alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 30 August 2005         

on the allocation of one additional day absent from port to Germany in accordance with Annex IVa to Council Regulation (EC) No 27/2005

(notified under document number C(2005) 3153)

(Only the German text is authentic)

(2005/633/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 27/2005 of 22 December 2004 fixing for 2005 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required (1), and in particular point 6(e) of Annex IVa,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

One additional day, in relation to those set out in point 6(a) of Annex IVa to Regulation (EC) No 27/2005, shall be allocated in each calendar month for vessels from Germany carrying on board demersal trawls, seines or similar towed gears of mesh size greater than 120 mm except beam trawls.

Article 2

A vessel to which one additional day is allocated pursuant to Article 1 may not transfer this day to any other vessel unless:

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany.

Done at Brussels, 30 August 2005.

For the Commission

Joe BORG            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 12, 14.1.2005, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1300/2005 (OJ L 207, 10.8.2005, p. 1).

----
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 97208 / March 27, 2023

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20781

In the Matter of

Baxter International Inc. ,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

ENTER ORDER APPROVING OR 

DISAPPROVING PLAN OF 

DISTRIBUTION

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20782

In the Matter of

Jeffrey Schaible,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20783

In the Matter of

Scott Bohaboy,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

On February 13, 2023, pursuant to Rule 1103 of the United States Securities and Exchange 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans (the “Commission’s Rules”), 17 C.F.R.
2

§ 201.1103, the Commission published a Notice of Proposed Plan of Distribution and Opportunity to 

Comment (“Notice”)1for the distribution of monies placed into a Fair Fund in the above-captioned 

matters. The Notice invited public comment on the proposed plan of distribution (“Plan”) through 

March 15, 2023, and the Commission received one public comment that raised various issues (the 

“Comment”). 

Rule 1104 of the Commission’s Rules, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1104, provides in relevant part, 

“[t]he order approving or disapproving the plan should be entered within 30 days after the end of 

the final period allowed for comments on the proposed plan unless the Commission or the 

hearing officer, by written order, allows a longer period for good cause shown.” 

Thirty days from the end of the final period for comments on the Plan will lapse on April 

14, 2023. The Division states additional time is needed to present its recommendation to the 

Commission regarding the Comment and the Plan, and therefore, good cause has been shown to 

enter an order extending time to approve or disapprove the Plan until October 16, 2023. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1104 of the Commission’s Rules,2

for good cause shown, the time for entering an order approving or disapproving the Plan is 

extended to October 16, 2023. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.3

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

1 Exchange Act Rel. No. 96898 (Feb. 13, 2023).

2 17 C.F.R. § 201.1104. 

3

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(i).
§ 245a.22 Rescission. ( a ) Rescission of adjustment of status under LIFE Legalization shall occur only under the procedures of 8 CFR part 246.
( b ) Information furnished by an eligible alien pursuant to any application filed under LIFE Legalization may be used by the Attorney General, and other officials and employees of the Department of Justice and any bureau or agency thereof, for purposes of rescinding, pursuant to 8 CFR part 246, any adjustment of status obtained by the alien.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Imperial Bancorp:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 2-
75352), (No. 2-61660), (No. 2-98462) and (No. 2-75353) on Forms S-8 and S-16 of
Imperial Bancorp of our report dated January 21, 1998, except as to footnote 23
which is as of February 27, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of
Imperial Bancorp and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1997, which report appears in the December 31, 1997, annual report on Form 10-K
of Imperial Bancorp.



                                      KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 26, 1998
(Case No. 00157

#### In Re Application of Madeline McGovern.

*Opinion filed November 14, 1978.*

Per Curiam.

This claim allegedly arising out of the death of a fireman killed in the line of duty, seeks payment of compensation to the decedent’s beneficiary pursuant to the provisions of the “Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act,” (hereafter, the Act), Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 48, Sec. 281, et seq.

*1056The Court has carefully considered the application for benefits submitted on the form prescribed and furnished by the Attorney General; a written statement of the decedent’s supervising officer; and a report by the Illinois Attorney General’s office which substantiates matters set forth in the application. Based upon these documents and other evidence, the Court finds that:

1. The Claimant, Madeline McGovern, is the widow of the decedent and is the beneficiary who was designated by him as stated in the application for benefits;

2. The decedent, Daniel J. McGovern, was a firefighter, employed by the Chicago Fire Department and engaged in the active performance of his duties, within the meaning of Section 2(e) of the Act, on March 16, 1978. He was 46 years of age;

3. On said date, at approximately 3:52 p.m., firefighter McGovern was responding to a home fire alarm and on the second floor, pulling ceilings and sidewalls in the bedroom, kitchen, and hallway, when he was struck on the head by ceiling plaster. He complained of being dizzy and weak and oxygen was administered to him at the fire scene. After being transported to a hospital by ambulance, he was pronounced dead at 5:10 p.m. the same date. The medical examiner’s certificate of death recited the immediate cause of death as “coronary trombosis,” due to or as a consequence of “arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease” and “inhalation of smoke and soot;”

4. Firefighter McGovern was killed in the line of duty as defined in Section 2(e) of the Act;

5. The proof submitted in support of this claim satisfies all of the requirements of the Act and the claim is therefore compensable thereunder.

*1057It is hereby ordered, by reason of the foregoing, that the sum of $20,000.00 be paid to Madeline McGovern, as widow and designated beneficiary of the deceased Chicago fireman, Daniel J. McGovern.
### §760–10. Pennsylvania fish hatchery; authorization of appropriations

There are hereby authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of section 760–9 of this title.

(Pub. L. 86–205, §2, Aug. 25, 1959, 73 Stat. 430.)
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PremierWest Bancorp (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Fowler, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                       
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period
certified.
|  

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by reference into
any of the Companys filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report or under such Acts.

|Date: November 10, 2008 | /s/ MICHAEL D. FOWLERMichael D. Fowler
    
    Chief Financial Officer and

    Principal Accounting Officer
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
§ 214.203 Period of admission. ( a ) *T-1 Principal.* T-1 nonimmigrant status may be approved for a period not to exceed 4 years, except as provided in section 214(o)(7) of the Act.
( b ) *Derivative family members.* A derivative family member who is otherwise eligible for admission may be granted T-2, T-3, T-4, T-5, or T-6 nonimmigrant status for an initial period that does not exceed the expiration date of the initial period approved for the T-1 principal applicant, except as provided in section 214(o)(7) of the Act.
( c ) *Notice.* At the time an applicant is approved for T nonimmigrant status or receives an extension of T nonimmigrant status, USCIS will notify the applicant when their T nonimmigrant status will expire. USCIS also will notify the applicant that the failure to apply for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident during the period of T nonimmigrant status, as set forth in 8 CFR 245.23, will result in termination of the applicant's T nonimmigrant status in the United States at the end of the 4-year period or any extension.
================================================================================


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Amexdrug Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jack Amin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


/s/ Jack Amin
--------------------------
Jack Amin
Chief Executive Officer

April 9, 2009


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED June 30,
2000.


<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Sep-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               Jun-30-2000
<CASH>                                            3975
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3975
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3975
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3416
<OTHER-SE>                                         559
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3975
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      749
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (749)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (749)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.000)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.000)



</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-50190 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. FRASIEL HUGHEY Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:95-CR-229
Before WIENER, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Defendant-Appellant Frasiel Hughey appeals the 36-month sentence imposed by the district court following the revocation of his supervised release. Hughey was convicted in 1996 of two counts of fraud in connection with access devices in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2), multiple counts of possessing counterfeit securities in violation of18 U.S.C. § 513, and onecount ofbank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. Hughey had been serving a five-year term of United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 2, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 08-50190

2 supervised release for the bank fraud violation, which was a Class B felony, when he violated the terms of his supervised release. Hughey does not disagree with the district court’s determination that the statutory maximum sentence on revocation is 36 months or that the district court had the authority to impose the statutory maximum sentence. Rather, he contends that the 36-month sentence is greater than necessary to achieve the sentencing goals set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553 and is therefore unreasonable. A district court may impose any sentence that falls within the maximum term of imprisonment allowed by statute. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2). In doing so, the district court is to consider the factors set forth in § 3553(a) and the advisory policy statements found in Chapter Seven of the Guidelines. U nited States v. McKinney, 520 F.3d 425, 427-28 (5th Cir. 2008). The record reflects that the district court considered the Chapter Seven policy statements and the § 3553(a) factors. The district court specifically noted Hughey’s recidivism and the need to protect society from future crimes. Thus, the record reflects that Hughey’s sentence is supported by the factors set forth in § 3553(a), particularly the need for the sentence to promote respect for the law, toafford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct, and to protect the public from future crimes. The district court committed no error, plain or otherwise, and Hughey’s sentence is neither unreasonable nor plainly unreasonable. See McKinney, 520 F.3d at 428. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
# Official Journal C 176/29 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 176 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6529 April 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 176

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6529 April 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 176/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 March 2022 to 31 March 2022(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |
| 2022/C 176/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 March 2022 to 31 March 2022(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC) | 8 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 176/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 March 2022 to 31 March 2022(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

2022/C 176/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 March 2022 to 31 March 2022(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

8

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal C 137/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.137.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 137 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 546 May 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.137.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 137

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 546 May 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 137/01 | Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 137/01

Explanatory notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 236.21 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart applies to requests for deferred action under the enforcement discretion policy set forth in this subpart, which will be described as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). This subpart does not apply to or govern any other request for or grant of deferred action or any other DHS deferred action policy.
( b ) Except as specifically provided in this subpart, the provisions of 8 CFR part 103 do not apply to requests filed under this subpart.
( c ) ( 1 ) Deferred action is an exercise of the Secretary's broad authority to establish national immigration enforcement policies and priorities under 6 U.S.C. 202(5) and section 103 of the Act. It is a form of enforcement discretion not to pursue the removal of certain aliens for a limited period in the interest of ordering enforcement priorities in light of limitations on available resources, taking into account humanitarian considerations and administrative convenience. It furthers the administrability of the complex immigration system by permitting the Secretary to focus enforcement on higher priority targets. This temporary forbearance from removal does not confer any right or entitlement to remain in or reenter the United States. A grant of deferred action under this section does not preclude DHS from commencing removal proceedings at any time or prohibit DHS or any other Federal agency from initiating any criminal or other enforcement action at any time.
( 2 ) During this period of forbearance, on the basis of this subpart only, USCIS may grant employment authorization pursuant to 8 CFR 274a.13 and 274a.12(c)(33) to DACA recipients who have demonstrated an economic need.
( 3 ) During this period of forbearance, on the basis of this subpart only, a DACA recipient is considered “lawfully present” under the provisions of 8 CFR 1.3(a)(4)(vi).
( 4 ) During this period of forbearance, on the basis of this subpart only, a DACA recipient is not considered “unlawfully present” for the purpose of inadmissibility under section 212(a)(9) of the Act.
( d ) This subpart rescinds and replaces the DACA guidance set forth in the Memorandum issued by the Secretary of Homeland Security on June 15, 2012. All current grants of deferred action and any ancillary features previously issued pursuant to the Memorandum remain in effect and will expire according to their existing terms. All such current grants of deferred action and any ancillary features, as well as any requests for renewals of those grants and new requests, are hereafter governed by this subpart and not the Memorandum.
EXHIBIT 23(a)

     INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) Registration Statements
     No.  2-96961  and No.  33-28095  on  Form  S-8 and  related  Prospectus  of
     Heilig-Meyers  Company  relating to Common Stock issued and issuable  under
     the 1983 Stock Option Plan of the Company, (ii) Registration Statements No.
     33-35263,   No.   33-50086  and  No.  33-64616  on  Form  S-8  and  related
     Prospectuses of  Heilig-Meyers  Company relating to Common Stock issued and
     issuable   under  the  1990  Stock  Option  Plan  of  the  Company,   (iii)
     Registration Statements No. 33-43791 and No. 333-82101 on Form S-8 relating
     to the  Heilig-Meyers  Company  Employee  Stock  Purchase  Plan and related
     Prospectus of the Company,  (iv)  Registration  Statements No. 33-54261 and
     No. 333-29105 on Form S-8 and related Prospectuses of Heilig-Meyers Company
     relating to Common Stock  issued and  issuable  under the 1994 Stock Option
     Plan of the Company,  (v) Registration  Statement No. 333-81743 on Form S-8
     relating  to Common  Stock  issued  and  issuable  under the  Heilig-Meyers
     Company Director Stock Ownership Plan, and (vi) Registration Statements No.
     333-07753  and No.  333-29929 on Form S-3 and the related  Prospectuses  of
     Heilig-Meyers  Company,  of our report dated March 22, 2000 (April 20, 2000
     as to the  sale of the  Berrios  division  described  in Note  18),  on the
     consolidated financial statements and schedule of Heilig-Meyers Company and
     subsidiaries,  as listed under Items 14(a) (1) and (2),  both  appearing in
     the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Heilig-Meyers  Company for the year ended
     February 29, 2000.


     /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

     Richmond, Virginia
     May 30, 2000


                                       76
<PAGE>