alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 93082 / September 20, 2021

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension of trading 

in the securities of the following issuer, commencing at 9:30 a.m. EDT on September 21, 2021 

and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on October 4, 2021:

 Skye Life Ventures Ltd. (SKLV)

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of the foregoing company due 

to a lack of current and accurate information about the company because it has not filed certain 

periodic reports with the Commission. This order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).

The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by this company.

Brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11, at 

the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered relating to the securities 

of the subject company unless and until the broker or dealer has strictly complied with all of the 

provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by the rule, it 

should refrain from entering quotations relating to the securities of this company that has been 

subject to a trading suspension until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is 

certain that all of its provisions have been met. Any broker or dealer with questions regarding

the rule should contact the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, DC 

at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of the rule,

the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action. 

If any broker, dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, they 

should immediately communicate it to the Delinquent Filings Branch of the Division of 

Enforcement at (202) 551-5466, or by e-mail at DelinquentFilings@sec.gov.
#### W. L. Connon, Plaintiff in Error, v. Florence M. Spofford, Defendant in Error.

Gen. No. 15,368.

*Verdicts—when not disturbed as against the evidence.*A verdict will not be set aside on review as against the evidence unless clearly and manifestly against its weight.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. H. H. Kerr, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1909.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 24, 1911.

M. L. Thackaberry, for plaintiff in error.

Robert J. Slater, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff in error, W. L. Connon, brought an action in the Municipal Court of Chicago against the defendant in error, Florence M. Spofford, to recover damages alleged to have been caused by the defendant in error by running her automobile into the horse and buggy of the plaintiff and injuring his horse. The cause was tried before the court without a jury, and the defendant had judgment.

No questions of law are involved. The sole question before us is one of fact, namely: was the defendant in the action guilty of negligence which caused the injury to plaintiff’s property?

*537We have carefully read and considered the evidence, and the arguments of counsel, and we are unable to say that the finding and judgment of the trial court is manifestly against the weight of the evidence. In our opinion the preponderance of the evidence sustains the judgment.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE RELATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH ON THE JOINT ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000048595
<NAME> STARWOOD LODGING TRUST
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1994
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       4,810,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,965,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,375,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      51,353,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (16,877,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,626,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,704,000
<BONDS>                                     40,664,000
<COMMON>                                     1,213,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,955,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,626,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           110,962,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              107,765,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,324,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,071,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,198,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,198,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,198,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,198,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4849 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the exclusion 

for educational assistance programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 23, 2019 

Mr. SMITH of Missouri (for himself and Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the exclusion for educational assistance programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Upward Mobility En5 hancement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN EXCLUSION FOR EDUCATIONAL AS7 SISTANCE PROGRAMS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 127(a) 

9 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read 

10 as follows: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4849 IH

1 ‘‘(2) MAXIMUM EXCLUSION.— 

2 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—This section shall 

3 apply only to the first $11,500 of educational 

4 assistance furnished to an individual during a 

5 calendar year, in the case of assistance for edu6 cation below the graduate level. 

7 ‘‘(B) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—In the 

8 case of any calendar year after 2019, the dollar 

9 amount in subparagraph (A) shall be increased 

10 by an amount equal to— 

11 ‘‘(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

12 ‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de13 termined under section 1(f)(3) for the cal14 endar year in which such taxable year be15 gins by substituting ‘calendar year 2017’ 

16 for ‘calendar year 2016’ in subparagraph 

17 (A)(ii) thereof. 

18 If any increase determined under this subpara19 graph is not a multiple of $50, such increase 

20 shall be rounded to the next lowest multiple of 

21 $50.’’. 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

23 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

24 December 31, 2018. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4738 

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to provide protections against 

pregnancy discrimination in the workplace, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 18, 2019 

Mr. WALBERG (for himself, Mrs. WAGNER, Ms. STEFANIK, and Mrs. 

WALORSKI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to provide protections 

against pregnancy discrimination in the workplace, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pregnancy Discrimina5 tion Amendment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROTECTIONS AGAINST PREGNANCY DISCRIMINA7 TION IN THE WORKPLACE. 

8 Section 701(k) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 

9 U.S.C. 2000e(k)) is amended in the first sentence, by 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4738 IH

1 striking ‘‘as other persons not so affected but similar in 

2 their ability’’ and inserting ‘‘as any other applicants for 

3 employment with, or employees employed by, the same em4 ployer, in work that is performed under similar working 

5 conditions, who are not so affected but similar in their 

6 temporary ability’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### C. J. Stevens et al., appellees, v. Horace A. Burnham et al., appellants.

Filed October 16, 1901.

No. 10,206.

1. Mechanic’s Lien: Tenant: Landlord. A tenant can not, without the authority or consent of his landlord, charge the leased premises with a lien, for material used in the construction of a building thereon.

3. -: -: Agricultural Fixture: Evidence. In the absence of evidence showing' that such building was not permanently annexed to the soil, or that it was intended as a mere agricultural fixture, it can not be treated as the tenant’s property and subjected to a lien in favor of the person furnishing the materials used in its construction.

