alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 92097 / June 3, 2021

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20162

In the Matter of

BlueCrest Capital Management 

Limited,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

FUND ADMINISTRATOR AND 

SETTING ADMINISTRATOR’S 

BOND AMOUNT

On December 8, 2020, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Administrative and 

Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 

203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Making Findings, and Imposing 

Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order (the “Order”)1 against BlueCrest Capital 

Management Limited (“BlueCrest”). These proceedings arose from BlueCrest’s management of 

a proprietary hedge fund, BSMA Limited (“BSMA”). In the Order, the Commission found that, 

from October 2011 through December 2015, BlueCrest engaged in a course of conduct stemming 

from its management of BSMA that was detrimental to investors in BlueCrest’s flagship client 

hedge fund, BlueCrest Capital International (“BCI”). The Commission ordered the Respondent 

to pay $107,560,200 in disgorgement, $25,154,306 in prejudgment interest, and a $37,285,494 

civil money penalty, for a total of $170,000,000, to the Commission. The Commission also 

created a Fair Fund, pursuant to Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, so the 

 

1

 Securities Act Rel. No. 10896 (Dec. 8, 2020).
2

penalty paid, along with the disgorgement and interest paid, can be distributed to harmed 

investors (the “Fair Fund”).

The Fair Fund includes the $170,000,000.00 paid by the Respondent.

The Division of Enforcement now seeks the appointment of Kurtzman Carson 

Consultants, LLC (“KCC”) as the fund administrator and requests that the administrator’s bond 

be set at $170,000,000. KCC is included in the Commission’s approved pool of administrators.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that KCC is appointed as the fund 

administrator, pursuant to Rule 1105(a) of the Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and 

Disgorgement Plans (“Commission’s Rules”),2 and shall obtain a bond in accordance with Rule 

1105(c) of the Commission’s Rules,3in the amount of $170,000,000.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.4

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

2

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1105(a).

3

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1105(c).

4

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(17).
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 181 (Monday, September 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 58076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23995]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7595]

Designation of The Indian Mujahideen, Also Known as Indian 
Mujahedeen, Also Known as Indian Mujahidin, Also Known as Islamic 
Security Force-Indian Mujahideen (ISF-IM), as a Specially Designated 
Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as 
Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the organization known as the Indian 
Mujahideen, also known as Indian Mujahedeen, also known as Indian 
Mujahidin, also known as Islamic Security Force-Indian Mujahideen (ISF-
IM), committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of 
terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national 
security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: September 6, 2011.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-23995 Filed 9-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
§ 245a.10 Definitions. In this Subpart B, the terms: *Eligible alien* means an alien (including a spouse or child as defined at section 101(b)(1) of the Act of the alien who was such as of the date the alien alleges that he or she attempted to file or was discouraged from filing an application for legalization during the original application period) who, before October 1, 2000, filed with the Attorney General a written claim for class membership, with or without filing fee, pursuant to a court order issued in the case of: ( 1 ) *Catholic Social Services, Inc.* v. *Meese,* vacated sub nom. *Reno* v. *Catholic Social Services, Inc.,* 509 U.S. 43 (1993) (*CSS*);
( 2 ) *League of United Latin American Citizens* v. *INS,* vacated sub nom. *Reno* v. *Catholic Social Services, Inc.,* 509 U.S. 43 (1993) (*LULAC*); or
( 3 ) *Zambrano* v. *INS,* vacated, 509 U.S. 918 (1993) (*Zambrano*).
*Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR)* means the status of having been lawfully accorded the privilege of residing permanently in the United States as an immigrant in accordance with the immigration laws, such status not having changed.
*LIFE Act* means the Legal Immigration Family Equity Act and the LIFE Act Amendments of 2000.
*LIFE Legalization* means the provisions of section 1104 of the LIFE Act and section 1503 of the LIFE Act Amendments.
*Prima facie* means eligibility is established if an “eligible alien” presents a properly filed and completed Form I-485 and specific factual information which in the absence of rebuttal will establish a claim of eligibility under this Subpart B.
*Written claim for class membership* means a filing, in writing, in one of the forms listed in § 245a.14 that provides the Attorney General with notice that the applicant meets the class definition in the cases of *CSS, LULAC* or *Zambrano.*
[66 FR 29673, June 1, 2001, as amended at 67 FR 38350, June 4, 2002; 67 FR 66532, Nov. 1, 2002]
Company Filings

Skip to Main Content
              -  About                  - Careers
                - Commissioners
                - Contact
                - Reports and Publications
                - Securities Laws
                - Mission 
              -  Divisions & Offices                  - Corporation Finance
                - Enforcement
                - Investment Management
                - Economic and Risk Analysis
                - Trading and Markets
                - Examinations
                - Office of Administrative Law Judges
                - Regional Offices
                - All Divisions and Offices 
              -  Enforcement                  - Litigation Releases
                - Administrative Proceedings
                - Opinions and Adjudicatory Orders
                - Accounting and Auditing
                - Trading Suspensions
                - How Investigations Work
                - Receiverships
                - Information for Harmed Investors 
              -  Regulation                  - Rulemaking Index
                - Proposed Rules
                - Final Rules
                - Interim Final Rules
                - Other Orders and Notices
                - Self-Regulatory Organizations
                - Staff Interpretations 
              -  Education                  - Investor.gov
                - Five Questions to Ask Before You Invest
                - About Investment Professionals
                - Check Your Investment Professional
                - Investing Tools and Calculators
                - Investment Products
                - Understanding Fees
                - Investor Alerts and Bulletins
                - Glossary 
              -  Filings                  - EDGAR Search & Access
                - Company Filing Search
                - How to Search EDGAR
                - Requesting Public Documents
                - Forms List
                - Information for Filers
                - About EDGAR 
              -  News                  - Press Releases
                - Speeches and Statements
                - Spotlight Topics
                - Upcoming Events
                - Webcasts
                - SEC in the News
                - SEC Videos
                - Media Gallery 

# Open Meeting Agenda

## Wednesday, March 1, 2017

| **Item 1:** | **Request for Comment on Possible Changes to Industry Guide 3 (Statistical Disclosure by Bank Holding Companies)** |
|-------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Office:     | Division of Corporation Finance                                                                                    |
| Staff:      | James M. Daly, Lindsay McCord, Michael Seaman                                                                      |
||
### §576d. Expenditure of Supplemental National Forest Reforestation Fund moneys; availability of moneys from other sources unaffected

Moneys transferred to the National Forest Reforestation Fund under the provisions of sections 576c to 576e 1 of this title shall be available to the Secretary of Agriculture, for expenditure upon appropriation, for the purpose of supplementing programs of tree planting and seeding of national forest lands determined by the Secretary to be in need of reforestation. Such moneys shall be available until expended, and shall be provided without prejudice to appropriations or funds available from other sources for the same purposes, including those available pursuant to section 576b of this title.

(Pub. L. 92–421, §2, Sept. 18, 1972, 86 Stat. 678.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 576e of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 96–470, title I, §102(b), Oct. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 2237.

1 See References in Text note below.
**Exhibit 10.27**

 

**AMENDMENT 2005-1**

**TO THE**

**HILTON HOTELS EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN**

 

THIS AMENDMENT 2005-1 ismade this 20th day of December, 2005, by Hilton Hotels Corporation, a Delawarecorporation (the “Company”).

 

WHEREAS, the Company hasestablished and maintains the Hilton Hotels Executive Deferred CompensationPlan (the “1997 Plan”) for the benefit of its eligible employees; and

 

WHEREAS, the Companydesires to amend Section 4.2 of the 1997 Plan, in accordance with itsauthority with respect thereto, to provide that Company Contributions (asdefined in the 1997 Plan) that were not earned and vested for purposes of section 409Aof the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) as of December 31,2004 are to be transferred to the Hilton Hotels 2005 Executive DeferredCompensation Plan (the “2005 Plan”) as of January 1, 2005 and that theterms of the 2005 Plan shall govern the Company Contributions in all respects.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the 1997 Planis amended as follows:

 

1.  Effective as of January 1, 2005, Section 4.2is hereby amended to add the following provision after the end of the existing Section 4.2:

 

Notwithstanding theforegoing, effective as of January 1, 2005, for each Participant who had CompanyContributions under the Plan that were not earned and vested for purposes of section 409Aof the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) as of December 31,2004, those Company Contributions have been credited to the Participant’sAccount under the Hilton Hotels 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “2005Plan”) as of January 1, 2005 and the terms of the 2005 Plan shall govern thoseCompany Contributions in all respects.

 

----

 

2.  In all respects not amended, the 1997 Plan ishereby ratified and affirmed.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Companyhas caused this Amendment 2005-1 to be executed on the day and year first abovewritten.

 

 
|   | HILTON HOTELS  CORPORATION |
|--------|----------------------------|
|   |                       |
|   |                       |
|   | By:                        | /s/ Molly  McKenzie Swarts |   |
|   |                       |   |
|   | Its:                       | Senior Vice President |   |

 

----
### §541d. Acquisition of property within the scenic-research area; consent of owner; substantial change in use or maintenance of property

#### (a) Acquisition of lands, waters and interests by donation, purchase, etc.

Subject to the provisions of subsection (b) of this subsection,1 the Secretary is authorized to acquire lands, waters, or interests therein within the Area by donation, purchase, exchange, or otherwise.

#### (b) Consent of owner for acquisition of lands in sub-areas; exceptions; guidelines for determination of substantial change in land use or maintenance

Within all subareas of the Area except the estuary and associated wetlands subarea, the Secretary may not acquire any land or interest in land without the consent of the owner or owners so long as the owner or owners use such land for substantially the same purposes and in the same manner as it was used and maintained on June 1, 1974: Provided, however, That the Secretary may acquire any land or interest in land without the consent of the owner or owners when such land is in imminent danger of being used for different purposes or in a different manner from the use or uses existing on June 1, 1974. The Secretary shall publish, within one hundred and eighty days of December 22, 1974, guidelines which shall be used by him to determine what constitutes a substantial change in land use or maintenance for the non-federally-owned lands within the Area. Within the estuary and associated wetlands subarea the Secretary may acquire any land or interest in land without the consent of the owner or owners at any time, after public hearing.

#### (c) Substantial change in land use or maintenance; notice by owner; time; manner

At least thirty days prior to any substantial change in the use or maintenance of any non-federally-owned land within the Area, the owner or owners of such land shall provide notice of such proposed change to the Secretary or his designee, in accordance with such guidelines as the Secretary may establish.

(Pub. L. 93–535, §5, Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1733.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "section,".
#### § 973.100 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to provide definitions for terms used in this part.
EXHIBIT 32.01

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Ocean  Power
Corporation  (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),
Michael Hopper, as Authorized Signatory of the Company,  certifies,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ MICHAEL HOPPER
----------------------------
Name:   Michael Hopper
Title:  Authorized Signatory
Date:   January 31, 2008

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 392.2 Eligibility for posthumous citizenship. ( a ) *General.* Any alien or noncitizen national of the United States is eligible for posthumous United States citizenship who: ( 1 ) Served honorably in an active-duty status with the military, air, or naval forces of the United States during World War I, World War II, the Korean Hostilities, the Vietnam Hostilities, or in other periods of military hostilities designated by the President under Executive Order; and,
( 2 ) Died as a result of injury or disease incurred in or aggravated by service in the United States Armed Forces during a period of military hostilities listed in paragraph (a)(1) of this section. Where the person died subsequent to separation from military service, the death must have resulted from an injury or disease that was sustained, acquired, or exacerbated during active-duty service in a qualifying period of military hostilities as specified in this part.
( b ) *Qualifying enlistment.* In conjunction with the qualifying service as described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the decedent must have: ( 1 ) Enlisted, reenlisted, or been inducted in the United States, the Canal Zone, American Samoa, or Swains Island;
( 2 ) Been lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence, at any time; or,
( 3 ) Enlisted or reenlisted in the United States Army pursuant to the provisions of the Lodge Act. In such case, the decedent shall be considered to have been lawfully admitted to the United States as a permanent resident for purposes of this section, provided he or she: ( i ) Entered the United States, its outlying possessions, or the Canal Zone, at some time during the period of army service, pursuant to military orders; and
( ii ) Was honorably discharged following completion of at least 5 full years of active duty service, even though the active-duty service may not have occurred during a qualifying period of hostilities specified in section 329(a) of the Act.
( c ) *Character of military service.* Where the character of military service is not certified as honorable by the executive department under which the person served, or where the person was dishonorably discharged or discharged under conditions other than honorable, such service shall not satisfy the requirement of paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( d ) *Certification of eligibility.* ( 1 ) The executive department under which the decedent served shall determine whether: ( i ) The decedent served honorably in an active-duty status;
( ii ) The separation from such service was under honorable conditions; and,
( iii ) The decedent died as a result of injury or disease incurred in, or aggravated by active duty service during a qualifying period of military hostilities.
( 2 ) The certification required by section 329A(c)(2) of the Act to prove military service and service-connected death must be requested by the applicant on the form designated by USCIS in accordance with the form instructions. The form will also be used to verify the decedent's place of induction, enlistment, or reenlistment.
[56 FR 22822, May 17, 1991, as amended at 76 FR 53806, Aug. 29, 2011]
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications.
**Title: ****Final  environmental impact statement for hydropower license : Upper  Drum-Spaulding Hydroelectric Project--FERC project no. 2310-193, Lower Drum  Hydroelectric Project--FERC project no. 14531-000, Deer Creek Hydroelectic Project--FERC project no. 14530-000,  Yuba-Bear Hydroelectric Project--FERC project no. 2266-102, California
Volume  1  |  Volume  2
SuDocs No. E 2.11:0244/V.1-2 | Item  No. 0429-V-17 | System No. 000942528
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

 
 
 
Last updated:  September 24,  2016  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov/
 ** |
|--|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6819

WAY’LON LEVAR HARRIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-01-726-2)

Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 25, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Way’Lon Levar Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Way’Lon Levar Harris seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2002). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. See Harris v. Angelone, No. CA-01-

726-2 (E.D. Va. filed May 13, 2002; entered May 14, 2002). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED