16448 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2011 / Notices 

In order to avoid an overlap in worker 

group coverage, the Department is 

amending the impact dates established 

for TA–W–74,839. The impact date 

applicable to workers of the Sample 

Manufacturing Department is August 

19, 2010. The impact date applicable to 

all other workers of St. Johns Knits, Inc., 

Irvine, California, is November 3, 2009. 

The amended notice applicable to 

TA–W–75,839 is hereby issued as 

follows: 

All workers of St. John Knits, Inc., Sample 

Manufacturing Department, Irvine, 

California, who became totally or partially 

separated from employment on or after 

August 19, 2010, through January 31, 2013, 

all other workers of St. John Knits, Inc., 

Irvine, California, who became totally or 

partially separated from employment on or 

after November 3, 2009, through January 31, 

2013, and all workers in the group threatened 

with total or partial separation from January 

31, 2011 through January 31, 2013, are 

eligible to apply for adjustment assistance 

under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act 

of 1974, as amended. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 8th day of 

March 2011. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6800 Filed 3–22–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–70,994] 

Hach Company a Subsidiary of 

Danaher Including On-Site Leased 

Workers From Express Employment 

Profesionals, Grants Pass, OR; 

Amended Certification Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 

19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor 

issued a Certification of Eligibility to 

Apply for Worker Adjustment 

Assistance on January 20, 2010, 

applicable to workers of Hack Company, 

a subsidiary of Danaher, Grants Pass, 

Oregon. The workers produce devices 

used to test air and water quality. 

The notice was published in the 

Federal Register on March 5, 2010 (75 

FR 10320). 

At the request of the State agency, the 

Department reviewed the certification 

for workers of the subject firm. The 

company reports that workers leased 

from Express Employment Professionals 

were employed on-site at the Grants 

Pass, Oregon location of Hach Company, 

s subsidiary of Danaher. The 

Department has determined that these 

workers were sufficiently under the 

control of Hach Company, subsidiary of 

Danaher to be considered leased 

workers. 

Based on these findings, the 

Department is amending this 

certification to include workers leased 

from Express Employment Professionals 

working on-site at the Grants Pass, 

Oregon location of Hach Company, a 

subsidiary of Danaher. 

The amended notice applicable to 

TA–W–70,994 is hereby issued as 

follows: 

All workers of Hach Company, a subsidiary 

of Danaher, including on-site leased workers 

from Express Employment Professionals, 

Grants Pass, Oregon, who became totally or 

partially separated from employment on or 

after June 4, 2008, through January 20, 2012, 

and all workers in the group threatened with 

total or partial separation from employment 

on the date of certification through two years 

from the date of certification, are eligible to 

apply for adjustment assistance under 

Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, 

as amended. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 15th day of 

March, 2011. 

Michael W. Jaffe, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6806 Filed 3–22–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers by (TA–W) number issued 

during the period of March 7, 2011 

through March 11, 2011. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The sales or production, or both, 

of such firm have decreased absolutely; 

and 

(3) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) Imports of articles or services like 

or directly competitive with articles 

produced or services supplied by such 

firm have increased; 

(B) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles into which one 

or more component parts produced by 

such firm are directly incorporated, 

have increased; 

(C) Imports of articles directly 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced outside the United 

States that are like or directly 

competitive with imports of articles 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced by such firm have 

increased; 

(D) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles which are 

produced directly using services 

supplied by such firm, have increased; 

and 

(4) The increase in imports 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in the 

sales or production of such firm; or 

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) There has been a shift by the 

workers’ firm to a foreign country in the 

production of articles or supply of 

services like or directly competitive 

with those produced/supplied by the 

workers’ firm; 

(B) There has been an acquisition 

from a foreign country by the workers’ 

firm of articles/services that are like or 

directly competitive with those 

produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; 

and 

(3) The shift/acquisition contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in public agencies and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the public agency have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2011 / Notices 16449 

(2) The public agency has acquired 

from a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with services 

which are supplied by such agency; and 

(3) The acquisition of services 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected secondary workers of a firm and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(c) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or 

Downstream Producer to a firm that 

employed a group of workers who 

received a certification of eligibility 

under Section 222(a) of the Act, and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article or service that was the basis 

for such certification; and 

(3) Either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied to 

the firm described in paragraph (2) 

accounted for at least 20 percent of the 

production or sales of the workers’ firm; 

or 

(B) A loss of business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm described in 

paragraph (2) contributed importantly to 

the workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in firms identified by 

the International Trade Commission and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) 

of the Act must be met. 

(1) The workers’ firm is publicly 

identified by name by the International 

Trade Commission as a member of a 

domestic industry in an investigation 

resulting in— 

(A) An affirmative determination of 

serious injury or threat thereof under 

section 202(b)(1); 

(B) An affirmative determination of 

market disruption or threat thereof 

under section 421(b)(1); or 

(C) An affirmative final determination 

of material injury or threat thereof under 

section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); 

(2) The petition is filed during the 

1-year period beginning on the date on 

which— 

(A) A summary of the report 

submitted to the President by the 

International Trade Commission under 

section 202(f)(1) with respect to the 

affirmative determination described in 

paragraph (1)(A) is published in the 

Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); 

or 

(B) Notice of an affirmative 

determination described in 

subparagraph (1) is published in the 

Federal Register; and 

(3) The workers have become totally 

or partially separated from the workers’ 

firm within— 

(A) The 1-year period described in 

paragraph (2); or 

(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), 

the 1-year period preceding the 1-year 

period described in paragraph (2). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,679 ......... LSI Greenlee Lighting, Inc .................................................................. Carrollton, TX ............................... September 17, 2009. 

74,709 ......... TeleTech Services Corporation, Teletech Holdings, Inc.; Leased 

Workers United Parcel Services of America, Inc.

Greenville, SC .............................. October 8, 2009. 

74,747 ......... F. J. Folz Company, Inc ..................................................................... Evansville, IN ............................... October 15, 2009. 

75,136 ......... Data Listing Services (Jamestown), LLC, The Connection; Data 

Listing Services, LLC.

Penn Yan, NY .............................. January 24, 2010. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services) of the Trade Act have been 

met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,876 ......... Contec, LLC ........................................................................................ SeaTac, WA ................................. November 9, 2009. 

75,021 ......... Thompson Type, Inc ........................................................................... San Diego, CA ............................. December 17, 2009. 

75,028 ......... Alpha Technology Corporation, Alpha Corporation ............................ Howell, MI .................................... December 20, 2009. 

75,028A ....... Leased Workers from Employment Plus, Endevis, Acteon Partners, 

etc., Alpha Technology Corporation.

Howell, MI .................................... December 20, 2009. 

75,067 ......... JLG Industries, Inc., Access Segment; Oshkosh Corporation; 

Leased Workers Aerotek.

McConnellsburg, PA .................... January 3, 2011. 

75,080 ......... American Pad & Paper, LLC, Esselte Corporation; Leased Workers 

from Administaff Companies II, etc. 

Mattoon, IL ................................... January 7, 2010. 

75,116 ......... Cooper Industries, Cooper Power Systems Division; Leased Workers from Aerotek Staffing.Pewaukee, WI .............................. January 18, 2010. 

75,219 ......... United Parcel Service, Inc. (Ohio), Billing Operations, Spherion ....... West Columbia, SC ...................... February 8, 2010. 

75,229 ......... H.C. Starck, Inc., Ceramics and Surface Technology/Advanced Metals and Ceramic Powders Dept.Coldwater, MI ............................... February 4, 2010. 

75,271 ......... Broyhill Furniture Industries, Inc., Corporate Office; Including 

Leased Workers and Workers Wages Reported Under, etc.

Lenoir, NC .................................... December 3, 2010. 

75,296 ......... S4Carlisle Publishing Services ........................................................... Dubuque, IA ................................. February 14, 2010. 

75,305 ......... UDR, Inc., Accounting Department .................................................... Glen Allen, VA .............................. February 9, 2010. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
16450 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 23, 2011 / Notices 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

75,161 ............ Continental Plastics Company, Leased Workers from ETS Staffing Fraser, MI .................................... January 31, 2010. 

75,161A .......... Continental Plastics Company, Leased Workers from Randstad 

Staffing and Recruiting.

Alpharetta, GA ............................. January 31, 2010. 

75,161B .......... Continental Plastics Company, Chesterfield, Inc., Leased Workers 

from ETS Staffing.

Chesterfield, MI ........................... January 31, 2010. 

75,161C .......... Continental Coatings, LLC, Leased Workers from ETS Staffing ..... China Township, MI .................... January 31, 2010. 

75,161D .......... Continental Industries, LLC, Leased Workers from ETS Staffing .... Benzonia, MI ............................... January 31, 2010. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or 

(b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or 

threat of separation) of section 222 has 

not been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

75,131 ............ JLG Industries, Inc., Access Division; Oshkosh Corporation ........... Hagerstown, MD. 

75,310 ............ BancTec, Field Service Representatives .......................................... N/A, NC. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A) 

(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift 

in production or services to a foreign 

country) of section 222 have not been 

met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,894 ......... Cross Creek Furniture ........................................................................ Hudson, NC. 

Determinations Terminating 

Investigations of Petitions for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

After notice of the petitions was 

published in the Federal Register and 

on the Department’s Web site, as 

required by Section 221 of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated 

investigations of these petitions. 

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

because the petitions are the subject of 

ongoing investigations under petitions 

filed earlier covering the same 

petitioners. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

75,269 ......... Evergreen Solar, Inc., 112 Barnum Road; Leased Workers Advantage Technical Resources and Kelly Service.Devens, MA .................................. February 11, 2010. 

75,272 ......... Evergreen Solar, Inc., Leased Workers from Advantage Technical 

Resources.

Marlboro, MA. 

I hereby certify that the 

aforementioned determinations were 

issued during the period of March 7, 

2011 through March 11, 2011. Copies of 

these determinations may be requested 

under the Freedom of Information Act. 

Requests may be submitted by fax, 

courier services, or mail to FOIA 

Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or 

tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These 

determinations also are available on the 

Department’s Web site at http:// 

www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the 

searchable listing of determinations. 

Dated: March 16, 2011. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6804 Filed 3–22–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–73,938] 

Management Resources Group, Inc., 

Including Workers in the States of 

Georgia and New York Reporting to 

Southbury, CT; Notice of Revised 

Determination on Remand 

On January 13, 2011, the United 

States Court of International Trade 

(USCIT) granted the Department of 

Labor’s request for voluntary remand to 

conduct further investigation in Former 

Employees of Management Resources 

Group, Inc. v. United States Secretary of 

Labor, Court No. 10–00345. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES