UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 99891 / April 3, 2024

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-21872

In the Matter of

IONIX TECHNOLOGY, INC.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On February 29, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued an order 

instituting proceedings (“OIP”) against Ionix Technology, Inc. (“Respondent”) pursuant to 

Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.1 On March 14, 2024, the Division of 

Enforcement filed a Declaration of Gina Joyce, which established that, pursuant to Commission 

Rule of Practice 141(a)(2)(ii),2service of the OIP was made on Respondent on March 6, 2024.

As stated in the OIP, Respondent’s answer was required to be filed within ten days after

service of the OIP.3 As of the date of this order, Respondent has not filed an answer. The 

prehearing conference and hearing are thus continued indefinitely.

Accordingly, Respondent is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE by April 17, 2024, why the 

registration of its securities should not be revoked by default due to its failure to file an answer or

otherwise to defend this proceeding. Respondent’s submission shall address the reasons for its 

failure to timely file an answer and include a proposed answer to be accepted in the event that the 

Commission does not enter a default against Respondent. When a party defaults, the allegations 

in the OIP will be deemed to be true and the Commission may determine the proceeding against 

that party upon consideration of the record without holding a public hearing. 

If Respondent fails to respond to this order to show cause, it may be deemed in default, 

the proceeding may be determined against it, and the registration of its securities may be 

1

Ionix Tech., Inc., Exchange Act Release No. 99630, 2024 WL 893525 (Feb. 29, 2024).

2

17 C.F.R. § 201.141(a)(2)(ii).

3

Ionix, 2024 WL 893525, at *2; Rules of Practice 151(a), 160(b), 220(b), 17 C.F.R. 

§§ 201.151(a), 201.160(b), 201.220(b).
2

revoked.4 Upon review of the filings in response to this order, the Commission will either direct 

further proceedings by subsequent order or issue a final order resolving the matter.

The parties’ attention is directed to the e-filing requirements in the Rules of Practice.

5

 

We also remind the parties that any document filed with the Commission must be served upon all 

participants in the proceeding and be accompanied by a certificate of service.6

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary

4 Rules of Practice 155, 180, 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.155, 201.180; see Ionix, 2024 WL 893525,

at *2 (“If Respondent fails to file the directed Answer, . . . [it] may be deemed in default and the 

proceedings may be determined against [it] . . . .”).

5

See Rules of Practice 151, 152(a), 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.151, .152(a) (providing procedure for 

filing papers with the Commission and mandating electronic filing in the form and manner 

posted on the Commission’s website); Instructions for Electronic Filing and Service of 

Documents in SEC Administrative Proceedings and Technical Specifications, 

https://www.sec.gov/efapdocs/instructions.pdf. Parties generally also must certify that they have 

redacted or omitted sensitive personal information from any filing. Rule of Practice 151(e), 

17 C.F.R. § 201.151(e).

6

See Rule of Practice 150, 17 C.F.R. § 201.150 (generally requiring parties to serve each 

other with their filings); Rule of Practice 151(d), 17 C.F.R. § 201.151(d) (“Papers filed with the 

Commission . . . shall be accompanied by a certificate stating the name of the person or persons 

served, the date of service, the method of service, and the mailing address or email address to 

which service was made, if not made in person.”).