alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 81.13 Submission of reports by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children to designated agencies; designation of agencies.

When the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children receives a report from a provider concerning an apparent violation of Federal child pornography statutes specified in 42 U.S.C. 13032(b)(1), it shall immediately forward that report, to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the United States Postal Inspection Service, and the United States Secret Service, designated pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 13032(b)(2).
"Johnson, Blake" 

<blake.johnson@nebraska.go

v>

09/22/2011 05:44 PM

To Docket-CustomerService@EPA, Group 

A-AND-R-DOCKET@EPA

cc "jon.lipshultz@usdoj.gov" <jon.lipshultz@usdoj.gov>, 

"norman.rave@usdoj.gov" <norman.rave@usdoj.gov>

bcc

Subject Petition for Reconsideration EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491

9 attachments

Exhibit A - Affidavit Michael J. Linder.pdfExhibit B - Declaration of Keith Olsen.pdf

Exhibit C - Declaration of Jack Schreiner.pdfExhibit D - Declaration of Thomas J. Kent.pdf

Exhibit E - Declaration of Jon T. Hansen.pdf Exhibit F - Declaration of Doug Bantam.pdf

Exhibit G - Declaration of Derril Marshall.pdf Exhibit H - Declaration of Marvin H. Schultes.pdf

Petition for Reconsideration.pdf

Attached please find a Petition for Reconsideration on behalf of the State of Nebraska. 

Blake E. Johnson

Assistant Attorney General 

Agriculture, Environment & Natural Resources Section 

2115 State Captiol

Lincoln, NE 68509

(402) 471-1912

blake.johnson@nebraska.gov
<PAGE>   1




















                                 EXHIBIT 10.10













<PAGE>   2
WYANT CORPORATION (logo)


                                                                August 14, 1997.

PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL

Mr. Robert E. Briggs,
President,
Wyant Health Care,
100 Readington Road,
Somerville, N.J.  08876
U.S.A.

Dear Bob,

     This letter will constitute our agreement that (1) if any time during the 
three months following a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the 
Wyant Health Care Division you are terminated without cause by the buyer of 
such assets or (2) if at the time of such sale you decline any offer of 
employment made to you by such buyer, Wyant Corporation will pay you for 
services rendered in an amount equal to one year's salary based on your salary 
level then in effect, such payment to be made on the last day of your 
employment with the Wyant Health Care Division or such buyer as the case may be.

     Nothwithstanding the above, no payment shall be due to you if you resign 
following acceptance of any such offer of employment by such buyer, die or 
become disabled or are terminated for cause by such buyer.

                                                   Yours sincerely,

                                                   WYANT CORPORATION


                                                   Donald C. MacMartin,
                                                   Chairman and Chief
                                                   Executive Officer.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-41015

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALFONSO BARRIENTOS-LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-001-CR-496-ALL

--------------------

June 19, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alfonso Barrientos-Lopez appeals his guilty-plea conviction

for illegal reentry into the United States following deportation,

in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that his indictment

was defective under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments because it did

not allege general intent. 

Barrientos concedes that his argument is foreclosed by Fifth

Circuit precedent, but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme
No. 01-41015

-2-

Court review. Because the indictment in this case alleged a

violation of § 1326, Barrientos’ conviction is AFFIRMED. See

United States v. Berrios-Centeno, 250 F.3d 294, 299-300 (5th

Cir.), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 288 (2001). 

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 72181 / May 16, 2014

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-15507

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

 :

JPMorgan Chase & Co., : EXTENSION ORDER

:

Respondent. :

____________________________________:

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested a second extension of time,

until September 30, 2014, to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution under Rule 1101(a) of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans.

On September 19, 2013, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist 

Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making 

Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”) against JPMorgan Chase & Co. 

(“JPMorgan”).1 The Order required JPMorgan to pay a civil money penalty in the amount of 

$200,000,000 to the Commission and ordered that such penalty may be distributed pursuant to 

Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended. 

On October 30, 2013, the Commission issued an order granting the Division’s first 

request for an extension of time.2 Since that time, the Commission has issued an Order 

Establishing a Fair Fund,3 and has issued an Order Appointing Fund Plan Administrator and 

Setting Administrator Bond Amount.

