alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                                  Certification

            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
                                      Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Excelsior Venture Partners III, LLC (the "Company"),
does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2003 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: September 15, 2003                           /s/ David I. Fann
                                                   ---------------------------
                                           Name: David I. Fann
                                           Title: Co-Chief Executive Officer


Date: September 15, 2003                           /s/ Douglas A. Lindgren
                                                   ---------------------------
                                           Name: Douglas A. Lindgren
                                           Title: Co-Chief Executive Officer


Date: September 15, 2003                           /s/ Robert F. Aufenanger
                                                   ---------------------------
                                           Name: Robert F. Aufenanger
                                           Title: Treasurer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Official Journal C 114/11 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 114 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6011 April 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 114

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6011 April 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2017/C 114/01 | Report on budgetary and financial management for 2016 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Auditors

2017/C 114/01

Report on budgetary and financial management for 2016

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2019150EN.01001001.xml

| 2.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 150/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 150/10

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1)
  )

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 150/05)

Decisions granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2019) 2941 | 24 April 2019 | Bis(2-methoxyethyl)ether (diglyme)
  EC No 203-924-4;
  CAS No 111-96-6 | Life Technologies AS, Ullernchaussen 52, NO-0379, PO Box 114 Smestad, NO-0309, Oslo, Norway | REACH/19/20/0 | Use as a process chemical in the manufacture of Dynabeads® | 22 August 2029 | — | Risk is adequately controlled in accordance with Article 60(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. |

Reference of the decision (2)

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2019) 2941

24 April 2019

Bis(2-methoxyethyl)ether (diglyme)

EC No 203-924-4;

CAS No 111-96-6

Life Technologies AS, Ullernchaussen 52, NO-0379, PO Box 114 Smestad, NO-0309, Oslo, Norway

REACH/19/20/0

Use as a process chemical in the manufacture of Dynabeads®

22 August 2029

—

Risk is adequately controlled in accordance with Article 60(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.

| — | There are no suitable alternatives. |
| --- | --- |

—

There are no suitable alternatives.

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/chemicals/reach/about/index_en.htm

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4933 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4933

To amend the Women in Apprenticeship and Nontraditional Occupations Act 
 to provide for reimbursement of certain expenses and to establish new 
    requirements for selection of grantees, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 30, 2019

   Mr. Veasey (for himself and Mr. Brendan F. Boyle of Pennsylvania) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Women in Apprenticeship and Nontraditional Occupations Act 
 to provide for reimbursement of certain expenses and to establish new 
    requirements for selection of grantees, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Women in Apprenticeship and 
Nontraditional Occupations Amendment Act''.

SEC. 2. IN GENERAL.

    Section 4 of the ``Women in Apprenticeship and Nontraditional 
Occupations Act'' is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (6), by striking ``and'';
                    (B) in paragraph (7), by striking the period and 
                inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(8) reimbursement to individuals for childcare and 
        transportation expenses incurred as a result of participation 
        in a program funded under this section.''; and
            (2) by amending subsection (b) to read as follows:
    ``(b) Selection of Employer and Labor Unions.--The Secretary shall 
select not fewer than 1 employer or labor union from each State, and 
not fewer than 50 employers or labor unions total, to receive technical 
assistance provided with grants made under subsection (a).''.
                                 <all>
```
PUBLIC LAW 114–234—OCT. 7, 2016 130 STAT. 963 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3937: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 114–464 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

Sept. 20, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–234 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the building utilized as a United States courthouse located at 150 

Reade Circle in Greenville, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Randy D. Doub United States 

Courthouse’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The building utilized as a United States courthouse located 

at 150 Reade Circle in Greenville, North Carolina, shall be known 

and designated as the ‘‘Randy D. Doub United States Courthouse’’ 

during the period in which the building is utilized as a United 

States courthouse. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

With respect to the period in which the building referred to 

in section 1 is utilized as a United States courthouse, any reference 

in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of 

the United States to that building shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Randy D. Doub United States Courthouse’’. 

Approved October 7, 2016. 

Oct. 7, 2016 

[H.R. 3937] 


kgrant on DSKB33CYQ1 with PUBLAW
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 12006E080

**Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version) - Part Three - Community policies - TITLE V - Transport - Article 80***Official Journal C 321 E , 29/12/2006 P. 0073 - 0073 Official Journal C 325 , 24/12/2002 P. 0064 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 340 , 10/11/1997 P. 0207 - Consolidated version Official Journal C 224 , 31/08/1992 P. 0028 - Consolidated version (EEC Treaty - no official publication available)*

Article 80

1. The provisions of this title shall apply to transport by rail, road and inland waterway.

2. The Council may, acting by a qualified majority, decide whether, to what extent and by what procedure appropriate provisions may be laid down for sea and air transport.

The procedural provisions of Article 71 shall apply.

--------------------------------------------------
### §669d. Apportionment; certification to States and Secretary of the Treasury; acceptance by States; disposition of funds not accepted

For each fiscal year, the Secretary of the Interior shall certify, at the time at which a deduction or apportionment is made, to the Secretary of the Treasury and to each State fish and game department the sum which he has estimated to be deducted for administering this chapter and the Migratory Bird Conservation Act [16 U.S.C. 715 et seq.] and the sum which he has apportioned to each State. Any State desiring to avail itself of the benefits of this chapter shall notify the Secretary of the Interior to this effect within sixty days after it has received the certification referred to in this section. The sum apportioned to any State which fails to notify the Secretary of the Interior as herein provided is authorized to be made available for expenditure by the Secretary of the Interior in carrying out the provisions of the Migratory Bird Conservation Act.

(Sept. 2, 1937, ch. 899, §5, 50 Stat. 918; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. II, §4(f), eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2731, 53 Stat. 1433; Pub. L. 91–503, title I, §102, Oct. 23, 1970, 84 Stat. 1098; Pub. L. 106–408, title I, §114, Nov. 1, 2000, 114 Stat. 1769.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Migratory Bird Conservation Act, referred to in text, is act Feb. 18, 1929, ch. 257, 45 Stat. 1222, which is classified generally to subchapter III (§715 et seq.) of chapter 7 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 715 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2000—Pub. L. 106–408 in first sentence inserted ", at the time at which a deduction or apportionment is made," after "certify" and struck out "and executing" after "for administering".

1970—Pub. L. 91–503 struck out requirement that apportionments be made by February 20 of each year preceding commencement of fiscal year in which funds would be used.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Reorg. Plan No. II of 1939, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, transferred functions of Secretary of Agriculture relating to conservation of wildlife, game, and migratory birds to Secretary of the Interior.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(a)
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED:
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Houston Industries
Incorporated's (i) Registration Statement on Form S-4 No. 333-11329, (ii)
Registration Statements on Form S-3 Nos. 33-46368, 33-54228, 333-20069,
333-32353, 333-33301, and 333-33303, (iii) Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement No. 33-51417 on Form S-3, (iv) Registration Statements on
Form S-8 Nos. 333-32413, and 333-32585 and (v) Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to
Registration No. 333-11329-99 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 20, 1998
(relating to the consolidated financial statements of Houston Industries
Incorporated) appearing on this Combined Annual Report on Form 10-K of Houston
Industries Incorporated and NorAm Energy Corp. for the year ended December 31,
1997.
 
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
HOUSTON, TEXAS
MARCH 23, 1998
#### In the Matter of Daniel Cunningham.

Motion granted unless appellant complies with terms stated in order. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          27,624
<SECURITIES>                                     7,040
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,093
<ALLOWANCES>                                        77
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,739
<PP&E>                                           2,723
<DEPRECIATION>                                     194
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,286
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,882
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,359
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,286
<SALES>                                          2,712
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,712
<CGS>                                            3,868
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,369
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (1,209)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9,448)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (9,448)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (9,448)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.75)


</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 211/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 211 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6221 June 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 211

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6221 June 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 211/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| 2019/C 211/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 6 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2019/C 211/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

2019/C 211/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Realty Investors, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with
Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chairman of the Board and the Controller (Acting Principal Financial and Accounting Officer), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                                    
|------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 16, 2005 |  | /s/ Ted P. Stokely                                 
|                   |  | Ted P. Stokely                                     
|                   |  | Chairman of the Board                              
|                   | 
|                   |  | /s/ Allen M. Wilson, Jr.                           
|                   |  | Allen M. Wilson, Jr.                               
|                   |  | Controller                                         
|                   |  | (Acting Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### John E. Keilly, Appellant, v. Samuel D. Schamarock, Respondent.

Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.
§ 303.432 Adoption of State complaint procedures. ( a ) *General.* Each lead agency must adopt written procedures for— ( 1 ) Resolving any complaint, including a complaint filed by an organization or individual from another State, that meets the requirements in § 303.434 by providing for the filing of a complaint with the lead agency; and
( 2 ) Widely disseminating to parents and other interested individuals, including parent training and information centers, Protection and Advocacy (P&A) agencies, and other appropriate entities, the State procedures under §§ 303.432 through 303.434.
( b ) *Remedies for denial of appropriate services.* In resolving a complaint in which the lead agency has found a failure to provide appropriate services, the lead agency, pursuant to its general supervisory authority under part C of the Act, must address— ( 1 ) The failure to provide appropriate services, including corrective actions appropriate to address the needs of the infant or toddler with a disability who is the subject of the complaint and the infant's or toddler's family (such as compensatory services or monetary reimbursement); and
( 2 ) Appropriate future provision of services for all infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families.
(Approved by Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-NEW) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1439(a)(1))
AHMAD GARY SHEAFFERS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-3949

____________________________/

Opinion filed September 19, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Ross M. Goodman, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, M. J. Lord, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Robert Quentin Humphrey, Assistant

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of one count of shooting at, into or within a 

building; one count of shooting or discharging a firearm from a vehicle; and two 

counts of aggravated assault by threat with firearm. As to the aggravated assaults, 

the jury found beyond a reasonable doubt that Appellant actually fired shots at both 
2

victims. At the time Appellant was sentenced, prevailing case law required the 

trial court to impose consecutively the two 20-year mandatory minimums for the 

aggravated assaults. 

Appellant does not challenge his convictions on appeal, but instead raises

the issue of whether the mandatory portions of his sentence were required to be 

imposed consecutively. While this appeal was pending, the Florida Supreme Court 

released its opinion in Williams v. State, holding that when “multiple firearm 

offenses are committed contemporaneously, during which time multiple victims 

are shot at, then consecutive sentencing is permissible but not mandatory.” 186 

So. 3d 989, 993 (Fla. 2016). The supreme court reasoned that whether to impose 

sentences arising from the same criminal episode consecutively or concurrently 

was well within the sentencing judge’s traditional discretionary function. Id.

Accordingly, while we affirm Appellant’s convictions, we reverse and 

remand for resentencing consistent with the direction set out in Williams. 

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED. 

WOLF, B.L. THOMAS, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
Molecular Structure
#### In the Matter of Gino Rudolph Cobos, Appellant, et al., Petitioners, v Robert Dennison, as Chairman of New York State Division of Parole, et al., Respondents.

[825 NYS2d 332]

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Orleans County (James E Punch, A.J.), entered September 7, 2005 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner Gino Rudolph Cobos contends that the standards for parole release determinations under Executive Law § 259-i are unconstitutional because they do not differentiate between adult offenders and offenders who committed crimes when they were less than 18 years of age, relying on *Roper v Simmons*(543 US 551 [2005]). The decision of the United States Supreme Court in *Roper*was limited to death penalty statutes as applied to juvenile offenders and we see no reason to apply the holding of *Roper*to parole release determinations. In any event, the statutory framework regarding discretionary parole decisions allows the Parole Board to consider “any mitigating and aggravating factors” associated with the offense and thus allows the Parole Board to consider an ofr fender’s juvenile status when making parole release determinations (Executive Law § 259-i [1] [a]; *see*§ 259-i [2] [c] [A]). Present—Kehoe, J.P., Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.