alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Jarbidge Draft RMP/EIS Maps 

M-19 

Map 18. Streams Containing Bull Trout and Redband Trout 

August 2010 

S n a k e R i v e r

S n a k e R i v e r

C l o v e r C r e e k

S a l m o

n

F a l l s

C r e

e k

J a r b i d g e

R i v

e r

51

Jackpot

93

ELKO

COUNTY

IDAHO IDAHO

NEVADA NEVADA

C e d a r C r e e

B

k

r u

n

e

a

u

R i v e r

EF Jarbidge

84

30

78

Buhl

Bliss

Bruneau

Hammett

Hagerman

Roseworth

King Hill

Castleford

Three Creek

Glenns

Ferry

Murphy Hot Springs

OWYHEE

COUNTY

TWIN FALLS

COUNTY

ELMORE

COUNTY

GOODING

COUNTY

0 1 5 0

Miles

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land

Management. The accuracy, reliability, or

completeness of these data for individual use

or aggregate use with other data is not guaranteed.

Bull Trout

Bull and Redband Trout

Redband Trout

Perennial Streams

Intermittent Steams
Case 19-10775-BFK Doc 15-1 Filed 04/09/19 Entered 04/09/19 17:40:51 Desc 

 Declaration of Real Estate Agent (Stephen Karbelk) Page 1 of 2
Case 19-10775-BFK Doc 15-1 Filed 04/09/19 Entered 04/09/19 17:40:51 Desc 

 Declaration of Real Estate Agent (Stephen Karbelk) Page 2 of 2
#### § 300.130 Definition of parentally-placed private school children with disabilities.

*Parentally-placed private school children with disabilities* means children with disabilities enrolled by their parents in private, including religious, schools or facilities that meet the definition of elementary school in § 300.13 or secondary school in § 300.36, other than children with disabilities covered under §§ 300.145 through 300.147.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0030)

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(10)(A))
Case 18-07014-FJS Doc 13 Filed 06/26/18 Entered 06/29/18 15:14:33 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sub Surface Waste Management of
Delaware, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September
30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Conrad Nagel, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                           /S/ CONRAD NAGEL
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Conrad Nagel
                                           Principal Accounting Officer
                                           January 18, 2006

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as A separate disclosure
document.
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Diamond, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-4849.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an
advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of De cisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

S LIP O PINION N O . 2016-O HIO -4849
T HE S TATE OF O HIO , A PPELLANT , v. D IAMOND , A PPELLEE . [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Diamond, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-4849.] Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and c ause remanded for further proceedings
consistent with State v. Heinz

. (No. 2014-1714—Submitted June 1, 2016—Decided July 11, 2016.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 101914.

__________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of app eals is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with our decision in State v. Heinz , ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-2814, ___ N.E.3d ___.
O’C ONNOR , C.J., and P FEIFER , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , K ENNEDY , F RENCH , and O’N EILL , JJ., concur.

_________________ Timothy J. McGinty, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and T. Allan Regas and Frank Romeo Zelezn ikar, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellant.S UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 _________________
#### Illinois Surety Company, Plaintiff, v. Francesco Santomassimo and Others, Respondents, Impleaded with John Ansani, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Mo opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.
§ 222.13 What overpayments are not eligible for forgiveness under section 8012 of the Act? The Secretary does not consider as eligible for forgiveness under section 8012 of the Act any overpayment caused by an LEA's failure to expend or account for funds properly under the following laws and regulations: ( a ) Section 8003(d) of the Act (implemented in subpart D of this part) for certain federally connected children with disabilities.
( b ) Section 8007 of the Act for construction.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7712)
[80 FR 33162, June 11, 2015]
§ 463.415 What entity serves as the one-stop partner for a particular program in the local area? ( a ) The entity that carries out the program and activities listed in § 463.400 or § 463.410, and therefore serves as the one-stop partner, is the grant recipient, administrative entity, or organization responsible for administering the funds of the specified program in the local area. The term “entity” does not include the service providers that contract with, or are subrecipients of, the local administrative entity. For programs that do not include local administrative entities, the responsible State agency must be the partner. Specific entities for particular programs are identified in paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section. If a program or activity listed in § 463.400 is not carried out in a local area, the requirements relating to a required one-stop partner are not applicable to such program or activity in that local one-stop delivery system.
( b ) For title II of WIOA, the entity or agency that carries out the program for the purposes of paragraph (a) of this section is the sole entity or agency in the State or outlying area responsible for administering or supervising policy for adult education and literacy activities in the State or outlying area. The State eligible entity or agency may delegate its responsibilities under paragraph (a) of this section to one or more eligible providers or consortium of eligible providers.
( c ) For the VR program, authorized under title I of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended by WIOA title IV, the entity that carries out the program for the purposes of paragraph (a) of this section is the designated State agencies or designated State units specified under sec. 101(a)(2) of the Rehabilitation Act that is primarily concerned with vocational rehabilitation, or vocational and other rehabilitation, of individuals with disabilities.
( d ) Under WIOA title I, the national programs, including Job Corps, the Native American program, YouthBuild, and Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker programs are required one-stop partners. The entity for the Native American program, YouthBuild, and Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker programs is the grantee of those respective programs. The entity for Job Corps is the Job Corps center.
( e ) For the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006, the entity that carries out the program for the purposes of paragraph (a) of this section is the eligible recipient or recipients at the postsecondary level, or a consortium of eligible recipients at the postsecondary level in the local area. The eligible recipient at the postsecondary level may also request assistance from the State eligible agency in completing its responsibilities under paragraph (a) of this section.
#### § 21.22 Applicants representing others.

If an applicant is a party in an adversary adjudication primarily on behalf of one or more persons or entities that are ineligible under this part, then the applicant is not eligible for an award.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 504 (b)(1)(B) and (c)(1))
September 2003 CVC Water Delivery Records

Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Green indicates Actual Delivery Data

Red indicates Scheduled Data Blue indicates Actual Data Deliveries on Behalf of CVC Contractors (75% Allocation)

Sep 

2003

Scheduled 

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Banks 

AF

Scheduled 

Article 55 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Banks 

AF

Scheduled 

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Tracy 

AF

Actual 

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Banks 

AF

Actual 

Article 55 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Banks 

AF

Actual 

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Tracy 

AF

Actual 

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Dos 

Amigos for 

Delivery 

AF

3% Loss 

Between 

Banks and 

O'Neill 

Based on 

Actual 

Pumping

9/1/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/2/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/3/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/4/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/5/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/6/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/7/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/8/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/9/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/10/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/11/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/12/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/13/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/14/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/15/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/16/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/17/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/18/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/19/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/20/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/21/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/22/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/23/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/24/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/25/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/26/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/27/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/28/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/29/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

9/30/2003 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

Sep Total 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

Note:

h:\data\public\~water\~smith\CVC\2003\2003 CVC Deliveries.xls 10/14/2003 11:50 AM
1 John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sit ting by a ssignmen t. NO. 07-05-0084-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TE XAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL E JUNE 23, 2005

______________________________ JESUS ANTU, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLE E

_________________________________ FROM THE 64TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAL E COUNTY; NO. A1570 8-0409; H ONORABLEROBERT W. KINKAI D, JR., JU DGE

_______________________________ Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ. and BOYD , S.J. 1
ABATEMENT AND REMAND Following an open plea of guilty, a ppellan t Jesus A ntu was convicted of driving while intoxicated, enhanced, and punishment was assessed at five years confinement and a $2,000 fine. Although trial counsel was retained, appellant filed a prose notice of appeal.2

Both the clerk’s recor

d and rep orter’s re cord have been filed. Appellant’s brief was dueto be filed on May 18, 2005, but has yet to be filed. Also, no motion for extension of time has been filed. On May 31, 2005, appellant was notified of the defect and also directed to file either his brief or a respo nse b y June 10, 2005. Appellant did not respond and the brief remains outstanding. Therefore, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for furt her proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Tex as Rules of Appellat e Procedure. Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given an d, thereafter, cond uct a hea ring to d etermine the follo wing: 1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; and 2. whether a ppellan t is indi gent and entitled to appoi nted coun sel. The trial court shall cause a hearing to be tran scribed. Sho uld it be determined that appellan tdoes want to continue the appeal and is indigent, then the trial court shall al s o take such measures as may be necessary to assure appella nt effec tive as sistance of counsel, which measures may include the appointment of coun sel. If counsel is appointed, the name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of said co unsel shall be included in the order appointing new counsel. Finally, the trial court shall execute findings of fa ct, conclusions of law, and such orders as the court may enter regarding th e aforementioned issues, and cause its findings and co n clusions to be included in a supplemental clerk's record. A supplemental record of the hearing sh all also be included3

in the appellate record. Finally, thetrial court shall file the supplemental clerk's record and the supplemental reporter's record with the Clerk of this Court by Friday, July 29, 2005. It is so ordered. Per Curiam Do not pu blish.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 23, 2009

d1116 

# Order

November 23, 2009

139127(17)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139127 COA: 291632 Washtenaw CC: 07-000440-FC JOSEPH WEBSTER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s September 28, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it doe s not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1003

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1003 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10350, Mar. 5, 2003.

#### § 1003.33 Translation of documents.

Any foreign language document offered by a party in a proceeding shall be accompanied by an English language translation and a certification signed by the translator that must be printed legibly or typed. Such certification must include a statement that the translator is competent to translate the document, and that the translation is true and accurate to the best of the translator's abilities.

[59 FR 1900, Jan. 13, 1994]
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10(f)(2)


                                HUNT CORPORATION

        Executive Officers Who Are Parties to Change in Control Agreement


         The following current Executive Officers of Hunt Corporation are
parties to the aforesaid Change in Control Agreement: John W. Carney, William E.
Chandler, James P. Machut, W. Ernest Precious and Eugene A. Stiefel.

         Donald R. Thompson, Chairman, President and CEO of the Company, is not
a party to that Change in Control Agreement, but has change in control
provisions providing for a higher level of benefits in his April 6, 1996
Employment Agreement.

         Officers who are not executive officers also are parties to change in
control agreements which are similar to those of Executive Officers, but with
lower levels of benefits.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

In the Matter of:

NICOLINE K JARAMILLO

DEBTOR

USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK

Movant

v.

Nicoline K. Jaramillo

and

Thomas P. Gorman, Trustee,

Chapter 13

Case No. 19-10400-BFK

ANSWER AND REPORT OF TRUSTEE 

TO RELIEF FROM STAY MOTION

Thomas P. Gorman, the Chapter 13 Trustee, responds to the Motion for Relief 

from Automatic Stay by noting that neither the creditor or the property were listed by 

Debtor on Schedule A, D, or E/F, nor is any foreclosure disclosed on Statements of 

Financial Affairs #9. 

Date: August 26, 2019 __/s/ Thomas P. Gorman ____________

Thomas P. Gorman

Chapter 13 Trustee

300 North Washington Street, Ste. 400

Alexandria, VA 22314

(703) 836-2226

VSB 26421

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Answer & Report of Trustee was served via 

ECF to authorized users or mailed to counsel for the Movant and counsel for the Debtor, 

or to Debtor Pro Se, this 26th day of August, 2019. 

_/s/Thomas P. Gorman___________

Thomas P. Gorman

Case 19-10400-BFK Doc 51 Filed 08/26/19 Entered 08/26/19 13:37:03 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
# Official Journal L 219/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.219.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 219 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5222 August 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.219.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 219

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5222 August 2009

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 748/2009 of 5 August 2009 on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (1) | 1 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 748/2009 of 5 August 2009 on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Jeffery T. Martin, Jr. 

Henry & O'Donnell, P.C. 

300 N. Washington St. 

Suite 204 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

jtm@henrylaw.com

Jack Frankel 

Office of the US Trustee – Region 4 

115 South Union Street, Suite 210 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

Jack.I.Frankel@usdoj.gov

Richard A. Dubose, III 

Gebhardt & Smith LLP 

One South Street, Suite 2200 

Baltimore, MD 21202 

rdubo@gebsmith.com

Robert K. Coulter 

Office of the US Attorney 

2100 Jamieson Avenue 

Alexandria, Virginia 22314 

robert.coulter@usdoj.gov

David S. Musgrave 

Gordon Feinblatt LLC 

233 East Redwood Street 

Baltimore, MD 21202 

dmusgrave@gfrlaw.com

James T. Bacon 

Allred Bacon Halfhill & Young P.C. 

11350 Randon Hills Road, Suite 700 

Fairfax, VA 22030 

jbacon@abhylaw.com

John B. Connor 

John B. Connor, PLC 

1033 North Fairfax Street, Suite 310 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

jack@johnbconnor.com

Marion Dere Muller 

127 W. Jefferson Street, Suite 100 

Rockville, MD 20850 

Mmuller@mdmullerlaw.com

John T. Donelan 

Law Office of John T. Donelan 

125 South Royal Street 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

donelanlaw@gmail.com

Lauren P. McLaughlin 

Shoshana E. Rothman 

BrigliaMcLaughlin, PLLC 

1950 Old Gallows Road, Suite 750 

Tysons Corner, VA 22182 

lmclaughlin@briglialaw.com

srothman@briglialaw.com

Michael G. Gallerizzo 

Gebhardt and Smith LLP 

One South Street, Suite 2200 

Baltimore, Maryland 21202 

mgall@gebsmith.com

Bradford F. Englander 

Whiteford, Taylor & Preston LLP 

3190 Fairview Park Drive, Suite 800 

Falls Church, VA 22042 

benglander@wtplaw.com

Timothy C. Bass 

Thomas J. McKee, Jr. 

Greenberg Traurig, LLP 

1750 Tysons Boulevard, Suite 1000 

McLean, VA 22102 

basst@gtlaw.com

mckeet@gtlaw.com

Nancy R. Schlicthing 

Lenhart Pettit PC 

530 E. Main Street 

P.O. Box 2057 

Charlottesville, VA 22902 

nrs@lplaw.com

Lindsay A. Thompson 

Thomas F. Murphy 

Friedlander Misler, PLLC 

5335 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, Suite 600 

Washington, DC 20015 

lathompson@dclawfirm.com

tfmurphy@dclawfirm.com

Shawn C. Whittaker 

Whittaker & Associates 

1010 Rockville Pike, Suite 607 

Rockville, MD 20852 

shawn@whittaker-law.com

Ann M. Callaway 

Ann M. Callaway, P.C. 

15 Garrett Street 

Warrenton, VA 20186 

acallaway@anncallawaylaw.com

W. Calvin Smith 

Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig, PLLC 

211 Church Street, SE 

Leesburg, Virginia 20175 

csmith@dbllawyers.com

Robert M. Marino 

Redmon, Peyton & Braswell, LLP 

510 King Street, Suite 301 

Alexandria, Virginia 22314-3143 

rmmarino@rpb-law.com

Cary M. Craig, Jr. 

Harrison & Johnston, PLC 

21 South Loudoun Street 

Winchester, Virginia 22601 

craig@harrison-johnston.com

Jill D. Caravaggio 

Law Office of Jill D. Caravaggio 

11116 Innsbrook Way 

Suite B 

Ijamsville, MD 21754 

jill@jill-lawoffice.net

Case 18-11754-KHK Doc 85-3 Filed 07/13/18 Entered 07/13/18 15:23:29 Desc 

 Service List Page 1 of 1
#### § 396.34 What are the matching requirements?

A grantee must contribute to the cost of a project under this program in an amount satisfactory to the Secretary. The part of the costs to be borne by the grantee is determined by the Secretary at the time of the grant award.

(Authority: Section 12(c) and 302(f) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 772(f))
March 10, 2015

Mr. Blake Terry

618 South Gay Stre et

Knoxville

, TN 37902

Dear Mr. Terry :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your March 5 , 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0554 ) , but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request

any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and th e extent of

the relief you seek

.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

• The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect saf ety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Nia Daniels

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure