alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      10.21

    AMENDMENT
      TO EXECUTIVE

    EMPLOYMENT
      AGREEMENT

     

    WHEREAS,
      effective July 31, 2006, CAPITAL GOLD CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
      (“Employer”), and GIFFORD A. DIETERLE, a New York resident (“Executive”),
      entered into an Executive Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”);
      and

    


    WHEREAS,
      on
      August
      29, 2007, based on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the
      Company’s Board of Directors, after review of an Executive Compensation Market
      Analysis and Report by an independent human
      resource professional services firm, the Board of Directors increased the
      salaries of our executive officers to be commensurate with industry
      standards;

    


    NOW,
      THEREFORE, to effectuate the foregoing change in salary for Executive, Employer
      and Executive agree: 

    


    1. Section
      3(a) of the Agreement is amended retroactively effective August 29, 2007 and,
      as
      amended, reads as follows:

    


    (a) Base
      Salary.
      As
      compensation for the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Employer
      agrees to pay Executive a base salary at an annual rate of not less than
      $250,000 payable in installments in accordance with Employer’s standard payroll
      practices, subject to such payroll and withholding deductions as are required
      by
      law or authorized by Executive. The amount of the base salary shall be reviewed
      periodically and may be increased at the sole discretion of Employer.


    


    2. All
      other
      terms of the Agreement remain the same.

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this amendment to the Agreement
      effective August 29, 2007. 

     

    
      	 	
              EMPLOYER
                :

            


    

    
      	 	 	 
	 	CAPITAL GOLD CORPORATION
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	
            	By:  	s/ Jeffrey
              W.
              Pritchard
	 	
              
Jeffrey
              W. Pritchard, Vice President
	 	 


      
        	 	 	 
	 	
                EXECUTIVE:

              
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	
              	s/ Gifford
                A. Dieterle
	 	
                

                Gifford
                  A. Dieterle
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of PremierWest Bancorp (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Fowler, the Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                       
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period certified.

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any of the Companys filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report or under such Acts.

Date:
November 3, 2009

/s/ Michael D. FowlerMichael D. FowlerChief Financial Officer and PrincipalAccounting Officer

---
### §783. Punishment for violations of law; liability of vessels

Every person, partnership, or association guilty of a violation of the provisions of this chapter shall be liable to a fine of not more than $500, and in addition such fine shall be a lien against the vessel or boat on which the offense is committed, and said vessel or boat shall be seized and proceeded against by process of libel in any court having jurisdiction of the offense.

(Aug. 15, 1914, ch. 253, §3, 38 Stat. 692.)
# C_2004179EN.01000902.xml

| 10.7.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/9

---

Action brought on 27 May 2004 by Commission of the European Communities against Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-221/04)

(2004/C 179/19)

An action against the Kingdom of Spain was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 27 May 2004 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by M. van Beek and G. Valero Jordana, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The applicant claims that the Court of Justice should:

| — | declare that, in so far as the authorities in Castilla y Leon authorise the setting of snares in several private hunting areas, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 12(1) and Annex VI of Council Directive 92/43/EEC (1) of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, in so far as the authorities in Castilla y Leon authorise the setting of snares in several private hunting areas, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 12(1) and Annex VI of Council Directive 92/43/EEC (1) of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora;

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The permits for fox hunting with snares granted by the authorities of Castilla y León are contrary to Article 12(1) and Annex VI of Directive 92/43/EEC for two reasons.

First, the use of snares has been authorised in the regions of Aldeanueva de la Sierra and Mediana de Voltoya, which involves the hunting or deliberate disturbance of an animal species, Lutra lutra (Otter), included in Annex IV of the Directive, which is a species of Community interest that requires special protection. The authorities of Castilla y León have recognised the presence of otters in those regions.

Second, the snare is a non-selective method of hunting, since any animal may be trapped, regardless of whether or not its capture is desired (in this case the fox). The Spanish authorities' argument that the permits contain a clause requiring other species to be freed does not mean the traps are selective, since the animals captured usually suffer injury, including the loss of limbs, by attempting to free themselves from the snares.

---

(1)  OJ L 206 of 22. 7. 1992, p. 7.

1

---
### §460vv–16. Fishing and wildlife

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed as affecting the jurisdiction or responsibilities of the State with respect to wildlife and fish in the areas designated by this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 100–499, §18, Oct. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 2499.)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.13



                                Extensity, Inc.
                         2200 Powell Street, Suite 400
                              Emeryville, CA 94608



                                January 7, 2000



Albert Pang
International Data Corporation
2131 Landings Drive
Mountain View, CA 94043

Dear Albert:

     Extensity, Inc. (the "Company") is in the process of undertaking an
initial public offering of its common stock and has filed with the Securities
Exchange Commission a Registration Statement on Form S-1 ("Registration
Statement") relating to such offering. In the Registration Statement, the
Company cites the following market research data with respect to the Internet
Commerce Procurement Applications Market compiled by International Data
Corporation:

     "... the Internet commerce procurement applications market will grow from
     $147 million in 1998 to $5.3 billion in 2003." [Box Summary, p.1, and p.
     34]

     By executing below, you hereby consent to the presentation of the data as
set forth above in the Company's Registration Statement in the manner set forth
above.

                                       Your very truly,

                                       EXTENSITY, INC.

                                       /s/ ELIZABETH IRELAND
                                       ---------------------------
                                       ELIZABETH IRELAND
                                       Vice President of Marketing

AGREED AND ACCEPTED:

INTERNATIONAL DATA CORPORATION

By:    /s/ ALBERT PANG
       ------------------------------------
       Albert Pang

Title: Research Manager, eCommerce Software
§ 235.2 Parole for deferred inspection. ( a ) A district director may, in his or her discretion, defer the inspection of any vessel or aircraft, or of any alien, to another Service office or port-of-entry. Any alien coming to a United States port from a foreign port, from an outlying possession of the United States, from Guam, Puerto Rico, or the Virgin Islands of the United States, or from another port of the United States at which examination under this part was deferred, shall be regarded as an applicant for admission at that onward port.
( b ) An examining immigration officer may defer further examination and refer the alien's case to the district director having jurisdiction over the place where the alien is seeking admission, or over the place of the alien's residence or destination in the United States, if the examining immigration officer has reason to believe that the alien can overcome a finding of inadmissibility by: ( 1 ) Posting a bond under section 213 of the Act;
( 2 ) Seeking and obtaining a waiver under section 211 or 212(d)(3) or (4) of the Act; or
( 3 ) Presenting additional evidence of admissibility not available at the time and place of the initial examination.
( c ) Such deferral shall be accomplished pursuant to the provisions of section 212(d)(5) of the Act for the period of time necessary to complete the deferred inspection.
( d ) Refusal of a district director to authorize admission under section 213 of the Act, or to grant an application for the benefits of section 211 or section 212(d) (3) or (4) of the Act, shall be without prejudice to the renewal of such application or the authorizing of such admission by the immigration judge without additional fee.
( e ) Whenever an alien on arrival is found or believed to be suffering from a disability that renders it impractical to proceed with the examination under the Act, the examination of such alien, members of his or her family concerning whose admissibility it is necessary to have such alien testify, and any accompanying aliens whose protection or guardianship will be required should such alien be found inadmissible shall be deferred for such time and under such conditions as the district director in whose district the port is located imposes.
[62 FR 10355, Mar. 6, 1997]
#### § 110.1 What is the purpose of ED's age discrimination regulations?

The purpose of these regulations is to set out ED's rules for implementing the Age Discrimination Act of 1975. The Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance. The Act permits federally assisted programs or activities, and recipients of Federal funds, to continue to use age distinctions and factors other than age that meet the requirements of the Act.

(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6101-6103)

[58 FR 40197, July 27, 1993, as amended at 65 FR 68056, Nov. 13, 2000]
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PremierWest Bancorp (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tom Anderson, the Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                       
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period certified.
|  

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any of the Companys filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report or under such Acts.

|Date: July 27, 2007 |  | /s/ TOM ANDERSON                                
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | Tom Anderson                                    
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
|                    |  | Officer                                         

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 479 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate the diversity 

immigrant program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 10, 2019 

Mr. POSEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate 

the diversity immigrant program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as— 

5 (1) the ‘‘Security and Fairness Enhancement 

6 for America Act of 2019’’; or 

7 (2) the ‘‘SAFE for America Act’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 479 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF DIVERSITY IMMIGRANT PRO2 GRAM. 

3 (a) WORLDWIDE LEVEL OF DIVERSITY IMMI4 GRANTS.—Section 201 of the Immigration and Nation5 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151) is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a)— 

7 (A) by inserting ‘‘and’’ at the end of para8 graph (1); 

9 (B) by striking ‘‘; and’’ at the end of para10 graph (2) and inserting a period; and 

11 (C) by striking paragraph (3); and 

12 (2) by striking subsection (e). 

13 (b) ALLOCATION OF DIVERSITY IMMIGRANT VISAS.— 

14 Section 203 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1153) is amended— 

15 (1) by striking subsection (c); 

16 (2) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘(a), (b), or 

17 (c),’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) or (b),’’; 

18 (3) in subsection (e), by striking paragraph (2) 

19 and redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2); 

20 (4) in subsection (f), by striking ‘‘(a), (b), or 

21 (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) or (b)’’; and 

22 (5) in subsection (g), by striking ‘‘(a), (b), and 

23 (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) and (b)’’. 

24 (c) PROCEDURE FOR GRANTING IMMIGRANT STA25 TUS.—Section 204 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) is amend26 ed— 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 479 IH

1 (1) by striking subsection (a)(1)(I); and 

2 (2) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘(a), (b), or 

3 (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) or (b)’’. 

4 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 this section shall take effect on October 1, 2019. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: Maria Race <MRace@MWGen.com> Date: 7/22/2010 10:51 AM Subject: Re: Fw: ICR extension request letter Attachments: pic07321.gif; 3624_001.pdf

Greetings,

EPA has reviewed your extension requ est for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire for the following Midwest Generation, EME facilities:

Crawford Fisk Street Grant Town Power Plant Homer City Station Joliet 9 Joliet 29 Powerton Waukegan Will County

The deadline for your plant to submit Version 1 and Version 2 of the completed questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010. Please note that the deadline for Part G, if applicable, is unchanged and remains 120 days after receipt of the questionnaire.

If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic07321.gif)

From: Maria Race <MRace@MWGen.com>

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Bill Constantelos <BConsta ntelo@MWGen.com>, Julia Wozniak <JWozniak@MWGen.com>

Date: 07/08/2010 11:39 AM

Subject: Fw: ICR extension request letterPlease find attached a request fo r extension to submit information required by the Steam Electric Power Generating Industry Information Collection Request. Please contact me with any questions.

Maria Race Midwest Generation Edison Mission Energy

630 771 7862 (office) 312 925 3608 (cell) 312 788 5526 (fax) ----- Forwarded by Maria Race/Chicago/EMG/EIX on 07/08/2010 10:25 AM

-----
From: Bill Constantelos/Chicago/EMG/EIX

To: Julia Wozniak/Chicago/MWGEN@EME, Maria Race/Chicago/EMG/EIX@EME

Date: 07/08/2010 10:25 AM

Subject ICR extension request letter

:

Basil G. Constantelos Environmental Services Midwest Generation Edison Mission Energy 630-771-7829 ----- Forwarded by Bill Constantelos/Chicago/EMG/EIX on 07/08/2010 10:24 AM -----

From: "Midwest Generation Ops" <chiprn518072@missionenergy.com>

To: "Bill Constantelos" <bconstantelos@mwgen.com>

Date: 07/08/2010 10:23 AM

Subject: Attached Image

(See attached file: 3624_001.pdf)
#### §§ 222.25-222.29 [Reserved]
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
 

Bureau of Land Management
 

Butte Field Office
 

Draft RMP/EIS
 

Map 23: Upper Big Hole River 

Butte Travel Plan Route Designations 

Under Alternative B 

BLM Routes	 BLM Routes with Restrictions Other Routes Bureau of Land Managment (BLM)
 

Open Yearlong Public Access Route
 Closed 10/15 to 5/15 Bureau of Reclamation
 

Closed Yearlong Non-BLM Route
 Closed 10/15 to 12/1 County / City Government
 

Decommission Interstate
 Closed 12/2 to 4/15 Private 

Malta 

Field Office Snowmobile Only	 US Highway Closed 12/2 to 5/15 State Lands 

Missoula 

Game Retrieval Field Office 	 State Highway Other Federal Lands	 Lewistown Closed 12/2 to 6/15 Field Office 

Miles City Hiking Trail US Forest Service (USFS) Field Office 	 Butte 

Field 

Office 

Water Billings 

Field Office This map is intended for display purposes. No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Dillon Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data for individual County Boundary Field Office 

or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. This map may
 

not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed through
 

digital means and information may be updated without notification.
 Field Office / TPA Boundary 

Miles Miles 0 400 0 8

Map Scale 1:110,000 

Map generated by the Butte Map shows proposed road management within the Upper Big Hole River Field Office in February 2007 Travel Planning Area under Alternative B. Under this alternative 21.1 

Albers Equal Area, NAD83 Projection	 miles of road would be Open yearlong, 59.8 miles of road would be Open 

with various seasonal closures, 51.4 miles of road would be Closed 

yearlong, 1.9 miles of road would be Open for big game retrieval (open 

each day during hunting season from 11:00 AM to 3:00 PM), and 28.5 

miles of road would be Decommissioned.
Office of Investigations | Office of Inspector General | U.S. Department of the In terior | Washington, DC 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Summary: Oil Producers Pay $1.7 Million for Trespass on 

Federal Railroad Right-of-Way in Colorado 

Report Date: December 15, 2020 Report Number: 17-0139 

The OIG investigated allegations that Extraction Oil and Gas (EXT) drilled multiple horizontal 

wellbores through a railroad right-of-way (ROW) in Weld County, CO, containing Federal 

minerals without first obtaining a Federal lease or drilling permit. 

We found that three companies (EXT, Mineral Resources, Inc., and PDC Energy, Inc.) illegally 

drilled oil wells through a railroad ROW and produced unleased Federal minerals. Based on our 

investigation, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Colorado entered into civil settlement 

agreements with all three companies to resolve the violations and recover public revenues. The 

settlements totaled more than $1,787,000. 

This is a summary of an investigative report we issued to the Directors of the Bureau of Land 

Management and the Office of Natural Resources Revenue.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 91588 / April 16, 2021

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20162

In the Matter of

BlueCrest Capital Management 

Limited,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

On February 22, 2019, the Commission issued an Omnibus Order Directing the 

Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that Establish Distribution Funds 

(“Omnibus Order”)1 authorizing the Secretary2to issue orders for calendar years 2019-2021 

appointing, upon request by the Commission staff, Miller Kaplan Arase LLP (“Miller Kaplan”), a 

certified public accounting firm, with one of their offices located in San Francisco, California, as 

tax administrator (“Tax Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund 

may incur tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department 

of the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On March 30, 2021, the Commission staff requested, pursuant to the Omnibus Order, the 

appointment of Miller Kaplan as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced 

proceeding.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Miller Kaplan, pursuant to and in accordance with the 

Omnibus Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.3

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 85174 (Feb. 22, 2019).

2

 Effective December 29, 2020, the Director of the Division of Enforcement is now also authorized to make 

appointments in accordance with the Omnibus Order. See Delegation of Authority to Director of the Division of 

Enforcement, Securities Act Rel. No. 10900 (Dec. 10, 2020).

3

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(ii).