alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed, September 2, 2015.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00644

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF M .G., B.G., S.G., AND A.Z., CHILDREN , Appellant

On Appeal from the County Court at Law Washington County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CCL

- 7739



### ORDER
This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the termination of the parent

- child relationship is at issue The notice of appeal was filed July 2, 2015. Appellant has establ ished indigence or is presumed to be indigent. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(a). The reporter’s record was due within 10 days after the notice of appeal was filed. See
Tex. R . App. P. 35.1(b); 28.4(a)(1). This court granted two extensions of time to file the record, which was due August 31, 2015. The record has not been filed.Appeals in parental termination cases and child protection cases are to be

brought to final dispositi on within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is
filed. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a). The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the app ellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). The trial court must d irect the court reporter to immediately commence the preparation of the reporter’s record and must arrange for a substitute reporter, if necessary. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.4(b)(1). Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely in this accelerate d appeal, we issue the following order:

We order Sheryl St app , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal on or before September 11 , 2015. If Sheryl St app does not timely file the record as ordered, the court will issue an order requiring her to appear at a hearing to show cause why the record has not been timely filed and why she should not be held in contempt of court for failing to file the record as ordered. Contempt of court is punishable by a fine and/or confinement in jail.

PER CURIAM
Compliance Outreach Program 

for Municipal Advisors

Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

230 South LaSalle Street

Chicago, IL 60604

November 3, 2014

Registration (8:30 am – 9:30 am)

Welcome and Opening Remarks (9:30 am – 9:45 am) 

Panel 1: Overview of the Final Municipal Advisor Registration Rules and the Registration 

Process (9:45 am – 10:45 am)

This panel will discuss the SEC’s final municipal advisor registration rules, including an overview 

of core aspects of the regulatory framework, selected notable exemptions from the municipal advisor 

definition, and the separate processes for registering as a municipal advisor with the SEC and 

MSRB.

Break (10:45 am – 11:00 am)

Panel 2: Fiduciary Duty and Standards of Conduct (11:00 am – Noon)

This panel will discuss a municipal advisor’s statutory fiduciary duty under Section 15B of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the proposed duties and standards of conduct for non-solicitor 

municipal advisors under the MSRB’s Rule G-42 proposal.

Lunch Break (Noon – 1:30 pm)

Panel 3: Supervisory Responsibilities and Books and Recordkeeping Obligations (1:30 pm –

2:30 pm)

This panel will discuss the proposed supervisory and compliance obligations under the MSRB’s Rule 

G-44 proposal. The panel also will discuss the specific requirements of final SEC Rule 15Ba1-8 on 

books and recordkeeping obligations, the proposed amendments to the MSRB’s Rules G-8 and G-9

on books and recordkeeping obligations for municipal advisors, and the expected format and 

production requirements for a municipal advisor’s books and records during examinations. 

Break (2:30 pm – 2:45 pm)

Panel 4: Examination Process (2:45 pm – 3:45 pm)

This panel will provide SEC and FINRA perspectives on the examination lifecycle for registrants. 

Closing Remarks (3:45 pm – 4:00 pm)
§ 222.154 How must written submissions under this subpart be filed? ( a ) All written submissions under this subpart must be filed by hand-delivery, mail, or facsimile transmission. The Secretary discourages the use of facsimile transmission for documents longer than five pages.
( b ) If agreed upon by the parties, a party may serve a document upon the other party or parties by facsimile transmission.
( c ) The filing date for a written submission under this subpart is the date the document is— ( 1 ) Hand-delivered;
( 2 ) Mailed; or
( 3 ) Sent by facsimile transmission.
( d ) A party other than the Department filing by facsimile transmission is responsible for confirming that a complete and legible copy of the document was received by the Department, including by the administrative law judge (ALJ).
( e ) Any party filing a document by facsimile transmission must file a follow-up hard copy by hand-delivery or mail within a reasonable period of time.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7711(a))
[60 FR 50778, Sept. 29, 1995, as amended at 62 FR 35419, July 1, 1997]
(No. 75-CC-1371

#### Public Electric Construction Company, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 30, 1978.*

Glen A. Schwartz, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Glen P. Larner, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Polos, C.J.

This claim arises out of a contract to install electronic surveillance systems at the Pontiac and State-ville Correctional Institutions. The original contract specified that prior to the installations of the equipment by Claimant, workers employed by the Department of Corrections were to complete certain preliminary installations of electrical wiring and parts in preparation for the work to be done by Claimant. Claimant’s bid for the project was thus based upon the assumption that Respondent would complete its part of the project within a certain time, in a certain manner and with certain parts and equipment.

Contrary to the terms of the contract, Respondent failed to make the preliminary installations, but, nevertheless, requested that Claimant install the equipment. Claimant was able to, and in fact did, install the equipment, but since the preliminary wiring was not installed, the equipment could not be connected to *589power sources in order to become operable. This situation made it necessary for Claimant to make a second trip to the institutions, after Respondent installed the wiring, to connect and activate the system. This required additional time and expense not contemplated by the parties originally.

Claimant was confronted with an additional, and unforseen, problem in that the electrical wiring and parts installed by Respondent were not the same as agreed to between the parties. Claimant was thus forced to obtain connecting parts different from those originally thought to be suitable to complete the project, and had to expend additional time and labor to adapt the equipment to Respondent’s unexpected choice of material and method of installation.

Both parties stipulated to the facts above and that the additional costs incurred by Claimant were due solely to Respondent’s actions. The joint stipulation states further that Claimant had to spend an additional $6,800.00 to complete its performance due to the delay and change of material.

This Court has previously held that actual expenses for delay occasioned by change of plans made by the State are recoverable. *Divane Brothers Electric Co. v. State, 22 Ill.Ct.Cl. 546, Meyer Machine, Inc. v. State, 27 Ill.Ct.Cl. 72.*From the above stipulated facts, it appears that Respondent made changes in plans relating to the timing of the project, choice of materials and method of installation, which caused Claimant additional expense.

Claimant is hereby awarded the sum of $6,800.00.
§ 300.519 Surrogate parents. ( a ) *General.* Each public agency must ensure that the rights of a child are protected when— ( 1 ) No parent (as defined in § 300.30) can be identified;
( 2 ) The public agency, after reasonable efforts, cannot locate a parent;
( 3 ) The child is a ward of the State under the laws of that State; or
( 4 ) The child is an unaccompanied homeless youth as defined in section 725(6) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11434a(6)).
( b ) *Duties of public agency.* The duties of a public agency under paragraph (a) of this section include the assignment of an individual to act as a surrogate for the parents. This must include a method— ( 1 ) For determining whether a child needs a surrogate parent; and
( 2 ) For assigning a surrogate parent to the child.
( c ) *Wards of the State.* In the case of a child who is a ward of the State, the surrogate parent alternatively may be appointed by the judge overseeing the child's case, provided that the surrogate meets the requirements in paragraphs (d)(2)(i) and (e) of this section.
( d ) *Criteria for selection of surrogate parents.* ( 1 ) The public agency may select a surrogate parent in any way permitted under State law.
( 2 ) Public agencies must ensure that a person selected as a surrogate parent— ( i ) Is not an employee of the SEA, the LEA, or any other agency that is involved in the education or care of the child;
( ii ) Has no personal or professional interest that conflicts with the interest of the child the surrogate parent represents; and
( iii ) Has knowledge and skills that ensure adequate representation of the child.
( e ) *Non-employee requirement; compensation.* A person otherwise qualified to be a surrogate parent under paragraph (d) of this section is not an employee of the agency solely because he or she is paid by the agency to serve as a surrogate parent.
( f ) *Unaccompanied homeless youth.* In the case of a child who is an unaccompanied homeless youth, appropriate staff of emergency shelters, transitional shelters, independent living programs, and street outreach programs may be appointed as temporary surrogate parents without regard to paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section, until a surrogate parent can be appointed that meets all of the requirements of paragraph (d) of this section.
( g ) *Surrogate parent responsibilities.* The surrogate parent may represent the child in all matters relating to— ( 1 ) The identification, evaluation, and educational placement of the child; and
( 2 ) The provision of FAPE to the child.
( h ) *SEA responsibility.* The SEA must make reasonable efforts to ensure the assignment of a surrogate parent not more than 30 days after a public agency determines that the child needs a surrogate parent.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1415(b)(2))
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 13,331

 13,618

 12,707

 12,703

 12,360

 10,080

 9,483

 9,507

 10,684

 10,297

 10,793

 12,543

 12,555

 12,651

 13,996

 13,876

 13,621

 12,928

 11,954

 10,971

 9,689

 8,522

 8,697

 10,339

 12,058

 13,941

 14,224

 15,271

 15,219

 14,234

 12,419

 3,226

 2,586

 2,744

 3,679

 4,002

 2,274

 2,369

 2,967

 4,488

 4,363

 3,755

 3,617

 3,534

 3,591

 3,672

 4,217

 3,738

 3,031

 2,757

 3,048

 2,325

 2,110

 2,684

 3,868

 4,651

 4,636

 5,221

 4,425

 4,319

 5,104

 4,138

 7,295

 7,323

 7,566

 7,869

 7,308

 5,892

 5,845

 6,181

 7,254

 7,050

 6,676

 7,394

 7,268

 7,553

 8,341

 8,769

 8,634

 7,826

 6,797

 6,673

 5,532

 5,350

 5,741

 6,656

 7,750

 8,983

 9,127

 8,566

 9,223

 9,230

 8,265

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 13, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE RELATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH ON THE JOINT ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000048595
<NAME> STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       9,818,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              413,265,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,802,000
<PP&E>                                   2,310,538,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,772,423,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    1,313,112,000
<BONDS>                                    217,567,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       513,000
<OTHER-SE>                               1,241,231,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,772,423,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           270,768,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           137,363,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          64,872,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             50,747,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         50,747,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (3,452,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                47,295,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.97


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                    Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.
                             1111 Westchester Avenue
                             White Plains, NY 10604




March 27, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

To Securities and Exchange Commission:

Arthur Andersen LLP has represented to us that the audit of the consolidated
financial statements of Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. as of December
31, 2001 was subject to their quality control system for the U.S. accounting and
auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was
conducted in compliance with professional standards, that there was appropriate
continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel working on the audit, availability of
national office consultation, and availability of personnel at foreign
affiliates of Arthur Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.



                                                Very truly yours,

                                                /s/ Ronald C. Brown

                                                Ronald C. Brown
                                                Executive Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
#### § 341.1 Application.

An application for a certificate of citizenship by or in behalf of a person who claims to have acquired United States citizenship under section 309(c) of the Act or to have acquired or derived United States citizenship as specified in section 341 of the Act must be submitted on the form designated by USCIS with the fee specified in 8 CFR 106.2 and in accordance with the instructions on the form.

[76 FR 53804, Aug. 29, 2011, as amended at 85 FR 46929, Aug. 3, 2020]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Advisory Committee for Engineering Meeting, #1170.                    

*Date/Time:*                         April 13, 2011: 12 p.m. to 6 p.m., April 14, 2011: 8 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1235, Arlington, Virginia 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Deborah Young, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 505, Arlington, Virginia 22230.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice, recommendations and counsel on major goals and policies pertaining to engineering programs and activities.                    

*Agenda:*                         The principal focus of the meeting on both days will be to discuss emerging issues and opportunities for the Directorate for Engineering and its divisions and review Committee of Visitors Reports.                    

Dated: March 23, 2011.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2011-7175 Filed 3-25-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
EPA Meeting

Coal Refuse Fired Facilities

June 25, 2014

Research Triangle Park

Coal Refuse Fired Facilities

ARIPPA

Attendees (confirmed):

Gary Anderson, Ebensburg Power

James Carroll, Panther Creek

Scott Churbock, Northern Star Gen

Gary Merritt, Northern Star Gen

 We may have additional attendees and will notify you, once we are informed.

Agenda/Discussion

Introductions

An update as to the status of EPA’s review of Request for Reconsideration

Concerns:

Potential to trigger EPA Tailoring Rule for CO2 (GHG) emissions

If the Agency were to move forward to establish a subcategory for coal refuse relative to 

HCL emissions, 

How does EPA select the Units in the floor calculations?

Definition of coal refuse

CFB Unit ability to use SO2 surrogate

ARIPPA’s Suggested Approaches
§ 222.103 What must be included in a complaint? For purposes of this subpart, a complaint is a signed statement that includes— ( a ) An allegation that an LEA has failed to develop and implement IPPs in accordance with section 8004(a);
( b ) Information that supports the allegation;
( c ) A specific request for relief; and
( d ) A statement describing what steps the tribe has taken to resolve with the LEA the matters on which the complaint is based.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7704(e)(1))
§ 300.221 Notification of LEA or State agency in case of ineligibility. If the SEA determines that an LEA or State agency is not eligible under Part B of the Act, then the SEA must— ( a ) Notify the LEA or State agency of that determination; and
( b ) Provide the LEA or State agency with reasonable notice and an opportunity for a hearing.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1413(c))
#### § 300.22 Individualized education program.

*Individualized education program* or IEP means a written statement for a child with a disability that is developed, reviewed, and revised in accordance with §§ 300.320 through 300.324.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1401(14))
§ 106.6 Effect of other requirements and preservation of rights. ( a ) *Effect of other Federal provisions.* The obligations imposed by this part are independent of, and do not alter, obligations not to discriminate on the basis of sex imposed by Executive Order 11246, as amended; sections 704 and 855 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 292d and 298b-2); Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e *et seq.*); the Equal Pay Act (29 U.S.C. 206 and 206(d)); and any other Act of Congress or Federal regulation. (Authority: Secs. 901, 902, 905, Education Amendments of 1972, 86 Stat. 373, 374, 375; 20 U.S.C. 1681, 1682, 1685)
( b ) *Effect of State or local law or other requirements.* The obligation to comply with Title IX and this part is not obviated or alleviated by any State or local law or other requirement that conflicts with Title IX or this part.
( c ) *Effect of rules or regulations of private organizations.* The obligation to comply with this part is not obviated or alleviated by any rule or regulation of any organization, club, athletic or other league, or association which would render any applicant or student ineligible to participate or limit the eligibility or participation of any applicant or student, on the basis of sex, in any education program or activity operated by a recipient and which receives Federal financial assistance.
( d ) *Constitutional protections.* Nothing in this part requires a recipient to: ( 1 ) Restrict any rights that would otherwise be protected from government action by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution;
( 2 ) Deprive a person of any rights that would otherwise be protected from government action under the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution; or
( 3 ) Restrict any other rights guaranteed against government action by the U.S. Constitution.
( e ) *Effect of Section 444 of General Education Provisions Act (GEPA)/Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).* The obligation to comply with Title IX and this part is not obviated or alleviated by FERPA, 20 U.S.C. 1232g, or its implementing regulations, 34 CFR part 99.
( f ) *Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.* Nothing in this part may be read in derogation of any individual's rights under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e *et seq.* or any regulations promulgated thereunder.
( g ) *Exercise of rights by parents, guardians, or other authorized legal representatives.* Nothing in Title IX or this part may be read in derogation of any legal right of a parent, guardian, or other authorized legal representative to act on behalf of a complainant, respondent, or other person, subject to paragraph (e) of this section, including but not limited to making a complaint through the recipient's grievance procedures for complaints of sex discrimination.
[45 FR 30955, May 9, 1980, as amended at 65 FR 68056, Nov. 13, 2000; 85 FR 30573, 30579, May 19, 2020; 89 FR 33885, Apr. 29, 2024]