alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 26, 2010 

s1018 

Order 

 

October 26, 2010 

141495 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141495 

 COA: 286988 

 Genesee CC: 07-020622-FC 

JANARD DANTE HACKWORTH, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 17, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Sanitary Fire Proofing and Contracting Company, Appellant, v. Emsworth Construction Company and Another Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
(No. 80-CC-0425

#### Carl W. Gehrke, Claimant, *v.*The State of Illinois *et al.,*Respondents.

*Order filed July 15, 1981.*

*Order on request to vacate dismissal filed Jan. 11, 1982.*

Shearer, O’Brien, Blood, Agrella & Boose, for Claimant.

Thomas, Mamer, Haughey & Miller, for Respondents.

Poch, J.

This cause coming to be heard on the motion of the Respondents to dismiss, due notice being given, the Claimant filing his objections thereto and the Court being fully advised;

Finds that section 22(g) of the Court of Claims Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 37, par. 439.22(g)), requires all *268actions sounding in tort to be filed within two years “after it first accrues.” An action in tort accrues when the elements, of a cause of action are present. *(Austin v. House of Vision*(1968), 101 Ill. App. 2d 251, 256, 243 N.E.2d 297.) This action is analogous to a medical malpractice action, where in such an action the cause of action accrues when the person injured learns of the injury or should reasonably have learned of it. *Lipsey v. Michael Reese Hospital*(1970), 46 Ill. 2d 32, 37, 262 N.E.2d 450; cf. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 83, par. 22.1, and *Roper v. Markle*(1978), 59 Ill. App. 3d 706, 375 N.E.2d 934.

In the instant case the Claimant does not refute the verified allegations of the Respondents that the Claimant was notified of the injury to the horse in question on either June 10 or 11, 1977. The only factual response made by Claimant to the motion to dismiss is an affidavit stating that he did not know “the nature and extent of the injury” to the horse until on or about October 23, 1977. The claim was not filed until October 15, 1979. The Claimant has the burden of proving he filed the action within 2 years after the injury or the date he reasonably could have learned of it. *(Kielminski v. St. Anthony’s Hospital*(1979), 68 Ill. App. 3d 407, 386 N.E.2d 326.) The Claimant’s failure to deny he knew of the injury to the horse on June 10 or 11, 1977, leaves the Court no choice but to find that he knew of the injury then even if he did not know of the nature and extent of it until October 23, 1977.

The failure of the plaintiff to commence his action within 2 years of the accrual of the action is a bar to the action.

It is hereby ordered:

*269That the motion of the Respondents to dismiss be, and the same is hereby granted and the claim is dismissed with prejudice.

ORDER ON REQUEST TO VACATE DISMISSAL

Poch, J.

This matter was heard on oral argument at the request of Claimant to vacate the dismissal order of July 15, 1981, Respondents having filed its objections to the motion to vacate.

The Court finds that there are no factual or legal reasons to vacate the dismissal order of July 15, 1981.

It is hereby ordered that the petition of Claimant to vacate the dismissal order of July 15, 1981, be and the same is hereby denied.
# Official Journal C 294/30 N

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 294 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4730 November 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 294

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4730 November 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 294/1 | Final annual accounts of the European Communities — Financial year 2003 — Volume I — Consolidated reports on implementation of the budget and consolidated financial statements | 1 |
| 2004/C 294/2 | The Court of Auditors' statement of assurance | 99 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 294/1

Final annual accounts of the European Communities — Financial year 2003 — Volume I — Consolidated reports on implementation of the budget and consolidated financial statements

1

2004/C 294/2

The Court of Auditors' statement of assurance

99

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4774 

To amend section 3554(a)(4) of title 44, United States Code, to direct 

the head of each agency to ensure Federal employees are trained in 

cyber security, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 21, 2019 

Mr. KHANNA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend section 3554(a)(4) of title 44, United States Code, 

to direct the head of each agency to ensure Federal 

employees are trained in cyber security, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Internet of Things 

5 Cyber Security Training for Federal Employees Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4774 IH

1 SEC. 2. CYBER SECURITY TRAINING FOR FEDERAL EM2 PLOYEES. 

3 Section 3554(a)(4) of title 44, United States Code, 

4 is amended by striking the semicolon at the end and add5 ing ‘‘, including ensuring such personnel have been trained 

6 in cyber security and the risks related to internet-con7 nected devices;’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Earl W. Brown, Respondent, against Ushco Manufacturing Company, Inc., et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the quarterly report of LegalPlay Entertainment Inc. on form 10-Q for the period  ended  March 31, 2004as  filed  with  the  Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark Glusing, President and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted  pursuant  to  section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that:



1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/Mark Glusing

Mark Glusing

President, Acting CFO, May 15, 2004
#### In the Matter of the Summary Proceedings by Charles Beeny, Agent, Respondent, v. Charles B. Templeton, Appellant.

Motion denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PremierWest Bancorp (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James M. Ford, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                       
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                             
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period certified.

This certification is being furnished solely to comply with the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any of the Companys filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise be deemed to be filed as part of the Report or under such Acts.

|                   |                                                                    
|------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2009 | /s/ JAMES M. FORDJames M. FordPresident
and Chief Executive Officer

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of BlastGard International, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the company on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the companys
financial condition and results of operations.



August 12, 2005



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael J. Gordon                     
|Michael J. Gordon, Chief Financial Officer
### §426. Stones River National Battlefield; establishment; appointment of commission

A commission is created, to be composed of the following members, who shall be appointed by the Secretary of the Interior:

(1) A commissioned officer of the Corps of Engineers, United States Army;

(2) A veteran of the Civil War who served honorably in the military forces of the United States; and

(3) A veteran of the Civil War who served honorably in the military forces of the Confederate States of America.

(Mar. 3, 1927, ch. 374, §1, 44 Stat. 1399; Ex. Ord. No. 6166, §2, June 10, 1933; Ex. Ord. No. 6228, §1, July 28, 1933; Pub. L. 86–443, §§2, 3, Apr. 22, 1960, 74 Stat. 82.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Stones River National Military Park redesignated Stones River National Battlefield by Pub. L. 86–443. See section 426l of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Administrative functions of Stones River National Military Park transferred to Department of the Interior by Ex. Ord. Nos. 6166 and 6228, set out as notes under section 901 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees. Administrative functions of Stones River National Battlefield assigned to Department of the Interior by section 3 of Pub. L. 86–443, set out as section 426m of this title.

National Park Service substituted for Office of National Parks, Buildings, and Reservations referred to in Ex. Ord. No. 6166, §2, by act Mar. 2, 1934, ch. 38, §1, 48 Stat. 389.
§ 241.2 Warrant of removal. ( a ) *Issuance of a warrant of removal* — ( 1 ) *In general.* A Form I-205, Warrant of Removal, based on the final administrative removal order in the alien's case will be issued by any of the following immigration officials: ( i ) Director, Enforcement and Removal Operations;
( ii ) Deputy Assistant Director, Field Operations;
( iii ) Field Office Directors;
( iv ) Deputy Field Office Directors;
( v ) Assistant Field Office Directors;
( vi ) Officers in Charge;
( vii ) Special Agents in Charge;
( viii ) Deputy Special Agents in Charge;
( ix ) Associate Special Agents in Charge;
( x ) Assistant Special Agents in Charge;
( xi ) Group Supervisors;
( xii ) Resident Agents in Charge;
( xiii ) District Field Officers;
( xiv ) Chief Patrol Agents;
( xv ) Deputy Chief Patrol Agents;
( xvi ) Division Chiefs;
( xvii ) Assistant Chief Patrol Agents;
( xviii ) Patrol Agents in Charge;
( xix ) Deputy Patrol Agents in Charge;
( xx ) Watch Commanders, Border Patrol;
( xxi ) Director of Air Operations;
( xxii ) Director of Marine Operations;
( xxiii ) Supervisory Air and Marine Interdiction Agents;
( xxiv ) Unit Chief, Law Enforcement Support Center;
( xxv ) Section Chief, Law Enforcement Support Center;
( xxvi ) Port Directors;
( xxvii ) Assistant Port Directors;
( xxviii ) Directors, Field Operations;
( xxix ) Assistant Directors, Field Operations;
( xxx ) Watch Commanders, Field Operations;
( xxxi ) Chiefs, Field Operations; and
( xxxii ) Other duly authorized officers or employees of the Department of Homeland Security or the United States who are delegated the authority as provided in 8 CFR 2.1 to issue Warrants of Removal, and who have successfully completed any required immigration law enforcement training.
( 2 ) *Costs and care during removal.* The immigration officials listed in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (xxxi) of this section, and other officers or employees of the Department or the United States who are delegated the authority as provided in 8 CFR 2.1, shall exercise the authority contained in section 241 of the Act to determine at whose expense the alien shall be removed and whether his or her mental or physical condition requires personal care and attention en route to his or her destination.
( b ) *Execution of the warrant of removal.* Any officer authorized by 8 CFR 287.5(e)(3) to execute administrative warrants of arrest may execute a warrant of removal.
[70 FR 67089, Nov. 4, 2005, as amended at 81 FR 62355, Sept. 9, 2016]
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 74768 / April 20, 2015

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-14594

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of : ORDER GRANTING

CREDIT SUISSE ALTERNATIVE : EXTENSION OF TIME

CAPITAL, LLC (f/k/a CREDIT : TO SUBMIT PROPOSED

SUISSE ALTERNATIVE CAPITAL, : PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

INC.), CREDIT SUISSE ASSET :

MANAGEMENT, LLC, and :

SAMIR H. BHATT, : 

:

Respondents. :

____________________________________:

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested an order for an 

extension of time, until July 14, 2015, to submit a proposed plan of distribution in the 

above-captioned matter pursuant to Rule 1101(a) of the Commission’s Rules on Fair 

Fund and Disgorgement Plans. In its request, the Division states that the violations in 

this matter arise in connection with the same conduct alleged in SEC v. Citigroup 

Global Markets Inc. (the “Citigroup action” or the “civil action”) (11-cv-7387), a 

settled case filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York,

which settlement was rejected by the Court and the case set for trial on July 16, 2012. 

The SEC appealed the trial court’s rulings to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second 

Circuit (“Second Circuit”), and a stay was entered on March 15, 2012 pending 

resolution of the appeal.1 Oral arguments were heard before the Second Circuit on 

 

1

See United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Docket No. 

11-05227 (2d Cir., Dec. 20, 2011).
2

February 8, 2013. On August 5, 2014, final judgment was entered by the Southern 

District of New York.2 

Now that the final judgment has been entered, the Division states that 

additional time is needed to determine the feasibility of a distribution to injured 

investors as well as the appropriate procedure and methodology to utilize.

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 

Division’s request for an extension of time until July 14, 2015 to submit a proposed 

plan of distribution is granted. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority. 

Brent J. Fields

Secretary

 

2

See Securities & Exchange Commission v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Case No. 11-cv-7387 (JSR) 

(S.D.N.Y., Aug. 5, 2014).
I, Robin Lecky, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Gravitas
International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
     prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: Oct 2nd 2003
/s/ Robin Lecky


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000047968
<NAME>                        Aarow Environmental Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1
<CURRENCY>                                    US Dollars

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 Dec-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                             1,248
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      3,376
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                       13,508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  18,132
<PP&E>                                           302,633
<DEPRECIATION>                                   147,992
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   472,381
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            825,367
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                        3,000
<COMMON>                                         373,615
<OTHER-SE>                                       220,557
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     472,381
<SALES>                                          133,688
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 133,688
<CGS>                                             30,542
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     30,542
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 472,931
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                16,508
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (363,968)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (363,968)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (386,256)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.024)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.015)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 12

GTE HAWAIIAN TELEPHONE COMPANY INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

Statements of the Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              Years Ended December 31,
                                             -----------------------------------------------------------
                                                1999        1998        1997        1996        1995
                                             -----------------------------------------------------------
                                                               (Dollars in Millions)
<S>                                          <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Net earnings available for fixed charges:
  Income before extraordinary charges        $     96.8  $     72.9  $     61.0  $     54.7  $     37.9
  Add - Income taxes                               52.1        36.2        42.3        23.9        15.0
      - Fixed charges                              43.4        49.0        46.0        45.6        46.1
                                             ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------

Adjusted earnings                            $    192.3  $    158.1  $    149.3  $    124.2  $     99.0
                                             ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                           $     39.9  $     44.7  $     41.2  $     40.9  $     41.8
  Portion of rent expense representing
    interest                                        3.5         4.3         4.8         4.7         4.3
                                             ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------

Adjusted fixed charges                       $     43.4  $     49.0  $     46.0  $     45.6  $     46.1
                                             ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED
  CHARGES                                          4.43        3.23        3.25       2.72         2.15
</TABLE>
#### Frances Kirchgessner, Respondent, v. Joseph Lohrmann, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Present—Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.