alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 280.11 Notice of intention to fine; procedure.

Notice of Intention to Fine, Form I-79, shall be prepared in triplicate, with one additional copy for each additional person on whom the service of such notice is contemplated. The notice shall be addressed to any or all of the available persons subject to fine. A copy of the notice shall be served by personal service on each such person. If the notice is delivered personally, the person upon whom it is served shall be requested to acknowledge such service by signing his name to the duplicate and triplicate copies. The officer effecting such service shall attest to the service by signing his name thereon and shall indicate thereon the date and place of service. If the person so served refuses to acknowledge service, or if service is made by leaving it at an office or mailing it, the person making such service shall indicate the method and date on the duplicate and triplicate copies of Form I-79, and shall sign his name upon such copies. The duplicate copy shall be retained by the district director of immigration and naturalization or the Associate Commissioner for Examinations, or the Director for the National Fines Office and the triplicate copy shall be delivered directly to the district director of customs for the district in which the vessel or aircraft is located, and the district director of customs shall withhold clearance until deposit is made or bond furnished as provided in the Immigration and Nationality Act. If the vessel or aircraft is located in a customs district which is outside the jurisdiction of the office of the Service having jurisdiction over the matter, the triplicate copy shall be forwarded to the office of the Service nearest such customs district for delivery to the district director of customs.

[22 FR 9807, Dec. 6, 1957, as amended at 32 FR 17651, Dec. 12, 1967; 37 FR 11471, June 8, 1972; 54 FR 18649, May 2, 1989]
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

November 1, 2001

DAILY CVP WATER SUPPLY REPORT

SEPTEMBER 30, 2001 RUN DATE:

RESERVOIR RELEASES IN CUBIC FEET/SECOND

TRINITY

SACRAMENTO

FEATHER

AMERICAN

STANISLAUS

SAN JOAQUIN

LEWISTON

KESWICK

OROVILLE (SWP)

NIMBUS

GOODWIN

FRIANT

RESERVOIR MEDIAN 2000 2001 15

 450

 6,365

 3,000

 1,499

 309

 236

 450

 7,610

 1,200

 1,486

 225

 201

RESERVOIR CAPACITY YR AVG

TRINITY

SHASTA

OROVILLE (SWP)

FOLSOM

NEW MELONES

FED. SAN LUIS

2000 2001

 1,791

 2,985

 1,920

 661

 1,804

 464

 1,428

 2,200

 1,488

 368

 1,481

 314

 15

STORAGE IN MAJOR RESERVOIRS IN THOUSANDS OF ACRE-FEET

MILLERTON 

TOT. N. CVP 

 212 188

 7,705 5,791

2,448

4,552

3,538

977

2,420

966

520

11,360

% OF 15YR AVG 

RESERVOIR

CURRENT

YR AVG

TRINITY

SHASTA

FOLSOM

NEW MELONES

1983

 2,888

 10,794

 6,541

 2,747

 788

 4,141

 1,244

 589

 15

MILLERTON 1,120 4,705

DRIEST % OF

ACCUMULATED INFLOW FOR WATER YEAR TO DATE IN THOUSANDS OF ACRE-FEET

WY WY 

WETTEST

WY 

YR

AVG

 15

2001 1977

DAM YR

RESERVOIR

CURRENT

TRINITY AT

FISH HATCHERY

SACRAMENTO AT

SHASTA DAM 

AMERICAN AT 

BLUE CANYON

STANISLAUS AT

NEW MELONES

1983

 58.58

 116.63

 105.60

 46.79

 0.00

 0.00

 0.00

 0.00

SAN JOAQUIN AT

HUNTINGTON LK 

 85.00 0.00

DRIEST 

ACCUMULATED PRECIPITATION FOR WATER YEAR TO DATE IN INCHES

WY WY 

WETTEST

WY 

% OF

2001 1977 AVG

AVG

(N YRS)

 225

 2,628

 356

 0

 377

 16.35

 26.44

 18.28

 0.00

 17.60

 22.66

 43.69

 40.04

 23.53

 32.35

 450

 6,537

 2,500

 1,503

 226

 196

 1,523 94

 2,409

 2,022

 471

 1,180

 268

 213

 5,851

 91

 74

 78

 126

 117

 88

 99

 32.85

 1,273

 5,681

 2,552

 1,000

 1,675

 62

 73

 49

 59

 67

 69

 63.41

 65.88

 26.83

 44.21

 69

 61

 88

 73

 39

 44

 26

 23

 26

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

 LAST 

24 HRS
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Q Comm International, Inc.
        (the " Company ")
        on
        Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission (" SEC ")
        on the
        date hereof (the " Report "),
        I,
        Michael D. Keough, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to
        18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will
        be
        retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
        request.
 
 
 /s/
        Michael D.
        Keough
 Michael
        D. Keough
 Chief
        Executive Officer and President
 
 November
        13, 2006
#### § 603.22 Inclusion on list.

Any State agency which desires to be listed by the Secretary as meeting the criteria set forth in § 603.24 should apply in writing to the Director, Division of Eligibility and Agency Evaluation, Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education, Washington, DC 20202.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1087-1(b))

[45 FR 86300, Dec. 30, 1980]
Exhibit
      10.24

    AMENDMENT
      TO EXECUTIVE

    EMPLOYMENT
      AGREEMENT

     

    WHEREAS,
      effective January 1, 2007, CAPITAL GOLD CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
      (“Employer”), and J. SCOTT HAZLITT, a Colorado resident (“Executive”), entered
      into an Executive Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”); and

    


    WHEREAS,
      on
      August
      29, 2007, based on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the
      Company’s Board of Directors, after review of an Executive Compensation Market
      Analysis and Report by an independent human
      resource professional services firm, the Board of Directors increased the
      salaries of our executive officers to be commensurate with industry
      standards;

    


    NOW,
      THEREFORE, to effectuate the foregoing change in salary for Executive, Employer
      and Executive agree: 

    


    1. Section
      3(a) of the Agreement is amended retroactively effective August 29, 2007 and,
      as
      amended, reads as follows:

    


    (a) Base
      Salary.
      As
      compensation for the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Employer
      agrees to pay Executive a base salary at an annual rate of not less than
      $135,000, payable in installments in accordance with Employer’s standard payroll
      practices, subject to such payroll and withholding deductions as are required
      by
      law or authorized by Executive. The amount of the base salary shall be reviewed
      periodically and may be increased at the sole discretion of Employer.


    


    2. All
      other
      terms of the Agreement remain the same.

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this amendment to the Agreement
      effective August 29, 2007. 

     

    
      	 	EMPLOYER
              : 


    

    
      	 	 	 
	 	CAPITAL GOLD CORPORATION
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	
            	By:  	s/Gifford
              A
              Dieterle
	 	
              

              Gifford
                A Dieterle, President

            
	 	 


      
        	 	 	 
	 	EXECUTIVE:
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	
              	s/ J.
                Scott Hazlitt 
	 	
                

                J.
                  Scott Hazlitt
#### § 370.46 What consultation requirement applies to a Governor of a State?

In designating a client assistance agency under § 370.2, redesignating a client assistance agency under § 370.10, and carrying out the other provisions of this part, the Governor shall consult with the director of the State vocational rehabilitation agency (or, in States with both a general agency and an agency for the blind, the directors of both agencies), the head of the developmental disability protection and advocacy agency, and representatives of professional and consumer organizations serving individuals with disabilities in the State.

(Authority: Section 112(c)(2) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 732(c)(2))
(March 17, 1943.)

#### Anthony Pawelek, Appellant, v. Rozalia Pawelek, Respondent.

Present — Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     9
<LEGEND>
RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                        413,903
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                              113,485
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 2,401,260
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                0
<LOANS>                                     4,819,555
<ALLOWANCE>                                  (151,367)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              7,933,816
<DEPOSITS>                                  6,732,999
<SHORT-TERM>                                  265,126
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           119,757
<LONG-TERM>                                    36,069
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      252,875
<OTHER-SE>                                    526,990
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              7,933,816
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               398,117
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             169,336
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                7,849
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              575,302
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            231,349
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            246,986
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         328,316
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   1,218
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                227
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               289,482
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               143,546
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    131,412
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  131,412
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.00
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   4.69
<LOANS-NON>                                    17,717
<LOANS-PAST>                                    2,926
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                23,100
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              156,896
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  25,416
<RECOVERIES>                                   18,669
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             151,367
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          151,367
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        45,869


</TABLE>
**Exhibit (32.2)**

**Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**
     For the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Paul A. Smith, the chief financial officer of ImperialOil Limited (the Company”), hereby certifies that to his knowledge:
(i)  the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: March 9, 2005  /s/ Paul A. Smith Paul A. Smith Controller and Senior Vice-President, Financeand Administration
! 
"#	

	 !"	#$%
&!
&
'
!(



)#
*+
),-
!)).)" . /	0&

&1


	

2&3"3 4


&
'
!(

)#



)#
1!


0#
!#11&&###
5# 6%%67	8
-
!



.
	0&


!&1
!	



)(,5,9:))


 )&
'
!(

)#
 # 	

	0&




!&1
!	
##
;781
'
!(

93#
&$!<


 !& 	!

!	
! #
1
.




=1


>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 


!!

'
!(

93#
&$2#!

,!&3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Feb 26 2019 /s/ Klinette Kindred

February 26, 2019

Case 18-13291-KHK Doc 72 Filed 02/26/19 Entered 02/26/19 16:02:38 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
("/5)(

2/=
")AB,5C

'
!(

)#
56

9:	



2
B#D3

'
(
)#


E#3(

(#
FE%

 -!G6

7%8EEF

0

#D3H#!0






(,,B5,,

=,5/",C=,GC,(

+5C

9: 
 !"

+
/I 

$J/I =



%%
K
(

(#
%6

 -!G6

7%8E6%%

3.H$ 4
&.

#

/=,()/

=!" G !

+ !

6E/ !+ 5!


 G%

#

+
/I 

$J/I =



%%
K
(

(#
%6

 -!G6

#

5
+&
$

+&
$JK
=CC

E%5	




GG

$%

2
B#D3



'
!(

)#


/11&1
'
(
)#


E#3(

(#
FE%

 -!G6

	&'($

=1

Case 18-13291-KHK Doc 72 Filed 02/26/19 Entered 02/26/19 16:02:38 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
### The Liberty Foundation B -17 Exemption t

. Cindy Nord lie, 

### Luc1ano Lucero o Ke·ra Jones AFS-003, Technical Advisor
- Field Operations : 1 Cc : Robert Carty 05117/2012 09:37AM



# ·-------**·· ~~--** **~--- ----** **-----·-·** 

# _ ............. ... ,...... .. ..... .... . Yesterday I received a phone call from Ray Fowler, The Liberty Foundation Execut i ve Director, in regards to his exemption amendment request and how it appears to have been denied based on the existing moratorium

. AFS has determined that this was not the intent of the moratorium and wou l d like to have the exemption amended

. Thanks, Luciano A. Lucero "Lucky" Senior Technical Advisor Office of the Director of Flight Standards 202-267-9935
# Official Journal C 188/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 188 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4911 August 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 188

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4911 August 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 188/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 188/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4327 — Egis/Alpine/Hochtief-Austrian Highway A5) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 2 |
| 2006/C 188/3 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4214 — Alcatel/Lucent Technologies) (1) | 3 |
| 2006/C 188/4 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4204 — Cinven/UPC France) (1) | 3 |
| 2006/C 188/5 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4313 — Goldman Sachs/Borealis/GICSI/Associated British Ports (II)) (1) | 4 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 188/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 188/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4327 — Egis/Alpine/Hochtief-Austrian Highway A5) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

2

2006/C 188/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4214 — Alcatel/Lucent Technologies) (1)

3

2006/C 188/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4204 — Cinven/UPC France) (1)

3

2006/C 188/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4313 — Goldman Sachs/Borealis/GICSI/Associated British Ports (II)) (1)

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940

Release No. 34055 / October 20, 2020

__________________________________________________________________

In the Matter of :

:

ARCA U.S. TREASURY FUND :

ARCA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC :

:

4151 Redwood Ave. :

Suite 206 :

Los Angeles, CA 90066 :

:

:

(812-15145) :

__________________________________________________________________:

ORDER UNDER SECTIONS 6(c) AND 23(c)(3) OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT 

OF 1940 GRANTING AN EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF RULE 23c-3 

UNDER THE ACT

Arca U.S. Treasury Fund and Arca Capital Management, LLC filed an application on July 22, 

2020, and an amendment to the application on September 10, 2020. Applicants requested an 

order under sections 6(c) and 23(c)(3) of the Act for an exemption from certain provisions of rule 

23c-3 under the Act. The order would permit certain registered closed-end management 

investment companies to make repurchase offers on a monthly basis.

On September 24, 2020, a notice of the filing of the application was issued (Investment 

Company Act Release No. 34026). The notice gave interested persons an opportunity to request 

a hearing and stated that an order disposing of the application would be issued unless a hearing 

was ordered. No request for a hearing has been filed, and the Commission has not ordered a 

hearing.

The matter has been considered and it is found, on the basis of the information set forth in the 

application, as amended, that granting the requested exemption is appropriate in the public 

interest, and consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the 

policy and provisions of the Act.

It is further found that the proposed purchases will be made in a manner or on a basis which does 

not unfairly discriminate against any holders of the class or classes of securities to be purchased. 
2

Accordingly, in the matter of Arca U.S. Treasury Fund and Arca Capital Management, LLC (File 

No. 812-15145),

IT IS ORDERED, under sections 6(c) and 23(c)(3) of the Act, that the requested exemption from 

certain provisions of rule 23c-3 is granted, effective immediately, subject to the conditions 

contained in the application, as amended.

For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, under delegated authority.

J. Matthew DeLesDernier

Assistant Secretary
### §943. Tissue bank

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall coordinate existing facilities for the storage, preparation, examination, and archiving of tissues from selected Great Lakes fish and wildlife, which shall be known as the "Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Tissue Bank".

#### (b) Guidance

The Secretary shall, in consultation with appropriate Federal and State agencies and the Council of Great Lakes Research Managers, issue guidance, after an opportunity for public review and comment, for Great Lakes fish and wildlife tissue collection, preparation, archiving, quality control procedures, and access that will ensure—

(1) appropriate uniform methods and standards for those activities to provide confidence in Great Lakes fish and wildlife tissue samples used for research;

(2) documentation of procedures used for collecting, preparing, and archiving those samples; and

(3) appropriate scientific use of the tissues in the Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Tissue Bank.

(Pub. L. 102–440, title II, §202, Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2233.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 102–440, title II, §201, Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2233, provided that: "This title [enacting this chapter] may be cited as 'The Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Tissue Bank Act'."
EXHIBIT
      10.1

     

    
      		GE Healthcare
              Financial Services


    

    
      
        

      

    

    


    AMENDMENT
      TO SCHEDULE DATED AS OF 06/24/2003

    TO
      MASTER LEASE AGREEMENT
      DATED AS OF
      06/24/2003

    INTERNAL
      CONTRACT REFERENCE NUMBER
      8528103

    


    This
      is
      an Amendment dated as of 10/15/2007
      to
      the
      Schedule and Master Lease Agreement
      referenced above between General Electric Capital Corporation
      (“Lessor”)
      and
      The Sagemark Companies, LTD. (“Lessee’).
      

    


    The
      Term
      of Schedule and Monthly Installment Sections are hereby amended as
      follows:

    


    Original
      - Term Of Schedule: 84 Months

    


    Amended
      - Term of Schedule: 87 Months 

     

    Original
      - Monthly Installment: 3 Months @ $0.00, 6 Months @ $15,656.35, 75 Months @
      $31,436.61; plus applicable taxes

     

    Amended
      - Monthly Installment: 3 Months @ $0.00, 6 Months @ $15,656.35, 24 Months @
      $31,436.61, 3 Months @ $9,430.77 (Monthly Interest Payment), 51 Months @
      $31,436.61; plus applicable taxes

     

    


    EXCEPT
      AS
      PROVIDED IN THIS AMENDMENT, ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE ABOVE
      REFERENCED SCHEDULE REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT AS ORIGINALLY
      WRITTEN.

    

      
        	
                Lessor:

              	
                Lessee:

              
	 	 
	
                General
                  Electric Capital Corporation

              	
                The
                  Sagemark Companies, LTD.

              
	 	 
	
                By:
                  /s/ David Handke

              	
                By:
                  /s/ George W. Mahoney

              
	 	 
	
                Name:
                  David Handke

              	
                Print
                  Name: George W. Mahoney

              
	 	 
	
                Title:
                  Duly Authorized Signatory

              	
                Title:
                  Chief Financial Officer
#### § 101.34 Service—how made.

Service shall be made by personal delivery of one copy to each person to be served or by mailing by first-class mail, properly addressed with postage prepaid. When a party or amicus has appeared by attorney or other representative, service upon such attorney or representative will be deemed service upon the party or amicus. Documents served by mail preferably should be mailed in sufficient time to reach the addressee by the date on which the original is due to be filed, and should be air mailed if the addressee is more than 300 miles distant.