# Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Determination of Total Filterable Particulate Matter, Nitrogen Oxides, Sulfur Dioxide, Sulfuric Acid, Carbon Monoxide, Total Gaseous Nomethane Organic, Hydrochloric Acid, Hydrofluoric Acid and Visible

Emissions
Ceric Kiln EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7E, 8, 9, 10, 25, and 26A Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant

Summervillc, Pennsylvania Date Conducted: June 24 and 25, 2008 Job Number: 080609

Prepared by: 

# uompliance



# ~ Testing, Inc.

PO Box 41156 Cleveland OH 44141-0156 Phone:(800) EPA-AIR1(372-2471) 

### Report Date: July 31, 2008

### SuperiorQuality 

# Air Gompliance

Emission Testing. Valid 

## Results 

# Testing, Inc. Guaranteed. P.O. Box 41156 Cleveland, Ohio 44141 9-800-EPA-AIR1 www.aircomp.com

testing@aircomp.com 

## July 31, 2008 Mike Krzyzanowski Environmental Manager Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant 423 South Pottsville Pike Shoemakersville, Pennsylvania 19555 Dear Mike: The following report provides the results of the compliance emission testing conducted on June 24 and 25, 2008. These results are a product of the application of the U.S. EPA Stationary Source Sampling Methods listed in 40 CFR Part 60 Appendix A that were in effect at the time of this test. Please mail one copy of this report along with any other supportive process operating data colleeted during this test to your local EPA representative. You should also attach a cover letier (on company letterhead) stating the purpose and the outcome of this test. Additionally, you may address, preferably in a timetable fonnat, any obligations or implications that might be necessary to achieve environmental compliance because of the result of this test. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions or concerns about these test results. On behalf of Air Compliance Testing, I would also like to personally thank you for the opportunity to work with you on this testing project and would enjoy the opportunity to work with you again on any additional future testing projects. Sincerely, 

# / / _o 

# ~~ Phaneendra Uppalapati Air Quality Engineer

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation

- Hanley Plant 

# Table of Contents Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 Summary of Test Program 2 1.2 Key Personnel 2 2.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS 3 2.1 Objectives and Test Matrix 3 2.2 Field Test Changes and Problems 3 2.3 Presentation of Results 4 3.0 PLANT AND SAMPLING LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS 15 3.1 Process Description and Operation 15 3.2 Control Equipment Description 15 3.3 Flue Gas Sampling Locations 15 3.4 Process Sarnpling Location 16 4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 20 4.1 Test Methods 20 4.2 Procedures for Obtaining Process Data 22 5.0 INTERNAL QA/QC ACTIVITIES 27 5.1 QA Audits 27 5.2 QA/QC Problems 28 6.0 APPENDIX 40

Test Date: June 24 

## and 25, 2008 Page 1 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc, - 080609

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation

- 

### Hanlev Plant

I 

### ' f 9 

### ' • f 

## 1.1 Summary of Test Program Glen-gery Corporation - Hanley Plant, located in Summerville, Pennsylvania eontracted Air Compliance Testing, Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio to conduct compliance stack emissions testing for their Ceric Kiln (Source ID; 113). Testing was performed to satisfy the emission testing requirements pursuant to Glen-Gery Corporation's Pennsylvania DEP Title V permit. The testing was performed on June 24 and 25, 2008.. The testing was performed on June 24 and 25, 2008. Sampling was performed at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack to determine the mass emission rate of total filterable parCiculate matter (PM), sulfur dioxide (SO z ), sulfuric acid mist (H 2 SO 4 ), hydrochloric acid (HCI), and hydrofluoric acid (HF). Sampling was also performed at the Ceric Kiln Wet Scrubber Exhaust Stack to determine the mass emission rate of nitrogen oxides (NO x ) ( 

## as NO 2 ), carbon monoxide (CO), and total gaseous nonmethane organics (TGNMOs). Testing was conducted while operating at a maximum production level for the product S32. During this test, emissions from Ceric Kiln were controlled by a wet scrubber. Visible Emissions (VEs) measured as percent opacity were also monitored at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack to deterinine the maximum six-minute average of opacity. The test methods that were eonducted during this test were EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7E, 8, 9, 10, 25, and 26A.
1.2 Key Personnel The key personnel who coordinated this test program (and their phone numbers) were: Mike Krzyzanowski, Environmental Manager, Glen-Gery Corporation, 610-562-3076 John Guth, Air Quality Program Manager, PA DEP - Northwest District Office, 814-332-6940 Philip J. Billick, President, Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 800-372-2471 Sin Hoi Chiew, Project Manager, Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 800-372-2471

Test Date: June 24 

## and 25, 2008 Page 2 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609

## Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation

- 

### Hanlev Plant


## 2.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS 2.1 Objectives and Test Matrix 

## The purpose of this test was to detennine the mass emission rate of total filterable PM, S0 2 , H2SO4, HCI, and HF at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack and also determine the mass emission rate of NO, (as NO2), CO, and TGNMOs at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maxirnum production levels for the product S32. VEs (measured as %-opacity) were also determined at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. Testing was performed to satisfy the emission testing requirements pursuant to Glen-Gery Corporation's Pennsylvania DEP Title V permit. The specific test objectives for this test were to• 

## Measure the concentration of total filterable PM, SO Z , H 2 SO 4 , HCI, and I-IF at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Staek and also measure the concentration of NO x , CO, and TGNMOs at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. Measure the dry standard and actual volumetric flow rate of the stack gas at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. Utilize the above variables to deterinine the mass ernission rate of total filterable PM, S0 2 , H 2 SO 4 , HCI, and HF at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack and also determine the mass emission rate of NO x (as NO 2 ), CO, and TGNMOs at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. Determine the maximum six-minute average of opacity at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. Tables 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 presents the sampling and ana1ytical matrix log for this test. 2.2 Field Test Changes and Problems 

## The intermediate sainpling train leak check performed during Run I at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct yielded a leakage rate which was greater than the allowable leakage rate of 0.020 cfm. Therefore, Run 1 was voided and three additional runs (Runs 2-4) were performed at both the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack. Results from Run 1 are not included in this test report.

Test Date: June 24 

## and 25, 2008 Page 3 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanlev Plant



### 2.3 Presentation of Results 

## Two (2) sampling trains were utilized during each run to detennine the ma'ss emission rate of total filterable PM, SO Z , H 2 SO 4 , HCI, and HF at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. One sampling train measured the stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and concentration of total filterable PM, HCI, and IIF and a second eampling train measured the stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and concentration of SO Z and H 2 SO 4

. Three (3) sampling trains were utilized during each run to determine the mass emission rate of total filterable PM, SO Z , H 2 SO 4 , HCI, HF, NO, (as NO 2 ), CO, and TGNMOs at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. One sampling train measured the stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and concentration of total filterable PM, HCI, and HF and a second sampling train measured the stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and concentration of SO Z and H 2 SO 4 . A third sampling train was utilized to measure the stack gas concentration of NO x , CO, and TGNMOs. Table 2.2.1 displays the mass emission rate of total filterable PM, HCI, and HF measured at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack and the mass emission rate of NO x (as NO Z ), CO, and TGNMOs at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. Table 2.2.1 also displays the maximum 6-minute average of opacity measured at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximurn production levels for the product S32. Table 2.2.2 displays the mass emission rate of S0 2 and H 2 SO 4 at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct and at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. The mass emission rate displayed in Tables 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack utilize the saturated moisture content values determined for the given stack gas temperatures and pressures as per Section 4.0, of EPA Method 4. The measured flue gas percent by volume moisture contents were higKer than the calculated saturated values which is indicative of the presence of entrained moisture droplets in the stack gas. 

## The concentration of TGNMOs measured during Runs 1 and 3 at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack were reported to be below the accepted EPA Method 25 Minimum Detection Limit (MDL) of 50 ppmvd. The accepted MDL is approximately 10-times the analytical laboratory Level of Quantification (LOQ) of 5 ppmvd. Concentration values in Tables 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 denoted with a'

~ 

## ' were measured to be below the minimum detection limit (MDL) of the applicable analytical method. Mass emission rates denoted with a'<' in Tables 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 were calculated utilizing the applicable MDL concentration value instead of the "as measured" concentration value.

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 4 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanley Plant



## The graphs that follow Table 2.2.2 present the raw, uncorrected concentration data measured in the field by the EPA Method 7E and 10 sampling systems at the Cerie Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Staek. Tables 2.3.1 - 2.33 display the measured results for the VE readings performed at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack while operating at maximum production levels for the product S32. The minimum, maximum, and maximum six-minute average opacity readings are displayed for each run.

Test Date: June 24 

## and 25, 2008 Page 5 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609W v ❑ O ~ y M i ~

m '1 ~ v m l M
U M O'

o V1 O ~ CO O~ N y V N d <Y

~ A

M N M 

# H E = o ri 'n y A 

# E e rn v rn

E p o ri vi y A

~ a rn a rn 0 0 rv 0

M H N

_ i~

~

Ma

h

/w

_ M rn'n rn rn m m m rn m rn O. iV

,~ V ❑ O~ m M Q~ M M

N C C N d V y 

# E ❑ rn M M a. c'm rm

E ❑ N 'n rn N

~ ., rn

~ A 

# a rPi N

S N

S N

~ V ' ❑ V y ❑

❑ A Q A ~ ~ q C q C C F
N N r/ ❑ i ' 

## ~ U V '~ N

V V V 

# V U V ❑

u 0 0

O oa

0 O m

0 O oo

0 w

0 N N N A 

# N N N N N N t

q C N ti U N E 

# U

~ Q

sa

~

.. .~

C

C OD C

. 

### ~ 

### E

~ rl N m a
~ d a



### E

~ E

~ 

### E M. O N 

## ° c c N

~ d O N F~ 

### 0
~ 

### 0
~ 0 

## a ~

~
~
~

~ 

# m E U L Q


# L

~

~ H 

# H

.~ n d

~

~ 

### bA q 

# .~

~ ~ 

### N 

## .-i N

~ ~
~ M



# N a

!


### E F s m Q

~ d

W O
~ O N E Ld N

~ 

### a ~ ~ 

## N N C
~ ~ 

## N N
~ N 

## N

~ 

# o ~ _

M N M M N M



# w d , ~ ', O

~ C

~ A ~ 

# 3 H •~ ~; LO d ~ d; V 

## ~ o

C M N M M N M

~ rA A w ~ 

# v

Cj A d ~ ~ 0 V .L1 U



### U 

# ~ ~ ~ ~ y~

~ " / Vl ~

~ C /
. V)

~ ~ Fr4 ~ IY .S' y 

### V V V 

### V V V C



## O O O N O O O A 

## N N N N N N

# a

_ e

V

~ 

# ~



# m

~

E U ¢

$

~



### ~

Y IX

~ 3

~ z 5 ~

€

~ 5 

### V 8 ~

~ 

# a a

~ ~ S 4 ~ ~ !J

7

~ a 0

V N

° o

~ 

# a hi
N
n F N~ O V h

~ V -° p~ O O O~ P O N -_ ~ N O(V
~ • N b N °' V V V A y

y A V v V A V v V

° 

# a_ y C P O O vi n ~ ` O c M_ ~~D O O P " A v v y/~ v V - d V

i C ~ • ' M O n N

~~ o ~ N N_

~~ ` p ~ N.• 1 ~ o O P V V A V V V I~ y



### 0
y y N ° O O V

~ • O o O `D N (L O V V 

# V

a O V V

• `~ 3 g O E ~ SS p U

"d ~ ~ p Z r~i~ 3 ~ ~ ~/ '~ >

~ II f 5 a`

¢ A

E w G $ S E U F ri

~~

M ~

h ~ R 

# ~ V1 

### N 00 

### N O 

### N ll W M

m ~ L M A a 00 00 M 00 00 O l ~ M h d' Vl ~ M O O

^; M

• L ~

M

N

' J

. Q W

. d Q h X
d h M


### a L

~ W

W V .~ 

### v 

# U ~

~ N



### 0
~



## s

° 0 a

~

E ?~


### ~ a [ i



### ~

~ 

### °'

.~ 

### °'

a~ 

## i Cj O o•

::

~
~ ~' a 

### G i

~ v

~

. 9 n 

# ::

.~ W 

## v,

` ~ ~ 

### .3

v 

## V O

~ 

### e~



## w
6

~

` •'G 

### a~


## k+
Q

` ~ .`L 

# A
~

u ^° 

## ,

0 6 

### .~ 

# `

°o

` ~ 

## (7

.~ I

. 

### 5

o ° ~ 

## • ° ro Q 

## r 'Ti ` 

## ` a ' ~



## (=
4 2

•' ' ~ 

### x



## o

? 

### ~' 

### ~

~

a~i

~ 

### o

Q

`So •C v~i 

### q

r~n C 

### ~

ri~ C

~ 

### N C ? ~ 

### U T 

### .O a a Cv 

### U a m 0 ~ O
C

~ C .~

~ 

### U m 

### Q 

# O U \ Q

~

W 

## O

. r

. 0 

### W G



### ~ 

### O
~

~ P @

, 

### W N N N v ~ ~ F 

## m m a

0 N 

### N C

~ 

### @ d V b N w @

~ N ~ 

### O N
N ~ v~ N 

### x ~Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanley Plant



# Ceric Kiln Wet Scrubber Exhaust Stack NO x Concentration
40 

### 36 --- --- ------------- _ _---------------------------------__ __ --..__.....- ---------------------------- _ --------- ------ 32 -------- --...._-.... ---- ------------------ ----- ----_..-......._.._..-..------------- --- ---------------- ------------------ -- 28 ° 24 ..__----

------------- --- ---------------------- .......-------------- ____ --- ------------ --- ---------- ----- ----- --------- -----_-- -- ------- ----- --------------------------

_ ------- ----- --------------------------- - ----- -- --------------- - ---- E20 Q- 

### a 16 ........... .....--------------- -- ---------.-....---- --------------------- - ------ ------ - --- .......--------------------------

--- _------- ----- --- -------------------------------- -------- -- - ------------------------------ --------- __..... ------ --- ._... 12 ........ -- -- - --- - ---- ---. ---------"'. ----- — 8 --- --- - - ---------------------- -- - - . .............--- --- ------- -- --
------- ------ ------- ---- --------........_..._,..___. q 0 O ,y'1 0 ,~~ O ,~ 

### '1 O „~ 

### 0 O p, `L O p,O Ok

0 Oy ~ O ~ 

### G Oy '1

~~ 

### O ^ ,y' ~ ^ ~ 

### yR

~ 

### , ti 1 ^3 0 n , y `L ^g `o ^3 0 ^ p,^ ^p

k ^ p'1 '~~ ' y ~ * ~~ ,
~ 

# ^ , y n'

~ 

# ^' y n'

~ 

# ^ '

~ 

# ^'

~ 

# ^'

~ 

# ^ - y ^' y n' y n

~ 

# n' y ^

~ 

# n

~ 

# ^ y ^ y ^

~ 

# ^ 6 \L 6 \`L 6 \L



## Ceric Kiln Wet Scrubber Exhaust Stack NO X Concentration 40 

### 36 ...- -------------- ------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- -- ---- ------------- - 32 -- --------- -- -- - --------- -- --- ------------- ---------.....------------------------------------------------------------------------- 28 V 

### 24 --------- --------

------------------------------------------------ .-.... ---------------------------------- -------------- ------------ ----- ....----- ----------------------------------..-------------------------------- --- ------------------------.-...----- - 

## E 20 a 16 a 

### -- ------------------ ---------- ---------....--------------------------------- -_-.-...--------._..-..-------.....-- --------- ...-..----

-- ............._--------- - ---..-..-.. _..--- -------------------------------------------- - ----- -- 12 - -- - ------ - - - - - --- --- __ -------... _-...---T........_ 8 - - ------------------ ------------------------_ __.-...- ....---------......--------- _ ---..__ _- - 4 

### -- -....-----------..,-----------'------

~ 

### ---._------------------- ------------------------------'--_.-..-. 0 (~ 

### V M1^ ^' ~ 

### "'\ a ~ 

### A.3 ~~ ~~J ( V (7'J A

~ 

### ^N A

~ ^\ 1

~~ (~~ A~ /~ nJ 1.

~ (~V A

~ (~~J "JV ",` ✓ !~v ~^ 

# ^ 3 ' V N n ~ 

# ' J N n b' 

# ^ r

~ 

# ' ^ r

~ 

# ' ~(~' ~(~ 

### ' ^ N'Y (

~ 

### ^ N'V ^ N'V /

~ 

### ^ N'V !

~ ~~ `'

~~ `' '

~~ `'

~ ~ t `' !

~ ^ (
~ • ' J

~ ^ (
~ ' !

~ ~ N ~ ! ~ N'

`



# _ ^ r ~ 

# ' N ! \`~<'' \`~~ \`~~ \`~~ \`~~ \ `
~ •J \ `
~ `J \!~~ \

`
~ 'J \ `
~ 'J \ `
~ 'J \ `
~ 'J \`~~ \

! ~ 'J \`~~ \

`
~ 'J \~ ' J 

### \ `

~ <'J 

### \ `

~ `J \ 1 ' •J

~ 

### '0 0 6 6 6 0 6 0 6 0 0 6 6 C
~ 

### 6 0 0 6 6 0


# Ceric Kiln Wet Scrubber Exhaust Stack NO X Concentration
40 

### 36 -- _ ---------- --- ------- -----------------..-......-...----...----------------------------------------------------------------- 32 -------- -- --- --.._._._..-- --------------------- --- -- ---- - ................_...... _-. 28 y 24 _ ... --- --- .... ------------------------- ._... - -..._------ ----------- -- ---------------------- --- ...--- - ---
._.. ------- -.._.__...

--- ------------- -- -------------"--- -- -- --'------ - ...........-.-....-.. -- ._..... .--......... E 20 Q 

### 16 G 

### _.._-- ------- ------------------- ...._.....- --- ...-------------------- ------------- -- --------- ---------- ----- ----------- --

.-,._. ....--.._.....- ---.,. - ---- - ----------------- - ------ -------- _ ---------------- 12 ----------- ------ -........... __------- ----- - - .-...- _.... - 8 - --------.......---- --------- -------.....-------------- ---------------------------------------- -- __....----------------- q 

### --- -----------,_.,-------

~~ 

### --__- ._........--------------- -- -------

~ 

### --...._,.,._._-

~ 

### ----.._- _...._._.-

~ 

### -------

~~ 

### - 0 0P b '1 00 O"~ ,~N (L g ` 3 

### `Y `yh "

~~ b p,~ p , p ,

~ ~j~ 

### h 5`'

° 

### ^ y. ^ 5. ^

~ 

### . ^ y' ^6 ' ^6

. ^`°' ^6

. ^6

. ^

~ 

### ' ^`°. ^`°. ^

~ 

### . ^`°. ^`°. ^

~ 

### . ^6

. \ti

~ ' 

### \ti

~ ' 

### \I y \ 1

~ ' 

### \ti ~ \~~ \ti~ \ti~ \ti y 

### \ti ~ 

### \ti ~ 

### \ti ~ 

### \ti y \ti ~ \ 1 ~ 

### \ti

y 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 6 6 6



### Test Date: June 25, 2008 Page 10 Air Compliance Tesfing, lnc. 

### - 080609CL

CL



### Test Date: June 25, 2008 page11 

### AirConpliancoTestin8k/u 'O0000Comoliance Stack Emisslon Test Reoort GIen-Gerv Corporation - Hanlev Plant



# _
StartTime End Time 12:23 13:23 Max 6 min ayerage

Minimum Reatlinq Maximum Reading 

# _ 6.46 0 10.00

Sec.1 0 

### 1 15 30 

### 1 45 Six roinute aveta es: Min. 0 5

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

5 5 0 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 4.58

4.58 4.58 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.21 5.21 5.21 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.79 4.79 4.58 4.79 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.38 4.58 4.58 5.42 5.42 5.63 5.83 5.83 5.83 5.63 6.04 6.04 6.04 6.04 6.25 6.04 5.63 5.42 5.63 5.63 511 5,00 5.00 5D0 4.58

4.58 4.58 4,79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.21 5.21 5.21 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.5B 4.58 4.58 4.79 4.79 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.38 4.58 4.79 5.42 5.63 5.63 5.83 5.83 5.83 5.83 5.83 6.04 6.04 6.04 6.46 5.83 5.63 5.63 5.63 5.63 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.58

4.58 4.58 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.21 511 5.21 5.21 5.00 5.00 4.79 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.79 4.79 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.38 4.58 5.00 5.42 5.63 5.63 5.83 5.83 5.83 6.04 5.83 6.04 6.04 6.04 6.25 5.63 5.63 5.63 5.63 5.63 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.58

4.58 4.79 5.00 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.21 5.21 5.21 5.21 5.00 5.00 4.5B 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.38 4.58 5.21 5.42 5.63 5.63 5.83 5.83 5.83 6.04 5.83 6.04 6.04 6.04 6.04 5.63 5.63 5.63 5.63 5.42 5.00 5.00 5.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59

Table 2.3.1 - Visible Emissions

Test Date: June 24 entl 25, 2008 Pe9e 12 Alr Compliance 7esting, Inc. - 080609Compl'ance Stack Emission Test Repon Glen-Gerv CorporatVon - Hanlev Plant

StartTime End Time 15:45 16:45 Max 6 min avereg e

Minimum Reading Maximum Reatling 

# _ 4.58 0 5.00

Sec. 

### 1 0 15 30 

### 1 45 Sic minute avera es: Min. 0 5

0 5 5 0 5 5 5 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 5 5 0 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 0 5 0 5 5 0 5 5

5 0 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 0 0 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 0 5 0 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

5 0 5 5 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 0 5 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 3.13

2.71 2.92 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.71 3.13 3.13 3.33 3,54 175 3.54 3.33 3.33 3.75 3.75 3.96 4.17 4.17 4.38 4.t7 4.38 4.17 3.98 4.17 3.75 3.75 3.54 3.75 3.96 3.96 4.17 4.38 4.38 438 4.38 4.17 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.58 4.38 4.17 4.38 4.17 4.17 4.17 4,17 4.17 4.17 4,17 4.17 3.13

2.92 2.71 2.29 2.50 2.50 2.71 2.92 113 3.54 3.75 3.54 3.54 3.33 3.54 3.75 3.75 4.17 4.17 4.38 4.17 4.17 4.38 3.96 3.96 3.96 3.96 3.54 3.54 3.75 3.96 4,17 4.17 4.38 4.38 4.5B 4.38 4.17 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 3.96 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 3.96 4.38 3.13

2.92 2.92 2.29 2.29 2.50 2.71 2.92 3.13 3.54 3.75 3.75 3.54 3.33 3.54 3.54 3.96 3.96 4.17 4.38 417 4.38 4.17 4.17 3.96 3.96 3.75 3.54 3.75 3.75 3.96 4.17 4.38 438 4.38 4.58 4.17 4.17 4.3B 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.58 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.17 3.96 4.t7 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.38 2.92

2.71 2.71 2.29 2.50 2.71 2.92 3.13 3,33 3.54 3.75 3.54 3.54 3.33 3.54 3.75 3.96 4.17 4.17 4.38 4.17 4.38 4,17 3.96 3.96 3.96 3.75 3.54 3.75 3.96 3.96 3.96 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.58 4.17 4,38 438 4,38 4.38 4.17 4.58 4.3B 4.17 4.38 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59

Table 2.3.2 - Visible Emissions

Test Date: June 24 antl 25, 2008 Page 13 Alr Compliance Testing, Irtc. - 080609Compi'ance Slack Emission Test Repon GI®n-Gerv Corporation - Hanlev Piant

StertTime End Time 18:10 19:10 Mm( 6 min aVemqe

Minimum Reading Maximum Readln 5.00 0 a00

Sec.1 0 

### 1 15 

### 1 30 

### 1 45 Slx minute avera es: Min. 0 5

5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

0 5 5 5 0 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 0 5

5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3.96

4.17 4.17 3.96 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.38 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.58 4,58 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.58 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.79 5.00 5.00 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 5.00 4.79 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.38 4.58 4.79 4.79 4.79 3.96

4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 3.96 4.17 4.17 4.38 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.58 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.58 4.58 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 5.00 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 5.00 4.79 4.58 4.58 458 4.58 4.38 4.58 4.79 4.79 196

4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.38 4.38 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.58 4.56 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.56 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 5.00 4.58 4.56 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.38 4.58 4.58 4.79 4.79 4.17

4.17 4.17 417 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.38 4.38 4.38 4.58 4.58 4.38 4.38 438 4.58 4.58 4.56 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.58 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 5.00 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.58 5.00 5.00 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 4.79 5.00 4.79 4.79 4.58 4.58 4.58 4.38 4.58 4.58 4.79 4.79 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59

Table 2.3.3 - Visible Emissions

Test Date: June 24 antl 25, 2008 Page 14 A(r Compllance Tesfing, lnc. - 080609

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Haniey Piant



## 3.0 PLANT AND SAMPLING LOCATION DE3CRIPTIONS 3.1 Process Description and Operation 

## Glen-Gery Corporation manufactures a wide range of brick products. The Hanley, Pennsylvania facility operats the Ceric Kiln which has a permitted capacity of 16.00 ton/hr. Ceric Kiln was in operation during the performance of this test event. Figure 3.1 depicts the process schematic.
3.2 Contro/ Equipment Description 

## During this test, emissions from Ceric Kiln were controlled by a wet scrubber.

3.3 Flue Gas Sampling Locations



## 3 3 1 Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duet The Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct was elliptical in shape with measured inner diameters of 41.7-inches and 41.8-inches. The stack was oriented in the horizontial plane and was accessed from a permanent platform arrangement. Two (2) 3.0-inch I.D. sampling ports were located 90° apart from one another at a location that met EPA Method 1, Section 11.1.1 criteria. Prior to emissions sampling, the stack was traversed to verify the absence of cyclonic flow. An average yaw angle of 4.34° was measured. Therefore, the sampling location also met EPA Method 1, Section 11.4.2 criteria. During emissions sampling, the stack was traversed for stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and total filterable PM, S0 2 , H 2 SO 4 , HCl and HF concentration determination.
33.2 Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack The Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack was elliptical in shape with measured inner diameters of 33.0-inches and 33.8-inches. The stack was oriented in the vertical plane and was accessed from a manlift. Two (2) 3.0- inch I.D. sampling ports were located 90° apart from one another at a location that met EPA Method 1, Section 11.1.1 criteria. Prior to emissions sampling, the stack was traversed to verify the absence of cyclonic flow. An average yaw angle of 4.67° was measured. Therefore, the sampling location also met EPA Method l, Section 11.4.2 criteria. During emissions sampling, the stack was traversed for stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and total filterable PM, SO z , H 2 SO 4

, 

## HCl and HF concentration deterinination. The stack was also traversed for stack gas NO x and CO concentration determination. A single point loeated in an area of average velocity was utilized to determine the concentration of TGMNOs.
Figures 3.2 and 3.3 schematically illustrate the traverse point and sample port locations utilized.

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 15 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanley Plant



## 3.4 Process Sampling 

## Locafion
The EPA Reference Test Methods per£ormed did not specifically require that proeess sainples were to be taken during the performance o£ this testing event. It is in the best know1edge of Air Compliance Testing that no process samples were obtained and therefore no process sampling location was identified in this report. See Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant personnel for any process sampling locations which may have been utilized unknowingly to Air Compliance Testing, Inc. during this testing event.

Test Date: June 24 

## and 25, 2008 

## Page 16 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609

### aiaydsowyy 7

LL ~ ~ o 

### o y vj m o


### a W fV ~ E

~ m y 

## u

~ Y 

## ~

~ h

~ U 

### O i.

~ G ..i 

## ~ U .~ d 

# U

~ ti 

## ri
0 

# eu 

# w M,

d 

# a ~ 0
~ 0
~ 0 6) C C1j C i: 

### y ti v u c m
. Q E 0 U
~ ~o

~ 0 0 N Ld N

~ C N V N N C
~ ~ N N
~ y N H~ 

### U

N W ( ~ ~ U 

# x ~ ~ a .= w v.



# I E m d ~ m R c m > 3 °

M d E 

### p N

~ 

### O '- IL

~ 

# U? p

y ~ 

### N o c


### e~ o •,c, 

### U ? ~ O C va
O ~ 

### t a m
~

~ 0 O 

### e

C O a
N C o 00' O) C cli d ~ m


### E J 

# Lm ~ .p CK i. 

# A a O 'w+ 4~ V a F.7



### . O Qi

~

~ d 7 fe H w V .^7 

### A ti 

# H Fn V

~ ~.Q

~ F.i V ~

~

~ r V ' V 1 N 

### M V i.

~ 

### bA .ti 

# w 0)

0 ~ 0
~ 0

~ C dl G w d
~ 

# u c 

# m ii. S 0 

### U

~ 

### . Q

W 

# a

P

~ 0 0 N Ld N

~ C N a N N C

~ -~ N 

# m

~ 

### N N 

### H W U~ C ~ ~ N « m 

### R p,-2

N ~ h 

# ~ E

~ O ! 9 tL 0 

# ~ N 

### N M M ~

M ~ V V h O



### N M V

N M V N c0



### 'O aCompliance Stack Emission Test Repo t Gten-Gery Corporation - Haniey Plant



# n 300"

8.88 Equivalent Diameters Upstream from Disturbance Port 1

(2) 3.0" I.D.

~ - Sampiing Porfs Located 90°Apart 

# r -33.8" LD.- - - - - - - - - I

d

72 „ 2.13 Equivalent Diameters Downstream from Disturbance 

# V

33.8" x 33.0" LD.

Elliptical Stack Port 2
Distance From Distance From Inside Wall (in.) inside Wail (in.) Point % of Duct Depth Port 1 Port 2 1 2.1 1.0 1A 2 6.7 2.3 2.2 3 11.8 4.0 3.9 4 17.7 6.0 5.8 5 25.0 8.5 8.3 6 35.6 12.0 11.7 7 64.4 21.8 21.3 8 75.0 25.4 24.8 9 82.3 27.8 27.2 10 88.2 29.8 291 11 93.3 31.5 30.8 12 97.9 32.8 32.0


## Figure 3.3 - Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Location Drawing

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 19 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation

- Hanlev Plant


# 4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
4.1 Test Methods 

## 4.1.1 EPA Method 1: Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Source Principle: To aid in the representative measurement of pollutant emissions and/or total volumetric flow rate from a stationary source, a measurement site where the effluent stream is flowing ' tn a known direction is selected, and the cross-section of the stack is divided into a number of equal areas. A traverse point is then located within each of these equa) areas. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 4.1.2 EPA Method 2: Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate (Type S) Principle: The average gas velocity in a stack is determined from the gas density and from measurement of the average velocity head with a Type S(Stausscheibe or reverse type) pitot tube. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 4.1.3 EPA Method 3: Gas Analysis for the Determination of Dry Molecular Weight Principle: A gas sample is extracted from a stack by one ofthe following methods: (1) single-point, grab sampling; (2) single-point, integrated sampling; or (3) multi-point, integrated sampling. The gas satnple is analyzed for percent CO Z
, 

## percent 0 2 , and if necessary, for percent CO. For dry molecular weight determination a Fyrite analyzer will be used for the analysis. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 4.1.4 EPA Method 4: Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases Principle: A gas satnple is extracted at a constant rate from the source; moisture is removed from the sample streatn and determined either volumetrically or gravimetrically. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 4.1.5 EPA Method 5: Determination of Particulate Emissions from Stationary Sources (Front-Half PM only) Principle: Particulate matter (PM) is withdrawn isokinetically fi•om the source and collected on a glass fiber filter maintained at a temperature in the range of 120 t 14°C (248 f 

## 25°F) or such other temperature as specified by an applicable subpart of the standards or approved by the Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, for a particular application. The PM mass, which includes any material that condenses at or above the filtration temperature, is determined gravimetrically after removal of uncombined water. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the proeedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 4.1.6 EPA Method 7E: Determination of Nitrogen Oxides Emissions from Stationary Sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure) (Concentrations assumed less than 2,000ppm) Principle: A sample is continuously extracted from the effluent stream; a portion of the sample stream is conveyed to an instrumental chemiluminescent analyzer for determination of NO, ; concentration. Performance specifications and test procedures are provided to ensure reliable data. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A.

Test Date: June 24 

## and 25, 2008 Page 20 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Gien-Gerv Corporation

- Hanley Plant



## 4.1.7 EPA Method 8: Detennination of Sulfuric Acid Mist and Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Stationary Sources Principle: A gas sample is extracted isokinetically from the stack. The sulfuric acid mist (including sulfur trioxide) and the sulfur dioxide are separated, and both fractions are measured separately by the barium-thorin titration method. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 4.1.8 EPA Method 9: Visual Determination of the Opacity of Emissions from Stationary Sources Principle: The opacity of emissions from stationary sources is detennined visually by a qualified observer. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A.
4.1.9 EPA Method 10: Determination of Carbon Mono x ide Emissions from Stationary Sources (Coneentrations assumed less than 10,000 ppm) Principle; An integrated or continuous gas sample is e x tracted from a sampling point and analyzed for carbon monoxide (CO) content using a Luft-type nondispersive infrared analyzer (NDIR) or equivalent. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 4.1.10 EPA Method 25: Determination of Total Gaseous Nonmethane Organic Emissions as Carbon (assamed concentration of organies will be less than 1,000,000 pprn as earbon, and that there will be no chlorinated organic compounds in the stack gas) Principle: An emission sainple is withdrawn from the stack at a constant rate through a heated filter and a chilled condensate trap by means of an evacuated sample tank. After sampling is completed, the TGNMO are determined by independently analyzing the condensate trap and sainple tank fractions and combining the analytical results. The organic content of the eondensate trap fraction is detennined by oxidizing the NMO to CO Z and quantitatively collecting it in the effluent in an evacuated vessel; then a portion of the CO 2 is reduced to CH 4 and measured by an FID. The organic content of the sample tank fraction is measured by injecting a portion of the sainple into a gas chromatographic column to separate the NMO from carbon monoxide (CO), CO Z , and CH 4 ; the NMO are oxidized to CO 2 , reduced to CH 4 , and measured by an FID. In this manner, the variable response of the FID associated with different types of organics is eliminated. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 4.1.11 EPA Method 26A: Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions from Stationary Sources-Isokinetic Method Principle: This metliod is applicable for determining emissions of hydrogen halides (HX) [hydrogen chloride (HCI), hydrogen bromide (HBr), and hydrogen fluoride (HF)] and halogens (X Z ) [ 

## chlorine (Cl z ) and bromine (Br Z )] from stationary sources. This method collects the emission sample isokinetically and is therefore particularly suited for sampling at sources, such ae those controlled by wet serubbers, emitting acid particulate matter (e.g., hydrogen halides dissolved in water droplets). This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. The sampling trains utilized during thie testing project are depicted in Figures 4.1 - 4.4.

Test Date: June 24 

## and 25, 2008 Page 21 

### AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanley Plant

4.2 Procedures for Obtaining Process Data 

## Process data was recorded by Glen-Gery Corporation - Hanley Plant personnel utilizing their typical record keeping procedures. Recorded process data was provided to Air Compliance Testing, Inc. personnel at the conclusion of this test event. The process data is located in Tables 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 and in the Appendix.

Test Date: June 24 

## and 25, 2008 Page 22 

### Air 

### Compliance Testing, Inc. 

## - 080609

### w J 

# p Uj Z U 

# U> ° h r2 

## w \

O Q~ Z

F O K 

## co ( w J

~ 

# Z a °

M w w 2

~ 

## _I a o



### ~ 

# w o W w ~ J J ~ 

## W ° w 2

~ 

# w Q J >

0 0

♦ .



# _ ~ ` Elm►



### .. 0 

### .`



# , a O 

# a

o N a w t w -Ow m 

# Za 

# Y
U ~ 

# Ft

F Q Q > 

### J N 

# ~ >

~ 

### O 2 d' \~,~ 

### w W ~ 

### (n Z 

### F



# W a.m
a~ 

## cn r= ww

a r 

# gw m 

## ~ ~

~ 

### 0 

# a a LU ¢ 

### rn 

## 0 0 0 

## W 0

~ 

### ~ 

# = w O 

### a F 2 

### ~ C LLJ

L'i 

### J

~ 

### p 

## 2 d 

## a

y 

## 0= ~ W h~ F~ UQ Z 

## O 

# >°

~ 

# ¢ `

~ 

# ¢

~



# o



# ~ 1~ ~

U w ` 

# N o j ~ 

# U Q m Q Q ~ 

## y

~ ~ m y 

## ~

~ 

## U m / ~ 

## oo W ~ L ? ~ 

## 0 ~ Eo~ O 

## ~ C



## ~ E ~ 

## -o W ~ ~ EZO O ~~ 4

- 0 ~~ s ~ ~ ~ 

## v w d 7p

~ 

### ~ N Q 

### N

ro ~

~ 

### @ 4- 

### oZO" 

## ~ a m y O



# a ~ ° inn o

~ ~ ~ 

## p~ w 

# w W Q ° F-

w ,

~ ~ 

## w z L 

# 0 0 ~ ~
a 

## z 

# Q W 

# ~

W O O 

## N N 

### ~ 

### ro 

## N C ~ ~ ~ m 0 

## N N H

### j 

### r

O UJ Z



## z < LU 

### m >- ui
LU

IL Of ui ui af 

## UJ ui ui (1) 2 co z LU >- ci of < z 2 0 ui 

## Z Z UJ 0 0:) Z 0 LU 0

UJ

~ UJ -i C) ui LL w < 

### (D 

## z a. ui 1-- 

### LU 2 0


### LU M:

cl -"~ LLJ < w w w < a: Lli co 0

LU
0

(D 

# ~ A z EL 15; 

## (f) LUF

## I 

# N

O ,

Lu

>

m

Ss 01:

A-006 E 0 0 U)

m -T E 

### LU

a. 0 E9 

### Lij

w

LL 0

w w I-- LU :E 0 z

0 O ~ - W w E 

## > W W CL 

# W.A ui

LLJ IL ui 1— UJ

< > ui 

### L z > < 

## M (L >

cl

16.



### Lu LLJ

<



## ui

# w J 4. ' w w > x N ~ 

# O J W 0 

# Z¢ J ~ 

# S QZ a 

# NK r 

# ¢o 

# zo a O 

### Q U

} j J ~ O J LL

~ ~ 

# a

~ 

# o mz w~ W J _ 

# ° y az

¢ ~ 

# w

~ ~ 

# J

§ ui 

### J 0



### ~ ~ Z_ ~ ~ O J¢

- 

### ~ ~O 

### wJ 

## ~ _~ 

### U 

# Z o }Z a 

# m 0 ~ 

# U 

# M

H ~ 

# w o J 

### a ~ ~ ,.,,.,"""..-,-►



# » w ~O~



# ~ 

# wm N N d
~ 

### a



### z O



### ~ mw 

### ¢~ 

# Uj 

# 0 W 

### w 

## o z 

# ~ J a 

# xQ \ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ a

~ 

### ~ 

# C
~ u

~ 

# E U L Q 

### c 

# C

, C

` c 

# I U 

# :

Q U z O Q
~ m

~ ! Q 

# U

W



# Wm V `o 

# ¢m O c 

# U W w

~ O
~ 

### (nI -~ 1a- ~J 

# x C 

# - ? u J- ,o

~ 

# x

( W O O N N N N N C

~ N @ Q N N F ~ J Q

~

# a z> ; 

# Q~> U 

### O~~
w 

# Z > O 

## U



# w J a ~ 

### O U O

~ 

## K w 

## H

W > 

## J 

## > w

~
~ ~ 

# a

W ~ W



# ~ J o w~ a z 

# 7-O wU U W 

## J d Z) 

## O 

# U O

~
~ W F = - a~ w 

# W :E 

## O 

# a ~

w CD w 

# zr



# ~ 2 

# J F

o~ 

# J a 

### 2

~ ~ 

## n.

~ 

# _ Qw > (D 

## z Fj 

# gJ t7 w Of ~ 0
~ 0 ~ 0

~ 

# C w % I
~ ~ m 

# ¢ E 

## U

~ 

# 4 ui
a J 

# . z 

# ¢<

~



# W d Z E 

## - `t

w 

# w Z ~
~ 

## H

~ 

## ~
~ 

## 8
~ ~

~ pO 

# w F

o a'

~ 

## N 

# "O 0 ~ 

# v

~ 

# w ~ W

x ¢ w W 

## ~ O Jm O S 

## v 0 (~ tt_ 0 a ~



# ~ Q W 

# w x 

# w

J 

# W H 

# 0) W U) m 

# U) O J ~ z~



### F 

## cn J / Q Y

U N N d) 

### ro a

~ 

## O N
~ 

### N 

## ' C N N

~

~
~

~ 

# m

~ N N

~

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation

- 

### Hanlev Plant



## 5.0 INTERNAL QA/QC ACTIVITIES 5.1 QA Audits Tables 5.1.1 -5.9 illustrate the QA audit activities that were performed during this test. All meter boxes and sampling trains used during sampling performed within the requirements of their respective methods as is shown in Tables 5.1.1 - 5.2.2. All pre-test and post-test leak checks were well below the applicable limit. Minimum metered volumes and percent isokinetics were also met where applicable. Tables 5.3 and 5.4 illustrate the nitrogen oxides, and carbon monoxide calibration audits whieh were performed during this test (and integral to performing EPA Method 7E, and 10 correctly) were all within the Measurement System Performance Specifications of t3% of span for the Zero and Calibration Drift Checks, t5% of span for the System Calibration Bias Checks, and t2% of span for the Calibration Error Checks. Table 5.5 displays the NO2 to NO converter efficiency check. The converter efficiency check was conducted as per the procedures contained in EPA Method 7E, Section 8.2.4 which requires a conversion of at least 90%. As shown an average converter efficiency of 97.34% was achieved for the NO x analyzer utilized at the Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack. Table 5.6 displays the EPA Method 25 train leak check audit results which were performed prior to each TGNMO concentration run. Table 53 displays the HCI and HF collection efficieney. The collection effieiency was determined in accordance with the Source Testing Manual (Revision 3.3), Section 2.8 which requires a collection efficiency of? 95%. As shown all the collection efficiencies of HCI and HF at both test locations were above the limit.Table 5.8 displays the results of the EPA Method 8 Audit Sarnple analysis. The results were transmitted by email to Mr. Bryon Richwine, Pennsylvania Dept, of Environmental Protection. On July 15, 2008, Mr. Richwine inforined Air Compliance Testing, Ine. that the two (2) reported audit concentrations met EPA Method 8, Section 11.4.3 criteria. Table 5.9 displays the results of the EPA Method 26A Audit Sample analysis. The results were transmitted by e-mail to Mr. Bryon Richwine, Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection. On July 14, 2008, Mr. Richwine informed Air Compliance Testing, Inc. that the two (2) reported audit concentrations met EPA Method 26A, Section 11.5.3 criteria. Observer Charles Giffels was certified on April 2, 2008 as a Visible Emissions Evaluator. The expiration date is six months from the issue date. For quality assurance, the observers obtained a view of the emissions with the best available contrasting background and with the sun oriented in the 140° sector to their back. Readings were taken every 15 seconds and made to the nearest 5% opacity.

Test Date: June 24 

## and 25, 2008 Page 27 

### Air Compliance Tesfing, Inc. - 080609

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanlev Plant



## 5.2 QA/QC Problems
No QA/QC problems occurred during this test event.

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 28 AirCompliance Testing, Inc. 

### - 080609o ~



# v o a A

~ C N

Uj O 

## a o

~
~ L N 

### U

~ 

### ^

O O 

### O Y' ~ O ✓ 1 ' ~ p

° ~^
O

,p U U .p o o ,9 eeV

ro ~ G. 

# °

a 

# V U

b

kn O b

«I

~ 

# ° v

,ti a P. Q

O 

### O .a 0

~ 

### V 0> Q U

~ 

### ro

U Q M

0

~ o
~
~

~

~



### y 0



### O 0

~ 

### O

~

~

M



### O V O

a 

# w ~ 

# R d a U U 

# _

vl a~

i 

### O v a 3 

### Q b 

# E CJ

0 V



### w o U

c ~ i
0 U m 0

rL N
~ Q 

### O U

~ 

### N N

U Q ~ ° ~ ° ~ °

~ ~ 

# m

~ »~ 

# y
~ d

~ 

# U

~ 

# w a .G F

~

~

'b

~ Q 

# q .~ Y. 

### F

~ G

~ ~ N

~ A 

### N o- "L!

.~

~ 

### "U. O
~

~ QI 

## W ti

~ 

### N

~ ~
~ F

W

O O N

~ N

~ 

### N V N N C
~ ~ 

### N N 0 N 

### N
~~ 0 ~ 0 ~ °

~ s

~

~ ~
~ ~ ~ 

## ~ .~ 

# U

~ 

## Q

~ .G q 

# H

~
~ 

### a, b d' q .~ H

~ q4

~

~ ~
~ ~
~

~ QI 

### W N

~ 

### Vi

~ ~ 

### O m 

# a ~



### O V ~



## u o p A d d

Uj O g 

## °
C 

## d 

# U a

O V 

### O

Y y N b .d N N cC N

~ 

### a ~ O

U U 

### O



## c •a



## y

'

~ d

. I 

## O Y 6



## ro U 

## o

w~ 

## ,,,, ° v


## .d C 

## x o



## w x 0



## Q •CJ

O A~ N ~

U

~ 0



### d•

~ O

~ O N ° ~ •-~

O p O ~ d

~ •. i'I N

a C + °

~ 

### h

.~ 

# k

L CG p

p V V M ° 

## u ~ 

## o

~ ~r



## . a u °

O V 

### o

O

❑ p ,9 U U ,9 0 0 .o



# a Y


# a N b



# ~ ~ y N 

# ci id N N



### N U 

### c7 c7

p 0 

### °

•O

N N F4 .o 

# L J

~ O 

### ° L6 N V C N 

### d N N C ~ 7 N N
~ 

### N N 

### Fu
~ « ~ u ~ u u ~


### 'C V d

. ~ 

### C d w

~ w o 

### p y e o
U .. w

d ~

~ L+ 

# O

_ o

~ 

# U u d

:? • 

## L y V



# on C7 w > 

# o 4 ~ .0 

# q d U

t6 O
~ L 

# E i W O

L 

# ~ Q1 

### u 

# a

~ N V 

# u

~ U

~ i

'S7 J 

# L d

~ .1 L 

## w /r CJ Gl e 

### o p 

### a y 0

~ y ~

~ vQ Q QI Q



# V] p d U w d

w V



# q d U
R O L 

# q : Q o rn 

# W ~ 

# F V

~ 

# o w d QI ~ 0) 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 

## s

= 

# m G ~ N F~ d V G 

### W 

### 4.

~ 

### O 

### U 

# a Q

M N 

# a

0 O

~ N

~ C W V N N C 3
~ N 

# m n

~ ~ h~ p ~ p ~ 0

~ 

## C

~ w ~

~ 

### v U C
~

~ O 

### U
~ Q d

~ 

### « CL 

### ~
u d

~ L Ly h
N A O p



## ~ ~ R



# a3 ° A ~ 

# a

d M+ u d G R G L



# u V~ 

### V 

# u v c U W F y •a .+

y 

### u,

u

• d 

### «

N L y



### c r 

### bD (7 L ✓ 1 ~ 

### L L A 

## A 

# d U

~ 

# o

~ a L

Y ~ 

### W E L 

### o N 1 d 

### a ~ 

## u 

## A « N
u u 

## d

'O U O G

~ w

~ h u A o p



## ~ 

# a 3

h 

### 0


## a L i A

~ ° 

## ->Wa o 0

~ A

+ f



## A 

# d U

o ~ 

# C7 ' ~ 

# E V W o L 

### L ~ 

### a M 

## m a"

O 0 N N N a c 

# m v N N C ~ ~ 

### N N 0 .. N N F

# 1

.

~ 

# s C~ 

## c 

# v F. 

### d u c 

# m 2 O U

~ Q d 

# a

~

O p o O p o

~
~ h
~ u

~ t a

~

~ u 

# L N O O O O p O

r~
y 

# .a

~ 

# >" z z z z 6'
rti

0 

### 0 0 0 0 0 0 

### ++ 

### H o 4, 

### N o 4, N 

### C

~ 

### d '~ ?? 

### ro 

### C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7

Q~ ' 

# b

• y ~ " 

# N ~

y

. 

# o U

C F ✓ y



### u" , Y



### ~ •~ ~ 

# 8 U ~~

N N

o



### 'a 0



### w . 

# o G w 0.1


# U

V ~~ D

W 

# U

'.~ 

### cn 

# w° 4

~ N N

q

w

c


# N ~D

•,



# n

i3 ~



# o

m M M o ~ 

# a

O 

### ~ 

### N

~ c m 

### N N C

~ 

### N N O m m h~ 

# A H 

# a C N C 

### O

~
~ 

### .~ 

# U
L

~ C ¢ O 

### "O


### ~

~ 

## W

~ 

### vi Y

~

~ 

## M Of 

# d ~ p to p ~ 0

~ s 

# m

~ 

### d ~
~ C 

# ro c O 

### U

~ Q ~ ~ ci Gn cl 

### ~ V) V) 0 V) 0 V)

~ 

### a
M

~

~ 

## ~ = 0 W 

### W W W

cn W

A 

## ~

CYi N ~ ,•- M p p ~ W

, G 7

~ i U ~ 

## A 

# U 0 0

~ .r, ~ W W 

## C

~

~
v~ 0

~ 

## n PL cn' rn cn v ~ 

## 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

C7 0 C7 0 0 C7 C7

N

Q

o

~ 

### U G1

N 

### N ❑

O

• U

N

„ ❑ i 0 

### y ❑

O

U

N :~ 

### U

N



### ~_ `.~ 

### o "-~



### UT fCn 0 ca



### v~ r ~ 

### o `^.

DF LY~

~a



### El


### ~n °~, 

### U O

L 

### N

~

0

.o U


### ~

~ 

### ~~ O L 

### N

,.

.fl U



### ~ .~ 

### N

v~

. 

### V -+

v~ •~ 

### y a

.~,



### ~ 0 0

~ 

### N L

~ Q •~



### y a

;j


### U

~ + 0



### t 

### N L

~

~ ~

~ y 

### m a

W

~



## N N 

### o

~ -;

W

•~



## N ~ 0 0 

### N N 

### v 

# m N N C
~ ~ 

## N N

~

~ 

## N H~ 0
~ 0
~ 0

~ s

~ C 

### .~
~ v ° ~ ~ .~ 

# U

~ Q


### M M

~ u

L;

~ 4 

# z z

~ 

# m

~ 

## N U T ¢ 5 1 4

U U .0 

### V

~ U C
~ 

# u w W
~

~ u 

# q O 

# U O y Fr

~

~ tri

~

~ F 

# M

~ 

# a 

# V

~ ~ y

~ ~ 

### W
C o 

## U

~

, C 7

~ i 

## V

.~ V 

# U

~ 

# a

~ 

### C U 

# o O 

# z 

# a O

- M 

### b ~ 

### O

~ 

### b 

### .P.
w 

# O 

# z 

# a

? 

### ,o ° ~

U

ro G U V

N U

~ 

# U O V

~ 

### N

~

~ ~ O O N

~ 

### N a C 

### N V N N C
~ ~ 

### N W
~ N N F~ 0
~ 0
~ 0

~

~

~ C :. N 

### ti N 

### U C ro

. Q 

## E 0 U

~ 

### Q v 0

u d

a ~ 

### o a

~ y N

~ 3 ~ 

### W C ~ L V

~
~ i q
. U N N



### ~ N 

## a 

## U 

# C

. ~


## ry ~ 

## F a a a c a 

# w m 

### M m a

~ 0 0 N L6 N V C N V N N G

~ ~ N W

~ N N H

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Cornoration - Hanlev Plant

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct

EPA M26A Sampling Train Total Mass of HCI in Sample (mg) Mass of HCI in Last

Impinger (mg) HCL Collection

Efficiency (%) Run 1 

## < 6.60 0.08 98.79 Run2 <4.50 <0.13 100 Run 3 

## < 6.43 

## < 0.14 100

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Inlet Duct

EPA M26A SamplingTrain Total Mass of HF in Sample (mg) Mass of HF in Last

Impinger (mg) HF Collection

Efficiency (%) Run 1 352.17 10.60 96.99 Run 2 276.52 5.51 98.01 Run 3 380.14 7.41 98.05

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack

EPA M26A Sampling Train Total Mass of HCl in Sample (mg) Mass of HCI in Last

Impinger (mg) HCL Collection

Efficiency (%) Run I 

## < 1.22 

## < 0.16 100 Run 2 

## < 1.34 

## < 0.11 100 Run 3 

## < 1.69 

## < 0.14 100

Ceric Kiln Scrubber Exhaust Stack

EPA M26A Sampling Train Total Mass of HF in Sample (mg) Mass of HF in Last

Impinger (mg) HF Collection

Efficiency (%) Run 1 

## < 2.67 

## < 0.16 100 Run 2 

## < 2.96 

## < 0.11 100 Run 3 

## < 3.46 

## < 0.14 100 The °<" symbol indieates thatcompound was not present in quantitics above tho Minimum Detection Limit

(MDL) oftheanalytieal method for at least one sample fraetion.



### Table 

## 5.7 - EPA Method 26A Collection Efficiency Results Table

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 37 

### Air 

### Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609~ ~

~ ~ N F~

. U U C ro

. Q 

## E 0 

### U

~ Q 

# I

M N kn O i

~ ~ N ~ ~ M

Q1

~ M r M 00 O

~

N ~ 00 O

e O N ~ ~ M ~ r C M 

### W

~

Q ~ ~ b

~ +' F y. ~ O 7 ~ Q~ C Q~ U ~ O 

### W V

b ~ C 0 

### a m c4 ~

~ y ~ ~i
~ "C1
~

~

~ ®

~

~

~

~ 

## W
07

~

~ 03 ~ ! ~
m 

# a

ro 0 0 N

~ N D C 

### N <Y 

### N N C ~ ~ 

### N 

# m 0 l/1 N

~rn 0 0 0 ~ 0

~

, ~
~ 

### N F~ N U C ~ Q

~ O U
~ 

### G

~ ~ h 

### Y 

# a

.~

... b
~
~ ~i
~ 

### N b 0 .C7
~

~ Y I -/. A4 

### W i

~

~ F~ 

### M N m a N M r N

~ 7 O ~

r ~ M

~ ~

~

00 N r N

~ M O ~

M i

~ ~

~
A ~ H 

### v E 

## E V
%p o o ~ 

## d h d ~ 

### W 

## o V •o ~ C 0 

## a v 

### RS ro 0 0 N

~ N

~ C N V N N C
~ 7 

### U1 (6 O a d HCompliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gerv Corporation - Hanlev Plant

. 1 G". ~ \it.

~ . 

## Appendix attached.

Test Date: June 24 and 25, 2008 Page 40 

### AirCompliance Testing, Inc. - 080609

# APPENDIX to Compliance Stack Emission Test Report 

# Determination of Total Filterable Particulate Matter, Nitrogen Oxides, Sulfur Dioxide, Sulfuric Acid, Carbon Monoxide, Total Gaseous Nomethane Organic, Hydrochloric Acid, Hydrofluoric Acid and Visible

Emissions Ceric Kiln
EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7E, 8, 9, 10, 25, and 26A Glen-Gery Cornoration - Hanlev Plant

Summeville, Pennsylvania Date Conducted: June 24 and 25, 2008 Job Number: 080609

Prepared by: 

# Air Compliance Testing, Inc.

, PO BoX 41156 Cleveland OH 44141-0156 Phone:(800) EPA-AIR1 (372-2471) 

### Report Date: July 31, 2008

# Appendix Contents

PROCESS AND CONTRACTED LAB DATA EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATIONS f HISTORY Process Operational Data - AII (PRINT) Micromanometer Certificate (when utilized) Contracted Lab Analytical Results - AII Dry Gas Meter Calibration History Record of Custody Sheets - Contracted EAcetone Aneroid Barometer/ DPG Calibration History ResidualsHistory 131a!?—ov 

## ~ FIELD AND INTERNAL LAB DATA x Excel Test Data Tabs (PRINT) X lExcel Method Speciflc Tab (PRINT) X Excel Run Data Tab (PRINT) X Example Calculation (PRINT) Calibration Gas Certifications ,e Quartz or Glass Fiber Filter Certification x Reference Meter Calibration T92 Thermocouple Certificate of Calibration Lake Balance (Method 4 and ALT-008) Lake Balance Report for H64 (Gravimetrics) TVE Azimuth Tables x VE Declination VE Certificates Intent to Test Notification (Compliance Only) (PRINT) Record of Custody Sheets - In House Test Log (CEMS Methods) Main Method Field Data Sheets Isokinetic Field Data Sheets ACT Laboratory Analysis (titrations) Gravimetric Analysis (Method 5, 17, and 202) Acetonellnorganic/Organic Residuals Calc. EPA Method 9 Field Data EPA Method 4 and ALT-008 Moisture Recovery EPA Method 3 Fyrite/Orsat Field Data EPA Method 3 Dry Molecular Weight Calculation EPA Method 2 Flow Data Sheets EPA Method 1 Cyclonic Flow EPA Method 1 Preliminary Field Data EPA Method 1 Criteria (REAPEAT THIS SECTION FOR EACH STACK) ANALYZER CALIBRATIONS ® Analyzer Calibration Error Analyzer System Bias and System Drift EQUIPMENT INSPECTIONS / CALIBRATIONS X 10-Minute Cals - AII X Probe Nozzle Inspections - AII (isokinetic Methods) Y Pre-Test Pitot Tube / Probe Inspections - AII X Post-Test Pitot Tube / Probe Insp. - AII (Cornpliance Only)



# B ~ C B Pre-Test Thermocouple System Audit Post-Test Thermocouple Check (Compliance Only) Pre-Test Meter Box Leak Check Pre-Test Dry Gas Meter / Orifice Calibration Pre-Test Meter Console Calibration Post-Test Dry Gas Meter / Orifice Calibration Post-Test Meter Console Calibration *Post Test Calibrations Required for all Mini Meter Boxes and when Yqa does not pass.

Air Compliance Testing

, lnc. -appendix checklists.xls-Appendix Checklist 

### A T-MTB - 

### u 13 C T-MTB - 

## Gamma Gamma Del H 2,0t6 

### Del H 

## Date 5/zg/„A

, Date T-PRB- 6io 

### T-PRBT-PRB - 611 

### T-PRB - T-PRB - T-PRB - 

# T-PIT- T-PITT-PIT- T-PITT-PIT- T-PITBAL- 

# y°: ~ 

## BAL

# BAL- BALB T-MTB - o16 D T-MTB - Gamma 

## o.99q4 Gamma Del H 

### 1,715 Del H Date Date T-PRB - 

### ,yo: ~ T-PRB - T-PRB - 

### 6vff T-PRB - T-PRB - T-PRB - 

## T-PIT- T-PITT-PIT- T-PITT-PIT- T-PITBAL- nv

_ BALBAL- BAL-~ cu
~ oo 0 N 

### CU m j N 

## U a ~ 

## O N D+ 0-
~ ~ N M ~ N S ~ c 

### U ~ R CO 

## a) 

# p ~ M M z a 

# m m m c 

### c p
~ ~ 

### o a) o (D

p~ m p~ m

- 

# o

- 

# o N m 

## -O C 

### ca

a

~ 

### m m

U 

### ~ 

### a

N 

### a

N

~ 

# F a o 

# o a w w

L tm N ~ C R p O 

# ~ ~

~ 

### y 

## a . o n

~ 

### m S 'a

N cu

~ 

### U O

o ~ O

o Iq 

### aa ~ ~ 

# m ~ 

### 0


## • {p U 

# ° m 

# o 0

~ o



### N 0



### N 

## p N j N N h ~ ~



### m m 

# 0 m 0 O



### G C J 

# Y Y 3 0 LL

J a a a a S 

## fl ~ ~ 2



## „ LO

. :D a 

## s c ~ 

### n a Q 

### co ~ O 

### E0 0 0 0

0 O p EM m 

### ~

C' N 

### cm 0 

### oo 0

i 

### i O ~ N x 

### w N y N U t0 U) 0 N


### v N 

## d

~ 

## m 

# ~

~ 0 a` T m 

### x

# ~

0 

# a

~

~

~



### ~ 

# a 

# N

~ 

## O

~



## ~~ 

## ~
~
~ 

# ~
~ O

~



## ~

~



## ~

po 

## 00 0 N 

## ~ 

# a 0 W 

## a 

# ~

6 A
~.

. J 

# ~
~



### ~ ~ ~


# ~

~

~ 

# U 0
~ ~

~ 

# U .o 00 

# ° o 

### N N 

# ~

., ti

Y 

# ~ ~ 

# ti

. ~


### ¢ a ~ 

# N 0



## ~ 

## ~

~ ~ ~



## ~

~ i 

# U N


## ~

~ O 

# U

` h



### ~ 

# -fi U ti

~ ~ 

# a
p
.~ 

# >, 

# ~

~

r ~ ^ -1 

## ~ Q 

# 0
~



# ~ 

# U
q

~

~ 

## ~ 

# N 0
~

# ► ~ 8

~ 

# zn

~
~ Y

~



### > C

~ 

# h 

# v 1 

### ~3

~ 

# `0

~ 

### 0 

# U

~

~

~ O Y

~


## ~ A r 

## a

~

~ 

# ~
~ 

# ~ ~ N



### ~

~ 

# O ~

.~ ~ h 

## i

~ ~



### ~

U 

## ~

O y q 

# O ~



# d O ~ o ~ o S~ l

~

15



### ~' ~ +~•, ~i ~ 

## o o ~ '~. '~ i ~

w 

# ° •.,
~ ~ ~ o ~ ° ~ ~ o

14) 4- 

## ~ ~ y ~ T4

Fr ti N <'ri eF tri co 

### 0 0 

# N M r~~ o 00 C ~

~ O O 00 O ~ 

### '-+ [n vi N N ~ ~ O Q N



### p



## rlf. II~

E 

### I 

### p p
:~ bCp


### •

y 

### b~ 

## A p,



### p 

## II

. 

