alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OSWER/OSRTI

Washington, DC 20460

 NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL) ***Final Site*** September 2015 

MAINSTREETGROUND

WATERPLUME

Burnet, Texas

Burnet County

 Site Location:

The Main Street Ground Water Plume site is located between County Road 340 and County Road 340 A in Burnet 

County, Texas, approximately one mile south of the city limits of Burnet. 

 Site History:

The Main Street Ground Water Plume consists of a tetrachloroethylene (PCE)-contaminated ground water plume 

originating from an unknown source that released into the Ellenburger-San Saba Aquifer. Site contamination was

identified through monitoring of the Bertram Public Water Supply in 2010 by the Texas Commission on 

Environmental Quality (TCEQ).

 Site Contamination/Contaminants:

PCE is contaminating nine ground water wells, including two public supply wells and seven private water wells.

Currently PCE contamination levels in drinking water wells are below the EPA Clean Water Act’s maximum

contaminant levels (MCLs). Two wells exceeding MCLs are used for irrigation and livestock watering.

 Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment:

The two contaminated public drinking water supply wells and the seven contaminated private drinking water wells

serve more than 1100 residents. No filtration systems are in place on the contaminated wells. The private drinking 

water wells in the contaminated aquifer are the only source of water for residents who live outside the city limits of 

Burnet. 

 Response Activities (to date):

No response actions have taken place.

 Need for NPL Listing:

The state of Texas referred the site to the EPA because without identification and investigation of the source of ground

water contamination and remediation of the contaminated ground water plume, additional public and private wells

may be threatened. Other federal and state cleanup programs were evaluated but are not viable at this time. The EPA

received a letter of support for placing this site on the NPL from the state.

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may

change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56 FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent

FR notices.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to

these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on

the Internet at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/index.asp or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
HERCULES INCORPORATED 10-K96
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          30,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  394,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    279,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               739,000
<PP&E>                                       2,349,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,484,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,386,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          694,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        79,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     808,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,386,000
<SALES>                                      2,060,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,060,000
<CGS>                                        1,320,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  299,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                485,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   160,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            325,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   325,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit (a)(10)
 

                             ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY
                               BOARD OF DIRECTORS

                                   RESOLUTIONS

     WHEREAS,  the Company and its Board of Directors  believe it is in the best
interests of the Company to make  certain  modifications  to the Illinois  Power
Company  Employee  Retention Plan (the "Plan") and  Agreements,  to preserve the
original  purpose of the Plan and the  Agreements,  which is to  facilitate  the
retention of the services of motivated officers and employees of the Company and
to clarify certain administrative issues;

     RESOLVED,  that pursuant to the amending authority reserved to the Board of
Directors of the Company,  the Plan and the Employee  Retention  Agreements  are
hereby amended, effective February 7, 1996, in the following respects:

     1.   Employees  in Salary Band 4 who have not entered in separate  Employee
          Retention   Agreements   with  the  Company   shall  be  eligible  for
          participation in the Plan.

     2.   The  definition of "Good Reason" set forth in Section  3(a)(ii) of the
          Plan is hereby expanded to include a reduction in any material element
          of an eligible employee's compensation.

     3.   The  definition of "Change in Control" set forth in Section  3(a)(iii)
          of the Plan and as set forth in the  Agreements is hereby  modified to
          clarify  that the  acquisition  of stock by a trustee of any  employee
          benefit plan maintained by the Company will not be treated as a Change
          in  Control,  and to  clarify  that in no event will a merger or other
          transaction   result  in  a  Change  in  Control   if  the   Company's
          shareholders own at least 80 percent of the surviving entity.
         
     4.   Eligible  employees who are terminated prior to a Change in Control at
          the request of a potential  acquiror  will be  eligible  for Plan,  or
          Agreement, benefits.
         
     5.   The  provision  in Section 2 of the Plan and in the  Agreements  which
          authorizes the Board to determine,  after the fact, that a transaction
          is not a Change in Control is hereby eliminated.

     6.   The  Company,  and its  successors  and  assigns,  waive any  contract
          formation  or other  defenses it may  otherwise  be entitled to assert
          with respect to the Plan.

     RESOLVED, that the proper officers of the Company are hereby authorized and
directed  to do any and all acts and things and to execute  and  deliver any and
all documents or  instruments,  including but not limited to the preparation and
execution of an amended Plan document and of amended  Agreements,  as they shall
deem  necessary  or  appropriate  to carry of the  intent  and  purposes  of the
foregoing resolution.
IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT JA CKSON NOVEMBER 1997 SESSION

STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) ) NO. 02C01-9611-CR-00425 Appellee, ) ) SHELBY COUNTY VS. ) ) HON. JAMES C. BEASLEY, JR ., DAVID S. PREN TICE, ) JUDGE ) Appellant. ) (Habitual Motor Vehicle Offender)

FOR THE APPELLANT : A. C. WHARTON, JR. Shelby County Public

Defender WALKER GWINN Assistant Public Defender 201 Poplar Avenue, Suite 201 Memphis, Tennessee 38103 FOR THE APPEL LEE : JOHN KNOX WALKUP Attorney General and Repor ter CLI NTO N J. MOR GAN Assistant Attorney Gener al 450 James Robertson Parkwa y Nashville, TN 37243-0493 WILLIAM L. GIBBONS District Attorney General LEE V. COFFEE Assistant

District Attorney General 201 Poplar Avenue, Suite 301 Memphis, Tennessee 38103

OPINION FI LED:

AFFIRMED

JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE1 The notice of appeal was untimely filed; however, we waive the timely filing requirement. Tenn. R. Crim. P. 4(a). OPINION
Appellant, David S. Prentice, co ntends the Habitual Motor Vehi cle Offender Act (HMVO Act) viol ates double jeopardy princi ples. On May 23, 1996, appellant w as declared an Habitual Motor Vehicle Offender (HMVO) based upon appropr iate prior convictions. His mot ion to dismiss based upon double jeopardy was denied. We AFFIRM the order of the trial court.

DOUBLE JEOPARDY AND THE HM VO ACT

State v. Conley , 639 S.W.2d 435, 43 7 (Tenn. 1982), found the double jeopardy defense to be unavailable to the HMVO declaration since the rev ocation of driving privileges is remedial and not punitive i n nature. This reasoning has been followed in rec ent mon ths by this Court. See State v. Watson , C.C.A. No. 02C01- 9610-CR-00377

(Tenn. Crim. App. filed September 17, 1997, at Jackson); State v. Rowlett , C.C.A. No. 01C01-9605-CC -00211 (Tenn. Crim. App. filed August 22, 1997, at Nashville); State v. Spears , C.C.A. No. 02C01-9606-CR-00197 (Tenn. Crim. App. filed July10, 1997, at Jackson). We see no reason to dev iate from these holdings.

CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons , we AFFIRM the judg ment of the trial court. 1

JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE
CONCUR:

GARY R. WADE, JUDGE
DAVID G. HAYES, JUDG E
§ 669.9 Certification content. The certification shall consist of the following elements: ( a ) A statement by the Governor of the state or a state official designated by the Governor, that evidence of payment of the heavy vehicle use tax is being obtained as a condition of registration for all vehicles subject to such tax. The statement shall include the inclusive dates of the period during which payment of the heavy vehicle use tax was verified as a condition of registration.
( b ) The certifying statement required by paragraph (a) of this section shall be worded as follows: I (name of certifying official), (position, title), of the State of ( ), do hereby certify that evidence of payment of the heavy vehicle use tax pursuant to section 4481 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, is being obtained as a condition of registration for vehicles subject to such tax in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 141(c) and applicable IRS rules. This certification is for the period ( ) to ( ).
( c ) For the initial certification, submit a copy of any state law or regulation pertaining to the implementation of 23 U.S.C. 141(c); for subsequent certifications, submit a copy of any new or revised laws and regulations pertaining to the implementation of 23 U.S.C. 141(c).
[51 FR 25364, July 14, 1986, as amended at 75 FR 43409, July 26, 2010]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>             
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          YEAR     
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1995     
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1995     
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1     
<CASH>                              403,667     
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                  927     
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                     96,321     
<TRADING-ASSETS>                          0     
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>       2,350,229     
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                    0     
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                      0     
<LOANS>                           4,723,195     
<ALLOWANCE>                         150,516     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    7,755,719     
<DEPOSITS>                        6,569,697     
<SHORT-TERM>                        265,126     
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                 118,728     
<LONG-TERM>                          34,361     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0     
<PREFERRED>                               0     
<COMMON>                            246,357     
<OTHER-SE>                          521,450     
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>    7,755,719     
<INTEREST-LOAN>                     389,609     
<INTEREST-INVEST>                   195,869     
<INTEREST-OTHER>                      7,368     
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                    562,846     
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                  226,669     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  242,090     
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>               320,756     
<LOAN-LOSSES>                         1,140     
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                      248     
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                     284,078     
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     139,752     
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>          128,885     
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0     
<CHANGES>                                 0     
<NET-INCOME>                        128,885     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          1.02     
<EPS-DILUTED>                          1.02     
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                         4.69     
<LOANS-NON>                          17,692     
<LOANS-PAST>                          2,922     
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                          0     
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                      23,100     
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                    156,005     
<CHARGE-OFFS>                        24,985     
<RECOVERIES>                         18,356     
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                   150,516     
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                150,516     
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                       0     
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>              45,700     
                                                

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 1212

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1212 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10353, Mar. 5, 2003.

#### § 1212.13 Severability.

The provisions of part 1212 are separate and severable from one another. In the event that any provision in part 1212 is stayed, enjoined, not implemented, or otherwise held invalid, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless be implemented as an independent rule and continue in effect.

[85 FR 80400, Dec. 11, 2020]
#### Public Bank of New York, Plaintiff, Henry B. Singer, Receiver, Appellant, *v.*Louis London, Respondent, Impleaded with Annie London and Others, Defendants.

First Department,

December 5, 1913.

Foreclosure —receiver of rents — duty of owner in possession to pay for use and occupation.

The owner of real property under foreclosure, who occupies a portion thereof, is bound to pay to the receiver of rents appointed in the action the reasonable value of his use and occupation, and, upon his refusal, an order will be granted compelling payment.

Appeal by Henry B. Singer, as receiver, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 15th day of September, 1913, denying his application for an order fixing the rental value of certain property.

*Abraham H. Rubenstein,*for the appellant.

*Monte London,*for the respondent.

Hotchkiss, J.:

The appellant is a receiver of rents appointed in this action brought to foreclose a mortgage. The respondent is the owner of the fee of the premises under foreclosure and occupied a portion of the premises. The respondent having refused to comply with the demand of the receiver that he pay a reasonable sum for use and occupation, the receiver applied to the court below for an order to compel the respondent to pay such sum, amounting to $150 a month, or to vacate the premises, and the application was denied. By the appointment of the receiver the court took control of the premises, and the respondent as an occupant of a portion thereof stands in no better position than would a tenant and is equally bound to pay the receiver for the value of his use and occupation. Necessarily this must be so, for otherwise if the owner against whom foreclosure was pending occupied the whole of the mortgaged premises, the appointment of a receiver would be a futile thing and the order of the court would be without value for the protection of the *res*over *485which.it had assumed jurisdiction. The fact that the jurisdiction of the court in such cases is so elementary is probably the reason why so few precedents are to be found, but *Gunning*v. *Bowers*(1 Law Bull. 19) is directly in point.

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Soott and Dowling, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUTIDED FINANCIAL STATEMENT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 THAT WERE
FILED WITH THE COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUAILIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001101912
<NAME> PRIVATE ACCESS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         (1)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### § 490.515 Severability.

The provisions of §§ 490.105(c)(5), 105(d), 105(d)(1)(v), 105(d)(4), 105(e)(1)(i), 105(e)(1)(ii), 105(e)(4)(i)(C), 105(e)(4)(iii), 105(e)(10), 105(f)(1)(i), 105(f)(3), 105(f)(10), 107(a)(1), 107(b)(1)(i), 107(b)(1)(ii)(H), 107(b)(2)(i), 107(b)(2)(ii)(J), 107(b)(3)(i), 107(b)(3)(ii)(I), 107(c)(2), 107(d), 109(d)(1)(v), 109(d)(1)(vi), 109(d)(1)(vii), 109(d)(1)(viii), 109(e)(4)(vi), 109(e)(4)(vii), 109(e)(6), 109(f)(1)(v), 503(a)(2), 505, 507(b), 509(f), 509(g), 509(h), 511(a)(2), 511(c), 511(d) 511(f), and 513(d) are separate and severable from one another and from the other provisions of this part. If any provision is stayed or determined to be invalid, the remaining provisions shall continue in effect.

[88 FR 85393, Dec. 7, 2023]
# Official Journal L 101/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 101 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6423 March 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 101

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6423 March 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Serbia on actions carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of Serbia | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/489 of 19 March 2021 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1809 concerning certain protective measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2021) 1979)

   (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| | * | Decision (EU) 2021/490 of the European Central Bank of 12 March 2021 on the total amount of annual supervisory fees for 2020 (ECB/2021/8) | 107 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Serbia on actions carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of Serbia

1

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/489 of 19 March 2021 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1809 concerning certain protective measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States
  (notified under document C(2021) 1979)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2021) 1979)

1

2

*

Decision (EU) 2021/490 of the European Central Bank of 12 March 2021 on the total amount of annual supervisory fees for 2020 (ECB/2021/8)

107

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.