alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 32.6 Request for a pre-offset hearing. ( a ) Except for an employee who has requested a waiver of collection of the debt under § 32.4(b), an employee who wishes a pre-offset hearing must request the hearing within 15 days of receipt of the written notice given under § 32.3. The Secretary waives the 15-day requirement if the employee shows that the delay was because of circumstances beyond his or her control or because of failure to receive notice and lack of knowledge of the time limit.
( b ) An employee who has requested a waiver under § 32.4(b) may request a hearing within 10 days of receipt of a determination by the Secretary denying a waiver.
( c ) The request for a hearing must: ( 1 ) Be in writing;
( 2 ) State why the employee: ( i ) Contests the existence or amount of the overpayment; or
( ii ) Claims that the involuntary repayment schedule will cause extreme financial hardship;
( 3 ) Include all documents on which the employee is relying, other than those provided by the Secretary under § 32.3; any document which is a statement of an individual must be in the form of an affidavit; and
( 4 ) Be submitted to the designated hearing official with a copy to the Secretary.
( d ) If the employee timely requests a pre-offset hearing or the timelines are waived under paragraph (a) of this section, the Secretary: ( 1 ) Notifies the employee whether the employee may elect an oral hearing; and
( 2 ) Provides the hearing official with a copy of all records on which the determination of the overpayment and any involuntary repayment schedule are based.
( e ) An employee who has been given the opportunity to elect an oral hearing and who does elect an oral hearing must notify the hearing official and the Secretary of his or her election in writing within 7 days of receipt of the notice under paragraph (d)(1) of this section and must identify all proposed witnesses and all facts and evidence about which they will testify.
( f ) Where an employee requests an oral hearing, the hearing official notifies the Secretary and the employee of the date, time, and location of the hearing. However: ( 1 ) The employee subsequently may elect to have the hearing based only on the written submissions by notifying the hearing official and the Secretary at least 3 calendar days before the date of the oral hearing. The hearing official may waive the 3-day requirement for good cause when the employee notifies the hearing official before the date of the hearing; and
( 2 ) The request for a hearing of an employee who fails to appear at the oral hearing must be dismissed and the Secretary's decision affirmed.
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5514; 31 U.S.C. 3716)
### §703. Effective date of actions in Copyright Office

In any case in which time limits are prescribed under this title for the performance of an action in the Copyright Office, and in which the last day of the prescribed period falls on a Saturday, Sunday, holiday, or other nonbusiness day within the District of Columbia or the Federal Government, the action may be taken on the next succeeding business day, and is effective as of the date when the period expired.

(Pub. L. 94–553, title I, §101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2591.)
### §973o. Disposition of fees, penalties, forfeitures, and other moneys

To the extent required by Article 4 of the Treaty, an amount equivalent to the total value of any fine, penalty, or other amount collected as a result of any action, judicial or otherwise, taken pursuant to sections 973e and 973f of this title shall be paid by the United States through the Secretary of State to the Administrator as soon as reasonably possible following the date that such amount is collected.

(Pub. L. 100–330, §17, June 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 600.)
#### Dorothy E. Parker, Respondent, v. Lawrence W. Parker, Appellant.

All concur.
§ 94.112 Types of eligible organizations and organizational capacity. ( a ) *Eligible programs.* Eligible programs are not limited to entities whose sole purpose is to provide direct services. There are special considerations for certain types of entities, as described below: ( 1 ) *Faith-based and neighborhood programs.* SAAs may award VOCA funds to otherwise eligible faith-based and neighborhood programs, but in making such awards, SAAs shall ensure that such programs comply with all applicable federal law, including, but not limited to, part 38 of this chapter.
( 2 ) *Crime victim compensation programs.* SAAs may provide VOCA victim assistance funding to compensation programs only for the purpose of providing direct services that extend beyond the essential duties of the staff administering the compensation program, which services may include, but are not limited to, crisis intervention; counseling; and providing information, referrals, and follow-up for crime victims.
( 3 ) *Victim service organizations located in an adjacent State.* SAAs may award VOCA funds to otherwise eligible programs that are physically located in an adjacent State, but in making such awards, the SAA shall provide notice of such award to the SAA of the adjacent State, and coordinate, as appropriate, to ensure effective provision of services, monitoring, auditing of federal funds, compliance, and reporting.
( 4 ) *Direct service programs run by the SAA.* SAAs may fund their own direct services programs, but, under § 94.104(f), may allocate no more than ten percent of the VOCA grant to such programs, and each such program shall adhere to the allowable/unallowable cost rules for sub-recipient projects set out in this subpart at §§ 94.119 through 94.122.
( b ) *Organizational capacity of the program.* For purposes of VOCA, at 34 U.S.C. 20103(b)(1)(B), the following shall apply: ( 1 ) *Record of effective services to victims of crime and support from sources other than the Crime Victims Fund.* A program has demonstrated a record of effective direct services and support from sources other than the Crime Victims Fund when, for example, it demonstrates the support and approval of its direct services by the community, its history of providing direct services in a cost-effective manner, and the breadth or depth of its financial support from sources other than the Crime Victims Fund.
( 2 ) *Substantial financial support from sources other than the Crime Victims Fund.* A program has substantial financial support from sources other than the Crime Victims Fund when at least twenty-five percent of the program's funding in the year of, or the year preceding the award comes from such sources, which may include other federal funding programs. If the funding is non-federal (or meets the DOJ Grants Financial Guide exceptions for using federal funding for match), then a program may count the used funding to demonstrate non-VOCA substantial financial support toward its project match requirement.
[81 FR 44528, July 8, 2016, as amended at 88 FR 3657, Jan. 20, 2023]
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EarthLink, Inc.(the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, KevinM. Dotts, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

 

(1)   the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ KEVIN M. DOTTS       |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |   |
| Kevin  M. Dotts          |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer |   |
| July 31,  2009      |   |

 

----
### §1324. Power of court over registration

In any action involving the protection of a design under this chapter, the court, when appropriate, may order registration of a design under this chapter or the cancellation of such a registration. Any such order shall be certified by the court to the Administrator, who shall make an appropriate entry upon the record.

(Added Pub. L. 105–304, title V, §502, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2915.)
§ 636.512 What is the basis for the source selection decision? ( a ) You must base the source selection decision on a comparative assessment of proposals against all selection criteria in the solicitation. While you may use reports and analyses prepared by others, the source selection decision shall represent your independent judgment.
( b ) The source selection decision shall be documented, and the documentation shall include the rationale for any business judgments and tradeoffs made or relied on, including benefits associated with additional costs. Although the rationale for the selection decision must be documented, that documentation need not quantify the tradeoffs that led to the decision.
This opinion is subject to administrativ e correction before final disposition.

Before HOLIFIELD , FOIL , and DEERWESTER Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Reginald R. ADAMS Corporal (E

- 4 ), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
No. 20 2100140
Decided: 22 October 2021 Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Derek A. Poteet
Senten ce adjudged 2 March 2021 by a special court

- martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton , California, con sisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment : reduction to E

- 1, confinement for 11 months and 29 days , forfeiture of $ 1,000 .00 pay per month for 12 months , and a bad

- conduct discharge. For Appellant: Commander Michael E. Maffei , JAGC, USN For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.United States v. Adams , NMCCA No. 202100140 Opinion of the Court

2 _________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________
PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to A ppellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1 T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court

1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
§ 110.24 Recipient assessment of age distinctions. ( a ) As part of a compliance review under § 110.30 or a complaint investigation under § 110.31, ED may require a recipient employing the equivalent of 15 or more full-time employees to complete a written self-evaluation, in a manner specified by ED, of any age distinction imposed in its program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance from ED to assess the recipient's compliance with the Act.
( b ) Whenever an assessment indicates a violation of the Act or these regulations, the recipient shall take corrective action.
(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6103)
<PAGE>   1

                                                             [REI -- EXHIBIT 21]

          SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
                       d/b/a RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED

     The following subsidiaries are deemed "significant subsidiaries" pursuant 
to Item 601(b)(21) of Regulation S-K:

      Reliant Energy Resources Corp., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned
subsidiary of Houston Industries Incorporated. 

      Reliant Energy International, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Houston Industries Incorporated.

----------
(1)  Pursuant to Item 601(b)(21) of Regulation SK, registrant has omitted the 
     names of subsidiaries, which considered in the aggregate as a single 
     subsidiary, would not constitute a "significant subsidiary" (as defined 
     under Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X) as of December 31, 1997

(2)  Reliant Energy Resources Corp. also conducts business under the names of 
     its three unincorporated divisions: Reliant Energy Arkla, Reliant Energy 
     Entex and Reliant Energy Minnegasco
# Official Journal C 111A/2018

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 111A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6126 March 2018 |

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 111A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6126 March 2018

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V	Announcements | |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES | |
| | Cedefop | |
| 2018/C 111 A/01 | Vacancy Notice for the Director of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) (Cedefop/2018/01/AD) | 1 |
| | | |

Notice No

Contents

page

V	Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Cedefop

2018/C 111 A/01

Vacancy Notice for the Director of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) (Cedefop/2018/01/AD)

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
### §5955. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 105–391, title IV, §406, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3510, related to reasonableness of rates. See section 101916 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of William Seaburg, Respondent, against Nick Brothers et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan and Schenck, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., taking no part.
SPECIMEN INFORMATIONAL STATEMENT
                  PURSUANT TO NEVADA REVISED STATUES ss. 78.235




Name
Address

Dear __________:

         This information statement certifies that __________________________ is
the  registered  holder  of  ______________ shares  of  common  stock  of  CADDO
ENTERPRISES,  INC.,  a  Nevada  corporation,  transferable  on  the books of the
corporation  in person or by  execution  of a power of attorney.

         Witness  the seal of the  corporation  and the  signatures  of its duly
authorized officers:

Dated: ________________

CADDO ENTERPRISES, INC.

By: ___________________                                   [SEAL]
    Dev Randhawa, President

By: ___________________
    Bob Hemmerling, Secretary
### §460xx. Establishment

#### (a) In general

In order to protect the riparian area and the aquatic, wildlife, archeological, paleontological, scientific, cultural, educational, and recreational resources of the public lands surrounding the San Pedro River in Cochise County, Arizona, there is hereby established the San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area (hereafter in this subchapter referred to as the "conservation area").

#### (b) Area included

The conservation area shall consist of public lands as generally depicted on a map entitled "San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area—Proposed" numbered AZ–040–OZ, dated January 1988, and consisting of approximately 56,431 acres.

#### (c) Map

As soon as is practicable after November 18, 1988, a map and legal description of the conservation area shall be filed by the Secretary of the Interior (hereafter in this subchapter referred to as the "Secretary") with the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the United States Senate. Each such map shall have the same force and effect as if included in this subchapter. Such map shall be on file and available for public inspection in the Office of the Director of the Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior, and in the Bureau of Land Management offices of the State Director for Arizona, and the district office responsible for the management of the conservation area.

(Pub. L. 100–696, title I, §101, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4571.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the House of Representatives changed to Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives on Jan. 5, 1993, by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Third Congress.

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 100–696, §1, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4571, provided: "That this Act [enacting this section, sections 460xx–1 to 460xx–6, 460yy, 460yy–1, 460zz to 460zz–11 of this title, sections 2081 to 2086, 2101 to 2106, 2121, and 2122 of Title 2, The Congress, and section 640d–31 of Title 25, Indians, amending sections 2101, 2102, and 2106 of Title 2 and section 640d–11 of Title 25, and enacting provisions set out as notes under section 431 of this title and section 2101 of Title 2] be cited as the 'Arizona-Idaho Conservation Act of 1988'."
Exhibit
        32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Q Comm International, Inc.
        (the " Company ")
        on
        Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission (" SEC ")
        on the
        date hereof (the " Report "),
        I,
        Mark W. Robinson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to
        18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will
        be
        retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
        request.
 
 
 /s/
        Mark W.
        Robinson
 Mark
        W.
        Robinson
 Chief
        Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
 (Principal
        Accounting Officer)
 
 August
        14, 2006
§ 21.33 Allowable fees and expenses. ( a ) A prevailing party may apply for an award of fees and other expenses incurred by the party in connection with— ( 1 ) An adversary adjudication; or
( 2 ) A significant and discrete substantive portion of an adversary adjudication.
( b ) If a proceeding includes issues covered by the Act and issues excluded from coverage, the applicant may apply only for an award of fees and other expenses related to covered issues.
( c ) Allowable fees and expenses include the following, as applicable: ( 1 ) An award of fees based on rates customarily charged by attorneys, agents, and expert witnesses.
( 2 ) An award for the reasonable expenses of the attorney, agent, or expert witness as a separate item if the attorney, agent, or expert witness ordinarily charges clients separately for those expenses.
( 3 ) The cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, or project related to the preparation of the applicant's case in the adversary adjudication.
( d ) The calculation of fees and expenses as provided for under paragraph (c) of this section shall be in accordance with the standards for awards as described in § 21.50(a) through (c).
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 504(a)(1), (b)(1)(A) and (c)(1))
**Exhibit (32.1)****Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**     For the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Timothy J. Hearn, the chief executive officer ofImperial Oil Limited (the “company”), hereby certifies that to his knowledge:(i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the company for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the company.Date: February 27, 2007   /s/ T.J. Hearn   Timothy J. Hearn  Chairman of the Board, President and  Chief Executive Officer
United States Department of Agriculture USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Dig In! • Grades 5-6 • http://teamnutrition.usda.gov

81

Name: ____________________________________________ Date: _______________

Connect with another class in your chosen area and make a friend by sharing what you both like to eat. Tell your “pen pal” 

about the fruits and vegetables you eat at home, at school, and at holidays. Ask them to share their favorite fruits and 

vegetables and how they prepare them. Swap pictures of your school gardens or your school lunches. What else would you 

like to learn about their eating habits, their school, or their culture?

Ask Your Pen Pal:

• What is your favorite fruit or vegetable, and why?

• Can you describe any special ways a fruit or vegetable is prepared where you live?

• What fruits and vegetables does your school serve for lunch? 

• Do you ever eat chickpeas (garbanzo beans) or other beans? How does your family make these?

• What is your favorite recipe? Would you like to trade recipes?

• Does your school or family have a garden? What’s growing in it? 

Garden Pen Pals LESSON 6 HANDOUT 2

____________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________

 

 ____________________________________________________________

 ____________________________________________________________

 ____________________________________________________________

 _____________________________________________________________

 _____________________________________________________________

 _____________________________________________________________

 _____________________________________________________________

 ______________________________________________________________

 ______________________________________________________________

 ______________________________________________________________

 ______________________________________________________________

Dear
#### § 234.4 International airports for entry of aliens.

International airports for the entry of aliens shall be those airports designated as such by the Commissioner. An application for designation of an airport as an international airport for the entry of aliens shall be made to the Commissioner and shall state whether the airport: (a) Has been approved by the Secretary of Commerce as a properly equipped airport, (b) has been designated by the Secretary of the Treasury as a port of entry for aircraft arriving in the United States from any place outside thereof and for the merchandise carried thereon, and (c) has been designated by the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare as a place for quarantine inspection. An airport shall not be so designated by the Commissioner without such prior approval and designation, and unless it appears to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that conditions render such designation necessary or advisable, and unless adequate facilities have been or will be provided at such airport without cost to the Federal Government for the proper inspection and disposition of aliens, including office space and such temporary detention quarters as may be found necessary. The designation of an airport as an international airport for the entry of aliens may be withdrawn whenever, in the judgment of the Commissioner, there appears just cause for such action.

[22 FR 9795, Dec. 6, 1957]