alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §695c. Availability of funds for construction of dams, buildings, etc., for California refuge

Funds made available under sections 695 to 695c of this title or any other Act for the administration, maintenance, and development of any areas acquired under said sections, shall be available also for the construction of dams, dikes, ditches, buildings, and other necessary improvements and for the purchase, planting, growing, and harvesting of grains and other crops for the feeding of waterfowl and other wildlife frequenting the localities where such lands may be purchased or rented.

(May 18, 1948, ch. 303, §4, 62 Stat. 239.)
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         OF FLAG TELECOM GROUP LIMITED

    This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on
Form 10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for the three months ended June 30, 2003 of FLAG
Telecom Group Limited (the "Issuer").

    I, Alexander Gersh, the Chief Financial Officer of Issuer certify that:

    (i) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
        or 78o(d)); and

    (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Issuer.

    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and
will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: August 14, 2003.

<Table>
<S>                                               <C>    <C>
                                                  /s/ ALEXANDER GERSH
                                                  --------------------------------------------------
                                                  Name:  Alexander Gersh
</Table>
### §460nnn–71. Designation of streams for wild and scenic river status in Steens Mountain Area

#### (a), (b) Omitted

#### (c) Management

Where management requirements for a stream segment described in the amendments made by this section differ between the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1271 et seq.) and the Wilderness Area, the more restrictive requirements shall apply.

(Pub. L. 106–399, title III, §301, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1667.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

For the amendments made by this section, referred to in subsec. (c), see Codification note below.

The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, referred to in subsec. (c), is Pub. L. 90–542, Oct. 2, 1968, 82 Stat. 906, which is classified generally to chapter 28 (§1271 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1271 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 301 of Pub. L. 106–399. Subsecs. (a) and (b) of section 301 of Pub. L. 106–399 amended section 1274 of this title.
#### § 206.40 What restrictions are there on expenditures?

Funds provided under HEP or CAMP may not be used for construction activities, other than minor construction-related activities such as the repair or minor remodeling or alteration of facilities.

(Authority: Sec. 418A(a); 20 U.S.C. 1070d-2)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph Indorsky, Appellant.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ.
#### The City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. James Murnell, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 15,284.

*Ordinances—when conviction of violation reversed.*If the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction the judgment will he reversed and the cause remanded.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Michael F. Girten, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1909.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed January 6, 1911.

Charles E. Erbstein, for plaintiff in error.

George H. White, for defendant in error; Henry M. Seligman, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.

James Murnell, plaintiff in error, was arrested on November 25,1908, charged with violating section 1454 of the Revised Municipal Code of Chicago of 1905; and on December 3,1908, was fined $100 and costs. On December 30, 1908, this writ of error was sued out to reverse the judgment.

Upon a careful consideration of the evidence we are of the opinion that it is insufficient to make out a case against plaintiff in error, even if we are to take judicial notice of the ordinance of the city of Chicago set out in defendant in error’s brief under the provisions of the Municipal Court Act, which we do not find it necessary to decide in view of our conclusion on the evidence. The evidence fails to show a violation of the ordinance. The judgment has no support in the evidence other than suspicion, and must be reversed.

*Reversed and remanded.*

Mr. Justice Baldwin took no part in the decision of this case.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

In Re: 

Ebony Joyran Ross Case # 19-10402-BFK 

REPORT OF DEPOSIT OF UNCLAIMED FUNDS 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3011 and 11 U.S.C. 347, the trustee 

herein submits a check, or checks, payable to the “Clerk, United States Bankruptcy Court” 

representing unclaimed funds to be deposited by the Clerk of the Court into the Treasury 

of the United States. Said funds are subject to withdrawal as provided by 28 U.S.C. 2042 

and shall not escheat under any state law. Unclaimed funds represent the dividend(s) due 

and payable to the entity identified as the original payee on the face of the enclosed 

check(s). 

PAYEE 

EBONY JOYRAN ROSS 

28 Hopkins Branch Way 

Fredericksburg, VA 22406 

AMOUNT 

$1,433.13 

Dated: February 12, 2020 __/s/Thomas P. Gorman ___________ 

Thomas P. Gorman 

300 North Washington Street, Ste. 400 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

(703) 836-2226 

VSB#26421 

Case 19-10402-BFK Doc 75 Filed 02/12/20 Entered 02/12/20 10:34:03 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
389 P.2d 20

#### George TRUJILLO, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, NEW MEXICO PAROLE BOARD, and The State of New Mexico, Respondents.

