alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ALEXANDER HOLLAND,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

 

No.08-19-00249-CR

Appeal from the

299th District Court

of Travis County, Texas

(TC# D-1-DC-19-904012)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no reversible 

error in the judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 11TH OF JUNE, 2021.

LEE GABRIEL, Senior Justice (Ret.)

Before Palafox, J., Alley, J., and Gabriel, Senior Justice (Ret.)

Gabriel, Senior Justice (Ret.)(Sitting by Assignment)
Case 17-34665-KLP Doc 6840 Filed 04/05/19 Entered 04/05/19 14:25:51 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case 17-34665-KLP Doc 6840 Filed 04/05/19 Entered 04/05/19 14:25:51 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.1

[Heartsoft Logo]                                  [Animated Picture of Heartsoft
                                                 Inc.'s Chief Executive Officer]

Heartsoft

                                   CORPORATE NOTE

October 21, 1998

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned Maker promises to pay to the order of
(Issuer):

               Dale Hill
               5056 Westgrove Drive
               Dallas, Texas 752248

The sum of $50,000 (fifty thousand dollars), with interest from the date written
above until paid, at the rate of twenty percent (20%) per annum.

This Note, together with all interest due, is payable in full ninety (90) days
from the date written above.

As inducement for the purchase of this Note, the undersigned Maker hereby grants
to Issuer one-hundred thousand (100,000) shares of the Maker's restricted common
stock to be issued within 14 days of the date of this Note.

Maker shall reserve the right to prepay the principle of this Note, together
with all such accrued interest at the time of prepayment in whole or in part
prior to its due date without premium or penalty.

If this Note is not paid in full upon Maturity, Issuer has sole option of
converting said Note into 250,000 shares of Maker's common stock anytime 30 days
after default.

The Makers, signers, and endorsers of this note severally waive demand,
presentment, notice of dishonor, diligence in collection and notice of protest
and agree to all extensions and partial payments before or after maturity,
without prejudice to the holder.  This written Note represents the final
agreement between the parties and may not be contradicted by evidence of prior,
contemporaneous, or subsequent oral agreements of the parties.

MAKER:   Heartsoft, Inc.                     ISSUER:      Dale Hill


By:      /s/ Benjamin P. Shell                       By:  /s/ Dale Hill
         --------------------------                       ---------------------
         Benjamin P. Shell                                Dale Hill
         Chief Executive Officer



                   H E A R T S O F T,  I N C O R P O R A T E D
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          3101 North Hemlock Circle, Broken Bow, Oklahoma 74012 -
                      (918) 251-1066 - (800) 285-3475
               Fax: (918) 251-4018 - Web: www.heartsoft.com
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 463 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 463

Amending the Rules of Procedure and Practice in the Senate When Sitting 
                         on Impeachment Trials.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 6, 2020

    Mr. Hawley (for himself, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Braun, Mrs. 
 Blackburn, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Daines, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Cotton, Ms. Ernst, 
 Mr. Perdue, and Mr. Inhofe) submitted the following resolution; which 
       was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending the Rules of Procedure and Practice in the Senate When Sitting 
                         on Impeachment Trials.

    Resolved, That rule I of the Rules of Procedure and Practice in the 
Senate When Sitting on Impeachment Trials is amended to read as 
follows:
            ``I. Whensoever the Senate shall receive notice from the 
        House of Representatives that managers are appointed on their 
        part to conduct an impeachment against any person and are 
        directed to carry articles of impeachment to the Senate, the 
        Secretary of the Senate shall immediately inform the House of 
        Representatives that the Senate is ready to receive the 
        managers for the purpose of exhibiting such articles of 
        impeachment, agreeably to such notice. If, following adoption 
        of such articles, the House of Representatives does not so 
        notify the Senate or otherwise provide for such articles to be 
        exhibited to the Senate within 25 calendar days from the date 
        of adoption of such articles, as recorded in the Journal of the 
        House of Representatives, such articles shall be deemed 
        exhibited before the Senate and it shall be in order for any 
        Senator to offer a motion to dismiss such articles with 
        prejudice for failure by the House of Representatives to 
        prosecute such articles. Such motion shall be adopted by an 
        affirmative vote of a majority of the Senators, duly chosen and 
        sworn, without debate by the yeas and nays, which shall be 
        entered on the record.''.
                                 <all>
```
### §5936. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 105–391, title II, §206, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3500, related to integration of study results into management decisions. See section 100706 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
§ 110.31 Complaints. ( a ) Any person, individually or as a member of a class or on behalf of others, may file a complaint with ED alleging discrimination prohibited by the Act or by these regulations based on an action occurring on or after July 1, 1979. A complainant shall file a complaint within 180 days from the date the complainant first had knowledge of the alleged discrimination. However, for good cause shown, ED may extend this time limit.
( b ) ED attempts to facilitate the filing of complaints, if possible, by— ( 1 ) Accepting as a complete complaint any written statement that identifies the parties involved and the date the complainant first had knowledge of the alleged violation, describes generally the action or practice complained of, and is signed by the complainant;
( 2 ) Freely permitting a complainant to add information to the complaint to meet the requirements of a complete complaint;
( 3 ) Widely disseminating information regarding the obligations of recipients under the Act and these regulations;
( 4 ) Notifying the complainant and the recipient of their rights and obligations under the complaint procedure, including the right to have a representative at all stages of the complaint procedure; and
( 5 ) Notifying the complainant and the recipient (or their representatives) of their right to contact ED for information and assistance regarding the complaint resolution process.
( c ) A complaint is considered to be complete on the date that ED receives all the information necessary to process it, as described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( d ) ED returns to the complainant any complaint outside the jurisdiction of these regulations and states the reason or reasons why it is outside the jurisdiction of the regulations.
(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6103)
### §695m. Annual percentage payments of net revenues from leases of Klamath project lands on pro rata basis; limitation on payments; priority of use of net revenues

Subject to conditions hereafter prescribed, and pursuant to such regulations as may be issued by the Secretary, 25 per centum of the net revenues collected during each fiscal year from the leasing of Klamath project reserved Federal lands within the Executive order boundaries of the Lower Klamath National Wildlife Refuge and the Tule Lake National Wildlife Refuge shall be paid annually by the Secretary, without further authorization, for each full fiscal year after September 2, 1964 to the counties in which such refuges are located, such payments to be made on a pro rata basis to each county based upon the refuge acreage in each county: Provided, That the total annual payment per acre to each county shall not exceed 50 per centum of the average per acre tax levied on similar lands in private ownership in each county, as determined by the Secretary: Provided further, That no such payments shall be made which will reduce the credits or the payments to be made pursuant to contractual obligations of the United States with the Tulelake Irrigation District or the payments to the Klamath Drainage District as full reimbursement for the construction of irrigation facilities within said district, and that the priority of use of the total net revenues collected from the leasing of the lands described in this section shall be (1) to credit or pay from each revenues to the Tulelake Irrigation District the amounts already committed to such payment or credit; (2) to pay from such revenues to the Klamath Drainage District the sum of $197,315; and (3) to pay from such revenues to the counties the amounts prescribed by this section.

(Pub. L. 88–567, §3, Sept. 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 850.)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Kenneth R. WEST, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 01-6284.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 6, 2002.

Before MERRITT, SUHRHEINRICH, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

This matter is before the court upon consideration of the motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal as moot. It is asserted that the appellee is no longer seeking to have the appellant produce records and give testimony concerning his income for the years 1997, 1998 and 1999. The appellant has failed to respond to the motion to dismiss.

A review of the documents before the court indicates that the appellee filed a petition in the district court seeking to enforce an Internal Revenue summons. The district court’s judgment granting enforcement of the summons was entered September 27, 2001. The appellant appealed on October 16, 2001.

Although the appellant appealed the order granting enforcement of the summons, the appellee no longer seeks enforcement of the summons. No live controversy remains and the appeal is moot. *See Thomas Sysco Food Servs. v. Martin,*983 F.2d 60, 62 (6th Cir.1993).

Accordingly, the case is remanded to the district court with instructions to vacate their decision and dismiss the petition to enforce an Internal Revenue Service summons.
§ 207.2 Applicant processing. ( a ) *Interview.* Each applicant 14 years old or older shall appear in person before an immigration officer for inquiry under oath to determine his or her eligibility for admission as a refugee.
( b ) *Medical examination.* Each applicant shall submit to a medical examination as required by sections 221(d) and 232(b) of the Act.
( c ) *Sponsorship.* Each applicant must be sponsored by a responsible person or organization. Transportation for the applicant from his or her present abode to the place of resettlement in the United States must be guaranteed by the sponsor.
[76 FR 53783, Aug. 29, 2011]
### §460s–13. Authorization of appropriations

There are hereby authorized to be appropriated not more than $6,873,000 for the acquisition of lands and interests in land in connection with, and not more than $6,348,000 for development of, the Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore.

(Pub. L. 89–668, §14, Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 925.)
# L_2007185EN.01S00301.xml

| 17.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 185/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 185/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

In view of the situation which has arisen following enlargement, some editions of the Official Journal of 27, 29 and 30 December 2006 have been published, in a simplified manner, in the official languages of that date.

It has been decided to republish, as corrigenda and in the Official Journal’s traditional presentation, Acts which appear in those Official Journals.

It is for this reason that Official Journals which contain only those corrigenda have been published in the pre-enlargement language versions. The translations of Acts in the languages of the new Member States will be published in a special edition of the Official Journal of the European Union comprising texts of the institutions and the European Central Bank adopted prior to 1 January 2007.

Official Journal of the European Union

Given below is a list of the Official Journals published on 27, 29 and 30 December 2006 and their corresponding corrigenda.

| OJ of 27 December 2006 | Corrected OJ (2007) |
| --- | --- |
| L 370 | L 30 |
| L 371 | L 45 |
| L 373 | L 121 |
| L 375 | L 70 |

OJ of 27 December 2006

Corrected OJ (2007)

L 370

L 30

L 371

L 45

L 373

L 121

L 375

L 70

| OJ of 29 December 2006 | Corrected OJ (2007) |
| --- | --- |
| L 387 | L 34 |

OJ of 29 December 2006

Corrected OJ (2007)

L 387

L 34

| OJ of 30 December 2006 | Corrected OJ (2007) |
| --- | --- |
| L 396 | L 136 |
| L 400 | L 54 |
| L 405 | L 29 |
| L 407 | L 44 |
| L 408 | L 47 |
| L 409 | L 36 |
| L 410 | L 40 |
| L 411 | L 27 |
| L 413 | L 50 |

OJ of 30 December 2006

Corrected OJ (2007)

L 396

L 136

L 400

L 54

L 405

L 29

L 407

L 44

L 408

L 47

L 409

L 36

L 410

L 40

L 411

L 27

L 413

L 50

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE AUDITED BALANCE SHEET OF HORN SILVER MINES, INC. FOR THE PERIOD
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND THE RELATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          18,637
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,637
<PP&E>                                          14,075
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,439
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,844
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,701
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,627,573
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,844
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,149
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,667
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (34,518)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (34,518)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (34,518)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         OF FLAG TELECOM GROUP LIMITED

    This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on
Form 10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 of FLAG
Telecom Group Limited (the "Issuer").

    I, Michel Cayouette, the Chief Financial Officer of Issuer certify that:

    (i) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
        or 78o(d)); and

    (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Issuer.

Dated: July 3, 2003.

<Table>
<S>                                                    <C>    <C>                        <C>
                                                       /s/ MICHEL CAYOUETTE
                                                       --------------------------------
                                                       Name:  Michel Cayouette
</Table>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THESE SCHEDULES HAVE BEEN RESTATED TO CONFORM WITH EITF 97-2, AS SUCH, REVENUES
AND EXPENSES OF NON-OWNED MANAGED HOTELS ARE NO LONGER INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

EPS HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 128, AND BASIC AND DILUTED EPS
HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN THE PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED LINE ITEMS, RESPECTIVELY.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000316206
<NAME> STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             251
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      876
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         67
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,098
<PP&E>                                           6,612
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,471
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,368
<BONDS>                                         10,542
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,666)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,471
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,438
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,441
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 430
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (368)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (80)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (288)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,116
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       828
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.43
        

</TABLE>
§ 222.63 When is a local educational agency eligible as a continuing applicant for payment under section 8003(b)(2)(B)? A continuing heavily impacted LEA must have— ( a ) The same boundaries as those of a Federal military installation;
( b ) ( 1 ) An enrollment of federally connected children described in section 8003(a)(1) equal to at least 35 percent of the total number of children in average daily attendance (ADA) in the LEA;
( 2 ) A per pupil expenditure (PPE) that is less than the average PPE of the State in which the LEA is located or of all the States, whichever PPE is greater (except that an LEA with a total student enrollment of less than 350 students shall be determined to have met the PPE requirement); and
( 3 ) A tax rate for general fund purposes of at least 95 percent of the average tax rate of comparable LEAs identified under § 222.74 or all LEAs in the applicant's State;
( c ) ( 1 ) An enrollment of federally connected children described in section 8003(a)(1) equal to at least 30 percent of the total number of children in ADA in the LEA; and
( 2 ) A tax rate for general fund purposes of at least 125 percent of the average tax rate of comparable LEAs identified under §§ 222.39-40 or of all LEAs in the applicant's State; or
( d ) A total enrollment of at least 25,000 students, of which at least 50 percent are children described in section 8003(a)(1) and at least 6,000 of such children are children described in section 8003(a)(1)(A) and (B).
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7703(b)(2)(B))
Cullen D. Speckhart (VSB No. 79096) 

Jennifer T. Langley (VSB No. 81454) 

WOLCOTT RIVERS GATES 

919 E. Main Street, Ste. 1040, Richmond, Virginia 23219 

200 Bendix Road, Ste. 300, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23452 

Telephone: (757) 687-3644 

Email: hdl@wolriv.com 

Counsel to Plaintiff Richard Arrowsmith,

Liquidating Trustee of the HDL Liquidating Trust

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Richmond Division 

In re: Chapter 11 

 

HEALTH DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY, INC., 

et al., 

 Case No.: 15-32919-KRH 

 Debtors.1

 Jointly Administered 

 

RICHARD ARROWSMITH AS LIQUIDATING 

TRUSTEE OF THE HDL LIQUIDATING 

TRUST, 

 

 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

 Adv. Proc. No. 17-03846-KRH 

CAUSEWAY MEDICAL LLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, Jennifer T. Langley, certify that I am, and at all times during the service of process was, not less than 

18 years of age and not a party to the matter concerning which service of process was made. I further 

certify that service of the copies of the Complaint [Docket Item No. 1] together with the Order 

Approving Amended Procedures Governing Avoidance Action Adversary Proceedings and Summons 

and Notice in an Adversary Proceeding [Docket Item No. 3] were served on July 6, 2017, as follows: 

Mail Service: Regular, first class United States mail, postage fully pre-paid and addressed to: 

LYNNE MERCURIO 

REG. AGENT AND MANAGER 

403 BOUCHELLE DRIVE, SUITE 108 

NEW SMYRNA, FL 32169 

 

1

 The debtors in these cases, along with the last four digits of each debtor’s federal tax identification number, are: 

Health Diagnostic Laboratory, Inc. (0119), Central Medical Laboratory, LLC (2728), and Integrated Health 

Leaders, LLC (2434)(the “Debtors”). 

Case 17-03846-KRH Doc 4 Filed 07/06/17 Entered 07/06/17 15:51:56 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
LYNN MERCURIO 

223 N. CAUSEWAY 

NEW SMYRNA BEACH, FL 32169 

GREG J. MERCURIO 

403 BOUCHELLE DRIVE, SUITE 108 

NEW SMYRNA BEACH, FL 32169 

 

Under penalty of perjury, I declare that the foregoing is true and correct. 

 July 6, 2017 /s/ Jennifer T. Langley 

 Date Signature 

Print Name: 

Jennifer T. Langley 

Business Address: 

200 Bendix Road, Suite 300, Virginia Beach, VA 23452 

Case 17-03846-KRH Doc 4 Filed 07/06/17 Entered 07/06/17 15:51:56 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2