- About NRC           - The Commission
      - Statutory Authority
      - Strategic Plan
      - Budget &  Performance
      - Organization & Functions
      - Locations
      - History
      - Values
      - Policymaking
      - Radiation Protection
      - Fire Protection
      - How We Regulate
      - Grants
      - Civil Rights
      -     
    - NuclearReactors           - Operating Reactor Locations
      - Reactor Quick Links
      - Power Reactors
      - Research and Test Reactors
      - Operating Reactors
      - Operator Licensing
      - New Reactors
      - Operator Licensing for New Reactors
      - Reactor Safety Research
      - Advisory Comm (ACRS)
      - Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities
      -     
    - NuclearMaterials           - Fuel Cycle Facility Locations
      - Uranium Recovery Locations
      - Materials Quick Links
      - Special Nuclear Material
      - Source Material
      - Byproduct Material
      - Med, Academic & Ind Uses
      - Source Materials Facilities
      - Uranium Recovery
      - Fuel Cycle Facilities
      - Materials Transportation
      - Materials Research
      - Advisory Comm (ACMUI)
      - Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities
      - Materials Environmental Reviews
      -     
    - RadioactiveWaste           - Waste Quick Links
      - Low-Level Waste
      - Waste Incidental to Reprocessing
      - Incidental Waste Criteria
      - High-Level Waste
      - Uranium Mill Tailings
      - LLW Disposal
      - HLW Disposal
      - Spent Fuel Storage
      - Spent Fuel Transport
      - Waste Research
      -     
    - NuclearSecurity           - Security Spotlight
      - NRC Responsibilities
      - Domestic Safeguards
      - Radioactive Material Security
      - Facility Protection
      - Nuclear Material Control
      - International Safeguards
      - Information Security
      - Emergency Preparedness
      - &;   
    - Public Meetings& Involvement           - Public Meeting Schedule
      - Commission	    Schedule
      - Conferences & Symposia
      - Documents for Comment
      - Brochures & Fact Sheets
      - Involving Stakeholders
      - Info Quality Guidelines
      - Rulemaking Process
      - Licensing
      - Enforcement
      - Hearing Process
      - Hearing Applications
      -     

**UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONOFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001**

December 10, 1998

*Some links on this  page are to documents in  our Agencywide Documents Access and  Management System (ADAMS). For additional information, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other  Tools.*

**Addressees**

All holders of operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, except those that have permanently ceased operations and havecertified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor.

**Purpose**

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to inform addressees that for thoselicensees that intend to implement a risk-informed inservice inspection (RI-ISI) program for piping and do not have a pilotplant application currently being reviewed by the staff, the staff will consider authorizing a delay of up to 2 years inimplementing the next 10-year ISI program for piping only in order for the licensee to develop and obtain approval for theRI-ISI program for piping.

It is expected that recipients will review this information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, asappropriate. However, suggestions contained in this information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specificaction or written response is required.

**Description of Circumstances**

On August 16, 1995, the NRC published a policy statement (60 FR 42622) on the use of probabilistic risk assessment(PRA) methods in nuclear regulatory activities. In the statement, the Commission stated its belief that the use of PRAtechnology in NRC regulatory activities should be increased to the extent supported by the state of the art in PRA methodsand data and in a manner that complements the NRC's deterministic approach. To implement this policy, the staffdeveloped a PRA implementation plan, together with a timetable for developing regulatory guides (RGs) and standardreview plans (SRPs), which describes an acceptable approach for assessing the nature and impact of changes byconsidering engineering issues and applying risk insights. A part of this effort involves developing an RG and thecorresponding SRP to provide guidance to power reactor licensees and the NRC staff on an acceptable approach forutilizing risk information to support requests for changes in the plant's ISI program for piping. The draft documents wereavailable for public comment through January 13, 1998, and the staff revised the draft documents to incorporate publiccomments. The RG and the SRP were issued for trial use on October 13, 1998.

The nuclear industry has submitted two topical reports describing methodologies for implementing RI-ISI. Onemethodology has been jointly developed by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and the WestinghouseOwners Group (WOG). The other methodology is being sponsored by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI).

In addition, ASME is working on three ASME Code cases for alternate examination requirements to ASME Section XI,Division 1, for piping welds. ASME Code Case N-577 is based on the WOG methodology and ASME Code Case N-578 isbased on the EPRI methodology. ASME Code Case N-560 is based on the EPRI methodology for Class 1 B-J welds and isbeing revised to encompass both methodologies.

The NRC has encouraged licensees to submit pilot plant applications for demonstrating risk-informed methodologies to beused for piping segment and piping structural element selection in systems scheduled for ISI. The NRC has completed itsreview of the pilot plant submittal for Vermont Yankee and is currently reviewing the submittals for Surry Unit 1 andArkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2, focusing on the licensees' characterization of the proposed changes, includingidentification of the particular piping systems and welds that are affected by the changes, the performance of engineeringevaluations, the performance of PRAs to provide risk insight to support the selection of welds for inspection, theperformance of traditional engineering analyses to verify that the proposed changes do not compromise the existingregulations and the licensing basis of the plant, the development of implementation and monitoring programs to ensure thatthe reliability of piping can be maintained, and the documentation of the analyses for NRC's review and approval. The staffwill use the alternative provision of 10 CFR 50.55a (a)(3)(I) to approve technically acceptable pilot plant applications.

**Discussion**

For non-pilot plant licensees that intend to implement RI-ISI beginning with their next 10-year interval, the staff willconsider authorizing a delay of up to 2 years in the implementation of the next 10-year ISI program for piping only to allowlicensees to develop and obtain approval for their RI-ISI program at the next available opportunity using the staff-approvedtopical reports. For those licensees that are authorized such a delay, the approved RI-ISI program would have to becompleted within the remaining part of the 10-year interval, for example, programs would be shortened to 8 years for a 2-year delay. The duration of the delay needed may vary according to individual cases. Therefore, the request for delay mustprovide adequate justification, along with a clear indication of the inspection that will continue before the implementationof the RI-ISI program. During the delay period, licensees would be required to continue augmented inspection programs,such as inspections for intergranular stress-corrosion cracking and erosion-corrosion, inspections required for flawsdispositioned by analysis, system pressure tests, and inspection of components other than piping.

The staff plans to perform in-depth reviews of pilot plant submittals during 1998 and 1999 to ensure that the Rl-ISIprograms are consistent with the staff RG and SRP. For RI-ISI programs submitted after the approval of the pilot plantprograms and topical reports, but before the endorsement of ASME Code cases, it is expected that licensees will utilize theapproved WOG or EPRI topical report as guidance for developing RI-ISI programs. The review and approval process isexpected to be minimal when the submittal follows the guidelines in the approved topical report, NRC Regulatory Guide1.178, "An Approach for Plant-Specific Risk-Informed Decisionmaking Inservice Inspection of Piping"; Standard ReviewPlan 3.9.8, "Standard Review Plan for the Review of Risk-Informed Inservice Inspection of Piping"; and the safetyevaluation reports for the applicable topical report.

It is anticipated that subsequent to the issuance of safety evaluation reports (SERs) for the pilot plants and the topicalreports, the ASME Code cases will be revised to incorporate lessons learned from pilot plants and topical report reviews.The ASME Code cases will be reviewed in accordance with RG 1.147, "Inservice Inspection Code Case Acceptability -ASME Section XI, Division 1," for possible incorporation into the ASME Code. In the long term, the staff will proceedwith rulemaking so that other licensees can voluntarily adopt risk-informed ISI programs without specific review andapproval by NRC. For the Rl-ISI programs developed after the an Rl-ISI methodology has been endorsed in RG 1.147, thestaff anticipates that the licensee will develop an Rl-ISI program using the approved ASME Code cases and will submit theprogram to NRC for information with no formal NRC approval.

If you have any questions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listed below orthe appropriate NRR project manager.

Attachment:  List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices

----