Butte Draft RMP/EIS 795 

APPENDIX I – DRAFT REPORT ON WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS 

ELIGIBILITY & SUITABILITY DETERMINATIONS 

 Upper Big Hole River, Deer Lodge County, Montana 

BUTTE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN

BUTTE FIELD OFFICE, MONTANA

February 2006 

US Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management 

106 North Parkmont 

Butte, Montana 59701 
 
National Wild & Scenic River Suitability Study 

 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 797 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Page 

Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................................... 799 

Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................... 799 

What is a Wild and Scenic River? .............................................................................................................................. 799 

Steps in the Wild and Scenic Rivers Study Process ................................................................................................... 799 

Inventory Phase for the Butte RMP Revision.................................................................................................................. 804 

Identification of Eligible River Segments .................................................................................................................. 805 

Impaired Water Bodies ............................................................................................................................................... 813 

Tentative Classification .............................................................................................................................................. 813 

Final Eligibility Determinations ................................................................................................................................. 815 

Suitability Study Phase for the Butte RMP Revision ...................................................................................................... 816 

Suitability Criteria for Eligible Segments................................................................................................................... 816 

Preliminary Suitability Determination Summary ............................................................................................................ 826 

Interim Management ........................................................................................................................................................ 827 

Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................... 831 

Outstandingly Remarkable Values................................................................................................................................... 831 

Scenic.......................................................................................................................................................................... 831 

Recreational ................................................................................................................................................................ 832 

Geological................................................................................................................................................................... 832 

Fish.............................................................................................................................................................................. 832 

Wildlife ....................................................................................................................................................................... 832 

Cultural ....................................................................................................................................................................... 832 

Historic........................................................................................................................................................................ 832 

Other Similar Values .................................................................................................................................................. 833 

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Page 

1 Butte RMP Planning Area ............................................................................................................................... 801 

2 Wild and Scenic Rivers Eligibility Process Flow Chart.................................................................................. 802 

3 Planning Area Rivers Considered in Wild and Scenic Rivers Inventory Process........................................... 806 

4 Planning Area River Segments Proposed as Eligible for Further Study ......................................................... 807 

5 Upper Big Hole River ...................................................................................................................................... 809 

6 Missouri River ................................................................................................................................................. 810 

7 Moose Creek .................................................................................................................................................... 811 

8 Muskrat Creek.................................................................................................................................................. 812 

LIST OF TABLES

Table Page 

A-1 Eligible River Segments and Tentative Classification .................................................................................... 808 

B-1 Classification Criteria for Wild, Scenic, and Recreational River Areas.......................................................... 834 

C-1 Interim Protection for Candidate Wild and Scenic Rivers .............................................................................. 835 

D-1 River Segments from Initial Identification Efforts.......................................................................................... 838 
Appendix I 

798 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 

LIST OF ACRONYMS

Acronym or Abbreviation Full Phrase 

BLM United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management 

EA environmental assessment 

EIS environmental impact statement 

FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

FLPMA Federal Land Policy and Management Act 

GIS Geographic Information System 

IM Instruction Memorandum 

MFWP Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks 

MDEQ Montana Department of Environmental Quality 

MOU Memorandum of Understanding 

NPS United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service 

NWSRS National Wild and Scenic Rivers System 

Planning Area Butte Resource Management Plan planning area 

PPL Pennsylvania Power and Light Corporation 

RMA Recreation Management Area 

RMP resource management plan 

TMDL total maximum daily load 

USC United States Code 

USFS United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service 

VRM Visual Resource Management 

WSA Wilderness Study Area 

WSR Wild and Scenic River 

WSR Act Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
National Wild & Scenic River Suitability Study 

 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 799 

DRAFT WILD AND SCENIC RIVER 

ELIGIBILITY & SUITABILITY DETERMINATIONS 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

As part of the land use planning process for the Butte Resource Management Plan (RMP), a 

US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) interdisciplinary team 

analyzed all river and stream segments in the Butte Field Office administrative area (Planning 

Area) that might be eligible for inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System 

(NWSRS). This included screening all Planning Area rivers to identify those with BLM 

surface ownership. These initial screening and identification efforts resulted in a list of 164 

rivers or river segments for further consideration in the inventory process. 

Additional review focused on whether these 164 segments meet free-flowing criteria and 

contain any outstandingly remarkable values, as defined in the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 

1968 (Public Law 90-542 [as amended], 16 United States Code 1271-1287) (WSR Act). Of 

the 164 river segments, four segments totaling 12 miles meet the eligibility criteria. These 

include segments on the Big Hole River, Missouri River, Moose Creek, and Muskrat Creek.

Tentative classifications are assigned to each eligible segment as follows: Big Hole River – 

Recreational; Missouri River – Scenic; Moose Creek – Scenic; and Muskrat Creek – Scenic. 

INTRODUCTION 

Section 5(d)(1) of the WSR Act directs Federal agencies to consider potential wild and scenic 

rivers in their land and water planning processes (“In all planning for the use and 

development of water and related land resources, consideration shall be given by all Federal 

agencies involved to potential national wild, scenic and recreational river areas”). To fulfill 

this requirement, whenever the BLM undertakes a land use planning effort (e.g., an RMP), it 

analyzes river and stream segments that might be eligible for inclusion in the NWSRS. The 

BLM, Butte Field Office, is revising its older land use plans, namely the Headwaters RMP 

(BLM 1984) and the Dillon Management Framework Plan (BLM 1979). The revised RMP 

will provide a single, comprehensive land use plan that will guide management of public land 

administered by the Butte Field Office. 

This report is a record of the wild and scenic river study that is being conducted concurrently 

with the Butte RMP revision. This report documents BLM’s examination of Butte Field 

Office river segments as they relate to eligibility, suitability, and classification criteria in the 

WSR Act. 

The BLM Butte Field Office Planning Area is in mid-western Montana (Figure 1). Within the 

Planning Area, BLM administers about 311,000 acres of public surface land and 656,000 

acres of Federal mineral estate in Lewis and Clark, Jefferson, Broadwater, Deer Lodge, Silver 

Bow, Gallatin, and Park Counties. 

WHAT IS A WILD AND SCENIC RIVER? 

Congress enacted the WSR Act to provide a national policy for preserving and protecting 

selected rivers and river segments in their free-flowing condition for the benefit and 

enjoyment of present and future generations. The WSR Act provides criteria that must be 

considered during the analysis. The eligibility process is depicted in Figure 2. No rivers in the 

Planning Area are currently managed under the WSR Act. 

STEPS IN THE WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS STUDY PROCESS

The wild and scenic river study process is comprised of two main components: the inventory 

phase and the study phase. The inventory phase includes identifying eligible river and stream 

segments, assigning tentative classification (Wild, Scenic, or Recreational), and describing 

protective management for the eligible segments. The study phase includes determining the 

suitability of eligible segments for inclusion in the NWSRS and describing interim 

management measures. The inventory is conducted during the data-gathering stage of RMP 

revision, and the study phase is done during formulation of the Draft RMP and Proposed 

RMP. 
Appendix I 

800 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 

Inventory Phase 

The purpose of the inventory is to identify eligible rivers and river segments in the Planning 

Area and to assign them a tentative classification. The WSR Act directs agencies to consider a 

wide variety of internal and external sources to identify potentially eligible rivers. The goal is 

to avoid overlooking river segments that could be included in the NWSRS. In cases where a 

particular river segment is predominantly non-Federal in ownership and contains interspersed 

BLM-administered lands, BLM shall evaluate only its segment as to eligibility and defer to 

the state or private landowners’ discretion as to their determination of eligibility (BLM 2003). 

Identification of Eligible River Segments

The BLM applies standard criteria to identified river segments to determine eligibility. To be 

eligible, a river segment must be free-flowing and must possess at least one river-related value 

considered outstandingly remarkable. The specific criteria for free-flowing and outstandingly 

remarkable values are listed in Appendix A. 

There are several sources generally used to identify potentially eligible rivers, as follows: 

• The Outstanding Rivers List (Huntington and Echeverria 1991). This was compiled 

by the American Rivers Organization as a comprehensive nationwide compilation of 

rivers that possess some outstanding ecological, recreational, natural, cultural, or 

scenic values. Rivers protected by legislation and rivers currently unprotected are 

included. The list includes more than 15,000 outstanding United States river 

segments, roughly 300,000 river miles. Some of this information is redundant with 

the Nationwide Rivers Inventory, which is included within the Outstanding Rivers 

List, but much of it is additional information. 

• The Nationwide Rivers Inventory (NPS 2004). This inventory was initially completed 

in 1982 and is maintained and periodically updated by the National Park Service. 

Additions have been made as a result of BLM and U.S. Forest Service (USFS) 

inventories, done as part of their land use planning processes. It is a listing of more 

than 3,400 free-flowing river segments in the United States that are believed to 

possess one or more "outstandingly remarkable" natural or cultural values judged to 

be of more than local or regional significance. 

• Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks’ Class One Streams List (MWFP 2004a). This 

lists Class I streams, which are blue ribbon fisheries, throughout Montana. 

• The Montana Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (MWFP 2004b). 

The 2003-2007 Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan outlines 

Montana’s five-year plan for outdoor recreation management, conservation, and 

development. It provides the strategic framework for recreation facility managers to 

use as a guideline in planning and prioritizing resources for staff and funding and 

includes a timeline for implementation. 

• The USFS, Helena National Forest Wild and Scenic Rivers Eligibility Study (Helena 

National Forest 1989). The Helena National Forest conducted eligibility studies on 

some reaches that are considered in this report. Prior to 1989, segments of four 

streams located on Helena National Forest-administered lands were determined 

eligible: portions of Copper Creek, Little Blackfoot River, Beaver Creek, and the 

Missouri River from Hauser Dam to Cochran Gulch (Helena National Forest 2004). 

Helena National Forest will conduct suitability studies on these eligible reaches in 

the future. These include the three-mile free-flowing stretch of the Missouri River 

located below Hauser Dam and above Holter Lake (in the Helena National Forest), 

which is located in the very northern portion of the Butte Field Office; this was 

tentatively classified as scenic.

• River segments identified in public scoping during the RMP revision process. No 

river segments were identified by the public during the scoping process.

Appendix I 

802 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 

Figure 2 Wild and Scenic Rivers Eligibility Process Flow Chart 
National Wild & Scenic River Suitability Study 

 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 803 

Listing on any of these source lists does not represent an official determination of eligibility 

and, conversely, absence from these source lists does not indicate a river’s noneligibility. 

Tentative Classification

Once a river segment is considered eligible, it is assigned a tentative classification. There are 

three classes for rivers designated under the WSR Act: Wild, Scenic, and Recreational. The 

criteria for classification are defined in Section 2(b) of the WSR Act and are described in 

Appendix B. Classes are based on the type and degree of human development and access 

associated with the river and adjacent lands at the time of the inventory. 

The classification does not reflect the types of values present along a river segment. The 

classification assigned during the inventory phase is tentative. Final classification is a 

congressional legislative determination, along with designation of a river segment as part of 

the NWSRS. 

Interim Protective Management of Eligible Rivers

Rivers or river segments determined eligible must be managed to protect the free flow, 

outstandingly remarkable values, and tentative classification until a suitability study of the 

segment has been completed. Management guidelines to protect eligible candidate rivers are 

detailed in Appendix C, Interim Protection for Candidate Wild and Scenic Rivers. 

During the interim phase, any proposed action that could adversely affect or be inconsistent 

with wild and scenic river values would require management decisions based on a National 

Environmental Policy Act analysis and Section 202 of the Federal Land Policy and 

Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA), as follows: 

• Any proposed action that may be inconsistent with or adversely affect identified wild 

and scenic river values would require a site-specific environmental assessment (EA), 

opportunity for public involvement, and at least a 30-day public comment period. 

The decision notice record for the EA (involving these types of actions) would be 

conducted and signed at the field office level. However, before the decision notice 

record is signed, a copy of supporting documentation would be forwarded to the 

applicable state director for review and concurrence. 

• If the preparers of the EA determine that the proposal could have a major action 

significantly affecting the environment, a separate environmental impact statement 

(EIS) apart from the BLM RMP/EIS would be required. 

• Should the preparers of the EA or EIS determine that the action as proposed, or with 

appropriate mitigation or an acceptable alternative, would not have irreversible or 

irretrievable adverse impacts and would maintain or enhance identified wild and 

scenic river values, such action may be approved. 

• If the preparers of the EA or EIS determine that the action as proposed would have 

irreversible or irretrievable adverse impacts to identified wild and scenic river 

values, the decision on the action would be held temporarily in suspension until wild 

and scenic river evaluations are address and resolved through the BLM planning 

process. 

Suitability Study Phase 

The purpose of the study phase is to determine whether eligible river segments are suitable or 

unsuitable for inclusion in the NWSRS, per WSR Act criteria. The suitability evaluation does 

not result in actual designation but only a suitability determination for designation. Only 

Congress can designate a wild and scenic river. In some instances, the Secretary of the 

Interior may designate a wild and scenic river when the governor of a state, under certain 

conditions, petitions for a river to be designated. Congress would ultimately choose the 

legislative language if any suitable segments are presented to them. Water-protection 

strategies and measures to meet the purposes of the WSR Act would be the responsibility of 

Congress in any legislation proposed. 

Rivers found unsuitable would be dropped from further consideration and would be managed 

according to the objectives outlined in the RMP. 
Appendix I 

804 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 

The preliminary suitability evaluation is completed as the Draft RMP is prepared. Impacts 

that would occur from designation and non-designation of the eligible river segments then 

would be analyzed in the EIS associated with the RMP. Public review and comment on 

preliminary suitability determinations included in the Draft RMP/EIS would be considered 

before the BLM makes final suitability determinations in the proposed RMP. 

Suitability Criteria

The following 13 factors, identified in BLM Manual Section 8351 (BLM 1992), are applied to 

each eligible river segment when completing the suitability study: 

1. Characteristics that do or do not make the river a worthy addition to the NWSRS; 

2. The status of land ownership, minerals, use in the area, including the amount of 

private land involved, and associated or incompatible uses; 

3. Reasonably foreseeable potential uses of the land and related waters that would be 

enhanced, foreclosed, or curtailed if the area were included in the NWSRS and 

values that would be foreclosed or diminished if the area were not protected as part 

of the NWSRS; 

4. Federal or state agency that will administer the river should it be added to the 

NWSRS; 

5. Federal, state, tribal, local, public, or others with an interest in designation or nondesignation of the river, including the extent to which the agency proposes that 

administration of the river, including the costs thereof, be shared by state, local, or 

other agencies and individuals; 

6. Estimated cost to the United States of acquiring necessary lands, interests in lands, 

and administering the area should it be added to the NWSRS; 

7. A determination of the degree to which the state or its political subdivision(s) might 

participate in the preservation and administration of the river should it be proposed 

for inclusion in the NWSRS; 

8. The Federal agency’s ability or other mechanisms to protect and manage the 

identified river-related values other than designation into the NWSRS; 

9. An evaluation of the adequacy of local zoning and other land use controls in 

protecting the river’s outstandingly remarkable values by preventing incompatible 

development; 

10. Support or opposition to designation; 

11. Historical or existing rights that could be adversely affected with designation; and 

12. The consistency of designation with other agency plans, programs, or policies in 

meeting regional objectives; and 

13. The contribution to a river system, watershed, or basin integrity. 

Interim Management of Suitable Segments

The WSR Act requires that interim management measures be developed to protect the freeflowing nature, outstandingly remarkable values, and recommended classification of suitable 

segments until Congressional action regarding designation is taken. Guidelines for interim 

management are included in Appendix C. 

INVENTORY PHASE FOR THE BUTTE RMP REVISION 

Various resource personnel from the BLM’s Butte Field Office were consulted to conduct the 

wild and scenic rivers inventory in support of the RMP revision currently underway. The 

interdisciplinary team was composed of BLM staff specialists in lands and realty, 

wildlife/fisheries/riparian biology, range/riparian resources, recreation, visual resources, 

cultural resources, minerals, and geology. 
National Wild & Scenic River Suitability Study 

 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 805 

IDENTIFICATION OF ELIGIBLE RIVER SEGMENTS 

To avoid overlooking potentially eligible river segments, a combination of sources were used. 

The primary source was the BLM’s geographic information system (GIS) rivers and streams 

layer (BLM 2004b), which is a comprehensive list of potentially free-flowing waterbodies 

within the Planning Area. The GIS was cross-referenced with additional sources, including 

the Outstanding Rivers List (Huntington and Echeverria 1991), Nationwide Rivers Inventory 

(NPS 2004), Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks’ (MFWP) Class One Streams List (MWFP 

2004a), and Montana Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (MWFP 2004b). 

The Nationwide Rivers Inventory includes two river segments on BLM-administered lands in 

the Planning Area: 1.06 miles of the Yellowstone River in Park County (Township 7 South, 

Range 7 East, Sections 19 and 20, Montana Principal Meridian) and the 3.1-mile segment of 

the Missouri River, between Hauser Dam and Upper Holter Lake (NPS 2004). 

From these sources, the BLM interdisciplinary team compiled an inventory of all rivers on 

BLM-administered surface lands in the Planning Area. BLM limited the inventory to the 

lands it administers, per recent changes to BLM Manual 8351, Wild and Scenic Rivers—

Policy and Program Direction for Identification, Evaluation, and Management. The manual 

revision states that “In cases where a particular river segment is predominantly non-Federal in 

ownership and contains interspersed BLM-administered lands, BLM shall evaluate only its 

segment as to eligibility and defer to the State or to the private landowners’ discretion as to 

their determination of eligibility” (BLM 2003). As part of the initial screening process, all 

Planning Area rivers were divided into multiple segments based on BLM surface ownership. 

Initial screening resulted in a list of 164 river segments on BLM-administered lands for 

further consideration. These river segments are located along 55 rivers. These rivers or river 

segments include those listed in Appendix D which are depicted on Figure 3. 

Additional review focused on whether any of these 164 segments met free-flowing criteria 

and contained any outstandingly remarkable values, as defined in the WSR Act. Members of 

the BLM interdisciplinary team conducted this review for each of their areas of expertise, 

using their knowledge of the area and consulting available inventory information. This 

information was considered against the outstandingly remarkable values criteria provided in 

Appendix A. Based on their findings, team members proposed four river segments, Big Hole 

River, Missouri River, Muskrat Creek, and Moose Creek, as eligible for further study because 

they contain outstandingly remarkable values and are free flowing (Figure 4 and Table 1). 

Following Table 1 is a description of outstandingly remarkable values for each candidate river 

segment. 

Indian Creek Segment 5 was initially found to be eligible. Further evaluation during the 

suitability phase determined the segment not to be free flowing. The extensive historic and 

current mining activities have resulted in a channel which does not meet the “natural 

condition” requirements of free flowing. Numerous placer piles along the segment have 

resulted in severe modification of the natural channel. 

The BLM interdisciplinary team determined that the Yellowstone River segment included in 

The Nationwide Rivers Inventory does not contain any outstandingly remarkable values. The 

Missouri River segment between Hauser Dam and Upper Holter Lake (the same segment 

described above and in Table 1), which also is included in The Nationwide Rivers Inventory,

does have outstandingly remarkable values, as shown in Table 1. 

As part of their RMP revision, the BLM Dillon Field Office evaluated one river segment 

located in the Butte Field Office, the Lower Madison from Black’s Ford to Gray Cliff. The 

Dillon RMP final eligibility report found this segment eligible with a temporary classification 

of Recreational. The segment was not found suitable in the Dillon RMP. 
Appendix I

806 Butte Draft RMP/EIS

Butte

Helena

Bozeman

Boulder

Big Sky

Townsend

Gardiner

Belgrade

Anaconda

Whitehall

Livingston

Three Forks

East Helena

West Yellowstone

Deerlodge

County

Silverbow

County

Lewis and Clark

County

Broadwater

County

Gallatin

County

Park

County

Meagher

County Powell

County

Granite

County

Beaverhead

County

Madison

County

Wheatland

County

Sweet Grass

County

Stillwater

County

Yellowstone National

 Park

Fremont

County

Clark

County

Jefferson

County

15

15

90

90

12

12

WYOMING

IDAHO

MONTANA

IDAHO

Cascade

County

Upper

Big Hole River

Missouri River

Moose Creek

Muskrat

Creek

0 25 Miles

Planning Area Rivers

with Eligible Segments

FIGURE 3

No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management (BLM) for use of

data for purposes not intended by BLM.

Unknown

Water County Boundaries

State Boundaries

Interstates

Roads

Rivers and Streams

Rivers of Interest

Private BFO Planning Area Boundary

BLM

BOR

Local Gov't

NPS

State

Other Federal

USFS

USFWS

BLM, Butte Field Office

Butte RMP and EIS
National Wild & Scenic River Suitability Study

Butte Draft RMP/EIS 807

Butte

Helena

Bozeman

Boulder

Big Sky

Townsend

Gardiner

Belgrade

Anaconda

Whitehall

Livingston

Three Forks

East Helena

West Yellowstone

Deerlodge

County

Silverbow

County

Lewis and Clark

County

Broadwater

County

Gallatin

County

Park

County

Meagher

County Powell

County

Granite

County

Beaverhead

County

Madison

County

Wheatland

County

Sweet Grass

County

Stillwater

County

Yellowstone National

 Park

Freemont

County

Clark

County

Jefferson

County

15

15

90

90

12

12

WYOMING

IDAHO

MONTANA

IDAHO

Cascade

County

Upper

Big Hole River

Missouri River

Moose Creek

Muskrat

Creek

0 25 Miles

Planning Area River Segments

Proposed as Eligible for

Further Study

FIGURE 4

Upper Big Hole River Moose Creek (within Humbug Spires

2.3 miles Wilderness Study Area)

Tentative Classification: Recreational 4.0 miles

Figure 5 Tentative Classification: Wild

Figure 8

Missouri River (Hauser Dam to

Upper Holter Lake) Muskrat Creek

3.1 miles 2.6 miles

Tentative Classification: Scenic Tentative Classification: Scenic

Figure 7 Figure 9

River Segments Proposed as Eligible for Further Study

Eligible River Segments

Unknown

Water

County Boundaries

State Boundaries

Interstates

Roads

Rivers and Streams

Rivers of Interest

Private BFO Planning Area Boundary

BLM

BOR

Local Gov't

NPS

State

Other Federal

USFS

USFWS

No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management (BLM) for use of

data for purposes not intended by BLM.

BLM, Butte Field Office

Butte RMP and EIS
 Wild & Scenic River Suitability Study 

 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 808 Table 1 Eligible River Segments and Tentative Classification Segment General Location Legal Description1 Length Outstandingly Remar

kable 

Values 

FreeFlowing? Tentative Classification Proposed Boundary 

1. Upper Big Hole River 

About 11 miles west of Dickie 

Bridge Recreation Area and 

16 miles northeast of town of 

Wisdom 

T1N R13W 

Sec 8, 17, 18, 19, 

Deerlodge County 

2.3 miles 

(Figure 5) 

Recreational 

Fish 

Yes Recreational 0.25-mile on 

each side 

2. Missouri River Hauser Dam to 

Upper Holter Lake 

T12N R3W 

Sec 13 and 

T12N R2W 

Sec 19, 29, 30 

Lewis and Clark 

County 

3.1 miles 

(Figure 6) 

Recreational 

Wildlife 

Scenic 

Yes Scenic 0.25-mile on 

each side 

3. Moose Creek Entire creek length within 

Humbug Spires Wilderness 

Study Area 

T1S R8W 

Sec 9, 10 

Silver Bow County 

4.0 miles

(Figure 7) 

Scenic 

Recreational 

Yes Scenic 0.25-mile on 

each side 

4. Muskrat Creek About 5 miles northeast of 

town of Boulder 

T7N R3W 

Sec 31, 32, 33 

Jefferson County 

2.6 miles

(Figure 8) 

Fish Yes Scenic 0.25-mile on 

each side 

1T=Township, N=North, W=West, R=Range, Sec=Section, Montana Principal Meridian 
National Wild & Scenic River Suitability Study

Butte Draft RMP/EIS 809

Upper Big Hole River

0 1 Miles

Upper Big Hole River

FIGURE 5

Upper Big Hole River

2.3 miles

Tentative Classification: Recreational

Roads

Eligible River Segments (Shaded area is 

0.25 mile on either side of river where on

BLM Land)

BLM

Private

State

USFS

Water Rivers and Streams

BFO Boundary Rivers of Interest

No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management (BLM) for use of

data for purposes not intended by BLM.

BLM, Butte Field Office

Butte RMP and EIS
Appendix I

810 Butte Draft RMP/EIS

Missouri 

River

Helena National Forest

Upper Holter Lake

Hauser Dam

Hauser Lake

0 1 Miles

Missouri River

FIGURE 6

Missouri River (Hauser Dam to

Upper Holter Lake)

3.1 miles

Tentative Classification: Scenic

Eligible River Segments (Shaded area is 

0.25 mile on either side of river where on

BLM Land)

BFO Boundary

BLM

Local Gov‘t

Private

State

USFS

Water

No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management (BLM) for use of

data for purposes not intended by BLM.

BLM, Butte Field Office

Butte RMP and EIS
National Wild & Scenic River Suitability Study

Butte Draft RMP/EIS 811

Moose Creek

Humbug Spires

Wilderness

Study Area

15

Deerlodge 

 National

 Forest

Deerlodge 

 National

 Forest

0 1 Miles

Moose Creek

FIGURE 7

Moose Creek (within Humbug Spires

Wilderness Study Area)

4.0 miles

Tentative Classification: Wild

BLM

Private

USFS

Rivers and Streams

Rivers of Interest

BFO Boundary

Humbug Spires Wilderness

Study Area

Eligible River Segments (Shaded area is 

0.25 mile on either side of river where 

on BLM Land)

State Interstate

No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management (BLM) for use of

data for purposes not intended by BLM.

BLM, Butte Field Office

Butte RMP and EIS
Appendix I

812 Butte Draft RMP/EIS

Muskrat

Creek

15

0 1 Miles

Muskrat Creek

FIGURE 8

Deerlodge 

National

Forest

Helena

National

Forest

Muskrat Creek

2.6 miles

Tentative Classification: Scenic

BLM

Private

State

USFS

Rivers and Streams

Rivers of Interest

BFO Boundary Eligible River Segments (Shaded area is

0.25 mile on either side of river where 

on BLM Land)

Interstate

National Forest Boundary

No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management (BLM) for use of

data for purposes not intended by BLM.

BLM, Butte Field Office

Butte RMP and EIS
 National Wild & Scenic River Suitability Study 

 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 813 

IMPAIRED WATER BODIES 

Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires that water bodies violating state or tribal water 

quality standards be identified as impaired and placed on a 303(d) list. It is the state’s 

responsibility to develop its own 303(d) list and to establish a total maximum daily load for 

the parameter(s) causing impairment. Moose Creek and Muskrat Creek are identified as 

impaired water bodies on the Montana Department of Environmental Quality’s (MDEQ) 2004 

Draft 303(d) list (MDEQ 2005). 

An impaired stream cannot be classified as Wild but could be classified as Scenic or 

Recreational. The classification criteria specify that rivers will not be precluded from Scenic 

or Recreational classification because of poor water quality at the time of their study, 

provided that a water quality improvement plan exists or is being developed in compliance 

with applicable Federal and State laws. The MDEQ has established a schedule to prepare 

water quality improvement plans on all impaired water bodies by 2007. As such, Moose 

Creek and Muskrat Creek are not precluded from tentative Scenic or Recreational 

classifications. Further evaluations, as described below, show a discrepancy between the 

MDEQ listing of Muskrat Creek and current conditions. Further investigation is necessary, 

and this segment may need to be reclassified. If the eligible segment is determined not to be 

water quality impaired, this segment would be eligible for Wild classification. 

TENTATIVE CLASSIFICATION

Tentative classification of each of the four segments is listed in Table 1. 

Segment 1: Upper Big Hole River 

Eligible segment length on BLM-administered lands: 2.3 miles (Figure 5) 

Tentative Classification: Recreational 

The outstandingly remarkable values for this segment are described below. 

Recreational

This river reach is rated as a Class 1, Blue Ribbon Fisheries. MFWP assessed this sport 

fisheries value based on a combination of fish abundance, fishing pressure, aesthetics, and 

access. This is the highest rating given for state rivers. This reach attracts numerous national 

and international visitors, and out-of-state visitors represent about 30 percent of the annual 

use each year (MFWP 2004a). The area is famous for its fly-fishing, especially during the 

salmon/stone fly hatches. Other quality recreational uses, although not outstandingly 

remarkable, include river floating (May through July), hiking, camping, wildlife observation, 

and hunting. 

Fish

Fish species include rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), brown trout (Salmo trutta), and 

brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis), and the State-listed and BLM sensitive species, Montana 

arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus montanus). This is the only free-flowing river in the lower 

48 states that supports the Montana arctic grayling. 

Segment 2: Missouri River (Hauser Dam to Upper Holter Lake) 

Eligible segment length on BLM-administered lands: 3.1 miles (Figure 6) 

Tentative Classification: Scenic 

The outstandingly remarkable values for this segment are described below. 

Recreational

This river reach is rated as a Class 1—Blue Ribbon Fisheries, which is the highest rating 

given for state rivers. MFWP assessed this sport fisheries value, based on a combination of 

fish abundance, fishing pressure, aesthetics, and access. This reach attracts numerous national 

and international anglers for brown and rainbow trout and Kokanee salmon (Oncorhynchus 

nerka kennerlyi). 
Appendix I 

814 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 

This reach is also part of the Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail. The Lewis and Clark 

Expedition passed through this reach on July 20, 1805, on their westward trek to the Pacific 

Ocean. On that day, Meriwether Lewis was traveling along the river, while William Clark was 

exploring the uplands and hunting game. This reach is expected to receive higher visitation 

from out-of-state residents during the bicentennial of the Lewis and Clark Expedition in 2005 

and 2006. The corridor is highly natural, and for the most part still appears as seen by the 

Expedition. 

Other high-quality recreational opportunities associated with this river segment and the 

adjoining BLM lands include river floating, primitive camping, hiking, wildlife observation, 

and big-game hunting. 

Wildlife

There is significant habitat for regionally important populations of Federally-listed threatened 

bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), golden eagle (Aquila 

chrysaetos), peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus anatum), and osprey (Pandion haliaetus). 

Scenic

Transitions in geology and topography provide outstanding vistas with stark contrasts. The 

upstream portion of the segment is bounded by steep colorful canyon walls that transition into 

rolling hill topography as one proceeds downstream. The alternating distant vistas contrasted 

with steep canyon walls provide a unique visual experience. The area is rated A for scenic 

quality, as defined in the BLM Visual Resource Inventory Handbook, H-8410-1 (BLM 1986). 

Shoreline development criteria for Wild designation requires that development be primitive, 

with little evidence of human activity. The presence of a few inconspicuous structures, 

particularly those of historic or cultural value, is acceptable. However, due to the 

development visible from the river along this segment (e.g. the Beaver Creek parking area and 

a pit toilet) the Missouri River is not suitable for Wild designation. 

Segment 3: Moose Creek 

Eligible segment length on BLM-administered lands: 4.0 miles (Figure 7) 

Tentative Classification: Scenic 

The outstandingly remarkable values for this segment are described below. 

Scenic

The scenic quality of this area is rated A. The combination of contrasting land features with 

pronounced rock spires, irregular topography, and the variety of color patterns along this 

creek corridor provide outstanding visual values that are managed as a Visual Resource 

Management (VRM) Class I area. The area immediately adjacent to the creek varies from 

wooded to meadow with a meandering creek and a well-developed riparian area. Upstream of 

where the trail diverges from the creek, it becomes steeper with water cascading through 

boulders. The creek returns to a meadow-type creek near the upstream end of the segment 

where it enters private land. 

Recreational 

The outstanding recreation opportunities associated with Moose Creek and the adjoining lands 

in the Humbug Spires Wilderness Study Area (WSA) attract visitors both nationally and 

internationally. The area was one of the first BLM Primitive Areas to be established and is 

protected as a WSA. This area was studied and recommended for wilderness in 1981. 

The most popular forms of recreation include rock climbing, sightseeing, hiking, 

backpacking, hunting, wildlife observation, and primitive camping. Of these, the most unique 

and outstanding opportunity is for rock climbing. The granite spires provide some of the 

highest quality hard-rock climbing in Montana. There are about 10 spires between 300 and 

600 feet high, and an additional 50 others that range between 50 and 300 feet. The spires are 

not located within the Moose Creek study corridor, but the hiking trail through the corridor 

provides access to the spires. 
 National Wild & Scenic River Suitability Study 

 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 815 

Hiking opportunities were also assessed as excellent in the Humbug Spires WSA, given the 

diversity in landform types and vegetation. Hiking challenges range from gentle maintained 

trails to adventurous game trails with numerous elevation changes. Hikers are afforded highquality scenic views, wildlife observations, colorful wildflowers, remote campsites, and trout 

fishing along this perennial stream. The scenic and recreational values of the study corridor 

are not duplicated in any other proposed or existing wilderness area. The experiences to be 

found when visiting the Humbug Spires are unique and cannot be compared to those found 

anywhere else in the region (BLM undated). 

The eligible segment’s tentative classification would have been Wild if it were not listed as an 

impaired water body on MDEQ’s Draft 2004 and Final 2002 303(d) list (MDEQ 2005), as 

discussed above in the section, “Inventory Phase for the Butte RMP Revision, Impaired Water 

Bodies.” The portion of Moose Creek south of the Humbug Spires WSA is not included in the 

eligible segment because it does not contain any outstandingly remarkable values. 

Segment 4: Muskrat Creek 

Eligible segment length on BLM-administered lands: 2.6 miles (Figure 8) 

Tentative Classification: Scenic 

The outstandingly remarkable values for this segment are described below. 

Fish 

Muskrat Creek, a tributary to the Boulder River, provides significant habitat for westslope 

cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki lewisi). Genetically pure westslope cutthroat trout are 

estimated to exist in only two to four percent of their historic stream distribution (Montana 

Chapter of the American Fisheries Society 2004). Muskrat Creek contains genetically pure 

westslope cutthroat trout, and the headwaters of the stream are in a roadless area of BLM- and 

Forest Service-administered lands that is essentially primitive in nature. 

MFWP, the BLM, and the USFS are collaborating to conserve westslope cutthroat trout in 

Muskrat Creek. A wooden barrier was constructed near the Forest Service boundary at river 

mile 7.6 in 1997. Since 1996, brook trout have been annually removed (using electrofishing) 

from Muskrat Creek upstream of the barrier to a natural barrier at river mile 9. In 1997, native 

westslope cutthroat trout also were relocated above the natural barrier (formerly a fishless 

section of stream). The westslope cutthroat trout relocated above the natural barrier survived 

and reproduced in the upper basin, and, by 2002, westslope cutthroat trout had expanded 

upstream to the headwaters (approximately river mile 13.5), as well as downstream 

throughout the stream. 

Brook trout have been successfully removed between the manmade barrier and natural barrier. 

In the summer of 2003, only 18 brook trout were found in July, and no brook trout were 

captured during an extensive effort of four electrofishing passes in October. All the brook 

trout captured during July 2003 were age two and older, confirming that no brook trout 

successfully recruited to the population during the past two to three years. Approximately 4.5 

miles of Muskrat Creek is once again considered to have a healthy population of westslope 

cutthroat trout. No brook trout were captured in 2004 or 2005 indicating that brook trout have 

been eradicated upstream of the constructed barrier. The Muskrat Creek population is 

considered the most secure and strongest westslope cutthroat trout population in the Elkhorn 

Mountains. Sampling will continue in the future. 

Riparian vegetation is in excellent condition along Muskrat Creek on BLM- and USFSadministered lands. The riparian vegetation provides exceptionally high-quality habitat for 

numerous wildlife species, including critical winter habitat for elk (Cervus elaphus). 

FINAL ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATIONS

Public comment will be accepted on eligibility recommendations in this report. The BLM will 

review comments and make adjustments if comments show eligibility criteria are not met. 

This could affect final decisions on eligible rivers and ultimately suitability decisions. 
Appendix I 

816 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 

SUITABILITY STUDY PHASE FOR THE BUTTE RMP REVISION 

The preliminary suitability evaluation is completed as the Draft RMP is prepared. Impacts 

that would occur from designation or nondesignation of the eligible river segments then 

would be analyzed in the EIS associated with the RMP. Public review and comment on 

preliminary suitability determinations included in the Draft RMP/EIS would be considered 

before the BLM makes final suitability determinations in the proposed RMP. 

The WSR Act requires that interim management measures be developed to protect the freeflowing nature, outstandingly remarkable values, and recommended classification of suitable 

segments until Congressional action regarding designation is taken. Guidelines for interim 

management are included in Appendix C. 

SUITABILITY CRITERIA FOR ELIGIBLE SEGMENTS

This section contains a discussion of the suitability factors related to each of the four eligible 

segments. 

Segment 1: Upper Big Hole River 

Length within Planning Area: 2.3 miles (Figure 5) 

Tentative Classification: Recreational 

Proposed Boundary: Approximately 0.25-mile from river bank on either side of the river. 

1. Characteristics that do or do not make the river a worthy addition to the NWSRS: 

The eligible segment contains recreational and fisheries outstandingly remarkable values, 

making the segment worthy of addition to the NWSRS. This segment of the Big Hole River 

provides important habitat for Montana arctic grayling. 

A river ford used predominantly by hunters accessing the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National 

Forest is present within the segment. The feasibility of crossing varies depending on time of 

year and flows. Numerous vehicles have been mired while crossing, requiring a tow to 

extract them from the river. Consequently, the presence of this ford presents a safety hazard 

to many users. Use of this ford potentially impacts the Big Hole River water quality by 

increasing sediment, disturbing the bank, and leaking of oil and gas. Additionally, weeds are 

spread downstream as the river washes the undercarriage of vehicles. 

There are no known water quality issues with this segment of the Big Hole River. 

Downstream of the eligible segment, from Divide Creek to the confluence with the Jefferson 

River, the Big Hole River has been identified as water quality impaired by the MDEQ 303d 

list (MDEQ 2005). This listing does not pertain to the eligible segment. 

2. The status of landownership, minerals, use in the area, including the amount of private 

land involved and associated or incompatible uses: 

Landownership within the 0.25-mile study corridor is predominantly Federal. The BLM 

manages 678 acres (89 percent). The BLM manages lands on both sides of the river for almost 

the entire segment (Figure 5). A private landowner controls the land along the western bank 

for approximately 0.25-mile at the northern end of the segment. There are two additional 

points where private land is within the 0.25-mile study corridor but not adjacent to the river 

along the western side. 

The area has low oil and gas potential and very limited lode gold potential. There are no 

current or anticipated minerals uses in the area. 

3. Reasonably foreseeable potential uses of the land and related waters that would be 

enhanced, foreclosed, or curtailed if the area were included in the NWSRS and values 

that would be foreclosed or diminished if the area is not protected as part of the NWSRS: 

Grazing is permitted along this entire segment. Potential impacts from livestock grazing 

within the river corridor may include increased sedimentation resulting from bank erosion, 

transport of weed species, and increased nutrient input in the river. Designation of this 

segment could result in increased monitoring to ensure grazing activities are not adversely 

impacting the recreational and fisheries outstandingly remarkable values. If adverse impacts 
 National Wild & Scenic River Suitability Study 

 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 817 

are observed or anticipated, management of grazing in this segment would be more restricted 

on BLM land. Grazing occurring upstream on private land would not be subject to BLM’s 

authority. 

There is no active timber harvest occurring within the corridor. If the segment were included 

in the NWSRS, timber harvest within the study corridor would be prohibited. 

Currently, recreational use within the study corridor consists of occasional camping and 

fishing. There are no developed facilities present. In addition, the ford described earlier 

provides hunting access to the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest. In general, use is 

relatively light, the area is not well known outside the Butte area. Designation of this segment 

would bring national recognition to this segment and would likely attract visitors from a much 

greater area. Because of the small acreage of BLM land, increased use would be difficult to 

disperse and manage. This could cause significant negative impacts to the riparian habitat and 

stream and reduce the value of this segment as a National WSR. Consequently, camping and 

fishing access would either need to be developed and intensely managed or restricted as 

popularity increases. 

4. Federal or State agency that will administer the river should it be added to the NWSRS. 

If the river were added to the NWSRS, this segment would be administered by the BLM. 

5. Federal, State, Tribal, local, public, or other interest in designating or not designating the 

river, including the extent to which the agency proposes that administration of the river, 

including the costs thereof, be shared by state, local, or other agencies and individuals: 

No comments were received during the scoping period pertaining to designation of this 

segment. Other Federal agencies, the State, local, public and other interests will have the 

opportunity to review and comment on this report. Any interest in designating or not 

designating would be identified during this period, and this section would be revised 

accordingly. 

6. Estimated cost to the United States of acquiring necessary lands, interests in lands, and 

administering the area should it be added to the NWSRS: 

The 2.3-mile segment being studied is predominantly Federal land. The outstandingly 

remarkable values could be protected or enhanced without further acquisition of land. The 

BLM would consider the acquisition of fee title or conservation easements on the remaining 

27 acres of private land within the 0.25-mile study corridor. Cost of acquisition would be 

approximately $1,000 per acre. 

7. A determination of the degree to which the State or its political subdivision(s) might 

participate in the preservation and administration of the river should it be proposed for 

inclusion in the NWSRS: 

MFWP would continue to regulate floating outfitters. Regulations currently limit the days of 

the week outfitters are permitted to float certain sections of the Big Hole River. These 

regulations serve to maintain the recreational outstandingly remarkable values and reduce 

fishing pressure in certain areas. 

The State controls a small parcel of land immediately upstream of the segment. Currently, 

State management of this parcel is compatible with the protection and enhancement of the 

recreational and fisheries outstandingly remarkable values within the eligible segment. 

Because it is immediately upstream of the eligible segment, activities on the State parcel 

could impact water quality within the eligible segment. Management would need to be 

coordinated with the State. 

8. The Federal agency’s ability or other mechanisms to protect and manage the identified 

river related values other than WSR designation: 

The BLM currently has a Big Hole River Plan which describes management for all BLM 

parcels along the river, including the eligible segment. This plan provides management 

measures which would protect the outstandingly remarkable values in the eligible segment. 

Management measures from the Big Hole River Plan include the following: 
Appendix I 

818 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 

• Visual qualities on BLM lands as seen from the river will be maintained to protect 

recreation quality and scenic viewing in accordance with VRM Classifications. 

Currently, most of the corridor is managed on VRM Class II. Under this 

Classification, changes in the basic elements due to management action should not 

be evident within the landscape as seen from the river. 

• Do not issue grazing leases on BLM parcels within the Recreation Management Area 

(RMA) that are currently unleased or not allotted. 

• No surface occupancy stipulations within 1⁄4 mile of the river or in critical seen areas 

should be established for new oil and gas leases. In addition, leases will be subject 

to vehicle use restrictions. 

• All road construction on BLM lands within the RMA must be compatible with the 

specific management objectives of this plan. 

• Enact travel restrictions within developed and undeveloped recreation sites as 

necessary to protect resources 

• All BLM lands within a one mile corridor from each side of the river shall be 

retained in public ownership 

• Acquire additional land within the RMA corridor as feasible to provide for increased 

recreational opportunities and protect scenic resource. 

• Do no issue commercial recreation use permits on the Big Hole River and limit 

permits for commercial camps and other uses within the RMA based on available 

space and public uses. 

This segment is categorized as a VRM Class II area. The management objective for Class II 

areas is to retain the existing character of the landscape. The level of change to the 

characteristic landscape should be low. Management activities may be seen but should not 

attract the attention of the casual observer. Any changes must repeat the basic elements of 

form, line, color, and texture found in the predominant natural features of the characteristic 

landscape. 

The BLM, within the site specific travel plan is assessing management alternatives for the use 

of the ford, which presents both water quality and safety concerns. Current management 

allows unrestricted crossings, which could adversely affect water quality and therefore 

fisheries values in the segment. Management changes such as prohibiting use of the ford or 

limiting use to game retrieval would only reduce the potential degradation of water quality 

and bank erosion. River flows within the upper reach are subject to seasonal moisture 

conditions and existing water rights. These conditions typically reduce flow in late summer to 

levels that impact fishery resources and prevent recreational floating. 

9. An evaluation of the adequacy of local zoning and other land use controls in protecting 

the river’s outstandingly remarkable values by preventing incompatible development: 

The 27 acres (4 percent) of private land would be subject to local zoning controls. Local 

zoning would not be adequate to prevent new construction on the private land holdings within 

the WSR study corridor. No new development is allowed within 150 feet of the high water 

mark along the Big Hole River, and a permit is required for construction within 500 feet of 

the high water mark. It is possible, that construction would be permitted within the 1⁄4 mile 

study corridor. All 27 acres are within the floodplain.

10. Support or opposition to designation: 

As of the time of the preliminary suitability determination there has been no known support or 

opposition to designation of this segment. Any comments received pertaining to this segment 

during the review of the draft RMP would be incorporated into this report and considered 

when making a final suitability determination. 

11. Historical or existing rights that could be adversely affected with designation: 

There are no known historical or existing rights that would be affected with designation. 
 National Wild & Scenic River Suitability Study 

 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 819 

12. The consistency of designation with other agency plans, programs, or policies in meeting 

regional objectives: 

Designation of this segment would be consistent with the Big Hole River Management Plan, 

and VRM II classification, provided designation does not result in a significant increase in 

use. However, national recognition of this segment could result in a significant increase in the 

number of people visiting this segment, which could be incompatible with these other plans, 

given the high riparian and natural value of the area. 

13. The contribution to a river system, watershed, or basin integrity: 

The eligible segment provides important habitat for salmonid fish species, including the 

Montana arctic grayling. Aquatic habitat in this segment helps support the fish populations 

throughout the river system. 

Segment 2: Missouri River (Hauser Dam to Upper Holter Lake) 

Length within Planning Area: 3.1 miles (Figure 6) 

Tentative Classification: Scenic 

Proposed Boundary: Approximately 0.25-mile on from river bank on either side of the river. 

1. Characteristics that do or do not make the river a worthy addition to the NWSRS: 

The outstandingly remarkable recreational, scenic and wildlife values associated with this 

segment make it a worthy addition to the NWSRS. These values are described in detail in the 

eligibility portion of this report. 

Flows are controlled by releases from Canyon Ferry and Hauser Dams, located near the 

segment’s upstream end. The amount of water released is governed by the Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission (FERC) license for operations with the Pennsylvania Power and 

Light Corporation (PPL) Montana. The FERC license provides adequate flows for 

recreational and fisheries needs. These flows are sufficient to protect the recreational, 

fisheries, and scenic outstandingly remarkable values described for this segment. The dam is 

only visible at the very upstream end of this segment. The river immediately takes a bend 

through the canyon, obscuring view of the dam. Generally, good water quality supports high 

quality fisheries. 

The segment has limited access and very little development along the shore. These relatively 

primitive conditions provide a setting similar to what Lewis and Clark would have 

experienced during their journey westward. 

The USFS maintains a small access area within the 0.25-mile study corridor at the mouth of 

Beaver Creek. This facility provides fishing access and consists of a toilet, small parking lot, 

and fence. During the site visit in August 2005, this area was barely visible from the river. 

Vegetation obscured views of the fence and parking lot, but the toilet was visible for a brief 

period where there was a gap in vegetation. The area is likely more visible during the fall and 

winter when foliage is not as thick. This is a relatively minor intrusion on the scenic values of 

this segment. Overnight camping at this site is not permitted. 

2. The status of landownership, minerals, use in the area, including the amount of private 

land involved and associated or incompatible uses: 

Almost all lands (93 percent) within 0.25-mile of the river bank along this segment are 

Federally-managed. The USFS, Helena National Forest manages lands along the eastern bank 

for the entire length. The BLM manages all lands along the western bank for the entire 

segment length. There is a small private landholding located near the downstream end of the 

segment west of the river channel approximately 1/8-mile inland from the shore. This private 

landholding is not essential to the protection and enhancement of outstandingly remarkable 

values and could be excluded from the designated corridor. These lands are not at risk to 

development given the conditions of an existing easement on the property. 

The USFS has found this segment to be eligible for inclusion in the NWSRS but has not 

completed a suitability study. 
Appendix I 

820 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 

Land uses include some permitted grazing on BLM land along the western shoreline. The 

area is not fenced, and cattle have access to the river. It appears that grazing pressure along 

this segment is relatively light because rough terrain limits access to the river corridor. 

This segment of the Missouri River has no significant mineral potential. The general area has 

moderate potential for oil and gas discoveries, but exploration is not likely to take place along 

the river. There are no current mineral resource uses along this segment. 

3. Reasonably foreseeable potential uses of the land and related waters that would be 

enhanced, foreclosed, or curtailed if the area were included in the NWSRS and values 

that would be foreclosed or diminished if the area is not protected as part of the NWSRS: 

Although unlikely, any increase in the height of Holter Dam would be prohibited if the river 

were designated. Such an increase would change the free-flowing nature of the river in this 

segment. Increasing the height of Holter Dam and the resulting increase in the size of Holter 

Lake and Upper Holter Lake is not likely to occur and may be physically infeasible because 

of the area’s topography and the number of residences and other structures located along the 

shores of Holter Lake and Upper Holter Lake. 

If the segment were to become part of the NWSRS, potential changes in Hauser Dam 

operations, outside the current FERC license, which could be considered the next time the 

FERC license is renewed would need to consider how such change could affect the 

outstandingly remarkable values. Significant reduction or increase in water releases from 

Hauser Dam could adversely affect the recreational, scenic, and wildlife values associated 

with this segment. As a Federal agency, FERC would need to ensure protection of these 

values when relicensing. 

Grazing on the BLM land could be subject to increased restrictions if the segment were 

included in the NWSRS. The BLM would monitor the effects of cattle access to the river to 

ensure that grazing use is not adversely affecting the outstandingly remarkable values. If 

restrictions are necessary to protect river values, the BLM would work with the grazing 

allotment permittee to establish adequate restrictions. 

Designation of this segment would prevent the sale of Federal lands within the corridor and 

would prevent extensive development along its shoreline. This segment is part of the Lewis 

and Clark National Historic Trail and is currently in a condition similar to how it was during 

their expedition. Not designating this segment could potentially result in changes to the 

landscape, altering the primitive nature of this segment. 

4. Federal or State agency that will administer the river should it be added to the NWSRS. 

Administration of this segment would ultimately be decided by Congress. All lands included 

in the river corridor are Federally-managed. Administration would likely be joint management 

between BLM and USFS, as each agency currently manages half of the corridor. 

5. Federal, State, Tribal, local, public, or other interest in designating or not designating the 

river, including the extent to which the agency proposes that administration of the river, 

including the costs thereof, be shared by state, local, or other agencies and individuals: 

The FERC and PPL Montana would have an interest in the designation of this segment as it 

pertains to water releases from Hauser Dam. Current operations, as identified in the FERC 

license, provide adequate flows to maintain the recreational, wildlife, and scenic 

outstandingly remarkable values associated with this segment. Although these flow 

requirements are not likely to change, relicensing efforts in the future would need to consider 

the protection of outstandingly remarkable values. 

6. Estimated cost to the United States of acquiring necessary lands, interests in lands, and 

administering the area should it be added to the NWSRS: 

All lands adjacent to the river segment are Federally-managed. Approximately 68 acres of 

land within 0.25-mile of the river are privately owned. This includes the private lands within 

0.25-mile both upstream and downstream of the segment. The BLM would be capable of 

managing for the protection and enhancement of the outstandingly remarkable values without 

acquiring any lands. However, if BLM seeks acquisition of this small parcel of private land 

in order to have a continuous 0.25-mile corridor, land prices are approximately $600 per acre. 
 National Wild & Scenic River Suitability Study 

 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 821 

The private parcel at the upstream end is owned by PPL Montana and is used for maintenance 

of the dam; acquisition is not likely. 

Lands upstream would not be available or necessary to purchase as property is part of an 

administrative site owned by PPL Montana for operations at the dam. This utility company 

provides for river launching at this site which would compliment the management of the WSR 

designation. The parcel downstream would not be necessary to purchase to protect resource 

values as the private land is under an easement which prohibits residential development. 

7. A determination of the degree to which the State or its political subdivision(s) might 

participate in the preservation and administration of the river should it be proposed for 

inclusion in the NWSRS: 

 MFWP would likely continue to manage for the recreational fisheries in this segment. This 

would be complimentary to the recreational outstandingly remarkable value that is linked to 

fishing opportunities. 

8. The Federal agency’s ability or other mechanisms to protect and manage the identified 

river related values other than WSR designation: 

The BLM is able to manage its lands along the west bank of the segment for the protection of 

identified river-related values through its RMP. The eastern bank is managed by the USFS, 

Helena National Forest. River designation would provide for common goals and management 

objectives for the two Federal agencies. 

9. An evaluation of the adequacy of local zoning and other land use controls in protecting 

the river’s outstandingly remarkable values by preventing incompatible development: 

This criterion is not applicable because all lands adjacent to this segment are Federallymanaged. 

10. Support or opposition to designation: 

This is the suitability study report. During the scoping period, no support or opposition to 

designation of this segment was submitted. The public review of the draft RMP would 

provide an opportunity for other agencies and the public to review the preliminary findings 

and voice opposition or support. 

11. Historical or existing rights that could be adversely affected with designation: 

There are no known historic or existing rights that would be adversely affected with 

designation. 

12. The consistency of designation with other agency plans, programs, or policies in meeting 

regional objectives: 

Designation of this segment would be consistent with the objectives of the BLM’s Butte 

RMP. 

Designation of this segment would compliment the fisheries and recreational goals of the 

MFWP. 

The USFS has not completed a suitability study for this segment. Designation would be 

consistent with the USFS eligibility determination, but successful management would depend 

on a similar suitability determination from USFS. 

13. The contribution to a river system, watershed, or basin integrity: 

Almost the entire flow in this segment is provided by releases from Hauser Dam. Only a 

small amount of water is added from the Beaver Creek tributary. This segment provides a 

very important contribution to the fisheries in the Missouri River watershed from Hauser Dam 

to Holter Dam downstream by providing important spawning habitat. 
Appendix I 

822 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 

Segment 3: Moose Creek 

Length within Planning Area: 4.0 miles (Figure 7) 

Tentative Classification: Scenic 

Proposed Boundary: Approximately 0.25-mile on from river bank on either side of the river. 

1. Characteristics that do or do not make the river a worthy addition to the NWSRS: 

Moose Creek contains outstandingly remarkable scenic and recreational values, as described 

in the eligibility section of this report, which make the river a worthy addition to the NWSRS. 

Moose Creek from the headwaters to the mouth of the creek at the Big Hole River is 

identified as water quality impaired on the MDEQ 303d list (MDEQ 2005). The probable 

causes of impairment are dewatering and flow alteration. The probable sources of impairment 

are agriculture and crop-related sources. There is extensive agriculture upstream of the 

eligible segment located on private land. The BLM does not have authority to regulate 

activities on these lands and is subject to receive water from these areas into Moose Creek. 

The creek is categorized as 4C – Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) are not required; no 

pollutant-related use impairment identified. As a result, no plan for improving water quality 

in this segment is being developed. 

2. The status of landownership, minerals, use in the area, including the amount of private 

land involved and associated or incompatible uses: 

The entire eligible segment is located on BLM land within the Humbug Spires WSA. 

Upstream of the eligible segment, Moose Creek passes through private land. The private land 

is predominantly used for cattle grazing. 

The area is currently used predominantly for recreational purposes such as hiking, camping, 

and providing access to climbing areas. These uses are compatible with the protection and 

enhancement of the segment’s outstandingly remarkable values. 

This segment has very low oil and gas potential. There are some known placer deposits along 

the creek and there is some limited potential for the discovery of lode gold deposits. There 

are no current mineral resource uses along this segment. 

3. Reasonably foreseeable potential uses of the land and related waters that would be 

enhanced, foreclosed, or curtailed if the area were included in the NWSRS and values 

that would be foreclosed or diminished if the area is not protected as part of the NWSRS: 

If the Humbug Spires WSA continues to be a WSA or becomes a designated Wilderness, 

reasonably foreseeable potential land uses would be compatible with the protection and 

enhancement of the segment’s outstandingly remarkable values. If the WSA designation is 

removed by Congress without designating it as Wilderness, then the area could be opened to 

an array of potential land uses. If the segment were designated as part of the NWSRS, cattle 

grazing would continue to not occur along this segment. 

Extraction of mineral in the area does not currently occur in accordance with the WSA 

designation. If the WSA designation were removed and the segment were designated in the 

NWSRS, mineral leasing and extraction would continue to be restricted. 

4. Federal or State agency that will administer the river should it be added to the NWSRS. 

The BLM, as the sole land manager, would administer the river should it be added to the 

NWSRS. 

5. Federal, State, Tribal, local, public, or other interest in designating or not designating the 

river, including the extent to which the agency proposes that administration of the river, 

including the costs thereof, be shared by state, local, or other agencies and individuals: 

The upstream landowner has not yet been contacted regarding this potential designation. It is 

expected that the landowner will review and comment on the suitability findings during the 

draft RMP review period. It is anticipated, given the necessity of the United States to acquire 

property or easements, that the landowner may be opposed to designation. Reasons for the 

necessity of acquisition are described in criteria 1 and 6. 
 National Wild & Scenic River Suitability Study 

 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 823 

6. Estimated cost to the United States for acquiring necessary lands, interests in lands, and 

administering the area should it be added to the NWSRS: 

To adequately address water quality impairment resulting from upstream land uses, the United 

States would need to acquire the upstream lands either in fee title or through conservation 

easements. It is not anticipated that the upstream landowners would be willing sellers. 

Without acquisition, dewatering and flow alteration problems would continue to affect the 

eligible segment, in addition to water quality problems associated with cattle grazing. The 

cost of acquisition would be a minimum of $500 per acre, requiring 690 acres to be acquired. 

One option would be within 1⁄4 mile of the stream for the entire length upstream of BLM, 

currently private to the USFS boundary. 

7. A determination of the degree to which the state or its political subdivision(s) might 

participate in the preservation and administration of the river should it be proposed for 

inclusion in the NWSRS: 

The land within the study corridor is entirely BLM administered. It is not anticipated that the 

State or its political subdivision would be required to participate in the administration of the 

river should it be proposed for inclusion in the NWSRS. 

8. The Federal agency’s ability or other mechanisms to protect and manage the identified 

river related values other than WSR designation: 

Protection and enhancement of the recreational and scenic outstandingly remarkable values 

are currently provided by the areas designation as a WSA. The management goals and 

objectives within the Humbug Spires WSA are compatible with management as an eligible 

segment. WSA designation is temporary. Congress has the ability to either designate the area 

as Wilderness under the Wilderness Act, or remove the WSA designation entirely. If WSA 

designation is removed, the area would be managed in accordance with the RMP. Removal of 

WSA designation, without making it a designated Wilderness area, could open the area to 

land uses such as timber harvest and mineral activity. Introduction of these land uses in the 

area could degrade the riparian corridor and result in impacts on the recreational and scenic 

outstandingly remarkable values that make the segment a worthy addition to the NWSRS. 

BLM does not have the authority to regulate land uses upstream of the eligible segment. 

Water quality problems resulting from cattle grazing activities upstream would continue to 

occur. 

9. An evaluation of the adequacy of local zoning and other land use controls in protecting 

the river’s outstandingly remarkable values by preventing incompatible development: 

Current local zoning and other land uses controls upstream of the eligible segment are not 

adequate to address the water quality issues. 

10. Support or opposition to designation: 

It is anticipated that the upstream landowner may be opposed to designation. Should the 

landowner provide comments either on the draft RMP or through direct communication with 

the BLM, this statement would be revised accordingly. 

11. Historical or existing rights that could be adversely affected with designation: 

There are no known historical or existing rights that could be adversely affected with 

designation. 

12. The consistency of designation with other agency plans, programs, or policies in meeting 

regional objectives: 

Designation would be consistent with current management prescriptions as a WSA and with 

the Butte RMP. 

13. The contribution to a river system, watershed, or basin integrity: 

Below the eligible segment, Moose Creek flows for several miles before entering the Big 

Hole River at Maiden Rock. Water in Moose Creek contributes to the water quality and 

quantity of the Big Hole River system. 
Appendix I 

824 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 

Segment 4: Muskrat Creek 

Length within Planning Area: 2.6 miles (Figure 8) 

Tentative Classification: Scenic 

Proposed Boundary: Approximately 0.25-mile on from river bank on either side of the river. 

1. Characteristics that do or do not make the river a worthy addition to the NWSRS: 

Muskrat Creek contains fisheries outstandingly remarkable values related to its population of 

genetically pure westslope cutthroat trout. MFWP, BLM, and USFS have actively removed 

eastern brook trout and have installed a barrier downstream to prevent non-westslope 

cutthroat trout from migrating into the segment. 

The high-quality riparian corridor provides critical winter habitat for elk and serves as a 

migration corridor for elk, moose, and bear. 

Water Quality 

Muskrat Creek from its headwaters to the mouth at the Boulder River has been identified as 

water quality impaired on the MDEQ 303d list (MDEQ 2005). However, there is some 

discrepancy between the MDEQ assessment and current conditions within the segment. The 

303d list identifies the creek as not supporting aquatic life or coldwater fisheries or as a 

drinking water supply. The probable causes listed are copper, lead, metals, and other habitat 

alterations. Probable sources are listed as agriculture (grazing-related sources), and resource 

extraction (abandoned mines). There is no agriculture occurring either within or upstream of 

the eligible segment. An abandoned mine (Iron Mine) is located upslope of the headwaters of 

Muskrat Creek near Elkhorn Peak. The data used for the 303d assessment includes the 

following note: Iron Mine sediment samples were not obtained from Muskrat Creek substrate, 

but were obtained in the headwaters uplands (MDEQ 2005). It appears that the metals 

contamination listed has not been observed within the creek sediments, but rather is found 

upslope of the headwaters. Muskrat Creek is scheduled for a TMDL to address water quality 

issues between 2008 and 2012. 

Based on BLM field observations, the eligible segment does not have the water quality issues 

described above and is capable of supporting aquatic life and coldwater fisheries. Data has 

not been collected to determine if the segment would be a suitable drinking water supply. 

Current conditions in the segment include significant habitat for westslope cutthroat trout, as 

described in the eligibility section of this report. MFWP, BLM, and USFS are collaborating 

to conserve westslope cutthroat trout within this segment and upstream on the USFS land. 

Measurements of pH have been taken at several points within the eligible segment and the 

results (7.3 to 10) indicate that the area is not contaminated with heavy metals. In addition, 

BLM has begun conducting invertebrate surveys and has found healthy populations indicative 

of good water quality. Water quality impairment may be an issue downstream of the eligible 

segment where the creek enters agricultural areas. 

Invasive species are present within the corridor, as they are virtually everywhere. Some small 

patches of yellow toadflax (Linaria vulgaris) were observed along the trail. In addition, 

patches of trees were observed to be infected with mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus 

ponderosae). 

2. The status of landownership, minerals, use in the area, including the amount of private 

land involved and associated or incompatible uses: 

All land within 0.25-mile of the eligible segment is Federally-managed. BLM manages lands 

on both sides of the creek for the entire length (Figure 8). Lands both upstream and 

downstream of the eligible segment are managed by the USFS, Deerlodge National Forest. 

This segment has very low oil and gas potential. There are some known placer occurrences 

along the creek and there is some limited potential for the discovery of lode gold deposits. 

There are no current mineral resource uses along this segment. 

3. Reasonably foreseeable potential uses of the land and related waters that would be 

enhanced, foreclosed, or curtailed if the area were included in the NWSRS and values 

that would be foreclosed or diminished if the area is not protected as part of the NWSRS: 
 National Wild & Scenic River Suitability Study 

 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 825 

The area would continue to be available for mountain biking, hiking, horseback riding, and 

dispersed camping. Foreclosing or curtailing these activities as a result of designation is not 

anticipated. 

Current management does not permit mining within the study corridor. Historic mining (Iron 

Mine) occurred up slope of the headwaters on USFS land. 

4. Federal or State agency that will administer the river should it be added to the NWSRS. 

The eligible segment would be administered by BLM should it be added to the NWSRS. 

5. Federal, State, Tribal, local, public, or other interest in designating or not designating the 

river, including the extent to which the agency proposes that administration of the river, 

including the costs thereof, be shared by state, local, or other agencies and individuals: 

The USFS manages land upstream and downstream of the eligible segment. The USFS did not 

find either the segments on its land eligible for inclusion in the NWSRS. 

6. Estimated cost to the United States of acquiring necessary lands, interests in lands, and 

administering the area should it be added to the NWSRS: 

Acquisition of land or interests in lands would not be necessary. 

7. A determination of the degree to which the State or its political subdivision(s) might 

participate in the preservation and administration of the river should it be proposed for 

inclusion in the NWSRS: 

MFWP is actively involved in a westslope cutthroat trout restoration program with the BLM 

and USFS in this segment. It is expected that their involvement in the protection and 

enhancement of the fisheries outstandingly remarkable values would continue. 

8. The Federal agency’s ability or other mechanisms to protect and manage the identified 

river related values other than WSR designation: 

The surrounding USFS land is managed as the Elkhorn Wildlife Management Unit. BLM has 

a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with USFS to manage the lands surrounding the 

eligible segment for the benefit of recreation and wildlife, including fisheries. Management in 

accordance with the MOU is compatible with the protection and enhancement of the fisheries 

outstandingly remarkable value. No timber harvest or mining is permitted within the study 

corridor or within the Elkhorns WSA. Although current management is compatible with the 

protection of the outstandingly remarkable values, the time frame of these management goals 

are limited to the expiration of the MOU and subject to RMP amendments. Designation into 

the NWSRS would more permanently protect these values. 

9. An evaluation of the adequacy of local zoning and other land use controls in protecting 

the river’s outstandingly remarkable values by preventing incompatible development: 

Local zoning and other land use controls do not pertain to this segment because it is entirely 

located on Federal lands. 

10. Support or opposition to designation: 

This is the suitability study report. During the scoping period, no support or opposition to 

designation of this segment was submitted. The public review of the draft RMP would 

provide an opportunity for other agencies and the public to review the preliminary findings 

and voice opposition or support. 

11. Historical or existing rights that could be adversely affected with designation: 

There are no known historical or existing rights that would be adversely affected by 

designation. 

12. The consistency of designation with other agency plans, programs, or policies in meeting 

regional objectives: 

Designation would be consistent with the Butte BLM RMP and the MOU with the USFS 

regarding management of this segment. A non-motorized hiking trail exists along the creek 

and is currently managed by the USFS under a BLM right-of-way. 
Appendix I 

826 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 

13. The contribution to a river system, watershed, or basin integrity: 

Muskrat Creek flows into the Boulder River. 

 

PRELIMINARY SUITABILITY DETERMINATION SUMMARY 

Two of the four eligible segments were determined suitable for inclusion in the NWSRS. 

Below is a brief summary of each of the four segments. 

Segment 1: Upper Big Hole River 

This segment contains outstandingly remarkable recreational and fisheries values. The 

recreational values include readily accessible camping and fishing opportunities in a section 

rated as a Class I, Blue Ribbon Fisheries. The fisheries values include a population of BLM 

sensitive Montana arctic grayling. The segment supports high quality grayling habitat on the 

Big Hole River and lacks the high-density populations of rainbow and brown trout, which 

compete with grayling. The segment meets the tentative classification as a Recreational river 

due to the presence of a road parallel to the segment. There are several physical and 

management challenges associated with this segment. BLM control of water quality within 

the segment is somewhat limited. Upstream of the segment is a small state-owned parcel 

(approximately 0.25-mile) followed by extensive private land holdings. Without acquisition 

of private lands, the Federal government would have very little control over the potential 

water quality impacts related from private land uses such as grazing. Within the segment, the 

ford and grazing create potential water quality impacts. The BLM could more restrictively 

manage these land uses to further protect water quality. The largest management challenge 

could arise as a result of inclusion of this segment in the NWSRS. Designation in the 

NWSRS would bring national recognition to this relatively small (2.3-mile) section of the Big 

Hole River. Increased use of this segment would alter the recreational experiences that are 

currently identified as outstandingly remarkable. The dispersed camping opportunities would 

not be feasible with increased use given the small amount of BLM land between the road and 

the river and the important riparian areas. Consequently, it is likely BLM would have to 

institute more restrictive management measures regarding recreation in the area or develop 

campsites and provide facilities. These changes would alter the values currently associated 

with the segment. As a result, this segment has been determined not suitable for designation 

as a Recreational river within the NWSRS. 

Segment 2: Missouri River (Hauser Dam to Upper Holter Lake) 

This segment contains outstandingly remarkable recreational, wildlife, and scenic values. The 

segment, which is primarily accessible by boat, is rated as a Class I, Blue Ribbon Fisheries, 

attracting national and international anglers. The river corridor provides significant habitat for 

bald eagle, osprey, golden eagle, peregrine falcon and bighorn sheep. Bald and golden eagle, 

osprey, and peregrine falcon depend upon the fisheries for food and the riparian corridor for 

nesting and perching habitats. Big horn sheep primarily use the river corridor for water and 

forage. Although flows are controlled by Canyon Ferry and to a lesser degree Hauser Dam, 

the FERC license requires adequate flows for fisheries habitat. These required flows maintain 

the free-flowing nature of the segment and provide flows suitable for the protection of the 

recreational, wildlife, and scenic outstandingly remarkable values. The segment meets 

classification criteria as Scenic because there is limited access to the segment, no parallel 

roads and development along the segment is limited to the Beaver Creek parking area and a 

pit toilet maintained by the USFS. Some dispersed camping occurs along the segment, but 

there are no developed sites. Due to the Beaver Creek parking area and pit toilet, both visible 

from the river, this segment is not designated as Wild because it does not meet the criteria that 

shoreline development be primitive. Designation of this segment as Scenic would result in 

minimal changes to existing management but would result in legislatively protecting the 

riparian corridor and provide a common goal for BLM and USFS coordination of the 

segment. As of this report, the USFS has found this segment to be eligible for inclusion in the 

NWSRS but has not completed a suitability study of the segment (Helena National Forest 

1989). Because the BLM manages one side of the river and the USFS manages the other, 

successful management of this segment depends on cooperative management between the 

BLM and USFS. This segment has been determined preliminarily suitable for designation 
 National Wild & Scenic River Suitability Study 

 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 827 

as a Scenic river within the NWSRS. Because successful management of this segment 

depends on coordination with the USFS, the final BLM suitability determination will be 

deferred until the USFS completes a suitability study of this segment. 

Segment 3: Moose Creek (segment within Humbug Spires WSA) 

This segment contains outstandingly remarkable recreational and scenic values. The 

recreational values are related to the hiking, fishing, and primitive camping opportunities 

including providing a scenic hiking trail that provides access to the Humbug Spires for rock 

climbing. The scenic values are related to the variety of color patterns and habitats within the 

river corridor, which change from meandering through meadows, to wooded, to cascading 

boulders, returning to meadow at the upstream end. In addition, at several locations along the 

creek, generous views of the spires are available. The entire segment is located within the 

Humbug Spires WSA with access limited to the trailhead located at the downstream end of 

the segment. A hiking trail parallels the creek for the lower third; the upper two-thirds are 

accessible only by bushwhacking, as no trail exists. The primary characteristic making this 

segment not worthy of designation is water quality. The segment is listed as water quality 

impaired by the MDEQ 303d list, and there is no restoration plan in place or planned for 

development. The causes of water quality impairment are related to private land uses 

upstream of the eligible segment. Federal agencies, including BLM, do not have authority to 

regulate these land uses. In order, to remedy the water quality issues, the BLM would need to 

acquire these lands or an interest in the lands (through easement) along the river corridor. 

Such acquisition would be fairly expensive, and likely against the wishes of the landowner. 

Protection of the recreational and scenic outstandingly remarkable values within the BLM 

authority is currently provided by the WSA designation. However, the protections afforded by 

WSA designation are dependent upon the continued WSA designation or legislative action to 

formally designate the area as Wilderness under the Wilderness Act. Removal of WSA 

designation could result in the introduction of commodity based land uses, which could 

impact the recreational and scenic values of this segment. As a result of the water quality 

issues, this segment has been determined not suitable for inclusion in the NWSRS. 

Segment 4: Muskrat Creek 

This segment contains outstandingly remarkable fisheries values related to its population of 

westslope cutthroat trout. Muskrat Creek, through the efforts of BLM, MFWP, and USFS, is 

considered to have a healthy genetically pure westslope cutthroat trout population. The highquality riparian habitat provides critical winter elk habitat and a migration corridor for elk, 

moose and bear. The only potential detracting characteristic of this segment is related to 

water quality. A trail parallels the segment for its entire length. The only development along 

this segment consists of a small wooden footbridge located approximately 1.5 miles upstream 

from the trailhead. Remnants of another small footbridge were observed near the upstream 

end of the segment. The MDEQ has listed Muskrat Creek including the eligible segment as 

water quality impaired and is developing a TMDL to restore water quality. However, 

observations within this segment show no evidence of water quality impairment. Further 

investigation is necessary for confirmation, but it appears that the segment may need to be 

removed from the 303d list. Designation of this segment would result in minimal changes 

from current management but would ensure protection of the fisheries values through 

legislative designation. This segment has been determined suitable for designation as a 

Scenic river within the NWSRS. If further examination determines that the segment has 

good water quality, and is subsequently removed from the MDEQ 303d list, the segment 

would be suitable for designation as a Wild river within the NWSRS. This suitability study 

has examined only the portion of Muskrat Creek on BLM land as a stand alone segment. The 

USFS manages portions of Muskrat Creek both upstream and downstream of this segment 

which may also be suitable for designation. If the USFS completes an eligibility and 

suitability determination, the total length of the segment worthy for designation within the 

NWSRS may increase. 

INTERIM MANAGEMENT 

Interim protection for preliminarily suitable segments is described in Appendix C. 
Appendix I 

828 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 

Missouri River 

Current BLM management of this segment is sufficient to protect the free-flowing nature and 

outstandingly remarkable values within BLM’s authority that make this segment suitable for 

designation as a Scenic river in the NWSRS. Successful long-term management of this 

segment needs to be closely coordinated with the USFS, which manages the opposite 

shoreline. 

Muskrat Creek 

Current BLM management of this segment is sufficient to protect the free-flowing nature and 

outstandingly remarkable fisheries values that make this segment suitable for designation 

within the NWSRS. Continued coordination with USFS and MFWP would be critical to 

maintain the genetic purity of westslope cutthroat trout in the segment. Although it appears 

that heavy metals from the abandoned Iron Mine are not reaching the creek, an assessment of 

potential impact should be conducted. It may be necessary to take additional protective 

measures to ensure that contamination does not occur. 

Although the Upper Big Hole River and Missouri River segments were preliminarily found 

not suitable, if an alternative is chosen that includes these segments as being recommended 

suitable, protective management would apply. 
 National Wild & Scenic River Suitability Study 

 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 829 

REFERENCES 

BLM (U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management). 1979. Management Framework Plan, Dillon 

Summary, Montana. BLM, Montana. September 1979. 

. 1984. Headwaters Resource Area Resource Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement, Butte 

District, Montana. BLM, Butte District, Montana. 

. 1986. Bureau of Land Management Handbook, H-8410-1, Visual Resource Inventory, January 17, 1986. 

. 1992. Wild and Scenic Rivers—Policy and Program Direction for Identification, Evaluation, and 

Management. BLM Manual 8351. Rel. 8-61, May 19, 1992. BLM, Washington DC. 

. 2003. Wild and Scenic Rivers—Policy and Program Direction for Identification, Evaluation, and 

Management. Changes made to original Manual Section 8351. BLM, Washington, DC. 

. 2004a. Instruction Memorandum No. 2004-196, Clarification of Policy in the BLM Manual Section 8351, 

Wild and Scenic Rivers, with Respect to Eligibility Criteria and Protective Management. June 21, 2004. BLM, 

Washington, DC. 

. 2004b. Butte BLM Field Office rivers and streams GIS, received from Barbara O’Neill, Butte BLM GIS 

Specialist, via CD-ROM to Angie Nelson, Tetra Tech, Inc. June 17, 2004. 

. Undated. Humbug Spires Wilderness Instant Study Area. Draft Suitability Report and Environmental Impact 

Statement. DOI, BLM. 

Helena National Forest (U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Forest Service, Helena National Forest). 1989. 

Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact, Wild and Scenic Rivers Eligibility Study. USDA Forest 

Service, Helena National Forest, Helena, Montana. 11 pages plus maps. 

. 2004. Helena National Forest, Land and Resource Management Plan, Amendment No. 2, April 1989. Internet 

Web site: http://www.fs.fed.us/r1/helena/planning/number2.html. Accessed on June 2, 2004. 

Huntington, M.H., and J.D. Echeverria. 1991. The American Rivers Outstanding Rivers List. American Rivers, Inc. 

Washington, D.C. 

MFWP (Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks). 2004a. MFWP Stream Fishery Classification, 1999 Final Sport Fisheries 

Value, Class I and II Streams. Internet Web site: http://www.fwp.state.mt.us/fishing/class1and2.pdf. Accessed 

on June 2, 2004. 

. 2004b. Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan. Internet Web site: 

http://www.fwp.state.mt.us/parks/scorp/default.asp. Accessed on June 2, 2004. 

Montana Chapter of the American Fisheries Society. 2004. Montana's Fish Species of Special Concern, Westslope 

Cutthroat Trout. Internet Web site: 

http://www.fisheries.org/AFSmontana/SSCpages/westslope_cutthroat_trout.htm. Accessed on June 15, 2004. 

MDEQ (Montana Department of Environmental Quality). 2005. Environet – Water Quality Information. 2004 Draft 

2004 303d Information. Internet Web site: http://maps2.nris.state.mt.us/wis/TMDLApp/TMDLReport2004.asp. 

Accessed on September 1, 2005. 

NPS (U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service). 2004. Rivers and Trails Conservation Assistance Program. 

Nationwide Rivers Inventory – Montana Segments. Internet Web site: 

http://www.nps.gov/ncrc/programs/rtca/nri/states/mt.html. Accessed on May 19, 2004. 
Appendix I 

830 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 

GLOSSARY 

ELIGIBLE RIVER SEGMENT. A section of a river that qualifies for inclusion in the National 

Wild and Scenic River System through determination that it is free-flowing and with its 

adjacent land area possessing at least one river-related value considered to be outstandingly 

remarkable. 

PLANNING AREA. The geographical area for which land use and resource management plans 

are developed and maintained. 

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN (RMP). A land use plan that establishes land use 

allocations, multiple-use guidelines, and management objectives for a given planning area. 

The BLM has used the RMP planning system since about 1980. 

SUITABLE RIVER. A river segment found, through administrative study by an appropriate 

agency, to meet the criteria for designation as a component of the National Wild and Scenic 

Rivers system, specified in Section 4(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. 
 National Wild & Scenic River Suitability Study 

 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 831 

APPENDIX A 

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA 

INTRODUCTION 

For the purpose of classification, a river area may be divided into segments. For example, 

changes in river character, such as the presence of dams and reservoirs, significant changes in 

types or amounts of development, significant changes in physiographic character, tributaries, 

or features, and/or significant changes in land status, should be considered in identifying river 

segments for evaluation. Management strategies necessary to administer the entire river area 

should also be taken into account. As such, excessive segmentation should be avoided. Each 

segment, considered as a whole, needs to conform to either the Wild, Scenic, or Recreational 

classification. There are no specific requirements for segment length. Congress has designated 

a segment as short as four miles. A river segment is of sufficient length if a specific 

outstandingly remarkable value or values can be protected (a factor in the suitability 

determination, not eligibility determination), should the segment be designated. An entire 

stream could be one segment. 

Each identified river segment in the RMP planning area must be evaluated to determine 

whether or not it is eligible for inclusion in the NWSRS. To be eligible, a river segment must 

be “free-flowing” and must possess at least one “outstandingly remarkable” value. Freeflowing means “existing or flowing in a natural condition without impoundment, diversion, 

straightening, rip-rapping, or other modification of the water.” Please note the following: 

• A river below a dam or impoundment can still be eligible; 

• A river need not be navigable by water craft in order to be eligible; and 

• There are no specific requirements concerning the flow of an eligible river segment. 

Flows are sufficient if they sustain or complement the outstandingly remarkable 

values for which the segment would be designated. As such, intermittent and 

ephemeral streams can be eligible. 

OUTSTANDINGLY REMARKABLE VALUES 

The determination of whether a river area contains “outstandingly remarkable” values is a 

professional judgment and needs to be documented in the study report. In order to be 

considered as outstandingly remarkable, a river-related value must be a unique, rare, or 

exemplary feature that is significant at a comparative regional or national scale. While the 

spectrum of resources that may be considered is broad, all values should be directly river 

related. That is, they should have the following characteristics: 

• Be located in the river or on its immediate shorelands (for the purposes of this study, 

the preliminary boundary is 0.25 mile on either side of the river); 

• Contribute substantially to the functioning of the river ecosystem; or 

• Owe their location or existence to the presence of the river. 

The following are general guidelines for the outstandingly remarkable values for which river 

segments can be eligible. Only one such value is needed for eligibility. 

SCENIC 

The landscape elements of landform, vegetation, water, color, and related factors result in 

notable or exemplary visual features or attractions. When analyzing scenic values, additional 

factors, such as seasonal variations in vegetation, scale of cultural modifications, and the 

length of time negative intrusions are viewed, may be considered. Scenery and visual 

attractions may be highly diverse over most of the river or river segment. 
Appendix I 

832 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 

RECREATIONAL

Recreational opportunities are or have the potential to be popular enough to attract visitors 

from throughout or beyond the region of comparison or are unique or rare within the region. 

Visitors are willing to travel long distances to use the river resources for recreational 

purposes. River-related opportunities could include, but are not limited to, sightseeing, 

wildlife observation, camping, photography, hiking, fishing and boating. 

• Interpretive opportunities may be exceptional and may attract or have the potential to 

attract visitors from outside the region of comparison. 

• The river may provide or have the potential to provide settings for national or 

regional usage or competitive events. 

GEOLOGICAL

The river, or the area within the river corridor, contains one or more examples of a geologic 

feature, process, or phenomenon that are unique or rare within the region of comparison. The 

features may be in an unusually active stage of development, represent a textbook example, or 

represent a unique or rare combination of geologic features (erosional, volcanic, glacial, or 

other geologic structures). 

FISH 

Fish values may be judged on the relative merits of either fish populations or habitat or a 

combination of the following river-related conditions: 

• Populations. The river is nationally or regionally one of the top producers of 

resident, indigenous, or anadromous fish species. Of particular significance may be 

the presence of wild or unique stocks or populations of state- or US-listed or 

candidate threatened and endangered species. 

• Habitat. The river provides exceptionally high quality habitat for fish species 

indigenous to the region. Of particular significance is habitat for state- or US-listed 

or candidate threatened and endangered species. 

WILDLIFE 

Wildlife values may be judged on the relative merits of either wildlife populations or habitat, 

or a combination of the following conditions: 

• Populations. The river or area within the river corridor contains nationally or 

regionally important populations of resident or indigenous wildlife species dependent 

on the river environment. Of particular significance may be species considered to be 

unique or populations of state- or US-listed or candidate threatened and endangered 

species. 

• Habitat. The river or area within the river corridor provides exceptionally high 

quality habitat for wildlife of national or regional significance or may provide unique 

habitat or a critical link in habitat conditions for state- or US-listed or candidate 

threatened and endangered species. Contiguous habitat conditions are such that the 

biological needs of the species are met. 

CULTURAL 

The river or area within the river corridor contains a site or sites where there is evidence of 

occupation or use by Native Americans. Sites must be rare or must have unusual 

characteristics or exceptional human-interest values. Sites may have national or regional 

importance for interpreting prehistory; may be rare; may represent an area where culture or a 

cultural period was first identified and described; may have been used concurrently by two or 

more cultural groups; or may have been used by cultural groups for rare or sacred purposes. 

HISTORIC 

The river or area within the river corridor contains a site or sites or feature or features 

associated with a significant event, an important person, or a cultural activity of the past that 

was rare or unusual in the region. A historic site or feature in most cases is 50 years old or 
 National Wild & Scenic River Suitability Study 

 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 833 

older. Sites or features listed in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic 

Places may be of particular significance. 

OTHER SIMILAR VALUES 

While no specific evaluation guidelines have been developed for the other similar values 

category, additional values deemed relevant to the eligibility of the river segment should be 

considered in a manner consistent with the foregoing guidance, including, but not limited to, 

hydrologic, ecologic/biologic diversity, paleontologic, botanic, and scientific study 

opportunities. 
Appendix I 

834 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 

APPENDIX B 

CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA FOR WILD, SCENIC, AND 

RECREATIONAL RIVER AREAS 

Table B-1 

Classification Criteria for Wild, Scenic, and Recreational River Areas 

Attribute Wild Scenic Recreational 

Water 

Resources 

Development 

(impoundments, 

diversions, etc.) 

Free of impoundment Free of impoundment Some existing impoundment or 

diversion. 

The existence of low dams, 

diversions, riprap, or other 

modifications of the waterway is 

acceptable, provided the 

waterway remains generally 

natural and riverine in 

appearance. 

Shoreline 

Development 

Essentially primitive. Little or no 

evidence of human activity. 

The presence of a few 

inconspicuous structures, 

particularly those of historic or 

cultural value, is acceptable. 

A limited amount of domestic 

livestock grazing or hay 

production is acceptable. 

Little or no evidence of past 

timber harvest. No ongoing 

timber harvest. 

Largely primitive and 

undeveloped. No substantial 

evidence of human activity. 

The presence of small 

communities or dispersed 

dwellings or farm structures is 

acceptable. 

The presence of grazing, hay 

production, or row crops is 

acceptable. 

Evidence of past or ongoing 

timber harvest is acceptable, 

provided the forest appears 

natural from the riverbank. 

Some development. Substantial 

evidence of human activity. 

The presence of extensive 

residential development and a 

few commercial structures is 

acceptable. 

Lands may have been developed 

for the full range of agricultural 

and forestry uses. 

May show evidence of past and 

ongoing timber harvest. 

Table B-1 

Classification Criteria for Wild, Scenic, and Recreational River Areas (continued) 

Attribute Wild Scenic Recreational

Accessibility Generally inaccessible except by 

trail. 

No roads, railroads, or other 

provision for vehicular travel 

within the river area. A few 

existing roads leading to the 

boundary of the river area is 

acceptable. 

Accessible in places by road. 

Roads may occasionally reach or 

bridge the river. The existence of 

short stretches of conspicuous or 

longer stretches of 

inconspicuous roads or railroads 

is acceptable. 

Readily accessible by road or 

railroad. 

The existence of parallel roads 

or railroads on one or both 

banks, as well as bridge 

crossings and other river access 

points, including fords, is 

acceptable. 

Water Quality Meets or exceeds Federal criteria 

or Federally approved state 

standards for aesthetics, for 

propagation of fish and wildlife 

normally adapted to the habitat 

of the river, and for primary 

contact recreation (swimming), 

except where exceeded by 

natural conditions. 

No criteria prescribed by the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. The 

Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 have 

made it a national goal that all waters of the United States be made 

fishable and swimmable. Therefore, rivers will not be precluded from 

scenic or recreational classification because of poor water quality at 

the time of their study, provided a water quality improvement plan 

exists or is being developed in compliance with applicable Federal 

and state laws. 

Source: Federal Register. National Wild and Scenic Rivers System; Final Revised Guidelines for Eligibility, Classification, and

Management of River Areas. Section 1(3), Vol. 47, No. 173, page 39461. September 7, 1982. 
 National Wild & Scenic River Suitability Study 

 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 835 

APPENDIX C 

INTERIM PROTECTION FOR CANDIDATE WILD AND SCENIC 

RIVERS 

 Table C-1 

Interim Protection for Candidate Wild and Scenic Rivers 

Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, Section 5(d)(1)1

Issue/Action Eligible2 Suitable

Study Boundary Minimum of 0.25-mile from ordinary 

high-water mark. 

Boundary may include adjacent areas 

needed to protect identified values. 

Minimum of 0.25-mile from ordinary 

high-water mark. 

Boundary may include adjacent areas 

needed to protect identified values. 

Preliminary Classification Section 2(b): 

3 classes: Wild, scenic, recreational, 

defined by statute. 

Criteria for classification described in 

Interagency Guidelines. 

Manage at preliminary classification. 

Section 2(b): 

3 classes: Wild, scenic, recreational, 

defined by statute. 

Criteria for classification described in 

Interagency Guidelines. 

Manage at preliminary classification. 

Study Report Review Procedures Notice of study report/draft EA3

published in Federal Register. 

Comments/response from Federal, 

state, and local agencies and the public 

included in the study report/final EA4

transmitted to the President and 

Congress. 
Appendix I 

836 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 

Table C-1 

Interim Protection for Candidate Wild and Scenic Rivers (continued)

Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, Section 5(d)(1)1

Issue/Action Eligible2 Suitable 

Private Land 

*Administration 

*Acquisition 

Affect private land uses through 

voluntary partnership with state/local 

governments and landowners. 

No regulatory authority. 

No ability to acquire interest in land 

under the Act’s authority prior to 

designation. 

Affect private land uses through 

voluntary partnership with state/local 

governments and landowners. 

No regulatory authority. 

No ability to acquire interest in land 

under the act’s authority prior to 

designation. 

Typically an evaluation of the 

adequacy of local zoning and land use 

controls is a component of suitability 

determination5

. 

Water Resources Project River’s free-flowing condition 

protected to the extent of other agency 

authorities; not protected under the act. 

River’s free-flowing condition 

protected to the extent of other agency 

authorities; not protected under the act. 

Land Disposition Agency discretion to retain lands 

within river corridor in Federal 

ownership. 

Agency discretion to retain lands 

within river corridor in Federal 

ownership. 

Mining and Mineral Leasing Protect free flow, water quality, and 

outstandingly remarkable values 

through other agency authorities. 

Protect free flow, water quality, and 

outstandingly remarkable values 

through other agency authorities. 

Actions of Other Agencies Affect actions of other agencies 

through voluntary partnership. 

Affect actions of other agencies 

through voluntary partnership. 

Protect Outstandingly Remarkable 

Values 

No regulatory authority conferred by 

the act; agency protects through other 

authorities. 

Section 11(b) 1: 

Limited financial or other assistance to 

encourage participation in the 

acquisition, protection, and 

management of river resources6. 

No regulatory authority conferred by 

the act; agency protects through other 

authorities. 

Section 11(b) 1: 

Limited financial or other assistance to 

encourage participation in the 

acquisition, protection, and 

management of river resources6. 

1 Agency-identified study rivers as directed by Section 5(d)(1) of the act. 

2

 A number of sources are available for identifying rivers under Section 5(d)(1). Under a Presidential Directive issued in 1979, each Federal 

agency, as part of its normal planning and environmental review processes, is required to avoid or mitigate adverse effects on rivers in the 

National Rivers Inventory. 

3

 Draft environmental assessment 

4 Final environmental assessment 

5

 For an agency-identified study river that includes private lands, there is often the need to evaluate existing state and local land use controls 

and, if necessary, to assess the willingness of state and local government to protect river values. 

6 Section 11(b)1 authorizes the Secretary of the Interior and Secretary of Agriculture or the head of any other Federal agency to provide for 

“limited financial or other assistance to encourage participation in the acquisition, protection, and management of river resources.” This 

authority “applies within or outside a Federally administered area and applies to rivers which are components of the National Wild and 

Scenic Rivers System and to other rivers.” The recipients of Federal assistance include states or their political subdivisions, landowners, 

private organizations, or individuals. Some examples of assistance under this section include, but are not limited to, riparian restoration, 

riparian fencing to protect water quality and riparian vegetation, of vegetative screening to enhance scenery/recreation experience. 
 National Wild & Scenic River Suitability Study 

 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 837 

APPENDIX D 

RIVER SEGMENTS FROM INITIAL IDENTIFICATION EFFORTS 

Table D-1 lists the Planning Area river and stream segments considered during initial identification efforts for the Wild 

and Scenic Rivers study process. 
Appendix I 

838 Butte Draft RMP/EIS Table D-1 River Segments from Initial Identification Efforts Outstandingly Remarkable Values Determination River Segment Total Segment Length (miles) Length on BLM- administered Lands (miles) Free Flowing 

Scenic 

Recreation 

Geological 

Fish 

Wildlife 

Historic 

Cultural 

Other Not Eligible Eligible 

Big Hole River 15.20 6.96 X segment 1 0.39 X segment 2 0.34 X segment 3 0.79 X segment 4 0.16 X segment 5 0.95 X segment 6 0.40 X segment 7 0.28 X segment 8 2.30 Yes X X X segment 9 0.73 X segment 10 0.26 X segment 11 0.15 X segment 12 0.21 X Big Pipestone Creek 5.57 3.26 X Blackfoot River 2.22 1.90 X segment 1 1.62 X segment 2 0.28 X Boulder River 8.74 3.76 X segment 1 0.03 X segment 2 0.06 X segment 3 0.17 X segment 4 0.27 X segment 5 1.48 X 
 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 839

Table D-1 River Segments from Initial Identification Efforts (continued) Outstandingly Remarkable Values Determination River Segment Total Segment Length (miles) Length on BLM- administered Lands (miles) Free Flowing 

Scenic 

Recreation 

Geological 

Fish 

Wildlife 

Historic 

Cultural 

Other Not Eligible Eligible 

segment 6 0.13 X segment 7 0.91 X segment 8 0.71 X Cabin Creek 2.51 2.51 X Camp Creek 10.74 5.34 X segment 1 1.58 X segment 2 3.76 X Cataract Creek 1.88 0.37 X segment 1 0.06 X segment 2 0.25 X segment 3 0.06 X Charcoal Creek 1.77 1.31 X segment 1 1.13 X segment 2 0.18 X Chicken Gulch 2.09 2.09 X Clark Gulch 2.20 1.07 X Cline Gulch 1.38 1.34 X Confederate Gulch 5.43 3.28 X segment 1 0.85 X segment 2 0.36 X segment 3 0.16 X segment 4 1.06 X segment 5 0.11 X 
Appendix I 

840 Butte Draft RMP/EIS Table D-1 River Segments from Initial Identification Efforts (continued) Outstandingly Remarkable Values Determination River Segment Total Segment Length (miles) Length on BLM- administered Lands (miles) Free Flowing 

Scenic 

Recreation 

Geological 

Fish 

Wildlife 

Historic 

Cultural 

Other Not Eligible Eligible 

segment 6 0.63 X segment 7 0.11 X Connor Gulch 1.11 1.11 X Crow Creek 1.04 1.04 X DemiJohn Gulch 1.94 1.94 X Dry Creek 6.16 7.50 X segment 1 2.46 X segment 2 0.99 0.99 X segment 3 1.10 1.10 X segment 4 1.81 X segment 5 1.14 X Falls Gulch 1.54 1.54 X Fish Creek 1.40 0.91 X segment 1 0.61 X segment 2 0.30 X Fitz Creek 1.73 0.91 X Gold Run Creek 1.02 1.02 X Granite Creek 1.14 1.14 X Greenhorn Creek 2.15 0.59 X segment 1 0.27 X segment 2 0.32 X Hay Canyon 1.17 1.17 X 
 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 841

Table D-1 River Segments from Initial Identification Efforts (continued) Outstandingly Remarkable Values Determination River Segment Total Segment Length (miles) Length on BLM- administered Lands (miles) Free Flowing 

Scenic 

Recreation 

Geological 

Fish 

Wildlife 

Historic 

Cultural 

Other Not Eligible Eligible 

High Ore Creek 5.22 2.19 X segment 1 0.15 X segment 2 1.01 X segment 3 0.15 X segment 4 0.07 X segment 5 0.07 X segment 6 0.56 X segment 7 0.19 X Homestake Creek 2.21 2.21 X Horse Gulch 2.43 2.43 X Indian Creek 9.30 6.73 X segment 1 1.10 Xsegment 2 0.85 Xsegment 3 3.67 Xsegment 4 1.10 Xsegment 5* 9.10 X XJackson Creek 2.98 0.50 X segment 1 0.39 X segment 2 0.11 X Jimmie New Creek 1.87 1.87 X Johnny Gulch 8.14 5.18 X segment 1 0.29 X segment 2 0.31 X 
Appendix I 

842 Butte Draft RMP/EIS Table D-1 River Segments from Initial Identification Efforts (continued) Outstandingly Remarkable Values Determination River Segment Total Segment Length (miles) Length on BLM- administered Lands (miles) Free Flowing 

Scenic 

Recreation 

Geological 

Fish 

Wildlife 

Historic 

Cultural 

Other Not Eligible Eligible 

segment 3 0.68 X segment 4 0.58 X segment 5 0.24 X segment 6 1.47 X segment 7 1.01 X segment 8 0.34 X segment 9 0.27 X Keating Gulch 6.39 1.24 X segment 1 0.09 X segment 2 0.28 X segment 3 0.08 X segment 4 0.11 X segment 5 0.41 X segment 6 0.27 0.27 X Little Prickly Pear Creek 5.49 3.52 X segment 1 3.05 X segment 2 0.47 X Little Whitetail Creek 4.17 2.12 X segment 1 1.41 X segment 2 0.71 X 
 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 843

Table D-1 River Segments from Initial Identification Efforts (continued) Outstandingly Remarkable Values Determination River Segment Total Segment Length (miles) Length on BLM- administered Lands (miles) Free Flowing 

Scenic 

Recreation 

Geological 

Fish 

Wildlife 

Historic 

Cultural 

Other Not Eligible Eligible 

Lost Horse Creek 5.40 0.85 X segment 1 0.02 X segment 2 0.15 X segment 3 0.27 X segment 4 0.24 X segment 5 0.17 X Lump Gulch 7.91 2.56 X segment 1 1.27 X segment 2 1.03 X segment 3 0.26 X Missouri River 43.79 29.21 X segment 1 3.05 Y X X segment 2 5.47 X segment 3 2.77 X segment 4 14.21 X segment 5 1.66 X segment 6 0.13 X segment 7 0.14 X segment 8 0.27 X segment 9 0.48 X segment 10 0.76 X segment 11 0.27 X 
Appendix I 

844 Butte Draft RMP/EIS Table D-1 River Segments from Initial Identification Efforts (continued) Outstandingly Remarkable Values Determination River Segment Total Segment Length (miles) Length on BLM- administered Lands (miles) Free Flowing 

Scenic 

Recreation 

Geological 

Fish 

Wildlife 

Historic 

Cultural 

Other Not Eligible Eligible 

Moose Creek 11.88 7.46 X segment 1 4.00 Y X X X X segment 2 3.46 X Muskrat Creek 2.60 2.60 Y X X Nelson Gulch 1.64 1.64 X Patton Gulch 1.79 1.59 X segment 1 1.53 X segment 2 0.06 X Piegan Creek 4.18 1.37 X segment 1 0.14 X segment 2 0.27 X segment 3 0.06 X segment 4 0.11 X segment 5 0.17 X segment 6 0.46 X segment 7 0.06 X segment 8 0.10 X Prickly Pear Creek 1.92 1.16 X segment 1 0.89 X segment 2 0.27 X Saint Louis Gulch 1.59 0.49 X segment 1 0.04 X segment 2 0.45 X 
 Butte Draft RMP/EIS 845

Table D-1 River Segments from Initial Identification Efforts (continued) Outstandingly Remarkable Values Determination River Segment Total Segment Length (miles) Length on BLM- administered Lands (miles) Free Flowing 

Scenic 

Recreation 

Geological 

Fish 

Wildlife 

Historic 

Cultural 

Other Not Eligible Eligible 

Sevenmile Creek 1.35 1.28 X Sheep Creek 3.74 3.09 X Silver Creek 5.25 2.81 X segment 1 0.12 X segment 2 0.28 X segment 3 0.37 X segment 4 0.38 X segment 5 0.25 X segment 6 0.88 X segment 7 0.53 0.53 X Skelly Gulch 0.91 0.79 X Soap Creek 8.28 5.02 X segment 1 0.93 X segment 2 0.71 X segment 3 0.91 X segment 4 0.31 X segment 5 2.15 X Teddy Creek 1.78 1.56 X Towhead Gulch 2.95 1.64 X segment 1 0.71 X segment 2 0.93 X Virginia Creek 3.44 1.79 X Note: * = Indian Creek Segment 5 was initially found to be eligible. Further evaluation during the suitability phase determined the segment not to be free 

flowing. The extensive historic and current mining activities have resulted in a channel which does not meet the “natural condition” requirements of free flowing. Numerous placer piles along the segment have resulted in severe modification of the natural channel. 
Appendix I 

846 Butte Draft RMP/EIS Table D-1 River Segments from Initial Identification Efforts (continued) Outstandingly Remarkable Values Determination River Segment Total Segment Length (miles) Length on BLM- administered Lands (miles) Free Flowing 

Scenic 

Recreation 

Geological 

Fish 

Wildlife 

Historic 

Cultural 

Other Not Eligible Eligible 

Whipcracker Gulch 3.81 2.28 X segment 1 0.18 X segment 2 0.56 X segment 3 1.55 X Wood Gulch 1.26 1.26 X Yellowstone River 5.04 4.96 X segment 1 0.24 X segment 2 0.19 X segment 3 0.31 X segment 4 1.28 X segment 5 0.65 X segment 6 0.24 X segment 7 0.89 X segment 8 0.27 X segment 9 0.90 X