alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

JACKIE STETSON , Appellant,

v.

U.S. B ANK TRUST N.A., as Trustee for the LSRMF MH Master Participation Trust II

, et al

. , Appellee s

.

No. 4D2023

- 1636

[ February 29, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Maxine Cheesman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502008CA039724.

Jackie Stetson, Lake Worth Beach, pro se

.

Adam A

. Diaz of Diaz Anselmo & Associates, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for

ap pellee U.S. Bank Trust N.A., as Trustee for the LSRMF MH Master Participation Trust II

.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

D AMOORGIAN , C IKLIN and G ERBER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
R 9 W R 8 W R 7 W R 6 W R 5 W R 4 W R 3 W 

6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 6 

17601 

200 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

17233 

Lincoln T 14 N Bureau of Land Management 

17231 

31 36 31 36 

31 36 31 36 31 36 31 

7705 

36 

7704 

31 

6 1 

6 1 

6 1 6 7801 

1 6 1 6 1 6 

7709 

7802 

Butte Field Office 

7833 

Draft RMP/EIS 

T 13 N 

31 36 

31 36 31 36 31 36 31 

7801 

36 31 36 31 

Grazing Allotment Map 1 

Elliston, Montana Quad 

6 1 6 1 

6 1 6 1 6 

7806 

279 

7800 Butte Field Office 

7807 

7801 T 12 N 

7801 

7809 7801 

15 

7803 7808 7804 7810 

31 

31 36 31 

7813 

36 

36 31 36 31 

6 1 6 1 

6 936 1 6 1 6 

7811 

Missoula 11027 

Field Office T 11 N 

7822 7823 

7815 

31 36 

31 7816 36 

7817 

31 

36 7830 

31 

0 50 100 

Miles 

7828 

7828 

1 6 

7820 7819 7821 

1 6 1 6 

7824 

Map shows existing grazing allotments found 

T 10 N within the boundaries of the Elliston, Montana 

1:100,000 USGS topographic map series 

7826 

Helena

7827 

36 31 12 

36 

7829 

31 36 31 

Map generated by the Butte Field Office in February 2007 

1 6 1 6 1 6 

Universal Transverse Mercator NAD 27 Projection 

20283 20224 

7829 

7829 7829 20283 20283 

20283 

T 9 N 

This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of 

Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data 

for individual or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by 

20283 BLM. This map may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product 

was developed through digital means and information may be updated without 

36 31 36 31 36 31 20254 notification. 

Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Private 1 inch equals 1.58 miles Allotment Boundary 

Bureau of Reclamation State Miles Field Office Boundary 

0 10 20 Interstate 

Local Government US Fish and Wildlife Service US Route 

MT Route 

National Park Service (NPS) US Forest Service (USFS) MT Secondary 

Road 

Other Federal Land Water
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4981 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

2505 Derita Avenue in Charlotte, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Julius L. 

Chambers Civil Rights Memorial Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 5, 2019 

Ms. ADAMS (for herself, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Mr. HOLDING, Mr. MURPHY of 

North Carolina, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, Ms. FOXX of North Carolina, Mr. WALKER, Mr. ROUZER, Mr. HUDSON, Mr. BISHOP of North 

Carolina, Mr. MCHENRY, Mr. MEADOWS, and Mr. BUDD) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2505 Derita Avenue in Charlotte, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Julius L. Chambers Civil Rights Memorial 

Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JULIUS L. CHAMBERS CIVIL RIGHTS MEMORIAL 

4 POST OFFICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 2505 Derita Avenue in Charlotte, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4981 IH

1 North Carolina, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Julius L. Chambers Civil Rights Memorial Post Office’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Julius L. Chambers 

7 Civil Rights Memorial Post Office’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
§ 397.1 Purpose. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to set forth requirements the designated State units and State and local educational agencies must satisfy to ensure that individuals with disabilities, especially youth with disabilities, have a meaningful opportunity to prepare for, obtain, maintain, advance in, or regain competitive integrated employment, including supported or customized employment.
( b ) This part requires— ( 1 ) A designated State unit to provide youth with disabilities documentation demonstrating that they have completed certain requirements, as described in this part, prior to starting subminimum wage employment with entities (as defined in § 397.5(d)) holding special wage certificates under section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 214(c));
( 2 ) A designated State unit to provide, at certain prescribed intervals for the duration of such employment, career counseling and information and referral services, designed to promote opportunities for competitive integrated employment, to individuals with disabilities, regardless of age, who are known to be employed at subminimum wage; and
( 3 ) A designated State unit, in consultation with the State educational agency, to develop a process or utilize an existing process, to document completion of required activities under this part by a youth with a disability known to be seeking employment at subminimum wage.
( c ) This part authorizes a designated State unit, or a representative of a designated State unit, to review individual documentation required to be maintained by these entities under this part.
( d ) The provisions in this part work in concert with requirements in 34 CFR parts 300, 361, and 363, and do not alter any requirements under those parts.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 511 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 794g)
#### § 361.725 What happens if consensus on infrastructure funding is not reached at the local level between the Local Workforce Development Board, chief elected officials, and one-stop partners?

With regard to negotiations for infrastructure funding for Program Year (PY) 2017 and for each subsequent program year thereafter, if the Local WDB, chief elected officials, and one-stop partners do not reach consensus on methods of sufficiently funding local infrastructure through the local funding mechanism in accordance with the Governor's guidance issued under § 361.705 and consistent with the regulations in §§ 361.715 and 361.720, and include that consensus agreement in the signed MOU, then the Local WDB must notify the Governor by the deadline established by the Governor under § 361.705(b)(3). Once notified, the Governor must administer funding through the State funding mechanism, as described in §§ 361.730 through 361.738, for the program year impacted by the local area's failure to reach consensus.
# C_2015262EN.01003902.xml

| 10.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/39

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 30 June 2015 — Curdt-Christiansen v Parliament

(Case F-120/14) (1)

1

((Civil Service - Officials - Remuneration - Annual travel expenses - Article 7(3) and Article 8 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Fixing of the place of origin and the centre of interests - Request for revision of the place of origin - Concept of centre of interests - Change of residence of a family member - Period elapsed between the amendment of the centre of interests and the request for revision of the place of origin - Exceptional nature of the revision))

(2015/C 262/53)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Caspar Curdt-Christiansen (Perl, Germany) (represented by: A. Salerno, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: E. Taneva and N. Chemaï, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the Parliament rejecting the applicant’s request that his place of origin be changed to Larnaca (Cyprus) and the centre of his interests to Singapore, instead of Montreal (Canada), following his transfer to the European Parliament.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Curdt-Christiansen to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Curdt-Christiansen to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament.

---

(1)  OJ C 7, 12.1.2015, p. 57.

1

---
# Official Journal L 327/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 327 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6521 December 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 327

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6521 December 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/2472 of 14 December 2022 declaring certain categories of aid in the agricultural and forestry sectors and in rural areas compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/2473 of 14 December 2022 declaring certain categories of aid to undertakings active in the production, processing and marketing of fishery and aquaculture products compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union | 82 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/2472 of 14 December 2022 declaring certain categories of aid in the agricultural and forestry sectors and in rural areas compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

1

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2022/2473 of 14 December 2022 declaring certain categories of aid to undertakings active in the production, processing and marketing of fishery and aquaculture products compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

82

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
**Exhibit (32.1**)

**Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**
     For the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Timothy J. Hearn, the chief executive officer ofImperial Oil Limited (the Company”), hereby certifies that to his knowledge:
(i)  the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: March 9, 2005  /s/ T.J. Hearn Timothy J. Hearn Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,059

 1,059

 990

 984

 960

 1,028

 1,075

 1,093

 1,124

 1,157

 1,153

 904

 843

 921

 932

 896

 853

 856

 860

 860

 856

 839

 831

 826

 819

 815

 820

 869

 887

 894

 953

 951

 993

 918

 914

 940

 942

 1,021

 1,077

 1,087

 1,124

 922

 818

 800

 804

 899

 854

 844

 844

 843

 855

 835

 770

 815

 811

 813

 808

 780

 774

 805

 781

 838

 1,019

 1,024

 950

 955

 947

 996

 1,036

 1,086

 1,109

 1,142

 1,087

 840

 821

 861

 922

 869

 847

 849

 858

 858

 848

 830

 827

 822

 816

 813

 810

 818

 832

 861

 909

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

TDS

 646

 649

 603

 606

 601

 632

 656

 687

 701

 722

 688

 535

 523

 548

 586

 553

 539

 541

 546

 546

 540

 529

 527

 524

 520

 518

 517

 522

 530

 548

 578

TOTAL 28,262

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 20
County

g:\blm\buttermp\ams\FinalFigures\Fig2-17_West_Yell_CTT_Habitat_8511 

Gallatin County 

!

Three Forks 

Park 

Belgrade 

! 

Bozeman 

P
 Livingston
 

! 

GALLATIN BASIN

10020008 

Big Sky 

! 

Gardiner 

! 

Map

Location
 

90 

§ ̈¦

Butte Field Office Bureau Of Land Management I Planning Area Boundary (BLM) Lands 

HUC Boundary Bureau Of Reclamation

Rivers and Streams (BOR) Lands Sensitive Salmonid Species Habitat Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout Habitat Private Lands 

Westslope Cutthroat Trout Habitat Gallatin Basin

0 State of Montana Lands Miles Butte Field Office - EIS 10 Bull Trout Habitat 

No warranty is made by the Bureau of USDA Forest Service Lands RMP Planning Area, Montana Land Management (BLM) for use of USDI Fish and Wildlife FIGURE 2-21e data for purposes not intended by BLM. Service Lands
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7716

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SOLOMON WINDSOR, a/k/a Vincent Jonathan,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District

Judge. (CR-90-224-A, CA-96-1109-AM)

Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 19, 1997

Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Solomon Windsor, Appellant Pro Se. Nash Whitney Schott, Assistant

United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Windsor, Nos.

CR-90-224-A; CA-96-1109-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 25, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE>
Exhibit 11.  SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<CAPTION>
(in thousands except per share data)                                      1995       1994     1993
<S>                                                                      <C>       <C>      <C>  
Net income*                                                              $20,985   $10,603  $5,021

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year       9,739     9,573   9,472
Add: common equivalent shares representing shares issuable upon
     conversion of stock options (using the treasury stock method)           268      276       90
Weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents     10,007    9,849    9,562


Primary and fully diluted net income per common share*                   $  2.10   $ 1.08   $  .53


* Includes $108,000 ($.01 per share) cumulative tax benefit from adoption of SFAS No. 109 in 1993.

</TABLE>
### **CHAPTER 228A—POST-CONVICTION DNA TESTING**

Sec.
3600.
DNA testing.
3600A.
Preservation of biological evidence.
§ 200.83 Responsibilities of SEAs to implement projects through a comprehensive needs assessment and a comprehensive State plan for service delivery. ( a ) An SEA that receives a grant of MEP funds must develop and update a written comprehensive State plan for service delivery based on a current statewide needs assessment that, at a minimum, has the following components: ( 1 ) *Performance targets.* The plan must specify— ( i ) Performance targets that the State has adopted for all children in reading and mathematics achievement, high school graduation, and the number of school dropouts, as well as the State's performance targets, if any, for school readiness; and
( ii ) Any other performance targets that the State has identified for migratory children.
( 2 ) *Needs assessment.* The plan must include an identification and assessment of— ( i ) The unique educational needs of migratory children that result from the children's migratory lifestyle; and
( ii ) Other needs of migratory students that must be met in order for migratory children to participate effectively in school.
( 3 ) *Measurable program outcomes.* The plan must include the measurable program outcomes (i.e., objectives) that a State's migrant education program will produce to meet the identified unique needs of migratory children and help migratory children achieve the State's performance targets identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( 4 ) *Service delivery.* The plan must describe the strategies that the SEA will pursue on a statewide basis to achieve the measurable program outcomes in paragraph (a)(3) of this section by addressing— ( i ) The unique educational needs of migratory children consistent with paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section; and
( ii ) Other needs of migratory children consistent with paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section.
( 5 ) *Evaluation.* The plan must describe how the State will evaluate the effectiveness of its program.
( b ) The SEA must develop its comprehensive State plan for service delivery in consultation with the State parent advisory council or, for SEAs not operating programs for one school year in duration, in consultation with the parents of migratory children. This consultation must be in a format and language that the parents understand.
( c ) Each SEA receiving MEP funds must ensure that its local operating agencies comply with the comprehensive State plan for service delivery.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1810-0662) [67 FR 71736, Dec. 2, 2002, as amended at 68 FR 19152, Apr. 18, 2003; 73 FR 44124, July 29, 2008; 84 FR 31677, July 2, 2019]
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 21a0385n.06

Case No. 20

- 6434
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

JEREMIAH WALDROP, I ndividually; PHILLIP SELF, I ndividually , Plaintiffs

- Appellants ,

v. CITY OF JOHNSON CITY, T ENNESSEE , Defendant

- Appellee

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

O P I N I O N

BEFORE: SUTTON, Chief Judge; COLE and READLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

. Street preachers Jeremiah Waldrop and Phillip Self sued the city of Johnson City, Tennessee, alleging that the city authorized its police officers to move them from the main grounds of a n LGBTQ pride festival based on their anti

- gay speech. The plaintiff

s moved for a preliminary injunction, and after conducting discovery the parties cross

- filed for summary judgment. T he district court awarded summary judgment to Johnson City , but did so on grounds the city had not advanced , namely, that the officers’ con duct was a permissible, content

- neutral restriction based on the plaintiffs’ blocking an entrance to the
festival

. T he court summarily denied the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction as well

.Case No. 20

- 6434 , Waldrop v. City of Johnson City

- 2

- On appeal, both parties agree that the district c ourt erred in granting summary judgment on grounds that neither party argued below. Because the district court did not consider the parties’ arguments and record evidence on a n issue going to the heart of the plaintiffs’ claims , we reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Johnson City and its denial of the plaintiffs’ preliminary injunction motion and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion

.
§ 463.200 What other administrative actions will be applied to States' performance requirements? ( a ) In addition to sanctions for failure to report or failure to meet adjusted levels of performance, States will be subject to administrative actions in the case of poor performance.
( b ) States' performance achievement on the individual primary indicators will be assessed in addition to the overall State program score and overall State indicator score. Based on this assessment, as clarified and explained in guidance, for performance on any individual primary indicator, the Secretary of Labor or the Secretary of Education will require the State to establish a performance risk plan to address continuous improvement on the individual primary indicator.