alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 192.7 Procedures affecting States in noncompliance. ( a ) If FHWA determines that the State is not in compliance with 23 U.S.C. 159(a)(3), the State will be advised of the funds expected to be withheld under § 192.4 from apportionment, as part of the advance notice of apportionments required under 23 U.S.C. 104(e). This notification will normally occur not later than 90 days before the beginning of the fiscal year for which the sums to be apportioned are authorized. The State may, within 30 days of its receipt of the advance notice of apportionments, submit documentation demonstrating its compliance. Documentation shall be submitted electronically to the FHWA Division Administrator for that State. The FHWA Division Administrator shall retain an electronic copy and forward an electronic copy to both the FHWA Office of Safety and the FHWA Office of the Chief Counsel.
( b ) Each fiscal year, each State determined not to be in compliance with 23 U.S.C. 159(a)(3), based on FHWA's final determination, will receive notice of the funds being withheld under § 192.4 from apportionment, as part of the certification of apportionments required under 23 U.S.C. 104(e), which normally occurs on October 1 of each fiscal year.
United States Securities & Exchange Commission EDGAR Filing


EXHIBIT 10.27




Amendment 3 to Management Agreement




This Extension of the Management Agreement (“Agreement”) is between QMed BILLING, Inc., a Florida Corporation (“QMed”) and Central Florida Medical Billing Services, Inc., a Florida Corporation (herein referred to as “CFMBS”).  The Parties agree to the following:




This extension of the Agreement is made to the Agreement dated December 1, 2006.




The Agreement, as amended, will expire on September 30, 2007.  By mutual consent, the Agreement is extended until December 31, 2007.  The Agreement is attached to this extension and is part of this extension.  (See attached Agreement)




1.

All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged.




2.

The parties agree to extend the Agreement for an additional period, which begins immediately on the expiration of the original time period and the extension period under Amendment 2, and will end on December 31, 2007.




3.

As consideration for the extension of this Agreement, The Quantum Group, Inc. (“Parent Company”) grants 750 shares per month, which begins October 1, 2007 and will end on December 31, 2007, or earlier by mutual agreement.  Holder of Record will be in the name of Lorn Leitman.




4.

This Extension binds and benefits both parties and any successors.  This document, including the attached original Agreement, is the entire agreement between the parties.
















QMed BILLING, Inc.

Central Florida Medical Billing Services, Inc. 







/s/ Noel J. Guillama

/s/ Lorn Leitman

Noel J. Guillama

Lorn Leitman

President & CEO

President










Date 10/01/2007

Date 10/01/2007
§ 222.196 What additional construction and legal requirements apply? ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a grantee under this program must comply with— ( 1 ) The general construction legal requirements identified in the grant application assurances;
( 2 ) The prevailing wage standards in the grantee's locality that are established by the Secretary of Labor in accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 276a, *et seq.*); and
( 3 ) All relevant Federal, State, and local environmental laws and regulations.
( b ) A grantee that qualifies for a grant because it enrolls a high proportion of federally connected children who reside on Indian lands is considered to receive a grant award primarily for the benefit of Indians and must therefore comply with the Indian preference requirements of section 7(b) of the Indian Self-Determination Act.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7707(b) and 1221e-3)
#### § 300.803 Definition of State.

As used in this subpart, State means each of the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1419(i))
### Adams, Kevin (OST) From: 

### Sent: To:



### Cc: Subject:

, Attachments: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Hi All, 

# •··:1 1 

# "\R+MEi'l+ QF

. ::.:\t·.JSPORTATI0!\1 Adams, Kevm (OST) , .· ·•·:,; 

### fiPf.DATJ'"Ii\10 Monday, October 15,2012

## 2:~i''p~.__., '- 111

..

## ~),\•J 'Zane, 

### C. 

### J.';**steve.hatter@']lf¥~ -flOV,;** **Jber~ki~~r.lcet·net;** Scontras, Katherine; akutanadmin@gci.net;

### ricH.sew~ll@~l&sk~·~goJ,**H~d'a.bustamante@alaska.gov;** rebecca.cronkhite@alaska.gov; robert.e.lochmann@usps.gov;joy.c.doby@usps.gov; Congressional, Murkowski, Warren Wright (Warren_Wright@murkowski.senate.gov) ScottB@penair.com; patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com; robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com; Dockets Mail; BMcGiasson@FiyGrant.com; Devany, Dennis (OST) Request for Comment regarding EAS proposal Proposal of Grant Aviation.pdf

Attached above is a copy ofGrant Aviation's proposals for subsidized Essential Air Service (EAS) at Akun, Alaska. We are currently reviewing that proposal. The proposal is directlyfrom the carrier and is reflected in the Docket, which you may access through Regulations.gov at DOT-OST-2000-7068, along with other pertinent information on this proceeding. We received no other proposals in response to our request for proposals, Order2012-8-39. Community comments are a critically important element in our carrier-selection decision. We ask that you get back to us, preferably by email, no laterthan November 8, 2012. We will docket this email, as well as any replies. In brief, look atthe proposal, and ifyou have any questions, call me orthe carrier, and get back to DOT by the November 8 deadline. Best, Kevin Adams 202-366-1047

1
§ 244.4 Ineligible aliens. An alien is ineligible for Temporary Protected Status if the alien: ( a ) Has been convicted of any felony or two or more misdemeanors, as defined in § 244.1, committed in the United States, or
( b ) Is an alien described in section 208(b)(2)(A) of the Act.
[56 FR 619, Jan. 7, 1991, as amended at 56 FR 23497, May 22, 1991. Redesignated at 62 FR 10367, 10382, Mar. 6, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 63596, Nov. 16, 1998; 76 FR 53791, Aug. 29, 2011]
# Official Journal C 102/31 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 102 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6031 March 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 102

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6031 March 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 102/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 February 2017 to 28 February 2017(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |
| 2017/C 102/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 February 2017 to 28 February 2017(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC) | 10 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 102/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 February 2017 to 28 February 2017(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

2017/C 102/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 February 2017 to 28 February 2017(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

10

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Coconino Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Flagstaff, Arizona, to hear project proposals, review submissions and make decisions on which proposals will be recommended to the Designated Federal Official.

# DATES:

Project proposals will be heard on May 4, 2011, beginning at 9 a.m. until 4 p.m. The committee will also meet on May 5, 2011 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. to review presentations and decide which proposals to recommend, and the committee has also set aside May 6, 2011, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., as a day and time to meet in the case that more time is necessary to review projects and make decisions on proposals.

# ADDRESSES:

                        All of these meetings will be held in the Flagstaff City Hall Chambers, 211 W. Aspen, Flagstaff, Arizona. Send written comments to Brady Smith, RAC Coordinator, Coconino Resource Advisory Committee, c/o Forest Service, USDA, 1824 S. Thompson St., Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 or electronically to                         *bradysmith@fs.fed.us.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brady Smith, (928) 527-3490.

Dated: March 22, 2011.

Kristin Bail, 

Acting Forest Supervisor, Coconino National Forest.

[FR Doc. 2011-7208 Filed 3-25-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
Case 17-13753-KHK Doc 23-1 Filed 01/17/18 Entered 01/17/18 10:35:20 Desc 

 Loan Mod Page 1 of 11
Case 17-13753-KHK Doc 23-1 Filed 01/17/18 Entered 01/17/18 10:35:20 Desc 

 Loan Mod Page 2 of 11
Case 17-13753-KHK Doc 23-1 Filed 01/17/18 Entered 01/17/18 10:35:20 Desc 

 Loan Mod Page 3 of 11
Case 17-13753-KHK Doc 23-1 Filed 01/17/18 Entered 01/17/18 10:35:20 Desc 

 Loan Mod Page 4 of 11
Case 17-13753-KHK Doc 23-1 Filed 01/17/18 Entered 01/17/18 10:35:20 Desc 

 Loan Mod Page 5 of 11
Case 17-13753-KHK Doc 23-1 Filed 01/17/18 Entered 01/17/18 10:35:20 Desc 

 Loan Mod Page 6 of 11
Case 17-13753-KHK Doc 23-1 Filed 01/17/18 Entered 01/17/18 10:35:20 Desc 

 Loan Mod Page 7 of 11
Case 17-13753-KHK Doc 23-1 Filed 01/17/18 Entered 01/17/18 10:35:20 Desc 

 Loan Mod Page 8 of 11
Case 17-13753-KHK Doc 23-1 Filed 01/17/18 Entered 01/17/18 10:35:20 Desc 

 Loan Mod Page 9 of 11
Case 17-13753-KHK Doc 23-1 Filed 01/17/18 Entered 01/17/18 10:35:20 Desc 

 Loan Mod Page 10 of 11
Case 17-13753-KHK Doc 23-1 Filed 01/17/18 Entered 01/17/18 10:35:20 Desc 

 Loan Mod Page 11 of 11
(No. 74-CC-62

#### Steve Farantzos, D.D.S., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 1, 1973.*

Dr. Steve Farantzos, D.D.S., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### David M. LYONS-BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Raymond TOOMBS; G. Ball; W.O. Smith, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-1409.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 7, 2002.

Before SUHRHEINRICH and GILMAN, Circuit Judges; and HOOD, District Judge.*

The Honorable Joseph M. Hood, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.

*208
      *ORDER*

David M. Lyons-Bey, a pro se Michigan prisoner, appeals a district court order denying him a free copy of his court record. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

In 1997, Lyons-Bey filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The action was dismissed by the district court and affirmed by this court on June 30, 2000. A subsequent request for mandamus relief was also denied on September 18, 2000. Lyons-Bey then filed a request to have the court replace his copy of the record at government expense. The district court denied the request. It is from this order that Lyons-Bey appeals.

Lyons-Bey argues that the district court abused its discretion in denying him a copy of his case file. He contends that without his records, he is being denied access to the courts and is unable to prosecute his case.

To establish a claim for denial of access to the courts, Lyons-Bey must establish actual prejudice to the litigation. *See Lewis v. Casey,*518 U.S. 343, 351-52, 116 S.Ct. 2174, 135 L.Ed.2d 606 (1996); *Hadix v. Johnson,*182 F.3d 400, 404-06 (6th Cir. 1999); *Pilgrim v. Littlefield,*92 F.3d 413, 416 (6th Cir.1996). As the district court noted, Lyons-Bey’s case had been dismissed and affirmed on appeal. Further, the time to seek review before the United States Supreme Court has expired. Therefore, Lyons-Bey’s case is finished, and no further avenue of relief is available. The argument is without merit.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Rule 34(j)(2)(C), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Bankruptcy Case No.

Adversary Proceeding No. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, , certify that I am, and at all times during the service of process was, not less than 

(name) 

18 years of age and not a party to the matter concerning which service of process was made. I further certify that the service of 

this subpoena to appear and testify was made by: 

 (date) 

__ Mail service: Regular, first class United States mail, postage fully pre-paid, addressed to: 

__ Personal Service: By leaving the process with defendant or with an officer or agent of defendant at: 

__ Residence Service: By leaving the process with the following adult at: 

__ Certified Mail Service on an Insured Depository Institution: By sending the process by certified mail addressed to the 

following officer of the defendant at: 

__ Publication: The defendant was served as follows: [Describe briefly] 

__ State Law: The defendant was served pursuant to the laws of the State of , 

as follows: [Describe briefly] (name of state) 

Under penalty of perjury, I declare that the foregoing is true and correct. 

___________________________________ __________________________________________ 

Date Signature 

Jdkfljj 

Print Name 

_________________________________________________________________________

Business Address 

_________________________________________________________________________ 

City State Zip 

[ver. 05/02] 

Case 18-34024-KRH Doc 95 Filed 08/26/22 Entered 08/26/22 11:20:37 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

      Certification of the Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Markland Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the nine months ended March 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Del Kintner, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Delmar R. Kintner
-----------------------------------------------
Delmar R. Kintner
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 20, 2003
EXHIBIT 2.5

Letter Regarding Termination of Acquisition Agreement

June 16, 2006

Via Facsimile and Overnight Delivery

Raser Technologies, Inc.

5152 North Edgewood Drive

Suite 375

Provo, UT 84604

Fax (801) 473-3314

Attention: Jonathan T. Reid



| | Re: | Termination of Acquisition Agreement
| | --- | ------------------------------------

Dear Mr. Reid:

We have received Rasers most recent proposal. Please be advised that Amp Resources has reviewed this proposal and
rejects it in its entirety.

As you know, a condition to the closing of the Agreement and Plan of Acquisition, dated as of January 19, 2006 by and
among Raser Technologies, Inc. (Raser), Amp Resources, LLC (Amp) and the other parties thereto, as amended by that certain Letter Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2006 by and among the same parties (as amended, the
Acquisition Agreement), was that Raser was to have obtained funding from one or more third parties in an amount sufficient to consummate the Redemption, as such term is defined in the Acquisition Agreement (such condition, the
Financing Condition). As you also know, the drop dead date under the Acquisition Agreement was originally April 23, 2006, but was extended to June 15, 2006 pursuant to the terms of the aforementioned Letter
Agreement when Raser was unable to meet the Financing Condition on the original drop dead date. As of today, Raser remains unable to satisfy the Financing Condition.

Therefore, as authorized by the Amp Board of Managers, Amp is hereby exercising its right to terminate the Acquisition Agreement pursuant to Section 8.1(b) thereof.

Please contact us at your convenience if you believe there may be alternative transactions that we may be interested in pursuing.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Very truly yours, 
|                  
|Amp Resources, LLC
|                   | 
|By:                |  | /s/ Kevin Calderwood   
|                   |  | Kevin Calderwood       
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer



|cc: | Robert G. OConnor, Esq.
|--- | ------------------------
#### In the Matter of New York Taxicab Company.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
### **CHAPTER 73—OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE**

Sec.
1501.
Assault on process server.
1502.
Resistance to extradition agent.
1503.
Influencing or injuring officer or juror generally.
1504.
Influencing juror by writing.
1505.
Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees.
1506.
Theft or alteration of record or process; false bail.
1507.
Picketing or parading.
1508.
Recording, listening to, or observing proceedings of grand or petit juries while deliberating or voting.
1509.
Obstruction of court orders.
1510.
Obstruction of criminal investigations.
1511.
Obstruction of State or local law enforcement.
1512.
Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant.
1513.
Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant.
1514.
Civil action to restrain harassment of a victim or witness.
1514A.
Civil action to protect against retaliation in fraud cases.
1515.
Definitions for certain provisions; general provision.
1516.
Obstruction of Federal audit.
1517.
Obstructing examination of financial institution.
1518.
Obstruction of criminal investigations of health care offenses.
1519.
Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy.
1520.
Destruction of corporate audit records.
1521.
Retaliating against a Federal judge or Federal law enforcement officer by false claim or slander of title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2008**—Pub. L. 110–177, title II, §201(b), Jan. 7, 2008, 121 Stat. 2536, added item 1521.

**2002**—Pub. L. 107–204, title VIII, §§802(b), 806(b), July 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 801, 804, added items 1514A, 1519, and 1520.

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–191, title II, §245(b), Aug. 21, 1996, 110 Stat. 2018, added item 1518.

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–647, title XXV, §2503(b), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4861, added item 1517.

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §§7030, 7078(b), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4398, 4406, inserted "; general provision" in item 1515 and added item 1516.

**1982**—Pub. L. 97–291, §4(b), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1253, substituted "or juror" for ", juror or witness" after "officer" in item 1503, and added items 1512, 1513, 1514, and 1515.

**1970**—Pub. L. 91–452, title VIII, §802(b), Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 937, added item 1511.

**1967**—Pub. L. 90–123, §1(b), Nov. 3, 1967, 81 Stat. 362, added item 1510.

**1962**—Pub. L. 87–664, §6(b), Sept. 19, 1962, 76 Stat. 552, substituted "Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees" for "Influencing or injuring witness before agencies and committees" in item 1505.

**1960**—Pub. L. 86–449, title I, §102, May 6, 1960, 74 Stat. 86, added item 1509.

**1956**—Act Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 879, §2, 70 Stat. 936, added item 1508.

**1950**—Act Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1024, title I, §31(b), 64 Stat. 1019, added item 1507.
# Official Journal L 334I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 334I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6313 October 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 334I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6313 October 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1473 of 13 October 2020 amending for the 317th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1473 of 13 October 2020 amending for the 317th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
§ 222.112 What procedures are followed after the hearing? ( a ) Each party may submit to the hearing examiner additional evidence that is relevant to the issues raised at the hearing, within the time period and in the manner specified by the hearing examiner.
( b ) Within 30 days after the hearing, the hearing examiner— ( 1 ) Makes, on the basis of the record, written findings of fact and recommendations concerning any appropriate remedial action that should be taken;
( 2 ) Submits those findings and recommendations, along with the hearing record, to the Assistant Secretary; and
( 3 ) Sends a copy of those findings and recommendations to each party.
( c ) ( 1 ) Each party may file with the Assistant Secretary comments on the hearing examiner's findings and recommendations.
( 2 ) The comments must be received by the Assistant Secretary within 10 days after the party receives a copy of the hearing examiner's findings and recommendations.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7704(e))