alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 292.6 Interpretation.

Interpretations of this part will be made by the Board of Immigration Appeals, subject to the provisions of 8 CFR part 1003.

[32 FR 9633, July 4, 1967, as amended at 75 FR 5230, Feb. 2, 2010]
Order entered March 31, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00685-CV

ASSOCIATED AIR CENTER LP, ET AL, Appellants

V.

TARY NETWORK, LTD, ET AL, Appellees

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10-01620

ORDER

We GRANT appellees’ March 28, 2014 unopposed motion for additional extension of 

time to file brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than April 28, 2014. No further 

extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
Editorial Note on Part 1103
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1103 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10351, Mar. 5, 2003.

§ 1103.4 Certifications. ( a ) *Certification of other than special agricultural worker and legalization cases* — ( 1 ) *General.* The Commissioner or the Commissioner's delegate may direct that any case or class of cases be certified to another Service official for decision. In addition, regional commissioners, regional service center directors, district directors, officers in charge in districts 33 (Bangkok, Thailand), 35 (Mexico City, Mexico), and 37 (Rome, Italy), and the Director, National Fines Office, may certify their decisions to the appropriate appellate authority (as designated in this chapter) when the case involves an unusually complex or novel issue of law or fact.
( 2 ) *Notice to affected party.* When a case is certified to a Service officer, the official certifying the case shall notify the affected party using a Notice of Certification (Form I-290C). The affected party may submit a brief to the officer to whom the case is certified within 30 days after service of the notice. If the affected party does not wish to submit a brief, the affected party may waive the 30-day period.
( 3 ) *Favorable action.* The Service officer to whom a case is certified may suspend the 30-day period for submission of a brief if that officer takes action favorable to the affected party.
( 4 ) *Initial decision.* A case within the appellate jurisdiction of the Associate Commissioner, Examinations, or for which there is no appeal procedure may be certified only after an initial decision is made.
( 5 ) *Certification to AAU.* A case described in paragraph (a)(4) of this section may be certified to the AAU.
( 6 ) *Appeal to Board.* In a case within the Board's appellate jurisdiction, an unfavorable decision of the Service official to whom the case is certified (whether made initially or upon review) is the decision which may be appealed to the Board under § 1003.1(b) of this chapter.
( 7 ) *Other applicable provisions.* The provisions of § 1103.3(a)(2)(x) of this part also apply to decisions on certified cases. The provisions of § 1103.3(b) of this part also apply to requests for oral argument regarding certified cases considered by the AAU.
( b ) *Certification of denials of special agricultural worker and legalization applications.* The Regional Processing Facility director or the district director may, in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, certify a decision to the Associate Commissioner, Examinations (Administrative Appeals Unit) (the appellate authority designated in § 103.1(f)(2)) of this part, when the case involves an unusually complex or novel question of law or fact.
[52 FR 661, Jan. 8, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 43985, Oct. 31, 1988; 55 FR 20770, May 21, 1990]
Exhibit 23.     Consent of Experts and Counsel


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




To The Board Of Directors and Stockholders
of Helix Technology Corporation:


         We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  registration
statement of Helix Technology  Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 2-83974) of our
reports  dated  January 21, 2000,  on our audits of the  consolidated  financial
statements and financial  statement schedule of Helix Technology  Corporation as
of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and for the years ended  December 31, 1999,  1998
and 1997, which reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
-----------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 17, 2000
§ 91.60 Grantee's responsibilities. *Specific duties.* As part of its role in the NEPA process, the grantee agency must: ( a ) Work closely with OJP on the development and review of the environmental documents, and follow the NEPA process, with the full participation of OJP.
( b ) Issue the documents for public comment jointly with OJP.
( c ) Solicit comment from other state and federal agencies, interested organizations, and the public.
( d ) Refrain from purchasing land, beginning bidding process, or starting construction on any project until all environmental work has been completed.
( e ) Complete a project Status Report form for all projects under construction or completed prior to the effective date of this subpart.
( f ) Ensure that appropriate environmental analysis, as determined by OJP, is completed for all projects and that appropriate alternatives are considered and mitigation measures are implemented to reduce the impact of identified environmental impacts, if any.
( g ) Identify and inform OJP of all applicable state and local environmental impact review requirements.
( h ) Notify all subgrantees of the requirements of this subpart in the initial planning and site selection phase.
Exhibit32(b)

 

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Idaho Power Company (the "Company") on Form 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Jan B.Packwood, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Darrel T. Anderson,Senior Vice President - Administrative Services and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify that:

 

(1)              The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| */s/Jan B. Packwood*    |   | */s/Darrel T. Anderson*                          |
|-------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
| Jan B. Packwood         |   | Darrel T. Anderson                               |
| Chief Executive Officer |   | Senior Vice President -  Administrative Services |
| March 9, 2005           |   | and Chief Financial Officer                      |
|                    |   | March 9, 2005                                    |
ACCESS NUMBER: 30660-19913 

STUDY TITLE: A Socioeconomic Baseline Study for the Gulf of Mexico – Phase I 

REPORT TITLE: Socioeconomic Baseline Study for the Gulf of Mexico; Final Report: 

Description of the Dataset, 1930-1990 

CONTRACT NUMBER: 14-35-0001-30660-19913 

SPONSORING OCS REGION: Gulf of Mexico OCS Region 

APPLICABLE PLANNING AREA: Gulf of Mexico 

FISCAL YEARS OF PROJECT FUNDING: 1993 – 2002 

COMPLETION DATE OF REPORT: September 2002 

COSTS: FY 1993: $204,893: CUMULATIVE PROJECT COST: $204,893 

PROJECT MANAGER: Joachim Singelmann 

AFFILIATION: Louisiana State University 

ADDRESS: Departments of Sociology & Rural Sociology, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803 

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Natsumi Aratame 

KEY WORDS: Database, social and economic trends, fiscal impacts, oil and gas 

industry, Gulf of Mexico States 

BACKGROUND: This study involves a time-series collection of data to identify 

counties/parishes across the five Gulf of Mexico states that have been directly impacted 

by offshore activities. Changes in impacts over the period of 1930-1990 are also being 

examined. The study provides a database for indicators of socioeconomic impact of 

offshore activities focusing on the broad areas of demographic, economic, public 

services, and fiscal impacts. 

OBJECTIVES: This study provides MMS with a database of long-term social and 

economic trends for all counties and parishes across the five Gulf of Mexico states and 

(2) provides measures of affected and non-affected counties and parishes. It is 

intended to support future research by MMS and others on the consequences of oil and 

gas development in the Gulf of Mexico Region. 

DESCRIPTION: This database contains over 3,000 variables that include information 

about population, employment, income, establishments, and government finance for 

counties (or parishes) in Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas for the 

period 1930-1990. The data assembled include extracts from machine readable 

datasets as well as data entered manually. Information on oil/gas dependency is also 
ACCESS NUMBER: 30660-19913 

added based on an industry-occupation matrix specially obtained from the U.S. Bureau 

of the Census. 

SIGNIFICANT CONCLUSIONS: This publication contains only raw data and a 

description of the data, therefore there are no conclusions. 

STUDY RESULTS: This publication contains only raw data and a description of the 

data, therefore there are no results. 

STUDY PRODUCTS: Aratame, N. and J. Singelmann. 2002. Socioeconomic Baseline 

Study for the Gulf of Mexico. Final Report: A Description of the Dataset, 1930-1990. 

U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, 

New Orleans, LA. OCS Study MMS 2002-054. 157 pp. 

*P.I.’s affiliation may be different than that listed for Project Manager(s).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                           5,139
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  439,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,649
<INVENTORY>                                    391,021
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               941,826
<PP&E>                                         498,753
<DEPRECIATION>                                 212,879
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,269,173
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          516,858
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,243
<OTHER-SE>                                     631,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,269,173
<SALES>                                      1,726,523
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,726,523
<CGS>                                          962,518
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  574,889
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              63,898
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                125,218
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            125,218
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   125,218
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
### §715d. Purchase or rental of approved areas or interests therein; gifts and devises; United States lands

The Secretary of the Interior may—

(1) purchase or rent such areas or interests therein as have been approved for purchase or rental by the Commission at the price or prices fixed by the Commission; and

(2) acquire, by gift or devise, any area or interests therein;

which he determines to be suitable for use as an inviolate sanctuary, or for any other management purpose, for migratory birds. The Secretary may pay, when deemed necessary by him and from moneys authorized to be appropriated for the purposes of this subchapter (A) the purchase or rental price of any such area or interest therein, and (B) the expenses incident to the location, examination, survey, and acquisition of title (including options) of any such area or interest therein. No lands acquired, held, or used by the United States for military purposes shall be subject to any provisions of this subchapter.

(Feb. 18, 1929, ch. 257, §5, 45 Stat. 1223; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. II, §4(f), eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2731, 53 Stat. 1433; Pub. L. 95–616, §5(a), Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3113.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–616 incorporated existing provisions in pars. (1) and (2) and cls. (A) and (B), made provisions applicable to interests in approved areas, and inserted authority for purchase or acquisition for other management purposes.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Transfer of functions of Secretary of Agriculture to Secretary of the Interior by Reorg. Plan No. II of 1939, see Transfer of Functions note set out under section 715a of this title.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 21(a)

Subsidiaries of Illinois Power Company

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     State or Jurisdiction
Name                                                    of Incorporation
----                                                 ---------------------
<S>                                                  <C>
  Illinois Power Company                             Illinois
    IP Gas Supply Company                            Illinois
    Illinois Power Fuel Company (1)                  Illinois
    Illinois Power Capital, L.P. (2)                 Delaware
    Illinois Power Financing I                       Delaware
    Illinois Power Securitization Limited
      Liability company (3)                          Delaware
    Illinois Power Special Purpose Trust (4)         Delaware
</TABLE>

(1)      Illinois Power Company owned 50% of the common stock of Illinois Power
         Fuel Company. The Fuel Company was dissolved on February 23, 2000.

(2)      Illinois Power Company is the general partner in Illinois Power
         Capital, L.P., with a 3% equity ownership share. Illinois Power Capital
         is consolidated in the accounts of Illinois Power Company.

(3)      Illinois Power Company is the sole member of Illinois Power
         Securitization Limited Liability Company.

(4)      Illinois Power Securitization Limited Liability Company is the sole
         owner of the Illinois Power Special Purpose Trust.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 27, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00642

- CR

Ervin JACKSON,

Appellant

v.

The State of TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR0869

Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Kay Gittinger ’ s notification of late record is hereby granted. The reporter’s record is due

on or before January 13, 2017.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of December, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
§ 752.5 Safety rest areas. ( a ) Safety rest areas should provide facilities reasonably necessary for the comfort, convenience, relaxation, and information needs of the motorist. Caretakers' quarters may be provided in conjunction with a safety rest area at such locations where accommodations are deemed necessary. All facilities within the rest area are to provide full consideration and accommodation for the handicapped.
( b ) The State may permit the placement of vending machines in existing or new safety rest areas located on the rights-of-way of the Interstate system for the purpose of dispensing such food, drink, or other articles as the State determines are appropriate and desirable, except that the dispensing by any means, of petroleum products or motor vehicle replacement parts shall not be allowed. Such vending machines shall be operated by the State.
( c ) The State may operate the vending machines directly or may contract with a vendor for the installation, operation, and maintenance of the vending machines. In permitting the placement of vending machines the State shall give priority to vending machines which are operated through the State licensing agency designated pursuant to section 2(a)(5) of the Randolph-Sheppard Act, U.S.C. 107(a)(5).
( d ) Access from the safety rest areas to adjacent publicly owned conservation and recreation areas may be permitted if access to these areas is only available through the rest area and if these areas or their usage does not adversely affect the facilities of the safety rest area.
( e ) The scenic quality of the site, its accessibility and adaptability, and the availability of utilities are the prime considerations in the selection of rest area sites. A statewide safety rest area system plan should be maintained. This plan should include development priorities to ensure safety rest areas will be constructed first at locations most needed by the motorist. Proposals for safety rest areas or similar facilities on Federal-aid highways in suburban or urban areas shall be special case and must be fully justified before being authorized by the FHWA Regional Administrator.
( f ) Facilities within newly constructed safety rest areas should meet the forecast needs of the design year. Expansion and modernization of older existing rest areas that do not provide adequate service should be considered.
( g ) No charge to the public may be made for goods and services at safety rest areas except for telephone and articles dispensed by vending machines.
[43 FR 19390, May 5, 1978, as amended at 48 FR 38611, Aug. 25, 1983]
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4785 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4785

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 15, 2020

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1305 U.S. Highway 90 West in Castroville, Texas, as the ``Lance 
              Corporal Rhonald Dain Rairdan Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL RHONALD DAIN RAIRDAN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1305 U.S. Highway 90 West in Castroville, Texas, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Lance Corporal Rhonald Dain Rairdan Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lance 
Corporal Rhonald Dain Rairdan Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 14, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### In the Matter of Clifford W. Hartridge.

Application denied. Order to be settled on notice. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
386 P.2d 238

#### TRANSIT REMANUFACTURING CORPORATION, a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eustacio G. DURAN, Administrator of the Estate of Noel Duran, Deceased, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 7280.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Oct. 28, 1963.

Iden & Johnson, Richard G. Cooper, Albuquerque, for appellant.

Matteucci, Gutierrez & Franchini, Albuquerque, for appellee.

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

For review and disposition on appeal this cause was consolidated with Duran v. *142Transit Remanufacturing Corporation, No. 7290, N.M., 386 P.2d 237, and which came up from Division III, Bernalillo County, the Honorable Edwin L. Swope presiding. The controlling question in 7290 is whether Transit Remanufacturing Corporation is a self-insurer under the provisions of the New Mexico Workmen’s Compensation Act by virtue of a certificate theretofore issued by the Honorable M. Ralph Brown, a former District Judge of Bernalillo County.

Transit Remanufacturing Corporation obviously took a circuitous route. Prior to filing its answer in 7290, Transit Remanufacturing Corporation, sensing an ambiguity in the certificate, sought its clarification before the Honorable John B. McManus, Jr., District Judge of Division 1, Bernalillo County. Judge McManus entered an order sustaining the validity of the certificate. Thereupon, Transit Remanufacturing Corporation answered claiming to be a self-insurer under the Act. Subsequently, however, Judge McManus entered an order vacating his previous order in so far as it related to Duran, and it is from the latter order Transit Remanufacturing Corporation appeals.

Section 21-2-1(5) (2), 1953 Comp., provides for appeals “from such interlocutory judgments, orders or decisions of the district courts, as practically dispose of the merits of the action, so that any further proceeding therein would be only to carry into effect such interlocutory judgment, order or decision.”

Clearly the order does not “practically dispose of the merits of the action.” It merely leaves the legal status of the certificate undefined. That question is yet to be determined at a trial in cause No. 7290.

The order is not appealable and must be dismissed.

It is so ordered.

NOBLE and MOISE, JJ., concur.