alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on March 30, 2011 at 10 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002. 

The subject matters of the Open Meeting will be: 

Item 1: The Commission will consider whether to propose joint rules with other Agencies to implement Section 941(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act relating to credit risk retention by securitizers of asset-backed securities. 

Item 2: The Commission will consider whether to propose a new rule and rule amendments to implement Section 952 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which requires the Commission to direct the national securities exchanges and national securities associations to adopt certain listing standards with respect to compensation committees and compensation advisers. Section 952 also requires the Commission to adopt new disclosure rules concerning the use of compensation consultants and conflicts of interest. 

Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, determined that no earlier notice thereof was possible. 

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. 

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: 

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. 

 Dated: March 24, 2011. 

Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2011-7342 Filed 3-24-11; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
# Official Journal C 257/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 257 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 635 August 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 257

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 635 August 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 257/01 | Euro exchange rates — 4 August 2020 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 257/01

Euro exchange rates — 4 August 2020

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 257/02 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9901 – GIG Solar/Siemens/JV) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2020/C 257/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9870 – Total Direct Energie/Kernaman) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 257/04 | Publication of an application for approval of non-minor amendments to a product specification pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 5 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2020/C 257/02

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9901 – GIG Solar/Siemens/JV) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

2

2020/C 257/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9870 – Total Direct Energie/Kernaman) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2020/C 257/04

Publication of an application for approval of non-minor amendments to a product specification pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Timothy Cline and Others, Appellants, v. William M. Stephens and Others, Respondents.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
### Index of metallic and nonmetallic mineral deposits of Alaska compiled from published reports of Federal and State agencies through 1959

By: Edward Huntington CobbReuben Kachadoorian

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1139

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<PAGE>   1


                               HICKOK INCORPORATED



          EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               Year Ended September 30
                                                               ---------------------------------------------------
                                                                  2000                 1999                1998
                                                               ----------           ----------          ----------
<S>                                                            <C>                  <C>                 <C>
PRIMARY
-------
Average shares outstanding                                      1,204,276            1,199,416           1,196,602

Net effect of dilutive stock
  options- based on the treasury stock
  method using average market price                                    -- **                -- **           18,073
                                                               ----------           ----------          ----------

             Total Shares                                       1,204,276            1,199,416           1,214,675
                                                               ==========           ==========          ==========

Net Income (Loss)                                              $ (410,604)          $ (268,171)         $1,034,400
                                                               ==========           ==========          ==========

Net Income (Loss) per Share                                    $     (.34)          $     (.22)         $      .85
                                                               ==========           ==========          ==========


FULLY DILUTED
-------------
Average shares outstanding                                      1,204,276            1,199,416           1,196,602

Net effect of dilutive stock
  options- based on the treasury stock
  method using year-end market price
  if higher than average market price                                  -- **                -- **           18,073*
                                                               ----------           ----------          ----------

             Total Shares                                       1,204,276            1,199,416           1,214,675
                                                               ==========           ==========          ==========

Net Income (Loss)                                              $ (410,604)          $ (268,171)         $1,034,400
                                                               ==========           ==========          ==========

Net Income (Loss) Per Share                                    $     (.34)          $     (.22)         $      .85
                                                               ==========           ==========          ==========
</TABLE>


*    Year-end  market  price is less  than  average  market  price,  use same as
primary shares.
**   Net effect of stock options was antidilutive for the period.
### EXHIBIT 19 Hoffnalge, G.

– Accuracy of Visibility Protocol Modeling in BART EvaluationsPPL M ONTANA , LLC C OMMENTS

P ROPOSED R EGIONAL H AZE F EDERAL I MPLEMENTATION P LAN

FOR THE S TATE OF M ONTANA Docket ID No. EPA-R08-OAR-2011-0851

## A TTACHMENT 

## 3

Accuracy of Visibility Protocol Modeling in BART Evaluations, prepared by Gale F. Hoffnagle, TRC Environmental Corporation, June 15 , 2012
### §4806. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–362, title IX, §901(a)(1), Nov. 10, 1998, 112 Stat. 3289

