alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 441/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 441 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6318 December 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 441

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6318 December 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2020/C 441/01 | Position (EU) No 16/2020 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget Adopted by the Council on 14 December 2020 | 1 |
| 2020/C 441/02 | Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 16/2020 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget | 11 |

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2020/C 441/01

Position (EU) No 16/2020 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget Adopted by the Council on 14 December 2020

1

2020/C 441/02

Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 16/2020 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget

11

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
-   I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 10-K of Hickok Incorporated (the"registrant");       
      -   Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;   
      -   Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for,the periods presented in this report;   
      -   The registrant's othercertifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant andhave:    a) Designed suchdisclosurecontrols andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; b) Designed such internal control overfinancial reporting, or caused such internal control over financialreporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordancewith generally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant'sdisclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's mostrecentfiscal quarter(the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomateriallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financialreporting;and 
      -  The registrant's othercertifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant'sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors(or persons performing theequivalent functions): 
> a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant'sability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancialinformation; andb) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control overfinancialreporting.

By: 

/s/ R. L. Bauman

R. L. Bauman 

Chief Executive Officer 

December 28,2009
# Official Journal C 66/18 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 66 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4818 March 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 66

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4818 March 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 066/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 066/2 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 2 |
| 2005/C 066/3 | Infringement 2003/4497 — multiple complaint (1) | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 066/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 066/2

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

2

2005/C 066/3

Infringement 2003/4497 — multiple complaint (1)

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 337.2 Oath administered by USCIS or EOIR. ( a ) *Public ceremony.* An applicant for naturalization who has elected to have his or her oath of allegiance administered by USCIS or an immigration judge and is not subject to the exclusive oath administration authority of an eligible court pursuant to section 310(b) of the Act must appear in person in a public ceremony, unless such appearance is specifically excused under the terms and conditions set forth in this part. Such ceremony will be held at a time and place designated by USCIS or EOIR within the United States (or abroad as permitted for certain applicants in accordance with 8 U.S.C. 1443a) and within the jurisdiction where the application for naturalization was filed, or into which the application for naturalization was transferred pursuant to 8 CFR 335.9. Naturalization ceremonies will be conducted at regular intervals as frequently as necessary to ensure timely naturalization, but in all events at least once monthly where it is required to minimize unreasonable delays. Naturalization ceremonies will be presented in such a manner as to preserve the dignity and significance of the occasion.
( b ) *Authority to administer oath of allegiance.* The Secretary may delegate authority to administer the oath of allegiance prescribed in section 337 of the Act to such officials of DHS and to immigration judges or officials designated by the Attorney General as may be necessary for the efficient administration of the naturalization program.
( c ) *Execution of questionnaire.* Immediately prior to being administered the oath of allegiance, each applicant must complete the questionnaire on the form designated by USCIS. USCIS will review each completed questionnaire and may further question the applicant regarding the responses provided. If derogatory information is revealed, USCIS will remove the applicant's name from the list of eligible persons as provided in 8 CFR 335.5 and he or she will not be administered the oath.
[76 FR 53802, Aug. 29, 2011]
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  each of the  undersigned  officers  of  Carbonics
Capital  Corporation (f/k/a GreenShift  Corporation) (the "Company"),  certifies
that:

     1.   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter ended
          June 30, 2009 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of
          Section  13(a)  or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15
          U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




                                      /S/      PAUL T. MILLER
                                      ----------------------------------------
Dated:   August 19 , 2009                      PAUL T. MILLER
                                               Chief Executive Officer

                                      /S/      JACQUELINE FLYNN
                                      ----------------------------------------
Dated:   August 19 , 2009                      JACQUELINE FLYNN
                                               Chief Financial Officer

This  certification  is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,
subject  to the  knowledge  standard  contained  therein,  and not for any other
purpose.
#### Jacob C. Portis, Defendant in Error, v. Bernard Sangerman, Executor, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 14,862.

1. Appeals and *errors—effect of absence of bill of exceptions.*If the record does not contain a hill of exceptions no question is raised as to the evidence or instructions in the court below.

2. *Judgments—when pleadings support.*In an action brought against a defendant styled as executor a judgment against such defendant personally is supported by the common counts; the addition of the title “executor” being regarded as descriptive.

Assumpsit. Error to the County Court of.Cook county; the Hon. William C. DeWolf, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at- the October term, 1908.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 24, 1911.

Charles Herman, for plaintiff in error.

Morton A. Mergentheim, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Baldwin

delivered the opinion of the court.

Jacob C. Portis, real estate broker, sued Bernard Sangerman, executor of the last will and testament of *509Abraham. Singer, deceased, in the Conntv Court of Cook county, and recovered a judgment of $425 as commissions for the sale by Portis of a certain piece of property owned by Singer in his lifetime.

The first count sets out the ownership of certain real estate by the deceased in his lifetime; alleged that defendant was executor of the last will, etc., and had full power to sell the real estate of deceased, and to employ agents for that purpose; that plaintiff was a duly licensed real estate broker, and, as such, made a sale, and was entitled to his commission therefor, etc. To this first count was added the common counts consolidated—to all of which the defendant pleaded the general issue.

The record does not contain any bill of exceptions, and so no question is raised as to the evidence or instructions in the court below, but it is contended the pleadings do not sustain the judgment.

We do not agree with this contention. The judgment entered in this case was not against the defendant as executor, and payable in due course of administration, but was against him personally for $425 and costs, and ordered execution therefor.

The cause of action was really against the defendant personally, and he should, in his settlement with the estate, be given credit for any amounts he legitimately pays out for its benefit. He is primarily liable. As we regard the addition of the title executor to the name of the defendant in the suit as merely descriptive of the person of the defendant, the common counts, at least, charged him personally. See Wolf v. Beaird et al., 123 Ill. 585, and citations therein.

We find no reversible error in the record, and the judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 58 (Friday, March 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 16776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7060]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 21, 2011.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (A. Linwood Gill, III, Vice 
President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
    1. Carroll Bancorp, Inc., Sykesville, Maryland; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Carroll Community Bank, Sykesville, Maryland, upon its conversion from 
a mutual state savings bank to a state-chartered stock commercial bank.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 22, 
2011.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-7060 Filed 3-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
### Comparison of distribution coefficients for strontium exchange from solutions containing one and two competing cations

By: J.S. WahlbergR.S. Dewar

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1140D

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM TELCO-TECHNOLOGY, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                          7,626
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   198,006
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                7,626
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  205,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           58,042
<BONDS>                         0
<COMMON>                        8,870
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                      147,590
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    205,632
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                80,339
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (80,339)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (80,339)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (80,339)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.01)



</TABLE>
#### § 1210.1 Scope.

This part prescribes the requirements necessary to implement 23 U.S.C. 161, which encourages States to enact and enforce zero tolerance laws.
First Department,

March, 1943.

(March 5, 1943.)

#### Stanley Krypka, Appellant, v. New York Dugan Brothers, Inc., Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
AFS-10-221-E 

April 29, 2010 

 Exemption No. 8299C 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-8742 

Mr. Gary G. Olenkiewicz 

U.S. Department of Justice 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

2300 Horizon Drive 

Fort Worth, TX 76177 

Dear Mr. Olenkiewicz: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 8299, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated April 2, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of the U.S. Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), for an 

extension of Exemption No. 8299, as amended. That exemption from §§ 91.117(a), (b), and 

(c); 91.159(a); and 91.209(a)(1) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows the 

DEA to conduct air operations in support of drug law enforcement and drug traffic 

interdiction. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the DEA. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8299, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 8299, as amended, to 

April 30, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 8299, as amended, remain the same. This 

letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 8299. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John W. McGraw 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM TELCO-TECHNOLOGY, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                          24,146
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   198,006
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                24,146
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  222,152
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           38,042
<BONDS>                         0
<COMMON>                        8,870
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                      175,240
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    222,152
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                39,319
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (39,319)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (39,319)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (39,319)
<EPS-BASIC>                   .000
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .000




</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Liska Biometry,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  Christopher J.
LeClerc,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, to my best knowledge
and belief,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


By:    /s/ Christopher J. LeClerc
       Christopher J. LeClerc
       President and CEO

Dated: May 13, 2005

================================================================================
#### In the Matter of Joseph P. McLaughlin against William Wilson, as Commissioner of the Department of Housing and Buildings of the City of New York, et al.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.