alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §583j–5. Audits and report requirements

#### (a) Audits

For purposes of section 10101 of title 36 the Foundation shall be treated as a corporation in part B of subtitle II of title 36.

#### (b) Annual reports

The Foundation shall transmit each year to Congress a report of its proceedings and activities of the previous year, including a full and complete statement of its receipts, expenditures, and investments.

(Pub. L. 101–593, title IV, §407, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2973; Pub. L. 114–54, title II, §201(c)(2), Sept. 30, 2015, 129 Stat. 516.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

In subsec. (a), "section 10101 of title 36" substituted for "the Act entitled 'An Act for audit of accounts of private corporations established under Federal law,' approved August 30, 1964 (36 U.S.C. 1101 through 1103; Public Law 88–504)" and "a corporation in part B of subtitle II of title 36" substituted for "a private corporation established under Federal law" on authority of Pub. L. 105–225, §5(b), Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1499, the first section of which enacted Title 36, Patriotic and National Observances, Ceremonies, and Organizations.

#### Amendments

2015—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 114–54 struck out comma after "The Foundation shall".
#### In the Matter of the Claim of William E. Dougherty, Appellant.

All concur.
§ 324.2 Former citizen at birth or by naturalization. ( a ) *Eligibility.* To be eligible for naturalization under section 324(a) of the Act, an applicant must establish that she: ( 1 ) Was formerly a United States citizen;
( 2 ) Lost or may have lost United States citizenship: ( i ) Prior to September 22, 1922, by marriage to an alien, or by the loss of United States citizenship of the applicant's spouse; or
( ii ) On or after September 22, 1922, by marriage before March 3, 1931 to an alien ineligible to citizenship;
( 3 ) Did not acquire any other nationality by affirmative act other than by marriage;
( 4 ) Either: ( i ) Has resided in the United States continuously since the date of the marriage referred to in paragraph (a)(2) of this section; or
( ii ) Has been lawfully admitted for permanent residence prior to filing an application for naturalization;
( 5 ) Has been and is a person of good moral character, attached to the principles of the Constitution of the United States, and favorably disposed toward the good order and happiness of the United States, for the period of not less than five years immediately preceding the examination on the application for naturalization up to the time of admission to citizenship; and
( 6 ) Complies with all other requirements for naturalization as provided in part 316 of this chapter, except that: ( i ) The applicant is not required to satisfy the residence requirements under § 316.2(a)(3) through (a)(6) of this chapter; and,
( ii ) The applicant need not set forth an intention to reside permanently within the United States.
( b ) *Application.* An applicant for naturalization under this section must submit an application on the form designated by USCIS in accordance with the form instructions and with the fee prescribed in 8 CFR 106.2 as required by 8 CFR 316.4. The application must be accompanied by a statement describing the applicant's eligibility as provided in paragraph (a) of this section as well as any available documentation to establish those facts.
[56 FR 50490, Oct. 7, 1991, as amended at 74 FR 26941, June 5, 2009; 76 FR 53800, Aug. 29, 2011; 76 FR 73477, Nov. 29, 2011; 85 FR 46928, Aug. 3, 2020]
§ 208.12 Reliance on information compiled by other sources. ( a ) In deciding an asylum application, or in deciding whether the alien has a credible fear of persecution or torture pursuant to § 208.30 of this part, or a reasonable fear of persecution or torture pursuant to § 208.31, the asylum officer may rely on material provided by the Department of State, other USCIS offices, or other credible sources, such as international organizations, private voluntary agencies, news organizations, or academic institutions.
( b ) Nothing in this part shall be construed to entitle the applicant to conduct discovery directed toward the records, officers, agents, or employees of the Service, the Department of Justice, or the Department of State. Persons may continue to seek documents available through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request pursuant to 8 CFR part 103.
[62 FR 10337, Mar. 6, 1997, as amended at 64 FR 8488, Feb. 19, 1999; 65 FR 76133, Dec. 6, 2000; 76 FR 53784, Aug. 29, 2011]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALEJANDRO PRADO,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees,

and

J. JIMENEZ, Lieutenant; et al.,

Defendants. No. 19

- 15985

D.C. No. 2:15

- cv

- 01866

- WBS

- DB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 5 , 2020 * *

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Alejandro Prado appeals pro se from the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 15985

court’s summary judgment in his action alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

and Ti tle II of t he Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) . We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. JL Beverage Co., LLC v. Jim Beam

Brands Co. , 828 F.3d 1098, 1104 (9th Cir. 2016). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Prado’s ADA

claim because Prado failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether

defendants were deliberately indifferent to his disability. See Duvall v. County of

Kitsa p , 260 F.3d 1124, 1138

- 39 (9th Cir. 2001) ( to recover monetary damages

under the ADA, a plaintiff must show intentional discrimination; the test for

intentional discrimination is deliberate indifference ).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Prado’s Eighth

Amendment delibe rate indifference claim because Prado failed to raise a triable

dispute as to whether defendants were deliberately indifferent to a serious risk to

Prado’s health or safety. See Farmer v. Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 84 7 (1994)

(explaining that a prison officia l acts with deliberate indifference if the prison

official “knows that inmates face a substantial risk of serious harm and disregards

that risk by failing to take reasonable measures to abate it”).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Pr ado’s equal

protection claim because Prado failed to raise a triable dispute as to whether

defendants acted with an intent or purpose to discriminate against him based on his3 19

- 15985

disability. See Hartmann v. Cal. Dep’t of Corrs. & Rehab. , 707 F.3d 1114, 1123

( 9th Cir. 2013) (setting forth requirements of an equal protection claim , including

that the defendant must act with a discriminatory intent or purpose based upon

membership in a protected class ).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief

, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal

. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 
| **PEC Solutions, Inc.** | **[PEC LOGO]** | 12730 Fair Lakes Circle |
|-------------------------|----------------|-------------------------|
|                    |           | Fairfax, VA  22003      |
|                    |           | 703-679-4900  voice     |
|                    |           | 703-679-4901  facsimile |
|                    |           | www.pec.com             |

 

**Certificationof Principal Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18U.S.C. 1350**

**(Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

I, Stuart R. Lloyd, Chief Financial Officer(principal financial officer) of PEC Solutions, Inc. (the “Registrant”),certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon review of the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2003 of theRegistrant (the “Report”):

 
| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) [15(d)] of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934, as amended; and                   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                      |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Registrant. |

 
| /s/  STUART R. LLOYD |            |
|---------------------------|-----------------|
| Name:                     | Stuart R. Lloyd |   |
| Date:                     | May 14, 2003    |   |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
 
   
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
    
 
   
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
    
 
   
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
of Starwood Lodging Trust and Starwood Lodging Corporation (the "Company") on
Forms S-3 (File No. 333-13411 and 333-13325) of our report dated February 21,
1997 on our audits of the separate and combined financial statements of the
Company as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and for the years ended December 31,
1996 and 1995, which report is included in the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K.
    
 
   
Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
    
 
   
Phoenix, Arizona
    
   
December 17, 1997
# fTT'm HENDERSON 

# lU.!l legal services experience

### does matter

1015 15thStreet, NV1T, Suite 525 "Washington, DC 20005 "hendersonlegalservices.com" 877.548.8787" 202.220.4158

November 16, 2015 VIA EMAIL Counsel Legislation, Regulation and Energy Efficiency (GC-33) Office ofthe General Counsel U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20585 Re: June 1, 2015 ASRAC CUAC Meeting Transcript Revisions Dear Counsel: Please be advised the transcriptfrom the June 1, 2015 Meeting was checked against the audio files, and was updated accordinglyto produce a more accurate record ofthe proceedings. The revised transcript files which are attached should supersede the files previously delivered in June ofthis year.
Please contact us ifyou have any questions

.

Brock C. Rones Senior Manager, Production Henderson Legal Services
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Hercules Incorporated 10K95
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          72,941
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  425,865
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    308,080
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               867,133
<PP&E>                                       2,564,240
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,564,543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,493,478
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          686,721
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,992
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,176,846
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,493,478
<SALES>                                      2,427,180
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,427,180
<CGS>                                        1,591,715
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,064,187
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,383
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                504,643
<INCOME-TAX>                                   171,893
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            332,750
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   332,750
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.87


</TABLE>
### §469l. Omitted or Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 105–203, §2, July 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 678, which provided congressional findings and purposes regarding commemoration of the Underground Railroad, was omitted in part and transferred in part. Subsec. (a), which provided congressional findings, was omitted from the Code following the enactment of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs, by Pub. L. 113–287. Subsec. (b), which provided purposes of former sections 469l to 469l–2 of this title, was transferred and is set out as a note under section 308301 of Title 54.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of The SCO Group, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q, for the period ended January 31, 2006, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Darl C. McBride,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 
| By:    | /s/  Darl C. McBride                   |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Darl  C. McBride                       |   |
|   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

Date:                    March 17, 2006

 

----
# Official Journal C 423/2017

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 423 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 609 December 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 423

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 609 December 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions |
| | RECOMMENDATIONS |
| | Council |
| 2017/C 423/01 | Council Recommendation of 20 November 2017 on tracking graduates (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

RECOMMENDATIONS

Council

2017/C 423/01

Council Recommendation of 20 November 2017 on tracking graduates (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | II   Information |
| --- | --- |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 423/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8691 — Innogy/European Energy Exchange/JV) (
  1
  ) | 5 |
| 2017/C 423/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8698 — EQT/Curaeos Holding) (
  1
  ) | 5 |

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 423/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8691 — Innogy/European Energy Exchange/JV) (
  1
  )

1

5

2017/C 423/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8698 — EQT/Curaeos Holding) (
  1
  )

1

5

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2017/C 423/04 | Conclusions of the Council and of the representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on the role of coaches in society | 6 |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 423/05 | Euro exchange rates | 11 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2017/C 423/04

Conclusions of the Council and of the representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on the role of coaches in society

6

European Commission

2017/C 423/05

Euro exchange rates

11

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### § 335.7 Failure to prosecute application after initial examination.

An applicant for naturalization who has appeared for the examination on his or her application as provided in 8 CFR 335.2 will be considered as failing to prosecute such application if he or she, without good cause being shown, either failed to excuse an absence from a subsequently required appearance, or fails to provide within a reasonable period of time such documents, information, or testimony deemed by USCIS to be necessary to establish his or her eligibility for naturalization. USCIS will deliver notice of requests for appearance or evidence as provided in 8 CFR 103.8. In the event that the applicant fails to respond within 30 days of the date of notification, USCIS will adjudicate the application on the merits pursuant to 8 CFR 336.1.

[76 FR 53801, Aug. 29, 2011]
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________ NO . 09
- 1 3
- 00 499
- C R



### ____________________
IN RE JODY FLOYD MATHES

_______________________________________________________ ______________ Original Proceeding

________________________________________________________ _____________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Jody Floyd Mathes filed a petition for writ of mandamus to compel the preparation of a chronological itemized list of all documents filed in Cause Nos. 09

- 06

- 05587

- CR and 09

- 06

- 05589

- CR, in the 221st District Court of Montgomery County, Texas. He also requests that this Court either order the respondents to allow him to purchase the cl erk’s and reporter’s records from a prepared chronological list of documents or issue a decla ratory judgment of his rights. This Court lacks mandamus jurisdiction over a district clerk or a district attorney unless it is necessary to enforce this Court’s j urisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004). This Court has mandamus jurisdiction against a2 judge of a dis trict court in our geographic jurisdiction , but after reviewing the mandamus petition and record, we conclude that Mathes has not demonstrated that
he has a clear right to the relief he seeks from the Judge of the 221st District Court of Montgomery County, Texas. See id. § 22 1 .21(b)(1); see also In re State ex rel. Tharp , 393 S.W.3d 75 1, 754 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012) ( To be ent itled to mandamus relief, the relator must show that he has a clear right to the relief sought.). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM Opinion Delivered November 27, 2013 Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
# Official Journal L 65/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.065.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 65 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 553 March 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.065.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 65

English edition

Legislation

Volume 553 March 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | GUIDELINES |
| | | 2012/120/EU |
| | * | Guideline of the European Central Bank of 9 December 2011 on the statistical reporting requirements of the European Central Bank in the field of external statistics (ECB/2011/23) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

GUIDELINES

2012/120/EU

*

Guideline of the European Central Bank of 9 December 2011 on the statistical reporting requirements of the European Central Bank in the field of external statistics (ECB/2011/23)

(ECB/2011/23)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Charles H. Springer, Appellant, v. Henrietta T. Thompson, etc., Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

            CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON ELECTRIC, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              (MILLIONS OF DOLLARS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                    ---------------------------------------
                                                                     2001    2002     2003     2004    2005
                                                                    -----   ------   ------   -----   -----
<S>                                                                 <C>     <C>      <C>      <C>     <C>
Income from continuing operations ...............................   $ 446   $  547   $  432   $ 282   $ 223
Income taxes for continuing operations ..........................     228      286      230     137     108
Capitalized interest ............................................      (9)      (3)      (3)     (2)     (3)
Preference security dividend requirements of subsidiary .........      (1)      --       --      --      --
                                                                    -----   ------   ------   -----   -----
                                                                      664      830      659     417     328
                                                                    -----   ------   ------   -----   -----
Fixed charges, as defined:
   Interest .....................................................     233      285      361     345     328
   Capitalized interest .........................................       9        3        3       2       3
   Preference security dividend requirements of subsidiary ......       1       --       --      --      --
   Interest component of rentals charged to operating expense ...       2        2        2       1       1
                                                                    -----   ------   ------   -----   -----
   Total fixed charges ..........................................     245      290      366     348     332
                                                                    -----   ------   ------   -----   -----
Earnings, as defined ............................................   $ 909   $1,120   $1,025   $ 765   $ 660
                                                                    =====   ======   ======   =====   =====
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ..............................    3.71     3.86     2.80    2.20    1.99
                                                                    =====   ======   ======   =====   =====
</TABLE>