alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §6301. Findings and purposes

#### (a) Findings

Congress finds that—

(1) great ape populations have declined to the point that the long-term survival of the species in the wild is in serious jeopardy;

(2) the chimpanzee, gorilla, bonobo, orangutan, and gibbon are listed as endangered species under section 1533 of this title and under Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (27 UST 1087; TIAS 8249);

(3) because the challenges facing the conservation of great apes are so immense, the resources available to date have not been sufficient to cope with the continued loss of habitat due to human encroachment and logging and the consequent diminution of great ape populations;

(4) because great apes are flagship species for the conservation of the tropical forest habitats in which they are found, conservation of great apes provides benefits to numerous other species of wildlife, including many other endangered species;

(5) among the threats to great apes, in addition to habitat loss, are population fragmentation, hunting for the bushmeat trade, live capture, and exposure to emerging or introduced diseases;

(6) great apes are important components of the ecosystems they inhabit, and studies of their wild populations have provided important biological insights;

(7) although subsistence hunting of tropical forest animals has occurred for hundreds of years at a sustainable level, the tremendous increase in the commercial trade of tropical forest species is detrimental to the future of these species; and

(8) the reduction, removal, or other effective addressing of the threats to the long-term viability of populations of great apes in the wild will require the joint commitment and effort of countries that have within their boundaries any part of the range of great apes, the United States and other countries, and the private sector.

#### (b) Purposes

The purposes of this chapter are—

(1) to sustain viable populations of great apes in the wild; and

(2) to assist in the conservation and protection of great apes by supporting conservation programs of countries in which populations of great apes are located and by supporting the CITES Secretariat.

(Pub. L. 106–411, §2, Nov. 1, 2000, 114 Stat. 1789.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 106–411, §1, Nov. 1, 2000, 114 Stat. 1789, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Great Ape Conservation Act of 2000'."
§ 300.43 Transition services. ( a ) *Transition services* means a coordinated set of activities for a child with a disability that— ( 1 ) Is designed to be within a results-oriented process, that is focused on improving the academic and functional achievement of the child with a disability to facilitate the child's movement from school to post-school activities, including postsecondary education, vocational education, integrated employment (including supported employment), continuing and adult education, adult services, independent living, or community participation;
( 2 ) Is based on the individual child's needs, taking into account the child's strengths, preferences, and interests; and includes— ( i ) Instruction;
( ii ) Related services;
( iii ) Community experiences;
( iv ) The development of employment and other post-school adult living objectives; and
( v ) If appropriate, acquisition of daily living skills and provision of a functional vocational evaluation.
( b ) *Transition services* for children with disabilities may be special education, if provided as specially designed instruction, or a related service, if required to assist a child with a disability to benefit from special education.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1401(34))
# CA2022210EN.01000101.xml

| 25.5.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 210/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 210/1

---

Corrigendum to Circular Bio-based Europe Joint Undertaking (CBE JU) – Publication of a vacancy for the function of Executive Director (Temporary Agent – Grade AD 14) – COM/2022/20077

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 206 A of 23 May 2022
  )

(2022/C 210 A/01)

On page 5, ‘Closing date’, first paragraph:

| for: | ‘The closing date for registration is 13 June 2022, 12.00 noon Brussels time, following which registration is no longer possible.’, |
| --- | --- |

for:

‘The closing date for registration is 13 June 2022, 12.00 noon Brussels time, following which registration is no longer possible.’,

| read: | ‘The closing date for registration is 4 July 2022, 12.00 noon Brussels time, following which registration is no longer possible.’. |
| --- | --- |

read:

read:

‘The closing date for registration is 4 July 2022, 12.00 noon Brussels time, following which registration is no longer possible.’.

---
§ 106.52 Employment criteria. A recipient shall not administer or operate any test or other criterion for any employment opportunity which has a disproportionately adverse effect on persons on the basis of sex unless: ( a ) Use of such test or other criterion is shown to predict validly successful performance in the position in question; and
( b ) Alternative tests or criteria for such purpose, which do not have such disproportionately adverse effect, are shown to be unavailable.
[45 FR 30955, May 9, 1980, as amended at 85 FR 30579, May 19, 2020]
§ 361.500 What is the Memorandum of Understanding for the one-stop delivery system and what must be included in the Memorandum of Understanding? ( a ) The MOU is the product of local discussion and negotiation, and is an agreement developed and executed between the Local WDB and the one-stop partners, with the agreement of the chief elected official and the one-stop partners, relating to the operation of the one-stop delivery system in the local area. Two or more local areas in a region may develop a single joint MOU, if they are in a region that has submitted a regional plan under sec. 106 of WIOA.
( b ) The MOU must include: ( 1 ) A description of services to be provided through the one-stop delivery system, including the manner in which the services will be coordinated and delivered through the system;
( 2 ) Agreement on funding the costs of the services and the operating costs of the system, including: ( i ) Funding of infrastructure costs of one-stop centers in accordance with §§ 361.700 through 361.755; and
( ii ) Funding of the shared services and operating costs of the one-stop delivery system described in § 361.760;
( 3 ) Methods for referring individuals between the one-stop operators and partners for appropriate services and activities;
( 4 ) Methods to ensure that the needs of workers, youth, and individuals with barriers to employment, including individuals with disabilities, are addressed in providing access to services, including access to technology and materials that are available through the one-stop delivery system;
( 5 ) The duration of the MOU and procedures for amending it; and
( 6 ) Assurances that each MOU will be reviewed, and if substantial changes have occurred, renewed, not less than once every 3-year period to ensure appropriate funding and delivery of services.
( c ) The MOU may contain any other provisions agreed to by the parties that are consistent with WIOA title I, the authorizing statutes and regulations of one-stop partner programs, and the WIOA regulations.
( d ) When fully executed, the MOU must contain the signatures of the Local WDB, one-stop partners, the chief elected official(s), and the time period in which the agreement is effective. The MOU must be updated not less than every 3 years to reflect any changes in the signatory official of the Board, one-stop partners, and chief elected officials, or one-stop infrastructure funding.
( e ) If a one-stop partner appeal to the State regarding infrastructure costs, using the process described in § 361.750, results in a change to the one-stop partner's infrastructure cost contributions, the MOU must be updated to reflect the final one-stop partner infrastructure cost contributions.
### §6814. Limitation on use of fees for employee bonuses

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, fees collected under the authorities of the chapter may not be used for employee bonuses.

(Pub. L. 108–447, div. J, title VIII, §815, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3393.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "the Act", and was translated as reading "this title", meaning title VIII of div. J of Pub. L. 108–447, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3377, known as the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act, to reflect the probable intent of Congress. For complete classification of title VIII to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 6801 of this title and Tables.
# Official Journal L 1/5 Ja

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 1 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 525 January 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 1

English edition

Legislation

Volume 525 January 2009

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2009 of 18 December 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 1255/96 temporarily suspending the autonomous common customs tariff duties on certain industrial, agricultural and fishery products | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2009 of 18 December 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 1255/96 temporarily suspending the autonomous common customs tariff duties on certain industrial, agricultural and fishery products

1

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover) | s3 |

*

Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover)

Note to the reader

s3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7279** 

DANNY D. IRICK, a/k/a Danny Dewayne Irick , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. A. MANSUKHANI, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee , and C. SAMUELS, Director; E. HOLDER, United States Attorney General , Respondent s .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Anderson

. Timothy M. Cain , District Judge. ( 8:14

- cv - 00183

- TMC )

Submitted : February 6, 2015 Decided: March 26, 2015

Before KING and SHEDD , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Danny D

. Irick, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIA M:
Danny D. Irick , a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012)

p etition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Irick v. Mansukhani , No. 8:14

- cv - 00183

- TMC (D.S.C. Aug. 18, 2014). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequatel y presented in the materials
before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 212.0 Definitions.

For purposes of § 212.1 and § 235.1 of this chapter:

*Adjacent islands* means Bermuda and the islands located in the Caribbean Sea, except Cuba.

*Cruise ship* means a passenger vessel over 100 gross tons, carrying more than 12 passengers for hire, making a voyage lasting more than 24 hours any part of which is on the high seas, and for which passengers are embarked or disembarked in the United States or its territories.

*Ferry* means any vessel operating on a pre-determined fixed schedule and route, which is being used solely to provide transportation between places that are no more than 300 miles apart and which is being used to transport passengers, vehicles, and/or railroad cars.

*Pleasure vessel* means a vessel that is used exclusively for recreational or personal purposes and not to transport passengers or property for hire.

*United States* means “United States” as defined in section 215(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1185(c)).

*U.S. citizen* means a United States citizen or a U.S. non-citizen national.

*United States qualifying tribal entity* means a tribe, band, or other group of Native Americans formally recognized by the United States Government which agrees to meet WHTI document standards.

[73 FR 18415, Apr. 3, 2008]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7279

DANNY D. IRICK, a/k/a Danny Dewayne Irick,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

A. MANSUKHANI, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee,

and

C. SAMUELS, Director; E. HOLDER, United States Attorney 

General,

Respondents.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. 

(8:14-cv-00183-TMC)

Submitted: February 6, 2015 Decided: March 26, 2015

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Danny D. Irick, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Danny D. Irick, a federal prisoner, appeals the 

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the 

magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) 

petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. See Irick v. Mansukhani, No. 8:14-cv-00183-TMC 

(D.S.C. Aug. 18, 2014). We grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Lillian Goldstein, Respondent, against Bleiberg Plumbing Supplies, Inc., et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.
Case 18-33270-KLP Doc 45 Filed 10/24/18 Entered 10/24/18 16:20:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
Case 18-33270-KLP Doc 45 Filed 10/24/18 Entered 10/24/18 16:20:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
Case 18-33270-KLP Doc 45 Filed 10/24/18 Entered 10/24/18 16:20:07 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
!

"#



			


$%&'()(*(*"(+(,*(,)#-./0/1('*()(

#-+**(',+(,23()/"#)'/,*"#0/3+*'/,

)*3)'/42((




)
('#2)(#-(2			



 !

5$2!6


78

/,*

(',%

)(3./

9:
#((',2/(8:

;2
:

<=>:::

 Oct 15 2018

/s/ Frank J. Santoro Oct 13 2018

Case 16-72512-FJS Doc 96 Filed 10/15/18 Entered 10/15/18 14:35:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
? &	.

@@5$2!26

5$2!6

/,*

(',%

)(3./

9:
#((',2/(8:

;2
:

<=>:::


	"

@@?.
&&7A

?
,#-

,,('3,
/

/%,	)

;2
2

<=89:

5$2!6


78

/,*

(',%

)(3./

9:
#((',2/(8:

;2
:

<=>:::

Case 16-72512-FJS Doc 96 Filed 10/15/18 Entered 10/15/18 14:35:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3


"#$$%&'(



.*3(3&)4))#-)@1)/,,'-(//',	/,>:<=

@@5$2!26

5$2!6

/,*

(',%

)(3./

%('(1'(

	



:8 &	%

%?2


?.
&&7A



	&$%

&$.%.	&"

%?2


5$2!6


78

/,*

(',%

)(3./

9:
#((',2/(8:

;2
:

<=>:::

Case 16-72512-FJS Doc 96 Filed 10/15/18 Entered 10/15/18 14:35:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
#### § 303.105 Positive efforts to employ and advance qualified individuals with disabilities.

Each recipient of assistance under part C of the Act must make positive efforts to employ and advance in employment, qualified individuals with disabilities in programs assisted under part C of the Act.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1405)
§ 200.82 Use of program funds for unique program function costs. An SEA may use the funds available from its State Migrant Education Program (MEP) to carry out other administrative activities, beyond those allowable under § 200.100(b)(4), that are unique to the MEP, including those that are the same or similar to administrative activities performed by LEAs in the State under subpart A of this part. These activities include but are not limited to— ( a ) Statewide identification and recruitment of eligible migratory children;
( b ) Interstate and intrastate coordination of the State MEP and its local projects with other relevant programs and local projects in the State and in other States;
( c ) Procedures for providing for educational continuity for migratory children through the timely transfer of educational and health records, beyond that required generally by State and local agencies;
( d ) Collecting and using information for accurate distribution of subgrant funds;
( e ) Development of a statewide needs assessment and a comprehensive State plan for MEP service delivery;
( f ) Supervision of instructional and support staff;
( g ) Establishment and implementation of a State parent advisory council; and
( h ) Conducting an evaluation of the effectiveness of the State MEP.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 6392, 6571)
[67 FR 71736, Dec. 2, 2002; 68 FR 19152, Apr. 18, 2003]
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

276 

KA 16-01335 

PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, APPELLANT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MICHAEL SWEAT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

MICHAEL J. FLAHERTY, JR., ACTING DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (NICHOLAS

T. TEXIDO OF COUNSEL), FOR APPELLANT. 

MICHAEL J. STACHOWSKI, P.C., BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. STACHOWSKI OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Penny M.

Wolfgang, J.), dated May 16, 2016. The order granted that part of

defendant’s omnibus motion to suppress physical evidence and

statements made to the police.

It is hereby ORDERED that the case is held, the decision is

reserved and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for

further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: The

People appeal from an order granting that part of defendant’s omnibus

motion to suppress physical evidence, i.e., a gun, and statements made

to the police. At the suppression hearing, a police officer testified

that he was traveling in a marked patrol vehicle when he saw defendant

standing on the porch of a home. After defendant looked in the

direction of the approaching patrol vehicle, he turned and entered the

home. The officer pulled his vehicle to the side of the road and

proceeded on foot to the porch, where he encountered defendant as he

reemerged from the home. The officer asked, “What are you doing

here?” When defendant did not respond, the officer conducted a search

of the home and found a gun in a front closet near the entrance to the

porch. Thereafter, defendant was arrested and gave statements. 

Supreme Court suppressed the weapon and statements on the ground that,

because the initial encounter between defendant and the police was an

unlawful level one encounter under People v De Bour (40 NY2d 210,

223), the ensuing search of the home was unwarranted.

We agree with the People that the court erred in suppressing the

gun and statements without making any determination on defendant’s

standing to challenge the allegedly unlawful search of the home. 

Because “our review is limited to the issues determined by the court”

(People v Schrock, 99 AD3d 1196, 1197), and the court failed to rule

on the threshold issue of standing, we hold the case, reserve

decision, and remit the matter to Supreme Court to rule on that issue. 
-2- 276 

KA 16-01335 

If the court determines that defendant has standing, the court should

then determine whether one of the homeowners consented to the search.

Entered: March 24, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
:\blm\butt \ams\FinalFi \Fig2-18_Sheep8511.mxd 

Butte 

Helena 

Bozeman 

Boulder 

Big Sky 

Townsend 

Gardiner 

Belgrade 

Anaconda 

Whitehall 

Livingston 

Three Forks 

East Helena 

West Yellowstone 

Deerlodge

County 

Silverbow

County 

Lewis and Clark 

County 

Broadwater 

County 

Gallatin

Coun ty 

Park

County 

Meagher

County Powell

County

Granite

Coun ty 

Beaverhead

County 

Madison

County 

Wheatland

County 

Sweet Grass

County 

Stillwater 

Coun ty 

Yellowstone National

Park 

Freemont

County 

Clark

County 

Jefferson

County 

§ ̈¦15 

§ ̈¦15 

§ ̈¦90 

§ ̈¦90 

£¤12 

£¤12 

WYOMING

IDAHO 

MONTANA 

IDAHO 

Cascade

County 

g ermp gures

I Bighorn Sheep Winter Ranges 

Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Lands Bighorn Sheep Winter Ranges 

0 Miles 25 Butte Field Office - EIS 

No warranty is made by the Bureau of RMP Planning Area, Montana Land Management (BLM) for use of

data for purposes not intended by BLM. FIGURE 2-18
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
 

Bureau of Land Management
 

Lewistown
 

Field Office
 

Billings 

Field Office 

T 5 N 

36 31 36 31 36 31 36 31
 36

31
 36

1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1
 

6
 1
 

20414
 

T 4 N 

89
 

36 31 36 31 36 31 36 31 36 31 36
 

6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 1
 6 1

T 3 N 

86
 

R 6 E R 7 E R 8 E R 9 E R 10 E R 11 E 

Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Private 1 inch equals 1.58 miles Allotment Boundary 

Field Office Boundary Bureau of Reclamation State Miles 

Interstate 0 10 20
 

Local Government US Fish and Wildlife Service US Route
 

MT Route
 

National Park Service (NPS) US Forest Service (USFS)
 MT Secondary 

Road 

Other Federal Land Water 

Butte Field Office
 

Draft RMP/EIS
 

Grazing Allotment Map 5
 

Ringling, Montana Quad
 

Butte Field Office 

Miles
 

0 50 100
 

Map shows existing grazing allotments found 

within the boundaries of the Ringling, Montana 

1:100,000 USGS topographic map series 

Map generated by the Butte Field Office in February 2007 

Universal Transverse Mercator NAD 27 Projection 

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of 

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data 

for individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by 

BLM. This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product 

was developed through digital means and information may be updated without 

notification.
#### § 300.201 Consistency with State policies.

The LEA, in providing for the education of children with disabilities within its jurisdiction, must have in effect policies, procedures, and programs that are consistent with the State policies and procedures established under §§ 300.101 through 300.163, and §§ 300.165 through 300.174.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0600)

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1413(a)(1))