alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

November 13, 2023

____________________________________

IN THE MATTER OF :

:

Agri-Fintech Holdings, Inc. : ORDER OF SUSPENSION

: OF TRADING

File No. 500-1 : 

:

____________________________________:

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that that the public interest and the 

protection of investors require a suspension in the trading of the securities of Agri-Fintech 

Holdings, Inc. (“Agri-Fintech”) (CIK No. 0001648365) because of questions and concerns 

regarding the adequacy and accuracy of publicly available information in the marketplace 

concerning Agri-Fintech and its assets. 

According to Agri-Fintech’s public filings, including its Form 10-K for FY 2022, its 

Forms 10-Q for FY 2022 Q1 and Q2, and its October 6, 2023 press release, Agri-Fintech sold its 

sole operating subsidiary, Tingo Mobile Ltd., to Tingo Group, Inc. (“Tingo Group”) (CIK No. 

0000854800), on December 1, 2022, in exchange for significant holdings of Tingo Group 

common stock and convertible Series A and Series B Preferred stock, which represent 75% of 

Tingo Group’s outstanding common stock on a fully converted basis. Agri-Fintech’s only 

material asset is its significant holdings of Tingo Group stock, and Agri-Fintech currently 

operates as a temporary investment company pursuant to Section 3(a) of the Investment 

Company Act of 1940 and Rule 3a-2 thereunder. It appears to the Securities and Exchange 

Commission that there is a lack of adequate and accurate information concerning the securities of 

Tingo Group because of questions and concerns regarding the adequacy and accuracy of publicly 

available information in the marketplace concerning Tingo Group, including press releases, 
periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission—including Forms 10-K, 10-Q, 

and 8-K—and other publicly disseminated statements, since at least May 10, 2022, about the 

financial statements and business operations of Tingo Group and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, 

including Tingo Mobile Ltd.

Agri-Fintech is a Nevada corporation whose principal place of business is listed as 

Draper, UT. The common stock of Agri-Fintech is quoted on OTC Link whose parent company 

is OTC Markets Group, Inc., under the symbol “TMNA,” and has 8 market makers, and is 

eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Rule 15c-2-11(f)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act 

of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors 

require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. 

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Exchange Act, that 

trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 4:00 a.m.

EST, on November 14, 2023 through 11:59 p.m. EST, on November 28, 2023.

By the Commission.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
Editorial Note on Part 1211
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1211 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003.

§ 1211.4 Waiver of documents for returning residents. ( a ) Pursuant to the authority contained in section 211(b) of the Act, an alien previously lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence who, upon return from a temporary absence was inadmissible because of failure to have or to present a valid passport, immigrant visa, reentry permit, border crossing card, or other document required at the time of entry, may be granted a waiver of such requirement in the discretion of the district director if the district director determines that such alien: ( 1 ) Was not otherwise inadmissible at the time of entry, or having been otherwise inadmissible at the time of entry is with respect thereto qualified for an exemption from deportability under section 237(a)(1)(H) of the Act; and
( 2 ) Is not otherwise subject to removal.
( b ) Denial of a waiver by the district director is not appealable but shall be without prejudice to renewal of an application and reconsideration in proceedings before the immigration judge.
[62 FR 10346, Mar. 6, 1997. Duplicated from § 211.4 at 68 FR 9835, Feb. 28, 2003]
Exhibit 32.2

ATLANTIC SECURITY, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Atlantic Security, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Gregory Chan, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



/s/ Gregory Chan
------------------------------------
Gregory Chan
Chief Financial Officer
February 17, 2005
§ 1207.3 Waivers of inadmissibility. ( a ) *Authority.* Section 207(c)(3) of the Act sets forth grounds of inadmissibility under section 212(a) of the Act which are not applicable and those which may be waived in the case of an otherwise qualified refugee and the conditions under which such waivers may be approved. Officers in charge of overseas offices are delegated authority to initiate the necessary investigations to establish the facts in each waiver application pending before them and to approve or deny such waivers.
( b ) *Filing requirements.* The applicant for a waiver must submit Form I-602, Application by Refugee for Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility, with the Service office processing his or her case. The burden is on the applicant to show that the waiver should be granted based upon humanitarian grounds, family unity, or the public interest. The applicant shall be notified in writing of the decision, including the reasons for denial, if the application is denied. There is no appeal from such decision.
[62 FR 10336, Mar. 6, 1997. Duplicated from § 207.3 at 68 FR 9833, Feb. 28, 2003]
EXHIBIT 32.01

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Ocean  Power
Corporation  (the  "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
Michael Hopper, as Authorized Signatory of the Company,  certifies,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


        /s/ MICHAEL HOPPER
        --------------------
Name:   Michael Hopper
Title:  Authorized Signatory
Date:   January 31, 2008

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
..Bridgette.Lohrman.. To Jessica Winkler/R10/USEPAlUS@EPA 

<bridgette.lohrman@noaa.gov cc > 

bee 04/06/200903:27 PM 

Subject NMFS Species List - Eulachon 

~ This message has been replied to and forwarded. 

Jessica, 

If you haven't already, you should be receiving a response to the 

species list request in the mail for the dredge material disposal site 

off of the Siuslaw River. It was signed March 30, 2009. One species 

which has been recently proposed for listing and may be in the action 

area but was not included in the letter is the southern distinct 

population segment of eulachon. They were recently proposed for listing 

on March 13, 2009. Please see NMFS' webpage for information on this 

proposed listing. Individuals use the nearshore area and are found 

foraging in depths of 15 to 182 meters. 

http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/Other-Marine-Species/Eulachon.cfm 

-Bridgette 

Bridgette Lohrman 

Oregon State Habitat Office 

Habitat Conservation Division 

NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service 

1201 NE Lloyd Blvd, Suite 1100 

Portland, Oregon 97232 

Phone: 503.230.5422 

Fax: 503.231.6893 
"Bridgette.Lohrman" To Jessica Winkler/R10/USEPAlUS@EPA 

<bridgette.lohrman@noaa.gov cc Alison Agness <Alison.Agness@noaa.gov> > 

bec 04/08/2009 02: 16 PM 

Subject NMFS Species List - Marine Mammals 

I!\i:I; This message has been forwarded. 

Jessica, 

This email is to amend the species list from NMFS dated March 30, 2009. 

Please remove the sei whale, sperm whale, loggerhead sea turtle, green 

sea turtle, and olive ridley sea turtle from the species list. These 

species will not be in the project vicinity. 

-Bridgette 

Bridgette Lohrman 

Oregon State Habitat Office 

Habitat Conservation Division 

NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service 

1201 NE Lloyd Blvd, Suite 1100 

Portland, Oregon 97232 

Phone: 503.230.5422 

Fax: 503.231.6893
#### § 650.809 Movable span bridges.

A fixed bridge shall be selected wherever practicable. If there are social, economic, environmental or engineering reasons which favor the selection of a movable bridge, a cost benefit analysis to support the need for the movable bridge shall he prepared as a part of the preliminary plans.
#### § 101.111 Conduct.

Parties and their representatives are expected to conduct themselves with honor and dignity and observe judicial standards of practice and ethics in all proceedings. They should not indulge in offensive personalities, unseemly wrangling, or intemperate accusations or characterizations. A representative of any party whether or not a lawyer shall observe the traditional responsibilities of lawyers as officers of the court and use his best efforts to restrain his client from improprieties in connection with a proceeding.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

RICHARD OLIVER,

Appellant

v.

MR. TYREE C. BLOCKER, STATE POLICE 

COMMISSIONER,

Appellee

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 34 EAP 2023

Appeal from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court entered on 

August 28, 2023, at No. 256 MD 

2020.

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: September 26, 2024

AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2024, the order of the Commonwealth 

Court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,079
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 684
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,395
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,395
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,684
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,684)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,684)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.002)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.002)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. Section 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Q Comm International, Inc. (the
        "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on the date hereof (the
        "Report"), I, Michael D. Keough, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
        certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
        906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will
        be
        retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
        request.
 
 /s/
        Michael D.
        Keough
 
 Michael
        D. Keough
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 
 November
        14, 2005
###### Editorial Note on Part 1216

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1216 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10353, Mar. 5, 2003.

#### § 1216.1 Definition of conditional permanent resident.

A *conditional permanent resident* is an alien who has been lawfully admitted for permanent residence within the meaning of section 101(a)(20) of the Act, except that a conditional permanent resident is also subject to the conditions and responsibilities set forth in section 216 or 216A of the Act, whichever is applicable, and part 216 of this chapter. Unless otherwise specified, the rights, privileges, responsibilities and duties which apply to all other lawful permanent residents apply equally to conditional permanent residents, including but not limited to the right to apply for naturalization (if otherwise eligible), the right to file petitions on behalf of qualifying relatives, the privilege of residing permanently in the United States as an immigrant in accordance with the immigration laws, such status not having changed; the duty to register with the Selective Service System, when required; and the responsibility for complying with all laws and regulations of the United States. All references within this chapter to lawful permanent residents apply equally to conditional permanent residents, unless otherwise specified. The conditions of section 216 of the Act shall not apply to lawful permanent resident status based on a self-petitioning relationship under section 204(a)(1)(A)(iii), 204(a)(1)(A)(iv), 204(a)(1)(b)(ii), or 204(a)(1)(B)(iii) of the Act or based on eligibility as the derivative child of a self-petitioning spouse under section 204(a)(1)(A)(iii) or 204(a)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act, regardless of the date on which the marriage to the abusive citizen or lawful permanent resident occurred.

[53 FR 30018, Aug. 10, 1988, as amended at 59 FR 26590, May 23, 1994; 61 FR 13079, Mar. 26, 1996]
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3578 — BP/Nova Chemicals/JV)

(2005/C 187/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 1 July 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
#### § 680.100 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to prescribe minimum standards and requirements for projects funded under the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) Formula Program and projects for the construction of publicly accessible electric vehicle (EV) chargers that are funded with funds made available under Title 23, United States Code, including any EV charging infrastructure project funded with Federal funds that is treated as a project on a Federal-aid highway.
Searched for **http://trade.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://trade.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
-  Home 
-  About Us 

# In This Section

                      -  The GLS Today                          -  What does the GLS do? 
                        -  The St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation 
                        -  The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway System 
                        -  Meet the Administrator 
                        -  Meet Our Team 
                        -  Careers at the GLS 
                        -  Contact the GLS 
                      -  Historic Photos and Other Artifacts 

# Adam Tindall-Schlicht

### Administrator

Adam Tindall-Schlicht serves as the eleventh Administrator of the Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (GLS), an operating administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Appointed by President Joe Biden on November 6, 2022, Administrator Tindall-Schlicht oversees the federal corporation responsible for the operation and maintenance of the U.S. portion of the St. Lawrence Seaway between Montréal and Lake Erie.

Prior to his appointment as Administrator, Adam Tindall-Schlicht was the Director of Port Milwaukee from August 2018 until October 2022, serving as a member of the mayor’s cabinet. As Port Director, Mr. Tindall-Schlicht oversaw and directed the port’s multimodal, commercial, and passenger operations, which generates over $100 million in local economic activity annually. In addition to his responsibilities as Port Director, Mr. Tindall-Schlicht was appointed by Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers as both a Commissioner of the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission in 2020 and a member of the Board of Directors of the Great Lakes Protection Fund in 2022. He also previously served as President of the Wisconsin Commercial Ports Association. Administrator Tindall-Schlicht returns to GLS where he previously worked in both Washington, D.C. and Cleveland, Ohio, on marine transportation, international marketing, and Great Lakes Seaway System shipping from 2010 to 2018.

A native of Oak Creek, Wisconsin, Administrator Tindall-Schlicht holds a bachelor’s degree in political science from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and a master’s degree in Public Administration from American University in Washington, D.C. He has worked and volunteered abroad extensively, including in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Kenya, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Rwanda, South Africa, Switzerland, Tanzania, and the United Kingdom. Administrator Tindall-Schlicht is an ordained minister, and he officiates numerous marriage ceremonies each year. 

Administrator Tindall-Schlicht’s husband, Aaron, is a critical care and surgical nurse. 

# # # # #
STATE OF NEVADA 

Department of Conservation & Natural Resources 

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

Jared Blumenfeld 

Regional Administrator 

ORA-l, USEPA Region 9 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco CA 94105 

May 9, 2013 

Brian Sandoval, Governor 

Leo M. Drozdoff, P.E., Director 

Colleen Cripps, Ph.D., Administrator 

RE: Supplement to the Washoe County Portion ofthe Nevada State Implementation Plan 

for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS: Demonstration of Adequacy. 

Dear Mr. Blumenfeld: 

On behalf of Governor Sandoval, as his appointed designee, the Nevada Division of 

Environmental Protection (NDEP) is submitting supporting documentation for the Washoe 

County Portion of the Nevada State Implementation Plan for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS: 

Demonstration of Adequacy. 

The Washoe County ozone infrastructure state implementation plan (SIP) was adopted by the 

Washoe County District Board of Health (WCDBH) on February 28,2013 after a 30-day public 

notice period. The minutes from that meeting were not available for the AprillO, 2013 Nevada 

State Implementation Plan for the 2008 8-HourOzone NAAQS: Demonstration of Adequacy 

submittal. Therefore, as we advised in the AprillO, 2013 transmittal to the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, the NDEP is hereby submitting one hard copy and one exact duplicate of the 

hard copy in electronic form of the approved WCDBH minutes from the February 28,2013 

public hearing and evidence of adoption ofthe Washoe County ozone infrastructure SIP. 

If you should have any questions about this submittal or require additional clarification, you may 

contact Rob Bamford, Chief, Bureau of Air Quality Planning at (775) 687-9330. 

Enclosures 

Sincerely, 

Colleen Cripps, Ph.D. 

Administrator 
Jared Blumenfeld 

Page2 

May 9, 2013 

cc w/o enclosures: 

Cory Hunt, Policy Analyst, Office of the Governor 

Amy Zimpfer, Associate Director, Air Division, USEPA Region IX (AIR-1) 

Doris Lo, Acting Chief, Planning Office, USEPA Region IX (AIR-2) 

Kevin Dick, Director, Air Quality Management Division, Washoe County Health District 

ec w/o enclosures 

Leo Drozdoff, Director, Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources 

Michael Elges, Deputy Administrator, NDEP 

Rob Bamford, Chief, Bureau of Air Quality Planning, NDEP 

Certified Mail No. 9171 9690 0935 0012 2793 23
NO. 07-05-0048-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

AUGUST 3, 2005

______________________________

ROY HAYES JOHNSON, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 48,928-E; HONORABLE DAVID GLEASON, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Following a plea of not guilty, appellant Roy Hayes Johnson was convicted of

delivery of a controlled substance and punishment was assessed at 15 years confinement.

Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on February 14, 2005, and the reporter’s record was

filed on April 4, 2005. The clerk’s record has not been filed and three requests for
2

extensions of time have been filed all indicating appellant has not paid nor made

arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record; the first two were granted, and the third filed on

August 2, 2005, is rendered moot by our disposition today. By letter dated July 6, 2005,

the Court requested that retained counsel, Ronald T. Spriggs, certify compliance with the

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure regarding the clerk’s record by July 26, 2005, and also

extended the deadline in which to file the clerk’s record to August 1, 2005. Counsel was

notified that failure to comply might result in dismissal per Rule 37.3(b). Counsel did not

respond and the clerk’s record has not been filed.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with a directive of this

Court. 

Per Curiam

Do not publish.