alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 300.222 LEA and State agency compliance. ( a ) *General.* If the SEA, after reasonable notice and an opportunity for a hearing, finds that an LEA or State agency that has been determined to be eligible under this subpart is failing to comply with any requirement described in §§ 300.201 through 300.213, the SEA must reduce or must not provide any further payments to the LEA or State agency until the SEA is satisfied that the LEA or State agency is complying with that requirement.
( b ) *Notice requirement.* Any State agency or LEA in receipt of a notice described in paragraph (a) of this section must, by means of public notice, take the measures necessary to bring the pendency of an action pursuant to this section to the attention of the public within the jurisdiction of the agency.
( c ) *Consideration.* In carrying out its responsibilities under this section, each SEA must consider any decision resulting from a hearing held under §§ 300.511 through 300.533 that is adverse to the LEA or State agency involved in the decision.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1413(d))
#### F. H. Renberg, Defendant in Error, v. Chicago City Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 15,213.

1. *Verdicts—when set aside as against the evidence.*A verdict manifestly against the weight of the evidence will tie set aside on review.

2. *Agency—when conductor not authorized to bind traction company.*A conductor has no express or implied authority to bind his company for medical attention given to a person injured by the car of such company.

Assumpsit. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Oscar M. Torrison, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1909.

Reversed with finding.

Opinion filed December 2, 1910.

Charles J. Gould and Ferdinand Goss, for plaintiff in error; John R. Harrington, of counsel.

No appearance by appellee.

Mr. Justice Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.

Defendant in error, F. H. Renberg, recovered a judgment in the Municipal Court of Chicago against the Chicago City Railway Company, for professional services rendered by him on January 1, 1908, to a man named Richardson, who fell from a car of the company and was injured. Richardson never made any claim against the company, and the evidence in this case tends to show no liability on the part of plaintiff in error for Richardson’s injury.

Richardson was picked up by the conductor and motórman of the car of plaintiff in error from which he fell, and was carried to a drug store at the corner of Cottage Grove avenue and Sixty-fifth street. From there he was taken upstairs to the office of the defendant in error by whom his wounds were dressed.

The contention of defendant in error on the trial *120was that the conductor of the car requested him to give Richardson medical attention. This is contradicted by the testimony of several witnesses. The manifest weight of the evidence sustains the contention of plaintiff in error that the conductor made no such request.

If it be conceded however that the conductor requested Dr. Renberg to give Richardson medical attention, the conductor had no implied or express authority to employ him. St. L. & K. C. R. R. Co. v. Olive, 40 Ill. App. 82; St. L. U. B. T. Ry. Co. v. Wiggins, 47 id. 474; Tucker v. St. L. K. C. & N. R. R. Co., 54 Mo. 177; R. R. Co. v. Gary, 22 Fla. 356; Ry. v. Beatty, 35 Kan. 265; Sevier v. R. R., 92 Ala. 258.

There is no evidence in the record of any ratification of the employment of defendant in error by plaintiff in error.

The evidence does not sustain the verdict and judgment. The judgment is accordingly reversed with a finding of fact.

*Reversed with finding.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          19,264
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,227,546
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (150,000)
<INVENTORY>                                     20,989
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,311,122
<PP&E>                                         820,334
<DEPRECIATION>                               (350,077)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,072,479
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,741,642
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,841
<OTHER-SE>                                     318,996
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,072,479
<SALES>                                      3,677,397
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,677,397
<CGS>                                          865,421
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  865,421
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,434,146
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (622,170)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (622,170)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (622,170)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
§ 200.9 Deferral of assessments. ( a ) A State may defer the start or suspend the administration of the assessments required under § 200.2 for one year for each year for which the amount appropriated for State assessment grants under section 1002(b) of the Act is less than $369,100,000.
( b ) A State may not cease the development of the assessments referred to in paragraph (a) of this section even if sufficient funds are not appropriated under section 1002(b) of the Act.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3, 3474, 6302(b), 6311(b)(2)(I), 6363(a), and 6571)
[81 FR 88938, Dec. 8, 2016]
### PHANTOM 3 P ROFESSIONAL Release Note

© 201 5 DJI . All Rights Reserved . 

### 201 5 . 8 . 4 Overview : 1. All - in - O ne f irmware version updated to : v1. 3. 20 2. DJI GO app iOS version updated to: v2.0 .0 

### What ’s New : 1. Added HD Video Conversion option in the video editor when cutting footage to video . 2. Automatic photo sync ing of the compressed file s to your mobile device . 3. Added option to downgrade the aircraft firmware (remote controller version will be released soon) . 

### Bug Fixes : 1. Fixed issue of the camera failing to save photos when shooting in burst mode.


### Notice :  The firmware can be downgraded to v1.1.9 or later only.

### PHANTOM 3 P ROFESSIONAL Release Note

© 201 5 DJI . All Rights Reserved . 

### 201 5 . 6 . 15 Overview : 1. All - in - One Firmware version updated to : v1. 2.6 

### Major Updates : 1. Anti - distortion feature added for images and non - 4K videos. 2. Various bug fixes.

### PHANTOM 3 P ROFESSIONAL Release Note

© 201 5 DJI . All Rights Reserved . 

### 201 5 . 5 . 22 Overview : 1. All - in - One Firmware version updated to : v1. 1.9 

### Major Updates : 1. Fixed issue of some aircraft unable to determine their altitudes. 2. Fixed issue of the DJI Pilot app unable to obtain and display battery error history. 3. Fixed issue of the compass calibration progress not being displayed properly. 

### Notice :  Users are advised to update the firmware version to v1.1.9, otherwise future firmware will not be able to install.  Users may skip updating the remote controller if they have already updated the firmware to v1.1.8, as the latest firmware update does not af fect the remote controller.


### 201 5 . 5 . 8 Overview : 2. All - in - One Firmware version updated to : v1. 1.8 

### Major Updates : 1. Fixed the issue of failure to update the firmware if the remote controller is turned off. 

### Notice :  Users are advised to update the firmware version to v1.1.8, otherwise future firmware will not be able to install.  Re - link the remote controller to the aircraft if the connection is lost after the firmware update .

### PHANTOM 3 P ROFESSIONAL Release Note

© 201 5 DJI . All Rights Reserved . 

### 201 5 . 5 . 6 Overview : 1. All - in - One F irmware version updated to : v1. 1.6 2. DJI Pilot app iOS version updated to: v1.1.1 3. DJI Pilot app Android version updated to: v1.1.0 

### Major Updates : Updated to be compatible with the iOS version of the DJI Pilot app. 

### Notice : Re - link the remote controller to the aircraft if the connection is lost after the firmware upgrade.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

In Re: )

) Case No. 18-11792-BFK

Jean Jerome Ngando )

) Chapter 13

Debtor

NOTICE AND MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

COMES NOW the debtor, by counsel, and respectfully requests this Court to enter a 

voluntary dismissal in the above-referenced case. This case has not been previously converted 

under 11 U.S.C. §§706, 1112, or 1208.

WHEREFORE, the debtor requests the Court to grant him a voluntary dismissal. 

By,

/s/Robert S. Brandt

The Law Office of Robert S Brandt

VSB# 46196

1513 King Street 

Alexandria, VA 22314

703-342-7330

Counsel for Debtor 

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that I caused a true copy of the foregoing Motion for Voluntary Dismissal

to be served electronically this 6th day of July, 2018 to all creditors and Thomas P. Gorman, 

Chapter 13 Trustee.

/s/Robert S. Brandt

Case 18-11792-BFK Doc 21 Filed 07/06/18 Entered 07/06/18 09:18:26 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

____________________________________ 

) 

In re: Alice Thomas )

 ) Case Number: 18-12376

)

) Chapter 13

Debtor(s). ) 

____________________________________) 

 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE AMENDED PLAN

COME(S) NOW, the Debtor(s), Alice Thomas, through the undersigned counsel, 

Edward Gonzalez, Esq., and moves this honorable court for an extension of time to file 

her amended plan in the above cited case, and for cause states as follows:

1. Debtor consented to denial of confirmation with leave to amend of the last plan she 

proposed.

2. Among the issues pending are the size of priority tax debt owed to the Internal 

Revenue Service.

3. At this time, the last filed Proof of Claim lists the tax years 2016 and 2017 as 

“Estimated – SEE NOTE”. However, there is no “Note” in the document. (See 

attached IRS POC.)

4. Furthermore, the Debtor prepared the tax returns and sent them to IRS for posting.

5. Counsel spoke to the IRS agent at the Insolvency unit to resolve this issue three 

weeks ago. The agent told counsel she would look into the issue and get back to him.

6. As of today, she has not called back. Counsel called again today and left a message 

asking for a call back to resolve this issue.

Case 18-12376-KHK Doc 44 Filed 11/15/18 Entered 11/15/18 11:13:42 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
WHEREFORE, Debtor respectfully asks for additional time to resolve this issue with 

IRS to be able to finalize a plan providing for the proper amount of priority taxes.

Dated: November 15, 2018 Respectfully Submitted, 

/s/ Edward Gonzalez_________ 

Edward Gonzalez, 

VA Bar #39882

2405 Eye Street, NW, Suite 1A 

Washington, DC 20037 

(202) 822-4970 

Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that the foregoing was sent by the court’s electronic mailing 

and/or by first class, postage pre-paid, mail to the following: 

1. U.S. Trustee

2. Chapter 13 Trustee 

/s/ Edward Gonzalez

Edward Gonzalez

Case 18-12376-KHK Doc 44 Filed 11/15/18 Entered 11/15/18 11:13:42 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit32.2**

**Certificationof Chief Financial Officer****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned ChiefFinancial Officer of Hilton Hotels Corporation (the “Company”), herebycertifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the accompanying Annual Report onForm 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”)fully complies with the  requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  February 28,2007
|        | /s/ ROBERT M. LA FORGIA                                 |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Robert M. La Forgia                                     |
|   | *Executive Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer* |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelyto accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, andis not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whethermade before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporationlanguage in such filing.

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

STATEMENT OF CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER/PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I, Howard L. Ehler, Jr., the Chief Operating Officer/Principal Executive Officer of Imperial Industries, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,

(i)

the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:

March 19, 2010

| |                            
| | ---------------------------
| | /s/ HOWARD L. EHLER, JR.   
| | Howard L. Ehler, Jr.       
| | Chief Operating Officer/   
| | Principal Executive Officer



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     9
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             YEAR    
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                        529,724
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          2,474
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                              355,498
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               35,943
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 2,147,405
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                0
<LOANS>                                     7,580,251
<ALLOWANCE>                                  (107,540)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             11,023,038
<DEPOSITS>                                  8,633,329
<SHORT-TERM>                                  700,247
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           132,600
<LONG-TERM>                                   506,548
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                   100,000
<COMMON>                                      255,362
<OTHER-SE>                                    694,952
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             11,023,038
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               594,775
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             141,391
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               13,916
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              750,082
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            286,338
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            322,325
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         427,757
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     620
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              2,718
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               361,944
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               210,624
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    137,389
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  137,389
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.98
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   4.75
<LOANS-NON>                                    20,356
<LOANS-PAST>                                    4,839
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                19,366
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              129,039
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  43,942
<RECOVERIES>                                   21,823
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             107,540
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          107,540
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        23,400
        

</TABLE>
### §715k. Authorization of appropriations for purposes of subchapter; disposal; reservation protectors

For the acquisition, including the location, examination, and survey, of suitable areas of land, water, or land and water, for use as migratory bird reservations, and necessary expenses incident thereto, and for the administration, maintenance, and development of such areas and other preserves, reservations, or breeding grounds frequented by migratory birds and under the administration of the Secretary of the Interior, including the construction of dams, dikes, ditches, flumes, spillways, buildings, and other necessary improvements, and for the elimination of the loss of migratory birds from alkali poisoning, oil pollution of waters, or other causes, for cooperation with local authorities in wildlife conservation, for investigations and publications relating to North American birds, for personal services, printing, engraving, and issuance of circulars, posters, and other necessary matter and for the enforcement of the provisions of this subchapter, there are hereby authorized to be appropriated, in addition to all other amounts authorized by law to be appropriated, $200,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1940, and for each fiscal year thereafter. No part of any appropriation authorized by this section shall be used for payment of the salary, compensation, or expenses of any United States protector, except reservation protectors for the administration, maintenance and protection of such reservations and the birds thereon: Provided, That reservation protectors appointed under the provisions of this subchapter, shall be selected, when practicable, from qualified citizens of the State in which they are to be employed. The Secretary of the Interior is authorized and directed to make such expenditures and to employ such means, including personal services in the District of Columbia and elsewhere, as may be necessary to carry out the foregoing objects.

(Feb. 18, 1929, ch. 257, §12, 45 Stat. 1224; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. II, §4(f), eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2731, 53 Stat. 1433; Pub. L. 89–669, §7(a), Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 929.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Provisions of this section which related to appropriations for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1930, to June 30, 1939, were omitted.

#### Amendments

1966—Pub. L. 89–669 substituted "grounds frequented by migratory birds" for "grounds frequented by migratory game birds", and "United States protector" for "United States game protector".

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Transfer of functions of Secretary of Agriculture to Secretary of the Interior by Reorg. Plan No. II of 1939, see Transfer of Functions note set out under section 715a of this title.
[GTC TELECOM CORP. LETTERHEAD]

                                                    December 27, 1999


Dear Robert:


This letter confirms our understanding that you are to be issued 40,000 shares
of GTC Telecom common stock with registration rights.  These shares are issued
to you, in lieu of cash, as payment against $80,000 for services rendered
relating marketing on behalf of GTC.

Please sign this letter confirming your understanding of the agreement.

Sincerely,


Eric Clemons
/s/ Eric Clemons                                   /s/ Robert Gleckman
COO                                                Robert Gleckman
GTC Telecom
### §428l. Acquisition of lands; agreement for transfer of jurisdiction

Within the area designated for addition to such battlefield under section 428k of this title, the Secretary is authorized to acquire non-Federal lands and interests in lands by purchase, by donation, by purchase with donated funds, or in such other manner and by such means as he may deem to be in the public interest, except that the Surrender House and land upon which it is situated shall be acquired only by donation or by purchase with donated funds. Administrative jurisdiction and control over lands administered by the Corps of Engineers, Department of the Army, above contour elevation 369 and which, under authority of section 428k of this title, are designated for inclusion in the battlefield, shall, upon agreement of the administering agency, be transferred to the Secretary of the Interior without a transfer of funds.

(Pub. L. 86–738, §§2, 4, Sept. 8, 1960, 74 Stat. 876.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Battlefield" substituted in text for "park" in view of redesignation of Fort Donelson National Military Park as Fort Donelson National Battlefield by Pub. L. 86–738, §4, set out as section 428n of this title.