alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §79e. Exchange of property; cash equalization payments; commercial operations, minimum economic dislocation and disruption

In exercising his authority to acquire property by exchange, the Secretary may accept title to any non-Federal property within the boundaries of the park, and outside of such boundaries within the limits prescribed in this subchapter. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary may acquire such property from the grantor by exchange for any federally owned property under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management in California, except property needed for public use and management, which he classifies as suitable for exchange or other disposal, or any federally owned property he may designate within the Northern Redwood Purchase Unit in Del Norte County, California, except that section known and designated as the Yurok Experimental Forest, consisting of approximately nine hundred and thirty-five acres. Such federally owned property shall also be available for use by the Secretary in lieu of, or together with, cash in payment of just compensation for any real property taken pursuant to section 79c(b) of this title. The values of the properties so exchanged either shall be approximately equal or, if they are not approximately equal, the value shall be equalized by the payment of cash to the grantor or to the Secretary as the circumstances require. Through the exercise of his exchange authority, the Secretary shall, to the extent possible, minimize economic dislocation and the disruption of the grantor's commercial operations.

(Pub. L. 90–545, §5, Oct. 2, 1968, 82 Stat. 933.)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DWAYNE WRIGHT,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 562 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of April, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**613**

**CA 13**

**- 01771** 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN WAGNER,

DECEASED.

-------------------------------------------- CANANDAIGUA NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY,

PETITIONER

- RESPONDENT;

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SALLY BAUMANN, OBJECTANT

- RESPONDENT;

COLIN DESROSIERS AND MICHELLE DESROSIERS,

OBJECTANTS

- APPELLANTS. (APPEA L NO. 1.)

LACY KATZEN LLP, ROCHESTER (RACHELLE H. NUHFER OF COUNSEL), FOR

OBJECTANTS

- APPELLANTS.

LAW OFFICE OF HEIDI W. FEINBERG, ROCHESTER (HEIDI W. FEINBERG OF COUNSEL),

FOR PETITIONER

- RESPONDENT.

WOO DS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (RENÉ H. REIXACH OF COUNSEL), FOR

OBJECTANT

- RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Surrogate = s Court, Monroe County (Edmund A. Calvaruso, S.), entered July 18, 2013. The order, among other things, terminated a testamentary trust.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed.

Same Memorandum as in Matter of Wagner ([appeal N o. 2] ___ AD3d ___ [Aug. 8, 2014]).

Entered: August 8, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
1_ j u-.,iGIN,. ., 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 24-0038 

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: 

BOBBY FRANCIS LOWRY V, 

Petitioner and Appellant, 

and 

LYN DENISE WELCH HARMON, 

Respondent and Appellee. 

FILL-77) 

MAR - 5 2024 

Bowen 

Clerk Greenwoo of Suprerne

State of Montan:urt 

ORDER 

Before this Court is self-represented Appellant Bobby Francis Lowry V's "Motion 

for Copy of District Court Record/Motion for Extension" of time to file his opening brief. 

Lowry requests that this Court provide him a copy of the record from the Lewis and Clark 

County District Court, where he initiated this civil proceeding. Lowry provides that he 

needs an additional thirty days. 

We observe that, while he may proceed on appeal without paying the filing fee, 

Lowry is not entitled to a copy of the record without payment. Sections 25-10-404 and 

25-1-201(1)(d), MCA. Upon review of the court record on file here, only seven documents 

comprise the record. Though Lowry's Notice of Appeal indicates that he is appealing a 

January 5, 2024 final judgment or order of the District Court, the record contains no such 

order. 

Lowry initiated the underlYing case in February 2022 when he filed a petition for 

dissolution without children, proposed property distribution, and motion to proceed 

without paying the filing fees. The court granted his motion. Lowry sent a letter to the 

court in July 2022, and then requested this Court to take supervisory control regarding the 

dissolution matter and other civil cases he had filed. Lowry v. First Judicial Dist. Ct., No. 

OP 22-0617, Order dismissing writ of supervisory control (Mont. Nov. 15, 2022). We 

03/05/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0038
dismissed his petition, stating that "Lowry has presented no information or documents that 

he actually served the parties with the copies of the construction liens or complaints." 

Order, at 2. The record on appeal here reveals that Lowry never served the opposing party 

with his February 2022 filings. There is a December 7, 2022 e-mail to the Clerk of District 

Court from a Lewis and Clark County Detention Officer, attaching a list of questions from 

Lowry, including a question about service of process. The record does not reflect whether 

the clerk responded, but there is no indication that service was accomplished. There is 

consequently no action the District Court has taken or may take on his pleadings, and there 

is no order or final judgment from which Lowry may appeal. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and 

this matter is CLOSED as of this Order's date. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Lowry's Motion for Copy of District Court 

Record/Motion for Extension of Time is DENIED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to all parties at their last known 

addresses. 

`7-1,-, 

DATED this S - day of March, 2024. 

," '-Chief Justice 

,-)-ec/2- r-i i-- / 

_4,„hacf 

2
#### § 233.1 Contracts.

The contracts with transportation lines referred to in section 233(c) of the Act may be entered into by the Executive Associate Commissioner for Programs, or by an immigration officer designated by the Executive Associate Commissioner for Programs on behalf of the government and shall be documented on Form I-420. The contracts with transportation lines referred to in section 233(a) of the Act shall be made by the Commissioner on behalf of the government and shall be documented on Form I-426. The contracts with transportation lines desiring their passengers to be preinspected at places outside the United States shall be made by the Commissioner on behalf of the government and shall be documented on Form I-425; except that contracts for irregularly operated charter flights may be entered into by the Associate Commissioner for Examinations or an immigration officer designated by the Executive Associate Commissioner for Programs and having jurisdiction over the location where the inspection will take place.

[62 FR 10353, Mar. 6, 1997]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET, INCOME STATEMENT AND CASH FLOW STATEMENT OF ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE BALANCE SHEET, INCOME STATEMENT
AND CASH FLOW STATEMENT OF ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        1,765
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                         13
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             441
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         3,079
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,298
<COMMON>                                           940
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                 55
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   1,035
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              193
<PREFERRED>                                         46
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             1,906
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                  25
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                     302
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      236
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   1,555
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    5,298
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        1,903
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                64
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       1,631
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       1,605
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            218
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  39
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     257
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           144
<NET-INCOME>                                       113
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         17
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                       96
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                            41
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                          120
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             150
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      Exhibit 23



                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY:

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Houston Lighting &
Power Company's (i) Registration Statement on Form S-4 No. 333-11329, (ii)
Registration Statements on Form S-3 Nos. 33-46368, 33-54228, 333-20069,
333-20069-01, 333-20069-02, 333-20069-03, 333-20069-04 and (iii) Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-51417 on Form S-3 of our
report dated February 21, 1997, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Houston Lighting & Power Company for the year ended December 31, 1996.




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

HOUSTON, TEXAS
MARCH 20, 1997
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Vincent J. Lombardo, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Ablest Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period
ended December 28, 2003 (the Report), which this certification
accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.                                                                                        

| |                                         
| | ----------------------------------------
| | /s/ Vincent J. Lombardo                 
| |                                         
| | Vincent J. Lombardo                     
| | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
| | and Secretary                           

February 17, 2004
**Avis juridique important**

*|*

# 52003XC0711(04)

**Publication of a request under Article 9 of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 to amend one or more parts of the specification of a name registered under Article 17 or Article 6 of that Regulation***Official Journal C 162 , 11/07/2003 P. 0008 - 0009*

Publication of a request under Article 9 of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 to amend one or more parts of the specification of a name registered under Article 17 or Article 6 of that Regulation

(2003/C 162/05)

Publication confers the right to object within the meaning of Article 7 and 12d of the Regulation. Any objections to this request must be forwarded via the competent authority of a Member State, a WTO Member country or a third country recognised under Article 12(3) within six months of the publication date.

The amendment is not a minor one and it must therefore be published under Article 6(2) of the Regulation.

COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 2081/92

APPLICATION TO AMEND A SPECIFICATION: ARTICLE 9

1. Registered name: "Siurana"

2. Responsible department in the Member State: Name: Subdirección General de Denominaciones de Calidad y Relaciones Interprofesionales y Contractuales

Dirección General de Alimentación

Subsecretaría de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación del Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación

Address: Paseo Infanta Isabel, 1 - E-28071 Madrid

Telephone: (34) 913 47 53 94

Fax: (34) 913 47 54 10.

3. Amendment(s) requested: - specification heading:

[square  ] name

[square  ] description

>PIC FILE= "C_2003162EN.000802.TIF">

geographical area

[square  ] proof of origin

[square  ] method of production

[square  ] link

[square  ] labelling

[square  ] national requirements

- amendment(s):

The geographical area covered by this designation is to be extended to include the following municipalities:

>TABLE>

From the point of view of the link with the environment (historical, soil, relief, and climatic factors), the geographical area to be extended continues to demonstrate a cohesion and degree of homogeneity similar to what it had prior to the requested extension (initial PDO) and fulfils all the basic requirements set out in the specification for this protected designation of origin listed in the Community register, producing an extra virgin olive oil with the same characteristics as the protected olive oil.

4. Date of receipt of the full application: 5.2.2003.
1

December 08, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Exemption #11305, Docket ID FAA-2014-1017

Dear Sir or Madam:

Flying Cross Aerial Productions was issued Exemption #11305 for the purpose of 

operating UAS for filming and photography. We are requesting that in addition to the 

aircraft listed in the Exemption, two additional make and model aircraft be included. 

These additional aircraft have similar flight and operating characteristics as the originally 

exempted models, and shall be operated under the same terms and conditions contained 

in the Exemption. We therefore believe good cause exists not to publish this amendment 

request in the Federal Register.

The additional aircraft are: Hexacrafter HX-1000 (hexacopter) and DJI Inspire One 

(quadcopter).

Amendments to Flying Cross Aerial Production’s Operations Manual(s) are being 

submitted as confidential information, electronically by email.

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

Scott Hess, Owner

Flying Cross Aerial Productions

P.O. Box 26203

Austin, TX 78755
Case 17-13497-BFK Doc 388 Filed 03/21/19 Entered 03/22/19 08:15:11 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 6
Case 17-13497-BFK Doc 388 Filed 03/21/19 Entered 03/22/19 08:15:11 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 6
Case 17-13497-BFK Doc 388 Filed 03/21/19 Entered 03/22/19 08:15:11 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 6
Case 17-13497-BFK Doc 388 Filed 03/21/19 Entered 03/22/19 08:15:11 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 6
Case 17-13497-BFK Doc 388 Filed 03/21/19 Entered 03/22/19 08:15:11 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 6
Case 17-13497-BFK Doc 388 Filed 03/21/19 Entered 03/22/19 08:15:11 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 6
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4950 

To direct the Secretary of Education to conduct a study on Federal data 

collection related to student participation and performance in career 

and technical education programs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 31, 2019 

Mr. BUDD (for himself and Mr. BISHOP of North Carolina) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Education to conduct a study 

on Federal data collection related to student participation and performance in career and technical education 

programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘CTE Outcome Data 

5 Enactment Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘CODE Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STUDY ON DATA COLLECTION. 

7 (a) STUDY REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Education 

8 (in this section referred to as the ‘‘Secretary’’), in conVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:12 Nov 08, 2019 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4950.IH H4950

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4950 IH

1 sultation with the Secretary of Labor, shall conduct a 

2 study on Federal data collection related to student partici3 pation and performance in career and technical education 

4 programs. Such study shall— 

5 (1) assess the effectiveness of Federal efforts to 

6 collect, measure, and evaluate data relating to stu7 dent participation and performance in, and comple8 tion of, career and technical education programs; 

9 and 

10 (2) identify— 

11 (A) gaps and areas of duplication with re12 spect to such efforts; and 

13 (B) methods to improve and centralize 

14 such efforts. 

15 (b) TASK FORCE.—In conducting the study required 

16 under subsection (a), the Secretary may convene a task 

17 force consisting of such members as the Secretary con18 siders appropriate. 

19 (c) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date 

20 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit 

21 to Congress a report containing the findings of the study 

22 required under subsection (a) and any recommendations 

23 of the Secretary related to such findings. 

24 (d) DEFINITION.—The term ‘‘career and technical 

25 education’’ has the meaning given the term in section 3 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4950 IH

1 of the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education 

2 Act of 2006 (20 U.S.C. 2302). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.2**     DAC TECHNOLOGIES GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) ORRULE 15d-14(c) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of DAC Technologies Group InternationalInc (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Robert C. Goodwin, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.                                /s/ Robert C. Goodwin   Robert C. Goodwin, CFO, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer      Date: August 14, 2006
#### In the Matter of the Application of Thomas Wesley Davey, Appellant, for a Writ of Mandamus against Rosslyn M. Cox, Mayor of the City of Middletown, and Others, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.
#### Mary S. Sidway, Respondent, Appellant, v. Harold S. Sidway, Defendant, and Frank S. Sidway, Appellant.

Motion for reargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Stapleton, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of BlastGard International, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the company on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
companys financial condition and results of operations.



November 3, 2004



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ James F. Gordon                     
|James F. Gordon, Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. Section 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                                                                                                            |       |       |                                                                                                              |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                            | ** ** | ** ** | ** **                                                                                                        |
| **/s/ Robert                Tarini**                                                                       | ** ** | ** ** | **/s/ Gino                M. Pereira**                                                                       |
|                                                                                                                 | ** ** | ** ** |                                                                                                                   |
| **Robert                  Tarini****Chief Executive Officer****Date:  November 21,                  2005** | ** ** | ** ** | **Gino                  M. Pereira****Chief Financial Officer****Date:  November 21,                  2005** |

|   |
|--------|

----
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00493-CV

In re Michael P. Mulligan

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

___________________________________________

Diane Henson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Henson

Filed: August 31, 2007