alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

RICHARD F. JOYCE

, Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES and

GUARDIAN AD LITEM

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 20

- 922

[ August 17, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Carolyn Bell , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502019DP0000129 XXXXMB (JK)

.

Richard F. Joyce of the Law Office of Richard F. Joyce, P.A., Miami,

and Kevin Coyle Colbert, Miami, for ap pellant.

Andrew Feigenbaum of Children's Legal Services, West Palm Beach,

for appell ee Department of Children & Families.

Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director, and Samantha C. Valley,

Senior Attorney, Tallahassee, for appellee Guardian ad Litem.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN

, K LINGENSMITH and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### §8034. Gulf of Mexico IUU Fishing Subworking Group

#### (a) In general

Not later than 90 days after December 20, 2019, the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, in coordination with the Commandant of the Coast Guard and the Secretary of State, shall establish a subworking group to address IUU fishing in the exclusive economic zone of the United States in the Gulf of Mexico.

#### (b) Functions

The subworking group established under subsection (a) shall identify—

(1) Federal actions taken and policies established during the 5-year period immediately preceding December 20, 2019, with respect to IUU fishing in the exclusive economic zone of the United States in the Gulf of Mexico, including such actions and policies related to—

(A) the surveillance, interdiction, and prosecution of any foreign nationals engaged in such fishing; and

(B) the application of the provisions of the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 1826d et seq.) to any relevant nation, including the status of any past or ongoing consultations and certification procedures;

(2) actions and policies, in addition to the actions and policies described in paragraph (1), each of the Federal agencies described in subsection (a) can take, using existing resources, to combat IUU fishing in the exclusive economic zone of the United States in the Gulf of Mexico; and

(3) any additional authorities that could assist each such agency in more effectively addressing such IUU fishing.

#### (c) Report

Not later than 1 year after the IUU Fishing Subworking Group is established under subsection (a), the group shall submit a report to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives that contains—

(1) the findings identified pursuant to subsection (b); and

(2) a timeline for each of the Federal agencies described in subsection (a) to implement each action or policy identified pursuant to subsection (b)(2).

(Pub. L. 116–92, div. C, title XXXV, §3554, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2008.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(1)(B), is Pub. L. 104–43, title VI, Nov. 3, 1995, 109 Stat. 391, which enacted sections 1826d to 1826g of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 1826d of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1995 Amendment note set out under section 1801 of this title and Tables.
#### Gertrude Hoffman, Appellant, *v.*William Hoffman, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

*Per Curiam.*

The defendant failed to demand judgment for the return of the chattels in accordance with sections 1119 and 1124 of the Civil Practice Act. Under these circumstances the court could do no more than direct judgment dismissing the complaint with statutory costs to the defendant. *(Levy*v. *Hohweisner,*101 App. Div. 82.)

The judgment and order should be modified accordingly, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.

Present—Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Judgment and order unanimously modified in accordance with opinion, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.
### §831cc. Separability

The sections of this chapter are declared to be separable, and in the event any one or more sections of this chapter be held to be unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of other sections of this chapter.

(May 18, 1933, ch. 32, §30, 48 Stat. 72; Aug. 31, 1935, ch. 836, §15, 49 Stat. 1081.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1935—Act Aug. 31, 1935, reenacted provisions of this section without change.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from IDACORP,
Inc.(Ex-27A) and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,711,509
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    129,437
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         230,223
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       380,451
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,451,620
<COMMON>                                       451,564
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            278,833
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 730,397
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    105,968
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           802,199
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       13,738
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  38,524
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    6,029
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 754,765
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,451,620
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,121,976
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            44,630
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     930,755
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     975,385
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        146,591
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               8,020
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 154,611
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        65,435
<NET-INCOME>                                    89,176
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   89,176
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        69,868
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       52,270
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         169,887
<EPS-BASIC>                                     2.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.37



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      Exhibit 23
           

                       Consent of Independent Accountants
                       ----------------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
HMI Industries Inc. (the "Company") on Form S-8 (File No. 333-47153) of our
report dated December 23, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of the Company, as of September 30, 1998 and 1997 and for each of the
three years in the period ended September 30, 1998, included on page 21 of the
Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of
our report dated December 23, 1998 on the Financial Statement Schedule, which
appears on page 43 of this Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
December 23, 1998
§ 106.32 Housing. ( a ) *Generally.* A recipient shall not, on the basis of sex, apply different rules or regulations, impose different fees or requirements, or offer different services or benefits related to housing, except as provided in this section (including housing provided only to married students).
( b ) *Housing provided by recipient.* ( 1 ) A recipient may provide separate housing on the basis of sex.
( 2 ) Housing provided by a recipient to students of one sex, when compared to that provided to students of the other sex, shall be as a whole: ( i ) Proportionate in quantity to the number of students of that sex applying for such housing; and
( ii ) Comparable in quality and cost to the student.
( c ) *Other housing.* ( 1 ) A recipient shall not, on the basis of sex, administer different policies or practices concerning occupancy by its students of housing other than provided by such recipient.
( 2 ) A recipient which, through solicitation, listing, approval of housing, or otherwise, assists any agency, organization, or person in making housing available to any of its students, shall take such reasonable action as may be necessary to assure itself that such housing as is provided to students of one sex, when compared to that provided to students of the other sex, is as a whole: ( i ) Proportionate in quantity and
( ii ) Comparable in quality and cost to the student.
A recipient may render such assistance to any agency, organization, or person which provides all or part of such housing to students only of one sex. [45 FR 30955, May 9, 1980, as amended at 85 FR 30579, May 19, 2020]
First Department,

November, 1913.

#### Julius Cohen, Appellant, *v.*Julius Ratner and Others, Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the Hew York county clerk’s office on the 3d day of January, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered on the 13th day of January, 1913, denying a motion for a new trial.

Per Curiam:

At the close of the plaintiff’s case he had made out a *prima facie*case, and there was no evidence presented by the defendants which established any defense. There should, therefore, have been a direction of a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The judgment and order should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Judgment and order reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event. Order to be settled on notice.
<Page>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

THIS IS AN ADDENDUM TO THE CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT OF EDWARD MCCORMACK AND FLAG
TELECOM HOLDINGS LIMITED ("FLAG") DATED 30 NOVEMBER 2001 ("THE CONTRACT")


Dear Ed:

EXECUTIVE RETENTION PROGRAM ("THE PROGRAM")

The purpose of the Program is to retain executives who are critical to
maintaining the ongoing operations of FLAG Telecom Holdings Limited and its
group companies.

You will become entitled to a sum of US$750,000 minus applicable tax withholding
(the "RETENTION PAYMENT AMOUNT") on 9 April 2002 (the "PAYMENT DATE").

Furthermore, you will be entitled to 0.75% of the Enterprise Value (as defined
in the William M. Mercer Report addressed to John Draheim, "Enterprise value is
defined as Working Capital + Market Value of Debt + Market Value of Equity") of
FLAG Telecom Holdings Limited and its group companies over a threshold of US$150
million at the time a restructuring plan is decided upon by the Court in the
context of the current restructuring of FLAG Telecom Holdings Limited.

If you terminate your employment with FLAG or give notice to terminate your
employment with FLAG prior to the decision on a restructuring plan by the Court
then you will repay the net Retention Payment Amount to FLAG immediately.

FLAG considers that the current change of control language in Clause 2.2(b)
("Change of Control") in the Contract linked to payment is not triggered by the
Court's decision on a restructuring plan, its implementation, or any part of
such process. In the event that such restructuring is held to be a Change of
Control at some future date, the Retention Payment Amount will be deducted from
any entitlement in the event of a Change of Control.

If you agree to these revised terms please sign and return to me the attached
copy of this agreement.

/s/ Andres Bande
----------------------------

FOR AND ON BEHALF OF FLAG

DATE  April 10, 2002
      --------------

/s/ Edward McCormack
----------------------------
EDWARD MCCORMACK

DATE  April 10, 2002
      --------------
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 23


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Reliant Energy, Incorporated's
(i) Registration No. 333-11329 on Form S-4; (ii) Registration Statement Nos.
33-46368, 33-54228, 333-323353, 333-33301, 333-33303, 333-58433, 333-70665,
333-81119 and 333-68290 on Form S-3; (iii) Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement No. 33-51417 on Form S-3; (iv) Registration Statement
Nos. 333-32413, 333-32585, 333-49333, 333-38188 and 333-60260 on Form S-8; (v)
Post-Effective Amendments Nos. 1, 2 and 3 to Registration Statement No.
333-11329-99 on Form S-8 and in CenterPoint Energy, Inc.'s Registration
Statement No. 333-69502 on Form S-4 of our report dated March 28, 2002, July 3,
2002, as to the effects of the restatement discussed in Note 1 (which expresses
an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the
restatement described in Note 1 and the change in method of accounting for
derivatives and hedging activities), appearing in this Amendment No. 1 to the
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Reliant Energy, Incorporated for the year ended
December 31, 2001.





Houston, Texas
July 3, 2002
### §7703. Authority and responsibility of the Secretary of State

The Secretary of State may—

(1) receive and transmit, on behalf of the United States, reports, requests, recommendations, proposals, decisions, and other communications of and to the Commission;

(2) in consultation with the Secretary, act upon, or refer to another appropriate authority, any communication received pursuant to paragraph (1);

(3) with the concurrence of the Secretary, and in accordance with the Convention, object to the decisions of the Commission; and

(4) request and utilize on a reimbursed or non-reimbursed basis the assistance, services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of other Federal departments and agencies, foreign governments or agencies, or international intergovernmental organizations, in the conduct of scientific research and other programs under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 114–327, title I, §103, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1979.)
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

In Re: 

Shaqueasha T Thompkins Case # 18-10025-BFK 

REPORT OF DEPOSIT OF UNCLAIMED FUNDS 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3011 and 11 U.S.C. 347, the trustee 

herein submits a check, or checks, payable to the “Clerk, United States Bankruptcy Court” 

representing unclaimed funds to be deposited by the Clerk of the Court into the Treasury 

of the United States. Said funds are subject to withdrawal as provided by 28 U.S.C. 2042 

and shall not escheat under any state law. Unclaimed funds represent the dividend(s) due 

and payable to the entity identified as the original payee on the face of the enclosed 

check(s). 

