I am writing to request an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent required for

Hannah Kang to be able to use an FAA Approved Child Restraint Sy stem even though she exceeds the weight limits for the CRS. In addition, if my petition is granted, Irequest that an y air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Hannah Kang is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)( B) to the extent necessary to allow Hannah Kang to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA

- approved child restraint sy stem during use of that child restraint sy stem aboard an aircraft. I believe the pertinent section from 14 CFR part 121 from which we seek relief is Section 121.311 Seats, safet y belts, and shoulder harnesses.
My daughter is 8 y ear’s old, weighs 60 pounds, and is 53” inches tall. My daughter ’s ph ys ical condition is as follows: Lennox Gastaut Sy ndrome which causes her to have uncontrolle d seizures . As a result of her phy sical condition, she needs the support and security provided by

an FAA Approved Child Restraint, but because of her weight is incapable of compliance with the regulation. **I am also submitting the following contact informa tion:**  **Euna Kim / 1813 Koehling Rd., Northbrook, IL 60062 / eunakim0510@hotmail.com.**  I understand that the regulation is written to create a high level of safety for each individual passenger b y ensuring that they are securel y restrained in their seats duri ng all phases of flight. The regulation also ensures that an individual does not cause harm to other passengers on the airplane b y being thrown into them during turbulent or emergency conditions. I propose that Hannah Kang be allowed to occupy an FAA Appro ved Child Restraint (CARES, manufactured b y AmSafe, Inc.), even though she exceeds the manufacturer’s weight limits. This ensures a high level of safety for Hannah Kang and a high level of safet y for the other passengers and crew on the airplane. In fact, in Hannah Kang’s case, safet y is greatly enhanced b y the extra support and securit y that the FAA Approved Restraint Sy stem will provide during the entire flight. Enhancing safety

for Hannah Kang is in the public interest. In addition, the public interest i s also served b y the fact that the use of this FAA Approved Child Restraint Sy stem allows her to use commercial air transportation. Without the support and security of the FAA Approved Child Restraint Sy stem, she would be unable to fl y commerciall y.

I also believe that, with certain limitations established by the FAA in a grant to this petition, there can be an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the affected regulation. The CARES restraint has been certified by the manufacturer for use by childr en 22

- 44 pounds. However, the components of the CARES restraint are the same as those used in restraints for adults on aircraft and would maintain their integrit y if used b y someone who weighed several hundred pounds. I believe that the limit of 44 pounds was established because, with the additional weight of the child attached to the seatback, the seatback would move forward more quickly in an accident scenario and this might cause a higher HIC load for the person seated in the seat behind the passenger u sing the CARES restraint (because the seatback moving forward more quickly wouldmean that it would not be there to attenuate the energy from the impact of the person seated behind the person using the CARES restraint). In order to achieve an equivalent le vel of safet y as that provided by the affected regulation, I propose that the FAA establish a limitation in a grant to this petition that Hannah Kang onl y sits in a passenger seat with no passenger seated behind her. Therefore, no unsafe condition would
ex ist for a passenger seated behind Hannah Kang while she is using the CARES restraint. I also propose that all operations under this exemption be conducted with at least one of Hannah Kang’s parents or a caregiver accompanying him or her. In addition, Ipropose that Hannah Kang’s parent or caregiver must carry a cop y of this exemption.

I also request that the processing of this petition not be delay ed for publication and comment in the Federa l Register. We want to travel June 11 th

– 15 th , 2013. If you take the time to put this in the Federal Register, it will delay the process and we may

not be able to travel in this timeframe. If it is necessary

to put a summary

in the Federal Register, I sub mit the following: This is a request for an exemption from FAR 121.311 (b) to the extent required for a child to use an FAA Approved Child Restraint Sy stem on an aircraft, even though the child exceeds the weight limits for the CRS. Due to phy sical challen ges, without the support and securit y of this FAA Approved Child Restraint Sy stem, this child would be unable to fl y. We request that this child be allowed to occupy an FAA Approved Child Restraint (CARES, manufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), even though she exc eeds the manufacturer’s weight limits of 44 pounds. In this case, the safet y of this child is greatl y enhanced by the extra support and security that the FAA Approved Restraint S ys tem will provide for her during the flight.