alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 231.1 Electronic manifest and I-94 requirement for passengers and crew onboard arriving vessels and aircraft. ( a ) *Electronic submission of manifests.* Provisions setting forth requirements applicable to commercial carriers regarding the electronic transmission of arrival manifests covering passengers and crew members under section 231 of the Act are set forth in 19 CFR 4.7b (passengers and crew members onboard vessels) and in 19 CFR 122.49a (passengers onboard aircraft) and 122.49b (crew members onboard aircraft).
( b ) *Submission of Form I-94* — ( 1 ) *General requirement.* In addition to the electronic manifest transmission requirement specified in paragraph (a) of this section, and subject to the exception of paragraph (2) of this paragraph (b), the master or commanding officer, or authorized agent, owner or consignee, of each commercial vessel or aircraft arriving in the United States from any place outside the United States must present to a Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer at the port of entry a properly completed Arrival/Departure Record, Form I-94 (see § 1.4), for each arriving passenger.
( 2 ) *Exceptions.* The Form I-94 requirement of paragraph (1) of this paragraph (b) does not apply to United States citizens, lawful permanent residents of the United States, immigrants to the United States, or passengers in transit through the United States; nor does it apply to vessels or aircraft arriving directly from Canada on a trip originating in that country or arriving in the Virgin Islands of the United States directly from a trip originating in the British Virgin Islands.
( c ) *Progressive clearance.* Inspection of arriving passengers may be deferred at the request of the carrier to an onward port of debarkation. However, verification of transmission of the electronic manifest referred to in paragraph (a) of this section must occur at the first port of arrival. Authorization for this progressive clearance may be granted by the Director, Field Operations, at the first port of arrival. When progressive clearance is requested, the carrier must present the Form I-92 referred to in paragraph (d) of this section in duplicate at the initial port of entry. The original Form I-92 will be processed at the initial port of entry, and the duplicate will be noted and returned to the carrier for presentation at the onward port of debarkation.
( d ) *Aircraft/Vessel Report.* A properly completed Aircraft/Vessel Report, Form I-92, must be completed for each arriving aircraft and vessel that is transporting passengers. Submission of the Form I-92 to the CBP officer must be accomplished on the day of arrival.
[70 FR 17849, Apr. 7, 2005, as amended at 78 FR 18472, Mar. 27, 2013]
Case 18-73980-FJS Doc Filed 09/09/21 Entered 09/09/21 10:00:09 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 6
Case 18-73980-FJS Doc Filed 09/09/21 Entered 09/09/21 10:00:09 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 6
Case 18-73980-FJS Doc Filed 09/09/21 Entered 09/09/21 10:00:09 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 6
Case 18-73980-FJS Doc Filed 09/09/21 Entered 09/09/21 10:00:09 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 6
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

NORFOLK DIVISION 

In Re: Case No. 18-73980-FJS

Christopher J. Branch Chapter 13

Debtor. Chief Judge Frank J. Santoro

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that on September 9, 2021, a copy of the foregoing Notice of Mortgage Payment Change 

was filed electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent to the following party/parties through 

the Court’s ECF System. Party/Parties may access this filing through the Court’s system: 

Christopher M. Baker, Debtors’ Counsel 

ecf@bolemanlaw.com 

John Russell Bollinger, Debtors’ Counsel 

ecf@bolemanlaw.com 

Matthew R. Hahne, Debtors’ Counsel 

ecf@bolemanlaw.com 

Kathryne Mary Rose Shaw, Debtors’ Counsel 

ecf@bolemanlaw.com 

R. Clinton Stackhouse, Jr., Chapter 13 Trustee 

bcourt@rcsch13.com 

Office of the United States Trustee 

ustpregion04.no.ecf@usdoj.gov 

Case 18-73980-FJS Doc Filed 09/09/21 Entered 09/09/21 10:00:09 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 6
I further certify that on September 9, 2021, a copy of the foregoing Notice of Mortgage Payment 

Change was mailed by first-class U.S. Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed to the 

following: 

Christopher J. Branch, Debtor 

 3708 Old Forge Road 

 Virginia Beach, VA 23452 

Dated: September 9, 2021 /s/ D. Anthony Sottile

 D. Anthony Sottile 

Authorized Agent for Creditor 

Sottile & Barile, LLC 

394 Wards Corner Road, Suite 180 

Loveland, OH 45140 

Phone: 513.444.4100 

Email: bankruptcy@sottileandbarile.com

Case 18-73980-FJS Doc Filed 09/09/21 Entered 09/09/21 10:00:09 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 6
Case 18-01093-KHK Doc 15-2 Filed 10/09/18 Entered 10/09/18 16:55:27 Desc

 Exhibit(s) Page 1 of 2
Case 18-01093-KHK Doc 15-2 Filed 10/09/18 Entered 10/09/18 16:55:27 Desc

 Exhibit(s) Page 2 of 2
§ 392.4 Issuance of a certificate of citizenship. ( a ) *Approval of application.* When an application for posthumous citizenship under this part has been approved, USCIS will issue a Certificate of Citizenship to the applicant in the name of the decedent.
( b ) *Delivery of certificate.* Delivery of the Certificate of Citizenship shall be made by registered mail to the address designated by the applicant. If the applicant resides outside the United States, the certificate shall be sent by registered mail to the Service office abroad, if one is located where delivery is to be made; otherwise, it shall be forwarded to the nearest American Embassy or Consulate.
( c ) *Effective date of citizenship.* Where the Service has approved an Application for Posthumous Citizenship (Form N-644), the decedent shall be considered a United States citizen as of the date of his or her death.
( d ) *Ineligibility for immigration benefits.* The granting of posthumous citizenship under section 329A of the Immigration and Naturalization Act, as amended, and issuance of a certificate under paragraph (a) of this section, shall not entitle the surviving spouse, parent, son, daughter, or other relative of the decedent to any benefit under any provision of the Act. Nor shall such grant make applicable the provisions of section 319(d) of the Act to the surviving spouse.
( e ) *Replacement certificate.* An application for a replacement Certificate of Citizenship must be submitted on the form designated by USCIS with the fee specified in 8 CFR 106.2 and in accordance with the form instructions.
[56 FR 22822, May 17, 1991, as amended at 76 FR 53806, Aug. 29, 2011; 85 FR 46929, Aug. 3, 2020]
**Exhibit 32.1**     DAC TECHNOLOGIES GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) ORRULE 15d-14(c) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350     Inconnection with this first amendment to the Quarterly Report on Form10-QSB/A-1 of DAC Technologies Group InternationalInc (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), David A. Collins, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.              /s/ David A. Collins   David A. Collins, Chairman, CEO and Principal Executive Officer      Date:August 16, 2007
###### Editorial Note on Part 1240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1240 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10355, Mar. 3, 2003.

#### §§ 1240.27-1240.29 [Reserved]
# CA2005133EN.01000101.xml

| 31.5.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 133/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 133/1

---

Publication of a vacancy for

DIRECTOR

(Grade A*14) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations)

COM/2005/1695

(2005/C 133 A/01)

The Commission is seeking to appoint a Director for Security in the Directorate-General for Personnel and Administration.

Applicants must be a citizen of one of the Member States of the European Union.

The senior official will be selected and appointed by the Commission according to its selection and recruitment procedures. Salaries and conditions of employment are those laid down in the Staff Regulations for A*14 grade officials of the European Communities. The Commission applies an equal opportunities policy.

If you want to apply, you must register via the Internet by going to the website http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/personnel_administration/seniormanagementvacancies/index_fr.html and following the instructions concerning the various stages of the procedure. Please note that you must have an e-mail address; this will be used to identify your registration. The closing date for registration is 1 July 2005. On-line registration will not be possible after 12 noon Brussels time.

---
LEASE EXPIRATION AMENDMENT

     THIS LEASE  AMENDMENT,  dated 13 November 96 by and between  Centoff Realty
Co.. Inc..  Delaware  Corporation  ("Landlord") with its principal office at 522
Fifth Avenue. New York. NY 10036, and AZIMUTH. INC.. a corporation organized and
existing  under the laws of the  State of South  Carolina,  ("Tenant")  with its
principal office at 9229 University Blvd. Charleston. S.C. 29461

                                   WITNESSETH

     In  consideration  of$4,961.00  in hand paid by the Tenant to the Landlord.
the  receipt of which is hereby  acknowledged.  it is  mutually  agreed  between
Landlord and Tenant that the Lease dated 06 April 95 for space designated as 236
comprising approximately 1108 square feet, located at 100 Executive Center Drive
is hereby  amended to change the  expiration  date of the Term to be October 31,
1996.

     Any  options to renew or extend the term and any  automatic  extensions  of
hereby canceled and are of no further force and effect.

     1.  Security  deposit  in the  amount of  $414.00  to be  forfeited  to the
Landlord.








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF.  the Landlord and the Tenant have executed or caused to
be executed  this  Amendment  on the dates shown  below their  signatures  to be
effective as of the date set forth above.

Tenant:    AZIMUTH, INC.                   Landlord: Centoff  Realty Co.. Inc.
By
By: Koger Equity, Inc.  as Agent
  (SEAL)
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Edgar Kenny against William A. Adams, as Warden of the City Prison of the City of New York.

Present •—Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.
#### §§ 334.6-334.10 [Reserved]
#### § 339.4 Binding of naturalization records.

Whenever a volume of petitions for naturalization, applications to take the oath of allegiance, declarations of intention, orders of court, or other documents affecting or relating to the naturalization of persons is completed, it shall be bound and locked by the clerk of court.

[22 FR 9825, Dec. 6, 1957]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDWARD P. KAKALIA, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

STATE OF HAWAII; DAVID Y. IGE, in 

his capacity of current Governor of The 

State of Hawaii, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 19-55571 

D.C. No. 8:18-cv-02149-JLS-DFM 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 2, 2020**

Before: LEAVY, SILVERMAN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Edward P. Kakalia appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims arising out of the alleged 

improper taking of land in Hawaii. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-55571 

We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for lack of subject matter 

jurisdiction. Crum v. Circus Circus Enters., 231 F.3d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir. 2000). 

We may affirm on any basis supported by the record. Thompson v. Paul, 547 F.3d 

1055, 1058-59 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm.

Dismissal of Kakalia’s action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under 

the local action doctrine was proper because Kakalia’s action concerned real 

property in Hawaii over which the district court in the Central District of California 

had no jurisdiction. See Eldee-K Rental Props., LLC v. DIRECTV, Inc., 748 F.3d 

943, 946-47 (9th Cir. 2014) (explaining that under the local action doctrine, district 

courts generally have exclusive jurisdiction over actions to recover title or 

possession of property in the forum where that property is located).

In light of our disposition, we do not consider the parties’ remaining 

arguments regarding Eleventh Amendment immunity, the statute of limitations, 

and failure to state a claim. 

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Kakalia leave to 

amend because amendment would have been futile. See Gordon v. City of 

Oakland, 627 F.3d 1092, 1094 (9th Cir. 2010) (setting forth standard of review and 

explaining that leave to amend may be denied if amendment would be futile).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Kakalia’s motion 

for default judgment. See Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-72 (9th Cir. 1986) 
3 19-55571 

(setting forth standard of review and factors for determining whether to enter 

default judgment).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

All pending motions and requests are denied. 

AFFIRMED.
#### § 300.167 State advisory panel.

The State must establish and maintain an advisory panel for the purpose of providing policy guidance with respect to special education and related services for children with disabilities in the State.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0030)

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(21)(A))
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: April, 11, 2011 Meeting with Earth Justice on the 2011 NHSM Final Rule

FROM: Tab Tesnau Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329

On April 11, 2011, EPA met with members of Earth Justice and other part icipants to discuss their issues and concerns with the final ru le entitled, “Identification of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials That are Solid Waste,” wh ich was published in the Federal Register on March 21, 2011 (76 FR 15456). This is refe rred to as the 2011 NHSM Final Rule.

During that meeting, Representatives from Earth Ju stice and others expressed concerns with the materials that are not consider ed to be solid waste under the 2011 NHSM Final Rule. EPA asked clarifying questions regarding the information presented.

Expected Meeting Attendees Lisa Evans, Earthjustice Jim Pew, Earthjustice Vernice Miller Travis Abbie Dillen

Invited EPA Attendees: Mathy Stanislaus Bob Sussman John Michaud Laurel Celeste Lisa Feldt Lisa Garcia Matt Straus Suzanne Rudzinski
### Bedrock geology of the Tiverton quadrangle, Rhode Island-Massachusetts

By: Samuel Joseph Pollock

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1158D

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Bedrock geology of the Tiverton quadrangle, Rhode Island-Massachusetts(1956)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 89025 / June 5, 2020

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-18171

In the Matter of

JEREMY A. LICHT d/b/a 

JL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER DIRECTING 

DISBURSEMENT OF FAIR FUND

On August 22, 2019, the Commission published a Notice of Proposed Plan of 

Distribution and Opportunity for Comment (“Notice”),1pursuant to Rule 1103 of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans (“Commission’s Rules”).2 The 

Notice advised interested persons that they could obtain a copy of the Proposed Plan of 

Distribution (“Proposed Plan”) from the Commission’s public website or by submitting a written 

request to Noel Gittens, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, 

Washington, DC 20549-5876. The Notice also advised that all persons desiring to comment on 

the Proposed Plan could submit their comments, in writing, within 30 days of the Notice. The 

Commission received no comments on the Proposed Plan during the comment period. On 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 86733 (Aug. 22, 2019).

2

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1103.
2

October 10, 2019, the Commission issued an order approving the Proposed Plan,3and posted the 

approved Plan of Distribution (the “Plan”).

The Plan provides for the distribution of the Net Fair Fund4to eighty-seven (87) investors 

who were harmed by Licht’s “cherry-picking” scheme and whose Net Harm exceeds the de 

minimis amount of $10.00 as defined in the Plan. Since the Net Fair Fund ($278,289.34) exceeds 

the total Harm Amount incurred by the Eligible Investors ($95,636.09), Eligible Investors will 

receive a distribution equal to their full Net Harm amounts, plus reasonable interest (totaling 

$6,155.37). 

Pursuant to the Plan, the Fund Administrator has compiled the payee information and 

prepared the payment file in a Commission-approved format. The Commission staff has 

reviewed the payment file and requests that, pursuant to Rule 1101(b)(6) of the Commission’s 

Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans,5the Commission direct the payment of 

$101,791.46 from the Fair Fund to the escrow account at Alerus Financial, N.A. (“Alerus 

Financial”) for distribution to the Eligible Investors in accordance with the Plan.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Commission staff shall direct the payment 

of $101,791.46 from the Fair Fund to the escrow account at Alerus Financial for distribution to 

Eligible Investors in accordance with the Plan.

By the Commission.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary

 

3

 See Order Approving Plan of Distribution, Exchange Act Rel. No. 87283 (Oct. 10, 2019).

4

 All capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the same meanings ascribed to them in the Plan.

5

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(b)(6).
### §7301. Purpose

The purpose of this chapter is to encourage the collaborative, science-based ecosystem restoration of priority forest landscapes through a process that—

(1) encourages ecological, economic, and social sustainability;

(2) leverages local resources with national and private resources;

(3) facilitates the reduction of wildfire management costs, including through reestablishing natural fire regimes and reducing the risk of uncharacteristic wildfire; and

(4) demonstrates the degree to which—

(A) various ecological restoration techniques—

(i) achieve ecological and watershed health objectives; and

(ii) affect wildfire activity and management costs; and

(B) the use of forest restoration byproducts can offset treatment costs while benefitting local rural economies and improving forest health.

(Pub. L. 111–11, title IV, §4001, Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1141.)
### §742h. Reports on fishery products

(a) Repealed. Pub. L. 96–470, title I, §103(a), Oct. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 2237.

(b) The Secretary is authorized to make a report to the President and the Congress, and, when requested by the United States International Trade Commission in connection with section 1364 of title 19, or when an investigation is made under the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1332), the Secretary is authorized to make a report to such Commission, concerning the following matters with respect to any fishery product which is imported into the United States, or such reports may be made upon a request from any segment of the domestic industry producing a like or directly competitive product—

(1) whether there has been a downward trend in the production, employment in the production, or prices, or a decline in the sales, of the like or directly competitive product by the domestic industry; and

(2) whether there has been an increase in the imports of the fishery products into the United States, either actual or relative to the production of the like or directly competitive product produced by the domestic industry.

(Aug. 8, 1956, ch. 1036, §9, 70 Stat. 1123; Pub. L. 93–618, title I, §171(b), Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2009; Pub. L. 96–470, title I, §103(a), Oct. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 2237.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1364 of title 19, referred to in subsec. (b), was repealed by Pub. L. 87–794, title II, §257(e)(1), Oct. 11, 1962, 76 Stat. 882.

#### Amendments

1980—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 96–470 struck out subsec. (a) which required Secretary of the Interior to make an annual report to Congress with respect to activities of United States Fish and Wildlife Service under this Act, accompanied by appropriate legislative recommendations.

1975—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 93–618 substituted "United States International Trade Commission" for "United States Tariff Commission".

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Transfer of functions to Secretary of Commerce from Secretary of the Interior by Reorg. Plan No. 4 of 1970, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090, see note set out under section 742b of this title.