alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 63 (Friday, April 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 18244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7594]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-923-1310-FI; WYW164400]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 
WYW164400, Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as 
amended, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for 
reinstatement from Tyler Rockies Exploration, Ltd. for competitive oil 
and gas lease WYW164400 for land in Natrona County, Wyoming. The 
petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due 
since the date the lease terminated under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, Julie L. 
Weaver, Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessee has agreed to the amended lease 
terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10 per acre or fraction 
thereof, per year and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessee has 
paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the 
Department for the cost of this Federal Register notice. The lessee has 
met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in 
Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 
U.S.C. 188), and the BLM is proposing to reinstate lease WYW164400 
effective October 1, 2010, under the original terms and conditions of 
the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. The 
BLM has not issued a valid lease to any other interest affecting the 
lands.

Julie L. Weaver,
Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 2011-7594 Filed 3-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 82195 / December 1, 2017

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-17673

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

 :

 : ORDER APPOINTING

EZTD, Inc. : TAX ADMINISTRATOR

:

:

Respondent. :

___________________________________ :

By order dated June 30, 2017, the Commission issued the “Omnibus Order Directing the 

Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that Establish Distribution 

Funds” (“Omnibus Order”),1authorizing the Secretary to issue orders beginning June 2017 and for 

calendar year 2018 appointing, upon request by the Commission staff, Miller Kaplan Arase LLP, a 

certified public accounting firm, which acquired Damasco & Associates LLP (“Miller Kaplan”), 

with one of their offices located in San Francisco, California, as tax administrator (“Tax 

Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund may incur tax-related 

obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department of the Treasury 

Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On November 29, 2017, the Commission staff requested the appointment of Miller 

Kaplan as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Miller Kaplan, pursuant to and in accordance with the 

Omnibus Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Brent J. Fields

Secretary

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 81057 (June 30, 2017).
#### John Juliams v. Carey Printing Company.

Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed. Present —Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
        THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATINO  EXTRACTED FROM
        COMBINED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
        REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001102995
<NAME>                        ENTERPRISE PROD. OPERATING LP
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         39952
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  314819
<ALLOWANCES>                                   12053
<INVENTORY>                                    138039
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               530027
<PP&E>                                         1226326
<DEPRECIATION>                                 284490
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1845103
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          511698
<BONDS>                                        404000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     921191
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1845103
<SALES>                                        2056307
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2079597
<CGS>                                          1878233
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1878233
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               20020
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             23330
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                158014
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            167177
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   167177
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.00


</TABLE>
### §177. Injunctions

(a) In General.—The United States may obtain in a civil action an injunction against—

(1) the conduct prohibited under section 175 of this title;

(2) the preparation, solicitation, attempt, threat, or conspiracy to engage in conduct prohibited under section 175 of this title; or

(3) the development, production, stockpiling, transferring, acquisition, retention, or possession, or the attempted development, production, stockpiling, transferring, acquisition, retention, or possession of any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system of a type or in a quantity that under the circumstances has no apparent justification for prophylactic, protective, or other peaceful purposes.

(b) Affirmative Defense.—It is an affirmative defense against an injunction under subsection (a)(3) of this section that—

(1) the conduct sought to be enjoined is for a prophylactic, protective, or other peaceful purpose; and

(2) such biological agent, toxin, or delivery system is of a type and quantity reasonable for that purpose.

(Added Pub. L. 101–298, §3(a), May 22, 1990, 104 Stat. 202; amended Pub. L. 104–132, title V, §511(b)(2), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1284.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 104–132 inserted "threat," after "attempt,".
### §1005. Deposit of royalty payments and deduction of expenses

The Register of Copyrights shall receive all royalty payments deposited under this chapter and, after deducting the reasonable costs incurred by the Copyright Office under this chapter, shall deposit the balance in the Treasury of the United States as offsetting receipts, in such manner as the Secretary of the Treasury directs. All funds held by the Secretary of the Treasury shall be invested in interest-bearing United States securities for later distribution with interest under section 1007. The Register may, in the Register's discretion, 4 years after the close of any calendar year, close out the royalty payments account for that calendar year, and may treat any funds remaining in such account and any subsequent deposits that would otherwise be attributable to that calendar year as attributable to the succeeding calendar year.

(Added Pub. L. 102–563, §2, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4242; amended Pub. L. 103–198, §6(b)(2), Dec. 17, 1993, 107 Stat. 2312.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1993—Pub. L. 103–198 struck out at end "The Register shall submit to the Copyright Royalty Tribunal, on a monthly basis, a financial statement reporting the amount of royalties under this chapter that are available for distribution."
§ 361.100 What are the purposes of the Unified and Combined State Plans? ( a ) The Unified and Combined State Plans provide the framework for States to outline a strategic vision of, and goals for, how their workforce development systems will achieve the purposes of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA).
( b ) The Unified and Combined State Plans serve as 4-year action plans to develop, align, and integrate the State's systems and provide a platform to achieve the State's vision and strategic and operational goals. A Unified or Combined State Plan is intended to: ( 1 ) Align, in strategic coordination, the six core programs required in the Unified State Plan pursuant to § 361.105(b), and additional Combined State Plan partner programs that may be part of the Combined State Plan pursuant to § 361.140;
( 2 ) Direct investments in economic, education, and workforce training programs to focus on providing relevant education and training to ensure that individuals, including youth and individuals with barriers to employment, have the skills to compete in the job market and that employers have a ready supply of skilled workers;
( 3 ) Apply strategies for job-driven training consistently across Federal programs; and
( 4 ) Enable economic, education, and workforce partners to build a skilled workforce through innovation in, and alignment of, employment, training, and education programs.
### §718g. Violations

Any person that violates or fails to comply with any provision of this subchapter (including a regulation promulgated under this subchapter) shall be subject to the penalties described in section 707 of this title.

(Mar. 16, 1934, ch. 71, §7, as added Pub. L. 109–266, §10(h), Aug. 3, 2006, 120 Stat. 678.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 718g, act Mar. 16, 1934, ch. 71, §7, 48 Stat. 452, related to penalties prior to repeal by Pub. L. 109–266, §10(h), Aug. 3, 2006, 120 Stat. 677.
#### People’s Building, Loan & Savings Association of New York v. Israel Pearlman.

Filed December 5, 1900.

No. 10,875.

Printed Abstract. "Where a cause is submitted in this court under section 1 of *rule*3, and the printed abstract contains no specification of the errors relied on for a reversal, no question is presented for decision, and the judgment will be affirmed.

Error from the district court for Cass county. Tried below before Ramsey, J.

*Affirmed.*

*R. B. Windham*and *J. B. Strode,*for plaintiff in error.

*Matthew Goring, contra.*

Per Curiam.

• This was a law action instituted in the county court of Cass county and removed thence by appeal to the dis*2trict court, where the plaintiff, Israel Pearlman, obtained a money judgment against the defendant, the People's Building, Loan & Savings Association of New York. When the cause reached this court it ivas advanced a,nd submitted under the first section of rule 2, upon an agreed abstract of the record. This abstract does not contain a specification of any of the errors upon which defendant relies for a reversal of the judgment, and hence there is no question properly before us for decision. The case is ruled by *O’Neill v. Flood,*58 Nebr., 218, and *Manning v. Freeman,*58 Nebr., 485. The judgment is

Affirmed.
§ 463.410 What other entities may serve as one-stop partners? ( a ) Other entities that carry out a workforce development program, including Federal, State, or local programs and programs in the private sector, may serve as additional partners in the one-stop delivery system if the Local WDB and chief elected official(s) approve the entity's participation.
( b ) Additional partners may include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Employment and training programs administered by the Social Security Administration, including the Ticket to Work and Self-Sufficiency Program established under sec. 1148 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b-19);
( 2 ) Employment and training programs carried out by the Small Business Administration;
( 3 ) Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) employment and training programs, authorized under secs. 6(d)(4) and 6(o) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2015(d)(4));
( 4 ) Client Assistance Program authorized under sec. 112 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 732);
( 5 ) Programs authorized under the National and Community Service Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12501 *et seq.*); and
( 6 ) Other appropriate Federal, State or local programs, including, but not limited to, employment, education, and training programs provided by public libraries or in the private sector.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

          HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                     DEBT SECURITIES RATINGS

                                      Standard    Moody's
                                      & Poor's  Investors   Fitch
                                   Corporation    Service    Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------
At December 31, 2000
------------------------------------------------------------------

Household Finance Corporation
  Senior debt                                A         A2      A+
  Senior                                    A-         A3       A
  subordinated debt
  Commercial paper                         A-1        P-1     F-1


Household Bank (Nevada) N.A.
  Senior debt                                A         A2      A+
------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATIONEXTRACTED FROM THE RELATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH ON THE JOINT ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000316206
<NAME> STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      13,644,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               73,085,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           153,597,000
<PP&E>                                     318,325,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             558,651,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      508,483,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       513,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  49,655,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               558,651,000
<SALES>                                    909,824,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           913,688,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              630,653,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           274,861,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          16,499,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,223,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,223,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,223,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20


</TABLE>
- Newsroom        - Press Releases
      - Public Statements
      - Speeches
      - Testimony
      - Spotlight Topics
      - Media Gallery
      - Upcoming Events
      - Webcasts
      - What's New
      - SEC Videos
      - Reports and Publications
      - RSS Feeds
      - Social Media 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting; Cancellation

**FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:** 85 FR 60845, September 28, 2020

**PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:** Wednesday, September 30, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.

**CHANGES IN THE MEETING:** The Open Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, September 30, 2020 at 10:00 a.m., has been cancelled.

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:** For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: September 28, 2020

Vanessa A. CountrymanSecretary
#### § 395.5 Approval of application for designation as State licensing agency.

When the Secretary determines that an application submitted by a State vocational rehabilitation agency under § 395.2, and the accompanying rules and regulations indicate a plan of program operations which will stimulate and enlarge the economic opportunities for the blind, and which will meet all other requirements of this part, he shall approve the application and shall designate the applying State vocational rehabilitation agency as the State licensing agency.
Summary: BIE Employees Misused Government Charge Cards 

Report Date: August 3, 2020 Report Number: 17-0209 

The OIG investigated allegations that Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) Facilities employees 

Simon Nunez, David Parrish, and Leland Martinez and San Felipe School employees Ruby 

Montoya and Nancy Nunez made personal purchases on their assigned Government charge 

cards. 

Parrish and Martinez admitted to purchasing personal items, including sheds, tankless water 

heaters, computers, and tools, with their Government purchase charge cards between August 

2013 and December 2016. Simon Nunez, a BIE Facilities Manager, directed the purchases 

and kept some of the stolen property. Nunez purchased three computers, two of which she 

converted for personal use and one of which she gave to Montoya to be converted to personal 

use. Montoya authorized Nunez to purchase one computer, which Montoya converted to 

personal use. 

Simon Nunez pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico to nine counts 

of theft, conspiracy, and false statements. He was sentenced to 6 months in prison followed by 

24 months of supervised release and was ordered to pay $6,664.52 in restitution, a $900 special 

assessment, and a $5,000 fine. Simon Nunez left Federal service on December 23, 2016. 

Parrish pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico to four counts of 

conspiracy and theft. He was sentenced to 18 months of probation and was ordered to pay 

$2,035.51 in restitution, a $400 special assessment, and a $2,500 fine. Parrish left Federal service 

on December 23, 2016. 

Martinez pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico to five counts of 

conspiracy and theft. He was sentenced to 24 months of probation and was ordered to pay $2,895 

in restitution, a $500 special assessment, and a $500 fine. Martinez left Federal service on 

November 6, 2019. 

Montoya pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico to unlawful 

conversion of government property and was sentenced to 12 months of probation and was 

ordered to pay a $2,000 fine. Montoya left Federal service on February 10, 2017. 

Nancy Nunez pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico to three 

counts of unlawful conversion of government property and was sentenced to 24 months of 

probation and was ordered to pay a fine of $8,879 and a special assessment of $300. Nancy 

Nunez left Federal service on April 14, 2017. 

This is a summary of an investigative report we issued to the BIE Director. 

Office of Investigations | Office of Inspector General | U.S. Department of the Interior | Washington, DC
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0803 Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-214-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection retained 

from AD 2007-26-

05

10.0 $ 850.00 $ 850.00 139 $118,150.00

Inspection (new

proposed action) 14.0 $1,190.00

$1,190.00 139 $165,410.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $283,560

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

Fitting

Replacement 132.0 $11,220.00 $21,643 $32,863.00

Bolt Replacement 105.0 $8,925.00 $65 $8,990.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: