alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §825r. Separability

If any provision of this chapter, or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, the remainder of the chapter, and the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby.

(June 10, 1920, ch. 285, pt. III, §320, formerly §319, as added Aug. 26, 1935, ch. 687, title II, §213, 49 Stat. 863, and renumbered §320, Pub. L. 95–617, title II, §212, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3148.)
§ 34.20 Amount to be withheld under multiple garnishment orders. If a debtor's pay is subject to several garnishment orders, the employer must comply with our garnishment order as follows: ( a ) Unless other Federal law requires a different priority, the employer must pay us the amount calculated under § 34.19(b) before the employer complies with any later garnishment orders, except a family support withholding order.
( b ) If an employer is withholding from a debtor's pay based on a garnishment order served on the employer before our order, or if a withholding order for family support is served on an employer at any time, the employer must comply with our garnishment order by withholding an amount that is the smaller of— ( 1 ) The amount calculated under § 34.19(b); or
( 2 ) An amount equal to 25 percent of the debtor's disposable pay less the amount or amounts withheld under the garnishment order or orders with priority over our order.
( c ) ( 1 ) If a debtor owes more than one debt arising from a program we administer, we may issue multiple garnishment orders.
( 2 ) The total amount withheld from the debtor's pay for orders we issue under paragraph (c)(1) of this section does not exceed the amounts specified in the orders, the amount specified in § 34.19(b)(2), or 15 percent of the debtor's disposable pay, whichever is smallest.
( d ) An employer may withhold and pay an amount greater than that amount in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section if the debtor gives the employer written consent.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3720D)
#### Albert Stenger, appellee, v. David Carrig et al., appellants.

Filed May 22, 1901.

No. 11,342.

Decree of Foreclosure: Interest. A decree foreclosing a mortgage draws interest from the date of its rendition until the same is paid.

Appeal from the district court for Platte county. Heard below before Hollenbeck, J.

*Reversed.*

*Virgil 0. Strickler,*for appellant.

*McAllister & Cornelius, contra.*

*754Nokval, C. J.

Albert Stenger brought suit in the court below to foreclose a real estate mortgage given by Davicl Carrig and wife. The Home Fire Insurance Company of Omaha intervened and set up a prior mortgage given by them on the same premises, and prayed a foreclosure thereof. A decree was entered on April 25, 1896, foreclosing both mortgages, giving the intervener a first lien for the sum of $5,557, and plaintiff a second lien for $4,091.10. An order of sale was issued, and the premises were sold to plaintiff on May 17, 1897, for $7,578. Objections to the confirmation were overruled and the sale was approved and confirmed on June 5, 1897. David Carrig, one of the mortgagors, appealed to this court, which appeal was dismissed at the January, 1899, term, and a mandate issued to the trial court on April 3, 1899. On or about June 6, 1899, Stenger paid to the clerk of the district court of the purchase price the sum of $6,320.01, of which $351.45 was applied on costs and the remainder, $5,968.56, was paid to the Home Fire Insurance Company on its decree, but which was insufficient to pay the amount of its lien, computing interest at 7 per cent from the date of the decree until the payment was made. On June 27, 1899, Stenger filed a motion in the court below for an order directing the present sheriff to execute and deliver to him a deed for the mortgaged premises, the sheriff who made the sale having gone out of office. At the same .time the intervener filed a motion for an order requiring' plaintiff to pay into court the amount of his bid, or so much thereof as would satisfy the lien of intervener, with interest thereon from the date of the decree at 7 per cent. This motion was overruled, and plaintiff’s motion was sustained. • Intervener appeals.

A single question is presented, which is, up to what time did the decree in favor of the Home Fire Insurance Company draw interest? This is answered by section 3, chapter 44, Compiled Statutes, which provides that “in*755terest on all decrees and judgments for the payment of money shall be from the date of the rendition thereof at the rate of seven dollars upon each one hundred dollars annually until the same shall be paid.” Intervener was entitled to interest on its decree until the same was paid. *Trompen v. Hammond,*61 Nebr., 446. The court below therefore erred in not requiring plaintiff to complete his purchase by paying into court a sufficient sum to pay intervener’s claim, not exceeding the amount of the bid.

Reversed.
### §709. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 3, 1918, ch. 128, §8, 40 Stat. 756, authorized taking and use of migratory birds, nests, or eggs for scientific or propagating purposes until adoption and approval, pursuant to section 704 of this title, of regulations dealing therewith. Regulations were promulgated by Proc. July 31, 1918, 40 Stat. 1812.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Ex12c
                                  IDACORP, Inc.
                       Consolidated Financial Information
Supplemental Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends Requirements



                                            Twelve Months Ended December 31,
                                                 (Thousands of Dollars)
                                         1995         1996         1997         1998        1999

<S>                                  <C>         <C>          <C>           <C>         <C>
Earnings, as defined:
  Income before  income taxes        $ 127,342   $  135,247   $  133,570    $ 133,806   $ 137,021
  Adjust for distributed income of
  equity investees                      (2,058)      (1,413)      (3,943)      (4,697)       (837)
  Equity in loss of equity method
  investments                                0            0            0          458         435
  Minority interest in losses of
  majority owned subsidiaries                0            0            0         (125)        (37)
  Supplemental fixed charges and
  preferred dividends, as below         72,826       73,018       72,208       72,496      74,800

     Total earnings, as defined      $ 198,110   $  206,852   $  201,835    $ 201,938   $ 211,382

Fixed charges, as defined:
  Interest charges                   $  56,456   $   57,348   $   60,761    $  60,677   $  62,975
  Preferred stock dividends of
  subsidiaries-gross up-IDACORP
  rate                                  12,834      12,079        7,891        8,445       8,313
  Rental interest factor                   925         991          982          801         955
     Total fixed charges                70,215      70,418       69,634       69,923      72,243
  Supplemental increment to fixed
    charges*                             2,611       2,600        2,574        2,573       2,557


  Supplemental fixed charges            72,826      73,018       72,208       72,496      74,800
  Preferred dividends requirements           0           0            0            0           0

     Total combined supplemental
     fixed charges and preferred
     dividends                       $   72,826   $  73,018   $   72,208    $  72,496   $  74,800

Supplemental ratio of earnings to
combined fixed charges and
preferred dividends                       2.72x       2.83x        2.80x        2.79x       2.83x

*Explanation of increment - Interest on the guaranty of American Falls
       Reservoir District bonds and Milner Dam, Inc. notes which are
       already included in operation expenses.



</TABLE>
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Li Liu, the Chief Executive Officer of YAYI
INTERNATIONAL INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2011 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement
this 29th day of June, 2011.

/s/ Li
Liu Li Liu Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Yayi International Inc. and will be retained by Yayi
International Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
<TABLE>
<caption >
Ex-12a

                                                           IDACORP, Inc.
                                             Consolidated Financial Information
                                       Supplemental Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
Charges


                                                             Twelve Months Ended December 31,
                                                                  (Thousands of Dollars)

                                                   1994         1995           1996         1997         1998
<S>                                              <C>          <C>            <C>          <C>          <C>
Earnings, as defined:
    Income before income taxes.................. $101,775     $127,342       $135,247     $133,570     $133,806
    Adjust for distributed income of equity
      investees.................................      326       (2,058)        (1,413)      (3,943)      (4,697)
    Equity in loss of equity method
      investments...............................        0            0              0            0          458
    Minority interest in losses of
      majority owned subs.......................        0            0              0            0         (125)
    Supplemental fixed charges, as below........   68,946       72,826         73,018       72,208       72,496

        Total earnings, as defined.............. $171,047     $198,110       $206,852     $201,835     $201,938

Fixed charges, as defined:
    Interest charges............................  $54,433      $56,456        $57,348      $60,761      $60,677
    Preferred stock dividends of subsidiaries-
      gross up-Idcrp rate.......................   11,097       12,834         12,079        7,891        8,445
    Rental interest factor......................      794          925            991          982          801

        Total fixed charges.....................   66,324       70,215         70,418       69,634       69,923

    Supplemental increment to fixed charges*....    2,622        2,611          2,600        2,574        2,573

        Total supplemental fixed charges........  $68,946      $72,826        $73,018      $72,208      $72,496
Supplemental ratio of earnings to fixed charges.     2.48x        2.72x         2.83x        2.80x        2.79x
* Explanation of increment:
    Interest on the guaranty of American Falls Reservoir District bonds
    and Milner Dam Inc. notes which are already included in operating expense.

</TABLE>
#### § 101.114 Expeditious treatment.

Requests for expeditious treatment of matters pending before the responsible Department official or the presiding officer are deemed communications on the merits, and are improper except when forwarded from parties to a proceeding and served upon all other parties thereto. Such communications should be in the form of a motion.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 8,647

 8,558

 8,648

 8,444

 9,630

 9,825

 10,626

 11,078

 10,772

 10,851

 10,399

 9,069

 9,928

 9,853

 9,451

 9,176

 8,498

 7,714

 9,598

 10,716

 11,470

 11,115

 10,738

 10,523

 10,689

 11,501

 12,069

 12,562

 12,297

 11,042

 1,948

 2,144

 2,555

 2,707

 2,980

 2,812

 2,501

 3,016

 3,534

 2,957

 2,768

 2,850

 2,087

 1,673

 1,935

 2,529

 2,722

 2,858

 2,805

 3,284

 3,748

 3,666

 2,330

 2,247

 2,473

 2,652

 3,839

 4,799

 5,969

 5,070

 5,030

 5,092

 5,352

 5,526

 5,787

 5,795

 5,714

 6,964

 7,088

 6,834

 6,492

 6,261

 5,659

 5,207

 5,273

 5,582

 5,477

 5,223

 5,568

 6,576

 6,829

 6,639

 5,832

 5,653

 5,867

 6,531

 7,541

 8,541

 8,957

 8,087

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### § 303.17 Homeless children.

*Homeless children* means children who meet the definition given the term *homeless children and youths* in section 725 (42 U.S.C. 11434a) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 11431 *et seq.*

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1401(11))
1 The petition in this case was fil ed on May 6, 1996, and is ther efore governed by

the provi sions of the 19 95 Pos t-Convic tion Proc edure A ct. See Comp iler’s Notes, T.C.A. § 40-30-201 (1997). 

# FILED

March 11, 1998 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT JA CKSON MARCH 1998 SESS ION

STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) ) Appellee, ) C. C. A. NO. 02C01-9707-CC-00266 ) vs. ) DECATUR COUNTY ) STEVEN S. NEWMAN, ) Nos. 25, 86 ) Appellant. )

O R D E R

This case represents an appeal from the dismissal of the petitioner’s petition for post-convic

tion relief. On January 5 , 1987, the petitioner pled g uilty to four counts of third degree burg lary and one count of larceny from a vending machine, and on October 24, 1988, the petitioner pled guilty to second

degree burglary and grand larceny. No appeal w

as taken from these convicti ons. On May 6, 1996, the peti tioner filed a petition for post-conv iction attacking the 1987 an d 1988 larceny convic tions; he apparently did not challe nge the burglary c onvictions. The petitioner claimed that he was not fully advi sed of his rights agains t self incrimination or that these convictions could be used to enhance subsequent convictions. Findi ng that the statute of limitations ha d expired, the tria l court dismissed the petition with out a hearing.

Pursuant to T.C.A. § 40-30-202( a) 1 , a person in custody under a sentence of a court of this state must petiti on for post-conviction r elief within one year of the date of the final action of the highest state app ellate court to which an appeal is taken or, if no appeal is taken, withi n one year of the date on whic h judgment became final. The Post-Conviction Proc

edure Act provides sev eral limited exceptions

to the one-year statute of limitations, howev er none of them are applicable to the present case. See § 40-30-202(b). The petition i n this case was filed w ell beyond the applicable statute of2 The pe tition would als o be bar red und er the pre vious thre e year statu te of limitation s. See T.C.A . § 40-30 -102 (19 90) (rep ealed); Passa rella v. State , 891 S.W .2d 619 ( Tenn . Crim. A pp.), perm . to app. denied , (Tenn. 1994). 2 limitati ons, and is, there fore, un timely. 2 Accordingly, the post-conviction court properly dismissed the petition without an evidentiary hearing. T.C.A. § 40-30-206(b). Contrary to the petitioner’s claim,the 1995 Post-Convictio n Procedure Act did not creat e a one year window in which previously barred claims could be raised. See Carter v. State , 952 S.W.2d 417 (Te nn. 1997).

For the reasons stated above, we conclude that the trial court did not err in dismissing the petitioner’s petition for post-c onviction relief. Accor

dingly, it is her

eby ORDERED that the judgment o f the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 20 , Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Enter, this the ___ day of Mar ch, 1998.

__________________________________ JOE B. JONES, PRESIDING JUDGE

__________________________________ GARY R. WADE, JUDGE

__________________________________ JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE
### **CHAPTER 35—ESCAPE AND RESCUE**

Sec.
751.
Prisoners in custody of institution or officer.
752.
Instigating or assisting escape.
753.
Rescue to prevent execution.
[754.
Repealed.]
755.
Officer permitting escape.
756.
Internee of belligerent nation.
757.
Prisoners of war or enemy aliens.
758.
High speed flight from immigration checkpoint.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–208, div. C, title I, §108(b)(2), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–558, added item 758.

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330004(5), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2141, struck out item 754 "Rescue of body of executed offender".
### §1592. Unlawful conduct with respect to documents in furtherance of trafficking, peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor

(a) Whoever knowingly destroys, conceals, removes, confiscates, or possesses any actual or purported passport or other immigration document, or any other actual or purported government identification document, of another person—

(1) in the course of a violation of section 1581, 1583, 1584, 1589, 1590, 1591, or 1594(a);

(2) with intent to violate section 1581, 1583, 1584, 1589, 1590, or 1591; or

(3) to prevent or restrict or to attempt to prevent or restrict, without lawful authority, the person's liberty to move or travel, in order to maintain the labor or services of that person, when the person is or has been a victim of a severe form of trafficking in persons, as defined in section 103 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000,

shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both.

(b) Subsection (a) does not apply to the conduct of a person who is or has been a victim of a severe form of trafficking in persons, as defined in section 103 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000, if that conduct is caused by, or incident to, that trafficking.

(c) Whoever obstructs, attempts to obstruct, or in any way interferes with or prevents the enforcement of this section, shall be subject to the penalties described in subsection (a).

(Added Pub. L. 106–386, div. A, §112(a)(2), Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1488; amended Pub. L. 110–457, title II, §222(b)(6), Dec. 23, 2008, 122 Stat. 5070.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 103 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000, referred to in subsecs. (a)(3) and (b), is classified to section 7102 of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse.

#### Amendments

2008—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 110–457 added subsec. (c).
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 0514

_____________________________
R AKESH V ERMA ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

— Original Jurisdiction

.

March 11, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

. See Baker v. State , 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

W ETHERELL , O STERHAUS , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Rakesh Verma, pro se
, P etitioner

. Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
§ 300.322 Parent participation. ( a ) *Public agency responsibility—general.* Each public agency must take steps to ensure that one or both of the parents of a child with a disability are present at each IEP Team meeting or are afforded the opportunity to participate, including— ( 1 ) Notifying parents of the meeting early enough to ensure that they will have an opportunity to attend; and
( 2 ) Scheduling the meeting at a mutually agreed on time and place.
( b ) *Information provided to parents.* ( 1 ) The notice required under paragraph (a)(1) of this section must— ( i ) Indicate the purpose, time, and location of the meeting and who will be in attendance; and
( ii ) Inform the parents of the provisions in § 300.321(a)(6) and (c) (relating to the participation of other individuals on the IEP Team who have knowledge or special expertise about the child), and § 300.321(f) (relating to the participation of the Part C service coordinator or other representatives of the Part C system at the initial IEP Team meeting for a child previously served under Part C of the Act).
( 2 ) For a child with a disability beginning not later than the first IEP to be in effect when the child turns 16, or younger if determined appropriate by the IEP Team, the notice also must— ( i ) Indicate— ( A ) That a purpose of the meeting will be the consideration of the postsecondary goals and transition services for the child, in accordance with § 300.320(b); and
( B ) That the agency will invite the student; and
( ii ) Identify any other agency that will be invited to send a representative.
( c ) *Other methods to ensure parent participation.* If neither parent can attend an IEP Team meeting, the public agency must use other methods to ensure parent participation, including individual or conference telephone calls, consistent with § 300.328 (related to alternative means of meeting participation).
( d ) *Conducting an IEP Team meeting without a parent in attendance.* A meeting may be conducted without a parent in attendance if the public agency is unable to convince the parents that they should attend. In this case, the public agency must keep a record of its attempts to arrange a mutually agreed on time and place, such as— ( 1 ) Detailed records of telephone calls made or attempted and the results of those calls;
( 2 ) Copies of correspondence sent to the parents and any responses received; and
( 3 ) Detailed records of visits made to the parent's home or place of employment and the results of those visits.
( e ) *Use of interpreters or other action, as appropriate.* The public agency must take whatever action is necessary to ensure that the parent understands the proceedings of the IEP Team meeting, including arranging for an interpreter for parents with deafness or whose native language is other than English.
( f ) *Parent copy of child's IEP.* The public agency must give the parent a copy of the child's IEP at no cost to the parent.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1414(d)(1)(B)(i))
### **CHAPTER 219—TRIAL BY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGES**

Sec.
3401.
Misdemeanors; application of probation laws.
3402.
Rules of procedure, practice and appeal.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1979**—Pub. L. 96–82, §7(c), Oct. 10, 1979, 93 Stat. 646, substituted "Misdemeanors" for "Minor offenses" in item 3401.

**1968**—Pub. L. 90–578, title III, §§301(c), 302(c), Oct. 17, 1968, 82 Stat. 1115, 1116, substituted "TRIAL BY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATES" for "TRIAL BY COMMISSIONERS" in chapter heading, and substituted "Minor offenses" for "Petty offenses" and struck out "fees" after "probation laws" in item 3401.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGES" substituted for "UNITED STATES MAGISTRATES" in chapter heading pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as a note under section 631 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.