alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSELITA MAZARIEGOS REYES, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 15-72732 

Agency No. A205-914-319 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 9, 2020**

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, TASHIMA, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Joselita Mazariegos Reyes, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying her applications for asylum, withholding of 

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have 

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 13 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-72732 

agency’s factual findings. Garcia-Milian v. Holder, 755 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th Cir. 

2014). We deny the petition for review.

Mazariegos Reyes does not challenge the agency’s determination that she 

failed to establish eligibility for CAT relief. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 

1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a 

party’s opening brief are waived). Thus, we deny the petition for review as to 

Mazariegos Reyes’ CAT claim. 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Mazariegos 

Reyes failed to demonstrate a nexus between the harm she experienced or fears in 

Guatemala and a protected ground. See Madrigal v. Holder, 716 F.3d 499, 506 

(9th Cir. 2013) (holding that “mistreatment motivated purely by personal 

retribution will not give rise to a valid asylum claim”); Ayala v. Holder, 640 F.3d 

1095, 1097 (9th Cir. 2011) (even if membership in a particular social group is 

established, an applicant must still show that “persecution was or will be on 

account of [her] membership in such group”). Thus, Mazariegos Reyes’ asylum 

and withholding of removal claims fail. 

The record does not support Mazariegos Reyes’ contentions that the agency 

failed to consider evidence or otherwise erred in its analysis of her claims. See 

Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 2010) (agency need not write an 

exegesis on every contention).
3 15-72732 

As stated in the court’s November 24, 2015 order, the temporary stay of 

removal remains in place until issuance of the mandate. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications.
Title:  Transportation air quality analysis  : sketch planning methods
Volume 1  |   Volume  2
SuDocs No. EP 1.8:T 68/3/V.1-2| Item No. 0431-K | System No. 001003190
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

 
 
 
Last updated:  September 24,  2016  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov/
  |
|--|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### Physical properties and mineralogy of selected samples of the sediments from the vicinity of the Brookhaven National Laboratory, Long Island, New York

By: George Tobias Faust

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1156B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Ex12c
                                  IDACORP, Inc.
                       Consolidated Financial Information
Supplemental Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends Requirements



                                            Twelve Months Ended December 31,
                                                 (Thousands of Dollars)
                                          1996         1997         1998        1999        2000

<S>                                  <C>         <C>          <C>           <C>         <C>
Earnings, as defined:
  Income before  income taxes        $  135,247   $  133,570    $ 133,806   $ 137,021   $ 210,701
  Adjust for distributed income of
  equity investees                       (1,413)      (3,943)      (4,697)       (837)     (3,116)
  Equity in loss of equity method
  investments                                 0            0          458         435         186
  Minority interest in losses of
  majority owned subsidiaries                 0            0         (125)        (37)     (1,468)
  Supplemental fixed charges and
  preferred dividends, as below          73,018       72,208       72,496      74,800      75,804

     Total earnings, as defined      $  206,852   $  201,835    $ 201,938   $ 211,382   $ 282,107

Fixed charges, as defined:
  Interest charges                   $   57,348   $   60,761    $  60,677   $  62,975   $  63,339
  Preferred stock dividends of
  subsidiaries-gross up-IDACORP
  rate                                   12,079        7,891        8,445       8,313       8,886
  Rental interest factor                    991          982          801         955       1,036
     Total fixed charges                 70,418       69,634       69,923      72,243      73,261
  Supplemental increment to fixed
    charges*                              2,600        2,574        2,573       2,557       2,543


  Supplemental fixed charges             73,018       72,208       72,496      74,800      75,804
  Preferred dividends requirements            0            0            0           0           0

     Total combined supplemental
     fixed charges and preferred
     dividends                       $   73,018   $   72,208    $  72,496   $  74,800   $  75,804

Supplemental ratio of earnings to
combined fixed charges and
preferred dividends                       2.83x        2.80x        2.79x       2.83x       3.72x

*Explanation of increment - Interest on the guaranty of American Falls
       Reservoir District bonds and Milner Dam, Inc. notes which are
       already included in operation expenses.



</TABLE>
### §1117. Conspiracy to murder

If two or more persons conspire to violate section 1111, 1114, 1116, or 1119 of this title, and one or more of such persons do any overt act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be punished by imprisonment for any term of years or for life.

(Added Pub. L. 92–539, title I, §101, Oct. 24, 1972, 86 Stat. 1071; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, §60009(b)(1), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1972.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "1116, or 1119" for "or 1116".
§ 110.10 Rules against age discrimination. The rules stated in this section are subject to the exceptions contained in §§ 110.12 and 110.13 of these regulations. ( a ) *General rule.* No person in the United States shall, on the basis of age, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
( b ) *Specific rules.* A recipient may not, in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance, directly or through contractual, licensing, or other arrangements, use age distinctions or take any other actions that have the effect, on the basis of age, of— ( 1 ) Excluding individuals from, denying them the benefits of, or subjecting them to discrimination under a program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance; or
( 2 ) Denying or limiting individuals in their opportunity to participate in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
( c ) *Other forms of discrimination.* The specific forms of age discrimination listed in paragraph (b) of this section do not necessarily constitute a complete list.
(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6101-6103)
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4425 — Merril Lynch/Irish Life & Permanent)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/C 301/11)

On 30 November 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
United States Bankruptcy Court

Eastern District of Virginia

In re Alice Thomas Case No. 18-12376

Debtor(s) Chapter 13

DEBTOR’S MOTION TO EXTEND AUTOMATIC STAY

The debtor, Alice Thomas ("Debtor"), through her attorney, Edward Gonzalez VA Bar #39882, requests that the

Court extend the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) as to all creditors pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §362(c)(3)(B). In

support of his request, Debtor states as follows:

1. Debtor filed a petition under Chapter 13 on July 8, 2018.

2. Debtor previously filed a Chapter 13 case on December 11, 2017, and the case was assigned case number

17-14198-KHK. The case was dismissed on 01/10/2018, because Debtor, who filed her case pro se, did not timely file the

balance of her schedules and plan.

3. The petition in this case has been filed in good faith as to all creditors. Debtor believes that the Chapter 13 plan he

has submitted will be confirmed and that she will be able to fully perform under the terms of the plan.

4. Since the filing of the last petition Debtor has taken steps to assure success in the prosecution of this case. She

has hired counsel to assist her in moving the case forward and obtain confirmation of a plan. Furthermore, the Debtor,

who was formally self-employed and struggling in her new business making income that varied from between $4,247.00

and $6,000 per month, has since found permanent employment as a psychologist with a major medical provider making

gross income of $5,667 per month. With benefits such as health insurance, puts her on firmer financial footing. Finally,

given that the property has a minimum of $50,000 in equity, the Debtor is in a position to propose a liquidation Chapter

13 if reorganization is not possible. The mortgage lender is protected.

4. There was one motion for relief from the automatic stay, but no objections to confirmation, or other pleadings

filed against Debtor by any of his creditors in the previous case. Debtor did not voluntarily dismiss her case as a response

to the motion for relief from stay.

WHEREFORE, Debtor requests that this Court continue the automatic stay under §362(a) as to all creditors for

the duration of this Chapter 13 proceeding, or until such time as the stay is terminated under §362(c)(1) or (c)(2), or a

motion for relief is granted under § 362(d).

Dated: July 11, 2018 Respectfully submitted,

Edward Gonzalez, Counsel for Debtor

By: /s/ Edward Gonzalez VA Bar

Edward Gonzalez VA Bar #39882

2405 I Street, NW, Suite 1-A

Washington, DC 20037

Attorney for Debtor(s)

 Software Copyright (c) 1996-2018 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 18-12376-KHK Doc 6 Filed 07/11/18 Entered 07/11/18 20:03:28 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Mary L. Fisher, Defendant. Le Roy Crawford, Intervening as Party Defendant, Respondent.

Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals granted and question for review certified.
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of IDACORP, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, (the"Report"), I, Darrel T. Anderson, Senior Vice President -Administrative Services and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifythat:

 

(1)              The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| */s/Darrel T. Anderson*                         |
|-------------------------------------------------|
| Darrel T. Anderson                              |
| Senior Vice President - Administrative Services |
| and Chief Financial Officer                     |
| February 26, 2009                               |
### §460x–3. Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore Advisory Commission

#### (a) Establishment; termination

There is hereby established a Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore Advisory Commission. The Commission shall cease to exist twenty years after the establishment of the lakeshore pursuant to section 460x–1 of this title.

#### (b) Membership; appointment; term of office; recommendation or designation of appointees

The Commission shall be composed of ten members, each appointed for a term of two years by the Secretary, as follows:

(1) Four members to be appointed from recommendations made by the counties in which the lakeshore is situated, two members to represent each such county;

(2) Four members to be appointed from recommendations made by the Governor of the State of Michigan; and

(3) Two members to be designated by the Secretary.

#### (c) Chairman; vacancies

The Secretary shall designate one member to be Chairman. Any vacancy in the Commission shall be filled in the same manner in which the original appointment was made.

#### (d) Compensation and expenses; vouchers

A member of the Commission shall serve without compensation as such. The Secretary is authorized to pay the expenses reasonably incurred by the Commission in carrying out its responsibilities under this subchapter on vouchers signed by the Chairman.

#### (e) Consultation of Secretary with Commission

The Secretary or his designee shall consult with the Commission with respect to—

(1) matters relating to the development of the lakeshore and with respect to the provisions of sections 460x–8, 460x–11, and 460x–12 of this title; and

(2) matters relating to the implementation of the General Management Plan provided for in section 460x–5(b) of this title.

(Pub. L. 91–479, §4, Oct. 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 1076; Pub. L. 100–558, Oct. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 2796.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–558, §1(1), substituted "twenty" for "ten".

Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 100–558, §1(2), amended subsec. (e) generally, designating existing provisions as par. (1) and adding par. (2).
#### In the Matter of Mae Hallewell, as Executrix of Frank A. Vaupel, Deceased, Respondent. Richard J. Mackey et al., Copartners Practicing Law under the Name of Mackey & Herrlich, Appellants.

*Per Curiam.*

The fixation of the amount for services was made at a time after the rendition of the services, when the relation of attorney and client had existed for a long period of time and was still in force. In this State it has been held that as to the contracts made under such circumstances, which are beneficial to the attorney, it is incumbent upon the latter to show that the provisions are fair and reasonable and were known and understood by the client. *(Matter of Howell,*215 N. Y. 466, 472.) At least no undue advantage can be taken of the relationship. *(Rodkinson*v. *Haecker,*248 N. Y. 480.)

Without intending to indicate approval of all of the statements of the Surrogate concerning the conduct of the respondents, we affirm the decree appealed from, with costs, for the reason that we find that jurisdiction existed under section 231-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act *(Matter of Campbell,*289 N. Y. 509) and there was a sufficient basis in the evidence for the relief granted.

Present—Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Decree unanimously affirmed, with costs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 91884 / May 13, 2021

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20150

In the Matter of

Securities America Advisors, Inc.,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

EXTENSION ORDER

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested an extension of time until 

January 31, 2022 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution under Rule 1101(a) of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(a).

On November 13, 2020, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Administrative and 

Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment 

Advisers Act of 1940, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-andDesist Order (the “Order”)1 against Securities America Advisors, Inc. (the “Respondent”). The 

Commission ordered the Respondent to pay $3,399.42 in disgorgement, $377.40 in prejudgment 

interest, and a $600,000 civil money penalty, for a total of $603,776.82, to the Commission. The 

Commission also created a Fair Fund, pursuant to Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 

2002, so the penalty paid, along with the disgorgement and interest paid, can be distributed to 

harmed investors (the “Fair Fund”).

 

1Advisers Act Rel. No. 5627 (Nov. 13, 2020).
2

The Fair Fund consists of the $603,776.82 in disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and 

civil money penalties paid by the Respondent.

In its request for an extension of time, the Division states that additional time is needed to 

locate and verify contact information for investors, compile investor records, complete the fund 

administrator solicitation and appointment process, develop the distribution methodology, and 

develop the plan of distribution.

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s 

request for an extension of time until January 31, 2022 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution 

is granted. 

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.2

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

2

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(i).
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7205]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Delta-Bienville Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Delta-Bienville Resource Advisory Committee will meet in 
Forest, Mississippi. The committee is meeting as authorized under the 
Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-
343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The 
purpose of the meeting is to review and approve project proposals.

DATES: The meeting will be held on April 11, 2011, and will begin at 6 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Bienville Ranger District 
Work Center, Hwy 501 South, 935A South Raleigh St., Forest, Mississippi 
39074. Written comments should be sent to Michael T. Esters, Bienville 
Ranger District Office, 3473 Hwy 35 South, Forest, Mississippi 39074. 
Comments may also be sent via e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#84e9e1f7f0e1f6f7c4e2f7aae2e1e0aaf1f7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="026f6771766770714264712c6467662c7771">[email protected]</span></a>, or via 
facsimile to 601 469-2513.
    All comments, including names and addresses when provided, are 
placed in the record and are available for public inspection and 
copying. The public may inspect comments received at Bienville Ranger 
District Office, 3473 Hwy 35 South, Forest, Mississippi 39074. Visitors 
are encouraged to call ahead to 601 469-3811 to facilitate entry into 
the building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nefisia Kittrell, RAC coordinator, 
USDA, Bienville Ranger District Office, 3473 Hwy 35 South, Forest, 
Mississippi; (601) 469-3811; E-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f29c999b868680979e9eb29481dc949796dc8781"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a8c6c3c1dcdcdacdc4c4e8cedb86cecdcc86dddb">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) 
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through 
Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. The 
following business will be conducted: (1) Review project proposals and 
recommendations. Persons who wish to bring related matters to the 
attention of the Committee may file written statements with the 
Committee staff before or after the meeting.

    Dated: March 18, 2011.
Michael T. Esters,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-7205 Filed 3-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 233.5 Aliens entering Guam pursuant to section 14 of Public Law 99-396, “Omnibus Territories Act.”

A transportation line bringing aliens to Guam under the visa waiver provisions of § 212.1(e) of this chapter shall enter into an agreement on Form I-760. Such agreements shall be negotiated directly by the Service's Headquarters and head offices of the transportation lines.

[62 FR 10353, Mar. 6, 1997]
#### § 387.5 What types of projects are authorized under this program?

The Innovative Rehabilitation Training Program supports time-limited pilot projects through which new types of rehabilitation workers may be trained or through which innovative methods of training rehabilitation personnel may be demonstrated.

(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 302 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 772))