alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Newsroom        - Press Releases
      - Public Statements
      - Speeches
      - Testimony
      - Spotlight Topics
      - Media Gallery
      - Upcoming Events
      - Webcasts
      - What's New
      - SEC Videos
      - Reports and Publications
      - RSS Feeds
      - Social Media 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

**FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:** 85 FR 69375, 2 November 2020

**PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:** Wednesday, November 4, 2020 at 2:00 p.m.

**CHANGES IN THE MEETING:** The following item will not be considered during the Open Meeting on Wednesday, November 4, 2020:

2. The Commission will consider whether to issue an order granting exemptive relief from Sections 8 and 15(a)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 3b-13(b)(2), 8c-1, 10b-10, 15a-1 and 15c2-1 thereunder in connection with the revision of the definition of "security" to encompass security-based swaps; declining to extend exemptive relief from Rules 10b-16 and 15c2-5; and determining the expiration date for a temporary exemption from Section 29(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with registration of security-based swap dealers and major security-based swap participants.

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:** For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: November 2, 2020

Vanessa A. CountrymanSecretary
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

IN RE: John Paul Rapier CASE NO: 18-12579

Chapter: 7

DECLARATION OF MAILING

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On 1/30/2019, I did cause a copy of the following documents, described below,

Notice of Motion

Motion to Avoid Judician Liens

to be served for delivery by the United States Postal Service, via First Class United States Mail, postage prepaid, with

sufficient postage thereon to the parties listed on the mailing matrix exhibit, a copy of which is attached hereto and

incorporated as if fully set forth herein.

I caused these documents to be served by utilizing the services of BK Attorney Services, LLC d/b/a certificateofservice.com,

an Approved Bankruptcy Notice Provider authorized by the United States Courts Administrative Office, pursuant to Fed.R.

Bankr.P. 9001(9) and 2002(g)(4). A copy of the declaration of service is attached hereto and incorporated as if fully set forth

herein.

Parties who are participants in the Courts Electronic Noticing System ("NEF"), if any, were denoted as having been served

electronically with the documents described herein per the ECF/PACER system.

DATED: 1/30/2019

/s/ Ashvin Pandurangi

Ashvin Pandurangi 86966

AP Law Group, PLC

7777 Leesburg Pike, Suite 402N

Falls Church, VA 22043-0000

571 969 6540

Case 18-12579-BFK Doc 26 Filed 01/30/19 Entered 01/30/19 12:17:27 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
IN RE: John Paul Rapier CASE NO: 18-12579

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

DECLARATION OF MAILING

Chapter: 7

On 1/30/2019, a copy of the following documents, described below,

Notice of Motion

Motion to Avoid Judician Liens

were deposited for delivery by the United States Postal Service, via First Class United States Mail, postage prepaid, with sufficient postage thereon

to the parties listed on the mailing matrix exhibit, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated as if fully set forth herein.

The undersigned does hereby declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States that I have served the above referenced document

(s) on the mailing list attached hereto in the manner shown and prepared the Declaration of Certificate of Service and that it is true and correct to

the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.

DATED: 1/30/2019

Jay S. Jump

BK Attorney Services, LLC

d/b/a certificateofservice.com, for

Ashvin Pandurangi

AP Law Group, PLC

7777 Leesburg Pike, Suite 402N

Falls Church, VA 22043-0000

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 18-12579-BFK Doc 26 Filed 01/30/19 Entered 01/30/19 12:17:27 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
PARTIES DESIGNATED AS "EXCLUDE" WERE NOT SERVED VIA USPS FIRST CLASS MAIL

PARTIES WITH A '+' AND DESIGNATED AS "CM/ECF E-SERVICE" RECEIVED ELECTRONIC NOTICE THROUGH THE CM/ECF SYSTEM

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING

ATTN BANKRUPTCY

1661 WORTHINGTON ROAD SUITE 100

WEST PALM BEACH FL 33409

ODC RECOVERY SERVICES

12000 KENNEDY LANE SUITE 100

FREDERICKSBURG VA 22407

MW HEALTHCARE REGISTERED AGENT

2300 FALL HILL AVE SUITE 509

FREDERICKSBURG VA 22401

Case 18-12579-BFK Doc 26 Filed 01/30/19 Entered 01/30/19 12:17:27 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
§ 222.102 Who may file a complaint about a local educational agency's Indian policies and procedures? ( a ) Only a tribal chairman or an authorized designee for a tribe that has students attending an LEA's schools may file a written complaint with the Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education (Assistant Secretary) regarding any action of the LEA pursuant to, or relevant to, section 8004(a) and § 222.94.
( b ) If a tribe files a complaint through a designee, the tribe shall acknowledge in writing in the complaint that the designee is authorized to act on its behalf.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7704(e)(1))
EH005 

EH004 

003 

EH002 

EH104 

EH008 

0505 

0517a 

0517 

0516 

EH016 

0516 

0516a 

EH017 

EH017a 

EH017 

0517 

0514 

0517 

EH018 

050108 

EH119 

050108 

EH011 

EH010 

EH012 

EH010a 

EH010 

EH010 

EH023 

021

EH023 

EH036 

022 

EH024 

024 

EH025 

EH024a 

EH024a 

EH029a 

EH025a 

EH026 

EH130 

Collins Dr 

Ferry Dr 

Big Belt Dr 

Hauser Dam Rd 

Prickly Pear 

Creek 

Missouri River

Sleeping Giant View Dr 

022 

025 

Dana’s Point Dr 

Glass Dr 

31 

31 

Butte Field Office 

15 

31 

36 

Gates of the 

M o untains Wilderness 

Miles 

6 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF

25 

 THE INTERIOR 

0 50

Bureau of Land Management Upper 

1 6 

Holter 

Lake 

Gates of the
 

Mountains Wilderness
 

EH001 006 

Butte Field Office 

Draft RMP/EIS 15

East Helena Travel Plan
 

Route Designations
 

Under Alternative A
 BLM Routes Land Ownership 

Open Yearlong Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
 

Closed 10/15 to 12/1
 Local Government 

Other Routes 

Private Non-BLM Route
 

County Access Route State
 

Forest Service Route US Forest Service (USFS) 

Interstate USFS Wilderness Area 

Contour Interval is 100 feet Water 

Any BLM route that has a 3-digit number should have the prefix EH before it 

(i.e. 039 is EH039) 

Unless otherwise managed, BLM lands within the East Helena TPA are open
 

to cross country snowmobile travel
 

Albers Equal Area NAD83 Projection 

Miles 

012 0.5 

EH113 

Map Shows Alternative A for the
 

North Hills Locality of the East
 

Helena Travel Plan Area
 Beacon 

Hill 

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of 

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data 

for individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by 

BLM. This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product 

was developed through digital means and information may be updated without 

notification. 

36 31 

Black Sandy 

Recreation Site 

15 

Hauser 

Snowdrift Rd 

1 Lake 

6 White Sandy 

Recreation Site 

027b 

February 2007
 

6
### §742j. Authorization of appropriations

There are hereby authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this Act.

(Aug. 8, 1956, ch. 1036, §11, 70 Stat. 1124.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act Aug. 8, 1956, ch. 1036, 70 Stat. 1119, known as the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, which is classified generally to sections 742a to 742d and 742e to 742j–2 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 742a of this title and Tables.
2007 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 4-26-2007 

# U SA v . S hedrick P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 04-2329

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2007 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " U SA v . S he dr ick " (2007). 2007 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1154. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007/1154U N IT E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT N o. 04- 2329 UN I TED STATES v. J AM E S S HE DR I CK ,

A ppel l ant A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt f o r th e E a ste rn D istric t o f P e n n sy lv a n ia ( D . C . C r i m i nal A ct i on N o. 02- cr - 00523) D istric t Ju d g e : H o n o ra b le L e g ro m e D . D a v is

B efor e: A M B R O , FU E N T E S, and G R E E N B E R G , C i r cui tJ udges O R D E R T he pane l i n t he above - capt i oned ca s e her ebygr ant s panel r ehea r i ng su a sp o n te , and the p re c e d e n tial o p in io n f

iled F e b ru a ry2 8 , 2 0 0 7 , rep o rte d a t 4 7 8 F .3 d 5 1 9 (3 d C ir. 2 0 0 7 ), is her ebyvaca t ed.

B yth e C o u rt, / s /T hom as L . A m br o C i r cui tJ udge D at ed: A pr i l 26, 2007 A RL / c c : PA L; TPH
# Official Journal L 306/23 N

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 306 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5023 November 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 306

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5023 November 2007

---

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Regulation No 44 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) Uniform provisions concerning the approval of restraining devices for child occupants of power driven vehicles (child restraint systems) | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Regulation No 44 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) Uniform provisions concerning the approval of restraining devices for child occupants of power driven vehicles (child restraint systems)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
§ 300.114 LRE requirements. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in § 300.324(d)(2) (regarding children with disabilities in adult prisons), the State must have in effect policies and procedures to ensure that public agencies in the State meet the LRE requirements of this section and §§ 300.115 through 300.120.
( 2 ) Each public agency must ensure that— ( i ) To the maximum extent appropriate, children with disabilities, including children in public or private institutions or other care facilities, are educated with children who are nondisabled; and
( ii ) Special classes, separate schooling, or other removal of children with disabilities from the regular educational environment occurs only if the nature or severity of the disability is such that education in regular classes with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily.
( b ) *Additional requirement—State funding mechanism* — ( 1 ) *General.* ( i ) A State funding mechanism must not result in placements that violate the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section; and
( ii ) A State must not use a funding mechanism by which the State distributes funds on the basis of the type of setting in which a child is served that will result in the failure to provide a child with a disability FAPE according to the unique needs of the child, as described in the child's IEP.
( 2 ) *Assurance.* If the State does not have policies and procedures to ensure compliance with paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the State must provide the Secretary an assurance that the State will revise the funding mechanism as soon as feasible to ensure that the mechanism does not result in placements that violate that paragraph.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0030) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(5))
ASSIGNMENT

     I, Roger Brockbank. having contributed to the legal expenses in the
prosecution of Letters Patent to a certain invention called "Surface Assisted
Continuous 'Underground Mining Conveyor" (the "invention"), described,
illustrated and claimed 'M an application for Letters Patent of the United
States of America, Serial No. 09/024,438 filed by Randall D. Peterson on
February 17, 1998, do hereby assign and transfer to Softwall Equipment
Corporation, a corporation of the state of Utah, having its principal offices
at 11602 Colchester Drive Sandy, Utah 84092, United States of America, and to
its successors assigns and legal representatives, my entire right, title and
interest to the invention together with the my right, title and interest in
and to said application, and in any division), extension, continuation or
reissue thereof, said Softwall Equipment Corporation, bearing all outstanding
current and future patent application expenses, including attorneys fees.
This assignment is executed in exchange for Softwall Equipment Corporation's
payment of $14,700 (fourteen thousand seven hundred dollars) and issuance of
10,000 (ten thousand) shares o f its common stock to me.


     Roger R.
Brockbank                                                         Date


     STATE, OF UTAH
                              SS.
     COUNTY OF SALT LAKE

     1, Bart Burnside, Notary Public in and for the County and State
aforesaid, do hereby certify that Roger Brockbank, whose name is subscribed to
the foregoing instrument, appeared before me this day in person and
acknowledged that he signed, sealed and delivered said instrument as hi
voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes set forth. -

Given under my hand and notarial seat this 21st day of September, 1999.

          Notary Public,

My commission expires:               Residing at
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-14-00352-CR 

IN RE B.J. ALLEN GALLOWAY, RELATOR 

 

OPINION ON ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 

 

September 29, 2014 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. 

Pending before the court is B.J. Allen Galloway’s “Petition for a Writ of Habeas 

Corpus by a Person in State Custody.” The petition is addressed to the Seventh District 

of Texas, Criminal Division but appears on a form used to pursue habeas relief in 

federal courts. Through the document, Galloway seeks to set aside a final conviction in 

Cause No. 66,255 rendered by the district court for the 108th Judicial District, Potter 

County, Texas, by contending that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. We 

dismiss the petition.

One seeking to set aside a final conviction via a habeas corpus petition filed in 

state court must do so pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal 

Procedure. More importantly, we have no jurisdiction over article 11.07 proceedings. 
2

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2014); see Runnels v. State, 804 

S.W.2d 278 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 1991, no pet.); see also Watson v. State, 96 S.W.3d 

497, 500 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2002, pet. ref’d) (holding that courts of appeal lack the 

authority to issue original writs of habeas corpus in other than certain civil matters); TEX.

GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (West 2004) (providing the authority to issue certain writs).

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
g:\blm\buttermp\ams\FinalFigures\Fig2-11_FireRegimes1117.mxd 

Jefferson County 

§ ̈¦15 

Broadwater County 

£¤12 Townsend 

Boulder 

Anaconda 

§ ̈¦90 

Deerlodge County 

£¤287 

Butte 

Silverbow County Gallatin County 

§ ̈¦15 

Whitehall 

Three Forks 

Belgrade 

Bozeman 

I NL = non-lethal SR2 = stand replacement, long interval water 

MS1 = mixed severity, short interval SR3 = stand replacement; grass/shrub type snow/ice Historic Fire Regimes 

MS2 = mixed severity, long interval agriculture Butte Field Office - EIS 0 Miles 10 

MS3 = mixed severity, high elevation rock/barren RMP Planning Area, Montana No warranty is made by the Bureau of Map

Land Management (BLM) for use of Location
 SR1 = stand replacement, short interval urban FIGURE 2-11b 

data for purposes not intended by BLM.
HOME LOAN GUARANTY

NATIVE AMERICAN DIRECT HOME LOAN 

Disabilities determined by VA to be related to your military service can lead to monthly non-taxable compensation, enrollment in the 

VA health care system, a 10-point hiring preference for federal employment and other important benefits. Ask your VA 

representative or Veterans Service Organization representative about Disability Compensation, Pension, Health Care, Caregiver

Program,Career Services, Educational Assistance, Home Loan Guaranty, Insurance and/or Dependents and Survivors’ Benefits.

OVERVIEW

Since 1992, the Native American Veteran Direct Loan (NADL) program has provided eligible 

Native American Veterans and their spouses the opportunity to use their Department of 

Veterans Affairs (VA) home loan guaranty benefit on Federal trust land. 

HOW DOES THE NADL PROGRAM WORK?

By statute, before VA may make a loan to any Native American Veteran, the Veteran’s tribal or other 

sovereign governing body must enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with VA. Native 

American Veterans who are eligible for VA home loan benefits and whose sovereign governments have 

signed an MOU, may then apply directly to VA for a 30 year fixed rate loan to purchase, build, or 

improve a home located on Federal trust land. They may also refinance a direct loan already made 

under this program to lower their interest rate. If the property is not located on Federal trust land, the 

Veteran can use the traditional VA-guaranteed Home Loan program. 

WHAT ARE THE LOAN LIMITS AND INTEREST RATES?

Please see the current list of loan limits and the interest rates for NADLs. 

HOW CAN I CONTACT VA TO LEARN MORE ABOUT GETTING A NADL?

VA has nine regional offices that can assist with loan guaranty questions. Please contact the RLC in 

your area of jurisdiction. You can locate your RLC of jurisdiction. 

Home Loans – February 2015
#### § 300.117 Nonacademic settings.

In providing or arranging for the provision of nonacademic and extracurricular services and activities, including meals, recess periods, and the services and activities set forth in § 300.107, each public agency must ensure that each child with a disability participates with nondisabled children in the extracurricular services and activities to the maximum extent appropriate to the needs of that child. The public agency must ensure that each child with a disability has the supplementary aids and services determined by the child's IEP Team to be appropriate and necessary for the child to participate in nonacademic settings.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0030)

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(5))
Summary: BLM Employee’s Actions Created the Appearance of a 

Conflict of Interest 

Report Date: September 3, 2020 Report Number: 19-0569 

The OIG investigated allegations that a Bureau of Land Management (BLM) employee shared 

nonpublic information with a family member for use in an Off-Range Pasturing (ORP) contract 

proposal and had a direct financial interest in the award of the contract. 

We did not find that the employee violated conflict-of-interest laws or provided nonpublic 

information to a family member. The employee did, however, assist a family member with some 

aspects of the ORP contract bid and stood to gain financially if the family member had received 

the contract. (We note, however, that when the family member learned that the proposal had 

raised concerns, the family member rescinded the submission.) The Standards of Ethical Conduct 

for Employees of the Executive Branch state, in part, that employees may not use their public 

office for the private gain of themselves or their relatives and that employees should avoid even 

the appearance of violating these standards. We concluded the employee did not comply with the 

standards because their actions created the appearance of using public office for the private gain 

of themselves and their family member. 

This is a summary of an investigative report we issued to the BLM Deputy Director. 

Office of Investigations | Office of Inspector General | U.S. Department of the Interior | Washington, DC
----

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘proposal for a Council Regulation concerning management measures for the sustainable exploitation of fishery resources in the Mediterranean Sea and amending Regulations (EC) No. 2847/93 and (EC) No. 973/2001’

(COM(2003) 589 final -2003/0229 (CNS))

(2004/C 110/17)

On 16 December 2003, the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 37 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the above-mentioned proposal

On 27 January 2004, the Bureau of the European Economic and Social Committee instructed the Section for Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment to prepare its work on the subject.

In view of the urgency of the matter, the Committee appointed Mr Sarró Iparraguirre as rapporteur-general at its 406th plenary session held on 25 and 26 February 2004 (meeting of 26 February). The opinion was adopted by 63 votes to two, with three abstentions.

1.   Introduction

2.   General comments

2.4   Negative aspects of the proposal for a regulation

Of the eleven chapters of the regulation, those displaying negative aspects are analysed first.

2.5   Positive aspects of the proposal for a regulation still leaving room for improvement

3.   Conclusion

Brussels, 26 February 2004.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Roger BRIESCH

----

(1)  COM(2003) 589 final

(2)OJ L 171, 6.7.1994, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 973/2001 (OJ L 137, 19.5.2001)

(3)  OJ C 133, 6.6.2003

(4)OJ L 261, 20.10.1993, p.1.

(5)OJ L 137, 19.5.2001, p.1.

(6)OJ C 133, 6.6.2003

(7)OJ C 133, 6.6.2003

(8)  General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean

(9)  International Standard Classification Fishing Gears.

(10)  ICCAT: International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tuna:

----