alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 104.14 Preemployment inquiries. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, a recipient may not conduct a preemployment medical examination or may not make preemployment inquiry of an applicant as to whether the applicant is a handicapped person or as to the nature or severity of a handicap. A recipient may, however, make preemployment inquiry into an applicant's ability to perform job-related functions.
( b ) When a recipient is taking remedial action to correct the effects of past discrimination pursuant to § 104.6 (a), when a recipient is taking voluntary action to overcome the effects of conditions that resulted in limited participation in its federally assisted program or activity pursuant to § 104.6(b), or when a recipient is taking affirmative action pursuant to section 503 of the Act, the recipient may invite applicants for employment to indicate whether and to what extent they are handicapped, *Provided,* That: ( 1 ) The recipient states clearly on any written questionnaire used for this purpose or makes clear orally if no written questionnaire is used that the information requested is intended for use solely in connection with its remedial action obligations or its voluntary or affirmative action efforts; and
( 2 ) The recipient states clearly that the information is being requested on a voluntary basis, that it will be kept confidential as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, that refusal to provide it will not subject the applicant or employee to any adverse treatment, and that it will be used only in accordance with this part.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall prohibit a recipient from conditioning an offer of employment on the results of a medical examination conducted prior to the employee's entrance on duty, *Provided,* That: ( 1 ) All entering employees are subjected to such an examination regardless of handicap, and
( 2 ) The results of such an examination are used only in accordance with the requirements of this part.
( d ) Information obtained in accordance with this section as to the medical condition or history of the applicant shall be collected and maintained on separate forms that shall be accorded confidentiality as medical records, except that: ( 1 ) Supervisors and managers may be informed regarding restrictions on the work or duties of handicapped persons and regarding necessary accommodations;
( 2 ) First aid and safety personnel may be informed, where appropriate, if the condition might require emergency treatment; and
( 3 ) Government officials investigating compliance with the Act shall be provided relevant information upon request.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 93320 / October 14, 2021

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-19991

In the Matter of

William D. King, CPA

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

EXTENSION ORDER

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested an extension of time until July 

31, 2022 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution under Rule 1101(a) of the Commission’s 

Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(a).

On September 11, 2020, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Administrative and 

Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities Exchange 

Act of 1934, Sections 203(f) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and Section 

9(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial 

Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order (the “Order”)1 against William D. King, CPA (“King” 

or the “Respondent”). In the Order, the Commission found that from August 2015 through 

September 2018, King solicited clients to invest in a penny stock issuer, American Rebel 

Holdings, Inc. (“AREB”). King did not disclose that he received $72,250 in AREB shares as a 

commission for soliciting sales nor that he retained $447,384 in AREB shares as fees. The 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 89848 (Sept. 11, 2020).
2

Commission also found that King operated as a broker-dealer through his solicitation of 

investors and other activities without registering to do so. 

The Commission ordered the Respondent to pay $519,634.00 in disgorgement, 

$33,388.13 in prejudgment interest, and a $75,000.00 civil money penalty, for a total of 

$628,022.13, to the Commission, pursuant to the payment plan detailed therein. The 

Commission also created a Fair Fund, pursuant to Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 

2002, so the penalty paid, along with the disgorgement and interest paid, can be distributed to 

harmed investors (the “Fair Fund”).

The Fair Fund consists of the $628,022.13 paid by the Respondent. The Fair Fund has 

been deposited in an interest-bearing account at the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Bureau of 

the Fiscal Service, and any accrued interest will be for the benefit of the Fair Fund.

In its request for an extension of time, the Division states that additional time is needed to 

locate and verify contact information for investors, compile investor records, complete the fund 

administrator solicitation and appointment process, develop the distribution methodology, and 

develop the plan of distribution.

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s 

request for an extension of time until July 31, 2022 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution is 

granted. 

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.2

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

2

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(i).
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Manouch Moshayedi, certify that:

1. I have reviewed
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of STEC, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other
certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                   |  |                         |  | 
|------------------ |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Date: May 15, 2007 |  | /s/ MANOUCH MOSHAYEDI   |  | 
|                   |  | Manouch Moshayedi       |  | 
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer |  |
1 **Example Form –**  **CWA 316(b) Annual Report EPA Regulations**  **– 40 CFR 125 Subparts I, J and N** 

**Example Data Entry Form** [ **Note:** Users will also be able to batch this data into this form via a spreadsheet or CSV file. ] NPDES Number <system generated> Start Date of Reporting Period (YYYY- MM - DD) End Date of Reporting Period (YYYY- MM - DD) NPDES Data Group Number 10 <system generated> **I. INTAKE VELOCITY MONITORING COMPLIANCE**  **INFORMATION** Velocity Monitoring - Compliance with the Velocity Requirements Velocity Monitoring - Compliance with the Velocity Requirements : The unique code/description indicating whether or not the facility is in compliance with the velocity requirement for each permitted cooling water intake structure. 1 = new facility is in com pliance with the Maximum Through -Screen Design Intake Velocity of 0.5 fps as require under 125.84(b)(2) or (c)(1) or 125.134(b)(2), 2 = new facility is reducing the level of adverse environmental impact to a comparable level as require under 125.84(d) or 1 25.134(c)(1), 3 = new facility is in compliance with alternative requirements as outlined in 125.85 or 125.135, 4 = existing facility if veloci ty monitoring is required, is in compliance with the maximum design intake velocity of 0.5 fps, the maximum actua l through screen velocity of 0.5 fps, or an alternative requirements established by the Director. A value of zero means the facility is not subject to 125 Sub part I, J, or N and is in compliance with the limits based on BPJ.2 

### Standard Signature Block and Certification Statement for CWA Reporting (in compliance with CFR Parts 3, 122.22, and 127). **II. CWA 316(**  **b ) BIOLOGICAL MONITOR**  **ING INFORMATION**  **CW A 316(b) Biological Monitoring**  **-**

**Species Name (pick list)**  **CWA 316(b) Biological Monitoring -**  **Species Number CWA 316(b) Biological Monitoring**  **- Thre** **atened or Endangered Flag CWA 316(b) Biological Monitoring**  **- Species Impinged and**  **Entrained**

CWA 316(b) Biological Monitoring - Species Name : For new and existing facilities, a listing of each species (or relevant taxa) for all life stages in the vicinity of the cooling water intake structure. CWA 316(b) Biological Monitoring - Species Number : For new and existing facilities, the number of each species (or relevant taxa) in the vicinity of the cooling water intake structure. CWA 316(b) Biological Monitoring - Threatened or Endangered Flag : For new and existing facilities, a unique code/description that describes for each species (or relevant taxa) whether the species is threatened, endangered, or is an otherwise protected spe cies that might be susceptible to impingement and entrainment at the facility’s cooling water intake structures. CWA 316(b) Biological Monitoring - Species Impinged and Entrained : For new and existing facilities, the number of each species (or relevant taxa) impinged and entrained per year in the vicinity of the cooling water intake structure.

SUBMIT REPORT
#### Aiken *v.*Reynolds.

February 18, 1910.

Action for damages. Before Judge Lewis. Greene superior court.

January 4, 1909.

*Pari• & Parle,*for plaintiff in error. *Hiles W. Lewis,*contra.

Lumpkin, J.

None of the charges to which exceptions were taken were erroneous for any of the reasons assigned. The entire charge presented the case fully, and was quite as fair to the defendant as it should have been. The evidence authorized the verdict, and there was no error in refusing to grant a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Jusliees concur.*
Exhibit 23.1

Consent  of  Independent  Registered  Public  Accounting  Firm
We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference in Registration Statement No.
333-38722  on Form S-3 and Registration Nos. 333-39822 and 333-42356 on Form S-8
of  our  reports  dated  March  21, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial
statements  of  Green Mountain Power Corporation, and management's report on the
effectiveness  of  internal control over financial reporting (which expresses an
unqualified  opinion  on  management's  assessment and an adverse opinion on the
effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting because
of  a  material weakness), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Green
Mountain  Power  Corporation  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2004.


/s/DELOITTE  &  TOUCHE  LLP
Boston,  Massachusetts
March  21,  2005
# Official Journal C 141A/25 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 141A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4725 May 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 141A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4725 May 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Corrigenda |
| | |
| 2004/C 141A/1 | Corrigendum to Notice of open competition EPSO/A/17/04 to constitute a reserve pool of administrators (A 7/A 6) in the specialist fields of research | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

Corrigenda

2004/C 141A/1

Corrigendum to Notice of open competition EPSO/A/17/04 to constitute a reserve pool of administrators (A 7/A 6) in the specialist fields of research

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Water-level altitudes ... andwater-level changes in the Chicot, Evangeline, and Jasper aquifers andcompaction 1973-... in the Chicot and Evangeline aquifers, Houston-Galvestonregion, Texas /**
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.91/3:C 43/

Item Number:0619-G-33 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000999633
 
2002| 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019
 
March 3, 2020
§ 101.72 Evidentiary purpose. ( a ) The hearing is directed to receiving factual evidence and expert opinion testimony related to the issues in the proceeding. Argument will not be received in evidence; rather it should be presented in statements, memoranda, or briefs, as determined by the presiding officer. Brief opening statements, which shall be limited to statement of the party's position and what he intends to prove, may be made at hearings.
( b ) Hearings for the reception of evidence will be held only in cases where issues of fact must be resolved in order to determine whether the respondent has failed to comply with one or more applicable requirements of part 100 of this title. In any case where it appears from the respondent's answer to the notice of hearing or opportunity for hearing, from his failure timely to answer, or from his admissions or stipulations in the record, that there are no matters of material fact in dispute, the reviewing authority or presiding officer may enter an order so finding, vacating the hearing date if one has been set, and fixing the time for filing briefs under § 101.101. Thereafter the proceedings shall go to conclusion in accordance with subpart J of this part. The presiding officer may allow an appeal from such order in accordance with § 101.86.
# Official Journal L 86/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.086.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 86 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5524 March 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.086.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 86

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5524 March 2012

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2012 on short selling and certain aspects of credit default swaps (1) | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2012 on short selling and certain aspects of credit default swaps (1)

1

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 596/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 adapting a number of instruments subject to the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty to Council Decision 1999/468/EC with regard to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny — Adaptation to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny — Part Four (OJ L 188, 18.7.2009) | 25 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 596/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 adapting a number of instruments subject to the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty to Council Decision 1999/468/EC with regard to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny — Adaptation to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny — Part Four (OJ L 188, 18.7.2009)

(OJ L 188, 18.7.2009)

25

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File
Nos. 333-109955 and 333-57138) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-32543, 333-60311, 333-80457 and
333-32868) of The Hertz Corporation of our report dated March 4, 2009 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedules and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Florham Park, New Jersey
March 4, 2009


---



QuickLinks
#### Irwin Weinstein, Respondent, v. Lewis Allinson et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
### §587. Repealed. June 19, 1934, ch. 648, title II, §1, 48 Stat. 1056

Section, act Mar. 31, 1933, ch. 17, §3, 48 Stat. 23, extended benefits of Federal Employees Compensation Act to employees under this subchapter.
# C_2015055EN.01000401.xml

| 14.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 February 2015

(2015/C 55/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1381 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,46 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4440 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,74010 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5887 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0576 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6535 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,640 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 306,03 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1768 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4431 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8105 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4689 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4235 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8264 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5312 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5439 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 251,51 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,3430 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1011 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,7128 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 566,04 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0683 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 50,424 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 72,9890 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,131 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2395 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,0348 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,7557 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1381

JPY

Japanese yen

135,46

DKK

Danish krone

7,4440

GBP

Pound sterling

0,74010

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5887

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0576

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6535

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,640

HUF

Hungarian forint

306,03

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1768

RON

Romanian leu

4,4431

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8105

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4689

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4235

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8264

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5312

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5439

KRW

South Korean won

1 251,51

ZAR

South African rand

13,3430

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1011

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,7128

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 566,04

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0683

PHP

Philippine peso

50,424

RUB

Russian rouble

72,9890

THB

Thai baht

37,131

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2395

MXN

Mexican peso

17,0348

INR

Indian rupee

70,7557

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-60665

Summary Calendar

GURGIT SINGH, also known as Jurgit Singh,

Petitioner,

versus.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. Attorney General,

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of

the Board of Immigration Appeals

No. A 200 239 148

Before SMITH, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gurgit Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 23, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-60665 Document: 00512709368 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/23/2014
No. 13-60665

decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the decision of 

an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) to deny Singh’s request for asylum and withholding of removal. The IJ recited numerous inconsistencies upon which he based 

his credibility finding, and the BIA recounted many of those inconsistencies in 

its decision. Singh has not shown that the totality of the circumstances underlying the credibility finding, as explained by the IJ and BIA, compels a different 

conclusion. See Wang v. Holder, 569 F.3d 531, 538 (5th Cir. 2009). 

The petition is DENIED.

2

 Case: 13-60665 Document: 00512709368 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/23/2014
#### § 750.109 Exclusions.

The standards in this part shall not apply to markers, signs and plaques in appreciation of sites of historical significance for the erection of which provisions are made in an agreement between a State and the Secretary of Transportation, as provided in the Act, unless such agreement expressly makes all or any part of the standards applicable.