alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(This page intentionally blank.)
J

! r"'-

.~ ~

~ a: w

I. li LL

or.:: ~

~.,r: C

w !-

~ ~ w

:::J \_~~.

Z' ~~ 

~ 

--W'"

.;..J

a: WW I- aJ .a: '.

W ::)0

-lW I-LL

0.. a: a: W

20UJI-aJ LLI-° ~UJLLI- .

~CC~a:


'-J1

.<

cr:

:wU0

cr: 0

,J;;

~ ;10

u: W~0

C-«

C.!J

LiJ

'. J'

<:(

UI-w

a:

-IW W r-U- CLa:a: 

W

:?:OWl-m

Wu-f-;,

U-I-O

UJOO<:(Q:

UJ

rUJ

a:

<{ f-E@ u~0~

;~

~ c.s :r~

~ '-J\-:::.

II

~ ~\

--' I , I ,

o~ -~

No ~,o -0 0"

~~ 

-r

-'-::>-,

"""' ~W --~ W--- ~ 0 > c:

~~;r:~~-N--:-

~-C)C:f-#~>O

.W 2: -~ (/) 0 N 0 :s s:

Z O~W~U)~20U22:f--==U)c:

UZZf-c: f-""f-WLU~OOQOO WWUJWW

Wf-Wc:~~:2:2:22:2:

"""1ZmW .f-~~~::>~

C:-.J-== 

o~~tuc:«tnu)(/)(/)(/)

~f-U)(/)(/)(/)(/)

~~~~LI)U).~~~~~

~

I \:~

<1

14..II

U- 

~:r:

IWN

I~o

.

a: 

-c: °- 10 

>- -0-

!::: ("\/

U a... I

0-0 .

-l c: W .-

'> -

"., 

<a:--:

'"

l.U ~

'-' ~ .

0 a:~(.)

>-l.U:J

-

f-w

:?:

Cl. w

a:

<{

f-

=>~

UJ

U)

!::.

~

~

it(~-

I:~,\

.

".

.f

i~!~f I~IR!~~~~ If

... ~

...1<

ffi

~;

'~

~~

~

, 

~

j

t<

r.I

(oc'-

~~ I

I~

l~

f

I~

I ~

,t--

)~

1~

co 

>1"

OJ'I u

,«:1-

It/)

~'

ro(
California Air Resources Boarcf

Monitoring & Laboratory Division

Method 425 Recovery Field Data Sheet

Project: eUJV't$ 4

Project #:

Page:

Project Lead:

Container

., No.3

(Irnpinger 2)

I Silica GelI 

Cartridge! 

(Weight Only)

Total Stack

Moisture.

q~- (Probe Rinse)

Container

No.2

(Impinqer 1) c.-It-1

IRur

It> 11 1 ,10)

Tare

Final

Diff

r"D~~

--~-~,/~~ / o~~ ~

I. 

I 1/17, e!:-

(OOt~ 

.-1/3 Ie, 7

If;]".

.

Container

No.2

(Impin.Qer 1)

OS,tl/

..r : / 1/75-0,0

II, 3 1 -_3./,'3

Jf;J'

" ,

0\.1'

Silica (;;t:I

Cartridge

(Weight Qnly)

Container

No.3

..-(Impin er 2

10 Ii)

I.OO..~ Dl.O

q 'f ,

Total Stack

Moisture,

.Qm

Container

No.1

(Probe Rinse)

Run # c..4'ZLe...

-

-

7 L

Container el

No.2 No.3 Cartridge

(Impinger 1 .er 2) (Weight On I )

Ii)

Tare

Final

Diff

lOO ..~ 3- IJ '7

13'-0 ..~

JLf,,7

Total Stack

Moisture,

gm

-

fD l.,

{tJC.

JIf.7

ItJiJ..7

~~ I~

Container

No.3(Impin.Qer 

(Probe Rinse) 2)

Run #

Tare ¥-

Final

Diff

~:~~

10&',/

.'~~ 

'f. cf-

.~';i,L.:.\\::

Container

No.2

(!!!!~inger 1)

Container

No.3

(ImpinQer 2)

Silica Gel

Cartridge

(Weight Only)

Total Stack

Moisture, ~q3 !:1m

"S-t>~

Container

No.1

(Probe Rinse)

Run #

Tare

Final

Diff .

7,7,7

~.. ~ ~~ pH

Tare (gm)

Final (gm).

Diff (gm)

IRun#

ll.

W:IForms IStack T estingl425Recov.xls

Container

No.1

1#:

pHil

(gm)

(gml,

~m)

pH

(gm)

(gm)

(gml

Container

No.1

pHll

(gm)

(gm)

(gm.l

pH

(gm)

(gm)

(gm)
§ 303.404 Notice to parents. The lead agency must give notice when a child is referred under part C of the Act that is adequate to fully inform parents about the requirements in § 303.402, including— ( a ) A description of the children on whom personally identifiable information is maintained, the types of information sought, the methods the State intends to use in gathering the information (including the sources from whom information is gathered), and the uses to be made of the information;
( b ) A summary of the policies and procedures that participating agencies must follow regarding storage, disclosure to third parties, retention, and destruction of personally identifiable information;
( c ) A description of all the rights of parents and children regarding this information, including their rights under the part C confidentiality provisions in §§ 303.401 through 303.417; and
( d ) A description of the extent that the notice is provided in the native languages of the various population groups in the State.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1417(c), 1435(a)(5), 1439(a)(2), 1442)
§ 103.10 Precedent decisions. ( a ) Proceedings before the immigration judges, the Board of Immigration Appeals and the Attorney General are governed by part 1003 of 8 CFR chapter V.
( b ) *Decisions as precedents.* Except as Board decisions may be modified or overruled by the Board or the Attorney General, decisions of the Board, and decisions of the Attorney General, shall be binding on all officers and employees of the Department of Homeland Security or immigration judges in the administration of the immigration laws of the United States. By majority vote of the permanent Board members, selected decisions of the Board rendered by a three-member panel or by the Board en banc may be designated to serve as precedents in all proceedings involving the same issue or issues. Selected decisions designated by the Board, decisions of the Attorney General, and decisions of the Secretary of Homeland Security to the extent authorized in paragraph (i) of this section, shall serve as precedents in all proceedings involving the same issue or issues.
( c ) *Referral of cases to the Attorney General.* ( 1 ) The Board shall refer to the Attorney General for review of its decision all cases which: ( i ) The Attorney General directs the Board to refer to him.
( ii ) The Chairman or a majority of the Board believes should be referred to the Attorney General for review.
( iii ) The Secretary of Homeland Security, or specific officials of the Department of Homeland Security designated by the Secretary with the concurrence of the Attorney General, refers to the Attorney General for review.
( 2 ) In any case the Attorney General decides, the Attorney General's decision shall be stated in writing and shall be transmitted to the Board or Secretary, as appropriate, for transmittal and service as provided in paragraph (c) of this section or 8 CFR 1003.1(h)(2).
( d ) *Publication of Secretary's precedent decisions.* The Secretary of Homeland Security, or specific officials of the Department of Homeland Security designated by the Secretary with the concurrence of the Attorney General, may file with the Attorney General Service precedent decisions as set forth in § 103.3(c).
( e ) *Precedent decisions.* Bound volumes of designated precedent decisions, entitled “Administrative Decisions under Immigration and Nationality Laws of the United States,” may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office. Prior to publication in volume form, current precedent decisions are available from the Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review's Virtual Law Library at: *http://www.justice.gov/eoir/vll/libindex.html .*
( f ) [Reserved]
[68 FR 9832, Feb. 28, 2003. Redesignated and amended at 76 FR 53781, Aug. 29, 2011]
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PremierWest Bancorp (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John L. Anhorn, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                       
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period certified.
|  

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any of the Companys filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report or under such Acts.

|Date: August 11, 2008 |  | /s/ JOHN L. ANHORN     
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                      |  | John L. Anhorn         
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4794 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 449
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4794

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 10, 2020

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             March 12, 2020

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 8320 13th Avenue in Brooklyn, New York, as the ``Mother Frances 
                 Xavier Cabrini Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MOTHER FRANCES XAVIER CABRINI POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 8320 13th Avenue in Brooklyn, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Mother Frances Xavier Cabrini Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mother 
Frances Xavier Cabrini Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 449

116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4794

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 8320 13th Avenue in Brooklyn, New York, as the ``Mother Frances 
                 Xavier Cabrini Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 12, 2020

                       Reported without amendment
```
EXHIBIT 32









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the quarterly report of New Mexico Software, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer and the principal financial officer of the Company,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  August 12, 2009














/s/ Richard F. Govatski


Richard F Govatski, President


(Principal Executive Officer)














/s/ Teresa B. Dickey


Teresa B. Dickey, Treasurer


(Principal Financial Officer)
#### § 385.43 What requirements apply to the training of rehabilitation counselors and other rehabilitation personnel?

Any grantee who provides training of rehabilitation counselors or other rehabilitation personnel must train those counselors and personnel on the services provided under this Act, and, in particular, services provided in accordance with amendments made to the Rehabilitation Act by the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2014. The grantee must also furnish training to these counselors and personnel regarding applications of rehabilitation technology in vocational rehabilitation services, the applicability of section 504 of this Act, title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and the provisions of titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act that are related to work incentives for individuals with disabilities.

(Authority: Sections 12(c), 101(a), and 302 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c), 721(a) and 772)
§ 300.601 State performance plans and data collection. ( a ) *General.* Not later than December 3, 2005, each State must have in place a performance plan that evaluates the State's efforts to implement the requirements and purposes of Part B of the Act, and describes how the State will improve such implementation. ( 1 ) Each State must submit the State's performance plan to the Secretary for approval in accordance with the approval process described in section 616(c) of the Act.
( 2 ) Each State must review its State performance plan at least once every six years, and submit any amendments to the Secretary.
( 3 ) As part of the State performance plan, each State must establish measurable and rigorous targets for the indicators established by the Secretary under the priority areas described in § 300.600(d).
( b ) *Data collection.* ( 1 ) Each State must collect valid and reliable information as needed to report annually to the Secretary on the indicators established by the Secretary for the State performance plans.
( 2 ) If the Secretary permits States to collect data on specific indicators through State monitoring or sampling, and the State collects the data through State monitoring or sampling, the State must collect data on those indicators for each LEA at least once during the period of the State performance plan.
( 3 ) Nothing in Part B of the Act shall be construed to authorize the development of a nationwide database of personally identifiable information on individuals involved in studies or other collections of data under Part B of the Act.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0624) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1416(b))
### §81n. Transfer of lands for State Park

The Secretary is further authorized to transfer without compensation up to fifteen acres of the Colonial National Historical Park, Virginia, to the Commonwealth of Virginia for use by agencies of the Commonwealth in the establishment of a State Park in furtherance of the purposes of the Colonial National Historical Park.

(Mar. 29, 1956, ch. 105, §2, 70 Stat. 62.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act July 3, 1930, ch. 837, 46 Stat. 855, which comprises this subchapter.
..... o: Petge 1 of 3 20'12-'10-24 17':09:52 (GMT) '1303957'2603 From: Dqvld Strorn 

> 

. 

: 

··-,r-·'·r,u~'i-l i ~-- ~ '~ ] .. ,[ 1 .•r~'T QF 1 r

1 .··~ r •• ~,.,.~ ..•. ! r11. 1 ~~·lL . .,. 

·--···· ·.·! .... ,.,,.., ........ ,.r!CJ' I ''1/\1\ :,H JH ii\ !\ . ',·.';;;·•·~·:. {)~f)j:[) ~·r~-0~ t:" , ~ .. ~.tt\t I, r -...:n/ I l .. )r·h) 

US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATilj~ OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, oc· 

~I _, P 2: It l:t 

WESTOVER CORPORATION, 

R!:spondtnt. Judge Richard C. Goodwin 

FDMS No.: FAA-2012-0200 

FAA.Case No.:2010WP700145 

SJIBSWUTION QF COPNSEL 

Howord Bittman, o:t the request of Respondent, subject to approval of the trlb~ withdraws 

as counsel of record for the Respondent 

David A. Strom. having been authorized by the Respondent, enters his appeamnce as counsel . of record for Respondent, $1lb.jeet to approval oftM tribunal. 

f'\ 

Co~l advises that aU future docwnents, pleadings, notices and other matters should bo 

to\erlferin&~· counsel at lhc address and telephone number set furth below. · · I 

R•~::t.7· - HowardBi~ P.O. Box 4370 

J 113 Spruce Street 

•1& . ·u 

3SIS'Sourh 

na:\i{dA.StroJ:D:i6506 

Tamarac 

~ Drive, Suite 200 

Denver, CO 80237 

Telephone: (303).355-4999 

Dated October· 18, 2012. 

:, 

'' 

1 
-ro: Page :2: o1' S 201.2-'1 0-24 17:09:52 (GMT) 

US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

130:39:57:2:603 Fre>m: David Strom 

WESTOVER CORPORATION, FAA Region: Western-Pacific 

Respondent. 

Judge Richard C. Goodwin 

FDMS No.: FAA~2012-0200 

FAA Case No.:2010WP700145 

ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL. 

TillS COURT, having reviewed the above and foregoing Substitution of Counsel, and being 

fully advised in the premises, hereby approves same as an Order of the Court. 

DONE TillS day of , 2012. 

BY THE TRIBUNAL: 
-.;o: Page 3 of' 3 :2012-10-2417:09:52 (GMT) 13039572603 From: David Strom 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify -on this date I caused a true and COITeet copy of the foregoing Substitution of 

Cotmsel to be sent by facsimile and placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to 

the following: 

. ·'' ,~.£F~=~~I~h.£Cl1Jl1?1~i~Q!s ~9~~~1 .... 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009=2007 

Facsimile: 310-725-6816 

Federal Aviation Admin.istmtion 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W 

Washington DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Room 2WIOOO 

Facsimile: 202-493-5020 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Office of Hearings, M20 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-31 0) 

Washington DC 20590 

Facsimile: 202-366-7536 

Dated: October~q 2012 

~ David Strom 

3515 S. Tamarac Drive, Ste. 200 

Denver, CO 80237
#### Jacob Cash, Respondent, *v.*American Specialty Tailoring Company, Appellant.

First Department,

July 10, 1913.

Pleading — complaint in action on contract — conclusion of law—order for examination of defendant before trial vacated where complaint insufficient.

Where a complaint contains statements as to the making of a contract, the substance thereof, and that it is annexed to and made a part of the complaint, followed by an allegation that “ there is now due and owing this plaintiff under the aforesaid contract, the sum of $4,000, no part of which has been paid, although duly demanded,” and no facts are *730stated from which it can be determined whether the plaintiff claims for a breach of contract, services rendered or commissions earned, or that the plaintiff has performed or was ready and willing to perform on his part, the allegation quoted is a mere conclusion of law, rendering the complaint insufficient, and an order for the examination of one of the officers of defendant before trial, and directing the production of books and papers, should be vacated.

Appeal by the defendant, American Specialty Tailoring Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 19th day of March, 1913, as resettled by an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 19th day of April, 1913, denying defendant’s motion to vacate an order for the examination of one of its officers before trial, and directing the production of books and papers.

*H. Lionel Kringel,*for the appellant.

*Charles Soble,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam:

This appeal is from an order denying a motion to vacate an order for the examination of one of the officers of the defendant before trial and directing the production of books and papers.

The motion to vacate should have been granted for the reason that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. All that it contains are statements as to the making of the contract, the substance thereof, and that it is annexed to and made a part of the complaint. Then follows an allegation that *“*there is now due and owing this plaintiff under the aforesaid contract, the sum of Four thousand dollars ($4,000) no part of which has been paid, although duly demanded.” No facts are stated from which it can be determined, or even inferred, whether the plaintiff claims for a breach of the contract, services rendered, or commissions earned. There was no allegation to the effect that the plaintiff has performed or was ready and willing to perform on his part. The allegation above quoted, showing that there is due $4,000 is a mere conclusion of law, not based upon any facts set forth in the complaint.

*731The order appealed from, therefore, is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
### §§778d to 778h. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections, Pub. L. 89–701, §§1–5, Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1089, 1090, related to fish protein concentrate and authorized the Secretary of the Interior to promote studies, conduct research and experiments, and construct and lease experiment and demonstration plants. The authority of the Secretary under these sections expired at the expiration of five years from Nov. 2, 1966 by the express terms of section 778h of this title.

Section 778f was amended by Pub. L. 90–549, Oct. 4, 1968, 82 Stat. 936.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4971 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4971

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 1, 2020

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 15 East Market Street in Leesburg, Virginia, as the ``Norman Duncan 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NORMAN DUNCAN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 15 East Market Street in Leesburg, Virginia, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Norman Duncan Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Norman 
Duncan Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 30, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```