alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 345.81 Pre-industrial training. FPI encourages the development and use of pre-industrial training programs. Such training ordinarily provides benefits to the inmate and to the FPI factory. Pre-industrial training also provides an additional management tool for replacing inmate idleness with constructive activity. Accordingly, each FPI factory location may provide a pre-industrial training program. ( a ) Pre-industrial program trainees shall ordinarily begin at the entry level pay grade (grade 5). Positions for pre-industrial training programs are filled in the same manner as other grade five positions.
( b ) Pre-industrial training is not a prerequisite for work placement if the inmate already possesses the needed skill.
( c ) If pre-industrial training is available and the worker has not completed both the skill training and orientation phases of pre-industrial training, the inmate should be put into the first available training class.
( d ) When pre-industrial training is not available, new FPI assignees will receive on-the-job training in pre-industrial pay status for a period of at least 30 days before being promoted into available fourth grade jobs.
### **CHAPTER 232A—SPECIAL FORFEITURE OF COLLATERAL PROFITS OF CRIME**

Sec.
3681.
Order of special forfeiture.
3682.
Notice to victims of order of special forfeiture.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–646, §41(b), (c), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3600, renumbered chapter 232 (relating to special forfeiture of collateral profits of crime) as chapter 232A, and renumbered items 3671 and 3672 as items 3681 and 3682, respectively.
§ 34.9 Conditions for an oral hearing. ( a ) We provide an oral hearing if you— ( 1 ) Request an oral hearing; and
( 2 ) Show in the request a good reason to believe that we cannot resolve the issues in dispute by review of the documentary evidence, by demonstrating that the validity of the claim turns on the credibility or veracity of witness testimony.
( b ) If we determine that an oral hearing is appropriate, we notify you how to receive the oral hearing.
( c ) ( 1 ) At your option, an oral hearing may be conducted either in-person or by telephone conference.
( 2 ) We provide an in-person oral hearing with regard to administrative debts only in Washington D.C.
( 3 ) We provide an in-person oral hearing with regard to debts based on student loan or grant obligations only at our regional service centers in Atlanta, Chicago, or San Francisco.
( 4 ) You must bear all travel expenses you incur in connection with an in-person hearing.
( 5 ) We bear the cost of any telephone calls we place in order to conduct an oral hearing by telephone.
( d ) ( 1 ) To arrange the time and location of the oral hearing, we ordinarily attempt to contact you first by telephone call to the number you provided to us.
( 2 ) If we are unable to contact you by telephone, we leave a message directing you to contact us within 5 business days to arrange the time and place of the hearing.
( 3 ) If we can neither contact you directly nor leave a message with you by telephone— ( i ) We notify you in writing to contact us to arrange the time and place of the hearing; or
( ii ) We select a time and place for the hearing, and notify you in writing of the time and place set for the hearing.
( e ) We consider you to have withdrawn the request for an oral hearing if— ( 1 ) Within 15 days of the date of a written notice to contact us, we receive no response to that notice; or
( 2 ) Within five business days of the date of a telephone message to contact us, we receive no response to that message.
(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3720D)
(No. 74-CC-609

#### Central Office Equipment Co., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 15, 1974.*

Central Office Equipment Co., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### § 241.22 Notice to surrender for deportation.

An alien who has been finally excluded pursuant to 8 CFR part 240, subpart D may at any time surrender himself or herself to the custody of the Service and shall surrender to such custody upon notice in writing of the time and place for his or her surrender. The Service may take the alien into custody at any time. An alien taken into custody either upon notice to surrender or by arrest shall not be deported less than 72 hours thereafter without his or her consent thereto filed in writing with the district director in charge of the place of his or her detention. An alien in foreign contiguous territory shall be informed that he or she may remain there in lieu of surrendering to the Service, but that he or she will be deemed to have acknowledged the execution of the order of exclusion and deportation in his or her case upon his or her failure to surrender at the time and place prescribed.
#### § 300.533 Placement during appeals.

