alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit (32.2)**
**Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**
For the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the *Sarbanes-Oxley Act*of 2002, the undersigned, Paul A. Smith, the chieffinancial officer of Imperial Oil Limited (the Company”), hereby certifies thatto his knowledge:
(i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the*Securities Exchange Act*of 1934; and
(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: March 11, 2004 /s/ Paul A. Smith Paul A. SmithController and Senior Vice-President,Finance and Administration(Chief Financial Officer)
#### UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Buford E. TRAMMEL Defendant—Appellant.

No. 01-5249.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 6, 2002.

Before NELSON, SILER, and CLAY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

It is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is, affirmed for reasons stated on the record.
Jennifer T. Langley, Esq. (VSB# 81454)

INMAN & STRICKLER, P.L.C.

575 Lynnhaven Parkway, Suite 200

Virginia Beach, Virginia 23452

Tel: 757-486-7055

Fax: 757-431-0410

jlangley@inmanstrickler.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Norfolk Division

In re: Dontriniece L. Knox Case No. 17-73553-FJS

Debtor. Chapter 7

CONSENT ORDER MODIFYING AUTOMATIC STAY

Upon the Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay by Jessica Lynch (“Plaintiff”), 

having been properly served and upon agreement by Counsel, and it appearing that the relief 

requested is in the best interest of the parties; and after due deliberation and sufficient cause 

appearing therefore, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. The Motion is GRANTED; and

2. That relief be granted as to the Debtor pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §362(d);

3. the Movant may proceed in the prosecution of their state court actions against the 

Debtor Defendant to engage in pre-trial discovery and other trial, preparation proceedings, 

settlement negotiations, and with the trial of the case and appeal, if any, of the verdict;

4. the Movant may enforce any judgment obtained only to the extent of applicable 

insurance coverage of the Debtor Defendant; 

5. That the 14-day stay described in Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 

4001(a)(3) be waived, and such relief from stay shall become effective immediately upon entry 

of this Order; and 

6. For such other relief as the Court deems proper. 

Dated:______________ _

Case 17-73553-FJS Doc 24-1 Filed 05/10/19 Entered 05/10/19 16:23:33 Desc

 Proposed Order Page 1 of 3
Norfolk, Virginia UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

Entered on: ____________________________

I ASK FOR THIS:

/s/Jennifer T. Langley 

Jennifer T. Langley (VSB #81454)

INMAN & STRICKLER, PLC

575 Lynnhaven Pkwy, Ste. 200

Virginia Beach, VA 23452

Counsel for Plaintiff

SEEN AND AGREED:

/s/ Timothy Roy Douglass 

Timothy Roy Douglass (VSB #72901) 

JOHN W. LEE, P.C.

291 Independence Blvd. 

Suite 530, Pembroke 4

Virginia Beach, Virginia 23462

Counsel for the Debtor

CERTIFICATION OF ENDORSEMENT

UNDER LOCAL BANKRUPTCY RULE 9022-1(C)

I hereby certify that the foregoing proposed order has been endorsed by or served upon 

all necessary parties.

/s/ Jennifer T. Langley                       

Case 17-73553-FJS Doc 24-1 Filed 05/10/19 Entered 05/10/19 16:23:33 Desc

 Proposed Order Page 2 of 3
The Clerk shall mail a copy of the entered Order to the following:

Jennifer T. Langley

INMAN & STRICKLER, PLC

575 Lynnhaven Pkwy, Ste. 200

Virginia Beach, VA 23452

Counsel for Movant

Dontriniece L. Knox 

2908 Wingfield Avenue 

Apt. #6 

Chesapeake, VA 23324-4501

Debtor

Timothy Roy Douglass

JOHN W. LEE, P.C.

291 Independence Blvd. 

Suite 530, Pembroke 4

Virginia Beach, Virginia 23462

Counsel for the Debtor

Done at Norfolk, Virginia this ____ day of ________, 201__.

Case 17-73553-FJS Doc 24-1 Filed 05/10/19 Entered 05/10/19 16:23:33 Desc

 Proposed Order Page 3 of 3
§ 462.1 What is the scope of this part? The regulations in this part establish the— ( a ) Procedures the Secretary uses to determine the suitability of standardized tests for use in the National Reporting System for Adult Education (NRS) to measure educational gain of participants in an adult education program required to report under the NRS; and
( b ) Procedures States and local eligible providers must follow when measuring educational gain for use in the NRS.
(Authority: 29 U.S.C. 3292)
[73 FR 2315, Jan. 14, 2008, as amended at 81 FR 55551, Aug. 19, 2016]
#### National Transportation Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Emerald Cab Corporation et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present—Martin P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
#### § 299.17 xxx

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 70344, Aug. 29, 2024.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 79513 / December 8, 2016

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-16846

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

:

UBS Financial Services :

Incorporated of Puerto Rico : THIRD EXTENSION ORDER

 :

:

Respondent. :

____________________________________:

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested an extension of time until 

April 10, 2017 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution under Rule 1101(a) of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(a).

On September 29, 2015, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Administrative 

Proceedings Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making 

Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions (“Order”) against UBS Financial Services 

Incorporated of Puerto Rico (“Respondent”).1 The Order required Respondent to pay a total of 

$15,000,000.00 in disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and a civil money penalty to the 

Commission and created a Fair Fund pursuant to Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 

2002, as amended.

In its request for an extension of time, the Division states that a fund administrator has 

been appointed. The Division requires additional time to finalize the proposed plan of 

distribution. 

 

1 Exchange Act Rel. No. 76013 (Sept. 29, 2015).
2

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s 

request for an extension of time until April 10, 2017 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution 

is granted.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority. 

Brent J. Fields

Secretary
### §1920. False statement or fraud to obtain Federal employees' compensation

Whoever knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up a material fact, or makes a false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation, or makes or uses a false statement or report knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry in connection with the application for or receipt of compensation or other benefit or payment under subchapter I or III of chapter 81 of title 5, shall be guilty of perjury, and on conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine under this title, or by imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both; but if the amount of the benefits falsely obtained does not exceed $1,000, such person shall be punished by a fine under this title, or by imprisonment for not more than 1 year, or both.

(Added Pub. L. 89–554, §3(d), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 610; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(I), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 103–333, title I, §101(b)(1), Sept. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 2547; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §601(a)(10), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3498; Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, §4002(f)(2), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1811.)

| Derivation | U.S. Code | Revised Statutes and Statutes at Large |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 5 U.S.C. 789. | Sept. 7, 1916, ch. 458, §39, 39 Stat. 749. |
| | | Oct. 14, 1949, ch. 691, §103(b), 63 Stat. 855. |

Statutes at Large

The word "That" in the Act of Sept. 7, 1916, is omitted as unnecessary.

The words "under section 8106 of title 5" are substituted for "under section 754 of this title" to reflect the codification of the section in title 5, United States Code. The words "a claim for compensation under subchapter I of chapter 81 of title 5" are substituted for "any claim for compensation" for clarity.

The words "or both" are substituted for "or by both such fine and imprisonment".

Minor changes in phraseology are made to conform to the style of title 18.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–273 substituted "employees' " for "employee's" in section catchline.

1996—Pub. L. 104–294 substituted "fine under this title" the first place it appears for "fine of not more than $250,000" and "fine under this title" the second place it appears for "fine of not more than $100,000".

1994—Pub. L. 103–333 substituted "False statement or fraud to obtain Federal employee's compensation" for "False statement to obtain Federal employees' compensation" as section catchline and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Whoever makes, in an affidavit or report required by section 8106 of title 5 or in a claim for compensation under subchapter I of chapter 81 of title 5, a statement, knowing it to be false, is guilty of perjury and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both."

Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $2,000".
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Ex12e
                               Idaho Power Company
                       Consolidated Financial Information
                 Supplemental Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges



                                            Twelve Months Ended December 31,
                                                 (Thousands of Dollars)
                                          1996         1997         1998       1999         2000
<S>                                  <C>         <C>          <C>           <C>         <C>
Earnings, as defined:
  Income before  income taxes        $ 142,710   $  138,746    $ 140,984   $ 143,078   $ 223,056
  Adjust for distributed income of
  equity investees                      (1,413)      (3,943)      (4,697)       (837)     (3,116)
  Equity in loss of equity method
  investments                                0            0          476           0           0
  Minority interest in losses of
  majority owned subsidiaries                0            0         (125)          0           0
  Supplemental fixed charges, as
  below                                 60,939       64,317       63,967      65,526      61,372

     Total earnings, as defined      $ 202,236   $  199,120    $ 200,605   $ 207,767   $ 281,312

Fixed charges, as defined:
  Interest charges                   $  57,348   $   60,761    $  60,593   $  62,014   $  57,797
  Rental interest factor                   991          982          801         955       1,036

     Total fixed charges                58,339       61,743       61,394      62,969      58,833

  Supplemental increment to fixed
   charges*                              2,600        2,574        2,573       2,557       2,539


     Total supplemental fixed
       charges                       $  60,939   $   64,317    $  63,967   $  65,526   $  61,372

Supplemental ratio of earnings to
   fixed charges                         3.32x        3.10x        3.14x       3.17x       4.58x


*Explanation of increment - Interest on the guaranty of American Falls
      Reservoir District bonds and Milner Dam, Inc. notes which are
      already included in operation expenses.


</TABLE>
(No. 76-CC-1070

#### St. John’s Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St. Francis, an Illinois not-for-profit Corporation, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 25, 1978.*

Graham & Graham, Attorneys for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber and Lawrence W. Reisch, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for Respondent.

Holderman, J.

This matter comes before the Court on a claim filed by Claimant for services rendered to one David W. Landers.

*161David W. Landers was a resident of Springfield Township, Sangamon County, Illinois, and at the time of his hospitalization was in the legal custody of the Juvenile Division, Department of Corrections of the State of Illinois.

David W. Landers was injured in an automobile accident and was taken by emergency vehicle to a hospital where the emergency treatment was rendered for which Claimant now seeks to recover.

This claim was previously presented to the Circuit Court of the Seventh Judicial Circuit, Sangamon County, Illinois, Cause No. 75-LM-808. In that cause, Claimant sought relief against two townships, they being the area in which the parents of the injured party lived at the time of the accident.

At the time of the accident, David W. Landers was on parole to his parents’ home.

The Circuit Court of Sangamon County entered an order, filed December 18,1975, in which the plaintiff s cause of action was dismissed without prejudice. The order stated that the Director of Juvenile Division, Department of Corrections, was legally liable to pay for such hospital services and that since Landers was not indigent, the two townships could not be held liable. The Court further held that the claim must be pursued in the Court of Claims.

Respondent denies liability on the theory that the injured party was not in the actual physical custody and control of the State at the time of the accident in question.

The hospital finds itself in the unenviable position of being compelled by law to furnish services to each and every individual who is brought to its doors and *162then finds that no one cares to assume the responsibility of paying for treatment rendered.

It is not denied by any party herein that the treatment was necessary, that it was furnished, and that the amount claimed is fair and reasonable.

Claimant contends that Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 38, paras. 1003-14-3 provides that the Department can purchase “necessary services” for a parolee and Claimant further contends that medical treatment was a necessary service.

Respondent’s theory is that the statute merely authorizes the department to purchase the services and does not require it to.

There was also some question raised as to whether the Department of Public Aid or the Department of Corrections was the proper department. This seems rather immaterial because in either instance, the State is held liable.

It is the opinion of this Court that Claimant was in the legal custody of the Department of Corrections at the time the services were rendered and that said services should be paid for by the State.

An award is hereby made to Claimant in the amount of $1,952.62.
§ 363.4 What are the authorized activities under the State Supported Employment Services program? ( a ) The State may use funds allotted under this part to— ( 1 ) Provide supported employment services, as defined in 34 CFR 361.5(c)(54);
( 2 ) Provide extended services, as defined in 34 CFR 361.5(c)(19), to youth with the most significant disabilities, in accordance with § 363.11(f), for a period of time not to exceed four years, or until such time that a youth reaches the age of 25 and no longer meets the definition of a youth with a disability under 34 CFR 361.5(c)(58), whichever occurs first; and
( 3 ) With funds reserved, in accordance with § 363.22 for the provision of supported employment services to youth with the most significant disabilities, leverage other public and private funds to increase resources for extended services and expand supported employment opportunities.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, a State may not use funds under this part to provide extended services to individuals with the most significant disabilities.
( c ) Nothing in this part will be construed to prohibit a State from providing— ( 1 ) Supported employment services in accordance with the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan submitted under 34 CFR part 361 by using funds made available through a State allotment under that part.
( 2 ) Discrete postemployment services in accordance with 34 CFR 361.48(b) by using funds made available under 34 CFR part 361 to an individual who is eligible under this part.
( d ) A State must coordinate with the entities described in § 363.50(a) regarding the services provided to individuals with the most significant disabilities, including youth with the most significant disabilities, under this part and under 34 CFR part 361 to ensure that the services are complementary and not duplicative.
(Authority: Sections 7(39), 12(c), 604, 606(b)(6), and 608 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(39), 709(c), 795i, 795k(b)(6), and 795m)
### §1303. Revisions, adaptations, and rearrangements

Protection for a design under this chapter shall be available notwithstanding the employment in the design of subject matter excluded from protection under section 1302 if the design is a substantial revision, adaptation, or rearrangement of such subject matter. Such protection shall be independent of any subsisting protection in subject matter employed in the design, and shall not be construed as securing any right to subject matter excluded from protection under this chapter or as extending any subsisting protection under this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 105–304, title V, §502, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2906.)
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I, Steven M. Healy, CPA the Chief Financial Officer/Principal Accounting Officer of Imperial Industries, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,

(i)

the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 19, 2008

| |  |                                                      
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------
| | 
| |  |                                                      
| |  | /s/ STEVEN M. HEALY, CPA                             
| |  | Steven M. Healy, CPA                                 
| |  | Chief Financial Officer/
Principal Accounting Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID** 

### 07545 **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### x 07545\07545_Checklist_Template.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 07545\07545_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 07545\07545_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted 

### x 07545\07545_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07545\07545_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07545\07545_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 07545\Certification Statement Plant ID 07545.PDF Plant certification statement 

### 07545\Supplemental Documents\07545_Site Drawing - Part A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07545\Supplemental Documents\07545_Wastewater Flow Diagram Part A5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 19-0317

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

KRISTOFER BUTLER,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Peter B. Ohman, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 31 2021

03/31/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0317
### §460t–1. Acquisition of land

#### (a) Authority of Secretary; manner and place; visitor contact station and administrative site; exchange of property; cash equalization payments; State property

The Secretary is authorized to acquire by donation, purchase with donated or appropriated funds, exchange, or otherwise, lands and interests in lands within the boundaries of the area. The Secretary is further authorized to acquire, by any of the above methods, not to exceed ten acres of land or interests therein outside of the boundaries of the area in the vicinity of Lovell, Wyoming, for development and use, pursuant to such special regulations as he may promulgate, as a visitor contact station and administrative site. In the exercise of his exchange authority the Secretary may accept title to any non-Federal property within the area and convey in exchange therefor any federally owned property under his jurisdiction in the States of Montana and Wyoming which he classifies as suitable for exchange or other disposal, notwithstanding any other provision of law. Property so exchanged shall be approximately equal in fair market value: Provided, That the Secretary may accept cash from, or pay cash to, the grantor in such an exchange in order to equalize the values of the properties exchanged. Any property or interest therein owned by the State of Montana or the State of Wyoming or any political subdivision thereof within the recreation area may be acquired only by donation or exchange.

#### (b) Crow Indian tribal lands

No part of the tribal mountain lands or any other lands of the Crow Indian Tribe of Montana shall be included within the recreation area unless requested by the council of the tribe. The Indian lands so included may be developed and administered in accordance with the laws and rules applicable to the recreation area, subject to any limitation specified by the tribal council and approved by the Secretary.

#### (c) Crow Indian recreational facilities; "shoreline" defined

(1) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this subchapter or of any other law, the Crow Indian Tribe shall be permitted to develop and operate water-based recreational facilities, including landing ramps, boathouses, and fishing facilities, along that part of the shoreline of Yellowtail Reservoir which is adjacent to lands comprising the Crow Indian Reservation. Any such part so developed shall be administered in accordance with the laws and rules applicable to the recreation area, subject to any limitations specified by the tribal council and approved by the Secretary. Any revenues resulting from the operation of such facilities may be retained by the Crow Indian Tribe.

(2) As used in this subsection, the term "shoreline" means that land which borders both Yellowtail Reservoir and the exterior boundary of the Crow Indian Reservation, together with that part of the reservoir necessary to the development of the facilities referred to in this subsection.

(Pub. L. 89–664, §2, Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 913.)