alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §460ooo–3. Establishment of the Las Cienegas National Conservation Area

#### (a) In general

In order to conserve, protect, and enhance for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations the unique and nationally important aquatic, wildlife, vegetative, archaeological, paleontological, scientific, cave, cultural, historical, recreational, educational, scenic, rangeland, and riparian resources and values of the public lands described in subsection (b) while allowing livestock grazing and recreation to continue in appropriate areas, there is hereby established the Las Cienegas National Conservation Area in the State of Arizona.

#### (b) Areas included

The Conservation Area shall consist of approximately 42,000 acres of public lands in the Arizona counties of Pima and Santa Cruz, as generally depicted on the map entitled "Sonoita Valley Acquisition Planning District and Las Cienegas National Conservation Area" and dated October 2, 2000.

#### (c) Maps and legal description

As soon as practicable after December 6, 2000, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a map and legal description of the Conservation Area. In case of a conflict between the map referred to in subsection (b) and the map and legal description submitted by the Secretary, the map referred to in subsection (b) shall control. The map and legal description shall have the same force and effect as if included in this subchapter, except that the Secretary may correct clerical and typographical errors in such map and legal description. Copies of the map and legal description shall be on file and available for public inspection in the Office of the Director of the Bureau of Land Management, and in the appropriate office of the Bureau of Land Management in Arizona.

#### (d) Forest lands

Any lands included in the Coronado National Forest that are located within the boundaries of the Conservation Area shall be considered to be a part of the Conservation Area. The Secretary of Agriculture shall revise the boundaries of the Coronado National Forest to reflect the exclusion of such lands from the Coronado National Forest.

(Pub. L. 106–538, §4, Dec. 6, 2000, 114 Stat. 2564.)
§ 204.300 Scope of this subpart. ( a ) *Convention adoptees.* This subpart governs the adjudication of a Form I-800A or Form I-800 for a Convention adoptee under section 101(b)(1)(G) of the Act. The provisions of this subpart enter into force on the Convention effective date, as defined in 8 CFR 204.301.
( b ) *Orphan cases.* On or after the Convention effective date, no Form I-600A or I-600 may be filed under section 101(b)(1)(F) of the Act and 8 CFR 204.3 in relation to the adoption of a child who is habitually resident in a Convention country. If a Form I-600A or Form I-600 was filed before the Convention effective date, the case will continue to be governed by 8 CFR 204.3, as in effect before the Convention effective date.
( c ) *Adopted children.* This subpart does not apply to the immigrant visa classification of adopted children, as defined in section 101(b)(1)(E) of the Act. For the procedures that govern classification of adopted children as defined in section 101(b)(1)(E) of the Act, see 8 CFR 204.2.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Q Comm International,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  ("SEC")  on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I,  Michael K.  Openshaw,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

     A signed  original  of this  written  statement  has been  provided  to the
Company and will be retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its
staff upon request.


/s/ Michael K. Openshaw
-----------------------

Michael K. Openshaw
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)

November 11, 2004


This  certification  accompanies  the  above-described  Report  on  Form  10-QSB
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except
to the extent  required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
### §5703. Panel

#### (a) Representation

The United States shall be represented on the Panel by six individuals, of whom—

(1) one shall be an official of the United States Government with expertise in salmon conservation and management;

(2) one shall be an official of the State of Alaska with expertise in salmon conservation and management; and

(3) four shall be knowledgeable and experienced with regard to the salmon fisheries on the Yukon River.

#### (b) Appointments

Panel members shall be appointed as follows:

(1) The Panel member described in subsection (a)(1) shall be appointed by the Secretary of State.

(2) The Panel member described in subsection (a)(2) shall be appointed by the Governor of Alaska.

(3) The Panel members described in subsection (a)(3) shall be appointed by the Secretary of State from a list of at least 3 individuals nominated for each position by the Governor of Alaska. The Governor of Alaska may consider suggestions for nominations provided by organizations with expertise in Yukon River salmon fisheries. The Governor of Alaska may make appropriate nominations to allow for, and the Secretary of State shall appoint, at least one member under subsection (a)(3) who is qualified to represent the interests of Lower Yukon River fishing districts, and at least one member who is qualified to represent the interests of Upper Yukon River fishing districts. At least one of the Panel members under subsection (a)(3) shall be an Alaska Native.

#### (c) Alternates

The Secretary of State may designate an alternate Panel member for each Panel member the Secretary appoints under subsections 1 (b)(1) and (3), who meets the same qualifications, to serve in the absence of the Panel member. The Governor of the State of Alaska may designate an alternative Panel member for the Panel member appointed under subsection (b)(2), who meets the same qualifications, to serve in the absence of that Panel member.

#### (d) Term length

Panel members and alternate Panel members shall serve four-year terms. Any individual appointed to fill a vacancy occurring before the expiration of any term shall be appointed for the remainder of that term.

#### (e) Reappointment

Panel members and alternate Panel members shall be eligible for reappointment.

#### (f) Decisions

Decisions by the United States section of the Panel shall be made by the consensus of the Panel members appointed under paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (a).

#### (g) Consultation

In carrying out their functions under the Agreement, Panel members may consult with such other interested parties as they consider appropriate.

(Pub. L. 104–43, title VII, §704, Nov. 3, 1995, 109 Stat. 393.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "subsection".
§ 263.8 What are the requirements for a leave of absence? ( a ) A participant must submit a written request for a leave of absence to the project director not less than 30 days prior to withdrawal or completion of a grading period, unless an emergency situation has occurred and the project director chooses to waive the prior notification requirement.
( b ) The project director may approve a leave of absence, for a period not longer than 12 months, provided the participant has completed a minimum of 50 percent of the training in the project and is in good standing at the time of request.
( c ) The project director permits a leave of absence only if the institution of higher education certifies that the training participant is eligible to resume his or her course of study at the end of the leave of absence.
( d ) A participant who is granted a leave of absence and does not return to his or her course of study by the end of the grant project period will be considered not to have completed the course of study for the purpose of project performance reporting.
[80 FR 22412, Apr. 22, 2015. Redesignated and amended at 85 FR 41379, July 10, 2020]
§ 332.1 Designation of USCIS employees to administer oaths and conduct examinations and hearings. ( a ) *Examinations.* All USCIS officers are hereby designated to conduct the examination for naturalization required under section 335 of the Act, provided that each officer so designated has received appropriate training.
( b ) *Hearings.* Section 336 of the Act authorizes USCIS officers who are designated under paragraph (a) of this section to conduct hearings under that section.
( c ) *Depositions.* All USCIS officers who are designated under paragraph (a) of this section are hereby designated to take depositions in matters relating to the administration of naturalization and citizenship laws.
( d ) *Oaths and affirmations.* All USCIS officers who are designated under paragraph (a) of this section are hereby designated to administer oaths or affirmations except for the oath of allegiance as provided in 8 CFR 337.2.
[76 FR 53800, Aug. 29, 2011]
#### Hedwig Brengel, Appellant, v. Edward Hicks and Henry Hicks, Copartners, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Isaac Hicks & *935Sons, Respondents.

The complaint charges that plaintiff was injured in consequence of the horse which she was driving taking fright at a steam apparatus owned and operated by defendants, and running away, “which was solely due to and solely the result of the negligence of the defendants in the manner in which they were operating and managing said steam apparatus at said time and place in question.” It charges negligence of the defendants in that they so operated the steam apparatus as to cause the horse to take fright and run away, and in this respect is distinguishable from *Pagnillo*v. *Mack P. & C. Co.*(142 App. Div. 491), in which case no fact was alleged from which negligence of defendant could even be inferred. While the complaint cannot be commended, it is not so bad as to require judgment against the plaintiff on the pleadings. The order is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied, with ten dollars costs. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**PERIODIC REPORT CERTIFICATIONof the Chief Executive Officer**

 

I, Manouch Moshayedi, ChiefExecutive Officer of SimpleTech, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to my knowledge:

 

(1) the Quarterly Report ofthe Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending  June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ MANOUCH MOSHAYEDI                                       |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                        |
| Manouch Moshayedi  Chief Executive Officer  August 12, 2003 |

 

----
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Honorable Lonnie Cox

A ppellate case number: 01

- 1 5

- 0 0 797

- CV

Trial court case number: 15 CV0583

Trial court: 56th District Court of Galveston County

On September 17 , 201 5 , relator

, the Honorable Lonnie Cox

, filed a petition

for a writ of injunction and emergency request for temporary relief in this C ourt

. The Court requests a response to the petition for a writ of injunction and

emergency request for temporary relief from respondents . The response is due no

later than Wednesday, September 2 3 , 201 5

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings



Date: September 17, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> OPUR1
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Resources'
financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001042773
<NAME> RELIANT ENERGY RESOURCES CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,447,272
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  1,526,610
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,810,126
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     2,428,789
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,212,797
<COMMON>                                             1
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    2,463,831
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            197,674
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               2,661,506
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              967
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,220,631
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             350,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 184,584
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  223,451
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               2,571,658
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                7,212,797
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                   10,543,545
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            88,771
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                           0
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  10,245,862
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        297,683
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              10,781
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 308,464
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       119,492
<NET-INCOME>                                   100,201
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  100,201
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       95,392
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         135,065
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. Section 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Q Comm International, Inc. (the
        "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
        Michael D. Keough, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to
        18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will
        be
        retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
        request.
 
 /s/
        Michael D. Keough
 
 Michael
        D. Keough
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 
 August
        10, 2005
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 93607 / November 18, 2021

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20185

In the Matter of

ShipChain, Inc.,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

EXTENSION ORDER

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested an extension of time until June 

30, 2022 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution under Rule 1101(a) of the Commission’s 

Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(a).

On December 21, 2020, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist 

Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933, Making Findings, and 

Imposing Penalties and a Cease-and-Desist Order (the “Order”)1against ShipChain, Inc. 

(“ShipChain” or the “Respondent”). In the Order, the Commission found that in late-2017 to 

early-2018, ShipChain, a company involved in the shipping and logistics industry, raised 

approximately $27.6 million by selling more than 145 million digital assets (“SHIP tokens”) in 

an initial coin offering (“ICO”). ShipChain told investors that ShipChain would use the funds 

raised in the ICO to develop a blockchain platform and “jumpstart the ShipChain economy and 

supplement funding to help [ShipChain] deliver the best product possible.” ShipChain violated 

 

1

 Securities Act Rel. No. 10909 (Dec. 21, 2020).
2

Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act by offering and selling these securities without 

having a registration statement filed or in effect with the Commission or qualifying for 

exemption from registration with the Commission. The Commission ordered the Respondent to 

pay a $2,050,000.00 civil money penalty to the Commission. The Commission also created a 

Fair Fund, pursuant to Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, so the penalty paid can 

be distributed to harmed investors (the “Fair Fund”).

The Fair Fund consists of the $2,050,000.00 paid by the Respondent. The Fair Fund has 

been deposited in an interest-bearing account at the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Bureau of 

the Fiscal Service, and any accrued interest will be for the benefit of the Fair Fund.

In its request for an extension of time, the Division states that additional time is needed to 

complete the fund administrator solicitation and appointment process, develop the distribution 

methodology, and prepare a proposed plan of distribution.

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s 

request for an extension of time until June 30, 2022 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution is 

granted. 

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.2

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

2

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(i).
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of the court’s General Order filed November 29, 1993. 151

F.R.D. 470.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 12/8/95

TENTH CIRCUIT

CHARLES MICHAEL BYERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant, No. 95-1300

v. D. Colorado

ANTHONY BELASKI, PAUL GIRVAN,

DEANNA AVILA, LOWELL GREEN,

D. J. FITZGERALD, JOE SILVEY,

GWEN TAYLOR, LEON HARRISON,

CLIFF YOUNG, UNITED STATES

BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

(D.C. No. 91-Z-1504)

Defendants - Appellees.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before ANDERSON, BALDOCK, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this
- 2 -

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This cause is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.

Charles Michael Byers filed suit in the district court alleging constitutional claims

arising from his incarceration as a federal prisoner. Specifically, Byers alleges damages

based on 1) transfer to a higher security facility and denial of transfer to a prison camp or

halfway house, 2) denial of meritorious good time credits, 3) denial of necessary medical

and dental care, 4) exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, and 5) denial of $500

release gratuities. We have reviewed the record in this case and, substantially for the

reasons stated in the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation filed November 2,

1993, and the district court’s order of dismissal filed June 28, 1995, we agree with the

district court that Byers’ complaint fails to allege facts sufficient to state any

constitutional claim.

AFFIRMED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Stephen H. Anderson

Circuit Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
NetVoice Technologies and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      3,930,450
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                               2,179,532
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (20,000)
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            6,577,771
<PP&E>                                      8,303,418
<DEPRECIATION>                              (520,748)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             24,655,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       8,933,250
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                     3,578
<COMMON>                                       15,315
<OTHER-SE>                                 11,429,086
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               24,655,213
<SALES>                                     5,706,799
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            5,706,799
<CGS>                                       5,571,932
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               9,704,447
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            527,861
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (4,512,624)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (4,512,624)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                              (4,512,624)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0





</TABLE>