alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LISA MELISSE, as personal representative of the Estate of GLORIA BONO, deceased, and MICHAEL BONO, SR., as personal representative

of the Estate of MICHAEL BONO JR., deceased

, Appellant s ,

v.

Y.C.C.S. PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida corporation, JUDITH L. MATTHEWS and GULICK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., a Florida corporation for profit

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 17

- 950

[ May 3, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Jud icial Circuit, Martin County ; Barbara W. Bronis , Judge; L.T. Case No. 2016CA000739

.

Jay M. Levy of Jay M. Levy, P.A., Miami, and John Leighton of Leighton Law, P.A., Miami, for appellant s

.

Scott A. Cole of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Miami, and David Br adley and Adam Zhamukhanov of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., West Palm Beach,

for appellee, Y.C.C.S. Property Owners Association, Inc.

Benjamin L. Bedard and Dana P. Clement of Roberts, Reynolds, Bedard & Tuzzio, PLLC, West Palm Beach, for appellee, Judith L. Matthews.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY
, C IKLIN and K UNTZ
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### §§ 208.26-208.29 [Reserved]
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. Section 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Q Comm International, Inc. (the
        "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
        Mark W. Robinson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to
        18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will
        be
        retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
        request.
 
 /s/
        Mark W.
        Robinson
 
 Mark
        W.
        Robinson
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 (Principal
        Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
 August
        10, 2005
### §8f. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, acts June 3, 1948, ch. 401, §2, 62 Stat. 334; Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 852, §5, 70 Stat. 908, defined the word "State" as used in former section 8e of this title. See section 101512(a) of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 456 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 456

   Recognizing and celebrating the 200th anniversary of the entry of 
                Alabama into the Union as the 22d State.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 17, 2019

    Mr. Shelby (for himself and Mr. Jones) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing and celebrating the 200th anniversary of the entry of 
                Alabama into the Union as the 22d State.

Whereas Congress created the Alabama Territory from the eastern half of the 
        Mississippi Territory on March 3, 1817;
Whereas by 1819, the birth and growth of cities, towns, and communities in the 
        Alabama Territory ensured that the population of the Alabama Territory 
        had developed sufficiently to achieve the minimum number of inhabitants 
        required by Congress to qualify for statehood;
Whereas Congress and President James Monroe approved statehood for the Alabama 
        Territory on December 14, 1819, making Alabama the 22d State of the 
        United States;
Whereas December 14, 2019, marks the 200th anniversary of the attainment of 
        statehood by Alabama; and
Whereas that bicentennial is a monumental occasion to celebrate and commemorate 
        the achievements of the great State of Alabama: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate recognizes and celebrates the 200th 
anniversary of the entry of Alabama into the Union as the 22d State.
                                 <all>
```
### §539l–5. Wilderness potential

#### (a) In general

Nothing in this Act shall preclude or restrict the authority of the Secretary to evaluate the suitability of lands in the Protection Area for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System or to make recommendations to Congress for such inclusion.

#### (b) Evaluation of certain lands

In connection with the first revision of the land and resources management plan for the Arapaho/Roosevelt National Forest after August 21, 2002, the Secretary shall evaluate the suitability of the lands managed under the management prescription referred to in section 539l(d)(1)(F) of this title for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System and make recommendations to Congress regarding such inclusion.

(Pub. L. 107–216, §8, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1061.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 107–216, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1055, which is classified principally to sections 539l to 539l–5 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 539l of this title and Tables.
### §554. Forest supervisors and rangers

Forest supervisors and rangers shall be selected, when practicable, from qualified citizens of the States or Territories in which the national forests, respectively, are situated.

(Feb. 1, 1905, ch. 288, §3, 33 Stat. 628.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

"National forests" substituted in text for "reserves" on authority of act Mar. 4, 1907, ch. 2907, 34 Stat. 1269, which provided that forest reserves shall hereafter be known as national forests.
§ 222.36 How many federally connected children must a local educational agency have to receive a payment under section 8003? ( a ) An LEA is eligible to receive a payment under section 8003 for a fiscal year only if the total number of eligible federally connected children for whom it provided a free public education for the preceding fiscal year was— ( 1 ) At least 400 who were in average daily attendance (ADA); or
( 2 ) At least 3 percent of the total number of children in ADA.
( b ) An LEA is eligible to receive a payment under section 8003 for a fiscal year on behalf of federally connected children described in section 8003(a)(1)(F) or (G) only if the total number of those children for whom it provided a free public education for the preceding fiscal year was— ( 1 ) At least 1,000 in ADA; or
( 2 ) At least 10 percent of the total number of children in ADA.
( c ) Children described in paragraph (b) of this section are counted for the purposes of paragraph (a) of this section only if the applicant LEA is eligible to receive a payment on behalf of those children under section 8003.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7703(a)(3) and (b)(1)(B))
[60 FR 50778, Sept. 29, 1995, as amended at 62 FR 35415, July 1, 1997; 80 FR 33163, June 11, 2015]
#### In the Matter of James Rivers, Appellant, v New York State Board of Parole, Respondent.

[822 NYS2d 922]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Sackett, J.), entered March 29, 2006 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition.

Petitioner’s request for parole release was denied in October 2004 and he was ordered held for an additional 24 months. The determination was affirmed on administrative appeal and petitioner received notice of such determination on July 11, 2005. Thereafter, he unsuccessfully attempted to commence a CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination in Supreme Court, Bronx County. After the papers were returned to him, he commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding by filing the petition and an unexecuted order to show cause in Supreme Court, Albany County, on December 6, 2005. Respondent moved to dismiss the petition as barred by the four-month statute of limitations. Supreme Court granted the motion and this appeal ensued.

Since the determination giving rise to this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner has reappeared before respondent and his request for parole release was denied. Given petitioner’s subsequent reappearance, the instant matter is now moot and must be dismissed *(see Matter of Rivera v Travis,*8 AD3d 716, 716-717 [2004]).

Cardona, BJ., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 14, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 14, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22D0032. SHARON DANIELLE EGNOSKI v. JOSHUA CHRISTOPHER EGNOSKI.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

19MV00184
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 97632 / June 1, 2023

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-21181

In the Matter of

Barclays PLC and Barclays Bank 

PLC,

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

EXTENSION ORDER

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested an extension of time until 

November 30, 2023 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution under Rule 1101(a) of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(a).

On September 29, 2022, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist 

Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21C of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order (the 

“Order”)1against Barclays PLC (“BPLC”) and Barclays Bank PLC (“BBPLC”) (collectively, the 

“Respondents”). In the Order, the Commission found that BBPLC failed to put into place any 

internal control around the real-time tracking of securities being offered or sold off of its 

Commission-registered shelf registration statements. As a result of this failure, between June 26, 

2019 and March 9, 2022, BBPLC offered and sold an unprecedented amount of securities—

cumulatively totaling approximately $17.7 billion—in excess of what it had registered with the 

 

1

 Securities Act Rel. No. 11110 (Sept. 29, 2022).
2

Commission, in violation of Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act. In connection with the 

over-issuances and internal control failure, BPLC and BBPLC restated their year-end 2021 

audited financial statements filed with the Commission.

The Commission ordered the Respondents to pay a $200,000,000 civil penalty to the 

Commission. The Commission ordered the funds paid pursuant to the Order be held in an 

account at the United States Treasury.

On March 30, 2023, the Commission issued an order2that created a Fair Fund, pursuant 

to Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, so the penalty paid can be distributed to 

harmed investors (the “Fair Fund”).

The Fair Fund consists of the $200,000,000 paid by the Respondents, and has been 

deposited in a Commission-designated account at the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Any 

accrued interest will be added to the Fair Fund.

In its request for an extension of time, the Division states that additional time is needed to 

engage a third-party to assist with some of the administrative tasks of implementing the 

distribution, develop the distribution methodology, and prepare the proposed plan of distribution.

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s 

request for an extension of time until November 30, 2023 to submit a Proposed Plan of 

Distribution is granted. 

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.3

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

2

 Order Establishing a Fair Fund, Exchange Act Rel. No. 97221 (Mar. 30, 2023).

3

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(i).
EX-10.81 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR LOAN AGREEMENT



 





Exhibit 10.81




Supplemental Agreement For Loan Agreement



This Supplement Agreement For Loan Agreement (this “Supplemental Agreement”) is entered into
as of March 20, 2006 by and among the following Parties:





	(1)	 	New Allyes Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (“Lender”)

Address: Room E-G, Floor 28 Zhaofeng Shimao Tower, 369 Jiangsu Road, Shanghai;
	 
	(2)	 	Hailong Zhu (“Borrower”)

ID card No.: 110108680408041

Address: Room 2504, Building 4, Yuanjing Garden, Lane 1 Xujiahui Road, Shanghai;





Whereas:



The Lender and the Borrower signed a Loan Agreement (“Original Loan Agreement”) in amount of RMB
500,000 as of April 20, 2005, this loan was used as the registered capital of Shanghai Quanshi
Advertisement Co., Ltd. (“SH Quanshi”) in Shanghai for the Borrower.



Now because of the requirement of Shanghai Quanshi’s business operation, the registered capital of
Shanghai Quanshi shall be increased by the consent of the Lender. The Lender and the Borrower
through mutual negotiations hereby for the increased registered capital enter into this
Supplemental Agreement as below:





	1.	 	According to the provisions and terms of the Original Loan Agreement, the Lender agrees to
provide another loan without interest in amount of RMB 2,000,000 to the Borrower for
increasing the registered capital of SH Quanshi. The term of this loan is from March 20, 2006
to March 19, 2016 with the validity time of 10 years and shall be renewed by the consent of
both parties.
	 
	2.	 	Other terms of the Original Loan Agreement keep effective.
	 
	3.	 	This Supplemental Agreement takes effect as of the date of execution. This Supplemental
Agreement shall be prepared in 2 original copies, with each involved party holding 1 copy
hereof. Any amendments or supplements to this Supplemental Agreement shall be made in writing
and shall take effect only when properly signed by the Parties to this Supplemental Agreement.





[the remainder of this page is left blank]




1









 





Execution Page





			
	Lender:	 	New Allyes Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (Corporate Seal)





/s/ Jiangang Wang

Position: Authorized Representative




Borrower: Hailong Zhu




/s/ Hailong Zhu





2
§ 303.101 State eligibility—requirements for a grant under this part. In order to be eligible for a grant under part C of the Act for any fiscal year, a State must meet the following conditions: ( a ) *Assurances regarding early intervention services and a statewide system.* The State must provide assurances to the Secretary that— ( 1 ) The State has adopted a policy that appropriate early intervention services, as defined in § 303.13, are available to all infants and toddlers with disabilities in the State and their families, including— ( i ) Indian infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families residing on a reservation geographically located in the State;
( ii ) Infants and toddlers with disabilities who are homeless children and their families; and
( iii ) Infants and toddlers with disabilities who are wards of the State; and
( 2 ) The State has in effect a statewide system of early intervention services that meets the requirements of section 635 of the Act, including policies and procedures that address, at a minimum, the components required in §§ 303.111 through 303.126.
( b ) *State application and assurances.* The State must provide information and assurances to the Secretary, in accordance with subpart C of this part, including— ( 1 ) Information that shows that the State meets the State application requirements in §§ 303.200 through 303.212; and
( 2 ) Assurances that the State also meets the requirements in §§ 303.221 through 303.227.
( c ) *Approval before implementation.* The State must obtain approval by the Secretary before implementing any policy or procedure required to be submitted as part of the State's application in §§ 303.203, 303.204, 303.206, 303.207, 303.208, 303.209, and 303.211.
(Approved by Office of Management and Budget under control number 1820-0550) (Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1434, 1435, 1437)
# Forms List

This page provides links to PDF versions of SEC public forms and many of the rules, regulations, and schedules associated with these forms. To find a form, either select the appropriate category below or scroll through the full list of SEC forms in alphanumeric order. Please note that you will need Adobe Reader plug-in to view these forms (available for free from Adobe through our About Adobe Acrobat (PDF) page).

- Certified shareholder report of registered management investment companies 
- Current Report, Money Market Fund Material Events 
- Report of sales pursuant to Rule 609 of Regulation E 
- Certificate of accounting of securities and similar investments of a management investment company in the custody of members of national securities exchanges 
- Monthly Schedule of Portfolio Holdings of Money Market Funds 
- Registration under 1933 act of securities of unit investment trusts registered on form N-8B-2 
- Registration statement of unit investment trusts which are currently issuing securities 
- Notification of withdrawal of election to be subject to Sections 55-65 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 
- Certificate of accounting of securities and similar investments in the custody of management investment companies 
- Notice of withdrawal from registration as transfer agent 
- Registration statement for closed-end management investment companies 
- Registration form for open-end management investment companies 
- Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) 
- Registration statement / Annual report / Transition report 
- Current report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) 
- General form for quarterly reports under Section 13 or 15(d) 
- Notification of late filing 
- General form for registration of securities pursuant to Section 12(b) or (g) 
- Monthly Portfolio Investments Report 
- Information required of a self-regulatory organization listing and trading a new derivative securities product pursuant to Rule 19b-4(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
- (Financial and Operational Combined Uniform Single) FOCUS Report: Information Required of All Brokers and Dealers Pursuant to Rule 17a-5 
- Reporting Form for Investment Advisers to Private Funds and Certain Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading Advisors 
- Uniform request for broker-dealer withdrawal 
- Form for the registration of securities issued in business combination transactions by investment companies and business development companies 
- Information required of institutional investment managers pursuant to Section 13(f)
BLED IN COURT 0- APPEALS

12th C<xn ofAppeasDsnct

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-0228-14

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TERENCE JOHNSON, Appellee

ON STATE'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON COUNTY

Meyers, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

DISSENTING OPINION

I disagree that the destruction-of-a-flag statute is unconstitutionally overbroad.

The statute is actually quite specific: "A person commits an offense if the person

intentionally or knowingly damages, defaces, mutilates, or burns the flag of the United

States or the State of Texas." TEX. PENAL CODE§42.11. It serves to keep people from

destroying a symbol of our nation and state, which is exactly what Appellee did here. By
Johnson dissent-Page 2

all accounts, he was not attempting to make any type ofstatement, so his conduct is not

protected under the First Amendment. Although it is the flag's symbolism that provides it

specialized protection under this statute, its use as a symbol of expression is exempted

from prosecution and thus the limited enforcement of the statute will not produce a

chilling effect on protected conduct. The State could just as easily promulgate a statute

prohibiting the killing of a mockingbird, which as the State bird of Texas also has great

symbolism, without infringing on the freedom of expression.

Because it is overkill to declare this statute unconstitutional when the real question

is merely whether the State had sufficient evidence to convict Appellee of destruction of a

flag, I respectfully dissent.

Filed: October 7, 2015

Publish
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Q Comm International, Inc.
        (the " Company ")
        on
        Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission (" SEC ")
        on the
        date hereof (the " Report "),
        I,
        Michael D. Keough, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to
        18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will
        be
        retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
        request.
 
 
 /s/
        Michael D.
        Keough
 Michael
        D. Keough
 Chief
        Executive Officer and President
 
 August
        14, 2006
388 P.2d 398

#### In the Matter of David G. HOUSMAN, Attorney at Law.

No. 7527.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Jan. 29, 1964.

COMPTON, Chief Justice, and CARMODY, CHAVEZ, NOBLE and MOISE, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that the Report of Referees filed herein be and the same is hereby adopted in its entirety.

Further ordered that the Respondent, David G. Housman, be and he is hereby in .open Court censured and reprimanded for such unethical and unprofessional conduct in the practice of law.
§ 270.5 What geographic regions do the EACs serve? ( a ) The Secretary awards a grant to provide race, sex, national origin, and religion desegregation assistance under this program to regional EACs serving designated geographic regions.
( b ) The Secretary announces in the Federal Register the number of centers and geographic regions for each competition.
( c ) The Secretary determines the number and boundaries of each geographic region for each competition on the basis of one or more of the following: ( 1 ) Size and diversity of the student population;
( 2 ) The number of LEAs;
( 3 ) The composition of urban, city, and rural LEAs;
( 4 ) The history and frequency of the EAC and other Department technical assistance activities;
( 5 ) Geographic proximity of the States within each region; and
( 6 ) The amount of funding available for the competition.