alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 70591 / October 1, 2013

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-14854

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

 :

GMB Capital Management LLC :

(currently known as :

“Clearstream Investments LLC”), :

GMB Capital Partners LLC, :

Gabriel Bitran and :

Marco Bitran, : EXTENSION ORDER

:

Respondents. :

____________________________________:

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested an extension of time, until 

December 13, 2013, to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution under Rule 1101(a) of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans.

On April 20, 2012, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Administrative and 

Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 21C 

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Section 9(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, 

and Sections 203(e), 203(f), and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Making 

Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order (Securities Act 

Release No. 9315) (“Order”). The Order required Respondents to pay a total of $4,800,000 in 

disgorgement and civil money penalties to the Commission and created a Fair Fund pursuant 

to Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended.
 In its request for an extension of time, the Division states that it has solicited and 

reviewed proposals from fund administrators.

1 The Division requires additional time to seek 

Commission approval of the appointment of the fund administrator and approval of a bond.

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s 

request for an extension of time until December 13, 2013, to submit a Proposed Plan of 

Distribution is granted.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority. 

Elizabeth M. Murphy

Secretary

 1 On February 8, 2013, an Order was issued granting an extension of time until June 28, 2013 to submit a Plan of 

Distribution.
Registrant's Specimen Certificate for Ordinary Shares



 Exhibit 4.2 
  

							
	 	  	 


	  	 AIRMEDIA GROUP
INC.                            
 (Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman
Islands)                            

	 Name of Company:
 AirMedia Group Inc.

 
 Number:
  
	  	  
 Number
  
  
  
	  	  
 US$1,000,000 Share Capital divided into
 900,000,000 Ordinary Shares of a nominal or par value of US$0.001 each and
 100,000,000 Preferred Shares of a nominal or par value of US$0.001 each
	 	  
 Ordinary Shares

	 Ordinary Shares:
  
 Issued to:
  
 Dated
  
 Transferred from:
	  	  
 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT
                                        
xxx
                                        
is the registered holder of
                                        
                     xxx
                                        
                     Ordinary Shares in the above-named Company subject to the memorandum and articles of association thereof.
  
 EXECUTED for and on behalf of the Company on
                    2007.
  
                             DIRECTOR
                                        
                                










					
		  	        TRANSFER	  	
			
		  	I	  	(the Transferor) for the value received
			
		  	DO HEREBY transfer to	  	(the Transferee) the
			
		  		  	shares standing in my name in the
			
		  	undertaking called AIRMEDIA GROUP INC.	  	
			
		  	 To hold the same unto the Transferee
  
	  	
			
		  	Dated	  	
			
		  	Signed by the Transferor	  	
			
		  	in the presence of:	  	
			
		  	  
	  	  

		  	Witness	  	Transferor
BLEDINCOURT0- APPEALS 12th C<xn of AppeasDsnct



## IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0228-14
THE STATE OF TEXAS
TERENCE JOHNSON, Appellee ON STATE'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON COUNTY Meyers, J., filed a dissenting opinion. DISSENTING OPINION 

### I disagree that the destruction-of-a-flag statute is unconstitutionally overbroad. The statute is actually quite specific: "A person commits an offense ifthe person 

### intentionally or knowingly damages, defaces, mutilates, or burns the flag ofthe United States or the State ofTexas." TEX.PENAL CODE§42.11. It serves to keep people from 

### destroying a symbol ofour nation and state, which is exactly what Appellee did here. ByJohnson dissent-Page 2 

### all accounts, he was not attempting to make any type ofstatement, so his conduct is not 

### protected under the First Amendment. Although it is the flag's symbolism that provides it specialized protection under this statute, its use as a symbol ofexpression is exempted from prosecution and thus the limited enforcement ofthe statute will not produce a chilling effect on protected conduct. The State couldjust as easily promulgate a statute 

### prohibiting the killing ofa mockingbird, which as the State bird ofTexas also has great symbolism, without infringing on the freedom ofexpression. Because it is overkill to declare this statute unconstitutional when the real question 

### is merely whether the State had sufficient evidence to convict Appellee ofdestruction ofa flag, I respectfully dissent.

Filed: October 7, 2015 Publish
#### Nyberg Automobile Works, Defendant in Error, v. H. A. Devaux et al., Plaintiffs in Error.

Gen. No. 15,211.

1. *Trial—power of court to reopen case.*It is within the discretion of the trial court to permit a party to introduce additional evidence after he has rested his case and no abuse of discretion is shown where the court permitted an oversight to be corrected.

2. *Instructions—when province of jury not invaded.*A statement by the court to the jury of the amount calculated by a witness as due upon a note in suit is not error where the court would have been justified in primarily directing a verdict.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Stephen A. Foster, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1909.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed December 2, 1910.

Prentiss, Putney, Meek & Solberg, for plaintiffs in error; G. P. Sayers, of counsel.

Charles Daniels and Sumner C. Palmer, for defendant in error.

Mr. Presiding Justice Mack

delivered the opinion of the court.

While in this case defendants were defaulted for want of an affidavit of defense to a suit on promissory notes, nevertheless the jury were sworn to try all the issues, and the defendants had full opportunity to make any defense that they had. They participated in the jury trial. The justice of the judgment based on defendants’ notes is too clear for discussion. That the court allowed plaintiff to introduce the notes in evidence after it had rested its case and defendants had asked an instruction in their favor is no ground for reversal. There was clearly no abuse of judicial discretion in thus correcting an oversight.

If requested, the court should and would have directed a verdict for plaintiff for the amount found *96due. There was therefore no error in the court stating to the jury the amount that had been calculated by a witness and testified to by him.

*Affirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                    5
<LEGEND>
  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE 52 WEEKS ENDED AUGUST 1, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            AUG-1-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                               AUG-3-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                 AUG-1-1999
<CASH>                                                       2,741,163
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                10,678,638
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                  19,880,370
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             36,215,865
<PP&E>                                                       39,296,419
<DEPRECIATION>                                               17,407,866
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               74,056,237
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        10,513,340
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                     503,028
<OTHER-SE>                                                   42,396,580
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 74,056,237
<SALES>                                                      61,035,722
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             61,035,722
<CGS>                                                        36,748,901
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                48,626,272
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           747,846
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              11,959,703
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 4,098,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          7,861,703
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              (126,826)
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 7,734,877
<EPS-BASIC>                                                1.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                1.37


</TABLE>
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001

99–465 PDF 2016

[ERRATA] 

STRENGTHENING EDUCATION 

RESEARCH AND PRIVACY 

PROTECTIONS TO BETTER SERVE 

STUDENTS 

HEARING 

BEFORE THE

COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION 

AND THE WORKFORCE 

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS 

SECOND SESSION 

HEARING HELD IN WASHINGTON, DC, MARCH 22, 2016 

Serial No. 114–45 

Printed for the use of the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

( 

Available via the World Wide Web: www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/ 

committee.action?chamber=house&committee=education 

or 

Committee address: http://edworkforce.house.gov 

CEWDOCROOM with DISTILLER

ERRATA 

The referenced hearing held before the Committee on Education 

and the Workforce was inadvertently printed with the incorrect serial number as 114–45. The correct serial number is 114–43. 

CEWDOCROOM with DISTILLER
# Official Journal C 162/2 Ju

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 162 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 482 July 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 162

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 482 July 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 162/1 | Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 2,05 % on 1 July 2005 — Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 162/2 | Final report of the Hearing Officer in Case COMP/32.448 and 32.450 — Compagnie Maritime Belge (pursuant to Article 15 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21) (1) | 2 |
| 2005/C 162/3 | Summary information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1/2004 of 23 December 2003 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of agricultural products | 3 |
| 2005/C 162/4 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 5 |
| 2005/C 162/5 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3830 — Goldman Sachs/Treofan) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 7 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 162/1

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 2,05 % on 1 July 2005 — Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 162/2

Final report of the Hearing Officer in Case COMP/32.448 and 32.450 — Compagnie Maritime Belge (pursuant to Article 15 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21) (1)

2

2005/C 162/3

Summary information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1/2004 of 23 December 2003 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of agricultural products

3

2005/C 162/4

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

5

2005/C 162/5

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3830 — Goldman Sachs/Treofan) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
O

c

h

o

c

o

N

a

tio

n

al F

o

r

e

s

t

L

o

o

k

o

u

t

M

o

u

n

t

ain

R

a

n

g

e

r

Dis

t

ric

t

M

a

p

3

o

f

1

7

See Sheet 6

S

P

E

A

R

S

D

R

A

F

T

EIS

26

Marks Creek

Ochoco Creek

M i ll Creek

East Fork Mill Creek

Coyle Creek

Canyon Creek

Blevins Creek

Crystal Creek

Cram

Creek

Polly Creek

Salmon Creek

Rush Creek

West Fork Mill Creek

Peterson Creek

Lemon Creek

Judy Creek

Little Hay Creek

Jim Elliot Creek Douthit Creek

Sears Cre ek

Wildcat Creek

Slide C reek

Scissors Creek

O Kelly Creek

Desolation Canyon

Kyle Creek

Winter Creek

Reilly Creek

Buck Cr eek

Corner Creek

Rilly Creek

Ahalt Creek

D oe Creek

Fintcher Creek

McGin nis Cree

B

k

rogan Creek

Harvey Creek

Benefield Creek

Cline Creek

Johnson Cre ek

Fisher Creek

Hedgepath Creek

Howard Creek

Rail Creek

Hash Rock Creek

Peaslee Creek

Deadman Creek

Belknap Creek

Metal Creek

Duncan Creek

Cady Creek

Garden Creek

Willow Cree k

H eflin Creek

Scotty Creek

South Fork Howard Creek

West Fork Howard Creek

McKay Creek

Thronson Creek

Thorn Creek

Long Hollow

Creek

Camp

Creek #2

Merritt Creek

Grant Cree

P

k

otlid Creek

Nature Creek

West Branch Bridge Trib 2

Wolf Creek

Johnson C

Dun

reek

can Creek

1 6 5 4 3

8

9

7

9

4

7

5 4 3

9

8

8

5

7

7

8

6

9

7

2

9

8

8

9

1 3

7

6

5

2

6 4 3 2 6 5 4 1 3

1

1 2

4 1 6 5 3

2

11

28

36

25

11

30

16

27

33

11

27

18

33

11

29

25

23

32

13

22

12

14

17

24

15

26

20

35 31

34

28

28

30

29

32

26

10

34

21

29

34

32

34

26

19

17

33

10

25 29

33

15

29

31

33

17

35

35 31

10

34

22

15

28

19

33 36 32

28

15

27

22

32

16

21

16

21

12

30

13

32

20

16

31

10

30

18

10

30 27

20

12

31

27

28 27

15

25

18

23

14

26

34

17

24

18

18 17 16 14 16

14

36

36

15

12

35

13

10

17

29

13

31

18

30

36

19

25

12

24

36

25

12

13

13

2

11

11

22

23 24

26

35

21 21

35

23 20

14

22

23

19 24 19 19 20

14

21 22

26

24 20 23

19 20 22 23

Legend

Project Area

Township and Range

Sections

Major Roads

Non-Forest Service Lands

Riparian Habitat Conservation Area

Redband Trout Distribution 0 0.5 1 2 3

Miles

33

4/3/2007

T:\r06\och\lom\project\eis_spears_2006\gis\arcmap\map3 -Fish Distribution - RHCA.mxd

27

42

22

Information displayed on this map was derived from multiple sources.

This map is only for graphic display and general planning purposes.

Inquiries concerning information displayed on our maps, their sources,

and intended uses should be directed to:

Ochoco National Forest

3160 NE Third Street

Prineville, Oregon 97754

(541) 416-6500

This map has no warranties to its contents or accuracy.

R 17 E

T

12

S

R 18 E R 19 E R 20 E

T

13

S

T

14

S

Fis

h

Dis

t

rib

u

tio

n

-

Rip

a

ria

n

H

a

bit

a

t

C

o

n

s

e

rv

a

tio

n

A

r

e

a

s
|   | 1. | I      am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Royal Energy      Resources, Inc. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Attached      to this certification is Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended May 31, 2009, a      periodic report (the “periodic report”) filed by the issuer with the      Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), which contains      condensed financial statements. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | I      hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  that |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | The      periodic report containing the condensed financial statements fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange      Act, and |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | The      information in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations      of the issuer for the periodspresented. |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| December      7, 2009 | /s/ Jacob Roth                   |   |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------|--------|
|                  | Jacob      Roth                  |
|                  | Chief      Executive Officer and |
|                  | Chief      Financial Officer     |

----
### §835g. Relocation of Indian cemeteries

As to any Indian cemetery lands required for the project, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized, in his discretion, in lieu of requiring payment therefor, to establish cemeteries on other lands that he may select and acquire for the purpose, and to remove bodies, markers, and other appurtenances to the new sites. All costs incurred in connection with any such relocation shall be paid from moneys appropriated for the project. All right, title, and interest of the Indians in the lands within any cemetery so relocated shall terminate and the grant of title under sections 835d to 835h of this title take effect as of the date the Secretary of the Interior authorizes the relocation. Sites of the relocated cemeteries shall be held in trust by the United States for the Spokane or Colville Tribe, as the case may be, and shall be nontaxable.

(June 29, 1940, ch. 460, §4, 54 Stat. 703.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
# C_2010134EN.01004901.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/49

---

Action brought on 29 March 2010 — Space Beach Club v OHIM — Flores Gómez (SpS space of sound)

(Case T-144/10)

2010/C 134/79

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Space Beach Club SA (San Jorge (Ibiza), Spain) (represented by: A. Alejos Cutuli, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Miguel Ángel Flores Gómez (Madrid, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM and refuse registration of Community trade mark application No 5683693; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM and refuse registration of Community trade mark application No 5683693;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Miguel Ángel Flores Gómez

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing the verbal component ‘SpS space of sound’ (Application No 5 683 693) for goods and services in Classes 9, 35 and 41.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The defendant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Spanish figurative marks which contain the word element ‘SPACE’ (Nos 2 021 783, 2 610 677, 2 644 838, 2 644 839, 2 654 511, 2 694 428, 2 583 870, 3 175 742 and 4 529 814) for goods and services in Classes 9, 25 and 41.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Action dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Incorrect interpretation of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark.

Pleas in law:

---