FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P E A LS E LE V EN T HC IR C U IT MAY 17 , 2006 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 02- 10168

________________________ D . C . D ocketN o. 99 -000 12 -C V -J E G -6 T O N Y G O O D M A N , P la in tif f - A p p e lla n t, v ersu s O . T . R A Y , e t a l., D e f e n d a n ts , T H E S T A T E O F G E O R G I A , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lle e , U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , I n te r v e n o r .

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e r n D is tr ic t o f G e o r g ia

_________________________ ( M ay 17, 2006) B efo re C A RN E S , H U L L an d H IL L , C i rcu i tJu d g es.See Title IIof the America ns with Disabiliti es Ac t, 42 U.S.C. § 12131 et seq. (the 1 “ADA ”). 2 O N R EM A N D FR O M TH E SU PR EM E C O U R T O F TH E U N I TED STA TES P E R C U R I A M: T hi s c as e i s now before thi s C ou rton re m and from the U ni t ed S t at es S u p r e m e C o u r t a s s e t f

o r th in U n ite d S ta te s v . G e o r g ia , 5 4 6 U .S . ___ , 1 2 6 S . C t. 877 ( 2006) . T he pr oc e dur a l hi s t or y of thi s c a s e i s di s c us s e d a tl e ngth i n the S u p r e m e C o u r t’s d e c is io n . I d . a t _

__ , 1 2 6 S . C t. a t 8 7 9 - 8 0 . I n lig h t o f

th e S u p r e m e C o u r t’s r e v e r s a l o f th is C o u r t’s f

in a l ju d g m e n t in th is c a s e , w e va c a t e i n f

ul l ( 1) ourpr i oropi ni on i n G oodm a n v. R a y , N o. 02- 10168 ( 11th C i r . S e pt . 16, 2004) ; ( 2) the di s tr i c tc our t ’ s A ugus t20, 1999 or de rdi s m i s s i ng G oodm a n’ s E i ghth a nd F our t e e nth A m e ndm e ntc l a i m s unde r42 U . S . C . § 1983 a ga i ns ta l l de f

e nda nt s a nd di s m i s s i ng G oodm a n’ s c l a i m s unde rT i t l e I I of the A D A agai nstce rt ai n d ef endant s butno tas t o o ther defe nd ant s; (3) the di stri ct 1 co u rt ’ s M arch 1 6 , 2 0 0 0 o rd er d en yi n g G o o d m an ’ s an d th e rem ai n i n g d efen d an t s’ m ot i ons f

ors um m a r y j udgm e nta s t o G oodm a n’ s A D A c l a i m s ; a nd ( 4) the m a gi s tr a t e j udge ’ s D e c e m be r20, 2001 or de rgr a nt i ng s um m a r y j udgm e ntt o the r e m a in in g d e f

e n d a n ts a s to G o o d m a n ’s A D A c la im s . W e r e m a n d th is c a s e to th e d is tr ic t c o u r t w ith in s tru c tio n s to p e r m it G o o d m a n to a m e n d h is c o m p la in t a n d th e n f o rf u r th e rp r o c e e d in g s c o n s is te n t w ithGo od man f ile d h is c omp laint s p ro seand remaine d p ro seuntilthi s Co ur t a pp ointe d h im 2 pro b on o c ouns e l on

a pp e a l. C ou

ns e l ha s a dv ise d th is C ourt tha t c ouns e l is wi llingto c ontin ueto represent Goodma

n on rema nd in the district court, and thus the district cour t should enter an appointment order

on rema nd. We do not express a

ny opinion about the merits of Goodman’ s claims or as to what 3 pers on or e nti ty is theprop e r de fend ant o n G oo dma n’ s re mainingc laims . Wele avea ll o f t ho se issues to be dec ided by

the district court in the fir st instance. 3 the S up re m e C ou rt ’ s dec i si on . In hi s a m ended com pl ai nt , G oo dm an shal l spec i fy i n s e pa r a t e c ount s ( 1) w ha ts pe c i f i c c onduc the a l l e ge s vi ol a t e s the E i ghth a nd F ou rt ee nt h A m endm ent s a nd i s a ct i on abl e und er42 U . S . C . § 1 98 3; (2) t o w hat ex t en tth e al l eg ed co n d u ctu n d erl yi n g G o o d m an ’ s co n st i tu t i o n al cl ai m s al so vi ol at es T i t l e I I of the A D A ; (3) w hatspec i fi c c on du ct , i f a ny, al l egedl y vi ol at es T i t l e II o f th e A D A b u td o es n o tv i o l at e th e E i g h th an d F o u rt een th A m en d m en t s; a nd ( 4) w ha tna m e d de f e nda nt s a r e s ue d unde r§ 1983, T i t l e I I of the A D A , or bo th, and i n w hatcapaci ty e ac h n am ed defendanti s s ued (such as , w hether i nd i vi du al l y or i n o ff

i ci al capaci ty) . S ee G eorgi a, 54 6 U . S . at___, 12 6 S . C t . at 882. 2 A f t e rG oodm a n f

i l e s hi s a m e nde d c om pl a i nti n the di s tr i c tc our t , the d efen d an t s sh al l b e g i v en a reaso n ab l e o p p o rtu n i ty t o fi l e n ew m o t i o n s t o d i sm i ss o rf o rs u m m a r y ju d g m e n t, w h ic h th e d is tr ic t c o u r t in th e f ir s t in s ta n c e s h a ll adj ud i ca t e c on si st entw i th t he S up re m e C ou rt ’ s dec i si on i n t hi s c as e. 3 VA C A TED a nd R EM A N D ED .