alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of **VisualMED Clinical Solutions** (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Philippe Rainville, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated this 3rd day of March, 2005.

 
/s/ Philippe Rainville 
Philippe Rainville 
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

The following certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238 is being furnished to the SEC rather than
filed either as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement, and is not to be incorporated by reference into the Report or any other filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing. The following certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of
Section 18 or Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Raymond Cook, Chief Financial Officer of STEC, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending March 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ RAYMOND COOK       
|Raymond Cook           
|Chief Financial Officer

May 11, 2009
§ 245a.11 Eligibility to adjust to LPR status. An eligible alien, as defined in § 245a.10, may adjust status to LPR status under LIFE Legalization if: ( a ) He or she properly files, with fee, Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, with the Service during the application period beginning June 1, 2001, and ending June 4, 2003.
( b ) He or she entered the United States before January 1, 1982, and resided continuously in the United States in an unlawful status since that date through May 4, 1988;
( c ) He or she was continuously physically present in the United States during the period beginning on November 6, 1986, and ending on May 4, 1988;
( d ) He or she is not inadmissible to the United States for permanent residence under any provisions of section 212(a) of the Act, except as provided in § 245a.18, and that he or she: ( 1 ) Has not been convicted of any felony or of three or more misdemeanors committed in the United States;
( 2 ) Has not assisted in the persecution of any person or persons on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion; and
( 3 ) Is registered or registering under the Military Selective Service Act, if the alien is required to be so registered; and
( e ) He or she can demonstrate basic citizenship skills.
[66 FR 29673, June 1, 2001, as amended at 67 FR 38350, June 4, 2002]
#### § 280.15 Notice of final decision to district director of customs.

At such time as the decision under this part is final, the regional administrative officer shall be furnished a copy of the decision by the district director of immigration and naturalization or the Associate Commissioner for Examinations, or the Director for the National Fines Office. The regional administrative officer shall notify the district director of customs who was furnished a copy of the Notice of Intention to Fine of the final decision made in the case. Such notification need not be made if the regional administrative officer has been previously furnished with a notice of collection of the amount of the penalty by the district director of customs.

[32 FR 17651, Dec. 12, 1967, as amended at 54 FR 18649, May 2, 1989]
In the

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-24-00037-CR

EX PARTE LUIS ANGEL MARTINEZ HERNANDEZ

On Appeal from the County Court

Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10984CR

Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Stevens
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This Court previously reversed the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s pretrial writ of 

habeas corpus and remanded the matter to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing.1 Ex parte 

Hernandez, No. 06-23-00207-CR, 2023 WL 8422012 (Tex. App.—Texarkana Dec. 5, 2023, pet. 

filed) (mem. op., not designated for publication). Before the issuance of our mandate, and while 

the State’s petition for discretionary review was pending before the Texas Court of Criminal 

Appeals, the trial court issued another denial of Appellant’s pretrial writ of habeas corpus, which 

is the subject of this appeal.

Recognizing that the trial court’s action prior to the issuance of our mandate was a 

nullity, TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(g) (“Once the record has been filed in the appellate court, all further 

proceedings in the trial court—except as provided otherwise by law or by these rules—will be 

suspended until the trial court receives the appellate-court mandate.”), Appellant filed a motion 

to voluntarily dismiss this appeal, see TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss 

also states his desire to “await a decision from the Court of Criminal Appeals before pursuing his 

claim again.” 

1Originally appealed to the Fourth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme 

Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (Supp.).
3

We vacate the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s pretrial writ of habeas corpus issued on 

January 22, 2024, grant the appellant’s motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and dismiss this

appeal.

Scott E. Stevens

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: March 11, 2024

Date Decided: March 12, 2024

Do Not Publish
| 1. | I have reviewed this amendment to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Carbonics Capital Corporation for the period ended September 30, 2010; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | June 17, 2011 |
|-------------|---------------|

|   | /s/  | Stephen J. Schoepfer    |   |
|--------|-----------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |      | Stephen J. Schoepfer    |   |
|   |      | Chief Executive Officer |   |

----
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Investment Company Act Release No. 35040; 812-15443

Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Opportunities Fund and Eaton Vance Management

October 25, 2023

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission” or “SEC”).

ACTION: Notice.

Notice of an application under section 6(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”) 

for an exemption from sections 18(a)(2), 18(c) and 18(i) of the Act, under sections 6(c) and 23(c) 

of the Act for an exemption from rule 23c-3 under the Act, and for an order pursuant to section 

17(d) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act.

Summary of Application: Applicants request an order to permit certain registered closed-end 

investment companies to issue multiple classes of shares and to impose asset-based distribution 

and/or service fees and early withdrawal charges.

Applicants: Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Opportunities Fund and Eaton Vance Management

Filing Dates: The application was filed on March 15, 2023, and amended on April 11, 2023 and

August 18, 2023.

Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the requested relief will be issued unless 

the Commission orders a hearing. Interested persons may request a hearing on any application 

by e-mailing the SEC’s Secretary at Secretarys-Office@sec.gov and serving the Applicants with 

a copy of the request by e-mail, if an e-mail address is listed for the relevant Applicant below, or 

personally or by mail, if a physical address is listed for the relevant Applicant below. Hearing 

requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on November 20, 2023, and should 

be accompanied by proof of service on the Applicants, in the form of an affidavit, or, for 
2

lawyers, a certificate of service. Pursuant to rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should state 

the nature of the writer’s interest, any facts bearing upon the desirability of a hearing on the 

matter, the reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a 

hearing may request notification by emailing the Commission’s Secretary. 

ADDRESSES: The Commission: Secretarys-Office@sec.gov. Applicants: Deidre E. Walsh, 

Eaton Vance Management, dwalsh@eatonvance.com; with a copy to Sarah Clinton, Ropes & 

Gray LLP, sarah.clinton@ropesgray.com.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adam Large, Senior Special Counsel, at (202) 

551-7358 (Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel’s Office).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For Applicants’ representations, legal analysis, and 

conditions, please refer to Applicants’ amended application, dated August 18, 2023, which may 

be obtained via the Commission’s website by searching for the file number at the top of this 

document, or for an Applicant using the Company name search field on the SEC’s EDGAR 

system. The SEC’s EDGAR system may be searched at 

https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/legacy/companysearch.html. You may also call the 

SEC’s Public Reference Room at (202) 551-8090.

For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, under delegated 

authority.

Sherry R. Haywood,

Assistant Secretary.
§ 300.102 Limitation—exception to FAPE for certain ages. ( a ) *General.* The obligation to make FAPE available to all children with disabilities does not apply with respect to the following: ( 1 ) Children aged 3, 4, 5, 18, 19, 20, or 21 in a State to the extent that its application to those children would be inconsistent with State law or practice, or the order of any court, respecting the provision of public education to children of those ages.
( 2 ) ( i ) Children aged 18 through 21 to the extent that State law does not require that special education and related services under Part B of the Act be provided to students with disabilities who, in the last educational placement prior to their incarceration in an adult correctional facility— ( A ) Were not actually identified as being a child with a disability under § 300.8; and
( B ) Did not have an IEP under Part B of the Act.
( ii ) The exception in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section does not apply to children with disabilities, aged 18 through 21, who— ( A ) Had been identified as a child with a disability under § 300.8 and had received services in accordance with an IEP, but who left school prior to their incarceration; or
( B ) Did not have an IEP in their last educational setting, but who had actually been identified as a child with a disability under § 300.8.
( 3 ) ( i ) Children with disabilities who have graduated from high school with a regular high school diploma.
( ii ) The exception in paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section does not apply to children who have graduated from high school but have not been awarded a regular high school diploma.
( iii ) Graduation from high school with a regular high school diploma constitutes a change in placement, requiring written prior notice in accordance with § 300.503.
( iv ) As used in paragraphs (a)(3)(i) through (iii) of this section, the term *regular high school diploma* means the standard high school diploma awarded to the preponderance of students in the State that is fully aligned with State standards, or a higher diploma, except that a regular high school diploma shall not be aligned to the alternate academic achievement standards described in section 1111(b)(1)(E) of the ESEA. A regular high school diploma does not include a recognized equivalent of a diploma, such as a general equivalency diploma, certificate of completion, certificate of attendance, or similar lesser credential.
( 4 ) Children with disabilities who are eligible under subpart H of this part, but who receive early intervention services under Part C of the Act.
( b ) *Documents relating to exceptions.* The State must assure that the information it has provided to the Secretary regarding the exceptions in paragraph (a) of this section, as required by § 300.700 (for purposes of making grants to States under this part), is current and accurate.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0030) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(1)(B)-(C) and 7801(43))
[71 FR 46753, Aug. 14, 2006, as amended at 82 FR 29759, June 30, 2017]
# C_2018392EN.01002501.xml

| 29.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 September 2018 — Duferco Long Products v Commission

(Case T-93/17) (1)

((State aid - Steel sector - Aid granted by Belgium in favour of a number of undertakings in the steel sector - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Duty to state reasons - Notion of State aid - Advantage - Private investor test))

(2018/C 392/30)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Duferco Long Products SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: J.-F. Bellis, R. Luff and M. Favart, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier, V. Bottka and G. Luengo, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment in part of Commission Decision (EU) 2016/2041 of 20 January 2016 on State aid SA.33926 2013/C (ex 2013/NN, 2011/CP) implemented by Belgium in favour of Duferco (OJ 2016, L 314, p. 22).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Duferco Long Products SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Duferco Long Products SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 121, 18.4.2017.

---
#### Joseph Haas and Another, Respondents, v. Joseph Hilton and Another, Appellants.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
§ 303.320 Screening procedures (optional). ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) The lead agency may adopt procedures, consistent with the requirements of this section, to screen children under the age of three who have been referred to the part C program to determine whether they are suspected of having a disability under this part. If the lead agency or EIS provider proposes to screen a child, it must— ( i ) Provide the parent notice under § 303.421 of its intent to screen the child to identify whether the child is suspected of having a disability and include in that notice a description of the parent's right to request an evaluation under § 303.321 at any time during the screening process; and
( ii ) Obtain parental consent as required in § 303.420(a)(1) before conducting the screening procedures.
( 2 ) If the parent consents to the screening and the screening or other available information indicates that the child is— ( i ) Suspected of having a disability, after notice is provided under § 303.421 and once parental consent is obtained as required in § 303.420, an evaluation and assessment of the child must be conducted under § 303.321; or
( ii ) Not suspected of having a disability, the lead agency or EIS provider must ensure that notice of that determination is provided to the parent under § 303.421, and that the notice describes the parent's right to request an evaluation.
( 3 ) If the parent of the child requests and consents to an evaluation at any time during the screening process, evaluation of the child must be conducted under § 303.321, even if the lead agency or EIS provider has determined under paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section that the child is not suspected of having a disability.
( b ) *Definition of screening procedures. Screening procedures* — ( 1 ) Means activities under paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section that are carried out by, or under the supervision of, the lead agency or EIS provider to identify, at the earliest possible age, infants and toddlers suspected of having a disability and in need of early intervention services; and
( 2 ) Includes the administration of appropriate instruments by personnel trained to administer those instruments.
( c ) *Condition for evaluation or early intervention services.* For every child under the age of three who is referred to the part C program or screened in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, the lead agency is not required to— ( 1 ) Provide an evaluation of the child under § 303.321 unless the child is suspected of having a disability or the parent requests an evaluation under paragraph (a)(3) of this section; or
( 2 ) Make early intervention services available under this part to the child unless a determination is made that the child meets the definition of *infant or toddler with a disability* under § 303.21.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1432(4)(E)(ix), 1434(1), 1435(a)(2), 1435(a)(5) and (a)(6), 1435(c)(2)(G), 1437(a)(6), 1439(a)(6))
# Official Journal C 282/19 N

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 282 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4719 November 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 282

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4719 November 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 282/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2004/C 282/2 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3536 — OUTOKUMPU WASACOPPER/AURAJOKI/CUPRU JV) (1) | 2 |
| 2004/C 282/3 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3580 — CINVEN/CBR) (1) | 2 |
| 2004/C 282/4 | State aid — Germany — State aid No C 31/04 (ex NN 53/04) — Schiefergruben Magog — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (1) | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 282/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2004/C 282/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3536 — OUTOKUMPU WASACOPPER/AURAJOKI/CUPRU JV) (1)

2

2004/C 282/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3580 — CINVEN/CBR) (1)

2

2004/C 282/4

State aid — Germany — State aid No C 31/04 (ex NN 53/04) — Schiefergruben Magog — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (1)

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**Exhibit (23)(ii)(B)****Consent of the Qualified Reserves Evaluator**     I hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Offering Circular constituting partof the Registration Statement of Form S-3 (File No 33-41418) filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on June 27, 1991 of the statements and opinions as to reserves under “Item 8. FinancialStatements and Supplementary Data” in Imperial Oil Limited’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2005, in reliance upon my authority as expert and to the referenceto me under the heading “Experts” in the Offering Circular as modified by the Supplemental datedFebruary 28, 2006 to such Offering Circular.   /s/  J.F.M. Elliott    J. F. (John) Elliott, P. Eng.  Operations Technical Subsurface Engineering ManagerImperial Oil Resources  A wholly-owned subsidiary of  Imperial Oil Limited  Date: February 27, 2006
#### § 343b.1 Application.

A naturalized citizen who desires to obtain recognition as a citizen of the United States by a foreign state shall submit an application on the form designated by USCIS with the fee specified in 8 CFR 106.2 and in accordance with the form instructions. He shall not be furnished with verification of his naturalization for such purpose in any other way. An applicant who is a claimant against a foreign government for property damage pursuant to the provisions of a peace treaty shall not be requested to furnish the name, official title, and address of a foreign official unless such information is available when the investigation of the applicant is conducted. The applicant shall be required to appear in person before an assigned officer for interrogation under oath or affirmation upon the application.

[32 FR 9636, July 4, 1967, as amended at 56 FR 50502, Oct. 7, 1991; 76 FR 53805, Aug. 29, 2011; 85 FR 46929, Aug. 3, 2020]