alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 650.517 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To enforce any edition other than that specified in this section, the FHWA must publish notice of change in the Federal Register and the material must be available to the public. All approved material is available for inspection at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. For questions regarding the availability of this material at FHWA, call the FHWA Regulations Officer, Office of the Chief Counsel, HCC-10, 202-366-0761. This material is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html*.
( b ) American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Suite 249, 444 N. Capitol Street NW., Washington, DC 20001, 800-231-3475, *https://bookstore.transportation.org*. ( 1 ) “The Manual of Bridge Evaluation,” Section 6 “Load Rating” and Section 8 “Nondestructive Load Testing,” Second Edition, 2011, copyright 2011, incorporation by reference approved for §§ 650.505 and 650.513(a).
( 2 ) 2011 Interim Revisions to “The Manual of Bridge Evaluation,” Section 6 “Load Rating,” Second Edition, 2010, copyright 2011, incorporation by reference approved for §§ 650.505 and 650.513(a).
( 3 ) 2013 Interim Revisions to “The Manual of Bridge Evaluation,” Section 6 “Load Rating,” Second Edition, 2010, copyright 2013, incorporation by reference approved for §§ 650.505 and 650.513(a).
( 4 ) 2014 Interim Revisions to “The Manual of Bridge Evaluation,” Section 6 “Load Rating,” Second Edition, 2010, copyright 2013, incorporation by reference approved for §§ 650.505 and 650.513(a).
( 5 ) 2015 Interim Revisions to “The Manual of Bridge Evaluation,” Section 6 “Load Rating,” Second Edition, 2010, copyright 2014, incorporation by reference approved for §§ 650.505 and 650.513(a).
( c ) Office of Bridges and Structures, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. ( 1 ) FHWA-HIF-15-005, “Tunnel Operations, Maintenance, Inspection and Evaluation (TOMIE) Manual,” 2015 edition, available in electronic format at *http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/inspection/tunnel/*. Incorporation by reference approved for §§ 650.505, 650.511(a), and 650.513(a) and (h).
( 2 ) FHWA-HIF-15-006, “Specifications for National Tunnel Inventory,” 2015 edition, available in electronic format at *http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/inspection/tunnel/*. Incorporation by reference approved for § 650.515(a) and (b).
Summary: Energy Company Underpaid Mineral Royalties to 

Indian Tribes 

Report Date: October 7, 2020 Report Number: 16-0226 

The OIG investigated allegations that QEP Energy Company (QEP) failed to properly value 

minerals produced from Tribal and Indian Allottee properties for 2013 and 2014. 

We found that QEP underpaid mineral royalties owed to Indian mineral owners in North Dakota, 

Oklahoma, and New Mexico by $118,716. Subsequently, the Office of Natural Resources 

Revenue (ONRR) discovered QEP also undervalued natural gas liquids associated with the 

leases included in our investigation. This separate violation directly affected QEP’s overall 

royalty obligation. As a result, ONRR needed to complete an audit to determine any further 

extent of QEP’s royalty obligations. This matter was referred to ONRR for administrative 

resolution. 

This is an investigative summary of a report we issued to the ONRR Director. 

Office of Investigations | Office of Inspector General | U.S. Department of the Interior | Washington, DC
### §835f. Use of funds deposited to allottees; land and improvements

Funds deposited to the credit of allottees, their heirs or devisees may be used in the discretion of the Secretary of the Interior, for the acquisition of other lands and improvements, or the relocation of existing improvements or construction of new improvements on the lands so acquired for the allottees or heirs whose lands and improvements are acquired under the provisions of sections 835d to 835h of this title. Lands so acquired shall be held in the same status as those from which the funds were derived, and shall be nontaxable until otherwise provided by Congress.

(June 29, 1940, ch. 460, §3, 54 Stat. 703.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21



                                  SUBSIDIARIES
                                       OF
                                HUNT CORPORATION




                   Hunt Holdings, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
                  Hunt X-Acto, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation
                Hunt Americas Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
                Hunt Europe Limited, a United Kingdom Corporation
                   Hunt Europe B.V., a Netherlands Corporation





The Company holds all of the outstanding capital stock of Hunt Holdings, Inc.
Hunt Holdings, Inc., in turn, holds all of the outstanding capital stock of Hunt
X-Acto, Inc., Hunt Americas Corporation, Hunt Europe Limited, and Hunt Europe
B.V.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21



                                  SUBSIDIARIES
                                       OF
                                HUNT CORPORATION




                   Hunt Holdings, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
                  Hunt X-Acto, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation
            Huntgraphics Americas Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
           Hunt Graphics Europe Limited, a United Kingdom Corporation
              Hunt Graphics Europe B.V., a Netherlands Corporation







The Company holds all of the outstanding capital stock of Hunt Holdings, Inc.
Hunt Holdings, Inc., in turn, holds all of outstanding capital stock of Hunt
X-Acto, Inc., Huntgraphics Americas Corporation, Hunt Graphics Europe Limited,
and Hunt Graphics Europe B. V.
### §405a. Rules and regulations; fees

The said county court may make necessary rules and regulations governing the use of such lands and may charge such reasonable fees as may be necessary to provide funds for the upkeep, care, and protection of such reserved lands and the myrtle trees thereon, the said regulations and fees chargeable to be approved by the Secretary of the Interior before becoming effective.

(May 5, 1926, ch. 241, §2, 44 Stat. 398.)
§ 200.78 Allocation of funds to school attendance areas and schools. ( a ) ( 1 ) After reserving funds, as applicable, under § 200.77, including funds for equitable services for private school students, their teachers, and their families, an LEA must allocate funds under this subpart to school attendance areas and schools, identified as eligible and selected to participate under section 1113(a) or (b) of the ESEA, in rank order on the basis of the total number of public school children from low-income families in each area or school.
( 2 ) To determine the number of children from low-income families in a secondary school, an LEA must use— ( i ) The same measure of poverty it uses for elementary schools; or
( ii ) An accurate estimate of the number of students from low-income families by applying the average percentage of students from low-income families in the elementary school attendance areas that feed into the secondary school to the number of students enrolled in the secondary school if— ( A ) The LEA conducts outreach to secondary schools within the LEA to inform the schools of the option to use this measure; and
( B ) A majority of the secondary schools approve the use of this measure.
( 3 ) If an LEA ranks its school attendance areas and schools by grade span groupings, the LEA may determine the percentage of children from low-income families in the LEA as a whole or for each grade span grouping.
( b ) ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2) and (d) of this section, an LEA must allocate to each participating school attendance area or school an amount for each low-income child that is at least 125 percent of the per-pupil amount of funds the LEA received for that year under part A, subpart 2 of Title I. The LEA must calculate this per-pupil amount before it reserves funds under § 200.77, using the poverty measure selected by the LEA under section 1113(a)(5) of the ESEA.
( 2 ) If an LEA is serving only school attendance areas or schools in which the percentage of children from low-income families is 35 percent or more, the LEA is not required to allocate a per-pupil amount of at least 125 percent.
( c ) An LEA is not required to allocate the same per-pupil amount to each participating school attendance area or school provided the LEA allocates higher per-pupil amounts to areas or schools with higher concentrations of poverty than to areas or schools with lower concentrations of poverty.
( d ) An LEA may reduce the amount of funds allocated under this section to a school attendance area or school if the area or school is spending supplemental State or local funds for programs that meet the requirements in § 200.79(b).
( e ) If an LEA contains two or more counties in their entirety, the LEA must distribute to schools within each county a share of the LEA's total grant that is no less than the county's share of the child count used to calculate the LEA's grant.
[82 FR 31712, July 7, 2017, as amended at 84 FR 31676, July 2, 2019]
### MEMORANDUM June 25, 2009

To: S. Lutz

Via: K. Kunaniec

From: T. Underwood

Re: Outside Test NTV-644; May 6 and 7, 2009 source test of A-3 Site No: A5474 Plant No: 5474; US Mint Source No: S-8, S-9; Chrome plating tanks Abated by: A-2, A-3; Scrubber, HEPA A/C No: 19110, 4701, 20086 Cond. No. 16712; Cr +6 0.006 mg/A-hr, after 10/24/09 0.0015 mg/A-hr; By: Avogadro Group

I have reviewed the source test r eport cited above and note the following:

1) Source Test was properly notified (NST-1657). 2) I did not witness the test. 3) The testing appears to have been conducted by personnel who are familiar with proper source testing techniques. 4) Quality assurance procedures were adequate to assure data integrity. 5) Results of the referenced testing ar e that quantified emissions were in compliance with the emission limits cited above.

This source was in compliance with District Regulations.United States Mint June 12, 2009 2009 Source Test Report

09117.0c 12 

### TABLE 5-1 RESULTS SUMMARY US MINT, SAN FRANCISCO CHROME PLATING TANKS 1-2 SCRUBBER EXHAUST STACK

Test No.: 1-Cr 2-Cr 3-Cr Average

Date: 05/06/2009 05/07/2009 05/07/2009 -- Time: 1310-1611 0910-1211 1237-1538 -- Operating Conditions:

Ampere-hours/test 1,775 2,111 1,997 1,961 Ampere-hours/hour 591.7 703.7 665.7 653.7
Flue Gas:

Sample volume, dscf 108.24 105.60 105.60 106.48 O 2 , % volume dry 20.95 20.95 20.95 20.95 CO 2 , % volume dry 0.066 0.050 0.074 0.063 Stack g as tem p erature  F 77.8 77.1 77.0 77.3 Moisture content, % vol. 1.83 1.76 1.69 1.76 Stack flow rate, dscfm 2,434 2,408 2,419 2,420
Total Chromium: μg/dscm 0.652 0.568 1.003 0.741 lb/hr 5.94E-06 5.12E-06 9.08E-06 6.72E-06 mg/amp-hr 0.0046 0.0033 0.0062 0.0047
Hexavalent Chromium: μg/dscm 0.140 0.156 0.151 0.149
lb/hr 1.27E-06 1.40E-06 1.36E-06 1.35E-06 mg/amp-hr 0.0010 0.0009 0.0009 0.0009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         325,014
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               357,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                64,887
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    426,336
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           4,193
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             4,193
<LOANS>                                      2,063,048
<ALLOWANCE>                                     36,051
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,350,170
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,950,277
<SHORT-TERM>                                    44,897
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             64,190
<LONG-TERM>                                      4,455
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       163,748
<OTHER-SE>                                     122,603
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,350,170
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                173,734
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               24,952
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                10,470
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               209,156
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              64,551
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              68,054
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          141,102
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    6,881
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 229
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                128,132
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                105,580
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      62,302
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (8,168)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    54,134
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.07
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     5.8
<LOANS-NON>                                     20,390
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                28,681
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                37,402
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   11,025
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,778
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               36,051
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            36,051
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,093
        

</TABLE>
#### W. S. Cole v. Eliza A. Willard et al.

Filed November 20, 1901.

No. 10,639.

Appraisement: Mistake in Valuation. An appraisement of real estate for the purposes of a judicial sale can not be successfully assailed on the g-round that the appraisers were mistaken in their valuation of the property. *Nelson v. Ailing,*58 Nebr., 607.

Error from the district court for Custer county. Tried below before Sullivan, J.

*Affirmed.*

*Leslie LI. Kirkpatrick*and *John S.*Kirkpatrick, for plaintiff in error.

*Adolphus R. Talbot*and *Alpha Morgan, contra.*

Holcomb, J.

From an order confirming the sale of real property made in a foreclosure action the defendants prosecute error. The objection to the confirmation of sale was also presented in a motion to vacate and set aside the appraisement, and is “that said appraisement on which sale is made is inadequate and fraudulent, and is so low as to be presumptively fraudulent.” The only evidence in support of the objection consists of the affidavits of five persons, whose opinion of the value of the real estate sold was from $4,000 to $4,800, the average value being $4,240. The appraisers found the value of the property to be the sum of $2,800. The most that can be said from the evidence is that the appraisers were mistaken as to the value of the property. In *Nelson v.*Alling, 58 Nebr., 607, it is *840said: “It is now the established doctrine of this court that the appraisement can not be successfully assailed merely because the appraisers were mistaken in their valuation of the property,” citing *Vought v. Foxworthy,*38 Nebr., 790; *Ecklund v. Willis,*44 Nebr., 129; *Kearney Land & Investment Co. v. Aspinwall,*45 Nebr., 601; *Brown v. Fitzpatrick,*56 Nebr., 61; *Ballou v. Sherwood,*58 Nebr., 20; *Lockwood v. Cook,*58 Nebr., 302; *Michigan Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Richter,*58 Nebr., 463. The writer reluctantly yields assent to this rule. It is, however, firmly settled by the many prior adjudications and should, we are constrained to say, be adhered to. Applying the rule to the case at bar, the objection, with the evidence adduced in support thereof, is insufficient to warrant an order setting aside the appraisement and sale made thereunder.

The order of confirmation is accordingly

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of **VisualMED Clinical Solutions** (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Philippe Rainville, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated this 21st day of February, 2005.

 
/s/ Philippe Rainville 
Philippe Rainville 
Chief Financial Officer
### §410zz–3. Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 103–364, §5, Oct. 14, 1994, 108 Stat. 3468.)
§ 303.600 Establishment of Council. ( a ) A State that desires to receive financial assistance under part C of the Act must establish a State Interagency Coordinating Council (Council) as defined in § 303.8.
( b ) The Council must be appointed by the Governor. The Governor must ensure that the membership of the Council reasonably represents the population of the State.
( c ) The Governor must designate a member of the Council to serve as the chairperson of the Council or require the Council to do so. Any member of the Council who is a representative of the lead agency designated under § 303.201 may not serve as the chairperson of the Council.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1441(a))
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17406-17407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7330]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Proposed Subsequent Arrangement

AGENCY: Office of Nonproliferation and International Security, 
Department of Energy.

ACTION: Proposed subsequent arrangement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is being issued under the authority of section 
131a. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. The Department is 
providing notice of a proposed subsequent arrangement under the 
Agreement for Cooperation Concerning Civil Uses of Nuclear Energy 
Between the Government of the United States of America and the 
Government of Canada and the Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful 
Uses of Nuclear Energy Between the United States of America and the 
European Atomic Energy Community.

DATES: This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than 
April 13, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Sean Oehlbert, Office of 
Nonproliferation and International Security, National Nuclear Security 
Administration, Department of Energy. Telephone: 202-586-3806 or e-
mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#154670747b3b5a707d7977706761557b7b66743b717a703b727a63"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d98abcb8b7f796bcb1b5bbbcabad99b7b7aab8f7bdb6bcf7beb6af">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This subsequent arrangement concerns the 
retransfer of 44,379 kg of U.S.-origin natural uranium hexafluoride 
(UF6) (67.60% U), 30,000 kg of which is uranium, from Cameco 
Corporation (Cameco) in Port Hope, Ontario, Canada, to URENCO in 
Capenhurst, Chester, United Kingdom. The material, UF6 produced from 
U.S.-origin concentrates, which is currently located at Cameco, will be 
transferred to URENCO-Capenhurst for toll-enrichment and ultimate end 
use in the United States by STP Nuclear Operating Co. The material was 
originally obtained by Cameco from Crowe Butte Resources, Inc. pursuant 
to export license XSOU8798.
    In accordance with section 131a. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, 
as amended, it has been determined that this subsequent arrangement 
concerning

[[Page 17407]]

the retransfer of nuclear material of United States origin will not be 
inimical to the common defense and security.

    Dated: March 8, 2011.

    For the Department of Energy.
Anne M. Harrington,
Deputy Administrator, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation.
[FR Doc. 2011-7330 Filed 3-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1817/2006

of 11 December 2006         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 12 December 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 December 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 11 December 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
§ 300.624 Destruction of information. ( a ) The public agency must inform parents when personally identifiable information collected, maintained, or used under this part is no longer needed to provide educational services to the child.
( b ) The information must be destroyed at the request of the parents. However, a permanent record of a student's name, address, and phone number, his or her grades, attendance record, classes attended, grade level completed, and year completed may be maintained without time limitation.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(8); 1417(c))