alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 4,732

 4,111

 3,663

 3,679

 4,590

 6,429

 7,439

 7,461

 7,196

 8,158

 7,102

 7,080

 6,470

 6,231

 6,718

 5,538

 6,187

 8,525

 11,007

 11,472

 11,870

 12,306

 12,219

 10,432

 9,753

 9,338

 9,557

 10,227

 9,866

 9,683

 9,620

 813

 808

 691

 828

 456

 477

 661

 1,073

 480

 404

 396

 547

 616

 766

 1,314

 1,529

 1,354

 1,693

 1,775

 2,159

 2,156

 2,224

 2,760

 2,678

 3,223

 2,173

 2,811

 2,956

 3,351

 3,319

 2,792

 2,643

 2,535

 2,366

 2,164

 2,094

 2,611

 3,250

 3,676

 3,285

 3,426

 3,295

 3,187

 3,074

 3,249

 3,730

 3,567

 3,490

 4,801

 5,178

 6,112

 6,412

 7,150

 7,484

 6,774

 6,688

 5,913

 6,384

 6,596

 6,374

 6,071

 5,786

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 2, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Odell Wilkens, Also Known as Odell Wilkins, Appellant.

[823 *1372NYS2d 751]

Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied. Present—Hurlbutt, A.PJ., Gorski, Martoche and Smith, JJ.
s County

BlacksaWSA

M

NO

AN

A

T

DI

O 

H

A

g:\blm\buttermp\AMS\FinalFigures\fig2-23_roadandtransportation.mxd 

Gallatin County 

Three Forks 

Sweet Gras 

Park County 

Belgrade 

Yellowstone River Island WSA 

Bozeman 

Livingston 

90 § ̈¦

Big Sky 

Gardiner 

Yellowstone National Park 

West Yellowstone 

£¤287 

I
 

ge 

Wilderness Study Area (WSA) - Closed to Travel 

Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Land - Area Availability for Motorized Travel 

0 Miles 10 Open to Limited Travel Butte Field Office - EIS

Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Land - Open to Travel RMP Planning Area, Montana Map

Location FIGURE 2-23c No warranty is made by the Bureau of

Land Management (BLM) for use of

data for purposes not tended by BLM. in
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 2,137

 4,197

 3,814

 2,883

 2,679

 2,752

 2,766

 3,060

 3,551

 3,200

 3,173

 4,286

 4,738

 5,414

 5,221

 4,611

 4,865

 4,579

 3,970

 3,806

 5,367

 6,448

 6,546

 6,352

 7,848

 8,921

 8,678

 9,142

 7,906

 6,574

 5,875

 201

 182

 296

 272

 263

 383

 319

 314

 295

 268

 229

 237

 274

 325

 344

 338

 22

 619

 621

 629

 832

 936

 1,127

 682

 577

 828

 921

 1,333

 1,554

 1,283

 1,109

 1,026

 1,666

 1,801

 1,624

 1,236

 1,192

 1,192

 1,260

 1,387

 1,356

 1,379

 1,567

 1,950

 2,146

 2,152

 2,159

 2,318

 2,517

 2,244

 2,055

 2,174

 2,774

 3,226

 2,829

 3,175

 3,828

 4,183

 4,673

 4,452

 3,878

 3,408

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 5, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
EXHIBIT 10.32****

 

SunGard Data Systems Inc. 

Summary Description of the Company’s 

Annual Executive Incentive Compensation Program 

 

 

SunGard DataSystems Inc. has an annual executive incentive compensation (“EIC”) program for its executive officers and other key management employees. The principal purpose of this program is to link a significant portion of annual cash compensationto financial results and other goals, so as to reward successful performance. 

 

Each participant’s EIC program contains certain financial and/or business goals as targets. These targets are established at the beginning of each year and take into account the Company’s overall financial and business goals forthe year. The performance goals for executive officers are based primarily upon either targeted rates of increase in the Company’s earnings per share over the previous year or budgeted operating income of the business units that report to theofficer. Sometimes, there are additional performance goals specific to the officer’s function. For other key management employees, the targets are based upon financial and/or business goals related to the business units they manage and,sometimes, additional performance goals specific to their individual functions. 

 

Generally, the EIC programs contain an incentive compensation amount related to each target. If the target is achieved, then the related incentive compensation amount is earned. For most financial goals, there are three to four designatedtargets. If the actual result is less than the minimum target, then no incentive amount is earned. If the actual result is between two targets, then the incentive amount earned is calculated by interpolation. If the actual result is more than themaximum target, then the incentive amount earned is equal to the amount related to the maximum target plus, in some cases, an additional incentive amount based upon the extent to which the maximum target was exceeded.
### §760aa–3. Community partnership enhancement

#### (a) Projects and programs

Subject to the requirements of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.) and other applicable law, and such terms and conditions as the Secretary of the Interior determines to be appropriate, the Secretary may approve projects and programs for a facility of the System that—

(1) promote the stewardship of resources of the hatchery through habitat maintenance, restoration, and improvement, biological monitoring, or research;

(2) support the operation and maintenance of the hatchery through constructing, operating, maintaining, or improving the facilities and services of the hatchery;

(3) increase the awareness and understanding of the hatchery and the System, through the development, publication, or distribution of educational materials and products;

(4) advance education concerning the purposes of the hatchery and the mission of the System, through the use of the hatchery as an outdoor classroom and development of other educational programs; or

(5) contribute financial resources to the hatchery, under the terms that require that the net revenues be used exclusively for the benefit of the hatchery, through donation of net revenues from the sale of educational materials and products and through encouragement of gifts, devises, and bequests.

#### (b) Treasury account

Amounts received by the Secretary of the Interior as a result of projects and programs under subsection (a) shall be deposited in a separate account in the Treasury. Amounts in the account that are attributable to activities at a particular facility of the System shall be available to the Secretary of the Interior, without further appropriation, to pay the costs of incidental expenses related to volunteer activities, and to carry out cooperative agreements for the hatchery facility.

(Pub. L. 109–360, §5, Oct. 16, 2006, 120 Stat. 2060.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is act Mar. 10, 1934, ch. 55, 48 Stat. 401, which is classified generally to sections 661 to 666c–1 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 661(a) of this title, Short Title note set out under section 661 of this title, and Tables.
§ 21.50 Standards for awards. ( a ) In determining the reasonableness of the amount sought as an award of fees and expenses for an attorney, agent, or expert witness, the adjudicative officer shall consider one or more of the following: ( 1 ) ( i ) If the attorney, agent, or expert witness is in private practice, his or her customary fee for similar services; or
( ii ) If the attorney, agent, or expert witness is an employee of the applicant, the fully allocated cost of the services.
( 2 ) The prevailing rate for similar services in the community in which the attorney, agent, or expert witness ordinarily performs services.
( 3 ) The time the attorney, agent, or expert witness actually spent on the applicant's behalf with respect to the adversary adjudication.
( 4 ) The time the attorney, agent, or expert witness reasonably spent in light of the difficulty or complexity of the covered issues in the adversary adjudication.
( 5 ) Any other factors that may bear on the value of the services provided by the attorney, agent, or expert witness.
( b ) The adjudicative officer may not grant— ( 1 ) An award for the fee of an attorney or agent in excess of $75.00 per hour; or
( 2 ) An award to compensate an expert witness in excess of the highest rate at which the Department pays expert witnesses.
( c ) The adjudicative officer may also determine whether— ( 1 ) Any study, analysis, engineering report, text, or project for which the applicant seeks an award was necessary for the preparation of the applicant's case in the adversary adjudication; and
( 2 ) The costs claimed by the applicant for this item or items are reasonable.
( d ) The adjudicative officer may not make an award to an eligible party if the adjudicative officer, the CRRA, or the Secretary on review finds that, based on a review of the administrative record as a whole— ( 1 ) The position of the Department, as defined in § 21.3, was substantially justified; or
( 2 ) Special circumstances make an award unjust.
( e ) The adjudicative officer may reduce or deny an award to the extent that the applicant engaged in conduct that unduly or unreasonably protracted the adversary adjudication.
( f ) If an applicant is entitled to an award because the applicant prevailed over another agency of the United States that participated in a proceeding before the Department and that agency's position was not substantially justified, the adjudicative officer shall determine whether to make the award, or an appropriate portion of the award, against that agency. For the purpose of this determination, the requirements of this subpart apply.
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 504(a), (b)(1)(A), and (b)(1)(E))
### §1852. Timber removed or transported

Whoever cuts, or wantonly destroys any timber growing on the public lands of the United States; or

Whoever removes any timber from said public lands, with intent to export or to dispose of the same; or

Whoever, being the owner, master, pilot, operator, or consignee of any vessel, motor vehicle, or aircraft or the owner, director, or agent of any railroad, knowingly transports any timber so cut or removed from said lands, or lumber manufactured therefrom—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

This section shall not prevent any miner or agriculturist from clearing his land in the ordinary working of his mining claim, or in the preparation of his farm for tillage, or from taking the timber necessary to support his improvements, or the taking of timber for the use of the United States; nor shall it interfere with or take away any right or privilege under any existing law of the United States to cut or remove timber from any public lands.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 787; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §601(a)(8), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3498.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §103 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §49, 35 Stat. 1098).

Reference to persons causing or procuring was omitted as unnecessary in view of definition of "principal" in section 2 of this title.

Words "motor vehicle or aircraft" were inserted in third paragraph to remove any doubt as to scope of section in view of rapidly advancing methods of transportation.

Minor changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–294 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $1,000" in fourth par.
#### § 300.38 Secretary.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of Education.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1401(28))
### §2328. Mandatory forfeiture

(a) In General.—The court, in imposing sentence on a person who is convicted of any offense for which an enhanced penalty is provided under section 2326, shall order that the defendant forfeit to the United States—

(1) any property, real or personal, constituting or traceable to gross proceeds obtained from such offense; and

(2) any equipment, software, or other technology used or intended to be used to commit or to facilitate the commission of such offense.

(b) Procedures.—The procedures set forth in section 413 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 853), other than subsection (d) of that section, and in Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, shall apply to all stages of a criminal forfeiture proceeding under this section.

(Added Pub. L. 115–70, title IV, §402(a)(4), Oct. 18, 2017, 131 Stat. 1214.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, referred to in subsec. (b), are set out in the Appendix to this title.
### §482g. Perfection of claims within forest

Valid mining claims within the watershed of the headwaters of the Bonito River in the Lincoln National Forest, within the State of New Mexico, as above described, existing on June 13, 1939, and thereafter maintained in compliance with the law under which they were initiated and the laws of the State of New Mexico, may be perfected under sections 482e and 482f of this title, or under the laws under which they were initiated, as the claimant may desire.

(June 13, 1939, ch. 201, §3, 53 Stat. 818.)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7485

ROGER KELLEY, Plaintiff – Appellant,

v. LARRY POWERS, Director, Spartanburg County Detention Center; TERESA SPELLER, Head of Security at Spartanburg County Detention Center, Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (9:07-cv-03655-GRA)

Submitted: January 7, 2009 Decided: January 20, 2009

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger Kelley, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Todd Darwin, HOLCOMBE, BOMAR, GUNN & BRADFORD, PA, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Roger Kelley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2006). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Kelley that failure to file timely, specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Kelley failed to file specific objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation; he only restated the claims raised in his complaint. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that the failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Kelley has waived appellate review by failing to file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

23 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
### §2193. Revolt or mutiny of seamen

Whoever, being of the crew of a vessel of the United States, on the high seas, or on any other waters within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States, unlawfully and with force, or by fraud, or intimidation, usurps the command of such vessel from the master or other lawful officer in command thereof, or deprives him of authority and command on board, or resists or prevents him in the free and lawful exercise thereof, or transfers such authority and command to another not lawfully entitled thereto, is guilty of a revolt and mutiny, and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 800; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(I), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §484 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §293, 35 Stat. 1146).

Punishment provision for mandatory fine and imprisonment was rephrased in the alternative so as to vest power in the court to impose either a fine, or imprisonment, or both, in its discretion.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $2,000".
# C_2017399EN.01000101.xml

| 24.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2015-2016 SESSION

Sitting of 2 December 2015

The Minutes of this session have been published in

  OJ C 458, 8.12.2016
  .

The Minutes of this session have been published in

OJ C 458, 8.12.2016

TEXTS ADOPTED

Sittings of 14 to 17 December 2015

The Minutes of this session have been published in

  OJ C 469, 15.12.2016
  .

The Minutes of this session have been published in

OJ C 469, 15.12.2016

The text adopted of 17 December 2015 on a Commitee of Inquiry into emission measurements in the automotive sector has been published in

  OJ L 10, 15.1.2016
  .

The text adopted of 17 December 2015 on a Commitee of Inquiry into emission measurements in the automotive sector has been published in

OJ L 10, 15.1.2016

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, James D. Bowden, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Excelsior Venture Partners III, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 15, 2008                              
|                                                      
|/s/    James D. Bowden                                
|James D. Bowden, President and Chief Executive
Officer
### **CHAPTER 213—LIMITATIONS**

Sec.
3281.
Capital offenses.
3282.
Offenses not capital.
3283.
Child abuse offenses. 1

3284.
Concealment of bankrupt's assets.
3285.
Criminal contempt.
3286.
Extension of statute of limitation for certain terrorism offenses.
3287.
Wartime suspension of limitations.
3288.
Indictments and information dismissed after period of limitations.
3289.
Indictments and information dismissed before period of limitations.
3290.
Fugitives from justice.
3291.
Nationality, citizenship and passports.
3292.
Suspension of limitations to permit United States to obtain foreign evidence.
3293.
Financial institution offenses.
3294.
Theft of major artwork.
3295.
Arson offenses.
3296.
Counts dismissed pursuant to a plea agreement.
3297.
Cases involving DNA evidence.
3298.
Trafficking-related offenses  2

3299.
Child abduction and sex offenses  2
3300.
Recruitment or use of child soldiers.
3301.
Securities fraud offenses.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2010**—Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1079A(b)(2), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2079, added item 3301.

**2008**—Pub. L. 110–340, §2(a)(3)(B), Oct. 3, 2008, 122 Stat. 3736, added item 3300.

**2006**—Pub. L. 109–248, title II, §211(2), July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 616, added item 3299.

Pub. L. 109–162, title XI, §1182(b), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3126, added item 3298.

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–405, title II, §204(b), Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2271, added item 3297.

**2002**—Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title III, §3003(b), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1805, added item 3296.

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–132, title VII, §708(c)(2), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1297, added item 3295.

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–322, title XII, §120001(c), title XXXII, §320902(d)(2), title XXXIII, §330018(c), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2021, 2124, 2149, substituted "Child abuse offenses" for "Customs and slave trade violations" in item 3283 and added items 3286 and 3294.

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–647, title XII, §1207(b), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4832, struck out item 3286 "Seduction on vessel of United States".

**1989**—Pub. L. 101–73, title IX, §961(l)(2), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 501, added item 3293.

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7081(c), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4407, substituted "Indictments and information dismissed after period of limitations" for "Reindictment where defect found after period of limitations" in item 3288 and "Indictments and information dismissed before period of limitations" for "Reindictment where defect found before period of limitations" in item 3289.

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §1218(b), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2167, added item 3292.

**1951**—Act June 30, 1951, ch. 194, §2, 65 Stat. 107, added item 3291.

1  Section catchline amended by Pub. L. 108–21 without corresponding amendment of chapter analysis.

2  So in original. Probably should be followed by a period.