alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
___________________________________ 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERCA
 

Before the 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 52678 / October 26, 2005 

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-11515 

: 

In the Matter of : 

: ORDER APPROVING PLAN OF 

CHARLES W. CROUSE and : FUND DISTRIBUTION, 

NORMAN R. HESS : APPOINTING ADMINISTRATOR,

 : AND CONSOLIDATING 

Respondents. : SETTLEMENT FUNDS FOR 

: ADMINISTRATION 

___________________________________ : 

On August 17, 2005, the Commission published a notice of the Plan of 

Disgorgement and Fair Fund Distribution (“Plan”) (Release No. 34-52279) proposed by 

the Division of Enforcement (“Division”) in this proceeding. The Commission orders 

that the $34,384.65 paid by Norman R. Hess, comprised of disgorgement of $17,783.17, 

prejudgment interest of $6,601.48, and a civil penalty of $10,000, and the $74,945.71 to 

be paid by Charles W. Crouse, comprised of disgorgement of $54,121 and prejudgment 

interest of $20,824.71, be placed in a Fair Fund pursuant to Rule 1100 of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans. The proposed plan of 

distribution provides for distribution to investors who had money deposited into the 

account of Mark Drucker at Fidelity National Capital Investors, Inc. (#28309219, 

formerly Account #4G-01295-8) from the inception of the account in December 1997 

through September 1999, or who otherwise participated in the investment scheme of 

Mark Drucker. The Commission received no comments in response to the publication of 

the Division’s proposed plan. 

The Division proposes in its Plan that Nancy Chase Burton, Assistant Chief 

Litigation Counsel, Washington, DC Office, be designated as Administrator of the Plan. 

The Division also requests that the settlement funds in this proceeding be consolidated 

with the settlement fund in In the Matter of Fidelity National Capital Investors, Inc., A.P. 

File No. 3-11514, for the purposes of distribution administration. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Plan is approved; 
 

2
 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Nancy Chase Burton is appointed as 

Administrator of the Plan in accordance with the terms of the Plan; and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the settlement funds in this proceeding be 

consolidated with the settlement fund in In the Matter of Fidelity National Capital 

Investors, Inc., A.P. File No. 3-11514, for the purposes of distribution administration. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority. 

 Jonathan G. Katz

 Secretary
Certificate Number: 05781-VAE-DE-037220187

Bankruptcy Case Number: 17-31435

05781-VAE-DE-037220187

CERTIFICATE OF DEBTOR EDUCATION

I CERTIFY that on February 28, 2023, at 3:22 o'clock PM PST, Curnell

Westbrook completed a course on personal financial management given by

internet by Sage Personal Finance, a provider approved pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 

111 to provide an instructional course concerning personal financial management

in the Eastern District of Virginia.

Date: February 28, 2023 By: /s/Allison M Geving

Name: Allison M Geving

Title: President
### Geology and mineral deposits of the Twin Crags quadrangle, Idaho

By: Arthur Byron CampbellStanley E. Good

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1142A

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Preliminary report on the geology of some mineral deposits in the Twin Crags area, Kootenai County, Idaho(1949)                                    

                                        Geologic map of the Twin Crags quadrangle, Idaho(1952)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# Official Journal L 351/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.351.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 351 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5230 December 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.351.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 351

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5230 December 2009

---

| Contents | | V   Acts adopted from 1 December 2009 under the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Euratom Treaty | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS WHOSE PUBLICATION IS OBLIGATORY |
| | * | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1297/2009 of 22 December 2009 repealing the anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 172/2008 on imports of ferro-silicon originating in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia | 1 |
| | | ACTS WHOSE PUBLICATION IS NOT OBLIGATORY |
| | | 2009/1022/EU |
| | * | Council Implementing Decision of 15 December 2009 authorising the Republic of Estonia to apply a measure derogating from Article 167 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax | 4 |

Contents

V   Acts adopted from 1 December 2009 under the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Euratom Treaty

page

ACTS WHOSE PUBLICATION IS OBLIGATORY

*

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1297/2009 of 22 December 2009 repealing the anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 172/2008 on imports of ferro-silicon originating in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

1

ACTS WHOSE PUBLICATION IS NOT OBLIGATORY

2009/1022/EU

*

Council Implementing Decision of 15 December 2009 authorising the Republic of Estonia to apply a measure derogating from Article 167 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax

4

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Manouch Moshayedi, Chief Executive Officer of SimpleTech, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/ MANOUCH MOSHAYEDI 

                                                               

Manouch Moshayedi 

Chief Executive Officer 

 

April 28, 2004
EXHIBIT A

Case 18-12579-BFK Doc 16-1 Filed 10/15/18 Entered 10/15/18 10:49:22 Desc

 Exhibit(s) Page 1 of 10
EXHIBIT B

Case 18-12579-BFK Doc 16-1 Filed 10/15/18 Entered 10/15/18 10:49:22 Desc

 Exhibit(s) Page 2 of 10
EXHIBIT C

Case 18-12579-BFK Doc 16-1 Filed 10/15/18 Entered 10/15/18 10:49:22 Desc

 Exhibit(s) Page 3 of 10
EXHIBIT D

Case 18-12579-BFK Doc 16-1 Filed 10/15/18 Entered 10/15/18 10:49:22 Desc

 Exhibit(s) Page 4 of 10
EXHIBIT E

Case 18-12579-BFK Doc 16-1 Filed 10/15/18 Entered 10/15/18 10:49:22 Desc

 Exhibit(s) Page 5 of 10
EXHIBIT F

Case 18-12579-BFK Doc 16-1 Filed 10/15/18 Entered 10/15/18 10:49:22 Desc

 Exhibit(s) Page 6 of 10
EXHIBIT G

Case 18-12579-BFK Doc 16-1 Filed 10/15/18 Entered 10/15/18 10:49:22 Desc

 Exhibit(s) Page 7 of 10
EXHIBIT H

Case 18-12579-BFK Doc 16-1 Filed 10/15/18 Entered 10/15/18 10:49:22 Desc

 Exhibit(s) Page 8 of 10
Case 18-12579-BFK Doc 16-1 Filed 10/15/18 Entered 10/15/18 10:49:22 Desc

 Exhibit(s) Page 9 of 10
Case 18-12579-BFK Doc 16-1 Filed 10/15/18 Entered 10/15/18 10:49:22 Desc

 Exhibit(s) Page 10 of 10
### §459i–2. Cumberland Island Parkway; right-of-way; administration; regulations

For the purpose of providing access from Interstate 95 to the mainland administrative and visitor facilities of the seashore, the Secretary may designate as the Cumberland Island Parkway a right-of-way, together with adjacent or related sites for public noncommercial recreational use and for interpretation of scenic and historic values, of not more than one thousand acres of lands, waters, and interests therein. The Secretary is authorized to acquire only by donation those lands and interests therein, and other property comprising such right-of-way, and adjacent or related sites as he may designate pursuant to sections 459i to 459i–9 of this title for the development, hereby authorized, of a roadway of parkway standards, including necessary bridges, spurs, connecting roads, access roads, and other facilities, and for the development and interpretation of recreation areas and historic sites in connection therewith. Lands acquired for the parkway shall be administered as a part of the seashore, subject to all laws and regulations applicable thereto, and subject to such special regulations as the Secretary may promulgate for the parkway.

(Pub. L. 92–536, §3, Oct. 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 1066.)
### §4751. Environmental impact analyses

The Secretary of State, in consultation with the Council on Environmental Quality, is encouraged to enter into negotiations with the governments of Canada and Mexico to provide for reciprocal cooperative environmental impact analysis of major Federal actions which have significant transboundary effects on the quality of the human environment in the United States, Canada, and Mexico.

(Pub. L. 101–646, title I, §1401, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4773; Pub. L. 104–332, §2(h)(1), Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4091.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–332 made technical amendment to Pub. L. 101–646, §1401, which enacted this section.
#### § 30.31 How does the Secretary apply funds recovered by offset if multiple debts are involved?

