alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Strontium sorption studies on crandallite

By: Irving MayMarian M. SchnepfeCharles R. Naeser

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1144C

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6153

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CLARENCE D. COAKLEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Terrence W. Boyle,

District Judge. (CR-96-26))

Submitted: July 25, 2005 Decided: August 19, 2005

Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence D. Coakley, Appellant Pro Se. Jane J. Jackson, Assistant

United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Clarence D. Coakley seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P.

60(b) challenging the denial of relief on Coakley’s earlier Rule 60

motion that the district court construed as a motion filed under 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final

order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000); see Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 368-69 (4th Cir. 2004)

(holding that order denying Rule 60(b) relief in habeas setting is

final order in habeas proceeding and is subject to certificate of

appealability requirement of § 2253(c)). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his

constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v.

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683

(4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and

conclude that Coakley has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny Coakley’s motion to vacate all orders

preventing him from filing a § 2255 motion, deny a certificate of
- 3 -

appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
(54 South. 935.)

No. 18,744.

#### STATE ex rel. FLEMING v. JOYCE, Registrar of Voters, et al.

(April 10, 1911.)

*(Syllabus by the Court.)*

Elections (§ 73*) — Residence or Voter — Temporary Absence.

Temporary absence, necessitated by the calling of a voter, does not operate a change of his political residence.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Elections, Cent. Dig. §§ 69, 70; Dec. Dig. § 73.*]

*441Appeal from Tenth Judicial District Court. Parish of Concordia; John S. Boatner, Judge.

Application by the State, on the relation of D. B. Fleming, for rule against John J. Joyce, Registrar of Voters, to erase the name of Charles E. Stingley from the rolls. From an order refusing the rule, relator appeals.

Affirmed.

John S. Boatner, Jr., for appellant. Calhoun & Calhoun, for appellee Stingley. John J. Joyce, pro se.

BAND, J.

This is a proceeding by rule to have the name of Charles E. Stingley erased from the registration rolls of the parish of Concordia, on the ground that he has not been an actual bona fide resident of the state, parish, and precinct for the time required by law. There was judgment for the defendant, and the relator has appealed. The issue is one of fact, and is narrowed down' to the question whether the defendant, a railroad man, is a resident of the town of Ferriday. On the evidence before us there can be no question that for three years prior to January 1, 1911, the defendant actually resided in Ferriday as much as his calling permitted. He had there a rented room, in which he slept every other night, and in which he kept his trunk and clothes. His payment of poll taxes showed his intent to fix his electoral residence in Ferriday. About January 1, 1911, the schedule of the train was changed, so that the defendant could no longer sleep in Ferriday. But he continued to keep his room and personal belongings in Ferriday, and recently spent three weeks there when he had a lay-off on account of sickness. The defendant’s enforced absence because of business reasons does not operate a change of residence. •

Judgment affirmed.
Editorial Note on Part 1003
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1003 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10350, Mar. 5, 2003.

§ 1003.61 General provisions. ( a ) *Definitions* — ( 1 ) *Director.* Director means the Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), pursuant to 8 CFR 1001.1(o), and shall also include any office or official within EOIR to whom the Director delegates authority with respect to subpart E of this part.
( 2 ) *Pro bono legal services.* Pro bono legal services are those uncompensated legal services performed for indigent individuals or the public good without any expectation of either direct or indirect remuneration, including referral fees (other than filing fees or photocopying and mailing expenses), although a representative may be regularly compensated by the firm, organization, or pro bono referral service with which he or she is associated.
( 3 ) *Organization.* A non-profit religious, charitable, social service, or similar group established in the United States.
( 4 ) *Pro bono referral service.* A referral service, offered by a non-profit group, association, or similar organization established in the United States that assists persons in locating pro bono representation by making case referrals to attorneys or organizations that are available to provide pro bono representation.
( 5 ) *Provider.* Any organization, pro bono referral service, or attorney whose name is included on the List of Pro Bono Legal Service Providers.
( b ) *Authority.* The Director shall maintain a list, known as the List of Pro Bono Legal Service Providers (List), of organizations, pro bono referral services, and attorneys qualified under this subpart to provide pro bono legal services in immigration proceedings. The List, which shall be updated not less than quarterly, shall be provided to individuals in removal and other proceedings before an immigration court.
( c ) *Qualification.* An organization, pro bono referral service, or attorney qualifies to be included on the List if the eligibility requirements under § 1003.62 and the application procedures under § 1003.63 are met.
( d ) *Organizations.* Approval of an organization's application to be included on the List under this subpart is not equivalent to recognition under part 1292 of this chapter. Recognition under part 1292 of this chapter does not constitute a successful application for purposes of the List.
[80 FR 59510, Oct. 1, 2015]
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Richmond Division

In re: Omega W. Wilson, Case No. 18-32653

Debtor. Chapter 13

ORDER

A hearing was held on July 3, 2018, pursuant to the Order Setting Hearing entered by the 

Court. The Debtor did not appear at the hearing. For the reasons stated on the record from the 

bench, it is 

ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED; and it is further

ORDERED that the debtor(s) pay the balance of the filing fee in the amount of $310.00

to the Clerk of Court within 14 days of the date of this order; and it is further

ORDERED that dismissal of this case revests the property of the estate in the entity in

which such property was vested immediately before the commencement of the case. The trustee

need not file a final report unless property or money was administered.

Date: July 10, 2018 /s/ Keith L. Phillips

United States Bankruptcy Judge

Copies to all creditors and parties in interest

Entered on Docket: July 10, 2018

Case 18-32653-KLP Doc 20 Filed 07/10/18 Entered 07/10/18 14:42:10 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
National Cancer Institute

u.s. Department 

of health and

human services National Institutes

of Health

Managing Chemotherapy Side Effects

Appetite 

Changes l Eat well to help your body 

stay strong. 

l Let your doctor or nurse 

know if you lose weight.

Try these tips to make 

eating easier:

Set meal times and routines.

Eat a little, even if you’re not hungry. l It may help to eat 5 or 6 small meals 

each day, instead of 3 large meals.

l Try new foods to keep up your 

interest in food. 

l Eat with family or friends, or watch 

television while you eat.

l Choose healthy foods, like those 

listed on the back of this sheet. 

l Ask your doctor or nurse about 

seasonings that may help some 

foods taste better.

l If food tastes like metal, eat with 

plastic forks or spoons. 

Be active.

Being active may help you feel 

more hungry. l Take a short walk each day. l Talk with your doctor or nurse 

about exercise that can help you.

Drink liquids.

Getting enough to drink is important, 

but don’t fill up on liquids during meals. l Drink milkshakes or soups that are 

easy to swallow.

l Keep track of how much you eat and 

drink each day. Then talk with your 

doctor or nurse to make sure you are 

eating and drinking enough.

“Many days I’m just not hungry. 

I find it easier to eat small meals. 

My nurse told me about foods that 

can help me keep up my strength.”

What are appetite 

changes?

Two common changes during 

chemotherapy are feeling less hungry 

and finding that some foods may 

taste different. 
Managing Chemotherapy Side Effects: Appetite Changes

Questions to ask your doctor or nurse:

1. What problems should I call you about?

2. What foods should I eat?

3. Are there high-protein drinks or vitamins that can help me?

4. How much water, or other liquids, should I drink each day?

5. What exercise can help me? 

Keep this list on your refrigerator.

Eat more of these foods and drinks that are high in calories or protein. 

Soups Drinks Main meals 

and snacks

Sweets Extras

•	Cream soups

•	Soups with

lentils or beans 

(such as black, 

kidney, pinto, 

or red)

•	Some instant

breakfast drinks

•	Milkshakes

•	Fruit smoothies

•	Whole milk

•	Chicken

•	Lentils or beans

(such as black, 

kidney, pinto, 

or red)

•	Eggs

•	Fish

•	Nuts, seeds, and

wheat germ

•	Custard

•	Ice cream

•	Muffins

•	Pudding

•	Yogurt (plain

or vanilla)

•	Butter, margarine,

or oil added to 

foods

•	Cottage cheese,

cream cheese, and 

sour cream

•	Some liquid meal

replacements

•	Peanut butter

•	Powdered milk

added to foods

Ask your doctor or nurse what foods and drinks are best for you.

NIH Publication No. 11-6466

Revised December 2010

How can we help?

National Cancer Institute’s Cancer Information Service

Phone: 1-800-422-6237 (1-800-4-CANCER)

Web: www.cancer.gov

Online Chat: www.cancer.gov/livehelp

NCI has a series of 18 Chemotherapy Side Effects Fact Sheets at:

www.cancer.gov/chemo-side-effects
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 91737 / April 30, 2021

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-19793

In the Matter of

Morgan Stanley Smith Barney 

LLC,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

SECOND EXTENSION ORDER

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested an extension of time until July 

30, 2021 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution under Rule 1101(a) of the Commission’s 

Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(a).

On May 12, 2020, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Administrative and Ceaseand-Desist Proceedings, Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 

Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Making Findings, and 

Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order (the “Order”)1 against Morgan 

Stanley Smith Barney LLC (the “Respondent”). The Commission ordered the Respondent to pay 

a $5,000,000 civil money penalty to the Commission. The Commission also created a Fair Fund, 

pursuant to Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, so the penalty paid can be 

distributed to harmed investors (the “Fair Fund”).

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 88856 (May 12, 2020).
The Fair Fund consists of the $5,000,000 in civil money penalties paid by the 

Respondent.

On July 23, 2020, the Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority, issued an order 

extending the Division’s time until April 30, 2021 to submit a proposed plan of distribution.2 

The Division now believes an additional three months of time is needed. In its request for an 

extension of time, the Division states that additional time is needed to complete the fund 

administrator appointment process, develop the distribution methodology, and develop the plan 

of distribution.

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s 

request for an extension of time until July 30, 2021 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution is 

granted. 

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.3

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

2

 Extension Order, Exchange Act Rel. No. 89383 (July 23, 2020).

3

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(i).
MEMORANDUM 

June 25, 2009 

To: S. Lutz 

Via: K. Kunaniec 

From: T. Underwood 

Re: Outside Test NTV-644; May 6 and 7, 2009 source test of A-3 

Site No: A5474 

Plant No: 5474; US Mint 

Source No: S-8, S-9; Chrome plating tanks 

Abated by: A-2, A-3; Scrubber, HEPA 

A/C No: 19110, 4701, 20086 

Cond. No. 16712; Cr+6 0.006 mg/A-hr, after 10/24/09 0.0015 mg/A-hr; 

By: Avogadro Group 

I have reviewed the source test report cited above and note the following: 

1) Source Test was properly notified (NST-1657). 

2) I did not witness the test. 

3) The testing appears to have been conducted by personnel who are familiar with 

proper source testing techniques. 

4) Quality assurance procedures were adequate to assure data integrity. 

5) Results of the referenced testing are that quantified emissions were in 

compliance with the emission limits cited above. 

This source was in compliance with District Regulations. 
United States Mint June 12, 2009 

2009 Source Test Report 

09117.0c 12 

TABLE 5-1 

RESULTS SUMMARY 

US MINT, SAN FRANCISCO 

CHROME PLATING TANKS 1-2 SCRUBBER EXHAUST STACK 

Test No.: 1-Cr 2-Cr 3-Cr Average 

Date: 05/06/2009 05/07/2009 05/07/2009 -- 

Time: 1310-1611 0910-1211 1237-1538 -- 

Operating Conditions: 

Ampere-hours/test 1,775 2,111 1,997 1,961 

Ampere-hours/hour 591.7 703.7 665.7 653.7 

Flue Gas: 

Sample volume, dscf 108.24 105.60 105.60 106.48 

O2, % volume dry 20.95 20.95 20.95 20.95 

CO2, % volume dry 0.066 0.050 0.074 0.063 

Stack gas temperature F 77.8 77.1 77.0 77.3 

Moisture content, % vol. 1.83 1.76 1.69 1.76 

Stack flow rate, dscfm 2,434 2,408 2,419 2,420 

Total Chromium: 

μg/dscm 0.652 0.568 1.003 0.741 

lb/hr 5.94E-06 5.12E-06 9.08E-06 6.72E-06 

mg/amp-hr 0.0046 0.0033 0.0062 0.0047 

Hexavalent Chromium: 

μg/dscm 0.140 0.156 0.151 0.149 

lb/hr 1.27E-06 1.40E-06 1.36E-06 1.35E-06 

mg/amp-hr 0.0010 0.0009 0.0009 0.0009 

 

NTV-644
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                               2
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,578
<ALLOWANCES>                                       352
<INVENTORY>                                      3,333
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,988
<PP&E>                                           2,005
<DEPRECIATION>                                     986
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,582
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,777
<BONDS>                                          3,327
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         19
<COMMON>                                            32
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,427
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,582
<SALES>                                          5,151
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,253
<CGS>                                            4,178
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,178
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    13
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (2)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 45
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        45
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 1270
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1270 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10359, Mar. 5, 2003.

§ 1270.3 Penalties. ( a ) *Criminal penalties.* Nothing in section 274C of the Act shall be construed to diminish or qualify any of the penalties available for activities prohibited by this section but proscribed as well in title 18, United States Code.
( b ) *Civil penalties.* A person or entity may face civil penalties for a violation of section 274C of the Act. Civil penalties may be imposed by the Service or by an administrative law judge for violations under section 274C of the Act. The Service may charge multiple violations of section 274C of the Act in a single Notice of Intent to Fine, and may impose separate penalties for each such unlawful act in a single proceeding or determination. However, in determining whether an offense is a first offense or a subsequent offense, a finding of more than one violation in the course of a single proceeding or determination will be counted as a single offense. ( 1 ) A respondent found by the Service or an administrative law judge to have violated section 274C of the Act shall be subject to an order: ( i ) To cease and desist from such behavior; and
( ii ) To pay a civil penalty as follows: ( A ) *First offense.* Not less than $250 and not exceeding $2,000 for each fraudulent document or each proscribed activity described in section 274C(a)(1) through (a)(4) of the Act before September 29, 1999, and not less than $275 and not exceeding $2,200, for each fraudulent document or each proscribed activity on or after September 29, 1999.
( B ) *Subsequent offenses.* Not less than $2,000 and not more than $5,000 for each fraudulent document or each proscribed activity described in section 274C(a)(1) through (a)(4) of the Act before September 29, 1999, and not less than $2,200 and not exceeding $5,500, for each fraudulent document or each proscribed activity occurring on or after September 29, 1999.
( 2 ) Where an order is issued to a respondent composed of distinct, physically separate subdivisions each of which provides separately for the hiring, recruiting, or referring for a fee for employment (without reference to the practices of, and not under the common control of or common control with, another subdivision), each subdivision shall be considered a separate person or entity.
[57 FR 33866, July 31, 1992, as amended at 64 FR 47101, Aug. 30, 1999]
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Frederick Massolles and Katherina Massolles, Appellants, v. Joseph P. Hennessy and Others, Composing the Board of Assessors of the City of New York, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, as matter of law, and not in the exercise of discretion. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4943 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to provide 

that children who have relocated from Puerto Rico to the States are 

fully considered for purposes of State allotments under the English 

Language Acquisition grants. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 31, 2019 

Mrs. MURPHY of Florida (for herself and Mr. DIAZ-BALART) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 to provide that children who have relocated 

from Puerto Rico to the States are fully considered for 

purposes of State allotments under the English Language Acquisition grants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Linguistic 

5 Excellence and Vocational Aptitude by Teaching English 

6 Act’’ or the ‘‘ELEVATE Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4943 IH

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF PUERTO RICO WITH RESPECT TO 

2 ALLOTMENTS FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE AC3 QUISITION GRANTS. 

4 (a) TREATMENT OF MIGRANTS FROM PUERTO

5 RICO.—Section 3201(5) of the Elementary and Secondary 

6 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7011(5)) is amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘in which 

8 the primary language of instruction in public ele9 mentary schools and secondary schools is English’’ 

10 after ‘‘any State’’; and 

11 (2) in subparagraph (C), by inserting ‘‘, other 

12 than Puerto Rico,’’ after ‘‘States’’. 

13 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by sub14 section (a)— 

15 (1) may only apply to fiscal years 2020 and 

16 2021 if the Secretary of Education determines that 

17 the application of such amendments will not result 

18 in a State receiving an allotment under title III of 

19 the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 

20 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6801 et seq.) for such fiscal year 

21 that is less than the allotment such State received 

22 under such title in fiscal year 2019; and 

23 (2) shall apply beginning on and after October 

24 1, 2021. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS