alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit10.2





Exhibit 10.2

 

     Since inception, I have loaned Anvil Forest Products $14,158 for operations on a no-interest basis. These funds were used by the Company for incorporation, administrative and legal fees and office expenses relating to the Registration Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The loans are due on demand.

 

 

	
WALTER BRENNER 

Walter Brenner

	                                                                	
October 25, 2007 

Date
Order entered June 28, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 20

- 01007

- CR

QUINTUS JEROME RICHARDSON , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 1 95 th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 19

- 13785

- N

O RDER

In light of the Court ’ s June 24, 2021 opinion , we will take no action on a ny

pending motions, including appointed counsel Valencia Bush ’ s motion to

withdraw or appe lla nt ’ s motion for an extension of time to file his pro se response.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
### §10. Interstate commerce and foreign commerce defined

The term "interstate commerce", as used in this title, includes commerce between one State, Territory, Possession, or the District of Columbia and another State, Territory, Possession, or the District of Columbia.

The term "foreign commerce", as used in this title, includes commerce with a foreign country.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 686.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§408, 408b, 414(a), and 419a(b) (Oct. 29, 1919, ch. 89, §2(b), 41 Stat. 325; June 22, 1932, ch. 271, §2, 47 Stat. 326; May 18, 1934, ch. 301, 48 Stat. 782; May 22, 1934, ch. 333, §2(a), 48 Stat. 794; Aug. 18, 1941, ch. 366, §2(b), 55 Stat. 631).

This section consolidates into one section identical definitions contained in sections 408, 408b, 414(a), and 419a(b) of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed.

In addition to slight improvements in style, the word "commerce" was substituted for "transportation" in order to avoid the narrower connotation of the word "transportation" since "commerce" obviously includes more than "transportation." The word "Possession" was inserted in two places to make the definition more accurate and comprehensive since the places included in the word "Possession" would normally be within the term defined and a narrower construction should be handled by express statutory exclusion in those crimes which Congress intends to restrict to commerce within the continental United States.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 62 (Thursday, March 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17995-17996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7510]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self 
Employed Correspondence Exam Practitioner Engagement Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/
Self Employed Correspondence Exam Practitioner Engagement Project 
Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting 
public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving

[[Page 17996]]

customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Monday, May 23, 2011 and Tuesday, May 
24, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 
206-220-6098.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self 
Employed Correspondence Exam Practitioner Engagement Project Committee 
will be held Monday, May 23, 2011 from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and Tuesday, 
May 24, 2011 from 8 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. Mountain Time in Denver, CO. The 
public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements 
for consideration. Notifications of intent to participate must be made 
with Ms. Janice Spinks. For more information and site location please 
contact Ms. Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098, or write TAP 
Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174, or post comments 
to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: March 24, 2011.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2011-7510 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
§ 303.223 Control of funds and property. The State must ensure that— ( a ) The control of funds provided under this part, and title to property acquired with those funds, will be in a public agency for the uses and purposes provided in this part; and
( b ) A public agency will administer the funds and property.
(Approved by Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0550) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1437(b)(3))
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 7076

WEBSTER R. NEUMANN , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. MR. WEDELLE, Superintendent; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA , Respondents

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. Catherine C. Eagles , District Judge. ( 1:21

- cv - 00892

- CCE

- JEP )

Submitted : April 25, 2023 Decided: April 28, 2023

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER , Circuit Judge , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Webster R. Neumann , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7076 Doc: 10 Filed: 04/28/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Webster R. Neumann, a Nor th Carolina prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely
Neumann’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. See Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 148 & n.9 (2012) (explaining that § 2254 petition s are subject to one

- year statute of limitations, running from latest of four commencement dates enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When , as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner mus t demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez , 565
U.S. at 140

- 41 (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Neumann has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-7076 Doc: 10 Filed: 04/28/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
# Official Journal C 318/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 318 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5112 December 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 318

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5112 December 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2008/C 318/01 | Report by the external auditor on the Court of Auditors' accounts for the financial year 2007 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Court of Auditors

2008/C 318/01

Report by the external auditor on the Court of Auditors' accounts for the financial year 2007

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2008/C 318/02 | Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover) | s3 |

2008/C 318/02

Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover)

Note to the reader

s3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**Exhibit(32.2)** **Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**     For the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Paul A. Smith, the chief financial officer of ImperialOil Limited (the “company”), hereby certifies that to his knowledge:(i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the company for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the company.Date: February 26, 2008   /s/ Paul A. Smith Paul A. Smith  Senior Vice-President,  Finance and Administration, and Treasurer  (Chief Financial Officer)
#### Harry Weinstein v. Mid-Eastern Corporation.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
§ 270.31 What stipends and related reimbursements are authorized under this program? ( a ) The recipient of an award under this program may pay: ( 1 ) Stipends to public school personnel who participate in technical assistance or training activities funded under this part for the period of their attendance, if the person to whom the stipend is paid receives no other compensation for that period; or
( 2 ) Reimbursement to a responsible governmental agency that pays substitutes for public school personnel who: ( i ) Participate in technical assistance or training activities funded under this part; and
( ii ) Are being compensated by that responsible governmental agency for the period of their attendance.
( b ) A recipient may pay the stipends and reimbursements described in this section only if it demonstrates that the payment of these costs is necessary to the success of the technical assistance or training activity, and will not exceed 20 percent of the total award.
( c ) If a recipient is authorized by the Secretary to pay stipends or reimbursements (or any combination of these payments), the recipient shall determine the conditions and rates for these payments in accordance with appropriate State policies, or in the absence of State policies, in accordance with local policies.
( d ) A recipient of a grant under this part may pay a travel allowance only to a person who participates in a technical assistance or training activity under this part.
( e ) If the participant does not complete the entire scheduled activity, the recipient may pay the participant's transportation to his or her residence or place of employment only if the participant left the training activity because of circumstances not reasonably within his or her control.
### §1586. Service on vessels in slave trade

Whoever, being a citizen or resident of the United States, voluntarily serves on board of any vessel employed or made use of in the transportation of slaves from any foreign country or place to another, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 773; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(I), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §427 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §252, 35 Stat. 1139).

Mandatory-punishment provisions were rephrased in the alternative.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $2,000".
#### § 636.203 What are the elements of two-phase selection procedures for competitive proposals?

The first phase consists of short listing based on a RFQ. The second phase consists of the receipt and evaluation of price and technical proposals in response to a RFP.
430 P.2d 102

#### Lupe P. RIVERA, Individually and as City Clerk of the City of Lordsburg, New Mexico, and Alan A. Koff, Individually and as Mayor of the City of Lordsburg, New Mexico, Plaintiffs-in-Error, v. C. V. NUNN, Jr., Warren D. White, Virgil Craddock, Guadalupe Q. Varela and Gildardo R. Renteria, Defendants-in-Error.

No. 8147.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

July 17, 1967.

Standley, Kegel & Campos, Frank P. Dickson, Jr., Santa Fe, for plaintiffs in error.

OPINION

NOBLE, Justice.

Alan A. Koff and Lupe P. Rivera, as the Mayor and City Clerk of Lordsburg, New Mexico, have sxxed out a writ of error seeking review of an ex parte peremptory writ of maxidamus reqxxiring them to issue warrants payable to C. V. Nunn, Jr., Warren D. White, Virgil Craddock, Guadalupe Q. Varela and Gildardo R. Renteria, by reason of their claimed employment by the city for the months of March and April, 1966.

The petition before the district court alleged that petitioners were employees of the City of Lordsburg, and that they had performed the duties required of them, but had not been paid the compensation due them for their employment during the months of March and April, 1966, in the amounts reflected upon the records of the city clerk.

Section 22-12-7, N.M.S.A.1953, reads:

> “When the right to require the performance of the act is clear-, and it is apparent that no valid excuse can be given for not perfox-ming it, a peremptory mandamus may be allowed in the first instance; in all other cases the alternative writ shall be first issxxed.”

Under this statute, a peremptory writ of mandamus issued in an ex parte proceeding must contain allegations of all facts necessary to show that the right to require performance of the act sought is clear and that no valid excuse can be given for not performing it. Mora County Board of Education v. Valdez, 61 N.M. 361, 300 P.2d 943; Territory v. Board of County Comm’rs, 5 N.M. 1, 16 P. 855.

The allegations of the petition in this case are not of facts or circumstances from which it can be ascertained, as a matter of law, that no valid excuse can be given for not performing the acts sought to be compelled. Issues of fact as to whether petitioners were, in fact, city employees, whether they had performed services, and the amount of pay, if any, to which they *209were entitled, are all questions which could form the basis of a legal defense to the issuance of a writ of mandamus.

It follows that the issuance of an ex parte peremptory writ, under the circumstances here present, was erroneous requiring that the case be reversed and remanded with directions to vacate the peremptory writ of mandamus heretofore issued, and to proceed further in a manner not inconsistent with the views expressed herein.

It is so ordered.

CARMODY, J., and RICHARD A. STANLEY, District Judge, concur.
### §4915. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary $5,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 1993, 1994, and 1995 to carry out this chapter, to remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 102–440, title I, §116, Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2233.)
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4949 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish qualifications for 

the human resources positions within the Veterans Health Administration 

of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 31, 2019 

Mr. BOST (for himself, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mrs. WALORSKI, Mr. RUTHERFORD, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. CALVERT, and Ms. STEFANIK) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish qualifications for the human resources positions within the 

Veterans Health Administration of the Department of 

Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘VA Hospitals Estab5 lishing Leadership Performance Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4949 IH

1 SEC. 2. QUALIFICATIONS FOR HUMAN RESOURCES POSI2 TIONS WITHIN THE VETERANS HEALTH AD3 MINISTRATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF 

4 VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

5 (a) ESTABLISHMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS.—Not 

6 later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of 

7 this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall— 

8 (1) establish qualifications for each human re9 sources position within the Veterans Health Admin10 istration of the Department of Veterans Affairs; 

11 (2) establish standardized performance metrics 

12 for each such position; and 

13 (3) submit to Congress a report containing the 

14 qualifications and standardized performance metrics 

15 established under paragraphs (1) and (2). 

16 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the es17 tablishment of the qualifications and performance metrics 

18 under subsection (a), the Comptroller General of the 

19 United States shall submit to the Committee on Veterans’ 

20 Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Com21 mittee on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate a report con22 taining— 

23 (1) a description of the implementation of such 

24 qualifications and performance metrics; and 

25 (2) an assessment of the quality of such quali26 fications and performance metrics. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4949 IH

1 SEC. 3. NO ADDITIONAL FUNDS AUTHORIZED. 

2 No additional funds are authorized to be appro3 priated to carry out the requirements of this Act. Such 

4 requirements shall be carried out using amounts otherwise 

5 authorized to be appropriated. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
§ 303.228 Subsequent State application and modifications of application. ( a ) *Subsequent State application.* If a State has on file with the Secretary a policy, procedure, method, or assurance that demonstrates that the State meets an application requirement in this part, including any policy, procedure, method, or assurance filed under this part (as in effect before the date of enactment of the Act, December 3, 2004), the Secretary considers the State to have met that requirement for purposes of receiving a grant under this part.
( b ) *Modification of application.* An application submitted by a State that meets the requirements of this part remains in effect until the State submits to the Secretary such modifications as the State determines necessary. This section applies to a modification of an application to the same extent and in the same manner as this paragraph applies to the original application.
( c ) *Modifications required by the Secretary.* The Secretary may require a State to modify its application under this part to the extent necessary to ensure the State's compliance with this part if— ( 1 ) An amendment is made to the Act or to a Federal regulation issued under the Act;
( 2 ) A new interpretation of the Act is made by a Federal court or the State's highest court; or
( 3 ) An official finding of noncompliance with Federal law or regulations is made with respect to the State.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1437(d)-(f))
**Exhibit 31(a)**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Jan B. Packwood,President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of IDACORP, Inc.;

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant'sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)     Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date   | March 4, 2004                          | By: | /s/ | *Jan B. Packwood* |
|--------|----------------------------------------|-----|-----|-------------------|
|   | Jan B. Packwood                        |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 6 (Monday, January 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1459-1460]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-76]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993-ASTM International

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 6, 2010, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), ASTM International 
(``ASTM'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions 
or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.

[[Page 1460]]

Specifically, ASTM has provided an updated list of current, ongoing 
ASTM standards activities originating between September 2010 and 
December 2010 designated as Work Items. A complete listing of ASTM Work 
Items, along with a brief description of each, is available at http://www.astm.org.
    On September 15, 2004, ASTM filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on November 10, 2004 (69 FR 65226).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 
23, 2010. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on October 26, 2010 (75 FR 65657).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2011-76 Filed 1-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M