alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Carolina Investment Partners, Limited Partnership (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), Donald F. Walston,, General Partner of Walsmith Associates Two, general partner of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ Donald F. WalstonDonald F. WalstonGeneral Partner of Walsmith AssociatesTwo, general partner of the RegistrantMarch 29, 2004




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Carolina Investment Partners, Limited Partnership and will be retained by Carolina Investment Partners, Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request. The certifications set forth above shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company.
### §1156. Intoxicants possessed unlawfully

Whoever, except for scientific, sacramental, medicinal or mechanical purposes, possesses intoxicating liquors in the Indian country or where the introduction is prohibited by treaty or an Act of Congress, shall, for the first offense, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and, for each subsequent offense, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

The term "Indian country" as used in this section does not include fee-patented lands in non-Indian communities or rights-of-way through Indian reservations, and this section does not apply to such lands or rights-of-way in the absence of a treaty or statute extending the Indian liquor laws thereto.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 759; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §28, 63 Stat. 94; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(G), (I), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### 1948 Act

Based on sections 241, 244, 244a, 254 of title 25, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Indians (R.S. 2139; Feb. 27, 1877, ch. 69, §1, 19 Stat. 244; July 23, 1892, ch. 234, 27 Stat. 260; May 25, 1918, ch. 86, §1, 40 Stat. 563; June 30, 1919, ch. 4, §1, 41 Stat. 4; Mar. 5, 1934, ch. 43, 48 Stat. 396; June 27, 1934, ch. 846, 48 Stat. 1245; June 15, 1938, ch. 435, §1, 52 Stat. 696).

The revision of section 244 of title 25, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Indians, conforms with the effect thereon of sections 241, 244a, and 254 of said title.

The provisions relating to scope of term "Indian country" were omitted as unnecessary in view of definition of "Indian country" in section 1151 of this title.

Mandatory punishment provisions were rephrased in the alternative and provision for commitment for nonpayment of fine was deleted. Such change was also recommended by United States District Judge T. Blake Kennedy. (See reviser's note under section 1154 of this title.)

The exception of intoxicating liquor for scientific, sacramental, medicinal or mechanical purposes was inserted for the same reason that makes this exception appropriate to section 1262 of this title.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### 1949 Act

This section [section 28] adds to section 1156 of title 18, U.S.C., a paragraph to conform this section and section 1154 of such title more closely to the laws relating to intoxicating liquors in the Indian country as they have been heretofore construed.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $500" after "first offense, be" and for "fined not more than $2,000" after "subsequent offense, be" in first par.

1949—Act May 24, 1949, inserted last par.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

================================================================================

COMPUTATION OF INCOME PER SHARE

As more fully described in note 13 of the notes to consolidated financial
statements herein, the Company has outstanding certain employee stock option
plans and a stock purchase plan. The shares and options within such plans have
been determined to be common stock equivalents for purposes of computing income
per share.

During the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994, the market price of the
Company's common stock exceeded the exercise price of certain of these common
stock equivalents.

The weighted average number of primary shares including common stock equivalents
was 15,202,400 in 1995, 14,667,023 in 1994 and 14,161,160 in 1993. The weighted
average number of shares used to compute income per common share was
retroactively adjusted to reflect an 8% stock dividend declared in the first
quarter of 1996 and 5% stock dividends declared in the first quarters of 1994
and 1995.

The weighted average number of fully diluted shares including common stock
equivalents was 15,253,929 in 1995, 14,667,111 in 1994 and 14,200,887 in 1993.
The weighted average number of shares used to compute income per common share
was retroactively adjusted to reflect an 8% stock dividend declared in the first
quarter of 1996 and 5% stock dividends declared in the first quarters of 1994
and 1995.

                                  EXHIBIT 11



================================================================================
Company Filings

Skip to Main Content
              -  About                  - Careers
                - Commissioners
                - Contact
                - Reports and Publications
                - Securities Laws
                - Mission 
              -  Divisions & Offices                  - Corporation Finance
                - Enforcement
                - Investment Management
                - Economic and Risk Analysis
                - Trading and Markets
                - Examinations
                - Office of Administrative Law Judges
                - Regional Offices
                - All Divisions and Offices 
              -  Enforcement                  - Litigation Releases
                - Administrative Proceedings
                - Opinions and Adjudicatory Orders
                - Accounting and Auditing
                - Trading Suspensions
                - How Investigations Work
                - Receiverships
                - Information for Harmed Investors 
              -  Regulation                  - Rulemaking Index
                - Proposed Rules
                - Final Rules
                - Interim Final Rules
                - Other Orders and Notices
                - Self-Regulatory Organizations
                - Staff Interpretations 
              -  Education                  - Investor.gov
                - Five Questions to Ask Before You Invest
                - About Investment Professionals
                - Check Your Investment Professional
                - Investing Tools and Calculators
                - Investment Products
                - Understanding Fees
                - Investor Alerts and Bulletins
                - Glossary 
              -  Filings                  - EDGAR Search & Access
                - Company Filing Search
                - How to Search EDGAR
                - Requesting Public Documents
                - Forms List
                - Information for Filers
                - About EDGAR 
              -  News                  - Press Releases
                - Speeches and Statements
                - Spotlight Topics
                - Upcoming Events
                - Webcasts
                - SEC in the News
                - SEC Videos
                - Media Gallery 

# Open Meeting Agenda

## Tuesday, June 5, 2018

| **Item 1:** | **Optional Internet Availability of Investment Company Shareholder Reports** |
|-------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Office:     | Division of Investment Management                                            |
| Staff:      | Dalia Blass, Michael C. Pawluk, J. Matthew DeLesDernier, John Lee            |
||
### §79f. Transfer of property from Federal agency to administrative jurisdiction of Secretary

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any Federal property located within any of the areas described in sections 79b and 79c of this title may, with the concurrence of the head of the agency having custody thereof, be transferred without consideration to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary for use by him in carrying out the provisions of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 90–545, §6, Oct. 2, 1968, 82 Stat. 934.)
#### § 226.22 May grantees use grant funds for administrative costs?

State grantees may use up to five percent of their grant award for administrative expenses that include: indirect costs, evaluation, technical assistance, dissemination, personnel costs, and any other costs involved in administering the State's per-pupil facilities aid program.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7221d(b))
#### § 106.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to effectuate Title IX, which is designed to eliminate (with certain exceptions) discrimination on the basis of sex in any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance, whether or not such program or activity is offered or sponsored by an educational institution as defined in this part. This part is also intended to effectuate section 844 of the Education Amendments of 1974, Public Law 93-380, 88 Stat. 484.

[89 FR 33882, Apr. 29, 2024]
#### §§ 241.16-241.19 [Reserved]
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3011 and 11 U.S.C. 347, the trustee 

herein submits a check payable to "Clerk, United States Bankruptcy Court" representing 

unclaimed funds to be deposited by the Clerk of Court into the Treasury of the United States. Said 

funds are subject to withdrawal as provided by 28 U.S.C. 2042 and shall not escheat under any 

state law. The unclaimed funds represent the dividend(s) due and payable to:

Chapter 13

REPORT OF DEPOSIT OF UNCLAIMED FUNDS

In re: Letitia Danielle Smith

Letitia Danielle Smith

704 Log Fern Lane

Chesapeake, VA 23323

$1,854.53 

Dated: April 30, 2020 Chapter 13 Trustee

Norfolk Division

/s/ R. Clinton Stackhouse, Jr.

Case No.: 19-70754-FJS

Debtor's Name and Address Amount of Dividend

Case 19-70754-FJS Doc 52 Filed 04/30/20 Entered 04/30/20 11:14:00 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
January 12, 2012 

The Honorable Lisa P. Jackson 

Administrator, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20460 

Dear Administrator Jackson: 

As leading public health and medical organizations, we write to request that you move forward with the

Tier 3 vehicle emission and gasoline standards and finalize these standards as soon as possible. These 

new health protections are urgently needed as millions of Americans live in communities where polluted

air threatens their health and motor vehicles remain a major source of this pollution. 

On May 21, 2010, President Obama issued a memorandum that directed you to review the adequacy of 

current regulations of nitrogen oxides, air toxics and gasoline sulfur standards for new motor vehicles 

and if needed, to promulgate emissions regulations. It is clear that such new standards are needed to

protect public health and are extremely cost effective. 

According to a National Association of Clean Air Agencies study, a Tier 3 vehicle and fuels standard 

would reduce overall mobile source emissions of nitrogen oxides by 29%, carbon monoxide by 38% and 

volatile organic compounds by 26% by 2030. The state air pollution officials’ analysis indicates that, in 

2017, Tier 3 will reduce nitrogen oxide emissions by 260,000 tons, the equivalent to taking 33 million

cars off our nation’s roads. These benefits are a great bargain for the American people, costing less than 

one cent per gallon of gasoline and about 1⁄2 of a percent, or $150, of the cost of the average new car.

As communities work to provide clean and healthy air to their residents, these reductions are urgently

needed to protect the health of all, but especially the most vulnerable; children, seniors and people with 

chronic lung and heart disease. To protect public health, we ask that you move forward now with the 

Tier 3 vehicle and fuel standards. 

Sincerely, 

Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America 

American Heart Association 

American Lung Association 

American Thoracic Society 

Health Care Without Harm 

Physicians for Social Responsibility 

Trust for America's Health 

cc: Nancy Sutley, Chair, Council on Environmental Quality 

Heather Zichal, Deputy Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change 

Bob Perciasepe, Deputy Administrator, US EPA 

Gina McCarthy, Assistant Administrator, Office of Air and Radiation, US EPA 

 Margo Oge, Director, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, US EPA
### **CHAPTER 75—PASSPORTS AND VISAS**

Sec.
1541.
Issuance without authority.
1542.
False statement in application and use of passport.
1543.
Forgery or false use of passport.
1544.
Misuse of passport.
1545.
Safe conduct violation.
1546.
Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents.
1547.
Alternative imprisonment maximum for certain offenses.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–322, title XIII, §130009(b), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2030, added item 1547.

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–603, title I, §103(b), Nov. 6, 1986, 100 Stat. 3380, amended item 1546 generally, striking out "entry" before "documents".
EXHIBIT 16.1
                       LETTER FROM KABANI & COMPANY, INC.


KABANI & COMPANY, INC.
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


October 12, 2000

Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549

Re:  Inetvisionz.com, Inc.
     File No. 000-28845

Dear Sir or Madam:

We have read Item 5 "Changes in Registrant's  Certifying Accountant" of the Form
10-QSB of  Inetvisionz.com,  Inc.  dated August 21,  2000,  which we received on
October 10, 2000. We did not audit financial statements of Inetvisionz.com, Inc.
We agree with the statements contained therein,  including that we are no longer
the Independent Certified Public Accountants for any future filings.

Very truly yours,


/s/ Kabani & Company, Inc.
Kabani & Company, Inc.
Certified Public Accountants

cc:  Noreen Khan, President
     Inetvisionz.com, Inc.
IN THE

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

OF TEXAS

SHAUN DEVELLE BRIGGS §

§

VS. § Case Number No. 01-15-00269-CR

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS §

First Motion to Extend Time to File Brief

 Now comes Shaun Develle Briggs, appellant in the above-styled and numbered

cause, by and through assistant public defender, Jani J. Maselli Wood, and

respectfully moves the Court for an extension of time within which to file the

appellate brief, and for cause would show the Court as follows:

I.

On February 18, 2015, Mr. Briggs was convicted of the offense of aggravated

robbery and was sentenced to 15 years imprisonment in the Texas Department of

Criminal Justice - Institutional Division. He was convicted in cause

number1430016 in the 263rd District Court of Harris County, Texas, styled The

State of Texas v. Shaun Develle Briggs.

II.

The brief is currently due May 14, 2015. No extensions have been requested.

III.

Undersigned counsel is requesting 30 days from that due date until June 14,

2015.

ACCEPTED

01-15-00269-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

5/18/2015 3:34:46 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/18/2015 3:34:46 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
IV.

Counsel has been working on a murder appeal in State v. Joe Lee Bowden. The

record is lengthy;

On April 30, 2015, counsel filed a PDR in State v. Joshua London; 

On March 25, 2015, the Court of Criminal Appeals granted the State’s PDR

in Osmin Peraza v. State, NOS. PD-0100 & PD-0101-15. The CCA ordered expedited

briefing (15 days per side with no extensions of time permitted). Undersigned

counsel filed the brief on April 23, 2015. The CCA then set argument for May 20,

2015. This is also requiring additional time to prepare for argument.

Additionally, in January 2015, counsel made plans to attend a wedding and

graduation in Massachusetts from May 14-17, 2015. The tickets are nonrefundable.

V.

This request is made not to delay the proceedings, but to ensure that Mr. Briggs

is adequately represented. 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Mr. Briggs respectfully prays

that this undersigned counsel be designated as the attorney of record in this cause

and that the Court permit an extension of time until June 14, 2015.
Respectfully submitted,

ALEXANDER BUNIN

Chief Public Defender

Harris County Texas 

/s/ Jani Maselli Wood

_______________________

JANI J. MASELLI WOOD

Assistant Public Defender 

State Bar Number 00791195

Harris County Texas 

1201 Franklin, 13th Floor

Houston Texas 77002

(713) 368-0001

(713) 368-9278 (Fax)

Jani.Maselli@pdo.hctx.net

Attorney for Appellant,

Shaun Develle Briggs

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuant to Tex. R. App. Proc. 9.5, this certifies that on May 18, 2015, a

copy of the foregoing was emailed to counsel for the state (through texfile.com) at

the following address:

Alan Curry

Assistant District Attorney

1201 Franklin Street, 6th Floor

Houston, TX 77002

curry_alan@dao.hctx.net

/s/ Jani J Maselli Wood

___________________________________

JANI J. MASELLI WOOD
#### § 104.21 Discrimination prohibited.

No qualified handicapped person shall, because a recipient's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by handicapped persons, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity to which this part applies.
Maps Jarbidge Draft RMP/EIS 

August 2010 M-8 

Map 7. 303(d)-Listed Streams 

S n a k e R i v e r

S n a k e R i v e r

C l o v e r C r e e k

S a l m o

n

F a l l s

C r e

e k

J a r b i d g e

R i v

e r

51

Jackpot

93

ELKO

COUNTY

IDAHO IDAHO

NEVADA NEVADA

C e d a r C r e e

B

k

r u

n

e

a

u

R i v e r

EF Jarbidge

84

30

78

Buhl

Bliss

Bruneau

Hammett

Hagerman

Roseworth

King Hill

Castleford

Three Creek

Glenns

Ferry

Murphy Hot Springs

OWYHEE

COUNTY

TWIN FALLS

COUNTY

ELMORE

COUNTY

GOODING

COUNTY

0 1 5 0

Miles

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land

Management. The accuracy, reliability, or

completeness of these data for individual use

or aggregate use with other data is not guaranteed.

303(d)-Listed Streams Perennial Streams Intermittent Streams
#### § 630.203 Applicability.

The provisions of this regulation apply to all highway construction projects financed in whole or in part with Federal-aid highway funds and to be undertaken by a State or political subdivision.

[69 FR 7118, Feb. 13, 2004]
# Official Journal C 304/8 De

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 304 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 478 December 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 304

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 478 December 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 304/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2004/C 304/2 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/3439 — AGFA-GEVAERT/LASTRA) (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2004/C 304/3 | Information procedure — Technical rules (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2004/C 304/4 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3659 — Dresdner Bank/Cetelem S.A./JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 9 |
| 2004/C 304/5 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3638 — KKR/DSD) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 10 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 304/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2004/C 304/2

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/3439 — AGFA-GEVAERT/LASTRA) (
  1
  )

1

2

2004/C 304/3

Information procedure — Technical rules (
  1
  )

1

3

2004/C 304/4

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3659 — Dresdner Bank/Cetelem S.A./JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

9

2004/C 304/5

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3638 — KKR/DSD) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

10

---

| | III   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 304/6 | Calls for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and Strengthening the European Research Area’ | 11 |
| 2004/C 304/7 | Calls for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’ | 18 |

III   Notices

Commission

2004/C 304/6

Calls for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and Strengthening the European Research Area’

11

2004/C 304/7

Calls for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’

18

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2004/C 304/8 | Corrigendum to calls for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’( OJ C 296, 1.12.2004 ) | 26 |

Corrigenda

2004/C 304/8

Corrigendum to calls for proposals for indirect RTD actions under the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration: ‘Integrating and strengthening the European Research Area’( OJ C 296, 1.12.2004 )

( OJ C 296, 1.12.2004 )

26

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# •**.'k~** TOYOTATSUSHO AMERICA, INC. DETROIT OFFICE 4000 TOWN CENTER, SUITE 1260, SOUTHFIELD, MI 48075 PHONE: (248) 358-5460 FAX: (248) 357-2991 The Honorable Ray LaHood United States Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Secretary LaHood: OnbehalfofToyota Tsusho America Inc., I am writing to express our strong**,~!lpport** fot**theapplic~tion** ofDeltaAir Lines for new nonstop service between Detroit and Haneda. .... .. - .. - - . Approval ofDelta's new service would be a major benefit for our region, where many corporations have strong trade and market presence with Japan. There are over 500 Japanese companies located in Michigan and hundreds more whose business models rely on access to Japan and it's market. The growth ofour business ties with Japan has created demand for increased capacity to Tokyo. Our business travelers look to the convenience offlying into Tokyo's downtown Haneda airport. Detroit is a proven and successful gateway to Asia, and as an airport that can support trans-pacific routes. This summer Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the commitment Delta made to DTW to make itthe airlines gateway to Asia. The addition ofHaneda as a destination is a natural fit that would clearly benefit our businesstravelers. Thank you for consideration ofthis request.

... w ',:.', . '. ,j} '.'**"~,** -' .

, ..,**~** i··· ..

, , ';-.**',,~** ,"

HEAD OFFICE: 437 MADISON AVENUE, 29TH FLOOR, NEW YORK, N.Y. 1 0022·