alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### General description of cores of pre-Selma Cretaceous strata in western Alabama

By: Watson Hiner Monroe

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1160A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
-                                 Larger Work: This publication is Chapter                                A of                                                                              Studies of pre-Selma Cretaceous core samples from the outcrop area in western Alabama                                                                    
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# Official Journal C 352A/7 Oc

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 352A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 577 October 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 352A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 577 October 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2014/C 352A/1 | Recruitment Notice PE/180/S | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2014/C 352A/1

Recruitment Notice PE/180/S

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2014/C 352A/2 | Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals | 28 |

2014/C 352A/2

Review of ‘Competition’ C A Official Journals

28

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.04

                  AMENDMENT TO ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC. AND CIT
             AMENDED AND RESTATED ALLOSTERIC MODIFIERS OF HEMOGLOBIN
                                    AGREEMENT

This agreement of Amendment (Amendment) is entered into as of March 12, 1996 by
and between Allos Therapeutics, Inc. (Allos) and the Center for Innovative
Technology (CIT), both corporations organized under the laws of the Commonwealth
of Virginia.

1.       Allos, formerly Hemotech Sciences, Inc., and CIT entered into an
         agreement on or about January 10, 1994, entitled Hemotech and CIT -
         Amended and Restated Allosteric Modifiers of Hemoglobin Agreement
         (hereinafter called the Agreement).

2.       Allos and CIT wish to amend the Agreement as set forth in this
         Amendment in order to (1) modify Paragraph 8, Operations to be in
         Virginia, of the Agreement related to the location of Allos'
         headquarters and (2) the intent to negotiate a lease for space in the
         Virginia Biotechnology Park.

         2.1.     The first sentence in Paragraph 8.0 of the Agreement, which
                  reads "Hemotech shall locate its headquarters in Virginia," is
                  hereby deleted and amended.

         2.2.     Allos (Hemotech) agrees to immediately pursue discussions with
                  the intent to negotiate a lease for space in the Virginia
                  Biotechnology Research Park, subject to reasonable lease terms
                  (eg., per square foot cost, amount of space, term of lease)
                  and the occupancy of laboratory space by Dr. Donald Abraham's
                  research group in the Biotechnology Park by December 31, 1996.

3.       All terms in this Amendment shall be as defined in the Agreement.

4.       The Agreement or this Amendment may be altered only in writing signed
         by both parties.

ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:

CENTER FOR INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY

By: /s/ ROBERT G. TEMPLIN, JR.                            3-12-96
   -------------------------------------          ------------------------------
   Robert G. Templin, Jr.                         Date
   President


ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

By: /s/ STEPHEN J. HOFFMAN                                3/12/96
   ---------------------------------              ------------------------------
   Stephen J. Hoffman, Ph.D., M.D.                Date
   President
### §5158. Protection of striped bass in the exclusive economic zone

#### (a) Regulation of fishing in exclusive economic zone

The Secretary shall promulgate regulations governing fishing for Atlantic striped bass in the exclusive economic zone that the Secretary determines—

(1) are consistent with the national standards set forth in section 301 of the Magnuson Act (16 U.S.C. 1851);

(2) are compatible with the Plan and each Federal moratorium in effect on fishing for Atlantic striped bass within the coastal waters of a coastal State;

(3) ensure the effectiveness of State regulations on fishing for Atlantic striped bass within the coastal waters of a coastal State; and

(4) are sufficient to assure the long-term conservation of Atlantic striped bass populations.

#### (b) Consultation; periodic review of regulations

In preparing regulations under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, the appropriate Regional Fishery Management Councils, and each affected Federal, State, and local government entity. The Secretary shall periodically review regulations promulgated under subsection (a), and if necessary to ensure their continued consistency with the requirements of subsection (a), shall amend those regulations.

#### (c) Applicability of Magnuson Act provisions

The provisions of sections 307, 308, 309, 310, and 311 of the Magnuson Act (16 U.S.C. 1857, 1858, 1859, 1860, and 1861) regarding prohibited acts, civil penalties, criminal offenses, civil forfeitures, and enforcement shall apply with respect to regulations and any plan issued under subsection (a) of this section as if such regulations or plan were issued under the Magnuson Act.

(Pub. L. 98–613, §9, as added Pub. L. 105–146, §2, Dec. 16, 1997, 111 Stat. 2676.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 9 of Pub. L. 98–613, Oct. 31, 1984, 98 Stat. 3190; Pub. L. 99–432, §5, Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 990; Pub. L. 100–589, §2, Nov. 3, 1988, 102 Stat. 2984; Pub. L. 102–130, §2(c), Oct. 17, 1991, 105 Stat. 626, related to the period of effectiveness of sections 1 to 8 of Pub. L. 98–613, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–206, title VIII, §812, formerly §810, Dec. 20, 1993, 107 Stat. 2453, renumbered §812, Pub. L. 104–297, title IV, §404(c), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3619. Section 812 of Pub. L. 103–206 was itself repealed by Pub. L. 106–555, title I, §122(b)(1)(B), (2), Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2766.
United States Bankruptcy Court 

Eastern District of Virginia 

________________ Division 

In re: Case Number ________________ 

Chapter ___ 

 Debtor(s) 

ORDER SETTING HEARING 

TO: Debtor(s) 

Attorney for Debtor(s) 

 Trustee 

 United States Trustee 

The Clerk has determined that the above-captioned debtor(s) has/have failed to cure certain 

deficiency(ies) in this case. Therefore, a hearing will be held: 

Date:

Time: 

Location:

The debtor(s) should appear at the hearing and explain why the bankruptcy case should not be 

dismissed for failure to timely cure the following deficiency(ies): 

If the debtor(s) fails to appear at the hearing, the above-captioned case will be dismissed. 

NOTICE: Even if the debtor(s) files the required document(s) or makes the required payment(s), 

the debtor(s) must still attend the hearing to explain why he/she/they failed to do so timely. 

NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that an outstanding balance of the filing fee in the amount of 

$_________ is due and owing to the Clerk of Court, payable as follows: 

 due and payable immediately. 

 $________ on ___________, $________ on __________, and $________on _________. 

Dated: _______________________ William C. Redden, Clerk 

 United States Bankruptcy Court 

By: _____________________________ 

Deputy Clerk 

NOTICE OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER 

ENTERED ON DOCKET: __________________ 

[osethrgln ver. 07/18] 

Eastern

Anthony F. Ford 18-12013-BFK

Kim A. Kieklak 7

Anthony F. Ford & Kim A. Kieklak

13812 Beaujolais Ct. Chantilly, VA 20151

PRO SE

Kevin R. McCarthy McCarthy & White, 8508 Rehoboth Ct. Vienna,VA 22182

John P. Fitzgerald, III 115 S.Union St, Rm 210 Alexandria, VA 22314

August 28, 2018

9:30am

200 S. Washington Street, Judge Kenney's Courtroom 1, 2nd Floor, Alexandria, VA 22314

Schedules A-I

0.00

July 23, 2018

/s/ Angela R. Jones

July 23, 2018

Case 18-12013-BFK Doc 22 Filed 07/23/18 Entered 07/23/18 10:13:30 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
(No. 76-CV-0997

#### In Re Application of Epifanio Robles, Claimant, Robert C. Robles, Deceased Victim.

*Opinion filed August 31, 1978.*

Roberta Strickler, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Barbara Gilleran-Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

This claim arises out of an incident that occurred on January 8, 1976. Epifanio Robles, father of the deceased victim, Robert C. Robles, seeks compensation pursuant to the provisions of the “Crime Victims Compensation Act,” hereafter referred to as the Act, *(Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 70, §71, et seq.).*

This Court has carefully considered the application for benefits submitted on the form prescribed by the Court, and an investigatory report of the Attorney *1091General of Illinois which substantiates matters set forth in the application. Based upon these documents and other evidence submitted to the Court, the Court finds:

1. The Claimant’s deceased son, Robert C. Robles, age 18, was a victim of a violent crime as defined in *§72(c)*of the Act, to wit: Reckless Conduct *(Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 38, §12-5).*

2. That on January 8, 1976, at 2150 West North Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, the victim was shot and killed with a bullet fired from a gun in the offender’s possession. Prior to the incident, the offender had been showing the gun to the victim. The victim’s body was taken to St. Elizabeth Hospital where he was pronounced dead on arrival.

3. The Claimant seeks compensation under the Act for funeral expenses only. The Claimant was not dependent.

4. Claimant incurred funeral and burial expenses as a result of the victim’s death in the amount of $869.00.

5. That §77(d) of the Act provides for a deduction of . $200.00 plus the amount of benefits, payments or awards payable under the “Workmen’s Compensation Act,” *(Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 48,*§138.1, et seq.), from local governmental, State or Federal funds or from any other source, except annuities, pension plans, Federal Social Security benefits and the net proceeds of the first $25,000.00 of life insurance paid or payable to the Claimant.

6. The Claimant has received $500.00 in reimbursements as a result of the victim’s death that can be counted as applicable deductions:

> *1092Public Aid $300.00

> United Christian Community Service $200.00

7. The Claimant has complied with all pertinent provisions of the Act and qualifies for compensation thereunder.

8. The Claimant is entitled to an award based on the following:

> Funeral Expenses $869.00

> Less Deductible -200.00

> Public Aid $300.00

> United Christian Community Service 200.00

> Total $169.00

It is hereby ordered that the sum of $169.00 be and is hereby awarded to Epifanio Robles, father of Robert C. Robles, an innocent victim of a violent crime.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

September 14, 2021

In the Matter of

Calmare Therapeutics Incorporated,

File No. 500-1

ORDER OF SUSPENSION

OF TRADING

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Calmare Therapeutics 

Incorporated (“CTTC1”) (CIK No. 102198), a void Delaware corporation located in Fairfield, 

Connecticut with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") Section 12(g) because it is delinquent in its periodic 

filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-K for 

the period ended December 31, 2016. On November 29, 2018, the Commission’s Division of 

Corporation Finance (“Corporation Finance”) sent a delinquency letter to CTTC requesting 

compliance with its periodic filing requirements, which was delivered. As of September 9, 2021, 

the common stock of CTTC was quoted on OTC Link operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. 

(formerly “Pink Sheets”) (“OTC Link”), had six market makers, and was eligible for the 

“piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3). 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors 

require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is 

ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the 

 

1 The short form of each issuer’s name is also its stock symbol.
2

securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on 

September 15, 2021, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 28, 2021.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
### §719. Establishment of Program

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of the Interior (in this subchapter referred to as the "Secretary") may carry out in accordance with this subchapter a program to be known as the "Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design Program" (in this subchapter referred to as the "Program") to accomplish the goals of—

(1) providing to school children environmental education opportunities relating to the conservation and management of migratory birds; and

(2) increasing the capacity for schools, States, and other educational programs to conduct conservation and education programs.

#### (b) Program features

The Program shall consist of—

(1) conducting in all interested States the activities which on the day before October 6, 1994, are conducted under the program known as the Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design Program;

(2) other activities authorized under the Program by this subchapter or any other Act; and

(3) any other activity necessary to carry out the conservation and education goals of the Program.

#### (c) Effort to conduct Program in all States

#### (1) In general

The Secretary shall take appropriate steps to seek to conduct the Program in all of the States.

#### (2) Annual report

The Secretary shall annually submit a report to the Congress on the status of the Program in each of the States.

(Pub. L. 103–340, §2, Oct. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 3119; Pub. L. 106–316, §2(1), Oct. 19, 2000, 114 Stat. 1276.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2000—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 106–316 struck out "50" before "States" in pars. (1) and (2).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 2006 Amendment

Pub. L. 109–166, §1, Jan. 10, 2006, 119 Stat. 3576, provided that: "This Act [amending sections 719a and 719c of this title and provisions listed in a table of National Wildlife Refuges set out under section 668dd of this title] may be cited as the 'Junior Duck Stamp Reauthorization Amendments Act of 2005'."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 103–340, §1, Oct. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 3119, provided that: "This Act [enacting this subchapter and provisions listed in a table of National Wildlife Refuges set out under section 668dd of this title] may be cited as the 'Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design Program Act of 1994'."
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                   CONSENTS OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

      WE CONSENT TO THE INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE IN THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT
OF THE HERTZ CORPORATION ON FORM S-3 (FILE NO. 33-54183) OF OUR REPORT DATED
JANUARY 26, 1996, ON OUR AUDITS OF THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE OF THE HERTZ CORPORATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1995,
AND 1994, AND FOR EACH OF THE TWO YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995, WHICH REPORT IS
INCLUDED IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K.

                                                        COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

PARSIPPANY, NEW JERSEY
MARCH 13, 1996

      AS INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS, WE HEREBY CONSENT TO THE INCORPORATION
OF OUR REPORT INCLUDED IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K, INTO THE HERTZ
CORPORATION'S PREVIOUSLY FILED REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-3 (FILE NO.
33-54183).

                                                        ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

NEW YORK, NEW YORK
MARCH 13, 1996
(No. 76-CC-2202

#### Dixie Lynn Nay, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed June 28, 1979.*

Per Curiam.

This matter comes before the Court on motion of Respondent to dismiss said cause.

Respondent’s motion is based upon the case of *Vaughn, et al v. State of Illinois.*

The present case is based upon a snake bite received by a child on her right ankle at Cave-In-Rock State Park in Hardin County, Illinois on July 5,1975.

This park being a nature area, it appears the incident occurred is one of the natural hazards of the park.

It is hereby ordered that Respondent’s motion to dismiss be, and the same is, hereby granted.
**HEI Exhibit 21**

Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

The following is a list of all direct and indirect subsidiaries of the registrant as of February 27, 2009. The state/place of incorporation ororganization is noted in parentheses and subsidiaries of intermediate parent companies are designated by indentations. 

Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc.(Hawaii) 

Maui Electric Company, Limited (Hawaii) 

Hawaii Electric Light Company, Inc. (Hawaii) 

Renewable Hawaii, Inc. (Hawaii) 

Uluwehiokama Biofuels Corp. (Hawaii) 

HECOCapital Trust III (Delaware) 

HEI Diversified, Inc. (Hawaii) 

American Savings Bank, F.S.B. (federally chartered) 

American Savings Investment Services Corp. (Hawaii)

Bishop Insurance Agency of Hawaii, Inc. (Hawaii) 

Pacific Energy Conservation Services, Inc. (Hawaii) 

HEI Investments, Inc. (Hawaii) (in dissolution) 

HEI Properties, Inc. (Hawaii) 

Hawaiian Electric Industries Capital Trust II(a statutory trust) (Delaware) (potential financing entity) 

Hawaiian Electric Industries Capital Trust III (a statutory trust) (Delaware) (potentialfinancing entity) 

The Old Oahu Tug Service, Inc. (Hawaii)
§ 30.25 How may a debtor obtain an oral hearing? ( a ) If a debtor wants the Secretary to conduct the review requested under § 30.24 as an oral hearing, the debtor must file a written request for an oral hearing together with the request for review filed under § 30.24(a).
( b ) A request filed under paragraph (a) of this section must contain the following in addition to the information filed under § 30.24(b): ( 1 ) An explanation of reason(s) why the debtor believes the Secretary cannot resolve the issues identified in the notice under § 30.22(b)(3)(ii) or § 30.33(b)(3)(ii) through a review of the documentary evidence.
( 2 ) An identification of: ( i ) The individuals that the debtor wishes to have testify at the oral hearing;
( ii ) The specific issues identified in the notice regarding which each individual is prepared to testify; and
( iii ) The reasons why each individual's testimony is necessary to resolve the issue.
( c ) The Secretary grants a debtor's request for an oral hearing regarding the issues identified in the notice under § 30.22(b)(3)(ii) or § 30.33(b)(3)(ii) only if: ( 1 ) ( i ) A statute authorizes or requires the Secretary to consider waiver of the indebtedness involved;
( ii ) The debtor files a request for waiver of the indebtedness with the request for review filed under paragraph (a)(1) of this section; and
( iii ) The question of waiver of the indebtedness turns on an issue of credibility or veracity; or
( 2 ) The Secretary determines that the issues identified in the notice under § 30.22(b)(3)(ii) or § 30.33(b)(3)(ii) cannot be resolved by review of only the documentary evidence.
( d ) Notwithstanding paragraph (b) of this section, the Secretary may deny oral hearings for a class of similar debts if: ( 1 ) The issues identified in the notice under § 30.22(b)(3)(ii) or 30.33(b)(3)(ii) for which an oral hearing was requested, or the issue of waiver, rarely involve issues of credibility or veracity; and
( 2 ) The Secretary determines that review of the documentary evidence is ordinarily an adequate means to correct mistakes.
( e ) The Secretary may decline to consider any reasons that the debtor fails to provide in accordance with paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1880-0515) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3(a)(1) and 1226a-1, 31 U.S.C. 3716(b))
[51 FR 24099, July 1, 1986, as amended at 51 FR 35647, Oct. 7, 1986]