When an appeal under § 300.532 has been made by either the parent or the LEA, the child must remain in the interim alternative educational setting pending the decision of the hearing officer or until the expiration of the time period specified in § 300.530(c) or (g), whichever occurs first, unless the parent and the SEA or LEA agree otherwise.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1415(k)(4)(A))

[71 FR 46753, Aug. 14, 2006, as amended at 72 FR 61307, Oct. 30, 2007]
§ 420.111 What are the documentation requirements for use of FHWA planning and research funds? ( a ) Proposed use of FHWA planning and research funds must be documented by the State DOTs and subrecipients in a work program, or other document that describes the work to be accomplished, that is acceptable to the FHWA Division Administrator. Statewide, metropolitan, other transportation planning activities, and transportation RD&T activities may be documented in separate programs, paired in various combinations, or brought together as a single work program. The expenditure of PL funds for transportation planning outside of metropolitan planning areas under § 420.109(d) may be included in the work program for statewide transportation planning activities or in a separate work program submitted by the State DOT.
( b ) ( 1 ) A work program(s) for transportation planning activities must include a description of work to be accomplished and cost estimates by activity or task. In addition, each work program must include a summary that shows: ( i ) Federal share by type of fund;
( ii ) Matching rate by type of fund;
( iii ) State and/or local matching share; and
( iv ) Other State or local funds.
( 2 ) Additional information on metropolitan planning area work programs is contained in 23 CFR part 450. Additional information on RD&T work program content and format is contained in subpart B of this part.
( c ) In areas not designated as TMAs, a simplified statement of work that describes who will perform the work and the work that will be accomplished using Federal funds may be used in lieu of a work program. If a simplified statement of work is used, it may be submitted separately or as part of the Statewide planning work program.
( d ) The State DOTs that use separate Federal-aid projects in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section must submit an overall summary that identifies the amounts and sources of FHWA planning and research funds available, matching funds, and the amounts budgeted for each activity (e.g., statewide planning, RD&T, each metropolitan area, contributions to NCHRP and transportation pooled fund studies, etc.).
( e ) The State DOTs and MPOs also are encouraged to include cost estimates for transportation planning, research, development, and technology transfer related activities funded with other Federal or State and/or local funds; particularly for producing the FHWA-required data specified in paragraph (b) of § 420.105, for planning for other transportation modes, and for air quality planning activities in areas designated as non-attainment for transportation-related pollutants in their work programs. The MPOs in TMAs must include such information in their work programs. (The information collection requirements in §§ 420.111 have been approved by the OMB and assigned control numbers 2125-0039 for States and 2132-0529 for MPOs.)
§ 751.15 Just compensation. ( a ) Just compensation shall be paid the owner for the relocation, removal, or disposal of junkyards lawfully established under State law, which are required to be removed, relocated, or disposed of pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 136.
( b ) No rights to compensation accrue until a taking or removal has occurred. The conditions which establish a right to maintain and continue a nonconforming junkyard as provided in § 751.11 must pertain at the time of the taking or removal in order to establish a right to just compensation.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 15d  14(a) I, Craig R. Koch, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 of The Hertz Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 15, 2004 By:
    /s/ Craig R. KochCraig R. KochChief Executive Officer
#### § 29.5 Notification of law enforcement officials.

In addition to the actions enumerated in § 29.4(b), as a condition of participating in the program, a State or locality must agree to take reasonable steps to ensure that law enforcement officials under its jurisdiction are familiar with the program and with the conditions under which motor vehicles may be stopped.
Summary: Oil and Gas Company Used Offshore Platform 

Decommissioning Funds To Pay Other Expenses 

Report Date: September 30, 2020 Report Number: 19-0354 

The OIG investigated allegations that an offshore oil and gas production company improperly 

paid operational expenses with money from an escrow account dedicated to paying expenses 

related to decommissioning offshore platforms in Federal waters. 

We found that the company routinely used funds from its decommissioning account to pay what 

appeared to be various operating expenses. We also found instances where the company 

appeared to claim reimbursement for duplicate expenses. 

Based on our findings, the company submitted credits and adjustments, totaling $1.9 million, to 

the decommissioning account to cover these expenses and other disbursements. In addition, we 

referred a number of unresolved expenses for non-decommissioning activities to the Bureau of 

Safety and Environmental Enforcement and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management for 

resolution. 

We referred this matter to the U.S. Department of Justice, which declined to pursue it. 

This is a summary of a report of investigation issued to the Directors of the Bureau of Safety and 

Environmental Enforcement and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. 

Office of Investigations | Office of Inspector General | U.S. Department of the Interior | Washington, DC
#### § 300.35 [Reserved]
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 7862

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TONNIE FLOYD , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Deborah K. Chasanow , Senior District Judge. ( 8:13

- cr - 00047

- DKC

- 1; 8:16

- cv - 01953

- DKC )

Submitted : March 23, 2022 Decided: May 4, 2022

Before DIAZ and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Paresh S. Patel, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tonnie Floyd seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability

. S ee 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c )(1)(B) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right

. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district court denies relief on the merits, a movant satisfies this standard by dem onstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Floyd has not mad e the requisite showing in light of our recent decision in United States v. Crawley , 2 F.4th (4th Cir. 2021)

. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
CVC Water Delivery Records

Preliminary Data Total water to be moved in Aug/Sep/Oct - 7200 plus 3550 plus 10,243 (20,993) ac-ft . Total water to be pumped at Banks - 21,642 ac-ft (20,993 plus 3% for losses)

Subject to Change Red indicates Scheduled Data Green indicates Projected Delivery Data

Blue indicates Actual Data Deliveries on Behalf of CVC Contractors (45% Allocation)

Oct-10

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Banks 

AF

Article 55 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Banks 

AF

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Tracy 

AF

CVC Water 

Pumped @ 

O'Neill 

AF

CVC 

Water 

Pumped 

@ Dos 

Amigos for 

Delivery 

AF

3% Loss Between 

Banks and 

O'Neill 

Based on 

Actual 

Pumping

Exchange from 

DWR to USBR 

in O'Neill

1,775 AF Lower 

Tule transfer to 

Westland (via 

State side)

1,775 AF Pixley 

transfer to 

Westlands (via 

State side)

Kern-Tulare 

17,443 ac-ft to 

Rosedale

10/1/2010 448 AF 435 AF Completed Completed 476 AF

10/2/2010 448 AF 435 AF August 2010 August 2010 476 AF

10/3/2010 448 AF 435 AF 476 AF10/4/2010 448 AF 435 AF 476 AF10/5/2010 448 AF 435 AF 476 AF10/6/2010 448 AF 435 AF 476 AF10/7/2010 448 AF 435 AF 476 AF10/8/2010 448 AF 435 AF 476 AF10/9/2010 431 AF 428 AF 76 AF

10/10/2010 0 AF 0 AF Complete

10/11/2010 0 AF 0 AF10/12/2010 0 AF 0 AF10/13/2010 0 AF 0 AF10/14/2010 0 AF 0 AF10/15/2010 0 AF 0 AF10/16/2010 0 AF 0 AF10/17/2010 0 AF 0 AF10/18/2010 0 AF 0 AF10/19/2010 0 AF 0 AF10/20/2010 0 AF 0 AF10/21/2010 0 AF 0 AF10/22/2010 0 AF 0 AF10/23/2010 0 AF 0 AF10/24/2010 0 AF 0 AF10/25/2010 0 AF 0 AF10/26/2010 0 AF 0 AF10/27/2010 0 AF 0 AF

10/28/2010 0 AF 0 AF10/29/2010 0 AF 0 AF10/30/2010 0 AF 0 AF10/31/2010 0 AF 0 AF

Oct 2010 Total 4,015 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 3,908 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 3,884 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 A

Sep 2010 Total 11,521 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 11,175 AF 346 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 11,175 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 A

Aug 2010 Total 6,112 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 5,912 AF 112 AF 0 AF 1,775 AF 1,775 AF 2,384 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 A

Grand Total 21,648 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 20,995 AF 458 AF 0 AF 1,775 AF 1,775 AF 17,443 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 AF 0 A

Notes:

6 af too much pumped at Banks 2 af too much pumped at Dos Amigos

V:\~WATER\~SMITH\Cross Valley Canal\03_2010 to 02_2011\Master 03_2010 to 02_2011 CVC Deliveries.xls
§ 303.24 Multidisciplinary. *Multidisciplinary* means the involvement of two or more separate disciplines or professions and with respect to— ( a ) Evaluation of the child in §§ 303.113 and 303.321(a)(1)(i) and assessments of the child and family in § 303.321(a)(1)(ii), may include one individual who is qualified in more than one discipline or profession; and
( b ) The IFSP Team in § 303.340 must include the involvement of the parent and two or more individuals from separate disciplines or professions and one of these individuals must be the service coordinator (consistent with § 303.343(a)(1)(iv)).
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3, 1435(a)(3), 1436(a)(1), 1436(a)(3))
Exhibit 32.1
                                  ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dental Patient Care America,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael Silva, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Michael Silva
-----------------
Chief Executive Officer
June 27, 2005
DEPENDIENTES Y SOBREVIVIENTES

COMPENSACIÓN POR DEPENDENCIA E INDEMNIZACIÓN A LOS 

PADRES

Las discapacidades determinadas por VA relacionadas a su servicio militar, pueden conducir a una compensación 

mensual libre de impuestos, inscribiéndose en el 

Sistema de atención de salud de VA, a 10 puntos de preferencia de contratación para el empleo federal y otros 

importantes beneficios. Pregunte a su VA 

Representante o representante de la Organización de Servicios de Veteranos acerca de su Compensación por 

Discapacidad, Pensión, Cuidado de Salud, Programa 

de Cuidador, Servicios de Carrera, Asistencia para la Educación, Garantía de Préstamos para Vivienda, Seguros y/o 

Beneficios para Dependientes y Sobrevivientes.

QUÉ ES PADRES DIC?

Compensación e Indemnización a los Padres (DIC por sus siglas en inglés) es un beneficio basado en 

las necesidades de los padres de un Miembro del servicio militar o Veterano que murió a causa de:

• Una enfermedad o lesión incurrida o agravada durante el servicio activo o servicio activo 

por entrenamiento, O

• Una lesión incurrida o agravada en el cumplimiento de su deber, o ciertas enfermedades 

incurridas durante el servicio inactivo por entrenamiento, O

• Una discapacidad relacionada con el servicio. 

QUIÉNES SON LOS PADRES ELEGIBLES?

El término “padre” incluye a los padres biológicos, adoptivos, y de crianza.

CUÁNTO PAGA VA?

Vergráficos tarifarios DIC para padres y explicaciones acerca de cómo se determina el pago mensual 

DIC para padres.

La cantidad que VA paga en beneficios DIC a los Padres destinatarios está basada en el ingreso 

contable del padre o los padres. Cuando el ingreso contable excede el límite establecido por la ley, 

ningún beneficio es pagable. Los padres elegibles deben reportar todas las fuentes de ingresos a VA 

tales como salarios, pagos de retiro, beneficios del seguro o pago de anualidades, intereses, y 

dividendos.

VA deduce ciertos gastos pagados por usted de su ingreso familiar anual, que disminuirán sus 

ingresos contables y aumentarán el pago mensual DIC a sus Padres. Una lista complete de estas 

exclusiones se proporciona en las secciones 3.261 and 3.262 del título 38, del Código de Regulaciones 

Federales .
Servicio de Pensión– Febrero 2015 

CÓMO PUEDE USTED APLICAR?

Usted puede solicitar DIC para sus Padres, completando el Formulario VA 21-535, Aplicación para 

Compensación por Dependencia e Indemnización para los Padres, y enviarlo por correo a la oficina 

regional de VA que tenga jurisdicción sobre su reclamo. Si usted no sabe cuál es la oficina regional 

que tiene jurisdicción sobre su reclamo, usted puede enviar su solicitud a la oficina regional de VA 

más cercana a su residencia actual. Un directorio de las oficinas regionales de VA está disponible en 

Directorio de Oficinas Regionales de VA.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 30, 2016

p1121 

# Order

Clerk November 30, 2016

152417(27)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 152417

COA: 328196

Wayne CC: 10

- 009059

- FH

EDWARD MOORE

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 26, 2016

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
#### § 274a.3 Continuing employment of unauthorized aliens.

An employer who continues the employment of an employee hired after November 6, 1986, knowing that the employee is or has become an unauthorized alien with respect to that employment, is in violation of section 274A(a)(2) of the Act.

[52 FR 16221, May 1, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 8613, Mar. 16, 1988]
§ 91.65 Responsible OJP officials. ( a ) *Corrections Program Office Director.* The Director of the Corrections Program Office is primarily responsible for ensuring the completion of these procedures and for working with grantees to ensure that grantees and subgrantees meet their responsibilities under this subpart. The Director also has the authority to execute on behalf of OJP all FONSIs required under this subpart.
( b ) *Assistant Attorney General.* The Assistant Attorney General of OJP is responsible for executing all records of decisions resulting from the completion of environmental impact statements on projects subject to this subpart.