alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §756. Investigations, surveys, and experiments; construction and installation of conservation devices, etc.

The Secretary of Commerce is further authorized and directed (1) to conduct such investigations, and such engineering and biological surveys and experiments, as may be necessary to direct and facilitate conservation of the fishery resources of the Columbia River and its tributaries; (2) to construct and install devices in the Columbia River Basin for the improvement of feeding and spawning conditions for fish, for the protection of migratory fish from irrigation projects, and for facilitating free migration of fish over obstructions; and (3) to perform all other activities necessary for the conservation of fish in the Columbia River Basin in accordance with law.

(May 11, 1938, ch. 193, §2, 52 Stat. 345; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. II, §4(e), eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2731, 53 Stat. 1433; Aug. 8, 1946, ch. 883, §1, 60 Stat. 932; 1970 Reorg. Plan No. 4, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1946—Act Aug. 8, 1946, struck out requirement to maintain conservation devices, etc.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Transfer of functions to Secretary of Commerce from Secretary of the Interior and prior transfers, see note set out under section 755 of this title.
### §157c. Boundary revision; acquisition of lands and interests; authorization of appropriations

The boundary of the Big Bend National Park in the State of Texas is hereby revised to include the lands and interests therein within the area generally depicted on the map entitled "Big Bend National Park, Boundary Additions", numbered 155/80,019–A and dated June 1980 which shall be on file and available for public inspection in the local and Washington, District of Columbia, Offices of the National Park Service, Department of the Interior. The Secretary is authorized to acquire the lands and interests therein added to the park by this section by donation, purchase with donated or appropriated funds, or exchange, except that lands and interests therein owned by the State of Texas or any political subdivision thereof may be acquired only by donation or exchange. There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this section, but not to exceed $1,500,000 for the acquisition of lands and interests therein.

(Pub. L. 96–607, title IV, §401, Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3539.)
<PAGE>


Exhibit 99.1
Certification of Robert C. Goodwin
August 13, 2002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q of DAC
Technologies Group International, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended
June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert C. Goodwin, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify that:

                           o        the Report fully complies with the
                                    requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                                    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
                           o        information contained in the Report fairly
                                    presents, in all material respects, the
                                    financial condition and results of
                                    operations of the Company.

                   /s/ Robert C. Goodwin
                  -----------------------
                  Chief Financial Officer

Date:             August 13, 2002
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 5007 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand certain exceptions 

to the private activity bond rules for first-time farmers, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 8, 2019 

Ms. FINKENAUER (for herself, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mrs. AXNE, Mr. LOEBSACK, 

Mr. WATKINS, and Mr. FORTENBERRY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand 

certain exceptions to the private activity bond rules for 

first-time farmers, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farmers’ Access to 

5 Resources and Machinery Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS TO THE PRI7 VATE ACTIVITY BOND RULES FOR FIRST8 TIME FARMERS. 

9 (a) INCREASE IN DOLLAR LIMITATION.— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5007 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 147(c)(2)(A) of the 

2 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik3 ing ‘‘$450,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$524,200’’. 

4 (2) REPEAL OF SEPARATE LOWER DOLLAR LIM5 ITATION ON USED FARM EQUIPMENT.—Section 

6 147(c)(2) of such Code is amended by striking sub7 paragraph (F) and by redesignating subparagraphs 

8 (G) and (H) as subparagraphs (F) and (G), respec9 tively. 

10 (3) QUALIFIED SMALL ISSUE BOND LIMITATION

11 CONFORMED TO INCREASED DOLLAR LIMITATION.— 

12 Section 144(a)(11)(A) of such Code is amended by 

13 striking ‘‘$250,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$524,200’’. 

14 (4) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.— 

15 (A) IN GENERAL.—Section 147(c)(2)(G) of 

16 such Code, as redesignated by paragraph (2), is 

17 amended— 

18 (i) by striking ‘‘after 2008, the dollar 

19 amount in subparagraph (A) shall be in20 creased’’ and inserting ‘‘after 2020, the 

21 dollar amounts in subparagraph (A) and 

22 section 144(a)(11)(A) shall each be in23 creased’’; and 

24 (ii) by striking ‘‘2007’’ in clause (ii) 

25 and inserting ‘‘2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5007 IH

1 (B) CROSS-REFERENCE.—Section 

2 144(a)(11) of such Code is amended by adding 

3 at the end the following new subparagraph: 

4 ‘‘(D) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—For infla5 tion adjustment of dollar amount contained in 

6 subparagraph (A), see section 147(c)(2)(G).’’. 

7 (b) SUBSTANTIAL FARMLAND DETERMINED ON

8 BASIS OF AVERAGE RATHER THAN MEDIAN FARM

9 SIZE.—Section 147(c)(2)(E) of such Code is amended by 

10 striking ‘‘median’’ and inserting ‘‘average’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to bonds issued after the date of 

13 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
§ 303.103 Abrogation of State sovereign immunity. ( a ) *General.* A State is not immune under the 11th amendment of the Constitution of the United States from suit in Federal court for a violation of part C of the Act.
( b ) *Remedies.* In a suit against a State for a violation of part C of the Act, remedies (including remedies both at law and in equity) are available for such a violation to the same extent as those remedies are available for such a violation in a suit against any public entity other than a State.
( c ) *Effective date.* Paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section apply with respect to violations that occur in whole or part after October 30, 1990, the date of enactment of the Education of the Handicapped Act Amendments of 1990.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1403)
Exhibit 23

               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 2-78323, 33-9082, 33-26468, 33-33701, 333-19007,
333-27935, 333-35059, 333-57977, 333-57979, 333-40666, 333-40664, 333-40658,
333-100055) and S-3 (Nos. 333-65825 and 333-80249) of Hughes Supply, Inc. of our
reports dated March 26, 2003, relating to the financial statements and financial
statement schedule, which appear in this Form 10K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Orlando, Florida
April 17,  2003
§ 385.33 What other factors does the Secretary consider in reviewing an application? In addition to the selection criteria listed in § 75.210 and parts 386, 387, and 390, the Secretary, in making awards under this program, considers such factors as— ( a ) The geographical distribution of projects in each Rehabilitation Training Program category throughout the country; and
( b ) The past performance of the applicant in carrying out similar training activities under previously awarded grants, as indicated by such factors as compliance with grant conditions, soundness of programmatic and financial management practices and attainment of established project objectives.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 302(b) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 772(b))
#### Jennie E. Noonan, Respondent, v. Thomas C. Luther, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event, upon the ground that the verdict is excessive, unless the plaintiff within twenty days stipulates to reduce the verdict to $500, in which ease the judgment is so modified and as so modified judgment and order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concurred, except Kellogg, J., who voted for a reversal.
### §91. Establishment; boundaries; trespassers

All those certain tracts, pieces, or parcels of land lying and being in the State of Washington, and within the boundaries particularly described as follows, to wit: Beginning at a point three miles east of the northeast corner of township numbered 17 north, of range 6 east of the Willamette meridian; thence south through the central parts of townships numbered 17, 16, and 15 north, of range 7 east of the Willamette meridian, 18 miles more or less, subject to the proper easterly or westerly offsets, to a point three miles east of the northeast corner of township numbered 14 north, of range 6 east of the Willamette meridian; thence east on the township line between townships numbered 14 and 15 north, 18 miles more or less to a point 3 miles west of the northeast corner of township 14 north, of range 10 east of the Willamette meridian; thence northerly subject to the proper easterly or westerly offsets, 18 miles more or less, to a point 3 miles west of the northeast corner of township numbered 17 north of range 10 east of the Willamette meridian (but in locating said easterly boundary, wherever the summit of the Cascade Mountains is sharply and well defined, the said line shall follow the said summit, where the said summit line bears west of the easterly line as herein determined); thence westerly along the township line between said townships numbered 17 and 18 to the place of beginning, are dedicated and set apart as a public park to be known and designated as the Mount Rainier National Park, for the benefit and enjoyment of the people; and all persons who shall locate or settle upon or occupy the same, or any part thereof, except as hereafter provided, shall be considered trespassers and be removed therefrom.

(Mar. 2, 1899, ch. 377, §1, 30 Stat. 993.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 108–312, §1, Oct. 5, 2004, 118 Stat. 1194, provided that: "This Act [enacting section 110d of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 110d of this title] may be cited as the 'Mount Rainier National Park Boundary Adjustment Act of 2004'."
§ 300.132 Provision of services for parentally-placed private school children with disabilities—basic requirement. ( a ) *General.* To the extent consistent with the number and location of children with disabilities who are enrolled by their parents in private, including religious, elementary schools and secondary schools located in the school district served by the LEA, provision is made for the participation of those children in the program assisted or carried out under Part B of the Act by providing them with special education and related services, including direct services determined in accordance with § 300.137, unless the Secretary has arranged for services to those children under the by-pass provisions in §§ 300.190 through 300.198.
( b ) *Services plan for parentally-placed private school children with disabilities.* In accordance with paragraph (a) of this section and §§ 300.137 through 300.139, a services plan must be developed and implemented for each private school child with a disability who has been designated by the LEA in which the private school is located to receive special education and related services under this part.
( c ) *Record keeping.* Each LEA must maintain in its records, and provide to the SEA, the following information related to parentally-placed private school children covered under §§ 300.130 through 300.144: ( 1 ) The number of children evaluated;
( 2 ) The number of children determined to be children with disabilities; and
( 3 ) The number of children served.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 1820-0030 and 1820-0600) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(10)(A)(i))
AAM-11-366-E 

July 11, 2011 

 Exemption No. 10220A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0170 

Mr. Lawrence Ihle 

Coastal Helicopters, LLC 

P.O. Box 715 

Nags Head, NC 27959 

Dear Mr. Ihle: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to amend Exemption 

No. 10220. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated June 15, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Coastal Helicopters, LLC (Coastal) for an amendment to Exemption No. 10220. 

That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows 

Coastal, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safetysensitive employees under one testing program. The amendment you request would add OBX 

Biplanes, LLC (LOA No. OBBJ0001) to your exemption. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Coastal. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10220, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the conditions and 

limitations listed below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Coastal and OBX Biplanes are subject to the drug and alcohol 

regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the 

Coastal part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

The termination date of Exemption No. 10220, as amended, remains March 31, 2013, unless 

sooner superseded or rescinded. Our decision amends the Coastal exemption to include OBX 

Biplanes, LLC. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-2843

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

v. * District of Arkansas.

*

Billy Edward Welch, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: May 3, 1999

Filed: May 12, 1999

___________

Before BEAM, HANSEN, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Billy Edward Welch pleaded guilty for conspiring to distribute methamphetamine

and for attempting to escape. On appeal, Welch contends the district court improperly

rejected his request to withdraw his guilty plea. Having searched the record and

considered the parties' submissions, we find no merit in Welch's contention that he had

been subjected to threats and intimidation by Arkansas law enforcement officers. We

decline to consider Welch's ineffective assistance of counsel arguments. See United

States v. Iversen, 90 F.3d 1340, 1342 (8th Cir. 1996) (ineffective assistance claim

raised for first time on appeal is properly addressed in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion). We

thus affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 83070 / April 19, 2018

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-18348

In the Matter of

Gemini Fund Services, LLC

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

By order dated June 30, 2017, the Commission issued the “Omnibus Order Directing the 

Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that Establish Distribution 

Funds” (“Omnibus Order”),1authorizing the Secretary to issue orders beginning June 2017 and for 

calendar year 2018 appointing, upon request by the Commission staff, Miller Kaplan Arase LLP, a 

certified public accounting firm, which acquired Damasco & Associates LLP (“Miller Kaplan”), 

with one of their offices located in San Francisco, California, as tax administrator (“Tax 

Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund may incur tax-related 

obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department of the Treasury 

Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On April 19, 2018, the Commission staff requested the appointment of Miller Kaplan as 

the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Miller Kaplan, pursuant to and in accordance with the 

Omnibus Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Brent J. Fields

Secretary

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 81057 (June 30, 2017).
### §1036. Entry by false pretenses to any real property, vessel, or aircraft of the United States or secure area of any airport or seaport

(a) Whoever, by any fraud or false pretense, enters or attempts to enter—

(1) any real property belonging in whole or in part to, or leased by, the United States;

(2) any vessel or aircraft belonging in whole or in part to, or leased by, the United States;

(3) any secure or restricted area of any seaport, designated as secure in an approved security plan, as required under section 70103 of title 46, United States Code, and the rules and regulations promulgated under that section; or

(4) any secure area of any airport,

shall be punished as provided in subsection (b) of this section.

(b) The punishment for an offense under subsection (a) of this section is—

(1) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both, if the offense is committed with the intent to commit a felony; or

(2) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 6 months, or both, in any other case.

(c) As used in this section—

(1) the term "secure area" means an area access to which is restricted by the airport authority, captain of the seaport, or a public agency; and

(2) the term "airport" has the meaning given such term in section 47102 of title 49.

(Added Pub. L. 106–547, §2(a), Dec. 19, 2000, 114 Stat. 2738; amended Pub. L. 109–177, title III, §302(a), Mar. 9, 2006, 120 Stat. 233.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–177, §302(a)(4), substituted "any airport or seaport" for "any airport" in section catchline.

Subsec. (a)(3), (4). Pub. L. 109–177, §302(a)(1), added par. (3) and redesignated former par. (3) as (4).

Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 109–177, §302(a)(2), substituted "10 years" for "5 years".

Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 109–177, §302(a)(3), inserted ", captain of the seaport," after "airport authority".
### §94. Location of mining claims

The location of mining claims under the mineral land laws of the United States is prohibited within the area of the Mount Rainier National Park, in the State of Washington. This provision shall not affect rights acquired in good faith before May 27, 1908, under the mineral land laws of the United States to any mining location or locations in said Mount Rainier National Park.

(May 27, 1908, ch. 200, §1, 35 Stat. 365.)
### §450jj–9. Activities in Memorial area pending submission of plan

Pending submission of the Commission's plan, any Federal entity conducting or supporting significant activities directly affecting East Saint Louis, Illinois, generally and the site specifically referred to in section 450jj–3 of this title shall—

(1) consult with the Secretary of the Interior and the Commission with respect to such activities;

(2) cooperate with the Secretary of the Interior and the Commission in carrying out their duties under sections 450jj to 450jj–9 of this title, and to the maximum extent practicable, coordinate such activities with the carrying out of such duties; and

(3) to the maximum extent practicable, conduct or support such activities in a manner which the Secretary determines will not have an adverse effect on the Memorial.

(May 17, 1954, ch. 204, §10, as added Pub. L. 98–398, title II, §201(a), Aug. 24, 1984, 98 Stat. 1471.)
### §5962. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 105–391, title IV, §413, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3515, related to use of nonmonetary consideration in concessions contracts. See section 101922 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
§ 200.73 Applicable hold-harmless provisions. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) Except as authorized under paragraph (c) of this section and § 200.100(d)(2), an SEA may not reduce the allocation of an eligible LEA below the hold-harmless amounts established under paragraph (a)(4) of this section.
( 2 ) The hold-harmless protection limits the maximum reduction of an LEA's allocation compared to the LEA's allocation for the preceding year.
( 3 ) Except as provided in § 200.100(d), an SEA must apply the hold-harmless requirement separately for basic grants, concentration grants, targeted grants, and education finance incentive grants as described in paragraph (a)(4) of this section.
( 4 ) Under sections 1122(c) and 1125A(f)(3) of the ESEA, the hold-harmless percentage varies based on the LEA's proportion of formula children, as shown in the following table: LEA's number of formula children ages 5 to 17, inclusive, as a percentage of its total population of children ages 5 to 17,inclusive
Hold-harmlesspercentage
Applicable grant formulas (i) 30% or more(ii) 15% or more but less than 30%(iii) Less than 15%
959085
Basic Grants, Concentration Grants, Targeted Grants, and Education Finance Incentive Grants.
( b ) *Targeted grants and education finance incentive grants.* The number of formula children used to determine the hold-harmless percentage is the number before applying the weights described in section 1125 and section 1125A of the ESEA.
( c ) *Adjustment for insufficient funds.* If the amounts made available to the State are insufficient to pay the full amount that each LEA is eligible to receive under paragraph (a)(4) of this section, the SEA must ratably reduce the allocations for all LEAs in the State to the amount available.
( d ) *Eligibility for hold-harmless protection.* ( 1 ) An LEA must meet the eligibility requirements for a basic grant, targeted grant, or education finance incentive grant under § 200.71 in order for the applicable hold-harmless provision to apply.
( 2 ) An LEA not meeting the eligibility requirements for a concentration grant under § 200.71 must be paid its hold-harmless amount for four consecutive years.
( e ) *Hold-harmless protection for a newly opened or significantly expanded charter school LEA.* An SEA must calculate a hold-harmless base for the prior year for a newly opened or significantly expanded charter school LEA that, as applicable, reflects the new or significantly expanded enrollment of the charter school LEA.
[82 FR 31711, July 7, 2017, as amended at 84 FR 31675, July 2, 2019]