PAYEE 

SHAQUEASHA T THOMPKINS 

13007 Cordelia Court 

Woodbridge, VA 22192 

AMOUNT 

$466.00 

Dated: September 28, 2018 __/s/Thomas P. Gorman ___________ 

Thomas P. Gorman 

300 North Washington Street, Ste. 400 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

(703) 836-2226 

VSB#26421 

Case 18-10025-BFK Doc 49 Filed 09/28/18 Entered 09/28/18 11:33:03 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
§ 222.71 What tax rates may the Secretary use if substantial local revenues are derived from local tax sources other than real property taxes? ( a ) In a State in which a substantial portion of revenues for current expenditures for educational purposes is derived from local tax sources other than real property taxes, the State educational agency (SEA) may request that the Secretary take those revenues into account in determining whether an LEA in that State meets the applicable tax rate requirement under § 222.68.
( b ) If, based upon the request of an SEA, the Secretary determines that it is appropriate to take the revenues described in paragraph (a) of this section into account in determining whether an LEA in that State meets the applicable tax rate requirement under § 222.68, the Secretary uses tax rates computed by— ( 1 ) Dividing the assessed value of each classification of real property in the LEA by the percentage of true value assigned to that property for tax purposes and aggregating the results;
( 2 ) Determining the LEA's total revenues derived from local tax sources for current expenditures (as defined in section 8013);
( 3 ) Dividing the amount determined in paragraph (b)(2) of this section by the amount determined in paragraph (b)(1) of this section; and
( 4 ) Performing the computations in paragraphs (b)(1), (2), and (3) of this section for each of the generally comparable LEAs and then determining the average of those computed tax rates.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7703(b)(2))
#### § 1270.5 [Reserved].
#### § 300.10 [Reserved]
§ 463.175 What responsibility do States have to use quarterly wage record information for performance accountability? ( a ) ( 1 ) States must, consistent with State laws, use quarterly wage record information in measuring a State's performance on the primary indicators of performance outlined in § 463.155 and a local area's performance on the primary indicators of performance identified in § 463.205.
( 2 ) The use of social security numbers from participants and such other information as is necessary to measure the progress of those participants through quarterly wage record information is authorized.
( 3 ) To the extent that quarterly wage records are not available for a participant, States may use other information as is necessary to measure the progress of those participants through methods other than quarterly wage record information.
( b ) “Quarterly wage record information” means intrastate and interstate wages paid to an individual, the social security number (or numbers, if more than one) of the individual, and the name, address, State, and the Federal employer identification number of the employer paying the wages to the individual.
( c ) The Governor may designate a State agency (or appropriate State entity) to assist in carrying out the performance reporting requirements for WIOA core programs and ETPs. The Governor or such agency (or appropriate State entity) is responsible for: ( 1 ) Facilitating data matches;
( 2 ) Data quality reliability; and
( 3 ) Protection against disaggregation that would violate applicable privacy standards.
### §1350. Failure of corporate officers to certify financial reports

(a) Certification of Periodic Financial Reports.—Each periodic report containing financial statements filed by an issuer with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) shall be accompanied by a written statement by the chief executive officer and chief financial officer (or equivalent thereof) of the issuer.

(b) Content.—The statement required under subsection (a) shall certify that the periodic report containing the financial statements fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act pf 1 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

(c) Criminal Penalties.—Whoever—

(1) certifies any statement as set forth in subsections (a) and (b) of this section knowing that the periodic report accompanying the statement does not comport with all the requirements set forth in this section shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both; or

(2) willfully certifies any statement as set forth in subsections (a) and (b) of this section knowing that the periodic report accompanying the statement does not comport with all the requirements set forth in this section shall be fined not more than $5,000,000, or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

(Added Pub. L. 107–204, title IX, §906(a), July 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 806.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "of".
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

FREDERICK BROOKS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 78 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of August, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
### §503a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, acts May 16, 1928, ch. 572, 45 Stat. 569; Feb. 16, 1929, ch. 227, 45 Stat. 1220, which related to purpose for which appropriations for carrying out the provisions of section 503 of this title were available, was omitted in view of repeal of section 503 of this title.
Case 18-13328-BFK Doc 30 Filed 10/22/18 Entered 10/23/18 12:25:42 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
Case 18-13328-BFK Doc 30 Filed 10/22/18 Entered 10/23/18 12:25:42 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
Case 18-13328-BFK Doc 30 Filed 10/22/18 Entered 10/23/18 12:25:42 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 31.1(b)



CERTIFICATIONS





I, Stephen J. Schoepfer, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to theperiodic report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012 of Carbonics Capital
Corporation; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Date: June 29, 2012





|By: | /s/ Stephen J. Schoepfer | 
|--- | ------------------------ | 
|    |                          | 
|    |                          | 
|    | Stephen J. Schoepfer     | 
|    | Chief Executive Officer  |