alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 292/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.292.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 292 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5520 October 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.292.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 292

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5520 October 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | | 2012/639/EU |
| | * | Decision of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council of 7 June 2012 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, and provisional application of the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States and the Republic of Moldova | 1 |
| Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States and the Republic of Moldova | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

2012/639/EU

*

Decision of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council of 7 June 2012 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, and provisional application of the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States and the Republic of Moldova

1

Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States and the Republic of Moldova

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-3270

_____________________________

DECARLO ANTUANN MITCHELL,

II, 

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jan Shackelford, Judge.

May 16, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, RAY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Laurel Cornell Niles, 

Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Daniel Krumbholz, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
# Official Journal C 327/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 327 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6530 August 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 327

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6530 August 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 327/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10341 – PRINCE / FERRO) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2022/C 327/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10301 – CVC / ETHNIKI) (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2022/C 327/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10814 – HEDIN / MOTOR-CAR) (
  1
  ) | 3 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 327/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10341 – PRINCE / FERRO) (
  1
  )

1

1

2022/C 327/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10301 – CVC / ETHNIKI) (
  1
  )

1

2

2022/C 327/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10814 – HEDIN / MOTOR-CAR) (
  1
  )

1

3

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 327/04 | Euro exchange rates — 29 August 2022 | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 327/04

Euro exchange rates — 29 August 2022

4

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 327/05 | Publication of an application for approval of an amendment, which is not minor, to a product specification pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 5 |
| 2022/C 327/06 | Publication of an application for approval of an amendment, which is not minor, to a product specification pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 20 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2022/C 327/05

Publication of an application for approval of an amendment, which is not minor, to a product specification pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

5

2022/C 327/06

Publication of an application for approval of an amendment, which is not minor, to a product specification pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

20

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Mary E. Morris et al., Defendants in Error, v. Thomas Kerrigan, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 15,166.

*Evidence-—when proof of rental value incompetent.*A definite contract having been established as to the amount to be paid for the use of real property, proof of its fair rental value is properly rejected.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William W. Maxwell, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1909.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 24, 1911.

Benjamin F. J. O’Dell, for plaintiff in error.

Boyle, Mott *&*Haight, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Baldwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case is brought before us upon writ of error to review the judgment of the Municipal Court of Chicago, entered against plaintiff in error (Kerrigan) on October 6, 1908, for the possession of certain real estate. The trial below was before a jury, but the court directed the verdict.

It appears that the parties entered into a contract on the 27th of July, 1907, for the purchase, by Kerrigan, of premises known as 6611 Justine street, Chicago, for which he was to pay (in addition to specified previous payments) the sum of $2,000 in monthly payments of $35 each—together with taxes and assessments.

The property in question was a two story flat building with a basement, in the nature of a cellar, without cement floor. At the time possession was delivered to Kerrigan under his contract (about August 7, 1907), one of the defendants in error (Morris) used the basement as a storage place—possession of the flats being then delivered to Kerrigan.

*511In September, 1908, defendants in error sued for the possession of the premises upon the ground that Kerrigan had defaulted to the extent of $150 in the monthly ¡payments and the taxes, to be paid by him under the terms of the contract.

On the trial below Morris testified that it had been agreed between him and Kerrigan that Kerrigan should be allowed upon his contract the sum of one dollar per month for the use of the basement for storage purposes, and this testimony was not contradicted by any one.

Plaintiff in error contends that the trial court erred in refusing to allow him to prove the fair rental value of the basement, and to show that his (Kerrigan’s) consequent damages resulting from the continued occupancy of the basement by defendants in error, aggregated more than the amount due from him under the contract.

It having been established by uncontradicted evidence in the case, that a definite price of one dollar per month had been agreed upon, the court below did not err in refusing to allow Kerrigan to prove the fair rental value for the use and occupation of the basement, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RICHARD F. JOYCE,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES and

GUARDIAN AD LITEM,

Appellees.

No. 4D20-922

[August 17, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Carolyn Bell, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502019DP0000129XXXXMB (JK).

Richard F. Joyce of the Law Office of Richard F. Joyce, P.A., Miami, 

and Kevin Coyle Colbert, Miami, for appellant.

Andrew Feigenbaum of Children's Legal Services, West Palm Beach, 

for appellee Department of Children & Families. 

Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director, and Samantha C. Valley, 

Senior Attorney, Tallahassee, for appellee Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, KLINGENSMITH and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-02-15T01:39:00-0500
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
### §688. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–625, title III, §314(g), Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3483

Section, acts July 3, 1926, ch. 744, §6, 44 Stat. 821; June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §13, 62 Stat. 861, related to designation of Sequoia National Game Refuge. See section 45f(b)(2) of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 95–625, title III, §314(g), Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3483, provided in part that the repeal of this section and section 45a–3 of this title is effective upon the transfer of abolished Sequoia National Game Refuge by the Secretary of Agriculture to the administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior under section 45f(b)(2) of this title.

#### Wild Animal Protection

Pub. L. 95–625, title III, §314(g), Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3483, provided in part that repeal of this section should not be construed to prohibit or prevent the Secretary of the Interior from exercising any authority applicable to the national parks respecting protection of birds, game, or other wild animals.
### §558a. Volunteers in the National Forests Program

The Secretary of Agriculture (hereinafter referred to as the "Secretary") is authorized to recruit, train, and accept without regard to the civil service 1 classification laws, rules, or regulations the services of individuals without compensation as volunteers for or in aid of interpretive functions, visitor services, conservation measures and development, or other activities in and related to areas administered by the Secretary through the Forest Service. In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall consider referrals of prospective volunteers made by the Corporation for National and Community Service.

(Pub. L. 92–300, §1, May 18, 1972, 86 Stat. 147; Pub. L. 103–82, title IV, §405(d), Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 921.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1993—Pub. L. 103–82 substituted "the Corporation for National and Community Service" for "ACTION".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1993 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–82 effective Apr. 4, 1994, see section 406(b) of Pub. L. 103–82, set out as a note under section 8332 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 92–300, §5, May 18, 1972, 86 Stat. 147, provided that: "This Act [enacting this section and sections 558b to 558d of this title] may be cited as the 'Volunteers in the National Forests Act of 1972'."

1 So in original. The word "and" probably should appear after "civil service".
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned, Yuhua Yang, the Chief Financial Officer of TEC Technology, Inc.
(the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 16thday of August, 2010.

/s/ Yuhua
YangYuhua YangChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial
andAccounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to TEC Technology, Inc. and will be retained by TEC
Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
### §715p. Cooperation of State in enforcement of provisions

When any State shall, by suitable legislation, make provision adequately to enforce the provisions of this subchapter and all regulations promulgated thereunder, the Secretary of the Interior may so certify, and then and thereafter said State may cooperate with the Secretary of the Interior in the enforcement of this subchapter and the regulations thereunder.

(Feb. 18, 1929, ch. 257, §17, 45 Stat. 1225; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. II, §4(f), eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2731, 53 Stat. 1433.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Transfer of functions of Secretary of Agriculture to Secretary of the Interior by Reorg. Plan No. II of 1939, see Transfer of Functions note set out under section 715a of this title.
#### § 751.3 Applicability.

The provisions of this part are applicable to all areas within 1,000 feet of the nearest edge of the right-of-way and visible from the main traveled way of all Federal-aid Primary and Interstate Systems regardless of whether Federal funds participated in the construction thereof, including toll sections of such highways. This part does not apply to the Urban System.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 58 (Friday, March 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 16852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7058]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Public Notice for Waiver of Aeronautical Land-Use Assurance; Marv 
Skie-Lincoln County Airport; Tea, SD

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent of waiver with respect to land.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is considering a 
proposal to authorize the release of 1.109 acres of the airport 
property at the Marv Skie-Lincoln County Airport, Tea, South Dakota. 
The proposal consists of the trade of unimproved land on the east side 
of the airport owned by the County of Lincoln for an equal parcel of 
land located on the west side of the airport.
    The acreage being released is not needed for aeronautical use as 
currently identified on the Airport Layout Plan. There are no impacts 
to the airport by allowing the County to trade properties. Approval 
does not constitute a commitment by the FAA to financially assist in 
the disposal of the airport property nor a determination of eligibility 
for grant-in-aid funding from the FAA.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 25, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Mr. David P. Anderson, Program Manager, Bismarck Airports 
District Office, 2301 University Drive, Building 23B, Bismarck, North 
Dakota, 58504.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David P. Anderson, Program 
Manager, Bismarck Airports District Office, 2301 University Drive, 
Building 23B, Bismarck, North Dakota. Telephone Number (701) 323-7380/
FAX Number (701) 323-7399. Documents reflecting this FAA action may be 
reviewed at this same location or at the Lincoln County States 
Attorneys Office, 104 North Main Street, Suite 200, Canton, South 
Dakota.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Following is a description of the subject 
airport property to be released at the Marv Skie-Lincoln County 
Airport.
    This property for release is for a land trade at the Marv Skie-
Lincoln County Airport owned by the County of Lincoln, South Dakota. 
The property for release was originally acquired under Airport 
Improvement Program grant number 3-46-0078-001-1988. This 1.109 acres 
is located in Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 30, 
Township 100 North, Range 50 West of the 5th Principle Meridian.
    Said parcel subject to all easements, restrictions, and 
reservations of record.

    Issued in Bismarck, North Dakota, on February 28, 2011.
Thomas T. Schauer,
Manager, Bismarck Airports District Office, FAA, Great Lakes Region.
[FR Doc. 2011-7058 Filed 3-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
§ 661.15 What are the eligible activities for TTFBP funds? TTFBP funds can be used: ( a ) To carry out any planning (including safety inspection of in-service bridges), design, engineering, preconstruction, construction, and construction inspection of new or replacement TTF bridges;
( b ) To replace, rehabilitate, seismically retrofit, paint, apply calcium magnesium acetate, sodium acetate/formate, or other environmentally acceptable, minimally corrosive anti-icing and deicing composition;
( c ) To implement countermeasures, including scour countermeasures, for TTF bridges classified as scour critical or in poor condition, having a low load capacity, or needing geometric improvements, including multiple-pipe culverts; or
( d ) To demolish the old bridge if a bridge is replaced under the TTFBP.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Joseph R. Swan and Others, Composing the Firm of Swan, Beardsley & Moore, Respondents, for an Order Directing Lawrence E Brown, as Committee, etc., of Augusta Hyatt, an Incompetent Person, and the Union Trust Company, as Receiver, etc., to Pay the Amount of a Certain Bill. I. Townsend Burden, Jr., as Temporary Administrator, etc., and George Hyatt Robinson, Appellants.

Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs. No opinion. Order to be settled on notice. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
Searched for **http://www.globalchange.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.globalchange.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Exhibit 23.  Consent of Experts and Counsel





                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Helix Technology Corporation:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
of Helix Technology Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 2-83974) of our
reports dated January 26, 1996, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedules of Helix Technology Corporation
as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and for the years ended December 31, 1995,
1994 and 1993, which reports are included in this Annual Report on 
Form 10-K.





                                         COOPERS & LYBRAND L. L. P.
                                         (Signature)


Boston, Massachusetts
February 7, 1996
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and 

activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, 

marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, 

political beliefs, reprisal, or because of all or part of an individual‘s income is derived from any 

public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with 

disabilities who require alternative means of communication of program information (Braille, large 

print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA‘s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). 

To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence 

Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 79503272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 

(TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Printed on recycled paper –April 2011
EXHIBIT 4.2

                         FORM OF STOCK AWARD TAX NOTICE


<PAGE>



         TAX ISSUES RELATED TO EXERCISE OF STOCK OPTIONS


         This   memorandum   reviews  the  tax  effects  upon  the  exercise  of
"Non-Incentive Stock Options" ("NSOs").

         Upon the  exercise of an NSO, the amount by which the fair market value
of the shares on the date of exercise  exceeds the exercise  price will be taxed
to the optionee as ordinary income.  The Company will be entitled to a deduction
in  the  same  amount,  provided  it  makes  all  required  withholdings  on the
compensation  element of the exercise.  In general,  the optionee's tax basis in
the shares  acquired by  exercising  an NSO is equal to the fair market value of
such shares on the date of exercise.  Upon a subsequent  sale of any such shares
in a  taxable  transaction,  the  optionee  will  realize  capital  gain or loss
(long-term  or  short-term,  depending  on whether the shares were held for more
than 12 months before the sale) in an amount equal to the difference between his
or her basis in the shares and the sale price.

         Special  rules  apply if an  optionee  pays  the  exercise  price  upon
exercise of NSOs with previously acquired shares of stock. Such a transaction is
treated as a  tax-free  exchange  of the old  shares for the same  number of new
shares.  To that extent,  the optionee's  basis in the new shares is the same as
his or her basis in the old shares, i.e., there is a carryover of basis, and the
capital gain holding period runs without interruption from the date when the old
shares were  acquired.  The value of any new shares  received by the optionee in
excess of the number of old shares  surrendered  less any cash the optionee pays
for the new shares will be taxed as ordinary income. The optionee's basis in the
additional  shares is equal to the fair market  value of such shares on the date
the shares were  transferred,  and the capital gain holding period  commences on
the same date.  The effect of these  rules is to defer the date when any gain in
the old  shares  that  are used to buy new  shares  must be  recognized  for tax
purposes.  Stated  differently,  these  rules  allow an  optionee to finance the
exercise of an NSO by using shares of stock that he or she already owns, without
paying  current  tax on any  unrealized  appreciation  in the  value of all or a
portion of those old shares.