alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

COMMISSION DECISION

of 29 April 2004

amending the Appendix B to Annex VIII to the 2003 Act of Accession to include certain animal by-products establishments in Latvia in the list of establishments in transition

(notified under document number C(2004) 1737)

(Text with EEA relevant)

(2004/467/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the Treaty of Accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia, and in particular Article 2(3) thereof,

Having regard to the Act of Accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia, and in particular Annex VIII, Chapter 4, Section B, Subsection I, point 2, paragraph (d) thereto,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1.   The establishments listed in the Annex to this Decision are added to the Appendix B referred to in Chapter 4, Section B, Subsection I, point 2 to Annex VIII to the 2003 Act of Accession.

2.   For the establishments listed in the Annex, the rules foreseen in Annex VIII, Chapter 4, Section B, Subsection I, point 2, paragraph (b) to the Act of Accession are applicable.

3.   The establishments listed in Annex are subject to transitional measures in relation to Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 until the date indicated for each establishment.

Article 2

This Decision shall apply subject to and as from the date of the entry into force of the Treaty of Accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 April 2004.

For the Commission

David BYRNE

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 273, 10.10.2002, p. 1.

----

ANNEX

Animal by-product establishments in transition

----
§ 330.1 Eligibility. To be eligible for naturalization under section 330 of the Act, an applicant must establish that he or she: ( a ) Has been lawfully admitted as a permanent resident of the United States;
( b ) Has served honorably or with good conduct, during such periods of lawful residence, in a capacity other than as a member of the Armed Forces of the United States, on board: ( 1 ) A vessel operated by the United States, or an agency thereof, the full legal and equitable title to which is in the United States; or
( 2 ) A vessel, whose home port is the United States, and ( i ) Which is registered under the laws of the United States; or
( ii ) The full legal and equitable title to which is in a citizen of the United States, or a corporation organized under the laws of any of the several States of the United States;
( c ) Served in the capacity specified in paragraph (b) of this section within five years immediately preceding the date on which the applicant filed the application for naturalization, or on which the alien is examined, if the application was filed early pursuant to section 334(a) of the Act.
( d ) Has been, during the five years preceding the filing of the application for naturalization, or the examination on the application if the application was filed early under section 334(a) of the Act, and continues to be, of good moral character, attached to the principles of the Constitution of the United States, and favorably disposed toward the good order and happiness of the United States. ( 1 ) An applicant is presumed to satisfy the requirements of this paragraph during periods of service in accordance with paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, as reflected by the records and certificates submitted by the applicant under § 330.2(b).
( 2 ) An applicant must demonstrate that he or she satisfies the requirements of this paragraph for those required periods when that applicant did not perform service in accordance with paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section; and
( e ) Has complied with all other requirements for naturalization as provided in part 316 of this chapter, except that, for purposes of the residence requirements under paragraphs § 316.2 (a)(3) and (a)(4) of this chapter, service satisfying the conditions of this section shall be considered as residence and physical presence within the United States.
[56 FR 50493, Oct. 7, 1991]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA 

FIFTH DISTRICT 

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME 

EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR 

REHEARING AND DISPOSITION 

THEREOF IF FILED

CALVA HASKELL, 

Petitioner, 

v.

Case No. 5D23-0898

LT Case No. 2009-CF-002359

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Respondent. 

________________________________/

Opinion filed March 10, 2023 

Petition for Belated Appeal,

A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Calva Haskell, Bushnell, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, 

and, Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant 

Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for 

Respondent.

PER CURIAM. 

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall

be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the

August 17, 2022 order denying motion to correct illegal sentence filed in 
2

Case No. 2009-CF-002359, Lake County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED. 

JAY, HARRIS and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.
#### § 338.2 Execution in case name is changed.

Whenever the name of an applicant has been changed by order of a court as a part of a naturalization, the clerk of court, or his or her authorized deputy, shall forward a copy of the order changing the applicant's name with the notifications required by part 339 of this chapter. The Certificate of Naturalization will be issued to the applicant in the name as changed.

[56 FR 50501, Oct. 7, 1991]
[4910-I3-P)

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA nON Federal Aviation Administration

OUTING S~M80L

oun"(; SYM60l AtJPl-I2.QS 

### Pif 

# 5:Af'w<G flF 

# "Z IS/tOIO 

# ,- AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
747-100B, 747-200B, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400F, and 747SP series Rolls-Royce RB211-524 Series Engines

airplanes. This AD requires repetitive detailed and high frequency eddy current inspections oftlle forward and aft sides ofthe strut front spar chord for cracks and 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400F, and 747SP Series Airplanes Equipped with

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments. SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Model 

# .;x 14 CFR ParI 39 

# 00Lj

/ ,~~\I fl,~ (Docket No. FAA-2010-++++j Directorate Identifier 2010-I\TM-130-AD;Amendmen 

### wtW'lDt'I 

## ,,\6~*;AD

# *'i'-:2 0

# l()- r

# Y- Dq "&1cj-IO RIN 2120-AA64 I Ainvorthincss Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747-100B, 747-200B,

fractures at each strut location, and corrective actions ifnecessary. This AD results from 

# ,tb p reports ofcracks and fractures inthe nacelie strLitfront spar chord assembly. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracks and ~ractures ofthe nacelle strut front spar 

# I chord assembly. Fracture ofthe front spar chord assembly could lead to loss ofthe strut upper link load path and consequent fracture of the diagonal brace, which could result in in-flight separation ofthe strut and engine from the airplane. DATES: This AD is effective [INSERT DATE 15DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION [NTHE FEDERAL REGISTER]. 

### -ICQ 

# o

## 1491O-13-PJ

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 -Ot<Cl)RR~~CES OuTING SYMBOl. flIJi'C)-1\ 

### cj [NlTIJll.Si$l(; {Docket No. FAA-10lO-++++; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-130-AD; Amcndmcn 

### u.,)Hr.ol5.{:() 39-**; AD **J RIN 2120-AA64 Ainvorthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747wlOOB, 747-200B, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400F, and 747SP Series Airplanes Equipped with Rolls-Royce RR211 fiS24 Series Engines AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT ACTION: Final rule; request for comments. SUMMARY: We are adopting anew ainvorthiness directive (AD) for'certain Model 747,100B, 747-200B, 747-200F, 747,300, 747-400, 747-400F, and 747SP series airplanes. This AD requires repetitive detailed and high frequency eddy current inspections ofthe forward and aft sides of the strilt front spar chord for cracks and 

### A1J,"-ll[f~ 

## ;'P INlTIAlSl

# Pft '" ,//S/"'. ROuTING SYM80l AIJ~-12QS

### fLf 

# 3~Arc;;r pu: 

# 7} /5/.010 OU""9 Symbol 

### ScI1-Ptt lNmALS/S1G 

# /.,10

Oi)llNG SYMBOL fractures at each strut location, and corrective actions ifnecessary. This AD results from 

# J7D" ' ,NmAlS/SIG reports ofcracks and fractures inthe nacelle stru~front spar chord assembly. We are

upper link load path and consequent fracture of the diagonal brace, which could result in in-Hight separation ofthe strut and engine from the airplane. ROU"fl"G S MBOl DATES: This AD is effective [INSERT DATE 15DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION INTHE FEDERAL REGISTER].

OUTING SYMBOL tmlAt5(SIG
### §973r. Authorization of appropriations

(a) There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002 such sums as may be necessary for carrying out the purposes and provisions of the Treaty and this chapter including—

(1) for fiscal years 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002, an amount not to exceed $350,000 annually to the Department of Commerce for administrative expenses; and

(2) for fiscal years 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002, an amount not to exceed $50,000 annually to the Department of State for administrative expenses.

(b) Funds appropriated for the purposes of the Treaty may be used notwithstanding any of the provisions of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq.) or of any appropriations Act that imposes restrictions on the maintenance or use of cash transfer assistance, which are inconsistent with the provisions of the Treaty.

(Pub. L. 100–330, §20, June 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 601; Pub. L. 102–523, §3(b), Oct. 26, 1992, 106 Stat. 3433.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, referred to in subsec. (b), is Pub. L. 87–195, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 424, which is classified principally to chapter 32 (§2151 et seq.) of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2151 of Title 22 and Tables.

#### Amendments

1992—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–523 substituted "1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002" for "1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, and 1992" in three places.
# Official Journal L 363/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 363 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 633 November 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 363

English edition

Legislation

Volume 633 November 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1605 of 30 October 2020 terminating the partial interim review of the anti-dumping and countervailing measures applicable to imports of certain graphite electrode systems originating in India | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1606 of 30 October 2020 concerning certain interim protective measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in the Netherlands
  (notified under document C(2020) 7633)

   (
  1
  ) | 9 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1605 of 30 October 2020 terminating the partial interim review of the anti-dumping and countervailing measures applicable to imports of certain graphite electrode systems originating in India

1

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1606 of 30 October 2020 concerning certain interim protective measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in the Netherlands
  (notified under document C(2020) 7633)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2020) 7633)

1

9

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
### SUBCHAPTER A—DEFINITIONS
<PAGE>
 
                          [LETTERHEAD OF WELLS FARGO]

                              September 15, 1997

Samuel G. Lindsay, President
Grip Technologies, Inc.
10 Corporate Park, Suite 130
Irvine, CA 92606

Dear Mr. Lindsay:
 
   This letter is to confirm that Wells Fargo Bank, National Association 
("Bank") has agreed to extend the maturity date of that certain credit 
accommodation granted by Bank to Grip Technologies, Inc. ("Borrower") in the 
maximum principal amount of Seven Hundred Eighty Thousand Dollars ($780,000.00),
as evidenced by that certain promissory note dated as of January 14, 1997, 
executed by Borrower and payable to the order of Bank (the "Note"), a copy of 
which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
                            ---------

   The maturity date of said credit accommodation is hereby extended until 
December 15, 1997. The Note shall be deemed modified as of the date this letter 
is acknowledged by Borrower to reflect said new maturity date. All other terms 
and conditions of the Note remain in full force and effect, without waiver of 
modification.

   Borrower acknowledges that Bank has not committed to make any renewal or 
further extension of the maturity date of the above-described credit 
accommodation beyond the new maturity date specified herein, and that any such 
renewal or further extension remains in the sole discretion of Bank. This 
letter constitutes the entire agreement between Bank and Borrower with respect 
to the maturity date extension for the above-described credit accommodation, and
supersedes all prior negotiations, discussions and correspondence concerning
said extension.
<PAGE>
 
Grip Technologies, Inc.
September 15, 1997
Page 2


   Please acknowledge your acceptance of the terms and conditions contained 
herein by dating and signing one copy below and returning it to my attention at 
the above address on or before September 26, 1997.


                                   Very truly yours,
                  
                                   WELLS FARGO BANK,
                                     NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

                                   By: /s/ ELLIOT E. ICHINOSE
                                      ----------------------------
                                      Elliot E. Ichinose
                                      Vice President

Acknowledged and accepted as of 9-20-97:
                                -------

GRIP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

By: /s/ SAMUEL G. LINDSAY
   -----------------------------
   Samuel G. Lindsay  
   President
BRITISH AIRWAYS

QSD Avionics Standards

Fax Cover Sheet

DATE: July 2.2002 TIME: 14:54

RECEIVED

JUl 02 2002

ANM-114

TO: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) FAX: 001425227-1232

FROM

REF:

Tony Morgan

Standards Design Engineer

ESA.224.AEM. 3323

PHONE: 01815133702

FAX: 01815133736

Numbe( of pages including cover sheet: [1 1

Docket Number 2002-NM-12-AD

Dcar Sir,

Please take into account the following comments submittec on behalf of British Airways:

1) Any AD issued should refer to a covering Boeing Alert 5B and not a component 5B,

2) The change in mod standard for the proposed mandatory requirement should be

idenlifiec by a change in part number and not by 'MOD 2' written on a post mod unil. Most

'inventory control system's only track parts by part number and SA has 10 track the

embodiment or mod programmes manually unless the part number of post mod units is

changed. This would be an inherently error prone and time consuming process and it is

also difficult to demonstrate continuing airworthiness after the embodiment programme

has been completec,

3) The implementa~on of the modification would require a considerable k>gistical exercise of

removing units from aircraft, modifying them in workshops Ulan installing them on aircraft

As any AD may be applicable to all the Boeing aircraft SA operates there would a

significant risk of operalional disruption with an 18 month embodiment period. Would the

FAA reconsider the proposed embodiment period, and ,f pOSSible, extend the compliance

period to two years.

Your Faithfully

A,E.Morgan

PO Box 10 Heathrow Airport

Hounslow Middlesex TW6 2JA Tel 0181 562

Telex 8813953 BAwYSC G CJbl~s; British3ir

TOTAL P.OI
### §543b. Acquisition of lands

#### (a) Authority of Secretary; exceptions

The Secretary is authorized to acquire all lands and interests therein within the boundary of the Scenic Area by donation, exchange in accordance with sections 543 to 543h of this title or other provisions of law, or purchase with donated or appropriated funds, except that—

(1) any lands or interests therein within the boundary of the Scenic Area which are owned by the State of California or any political subdivision thereof (including the city of Los Angeles) may be acquired only by donation or exchange; and

(2) lands or interests therein within the boundary of the Scenic Area which are not owned by the State of California or any political subdivision thereof (including the city of Los Angeles) may be acquired only with the consent of the owner thereof unless the Secretary determines, after written notice to the owner and after opportunity for comment, that the property is being developed, or proposed to be developed, in a manner which is detrimental to the integrity of the Scenic Area or which is otherwise incompatible with the purposes of sections 543 to 543h of this title.

#### (b) Guidelines; detrimental or incompatible use

(1) Not later than six months after September 28, 1984, the Secretary shall publish specific guidelines under which determinations shall be made under paragraph (2) of subsection (a). No use which existed prior to June 1, 1984, within the area included in the Scenic Area shall be treated under such guidelines as a detrimental or incompatible use within the meaning of such paragraph (2).

(2) For purposes of subsection (a)(2), any development or proposed development of private property within the boundary of the Scenic Area that is significantly different from, or a significant expansion of, development existing as of June 1, 1984, shall be considered by the Secretary as detrimental to the integrity of the Scenic Area. No reconstruction or expansion of a private or commercial building, including—

(A) reconstruction of an existing building,

(B) construction of attached structural additions, not to exceed 100 per centum of the square footage of the original building, and

(C) construction of reasonable support development such as roads, parking, water and sewage systems shall be treated as detrimental to the integrity of the Scenic Area or as an incompatible development within the meaning of paragraph (2) of subsection (a).

#### (c) Preparation of environmental assessments

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary shall only be required to prepare an environmental assessment of any exchange of mineral or geothermal interest authorized by sections 543 to 543h of this title.

(Pub. L. 98–425, title III, §303, Sept. 28, 1984, 98 Stat. 1633.)
AFS-10-221-E April 29, 2010 Exemption No. 8299C Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-8742

Mr. Gary G. Olenkiewicz U.S. Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration

2300 Horizon Drive Fort Worth, TX 76177

Dear Mr. Olenkiewicz:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8299, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated April 2, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of the U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), for an extension of Exemption No. 8299, as amended. That exemption from §§ 91.117(a), (b), and (c); 91.159(a); and 91.209(a)(1) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows the DEA to conduct air operations in support of drug law enforcement and drug traffic

interdiction.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the DEA.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8299, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 8299, as amended, to April 30, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 8299, as amended, remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 8299.

Sincerely,

/s/

John W. McGraw Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
### §831n. Bonds for future construction; amount, terms, and conditions

In the construction of any future dam, steam plant, or other facility, to be used in whole or in part for the generation or transmission of electric power the Board is authorized and empowered to issue on the credit of the United States and to sell serial bonds not exceeding $50,000,000 in amount, having a maturity not more than fifty years from the date of issue thereof, and bearing interest not exceeding 31⁄2 per centum per annum. Said bonds shall be issued and sold in amounts and prices approved by the Secretary of the Treasury, but all such bonds as may be so issued and sold shall have equal rank. None of said bonds shall be sold below par, and no fee, commission, or compensation whatever shall be paid to any person, firm, or corporation for handling, negotiating the sale, or selling the said bonds. All of such bonds so issued and sold shall have all the rights and privileges accorded by law to Panama Canal bonds, authorized by section 8 of the Act of June 28, 1902, chapter 1302, as amended by the Act of December 21, 1905 (ch. 3, sec. 1, 34 Stat. 5). All funds derived from the sale of such bonds shall be paid over to the Corporation.

(May 18, 1933, ch. 32, §15, 48 Stat. 66; Pub. L. 108–447, div. C, title VI, §603(a)(2), Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 2966.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 8 of the Act of June 28, 1902, chapter 1302, as amended by the Act of December 21, 1905 (ch. 3, sec. 1, 34 Stat. 5), referred to in text, was classified to sections 743, 744, and 744 note of former Title 31 and was repealed in part by Pub. L. 97–258, §5(b), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1068, the first section of which enacted Title 31, Money and Finance, and in part by Pub. L. 97–452, §4(b), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2480.

#### Amendments

2004—Pub. L. 108–447 substituted "Board" for "board" in first sentence.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2004 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 108–447 effective on the later of the date on which at least three persons nominated under section 604(a) of Pub. L. 108–447 take office or May 18, 2005, see section 604(b) of Pub. L. 108–447, set out in an Appointments; Effective Date; Transition note under section 831a of this title.