alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> OPUR1
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE NORAM
ENERGY CORP. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000007314
<NAME> NORAM ENERGY CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    2,702,489
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  2,220,252
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,147,299
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        69,056
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,139,096
<COMMON>                                             1
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    2,463,831
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             20,847
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               2,479,045
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           937,993
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      712,100
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  232,145
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,777,813
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                6,139,096
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    5,858,390
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            55,781
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   5,612,594
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   5,612,594
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        245,796
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               9,453
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 255,249
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       132,746
<NET-INCOME>                                    66,959
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   66,959
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       10,070
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         156,573
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 230.203 Policy.

Based on the provisions of Pub. L. 97-424, dated January 6, 1983, it is the policy of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to promote increased participation of minority business enterprises in Federal-aid highway contracts in part through the development and implementation of cost effective supportive services programs through the State highway agencies.
§ 515.15 Penalties ( a ) Beginning on October 1, 2019, and in each fiscal year thereafter, if a State DOT has not developed and implemented an asset management plan consistent with the requirements of 23 U.S.C. 119 and this part, the maximum Federal share for National Highway Performance Program projects and activities carried out by the State in that fiscal year shall be reduced to 65 percent for that fiscal year.
( b ) ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, if the State DOT has not developed and implemented an asset management plan that is consistent with the requirements of 23 U.S.C. 119 and this part and established the performance targets for NHS pavements and bridges required under 23 U.S.C. 150(d) by the date that is 18 months after the effective date of the 23 U.S.C. 150(c) final rule for NHS pavements and bridges, the FHWA will not approve any further projects using National Highway Performance Program funds. Such suspension of funding approvals will terminate once the State DOT has developed and implemented an asset management plan that is consistent with the requirements of 23 U.S.C. 119 and this part and established its performance targets for NHS pavements and bridges required under 23 U.S.C. 150(d).
( 2 ) The FHWA may extend this deadline if FHWA determines that the State DOT has made a good faith effort to develop and implement an asset management plan and establish the performance targets for NHS pavements and bridges required under 23 U.S.C. 150(d).
### §742k. Management and disposition of vessels and other property acquired and arising out of fishery loans or related type of activities

For the purpose of facilitating administration of, and protecting the interest of the Government in, the fishery loan fund established by section 742c of this title and any related type of activities relating to fisheries for which the Department of the Interior is now or may hereafter be responsible, the Secretary of the Interior, notwithstanding any other provisions of law, may hereafter administer, complete, recondition, reconstruct, renovate, repair, maintain, operate, charter, assign, or sell upon such terms and conditions as he may deem most advantageous to the United States, any vessel, plant, or other property acquired by him on behalf of the United States and arising out of any fishery loan or any related type of activity by the Secretary of the Interior. The Secretary may use any of the applicable funds in each particular instance for the aforesaid purposes.

(Pub. L. 87–219, Sept. 13, 1961, 75 Stat. 493.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Transfer of functions to Secretary of Commerce from Secretary of the Interior by Reorg. Plan No. 4 of 1970, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090, see Transfer of Functions note set out under section 742b of this title.
#### Daniel deGorter et al., Assignees of Banque Nationals de Belgique Respondents, v. Banque de France, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glen-non, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
| ** **

** **

**Exhibit 12.1**                      |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| **IDACORP, Inc.**                                             |
| **Consolidated Financial  Information**                       |
| **Ratio of Earnings to  Fixed Charges**                       |
|                                                               |
|                                                               | **Twelve Months Ended** |
|                                                               | **December 31,** |
|                                                               | **(Thousands of Dollars)** |
|                                                               |
| ** **                                                    | **2009** | **2008** | **2007** | **2006** | **2005** |
|                                                               |  |  |  |  |  |
| Earnings, as defined:                                         |  |  |  |  |  |
|                                                               |  |  |  |  |  |
| Income from continuing operations  before income taxes        |  $ | 146,737  |  $ | 117,614  |  $ | 96,003  |  $ | 115,452  |  $ | 103,326  |
| Adjust for distributed income of  equity investees            | 13,724  | 5,176  | 6,064  | (9,347) | (10,370) |
| Equity in loss of equity method  investments                  | -  | -  | -  | -  | -  |
| Minority interest in losses of  majority owned                |  |  |  |  |  |
| subsidiaries                                                  | -  | -  | -  | -  | -  |
| Fixed charges, as below                                       | 79,461  | 81,172  | 72,879  | 65,745  | 64,379  |
| Total earnings, as defined                                    |  $ | 239,922  |  $ | 203,962  |  $ | 174,946  |  $ | 171,850  |  $ | 157,335  |
|                                                               |  |  |  |  |  |
| Fixed charges, as defined:                                    |  |  |  |  |  |
|                                                               |  |  |  |  |  |
| Interest charges1                                             |  $ | 78,457  |  $ | 80,282  |  $ | 71,946  |  $ | 64,720  |  $ | 62,962  |
| Preferred stock dividends of   subsidiaries - gross up - |  |  |  |  |  |
| IDACORP rate                                                  | -  | -  | -  | -  | -  |
| Rental interest factor                                        | 1,004  | 890  | 933  | 1,025  | 1,417  |
| Total fixed charges, as defined                               |  $ | 79,461  |  $ | 81,172  |  $ | 72,879  |  $ | 65,745  |  $ | 64,379  |
|                                                               |  |  |  |  |  |
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                            | 3.02 x | 2.51 x | 2.40 x | 2.61 x | 2.44 x |
|                                                               |  |  |  |  |  |
| 1 FIN 48  interest is not included in interest charges.       |  |  |  |  |  |
|                                                               |  |  |  |  |  |

 

----
§ 315.2 Ineligibility and exceptions. ( a ) *Ineligibility.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, any alien who has requested, applied for, and obtained an exemption from military service on the ground that he or she is an alien shall be ineligible for approval of his or her application for naturalization as a citizen of the United States.
( b ) *Exceptions.* The prohibition in paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to an alien who establishes by clear and convincing evidence that: ( 1 ) At the time that he or she requested an exemption from military service, the applicant had no liability for such service even in the absence of an exemption;
( 2 ) The applicant did not request or apply for the exemption from military service, but such exemption was automatically granted by the United States government;
( 3 ) The exemption from military service was based upon a ground other than the applicant's alienage;
( 4 ) In claiming an exemption from military service, the applicant did not knowingly and intentionally waive his or her eligibility for naturalization because he or she was misled by advice from a competent United States government authority, or from a competent authority of the government of his or her country of nationality, of the consequences of applying for an exemption from military service and was, therefore, unable to make an intelligent choice between exemption and citizenship;
( 5 ) The applicant applied for and received an exemption from military service on the basis of alienage, but was subsequently inducted into the Armed Forces, or the National Security Training Corps, of the United States; however, an applicant who voluntarily enlists in and serves in the Armed Forces of the United States, after applying for and receiving an exemption from military service on the basis of alienage, does not satisfy this exception to paragraph (a) of this section;
( 6 ) Prior to requesting the exemption from military service: ( i ) The applicant was a treaty national who had served in the armed forces of the country of which he or she was a national; however, a treaty national who did not serve in the armed forces of the country of nationality prior to requesting the exemption from military service does not satisfy this exception to paragraph (a) of this section;
( ii ) The applicant served a minimum of eighteen months in the armed forces of a nation that was a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization at the time of the applicant's service; or
( iii ) The applicant served a minimum of twelve months in the armed forces of a nation that was a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization at the time of the applicant's service, provided that the applicant applied for registration with the Selective Service Administration after September 28, 1971; or
( 7 ) The applicant is applying for naturalization pursuant to section 329 of the Act.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 68774 / January 30, 2013

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-14854

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

GMB Capital Management LLC, : Order Appointing

GMB Capital Partners LLC, : Tax Administrator

Gabriel Bitran and Marco Bitran :

 :

Respondent(s). :

____________________________________:

By order dated January 17, 2013, the Commission issued the “Omnibus Order 

Directing the Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that 

Establish Distribution Funds” (“Omnibus Order”), Rel. No. 34-68683, authorizing the 

Secretary to issue orders during calendar years 2013-2015 appointing, upon request by 

the Division of Enforcement staff (“Division”), Damasco and Associates LLP

(“Damasco”), a certified public accounting firm located in Half Moon Bay, California, 

as tax administrator (“Tax Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the 

distribution fund may incur tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund 

(“QSF”) under the Department of the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On January 29, 2013, the Division staff requested, pursuant to the Omnibus 

Order, the appointment of Damasco as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the 

above-referenced proceeding. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Damasco, pursuant to and in accordance with the Omnibus 

Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced 

proceeding. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Elizabeth M. Murphy

Secretary
#### §§ 105.21-105.29 [Reserved]
#### § 1215.2 Purpose.

This part clarifies the provisions which a State must incorporate into its safety belt law to prevent the transfer of a portion of its Federal-aid highway funds to the section 402 highway safety program apportionment, describes notification and transfer procedures, establishes parameters for the use of transferred funds, and provides alternate compliance criteria for New Hampshire and Maine.

[61 FR 28749, June 6, 1996]
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 455 

To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel in the case of 

Richard Arjun Kaul v. Senator Charles Schumer, et al. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 12, 2019 

Mr. MCCONNELL submitted the following resolution; which was considered 

and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize representation by the Senate Legal Counsel 

in the case of Richard Arjun Kaul v. Senator Charles 

Schumer, et al. 

Whereas, Senator Charles Schumer has been named as a defendant in the case of Richard Arjun Kaul v. Senator 

Charles Schumer, et al., Case No. 19–CV–13477–BRM– 

JAD, currently pending in the United States District 

Court for the District of New Jersey; 

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the 

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) 

and 288c(a)(1), the Senate may direct its counsel to defend Members of the Senate in civil actions relating to 

their official responsibilities: Now, therefore, be it 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

SRES 455 ATS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is author2 ized to represent Senator Schumer in the case of Richard 

3 Arjun Kaul v. Senator Charles Schumer, et al. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Notice Recipients

District/Off: 0422−3 User: stehlem Date Created: 8/18/2021

Case: 17−03846−KRH Form ID: pdford9 Total: 1

Recipients of Notice of Electronic Filing:

aty Franklin R. Cragle, III fcragle@hirschlerlaw.com

TOTAL: 1

Case 17-03846-KRH Doc 17-1 Filed 08/18/21 Entered 08/18/21 14:22:26 Desc

Order mailed by BNC: Notice Recipients Page 1 of 1
|   | 1.     | I have reviewed this amendment no. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of H. J. Heinz Company; and                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|   | 2.     | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

| By:     |   | /s/  Paulo Basilio |
|--------------|--------|------------------------------|
| Name:        |   | Paulo Basilio                |
| Title:  |   | Chief Financial Officer      |
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------
                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Herley Industries,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-K for the  fiscal  year  ended  July  31,  2005,  as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Myron
Levy,  Vice  Chairman of the Board and Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,
hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

          (1)  Such Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.


                                Date:     October 31, 2005

                                By:     /s/ Myron Levy
                                        --------------
                                Name:   Myron Levy
                                Title:  Vice Chairman of the Board and
                                        Chief Executive Officer


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Herley Industries,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the  fiscal  year  ended  August  1,  2004,  as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Thomas
V. Gilboy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  hereby certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

          (1)  Such Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.

                                Date:   October 31, 2005

                                By:     /s/ Anello C. Garefino
                                        ----------------------
                                Name:   Anello C. Garefino
                                        Title:    Acting Chief Executive Officer
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 12005S/AFI/DCL/01

**Final Act - II.Declarations - A.Joint Declarations by the present Member States - 1.Joint Declaration on the free movement of workers: Bulgaria***Official Journal L 157 , 21/06/2005 P. 0391 - 0391*

1. Joint declaration on the free movement of workers: Bulgaria

The European Union stresses the strong elements of differentiation and flexibility in the arrangement for the free movement of workers. Member States shall endeavour to grant increased labour market access to Bulgarian nationals under national law, with a view to speeding up the approximation to the acquis. As a consequence, the employment opportunities in the European Union for Bulgarian nationals should improve substantially upon Bulgaria's accession. Moreover, the EU Member States will make best use of the proposed arrangement to move as quickly as possible to the full application of the acquis in the area of free movement of workers.

--------------------------------------------------
#### MONSANTO COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-1283.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 5, 2002.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, SCHALL and LINN, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

*ORDER*

The parties, having jointly moved to dismiss this appeal as moot by virtue of a settlement between the parties that re*709solves the dispute between them, with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and cost.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Q Comm International,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form  10-QSB/A for the period  ending  September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Paul Hickey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/s/ Paul Hickey
-----------------------
Paul Hickey
Chief Executive Officer

June 13, 2003
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of BlastGard International, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the company’s financial condition and results of operations.






Dated: May 23, 2011
By:
/s/ Michael J. GordonMichael J. Gordon, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer