alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 234I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 234I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6316 July 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 234I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6316 July 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 234 I/01 | Networking of organisations operating in the fields within the European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA’s) mission | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 234 I/01

Networking of organisations operating in the fields within the European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA’s) mission

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Ex12d
                               Idaho Power Company
                       Consolidated Financial Information
                       Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges



                                            Twelve Months Ended December 31,
                                                 (Thousands of Dollars)
                                         1996         1997         1998        1999       2000
<S>                                  <C>         <C>          <C>          <C>         <C>
Earnings, as defined:
  Income before  income taxes        $ 142,710   $  138,746    $ 140,984   $ 143,078   $ 223,056
  Adjust for distributed income of
  equity investees                      (1,413)      (3,943)      (4,697)       (837)     (3,116)
  Equity in loss of equity method
  investments                                0            0          476           0           0
  Minority interest in losses of
  majority owned subsidiaries                0            0         (125)          0           0
  Fixed charges, as below               58,339       61,743       61,394      62,969      58,833

     Total earnings, as defined      $ 199,636   $  196,546    $ 198,032   $ 205,210   $ 278,773

Fixed charges, as defined:
  Interest charges                   $  57,348   $   60,761    $  60,593   $  62,014   $  57,797
  Rental interest factor                   991          982          801         955       1,036

     Total fixed charges, as
     defined                         $  58,339   $   61,743    $  61,394   $  62,969   $  58,833

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges       3.42x        3.18x        3.23x       3.26x       4.74x



</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 20, 2010 

p1213 

Order 

 

December 20, 2010 

141642 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141642 

 COA: 290283 

Wayne CC: 07-012394-FC 

DWAYNE LAMONT GLOBE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 5, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### §4409. Report to Congress

The Secretary shall report to the appropriate Committees on the implementation of this chapter. The report shall include—

(1) a biennial assessment of—

(A) the estimated number of acres of wetlands and habitat for waterfowl and other migratory birds that were restored, protected, or enhanced during such two-year period by Federal, State, and local agencies and other entities in the United States, Canada, and Mexico;

(B) trends in the population size and distribution of North American migratory birds;

(C) the status of efforts to establish agreements with nations in the Western Hemisphere pursuant to section 4413 of this title; and

(D) wetlands conservation projects funded under this chapter, listed and identified by type, conservation mechanism (such as acquisition, easement, or lease), location, and duration; and

(2) an annual assessment of the status of wetlands conservation projects, including an accounting of expenditures by Federal, State, and other United States entities, and expenditures by Canadian and Mexican sources to carry out these projects.

(Pub. L. 101–233, §10, Dec. 13, 1989, 103 Stat. 1976; Pub. L. 103–375, §2(b), Oct. 19, 1994, 108 Stat. 3494; Pub. L. 107–308, §8(a)(12), (13), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2448.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 4413 of this title, referred to in par. (1)(C), was in the original a reference to section 16 of Pub. L. 101–233 which enacted section 4413 of this title and amended section 2912 of this title.

#### Amendments

2002—Par. (1)(C). Pub. L. 107–308, §8(a)(12), substituted "Western Hemisphere" for "western hemisphere" and made technical amendment to reference in original act which appears in text as reference to section 4413 of this title.

Par. (1)(D). Pub. L. 107–308, §8(a)(13), substituted "; and" for period at end.

1994—Par. (1)(D). Pub. L. 103–375 added subpar. (D).
Thomas Gorman 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Dear Sirs, 

Elizabeth Haring <lizharing@yahoo.com> 

Thursday, September 27, 2018 11:59 AM 

tgorman@chapter13alexva.com; Guzinski Joseph (USTP); 

mmichel@chapter13alexva.com 

Fw: llaine Upton Notice of Deposition 

Scanned from a Xerox Multifunction Printer.pdf 

llaine Upton has also been invited to the depositions at Rudiger & Green on Monday, October 1, 

2018. There is newly discovered evidence showing a pattern of Chapter 13 trustee misconduct and 

retaliation against Debtors. I deserve to get a fair hearing. 

I look forward to seeing you then. 

fyi, more deposition notices are also forthcoming. 

Very truly yours, 

Elizabeth Haring Coomes 

1 
In re: Elizabeth H. Coomes~ 

Debtor 

In the 

United States Bankruptcy Court 

For the Eastern District of Virginia 

Alexandria Division 

Case No: 17 -13497-BFK 

Chapter 13 

NOTICE OF DEPOSITION 

PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 30 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE tha~ pursuant to Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure and Rules 7030 and 9014 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Rule 

7030-1 of the Local Rules of Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure, the Debtor 

will take the deposition of llaine Upton, Esq. 

The deposition will commence October 1, 2018, beginning 

at 1 :00 p.m. (EST) at the offices of Rudiger & Green located at: 

Rudiger & Green 

4116 Leonard Drive 

Fairfax, VA 22030 

or on such other date and at such other location as mutually agreed by Ilaine Upton, Esq. and the 

Debtor. The deposition will continue from day to day thereafter until complete. The deposition 

will proceed before an officer authorized by law to administer oaths and will be recorded by 

audio, video and/or stenographic means. 

Pursuant to Rule 34, the Debtor requires the deponent to produce the following documents at the 

deposition: 

Copies of all of records regarding deponent's complaint regarding the standing Chapter 13 

Trustee Thomas Gorman. 

Dated: September 27, 2018 

Villanova, PA 

Debtor 

B~ifoo~
### §1321. Remedy for infringement

(a) In General.—The owner of a design is entitled, after issuance of a certificate of registration of the design under this chapter, to institute an action for any infringement of the design.

(b) Review of Refusal To Register.—(1) Subject to paragraph (2), the owner of a design may seek judicial review of a final refusal of the Administrator to register the design under this chapter by bringing a civil action, and may in the same action, if the court adjudges the design subject to protection under this chapter, enforce the rights in that design under this chapter.

(2) The owner of a design may seek judicial review under this section if—

(A) the owner has previously duly filed and prosecuted to final refusal an application in proper form for registration of the design;

(B) the owner causes a copy of the complaint in the action to be delivered to the Administrator within 10 days after the commencement of the action; and

(C) the defendant has committed acts in respect to the design which would constitute infringement with respect to a design protected under this chapter.

(c) Administrator as Party to Action.—The Administrator may, at the Administrator's option, become a party to the action with respect to the issue of registrability of the design claim by entering an appearance within 60 days after being served with the complaint, but the failure of the Administrator to become a party shall not deprive the court of jurisdiction to determine that issue.

(d) Use of Arbitration To Resolve Dispute.—The parties to an infringement dispute under this chapter, within such time as may be specified by the Administrator by regulation, may determine the dispute, or any aspect of the dispute, by arbitration. Arbitration shall be governed by title 9. The parties shall give notice of any arbitration award to the Administrator, and such award shall, as between the parties to the arbitration, be dispositive of the issues to which it relates. The arbitration award shall be unenforceable until such notice is given. Nothing in this subsection shall preclude the Administrator from determining whether a design is subject to registration in a cancellation proceeding under section 1313(c).

(Added Pub. L. 105–304, title V, §502, Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2913.)
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION


OF


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Dion J. Weisler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of HP Inc. for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HP Inc.





December 14, 2017





/s/ DION J. WEISLERDion J. WeislerPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)








I, Catherine A. Lesjak, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of HP Inc. for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HP Inc.





December 14, 2017





/s/ CATHERINE A. LESJAKCatherine A. LesjakChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HP Inc. and will be retained by HP Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Douglas Lee HUSKETH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Judy H. SILLS, Manager at Combined Records, North Carolina Department of Corrections; Theodis Beck, Secretary of Corrections at North Carolina Department of Corrections; Boyd Bennett, Director of Prisons at North Carolina of Corrections; Linda Weisel, Attorney at North Carolina Prisoner’s Legal Services, Incorporated; Karl L. Hamel, North Carolina Prisoner’s Legal Services, Incorporated; Michael E. Beale, Superior Court Judge at Anderson County Courthouse; John H. Connell, Clerk, North Carolina Court of Appeals; J. Butterfield, Judge, North Carolina Supreme Court; James M. Webb, Judge, Superior Court at Moore County Courthouse; Captain McPhadder, Correctional Officer at Brown Creek Correctional Institution; Michael S. Hamden, Executive Director at North Carolina Prisoner’s Legal Services, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-6261.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 25, 2002.

Decided May 8, 2002.

Douglas Lee Husketh, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Douglas Lee Husketh appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion1 and affirm its decision.2*See Husketh v. Sills,*No. CA-01-682-3-MU-02 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 9, 2002). *105We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

1

. We interpret the district court’s dismissal as being without prejudice.

2

. Husketh’s claim is barred because his challenge of his parole eligibility implies the invalidity of his continued confinement, and Husketh makes no showing that his conviction or sentence has been invalidated or called into question by the issuance of a federal writ of habeas corpus. *See Heck v. Humphrey,*512 U.S. 477, 486-87, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994); *McGrew v. Texas Bd. of Pardons & Paroles,*47 F.3d 158, 161 (5th Cir.1995) (holding action challenging validity of parole proceedings calls into question fact of confinement and thus must satisfy *Heck*element).
### §689d. Acceptance of title to privately owned lands within Tahquitz Preserve

Upon the recommendation of the Secretary of Agriculture the Secretary of the Interior is authorized in his discretion to accept, on behalf of the United States, title to any lands in private ownership within the boundaries of the game preserve established, and make exchange therefor under the provisions of sections 485 and 486 of this title.

(July 3, 1926, ch. 776, §5, 44 Stat. 889.)
### §§901 to 915. Repealed. Aug. 9, 1950, ch. 653, §16, 64 Stat. 425

Sections, act May 1, 1936, ch. 251, §§1–15, 49 Stat. 1246–1249, related to hunting of whales. See sections 916 to 916l of this title.
§ 300.103 FAPE—methods and payments. ( a ) Each State may use whatever State, local, Federal, and private sources of support that are available in the State to meet the requirements of this part. For example, if it is necessary to place a child with a disability in a residential facility, a State could use joint agreements between the agencies involved for sharing the cost of that placement.
( b ) Nothing in this part relieves an insurer or similar third party from an otherwise valid obligation to provide or to pay for services provided to a child with a disability.
( c ) Consistent with § 300.323(c), the State must ensure that there is no delay in implementing a child's IEP, including any case in which the payment source for providing or paying for special education and related services to the child is being determined.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0030) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1401(8), 1412(a)(1))
[71 FR 46753, Aug. 14, 2006, as amended at 72 FR 61306, Oct. 30, 2007]
#### Joseph X. Damis, Appellant, v. Casper L. Barcia, Respondent, et al., Defendants. David Slover, Appellant, v. Vincent Mosca, Respondent, et al., *699Defendants.

Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Sehenck, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents, upon the authority of *Phelps*v. *McQuade*(220 N. Y. 232, 235). The plaintiffs were deceived as to the identity of the person with whom they dealt and to whom title to the automobiles passed. No checks were given as the documents were each postdated. *(Lesser*v. *People,*73 N. Y. 78, 80.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 5,700

 7,081

 7,210

 7,442

 7,256

 6,919

 6,550

 6,682

 6,532

 5,593

 4,921

 4,353

 5,546

 6,510

 7,632

 7,753

 7,979

 8,827

 9,098

 9,378

 9,857

 11,020

 11,371

 10,190

 8,407

 6,860

 6,308

 6,727

 7,100

 8,122

 1,375

 1,140

 1,287

 1,321

 972

 698

 685

 804

 988

 894

 841

 1,073

 1,436

 1,484

 1,876

 2,113

 1,410

 662

 600

 784

 1,167

 1,881

 3,066

 3,950

 3,379

 2,802

 3,080

 2,933

 2,842

 2,671

 3,166

 3,275

 3,807

 3,929

 3,814

 3,443

 3,269

 3,236

 3,186

 3,046

 2,721

 2,647

 3,055

 3,527

 4,254

 4,221

 4,086

 4,275

 4,045

 4,440

 5,159

 5,641

 6,847

 6,811

 5,621

 4,796

 4,654

 4,682

 4,658

 4,906

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 8, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

