alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. Section 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Q Comm International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael D. Keough, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.
 
 
 /s/
Michael D. Keough
 
 Michael
D. Keough
 Chief
Executive Officer
 
 June 2,
2005
#### § 212.20 Applicability of public charge inadmissibility.

8 CFR 212.20 through 212.23 address the public charge ground of inadmissibility under section 212(a)(4) of the Act. Unless the alien requesting the immigration benefit or classification has been exempted from section 212(a)(4) of the Act as listed in § 212.23(a), the provisions of §§ 212.20 through 212.23 of this part apply to an applicant for admission or adjustment of status to that of a lawful permanent resident.

[87 FR 55636, Sept. 9, 2022]
#### § 101.106 Review by the Secretary.

Within 20 days after an initial decision becomes a final decision pursuant to § 101.104(a) or within 20 days of the mailing of a final decision referred to in § 101.104(b), as the case may be, a party may request the Secretary to review the final decision. The Secretary may grant or deny such request, in whole or in part, or serve notice of his intent to review the decision in whole or in part upon his own motion. If the Secretary grants the requested review, or if he serves notice of intent to review upon his own motion, each party to the decision shall have 20 days following notice of the Secretary's proposed action within which to file exceptions to the decision and supporting briefs and memoranda, or briefs and memoranda in support of the decision. Failure of a party to request review under this paragraph shall not be deemed a failure to exhaust administrative remedies for the purpose of obtaining judicial review.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ex rel. UTILITIES COMMISSION; NORTH CAROLINA NATURAL GAS CORPORATION (Applicant); and PUBLIC STAFF-NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION v. CAROLINA UTILITY CUSTOMERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

No. 9110UC168

(Filed 16 June 1992)

Utilities Commission § 22 (NCI3d)— natural gas —increased cost of additional supplies — rate increase —necessity for general rate case

The Utilities Commission was without authority to allow a natural gas utility to increase its rates pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 62-133(f) based on the increased cost of additional gas supplies since this matter should have been considered in a general rate case.

Am Jur 2d, Public Utilities §§ 138, 321.

*492APPEAL by intervenor Carolina Utility Customers Association, Inc. from an order of the North Carolina Utilities Commission entered 31 October 1990. Heard in the Court of Appeals 13 November 1991.

*McCoy, Weaver, Wiggins, Cleveland & Raper, by Donald W. McCoy and Jeffrey N. Surles, for applicant-appellee North Carolina Natural Gas Corporation.*

*Byrd, Byrd, Ervin, Whisnant, McMahon & Ervin, P.A., by Sam J. Ervin, IV, for intervenor-appellant.*

WELLS, Judge.

In an application dated 8 October 1990, North Carolina Natural Gas Corporation (hereinafter N.C.N.G.) applied to the North Carolina Utilities Commission (hereinafter the Commission) for permission to increase its rates to North Carolina customers. Carolina Utility Customers Association (hereinafter CUCA) was allowed to intervene, by order of the Commission dated 26 October 1990.

N.C.N.G.’s application was filed pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 62433(f). In its application, N.C.N.G. represented that it had arranged to receive additional natural gas supplies from Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Corporation (Transco), which would increase its overall cost of gas and requested permission to pass on this increased cost through various rate increases to its residential, commercial, and industrial customers.

CUCA, in its intervention, alleged that N.C.N.G.’s application should be considered only after a full evidentiary hearing in a general rate case proceeding under G.S. § 62433(a) through (c). The Commission denied CUCA’s request and allowed the proposed increases to go into effect.

For the same reasons stated in our opinion in *State of North Carolina ex rel. Utilities Commission et al v. Carolina Utility Customers Association, Inc. et al*(No. 911UC205, filed 19 May 1992), 106 N.C. App. 306, 416 S.E.2d 199 (1992), the Commission was without authority to allow the rate increase pursuant to the provisions of G.S. § 62433(f). Therefore, the order of the Commission under appeal in this case must be and is

Reversed and vacated.

Judges Eagles and Walker concur.
---

CERTIFICATION OF
  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dennis Petke, Chief Financial Officer of Aucxis Corp. (the Company),
  hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for the fiscal quarter
      ended March 31, 2004, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit
      32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                          

| | By:    | /s/ Dennis Petke       
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | DENNIS PETKE           
| |        |                        
| | Title: | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | May 12, 2004           

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10k9


                        HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
                           DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

              (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 1989)


                                Eighth Amendment


                 Houston Industries Incorporated, a Texas corporation (the
"Company"), having established the Houston Industries Incorporated Deferred
Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 1989 and as
thereafter amended (the "Plan"), and having reserved the right under Section
7.1 thereof to amend the Plan, does hereby amend the Plan, effective as of the
dates specified therein as follows:

                 1.       Section 1.2(o) of the Plan is hereby amended,
effective October 1, 1997, by adding the following to the end thereof:

         "From and after October 1, 1997, employment with STP Nuclear Operating
         Company shall be deemed to constitute 'Employment' with an Employer
         hereunder for all purposes except any such Employee shall not be
         eligible to make any additional deferrals of Compensation under the
         Plan."

                 2.       Section 5.1(b) of the Plan is hereby amended,
effective January 1, 1998, by striking the last sentence and inserting the
following in lieu thereof:

         "For purposes of determining a benefit payable in the form of fifteen
         (15) installment payments under this Section 5.1(b), the Interest
         Crediting Rate shall be the greater of (i) the Interest Crediting Rate
         in effect for the Plan Year in which an Employee Participant attains
         age sixty-five (65) or a Director Participant attains age seventy (70)
         or (ii) the Interest Crediting Rate in effect for the Plan Year
         immediately prior to which an Employee Participant attains age
         sixty-five (65) or a Director Participant attains age seventy (70).
         This Interest Crediting Rate will constitute the applicable Interest
         Crediting Rate for all years thereafter in which the Normal Retirement
         Distribution is paid or payable."

                 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Houston Industries Incorporated has caused
these presents to be executed by its duly authorized officer in a number of
copies, all of which shall constitute one
<PAGE>   2
and the same instrument, which may be sufficiently evidenced by any executed
copy hereof, this 13th day of November, 1997, but effective as of the dates
stated herein.

                                        HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED



                                        By   /s/ LEE W. HOGAN
                                          --------------------------------

ATTEST:

/s/ RICHARD B. DAUPHIN
-------------------------------
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before STEPHENS, DEERWESTER, and STARITA Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Andrew M. JOHNSON Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant No. 202000182 Decided: 14 January 2021 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Roger E. Mattioli Sentence adjudged 5 June 2020 by a general court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Virginia, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for 60 months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and a dishonorable discharge.

For Appellant: Commander C. Eric Roper, JAGC, USNR

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).United States v. Johnson , NMCCA No. 202000182 Opinion of the Court

2 _________________________ PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
# Official Journal C 19A/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2014.019.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 19A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5722 January 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2014.019.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 19A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5722 January 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Medicines Agency |
| 2014/C 019A/01 | Cancellation notice | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Medicines Agency

2014/C 019A/01

Cancellation notice

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |

5

6

11

19

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
### §7501. Definitions

In this chapter:

#### (1) Coastal county

The term "coastal county" has the meaning given the term by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in the document entitled "NOAA's List of Coastal Counties for the Bureau of the Census" (or similar successor document).

#### (2) Coastal State

The term "coastal State" has the meaning given the term "coastal state" in section 1453 of this title.

#### (3) Foundation

The term "Foundation" means the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation established by section 3701(a) of this title.

#### (4) Fund

The term "Fund" means the National Oceans and Coastal Security Fund established under section 7503(a) of this title.

#### (5) Indian tribe

The term "Indian tribe" means any federally recognized Indian tribe.

#### (6) Administrator

Except as otherwise specifically provided, the term "Administrator" means the Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

#### (7) Tidal shoreline

The term "tidal shoreline" has the meaning given that term pursuant to section 923.110(c)(2)(i) of title 15, Code of Federal Regulations, or a similar successor regulation.

(Pub. L. 114–113, div. O, title IX, §902, Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 3031.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 114–113, div. O, title IX, §901, Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 3031, provided that: "This title [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'National Oceans and Coastal Security Act'."
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 95429 / August 4, 2022

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20855

In the Matter of

Allianz Global Investors U.S. LLC,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

On May 4, 2022, the Commission issued an Omnibus Order Directing the Engagement of 

Two Tax Administrators for Appointment on a Case-By-Case Basis in Administrative 

Proceedings that Establish Distribution Funds (the “Omnibus Order”).1 The Omnibus Order 

engaged Miller Kaplan Arase LLP and Heffler, Radetich & Saitta, LLP to serve as a 

Commission tax administrator (“Tax Administrator”), for selection and appointment on an 

individual case basis, for calendar years 2022 through 2024 in administrative proceedings where 

the distribution fund may incur tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) 

under the Department of the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

The Director of the Division of Enforcement is authorized to appoint a Tax Administrator 

pursuant to the Omnibus Order.2 The Commission staff has requested the appointment of 

Heffler, Radetich & Saitta, LLP as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced 

proceeding.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the Omnibus Order, Heffler, Radetich & 

Saitta, LLP is appointed as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.3

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 94845 (May 4, 2022).

2

 See Delegation of Authority to Director of the Division of Enforcement, Securities Act Rel. No. 10900 (Dec. 10, 

2020).

3

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(ii).
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 74802 / April 23, 2015

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-14950

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

 :

CENTAUR MANAGEMENT : ORDER DIRECTING

CO. LLC : DISBURSEMENT OF

: FAIR FUND

Respondent. :

:

____________________________________:

On May 17, 2013, pursuant to Rule 1103 of the Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund 

and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1103, the Commission issued a Notice of 

Proposed Plan of Distribution and Opportunity for Comment (“Notice”) (Exchange Act 

Rel. No. 69604 (May 17, 2013)). The Notice provided all interested parties thirty (30) 

days to submit a comment on the Proposed Plan of Distribution (“Proposed Plan”). The 

Notice advised interested parties that they could obtain a copy of the Proposed Plan 

from the Commission’s public website or by submitting a written request to Anik A. 

Shah, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, 

Washington, DC 20549-5631. All persons who desired to comment on the Proposed 

Plan could submit their comments, in writing, no later than thirty (30) days from the 

date of the Notice. The Commission received no comments on the Proposed Plan. On 

July 22, 2013, the Commission issued an Order Approving Plan of Distribution 

(Exchange Act Rel. No. 70015 (July 22, 2013)). 

The Plan of Distribution (“Plan”) provides for the distribution of the Fair Fund, 

comprised of $172,438 in disgorgement, $41,884 in prejudgment interest, and 
2

$150,000 in civil penalty, less any federal, state or local taxes and costs and expenses 

of distributing the Fair Fund, when the Fund Administrator submits a list of payees 

with multiple identifiers and a “reasonable assurances letter” representing that the list 

of payees was compiled in accordance with the Plan, is accurate as to eligible 

recipients’ names, addresses, and disbursement amounts, and provides all information 

necessary to make disbursements to each eligible recipient. The Fund Administrator 

has submitted to Commission staff the list of payees and a “reasonable assurances 

letter.” Commission staff has reviewed the list of payees and “reasonable assurances 

letter” and requests that, pursuant to Rule 1101(b)(6) of the Commission’s Rules on 

Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(b)(6), the Commission 

authorize the transfer of $232,650.68 from the Fair Fund to the escrow account for 

distribution in accordance with the Plan.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Commission staff shall direct the transfer 

of $232,650.68 from the Fair Fund to the escrow account and that the Fund 

Administrator shall distribute such monies to eligible recipients as provided for in the 

Plan.

By the Commission.

Brent J. Fields

Secretary
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report of LegalPlay Entertainment Inc. on
     form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
     Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
     Mark Glusing, President and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
     certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
     the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;
     and
2.   The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

     /s/Mark Glusing
     Mark Glusing
     President, Acting CFO, November 19, 2004


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                          Page 6
<PAGE>
- Newsroom        - Press Releases
      - Public Statements
      - Speeches
      - Testimony
      - Spotlight Topics
      - Media Gallery
      - Upcoming Events
      - Webcasts
      - What's New
      - SEC Videos
      - Reports and Publications
      - RSS Feeds
      - Social Media 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

**FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:** 84 FR 58772, 1 November 2019

**PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:** Tuesday, November 5, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.

**CHANGES IN THE MEETING:** The following item will not be considered during the Open Meeting on Tuesday, November 5, 2019:

- The Commission will consider whether to propose amendments under the Advisers Act of 1940 to the rules that prohibit certain investment adviser advertisements and payments to solicitors.  

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:** For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman, Office of the Secretary, at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: November 4, 2019

Vanessa A. CountrymanSecretary
!"#$"%&%#

'()*+,+ '+  



 	
!$



+-./ 

0000000000000000000000000000000000000 



12	1

	(+.(3.+/.+1..	44/+	5/+++..	+

2(+/671.8:,++/+-3'()*+,+ '+;+-./6+/+(:.+/<+-./< +

*/.;(5/++=+.+4,+(5:,++/+(-+5:*,,3(+.+4/++;.+*/.

:.(.

(,-+/+2(; 62++/ (::+/+(2(1:(.	5/+++..

.+

+-./:(+/.(++:/*..+(.+	4/,>;>%%?;=.++*/+-3(++

:/*.:++(.+.+/+=.(*,3/+/+.+*-@+.
/4+/.3A(

> (..+2++/,(+*/+.+/+.+/.(/+(,4/4+/.3..,+.+(+:.+

+-./,(.+(.!"??B'+2(+;(,+;	>$CDB;*+E*.3;/5(6.+4/4+/.3 

$ (..+2++/(+-./ (++5(5+ :*/.+/ +..,++. * ( (+

/+(+((5/+++.=./+4+...+,(.+/:.+.+/+:+/+++-./F1.(

.++-./(.+2++/(+5+(	5/+++.1:35.+.+/:.+2(67	5/+++.8

=(-++:,+=..+*/.(*4/++=:.+	5/+++.;

.(.(	5/+++.:(/(/+((-,+ 

Case 16-36050-KRH Doc 23 Filed 10/27/17 Entered 10/27/17 09:01:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
.(..+,=+/.,34(3+.=,,/+*,.+-./-+5

(-,+.(G+4,(4(3+.=.+/((,(-,+.,3-*5+. 

.(..+/*.++=(+/+=..++-./H1. 

I	.+1.:.++-./(.+2(1:(.

	5/+++.+.+/+.-+.=++.+2++/(+-./+/+-3	

;.+.+/:=(/+

/+:+/+++-./F1.(-+,=;(=(/++.:/.(:,,=

(.(:1(/!;>%!B;.+
/4(,-(,(+:.+.+=(J&?;%&D ?D

64(
/4(,
(,(+

*//+..,34(3+.(/+J>$& C%6+.(.+
:J?!B >>=.

((@*.(-,+.+/+./(.+*//+.,3(.$ %CK 

(.(:1(/!;>%!B.+(44/E(.+4(3::-(,(+J&?;%&D ?D 

+*//+.(.*/.3(.+:.+.+'*+!;>%$?6//+.,3+.:/.

.+2(1:(.	5/+++.('*+!;>%?$ 

+1:+4(
/4(,
(,(+=,,-+J&?;%&D ?D 

(.+-./(,,(G+.,34(3+.:J!D" %$6+.(.+
:

J$!" !!=.(:E+.+/+./(.+:$ %CK 
(3+.=,,.(/.1(3!;

>%!B(,(.:/?C%.;=.(-(,,4(3+..+(*.:

JB>>C !B*+	4/,!;>%&B 

	++=(.*/.3(.+:.+.+=,,-+	4/,!;>%&B 

 	,,.+/.+/:.+.+(,,/+(+::+.+(+:/+(-,+(+.:/.

(.+ 

.(.+(,,(//+(/(+-++,*+.++=4/4(,

-(,(+:.+:+,(;.+/+-3.(..++-./(.+/*.++(/+/+,++

:/(G54(3+..+(//+(/,( 

5+.0000000(3:0000000000000000000000000;>%00 

000000000000000000000000000000000

.+.(.+
(G/*4.3'*5+

Oct 26 2017

/s/ Kevin R. Huennekens

Entered on Docket: Oct 27 2017

Case 16-36050-KRH Doc 23 Filed 10/27/17 Entered 10/27/17 09:01:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
  LL
/( .++  00000000


/( .++;
M>&DB?

	+/(2(=/*4; 

>$!>
*,+(/

,(,+5.;	>$C$?

C%?#&%"#%!BB64

C%?#&!C#&!>!6:(E

*+,:/+-./

		

LL0*N(+ I(+0000000000000000000000000000

*N(+ I(+;/*.++

2	22D%>>#!6	

1I.++-./;-3*+,(4*/*(..2(,*,+D%>>#!66!(+.+

*/..(..+:/+55/+/(-+++/+-3(,,.+++(/34(/.+ 

LL
/( .++00000000000000000000000000


/( .++

	









1I.++-./6;-3*+,;(4*/*(..,(,*,+D%>>#!6
6!(+.+

*/..(..+:,,=5(,.:(,,4(/.+.=.+:.++./3:/+/*,-+5+;.#

=.


/( .++

	+/(2(=/*4; 

*+,:/+-./6

>$!>
*,+(/

,(,+5.;	>$C$?

*N(+ I(+;/*.++


  
E!BC%

;	>$>!C

(,-+/+2(; 


  
E>?"!%

	

G,((.3;B$!>?

'+:+/ '+

!"??B'+2(+

(,+;	>$CDB

Case 16-36050-KRH Doc 23 Filed 10/27/17 Entered 10/27/17 09:01:41 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3