alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(No. 77-CC-1319

#### King Scott, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December 4, 1978.*

Nate Finn, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Glen P. Larner, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

This claim coming on to be heard on the joint stipulation of the parties hereto, and the Court being fully advised in the premises.

This Court finds that Claimant, King Scott, seeks recovery of $1,000.00 for damages incurred from being *687attacked and beaten by a patient at Manteno Mental Health Center.

The joint stipulation entered into between the parties, to which was attached the departmental reports of the Department of Mental Health, contained the following information:

On July 24,1975, King Scott was in the parking lot outside of the security building at Manteno Mental Health Center, his status being that of an authorized visitor to the institution. While Claimant Scott was waiting in his car in the parking lot, he was approached and attacked by a Leroy Johnson for no apparent reason.

Patient Johnson had a history of violent behavior and it was noted throughout his medical history that he had assaulted other people without warning or provocation. Despite the known propensity of Leroy Johnson for violence towards others, he was given a grounds pass by the staff which allowed him to go unaccompanied into areas frequented by visitors.

There was no indication that Claimant provoked patient Johnson in any way, or that Johnson had any rational reason for attacking Claimant. Upon questioning the patient about this incident, he stated, “I hit him in the face because he put a spell on my cigarette.”

From the foregoing facts, it appears that Respondent knew that Leroy Johnson was a violent individual and, therefore, should not have allowed him to enter the visitor area unattended. It appears further that Claimant was exercising due care for his own safety. The joint stipulation states both that Respondent was negligent in allowing the incident to happen and that *688Claimant used due care for his own safety.

This Court has held on previous occasions that the State is required to exercise reasonable care in restraining and controlling dangerous persons committed to its custody, so that they will not have the opportunity to inflict a foreseeable injury upon others. *Malloy v. State, 18 Ill.Ct.Cl. 137; Callbeck v. State, 22 Ill.Ct.Cl. 722; Maloney v. State, 22 Ill.Ct.Cl. 567.*

Both parties have stipulated that the amount of Claimant’s loss is $850.00.

Claimant, King Scott, is hereby awarded damages in the sum of $850.00.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 96813 / February 6, 2023

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20252

In the Matter of

Scott T. Wolfrum,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

EXTENSION ORDER

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested an extension of time until 

October 31, 2023 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution under Rule 1101(a) of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(a).

On March 24, 2021, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Administrative and 

Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 

and Sections 203(f) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Making Findings, and 

Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order (the “Order”)1against Scott T. 

Wolfrum (the “Respondent”). In the Order, the Commission found that the Respondent failed to 

disclose conflicts of interest when recommending that his advisory clients invest in Foundry 

Mezzanine Opportunity Fund (“FMOF” or the “Fund”), a private fund that provides lending to 

and invests in small businesses. From December 2015 to June 2018, Wolfrum sold more than

$20 million in interests in FMOF, almost all of which were recommended by Wolfrum and sold 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 91401 (Mar. 24, 2021).
2

to his advisory clients. Wolfrum failed to disclose to his clients the conflicts of interest created 

by his and his family member's financial interests in two of the Fund's holdings and Wolfrum's 

receipt of $140,125.00 in finder's fees for facilitating two different investments by the Fund. The 

Commission ordered the Respondent to pay $140,125.00 in disgorgement, $21,354.00 in 

prejudgment interest, and a $75,000.00 civil money penalty, for a total of $236,479.00, to the 

Commission. The Commission also created a Fair Fund, pursuant to Section 308(a) of the 

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, so the penalty paid, along with the disgorgement and interest paid, 

can be distributed to harmed investors (the “Fair Fund”).

The Fair Fund consists of the $236,479.00 paid by the Respondent. The Fair Fund has 

been deposited in a Commission-designated account at the U.S. Department of the Treasury, and 

any accrued interest will be added to the Fair Fund. 

In its request for an extension of time, the Division states that additional time is needed to 

combine this matter with a related case, complete the fund administrator solicitation and 

appointment process, develop the distribution methodology, and prepare the proposed plan of 

distribution.