No. 49 HC.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Jan. 31, 1964.

COMPTON, Chief Justice, and CARMODY, CHAVEZ, NOBLE and MOISE, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that the petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is hereby denied for failure to state a cause of action in petition.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Ex12b
                               Idaho Power Company
                       Consolidated Financial Information
Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends Requirements



                                            Twelve Months Ended December 31,
                                                 (Thousands of Dollars)
                                          1997         1998      1999        2000           2001

                                  <c>          <c>          <c>         <c>         <c>
Earnings, as defined:
  Income from continuing operations
  before  income taxes               $  135,908    $ 133,021   $ 119,872   $ 128,139   $    48,250
  Adjust for distributed income of
     equity investees                    (3,943)      (4,697)       (837)     (3,116)       (1,620)
  Equity in loss of equity method
     investments                              0          476           0           0             0
  Minority interest in losses of
  majority owned subsidiaries                 0         (125)          0           0             0
  Fixed charges, as below                61,743       61,394      62,969      58,833        64,964

     Total earnings, as defined      $  193,708    $ 190,069   $ 182,004   $ 183,856   $   111,594

Fixed charges, as defined:
  Interest charges                   $   60,761    $  60,593   $  62,014   $  57,797   $    64,002
  Rental interest factor                    982          801         955       1,036           962

     Total fixed charges                 61,743       61,394      62,969      58,833        64,964

  Preferred stock dividends-gross
  up Idaho Power rate                     7,803        8,275       8,133       9,564         9,033

     Total combined fixed charges
     and preferred dividends         $   69,546    $  69,669   $  71,102   $  68,397   $    73,997

Ratio of earnings to combined fixed
charges and preferred dividends           2.79x        2.73x       2.56x       2.69x          1.51x
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of VisualMED Clinical
Solutions (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30th, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Larry Kurlender, Principal Financial Officer, Principal
Accounting Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|                                                                                                                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) The
  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and      
|                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) The
  information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                                                                                              
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Larry Kurlender                                                                          
| |                                                                                              
| | Larry
  Kurlender
  Principal Financial Officer, Principal
  Accounting Officer and Treasurer
| |                                                                                              
| | November 13th
  2006                                                                         

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78r), as amended.

---
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70 -68

36 38 40 42 44



### ★ ▲ ▲

▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 1000 1500 2000 2500 1000 18 12 06 00 05/30 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 4,966

 5,227

 4,848

 10,919

 10,173

 10,086

 10,155

 9,527

 9,173

 9,541

 10,239

 10,251

 9,382

 10,719

 11,510

 13,096

 14,618

 15,066

 14,805

 14,741

 13,119

 12,452

 11,623

 10,771

 9,862

 9,745

 11,071

 12,731

 13,030

 13,218

 14,611

 1,345

 1,334

 1,303

 1,509

 3,626

 2,283

 2,055

 1,905

 1,531

 1,809

 2,800

 2,732

 2,788

 3,547

 3,468

 3,923

 4,166

 4,234

 4,674

 4,810

 5,192

 4,517

 3,836

 3,296

 3,271

 3,737

 4,109

 4,636

 3,564

 3,324

 4,953

 2,901

 2,944

 2,739

 5,284

 6,650

 6,120

 5,855

 5,638

 5,142

 5,922

 6,755

 6,235

 6,366

 6,584

 7,274

 7,901

 8,322

 8,555

 9,099

 9,303

 8,869

 8,151

 7,089

 6,779

 6,485

 6,410

 6,949

 7,853

 8,236

 8,372

 8,928

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 7, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
# Amtsblatt C 23A/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2407
  doi:10.3000/17252407.CA2010.023.ger |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 23A |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 53. Jahrgang30. Januar 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2407

doi:10.3000/17252407.CA2010.023.ger

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 23A

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

53. Jahrgang30. Januar 2010

---

| Informationsnummer | Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Berichtigungen |
| 2010/C 023A/01 | Berichtigung der Ausschreibung der Stelle des Exekutivdirektors (m/w) (Besoldungsgruppe AD14) der Europäischen Arzneimittel-Agentur (EMEA) (ABl. C 9 A vom 15.1.2010) | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Inhalt

Seite

Berichtigungen

Berichtigungen

2010/C 023A/01

Berichtigung der Ausschreibung der Stelle des Exekutivdirektors (m/w) (Besoldungsgruppe AD14) der Europäischen Arzneimittel-Agentur (EMEA) (ABl. C 9 A vom 15.1.2010)

1

ÜBERSICHT DER IM C A-AMTSBLATT VERÖFFENTLICHTEN AUSWAHLVERFAHREN

Anbei finden Sie eine Liste der C A-Amtsblätter, die im Jahr 2010 bisher veröffentlicht wurden.

Die Amtsblätter sind — wenn nicht anders angegeben — in allen Sprachfassungen erschienen.

| 5 | (FR) |
| --- | --- |
| 9 | |
| 19 | (FR) |
| 23 | (DE/ES/PT) |

5

(FR)

9

19

(FR)

23

(DE/ES/PT)

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

Berichtigungen

Berichtigungen

| 30.1.2010 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 23/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 23/1

---

Berichtigung der Ausschreibung der Stelle des Exekutivdirektors (m/w) (Besoldungsgruppe AD14) der Europäischen Arzneimittel-Agentur (EMEA)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 9 A vom 15. Januar 2010
  )

(2010/C 23 A/01)

Seite 2, Rubrik „Bewerberprofil“:

anstatt:

| „— | der unten genannte Hochschulabschluss sollte idealerweise in den Fächern Physik, Pharmazie oder Veterinärmedizin erworben worden sein;“ |
| --- | --- |

„—

der unten genannte Hochschulabschluss sollte idealerweise in den Fächern Physik, Pharmazie oder Veterinärmedizin erworben worden sein;“

muss es heißen:

| „— | der unten genannte Hochschulabschluss sollte idealerweise in den Fächern Medizin, Pharmazie oder Veterinärmedizin erworben worden sein;“. |
| --- | --- |

„—

der unten genannte Hochschulabschluss sollte idealerweise in den Fächern Medizin, Pharmazie oder Veterinärmedizin erworben worden sein;“.

---
Exhibit 32.1     DAC TECHNOLOGIES GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) ORRULE 15d-14(c) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350     Inconnection with this First Amendment to the Quarterly Report on Form10-QSB/A-1 of DAC Technologies Group InternationalInc (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), David A. Collins, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.              /s/ David A. Collins   David A. Collins, Chairman, CEO and Principal Executive Officer      Date:August 16, 2007
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7862

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TONNIE FLOYD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:13-cr-00047-DKC-1; 8:16-cv-01953-

DKC)

Submitted: March 23, 2022 Decided: May 4, 2022

Before DIAZ and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paresh S. Patel, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Greenbelt, 

Maryland, for Appellant.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tonnie Floyd seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district court denies relief on the merits, a movant 

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 

759, 773-74 (2017).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Floyd has not made 

the requisite showing in light of our recent decision in United States v. Crawley, 2 F.4th 

(4th Cir. 2021). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
§ 90.65 Application content. ( a ) *Format.* Applications from eligible entities must be submitted as described in the relevant program solicitation developed by the Office on Violence Against Women and must include all the information required by 42 U.S.C. 3796hh-1(a).
( b ) *Certification.* Each eligible applicant must certify that all the information contained in the application is correct. All submissions will be treated as a material representation of fact upon which reliance will be placed, and any false or incomplete representation may result in suspension or termination of funding, recovery of funds provided, and civil and/or criminal sanctions.
§ 222.156 How is an administrative hearing conducted? Administrative hearings under this subpart are conducted as follows: ( a ) The administrative hearing is conducted by an ALJ appointed under 5 U.S.C. 3105, who issues rules of procedure that are proper and not inconsistent with this subpart.
( b ) The parties may introduce all relevant evidence on the issues stated in the applicant's request for hearing or on other issues determined by the ALJ during the proceeding. The application in question and all amendments and exhibits must be made part of the hearing record.
( c ) Technical rules of evidence, including the Federal Rules of Evidence, do not apply to hearings conducted under this subpart, but the ALJ may apply rules designed to assure production of the most credible evidence available, including allowing the cross-examination of witnesses.
( d ) Each party may examine all documents and other evidence offered or accepted for the record, and may have the opportunity to refute facts and arguments advanced on either side of the issues.
( e ) A transcript must be made of the oral evidence unless the parties agree otherwise.
( f ) Each party may be represented by counsel.
( g ) The ALJ is bound by all applicable statutes and regulations and may neither waive them nor rule them invalid.
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 556 and 3105; 20 U.S.C. 7711(a))
[60 FR 50778, Sept. 29, 1995, as amended at 62 FR 35419, July 1, 1997]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     The accompanying financial information has been extracted from unaudited
financial statements as of June 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          40,366
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  122,257
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               162,623
<PP&E>                                         162,856
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,892
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 578,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,233,311
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,220
<OTHER-SE>                                   (663,095)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   578,436
<SALES>                                        449,971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               449,971
<CGS>                                          329,123
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  329,123
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               662,651
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,510
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (568,313)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (568,313)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 94,090
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (474,223)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)


</TABLE>
!"

 #	
 

$%
 

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

	 !!



  	  "#$#%&'

'()	
(*
##	
 

+,-
./
(,-0
(.,$



11
	2
#	3%4	*5(
3	(/*
#$%
+(

()/	(	/	)	33

3	
)
(*	)(63(
(6	
(
#	
4
	%	))%
#
,-7
.

	)(
		(6
#	
	)	)5	

(*
#0
(#	%6(2	)
#	
*
#


((		)(
		(6
#	

#(6)	)**((
	
6	

#0
(

	)
#
#	2(6#3)	#	(68		9::!
()
#0
(;

<=>=$=$<

#0
((?=$

#
(	
#(@)
33
#7
*
#/*A::::::%4	*	

5(
3	(/))(

4(
#
#	3
	
%
4
#
	)(?4(

#
(	
#(@)

	
	33		)		%3	
(
//	

#

	3

<8	?3)B		C 

$	2()0	8B		! 1 

D>0'DD=DE=>=>'?<DD7

:
(

(2F(
C::

F	#(6
$:::

,: !::

3

##	
 


GH1!19C91!1G

Case 16-12768-BFK Doc 54 Filed 02/06/18 Entered 02/06/18 16:31:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
#(>)#	33%**
(2(//)(	
3	)#	33
%%I


#1)	
	

2())()	3=3*	
7)::1,#	
#	3(	%3
	

$	
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&           

(	"

'(
)
	
	
8)6

7=7=$

D>0'DD=DE=>=>'?<DD7

:
(

(2F(
C::

F	#(6
$:::

3: !::

	J: !:

 KK$	2()0	8

<8	?3)B		C 

$	2()0	8B		! 1 

		

	

	



KK=%
	)
,%$04(
#	
#(
&&&&&

=%
	)
BH1C

#D	4>**(*=%
	)


L9"(6



3J	)(	B91

, :991 99:

, :9C19;*	J

%	)
M%	)
3	4*(//

		
	


GH1!19C91!1G

Feb 6 2018 /s/ Brian F. Kenney

Entered on Docket: February 6, 2018

Case 16-12768-BFK Doc 54 Filed 02/06/18 Entered 02/06/18 16:31:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
=>7'='>D>D='DC:$>=0

<==
#	
 	33 	 	
( #	2 ))
# 	%2*)

>)

KK$	2()0	8

$	2()0	8

GH1!19C91!1G

Case 16-12768-BFK Doc 54 Filed 02/06/18 Entered 02/06/18 16:31:22 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
#### § 300.27 Limited English proficient.

*Limited English proficient* has the meaning given the term 'English learner' in section 8101 of the ESEA.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1401(18))

[71 FR 46753, Aug. 14, 2006, as amended at 82 FR 29759, June 30, 2017]
#### George Grattan, Respondent, v. Thomas F. Doherty, Appellant.

Motion granted, unless printed papers be served within thirty days, which appellant may do upon payment of ten dollars for opening his default and ten dollars costs of motion, in which ease motion is denied.