4 The appointed Fund Plan Administrator, RCB Fund 

Services, LLC, has hired an expert who is working on determining the class of injured 

 1 See Exchange Act Rel. No. 70458 (Sep. 19, 2013). 2 See Exchange Act Rel. No. 70780 (Oct. 30, 2013). 3 See Exchange Act Rel. No. 71654 (Mar. 5, 2014). 4 See Exchange Act Rel. No. 71825 (Mar. 27, 2014).
2

investors and the extent of their damages, in order to develop a plan of allocation. After the

plan of allocation is developed, a plan of distribution must be written. 

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s 

request for an extension of time, until September 30, 2014, to submit a Proposed Plan of 

Distribution is granted.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority. 

Lynn M. Powalski

Deputy Secretary
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NO VEMBER 1, 2017

NO. 03

- 17

- 00559

- CV

I. R., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFOR E CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON A ND GOODWIN

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the final decree of termination signed by the tr i a l court on

August 24, 2017. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that

there was no reversible error in the trial court’s final decree of termination . Theref ore, the C ourt

affirms the trial court’s final decree of termination

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to

pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
§ 241.3 Detention of aliens during removal period. ( a ) *Assumption of custody.* Once the removal period defined in section 241(a)(1) of the Act begins, an alien in the United States will be taken into custody pursuant to the warrant of removal.
( b ) *Cancellation of bond.* Any bond previously posted will be canceled unless it has been breached or is subject to being breached.
( c ) *Judicial stays.* The filing of (or intention to file) a petition or action in a Federal court seeking review of the issuance or execution of an order of removal shall not delay execution of the Warrant of Removal except upon an affirmative order of the court.
( d ) *Information regarding detainees.* Disclosure of information relating to detainees shall be governed by the provisions of 8 CFR 236.3.
[62 FR 10378, Mar. 6, 1997, as amended at 70 FR 673, Jan. 5, 2005]
GREEN POWER ENTERPRISES, INC.

 


	
                         
 	
      _____________ ___, 2007
 




Brasilinvest Group 

Av Brig. Faria Lima

1485-19 Andar

Brasilinvest Plaza CEP 01452-002

Sao Paulo, Brazil

Gentlemen:

This letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (“Effective Date”) of the registration statement for the initial public offering (“IPO”) of the securities of Green Power Enterprises, Inc. (“GPE”) and continuing until the earlier of the consummation by GPE of a “Business Combination” (as described in GPE’s IPO prospectus) or GPE’s liquidation (the “Termination Date”), Brasilinvest Group shall make available to GPE certain office and secretarial services as may be required by GPE from time to time, situated at Av Brig. Faria Lima, 1485-19 Andar, Brasilinvest Plaza CEP 01452-002, Sao Paulo, Brazil. In exchange therefore, GPE shall pay Brasilinvest Group the sum of $10,000 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date.

 


	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                        Very truly yours,
 
	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                         
 
	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                        GREEN POWER ENTERPRISES, INC.
 
	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                         
 
	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                         
 	
      By: 
 	
                          
 
	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                        Name: 
 
	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                         
 	
  Title: 
 




 



	
                        AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:
 	
                         
 	
                         
 
	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                         
 
	
                        BRASILINVEST GROUP
 	
                         
 	
                         
 
	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                         
 
	
      By: 
 	
                          
 	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                         
 
	
                         
 	
                        Name: 
 	
                         
 	
                         
 	
                         
 
	
                         
 	
                        Title:
Certificate Number: 14912-VAE-DE-031323997

Bankruptcy Case Number: 18-12376

14912-VAE-DE-031323997

CERTIFICATE OF DEBTOR EDUCATION

I CERTIFY that on July 15, 2018, at 7:29 o'clock PM EDT, Alice Thomas

completed a course on personal financial management given by internet by 001

Debtoredu LLC, a provider approved pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 111 to provide an

instructional course concerning personal financial management in the Eastern

District of Virginia.

Date: July 15, 2018 By: /s/Jai Bhatt

Name: Jai Bhatt

Title: Counselor

Case 18-12376-KHK Doc 18 Filed 07/17/18 Entered 07/17/18 12:58:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
P.1 

RCRA Box 321 

Prepped by Ryan Dugan 

Document Number: 

226) OGRC-S0020 

Docket Number: 

F-93-OGRC-FFFFF 

Printed 5/8/2007 3:36:32 PM Sheet 226 of 259 
P.2 

OG-RC-sooao 

ATTORNEYS 

A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING 

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 

ANNA MARIE WOOD 

(713) 226-0634 

PORTER & CLEMENTS 

NCNB CENTER 

700 LOUISIANA, SUITE 3500 

HOUSTON, TEXAS 7700S-S730 

TELEPHONE(713) 226-0600 

TELEC0PIER(7I3J 228-1331 

TELECOPIER(713) 224-4835 

TELECOPIER(713) 236-9632 

TELEX 775-348 

MAILING ADDRESS: 

P.O.BOX 4744 

HOUSTON,TX 77210-4744 

BOH15\001 

September 24, 1990 

Mr. Dan Derkics 

Office of Solid Waste & 

Emergency Response - Waste 

Management Division - Special 

Waste Branch 

The United States Environmental 

Protection Agency 

Mail Code 0S-323 

401 M Street, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20460 

Re: Meeting with representatives of Waste Crude Oil 

Reclaimers 

Dear Dan: 

Thank you for taking the time to meet with us last week. 

It was good to finally meet with you to talk about the dilemma 

facing the Texas and New Mexico waste crude oil reclaimers. We are 

currently working through additional channels to try and obtain 

what we believe to be the proper resolution of the issues we 

discussed during the meeting. In the meantime, if you have any 

additional guestions please do not hesitate to contact me or Paul 

Bohannon. Once again thank you for your time and attention to this 

matter. 

Very truly yours, 

U/VLfUGLAnna Marie Wood 

AMW\t 

C:\DOCS\BOH15001\005 

cc: Mr. Paul Bohannon
#### § 101.62 Designation of hearing examiner.

The designation of the hearing examiner as presiding officer shall be in writing, and shall specify whether the examiner is to make an initial decision or to certify the entire record including his recommended findings and proposed decision to the reviewing authority, and may also fix the time and place of hearing. A copy of such order shall be served on all parties. After service of an order designating a hearing examiner to preside, and until such examiner makes his decision, motions and petitions shall be submitted to him. In the case of the death, illness, disqualification or unavailability of the designated hearing examiner, another hearing examiner may be designated to take his place.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven McKELVEY, a/k/a C, a/k/a Custard, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven McKelvey, a/k/a C, a/k/a Custard, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 01-4621, 01-4701.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2002.

Decided May 24, 2002.

Andrew D. Grimes, Summerville, South Carolina, for Appellant. J. Strom Thurmond, Jr., United States Attorney, E. Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

No. 01-4621 affirmed and No. 01-4701 dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Steven McKelvey was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to knowingly possess *960with intent to distribute fifty grams or more of crack cocaine, 21 U.S.C.A. § 846 (West 1999), and possession with intent to distribute five grams or more of crack cocaine, 21 U.S.C.A. § 841 (West 1999 & Supp.2001), and aiding and abetting possession of crack cocaine, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2 (West 1999 & Supp.2001). He was sentenced to life imprisonment on the conspiracy count and ten years imprisonment on the possession count, to be served concurrently.

In No. 01-4621, McKelvey contends that the Government presented insufficient evidence to prove he was involved in a conspiracy rather than a simple “buyer-seller” relationship, and failed to prove he possessed five grams or more of cocaine base on March 22, 2000. Based on our review of the joint appendix, these claims are meritless. *See Glasser v. United States,*315 U.S. 60, 80, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942); *United States v. Mills,*995 F.2d 480, 484-85 (4th Cir.1993) (discussing distinction between conspiracy and buyer-seller relationship); 18 U.S.C.A. § 2. Accordingly, we affirm the conviction and sentence.

In No. 01-4701, McKelvey filed a notice of appeal addressing the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). His counseled brief abandons this appeal as without merit. Moreover, Rule 59(e) does not apply to criminal proceedings. We therefore dismiss this appeal.

We affirm Washington’s convictions and sentences. We dismiss McKelvey’s appeal of the motion for reconsideration. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

No. *01-4621*— AFFIRMED.

No. *01-4701*— DISMISSED.
EXHIBIT 23(b)
NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”),provides that if part of a registration statement at the time it becomeseffective contains an untrue statement of a material fact, or omits a materialfact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements thereinnot misleading, any person acquiring a security pursuant to such registrationstatement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition such personknew of such untruth or omission) may assert a claim against, among others, anaccountant who has consented to be named as having certified any part of theregistration statement or as having prepared any report for use in connectionwith the registration statement.
On August 5, 2002, Guilford Mills, Inc. (the “Company”) terminated theengagement of its independent certified public accountants, Arthur Andersen LLP(“Andersen”), and engaged the services of Grant Thornton LLP (“Grant Thornton”)as its new independent auditors.
After reasonable efforts, the Company has been unable to obtain ArthurAndersen’s written consent to the incorporation by reference into the Company’sregistration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-105954) and the relatedprospectuses (the “Registration Statement”) of Arthur Andersen’s audit reportdated January 14, 2002, with respect to the Company’s consolidated financialstatements as of September 30, 2001 and for the two years in the period thenended.
Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities Act permits theCompany to file this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated byreference into the Registration Statement, without a written consent fromArthur Andersen. As a result, with respect to purchases of the Company’ssecurities pursuant to the Registration Statement that occur subsequent to thedate this Annual Report on Form 10-K is filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, Arthur Andersen will not have any liability under Section 11(a) ofthe Securities Act for any untrue statements of a material fact contained inthe financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen or any omissions of amaterial fact required to be stated therein. Accordingly, you would be unableto assert a claim against Arthur Andersen under Section 11(a) of the SecuritiesAct.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
of The Hertz Corporation on Form S-3 (File No. 333-34501) of our report dated
January 22, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of The Hertz Corporation as of December 31, 1997
and 1996, and for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 which report
is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
                                          COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
 
Parsippany, New Jersey
March 20, 1998
§ 222.104 When does the Assistant Secretary consider a complaint received? ( a ) The Assistant Secretary considers a complaint to have been received only after the Assistant Secretary determines that the complaint— ( 1 ) Satisfies the requirements in §§ 222.102 and 222.103; and
( 2 ) Is in writing and signed by the tribal chairman or the tribe's authorized designee.
( b ) If the Assistant Secretary determines that a complaint fails to meet the requirements in §§ 222.102-222.103, the Assistant Secretary notifies the tribe or its designee in writing that the complaint has been dismissed for purposes of invoking the hearing procedures in §§ 222.102-222.113.
( c ) Any notification that a complaint has been dismissed includes the reasons why the Assistant Secretary determined that the complaint did not meet the requirements in §§ 222.102 and 222.103.
( d ) Notification that a complaint has been dismissed does not preclude other efforts to investigate or resolve the issues raised in the complaint, including the filing of an amended complaint.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7704(e)(1))
- , - ^ ^ ——, U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSFORATIO N

. FEDERA LAVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N K •

I n th e Matte r

of: AI REVAC , INC . [sic ] FA A CAS ENO. : 2007CE03000 8 y . «»';/ '



# '^ y

HEARIN GDAT E REQUES T Th e undersigne dcounse l for th e Responden t

i s plannin g t o b e o n an out-of-stat e vacatio n for

afamil y reunio n fromJun e 9 , 201 0 throug hJun e 18 , 201 0 an dtherefor e request s tha t

th e hearin g not

b e schedule dunti l Jun e 28 , 201 0 at th e earliest . Respectfull y submitted , COOLIN G& BERBER S

Street , Suit e 240 0 Kansa s City , M O 6410 5 Telephone : (816)474-077 7 Facsimile : (816)472-079 0 iramsev(a),coolinglaw.co m ATTORNEY S FO RRESPONDEN T AI REVA C EMS , INC .

2007CE03000 8>- - •'^- *

I CERTIFICAT EO FSERVIC E I hereb y certif

y tha t o n th e y'da y o f

Ma y 2010, 1 forwarde dth e origina l an don e (1 ) cop y o f

th e foregoin g Hearin g Dat e Reques t vi aUnite dState s Mail , Certified , Retur n Receip t Requeste dto : Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Wilbu r Wrigh t Building , Suit e 2W100 0 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Additionall y on e (1 ) cop y o f th e foregoin g Answe r

t o Complain t

was forwarde d viaUnite dState s mail , certified , return receip t requeste dto : Mar k G . Camach o Senio r Enforcemen t

Attorne y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Offic e o f Regiona l Counse l 90 1 Locust , Roo m50 6 Kansa s City , M O 64106-264 1

F:\Cases\FA A ENFORCEMEN T ACTIONS\AI REVAC\Pleadings\2007CE030008\Hearin g Dat e Request.Apri l 30.2010.do c

FA A CAS E NO. : 2007CE03000 8
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB ofVisualMED Clinical Solutions(the Company) for the
quarter ended March 31st, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Larry Kurlender, Principal Financial
Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | /s/ Larry Kurlender                   
| | --------------------------------------
| |                                       
| | Larry Kurlender                       
| | Principal Financial Officer, Principal
| | Accounting Officer and Treasurer      
| |                                       
| | May 14th, 2007                        

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78r), as amended.

---