alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.01

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Ocean  Power
Corporation  (the  "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),
Michael Hopper, as Authorized Signatory of the Company,  certifies,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2) The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ MICHAEL HOPPER
----------------------------
Name:  Michael Hopper
Title: Authorized Signatory
Date:  January 31, 2008


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
----

NOTICE TO READER

----
#### § 222.122 What procedures are followed if it is determined that the local educational agency's funds will not be withheld under this subpart?

If the Secretary determines that an LEA's payments will not be withheld under this subpart, the Assistant Secretary notifies the LEA and the affected Indian tribe or tribes, in writing, by certified mail with return receipt requested, of the reasons why the payments will not be withheld.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7704 (d)-(e))
(No. 81-CC-2813

#### In re Application of Florence J. Ward, Administratrix of the Estate of James Ward, Deceased.

*Opinion filed August 19, 1981.*

Panter, Nelson & Bernfield, Ltd., for Claimant.

Tyrone C. Fahner, Attorney General (Francis M. Donovan, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

Roe, C. J.

This cause comes on to be heard on the motion of *399Respondent to dismiss and the reply thereto filed by the Applicant, due notice having been given, and the Court being fully advised.

This is a claim for benefits under the provisions of Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act hereinafter referred to as the Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 48, par 281 *et*seq.) Florence J. Ward, wife of James Ward, a fireman employed by the Chicago Fire Department, made the application as administratrix of his estate.

James Ward died on February 23, 1971. The application was filed on March 3, 1972. Over nine years later, the State moved to dismiss this claim based on the running of the applicable statute of limitations. In support of its motion, the State points out that sections 3 and 4 of the Act provide in pertinent part as follows:

> “If a claim therefor is made within one year of the date of death of the . . . fireman. ...”

> 0 0 0

> “Notwithstanding Section 3, no compensation is payable under this Act unless a claim therefor is filed, within the time specified by that Section.. .

Because the time between the date of James Ward’s death and the date the application filed was in excess of one year, we find that the statute of limitations had run and are bound by law to grant the State’s motion to dismiss this claim. Regardless of the vagueness of much of the rest of the Act which the Court has had to interpret over the years, the one-year limitation is clear and unequivocal.

In her reply to the State’s motion, the Applicant asserts that the State’s motion should be barred by the doctrine of *laches.*Indeed this position would probably be well taken in courts of the judicial branch with general jurisdiction inasmuch as no action was taken on *400her claim for six and one half years, pretrial hearings were held in 1979 and 1980, Applicant was allowed to retain counsel on her behalf and required to submit additional documents in support of the claim, etc. However, the doctrine of *laches*is an equitable defense and this Court has steadfastly recognized that it does not have equitable jurisdiction.

Accordingly, we reluctantly dismiss this claim.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 99868 / April 1, 2024

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-21626

In the Matter of

EMPOWER CLINICS, INC.

ORDER REGARDING STATUS REPORT

On September 7, 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued an order

instituting proceedings (“OIP”) against Empower Clinics, Inc. (“Respondent”) pursuant to

Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.1 On November 17, 2023, Respondent filed

its answer. On December 5, 2023, the parties submitted a joint statement regarding the

prehearing conference, which represented that “[i]f this matter does not settle, the Division

anticipates filing a motion for summary disposition.” To date, no settlement order has been

issued and no motion for summary disposition has been filed.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the parties file a status report concerning settlement

efforts, or a briefing schedule for a motion for summary disposition in the event it does not

appear a settlement agreement will be reached, by May 1, 2024, and every 28 days thereafter.

1 Empower Clinics, Inc., Exchange Act Release No. 98315, 2023 WL 5830476 (Sept. 7, 

2023).
2

The parties’ attention is directed to the e-filing requirements in the Rules of Practice.

2

 

We also remind the parties that any document filed with the Commission must be served upon all 

participants in the proceeding and be accompanied by a certificate of service.3

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary

2

See Rules of Practice 151, 152(a), 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.151, .152(a) (providing procedure for 

filing papers with the Commission and mandating electronic filing in the form and manner 

posted on the Commission’s website); Instructions for Electronic Filing and Service of 

Documents in SEC Administrative Proceedings and Technical Specifications, 

https://www.sec.gov/efapdocs/instructions.pdf. Parties generally also must certify that they have 

redacted or omitted sensitive personal information from any filing. Rule of Practice 151(e), 

17 C.F.R. § 201.151(e).

3

See Rule of Practice 150, 17 C.F.R. § 201.150 (generally requiring parties to serve each 

other with their filings); Rule of Practice 151(d), 17 C.F.R. § 201.151(d) (“Papers filed with the 

Commission . . . shall be accompanied by a certificate stating the name of the person or persons 

served, the date of service, the method of service, and the mailing address or email address to 

which service was made, if not made in person.”).
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 82452 / January 5, 2018

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension, pursuant to 

Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), of trading in the 

securities of UBI Blockchain Internet, Ltd. (“UBIA”), of Hong Kong, People’s Republic of 

China at 9:30 a.m. EST on January 8, 2018, and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EST, on January 22, 

2018.

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of UBIA because of (i) 

questions regarding the accuracy of assertions, since at least September 2017, by UBIA in filings 

with the Commission regarding the company’s business operations; and (ii) concerns about 

recent, unusual and unexplained market activity in the company’s Class A common stock since 

at least November 2017. This order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).

The Commission cautions broker-dealers, shareholders, and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by the company. 

Further, brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Rule 15c2-11 under the 

Exchange Act, at the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered unless 

and until they have strictly complied with all of the provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer 

has any questions as to whether or not it has complied with the rule, it should not enter any 

quotation but immediately contact the staff in the Division of Trading and Markets, Office of 

Interpretation and Guidance, at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is 

required by Rule 15c2-11, it should refrain from entering quotations relating to UBIA’s

securities until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is certain that all of its 

provisions have been met. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of 

the rule, the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action.

If any broker-dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, they

should contact John P. Lucas of the Division of Enforcement’s Cyber Unit at (202) 551-5798. 

The Commission appreciates the assistance of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Q Comm International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Paul Hickey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

/s/ Paul Hickey
-----------------------
Paul Hickey
Chief Executive Officer

November 7, 2003
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. Section 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Q Comm International, Inc. (the
        "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on the date hereof (the
        "Report"), I, Mark W. Robinson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will
        be
        retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
        request.
 
 /s/
        Mark W.
        Robinson
 
 Mark
        W.
        Robinson
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 (Principal
        Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
 November
        14, 2005
Exhibit 32.1

BIODELIVERY SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark A. Sirgo, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark A. Sirgo                                                   
|Mark A. Sirgo President and
Chief Executive Officer November 9, 2010
Exhibit 3(i).3


                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

                                     TO THE

                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                              OF MOUNTAIN OIL, INC.

         Pursuant to the provisions of the Utah Revised Business Corporation
Act, Utah Code Ann. ss.16-10a-101, et seq. (the "Act"), the individual named
below causes these Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of
Mountain Oil, Inc., a Utah corporation to be delivered to the Utah Division of
Corporations for filing and states as follows:

         1. The name of the corporation is Mountain Oil, Inc. (the
"Corporation").

         2. Article I of the Corporation's articles of incorporation is hereby
amended to read in its entirety as follows:

                                    ARTICLE I
                                      NAME

         The name of the corporation is Dental Patient Care America, Inc.

         3. The amendment was adopted by the shareholders of the Corporation.
The number of votes cast for the amendment by each voting group entitled to vote
separately on the amendment was sufficient for approval by that voting group.


Adoption DATED: July 13, 2004.                  MOUNTAIN OIL, INC.


                                                By: /s/ Marlon Berrett
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Marlon Berrett, President
§ 222.158 What procedures apply to the Secretary's review of an initial decision? When the Secretary reviews an initial decision, the Secretary— ( a ) Notifies the applicant in writing that it may file a written statement or comments; and
( b ) Mails to each party written notice of the Secretary's final decision.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7711(a))
[60 FR 50778, Sept. 29, 1995, as amended at 62 FR 35419, July 1, 1997]
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant




                                      128
<PAGE>   2
EXHIBIT 21

                           HUDSON GENERAL CORPORATION
                                  SUBSIDIARIES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Jurisdiction
                                                                         of
                                                                    Incorporation
                                                                    -------------
<S>                                                                 <C>
Hudson General Aviation Services Inc.                                      Canada

Hudson Aviation Services, Inc. California                              California

   Hudson General Coach Lines, Inc.                                    California

Hudson Aviation Services, Inc. Delaware                                  Delaware

Hudson Aviation Services, Inc.                                      Massachusetts

Hudson Aviation Services-Oakland, Inc.                                 California

Hudson Kohala Inc.                                                       Delaware

Hudson General LLC                                                       Delaware

   Hudson General Leasing Corporation                                    Delaware
</TABLE>




                                      129
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1089/2005

of 11 July 2005         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 12 July 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 July 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 11 July 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----
§ 668.213 Application procedures. ( a ) Based on the detailed site inspections and damage estimates prepared pursuant to paragraph (e) of § 668.211, the applicant will submit an application in the form of a letter to the DFDE which shall include a list of projects for which emergency relief is requested. The application shall be submitted within 3 months after an Affirmative Finding.
( b ) The list of projects shall include emergency repairs, PE, and permanent work, and provide for each project a location, length, project number, type of damage, description of work with a separate breakdown for betterments including a justification for those intended for emergency relief funding, proposed method of construction, estimated cost, and any other information requested by the DFDE.
( c ) If the initial list of projects is incomplete, a subsequent list(s) of projects shall be forwarded to the DFDE for approval consideration as soon as possible.
[43 FR 59485, Dec. 21, 1978, as amended at 47 FR 10529, Mar. 11, 1982]
No. 20,668.

#### Latimer Construction Company, d/b/a Centennial Concrete Company *v.*Edwin L. Cram.

(383 P. [2d] 315)

Decided July 8, 1963.

Rehearing denied July 22, 1963.

Messrs. Gorsuch, Kirgis, Campbell, Walker and Grover, Mr. Dwight D. Murphey, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant in error.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Day

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Plaintiff in error sought to have the defendant in error cited by the trial court for civil contempt because *534of his failure to respond to process issued in ancillary-proceedings in aid of execution on default judgment. When the defendant in error failed to appear and show cause why he should not be adjudged in contempt a bench warrant was issued for his arrest, and he was brought into court on the warrant. At the close of the hearing the following minute order appears in the record filed in this court on writ of error:

“Now on this day in open court comes said plaintiff by Dwight D. Murphey, Esq., and said defendant appeared on Bench Warrant and testimony was taken.

“And thereupon, it is the Order of the Court that all Bench Warrants be stricken and said defendant, Edwin L. Cram, be released from custody.”

The foregoing does not constitute a final judgment and no other entry appears of record in connection with the court’s disposition of the matters sought to be reviewed. This being the state of the record, there is no final judgment to which writ of error will lie.

The writ of error is dismissed.

Mr. Justice McWilliams not participating.
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Norfolk Division

In re: MATTHEW ALLEN COX

Debtor

Chapter 13

Case No.: 17-70465-SCS

REPORT OF DEPOSIT OF UNCLAIMED FUNDS

(Debtor(s) or Creditor(s) name and address) (Amount of dividend)

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3011 and 11 U.S.C. 347 the Trustee herein submits a check payable 

to "Clerk, United States Bankruptcy Court" representing unclaimed funds to be deposited by the Clerk of Court into the 

Treasury of the United States. Said funds are subject to withdrawal as provided by 28 U.S.C. 2042 and shall not escheat 

under any state law. The unclaimed funds represent the dividend(s) due and payable to:

MATTHEW ALLEN COX

4385 DESERT ROAD

SUFFOLK, VA 23434

$1,577.60 

Michael P. Cotter

Chapter 13 Standing Trustee

870 Greenbrier Circle, Suite 402

Chesapeake, VA 23320

(757) 961-3000

Date: November 30, 2018 /s/ Michael P. Cotter

Case 17-70465-SCS Doc 31 Filed 12/03/18 Entered 12/03/18 08:55:04 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
### §620j. Authority of Export Administration Act of 1979

Nothing in sections 620 to 620j of this title shall be construed to—

(1) prejudice the outcome of pending or prospective petitions filed under, or

(2) warrant the exercise of the authority contained in,

section 7 1 of the Export Administration Act of 1979 with respect to the export of unprocessed timber.

(Pub. L. 101–382, title IV, §499, Aug. 20, 1990, 104 Stat. 726.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 7 of the Export Administration Act of 1979, referred to in text, is section 7 of Pub. L. 96–72, Sept. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 515, which was classified to section 4606 of Title 50, War and National Defense, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title XVII, §1766(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2232.

1 See References in Text note below.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of EarthLink, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period endedJune 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin M. Dotts, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

(1)          the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/  KEVIN M. DOTTS |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
|                          |
| Kevin M. Dotts                |
| Chief Financial Officer       |
| August 6, 2007                |

 

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 1270

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1270 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10359, Mar. 5, 2003.

#### § 1270.1 Definitions.

For the purpose of this part—

*Document* means an instrument on which is recorded, by means of letters, figures, or marks, matters which may be used to fulfill any requirement of the Act. The term “document” includes, but is not limited to, an application required to be filed under the Act and any other accompanying document or material;

*Entity* means any legal entity, including, but not limited to, a corporation, partnership, joint venture, governmental body, agency, proprietorship, or association, including an agent or anyone acting directly or indirectly in the interest thereof.