alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 73/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2014.073.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 73 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5713 March 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2014.073.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 73

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5713 March 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 239/2014 of 12 March 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | | DIRECTIVES |
| | * | Commission Directive 2014/39/EU of 12 March 2014 amending Directive 2012/9/EU as regards the date for its transposition and the deadline for the end of the transitional period (1) | 3 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2014/133/EU |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision of 11 March 2014 rejecting the refusal of authorisations of biocidal products containing bromadiolone notified by Germany in accordance with Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (notified under document C(2014) 1362)

   (1) | 5 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 239/2014 of 12 March 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

DIRECTIVES

*

Commission Directive 2014/39/EU of 12 March 2014 amending Directive 2012/9/EU as regards the date for its transposition and the deadline for the end of the transitional period (1)

3

DECISIONS

2014/133/EU

*

Commission Implementing Decision of 11 March 2014 rejecting the refusal of authorisations of biocidal products containing bromadiolone notified by Germany in accordance with Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
  (notified under document C(2014) 1362)

   (1)

(notified under document C(2014) 1362)

5

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
### §90d. Distributive share of counties of receipts for schools and roads unaffected

The distributive shares of the respective counties of receipts from the national forests from which the national park and recreation areas are created, as paid under the provisions of section 500 of this title, shall not be affected by the elimination of lands from such national forests by the enactment of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 90–544, title V, §501, Oct. 2, 1968, 82 Stat. 929.)
Editorial Note on Part 1208
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1208 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10352, Mar. 5, 2003.

§ 1208.11 Comments from the Department of State. ( a ) The immigration judge may request, in his or her discretion, specific comments from the Department of State regarding individual cases or types of claims under consideration, or other information the immigration judge deems appropriate.
( b ) With respect to any asylum application, the Department of State may provide, at its discretion, to the Immigration Court: ( 1 ) Detailed country conditions information relevant to eligibility for asylum, withholding of removal under section 241(b)(3) of the Act, and withholding of removal under the Convention Against Torture;
( 2 ) An assessment of the accuracy of the applicant's assertions about conditions in the applicant's country of nationality or habitual residence and the applicant's particular situation;
( 3 ) Information about whether persons who are similarly situated to the applicant are persecuted or tortured in the applicant's country of nationality or habitual residence and the frequency of such persecution or torture; or
( 4 ) Such other information as it deems relevant.
( c ) Any comments received pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section shall be made part of the record. Unless the comments are classified under an applicable Executive Order, the applicant shall be provided an opportunity to review and respond to such comments prior to the issuance of any decision to deny the application.
[78 FR 19079, Mar. 29, 2013]
EXHIBIT 99.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the  accompanying  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of North Bay
Bancorp  for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  2002,  I,  Terry L.  Robinson,
President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of North Bay  Bancorp,  hereby  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:


(1) such  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of North Bay  Bancorp  for the  quarter
ended September 30, 2002,  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of North Bay
Bancorp for the quarter  ended  September  30,  2002,  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of North
Bay Bancorp.


Dated:  November 8, 2002


                                           /s/ Terry L. Robinson
                                           -------------------------------------

                                           TERRY L. ROBINSON

                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
Michael L. Dworkin (CA Bar# 64047) MICHAEL L. DWORKIN andASSOCIATES 465 California Street, Suite 210 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415-421-2500 FAX: 415-421-2560 Email: law@avialex.com Counsel for MARTINAIRE AVIATION, LLC 

## MAY 152014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

Inthe Matter of:

MARTINAIRE AVIATION, LLC WASIDNGTON, D.C.
FAA Case No. 2011SW700189 DMS No. FAA-2013-0040 MARTINAIRE AVIATION, LLC'S NOTICE OF MOTIONS Judge: The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin

TO THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, THE HONORABLE RICHARD C. GOODWIN, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE, AND TO THE ADMINISTRATOR, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION AND HIS ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Wednesday, June 18,2014 at 9:00am, in the Bankruptcy Court, 14th Floor, 1100 Commerce Street, Dallas, Texas, Respondent will andhereby does apply to this Court for an Order granting the following Motions; 1. Request for Judicial Notice (Request attached hereto); 2. Motion in Limine to Preclude Complainant's Evidence Relating to Computation and/or Reasonableness ofSanction (Motion attached hereto); 3. Motion in Limine to Preclude Testimony by PersonsNotPreviously Identifiedby Complainant and Complainant's Expert Witness and/or Opinion Testimony (Motion attached hereto); and 4. Motion in Limine to Preclude Testimony that HMR Section 175.33 Has Been Promulgated and Serves to AssistFirst Responders (Motion attached hereto). Respondent respectfully requests that upon hearing said motions, the Court immediately issue an Order granting or denying same as the disposition ofsaid Motions will directly affect the conduct and duration ofthe hearing onthe merits ofthe Complaint and Answer. Complainant is hereby put on notice thatthese Motions will be raised athearing.
Datedthis [(hday ofMay, 2014

### Re~tfully su mityed, 

# //jlfit!U-tPZ 1/

# //_--~ // M1chael 

### L. Dwor in / Attorney for Respondent

2 FAA Case No. 2011SW700189/FAA DocketNo. FAA-2013-0040 MARTINAIRE AVIATION, LLC'S NOTICE OFMOTIONSCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that on this J!}!!'aay ofMay, 2014, a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing MARTINAIRE AVIATION, LLC'SNOTICE OF MOTIONS
was served as follows: The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin Office ofHearings, M-20 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. East Building Ground Floor, Room E12- 320 Washington, D.C. 20590 {Federal Express} Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur WrightBuilding- Suite 2W1000 {Federal Express} James Archier, Esq. Federal Aviation Administration Office ofthe Regional Counsel, ASW-7 2601 Meacham Boulevard, Suite 6E Fort Worth, TX 76137{Federal Express}

CAITLIN M. MILLER

3 FAA Case No. 2011SW700189/FAA DocketNo. FAA-2013-0040 MARTINAIRE AVIATION, LLC'S NOTICE OF MOTIONS
Exhibit (b)(12)


                                    AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                             ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY
                      EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

     WHEREAS,  Illinois  Power  Company (the  "Company")  maintains the Illinois
Power Company Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan"); and

     WHEREAS, amendment of the Plan is now deemed desirable;

     NOW,  THEREFORE,  BE IT RESOLVED that,  pursuant to the amending  authority
reserved to the Corporation in Section 8 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended
in the following particulars:

     1.   By substituting the following for subsection 3.5 of the Plan:

     "3.5 Employee  Selection of Investment Return Rate. Subject to the terms of
the Plan, a Participant may elect the Investment  Return Rate(s) that will apply
to all of his  Accounts  from time to time by filing an election  in  accordance
with such rules as the Plan  Administrator may establish  regarding the form and
timing  of  such  elections,  including  to the  extent  provided  by  the  Plan
Administrator  rules  relating  to daily  Investment  Return  Rate  changes  and
telephonic  filing of elections.  To the extent permitted by the Committee,  the
Participant  may  elect  to have  different  Investment  Return  Rates  apply to
different portions of his Account balances."

     2. By substituting the phrase "Employee Services Department" for the phrase
"Employee  Relations  Department"  where the latter phrase  appears in paragraph
7.2(b) of the Plan.
§ 21.21 Determination of net worth and number of employees. ( a ) The adjudicative officer shall determine an applicant's net worth and number of employees as of the date the adversary adjudication was initiated.
( b ) In determining eligibility, the adjudicative officer shall include the net worth and number of employees of the applicant and all of the affiliates of the applicant.
( c ) For the purposes of paragraph (b) of this section, the adjudicative officer shall consider the following as an affiliate: ( 1 ) Any individual, corporation, or other entity that directly or indirectly owns or controls a majority of the voting shares or other interest of the applicant;
( 2 ) Any corporation or other entity of which the applicant directly or indirectly owns or controls a majority of the voting shares or other interest; and
( 3 ) Any entity with a financial relationship to the applicant that, in the determination of the adjudicative officer, constitutes an affiliation for the purposes of paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) In determining the number of employees of an applicant and its affiliates, the adjudicative officer shall count part-time employees on a proportional basis.
(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 504(c)(1))
130 STAT. 934 PUBLIC LAW 114–227—SEPT. 29, 2016 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5937: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

Sept. 12, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 20, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–227 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to authorize the American Battle Monuments 

Commission to acquire, operate, and maintain the Lafayette Escadrille Memorial 

in Marnes-la-Coquette, France, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY OF THE AMERICAN BATTLE MONUMENTS 

COMMISSION TO ACQUIRE, OPERATE, AND MAINTAIN 

THE LAFAYETTE ESCADRILLE MEMORIAL. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 21 of title 36, United States Code, 

is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 

‘‘§ 2115. Acquisition, operation, and maintenance of Lafayette 

Escadrille Memorial 

‘‘The American Battle Monuments Commission may enter into 

an agreement with the Lafayette Escadrille Memorial Foundation 

to acquire, operate, and maintain the Lafayette Escadrille Memorial 

in Marnes-la-Coquette, France. Under such an agreement, the 

Commission shall make necessary arrangements to ensure the 

ongoing maintenance of the memorial, including the cemetery at 

the memorial that contains the remains of 49 aviators of the United 

States who died during World War I.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 21 of such title is amended by adding at the 

end of the following new item: 

‘‘2115. Acquisition, operation, and maintenance of Lafayette Escadrille Memorial.’’. 

Approved September 29, 2016. 

36 USC 

prec. 2101. 

36 USC 2115. 

Sept. 29, 2016 

[H.R. 5937] 


ralbany on LAP520R082 with PUBLIC LAW
#### § 222.109 When may a local educational agency reply to a complaint?

An LEA's reply to the charges in the complaint must be filed with the hearing examiner within 15 days of the date the LEA receives a copy of the notice and complaint described in § 222.108 (d) and (e) from the hearing examiner.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7704(e))
§ 813.8 Significant guidance documents. ( a ) Though not legally binding, some agency guidance may result in a substantial economic impact. For example, the issuance of agency guidance may induce private parties to alter their conduct or conform to recommended standards of practices, thereby incurring costs beyond the costs of complying with existing statutes and regulations.
( b ) If there is a reasonable possibility the guidance may be considered “significant” within the meaning of § 813.7 or if the Agencies are uncertain whether the guidance may qualify as such, the Agencies must receive OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) approval before issuance, unless the Agencies and OIRA agree that exigency, safety, health, or other compelling cause warrants an exemption from some or all requirements.
( c ) When an agency is assessing or explaining whether it believes a guidance document is significant, it should, at a minimum, provide the same level of analysis that would be required for a major determination under the Congressional Review Act.[1]
( d ) The following will apply to significant guidance documents: ( 1 ) A period of public notice and comment of at least 30 days before the issuance of a final guidance document, and a public response from the Agencies to major concerns raised in comments. If the Agencies, for good cause, find that the notice and public comment are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, then no period of public comment will be provided, with notification and consultation with OIRA;
( 2 ) Approval by the respective Agency Director;
( 3 ) Review by OIRA under Executive Order 12866 before issuance;
( 4 ) Compliance with the applicable requirements for regulations or rules, including significant regulatory actions, set forth in E.O. 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), E.O. 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), E.O. 13609 (Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation), E.O. 13771 (Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs), and E.O. 13777 (Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda).
Footnotes -
813.8
[1] See OMB Memorandum M-19-14, Guidance on Compliance with the Congressional Review Act (April 11, 2019).
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

In Re: )

Cara Peyton Innovations, LLC )

 ) Case #15-14429-BFK 

 Debtor. ) Chap. 11

 )

 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BALANCE OF SCHEDULES AND

STATEMENTS

 NOW COMES, the Debtor, who shows the Court as follows:

 1. On December 17, 2015, Debtor filed a petition for relief

under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.

 2. With the petition, Debtor filed a list of creditors and

their addresses.

 3. In view of Debtor’s designated representative’s busy

schedule, debtor needs at least twelve (12) additional days to

complete the Schedules, and any other required documentation.

 Therefore, Debtor respectfully requests that the Court grant

him until January 16, 2016 to file the Schedules and any other

required documentation.

Date: 1/4/16 Cara Peyton Innovations, LLC, Debtor

By Counsel

/s/John D. Sawyer

John D. Sawyer, Esq.- VSB #28170

Sawyer & Azarcon

10605 Judicial Drive, Suite B-2

Fairfax, VA 22030

(703) 893-0760

Counsel for Debtor(s)

Case 15-14429-BFK Doc 10 Filed 01/04/16 Entered 01/04/16 16:17:10 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Debtor(s)’s

Motion to Extend Time to File Balance and Plan as to all creditors

was this 4th day of January, 2016, forwarded via United States

mail, postage prepaid, or via the Court’s electronic notification

system to all creditors included on mailing matrix.

/s/John D. Sawyer

John D. Sawyer, Esq

[CPI.Bk.EXT.MTN]

PARTIES TO RECEIVE COPIES:

}bk1{CreditorAdresMatrix}bk{

Cara Peyton Innovations LLC 

11394 Amber Hills Court 

Fairfax, VA 22033

Allen O. Cage, Jr. 

Acct No xxxxxx8583 

14151 Newbrook Dr, Suite 200 

Chantilly, VA 20151

Charles Johnson, Jr. 

Acct No xxxxxx8583 

11394 Amber Hills Court 

Fairfax, VA 22033

Charles Johnson, Jr. 

11394 Amber Hills Court 

Fairfax, VA 22033

Debra Johnson 

Acct No xxxxxx8583 

11394 Amber Hills Court 

Fairfax, VA 22033

Fairfax County 

Dept. Tax Administration 

PO Box 10200 

Fairfax, VA 22035

Industrial Bank 

4907 Georgia Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20011

Wells Fargo 

Acct No xxxxxx8583 

855 IBM Drive 

Charlotte, NC 28262

Case 15-14429-BFK Doc 10 Filed 01/04/16 Entered 01/04/16 16:17:10 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                     THE HERTZ CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                 COMPUTATION OF CONSOLIDATED RATIO OF EARNINGS
                          TO FIXED CHARGES (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Years Ended December 31,
                                           ----------------------------------------------------------
                                              1999         1998        1997        1996        1995
                                           ----------    --------    --------    --------    --------
                                                    (In Thousands of Dollars Except Ratios)
<S>                                        <C>           <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Income before income taxes...............  $  560,393    $465,392    $343,270    $256,569    $172,344
Interest expense.........................     353,516     317,756     316,038     309,249     323,871
Portion of rent estimated to represent
  the interest factor....................      90,463      78,435      72,752      69,188      75,874
                                           ----------    --------    --------    --------    --------
Earnings before income taxes and fixed
  charges................................  $1,004,372    $861,583    $732,060    $635,006    $572,089
                                           ==========    ========    ========    ========    ========
Interest expense (including capitalized
  interest)..............................  $  355,309    $318,967    $316,536    $309,843    $325,021
Portion of rent estimated to represent
  the interest factor....................      90,463      78,435      72,752      69,188      75,874
                                           ----------    --------    --------    --------    --------
Fixed charges............................  $  445,772    $397,402    $389,288    $379,031    $400,895
                                           ==========    ========    ========    ========    ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.......         2.3         2.2         1.9         1.7         1.4
                                           ==========    ========    ========    ========    ========
</TABLE>
### §820. Proceedings for revocation of license or to prevent violations of license

The Attorney General may, on request of the commission or of the Secretary of the Army, institute proceedings in equity in the district court of the United States in the district in which any project or part thereof is situated for the purpose of revoking for violation of its terms any permit or license issued hereunder, or for the purpose of remedying or correcting by injunction, mandamus, or other process any act of commission or omission in violation of the provisions of this chapter or of any lawful regulation or order promulgated hereunder. The district courts shall have jurisdiction over all of the above-mentioned proceedings and shall have power to issue and execute all necessary process and to make and enforce all writs, orders and decrees to compel compliance with the lawful orders and regulations of the commission and of the Secretary of the Army, and to compel the performance of any condition imposed under the provisions of this chapter. In the event a decree revoking a license is entered, the court is empowered to sell the whole or any part of the project or projects under license, to wind up the business of such licensee conducted in connection with such project or projects, to distribute the proceeds to the parties entitled to the same, and to make and enforce such further orders and decrees as equity and justice may require. At such sale or sales the vendee shall take the rights and privileges belonging to the licensee and shall perform the duties of such licensee and assume all outstanding obligations and liabilities of the licensee which the court may deem equitable in the premises; and at such sale or sales the United States may become a purchaser, but it shall not be required to pay a greater amount than it would be required to pay under the provisions of section 807 of this title at the termination of the license.

(June 10, 1920, ch. 285, pt. I, §26, 41 Stat. 1076; renumbered pt. I, Aug. 26, 1935, ch. 687, title II, §212, 49 Stat. 847; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Proceedings in equity, referred to in text, were abolished by the adoption of Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, set out in the Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, which provided that "there shall be one form of action to be known as 'civil action' ".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued military Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.