alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
March 10, 2015 

Mr. Kyle Cummings 

1605 North Willow Road, 216 

Urbana, IL 61801 

Dear Mr. Cummings: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Cannot Process Your Request 

We entered your February 20, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA2015-0416), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent 

does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the 

request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Nia Daniels 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of BlastGard International, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the company on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended March 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the companys
financial condition and results of operations.



May 14, 2004



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael J. Gordon                     
|Michael J. Gordon, Chief Financial Officer
!"#$
%&" "'()*+,),-*


./ "0/(+





!


!1	!



	
	
	


		

		
	
		
		
 !	
	
	"

	#
$			%!&!&'()

* 	

	+,-$

.	/00121"

	
	3
		

4	
	 

5 

		
	4			6		 

7 (		
"! 	
8		
4	

%		
&


		
			
		
	

	
	5/19#
."(:";57<=0	.	>

	
"

	

	3			#



4	 

1 		
	


	+)

 	


	
?/@"1=@ 00"	




				


?/="955 @9A

- 		
	
	

			
	7 =@0B

		
	
	

					


1 *5@BA

(	
	% .		;(-C==57/

-	,+%
"> # 

> D -**@99

.";575702*@99

		
	9017@92<<00

#	
	


Case 16-35652-KRH Doc 49 Filed 03/01/18 Entered 03/01/18 12:14:30 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 5
# 		
		
	7/0"		


				
190A

 	
	
			
	"

+
	
		





	
	"?707 57A

 	
	
					


"+
	
		





	
	"?599 =@A

% 				
	
		



	A

	

	
	
8	"
		+	
		4	


$
		

	
A

' 	+
	+	

	 :+	4	
"

	
	
	
		
$



	

				
		 

@ 		

	.	>

	
+)

Case 16-35652-KRH Doc 49 Filed 03/01/18 Entered 03/01/18 12:14:30 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 5
!

	
	#
	6			
		

	+

	
E"	
	"

D..	
E	
	'.&"
	


D..	
		
		+(		
"! 	


8		
4	

%		
&
				

	
			

			
"
	


D..

	

	
	2
8	"
		
		4	
$


		

	
A
	


D..	#	
$
	D
	
"			
	"



				
4	 

	)FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF           

G ( -$

H	

	
	$	)FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

I(!'&G.(D%#DG&(,>>.D&%D,,DJ!&'>'K

Feb 28 2018 /s/ Kevin R Huennekens

March 1 2018

Case 16-35652-KRH Doc 49 Filed 03/01/18 Entered 03/01/18 12:14:30 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 5
!$
)

LL(	
	% .		

(	
	% .		;(-C==57/

-	,+%
"> # 

> D -**@99

.";
575702*@99

		
	9017@92<<00

#	
	


(		)

  LLF  (	
	% .			#
 -	+L
	
4	

#
 -	"3
	

#
	
*7
		





>
,.	<0552*#"!	
		
		


	4	

	
		4	
	
 

LL(	
	% .		

#	
	


Case 16-35652-KRH Doc 49 Filed 03/01/18 Entered 03/01/18 12:14:30 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 5
"//
0

-	,+%
"> # 

> D -**@99

.";
575702*@99

#
 -	"3
	

#
	
*7
		

> D -*9*<

.";575*9


		


> D -*@75*

.";5755=

(		
"! 	
8		
4	

%		
&
	

> D -*01=

:

"#0/*17

Case 16-35652-KRH Doc 49 Filed 03/01/18 Entered 03/01/18 12:14:30 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 5
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Gino M. Pereira., Chief Financial Officer of Markland Technologies, Inc.,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Markland
Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 2005                    /S/ GINO M. PEREIRA
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           GINO M PEREIRA
                                           CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
§ 1340.12 Re-selection of observation sites. ( a ) *Re-selection of observation sites.* States shall re-select observation sites using updated sampling frame data, as described in § 1340.5(a), no less than once every five years.
( b ) *Re-selection submission deadline.* States shall submit updated sampling frame data meeting the requirements of § 1340.5(a) for NHTSA approval no later than March 1 of the re-selection year.
### §718k. Use of fees collected for Federal migratory bird permits

On and after October 21, 1998, all fees collected for Federal migratory bird permits shall be available to the Secretary, without further appropriation, to be used for the expenses of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in administering such Federal migratory bird permits, and shall remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(e) [title I], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–231, 2681–236.)
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                             DAC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of DAC
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), David A. Collins Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ David A. Collins
-----------------------------------------
David A. Collins, Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 12, 2003
• 

