alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
!"!! #$ % 	

















&'

 !" #$##%!&!'()	#!)	)



*+
,!-%#.)#	$/)('(%)

%

!%(#.)#0

!

%  1(% 	%2	#'(%!  	

3."."4	5 !	#6$##%! 	 '  %

		 	7)%   	(	%		)(( 	

 		%/	)(( 		8'9) %# 2) #((#)	  	

(	!%  	)

3.".")	)

*++:;:

;%
0:;:;! 	<()	%

89) 8(8#()	((1	# ( #818

* 1%     =	=  ## 	   

*$/)('&)%1

 	

&1!&

0>?#<%  /!*) 


@!A 1 
>

$)("	!B)	

# .'!?		 # 

0
0"	 *

-#

. (8%!A?
0

Oct 31 2016

Entered on Docket: Oct 31 2016

Case 16-34012-KLP Doc 23 Filed 10/31/16 Entered 10/31/16 11:31:04 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
" #$##%!&


0


@/!A?
,



Case 16-34012-KLP Doc 23 Filed 10/31/16 Entered 10/31/16 11:31:04 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
¡AHORA ESCUCHE ESTO!

Tome medidas para proteger su audición

Use los controles de ruido disponibles

• Permanezca dentro de la cabina u otros

recintos con las ventanas y puertas

cerradas.

• Remplace los controles de ruido

(p. ej., cortinas, sellos) después del

mantenimiento o de la inspección de

equipos según sea necesario.

Haga el mantenimiento de los equipos

• Asegúrese de que la lubricación de las

máquinas, la tensión de las correas y los

pernos, y el funcionamiento del motor sean

los correctos.

• Asegúrese de que la lubricación de las

máquinas, la tensión de las correas y los

pernos, y el funcionamiento del motor sean

los correctos.

Aléjese de las áreas ruidosas

• Evite circunstancias en donde el ruido

afecte la comunicación.

• Tome descansos programados y para

almorzar en áreas donde no haya

ruido.

Use protección auditiva

• Use protección auditiva

constantemente cuando trabaje en

lugares con ruido.

• Asegúrese de que la protección se use

correctamente con los otros equipos

de seguridad y que sea cómoda para

el uso prolongado.

X

X

X

X

Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention

National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health

Encuentre materiales de NIOSH y obtenga respuestas a las preguntas sobre seguridad y salud en el lugar de trabajo:

1-800-CDC-INFO (1-800-232-4636) | TTY: 1-888-232-6348

CDC/NIOSH INFO: cdc.gov/info | cdc.gov/niosh

Monthly NIOSH eNews: cdc.gov/niosh/eNews

DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2020–112

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHPUB2020112

Descargo de responsabilidad: La mención de cualquier compañía o producto no constituye respaldo alguno por parte de NIOSH.

Centros para el Control y 

la Prevención de Enfermedades 

Instituto Nacional para la Seguridad y 

Salud Ocupacional
#### § 500.106 PMS.

An effective PMS for Federal-aid highways is a systematic process that provides information for use in implementing cost-effective pavement reconstruction, rehabilitation, and preventative maintenance programs and that results in pavements designed to accommodate current and forecasted traffic in a safe, durable, and cost-effective manner. The PMS should be based on the “AASHTO Guidelines for Pavement Management Systems.”[1]

###### Footnotes -
  500.106

[1] *AASHTO Guidelines for Pavement Management Systems,* July 1990, can be purchased from the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 444 N. Capitol Street, NW., Suite 249, Washington, D.C. 20001. Available for inspection as prescribed in 49 CFR part 7, appendix D.
#### § 280.7 Approval of bonds or acceptance of cash deposit to obtain clearance.

The district director of customs is authorized to approve the bond, or accept the sum of money which is being offered for deposit under any provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act or by this chapter for the purpose of obtaining clearance of a vessel or aircraft with the exception of sections 239, 251(d), 255, 256, 272, and 273(d) in which the Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service is authorized to approve the bond or accept the sum of money which is being offered for deposit.

[22 FR 9807, Dec. 6, 1957, as amended at 32 FR 17651, Dec. 12, 1967; 56 FR 26020, June 6, 1991]
§ 110.39 Exhaustion of administrative remedies. ( a ) A complainant may file a civil action following the exhaustion of administrative remedies under the Act. Administrative remedies are exhausted if— ( 1 ) One hundred eighty days have elapsed since the complainant filed the complaint with ED, and ED has made no finding with regard to the complaint; or
( 2 ) ED issues any finding in favor of the recipient.
( b ) If ED fails to make a finding within 180 days or issues a finding in favor of the recipient, ED promptly— ( 1 ) Advises the complainant of this fact;
( 2 ) Advises the complainant of his or her right to bring a civil action for injunctive relief; and
( 3 ) Informs the complainant— ( i ) That a civil action can be brought only in a United States district court for the district in which the recipient is found or transacts business;
( ii ) That a complainant prevailing in a civil action has the right to be awarded the costs of the action, including reasonable attorney's fees, but that these costs must be demanded in the complaint filed with the court;
( iii ) That before commencing the action, the complainant shall give 30 days notice by registered mail to the Secretary, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Attorney General of the United States, and the recipient;
( iv ) That the notice shall state the alleged violation of the Act, the relief requested, the court in which the action will be brought, and whether or not attorney's fees are demanded in the event the complainant prevails; and
( v ) That the complainant may not bring an action if the same alleged violation of the Act by the same recipient is the subject of a pending action in any court of the United States.
(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6104)
#### Charles H. Weaver *et*al. *v.*William A. Poyer.

1. Injunction *bond—defense to suit on.*In a suit upon an injunction bond, given upon enjoining the collection of a judgment, it is no defense to show that, after the dissolution of the injunction in respect to which the bond was given; another injunction was obtained against the collection of the same judgment, and that the last injunction is still in force and not dissolved.

3. *Same—what recoverable in suit on.*Where damages are awarded by the court upon dissolving an injunction, and no appeal is taken therefrom, the amount of such award is recoverable in a suit upon the injunction bond.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. Eldridge & Tourtelotte, for the appellants.

Messrs. Barker & Waite, and Mr. Wit. Hopkins, for the appellee.

Mr. Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This is an appeal by Charles H. Weaver and Hiram H. Marsh, from a judgment rendered in the Superior Court of Cook county, in an action of debt upon an injunction bond, brought by William A. Poyer, the obligee therein.

It appears an injunction had been obtained by Weaver, to restrain the collection of a judgment theretofore obtained by Poyer against him, which, on demurrer to the bill, had been *490dissolved, and the bill dismissed. On obtaining the injunction, Weaver executed a bond with Marsh as his surety, which is the bond in suit.

The defense to the action was, substantially, that immediately after the dissolution of the injunction and the dismissal of the bill, he, Weaver, applied for and obtained another injunction to restrain the collection of the same judgment, with an averment that the said last named bill for an injunction is still pending and undetermined.

We do not understand it was any part of the object or scope of the last named bill for an injunction, to restrain proceedings on this .bond given in the first suit. This is a separate and independent action, having no connection with the injunction pending; and wTe are at a loss to understand how its pend-ency can affect this suit. They are separate and distinct. When the first bill was dismissed, a right of action accrued to the obligees in the bond *instcmter,*and nothing has occurred to arrest it. The bond obliged the obligors to pay the amount of the judgment enjoined, and costs, interest and damages. We do not perceive that the obligee, the appellee here, has recovered any more.

The special plea alleging the pendency of another injunction to enjoin the collection of the same judgment, was no defense to this action, and the demurrer was properly sustained thereto.

As to the seventy-five dollars damages, it is only necessary to say, they were awarded on the dissolution of the injunction and dismissal of the bill, from which no appeal was taken,'and are recoverable in this action on the injunction bond, being embraced in its terms.

The judgment is affirmed, there being no error in the record.

*Judgment affirmed.*
H. R. 4734 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 171 South 

Maple Street in Dana, Indiana, as the ‘‘Ernest ‘Ernie’ T. Pyle Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ERNEST ‘‘ERNIE’’ T. PYLE POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 171 South Maple Street in Dana, Indiana, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Ernest ‘Ernie’ T. Pyle Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Ernest ‘Ernie’ T. Pyle Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 23, 2009 

d1116 

Order 

 

November 23, 2009 

139127(17) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139127 

 COA: 291632 

Washtenaw CC: 07-000440-FC 

JOSEPH WEBSTER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 

28, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order 

was entered erroneously.
### §80a–2. Lands excluded from Sequoia National Forest and added to Kings Canyon National Park

For the purpose of facilitating park road maintenance, and to include in the park certain property that is desirable for future use and development, the following land situated in section 7, township 14 south, range 28 east, Mount Diablo meridian, is excluded from the Sequoia National Forest and added to the Kings Canyon National Park:

East half northeast quarter, east half west half northeast quarter, northeast quarter southeast quarter, east half northwest quarter southeast quarter, and those portions of the southeast quarter southeast quarter and of the east half southwest quarter southeast quarter, lying north of the right-of-way of State Highway 180.

(Pub. L. 85–666, §2, Aug. 14, 1958, 72 Stat. 617.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act Mar. 4, 1940, ch. 40, 54 Stat. 41, which comprises this subchapter.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 85818 / May 9, 2019

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-18151

In the Matter of 

BOHAI PHARMACEUTICALS GROUP INC.

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by Bohai Pharmaceuticals Group Inc. and the 

Commission has not chosen to review the decision on its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission's Rules 

of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to Bohai Pharmaceuticals Group Inc.2The order 

contained in that decision is hereby declared final. The initial decision ordered that, pursuant to 

Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registration of each class of registered 

securities of Bohai Pharmaceuticals Group Inc. is revoked. The revocation is effective as of May

10, 2019.

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

 Acting Secretary

 

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 Bohai Pharm. Grp. Inc., Initial Decision Release No. 1354 (Feb. 15, 2019), 2019 WL

653713. The Central Index Key number for Bohai Pharmaceuticals Group Inc. is: 1443242.
Order filed, July 09, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00173-CV

____________

NEGOTIATE ONE, INC., Appellant

V.

MEMBERS CHOICE CREDIT UNION, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1017454

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due April 15, 2015. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. On May 05, 2015, this court ordered the court reporter to file the record 

within 30 days. On May 07, 2015, the court reporter notified this court that the

appellant had not paid or made arrangements to pay for the record. On June 05, 

2015, the appellant’s attorney filed a docketing statement stating that he had paid 

for the deposit for the record. On June 11, 2015, the appellant filed a letter stating 
that the complete payment had been sent to the court reporter. On June 16, 2015, 

the court reporter filed a motion for extension of time to file the record which was 

GRANTED until July 01, 2015. The record has not been filed with the court. 

Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following 

order.

We order Gina Oliver, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. No further extension will be 

entertained absent exceptional circumstances. The trial and appellate courts are 

jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Gina Oliver does not timely file the record as ordered, we 

will issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the 

reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.61

                         LITHIUM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

                                 January 4, 2000

Dr. George R. Ferment
Lithium Technology Corporation
5115 Campus Drive
Plymouth Meeting, PA  19462

Dear Dr. Ferment:

      Reference is made to your employment agreement dated July 24, 1996, as
amended and extended (the "Employment Agreement"), with Lithium Technology
Corporation (the "Company").

      This shall confirm that the Employment Agreement is extended on the same
terms as set forth in the Employment Agreement until the later of (i) February
28, 2002 and (ii) one year after the closing of the merger between the Company
and Pacific Lithium Limited.

      This letter also confirms that as of November 1, 1999 you shall serve as
the President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Technical Officer and your
salary is at the rate of $155,000 per year commencing as of November 1, 1999.

      By signing below, you agree to and accept these terms. The terms of your
Employment Agreement are hereby ratified, approved, and confirmed except as
modified herein.

                                          Very truly yours,

                                          /s/ Ralph Ketchum
                                          Ralph Ketchum
                                          Chairman of Special Committee of
                                          the Board of Directors

Accepted and Agreed to:

/s/ George R. Ferment
--------------------------------------
Dr. George R. Ferment
§ 200.91 SEA counts of eligible children. To receive an allocation under part D, subpart 1 of Title I of the ESEA, an SEA must provide the Secretary with a count of children and youth under the age of 21 enrolled in a regular program of instruction operated or supported by State agencies in institutions or community day programs for neglected or delinquent children and youth and adult correctional institutions as specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. ( a ) *Enrollment.* ( 1 ) To be counted, a child or youth must be enrolled in a regular program of instruction for at least— ( i ) 20 hours per week if in an institution or community day program for neglected or delinquent children; or
( ii ) 15 hours per week if in an adult correctional institution.
( 2 ) The State agency must specify the date on which the enrollment of neglected or delinquent children is determined under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, except that the date specified must be— ( i ) Consistent for all institutions or community day programs operated by the State agency; and
( ii ) Represent a school day in the calendar year preceding the year in which funds become available.
( b ) *Adjustment of enrollment.* The SEA must adjust the enrollment for each institution or community day program served by a State agency by— ( 1 ) Multiplying the number determined in paragraph (a) of this section by the number of days per year the regular program of instruction operates; and
( 2 ) Dividing the result of paragraph (b)(1) of this section by 180.
( c ) *Date of submission.* The SEA must annually submit the data in paragraph (b) of this section no later than January 31.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1810-0060) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 6432)
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and (b))



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby individually
certifies in his capacity as an officer of USI Holdings Corporation (the Company) that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of and for the periods covered by such Report.



|                      |  |                                            
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 9, 2005 |  | /s/ ROBERT S. SCHNEIDER                    
|                      |  | Robert S. Schneider Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and (b)) and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by the above signatory to the extent of his
respective knowledge.



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
USI Holdings Corporation and will be retained by USI Holdings Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



51
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of CenterPoint Energy Houston
Electric, LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005
(the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Gary L. Whitlock, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Gary L. Whitlock
--------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Whitlock
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
March 24, 2006
### §460lll–31. Trust Fund

#### (a) Establishment

There is established in the Treasury of the United States a special interest-bearing fund known as the "Land Between the Lakes Trust Fund".

#### (b) Availability

Amounts in the Fund shall be available to the Secretary, until expended, for—

(1) public education, grants, and internships related to recreation, conservation, and multiple use land management in the Recreation Area; and

(2) regional promotion in the Recreation Area, in cooperation with development districts, chambers of commerce, and State and local governments.

#### (c) Deposits

The Tennessee Valley Authority shall deposit into the Fund $1,000,000 annually for each of the 5 fiscal years commencing in the first fiscal year of the transfer. Funding to carry out this section shall be derived from funding described in section 460lll–49 of this title.

(Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(e) [title V, §531], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–231, 2681–317.)
#### § 552.33 Media.

The Warden shall assign staff to handle all news releases and news media inquiries in accordance with the rule on Contact with News Media (see 28 CFR 540.65).