alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1748/2005

of 24 October 2005         

amending the representative prices and additional duties for the import of certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1011/2005 for the 2005/2006 marketing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1423/95 of 23 June 1995 laying down detailed implementing rules for the import of products in the sugar sector other than molasses (2), and in particular the second sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 1(2), and Article 3(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The representative prices and additional duties on imports of the products referred to in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1423/95, as fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1011/2005 for the 2005/2006 marketing year are hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 25 October 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 October 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 141, 24.6.1995, p. 16. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 624/98 (OJ L 85, 20.3.1998, p. 5).

(3)OJ L 170, 1.7.2005, p. 35.

(4)OJ L 253, 29.9.2005, p. 18.

----

ANNEX

Amended representative prices and additional duties applicable to imports of white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 1702 90 99  applicable from 25 October 2005

----

(1)  Fixed for the standard quality defined in Annex I.II to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 (OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1).

(2)  Fixed for the standard quality defined in Annex I.I to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 (OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1).

(3)  Fixed per 1 % sucrose content.

----
# Official Journal C 262A/31 O

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 262A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4931 October 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 262A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4931 October 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 262A/1 | Directorate General Environment (DG ENV) — Publication of a notice of vacancy for the post of Principal Adviser (grade AD 14) — COM/2006/10033 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

Commission

2006/C 262A/1

Directorate General Environment (DG ENV) — Publication of a notice of vacancy for the post of Principal Adviser (grade AD 14) — COM/2006/10033

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2006023EN.01S00301.xml

| 31.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/s3

---

NOTICE

NOTICE

On 1 February 2006, in Official Journal of the European Union C 25 A, the ‘Common catalogue of vegetable species — First supplement to the 24th complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/..........). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see overleaf).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L,C,CA,CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex.

Image

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Translog : Defensetransportation system bulletin.**
 
2008:SummerFall/Winter
2009:Spring/AlmanacSummerFall
2010:AlmanacSpring/Summer
 
Some earlyissues (archived from microfiche) are also available here: https://archive.org/details/pub_translog?tab=collection
 
SuDoc Number:D 101.66/2-2:
Item Number:0329-B
CGP systemNumber:000568451
 
February 6, 2020
### §460l–4. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 88–578, title I, §1(b), Sept. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 897, which stated purposes of Pub. L. 88–578, was transferred and is set out as a note under section 100101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Derrick Wilson, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 814]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John J. Brunetti, A.J.), rendered October 23, 2000. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree (Penal Law § 220.21 [1]) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (§ 220.16 [1]). Defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in failing to charge the jury on the limited value of evidence of flight. The record establishes, however, that the charge concerning evidence of flight was requested by the People rather than defendant, and neither the People nor defendant objected when the court failed to give that charge. Defendant therefore failed to preserve his contention for our review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Jiggetts,*23 AD3d 582 [2005], *lv denied*6 NY3d 814 [2006]; *People v John,*221 AD2d 564 [1995], *lv denied*87 NY2d 922 [1996]), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(see*CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). Defendant also failed to preserve for our review his contentions that he was prejudiced by the court’s charge on circumstantial evidence *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Pulley,*302 AD2d 899 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 565 [2003]), and that the prosecutor engaged in misconduct during summation *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, those contentions are without merit. The court’s charge conveyed the proper legal standard to the jury *(see People v Horace,*277 AD2d 957 [2000], *lv denied*96 NY2d 784 [2001]; *see generally People v Sanchez,*61 NY2d 1022, 1024 [1984]), and any alleged prosecutorial misconduct during summation did not cause such substantial prejudice to defendant that he was denied due process of law *(see People v Smith,*266 AD2d 889 [1999], *lv denied*94 NY2d 907 [2000]).

We reject the further contention of defendant in his pro se *1277supplemental brief that the People failed to establish that he placed the cocaine in the drain pipe and thus that the evidence is legally insufficient to establish his possession of the cocaine. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we conclude that the circumstantial evidence is legally sufficient to establish that defendant possessed the cocaine that was found in the drain pipe *(see generally People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). We have reviewed the remaining contentions of defendant in his main brief and pro se supplemental brief and conclude that they are without merit. Present—Scudder, J.P, Martoche, Centra and Pine, JJ.
| Home | Jobs | Fast Answers | Site Map | **Search** |
|----------------------------------------------------|
|                                                    |
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications.
**Title     
Military    cryptanalysis /
 
**SuDoc****Number  
[if !vml]>[endif]>D 1.2:C 88/14
**Item    Number  
[if !vml]>[endif]>0306 (online)
**System    Number  
000999322[if !supportMisalignedColumns]>   [endif]>  
**Parts:     Part I  |  Part II | Part III  |   Part IV
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

 
 
 
Last updated:  September 24, 2016  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov/
 ********** |
|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Frances Stephens, Respondent, v. Elizabeth Arden et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.
Exhibit 12

                              The Gillette Company

                       Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

Dollars in millions

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                2003        2002        2001        2000        1999        1998
                                                             ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------
<S>                                                          <C>             <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Earnings:
     Income from continuing operations before income taxes   $   1,964       1,752       1,342       1,288       1,912       1,656
     Interest expense                                               54          84         145         223         136          94
     Interest portion of rental expense                             41          43          31          25          20          17
     Amortization of capitalized interest                           10          10           9           6           5           4


                                                             ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------
     Earnings available for fixed charges                    $   2,069       1,889       1,527       1,542       2,073       1,771
                                                             =========   =========   =========   =========   =========   =========

Fixed Charges:
     Interest expense                                        $      54          84         145         223         136          94
     Interest capitalized                                            2           4          11          23          13          18
     Interest portion of rental expense                             41          43          31          25          20          17

                                                             ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------
     Total fixed charges                                     $      97         131         187         271         169         129
                                                             =========   =========   =========   =========   =========   =========


Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                21.4        14.5         8.2         5.7        12.3        13.7
                                                             =========   =========   =========   =========   =========   =========
</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Archer K. Palmer, Respondent. Seneca Hotel Corporation, Appellant; Frieda S. Miller, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

*706All concur.
§ 300.119 Technical assistance and training activities. Each SEA must carry out activities to ensure that teachers and administrators in all public agencies— ( a ) Are fully informed about their responsibilities for implementing § 300.114; and
( b ) Are provided with technical assistance and training necessary to assist them in this effort.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0030) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(5))
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10s3


                        HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
                         EXECUTIVE LIFE INSURANCE PLAN

                          (Effective January 1, 1994)


                              Second Amendment


                 Houston Industries Incorporated, a Texas corporation, (the
"Company"), having established the Houston Industries Incorporated Executive
Life Insurance Plan, effective January 1, 1994 (the "Plan"), and having
reserved the right under Section 6.1 thereof to amend the Plan does hereby
amend the Plan, effective August 6, 1997, as follows:

                 1.       Section 2.6 of the Plan is hereby amended in its
entirety to read as follows:

                 "2.6     'Company'  shall mean Houston Industries
         Incorporated, a Texas corporation, and any successor thereto."

                 2.       Section 2.9 of the Plan is hereby amended in its
entirety to read as follows:

                 "2.9     'Eligible Employee' shall mean an individual who is
         employed by the Company or one of its wholly owned subsidiaries on or
         after the Effective Date who is not on the payroll of NorAm Energy
         Corp. or any of its divisions or subsidiaries and who (a) is (i) an
         officer of the Company or one of its wholly owned subsidiaries at the
         level of Vice President or above or (ii) a key executive of the
         Company or one of its wholly owned subsidiaries and has been
         designated by the Committee to participate in the Plan and (b) has
         submitted to the Insurer a properly completed application for life
         insurance under this Plan and such application has been approved by
         the Insurer.  In addition to those individuals described above, all
         Directors of the Company on or after the Effective Date who are not
         otherwise eligible as Employees of the Company shall automatically
         participate in this Plan."





<PAGE>   2
                 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused these presents to
be executed by its duly authorized officers in a number of copies, all of which
shall constitute one and the same instrument, which may be sufficiently
evidenced by any executed copy hereof, this 26th day of February, 1998, but
effective as of August 6, 1997.

                                        HOUSTON INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED



                                        By  /s/ LEE W. HOGAN
                                          ----------------------------------
                                          Name:  Lee W. Hogan
                                               -----------------------------
                                          Title: Executive Vice President
                                                ----------------------------

ATTEST:

/s/ RICHARD B. DAUPHIN
----------------------------------




                                     -2-
#### § 1300.36 Appeal of written decision by a Regional Administrator.

The State shall submit an appeal of any written decision by a Regional Administrator regarding the administration of the grants in writing, signed by the Governor's Representative for Highway Safety, to the Regional Administrator. The Regional Administrator shall promptly forward the appeal to the NHTSA Associate Administrator, Regional Operations and Program Delivery. The decision of the NHTSA Associate Administrator shall be final and shall be transmitted in writing to the Governor's Representative for Highway Safety through the Regional Administrator.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5

<S>                                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                          JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                                        0
<SECURITIES>                                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                              27,040
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                         74,737
<PP&E>                                                                   64,814
<DEPRECIATION>                                                           17,791
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        1,182,960
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                   402,858
<BONDS>                                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                                 11,338
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                                              231,237
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                            182,960
<SALES>                                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                              0
<CGS>                                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         18,025
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                         (18,025)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                     (18,025)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                            (18,025)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                              .002
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                              .002


</TABLE>
### §6451. Establishment

There is established a task force to lead, coordinate, and strengthen Federal Government actions to better preserve, conserve, and restore coral reef ecosystems, to be known as the "United States Coral Reef Task Force" (in this subchapter referred to as the "Task Force").

(Pub. L. 117–263, div. J, title C, §10011, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3951.)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2120

TONY DUPREE, Plaintiff - Appellant, and SHARONDA THOMAS, Plaintiff, versus TRINITY HOME IMPROVEMENT, INCORPORATED; LELAND WHEATLEY, C.E.O.; TROY WHEATLEY, President; PAULA WHEATLEY, Vice-President; NORMAN WHITELOCK, Vice-President, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-01- 271-L) Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 28, 2002 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tony DuPree, Appellant Pro Se.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:Tony DuPree seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001) employment discrimination complaint as to some, but not all, Defendants. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
‘Tonto National Forest 2
Supervisor's Office a
UTM Zone 12 NAD83
10 Feb 2010

|| Bartlett Dam Quadrangle 00102 0.4 06 08
Miles
#### Sprouse *v.*Western & Atlantic Railroad Co. (two cases).

February 26, 1910.

Per Curiam.

These cases came on before the Supreme Court upon a writ of error; and the same being for decision by a full bench of six Justices, who are evenly divided in opinion (Chief Justice Fish and Justices Atkinson and Holden being in favor of a reversal and Presiding Justice Evans and Justices Lumpkin and Beck being in favor of an’ affirmance), it is considered and .adjudged that the judgment of the court below in each case stand affirmed by operation of law.

*163Actions for damages. Before Judge Gober. Cobb superior court.

November 7, 1908.

*Arnold*<fi *Arnold,*and *IS. B. Moss,*for plaintiffs.

*D. W. Blair*and *Tyo, Peeples & Jordan,*for defendant.
#### § 236.5 Fingerprints and photographs.

Every alien 14 years of age or older against whom proceedings based on deportability under section 237 of the Act are commenced under this part by service of a notice to appear shall be fingerprinted and photographed. Such fingerprints and photographs shall be made available to Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies upon request to the district director or chief patrol agent having jurisdiction over the alien's record. Any such alien, regardless of his or her age, shall be photographed and/or fingerprinted if required by any immigration officer authorized to issue a notice to appear. Every alien 14 years of age or older who is found to be inadmissible to the United States and ordered removed by an immigration judge shall be fingerprinted, unless during the preceding year he or she has been fingerprinted at an American consular office.