alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### From: **Ferd Scaccetti, NJDEP**

**To: Rich LaShier (EPA), cc: Bob Haggerty, ASTSWMO**  **Sent: October 20, 2008 2:36 PM**  **Subject: New Jersey Response to Questions on CBI Policy for Manifests** 

Rich, My responses to the survey ( New Jersey); 1.) a. yes b. approximately 3 - 4 weeks 2.) a. yes (for a fee ), unless they download the information from our website (free). b. no c. approximately 3 - 4 weeks 3.) a. no, treat them the same with CBI claims not being allowed. 4.) a. no F erd Ferdinand Scaccetti Supervisor Hazardous Waste Manifest Section NJDEP (609) 984 - 2162 (609) 633 - 9839 - fax
###### Editorial Note on Part 1003

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1003 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10350, Mar. 5, 2003.

#### § 1003.36 Record of proceeding.

The Immigration Court shall create and control the Record of Proceeding.

[52 FR 2936, Jan. 29, 1987. Redesignated at 57 FR 11571, Apr. 6, 1992, as amended at 60 FR 34089, June 30, 1995]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THESE SCHEDULES HAVE BEEN RESTATED TO CONFORM WITH EITF 97-2, AS SUCH, REVENUES
AND EXPENSES OF NON-OWNED MANAGED HOTELS ARE NO LONGER INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

EPS HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 128, AND BASIC AND DILUTED EPS
HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN THE PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED LINE ITEMS, RESPECTIVELY.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000048595
<NAME> STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             219
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,941
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   485
<PP&E>                                           4,480
<DEPRECIATION>                                     233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,495
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              418
<BONDS>                                            591
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              170
<PREFERRED>                                          5
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,198
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,495
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   256
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       81
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    158
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                157
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       157
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.79
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4806 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4806

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Controlled Substances Act to authorize the debarment of 
              certain registrants, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Debarment Enforcement of Bad Actor 
Registrants Act of 2020'' or the ``DEBAR Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. DEBARMENT OF CERTAIN REGISTRANTS.

    Section 304 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 824) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) The Attorney General may issue an order to prohibit, 
conditionally or unconditionally, and permanently or for such period as 
the Attorney General may determine, any person from being registered 
under this title to manufacture, distribute, or dispense a controlled 
substance or a list I chemical, if the Attorney General finds that--
            ``(1) such person meets or has met any of the conditions 
        for suspension or revocation of registration under subsection 
        (a); and
            ``(2) such person has a history of prior suspensions or 
        revocations of registration.''.

SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 17, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4806

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Controlled Substances Act to authorize the debarment of 
              certain registrants, and for other purposes.
```
**EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Kurt R. Moore, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annualreport on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) of Ablest Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.         */s/ Kurt R. Moore*   Kurt R. Moore   President and Chief Executive Officer   Date: April 25, 2007
#### Charles S. Scholen, as Administrator of the Estate of Frederick B. Aebly, Deceased, v. Guaranty Trust Company of New York.

Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 4 I 0 1 52

. DI ANE MARI E GNAM v
. ESTATE OF J A MES G. W HI TE et a l

.

I n this equ itable in t e r p l e a d er c ase, t he Estate of J ames G. W hite a nd Ric hard

O. W hite f

iled a mo tio n to set asid e a c o nsent def au lt j u d gment and o p en the d ef au lt.

The trial c o u rt granted the mo tio n o n M arc h 1 , 2024; o n M arc h 7 , 2024, the c o urt

c ertif ied its o rd er fo r immed iate rev iew

. On M arc h 1 9 , 2024, D iane Gnam f iled this

ap p lic atio n seek ing to ap p eal the c o u rt’ s o rd er. W e, ho w ev er, lac k j u risd ic tio n.
Und er OCGA § 5- 6

- 34 (b), a p arty may requ est interlo c u to ry rev iew o nly if the

trial c o u rt c ertif

ies w ithin ten d ays o f entry o f the o rd e r a t issu e that immed iate rev iew

sho u ld be had

. The ap p lic atio n to this Co u rt then mu s t b e mad e “ w ithin ten days af ter

su c h certif

ic ate is granted

. ” I d

. A c ert i f i c a t e of immed iate rev iew is c onsid ered granted o n the d ate that it is f iled w ith the c lerk o f c o urt. 1 See Tu rn er v

. Ha rper , 231

Ga. 1 7 5 , 17 6 ( 200 SE2d 7 48) ( 1 9 7 3); La u ren s C o u n ty v. D i

x o n , 1 33 Ga. A p p

. 7 27 , 7 28 (21 3 SE2d 26 ) (1 9 75). The requ irements o f OCGA § 5- 6

- 34 (b) are j urisd ic tio nal, and

if the p arty seek ing interlo c u to ry rev iew d o es no t co mp ly w ith these requ irements, the

p arty mu st w ait until f

inal j u d gment to ap p eal. See Is la mkha n v

. Kha n , 29 9 Ga. 548,

551 (2) (7 87 SE2d 7 31 ) (201 6 ).

1 Gnam has inc lu d ed a c o p y o f an email f

ro m the d ep u ty c lerk o f

c o u rt stating

t h a t t h e c ertif

ic ate o f immed iate rev iew w as no t “ sc anned into the system” and d istribu ted to the atto rneys u ntil M arc h 1 1 , 2024. Ho wev er, the d u e date o f an ap p lic atio n f

o r i n t e r lo c u to ry a p p eal is no t c alc u lated f ro m t he d ate o f serv ic e o f the

c ertif ic ate o f immed iate rev iew u p o n the a p p lic ant; it is c alc ulated f ro m the d ate the

c ertif ic ate w a s f

iled w ith the c o u rt. See OCGA § 5- 6 -34 (b). April 17, 2024H ere, bec au s e Gnam f iled this ap p lic atio n 1 2 days af ter the trial co u rt entered

its

c ertif ic ate o f immed iate rev iew
, it is u ntimely. See Gra v es v

. D ea n , 1 6 6 G a. A p p

. 186 (303 SE2d 7 51 ) (1 983). A c c ord ingly, this ap p lic atio n is hereby D ISM I SSED

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a ls o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g ia
C le r k ’ s O ffic e , A t la n t a ,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t ify t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t

r u e e x t r a c t fr o m

t h e m in u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A pp e a ls o f G e o r g ia

. W it n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a id c o u r t h e r e t o a ffix e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r la s t a b o v e w r

it t e n

.

, C le r

k

. 04/17/2024
#### § 90.32 Reimbursement request.

Each year for which funds are available for the Tribal Reimbursement Program, the Office on Violence Against Women (OVW) will issue a Notice of Reimbursement Opportunity with instructions on how to apply for the maximum allowable reimbursement. The reimbursement request for each participating Tribe will include a certification that the participating Tribe meets the eligibility requirements of § 90.31. It will also include a list of expenses that the participating Tribe incurred in exercising STCJ in the previous year, in categories such as law enforcement, prosecution, indigent defense, pre-trial services, corrections, and probation. If a participating Tribe has newly implemented tribal criminal jurisdiction over non-Indians and therefore cannot submit 12 months' worth of expenses for the prior year, the participating Tribe may use estimated amounts for each category of expenses.
United States Department of Agriculture USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Dig In! • Grades 5-6 • http://teamnutrition.usda.gov

67

Dark-Green Leafy Vegetable Taster(Page 1 of 2) LESSON 2 HANDOUT 2 

Spinach Fun Facts

• Fuel up with spinach to eat

 smart and play hard. It’s packed

 with vitamin A, which helps keep

 your eyes and skin healthy. It also

 contains other nutrients your body

 needs, such as vitamin C, folate,

 and the mineral potassium.

• Fresh spinach is a tasty way 

 to make your salad or sandwich

 a little greener. Thawed frozen

 spinach is great mixed with

 tomato sauce for pasta or as 

 a topping on pizza.

• California, Arizona, Texas, and

 New Jersey grow the most 

 spinach in the United States!

• Recipes with “Florentine” in 

 their name contain spinach, 

 such as “Eggs Florentine.”

Name: ____________________________________________ Date: _______________

The Vegetable Food Group has five vegetable subgroups. One of these subgroups is called the Dark-Green Vegetable 

Subgroup. Vegetables in this group all provide the same kinds of nutrients; that’s why they are grouped together. 

To eat smart and play hard, we need to eat dark-green vegetables every week. 

Which have you tried? Circle: 

 spinach green leaf lettuce bok choy kale broccoli
United States Department of Agriculture USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Dig In! • Grades 5-6 • http://teamnutrition.usda.gov

68

LESSON 2 HANDOUT 2 Dark-Green Leafy Vegetable Taster (Page 2 of 2)

Name: ____________________________________________ Date: _______________

Taste

1) Write down and draw the leafy greens you will taste below.

2) Before you taste, write down your observations about each sample.

3) Taste and chew each sample slowly using all your senses. Write down 

 what you taste. You may want to use some of these adjectives to help you: 

 crunchy, sweet, salty, peppery, fresh, earthy, crisp, soft. 

Remember your class’s Tasting Etiquette Guidelines!

1. Dark-green leafy vegetable: ____________________________________

 Observation (color, texture, size, shape): ____________________________

 Taste: _________________________________________________________

 Dressing (________________________) Taste: ________________________ 

 Dressing (________________________) Taste: ________________________ 

 Dressing (________________________) Taste: ________________________

2. Dark-green leafy vegetable: ____________________________________

 Observation (color, texture, size, shape): ____________________________

 Taste: _________________________________________________________

 Dressing (________________________) Taste: ________________________ 

 Dressing (________________________) Taste: ________________________ 

 Dressing (________________________) Taste: ________________________

Reflect and Create 

(Answer the following questions in your Garden Journals.)

1) Have you ever eaten any of the dark-green leafy vegetables you just tried at home?

2) What dark-green leafy vegetables have you eaten at school?

3) How could you add dark-green leafy vegetables to your lunch? To your dinner? To a snack?
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         450,637
<SECURITIES>                                   992,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  605,196
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (15,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,186,883
<PP&E>                                         268,451
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (67,743)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,830,594
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,416,288
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,667,026
<COMMON>                                        14,875
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,830,594
<SALES>                                      2,226,778
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,226,778
<CGS>                                          542,001
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,495,492
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (195,615)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (615,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (615,100)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.049)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.046)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VisualMED Clinical Solutions Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A-2 for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Gerard Dab, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 20th day of July, 2005.



| | /s/ Gerard Dab         
| | -----------------------
| | Gerard Dab             
| | Chief Executive Officer















---
### §45d. Exclusive privileges within park prohibited

No exclusive privilege shall be granted within said park, or on or over the roads and trails therein, except upon ground leased for the erection of buildings or camps thereon.

(July 3, 1926, ch. 744, §4, 44 Stat. 820.)
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München (Germany) By order of that court of 19 January 2006 in Juers Pharma Import-Export GmbH v Oberfinanzdirektion Nürnberg

(Case C-40/06)

(2006/C 86/19)

Language of the case: German

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Finzgericht München (Germany) of 19 January 2006, received at the Court Registry on 25 January 2006, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Jules Pharma Import-Export GmbH and Oberfinanzdirektion Nürnberg on the following question:

Is the Combined Nomenclature (‘the CN’) as amended by Annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1789/2003 (OJ 2003 L 281, p.1) of 11 September 2003 (1) amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical Nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff to be interpreted as meaning that Melatonin capsules, put up as dietary supplements in the absence of authorisation under the provisions on medical products, are to be classified under heading 3004?

----

(1)  OJ L 281, p.1

----
387 P.2d 330

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry HOOVER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 7320.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Nov. 25, 1963.

“Edwin L. Felter, O. Russell Jones, Santa Fe, for appellant. *>*

Earl E. Hartley, Atty. Gen., Joel M. Carson, Shirley C. Zabel, Asst. Attys. Gen., Santa Fe, for appellee.

NOBLE, Justice.

On May 25, 1962, Jerry Hoover was convicted of second degree murder and séntenced to be confined in the State Penitentiary “for a period of not less than twenty-five nor more than fifty years.” This appeal is from the sentence so imposed.

The applicable statute, § 40-24 — 10, N.M. S.A.1953, provided a penalty of imprisonment “for any period of time not less than three [3] years.” This has been construed as providing a' maximum sentence of life imprisonment. State v. Maestas, 63 N.M. 67, 313 P.2d 337. The indeterminate sentence statute, § 41-17-1, N.M.S.A.1953, requires the court to impose a sentence of the minimum and the maximum provided by *224law. State v. Romero, N.Mex., 385 P.2d 967.

It follows that the sentence imposed was erroneous. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to vacate the sentence imposed and to resentence the defendant in conformity with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

COMPTON, C. J., and CARMODY, J., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1246

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1246 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and 68 FR 10359, Mar. 5, 2003.

#### § 1246.2 Allegations admitted; no answer filed; no hearing requested.

If the answer admits the allegations in the notice, or if no answer is filed within the thirty-day period, or if no hearing is requested within such period, the district director or asylum office director shall rescind the adjustment of status previously granted, and no appeal shall lie from his decision.

[62 FR 10385, Mar. 6, 1997, as amended at 64 FR 27881, May 21, 1999]