# Official Journal C 262/10 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 262 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6310 August 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 262

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6310 August 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2020/C 262/01 | Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2020/C 262/01

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2020/C 262/02 | Case C-301/18: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Bonn — Germany) — Thomas Leonhard v DSL-Bank — a branch of DB Privat- und Firmenkundenbank AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2002/65/EC — Distance loan agreement — Right of withdrawal — Consequences — Article 7(4) — Return of the services received — Payment of compensation for benefit of use — Supplier’s obligation — Precluded) | 2 |
| 2020/C 262/03 | Case C-456/18 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 June 2020 — Hungary v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Alleged aid — Decision to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 108(2) TFEU — Suspension injunction in respect of the measures at issue — Conditions governing the legality of the injunction) | 3 |
| 2020/C 262/04 | Case C-588/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Nacional — Spain) — Federación de Trabajadores Independientes de Comercio (Fetico), Federación Estatal de Servicios, Movilidad y Consumo de la Unión General de Trabajadores (FESMC-UGT), Federación de Servicios de Comisiones Obreras (CCOO) v Grupo de Empresas DIA SA, Twins Alimentación SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Protection of the safety and health of workers — Organisation of working time — Directive 2003/88/EC — Articles 5 and 7 — Weekly rest — Annual leave — Paid special leave permitting time off from work to meet specific needs and obligations) | 3 |
| 2020/C 262/05 | Case C-812/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 June 2020 — Terna SpA v European Commission (Appeal — Energy — Projects of common interest to the EU — EU financial assistance granted to two projects in the field of trans-European energy networks — Directive 2004/17/EC — Article 37 — Subcontracting — Article 40(3)(c) — Direct award — Technical specificity — Framework agreement — Reduction of the assistance originally granted following a financial audit — Reimbursement of amounts originally paid) | 4 |
| 2020/C 262/06 | Case C-828/18: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de commerce de Paris — France) — Trendsetteuse SARL v DCA SARL (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Self-employed commercial agents — Directive 86/653/EEC — Concept of ‘commercial agent’ — Negotiation of the sale or purchase of goods on behalf of the principal — Intermediary lacking the power to change the conditions of sale and the prices of the goods that intermediary sells) | 5 |
| 2020/C 262/07 | Case C-3/19: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Asmel societá consortile a r.l. v A.N.A.C. — Autorità Nazionale Anticorruzione (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2004/18/EC — Central purchasing bodies — Small municipalities — Restriction to only two organisational models for the central purchasing bodies — Prohibition of use of a central purchasing body under private law and with the participation of private entities — Territorial restriction of the activity of central purchasing bodies) | 5 |
| 2020/C 262/08 | Case C-41/19: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln — Germany) — FX v GZ, represented for legal purposes by her mother (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters relating to maintenance obligations — Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 — Article 41(1) — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 24(5) — Maintenance order declared enforceable — Application opposing enforcement — Jurisdiction of the court of the Member State of enforcement) | 6 |
| 2020/C 262/09 | Case C-187/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 June 2020 — European External Action Service v Stéphane De Loecker (Appeal — Civil Service — European External Action Service (EEAS) — Member of the temporary staff — Psychological harassment — Request for assistance — Rejection of the request — Action for annulment and damages — Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to be heard — Article 266 TFEU — Compliance with the annulling judgment) | 7 |
| 2020/C 262/10 | Case C-310/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2020 — Boudewijn Schokker v European Union Aviation Safety Agency (Appeal — Civil service — Contract staff — Recruitment procedure — Classification in grade — Conditions of Employment of Other Servants — Article 86 — European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) — General implementing provisions — Challenge of the proposed classification — Withdrawal of the offer of employment — Action for compensation — Principle of sound administration — Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff — Breach of administrative duty — Non-contractual liability of the European Union — Non-material damage — Compensation) | 7 |
| 2020/C 262/11 | Case C-429/19: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Koblenz — Germany) — Remondis GmbH v Abfallzweckverband Rhein-Mosel-Eifel (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 12(4) — Scope — Public contracts between entities within the public sector — Definition of ‘cooperation’ — None) | 8 |
| 2020/C 262/12 | Case C-430/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Cluj — Romania) — SC C.F. SRL v A.J.F.P.M. and D.G.R.F.P.C (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Principles of EU law — Observance of the rights of the defence — Tax procedure — Exercise of the right to deduct with regard to value added tax (VAT) — Refusal of the right to deduct on account of the allegedly improper conduct of the taxable person’s suppliers — Administrative act issued by the national tax authorities without giving the taxpayer access to the information and the documents on which the act was based — Suspicion of tax evasion — National practice pursuant to which exercise of the right to deduct is subject to the possession of supporting documents other than the tax invoice — Whether permissible) | 8 |
| 2020/C 262/13 | Case C-495/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Poznaniu — Poland) — Kancelaria Medius SA z siedzibą w Krakowie v RN (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Article 7(1) — Consumer credit — Review of whether the contractual terms are unfair — Failure of the consumer to appear at the hearing — Scope of the court’s powers and obligations) | 9 |
| 2020/C 262/14 | Case C-138/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 13 March 2020 — O. v P. AG | 10 |
| 2020/C 262/15 | Case C-168/20: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales (United Kingdom) made on 22 April 2020 — Joint Trustee (1) in Bankruptcy of Mr M. and Joint Trustee (2) in Bankruptcy of Mr M. v Mrs M, MH, ILA and Mr M | 12 |
| 2020/C 262/16 | Case C-185/20 P: Appeal brought on 28 April 2020 by Hungary against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 12 February 2020 in Case T-505/18, Hungary v European Commission | 13 |
| 2020/C 262/17 | Case C-194/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 8 May 2020 — BY, CX, FU, DW, EV v Stadt Duisburg | 14 |
| 2020/C 262/18 | Case C-206/20: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) (United Kingdom) made on 15 May 2020 — VA v Prosecutor of the regional prosecutor’s office in Ruse, Bulgaria | 14 |
| 2020/C 262/19 | Case C-209/20: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 22 May 2020 — Renesola UK Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs | 15 |
| 2020/C 262/20 | Case C-211/20 P: Appeal brought on 22 May 2020 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 12 March 2020 in Case T-732/16, Valencia Club de Fútbol v European Commission | 16 |
| 2020/C 262/21 | Case C-214/20: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Labour Court, Ireland, made on 20 May 2020 — MG v Dublin City Council | 16 |
| 2020/C 262/22 | Case C-221/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 28 May 2020 — A Oy | 17 |
| 2020/C 262/23 | Case C-223/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 28 May 2020 — B Oy | 18 |
| 2020/C 262/24 | Case C-234/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 4 June 2020 — SIA ‘Sātiņi-S’ v Lauku atbalsta dienests | 18 |
| 2020/C 262/25 | Case C-238/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 5 June 2020 — SIA ‘Sātiņi-S’ v Dabas aizsardzības pārvalde | 19 |
| 2020/C 262/26 | Case C-242/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske (Croatia) lodged on 8 June 2020 — HRVATSKE Šume d.o.o., Zagreb, as the legal successor to HRVATSKE ŠUME javno poduzeće za gospodarenje šumama i šumskim zemljištima u Republici Hrvatskoj, p.o. Zagreb v BP EUROPA SE, as the legal successor to DEUTSCHE BP AG, as the legal successor to THE BURMAH OIL (Deutschland), GmbH | 20 |
| | General Court |
| 2020/C 262/27 | Case T-506/18: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2020 –Poland v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Specific support for the tobacco sector — Expenditure incurred by Poland — Key controls — Flat-rate corrections — Obligation to state reasons) | 21 |
| 2020/C 262/28 | Case T-104/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2020 — Dermavita v EUIPO — Allergan Holdings France (JUVÉDERM) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark JUVÉDERM — Genuine use of the mark — Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered — Use in the form in which the mark was registered — Use with the proprietor’s consent — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 21 |
| 2020/C 262/29 | Case T-379/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2020 — Serviceplan Gruppe für innovative Kommunikation v EUIPO (Serviceplan) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark Serviceplan — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) | 22 |
| 2020/C 262/30 | Case T-380/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2020 — Serviceplan Gruppe für innovative Kommunikation v EUIPO (Serviceplan Solutions) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark Serviceplan Solutions — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) | 23 |
| 2020/C 262/31 | Case T-552/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2020 — Malacalza Investimenti v ECB (Access to documents — Decision of the ECB to place Banca Carige SpA under temporary administration — Refusal to grant access — Default procedure) | 23 |
| 2020/C 262/32 | Case T-294/19: Order of the General Court of 11 June 2020 — Vanhoudt and Others v EIB (Action for annulment and for damages — Civil service — EIB staff — Reform of the EIB remuneration and salary progression system — Remuneration simulation tool — Act not open to challenge — Purely confirmatory act — No new and substantial facts — Non-material harm — No causal link — Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law) | 24 |
| 2020/C 262/33 | Case T-516/19: Order of the General Court of 11 June 2020 — VDV eTicket Service v Commission and INEA (Arbitration clause — ‘Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation’ (2014-2020) — Project ‘European Travellers Club: Account-Based Travelling across the European Union — ETC’ — Grant agreement — Decision of INEA declaring ineligible certain costs incurred in the context of subcontracts — Misidentification of the defendant — Measure which is part of a purely contractual context from which it is inseparable — Legitimate expectations — Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law) | 25 |
| 2020/C 262/34 | Case T-563/19: Order of the General Court of 11 June 2020 — Perfect Bar v EUIPO (PERFECT Bar) (Action for annulment — EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark PERFECT Bar — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Descriptive character– Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision — Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law) | 25 |
| 2020/C 262/35 | Case T-803/19: Order of the General Court of 16 June 2020 — etc-gaming and Casino-Equipment v Commission (Action for damages — Failure by the European Union to introduce an effective remedy offering suitable redress for a failure on the part of the national courts to submit a request for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law) | 26 |
| 2020/C 262/36 | Case T-91/20: Action brought on 15 May 2020 — WT v Commission | 26 |
| 2020/C 262/37 | Case T-188/20: Action brought on 26 March 2020 — Close and Cegelec v Parliament | 27 |
| 2020/C 262/38 | Case T-250/20: Action brought on 29 April 2020 — Moviescreens Rental v EUIPO — the airscreen company (AIRSCREEN) | 28 |
| 2020/C 262/39 | Case T-298/20: Action brought on 22 May 2020 — KD v EUIPO | 29 |
| 2020/C 262/40 | Case T-299/20: Action brought on 20 May 2020 — KF v EIB | 29 |
| 2020/C 262/41 | Case T-308/20: Action brought on 18 May 2020 — PL v Commission | 30 |
| 2020/C 262/42 | Case T-342/20: Action brought on 2 June 2020 — Indo European Foods v EUIPO — Chakari (Abresham Super Basmati Selaa Grade One World's Best Rice) | 31 |
| 2020/C 262/43 | Case T-353/20: Action brought on 3 June 2020 — AC Milan v EUIPO — InterES (ACM 1899 AC MILAN) | 32 |
| 2020/C 262/44 | Case T-354/20: Action brought on 4 June 2020 — Kfz-Gewerbe v EUIPO — The Blink Fish (Representation of a fish) | 33 |
| 2020/C 262/45 | Case T-372/20: Action brought on 15 June 2020 — Dermavita Company v EUIPO — Allergan Holdings France (JUVEDERM) | 33 |
| 2020/C 262/46 | Case T-376/20: Action brought on 15 June 2020 — Poupart v Commission | 34 |
| 2020/C 262/47 | Case T-383/20: Action brought on 16 June 2020 — Moloko Beverage v EUIPO — Nexus Liquids (moloko) | 35 |
| 2020/C 262/48 | Case T-387/20: Action brought on 23 June 2020 — DK Company v EUIPO — Hunter Boot (DENIM HUNTER) | 35 |
| 2020/C 262/49 | Case T-388/20: Action brought on 26 June 2020 — Ryanair v Commission | 36 |
| 2020/C 262/50 | Case T-400/20: Action brought on 29 June 2020 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Rudolf Böckenholt (LLOYD’S) | 37 |
| 2020/C 262/51 | Case T-23/19: Order of the General Court of 8 June 2020 — Limango v EUIPO — Consolidated Artists (limango) | 38 |
| 2020/C 262/52 | Case T-534/19: Order of the General Court of 8 June 2020 — TestBioTech v Commission | 38 |
| 2020/C 262/53 | Case T-612/19: Order of the General Court of 4 June 2020 — UPL Europe and Aceto Agricultural Chemicals v Commission | 38 |
| 2020/C 262/54 | Case T-708/19: Order of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — Bujar v Commission | 38 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2020/C 262/02

Case C-301/18: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Bonn — Germany) — Thomas Leonhard v DSL-Bank — a branch of DB Privat- und Firmenkundenbank AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2002/65/EC — Distance loan agreement — Right of withdrawal — Consequences — Article 7(4) — Return of the services received — Payment of compensation for benefit of use — Supplier’s obligation — Precluded)

2

2020/C 262/03

Case C-456/18 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 June 2020 — Hungary v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Alleged aid — Decision to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 108(2) TFEU — Suspension injunction in respect of the measures at issue — Conditions governing the legality of the injunction)

3

2020/C 262/04

Case C-588/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Nacional — Spain) — Federación de Trabajadores Independientes de Comercio (Fetico), Federación Estatal de Servicios, Movilidad y Consumo de la Unión General de Trabajadores (FESMC-UGT), Federación de Servicios de Comisiones Obreras (CCOO) v Grupo de Empresas DIA SA, Twins Alimentación SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Protection of the safety and health of workers — Organisation of working time — Directive 2003/88/EC — Articles 5 and 7 — Weekly rest — Annual leave — Paid special leave permitting time off from work to meet specific needs and obligations)

3

2020/C 262/05

Case C-812/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 June 2020 — Terna SpA v European Commission (Appeal — Energy — Projects of common interest to the EU — EU financial assistance granted to two projects in the field of trans-European energy networks — Directive 2004/17/EC — Article 37 — Subcontracting — Article 40(3)(c) — Direct award — Technical specificity — Framework agreement — Reduction of the assistance originally granted following a financial audit — Reimbursement of amounts originally paid)

4

2020/C 262/06

Case C-828/18: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de commerce de Paris — France) — Trendsetteuse SARL v DCA SARL (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Self-employed commercial agents — Directive 86/653/EEC — Concept of ‘commercial agent’ — Negotiation of the sale or purchase of goods on behalf of the principal — Intermediary lacking the power to change the conditions of sale and the prices of the goods that intermediary sells)

5

2020/C 262/07

Case C-3/19: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Asmel societá consortile a r.l. v A.N.A.C. — Autorità Nazionale Anticorruzione (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2004/18/EC — Central purchasing bodies — Small municipalities — Restriction to only two organisational models for the central purchasing bodies — Prohibition of use of a central purchasing body under private law and with the participation of private entities — Territorial restriction of the activity of central purchasing bodies)

5

2020/C 262/08

Case C-41/19: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln — Germany) — FX v GZ, represented for legal purposes by her mother (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters relating to maintenance obligations — Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 — Article 41(1) — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 24(5) — Maintenance order declared enforceable — Application opposing enforcement — Jurisdiction of the court of the Member State of enforcement)

6

2020/C 262/09

Case C-187/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 June 2020 — European External Action Service v Stéphane De Loecker (Appeal — Civil Service — European External Action Service (EEAS) — Member of the temporary staff — Psychological harassment — Request for assistance — Rejection of the request — Action for annulment and damages — Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to be heard — Article 266 TFEU — Compliance with the annulling judgment)

7

2020/C 262/10

Case C-310/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2020 — Boudewijn Schokker v European Union Aviation Safety Agency (Appeal — Civil service — Contract staff — Recruitment procedure — Classification in grade — Conditions of Employment of Other Servants — Article 86 — European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) — General implementing provisions — Challenge of the proposed classification — Withdrawal of the offer of employment — Action for compensation — Principle of sound administration — Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff — Breach of administrative duty — Non-contractual liability of the European Union — Non-material damage — Compensation)

7

2020/C 262/11

Case C-429/19: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Koblenz — Germany) — Remondis GmbH v Abfallzweckverband Rhein-Mosel-Eifel (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 12(4) — Scope — Public contracts between entities within the public sector — Definition of ‘cooperation’ — None)

