alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 247.11 Notice.

If it appears to a district director that an alien residing in his district, who was lawfully admitted for permanent residence, has an occupational status described in section 247 of the Act, he shall cause a notice on Form I-509 to be served on such alien by personal service informing him that it is proposed to adjust his status, unless the alien requests that he be permitted to retain his status as a resident alien and executes and files with such district director a Form I-508 (Waiver of Rights, Privileges, Exemptions and Immunities) and, if a French national receiving salary from the French Republic, Form I-508F (election as to tax exemption under the Convention between the United States and the French Republic), within 10 days after service of the notice, or the alien, within such 10-day period, files with the district director a written answer under oath setting forth reasons why his status should not be adjusted. The notice shall also advise the person that he may, within such period and upon his request have an opportunity to appear in person, in support or in lieu of his written answer, before an immigration officer designated for that purpose. The person shall further be advised that he may have the assistance of counsel without expense to the Government of the United States in the preparation of his answer or in connection with such personal appearance, and may examine the evidence upon which it is proposed to base such adjustment.

[22 FR 9801, Dec. 6, 1957, as amended at 37 FR 11471, June 8, 1972]
Office of United States Trustee

1725 Duke Street, Suite 650

Alexandria, VA 22314

(703) 557-7229

E-mail: jack.i.frankel@usdoj.gov

United States Bankruptcy Court

Eastern District of Virginia

Alexandria Division

In re:

ISSAC K. AMANKWAH, Case No. 18-13848-bfk

Debtor. Chapter 7

Withdrawal of Withdrawal of Motion to Dismiss, Docket No. 14

 TO: Issac K. Amankwah

 c/o Lois Ilaine Upton, Esq.

 7369 McWhorter Place, Suite 412

 Annandale, VA 22003

 E-Mail uptonbknotices@gmail,com 

 TAKE NOTICE: 

The withdrawal of the motion of John P. Fitzgerald, III, Acting United 

States Trustee for Region 4, to dismiss this case for abuse pursuant to Section 

707(b) of the Bankruptcy Code is withdrawn.

April 8, 2019 John P. Fitzgerald, III

Acting United States Trustee

For Region 4

/s/ Jack Frankel

Jack Frankel, Attorney

Office of United States Trustee

Case 18-13848-BFK Doc 26 Filed 04/08/19 Entered 04/08/19 14:24:37 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
Certificate of Service

 I hereby certify that on the 8th day of April, 2019, this withdrawal of the 

withdrawal of motion to dismiss was e-mailed to the attoney for the Debtor at her 

e-mail address listed above.

/s/ Jack Frankel

Case 18-13848-BFK Doc 26 Filed 04/08/19 Entered 04/08/19 14:24:37 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 96655 / January 12, 2023

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-21140

In the Matter of

The Boeing Company,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-21141

In the Matter of

Dennis A. Muilenburg,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

On May 4, 2022, the Commission issued an Omnibus Order Directing the Engagement of 

Two Tax Administrators for Appointment on a Case-By-Case Basis in Administrative 

Proceedings that Establish Distribution Funds (the “Omnibus Order”).1 The Omnibus Order 

engaged Miller Kaplan Arase LLP and Heffler, Radetich & Saitta, LLP to serve as the 

Commission’s tax administrator (“Tax Administrator”), for selection and appointment on an 

individual case basis, for calendar years 2022 through 2024 in administrative proceedings where 

the distribution fund may incur tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) 

under the Department of the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 94845 (May 4, 2022).
2

The Director of the Division of Enforcement is authorized to appoint a Tax Administrator 

pursuant to the Omnibus Order.2 The Commission staff has requested the appointment of Miller 

Kaplan Arase LLP as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the Omnibus Order, Miller Kaplan Arase 

LLP is appointed as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.3

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

2

 See Delegation of Authority to Director of the Division of Enforcement, Securities Act Rel. No. 10900 (Dec. 10, 

2020).

3

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(ii).
### §5937. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 105–391, title II, §207, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3501, related to confidentiality of information. See section 100707 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
Fw: Revised Ch 7 - to mesh w/ preamble language 

 12/16/2011 04:53 PM 

From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US 

 

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov 

 

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Per Amanda's note below - we've accepted all your edits on Ch 7. 

----- Forwarded by RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US on 12/16/2011 04:52 PM 

----- 

From: Amanda CurryBrown/RTP/USEPA/US 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Bryan Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron 

Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 12/16/2011 04:39 PM 

Subject: Re: Fw: Revised Ch 7 - to mesh w/ preamble language 

We accepted her line edits on EO 12866 section, which we accepted. Those 

were the only new ones we saw. 

Amanda Curry Brown 

OAQPS/HEID/AEG 

919.541.3808 

CurryBrown.Amanda@epa.gov
### §760a. Atlantic Coast fish study for development and protection of fish resources

The Secretary of Commerce is directed to undertake a comprehensive continuing study of species of fish of the Atlantic coast, including bays, sounds, and tributaries, for the purpose of recommending to the States of such coast appropriate measures for the development and protection of such resources and their wisest utilization, whether for sports or commercial fishing or both, including the limitations on season, take per unit of time, per man, or per gear, or such other recommendations as will most effectively provide for the public the maximum production and utilization of such fish consistent with the maintenance of an adequate brood reserve.

(Aug. 25, 1950, ch. 782, §1, 64 Stat. 474; 1970 Reorg. Plan No. 4, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Transfer of functions to Secretary of Commerce from Secretary of the Interior by Reorg. Plan No. 4 of 1970, see note set out under section 755 of this title.
Treat yourself to healthy foods 

and get enough sleep

Take care of your body and get moving to lessen fatigue, 

anxiety, or sadness

Find new ways to safely connect with family and friends, 

get support, and share feelings

Care for yourself one small way each day 

Take breaks to relax and unwind 

through yoga, music, gardening, 

or new hobbies

320352-A

cdc.gov/coronavirus Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

Disaster Distress Hotline: 1-800-985-5990 or text TalkWithUs to 66746
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE FLIGHT STANDARDS AGENCY 

GLOBAL ACCESS FOR AMERICA 

20 Mar 2013 

MEMORANDUM FOR HQ FAA/AGC-10 

FROM: HQ AFFSA/A3OF 

 HQ AFFSA/AJW31AF 

 Bldg 4, Room 107 

 6500 S. MacArthur Blvd 

 Oklahoma City, OK 73169 

SUBJECT: FAR Exemption 134M (Regulatory Docket FAA-2001-9410) 

1. FAR Exemption 134, was granted to the United States Air Force on 1 Sep 70, as amended by 

134M on 9 Jul 2010, it exempts us from the provisions of Section 91.159. Our requirement to 

conduct photographic reconnaissance flights under the provisions of this exemption remains 

unchanged. We hereby request that the current exemption be renewed, IAW 14 CFR Part 11. 

2. As this is a longstanding exemption the Department of the Air Force requests that the 

expiration date of this exemption be extended to five years from the date of approval. 

3. Please contact me with any questions: (405) 734-8424 or e-mail hqaffsa.a3of@tinker.af.mil . 

We appreciate your assistance. 

 

 

 

 ALAN W. MYRICK, Major, USAF 

 Chief, Aircrew Procedures
#### § 105.11 Notice.

The Department shall make available, to employees, applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons, information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the Department, and make that information available to them in such manner as the Secretary finds necessary to apprise those persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by section 504 and the regulations in this part.
### §691b. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 12, 1930, ch. 469, §3, 46 Stat. 579, authorized the appropriation of $250,000 for purchase of land described in section 691 of this title.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 200 9-0 819

DCN: SE00547A1

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS I NFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Alexandria Division 

In re: ) 

) 

BEN POURBABAI, ) Case No. 18-13560-BFK 

 ) Chapter 11 

 Debtor. ) 

 

ORDER VACATING ORDER GRANTING RELIEF FROM STAY 

 Before the Court is the Debtor’s Motion for a Stay Pending Appeal. Docket No. 102. 

The Debtor’s Motion sought to stay the Court’s Order granting relief from the automatic stay as 

to Christine Pourbabai, the Debtor’s former spouse, and Kyle Skopic, the Commissioner of Sale 

appointed by the Circuit Court of Fairfax County, while the Debtor appealed the Court’s Order to 

the District Court. Docket No. 42. 

On February 11, 2019, Ms. Pourbabai, by counsel, filed an Opposition to the Debtor’s 

Motion for a Stay Pending Appeal. Docket No. 120. In her Opposition, Ms. Pourbabai stated that 

as of February 11, 2019, the Circuit Court of Fairfax County had terminated Ms. Skopic as 

Commissioner of Sale and directed the Debtor and Ms. Pourbabai to resolve the issue of selling 

their marital properties between themselves. Id., ¶ 13. 

This Court held a hearing on the Debtor’s Motion for a Stay Pending Appeal on February 

12, 2019. Fenlene H. Edrington, Esquire, counsel for the Debtor, and Jeffery T. Martin, Jr, 

Esquire, counsel for Ms. Pourbabai, were present in person. 

During the hearing, the Debtor, through counsel, withdrew his Motion for a Stay Pending 

Appeal citing the Circuit Court’s decision to remove Ms. Skopic as Commissioner of Sale. The 

Court also questioned the parties on whether it should sua sponte vacate its Order granting relief 

Case 18-13560-BFK Doc 136 Filed 02/22/19 Entered 02/22/19 17:37:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
2 

from the automatic stay for the same reason. Docket No. 42. Accordingly, for the reasons stated 

on the record, it is 

ORDERED:

1. The Court’s Order Granting Ms. Pourbabai’s and Ms. Skopic’s Motion for Relief 

from the Automatic Stay (Docket No. 42) is vacated. 

2. This Order is stayed for 14 days from the date of its entry in order for Ms. 

Pourbabai to file a Motion to reconsider the removal of Ms. Skopic as Commissioner of Sale in 

the Fairfax County Circuit Court. 

3. The Clerk will mail a copy of this Order, or provide electronic notice of its entry, 

to the parties below. 

Date: _____________________ ___________________________________ 

 Brian F. Kenney 

Alexandria, Virginia United States Bankruptcy Judge 

Copies to

Ben Pourbabai 

9896 Sunnybrook Dr. 

Great Falls, VA 22066 

Chapter 11 Debtor 

 

Fenlene H. Edrington, Esquire 

Moreton and Edrington, PLC 

297 Herndon Parkway 

Suite 203 

Herndon, VA 20170 

Counsel for Debtor 

Jeffery T. Martin, Esquire 

300 N. Washington Street, Suite 204 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

Counsel for Christine Pourbabai and Kyle Skopic

Feb 22 2019 /s/ Brian F. Kenney

Entered on Docket: February 22, 2019

Case 18-13560-BFK Doc 136 Filed 02/22/19 Entered 02/22/19 17:37:31 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
### §709. Delay in delivery caused by disruption of postal or other services

In any case in which the Register of Copyrights determines, on the basis of such evidence as the Register may by regulation require, that a deposit, application, fee, or any other material to be delivered to the Copyright Office by a particular date, would have been received in the Copyright Office in due time except for a general disruption or suspension of postal or other transportation or communications services, the actual receipt of such material in the Copyright Office within one month after the date on which the Register determines that the disruption or suspension of such services has terminated, shall be considered timely.

(Pub. L. 94–553, title I, §101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2594.)
# L_2013229EN.01S00301.xml

| 28.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 229/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 229/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
              INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CDT INC. FINANCIAL
              STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND
              IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>  1

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              42
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    42
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      42
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               51
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,142
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,867
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        42
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,502
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,502)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,502)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,502)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)


</TABLE>
### §916i. Taking of whales for biological experiments

Nothing contained in this subchapter shall prevent the taking of whales and the conducting of biological experiments at any time for purposes of scientific investigation in accordance with scientific permits and regulations issued by the Secretary of Commerce or shall prevent the Commission from discharging its duties as prescribed by the convention.

(Aug. 9, 1950, ch. 653, §11, 64 Stat. 424; 1970 Reorg. Plan No. 4, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Transfer of functions to Secretary of Commerce from Secretary of the Interior by Reorg. Plan No. 4 of 1970, see note set out under section 916 of this title.
#### § 335.1 Investigation of applicant.

Subsequent to the filing of an application for naturalization, the Service shall conduct an investigation of the applicant. The investigation shall consist, at a minimum, of a review of all pertinent records, police department checks, and a neighborhood investigation in the vicinities where the applicant has resided and has been employed, or engaged in business, for at least the five years immediately preceding the filing of the application. The district director may waive the neighborhood investigation of the applicant provided for in this paragraph.

[56 FR 50497, Oct. 7, 1991]
AGENDA FOR CONFERENCE CALL MEETING OF

THE SEC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON SMALL AND EMERGING COMPANIES

WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2016

BEGINNING AT 11:00 A.M. ET

Agenda Item

1 Call to Order

2 Roll Call 

3 Discussion on Outreach to Small Businesses

• Presentation by ACSEC Member Mark Walsh on Small 

Business Administration outreach

• Committee Discussion

4 Consideration of Recommendation Relating to Board Diversity

5 Adjournment

MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY ATTEND THE MEETING BY LISTENING TO THE WEBCAST 

ACCESSIBLE ON THE COMMISSION’S WEBSITE AT WWW.SEC.GOV
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 82118 / November 20, 2017

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-11578

In the Matter of

CIHC, INC., CONSECO SERVICES, 

LLC, and CONSECO EQUITY SALES, 

INC.,

Respondents.

ORDER DIRECTING DISBURSEMENT 

OF FAIR FUND

On January 19, 2010, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission 

(“Commission”) published an Amended Notice of Proposed Plan of Distribution and 

Opportunity for Comment (“Notice”) pursuant to Rule 1103 of the Commission’s Rules of Fair 

Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1103.

1

The Notice advised all interested parties 

that they could obtain a copy of the Distribution Plan from the Commission’s public website or 

by submitting a written request to George S. Canellos, Regional Director, United States 

Securities and Exchange Commission, 3 World Financial Center, Room 400, New York, NY 

10281. The Notice also advised that all persons desiring to comment on the Distribution Plan 

had to submit their comments, in writing, within 30 days of the date of the Notice. No comments 

were received in response to the Notice. On February 26, 2010, the Commission issued an Order 

Approving Plan, Appointing a Fund Administrator, and Waiving Bond.2

The Distribution Plan provides for the distribution of the disgorgement and civil penalties 

paid by the Respondents, plus any accumulated interest earned, less a reserve for taxes and any 

amounts determined to be payable upon appeal, to investors according to the methodology set 

forth in the Distribution Plan. The Independent Distribution Consultant (“IDC”) has conducted 

four rounds of distributions to date.

3

The IDC has submitted to the Commission staff a validated 

payment file for the fifth round of distribution totaling $5,140,771.95 to 73,913 investors. 

Commission staff has reviewed the validated payment file and requests that, pursuant to Rule 

 

1 Exchange Act Rel. No. 61209A (Jan. 19, 2010).

2 Exchange Act Rel. No. 61601 (Feb. 26, 2010).

3

 In the first round, $4,263,506.27, in the second round, $2,864,027.70, in the third round, $2,524,880.83, and in the 

fourth round, $903,956.39 was distributed in accordance with the Distribution Plan. See Exchange Act Release Nos. 

72999 (Sept. 4, 2014), 74522 (Mar. 17, 2015), 78370 (July 20, 2016), and 80452 (April 13, 2017) respectively.
2

1101(b)(6) of the Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans,4the Commission

authorize the distribution of $5,140,771.95 to the 73,913 investors in accordance with the 

Distribution Plan.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Commission shall transfer $4,640,771.95 from the 

Fair Fund to U.S. Bank, N.A., and the Fund Administrator shall distribute such monies to 

investors, along with $500,000 in funds held at U.S. Bank, N.A., as provided for in the 

Distribution Plan.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Brent J. Fields

Secretary

 

4

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(b)6.
April 1, 2015

Mr. Paul A DeCarlo

RE/MAX Southern Homes

PO Box 361614 Birmingham, AL 35236

Dear Mr. DeCarlo:

This letter is to inform you that we are unabl e to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we cannot proce ss your request and what you s hould do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your February 4, 2015 exemption re quest into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 0303), but we are unable to proces s your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR fr om which you seek relief and the extent of the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adve rsely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equa l to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or ar guments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any fu rther, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requi res you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days , we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additiona l time, you may call (202) 267-9521.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure