alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Docket No. FAA- J...OIO-II qq

Regulatory Evaluation

Complete when issuing a supplemental NPRM, revision, or supersedure.

(g] No Change from existing AD action

If)-NM -J.-.J--5-A [)

Directorate Identifier: d-O -7\D

Estimated Costs: (Include costs for the entire AD, no/ jus/the chon es!

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft,

Action en"ine, propeller, appliance)

(e.g., Inspection, Work-hours Labor Parts Total Costs Number of Total Cost

(include access, cost Cost (labor + U.S. for U.S. replacement) testing, and (@$851 parts) Registered Fleet

close-up) hour) Products

) il,qO , _(II; $ 0

\ luju :-, (. '\1 $ 0

-

:I 0\1 ,II ',I', $ 0

,'! (if)

,

(\ 11,. S 0

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of comoliance for U.S. neet: $

Costs covered under warrantv $

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use Ihisjield 10explain anything in the £Slimated Costs table that

was assumed or might not be obvious. Thisfield can also be used to explain warranty COSIS):

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

YES' 0 NOI2J

*Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: I

Is the AD significant? •

YES' 0 NO I2J

*Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a subsrantial number of small entities? Explain for

either a Yes or No answer. •

YES 0 NO I2J

Explanation:

Intrastate A"jation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? ~

YES' 0 NOI2J

*Explanation:
### §4914. Marking and recordkeeping

#### (a) In general

The Secretary is authorized to promulgate regulations to require marking or recordkeeping that the Secretary determines will contribute significantly to the ability of the Secretary to ensure compliance with the prohibitions of section 4910 of this title, for—

(1) any exotic bird that is imported after October 23, 1992; or

(2) any other exotic bird that is—

(A) hatched after October 23, 1992;

(B) offered for sale; and

(C) of a species—

(i) the export of which from any country of origin is prohibited; and

(ii) that is subject to a high level of illegal trade.

#### (b) Avoiding deterrence of breeding

The Secretary shall seek to ensure that regulations promulgated under this section will not have the effect of deterring captive breeding of exotic birds.

(Pub. L. 102–440, title I, §115, Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2232.)
IN RE: Case No.:

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY

Debtors: Carey J. Gillespie and Hope E. Gillespie

16-33348

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(a). Transferee hereby gives evidence and 

notice pursuant to Rule 3001(e)(2), Fed. R. Bankr. P., of the transfer, other than for security, of the claim referenced in this evidence 

and notice.

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee, 

on behalf of the holders of the J.P. Morgan Mortgage 

Acquisition Trust 2007CH3 Asset Backed PassThrough 

Certificates, Series 2007CH3

Serviced by Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.

Name of Transferee

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

Eastern District of Virginia (Richmond)

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and 

belief.

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Attn: Correspondence Mail

Name of Transferor

3217 S. Decker Lake Dr.

Salt Lake City, UT 84115

866-247-1722

PO Box 65450

Salt Lake City, UT 84165

866-247-1722

4340

Name and Address where transferee payments should be sent (if different from above):

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571.

Date: 04/28/2017

Phone: 

Last Four Digits of Acct #: 4340

Court Claim # (if known):

Amount of Claim:

Date Claim Filed:

Last Four Digits of Acct #:

Phone: 

Last Four Digits of Acct #:

11

$383,545.38

11/23/2016

5398

By:

BK Management

/s/ Gina Hiatt

471731-597ec79e-ca4c-484a-864f-7c1fd976bdde

Specific Contact Information:

P: 800-258-8602

Loan Number (Last 4): 4340

B2100A (Form 2100A) (12/15) Case 16-33348-KLP Doc 38 Filed 04/28/17 Entered 04/28/17 13:56:48 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
### §6904. Rulemaking authority of the Secretary of Commerce

#### (a) Promulgation of regulations

The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of State and, with respect to enforcement measures, the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating, is authorized to promulgate such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the United States international obligations under the WCPFC Convention and this chapter, including recommendations and decisions adopted by the Commission. In cases where the Secretary has discretion in the implementation of one or more measures adopted by the Commission that would govern fisheries under the authority of a Regional Fishery Management Council, the Secretary may, to the extent practicable within the implementation schedule of the WCPFC Convention and any recommendations and decisions adopted by the Commission, promulgate such regulations in accordance with the procedures established by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.).

#### (b) Additions to fishery regimes and regulations

The Secretary may promulgate regulations applicable to all vessels and persons subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, including United States flag vessels wherever they may be operating, on such date as the Secretary shall prescribe.

(Pub. L. 109–479, title V, §505, Jan. 12, 2007, 120 Stat. 3639.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 94–265, Apr. 13, 1976, 90 Stat. 331, which is classified principally to chapter 38 (§1801 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1801 of this title and Tables.
§ 222.187 Which year's data must an SEA or LEA provide? ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the Secretary will determine eligibility under this discretionary program based on student and fiscal data for each LEA from the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year for which the applicant is applying for funds.
( b ) If satisfactory fiscal data are not available from the preceding fiscal year, the Secretary will use data from the most recent fiscal year for which data that are satisfactory to the Secretary are available.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7707(b))
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 07162

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 07162\07162_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

07162\07162_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 07162\07162_Email Correspondence.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

07162\07162_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 07162\07162_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07162\07162_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07162\07162_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07162\07162_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07162\07162_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

07162\Certification Statment Plant ID 07162.pdf Plant certification statement

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
HHRIKTITIAn 

SINC E 189 4 

ii^RTivlENTOF 

^-'ASPORTATION 

-..•:--cTOFFRATIONS 

February 9, 2012 

Docket Management Facility 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140. 

.Washington. DC 20590., . . _ . . 

Re: Sun Countr y Slot Exemptio n - Docke t Numbe r FAA-2012-0089 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Sun Country Airlines has requested an exemption from the slot limit for Ronald Reagan Washington 

National Airport (DCA) set forth in § 93.123(a). to permit the FAA to create air carrier slots during 

certain limited hours for Sun Country's use. The proposed air carrier slots would replace two slot 

exemptions under DO T Order 2010-12-16 awarded to Sun Country. On January 6, 2012. the United 

States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated the DO T Order, and Sun Country 

will lose its existing service between DCA and Lansing's Capital Region International Airport. 

Specifically. Sun Country desires one daily slot during each of the 1000 and I 100 hours. The proposed 

exemption would permit Sun Country to continue operating its existing services and avoid an 

inequitable result of the Court's order. 

The Sun Country DCA service is essential to the economic growth of the Greater Lansing Region. The 

daily service is the only large aircraft (737-800) service to Washington Reagan Airport, in the state of 

Michigan outside of DetroiL Prior to Sun Country, the regional community had requested the 

introduction of this service from numerous other airline operators without success. Accordingly, it is 

critical that the FAA take the necessary steps to ensure the continuation of the Sun Country slots at the 

established flight times in support of Greater Lansing's business and economic growth. 

Your immediate approval of this exemption, so that Sun Country can begin to enter flights schedules for 

sale for the balance of 2012. will be gready appreciated. 

Sincerely, 

T h e Christma n Compan y 

les M. Cash 

Executive Vice President 

The Chrisimjn Company The Cfirisijnar Buildmg 208 N C.ipnol Avenu? L.irising Michig.in •18933-I 3S7
§ 231.2 Electronic manifest and I-94 requirement for passengers and crew onboard departing vessels and aircraft. ( a ) *Electronic submission of manifests.* Provisions setting forth requirements applicable to commercial carriers regarding the electronic transmission of departure manifests covering passengers and crew members under section 231 of the Act are set forth in 19 CFR 4.64 (passengers and crew members onboard vessels) and in 19 CFR 122.75a (passengers onboard aircraft) and 122.75b (crew members onboard aircraft).
( b ) *Submission of Form I-94* — ( 1 ) *General requirement.* In addition to the electronic manifest transmission requirement specified in paragraph (a) of this section, and subject to the exception of paragraph (2) of this paragraph (b), the master or commanding officer, or authorized agent, owner, or consignee, of each commercial vessel or aircraft departing from the United States to any place outside the United States must present a properly completed departure portion of an Arrival/Departure Record, Form I-94 (see § 1.4), to the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer at the port of departure for each person on board. Whenever possible, the departure Form I-94 presented must be the same form given to the alien at the time of arrival in the United States. The carrier must endorse the I-94 with the departure information on the reverse of the form. Submission of the I-94 to the CBP officer must be accomplished within 48 hours of the departure, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays. Failure to submit the departure I-94 within this period may be regarded as a failure to comply with section 231(g) of the Act, unless prior authorization for delayed delivery is obtained from CBP. A non-immigrant alien departing on an aircraft proceeding directly to Canada on a flight terminating in that country must surrender any Form I-94 in his/her possession to the airline agent at the port of departure.
( 2 ) *Exceptions.* The form I-94 requirement of paragraph (1) of this paragraph (b) does not apply to United States citizens, lawful permanent residents of the United States, or passengers in transit through the United States; nor does it apply to a vessel or aircraft departing on a trip directly for and terminating in Canada or departing from the United States Virgin Islands directly to the British Virgin Islands on a trip terminating there.
( c ) *Aircraft/Vessel Report.* A properly completed Aircraft/Vessel Report, Form I-92, must be completed for each departing aircraft and vessel that is transporting passengers. Submission of the Form I-92 to the CBP officer must be accomplished on the day of departure.
[70 FR 17849, Apr. 7, 2005, as amended at 78 FR 18472, Mar. 27, 2013]
HECO Exhibit 32.3

Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc.

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer Furnished Pursuant
to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted by

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc. (HECO) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the HECO Report), I, T. Michael May, Chief Executive Officer of HECO, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge, that:



|(1) | The HECO Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The HECO consolidated information contained in the HECO Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition as of December 31, 2006 and results of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 of HECO and its subsidiaries.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ T. Michael May                   
|T. Michael May                       
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date: February 28, 2007              

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hawaiian Electric
Company, Inc. and will be retained by Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Official Journal C 431/29 N

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 431 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6129 November 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 431

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6129 November 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COURT OF AUDITORS |
| 2018/C 431/01 | Opinion No 5/2018 (pursuant to Articles 287(4) and 322(2) TFEU) concerning: (a) the proposal for a Council Decision on the system of own resources of the European Union (COM(2018) 325 final); (b) the proposal for a Council Regulation on the methods and procedure for making available the Own Resources based on the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base, on the European Union Emissions Trading System and on Plastic packaging waste that is not recycled, and on the measures to meet cash requirements (COM(2018) 326 final); and (c) the proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1553/89 on the definitive uniform arrangements for the collection of own resources accruing from value added tax (COM(2018) 328 final) | 1 |

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COURT OF AUDITORS

2018/C 431/01

Opinion No 5/2018 (pursuant to Articles 287(4) and 322(2) TFEU) concerning: (a) the proposal for a Council Decision on the system of own resources of the European Union (COM(2018) 325 final); (b) the proposal for a Council Regulation on the methods and procedure for making available the Own Resources based on the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base, on the European Union Emissions Trading System and on Plastic packaging waste that is not recycled, and on the measures to meet cash requirements (COM(2018) 326 final); and (c) the proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1553/89 on the definitive uniform arrangements for the collection of own resources accruing from value added tax (COM(2018) 328 final)

(pursuant to Articles 287(4) and 322(2) TFEU)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Case 18-74050-FJS Doc 16 Filed 12/05/18 Entered 12/05/18 09:23:17 Desc MainDocument Page 1 of 11Case 18-74050-FJS Doc 16 Filed 12/05/18 Entered 12/05/18 09:23:17 Desc MainDocument Page 2 of 11Case 18-74050-FJS Doc 16 Filed 12/05/18 Entered 12/05/18 09:23:17 Desc MainDocument Page 3 of 11Case 18-74050-FJS Doc 16 Filed 12/05/18 Entered 12/05/18 09:23:17 Desc MainDocument Page 4 of 11Case 18-74050-FJS Doc 16 Filed 12/05/18 Entered 12/05/18 09:23:17 Desc MainDocument Page 5 of 11Case 18-74050-FJS Doc 16 Filed 12/05/18 Entered 12/05/18 09:23:17 Desc MainDocument Page 6 of 11Case 18-74050-FJS Doc 16 Filed 12/05/18 Entered 12/05/18 09:23:17 Desc MainDocument Page 7 of 11Case 18-74050-FJS Doc 16 Filed 12/05/18 Entered 12/05/18 09:23:17 Desc MainDocument Page 8 of 11Case 18-74050-FJS Doc 16 Filed 12/05/18 Entered 12/05/18 09:23:17 Desc MainDocument Page 9 of 11Case 18-74050-FJS Doc 16 Filed 12/05/18 Entered 12/05/18 09:23:17 Desc MainDocument Page 10 of 11Case 18-74050-FJS Doc 16 Filed 12/05/18 Entered 12/05/18 09:23:17 Desc MainDocument Page 11 of 11
§ 300.179 Notice and hearing before determining that a State is not eligible to receive a grant. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) The Secretary does not make a final determination that a State is not eligible to receive a grant under Part B of the Act until providing the State— ( i ) With reasonable notice; and
( ii ) With an opportunity for a hearing.
( 2 ) In implementing paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, the Secretary sends a written notice to the SEA by certified mail with return receipt requested.
( b ) *Content of notice.* In the written notice described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the Secretary— ( 1 ) States the basis on which the Secretary proposes to make a final determination that the State is not eligible;
( 2 ) May describe possible options for resolving the issues;
( 3 ) Advises the SEA that it may request a hearing and that the request for a hearing must be made not later than 30 days after it receives the notice of the proposed final determination that the State is not eligible; and
( 4 ) Provides the SEA with information about the hearing procedures that will be followed.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(d)(2))
# C_2005281EN.01001302.xml

| 12.11.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/13

---

Action brought on 22 September 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-353/05)

(2005/C 281/25)

Language of the case: French

An action against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 22 September 2005 by the Commission of the European Communities, represented by Bernard Schima and Florence Simonetti, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission of the European Communities claims that the Court should:

| 1. | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Dircetive 2003/54/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 96/92 EC and, in any event, by not informing the Commission of their adoption, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Dircetive 2003/54/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 96/92 EC and, in any event, by not informing the Commission of their adoption, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| 2. | order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for implementing the Directive expired on 1 July 2004.

---

(1)  OJ L 176 of 15.07.2003, p. 37

1

---
EX-99.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FreeStar Technology
Corporation ("Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof ("Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on
the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his
knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request


Dated: May 19, 2003                     /s/ Paul Egan
                                        Paul Egan, President


Dated: May 19, 2003                     /s/ Ciaran Egan
                                        Ciaran Egan, Chief Financial Officer
#### § 420.101 What is the purpose of this part?

This part prescribes the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) policies and procedures for the administration of activities undertaken by State departments of transportation (State DOTs) and their subrecipients, including metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs), with FHWA planning and research funds. Subpart A identifies the administrative requirements that apply to use of FHWA planning and research funds both for planning and for research, development, and technology transfer (RD&T) activities. Subpart B describes the policies and procedures that relate to the approval and authorization of RD&T work programs. The requirements in this part supplement those in 49 CFR part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments and 49 CFR part 19, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals and Other Non-Profit Organizations.