alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §546. Establishment of Saint Helena Island National Scenic Area, Michigan

#### (a) Purpose

The purposes of sections 546 to 546a–5 of this title are—

(1) to preserve and protect for present and future generations the outstanding resources and values of Saint Helena Island in Lake Michigan, Michigan; and

(2) to provide for the conservation, protection, and enhancement of primitive recreation opportunities, fish and wildlife habitat, vegetation, and historical and cultural resources of the island.

#### (b) Establishment

For the purposes described in subsection (a), there shall be established the Saint Helena Island National Scenic Area (in sections 546 to 546a–5 of this title referred to as the "scenic area").

#### (c) Effective upon conveyance

Subsection (b) shall be effective upon conveyance of satisfactory title to the United States of the whole of Saint Helena Island, except that portion conveyed to the Great Lakes Lighthouse Keepers Association pursuant to section 1001 of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–324; 110 Stat. 3948).

(Pub. L. 106–431, §2, Nov. 6, 2000, 114 Stat. 1905.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1001 of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 1996, referred to in subsec. (c), is section 1001 of Pub. L. 104–324, title X, Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3948, which is not classified to the Code.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 106–431, §1, Nov. 6, 2000, 114 Stat. 1905, provided that: "This Act [enacting sections 546 to 546a–5 of this title] may be cited as the 'Saint Helena Island National Scenic Area Act'."
### §460dd–3. Administration, protection, and development; statutory authorities for conservation and management of natural resources; Glen Canyon Dam and Reservoir

The Secretary shall administer, protect, and develop the recreation area in accordance with the provisions of the Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535; 16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.),1 as amended and supplemented, and with any other statutory authority available to him for the conservation and management of natural resources to the extent he finds such authority will further the purposes of this subchapter: Provided, however, That nothing in this subchapter shall affect or interfere with the authority of the Secretary granted by Public Law 485, Eighty-fourth Congress, second session [43 U.S.C. 620 et seq.], to operate Glen Canyon Dam and Reservoir in accordance with the purposes of the Colorado River Storage Project Act [43 U.S.C. 620 et seq.] for river regulation, irrigation, flood control, and generation of hydroelectric power.

(Pub. L. 92–593, §4, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1312.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535; 16 U.S.C. 1 et seq.), referred to in text, is act Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, 39 Stat. 535, known as the National Park Service Organic Act, which enacted sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 100101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Sections 1 to 4 of the Act were repealed and restated as section 1865(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of Title 54 by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

Public Law 485, Eighty-fourth Congress, second session, referred to in text, is act Apr. 11, 1956, ch. 203, 70 Stat. 105, which is popularly known as the Colorado River Storage Project Act, and which is classified generally to chapter 12B (§620 et seq.) of Title 43, Public Lands. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 620 of Title 43 and Tables.

1 See References in Text note below.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 90285 / October 29, 2020

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-19597

In the Matter of

Bethany Liou and Golden California

Regional Center, LLC

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

ENTER AN ORDER APPROVING OR 

DISAPPROVING PLAN OF 

DISTRIBUTION

On September 2, 2020, pursuant to Rule 1103 of the United States Securities and 

Exchange Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans (the “Commission’s 

Rules”), 17 C.F.R.§ 201.1103, the Commission published a Notice of Proposed Plan of 

Distribution and Opportunity to Comment (“Notice”)1for the distribution of monies placed into 

a Fair Fund in the above-captioned matter. The Notice invited public comment on the proposed 

plan of distribution (“Plan”) through October 2, 2020, and the Commission received four (4)

public comments that raised various issues (the “Comments”).

Rule 1104 of the Commission’s Rules, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1104, provides in relevant part, 

“[t]he order approving or disapproving the plan should be entered within 30 days after the end of 

the final period allowed for comments on the proposed plan unless the Commission or the 

hearing officer, by written order, allows a longer period for good cause shown.”

Thirty (30) days from the end of the final period for comments on the Plan will lapse on 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 89755 (Sept. 2, 2020).
2

November 2, 2020. The Division requests additional time to present its recommendation to the 

Commission regarding the Comments and the Plan and has demonstrated good cause to extend 

the thirty (30) day time period, provided in Rule 1104 of the Commission’s Rules, with entry of 

an order extending time to approve or disapprove the Plan until January 29, 2021.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1104 of the Commission’s Rules,2

for good cause shown, the time for entering an order approving or disapproving the Plan is 

extended to January 29, 2021.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary

 

2

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1104.
<PAGE>



                                                                EXHIBIT (10)(k)


Employment-Severance Arrangement with Robert B. Fritsch

         In January 1996, the Company and Robert B. Fritsch agreed that Mr.
Fritsch would continue to serve as President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company until September 30, 1996 or until a new Chief Executive Officer was
employed, whichever came first. Under the terms of this arrangement, Mr.
Fritsch's salary was increased to $450,000 annually effective December 1, 1995;
a special bonus award of $112,000 was paid to Mr. Fritsch in January 1996; and
Mr. Fritsch received a payment of $240,000 the day the new Chief Executive
Officer began employment with the Company (June 1, 1996). This latter payment
was in lieu of any 1996 pro-rated bonus based on the annual incentive plan.
Between June 1, 1996 and December 31, 1996, Mr. Fritsch served in a transitional
role during which he continued to receive his salary and certain benefits. Upon
retirement, Mr. Fritsch also received title to his company automobile. Upon his
retirement, Mr. Fritsch agreed to provide consulting services to the Company
from January 1, 1997 through December 31, 1997 for a monthly fee of $3,333.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION** **1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION** **906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In  connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of **VisualMED  Clinical Solutions** (the “Company”) for the  quarter ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Philippe Rainville,  Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer of the  Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|   |   |   | */s/          Philippe Rainville*                                                                                  |
|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   | Philippe          RainvillePrincipal Financial Officer, PrincipalAccounting Officer and TreasurerFebruary 14, 2006 |

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78r), as amended.

 

----
### **PART IV—CORRECTION OF YOUTHFUL OFFENDERS**

Chap.
Sec.
401.
General provisions
5001
402.
Repealed
403.
Juvenile delinquency
5031

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §218(g), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2027, in item for chapter 402 substituted "Repealed" for "Federal Youth Corrections Act".

**1950**—Act Sept. 30, 1950, ch. 1115, §5(a), 64 Stat. 1090, added item for chapter 402.
### §1322. Injunctions

(a) In General.—A court having jurisdiction over actions under this chapter may grant injunctions in accordance with the principles of equity to prevent infringement of a design under this chapter, including, in its discretion, prompt relief by temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions.

(b) Damages for Injunctive Relief Wrongfully Obtained.—A seller or distributor who suffers damage by reason of injunctive relief wrongfully obtained under this section has a cause of action against the applicant for such injunctive relief and may recover such relief as may be appropriate, including damages for lost profits, cost of materials, loss of good will, and punitive damages in instances where the injunctive relief was sought in bad faith, and, unless the court finds extenuating circumstances, reasonable attorney's fees.

(Added Pub. L. 105–304, title V, §502, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2914.)
# C_2007211EN.01000602.xml

| 8.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 July 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret, Denmark) — Olicom A/S v Skatteministeriet

(Case C-142/06) (1)

1

(Common Customs Tariff - Tariff headings - Classification in the combined nomenclature - Automatic data processing machines - Combined network/modem cards - Definition of ‘specific function’)

(2007/C 211/10)

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Østre Landsret

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Olicom A/S

Applicant:

Defendant: Skatteministeriet

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Østre Landsret — Interpretation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1), as amended by Commission Regulation No 3009/95 of 22 December 1995 (OJ L 1995 L 319, p. 1) — Headings 8471 (automatic data-processing machines) and 8517 (telecommunication apparatus) — Network cards with double function, access to local area network and the Internet — Specific function

Operative part of the judgment

Combined cards designed to be inserted into portable computers must, after 1 January 1996, be classified as data-processing machines under heading 8471 of the Combined Nomenclature of the Common Customs Tariff, contained in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 3009/95 of 22 December 1995.

---

(1)  OJ C 143, 17.6.2006.

1

---
### **CHAPTER 67—MILITARY AND NAVY**

Sec.
1381.
Enticing desertion and harboring deserters.
1382.
Entering military, naval, or Coast Guard property.
[1383.
Repealed.]
1384.
Prostitution near military and naval establishments.
1385.
Use of Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Space Force as posse comitatus  1

1386.
Keys and keyways used in security applications by the Department of Defense.
1387.
Demonstrations at cemeteries under the control of the National Cemetery Administration and at Arlington National Cemetery.
1388.
Prohibition on disruptions of funerals of members or former members of the Armed Forces.
1389.
Prohibition on attacks on United States servicemen on account of service.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2021**—Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title X, §1045(b), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1905, substituted "Use of Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Space Force as posse comitatus" for "Use of Army and Air Force as posse comitatus" in item 1385.

**2009**—Pub. L. 111–84, div. E, §4712(b), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2843, added item 1389.

**2006**—Pub. L. 109–464, §1(b), Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3481, added item 1388.

Pub. L. 109–228, §3(b), May 29, 2006, 120 Stat. 389, added item 1387.

**1991**—Pub. L. 102–190, div. A, title X, §1090(b), Dec. 5, 1991, 105 Stat. 1486, added item 1386.

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXV, §3547, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4926, struck out item 1383 "Restrictions in military areas and zones".

**1956**—Act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §18(b), 70A Stat. 626, added item 1385.

1  So in original. Probably should be followed by a period.
§ 33.4 Investigation. ( a ) If an investigating official concludes that a subpoena pursuant to the authority conferred by 31 U.S.C. 3604(a) is warranted: ( 1 ) The subpoena so issued must notify the person to whom it is addressed of the authority under which the subpoena is issued and must identify the records or documents sought;
( 2 ) The investigating official may designate a person to act on his or her behalf to receive the documents sought; and
( 3 ) The person receiving the subpoena is required to tender to the investigating official or the person designated to receive the documents a certification that the documents sought have been produced, or that the documents are not available and the reasons therefore, or that the documents, suitably identified, have been withheld based upon the assertion of an identified privilege. (Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3804(a))
( b ) If the investigating official concludes that an action under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act may be warranted, the investigating official shall submit a report containing the findings and conclusions of the investigation to the reviewing official. (Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3803(a)(1))
( c ) Nothing in this section precludes or limits an investigating official's discretion to refer allegations directly to the Department of Justice for suit under the False Claims Act or other civil relief, or to defer or postpone a report or referral to the reviewing official to avoid interference with a criminal investigation or prosecution. (Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3809)
( d ) Nothing in this section modifies any responsibility of an investigating official to report violations of criminal law to the Attorney General.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3803(a)(1))
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4975 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4975

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1201 Sycamore Square Drive in Midlothian, Virginia, as the ``Dorothy 
                  Braden Bruce Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DOROTHY BRADEN BRUCE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1201 Sycamore Square Drive in Midlothian, Virginia, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Dorothy Braden Bruce Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dorothy 
Braden Bruce Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 14, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4975

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1201 Sycamore Square Drive in Midlothian, Virginia, as the ``Dorothy 
                  Braden Bruce Post Office Building''.
```
# CE2004065EN.01024301.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/243 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/243

---

(2004/C 65 E/259)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2898/03

by Helmut Kuhne (PSE) to the Commission

(1 October 2003)

Subject:   Possible unjustified use of EU funds in Spain

Subject:

A letter from an EU citizen has drawn my attention to the fact that, when the private housing estate on the Spanish coast known as ‘Alhama Candela’ was being expanded, EU funds were possibly used for a purpose other than the one for which they were actually intended.

According to my informant, the planning permission issued 30 years ago was granted solely on condition that the infrastructure was extended and improved. The then amount of DEM 2 million put up for that project by a German real estate purchaser was not used. In 1997, work was actually begun, but it was not completed. Nevertheless, the housing estate is being extended to include a new development involving the construction of more than 64 dwellings.

Electricity supply and road network conditions are described as catastrophic, with Iberdola, the electricity supply company, refusing to supply electricity. The apparent reason for its refusal to do so is that EU infrastructure payments were not paid as agreed.

The Commission:

| — | can the Commission confirm that EU aid for this project was actually approved and also paid; |
| --- | --- |

—

can the Commission confirm that EU aid for this project was actually approved and also paid;

| — | if so, was the grant subject to the condition set out above, and did the local authority duly comply with that condition? |
| --- | --- |

—

if so, was the grant subject to the condition set out above, and did the local authority duly comply with that condition?

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(3 November 2003)

(3 November 2003)

The information provided by the Honourable Member does not allow the time (the programming period) or place (the exact location, i.e. the region and site) of the project to be identified. As a result, it is not possible for the Commission to examine whether the project involved EU funding or not.

Nevertheless, given that this project appears to be in the housing sector, it should be pointed out that this sector is not eligible under the Structural Funds.

---
- Newsroom        - Press Releases
      - Public Statements
      - Speeches
      - Testimony
      - Spotlight Topics
      - Media Gallery
      - Upcoming Events
      - Webcasts
      - What's New
      - SEC Videos
      - Reports and Publications
      - RSS Feeds
      - Social Media 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

**TIME AND DATE:** Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, March 4, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.

**PLACE:** The meeting will be held in Auditorium LL-002 at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549.

**STATUS:** This meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public. Seating will be on a first-come, first-served basis. Visitors will be subject to security checks. The meeting will be webcast on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov.

**MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:** The Commission will consider whether to propose rule amendments that would simplify, harmonize, and improve certain aspects of the framework for exemptions from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 to promote capital formation while preserving or enhancing important investor protections.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:** For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman, Office of the Secretary, at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: February 26, 2020

Vanessa A. CountrymanSecretary
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Gary L. Whitlock, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric,LLC;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date:March 9, 2007                                                      /s/ Gary L. Whitlock   Gary L. Whitlock   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer