alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM HAWAIIAN
ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES' CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000046207
<NAME> HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,893,105
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         168,597
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        13,085
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 137,527
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,212,314
<COMMON>                                        85,387
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      296,266
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            387,582
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 769,235
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           83,175
<PREFERRED>                                     48,293
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           597,621
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                 400
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  95,181
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   30,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                        2,595
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 585,814
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,212,314
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,098,755
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            52,795
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     934,920
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     987,715
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        111,040
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              19,042
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 130,082
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        48,233
<NET-INCOME>                                    81,849
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      3,660
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   78,189
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        58,377
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       42,317
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         138,907
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        
<FN> 
<F1> REPRESENTS EPS-BASIC
</FN>

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17120-17121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7149]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Supplemental Notice Requesting Comments

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Docket Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority Rights to New Participant-Funded   AD11-11-000
 Transmission.
Alta Wind I, LLC..........................  EL10-62-000
Alta Wind II, LLC.........................
Alta Wind III, LLC........................
Alta Wind IV, LLC.........................
Alta Wind V, LLC..........................
Alta Wind VI, LLC.........................
Alta Wind VII, LLC........................
Alta Wind VIII, LLC.......................
Alta Windpower Development, LLC...........
TGP Development Company, LLC..............
Puget Sound Energy, Inc...................  EL10-72-001
Terra-Gen Dixie Valley, LLC, TGP Dixie      EL10-29-002
 Development Company, LLC, and New York
 Canyon, LLC.
Green Borders Geothermal, LLC v. Terra-Gen  EL10-36-002
 Dixie Valley, LLC.
Terra-Gen Dixie Valley, LLC...............  ER11-2127-001
Northern Pass Transmission, LLC...........  ER11-2377-000
Cedar Creek Wind Energy, LLC..............  RC11-1-000
Milford Wind Corridor Phase I, LLC........  RC11-2-000
SunZia Transmission, LLC..................  EL11-24-000
Hudson Transmission Partners, LLC.........  ER11-3017-000
Peetz Logan Interconnect, LLC.............  ER11-2970-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 17121]]

    On March 15, 2011, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission staff 
(Staff) held a technical conference to obtain further information to 
aid the Commission in considering issues related to the ownership of 
and priority access rights to new participant-funded transmission 
projects.
    In particular, Staff sought to explore issues related to priority 
rights to use transmission infrastructure developed under various new 
business models in two specific contexts: independent and/or merchant 
transmission, and generator lead lines. In both contexts, participants 
were encouraged to identify and discuss the appropriate balance between 
the Commission's requirements for open access and the needs of project 
developers. Participants were also encouraged to propose and discuss 
specific regulatory alternatives that are consistent with the 
Commission's open access policies and its statutory responsibility to 
ensure that rates, terms, and conditions of service are just and 
reasonable and not unduly discriminatory or preferential.
    Persons wishing to comment on these issues should submit written 
comments to the Commission no later than April 21, 2011.

    Dated: March 18, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-7149 Filed 3-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
1 

# Moving To Multi-pollutant Sector-based ApproachesProposed Work Group CharterKeith MasonElineth TorresLisa ConnerOctober 5, 2010Disclaimer: Positions or views expressed here do notrepresent official EPA policy or guidanceCharter for the Work GroupThe following charter is an initial proposal for discussion todetermine topics and level of coverage to pursueGeneral issues•How can EPA incentivize bettercoordination among stationarysource programs and what are the benefits and challenges ofincreased coordination?•What are the regulatory and legal challenges to implementingsector-based, multi-pollutant approaches?•How should the coordinationof regulatory timelines andrequirements begin within a sector?•Which advanced technologies willassist in controlling multipletypes of air pollution?Disclaimer: Positions or views expressed here do notrepresent official EPA policy or guidanceCharter for the Work GroupGeneral issues cont.•What are the co-benefit, energy, andresearch implications ofthese technologies?•What are the market-based mechanisms that EPA should beinvestigating for sector-based approaches that would help thesector to be more efficient?•How can EPA better incentivize facilities to replace outdated orpoorly performing equipment and improve energy efficiency whilereducing malfunctions? How does a sector-based or multipollutant approach help?•Are there financing and investmentprograms that can be utilizedto help implement sector-based approaches and specifictechnologies?Disclaimer: Positions or views expressed here do notrepresent official EPA policy or guidanceCharter for the Work GroupSpecific Issues•Explore the challenges of reforming air pollution source categorydefinitions from unit-by-unitto facility-wide definitions.•Explore the challenges of developing emission standards for airtoxics (NESHAPs) and criteria air pollutant programs (NSPS) basedon a common set of regulated air pollutants.•Explore the challenges of coordinating the periodic revision of theNAAQS with the required updates of NESHAPS and NSPSstandards.•Explore the challenges of utilizing work practice standards insituations where quantifiable emission limitations and reductions areneeded.Disclaimer: Positions or views expressed here do notrepresent official EPA policy or guidanceQuestions and DiscussionThank YouContact InformationKeith MasonMason.Keith@epa.gov202-564-1678Elineth TorresTorres.elineth@epa.gov919-541-4347
Case 18-71702-FJS Doc 44 Filed 03/22/19 Entered 03/22/19 14:53:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 18-71702-FJS Doc 44 Filed 03/22/19 Entered 03/22/19 14:53:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 18-71702-FJS Doc 44 Filed 03/22/19 Entered 03/22/19 14:53:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 18-71702-FJS Doc 44 Filed 03/22/19 Entered 03/22/19 14:53:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 18-71702-FJS Doc 44 Filed 03/22/19 Entered 03/22/19 14:53:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 18-71702-FJS Doc 44 Filed 03/22/19 Entered 03/22/19 14:53:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 18-71702-FJS Doc 44 Filed 03/22/19 Entered 03/22/19 14:53:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 18-71702-FJS Doc 44 Filed 03/22/19 Entered 03/22/19 14:53:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 18-71702-FJS Doc 44 Filed 03/22/19 Entered 03/22/19 14:53:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 18-71702-FJS Doc 44 Filed 03/22/19 Entered 03/22/19 14:53:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
# C_2023127EN.01002302.xml

| 11.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/23

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 6 February 2023 — Skatteverket v Digital Charging Solutions GmbH

(Case C-60/23, Digital Charging Solutions)

(2023/C 127/29)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Skatteverket

Respondent: Digital Charging Solutions GmbH

Questions referred

| 1. | Does a supply to the user of an electric vehicle consisting of the charging of the vehicle at a charging point constitute a supply of goods under Articles 14(1) and 15(1) of the VAT Directive? (1) |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does a supply to the user of an electric vehicle consisting of the charging of the vehicle at a charging point constitute a supply of goods under Articles 14(1) and 15(1) of the VAT Directive? (1)

| 2. | If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative, is such a supply then to be deemed to be present at all stages of a chain of transactions which include an intermediary company, where the chain of transactions is accompanied by a contract at every stage, but only the user of the vehicle has the right to decide on matters such as quantity, time of purchase and charging location, as well as how the electricity is to be used? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative, is such a supply then to be deemed to be present at all stages of a chain of transactions which include an intermediary company, where the chain of transactions is accompanied by a contract at every stage, but only the user of the vehicle has the right to decide on matters such as quantity, time of purchase and charging location, as well as how the electricity is to be used?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

---
# Official Journal C 94/21 A

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 94 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4921 April 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 94

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4921 April 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2006/C 094/1 | Special report No 6/2005 on the trans-European network for transport (TEN-T) together with the Commission's replies | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Court of Auditors

2006/C 094/1

Special report No 6/2005 on the trans-European network for transport (TEN-T) together with the Commission's replies

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), the undersigned, Robert Thistle, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of Micro Laboratories, Inc., (the "Company"),
does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Annual Report Form 10QSB for three months ended June 30, 2005 of
the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1034, and the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:       August 21, 2005

By /s/Robert Thistle
   ----------------------
Robert Thistle
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
#### § 280.3 Departure of vessel or aircraft prior to denial of clearance.

If any vessel or aircraft which is subject to the imposition of a fine shall have departed from the United States prior to the denial of clearance by the district director of customs and such vessel or aircraft is subsequently found in the United States, a Notice of Intention to Fine, Form I-79, shall be served as provided in this part, if such form has not been previously served for the same violation. Clearance of such vessel or aircraft shall be withheld by the district director of customs, and the procedure prescribed in this part shall be followed to the same extent and in the same manner as though the vessel or aircraft had not departed from the United States. Aircraft subject to the provisions of § 280.2, which shall have departed from the United States prior to the time of seizure could be effected, shall be subject to all of the provisions of this part, if subsequently found in the United States, to the same extent as though it had not departed from the United States.

[22 FR 9807, Dec. 6, 1957, as amended at 32 FR 17651, Dec. 12, 1967]
(No. 78-CC-1605

#### Willie Ladd, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed November 20, 1978.*

Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.*__, this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

*832It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Paul DYKE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-4002.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 7, 2002.

Decided May 21, 2002.

Carolyn Virginia Grady, Epperly, Follis & Schork, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant'. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, John S. Davis, Assistant United States Attorney, Peter B. Baruch, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

John Paul Dyke appeals his 108-month sentence imposed after a guilty plea to wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (1994) and money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1957 (1994). We find the district court properly sentenced Dyke and affirm.

*932Dyke contends the district court erred in imposing a two-level enhancement pursuant to *United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual*§ 2F1.1(b)(7) (1998) based on its finding that his fraudulent conduct involved the reckless risk of serious bodily injury and in imposing a four-level enhancement under §§ 3A1.1(b)(1) and (b)(2) for an offense involving a large number of unusually vulnerable victims. We review the district court’s factual determinations for clear error. *See United States v. Turner,*102 F.3d 1350, 1357-58 (4th Cir.1996). Given the circumstances of Dyke’s offense,, we find the district court did not clearly err in applying the enhancements. *See United States v. Singh,*54 F.3d 1182, 1191 (4th Cir.1995).

Dyke also challenges the district court’s seven-level upward departure for non-monetary loss and extreme conduct. We find the district court did not error in departing upward seven levels. *See United States v. Bonetti,*277 F.3d 441, 449 (4th Cir.2002); *United States v. Rybicki,*96 F.3d 754, 757 (4th Cir.1996).

Accordingly, we affirm Dyke’s 108 month sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
----

COUNCIL DECISION 2005/.../JHA

of

amending Decision 2003/170/JHA on the common use of liaison officers posted abroad by the law enforcement agencies of the Member States

(2005/C 188/12)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 30(1)(a), (b) and (c), Article 30(2)(c) and Article 34(2)(c) thereof,

Having regard to the initiative of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (1),

Having regard to the Opinion of the European Parliament (2),

Whereas:

Following the evaluation of the implementation of Council Decision 2003/170/JHA (3), certain provisions of that Decision should be amended to take account of current practice relating to the use by the Member States of Europol liaison officers posted abroad in order to channel information in accordance with the Europol Convention (4), and relating to the initiative for holding liaison officers meetings,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Amendment of Council Decision 2003/170/JHA

Council Decision 2003/170/JHA is hereby amended as follows:

Article 2

Application to Gibraltar

This Decision shall apply to Gibraltar.

Article 3

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force 14 days after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at ...

For the Council

The President

...

----

(1)  OJ ...

(2)  OJ ...

(3)OJ L 67, 12.3.2003, p. 27.

(4)OJ C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 1.

----
- Newsroom        - Press Releases
      - Public Statements
      - Speeches
      - Testimony
      - Spotlight Topics
      - Media Gallery
      - Upcoming Events
      - Webcasts
      - What's New
      - SEC Videos
      - Reports and Publications
      - RSS Feeds
      - Social Media 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

**TIME AND DATE:** Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, October 28, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.

**PLACE:** The meeting will be webcast on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov.

**STATUS:** This meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public via audio webcast only on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov.

**MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:** The Commission will consider whether to adopt rules and related amendments designed to provide an updated and more comprehensive approach to the regulation of funds' use of derivatives and other transactions while enhancing investor protections. The amendments the Commission will consider also would include new reporting requirements to enhance the Commission's ability to effectively oversee funds' use of derivatives. The Commission also will consider whether to rescind existing guidance and exemptive relief addressing derivatives and other transactions that would be covered by this new regulatory framework.

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:** For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman, Office of the Secretary, at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: October 21, 2020

Vanessa A. CountrymanSecretary
<PAGE>
                                                  Exhibit 21






     HARMON INDUSTRIES INC.
     FILE #0-7916
     DECEMBER 31, 1996
     LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES



                                 Names Under Which
Subsidiary Name                  Business is Conducted Jurisdiction
---------------                  ----------------------------------

Harmon Electronics, Inc.**       Same                  Missouri

Electro Pneumatic Corporation**  Same                  California

Consolidated Asset
Management Company, Inc.**       CAMCO                 Missouri

Cedrite Technologies, Inc.       Same                  Kansas

Harmon Railway Systems           Same                  Virgin Islands
International Corporation

Vaughan Harmon Systems Ltd.      Same                  Ware, England


**Effective 1/1/97 these companies were merged into Harmon Industries, Inc.

                                     73
### Geology of the Red Devil quicksilver mine, Alaska

By: E.M. MacKevett Jr.Henry C. Berg

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1142G

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.