alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Inflation Control

              																	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking and Currency, 1865-1974					 and 	Eightieth Congress, 1947-1949. 						*Inflation Control : Hearing Before the Committee on Banking and Currency, House of Representatives, Eightieth Congress, Second Session, on S.J. Res. 157, July 29, 30, August 2, 3, and 4, 1948*,												Washington: 								Government Printing Office, 										July 29, 30, August 2, 3, and 4, 1948,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/744,			accessed on September 20, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### § 101.4 Suspension of rules.

Upon notice to all parties, the reviewing authority or the presiding officer, with respect to matters pending before them, may modify or waive any rule in this part upon determination that no party will be unduly prejudiced and the ends of justice will thereby be served.
# Official Journal C 10A/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.010.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 10A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5512 January 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.010.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 10A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5512 January 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2012/C 010A/01 | Information Society and Media DG — Publication of a vacancy for a Director function (Grade AD 14), in Brussels (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2011/10322 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2012/C 010A/01

Information Society and Media DG — Publication of a vacancy for a Director function (Grade AD 14), in Brussels (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2011/10322

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 8 | (DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 | |

8

(DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL)

10

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
ÐÏ•à¡±
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of GreenShift
Corporation (the "Company"), certifies that:

1.   The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter  ended
     June 30,  2005 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
     Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





                    /S/      KEVIN KREISLER
                    -----------------------
By:                          KEVIN KREISLER
                             Chief Executive Officer
Date:                        August 18, 2005


                    /S/      JAMES GRAINER
                    ----------------------
By:                          JAMES GRAINER
                             Chief Financial Officer
Date:                        August 18, 2005

This  certification  is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,
subject  to the  knowledge  standard  contained  therein,  and not for any other
purpose.
```

Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-QSB Quarterly Report of Liska Biometry, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     o    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     o    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

May 27, 2003

/s/ Lam Ko Chau

By: Lam Ko Chau, President (Principal Executive Officer), Principal Financial
Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Secretary, Chairman of the Board
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement of Illinois Power
Company and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the balance sheet,
income statement and cash flow statement of Illinois Power Company.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                         4664
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                         16
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             393
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                           494
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5567
<COMMON>                                          1348
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                130
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                    1478
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               97
<PREFERRED>                                        126
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                              1677
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                 131
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                     229
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       62
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                         62
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    33
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                    1672
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                     5567
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                         1641
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               126
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                        1191
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                        1317
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            324
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   1
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     325
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           142
<NET-INCOME>                                       183
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         24
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      156
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                            77
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                          126
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             474
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### §7004. United States representation on joint technical committee

#### (a) Scientific experts

#### (1) In general

The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall appoint no more than 2 individuals to serve as scientific experts on the joint technical committee, at least 1 of whom shall be an official of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

#### (2) Term of office

An individual appointed under paragraph (1) shall be appointed for a term of not to exceed 4 years, but shall be eligible for reappointment. An individual appointed to fill a vacancy occurring prior to the expiration of the term of office of that individual's predecessor shall be appointed for the remainder of that term.

#### (b) Independent member

In addition to individuals appointed under subsection (a), the Secretary, jointly with the Government of Canada, shall appoint 1 independent member to the joint technical committee selected from a list of names provided by the advisory panel.

(Pub. L. 109–479, title VI, §605, Jan. 12, 2007, 120 Stat. 3646; Pub. L. 111–348, title III, §302(a), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3672.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2011—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 111–348 substituted "no more than 2" for "at least 6 but not more than 12".
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

August 24, 2021

In the Matter of

EV CHARGING USA, INC.,

File No. 500-1

ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF

TRADING

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of EV CHARGING USA, 

INC. (“EVUS1”) (CIK No. 1083383), a merged Nevada corporation located in Chicago, IL with 

a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

("Exchange Act") Section 12(g) because it is delinquent in its periodic filings with the 

Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period 

ended September 30, 2015. On July 2, 2021, the Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance 

(“Corporation Finance”) sent a delinquency letter to EVUS requesting compliance with its 

periodic filing requirements, which was delivered. As of July 28, 2021, the common stock of 

EVUS was quoted on OTC Link operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. (formerly “Pink Sheets”) 

(“OTC Link”), had six market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of 

Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3). 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors 

require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is 

ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the 

 

1 The short form of each issuer’s name is also its stock symbol.
2

securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on 

August 25, 2021, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 8, 2021.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
Sta sertu me-l ta kubri bu nariz y boka pa djuda proteji otus.

Bu pode sta infetadu y ka ten nun sintomas.

Y uza un Panu pa Kubri Rostu

Fika 6 pe (distánsia di 2 brasu) di otu algen.

Pratika Distansiamentu Sosial

Djuda Proteji bu Kabésa y Otus di COVID-19

317297-M
130 STAT. 974 PUBLIC LAW 114–240—OCT. 7, 2016 

Public Law 114–240 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to encourage the nationwide observance 

of two minutes of silence each Veterans Day. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Day Moment of Silence 

Act’’. 

SEC. 2. OBSERVANCE OF VETERANS DAY. 

(a) TWO MINUTES OF SILENCE.—Chapter 1 of title 36, United 

States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

section: 

‘‘§ 145. Veterans Day 

‘‘The President shall issue each year a proclamation calling 

on the people of the United States to observe two minutes of 

silence on Veterans Day in honor of the service and sacrifice of 

veterans throughout the history of the Nation, beginning at— 

‘‘(1) 3:11 p.m. Atlantic standard time; 

‘‘(2) 2:11 p.m. eastern standard time; 

‘‘(3) 1:11 p.m. central standard time; 

‘‘(4) 12:11 p.m. mountain standard time; 

‘‘(5) 11:11 a.m. Pacific standard time; 

‘‘(6) 10:11 a.m. Alaska standard time; and 

‘‘(7) 9:11 a.m. Hawaii-Aleutian standard time.’’. 

President. 

Proclamation. 

36 USC 145. 

36 USC 101 note. 

Veterans Day 

Moment of 

Silence Act. 

Oct. 7, 2016 

[S. 1004] 


kgrant on DSKB33CYQ1 with PUBLAW
PUBLIC LAW 114–240—OCT. 7, 2016 130 STAT. 975 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1004: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 161 (2015): Nov. 9, considered and passed Senate. 

Vol. 162 (2016): Sept. 27, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections for chapter 

1 of title 36, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

end the following new item: 

‘‘145. Veterans Day.’’. 

Approved October 7, 2016. 


kgrant on DSKB33CYQ1 with PUBLAW
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markm an

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis,

Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 2, 2010 

# Order

November 2, 2010

140603 (55)(56)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 140603

v COA: 287689

Ingham CC: 08

- 000249

- FH

RANDALL LEE DOWDY,

Defendant

- Appellee.

____________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by Jane Poe and others for leave to

participate in oral argument is considered and it is DENIED.
#### § 500.201 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to set forth requirements for development, establishment, implementation, and continued operation of a traffic monitoring system for highways and public transportation facilities and equipment (TMS) in each State in accordance with the provisions of 23 U.S.C. 303 and subpart A of this part.
B 210A (Form 210A) (12/09) 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

RICHMOND DIVISION 

IN RE: 

HAYWOOD L DABNEY AND 

DARSHAE L DABNEY 

DEBTORS 

CASE NO. 17-32589-KLP 

CHAPTER 13 

TRANSFER OF CLAIM OTHER THAN FOR SECURITY 

A CLAIM HAS BEEN FILED IN THIS CASE or deemed filed under 11 U.S.C. § 1111(a). Transferee hereby 

gives evidence and notice pursuant to Rule 3001 (e)(2), Fed. R. Bankr. P., of the transfer, other than for security, 

of the claim referenced in this evidence and notice. 

BSI Financial Services Statebridge Company, LLC 

Name of Transferee Name of Transferor 

Name and Address where notices of transferee should 

be sent: 

BSI Financial Services 

1425 Greenway Drive 

Suite 400 

Irving, TX 75038 

Court Claim # (if known): 14 

Amount of Claim: $203,763.54 

Date Claim Filed: July 27, 2017 

Phone: 1-800-327-7861 

Last Four Digits of Acct #: 0734 

Last Four Digits of Acct#: 0734 

 

Name and Address where transferee payments should be sent (if different from above): 

BSI Financial Services 

314 S Franklin St. P.O. Box 517 

Titusville, PA 16354 

Phone: 1-800-327-7861 

Last Four Digits of Acct #: 0734 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the information provided in this notice is true and correct to the best of 

my knowledge and belief. 

By: s/ M. Christine Maggard Date: October 12, 2020 

Transferee/Transferee’s Agent 

Penalty for making a false statement: Fine of up to $500,000.00 or imprisonment for up to 5 years or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 & 3571. 

Case 17-32589-KLP Doc 53 Filed 10/12/20 Entered 10/12/20 14:17:01 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

RICHMOND DIVISION 

IN RE: 

HAYWOOD L DABNEY AND 

DARSHAE L DABNEY 

DEBTORS 

CASE NO. 17-32589-KLP 

CHAPTER 13 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that a true and exact copy of the foregoing Transfer Of 

Claim Other Than For Security has been electronically served or mailed, postage prepaid on October 

12, 2020 to the following: 

HAYWOOD L DABNEY 

1612 CEDAR GROVE TER 

HENRICO, VA 23228 

DARSHAE L DABNEY 

1612 CEDAR GROVE TER 

HENRICO, VA 23228 

Richard C. Pecoraro, Debtor's Attorney 

1700 Huguenot Rd. 

Suite B4 

Midlothian, VA 23113 

rich@richlawrva.com 

Suzanne E. Wade, Bankruptcy Trustee 

7202 Glen Forest Drive, Ste. 202 

Richmond, VA 23226 

/s/ M. Christine Maggard 

M. Christine Maggard 

(Bar No. 33824) 

Attorney for Creditor 

BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC 

8757 Red Oak Blvd., Suite 150 

Charlotte, NC 28217 

Telephone: 757-213-2959 x4538 

Facsimile: 704-369-0760 

E-Mail: christine.maggard@brockandscott.com 

Case 17-32589-KLP Doc 53 Filed 10/12/20 Entered 10/12/20 14:17:01 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
1 The Honorable Dean Whipple, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-3779

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Adrian Davis, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: October 7, 2009 Filed: November 4, 2009

___________ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In this direct criminal appeal, Adrian Davis challenges the district court’s 1 judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of conspiring to distribute more than 50 grams of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(iii) and 846; distributing cocaine base on one occasion, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C); and distributing in excess of 5 grams of cocaine base on three separate occasions, all in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(iii). Davis’s counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967),-2- challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and seeking pe rmission to withdraw. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

Davis was tried in June 2007 with codefendants Joseph Rainey and Marvin Anthony. The evidence included the testimony of three other cooperating codefendants who admitted thei r own participation and that of their cohorts in the purchasing and selling of cocaine base over an extended period of time. The evidence also included the testimony of a number of law enforcement officials who had conducted surveillance, made controlled buys, and analyzed the substances that were bought or seized. This evidence, along with the parties’ stipulations that various quantities of cocaine base had been purch ased or seized on various dates between 2004 and 2006, established that (1) there was a conspiracy or an agreement to distribute cocaine base, (2) Davis knew of the agreement, and (3) he intentionally joined the conspiracy. It also amply supported Davis’s convictions for distributing cocaine base on the dates charges in the indictment. SeeUnited States v. Hernandez , 569 F.3d 893, 896 (8th Cir. 2009) (elements of conspiracy and distribution offenses); United States v. Molsbarger , 551 F.3d 809, 812 (8th Cir.) (s tandard of review; verdict will be upheld if there is any interpretati on of evidence that c ould lead reasonableminded jury to find defendant guilty beyond reasonable doubt), cert. denied , 129 S. Ct. 2168 (2009). We therefore conclude that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict.
Following our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), including Davis’s citation under Fed. R. Civ. P. 28(j), we have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw on condition that counsel inform Davis about the procedures for filing petitions for rehear ing and for certiorari, and we deny Davis’s pro se motion for newly appointed counsel.

______________________________
### Economic geology of the Plant City quadrangle, Florida

By: James Bachelder Cathcart

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1142D

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### §698u–4. Limited authority to acquire

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall acquire, by donation, not more than 180 acres of real property within the boundaries of the Preserve (as described in section 698u–2(b) of this title) and the improvements on the real property.

#### (b) Payments in lieu of taxes

For the purposes of payments made under chapter 69 of title 31, the real property described in subsection (a) shall be deemed to have been acquired for the purposes specified in section 6904(a) of that title.

#### (c) Prohibitions

No property may be acquired under this section without the consent of the owner of the property. The United States may not acquire fee ownership of any lands within the Preserve other than lands described in this section.

(Pub. L. 104–333, div. I, title X, §1006, Nov. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 4208; Pub. L. 108–352, §17, Oct. 21, 2004, 118 Stat. 1398.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 108–352 substituted "subsection (a)" for "subsection (a)(1)".