alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 58.16 Renewal for an additional one year period. If an approved agency's application for an additional one year period is approved, such renewal period shall begin to run from the later of: ( a ) The day after the expiration date of the immediately preceding approval period; or
( b ) The actual date of approval of such renewal by the United States Trustee.
[78 FR 16152, Mar. 14, 2013]
<PAGE>   1





                               HICKOK INCORPORATED



          EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                           Year Ended September 30
                                  ----------------------------------------
                                     1997           1996           1995
                                  ----------     ----------     ----------

<S>                               <C>            <C>            <C>       
PRIMARY
-------
Average shares outstanding         1,193,497      1,192,850      1,194,500

Net effect of dilutive stock
   options- based on the
   treasury stock method using
   average market price               17,992         24,305         27,918
                                  ----------     ----------     ----------

           Total Shares            1,211,489      1,217,155      1,222,418
                                  ==========     ==========     ==========

Net Income                        $  605,317     $  959,875     $1,794,230
                                  ==========     ==========     ==========

Net Income per Share              $      .50     $      .79     $     1.47
                                  ==========     ==========     ==========


FULLY DILUTED
-------------
Average shares outstanding         1,193,497      1,192,850      1,194,500

Net effect of dilutive stock
   options- based on the
   treasury stock method using
   year-end  market price if
   higher than average market
   price                              17,992*        24,305*        29,474
                                  ----------     ----------     ----------

           Total Shares            1,211,489      1,217,155      1,223,974
                                  ==========     ==========     ==========

Net Income                        $  605,317     $  959,875     $1,794,230
                                  ==========     ==========     ==========

Net Income Per Share              $      .50     $      .79     $     1.47
                                  ==========     ==========     ==========

<FN>
* Year-end market price is less than average market price, use same as primary
shares.

</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 485 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the circumstances 

under which the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall provide reimbursement for emergency ambulance services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 10, 2019 

Mr. TIPTON (for himself, Ms. DELAURO, and Mr. WITTMAN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the 

circumstances under which the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs shall provide reimbursement for emergency ambulance services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Reimburse5 ment for Emergency Ambulance Services Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘VREASA’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 485 IH

1 SEC. 2. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS REIMBURSE2 MENT FOR EMERGENCY AMBULANCE SERV3 ICES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1725(c) of title 38, 

5 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(5) In delineating the circumstances under which re8 imbursement may be made under this section for ambu9 lance services for an individual, the Secretary shall treat 

10 such services as emergency services for which reimburse11 ment may be made under this section if the Secretary de12 termines that— 

13 ‘‘(A) the request for ambulance services was 

14 made as a result of the sudden onset of a medical 

15 condition of such a nature that a prudent layperson 

16 who possesses an average knowledge of health and 

17 medicine— 

18 ‘‘(i) would have reasonably expected that a 

19 delay in seeking immediate medical attention 

20 would have been hazardous to the life or health 

21 of the individual; or 

22 ‘‘(ii) could reasonably expect the absence 

23 of immediate medical attention to result in 

24 placing the health of the individual in serious 

25 jeopardy, the serious impairment of bodily funcVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:01 Jan 25, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H485.IH H485

pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 485 IH

1 tions, or the serious dysfunction of any bodily 

2 organ or part; and 

3 ‘‘(B) the individual is transported to the closest 

4 and most appropriate medical facility capable of 

5 treating such emergency medical condition.’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to ambulance serv8 ices provided on or after January 1, 2019. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
### §425n. Interpretation

In administering the park, the Secretary shall take such action as is necessary and appropriate to interpret, for the benefit of visitors to the park and the general public, the battles of Fredericksburg, Chancellorsville, Spotsylvania Courthouse, and the Wilderness in the larger context of the Civil War and American history, including the causes and consequences of the Civil War and including the effects of the war on all the American people, especially on the American South.

(Pub. L. 101–214, §5, Dec. 11, 1989, 103 Stat. 1851.)
### Melting and transformation temperatures of mineral and allied substances

By: Frank Charles Kracek

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1144D

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 101.80 Unsponsored written material.

Letters expressing views or urging action and other unsponsored written material regarding matters in issue in a hearing will be placed in the correspondence section of the docket of the proceeding. These data are not deemed part of the evidence or record in the hearing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7485

ROGER KELLEY, 

 Plaintiff – Appellant, 

 v. 

LARRY POWERS, Director, Spartanburg County Detention Center; 

TERESA SPELLER, Head of Security at Spartanburg County 

Detention Center, 

 Defendants – Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Beaufort. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District 

Judge. (9:07-cv-03655-GRA) 

Submitted: January 7, 2009 Decided: January 20, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Roger Kelley, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Todd Darwin, HOLCOMBE, 

BOMAR, GUNN & BRADFORD, PA, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

Roger Kelley appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. The 

district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2006). The magistrate judge 

recommended that relief be denied and advised Kelley that 

failure to file timely, specific objections to this 

recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court 

order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, 

Kelley failed to file specific objections to the magistrate 

judge’s recommendation; he only restated the claims raised in 

his complaint. 

The timely filing of specific objections to a 

magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve 

appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when 

the parties have been warned that the failure to object will 

waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 

845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 

(1985). Kelley has waived appellate review by failing to file 

specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, 

we affirm the judgment of the district court. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

2 
3 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly Report of Nuance
Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Karen Blasing, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



By:.

/s/    KAREN BLASINGKaren BlasingVice President and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 8, 2004
# Official Journal L 7/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 7 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5110 January 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 7

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5110 January 2008

---

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | Commission |
| | | 2008/22/EC |
| | * | Commission Decision of 19 December 2007 laying down rules for the implementation of Decision No 573/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2008 to 2013 as part of the General programme ‘Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows’ as regards Member States’ management and control systems, the rules for administrative and financial management and the eligibility of expenditure on projects co-financed by the Fund
  (notified under document number C(2007) 6396) | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

DECISIONS

Commission

2008/22/EC

*

Commission Decision of 19 December 2007 laying down rules for the implementation of Decision No 573/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2008 to 2013 as part of the General programme ‘Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows’ as regards Member States’ management and control systems, the rules for administrative and financial management and the eligibility of expenditure on projects co-financed by the Fund
  (notified under document number C(2007) 6396)

(notified under document number C(2007) 6396)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Hyman Zeitz and Isaac Tarshis, Respondents, v. Harry Cook, Appellant, Impleaded with Aaron Benjamin, Defendant.

Order vacating order for examination before trial reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The affirmative defense is a legitimate ground to examine a plaintiff before trial. Plaintiffs’ relation to this bond and mortgage necessarily implies that they know how they took it with the guaranty, and hence that a plaintiff can give testimony that is material upon the issue whether or not they made it a cover for a usurious loan to the mortgagor. *(Anderson*v. *Lisman.*130 App. Div. 134.) The grounds shown for such examination were sufficient. *(Tisdale Lumber Co.*v. *Droge,*147 App. Div. 55; *Continental Securities Co.*v. Belmont, Id. 118; *Poole*v. Means, 144 id. 155.) Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
#### § 207.4 Approved application.

Approval of a refugee application by USCIS outside the United States authorizes CBP to admit the applicant conditionally as a refugee upon arrival at the port within four months of the date the refugee application was approved. There is no appeal from a denial of refugee status under this chapter.

[76 FR 53783, Aug. 29, 2011]
#### STATE, Respondent, v. ANDERSON, Appellant.

(253 N. W. 64.)

(File No. 7596.

Opinion filed February 23, 1934.)

*Thos. L. Arnold,*of Aberdeen, for Appellant.

*Walter Conway,*Attorney General, *Herman L.*Bode, Assistant Attorney General, and *Lewis W. Bicknell,*State’s Attorney, 'of Webster, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was charged with the crime of transporting intoxicating liquor in Day county, S. D., on May 5, 1933. The jury having found him. guilty, the court imposed sentence, and a judgment 'was entered thereon. Appellant has appealed from the judgment and the order overruling the motion for new trial.

We have examined the record, and find no error.

The judgment and order appealed from' are affirmed.

All the Judges concur.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 92205 / June 17, 2021

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20003

In the Matter of

Unikrn, Inc.,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

EXTENSION ORDER

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested an extension of time until March 

31, 2022 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution under Rule 1101(a) of the Commission’s 

Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(a).

On September 15, 2020, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist 

Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933, Making Findings, and 

Imposing Penalties and a Cease-and-Desist Order (the “Order”)1 against Unikrn, Inc. (the 

“Respondent”). The Commission ordered the Respondent to pay a $6,100,000 civil money 

penalty to the Commission. The Commission also created a Fair Fund, pursuant to Section 

308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, so the penalty paid can be distributed to harmed 

investors (the “Fair Fund”).

The Fair Fund consists of the $6,100,000 in civil money penalties paid by the 

Respondent.

 

1

 Securities Act. Rel. No. 10841 (Sept. 15, 2020).
2

In its request for an extension of time, the Division states that additional time is needed to 

develop the distribution methodology and draft the proposed plan of distribution.

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s 

request for an extension of time until March 31, 2022 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution 

is granted. 

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.2

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

2

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(i).
### Geology of the Reliz Canyon, Thompson Canyon, and San Lucas quadrangles, Monterey County, California

By: David L. Durham

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1141Q

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcus PLATER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-6260.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 25, 2002.

Decided May 8, 2002.

Marcus Plater, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Marcus Plater seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. To the extent that Plater challenges the constitutionality of 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(b) (West 1999 *&*Supp. 2001), this claim fails as we have upheld the constitutionality of § 841(b). *United States v. McAllister,*272 F.3d 228 (4th Cir.2001). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *104
      *United States v. Plater,*Nos. CR-99-559; CA-01-1489 (D.Md. Jan. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

              Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
                      of Title 18 of the United States Code

      I, Barry S. Sternlicht, the Chief Executive Officer of Starwood Hotels &
Resorts ("Starwood"), certify that (i) the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Starwood.

                                       /s/ Barry S. Sternlicht
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Barry S. Sternlicht
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       Starwood Hotels & Resorts
                                       February 26, 2003
**Exhibit 32.1**

****

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION  1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report  of Hickok Incorporated (the "Company") on form 10-KSB  for the period ending  September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon  the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert L. Bauman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C.section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

-        the Report 					fully complies  with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and 

-        the 					information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all 					materialrespects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/ R. L. Bauman

R. L. Bauman

Chief Executive Officer

December 22, 2004