants) on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael A. Creel,
Chief Financial Officer of Enterprise Products GP, LLC, the General Partner of the
Registrants, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrants.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|       |                                                       
|------ | ------------------------------------------------------
|       | /s/ Michael A. Creel                                  
|Name:  | Michael A. Creel                                      
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer of Enterprise Products GP, LLC
|       | on behalf of Enterprise Products Operating L.P. and   
|       | Enterprise Products Partners L.P.                     
|       |                                                       
|Date:  | November 13, 2003                                     

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrants and will be
retained by the Registrants and furnished to Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



---
### §445. Canyon De Chelly National Monument; establishment; boundaries

With the consent of the tribal council of the Navajo Tribe of Indians, the President of the United States is authorized to establish by presidential proclamation the Canyon De Chelly National Monument, within the Navajo Indian Reservation, Arizona, including the lands hereinafter described.

All lands in Del Muerto, De Chelly, and Monument Canyons, in the canyons tributary thereto, and the lands within one-half mile of the rims of the said canyons, situated in unsurveyed townships 4 and 5 north, range 7 west; townships 4, 5, and 6 north, range 8 west; townships 4 and 5 north, range 9 west; and in surveyed townships 4 and 5 north, range 6 west; townships 3, 6, and 7 north, range 7 west; township 6 north, range 9 west; and township 5 north, range 10 west; embracing about eighty-three thousand eight hundred and forty acres, all of the Navajo meridian, in Arizona.

(Feb. 14, 1931, ch. 188, §1, 46 Stat. 1161; Mar. 1, 1933, ch. 161, 47 Stat. 1419.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1933—Act Mar. 1, 1933, redescribed lands referred to in second par.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Establishment of Monument; Boundaries

Monument and boundaries established by Presidential Proc. No. 1945, Apr. 1, 1931, 47 Stat. 2448; Proc. No. 2036, Mar. 3, 1933, 47 Stat. 2562.
Carpooling (autos compartidos)

Estas son maneras para ayudar a prevenir la 

propagación del COVID-19 cuando vaya en auto 

compartido:

USAR 

MASCARILLAS en 

autos compartidos

Dejar entrar AIRE FRESCO

por LAS VENTANAS o LAS 

REJILLAS DE VENTILACIÓN

CUBRIRSE LA NARIZ Y 

LA BOCA AL TOSER y

ESTORNUDAR

LIMPIAR y

DESINFECTAR las 

superficies con frecuencia

LIMITAR

LA CANTIDAD 

de personas

LAVAR O DESINFECTAR 

LAS MANOS 

adecuadamente

IR al trabajo

CON las MISMAS 

PERSONAS

Mantener al menos 6 PIES 

(2m) DE LOS DEMÁS 

mientras espera el auto

Si está enfermo o tuvo contacto cercano con una persona con 

COVID-19, quédese en casa, excepto para buscar atención médica.

Para obtener más información sobre cómo mantenerse seguro en 

el trabajo, visite cdc.gov/coronavirus-es

6 pies 

(2m)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7783 

ALBERT LEE EVANS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

E. RICHARD BAZZLE, Warden; HENRY MCMASTER,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-04-124)

Submitted: March 24, 2005 Decided: March 30, 2005

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albert Lee Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Derrick K. McFarland, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Albert Lee Evans, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order rejecting the magistrate judge’s

recommendation and denying relief on his petition filed under 28

U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final

order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims

addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 338

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude that Evans has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-80,431-01

EX PARTE KEVIN WADE NOONKESTER, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W10809-1 IN THE 355 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HOOD COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of sexual assault

of a child and sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. The Second Court of Appeals dismissed his

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Noonkester v. State, No. 02-11-00198-CR (Tex. App.–Ft.Worth June

30, 2011).

Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to

timely file a notice of appeal. We remanded this application to the trial court for findings of fact and

conclusions of law.
2

The trial court has determined that counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. We find

that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of

conviction in Cause No. W10809-1 from the 355 District Court of Hood County. Applicant is th

ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he may then,

with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion,

the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to

be represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to represent

Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed

on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to

prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court

within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. 

Delivered: March 12, 2014

Do not publish
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 91104 / February 11, 2021

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-20173

In the Matter of

Mancera, S.C., Alejandro Valdez

Mendoza, C.P., and Angel Radames 

Corral Nieblas, C.P.

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

EXTENSION ORDER

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested an extension of time until 

August 31, 2021 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution under Rule 1101(a) of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(a).

On December 17, 2020, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Administrative 

and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Pursuant to Sections 4C and 21C of the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 102(e) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, Making 

Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”)1against 

Mancera, S.C. (the Mexican member firm of Ernst & Young Global), and two members of its 

engagement team, then-partner, Alejandro Valdez Mendoza, C.P., and then-senior manager, 

Angel Radames Corral Nieblas, C.P. (collectively, the “Respondents”). In the Order, the 

Commission found improper professional conduct and violations of the federal securities laws 

by the Respondents during Mancera’s audits of the 2010, 2011 and 2012 financial statements 

of Desarrolladora Homex, SAB de CV, a homebuilder headquartered in Sinaloa, Mexico. 

Among other things, the Commission ordered Mancera to pay $950,000 in disgorgement, 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 90699 (Dec. 17, 2020).
2

$139,926.43 in prejudgment interest, and $500,000 in civil money penalties to the 

Commission. The Commission also created a Fair Fund, pursuant to Section 308(a) of the 

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, so the penalty, along with the disgorgement and prejudgment 

interest, collected can be distributed to investors harmed by the Respondent’s conduct 

described in the Order. The Order further provided that the Fair Fund may be added to or 

combined with any other fund created in a related action arising out of the same investigative 

matter.

In its request for an extension of time, the Division states that it needs time to solicit 

and evaluate fund administrator proposals, develop the distribution methodology, and develop 

the plan of distribution. 

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s 

request for an extension of time until August 31, 2021 to submit a Proposed Plan of 

Distribution is granted.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority. 

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
§ 655.605 Project procedures. ( a ) *Federal-aid highways.* Federal-aid projects involving the installation of traffic control devices shall follow procedures as established in 23 CFR part 630, subpart A, Federal-Aid Programs Approval and Project Authorization. Simplified and timesaving procedures are to be used to the extent permitted by existing policy.
( b ) *Off-system highways.* Certain federally funded programs are available for installation of traffic control devices on streets and highways that are not on the Federal-aid system. The procedures used in these programs may vary from project to project but, essentially, the guidelines set forth herein should be used.
### §460iii–1. Definitions

As used in this subchapter:

(1) The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Interior.

(2) The term "conservation area" means the Morley Nelson Snake River Birds of Prey National Conservation Area established by section 460iii–2 of this title.

(3) The term "raptor" or "raptors" means individuals or populations of eagles, falcons, owls, hawks, and other birds of prey.

(4) The term "raptor habitat" includes the habitat of the raptor prey base as well as the nesting and hunting habitat of raptors within the conservation area.

(5) The term "Memorandum of Understanding" means the Memorandum of Understanding #ID–237, dated May 1985, between the State of Idaho Military Division and the Bureau of Land Management.

(6) The term "Orchard Training Area" means that area generally so depicted on the map referred to in section 460iii–2(b) of this title, and as described in the Memorandum of Understanding as well as the air space over the same.

(7) The term "Impact Area" means that area which was used for the firing of live artillery projectiles and is used for live fire ranges of all types and, therefore, poses a danger to public safety and which is generally so depicted on the map referred to in section 460iii–2(b) of this title.

(8) The term "Artillery Impact Area" means that area within the Impact Area into which live projectiles are fired, which is generally described as that area labeled as such on the map referred to in section 460iii–2(b) of this title.

(9) The term "the plan" means the comprehensive management plan developed for the conservation area, dated August 30, 1985, together with such revisions thereto as may be required in order to implement this subchapter.

(10) The term "hydroelectric facilities" means all facilities related to the generation, transmission, and distribution of hydroelectric power and which are subject to, and authorized by, a license(s), and any and all amendments thereto, issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

(Pub. L. 103–64, §2, Aug. 4, 1993, 107 Stat. 304; Pub. L. 111–11, title II, §2301(a)(1), Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1101.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2009—Par. (2). Pub. L. 111–11 inserted "Morley Nelson" before "Snake River Birds of Prey National Conservation Area".
#### § 200.69 [Reserved]
### **CHAPTER 205—SEARCHES AND SEIZURES**

Sec.
3101.
Effect of rules of court—Rule.
3102.
Authority to issue search warrant—Rule.
3103.
Grounds for issuing search warrant—Rule.
3103a.
Additional grounds for issuing warrant.
3104.
Issuance of search warrant; contents—Rule.
3105.
Persons authorized to serve search warrant.
3106.
Officer authorized to serve search warrant—Rule.
3107.
Service of warrants and seizures by Federal Bureau of Investigation.
3108.
Execution, service, and return—Rule.
3109.
Breaking doors or windows for entry or exit.
3110.
Property defined—Rule.
3111.
Property seizable on search warrant—Rule.
[3112.
Repealed.]
3113.
Liquor violations in Indian country.
3114.
Return of seized property and suppression of evidence; motion—Rule.
3115.
Inventory upon execution and return of search warrant—Rule.
3116.
Records of examining magistrate judge; return to clerk of court—Rule.
3117.
Mobile tracking devices.
3118.
Implied consent for certain tests.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 90–351 enacted section 3103a of this title as part of chapter 204, and Pub. L. 90–462, §3, Aug. 8, 1968, 82 Stat. 638, corrected the chapter designation from 204 to 205.

#### Amendments

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXV, §3573(d), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4929, struck out item 3112 "Search warrants for seizure of animals, birds, or eggs" and renumbered item 3117, "Implied consent for certain tests", as 3118.

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–690, title VI, §6477(b)(2), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4381, added item 3117 "Implied consent for certain tests".

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–508, title I, §108(b), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1858, added item 3117 "Mobile tracking devices".

**1968**—Pub. L. 90–351, title IX, §1401(b), June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 238, added item 3103a.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Words "magistrate judge" substituted for "magistrate" in item 3116 pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as a note under section 631 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
```

[114th Congress Public Law 240]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 974]]

Public Law 114-240
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To amend title 36, United States Code, to encourage the nationwide 
observance of two minutes of silence each Veterans Day. <<NOTE: Oct. 7, 
                          2016 -  [S. 1004]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Veterans Day 
Moment of Silence Act.>> 
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 36 USC 101 note.>>  SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Day Moment of Silence Act''.
SEC. 2. OBSERVANCE OF VETERANS DAY.

    (a) Two Minutes of Silence.--Chapter 1 of title 36, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 145. <<NOTE: President. Proclamation. 36 USC 145.>>  
                Veterans Day

    ``The President shall issue each year a proclamation calling on the 
people of the United States to observe two minutes of silence on 
Veterans Day in honor of the service and sacrifice of veterans 
throughout the history of the Nation, beginning at--
            ``(1) 3:11 p.m. Atlantic standard time;
            ``(2) 2:11 p.m. eastern standard time;
            ``(3) 1:11 p.m. central standard time;
            ``(4) 12:11 p.m. mountain standard time;
            ``(5) 11:11 a.m. Pacific standard time;
            ``(6) 10:11 a.m. Alaska standard time; and
            ``(7) 9:11 a.m. Hawaii-Aleutian standard time.''.

[[Page 130 STAT. 975]]

    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 1 of 
title 36, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new item:

``145. Veterans Day.''.

    Approved October 7, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1004:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 161 (2015):
                                    Nov. 9, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.
                                                        Vol. 162 (2016):
                                    Sept. 27, considered and passed 
                                        House.

                                  <all>
```
### §831k–1. Extension of credit to States, municipalities and nonprofit organizations to assist in operation of existing facilities

In order (1) to facilitate the disposition of the surplus power of the Corporation according to the policies set forth in this chapter; (2) to give effect to the priority herein accorded to States, counties, municipalities, and nonprofit organizations in the purchase of such power by enabling them to acquire facilities for the distribution of such power; and (3) at the same time to preserve existing distribution facilities as going concerns and avoid duplication of such facilities, the Board is authorized to advise and cooperate with and assist, by extending credit for a period of not exceeding five years to, States, counties, municipalities and nonprofit organizations situated within transmission distance from any dam where such power is generated by the Corporation in acquiring, improving, and operating (a) existing distribution facilities and incidental works, including generating plants; and (b) interconnecting transmission lines; or in acquiring any interest in such facilities, incidental works, and lines.

(May 18, 1933, ch. 32, §12a, as added Aug. 31, 1935, ch. 836, §7, 49 Stat. 1076.)