3. Trade Fixture: Right of Removal. The right of a tenant, or of those claiming through or under him, to remove a trade or agricultural fixture from the leased premises, expires with -the tenancy. ’

Appeal from the district court for Custer county. Heard below before Westover, J.

*Reversed.*

*Kirkpatrick & Hager,*for appellants.

*Augustus R. Humphrey, contra.*

Sullivan, J.

There has been in this court no attempt to defend the judgment appealed from, and it seems to us to be indefensible. The action was brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien upon a quarter section of land in Ouster county. The asserted right to a lien is based upon a sale of lumber which was used in the construction of a barn. The lumber was bought and the bam built by Horace A. Burnham in *6731893 while he was living upon and farming the land. The appellants, S. H. Burnham and S.' W. Burnham, contend that they are the legal and equitable owners of the farm and deny that they gave any authority for the purchase of the lumber or the erection of the barn. The evidence fully sustained this contention and the trial court, therefore, refused to give the plaintiffs a lien on the land. It did, however, give them a lien on the barn on the theory, we suppose, that it was a removable fixture. There are two reasons why the decree can not stand. In the first place there is not a particle of evidence tending to prove that the barn was not permanently' annexed to the soil, or that it was intended to be a mere agricultural fixture. But even if it were a removable structure, the right to remove it did not survive the tenancy of Horace A. Burnham. The right to sever and remove perished when the tenancy expired. Such is the import of our decisions. *Friedlander v. Ryder,*30 Nebr., 783; *Free v. Stuart,*39 Nebr., 220; *Fuller v. Brownell,*48 Nebr., 145.

The judgment is reversed and the action dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.
### §7143a. Amounts obligated but unspent; prohibition on use of funds

#### (a) Amounts obligated but unspent

Any county funds that were obligated by the applicable participating county before October 1, 2017, but are unspent on October 1, 2020—

(1) may, at the option of the participating county, be deemed to have been reserved by the participating county on October 1, 2020, for expenditure in accordance with this subchapter; and

(2)(A) may be used by the participating county for any authorized use under section 7142(a) of this title; and

(B) on a determination by the participating county under subparagraph (A) to use the county funds, shall be available for projects initiated after October 1, 2020, subject to section 7144 of this title.

#### (b) Prohibition on use of funds

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, effective beginning on November 15, 2021, no county funds made available under this subchapter may be used by any participating county for any lobbying activity, regardless of the purpose for which the funds are obligated on or before that date.

(Pub. L. 106–393, title III, §304, as added Pub. L. 117–58, div. D, title XII, §41202(g)(2), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1134.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 304 of Pub. L. 106–393 was renumbered section 305 and is classified to section 7144 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Wage Rate Requirements

For provisions relating to rates of wages to be paid to laborers and mechanics on projects for construction, alteration, or repair work funded under div. D or an amendment by div. D of Pub. L. 117–58, including authority of Secretary of Labor, see section 18851 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
### §7403. Duties and authorities of the Secretary

#### (a) Regulations

The Secretary may, as needed, promulgate such regulations—

(1) in accordance with section 553 of title 5;

(2) consistent with provisions of this chapter; 1 and

(3) with respect to enforcement measures, in consultation with the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating;

as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter, to the extent that such regulations are not already promulgated.

#### (b) Ports of entry

The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating, may designate and publicize the ports to which vessels may seek entry. No port may be designated under this section that has not also been designated as a port of entry for customs reporting purposes pursuant to section 1433 of title 19 1 or that is not specified under an existing international fisheries agreement.

#### (c) Notification

The Secretary shall provide notification of the denial of port entry or the use of port services for a vessel under section 7404 of this title, the withdrawal of the denial of port services for a foreign vessel, the taking of enforcement action pursuant to section 7405 of this title with respect to a foreign vessel, or the results of any inspection of a foreign vessel conducted pursuant to this chapter to the flag nation of the vessel and, as appropriate, to the nation of which the vessel's master is a national, relevant coastal nations, RFMOs, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, and other relevant international organizations.

#### (d) Confirmation that fish were taken in accordance with conservation and management measures

The Secretary may request confirmation from the flag state of a foreign vessel that the fish on board a foreign vessel in a port subject to the jurisdiction of the United States were taken in accordance with applicable RFMO conservation and management measures.

(Pub. L. 114–81, title III, §304, Nov. 5, 2015, 129 Stat. 665.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a)(2), was in the original "the title" and was translated as meaning "this title" to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Section 1433 of title 19, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original a reference to "section 1433 of title 19, United States Code" but probably should have been a reference to section 433 of the Tariff Act of 1930, act June 17, 1930, ch. 497, which is classified to section 1433 of Title 19, Customs Duties.

1 See References in Text note below.
Q UE S T ION S T O A S K Y OUR S E L F A B OU T Y OUR 

EXERCISE AND PHYSICAL 

ACTIVITY BARRIERS

Chances are, you know you should be more active, but find it hard to fit 

exercise and physical activity into your life. So many things, or barriers, 

can get in the way of being active. 

What barriers keep me from starting or continuing to be active 

on a regular basis? (Select all that apply.)

 I do not have enough time 

to exercise.

 I do not find exercising to 

be convenient.

I am not motivated to 

exercise.

I do not enjoy exercising.

I do not live close to or 

have access to parks, 

sidewalks, bicycle trails or 

safe walking paths.

I fear being injured or have 

been injured recently.

I do not have barriers to 

overcome.

Other: 

What are three strategies I could use to overcome these 

barriers?

1. 

2. 

3.
Motion granted in part and denied in part, and Order filed December 2 , 20 21

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 2 1

- 00 143

- CV

____________ RUHUL AMIN PARVEZ AHMED , Appellant

V.
KHALEDA PARVIN , Appellee

On Appeal from the 505 th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1 9

- DCV

- 264584



### ORDER
Before the court is a motion filed by appellant, proceeding pro se, asking for an extension to January 19, 2022 to file his brief, due to issues associated with
COVID

- 19, a search for a residence, and a supposed discrepancy with the reporter’s
record

. The court hereby grants the motion and orders appellant to file his brief no
later than January 19, 2022 . No further extensions will be granted absent exceptional circumstances. Appellant’s discussion of the reporter’s record merits further discussion in

ass ociation with that request. Appellant claims that his extension is needed because, although he has a copy of the reporter’s record comprising transcriptions of trial2

court proceedings and copies of exhibits used in those proceedings, the record does
not i nclude video clips of those proceedings. The record reflects at least some of the proceedings occurred by Zoom or other methods of videoconference, but although there is no indication that the trial court retained a recording of such proceedings, the repo rter’s record appears to comprise full, true, and correct transcripts of all hearings conducted by the trial court. 1 As appellant has not clarified how videorecordings of the hearings would provide anything applicable to this appeal that is already provi ded by the written reporter’s record, the court sees no need to
take action on that issue.
Finally, appellant has requested counsel be appointed to represent him in this appeal. In civil cases, parties have no general right to counsel. See Travelers Inde m. Co. of Conn. v. Mayfield , 923 S.W.2d 590, 594 (Tex. 1996). Appellant’s motion does not indicate this is an exceptional case warranting the appointment of counsel.
See id. Accordingly, we deny appellant’s request for appointment of counsel.

For the re asons discussed above, the court grants appellant’s motion in part to the extent it requests an extension to file a brief, and denies appellant’s motion in part to the extent it requests appointment of counsel.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Wilson.

1 Although appellant’s motion references an August 19, 2019 hearing for which there is no transcript, the trial court docket and a transcript of the trial court’s August 8, 2019 hearing indicates the August 19th proceeding was simply a meeting between the parties and the trial court to confirm several written temp orary orders (which the trial court signed on August 19th) accurately reflected the trial court’s discussions and pronouncements made at the August 8th hearing. The docket also reflects appellant personally appeared before the trial court on August 19th i n association with those temporary orders.
Case 17-33303-KRH Doc 63 Filed 11/29/21 Entered 11/29/21 19:09:20 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 6
Case 17-33303-KRH Doc 63 Filed 11/29/21 Entered 11/29/21 19:09:20 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 6
Case 17-33303-KRH Doc 63 Filed 11/29/21 Entered 11/29/21 19:09:20 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 6
Case 17-33303-KRH Doc 63 Filed 11/29/21 Entered 11/29/21 19:09:20 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 6
Case 17-33303-KRH Doc 63 Filed 11/29/21 Entered 11/29/21 19:09:20 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 6
Case 17-33303-KRH Doc 63 Filed 11/29/21 Entered 11/29/21 19:09:20 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 6
# Official Journal C 298A/3 De

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 298A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 473 December 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 298A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 473 December 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 298A/2 | Directorate-General ‘Research’ — Publication of a vacancy notice for the position of Director of Directorate RTD.I ‘Environment’ (Grade A*14/A*15) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2004/10560 | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

Commission

2004/C 298A/2

Directorate-General ‘Research’ — Publication of a vacancy notice for the position of Director of Directorate RTD.I ‘Environment’ (Grade A*14/A*15) (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2004/10560

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 668.215 Programming and project procedures. ( a ) The DFDE will advise the applicant in writing which projects in the application, or in any subsequent submittals pursuant to paragraph (c) of § 668.213 are approved including any approval conditions. Approved projects shall constitute the approved program of projects (program).
( b ) Plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) shall be developed based on work identified in the approved program.
( c ) The DFDE will approve PS&E's, concur in the award of contracts or the rejection of bids, determine that construction by the force account method is in the public interest, and accept completed work in accordance with interagency procedures established by the DFDE.
( d ) The applicant shall notify the DFDE in writing of the semi-annual status and completion of each emergency relief project constructed by applicant forces.
[43 FR 59485, Dec. 21, 1978, as amended at 47 FR 10529, Mar. 11, 1982]