alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §7612. Statement of United States policy

It is the policy of the United States—

(1) to take immediate actions to stop the illegal global trade in wildlife and wildlife products and associated transnational organized crime;

(2) to provide technical and other forms of assistance to help focus countries halt the poaching of elephants, rhinoceroses, and other imperiled species and end the illegal trade in wildlife and wildlife products, including by providing training and assistance in—

(A) wildlife protection and management of wildlife populations;

(B) anti-poaching and effective management of protected areas including community managed and privately-owned lands;

(C) local engagement of security forces in anti-poaching responsibilities, where appropriate;

(D) wildlife trafficking investigative techniques, including forensic tools;

(E) transparency and corruption issues;

(F) management, tracking, and inventory of confiscated wildlife contraband;

(G) demand reduction strategies in countries that lack the means and resources to conduct them; and

(H) bilateral and multilateral agreements and cooperation;

(3) to employ appropriate assets and resources of the United States Government in a coordinated manner to curtail poaching and disrupt and dismantle illegal wildlife trade networks and the financing of those networks in a manner appropriate for each focus country;

(4) to build upon the National Strategy and Implementation Plan to further combat wildlife trafficking in a holistic manner and guide the response of the United States Government to ensure progress in the fight against wildlife trafficking; and

(5) to recognize the ties of wildlife trafficking to broader forms of transnational organized criminal activities, including trafficking, and where applicable, to focus on those crimes in a coordinated, cross-cutting manner.

(Pub. L. 114–231, title I, §102, Oct. 7, 2016, 130 Stat. 951.)
Exhibit 10.2

On May 23, 2005, the Company's Board of Directors  designated Stephanie L. Rode,
Senior Vice  President/Compliance and Risk Manager. The base salary for Ms. Rode
is $90,000 per year, subject to annual adjustments to be determined by the Board
of  Directors  in its sole  discretion.  Ms.  Rode will be  eligible  to receive
additional  compensation  under  the  terms of an  incentive  compensation  plan
adopted by the Board of Directors,  participation  in the Company's 401(k) Plan,
paid  time  off  in  accordance  with  the  Company's  Employee  Handbook,   and
reimbursement of reasonable business expenses.
### §825q. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–58, title XII, §1277(a), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 978

Section, act June 10, 1920, ch. 285, pt. III, §318, as added Aug. 26, 1935, ch. 687, title II, §213, 49 Stat. 863, related to conflict of jurisdiction.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective 6 months after Aug. 8, 2005, with provisions relating to effect of compliance with certain regulations approved and made effective prior to such date, see section 1274 of Pub. L. 109–58, set out as an Effective Date note under section 16451 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 91738 / April 30, 2021

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-17614

In the Matter of

Laurence I. Balter d/b/a Oracle 

Investment Research,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

EXTENSION ORDER

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested an extension of time until 

October 29, 2021 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution under Rule 1101(a) of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(a).

On May 26, 2017, the Commission issued an Order Making Findings and Imposing 

Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act 

of 1933, Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Sections 203(f) and 203(k) of the 

Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and Sections 9(b) and 9(f) of the Investment Company Act of 

1940 (the “Order”)1 against Laurence I. Balter d/b/a Oracle Investment Research (the 

“Respondent”). The Commission ordered the Respondent to pay $489,921 in disgorgement, 

$10,079 in prejudgment interest, and a $50,000 civil money penalty, for a total of 550,000, to the 

Commission. The Commission also created a Fair Fund, pursuant to Section 308(a) of the 

 

1

 Securities Act Rel. No. 10367 (May 26, 2017).
2

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, so the penalty paid, along with the disgorgement and interest paid, 

can be distributed to harmed investors (the “Fair Fund”).

The Fair Fund consists of the $550,000 in disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil 

money penalties paid by the Respondent.

In its request for an extension of time, the Division states that additional time is needed to 

complete the fund administrator appointment process, develop the distribution methodology, and 

develop the plan of distribution.

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s 

request for an extension of time until October 29, 2021 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution 

is granted. 

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.2

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

2

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(i).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     9
<LEGEND>
RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                        572,182
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          3,955
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                              190,455
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 2,250,952
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                0
<LOANS>                                     6,165,903
<ALLOWANCE>                                  (129,039)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              9,560,320
<DEPOSITS>                                  8,052,746
<SHORT-TERM>                                  331,796
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           166,645
<LONG-TERM>                                    57,192
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                   100,000
<COMMON>                                      253,825
<OTHER-SE>                                    598,116
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              9,560,320
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               487,918
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             142,457
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               11,065
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              641,440
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            248,593
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            265,807
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         375,633
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                 (12,417)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (5,306)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               326,920
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               173,674
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    112,818
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  112,818
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.84
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   4.89
<LOANS-NON>                                    16,080
<LOANS-PAST>                                    5,538
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                29,800
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              151,367
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  35,147
<RECOVERIES>                                   19,380
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             129,039
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          129,039
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        31,955


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 10.66 AMENDMENT
TO
EXCHANGE RIGHTS AGREEMENT
(CLASS B OPERATING PARTNERSHIP UNITS) Amendment, dated as of December 17, 2003 (this Amendment), to Exchange
Rights Agreement dated as of January 2, 1998, among Starwood Hotels & Resorts
Worldwide, Inc. (the Corporation), SLC Operating Limited Partnership (the
Operating Partnership) and certain limited partners of the Operating
Partnership (the Agreement). All capitalized terms used in this First
Amendment and not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings
assigned thereto in the Agreement. WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation has determined that it
is advisable and in the best interests of the Corporation and its shareholders
to exercise the Corporations right pursuant to Section 2(c) of the Agreement
to modify the right to exchange Class B OP Units pursuant to the Agreement, and
the amendment thereto, dated October 10, 2002, as set forth in this Amendment
to extend the period of time during which the holders of Class B OP Units can
exchange such units for Class B EPS. NOW, THEREFORE, the Corporation agrees, for its benefit and the benefit of
the holders of Class B OP Units, as follows:  1.
    
    Notwithstanding anything contained in Section 2(a) of the
Agreement or in the form of Letter of Transmittal attached thereto as
Exhibit A to the contrary, a holder of Class B OP Units may make a
Class B EPS Request in a Letter of Transmittal delivered to the Trust
after the Cross-Over Date and on or prior to January 2, 2005.2.
    
    Except as otherwise specifically set forth herein, all terms and
provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and
shall be unmodified by the effectiveness of this Amendment. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. has
adopted this Amendment as of the date first above written. STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC.By:Name:
    
    Kenneth S. SiegelTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary
#### § 299.1 Prescribed forms.

A listing of USCIS, ICE, and CBP approved forms referenced in chapter I can be viewed on the Office of Management and Budget Web site at *http://www.reginfo.gov.* A listing of approved USCIS forms can also be viewed on its Internet Web site.

[76 FR 53797, Aug. 29, 2011]
- Newsroom        - Press Releases
      - Public Statements
      - Speeches
      - Testimony
      - Spotlight Topics
      - Media Gallery
      - Upcoming Events
      - Webcasts
      - What's New
      - SEC Videos
      - Reports and Publications
      - RSS Feeds
      - Social Media 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

**FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENTS:** 85 FR 80875, December 14, 2020

**PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETINGS:** Wednesday, December 16, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.

**CHANGES IN THE MEETING:** The following item will not be considered during the Open Meeting on Wednesday, December 16, 2020:

2. The Commission will consider whether to adopt amendments under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act") to update rules that govern investment adviser marketing to accommodate the continual evolution and interplay of technology and advice, while preserving investor protections. The Commission will also consider whether to adopt amendments to Form ADV to provide the Commission with additional information about advisers' marketing practices, and corresponding amendments to the books and records rule under the Advisers Act.

In addition, the following previously scheduled matter will be considered on December 21, 2020, during the Open Meeting:

3. The Commission will consider whether to approve a proposed rule change by New York Stock Exchange LLC to amend Chapter One of the Listed Company Manual to modify the provisions relating to direct listings.

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:** For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: December 14, 2020

Vanessa A. CountrymanSecretary
§ 200.66 Requirements to ensure that funds do not benefit a private school. ( a ) An LEA must use funds under subpart A of this part to provide services that supplement, and in no case supplant, the services that would, in the absence of Title I services, be available to participating private school children.
( b ) ( 1 ) The LEA must use funds under subpart A of this part to meet the special educational needs of participating private school children.
( 2 ) The LEA may not use funds under subpart A of this part for— ( i ) The needs of the private school; or
( ii ) The general needs of children in the private school.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 6320(a), 6321(b))
[82 FR 31710, July 7, 2017]
### §7e. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, act Mar. 18, 1950, ch. 72, §5, 64 Stat. 28, provided definitions for sections 7a to 7e. See section 101501(a) of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
Mogollon Fleabane Lowland Leopard Frog

Arizona Hedgehog Cactus

00.09.1 0.2 03 04
ee Viles ( Aizona Hedgehog Habitat

So

|

Tonto National Forest
f Supervisor's Office Legend
UTM Zone 12 NAD83 \
| 16 Feb 2010 [_] Treatment Sites
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 73073 / September 11, 2014

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-16014

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

 :

KEITH MACDONALD : ORDER APPOINTING

SUMMERS, : TAX ADMINISTRATOR

:

:

Respondent. :

____________________________________:

By order dated January 17, 2013, the Commission issued the “Omnibus Order 

Directing the Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that 

Establish Distribution Funds” (“Omnibus Order”), Rel. No. 34-68683, authorizing the 

Secretary to issue orders during calendar years 2013-2015 appointing, upon request by 

the Commission staff, Damasco and Associates LLP (“Damasco”), a certified public 

accounting firm located in Half Moon Bay, California, as tax administrator (“Tax 

Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund may incur 

tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department of 

the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On September 10, 2014, the Commission staff requested, pursuant to the 

Omnibus Order, the appointment of Damasco as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in 

the above-referenced proceeding. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Damasco, pursuant to and in accordance with the Omnibus 

Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced 

proceeding. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Lynn M. Powalski

Deputy Secretary
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

101) ll-E-61 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:06 AM Sheet 101 of 264 
FEB-26-1997 14:05 INDIAN 

P.2 

P. 02 

A-94-52 

From: 

Contact Report 

Melanie Proctor, Pacific Environmental Services, 

Date: 

Contact: 

Company: 

February 26,1997 

Mr. Dewayne Zint 

Indian Industries 

Telephone Number: (S12) 467-1264 

Fax Number: (812) 467-1300 

Contact Summary: 

Mr. Zim was contacted to clarify information provided in the 1993 EPA screening survey 

submitted by Indian Industries. Mr. Zint explained that the sheet molding compound used for 

compression molding is purchased from outside sources and not produced at Indian Industries. 

When asked if Indian Industries has the potential to a major source, Mr. Zint explained 

that the facility has the potential to be major, but only due to other non reinforced plastics 

processes conducted at the facility. According to Mr. Zint, the other processes conducted at 

Indian Industries include processes such as painting, powder coating, UV ink application, and 

sandblasting. Mr. Zint explained that he included these processes and the reinforced plastics 

process in the facility's Title V application that he recently submitted to the state. 

Ms. Proctor explained that Indian Industries would be included into the EPA's National 

Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants database for the reinforced plastic composites 

industry because the facility has the potential to be major. Indian Industries will be added to 

compression molding process subcategory in the database. 

INFORMATION IS ACCURATE
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 21 - SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


                              HEALTH-CHEM CORPORATION
                          LIST OF SUBSIDIARY CORPORATIONS


                                                      State or Country
      Name                                            of Incorporation

Transderm Laboratories Corporation                       Delaware
Aberdeen Research Corporation                            Delaware
Capco Delaware, Inc.                                     Delaware
HS Protective Fabrics Corporation                        Delaware
H.S. Development, Inc.                                   Delaware
Health-Chem Industries, Inc.                             Delaware
Health Med Corporation                                   Delaware
Hercon Environmental Corporation                         Delaware
Hercon Laboratories Corporation                          Delaware
Hercon Pharmaceutical Corporation                        Delaware
Herculite Products, Inc.                                 New York
Medallion Group, Inc.                                    Delaware
Pacific Combining Corporation                            California
Research Development Corporation                         Delaware
Springs Development Corporation                          Delaware
York Aerosol Corporation                                 Delaware
York Aerosol Delivery Systems Corporation                Delaware
(No. 76-CC-2155

#### Gritschke and Cloke, Inc., Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 3, 1978.*

Winston & Strawn, by Gregory S. Murray, Attorneys for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Polos, C.J.

This is a claim for the sum of $5,414.58 which Claimant alleges it is due for engineering services performed for the State of Illinois.

On January 8,1968, the engineering firm of Neiler, Rich & Balden, Inc. entered into a contract with the Department of Public Works and Buildings of the State of Illinois, for electrical engineering work at the Manteno State Hospital. Claimant is the successor in interest and assignee of Neiler, Rich & Balden, Inc.

*181The total compensation due under the contract was $65,985.81. At the hearing herein Claimant established that it performed all work required under the contract, and that it was still due a balance of $5,414.58.

Respondent does not dispute that said sum is due and owing Claimant, and indicated that the monies had remained unpaid because the original appropriation for the expenditure had lapsed.

It is therefore ordered that Claimant be, and hereby is, awarded the sum of $5,414.58 in full satisfaction of its claim herein.
§ 206.3 Who is eligible to participate in a project? ( a ) *General.* To be eligible to participate in a HEP or a CAMP project— ( 1 ) A person, or his or her immediate family member, must have spent a minimum of 75 days during the past 24 months as a migrant or seasonal farmworker; or
( 2 ) The person must have participated (with respect to HEP within the last 24 months), or be eligible to participate, in programs under 34 CFR part 200, subpart C (Title I—Migrant Education Program) or 20 CFR part 633 (Employment and Training Administration, Department of Labor—Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker Programs).
( b ) *Special HEP qualifications.* To be eligible to participate in a HEP project, a person also must— ( 1 ) Not have earned a secondary school diploma or its equivalent;
( 2 ) Not be currently enrolled in an elementary or secondary school;
( 3 ) Be 16 years of age or over, or beyond the age of compulsory school attendance in the State in which he or she resides; and
( 4 ) Be determined by the grantee to need the academic and supporting services and financial assistance provided by the project in order to attain the equivalent of a secondary school diploma and to gain employment or be placed in an IHE or other postsecondary education or training.
( c ) *Special CAMP qualifications.* To be eligible to participate in a CAMP project, a person also must— ( 1 ) Be enrolled or be admitted for enrollment as a full-time student at the participating IHE;
( 2 ) Not be beyond the first academic year of a program of study at the IHE, as determined under the standards of the IHE; and
( 3 ) Be determined by the grantee to need the academic and supporting services and financial assistance provided by the project in order to complete an academic program of study at the IHE.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070d-2(a))
[46 FR 35075, July 6, 1981, as amended at 52 FR 24920, July 1, 1987; 57 FR 60407, Dec. 18, 1992; 75 FR 65769, Oct. 26, 2010]
#### Fred C. Ballweg et al., Appellants, v. Board of Election Commissioners et al., Appellees.

Appeals and *errors—failure to file proper abstract.*A mere index of the record is not an abstract within the requirements of the rules of the third district, and for failure to comply with such rules by the filing of a sufficient abstract an affirmance will be ordered.

*Mandamus.*Appeal from the Circuit Court of Sangamon county; the Hon. James A. Creighton, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the May term, 1910.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed December 7, 1910.

W. H. Nelms and Alfred Adams, for. appellants; Rufus M. Potts, of counsel.

H. L. Sheldon, for appellees.

Per *Curiam.*

Buie 22 of this court requires that a party bringing a cause into this court shall furnish a complete abstract or abridgment of the record. The purported abstract furnished by appellants in this cause is a mere index of the record and wholly fails to meet the requirements of the rule. For the failure of appellants to comply with said rule of this court the judgment of the Circuit Court will be affirmed.

*Affirmed.*