alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 31.1 Scope. ( a ) *General.* The Secretary establishes the standards and procedures in this part that apply to the offset from disposable pay of a current or former Federal employee or from amounts payable from the Federal retirement account of a former Federal employee to recover a debt owed the United States under a program adminstered by the Secretary of Education.
( b ) *Exclusions.* This part does not apply to— ( 1 ) Offsets under 34 CFR part 32 to recover for overpayments of pay or allowances to an employee of the Department;
( 2 ) Offsets under 34 CFR part 30; or
( 3 ) Offsets under section 124 of Pub. L. 97-276 to collect debts owed to the United States on judgments.
( c ) *Reports to consumer reporting agency.* The Secretary may report a debt to a consumer reporting agency after notifying the employee, in accordance with 34 CFR 30.35, of the intention to report the debt, and after providing the employee an opportunity to inspect documents, receive a hearing, and enter into a repayment agreement under this part.
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5514; 31 U.S.C. 3711; 31 U.S.C. 3716)
§ 1200.170 Compliance procedures. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this section applies to all allegations of discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs and activities conducted by the agency.
( b ) The agency shall process complaints alleging violations of section 504 with respect to employment according to the procedures established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1614 pursuant to section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791).
( c ) The Executive Director shall be responsible for coordinating implementation of this section. Complaints may be sent to the National Council on Disability, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., suite 814, Washington, DC 20591.
( d ) The agency shall accept and investigate all complete complaints for which it has jurisdiction. All complete complaints must be filed within 180 days of the alleged act of discrimination. The agency may extend this time period for good cause.
( e ) If the agency receives a complaint over which it does not have jurisdiction, it shall promptly notify the complainant and shall make reasonable efforts to refer the complaint to the appropriate Government entity.
( f ) The agency shall notify the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board upon receipt of any complaint alleging that a building or facility that is subject to the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), is not readily accessible to and usable by individuals with handicaps.
( g ) Within 180 days of the receipt of a complete complaint for which it has jurisdiction, the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the investigation in a letter containing— ( 1 ) Findings of fact and conclusions of law;
( 2 ) A description of a remedy for each violation found; and
( 3 ) A notice of the right to appeal.
( h ) Appeals of the findings of fact and conclusions of law or remedies must be filed by the complainant within 90 days of receipt from the agency of the letter required by § 1200.170(g). The agency may extend this time for good cause.
( i ) Timely appeals shall be accepted and processed by the head of the agency.
( j ) The head of the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the appeal within 60 days of the receipt of the request. If the head of the agency determines that additional information is needed from the complainant, he or she shall have 60 days from the date of receipt of the additional information to make his or her determination on the appeal.
( k ) The time limits cited in paragraphs (g) and (j) of this section may be extended with the permission of the Assistant Attorney General.
( l ) The agency may delegate its authority for conducting complaint investigations to other Federal agencies, except that the authority for making the final determination may not be delegated to another agency.
### §487. Cutting timber on land added to Siskiyou National Forest

The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized, in his discretion, to sell the merchantable timber on the land added to the Siskiyou National Forest by section 1 hereof, in accordance with the regulations governing the sale of public timber in the national forests, and the entire proceeds of any sale of the timber on such land shall be deposited in the Treasury of the United States in a special fund designated as "The Oregon and California land-grant fund", referred to in the Act of Congress approved June 9, 1916, chapter 137, section 10, Thirty-ninth Statutes, page 222, and be disposed of in the manner therein designated, the land added forming part of the area which revested in the United States under the provisions of the said Act.

(Sept. 22, 1922, ch. 407, §2, 42 Stat. 1019.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1 hereof, referred to in text, means section 1 of act Sept. 22, 1922, ch. 407, 42 Stat. 1019, which related to exchanges of lands in or adjacent to Siskiyou National Forest and was not classified to the Code. See Codification note set out under sections 486a to 486w of this title.

Act of Congress approved June 9, 1916, referred to in text, was not classified to the Code.
#### Hermann H. Cammann and Others v. Theodorus Bailey and Others.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss,- JJ.
#### Joseph F. Ryan, Appellee, v. Chicago City Railway Company, Appellant.

Gen. No. 15,437.

*Verdicts—when not disturbed as against the evidence.*A verdict will not be set aside on review as against the evidence unless clearly and manifestly against its weight.

Action in case for personal injuries. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Charles M. Walker, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1909.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 3, 1911.

John E. Kehoe and C. Le Roy Brown, for appellant.

James C. McShane, for appellee.

*357Mr. Justice Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.

The appellee, plaintiff, obtained judgment against appellant, defendant, in the Circuit Court for personal injuries.

The appellee was injured in attempting to board the front platform of appellant’s car at or near Archer avenue and Canal street. Questions of fact, such as the sobriety of the appellee, giving a signal to stop, the place the car stopped, the usual place of stopping, whether the car was moving or not at the time appellee attempted to board same, and most, if not all, of the circumstances thereof were controverted. The testimony on these points was often in very sharp conflict.

Appellant complains that the verdict is clearly and manifestly against the preponderance of the evidence. After a careful consideration of all the evidence, refraining here from going into an analysis of the same, which could be of no particular benefit, we do not agree with this contention. Neither do we believe that the damages are excessive.

Appellant also complains of three instructions given in behalf of appellee. We do not think the objections urged to these instructions, or any of them, are tenable.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
- Newsroom        - Press Releases
      - Public Statements
      - Speeches
      - Testimony
      - Spotlight Topics
      - Media Gallery
      - Upcoming Events
      - Webcasts
      - What's New
      - SEC Videos
      - Reports and Publications
      - RSS Feeds
      - Social Media 

# Open Meeting Agenda

## Wednesday, September 18, 2019

| **Item:** | **Oral Argument in the Matter of Alexandre S. Clug, et al.** |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------|

The Commission will hear an oral argument in an appeal from an initial decision of an administrative law judge by Alexandre S. Clug and the Division of Enforcement.

On February 8, 2016, the law judge found that (i) Clug and Aurum Mining, LLC violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder by making material misrepresentations and omissions to investors; (ii) PanAm Terra, Inc. violated Securities Act Section 17(a)(2) by making material misrepresentations and omissions to investors; (iii) Clug and The Corsair Group violated Exchange Act Section 15(a)(1) by acting as unregistered brokers; and (iv) Clug aided, abetted, and caused a violation by Michael W. Crow of Exchange Act Section 15(b)(6)(B).  The law judge also found that Crow was not a de facto executive officer of PanAm, and therefore that PanAm was not primarily liable or Clug secondarily liable for violating Securities Act Section 17(a), Exchange Act Sections 10(b) and 13(a), and Exchange Act Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13, and that Clug did not violate Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) by failing to disclose Crow’s role at PanAm in its periodic reports.

The law judge ordered that Clug cease-and-desist from further violations, pay disgorgement plus prejudgment interest, and be barred from the securities industry and from participating in penny stock offerings. The law judge did not sanction Aurum, PanAm, or Corsair.

Clug appealed the law judge’s findings of fact and conclusions of law as to his violations and sanctions. The Division cross-appealed the findings related to Crow’s role at PanAm and the sanctions for Clug, Aurum, PanAm, and Corsair. The issues likely to be considered at oral argument include whether Clug, Aurum, PanAm, and Corsair committed the above violations and what, if any, sanctions are appropriate.

For further information, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.
§ 300.230 SEA flexibility. ( a ) *Adjustment to State fiscal effort in certain fiscal years.* For any fiscal year for which the allotment received by a State under § 300.703 exceeds the amount the State received for the previous fiscal year and if the State in school year 2003-2004 or any subsequent school year pays or reimburses all LEAs within the State from State revenue 100 percent of the non-Federal share of the costs of special education and related services, the SEA, notwithstanding §§ 300.162 through 300.163 (related to State-level nonsupplanting and maintenance of effort), and § 300.175 (related to direct services by the SEA) may reduce the level of expenditures from State sources for the education of children with disabilities by not more than 50 percent of the amount of such excess.
( b ) *Prohibition.* Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, if the Secretary determines that an SEA is unable to establish, maintain, or oversee programs of FAPE that meet the requirements of this part, or that the State needs assistance, intervention, or substantial intervention under § 300.603, the Secretary prohibits the SEA from exercising the authority in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Education activities.* If an SEA exercises the authority under paragraph (a) of this section, the agency must use funds from State sources, in an amount equal to the amount of the reduction under paragraph (a) of this section, to support activities authorized under the ESEA, or to support need-based student or teacher higher education programs.
( d ) *Report.* For each fiscal year for which an SEA exercises the authority under paragraph (a) of this section, the SEA must report to the Secretary— ( 1 ) The amount of expenditures reduced pursuant to that paragraph; and
( 2 ) The activities that were funded pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section.
( e ) *Limitation.* ( 1 ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, an SEA may not reduce the level of expenditures described in paragraph (a) of this section if any LEA in the State would, as a result of such reduction, receive less than 100 percent of the amount necessary to ensure that all children with disabilities served by the LEA receive FAPE from the combination of Federal funds received under Part B of the Act and State funds received from the SEA.
( 2 ) If an SEA exercises the authority under paragraph (a) of this section, LEAs in the State may not reduce local effort under § 300.205 by more than the reduction in the State funds they receive.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1413(j))
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Alexandria Division 

In the Matter of: 

 Chapter 13

RENE GUILLERMO LOPEZ 18-14082-BFK

 AND 

SANDRA MACIOROSKI LOPEZ

 Debtors

TRUSTEE’S SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO APPROVE 

LOAN MODIFICATION AGREEMENT 

 Thomas P. Gorman, Trustee supplements his previously filed Opposition to 

Debtors’ Motion to Approve Loan Modification Agreement (DKT. #101) by noting 

that since the filing of Debtors’ Motion the lender whose loan is to be modified filed on 

March 22, 2021 CARES ACT Supplemental Proof of Claim on both the main docket 

and the Claims Register (Claim #2) an affirmative statement at Part 2 that of that form 

no loan modification had been entered into as of that March 22, 2021 date. 

_March 30, 2021______ _/s/ Thomas P. Gorman ________ 

Dated Thomas P. Gorman 

Chapter 13 Trustee 

300 N. Washington Street, #400 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

(703) 836-2226 

VSB #26421 

Case 18-14082-BFK Doc 104 Filed 03/30/21 Entered 03/30/21 13:32:35 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this 30th day of March, 2021 mailed a true copy of the 

foregoing Opposition to Motion for Approval of Loan Modification to the following 

parties. 

Rene Guillermo Lopez 

Sandra Macioroski Lopez 

Chapter 13 Debtors 

8717 Bradgate Ct. 

Alexandria, VA 22308 

John C. Morgan, Jr., Esq. 

Counsel for Debtor 

New Day Legal, PLLC 

98 Alexandria Pike, Ste. 10 

Warrenton, VA 20186

 ___/s/ Thomas P. Gorman ______ 

 Thomas P. Gorman 

Case 18-14082-BFK Doc 104 Filed 03/30/21 Entered 03/30/21 13:32:35 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 7.1**

 

----

**Ratio of earnings to fixed charges – Continuing operations**

For the purpose of computing this ratio, earnings consist of Group income from Continuing operations before taxation of Group and income received from companies owned 50% or less, plus fixed charges excluding capitalised interest. Fixed charges consist of interest (including capitalised interest) on all indebtedness, amortisation of debt discount and expense and that portion of rental expense representative of the interest factor.

 

 

| **Ratio    of earnings to    fixed charges**             |   |   | **2004** |   |   | **2003** |   |   | **2002** |   |   | **2001** |   |   | **2000** |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|----------|--------|--------|----------|--------|--------|----------|--------|--------|----------|--------|--------|----------|--------|
| For the Group (UK GAAP)                                  |   |   | 3.3      |   |   | 1.5      |   |   | 2.3      |   |   | 1.7      |   |   | 2.4      |   |
|                                                          |   |
| For the Group with adjustments    to accord with US GAAP |   |   | 2.4      |   |   | 0.5      |   |   | 0.9      |   |   | 1.4      |   |   | —   |   |
|                                                          |   |

The deficiency of earnings to fixed charges under US GAAP for the years ended  December 31,  2003, 2002 and 2000 was £73m, £47m and £422m respectively.

 

----
# Official Journal C 83/5 Ap

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 83 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 485 April 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 83

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 485 April 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 083/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 083/2 | Amendment by France of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services within Guyana (1) | 2 |
| 2005/C 083/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3774 — Pirelli/DB Real Estate/Investitori Associati/La Rinascente-Upim) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 6 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 083/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 083/2

Amendment by France of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services within Guyana (1)

2

2005/C 083/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3774 — Pirelli/DB Real Estate/Investitori Associati/La Rinascente-Upim) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
!"#


$%&$'('!)$'(*+',-$.*/,00!

 $$!'!1+'$'$$',$)$,+!%-!"!-$.+

%%.$'$-!"!-$.!2'1+34

1+$56

7)!'8

)8

''!2'$',.

('.$',.

7$- !%481+

"','8





















		

9"' -'$,!$' 3 &$' 3
$%&$'(' !)$'( *+', -$. */ ,00!

 $$!'!1+'$'$$',$)$,+!%-!"!-$.+%%.$'$-!"!-$.!2'1+3

41+$56&,$3. !+&!$-!.:$$

 ! !+&!$-!.$&",.9888-$'#;$&,$3$,

"&$ &)!''3- %$'3$,,3+!$"!$' !%"".%-!,

!/''	)'+4&+ <	#5!',$&"!$-+%!%.,-$,!3%%2

	





 !"#$5*!'=%$'>+!$)+$55/!%$&7#;

1%5;#66&!$%
%"&'

*$%8<	555555#

4!(

Case 17-74129-SCS Doc 32 Filed 03/21/18 Entered 03/21/18 11:14:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 4
	%% !-!$'%!', 3%%2$'(,-$,"".%-!,$' $.34&+ 

!3<$($'$!

	%% !-!$'%"$-"!-%3%!',2$  +$%,$'(!',$&")&' '

%'($'( %.$'($' $.34&+ 3&%."=7($$!%

$$-3%=+'.<$($'$!='2''+&,!',,$('!,!+&

$'  /%-=  +&    !   2'  '     )$,  4%!  3  +  $( %!',  .',$-!

'-"!,$,+%.-,,$' %=?33$-3 $-+$+3 $.3

 !"!=3&%.3%=+'.<$($'$!$'7!"/=@!4!(2 $- 

4%!3'-$&!,3!3+ ,-$"$'3 !$,2 $- $ $',-$,

!3%%23'$'(3$3.653' ' '%$'3/''	)'+!',A',$'(

' 2!, 2' "!!%%%%$'! ,$!'- 32 +',,!', $.'!', 3$)

' #863&%8

2 $- %$3 !%%A', "+- !! 3-%+!%!%%2 "+- !!=

+- !-$'+',!%!2!&!.'-!.!$'"$'3 "".8

*91 ! 7)!' !%%"&"%.'$3. +!',  !"

#1+$'2$$'(3 +%3!'.3-%+3 +B-,,!',"!.  !"

#1+!'.A-3+',-$),3&+- 3-%+!%,$+,+"'!(&'

2$  +"'3+ ,3 +8

*91 !+"''.3 ,(!'$'(%$33& !+&!$-

!.  3  9888 C#;   1+  2$%% $&&,$!%.  -!  &!=$'(  !'.  "!.&'  ' 

7)!'D-+,-%!$&2 $- 2>+$,. "%!'8	'.!&',,+'-+,-%!$&3!

,3$-$'-.&+3$%,. 7)!'2$ !'!--+'$'( 2$'( 2 ,3$-$'-.2!

-!%-+%!,2$ $'5,!.3& ,!'2 $-  ,%$3$'(!.$',+- -%!$&

!(!$' !'=+"-.! !%%3)!,8

!3%=$)$$'<$($'$! $EEEEE,!.3EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE5@

EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

F+,(9'$,!/!'=+"-.+

	





 !"#$5*!'=%$'>+!$)+$55/!%$&7#;

1%5;#66&!$%
%"&'

*$%8<	555555#

4!(

Mar 21 2018

/s/ Stephen C. St.John

Entered on Docket: Mar 21, 2018

Case 17-74129-SCS Doc 32 Filed 03/21/18 Entered 03/21/18 11:14:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 4
 ((	

  

!'$%G)$'$' !+/	@6

F!'87+" ./	@66

'H$'(7$,	%!'$-4

5*!'=%$'>+!$)+$55

/!%$&7#;

4 5;#66

*!A#@6##

&!$%,$' !+I'$'(8-&

	'.37)!'

		(,

00!.+$ &$%2=$)$!3!A

!.+$ &$%2=$

#G&")$%%!,56

<$($'$!/!- <	#;

-!.I(- &8-&

	'.3



00
!'	89 F8!33	'.)$!&!$%

7$- !%48

@5'$$-%+$5

 !"!=<	##5

 !"#1+

	

1  +',$(', -$3$ "++!'-!%+% 5- ! !%% '-!. "!$ !)

',, 3($'(,!', ! ,$!,.3'.8

((	



	'.37)!'

	





 !"#$5*!'=%$'>+!$)+$55/!%$&7#;

1%5;#66&!$%
%"&'

*$%8<	555555#

4!(#

Case 17-74129-SCS Doc 32 Filed 03/21/18 Entered 03/21/18 11:14:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 4
	

1 +',$(',-$3$ ! 3($'(,!'$'(%$33&!.$+!'$!%%.$'

-&"%$!'-2$  3&,>+$,.	,&$'$!$),58

((	



	'.37)!'


$%% -%="%!',-"$3 $,$'%-'$-3&!!%%"!$2 !%$,'

 *.&!',

''!2'$',.

; !	&&'

<$($'$!/!- <	#;

('.$',.

; !	&&'

<$($'$!/!- <	#;

	





 !"#$5*!'=%$'>+!$)+$55/!%$&7#;

1%5;#66&!$%
%"&'

*$%8<	555555#

4!(

Case 17-74129-SCS Doc 32 Filed 03/21/18 Entered 03/21/18 11:14:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 4
# C_2008226EN.01S00301.xml

| 3.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
EXHIBIT 31.1  SECTION 302 PRESIDENT CERTIFICATION  FORM OF CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE  I, Jeff Jenson, the President of I/NET, Inc., certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of I/NET, Inc. (the registrant) 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) (omitted in accordance with SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986); c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Dated: 11/30/2006 /s/ Jeff Jenson Jeff Jenson President and Director
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ancona Mining Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
the "report"), I, Hugh Grenfal, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Dated this 13th day of November, 2003.



/s/
________
Hugh Grenfal, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Ancona Mining Corp.