If the Secretary collects more than one debt of a debtor by administrative offset, the Secretary applies the recovered funds to satisfy those debts based on the Secretary's determination of the best interests of the United States, determined by the facts and circumstances of the particular case.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3(a)(1) and 1226a-1, 31 U.S.C. 3716(b))
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - 22 CFR Parts 120, 122, 123 and 129
          - [Public Notice: 7386]
          - RIN 1400-AC74

# AGENCY:

Department of State.

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of State published a proposed rule in the                         **Federal Register**                         on February 24, 2011, concerning a proposed “DS-2032 Statement of Registration” Information Collection. The proposed rule contained incorrect addresses for the submission of public comments concerning the information collection.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Tanya Phillips, 202-632-2879

## Correction

In the proposed rule FR Doc. 2011-3878 of February 24, 2011, page 10293, in the second column, correct lines 47 through 71 to read as follows:

“Comments from the public on the information collection may be submitted until May 23, 2011.

Comments should be sent by any of the following methods:
      -  E-mail: DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov                              with the subject line, “Electronic Payment of Registration Fees.”                        
      -  Mail:                              PM/DDTC, SA-1, H1200, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance, ATTN: Electronic Payment of Registration Fees, Bureau of Political Military Affairs, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-0112.                        
      -  Internet:                              View and comment on the original notice by searching for its RIN (1400-AC74) on the U.S. Government regulations Web site at                              http://www.regulations.gov .”                        

Dated: March 17, 2011.

Robert S. Kovac,

Managing Director of Defense Trade Controls, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, U.S. Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2011-6977 Filed 3-23-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
#### § 222.159 When and where does a party seek judicial review?

If an LEA or a State that is aggrieved by the Secretary's final decision following an administrative hearing proceeding under this subpart wishes to seek judicial review, the LEA or State must, within 30 working days (as determined by the LEAs or State) after receiving notice of the Secretary's final decision, file with the United States Court of Appeals for the circuit in which that LEA or State is located a petition for review of the final agency action, in accordance with section 8011(b) of the Act.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7711(b))

[60 FR 50778, Sept. 29, 1995, as amended at 80 FR 33170, June 11, 2015]
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Richmond Division 

In re: 

TERRI M. JOHNSON, Case No. 18-30552-KLP 

 Chapter 13 

 Debtor. 

Order Setting Hearing 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a hearing will be held at: 

Judge Phillips’ Courtroom – U.S. Bankruptcy Court, 701 East Broad Street, Room 5100, 

Richmond, VA 23219 

Date: JULY 3, 2018 

Time: 10:00 AM 

for the Court to determine why the above-captioned case should not be dismissed due to the 

debtor’s / debtors’ failure to: 

take timely action under Local Bankruptcy Rule 3015-2. 

Date: June 19, 2018 /s/ Keith L. Phillips 

 United States Bankruptcy Judge 

Copies to: 

Debtor 

Attorney for Debtor, if applicable 

Trustee 

United States Trustee 

Entered on Docket: June 20 2018

Case 18-30552-KLP Doc 27 Filed 06/20/18 Entered 06/20/18 09:23:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
§ 21.54 Review by the Secretary. ( a ) The Secretary may decide to review— ( 1 ) An initial decision made by an adjudicative officer in a proceeding not subject to CRRA review;
( 2 ) An initial decision made by an adjudicative officer in a proceeding subject to CRRA review that was not appealed to the CRRA; or
( 3 ) A final decision made by the CRRA under § 21.53.
( b ) ( 1 ) The Secretary does not review a final decision made by an adjudicative officer of the General Services Administration Board of Contract Appeals.
( 2 ) The Secretary or a party to the proceedings may seek reconsideration of the final decision by an adjudicative officer of the General Services Administration Board of Contract Appeals on the fee application in accordance with 48 CFR 6101.32.
( c ) The Secretary decides to review a decision under § 21.54(a) either— ( 1 ) Upon receipt of a written request for review by an applicant or Department's counsel; or
( 2 ) Upon the Secretary's own motion.
( d ) If the applicant or the Department's counsel seeks a review, the request must be submitted to the Secretary, in writing, within 30 days of— ( 1 ) An initial decision in a proceeding not subject to CRRA review; or
( 2 ) A final decision of the CRRA.
( e ) The Secretary decides whether to accept or reject a request for review of an initial decision made by the adjudicative officer in a proceeding not subject to CRRA review or a final decision of the CRRA within 30 days after receipt of a request for review.
( f ) The Secretary may decide on his own motion to review a decision made under § 21.54(a) within 60 days of the initial decision by the adjudicative officer or a final decision of the CRRA.
( g ) If the Secretary decides to review the adjudicative officer's initial decision or the CRRA's final decision— ( 1 ) The Secretary reviews the adjudicative officer's initial decision or the CRRA's final decision on the basis of the written record of the proceedings on the application. This includes, but is not restricted to— ( i ) The written request for review;
( ii ) The adjudicative officer's findings as described in § 21.51(b); and
( iii ) If applicable, the final decision of the CRRA, if any; and
( 2 ) The Secretary either— ( i ) Issues a final decision; or
( ii ) Remands the application to the adjudicative officer or the CRRA for further proceedings.
( h ) If the Secretary issues a final decision, the Secretary's decision— ( 1 ) Is in writing;
( 2 ) States the reasons for the decision; and
( 3 ) If the decision is adverse to the applicant, advises the applicant of its right to petition for judicial review under § 21.56.
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 557 (b) and (c))
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TRX, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 4, 2006



/s/ Norwood H. (Trip) Davis, IIINorwood H. (Trip) Davis, IIIChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Lindsey B. SykesLindsey B. SykesChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
§ 226.12 What selection criteria does the Secretary use in evaluating an application for a State Charter School Facilities Incentive program grant? The selection criteria for this program are as follows: ( a ) *Need for facility funding.* ( 1 ) The need for per-pupil charter school facility funding in the State.
( 2 ) The extent to which the proposal meets the need to fund charter school facilities on a per-pupil basis.
( b ) *Quality of plan.* ( 1 ) The likelihood that the proposed grant project will result in the State either retaining a new per-pupil facilities aid program or continuing to enhance such a program without the total amount of assistance (State and Federal) declining over a five-year period.
( 2 ) The flexibility charter schools have in their use of facility funds for the various authorized purposes.
( 3 ) The quality of the plan for identifying charter schools and determining their eligibility to receive funds.
( 4 ) The per-pupil facilities aid formula's ability to target resources to charter schools with the greatest need and the highest proportions of students in poverty.
( 5 ) For projects that plan to reserve funds for evaluation, the quality of the applicant's plan to use grant funds for this purpose.
( 6 ) For projects that plan to reserve funds for technical assistance, dissemination, or personnel, the quality of the applicant's plan to use grant funds for these purposes.
( c ) *The grant project team.* ( 1 ) The qualifications, including relevant training and experience, of the project manager and other members of the grant project team, including employees not paid with grant funds, consultants, and subcontractors.
( 2 ) The adequacy and appropriateness of the applicant's staffing plan for the grant project.
( d ) *The budget.* ( 1 ) The extent to which the requested grant amount and the project costs are reasonable in relation to the objectives, design, and potential significance of the proposed grant project.
( 2 ) The extent to which the costs are reasonable in relation to the number of students served and to the anticipated results and benefits.
( 3 ) The extent to which the non-Federal share exceeds the minimum percentages (which are based on the percentages under section 4304(k)(2)(C) of the ESEA), particularly in the initial years of the program.
( e ) *State experience.* The experience of the State in addressing the facility needs of charter schools through various means, including providing per-pupil aid and access to State loan or bonding pools.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1855-0012) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7221d(b))
[70 FR 15003, Mar. 24, 2005, as amended at 87 FR 3661, Jan. 25, 2022]