alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Department of Health and Human Servces


OFFICE OF


INSPECTOR GENERAL


MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES' PLANS FOR 

FINANCING NURSING HOME CARE 

:v. 

"0 

Richard P. Kusserow 

INSPECfOR GENERA 

cIa OEI-090-89031 
PUROSE 

This report presents Medicare beneficiaries' assessments of their abilty to pay for 

nursing home care. 

BACKGROUN 

In 1989, the Offce of Inspector General (OIG) for the Department of Health and 

Human Servces conducted a national survey to assess Medicare beneficiaries 

experience and satisfaction with various aspects of the Medicare program. The results 

are in the report "A Survey of Medicare Beneficiary Satisfaction: 1989" (OAI-04-89­

89040). In one segment of the survey, we ascertained beneficiaries' knowledge of 

nursing home careprovisions--and.thei p()tentia1-abilty.to-pay for such servces. 

In 1991, the OIG conducted another satisfaction survey, the findings of which are 

presented in the report "Medicare Beneficiary Satisfaction: 1991" (OEI-04-90-89030). 

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) reviewed the questionnaires for both 

surveys. During the clearance process for the 1991 survey, the OMB asked the OIG 

to again evaluate the abilty of beneficiaries to pay for nursing home care. 

MEllODS 

In December 1990 we mailed a survey instrument to 637 randomly selected 

beneficiaries for whom Medicare Part B claims had been fied in Calendar Year 1989. 

Their participation in the survey was voluntary. 

A total of 519 beneficiaries returned completed questionnaires, for a response rate of 

83 percent. 

FIINGS 

In the 1991 survey we found that: 

Most benri cannt pay for nug home care. 

Of the 519 respondents, 445 answered questions on their abilty to pay for nursing 

home care. Seventy-two percent said they cannot pay for nursing home care, should 

they ever need it. 

Of those who said they have a way to pay for nursing home care: 

Fort-seven percent said they would rely on personal assets such as savings. 

One-third (33 percent) said they would rely on private insurance. 
Twenty percent said they would rely on Medicaid, although only half of that 

group said they are currently covered by Medicaid. 

Some benciri said the thought tht Medicare pays for nug home care. 

Twenty-five percent of beneficiaries said they thought that Medicare pays for nursing 

home custodial care, although it does not. Medicare only pays for skilled nursing care 

and then for just a limited period of time and under specific circumstances. 

CONCLUSION 

Most beneficiaries (72 percent) indicate they have not made adequate plans should 

they need nursing home- care;.-This--finding..is identical to. the-results obtained from the 

1989 survey.
# Official Journal C 225/14 S

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 225 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4814 September 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 225

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4814 September 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 225/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 225/2 | Commission opinion of 13 September 2005 concerning the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste arising from the decommissioning and dismantling of the TRIGA — Mark I Research Reactor at the Medical University of Hannover located in Lower Saxony in the Federal Republic of Germany, in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty | 2 |
| 2005/C 225/3 | Publication of an application for registration pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin | 3 |
| 2005/C 225/4 | Information procedure — Technical rules (1) | 8 |
| 2005/C 225/5 | Commission notice pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 — Imposition of a public service obligation in respect of scheduled air services within Italy (1) | 13 |
| 2005/C 225/6 | Imposition of a public service obligation pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 for scheduled air services within Germany (1) | 15 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 225/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 225/2

Commission opinion of 13 September 2005 concerning the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste arising from the decommissioning and dismantling of the TRIGA — Mark I Research Reactor at the Medical University of Hannover located in Lower Saxony in the Federal Republic of Germany, in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty

2

2005/C 225/3

Publication of an application for registration pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin

3

2005/C 225/4

Information procedure — Technical rules (1)

8

2005/C 225/5

Commission notice pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 — Imposition of a public service obligation in respect of scheduled air services within Italy (1)

13

2005/C 225/6

Imposition of a public service obligation pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 for scheduled air services within Germany (1)

15

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 31.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeffrey Dashefsky, President, Secretary/Treasurer and Director of FormCap
Corp. certify that :

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of FormCap Corp.

2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue
   statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
   make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
   statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
   this Quarterly Report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all
   material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
   flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
   Quarterly Report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
   procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
   Registrant and I have:

   a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
      material information relating to the Registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report
      is being prepared;

   b. evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      Quarterly Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

   c. presented in this Quarterly Report my conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's
   auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or
   persons performing the equivalent function);

   a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to
      record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
      identified for the Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
      internal controls; and

   b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal
      controls.


Dated : April 23, 2008        Signature : /s/ Jeffrey Dashefsky
                                          ---------------------
                                              Jeffrey Dashefsky
                                              President, Secretary/Treasurer
                                              and Director


<PAGE>
### §971b–1. Species working groups

The United States Commissioners may establish species working groups for the purpose of providing advice and recommendations to the Commissioners and the advisory committee on matters relating to the conservation and management of any highly migratory species covered by the Convention. Any species working group shall consist of no more than seven members of the advisory committee and no more than four scientific or technical personnel, as considered necessary by the Commissioner.

