alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

RICHMOND DIVISION

RE: Michael Robert Dickinson XXX-XX-4844

 

Case No. 18-34024-KRH

DIRECTIVE FOR VOLUNTARY PAYMENTS BY DEBTOR

The Debtor(s) having filed a petition under Chapter 13, Title 11 U.S.C. or converted this case from 

Chapter 7;

IT IS DIRECTED;

That commencing immediately and continuing on the 7th day of each and every month thereafter 

until further Directive from the Trustee, the Debtor(s) shall pay to Carl M. Bates, Trustee, and send 

to Chapter 13 Trustee, PO Box 1433, Memphis, TN 38101-1433, the sum of $515.00 monthly. 

The payment should include the debtor's name and case number above.

THIS DIRECTIVE IS ENTERED PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER NO. 04-1 OF THE 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT.

Dated: September 27, 2018

/S/ Carl M. Bates

Carl M. Bates, Trustee

Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division

The Trustee does hereby certify that a copy of this Directive was mailed to the Debtor and 

electronically sent to Debtor’s counsel on the date above written.

/S/ Carl M. Bates

Carl M. Bates, Trustee

Case 18-34024-KRH Doc 19 Filed 09/27/18 Entered 09/27/18 14:21:02 Desc

Page 1 of 1
HENRY L. CREEL CO., INC.
                    Certified Public Accountant
                          (216) 491-0800
                        Fax (216) 491-0803





To Whom It May Concern:


The  firm of Henry L. Creel Co., Inc., Certified Public Accountant
Consents  to  the  inclusion of my report of June  30,  2000,  the
Financial Statements of Augrid of Nevada, Inc. from the six months
ended January 1, 2000 though June 30, 2000 in any filing that  are
necessary  now  or in the near future to be filed  with  the  U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission.



Respectfully,

/s/ Henry L. Creel

Henry L. Creel, CPA

August 7, 2000
#### § 190.3 Agreement to control advertising.

To qualify for the bonus payment, a State must have entered into an agreement with the Secretary to control outdoor advertising. It must fulfill, and must continue to fulfill its obligations under such agreement consistent with 23 CFR 750.101.
- Newsroom        - Press Releases
      - Public Statements
      - Speeches
      - Testimony
      - Spotlight Topics
      - Media Gallery
      - Upcoming Events
      - Webcasts
      - What's New
      - SEC Videos
      - Reports and Publications
      - RSS Feeds
      - Social Media 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

**TIME AND DATE:** Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. No. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, September 18, 2019, at 2:00 p.m., to hear oral argument in an appeal by Alexandre S. Clug, and a cross-appeal by the Division of Enforcement, from an initial decision of an administrative law judge.

**PLACE:** Auditorium (L-002) at Commission’s headquarters, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549.

**STATUS:** This meeting will be open to the public.

**MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:** On February 8, 2016, the law judge found that (i) Clug and Aurum Mining, LLC violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder by making material misrepresentations and omissions to investors; (ii) PanAm Terra, Inc. violated Securities Act Section 17(a)(2) by making material misrepresentations and omissions to investors; (iii) Clug and The Corsair Group violated Exchange Act Section 15(a)(1) by acting as unregistered brokers; and (iv) Clug aided, abetted, and caused a violation by Michael W. Crow of Exchange Act Section 15(b)(6)(B).  The law judge also found that Crow was not a de facto executive officer of PanAm, and therefore that PanAm was not primarily liable or Clug secondarily liable for violating Securities Act Section 17(a), Exchange Act Sections 10(b) and 13(a), and Exchange Act Rules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-1, and 13a-13, and that Clug did not violate Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) by failing to disclose Crow’s role at PanAm in its periodic reports.

The law judge ordered that Clug cease-and-desist from further violations, pay disgorgement plus prejudgment interest, and be barred from the securities industry and from participating in penny stock offerings.  The law judge did not sanction Aurum, PanAm, or Corsair.

Clug appealed the law judge’s findings of fact and conclusions of law as to his violations and sanctions.  The Division cross-appealed the findings related to Crow’s role at PanAm and the sanctions for Clug, Aurum, PanAm, and Corsair.  The issues likely to be considered at oral argument include whether Clug, Aurum, PanAm, and Corsair committed the above violations and what, if any, sanctions are appropriate.

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:** For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: September 11, 2019

Vanessa A. CountrymanSecretary
§ 240.63 Application process. ( a ) *Form and fees.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the application must be made on the form prescribed by USCIS for this program and filed in accordance with the instructions for that form. An applicant who submitted to EOIR a completed, Application for Suspension of Deportation, before the effective date of the form prescribed by USCIS may apply with USCIS by submitting the completed Application for Suspension of Deportation attached to a completed first page of the application. Each application must be filed with the required fees as provided in 8 CFR 106.2.
( b ) *Applications filed with EOIR.* If jurisdiction rests with the Immigration Court under § 260.62(b), the application must be made on the Form I-881, if filed subsequent to June 21, 1999. The application form, along with any supporting documents, must be filed with the Immigration Court and served on the Service's district counsel in accordance with the instructions on or accompanying the form. Applications for suspension of deportation or special rule cancellation of removal filed prior to June 21, 1999 shall be filed on Form EOIR-40.
( c ) *Applications filed with the Service.* If jurisdiction rests with the Service under § 240.62(a), the Form I-881 and supporting documents must be filed in accordance with the instructions on or accompanying the form.
( d ) *Conditions and consequences of filing.* Applications filed under this section shall be filed under the following conditions and shall have the following consequences: ( 1 ) The information provided in the application may be used as a basis for the initiation of removal proceedings, or to satisfy any burden of proof in exclusion, deportation, or removal proceedings;
( 2 ) The applicant and anyone other than a spouse, parent, son, or daughter of the applicant who assists the applicant in preparing the application must sign the application under penalty of perjury. The applicant's signature establishes a presumption that the applicant is aware of the contents of the application. A person other than a relative specified in this paragraph who assists the applicant in preparing the application also must provide his or her full mailing address;
( 3 ) An application that does not include a response to each of the questions contained in the application, is unsigned, or is unaccompanied by the required materials specified in the instructions to the application is incomplete and shall be returned by mail to the applicant within 30 days of receipt of the application by the Service; and
( 4 ) Knowing placement of false information on the application may subject the person supplying that information to criminal penalties under title 18 of the United States Code and to civil penalties under section 274C of the Act.
[64 FR 27876, May 21, 1999, as amended at 74 FR 26939, June 5, 2009; 85 FR 46926, Aug. 3, 2020; 89 FR 6398, Jan. 31, 2024]
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 91815 / May 10, 2021

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-19597

In the Matter of

Bethany Liou and Golden 

California Regional Center, LLC,

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER DIRECTING 

DISBURSEMENT OF 

DISTRIBUTION FUND

On September 2, 2020, the Commission published a Notice of Proposed Plan of 

Distribution and Opportunity for Comment (“Notice”),1 pursuant to Rule 1103 of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans (“Commission’s Rules”). 2 The 

Notice advised interested persons that they could obtain a copy of the Proposed Plan of 

Distribution (“Proposed Plan”) from the Commission’s public website or by submitting a written 

request to Catherine E. Pappas, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, One Penn 

Center, 1617 JFK Blvd., Ste. 520, Philadelphia, PA 19103. The Notice also advised that all 

persons desiring to comment on the Proposed Plan could submit their comments, in writing, 

within 30 days of the Notice. The Commission received four comments on the Proposed Plan 

during the comment period. On December 10, 2020, after thorough review and substantial 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 89755 (Sept. 2, 2020).

2

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1103.
2

consideration, the Commission issued an order approving the Proposed Plan without 

modification,3 and posted the approved Plan of Distribution (the “Plan”). 

The Plan provides for the distribution of the Distribution Fund, plus accumulated interest, 

less taxes, fees, and expenses, to the harmed investors according to the methodology set forth in 

the Plan. 

Pursuant to the Plan, the Fund Administrator has submitted a payment file to Commission 

staff with a reasonable assurance letter as to the completeness and accuracy of the information 

contained therein. The Commission staff has reviewed the payment file and requests, pursuant to 

Rule 1101(b)(6) of the Commission’s Rules, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(b)(6), that the Commission 

authorize the transfer of $48,373,956.25 from the Distribution Fund to the Distribution Fund’s 

escrow account at The Huntington National Bank for distribution by the Fund Administrator to 

the eligible investors in accordance with the Plan. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, that Commission staff shall transfer 

$48,373,956.25 from the Distribution Fund to the Distribution Fund’s escrow account at The

Huntington National Bank, and the Fund Administrator shall distribute such monies to the 

eligible investors in accordance with the Plan. 

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.4

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

3

 See Order Approving Plan of Distribution, Exchange Act Rel. No. 90625 (Dec. 10, 2020).

4

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(v).
§ 222.6 Which applications does the Secretary accept? ( a ) The Secretary accepts or approves for payment any otherwise approvable application under section 8002 or section 8003 that is timely filed with the Secretary in accordance with §§ 222.3, 222.4, and 222.5, as applicable.
( b ) The Secretary does not accept or approve for payment any section 8002 or section 8003 application that is not timely filed with the Secretary as described in paragraph (a) of this section, except as follows: ( 1 ) The Secretary accepts and approves for payment any otherwise approvable application filed within— ( i ) 60 days from the application deadline established in § 222.3; or
( ii ) 60 days from the date of the Secretary's written notice of an LEA's failure to comply with the applicable filing date.
( 2 ) The Secretary reduces the payment for applications described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section by 10 percent of the amount that would have been paid if the LEA had timely filed the application.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7705)
[60 FR 50778, Sept. 29, 1995, as amended at 80 FR 33162, June 11, 2015]
§ 300.310 Observation. ( a ) The public agency must ensure that the child is observed in the child's learning environment (including the regular classroom setting) to document the child's academic performance and behavior in the areas of difficulty.
( b ) The group described in § 300.306(a)(1), in determining whether a child has a specific learning disability, must decide to— ( 1 ) Use information from an observation in routine classroom instruction and monitoring of the child's performance that was done before the child was referred for an evaluation; or
( 2 ) Have at least one member of the group described in § 300.306(a)(1) conduct an observation of the child's academic performance in the regular classroom after the child has been referred for an evaluation and parental consent, consistent with § 300.300(a), is obtained.
( c ) In the case of a child of less than school age or out of school, a group member must observe the child in an environment appropriate for a child of that age.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3; 1401(30); 1414(b)(6))
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

RULE 13A-14(A) OR RULE 15D-14(A)



I, Steven M. Healy, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Imperial Industries, Inc. (the registrant);



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  March 31, 2006



/s/ Steven M. Healy

Steven M. Healy

Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Coconino Resource Advisory Committee will meet in                               ( print page 17107)                            Flagstaff, Arizona, to conduct an initial review of project proposals in preparation for the proposal presentations in May. No proposals will be heard at this meeting.                    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held April 28, 2011, beginning at 12 p.m. to 5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held in the Ponderosa Room of the Coconino County Health Department, 2625 N. King St., Flagstaff, Arizona, 86004. Send written comments to Brady Smith, RAC Coordinator, Coconino Resource Advisory Committee, c/o Forest Service, USDA, 1824 S. Thompson St., Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 or electronically to                         *bradysmith@fs.fed.us.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brady Smith, Coconino National Forest, (928) 527-3490.

Dated: March 22, 2011.

Kristin Bail, 

Acting Forest Supervisor, Coconino National Forest.

[FR Doc. 2011-7209 Filed 3-25-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
PUBLIC LAW 114–239—OCT. 7, 2016 130 STAT. 973 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5946 (S. 2650): 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 114–762 (Comm. on Ways and Means). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

Sept. 20, 22, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–239 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income any 

prizes or awards won in competition in the Olympic Games or the Paralympic 

Games. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Appreciation 

for Olympians and Paralympians Act of 2016’’. 

SEC. 2. OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC MEDALS AND USOC PRIZE MONEY 

EXCLUDED FROM GROSS INCOME. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 74 of the Internal Revenue Code 

of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

‘‘(d) EXCEPTION FOR OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC MEDALS AND

PRIZES.— 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Gross income shall not include the value 

of any medal awarded in, or any prize money received from 

the United States Olympic Committee on account of, competition in the Olympic Games or Paralympic Games. 

‘‘(2) LIMITATION BASED ON ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME.— 

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply to 

any taxpayer for any taxable year if the adjusted gross 

income (determined without regard to this subsection) of 

such taxpayer for such taxable year exceeds $1,000,000 

(half of such amount in the case of a married individual 

filing a separate return). 

‘‘(B) COORDINATION WITH OTHER LIMITATIONS.—For 

purposes of sections 86, 135, 137, 199, 219, 221, 222, and 

469, adjusted gross income shall be determined after the 

application of paragraph (1) and before the application 

of subparagraph (A).’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by this section 

shall apply to prizes and awards received after December 31, 2015. 

Approved October 7, 2016. 

26 USC 74 note. 

Determination. 

26 USC 74. 

26 USC 1 note. 

United States 

Appreciation for 

Olympians and 

Paralympians 

Act of 2016. 

Oct. 7, 2016 

[H.R. 5946] 


kgrant on DSKB33CYQ1 with PUBLAW
Searched for **https://www.stopfakes.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.stopfakes.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 34

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

06/17

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
Case 17-11389-BFK Doc 14 Filed 07/12/17 Entered 07/12/17 18:56:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 10
Case 17-11389-BFK Doc 14 Filed 07/12/17 Entered 07/12/17 18:56:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 10
Case 17-11389-BFK Doc 14 Filed 07/12/17 Entered 07/12/17 18:56:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 10
Case 17-11389-BFK Doc 14 Filed 07/12/17 Entered 07/12/17 18:56:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 10
Case 17-11389-BFK Doc 14 Filed 07/12/17 Entered 07/12/17 18:56:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 10
Case 17-11389-BFK Doc 14 Filed 07/12/17 Entered 07/12/17 18:56:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 10
Case 17-11389-BFK Doc 14 Filed 07/12/17 Entered 07/12/17 18:56:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 10
Case 17-11389-BFK Doc 14 Filed 07/12/17 Entered 07/12/17 18:56:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 10
Case 17-11389-BFK Doc 14 Filed 07/12/17 Entered 07/12/17 18:56:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 10
Case 17-11389-BFK Doc 14 Filed 07/12/17 Entered 07/12/17 18:56:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 10
#### § 300.178 Determination by the Secretary that a State is eligible to receive a grant.

If the Secretary determines that a State is eligible to receive a grant under Part B of the Act, the Secretary notifies the State of that determination.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1412(d)(1))
#### In re El Shaddai MASADA, Petitioner.

No. 02-6361.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 25, 2002.

Decided May 8, 2002.

El Shaddai Masada, Petitioner Pro Se.

*110Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

El Shaddai Masada filed this mandamus petition seeking to compel the district court to expedite its consideration of his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) action. Mandamus is a drastic remedy only to be used in extraordinary circumstances. *In re Beard,*811 F.2d 818, 826-27 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear and indisputable right to the relief sought and there are no other adequate means for obtaining the requested relief. *Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.,*449 U.S. 33, 35, 101 S.Ct. 188, 66 L.Ed.2d 193 (1980); *Beard,*811 F.2d at 826. Masada has failed to make the requisite showing for such extraordinary relief. Our review of the district court docket sheet discloses that there has been no undue delay in Masada’s § 1983 action.

We grant Masada’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We deny Masada’s motions for sanctions and to consolidate this case with another mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*