alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Bankruptcy Court

Eastern District of Virginia

In re Tanya Vanessa Maddox Case No. 18-71324

Debtor(s) Chapter 13

TO:

 State of Maryland

Central Collections Unit

Fifth Floor Certifications

300 West Preston Street

Baltimore, MD 21201

 NOTICE TO

CREDITOR(S) (RE AMENDMENT)

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an amendment to the above-captioned debtor's schedules has been filed

 adding you as a creditor,

 deleting you as a creditor,

 correcting your address

A copy of the amendment is forwarded to you together with this notice.

[If amendment is adding creditor(s)] NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that also forwarded to you together with this notice is

a copy of the notice of the meeting of creditors called by the United States Trustee pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure

2003, giving the particulars of the case and stating the last date for the filing of claims (if any was given), for filing complaints

objecting to the discharge and complaints to determine the dischargeability of certain debts; a copy of the discharge of the debtor, if

one has been entered, a subsequent notice to file claims, if one has been issued, and any other filed document affecting the rights of

the added creditor(s).

Date: 4/26/18 By

Tanya Vanessa Maddox

/s/ Kenneth E. Goolsby

Attorney for Debtor [or Pro Se Debtor]

State Bar No.: 86347 VA

Address: The Alliance Legal Group

133 Mt. Pleasant Road

Chesapeake, VA 23322

Telephone No.: (757) 482-5705

CERTIFICATION

I certify that on 4/26/18 , I served a copy of the foregoing notice on the United States Trustee, any appointed trustee,

and any and all entities affected by the amendment pursuant to Local Bankruptcy Rule 1009-1(A).

/s/ Kenneth E. Goolsby

Kenneth E. Goolsby 86347

Attorney for Debtor [or Pro Se Debtor]

[ ntctoaddcreds ver. R. 11/01]

Software Copyright (c) 1996-2018 Best Case, LLC - www.bestcase.com Best Case Bankruptcy

Case 18-71324-FJS Doc 16 Filed 04/26/18 Entered 04/26/18 14:57:36 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K/A FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998-AMENDMENT NO. 2 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K/A FOR
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 (AMENDMENT NO.2).
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          59,985
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,215,812
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  8,576,960
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,449,383
<PP&E>                                       8,593,460
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,539,664
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,423,741
<BONDS>                                      3,887,593
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        5,477,072
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,053
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,647,789
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,539,664
<SALES>                                     67,124,137
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            67,124,137
<CGS>                                       43,218,466
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               65,084,379
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (244,067)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,158,249
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,125,576
<INCOME-TAX>                                   572,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            553,576
<DISCONTINUED>                               1,021,602
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,575,178
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34
        

</TABLE>
<Page>
EXHIBIT 21.   SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<Table>
<Caption>
             SUBSIDIARY                              PLACE ORGANIZED
------------------------------------       ------------------------------------
<S>                                        <C>

    Helix Securities Corporation                      Massachusetts

    CTI-Cryogenics, Inc.                              Barbados

    Helix Technology UK Limited                       England

    Helix Technology SA                               France

    Helix Technology GmbH                             Germany

    Helix Technology K.K.                             Japan

    Granville-Phillips Company                        Delaware

    Helix Vacuum Technology Ltd.                      Taiwan

    Helix Technology Limited                          Hong Kong

    CTI-Nuclear, Inc.                                 Ohio
</Table>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Robert Tarini, Chief Executive Officer of Markland Technologies, Inc.,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
of Markland Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 2004                   /S/ ROBERT TARINI
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           ROBERT TARINI
                                           CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Manouch Moshayedi, Chief Executive Officer of SimpleTech, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ MANOUCH MOSHAYEDI  
|Manouch Moshayedi      
|Chief Executive Officer



August 13, 2004
United States Department of Agriculture USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Dig In! • Grades 5-6 • http://teamnutrition.usda.gov

Name: ____________________________________________ Date: _______________

Use this template to plan your garden and determine what fruits and vegetables you want to grow. Think about what plants 

grow well together (see Garden Companions for information). Use your Garden Journals and extra graph paper to take 

notes, and sketch out your plans first. Don’t forget to measure your garden plot and draw it to scale below. Map out where 

plants should go by writing the number of each plant on your list.

LESSON 5 HANDOUT 1 My Garden Plan 

78

Plant List 

1. _________________________________

2. _________________________________

3. _________________________________

4. _________________________________

5. _________________________________

6. _________________________________

7. _________________________________

8. _________________________________

9. _________________________________

10. ________________________________

11. ________________________________

12. ________________________________

13. ________________________________

14. ________________________________

15. ________________________________

Notes: _____________________________

____________________________________

____________________________________

____________________________________
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
TYCO HEALTHCARE GROU P LP AND UNITED STATES SURGIC AL CORPORATION, Plaintiffs

- Cross Appellants,

v.