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s 

request for an extension of time until October 31, 2023 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution 

is granted. 

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.2

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

2

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(i).
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE00547A1

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
§ 902.6 Appeal to the Attorney General. ( a ) The Federal Bureau of Investigation or a Compact Party State may appeal the decision of the Council to the U.S. Attorney General pursuant to Section (c) of Article XI of the Compact.
( b ) Appeals shall be filed and conducted pursuant to rules and procedures that may be established by the Attorney General.
( c ) Appropriate notice of an appeal shall be communicated to the Council Chairman by the appealing party.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 97855 / July 7, 2023

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-20003

In the Matter of

Unikrn, Inc.,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

ENTER AN ORDER APPROVING OR 

DISAPPROVING PLAN OF 

DISTRIBUTION

On January 13, 2023, pursuant to Rule 1103 of the United States Securities and Exchange 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans (the “Commission’s Rules”), 

17 C.F.R.§ 201.1103, the Commission published a Notice of Proposed Plan of Distribution and 

Opportunity to Comment (“Notice”)1for the distribution of monies placed into a Fair Fund in the 

above-captioned matter. The Notice invited public comment on the proposed plan of distribution

(“Plan”) through February 13, 2023, and the Commission received three public comments that 

raised various issues (the “Comments”).

Rule 1104 of the Commission’s Rules, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1104, provides in relevant part, 

“[t]he order approving or disapproving the plan should be entered within 30 days after the end of 

the final period allowed for comments on the proposed plan unless the Commission or the 

hearing officer, by written order, allows a longer period for good cause shown.”

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 96665 (Jan. 13, 2023).
2

On March 1, 2023, the Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority, issued an order 

extending the time to enter an order approving or disapproving the Plan until July 13, 2023.2

The Division now states additional time is needed to present its recommendation to the 

Commission regarding the Comments and the Plan, and therefore, good cause has been shown to 

enter an order extending time to approve or disapprove the Plan until December 31, 2023.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1104 of the Commission’s Rules,3

for good cause shown, the time for entering an order approving or disapproving the Plan is 

extended to December 31, 2023.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary

2

 See Order Extending Time to Enter Order Approving or Disapproving Plan of Distribution, Exchange Act Rel. 

No. 97008 (Mar. 1, 2023).

3

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1104.
### §631. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, acts Feb. 14, 1903, ch. 552, §7, 32 Stat. 828; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736, vested control over fur seal, salmon, and other fisheries in Alaska in Department of the Interior.
§ 337.7 Information and assignment of individuals under exclusive jurisdiction. ( a ) No later than at the time of the examination on the application pursuant to § 335.2 of this chapter, an employee of USCIS shall advise the applicant of his or her right to elect the site for the administration of the oath of allegiance, subject to the exclusive jurisdiction provision of § 310.3(d) of this chapter. In order to assist the applicant in making an informed decision, USCIS shall advise the applicant of the upcoming Immigration Judge or USCIS conducted and judicial ceremonies at which the applicant may appear, if found eligible for naturalization.
( b ) An applicant whose application has been approved by USCIS who is subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of a court pursuant to § 310.2(d) of this chapter, shall be advised of the next available court ceremony and provided with a written notice to appear at that ceremony. If the applicant is subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of more than one court exercising exclusive jurisdiction, the applicant will be informed of the upcoming ceremonies in each affected court. The applicant shall decide which court he or she wishes to administer the oath of allegiance.
[58 FR 49915, Sept. 24, 1993, as amended at 60 FR 37804, July 24, 1995; 76 FR 53803, Aug. 29, 2011]
### §460p. Establishment

In order to provide for the public outdoor recreation use and enjoyment thereof by the people of the United States, the Secretary of Agriculture shall establish the Spruce Knob-Seneca Rocks National Recreation Area in the State of West Virginia.

(Pub. L. 89–207, §1, Sept. 28, 1965, 79 Stat. 843.)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 28, 2013

t1021

Order 

Clerk

October 28, 2013

147456

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147456

COA: 301620 

Oakland CC: 2010-231058-FC

SAMANTHA LORRAINE LOMASNEY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 13, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 19, 2011 | /s/ Dirk L. Benschop                                                                                       |
|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              | Dirk L. Benschop, Director, Chief Executive Officer, President and Treasurer |

| Date:  May 19, 2011 | /s/ Leslie G. Pettitt                                                                                                          |
|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    | Leslie G. Pettitt, Director, Chief Financial Officer and principal accounting officer  |

----
NELSON WAGNER 

Trial Attorney, Tax Division 

U.S. Department of Justice 

Bar No.: 989413 (D.C.) 

P.O. Box 227, Ben Franklin Station 

Washington, DC 20044 

Tel: (202) 616-3369 

Fax: (202) 514-6866 

Email: Nelson.Wagner@usdoj.gov 

Attorney for Defendant Internal Revenue Service

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

Alexandria Division 

In re: ) 

 ) 

TYRONE A. CONARD, ) 

JOYCE L. CONARD, ) 

 ) 

 Debtors. ) 

______________________________________ ) 

 ) 

TYRONE A. CONARD, ) 

JOYCE L. CONARD, )

 ) 

 PlaintiffS, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) 

 ) 

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

______________________________________ ) 

Case No. 14-10093-RGM 

Chapter 7 

Adv. Proc. No. 16-01121-RGM 

UNITED STATES’ ANSWER TO ADVERSARY COMPLAINT 

The United States of America, Internal Revenue Service, answers the Debtors’ Adversary 

Complaint as follows: 

1. The United States admits the allegations of Paragraph 1. 

2. The United States admits the allegations of Paragraph 2. 

3. The United States admits the allegations of Paragraph 3. 

Case 16-01121-KHK Doc 7 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 17:46:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
2 

4. The United States admits the allegations of Paragraph 4. 

5. The United States admits the allegations of Paragraph 5. 

DEFENSES 

A. The United States avers that the debtors’ tax debt for years 2003-2010 is nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(1)(C) because the debtors “willfully 

attempted . . . to evade or defeat such tax.” 

B. The Complaint fails to allege facts sufficient to state a claim upon which relief can be 

granted. 

REQUEST FOR RELIEF 

WHEREFORE, the United States of America respectfully requests that the Court: 

A. Determine that the debtors’ federal income tax liabilities for tax years 2003-2010 were 

not discharged; and 

B. Award such other and further relief as the Court may deem to be just and proper. 

Dated: August 22, 2016 CAROLINE D. CIRAOLO 

Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General 

/s/ Nelson Wagner 

NELSON WAGNER 

989413 (D.C.) 

Trial Attorney, Tax Division 

U.S. Department of Justice 

P.O. Box 227 

Washington, D.C. 20044 

202-616-3369 (v) 

202-514-6866 (f) 

Nelson.Wagner@usdoj.gov 

 

Case 16-01121-KHK Doc 7 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 17:46:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on August 22, 2016, I electronically filed the foregoing document 

with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to 

the following: 

Counsel for Debtor

Robert R. Weed 

Email: robertweedlaw@yahoo.com 

Trustee

Kevin R. McCarthy 

Email: krm@mccarthywhite.com 

/s/ Nelson Wagner 

NELSON WAGNER 

Case 16-01121-KHK Doc 7 Filed 08/22/16 Entered 08/22/16 17:46:52 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
```

[114th Congress Public Law 225]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 925]]

Public Law 114-225
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the United States Customs and Border Protection Port of 
   Entry located at 1400 Lower Island Road in Tornillo, Texas, as the 
   ``Marcelino Serna Port of Entry''. <<NOTE: Sept. 29, 2016 -  [H.R. 
                                5252]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. MARCELINO SERNA PORT OF ENTRY.

    (a) Designation.--The United States Customs and Border Protection 
Port of Entry located at 1400 Lower Island Road in Tornillo, Texas, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Marcelino Serna Port of Entry''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the port of entry 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Marcelino Serna Port of Entry''.

    Approved September 29, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5252:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            July 11, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 20, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE INCOME
STATEMENT, STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AND STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS SET FORTH
AT PAGES 29, 30 AND 31 RESPECTIVELY, OF THIS REPORT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             134
<SECURITIES>                                        25
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,876
<ALLOWANCES>                                        38
<INVENTORY>                                      1,028
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,258
<PP&E>                                           3,045
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,916
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,319
<BONDS>                                          1,177
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           282
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,108
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,411
<SALES>                                          8,028
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,028
<CGS>                                            5,425
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,425
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,804
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    16
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    703
<INCOME-TAX>                                       232
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                471
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       471
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.65
        

</TABLE>
### §758c. Authorization of appropriations for research laboratory, experiment stations, dock and storehouse facilities, vessels, etc., for activities in the Pacific Ocean; transfer of surplus vessels

There is hereby authorized to be appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such amounts as may be necessary for the construction, including architectural services, and for furnishings and equipment of a fishery research laboratory and experiment stations in the State of Hawaii and necessary substations at suitable locations, together with suitable dock and storehouse facilities to be used in conjunction with the operation of research and experimental fishing vessels and for the procurement and for the modification, refitting, and equipment of two experimental high-sea fishing vessels, together with all necessary gear and appurtenances, and of one multiple purpose high-seas fishing and oceanographical research vessel, together with all necessary gear and appurtenances, including necessary naval architectural and engineering services: Provided, however, That no part of said appropriation shall be expended for the acquisition of lands for sites for said laboratory, experiment station, or substations in the State of Hawaii: Provided further, That there are authorized to be transferred to the Secretary of Commerce not to exceed three surplus vessels suitable for conversion and use in oceanographic and biological research and exploratory fishing, by any disposal agency of the Government without reimbursement or transfer of funds.

(Aug. 4, 1947, ch. 451, §4, 61 Stat. 726; Pub. L. 86–624, §11(d), July 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 412; 1970 Reorg. Plan No. 4, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1960—Pub. L. 86–624 substituted "State of Hawaii" for "Hawaiian Islands" and for "Territory of Hawaii".

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Transfer of functions to Secretary of Commerce from Secretary of the Interior by Reorg. Plan No. 4 of 1970, see note set out under section 758a of this title.
# C_2007096EN.01002402.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/24

---

Order of the Court of 8 March 2007 — Guido Strack v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-237/06 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Staff cases - Decision to close an OLAF investigation - Allegations of fraud made by an official - Locus standi of the official)

(2007/C 96/43)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant(s): Guido Strack (represented by: L. Füllkrug, Rechtsanwalt)

Applicant(s):

Other party/parties to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: H. Kraemer and C. Ladenburger, as Agents)

Other party/parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal brought against the Order of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 22 March 2006 in Case T-4/05 Strack v Commission by which the Court dismissed as inadmissible an action seeking, first, annulment of OLAF's decision to close an investigation initiated after allegations of fraud made by the appellant, and of the final report of the investigation, and, second, re-initiation of that investigation and the drawing up of a new final report — Meaning of ‘act adversely affecting an official ’in the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities — Obligation to refer the case to the Civil Service Staff Tribunal

Strack

Commission

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Strack is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Strack is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 15.7.2006.

1

---
§ 636.204 What items may be included in a phase-one solicitation? You may consider including the following items in any phase-one solicitation: ( a ) The scope of work;
( b ) The phase-one evaluation factors and their relative weights, including: ( 1 ) Technical approach (but not detailed design or technical information);
( 2 ) Technical qualifications, such as— ( i ) Specialized experience and technical competence;
( ii ) Capability to perform (including key personnel); and
( iii ) Past performance of the members of the offeror's team (including the architect-engineer and construction members);
( 3 ) Other appropriate factors (excluding cost or price related factors, which are not permitted in phase-one);
( c ) Phase-two evaluation factors; and
( d ) A statement of the maximum number of offerors that will be short listed to submit phase-two proposals.