alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                   DAC TECHNOLOGIES GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC.

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of DAC
Technologies Group International, Inc. . (the "Company") for the period ended
March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), David A. Collins Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


/s/ David A. Collins
-----------------------------
David A. Collins,
Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 17, 2004
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-109-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. B.D., a juvenile, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 01-30336. D.C. No. CR-00-00076-DWM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*602Submitted May 8, 2002.*

Decided May 14, 2002.

Before RYMER, McKEOWN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Juvenile B.D. appeals from a term of commitment that the district court imposed following its revocation of B.D.’s probation. B.D. argues that the district court erred in refusing to dismiss the revocation proceeding as a result of the government’s admitted violations of 18 U.S.C. § 5035, which requires the government to prevent juveniles from having “regular contact” with adult inmates during prehearing detention, and to accord them appropriate medical care and access to educational opportunities. Assuming without deciding that aggravated, intentional, or egregious violations of § 5035 might constitute grounds for the district court to dismiss a revocation proceeding, *see United States v. Baker,*10 F.3d 1374, 1397 n. 6 (9th Cir.1993), we conclude that the government’s misconduct in this case was neither pervasive nor severe enough to warrant dismissal of the proceeding.

Although B.D. had contact with adults in two separate facilities during the initial phase of his prehearing detention, the government soon remedied most of his complaints. For example, the record does not indicate that he had any contact with adults subsequent to a detention hearing on August 29, 2001, less than two months after he was arrested for violating some of the terms of his probation. And, while we do not condone the government’s apparent failure to treat B.D.’s ingrown wisdom teeth and provide him with adequate educational opportunities, those isolated violations of § 5035 were not severe enough to warrant dismissing his revocation proceeding with prejudice.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.02



December 21, 1999


Larry E. Thomas
ANB Corporation
120 W. Charles Street
Muncie, IN 47305

                     RE: Post-Merger Payments to Mr. Thomas

Dear Mr. Thomas:

         The purpose of this letter is to set forth the agreement between ONB
Corporation ("ONB") and Larry E. Thomas (the "Executive") in respect of the 1999
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement entered into between the Executive and
ANB Corporation ("ANB") on May 10, 1999 (the "ANB Agreement").

         ONB agrees to continue the Executive's employment from the Effective
Time (as defined in the Agreement of Affiliation and Merger between ONB and ANB
dated July 29, 1999 (the "Merger Agreement")) and ending no later than the
ninetieth (90th) day following the Effective Time or such earlier date as
mutually agreed by ONB and the Executive.

         ONB agrees that within five (5) days following the Effective Time of
the Merger (each, as defined in the Merger Agreement), ONB shall make a lump sum
cash payment to the Executive in the amount of $488,219.00. The parties hereto
agree that such amount shall be in satisfaction of the amount that the Executive
is entitled to receive pursuant to Article III (E) (2) of the ANB Agreement and
that all other provisions of the ANB Agreement shall remain in effect.

         ONB further agrees that, in accordance with ANB's practice prior to the
Effective Time, ONB shall pay to the Executive an additional amount in cash such
that after such payment the Executive shall be in a net after-tax position,
taking into account all federal, state and local taxes, as though the Executive
had not incurred any such taxes with respect to termination and transfer of the
Executive's split-dollar life insurance plan.

         To indicate your agreement to the foregoing terms, please sign your
name where indicated below and return one copy of this letter to the
undersigned. Keep the other copy for your records.

                                        Old National Bancorp

                                            /s/ ALLEN R. MOUNTS
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        By: Allen R. Mounts
                                        Title: VP Director of Human Resources

AGREED AND ACCEPTED:

/s/ LARRY E. THOMAS
----------------------------
Larry E. Thomas


Dated
     -----------------------

cc: Jeff Knight - Old National Bancorp
    James Schrecongust - American National Bank
EXHIBIT 32.1

STATEMENT OF CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER/PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I, Howard L. Ehler, Jr., the Chief Operating Officer/Principal Executive Officer of Imperial Industries, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



(i)

the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:

March 28, 2011

| |                            
| | ---------------------------
| | /s/ HOWARD L. EHLER, JR.   
| | Howard L. Ehler, Jr.       
| | Chief Operating Officer/   
| | Principal Executive Officer



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
§ 273.4 Demonstration by carrier that screening requirements were met. ( a ) To be eligible to apply for reduction, refund, or waiver of a fine, the carrier shall provide evidence that it screened all passengers on the conveyance for the instant flight or voyage in accordance with the procedures listed in § 273.3.
( b ) The Service may, at any time, conduct an inspection of a carrier's document screening procedures at ports of embarkation to determine compliance with the procedures listed in § 273.3, to the extent permitted by the local competent authority responsible for port access or security. If necessary, the carrier shall use its good offices to obtain this permission from the local authority. If the carrier's port of embarkation operation is found not to be in compliance, the carrier will be notified by the Service that it will not be eligible for refund, reduction, or waiver of fines under section 273(e) of the Act unless the carrier can establish that lack of compliance was beyond the carrier's control.
#### § 1200.111 Notice.

The agency shall make available to employees, applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons such information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the agency, and make such information available to them in such manner as the head of the agency finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by section 504 and this part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from HL&P's 
financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0000048732
<NAME>   Houston Lighting & Power Company
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    8,769,626
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         371,163
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       903,146
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 621,324
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,665,259
<COMMON>                                     1,675,927
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                          2,150,086
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               3,826,013
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           51,055
<PREFERRED>                                    351,345
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         2,984,570
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  150,130
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       25,700
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      4,939
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 3,621
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               3,267,886
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               10,665,259
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    3,680,297
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           245,807
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   2,699,826
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   2,945,633
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        734,664
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (5,923)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 728,741
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       247,809
<NET-INCOME>                                   480,932
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     29,955
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  450,977
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       454,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      244,310
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         867,690
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4779 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4779

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 17, 2019

    Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To extend the Undertaking Spam, Spyware, And Fraud Enforcement With 
     Enforcers beyond Borders Act of 2006, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE U.S. SAFE WEB ACT OF 2006.

    Section 13 of the U.S. SAFE WEB Act of 2006 (Public Law 109-455; 15 
U.S.C. 44 note) is amended by striking ``September 30, 2020'' and 
inserting ``September 30, 2027''.

SEC. 2. REPORT.

    Not later than 3 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Federal Trade Commission shall transmit to the Committee on Energy 
and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report describing 
its use of and experience with the authority granted by the U.S. SAFE 
WEB Act of 2006 (Public Law 109-455) and the amendments made by such 
Act. The report shall include--
            (1) the number of cross-border complaints received and 
        acted upon by the Commission;
            (2) identification of the foreign agencies with which the 
        Commission has cooperated and the results of such cooperation, 
        including any foreign agency enforcement action or lack 
        thereof;
            (3) a description of Commission litigation brought in 
        foreign courts and the results of such litigation; and
            (4) any recommendations for legislation that may advance 
        the mission of the Commission in carrying out the U.S. SAFE WEB 
        Act of 2006 and the amendments made by such Act.

SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 16, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
### §937. United States Section as agency of United States

The United States Section shall, for the purposes of these 1 provisions of title 28, relating to claims against the United States and tort claims procedure, be deemed to be an agency of the United States.

(June 4, 1956, ch. 358, §8, 70 Stat. 243.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Provisions of title 28, relating to claims against the United States, referred to in text, include sections 1346(b), 2501 et seq., and 2671 et seq., of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

1 So in original. Probably should be "those".
#### § 241.20 Proceedings commenced prior to April 1, 1997.

Subpart B of 8 CFR part 241 applies to exclusion proceedings commenced prior to April 1, 1997. All references to the Act contained in this subpart are references to the Act in effect prior to April 1, 1997.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. George Conklin, Relator, against Blakely R. Webster, as Superintendent of Dannemora State Hospital, Respondent.

All concur.
Docket Number FAA-2014-0525

. Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 11/20/13

Regional Airline Association 11/20/13

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 11/20/13

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 11/20/13
EXHIBIT 31.2 CFO Certifications Under Section 302

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION

I, Mitchell Stough, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of OmniNet Media
Corporation
2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and we have:
          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure control
and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and
          c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5)    The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: July 5, 2006



By: /s/ Mitchell Stough
   --------------------
Name: Mitchell Stough
Chief Financial Officer


                                       13
### §832f. Elements in determining rates

It is the intent of Congress that rate schedules for the sale of electric energy which is or may be generated at the Bonneville project in excess of the amount required for operating the dam, locks, and appurtenant works at said project shall be determined with due regard to and predicated upon the fact that such electric energy is developed from water power created as an incident to the construction of the dam in the Columbia River at the Bonneville project for the purposes set forth in section 832 of this title. Rate schedules shall be drawn having regard to the recovery (upon the basis of the application of such rate schedules to the capacity of the electric facilities of Bonneville project) of the cost of producing and transmitting such electric energy, including the amortization of the capital investment over a reasonable period of years. Rate schedules shall be based upon an allocation of costs made by the Secretary of Energy. In computing the cost of electric energy developed from water power created as an incident to and a byproduct of the construction of the Bonneville project, the Secretary of Energy may allocate to the costs of electric facilities such a share of the cost of facilities having joint value for the production of electric energy and other purposes as the power development may fairly bear as compared with such other purposes.

(Aug. 20, 1937, ch. 720, §7, 50 Stat. 735; Pub. L. 95–91, title III, §301(b), Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 578.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Secretary of Energy" substituted in text for "Federal Power Commission" pursuant to Pub. L. 95–91, §301(b), which is classified to section 7151(b) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

The Federal Power Commission was terminated, and its functions, personnel, property, funds, etc., were transferred to the Secretary of Energy (except for certain functions which were transferred to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) by sections 7151(b), 7171(a), 7172(a), 7291, and 7293 of Title 42.
§ 226.4 What definitions apply to the State Charter School Facilities Incentive program? ( a ) *Definitions in the statute.* The following term used in this part is defined in section 4310 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA): Charter school
( b ) *Definitions in EDGAR.* The following terms used in this part are defined in 34 CFR 77.1: Applicant Application Award Department EDGAR Facilities Grant Grantee Project Public Secretary
( c ) *Other definition.* The following definition also applies to this part:
*Construction* means— ( 1 ) Preparing drawings and specifications for school facilities projects;
( 2 ) Repairing, renovating, or altering school facilities;
( 3 ) Extending school facilities;
( 4 ) Erecting or building school facilities; and
( 5 ) Inspections or supervision related to school facilities.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7221d(b); 7221i(1))
[70 FR 15003, Mar. 24, 2005, as amended at 87 FR 3661, Jan. 25, 2022]
! "
#


 
$
	# 
		 


!


"#"

$	







	




	


%&'("
"
)$"(#*	



%&
)

#
##
"
"
"
+
"
#

#


	


 
!	
	


	









	


	


%&,"$"#-.)/#""0

"$
#1*(
23
443%&123)"#+

"


#"

"".5
6"
$".6"((00#/#	
5$"#"0

1237.(
*."
*#
#""
$
/#

""
(8
$3*(+"%&)+"0

#
*.$
."




(((
$"".
5
$9#.
(*(0($
"$"
((*

"
(5##"
7.
(*


(((5#0
+#*
+"##


5$$"
"
$(
6
.85
*.*

123



5*.
$"(0($#


.$
"#"'("
"
/

#	
5+"0

"##*
:
"

'("
"
/#	
5$"#"0

'("
"
6".(*$"(##$5"

$'("
"
";5"#""*

 

<1=>?1'@4>?23?=-1>443

	"
'A
,-BCDC

+"#E$$*,-B

A"$=58,-BC

F"+"638"+-5"

((	5
,"0""C

1(%GFFFGC


	


	
"	 

Case 18-12095-BFK Doc 161 Filed 12/13/18 Entered 12/13/18 09:01:38 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
>?=?='("
"
"'33?>,=/#""$5

>?=?=.(
*.
$123
.#

#""

5("#"

'("
"
"
+#$$
"+
$>

/#""$5

>?=?=
((*
123%"".
5
$9

#%*.
55#0#$
(0($"
7.
(*


(((5#0


+"##
5$$"
"
$(
6
*5
.
56"
.
5((

5:


5"*""$+

$123
5"0*.
$*$#



((
6#*
#
$"	
5

%BUFE 

!"#-85
*	
5$


=""

$,"0""

"
	
	%

  HH
 
#
 
$




 

<1=>?1'@4>?23?=-1>443

	"
'A
,-BCDC

+"#E$$*,-B

A"$=58,-BC

F"+"638"+-5"

((	5
,"0""C

1(
%GFFFGC

=."( #0$$*I6(6

.


	


	
"	 

	
&%


 
 %%
#
 
&		

 
'



((%()%(*+

?"
#'5


+"#,


E#2-."443

>-
5--5"

(".
J

1(
%CFF

=."(#5
I0."

.

	

&
,	
-	.

		
#	



Dec 12 2018 /s/ Brian F. Kenney

Entered on Docket: December 13, 2018

Case 18-12095-BFK Doc 161 Filed 12/13/18 Entered 12/13/18 09:01:38 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3

 
 %%
!.
&	.









'



(/%(/%(*

A
88('
*

>$$"

$!"#-15

G58--5"D

'(K#",'FC

%GFGG

=."(A
88(I5#
:0
+

 
 
 '())*+,-,+-



*
"$*$
0
"0
##
#*((
*"

  HH
 
 #
 
$
 

	


F

Case 18-12095-BFK Doc 161 Filed 12/13/18 Entered 12/13/18 09:01:38 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3