alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         313,553
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,020,754
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,860,217
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,891,765
<PP&E>                                       5,422,133
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,474,290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,766,609
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,968,532
<BONDS>                                         43,480
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,217,750
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,424,472
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,766,609
<SALES>                                     18,274,626
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,274,626
<CGS>                                       10,510,904
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,097,378
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               440,381
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              60,367
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (834,404)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (423,800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (410,604)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (410,604)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.34)


</TABLE>
### §284e. Vested property of United States; status of Foundation

All right, title, and interest in the Center shall be vested in the United States. Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to provide that the Foundation shall be considered to be a Federal agency or instrumentality for purposes of applying any law or regulation of the United States or of any State.

(Pub. L. 89–671, §6, as added Pub. L. 97–310, Oct. 14, 1982, 96 Stat. 1457.)
### SUBCHAPTER V—JUNIOR DUCK STAMP CONSERVATION AND DESIGN PROGRAM
#### Edward J. Culver, Appellant, v. Frank Wigsten, Respondent.

All concur.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Michael J. Gordon, Chief Financial Officer of BlastGard International, Inc., certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 of BlastGard International, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



May 15, 2007

/s/ Michael J. Gordon

Michael J. Gordon, Chief Financial Officer
### SUBCHAPTER II—COORDINATED MANAGEMENT OF SALMON AND STEELHEAD
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Division





,QUH       &DVH1R



  'HEWRUV    &KDSWHU





 ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

 FOR FAILURE TO ATTEND MEETING OF CREDITORS 

7KH8QLWHG6WDWHV7UXVWHHKDYLQJFHUWLILHGWKDWWKHDERYHGHEWRUVRUGHEWRU
VFRXQVHOKDs not

DSSHDUHGDWWKHVFKHGXOHGPHHWLQJRIFUHGLWRUVLWLVWKHUHIRUH

ORDEREDSXUVXDQWWR/RFDO5XOH%WKDWWKHDERYHFDVHEHGLVPLVVHGDQGLWLV

IXUWKHU

[If appropriate] ORDEREDWKDWWKH GHEWRUV SD\WKH EDODQFHRIWKH ILOLQJ IHHLQWKH

DPRXQWRIBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBWRWKH&OHUNRI&RXUWZLWKLQGD\VRIWKHGDWHRIWKLVRUGHU

DQGLWLVIXUWKHU

ORDEREDWKDWGLVPLVVDORIWKLVFDVHUHYHVWVWKHSURSHUW\RIWKHHVWDWHLQWKHHQWLW\LQZKLFK

VXFKSURSHUW\ZDVYHVWHGLPPHGLDWHO\EHIRUHWKHFRPPHQFHPHQWRIWKHFDVH7KHWUXVWHHQHHGQRW

ILOHDILQDOUHSRUWLQWKLVFDVHXQOHVVSURSHUW\RUPRQH\ZDVDGPLQLVWHUHG

:,//,$0&5(''(1

&OHUNRI&RXUW

'DWHBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB %\BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

        'HSXW\&OHUN

      127,&(2)-8'*0(172525'(5

      (17(5('21'2&.(7

 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB



>RGLVYHU@

Richmond

Andrew Thomas Dozier 16-32802-KLP

7

n/a

August 25, 2016

August 25, 2016

/s/Tammy Luedecke

Case 16-32802-KLP Doc 22 Filed 08/25/16 Entered 08/25/16 11:42:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS RULINGS

Release No. 6887/December 2, 2022

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-21241

In the Matter of :

:

JASON JIANXUN TANG, CPA : ORDER

The Securities and Exchange Commission instituted this proceeding against Respondent Jason 

Jianxun Tang, CPA, with an Order Instituting Proceedings (OIP), pursuant to Sections 4C and 21C of 

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 102(e) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice (ROP), 17 

C.F.R. § 201.102(e), on November 17, 2022. Pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement, the OIP 

made various findings of fact and conclusions of law, imposed remedial sanctions and a cease-anddesist order, and ordered a hearing before the undersigned Administrative Law Judge to determine 

what, if any civil penalties are appropriate under Section 21C of the Exchange Act.

In response to the Order of November 18, 2022, the parties have filed a Joint Notice of 

Availability for Prehearing Conference. See Jason Jianxun Tang, CPA, Admin. Proc. Rulings Release 

No. 6880, 2022 SEC LEXIS 3163 (A.L.J.). The Notice states that the parties intend to ask for a stay of 

the proceeding. If the parties’ reason for the stay request is for the Commission to consider an offer of 

settlement, a prehearing conference is unnecessary, and the parties should request the stay in writing. 

If there is any other reason for the prehearing conference, the undersigned is available on December 

12, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. EST. The parties should clarify this by December 6, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/S/ Carol Fox Foelak 

Carol Fox Foelak

Administrative Law Judge
### §825s–4. Southwestern Power Administration; deposit and availability of advance payments

Notwithstanding section 3302 of title 31, beginning in fiscal year 2005 and thereafter, such funds as are received by the Southwestern Power Administration from any State, municipality, corporation, association, firm, district, or individual as advance payment for work that is associated with Southwestern's transmission facilities, consistent with that authorized in section 825s of this title, shall be credited to this account and be available until expended.

(Pub. L. 108–447, div. C, title III, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 2956.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2005, and also as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005, and not as part of the Federal Power Act which generally comprises this chapter. Section is based on the proviso in the paragraph under the headings "POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS" and "Operation and Maintenance, Southwestern Power Administration" in title III of div. C of Pub. L. 108–447.

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following prior appropriation act:

Pub. L. 108–137, title III, Dec. 1, 2003, 117 Stat. 1858.
#### § 334.3 [Reserved]
§ 76.11 Notice of hearing. ( a ) When the Judge receives the complaint and answer, the Judge shall cause to be served a Notice of Hearing upon the parties in the manner prescribed by 28 CFR 76.6(d).
( b ) Such notice shall include: ( 1 ) The time and place and nature of the hearing. In fixing the time and place of the hearing, the Judge will attempt to minimize the costs to the parties;
( 2 ) The legal authority and jurisdiction under which the hearing is to be held;
( 3 ) The description of the procedures for the conduct of the hearing;
( 4 ) A notice that the respondent party may waive the right to an oral hearing and request that the matter be determined on written motions and written submission of the evidence; and
( 5 ) Such other matters as the Judge deems appropriate.
### §577a. Conserving shore line beauty for recreational use of public lands in northern Minnesota; regulation of logging

The principle of conserving the natural beauty of shore lines for recreational use shall apply to all Federal lands which border upon any boundary lake or stream contiguous to this area, or any other lake or stream within this area which is now or eventually to be in general use for boat or canoe travel, and that for the purpose of carrying out this principle logging of all such shores to a depth of four hundred feet from the natural water line is forbidden except as the Forest Service of the Department of Agriculture may see fit in particular instances to vary the distance for practical reasons: Provided, That in no case shall logging of any timber other than diseased, insect infested, dying, or dead be permitted closer to the natural shore line than two hundred feet, except where necessary to open areas for banking grounds, landings, and other uses connected with logging operations.

(July 10, 1930, ch. 881, §2, 46 Stat. 1021.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of all officers, agencies, and employees of Department of Agriculture transferred, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Agriculture by Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1953, §1, eff. June 4, 1953, 18 F.R. 3219, 67 Stat. 633, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
**EXHIBIT
      23.2**






**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form S-3 (Registration Nos. 333-63423 and 333-29225) and Form S-8 (Nos.
      33-37279, 33-21668, 33-21667, 33-47664, 33-51178, 33-66136, 33-62314, 33-65352,
      333-38795, 333-38797, and 333-68863) of Hercules Incorporated of our report
      dated March 16, 2005, relating to the financial statements and financial
      statement schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.










PricewaterhouseCoopers
      LLP


February
      28, 2007
#### Barry R. Ostrager, Appellant, v Rhinebeck Equine, L.L.P., et al., Respondents.

[822 NYS2d 711]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered February 3, 2006, dismissing the complaint, and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered January 19, 2006, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from the aforesaid order unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the ensuing judgment.

Defendant doctors established their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment based on their affidavits that the treatment of plaintiffs mares was consistent with accepted veterinary practice. Plaintiffs conclusory allegations of malpractice, unsupported by competent evidence tending to establish the es*239sential elements of his claim, were insufficient to defeat defendants’ motion (see *Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324-325 [1986]). Concur—Friedman, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Nardelli and Gonzalez, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6455

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JASON J. SMITH, a/k/a Phillip Daniel Smith,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater,

District Judge. (CR-97-17, CA-00-21-3)

Submitted: July 3, 2001 Decided: July 20, 2001

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul E. Lane, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Thomas

Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jason J. Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Smith, Nos. CR-97-17; CA-00-21-3

(N.D.W. Va. Feb. 9, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
§ 650.207 Plans, specifications and estimates. ( a ) Emphasis shall be placed on erosion control in the preparation of plans, specifications and estimates.
( b ) All reasonable steps shall be taken to insure that highway project designs for the control of erosion and sedimentation and the protection of water quality comply with applicable standards and regulations of other agencies.
[39 FR 36332, Oct. 9, 1974]
----

            DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK         

of 19 May 2006         

amending Decision ECB/2001/16 on the allocation of monetary income of the national central banks of participating Member States from the financial year 2002

(ECB/2006/7)

(2006/385/EC)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 32 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Decision ECB/2001/16 is amended as follows:

Article 2

Final provision

This Decision shall enter into force one day following its adoption.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 19 May 2006.

The President of the ECB

Jean-Claude TRICHET            

----

(1)OJ L 337, 20.12.2001, p. 55. Decision as amended by Decision ECB/2003/22 (OJ L 9, 15.1.2004, p. 39).

(2)OJ L 139, 11.5.1998, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2169/2005 (OJ L 346, 29.12.2005, p. 1).

----

ANNEX I

Paragraph 1 of Part A of Annex I is replaced by the following:

----

ANNEX II

Annex III is replaced by the following:

                     ‘ANNEX III

A.   First contingent adjustment

If the average total value of banknotes in circulation in the cash change-over year is lower than the average total euro value of banknotes in circulation during the reference period (including those denominated in the national currency of the Member State that has adopted the euro and translated into euro at the daily foreign exchange reference rate during the reference period), then the coefficient “S” applying to the cash change-over year in accordance with Article 4(1) must be reduced with retroactive effect in the same proportion as the decrease in the total average of banknotes in circulation.

The reduction must not result in a coefficient lower than 0,8606735. If this derogation is applied, one quarter of the resulting reduction in the NCBs’ compensatory amounts (“C”) applicable in the cash change-over year must be added to each of the NCBs’ compensatory amounts applicable in the second to fifth year following the cash change-over year under Article 4(1).

B.   Second contingent adjustment

If those NCBs for which the compensatory amount referred to in Article 4(1) is a positive figure pay net remuneration on intra-Eurosystem balances on banknotes in circulation that results in a net expense when added to the item “net result of pooling of monetary income” in their profit and loss account at the end of the year, then the coefficient “S” applying to the cash change-over year in accordance with Article 4(1) must be reduced to the extent necessary to eliminate this condition.

The reduction must not result in a coefficient lower than 0,8606735. If this derogation is applied, one quarter of the resulting reduction in the NCBs’ compensatory amounts (“C”) applicable in the cash change-over year must be added to each of the NCBs’ compensatory amounts applicable in the second to fifth year following the cash change-over year under Article 4(1).’                  

----
#### § 1210.7 Apportionment of withheld funds after compliance.

Funds withheld from a State from apportionment under § 1210.4, which remain available for apportionment under § 1210.6(a), will be made available to the State if it conforms to the requirements of §§ 1210.4 and 1210.5 before the last day of the period of availability as defined in § 1210.6(a).
HECO Exhibit 99.3

Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc.

RECONCILIATION OF ELECTRIC UTILITY OPERATING

INCOME PER HEI AND HECO CONSOLIDATED

STATEMENTS OF INCOME



|                                                                                                                            |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | - | ------- | ---- |  | - | ------- | -
|Years ended December 31                                                                                                     |  | 2008 |         |   | 2007 |   |         | 2006 | 
|(in thousands)                                                                                                              |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |      | 
|                                                                                                                            |  |      |        
|Operating income from regulated and nonregulated activities before income taxes (per HEI Consolidated Statements of Income) |  | $    | 191,359 |   |      | $ | 130,585 |      |  | $ | 166,718 |  
|Deduct:                                                                                                                     |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Income taxes on regulated activities                                                                                        |  |      | (56,307 | ) |      |   | (34,126 | )    |  |   | (47,381 | )
|Revenues from nonregulated activities                                                                                       |  |      | (6,711  | ) |      |   | (9,356  | )    |  |   | (4,478  | )
|Add:                                                                                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Expenses from nonregulated activities                                                                                       |  |      | 1,596   |   |      |   | 13,172  |      |  |   | 2,296   |  
|                                                                                                                            |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Operating income from regulated activities after income taxes (per HECO Consolidated Statements of Income)                  |  | $    | 129,937 |   |      | $ | 100,275 |      |  | $ | 117,155 |  
|                                                                                                                            |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |