alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §645. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, R.S. §1957; acts June 6, 1900, ch. 786, §4, 31 Stat. 322; Feb. 14, 1903, ch. 552, §7, 32 Stat. 828; Mar. 3, 1909, ch. 269, §2, 35 Stat. 839; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736; Mar. 2, 1921, ch. 110, 41 Stat. 1203; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. II, §4(e), eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2731, 53 Stat. 1433, related to jurisdiction of offenses.
(54 South. 794.)

No. 18,686.

#### STATE v. PECARINO.

(March 27, 1911.)

*(Syllabus by the Court.)*

Criminal Law (§§ 938, 958*) — New Trial— Newly Discovered Evidence.

A motion for a new trial is properly refused, when based on evidence that could have been produced at the trial by the exercise of due diligence, or on mere negative evidence that would not probably have affected the result, or on the affidavit of the accused, not corroborated by that of alleged newly discovered witnesses.

[Ed. Note. — Eor other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2306-2317, 2396-2403; Dec. Dig. §§ 938, 958.*]

Appeal from Fifteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Calcasieu; Winston Over-ton, Judge.

Vito Peearino was convicted of selling intoxicating liquors, and appeals.

Affirmed.

John B. Kent, for appellant. Walter Guión, A tty. Gen., and Joseph Moore, Dist. Atty. (G. A. Gondran, of counsel), for the State.

LAND, J.

The accused appeals from a conviction and sentence for unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors in the prohibition parish of Calcasieu, and assigns as error the overruling of his motion for a new trial.

The court overruled said motion because the verdict was according to the law and the evidence, and for the further reason that the alleged newly discovered evidence was negative in its character, and some of it could have been produced on the trial of the cause.

The bill of exception does not set forth the evidence adduced on the trial, and we are therefore unable to say'that the alleged newly discovered evidence would have affected the result. The affidavit of the accused was not corroborated by that of any of the alleged newly discovered witnesses.

It is therefore ordered that the sentence below be affirmed. .
Order entered March 31, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00685
- CV
ASSOCIATED AIR CENTE R LP, ET AL, Appellant s V. TARY NETWORK, LTD, E T AL, Appellee s On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas Co unty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10
- 01620 

### O RDER
W e GRANT appellees’ March 28, 2014 unopposed motion for additional extension of time to file brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than April 28, 2014. No further extensions will be granted absent e xigent circumstances

.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
### §718j. Definitions

#### (a) In general

In this subchapter, the terms defined in the Migratory Bird Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 715 et seq.) and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.) have the meanings given those terms in those Acts.

#### (b) Other definitions

In this subchapter:

#### (1) Hunting year

The term "hunting year" means the 1-year period beginning on July 1 of each year.

#### (2) Migratory waterfowl

The term "migratory waterfowl" means the species enumerated in paragraph (a) of subdivision 1 of article I of the Convention between the United States and Great Britain for the Protection of Migratory Birds, signed at Washington on August 16, 1916 (USTS 628) (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.).

#### (3) Secretary

The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Interior.

#### (4) State

The term "State" means—

(A) a State;

(B) the District of Columbia;

(C) the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico;

(D) Guam;

(E) American Samoa;

(F) the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands;

(G) the Federated States of Micronesia;

(H) the Republic of the Marshall Islands;

(I) the Republic of Palau; and

(J) the United States Virgin Islands.

#### (5) Take

The term "take" means—

(A) to pursue, hunt, shoot, capture, collect, or kill; or

(B) to attempt to pursue, hunt, shoot, capture, collect, or kill.

(Mar. 16, 1934, ch. 71, §10, as added Pub. L. 109–266, §10(h), Aug. 3, 2006, 120 Stat. 678.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Migratory Bird Conservation Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is act Feb. 18, 1929, ch. 257, 45 Stat. 1222, which is classified generally to subchapter III (§715 et seq.) of chapter 7 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 715 of this title and Tables.

The Migratory Bird Treaty Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is act July 3, 1918, ch. 128, 40 Stat. 755, which is classified generally to subchapter II (§703 et seq.) of chapter 7 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 710 of this title and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 718j, Mar. 16, 1934, ch. 71, §10, as added Pub. L. 97–307, Oct. 14, 1982, 96 Stat. 1450, related to crediting of funds received as fees for entering migratory-bird hunting and conservation stamp contest prior to repeal by Pub. L. 109–266, §10(h), Aug. 3, 2006, 120 Stat. 677.
### ozone docket--OMB Jan King to: Sherry Russell 07/27/2011 01:58 PM 

### Jan King Regulatory Development and Policy Analysis Group phone: (919) 541-5665 fax: (919) 541-2664 Mailcode: C404-05
----- Forwarded by Jan King/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/27/2011 01:58 PM -----

From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine

_ J.

_ Kymn@omb.eop.gov> Cc: Deirdre Murphy/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Nealson Watkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lewis Weinstock/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, David Orlin/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jan King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Margaret Morrison/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 07/26/2011 01:53 PM Subject: CO meeting on Friday morning at 9:30? 

### Christine, Based on my survey of our folks, it seems that people will be available for a CO interagency meeting on Friday at or after 9:30 AM. You had said you'd like to have it early in the day, so I'm proposing 9:30 as the time. Is that OK with you? If so, Margaret will send you a schedule notice and a phone call-in number. Thanks.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                      0
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            0
<PP&E>                                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  16,395
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                1,018
<OTHER-SE>                                            (17,413)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                0
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            0
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       16,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (16,300)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (16,300)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (16,300)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.02)



</TABLE>
Case 18-03003-KRH Doc 81 Filed 09/04/18 Entered 09/05/18 11:22:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1884/2005

of 17 November 2005         

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the import of maize issued in Regulation (EC) No 1808/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 11 to 17 November 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the reduction in the duty on imported maize issued in Regulation (EC) No 1808/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 18 November 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 November 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

(2)OJ L 291, 5.11.2005, p. 3.

(3)OJ L 177, 28.7.1995, p. 4. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1558/2005 (OJ L 249, 24.9.2005, p. 6).

----
§ 200.74 Use of an alternative method to distribute grants to LEAs with fewer than 20,000 residents. ( a ) For eligible LEAs serving an area with a total census population of less than 20,000 persons (hereinafter referred to as “small LEAs”), an SEA may apply to the Secretary to use an alternative method to distribute basic grant, concentration grant, targeted grant, and education finance incentive grant funds.
( b ) In its application, the SEA must— ( 1 ) Identify the alternative data it proposes to use; and
( 2 ) Assure that it has established a procedure through which a small LEA that is dissatisfied with the determination of its grant may appeal directly to the Secretary.
( c ) The SEA must base its alternative method on population data that best reflect the current distribution of children from low-income families among the State's small LEAs and use the same poverty measure consistently for small LEAs across the State for all Title I, part A programs.
( d ) Based on the alternative poverty data selected, the SEA must— ( 1 ) Re-determine eligibility of its small LEAs for basic grants, concentration grants, targeted grants, and education finance incentive grants in accordance with § 200.71;
( 2 ) Calculate allocations for small LEAs in accordance with the provisions of sections 1124, 1124A, 1125, and 1125A of the ESEA, as applicable; and
( 3 ) Ensure that each LEA receives the hold-harmless amount to which it is entitled under § 200.73.
( e ) The amount of funds available for redistribution under each formula is the separate amount determined by the Secretary under sections 1124, 1124A, 1125, and 1125A of the ESEA for eligible small LEAs after the SEA has made the adjustments required under § 200.72(c).
( f ) If the amount available for redistribution to small LEAs under an alternative method is not sufficient to satisfy applicable hold-harmless requirements, the SEA must ratably reduce all eligible small LEAs to the amount available.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 6333-6337)
[82 FR 31711, July 7, 2017]
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 459 

To constitute the majority party’s membership on certain committees for 

the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress, or until their successors are chosen. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 19, 2019 

Mr. MCCONNELL submitted the following resolution; which was considered 

and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To constitute the majority party’s membership on certain 

committees for the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress, 

or until their successors are chosen. 

1 Resolved, That the following shall constitute the ma2 jority party’s membership on the following committee for 

3 the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress, or until their suc4 cessors are chosen: 

5 SELECT COMMITTEE ON ETHICS: Mr. Lankford 

6 (Chairman), Mr. Roberts, Mr. Risch. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ellis Levi, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.
!!"#$

%%"&'

&
()'!)

*+%+++



	




	
	






	
	







 !

!


"#$#% ! %$&'()**+,("


	

-	# ! %./012/34
/!

!

5/$ !







	6	



--
	

,

(-
.
//(07/12
))/(.
/3&
/)'

&
)'/)45/(0
./%
%/1)'/
)!//(

$
//(//(//)/
'/(
)2)'2/6)/(.
/)'	7.8)
/(

0	//3/1
)29)'/2)')/(2/)/
/9/(

'/
9/(

:)/')/
'2);
/
//9/('2/
$(
/(
<='7
>)))'<!/

8);8)
:)//(0/%/1?/(
2)!)2:
/)//(&
/)'&
)'/)

9/


)''/)/
/(
92)!
=''?)'9
!'
(6)/(
2



96@

% .(&
/)'&
)'/)


)'

?

 .(.
/2)'(
2/(
A'//;
)2/)

/

99
///(96)!
/)2)'2/6)/(//96@

 B%C+++9/(	7.//)/D)''9)')/(&
/)'

&
)'/)(2
/'//(//9<!/8);8)
/(0/%/1)'

Case 18-30056-KLP Doc 100 Filed 02/18/20 Entered 02/18/20 08:23:18 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 4
BC+++9/(	7.//)/D)'2
/'//(//9<='$(
/(


7
>))/(0-/%/1?)'

2 .(.
/3
9)9)'E)
9
)


')/(

'=

"

')!'9)')/(&
/)'&
)'/)(2
/')/(



)/!2/(	7.//)/D)')CF//(<88//)'

CF//(7
>))//2:
///($
/3
=96)!


/)

)'(
)!/(
)?

 .(
)/)'
&G+%H%>/9
)'96)


))
/)6/(/(7/)6='?)'

 .($
/(
/):
'
/)=
))'
/9/(:)/

')/
'
)'/(
/)
='(
)

</'@&
()'!) IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

IIIIIIIIIII+%G JK8.<..	KJ".$L-J<>

8DM&.,8@

  NN  
  

	

	

"#L	&M$8MJ 	8>>"#$

%%"&'

&
()'!)

	




KK<KMM	-$.8MK@

  NN  

  

()))D"


	*

M99
9/(J.
/

+%/	
'/
//+

&
()'!)%G

			



2

Feb 14 2020

/s/ Keith L. Phillips

Entered on Docket: Feb 18 2020

Case 18-30056-KLP Doc 100 Filed 02/18/20 Entered 02/18/20 08:23:18 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 4



	-


"
"


"8*99(&1!

8(
2

/9/(//(9
!)!
'M
'
(2))'
'2

=')

)


/

  NN  
  

$)

	"/

	



	

 	!!"#$

%%"&'

&
()'!)

,

(-
.
/

)M6)! ("$

*CC+7)'<
=

&
()'!)G

))/(K(/(
/888

/)/J)/'//.
/

MDD8$MD.,JK8.<...&J.

K
9;D'
	')!&C

++>
)2/
/

K
9;!)C%+

()))D"




MDD8$MD.,JK8.<...&J.

+%/	
'/
/H/+

&
()'!)%G

$(
/(
<='7
>))

"M	E%G%

"/
2
!!)*+

<!/8);8)



N$(
/(
<='7
>))

"M	E%G%

"/
2
!!)*+

,)/
&

$KD8#<## &J$##"

%"
(&'

3

Case 18-30056-KLP Doc 100 Filed 02/18/20 Entered 02/18/20 08:23:18 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 4
,)

!)* 

4

Case 18-30056-KLP Doc 100 Filed 02/18/20 Entered 02/18/20 08:23:18 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 4
#### §§ 222.144-222.149 [Reserved]
### §460qqq–1. Definitions

In this subchapter:

#### (1) Conservation Area

The term "Conservation Area" means the Sloan Canyon National Conservation Area established by section 460qqq–2(a) of this title.

#### (2) Federal parcel

The term "Federal parcel" means the parcel of Federal land consisting of approximately 500 acres that is identified as Tract A on the map entitled "Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act" and dated October 1, 2002.

#### (3) Management plan

The term "management plan" means the management plan for the Conservation Area developed under section 460qqq–3(b) of this title.

#### (4) Map

The term "map" means the map entitled "Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act" and dated October 1, 2002.

(Pub. L. 107–282, title VI, §603, Nov. 6, 2002, 116 Stat. 2009.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

Pub. L. 107–282, §3, Nov. 6, 2002, 116 Stat. 1995, provided that:

"In this Act [see Short Title note set out under section 460qqq of this title]:

"(1) Agreement.—The term 'Agreement' means the Agreement entitled 'Interim Cooperative Management Agreement Between the United States of the Interior Bureau of Land Management and Clark County', dated November 4, 1992.

"(2) County.—The term 'County' means Clark County, Nevada.

"(3) Secretary.—The term 'Secretary' means—

"(A) the Secretary of Agriculture with respect to land in the National Forest System; or

"(B) the Secretary of the Interior, with respect to other Federal land.

"(4) State.—The term 'State' means the State of Nevada."
EXHIBIT 32.1

BIODELIVERY SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark A. Sirgo, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Mark A. Sirgo                                               
|Mark A. Sirgo President and
Chief Executive Officer May 10, 2010
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Frank W. Kridel, Appellant and Respondent, against James J. Sexton et al., as Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments of the City of New York, Respondents and Appellants. (Block 1890, Lot 24, for years 1930 and 1931). The People of the State of New York ex rel. Malex Realty Corporation, Appellant and Respondent, against James J. Sexton et al., as Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments of the City of New York, Respondents and Appellants. (Block 1890, Lot 24, for tax year 1929).

No opinion. Present ■—• Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

DONTE M. PATTERSON

NO. 2024 KW 0052

FEBRUARY 26, 2024

In Re: Donte M. Patterson, applying for supervisory writs, 

22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, 

No. 576674, 593630. 

BEFORE: THERIOT, PENZATO, AND GREENE, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

MRT

AHP

HG
### A preliminary report on the Precambrian iron deposits near Atlantic City, Wyoming

By: Richard W. Bayley

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1142C

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven CARR, a/k/a Steven D. Carr, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-4740.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 9, 2002.

Decided May 17, 2002.

Robert A. Ratliff, Roberts, Shields, Green, Landry & Ratliff, Mobile, Alabama, for Appellant. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., United States Attorney, D. Scott Broyles, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

*922Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Steven D. Carr was found guilty following a jury trial of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine base (Count 1), two counts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base and aiding and abetting (Counts 4 and 5), and possession with intent to distribute cocaine base (Count 6). This court affirmed Carr’s convictions on direct appeal, but vacated his sentence and remanded for resentencing in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). *United States v. Carr,*No. 00-4001, 2000 WL 1616978 (4th Cir. OctSO, 2000) (unpublished). On remand, the district court resentenced Carr to a total of 360 months of imprisonment. Specifically, the district court sentenced him to 240 months on Count 1; five years on each of Counts 4 and 5 to run concurrently to each other and consecutively to the sentence imposed in Count 1; and five years on Count 6 to run consecutively to the sentence imposed in Count 1. We now affirm Carr’s sentence.

On appeal, Carr contends that the district court erred in concluding that he was responsible for at least 1.5 kilograms of cocaine base. The district court’s determination of the drug quantity attributable to a defendant is a factual finding reviewed for clear error. *United States v. Randall,*171 F.3d 195, 210 (4th Cir.1999). We have reviewed the testimony and we find no clear error in the district court’s determination that Carr distributed more than 1.5 kilograms of cocaine base, thus assigning him a base offense level of thirty-eight. *See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*§ 2D1.1(c)(1) (2000).

Accordingly, we affirm Carr’s sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Q Comm International,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Terry D. Kramer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

     A signed  original  of this  written  statement  has been  provided  to the
Company and will be retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its
staff upon request.


/s/ Terry D. Kramer
-------------------

Terry D. Kramer
Chief Executive Officer

July 30, 2004


This  certification  accompanies  the  above-described  Report  on  Form  10-QSB
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except
to the extent  required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.