alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7195]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel, Translational Stroke SEP.
    Date: April 4, 2011.
    Time: 12:30 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Shanta Rajaram, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, NINDS/
NIH/DHHS/Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Suite 3208, 
MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-435-6033, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3042515a5142515d43705d51595c1e5e59581e575f46"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e496858e8596858997a489858d88ca8a8d8cca838b92">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 21, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-7195 Filed 3-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §1652. Citizens as pirates

Whoever, being a citizen of the United States, commits any murder or robbery, or any act of hostility against the United States, or against any citizen thereof, on the high seas, under color of any commission from any foreign prince, or state, or on pretense of authority from any person, is a pirate, and shall be imprisoned for life.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 774.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §495 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §304, 35 Stat. 1147).

Words "Notwithstanding the pretense of such authority," were omitted as surplusage.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5019 

To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide support to university 

law school programs that are designed to provide legal assistance to 

veterans, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 8, 2019 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide 

support to university law school programs that are designed to provide legal assistance to veterans, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Legal Sup5 port Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5019 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS SUPPORT 

2 FOR UNIVERSITY LEGAL CLINICS THAT AS3 SIST VETERANS. 

4 (a) SUPPORT AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of Vet5 erans Affairs may provide support to one or more univer6 sity law school programs that are designed to provide legal 

7 assistance to veterans. 

8 (b) ELIGIBLE PROGRAMS.—Programs of university 

9 law schools which may receive support under subsection 

10 (a) may include programs that assist veterans with— 

11 (1) filing and appealing claims for benefits 

12 under laws administered by the Secretary; and 

13 (2) such other civil, criminal, and family legal 

14 matters as the Secretary considers appropriate. 

15 (c) FINANCIAL SUPPORT.— 

16 (1) IN GENERAL.—The support provided a pro17 gram under subsection (a) may include financial 

18 support of the program. 

19 (2) LIMITATION ON AMOUNT.—The total 

20 amount of financial support provided under sub21 section (a) in any fiscal year may not exceed 

22 $1,000,000. 

23 (3) FUNDING.—Amounts for financial support 

24 under subsection (a) shall be derived from amounts 

25 appropriated or otherwise made available to the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5019 IH

1 Medical Services account of the Department of Vet2 erans Affairs. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

# AGENCY:

Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

# ACTION:

Notice of Solicitation for Grant Applications (SGA).

*Funding Opportunity Number:*                     SGA/DFA PY-10-12                

# SUMMARY:

The Employment and Training Administration (ETA), U.S. Department of Labor announces the availability of approximately $5.5 million authorized by the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 to support applicants in providing intensive mentoring services to low-income young parents (both mothers and fathers, and expectant parents ages 16 to 24) participating in workforce development programs. Activities under this SGA are authorized under Section 171(b) of the Workforce Investment Act, which allows for demonstration and pilot projects for the purpose of developing and implementing techniques and approaches, and demonstrating the effectiveness of specialized methods, in addressing employment and training needs.

                        The complete SGA and any subsequent SGA amendments, in connection with the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 is described in further detail on ETA's Web site at                         *http://www.doleta.gov/​grants*                         or on                         *http://www.grants.gov.*                         The Web sites provide application information, eligibility requirements, review and selection procedures and other program requirements governing this solicitation.                    

# DATES:

The closing date for receipt of applications is April 29, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Latifa Jeter, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N4716, Washington, DC 20210;                         *Telephone:*                         202-693-3553.                    

Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of March, 2011.

Eric D. Luetkenhaus,

Grant Officer, Employment and Training Administration.

[FR Doc. 2011-7556 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### § 222.188 What priorities may the Secretary establish?

In any given year, the Secretary may assign extra weight for certain facilities systems or emergency and modernization conditions by identifying the systems or conditions and their assigned weights in a notice published in the Federal Register.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7707(b))
§ 361.760 How do one-stop partners jointly fund other shared costs under the Memorandum of Understanding? ( a ) In addition to jointly funding infrastructure costs, one-stop partners listed in §§ 361.400 through 361.410 must use a portion of funds made available under their programs' authorizing Federal law (or fairly evaluated in-kind contributions) to pay the additional costs relating to the operation of the one-stop delivery system. These other costs must include applicable career services and may include other costs, including shared services.
( b ) For the purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, shared services' costs may include the costs of shared services that are authorized for and may be commonly provided through the one-stop partner programs to any individual, such as initial intake, assessment of needs, appraisal of basic skills, identification of appropriate services to meet such needs, referrals to other one-stop partners, and business services. Shared operating costs may also include shared costs of the Local WDB's functions.
( c ) Contributions to the additional costs related to operation of the one-stop delivery system may be cash, non-cash, or third-party in-kind contributions, consistent with how these are described in § 361.720(c).
( d ) The shared costs described in paragraph (a) of this section must be allocated according to the proportion of benefit received by each of the partners, consistent with the Federal law authorizing the partner's program, and consistent with all other applicable legal requirements, including Federal cost principles in 2 CFR part 200 (or any corresponding similar regulation or ruling) requiring that costs are allowable, reasonable, necessary, and allocable.
( e ) Any shared costs agreed upon by the one-stop partners must be included in the MOU.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 10,180

 10,779

 8,782

 10,630

 11,698

 12,089

 12,024

 11,802

 11,832

 12,359

 13,285

 13,389

 13,705

 14,173

 14,119

 14,010

 12,264

 11,106

 10,211

 9,196

 9,192

 10,648

 11,945

 13,046

 13,557

 13,957

 15,747

 11,201

 10,986

 11,070

 1,923

 1,310

 2,070

 1,492

 1,930

 2,442

 3,760

 4,237

 4,447

 4,829

 4,836

 5,079

 4,603

 3,947

 3,384

 3,575

 3,538

 3,401

 3,311

 3,206

 3,418

 4,152

 4,178

 4,065

 4,282

 4,428

 4,027

 4,407

 2,531

 2,091

 5,610

 5,616

 4,662

 5,668

 6,751

 7,239

 7,732

 8,048

 7,811

 7,908

 8,240

 8,355

 8,355

 7,843

 7,936

 8,044

 7,225

 6,709

 6,390

 6,325

 6,086

 6,748

 7,208

 7,304

 7,786

 7,912

 9,443

 7,577

 6,216

 6,381

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 15, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23
 
                    HELLER FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
To Heller Financial, Inc.
 
  As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our report dated January 18, 1999 (except with respect to the matters
discussed in Note 25, as to which the date is February 15, 1999) included in
this Form 10-K at page 56, into the Company's previously filed Registration
Statement on Form S-3 No.
333-58723.
 
/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
 
Chicago, Illinois
March 3, 1999
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7081

DEMBRY V. WHITE, a/k/a Dembry V. Shabazz,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District

Judge. (CA-98-42-2)

Submitted: March 25, 1999 Decided: March 30, 1999

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dembry V. White, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Dembry White appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

White’s case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended

that relief be denied and advised White that the failure to file

timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate

review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

Despite this warning, White failed to object to the magistrate

judge’s recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s

recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the

substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); United States v.

Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 93-94 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S.

1208 (1984); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). White

has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after

receiving proper notice. We accordingly deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §702. Copyright Office regulations

The Register of Copyrights is authorized to establish regulations not inconsistent with law for the administration of the functions and duties made the responsibility of the Register under this title. All regulations established by the Register under this title are subject to the approval of the Librarian of Congress.

(Pub. L. 94–553, title I, §101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2591.)
### §695p. Regulation of waters to maintain sump levels

In carrying out the obligations of the United States under any migratory bird treaty, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (40 Stat. 755), as amended [16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.], or the Migratory Bird Conservation Act (45 Stat. 1222), as amended [16 U.S.C. 715 et seq.], waters under the control of the Secretary of the Interior shall be regulated, subject to valid existing rights, to maintain sump levels in the Tule Lake National Wildlife Refuge at levels established by regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to the contract between the United States and the Tulelake Irrigation District, dated September 10, 1956, or any amendment thereof. Such regulations shall accommodate to the maximum extent practicable waterfowl management needs.

(Pub. L. 88–567, §6, Sept. 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 851.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (40 Stat. 755), referred to in text, is act July 3, 1918, ch. 128, 40 Stat. 755, which is classified generally to subchapter II of chapter 7 (§703 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 710 of this title and Tables.

The Migratory Bird Conservation Act (45 Stat. 1222), as amended, referred to in text, is act Feb. 18, 1929, ch. 257, 45 Stat. 1222, which is classified generally to subchapter III (§715 et seq.) of chapter 7 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 715 of this title and Tables.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 10,364 4,146 7,160

2 9,839 3,773 6,820

3 10,791 4,491 7,375

4 11,867 5,231 7,821

5 12,504 5,826 8,321

6 13,292 5,498 8,412

7 13,111 5,233 8,662

8 14,183 1,000 8,747

9 14,362 4,959 9,137

10 14,676 4,969 9,007

11 14,975 4,771 9,033

12 14,559 5,189 9,040

13 13,868 5,025 8,608

14 0 0 0

15 0 0 0

16 0 0 0

17 0 0 0

18 0 0 0

19 0 0 0

20 0 0 0

21 0 0 0

22 12,143 1,000 5,827

23 14,127 6,014 9,901

24 15,548 6,230 10,552

25 15,262 6,854 10,730

26 14,420 6,752 10,257

27 14,556 6,683 10,465

28 14,089 7,269 10,463

29 13,379 7,214 9,863

30 12,349 7,043 9,832

31 12,294 6,802 9,424

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Collinsville Bottom On The Sacramento 

River 

Period: August 2022 Run Date: 11/22/2022
### §802. Information to accompany application for license; landowner notification

(a) Each applicant for a license under this chapter shall submit to the commission—

(1) Such maps, plans, specifications, and estimates of cost as may be required for a full understanding of the proposed project. Such maps, plans, and specifications when approved by the commission shall be made a part of the license; and thereafter no change shall be made in said maps, plans, or specifications until such changes shall have been approved and made a part of such license by the commission.

(2) Satisfactory evidence that the applicant has complied with the requirements of the laws of the State or States within which the proposed project is to be located with respect to bed and banks and to the appropriation, diversion, and use of water for power purposes and with respect to the right to engage in the business of developing, transmitting and distributing power, and in any other business necessary to effect the purposes of a license under this chapter.

(3) 1 Such additional information as the commission may require.

(b) Upon the filing of any application for a license (other than a license under section 808 of this title) the applicant shall make a good faith effort to notify each of the following by certified mail:

(1) Any person who is an owner of record of any interest in the property within the bounds of the project.

(2) Any Federal, State, municipal or other local governmental agency likely to be interested in or affected by such application.

(June 10, 1920, ch. 285, pt. I, §9, 41 Stat. 1068; renumbered pt. I, Aug. 26, 1935, ch. 687, title II, §212, 49 Stat. 847; Pub. L. 99–495, §14, Oct. 16, 1986, 100 Stat. 1257.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Former subsec. (c), included in the provisions designated as subsec. (a) by Pub. L. 99–495, has been editorially redesignated as par. (3) of subsec. (a) as the probable intent of Congress.

#### Amendments

1986—Pub. L. 99–495 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), redesignated former subsecs. (a) and (b) as pars. (1) and (2) of subsec. (a), and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–495 effective with respect to each license, permit, or exemption issued under this chapter after Oct. 16, 1986, see section 18 of Pub. L. 99–495, set out as a note under section 797 of this title.

1 See Codification note below.
§ 361.35 Innovation and expansion activities. ( a ) The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must assure that the State will reserve and use a portion of the funds allotted to the State under section 110 of the Act— ( 1 ) For the development and implementation of innovative approaches to expand and improve the provision of vocational rehabilitation services to individuals with disabilities, particularly individuals with the most significant disabilities, including transition services for students and youth with disabilities and pre-employment transition services for students with disabilities, consistent with the findings of the comprehensive statewide assessment of the rehabilitation needs of individuals with disabilities under § 361.29(a) and the State's goals and priorities under § 361.29(c);
( 2 ) To support the funding of the State Rehabilitation Council, if the State has a Council, consistent with the resource plan identified in § 361.17(i); and
( 3 ) To support the funding of the Statewide Independent Living Council, consistent with the Statewide Independent Living Council resource plan prepared under Section 705(e)(1) of the Act.
( b ) The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must— ( 1 ) Describe how the reserved funds will be used; and
( 2 ) Include a report describing how the reserved funds were used.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1205-0522) (Authority: Sections 12(c) and 101(a)(18) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 721(a) (18))
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

[lyou make changes to tlw values in the table bdoll'. you IIIIlS/ ensure the totals update accordingly. [l 

they do nul, click (or Tuh) into and then out of the cha11ged cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) 

Do (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Access 1.3 \ l i' ,!1 10.511 196 ' .(•5X 1J 

Apply Sealant, Left 0.1 Side 1\ ' " ~ .. 0 196 ·•. .l'll:' llll 

Apply Sealant, 0.1 " x .:;u \ ~ ~n 196 '-:I {J(•o.uO Right Side 

Close 1.3 " l i(l.:'ll ":- J 10.511 196 s~ 1 .~,~)\.lj{} 

') 0 {}l) \ 0 \)fl ~' (; .(J(l 

\ 0 (10 \ () 01 J s lUll} 

-; 0 !lll >; n.nn \ o.no 

' ().\Ill \) !li I '· () 1)11 

\ O.tH• ') iJ _\}II ' 11''1• 

0 "'' l! nn ' il 01) 

0 Ot• '· 0 OJ! • O.IJti 

o.o., " (J (jtl " II }I! 

(l !)II ' f' {lfl ., 0 \11' 

) (). ()ll o no ... fl.IH• ... O.CH• ' !1,01) " 11 no .., 0 ()(J \ t) IJO ., (1,0\) 

') (I 00 \ 0 f)(J ' 0.()0 

\ OJ tO \ tltJI .• ql)() 

" I) (i() 0.(10 f' .Oll 

tl (j 1) ldJ p (11) 

The known number of products in com_Qiiance: 

Total Costs of com_Qiiance for U.S. fleet: $46,648 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: ~ 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

testing, and close- replacement) up) 

\ (l ()i) 'S Cl.fH) 

·; II 00 " I tl(l 

• (I ()(I .., dfll) 

!', 0.00 c;, (),11(1 
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? ~ 

YES* D NO IZI 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? ~ 

YES* D NO IZI 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer .• 

YES D NO IZI 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? · 

YES* D NO IZI 

*Explanation: