alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1835. Orders to preserve confidentiality

(a) In General.—In any prosecution or other proceeding under this chapter, the court shall enter such orders and take such other action as may be necessary and appropriate to preserve the confidentiality of trade secrets, consistent with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Criminal and Civil Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and all other applicable laws. An interlocutory appeal by the United States shall lie from a decision or order of a district court authorizing or directing the disclosure of any trade secret.

(b) Rights of Trade Secret Owners.—The court may not authorize or direct the disclosure of any information the owner asserts to be a trade secret unless the court allows the owner the opportunity to file a submission under seal that describes the interest of the owner in keeping the information confidential. No submission under seal made under this subsection may be used in a prosecution under this chapter for any purpose other than those set forth in this section, or otherwise required by law. The provision of information relating to a trade secret to the United States or the court in connection with a prosecution under this chapter shall not constitute a waiver of trade secret protection, and the disclosure of information relating to a trade secret in connection with a prosecution under this chapter shall not constitute a waiver of trade secret protection unless the trade secret owner expressly consents to such waiver.

(Added Pub. L. 104–294, title I, §101(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3490; amended Pub. L. 114–153, §3(a)(2), May 11, 2016, 130 Stat. 382.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, referred to in subsec. (a), are set out in the Appendix to this title.

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (a), are set out in the Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

The Federal Rules of Evidence, referred to in subsec. (a), are set out in the Appendix to Title 28.

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–153 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).
§ 34.28 Refunds of amounts collected in error. ( a ) If a hearing official determines under §§ 34.16 and 34.17 that a person does not owe the debt described in our notice or that an administrative wage garnishment under this part was barred by law at the time of the collection action, we promptly refund any amount collected by means of this garnishment.
( b ) Unless required by Federal law or contract, we do not pay interest on a refund.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3720D)
#### § 371.10 What are the requirements for funding training and technical assistance under this subpart?

The Secretary shall first reserve not less than 1.8 percent and not more than 2 percent of funds appropriated and made available to carry out this program to provide training and technical assistance to the governing bodies of Indian tribes and consortia of those governing bodies awarded a grant under this program.

(Authority: Sections 12(c) and Section 121(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 741(c))
§ 370.40 What are allowable costs? ( a ) The designated agency, including the eligible protection and advocacy system serving the American Indian Consortium, shall apply the regulations at 2 CFR part 200.
( b ) Consistent with the program activities listed in § 370.4, the cost of travel in connection with the provision to a client or client-applicant of assistance under this program is allowable, in accordance with 2 CFR part 200. The cost of travel includes the cost of travel for an attendant if the attendant must accompany the client or client-applicant.
( c ) ( 1 ) The State and the designated agency are accountable, both jointly and severally, to the Secretary for the proper use of funds made available under this part. However, the Secretary may choose to recover funds under the procedures in 34 CFR part 81 from either the State or the designated agency, or both, depending on the circumstances of each case.
( 2 ) For purposes of the grant made under this part to the protection and advocacy system serving the American Indian Consortium, such entity will be solely accountable to the Secretary for the proper use of funds made available under this part. If the Secretary determines it necessary, the Secretary may recover funds from the protection and advocacy system serving the American Indian Consortium pursuant to the procedures in 34 CFR part 81.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 112(c)(3) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 732(c)(3))
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, May 3, 2011 and Wednesday, May 4, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement Project Committee will be held Tuesday, May 3, 2011 from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and Wednesday, May 4, 2011 from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. Eastern Time at 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn,  NY 11201. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Notification of intent to participate must be made with Ms. Jenkins. For more information, please contact Ms. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or post comments to the web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: March 24, 2011.

Shawn Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2011-7534 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
§ 300.622 Consent. ( a ) Parental consent must be obtained before personally identifiable information is disclosed to parties, other than officials of participating agencies in accordance with paragraph (b)(1) of this section, unless the information is contained in education records, and the disclosure is authorized without parental consent under 34 CFR part 99.
( b ) ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this section, parental consent is not required before personally identifiable information is released to officials of participating agencies for purposes of meeting a requirement of this part.
( 2 ) Parental consent, or the consent of an eligible child who has reached the age of majority under State law, must be obtained before personally identifiable information is released to officials of participating agencies providing or paying for transition services in accordance with § 300.321(b)(3).
( 3 ) If a child is enrolled, or is going to enroll in a private school that is not located in the LEA of the parent's residence, parental consent must be obtained before any personally identifiable information about the child is released between officials in the LEA where the private school is located and officials in the LEA of the parent's residence.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(8); 1417(c))
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4843 

To authorize the Susan Harwood Training Grant Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 23, 2019 

Mr. POCAN (for himself, Mr. COURTNEY, Ms. NORTON, Ms. LEE of California, 

Ms. WILD, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. NORCROSS, 

Mr. NADLER, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. WILSON of Florida, Ms. TLAIB, Mr. LEVIN of Michigan, Ms. MENG, and Mr. TAKANO) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To authorize the Susan Harwood Training Grant Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Susan Harwood Train5 ing Grant Program Authorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SUSAN HARWOOD TRAINING GRANT PROGRAM AU7 THORIZED. 

8 Section 21 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act 

9 of 1970 is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (c) to read as follows: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4843 IH

1 ‘‘(c) The Secretary, in consultation with the Sec2 retary of Health and Human Services, shall (1) provide 

3 for the establishment and supervision of programs for the 

4 education and training of employers and employees in the 

5 recognition, avoidance, and prevention of unsafe or 

6 unhealthful working conditions and in employee rights and 

7 employer responsibilities under this Act and (2) consult 

8 with and advise employers and employees, and organiza9 tions representing employers and employees as to effective 

10 means of preventing occupational injuries and illnesses.’’; 

11 and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(e) The Secretary shall create a program known as 

14 the Susan Harwood Training Grant Program to competi15 tively award grants to nonprofit organizations, employer 

16 associations, labor unions, and institutions of higher edu17 cation supported by State and local governments to pro18 vide training and education programs for employers and 

19 workers on the recognition, avoidance, and prevention of 

20 safety and health hazards in workplaces and to inform 

21 workers of their rights and employers of their responsibil22 ities under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (in23 cluding grants to develop or expand the capacity of such 

24 organizations to provide safety and health training, edu25 cation, and related assistance to the targeted audiences, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4843 IH

1 grants for the training of employees and employers on oc2 cupational safety and health hazards of particular concern 

3 or for particular industries, or groups of workers at high 

4 risk of injury, illness, or exposure to hazards, and grants 

5 for the development of training materials on particular 

6 topics).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
### §552. Consent to agreement by States for conservation of forests and water supply

Consent of the Congress of the United States is given to each of the several States of the Union to enter into any agreement or compact, not in conflict with any law of the United States, with any other State or States for the purpose of conserving the forests and the water supply of the States entering into such agreement or compact.

(Mar. 1, 1911, ch. 186, §1, 36 Stat. 961.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Act Mar. 1, 1911, ch. 186, 36 Stat. 961, which enacted this section, former sections 513 and 514 of this title, and sections 515 to 519, 521, and 563 of this title and amended sections 480 and 500 of this title, is popularly known as the Weeks Law.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 84712 / December 3, 2018

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-16017

In the Matter of

Linkbrokers Derivatives LLC

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER DIRECTING 

DISBURSEMENT OF FAIR FUND

On August 15, 2016, pursuant to Rule 1103 of the Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and 

Disgorgement Plans (“Rules”), 17 C.F.R. § 201.1103, the Commission published a Notice of 

Proposed Plan of Distribution and Opportunity for Comment (“Notice”).1 The Notice advised 

interested persons that they could obtain a copy of the Proposed Plan of Distribution (“Proposed 

Plan”) from the Commission’s public website or by submitting a written request to Michael S. 

Lim, Esq., United States Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, 

D.C. 20549-5631. All persons desiring to comment on the Proposed Plan could submit their 

comments, in writing, no later than thirty (30) days from the date of the Notice. No comments 

were received. On November 4, 2016, the Commission issued an Order Approving Plan of 

Distribution.2 The Plan provides for the distribution of the disgorgement and civil penalties paid 

by Linkbrokers Derivatives LLC and Aaron Nowak, respectively, plus any accumulated interest 

that is earned, less any reserve for taxes, fees, or other expenses of administering the Plan (the 

“Fair Fund”) to Eligible Investors3according to the methodology set forth in the Plan. 

