alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    
    /s/ Darl C. McBrideDarl C. McBridePresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    September 17, 2007
### §6852. Interagency data standardization

Not later than 30 months after April 29, 2022, the Secretaries shall jointly develop and adopt interagency standards to ensure compatibility and interoperability among applicable Federal databases with respect to the collection and dissemination of data—

(1) relating to public outdoor recreational use on Federal land; and

(2) used to depict locations at which recreation uses are available to the public.

(Pub. L. 117–114, §3, Apr. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 1175.)
385 P.2d 73

#### Carroll Wayne PARIS, Petitioner, v. The STATE of New Mexico et al., Respondents.

No. 38 HC.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Sept. 19, 1963.

COMPTON, Chief Justice, and CARMODY, CHAVEZ and NOBLE, Justices, concurring; MOISE, Justice, not participating.

Ordered that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be and the same is hereby denied for the reason the petition alleges no grounds for relief.
|   | 1. | I      am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Royal Energy      Resources, Inc. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Attached      to this certification is Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended February 28,      2009, a periodic report (the “periodic report”) filed by the issuer with      the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), which      contains condensed financialstatements. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | I      hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  that |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | The      periodic report containing the condensed financial statements fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange      Act, and |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | The      information in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations      of the issuer for the periodspresented. |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| December 7, 2009 | /s/      Jacob Roth              |   |
|------------------|----------------------------------|--------|
|             | Jacob      Roth                  |   |
|             | Chief      Executive Officer and |   |
|             | Chief      Financial Officer     |   |

----
(No. 81-CV-0339

#### *In re*Application of Adeline Weinstein, Executor of the Estate of Louis Cassel.

*Order filed January 24, 1983.*

Adeline Weinstein, *pro se,*for Claimant.

Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General (Lynn Rosenthal Mayer, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

Poch, J.

This claim arises out of an incident that occurred on • February 24, 1980. Adeline Weinstein, executor of the estate of the deceased victim, Louis Casselj seeks compensation. pursuant to the provisions of the Crime Victims Compensation Act. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch, 70, par. 71 *et seq.*

This claim was filed on or about October 24, 1980. Thereafter, based upon the investigatory report submit*1008ted by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois and the other documentary evidence, the Court on May 7, 1981, entered an order denying the application for compensation on the grounds that an estate is not eligible under the Act. Claimant filed her objections to said order and requested a hearing.

The hearing was conducted by commissioner Dennis M. Fleming, on the 30th day of August 1982, at Chicago, Illinois. As a result of said hearing, the following facts were stipulated:

Claimant is the daughter and executor of Louis Cassel, who was the innocent victim of a murder on the 24th day of February 1980.

The only issue before the Court is whether or not the estate can be reimbursed for the expenses; there is no question that all the other requirements for compensation have been met. As the victim’s daughter, the Claimant could have been reimbursed for reasonable funeral and medical expenses for the victim had she paid them herself. As sole heir of the decedent her inheritance was reduced by the amount of these expenses when they were paid by the estate.

In *In re Daill,*32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 1022, the Court held that, although estates are not specifically included among the class of potential beneficiaries under the Act, an estate may be eligible for benefits if it is shown that the person who would inherit the estate had a portion of their inheritance reduced by an amount they could have been reimbursed or compensated under the Act had they paid the amount themselves.

In the instant case, Adeline Weinstein, as the daughter of the deceased victim, would have been eligible for compensation for the funeral and medical expenses, and thus her inheritance has been reduced accordingly.

*1009Based on the reasoning in the *Daill*case, the order of May 7, 1981, is vacated and the Claimant is entitled to an award based on the following:

> Funeral expenses $2,000.00

> Medical expenses 269.76

> Total $2,269.76

It is hereby ordered that the sum of two thousand two hundred sixty nine and 76/100 ($2,269.76) dollars be and is awarded to Adeline Weinstein, executor of the estate of Louis Cassel, an innocent victim of a violent crime.
### §753a. Cooperative research and training programs for fish and wildlife resources

For the purpose of developing adequate, coordinated, cooperative research and training programs for fish and wildlife resources, the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Commerce, as appropriate, is authorized to continue to enter into cooperative agreements with colleges and universities, with game and fish departments of the several States, and with nonprofit organizations relating to cooperative research units: Provided, That Federal participation in the conduct of such cooperative unit programs shall be limited to the assignment of Department of the Interior or Department of Commerce scientific personnel by the Secretary to serve at the respective units, to the provision of assistance (including reasonable financial compensation) for the work of researchers on fish and wildlife ecology and resource management projects funded under this subsection 1 to supply for the use of the particular units' operations such equipment as may be available to the Secretary for such purposes, and the payment of incidental expenses of Federal personnel and employees of cooperating agencies assigned to the units.

(Pub. L. 86–686, §1, Sept. 2, 1960, 74 Stat. 733; 1970 Reorg. Plan No. 4, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090; Pub. L. 95–616, §2, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3110.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–616, in proviso, substituted "scientific personnel" for "technical personnel" and authorized provision of assistance (including reasonable financial compensation) for the work of researchers on funded fish and wildlife ecology and resource management projects.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Reference to Secretary of Commerce and Department of Commerce inserted in view of: creation of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Department of Commerce and Office of Administrator of such Administration; abolition of Bureau of Commercial Fisheries in Department of the Interior and Office of Director of such Bureau; transfers of functions, including functions formerly vested by law in Secretary of the Interior or Department of the Interior which were administered through Bureau of Commercial Fisheries or were primarily related to such Bureau, exclusive of certain enumerated functions with respect to Great Lakes fishery research, Missouri River Reservoir research, Gulf Breeze Biological Laboratory, and Trans-Alaska pipeline investigations; and transfer of marine sport fish program of Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife by Reorg. Plan No. 4 of 1970, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

1 So in original. Probably should be "section".
### §460v–5. Ashley National Forest; addition of lands of Flaming Gorge National Recreation Area

The boundaries of the Ashley National Forest are hereby extended to include all of the lands not presently within such boundaries lying within the recreation area as described in accordance with sections 460v and 460v–2 of this title.

(Pub. L. 90–540, §6, Oct. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 905.)
# C_2019383EN.01001802.xml

| 11.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 383/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) — Ireland) — Nalini Chenchooliah v Minister for Justice and Equality

(Case C-94/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Citizenship of the Union - Article 21 TFEU - Right of Union citizens and their family members to move and reside freely in the territory of a Member State - Directive 2004/38/EC - Article 3(1) and Articles 15, 27, 28, 30 and 31 - Definition of ‘beneficiary’ - Third-country national, the spouse of a Union citizen who has exercised his right to freedom of movement - Return of the Union citizen to the Member State of which he is a national, where he is serving a prison sentence - Requirements imposed on the host Member State under Directive 2004/38/EC when making a decision to remove such a third-country national)

(2019/C 383/18)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

High Court (Ireland)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Nalini Chenchooliah

Defendant: Minister for Justice and Equality

Operative part of the judgment

Article 15 of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC, is to be interpreted as being applicable to a decision to expel a third-country national on the ground that that person no longer has a right of residence under the directive in a situation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, where the third-country national concerned married a Union citizen at a time when that citizen was exercising his right to freedom of movement by moving to and residing with that third-country national in the host Member State and, subsequently, the Union citizen returned to the Member State of which he is a national. It follows that the relevant safeguards laid down in Articles 30 and 31 of Directive 2004/38 are applicable when such an expulsion decision is adopted and it is not possible, under any circumstances, for such a decision to impose a ban on entry into the territory.

---

(1)  OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.

---
### §5707. Continuation of Agreement

In the event that the Treaty between Canada and the United States of America concerning Pacific Salmon, signed at Ottawa, January 28, 1985, terminates prior to the termination of the Agreement, and the functions of the Panel are assumed by the "Yukon River Salmon Commission" referenced in the Agreement, the provisions of this subchapter which apply to the Panel shall thereafter apply to the Yukon River Salmon Commission, and the other provisions of this subchapter shall remain in effect.

(Pub. L. 104–43, title VII, §708, Nov. 3, 1995, 109 Stat. 394.)
### §824m. Sales by exempt wholesale generators

No rate or charge received by an exempt wholesale generator for the sale of electric energy shall be lawful under section 824d of this title if, after notice and opportunity for hearing, the Commission finds that such rate or charge results from the receipt of any undue preference or advantage from an electric utility which is an associate company or an affiliate of the exempt wholesale generator. For purposes of this section, the terms "associate company" and "affiliate" shall have the same meaning as provided in section 16451 of title 42.1

(June 10, 1920, ch. 285, pt. II, §214, as added Pub. L. 102–486, title VII, §724, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2920; amended Pub. L. 109–58, title XII, §1277(b)(2), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 978.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 16451 of title 42, referred to in text, was in the original "section 2(a) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005" and was translated as reading "section 1262" of that Act, meaning section 1262 of subtitle F of title XII of Pub. L. 109–58, to reflect the probable intent of Congress, because subtitle F of title XII of Pub. L. 109–58 does not contain a section 2 and section 1262 of subtitle F of title XII of Pub. L. 109–58 defines terms.

#### Amendments

2005—Pub. L. 109–58 substituted "section 16451 of title 42" for "section 79b(a) of title 15".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2005 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 109–58 effective 6 months after Aug. 8, 2005, with provisions relating to effect of compliance with certain regulations approved and made effective prior to such date, see section 1274 of Pub. L. 109–58, set out as an Effective Date note under section 16451 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

#### State Authorities; Construction

Nothing in this section to be construed as affecting or intending to affect, or in any way to interfere with, authority of any State or local government relating to environmental protection or siting of facilities, see section 731 of Pub. L. 102–486, set out as a note under section 796 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
#### Rosie Hass v. Brooklyn Union Elevated Railroad Company.

Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
# Official Journal C 2/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 2 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 645 January 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 2

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 645 January 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 2/01 | Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,00 % on 1 January 2021 — Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 2/01

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,00 % on 1 January 2021 — Euro exchange rates

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         I, David M. Sindelar, as Chief Executive Officer of Viasystems Group,
Inc. (the "Company") certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending September
30, 2002 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  November 14, 2002


                               /s/ David M. Sindelar
                               ---------------------------------------
                               David M. Sindelar
                               Chief Executive Officer
                               of the Company
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****From coverage to care: aroadmap to better care and a healthier you.**
 
Parts: 0102030405060708
 
SuDoc Number:HE 22.2:C 83/5/PT.1-8
Item Number:0512-A-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000936901
 
July 24, 2019
#### Nicholas J. WEBB, Claimant-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-7001.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 10, 2002.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Nicholas J. Webb appeals from a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”) denying reconsideration of an order of the Veterans Court granting remand of his case to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (“Board”). *Webb v. Principi,*15 Vet.App. 139 (2001). Because the appeal is not sufficiently final for the purposes of our review, we *dismiss*the appeal.

I

Webb appealed to the Veterans Court from an adverse decision by the Board on his claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for residuals of a cerebral hemorrhage. He challenged the legal adequacy of the Board’s assessment of pertinent medical evidence. While his appeal was pending before the Veterans Court, the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, Pub.L. No. 106-75, 114 Stat.2096 (“VCAA”) was enacted. On January 22, 2001, the Department of Veterans Affairs requested that the Veterans Court vacate the Board’s decision and remand Webb’s case to the Board pursuant to the VCAA. Webb agreed that vacating and remanding were appropriate, but argued that the Veterans Court should first decide the issues Webb presented in his appeal before remanding. The Veterans Court rejected Webb’s argument and denied his request for reconsideration of the order remanding his case to the Board. Webb then timely appealed to this court.

II

This court generally refuses to review nonfinal decisions of the Veterans Court. *Williams v. Principi,*275 F.3d 1361, 1363 (Fed.Cir.2002). Departure from this rule is justified only if three conditions are fulfilled:

> (1) there must have been a clear and final decision of a legal issue that (a) is separate from the remand proceedings, (b) will directly govern the remand proceedings or, (c) if reversed by this court, would render the remand proceedings unnecessary; (2) the resolution of the legal issues must adversely affect the party seeking review; and, (3) there must be a substantial risk that the decision would not survive a remand, *i.e.,*that the remand proceeding may moot the issue.

*Id.*at 1364 (footnotes omitted).

If errors are committed by the Board on remand, Webb will be free to return to the Veterans Court and challenge such errors. If the alleged previous errors are again committed by the Board, their review will survive the remand. In addition, Webb will be able to challenge the whole of the Board’s readjudication of his claim. Because Webb’s appeal fails the test of *Williams,*the appeal is not sufficiently *774final for purposes of our review and is therefore dismissed.

Each side shall bear its own costs.
Attorney or Party without Attorney: For Court Use Only

MICHAEL CRYAN

ARENT FOX LLP

55 SECOND STREET

21ST FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

 Telephone No: 415-757-5500

 Ref. No. or File No.:

 Attorney for:

 Insert name of Court, and Judicial District and Branch Court:

United States District Court For The Eastern District Of California

 Plaintiff: In Re The Matter Of

 Defendant: B&B ALEXANDRIA CORPORATE PARK TIC, LLC.

PROOF OF SERVICE Hearing Date: Time: Dept/Div: Case Number:

SUBPOENA Fri, Aug. 07, 2015 1:00PM USBC EDVA 15-12361-BFK

1. At the time of service I was at least 18 years of age and not a party to this action.

2. I served copies of the SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY AT A DEPOSITION IN A CIVIL ACTION

3. a. Party served: CHERYL MILLER

4. Address where the party was served: 13693 FERN ROAD EAST 

WHITMORE, CA 96096

5. I served the party: 

 a. by personal service. I personally delivered the documents listed in item 2 to the party or person authorized to receive 

process for the party (1) on: Thu., Aug. 06, 2015 (2) at: 10:10AM

 b. I received this subpoena for service on: Wednesday, August 05, 2015

6. Witness fees were offered or demanded, and paid: $83.68M

7. Person Who Served Papers: Recoverable Cost Per CCP 1033.5(a)(4)(B) 

 a. Michael Morris d. The Fee for Service was:

e. I am: (3) registered California process server

(i) Independent Contractor

(ii) Registration No.: 2012-33

(iii) County: Sacramento

(iv) Expiration Date: Fri, Jul. 01, 2016

8. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California and under the laws of the United States Of

America that the foregoing is true and correct.

Date: Fri, Aug. 07, 2015

Judicial Council Form PROOF OF SERVICE (Michael Morris)

Rule 2.150.(a)&(b) Rev January 1, 2007 SUBPOENA 7186608 .arefo-sf.720680

Case 15-12361-BFK Doc 21 Filed 08/06/15 Entered 08/06/15 22:30:25 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1