COLLINSVILLE BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 30.61 What penalties does the Secretary impose on delinquent debtors? ( a ) If a debtor does not make a payment on a debt, or portion of a debt, within 90 days after the date specified in the first demand for payment sent to the debtor, the Secretary imposes a penalty on the debtor.
( b ) ( 1 ) The amount of the penalty imposed under paragraph (a) of this section is 6 percent per year of the amount of the delinquent debt.
( 2 ) The penalty imposed under this section runs from the date specified in the first demand for payment to the date the debt (including the penalty) is paid.
( c ) If a debtor has agreed under a repayment or settlement agreement with the Secretary to pay a penalty for failure to pay a debt when due, or has such an agreement under a grant or contract under which the debt arose, the Secretary collects the penalty in accordance with the agreement, grant, or contract.
( d ) The Secretary does not impose a penalty against State or local governments under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3(a)(1) and 1226a-1, 31 U.S.C. 3711(e))
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

CLARENCE D. LEWIS

VERSUS

LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF

PUBLIC SAFETY AND

CORRECTIONS

NO. 2022 CW 0372

JULY 18, 2022

In Re: Clarence D. Lewis, applying for supervisory writs, 

19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton

Rouge, Nos. 528191, 716114. 

BEFORE: HOLDRIDGE, PENZATO, AND LANIER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. Relator, Clarence D. Lewis, seeks mandamus

relief to order service of a second step response in ARP no. 

2004- 0816, to complete his appeal process and seeks to vacate

the ruling in docket no. 528191. However, his petition for

judicial review of the administrative decision in that matter

was dismissed without prejudice on March 2, 2005. This court

affirmed that ruling. See Lewis v. Rogers, 2005- 1138 ( La. App. 

1st Cir. 6/ 9/ 06), 938 So. 2d 1025. 

GH

AHP

WIL

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
#### § 490.505 Definitions.

All definitions in § 490.101 apply to this subpart. Unless otherwise specified in this subpart, the following definitions apply to this subpart:

*Greenhouse gas (GHG)* is any gas that absorbs infrared radiation (traps heat) in the atmosphere. Approximately 97 percent of on-road GHG emissions are carbon dioxide (CO2) from burning fossil fuel. Other transportation GHGs are methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs).

*Greenhouse gas (GHG)* is any gas that absorbs infrared radiation (traps heat) in the atmosphere. Approximately 97 percent of on-road GHG emissions are carbon dioxide (CO2) from burning fossil fuel. Other transportation GHGs are methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs).

*Level of Travel Time Reliability* is a comparison, expressed as a ratio, of the 80th percentile travel time of a reporting segment to the “normal” (50th percentile) travel time of a reporting segment occurring throughout a full calendar year.

*Normal Travel Time (or 50th percentile travel time)* is the time of travel to traverse the full extent of a reporting segment which is greater than the time for 50 percent of the travel in a calendar year to traverse the same reporting segment.

*Reference year* is calendar year 2022 for the purpose of the GHG measure.

*Travel time cumulative probability distribution* means a representation of all the travel times for a road segment during a defined reporting period (such as annually) presented in a percentile ranked order as provided in the travel time data set. The normal (50th percentile) and 80th percentile travel times used to compute the Travel Time Reliability measures may be identified by the travel time cumulative probability distribution.

[82 FR 6031, Jan. 18, 2017, as amended at 83 FR 24936, May 31, 2018; 88 FR 85392, Dec. 7, 2023]
EXHIBIT 32.1


The following certification accompanies North Bay Bancorp's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q and is not filed as provided in SEC Release Nos. 33-8212, 34-47551 and
IC 25967, dated March 21, 2003.


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the  accompanying  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of North Bay
Bancorp for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, I, Terry L. Robinson, President and
Chief  Executive  Officer of North Bay Bancorp,  hereby  certify  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:


(1)      such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of North Bay Bancorp for the quarter
ended June 30, 2004,  fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)      the  information  contained  in such  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of
North Bay Bancorp for the quarter ended June 30, 2004,  fairly presents,  in all
material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of North
Bay Bancorp.


Dated:    August 11, 2004
                                   /s/ TERRY L. ROBINSON
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   TERRY L. ROBINSON
                                   President and Chief Executive Officer



                                       25