alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 214A/4 Ju

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 214A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 604 July 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 214A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 604 July 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2017/C 214 A/01 | Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AST/138/16 — Audio-visual and conference technicians (AST 3) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2017/C 214 A/01

Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AST/138/16 — Audio-visual and conference technicians (AST 3)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

V Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

| 4.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 214/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 214/1

---

RESERVE LIST (1)

Open competition EPSO/AST/138/16

Audio-visual and conference technicians (AST 3)

(2017/C 214 A/01)

| AVANZINI | Stephane |
| --- | --- |
| BALČIŪNAS | Aleksandras |
| CANDRIES | Steven |
| DE KERF | Jef |
| DROULEZ | Arnaud |
| DUCHATEAU | Cédric |
| FLORIDO SANTANA | Carlos Octavio |
| HANNES | Dave |
| KAMBOU | Wilfried |
| KARDAKARIS | Thomas |
| KNEZENAS | Vaidotas |
| LACHICA MUÑOZ | Carlos |
| MARTIN CARRION | Juan |
| MICHEL | Laurent |
| NOVELLO | Denis |
| NTIMOS | Konstantinos |
| ORIAM | Yasmine |
| PAPADOULAS | Konstantinos |
| REINA RUIZ | Jorge |
| RIFON | Joël |
| ROUSSEAU | Lionel |
| THEOCHARIS | Konstantinos |
| VAN DE VOORDE | Christophe |
| WITTMER | Rémy |

AVANZINI

Stephane

BALČIŪNAS

Aleksandras

CANDRIES

Steven

DE KERF

Jef

DROULEZ

Arnaud

DUCHATEAU

Cédric

FLORIDO SANTANA

Carlos Octavio

HANNES

Dave

KAMBOU

Wilfried

KARDAKARIS

Thomas

KNEZENAS

Vaidotas

LACHICA MUÑOZ

Carlos

MARTIN CARRION

Juan

MICHEL

Laurent

NOVELLO

Denis

NTIMOS

Konstantinos

ORIAM

Yasmine

PAPADOULAS

Konstantinos

REINA RUIZ

Jorge

RIFON

Joël

ROUSSEAU

Lionel

THEOCHARIS

Konstantinos

VAN DE VOORDE

Christophe

WITTMER

Rémy

The reserve lists will be valid until 30 June 2020.

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Mae Rose and John Michael, Defendants, Impleaded with Peter Fortuna, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction of the Court of Special Sessions affirmed. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

                     ROYAL ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. FORM 10-Q
                     FOR THE QUARTER ENDED FEBRUARY 29, 2008
      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Jacob Roth, certify that

    1.  I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Royal
        Energy Resources, Inc.
    2.  Attached to this certification is Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
        February 29, 2008, a periodic report (the "periodic report") filed by
        the issuer with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange
        Act"), which contains condensed financial statements.
    3.  I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
        o   The periodic report containing the condensed financial statements
            fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Exchange Act, and
        o   The information in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results
            of operations of the issuer for the periods presented.


April 9, 2008                                        /s/ Jacob Roth
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Jacob Roth
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
#### Charles Bracelin, Respondent, v. Mildred Bracelin, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. ■
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5THCIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-20882

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-93-CR-238-7)

February 9, 1999

Before POLITZ, BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Nancy G. Revelette, court-appointed counsel for Jose Hernandez, has filed

a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and moves

to be released from her court appointment. Considering the motion to be well

founded, same is granted and counsel is relieved of any further responsibilities

herein.

Hernandez has been granted ample time to respond to counsel’s motion or
2

to expand on the appellate brief and has opted not to do so. Accordingly, having

considered the briefs and pertinent parts of the record, and finding no non-frivolous

issue, the appeal is DISMISSED.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00138-CR

NO. 03-12-00139-CR

NO. 03-12-00140-CR

NO. 03-12-00141-CR

Zane Thomas, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOS. 14,407, 14,595, 14,596, 14,655

HONORABLE REVA TOWSLEE CORBETT, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The trial court convicted appellant Zane Thomas of possession of a controlled

substance weighing less than one gram, see Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115(b) (West

2010); two counts of burglary of a habitation, see Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 30.02 (West 2011);

and theft of a firearm, see id. § 31.03(e)(4) (West 2011). The trial court sentenced appellant to

fifteen years’ incarceration for the two burglary convictions and two years’ confinement in a state

jail facility for both the controlled-substance and theft-of-a-firearm convictions, with sentences to

run concurrently.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a

brief concluding that the appeals are frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements
of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why

there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967);

Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,

86–87 (1988).

Appellant received a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his right to examine

the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at

766. We have not received a pro se brief from the appellant.

We have conducted an independent review of the record, including appellate

counsel’s brief, and find no reversible error. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766;

Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the

record presents no arguably meritorious grounds for review and the appeals are frivolous.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The judgments of conviction are affirmed.

___________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Goodwin and Field

Affirmed

Filed: March 21, 2013

Do Not Publish

2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 96664 / January 13, 2023

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20453

In the Matter of

Blockchain Credit Partners d/b/a 

DeFi Money Market, Gregory 

Keough, and Derek Acree,

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

On May 4, 2022, the Commission issued an Omnibus Order Directing the Engagement of 

Two Tax Administrators for Appointment on a Case-By-Case Basis in Administrative 

Proceedings that Establish Distribution Funds (the “Omnibus Order”).1 The Omnibus Order 

engaged Miller Kaplan Arase LLP and Heffler, Radetich & Saitta, LLP to serve as the 

Commission’s tax administrator (“Tax Administrator”), for selection and appointment on an 

individual case basis, for calendar years 2022 through 2024 in administrative proceedings where 

the distribution fund may incur tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) 

under the Department of the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

The Director of the Division of Enforcement is authorized to appoint a Tax Administrator 

pursuant to the Omnibus Order.2 The Commission staff has requested the appointment of Miller 

Kaplan Arase LLP as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the Omnibus Order, Miller Kaplan Arase 

LLP is appointed as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.3

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 94845 (May 4, 2022).

2

 See Delegation of Authority to Director of the Division of Enforcement, Securities Act Rel. No. 10900 (Dec. 10,

2020).

3

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(ii).
### §831v. Legislation to carry out purposes of chapter; recommendation by President

The President shall, from time to time, as the work provided for in section 831u of this title progresses, recommend to Congress such legislation as he deems proper to carry out the general purposes stated in said section, and for the especial purpose of bringing about in said Tennessee drainage basin and adjoining territory in conformity with said general purposes (1) the maximum amount of flood control; (2) the maximum development of said Tennessee River for navigation purposes; (3) the maximum generation of electric power consistent with flood control and navigation; (4) the proper use of marginal lands; (5) the proper method of reforestation of all lands in said drainage basin suitable for reforestation; and (6) the economic and social well-being of the people living in said river basin.

(May 18, 1933, ch. 32, §23, 48 Stat. 69.)
Order entered June 28, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-01007-CR

QUINTUS JEROME RICHARDSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F19-13785-N

ORDER

In light of the Court’s June 24, 2021 opinion, we will take no action on any 

pending motions, including appointed counsel Valencia Bush’s motion to 

withdraw or appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file his pro se response.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 90187 / October 15, 2020

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-19334

In the Matter of

MVP Manager LLC,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

By order dated February 22, 2019, the Commission issued the “Omnibus Order 

Directing the Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that 

Establish Distribution Funds” (“Omnibus Order”),1authorizing the Secretary to issue 

orders for calendar years 2019-2021 appointing, upon request by the Commission staff, 

Miller Kaplan Arase LLP (“Miller Kaplan”), a certified public accounting firm, with one 

of their offices located in San Fransciso, California, as tax administrator (“Tax 

Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund may incur 

tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department of 

the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On October 13, 2020, the Commission staff requested, pursuant to the 

Omnibus Order, the appointment of Miller Kaplan as the Tax Administrator for the 

QSF in the above-referenced proceeding. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Miller Kaplan, pursuant to and in accordance 

with the Omnibus Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the abovereferenced proceeding. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 85174 (Feb. 22, 2019).
ACCEPTED

06-15-00153-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

9/17/2015 2:12:36 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 9/17/2015 2:12:36 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
April 1, 2015 

Mr. Paul A DeCarlo 

RE/MAX Southern Homes 

PO Box 361614 

Birmingham, AL 35236 

Dear Mr. DeCarlo: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Cannot Process Your Request 

We entered your February 4, 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

0303), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9521. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Jake Troutman 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Private  Access,  Inc., on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2001 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned,  B.
Stephen Bailey,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Official Journal L 64/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 64 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5910 March 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 64

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5910 March 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/322 of 10 February 2016 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions of the liquidity coverage requirement (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/322 of 10 February 2016 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions of the liquidity coverage requirement (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
### §825o. Penalties for violations; applicability of section

#### (a) Statutory violations

Any person who willfully and knowingly does or causes or suffers to be done any act, matter, or thing in this chapter prohibited or declared to be unlawful, or who willfully and knowingly omits or fails to do any act, matter, or thing in this chapter required to be done, or willfully and knowingly causes or suffers such omission or failure, shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by a fine of not more than $1,000,000 or by imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both.

#### (b) Rules violations

Any person who willfully and knowingly violates any rule, regulation, restriction, condition, or order made or imposed by the Commission under authority of this chapter, or any rule or regulation imposed by the Secretary of the Army under authority of subchapter I of this chapter shall, in addition to any other penalties provided by law, be punished upon conviction thereof by a fine of not exceeding $25,000 for each and every day during which such offense occurs.

(June 10, 1920, ch. 285, pt. III, §316, as added Aug. 26, 1935, ch. 687, title II, §213, 49 Stat. 862; amended July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501; Pub. L. 102–486, title VII, §725(a), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2920; Pub. L. 109–58, title XII, §1284(d), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 980.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2005—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–58, §1284(d)(1), substituted "$1,000,000" for "$5,000" and "5 years" for "two years".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 109–58, §1284(d)(2), substituted "$25,000" for "$500".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 109–58, §1284(d)(3), struck out subsec. (c) which read as follows: "This subsection shall not apply in the case of any provision of section 824j, 824k, 824l, or 824m of this title or any rule or order issued under any such provision."

1992—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 102–486 added subsec. (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued military Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.

#### State Authorities; Construction

Nothing in amendment by Pub. L. 102–486 to be construed as affecting or intending to affect, or in any way to interfere with, authority of any State or local government relating to environmental protection or siting of facilities, see section 731 of Pub. L. 102–486, set out as a note under section 796 of this title.
EXHIBIT 10.7
   phelps
   dodge
Corporation of Canada, Limited


17 December, 1999

Thornton Donaldson, President
Uranium Power Corporation
Suite 206 - 475 Howe Street
Vancouver, BC V6C 2B3

Dear: Thornton

       Re: Athabasca Basin Work Commitment

We refer to the Exploration Option and Operating Joint Venture Agreement made as
of December  16, 1998 (the  "Agreement")  between  Phelps Dodge  Corporation  of
Canada,  Limited ("PDC"), as Optionor, and Uranium Power Corporation ("UPC"), as
Optionee,  regarding  the  Athabasca  Basin,  Saskatchewan  properties,  and  in
particular,  to Section 4.1(c) thereof. We also refer to your letter of November
19, 1999. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used in this letter
have the meanings given to them in the Agreement.

Section 4.1(c) of the Agreement describes the Option.  In order to
maintain  the Option,  the  Optionee is required,  among other  things,  to have
completed  by  December  31,  1999  the  Initial  Program  and to have  incurred
Expenditures  of $500,000.  PDC hereby agrees to amend section  4.1(c) to delete
"December 31, 1999" and replace it with "May 31, 2000"  provided that UPC spends
the  balance  of the  $500,000  in the amount of  $120,000  on any of the claims
listed on  Schedule A - Part 1 of the  Agreement  other  than the four  Crawford
claims listed therein.

If you are in agreement with the contents of this letter, please sign and return
the  enclosed  duplicate  copy of this  letter to the  writer  at your  earliest
convenience.

Yours truly,

/s/G.R. Cooke
------------------------------------------------
G. R. Cooke, District Geologist Central District

PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION OF CANADA, LIMITED

Accepted and agreed, this 20th day of December, 1999

/s/Thornton J. Donaldson
------------------------------------------------
Uranium Power Corporation, Thornton J. Donaldson

                Suite 223-530 Century St., Winnipeg, Mb., R3H OY4
                     Phone: 204-772-0773 & Fax: 204-774-3304