alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 702/2005

of 3 May 2005         

establishing unit values for the determination of the customs value of certain perishable goods

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 (2) laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92, and in particular Article 173(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The unit values provided for in Article 173(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 are hereby established as set out in the table in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 6 May 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 May 2005.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN            

Vice-President

----

(1)OJ L 302, 19.10.1992, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2700/2000 (OJ L 311, 12.12.2000, p. 17).

(2)OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2286/2003 (OJ L 343, 31.12.2003, p. 1).

----

ANNEX

----
# Official Journal C 371A/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.371.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 371A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5618 December 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.371.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 371A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5618 December 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Medicines Agency |
| 2013/C 371A/01 | Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Medicines Agency

2013/C 371A/01

Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London)

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 27 | (RO) |
| 29 | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | |
| 36 | (DA) |
| 41 | (BG) |
| 43 | (EN) |
| 49 | (ET) |
| 50 | (HU) |
| 51 | (SL) |
| 54 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 58 | (EN/GA) |
| 75 | |
| 81 | |
| 82 | |
| 88 | (BG) |
| 89 | (CS) |
| 94 | |
| 104 | |
| 109 | |
| 111 | |
| 112 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 117 | (ET) |
| 118 | |
| 120 | |
| 131 | |
| 143 | |
| 160 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 162 | |
| 166 | |
| 167 | |
| 168 | |
| 172 | |
| 173 | |
| 174 | |
| 176 | (BG/DE/EN/ET/FI/IT/LT/LV/MT/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV) |
| 180 | (MT) |
| 182 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 183 | (IT) |
| 191 | |
| 192 | |
| 193 | |
| 194 | |
| 196 | |
| 197 | |
| 199 | |
| 200 | |
| 204 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 210 | (LV) |
| 211 | (PL) |
| 219 | |
| 227 | |
| 231 | |
| 235 | |
| 240 | |
| 264 | |
| 269 | |
| 276 | |
| 277 | |
| 279 | (PT) |
| 286 | (ET) |
| 289 | |
| 290 | |
| 292 | (SK) |
| 293 | (EN) |
| 294 | (DE) |
| 295 | (DA) |
| 299 | |
| 300 | (LT) |
| 301 | |
| 302 | |
| 308 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 309 | |
| 310 | |
| 317 | |
| 320 | |
| 321 | |
| 322 | |
| 335 | |
| 339 | |
| 346 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 347 | (GA) |
| 354 | (PT) |
| 355 | |
| 357 | |
| 361 | |
| 363 | |
| 368 | |
| 371 | |

5

27

(RO)

29

33

34

36

(DA)

41

(BG)

43

(EN)

49

(ET)

50

(HU)

51

(SL)

54

(DE/EN/FR)

58

(EN/GA)

75

81

82

88

(BG)

89

(CS)

94

104

109

111

112

(DE/EN/FR)

117

(ET)

118

120

131

143

160

(DE/EN/FR)

162

166

167

168

172

173

174

176

(BG/DE/EN/ET/FI/IT/LT/LV/MT/NL/PL/PT/SK/SL/SV)

180

(MT)

182

(DE/EN/FR)

183

(IT)

191

192

193

194

196

197

199

200

204

(DE/EN/FR)

210

(LV)

211

(PL)

219

227

231

235

240

264

269

276

277

279

(PT)

286

(ET)

289

290

292

(SK)

293

(EN)

294

(DE)

295

(DA)

299

300

(LT)

301

302

308

(DE/EN/FR)

309

310

317

320

321

322

335

339

346

(DE/EN/FR)

347

(GA)

354

(PT)

355

357

361

363

368

371

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Manouch Moshayedi*,*certify that: 

 

1.I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended June 30, 2004 of SimpleTech, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986] 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 13, 2004
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Micro
Laboratories, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert Thistle, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.

