# Official Journal C 374/2011

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.374.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 374 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5422 December 2011 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.374.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 374

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5422 December 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions |
| | OPINIONS |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 374/01 | Commission Opinion of 21 December 2011 relating to the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste arising from the Penly EPR reactor (unit 3), located in France, in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty | 1 |
| 2011/C 374/02 | Commission Opinion of 21 December 2011 relating to the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste arising from the New Low-level Waste Facilities, located adjacent to the Dounreay nuclear licensed site in Scotland, United Kingdom, in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

OPINIONS

European Commission

2011/C 374/01

Commission Opinion of 21 December 2011 relating to the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste arising from the Penly EPR reactor (unit 3), located in France, in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty

1

2011/C 374/02

Commission Opinion of 21 December 2011 relating to the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste arising from the New Low-level Waste Facilities, located adjacent to the Dounreay nuclear licensed site in Scotland, United Kingdom, in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty

3

| | II   Information |
| --- | --- |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 374/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6429 — Hyundai Motor Company/Hyundai Motor Deutschland/Automobiles Hyundai France/FAAP/FEA) (
  1
  ) | 5 |
| 2011/C 374/04 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6437 — Enterprise Holding/Citer) (
  1
  ) | 5 |

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 374/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6429 — Hyundai Motor Company/Hyundai Motor Deutschland/Automobiles Hyundai France/FAAP/FEA) (
  1
  )

1

5

2011/C 374/04

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6437 — Enterprise Holding/Citer) (
  1
  )

1

5

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 374/05 | Euro exchange rates | 6 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2011/C 374/06 | Information from Spain concerning implementation of Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council | 7 |
| 2011/C 374/07 | Information related to the Commission’s compiled list of Member States’ trusted lists as notified under Commission Decision 2009/767/EC | 8 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 374/05

Euro exchange rates

6

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2011/C 374/06

Information from Spain concerning implementation of Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council

7

2011/C 374/07

Information related to the Commission’s compiled list of Member States’ trusted lists as notified under Commission Decision 2009/767/EC

8

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 374/08 | Call for proposal EAC/01/12 — Youth in Action programme 2007-2013 | 9 |
| 2011/C 374/09 | Call for proposals for actions in the field of energy under the Intelligent Energy — Europe programme (Decision No 1639/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 310, 9.11.2006, p. 15)) | 14 |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | EFTA Court |
| 2011/C 374/10 | Judgment of the Court of 20 September 2011 in Case E-5/11 — EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Kingdom of Norway (Failure by a Contracting Party to fulfil its obligations — Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2002 establishing a European Maritime Safety Agency — Regulation (EC) No 1891/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on multiannual funding for the action of the European Maritime Safety Agency in the field of response to pollution caused by ships and amending Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002) | 15 |
| 2011/C 374/11 | Action brought on 19 October 2011 by DB Schenker against the EFTA Surveillance Authority (Case E-14/11) | 16 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2011/C 374/08

Call for proposal EAC/01/12 — Youth in Action programme 2007-2013

9

2011/C 374/09

Call for proposals for actions in the field of energy under the Intelligent Energy — Europe programme (Decision No 1639/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 310, 9.11.2006, p. 15))

14

COURT PROCEEDINGS

EFTA Court

2011/C 374/10

Judgment of the Court of 20 September 2011 in Case E-5/11 — EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Kingdom of Norway (Failure by a Contracting Party to fulfil its obligations — Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2002 establishing a European Maritime Safety Agency — Regulation (EC) No 1891/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on multiannual funding for the action of the European Maritime Safety Agency in the field of response to pollution caused by ships and amending Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002)

(Failure by a Contracting Party to fulfil its obligations — Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2002 establishing a European Maritime Safety Agency — Regulation (EC) No 1891/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on multiannual funding for the action of the European Maritime Safety Agency in the field of response to pollution caused by ships and amending Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002)

15

2011/C 374/11

Action brought on 19 October 2011 by DB Schenker against the EFTA Surveillance Authority (Case E-14/11)

16

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2011/C 374/12 | Corrigendum to the Report on the annual accounts of the Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation for the financial year 2010, together with the Agency's replies (OJ C 366, 15.12.2011) | 17 |

Corrigenda

2011/C 374/12

Corrigendum to the Report on the annual accounts of the Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation for the financial year 2010, together with the Agency's replies (OJ C 366, 15.12.2011)

17

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

I Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

OPINIONS

European Commission

| 22.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/1

---

COMMISSION OPINION

of 21 December 2011

relating to the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste arising from the Penly EPR reactor (unit 3), located in France, in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty

(Only the French text is authentic)

2011/C 374/01

The assessment below is carried out under the provisions of the Euratom Treaty, without prejudice to any additional assessments to be carried out under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the obligations stemming from it and from secondary legislation.

On 15 April 2011, the European Commission received from the French Government, in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty, General Data relating to the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste arising from the Penly EPR reactor (unit 3), located in France.

On the basis of these data and the complementary information provided by French Government representatives at the meeting of the Group of Experts on 28 and 29 September 2011, the Commission has drawn up the following opinion:

| 1. | The distance from the site to the nearest Member States is 106 km for the United Kingdom and 139 km for Belgium. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The distance from the site to the nearest Member States is 106 km for the United Kingdom and 139 km for Belgium.

| 2. | Under normal operating conditions, the discharges of liquid and gaseous effluents are not liable to cause an exposure of the population of another Member State that is significant from the point of view of health. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Under normal operating conditions, the discharges of liquid and gaseous effluents are not liable to cause an exposure of the population of another Member State that is significant from the point of view of health.

| 3. | Solid radioactive waste will be temporarily stored on site before its transfer to disposal facilities authorised by the French Government. Spent fuel elements will be temporarily stored on site, awaiting their transport to the reprocessing plant at La Hague. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Solid radioactive waste will be temporarily stored on site before its transfer to disposal facilities authorised by the French Government. Spent fuel elements will be temporarily stored on site, awaiting their transport to the reprocessing plant at La Hague.

| 4. | In the event of unplanned releases of radioactive effluents, which may follow an accident of the type and magnitude considered in the General Data, the doses likely to be received by the population in another Member State would not be significant from the point of view of health. |
| --- | --- |

4.

In the event of unplanned releases of radioactive effluents, which may follow an accident of the type and magnitude considered in the General Data, the doses likely to be received by the population in another Member State would not be significant from the point of view of health.

In conclusion, the Commission is of the opinion that the implementation of the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste in whatever form arising from the Penly EPR reactor (unit 3), located in France, both in normal operation and in the event of an accident of the type and magnitude considered in the General Data, is not liable to result in a radioactive contamination, significant from the point of view of health, of the water, soil or airspace of another Member State.

Done at Brussels, 21 December 2011.

For the Commission

Günther OETTINGER

Member of the Commission

---

| 22.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/3

---

COMMISSION OPINION

of 21 December 2011

relating to the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste arising from the New Low-level Waste Facilities, located adjacent to the Dounreay nuclear licensed site in Scotland, United Kingdom, in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty

(Only the English text is authentic)

2011/C 374/02

The assessment below is carried out under the provisions of the Euratom Treaty, without prejudice to any additional assessments to be carried out under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the obligations stemming from it and from secondary legislation.

On 29 June 2011, the European Commission received from the United Kingdom Government, in accordance with Article 37 of the Euratom Treaty, General Data relating to the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste arising from the New Low-level Waste Facilities, located adjacent to the Dounreay nuclear licensed site in Scotland, United Kingdom.

On the basis of these data and additional information requested by the Commission on 11 July 2011 and provided by the United Kingdom authorities on 25 August 2011, and following consultation with the Group of Experts, the Commission has drawn up the following opinion:

| 1. | The distance between the New Low-level Waste Facilities and the nearest point of another Member State, in this case the Republic of Ireland is some 600 km. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The distance between the New Low-level Waste Facilities and the nearest point of another Member State, in this case the Republic of Ireland is some 600 km.

| 2. | During the New Low-level Waste Facilities’ operational period:






  — | Radioactive waste will be emplaced in the New Low-level Waste Facilities without intention of retrieval. |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

During the New Low-level Waste Facilities’ operational period:

—

Radioactive waste will be emplaced in the New Low-level Waste Facilities without intention of retrieval.

| — | The New Low-level Waste Facilities will not be subject to a discharge authorisation for liquid and gaseous radioactive effluents. Under normal operating conditions, radioactive gases and liquids will not be released from the New Low-level Waste Facilities. Under normal operating conditions the New Low-level Waste Facilities will not be liable to affect the health of the population of another Member State. |
| --- | --- |

—

The New Low-level Waste Facilities will not be subject to a discharge authorisation for liquid and gaseous radioactive effluents. Under normal operating conditions, radioactive gases and liquids will not be released from the New Low-level Waste Facilities. Under normal operating conditions the New Low-level Waste Facilities will not be liable to affect the health of the population of another Member State.

| — | In the event of unplanned releases of radioactive effluents, that may follow the accidents of the type and magnitude considered in the General Data, the doses likely to be received by the population in another Member State would not be significant from the point of view of health. |
| --- | --- |

—

In the event of unplanned releases of radioactive effluents, that may follow the accidents of the type and magnitude considered in the General Data, the doses likely to be received by the population in another Member State would not be significant from the point of view of health.

| 3. | Beyond the New Low-level Waste Facilities’ operational period:
  The measures envisaged for the final closure of the New Low-level Waste Facilities as described in the General Data provide reliance that the conclusions under point 2 above will remain valid in the long-term. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Beyond the New Low-level Waste Facilities’ operational period:

The measures envisaged for the final closure of the New Low-level Waste Facilities as described in the General Data provide reliance that the conclusions under point 2 above will remain valid in the long-term.

In conclusion, the Commission is of the opinion that the implementation of the plan for the disposal of radioactive waste in whatever form arising from the New Low-level Waste Facilities located adjacent to the Dounreay nuclear licensed site in Scotland, United Kingdom, during its normal operational life and after its final closure, as well as in the event of accidents of the type and magnitude considered in the General Data, is not liable to result in a radioactive contamination of the water, soil or airspace of another Member State.

Done at Brussels, 21 December 2011.

For the Commission

Günther OETTINGER

Member of the Commission

---

II Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

| 22.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6429 — Hyundai Motor Company/Hyundai Motor Deutschland/Automobiles Hyundai France/FAAP/FEA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 374/03

On 16 December 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6429. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6429. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---

| 22.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6437 — Enterprise Holding/Citer)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 374/04

On 15 December 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6437. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6437. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---

IV Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

| 22.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

21 December 2011

2011/C 374/05

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3054 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 101,66 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4339 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83230 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0021 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2190 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7520 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,618 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 302,38 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6965 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4568 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3063 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,4594 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2943 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3422 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1578 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6987 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6927 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 502,28 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,6929 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2734 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5168 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 841,23 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1362 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,977 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,4525 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,820 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4223 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,0666 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,7750 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3054

JPY

Japanese yen

101,66

DKK

Danish krone

7,4339

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83230

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0021

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2190

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7520

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,618

HUF

Hungarian forint

302,38

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6965

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4568

RON

Romanian leu

4,3063

TRY

Turkish lira

2,4594

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2943

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3422

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1578

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6987

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6927

KRW

South Korean won

1 502,28

ZAR

South African rand

10,6929

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2734

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5168

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 841,23

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1362

PHP

Philippine peso

56,977

RUB

Russian rouble

41,4525

THB

Thai baht

40,820

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4223

MXN

Mexican peso

18,0666

INR

Indian rupee

68,7750

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

| 22.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/7

---

Information from Spain concerning implementation of Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council

2011/C 374/06

The Kingdom of Spain has informed the Commission according to Article 1(4)(b) of Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on the inland transport of dangerous goods (1) that:

| — | For reasons of avoiding highly populated areas and routes that may be not be safe in all weather conditions Spain has decided to lay down requirements as regards the use prescribed routes for road transport of dangerous goods. The use of the shortest route is recommended to minimise the danger that the transport may present. |
| --- | --- |

—

For reasons of avoiding highly populated areas and routes that may be not be safe in all weather conditions Spain has decided to lay down requirements as regards the use prescribed routes for road transport of dangerous goods. The use of the shortest route is recommended to minimise the danger that the transport may present.

| — | Further information on the prescribed routes and related restrictions is available at:






  — | http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2011/01/05/pdfs/BOE-A-2011-211.pdf |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

Further information on the prescribed routes and related restrictions is available at:

—

http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2011/01/05/pdfs/BOE-A-2011-211.pdf

| — | http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2011/01/11/pdfs/BOE-A-2011-550.pdf |
| --- | --- |

—

http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2011/01/11/pdfs/BOE-A-2011-550.pdf

| — | http://www20.gencat.cat/docs/transit/Documents/normatives_i_legislacio_nou/legislacio/resolucio_INT_904_2011_cast.pdf |
| --- | --- |

—

http://www20.gencat.cat/docs/transit/Documents/normatives_i_legislacio_nou/legislacio/resolucio_INT_904_2011_cast.pdf

---

(1)  OJ L 260, 30.9.2008, p. 13.

---

| 22.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/8

---

Information related to the Commission’s ‘compiled list’ of Member States’ trusted lists as notified under Commission Decision 2009/767/EC

2011/C 374/07

Digest information to ensure the authenticity and integrity of the Commission’s ‘compiled list’ of Member States’ trusted lists as notified to the Commission by Member States pursuant to Article 2.3 of Commission Decision 2009/767/EC (1), as amended by Decision 2010/425/EU (2), was published in the
  Official Journal of the European Union C 45 of 23 February 2010
   (3).

The information was updated with regard to the certificate that supports the TLS/SSL secured connection for the publication of the human readable version of the ‘compiled list’ in the
  Official Journal of the European Union C 57 of 9 March 2010
   (4).

The digest information related to the certificate that supports the electronic signature of the machine processable version of the ‘compiled list’ is hereby updated with digest information on a new certificate that can be used by the Commission to sign electronically the machine processable version of the ‘compiled list’. Only one of the two certificates below is applicable at a time.

The digital certificate supporting the electronic signature of the machine processable version of the ‘compiled list’ can be authenticated through one the following digests:

| 1. | either the digest published in the
  Official Journal of the European Union C 45 of 23 February 2010:






  — | SHA-256 digest (Hex) value: d5 49 51 fe bb c5 9d 2c 2e c0 1a cc d9 2c cd 8c 9d 2c 74 44 c2 e5 51 ba 7e c0 de 62 2c 74 14 8c |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

either the digest published in the
  Official Journal of the European Union C 45 of 23 February 2010:

—

SHA-256 digest (Hex) value: d5 49 51 fe bb c5 9d 2c 2e c0 1a cc d9 2c cd 8c 9d 2c 74 44 c2 e5 51 ba 7e c0 de 62 2c 74 14 8c

| — | SHA-1 digest (Hex) value: 66 0c bd 62 c4 2e a2 8d 8b 98 37 54 bb e7 b1 4a 86 4e 01 64 |
| --- | --- |

—

SHA-1 digest (Hex) value: 66 0c bd 62 c4 2e a2 8d 8b 98 37 54 bb e7 b1 4a 86 4e 01 64

| — | SHA-256 digest (Base64) value: 1UlR/rvFnSwuwBrM2SzNjJ0sdETC5VG6fsDeYix0FIw= |
| --- | --- |

—

SHA-256 digest (Base64) value: 1UlR/rvFnSwuwBrM2SzNjJ0sdETC5VG6fsDeYix0FIw=

| — | SHA-1 digest (Base64) value: Zgy9YsQuoo2LmDdUu+exSoZOAWQ= |
| --- | --- |

—

SHA-1 digest (Base64) value: Zgy9YsQuoo2LmDdUu+exSoZOAWQ=

| 2. | or the following (new) digest:






  — | SHA-256 digest (Hex) value: 5d 39 e8 f1 16 69 50 e9 97 38 32 ad 26 6f 06 74 2c c4 a9 48 48 69 df 61 ef cb 84 9d b2 fc 60 4a |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

or the following (new) digest:

—

SHA-256 digest (Hex) value: 5d 39 e8 f1 16 69 50 e9 97 38 32 ad 26 6f 06 74 2c c4 a9 48 48 69 df 61 ef cb 84 9d b2 fc 60 4a

| — | SHA-1 digest (Hex) value: a8 4e 18 97 24 1f 85 c5 55 d0 3f 48 f5 a1 95 d6 3c 6a a6 5b |
| --- | --- |

—

SHA-1 digest (Hex) value: a8 4e 18 97 24 1f 85 c5 55 d0 3f 48 f5 a1 95 d6 3c 6a a6 5b

| — | SHA-256 digest (Base64) value: XTno8RZpUOmXODKtJm8GdCzEqUhIad9h78uEnbL8YEo= |
| --- | --- |

—

SHA-256 digest (Base64) value: XTno8RZpUOmXODKtJm8GdCzEqUhIad9h78uEnbL8YEo=

| — | SHA-1 digest (Base64) value: qE4YlyQfhcVV0D9I9aGV1jxqpls= |
| --- | --- |

—

SHA-1 digest (Base64) value: qE4YlyQfhcVV0D9I9aGV1jxqpls=

The authenticity and integrity of the ‘compiled list’ should be verified by relying parties prior to any use. The Commission accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever with regard to the content of the pointed national trusted lists which lies exclusively with the Member States.

---

(1)  Commission Decision 2009/767/EC of 16 October 2009 setting out measures facilitating the use of procedures by electronic means through the ‘points of single contact’ under Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market (OJ L 299, 14.11.2009, p. 18).

(2)  Commission Decision 2010/425/EU of 28 July 2010 amending Decision 2009/767/EC as regards the establishment, maintenance and publication of trusted lists of certification service providers supervised/accredited by Member States (OJ L 199, 31.7.2010, p. 30).

(3)  OJ C 45, 23.2.2010, p. 16.

(4)  OJ C 57, 9.3.2010, p. 15.

---

V Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

| 22.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/9

---

Call for proposal EAC/01/12 — ‘Youth in Action’ programme 2007-2013

2011/C 374/08

INTRODUCTION

This call for proposals is based on Decision No 1719/2006/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 November 2006 establishing the ‘Youth in Action’ programme for the period 2007 to 2013, hereinafter referred to as ‘“Youth in Action” programme’. The detailed conditions of this call for proposals can be found in the Programme Guide for the ‘Youth in Action’ programme (2007-2013) published on the Europa website (see point VIII). The Programme Guide constitutes an integral part of this call for proposals.

I.   Objectives and priorities

The general objectives stated in the Decision establishing the ‘Youth in Action’ programme are the following:

| — | promote young people’s active citizenship in general and their European citizenship in particular, |
| --- | --- |

—

promote young people’s active citizenship in general and their European citizenship in particular,

| — | develop solidarity and promote tolerance among young people, in particular in order to foster social cohesion in the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

—

develop solidarity and promote tolerance among young people, in particular in order to foster social cohesion in the European Union,

| — | foster mutual understanding between young people in different countries, |
| --- | --- |

—

foster mutual understanding between young people in different countries,

| — | contribute to developing the quality of support systems for youth activities and the capabilities of civil society organisations in the youth field, |
| --- | --- |

—

contribute to developing the quality of support systems for youth activities and the capabilities of civil society organisations in the youth field,

| — | promote European cooperation in the youth field. |
| --- | --- |

—

promote European cooperation in the youth field.

These general objectives shall be implemented at project level taking into consideration the following permanent priorities:

| — | european citizenship, |
| --- | --- |

—

european citizenship,

| — | participation of young people, |
| --- | --- |

—

participation of young people,

| — | cultural diversity, |
| --- | --- |

—

cultural diversity,

| — | inclusion of young people with fewer opportunities. |
| --- | --- |

—

inclusion of young people with fewer opportunities.

In addition to the abovementioned permanent priorities, annual priorities may be fixed for the ‘Youth in Action’ programme and communicated on the Commission, Executive Agency and National Agencies' websites.

For 2012, the annual priorities are the following:

| — | projects aimed at promoting young people's commitment towards a more inclusive growth, and notably:






  — | projects tackling the issue of youth unemployment as well as projects aimed at stimulating unemployed young people's mobility and active participation in society. A strong priority will be placed throughout the actions of the programme to ensuring access to unemployed young people to all the opportunities that it offers, |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

projects aimed at promoting young people's commitment towards a more inclusive growth, and notably:

—

projects tackling the issue of youth unemployment as well as projects aimed at stimulating unemployed young people's mobility and active participation in society. A strong priority will be placed throughout the actions of the programme to ensuring access to unemployed young people to all the opportunities that it offers,

| — | projects addressing the issue of poverty and marginalisation and encouraging young people's awareness and commitment to tackling these issues for a more inclusive society. In this context, special emphasis shall be placed in particular on the inclusion of young migrants, disabled young people, and where relevant Roma youth, |
| --- | --- |

—

projects addressing the issue of poverty and marginalisation and encouraging young people's awareness and commitment to tackling these issues for a more inclusive society. In this context, special emphasis shall be placed in particular on the inclusion of young migrants, disabled young people, and where relevant Roma youth,

| — | projects stimulating young people’s spirit of initiative, creativity and entrepreneurship, employability, in particular through youth initiatives, |
| --- | --- |

—

projects stimulating young people’s spirit of initiative, creativity and entrepreneurship, employability, in particular through youth initiatives,

| — | projects promoting healthy behaviours, in particular through the promotion of the practice of outdoor activities and grassroots sport, as a means to promote healthy lifestyles as well as to foster social inclusion and the active participation of young people in society, |
| --- | --- |

—

projects promoting healthy behaviours, in particular through the promotion of the practice of outdoor activities and grassroots sport, as a means to promote healthy lifestyles as well as to foster social inclusion and the active participation of young people in society,

| — | projects aimed at raising young people's awareness and mobilisation in tackling global environmental challenges and climate change thus encouraging the development of ‘green’ skills and behaviours among young people and youth workers and their commitment to a more sustainable growth. |
| --- | --- |

—

projects aimed at raising young people's awareness and mobilisation in tackling global environmental challenges and climate change thus encouraging the development of ‘green’ skills and behaviours among young people and youth workers and their commitment to a more sustainable growth.

II.   Structure of the ‘Youth in Action’ programme

In order to achieve its objectives, the ‘Youth in Action’ programme foresees five operational actions.

This call for proposal concerns the support to the following actions and sub-actions listed below:

Action 1
  —   
  Youth for Europe

| Sub-action 1.1 | — | Youth exchanges (lasting up to 15 months): Youth exchanges offer an opportunity for groups of young people from different countries to meet and learn about each other’s cultures. The groups plan together their youth exchange around a theme of mutual interest. |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Sub-action 1.2 | — | Youth initiatives (lasting from 3 to 18 months): Youth initiatives support group projects designed at local, regional and national level. They also support the networking of similar projects between different countries, in order to strengthen their European aspect and to enhance cooperation and exchanges of experiences between young people. |
| Sub-action 1.3 | — | Youth democracy projects (lasting from 3 to 18 months): Youth democracy projects support young people’s participation in the democratic life of their local, regional or national community, and at international level. |

Sub-action 1.1

—

Youth exchanges (lasting up to 15 months): Youth exchanges offer an opportunity for groups of young people from different countries to meet and learn about each other’s cultures. The groups plan together their youth exchange around a theme of mutual interest.

Sub-action 1.2

—

Youth initiatives (lasting from 3 to 18 months): Youth initiatives support group projects designed at local, regional and national level. They also support the networking of similar projects between different countries, in order to strengthen their European aspect and to enhance cooperation and exchanges of experiences between young people.

Sub-action 1.3

—

Youth democracy projects (lasting from 3 to 18 months): Youth democracy projects support young people’s participation in the democratic life of their local, regional or national community, and at international level.

Action 2
  —   
  European voluntary service

This action supports young people's participation in various forms of voluntary activities, both within and outside the European Union. Under this action, young people take part individually or in groups in non-profit, unpaid voluntary activities abroad (lasting up to 24 months).

Action 3
  —   
  Youth in the world

| Sub-action 3.1 | — | Cooperation with the neighbouring countries of the European Union (lasting up to 15 months): This sub-action supports projects with neighbouring partner countries, namely youth exchanges and training and networking projects in the youth field. |
| --- | --- | --- |

Sub-action 3.1

—

Cooperation with the neighbouring countries of the European Union (lasting up to 15 months): This sub-action supports projects with neighbouring partner countries, namely youth exchanges and training and networking projects in the youth field.

Action 4
  —   
  Youth support systems

| Sub-action 4.3 | — | Training and networking of those active in youth work and youth organisations (lasting from 3 to 18 months): This sub-action supports in particular the exchange of experiences, expertise and good practice as well as activities which may lead to long-lasting quality projects, partnerships and networks. |
| --- | --- | --- |

Sub-action 4.3

—

Training and networking of those active in youth work and youth organisations (lasting from 3 to 18 months): This sub-action supports in particular the exchange of experiences, expertise and good practice as well as activities which may lead to long-lasting quality projects, partnerships and networks.

Action 5
  —   
  Support for European cooperation in the youth field

| Sub-action 5.1 | — | Meetings of young people and those responsible for youth policy (lasting from 3 to 9 months): This sub-action supports cooperation, seminars and structured dialogue between young people, those active in youth work and those responsible for youth policy. |
| --- | --- | --- |

Sub-action 5.1

—

Meetings of young people and those responsible for youth policy (lasting from 3 to 9 months): This sub-action supports cooperation, seminars and structured dialogue between young people, those active in youth work and those responsible for youth policy.

III.   Eligible applicants

Applications shall be submitted by:

| — | non-profit or non-governmental organisations, |
| --- | --- |

—

non-profit or non-governmental organisations,

| — | local, regional public bodies, |
| --- | --- |

—

local, regional public bodies,

| — | informal groups of young people, |
| --- | --- |

—

informal groups of young people,

| — | bodies active at European level in the youth field, |
| --- | --- |

—

bodies active at European level in the youth field,

| — | international non-profit organisations, |
| --- | --- |

—

international non-profit organisations,

| — | profit-making organisations organising an event in the area of youth, sport or culture. |
| --- | --- |

—

profit-making organisations organising an event in the area of youth, sport or culture.

Applicants have to be legally established in one of the programme or in neighbouring partner countries in the Western Balkans.

Some actions of the programme are however targeting a more limited range of promoters. The eligibility of applicant promoters is therefore defined in the Programme Guide specifically for each action/sub-action.

IV.   Eligible countries

The programme is open to the following countries:

| (a) | the EU Member States; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the EU Member States;

| (b) | the EFTA States that are party to the EEA Agreement, in accordance with the provisions of that Agreement (Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway); |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the EFTA States that are party to the EEA Agreement, in accordance with the provisions of that Agreement (Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway);

| (c) | the candidate countries benefiting from a pre-accession strategy, pursuant to the general principles and the general conditions and arrangements laid down in the framework agreements concluded with these countries for their participation in European Union's programmes (Croatia and Turkey); |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the candidate countries benefiting from a pre-accession strategy, pursuant to the general principles and the general conditions and arrangements laid down in the framework agreements concluded with these countries for their participation in European Union's programmes (Croatia and Turkey);

| (d) | Switzerland; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

Switzerland;

| (e) | third countries that have signed agreements with the European Union relevant to the youth field. |
| --- | --- |

(e)

third countries that have signed agreements with the European Union relevant to the youth field.

Some actions of the programme are however targeting a more limited range of countries. The eligibility of countries is therefore defined in the Programme Guide specifically for each action/sub-action.

V.   Award criteria

| (i) | Sub-actions 1.1, 1.2, 3.1, 4.3 and action 2:






  — | the relevance to the objectives and priorities of the programme (30 %), |
| --- | --- | --- |

(i)

Sub-actions 1.1, 1.2, 3.1, 4.3 and action 2:

—

the relevance to the objectives and priorities of the programme (30 %),

| — | the quality of the project and methods proposed (50 %), |
| --- | --- |

—

the quality of the project and methods proposed (50 %),

| — | the profile of participants and promoters (20 %). |
| --- | --- |

—

the profile of participants and promoters (20 %).

| (ii) | Sub-action 1.3:






  — | the relevance to the objectives and priorities of the programme (30 %), |
| --- | --- | --- |

(ii)

Sub-action 1.3:

—

the relevance to the objectives and priorities of the programme (30 %),

| — | the quality of the thematic concept (20 %), |
| --- | --- |

—

the quality of the thematic concept (20 %),

| — | the quality of the project and methods proposed (30 %), |
| --- | --- |

—

the quality of the project and methods proposed (30 %),

| — | the profile and number of participants and promoters (20 %). |
| --- | --- |

—

the profile and number of participants and promoters (20 %).

| (iii) | Sub-action 5.1:






  — | the relevance to the objectives and priorities of the programme (20 %), |
| --- | --- | --- |

(iii)

Sub-action 5.1:

—

the relevance to the objectives and priorities of the programme (20 %),

| — | the relevance to EU youth policy objectives (20 %), |
| --- | --- |

—

the relevance to EU youth policy objectives (20 %),

| — | the quality of the project and methods proposed (40 %), |
| --- | --- |

—

the quality of the project and methods proposed (40 %),

| — | the profile and number of participants and promoters (20 %). |
| --- | --- |

—

the profile and number of participants and promoters (20 %).

VI.   Budget and duration

The programme has an overall budget of EUR 885 million for the period 2007-2013. The annual budget is subject to a decision of the budgetary authorities.

Foreseen budget 2012 for the following actions and sub-actions

| Sub-action 1.1 | Youth exchanges | 34 711 300 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Sub-action 1.2 | Youth initiatives | 12 650 000 |
| Sub-action 1.3 | Youth democracy projects | 7 850 000 |
| Action 2 | European voluntary service | 59 066 000 |
| Sub-action 3.1 | Cooperation with the neighbouring countries of the European Union | 12 592 000 |
| Sub-action 4.3 | Training and networking of those active in youth work and youth organisations | 17 775 000 |
| Sub-action 5.1 | Meetings of young people and those responsible for youth policy | 6 779 000 |

Sub-action 1.1

Youth exchanges

34 711 300

Sub-action 1.2

Youth initiatives

12 650 000

Sub-action 1.3

Youth democracy projects

7 850 000

Action 2

European voluntary service

59 066 000

Sub-action 3.1

Cooperation with the neighbouring countries of the European Union

12 592 000

Sub-action 4.3

Training and networking of those active in youth work and youth organisations

17 775 000

Sub-action 5.1

Meetings of young people and those responsible for youth policy

6 779 000

VII.   Deadlines for applications

The application must be submitted for the deadline corresponding to the start date of the project. For projects submitted to a National Agency there are three application deadlines per year:

| Projects starting between | Application deadline |
| --- | --- |
| 1 May and 31 October | 1 February |
| 1 August and 31 January | 1 May |
| 1 January and 30 June | 1 October |

Projects starting between

Application deadline

1 May and 31 October

1 February

1 August and 31 January

1 May

1 January and 30 June

1 October

For projects submitted to the Executive Agency there are three application deadlines a year:

| Projects starting between | Application deadline |
| --- | --- |
| 1 August and 31 December | 1 February |
| 1 December and 30 April | 1 June |
| 1 March and 31 July | 1 September |

Projects starting between

Application deadline

1 August and 31 December

1 February

1 December and 30 April

1 June

1 March and 31 July

1 September

VIII.   Further information

Further information may be found in the ‘Youth in Action’ Programme Guide on the following websites:

| | http://ec.europa.eu/youth |
| --- | --- |

http://ec.europa.eu/youth

| | http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/youth/index_en.htm |
| --- | --- |

http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/youth/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 327, 24.11.2006, p. 30.

---

| 22.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/14

---

Call for proposals for actions in the field of energy under the ‘Intelligent Energy — Europe’ programme (Decision No 1639/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 310, 9.11.2006, p. 15))

2011/C 374/09

The Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation (EACI) is hereby launching a call for proposals for the ‘Intelligent Energy — Europe’ 2012 work programme. The call is closing on 8 May 2012 for all types of actions except the ‘Build Up Skills’ initiative which has different deadlines.

Information on the modalities of the call and guidance to proposers on how to submit projects is available on:

http://ec.europa.eu/energy/intelligent/call_for_proposals/index_en.htm

The helpdesk of the ‘Intelligent Energy — Europe’ programme can be reached on:

http://ec.europa.eu/energy/intelligent/contact/index_en.htm

---

COURT PROCEEDINGS

EFTA Court

| 22.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/15

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 20 September 2011

in Case E-5/11

EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Kingdom of Norway

(Failure by a Contracting Party to fulfil its obligations — Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2002 establishing a European Maritime Safety Agency — Regulation (EC) No 1891/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on multiannual funding for the action of the European Maritime Safety Agency in the field of response to pollution caused by ships and amending Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002)

2011/C 374/10

In Case E-5/11, EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Kingdom of Norway — APPLICATION for a declaration that by failing to adopt the measures necessary to make: (a) the Act referred to at point 56o of Chapter V of Annex XIII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2002 establishing a European Maritime Safety Agency), as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto; and (b) the Act referred to at point 56oa of Chapter V of Annex XIII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Regulation (EC) No 1891/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on multiannual funding for the action of the European Maritime Safety Agency in the field of response to pollution caused by ships and amending Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002), as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto, part of its internal legal order within the time prescribed, the Kingdom of Norway failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7 of the EEA, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen and Páll Hreinsson (Judge-Rapporteur), Judges, gave judgment on 20 September 2011, the operative part of which is as follows:

The Court hereby:

| 1. | declares that, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to make: (a) the Act referred to at point 56o of Chapter V of Annex XIII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2002 establishing a European Maritime Safety Agency), as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto; and (b) the Act referred to at point 56oa of Chapter V of Annex XIII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Regulation (EC) No 1891/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on multiannual funding for the action of the European Maritime Safety Agency in the field of response to pollution caused by ships and amending Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002), as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto, part of its internal legal order within the time prescribed, the Kingdom of Norway has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7 of the EEA; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declares that, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to make: (a) the Act referred to at point 56o of Chapter V of Annex XIII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2002 establishing a European Maritime Safety Agency), as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto; and (b) the Act referred to at point 56oa of Chapter V of Annex XIII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Regulation (EC) No 1891/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on multiannual funding for the action of the European Maritime Safety Agency in the field of response to pollution caused by ships and amending Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002), as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto, part of its internal legal order within the time prescribed, the Kingdom of Norway has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7 of the EEA;

| 2. | orders the Kingdom of Norway to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the Kingdom of Norway to bear the costs of the proceedings.

---

| 22.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/16

---

Action brought on 19 October 2011 by DB Schenker against the EFTA Surveillance Authority

(Case E-14/11)

2011/C 374/11

An action against the EFTA Surveillance Authority was brought before the EFTA Court on 19 October 2011 by Schenker North AB, Schenker Privpak AB and Schenker Privpak AS (collectively ‘DB Schenker’), represented by Jon Midthjell, advokat, Advokatfirmaet Midthjell AS, Grev Wedels plass 5, 0151 Oslo, Norway.

The applicants request the EFTA Court to:

| 1. | Annul the contested decision in so far as it denies access to inspection documents in Case No 34250 (Norway Post/Privpak). |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annul the contested decision in so far as it denies access to inspection documents in Case No 34250 (Norway Post/Privpak).

| 2. | Order the defendant and any interveners to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Order the defendant and any interveners to bear the costs.

Legal and factual background and pleas in law adduced in support:

| — | The applicants, Schenker North AB, Schenker Privpak AB and Schenker Privpak AS are part of DB Schenker, an international freight forwarding and logistic group, owned by Deutsche Bahn AG. Schenker North AB runs the group’s business operations by land, sea and rail in Norway, Sweden and Denmark, including the subsidiaries Schenker Privpak AS and Schenker Privpak AB (collectively referred to as ‘DB Schenker’). |
| --- | --- |

—

The applicants, Schenker North AB, Schenker Privpak AB and Schenker Privpak AS are part of DB Schenker, an international freight forwarding and logistic group, owned by Deutsche Bahn AG. Schenker North AB runs the group’s business operations by land, sea and rail in Norway, Sweden and Denmark, including the subsidiaries Schenker Privpak AS and Schenker Privpak AB (collectively referred to as ‘DB Schenker’).

| — | On 14 July 2010, the EFTA Surveillance Authority adopted a decision in Case No 34250 (Norway Post/Privpak), finding that Norway Post had abused its dominant position in the Norwegian business-to-consumer parcel delivery market in 2000-2006. The applicants are pursuing a damages claim against Norway Post for losses caused by the infringement. On 3 August 2010, the applicants submitted a request for access to documents under the Rules of Access to Documents (RAD) established by a Decision of the EFTA Surveillance Authority of 27 June 2008. |
| --- | --- |

—

On 14 July 2010, the EFTA Surveillance Authority adopted a decision in Case No 34250 (Norway Post/Privpak), finding that Norway Post had abused its dominant position in the Norwegian business-to-consumer parcel delivery market in 2000-2006. The applicants are pursuing a damages claim against Norway Post for losses caused by the infringement. On 3 August 2010, the applicants submitted a request for access to documents under the Rules of Access to Documents (RAD) established by a Decision of the EFTA Surveillance Authority of 27 June 2008.

| — | By a letter dated 16 August 2011, the EFTA Surveillance Authority refused the applicants’ request for access to documents collected during an inspection at the premises of Norway Post between 21 and 24 June 2004. The applicants seek to challenge that refusal under Article 36 SCA. |
| --- | --- |

—

By a letter dated 16 August 2011, the EFTA Surveillance Authority refused the applicants’ request for access to documents collected during an inspection at the premises of Norway Post between 21 and 24 June 2004. The applicants seek to challenge that refusal under Article 36 SCA.

The applicants claim that the EFTA Surveillance Authority has violated DB Schenker’s right of access to documents pursuant to Article 2(1) RAD:

| — | by wrongfully applying the exception in Article 4(1)(b) RAD concerning privacy and personal integrity, |
| --- | --- |

—

by wrongfully applying the exception in Article 4(1)(b) RAD concerning privacy and personal integrity,

| — | by wrongfully applying the exceptions in Article 4(2) RAD concerning commercial interests, inspections and investigations and overriding public interest in disclosure, and |
| --- | --- |

—

by wrongfully applying the exceptions in Article 4(2) RAD concerning commercial interests, inspections and investigations and overriding public interest in disclosure, and

| — | infringed the right in Article 4(6) RAD to partial access to documents. |
| --- | --- |

—

infringed the right in Article 4(6) RAD to partial access to documents.

---

Corrigenda

| 22.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/17

---

Corrigendum to the Report on the annual accounts of the Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation for the financial year 2010, together with the Agency's replies

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 366 of 15 December 2011
  )

2011/C 374/12

On page 86, paragraph 14, ‘The Agency’s Replies’:

for:

| ‘14. | The amounts carried forward are related to obligations duly contracted at the end of 2010 and invoiced in 2011. Compared to the previous years, the main increases in the appropriations carried forward are related to the move to the new premises in November 2010, the costs for the evaluation in November-December of a successful call receiving 40 % more proposals in 2010 and invoices under contracts for the new ex post audit strategy progressively implemented by the Agency as of 2010. The amounts carried forward on other budget lines have tended to decrease.’, |
| --- | --- |

‘14.

The amounts carried forward are related to obligations duly contracted at the end of 2010 and invoiced in 2011. Compared to the previous years, the main increases in the appropriations carried forward are related to the move to the new premises in November 2010, the costs for the evaluation in November-December of a successful call receiving 40 % more proposals in 2010 and invoices under contracts for the new ex post audit strategy progressively implemented by the Agency as of 2010. The amounts carried forward on other budget lines have tended to decrease.’,

read:

| ‘14. | The amounts carried forward are related to obligations duly contracted at the end of 2010 and invoiced in 2011. Compared to the previous years, the main increases in the appropriations carried forward are related to the move to the new premises in November 2010, the costs for the evaluation in November-December of a successful call receiving 40 % more proposals in 2010 than in 2009 and invoices under contracts for the new ex post audit strategy progressively implemented by the Agency as of 2010. The amounts carried forward on other budget lines have tended to decrease.’. |
| --- | --- |

‘14.

The amounts carried forward are related to obligations duly contracted at the end of 2010 and invoiced in 2011. Compared to the previous years, the main increases in the appropriations carried forward are related to the move to the new premises in November 2010, the costs for the evaluation in November-December of a successful call receiving 40 % more proposals in 2010 than in 2009 and invoices under contracts for the new ex post audit strategy progressively implemented by the Agency as of 2010. The amounts carried forward on other budget lines have tended to decrease.’.

---