alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1





The following certification accompanies North Bay Bancorps Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and is not filed as provided in SEC Release Nos.  33-8212, 34-47551 and IC 25967, dated March 21, 2003.



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q  of North Bay Bancorp for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, I, Terry L. Robinson, President and Chief Executive Officer of North Bay Bancorp, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  that:



1.

such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of North Bay Bancorp for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of North Bay Bancorp for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of North Bay Bancorp.





Dated:    August 8, 2006



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Terry L. Robinson                
|TERRY L. ROBINSON                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)        
|
### §460nnn–12. Purpose and objectives of Cooperative Management and Protection Area

#### (a) Purpose

The purpose of the Cooperative Management and Protection Area is to conserve, protect, and manage the long-term ecological integrity of Steens Mountain for future and present generations.

#### (b) Objectives

To further the purpose specified in subsection (a), and consistent with such purpose, the Secretary shall manage the Cooperative Management and Protection Area for the benefit of present and future generations—

(1) to maintain and enhance cooperative and innovative management projects, programs and agreements between tribal, public, and private interests in the Cooperative Management and Protection Area;

(2) to promote grazing, recreation, historic, and other uses that are sustainable;

(3) to conserve, protect and to ensure traditional access to cultural, gathering, religious, and archaeological sites by the Burns Paiute Tribe on Federal lands and to promote cooperation with private landowners;

(4) to ensure the conservation, protection, and improved management of the ecological, social, and economic environment of the Cooperative Management and Protection Area, including geological, biological, wildlife, riparian, and scenic resources; and

(5) to promote and foster cooperation, communication, and understanding and to reduce conflict between Steens Mountain users and interests.

(Pub. L. 106–399, title I, §102, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1658.)
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4917 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to conduct a study on the renovation, 

repair, or expansion needs of certain elementary schools and secondary 

schools that educate dependants of active duty military personnel. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 30, 2019 

Ms. GABBARD (for herself, Mr. KIM, Mr. COOK, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. 

MOULTON, Mr. PANETTA, Mr. ROUZER, and Ms. KENDRA S. HORN of 

Oklahoma) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor, and in addition to the Committee on 

Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to conduct a study on 

the renovation, repair, or expansion needs of certain elementary schools and secondary schools that educate dependants of active duty military personnel. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Survey Our Military 

5 Impacted Schools Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4917 IH

1 SEC. 2. STUDY AND REPORT ON CONSTRUCTION GRANT 

2 PROGRAM. 

3 Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 

4 of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with 

5 the heads of any other relevant agencies, shall conduct a 

6 study and submit a report on such study to Congress on 

7 the unmet capital improvement needs (including renova8 tion, repair, or expansion needs) of each elementary school 

9 and secondary school— 

10 (1) in which the total student enrollment for 

11 the most recent school year was not less than 150 

12 students; 

13 (2) that is not located within the boundaries of 

14 a Federal military installation; and 

15 (3) that is served by a local educational agen16 cy— 

17 (A) in which at least 15 percent, but not 

18 more than 40 percent, of the total student en19 rollment for the most recent school year in 

20 schools of the agency were children described in 

21 subparagraphs (B) and (D)(i) of section 

22 7003(a)(1) of the Elementary and Secondary 

23 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7703(a)(1)); 

24 and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4917 IH

1 (B) that is eligible for assistance under 

2 title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Edu3 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
### §460n–9. Authorization of appropriations

There are hereby authorized to be appropriated not more than $7,100,000 for the acquisition of land and interests in land pursuant to section 460n–1 of this title.

(Pub. L. 88–639, §10, Oct. 8, 1964, 78 Stat. 1041; Pub. L. 93–477, title I, §101(12), Oct. 26, 1974, 88 Stat. 1445.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1974—Pub. L. 93–477 substituted "$7,100,000" for "$1,200,000".
### §580h. Range improvements from appropriated funds

Of the moneys received from grazing fees by the Treasury from each national forest during each fiscal year there shall be available at the end thereof when appropriated by Congress an amount equivalent to 2 cents per animal-month for sheep and goats and 10 cents per animal-month for other kinds of livestock under permit on such national forest during the calendar year in which the fiscal year begins, which appropriated amount shall be available until expended on such national forest, under such regulations as the Secretary of Agriculture may prescribe, for (1) artificial revegetation, including the collection or purchase of necessary seed; (2) construction and maintenance of drift or division fences and stock-watering places, bridges, corrals, driveways, or other necessary range improvements; (3) control of range-destroying rodents; or (4) eradication of poisonous plants and noxious weeds, in order to protect or improve the future productivity of the range.

(Apr. 24, 1950, ch. 97, §12, 64 Stat. 85.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Savings Provision

Provisions of Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, Pub. L. 94–579, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2743, not to be construed as affecting the distribution of livestock grazing revenues to local governments under this section, see section 701(j) of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of Title 43, Public Lands.
#### Northern New York Power Corporation, Respondent, v. State of New York, Appellant.

(Claim No. 726-A.)

Present—Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and MeCnrn, JJ.
### §450bb–3. Acquisition of additional lands

To further the commemorative purposes of sections 450bb to 450bb–2 of this title, by providing historic properties and administrative facilities, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to acquire, in the manner hereafter stated, the Storer College site, the original site of John Brown's "Fort" and the old Federal armory, comprising altogether approximately thirty acres, for addition to Harpers Ferry National Historical Park.

(Pub. L. 86–655, §1, July 14, 1960, 74 Stat. 520; Pub. L. 88–33, May 29, 1963, 77 Stat. 52.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Harpers Ferry National Historical Park" substituted in text for "Harpers Ferry National Monument" in view of redesignation of Harpers Ferry National Monument as Harpers Ferry National Historical Park by Pub. L. 88–33, classified to section 450bb–6 of this title.
#### Frank A. Gage v. Clara E. West.

Filed October 1, 1901.

No. 10,083.

I. Amendment of Pleading: Judicial Discretion. The granting or refusing of amendment of pleadings is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court.

3. -: Abuse of Discretion. It is an abuse of discretion to refuse the amendment of a pleading tendered in the furtherance of justice.

Error from the district court for Grant county. Tried below before Kendall, J.

*Reversed.*

*William Mitchell,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. G. Porter*and *G. L. G-utterson, contra.*

Norval, C. J.

Frank A. Gage commenced an action to replevy certain cattle from Clara E. West, who, in her answer, alleged that she had taken the cattle under a chattel mortgage given by Gage to her to secure a promissory note of his. In reply. Gage admitted the execution and delivery of the note and mortgage, but alleged a failure of consideration, *613for the reason that the consideration for which they were given was the promise of said Clara to marry him, which promise she had failed to perform, bnt had married another man. The reply was inartistically drawn, but no attempt to assail it for insufficiency was made until the trial, when objection was made and sustained to the introduction of testimony tending to prove the allegations. Plaintiff asked leave of court to amend the reply, which request was refused, and a verdict was rendered in favor of defendant. From the judgment rendered thereon plaintiff comes here on error.

The court below abused its discretion in refusing to permit plaintiff to amend his reply. It is the settled law of this state that the power to permit or refuse amendments of pleadings is discretionary with the trial court; but this is a legal discretion which may be abused when an amendment is refused which is clearly in furtherance of justice. *Mills v. Miller,*3 Nebr., 87, 95; *O’Dea v. Washington County,*3 Nebr., 118, 122; *Berrer v. Moorhead,*22 Nebr., 687, 692. The amendment offered falls clearly within the principle announced in these and many other cases decided by this court. The judgment is therefore reversed and the case remanded with leave to plaintiff to amend his reply and for further proceedings.

Reversed.

Sullivan, J., absent, not voting.
#### In the Matter of Thomas K. Coyne against William Wilson, as Commissioner of the Department of Housing and Buildings of the City of New York, et al.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

366 

CAF 16-00454 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

 

IN THE MATTER OF JASON L. ROHR, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, 

 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BARBARA L. YOUNG, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, 

AND AIMEE ROHR, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

PALOMA A. CAPANNA, WEBSTER, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

CONBOY, MCKAY, BACHMAN & KENDALL, LLP, WATERTOWN (MATTHEW J. PORTER OF

COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. 

LISA WELDON, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, WATERTOWN. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Jefferson County

(Eugene J. Langone, Jr., J.), entered March 18, 2016 in a proceeding

pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other

things, directed that respondent Barbara L. Young shall have

supervised visitation with the subject children one Saturday per month

for two hours. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent-appellant grandmother appeals from an

order that, inter alia, modified a prior order entered on consent by

changing the grandmother’s one-hour biweekly supervised therapeutic

visitation with the two teenaged children to one supervised two-hour

visit per month in a public place. Family Court denied petitioner

father’s petition insofar as it requested that the visitation be

terminated. We reject the grandmother’s contention that the father

failed to establish that there was a sufficient change in

circumstances to warrant consideration of the best interests of the

children. The 15-year-old child testified that she did not wish to

visit with her grandmother and, although “ ‘not dispositive, the

express wishes of older and more mature children can support the

finding of a change in circumstances’ ” (Matter of Rulinsky v West,

107 AD3d 1507, 1508). Furthermore, the Court Attorney Referee was

entitled to credit the testimony of the father and the child that the

children had difficulty completing homework on the days that both

extracurricular activities and the therapeutic visits were scheduled

(see generally Matter of Jones v Laird, 119 AD3d 1434, 1434-1435, lv

denied 24 NY3d 908). Contrary to the grandmother’s contention, the
-2- 366 

CAF 16-00454 

determination of the court that it was in the best interests of the

children to modify the visitation schedule has a sound and substantial

basis in the record (see Matter of Stilson v Stilson, 93 AD3d 1222,

1223), and we note in any event that the “modified schedule has no

meaningful adverse impact on the [grandmother’s] interests” (Gardner v

Korthals, 130 AD3d 1468, 1469). 

Entered: March 24, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### Dennis ACCARDO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LONG ISLAND RAILROAD, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 01-7679.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 10, 2002.

Steven L. Kantor, Esq., Williamsville, NY, for Appellant.

William J. Blumschein, Long Island Rail Road Law Department, Jamaica, NY, for Appellee.

Present McLAUGHLIN, PARKER, and SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the appeal from the district court’s denial of appellant’s motion for new trial be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Dennis Accardo filed this action against his former employer pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51, et. seq., based on injuries sustained to his right hand and shoulder while operating a crane and T-bar mechanism used to lift motor alternators in the Long Island Rail Road’s Hillside Maintenance Complex. After the jury returned a verdict for the defense, Accardo sought a new trial. The district court denied the motion, finding none of Accardo’s claims sufficient to indicate that the jury’s verdict was a “seriously erroneous result” or a “miscarriage of justice.” *See United States v. Landau,*155 F.3d 93, 104 (2d Cir.1998). Having reviewed Accardo’s claims on appeal, we find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the new trial motion. *See Luciano v. Olsten Corp.,*110 F.3d 210, 217 (2d Cir.1997).

For the reasons set forth above, the district court’s denial of Accardo’s motion for a new trial is AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

 

_________________ Division

In re 

 Case No. 

 Debtor(s) Chapter 

 

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DEBTOR’S 

CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH 11 U.S.C. § 1328 

 The above debtor(s) having filed a motion for extension of time to file Debtor’s 

Certification of Compliance with 11 U.S.C. § 1328, pursuant to Local Rule 4008-2, it is 

therefore

 ORDERED that the time for filing the Debtor’s Certification of Compliance with 

11 U.S.C. § 1328 is extended until ______________.1

 Failure to file the certification may 

result in the case being closed without an entry of a discharge order. 

Date ____________________ 

 _______________________________________ 

 United States Bankruptcy Judge 

NOTICE OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER 

 ENTERED ON DOCKET: ___________________

 

 

1

 Insert date that is 14 days from the date the Certification was originally due. 

[oext1328 ver.12/11] 

Richmond

Tonya Anne Darnell

17-35306-KRH

13

8/4/2020

Jul 24 2020

/s/ Kevin R. Huennekens

Jul 24 2020

Case 17-35306-KRH Doc 25 Filed 07/24/20 Entered 07/24/20 11:02:43 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
#### §§ 105.12-105.19 [Reserved]
#### Ben Grey, Respondent, v. Hugh S. Johnson, Defendant, and New York World-Telegram Corporation et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
# Official Journal L 253/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 253 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5727 August 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 253

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5727 August 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 925/2014 of 26 August 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 925/2014 of 26 August 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
**Exhibit 23.2**

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of Herley Industries, Inc. on Form S-8 [File numbers333-145503, 333-121554, 333-71476, 333-95327, 333-46777 and 333-17369] of our report dated October 4 2010, with respect to our audit of the consolidated financial statements of General Microwave Israel and Subsidiaries as of August 1, 2010and for the fifty-two (52) weeks ended August 1, 2010 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Herley Industries, Inc. for the fifty-two (52) weeks ended August 1, 2010. 

Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co. 

Certified Public Accountants 

A member firm ofDeloitte Touche Tohmatsu 

Tel Aviv, Israel 

October 14, 2010
**Exhibit 99.1**

 
| **PEC Solutions, Inc.** | **[PEC LOGO]** | 12730 Fair Lakes Circle |
|-------------------------|----------------|-------------------------|
|                    |           | Fairfax, VA 22003       |
|                    |           | 703-679-4900 voice      |
|                    |           | 703-679-4901 facsimile  |
|                    |           | www.pec.com             |

 

**Certification ofPrincipal Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350**

**(Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

I, DavidC. Karlgaard, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executiveofficer) of PEC Solutions, Inc. (the “Registrant”), certify that to thebest of my knowledge, based upon review of the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2003 of the Registrant(the “Report”):

 
| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  [15(d)] of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                    |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                      |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Registrant. |

 
| /s/  David C. Karlgaard |               |
|------------------------------|--------------------|
| Name:                        | David C. Karlgaard |   |
| Date:                        | May 14, 2003       |   |

 

----
§ 660.503 Objectives. The defense access roads program provides a means by which the Federal Government may pay its fair share of the cost of: ( a ) Highway improvements needed for adequate highway service to defense and defense related installations;
( b ) New highways to replace those which must be closed to permit establishment or expansion of defense installations;
( c ) Repair of damage to highways caused by major military maneuvers;
( d ) Repair of damages due to the activities of contractors engaged in the construction of missile sites; and
( e ) Missile routes to ensure their continued ability to support the missile transporter-erector (TE) vehicle.
### §470mm. Surveying of lands; reporting of violations

The Secretaries of the Interior, Agriculture, and Defense and the Chairman of the Board of the Tennessee Valley Authority shall—

(a) develop plans for surveying lands under their control to determine the nature and extent of archeological resources on those lands;

(b) prepare a schedule for surveying lands that are likely to contain the most scientifically valuable archeological resources; and

(c) develop documents for the reporting of suspected violations of this chapter and establish when and how those documents are to be completed by officers, employees, and agents of their respective agencies.

(Pub. L. 96–95, §14, as added Pub. L. 100–555, Oct. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 2778.)
PRD Label Data Report: Food/Feed & Non-Food/Non-Feed Uses Considered in Registration Review Work Planning

Chemical (109709) Metofluthrin

Current As Of Date : 12/30/2011

Note: This is an aggregate report of registered uses for this chemical. Label data for chemicals with more than one pesticide product are presented in aggregate form (i.e. each line of data may be a combination of data from one or more pesticide).

Fo

o

d (F) /

N

on-fo

o

d

(N)

Use Site Formulation Desc

A. I. Max App 

Rate/App

Max # Apps / 

CC

A. I. Max 

App 

Rate/CC

Max # Apps / 

Year

A. I. Max App 

Rate/Year

Minimum 

Retreatment 

Interval

Minimum 

Reentry

Interval PGI / PHI / PSI Allow Geo Restrictions

DisAllow Geo 

Restrictions

N

HOUSEHOLD/DOMESTIC DWELLINGS OUTDOOR 

PREMISES IMPREGNATED MATERIAL NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS No Restrictions No Restrictions

N HUMAN BODY/CLOTHING WHILE BEING WORN IMPREGNATED MATERIAL NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS No Restrictions No Restrictions

N PATHS/PATIOS IMPREGNATED MATERIAL NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS No Restrictions No Restrictions

N RECREATIONAL AREAS IMPREGNATED MATERIAL NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS No Restrictions No Restrictions

CAA || CAS || CAT || CDA

CAA || CAS || CAT || CDA

Limitations

NDC - No Dosage Conversion ; NS - Not Specified

Limitation Code Limitation Description

C (AA) Do not apply to any body of water.

CAS || CAT || CDA

CAS || CAT || CDA

C (AS) Do not contaminate food or feed.

C (AT) Do not place in locations accessible to children, pets or domestic animals.

C (DA) Do not use indoors.

Each row of this report is determined by the unique combination of the food/nonfood indicator, use site, formulation, and maximum application rate per application (key 

columns). The remaining, non-key columns of the report display either worse case or aggregate data from the label information that defines the unique data row. Note that 

each non-key column does not necessarily relate to any other non-key column with in the same row.

Page 1 of 1