alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, James D. Bowden, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Excelsior Venture Partners III, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 14, 2009                              
|                                                      
|/s/    James D. Bowden                                
|James D. Bowden, President and Chief Executive
Officer
**U.S. Department** 

**of Transportation**  **Federal Aviation**  **Administration Office**  **of Adjudication**  **October 20,**  **2016 VIA**  **FAX and**  **U.S. Mail**  **Amanda Bruchs Sheridan,**  **Esq. Federal** **Aviation Administration**  **Enforcement Division,**  **AGC-300 800** **Independence Avenue,**  **SW Washington,**  **DC 20591**  **800 Independence**  **Ave., S.W,**  **Rm 323**  **Washington, D.C.**  **20591**

**William J.**  **Dobitsch, Jr.**  **President Endless**  **Mountain Air,**  **Inc. Seamans** **Airport 65**  **Windsock Lane**  **Factoryville, PA**  **18419 Re:**  **Endless Mountain**  **Air, Inc.,** **DMS No.**  **FAA-2013-0848 Dear**  **Mr. Dobitsch**  **and Ms.**  **Sheridan: The**  **parties' reply**  **briefs in**  **this case**  **were due**  **to be**  **filed no**  **later than**  **September 8,**  **2016. The**  **Office of**  **Adjudication received**  **Complainant's reply**  **brief dated**  **August 29,**  **2016, but**  **has not**  **received a**  **reply brief**  **from Respondent.**  **Nor has**  **any request**  **for an**  **extension of**  **time been received.**  **Accordingly, the record**  **in this**  **case is**  **now closed**  **and the matter will proceed**  **to a**  **decision of** **the FAA** **Administrator. Sincerely,** 

**Director and** **Administrative Judge**
§ 222.44 How does the Secretary determine a maximum payment for local educational agencies that are eligible for financial assistance under section 8003(b)(1)(F) and § 222.43? The Secretary determines a maximum payment under section 8003(b)(1)(F) for an eligible LEA, using data from the third preceding fiscal year, as follows: ( a ) Subject to paragraph (b) of this section, the Secretary increases the eligible LEA's local contribution rate (LCR) for section 8003(b) payment purposes to the amount the Secretary determines will compensate the applicant for the increase in its current expenditures necessitated by the unusual geographic factors identified under § 222.43(b)(2).
( b ) The Secretary does not increase the LCR under this section to an amount that is more than— ( 1 ) Is necessary to allow the applicant to provide a level of education equivalent to that provided by its generally comparable LEAs; or
( 2 ) The per pupil share for all children in ADA of the increased current expenditures necessitated by the unusual geographic factors identified under § 222.43, as determined by the Secretary.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7703(b)(1)(F))
[80 FR 33165, June 11, 2015]
#### § 316.1 Definitions.

As used in this part, the term:

*Application* means any form, as defined in 8 CFR part 1, on which an applicant requests a benefit relating to naturalization.

*Residence in the Service district where the application is filed* means residence in the geographical area over which a particular local field office of USCIS ordinarily has jurisdiction for purposes of naturalization, regardless of where or how USCIS may require such benefit request to be submitted, or whether jurisdiction for the purpose of adjudication is relocated or internally reassigned to another USCIS office.

*Service district* means the geographical area over which a particular local field office of USCIS ordinarily has jurisdiction for purposes of naturalization.

[76 FR 53798, Aug. 29, 2011]
### SUBCHAPTER A—PROBATION

#### SUBCHAPTER A—PROBATION 1

Sec.
3601.
Supervision of probation.
3602.
Appointment of probation officers.
3603.
Duties of probation officers.
3604.
Transportation of a probationer.
3605.
Transfer of jurisdiction over a probationer.
3606.
Arrest and return of a probationer.
3607.
Special probation and expungement procedures for drug possessors.
3608.
Drug testing of Federal offenders on post-conviction release.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–322, title II, §20414(a)(2), title XXXIII, §330010(3), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1830, 2143, transferred analysis of this subchapter to follow heading for this subchapter and added item 3608.

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXV, §3590, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4930, substituted "possessors" for "possessor" in item 3607.

1  So in original. Probably should not appear.
----

Information procedure — Technical rules

(2005/C 89/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services. (OJ L 204, 21.7.1998, p. 37; OJ L 217, 5.8.1998, p. 18).

Notifications of draft national technical rules received by the Commission

The Commission draws attention to the judgement delivered on 30 April 1996 in the ‘CIA Security’ case (C-194/94 — ECR I, p. 2201), in which the Court of Justice ruled that Articles 8 and 9 of Directive 98/34/EC (formerly 83/189/EEC) are to be interpreted as meaning that individuals may rely on them before national courts which must decline to apply a national technical regulation which has not been notified in accordance with the Directive.

This judgement confirms the Commission's communication of 1 October 1986 (OJ C 245, 1.10.1986, p. 4).

Accordingly, breach of the obligation to notify renders the technical regulations concerned inapplicable, and consequently unenforceable against individuals.

For more information on the notification procedure, please write to:

Also consult the website: http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/tris/

If you require any further information on these notifications, please contact the national departments listed below:

LIST OF NATIONAL DEPARTMENTS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF DIRECTIVE 98/34/EC

BELGIUM

CZECH REPUBLIC

DENMARK

GERMANY

ESTONIA

GREECE

SPAIN

FRANCE

IRELAND

ITALY

CYPRUS

LATVIA

LITHUANIA

LUXEMBOURG

HUNGARY

MALTA

NETHERLANDS

AUSTRIA

POLAND

PORTUGAL

SLOVENIA

SLOVAKIA

FINLAND

SWEDEN

UNITED KINGDOM

EFTA - ESA

TURKEY

----

(1)  Year — registration number — Member State of origin.

(2)  Period during which the draft may not be adopted.

(3)  No standstill period since the Commission accepts the grounds of urgent adoption invoked by the notifying Member State.

(4)  No standstill period since the measure concerns technical specifications or other requirements or rules on services linked to fiscal or financial measures, pursuant to the third indent of the second paragraph of Article 1(11) of Directive 98/34/EC.

(5)  Information procedure closed.

----
EXHIBIT 23.1







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED

PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT







We have issued our report dated March 30, 2007, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Imperial Industries, Inc. (which report expressed an unqualified opinion and contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123 (R) Shared-Based Payment) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of the aforementioned reports in the Registration Statements of Imperial Industries, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-136203, effective on July 31, 2006), Form S-8 (File No. 333-136204, effective July 31, 2006) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-51106, effective December 1, 2000).





Grant Thornton LLP



Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

March 30, 2007
#### John Mauriello, an Infant, by Antonio Mauriello, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Daily Gazette Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET INCOME STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001102997
<NAME> INETVISIONZ.COM, INC.

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-2000             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          43,605                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  803,615                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (112,941)                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               744,914                       0
<PP&E>                                         752,009                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                               (265,632)                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,641,587                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,924,141                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        11,207                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (293,760)                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,641,587                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,009,634                 725,711
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  354,865                 281,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               688,906                 451,738
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (34,138)                 (7,980)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (34,138)                 (7,980)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (34,138)                 (7,980)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.003)                  (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.003)                  (.001)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION HAS BEEN EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS IN THE FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000041296
<NAME> GIANT GROUP, LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          12,644
<SECURITIES>                                    10,583
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,766
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,478
<PP&E>                                           5,757
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,198
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,059
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,742
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,047
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,018
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,299
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (6,544)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,263
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,649)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,912
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,912
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### §7803. Authority and responsibility of the Secretary of State

The Secretary of State may—

(1) receive and transmit, on behalf of the United States, reports, requests, recommendations, proposals, decisions, and other communications of and to the Commission;

(2) in consultation with the Secretary, act upon, or refer to other appropriate authority, any communication pursuant to paragraph (1); and

(3) with the concurrence of the Secretary, and in accordance with the South Pacific Fishery Resources Convention, object to decisions of the Commission.

(Pub. L. 114–327, title II, §203, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1989.)
#### § 222.42 [Reserved]
g:\blm\buttermp\ams\FinalFigures\fig2-27_PAOwnership1117.mxd 

Cascade County 

Lewis and Clark County 

Meagher County 

Powell County Helena 

East Helena 

£¤12 

Jefferson County 

§ ̈¦15 

£¤

Broadwater County 

12 Townsend 

Boulder 

Anaconda 

§ ̈¦90 

Deerlodge County 

£¤287 

Butte 

I BLM NPS US Gov't USFW Project Area and Ownership

0 Miles 10 BOR Private US Gov't/FS Unknown Butte Field Office - EIS

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Map RMP Planning Area, Montana Local Gov't State USFS Land Management (BLM) for use of Location FIGURE 2-27a data for purposes not intended by BLM.
NO. SCPW-12-0000430

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

CEDRIC AH SING, Petitioner,

vs.
THE HONORABLE RICHARD K. PERKINS, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CR. NO. 56581)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and McKenna, JJ. and Circuit Judge To # oto # o, in place of Duffy, J., recused) Upon consideration of petitioner Cedric Ah Sing's petition for a writ of mandamus, the respondent judge's answer, and the record of Cr. No. 56581, it appears that the petition for writ of habeas corpus submitted by petitioner was filed in Cr. No. 56581 on February 6, 2012 and was disposed of on May 7, 2012. Petitioner's request for mandamus relief is moot. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied as moot.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, June 14, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Fa # auuga L. To # oto # o Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-12-0000430 14-JUN-2012 09:25 AM
§ 33.12 Notice of hearing. ( a ) When the ALJ receives the complaint and answer, the ALJ shall promptly serve a notice of hearing upon the defendant in the manner prescribed by § 33.8. At the same time, the ALJ shall send a copy of the notice to the representative for the Government.
( b ) The notice must include: ( 1 ) The tentative time and place, and the nature of the hearing;
( 2 ) The legal authority and jurisdiction under which the hearing is to be held;
( 3 ) The matters of fact and law to be asserted;
( 4 ) A description of the procedures for the conduct of the hearing;
( 5 ) The name, address, and telephone number of the representative of the Government and of the defendant, if any; and
( 6 ) Such other matters as the ALJ deems appropriate.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3803(g)(2)(A))
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,271

 3,109

 2,900

 3,153

 3,330

 3,337

 3,599

 4,134

 4,318

 4,519

 4,384

 4,136

 4,080

 3,510

 3,380

 3,373

 2,768

 2,842

 2,751

 2,715

 2,660

 2,962

 2,896

 2,879

 3,192

 3,402

 3,427

 3,321

 3,073

 2,922

 2,781

 1,850

 1,706

 1,660

 1,514

 1,601

 1,585

 1,707

 1,902

 2,079

 1,808

 1,965

 1,823

 1,684

 1,704

 1,792

 1,915

 1,806

 1,655

 1,630

 1,597

 1,536

 1,490

 1,520

 1,453

 1,391

 1,550

 1,706

 1,715

 1,645

 1,594

 1,697

 2,548

 2,450

 2,303

 2,228

 2,402

 2,347

 2,553

 2,870

 2,979

 3,125

 2,910

 2,751

 2,557

 2,485

 2,495

 2,490

 2,285

 2,073

 2,015

 1,984

 1,997

 2,013

 2,070

 2,011

 2,145

 2,297

 2,388

 2,398

 2,287

 2,219

 2,237

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 8, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 977/2005

of 27 June 2005         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 June 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 June 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 27 June 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

NORFOLK DIVISION

____________________________________

 ) 

In re: ) 

 ) Case No. 17-71990-FJS

WINFRED ESCALANTE, JR., ) 

 ) Chapter 13 

 Debtor. ) 

____________________________________) 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On August 1, 2017, this Court held hearings on two Objections to Confirmation filed by 

Chartway Federal Credit Union and the Chapter 13 Trustee, respectively. At these hearings, 

Sherman C. Smith, counsel for the debtor, failed to appear without explanation. 

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Sherman C. Smith, Esquire, to appear at the United 

States Bankruptcy Court, 600 Granby Street, Norfolk, Virginia, at 10:00 a.m. on September 

26, 2017, and show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failing to appear at the 

hearings on the above-mentioned Objections to Confirmation to Chapter 13 Plan. 

The Clerk shall deliver copies of this Order to Sherman C. Smith, counsel for the debtor;

Winfred Escalante, Jr., the debtor; R. Clinton Stackhouse, Jr., Chapter 13 Trustee; Robyn D. 

Pepin, counsel for Chartway Federal Credit Union; and the Office of the United States Trustee. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

 FRANK J. SANTORO

 United States Bankruptcy Judge

Aug 1 2017 /s/ Frank J. Santoro

Entered on Docket: 08/02/2017

Case 17-71990-FJS Doc 19 Filed 08/02/17 Entered 08/02/17 11:13:37 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JEFFREY WILLIAM DENNIS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 647 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of March, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### Harold E. Ingram et al., Appellants, v. Harris S. Bigelow et al., Respondents.

No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.