alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 10.32



                         LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS, INC.
                                200 Vesey Street
                               New York, NY 10285


                                 July 16, 1996


Mr. Barry Sternlicht
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Starwood Lodging Trust
11845 West Olympic Boulevard
Suite 550
Los Angeles, CA 90064


        RE: SLT REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Dear Barry:

        We hereby agree to extend the maturity of the Mortgage Loan Funding
Facility in the amount of approximately $71 million, dated July 25, 1995 and as
amended October 1995, due January 1997 for a six month period, to July 1997,
upon terms and conditions to be documented at a later date.





                                        Sincerely,



                                        LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS, INC.

                                        By /s/ Michael Mazz
                                           ---------------------------

                                        Its    Managing Director
                                            --------------------------
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nuance
Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles W. Berger, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



By:

/s/    CHARLES W. BERGERCharles W. BergerPresident and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 8, 2004
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         OF FLAG TELECOM GROUP LIMITED

    This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on
Form 10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for the three months ended June 30, 2003 of FLAG
Telecom Group Limited (the "Issuer").

    I, Patrick Gallagher, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer certify that:

    (i) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
        or 78o(d)); and

    (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Issuer.

    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and
will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: August 14, 2003.

<Table>
<S>                                               <C>    <C>
                                                  /s/ PATRICK GALLAGHER
                                                  --------------------------------------------------
                                                  Name:  Patrick Gallagher
</Table>
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 91647 / April 22, 2021

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-19816

In the Matter of

BitClave PTE, Ltd.,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

FUND ADMINISTRATOR 

AND SETTING BOND 

AMOUNT

On May 28, 2020, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist 

Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933, Making Findings, and 

Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”)1 against BitClave PTE, Ltd. (the “Respondent”). 

In the Order, the Commission found that from June 2017 through November 2017, BitClave 

offered and sold securities in the form of digital tokens, known as Consumer Activity Tokens 

(“CAT”), to fund the development of a blockchain-based search platform for targeted consumer 

advertising. As a part of this process, BitClave conducted an initial coin offering (“ICO” or the 

“Offering”) in which it raised approximately $25.5 million through the issuance of CAT. By 

their conduct, the Commission found that Respondent violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the 

Securities Act by failing to file a registration statement as to the Offering of CAT, and sold CAT 

to thousands of investors. The Commission ordered the Respondent to pay a total of 

$29,344,197.00 in disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil money penalties to the 

 

1

 Securities Act Rel. No. 10788 (May 28, 2020).
2

Commission, pursuant to a payment plan detailed therein. The Commission also created a Fair 

Fund, pursuant to Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, so the penalty, along with 

the disgorgement and interest, can be distributed to harmed investors (the “Fair Fund”).

The Fair Fund includes the $10,000,000.00 paid by the Respondent, and any additional 

funds paid pursuant to the Order will be added to the Fair Fund. 

The Division of Enforcement now seeks the appointment of Kurtzman Carlson 

Consultants (“KCC”) as the fund administrator and requests that the administrator’s bond be set 

at $10,000,000.00. KCC is included in the Commission’s approved pool of administrators.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that KCC is appointed as the fund 

administrator, pursuant to Rule 1105(a) of the Commission’s Rules of Fair Fund and 

Disgorgement Plans (“Commission’s Rules”),2 and shall obtain a bond in accordance with Rule 

1105(c) of the Commission’s Rules3in the amount of $10,000,000.00.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.4

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

2

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1105(a).

3

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1105(c).

4

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(17).
# EUR-Lex - 32003D0236 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 32003D0236

**2003/236/EC: Commission Decision of 3 April 2003 amending Decision 92/486/EEC establishing the form of cooperation between the Animo host centre and the Member States (Text with EEA relevance) (notified under document number C(2003) 1104) **

*
Official Journal L 087 , 04/04/2003 P. 0012 - 0012 *

Commission Decision

of 3 April 2003

amending Decision 92/486/EEC establishing the form of cooperation between the Animo host centre and the Member States

(notified under document number C(2003) 1104)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2003/236/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning the veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market(1), as last amended by Directive 2002/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(2), and in particular Article 20(3) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Pending the setting up of a new computer system architecture, in particular the part to be used for the Animo network, as defined in Commission Decision 2003/24/EC of 30 December 2002 concerning the development of an integrated computerised veterinary system(3), the continuity of that network should be ensured.

(2) Decision 92/486/EEC of 25 September 1992 establishing the form of cooperation between the Animo host centre and the Member States(4), as last amended by Decision 2002/615/EC(5), should be amended accordingly.

(3) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The first subparagraph of Article 2a(7) of Decision 92/486/EEC is replaced by the following:"For the period from 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004, the coordination authorities provided for in Article 1 shall ensure that the contracts referred to in that Article are extended for one year."

Article 2

This Decision shall apply from 1 April 2003.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 April 2003.

For the Commission

David Byrne

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 29.

(2) OJ L 315, 19.11.2002, p. 14.

(3) OJ L 8, 14.1.2003, p. 44.

(4) OJ L 291, 7.10.1992, p. 20.

(5) OJ L 196, 25.7.2002, p. 60.
----

(2004/C 78 E/0765)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-1504/03

by Elly Plooij-van Gorsel (ELDR) to the Commission

(5 May 2003)

Subject:   Measurability of GMO material in food products

The Commission proposal for a directive on traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is currently awaiting its second reading by the European Parliament. An important precondition and premise of the directive is that consumers must be able to choose between products which contain GMO material and those which do not.

On 28 November 2002 the Agriculture Council reached agreement on the Commission proposal, setting thresholds for determining whether or not a product would have to be labelled as containing GMO material.

The Council decided that there was no need to label a product as containing GMO material unless it contained at least 0,9 %.

At the same time a threshold of 0,5 % was set for adventitious GMO material which is not permitted but which an assessment has shown to be risk-free. This ‘tolerance threshold’ will remain in force for three years.

The Commission welcomed the Council's agreement. On 4 December 2002 the Commission inaugurated the European network of GMO laboratories. This network of 45 European laboratories will cooperate in the development of methods of tracing, identifying and quantifying GMOs and producing reference material.

The system for tracing GMOs will require suitable instruments and testing methods.

Answer given by Mr Busquin on behalf of the Commission

(17 July 2003)

----

(1)OJ C 113 E, 13.5.2003.

(2)OJ L 26, 30.1.2002.

----
### §690d. Injuries to property on Bear River Refuge; disturbance of birds, etc.; violation of regulations for use of refuge

No person shall take, injure, or disturb any bird, or nest or egg thereof, or injure or destroy any notice, signboard, fence, dike, ditch, dam, spillway, improvement, or other property of the United States on any area acquired or received under sections 690 to 690i of this title, or remove therefrom or cut, burn, injure, or destroy any grass or other natural growth thereon, or enter, use, or occupy the refuge for any purpose, except in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Interior: Provided, That at no time shall less than 60 per centum of the total acreage of the said refuge be maintained as an inviolate sanctuary for such migratory birds.

(Apr. 23, 1928, ch. 413, §5, 45 Stat. 449; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. II, §4(f), eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2731, 53 Stat. 1433.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 690i, included within the reference to sections 690 to 690i, was omitted from the Code.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Reorg. Plan No. II of 1939, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, transferred functions of Secretary of Agriculture relating to conservation of wildlife, game, and migratory birds to Secretary of the Interior.
# C_2016059EN.01000101.xml

| 15.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 59/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 59/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2016/C 059/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 48, 8.2.2016

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 38, 1.2.2016

OJ C 27, 25.1.2016

OJ C 16, 18.1.2016

OJ C 7, 11.1.2016

OJ C 429, 21.12.2015

OJ C 414, 14.12.2015

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Searched for **https://www.selectusa.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.selectusa.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
### §615a. Sale of timber in Alaska; appraisal; local consumption; accounting; deposit in Treasury

The Secretary of the Interior, under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, may cause to be appraised the timber or any part thereof upon public lands in Alaska, and may from time to time sell so much thereof as he may deem proper for not less than the appraised value thereof, in such quantities to each purchaser as he shall prescribe, to be used in Alaska except as aforesaid, but not for export therefrom except as provided under section 615b of this title. And such sales shall at all times be limited to actual necessities for consumption in Alaska from year to year, and payments for such timber shall be made to such officer as the Secretary of the Interior may designate of the local land office of the land district in which said timber may be sold, under such rules and regulations as the Secretary of the Interior may prescribe, and the moneys arising therefrom shall be accounted for by such officer as the Secretary of the Interior may designate to the Secretary of the Interior in a separate account, and shall be covered into the Treasury.

(May 14, 1898, ch. 299, §11, 30 Stat. 414; Oct. 28, 1921, ch. 114, §1, 42 Stat. 208; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1144; 1946 Reorg. Plan. No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of the first two sentences of section 11 of act May 14, 1898, the remainder of section 11 of act May 14, 1898, is classified to section 607a of this title.

Section was formerly classified to section 421 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Acts Oct. 28, 1921, and Mar. 3, 1925, consolidated offices of register and receiver and provided for a single officer to be known as register.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

Functions of Commissioner of General Land Office and registers transferred to Secretary of the Interior or that officer as the Secretary may designate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946, set out in the Appendix to Title 5.
### §460qqq. Purpose

The purpose of this subchapter is to establish the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area to conserve, protect, and enhance for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations the cultural, archaeological, natural, wilderness, scientific, geological, historical, biological, wildlife, educational, and scenic resources of the Conservation Area.

(Pub. L. 107–282, title VI, §602, Nov. 6, 2002, 116 Stat. 2009.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 107–282, §1, Nov. 6, 2002, 116 Stat. 1994, provided that: "This Act [enacting this subchapter, amending section 460ccc–1 of this title, enacting provisions set out as notes under this section and sections 460n–1, 460ccc–4, and 460qqq–1 of this title, enacting provisions listed in a table of National Wildlife Refuges set out under section 668dd of this title, and enacting and amending provisions listed in a table of Wilderness Areas set out under 1132 of this title] may be cited as the 'Clark County Conservation of Public Land and Natural Resources Act of 2002'."

Pub. L. 107–282, title VI, §601, Nov. 6, 2002, 116 Stat. 2009, provided that: "This title [enacting this subchapter] may be cited as the 'Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area Act'."
#### William Douth, Respondent, v. Rhinelander Waldo and Others, Appellants.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, without costs. Present— Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 5, 2014

d0825 

# Order

Clerk September 5, 2014

148284(59)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148284

COA: 310325

Oakland CC: 2011

- 236105

- FH

MARCUS MANDELLE KELLEY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 28,

2014 order is considered, and it is DENIE D, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
#### In Re ADMINISTRATION OF BERESFORD HOLDING CORPORATION. Appeal of ONTJES.

(252 N. W. 635.)

(File No. 7593.

Opinion filed February 13, 1934.)

*Alan Bogue,*of Parker, for Appellant.

/. *W. Kaye,*of Beresford, and *Caldwell & Burns,*of Sioux Falls, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This case involves the articles of agreement for the reorganization of the Beresford State Bank, and the agreement for the consolidation of the Beresford State Bank with the Security State Bank of Beresford, referred to in the case of Security State Bank of Beresford v. Beresford Holding Corporation, (No. 7614) 62 S. D. 231, 252 N. W. 631. he articles of agree*239ment for the reorganization of the Beresford State Bank provided that the slow, doubtful, and frozen assets of the bank in an amount constituting 70 per cent should be administered as a trust fund for the benefit of depositors. In pursuance of the trust agreement, the appellant Ontjes and two others were named as trustees, to take charge of and administer the $3,000 cash bonus referred to in the trust. While acting in the capacity of trustee, the $3,000 cash bonus referred to in the consolidation agreement, set out in the opinion in case No. 7614, came into the hands of Ontjes. Ontjes, who was the one actively engaged in the administration of the trust fund, filed a final account of bis administration of said trust with the circuit court, and a petition wherein he asked that this account be approved. The account failed to specify the $3,000 cash bonus referred to in the consolidation agreement and which is admitted Ontjes received. Objections were filed to the account based upon the failure of Ontjes to report this $3,000. At the hearing upon the account, Ontjes maintained that this $3,000 payment was made for the benefit of him and one Sundstrom upon their agreement not to engage in the banking business in Beresford. Evidence was submitted relative to the object and purpose of this $3,000 payment designated in the consolidation agreement as a bonus, and the trial court concluded: “That the said bonus of $3,000, raised and paid by the First National Bank and the Security State Bank of Beresford, South Dakota, and referred to in finding of fact No. 15, herein, was raised for the purpose of having the reorganized Beresford State Bank, consolidate with the Security State Bank of Beresford and cancel its charter and go out of business permanently, and therefore the said $3,000.00, does not belong to the said J. A. Ontjes and Robert P. Sundstrom, but does belong to and should inure to the benefit of all of the creditors of the said trust estate and Beresford Holding Corporation.”

Upon the record as presented, we are of the opinion that that portion of the order appealed from must be, and it is, affirmed.

All the Judges concur.
### §797a. Congressional authorization for permits, licenses, leases, or authorizations for dams, conduits, reservoirs, etc., within national parks or monuments

On and after March 3, 1921, no permit, license, lease, or authorization for dams, conduits, reservoirs, power houses, transmission lines, or other works for storage or carriage of water, or for the development, transmission, or utilization of power within the limits as constituted, March 3, 1921, of any national park or national monument shall be granted or made without specific authority of Congress.

(Mar. 3, 1921, ch. 129, 41 Stat. 1353.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Provisions repealing so much of this chapter "as authorizes licensing such uses of existing national parks and national monuments by the Federal Power Commission" have been omitted.

Section was not enacted as part of the Federal Power Act which generally comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Construction

Act Aug. 26, 1935, ch. 687, title II, §212, 49 Stat. 847, provided that nothing in this chapter should be construed to repeal or amend the provisions of the act approved Mar. 3, 1921 (41 Stat. 1353) [16 U.S.C. 797a] or the provisions of any other Act relating to national parks and national monuments. See note preceding section 791 of this title.
SERVED: JUNE 24, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF CALIBER JET CHARTER, LLC DOCKETNO. FAA-2015-1320 (Civil Penalty Action)
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2014EA390060) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAAHearing Docket, andthe other persons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service List

### ~~-·- { \ \ ,/

.·**~­**

. --·--Ronme A. Yo er /,// Chief

### Administrativ~\V Judge

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. 

### MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

Michael Asseff, Respondent's Counsel 29550 Detroit Road Westlake, OH 44145 TEL: 440-521-1658 

### ONE COPY

Judith 

### L. Vaughan, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, Eastern Region Federal Aviation Administration 1 Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3255 FAJ<: 718-995-5699 Hon. J.E. Sullivan,Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAJ<: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2015-1320 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-