# O 0 ~

0



## II II



# ~

p , ~ 

## II

0



# ~ (



## w a~ vi 

## r. 

# o U

r , ti



## e y o e

® 

# u ° a

.~ I

. II II II II II ~ ~ 0


### ~4 

# 2 ~M 

# N
~

~ v ~ M

~
..
V ..i 

## ~ ~


# ~
~

~ u

~

~ v 

# 8



# ~ ~ ~ 

# s p O M 

## 00 ~-I 

## H 4 ~

c~ 

# i U O II o

® ~
ur. 

## ~ o

H 

## 1

~ 0

~ 

## C'^ M 

## 00

~ kn 

## N
r~

e•



## ct
~

~ I

✓ ~ 

## ~ O

~

~ 

## w

~ 

# w ~ ~ ~ ~ M



### ~ O N O oo V) N h O 00



## cn o ~ 0) o ~ o 

## ^" O

ci II G bA CL 

## o. h 

# ~ m y V E 5C r ti

Cd



### ~ i, 

### ~ y t



### ~ 1, v y i Q. 

### ~ O ~ •C I t'. . 

### ~ ~ V 

### C -1 O p w II

V 

## ~ y yi C{ Vl II Q N 

## ~ Q 

## c c° a

. 

## a? p„ Cl. ~ 

### C13 m

~ 00 ✓

~ W E+ W (~ ~ ~ ' V t, ~i ~ ✓

~' ~ ' N ` ✓ ~ (~,7 II Q

~ 

## •, O Oi ^ ~ ~° M 

## ° O II z co 0 

# N M N~ 0 N

~

~ 

# a

~ 0
~ O

~ C

~
~

~ 

# CJ

~ a

~ 0 0 

## N N

~ r~



### h M 00

~ 1



# ~ O

~ .Q

~

~ 

# a ~

~ Q



# . J

~

~

~ ~ 

### ~ a ~

~

~ 

### ~ V A

y

~ 

# ~ C



### ~ 0

~ 

### ~

~



### ~ ~ ~ y 

### U 

## O

~ ~ 

## 7H 

# U

~ 

## C 

# Q 0 -v ti

~ H ti
~ 

# a

~ ~ ti

~ a+
~
~ O ti a. "C3


### ~ 

## N O ti O

~ C 

# U .~

.0
O 

### ~

~ 

## 6 0 i W 

## W N M 

## N

~


### ~ 

## LL 

# m

~ r 

## v~ m 

### m 

# N IC)
~ 

### N 

### c 

# 0

_ a ~ U H ~ ~

~ N ~ N



## U O 00 o

~ 

### r

~ ~ a

~

N

00 

### N 

## o r; 

# o U~



# c Q 

# G a

0 

### V 

## ~ u W 

# ~ 

# h

~ 

# F U a °O o

~ 

# °

U p N N ~ 

### N U o 

### r„a ~



### 0 N N

r~ 

# w ~ ~ 

# Q ~

~ 

### C cot ~



### W P~ 1 

### . Q, •w 

## ti o M O 

## rr

o M O r~.

o M o
rAM Q b W W} O O

Q 

# ~~ w F 

# 7 00 00 W

N 's' G G Q ~~



### Cy

~ n ✓

. et 7 7 7 7 7

4 M M M M M M

bll

rq fN. w

.~ 

# N N N N

— 

### o ~ W



# az o --



# o h h h

~ `' b ➢ 4y y ~ x o O O V1 ct' M 

# R

~ 

# t — E

i~

0 ~ ~

}



### ~ a ~



## ~ a ~ rA

### PRECISION ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.: US EPA METHOD 25 ANALYZER CALIBRATION 

# PAL Job No: M25-0837 Client Name and Sample Receipt Date: ACT-080609, 7/2/08 Sam le Reco ery and Anai sis Date: July 2, 2008, by C.G. Sirnon

Calibration Gas Species Cal gas

conc. ppmC Analyzer

ppmC range Response

x 1 Normal Area Counts Response



### x z Normal Area Counts Response



### x 3 Normal Area Counts Mean

Response X Normal Area Counts RF Normal

Area Counts/ ppmC %

RSD Average

RF



### A-- CO2 50.1 100 51.38 51.65 50.10 51.05 1.0189 1.62

B-- CO2 50.1 100 49.61 49.89 49.11 4953 0.9887 0.80 1.0038

B-- CO2 9,933 20,000 10,050 10,047 9,971 10,023 1.0090 0.45

C-- CO2 9,933 20,000 9,999 9,976 9,965 9,980 1.0047 0.18 1.0069



## A-- NMO 60.30 100 60.03 60.27 60.60 60.30 1.0000 0.48

A-- NMO 59.73 100 

## 59.74 59.53 59.92 59.73 1.0000 0.32

B-- NMO 59.73 100 62.26 61.49 62.41 62.1 

## 1.0389 0.79 1.0194

A-- CH4 48.98 100 48.88 

## 49.07 48.99 48.98 

## 1.0000 0.19

B-- CH4 48.98 100 49.09 48.92 49.06 49.02 1.0009 0.18 1.0004

A-- CO 51.03 100 50.16 51.04 51.89 51.03 1.0000 1.70

B-- CO 51.03 100 52.02 51.49 50.84 51.45 1.0082 1.15 1.0041 7/3/2008, PAL, Inc., 2106 NW 67th PL, S-4, Gainesviile, FL 32653; Phone (352) 335-1889, Fax (352) 335-1891

### PRECISION ANALYTICAL LABS, INC. US EPA METHOD-25 ANALYSIS DATA 

# PAL Job No: M25-0837 Client Name and Sample receipt Date: ACT-080609, 7/2/08 

## Sample Recovery and Analysis Date: Jul y 2, 2008, by C.G. S' tmon



## Samp[e ID Vessel Species Ctmj and Ccmk Analyzer Responses in lized area counts Ctm &

Ccm, Mean normal counts Disptay Range ppmc 

## (for reference only) Calib. factors RF Normal 

## Area counts /ppmC ppm in Sample Gas TGNMO 

## ppmC, Ct & Cc
M250837-609-1 

## T 

# an k-108 CO z 9,039 9,111 9,091 20,000 B, C 1.0069 18,213
AV/SV = 2.017 C

~ 

## , NMO

as C F

9,
9.9 10.9 10.1 100 A, B 1.0194 20.0 20.0 CH 4 43.92 44.62 44.03 44.2 100 A, B 1.0004 89.1 CO 107.7 110.9 108.5 109.0 200 A, B 1.004 

## 1 219.1 

## trap-1018 ICV-147 C" VOC 

## as CO 2 16.8 15.7 16.4 16.3 50 A, B 1.0038 17.0 AV/SV = 1 

## 1.048 NMO 1.27 1.29 1.31 1.31 50 A, B 1 1.0194 1.31 18.3
M250837-609-1 Tank-132 CO z 11,219 11,247 11,271 11,246 20,000 B, C 1.0069 24,475
AV/SV = 1191 C t , 

## NMO

as C 10.9 10.7 10.1 10.5 100 A, B 1.0194 22.7 ~ 

## 22.7 CH 4 48.90 48.46 48.36 48.6 100 A, B 1.0004 106.4 CO 118.2 118.1 119.2 118.5 200 A, B 1.0041 258.7 

## trap-1082 ICV-148 C" VOC 

## as CO 2 29.1 30.2 29.4 29.6 50 A, B 1.0038 32.9 AV/SV = 1.117 INMO 0.60 0.59 0.621 0.6 50 1 A, B 1.01941 0.7 33.6 M250837-609-1 Tank-177 C 11,987 11,955 11,850 11,931 20,000 B, C 1.0069 21,820
AV/SV = 1.842 C„ NMO

as C 13.2 12.5 12.1 12.6 100 A, B 1.0194 22.8 22.8 CH 4 

## 53. 27 53.28 53.37 53.3 100 A, B 1.0004 98.1 CO 129.5 129.9 130.3 129.9 200 A, B 1.0041 238.2

_ 

## trap-1095 ICV-149 C" VOC 

## as CO 2 20.9 21.1 21.9 

## 21.3 50 A, B 1.0038 20.1 AV/SV = 0.949 NMO 1 

## 0.98 1.03 1.00 1.0 50 1 A, B 1 1.0194 0.9 1 21.1 7/3/2008 PAL, Inc. 2106 NW 67th PL, S-4, Gainesville, FL 32653; Phone (352) 335-1889, Fax (352) 335-1891

### ~

b , W a 4 N

~ ~ y 

# a ✓ + ~

~ N

~

.0
i •y~ .o ' r J 

# ~ ~ w

pt 

# ~
, z78 ~ 

### .L q ~ Q N ~ ~ E'•i ~ t~a

~ u 

# W ~ ~T-

...

W) JJl H Z 

# I

~

\

` O ~ 

# °

## Method 25 Record of Custody Sheet
Shipping/Transportation Contalner Number: 

# ~ 71L _ 

### Lnats:
~ 

### • f ~~ 

### ^noler Number:

• ~ -- 

## I

~ = _ ~~~I /.r.l• ~ /

~ 

### ~ .L-1C ~
I • •

~ 

# ~ 1 : / . I •

i ,..e, 1:1• • 

## ~

: ♦ Y 

## ~ ~ ~~~ 

# ~ ~~ 

# A '~ ~ 

## i ~~ 

# / •

~ 

# =

(Tr ap # 1 : 1 . 1 ! i n '



### 080609 

# ~ lfi.
~ 

# ~ 

# ~~ C / 

# ~ ,1~ 

## ~A~l~ 

# _~~~ 1~~ 'h'f' 

## ~~ i -{• • ' I 

# d~~_%

~ 

# ~'~ r

~ 

# ~ ~t. ~ I~



# ~ I 1:/.{.

. 

# ~~ er~~- -~.~ ,~~.~. 

# ~~f

f , . ~ ,• ~~ J 

# on { 8 / . { • i ~ 

# n 

# n

Were all seals intect? 

## l 

# vz

~ Kecetved By Samp{e Custodian reasor 

### ~ ngin the "Remark '



## ~

'
- aps put in cooler by

Remarks:



### , AirComFlrance TeatJrrg, lnc. '.. (Method25.xls•RecardofCustodysheet)811712ooa 

### (Dele) 

# (1'OO (Time)
Job Number Q$Q6Q9 B Done 

# 8y 1 Date: ~ ( % t l 

### Ja Flha! Check By! Date: J 

### (~ 1 7. 1, 

# <7e

## PREClSiONANALY7ICAL LABORATOR/£S, 

## INC 2906 

## MvV 67T1•1 PLACE, SU17E,4, GAINESVfLL£, FLORIDA 32653

(352) 

## 335-9889 FlIX j352J 33&1892 

# US EPA Reference Method 25 Sample Calcutations Notes:

. 

## (1.) PAL .uses calibrated piezoelectric digital absolute pressure gauges as well as open ended nnercury (Hg) fitled u-tube manometers for field and laboratory pressure measurements, ' Pressu,ies measured wifh, open ended Hg manometers are corrected to ab.solute (standarcl) pressures

using , the following relation: (a6solute P) =(measured P) +(barometric P) ' (2.) Ternperatures are recorded in °F or °C and converted to Kelvins using the following relations:

{°F-32)I1.8 + 273:15 = K, and °C + 273.15 = K Standard temperature = 20"C = 293.15K (3.) Insome cases, the equations listed below are expanded versions of those presented in ' 40CFR F't. 60, App. A, Meth, 25 ; pp. 850-851 (Rev. July 1993). ' (4.) The foliowing relations are relevant to the equations below: 293.15K / 760 mm Hg = 0.3857 K/mm Hg 1 atmosphere =1013 mbar = 760 mm Hg = 29.92" Hg 293.15K/1013 mbar = 0.2894 Klmbar 1" Hg pressure = 33.863 mbar = 25.401 mm Hy g 293.151C129.92" Hg = 9.798 Kfin. Hg 

## Tfie fotiowing terms are used in the equations below: C= TGNMO concentration of the effluent, ppm C equivalent Ce = Caiculated condensibte organic (condensate trap) concentration of the effluent, ppm C equivalent Ccm = Measured cohcentration (NMO analyzer) for the condensate trap ICV, ppm. CO2 + TH. Ct- Caiculated noncondensible organic concentration (sample tank) of the effluent, ppm C equivalent, Ctm = Measured concentration (NMO Anaiyzer) for the sampte tank, ppm NMO. mc = TGNMO mass concentrationof the effluent, mg C/dscm F a sample flow rate ; cc/mtn. Pf = Final pressure of the ICV, inches of Hg, absolute. Pb = Barometric pre5sure, inches of Hg or mbar (29.92" Hg = 1013 mbar) 

## Pti = Gas sample tank pressure before sampiing, mbar absolute. Pt = Gas sample tank pressure after sampling, mbar absolute. 

## Ptf = Final gas sample tank pressure affer pressurizing, inches Hg absolute. Tf = Final teittperature of ICV, Kelvins. Tti = Sampie tank temperature before sampling, Kelvins. 

## Tt = Sample tank temperature at completion of sampling, Kelvins. Ttf = Sarnple tank temperature after pressurizing, Kelvins. V = Sample tank volume, (cc). Vv = ICV volume, Cc. Vs = gas voluine sampled, cc. 

## Vt = Sample train volume, cc. (Dimensional calculations yield Ct = 60 cc for PAL trains.) n= number of data points q= total number of analyzer injections of ICV during analysis (where k=injection number, 1, ..., q). r= total number of analyzer injections of sampie tank during analysis (where j=injection number, 1, ..., r). : xi = individuai measurements. ' x = mean value eP = Allowable pressure change, inches Hg. © = Leak check period, minutes, a

; ~~

## PREC1S10N ANALYTlCAL LABORATORIES, INC 2106 NW 67TN PLACE, SUITE 4, GA/NESVILLE, FLORiDA 32653

(352) 335-1889 FAX (352) 335-1891 

# Method-25 Caiculations


# Tank Vo/umes Procedure: Each tank was weighed to the nearest gram while filled with ambient air and while filled with degassed distilled water. The temperature of the water was measured and the volume of the tank calculated. V=[wt. of tank + water (g)] -[wt. of tank + air (g)] /[density of water at the recorded temp. (g/cc)]


# Pre-SamAlina Leak Check Allowable Pressure Chanae eP =(0.01)(F)(Pb)(e)/Vt = [(0.01)(100 cc/min)(Pb)(5 min)] /[ 60 cc] eP = 2.5" Hg for a barometric pressure (Pb) of 29.92" Hg.


# SamD/e Vo/ume Vs = (.3857)M [(Pt/Tt) - (PtifTti)], or 'Vs = (0.2894)(1/) [(Pt/Tt) - (Ptil1'ti] "This equation includes a 

## constant for pressure expressed in mbar



# Noncondensible Oraanics, Ct Notes: Response factor =(calibration gas concentration, ppm as C)/(nstrument response, ppm as C) The M-25 analyzer has a reproducble interference of 2.3 ppm NM as C per % CO2 in the sample gas stream. Ct =[Ptf/Ttf) / (Pt/Tt)-Pti/Ttq1/r E6=1, ..r)Ctmj] - [CO2 interference]) = (Analysis V / Vs) (Ctm) where Ctm =([1/r S6=1, ..r)Ctmj] -[CO2 interference]) =[(avg NM integrator response) (integrator range, ppm) (response factor) /(1000 units full scale)]-[(% CO2 in tank at Ptf) (2.3 ppm NM as C interference/°/"CO2)j 

# Condensible Oraanics, Cc Cc = (0.3857) (Vv/Vs) [1/q E(k=1, ..q)Ccmk] 

## (Pf/Tf) where [1/q S(k=1, ..q)Ccmk] and Ccm =(average CO2 peak ht. )/(1000 ht. units full scale) (CO2 range, ppm) (response factor)


# TGNMO Concentration TGNMO Mass Concentration C = Ct + Cc mc, mg/dscm =( 0.4993) (C)

### U 

## z (d LdJ 

## x O

~ O 

# m 1, 

# t, o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

~ r , ., V N M Ob c}' h M t' ~ cT ~O O~ ~D r+ rt' d' N M U

, d• V'i O

o O b0 t" ~ ~O h O O 00 O~ O~ O h ~D bb C

, r~ O O ~ b0 O ~

O~ ~ O~ O O~ O~ O~ O~ O~ O~ O~ O O \ O~ O~

ob Oi ..,_d'

~ v) M_O\ _ ~ h _~ ._~ ._V' O N C o U a

~ d OO ON 0 Vl d' O ~ p h ~ O
~~• a o 00 d' M ~ Q t, 

### ~ '"j b M M M M M '1, " M v 

### ~ ~ ? O • 

### C

~ h ;3 ?

q ,C y 2 

### ~ ,b p

~ + ` ®,C



### ~ 3 

## rp
00 

### t 

## z t rV N rV ~~ 

## rn N ~H ~~ vi tV rn m~
00 V C v M 

### i N 

### ~ '

~ i CV ~ tV O d f

~ l M H bQ V



### ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W 

### b q ~ ------- ----- - 

### v c~ U ~ ~ o 0 V

p 

### ' C~~ ? ~O Oi oo ~ ~ ~ ~ ? 00 00 O ~

~ 

### V'~ ~ N ~ r 

### ` ~^ M N tn ~ Oi CT o0 ~ +

~ 

### N C bA 

### .N Q ~



## `" M bb ob N N N ,- ~ •-~ ~ h -+ ~p N ~ N +-+ N N N N M M R3 

## U a M O ~ 01 4\ oo O O ~ 

### O bp o V

~ 

### ri
.-. 

### vi

~ 

### ri

~ 

### n vi ,- ~ 

### vi ,-+ d = ~ 

### Y

,-. 

### ct' d"

.- ~ 

### vi

.-~ 

### rr" ,-~

~ > ~ y 

### N cct V ~ 

### N q ~ 

### q
_ N w 00 00 O O O Vl t 

### n

~ 

### y y U O

~ 

### D 00 00 ~1 ~ Vl M M M h O ~ C^ O Ed c'C , ~ ~ V rn N N O O O 00 O

~ ❑ ~ w 

### vi tn In ~ a q i 

### vi vi vi V <Y vi Z ~A P~ 

### N td 00 N.d ~ q 

### a, L .~ C3

O 

### _ 00 r , M N h 

### O O~ 

### N M M `'~ ❑ ~ O v

~ i N 

### CC F.

~ 

### y Qi O ~ 

### O ob 00 Cb N N ct vi vi

a

... p ~ •fl G V ~ " 4 " (Sy bb 00 bb VD \O 00 OO OO 00 OO
y 

### d

M i O b0 O ~ ~ ~ ~ 

### v ~ 

### i ~ p h ~ ~ 

### II N

~~ 

### y- ~ 

### •rN q ~ r 'TS C> ~ W ~' Q " M N Q O M N d' N N

N M N 7 N N

N N N N N N N N ~ O 

### .-...._

_ ~ 

### ,. . o.__N

_ r- _ . W) - 

### M 07 N h h h 

# N

~ ,-+ +-' ~ v •

• ~ v~ .-. , ~ ry ~

U ~ ['~

,—~ [~ ,—~ ~ ~D

,—. Vl ,—. P ~ ,—, ~ ~ ,—. h~ ~ a> II p

bA 

### a V a j • ai + ~ 

### ..'"q 

### bA

~^ G " ~ r~• ~O c- 00 M d' d' d'

~ bb O~ 00 M ~ d i/1 ~ ~p ~,~ N~ r ~

~ ~ V

U O 

## ? U"y



## q '+~ 

## •L7 N •p o M O N •N 

### _-__ ~



### .-p oo y ~ ~, "O 

## u N ~ 

## N l



## Y U y ~ 

## bA v

~ 

## O °b 

## 6 ob

. O

~ 

## n M tiD ob C

~ 

## ^

" r
- • < G a d N- 

### a ~ 

### i ~ ~ cd e,~ Oi O~ " ~ M C~ ~f t~ m d 0 • 

### m > •[ C ~ 

### -G ~ 

### O
~ 

### •' U 

### H _. - _ ___ __ _ _ -__ — -

~ G ^ G CJ Y C C C V G ~ G 

### w m ^cJ O .o C'•



### ~ ' U eC

~ 

## 5 tC eC aS Rt RI V V V

a 

### ~ af 

### ~ 4• 

### ~ H 

## e i4 SE Y! Yd C4 OE V G G G •O 

### 9J "G3 

### Y "O 0 v i+ H G ^ .q .q T. .0 i " ~ " "q 'O "O
GT~ ~ j,. " • ~+ ~ U U N M t` OO O, 

### N

tx >C f V ~ ~' ~' G C G ~ ~ G C C ~ G ~ ~ U O a
. U Q " V1 Pi f~ + tYi L~ 0.~i f~i tYi L' ~ (yi fyi f ~ i f ~ i OC)

~ M 

### m 

# 9 U
~ ai 

### m (X) I L6 M 

### m

~
~ 

### N C O .0 

## a N1

~ 

## N M 

### ro ca p LL 

### N .N N C 

### ~

~ V (/7 

### V w 

## a y co 

## Z O r 

## N U c 

## N N O Co 

# a J U_ N Q C 0 

# . N U

~ 

## a
O 

### N
~

~ r

# /~o

i R L 

# ~Q~J~~~ ScoflSpeciahyGases 

# ~ a ~J ( 1 -1 ~ TA ~ CI '~` S Air Liquide America Special 

## ty 

# Dual-Analyzed Calibration Standard

6141 EASTON ROAD, BLDG 1, PLUMSTEADVILLE, PA 18949-0310 Phone: 800-331-4953 Fax: 215-766-7226 I


## CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas 

# ~ Assay Laboratory Customer P.O. No.: 792736 AIR CONSULTING & ENGRING SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES Project No.: 01-82649-001 6141 EASTON ROAD, BLDG 1 2106 NW 67TH PLACE PLUMSTEADVILLE, PA 18949-0310 GAINESVILLE FL 32606 I ANALYTICAL INFORMATION This certification was performed according to EPA Traceability Protocol For Assay & Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards; .'.. Procedure G-1; September, 1997. , I Cylinder Number: ALM055366 Certification Date: 28May2008 Exp. Date: 28May2011 Cylinder Pressure***: 2000 PSIG ' ANALYTICAL

. COMPONENT CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION (Moles) ACCURACY" TRACEABILITY PROPANE 21.1 PPM +/- 1 ek Direct NIST and NMi AIR BALANCE
*** Do not use when cylinder pressure is below 150 psig.

. * Analytical accuracy is based on the requirements of EPA Protocol Procedure Gt, September 1997. 

### REFERENCE STANDARD TYPE/SRM NO. EXPIRATION DATE CYLINDER NUMBER CONCENTRATION COMPONENT NTRM 1667 04Ju12008 ALMO22121 49.80 PPM PROPANE '
INSTRUMENTATION INSTRUMENT/MODEL/SERIAL# DATE LAST CALIBRATED . ANALYTICAL PRINCIPLE

..... VARIAN/3300/7945 28May2008

. GC/PID 

### ANALYZER READINGS (Z=Zero Gas R=Reference Gas T=Test Gas r=Corre)ation Coefficient)

First Triad Analysis Second Triad Anatysis CaRbration Curve '...... 

### PROPANE Dato: 28May2008 Response UniCAREA Concantratlon=A+9x+CS2+De3+Ez4 ~ Z1=0.00000 R1=252854.0 Tt=101663.0 r=.9999997 1668

. 112=252599.0 Z2=0.00000 T2=101846.0 Cunstants: A=4.82868802 ~ Z3=0.00000 T3=101775.0 R3=252538.0 e=1.96999E-04 C=1.31022E-12 AvO. Concentration: 20.10 PPM D= E_

~ . . • ~ . ~ 

### C. Page 

### 1 of 1

# Dual-Analyzed Calibration Standard

I N129 0 

# Scott Specialty G 

# a ses COMBERMERE STREET,TROY,MI 48083 Phone: 248-589-2950 Fax: 248-689-213


## CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas Assay Laboratory Customer P.O. No.: PAL AI RCbt

~ SULTING & ENGINEERING SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES Project No.: 05-43082-008 1290 COMBERMERE STREET 

### TROY,M148083 SUITE #10 2106 NW 67TH PLACE GAINESVILLE FL 32606 

### ANALYTICAL INFORMATION This certification was performed according to EPA Traceablrty,Protocol For Assay & Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards; Procedure G-1; September, 1997. Cylinder Number: ALM013029 ,

~ ,, ~ "'Certification Date: 17May2006 Exp. Date: 16May2009 Cylinder Pressure***: 1950,PSIG CONIPONENT

. 

### OERTiFIED CONCENTRATIONWoles) ACGURACY ** 

### TRACEABILITY CA ON DIOXIDE 9,933 .- PPM, +/- 1% ~'~ :. Direct NIST and NMi CARBON MONOXIDE 51.
' 03 PPM +/- 1%.

~ Direct NIST and NMi METHANE 48:98 PPM - Direct NIST and NMi PROPANE 19•91 PPM 1% ` Direct NIST and NMi AIR BALANCE„ '*' Do not use when cylinder pressure is below 150 psig. Analytical accuracy is base,d on the requirements of EPA Protocol Procedure G7; September 1997. 

### REFERENCE STANDARD

. TYPE/SRM NO

. EXPIRATION DATE ' CYLINDER NUMI3ER

-- CONCENTRATION COMPONENT: NTRM 2300 O1Jan2008 ALM049142 CARBON DIOXiDE NTRM 1679 02Apr2007 ALMO26128 44.90 PPM CARBON MONOXIDE NTRM 2750 01Mar2007 ALM009178 43:80 PPM METHANE -?! ~ NTRM 1667 04Ju12008 ALM019225 ' 49 SM PROPANE INSTRUMENTATION INSTRUMENT/MODEL/SERIAL# DATE LAST CALIBRATED °
- ,; ANALYTICAL PRINCIPLE VARIAN/3400/10693 04May2006j;, < THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY HORIBA/AtA-220/57297601 15lNay2006'-

. ' NDIR VARIAN/3400/7506 25Apr2006 TCD/FID VARIAN/360010455 FLAME IONIZATION 

## ANALYZER READINGS

-~ Zero Gas R Re erence Gas!:' =, est' as '{.= orrelation oe icient

First Triad Analysls Second Tr'iad Analysis Calibration Curve
CARBON DIOXIDE Date: 04May2006 Response Unit:MV Concentration=A+Bx+Cx2+Dx3+Ex4 Z7 =0.00000 R1 =1165579. T7 =50484.00 =0.999999 R2=1167434. Z2=0.00000 T2=50233.00 Constants: A=-0.012965 Z3=0.00000 T3=50126.00 R3=1165977. B=0.00002 C=0 Avg. Concentration: 9933, PPM D=0 E=0
CARBON MONOXIDE Date: 08May2006 Response Unit:PPM Date: 1510ay2006 Response Unit: PPM Concentration=A+Bx+Cx2+Dx3+Ex4 Z7=0.00000 R1=105.0000 T7=57.10000 Z1=0.00000 R1=105.0000 T1=57.00000 r=0.999992 R2=104.9000 Z2=0.00000 T2=57.10000 R2=104.9000 Z2=0.00000 T2=56.90000 Constants: A=0.661739 Z3=0.00000 T3=57.00000 R3=104.8000 Z3=0.00000 T3=56.90000 R3=105.2000 B=0.870621 C=0.000317 Avg. Concentration: 50.81 PPM Avg. Concentration: 51.24 PPM ' D=0 E=0
METHANE Date: 16May2006 Response Unit:AREA Concentration=A+Bx+Cx2+Dx3+Ex4 Z1=0.00000 R7=3703708. T7=376479.0 r=0.999989 R2=3702348. Z2=0.00000 T2=376799.0 Constants: A=-1.545108 Z3=0.00000 T3=376546.0 R3=3691 508. 8=0.000133 C=0 Avg. Concentration: 48.98 PPM D=0 E=0 

### PROPANE Date: 09May2006 Response Unit:AREA Concentration = A + Bx + Cx2 + Dx3 + Ex4 Zt =0.00000 R1 =51668.00 T7 =20604.00 r=0.999994 R2=51663.00 Z2=0.00000 T2=20547.00 Constants: A=0.081195 Z3=0.00000 T3=20588.00 R3=51621.00 8=0.000975 C=0

# 1 Cj



# Scott Specialty Gases Dual-Arialyzed Calzbration Statidard 

# 10 1290 COMBERMERE STREET,TROY,MI 48083 Phone: 248-589-2950 Fax: 24


## CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas
Assay Laboratory Customer P.O. No.: PAL AIR

— CUN

— SULTING & ENGINEERING SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES Project No.: 05-43082-008

. 1290 COMBERMERE STREET TROY,MI 48083 2106 E NW 67TH PLACE GAINESVILLE FL 32606 I nis certitication was pertorrned according to tf'A I raceability Protocol t-or Assay & Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards; Procedure G-1) September, 1997. Cylinder Number: ALM013029 Certification Date: 17May2006 Exp. Date: 16May2009 Cylinder Pressure***: 1950 PSIG ANALYZER READINGS (Z..=. ero Gas R Reference Gas T= est Gas r= orre atlon oe Iclent)

First Triad Analysis Second Triad Analysis:I .. Calibration Curve

Special Notes: REF:TQ06-1227 (ITEM 9 GAS MIX) 

### APPROVED BY: 

# ~ 

# A n

~ - 

### 911LARY THAT HLIR

# (, a i a q s 2 Ss

~

i/ t

~

, r 93'. 4O"i. ~ iCi— ~ I it ~ 

# ~ o~ n 4m- an I y, CD
C7J 

### yr
. _., . • ' m , . mC5r 67 ^~

~.~. ~ tr3 fS1 LO ClJ' 1...>

1~'-

.. ~y . w~w ; , r, ff? F ; 4)93- i i,, • u r R's4/ a rv ~s E s ~J U r`;. ' IuJ t Cli, x~u~ O N ml
co i Q'll g ~t ay r~ r:,.r

~ z ~ z ~ r " Q (3= - dK ck:z

_ ~ .

cm I r Q~ ff 0 )- C.U. -:

-45' f~A: ~~ . ~ ~ 1 •l7~ W / r? k t: ID _' /rl`f/r ➢ ~ V J 63 ~ CS31 l:._ O'll 0 O01 EEY ~ {. 1 »~ QW'V' l.r r v C3 EC C!f ' 61 t~J 00 rtR 1 ~F,— ru /`qr. Rr 1 ^6 t Y s ~/ a• / (~, £Fl ~Sr' 6{ rx 1:, l'W cr" E'Ff r N.F l k f4' 4~~:~/p'~ik^T'q'%l('~.'^' /S~/!° ~~'?: e~M ~^e~ u i ^ rt - . ^S

. ... .w «:.L~~. ...>....~~,.....~ ... ..~._ ,.:...., . I a
. e

# i m

Scott Specialty Gases Dual-Certdfied Calibration Standard

` one: ax: 

# CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: Reference Class Calibration Standard

Product Information Prolect

— ' — N

~ 

### i-49994-010 Item No.: 0102C5002820AL P.O. No.: PAL Cylinder Number: ALM004892 Cylinder Size: AL Certification Date: 15May2006 Expiration Date: 14May2009 

## CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION Component Name CARBON DIOXIDE CARBON MONOXIDE METHANE 

### PROPANE AIR 

## TRACEABILITY ' 

### Description

~ 

### :+.. Customer AIR CONSULTING & ENGINEERING SUITE #10 2106 NW 67TH PLACE GAINESVILLE, FL 32606



### c

APPROVED BY: DATE: 

### JOHN C.ITZ

Page 1 of 2

## SPECIFICATIONS 

# ~ r J

. Blend Blend 

### Process A;alytica4 Requested Gravimetric Anaiyzed Toierance Accuracy Accuracy Interlocking Concentration Concentration Concentration Result Result Result Result Component Name (Moies) (Moies) (Moles) (+/- %) (+/- %) (+/- %) (+/- %)
CARHON DIOXIDE 25,000. PPM 25,000. PPM 25,100. PPM .0 1.00 1.00 .40 CARHON MONOXIDE 9,000. PPy 9,010. PPM 9,030. PPM .1 1.00 1100 .20 METBANE 9,000. PLRM 9,010. PPM 9,000. PPM .1 1100 1.00 .10 PROPANE 3,000. PPM 3,000. PPM 2,990. PPM .0 1.00 1.00 .30 AIR 

## TRACEABILITY Process Traceabilitv Method GRAVIMETRIC BLENDING Anaivtical Traceabilit Type/SRM No. Ecpiration Date GMIS 3 COMP 14Jun2006 GMIS 3 COMP 14Jun2006 CH4/N2 2.5% 12Dec2007 C3H8/N2 .33% 23Ju12006 Instrumentation Instrument/Modei/Serial# MTI/M20 0/1 709 2 7 MTI/M20 0/1 709 27 MTI/M20 0/1 709 2 7 MTI/M200/170927 

### PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Cylinder Size: AL Traceability To NIST

Cviinder Number Concentration Component ALM066991 16.00 96 CARBON DIOXIDE ALM066991 7010. PPM CARBON MONOXIDE A11789 2.506 % METHANE K011239 3301. PPM PROPANE

Date Last Calibrated Anaivtical Princiole Anaiytical Method O1May2006 GC-TCD O1May2006 GC-TCD 15May2006 GC-TCD 15May2006 GC-TCD

Pressure: 2000 PSIG Expiration Date: 14May2009


## SPECIAL HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS Do not use or store cylinder at or beiow the stated dew point temperature. Possibie condensation of heavier components couid resuit. In the event the cylinder has been exposed to temperatures at or below the dew point, piace cylinder in heated area for 24 hours and then roil cyiinder for 15 minutes to re-mix. Use of caiibration standards at or below dew 'point temperature may resuit in caiibration error. 

## COMMENTS REP:TQ06-1227(ITEM 11 GAS MIX) DISCOUNT PER J.MUNLEY/D.HUDGEN ORIGINAL QUOTE @ $ 1600

Page 2 of 2

### :.-Concentration Accuracy (Moles) 

### 1.00 % 1 

### BALANCE .,r.

Traceability Type 

### :. Traceable To 

### 9ABILITY WEIGHT NIST LITY GAS S7ANDARDS: , SRS Component Name 

### METHANE AIR 

## TRACEABILITY

BLEND ANALY Descri tinn 

# Scott Specialty Gases 

# I_ 741 EASTON ROAD, BLDG 1, 

# 110U7o Calibration Standard

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: Reference Class Calibration Standard

Product Information Customer 

### roject No.: 01-4 994-004 Item No.: 01022713 OAL AIR CONSULTING & ENGINEERING P.O. No.: PAL SUITE #10 2106 NW 67TH PLACE Cylinder Number: ALMO26874 GAINESVILLE, FL 32606 Cylinder Size: AL Certification Date: 12May2006 Expiration Date: 11 May2009 

## CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION

I_177Ti]r197e?,fl 

## ~ ~ DATE: JOHN Y..FI 

## ~ Z



### Page 1 of 2

### Requested Concentration (Moles)
1. °a (



## ~

. 

## SPECIFICfaT10NS

N1N:L AIR 

### 1,00 r"i.° C' K ~ Blend
( O Blend Process Analytica9 Gravimetnc Analyzed Toierance Accuracy Accuracy Interiocking Concentration Concentration Result Resuit Result Result (Moles). (Moles) (+/- %) (+/- %) (+/- %)
1:00 % 0.99 .0 1.00 1.00 1.00


## 1 :314i

~ 

# y Process Traceabiiity Method GRAVIMETRIC BLENDING Analytical Traceability Type/SRM No. Expiration Date CH41N2 2.5% 12Dec2007 Instrumentation instrument/Modei/Seriai#

. MTI/M200/170927 

## PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Cyiinder Size: AL Traceability To NIST

Cylinder Number Concentration Component A11789 2.506 % 

### METHANE

Date Last Calibrated Analytical Principle Anaiytical Method 12May2006 GC-TCD

Pressure: 1660 PSIG Expiration Date: 11 May2009


## SPECIAL HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS Do not use or store cylinder at or below the stated dew point temperature. Possible condensation of heavier components could result. in the event the cylinder has been exposed to temperatures at or below the dew point, p(ace cylinder in heated area for 24 hours and then roll cylinder for 15 minutes to re-mix. Use of caiibration standards at or beiow dew point temperature may resuit in caiibration error. 

## COMMENTS REF:TQ06-1227 (ITEM 4 GAS MIX) FLAM-OX RESTRICTION:--1670 PSIA



# 1 Page 2 of 2

# 997~ C~ 

# im Scott Specialty Ga Dual-Analyzed Calzbration Standard
6141 EASTON ROAD, BLDG 1,PLUMSTEADVILLE,PA 18949-0310 Phone: 800-331-4953 Fax: 215-766-7226


## CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: EPA Protocol Gas Assay Laboratory Customer P.O. No.: PAL AIR CONSULTING & ENGINEERING SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES Project No.: 01-49994-005 6141 EASTON ROAD, BLDG 1 SUITE #10 PLUMSTEADVILLE,PA 18949-0310 2106 NW 67TH PLACE GAINESVILLE FL 32606 ANALYTICAL INFORMATION g ___...... , This certification was performed according to EPA Traceablhty ProLocol For "Assay & Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards; Procedure G-1; September, 1997. Cylinder Number: ALMO23042 Certification Date: O8May2006 Exp. Date: 07May2009 Cylinder

- Pressure***: 2Q00 P91G ANALY,T.ICAL COMPONENT CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION (Moles) ACCURACY* * TRACEABILITY CARBON DIO)CIDE 9,570.'

~ C~ PPM Direct NIST and'NMi 

## AIR BALANCE;
Do not use when cylinder,.`pressure is below 150 " Analytical accuracy is based on the requirements of EPA Protocol Procedure G7,-13eptember 1997. 

### REFERENCE STANDARD 

## ; TYPE/SRM N0. EXPIRATION DATE CYLINDER NUMBER ..' CONCENTRATION COMPONENT NTRM 2622 03Apr2007 ALMO24821 2 ; 008 % CARBON DIOXIDE
INSTRUMENTATION INSTRUMENTlMODEL/SERIAL# DATE LAST 6ALIBRATED s'ANALYTICAL PRINCIPLE MTI/M200/170927 01May2006, "`;' GC-TCD 

### ANALYZER READINC3S<> (Z=Zero Gas R=Reference Gas'- T=Test Gas "r=Correlation Coefficient)

First Triad Analysis Second Triad:Analysis Calibration Curve

CARBON DIOXIDE Date: 0SMay2006 Response Unit:AREA Ooncentration=A+Bz+Cx2+13z3+Ex4 Z1=0.00000 111=91499.00 T1=46100.00 r=.999983 2622 112=91647.00 22=0.00000 T2=46088.00

. ~ Constants: A=-6.1770E-03 Z3=0.00000 T3=46139.00 R3=91662.00 ~ 8=2.1776E-06 C= Avg. Concentration: 9970. PPM D= E_

Special Notes: ref:TQ 122 

## APPROVED BY: HN 0. -LTZ 

# ~~ '

## $PECIFICATIONS q 

## ~ ~ r~~ C~ alend Procesy ' Re uested

~ tirauq n~e t

.. ric Tolerance Accurac Concentration Concentratfon Result Result Component Name (Moles) (Moles) (+/- %) (+/- %)
CARHON DIOXIDE 4. °s 4.00 % .0 1.00 NITRCGEN

. BAL HAL

.

Process Traceability Method GRAVIMETRIC BLENDING 

## PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Cylinder Size: AL Traceability To NIST

Pressure: 2015 PSIG Expiration Date: 14May2008


## SPECIAL HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS Do not use or store cylinder at or below the stated dew point temperature. Possible condensation of heavier components could result. In the event the cylinder has been exposed to temperatures at or below the dew point, place cylinder in heated area for 24 hours and then roll cylinder for 15 minutes to re-mix. Use of calibration standards at or below dew point temperature may result in calibration error.



### Page 2 of 2

# /r`21

~ 

# ; . ~ 

# • . ~ ~ 

# / Dual-Certified Calibration Standard

CERTIFICATE OF ACCURACY: Reference Class Calibration Standard

Product Information Prolect ^ IVo.: 01-49994-007 Item No.: 010200004300AL P.O. No.: PAL Cylinder Number: ALM006827 Cylinder Size: AL Certification Date: 12May2006 Expiration Date: 11 May2008 

## CERTIFIED CONCENTRATION Component Name 

### ' CARBON DIOXIDE 

## AIR TRACEABILITY Description 

### BLEND PROCESS TRACEABILITY ANALYTICAL TRACEABILITY Customer AIR CONSULTING & ENGINEERING SUITE #10 2106 NW 67TH PLACE GAINESVILLE, FL 32606

Concentration Accuracy (Moles) (+/-%) 

### 50.1 PPM 1 

## BALANCE
Traceability Type Traceable To WEIGHT NIST 

## GAS STANDARDS SRS



# 1

~
~

~

~ j

~ 1 ~ 

## d
~ 

## Y 

# Scott speciaPiy Gases

A[R CON5ULilNG & ENGRING Certificate of Accuracy P0 No. 79P735 ~ 

### CA9 Reg, Component No. Camponent Certlffed ) 124-38=9 Anal ala CAR60N O(0X10E
~ 

### !c ' 132259•16-0 ~ 

### 50.1 PPM/ 9AL i A!R

-- 

### ------------------------- ---------•-•------•-

Analyala 0ate 23Ma 2008

y ProJect No 01-61928 

### Explratlon 0ate 23May2010 Analyst JOE 5MIiN

. Cylinder t ALM0068P7 Grade REPERENCE CLASS ttem No.010200004300AL

Raorder/5ervlce Contact

~ 

### 800)331-4953 PLUMSiEAOVtLLE PA 19949

APPROVED BY: DATE: NIKOLA OZNY

Page `1 of 2Cylinder Number ALM031683 Concentration 150.0 PPM Component

CARBON DIOXIDE 

## SPECIFICATIONS 5`' rI -" ~ Blend Process Analyticcl Requested Grav l Analyzed Tolerance Accuracy Accuracy Interlocking Co;Molesjion Resu lt (+ R /S U %) (+ R /S U %) (+ R /s u 53) Connnnt 

### ~ ration Co lMolesl ion

C'SFEOPi DIO%SDE 50, PPM 50.1 PPM 50.0 PPM 2 1.00 1.00 .10
AIR 

## TRACEABILITY Process Traceability Method GRAVIMETRIC BLENDING Analytical Traceability Type/SRM

~ No. Expiration Date CO2/N2 .015% 21Jun2006 Instrumentation Instrument/Model/Serial# SIEMENS/ULTRAMAT 6E/RB-236 

## PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Cylinder Size: AL Traceability To_ NIST

Date Last Calibrated Anal)dical Principle Anaiytical Method 12May2006 CO/CO2 ANALYZER

Pressure: 2000 PSIG Expiration Date: 11May2008


## SPECIAL HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS Do not use or store cylinder at or below the stated dew point temperature. Possible condensation of heavier components could result. In the event the cylinder has been exposed to temperatures at or below the dew point, place cylinder in heated area for 24 hours and then roll cylinder for 15 minutes to re-mix. 

### Use of calibration standards at or below dew point temperature may result in calibration ereor. 

## COMMENTS REF:TQ06-1227 (ITEM 8 GAS MIX) 

# f — (f Vg:P, 40



# ~ y ..~C~~ 

# t J _._. ~ 

# - ...,_v...

~ 

# .e..'-rr.e-

~ :~~ 

# h

_ ` peciaity Gases 

# ~

----- 

### AIR OONSULitNO G ENORINO Certifitatc of Accuracy Pd No. 782735 CAS Reg. Component ND, Camponent Csrt ff fed Anat sls 124-3B-9 CARBON DIOXIDE 50.1 PPM/ 132259•!0•a 81 R

...................................

... 

### BAL

Analysls Date 23May2B08 ProJect No 01 , 91$28 

### Explration Oate 23May2610 Analyat JOE SM[iH Cyllnder e AL0006827 Orade REfERENCE OLASS f tero No.6t0P000B4300AL

....,,., --------------°---- 

# ~f~ '< Reordbr/SePVice Cootaot 8@0)33! 4953 pLUMSTEiOVlLLE PA 16899 Y r : ~

# First Analytical Laboratories

ANALYSIS REPORT

Method 26A 

# Determination of Hydrochloric Acid and Hydrofluoric Acid

Project # 080609

Prepared for: Air Compliance Testing 5525 Canal Road Valley View, OH 44125
Reviewed and Approved by: ti1 wat

~ 

# -, William H. Wadlin, Ph. D. Laboratory Manager July 11, 2008 Do not reproduce this report except in whole without the permission of the laboratory.

1 of 22

# First Analytical Laboratories
CASE NARRATIVE Project #: 80704 Report Date: 11-Ju1-08 Client: Air Compliance Testing Client Project ID: 080609 Samples: Twenty-five samples were submitted for determination of hydrochloric acid and hydrofluoric acid by method 26A, one of which was the field blank. Two audit samples were included with this project. The samples were received in good condition with no apparent leakage. Any remaining amounts of the samples will be retained by the laboratory for six months and then discarded. Preparation: No sample preparation was required. A minimum dilution of 20X is required to prevent column saturation by the sulfate ion contributed by the 0.1 N sulfuric acid matrix. Analysis: HCl and HF were determined as chloride and fluoride respectively by Ion Chromatography with conductivity detection (IC). Results: The results are presented as total milligrams of HCl and HF trapped in the whole solution. HCl was measurable in seven of the twenty-four field samples, and ranged from just above the detection limit of 0.1 mg up to 5.8 mg. HF was found in only five of the twelve B series samples ranging from 0.5 mg to 2.3 mg. HF was found in all of the A series samples with levels from 5.5 mg to 335 mg. Quality Control: No HCl or HF were detected in the blank. All of the samples were analyzed in duplicate. The ending calibration was in good agreement with the initial calibration. The spike recoveries ranged from 97 % to 100 %, which is well within the normal range of 75 % to 125 %. The results for the audit samples are shown on the calculation worksheet.

2of22

# First Analytical Laboratories Tel. (919) 942-8607 FAX (919) 929-8688 

# ' 1126 Burning Tree Dr. Chapel Hill, NC 27517 www.firstanalytioaltabs.com



# ANALYSIS REPORT

, Project #: 80704 Report Date: 1 1-Ju1-08

Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc, Date Received: 08-Ju1-08 Client Project ID: 080609
Total Milligrams in Sample Sample HCI HF mg mg
080609A-BL-M26A 

## < 0.8 

## < 0.8 080609B-1-KO 

## < 0.3 1.7 080609B-1-IMP1 

## < 0.4 0.5 080609B-1-IMP2 

## < 0.3 

## < 0.3 080609B-1-IMP3 

## < 0.2 

## < 0.2 080609B-2-KO 

## < 0.5 2.1 080609B-2-IMP1 

## < 0.4 

## < 0.4 080609B-2-IMP2 

## < 0.3 

## < 0.3 080609B-2-IMP3 

## < 0.1 

## < 0.1 080609B-3-KO < 0.4 2.3 080609B-3-IMP1 0.7 0.7 080609B-3-IMP2 0.4 < 0.4 080609B-3-IMP3 

## < 0.1 

## < 0.1

QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY Spike, % Recovery 100% 98%

3 of 22l 1 

# • 

# Tou

Project #: 80704 Report Date: 11-Ju1-08 ' Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. Date Received: 08-1u1-08

Client Project ID: 080609

Total Milligrams in Sample Sample HCI HF mg mg
080609A-1-KO 5.8 303 080609A-1- IMP 1 0.4 26.2 080609A-1-IMP2 < 0.3 12.4 080609A-1-IMP3 0.1 10.6 080609A-2-KO 3.5 226 080609A-2-IMPI < 0.5 34.2 080609A-2-IMP2 < 0.4 10.8 080609A-2-IMP3 C 

## 0.1 5.5 080609A-3-KO 5.6 335 080609A-3-IMP1 < 0.3 27.2 080609A-3-IMP2 < 0.3 10.1 080609A-3-IMP3 < 0.1 7.4

QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY Spike, % Recovery 98% 97% Spike, % Recovery 99% 100%

4 of 22

## CHLORIDE IC ANALYSIS RUN SUMMARY AND CALCULATION WORKSHEET Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. MDL 

## = 0.1 mg/L Proj. #: 80704 Spike concentr'n 

## = 3.0 mg/L 

## ' Date: 10-Ju1-08

Sample ID Test Sample Peak Dil'n Total Client FAL Sol'n Volume Area Factor mg mg/L ml as HCI ACID IMPINGERS 080609A-BL-M26A 80704.6 0.02 408 0.37 20 

## < 0.82 080609B-1-KO 80704.B10 0.06 157 0.87 20 

## < 0.31 080609B-1-IMPI 80704.611 0.02 210 0.22 20 

## < 0.42 0806096-1-IMP2 80704.612 0.01 164 0.07 20 

## < 0.33 

## ' 080609B-1-IMP3 80704313 0.00 80 0.00 20 

## < 0.16

080609B-2-KO 80704.620 0.05 229 0.76 20 

## < 0.46 0806096-2-IMPI 80704.621 0.02 214 0.34 20 

## < 0.43 080609B-2-IMP2 80704.12122 0.05 170 0.76 20 

## < 0.34 080609B-2-IMP3 80704.B23 0.03 55 0.42 20 

## < 0.11 080609B-3-KO 80704.B30 0.05 204 0.77 20 

## < 0.41 080609B-3-IMPI 80704.631 0.15 232 2.22 20 0.71 080609B-3-IMP2 80704.1332 0.12 182 1.73 20 0.43 080609B-3-IMP3 80704.B33 0.08 72 1.18 20 

## < 0.14 080609A-1-KO 80704.A10 0.19 303 2.80 100 5.81 080609A-1-IMP1 80704.A11 0.12 158 1.77 20 0.38 080609A-1-IMP2 80704.Al2 0.06 170 0.86 20 

## < 0.34 Spike 80704.B10S 2.99 157 43.68 

## % Rec. 

## = 99.6% Spike 80704.Al2S 2.95 170 43.13 

## % Rec. 

## = 98.4%

Sample ID Test Sample Peak Dil'n Conc. Client FAL Sol'n Volume Area Factor mg/L mg/L ml of CI Audits M26A-3756-03 8070412728 9.61 500 140.35 40 7.47 M26A-3756-04 8070412752 9.60 500 140.28 40 7.47

5of22

### CHLARIDE IC ANALYSIS RUN SUMMARY AND CALCULATION WORKSHEET
Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. Proj. #: 80704 Date: 10-JuI-08


### QUALITY CONTROL DATA

Calibration Peak Area True conc. ppm Regression Blank 0.00 0.0 0.00 Standard 1 15.73 1.0 14.61 Standard 2 43.31 10 43.83 Standard 3 84.30 6.0 87.66 Standard 4 145.13 10.0 146.10 Standard 5 218.00 15.0 219.16 Standard 6 294.60 20.0 292.21 

### Regression Statistics R Square 0.99971 Intercept 0 Standard Error 1.863 X Variable 14.61 Observations 7

6 of 22

## FLUORIDE IC ANALYSIS RUN SUMMARY AND CALCULATION WORKSHEET Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. MDL = 0.1 mg/L ' Proj. #: 80704 Spike concentr'n = 3.0 mg/L

Date: 10-Ju1-08 Sample ID Test Sample Peak Dil'n Total Client FAL Sol'n Volume Area Factor mg mg/L ml as HF ACID IMPINGERS 080609A-BL-M26A 80704.B 0.00 408 0.00 20 < 0.82 080609B-1-KO 80704.610 0.53 157 12.54 20 1.67 08060911-1-IMPI 80704.1311 0.12 210 2.84 20 0.51 0806096-1-IMP2 80704.B12 0.00 164 0.00 20 < 0.33 08060913-1-IMP3 80704.1313 0.00 80 0.00 20 < 0.16 080609B-2-KO 80704.1320 0.46 229 10.70 20 2.08 080609B-2-IMP1 80704.621 0.08 214 1.84 20 < 0.43 080609B-2-IMP2 80704.622 0.00 170 0.00 20 < 0.34 080609B-2-IMP3 80704.1323 0.00 55 0.00 20 < 0.11 080609B-3-KO 80704.B30 0.56 204 13.11 20 2.27 080609B-3-IMP1 80704.631 0.15 232 145 20 0.68 080609B-3-IMP2 80704.632 0.08 182 1.78 20 < 0.36 080609B-3-IMP3 80704.1333 0.05 72 1.19 20 < 0.14 080609A-1-KO 80704.A10 10.00 303 235.10 100 302.9 080609A-1-IMPI 80704.A11 8.30 158 195.16 20 26.23 080609A-1-IMP2 80704.Al2 3.66 170 86.03 20 12.44 Spike 80704.B10S 3.47 157 81.66 %Rec. = 98.0% Spike 80704.Al2S 6.56 170 154.22 % Rec. = 96.7%

7of22

### FLUARIDE IC ANALYSI8 RUN SUMMARY AND CALCULATION WORKSHEET Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. Proj. #: 80704 Date: 10-Ju1-08
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Calibration Peak Area True conc. ppm Regression Blank 0.00 0.0 0.00 Standard 1 23.55 1.0 23.51 Standard 2 69.08 3.0 70.54 Standard 3 137.30 6.0 141.09 Standard 4 242.22 10.0 235.15 Standard 5 351.53 15.0 352.72 Standard 6 469.01 20.0 470.30 Regression Statistics R Square 0.99963 Intercept 0 Standard Error 3.407 X Variable 23.51 Observations 7

8of22

## CHLORIDE IC ANALYSIS RUN SUMMARY AND CALCULATION WORKSHEET Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. MDL = 0.1 mg/L Proj. #: 80704 Spike concentr'n = 3.0 mg/L Date: 11-Ju1-08 Sample ID Test Sample Peak Dil'n Total Client FAL Sol'n Volume Area Factor mg mg/L ml as HCI ACID IMPINGERS 080609A-1-IMP3 80704.A13 0.13 29 1.92 20 0.08 080609A-2-KO 80704.A20 0.15 234 2.18 100 3.51 080609A-2-IMP1 80704.A21 0.05 253 0.78 20 

## < 0.51 080609A-2-IMP2 80704.A22 0.04 174 0.65 20 

## < 0.35 080609A-2-IMP3 80704.A23 0.06 66 0.89 20 

## < 0.13 080609A-3-KO 80704.A30 0.21 266 3.08 100 5.63 080609A-3-IMPI 80704.A31 0.06 162 0.87 20 

## < 0.32 080609A-3-IMP2 80704.A32 0.04 165 0.58 20 

## < 0.33 080609A-3-IMP3 80704.A33 0.08 72 1.20 20 

## < 0.14 Spike 80704.A21 S 2.97 157 43.21 

## % Rec. 

## = 99.0%

QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Calibration Peak Area True conc. ppm Regression Blank 0.00 0.0 0.00 Standard 1 15.81 1.0 14.55 Standard 2 43.43 3.0 43.64 Standard 3 84.10 6.0 87.28 Standard 4 144.36 10.0 145.46 Standard 5 217.14 15.0 218.19 Standard 6 293.18 20.0 290.92 Regression Statistics R Square 0.99973 Intercept 0 Standard Error 1.786 X Variable 14.55 Observations 7

9 of 22

## FLUORIDE IC ANALYSIS RUN SUMMARY AND CALCULATION WORKSHEET Client: Air Compliance Testing, Inc. MDL = 0.1 mg/L Proj. #: 80704 Spike concentr'n = 3.0 mg/L Date: 11-1u1-08 Sample ID Test Sample Peak Dil'n Total Client FAL SoI'n Volume Area Factor mg mg/L ml as HF ACID IMPINGERS 080609A-1-IMP3 80704.A13 18.28 29 352.86 20 10.60 080609A-2-KO 80704.A20 9.66 234 186.40 100 226.0 080609A-2-IMP1 80704.A21 6.76 253 130.41 20 34.19 080609A-2-IMP2 80704.A22 3.11 174 60.00 20 10.82 080609A-2-IMP3 80704.A23 

### 4.17 66 80.53 20 5.51 080609A-3-KO 80704.A30 12.61 266 243.36 100 335.4 080609A-3-IMP1 80704.A31 8.38 162 161.84 20 27.17 080609A-3-IMP2 80704.A32 3.07 165 59.29 20 1014 080609A-3-IMP3 80704.A33 5.14 72 99.28 20 7.41 Spike 80704.A21 S 9.76 157 188.33 % Rec. = 100.0%

QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Calibration Peak Area True conc. ppm Regression Blank 0.00 0.0 0.00 Standard 1 20.93 1.0 19.30 Standard 2 59.09 3.0 57.91 Standard 3 113.46 6.0 115.81 Standard 4 196.66 10.0 193.02 Standard 5 287.07 15.0 289.54 Standard 6 386.53 20.0 386.05 Regression Statistics R Square 0.99977 Intercept 0 Standard Error 2.203 X Variable 19.30 Observations 7

10 of 22

# First Analytical Laboratories

1126 Burning Tree Dr. Chapef Hill, NC 27514 Tel. (919) 942-8607 FAX (919) 929-8688 

# -80704 Air Compliance Testing Project #: 080609 Date Shipped: 717/2008 PO# 42 3 ~ 

### Shipper: UPS Airbill #:

Page: 1 of 2 

# Chain of Custodv Record
Sam le # Run # Contnr. # Matrix" Comments Sam les s lit to: 080609B -1- M26A/KO 1 3 ^50 ml 0.1 N H2SO41 107 ml H20 Sam les were rro Vht priM to sh' ment 080609B -1- M26A/IMP1 1 3 '100 ml 0.1 N 1-12SO41 110 mi H20 080609B -1- M26A/IMP2 1 3 '100 ml O.iN H2SO4 / 64 ml H20 The contents of each im in er were recovered 080609B
- 1 - M26A/IMP3 1 3 80 mi H20 separately and should be anal zed and re ortetl se aratel . 080609B
- 2 - M26A/K0 2 3 '50 m10.1 N H2SO41179 ml H20 080609B -2- M26A/IMP1 2 3 •100 ml 0.1N H2SO4 / 114 ml H20 080609B -2- M26A/IMP2 2 3 '100 ml 0.1N H2SO41 70 ml H20 080609B -2- M26A/IMP3 2 3 55 ml H20 080609B -3- M26A/KO 3 3 '50 ml 0.1N H2SO4 / 154 ml H20 080609B-3• M26A/IMP1 3 3 '100 m10.1N H2SO4 / 132 ml H20 080609B -3- M26A/IMP2 3 3 '100 mi 0.1N H2SO4182 ml H20 080609B -3- M26AIIMP3 3 3 72 mi H20

' Re resents total sample volume 

### Anal ze ail sam Ies for HCI and HF as per section 11.1 EPA Method 26A

Notes: If questions contact: Relin uished e: Date: Rob Lisv 216.625.0900 x 232 Received e: Date: e ZOOA Tate Strickler 216.525.0900 x 235

Job Numbec 

### Air Compfiance Testing, Inc. 11 of 22 Date: (Method 26A.>us-First Analytical Labs BHt ) 7012008 Checked By:

# First Analytical Laboratories - 8 0 70 4

1126 Burning Tree Dr. Chapel Hill, NC 27514 Tel. (919) 942-8607 FAX (919) 929-8688 

# Chain of Custody Record Air Compliance Testing P 

### roject #: 080609 Date Shipped: 7/7/2 

### 008

_ 

## PO# _ 423



## _ Shipper: UPS

~ Airbill #:

Page: 2 of 2

Sam le # Run # Contnr. # Matrix' Comments 

### Sam les s lit to: 080609A -1- M26A/K0 1 3 '50 ml 0.1 N H2SO4 / 253 ml H20 Sam les were not s Ilt prior to shi ment 080609A-1- M26A/IMP1 1 3 •100 m10.1N H2SO4158 ml H20 080609A -1- M26A/IMP2 1 3 900 ml 0.1N H2SO4 / 70 ml H20 The contents of each im in er were recovered 080609A
- 1 - M26A/IMP3 1 3 29 mi H20 separately and should be anal zed and re orted se aratel . 080609A

- 2 -

M26A/K0 2 3 '50 ml 0.1 N H2504 1184 mI H20 080609A -2- M26A/IMP1 2 3 '100 m10.1N H2SO4 / 153 mi H20 080609A -2- M26A/IMP2 2 3 '100 ml O.1N H2SO4 / 74 ml H20 080609A -2- M26AlIMP3 2 3 66 ml H20 080609A -3- M26A/K0 3 3 '50 ml O.iN H2SO4 / 216 ml H20 080609A -3- M26A/1MP1 3 3 '100 ml o.1N H2SO4 / 62 ml H20 080609A-3-M26AlIMP2 3 3 '100 m10.1NH2SO4165mIH20 080609A -3- M26A/IMP3 3 3 72 ml H20 

## 080609A-BL- M26A Biank 6 '200 m10.1N H2SO4/208mIH20

'Representstotalsamplevolume 

### Anal zeallsam lesfor HCI and HF as per section 11.1 EPA Method 26A

Notes: If questions contact: Relin uished B: Date: Rob Lisy 216.525.0900 x 232 Received B:

. Date: Tate Strickler 216.525.0900 x 235

Air 

### Compliance Tesfing, lnc. 

### 12 of 22 (Method 26A.zls-first Malyticel Labs BH1) 7r7/2008 Jpb Number: 

### Date: Checked By:

### Method 26A Sample i2ecord of Gustody 6H1 

# ugm

ShippingRransporta4on Container Number:

Seal I.D. No. u8 ag kre Date Ttme Reason for Brealdng Seai Final Vol. mi

+(,() 200 ml 0.1 N 

### H2SOa / _„ ml H20 B 

### 080609B -1 - , 5 B 0806096 - 2- M28AIB#T(



### r - O S ~ ~' 200 m10.1 N 

### H2soa / 

### mi H20 B S B 0806096 - 3 - M26Al,9tif K,(f 

### S L ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 N H2SO4 1 / __-_mIH2O B 

## s B 080609B - 4- M26PJBH7 S 200 m10.1N 

### H2SOa t ml H20 B 

# s B 080609B - BL - M26A/BHt S 200 mf O.1N 

### H2SO4 / __ ml H20 B S B S B S B S B

' Were all seals intact?_,,,_Yes ^ No (Desoribe seal and reasoning in the "Remarks") Were ali liquid levels at marked leveis? Yes No (Estimate loss in the "Remarks") Received By Sample Custodian (Full Signature) (Date) Remarks:



### AirCompllance Testing, trtc. (Method 2eA.zls-Sampl¢ Record of Custody 8H7) 7l712008 

### Job Number: 

## ~
r e,, 

## ~ (e 

## ~ e 13 of 22 Done By / Date: 7 Final Check By I 

### Date: ~ 

### ! 7

## Method M26A Custody

- 

# 80704

~ ShippingRransportation Container Number: 

# I~ • • , , ,r 

### 1,1' 

# ~ /~~ 

# ~ t 

# ~ ~y~~ 

# ~ - . . . -. . 

# ~~ 

# ,:,!,.. ~ 

# I •

.:,.,.: 

# d ,:,.,•: ns!% 

# ~~ir7~~
,8+.,:. 1 - M26 

### A/ 

# IMP3



# ,:,.,.: , ,.. • ~ ~ ~ ~~ l 

## ~:~ /

~ ~ '' ' 

## 'IJ 7 ~~1,~~ M ~



## ~ ° r AiG 

## ~~ ~'~ I// • L 

## ~i[/~~T~iy~ '!,iT 

## ~ .iJ®. 

## ~

,:,.,.:

~
. 

# . - /♦



# !l

~~ li' ~~/~~

~ .,.,,. 

# ,;

~~

, 

# : , .+•: e.'! ~~.~,r.~~~~~~~
r' 

# ~~~

. ~ ~ A ~ 

# ~©~~
' I 

## ~

. ,:,.,.! + 

## ~~ !-' ~N '+s:. 

# ~ ~i~ rraf! ` . /k' 

# ~~~ ~~ 

# ~ .. 

# 11 ,:,.+:: , 1


# ~
+:,.,•: 

# ~i'~I%~i.+~~~ .7i + • C! 

# d,.>, 

# ~•~ ~~

i 

### ,',.,•': 3 M26A/IMP3+

,i,., • i : .A

Were ali seals intact? ` Yes _No (Describe seal and reasoning in the "Remarks") Were ail liquid leveis at marked levels?_Yes No (Estimate loss in the "Remarks") Received By Sample Custodian (Full Signature) (Date)

Remarks:

Air Compliance resting, Inc. (Method CTMO27 FOR GGERY M26A ROC.xis-Custatly) 7/212008 Job Number: 14 of 22 Date: Checked By:

## Method 26A Sample Record of Custody BH1 

# -80704

Shipping/Transportation Container Number:

Seai I.D. No. Fuli Si na e Date Time Reason for Breaking Seal Final Vol. ml 080609A-1 - M26A/814' 

### ~ - S



### . 2 

### H2SO4 / N ml H20 g 

### S B 080609A - 2- M26A ~ ~ 

### r 200 ml 0.1 N 

### H2so 4

~ 

### _ ml H2 0



### r B 080609A - 3- M26A/Jj4N
~ 

# 7 d ~ ~ x ~ ~ 2 H2 m soa i N 

### _ mt H20 S B 080609A - 4- M26A/BH4 S 200 ml 0.1N H2SO4 i 

### mi H20 B S 

### B 080609A - BL - M26A/BH1 

### S 200 ttd 0.1N 

### H2804 i 

### _ ml H20 B 

## s B S B 

## s B S 

### B Were all seals intact?_Yes ____,No (Describe seai and reasoning in the "Remarks") Were all Iiquid levels at marked levels? Yes No (Estlmate loss in the "Remarks") Received By Sample Custodian 

### (Full Signature) (Date) Remarks:

Air Compiiance Testing, Inc. 

### (Method 26A.xts-,Sample RacoTd of Custotly aH1) 7r7/2008 Job Number: 15 of 22 Done By / Date: 

### ~ / ~~ 

### Final Check By / Date: dfr

# Method M26A Custody

- 

# 8d70 4

.------ ShippingrTransportation Container Number:

i 

# ~~_ ~~~~ ~~®~''

~.I~~.. II

. ~f~4~•~~_~~~ ii~ }y~ `ri.y ,~/ 'l~ : ~

~

y r ~ ~ i ~ 

### • ~ l~/ il/~~' i~'/ .~r4~111/:~t~~';L~ J ~ I ©'~~ ~ll_~~~A~i~~t 0:0609,A •

~ r:~~~►~~~~~ ,:,.,:. M... ) . e►;~~~~~,_,:•.~■~~~ ~~

,:..,.. . ©r~.~ r.~s~.~~~/~►!.~® t:'r~®~~''

~ A®_ 1:1609• ~2 6AAMP1~~~~~u

~~~~ ~/ ~~~®~~'..

~~ 

### I:~CIr' I1•. ~~/ .:,.r•, ►~iiri~~~~y~n.;

. .

~ ,:r.,.. !:.. ~i r:~~r~a+►~;. -?:~~~~,~,n~® 1•0611. 3

. ,:r.,.A , / ;2 ,:,.,;A( M26AIIMP3

, , ; • . : L

Were al/ seals intact?_Yes _No (Describe seal and reasoning in the "Remarks") Were all liquid levels at marked levels?

— Yes No (Estimate loss in the "Remarks") Reoeived By Sample Custodian (Full Signature) (Date)



### Remarks:

Job Number: Air Compliance Testfng, inc. 16 Gf 22 Date: (Melhotl CTMO27 FOR GGERY M26A ROC.xIaCustotly) 712/2008 Checked By: G-J

~ '

# ' 

# OF 1 NC 275 4-07



# -,",", 

# ~ ' GIIkBl91111 : • ., TATE STRICKLER 

### (216) 525•0900 235 AIR COMPLIANCE TESTING INC 5525 CANAL RD CLEVEl.AND OH 44125



## SHIP TO: MIKE BARRY (919)942-8607 

## FIRST ANALITICAL LABORATORIES 11624-C N. HWY. 15-501 

# CHAPEL HILL NC 27517 

# UPS NEXT DAY AIR 

# ~ TRACKING #: 1Z FR8 740 014083 7262



## BILLING: P!P

N5 ,UD..> CeimnN,NDi8.0A Wi'ltl8 Fokl here amf phice in labet poucfi



### 17 of 22

## FROM: TATE STRICKLER (216) 525-0900 235 AIR COMPLIANCE TESTING INC 5525 CANAL RD 

### CLEVELAND OH44125 

# __..__._....__.___._..__..___ _..

12 LBS 1 OF 1


# -8070 4

SHIP TO: MIKE BARRY (919) 942-8607 FIRST ANALITICAL LABORATORIES 11624-C N. HWY. 15-501 

# CHAPEL HILL NC 27517 

# '°' • i N t: 275 4-01



# • O 

# • . • II
~~ 

# IIIIIII
~ 

# III
~ 

# IIIII ~ . ~~.~. UPS NEXT DAY AIR 

# ~ TRACKING #: 1Z FR8 740 014024 5053 

# pl IIIIII

~~ 

# IRIII

~ 

# IIIIIII

mr

~ 

# xmrt

~ 

# F:i,::rr:

FoW here and place in Sabet pouch



### 18 of 22

# ~

June 17, 2008 Requestor: Bryon Richwine 

## PA Dept. of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air Quality 2575 Interstate Drive 

## Harrisburg, PA 17101 

## 717-346-8252 Dear Bryon Richwine: Eastern Research Group (ERG) have been directed by the U.S. EPA to provide you withtwo ampules of the following audit materials for a Method 26A HCI audit; Numbers M26A3756-03 and -04. These audit samples are for an uncoming audit at Gien-Gery Corp., Hanley Plant in Summerville, PA and are being sent directly to Michael Rixner of Glen-Gery Corp., Hanley Plant in Summerville, PA per your automated database request. Please note: requests for Method 26A are now filled separately from requests for Method 26 and that there are NEW Instructions associated with these samples, effective October 2003. Method 26A request M26A-3756-03: 

## - one Method 26A HCl sample; Sample No. L- 2728 request M26A-3756-04: 

## - one Method 26A HCl sample; Sample No. L- 2752 Please note that each sample is individually labeled and shipped with an instruction sheet with the format for reporting the laboratory audit results. All results are to be reported to the internet automated computerized database. You are urged to instruct the laboratory to analyze the audit samples along with the designated field samples. The audit sample should be analyzed as a routine field sample according to the speci$cations of the Test Method and using the supplied instruetions. The audit results are to be reported to you, the reguestor, by the analyst, using the Reporting Form, in the units specified in the instructions. You then will use the automated database to enter the results into the SSAP database. We would like to thank you for your participation in the Stationary Source Audit Program. if you have any questions regarding the samples, please contact either Thomas Mekenzie at (919) 468-7920 or myself at (919) 468-7928. My fax number is (919) 468-7803. Sineerely,



## Rick Lafleur CC: sent with samples

601 Keystone Pa.rk prive, Suite 700, Morrisville, NC 27560° Phone (919) 468-7800 ° Fax (919) 468-7803 ° Arlingfon,VA ° Atlanta, GA ° Austin,TX ° Boston, MA • Chantilly,VA ° Cincinnati, OH ° Hershey, PA Kansas City, KS ° Lexington, MA ° Nashua, NH ° Research Triangle Park, Moi

- i
- isville, NC ° Sacramento, CA Eqval OpPnnunity EmplOycr • Prirried on fte<y<lad Peper

# -80704

FOR THE PREPARATION AND ANALYSIS OF METHOD 26A AUDIT SOLUTION
es This audit sample corresponds to the Method 26A Container No. 3 aqueous sam rred to as the aeid sample or hydrogen hatidtr_s fra 'on. There is no filter included w audit solution, and there is no audit solution for the Container No. 4 alkaline sample

ampule you received contains approximately 20 mL of an aqueous mixture of water that

~ 

## d with a low concentration of chloride. ) Wrap a paper towel around the ampule, and with the anipule in the upright position, break of: op at the pre-scored mark by carefally exerting pressure sideways. ;) Pipette exactly 10 mL ofthe audit sample from the ampule into a 500 mL volumetric flask. Di :xactly to the 500 mL mark with DI water and mix well. (This is called the Diluted Sample.) 1) Analyze the Diluted Sample in accordance with the procedures in Section 11.1 of Method ~ 

## lYote: The Diluted Sample may require further dilution with DI water to bring it within alibration range ofthe analytical instrament. This decision is left to the analyst.) 1) Calculate the concentration ofchloride in the Diluted Saniple in mg/L the chloride concentration in the Di luted Sampleon the enclosed Reporting Form
Report the Method 26A chloride concentration, in the Diluted Sample on the Reporting

Revised 10103 

### 19 of 22

# -60704 Method 26A Audit Material (CI- Spiked Aqueous Solution) REPORTING FORM: To be compieted by laboratory
Request Number/Sample Number: 

### M26A-3756-03/L2728 Date Issued: 

### 06/17/08



### Auditee: Company: Address: 

# I( 2(0 ~u~ 

# rlirlR '(ree U

~ 

# • CHr ~i~E~ 

# h{lu .275t7
Attention of: Phone: , 

# 1I f 1 1 +Z 

# 8607
Requestor: Agency: PA Dept, of Environmentai Protection, Bureau of Air Quaitiy Address: 2575 Interestate Drive, Harrisburg, PA 17101 Attention of: Bryon Richwine Phone: 717-346-8252 Project Name: Gien-Gery Corp., Hanley Pfant 

### Audit Results (Resutts In mg/L) Analyte Result Chloride concentration 

# 7.47



# ~

Revised 10/03 

### 20 of 22

## -6 

# 07p4

FOR THE PREPARATION AND ANALYSIS OF METHOD 26A AUDIT SOLUTION
t; This audit sample corresponds to the Method 26A Container No. 3 aqueous saml m - ed to as the acid sample or 6ydfogen halicle ~ 

## fract

~ 

## . T3 ere is no 61ter included wi audit solution, and there is no audit solution for the Container No. 4 aZkal'

~ 

## e sample

arnpule you received contains approximately 20 mL of an aqueous mixture of water that -d with a low concentration of chloride. 1) Wrapa paper towel around the ampule, and with the ampule in the upright position, break of op at the pre-scored mark by carefully exerting pressure sideways. >_) Pipette exactly 10 mL ofthe audit sample from the ampule into a 500 mL vo lumetric flask. D ;xactly to the 500 mL mark with DI water and mix well. (This is called the Diluted Samp le.) 3) Analyze the Diluted Sample in accordance with the procedures in Section 1 l.l of Method : ,l_ V2tr. The Diluted Sample may require further dilution with DI water to bring it within ;alibration range ofthe analytical instrument. This decision is left to the analyst.) 4) Calculate the concentration ofchloride in the Diluted Sample in rng/L. i) Record the chloride concentration in the Diluted Sample on the enclosed Reporting Form in t )f mg/L. 5) Report the Method 26A chloride concentration, in the Diluted Sample on the Reporting Fc o the designated agent.

Revised 10103 

### 21 of 22

# .80704 Method 26A Audit Material (CI- Spiked Aqueous Solution) REPORTING FORM: To be completed by laboratory
Request Number/Sample Number: M26A-3756-04/t.2752 Date Issued: 06/17/08



### Auditee: Company: 

# FI f 

# S4 

# R n a W i ca lt-a h 

# s
Address: 

# 1 t` 26 Da f 

# n t ✓ t 

### 9, 

# "rr ez U F 60ft-` L- III2 7 L
Attention of: 

# 9• (0 a 

## d1 1 Vt 

### Phone: 

# 919 14 2- N 

# 0
- ]
Requestor: Agency: PA Dept, of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air Qualtiy Address: 2575 Interestate Drive, Harrisburg, PA 17101 Attention of:.- Bryon Richwine Phone: 717-346-8252 

### Proje¢t Nante: Glen-Gery Corp., Hanley Plant
Audit Results (Results in mg/L) Analyte Result Chloride concentration 

# 7. 'I / 

# 09- '`t 

# l o g 4""

Revised 10103 

### 22 of 22

# ~
w w w. e r g. c o m 

## June 17, 2008 IYequestor: Bryon Rictrwine PA Dept. of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air Quality 2575 Interstate Drive Harrisburg, PA 17101 

## 717-346-8252 Dear Bryon Richwine: Eastern Research Group (ERG) have been directed by the U.S. EPA to provide you with ampules of audit rnaterials for a Method 08 audit pair; Audit Numbers M08-3756-01a and - Olb. These audit samples are for an upcoming audit at Glen-Gery Corp., Hanley Plant in Summerville, PA and are being sent directly to Michael Rixner of Glen-Gery Corp., Hanley Plant in Summerville, PA per your automated database request.

Method 08 Sulfur Dioxide: request M08-3756-01a: 

## - one each Sulfuric Dioxide audit sample; Sample No. G- 0523 Method 08 Sulfuric Acid Mist: request M08-3756-01b: 

## - one each Sulfuric aeid mist audit sample; Sample No. H- 0895 Please note that each sample is shipped with an instruction sheet and a data form for listing the analytical audit information. All results are to be reported by the requestor to the internet automated eomputerized database. You are urged to instruct the laboratory to ana1yze the audit sample along with the designated field samples. The audit sample should be analyzed as a routine field sample according to the specifications of the Test Method and using the supplied instructions. The audit results are to be reported 

## to vou, the reguestor in the units specified in the instructions. You then wiii use the automated database to enter the results into the SSAP database. We woUld like to thank you for your participation in the Stationary Source Audit Program. If you have 

## any questions concerning the audit, please contact either Thomas Mckenzie (919) 468-7920 or myself at (919) 468-7928. My fax number is (919) 468-7803.
Sincerely, 

# T --/-'—.

Rick Lafleur 

## CC: sent with audit samples

601 Keystone Park Drive, Suite 700, Morrisville, NC 27560• Phone (919) 468-7800 • Fax (919).468-7803 • Arlington,VA • Atlanta, GA • Austin,TX • Boston, MA • Chantilly,VA ° Cincinnati, OH • Hershey, PA Kansas City, KS • L.exington, MA • Nashua, NH • Research Triangle Park, Mori
- isville, NC • Sacraroento, CA Equal Opportunity Employer • Printed on Recycled Paper

## Method 8 Audit Material (Sulfuric acid mist Spiked Aqueous Solution)
' 

# REPORTING FORM: To be completed by laboratory

Request Number/Sample Number: M08-3756-01b/H0895 Date Issued: 06117/08



### Auditee: Company Address: 

## ,L'} ~'~ 

## ro7( „zD-j7a yiv,:.,.oY
~ 

## y Attention of: Phone: 

## 9/,-,52-5

- - r',lpC?
Requestor: Agency: PA Dept. of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air Qualtiy Address: 2575 Interestate Drive, Harrisburg, PA 17101 Attention of: Bryon Richwine Phone: 717-346-8252 u Project NafTle: Glen-Gery Corp., Hanley Piant
Audit Results (Results in mg H 2 SO 4 / dscm) Analyte Result Sulfuric acid mist ;e ) • 

# ~ -

Revised 8121/02

# Method 8 Audit Material 

# (Sulfur Dioxide Spiked Aqueous Solution) REPORTING FORM: To be compieted by Iaboratory


### Request Number/Sample Number: M08-3756-01 alG0523 

### Date Issued: 06/17/08

Auditee: 

### Company 

## w9

~ 

## rrryj
~~ 

## x nva Tn,l%7 ~~~ ~vre 

### Address: 

## 40 A,!Ol ° 9- ~ 

### Attention of: 

## 7 rz
~ 

## ,r:7 Phone: 

## ~~s~ 

## _ plp g
Requestor: 

### Agency: PA Dept. of Environmentai Protection, Bureau of Air Qualtiy 

### Address: 2575 Interestate Drive, Harrisburg, PA 17101 

### Attention of: B ryon Richw 

### ine Phone: 717-346 

### -8252 Project Nanle: Glen-Gery Corp., Hanley Plant


### Audit Results (Results in mg S0 2 / dscm) Analyte Result 

### Sulfur Dioxide 

## ,3q3`
~ 

## .--•

Revisetl 8121102ti 

### c oi 

## C «

~ 

### N U C ~ 4 E O U

~ Q



### ~~ ~ 

### ° °) ao ~ ~ M 0 0 O O 

### 00 M O O O 6 O ~ 

### O N O p ~ 

### M O N `- Y'7 O p 

## O ~ M 

## N O 

### ~ 

### p. - O



## E E E E E E E 

# E E E E E N "O

~ 

# E m E E E ~ 

# E m E E E O W~0~ c O 0 )CNO 

### ~ c 

### OO O (nN OO ~ 

## O O N O ~ 

### S(n N v O O Cn ~ 

### N i N= p N 02 

## .-.

~ 

## • G N ~7 ~ O~ 

## •-.._ C

~ 

### +-' U V "`' ~ ~ 

### ""' U 

## V ' "' N ~ ~ O



### V O ~ ~



### U

- O O



### U O o w m

g N 

### c0N N C O ~ m 

### O 0 • C O

- 

### X m~ ~ 

### m fl. Q



# v c c U 

### ~ a

~ 

## E O 

## c E m~ C? (.j 

## m m m c• O ) , 

### ~ v~i 

## 0 U) N ^ O N C,4



## 0 ~



### =



## ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o 

# 0 O ~ 

# o p ° _= 00200 o o 0-m> E E o-m> E 

# °s E E
n 

# o 0 E 11 

### 0



## ~ 

# jj

~ 

# > > @u

o s 

## ~ 

# p n ~ > O O t6

1- 

## > tl! ! 

## O 11 

## 'a+ ~ 

## > C
~ > c ~ 

## O > a Z ~ 

## O ~ 

### Z 

## C 

# V = u o z ~ z v d 

### c C O 

### O V

~ 

# _ = O N



# y a H

~ 

## ~ W I.- 

## H J M tLl

~ 

### 0 W

~ .1 F a- W 0 O 

### N a

~ m 0 

## HNumber of Test Runs 3 Traverse Points F 12 Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 __41.80 ._..-_ ~

41. . 80 . ..

41.80 41.70 0.84 41-70

0.84

_ 41.70 0.84 28.90 28.80 28.83 20.00 20.00

_ _ 20.00'. ~ 26.00 28.00

_ 28.00'.. 681.395

_ 742.563i804.668'', 741.830 804.344

_ 866.270'. 0.9988 ~ 0.9988 0.9988''. _ 2.016

90 2.016

--- yp 2.016''. °---- 90 -. 106.5 103.5 107.2

_ 12.21 13.9 12.4 1.00 1.00 1.00

_ 17.00 82.00i_ 16.50

82.50 ~ 16.83

82.17 Glen Gery Ceric Kiln uncontrolled InletDUCt

Av~ 41.80 41.70 0.84 28.84 20.00 28.00

0.9988 2.016 90 105.7 12.8
1.00 16.78 82.22 Comol'anoe Stack E'ss'on Teet Report

TEST DATA

Stack Cross-Sectional Diameter 1 (circular) (in) Stack Cross-Sectional Diameter 2 (circular) (in)

Pitot Tube Coeffcient (Cp) Barometric Pressure at Ground Leve l (Pbar) (in Hg) Elevation Difference Between Ground Level and Meter Box Locations (ft) Elevation Difference Between Ground Level and Sampling Locations (ft) Initial Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft3) Final Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft3) Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor (Gamma) Dry Gas Meter Calibration Coefficient (Delta H@)

Total Sampling Run Tlme (Thela) (min) Volume of Water Vapor Condensed in the Impingers (g) Weight of Water Vapor Collected in Silica Gel (g) Air Percent by Volume Carbon Dioxide in Stack Gas (Dry Basis) (%CO2)

Air Percent by Volume Oxygen in Stack Gas (Dry Basis) (%02) Air Percent by Volume Nitrogen in Stack Gas (Dry Basis) (%N2) Average Pitot Rotation Angle Port Number 1 -- 2.2 Port Number Test Run Start Time (hrmin) 15:45 ~ 19:48 Test Run Stop Time (hrmin) _ _14:19 18:53 21:33

DETAILED RESULTS Stack Gas Conditions Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Stack Cross-Sectional Area (A) (ft2) 9.507 9.507 9.507 9.507 Barometric Pressure at Sampling Location (in Hg) 28.87 28.77 28.80 28.82 Dry Molecular Weight of Stack Gas (Md) (Ib/Ib-mole) 28.84 28.82 28.83 28.83 Wet Molecular Weight of Stack Gas (Ms) (Ib/Ib-mole) 27.85 27.85 27.85 27.85 Average Absolute Stack Gas Pressure (Ps) (in Hg) 28.86 28.76 28.79 28.80 Average Stack Gas Static Pressure (ps) (in H20) -011 -0.19 -0.18 -0.16 Average Stack Gas Temperature (ts) (°F) 373.8 377.4 376.2 375.8 Average Stack Gas Temperature (Ts) (°R) 833.8 837.4 836.2 835.8 Average Stack Gas Velocily (Vs) (fUsec) 53.89 53.44 53.73 53.68 Average Stack Gas Velocity (Vs) (ft/min) 3,233 3,206 3,224 3,221 Wet Volumetric Stack Gas Flow at Actual Conditions (Qaw) (acfm) 30,739 30,481 30,647 30,622 Wet Volumetric Stack Gas Flow at Standard Condilions (scfm) 18,779 18,472 18,620 18,624 Dry Volumetric Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (Qstd) (dscfm) 17,064 16,814 16,933 16,937 Percent by Volume Moisture as measuretl in Stack Gas (%H20) 9.13 8.98 9.06 9.06
Test Results Volume of Dry Gas Sampled at Slandard Conditions (Vmstd) (dscf) 55.688 56.131 56.607 56.142

Rate of Dry Gas Sampled at Standard Conditions (dscfm) 0.619 0.624 0.629 0.624 Predicted 1-Hour Sample Volume Based on Current Sampling Rate (dscf) 37.125 37.421 37.738 37.428 Dry Mole Fraction of Flue Gas (Mfd) (1-bw/100) 0.909 0.910 0.909 0.909 Average Velocity Pressure (Delta P) (in H20) 0.5442 0.5317 0.5383 0.5381

Average Square Root of Delta P 0.7369 0.7277 0.7326 0.7324 Average Pressure Differential of Orifice Meter (Delta H) (in H20) 1.4733 1.5792 1.6333 1.5619 Average DGM Temperature (tm) (°F) 94,500 100.583 94.917 96.667 Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature (Tm) (°R) 554.500 560.583 554.917 556.667 Volume of Metered Gas Sample (Vm) (dry) (acf) 60.435 61.781 61.602 61.273

Posl-Test Calibralion (Yqa) 0.9969 1.0171 1.0313 1.0151 Post-Test/Pre-Test Calibration Factor Difference (%) 0.19 -1.83 -3.25 -1.63
SAMPLING QA Current Predicted Allowable Post-Test Leak Rate (tlscfm) 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.020 Currenl Sampling Rate Status OK OK OK Probe Nozzle Diameter (in) -- 0.253L 0.252 0.253 0.253 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate (% 1) 98.7 101.8 101.1 100.6

In Field Isokinetic QA GOOD GOOD GOOD Count of Velocity Pressure Readings Below 0.05 in H20 0 0 0 0 Sensilivity Factor for Differential Pressure Gauge (T) 1.005 1.005 1.005 1.005 Is Meter Box Manometer Adequate (Yes / No) 7 YES YES YES

Test Date: 6124/2006 - 6125/2008 Page 1 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 080609

### Point

Count 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 

## 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Run # 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 

## 1 1 1 

## 2 2 2 2 2 

## 2 2 

## 2 2 2 

## 2 2 3 3 3 

## 3 3 3 

## 3 3 3 3 

## 3 3 Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen Gery Ceric Kiln Uncontrolled 

### MEASURED DATA FROM TEST RUNS Inlet Duct



### Run Pitot Delta Time P (in Square

Root of Delta P 0.787 0.800 0.762 0.735 0.714 0.693 0.748 0.755 0.714 0.742 0.714 0.678 0.678 0.775 0.806 0.728 0.700 0.686 0.707 0.806 0.742 0.721 0.728 0.656 0.762 0.781 0.728 0.700 0.693 0.700 0.742 0.775 0.755 0.794 0.700 0.663 Orifice DGM Stack Delta H Temp Pressure Stack (in H20) OUT (°F) (in H20) Temp (°F) 1.67

~ 

### 89 -0.12 1 - 375 1.73 91 -0.12 369 1.57 93 -0.12 375 1.46 1.38 94

94 -0.1

-0.1 366

373 1.3 95 -0.1 365 1.51 94 -0.1

~ 

### 379 1.57 95 -0.16 374 1.38 96 _-0.1 380 1.49 1.38 97

98 4.11 -0.14 374

381 1.24 98 -0.1 374 1.25 98 -0.29 376 1.62 99 '-0.24 376 1.77 1.44 101

102 -0.14

-0.19 372

380 1.33 103 -0.17 374 1.36 103 -0.16 380 i.61 98 -0.29 386 2.08 100 -0.15 378 1.76 100 -0.19 368 1.66 101

_ -0.18 379 1.7 101 -0.18 384 1.38 101

~ - 

### 0.1 376

J 

### 1.6 95 -0331 , 349 

## 1.7 96 -0.23 379 1.5 97 -0.24 385 1.4

~ 

### 1.3 97

96 JLL 

### -0.17 -0.14 379

~ 

### 384 1.4 96 -0.18 377 1.7 1.9 93

94 - -0.17 -0.16 381

375 1.9 94 .0.141 381 2.1 m 94
_._._._ -0.12 

# ___. 352 1.6
_..., 94 -0.11 ----__m 386

, 

## 1.5 93 386

Test Date: 6/24/2008 - 6/25/2008 Page 2 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 

### - 080609CJ W



### c
~ (O , V (O O 

# I cmN

W N O 

### <M 

# O O O

M tn W 7 ~ C V V' (O O

~ O M O

~ t n O O O

O

N V CD V ~ 

### c O M (O O
~ <t N O

~ 

### M O 66

O

~ r r 00 r C oJ M (O O 

### 3 M N — O
~ M O 66

O O O W 

### O ti

~ 

### O1 C q F N G U G
~ Q

~ 

## U

~ 'q



### N G J C 

# m V 

# N o a J p tll ~ 

## c ro

o c 

### N 1 ' 0 ~ 0 ~ ro

C 

### W ro 0



## co m 

# a m a U @ ro 

### ro ro (D
LL. Q N .V N ~~ tL ~ N 

### W Z (6 N 

### LL M ro 

# m n. C Y"

~ 

# U ro ~ o ~ a c ~ 

### r ~ O ~

> ~ N ~ 

# m ~ U U ro ro a a



### ~ O O 

### N N N ~ W O 

### N N

~ 

### N 

# m

~ N F 

### N h
V1 3 W N

~ 

### d 

### W Q C 

## O

N 

### W E

~ 

### o W

# FF $0300 0192 23400

0,150 _ 26600

0.212

[ 0000

. ) 0,000 1 0.000

b.61 3.5t o.b'3

HF Volume of Imoinper 1 Sample (VsHF) (mi) _ 3160

_ 5060

_ 3240 3820.000 HF Concentration of Sample, (S)( - )(mg F/ L) 8.300

~ ~ 6,757
~ 8.385 7,814 HF Concentration of Blank (BX )(mg F/ L) ! __

_ 0,000

-_0,000

-_0.000,J 0.000 HF Mass in Impinger 1 sample, (mHF) (mg) 26.23 34.19 27.17

HF Mass in Impinger 2 sample, (mHF) (mg) 12.44 10.82 10.14 HF Volume of impinoer 3 Sample (VsHF) (mi) 580.0 1320.0 1440.0 1113.3 HF Concentration of Sample, (SX )(mg F/ L) 18.28

_ 4.2

__ 5.1 9.2 HF Concentration of Blank (BX ) (mg F ! L) ~ _ 0_00_

_ 0.00 ,

~ - 0.00 0.00 HF Total Mass in sample, (mHF) (mg) 10.60 5.51 7.41 7.84 HCI Total Mass in sample, (mHCI) (mg) 352.17 276.52 380.14

HCI Collection Efficiency (%) 96.99 98.01 98.05 HF Concentralion, d ry basis (ConcHF) (mg/dscm) 223.33 173.97 237.15 211.48

HF Concentration (pprrNd) D ry @ 68F 268.516 209,166 285.132 254,271 HF Concentralion (ppmvw) Wet @ 68F 243.994 190.390 259.300 231.228 Stack Gas Concentration HF Volume of ImninOer 2 Sample (VsHF) (ml) 3393.333 3400 3480 3300 HF Concentration of Sample, (SX )(mg F/ L) 3.281 HF Concentration of Blank (BX )(mg F/ L) 0.000 3.660 3.110 __ 3_072 0.000 m 0.000
~ 0.000 Glen Gery Ceric Kiln Uncontrolled Inlot Ducl

Average 0.233 13,425

Averege 26766,667 0.185 0.000 Compliance Stack Emission Test R pon

TEST DATA DETAILED RESULTS Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Emission Results: Hytlrogen Chloride (HCI) Emission Rate (Ib/hr) 0.268 0,178 0,255 Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) Emission Rate (Ib/hr) 14.275 10.957 15.042
LAB RESULTS HCL Samule antl Calculation Data Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 HCI Volume of Knock Out Sample (VsHCI) (ml) HCI Concentration of Sample, (SX)(mg CI / L) HCI Concentration of Blank (BX ) (mg CI / L) HCI Mass in Knock Out sample, (mHCI) (mg) HCI Volume of Impinoer 1 Sample (VsHCI) (ml) HCI Concentration of Sample, (SX)(mg CI / L) HCI Concentration of Blank (BX
- ) (mg CI / L) HCI Mass in Impinger 1 sample, (mHCI) (mg) HCI Volume of imoinaer 2 Sample (VsHCI) (mi) HCI Concentration of Sample, (SX)(mg CI ! L) HCI Concentration of Blank (BX) (mg CI ! L) HCI Mass in impinger 2 sample, (mHCI) (mg) 3160 5060 3240 0.100 0.100 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.38 0.51 0.32 3400T 3480 3300 0.100 0.100 0.100 0,000 u 0.000 0.000 0.34 0.35 0.33 3820.000 0.107 0.000

3393.333 0.100 0.000

HCI Volume of Imoinoer 3 Sample (VsHCI) (ml) HCI Concentration of Sample, (SX )(mg CI / L) HCI Concentration of Blank (8)( - )(mg CI / L) HCI Mass in impinger 3 sample, (mHCI) (mg) HCI Total Mass in sample, (mHCI) (mg)

HCI Coilection Efflciency ( % ) 0.13 0.10
~ 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.13 U.14 6.60 4.50 6.43 98.86 100.00 100.00

1,577 1.589 1.603 4.19 2.83 4.01 2,762 1.866 2,647 2.510 1.699 2.407 Stack Gas Concentration Volume of Dry Gas Sampled at Standard Conditions (Vmstdm) (dscm) HCI Concentration, dry basis (ConcHCl) (mg/dscm)

HCI Concentration (ppmvd) Dry @ 68F HCI Concentralion (ppmvw) Wet @ 68F 1113.3 0.1 0.00 0.12

1,590 3.68 2,425 2.205
LAB RESULTS HF Samnle and Calculation Data

HFVolume of Knock Out

Sample (VsHF) (ml) HF Concentration of Sample, (SX HF Concentration of Blank (BX Run 1 Run 2 Run 3

30300 23400 26600 9.997 9.658 12.610 

### 0.000 0.000

_ 0.000_~ Average

26766.667 0.755 0.000 HF Mass in Knock Out sample, (mHF) (mg) 302.90 -
~ - 226.00 335,43

Tesl Date: 6124/2008 - 6/25/2008 Page 4 Air Compliance Testing, /nc. - 080609Glen Gery Cedc Kiln Uncontrolletl Inlet Duct Compl'ance Stack Emission Test Reoort



### EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 26A Nomenclature and

Sample Calculations Run No.

- 

### 1
Constants CO2F m = 44.0 in wg= 0.073529 NO z F„. t = 46.01 HCIF„ 1 = 36.46

O z F m = 32.0 gr= 0.000142857 COF„ i = 28.01 SO z F,., t = 64.06 CON z F,= 28.0 mmBtu= 1000000 Btu H i SO a F, W = 98,08 HF F, x = 20.01 H B OF,= 18.0 CF,= 12.011 T„d= 528 P sl d= 29.92
Stack Variabies

Cp = 0.84 pitot tube coeffcient (dimenslonless) Pbar = 28.90 in. Hg barometric pressure Ecox = 20 ft elevation difference between ground level and meter box E,am = 28 ft elevation difference between ground level and sampiing ports y= 0.9988 gamma, dry gas meter calibration factor (dimensioniess) 0= 90.0 min net run time (minutes) V ie = 118.7 g total mass of liquid collected in impingers (g) %COz = 1.00 % percent CO z by volume (dry basis) (dimensioniess) %O z = 17.00 % percent O z by volume (dry basis) (dimensioniess) %CO = 0.00 % percent CO by volume (dry basis) (dimensionless) %N z = 82.00 % percent N z by volume (dry basis) (dimensionless) A= 9.5069 fte stack cross-sectionalarea P B = -0.11 in. H 2 0 flue gas static pressure T:.s = 833.75 R average absolute flue gas temperature (460R+tsavg °F) SQOP a , = 0.74 in. wg average square root oP AH = 1,47 in. wg average pressure differential of orifice meter T m = 554.50 R dry gas meter temperature (460R+tsavg °F) V a , = 60.44 ft' volume of inetered gas sample (dry actual cubic feet) D„ = 0.253 in. sampling nozzie diameter 

### Calculated Stack Variables Barometric pressure at sampling location NOTE: Baromotric pressure recorded et Broond level

Paem = Pcar - [( E sam / 100 ft)' 0.1 in. Hg J
P sa , n = 28.90 - ( ( 28.0 / 100 ) * 0.1 )
Psem = 28.87 in. Hg Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions (dscf)

Vmrd=y`Vm*[Pnar

- ([(Eoo,/ 100 ft) *0

. 1 in.Hg]+( 4 H/ 13

. 6 ))/Pdd] * (Trid/Tm) Vmsla = 0.9988 * 60.435 * ( ( 28.90 - ( ( 20.0 / 100 ) * 0.1 ) + ( 1.4733 / 13.6) ) 129.92 ) * ( 528.0 / 554.500 )
Vmsta = 55.688 ft 3 Volume of water vapor at standard conditions (68 °F, scf)

Vwsta = ( 0.04715 ft'/g ) * Vlc Vwsta = ( 0.04715 * 118.7 )
Vwsm = 5.6 fta

Test Date: 6/24/2008 - 6/25/2008 Page 5 A(r Compllance Testlrtg, Inc. - 080609