alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed 

April 1, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00195-CV

IN RE ALI CHOUDHRI, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

190th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-27197

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 10, 2014, relator Ali Choudhri filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 

52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Patricia 

Kerrigan, presiding judge of the 190th District Court of Harris County, to vacate 

her order dated March 4, 2014 overruling relator’s objections to the Special 

Master’s order compelling the production of relator’s tax returns.
2

Relator has not satisfied his burden to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus 

relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We also lift 

our stay granted on March 10, 2014. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and Brown.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

In the Interest of A.B. and S.M., children.)

________________________________ )

)

L.B., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-2436

)

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND )

FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM )

PROGRAM, )

)

Appellees. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed November 9, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for

Hillsborough County; Kim Hernandez

Vance, Judge.

Melody M. Dietsch, Branson, for 

Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Mary Soorus, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa,

for Appellee Department of Children &

Families.

Glenn E. Thomas, Thomasina Moore,

and Laura J. Lee of Guardian ad Litem

Program, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad

Litem.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AND EMPLOYMENTSERVICES

WORKING TOGETHER TO IMPROVE VETERAN EMPLOYMENT

Disabilities determined by VA to be related to your military service can lead to monthly non-taxable compensation, enrollment in the 

VA health care system, a 10-point hiring preference for federal employment and other important benefits. Ask your VA 

representative or Veterans Service Organization representative about DisabilityCompensation, Pension, Health Care, Caregiver 

Program, Career Services, Educational Assistance, Home Loan Guaranty, Insurance and/or Dependents and Survivors’ Benefits.

THE MANY ADVANTAGES OF HIRING VETERANS

SKILLS & QUALITIES

Our nation's Veterans and Servicemembers have acquired a wealth of knowledge, skills, and 

competencies through practical work experience. Some of the key skills and qualities Veterans and

Servicemembers have obtained include:

• Team-building 

• Mission-focus

• Proven leadership

• Accountability

• Perseverance

• Flexibility

• Adaptability

• Discipline

• Technical Training

• Strong Work Ethic

• Self-confidence

• Personal Integrity

These skills and qualities make Veterans and Servicemembers a valuable asset on the job.

EMPLOYMENT INITIATIVES 

There are several programs available through the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) that employers 

can utilize to find and hire Veterans, including the following:

• On-the-Job Training and Apprenticeship Programs

• Non-Paid Work Experience Program

• Special Employer Incentives Program

Visit the Veterans Employment Center for more information on employment resources and services 

and career tools.

PAID TRAINING & EDUCATION

• VA’s Education and Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment (VR&E) programs provide

training and education benefits for Veterans.
Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment-February 2016 

• Available training options include undergraduate and graduate degree programs, noncollege degree programs, on-the-job training, and apprenticeships. 

• VA may issue payments to schools and training facilities for tuition and fees, and directly to

Veterans for books and housing allowances. 

Please visit the following website to find information about VA education programs. Please visit the 

following website to find more information about the VR&E program. .
§ 140.910 Equipment. ( a ) *Company owned equipment.* Cost of company-owned equipment may be reimbursed for the average or actual cost of operation, light and running repairs, and depreciation, or at industry rates representative of actual costs as agreed to by the railroad, SHA, and FHWA. Reimbursement for company-owned vehicles may be made at average or actual costs or at rates of recorded use per mile which are representative of actual costs and agreed to by the company, SHA, and FHWA.
( b ) *Other equipment.* Where company owned equipment is not available, reimbursement will be limited to the amount of rental paid ( 1 ) to the lowest qualified bidder,
( 2 ) under existing continuing contracts at reasonable cost, or
( 3 ) as an exception, by negotiation where (b) (1) and (2) are impractical due to project location or schedule.
[40 FR 16057, Apr. 9, 1975, as amended at 47 FR 33955, Aug. 5, 1982]
### §460vv–3. Administration

Subject to valid existing rights, each wilderness area designated by section 460vv–1 of this title shall be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture in accordance with the provisions of the Wilderness Act of 1964 [16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.] governing areas designated by that Act as wilderness areas, except that with respect to any area designated in section 460vv–1 of this title, any reference in such provisions to the effective date of the Wilderness Act of 1964 shall be deemed to be a reference to the effective date of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 100–499, §5, Oct. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 2492.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Wilderness Act of 1964, referred to in text, probably means the Wilderness Act, Pub. L. 88–577, Sept. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 890, which is classified generally to chapter 23 (§1131 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1131 of this title and Tables.

The effective date of the Wilderness Act of 1964, referred to in text, means Sept. 3, 1964, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 88–577, which enacted chapter 23 of this title.

The effective date of this subchapter, referred to in text, means Oct. 18, 1988, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 100–499, which enacted this subchapter.
#### § 68.57 Judicial review of a final agency order in cases arising under section 274B.

In cases arising under section 274B of the INA, any person aggrieved by a final agency order issued under § 68.52(d) or § 68.55(d) may, within sixty (60) days after entry of the order, seek review of the final agency order in the United States Court of Appeals for the circuit in which the violation is alleged to have occurred or in which the employer resides or transacts business. If a final agency order is not appealed, the Special Counsel (or, if the Special Counsel fails to act, the person filing the charge, other than the Department of Homeland Security) may file a petition in the United States District Court for the district in which the violation that is the subject of the final agency order is alleged to have occurred, or in which the respondent resides or transacts business, requesting that the order be enforced.

[AG Order No.5812-2023, 88 FR 70591, Oct. 12, 2023]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.13



                                FIRST AMENDMENT
                     TO 7000 BROADWAY BUILDING OFFICE LEASE
                                    between
                        DENVER JACK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                      and
                            ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.
                             Dated October 30, 1995

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is to that certain lease agreement (the "Lease") dated
October 30, 1995, by and between DENVER JACK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ("Lessor") and
ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC. ("Lessee") with respect to approximately 4,022 square
feet of space on the third floor, known as Suite 310 (the "Premises"), in the
building known as 7000 Broadway, Denver, Colorado (the "Building"). In the event
of any conflict between the terms and provisions of the lease and the terms and
provisions of this First Amendment, the terms and provisions of this First
Amendment shall control.

     1) Amendment to Article 4 of the Lease Document.

     Landlord and Tenant do hereby agree that a portion of Article 4, Rent
     Adjustment, Paragraph (a) Real Estate Taxes and Paragraph (b) Operating
     Expenses shall be amended to read "the Base Year 1996 actual expenses".
     This will effectively change the Base Year for Operating Expense and Real
     Estate Tax adjustments from 1995 to 1996.

Except as herein specifically set forth, all other provisions of the Lease shall
remain in full force and effect and be binding upon the parties in accordance
with their terms.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals the day
and year fist above written.


                                     LESSOR:

                                     AMBERJACK, LTD., General Partner for
                                     DENVER JACK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                                     By:  CB Commercial Real Estate Group, Inc.
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                     Its: As Manager
                                         --------------------------------------
                                     By:  [ILLEGIBLE]
                                        ---------------------------------------

                                     Its: Senior Vice President
                                         --------------------------------------
                                          [ILLEGIBLE]
                                          Asst. V.P.

                                     LESSEE:

                                     ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.
                                     a Virginia corporation

                                     By:  John Greff
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                     Its: V.P. Finance & CFO
                                         --------------------------------------
#### § 810.212 Use without charge.

The use and occupancy of the lands made available by the State to the publicly owned transit authority may be without charge. Costs incidental to making the lands available for mass transit shall be borne by the publicly owned mass transit authority.

[81 FR 57741, Aug. 23, 2016]
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1718/2005

of 19 October 2005         

amending the rates of refunds applicable to certain products from the cereals and rice sector exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in ric (2), and in particular Article 14(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The rates of refund fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1585/2005 are hereby altered as shown in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 October 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 October 2005.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (CE) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 96.

(3)OJ L 254, 30.9.2005, p. 22.

----

ANNEX

Rates of the refunds applicable from 20 October 2005 to certain cereals and rice products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty (*1)

----

(*1)  The rates set out in this Annex are not applicable to exports to Bulgaria, with effect from 1 October 2004 and to the goods listed in Tables I and II to Protocol No 2 to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 exported to the Swiss Confederation or to the Principality of Liechtenstein with effect from 1 February 2005.

(1)  As far as agricultural products obtained from the processing of a basic product or/and assimilated products are concerned, the coefficients set out in Annex V to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1043/2005 is applicable.

(2)  The goods concerned fall under CN code 3505 10 50.

(3)  Goods listed in Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 or referred to in Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 2825/93 (OJ L 258, 16.10.1993, p. 6).

(4)  For syrups of CN codes NC 1702 30 99, 1702 40 90 and 1702 60 90, obtained from mixing glucose and fructose syrup, the export refund relates only to the glucose syrup.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4817 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4817

  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to ensure that certain 
    Department of Veterans Affairs medical facilities have physical 
    locations for the disposal of controlled substances medications.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 23, 2019

    Mr. Baird (for himself, Mr. Steube, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Thompson of 
    Pennsylvania, Mr. Cook, Mr. Moolenaar, Mr. Banks, Mr. Bishop of 
Georgia, Mr. Crow, Mr. Watkins, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Waltz, Mr. Pence, Mr. 
 Crenshaw, Mr. Abraham, Mr. Bost, Mr. Moulton, Ms. Stevens, Mr. Mast, 
Mr. Case, Mr. Taylor, Mr. Bucshon, Mr. Crawford, Mr. Reschenthaler, Mr. 
Bilirakis, Mr. Green of Tennessee, Mr. Allred, Mrs. Walorski, Mr. Lamb, 
 Mr. Rose of New York, Mr. Golden, Mrs. Brooks of Indiana, Mr. Bacon, 
Mr. Visclosky, Mrs. Wagner, Mrs. Luria, Mrs. Hartzler, Mrs. Miller, and 
Mr. Wenstrup) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to ensure that certain 
    Department of Veterans Affairs medical facilities have physical 
    locations for the disposal of controlled substances medications.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``VA Directly Returning Opioid 
Prescriptions Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR CERTAIN DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL 
              FACILITIES TO HAVE PHYSICAL LOCATION FOR THE DISPOSAL OF 
              CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES MEDICATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall ensure 
that each covered Department medical facility has a physical location 
where patients may dispose of controlled substances medications.
    (b) Covered Department Medical Facility.--In this section, the term 
``covered Department medical facility'' means a medical facility with--
            (1) an on-site pharmacy; or
            (2) a law enforcement officer.
                                 <all>
```
### §693c. Administration by Secretary of Agriculture of the Robert S. Kerr Center

The area designated as the Robert S. Kerr Memorial Arboretum and Nature Center shall be administered, protected, and developed within and as a part of the Ouachita National Forest by the Secretary of Agriculture in accordance with the laws, rules, and regulations applicable to national forests in such manner as in his judgment will best provide for the purposes of sections 693b to 693d of this title and to provide for such management, utilization, and disposal of the natural resources as in his judgment will promote or is compatible with and does not significantly impair the purposes for which the Robert S. Kerr Memorial Arboretum and Nature Center is established.

(Pub. L. 90–327, §2, June 4, 1968, 82 Stat. 169.)
# Official Journal C 191A/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.191.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 191A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5315 July 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.CA2010.191.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 191A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5315 July 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 191A/01 | Directorate-General for Competition (COMP) — Publication of the post of Chief Competition Economist (grade AD 14) — Engagement of a Temporary Agent under Article 2(a) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants — COM/2010/10275 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2010/C 191A/01

Directorate-General for Competition (COMP) — Publication of the post of Chief Competition Economist (grade AD 14) — Engagement of a Temporary Agent under Article 2(a) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants — COM/2010/10275

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | (FR) |
| --- | --- |
| 9 | |
| 19 | (FR) |
| 23 | (DE/ES/PT) |
| 28 | |
| 48 | |
| 53 | |
| 56 | |
| 57 | |
| 60 | |
| 61 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 62 | |
| 64 | |
| 66 | (BG/RO) |
| 67 | (ES) |
| 70 | (PT) |
| 73 | (FI) |
| 74 | (SV) |
| 91 | |
| 95 | |
| 104 | |
| 110 | |
| 116 | (ET) |
| 119 | |
| 129 | (EL) |
| 137 | (LT/LV/MT) |
| 138 | (BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK) |
| 143 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 144 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 146 | (DA/FI/MT) |
| 147 | (FI) |
| 149 | (IT) |
| 150 | (BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK) |
| 151 | |
| 155 | |
| 156 | (PL) |
| 157 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |
| 171 | (IT) |
| 178 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 184 | |
| 188 | (DA/DE/EN/FR/SL) |
| 190 | |
| 191 | |

5

(FR)

9

19

(FR)

23

(DE/ES/PT)

28

48

53

56

57

60

61

(DE/EN/FR)

62

64

66

(BG/RO)

67

(ES)

70

(PT)

73

(FI)

74

(SV)

91

95

104

110

116

(ET)

119

129

(EL)

137

(LT/LV/MT)

138

(BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK)

143

(DE/EN/FR)

144

(DE/EN/FR)

146

(DA/FI/MT)

147

(FI)

149

(IT)

150

(BG/CS/LT/PL/RO/SK)

151

155

156

(PL)

157

163

164

171

(IT)

178

(DE/EN/FR)

184

188

(DA/DE/EN/FR/SL)

190

191

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Moving To Multi-polluta

Sector-based Approach

Proposed Work Group Charter

Keith Mason

Elineth Torres

Lisa Conner

October 5, 2010

Disclaimer: Positions or views expressed here do not represent official EPA p
Charter for the Work Group

The following charter is an initial proposal for discu

determine topics and level of coverage to pu

 General issues

• How can EPA incentivize better coordination among sta

source programs and what are the benefits and challengincreased coordination?

• What are the regulatory and legal challenges to impleme

sector-based, multi-pollutant approaches?

• How should the coordination of regulatory timelines and 

requirements begin within a sector?

• Which advanced technologies will assist in controlling m

types of air pollution?

Disclaimer: Positions or views expressed here do not represent official EPA policy or gu
Charter for the Work Group

 General issues cont.

• What are the co-benefit, energy, and research implicatio

these technologies?

• What are the market-based mechanisms that EPA shou

investigating for sector-based approaches that would hesector to be more efficient?

• How can EPA better incentivize facilities to replace outd

poorly performing equipment and improve energy efficiereducing malfunctions? How does a sector-based or mpollutant approach help?

• Are there financing and investment programs that can b

to help implement sector-based approaches and speciftechnologies?

Disclaimer: Positions or views expressed here do not represent official EPA policy or gu
Charter for the Work Group

 Specific Issues

• Explore the challenges of reforming air pollution source 

definitions from unit-by-unit to facility-wide definitions.

• Explore the challenges of developing emission standard

toxics (NESHAPs) and criteria air pollutant programs (Non a common set of regulated air pollutants.

• Explore the challenges of coordinating the periodic revis

NAAQS with the required updates of NESHAPS and NSstandards.

• Explore the challenges of utilizing work practice standar

situations where quantifiable emission limitations and reneeded.

Disclaimer: Positions or views expressed here do not represent official EPA policy or gu
Questions and Discussio

Thank You

Contact Information

Keith Mason 

Mason.Keith@epa.gov

202-564-1678

Elineth Torres

Torres.elineth@epa.gov

919-541-4347
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robin Lecky, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Gravitas
International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
     prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: August 19, 2003 /s/ Robin Lecky


<PAGE>