alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006326EN.01007001.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/70 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/70

---

Action brought on 27 November 2006 — Moreira da Fonseca v OHIM — General Óptica (GENERAL OPTICA)

(Case T-318/06)

(2006/C 326/145)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Alberto Jorge Moreira da Fonseca Lda (Santo Tirso, Portugal) (represented by: M. Oehen Mendes, lawyer)

Applicant:

da

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: General Óptica SA (Barcelona, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 August 2006 notified to the applicant 4 October 2006, in cancellation proceedings No 827C (Case No R 947/2005-1) and consequently declare Community trade mark No 573 592‘GENERAL OPTICA’ filed on 10 July 1997 and registered on 13 September 1999, as invalid, or in the alternative, revoked; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 August 2006 notified to the applicant 4 October 2006, in cancellation proceedings No 827C (Case No R 947/2005-1) and consequently declare Community trade mark No 573 592‘GENERAL OPTICA’ filed on 10 July 1997 and registered on 13 September 1999, as invalid, or in the alternative, revoked;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: The figurative mark ‘GENERAL OPTICA’ for services in class 42 (Opticians' services) — Community trade mark No 573 592

Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: General Óptica SA

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity: The earlier national trade name ‘Generalóptica’ for import and retail sale of optical, precision and photographic apparatus

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejection of the request for a declaration of invalidity

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of among others Article 8(1) and (4) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as there is a likelihood of confusion between the two signs and the applicant's sign is granted national protection.

Pleas in law:

Infringement of Rule 22 of Commission Regulation No 2868/95 as OHIM omitted its duty to ask the applicant to present evidence of the earlier use invoked.

---
### §5407. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 103–451, §8, Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4778, related to regulations. See section 308706 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
# C_2019399EN.01005701.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/57

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2019 — La Caixa v EUIPO — Imagic Vision (imagin bank)

(Case T-761/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark imagin bank - Earlier national figurative mark imagic - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity between the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2019/C 399/70)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Fundación bancaria caixa d’estalvis i pensions de Barcelona La Caixa (Palma de Mallorca, Spain) (represented by: I. Valdelomar Serrano, P. Román Maestre, D. Liern Cendrero, D. Gabarre Armengol and J.L. Rodríguez-Fuensalida, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Imagic Vision, SL (Madrid, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 October 2018 (Case R 1954/2017-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Imagic Vision and Fundación bancaria caixa d’estalvis i pensions de Barcelona La Caixa.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 October 2018 (Case R 1954/2017-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 October 2018 (Case R 1954/2017-4);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and the costs incurred by Fundación bancaria caixa d’estalvis i pensions de Barcelona La Caixa. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and the costs incurred by Fundación bancaria caixa d’estalvis i pensions de Barcelona La Caixa.

---

(1)  OJ C 72, 25.2.2019.

---
#### § 490.603 Applicability.

The performance measures to assess the national freight movement are applicable to the Interstate System.
# Official Journal C 393/29 O

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 393 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6129 October 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 393

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6129 October 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2018/C 393/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — seventh supplement to the 36th complete edition | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2018/C 393/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — seventh supplement to the 36th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4806 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4806

 To amend the Controlled Substances Act to authorize the debarment of 
              certain registrants, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 23, 2019

  Mr. Latta introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
   the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Controlled Substances Act to authorize the debarment of 
              certain registrants, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Debarment Enforcement of Bad Actor 
Registrants Act of 2019'' or the ``DEBAR Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. DEBARMENT OF CERTAIN REGISTRANTS.

    Section 304 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 824) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) The Attorney General may issue an order to prohibit, 
conditionally or unconditionally, and permanently or for such period as 
the Attorney General may determine, any person from being registered 
under this title to manufacture, distribute, or dispense a controlled 
substance or a list I chemical, if the Attorney General finds that--
            ``(1) such person meets or has met any of the conditions 
        for suspension or revocation of registration under subsection 
        (a); and
            ``(2) such person is unfit to manufacture, distribute, or 
        dispense a controlled substance or a list I chemical.''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4789 

To allow Federal law enforcement officers to purchase retired service weapons, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 22, 2019 

Mrs. DEMINGS (for herself, Mr. STEUBE, Mr. SOTO, Mr. BACON, and Mr. 

RUTHERFORD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To allow Federal law enforcement officers to purchase retired 

service weapons, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PURCHASE OF RETIRED HANDGUNS BY FED4 ERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—A Federal law enforcement officer 

6 may purchase a retired handgun from the Federal agency 

7 that issued the handgun to such officer. 

8 (b) LIMITATIONS.—A Federal law enforcement offi9 cer may purchase a retired handgun under subsection (a) 

10 if— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4789 IH

1 (1) the purchase is made during the 6-month 

2 period beginning on the date the handgun was so re3 tired; and 

4 (2) the officer is not prohibited from possessing 

5 or receiving the handgun under the laws of the 

6 United States or the laws of the State, territory, or 

7 possession of the United States in which the officer 

8 resides. 

9 (c) COST.—A handgun purchased under this section 

10 shall be sold at the fair market value for such handgun 

11 taking into account the age and condition of the handgun. 

12 (d) SENSE OF CONGRESS ON USE OF FUNDS.—It is 

13 the sense of Congress that any amounts received by the 

14 Government from the sale of a handgun under this section 

15 should be transferred and used to fund Federal gun safety 

16 programs. 

17 (e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

18 (1) the term ‘‘Federal law enforcement officer’’ 

19 has the meaning given that term in section 

20 115(c)(1) of title 18, United States Code; 

21 (2) the term ‘‘handgun’’ has the meaning given 

22 that term in section 921(a) of title 18, United 

23 States Code; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4789 IH

1 (3) the term ‘‘retired handgun’’ means any 

2 handgun that has been declared surplus by the ap3 plicable agency. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
### p. 1 

# CYTEC®
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC. Legal and Compliance Services Five Garret Mountain Plaza Woodland Park, NJ 07424 Submitted via email (paper copy to follow via courier) 

# RECEiV ED OPPT CBIC 20 th DEC -9 PM 2:149
CBIC 

### Control Number 

# 362944

November 25, 2014 Document Control Office (7407M) Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20460-0001 Attention: Docket No. EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0490

Dear Sir or Madam, On October 1 st , 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a proposed Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for "Certain Nonylphenols and Nonylphenol Ethoxylates". (Reference: Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 190 / Wednesday, October 1, 2014 / Proposed Rules / Pages 59186 — 59195) Cytec respectfully submits the following comments regarding current commercial activities in the USA with CASRN 84852-15-3 (4-nonylphenol, branched). Cytec Industries is a global specialty chemicals and materials company focused on developing, manufacturing and selling value-added products, serving a diverse range of end markets. We use our technology and application development expertise to create chemical and material solutions that are formulated to perform specific and important functions for our customers. Cytec purchases 4-nonylphenol, branched (CASRN 84852-15-3) from domestic suppliers in the USA. This substance is used as an intermediate and as an epoxy cure catalyst, both of which are already identified as existing uses in the proposed SNUR. In addition to these uses, Cytec also uses the 4-nonylphenol, branched as an additive in industrial mining formulations. These mining formulations are specifically used as high-performance copper solvent extractants. The industrial mining formulations containing 4-nonylphenol, branched have been manufactured at a Cytec facility in the USA as early as 1998. As a current and ongoing use of 4-nonylphenol, branched (CASRN 84852-15-3) as an additive in industrial mining formulations, we respectfully request this to be identified as an existing use in the final SNUR publication.

Page 1 of 2

# CYTEE®
CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC. Legal and Compliance Services Five Garret Mountain Plaza Woodland Park, NJ 07424 Please do not hesitate to contact Cytec if you require any additional information concerning our products.
Regards,

Terry McColl 

### Senior Regulatory Compliance Specialist Cytec Industries Legal and Compliance Services Phone: +1-404-388-5320 terry.mccoll@cytec.com 

### p. 

### 2

Page 2 of 2
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

ALVIN D. CLAYTON, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4901 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed January 30, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; John K. Stargel, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard J. Sanders, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and SLEET,, JJ., Concur.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

21–430 WASHINGTON : 2016

114th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 114–157 

COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN 

PICAYUNE STRAND RESTORATION PROJECT 

COMMUNICATION

FROM

THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, 

CIVIL WORKS, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

TRANSMITTING

THE COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN PICAYUNE STRAND RESTORATION PROJECT LIMITED RE-EVALUATION 

REPORT & ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR APRIL 2016 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2016.—Referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure and ordered to be printed 

05:43 Sep 08 2016 Jkt 021430 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HD157PL XXX HD157PL

(III)
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
(1)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 34/2005

of 11 March 2005         

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Chapter XV of Annex II shall be amended as follows:

Article 2

The texts of Directives 2004/9/EC and 2004/10/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 12 March 2005, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 11 March 2005.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Richard WRIGHT            

----

(1)OJ L 133, 26.5.2005, p. 11.

(2)OJ L 50, 20.2.2004, p. 28.

(3)OJ L 50, 20.2.2004, p. 44.

(4)OJ L 145, 11.6.1988, p. 35.

(5)OJ L 15, 17.1.1987, p. 29.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

----
#### § 310.2 Jurisdiction to accept applications for naturalization.

USCIS shall accept an application for naturalization from an applicant who is subject to a continuous residence requirement under section 316(a) or 319(a) of the Act as much as three months before the date upon which the applicant would otherwise satisfy such continuous residence requirement in the State or Service district, as defined in 8 CFR 316.1, where residence is to be established for naturalization purposes. At the time of examination on the application, the applicant will be required to prove that he or she satisfies the residence requirements for the residence reflected in the application.

[56 FR 50480, Oct. 7, 1991, as amended at 76 FR 53797, Aug. 29, 2011]
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.13

                               FURNITURE.COM, INC.
                                40 Jackson Street
                               Worcester, MA 01608

                                                                   May 13, 1999

VIA REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL
--------------------------------
Steven Rothschild
4 Lantern Lane
Worcester, MA  01609

Dear Steve:

         As we agreed, it is necessary to terminate your employment with
Furniture.com, Inc. (the "Company") so that the employment period does not
extend for an additional year. Accordingly, please be advised that the Company
hereby elects to terminate your employment pursuant to Section 4.1 of your
Employment Agreement, dated June 19, 1998, as amended by Amendment No. 1, dated
December 29, 1998.

         In accordance with Section 4.1 of the amended Employment Agreement, the
Company is required to give you thirty (30) days notice of such termination.
This letter shall serve as the notification of your termination required by
Section 4.1 of the Agreement.

         The Company wishes to remind you of your obligations under Section 6
(Non-Compete and Non-Solicitation) and Section 7 (Proprietary Information and
Developments) of the Employment Agreement and Section 4 (Notification of
Competitive Activity) of Amendment No. 1. Your non-compete and non-solicitation
obligations shall continue through June 19, 2002 (the last date of the defined
"Employment Period" plus one (1) year).

         If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not
hesitate to contact me.

                                         Very truly yours,

                                         Furniture.com, Inc.

                                         /s/ Andrew Brooks
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Andrew Brooks,
                                         President and Chief
                                         Executive Officer
#### § 100.6 [Reserved]
# C_2022284EN.01002902.xml

| 25.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 June 2022 — Aquino v Parliament

(Case T-253/21) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Staff Committee of the Parliament - Election of the president of the Staff Committee - Annulment of the election - Liability)

(2022/C 284/36)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Roberto Aquino (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Bukšek Tomac, R. Ignătescu and T. Lazian, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment (i) of the decision of the European Parliament of 7 July 2020, by which that institution annulled his election as president of the Staff Committee of the Parliament (‘the SC’), and, (ii), in essence, of the constituent meeting of the SC of 14 September 2020, in particular as regards the election of its president, and, second, compensation for the damage which he allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Roberto Aquino to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Roberto Aquino to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 28.6.2021.

---