15244 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 54 / Monday, March 21, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

Office of Public Affairs* 

Office of the Solicitor General 

Requests for records from case files must 

include the case name, docket number or 

citation to case. 

Office on Violence Against Women 

Professional Responsibility Advisory Office, 

Information Management Specialist 

Tax Division, Division Counsel for FOIA and 

PA Matters 

Requests for records from case files must 

include the case caption or name, civil 

action number, and judicial district. 

United States Marshals Service, Office of the 

General Counsel 

Requests for records pertaining to 

individuals must include the judicial 

district. Requests for records related to 

prisoner transportation must include the 

date and trip number. Requests for 

records concerning seized property must 

specify the judicial district, civil action 

number, asset identification number, or 

an accurate description of the property. 

United States Parole Commission, FOIA/PA 

Specialist 

Dated: March 14, 2011. 

Eric H. Holder, Jr., 

Attorney General. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6473 Filed 3–18–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–BE–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 100 

[Docket No. USCG–2011–0126] 

RIN 1625–AA08 

Special Local Regulations for Marine 

Events; Chester River, Chestertown, 

MD 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

establish special local regulations 

during the reenactment portion of the 

‘‘Chestertown Tea Party Festival’’, a 

marine event to be held on the waters 

of the Chester River, Chestertown, 

Maryland. These special local 

regulations are necessary to provide for 

the safety of life on navigable waters 

during the event. This action is 

intended to temporarily restrict vessel 

traffic in a portion of the Chester River 

during the event. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be received by the Coast Guard on 

or before April 20, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2011–0126 using any one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail 

address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The telephone number 

is 202–366–9329. 

To avoid duplication, please use only 

one of these four methods. See the 

‘‘Public Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call or e-mail Mr. Ronald Houck, 

U.S. Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, MD; 

telephone 410–576–2674, e-mail 

Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. If you have 

questions on viewing or submitting 

material to the docket, call Renee V. 

Wright, Program Manager, Docket 

Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–2011–0126), 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online (via http:// 

www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment online via http:// 

www.regulations.gov, it will be 

considered received by the Coast Guard 

when you successfully transmit the 

comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or 

mail your comment, it will be 

considered as having been received by 

the Coast Guard when it is received at 

the Docket Management Facility. We 

recommend that you include your name 

and a mailing address, an e-mail 

address, or a telephone number in the 

body of your document so that we can 

contact you if we have questions 

regarding your submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will 

then become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu 

select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert 

‘‘USCG–2010–0126’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’ 

box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the 

balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column. 

If you submit your comments by mail or 

hand delivery, submit them in an 

unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 

11 inches, suitable for copying and 

electronic filing. If you submit 

comments by mail and would like to 

know that they reached the Facility, 

please enclose a stamped, self-addressed 

postcard or envelope. We will consider 

all comments and material received 

during the comment period and may 

change the rule based on your 

comments. 

Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then 

become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2011– 

0126’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the 

‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’ 

column. You may also visit the Docket 

Management Facility in Room W12–140 

on the ground floor of the Department 

of Transportation West Building, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, 

DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. We have an agreement with 

the Department of Transportation to use 

the Docket Management Facility. 

Privacy Act 

Anyone can search the electronic 

form of comments received into any of 

our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review a Privacy 

Act notice regarding our public dockets 

in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 

Federal Register (73 FR 3316). 

Public Meeting 

We do not now plan to hold a public 

meeting. But you may submit a request 

for one using one of the four methods 

specified under ADDRESSES. Please 

explain why you believe a public 

meeting would be beneficial. If we 

determine that one would aid this 

rulemaking, we will hold one at a time 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 54 / Monday, March 21, 2011 / Proposed Rules 15245 

and place announced by a later notice 

in the Federal Register. 

Background and Purpose 

On May 28, 2011, the Chestertown 

Tea Party Festival will sponsor a 

reenactment in the Chester River at 

Chestertown, Maryland. The key 

component of the event consists of the 

Schooner SULTANA departing from its 

berth in Chestertown, transiting 200 

yards to an anchorage location, 

embarking and disembarking Tea Party 

actors by dinghy, and then returning to 

its berth. Due to the need for vessel 

control during the event, the Coast 

Guard will temporarily restrict vessel 

traffic in the event area to provide for 

the safety of participants, spectators and 

other transiting vessels. 

Discussion of Proposed Rule 

The Coast Guard proposes to establish 

temporary special local regulations on 

specified waters of the Chester River, 

Chestertown, MD. The regulations will 

be in effect from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. on 

May 28, 2011. The regulated area, 

approximately 350 yards in length and 

150 yards in width, includes all waters 

of the Chester River, within a line 

connecting the following positions: 

latitude 39°12′27′′ N, longitude 

076°03′46′′ W; thence to latitude 

39°12′19′′ N, longitude 076°03′53′′ W; 

thence to latitude 39°12′25′′ N, 

longitude 076°03′41′′ W; thence to 

latitude 39°12′16′′ N, longitude 

076°03′48′′ W; thence to the point of 

origin at latitude 39°12′27′′ N, longitude 

076°03′46′′ W. The effect of this 

proposed rule will be to restrict general 

navigation in the regulated area during 

the event. Except for persons or vessels 

authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol 

Commander or designated 

representative, no person or vessel may 

enter or remain in the regulated area. 

Spectator vessels will be allowed to 

view the event from outside the 

regulated area, but may not block the 

navigable channel. Other vessels 

intending to transit the Chester River 

will be allowed to safely transit around 

the regulated area. These regulations are 

needed to control vessel traffic during 

the event to enhance the safety of 

participants, spectators and transiting 

vessels. 

Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this proposed rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on 13 of these statutes or 

executive orders. 

Regulatory Planning and Review 

This proposed rule is not a significant 

regulatory action under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review, and does not 

require an assessment of potential costs 

and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that 

Order. The Office of Management and 

Budget has not reviewed it under that 

Order. 

We expect the economic impact of 

this proposed rule to be so minimal that 

a full Regulatory Evaluation under the 

regulatory policies and procedures of 

DHS is unnecessary. Although this 

regulation will prevent traffic from 

transiting a portion of the Chester River 

during the event, the effect of this 

regulation will not be significant due to 

the limited duration that the regulated 

area will be in effect and the extensive 

advance notifications that will be made 

to the maritime community via the 

Local Notice to Mariners and marine 

information broadcasts, so mariners can 

adjust their plans accordingly. 

Additionally, the regulated area has 

been narrowly tailored to impose the 

least impact on general navigation yet 

provide the level of safety deemed 

necessary. Vessel traffic will be able to 

transit safely around the regulated area. 

Small Entities 

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

whether this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises 

small businesses, not-for-profit 

organizations that are independently 

owned and operated and are not 

dominant in their fields, and 

governmental jurisdictions with 

populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule 

would not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities. This proposed rule would affect 

the following entities, some of which 

might be small entities: the owners or 

operators of vessels intending to transit 

or anchor in the effected portions of the 

Chester River during the event. 

Although this regulation prevents 

traffic from transiting a portion of the 

Chester River at Chestertown, MD 

during the event, this proposed rule will 

not have a significant economic impact 

on a substantial number of small entities 

for the following reasons. This proposed 

rule would be in effect for only a limited 

period. The regulated area is of limited 

size. Vessel traffic will be able to transit 

safely around the regulated area. Before 

the enforcement period, we will issue 

maritime advisories so mariners can 

adjust their plans accordingly. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this rule would have a 

significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this rule would economically affect it. 

Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this proposed rule so that 

they can better evaluate its effects on 

them and participate in the rulemaking. 

If the rule would affect your small 

business, organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact Coast Guard 

Sector Baltimore, MD. The Coast Guard 

will not retaliate against small entities 

that question or complain about this 

proposed rule or any policy or action of 

the Coast Guard. 

Collection of Information 

This proposed rule would call for no 

new collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on State or local governments and 

would either preempt State law or 

impose a substantial direct cost of 

compliance on them. We have analyzed 

this proposed rule under that Order and 

have determined that it does not have 

implications for federalism. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 or more in any one year. 

Though this proposed rule would not 

result in such an expenditure, we do 

discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 

in this preamble. 

Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule would not effect a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS

15246 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 54 / Monday, March 21, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This rule is not an economically 

significant rule and would not create an 

environmental risk to health or risk to 

safety that might disproportionately 

affect children. 

Indian Tribal Governments 

This proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments, because it would not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 023–01 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD, which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions which do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. This proposed 

rule involves implementation of 

regulations within 33 CFR part 100 

applicable to organized marine events 

on the navigable waters of the United 

States that could negatively impact the 

safety of waterway users and shore side 

activities in the event area. The category 

of water activities includes but is not 

limited to sail boat regattas, boat 

parades, power boat racing, swimming 

events, crew racing, canoe and sail 

board racing. We seek any comments or 

information that may lead to the 

discovery of a significant environmental 

impact from this proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100 

Marine safety, Navigation (water), 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows: 

PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON 

NAVIGABLE WATERS 

1. The authority citation for part 100 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233. 

2. Add a temporary section, § 100.35– 

T05–0126 to read as follows: 

§ 100.35–T05–0126 Special Local 

Regulations for Marine Events; Chester 

River, Chestertown, MD. 

(a) Regulated area. The following 

locations are regulated areas: All waters 

of the Chester River, within a line 

connecting the following positions: 

latitude 39°12′27′′ N, longitude 

076°03′46′′ W; thence to latitude 

39°12′19′′ N, longitude 076°03′53′′ W; 

thence to latitude 39°12′25′′ N, 

longitude 076°03′41′′ W; thence to 

latitude 39°12′16′′ N, longitude 

076°03′48′′ W; thence to the point of 

origin at latitude 39°12′27′′ N, longitude 

076°03′46′′ W, located at Chestertown, 

Maryland. All coordinates reference 

Datum NAD 1983. 

(b) Definitions. 

(1) Coast Guard Patrol Commander 

means a commissioned, warrant, or 

petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard 

who has been designated by the 

Commander, Coast Guard Sector 

Baltimore. 

(2) Official Patrol means any vessel 

assigned or approved by Commander, 

Coast Guard Sector Baltimore with a 

commissioned, warrant, or petty officer 

on board and displaying a Coast Guard 

ensign. 

(c) Special local regulations. 

(1) Except for persons or vessels 

authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol 

Commander, no person or vessel may 

enter or remain in the regulated area. 

(2) The operator of any vessel in the 

regulated area must: 

(i) Stop the vessel immediately when 

directed to do so by the Coast Guard 

Patrol Commander or any Official 

Patrol. 

(ii) Proceed as directed by the Coast 

Guard Patrol Commander or any Official 

Patrol. 

(d) Enforcement period. This section 

will be enforced from 10 a.m. until 5 

p.m. on May 28, 2011. 

(1) The Coast Guard will publish a 

notice in the Fifth Coast Guard District 

Local Notice to Mariners and issue 

marine information broadcast on VHF– 

FM marine band radio announcing 

specific event date and times. 

(2) [Reserved] 

Dated: March 4, 2011. 

Mark P. O’Malley, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Baltimore, Maryland. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6588 Filed 3–18–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 110 

[Docket No. USCG–2009–1131] 

RIN 1625–AA01 

Anchorage Regulations; Narragansett 

Bay and Rhode Island Sound, RI 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

remove an obsolete Naval explosives 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS