alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         765,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,170,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   691,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,835,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,620,000
<PP&E>                                       5,108,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,102,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,465,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,008,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        5,369,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,957,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,465,000
<SALES>                                     36,927,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            37,363,000
<CGS>                                       24,098,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               38,752,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,665,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              71,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,125,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   116,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,241,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (375,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,616,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.88)


</TABLE>
### §833d. Rate schedules; preparation, approval, and uniformity

Schedules of rates and charges for electric energy produced at the Fort Peck project and sold to purchasers as in this chapter provided shall be prepared by the Bureau and become effective upon confirmation and approval thereof by the Secretary of Energy. Subject to confirmation and approval by the Secretary of Energy, such rate schedules may be modified from time to time by the Bureau and shall be fixed and established with a view to encouraging the widest possible diversified use of electric energy. The said rate schedules may provide for uniform rate or rates uniform throughout prescribed transmission areas in order to extend the benefits of an integrated transmission system and encourage the equitable distribution of the electric energy developed at the Fort Peck project.

(May 18, 1938, ch. 250, §5, 52 Stat. 405; Pub. L. 95–91, title III, §301(b), Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 578.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Power marketing functions of Bureau of Reclamation, including construction, operation, and maintenance of transmission lines and attendant facilities, transferred to Secretary of Energy by section 7152(a)(1)(E), (3) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, and are to be exercised by Secretary through a separate Administration within Department of Energy.

"Secretary of Energy" substituted in text for "Federal Power Commission" pursuant to Pub. L. 95–91, §301(b), which is classified to section 7151(b) of Title 42.

The Federal Power Commission was terminated, and its functions, personnel, property, funds, etc., were transferred to the Secretary of Energy (except for certain functions which were transferred to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) by sections 7151(b), 7171(a), 7172(a), 7291, and 7293 of Title 42.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Executive and administrative functions of Federal Power Commission, with certain reservations, transferred to Chairman of such Commission, with authority vested in him to authorize their performance by any officer, employee, or administrative unit under his jurisdiction, by Reorg. Plan No. 9 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1265, set out as a note under section 792 of this title.

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-02-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-1996
<CASH>                                       8,932,125
<SECURITIES>                                10,504,603
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,740,285
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  8,584,034
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,856,492
<PP&E>                                      13,187,678
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,487,356
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,472,971
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       552,585
<OTHER-SE>                                  42,462,547
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                56,487,356
<SALES>                                     80,886,062
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            80,886,062
<CGS>                                       62,789,554
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               71,642,873
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,447,051
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,970,641
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,476,410
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,476,410
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 80435 / April 11, 2017

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) announced the temporary 

suspension, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange 

Act"), of trading in the securities of Sunshine Capital, Inc. (“SCNP”), of Hollywood, Florida, at 

9:30 a.m. EDT on April 12, 2017, and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 26, 2017. 

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of SCNP because of questions 

regarding the accuracy of assertions by SCNP in press releases to investors concerning, among 

other things, the liquidity and value of the company’s assets, namely DIBCOINS, a 

cryptocurrency. This order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act 

of 1934 (Exchange Act).

The Commission cautions broker-dealers, shareholders, and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by the company. 

Further, brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Rule 15c2-11 under the 

Exchange Act, at the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered unless 

and until they have strictly complied with all of the provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer 

has any questions as to whether or not he has complied with the rule, he should not enter any 

quotation but immediately contact the staff in the Division of Trading and Markets, Office of 

Interpretation and Guidance, at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is 

required by Rule 15c2-11, he should refrain from entering quotations relating to SCNP’s

securities until such time as he has familiarized himself with the rule and is certain that all of its 

provisions have been met. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of 

the rule, the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action.

If any broker-dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, contact

Valerie A. Szczepanik, Assistant Regional Director, New York Regional Office of the Securities 

and Exchange Commission at (212) 336-0175. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the 

Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
#### Aldisa Plunkett et al., Plaintiffs, v. Fifth Avenue Coach Company, Appellant, and Fullerton Transportation Co., Inc., Defendant-Respondent.

Close, P. J., Hagarty, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., dissents and votes to affirm.
# Official Journal C 343/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 343 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 657 September 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 343

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 657 September 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 343/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10849 – HUK / BRI / LNN / PITSTOP) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 343/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10849 – HUK / BRI / LNN / PITSTOP) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 343/02 | Euro exchange rates — 6 September 2022 | 2 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2022/C 343/03 | Information on national derogations from the visa requirement | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 343/02

Euro exchange rates — 6 September 2022

2

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2022/C 343/03

Information on national derogations from the visa requirement

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 343/04 | Publication of an application for registration of a name pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 72 |
| 2022/C 343/05 | Notice concerning a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU – Request made by a Contracting Entity | 77 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2022/C 343/04

Publication of an application for registration of a name pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

72

2022/C 343/05

Notice concerning a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU – Request made by a Contracting Entity

77

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal L 205/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 205 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5831 July 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 205

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5831 July 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1278 of 9 July 2015 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions as regards instructions, templates and definitions (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1278 of 9 July 2015 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions as regards instructions, templates and definitions (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
### §610. Permits to cut and remove timber; citizens of Washington County and Kane County, Utah

It shall be lawful for the Secretary of the Interior to grant permits under the provisions of section 607 of this title, to citizens of Washington County and of Kane County, Utah, to cut timber on the public lands of the counties of Mohave and Coconino, Arizona, for agricultural, mining, or other domestic purposes, and remove the timber so cut to said Washington County and Kane County, Utah.

(Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 561, §8 (part), as added Feb. 27, 1922, ch. 82, 42 Stat. 398.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is derived from act Feb. 27, 1922, which recites that it amends section 8 of act Mar. 3, 1891, which is the source of section 607 of this title, by adding this section thereto. Section 8 of act Mar. 3, 1891, is classified to sections 607, 608 to 611a of this title.
Exhibit 10.3

September 30, 2010

LOGO

David Cathcart

Chief Financial Officer

TRX, Inc.

2970 Clairmont Road

Suite 300

Atlanta, GA 30329



|Re: | Amendment 4 to Second Letter of Amendment
|--- | -----------------------------------------

Dear
David:

The purpose of this letter is to amend the Second Letter of Amendment dated December 23, 2009 as amended on June 7,
2010, July 30, 2010, and August 30, 2010. Effective September 30, 2010, Expedia and TRX now agree to amend the Second Letter of Amendment as follows:

Section 3 is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:

3)
Renewal of Pricing and Exclusivity for 2011. The pricing and exclusivity terms set forth in Section 1 and Section 2 of this Second Letter of Amendment will automatically be extended for calendar year 2011 unless either Party gives
the other Party written notice of non-renewal of such terms on or before October 15, 2010. If such notice is given, Section 1 and Section 2 will cease to apply, effective December 31, 2010, and the pricing terms under the
Agreement (and associated SOWs) that were in place prior to this Second Letter of Amendment will apply in calendar year 2011.

Please
acknowledge your agreement to the foregoing by signing in the space provided below and returning a signed copy to me as soon as possible. If you do not agree with any of the foregoing, please contact me as soon as possible so that we can determine
how best to proceed.



Yours truly,Expedia, Inc./s/ Dominique BourgaultDominique Bourgault Vice
President, Finance  Partner Services Group




|                         |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Acknowledged and Agreed:
|                        
|TRX, Inc.               
|                         | 
|By:                      |  | /s/ David D. Cathcart  
|Title:                   |  | Chief Financial Officer

|             |  |                  
|------------ |  | -----------------
|Date Signed: |  | 30 September 2010
2007 Ozone Plan 

## Chapter 5

Public Accountability2007 Ozone Plan This page intentionally blank.San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District April 30, 2007

Chapter 5: Public Accountability

2007 Ozone Plan 5-1 

## Chapter 5: Public Accountability

Although attainment of the federal 8-hour ozone standard will require efforts from the state and federal governments, the District is committed to doing its share. To ensure District accountability, the District will complete annual reports to show progress in fulfilling its ozone and particulate matter (PM) plan commitments. These reports will be made publicly available and will be presented to the Governing Board in April (to allow time for PM data compilation) of each year, beginning in 2008. The reports will include:

! A summary of progress made over the most recent calendar year in meeting the schedules for developing, adopting, and implementing the air pollution control measures in the District’s attainment plans 1

.

! A table summarizing the proposed and actual dates for adoption and implementation of each measure.

! Air quality data from the year, showing progress towards attaining the national ambient air quality standards.

! A report of incentive funding, including the amount of funds awarded and the estimated reductions from grant-funded projects. Major elements of this part of the report would include the following:

o Sources of funding

o Expenditures

o Types of projects funded

o Actual versus predicted emissions reductions

o Enforcement activities

! Number and type of inspections conducted on grantees

! Number of all grantees for whom there is evidence of noncompliance

! List of enforcement actions taken by the District and the resultant penalties and remedies.

o Description of the permanency of the funding sources and ideas for amending the program in the event of reduced funding.

! The status of vehicle use control measures implemented by city and county
governments 2

.

! A comparison of predicted versus current “best estimates” of emissions reductions for each measure and a short explanation of any shortfalls or surplus as well as a plan for rectifying shortfalls.

! Status of State of California control measures (from ARB and DPR)

These reports will be above and beyond any similar reports required by the federal

Clean Air Act or the California Clean Air Act.

1 Required by California Health and Safety Code Section 40924

2 A state requirement, required by ARB’s 1993 Guidance for Annual and Triennial Progress Reports Under the

California Clean Air ActSan Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District April 30, 2007

Chapter 5: Public Accountability

2007 Ozone Plan 5-2 This page intentionally blank.
The H onorable Scott O. Wright, United States Senior District Judge for th e 1 Western District of Missouri.



## United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-1731

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the Unite d States v. * District Court for the * Western District o f Missouri. Sherman D. Hampton, * * UNPUBLISHE D Appelllant. *

___________ Submitted: September 12, 1997

Filed: October 14, 1997

___________ Befo re BOWMAN, Circuit Judge, HENLEY, Senior Circui t Judge, and MORR IS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circui t Judge.

___________ PER CURIAM. Sherm an D. Hampton appeals from a judgment of th e district court entered after a jury found him guilty of 1 conspiring to manufacture, manufacturing and attemptin g-2-

to m anufacture methamphetamine, in violation of 2 1 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846. We affirm.-3-

While on patrol on April 15, 1996, shortly befor e midnight, deputy sheriff Mike Crocker saw a car with its trunk open in back of a storage shed and Deborah Floy d and Hampto n standing in the open door to the shed. When Crock er pulled up to the shed, Floyd threw a duffle ba g in the car's trunk and got in the car. Crocke r approached Hampton and asked what he was doing at the sh ed. Hampton be came abusive, but gave Crocker his license, as di d Floyd and Hampton's ex-wife, who was also in the car
. Afte r conducting a license check, Crocker went back t o the c ar and asked Hampton, who was then in the driver' s sea t, to step out of the vehicle. Hampton refused an d drove off. Crocker and two other patrol cars pursue d Hampton for about ten minutes before finally stopping the car and arresting Floyd and Hampton. On searchin g Ha mpton, officers found a bag of methamphetamine, a receipt for $1206 worth of Mini-Thins, which is a n ingredient used in the production of methamph etamine, and rece ipts for other items used in the manufacturin g proce ss. On executing a search warrant on the shed , officers found two cases of Mini-Thins and a laborator y for manufacturing methamphetamine.

In ad dition to the testimony of Crocker and othe r of ficers involved in the arrest and search, at tria l Floy d testified that she and Hampton had manufacture d methamphetamine a couple of weeks before the arrest an d that she was with Hampton when he purchased Mini-Thins , whi ch they were going to use to make mor e methamphetamine. Contrary to Hampton' s arguments on appeal, there was overwhelming evidence to support the conspiracy ,-4-

manufacturing, and attempt verdicts. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.-5-

A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT .
#### In the Matter of Andres S., Appellant. Wayne County Attorney, Respondent.

[823 NYS2d 747]

*1341Appeal from, an order of the Family Court, Wayne County (Dennis M. Kehoe, J.), entered March 1, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3. The order adjudged that respondent is a juvenile delinquent and placed respondent for a period of 12 months in the custody of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the fact-finding orders are vacated, and the matter is remitted to Family Court, Wayne County, for further proceedings on the petitions.

Memorandum: As petitioner correctly concedes, Family Court failed to comply with the nonwaivable provisions of Family Court Act § 321.3 in conducting the allocutions at issue. We therefore reverse the order of disposition, vacate the fact-finding orders, and remit the matter to Family Court for further proceedings on the petitions *(see Matter of Mary L.M.,*5 AD3d 1069 [2004]). Present—Hurlbutt, A.P.J., Gorski, Smith and Centra, JJ.