alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 493 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 493

  To direct the Attorney General, in enforcing the provisions of the 
 Controlled Substances Act relating to marijuana, to focus on certain 
                        enforcement priorities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2019

 Mr. Correa (for himself, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Young, Ms. Titus, Mr. Gaetz, 
Ms. Norton, and Mr. Carbajal) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Attorney General, in enforcing the provisions of the 
 Controlled Substances Act relating to marijuana, to focus on certain 
                        enforcement priorities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sensible Enforcement of Cannabis Act 
of 2019''.

SEC. 2. MARIJUANA ENFORCEMENT PRIORITIES.

    (a) In General.--In enforcing the provisions of the Controlled 
Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) relating to the cultivation, 
manufacture, distribution, possession, or use of marijuana, the 
Attorney General of the United States shall not prosecute for any 
conduct that--
            (1) concerns marijuana for medicinal or recreational use; 
        and
            (2) is authorized by the laws of the State involved.
    (b) Exception.--Subsection (a) does not apply with respect to 
prosecution for prevention of the following:
            (1) Distribution of marijuana to minors.
            (2) Revenue from the sale of marijuana from going to 
        criminal enterprises, gangs, and cartels.
            (3) Diversion of marijuana from States where it is legal 
        under State law in some form to other States.
            (4) State-authorized marijuana activity from being used as 
        a cover or pretext for the trafficking of other illegal drugs 
        or other illegal activity.
            (5) Violence and the use of firearms in the cultivation and 
        distribution of marijuana.
            (6) Drugged driving and the exacerbation of other adverse 
        public health consequences associated with marijuana use.
            (7) The growing of marijuana on public lands and the 
        attendant public safety and environmental dangers posed by 
        marijuana production on public lands.
            (8) Marijuana possession or use on Federal property.
                                 <all>
```
§ 300.717 Definitions applicable to allotments, grants, and use of funds. As used in this subpart— ( a ) *Freely associated States* means the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Republic of Palau;
( b ) *Outlying areas* means the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands;
( c ) *State* means each of the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; and
( d ) *Average per-pupil expenditure in public elementary schools and secondary schools in the United States* means— ( 1 ) Without regard to the source of funds— ( i ) The aggregate current expenditures, during the second fiscal year preceding the fiscal year for which the determination is made (or, if satisfactory data for that year are not available, during the most recent preceding fiscal year for which satisfactory data are available) of all LEAs in the 50 States and the District of Columbia; plus
( ii ) Any direct expenditures by the State for the operation of those agencies; divided by (2) The aggregate number of children in average daily attendance to whom those agencies provided free public education during that preceding year.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1401(22), 1411(b)(1) (C) and (g))
```

[114th Congress Public Law 220]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 846]]

Public Law 114-220
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
    To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based 
   outpatient clinic in Laughlin, Nevada, as the ``Master Chief Petty 
Officer Jesse Dean VA Clinic''. <<NOTE: Sept. 23, 2016 -  [H.R. 3969]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. MASTER CHIEF PETTY OFFICER JESSE DEAN VA CLINIC.

    (a) Designation.--The Department of Veterans Affairs community-based 
outpatient clinic in Laughlin, Nevada, shall after the date of the 
enactment of this Act be known and designated as the ``Master Chief 
Petty Officer Jesse Dean VA Clinic''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the community-based 
outpatient clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the ``Master Chief Petty Officer Jesse Dean VA Clinic''.

    Approved September 23, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3969:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            May 23, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 8, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

February 25, 2021

In the Matter of

Bebida Beverage Co.

Blue Sphere Corporation

Ehouse Global, Inc. 

Eventure Interactive, Inc.

Eyes on the Go, Inc.

Green Energy Enterprises, Inc. 

Helix Wind Corp.

International Power Group Ltd.

Marani Brands, Inc.

MediaTechnics Corp. 

Net Talk.com, Inc.

Patten Energy Solutions Group, Inc. 

PTA Holdings, Inc.

Universal Apparel & Textile Company 

Wisdom Homes of America, Inc.

File No. 500-1

ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF

TRADING

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there are questions regarding: 

the adequacy and accuracy of information concerning the securities of each of the issuers 

detailed below because questions have arisen as to their operating status, if any; the recent, 

increased activity and volatility in trading in the securities of each of these issuers, in the absence 

of any publicly available news or recent information by these issuers; and certain social media 

accounts may be engaged in a coordinated attempt to artificially influence their share prices. 

The stock of each of the issuers below is quoted and traded on OTC Link whose parent company 

is OTC Markets Group, Inc. None of the issuers below has posted any information with OTC 
2

Markets Group, Inc. or filed any information with the Securities and Exchange Commission for 

over a year.

Bebida Beverage Co. (OTC: BBDA) (CIK No. 0001143451)

Blue Sphere Corporation (OTC: BLSP) (CIK No. 0001419582)

Ehouse Global, Inc. (OTC: EHOS) (CIK No. 0001452580)

Eventure Interactive, Inc. (OTC: EVTI) (CIK No. 0001509351)

Eyes on the Go, Inc. (OTC: AXCG) (CIK No. 0001498522)

Green Energy Enterprises, Inc. (OTC: GYOG) (CIK No. 0001464685) 

Helix Wind Corp. (OTC: HLXW) (CIK No. 0001364560)

International Power Group Ltd. (OTC: IPWG) (CIK No. 0001332702)

Marani Brands, Inc. (OTC: MRIB) (CIK No. 0001312623)

MediaTechnics Corp. (OTC: MEDT) (CIK No. 0001032405)

Net Talk.com, Inc. (OTC: NTLK) (CIK No. 0001383825)

Patten Energy Solutions Group, Inc. (OTC: PTTN) (CIK No. 0001448763)

PTA Holdings, Inc. (OTC: PTAH) (CIK No. 0001394327)

Universal Apparel & Textile Company (OTC: DKGR) (CIK No. 0001560462)

Wisdom Homes of America, Inc. (OTC: WOFA) (CIK No. 0001281198)

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors 

require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed Companies.
3

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange 

Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed Companies is suspended for the 

period from 9:30 a.m. EST on February 26, 2021, through 11:59 p.m. EST on March 11, 2021.

By the Commission.

Vanessa A. Countryman

 Secretary
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 81314 / August 3, 2017

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) announced the temporary 

suspension, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange 

Act"), of trading in the securities of Strategic Global Investments, Inc. (“STBV”), a Delaware 

Corporation, at 9:30 a.m. EDT on August 4, 2017, and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on

August 17, 2017. 

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of STBV because of questions 

regarding the accuracy of assertions by STBV in press releases to investors concerning, among 

other things, the activities of the company with respect to Initial Coin Offerings or ICOs. This 

order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange 

Act).

The Commission cautions broker-dealers, shareholders, and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by the company. 

Further, brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Rule 15c2-11 under the 

Exchange Act, at the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered unless 

and until they have strictly complied with all of the provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer 

has any questions as to whether or not he has complied with the rule, he should not enter any 

quotation but immediately contact the staff in the Division of Trading and Markets, Office of 

Interpretation and Guidance, at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is 

required by Rule 15c2-11, he should refrain from entering quotations relating to STBV’s

securities until such time as he has familiarized himself with the rule and is certain that all of its 

provisions have been met. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of 

the rule, the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action.

If any broker-dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, contact

Valerie A. Szczepanik, Assistant Regional Director, New York Regional Office of the Securities 

and Exchange Commission at (212) 336-0175. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the 

Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
### §1706. Injury to mail bags

Whoever tears, cuts, or otherwise injures any mail bag, pouch, or other thing used or designed for use in the conveyance of the mail, or draws or breaks any staple or loosens any part of any lock, chain, or strap attached thereto, with intent to rob or steal any such mail, or to render the same insecure, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 779; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §312 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §189, 35 Stat. 1124).

A fine of "$1,000" was substituted for "$500" thus increasing the maximum to correspond with other comparable sections. (See section 1705 of this title.)

Minor verbal changes were made.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000".
§ 303.231 Notice and hearing before determining that a State is not eligible. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) The Secretary does not make a final determination that a State is not eligible to receive a grant under part C of the Act until providing the State— ( i ) Reasonable notice; and
( ii ) An opportunity for a hearing.
( 2 ) In implementing paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, the Secretary sends a written notice to the lead agency by certified mail with a return receipt requested.
( b ) *Content of notice.* In the written notice described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the Secretary— ( 1 ) States the basis on which the Secretary proposes to make a final determination that the State is not eligible;
( 2 ) May describe possible options for resolving the issues;
( 3 ) Advises the lead agency that it may request a hearing and that the request for a hearing must be made not later than 30 days after it receives the notice of the proposed final determination that the State is not eligible; and
( 4 ) Provides the lead agency with information about the hearing procedures that will be followed.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1437(c))
Si

~‘ • ~ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

____ REGIO IX 75 Hawthorne Street

~PRO~ San Francisco, CA 94105

October 10, 2014

Ron Maldonado

Navajo Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Officer

P.O. Box 4950

Window Rock, Arizona 86515

Subject: NHPA 106 Consultation — Consulting Party Review — Four Corners Power Plant SCR

Project

Dear Mr. Maldonado,

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 (EPA) hereby requests consulting party review

under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, in accordance 36 CFR 800.5(c), for the

Four Corners Power Plant (FCPP) Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) Project on Navajo Nation. EPA

is the lead federal agency for the issuance of a Clean Air Act permit for the FCPP SCR Project. In a

letter dated July 23, 2014, the EPA formally requested initiation and consultation with you on the SCR

Project under Section 106. In an email dated August 8, 2014, you confirmed your interest in consulting

on this undertaking.

In addition, the EPA invited other potential interested parties to join the consultation process and made

EPA’s Cultural Resources Report, used to review the effects of the SCR Project on historical properties,

available for review, including during a public comment period. No other parties requested to join the

consultation process.

Please find the attached Cultural Resources Report for your review to support EPA’s finding that this

undertaking will have no adverse effect. Pursuant to 40 CFR 800.11(e), the report includes:

1. A description of the undertaking, specifying the Federal involvement, and its area of potential

effects, including photographs, maps, and drawings, as necessary;

2. A description of the steps taken to identify historic properties;

3. A description of the affected historic properties, including information on the characteristics that

quality them for the National Register;

4. A description of the undertaking’s effects on historic properties;

5. An explanation of why the criteria of adverse effect were found applicable or inapplicable,

including any conditions or future actions to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects; and

6. Copies or summaries of any views provided by consulting parties and the public.

Pursuant to 36 CFR 800.5(c), the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO) shall have 30 days from

receipt to review the EPA’s findings. The EPA may proceed with making a final permit decision if after

the close of the 30-day review period the THPO has agreed with the finding or has not provided a

response.
Please mail or email your response to:

Mail: Gerardo C. Rios, Chief

Air Permits Office (Air-3)

U.S. EPA Region 9

75 Hawthorne St

San Francisco, CA 94105

Email: R9AirPermits@epa.gov

If you have any questions regarding this project please contact Lisa Beckham ofmy staff at (415) 972-

3811 or beckham.lisa(~epa.gov.

Attachment

Cc: Eugenia Quintana, Navajo Nation EPA

Richard Grimes, APS

Sincerely,

C. Rios

Chief, Air Permits Office
**Exhibit 23** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the    Registration Statements on    Form S-8    (Nos.    333-135612,33-42015,33-55777,33-62623,333-13849,333-87419,333-49728    and    333-100820)    of H. J. Heinz Company of our report dated June 21, 2007    relating to the financial statements, financial statement    schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of    internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness    of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in    this    Form 10-K.      /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers    LLP         Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania    June 21, 2007
§ 222.179 Under what circumstances may an ineligible LEA apply on behalf of a school for an emergency grant under the second priority? An LEA that is eligible to receive section 8003(b) assistance for the fiscal year but that does not meet the other eligibility criteria described in § 222.178(a) or (b) may apply on behalf of a school located within its geographic boundaries for an emergency grant under the second priority of section 8007(b) of the Act if— ( a ) The school— ( 1 ) Enrolls children living on Indian lands equal to at least 40 percent of the total number of children in ADA; or
( 2 ) Enrolls children with a parent in the U.S. uniformed services equal to at least 40 percent of the total number of children in ADA;
( b ) The school has a school facility emergency that the Secretary has determined poses a health or safety hazard to students and school personnel;
( c ) The LEA has used at least 75 percent of its bond limit; and
( d ) The LEA has an average per-student assessed value of real property available to be taxed for school purposes that is below its State average.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7707(b))
§ 21.44 Further proceedings. ( a ) The adjudicative officer shall make the determination of an award on the basis of the written record.
( b ) ( 1 ) However, the adjudicative officer may order further proceedings on his or her own initiative or at the request of the applicant or the Department's counsel.
( 2 ) The adjudicative officer may order further proceedings only if he or she determines that those proceedings are necessary for full and fair resolution of issues arising from the application.
( 3 ) If further proceedings are ordered, the adjudicative officer shall determine the scope of those proceedings, which may include such proceedings as informal conferences, oral arguments, additional written submissions, discovery, or an evidentiary hearing.
( 4 ) An adjudicative officer may not order discovery or an evidentiary hearing for the issue of whether or not the Department's position was substantially justified.
( c ) If the applicant or the Department's counsel requests the adjudicative officer to order further proceedings, the request must— ( 1 ) Specify the information sought or the disputed issues; and
( 2 ) Explain why the additional proceedings are necessary to obtain that information or resolve those issues.
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 504(a)(3) and (c)(1))
Exhibit
        32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Q Comm International, Inc.
        (the " Company ")
        on
        Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission (" SEC ")
        on the
        date hereof (the " Report "),
        I,
        Mark W. Robinson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to
        18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will
        be
        retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
        request.
 
 
 /s/
        Mark W.
        Robinson
 Mark
        W.
        Robinson
 Chief
        Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
 (Principal
        Accounting Officer)
 
 November
        13, 2006
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 96-40370

Summary Calendar

____________________

CARLOS CANALES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JAMES A. COLLINS, Director,

Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Institutional Division, Et Al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:95-CV-961 

________________________________________________________________

August 21, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Carlos Canales, #611845, appeals the dismissal of his civil

rights complaint as frivolous. He argues numerous violations of

his rights to due process and to be free from cruel and unusual

punishment. We find no reversible error in the district court’s
-2-

analysis. Canales v. Cockrell, No. 6:95cv961 (March 5, 1996).

Canales’ motion for injunctive relief is DENIED.

A F F I R M E D.
### §§794, 795. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 794, which required the work of the commission to be performed by and through the Departments of War, Interior, and Agriculture and their personnel, consisted of the second paragraph of section 2 of act June 10, 1920, ch. 285, 41 Stat. 1063, which was omitted in the revision of said section 2 by act June 23, 1930, ch. 572, §1, 46 Stat. 798. The first and third paragraphs of said section 2 were formerly classified to sections 793 and 795 of this title.

Section 795, which related to expenses of the commission generally, consisted of the third paragraph of section 2 of act June 10, 1920, ch. 285, 41 Stat. 1063. Such section 2 was amended generally by act June 23, 1930, ch. 572, §1, 46 Stat. 798, and is classified to section 793 of this title. The first and second paragraphs of said section 2 were formerly classified to sections 793 and 794 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 6,532

 7,209

 7,370

 7,487

 7,634

 7,385

 6,310

 6,257

 6,307

 5,440

 5,023

 4,006

 4,493

 7,791

 9,236

 9,095

 9,654

 10,783

 12,423

 13,140

 12,301

 11,079

 10,451

 9,899

 8,602

 7,843

 8,561

 9,514

 10,489

 10,259

 10,421

 1,356

 1,322

 940

 1,043

 964

 716

 585

 535

 441

 479

 425

 395

 396

 657

 1,148

 1,118

 727

 735

 991

 1,766

 1,699

 1,440

 1,950

 2,705

 2,530

 2,794

 2,619

 3,135

 3,294

 3,007

 2,224

 3,690

 3,906

 3,995

 4,353

 4,338

 3,820

 3,422

 3,156

 3,022

 2,921

 2,733

 2,433

 2,177

 2,798

 3,752

 4,331

 4,747

 5,377

 6,082

 6,918

 6,440

 5,902

 6,073

 6,175

 5,795

 5,331

 5,248

 5,715

 6,154

 6,247

 6,208

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 4, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER