alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CVC Water Delivery Records

Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Red indicates Scheduled Data Green indicates Confirmed Delivery Data Contract Water Year Allocated Supply = 100%

Blue indicates Actual Data Deliveries to or on Behalf of CVC Contractors (Includes Allocated Supply or Acquired Water)

Jun-17

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Banks 

AF

Article 55 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Banks 

AF

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Tracy 

AF

CVC Water 

Pumped @ 

O'Neill 

AF

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Dos 

Amigos for 

Delivery 

AF

3% Loss 

Between 

Banks and 

O'Neill 

Based on 

Actual 

Pumping

Exchange 

from USBR 

to DWR in 

O'Neill

Exchange 

from DWR 

to USBR in 

O'Neill

Tri Valley 

Delivered from 

Millerton 

1,142 AF

County of Tulare 

Delivered from 

Millerton 

5,308 AF

Kern-Tulare 

acquired San Luis 

WD CVP Wtr to 

Kern County 

Water Agency 

(SOD-17-509 & 

SWPAO#16307 

or 17301) 

19,250 AF

6/1/2017

6/2/2017

6/3/2017

6/4/2017

6/5/2017

6/6/2017

6/7/2017

6/8/2017

6/9/2017

6/10/2017

6/11/2017

6/12/2017

6/13/2017

6/14/2017

6/15/2017

6/16/2017

6/17/2017

6/18/2017

6/19/2017

6/20/2017

6/21/2017

6/22/2017

6/23/2017 500 AF 500 AF 428 AF

6/24/2017 500 AF 500 AF 428 AF

6/25/2017 500 AF 500 AF 428 AF

6/26/2017 500 AF 500 AF 428 AF

6/27/2017 500 AF 500 AF 428 AF

6/28/2017 500 AF 500 AF 428 AF

6/29/2017 500 AF 500 AF 428 AF

6/30/2017 500 AF 500 AF 172 AF 445 AF 429 AF

Jun 2017 Total 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 4,000 AF 0 AF 4,000 AF 0 AF 172 AF 445 AF 3,425 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF

Notes: 575 AF of the 4,000 AF exchanged & pumped at CVC Dos Amigos will be delivered in July 2017.

Contract Water Year 2017 (Mar 1, 2017 to Feb 28, 2018 Deliveries to or on behalf of CVC Contractor (Includes Allocated Supply or Acquired Water)

Mar 1, 2017 to 

Jun 30, 2017 CVC Banks Art 55 at Banks

CVC at 

Tracy

CVC at 

O'Neill

CVC at Dos 

Amigos

Losses 

Banks to 

O'Neill

Exchange 

USBR to 

DWR

Exchange 

DWR to 

USBR

County of Fresno County of Tulare Hills Valley Tri Valley Kern-Tulare Lower Tule Pixley Total Delivered

Year to Date Contract 

Wtr Yr Total 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 4,000 AF 0 AF 4,000 AF 0 AF 0 AF 445 AF 0 AF 204 AF 3,425 AF 0 AF 0 AF 4,074 AF

Note: A total of 649 AF of deliveries were made from Millerton.

V:\~WATER\~SMITH\Cross Valley Contractor Deliveries Info\03-2017 to 02-2018\Master 03_2017 to 02_2018 CVC Deliveries.xlsx 4/9/2018 11:58 AM
Summary: BIA Seasonal Firefighter Sexually Harassed and 

Inappropriately Touched BIA Employee 

Report Date: April 13, 2020 Report Number: 19-0585 

We investigated allegations that a Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) seasonal firefighter sexually 

harassed and inappropriately touched a BIA employee. The employee alleged that the firefighter 

had harassed her since 2009. She further alleged that in 2019, while at work, the firefighter 

inappropriately touched her, used sexually explicit language, and left her a handwritten note 

proposing a sexual relationship. The employee said she told the firefighter to stop on multiple 

occasions and decided to report him after the 2019 incident. 

We determined that the firefighter’s behavior toward the employee was unwelcome and based on 

her sex and that his comments, written note, and conduct could reasonably be considered to have 

adversely affected her work environment. Therefore, we concluded that the firefighter’s conduct 

violated DOI Personnel Bulletin No. 18-01, the Department’s policy on preventing and 

eliminating harassing conduct. The firefighter denied making sexually explicit comments to the 

BIA employee, but admitted to hugging her on occasion and writing her the note to see if she 

was interested in him sexually. 

We found that BIA management took appropriate and timely action and addressed the reported 

misconduct in accordance with DOI policy. We referred this case to the U.S. Attorney’s Office 

for the District of New Mexico, which declined to prosecute. 

This is a summary of an investigative report we issued to the BIA Director. 

Office of Investigations | Office of Inspector General | U.S. Department of the Interior | Washington, DC
### §671. Repealed and Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was a composite of provisions in acts May 23, 1908, ch. 192, 35 Stat. 267, and Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 301, 35 Stat. 1051. The provision in act May 23, 1908, ch. 192, which authorized President to reserve and except 12,800 acres for a permanent National Bison Range in Montana, was repealed by Pub. L. 116–260, div. DD, §12(g), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 3032. The provision in act Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 301, which directed President to reserve and except a sufficient area to enlarge the Range to not to exceed 20,000 acres, was omitted in view of the probable intent to repeal the entirety of this section by section 12(g) of div. DD of Pub. L. 116—260.
----

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 21 October 2004

in Case C-8/03 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Bruxelles (Belgium)): Banque Bruxelles Lambert SA (BBL) v Belgian State (1)

(Sixth VAT Directive - Articles 4 and 9(2)(e) - Concept of taxable person - Place where services are supplied - SICAV)

(2004/C 300/33)

Language of the case: French

In Case C-8/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Tribunal de première instance de Bruxelles (Belgium) (Brussels Court of First Instance), made by decision of 24 December 2002, received at the Court on 10 January 2003, in the proceedings between Banque Bruxelles Lambert SA (BBL) and Belgian State — the Court (First Chamber), composed of: P. Jann, President of the Chamber, A. Rosas, R. Silva de Lapuerta, K. Lenaerts and S. von Bahr (Rapporteur), Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 21 October 2004, in which it has ruled:

Open-ended investment companies (SICAVs) which have as their sole object the collective investment in transferable securities of capital raised from the public in accordance with Council Directive 85/611/EEC of 20 December 1985 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) are taxable persons within the meaning of Article 4 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes – Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, so that, where services referred to in Article 9(2)(e) of that directive are supplied to such SICAVs which are established in a Member State other than that of the supplier of the services, the place where those services are provided is the place where the SICAVs have established their business.

----

(1)OJ C 44 of 22.2.2003.

----
§ 300.715 Annual reports. ( a ) *In general.* The advisory board established under § 300.714 must prepare and submit to the Secretary of the Interior and to Congress an annual report containing a description of the activities of the advisory board for the preceding year.
( b ) *Availability.* The Secretary of the Interior must make available to the Secretary the report described in paragraph (a) of this section.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1411(h)(7))
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CAROLINA INVESTMENT PARTNERS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          33,338
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      103
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,822,183
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,855,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,056
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,818,568
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,855,624
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,158
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                41,455
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,297
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
§ 361.415 What entity serves as the one-stop partner for a particular program in the local area? ( a ) The entity that carries out the program and activities listed in § 361.400 or § 361.410, and therefore serves as the one-stop partner, is the grant recipient, administrative entity, or organization responsible for administering the funds of the specified program in the local area. The term “entity” does not include the service providers that contract with, or are subrecipients of, the local administrative entity. For programs that do not include local administrative entities, the responsible State agency must be the partner. Specific entities for particular programs are identified in paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section. If a program or activity listed in § 361.400 is not carried out in a local area, the requirements relating to a required one-stop partner are not applicable to such program or activity in that local one-stop delivery system.
( b ) For title II of WIOA, the entity or agency that carries out the program for the purposes of paragraph (a) of this section is the sole entity or agency in the State or outlying area responsible for administering or supervising policy for adult education and literacy activities in the State or outlying area. The State eligible entity or agency may delegate its responsibilities under paragraph (a) of this section to one or more eligible providers or consortium of eligible providers.
( c ) For the VR program, authorized under title I of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended by WIOA title IV, the entity that carries out the program for the purposes of paragraph (a) of this section is the designated State agencies or designated State units specified under sec. 101(a)(2) of the Rehabilitation Act that is primarily concerned with vocational rehabilitation, or vocational and other rehabilitation, of individuals with disabilities.
( d ) Under WIOA title I, the national programs, including Job Corps, the Native American program, YouthBuild, and Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker programs are required one-stop partners. The entity for the Native American program, YouthBuild, and Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker programs is the grantee of those respective programs. The entity for Job Corps is the Job Corps center.
( e ) For the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006, the entity that carries out the program for the purposes of paragraph (a) of this section is the eligible recipient or recipients at the postsecondary level, or a consortium of eligible recipients at the postsecondary level in the local area. The eligible recipient at the postsecondary level may also request assistance from the State eligible agency in completing its responsibilities under paragraph (a) of this section.
SERVED: FEBRUARY 7, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIO^^^^j^icanD^^^^ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS y-'fVf:f OPfRAJC 

WASHINGTON, DC •" " ^' 

im FEB -8 P 1^ 4 3 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CONRAD RZEWUSKl 

FAA DOCKET NO [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMSNO. FAA-2012-0021 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 201 iWP070186) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

-. . Chief A 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMSNo. FAA-2012-002 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Conrad Rzewuski, Respondent 

7360 W. Via Del Sol 

Glendale, AZ85310 

TEL: 623-451-6384 

Adam Runkel, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, AWP-7.12 

Western-Pacific Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7142 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Ad visor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Semce was by U.S. Miiil. Forsen'ice in person or by expedited courier use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Adniinistralion, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wriglil Building—Suite 2WIO0O, Washington, 

DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-t30. 

- 2 -
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS RULINGS

Release No. 6903/April 19, 2023

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20898

In the Matter of :

:

PETROTEQ ENERGY, INC., and : ORDER

ALEKSANDR BLYUMKIN :

The Securities and Exchange Commission instituted this proceeding with an Order 

Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings (OIP), pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 

1933 and Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, on June 13, 2022. Pursuant to 

Respondents’ Offers of Settlement, the OIP made various findings of fact and conclusions of law;

imposed cease-and-desist orders, undertakings, remedial sanctions, and civil penalties; and ordered 

a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge to determine what, if any, disgorgement and 

prejudgment interest are appropriate as to Respondent Blyumkin. 

Under consideration is the joint motion of the Division of Enforcement and Aleksandr 

Blyumkin to extend the existing scheduling deadlines that include a due date of April 17, 2023, for 

motions for summary disposition. See Petroteq Energy, Inc., Admin. Proceeding Release No. 6883, 

2022 SEC LEXIS 3131 (A.L.J. Nov. 22, 2022). The parties advise that they are actively negotiating 

a possible resolution of the remaining issues and request a two-week extension of the due date for 

motions for summary disposition and responsive pleadings. The requested extension will facilitate 

settlement and conserve public and private resources. Accordingly, the parties should file motions 

for summary disposition, oppositions, and replies by May 1, May 22, and May 30, 2023, 

respectively. The remaining procedural dates remain unchanged.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/S/ Carol Fox Foelak 

Carol Fox Foelak

Administrative Law Judge
### §757e. Application to Columbia River basin

Sections 757a to 757f of this title shall not be construed to affect, modify, or apply to the same area as the provisions of sections 755 to 757 of this title. The State of Idaho shall be eligible on an equal standing with other States for Federal funding for purposes authorized by sections 757a to 757f of this title.

(Pub. L. 89–304, §5, Oct. 30, 1965, 79 Stat. 1126; Pub. L. 98–146, title I, Nov. 4, 1983, 97 Stat. 922.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Although the intent of Congress to amend this section is clear from the directory language of Pub. L. 98–146 which states that the sentence relating to the eligibility of the State of Idaho be added to "16 U.S.C. 757e", that directory language has been editorially interpreted as directing the addition of that sentence to section 5 of Pub. L. 89–304, because Title 16 of the United States Code [this title] has never been enacted into positive law and its sections are therefore not susceptible of amendment as sections of "16 U.S.C.—" and because section 5 of Pub. L. 89–304 is the statute which was classified to, and serves as the source for 16 U.S.C. 757e [this section].

#### Amendments

1983—Pub. L. 98–146 inserted provision that the State of Idaho shall be eligible on an equal standing with other States for Federal funding for purposes authorized by sections 757a to 757f of this title.
### §15. Obligation or other security of foreign government defined

The term "obligation or other security of any foreign government" includes, but is not limited to, uncanceled stamps, whether or not demonetized.

(Added Pub. L. 85–921, §3, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1771.)
exv10w27



 





EXHIBIT 10.27




Monsanto Company Recoupment Policy

(As Amended and Restated October 23, 2007)



In the event the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material
noncompliance of the Company with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, as
a result of misconduct (as determined by the members of the Board of Directors who are considered
“independent” for purposes of the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange) each of the
Company’s “Specified Executive Officers” shall reimburse the Company for any incentive award made
to such executive officer on the basis of having met or exceeded specific targets for performance
periods occurring in whole or in part during the 12-month period following the first public
issuance or filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (whichever first occurs) of the
financial document embodying such financial reporting requirement for periods beginning after
August 31, 2006. For purposes of this policy, (i) the term “incentive awards” means awards under
the Company’s Annual Incentive Plans and Long-Term Incentive Plans, the amount of which is
determined in whole or in part upon specific performance targets relating to the financial results
of the Company; and (ii) the term “Specified Executive Officers” means the Company’s President and
Chief Executive Officer; Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Seminis CEO;
Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer; Executive Vice President, Strategy and
Operations; Executive Vice President, Global Commercial; Executive Vice President, Manufacturing;
Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel; and Vice President and Controller. From and
after September 1, 2006, the award statement or terms and conditions of any incentive award by the
Company to a Specified Executive Officer shall include a provision incorporating the requirements
of this policy.
FINANCIAL 

AID TOOLKIT A New Resource for Organizations That Prepare

Students and Families Financially for College

Federal Student Aid (FSA) recently launched the Financial Aid Toolkit (FinancialAidToolkit.ed.gov). The toolkit consolidates 

FSA resources into a searchable online database intended for use by organizations and individuals who interact with, 

support, or counsel students and families on making financial preparations for postsecondary education. While the toolkit’s 

target audience is high school counselors and college access professionals, financial aid administrators may also find toolkit 

resources useful for their student outreach efforts.

Key Feature: The “Search Tools and Resources” Function

Use the toolkit’s search function to find and sort resources by

• audience,

• topic,

• time of year for best use, and

• type of resource.

Simply visit the Search Tools and Resources page at 

FinancialAidToolkit.ed.gov/resources.

Examples of the kinds of resources in the toolkit include

• outreach resources such as financial-aid-night materials,

fact sheets, videos, infographics, and PowerPoint

presentations;

• suggested messages for social media in the form of tweets,

Facebook posts, and blog posts;

• information on embedding videos and infographics in your

website;

• sample articles for organization newsletters and sample e-mails; and

• FSA publications.

You can also subscribe to an RSS feed to receive notification when resources are updated or are added to the website.

Other Site Features

In addition to the search-resources function, the toolkit includes the following sections:

• Learn About Financial Aid provides tips and resources to help counselors, college access professionals, and other

mentors obtain a basic understanding of financial aid and the federal aid application process. This section includes

updates on the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSASM) and basic information about loan repayment.

• Conduct Outreach features key outreach topics and resources that are of interest to school counselors and mentors. Topics

include hosting a financial-aid night, reaching certain target audiences (e.g., parents, military), using social media, and more.

• Get Training shares information about such professional development opportunities as classroom training, webinars, and

resources for self-instruction. This section includes information about the National Training for Counselors and Mentors

(NT4CM) initiative.

Explore the Financial Aid Toolkit at FinancialAidToolkit.ed.gov

® Printed December 2013
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Francis PORRINI, aka “Jay”, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 01-1060.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 14, 2002.

*20Patrick S. Bristol, Santos & Seeley, Hartford, CT, for Appellant.

Robert M. Spector, Ass’t U.S. Att’y, D. Conn., New Haven, CT, for Appellee.

Present FEINBERG, KEARSE and B.D. PARKER, Jr., Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, and was argued by counsel.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the order of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Thompson’s Ruling on Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss, dated January 18, 2001.

We agree with the district court’s conclusion that the two conspiracies are not the same offense for the purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause. *See United States v. Macchia,*35 F.3d 662, 668 (2d Cir.1994). Furthermore, even if they were the same offense, the denial of community release would not qualify as a punishment that could invoke double jeopardy protection. “The Double Jeopardy Clause applies to judicial proceedings, not parole .... A denial of parole is a decision to withhold early release from the confinement component of a sentence. It is neither the imposition nor the increase of a sentence, and it is not punishment for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause ____” *Alessi v. Quinlan,*711 F.2d 497, 501 (2d Cir.1983) (internal quotation marks omitted).

We have considered all of defendant’s contentions on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.