alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PANNELL KERR
FORSTER AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          61,324
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  311,458
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               389,960
<PP&E>                                         142,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                (69,043)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 832,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          316,176
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,445,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,084
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   832,413
<SALES>                                        320,625
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               320,625
<CGS>                                           65,634
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,634
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               377,615
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (122,624)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (122,624)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (122,624)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
### §667a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 8, 1940, ch. 295, §§1–4, 54 Stat. 261, authorized compacts or agreements between or among the States bordering on the Atlantic Ocean with respect to fishing in the territorial waters and bays and inlets of the Atlantic Ocean on which such States border.

Act May 4, 1942, ch. 283, §§1–4, 56 Stat. 267, granted the consent and approval of Congress to an interstate compact relating to the better utilization of the fisheries (marine, shell, and anadromous) of the Atlantic seaboard and creating the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission.

Act Aug. 19, 1950, ch. 763, §§1–4, 64 Stat. 467, granted the consent and approval of Congress to an amendment to the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Compact and repealed limitation on the life of such compact.
EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 No. 33-64903 and Forms S-8 No. 2-69298, 33-59015, and 33-51098) 
and related prospectuses of our report dated January 23, 1996, except
for Note 4, as to which the date is March 7, 1996, with respect to the 
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Houghton Mifflin Company
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December  31, 1995.

                                                           /S/ERNST&YOUNG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 25,1996
Jarbidge Draft RMP/EIS Maps 

M-115 

Map 114. WSAs 

August 2010 

S n a k e R i v e r

S n a k e R i v e r

C l o v e r C r e e k

S a l m o

n

F a l l s

C r e

e k

J a r b i d g e

R i v

e r

51

Jackpot

93

ELKO

COUNTY

IDAHO IDAHO

NEVADA NEVADA

C e d a r C r e e

B

k

r u

n

e

a

u

R i v e r

EF Jarbidge

84

30

78

Buhl

Bliss

Bruneau

Hammett

Hagerman

Roseworth

King Hill

Castleford

Three Creek

Glenns

Ferry

Murphy Hot Springs

OWYHEE

COUNTY

TWIN FALLS

COUNTY

ELMORE

COUNTY

GOODING

COUNTY

0 1 5 0

Miles

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land

Management. The accuracy, reliability, or

completeness of these data for individual use

or aggregate use with other data is not guaranteed.

Bruneau River-Sheep Creek Wilderness Study Area

Jarbidge River Wilderness Study Area

Lower Salmon Falls Creek Wilderness Study Area
EXHIBIT 32.2




Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002






In connection with the Annual Report of Teliphone Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10–Q/A for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George Metrakos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:




1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ George MetrakosGeorge Metrakos

Principal Financial and Accounting Officer






Dated: April 2, 2010
- Newsroom        - Press Releases
      - Public Statements
      - Speeches
      - Testimony
      - Spotlight Topics
      - Media Gallery
      - Upcoming Events
      - Webcasts
      - What's New
      - SEC Videos
      - Reports and Publications
      - RSS Feeds
      - Social Media 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

**TIME AND DATE:**  Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission Fixed Income Market Structure Advisory Committee ("FIMSAC") will hold a public meeting on Monday, November 4, 2019 at 9:00 a.m.

**PLACE:**  The meeting will be held in Room 443 at the Commission's New York Regional Office, 200 Vesey Street, New York, NY, 10281.

**STATUS:**  The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. and will be open to the public.  Members of the public that wish to attend the meeting in person must complete the registration form on the FIMSAC's webpage at https://www.sec.gov/spotlight/fixed-income-advisory-committee by October 30, 2019.  Doors will open at 8:30 a.m.  Visitors will be subject to security checks.  The meeting will be webcast on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov.

**MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:**  On October 9, 2019, the Commission published notice of the Committee meeting (Release No. 34-87260), indicating that the meeting is open to the public and inviting the public to submit written comments to the Committee.  This Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a majority of the Commission may attend the meeting.

The agenda for the meeting will include updates and presentations from the FIMSAC subcommittees and discussions on secondary market trading in government securities and the transition away from LIBOR.

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:**  For further information, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated:  October 28, 2019

Vanessa A. CountrymanSecretary
#### § 300.5 Assistive technology device.

*Assistive technology device* means any item, piece of equipment, or product system, whether acquired commercially off the shelf, modified, or customized, that is used to increase, maintain, or improve the functional capabilities of a child with a disability. The term does not include a medical device that is surgically implanted, or the replacement of such device.

(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1401(1))
#### § 750.155 State standards.

This part does not prohibit a State from establishing and maintaining standards which are more restrictive with respect to directional and official signs and notices along the Federal-aid highway systems than these national standards.

[38 FR 16044, June 20, 1973, as amended at 40 FR 21934, May 20, 1975]
#### § 710.705 Applicability.

This subpart applies to all concession agreements involving federally funded highways that are executed after January 18, 2009.
# C_2006131EN.01003703.xml

| 3.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/37

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 5 April 2006 — Deutsche Bahn v Commission

(Case T-351/02) (1)

1

(State aid - Competitor's complaint - Directive 92/81/EEC - Excise duties on mineral oils - Mineral oils used as fuel for the purpose of air navigation - Exemption from duty - Letter from the Commission to a complainant - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Challengeable act - Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Concept of aid - Imputability to the State - Equal treatment)

(2006/C 131/69)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Bahn (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: M. Schütte, M. Reysen and W. Kirchhoff, then M. Schütte and M. Reysen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Kreutschitz and J. Flett, agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A.-M. Colaert, F. Florindo Gijón and C. Saile, agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission's decision of 12 September 2002 rejecting a complaint lodged by the applicant on 5 July 2002.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Rejects the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Rejects the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Council to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ 2003 C 31, p. 19.

1

---
#### §§ 316.15-316.19 [Reserved]
#### § 104.2 Application.

This part applies to each recipient of Federal financial assistance from the Department of Education and to the program or activity that receives such assistance.

[65 FR 30936, May 9, 1980, as amended at 65 FR 68054, Nov. 13, 2000]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of VisualMED Clinical
Solutions Corp. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30th,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Gerard Dab, Principal Executive Officer, Secretary and a
member of the Board of Directors of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|                                                                                                                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) The
  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and      
|                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) The
  information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                                                                                           
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Gerard Dab                                                                            
| |                                                                                           
| | Gerard Dab
  Principal Executive Officer, Secretary and a member of the Board of Directors
| |                                                                                           
| | November 13th
  2006                                                                      

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78r), as amended.

---
- Newsroom        - Press Releases
      - Public Statements
      - Speeches
      - Testimony
      - Spotlight Topics
      - Media Gallery
      - Upcoming Events
      - Webcasts
      - What's New
      - SEC Videos
      - Reports and Publications
      - RSS Feeds
      - Social Media 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

**TIME AND DATE:** Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission staff will hold a public roundtable on Monday May 6, 2019 at 9:30 a.m. 

**PLACE:** The roundtable will be held in the Multi-Purpose Room LL-006 at the Commission’s headquarters, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549.  

**STATUS:**  The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public.  Seating will be on a first-come, first-served basis.  Doors will open at 9:00 a.m.  Visitors will be subject to security checks.  The meeting will be webcast on the Commission’s website at www.sec.gov. 

**MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:**The Commission staff will host a roundtable on small business capital formation, with a focus on the experiences of investors and companies raising capital between the U.S. coasts.  The roundtable is open to the public.  This Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a majority of the Commission may attend the meeting.

The agenda for the roundtable will focus on successes and challenges faced by small businesses and their investors as they seek to raise capital, including the impact of rules and regulations under the federal securities laws.****

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:**For further information, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.     

Dated:  April 29, 2019

Vanessa A. CountrymanActing Secretary
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

In re: 

Alice Jean Vasko Case No. 17-13957-BFK

Chapter 13

Debtor

 

MOTION TO EXTEND THE AUTOMATIC STAY

The Debtor, Alice Jean Vasko, by Counsel, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(4)(B), hereby 

requests that this Court enter an order for the extension of the automatic stay provided for under 

11 U.S.C. § 362(a) as to all creditors. In support of this motion, the Debtor states as follows:

1. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 105(a), 28 U.S.C. 

§ 157(b)(1), and 28 U.S.C. § 1334.

2. This is a core proceeding as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).

3. Within the twelve months prior to the said filing date, the Debtor was in an active 

Chapter 13 case, Number 16-14014-BFK, filed November 28, 2016. On October 17, 

2017, this Court entered a Local Bankruptcy Rule Order Dismissing Case. 

4. The Debtor filed the current petition for relief under Chapter 13 on November 20, 

2017.

5. The Debtor filed the current petition with the primary intention of stopping a 

foreclosure. 

6. The Debtor has filed the current case in good faith.

7. The Debtor is willing and able to fully perform the terms of a confirmed Chapter 13 

Plan in the pending case.

8. This motion is not made for purposes of frustration or delay.

WHEREFORE, and for the foregoing reasons, the Debtor respectfully requests pursuant 

to § 362(c)(3)(B) that this Honorable Court order the extension of the automatic stay as provided 

Case 17-13957-BFK Doc 11 Filed 11/27/17 Entered 11/27/17 16:46:06 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
for under 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) as to all creditors, for the duration of the current chapter 13 case or 

until further order of this court.

Date: November 27, 2017 ALICE JEAN VASKO 

By Counsel

NEW DAY LEGAL, PLLC 

By: /s/ John C. Morgan 

John C. Morgan, Esquire, VSB # 30148

Suad Bektic, Esquire, VSB # 90012

98 Alexandria Pike, Suite 10

Warrenton, Virginia 20186

Phone: (540) 349-3232

Facsimile: (888) 612-0943

Counsel for the Debtor

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuant to Local Bankruptcy Rule 9013-1, I hereby certify that on November 27, 2017, I 

have transmitted a true copy of the foregoing document electronically through the Court’s 

CM/ECF system or by mail to the Debtor, Chapter 13 trustee, and to all creditors or parties in 

interest who have requested notices in the case.

/s/ John C. Morgan

 John C. Morgan

Case 17-13957-BFK Doc 11 Filed 11/27/17 Entered 11/27/17 16:46:06 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6895

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LAMONT ALLEN, a/k/a Mont, a/k/a Black Jesus,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CR-92-

154-MJG, CA-01-1220-MJG)

Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 11, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lamont Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Bonnie S. Greenberg, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Lamont Allen seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Allen, Nos. CR-92-154-MJG;

CA-01-1220-MJG (D. Md. filed May 7, 2001; entered May 9, 2001). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §508. Notification of filing and determination of actions

(a) Within one month after the filing of any action under this title, the clerks of the courts of the United States shall send written notification to the Register of Copyrights setting forth, as far as is shown by the papers filed in the court, the names and addresses of the parties and the title, author, and registration number of each work involved in the action. If any other copyrighted work is later included in the action by amendment, answer, or other pleading, the clerk shall also send a notification concerning it to the Register within one month after the pleading is filed.

(b) Within one month after any final order or judgment is issued in the case, the clerk of the court shall notify the Register of it, sending with the notification a copy of the order or judgment together with the written opinion, if any, of the court.

(c) Upon receiving the notifications specified in this section, the Register shall make them a part of the public records of the Copyright Office.

(Pub. L. 94–553, title I, §101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2586.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### house report no. 94–1476

Section 508, which corresponds to some extent with a provision in the patent law (35 U.S.C. 290), is intended to establish a method for notifying the Copyright Office and the public of the filing and disposition of copyright cases. The clerks of the Federal courts are to notify the Copyright Office of the filing of any copyright actions and of their final disposition, and the Copyright Office is to make these notifications a part of its public records.
§ 206.31 How does the Secretary evaluate points for prior experience for HEP and CAMP service delivery? ( a ) In the case of an applicant for a HEP award, the Secretary considers the applicant's experience in implementing an expiring HEP project with respect to— ( 1 ) Whether the applicant served the number of participants described in its approved application;
( 2 ) The extent to which the applicant met or exceeded its funded objectives with regard to project participants, including the targeted number and percentage of— ( i ) Participants who received a general educational development (GED) credential; and
( ii ) GED credential recipients who were reported as entering postsecondary education programs, career positions, or the military; and
( 3 ) The extent to which the applicant met the administrative requirements, including recordkeeping, reporting, and financial accountability under the terms of the previously funded award.
( b ) In the case of an applicant for a CAMP award, the Secretary considers the applicant's experience in implementing an expiring CAMP project with respect to— ( 1 ) Whether the applicant served the number of participants described in its approved application;
( 2 ) The extent to which the applicant met or exceeded its funded objectives with regard to project participants, including the targeted number and percentage of participants who— ( i ) Successfully completed the first year of college; and
( ii ) Continued to be enrolled in postsecondary education after completing their first year of college; and
( 3 ) The extent to which the applicant met the administrative requirements, including recordkeeping, reporting, and financial accountability under the terms of the previously funded award.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070d-2(e))
[75 FR 65770, Oct. 26, 2010]
§ 540.21 Payment of postage. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (d), (e), (f), and (i) of this section, postage charges are the responsibility of the inmate. The Warden shall ensure that the inmate commissary has postage stamps available for purchase by inmates.
( b ) Writing paper and envelopes are provided at no cost to the inmate. Inmates who use their own envelopes must place a return address on the envelope (see § 540.12(d)).
( c ) Inmate organizations will purchase their own postage.
( d ) An inmate who has neither funds nor sufficient postage and who wishes to mail legal mail (includes courts and attorneys) or Administrative Remedy forms will be provided the postage stamps for such mailing. To prevent abuses of this provision, the Warden may impose restrictions on the free legal and administrative remedy mailings.
( e ) When requested by an inmate who has neither funds nor sufficient postage, and upon verification of this status by staff, the Warden shall provide the postage stamps for mailing a reasonable number of letters at government expense to enable the inmate to maintain community ties. To prevent abuses of this provision, the Warden may impose restrictions on the free mailings.
( f ) Mailing at government expense is also allowed for necessary correspondence in verified emergency situations for inmates with neither funds nor sufficient postage.
( g ) Inmates must sign for all stamps issued to them by institution staff.
( h ) Mail received with postage due is not ordinarily accepted by the Bureau of Prisons.
( i ) Holdovers and pre-trial commitments will be provided a reasonable number of stamps for the mailing of letters at government expense.
( j ) Inmates may not be permitted to receive stamps or stamped items (e.g., envelopes embossed with stamps, postal cards with postage affixed) other than by issuance from the institution or by purchase from commissary.
[50 FR 40109, Oct. 1, 1985, as amended at 64 FR 32171, June 15, 1999]