alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 81627 / September 14, 2017

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-18114

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

 :

Institutional Investors Advisory : ORDER APPOINTING

Company : TAX ADMINISTRATOR

:

:

Respondent. :

___________________________________ :

By order dated June 30, 2017, the Commission issued the “Omnibus Order Directing the 

Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that Establish Distribution 

Funds” (“Omnibus Order”),1authorizing the Secretary to issue orders beginning June 2017 and for 

calendar year 2018 appointing, upon request by the Commission staff, Miller Kaplan Arase LLP, a 

certified public accounting firm, which acquired Damasco & Associates LLP (“Miller Kaplan”), 

with one of their offices located in Half Moon Bay, California, as tax administrator (“Tax 

Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund may incur tax-related 

obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department of the Treasury 

Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On September 13, 2017, the Commission staff requested the appointment of Miller 

Kaplan as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Miller Kaplan, pursuant to and in accordance with the 

Omnibus Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Brent J. Fields

Secretary

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 81057 (June 30, 2017).
1870 Cordell Court, Suite 202 El Cajon, CA 92020

P. (619) 258

- 3670 F. (619) 258

- 3674

www.ea stcountyedc.org 

### San Diego East County Economic Development Council

March 16, 2012

The Honorable Ray LaHood
U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590
Re: Alaska Airlines’ application for SAN

- DC A, Docket No. DOT

- OST

- 2012

- 0029

Dear Secretary LaHood :
The East County Economic Development Council (East County EDC) supports the application of Alaska Airlines for air service between San Diego and Washington Reagan Nati onal Ai rport (DCA) . San Diego is the largest region without direct service to DCA

. Additionally, due to the profound communi ty of interest between San Diego and the nation’s capital, the region generates the largest passenger market demand without nonstop service to the most convenient airport serving our nation’s capital

. San Diego’s sheer market size to Washington coupled w ith the fact that San Diego

- to

- Dulles average airfares are the highest of west coast cities

, s hould qualify it for the limited slots available for this flight

. The high airfare is exacerbated when factoring in taxi fares from Dulles to Washington’s city c enter that
average about $ 6 0 each way. This means travelers between Washington’s city center and San Diego via Dulles can pay on average close to $400 one

- way

. Since 2000, East County EDC has been the recipient of Department of Defense contracts and other Federa l a gency grants that have required trips to DC. The choice between the financial burden of airfare and ground transportation of a Dulles flight and the logistical burden of a less expensive flight to Baltimore

- Washington International airport is a difficult one for a non

- profit organization.
There are countless other San Diego

- based and Washington

- based businesses that are engaged in health science, telecommunications, and national defense that need quick and convenient access to Reagan National A irport

. Alaska Airlines service would add a needed nonstop option to a primary Washington, DC gateway

. East County EDC joins with the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority, the San Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation, the World Trade Ce nter San Diego, and the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce in support of Alaska Airlines’ application for San Diego

– Washington Reagan National slots.

We thank the Department of Transportation for the opportunity to comment on the above referenced do cket and we hope to hear of a favorable review of Alaska Airlines’ San Diego

– DCA proposal soon.
Sincerely,

Jo Marie Diamond President and CEO1870 Cordell Court, Suite 202 El Cajon, CA 92020

P. (619) 258

- 3670 F. (619) 258

- 3674

www.ea stcountyedc.org 

### San Diego East County Economic Development Council
#### §§ 200.101-200.102 [Reserved]
### §90a. Ross Lake National Recreation Area; establishment; statement of purposes; description of area

In order to provide for the public outdoor recreation use and enjoyment of portions of the Skagit River and Ross, Diablo, and Gorge Lakes, together with the surrounding lands, and for the conservation of the scenic, scientific, historic, and other values contributing to public enjoyment of such lands and waters, there is hereby established, subject to valid existing rights, the Ross Lake National Recreation Area (hereinafter referred to in this subchapter as the "recreation area"). The recreation area shall consist of the lands and waters within the area designated "Ross Lake National Recreation Area" on the map referred to in section 90 of this title.

(Pub. L. 90–544, title II, §201, Oct. 2, 1968, 82 Stat. 927.)
### §718c. Authorization and exemption

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to authorize any person to take any migratory waterfowl otherwise than in accordance with regulations adopted and approved pursuant to any treaty or convention heretofore or hereafter entered into between the United States and any other country for the protection of migratory birds, nor to exempt any person from complying with the game laws of the several States.

(Mar. 16, 1934, ch. 71, §3, 48 Stat. 451; Pub. L. 95–616, §7(b), Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3114; Pub. L. 109–266, §10(d), Aug. 3, 2006, 120 Stat. 675.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–266 inserted section catchline.

1978—Pub. L. 95–616 inserted "or convention" after "treaty".
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4838 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to allow payments under 

the Medicare program for certain items and services furnished by offcampus outpatient departments of a provider to be determined under 

the prospective payment system for hospital outpatient department services, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 23, 2019 

Mr. MCGOVERN (for himself and Mr. SMITH of Nebraska) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to allow 

payments under the Medicare program for certain items 

and services furnished by off-campus outpatient departments of a provider to be determined under the prospective payment system for hospital outpatient department 

services, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4838 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SOS: Sustaining Out3 patient Services Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ALLOWING MEDICARE PAYMENTS FOR CERTAIN 

5 ITEMS AND SERVICES FURNISHED BY OFF6 CAMPUS OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENTS OF A 

7 PROVIDER TO BE DETERMINED UNDER THE 

8 PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM FOR HOS9 PITAL OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT SERVICES. 

10 Section 1833(t)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 

11 U.S.C. 1395l(t)(1)(B)) is amended— 

12 (1) in clause (iv), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

13 (2) in clause (v)— 

14 (A) by inserting before ‘‘does not include’’ 

15 the following: ‘‘subject to clause (vi),’’; and 

16 (B) by striking the period at the end and 

17 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

18 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

19 clause: 

20 ‘‘(vi) includes, with respect to a year 

21 (beginning with 2020), any item or serv22 ice— 

23 ‘‘(I) that is furnished during 

24 such year by an off-campus outpatient 

25 department of a provider (as defined 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4838 IH

1 in subparagraph (B) of paragraph 

2 (21)); and 

3 ‘‘(II) with respect to which the 

4 greatest total amount paid with re5 spect to a physician speciality under 

6 the physician fee schedule under sec7 tion 1848 for all such items or serv8 ices furnished by physicians in such 

9 specialty during the previous year was 

10 less than $2,000,000.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
§ 201.3 Appointment of judges and rules of procedure. ( a ) The Attorney General shall, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce, the Director of National Intelligence, and the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB), appoint not fewer than six individuals to serve as judges on the DPRC for four-year renewable terms, choosing individuals who at the time of their initial appointment have not been employees of the executive branch in the previous two years.
( b ) The Attorney General's appointments shall be informed by the criteria used by the executive branch in assessing candidates for the Federal judiciary, giving weight to any prior judicial experience, and shall be of individuals with appropriate experience in the fields of data privacy and national security law. The Attorney General shall endeavor to ensure that at least half of the judges at any given time have prior judicial experience, and all persons appointed as judges shall be active members in good standing of the bar of a State, Commonwealth, Territory, or Possession, or of the District of Columbia and shall be duly licensed to practice law.
( c ) During their term of appointment as judges on the DPRC, such judges shall not have any official duties or employment within the United States Government other than their official duties and employment as judges on the DPRC.
( d ) The DPRC shall review and adopt by majority vote rules of procedure consistent with the Executive order of October 7, 2022 and this part, which thereafter shall be made publicly available and applied by each DPRC panel convened under § 201.7(a). The rules of procedure may thereafter be amended at such times and in such ways as a majority of the judges may deem necessary and appropriate to accomplish the work of the DPRC. A quorum of six judges shall be required for the initial adoption of and any amendments to the rules of procedure.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-02-15T02:03:51-0500
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

In re:

ISAAC K. AMANKWAH,

Debtor.

Bankr. Case No. 18-13848-BFK

Chapter 7

JOHN P. FITZGERALD, III,

United States Trustee 

For Region Four,

Movant,

v.

ISAAC K. AMANKWAH,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This matter came before the court on the motion of the United States Trustee to dismiss 

this case under § 707(b)(1). For good cause having been shown, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the motion of the United States Trustee is hereby granted and this case is 

hereby dismissed.

ORDERED that a copy of this order be served by the clerk on the parties listed below.

Date: ______________________ ___________________________________

Brian F. Kenney

Bankruptcy Judge

Entered on Docket: ___________________

[signature on next page]

Case 18-13848-BFK Doc 14-1 Filed 01/28/19 Entered 01/28/19 13:06:12 Desc

 Proposed Order Page 1 of 2
I ask for this:

JOHN P. FITZGERALD, III

Acting United States Trustee 

For Region Four

By: /s/ Joseph A. Guzinski

Joseph A. Guzinski

Asst. United States Trustee

Office of the U.S. Trustee 

1725 Duke Street, Suite 650

Alexandria, Virginia 22314 

(703) 557-7274

Copies To:

Isaac K. Amankwah

7940 Bethelen Woods Lane 

Springfield, VA 22153

Debtor/Respondent

Lois Ilaine Upton

Upton Law Firm 

7369 McWhorter Place Suite 412 

Annandale, VA 22003

uptonbknotices@gmail.com

Counsel for Debtor/Respondent

Janet M. Meiburger

The Meiburger Law Firm, P.C. 

1493 Chain Bridge Road, Suite 201 

McLean, VA 22101-5726

trustee@meiburgerlaw.com

Chapter 7 Trustee

Office of the United States Trustee

115 S. Union St., Suite 210

Alexandria, VA 22314

Counsel for the United States Trustee

Case 18-13848-BFK Doc 14-1 Filed 01/28/19 Entered 01/28/19 13:06:12 Desc

 Proposed Order Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Ronald Croen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Nuance Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Nuance Communications, Inc.





By:

/s/    RONALD CROENRonald Croen, Chief Executive OfficerNovember 14, 2002





I, Karen Blasing, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Nuance Communications, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Nuance Communications, Inc.





By:

/s/    KAREN BLASINGKaren Blasing, Chief Financial OfficerNovember 14, 2002
Exhibit 32.1          DACTECHNOLOGIES GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a — 14(b) OR RULE 15d — 14(c) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350          In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of DAC Technologies Group InternationalInc (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), David A. Collins, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company./s/ David A. Collins, Chairman, CEO and Principal Executive Officer
### §760aa. Findings and purposes

#### (a) Findings

Congress finds the following:

(1) The National Fish Hatchery System (in this chapter referred to as the "System")—

(A) consists of more than 60 hatcheries, seven fish technology centers, 9 fish health centers, and other fisheries program offices;

(B) plays an integral role in the recovery of more than 50 threatened species and endangered species and the restoration of over 100 native species;

(C) provides healthy fish populations that support recreational fishing opportunities, many of which are related to Federal water control structures; and

(D) works with over 250 partners to help mitigate the impacts of aquatic habitat loss and invasive species.

(2) The System faces many challenges, including aging facilities, some of which date back to the late 1800s, and maintenance of intensive infrastructures such as wells, pumps, valves, pipes, filters, heaters, chillers, and treatment systems that must keep clean water moving 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.

(3) By encouraging volunteer programs and donations and fostering non-Federal partnerships with hatchery facilities, Federal funding for the hatcheries can be supplemented.

(4) By encouraging hatchery educational programs, public awareness of the resources of the System and public participation in the conservation of aquatic resources can be promoted.

#### (b) Purposes

The purposes of this chapter are the following:

(1) To encourage the use of volunteers to assist the United States Fish and Wildlife Service in the management of hatcheries within the System.

(2) To facilitate partnerships between the System and non-Federal entities to promote public awareness of the resources of the System and public participation in the conservation of those resources.

(3) To encourage donations and other contributions by individuals and organizations to the System.

(Pub. L. 109–360, §2, Oct. 16, 2006, 120 Stat. 2058.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 109–360, §1, Oct. 16, 2006, 120 Stat. 2058, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'National Fish Hatchery System Volunteer Act of 2006'."
###### Editorial Note on Part 1003

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1003 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10350, Mar. 5, 2003.

#### § 1003.34 Testimony.

Testimony of witnesses appearing at the hearing shall be under oath or affirmation.

[52 FR 2936, Jan. 29, 1987. Redesignated at 57 FR 11571, Apr. 6, 1992]
#### Annie E. Seaman, as Administratrix, etc., of Alanson H. Seaman, Deceased, Respondent, v. New York Telephone Company, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Stapleton, JJ.
### §973j. Reporting requirements; disclosure of information

(a) Holders of licenses shall comply with the reporting requirements of part 4 of Annex I to the Treaty.

(b) Information provided by license holders in Schedules 5 and 6 of Annex I of the Treaty shall be provided to the Secretary for transmittal to the Administrator and to an entity designated by the license holder. Such information thereafter shall not be released and shall be maintained as confidential by the Secretary, including information requested under the Freedom of Information Act [5 U.S.C. 552], unless disclosure is required under court order or unless the information is essential for an enforcement action under section 973c, 973h(b), 973h(c), or 973i of this title, or any other proper law enforcement action.

(Pub. L. 100–330, §12, June 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 599.)
§ 204.13 How can the International Broadcasting Bureau of the United States Broadcasting Board of Governors petition for a fourth preference special immigrant broadcaster? ( a ) *Which broadcasters qualify?* Under section 203(b)(4) of the Act, the International Broadcasting Bureau of the United States Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), or a grantee of the BBG, may petition for an alien (and the alien's accompanying spouse and children) to work as a broadcaster for the BBG or a grantee of the BBG in the United States. For the purposes of this section, the terms: *BBG grantee* means Radio Free Asia, Inc (RFA) or Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Inc. (RFE/RL); and
*Broadcaster* means a reporter, writer, translator, editor, producer or announcer for news broadcasts; hosts for news broadcasts, news analysis, editorial and other broadcast features; or a news analysis specialist. The term broadcaster does not include individuals performing purely technical or support services for the BBG or a BBG grantee.
( b ) *Is there a yearly limit on the number of visas available for alien broadcasters petitioned by the BBG or a BBG grantee?* ( 1 ) Under the provisions of section 203(b)(4) of the Act, a yearly limit of 100 fourth preference special immigrant visas are available to aliens intending to work as broadcasters in the United States for the BBG or a BBG grantee. These 100 visas are available in any fiscal year beginning on or after October 1, 2000.
( 2 ) The alien broadcaster's accompanying spouse and children are not counted towards the 100 special broadcaster visa limit.
( c ) *What form should the BBG use to petition for these special alien broadcasters?* The BBG or a BBG grantee shall use Form I-360, Petition for Amerasian, Widow(er), or Special Immigrant, to petition for an alien broadcaster. The petition must be submitted with the correct fee noted on the form.
( d ) *Will the BBG need to submit supplemental evidence with Form I-360 for alien broadcasters?* ( 1 ) All Form I-360 petitions submitted by the BBG or a BBG grantee on behalf of an alien for a broadcaster position with the BBG or BBG grantee must be accompanied by a signed and dated supplemental attestation that contains the following information about the prospective alien broadcaster: ( i ) The job title and a full description of the job to be performed; and
( ii ) The broadcasting expertise held by the alien, including how long the alien has been performing duties that relate to the prospective position or a statement as to how the alien possesses the necessary skills that make him or her qualified for the broadcasting-related position within the BBG or BBG grantee.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[66 FR 51821, Oct. 11, 2001, as amended at 74 FR 26937, June 5, 2009]
§ 300.30 Parent. ( a ) *Parent* means— ( 1 ) A biological or adoptive parent of a child;
( 2 ) A foster parent, unless State law, regulations, or contractual obligations with a State or local entity prohibit a foster parent from acting as a parent;
( 3 ) A guardian generally authorized to act as the child's parent, or authorized to make educational decisions for the child (but not the State if the child is a ward of the State);
( 4 ) An individual acting in the place of a biological or adoptive parent (including a grandparent, stepparent, or other relative) with whom the child lives, or an individual who is legally responsible for the child's welfare; or
( 5 ) A surrogate parent who has been appointed in accordance with § 300.519 or section 639(a)(5) of the Act.
( b ) ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the biological or adoptive parent, when attempting to act as the parent under this part and when more than one party is qualified under paragraph (a) of this section to act as a parent, must be presumed to be the parent for purposes of this section unless the biological or adoptive parent does not have legal authority to make educational decisions for the child.
( 2 ) If a judicial decree or order identifies a specific person or persons under paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) of this section to act as the “parent” of a child or to make educational decisions on behalf of a child, then such person or persons shall be determined to be the “parent” for purposes of this section.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1401(23))