/s/Robert Thistle
-----------------------------
Robert Thistle
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer

August 19, 2003
Exhibit 32.2     DAC TECHNOLOGIES GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) ORRULE 15d-14(c) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of DAC Technologies Group InternationalInc (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Robert C. Goodwin, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.     /s/     Robert C. Goodwin, CFO, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer   Date: August 14, 2007
### §460nnn–3. Protection of tribal rights

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to diminish the rights of any Indian tribe. Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to diminish tribal rights, including those of the Burns Paiute Tribe, regarding access to Federal lands for tribal activities, including spiritual, cultural, and traditional food gathering activities.

(Pub. L. 106–399, §5, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1658.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 106–399, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1655, known as the Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Act of 2000, which is classified generally to this subchapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 460nnn of this title and Tables.
§ 660.105 Planning and route designation. ( a ) The FS will provide resource planning and related transportation information to the appropriate MPO and/or State Highway Agency (SHA) for use in developing metropolitan and statewide transportation plans pursuant to the provisions of part 450 of this title. Cooperators shall provide various planning (23 U.S.C. 134 and 135) information to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for coordination with the FS.
( b ) The management systems required under 23 U.S.C. 303 shall fulfill the requirement in 23 U.S.C. 204(a) regarding the establishment and implementation of pavement, bridge, and safety management systems for FHs. The results of bridge management systems and safety management systems on all FHs and results of pavement management systems for FHs on Federal-aid highways are to be provided by the SHAs for consideration in the development of programs under § 660.109 of this part. The FHWA will provide appropriate pavement management results for FHs which are not Federal-aid highways.
( c ) The FHWA, in consultation with the FS, the SHA, and other cooperators where appropriate, will designate FHs. ( 1 ) The SHA and the FS will nominate forest roads for FH designation.
( 2 ) The SHA will represent the interests of all cooperators. All other agencies shall send their proposals for FHs to the SHA.
( d ) A FH will meet the following criteria: ( 1 ) Generally, it is under the jurisdiction of a public authority and open to public travel, or a cooperator has agreed, in writing, to assume jurisdiction of the facility and to keep the road open to public travel once improvements are made.
( 2 ) It provides a connection between adequate and safe public roads and the resources of the NFS which are essential to the local, regional, or national economy, and/or the communities, shipping points, or markets which depend upon those resources.
( 3 ) It serves: ( i ) Traffic of which a preponderance is generated by use of the NFS and its resources; or
( ii ) NFS-generated traffic volumes that have a substantial impact on roadway design and construction; or
( iii ) Other local needs such as schools, mail delivery, commercial supply, and access to private property within the NFS.
#### Mark CRICHLOW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KINGSBROOK JEWISH MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 98-9593.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 14, 2002.

Mark Crichlow pro se, Jamaica, NY, for Appellant.

Steven B. Prystowsky, Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, N.Y., NY, for Appellee.

Present FEINBERG, KEARSE and CARDAMONE, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, and was argued by plaintiff *pro se*and by counsel for defendant.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed. *32Plaintiff Mark Crichlow appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Frederic Block, *Judge,*dismissing his complaint following a jury verdict against him on his claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e *et seq.*On appeal, Crichlow does not suggest that there was any error in the conduct of the trial, but rather contends that the district court erred in fading to rule on, and to grant, his pretrial motion for summary judgment. Finding no merit in his contentions, we affirm.

Although in addressing the parties’ respective pretrial motions for summary judgment the district court did not expressly state that it was denying Crichlow’s motion, the court implicitly denied that motion when it stated that there were genuine issues of material fact to be tried and when it scheduled trial. There was no failure to rule. Nor was the court’s decision incorrect, for the record did not permit the conclusion that Crichlow was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Crichlow’s contention that he is entitled to judgment because the district court ruled that he had adduced sufficient evidence to make out a prima facie case is mistaken. Regardless of the initial presumptions created by the presentation of a prima facie case, “ ‘[t]he ultimate burden of persuading the trier of fact that the defendant intentionally discriminated against the plaintiff remains at all times with the plaintiff.’ ” *St. Mary’s Honor Center v. Hicks,*509 U.S. 502, 507, 113 S.Ct. 2742, 125 L.Ed.2d 407 (1993) (quoting *Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine,*450 U.S. 248, 253, 101 S.Ct. 1089, 67 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981)); *see also St. Mary’s Honor Center v. Hicks,*509 U.S. at 511, 113 S.Ct. 2742 (“[A] presumption does not shift the burden of proof[;] ... the Title VII plaintiff at all times bears the ultimate burden of persuasion.” (internal quotation marks omitted)). In this case, the trier of fact, the jury, found against Crichlow. We see no basis for reversal.

We have considered all of Crichlow’s contentions on this appeal and have found them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
§ 100.12 Effect on other regulations; forms and instructions. ( a ) *Effect on other regulations.* All regulations, orders, or like directions heretofore issued by any officer of the Department which impose requirements designed to prohibit any discrimination against individuals on the ground of race, color, or national origin under any program to which this regulation applies, and which authorize the suspension or termination of or refusal to grant or to continue Federal financial assistance to any applicant for or recipient of assistance for failure to comply with such requirements, are hereby superseded to the extent that such discrimination is prohibited by this regulation, except that nothing in this regulation shall be deemed to relieve any person of any obligation assumed or imposed under any such superseded regulation, order, instruction, or like direction prior to the effective date of this regulation. Nothing in this regulation, however, shall be deemed to supersede any of the following (including future amendments thereof): ( 1 ) Executive Order 11063 and regulations issued thereunder, or any other regulations or instructions, insofar as such Order, regulations, or instructions prohibit discrimination on the ground of race, color, or national origin in any program or situation to which this regulation is inapplicable, or prohibit discrimination on any other ground; or
( 2 ) Requirements for Emergency School Assistance as published in 35 FR 13442 and codified as 34 CFR part 280.
( b ) *Forms and instructions.* The responsible Department official shall issue and promptly make available to interested persons forms and detailed instructions and procedures for effectuating this part.
( c ) *Supervision and coordination.* The responsible Department official may from time to time assign to officials of the Department, or to officials of other departments or agencies of the Government with the consent of such departments or agencies, responsibilities in connection with the effectuation of the purposes of title VI of the Act and this regulation (other than responsibility for review as provided in § 100.10(e)), including the achievements of effective coordination and maximum uniformity within the Department and within the Executive Branch of the Government in the application of title VI and this regulation to similar programs and in similar situations. Any action taken, determination made, or requirement imposed by an official of another Department or Agency acting pursuant to an assignment of responsibility under this section shall have the same effect as though such action had been taken by the responsible official of this Department.
(Authority: Sec. 602, Civil Rights Act of 1964; 78 Stat. 252; 42 U.S.C. 2000d-1)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

N ovember 22 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk November 22 , 2019

1 60019 & ( 4 4 )

BACK IN MOTIO N CHIROPRACTIC, DC,

PLLC

, Plaintiff

- Appellee

, SC: 1 60019

v COA: 3 4 1886

Oakland CC: 17

- 002778

- NF

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE

INSURANCE COMPANY

Defendant

- Appell ant

.

________ ____________________________ ___/

On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs

. The

motion to hold the case in abeyan ce is denied as moot.
01/25/201 1 17:4 1 FAX202493514 2 FA A + DM S @|001/00 3

Michae l Selig , MD , FACC , CFI- H 281 6 0refiel d Roa d Allentown , PA . 18104 

# E l !>-' 7 \< o

U.S . DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O F HEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C . Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Laur a Ponto , Lotony o William s Complainant s M i R Helicopters , LLC . Responden t >

Honorabl e Judg e Ronni e Yode r Docl<et : 2010-121 1

MOTIO N T

O HAV E DEPOSITIO N O F LATONY AWILLIAM S I N TH E ALLENTOWN . PA . LOCATIO N AN D NOW , come s respondent , MICHAE LB . SELIG , MD , FACC , principl e fo rM R Helicopters , LLC , (MRH ) (non-operationa l sinc e 2007 ) who m aver s an d file s th e followin g Repl yt o matter s pertainin g t o th e Depositio n o fLatony a William s unde rRul e §13.22 5 a tth e U.S . Distric tCour tlocate d a t50 4 w , Hamilto n Street , Allentown , P

A18101 . 1 . O n Decembe r1 , 2010 , responden tfaxe d an d file d a Motio n fo r Depositio n o fLatony a William s t o M s Ponto , t o tak e plac e a t th e U S DistrictCour t i n Allentown , PA . 2 . Complainant s faile d t o respon d t o th e motio n withi n th e 1 0 da y deadline . 1 o f30J^5/201 1 17:4 1 FA X202493514 2 FA A* DM S i002/00 3

3 . Th e complainant s agree d l o mok e availabl e M rWilliam s fo r Depositio n i n M rPonte s response , receive d b yresponden to n Decembe r20 , 2010 . 4 . Th e meetin g plac e o fWashingto n D C an d time s se tfort h ar e no t acceptabl e an d no tagree d upo n b yth e respondent . 5 . Th e meetin g plac e shoul d b e a tth e plac e wher e M s William s cam e t o inspec tan d t o initiat e th e violatio n whic h wa s Lehig h valle yPa - wher e ther e i s convenientl ylocate d th e U.S . DistrictCour tlocate d a t50 4 W . Hamilto n Street , Allentown , P

A1810 1 jus tminute s away . 6 . M s William s standar d practic e is t o trave l t o remot e location s t o perfor m inspections , impos e Civi l Penaltie s agains tOperator s an d come s t o Allentow n regularly ; therefor e i twoul d no tb e a n inconvenienc e t o he rt o com e onc e agai n t o th e Allentow n area . 7 . Responden twh o i

s a cardiologis t an d ha s a sol o privat e practic e shoul d no tb e burdene d o rinconvenienc e fo ra violatio n tha th e di d no tinitiat e an d tha tappear s t o lac k lega l merit . 8 . Responden twh o is a cardiologis tan d ha s a sol o privat e practic e shoul d no tb e aske d t o compromis e hi s clinica l responsibilitie s i n hi s offic e o rth e hospita l i n a manne rtha twoul d dela yan d compromis e patien tcar e an d potentiall ypos e increas e liabilities t o hi m i n hi s rol e o fprovidin g hi s publi chealt h car e service s t o th e community . 9 . Th e Depositio n shoul d b e require d t o b e a tth e 50 4 W . Hamilto n 2 o f301/25/201 1 17:4 1 FAX202483514 2 FA A• > DMS @|003/00 3

Street , Allentown , P

Alocation , WHEREFORE , th e responden tpray s tha tthi s Honorabl e Cour twil l gran t th e depositio n o fLatony a William s a tth e Allentown , P Alocation . Respectfull ySubmitted , Michae l B. Selig , MD , FAC C rV'^ • Dat e \y'^- ^ ^

3 o f3
- Newsroom        - Press Releases
      - Public Statements
      - Speeches
      - Testimony
      - Spotlight Topics
      - Media Gallery
      - Upcoming Events
      - Webcasts
      - What's New
      - SEC Videos
      - Reports and Publications
      - RSS Feeds
      - Social Media 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

**TIME AND DATE:**  Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, July 22, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.

**PLACE:** The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission’s headquarters, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549.

**STATUS:**  This meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public via audio webcast only on the Commission’s website at www.sec.gov.

**MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:**  The subject matter of the Open Meeting will be the Commission’s continued efforts to enhance transparency, improve disclosures, and increase confidence in the proxy process. The specific matters to be considered are:

- Whether to adopt proxy rule amendments to provide investors who use proxy voting advice with more transparent, accurate, and complete information on which to make voting decisions, without imposing undue costs or delays. 
- Whether to provide further guidance to investment advisers regarding how the fiduciary duty and rule 206(4)-6 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 relate to an investment adviser’s proxy voting on behalf of clients, through publication of supplementary guidance to the Commission Guidance Regarding Proxy Voting Responsibilities of Investment Advisers, Release No. IA-5325 (Aug. 21, 2019), 84 FR 47420 (Sept. 10, 2019).

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:** For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman, Office of the Secretary, at (202) 551-5400.

Dated:  July 15, 2020

Vanessa A. CountrymanSecretary