# Official Journal L 42/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 42 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6314 February 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 42

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6314 February 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/196 of 13 February 2020 concerning the renewal of the authorisation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase produced by Aspergillus niger CBS 109.713 as a feed additive for chickens for fattening, turkeys for fattening, turkeys reared for breeding, minor avian species (except laying birds) and ornamental birds and repealing Regulations (EC) No 1380/2007, (EC) No 1096/2009 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 843/2012 (holder of authorisation BASF SE) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/197 of 13 February 2020 concerning the authorisation of allura red AC as a feed additive for cats and dogs (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/198 of 13 February 2020 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 251/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the establishment of the register of geographical indications protected in the sector of aromatised wine products and the listing of the existing geographical designations in that register | 8 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/199 of 13 February 2020 making imports of continuous filament glass fibre products originating in Egypt subject to registration | 10 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2020/200 of 11 February 2020 on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia (EUMM Georgia) and repealing Decision (CFSP) 2018/2075 (EUMM Georgia/1/2020) | 15 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/201 of 12 February 2020 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural development (EAFRD)
  (notified under document C(2020) 541) | 17 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/196 of 13 February 2020 concerning the renewal of the authorisation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase produced by Aspergillus niger CBS 109.713 as a feed additive for chickens for fattening, turkeys for fattening, turkeys reared for breeding, minor avian species (except laying birds) and ornamental birds and repealing Regulations (EC) No 1380/2007, (EC) No 1096/2009 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 843/2012 (holder of authorisation BASF SE) (
  1
  )

Aspergillus niger

1

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/197 of 13 February 2020 concerning the authorisation of allura red AC as a feed additive for cats and dogs (
  1
  )

1

4

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/198 of 13 February 2020 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 251/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the establishment of the register of geographical indications protected in the sector of aromatised wine products and the listing of the existing geographical designations in that register

8

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/199 of 13 February 2020 making imports of continuous filament glass fibre products originating in Egypt subject to registration

10

DECISIONS

*

Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2020/200 of 11 February 2020 on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia (EUMM Georgia) and repealing Decision (CFSP) 2018/2075 (EUMM Georgia/1/2020)

15

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/201 of 12 February 2020 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural development (EAFRD)
  (notified under document C(2020) 541)

(notified under document C(2020) 541)

17

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.

---

II Non-legislative acts

REGULATIONS

| 14.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 42/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 42/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/196

of 13 February 2020

concerning the renewal of the authorisation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase produced by Aspergillus niger CBS 109.713 as a feed additive for chickens for fattening, turkeys for fattening, turkeys reared for breeding, minor avian species (except laying birds) and ornamental birds and repealing Regulations (EC) No 1380/2007, (EC) No 1096/2009 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 843/2012 (holder of authorisation BASF SE)

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition (1), and in particular Article 9(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 provides for the authorisation of additives for use in animal nutrition and for the grounds and procedures for granting and renewing such authorisation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 provides for the authorisation of additives for use in animal nutrition and for the grounds and procedures for granting and renewing such authorisation.

| (2) | Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase produced by Aspergillus niger CBS 109.713 was authorised for 10 years as a feed additive for turkeys for fattening by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1380/2007 (2), for ducks and chickens for fattening by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1096/2009 (3) and for turkeys reared for breeding, minor avian species for fattening and reared for laying or breeding and ornamental birds by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 843/2012 (4). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase produced by Aspergillus niger CBS 109.713 was authorised for 10 years as a feed additive for turkeys for fattening by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1380/2007 (2), for ducks and chickens for fattening by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1096/2009 (3) and for turkeys reared for breeding, minor avian species for fattening and reared for laying or breeding and ornamental birds by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 843/2012 (4).

| (3) | In accordance with Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, an application was submitted by the holder of that authorisation for the renewal of the authorisation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase produced by Aspergillus niger CBS 109.713 as a feed additive for chickens for fattening, turkeys for fattening, turkeys reared for breeding, minor avian species (except laying birds) and ornamental birds, requesting that additive to be classified in the additive category ‘zootechnical additives’. That application was accompanied by the particulars and documents required under Article 14(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, an application was submitted by the holder of that authorisation for the renewal of the authorisation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase produced by Aspergillus niger CBS 109.713 as a feed additive for chickens for fattening, turkeys for fattening, turkeys reared for breeding, minor avian species (except laying birds) and ornamental birds, requesting that additive to be classified in the additive category ‘zootechnical additives’. That application was accompanied by the particulars and documents required under Article 14(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003.

| (4) | The European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’) concluded in its opinion of 27 February 2019 (5) that the applicant has provided data demonstrating that the additive complies with the conditions of authorisation. The Authority stated that the additive is safe for the target species, for the consumers and the environment. It also concluded that the additive is considered as a potential dermal and respiratory sensitiser. Therefore, the Commission considers that appropriate protective measures should be taken to prevent adverse effects on human health, in particular as regards the users of the additive. The Authority does not consider that there is a need for specific requirements of post-market monitoring. It also verified the report on the method of analysis of the feed additive in feed submitted by the Reference Laboratory set up by Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’) concluded in its opinion of 27 February 2019 (5) that the applicant has provided data demonstrating that the additive complies with the conditions of authorisation. The Authority stated that the additive is safe for the target species, for the consumers and the environment. It also concluded that the additive is considered as a potential dermal and respiratory sensitiser. Therefore, the Commission considers that appropriate protective measures should be taken to prevent adverse effects on human health, in particular as regards the users of the additive. The Authority does not consider that there is a need for specific requirements of post-market monitoring. It also verified the report on the method of analysis of the feed additive in feed submitted by the Reference Laboratory set up by Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003.

| (5) | The assessment of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase produced by Aspergillus niger CBS 109.713 shows that the conditions for authorisation, as provided for in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, are satisfied. Accordingly, the authorisation of that additive should be renewed as specified in the Annex to this Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The assessment of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase produced by Aspergillus niger CBS 109.713 shows that the conditions for authorisation, as provided for in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, are satisfied. Accordingly, the authorisation of that additive should be renewed as specified in the Annex to this Regulation.

| (6) | As a consequence of the renewal of the authorisation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase produced by Aspergillus niger CBS 109.713 as a feed additive under the conditions laid down in the Annex to this Regulation, Regulations (EC) No 1380/2007, (EC) No 1096/2009 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 843/2012 should be repealed. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

As a consequence of the renewal of the authorisation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase produced by Aspergillus niger CBS 109.713 as a feed additive under the conditions laid down in the Annex to this Regulation, Regulations (EC) No 1380/2007, (EC) No 1096/2009 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 843/2012 should be repealed.

| (7) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed, |
| --- | --- |

(7)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The authorisation of the additive specified in the Annex, belonging to the additive category ‘zootechnical additives’ and to the functional group ‘digestibility enhancers’, is renewed subject to the conditions laid down in that Annex.

Article 2

Regulations (EC) No 1380/2007, (EC) No 1096/2009 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 843/2012 are repealed.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 February 2020.

For the Commission

The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, p. 29.

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1380/2007 of 26 November 2007 concerning the authorisation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase (Natugrain Wheat TS) as a feed additive (OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 21).

2

(3)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1096/2009 of 16 November 2009 concerning the authorisation of an enzyme preparation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase produced by Aspergillus niger (CBS 109.713) as a feed additive for chickens for fattening and the authorisation of a new use of this preparation as a feed additive for ducks (holder of authorisation BASF SE) and amending Regulation (EC) No 1458/2005 (OJ L 301, 17.11.2009, p. 3).

3

Aspergillus niger

(4)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 843/2012 of 18 September 2012 concerning the authorisation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase produced by Aspergillus niger (CBS 109.713) as a feed additive for turkeys reared for breeding, minor avian species for fattening and reared for laying or breeding and ornamental birds (holder of authorisation BASF SE) (OJ L 252, 19.9.2012, p. 23).

4

Aspergillus niger

(5)  
  EFSA Journal 2019;17(3):5652.

5

EFSA Journal

---

ANNEX

| Identification number of the additive | Name of the holder of authorisation | Additive | Composition, chemical formula, description, analytical method | Species or category of animal | Maximum age | Minimum content | Maximum content | Other provisions | End of period of authorisation |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Unit of activity/kg of complete feedingstuff with a moisture content of 12 % |
| Category of zootechnical additives. Functional group: digestibility enhancers |
| 4a62 | BASF SE | Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase
  EC 3.2.1.8 | Additive composition

  Preparation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase
  produced by Aspergillus niger (CBS 109.713) having a minimum activity of:
  Solid form: 5 600 TXU (1)/g
  Liquid form: 5 600 TXU/ml | Turkeys for fattening
  Turkeys reared for breeding | — | 560 TXU | — | 1. | In the directions for use of the additive and premixtures, the storage conditions and stability to heat treatment shall be indicated. |

Identification number of the additive

Name of the holder of authorisation

Additive

Composition, chemical formula, description, analytical method

Species or category of animal

Maximum age

Minimum content

Maximum content

Other provisions

End of period of authorisation

Unit of activity/kg of complete feedingstuff with a moisture content of 12 %

Category of zootechnical additives. Functional group: digestibility enhancers

4a62

BASF SE

Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase

EC 3.2.1.8

Additive composition

Preparation of endo-1,4-beta-xylanase

produced by Aspergillus niger (CBS 109.713) having a minimum activity of:

Solid form: 5 600 TXU (1)/g

Liquid form: 5 600 TXU/ml

Turkeys for fattening

Turkeys reared for breeding

—

560 TXU

—

1.

In the directions for use of the additive and premixtures, the storage conditions and stability to heat treatment shall be indicated.

| 2. | For users of the additive and premixtures, feed business operators shall establish operational procedures and organisational measures to address potential risks resulting from its use. Where those risks cannot be eliminated or reduced to a minimum by such procedures and measures, the additive and premixtures shall be used with personal protective equipment, including breathing protection. |
| --- | --- |

2.

For users of the additive and premixtures, feed business operators shall establish operational procedures and organisational measures to address potential risks resulting from its use. Where those risks cannot be eliminated or reduced to a minimum by such procedures and measures, the additive and premixtures shall be used with personal protective equipment, including breathing protection.

5.3.2030

Characterisation of the active substance:

Endo-1,4-betaxylanase produced by Aspergillus niger (CBS 109.713)

Chickens for fattening

Ornamental birds

Minor avian species other than laying birds

—

280 TXU

—

Analytical method
   (2)

Viscosimetric method based on decrease of viscosity produced by action of endo1,4-beta-xylanase on the xylan-containing substrate (wheat arabinoxylan) at pH 3,5 and 55 °C.

---

(1)  1 TXU is the amount of enzyme which liberates 5 micromole of reducing sugars (xylose equivalents) from wheat arabinoxylan per minute at pH 3,5 and 55 °C.

(2)  Details of the analytical methods are available at the following address of the Reference Laboratory: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/eurl/feed-additives/evaluation-reports.

---

| 14.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 42/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 42/4

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/197

of 13 February 2020

concerning the authorisation of allura red AC as a feed additive for cats and dogs

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition (1), and in particular Article 9(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 provides for the authorisation of additives for use in animal nutrition and for the grounds and procedures for granting such authorisation. Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 provides for the re-evaluation of additives authorised pursuant to Council Directive 70/524/EEC (2): |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 provides for the authorisation of additives for use in animal nutrition and for the grounds and procedures for granting such authorisation. Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 provides for the re-evaluation of additives authorised pursuant to Council Directive 70/524/EEC (2):

| (2) | Allura red AC was authorised without a time limit in accordance with Directive 70/524/EEC as a feed additive for dogs and cats belonging to the group ‘colourants, including pigments’ under the heading ‘colouring agents authorised for colouring foodstuffs by Community rules’. The additive was subsequently entered in the Register of feed additives as an existing product, in accordance with Article 10(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Allura red AC was authorised without a time limit in accordance with Directive 70/524/EEC as a feed additive for dogs and cats belonging to the group ‘colourants, including pigments’ under the heading ‘colouring agents authorised for colouring foodstuffs by Community rules’. The additive was subsequently entered in the Register of feed additives as an existing product, in accordance with Article 10(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 in conjunction with Article 7 thereof, an application was submitted for the re-evaluation of allura red AC as a feed additive for dogs and cats. The applicant requested the additive to be classified in the additive category ‘sensory additive’ and in the functional group ‘colourants’. The application was accompanied by the particulars and documents required under Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 in conjunction with Article 7 thereof, an application was submitted for the re-evaluation of allura red AC as a feed additive for dogs and cats. The applicant requested the additive to be classified in the additive category ‘sensory additive’ and in the functional group ‘colourants’. The application was accompanied by the particulars and documents required under Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003.

| (4) | The European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’) concluded in its opinions of 24 April 2012 (3), 15 May 2013 (4) and 20 October 2015 (5) that, under the proposed conditions of use, allura red AC does not have an adverse effect on animal health or the environment. It also concluded that the substance should be considered potentially harmful for the user of the additive as a result of skin, eye, or inhalation exposure. Therefore, the Commission considers that appropriate protective measures should be taken to prevent adverse effects on human health, in particular as regards the users of the additive. In accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 429/2008 (6), phase I of the environmental risk assessment has determined that allura red AC, as an additive intended for non-food producing animals, is exempted from further assessment due to the unlikelihood of a significant environmental effect, there being no scientifically-based evidence for concern having been identified by the Authority in its above-mentioned opinions. The Authority further concluded that the additive concerned is effective in adding colour to feedingstuffs. The Authority does not consider that there is a need for specific requirements of post-market monitoring. It also verified the report on the method of analysis of the feed additive in feed submitted by the Reference Laboratory set up by Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’) concluded in its opinions of 24 April 2012 (3), 15 May 2013 (4) and 20 October 2015 (5) that, under the proposed conditions of use, allura red AC does not have an adverse effect on animal health or the environment. It also concluded that the substance should be considered potentially harmful for the user of the additive as a result of skin, eye, or inhalation exposure. Therefore, the Commission considers that appropriate protective measures should be taken to prevent adverse effects on human health, in particular as regards the users of the additive. In accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 429/2008 (6), phase I of the environmental risk assessment has determined that allura red AC, as an additive intended for non-food producing animals, is exempted from further assessment due to the unlikelihood of a significant environmental effect, there being no scientifically-based evidence for concern having been identified by the Authority in its above-mentioned opinions. The Authority further concluded that the additive concerned is effective in adding colour to feedingstuffs. The Authority does not consider that there is a need for specific requirements of post-market monitoring. It also verified the report on the method of analysis of the feed additive in feed submitted by the Reference Laboratory set up by Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003.

| (5) | The assessment of allura red AC shows that the conditions for authorisation, as provided for in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, are satisfied. Accordingly, the use of that additive should be authorised as specified in the Annex to this Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The assessment of allura red AC shows that the conditions for authorisation, as provided for in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, are satisfied. Accordingly, the use of that additive should be authorised as specified in the Annex to this Regulation.

| (6) | Since safety reasons do not require the immediate application of the modifications to the conditions of authorisation of the substance concerned, it is appropriate to allow a transitional period for interested parties to prepare themselves to meet the new requirements resulting from the authorisation. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

Since safety reasons do not require the immediate application of the modifications to the conditions of authorisation of the substance concerned, it is appropriate to allow a transitional period for interested parties to prepare themselves to meet the new requirements resulting from the authorisation.

| (7) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed, |
| --- | --- |

(7)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Authorisation

The substance specified in the Annex, belonging to the additive category ‘sensory additives’ and to the functional group ‘colourants’, is authorised as an additive in animal nutrition, subject to the conditions laid down in that Annex.

Article 2

Transitional measures

1.   The substance specified in the Annex and premixtures containing that substance, which are produced and labelled before 5 September 2020 in accordance with the rules applicable before 5 March 2020 may continue to be placed on the market and used until the existing stocks are exhausted.

2.   Feed materials and compound feed containing the substance specified in the Annex which are produced and labelled before 5 March 2022 in accordance with the rules applicable before 5 March 2020 may continue to be placed on the market and used until the existing stocks are exhausted.

Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 February 2020.

For the Commission

The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, p. 29.

1

(2)  Council Directive 70/524/EEC of 23 November 1970 concerning additives in feedingstuffs (OJ L 270, 14.12.1970, p. 1).

2

(3)  
  EFSA Journal 2012; 10(5):2675.

3

EFSA Journal

(4)  
  EFSA Journal 2013;11(6):3234.

4

EFSA Journal

(5)  
  EFSA Journal 2015; 13(11):4270.

5

EFSA Journal

(6)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 429/2008 of 25 April 2008 on detailed rules for the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the preparation and the presentation of applications and the assessment and the authorisation of feed additives (OJ L 133, 22.5.2008, p. 1).

6

---

ANNEX

| Identification number of the additive | Additive | Composition, chemical formula, description, analytical method | Species or category of animal | Maximum age | Minimum content | Maximum content | Other provisions | End of period of authorisation |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| mg of active substance of kg of complete feedingstuff with a moisture content of 12 % |
| Category: Sensory additives. Functional group: Colourants. (i) substances that add or restore colour in feedingstuffs |
| 2a129 | Allura Red AC | Additive composition

  Allura Red AC described as the sodium salt as the principal component.
  Solid form (powder or granules)

  Characterisation of the active substance as the sodium salt

  Allura Red AC consists essentially of disodium 2-hydroxy-1-(2- methoxy-5-methyl-4-sulfonato-phenylazo) naphthalene-6-sulfonate and subsidiary colouring matters together with sodium chloride and/or sodium sulphate as the principal uncoloured components.
  The calcium and the potassium salts are also permitted
  Solid form (powder or granules) produced by chemical synthesis
  Chemical formula: C18H14N2Na2O8S2

  CAS number: 25956-17-6
  Purity criteria
  Content not less than 85 % total colouring matters, calculated as the sodium salt (assay)
  Water insoluble matter: ≤ 0,2 %
  Subsidiary colouring matters: ≤ 3 %
  Organic compounds other than
  colouring matters:






  — | 6-hydroxy-2-naphthalene sulfonic acid, sodium salt: ≤ 0,3 % |

Identification number of the additive

Additive

Composition, chemical formula, description, analytical method

Species or category of animal

Maximum age

Minimum content

Maximum content

Other provisions

End of period of authorisation

mg of active substance of kg of complete feedingstuff with a moisture content of 12 %

Category: Sensory additives. Functional group: Colourants. (i) substances that add or restore colour in feedingstuffs

2a129

Allura Red AC

Additive composition

Allura Red AC described as the sodium salt as the principal component.

Solid form (powder or granules)

Characterisation of the active substance as the sodium salt

Allura Red AC consists essentially of disodium 2-hydroxy-1-(2- methoxy-5-methyl-4-sulfonato-phenylazo) naphthalene-6-sulfonate and subsidiary colouring matters together with sodium chloride and/or sodium sulphate as the principal uncoloured components.

The calcium and the potassium salts are also permitted

Solid form (powder or granules) produced by chemical synthesis

Chemical formula: C18H14N2Na2O8S2

CAS number: 25956-17-6

Purity criteria

Content not less than 85 % total colouring matters, calculated as the sodium salt (assay)

Water insoluble matter: ≤ 0,2 %

Subsidiary colouring matters: ≤ 3 %

Organic compounds other than

colouring matters:

—

6-hydroxy-2-naphthalene sulfonic acid, sodium salt: ≤ 0,3 %

| — | 4-amino-5-methoxy-2- methylbenezene sulfonic acid: ≤ 0,2 % |
| --- | --- |

—

4-amino-5-methoxy-2- methylbenezene sulfonic acid: ≤ 0,2 %

| — | 6,6-oxybis (2-naphthalene sulfonic acid) disodium salt: ≤ 1 % |
| --- | --- |

—

6,6-oxybis (2-naphthalene sulfonic acid) disodium salt: ≤ 1 %

Unsulfonated primary aromatic amines: ≤ 0,01 % (calculated as aniline)

Ether extractable matter: ≤ 0,2 % from a solution of pH 7

Analytical method
   (1)

For the quantification of Allura Red AC in the feed additive:

| — | spectrophotometry at 504 nm (Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012 referring to FAO JECFA monographs n. 1 (Vol. 4)) |
| --- | --- |

—

spectrophotometry at 504 nm (Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012 referring to FAO JECFA monographs n. 1 (Vol. 4))

| — | For the quantification of Allura Red AC in feedingstuffs: |
| --- | --- |

—

For the quantification of Allura Red AC in feedingstuffs:

| — | high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) |
| --- | --- |

—

high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)

Cats

-

-

308

| 1. | In the directions for use of the additive and premixture, the storage conditions and stability to heat treatment shall be indicated. |
| --- | --- |

1.

In the directions for use of the additive and premixture, the storage conditions and stability to heat treatment shall be indicated.

| 2. | For users of the additive and premixtures, feed business operators shall establish operational procedures and organisational measures to address potential risks resulting from its use. Where those risks cannot be eliminated or reduced to a minimum by such procedures and measures, the additive and premixtures shall be used with personal protective equipment, including breathing protection, safety glasses and gloves. |
| --- | --- |

2.

For users of the additive and premixtures, feed business operators shall establish operational procedures and organisational measures to address potential risks resulting from its use. Where those risks cannot be eliminated or reduced to a minimum by such procedures and measures, the additive and premixtures shall be used with personal protective equipment, including breathing protection, safety glasses and gloves.

5.3.2030

Dogs

-

-

370

---

(1)  Details of the analytical methods are available at the following address of the Reference Laboratory: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/eurl/feed-additives/evaluation-reports

---

| 14.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 42/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 42/8

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/198

of 13 February 2020

laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 251/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the establishment of the register of geographical indications protected in the sector of aromatised wine products and the listing of the existing geographical designations in that register

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 251/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the definition, description, presentation, labelling and the protection of geographical indications of aromatised wine products and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 1601/91 (1), and in particular Article 21 and Article 26(1) and (3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex II to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1601/91 (2) set out the list of geographical designations of aromatised wine products granted protection under that Regulation. Regulation (EEC) No 1601/91 was repealed and replaced by Regulation (EU) No 251/2014. Chapter III of Regulation (EU) No 251/2014 lays down rules on the protection of geographical indications in the aromatised wines sector. That Chapter also empowers the Commission to inter alia adopt implementing acts to establish and maintain a publically accessible electronic register of geographical indications for aromatised wine products protected under that regulation. That register should be maintained in a Commission website. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex II to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1601/91 (2) set out the list of geographical designations of aromatised wine products granted protection under that Regulation. Regulation (EEC) No 1601/91 was repealed and replaced by Regulation (EU) No 251/2014. Chapter III of Regulation (EU) No 251/2014 lays down rules on the protection of geographical indications in the aromatised wines sector. That Chapter also empowers the Commission to inter alia adopt implementing acts to establish and maintain a publically accessible electronic register of geographical indications for aromatised wine products protected under that regulation. That register should be maintained in a Commission website.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 26(1) of Regulation (EU) No 251/2014, existing geographical designations of aromatised wine products listed in Annex II of Regulation (EEC) No 1601/91 or submitted to a Member State and approved by that Member State before 27 March 2014 are automatically protected as geographical indications under that Regulation. However, in accordance with Article 26(3) of the Regulation, existing geographical designations for which the concerned Member State has not transmitted the technical file and the national decision of approval to the Commission by 28 March 2017 should be removed from the register. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 26(1) of Regulation (EU) No 251/2014, existing geographical designations of aromatised wine products listed in Annex II of Regulation (EEC) No 1601/91 or submitted to a Member State and approved by that Member State before 27 March 2014 are automatically protected as geographical indications under that Regulation. However, in accordance with Article 26(3) of the Regulation, existing geographical designations for which the concerned Member State has not transmitted the technical file and the national decision of approval to the Commission by 28 March 2017 should be removed from the register.

| (3) | By 28 March 2017, the Commission received the technical file and the national decision of approval of the existing geographical designations of aromatised wine products listed in Annex II of Regulation (EEC) No 1601/91‘Nürnberger Glühwein’ (on 17 March 2017), ‘Samoborski bermet’
  (on 23 March 2017), ‘Thüringer Glühwein’
  (on 17 March 2017) and ‘Vermut di Torino’
  or
  ‘Vermouth di Torino’
  (on 24 March 2017). |
| --- | --- |

(3)

By 28 March 2017, the Commission received the technical file and the national decision of approval of the existing geographical designations of aromatised wine products listed in Annex II of Regulation (EEC) No 1601/91‘Nürnberger Glühwein’ (on 17 March 2017), ‘Samoborski bermet’
  (on 23 March 2017), ‘Thüringer Glühwein’
  (on 17 March 2017) and ‘Vermut di Torino’
  or
  ‘Vermouth di Torino’
  (on 24 March 2017).

| (4) | The geographical designation ‘Vino Naranja del Condado de Huelva’
  was approved by Spain on 6 July 2011. The Commission received the related technical file and national decision of approval on 14 March 2017. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The geographical designation ‘Vino Naranja del Condado de Huelva’
  was approved by Spain on 6 July 2011. The Commission received the related technical file and national decision of approval on 14 March 2017.

| (5) | The Commission assessed the existing geographical designations ‘Nürnberger Glühwein’, ‘Samoborski bermet’, ‘Thüringer Glühwein’, ‘Vermut di Torino’
  or
  ‘Vermouth di Torino’
  and ‘Vino Naranja del Condado de Huelva’
  and concluded that they comply with the definition of geographical indication as provided for in point (3) of Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 251/2014. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The Commission assessed the existing geographical designations ‘Nürnberger Glühwein’, ‘Samoborski bermet’, ‘Thüringer Glühwein’, ‘Vermut di Torino’
  or
  ‘Vermouth di Torino’
  and ‘Vino Naranja del Condado de Huelva’
  and concluded that they comply with the definition of geographical indication as provided for in point (3) of Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 251/2014.

| (6) | Therefore, the existing geographical designations ‘Nürnberger Glühwein’, ‘Samoborski bermet’, ‘Thüringer Glühwein’, ‘Vermut di Torino’
  or
  ‘Vermouth di Torino’
  and ‘Vino Naranja del Condado de Huelva’
  should be entered in the register as geographical indications for aromatised wine products protected under Regulation (EU) No 251/2014. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

Therefore, the existing geographical designations ‘Nürnberger Glühwein’, ‘Samoborski bermet’, ‘Thüringer Glühwein’, ‘Vermut di Torino’
  or
  ‘Vermouth di Torino’
  and ‘Vino Naranja del Condado de Huelva’
  should be entered in the register as geographical indications for aromatised wine products protected under Regulation (EU) No 251/2014.

| (7) | The Commission has not received the technical file and the national decision of approval of the existing geographical designation ‘Vermouth de Chambéry’
  . The existing geographical designation ‘Vermouth de Chambéry’
  has therefore lost the protection as of 29 March 2017. Since the register has yet to be established, the Commission should refrain from listing the name ‘Vermouth de Chambéry’
  in the register. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

The Commission has not received the technical file and the national decision of approval of the existing geographical designation ‘Vermouth de Chambéry’
  . The existing geographical designation ‘Vermouth de Chambéry’
  has therefore lost the protection as of 29 March 2017. Since the register has yet to be established, the Commission should refrain from listing the name ‘Vermouth de Chambéry’
  in the register.

| (8) | For the sake of clarity and following the request of the applicants, the name of the existing Italian geographical designation indicated in Annex II to Regulation (EEC) No 1601/91 as either ‘Vermouth di Torino’
  or ‘Vermut di Torino’
  depending on the linguistic versions of the Regulation, should be entered in the register as ‘Vermut di Torino’ / ‘Vermouth di Torino’, |
| --- | --- |

(8)

For the sake of clarity and following the request of the applicants, the name of the existing Italian geographical designation indicated in Annex II to Regulation (EEC) No 1601/91 as either ‘Vermouth di Torino’
  or ‘Vermut di Torino’
  depending on the linguistic versions of the Regulation, should be entered in the register as ‘Vermut di Torino’ / ‘Vermouth di Torino’,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Register

1.   The electronic register of geographical indications for aromatised wine products (‘the register’) referred to in Article 21 of Regulation (EU) No 251/2014 is hereby established by means of a digital system which the Commission shall make accessible to the public.

2.   The register shall list the name (or names) of the aromatised wine products protected as geographical indications under Regulation (EU) No 251/2014.

Article 2

Existing geographical designations

The following existing geographical designations are listed in the register as geographical indications protected in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 251/2014:

| (a) | ‘Nürnberger Glühwein’; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

‘Nürnberger Glühwein’;

| (b) | ‘Samoborski bermet’; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

‘Samoborski bermet’;

| (c) | ‘Thüringer Glühwein’; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

‘Thüringer Glühwein’;

| (d) | ‘Vermut di Torino’ / ‘Vermouth di Torino’; |
| --- | --- |

(d)

‘Vermut di Torino’ / ‘Vermouth di Torino’;

| (e) | ‘Vino Naranja del Condado de Huelva’. |
| --- | --- |

(e)

‘Vino Naranja del Condado de Huelva’.

Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 February 2020.

For the Commission

The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 84, 20.3.2014, p. 14.

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 1601/91 of 10 June 1991 laying down general rules on the definition, description and presentation of aromatized wines, aromatized wine- based drinks and aromatized wine-product cocktails (OJ L 149, 14.6.1991, p. 1).

2

---

| 14.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 42/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 42/10

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/199

of 13 February 2020

making imports of continuous filament glass fibre products originating in Egypt subject to registration

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Union (1) ( the ‘basic Regulation’) and in particular Article 24(5a) thereof,

After informing the Member States,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 7 June 2019, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) announced, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2) (‘the notice of initiation’), the initiation of an anti-subsidy proceeding with regard to imports into the Union of continuous filament glass fibre products originating in Egypt. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 7 June 2019, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) announced, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2) (‘the notice of initiation’), the initiation of an anti-subsidy proceeding with regard to imports into the Union of continuous filament glass fibre products originating in Egypt.

| (2) | This was following a complaint lodged on 24 April 2019 by the European Glass fibre Producers Association ‘APFE’ (‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of continuous filament glass fibre products. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

This was following a complaint lodged on 24 April 2019 by the European Glass fibre Producers Association ‘APFE’ (‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of continuous filament glass fibre products.

| (3) | This anti-subsidy investigation follows the initiation of a separate investigation by the Commission to examine the existence of injurious dumping with respect to the same product but originating in Egypt and Bahrain, which was initiated on 3 May 2019 (3). |
| --- | --- |

(3)

This anti-subsidy investigation follows the initiation of a separate investigation by the Commission to examine the existence of injurious dumping with respect to the same product but originating in Egypt and Bahrain, which was initiated on 3 May 2019 (3).

| (4) | The investigation of subsidisation and injury covers the period from 1 April 2018 to 31 March 2019 (‘the investigation period’). The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covers the period from 1 January 2016 to the end of the investigation period (‘the period considered’). |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The investigation of subsidisation and injury covers the period from 1 April 2018 to 31 March 2019 (‘the investigation period’). The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covers the period from 1 January 2016 to the end of the investigation period (‘the period considered’).

1.   Product subject to registration

Product subject to registration

| (5) | The product subject to registration (‘the product concerned’) is chopped glass fibre strands, of a length of not more than 50 mm (‘chopped strands’); glass fibre rovings, excluding glass fibre rovings which are impregnated and coated and have a loss on ignition of more than 3 % (as determined by the ISO Standard 1887) (‘rovings’); and mats made of glass fibre filaments excluding mats of glass wool (‘mats’) originating in Egypt, currently falling under CN codes 7019 11 00, ex 7019 12 00, 7019 31 00 (TARIC codes 7019120022, 7019120025, 7019120026 and 7019120039).The product concerned is known as ‘glass fibre reinforcements’ or ‘GFR’. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The product subject to registration (‘the product concerned’) is chopped glass fibre strands, of a length of not more than 50 mm (‘chopped strands’); glass fibre rovings, excluding glass fibre rovings which are impregnated and coated and have a loss on ignition of more than 3 % (as determined by the ISO Standard 1887) (‘rovings’); and mats made of glass fibre filaments excluding mats of glass wool (‘mats’) originating in Egypt, currently falling under CN codes 7019 11 00, ex 7019 12 00, 7019 31 00 (TARIC codes 7019120022, 7019120025, 7019120026 and 7019120039).The product concerned is known as ‘glass fibre reinforcements’ or ‘GFR’.

2.   Grounds for registration

Grounds for registration

| (6) | According to Article 24(5a) of the basic Regulation, the Commission shall direct the customs authorities to take the appropriate steps to register imports during the period of pre-disclosure under Article 29a, so that measures may subsequently be applied against those imports from the date of such registration, unless it has sufficient evidence that the requirements either under Article 16(4)(c) or Article 16(4)(d) of the basic Regulation are not met. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

According to Article 24(5a) of the basic Regulation, the Commission shall direct the customs authorities to take the appropriate steps to register imports during the period of pre-disclosure under Article 29a, so that measures may subsequently be applied against those imports from the date of such registration, unless it has sufficient evidence that the requirements either under Article 16(4)(c) or Article 16(4)(d) of the basic Regulation are not met.

| (7) | The Commission therefore analysed the requirements of Article 16(4)(c) and (d) of the basic Regulation as to whether imports should be registered during the period of pre-disclosure. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

The Commission therefore analysed the requirements of Article 16(4)(c) and (d) of the basic Regulation as to whether imports should be registered during the period of pre-disclosure.

| (8) | These Articles require the Commission to examine:






  — | whether there are critical circumstances where, for the subsidised product in question, injury which is difficult to repair is caused by massive imports in a relatively short period of a product benefitting from countervailable subsidies, and |
| --- | --- | --- |

(8)

These Articles require the Commission to examine:

—

whether there are critical circumstances where, for the subsidised product in question, injury which is difficult to repair is caused by massive imports in a relatively short period of a product benefitting from countervailable subsidies, and

| — | whether it is deemed necessary to assess countervailing duties retroactively on those imports in order to preclude the recurrence of such injury. |
| --- | --- |

—

whether it is deemed necessary to assess countervailing duties retroactively on those imports in order to preclude the recurrence of such injury.

2.1.   Product benefiting from countervailable subsidies

Product benefiting from countervailable subsidies

| (9) | As regards subsidisation, the Commission has at its disposal sufficient evidence at this stage that exports of the product concerned from Egypt are being subsidised, and that the exporting producer Jushi in Egypt benefited from these subsidies during the investigation period. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

As regards subsidisation, the Commission has at its disposal sufficient evidence at this stage that exports of the product concerned from Egypt are being subsidised, and that the exporting producer Jushi in Egypt benefited from these subsidies during the investigation period.

| (10) | The subsidy practices alleged in the complaint include:






  — | Direct transfer of funds, |
| --- | --- | --- |

(10)

The subsidy practices alleged in the complaint include:

—

Direct transfer of funds,

| — | Government revenue foregone or not collected, and |
| --- | --- |

—

Government revenue foregone or not collected, and

| — | Government provision of goods or services for less than adequate remuneration. |
| --- | --- |

—

Government provision of goods or services for less than adequate remuneration.

| (11) | As set out in the Notice of Initiation, the complainant alleged that those measures are subsidies since they involve a financial contribution from the Government of Egypt (including public bodies) and confer a benefit to the exporting producer of the product concerned. They are alleged to be limited to certain enterprises or industries or group of enterprises and/or contingent upon export performance and are therefore specific and countervailable. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

As set out in the Notice of Initiation, the complainant alleged that those measures are subsidies since they involve a financial contribution from the Government of Egypt (including public bodies) and confer a benefit to the exporting producer of the product concerned. They are alleged to be limited to certain enterprises or industries or group of enterprises and/or contingent upon export performance and are therefore specific and countervailable.

| (12) | The evidence of subsidisation was made available in the open version of the complaint and was further analysed in the memorandum on sufficiency of evidence. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

The evidence of subsidisation was made available in the open version of the complaint and was further analysed in the memorandum on sufficiency of evidence.

| (13) | The Commission at this stage therefore has sufficient evidence which tends to indicate that exports of GFR from Egypt are benefiting from countervailable subsidies. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

The Commission at this stage therefore has sufficient evidence which tends to indicate that exports of GFR from Egypt are benefiting from countervailable subsidies.

2.2.   Massive imports of GFR from Egypt in a relatively short period

Massive imports of GFR from Egypt in a relatively short period

| (14) | The extraction from the Surveillance 2 database, together with the 2015 data from the complaint, shows massive imports of Egyptian GFR from 2015 to 2018. Imports have increased in volume in this period by 200 % and their market share has increased from 4,6 % in 2015 to 12,8 % in 2018. |
| --- | --- |

(14)

The extraction from the Surveillance 2 database, together with the 2015 data from the complaint, shows massive imports of Egyptian GFR from 2015 to 2018. Imports have increased in volume in this period by 200 % and their market share has increased from 4,6 % in 2015 to 12,8 % in 2018.

| (15) | Having regard to more recent data, the graph below shows the quantity of GFR imported from Egypt per quarter from January 2016 to September 2019. This covers the period considered (Q1 2016 to Q1 2019) and two quarters after the investigation period (‘IP’) (Q2 and Q3 2019). |
| --- | --- |

(15)

Having regard to more recent data, the graph below shows the quantity of GFR imported from Egypt per quarter from January 2016 to September 2019. This covers the period considered (Q1 2016 to Q1 2019) and two quarters after the investigation period (‘IP’) (Q2 and Q3 2019).

| (16) | For the period considered there is a significant increase of 130 %, from just over 14 000 tonnes in Q1 2016 to 32 000 tonnes in Q1 2019, being an increase in market share from 5 % to 14 %: |
| --- | --- |

(16)

For the period considered there is a significant increase of 130 %, from just over 14 000 tonnes in Q1 2016 to 32 000 tonnes in Q1 2019, being an increase in market share from 5 % to 14 %:

Image 1

| (17) | Since the separate anti-dumping investigation mentioned in recital 3 concerns import of the same product from, among others, Egypt, such initiation may have already affected trade flows for the assessment at issue. Thus, the date of initiation of that case, namely 3 May 2019, will be considered as the beginning of the post-initiation period to assess the evolution of imports also in this investigation. |
| --- | --- |

(17)

Since the separate anti-dumping investigation mentioned in recital 3 concerns import of the same product from, among others, Egypt, such initiation may have already affected trade flows for the assessment at issue. Thus, the date of initiation of that case, namely 3 May 2019, will be considered as the beginning of the post-initiation period to assess the evolution of imports also in this investigation.

| (18) | An analysis of imports from Egypt during the post-initiation period does not suggest that massive imports have ceased, but rather that they remain at the same or a higher level:











  Import quantities from Egypt (tonnes) |
| --- | --- |
| | Monthly average (IP) | Post-initiation total (*1) | Same period in the IP total (*2) | Monthly average (post-initiation) | Difference
  Same period IP – post-initiation (total) | Difference
  Total IP – post-initiation (monthly average) |
| Egypt | 12 014 | 91 319 | 92 286 | 13 045 | -1 % | +9 % |
| Source: Surveillance 2 database |

(18)

An analysis of imports from Egypt during the post-initiation period does not suggest that massive imports have ceased, but rather that they remain at the same or a higher level:

Import quantities from Egypt (tonnes)

Monthly average (IP)

Post-initiation total (*1)

*1

Same period in the IP total (*2)

*2

Monthly average (post-initiation)

Difference

Same period IP – post-initiation (total)

Difference

Total IP – post-initiation (monthly average)

Egypt

12 014

91 319

92 286

13 045

-1 %

+9 %

Source: Surveillance 2 database

Source:

| (19) | Indeed, having regard to the investigation period and afterwards, the average volume of monthly imports between May and November 2019 is 9 % greater than that during the investigation period. |
| --- | --- |

(19)

Indeed, having regard to the investigation period and afterwards, the average volume of monthly imports between May and November 2019 is 9 % greater than that during the investigation period.

| (20) | The total quantity of GFR originating in Egypt imported into the Union between May and November 2019 is almost at the same level than the total quantity imported during the same period in 2018. |
| --- | --- |

(20)

The total quantity of GFR originating in Egypt imported into the Union between May and November 2019 is almost at the same level than the total quantity imported during the same period in 2018.

| (21) | Based on the analysis above, the Commission concluded that massive imports from Egypt have taken place. These quantities, together with the increase in market share throughout the period considered, amount to massive imports in a relatively short period within the meaning of Article 16(4) of the basic Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(21)

Based on the analysis above, the Commission concluded that massive imports from Egypt have taken place. These quantities, together with the increase in market share throughout the period considered, amount to massive imports in a relatively short period within the meaning of Article 16(4) of the basic Regulation.

| (22) | The increase in imports in fact coincided with the initiation of the anti-dumping investigation on the same product concerned, following a declining and a more stable import trend in the previous two quarters. This may be due to the possibility of the product concerned being subject to trade defence measures. |
| --- | --- |

(22)

The increase in imports in fact coincided with the initiation of the anti-dumping investigation on the same product concerned, following a declining and a more stable import trend in the previous two quarters. This may be due to the possibility of the product concerned being subject to trade defence measures.

2.3.   Critical circumstances and injury difficult to repair

Critical circumstances and injury difficult to repair

| (23) | The complaint contains sufficient evidence that the Union industry is suffering material injury caused by the imports from Egypt which is difficult to repair, and that these constitute critical circumstances. |
| --- | --- |

(23)

The complaint contains sufficient evidence that the Union industry is suffering material injury caused by the imports from Egypt which is difficult to repair, and that these constitute critical circumstances.

| (24) | Imports from Jushi Egypt to the EU have increased substantially since 2015, when the Commission considered that the Union industry was not injured (4). |
| --- | --- |

(24)

Imports from Jushi Egypt to the EU have increased substantially since 2015, when the Commission considered that the Union industry was not injured (4).

4

| (25) | The Commission has sufficient evidence that the exporting producers’ subsidisation is causing material injury to the Union industry, which is difficult to repair. This evidence consists of detailed data, contained in the complaint, concerning the key injury factors set out in Article 8(4) of the basic Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(25)

The Commission has sufficient evidence that the exporting producers’ subsidisation is causing material injury to the Union industry, which is difficult to repair. This evidence consists of detailed data, contained in the complaint, concerning the key injury factors set out in Article 8(4) of the basic Regulation.

| (26) | Evidence of such circumstances includes the rapid deterioration of the situation of the Union industry characterised by a decline in profit from a peak of 13 % in 2016 down to 4,6 % in 2018 as well as a loss of market share of 11 percentage points during the same period (2016-2018). |
| --- | --- |

(26)

Evidence of such circumstances includes the rapid deterioration of the situation of the Union industry characterised by a decline in profit from a peak of 13 % in 2016 down to 4,6 % in 2018 as well as a loss of market share of 11 percentage points during the same period (2016-2018).

| (27) | This deterioration coincided with the increased volume of imports from Egypt shown in the graph above and a decrease of their average import price as described below. |
| --- | --- |

(27)

This deterioration coincided with the increased volume of imports from Egypt shown in the graph above and a decrease of their average import price as described below.

| (28) | The Commission found that the average unit price of GFR from Egypt has dropped from 1 007 EUR/tonne in Q1 2016 to 904 EUR/tonne in the IP. After the initiation of the anti-dumping investigation on the same product from Egypt, between May 2019 and November 2019, the unit price continued to fall, to an average of 884 EUR/tonne. |
| --- | --- |

(28)

The Commission found that the average unit price of GFR from Egypt has dropped from 1 007 EUR/tonne in Q1 2016 to 904 EUR/tonne in the IP. After the initiation of the anti-dumping investigation on the same product from Egypt, between May 2019 and November 2019, the unit price continued to fall, to an average of 884 EUR/tonne.

| (29) | By 2018 imports from Egypt were significantly undercutting Union industry’s prices by 16 % according to the complaint. |
| --- | --- |

(29)

By 2018 imports from Egypt were significantly undercutting Union industry’s prices by 16 % according to the complaint.

| (30) | In addition, the Commission assessed whether the injury suffered was difficult to repair. Considering that some users of GFR use lengthy processes to certify their suppliers, once they switch to a Chinese or Egyptian supplier it is unlikely for them to switch back to a Union producer in the short or even medium term. Such threat of permanent loss of market share or reduced income constitutes an injury which is difficult to repair. |
| --- | --- |

(30)

In addition, the Commission assessed whether the injury suffered was difficult to repair. Considering that some users of GFR use lengthy processes to certify their suppliers, once they switch to a Chinese or Egyptian supplier it is unlikely for them to switch back to a Union producer in the short or even medium term. Such threat of permanent loss of market share or reduced income constitutes an injury which is difficult to repair.

| (31) | The Commission therefore concluded that the evidence at hand shows that the Union industry is suffering injury that is difficult to repair and that circumstances are critical. |
| --- | --- |

(31)

The Commission therefore concluded that the evidence at hand shows that the Union industry is suffering injury that is difficult to repair and that circumstances are critical.

2.4.   Preclusion of recurrence of injury

Preclusion of recurrence of injury

| (32) | Finally, given the considerations laid down in Section 2.3 above, the Commission deemed it necessary to prepare for the potential retroactive imposition of measures by imposing registration, in order to preclude the recurrence of such injury. Indeed, the post-IP market conditions tend to confirm that the situation of the domestic industry is deteriorating due to the significant increase of subsidised imports at low prices. |
| --- | --- |

(32)

Finally, given the considerations laid down in Section 2.3 above, the Commission deemed it necessary to prepare for the potential retroactive imposition of measures by imposing registration, in order to preclude the recurrence of such injury. Indeed, the post-IP market conditions tend to confirm that the situation of the domestic industry is deteriorating due to the significant increase of subsidised imports at low prices.

2.5.   Conclusion

Conclusion

| (33) | In light of the above, the Commission found that there is no conclusive evidence showing that the registration of imports of the product concerned during the period of the pre-disclosure is not merited in this case. |
| --- | --- |

(33)

In light of the above, the Commission found that there is no conclusive evidence showing that the registration of imports of the product concerned during the period of the pre-disclosure is not merited in this case.

| (34) | Thus in accordance with Article 24(5a) of the basic Regulation, the Commission will register imports of the product concerned during the period of pre-disclosure. |
| --- | --- |

(34)

Thus in accordance with Article 24(5a) of the basic Regulation, the Commission will register imports of the product concerned during the period of pre-disclosure.

3.   Future liability for the registered imports

Future liability for the registered imports

| (35) | Under Article 24(5a) of the basic Regulation, imports of the product concerned must be made subject to registration during the period of pre-disclosure pursuant Article 29a of the basic Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(35)

Under Article 24(5a) of the basic Regulation, imports of the product concerned must be made subject to registration during the period of pre-disclosure pursuant Article 29a of the basic Regulation.

| (36) | Any future liability would emanate from the definitive findings of this anti-subsidy investigation. At this stage of the investigation it is not yet possible to estimate the amount of subsidisation in Egypt. The complaint does not provide for an accurate estimation of the amount of subsidisation, which should normally be used as the basis to establish the countervailing duties. The complaint only contains an estimation of the injury elimination level for 2018 of 22 %. |
| --- | --- |

(36)

Any future liability would emanate from the definitive findings of this anti-subsidy investigation. At this stage of the investigation it is not yet possible to estimate the amount of subsidisation in Egypt. The complaint does not provide for an accurate estimation of the amount of subsidisation, which should normally be used as the basis to establish the countervailing duties. The complaint only contains an estimation of the injury elimination level for 2018 of 22 %.

| (37) | In accordance with Article 15(1), fourth paragraph of the basic Regulation this estimated amount of liability would only be relevant if a duty based on the amount of countervailable subsidies would be higher and the Commission clearly concludes that it is not in the Union’s interest to impose this higher duty. |
| --- | --- |

(37)

In accordance with Article 15(1), fourth paragraph of the basic Regulation this estimated amount of liability would only be relevant if a duty based on the amount of countervailable subsidies would be higher and the Commission clearly concludes that it is not in the Union’s interest to impose this higher duty.

4.   Processing of personal data

Processing of personal data

| (38) | Any personal data collected in the context of this registration will be treated in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council (5), |
| --- | --- |

(38)

Any personal data collected in the context of this registration will be treated in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council (5),

5

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.   The customs authorities are hereby directed, under Article 24(5a) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037, to take the appropriate steps to register imports into the Union of chopped glass fibre strands, of a length of not more than 50 mm; glass fibre rovings, excluding glass fibre rovings which are impregnated and coated and have a loss on ignition of more than 3 % (as determined by the ISO Standard 1887); and mats made of glass fibre filaments excluding mats of glass wool, currently falling under CN codes 7019 11 00, ex 7019 12 00, 7019 31 00 (TARIC codes 7019120022, 7019120025, 7019120026 and 7019120039) and originating in Egypt.

2.   Registration shall expire three weeks following the date of entry into force of this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 February 2020.

For the Commission

The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 55.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 192, 7.6.2019, p. 30.

2

(3)  Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of continuous filament glass fibre products originating in Bahrain and Egypt (OJ C 151, 3.5.2019, p. 4).

3

(*1)  May to November 2019.

*1

(*2)  May to November 2018.

*2

(4)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/724 of 24 April 2017 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain continuous filament glass fibre products originating in the People's Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 107, 25.4.2017, p. 4).

4

(5)  Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39).

5

---

DECISIONS

| 14.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 42/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 42/15

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION (CFSP) 2020/200

of 11 February 2020

on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia (EUMM Georgia) and repealing Decision (CFSP) 2018/2075 (EUMM Georgia/1/2020)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2010/452/CFSP of 12 August 2010 on the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia, EUMM Georgia (1), and in particular Article 10(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 10 of Decision 2010/452/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) is authorised, in accordance with the third paragraph of Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising political control and strategic direction of the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia (EUMM Georgia), including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 10 of Decision 2010/452/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) is authorised, in accordance with the third paragraph of Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising political control and strategic direction of the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia (EUMM Georgia), including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.

| (2) | On 3 December 2018 the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2018/1884 (2), extending the mandate of EUMM Georgia until 14 December 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 3 December 2018 the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2018/1884 (2), extending the mandate of EUMM Georgia until 14 December 2020.

| (3) | On 7 December 2018 the PSC adopted Decision (CFSP) 2018/2075 (3), extending the mandate of Mr Erik HØEG as Head of EUMM Georgia from 15 December 2018 to 14 December 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On 7 December 2018 the PSC adopted Decision (CFSP) 2018/2075 (3), extending the mandate of Mr Erik HØEG as Head of EUMM Georgia from 15 December 2018 to 14 December 2020.

| (4) | On 17 January 2020 the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy proposed the appointment of Mr Marek SZCZYGIEL as Head of EUMM Georgia until 14 December 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

On 17 January 2020 the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy proposed the appointment of Mr Marek SZCZYGIEL as Head of EUMM Georgia until 14 December 2020.

| (5) | Decision (CFSP) 2018/2075 should therefore be repealed, |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Decision (CFSP) 2018/2075 should therefore be repealed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Marek SZCZYGIEL is hereby appointed as Head of Mission of the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia (EUMM Georgia) from 15 March 2020 to 14 December 2020.

Article 2

Decision (CFSP) 2018/2075 is hereby repealed.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

It shall apply as from 15 March 2020.

Done at Brussels, 11 February 2020.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

S. FROM-EMMESBERGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 213, 13.8.2010, p. 43.

1

(2)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/1884 of 3 December 2018 extending and amending Decision 2010/452/CFSP on the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia, EUMM Georgia (OJ L 308, 4.12.2018, p. 41).

2

(3)  Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2018/2075 of 7 December 2018 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia (EUMM Georgia) (EUMM GEORGIA/1/2018) (OJ L 331, 28.12.2018, p. 217).

3

---

| 14.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 42/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 42/17

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2020/201

of 12 February 2020

excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural development (EAFRD)

(notified under document C(2020) 541)

(Only the Czech, Danish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Spanish and Swedish texts are authentic)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008 (1), and in particular Article 52 thereof,

After consulting the Committee on the Agricultural Funds,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 52 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 the Commission is to carry out the necessary verifications, communicate to the Member States the results of those verifications, take note of the comments of the Member States, initiate a bilateral discussion so that an agreement may be reached with the Member States in question, and formally communicate its conclusions to them. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 52 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 the Commission is to carry out the necessary verifications, communicate to the Member States the results of those verifications, take note of the comments of the Member States, initiate a bilateral discussion so that an agreement may be reached with the Member States in question, and formally communicate its conclusions to them.

| (2) | The Member States have had an opportunity to request the launch of a conciliation procedure. That opportunity has been used in some cases and the reports issued on the outcome have been examined by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Member States have had an opportunity to request the launch of a conciliation procedure. That opportunity has been used in some cases and the reports issued on the outcome have been examined by the Commission.

| (3) | In accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013, only agricultural expenditure which has been incurred in a way that has not infringed Union law may be financed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013, only agricultural expenditure which has been incurred in a way that has not infringed Union law may be financed.

| (4) | In the light of the verifications carried out, the outcome of the bilateral discussions and the conciliation procedures, part of the expenditure declared by the Member States does not fulfil this requirement and cannot, therefore, be financed under the EAGF and the EAFRD. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

In the light of the verifications carried out, the outcome of the bilateral discussions and the conciliation procedures, part of the expenditure declared by the Member States does not fulfil this requirement and cannot, therefore, be financed under the EAGF and the EAFRD.

| (5) | The amounts that are not recognised as being chargeable to the EAGF and the EAFRD should be indicated. Those amounts do not relate to expenditure incurred more than twenty-four months before the Commission’s written notification of the results of the verifications to the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The amounts that are not recognised as being chargeable to the EAGF and the EAFRD should be indicated. Those amounts do not relate to expenditure incurred more than twenty-four months before the Commission’s written notification of the results of the verifications to the Member States.

| (6) | The amounts excluded from Union financing by the present Decision should also take into account any reductions or suspensions in accordance with Article 41 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 due to the fact that such reductions or suspensions are of a provisional nature and without prejudice to decisions taken pursuant to Articles 51 or 52 of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

The amounts excluded from Union financing by the present Decision should also take into account any reductions or suspensions in accordance with Article 41 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 due to the fact that such reductions or suspensions are of a provisional nature and without prejudice to decisions taken pursuant to Articles 51 or 52 of that Regulation.

| (7) | As regards the cases covered by this decision, the assessment of the amounts to be excluded on grounds of non-compliance with Union law was notified by the Commission to the Member States in a summary report on the subject (2). |
| --- | --- |

(7)

As regards the cases covered by this decision, the assessment of the amounts to be excluded on grounds of non-compliance with Union law was notified by the Commission to the Member States in a summary report on the subject (2).

| (8) | This Decision is without prejudice to any financial conclusions that the Commission may draw from the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union in cases pending on 30 November 2019, |
| --- | --- |

(8)

This Decision is without prejudice to any financial conclusions that the Commission may draw from the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union in cases pending on 30 November 2019,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The amounts set out in the Annex and related to expenditure incurred by the Member States’ accredited paying agencies and declared under the EAGF or the EAFRD shall be excluded from Union financing.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, Hungary, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic and the Kingdom of Sweden.

Done at Brussels, 12 February 2020.

For the Commission

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 549.

1

(2)  Ares(2020)392485

2

---

ANNEX

Decision: 62

Budget Item: 0 5 0 2 0 8 1 1

| Member State | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| PL | Fruit and Vegetables - Pre-recognised Producer Groups | 2017 | Lifting of suspension of monthly payments made to Poland (EAGF) - Commission Decision C(2016)2050 of 7 April 2016 and Commission Decision C(2017)2104 of 4 April 2017 - Period from 16 October 2016 to 15 October 2017 | ONE OFF | | EUR | 0,00 | - 3 007 191,14 | 3 007 191,14 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables - Pre-recognised Producer Groups | 2016 | Lifting of suspension of monthly payments made to Poland (EAGF) - Commission Decision C(2016)2050 of 7 April 2016 - Period from 1 March 2016 to 15 October 2016 | ONE OFF | | EUR | 0,00 | - 9 356 312,09 | 9 356 312,09 |
| | | | | | Total PL: | EUR | 0,00 | - 12 363 503,23 | 12 363 503,23 |
| | | | | | | | | | |

Member State

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

PL

Fruit and Vegetables - Pre-recognised Producer Groups

2017

Lifting of suspension of monthly payments made to Poland (EAGF) - Commission Decision C(2016)2050 of 7 April 2016 and Commission Decision C(2017)2104 of 4 April 2017 - Period from 16 October 2016 to 15 October 2017

ONE OFF

EUR

0,00

- 3 007 191,14

3 007 191,14

Fruit and Vegetables - Pre-recognised Producer Groups

2016

Lifting of suspension of monthly payments made to Poland (EAGF) - Commission Decision C(2016)2050 of 7 April 2016 - Period from 1 March 2016 to 15 October 2016

ONE OFF

EUR

0,00

- 9 356 312,09

9 356 312,09

Total PL:

EUR

0,00

- 12 363 503,23

12 363 503,23

| Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| EUR | 0,00 | - 12 363 503,23 | 12 363 503,23 |

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

EUR

0,00

- 12 363 503,23

12 363 503,23

Budget Item: 0 5 0 3 0 1 0 7

| Member State | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FR | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2016 | Lifting of suspension of monthly payments made to France (EAGF) - Commission Decision C(2016)4287 du 12 juillet 2016 | ONE OFF | | EUR | 0,00 | - 10 499 112,70 | 10 499 112,70 |
| | | | | | Total FR: | EUR | 0,00 | - 10 499 112,70 | 10 499 112,70 |

Member State

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

FR

Decoupled Direct Aids

2016

Lifting of suspension of monthly payments made to France (EAGF) - Commission Decision C(2016)4287 du 12 juillet 2016

ONE OFF

EUR

0,00

- 10 499 112,70

10 499 112,70

Total FR:

EUR

0,00

- 10 499 112,70

10 499 112,70

| Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| EUR | 0,00 | - 10 499 112,70 | 10 499 112,70 |

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

EUR

0,00

- 10 499 112,70

10 499 112,70

Budget Item: 0 5 0 3 0 1 1 0

| Member State | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FR | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2016 | Lifting of suspension of monthly payments made to France (EAGF) - Commission Decision C(2016)4287 du 12 juillet 2016 | ONE OFF | | EUR | 0,00 | - 101 753 593,01 | 101 753 593,01 |
| | | | | | Total FR: | EUR | 0,00 | - 101 753 593,01 | 101 753 593,01 |

Member State

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

FR

Decoupled Direct Aids

2016

Lifting of suspension of monthly payments made to France (EAGF) - Commission Decision C(2016)4287 du 12 juillet 2016

ONE OFF

EUR

0,00

- 101 753 593,01

101 753 593,01

Total FR:

EUR

0,00

- 101 753 593,01

101 753 593,01

| Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| EUR | 0,00 | - 101 753 593,01 | 101 753 593,01 |

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

EUR

0,00

- 101 753 593,01

101 753 593,01

Budget Item: 0 5 0 3 0 1 1 1

| Member State | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FR | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2016 | Lifting of suspension of monthly payments made to France (EAGF) - Commission Decision C(2016)4287 du 12 juillet 2016 | ONE OFF | | EUR | 0,00 | - 61 833 996,81 | 61 833 996,81 |
| | | | | | Total FR: | EUR | 0,00 | - 61 833 996,81 | 61 833 996,81 |

Member State

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

FR

Decoupled Direct Aids

2016

Lifting of suspension of monthly payments made to France (EAGF) - Commission Decision C(2016)4287 du 12 juillet 2016

ONE OFF

EUR

0,00

- 61 833 996,81

61 833 996,81

Total FR:

EUR

0,00

- 61 833 996,81

61 833 996,81

| Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| EUR | 0,00 | - 61 833 996,81 | 61 833 996,81 |

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

EUR

0,00

- 61 833 996,81

61 833 996,81

Budget Item: 0 5 0 3 0 1 1 3

| Member State | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FR | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2016 | Lifting of suspension of monthly payments made to France (EAGF) - Commission Decision C(2016)4287 du 12 juillet 2016 | ONE OFF | | EUR | 0,00 | - 1 316 652,56 | 1 316 652,56 |
| | | | | | Total FR: | EUR | 0,00 | - 1 316 652,56 | 1 316 652,56 |

Member State

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

FR

Decoupled Direct Aids

2016

Lifting of suspension of monthly payments made to France (EAGF) - Commission Decision C(2016)4287 du 12 juillet 2016

ONE OFF

EUR

0,00

- 1 316 652,56

1 316 652,56

Total FR:

EUR

0,00

- 1 316 652,56

1 316 652,56

| Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| EUR | 0,00 | - 1 316 652,56 | 1 316 652,56 |

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

EUR

0,00

- 1 316 652,56

1 316 652,56

Budget Item: 6 7 0 1

| Member State | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AT | Clearance of Accounts - Financial Clearance | 2018 | Errors in EAGF and EAFRD population | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 411 336,74 | 0,00 | - 411 336,74 |
| | | | | | Total AT: | EUR | - 411 336,74 | 0,00 | - 411 336,74 |
| CZ | Fruit and Vegetables - Operational programmes incl withdrawals | 2016 | one off correction to unduly recognized POs FY 2016 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 1 336 232,52 | 0,00 | - 1 336 232,52 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables - Operational programmes incl withdrawals | 2017 | one off to unduly recognized POs FY 2017 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 1 566 325,02 | 0,00 | - 1 566 325,02 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables - Operational programmes incl withdrawals | 2018 | one off to unduly recognized POs FY 2018 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 34 770,46 | 0,00 | - 34 770,46 |
| | | | | | Total CZ: | EUR | - 2 937 328,00 | 0,00 | - 2 937 328,00 |
| DE | Fruit and Vegetables - Operational programmes incl withdrawals | 2015 | Deficiencies in the control of the Value of Marketed Production OP 2014 | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 100 404,77 | 0,00 | - 100 404,77 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables - Operational programmes incl withdrawals | 2016 | Deficiencies in the control of the Value of Marketed Production OP 2015 | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 85 635,62 | 0,00 | - 85 635,62 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables - Operational programmes incl withdrawals | 2017 | Deficiencies in the control of the Value of Marketed Production OP 2016 | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 76 662,25 | 0,00 | - 76 662,25 |
| | | | | | Total DE: | EUR | - 262 702,64 | 0,00 | - 262 702,64 |
| DK | Certification | 2017 | Nominal amount of errors found during the substantive testing of EAGF | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 10 129,49 | 0,00 | - 10 129,49 |
| | | | | | Total DK: | EUR | - 10 129,49 | 0,00 | - 10 129,49 |
| ES | Cross-compliance | 2016 | CY 2015 | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 169 794,89 | - 13 977,99 | - 155 816,90 |
| | Cross-compliance | 2017 | CY 2015 | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 957,97 | 0,00 | - 957,97 |
| | Cross-compliance | 2018 | CY 2015 | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 250,07 | 0,00 | - 250,07 |
| | Cross-compliance | 2017 | CY 2016 | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 269 132,59 | - 18 054,67 | - 251 077,92 |
| | Cross-compliance | 2018 | CY 2016 | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 95,10 | 0,00 | - 95,10 |
| | Cross-compliance | 2018 | CY 2017 | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 299 854,12 | 0,00 | - 299 854,12 |
| | | | | | Total ES: | EUR | - 740 084,74 | - 32 032,66 | -708 052,08 |
| FR | Certification | 2017 | Errors linked to recoveries - FY2017 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 63 689,58 | 0,00 | - 63 689,58 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2016 | Weaknesses OTSC - affecting greening. In relation to the suspension of monthly payments (Commission Decision C(2016) 4287 of 12 July 2016) | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 729 462,41 | - 693,01 | - 728 769,40 |
| | Voluntary Coupled Support Area Based | 2016 | Weaknesses OTSC - VCS - Area based | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 237 100,13 | - 225,25 | - 236 874,88 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2016 | Weakness in SIPA-RPG. In relation to the suspension of monthly payments (Commission Decision C(2016) 4287 of 12 July 2016) | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 39 267 880,66 | - 35 071,94 | - 39 232 808,72 |
| | | | | | Total FR: | EUR | - 40 298 132,78 | - 35 990,20 | - 40 262 142,58 |
| PL | Fruit and Vegetables - Pre-recognised Producer Groups | 2016 | FY 2016 Deficiencies in the control system of aid to Producer Groups in the Fruit and vegetables sector. In relation to the suspension of monthly payments (Commission Decision C(2016) 2050 of 7 April 2016) | FLAT RATE | 15,00% | EUR | - 9 176 945,14 | 0,00 | - 9 176 945,14 |
| | Fruit and Vegetables - Pre-recognised Producer Groups | 2017 | FY 2017 Deficiencies in the control system of aid to Producer Groups in the Fruit and vegetables sector. In relation to the suspension of monthly payments (Commission Decisions C(2016) 2050 of 7 April 2016 and C(2017) 2104 of 4 April 2017) | FLAT RATE | 10,00% | EUR | - 1 202 876,46 | - 67 115,12 | - 1 135 761,34 |
| | Clearance of Accounts - Financial Clearance | 2016 | Reduction in payments - payment deadlines - R.1306/13, Art.40; R.907/14, Art.5 - 2016 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 361 842,05 | 0,00 | - 361 842,05 |
| | | | | | Total PL: | EUR | - 10 741 663,65 | - 67 115,12 | - 10 674 548,53 |
| PT | Entitlements | 2016 | 2.1 Active farmer provision_CY2015 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 10 209,04 | - 195,19 | - 10 013,85 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2016 | 2.1 Active farmer provision_impact greening_CY2015 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 6 274,86 | - 65,71 | - 6 209,15 |
| | Other Direct Aid - Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009 | 2015 | 2.2 Performance of OTSC's in the number required_CY2014 | FLAT RATE | 3,00% | EUR | - 147 181,68 | - 936,58 | - 146 245,10 |
| | Other Direct Aid - Bovines | 2015 | 2.3 Non-application of sanction in case of late notification_CY2014 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 69 563,00 | - 347,82 | - 69 215,18 |
| | Voluntary Coupled Support | 2016 | 2.3 Non-application of sanction in case of late notification_CY2015 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 466 412,00 | - 2 332,06 | - 464 079,94 |
| | Voluntary Coupled Support | 2017 | 2.3 Non-application of sanction in case of late notification_CY2016 (M1) | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 487 776,00 | 0,00 | - 487 776,00 |
| | Voluntary Coupled Support | 2017 | 2.3 Non-application of sanction in case of late notification_CY2016 (M3) | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 102 997,00 | 0,00 | - 102 997,00 |
| | Entitlements | 2016 | 2.4.1 Correct allocation to young farmers and farmers commencing their agricultural activity_CY2015 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 463 133,49 | - 8 854,97 | - 454 278,52 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2016 | 2.4.1 Correct allocation to young farmers and farmers commencing their agricultural activity_Greening impact_CY2015 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 285 323,92 | - 2 987,92 | - 282 336,00 |
| | Entitlements | 2016 | 2.4.2 Correct allocation to farmers to prevent land from being abandoned_BPS_CY2015 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 84 178,23 | - 1 609,46 | - 82 568,77 |
| | Entitlements | 2017 | 2.4.2 Correct allocation to farmers to prevent land from being abandoned_BPS_CY2016 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 91 716,92 | 0,00 | - 91 716,92 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2016 | 2.4.2 Correct allocation to farmers to prevent land from being abandoned_Greening CY2015 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 53 777,14 | - 563,16 | - 53 213,98 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2017 | 2.4.2 Correct allocation to farmers to prevent land from being abandoned_Greening CY2016 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 58 591,73 | 0,00 | - 58 591,73 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2016 | 2.4.2 Correct allocation to farmers to prevent land from being abandoned_SFS_CY2015 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 127 201,18 | 0,00 | - 127 201,18 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2017 | 2.4.2 Correct allocation to farmers to prevent land from being abandoned_SFS_CY2016 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 98 325,00 | 0,00 | - 98 325,00 |
| | | | | | Total PT: | EUR | - 2 552 661,19 | - 17 892,87 | - 2 534 768,32 |
| SE | Cross- compliance | 2016 | Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2015 | FLAT RATE | 10,00% | EUR | - 6 612 878,79 | 0,00 | - 6 612 878,79 |
| | Cross-compliance | 2017 | Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2015 | FLAT RATE | 10,00% | EUR | - 27 446,29 | 0,00 | - 27 446,29 |
| | Cross-compliance | 2018 | Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2015 | FLAT RATE | 10,00% | EUR | - 5 821,85 | 0,00 | - 5 821,85 |
| | Cross-compliance | 2017 | Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2016 | FLAT RATE | 10,00% | EUR | - 6 751 087,48 | 0,00 | - 6 751 087,48 |
| | Cross-compliance | 2018 | Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2016 | FLAT RATE | 10,00% | EUR | - 104 438,34 | 0,00 | - 104 438,34 |
| | Cross-compliance | 2018 | Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2017 | FLAT RATE | 10,00% | EUR | - 6 668 962,54 | 0,00 | - 6 668 962,54 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2012 | Weakness in the RA - RS 2011 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 992 723,60 | - 1 330,29 | - 991 393,31 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2013 | Weakness in the RA - RS 2012 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 2 189 695,95 | 0,00 | - 2 189 695,95 |
| | Decoupled Direct Aids | 2014 | Weakness in the RA - RS 2013 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 1 705 908,80 | 0,00 | - 1 705 908,80 |
| | | | | | Total SE: | EUR | - 25 058 963,64 | - 1 330,29 | - 25 057 633,35 |
| | | | | | | | | | |

Member State

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

AT

Clearance of Accounts - Financial Clearance

2018

Errors in EAGF and EAFRD population

ONE OFF

EUR

- 411 336,74

0,00

- 411 336,74

Total AT:

EUR

- 411 336,74

0,00

- 411 336,74

CZ

Fruit and Vegetables - Operational programmes incl withdrawals

2016

one off correction to unduly recognized POs FY 2016

ONE OFF

EUR

- 1 336 232,52

0,00

- 1 336 232,52

Fruit and Vegetables - Operational programmes incl withdrawals

2017

one off to unduly recognized POs FY 2017

ONE OFF

EUR

- 1 566 325,02

0,00

- 1 566 325,02

Fruit and Vegetables - Operational programmes incl withdrawals

2018

one off to unduly recognized POs FY 2018

ONE OFF

EUR

- 34 770,46

0,00

- 34 770,46

Total CZ:

EUR

- 2 937 328,00

0,00

- 2 937 328,00

DE

Fruit and Vegetables - Operational programmes incl withdrawals

2015

Deficiencies in the control of the Value of Marketed Production OP 2014

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 100 404,77

0,00

- 100 404,77

Fruit and Vegetables - Operational programmes incl withdrawals

2016

Deficiencies in the control of the Value of Marketed Production OP 2015

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 85 635,62

0,00

- 85 635,62

Fruit and Vegetables - Operational programmes incl withdrawals

2017

Deficiencies in the control of the Value of Marketed Production OP 2016

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 76 662,25

0,00

- 76 662,25

Total DE:

EUR

- 262 702,64

0,00

- 262 702,64

DK

Certification

2017

Nominal amount of errors found during the substantive testing of EAGF

ONE OFF

EUR

- 10 129,49

0,00

- 10 129,49

Total DK:

EUR

- 10 129,49

0,00

- 10 129,49

ES

Cross-compliance

2016

CY 2015

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 169 794,89

- 13 977,99

- 155 816,90

Cross-compliance

2017

CY 2015

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 957,97

0,00

- 957,97

Cross-compliance

2018

CY 2015

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 250,07

0,00

- 250,07

Cross-compliance

2017

CY 2016

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 269 132,59

- 18 054,67

- 251 077,92

Cross-compliance

2018

CY 2016

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 95,10

0,00

- 95,10

Cross-compliance

2018

CY 2017

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 299 854,12

0,00

- 299 854,12

Total ES:

EUR

- 740 084,74

- 32 032,66

-708 052,08

FR

Certification

2017

Errors linked to recoveries - FY2017

ONE OFF

EUR

- 63 689,58

0,00

- 63 689,58

Decoupled Direct Aids

2016

Weaknesses OTSC - affecting greening. In relation to the suspension of monthly payments (Commission Decision C(2016) 4287 of 12 July 2016)

ONE OFF

EUR

- 729 462,41

- 693,01

- 728 769,40

Voluntary Coupled Support Area Based

2016

Weaknesses OTSC - VCS - Area based

ONE OFF

EUR

- 237 100,13

- 225,25

- 236 874,88

Decoupled Direct Aids

2016

Weakness in SIPA-RPG. In relation to the suspension of monthly payments (Commission Decision C(2016) 4287 of 12 July 2016)

ONE OFF

EUR

- 39 267 880,66

- 35 071,94

- 39 232 808,72

Total FR:

EUR

- 40 298 132,78

- 35 990,20

- 40 262 142,58

PL

Fruit and Vegetables - Pre-recognised Producer Groups

2016

FY 2016 Deficiencies in the control system of aid to Producer Groups in the Fruit and vegetables sector. In relation to the suspension of monthly payments (Commission Decision C(2016) 2050 of 7 April 2016)

FLAT RATE

15,00%

EUR

- 9 176 945,14

0,00

- 9 176 945,14

Fruit and Vegetables - Pre-recognised Producer Groups

2017

FY 2017 Deficiencies in the control system of aid to Producer Groups in the Fruit and vegetables sector. In relation to the suspension of monthly payments (Commission Decisions C(2016) 2050 of 7 April 2016 and C(2017) 2104 of 4 April 2017)

FLAT RATE

10,00%

EUR

- 1 202 876,46

- 67 115,12

- 1 135 761,34

Clearance of Accounts - Financial Clearance

2016

Reduction in payments - payment deadlines - R.1306/13, Art.40; R.907/14, Art.5 - 2016

ONE OFF

EUR

- 361 842,05

0,00

- 361 842,05

Total PL:

EUR

- 10 741 663,65

- 67 115,12

- 10 674 548,53

PT

Entitlements

2016

2.1 Active farmer provision_CY2015

ONE OFF

EUR

- 10 209,04

- 195,19

- 10 013,85

Decoupled Direct Aids

2016

2.1 Active farmer provision_impact greening_CY2015

ONE OFF

EUR

- 6 274,86

- 65,71

- 6 209,15

Other Direct Aid - Article 68-72 of Reg.73/2009

2015

2.2 Performance of OTSC's in the number required_CY2014

FLAT RATE

3,00%

EUR

- 147 181,68

- 936,58

- 146 245,10

Other Direct Aid - Bovines

2015

2.3 Non-application of sanction in case of late notification_CY2014

ONE OFF

EUR

- 69 563,00

- 347,82

- 69 215,18

Voluntary Coupled Support

2016

2.3 Non-application of sanction in case of late notification_CY2015

ONE OFF

EUR

- 466 412,00

- 2 332,06

- 464 079,94

Voluntary Coupled Support

2017

2.3 Non-application of sanction in case of late notification_CY2016 (M1)

ONE OFF

EUR

- 487 776,00

0,00

- 487 776,00

Voluntary Coupled Support

2017

2.3 Non-application of sanction in case of late notification_CY2016 (M3)

ONE OFF

EUR

- 102 997,00

0,00

- 102 997,00

Entitlements

2016

2.4.1 Correct allocation to young farmers and farmers commencing their agricultural activity_CY2015

ONE OFF

EUR

- 463 133,49

- 8 854,97

- 454 278,52

Decoupled Direct Aids

2016

2.4.1 Correct allocation to young farmers and farmers commencing their agricultural activity_Greening impact_CY2015

ONE OFF

EUR

- 285 323,92

- 2 987,92

- 282 336,00

Entitlements

2016

2.4.2 Correct allocation to farmers to prevent land from being abandoned_BPS_CY2015

ONE OFF

EUR

- 84 178,23

- 1 609,46

- 82 568,77

Entitlements

2017

2.4.2 Correct allocation to farmers to prevent land from being abandoned_BPS_CY2016

ONE OFF

EUR

- 91 716,92

0,00

- 91 716,92

Decoupled Direct Aids

2016

2.4.2 Correct allocation to farmers to prevent land from being abandoned_Greening CY2015

ONE OFF

EUR

- 53 777,14

- 563,16

- 53 213,98

Decoupled Direct Aids

2017

2.4.2 Correct allocation to farmers to prevent land from being abandoned_Greening CY2016

ONE OFF

EUR

- 58 591,73

0,00

- 58 591,73

Decoupled Direct Aids

2016

2.4.2 Correct allocation to farmers to prevent land from being abandoned_SFS_CY2015

ONE OFF

EUR

- 127 201,18

0,00

- 127 201,18

Decoupled Direct Aids

2017

2.4.2 Correct allocation to farmers to prevent land from being abandoned_SFS_CY2016

ONE OFF

EUR

- 98 325,00

0,00

- 98 325,00

Total PT:

EUR

- 2 552 661,19

- 17 892,87

- 2 534 768,32

SE

Cross- compliance

2016

Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2015

FLAT RATE

10,00%

EUR

- 6 612 878,79

0,00

- 6 612 878,79

Cross-compliance

2017

Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2015

FLAT RATE

10,00%

EUR

- 27 446,29

0,00

- 27 446,29

Cross-compliance

2018

Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2015

FLAT RATE

10,00%

EUR

- 5 821,85

0,00

- 5 821,85

Cross-compliance

2017

Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2016

FLAT RATE

10,00%

EUR

- 6 751 087,48

0,00

- 6 751 087,48

Cross-compliance

2018

Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2016

FLAT RATE

10,00%

EUR

- 104 438,34

0,00

- 104 438,34

Cross-compliance

2018

Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2017

FLAT RATE

10,00%

EUR

- 6 668 962,54

0,00

- 6 668 962,54

Decoupled Direct Aids

2012

Weakness in the RA - RS 2011

ONE OFF

EUR

- 992 723,60

- 1 330,29

- 991 393,31

Decoupled Direct Aids

2013

Weakness in the RA - RS 2012

ONE OFF

EUR

- 2 189 695,95

0,00

- 2 189 695,95

Decoupled Direct Aids

2014

Weakness in the RA - RS 2013

ONE OFF

EUR

- 1 705 908,80

0,00

- 1 705 908,80

Total SE:

EUR

- 25 058 963,64

- 1 330,29

- 25 057 633,35

| Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| EUR | - 83 013 002,87 | - 154 361,14 | - 82 858 641,73 |

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

EUR

- 83 013 002,87

- 154 361,14

- 82 858 641,73

Budget Item: 6 7 1 1

| Member State | Measure | FY | Reason | Type | Correction % | Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AT | Clearance of Accounts - Financial Clearance | 2018 | Errors in EAGF and EAFRD population | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 128,52 | 0,00 | - 128,52 |
| | | | | | Total AT: | EUR | - 128,52 | 0,00 | - 128,52 |
| DE | Rural Development EAFRD Risk management | 2016 | deficiency in key control - eligibility of expenditure | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 600 000,00 | 0,00 | - 600 000,00 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Risk management | 2017 | deficiency in key control - eligibility of expenditure | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 500 000,00 | 0,00 | - 500 000,00 |
| | Clearance of Accounts - Financial Clearance | 2018 | Random errors in EAFRD non-IACS population | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 81 017,97 | 0,00 | - 81 017,97 |
| | | | | | Total DE: | EUR | - 1 181 017,97 | 0,00 | - 1 181 017,97 |
| DK | Certification | 2017 | Difference between MLE calculated by Danish authorities on 15/02 report and MLE calculated by DGAGRI | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 19 987,77 | 0,00 | - 19 987,77 |
| | Certification | 2017 | Extrapolated error from reasonableness of costs additional testing | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 116 031,99 | 0,00 | - 116 031,99 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Knowledge and innovation | 2016 | RD1/2018/802/DK: adequate controls on payment claims from 14/6/2016 - 15/10/2016 | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 54 991,30 | 0,00 | - 54 991,30 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Knowledge and innovation | 2017 | RD1/2018/802/DK: adequate controls on payment claims FY2017-FY2018 | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 396 460,44 | 0,00 | - 396 460,44 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Knowledge and innovation | 2018 | RD1/2018/802/DK: adequate controls on payment claims FY2017-FY2018 | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 35 194,32 | 0,00 | - 35 194,32 |
| | Certification | 2017 | Underpayments | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 21 504,51 | 0,00 | - 21 504,51 |
| | | | | | Total DK: | EUR | - 644 170,33 | 0,00 | - 644 170,33 |
| ES | Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures | 2016 | Absence of appropriate checks on double financing (Measure 8) – claim years 2015, 2016 and 2017 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 126 309,76 | - 1,98 | - 126 307,78 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures | 2017 | Absence of appropriate checks on double financing (Measure 8) – claim years 2015, 2016 and 2017 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 129 306,83 | 0,00 | - 129 306,83 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures | 2018 | Absence of appropriate checks on double financing (Measure 8) – claim years 2015, 2016 and 2017 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 108 473,76 | 0,00 | - 108 473,76 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Measures with flat-rate support | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES01 (Andalucia) - Flat rate | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 11 325,94 | 0,00 | - 11 325,94 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES01 (Andalucia) - Forestry | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 2 213 124,99 | 0,00 | - 2 213 124,99 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES01 (Andalucia) - Private | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 8 836 252,87 | 0,00 | - 8 836 252,87 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES01 (Andalucia) - Public | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 1 392 363,55 | 0,00 | - 1 392 363,55 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES02 (Aragon) - Forestry | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 4 817,72 | 0,00 | - 4 817,72 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures | 2017 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES02 (Aragon) - Forestry | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 3 840,31 | 0,00 | - 3 840,31 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES02 (Aragon) - Private | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 10 149,21 | 0,00 | - 10 149,21 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2017 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES02 (Aragon) - Private | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 16 101,35 | 0,00 | - 16 101,35 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Risk management | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES02 (Aragon) - Risk management | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 61 836,72 | 0,00 | - 61 836,72 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES03 (Asturias) - Forestry | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 13 764,12 | 0,00 | - 13 764,12 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures | 2017 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES03 (Asturias) - Forestry | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 31 023,61 | 0,00 | - 31 023,61 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES03 (Asturias) - Private | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 1 394,87 | 0,00 | - 1 394,87 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2017 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES03 (Asturias) - Private | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 240,90 | 0,00 | - 240,90 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES05 (Canarias) - Forestry | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 111 840,20 | 0,00 | - 111 840,20 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES05 (Canarias) - Private | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 102 836,23 | 0,00 | - 102 836,23 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES05 (Canarias) - Public | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 68 847,23 | 0,00 | - 68 847,23 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries | 2017 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES05 (Canarias) - Public | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 5 062,14 | 0,00 | - 5 062,14 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures | 2017 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES06 (Cantabria) - Forestry | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 11 758,61 | 0,00 | - 11 758,61 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES06 (Cantabria) - Public | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 210,72 | 0,00 | - 210,72 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES07 (Castilla La Mancha) - Private | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 10 211,08 | 0,00 | - 10 211,08 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES07 (Castilla La Mancha) - Public | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 965 059,79 | 0,00 | - 965 059,79 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES08 (Castilla y León) | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 9 893,19 | 0,00 | - 9 893,19 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES08 (Castilla y León) - Private | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 323 577,68 | - 38,46 | - 323 539,22 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries | 2017 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES14 (Navarra) | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 80,60 | 0,00 | - 80,60 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES14 (Navarra) - Private | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 9 354,11 | 0,00 | - 9 354,11 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2017 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES14 (Navarra) - Private | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 34 956,17 | 0,00 | - 34 956,17 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries | 2017 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES16 (Rioja) | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 495,23 | 0,00 | - 495,23 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures | 2017 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES16 (Rioja) - Forestry | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 1 866,91 | 0,00 | - 1 866,91 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES17 (Valencia) - Forestry | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 9 038,24 | 0,00 | - 9 038,24 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Knowledge and innovation | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs & weakness in KC: PP verification in ES01 (Andalucia) - Knowldege and Innovation | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 7 356,71 | 0,00 | - 7 356,71 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs & weakness in KC: PP verification in ES07 (Castilla-La Mancha) - Forestry | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 1 360 319,51 | 0,00 | - 1 360 319,51 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures | 2017 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs & weakness in KC: PP verification in ES07 (Castilla-La Mancha) - Forestry | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 914 156,35 | 0,00 | - 914 156,35 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs & weakness in KC: PP verification in ES10 (Extremadura) - Forestry | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 125 720,27 | 0,00 | - 125 720,27 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs & weakness in KC: PP verification in ES10 (Extremadura) - Private | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 533 410,31 | 0,00 | - 533 410,31 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2017 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs & weakness in KC: PP verification in ES10 (Extremadura) - Private | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 21 359,46 | 0,00 | - 21 359,46 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs & weakness in KC: PP verification in ES11 (Galicia) - Forestry | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 50 628,33 | 0,00 | - 50 628,33 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures | 2017 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs & weakness in KC: PP verification in ES11 (Galicia) - Forestry | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 20 607,65 | 0,00 | - 20 607,65 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs & weakness in KC: PP verification in ES11 (Galicia) - Private | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 63 782,15 | 0,00 | - 63 782,15 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2017 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs & weakness in KC: PP verification in ES11 (Galicia) - Private | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 373 034,97 | 0,00 | - 373 034,97 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs & weakness in KC: PP verification in ES13 (Murcia) - Forestry | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 76 520,85 | 0,00 | - 76 520,85 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2016 | Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs & weakness in KC: PP verification in ES13 (Murcia) - Private | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 209 311,13 | 0,00 | - 209 311,13 |
| | Cross-compliance | 2018 | CY 2017 | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 5 227,07 | 0,00 | - 5 227,07 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures | 2016 | Inappropriate evaluation of the reasonableness of costs using a comparison of different offers (Measure 227) - FY2016 | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 8 006,64 | - 975,50 | - 7 031,14 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS | 2016 | Incorrect timing of the on-the-spot checks (Measures 10.1.4 and 10.1.6) - claim year 2015 / FY 2016 | FLAT RATE | 2,00% | EUR | - 2 486,63 | 0,00 | - 2 486,63 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS | 2017 | Incorrect timing of the on-the-spot checks (Measures 10.1.4 and 10.1.6) - claim year 2015 / FY2017 | FLAT RATE | 2,00% | EUR | - 2 561,40 | 0,00 | - 2 561,40 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS | 2018 | Incorrect timing of the on-the-spot checks (Measures 10.1.4 and 10.1.6) - claim year 2015 /FY2018 | FLAT RATE | 2,00% | EUR | - 2 484,34 | 0,00 | - 2 484,34 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS | 2017 | No livestock headcount or assessment during the on-the-spot checks (Measure 13) - CY 2016 / FY2017 | ESTIMATED BY PERCENTAGE | 1,46% | EUR | - 97 169,24 | 0,00 | - 97 169,24 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS | 2016 | No livestock headcount or assessment during the on-the-spot checks (Measures 211, 212 and 13) - CY 2015 / FY2016 | ESTIMATED BY PERCENTAGE | 1,46% | EUR | - 100 060,20 | 0,00 | - 100 060,20 |
| | | | | | Total ES: | EUR | - 18 599 617,85 | - 1 015,94 | - 18 598 601,91 |
| FR | Certification | 2017 | Errors linked to expenditure - FY2017 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 22 802,68 | 0,00 | - 22 802,68 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS | 2017 | Known financial error - IACS population - FY2017 | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 1 517,58 | 0,00 | - 1 517,58 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS | 2017 | Most likely error - IACS population - FY2017 | ESTIMATED BY AMOUNT | | EUR | - 272 351,78 | 0,00 | - 272 351,78 |
| | Certification | 2017 | Most likely error - non-IACS population - FY2017 | ESTIMATED BY AMOUNT | | EUR | - 254 050,04 | 0,00 | - 254 050,04 |
| | | | | | Total FR: | EUR | - 550 722,08 | 0,00 | - 550 722,08 |
| GR | Rural Development EAFRD Investment - private beneficiaries | 2014 | "Appropriate evaluation of the reasonableness of costs using a suitable evaluation system" | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 11 576,75 | - 11 576,75 | 0,00 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2012 | "Appropriate evaluation of the reasonableness of costs using a suitable evaluation system" | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 18 169,56 | - 18 169,56 | 0,00 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2013 | "Appropriate evaluation of the reasonableness of costs using a suitable evaluation system" | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 12 381,57 | - 12 381,57 | 0,00 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2016 | Key control "Appropriate evaluation of the reasonableness of costs using a suitable evaluation system, such as reference costs, a comparison of different offers, or an evaluations committee | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 1 086 763,06 | 0,00 | - 1 086 763,06 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2017 | Key control "Appropriate evaluation of the reasonableness of costs using a suitable evaluation system, such as reference costs, a comparison of different offers, or an evaluations committee | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 554 918,10 | 0,00 | - 554 918,10 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2016 | Key control "appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications" | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 123 337,10 | 0,00 | - 123 337,10 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2017 | Key control "appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications" | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 993 611,51 | 0,00 | - 993 611,51 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2018 | Key control "appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications" | FLAT RATE | 10,00% | EUR | - 672 537,33 | 0,00 | - 672 537,33 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2011 | Key control "appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications" | FLAT RATE | 10,00% | EUR | - 13 840,39 | - 6 920,19 | - 6 920,20 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013) | 2012 | Key control "appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications" | FLAT RATE | 10,00% | EUR | - 18 158,25 | - 18 158,25 | 0,00 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries | 2016 | Key control "appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications" | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 679 818,83 | 0,00 | - 679 818,83 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2016 | Key control "appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications" | FLAT RATE | 10,00% | EUR | - 2 287 432,29 | 0,00 | - 2 287 432,29 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries | 2017 | Key control "appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications" | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 521 536,28 | 0,00 | - 521 536,28 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2017 | Key control "appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications" | FLAT RATE | 10,00% | EUR | - 2 409 223,60 | 0,00 | - 2 409 223,60 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries | 2018 | Key control "appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications" | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 95 746,91 | 0,00 | - 95 746,91 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2018 | Key control "appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications" and key control "Appropriate evaluation of the reasonableness of costs using a suitable evaluation system" | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 158 557,32 | 0,00 | - 158 557,32 |
| | | | | | Total GR: | EUR | - 9 657 608,85 | - 67 206,32 | - 9 590 402,53 |
| HU | Rural Development EAFRD Leader | 2015 | absence of appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications Leader M 411, 412 and 413 and M 19 transitional arrangements | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 76 289,54 | 0,00 | - 76 289,54 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Leader | 2016 | absence of appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications Leader M 411, 412 and 413 and M 19 transitional arrangements | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 378 156,47 | 0,00 | - 378 156,47 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Leader | 2017 | absence of appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications Leader M 411, 412 and 413 and M 19 transitional arrangements | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 529,03 | 0,00 | - 529,03 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Measures with flat-rate support | 2016 | Appropriate checks to ensure that the applicant fulfil all eligibility criteria of the aid scheme | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 19 458,44 | 0,00 | - 19 458,44 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Measures with flat-rate support | 2017 | Appropriate checks to ensure that the applicant fulfil all eligibility criteria of the aid scheme | FLAT RATE | 5,00% | EUR | - 12 518,38 | 0,00 | - 12 518,38 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD Measures with flat-rate support | 2017 | Appropriate checks to ensure that the applicant fulfil all eligibility criteria of the aid scheme and/or support measure Producer Groups | ONE OFF | | EUR | - 1 372 285,85 | 0,00 | - 1 372 285,85 |
| | | | | | Total HU: | EUR | - 1 859 237,71 | 0,00 | - 1 859 237,71 |
| IT | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2017 | FY 2017-2018 - Measure 4.1 - Flat Rate 3% - Reasonableness of costs | FLAT RATE | 3,00% | EUR | - 9 387,12 | 0,00 | - 9 387,12 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2018 | FY 2017-2018 - Measure 4.1 - Flat Rate 3% - Reasonableness of costs | FLAT RATE | 3,00% | EUR | - 57 352,08 | 0,00 | - 57 352,08 |
| | Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries | 2019 | FY 2019 - Measure 4.1 - Flat Rate 3% - Reasonableness of costs | FLAT RATE | 3,00% | EUR | - 38 152,27 | 0,00 | - 38 152,27 |
| | | | | | Total IT: | EUR | - 104 891,47 | 0,00 | - 104 891,47 |
| SE | Cross-compliance | 2016 | Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2015 | FLAT RATE | 10,00% | EUR | - 1 104 587,88 | 0,00 | - 104 587,88 |
| | Cross-compliance | 2017 | Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2015 | FLAT RATE | 10,00% | EUR | - 82 455,77 | 0,00 | - 82 455,77 |
| | Cross-compliance | 2018 | Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2015 | FLAT RATE | 10,00% | EUR | - 46 827,61 | 0,00 | - 46 827,61 |
| | Cross-compliance | 2016 | Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2016 | FLAT RATE | 10,00% | EUR | - 655 745,46 | 0,00 | - 655 745,46 |
| | Cross-compliance | 2017 | Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2016 | FLAT RATE | 10,00% | EUR | - 499 167,69 | 0,00 | - 499 167,69 |
| | Cross-compliance | 2018 | Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2016 | FLAT RATE | 10,00% | EUR | - 92 001,66 | 0,00 | - 92 001,66 |
| | Cross-compliance | 2018 | Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2017 | FLAT RATE | 10,00% | EUR | - 1 179 493,71 | 0,00 | - 1 179 493,71 |
| | | | | | Total SE: | EUR | - 3 660 279,78 | 0,00 | - 3 660 279,78 |
| | | | | | | | | | |

Member State

Measure

FY

Reason

Type

Correction %

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

AT

Clearance of Accounts - Financial Clearance

2018

Errors in EAGF and EAFRD population

ONE OFF

EUR

- 128,52

0,00

- 128,52

Total AT:

EUR

- 128,52

0,00

- 128,52

DE

Rural Development EAFRD Risk management

2016

deficiency in key control - eligibility of expenditure

ONE OFF

EUR

- 600 000,00

0,00

- 600 000,00

Rural Development EAFRD Risk management

2017

deficiency in key control - eligibility of expenditure

ONE OFF

EUR

- 500 000,00

0,00

- 500 000,00

Clearance of Accounts - Financial Clearance

2018

Random errors in EAFRD non-IACS population

ONE OFF

EUR

- 81 017,97

0,00

- 81 017,97

Total DE:

EUR

- 1 181 017,97

0,00

- 1 181 017,97

DK

Certification

2017

Difference between MLE calculated by Danish authorities on 15/02 report and MLE calculated by DGAGRI

ONE OFF

EUR

- 19 987,77

0,00

- 19 987,77

Certification

2017

Extrapolated error from reasonableness of costs additional testing

ONE OFF

EUR

- 116 031,99

0,00

- 116 031,99

Rural Development EAFRD Knowledge and innovation

2016

RD1/2018/802/DK: adequate controls on payment claims from 14/6/2016 - 15/10/2016

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 54 991,30

0,00

- 54 991,30

Rural Development EAFRD Knowledge and innovation

2017

RD1/2018/802/DK: adequate controls on payment claims FY2017-FY2018

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 396 460,44

0,00

- 396 460,44

Rural Development EAFRD Knowledge and innovation

2018

RD1/2018/802/DK: adequate controls on payment claims FY2017-FY2018

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 35 194,32

0,00

- 35 194,32

Certification

2017

Underpayments

ONE OFF

EUR

- 21 504,51

0,00

- 21 504,51

Total DK:

EUR

- 644 170,33

0,00

- 644 170,33

ES

Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures

2016

Absence of appropriate checks on double financing (Measure 8) – claim years 2015, 2016 and 2017

ONE OFF

EUR

- 126 309,76

- 1,98

- 126 307,78

Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures

2017

Absence of appropriate checks on double financing (Measure 8) – claim years 2015, 2016 and 2017

ONE OFF

EUR

- 129 306,83

0,00

- 129 306,83

Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures

2018

Absence of appropriate checks on double financing (Measure 8) – claim years 2015, 2016 and 2017

ONE OFF

EUR

- 108 473,76

0,00

- 108 473,76

Rural Development EAFRD Measures with flat-rate support

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES01 (Andalucia) - Flat rate

ONE OFF

EUR

- 11 325,94

0,00

- 11 325,94

Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES01 (Andalucia) - Forestry

ONE OFF

EUR

- 2 213 124,99

0,00

- 2 213 124,99

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES01 (Andalucia) - Private

ONE OFF

EUR

- 8 836 252,87

0,00

- 8 836 252,87

Rural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES01 (Andalucia) - Public

ONE OFF

EUR

- 1 392 363,55

0,00

- 1 392 363,55

Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES02 (Aragon) - Forestry

ONE OFF

EUR

- 4 817,72

0,00

- 4 817,72

Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures

2017

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES02 (Aragon) - Forestry

ONE OFF

EUR

- 3 840,31

0,00

- 3 840,31

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES02 (Aragon) - Private

ONE OFF

EUR

- 10 149,21

0,00

- 10 149,21

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2017

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES02 (Aragon) - Private

ONE OFF

EUR

- 16 101,35

0,00

- 16 101,35

Rural Development EAFRD Risk management

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES02 (Aragon) - Risk management

ONE OFF

EUR

- 61 836,72

0,00

- 61 836,72

Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES03 (Asturias) - Forestry

ONE OFF

EUR

- 13 764,12

0,00

- 13 764,12

Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures

2017

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES03 (Asturias) - Forestry

ONE OFF

EUR

- 31 023,61

0,00

- 31 023,61

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES03 (Asturias) - Private

ONE OFF

EUR

- 1 394,87

0,00

- 1 394,87

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2017

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES03 (Asturias) - Private

ONE OFF

EUR

- 240,90

0,00

- 240,90

Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES05 (Canarias) - Forestry

ONE OFF

EUR

- 111 840,20

0,00

- 111 840,20

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES05 (Canarias) - Private

ONE OFF

EUR

- 102 836,23

0,00

- 102 836,23

Rural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES05 (Canarias) - Public

ONE OFF

EUR

- 68 847,23

0,00

- 68 847,23

Rural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries

2017

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES05 (Canarias) - Public

ONE OFF

EUR

- 5 062,14

0,00

- 5 062,14

Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures

2017

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES06 (Cantabria) - Forestry

ONE OFF

EUR

- 11 758,61

0,00

- 11 758,61

Rural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES06 (Cantabria) - Public

ONE OFF

EUR

- 210,72

0,00

- 210,72

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES07 (Castilla La Mancha) - Private

ONE OFF

EUR

- 10 211,08

0,00

- 10 211,08

Rural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES07 (Castilla La Mancha) - Public

ONE OFF

EUR

- 965 059,79

0,00

- 965 059,79

Rural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES08 (Castilla y León)

ONE OFF

EUR

- 9 893,19

0,00

- 9 893,19

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES08 (Castilla y León) - Private

ONE OFF

EUR

- 323 577,68

- 38,46

- 323 539,22

Rural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries

2017

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES14 (Navarra)

ONE OFF

EUR

- 80,60

0,00

- 80,60

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES14 (Navarra) - Private

ONE OFF

EUR

- 9 354,11

0,00

- 9 354,11

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2017

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES14 (Navarra) - Private

ONE OFF

EUR

- 34 956,17

0,00

- 34 956,17

Rural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries

2017

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES16 (Rioja)

ONE OFF

EUR

- 495,23

0,00

- 495,23

Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures

2017

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES16 (Rioja) - Forestry

ONE OFF

EUR

- 1 866,91

0,00

- 1 866,91

Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs in ES17 (Valencia) - Forestry

ONE OFF

EUR

- 9 038,24

0,00

- 9 038,24

Rural Development EAFRD Knowledge and innovation

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs & weakness in KC: PP verification in ES01 (Andalucia) - Knowldege and Innovation

ONE OFF

EUR

- 7 356,71

0,00

- 7 356,71

Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs & weakness in KC: PP verification in ES07 (Castilla-La Mancha) - Forestry

ONE OFF

EUR

- 1 360 319,51

0,00

- 1 360 319,51

Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures

2017

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs & weakness in KC: PP verification in ES07 (Castilla-La Mancha) - Forestry

ONE OFF

EUR

- 914 156,35

0,00

- 914 156,35

Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs & weakness in KC: PP verification in ES10 (Extremadura) - Forestry

ONE OFF

EUR

- 125 720,27

0,00

- 125 720,27

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs & weakness in KC: PP verification in ES10 (Extremadura) - Private

ONE OFF

EUR

- 533 410,31

0,00

- 533 410,31

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2017

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs & weakness in KC: PP verification in ES10 (Extremadura) - Private

ONE OFF

EUR

- 21 359,46

0,00

- 21 359,46

Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs & weakness in KC: PP verification in ES11 (Galicia) - Forestry

ONE OFF

EUR

- 50 628,33

0,00

- 50 628,33

Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures

2017

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs & weakness in KC: PP verification in ES11 (Galicia) - Forestry

ONE OFF

EUR

- 20 607,65

0,00

- 20 607,65

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs & weakness in KC: PP verification in ES11 (Galicia) - Private

ONE OFF

EUR

- 63 782,15

0,00

- 63 782,15

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2017

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs & weakness in KC: PP verification in ES11 (Galicia) - Private

ONE OFF

EUR

- 373 034,97

0,00

- 373 034,97

Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs & weakness in KC: PP verification in ES13 (Murcia) - Forestry

ONE OFF

EUR

- 76 520,85

0,00

- 76 520,85

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2016

Calculated correction: absence of KC: Verification of Reasonableness of costs & weakness in KC: PP verification in ES13 (Murcia) - Private

ONE OFF

EUR

- 209 311,13

0,00

- 209 311,13

Cross-compliance

2018

CY 2017

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 5 227,07

0,00

- 5 227,07

Rural Development EAFRD forestry measures

2016

Inappropriate evaluation of the reasonableness of costs using a comparison of different offers (Measure 227) - FY2016

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 8 006,64

- 975,50

- 7 031,14

Rural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS

2016

Incorrect timing of the on-the-spot checks (Measures 10.1.4 and 10.1.6) - claim year 2015 / FY 2016

FLAT RATE

2,00%

EUR

- 2 486,63

0,00

- 2 486,63

Rural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS

2017

Incorrect timing of the on-the-spot checks (Measures 10.1.4 and 10.1.6) - claim year 2015 / FY2017

FLAT RATE

2,00%

EUR

- 2 561,40

0,00

- 2 561,40

Rural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS

2018

Incorrect timing of the on-the-spot checks (Measures 10.1.4 and 10.1.6) - claim year 2015 /FY2018

FLAT RATE

2,00%

EUR

- 2 484,34

0,00

- 2 484,34

Rural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS

2017

No livestock headcount or assessment during the on-the-spot checks (Measure 13) - CY 2016 / FY2017

ESTIMATED BY PERCENTAGE

1,46%

EUR

- 97 169,24

0,00

- 97 169,24

Rural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS

2016

No livestock headcount or assessment during the on-the-spot checks (Measures 211, 212 and 13) - CY 2015 / FY2016

ESTIMATED BY PERCENTAGE

1,46%

EUR

- 100 060,20

0,00

- 100 060,20

Total ES:

EUR

- 18 599 617,85

- 1 015,94

- 18 598 601,91

FR

Certification

2017

Errors linked to expenditure - FY2017

ONE OFF

EUR

- 22 802,68

0,00

- 22 802,68

Rural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS

2017

Known financial error - IACS population - FY2017

ONE OFF

EUR

- 1 517,58

0,00

- 1 517,58

Rural Development EAFRD measures subject to IACS

2017

Most likely error - IACS population - FY2017

ESTIMATED BY AMOUNT

EUR

- 272 351,78

0,00

- 272 351,78

Certification

2017

Most likely error - non-IACS population - FY2017

ESTIMATED BY AMOUNT

EUR

- 254 050,04

0,00

- 254 050,04

Total FR:

EUR

- 550 722,08

0,00

- 550 722,08

GR

Rural Development EAFRD Investment - private beneficiaries

2014

"Appropriate evaluation of the reasonableness of costs using a suitable evaluation system"

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 11 576,75

- 11 576,75

0,00

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2012

"Appropriate evaluation of the reasonableness of costs using a suitable evaluation system"

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 18 169,56

- 18 169,56

0,00

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2013

"Appropriate evaluation of the reasonableness of costs using a suitable evaluation system"

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 12 381,57

- 12 381,57

0,00

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2016

Key control "Appropriate evaluation of the reasonableness of costs using a suitable evaluation system, such as reference costs, a comparison of different offers, or an evaluations committee

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 1 086 763,06

0,00

- 1 086 763,06

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2017

Key control "Appropriate evaluation of the reasonableness of costs using a suitable evaluation system, such as reference costs, a comparison of different offers, or an evaluations committee

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 554 918,10

0,00

- 554 918,10

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2016

Key control "appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications"

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 123 337,10

0,00

- 123 337,10

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2017

Key control "appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications"

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 993 611,51

0,00

- 993 611,51

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2018

Key control "appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications"

FLAT RATE

10,00%

EUR

- 672 537,33

0,00

- 672 537,33

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2011

Key control "appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications"

FLAT RATE

10,00%

EUR

- 13 840,39

- 6 920,19

- 6 920,20

Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 - Investment orientated measures (2007-2013)

2012

Key control "appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications"

FLAT RATE

10,00%

EUR

- 18 158,25

- 18 158,25

0,00

Rural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries

2016

Key control "appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications"

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 679 818,83

0,00

- 679 818,83

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2016

Key control "appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications"

FLAT RATE

10,00%

EUR

- 2 287 432,29

0,00

- 2 287 432,29

Rural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries

2017

Key control "appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications"

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 521 536,28

0,00

- 521 536,28

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2017

Key control "appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications"

FLAT RATE

10,00%

EUR

- 2 409 223,60

0,00

- 2 409 223,60

Rural Development EAFRD investment - public beneficiaries

2018

Key control "appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications"

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 95 746,91

0,00

- 95 746,91

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2018

Key control "appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications" and key control "Appropriate evaluation of the reasonableness of costs using a suitable evaluation system"

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 158 557,32

0,00

- 158 557,32

Total GR:

EUR

- 9 657 608,85

- 67 206,32

- 9 590 402,53

HU

Rural Development EAFRD Leader

2015

absence of appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications Leader M 411, 412 and 413 and M 19 transitional arrangements

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 76 289,54

0,00

- 76 289,54

Rural Development EAFRD Leader

2016

absence of appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications Leader M 411, 412 and 413 and M 19 transitional arrangements

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 378 156,47

0,00

- 378 156,47

Rural Development EAFRD Leader

2017

absence of appropriate procedures for the selection and appraisal of projects or applications Leader M 411, 412 and 413 and M 19 transitional arrangements

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 529,03

0,00

- 529,03

Rural Development EAFRD Measures with flat-rate support

2016

Appropriate checks to ensure that the applicant fulfil all eligibility criteria of the aid scheme

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 19 458,44

0,00

- 19 458,44

Rural Development EAFRD Measures with flat-rate support

2017

Appropriate checks to ensure that the applicant fulfil all eligibility criteria of the aid scheme

FLAT RATE

5,00%

EUR

- 12 518,38

0,00

- 12 518,38

Rural Development EAFRD Measures with flat-rate support

2017

Appropriate checks to ensure that the applicant fulfil all eligibility criteria of the aid scheme and/or support measure Producer Groups

ONE OFF

EUR

- 1 372 285,85

0,00

- 1 372 285,85

Total HU:

EUR

- 1 859 237,71

0,00

- 1 859 237,71

IT

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2017

FY 2017-2018 - Measure 4.1 - Flat Rate 3% - Reasonableness of costs

FLAT RATE

3,00%

EUR

- 9 387,12

0,00

- 9 387,12

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2018

FY 2017-2018 - Measure 4.1 - Flat Rate 3% - Reasonableness of costs

FLAT RATE

3,00%

EUR

- 57 352,08

0,00

- 57 352,08

Rural Development EAFRD investment - private beneficiaries

2019

FY 2019 - Measure 4.1 - Flat Rate 3% - Reasonableness of costs

FLAT RATE

3,00%

EUR

- 38 152,27

0,00

- 38 152,27

Total IT:

EUR

- 104 891,47

0,00

- 104 891,47

SE

Cross-compliance

2016

Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2015

FLAT RATE

10,00%

EUR

- 1 104 587,88

0,00

- 104 587,88

Cross-compliance

2017

Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2015

FLAT RATE

10,00%

EUR

- 82 455,77

0,00

- 82 455,77

Cross-compliance

2018

Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2015

FLAT RATE

10,00%

EUR

- 46 827,61

0,00

- 46 827,61

Cross-compliance

2016

Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2016

FLAT RATE

10,00%

EUR

- 655 745,46

0,00

- 655 745,46

Cross-compliance

2017

Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2016

FLAT RATE

10,00%

EUR

- 499 167,69

0,00

- 499 167,69

Cross-compliance

2018

Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2016

FLAT RATE

10,00%

EUR

- 92 001,66

0,00

- 92 001,66

Cross-compliance

2018

Insufficient number of on-the-spot checks - Deficient scope and quality of on-the-spot checks - Non-application of sanctions - CY 2017

FLAT RATE

10,00%

EUR

- 1 179 493,71

0,00

- 1 179 493,71

Total SE:

EUR

- 3 660 279,78

0,00

- 3 660 279,78

| Currency | Amount | Deductions | Financial Impact |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| EUR | - 36 257 674,56 | - 68 222,26 | - 36 189 452,30 |

Currency

Amount

Deductions

Financial Impact

EUR

- 36 257 674,56

- 68 222,26

- 36 189 452,30

---