alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### State of Nebraska, ex rel. Elli A. Beach, v. James S. Fields.

Filed September 18, 1901.

No. 12,001.

An Appeal Where None Lies Is Null, and Mandamus Will Lie to Enforce Appellee’s Right. Where a defendant in an action of forcible entry and detainer had appealed from a judgment rendered against him therein, for restitution of the premises in which no appeal lies, the entire proceedings are null and void, and mandamus may be invoked to require the issuance of a writ of restitution.

Original application for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to issue a writ of resti*521tution on a judgment recovered in an action of forcible entry and detainer.

*Writ allowed.*

*Jackson & Williams,*for relator.

*E. B. Kilbourn*and *W. V. Allen, contra.*

Nor val, O. J.

This is an application by Elli A. Beach for a peremptory mandamus to compel the respondent, the county judge of Antelope county, to issue a writ, of restitution on a judgment recovered by relator in an action of forcible entry and detainer. The facts briefly stated, are these: Relator commenced an action of forcible entry' and detention before the respondent, as county judge of Antelope county, against one James Brown, to-recover possession of certain real estate. Subsequently, in April, 1899, relator recovered judgment of restitution of the premises, and Brown appealed to the district court, but prosecuted no proceeding in error. Respondent, on demand, refused to issue a writ of restitution, and this proceeding was thereupon brought.

.The case is free from difficulty. The statute authorizing an appeal in that kind of a case was unconstitutional and the attempted appeal was abortive and conferred no jurisdiction of the cause upon the district court. *Armstrong v. Mayer,*60 Nebr., 423. The judgment of the county court was not superseded by the giving of the appeal bond. *Supra.*Relator was entitled to a writ of restitution, and mandamus is the appropriate remedy to require respondent to issue the same. High, Extraordinary Legal Remedies, sec. 242.

Writ allowed.

Sullivan, J., absent, not voting.
Helena 

East Helena 

BLM Routes Other Routes 

Open Yearlong Public Access Route 

Closed Yearlong 

Non-BLM Route Decommission 

Campground Interstate 

BLM Routes with Restrictions 

US Route Closed 9/1 to 12/1 

Non-Motorized Use Only State Highway 

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land
 

Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data for individual
 

or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. This map may
 

not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed through
 

digital means and information may be updated without notification.
 

Miles 

0 4 Map Scale 1:80,000 

Map generated by the Butte Field Office in February 2007 

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection 

Spokane Hills Trailhead 

Bureau of Land Managment (BLM) 

Bureau of Reclamation 

County / City Government 

Private 

State Lands 

Other Federal Lands 

US Forest Service (USFS) 

Water 

County Boundary 

Field Office / TPA Boundary 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
 

Bureau of Land Management
 

Butte Field Office
 

Draft RMP/EIS
 

Map 13: East Helena Travel
 

Plan Route Designations
 

Under Alternative D
 

Malta 

Field Office 

Missoula
 

Field Office
 

Lewistown
 

Field Office
 

Miles City 

Field Office 

Butte Billings 

Field Field Office 

Office 

Dillon
 

Field Office
 

Miles 

0 400 

Townsend 

Map shows proposed road management within the East Helena Travel Planning 

Area under Alternative D. Under this alternative 36.0 miles of road would 

be Open yearlong, 1.95 miles of road would be Open with a seasonal closure 

from September 1 to December 1, 29.7 miles of road would be Closed yearlong, 

and 3.1 miles of road would be Decommissioned.
### **CHAPTER 18—CONGRESSIONAL, CABINET, AND SUPREME COURT ASSASSINATION, KIDNAPPING, AND ASSAULT**

Sec.
351.
Congressional, Cabinet, and Supreme Court assassination, kidnapping, and assault; penalties.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330021(1), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2150, which directed the amendment of this title "by striking 'kidnaping' each place it appears and inserting 'kidnapping' ", was executed by substituting "KIDNAPPING" for "KIDNAPING" in chapter heading, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330021(1), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2150, substituted "kidnapping" for "kidnaping" in item 351.

**1982**—Pub. L. 97–285, §2(b), (c), Oct. 6, 1982, 96 Stat. 1219, substituted "CONGRESSIONAL, CABINET, AND SUPREME COURT ASSASSINATION, KIDNAPING, AND ASSAULT" for "CONGRESSIONAL ASSASSINATION, KIDNAPING, AND ASSAULT" as chapter heading and substituted "Congressional, Cabinet, and Supreme Court assassination, kidnaping, and assault: penalties" for "Congressional assassination, kidnaping, and assault; penalties" in item 351.

**1971**—Pub. L. 91–644, title IV, §15, Jan. 2, 1971, 84 Stat. 1891, added chapter 18 and item 351.
#### Haywood Allen CANNON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lewis H. SWINDELL, IV; Norman Edward Wiggins, Individually and in his capacity as administrator; Marvin Eugene Wiggins, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-1077.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 25, 2002.

Decided May 6, 2002.

*906Haywood Allen Cannon, Appellant Pro Se. Lewis H. Swindell, IV, Norman Edward Wiggins, Marvin Eugene Wiggins, Appellees.

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Haywood Allen Cannon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Cannon v. Swindell,*No. CA-01-82-7-BR (E.D.N.C. Dec. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of LegalPlay Entertainment Inc. on form
10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Cecil Morris,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



November 21, 2005                           /s/ Cecil Morris
----------------------------------          ------------------------------------
(Date)                                      Cecil Morris
                                            Director, President / Secretary
### Contributions to economic geology of Alaska

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1155

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
!" 	#$%&&'%()



)	

	


	*!+(,+-$%	


	




	

			


		

 !  "
#$%&

""."

%
& 

	'()*+,- 

%#&   	     		  

  		        

  	     	 

(. 		

		

	

	.	
		.				
	

	 

%& /

		
					


 

  	  		 
  	.
  

.			

							  /



		
					




						 

%0& (.



1


	-		2	!'		( 
$30 


		
				0/	0




	
	

	
	&

	
		4	
.&		


#5&
	.					

				 *		.






	
	6

	7

4	
. 

%$&

%8& '		9

Case 18-33785-KLP Doc 13 Filed 10/18/18 Entered 10/18/18 12:08:05 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
!:4	;

9

('*-');<,-('+'+-+

-	4=======================

*/!>)'+?*!

@@	
, :

	
, :

	
	

 ' :6
5
A

+2/##
5

%5B0&#C385BB

2!:(9D#C5
$

Oct 15 2018

/s/ Keith L. Phillips

Oct 18 2018

Case 18-33785-KLP Doc 13 Filed 10/18/18 Entered 10/18/18 12:08:05 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
### §1264. Delivery to consignee

Whoever, being an officer, agent, or employee of any railroad company, express company, or other common carrier, knowingly delivers to any person other than the person to whom it has been consigned, unless upon the written order in each instance of the bona fide consignee, or to any fictitious person, or to any person under a fictitious name, any spirituous, vinous, malted, or other fermented liquor or any compound containing any spirituous, vinous, malted, or other fermented liquor fit for use for beverage purposes, which has been shipped into any place within the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 761; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §388 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §238, 35 Stat. 1136; June 25, 1936, ch. 815, §6, 49 Stat. 1929).

Reference to persons causing or procuring was omitted as unnecessary in view of definition of "principal" in section 2 of this title.

Words "Territory, or District of the United States, or place noncontiguous to but subject to the jurisdiction thereof," which appeared twice, were omitted. See section 5 of this title defining the "United States."

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000".
#### Nathaniel R. SANDERS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Leslie RYDER, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 01-35654. D.C. No. CV-00-01337-MJP.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 6, 2002 *.

Decided May 10, 2002.

Before RYMER, McKEOWN and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Nathaniel Sanders, a Washington state prisoner, appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition challenging his conviction by jury trial for first degree assault, attempting to elude a pursuing police vehicle, and unlawful possession of a firearm. We affirm.

Whether or not the Magistrate Judge properly found sua sponte that Sanders had failed to exhaust his jury instruction *378claim in state court and that the claim was procedurally defaulted, Sanders’ jury instruction claim fails on the merits because Sanders points to no constitutional error.

Sanders contends that the trial court violated his Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses by not allowing him to question a key State’s witness, Kenneth Agan, concerning Agan’s prior drug activity, Agan’s relationship with gang members, and Agan’s possession of a laser sight for a gun. As noted by the state appeals court, defense counsel was allowed on cross examination to question Agan regarding his prior drug use, his involvement in the drug trade, his familiarity with guns and laser sights, and the immunity he was offered for his testimony. Only in one area, which was a collateral matter regarding gang connections of a person known as “G Mike,” did the court limit the scope of cross-examination of Agan. Although Sanders has quoted Supreme Court cases on witness bias, the state trial court’s rulings did not violate the clearly established principles therein. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1); *Williams v. Taylor,*529 U.S. 362, 379, 120 S.Ct. 1495, 146 L.Ed.2d 389 (2000). The state trial court did not abuse its discretion in reasonably limiting the scope of cross examination, and no constitutional violation was caused thereby. *Delaware v. Van Arsdall,*475 U.S. 673, 679, 106 S.Ct. 1431, 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
### §7010. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary such sums as may be necessary to carry out the obligations of the United States under the Agreement and this chapter.

(Pub. L. 109–479, title VI, §611, Jan. 12, 2007, 120 Stat. 3649.)
#### §§ 222.76-222.79 [Reserved]
§ 303.21 Infant or toddler with a disability. ( a ) *Infant or toddler with a disability* means an individual under three years of age who needs early intervention services because the individual— ( 1 ) Is experiencing a developmental delay, as measured by appropriate diagnostic instruments and procedures, in one or more of the following areas: ( i ) Cognitive development.
( ii ) Physical development, including vision and hearing.
( iii ) Communication development.
( iv ) Social or emotional development.
( v ) Adaptive development; or
( 2 ) Has a diagnosed physical or mental condition that— ( i ) Has a high probability of resulting in developmental delay; and
( ii ) Includes conditions such as chromosomal abnormalities; genetic or congenital disorders; sensory impairments; inborn errors of metabolism; disorders reflecting disturbance of the development of the nervous system; congenital infections; severe attachment disorders; and disorders secondary to exposure to toxic substances, including fetal alcohol syndrome.
( b ) *Infant or toddler with a disability* may include, at a State's discretion, an *at-risk infant or toddler* (as defined in § 303.5).
( c ) *Infant or toddler with a disability* may include, at a State's discretion, a child with a disability who is eligible for services under section 619 of the Act and who previously received services under this part until the child enters, or is eligible under State law to enter, kindergarten or elementary school, as appropriate, provided that any programs under this part must include— ( 1 ) An educational component that promotes school readiness and incorporates pre-literacy, language, and numeracy skills for children ages three and older who receive part C services pursuant to § 303.211; and
( 2 ) A written notification to parents of a child with a disability who is eligible for services under section 619 of the Act and who previously received services under this part of their rights and responsibilities in determining whether their child will continue to receive services under this part or participate in preschool programs under section 619 of the Act.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1401(16), 1432(5))
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 82329 / December 14, 2017

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3- 17672

In the Matter of

DERIK J. TODD, MADISON CAPITAL 

ENERGY INCOME FUND II GP LLC, 

BIG HORN MINERALS LLC, 

MADISON CAPITAL INVESTMENTS 

LLC, AND MADISON ROYALTY 

MANAGEMENT LLC,

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

By order dated June 30, 2017, the Commission issued the “Omnibus Order Directing the 

Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that Establish Distribution 

Funds” (“Omnibus Order”),1authorizing the Secretary to issue orders beginning June 2017 and for 

calendar year 2018 appointing, upon request by the Commission staff, Miller Kaplan Arase LLP, a 

certified public accounting firm, which acquired Damasco & Associates LLP (“Miller Kaplan”), 

with one of their offices located in San Francisco, California, as tax administrator (“Tax 

Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund may incur tax-related 

obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department of the Treasury 

Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On December 14, 2017, the Commission staff requested the appointment of Miller 

Kaplan as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Miller Kaplan, pursuant to and in accordance with the 

Omnibus Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Brent J. Fields

Secretary

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 81057 (June 30, 2017).
### **CHAPTER 12—CIVIL DISORDERS**

Sec.
231.
Civil disorders.
232.
Definitions.
233.
Preemption.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1968**—Pub. L. 90–284, title X, §1002(a), Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 90, added chapter 12 and items 231 to 233.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief
Executive Officer of HM Publishing Corp. and Houghton Mifflin Company (together, the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) | the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    ANTHONY
LUCKIAnthony Lucki President and Chief Executive Officer




Date: March 25, 2005



A signed original of this written statement,
required by Section 906, has been provided to HM Publishing Corp. and Houghton Mifflin Company and will be retained by HM Publishing Corp. and Houghton Mifflin Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
### §90a–1. Lake Chelan National Recreation Area; establishment; statement of purposes; description of area

In order to provide for the public outdoor recreation use and enjoyment of portions of the Stehekin River and Lake Chelan, together with the surrounding lands, and for the conservation of the scenic, scientific, historic, and other values contributing to public enjoyment of such lands and waters, there is hereby established, subject to valid existing rights, the Lake Chelan National Recreation Area (hereinafter referred to in this subchapter as the "recreation area"). The recreation area shall consist of the lands and waters within the area designated "Lake Chelan National Recreation Area" on the map referred to in section 90 of this title.

(Pub. L. 90–544, title II, §202, Oct. 2, 1968, 82 Stat. 927.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Boundary Adjustments, Lake Chelan National Recreation Area and Wenatchee National Forest, Washington

Pub. L. 105–238, §1, Sept. 23, 1998, 112 Stat. 1562, and Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(e) [title III, §342], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–231, 2681–296, transferred administrative jurisdiction over part of Lake Chelan National Recreation Area from Secretary of the Interior to Secretary of Agriculture for inclusion in Wenatchee National Forest.
§ 34.6 Rights in connection with garnishment. Before starting garnishment, we provide you the opportunity— ( a ) To inspect and copy our records related to the debt;
( b ) To enter into a written repayment agreement with us to repay the debt under terms we consider acceptable;
( c ) For a hearing in accordance with § 34.8 concerning— ( 1 ) The existence, amount, or current enforceability of the debt;
( 2 ) The rate at which the garnishment order will require your employer to withhold pay; and
( 3 ) Whether you have been continuously employed less than 12 months after you were involuntarily separated from employment.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3720D)
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of The Hertz Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul J. Siracusa, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|Date: July 14, 2006 |  |     |                                                                                         
|------------------- |  | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | By: | /s/PAUL J. SIRACUSAPaul J. Siracusa
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To The Board of Directors of Household Finance Corporation:

     We consent to the incorporation of our report dated March 24, 2003,
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Household Finance Corporation as
of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2002, into the Company's previously filed Registration
Statements No. 333-47945, No. 333-59453, No. 333-82119, No. 333-45740, No.
333-56152, No. 333-73746, No. 333-75328, No. 333-85886, No. 333-33240 and No.
333-61964 on Form S-3.

                                          /s/ KPMG LLP
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 25, 2003
### §1349. Attempt and conspiracy

Any person who attempts or conspires to commit any offense under this chapter shall be subject to the same penalties as those prescribed for the offense, the commission of which was the object of the attempt or conspiracy.

(Added Pub. L. 107–204, title IX, §902(a), July 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 805.)