alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 204.308 Where to file Form I-800A or Form I-800. ( a ) *Form I-800A.* An applicant must file a Form I-800A with the USCIS office identified in the instructions that accompany Form I-800A.
( b ) *Form I-800.* After a Form I-800A has been approved, a petitioner may file a Form I-800 on behalf of a Convention adoptee with the stateside or overseas USCIS office identified in the instructions that accompany Form I-800. The petitioner may also file the Form I-800 with a visa-issuing post that would have jurisdiction to adjudicate a visa application filed by or on behalf of the Convention adoptee, when filing with the visa-issuing post is permitted by the instructions that accompany Form I-800.
( c ) *Final approval of Form I-800.* Once a Form I-800 has been provisionally approved under 8 CFR 204.313(g) and the petitioner has either adopted or obtained custody of the child for purposes of emigration and adoption, the Department of State officer with jurisdiction to adjudicate the child's application for an immigrant or nonimmigrant visa has jurisdiction to grant final approval of the Form I-800. The Department of State officer may approve the Form I-800, but may not deny it; the Department of State officer must refer any Form I-800 that is “not clearly approvable” for a decision by a USCIS office having jurisdiction over Form I-800 cases. If the Department of State officer refers the Form I-800 to USCIS because it is “not clearly approvable,” then USCIS has jurisdiction to approve or deny the Form I-800. In the case of an alien child who is in the United States and who is eligible both under 8 CFR 204.309(b)(4) for approval of a Form I-800 and under 8 CFR part 245 for adjustment of status, the USCIS office with jurisdiction to adjudicate the child's adjustment of status application also has jurisdiction to grant final approval of the Form I-800.
( d ) *Use of electronic filing.* When, and if, USCIS adopts electronic, internet-based or other digital means for filing Convention cases, the terms “filing a Form I-800A” and “filing a Form I-800” will include an additional option. Rather than filing the Form I-800A or Form I-800 and accompanying evidence in a paper format, the submission of the same required information and accompanying evidence may be filed according to the digital filing protocol that USCIS adopts.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 10,462

 10,849

 11,019

 11,801

 10,333

 9,782

 9,881

 10,957

 12,232

 13,093

 13,334

 13,612

 15,087

 15,869

 15,812

 14,591

 13,287

 11,543

 11,245

 11,456

 12,837

 13,379

 13,197

 13,596

 14,208

 14,632

 14,992

 15,126

 16,940

 14,761

 2,469

 2,254

 2,387

 2,476

 2,709

 2,818

 3,286

 3,156

 4,480

 4,283

 3,868

 4,127

 3,821

 4,434

 3,844

 4,379

 3,921

 4,415

 3,930

 4,182

 4,992

 5,047

 4,934

 4,760

 4,614

 4,559

 4,461

 4,166

 4,031

 5,534

 6,176

 6,221

 6,279

 6,890

 6,743

 6,570

 6,431

 7,023

 7,980

 8,437

 8,296

 7,961

 8,912

 9,434

 9,190

 9,039

 8,216

 7,584

 7,343

 7,483

 8,547

 8,689

 8,702

 8,559

 8,778

 8,888

 8,740

 8,833

 10,513

 9,630

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 11, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
!"##

$% 

            




	


	 ! "#



$
	%$&	


	&

	


 &


&#
'	(	)'*"'
+#,
-



.
/#'	0
1"#*2#3	$%4*2,#-


		


,
5$1 .6/	7'(8'#%"	


#9)##%
##%	/3		7)(8

:			$%;#"'
#'	2#3	##3:			

$%	
	23	

	)#'#	###!

	


,
'<;#
'	
#9)#

5$1=> 6/

"%'	
##	78	3	
##3)
"..

.
?@
##
#'	)	
3%##
'		)


#	'#3	
	'	#%##@
#	'#3	


	2'2"3		)

#	

#	





	$%	A"
##	




	/


 


9)#/


 .'
(#)

3<</


 =


3
<</


 B	

=,<</


 


#	,
	=<,/


 

C*03/D-0>??>

EF-E<*F(<*-E*F

.>%$->

"D3
..
.

	 />= B?

(
/>= B?


*
1%3G		
:

	





)
1-<	/##	


:H)3<<,

 ?)
#.	(

:I1:I1
..

	/.
...=B

(
/.
...=B


*
	G:

	





Case 18-10651-BFK Doc 529 Filed 03/14/19 Entered 03/14/19 17:20:35 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3

23
	2@
#
'##%

#'#33#
%"

	&#-
0
1"#'	*
$'D3
32
#


+F$*F*$	
	)3
#@
#'	

+F$*F*$	
	##3:			$%	
	23	



'	,


"%'	
###'#	
%2##	3	
#

#3)
"...
?@
#'	

+F$*F*$	
	2'	2
#'			
%

:	A#	$%43	;'	2	'@
#'	

+F$*F*$	
	
##'	+#	
%#
"''


#'
%"

2
#
D3


$
#             

&*$-*-0CF&,I!&$*



.

Mar 13 2019 /s/ Brian F. Kenney

Entered on Docket:Mar 13 2019

Case 18-10651-BFK Doc 529 Filed 03/14/19 Entered 03/14/19 17:20:35 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
9*-C(+FE-

  
 !    

C*03/D-0>??>

EF-E<*F(<*-E*F

.>%$->

"D3
..
.

	 />= B?

(
 />= B?


*
 1%3G		
:

  "#$ %

    

)
1-<	/##	


:H)3<<,

 ?)
#.	(

:I1:I1
..

	 /.
...=B

(
 /.
...=B


*
 	G:

	





&*
+,-!!. "#(/*(

'"	
	'33+#:
##%"

"

<


F?..
/

  
 !

C*03


??
B=..>


=

Case 18-10651-BFK Doc 529 Filed 03/14/19 Entered 03/14/19 17:20:35 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
Editorial Note on Part 1240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1240 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10355, Mar. 3, 2003.

§ 1240.12 Decision of the immigration judge. ( a ) *Contents.* The decision of the immigration judge may be oral or written. The decision of the immigration judge shall include a finding as to inadmissibility or deportability. The formal enumeration of findings is not required. The decision shall also contain reasons for granting or denying the request. The decision shall be concluded with the order of the immigration judge.
( b ) *Summary decision.* Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, in any case where inadmissibility or deportability is determined on the pleadings pursuant to § 1240.10(b) and the respondent does not make an application under § 1240.11, the alien is statutorily ineligible for relief, or the respondent applies for voluntary departure only and the immigration judge grants the application, the immigration judge may enter a summary decision or, if voluntary departure is granted, a summary decision with an alternate order of removal.
( c ) *Order of the immigration judge.* The order of the immigration judge shall direct the respondent's removal from the United States, or the termination of the proceedings, or other such disposition of the case as may be appropriate. The immigration judge is authorized to issue orders in the alternative or in combination as he or she may deem necessary.
( d ) *Removal.* When a respondent is ordered removed from the United States, the immigration judge shall identify a country, or countries in the alternative, to which the alien's removal may in the first instance be made, pursuant to the provisions of section 241(b) of the Act. In the event that the Department of Homeland Security is unable to remove the alien to the specified or alternative country or countries, the order of the immigration judge does not limit the authority of the Department of Homeland Security to remove the alien to any other country as permitted by section 241(b) of the Act.
[62 FR 10367, Mar. 6, 1997. Redesignated in part and duplicated in part from part 240 at 68 FR 9838, 9840, Feb. 28, 2003; 70 FR 674, Jan. 5, 2005]
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Administrative Proceedings Rulings

Release No. 6858 / July 22, 2022

Administrative Proceeding

File No. 3-20898

In the Matter of

Petroteq Energy, Inc., and

Aleksandr Blyumkin

Order Following

Prehearing Conference

Today I held a prehearing conference to discuss the issues raised in the 

parties’ joint prehearing report. The parties agreed to a tentative hearing date 

of March 7, 2023. The parties will confer and submit a proposed procedural 

schedule leading up to this hearing date by July 29, 2022. I will then issue a 

scheduling order and hearing guidelines.

 

/s/ James E. Grimes 

Chief Administrative Law Judge
# Official Journal L 205I/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 205I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6114 August 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 205I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6114 August 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1138 of 13 August 2018 amending for the 289th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1138 of 13 August 2018 amending for the 289th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### § 274a.4 Good faith defense.

An employer or a recruiter or referrer for a fee for employment who shows good faith compliance with the employment verification requirements of § 274a.2(b) of this part shall have established a rebuttable affirmative defense that the person or entity has not violated section 274A(a)(1)(A) of the Act with respect to such hiring, recruiting, or referral.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 94753 / April 19, 2022

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20781

In the Matter of

Baxter International Inc.,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

EXTENSION ORDER

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested an extension of time until 

January 31, 2023 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution under Rule 1101(a) of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(a). 

On February 22, 2022, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist 

Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 and 21C of the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order (the “Order”) 

against Baxter International Inc. (“Baxter”).1 In the Order, the Commission found that beginning 

in at least 2009 and continuing through July 2019, Baxter improperly leveraged its foreign 

exchange rate convention by engaging in intra-company transactions for the purpose of 

generating foreign exchange accounting gains or avoiding foreign exchange accounting losses 

(the “FX Transactions”). These FX Transactions had the effect of materially misstating Baxter’s 

net income as reported in public filings. In October 2019, Baxter announced that it was 

 

1

 Securities Act Rel. No. 11032 (Feb. 22, 2022).
2

conducting an internal investigation concerning the FX Transactions. In March 2020, Baxter 

restated its financial statements, which reduced its previously reported net income for 2017 

through June 30, 2019, and retained earnings as of January 1, 2017, by $582 million, 

collectively. The Commission ordered Baxter to pay a civil money penalty of $18 million and 

created a Fair Fund pursuant to Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Baxter has 

paid in full.

In its request for an extension of time, the Division states that additional time is needed 

to, among other things, solicit and appoint a fund administrator, develop the distribution 

methodology, and prepare the proposed plan of distribution.

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s 

request for an extension of time until January 31, 2023 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution 

is granted. 

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.2

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

2

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(i).
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      Exhibit 23



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT





HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED:

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Houston Industries
Incorporated's (i) Registration Statement on Form S-4 No. 333-11329, (ii)
Registration Statements on Form S-3 Nos. 33-39921, 33-60756, 33-51431, 33-52207
and 33-55445 and (iii) Registration Statements on Form S-8 Nos. 33-37493,
33-50629, 33-52279, 33-55391, 33-56855 and 333-04411 of our report dated
February 21, 1997, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Houston
Industries Incorporated for the year ended December 31, 1996.




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

HOUSTON, TEXAS
MARCH 20, 1997
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 15, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-11180

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANDRECO LOTT,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(4:01-CR-177-6)

--------------------

Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

A jury convicted Andreco Lott, federal prisoner # 27068-177,

of conspiracy to commit bank robbery, two counts of bank robbery,

two counts of conspiracy to obstruct interstate commerce by

robbery, and four counts of using and carrying a firearm during a

crime of violence. See United States v. Lott, 66 F. App’x 523 (5th

Cir. 2003). The district court sentenced Lott to a total aggregate

term of imprisonment of 1,111 months, to be followed by concurrent

terms of three and five years of supervised release. The district

court ordered Lott to pay restitution in the amount of $87,359.85,
2

jointly and severally with his codefendants, with payment to begin

immediately. The district court also ordered Lott to pay special

assessments of $900 immediately. 

More than one year after his conviction and sentence became

final, Lott filed a “Motion to Modify Assessments Court Cost and

Restitution Order and Set Installment Payments” and a petition to

establish quarterly installments. The purpose of the motions was

for the district court to establish a payment plan for the special

assessments and restitution. Lott alleged that the Bureau of

Prisons (BOP) was requiring him to pay more per month than he could

afford. Lott appeals the district court’s denial of these motions.

Lott’s motions challenged the manner in which the BOP was

administering the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program. His

motions did not explicitly attack any action by the sentencing

court. Lott’s motions are in the nature of 28 U.S.C. § 2241

petitions and should have been filed in the district of his

incarceration. See Pack v. Yusuff, 218 F.3d 448, 451 (5th Cir.

2000).

Accordingly, the district court’s order is VACATED and this

case is REMANDED with instructions for the district court to enter

an order dismissing Lott’s petitions for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction.

VACATED and REMANDED.
ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE IN PETS AND PEOPLE

We rely on 

antibiotics to 

fight some 

infections in 

people and pets. 

But anytime 

antibiotics are used, 

they can contribute 

to the development 

of antibiotic 

resistance.

Appropriate antibiotic use in people and pets 

helps protect the whole family––including furry,

feathered, and scaly family members––from

antibiotic-resistant infections.

People and pets 

can sometimes get 

sick with 

antibiotic-resistant 

infections, which 

are harder to treat.

Make sure your pets 

only get antibiotics 

when needed, and 

follow your 

veterinarian’s 

instructions if you 

need to give your pet 

antibiotics.

CS 314413-A

Healthy Pets,

 Healthy People

https://www.cdc.gov/healthypets/pets-and

-antibiotic-resistance.html

For more information, please visit:

Accessible information: https://www.cdc.gov/healthypets/publications/pets-antibiotic-resistance.html
### §793a. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–367, title I, §103(5), Oct. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 787

Section, Pub. L. 86–626, title I, §101, July 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 430, authorized the Federal Power Commission to place four additional positions in grade 18, one in grade 17 and one in grade 16 of the General Schedule of the Classification Act of 1949.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

# AGENCY:

National Archives and Records Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) announces a meeting of the Advisory Committee on the Electronic Records Archives (ACERA). The committee serves as a deliberative body to advise the Archivist of the United States on technical, mission, and service related to the Electronic Records Archives (ERA). This includes, but is not limited to, advising and making recommendations to the Archivist on issues related to the development, implementation and use of the ERA system. This meeting will be open to the public. However, due to space limitations and access procedures, the name and telephone number of individuals planning to attend must be submitted to the Electronic Records Archives Program at                         *era.program@nara.gov*. This meeting will be recorded for transcription purposes.                    

# DATES:

This meeting will be held on April 6, 2011, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and April 7, 2011, from 9 a.m.—12 noon.

# ADDRESSES:

700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20408-0001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Charles Piercy, Acting Assistant Archivist for the Office of Information Services, National Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, Maryland 20740 (301) 837—1583.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Agenda

(1) Opening Remarks

(2) ERA Status Updates

(3) Subcommittee Breakouts

(4) Adjournment

Dated: March 17, 2011.

Mary Ann Hadyka,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2011-6700 Filed 3-18-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
### §1320. Ownership and transfer

(a) Property Right in Design.—The property right in a design subject to protection under this chapter shall vest in the designer, the legal representatives of a deceased designer or of one under legal incapacity, the employer for whom the designer created the design in the case of a design made within the regular scope of the designer's employment, or a person to whom the rights of the designer or of such employer have been transferred. The person in whom the property right is vested shall be considered the owner of the design.

(b) Transfer of Property Right.—The property right in a registered design, or a design for which an application for registration has been or may be filed, may be assigned, granted, conveyed, or mortgaged by an instrument in writing, signed by the owner, or may be bequeathed by will.

(c) Oath or Acknowledgment of Transfer.—An oath or acknowledgment under section 1312 shall be prima facie evidence of the execution of an assignment, grant, conveyance, or mortgage under subsection (b).

(d) Recordation of Transfer.—An assignment, grant, conveyance, or mortgage under subsection (b) shall be void as against any subsequent purchaser or mortgagee for a valuable consideration, unless it is recorded in the Office of the Administrator within 3 months after its date of execution or before the date of such subsequent purchase or mortgage.

(Added Pub. L. 105–304, title V, §502, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2913; amended Pub. L. 106–44, §1(f)(2), Aug. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 222.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1999—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 106–44 substituted "Acknowledgment" for "Acknowledgement" in heading.
#### § 300.18 [Reserved]
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Ex12g
                               Idaho Power Company
                       Consolidated Financial Information
Supplemental Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends Requirements



                                            Twelve Months Ended December 31,
                                                 (Thousands of Dollars)
                                         1995         1996         1997         1998       1999
<S>                                  <C>        <C>           <C>           <C>         <C>
Earnings, as defined:
  Income before  income taxes        $ 135,333   $  142,710   $  138,746    $ 140,984   $ 143,078
  Adjust for distributed income of
  equity investees                      (2,058)      (1,413)      (3,943)      (4,697)       (837)
  Equity in loss of equity method
  investments                                0            0            0          476           0
  Minority interest in losses of
  majority owned subsidiaries                0            0            0         (125)          0
  Supplemental fixed charges and
  preferred dividends, as below         59,992       60,939       64,317       63,967      65,526

     Total earnings, as defined      $ 193,267   $  202,236   $  199,120    $ 200,605   $ 207,767

Fixed charges, as defined:
  Interest charges                   $  56,456   $   57,348   $   60,761    $  60,593   $  62,014
  Rental interest factor                   925          991          982          801         955
     Total fixed charges                57,381       58,339       61,743       61,394      62,969
  Supplemental increment to fixed
  charges*                               2,611        2,600        2,574        2,573       2,557


  Supplemental fixed charges            59,992       60,939       64,317       63,967      65,526
  Preferred stock dividends-gross
  up Idaho Power rate                   12,392       12,146        7,803        8,275       8,133

     Total combined supplemental
     fixed charges and preferred
     dividends                       $  72,384   $   73,085   $   72,120    $  72,242   $  73,659

Supplemental ratio of earnings to
combined fixed charges and
preferred dividends                      2.67x        2.77x        2.76x        2.78x       2.82x

*Explanation of increment - Interest on the guaranty of American Falls
      Reservoir District bonds and Milner Dam, Inc. notes which are
      already included in operation expenses.



</TABLE>