• 

• 

CITY OF INTERNATIONAL FALLS 

April26, 2012 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis- U.S. DOT 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr DeVany: 

600 FOURTH STREET 

INTERNATIONAL FALLS, MN 56649 

Telephone 218/283~9484 

FAX 218/283w3590 

OFFICEOFMAYOR c 

Shawn Mason 

~s,-;~()~9- ~3ot/ 

•.;,) 

Thank you again for taking the time to meet with our delegation when we were in Washingtcm last month. As we 

discussed, without commercial air setvice, our community and our region would suffer significant economic 

decline. Our summer tourism industry is the main support of our many small resorts and other businesses that 

work with them. They depend on the airport to bring in their customers. Our Cold Weather Test industry relies on 

conunercial air service to move goods and people in and out of the airportwbased test center. We benefit from the 

trade of our Canadian neighbors who cross the border to do business and who provide nearly half of our annual 

enplanements. Because of the extreme distances to other commercial airports, it is not practical or realistic to 

assume our local business climate could continue as is, let alone improve, if our own commercial service is 

discontinued. 

We are pleased that the order which selects Great Lakes Airlines as our EAS carrier has now been signed. We 

pledge to work closely with you, Delta, and Great Lakes to assure a smooth transition. It is in all of our interests 

that Great Lakes successfully operate commercial service to our airport. However, until we have experience with 

Great Lakes Airlines, we will continue to have concerns, particularly regarding schedule and summer capacity. 

We are asking for your assistance to assure that Great Lakes Airlines keeps the commitments they have made to 

us. We have good support for our airport among our congressional delegation which includes representatives of 

both parties and we believe that our particularized experience will help infonn the national debate on the EAS 

program going forward especially if we can hold our community up as an example of how EAS is supposed to 

work. T hnks again for your work to help keep our airport operating successfully. 

cc. 

···? 

I v /$ ~/~ 

Senator Amy Klobuchar 

Senator AI Franken 

Representative Chip Cravaack 

Governor Mark Dayton 

Doug Voss, Great Lakes Airlines
§ 630.1008 State-level processes and procedures. ( a ) This section consists of State-level processes and procedures for States to implement and sustain their respective work zone safety and mobility policies. State-level processes and procedures, data and information resources, training, and periodic evaluation enable a systematic approach for addressing and managing the safety and mobility impacts of work zones.
( b ) *Work zone assessment and management procedures.* States should develop and implement systematic procedures to assess work zone impacts in project development, and to manage safety and mobility during project implementation. The scope of these procedures shall be based on the project characteristics.
( c ) *Work zone data.* States shall use field observations, available work zone crash data, and operational information to manage work zone impacts for specific projects during implementation. States shall continually pursue improvement of work zone safety and mobility by analyzing work zone crash and operational data from multiple projects to improve State processes and procedures. States should maintain elements of the data and information resources that are necessary to support these activities.
( d ) *Training.* States shall require that personnel involved in the development, design, implementation, operation, inspection, and enforcement of work zone related transportation management and traffic control be trained, appropriate to the job decisions each individual is required to make. States shall require periodic training updates that reflect changing industry practices and State processes and procedures.
( e ) *Process review.* In order to assess the effectiveness of work zone safety and mobility procedures, the States shall perform a process review at least every two years. This review may include the evaluation of work zone data at the State level, and/or review of randomly selected projects throughout their jurisdictions. Appropriate personnel who represent the project development stages and the different offices within the State, and the FHWA should participate in this review. Other non-State stakeholders may also be included in this review, as appropriate. The results of the review are intended to lead to improvements in work zone processes and procedures, data and information resources, and training programs so as to enhance efforts to address safety and mobility on current and future projects.
Exhibit
7.1

---



Ratio of earnings to fixed charges  continuing operations

For the purpose of computing this ratio, earnings consist of Group income from continuing operations before taxation of Group and income received from companies owned 50% or less, plus
fixed charges excluding capitalised interest. Fixed charges consist of interest (including capitalised interest) on all indebtedness, amortisation of debt discount and expense and that portion of rental expense representative of the interest factor.


|                                                      | Year
    ended December 31, | 
|----------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------- | 
|                                                      | 2005                        | 
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                    |                             | 
|For the Group (under IFRS)                            | 4.8                         | 
|                                                      |                             | 
|For the Group with adjustments to accord with US GAAP | 3.4                         | 
|                                                      |                             | 

The deficiency of earnings to fixed charges under US GAAP for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 was £73m and £47m respectively.


---
§ 771.127 Record of decision. ( a ) When the final EIS is not combined with the ROD, the Administration will complete and sign a ROD no sooner than 30 days after publication of the final EIS notice in the Federal Register or 90 days after publication of a notice for the draft EIS, whichever is later. The ROD will present the basis for the decision as specified in 40 CFR 1505.2, summarize any mitigation measures that will be incorporated in the project, and document any required Section 4(f) approval in accordance with part 774 of this chapter. To minimize hardcopy requests and printing costs, the Administration encourages the use of project websites or other publicly accessible electronic means to make the ROD available.
( b ) If the Administration subsequently wishes to approve an alternative that was not identified as the preferred alternative but was fully evaluated in the draft EIS, combined FEIS/ROD, or final EIS, or proposes to make substantial changes to the mitigation measures or findings discussed in the ROD, a revised or amended ROD must be subject to review by those Administration offices that reviewed the final EIS under § 771.124(a) or § 771.125(c). To the extent practicable, the approved revised or amended ROD must be provided to all persons, organizations, and agencies that received a copy of the final EIS.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         129,673
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,660
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               191,333
<PP&E>                                          90,321
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,772
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 450,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,497,061
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,413
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,203,955)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   450,519
<SALES>                                        148,650
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               148,650
<CGS>                                          116,510
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  116,510
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               347,745
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,561
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (312,857)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (312,857)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (312,857)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Herley Industries,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A  Amendment 1 for the fiscal  year ended July 31,  2005,  as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Myron Levy,  Vice  Chairman of the Board and Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  Such Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in such Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                Date:     November 28, 2005

                                By:       /s/ Myron Levy
                                Name:     Myron Levy
                                Title:    Vice Chairman of the Board and
                                          Chief Executive Officer


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Herley Industries,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A  Amendment 1 for the fiscal  year ended July 31,  2005,  as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Anello C. Garefino,  Acting Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  hereby
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  Such Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in such Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                Date:     November 28, 2005

                                By:       /s/ Anello C. Garefino
                                Name:     Anello C. Garefino
                                Title:    Acting Chief Executive Officer
### §5931. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 105–391, title II, §201, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3499, related to purposes of this subchapter.
§ 104.23 New construction. ( a ) *Design and construction.* Each facility or part of a facility constructed by, on behalf of, or for the use of a recipient shall be designed and constructed in such manner that the facility or part of the facility is readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons, if the construction was commenced after the effective date of this part.
( b ) *Alteration.* Each facility or part of a facility which is altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of a recipient after the effective date of this part in a manner that affects or could affect the usability of the facility or part of the facility shall, to the maximum extent feasible, be altered in such manner that the altered portion of the facility is readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons.
( c ) *Conformance with Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards.* ( 1 ) Effective as of January 18, 1991, design, construction, or alteration of buildings in conformance with sections 3-8 of the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS) (Appendix A to 41 CFR subpart 101-19.6) shall be deemed to comply with the requirements of this section with respect to those buildings. Departures from particular technical and scoping requirements of UFAS by the use of other methods are permitted where substantially equivalent or greater access to and usability of the building is provided.
( 2 ) For purposes of this section, section 4.1.6(1)(g) of UFAS shall be interpreted to exempt from the requirements of UFAS only mechanical rooms and other spaces that, because of their intended use, will not require accessibility to the public or beneficiaries or result in the employment or residence therein of persons with phusical handicaps.
( 3 ) This section does not require recipients to make building alterations that have little likelihood of being accomplished without removing or altering a load-bearing structural member.
[45 FR 30936, May 9, 1980; 45 FR 37426, June 3, 1980, as amended at 55 FR 52138, 52141, Dec. 19, 1990]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1245

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1245 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and 68 FR 10357, Mar. 5, 2003.

#### § 1245.6 Interview.

Each applicant for adjustment of status under this part shall be interviewed by an immigration officer. This interview may be waived in the case of a child under the age of 14; when the applicant is clearly ineligible under section 245(c) of the Act or § 1245.1 of this chapter; or when it is determined by the Service that an interview is unnecessary.

[57 FR 49375, Nov. 2, 1992]