alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 17-34665-KLP Doc 7250 Filed 08/23/19 Entered 08/23/19 11:06:00 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case 17-34665-KLP Doc 7250 Filed 08/23/19 Entered 08/23/19 11:06:00 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>     This schedule contains summary financial
information extracted from the balance sheets and the
statements of income filed as part of the annual report
on Form 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such annual report on Form 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                               498,871
<SECURITIES>                         773,464
<RECEIVABLES>                        353,528
<ALLOWANCES>                          78,740
<INVENTORY>                          149,268
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   2,810,515
<PP&E>                             1,524,560
<DEPRECIATION>                        67,340
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     6,886,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                420,929
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                             437,428
<OTHER-SE>                         5,859,930
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       6,886,870
<SALES>                            2,664,488
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   2,664,488
<CGS>                              2,100,550
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      2,100,550
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     710,923
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       502
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      131,394
<INCOME-TAX>                          38,781
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   92,613
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                         851,803
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                            .49
        

</TABLE>
#### § 101.112 Improper conduct.

With respect to any proceeding it is improper for any interested person to attempt to sway the judgement of the reviewing authority by undertaking to bring pressure or influence to bear upon any officer having a responsibility for a decision in the proceeding, or his decisional staff. It is improper that such interested persons or any members of the Department's staff or the presiding officer give statements to communications media, by paid advertisement or otherwise, designed to influence the judgement of any officer having a responsibility for a decision in the proceeding, or his decisional staff. It is improper for any person to solicit communications to any such officer, or his decisional staff, other than proper communications by parties or amici curiae.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 94979 / May 25, 2022

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-16786

In the Matter of

BANKRATE, INC.,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER DIRECTING 

DISBURSEMENT OF FAIR FUND

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-16787

In the Matter of

HYUNJIN LERNER, CPA ,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

On August 28, 2020, the Commission published a Notice of Proposed Plan of 

Distribution and Opportunity for Comment (“Notice”),1pursuant to Rule 1103 of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans (“Commission’s Rules”);2and 

simultaneously posted the Proposed Plan of Distribution (the “Proposed Plan”). The Notice 

advised interested persons that they could obtain a copy of the Proposed Plan from the 

Commission’s public website or by submitting a written request to Keshia Ellis, United States 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 89711 (Aug 28, 2020).

2

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1103.
2

Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-5876. The 

Notice also advised that all persons desiring to comment on the Proposed Plan could submit their 

comments, in writing, within 30 days of the Notice. The Commission received no comments on 

the Proposed Plan during the comment period. On October 15, 2020, the Secretary, pursuant to 

delegated authority, issued an order approving the Proposed Plan,3and posted the approved Plan 

of Distribution (the “Plan”).

The Plan provides for the distribution of the Fair Fund, plus accumulated interest, less 

taxes, fees, and expenses, to the harmed investors according to the methodology set forth in the 

Plan. In accordance with the Plan, the Claims Bar Date has passed and all timely submitted 

claims have been processed by the Fund Administrator. All investors whose claims have been 

denied, in whole or in part, have been notified and provided the opportunity to cure.

Pursuant to the Plan, the Fund Administrator has submitted a payment file to Commission 

staff with a reasonable assurances letter as to the completeness and accuracy of the information 

contained therein. The Commission staff has reviewed and accepted the payment file and 

requests, pursuant to Rule 1101(b)(6) of the Commission’s Rules, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(b)(6), 

that the Commission authorize the transfer of $15,418,912.17 from the Fair Fund to the Fair 

Fund’s escrow account at The Huntington National Bank for distribution by the Fund 

Administrator to the eligible claimants in accordance with the Plan. 

 

3

 See Order Approving Plan of Distribution, Exchange Act Rel. No. 90188 (Oct 15, 2020).
3

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, that Commission staff shall transfer 

$15,418,912.17 from the Fair Fund to the Fair Fund’s escrow account at The Huntington

National Bank, and the Fund Administrator shall distribute such monies to the eligible claimants 

in accordance with the Plan. 

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.4

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

4

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(v).
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 99602 / February 26, 2024

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-20380

In the Matter of the Application of

WILFREDO FELIX

For Review of Action Taken by

FINRA

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ISSUE DECISION

The Commission has determined, in its discretion, that it is appropriate to extend by 90

days the period within which the decision in this matter may be issued. Accordingly, IT IS 

ORDERED that such period be, and hereby is, extended to May 28, 2024.

1

 

By the Commission.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary

1 May 26, 2024 is a Sunday, and May 27, 2024 is a federal holiday.
# AGGLOMERATOR SLURRY TANKS THICKENER LIMESTONE 

## INDURATING AREA HEAT RECOUPF INES TO CHIP REGRIND PREHEAT FANS COOLING FANS 

## FEED PREP AREA

STOCK

PILE GREEN BALL FEED TO

GRATE

LOADING POCKET PELLET TRAINS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Manouch Moshayedi, Chief Executive Officer of STEC, Inc. (the Company), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report of
the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ MANOUCH MOSHAYEDI  
|Manouch Moshayedi      
|Chief Executive Officer

August 11, 2008
### §760–9. Establishment of fish hatchery in Pennsylvania

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to establish, construct, equip, operate, and maintain a new fish hatchery in the northwestern part of the State of Pennsylvania.

(Pub. L. 86–205, §1, Aug. 25, 1959, 73 Stat. 430.)
# Official Journal C 80/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 80 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6310 March 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 80

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6310 March 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 80/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species – supplement 2020/2 | 1 |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| 2020/C 80/02 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species – supplement 2020/2 | 20 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 80/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species – supplement 2020/2

1

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

2020/C 80/02

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species – supplement 2020/2

20

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
§ 54.220 Admissions. ( a ) Admissions to educational institutions prior to June 24, 1973, are not covered by these Title IX regulations.
( b ) *Administratively separate units.* For the purposes only of this section, §§ 54.225 and 54.230, and §§ 54.300 through 54.310, each administratively separate unit shall be deemed to be an educational institution.
( c ) *Application of §§ 54.300 through 54.310 .* Except as provided in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, §§ 54.300 through 54.310 apply to each recipient. A recipient to which §§ 54.300 through 54.310 apply shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in admission or recruitment in violation of §§ 54.300 through 54.310.
( d ) *Educational institutions.* Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section as to recipients that are educational institutions, §§ 54.300 through 54.310 apply only to institutions of vocational education, professional education, graduate higher education, and public institutions of undergraduate higher education.
( e ) *Public institutions of undergraduate higher education.* §§ 54.300 through 54.310 do not apply to any public institution of undergraduate higher education that traditionally and continually from its establishment has had a policy of admitting students of only one sex.
<PAGE>   1


                  EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-68196 on Form S-8 dated September 1, 1993 and Registration Statement No.
333-63597 on Form S-8 dated September 17, 1998 of our report on the consolidated
financial statements and report as to schedules included in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Hickok Incorporated for the year ended September 30, 2000.


/s/ MEADEN & MOORE, LTD.

MEADEN & MOORE, Ltd.
Certified Public Accountants


December 20, 2000
Cleveland, Ohio
October 22, 2010

Mr. Christopher Lambesis Environmental Scientist USEPA Region 5 Land and Chemicals Division 77 West Jackson Blvd. Mail Code LR-8J Chicago, IL 60604-3590 

### Lambesis.christopher@epamail.epa.gov

Re: Authorization for use, release and distribution of electronic mail documents; Owosso Graphic Arts Delisting Petition

Mr. Lambesis,

Pursuant to your request, please accept this letter as formal authorization for the limited use, reproduction and distribution of electronic mail documents and their attachments generated and received by TriMatrix Laboratories, Inc. (TriMatrix). It is our understanding that the correspondences are intended for inclusion in the docket established for the delisting petition submitted by Owosso Graphic Arts, Inc. for the express purpose of establishing the background, basis and reference material necessary to support the petition. Other uses of this correspondence are not authorized without prior consent by TriMatrix.

CC: Kathy Wilson, Owosso Graphic Arts

5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE 4 Grand Rapids, Michigan 49512-5503 • 616.975.4500 • Fax 616.942.7463 ♦ www.trimatrixlabs.com
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

August 31, 2021

In the Matter of

PRIME GLOBAL CAPITAL GROUP 

INCORPORATED,

File No. 500-1

ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF

TRADING

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of PRIME GLOBAL 

CAPITAL GROUP INCORPORATED (“PGCG1”) (CIK No. 1462047), a defaulted Nevada

corporation located in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia with a class of securities registered with the 

Commission pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") Section 12(g) 

because it is delinquent in its periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic 

reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2020. On April 21, 2021, the 

Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance (“Corporation Finance”) sent a delinquency 

letter to PGCG requesting compliance with its periodic filing requirements, which was delivered. 

As of July 27, 2021, the common stock of PGCG was quoted on OTC Link operated by OTC 

Markets Group Inc. (formerly “Pink Sheets”) (“OTC Link”), had four market makers, and was

eligible for the “piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3). 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors 

require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is 

ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the 

 

1 The short form of each issuer’s name is also its stock symbol.
2

securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on 

September 1, 2021, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 15, 2021.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
**Exhibit 99.2**

 
| **PEC Solutions, Inc.** | **[PEC LOGO]** | 12730 Fair Lakes Circle |
|-------------------------|----------------|-------------------------|
|                    |           | Fairfax, VA  22003      |
|                    |           | 703-679-4900  voice     |
|                    |           | 703-679-4901  facsimile |
|                    |           | www.pec.com             |

 

**Certificationof Principal Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18U.S.C. 1350**

**(Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

I, Stuart R. Lloyd, Chief Financial Officer(principal financial officer) of PEC Solutions, Inc. (the “Registrant”),certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon review of the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 of theRegistrant (the “Report”):

 
| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) [15(d)] of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934, as amended; and                   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                      |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Registrant. |

 
| /s/  STUART R. LLOYD |            |
|---------------------------|-----------------|
| Name:                     | Stuart R. Lloyd |   |
| Date:                     | May 14, 2003    |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Each of the undersigned officers of American Realty Investors, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies that:



| | (i) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2006, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company, at and for the periods indicated.
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                                     
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2006 |  | /s/ Steven A. Abney                                 
|                      |  | Steven A. Abney                                     
|                      |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                      |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and     
|                      |  | Acting Principal Executive Officer)
#### Nathan FISHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREENVILLE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; E.E. Ware, Officer #515; T.D. Hampton, Officer; K.D. Durham, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-6073.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 30, 2002.

Decided May 15, 2002.

Nathan Fisher, Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr., Chapman, Harter & Groves, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Nathan Fisher appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) com*145plaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *Fisher v. Greenville County Sheriff’s Office,*No. CA-99-3473-2-08 (D.S.C. Dec. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
THOMAS ECKERT,

Appellant,

v.

PINELLAS COUNTY 

SHERIFF’S OFFICE/PINELLAS 

COUNTY RISK 

MANAGEMENT,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2555

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 31, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims.

Stephen L. Rosen, Judge. 

Date of Accident: May 18, 2010. 

Kimberly A. Hill of Kimberly A. Hill, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, and Tonya A. Oliver 

of Bichler, Oliver, Longo & Fox, PLLC, Tampa, for Appellant.

Nancy S. Meyer of Pinellas County Attorney’s Office, Clearwater, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) to the 

extent that it denies payment of impairment benefits (IBs) “at the correct rate.” 

Specifically, Claimant argues that 23 non-consecutive weeks of the 169 weeks of 
2

IBs to which he was entitled were underpaid – more specifically, paid at half of their 

proper rate. We reverse.

The statute at issue is section 440.15(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2009), and the 

pertinent sentence reads:

Impairment income benefits are paid biweekly at the rate of 75 percent 

of the employee’s average weekly temporary total disability benefit not 

to exceed the maximum weekly benefit under s. 440.12; provided, 

however, that such benefits shall be reduced by 50 percent for each 

week in which the employee has earned income equal to or in excess of 

the employee’s average weekly wage.

(Emphasis added). The Employer/Carrier (E/C), acting under this statute, paid only 

the reduced amount of IBs for the 23 weeks during which Claimant drew from his 

accrued leave (sick leave and vacation leave) instead of working the entirety of his 

scheduled hours. The E/C asserts that when Claimant drew the leave, Claimant’s 

resulting full paycheck constituted “income” equal to his average weekly wage 

(AWW). Claimant, however, persuasively argues that drawn leave cannot count 

toward his AWW for the week in which it is drawn because the leave was previously

accrued, and thus had not been “earned” during each week at issue. It was earned 

and accrued at an earlier time.

The parties concede that the plain meaning of this statute will control. The 

parties disagree, however, on what that plain meaning is. Answering this question of 

first impression, we now hold that the operative word in the statutory sentence is the 

word “earned” and conclude that because the previously accrued leave was not 
3

earned during the week it was drawn but had already vested, it cannot be included 

in the calculation of earnings during the weeks in which IBs are payable for the 

purpose of reducing IBs.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with 

this opinion.

ROBERTS, C.J., WOLF and B.L. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dan Moses, Chief Financial Officer of STEC, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report of the Company
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ DAN MOSES          
|Dan Moses              
|Chief Financial Officer

November 13, 2007
513 Aerial, LLC

Request for Amendments to FAA 333 UAS Exemption

Exemption No. 12413

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 2189

Contact:

Zachary P. Elliott

Co

- owner

513 Aerial, LLC

zachary.elliott@me.com

www.513aerial.comDate: September 20, 2015

Re: Exemption No. 12413

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 2189

513 Aerial is requesting amendments to their existing 333 exemption as listed and described

below. The purpose for the amendments i s to be able to offer the services as listed in the existing

333 exemption. Each amendment will serve to increase the functionality and usefulness of UASs

and the increased functionality will serve to create safer working environments in the industries

in which they are deployed.

1. Additional Aircraft

513 Aerial would like to add an additional UAS to the existing exemptio n. The new craft is a DJI

Inspire 1 Pro.

Manufacturer: DJI

Model No.: Inspire 1 Pro

The Inspire 1 Pro meets all weight, speed and other criteria sp elled out in the 333 exemption.

The Inspire 1 Pro was designed for the purpose of high

- grade aerial photography and

videography.

2. Closed Set Motion Picture and Television Filming

Relief from restriction #2 for filming in closed set movie or tel evision production 513 Aerial

would like to be able to use UASs for video and film production purposes as called out in the

333 exemption. It is therefore req uesting relief from restriction #2 on the 333 exemption for

operation in closed set environments f or movie and television production.