Section, Pub. L. 102–335, §7, Aug. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 862; Pub. L. 103–437, §6(d)(43), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4585, related to report to Congress concerning sufficiency of Pacific yew harvests to supply taxol required for medicinal purposes and concerning Pacific yew inventory required by section 4802(d) of this title.
§ 658.16 Exclusions from length and width determinations. ( a ) Vehicle components not excluded by law or regulation shall be included in the measurement of the length and width of commercial motor vehicles.
( b ) The following shall be excluded from either the measured length or width of commercial motor vehicles, as applicable: ( 1 ) Rear view mirrors, turn signal lamps, handholds for cab entry/egress, splash and spray suppressant devices, load induced tire bulge;
( 2 ) All non-property-carrying devices, or components thereof— ( i ) At the front of a semitrailer or trailer, or
( ii ) That do not extend more than 3 inches beyond each side or the rear of the vehicle, or
( iii ) That do not extend more than 24 inches beyond the rear of the vehicle and are needed for loading or unloading, or (vi) Listed in appendix D to this part;
( 3 ) Resilient bumpers that do not extend more than 6 inches beyond the front or rear of the vehicle;
( 4 ) Aerodynamic devices that extend a maximum of 5 feet beyond the rear of the vehicle, provided such devices have neither the strength, rigidity nor mass to damage a vehicle, or injure a passenger in a vehicle, that strikes a trailer so equipped from the rear, and provided also that they do not obscure tail lamps, turn signals, marker lamps, identification lamps, or any other required safety devices, such as hazardous materials placards or conspicuity markings; and
( 5 ) A fixed step up to 3 inches deep at the front of an existing automobile transporter until April 29, 2005. It will be the responsibility of the operator of the unit to prove that the step existed prior to April 29, 2002. Such proof can be in the form of a work order for equipment modification, a receipt for purchase and installation of the piece, or any similar type of documentation. However, after April 29, 2005, the step shall no longer be excluded from a vehicle's length.
( c ) Each exclusion allowance is specific and may not be combined with other excluded devices.
( d ) Measurements are to be made from a point on one side or end of a commercial motor vehicle to the same point on the opposite side or end of the vehicle.
[67 FR 15110, Mar. 29, 2002]
# Official Journal C 210/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 210 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 643 June 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 210

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 643 June 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2021/C 210/01 | Council conclusions on ‘Europe’s Media in the Digital Decade: An Action Plan to Support Recovery and Transformation’ | 1 |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 210/02 | Euro exchange rates — 2 June 2021 | 7 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2021/C 210/01

Council conclusions on ‘Europe’s Media in the Digital Decade: An Action Plan to Support Recovery and Transformation’

1

European Commission

2021/C 210/02

Euro exchange rates — 2 June 2021

7

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 210/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10229 — Allianz/Aviva Italia) (
  1
  ) | 8 |
| 2021/C 210/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10097 – AMD/Xilinx) (
  1
  ) | 10 |
| 2021/C 210/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10272 — Utmost/Quilter International) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 11 |
| 2021/C 210/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10171 — INEOS/Daimler/Mercedes-Benz Grand Prix) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 13 |
| 2021/C 210/07 | Prior notification of a concentration – Case M.10329 — Fairfax/Eurolife – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 14 |
| 2021/C 210/08 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10282 — ICG/Infra Group) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 15 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2021/C 210/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10229 — Allianz/Aviva Italia) (
  1
  )

1

8

2021/C 210/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10097 – AMD/Xilinx) (
  1
  )

1

10

2021/C 210/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10272 — Utmost/Quilter International) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

11

2021/C 210/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10171 — INEOS/Daimler/Mercedes-Benz Grand Prix) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

13

2021/C 210/07

Prior notification of a concentration – Case M.10329 — Fairfax/Eurolife – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

14

2021/C 210/08

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10282 — ICG/Infra Group) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

15

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALEJANDRO PRADO, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

J. JIMENEZ, Lieutenant; et al., 

Defendants.

No. 19-15985 

D.C. No. 2:15-cv-01866-WBS-DB 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 5, 2020**

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Alejandro Prado appeals pro se from the district 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-15985 

court’s summary judgment in his action alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). We have jurisdiction 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. JL Beverage Co., LLC v. Jim Beam 

Brands Co., 828 F.3d 1098, 1104 (9th Cir. 2016). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Prado’s ADA 

claim because Prado failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether 

defendants were deliberately indifferent to his disability. See Duvall v. County of 

Kitsap, 260 F.3d 1124, 1138-39 (9th Cir. 2001) (to recover monetary damages 

under the ADA, a plaintiff must show intentional discrimination; the test for 

intentional discrimination is deliberate indifference).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Prado’s Eighth 

Amendment deliberate indifference claim because Prado failed to raise a triable

dispute as to whether defendants were deliberately indifferent to a serious risk to 

Prado’s health or safety. See Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 847 (1994) 

(explaining that a prison official acts with deliberate indifference if the prison 

official “knows that inmates face a substantial risk of serious harm and disregards 

that risk by failing to take reasonable measures to abate it”).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Prado’s equal 

protection claim because Prado failed to raise a triable dispute as to whether 

defendants acted with an intent or purpose to discriminate against him based on his 
3 19-15985 

disability. See Hartmann v. Cal. Dep’t of Corrs. & Rehab., 707 F.3d 1114, 1123 

(9th Cir. 2013) (setting forth requirements of an equal protection claim, including 

that the defendant must act with a discriminatory intent or purpose based upon 

membership in a protected class). 

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

_____________________ Division 

In re 

 Case No. 

 Debtor(s) 

 Chapter 

ORDER OF DESIGNATION 

 An order for relief under Title 11 U.S.C., Chapter ____ having been entered on 

the petition filed in this case on ___________________________; it is, therefore 

 ORDERED that ____________________________ is designated by the Court to 

perform the duties imposed upon the debtor by the Bankruptcy Code. This designation 

shall remain in effect during the entire pendency of this case until altered by order of this 

Court; and it is further 

 ORDERED that the Clerk mail a copy of this order to the designee, the attorney 

for the debtor, the trustee, and the United States Trustee. 

Date: ______________________ _____________________________ 

 United States Bankruptcy Judge 

 NOTICE OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER 

 ENTERED ON DOCKET 

 ____________________________ 

[ver. 12/03] 

Richmond

Fredericksburg Park, LLC

17-32287-KLP

11

11

May 2, 2017

Andrew S. Garrett

May 4 2017 /s/ Keith L. Phillips

May 5 2017

Case 17-32287-KLP Doc 8 Filed 05/05/17 Entered 05/05/17 11:31:43 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2     DAC TECHNOLOGIES GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) ORRULE 15d-14(c) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of DAC Technologies Group InternationalInc (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Robert C. Goodwin, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.         /s/ Robert C. Goodwin   Robert C. Goodwin, CFO, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer      Date: November 14, 2005
(No. 73-CC-0449

#### Giffin, Winning, Lindner, Newkirk & Cohen, a Partnership, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed December 26, 1978.*

The Claimant filed a claim for services rendered to the director of the Department of Finances of Illinois. Said claim being in the amount of $2,071.49; $1,840.00 for services rendered and $231.49 for advancement in said cause by Claimant.

*510The only amount that appears to be in dispute between the parties hereto, seems to be the $100.00. The Respondent points out that a distinction should be made between services rendered in litigation and services rendered as an aid or advisor. The evidence in this case shows that the charge for litigation was $100.00.

The objection made by the Respondent in said amount is correct and award is hereby entered in the amount of $2,071.49; $1,840.00 for Claimant’s bill for services rendered as an aid or advisor; and $231.49 monies advanced the Claimant on behalf of the Department of Finance.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4794 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4794

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 8320 13th Avenue in Brooklyn, New York, as the ``Mother Frances 
                 Xavier Cabrini Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MOTHER FRANCES XAVIER CABRINI POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 8320 13th Avenue in Brooklyn, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Mother Frances Xavier Cabrini Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mother 
Frances Xavier Cabrini Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 5, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4794

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 8320 13th Avenue in Brooklyn, New York, as the ``Mother Frances 
                 Xavier Cabrini Post Office Building''.
```