alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 475I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 475I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6425 November 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 475I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6425 November 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2021/C 475 I/01 | Council Decision of 23 November 2021 adopting the Council’s position on draft amending budget No 6 of the European Union for the financial year 2021 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2021/C 475 I/01

Council Decision of 23 November 2021 adopting the Council’s position on draft amending budget No 6 of the European Union for the financial year 2021

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### William E. Barhite, Appellant, v. Mary A. Barhite, Individually and as Administratrix, etc., and Others, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
### §581i–1. Advance of funds for cooperative research

For the purpose of fostering and stimulating participation with the Forest Service in forest, range, and watershed management research through investigations, experiments, tests, or such other means as he may deem advisable, and in order to aid in obtaining the fullest cooperation from States and other public and private agencies, organizations, institutions, and individuals, in effectuating such research the Secretary of Agriculture is authorized in accordance with such regulations as he may issue and when in his judgment such cooperative work will be stimulated or facilitated to make funds available to the cooperators without regard to the provisions of section 3324(a) and (b) of title 31, prohibiting advances of public moneys.

(Apr. 24, 1950, ch. 97, §20, as added Apr. 6, 1956, ch. 176, 70 Stat. 100.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

"Section 3324(a) and (b) of title 31" substituted in text for "section 3648, Revised Statutes [31 U.S.C. 529]" on authority of Pub. L. 97–258, §4(b), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1067, the first section of which enacted Title 31, Money and Finance.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dan Moses, Chief Financial Officer of STEC, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report of the Company
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ DAN MOSES          
|Dan Moses              
|Chief Financial Officer

August 13, 2007
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3

Alexander Gersh
48 Arden Road
London
N3 3AE


31 July 2003


Dear Alex,

                               CONTRACT VARIATION


I write to confirm there was an error in the gross up calculation on the Sign on
Bonus in your Contract of Employment dated 10th June 2003. The correct amount
should have been 134,723.00 GBP using the company defined exchange rate of
1.6355

We will pay the residual amount with the next available payroll.

Please accept my apologies for any inconvenience this may have caused.

Yours sincerely,


/s/ Jayne Gymer
-------------------------------------
Jayne Gymer
Senior Vice-President, Human Resources
#### § 101.79 Cross-examination.

A witness may be cross-examined on any matter material to the proceeding without regard to the scope of his direct examination.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-41015 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ALFONSO BARRIENTOS-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-001-CR-496-ALL

-------------------- June 19, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Alfonso Barrientos-Lopez appeals his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that his indictment was defective under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments because it did not allege general intent. Barrientos concedes that his argument is foreclosed by Fifth Circuit precedent, but he seeks to preserve the issue for SupremeNo. 01-41015 -2- Court review. Because the indictment in this case alleged a violation of § 1326, Barrientos’ conviction is AFFIRMED. See United States v. Berrios-Centeno , 250 F.3d 294, 299-300 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 122 S. Ct. 288 (2001). AFFIRMED.
J. Hardesty

Parraguirre intervention is warranted. 

### Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Petitioner has not provided a written order from either the May 29 or June 6, 2013, hearings that petitioner appears to be challenging. 1 This petition is therefore improper, as an oral order is ineffective because the district court remains free to reconsider the issue. 

### Div. of Child & Family Servs. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 445, 451, 92 P.3d 1239, 1243 (2004). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

cc: Chief Judge, The Eighth Judicial District Court Hon. J. Charles Thompson, Senior Judge Moran Law Firm, LLC Abrams Law Firm, LLC Eighth District Court Clerk

'Petitioner has also not provided the transcripts from either the May 29 or June 6, 2013, hearings.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2
#### Bertha Epstein, Respondent, v. John Mullins & Sons, Inc., Appellant. John Mullins & Sons, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Bertha Epstein et al., Defendants.

*666Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.2
                        Rule 13(a)-14(a) Certification

I, JAMES GRAINER, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
GreenWorks Corporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:

a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and,

c.	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):

a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and,

b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.

By: /S/ JAMES GRAINER
-------------------------
JAMES GRAINER
Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 16, 2005
### §760–2. Establishment of fish hatchery in Montana

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to establish, construct, equip, operate, and maintain a new fish hatchery in the vicinity of Miles City, Montana.

(June 4, 1956, ch. 366, §1, 70 Stat. 247.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Miles City National Fish Hatchery

Pub. L. 99–432, §7, Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 990, provided that: "Notwithstanding any other law, the Secretary of the Interior shall convey to the State of Montana, without reimbursement to the United States and no later than thirty days following enactment of this legislation [Oct. 1, 1986], all of the rights (including all water rights), title, and interest of the United States in and to the fish hatchery property located south of Miles City, Montana, and known as the Miles City National Fish Hatchery, consisting of 168.22 acres, more or less, of land, together with any improvements and related personal property thereon. The property conveyed shall be used by the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks as part of the Montana fishery resources management program. If the property conveyed is ever used for other than these purposes, title to such property shall revert to the United States."

Similar provisions were contained in Pub. L. 99–500, §101(h) [title I, §112], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783–242, 1783–262, and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(h) [title I, §112], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341–242, 3341–262.

#### Appropriations

Section 2 of act June 4, 1956, authorized an appropriation of $465,000 to carry out this section.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v. LARRY JOSEPH PRINCE , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 17

- 0 643 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR 2011

- 007328

- 004 The Honorable Rosa Mroz , Judge REVIEW GRANTED; RELI EF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney’s Office , Phoenix By Diane Meloche Counsel for Respondent Larry Joseph Prince , Florence Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Michael J. Brown, Judge Maria Elena Cruz, and Judge David D. Weinzweig delivered the decision of the Court. FILED 5-15-2018STATE v. PRINCE Decision of the Court

2 PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Larry Joseph Prince seeks review of the superior court ’ s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief, fil ed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner’s third successive petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v . Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of di scretion. ¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review and deny relief.
_

h OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

: AUSTINor a&deexsurmionwas not on Ykte business, but upon 8

tdseltm or for raamtw prsons1 to tbo ostpzoycte. so tar an appear6 Prom the oxpensa acoaunt, tltoreforo, the QXpamoa di6allorad uero nut incuW ~&ii0 on state butiw, oud the Gwiptrollwr PP~ not onWtii&WwTepuirod by leu to r#use pqmant.

Lt ls of Tut importw~ee in tbla aonn4wfion that s the stata%

Qxjieasem dgbt or would bars bwa lntnrrrsd in the’ mabomb Une 0P travel from &will0 to Austin. It 2s mutriaLoat t%

### po&ntout that they were tm so lnaurmd; tbnt oxyonmea

ln%urr%din the 

### rooroxmble**‘ Line**  %f travel at-% in%urmd w trav?iIlag on St8te~mbuslnema, whir0 expen~r in%urr%d%uts$g~the reasonable liae ef’ travel are not iwtlm tile tmwoiing on statoh bumine0~.
### Geology of the Clark Fork quadrangle, Idaho-Montana

By: Jack Edward HarrisonDaniel Alfred Jobin

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1141K

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

 
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Imperial Bancorp:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 
2-75352), (No. 2-61660), (No. 2-98462) and (No. 2-75353) on Forms S-8 and S-16 
of Imperial Bancorp of our report dated January 25, 1999, relating to the
consolidated balance sheet of Imperial Bancorp and subsidiaries as of December
31, 1998 and 1997 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
shareholders' equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, which report appears in
the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Imperial Bancorp.



                                      KPMG LLP



Los Angeles, California
March 31, 1999
#### In the Matter of Dave Roye, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[824 NYS2d 491]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent which found guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with fighting, creating a disturbance, possessing a weapon and refusing a direct order. He was found guilty of the charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing, and the determination was upheld on administrative appeal with a modified penalty. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report and the testimony of its author, who witnessed the incident, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Griffith v Selsky,*32 AD3d 595, 596 [2006]; *Matter of Price v Goord,*29 AD3d 1203, 1204 [2006]). To the extent that contrary testimony was presented, resolution of credibility issues is left to the Hearing Officer’s discretion *(see Matter of Cunningham v Selsky,*29 AD3d 1254, 1255 [2006]; *Matter of Price v Goord, supra*at 1204). Finally, petitioner was not denied adequate assistance as the specific documents that he requested did not exist *(see Matter of Hynes v Goord,*30 AD3d 652, 653 [2006]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claim of hearing officer bias, have been reviewed and determined to be without merit.

Mercure, J.E, Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Exhibit
32.1





SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION





In
connection with the Annual Report of HEICO Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the period ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) I, Laurans A. Mendelson,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      December 23, 2009
            /s/ LAURANS A. MENDELSONLaurans
      A. MendelsonChief
      Executive Officer
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-02T05:04:59-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
**Exhibit32.2**

 

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with thequarterly report of The SCO Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q, for thethree and six months ended April 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bert B. Young, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Bert B. Young       |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Bert B. Young           |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 
| Date: | June 2, 2005 |
|-------|--------------|

 

** **

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dan Moses, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of STEC, Inc. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ DAN MOSES                                       
|Dan Moses                                           
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

May 9, 2008
#### Daniel C. Sands, Plaintiff, v. Thomas Gilleran and Millett Realty Company, Appellants, Impleaded with Woodson R. Oglesby, Respondent, and Others, Defendants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
!"#
$

 	!

%&'	('
)	*+
%	+
	&'&,
&	
(-&.

+	+
/   0 
&(	
1&..&1&((
	-(2&+,

003-&	&.
(
+	-*+(+-
4&-&&&

&	
(	-&
	-&&	
(-&.-&'&-3&&

5663	
(-&.+-		

--)

	)	-&'&-3-&&+		

5663-
	78),(
&,&.&'
+


9::::::::
,	;

+	2&&708-)
-
&
	-	<-&&

+		

5663)&		--	&+,
=,)''-&&

	(&	)2	--

&(
	%	+
&
+	

(+,-(	)4+	+
/   078787
83-&&+		

5663-&'&,
&(	1	
	)
&

&)&2&(+(	
	)21-&''-&,)
	(
''('


(  %%	+-&,&,	
	&&(+,	
	)
	'
)&

-'&&	- 

-
	78';&.)'))	
,,--+(&
3',
)	


	&5	-	
	)	
,,&.',,())	
,,--+(&

	

&
	%	+ 



:::::::::::::::::::::::::::


	& $)

/  
;	+()>+-.

;
	%&

??%
'= @
	'

%
'= @
	'3%	+

00
	A&.
	3 #00

,4-	&3B#

708!!

B
!#

0.00

/s/ Brian F. Kenney

Jan 22 2018

EOD: 1/24/2018

Case 17-13654-BFK Doc 32 Filed 01/24/18 Entered 01/24/18 10:21:19 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 4
C
(,+,D078	&&(&


%
	.
&.
	-	2-
	-)-?
		1-+
,,(	)	&

+	+
C
(,+,D078 

  ??%
'= @
	':  

%
'= @
	'3	%	+

Case 17-13654-BFK Doc 32 Filed 01/24/18 Entered 01/24/18 10:21:19 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 4
5	-	
&'&,3.


	'	

!"#
$


	



	'	

	
	

00=	;	(&	(,

	-
3B0

&(,> 5 -,	


	)
	
	

&	-,	3CC

0	)
	

;
+	3+&0

A

-	&-.3BD

%
'= @
	'

	%	+

00 A&.
	3 #00

,4-	&3B#

Case 17-13654-BFK Doc 32 Filed 01/24/18 Entered 01/24/18 10:21:19 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 4
Case 17-13654-BFK Doc 32 Filed 01/24/18 Entered 01/24/18 10:21:19 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 4
#### Jefferson Terminal Corporation et al., Appellants, v. Home Insurance Company, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [180 Misc. 30.]