APPLIED MEDICAL RESO URCES CORP., Defendant

- Appellant.

______________________

2013

- 1624, 2014

- 1012

______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 09

- CV

- 0176, Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
J. M ICHAEL J AKES , Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs

- cross appellants. With him on the brief were K

ATHLEEN A. D ALEY , of Washington, DC, and J ACOB A. S CHROEDER , of Palo Alto, California.

J OSEPH R. R E , Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, of Irvine, California , argued for defendant

- appellant. With him on the brief were J OSEPH F. J ENNINGS , S EAN M.M URRAY , M ATTHEW S. B ELLINGER , and S TEPHEN W. L ARSON

.

______________________
T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L OURIE , P LAGER , and W ALLACH , Circuit Judges ).
AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

October 16, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Order entered October 1\ , 2012

In The 

## Court of appeat5 jf iftb /113iotritt of TexaEi at IlDatfa5

No. 05-12-00860-CR MICHAEL JAMES TELLO, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12-53795-T



### ORDER The reporter's record is overdue in this appeal. We have received correspondence from court reporter Bridget Barnhill that appellant has not designated the record. Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant has been deprived of the reporter's record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any other reason.

o The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute this appeal, it shall make a finding to that effect. o If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs for the reporter's record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may

### include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. o The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter's explanation for the delay in filing the reporter's record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter's record can be filed.
We ORDER 

### the trial court to transmit a supplemental record, containing the written findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS 

### of the date of this order. The appeal is ABATED 

### to allow the trial court to comply with this order. It shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is received, whichever is earlier.

LANA MYERS 17 r --- JUSTICE
# Official Journal L 324/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 324 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6519 December 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 324

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6519 December 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 of 30 November 2022 amending the implementing technical standards laid down in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/637 as regards the disclosure of environmental, social and governance risks (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2454 of 14 December 2022 laying down implementing technical standards for the application of Directive 2002/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to supervisory reporting of risk concentrations and intra-group transactions (
  1
  ) | 55 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 of 30 November 2022 amending the implementing technical standards laid down in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/637 as regards the disclosure of environmental, social and governance risks (
  1
  )

1

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2454 of 14 December 2022 laying down implementing technical standards for the application of Directive 2002/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to supervisory reporting of risk concentrations and intra-group transactions (
  1
  )

1

55

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
(No. 76-CV-1277

#### In Re Application of Charles Conti

*Order filed October 23, 1978.*

Poch, J.

This claim arises out of a criminal offense that occurred on October 11,1975, in the 2600 block of North Southport Ave., Chicago, Illinois. The Claimant seeks compensation pursuant to the provisions of the “Crime Victims Compensation Act,” hereafter referred to as the Act *(Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 70., Sec. 71, et seq.).*

Based on the investigatory report of the Attorney General the claim was denied on January 31,1978, on the ground that the Claimant did not incur a pecuniary loss of $200.00 or more atributable to a violent crime. *1093The Claimant objected to this order and requested a full hearing on the merits. This claim was assigned to a Commissioner and a hearing was held on August 9, 1978, before Commissioner Leo J. Spivack where the following facts were established by a preponderance of the evidence:

The Claimant, Charles Conti, was the victim of a violent crime as defined in Sec. 2(c) of the Act to wit: Aggravated Battery *(Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 38, Sec. 12-4).*

As the result of being beaten and robbed on October 11, 1975, the Claimant incurred medical and hospital expenses in the treatment of his broken jaw and head injuries. He seeks compensation for only these expenses. He suffered no loss of income because he had been unemployed for over six months prior to the offense.

> On or about December 6,1975, Detective Ley called Claimant to set up an interview date but was told that Claimant, on advice of counsel, was to make no statement or give any information.

> (c) On or about December 6,1975, Sargent James Tellme, in charge of the homocide investigation, detailed officers to interview Claimant. Such interview was never had, due to the officers inability to contact Claimant.

3. Claimant has not cooperated fully with the authorities in and about the investigation of the crime and the apprehension of those responsible, as is required by the letter of the statute.

Based on the foregoing, the Court finds no reason to modify its order of July 10, 1978.
# Official Journal C 404/1 No

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 404 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 591 November 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 404

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 591 November 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 404/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — sixth supplement to the 34th complete edition | 1 |
| 2016/C 404/02 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — seventh supplement to the 34th complete edition | 14 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 404/01

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — sixth supplement to the 34th complete edition

1

2016/C 404/02

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — seventh supplement to the 34th complete edition

14

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 312.1 Literacy requirements. ( a ) *General.* Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no person shall be naturalized as a citizen of the United States upon his or her own application unless that person can demonstrate an understanding of the English language, including an ability to read, write, and speak words in ordinary usage in the English language.
( b ) *Exceptions.* The following persons need not demonstrate an ability to read, write and speak words in ordinary usage in the English language: ( 1 ) A person who, on the date of filing of his or her application for naturalization, is over 50 years of age and has been living in the United States for periods totalling at least 20 years subsequent to a lawful admission for permanent residence;
( 2 ) A person who, on the date of filing his or her application for naturalization, is over 55 years of age and has been living in the United States for periods totalling at least 15 years subsequent to a lawful admission for permanent residence; or
( 3 ) The requirements of paragraph(a) of this section shall not apply to any person who is unable, because of a medically determinable physical or mental impairment or combination of impairments which has lasted or is expected to last at least 12 months, to demonstrate an understanding of the English language as noted in paragraph (a) of this section. The loss of any cognitive abilities based on the direct effects of the illegal use of drugs will not be considered in determining whether a person is unable to demonstrate an understanding of the English language. For purposes of this paragraph, the term *medically determinable* means an impairment that results from anatomical, physiological, or psychological abnormalities which can be shown by medically acceptable clinical or laboratory diagnostic techniques to have resulted in functioning so impaired as to render an individual unable to demonstrate an understanding of the English language as required by this section, or that renders the individual unable to fulfill the requirements for English proficiency, even with reasonable modifications to the methods of determining English proficiency, as outlined in paragraph(c) of this section.
( c ) *Literacy examination* — ( 1 ) *Verbal skills.* The ability of an applicant to speak English will be determined by a designated immigration officer from the applicant's answers to questions normally asked in the course of the examination.
( 2 ) *Reading and writing skills.* Except as noted in 8 CFR 312.3, an applicant's ability to read and write English must be tested in a manner prescribed by USCIS. USCIS will provide a description of test study materials and testing procedures on the USCIS Internet Web site.
[56 FR 50481, Oct. 7, 1991, as amended at 62 FR 12923, Mar. 19, 1997; 62 FR 15751, Apr. 2, 1997; 64 FR 7993, Feb. 18, 1999; 76 FR 53797, Aug. 29, 2011]
#### Warren Ward, Respondent, v Eastchester Health Care Center, LLC, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 398]

*248Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Patricia Anne Williams, J.), entered August 26, 2004, which granted plaintiffs motion to amend the complaint and denied defendant’s cross motion to serve an amended answer interposing a statute of limitations defense and to strike those portions of the amended complaint and supplemental bill of particulars sounding in medical malpractice, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The original complaint alleged conduct which, if proven, would violate Public Health Law § 2803-c. The proposed amended complaint alleged no new conduct which purportedly violated the Public Health Law, differing from the original pleading only by specifying that redress for the previously alleged violations was sought under Public Health Law § 2801-d. That section authorizes a private right of action for the violation of rights enumerated in section 2803-c of the statute *(see Zeides v Hebrew Home for Aged at Riverdale,*300 AD2d 178 [2002]; *see also Doe v Westfall Health Care Ctr.,*303 AD2d 102 [2002]). Consequently, the amendment could have caused neither surprise nor cognizable prejudice to defendant and the court properly permitted it *(see Zaid Theatre Corp. v Sona Realty Co.,*18 AD3d 352, 354-355 [2005]). Because plaintiffs claims, regardless of how characterized, were timely interposed, the proposed statute of limitations defense lacks merit *(see Thomas Crimmins Contr. Co. v City of New York,*74 NY2d 166, 170 [1989]; *Lanoce v Anderson, Banks, Curran & Donoghue,*259 AD2d 965, 966 [1999]). Defendant’s motion to strike portions of the amended complaint and supplemental bill of particulars, on the ground that plaintiff improperly “intermingled” claims for medical malpractice and ordinary negligence, was properly denied. Defendant failed to demonstrate that the disputed claims do in fact sound in malpractice and are not otherwise permissibly brought, either as ordinary negligence or statutory claims *(cf. Zeides, supra).*Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Gonzalez, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
STATE OF LOU111ISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, F'11IRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

GRACE ANN LOUSTALOT

NO. 2023 KW 0064

MARCH 27, 2023

In Re: State of Louisiana, applying for supervisory writs, 

16th Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Mary, No. 

2018-201334. 

BEFORE: GUIDRY, C.J., WOLFE AND MILLE~, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT

JMG

EW

SMM
§ 105.10 Self-evaluation. ( a ) The Department shall, within one year of the effective date of this part, evaluate its current policies and practices, and the effects thereof, that do not or may not meet the requirements of this part, and, to the extent modification of any of those policies and practices is required, the Department shall proceed to make the necessary modifications.
( b ) The Department shall provide an opportunity to interested persons, including individuals with handicaps or organizations representing individuals with handicaps to participate in the self-evaluation process by submitting comments (both oral and written).
( c ) The Department shall, for at least 3 years following completion of the self-evaluation, maintain on file, and make available for public inspection— ( 1 ) A description of areas examined and any problems identified; and
( 2 ) A description of any modifications made.