alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
905 A.2d 304

#### Stephen N. ABRAMS v. Linda H. LAMONE, et al.

No. 142,

Sept.Term, 2005.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Aug. 25, 2006.

Order Granting Modification Aug. 29, 2006.

Stephen N. Abrams, Rockville, for appellant.

Andrew M. Dansicker (Joshua R. Treem, Schulman, Treem, Kaminkow, Gilden & Ravenell, P.A., Baltimore, on brief), for appellees.

Argued before BELL, C.J., RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL, GREENE and JOHN C. ELDRIDGE, (Retired, Specially Assigned), JJ.

PER CURIAM

ORDER.

For reasons to be stated later in an opinion to be filed, it is this 25th day of August, 2006,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that the judgment of the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County be, and it is hereby, reversed, and the case is remanded to that court with instructions to enter (1) a declaratory judgment that Thomas Perez does not possess the Constitutional qualifications for the office of Attorney General by reason of not having practiced law in Maryland for a period of ten years as required by Article V, Section 4 of the Maryland Constitution, and (2) an order directing that the name of Thomas Perez be removed from the ballot at the September, 2006 primary election. Costs to be paid by the appellees. Mandate to issue forthwith.

*305
      *ORDER*

The Court having considered the motion to modify order and the responses filed thereto in the above captioned case, it is this 29th day of August, 2006,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that the motion be, and it is hereby, granted and the Per Curiam Order of the Court dated August 25, 2006 is modified by: (a) deleting the requirement that the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County order that “the name of Thomas Perez be removed from the ballot at the September, 2006 primary election;” and (b) instructing the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County to enter an order requiring the State Board of Elections to provide directions to the local boards of elections to: (1) post notices conspicuously in each polling location informing voters that Thomas Perez is not a candidate for the Office of the Attorney General and that any votes cast for Mr. Perez will not be counted; and (2) provide the same standard of notice to voters who will be using paper ballots for absentee and provisional voting.
§ 303.113 Evaluation, assessment, and nondiscriminatory procedures. ( a ) Subject to paragraph (b) of this section, each system must ensure the performance of— ( 1 ) A timely, comprehensive, multidisciplinary evaluation of the functioning of each infant or toddler with a disability in the State; and
( 2 ) A family-directed identification of the needs of the family of the infant or toddler to assist appropriately in the development of the infant or toddler.
( b ) The evaluation and family-directed identification required in paragraph (a) of this section must meet the requirements of § 303.321.
(Approved by Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0550) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1435(a)(3))
§ 34.22 Employer responsibilities. ( a ) ( 1 ) Our garnishment order indicates a reasonable period of time within which an employer must start withholding under the order.
( 2 ) The employer must promptly pay to the Department all amounts the employer withholds according to the order.
( b ) The employer may follow its normal pay and disbursement cycles in complying with the garnishment order.
( c ) The employer must withhold the appropriate amount from the debtor's wages for each pay period until the employer receives our notification to discontinue wage garnishment.
( d ) The employer must disregard any assignment or allotment by an employee that would interfere with or prohibit the employer from complying with our garnishment order, unless that assignment or allotment was made for a family support judgment or order.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3720D)
9

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-080-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours 

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Install battery 

enclosures and 

environmental 

control system 

ducts and replace 

batteries and 

battery chargers.

112.0 $9,520.0

0 $455,158 $464,678.00 6 $2,788,068.00

Revise 

maintenance 

program

1.0 $ 85.00 $0 $ 85.00 6 $ 510.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $2,788,578

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00
10

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): According to the 

manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the 

cost impact on affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected individuals. 

As a result, we have included all costs in our cost estimate.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: This AD is for transport aircraft that are primarly operated by large commercial 

airlines.

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
Exhibit 31.1

                          Section 302 Certification
                       Annual Report on Form 10-KSB

I, Stanley J. Wolfson, certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-KSB of Clancy Systems
International, Inc.;

1.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

2.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;

3.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the small business issuer and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small
business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter
(the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

<PAGE>

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the
audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting.


Date: December  22, 2006

/s/Stanley J. Wolfson
Chief Executive Officer







<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                          JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                      0
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            0
<PP&E>                                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  16,395
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                1,018
<OTHER-SE>                                            (17,413)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                0
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            0
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       16,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (16,300)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (16,300)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (16,300)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.02)



</TABLE>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

 Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

613 

CA 13-01771 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN WAGNER, 

DECEASED. 

-------------------------------------------- 

CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; 

 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SALLY BAUMANN, OBJECTANT-RESPONDENT; 

 

COLIN DESROSIERS AND MICHELLE DESROSIERS, 

OBJECTANTS-APPELLANTS. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

LACY KATZEN LLP, ROCHESTER (RACHELLE H. NUHFER OF COUNSEL), FOR 

OBJECTANTS-APPELLANTS. 

LAW OFFICE OF HEIDI W. FEINBERG, ROCHESTER (HEIDI W. FEINBERG OF COUNSEL), 

FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (RENÉ H. REIXACH OF COUNSEL), FOR 

OBJECTANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Surrogate=s Court, Monroe County (Edmund 

A. Calvaruso, S.), entered July 18, 2013. The order, among other things, 

terminated a testamentary trust. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed. 

Same Memorandum as in Matter of Wagner ([appeal No. 2] ___ AD3d ___ 

[Aug. 8, 2014]).

Entered: August 8, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
# Official Journal L 346/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 346 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5123 December 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 346

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5123 December 2008

---

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | Commission |
| | | 2008/948/EC |
| | * | Commission Decision of 23 July 2008 on measures by Germany to assist DHL and Leipzig Halle Airport C 48/06 (ex N 227/06) (notified under document number C(2008) 3512)
   (1) | 1 |
| | | 2008/949/EC |
| | * | Commission Decision of 6 November 2008 adopting a multiannual Community programme pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 199/2008 establishing a Community framework for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector and support for scientific advice regarding the common fisheries policy | 37 |
| | | GUIDELINES |
| | | European Central Bank |
| | | 2008/950/EC |
| | * | Guideline of the European Central Bank of 11 September 2008 on data collection regarding the euro and the operation of the Currency Information System 2 (ECB/2008/8) | 89 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

DECISIONS

Commission

2008/948/EC

*

Commission Decision of 23 July 2008 on measures by Germany to assist DHL and Leipzig Halle Airport C 48/06 (ex N 227/06) (notified under document number C(2008) 3512)
   (1)

(notified under document number C(2008) 3512)

1

2008/949/EC

*

Commission Decision of 6 November 2008 adopting a multiannual Community programme pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 199/2008 establishing a Community framework for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector and support for scientific advice regarding the common fisheries policy

37

GUIDELINES

European Central Bank

2008/950/EC

*

Guideline of the European Central Bank of 11 September 2008 on data collection regarding the euro and the operation of the Currency Information System 2 (ECB/2008/8)

(ECB/2008/8)

89

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Note to the reader(see page 3 of the cover) | s3 |

*

Note to the reader(see page 3 of the cover)

Note to the reader

s3

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### § 245.3 Adjustment of status under section 13 of the Act of September 11, 1957, as amended.

Any application for benefits under section 13 of the Act of September 11, 1957, as amended, must be filed on Form I-485 with the director having jurisdiction over the applicant's place of residence. The benefits under section 13 are limited to aliens who were admitted into the United States under section 101, paragraphs (a)(15)(A)(i), (a)(15)(A)(ii), (a)(15)(G)(i), or (a)(15)(G)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act who performed diplomatic or semi-diplomatic duties and to their immediate families, and who establish that there are compelling reasons why the applicant or the member of the applicant's immediate family is unable to return to the country represented by the government which accredited the applicant and that adjustment of the applicant's status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence would be in the national interest. Aliens whose duties were of a custodial, clerical, or menial nature, and members of their immediate families, are not eligible for benefits under section 13. In view of the annual limitation of 50 on the number of aliens whose status may be adjusted under section 13, any alien who is prima facie eligible for adjustment of status to that of a lawful permanent resident under another provision of law shall be advised to apply for adjustment pursuant to such other provision of law. An applicant for the benefits of section 13 shall not be subject to the labor certification requirement of section 212(a)(14) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The applicant shall be notified of the decision and, if the application is denied, of the reasons for the denial and of the right to appeal under the provisions of part 103 of this chapter. Any applications pending with the Service before December 29, 1981 must be resubmitted to comply with the requirements of this section.

(Secs. 103, 245, of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended; 71 Stat. 642, as amended, sec. 17, Pub. L. 97-116, 95 Stat. 1619 (8 U.S.C. 1103, 1255, 1255b))

[47 FR 44238, Oct. 7, 1982, as amended at 59 FR 33905, July 1, 1994]
- Newsroom        - Press Releases
      - Public Statements
      - Speeches
      - Testimony
      - Spotlight Topics
      - Media Gallery
      - Upcoming Events
      - Webcasts
      - What's New
      - SEC Videos
      - Reports and Publications
      - RSS Feeds
      - Social Media 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting; Cancellation

**FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT**:84 FR 49778, September 23, 2019

**PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:**:Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.

**CHANGES IN THE MEETING:** The Open Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., has been cancelled. 

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:** For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: September 24, 2019

Vanessa A. CountrymanSecretary
### §1302. Designs not subject to protection

Protection under this chapter shall not be available for a design that is—

(1) not original;

(2) staple or commonplace, such as a standard geometric figure, a familiar symbol, an emblem, or a motif, or another shape, pattern, or configuration which has become standard, common, prevalent, or ordinary;

(3) different from a design excluded by paragraph (2) only in insignificant details or in elements which are variants commonly used in the relevant trades;

(4) dictated solely by a utilitarian function of the article that embodies it; or

(5) embodied in a useful article that was made public by the designer or owner in the United States or a foreign country more than 2 years before the date of the application for registration under this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 105–304, title V, §502, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2906; amended Pub. L. 106–44, §1(f)(1), Aug. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 222.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1999—Par. (5). Pub. L. 106–44 substituted "2 years" for "1 year".
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 96-3196EM

_____________ Willie Watson, * * Appellant, *

* v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern United States Postal Service; St. Louis * District of Missouri. Gateway District Area Local of * American Postal Workers Union, * [UNPUBLISHED] AFL-CIO; American Postal Workers * Union, AFL-CIO, * * Appellees. *

_____________ Submitted: July 7, 1997

Filed: July 11, 1997

_____________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Willie Watson appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to Watson's former employer and his former unions in this employment-related lawsuit. Watson also seeks review of a Merit Systems Protection Bo ard decision. Based on the record b efore us, we find no error that would require reversal. We thus affirm on the basis of the district court's thorough, well-reasoned order. See8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Kurt R. Moore, President and Chief Executive Officer of Ablest Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for theperiod ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”), which this certification accompanies,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.         /s/ Kurt R. Moore   Kurt R. Moore   President and Chief Executive Officer   April 25, 2007
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications.
Title: Mineral resources of the Joyce Kilmer-Slickrock Wilderness, North Carolina-Tennessee
SuDocs No. I 19.3:1416 | Item No. 0620 | System  No. 001001092
Report  | Plate  1 | Plate  2 | Plate  3
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

 
 
 
Last updated:  September 24,  2016  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov/
  |
|--|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|