8

2020/C 262/12

Case C-430/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Cluj — Romania) — SC C.F. SRL v A.J.F.P.M. and D.G.R.F.P.C (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Principles of EU law — Observance of the rights of the defence — Tax procedure — Exercise of the right to deduct with regard to value added tax (VAT) — Refusal of the right to deduct on account of the allegedly improper conduct of the taxable person’s suppliers — Administrative act issued by the national tax authorities without giving the taxpayer access to the information and the documents on which the act was based — Suspicion of tax evasion — National practice pursuant to which exercise of the right to deduct is subject to the possession of supporting documents other than the tax invoice — Whether permissible)

8

2020/C 262/13

Case C-495/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Poznaniu — Poland) — Kancelaria Medius SA z siedzibą w Krakowie v RN (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Article 7(1) — Consumer credit — Review of whether the contractual terms are unfair — Failure of the consumer to appear at the hearing — Scope of the court’s powers and obligations)

9

2020/C 262/14

Case C-138/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 13 March 2020 — O. v P. AG

10

2020/C 262/15

Case C-168/20: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales (United Kingdom) made on 22 April 2020 — Joint Trustee (1) in Bankruptcy of Mr M. and Joint Trustee (2) in Bankruptcy of Mr M. v Mrs M, MH, ILA and Mr M

12

2020/C 262/16

Case C-185/20 P: Appeal brought on 28 April 2020 by Hungary against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 12 February 2020 in Case T-505/18, Hungary v European Commission

13

2020/C 262/17

Case C-194/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 8 May 2020 — BY, CX, FU, DW, EV v Stadt Duisburg

14

2020/C 262/18

Case C-206/20: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) (United Kingdom) made on 15 May 2020 — VA v Prosecutor of the regional prosecutor’s office in Ruse, Bulgaria

14

2020/C 262/19

Case C-209/20: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 22 May 2020 — Renesola UK Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs

15

2020/C 262/20

Case C-211/20 P: Appeal brought on 22 May 2020 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 12 March 2020 in Case T-732/16, Valencia Club de Fútbol v European Commission

16

2020/C 262/21

Case C-214/20: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Labour Court, Ireland, made on 20 May 2020 — MG v Dublin City Council

16

2020/C 262/22

Case C-221/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 28 May 2020 — A Oy

17

2020/C 262/23

Case C-223/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 28 May 2020 — B Oy

18

2020/C 262/24

Case C-234/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 4 June 2020 — SIA ‘Sātiņi-S’ v Lauku atbalsta dienests

18

2020/C 262/25

Case C-238/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 5 June 2020 — SIA ‘Sātiņi-S’ v Dabas aizsardzības pārvalde

19

2020/C 262/26

Case C-242/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Visoki trgovački sud Republike Hrvatske (Croatia) lodged on 8 June 2020 — HRVATSKE Šume d.o.o., Zagreb, as the legal successor to HRVATSKE ŠUME javno poduzeće za gospodarenje šumama i šumskim zemljištima u Republici Hrvatskoj, p.o. Zagreb v BP EUROPA SE, as the legal successor to DEUTSCHE BP AG, as the legal successor to THE BURMAH OIL (Deutschland), GmbH

20

General Court

2020/C 262/27

Case T-506/18: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2020 –Poland v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Specific support for the tobacco sector — Expenditure incurred by Poland — Key controls — Flat-rate corrections — Obligation to state reasons)

21

2020/C 262/28

Case T-104/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2020 — Dermavita v EUIPO — Allergan Holdings France (JUVÉDERM) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark JUVÉDERM — Genuine use of the mark — Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered — Use in the form in which the mark was registered — Use with the proprietor’s consent — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

21

2020/C 262/29

Case T-379/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2020 — Serviceplan Gruppe für innovative Kommunikation v EUIPO (Serviceplan) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark Serviceplan — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

22

2020/C 262/30

Case T-380/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2020 — Serviceplan Gruppe für innovative Kommunikation v EUIPO (Serviceplan Solutions) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark Serviceplan Solutions — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

23

2020/C 262/31

Case T-552/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2020 — Malacalza Investimenti v ECB (Access to documents — Decision of the ECB to place Banca Carige SpA under temporary administration — Refusal to grant access — Default procedure)

23

2020/C 262/32

Case T-294/19: Order of the General Court of 11 June 2020 — Vanhoudt and Others v EIB (Action for annulment and for damages — Civil service — EIB staff — Reform of the EIB remuneration and salary progression system — Remuneration simulation tool — Act not open to challenge — Purely confirmatory act — No new and substantial facts — Non-material harm — No causal link — Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

24

2020/C 262/33

Case T-516/19: Order of the General Court of 11 June 2020 — VDV eTicket Service v Commission and INEA (Arbitration clause — ‘Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation’ (2014-2020) — Project ‘European Travellers Club: Account-Based Travelling across the European Union — ETC’ — Grant agreement — Decision of INEA declaring ineligible certain costs incurred in the context of subcontracts — Misidentification of the defendant — Measure which is part of a purely contractual context from which it is inseparable — Legitimate expectations — Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

25

2020/C 262/34

Case T-563/19: Order of the General Court of 11 June 2020 — Perfect Bar v EUIPO (PERFECT Bar) (Action for annulment — EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark PERFECT Bar — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Descriptive character– Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision — Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

25

2020/C 262/35

Case T-803/19: Order of the General Court of 16 June 2020 — etc-gaming and Casino-Equipment v Commission (Action for damages — Failure by the European Union to introduce an effective remedy offering suitable redress for a failure on the part of the national courts to submit a request for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

26

2020/C 262/36

Case T-91/20: Action brought on 15 May 2020 — WT v Commission

26

2020/C 262/37

Case T-188/20: Action brought on 26 March 2020 — Close and Cegelec v Parliament

27

2020/C 262/38

Case T-250/20: Action brought on 29 April 2020 — Moviescreens Rental v EUIPO — the airscreen company (AIRSCREEN)

28

2020/C 262/39

Case T-298/20: Action brought on 22 May 2020 — KD v EUIPO

29

2020/C 262/40

Case T-299/20: Action brought on 20 May 2020 — KF v EIB

29

2020/C 262/41

Case T-308/20: Action brought on 18 May 2020 — PL v Commission

30

2020/C 262/42

Case T-342/20: Action brought on 2 June 2020 — Indo European Foods v EUIPO — Chakari (Abresham Super Basmati Selaa Grade One World's Best Rice)

31

2020/C 262/43

Case T-353/20: Action brought on 3 June 2020 — AC Milan v EUIPO — InterES (ACM 1899 AC MILAN)

32

2020/C 262/44

Case T-354/20: Action brought on 4 June 2020 — Kfz-Gewerbe v EUIPO — The Blink Fish (Representation of a fish)

33

2020/C 262/45

Case T-372/20: Action brought on 15 June 2020 — Dermavita Company v EUIPO — Allergan Holdings France (JUVEDERM)

33

2020/C 262/46

Case T-376/20: Action brought on 15 June 2020 — Poupart v Commission

34

2020/C 262/47

Case T-383/20: Action brought on 16 June 2020 — Moloko Beverage v EUIPO — Nexus Liquids (moloko)

35

2020/C 262/48

Case T-387/20: Action brought on 23 June 2020 — DK Company v EUIPO — Hunter Boot (DENIM HUNTER)

35

2020/C 262/49

Case T-388/20: Action brought on 26 June 2020 — Ryanair v Commission

36

2020/C 262/50

Case T-400/20: Action brought on 29 June 2020 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Rudolf Böckenholt (LLOYD’S)

37

2020/C 262/51

Case T-23/19: Order of the General Court of 8 June 2020 — Limango v EUIPO — Consolidated Artists (limango)

38

2020/C 262/52

Case T-534/19: Order of the General Court of 8 June 2020 — TestBioTech v Commission

38

2020/C 262/53

Case T-612/19: Order of the General Court of 4 June 2020 — UPL Europe and Aceto Agricultural Chemicals v Commission

38

2020/C 262/54

Case T-708/19: Order of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — Bujar v Commission

38

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN