alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §798. Purpose and scope of preliminary permits; transfer and cancellation

#### (a) Purpose

Each preliminary permit issued under this subchapter shall be for the sole purpose of maintaining priority of application for a license under the terms of this chapter for such period or periods, not exceeding a total of 4 years, as in the discretion of the Commission may be necessary for making examinations and surveys, for preparing maps, plans, specifications, and estimates, and for making financial arrangements.

#### (b) Extension of period

The Commission may—

(1) extend the period of a preliminary permit once for not more than 4 additional years beyond the 4 years permitted by subsection (a) if the Commission finds that the permittee has carried out activities under such permit in good faith and with reasonable diligence; and

(2) after the end of an extension period granted under paragraph (1), issue an additional permit to the permittee if the Commission determines that there are extraordinary circumstances that warrant the issuance of the additional permit.

#### (c) Permit conditions

Each such permit shall set forth the conditions under which priority shall be maintained.

#### (d) Non-transferability and cancellation of permits

Such permits shall not be transferable, and may be canceled by order of the Commission upon failure of permittees to comply with the conditions thereof or for other good cause shown after notice and opportunity for hearing.

(June 10, 1920, ch. 285, pt. I, §5, 41 Stat. 1067; renumbered pt. I and amended, Aug. 26, 1935, ch. 687, title II, §§203, 212, 49 Stat. 841, 847; Pub. L. 113–23, §5, Aug. 9, 2013, 127 Stat. 495; Pub. L. 115–270, title III, §3001(a), Oct. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 3862.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–270, §3001(a)(1), substituted "4 years" for "three years".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 115–270, §3001(a)(2), inserted dash after "The Commission may", designated remaining provisions as par. (1), substituted "4 additional years beyond the 4 years" for "2 additional years beyond the 3 years", and added par. (2).

2013—Pub. L. 113–23 designated existing first, second, and third sentences as subsecs. (a), (c), and (d), respectively, and added subsec. (b).

1935—Act Aug. 26, 1935, §203, amended section generally, striking out "and a license issued" at end of second sentence and inserting "or for other good cause shown after notice and opportunity for hearing" in last sentence.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

In the interest of S.D.S., a child, * From the County Court at Law

No. 2 of Ector County,

Trial Court No. CC2

- 3179

- PC

.

No. 11

- 13

- 00250

- CV * February 6, 2014

* Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J

. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court = s opinion, the order

of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Ex-12e

                                                     Idaho Power Company
                                             Consolidated Financial Information
                                       Supplemental Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


                                                             Twelve Months Ended December 31,
                                                                  (Thousands of Dollars)

                                                  1994         1995         1996        1997          1998
<S>                                              <C>          <C>         <C>          <C>          <C>
Earnings, as defined:
    Income before income taxes.................. $109,173     $135,333    $142,710     $138,746     $140,984
    Adjust for distributed income of equity
      investees.................................      326       (2,058)     (1,413)      (3,943)      (4,697)
    Equity in loss of equity method
      investments...............................        0            0           0            0          476
    Minority interest in losses of majority
      owned subs................................        0            0           0            0         (125)
    Supplemental fixed charges, as below........   57,849       59,992      60,939       64,317       64,051

        Total earnings, as defined.............. $167,348     $193,267    $202,236     $199,120     $200,689

Fixed charges, as defined:
    Interest charges............................  $54,433      $56,456     $57,348      $60,761      $60,677
    Rental interest factor......................      794          925         991          982          801

        Total fixed charges.....................   55,227       57,381      58,339       61,743       61,478

    Supplemental increment to fixed charges*....    2,622        2,611       2,600        2,574        2,573

        Total supplemental fixed charges........  $57,849      $59,992     $60,939      $64,317      $64,051

Supplemental ratio of earnings to fixed charges.     2.89x        3.22x      3.32x        3.10x       3.13x

* Explanation of increment:
    Interest on the guaranty of American Falls Reservoir District bonds
    and Milner Dam Inc. notes which are already included in operating expense.

Exhibit 12-E

</TABLE>
- Newsroom        - Press Releases
      - Public Statements
      - Speeches
      - Testimony
      - Spotlight Topics
      - Media Gallery
      - Upcoming Events
      - Webcasts
      - What's New
      - SEC Videos
      - Reports and Publications
      - RSS Feeds
      - Social Media 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting; Cancellation

**FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:** 85 FR 81999, December 17, 2020

**PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:** Monday, December 21, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.

**CHANGES IN THE MEETING:** The Open Meeting scheduled for Monday, December 21, 2020 at 10:00 a.m., has been cancelled.

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:** For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: December 18, 2020

Vanessa A. CountrymanSecretary
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 23





                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements Nos. 333-73197, 33-57103, 33-57105, 33-70660, 33-25947, 33-6359, and
2-83144 on Forms S-8 dated March 2, 1999, December 28, 1994, December 28, 1994,
October 21, 1993, December 7, 1988, June 29, 1986 and April 8, 1983,
respectively, of Hunt Corporation and its subsidiaries of our report dated
January 30, 2001 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.





PricewaterhouseCoopers

Philadelphia, PA 19103
March 1, 2001
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Robert
P. LoCascio, Chief Executive Officer of LivePerson, Inc. (the “Company”),
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           the
Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      May 10, 2010
                  By:
                  /s/ ROBERT
      P. LOCASCIOName:
                  Robert
      P. LoCascioTitle:
                  Chief
      Executive Officer





This
certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except
to the extent the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.
g:\blm\buttermp\ams\FinalFigures\Fig2-9_VegZones1117.mxd 

Broadwater County 

£¤12 Townsend 

Boulder 

Anaconda 

§ ̈¦90 

Deerlodge County 

287 

Butte 

£¤

Silverbow County Gallatin County

§ ̈¦15 

Whitehall 

Three Forks 

Belgrade 

Bozeman 

Madison County 

Group 1 - Subalpine Group 5 - Wetland Ripari

i t Con Non Veget ted 

an 

Vegetation Zones in the Butte Planning Area 

Butte Field Office - EIS

RMP Pl

Group 2 - Mo

0 Miles 10 Group 3 - Woodland Wat

Map Land Management (BLM) f Loca on
 ended by BLM.
 Group 4 - Shrub Grass

s ifer a

anning Area, Montana 

GURE 2-9b 

er 

No warranty is made by the Bureau of 

FI land for use o ti data for purposes not int

I
§ 1.4 Definition of Form I-94 The term *Form I-94,* as used in this chapter I, includes the collection of arrival/departure and admission or parole information by DHS, whether in paper or electronic format, which is made available to the person about whom the information has been collected, as may be prescribed by DHS. The following terms, when used in the context of the *Form I-94,* are clarified as to their meaning to accommodate the collection of such information in an electronic format. ( a ) The terms “annotate,” “note,” “indicate on,” “stamp,” and “endorse,” unless used in part 231 of this chapter, include, but are not limited, to DHS amending, including or completing information in its electronic record of admission, or arrival/departure. For purposes of part 231, the term “endorse” includes but is not limited to the submission of electronic departure data to CBP.
( b ) The terms “completed,” “completely executed” and “completed and signed” include, but are not limited to, DHS completing its collection of information into its electronic record of admission, or arrival/departure.
( c ) The terms “issuance” and “given” include, but are not limited to, the creation of an electronic record of admission, or arrival/departure by DHS following an inspection performed by an immigration officer.
( d ) The term “original I-94” includes, but is not limited to, any printout or electronic transmission of information from DHS systems containing the electronic record of admission or arrival/departure.
( e ) The terms “present,” “presentation,” or “submission” of a Form I-94, unless they are used in § 231.1 or § 231.2 of this chapter, include, but are not limited to, providing a printout of information from DHS systems containing an electronic record of admission or arrival/departure. For purposes of § 231.1 of this chapter, the terms “present” or “submission” of the Form I-94 includes ensuring that each passenger presents him/herself to a CBP Officer for inspection at a U.S. port-of-entry. For the purposes of § 231.2 of this chapter, the terms “present,” “submit,” or “submission” of the Form I-94 includes ensuring that each passenger is available for inspection by a CBP Officer upon request.
( f ) The term “possession” with respect to a Form I-94 includes, but is not limited to, obtaining a copy or printout of the record of an electronic evidence of admission or arrival/departure from the appropriate CBP systems.
( g ) The terms “surrendering,” “turning in a Form I-94,” and “departure I-94” includes, but is not limited to, complying with any departure controls under 8 CFR part 215 that may be prescribed by CBP in addition to the submission of electronic departure data to CBP by a carrier.
[78 FR 18472, Mar. 27, 2013]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 6, 2010, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), ASTM International (“ASTM”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                           ( print page 1460)                        Specifically, ASTM has provided an updated list of current, ongoing ASTM standards activities originating between September 2010 and December 2010 designated as Work Items. A complete listing of ASTM Work Items, along with a brief description of each, is available at                     *http://www.astm.org.*

                    On September 15, 2004, ASTM filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 10, 2004 (69 FR 65226).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 23, 2010. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 26, 2010 (75 FR 65657).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2011-76 Filed 1-7-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### § 395.16 Permit for the establishment of vending facilities.

Prior to the establishment of each vending facility, other than a cafeteria, the State licensing agency shall submit an application for a permit setting forth the location, the amount of space necessary for the operation of the vending facility; the type of facility and equipment, the number, location and type of vending machines and other terms and conditions desired to be included in the permit. Such application shall be submitted for the approval of the head of the Federal property managing department, agency, or instrumentality. When an application is not approved, the head of the Federal property managing department, agency, or instrumentality shall advise the State licensing agency in writing and shall indicate the reasons for the disapproval.
#### § 661.41 After a bridge project has been completed (either PE or construction) what happens with the excess or surplus funding?

Since the funding is project specific, once a bridge design or construction project has been completed under this program, any excess or surplus funding is returned to FHWA for use on additional approved TTF bridge projects.
§ 300.134 Consultation. To ensure timely and meaningful consultation, an LEA, or, if appropriate, an SEA, must consult with private school representatives and representatives of parents of parentally-placed private school children with disabilities during the design and development of special education and related services for the children regarding the following: ( a ) Child find. The child find process, including— ( 1 ) How parentally-placed private school children suspected of having a disability can participate equitably; and
( 2 ) How parents, teachers, and private school officials will be informed of the process.
( b ) *Proportionate share of funds.* The determination of the proportionate share of Federal funds available to serve parentally-placed private school children with disabilities under § 300.133(b), including the determination of how the proportionate share of those funds was calculated.
( c ) *Consultation process.* The consultation process among the LEA, private school officials, and representatives of parents of parentally-placed private school children with disabilities, including how the process will operate throughout the school year to ensure that parentally-placed children with disabilities identified through the child find process can meaningfully participate in special education and related services.
( d ) *Provision of special education and related services.* How, where, and by whom special education and related services will be provided for parentally-placed private school children with disabilities, including a discussion of— ( 1 ) The types of services, including direct services and alternate service delivery mechanisms; and
( 2 ) How special education and related services will be apportioned if funds are insufficient to serve all parentally-placed private school children; and
( 3 ) How and when those decisions will be made;
( e ) *Written explanation by LEA regarding services.* How, if the LEA disagrees with the views of the private school officials on the provision of services or the types of services (whether provided directly or through a contract), the LEA will provide to the private school officials a written explanation of the reasons why the LEA chose not to provide services directly or through a contract.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 1820-0030 and 1820-0600) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(10)(A)(iii))
#### KURTH, Respondent, v. OSBORN, Appellant.

(252 N. W. 851.)

(File No. 7560.

Opinion filed February 23, 1934.)

*Flagg P.*Carlisle, of Kadoka, and *C. F. Manson,*of White River, for Appellant.

*H. P. Gilchrist,*of Kadoka, and *Alvin Waggoner,*of Philip, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, having instituted an action against defendant in the circuit court, recovered judgment, and defendant appeals. An examination of the record fails to disclose any error on the part of the court during the trial or that the defendant has been in any wise prejudiced in his rights.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

All Judges concur.
(No. 78-CC-0701

#### Earnest Jennings, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 6, 1979.*

Polos, C.J.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that the property in question was lost while in the actual physical possession of the State of Illinois, and that the State is liable as a bailee for the return of that property.

The record herein establishes that on August 13, 1976, when he arrived at the Joliet Correctional Center, penitentiary authorities took from Claimant his toliet *772articles and cigarettes having a value of $15.43. Claimant was told that he would receive the articles shortly after processing, but the articles were never returned to him.

This Court held in *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*deciding that the State has a duty to exercise reasonable care to safeguard and return an inmate’s property when it takes actual physical possession of such property during the course of the transfer of an inmate between penal institutions.

While bailment is ordinarily a voluntary contractual transaction between bailor and bailee, various types of constructive and involuntary bailments have been recognized:

> “A constructive bailment can be created between an owner of the property and one in possession thereof.” *Chesterfield Sewer & Water, Inc., v. Citizens Insurance Co. of New Jersey, et al., 57 Ill. App.2d 90,207 NE2d 84.*

In *Chesterfield,*the Court quotes from *Woodson v. Hare, 244 Ala. 301, 13 So2d. 172, at 174,*as follows;

> “An actual contract or one implied in fact is not always necessary to create a bailment. Where, otherwise than by mutual contract of bailment, one person has lawfully acquired the possession of personal property of another and holds it under circumstances whereby he ought, upon principles of justice, to keep it safely and restore it or deliver it to the owner, such person and the owner of the property are, by operation of law, generally treated as bailee and bailor under a contract of bailment, irrespective of whether or not there has been any mutual assent, express or implied, to such relationship.”

The loss or damage to bailed property while in the possession of the bailee raises a presumption of negligence which the bailee must rebut by evidence of due care. The effect of this rule is not to shift the ultimate burden of proof from the bailor to the bailee, but simply to shift the burden of proceeding or going forward with the evidence.

At the trial of this cause the State presented no testimony to explain the disappearance of Claimant’s *773property, and presented no testimony of its freedom from negligence.

Respondent has presented no evidence to explain the disappearance of Claimant’s property, and no testimony to rebut the presumption of negligence that arises from the loss of the bailed property.

It is therefore ordered that Claimant be, and hereby is awarded the sum of $15.43.
§ 21.32 Confidentiality of information about net worth. ( a ) In a proceeding on an application, the public record ordinarily includes the information showing the net worth of the applicant.
( b ) However, if an applicant objects to public disclosure of any portion of the information and believes there are legal grounds for withholding it from disclosure, the applicant may submit directly to the adjudicative officer— ( 1 ) The information the applicant wishes withheld in a sealed envelope labeled “Confidential Financial Information;” and
( 2 ) A motion to withhold the information from public disclosure.
( c ) The motion must— ( 1 ) Describe the information the applicant is requesting be withheld; and
( 2 ) Explain in detail— ( i ) Why that information falls within one or more of the specific exemptions from mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act;
( ii ) Why public disclosure of the information would adversely affect the applicant; and
( iii ) Why disclosure is not required in the public interest.
( d ) ( 1 ) The applicant shall serve on Department's counsel a copy of the material referred to in paragraph (c) of this section.
( 2 ) The applicant is not required to give a copy of that material to any other party to the proceeding.
( e ) ( 1 ) If the adjudicative officer finds that the information should not be withheld from public disclosure, the information is placed in the public record of the proceeding.
( 2 ) If the adjudicative officer finds that the information should be withheld from public disclosure, any request to inspect or copy the information is treated in accordance with the Department's established procedures under the Freedom of Information Act (34 CFR part 5).
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 504(c)(1))