alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §460u–22. Consideration of property owner's hardship in property acquisition

In exercising his authority to acquire property under this subchapter, the Secretary shall give prompt and careful consideration to any offer made by an individual owning property within the Park to sell such property, if such individual notifies the Secretary in writing that the continued ownership of such property is causing, or would result in, undue hardship.

(Pub. L. 89–761, §22, as added Pub. L. 96–612, §1(12), Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3577; amended Pub. L. 116–6, div. E, title I, §115(a)(1)(B), Feb. 15, 2019, 133 Stat. 232.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–6 substituted "Park" for "lakeshore".
§ 300.817 Reallocation of LEA funds. ( a ) If an SEA determines that an LEA is adequately providing FAPE to all children with disabilities aged three through five years residing in the area served by the LEA with State and local funds, the SEA may reallocate any portion of the funds under section 619 of the Act that are not needed by that LEA to provide FAPE, to other LEAs in the State that are not adequately providing special education and related services to all children with disabilities aged three through five years residing in the areas served by those other LEAs. The SEA may also retain those funds for use at the State level to the extent the State has not reserved the maximum amount of funds it is permitted to reserve for State-level activities pursuant to § 300.812.
( b ) After an SEA distributes section 619 funds to an eligible LEA that is not serving any children with disabilities aged three through five years, as provided in § 300.815, the SEA must determine, within a reasonable period of time prior to the end of the carryover period in 34 CFR 76.709, whether the LEA has obligated the funds. The SEA may reallocate any of those funds not obligated by the LEA to other LEAs in the State that are not adequately providing special education and related services to all children with disabilities aged three through five years residing in the areas served by those other LEAs. The SEA may also retain those funds for use at the State level to the extent the State has not reserved the maximum amount of funds it is permitted to reserve for State-level activities pursuant to § 300.812.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1419(g)(2))
[73 FR 73028, Dec. 1, 2008]
#### § 289.1 Definition.

The term *American Indian born in Canada* as used in section 289 of the Act includes only persons possessing 50 per centum or more of the blood of the American Indian race. It does not include a person who is the spouse or child of such an Indian or a person whose membership in an Indian tribe or family is created by adoption, unless such person possesses at least 50 per centum or more of such blood.

[29 FR 11494, Aug. 11, 1964]
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Principal Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350**

**(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002)**

 

I, Stuart R. Lloyd, ChiefFinancial Officer (principal financial officer) of PEC Solutions, Inc. (the“Registrant”), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon review ofthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 of theRegistrant (the “Report”):

 

(1)     TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) [15(d)] of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| /s/ Stuart R. Lloyd |             |
|---------------------|------------------|
| Name:               | Stuart R.  Lloyd |
| Date:               | August 14,  2003 |
|                     |                  |  |

 

----
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT

I, JAMES GRAINER, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of GreenShift
Corporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-
15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and,

c.	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and,

b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.


                                    /S/  JAMES GRAINER
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    JAMES GRAINER
                                    President and Chief Financial Officer
Date:  May 19, 2006
I N THE DISTRI CT COU RT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFT H DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED C ALVA HASKELL,
P etitioner ,

v. Case No

. 5D 23 -0 898 LT Case No. 2 009

- CF

- 002359

ST AT E OF F LORIDA ,

Respondent

. ________________________________/ Opinion filed March 1 0, 2 023
Petition for Belated Appeal , A Case of Original Jurisdiction.
Ca lva Haskell , Bushnell , pro se

. Ashley Moody , Attorney General , Ta llahassee, and, Rebecca Rock McG uigan , Assistan t Attorney General, Day tona Beach, for Respondent

. PER CURIAM.
The pe tition for

b elated ap peal i s granted. A c opy of t his o pinion shall
b e filed with t he t rial court and be t reated as t he notice o f ap peal f rom the August 17, 202 2 order denying motion to correct illegal sentence filed in2 C ase No. 2009

- CF

- 002359 , Lake County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)( 6 )(D).

P ETITION GRANTED

.

J AY , HARRIS and BOATWRIGHT , JJ., concu r.
EXHIBIT 23
                                                               
                                                               
                                                               
    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
    
    
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in
    Registration Statement Nos. 33-51215, and 333-00139 of
    Idaho Power Company on Form S-3 and Registration Statement
    No. 33-56071 of Idaho Power Company on Form S-8 of our
    report dated January 30, 1998 appearing in the Annual
    Report on Form 10-K of Idaho Power Company for the year
    ended December 31, 1997.
    
    
    
    
    
    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
    
    Portland, Oregon
    March 13, 1998
### §1092. Exclusive remedies

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as precluding the application of State or local laws to the conduct proscribed by this chapter, nor shall anything in this chapter be construed as creating any substantive or procedural right enforceable by law by any party in any proceeding.

(Added Pub. L. 100–606, §2(a), Nov. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 3046.)
Company Filings

Skip to Main Content
              -  About                  - Careers
                - Commissioners
                - Contact
                - Reports and Publications
                - Securities Laws
                - Mission 
              -  Divisions & Offices                  - Corporation Finance
                - Enforcement
                - Investment Management
                - Economic and Risk Analysis
                - Trading and Markets
                - Examinations
                - Office of Administrative Law Judges
                - Regional Offices
                - All Divisions and Offices 
              -  Enforcement                  - Litigation Releases
                - Administrative Proceedings
                - Opinions and Adjudicatory Orders
                - Accounting and Auditing
                - Trading Suspensions
                - How Investigations Work
                - Receiverships
                - Information for Harmed Investors 
              -  Regulation                  - Rulemaking Index
                - Proposed Rules
                - Final Rules
                - Interim Final Rules
                - Other Orders and Notices
                - Self-Regulatory Organizations
                - Staff Interpretations 
              -  Education                  - Investor.gov
                - Five Questions to Ask Before You Invest
                - About Investment Professionals
                - Check Your Investment Professional
                - Investing Tools and Calculators
                - Investment Products
                - Understanding Fees
                - Investor Alerts and Bulletins
                - Glossary 
              -  Filings                  - EDGAR Search & Access
                - Company Filing Search
                - How to Search EDGAR
                - Requesting Public Documents
                - Forms List
                - Information for Filers
                - About EDGAR 
              -  News                  - Press Releases
                - Speeches and Statements
                - Spotlight Topics
                - Upcoming Events
                - Webcasts
                - SEC in the News
                - SEC Videos
                - Media Gallery 

# Open Meeting Agenda

## Wednesday, March 22, 2017

| **Item 1:** | **Amendment to Rule 15c6-1**                                                                                                    |
|-------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Office:     | Division of Trading and Markets                                                                                                 |
| Staff:      | Heather Seidel, Gary Goldsholle, Christian Sabella, Jeffrey Mooney, Justin Pica, Susan Petersen, Andrew Shanbrom, Jesse Capelle |
||
### §460r–5. Hunting and fishing

The Secretary shall permit hunting and fishing on lands and waters under his jurisdiction within the Mount Rogers National Recreation Area in accordance with applicable Federal and State laws. The Secretary may designate zones where, and establish periods when, no hunting shall be permitted for reasons of public safety, administration, or public use and enjoyment, and shall issue regulations after consultation with the Commission of Game and Inland Fisheries of the State of Virginia.

(Pub. L. 89–438, §6, May, 31, 1966, 80 Stat. 191.)
### §430j. Monocacy National Battlefield; establishment

That in order to commemorate the Battle of Monocacy, Maryland, and to preserve for historical purposes the breastworks, earthworks, walls, or other defenses or shelters used by the armies therein, the battlefield at Monocacy in the State of Maryland is hereby established as the Monocacy National Battlefield. The battlefield shall comprise the area within the boundary generally depicted on the map entitled "Monocacy National Battlefield," numbered 894/40,001A, and dated April 1980, which shall be on file and available for public inspection in the Office of the National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

(June 21, 1934, ch. 694, §1, 48 Stat. 1198; Pub. L. 94–578, title III, §319(1), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2738; Pub. L. 96–607, title XIV, §140(a), Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3546.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–607 substituted provision directing that the battlefield be comprised of the area within the boundary generally depicted on the map entitled Monocacy National Battlefield, numbered 894/40,001A, dated April 1980, which map is to be on file and available for public inspection for provision directing that the battlefield be comprised of the area generally depicted on the drawing entitled Boundary, Monocacy National Battlefield, numbered 894–40,000, dated May 1976.

1976—Pub. L. 94–578 substituted "is declared a national battlefield to be known as the 'Monocacy National Battlefield' (hereinafter referred to as 'the battlefield'). The battlefield shall comprise the area generally depicted on the drawing entitled 'Boundary, Monocacy National Battlefield', numbered 894–40,000 and dated May 1976" for "is declared a national military park to be known as the 'Monocacy National Military Park', whenever the title to the lands deemed necessary by the Secretary of the Interior shall have been acquired by the United States and the usual jurisdiction over the lands and roads of the same shall have been granted to the United States by the State of Maryland".
### §758e–1a. Cooperative program for development of tuna and other latent fishery resources in area; establishment; availability of project information

In addition to the authority granted in section 758e of this title, the Secretary, in consultation with representatives of all interested member nations of the agency, and those parties set forth in section 758e–1 of this title, may establish in accordance with section 758e of this title, a cooperative program for the development of tuna and other latent fisheries resources of the Central, Western, and South Pacific Ocean to be submitted to the President and the Congress within one year following official formation of the agency. The Secretary shall make available to all interested member nations of the agency the results and findings of research or development projects carried out under sections 758e to 758e–5 of this title.

(Pub. L. 92–444, §4, as added Pub. L. 95–295, §1(3), June 16, 1978, 92 Stat. 319.)
#### Jessie S. Dick, Appellant, v. Interborough Rapid Transit Company, Respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
§ 636.509 Can offerors revise their proposals as a result of discussions? ( a ) Yes, you may request or allow proposal revisions to clarify and document understandings reached during discussions. At the conclusion of discussions, each offeror shall be given an opportunity to submit a final proposal revision.
( b ) You must establish a common cut-off date only for receipt of final proposal revisions. Requests for final proposal revisions shall advise offerors that the final proposal revisions shall be in writing and that the contracting agency intends to make award without obtaining further revisions.
### §8041. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) Funding

Amounts made available to carry out this chapter shall be derived from amounts appropriated to the relevant agencies and departments.

#### (b) No increase in contributions

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to authorize an increase in required or voluntary contributions paid by the United States to any multilateral or international organization.

(Pub. L. 116–92, div. C, title XXXV, §3571, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2010.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle C of title XXXV of div. C of Pub. L. 116–92, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1997, known as the Maritime Security and Fisheries Enforcement Act and also as the Maritime SAFE Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 8001 of this title and Tables.
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

(Alexandria Division) 

In re: * 

 

WW Contractors Inc., * Case No: 18-12095-BFK 

 Debtor. * Chapter 11 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * 

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL TO DEBTOR 

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Aryeh E. Stein and Meridian Law, LLC hereby withdraw 

their appearance as counsel to the Debtor in the above-captioned case. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Aryeh E. Stein 

Aryeh E. Stein, VA Bar No. 45895 

Meridian Law, LLC 

600 Reisterstown Road 

Suite 700 

Baltimore, MD 21208 

(443) 326-6011 

astein@meridianlawfirm.com 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on this 13th day of November, 2018, a copy of the foregoing pleading 

was served electronically to those parties on the Court’s CM/ECF notice list. 

 /s/ Aryeh E. Stein 

 Aryeh E. Stein 

Case 18-12095-BFK Doc 121 Filed 11/13/18 Entered 11/13/18 15:16:21 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 95043 / June 6, 2022

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20781

In the Matter of

Baxter International Inc. ,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20782

In the Matter of

Jeffrey Schaible,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20783

In the Matter of

Scott Bohaboy,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

On May 4, 2022, the Commission issued an Omnibus Order Directing the Engagement of 

Two Tax Administrators for Appointments on a Case-By-Case Basis in Administrative 
2

Proceedings that Establish Distribution Funds (the “Omnibus Order”).1 The Omnibus Order 

engaged, Miller Kaplan Arase LLP and Heffler, Radetich & Saitta, LLP, to serve as a 

Commission tax administrator (“Tax Administrator”) for selection and appointment on an 

individual case basis, for calendar years 2022 through 2024 in administrative proceedings where 

the distribution fund may incur tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) 

under the Department of the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

The Director of the Division of Enforcement is authorized to appoint a Tax Administrator 

pursuant with the Omnibus Order.2 The Commission staff has requested the appointment of 

Miller Kaplan Arase LLP as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced 

proceedings.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the Omnibus Order, Miller Kaplan Arase 

LLP is appointed as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.3

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 94845 (May 4, 2022).

2

 See Delegation of Authority to Director of the Division of Enforcement, Securities Act Rel. No. 10900 (Dec. 10, 

2020).

3

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(ii).
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-2550

_____________________________

HOMEOWNERS CHOICE PROPERTY 

& CASUALTY INSURANCE 

COMPANY, INC.,

Petitioner,

v.

TIMOTHY B. LACEY and KAY L.

LACEY,

Respondents.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.

December 28, 2023

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

LEWIS, ROBERTS, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Patrick M. Chidnese and Frieda C. Lindroth of Bickford & 

Chidnese, LLP, Tampa, for Petitioner.

Blair Fazzio of Kanner & Pintaluga, P.A., Boca Raton, for 

Respondents.
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications.
Title: Structural dislocations in eastern Massachusetts : a  description of the major faults and mylonite zones  that form the eastern Massachusetts dislocation belt  [Report]  [Plate 1]

SuDocs No. I 19.3:1410 | Item No. 0620 | System  No. 001000484
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

 
 
 
Last updated:  September 24,  2016  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov/
  |
|--|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Summary: FWS Pilots Used FWS Hangar to Store and Maintain 

Personal Planes 

Report Date: February 13, 2020 Report Number: 19-0363 

The OIG investigated allegations that two U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) pilots parked 

their personally owned planes in an FWS hangar during the winter and maintained the planes 

using FWS tools and supplies. The complainant further alleged that a refuge manager was aware 

of complaints about the matter but failed to act. 

We confirmed the pilots used an FWS hangar to maintain their personal planes but found that 

refuge managers permitted limited personal use outside of official hours if it did not impede 

official refuge business. We did identify one civilian complaint about the use of the hangar, but 

we did not find any evidence the refuge manager was aware of it. 

We did not find any specific FWS or DOI guidance or policy that would either prohibit or allow 

personal use of Government hangars. Additionally, the practice of allowing personal use of FWS 

hangars seemed to vary from refuge to refuge. 

This is a summary of a report we provided to the FWS Director. 

Office of Investigations | Office of Inspector General | U.S. Department of the Interior | Washington, DC