alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 372I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 372I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 639 November 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 372I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 639 November 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1655 of 6 November 2020 implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1890 concerning restrictive measures in view of Turkey’s unauthorised drilling activities in the Eastern Mediterranean | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1656 of 6 November 2020 on Union support for the activities of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in the areas of nuclear security and in the framework of the implementation of the EU Strategy against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction | 4 |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1657 of 6 November 2020 amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/1894 concerning restrictive measures in view of Turkey’s unauthorised drilling activities in the Eastern Mediterranean | 16 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1655 of 6 November 2020 implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1890 concerning restrictive measures in view of Turkey’s unauthorised drilling activities in the Eastern Mediterranean

1

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1656 of 6 November 2020 on Union support for the activities of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in the areas of nuclear security and in the framework of the implementation of the EU Strategy against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction

4

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1657 of 6 November 2020 amending Decision (CFSP) 2019/1894 concerning restrictive measures in view of Turkey’s unauthorised drilling activities in the Eastern Mediterranean

16

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS. 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Markland Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended DECEMBER 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned chief executive officer and chief financial
officer of the Company, certify, to their best knowledge and belief, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/S/ ROBERT TARINI                                  /S/ GINO M. PEREIRA
----------------------------                       ----------------------------
ROBERT TARINI                                      GINO M. PEREIRA
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

DATE:  FEBRUARY 18, 2005                           DATE:  FEBRUARY 18, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350
 
 (ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
 
 
 In connection with the annual report of Illinois Power Company (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Larry F. Altenbaumer, President of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 
 (1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.
 
 
 
 
 Date: March 12, 2004
/s/
Larry F. AltenbaumerLarry F. AltenbaumerPresident
 
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Illinois Power Company and will be retained by Illinois Power Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §693a. Rules and regulations for administration of Ouachita National Forest; violations; penalties

The Secretary of Agriculture shall execute the provisions of this section and section 693 of this title, and he is authorized to prescribe all general rules and regulations for the administration of such game sanctuaries and refuges, and violation of such rules and regulations shall be punished by fine of not more than $500 or imprisonment for not more than six months or both.

(June 13, 1933, ch. 63, §2, 48 Stat. 128.)
### §541a. Administration, protection, development, and regulation of use

The administration, protection, development, and regulation of use of the Area shall be by the Secretary of Agriculture (hereinafter referred to as the "Secretary") in accordance with the laws, rules, and regulations applicable to national forests, in such manner as in his judgment will best contribute to attainment of the purpose of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 93–535, §2, Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1732.)
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of The SCO Group, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q, for the three months ended January 31, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, DarlC. McBride, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 that:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/  Darl C. McBride                   |   |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | Darl  C. McBride                       |   |
|   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |                                   |   |
|   |                                   |   |
| Date:  | April  1, 2005                         |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         250,400
<SECURITIES>                                   738,517
<RECEIVABLES>                                       31
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,017,640
<PP&E>                                       7,501,588
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,992,387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,021,229
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          622,445
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,559
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,063,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,021,229
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,076,374
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  454,965
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               750,577
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             513,106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                357,726
<INCOME-TAX>                                   157,670
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            200,056
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   200,056
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .68


</TABLE>
# CA2007022EN.01000101.xml

| 31.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 22/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 22/1

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Image

---
#### § 245a.30 Description of program.

This Subpart C implements the Family Unity provisions of section 1504 of the LIFE Act Amendments, Public Law 106-554.
#### In re: Stella KASAI, aka Kyung Sook Kim, Debtor. Stella Kasai, aka Kyung Sook Kim, Appellant, v. Finance Factors, Ltd., Appellee.

No. 01-16753. BAP No. HI-00-01709-RRyH.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 8, 2002.*

Decided May 14, 2002.

*603Before CHOY, FERGUSON, and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Stella Kasai mortgaged her residence to Finance Factors Ltd. (“Finance Factors”). The property was sold to Finance Factors at a foreclosure sale after the Bankruptcy Court granted relief from the automatic stay and while Kasai’s appeal from the Bankruptcy Court’s ruling was pending before the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”). After the foreclosure, the BAP dismissed her appeal as moot, and Kasai appeals. We review the BAP’s decision de novo. *Contractors’ State License Bd. v. Dunbar (In re Dunbar),*245 F.3d 1058, 1061 (9th Cir.2001).

We affirm the BAP’s dismissal of Kasai’s appeal. In *Onouli-Kona Land Co. v. Estate of Richards (In re Onouli-Kona Land Co.),*846 F.2d 1170 (9th Cir.1988), under similar circumstances, we affirmed the district court’s dismissal of an appeal from a bankruptcy court’s order confirming a foreclosure as moot, even when the creditor was a party to the appeal, because the foreclosure sale was complete and Hawaii statutes do not create a right of redemption. *Id.*at 1173; *see Fed. Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Transamerica Ins. Co.,*89 Hawaii 157, 969 P.2d 1275, 1282 (1998) (Hawaii’s equitable right of redemption terminates on an order of foreclosure, and no statutory right exists).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Thomas F. Byrnes, Respondent, v. Frank J. Tyler and Another, Impleaded, etc., Appellants.

Motion denied, without costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ.
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 12005SP056

**Protocol concerning the conditions and arrangements for admission of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union - PART FIVE:PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PROTOCOL - TITLE II:APPLICABILITY OF THE ACTS OF THE INSTITUTIONS - Article 56***Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0044 - 0044*

Article 56

Where acts of the institutions adopted prior to accession require adaptation by reason of accession, and the necessary adaptations have not been provided for in this Protocol or its Annexes, the Council, acting on a proposal from the Commission, or the Commission, if the original act was adopted by the Commission, shall to this end adopt the necessary acts. Where these adaptations are adopted after accession they may be applied as from the date of accession.

--------------------------------------------------
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDWARD P. KAKALIA,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.
STATE OF HAWAII; DAVID Y. IGE, in his capacity of current Governor of The State of Hawaii,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 19

- 55571

D.C. No. 8:18

- cv

- 02149

- JLS

- DFM

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 2, 2020 * *

Before: LEAVY, SILVERMAN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Edward P. Kak a lia appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims arising out of the alleged
improper taking of land in Hawaii

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 55571

We review de novo the distric t court’s dismissal for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction

. Crum v. Circus Circus Enters. , 231 F.3d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir. 2000)

. We may affirm on any basis supported by the record

. Thompson v. Paul , 547 F.3d

1055, 1058

- 59 (9th Cir. 2008)

. We affirm.

Dismissal of Kakalia’s action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under

the local action doctrine was proper because Kakalia’s action concerned real
property in Hawaii over which the district court in the Central District of California

had no j urisdiction

. See Eldee

- K Rental Prop s. , LLC v. DIRECTV, Inc. , 748 F.3d

943, 946

- 47 (9th Cir. 2014) ( explaining that under the local action doctrine , district

courts generally have exclusive jurisdiction over actions to recover title or

possession of prope rty in the forum where that property is located )

. In light of our disposition
, we do not consider the parties’ remaining
arguments regarding Eleventh Amendment immunity, the statute of limitations,

and failure to state a claim

. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Kakalia leave to

amend because amendment would have been futile. See Gordon v. City of

Oakland , 627 F.3d 1092, 1094 (9th Cir. 2010) (setting forth standard of review and

explaining that leave to a mend may be denied if amendment would be futile).
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Kakalia’s motion
for default judgment

. See Eitel v. McCool , 782 F.2d 1470, 1471

- 72 (9th Cir. 1986)3 19

- 55571

(setting forth standard of review and factors f or determining whether to enter
default judgment).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued
in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

All pending motions and requests are deni ed.

AFFIRMED.
#### § 230.206 Monitoring supportive services.

Supportive services programs shall be continually monitored and evaluated by the State highway agency so that needed improvements can be identified and instituted. This requires the documentation of valid effectiveness measures by which the results of program efforts may be accurately assessed.
# Litigation Releases

The latest Litigation Releases from the Securities and Exchange Commission

- Lixin Azarmehr, JL Real Estate Development Corporation, Nevada Skilled Nursing Lender, LLC, and Nevada Skilled Nursing Development Lixin Azarmehr, JL Real Estate Development Corporation, Nevada Skilled Nursing Lender, LLC, and Nevada Skilled Nursing Development
- Justin Robert King Justin Robert King
- Zachary J. Horwitz Zachary J. Horwitz
- Rosenberger et al. Rosenberger et al.
- Mark Borden Mark Borden
- Matthew Panuwat Matthew Panuwat
- Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft, et al. Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft, et al.
- Commonwealth Equity Services, LLC d/b/a Commonwealth Financial Network Commonwealth Equity Services, LLC d/b/a Commonwealth Financial Network
- Eduardo Hernandez et al. Eduardo Hernandez et al.
- ClearPath Wealth Management, LLC; Patrick Churchville ClearPath Wealth Management, LLC; Patrick Churchville
- Ronald Heineman Ronald Heineman
- Jason Nielsen Jason Nielsen
- GA Investors GA Investors
- Travis Treusch Travis Treusch
- FLiK et al. FLiK et al.
- Christopher E. Galvin Christopher E. Galvin
- Matthew Nicosia, William Reininger, Fabrizio Di Carlo, and Ronald Touchard Matthew Nicosia, William Reininger, Fabrizio Di Carlo, and Ronald Touchard
- Jonathan William Mikula, et al. Jonathan William Mikula, et al.
- William Shupe and Daniel Cattlin William Shupe and Daniel Cattlin
- Jordan Qsar, Grant Witherspoon, Austin Bernard, and Chase Lambert Jordan Qsar, Grant Witherspoon, Austin Bernard, and Chase Lambert
- Andreas Bechtolsheim Andreas Bechtolsheim
- Stephen Scott Burns Stephen Scott Burns
- Steven J. Jacobson and Advisor Resource Council Steven J. Jacobson and Advisor Resource Council
- Joseph Padilla, et al. Joseph Padilla, et al.
- Bernard Findley and Halitron, Inc. Bernard Findley and Halitron, Inc.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-4713

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOE D. MILLS, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior 

District Judge. (4:08-cr-00012-F-1)

Submitted: February 7, 2012 Decided: February 23, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon, 

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellant. Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney, Jennifer 

P. May-Parker, Kristine L. Fritz, Assistant United States 

Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Joe D. Mills, Jr. appeals the district court’s 

judgment imposing a thirty-six month sentence upon revocation of 

his probation. Mills does not dispute that he violated the 

terms of his probation, but instead challenges the procedural 

reasonableness of his sentence. We affirm.

We review sentences imposed upon revocation of 

probation to determine whether they are plainly unreasonable. 

United States v. Moulden, 478 F.3d 652, 655 (4th Cir. 2007). 

The first step in this review analyzes whether the sentence 

imposed is unreasonable at all, taking “a more deferential 

appellate posture concerning issues of fact and the exercise of 

discretion than reasonableness review for guidelines sentences.” 

Id. at 656 (internal quotation marks omitted). Although a 

sentencing court must consider the non-binding policy statements 

in Chapter 7 of the Guidelines as well as the applicable 18 

U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2006) factors, it “retains broad discretion to 

revoke a defendant’s probation and impose a term of imprisonment 

up to the statutory maximum.” Id. at 656-57. A sentencing 

court must provide a statement of reasons for the sentence 

imposed, but this statement need not be as specific as one 

addressing a departure from a “traditional” Guidelines range. 

Id. at 657. If the revocation sentence is unreasonable, we must 

then determine whether it is plainly so. Id.
3

We find that the district court adequately explained 

its reasons for imposing the thirty-six month revocation 

sentence. In rejecting Mills’ request for a shorter sentence 

followed by a term of supervised release conditioned on inpatient substance abuse treatment, the district court recounted 

Mills’ pattern of supervision violations and relapse into 

substance abuse following treatment. Thus, the district court 

deemed Mills no longer suitable for community supervision. We 

find the district court’s explanation sufficient in this case.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief
Financial Officer of HM Publishing Corp. and Houghton Mifflin Company (together, the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) | the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    STEPHEN
RICHARDSStephen Richards Executive Vice President, Chief OperatingOfficer, and Chief Financial Officer




Date: March 25, 2005



A signed original of this written statement,
required by Section 906, has been provided to HM Publishing Corp. and Houghton Mifflin Company and will be retained by HM Publishing Corp. and Houghton Mifflin Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.