The Fund Administrator has submitted to Commission staff a payment file with a list of 

payees and their respective payment amounts. The staff has reviewed the payee list and requests 

that, pursuant to Rule 1101(b)(6) of the Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement 

Plans, the Commission direct the payment of $14,005,376.71 from the Fair Fund to The 

Huntington National Bank for distribution by the Fund Administrator to Eligible Investors as 

provided for in the Plan.

 

1 Exchange Act Rel. No. 78577 (Aug. 15, 2016).

2 Exchange Act Rel. No. 79248 (Nov. 4, 2016). 

3 All capitalized terms used but not herein defined shall have the same meanings ascribed to them in the Plan.
2

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Commission staff shall direct the disbursement of 

$14,005,376.71 from the Fair Fund to The Huntington National Bank for distribution by the 

Fund Administrator to Eligible Investors as provided for in the Plan.

By the Commission.

Brent J. Fields

Secretary
!
!

"#$%&')&*

&,.'0!


1')

2#..3&

5,)36'',7,..*

	
	



	




	

	
	



 	
 !"#!$%&'#()

*	
+,	-.	/

0
 ,	
!!

1


.

	
2,-
3

	
	
		
	

	 !"	
#$%


&
		' %##($)


%	%*	'+ 		


&
		,
%

%	%
 $$	 !

	-%#.#($.		%$./$#)0#/121"	
#


&

		,
%

%	 '	 / 		3 	


&

	
	%	


	


Case 19-10542-BFK Doc 65 Filed 09/30/19 Entered 09/30/19 11:29:32 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
&

				%	

					%	
	




-+
%'4

5+ 6


5	'
%
+	$'
	'



	 	
 			%	
3 	

 		77(
8	" '&		
 	

 	#((#9:

8	" '


5&	6		

	 			%	
3 	


5&" '
	 

%+


4,


.	0		0			5,,

0	

5,!&	
,
,




	6

7$$'8	9,(
	6
	
-

 

;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

8-
1<--<=

8-1&=>?<

	


		

	

Dated: Sep 30 2019 /s/ Brian F. Kenney

Entered on Docket: September 30, 2019

Case 19-10542-BFK Doc 65 Filed 09/30/19 Entered 09/30/19 11:29:32 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
@@"	"

"	"	'

5


	

$!#0>"A0(

3	B##7$

9!(7:00!/!##)

		5%64

@@		8B	9/ '	':

		8B	<,


		8
B	C&

	


A($1	((

3	B##7$

9!(7:!7)/$707

<4	+D



	


%'
'	#A'
 %#($)/ '


  		8B	<,
/

%


@@"	"

Case 19-10542-BFK Doc 65 Filed 09/30/19 Entered 09/30/19 11:29:32 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 2,007

 3,658

 4,036

 5,029

 4,432

 3,412

 2,845

 2,039

 1,829

 1,783

 2,269

 2,632

 2,596

 2,302

 1,766

 1,588

 1,473

 1,230

 957

 722

 729

 597

 674

 689

 514

 519

 2,399

 3,816

 4,074

 3,891

 145

 160

 186

 198

 281

 214

 215

 222

 209

 184

 181

 170

 196

 191

 148

 149

 145

 147

 146

 142

 145

 139

 138

 135

 133

 132

 134

 129

 137

 125

 726

 1,196

 1,460

 1,941

 1,835

 1,596

 1,354

 1,119

 974

 795

 836

 908

 1,003

 762

 506

 538

 526

 449

 362

 318

 305

 247

 236

 235

 215

 237

 500

 708

 1,256

 1,254

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 3, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Summary: Tribe Misapplied More than $12.4 Million and Still 

Owes More than $4.4 Million 

Report Date: September 2, 2020 Report Number: 18-0132 

We investigated allegations that a Native American Tribe falsified quarterly financial reports for 

Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) funded projects to conceal that it had misapplied contract funds. 

We confirmed the Tribe misapplied $7,634,868.54 in BOR funds in 2016 and $4,770,917 in 

2017. The Tribe repaid some of the funds but still owes $4,405,785.54. Tribal officials admitted 

to misapplying the funds intended for the BOR-funded projects to meet the Tribe’s other 

financial obligations. We did not find evidence that anyone personally benefited from the 

misapplication of funds. 

We found inaccuracies in the financial status reports but did not find criminal intent. BOR 

personnel worked with the Tribe to complete the reports and knew the reports did not accurately 

reflect the cash on hand for the two projects. BOR employees said they helped complete the 

forms as accurately as possible based upon the information made available, and they specifically 

included remarks on the relevant forms identifying unjustified expenses and cash that could not 

be accounted for. 

We referred this matter to the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Montana, which 

declined prosecution. This is a summary of a report we provided to the Director of the BOR. 

Office of Investigations | Office of Inspector General | U.S. Department of the Interior | Washington, DC
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1164

TILLIE M. TWITTY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HUBBELL PREMISE-MARION, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District

Judge. (CA-95-255)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: June 28, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tillie M. Twitty, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

this action alleging age and race discrimination. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Twitty v. Hubbell Premise-Marion, Inc., No. CA-95-255

(W.D.N.C. Jan. 2, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
| ** **

** **

**Exhibit 12.3 **          |
|---------------------------------------------------------|
| **Idaho Power Company**                                 |
| **Consolidated Financial  Information**                 |
| **Ratio of Earnings to  Fixed Charges**                 |
|                                                         |
|                                                         | **Twelve Months Ended** |
|                                                         | **December 31,** |
|                                                         | **(Thousands of Dollars)** |
|                                                         |
| ** **                                              | **2009** | **2008** | **2007** | **2006** | **2005** |
|                                                         |  |  |  |  |  |
| Earnings, as defined:                                   |  |  |  |  |  |
|                                                         |  |  |  |  |  |
| Income before income taxes                              |  $ | 158,080  |  $ | 131,715  |  $ | 111,965  |  $ | 137,890  |  $ | 115,764  |
| Adjust for distributed income of  equity investees      | 2,464  | (6,772) | (5,553) | (9,347) | (10,370) |
| Equity in loss of equity method  investments            | -  | -  | -  | -  | -  |
| Minority interest in losses of  majority owned          |  |  |  |  |  |
| subsidiaries                                            | -  | -  | -  | -  | -  |
| Fixed charges, as below                                 | 78,543  | 77,568  | 68,272  | 60,687  | 57,739  |
| Total earnings, as defined                              |  $ | 239,087  |  $ | 202,511  |  $ | 174,684  |  $ | 189,230  |  $ | 163,133  |
|                                                         |  |  |  |  |  |
| Fixed charges, as defined:                              |  |  |  |  |  |
|                                                         |  |  |  |  |  |
| Interest charges1                                       |  $ | 77,580  |  $ | 76,711  |  $ | 67,386  |  $ | 59,955  |  $ | 56,866  |
| Rental interest factor                                  | 963  | 857  | 886  | 732  | 873  |
| Total fixed charges, as defined                         |  $ | 78,543  |  $ | 77,568  |  $ | 68,272  |  $ | 60,687  |  $ | 57,739  |
|                                                         |  |  |  |  |  |
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                      | 3.04 x | 2.61 x | 2.56 x | 3.12 x | 2.83 x |
|                                                         |  |  |  |  |  |
| 1 FIN 48 interest is not included in  interest charges. |  |  |  |  |  |
|                                                         |  |  |  |  |  |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                 HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                            DEBT SECURITIES RATINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                       Duff &
                                                   Standard     Moody's     Fitch      Phelps
                                                   & Poor's    Investors  Investors    Credit     Thomson
                                                  Corporation   Service   Services   Rating Co.  BankWatch
<S>                                               <C>          <C>        <C>        <C>         <C>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At December 31, 1999
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Household Finance Corporation
  Senior debt                                               A         A2         A+          A+         A+
  Senior subordinated debt                                 A-         A3          A           A          A
  Commercial paper                                        A-1        P-1        F-1     Duff 1+      TBW-1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Household Bank (Nevada), N.A.
  Senior debt                                               A         A2         A+          A+         A+
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>