alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §554e. Employment of workers for emergencies

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, on and after October 21, 1998, the Forest Service is authorized to employ or otherwise contract with persons at regular rates of pay, as determined by the Service, to perform work occasioned by emergencies such as fires, storms, floods, earthquakes or any other unavoidable cause without regard to Sundays, Federal holidays, and the regular workweek.

(Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(e) [title II], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–231, 2681–273.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Similar Provisions

Provisions similar to this section were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 105–83, title II, Nov. 14, 1997, 111 Stat. 1577.

Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(d) [title II], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–181, 3009–208.

Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101(c) [title II], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–156, 1321–185; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327.

Pub. L. 103–332, title II, Sept. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 2524.

Pub. L. 103–138, title II, Nov. 11, 1993, 107 Stat. 1404.

Pub. L. 102–381, title II, Oct. 5, 1992, 106 Stat. 1402.

Pub. L. 102–154, title II, Nov. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1019.

Pub. L. 101–512, title II, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1944.
Order entered October 3 1 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 12
- 01599
- CV VICTOR MALDONADO, Appellant
V. SUMEER HOMES, INC., ET AL. , Appellee s On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 10
- 01137
- E 

### O RDER
We GRANT appellant’s October 28, 2013 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file reply briefs in response to the respective briefs filed by appellees. Appellant shall file his reply briefs on or before No vember 22, 2013.

/s/ DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE
#### Charles E. Freet, Doing Business as the Fyricide Manufacturing Company, Respondent, v. The Standard Scale and Supply Company, Appellant.

Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
#### § 222.4 How does the Secretary determine when an application is timely filed?

To be timely filed under § 222.3, an application must be received by the Secretary on or before the applicable filing date.

[62 FR 35412, July 1, 1997, as amended at 80 FR 33162, June 11, 2015]
& U.S
. Departmen t o fTransportatio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Ne wEnglan d Regio n Offic e o ftti e Regiona l Counse l I vil;, ! lU^ i "1 2 Ne wEnglan d Executiv e Par k Burlington , M A01803-529 9 Telephone : (781)238-704 5 • . . ; FAX : (781)238-705 5



## m i - 8 

## 2010 

## HEARIN G DOCKE T Jun e 7 , 201 0 FEDERA LEXPRES S AN D FACSIMIL E(202 ) 366-753 6 Th e Honorabl e Isaa c D
. Benki n Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Washington , D.C
. 2059 0 I rtv;^ ^^^"^91 1 Re : Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio nv . City o f Bridgeport , Connecticu t Docke t No
. CP09NE000 1 Dear Judg e Benkin : Enclosed , pleas e findComplainant' s Withdrawa l o f Complain t

i nth e above-captione dCivi l Penalt y Action
. Fo r you r information , I hav e als o bee nauthorize db y th e City' s Attorne y t o indicat e that Responden t

likewis e withdraw s it s reques t for hearing
. Th e partie s respectfull y than k yo u for you r attentio nt o thi s matter . Sincerely ,

JOHNR
. DONNELL Y Senio r Attorne y Enclosure s
cc : Richar dKascak , Jr. , Esquir e Hearin g Docke t' "''
. 7:"^' - ^'"'"• i if^^' 1 • ! » UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATION ! Wt" " ^ ^

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C
. 

# n

- ?
. 201 0

• 0 DOCKE T FEDERA LAVIATIO N ADMINISTRATION , Complainant , V
. CIT Y O FBRIDGEPORT , CONNECTICU T Respondent
. FA ADocke t No. : CP09NE000 1 Administrativ e La w Judg e Isaa c D
. Benki n Date : Jun e 7 , 201 0
WITHDRAWA LO FCOMPLAIN T Th e partie s i nth e above-captione daction , hav e settle dthi s cas e an dpursuan t t o Sectio n13.21 5 o f

th e Rule s o f

Practic e i nFA ACivi l Penalt y Actions , 1 4 C.F.R
. 13.215 , Complainan t

hereb y withdraw s it s Complaint
. Respectfull y submitted ,

R
. DONNELL Y "Senior Attorne y Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l 1 2 Ne w Englan dExecutiv e Park Burlington , Massachusetts , 01803-529 9 Telephon e (781 ) 238-704 5 Facsimil e (781 ) 238-705 5 Email : john.donnelly(gfaa.go vCERTIFICAT EO FSERVIC E I hereb y certif

y that today , Jun e 7 , 2010, 1 hav e sen t viaFedera l Expres s an d Facsimil e anorigina l cop y o f th e Withdrawa l o f

Complaint , addresse dt o th e following : Th e Honorabl e Isaa c D
. Benki n(Original ) Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Washington , D.C
. 2059 0 Fax : (202 ) 366-753 6 Richar dG
. Kascak , Jr. , Esquir e Associat e City Attorne y Offic e o f th e City Attorne y 99 9 Broa dStreet , T' ^ Floo r Bridgeport , Connecticu t

06604-432 8 Fax : (203 ) 576-825 2 Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n Wilbu r Wrigh t Building-Suit e 2W100 0 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Washington , D C 2059 1


## ihu\CUyCfle4ij^

- DONN ASORENSE NJun e 7 , 201 0 Progra mAnalys t
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR EQUIVALENT

PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth
below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report of Hitachi, Ltd. on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Hiroaki Nakanishi, President of Hitachi, Ltd., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hitachi, Ltd.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                                
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------
|Date:    June 24, 2011 |  | By: |  | /s/ Hiroaki Nakanishi          
|                       |  |     |  | Name:         Hiroaki Nakanishi
|                       |  |     |  | Title:           President
<PAGE>   1


                            HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY
                                   EXHIBIT 23
                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 2-69298, 33-59015, 33-51098, and 333-58377) pertaining
to the Houghton Mifflin Company 401(k) Savings Plan, the 1992 Stock Compensation
Plan, the 1995 Stock Compensation Plan, and the 1998 Stock Compensation Plan of
Houghton Mifflin Company and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.
33-64903) of Houghton Mifflin Company and in the related prospectuses pertaining
to the $300 million debt securities of our report dated January 26, 1999, except
for the third paragraph in Note 14, as to which the date is February 28, 1999,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Houghton
Mifflin Company included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1998.



                                             Ernst & Young LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 25, 1999






                                       66
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Tony Muro, Respondent, against David R. Longnecker et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board et al., Respondents.

All concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher WILLS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-7725.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 29, 2002.

Decided May 10, 2002.

*127Arcangelo M. Tuminelli, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Thomas M. DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Tarra DeShields-Minnis, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Wills appeals the district court order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion for modification of his sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000). Wills argued he qualified for a sentence reduction under Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 599, *U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*App. C (Supp.2000), which amended the application notes of USSG § 2K2.4. The district court found Wills was not entitled to a reduction of sentence as a matter of law. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

The district court’s legal interpretation of Amendment 599 is reviewed de novo. *See United States v. Turner,*59 F.3d 481, 484 (4th Cir.1995). Commentary interpreting or explaining a guideline is authoritative unless it violates federal law or is inconsistent with or a plainly erroneous reading of the guideline. *See Stinson v. United States,*508 U.S. 36, 38, 113 S.Ct. 1913, 123 L.Ed.2d 598 (1993).

Amendment 599 clarified “under what circumstances defendants sentenced for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) in conjunction with convictions for other offenses may receive weapon enhancements contained in the guidelines for those other offenses.” USSG App. C, Amendment 599, comment, (backg’d). We have reviewed the record and the language of the amended guideline and find Wills is not entitled to a reduction of sentence under a plain reading of the text. *See United States v. Dixon,*273 F.3d 636, 643-44 (5th Cir.2001), *petition for cert. filed,*- U.S.L.W. - (U.S. Apr. 3, 2002) (01-9579).

Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          31,350
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  602,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,649
<INVENTORY>                                    423,546
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,156,885
<PP&E>                                         491,484
<DEPRECIATION>                                 199,364
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,490,963
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          861,298
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,243
<OTHER-SE>                                     602,623
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,470,963
<SALES>                                      1,226,608
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,226,608
<CGS>                                          518,548
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                    96,442
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             96,442
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    96,442
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
### §410ff–7. Expenditure of Federal funds for research, resources management, and visitor protection and use on private property; transfer of funds; authorization of appropriations

The Secretary is authorized to expend Federal funds for the cooperative management of The Nature Conservancy and other private property for research, resources management, and visitor protection and use. All funds authorized to be appropriated for the purposes of the Channel Islands National Monument are hereby transferred to the Channel Islands National Park. Effective October 1, 1980, there are hereby authorized to be appropriated such further sums as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this subchapter, but not to exceed $500,000 for development. From the Land and Water Conservation Fund there is authorized to be appropriated $30,100,000 for the purposes of land acquisition. For the authorizations made in this section, any amounts authorized but not appropriated in any fiscal year shall remain available for appropriation in succeeding fiscal years.

(Pub. L. 96–199, title II, §208, Mar. 5, 1980, 94 Stat. 77.)
(No. 78-CC-0750

#### Edwin Calex, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed May 12, 1978.*

Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was *292allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas v. State, 32*Ill.Ct.Cl.__, this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
#### Aaron HOLSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Melanie C. PEREIRA, individually, and as former deputy commissioner of corrections for Maryland at 6776 Reisterstown Road, Baltimore, Maryland 21215; Supervisor, name unknown, Home Detention Unit, individually, and in official capacity at 2100 Guilford Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21218; State of Maryland Department of Corrections, corrections headquarters, 6776 Reisterstown Road, Baltimore, Maryland 21215; Patricia K. Cushwa, individually, and as chairperson of the Maryland Parole Commission at 6776 Reisterstown Road, Baltimore, Maryland 21203; Frank Pappas, individually, and as Maryland Parole Commissioner; Maceo Williams, individually and as Maryland Parole Commissioner; Ralph Robinson, individually, and as Facility Administrator for Baltimore City Pre-Release Facility, 926 Greenmount Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21202; D. Thaniel, individually, and as supervisor of classification department at Baltimore City Pre-Release Unit; Susan T. Donahue, individually, and as former supervisor of classification at Eastern Correctional Institution-annex, 30420 Revells Neck Road, Westover, Maryland 21890; Alvin McCoy; Carter Donaway, individually, and as a work release counselor assigned to the Baltimore City Pre-Release Unit; Eleu Gatling, individually, and as a work release counselor assigned to the Baltimore City Pre-Release Unit; C. Weston, individually, and a work release counselor assigned to the Baltimore City Pre-Release Unit; Michile Anthony Blount, Commissioner, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-8045.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 17, 2002.

Decided May 22, 2002.

Aaron Holsey, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, David Phelps Kennedy, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before WILKINS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

*944PER CURIAM.

Aaron Holsey appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Holsey v. Pereira,*No. CA-01-898-JFM (D.Md. Nov. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
**Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-4 Nos.333-101310 and 333-106887-01; Form S-3 Nos. 333-96715, 333-96715-01, 333-89310, 333-89130-76,333-106888 and 333-106888-01; and Form S-8 Nos. 333-115926, 333-115926-01, 333-97469, 333-97469-01,333-111384 and 333-111384-01) of Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. and Starwood Hotels &Resorts (the “Company”) and in the related Prospectuses of our reports dated March 2, 2006, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of the Company, Starwood Hotels &Resorts Worldwide, Inc. and Starwood Hotels & Resorts management’s assessment of the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting of the Company, included in this Joint Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the yearended December 31, 2005.      ERNST & YOUNG LLP
### §973p. Additional agreements

Within 30 days after the Secretary of State's receipt of notice from a Pacific Island Party that it has concluded an arrangement pursuant to paragraph 3 of Article 3 of the Treaty, the Secretary of State shall consult with the Secretary concerning whether the procedures of Article 4 and paragraph 6 of Article 5 of the Treaty should be made applicable to such arrangement. At the conclusion of the consultations the Pacific Island Party and all other persons agreeing to the arrangement shall be notified by the Secretary of State of the resulting decision.

(Pub. L. 100–330, §18, June 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 600.)
# Official Journal C 88A/12 A

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 88A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4812 April 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 88A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4812 April 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | Council |
| 2005/C 088A/1 | Notice of temporary vacancy — Reference: B/018 — Social worker | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

Council

2005/C 088A/1

Notice of temporary vacancy — Reference: B/018 — Social worker

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

III Notices

Council

| 12.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 88/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 88/1

---

NOTICE OF TEMPORARY VACANCY

Reference: B/018

SOCIAL WORKER

(2005/C 88 A/01)

The General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union is looking to fill a temporary vacancy for a category B*, grade 5 post in Directorate A 1B, Personnel and Administration, located in Brussels.

The Social Service of the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union provides officials and their families as well as retired officials with help and support in difficult situations. Its main tasks also include facilitating the integration of new officials and their families as well as the reconciliation of private and professional life and the establishment of close links with retired colleagues.

Further information and application forms can be obtained by contacting the Selection and Recruitment Department at the following e-mail address:

service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int

or via its website at

http://ue.eu.int/concours

Deadline: 10 May 2005, the postmark serving as proof.

---
EXHIBIT 99.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the  accompanying  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of North Bay
Bancorp for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, I, Terry L. Robinson, President and
Chief  Executive  Officer of North Bay Bancorp,  hereby  certify  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:

(1) such  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of North Bay  Bancorp  for the  quarter
ended June 30, 2002,  fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of North Bay
Bancorp for the quarter ended June 30, 2002,  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of North Bay
Bancorp.

Dated:  August13,  2002


                                /s/ Terry L. Robinson
                                -------------------------------------
                                TERRY L. ROBINSON
                                President and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Richmond Division

In re:

 ANTONIO SHELTON

 DIANE ELIZABETH SHELTON 

 Debtor(s)

Case No. 17-31557-KRH

Chapter 7

REPORT OF DEPOSIT OF UNCLAIMED FUNDS

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3011 and 11 U.S.C. §347, the trustee herein submits a 

check payable to “Clerk, United States Bankruptcy Court” representing unclaimed funds / small dividends

to be deposited by the Clerk of the Court into the Treasury of the United States. Said funds are subject to 

withdrawal as provided by 28 U.S.C. 2042 and shall not escheat under any state law. The unclaimed 

funds represent the dividend(s) due and payable to:

Creditor’s Name and Address Amount of Dividend

Lori Senora Waddell $ 4,083.09

5481 Mayfair Crossing Drive

Lithonia, GA 30038

 

Dated: April 6, 2021 /s/ Bruce E. Robinson

Bruce E. Robinson, Trustee

P. O. Box 538

South Hill, VA 23970

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing Report of Deposit of Unclaimed Funds/Small 

Dividends was electronically served or mailed to the Office of the United States Trustee at Office of the 

U.S. Trustee, 701 East Broad Street – Suite 4304, Richmond, VA 23219-1885 on April 6, 2021.

/s/Bruce E. Robinson

Trustee

Case 17-31557-KRH Doc 64 Filed 04/06/21 Entered 04/06/21 18:51:02 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1