alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §832g. Purchase of supplies and services

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, all purchases and contracts made by the administrator or the Secretary of the Army for supplies or for services except for personal services, shall be made after advertising, in such manner and at such times, sufficiently in advance of opening bids, as the administrator or Secretary of the Army, as the case may be, shall determine to be adequate to insure notice and opportunity for competition. Such advertisement shall not be required, however, when (1) an emergency requires immediate delivery of the supplies or performance of the services; or (2) repair parts, accessories, supplemental equipment, or services are required for supplies or services previously furnished or contracted for; or (3) the aggregate amount involved in any purchase of supplies or procurement of services does not exceed $500; in which cases such purchases of supplies or procurement of services may be made in the open market in the manner common among businessmen. In comparing bids and in making awards, the administrator or the Secretary of the Army, as the case may be, may consider such factors as relative quality and adaptability of supplies or services, the bidder's financial responsibility, skill, experience, record of integrity in dealing, and ability to furnish repairs and maintenance services, the time of delivery or performance offered, and whether the bidder has complied with the specifications.

(Aug. 20, 1937, ch. 720, §8, 50 Stat. 735; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued military Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Secretary of the Interior with respect to Bonneville Power Administration transferred to Secretary of Energy by section 7152(a)(1)(D), (2) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, with Bonneville Power Administration to be preserved as a distinct organizational entity within Department of Energy and headed by an Administrator.
### §430g–2. Exchange of lands

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to have competent and disinterested appraisals made as to the value of not more than twenty-three acres of land in Gettysburg National Military Park, in the State of Pennsylvania, such land lying generally between East Confederate Avenue and Wainwright Avenue, and being situated adjacent to the present high-school property in that area. Upon the basis of such appraisals, the Secretary is authorized to convey such property for public-school purposes to the State of Pennsylvania, or the appropriate local agency thereof, the conveyance to be made in exchange for non-Federal land of approximately equal value, which land, upon acceptance by the United States, shall become a part of Gettysburg National Military Park.

(July 31, 1953, ch. 290, 67 Stat. 243.)
Editorial Note on Part 1240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1240 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10355, Mar. 3, 2003.

§ 1240.35 Decision of the immigration judge; notice to the applicant. ( a ) *Decision.* The immigration judge shall inform the applicant of his or her decision in accordance with § 1003.37 of this chapter.
( b ) *Advice to alien ordered excluded.* An alien ordered excluded shall be furnished with Form I-296, Notice to Alien Ordered Excluded by Immigration Judge, at the time of an oral decision by the immigration judge or upon service of a written decision.
( c ) *Holders of refugee travel documents.* Aliens who are the holders of valid unexpired refugee travel documents may be ordered excluded only if they are found to be inadmissible under section 212(a)(2), 212(a)(3), or 212(a)(6)(E) of the Act, and it is determined that on the basis of the acts for which they are inadmissible there are compelling reasons of national security or public order for their exclusion. If the immigration judge finds that the alien is inadmissible but determines that there are no compelling reasons of national security or public order for exclusion, the immigration judge shall remand the case to the district director for parole.
#### § 101.78 Evidence.

Irrelevant, immaterial, unreliable, and unduly repetitious evidence will be excluded.
# Official Journal C 299/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.299.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 299 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 535 November 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2010.299.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 299

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 535 November 2010

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| | Council |
| 2010/C 299/01 | Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the framework for the deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems in the field of road transport and for interfaces with other transport modes (first reading) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

Council

2010/C 299/01

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the framework for the deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems in the field of road transport and for interfaces with other transport modes (first reading)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 299/02 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2010/C 299/02

Euro exchange rates

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 299/03 | Notice of initiation of a partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of coumarin originating in the People's Republic of China | 4 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | Council |
| 2010/C 299/04 | Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Common Position 2006/795/CFSP (Annex II) and Council Regulation (EC) No 329/2007 (Annex V) apply | 6 |
| | European Commission |
| 2010/C 299/05 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 7 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON COMMERCIAL POLICY

European Commission

2010/C 299/03

Notice of initiation of a partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of coumarin originating in the People's Republic of China

4

OTHER ACTS

Council

2010/C 299/04

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Common Position 2006/795/CFSP (Annex II) and Council Regulation (EC) No 329/2007 (Annex V) apply

6

European Commission

2010/C 299/05

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs

7

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2004314EN.01002102.xml

| 18.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/21

---

Action brought on 22 September 2004 by Erich Drazdansky against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case T-383/04)

(2004/C 314/53)

Language of the case: German

An action against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 22 September 2004 by Erich Drazdansky, resident in Wiener Neustadt (Austria), represented by M. Kadlicz, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | alter the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation of 23 July 2004 — R 1014/2001-2 so as to allow the appeal and refuse or reject the opposition; |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation of 23 July 2004 — R 1014/2001-2 so as to allow the appeal and refuse or reject the opposition;

| — | in the alternative, annul the decision of OHIM and require it to reach a fresh decision on the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul the decision of OHIM and require it to reach a fresh decision on the appeal;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments:

| Applicant for Community trade mark: | The applicant |
| --- | --- |
| Community trade mark sought: | Word mark ‘Vitacan’ for goods in Class 29 (milk drinks etc.), Class 30 (cocoa or chocolate drinks) and Class 32 (fruit drinks etc.), application No 452 284 |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Refusal to register the mark applied for |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Dismissal of the appeal |
| Pleas in law: | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 (1) |

Applicant for Community trade mark:

The applicant

Community trade mark sought:

Word mark ‘Vitacan’ for goods in Class 29 (milk drinks etc.), Class 30 (cocoa or chocolate drinks) and Class 32 (fruit drinks etc.), application No 452 284

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Refusal to register the mark applied for

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law:

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 (1)

---

(1)  Council Regulation No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

---
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

RULE 13A-14(A) OR RULE 15D-14(A)

I, Steven M. Healy, CPA certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Imperial Industries, Inc. (the Company);

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2007

| |                             
| | ----------------------------
| | /s/ STEVENM. HEALY, CPA     
| | Steven M. Healy, CPA        
| | Chief Financial Officer/    
| | Principal Accounting Officer
431 P.2d 70

#### The NEW MEXICO ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATION, a Voluntary Association, and U. G. Montgomery, the Executive Secretary Thereof, Petitioner, v. Honorable Joe ANGEL, District Judge of the Fourth Judicial District in and for the County of San Miguel, New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 8515.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Aug. 31, 1967.

CHAVEZ, Chief Justice, and NOBLE, MOISE, COMPTON and CARMODY, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that the petition for writ of prohibition be and the same is hereby denied.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
The Stockholders and Board of Directors
of THE GILLETTE COMPANY:
 
     We consent to incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements of The Gillette Company (1) No. 33-9495 on Form S-8, (2) No. 2-93230
on Form S-8, (3) Nos. 33-56218 and 33-27916 on Form S-8 which incorporate by
reference therein registration statements on Form S-8 Nos. 2-90276, 2-63951 and
1-50710 and No. 2-41016 on Form S-7, (4) No. 33-54974 on Form S-3, (5) No.
33-50303 on Form S-3, (6) No. 33- 52465 on Form S-8, (7) No. 33-53257 on Form
S-8, (8) No. 33-53258 on Form S-8, (9) No. 33-55051 on Form S-3, (10) No.
33-59125 on Form S-8, (11) No. 33-63707 on Form S-8 (12) No. 333-16735 on Form
S-4 and (13) No. 333-19133 on Form S-8 of our reports dated January 30, 1997,
relating to the consolidated balance sheet of The Gillette Company and
subsidiary companies as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, consolidated statements
of income and earnings reinvested in the business, and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, and the related
financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the December 31, 1996
Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Gillette Company.
 
                                            KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
 
Boston, Massachusetts
March 20, 1997
 
                                       17
### Geology and hydrology of the site of the Hallam Nuclear Power Facility, Nebraska

By: Charles Franklin Keech

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1133B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 10-b-1


                              NORDSON CORPORATION

                       RESOLUTION AMENDING 1979 EMPLOYEES
                    STOCK OPTION PLAN TO PROVIDE FOR OPTIONS
                          EXERCISABLE IN INSTALLMENTS

                                 April 20, 1982



                  RESOLVED, that Section 7(a) of the Company's 1979 Employees
Stock Option Plan (the "Option Plan") be, and hereby is, amended to read
as follows:

                  (a) Each option shall become exercisable at such
            time or times, wholly or in such installments, as
            the Committee may determine at the time of grant. Any option
            that, at the time of grant, is exercisable in installments
            may be subsequently accelerated to the extent determined by
            the Committee, provided that no part of an option, as
            accelerated, shall become exercisable before the first
            installment of the option, prior to acceleration, would have
            become exercisable.
(No. 76-CC-0280

#### Gilbert Gall, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed October 21, 1977.*

*137Holderman, J.

This matter comes before the Court on Respondent’s motion to dismiss the complaint heretofore filed by the Claimant.

Complaint was filed on August 28,1975, for injuries which occurred on August 27, 1973.

On January 3, 1974, Claimant filed suit in the LaSalle County Circuit Court against Garry L. Johnson, which case was At Law No. 74-1-8 L, seeking damages from the defendant, a State Trooper, for injuries received as a consequence of the occurrence of August 27, 1973.

The motion for dismissal, in Count I, moves for dismissal on the grounds that the statute of limitations had not been complied with since the claim was filed more than two years after the date of the accident. In Count II, the motion sets forth as grounds for dismissal the fact that in LaSalle County Circuit Court judgment was entered on June 18,1975, in favor of the defendant. In this Count, Respondent states that this case is res judicata and, therefore, the claim filed in this Court is barred by prior adjudication.

In Count III of Respondent’s motion to dismiss, it further states that Claimant has made an election of remedies by proceeding to a verdict and judgment in the LaSalle County Circuit Court and accordingly he is barred from prosecuting this claim in the Court of Claims.

*138It appearing to this Court that all of Respondent’s objections are valid, any one being sufficient to sustain the motion to dismiss, said motion to dismiss is hereby granted and said cause is dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Quotemedia, Inc. (the Company)
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith J. Randall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and
belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                     
|----------------------- |  | --------------------
|                        | 
|By:                     |  | /s/ Keith J. Randall
|Keith J. Randall       
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 10, 2006
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 78230 / July 5, 2016

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-14641

____________________________________

:

In the Matter of :

:

CHARLES L. RIZZO and : ORDER DIRECTING 

GINA M. HORNBOGEN, : DISBURSEMENT OF

: FAIR FUND

Respondents. :

____________________________________:

On July 24, 2014, the Commission issued an Order Approving Amended Plan of 

Distribution (Exchange Act Rel. No. 72667 (July 24, 2014)). The Amended Plan provides for 

the distribution of the Fair Fund when the Fund Administrator submits a payment file with payee 

information in a Commission-approved format. On March 23, 2015, the Commission ordered 

staff to direct the payment of $189,042.04 from the Fair Fund in accordance with the Amended 

Plan. The Commission further authorized its Secretary to issue an order directing disbursement 

of the Fair Fund, upon receipt of the payment file from the Fund Administrator,

1

as anticipated 

in the Amended Plan, if additional funds were received.2 Those funds have been received and 

 

1

See Order Directing Disbursement of Fair Fund, Exchange Act Rel. No. 74566 (March 23, 2015).

2

The Amended Plan detailed the anticipation of additional funds received and the need for two (2) disbursements to 

the eligible Fair Fund recipients, because a portion of the monies to be paid into the Fair Fund was ordered to be paid 

through payment installments that were scheduled to end in July 2015.
2

added to the Fair Fund, in accordance with the Amended Plan. The Fund Administrator has 

submitted a payment file with payee information for the disbursement of $12,692.56.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Commission staff shall direct the payment of 

$12,692.56 from the Fair Fund as provided for in the Amended Plan.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Brent J. Fields

Secretary