(Pub. L. 94–70, §4A, as added Pub. L. 101–627, title II, §205, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4460.)
# Official Journal C 300I/2018

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 300I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6127 August 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 300I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6127 August 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 300 I/01 | Notice for the attention of Mohammed Yusip Karim, Mohamad Rafi Bin Udin and Muhammed Reza Lahaman Kiram, whose names were added to the list referred to in Articles 2, 3 and 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations, by virtue of Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/1204 | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2018/C 300 I/01

Notice for the attention of Mohammed Yusip Karim, Mohamad Rafi Bin Udin and Muhammed Reza Lahaman Kiram, whose names were added to the list referred to in Articles 2, 3 and 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations, by virtue of Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/1204

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Ex-12b

                                                         IDACORP, Inc.
                                           Consolidated Financial Information
                    Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends Requirements

                                                Twelve Months Ended December 31,
                                                    (Thousands of Dollars)

                                                   1994         1995        1996         1997         1998
<S>                                              <C>          <C>         <C>          <C>          <C>
Earnings, as defined:
    Income before income taxes.................. $101,775     $127,342    $135,247     $133,570     $133,806
    Adjust for distributed income of equity
      investees.................................      326       (2,058)     (1,413)      (3,943)      (4,697)
    Equity in loss of equity method
      investments...............................        0            0           0            0          458
    Minority interest in losses of majority
      owned subs................................        0            0           0            0         (125)
    Fixed charges, as below.....................   66,324       70,215      70,418       69,634       69,923

        Total earnings, as defined.............. $168,425     $195,499    $204,252     $199,261     $199,365

Fixed charges, as defined:
    Interest charges............................  $54,433      $56,456     $57,348      $60,761      $60,677
    Preferred stock dividends of subsidiaries-
      gross up-Idcrp rate.......................   11,097       12,834      12,079        7,891        8,445
    Rental interest factor......................      794          925         991          982          801

        Total fixed charges.....................   66,324       70,215      70,418       69,634       69,923

    Preferred dividends requirements............        0            0           0            0            0

        Total combined fixed charges and
          preferred dividends...................  $66,324      $70,215     $70,418      $69,634      $69,923

Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges
  and preferred dividends.......................    2.54x        2.78x       2.90x        2.86x        2.85x

Exhibit 12-B

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 61 (Wednesday, March 30, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7422]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive Patent License; Quest 
Integrated, Inc.

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent 
to grant to Quest Integrated, Inc. a revocable, nonassignable, 
exclusive license to practice in the fields of use of cable, guy wire 
and other structural wire rope inspections in the United States and its 
territories, for the Government-owned invention represented by U.S. 
Statutory Invention Registration No. 13/038,574 entitled, ``Onboard 
Data Recorder for a Nondestructive Test Wire Rope Sensor Head'' (Navy 
Case No. 100986).

DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file 
written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later 
than April 14, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be filed with the NAVFAC-ESC, Code 
CI60, 1100 23rd Avenue, Port Hueneme, CA 93043-4370 attention Kurt 
Buehler.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kurt Buehler, Technology Transfer 
Office, NAVFAC-ESC, Code CI60, 1100 23rd Avenue, Port Hueneme, CA 
93043-4370, telephone: 805-982-1225. Due to U.S. Postal delays, please 
fax: 805-982-3481, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1c77696e68327e69797470796e5c727d6a6532717570"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="711a0403055f130414191d1403311f1007085f1c181d">[email protected]</span></a> or use courier 
delivery to expedite response.

(Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.)

    Dated: March 23, 2011.
D.J. Werner,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-7422 Filed 3-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §5722. Advisory committee

#### (a) Appointments

The Governor of Alaska may establish and appoint an advisory committee of not less than eight, but not more than 12, individuals who are knowledgeable and experienced with regard to the salmon fisheries on the Yukon River. At least two of the advisory committee members shall be Alaska Natives. Members of the advisory committee may attend all meetings of the Panel, and shall be given the opportunity to examine and be heard on any matter under consideration by the Panel.

#### (b) Compensation

The members of such advisory committee shall receive no compensation for their services.

#### (c) Term length

Members of such advisory committee shall serve 2-year terms. Any individual appointed to fill a vacancy occurring before the expiration of any term shall be appointed for the remainder of that term.

#### (d) Reappointment

Members of such advisory committee shall be eligible for reappointment.

(Pub. L. 106–450, title II, §203, Nov. 7, 2000, 114 Stat. 1943.)
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-64737, 333-83434, and 333-103917 onForm S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-65157, 333-65406, 333-104254,333-125259, and 333-143404 on Form S-8 of IDACORP, Inc. and RegistrationStatement No. 333-147807 on Form S-3and Registration Statement No. 333-66496 on Form S-8 of Idaho Power Company ofour reports dated February 27, 2008, relating to the consolidated financialstatements and financial statement schedules of IDACORP, Inc. and Idaho PowerCompany (which reports express an unqualified opinion and include an explanatoryparagraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial AccountingStandards No. 158 and Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No.48), and the effectiveness of IDACORP, Inc. and Idaho Power Company's internalcontrol over financial reporting,  appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kof IDACORP, Inc. and Idaho Power Company for the year ended December 31, 2007.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Boise, Idaho

February 27, 2008

----
§ 101.21 Parties. ( a ) The term party shall include an applicant or recipient or other person to whom a notice of hearing or opportunity for hearing has been mailed naming him a respondent.
( b ) The Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights of the Department of Education, shall be deemed a party to all proceedings.
#### William G. ROELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF BOISE, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant— Appellee.

No. 00-36091. D.C. No. CV-99-00444-EJL.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 2002 *.

Decided May 13, 2002.

Before RYMER, McKEOWN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

We have previously held that the applicable statute of limitations for § 1983 actions brought in Idaho is governed by Idaho Code § 5-219(4), which provides for a limitations period of two years from the date the cause of action accrues. *Hallstrom v. Garden City,*991 F.2d 1473, 1476 *590(1993). Because Roell brought this claim well after the limitations period had run, his action is time-barred. Neither the Supreme Court’s decision in *Wilson v. Garcia,*471 U.S. 261, 105 S.Ct. 1938, 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985), nor its reconsideration of this issue in *Owens v. Okure,*488 U.S. 235, 109 S.Ct. 573, 102 L.Ed.2d 594 (1989), provides support for Roell’s claim that Idaho’s residual catch-all limitations provision applies. “Courts should resort to residual statute of limitations only where state law provides multiple statutes of limitations for personal injury *and*the residual one embraces, either explicitly or by judicial construction, unspecified personal injury actions.” *Owens,*488 U.S. at 250 n. 12, 109 S.Ct. 573 (emphasis added). Idaho’s catch-all statute does not satisfy this latter requirement.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
### §590p. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–127, title III, §336(b)(1), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1006

Section, act Apr. 27, 1935, ch. 85, §16, as added Feb. 29, 1936, ch. 104, §1, 49 Stat. 1151; amended Aug. 7, 1956, ch. 1030, §1, 70 Stat. 1115; Sept. 14, 1960, Pub. L. 86–793, §1, 74 Stat. 1030; Mar. 22, 1961, Pub. L. 87–5, §2, 75 Stat. 6; Aug. 8, 1961, Pub. L. 87–128, title I, §132, title IV, §401, 75 Stat. 302, 319; Mar. 30, 1962, Pub. L. 87–425, §2, 76 Stat. 50; May 15, 1962, Pub. L. 87–451, §4, 76 Stat. 70; Sept. 27, 1962, Pub. L. 87–703, title I, §101(4), (5), title III, §302, 76 Stat. 606, 607, 612; May 20, 1963, Pub. L. 88–26, §3, 77 Stat. 45; Nov. 3, 1965, Pub. L. 89–321, title III, §302, title VI, §602(g), 79 Stat. 1190, 1208; Oct. 11, 1968, Pub. L. 90–559, §1(1), 82 Stat. 996; Nov. 18, 1969, Pub. L. 91–118, §§1–3, 83 Stat. 194, 195; Nov. 30, 1970, Pub. L. 91–524, title VIII, §801, 84 Stat. 1379; June 6, 1980, Pub. L. 96–263, §1, 94 Stat. 438; Nov. 28, 1990, Pub. L. 101–624, title XIV, §1455, 104 Stat. 3614; Nov. 2, 1994, Pub. L. 103–437, §6(s), 108 Stat. 4587, related to limitation on obligations incurred for purpose of carrying out certain sections and Great Plains conservation program.
- Newsroom        - Press Releases
      - Public Statements
      - Speeches
      - Testimony
      - Spotlight Topics
      - Media Gallery
      - Upcoming Events
      - Webcasts
      - What's New
      - SEC Videos
      - Reports and Publications
      - RSS Feeds
      - Social Media 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

**TIME AND DATE:** Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission Investor Advisory Committee will hold a public meeting on Thursday September 24, 2020, by remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F St NE, Washington, DC 20549.

The meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public via remote means.

**PLACE:** The meeting will be conducted by remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F St NE, Washington, DC 20549. Members of the public may watch the webcast of the meeting on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov.

**STATUS:** This Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a majority of the Commission may attend the meeting. On August 31, 2020, the Commission published notice of the Committee meeting (Release Nos. 33-10830; 34-89713), indicating that the meeting is open to the public and inviting the public to submit written comments to the Committee.

**MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:** The agenda for the meeting includes: welcome remarks; approval of previous meeting minutes; a panel discussion regarding self-directed IRAs; a panel discussion regarding minority community investor inclusion; a discussion of a recommendation to restate and amend the by-laws of the Committee; subcommittee reports; and a non-public administrative session.

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:** For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: September 14, 2020

Vanessa A. CountrymanSecretary
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

KAREN DAVIS, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL 

BOARD (PA SOCIAL SERVICES UNION 

AND NETHERLANDS INSURANCE 

COMPANY), 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 38 WAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 8th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.