alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                        Ex. 23








EXHIBIT 23:  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


To the Stockholder and Board of Directors of Harris Bankcorp, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-28909 on Form S-3 of Harris Bankcorp, Inc. of our report dated January 30,
1998, relating to the consolidated statements of condition of Harris Bankcorp,
Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholder's equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 1997,
which report appears on page 82 of the December 31, 1997 Annual Report on Form
10-K of Harris Bankcorp, Inc.




KPMG Peat Marwick LLP                           Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

Chicago, Illinois
March 23, 1998
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### United States Mint

# AGENCY:

United States Mint, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The United States Mint is announcing the price of the America the Beautiful Five Ounce Silver Bullion Coin Presentation Case.

A lot of 25 presentation cases will be offered for sale at a price of $86.95.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

B. B. Craig, Associate Director for Sales and Marketing; United States Mint; 801 9th Street NW.; Washington, DC 20220; or call 202-354-7500.

(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 5111, 5112 & 9701.)

Dated: March 23, 2011.

Richard A. Peterson,

Acting Director, United States Mint.

[FR Doc. 2011-7360 Filed 3-28-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-02-P
NO. 07-03-0297-CR IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL B OCTOBER 29, 2003

______________________________ SHAWN O’CONNELL LEWIS, Appellant
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE 108 TH DISTRIC T COURT O F POTT ER COUNTY; NO. 44,391-E; HON. RICHARD DAMBOLD, PRESIDING

_______________________________ Opinion D

ismissing Ap

peal

______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBE LL, JJ. Shawn O’Connell Lewis attemp ts to appeal his conviction for driving while intoxicated. The court imposed his sentence i n open court on April 19, 2002. At that time, he orally informed the trial court of his desire to appeal. However, the record contains no written notice of appeal filed within 30 da ys of April 19 th . Nor does i t contain a ti mely filed motion for new tri al. Inste ad, the first written instrument wherein he mentions h is desire1 The app ropr iate vehi cle f or seeki ng an out -of- ti me appeal from a fi nal f elony convi cti on is by wr it

of habeas corpus pur suant t o Ar ticle 11 .07 of t he T ex as Co de of C rim in al Pr oced ure. See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN . art. 11.07 (Vernon S upp. 2004). to appeal was sent to the district clerkand file-marked July 17, 200 2. In it, appel lant asked about the status of his appeal. Our appellate jurisdic

tion is tri ggered thr

ough a notice of appeal. Ashorn v. State , 77 S.W.3d 405, 409 (Tex. App.–Housto n [1 st Dist.] 2002, pet. ref’d). The not ice must not onlybe ti mely but also in w riting. State v . Riew e , 13 S.W.3d 408, 410 (Tex. Cri m. App. 2000); Ashorn v. State , 77 S.W.3d at 409; see T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2 (c) (requirin g a writte n notice of appeal). An oral notice, even if made i n open court, doesnot suffice. Shute v. State , 744 S.W.2d 96 , 97 (Tex. C rim. App. 1988); Ashorn v. State , 77 S.W.3d at 407; Brunswick

v. State , 931 S.W.2d 9, 11 (Tex. App.–Hous ton [1 st Dist.] 1996, no pet.). Given this, appellant’s o ral noti ce on April 1 9, 2002, failed to s atisfy appell ate rule 25.2( c) and trigger our jurisdiction. Nor did the m issive file-marked by the distri ct clerk i n July of 2002 fill the void given its belatedness (and assuming it satisfied th e other requirements of Rule 25.2)

. Consequently , we dismi ss the appeal for w ant of jurisdic

tion. 1

Brian Quinn Justice Do not publish

.
(No. 77-CC-2007

#### Harold Bendicsen, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed September 7,1978.*

Holderman J.

This matter comes before the Court on a claim filed by Claimant and motion of Respondent for judgment on the pleadings.

Claimant was a superintendent of Herrick House Children’s Center at the time of the incident that caused the damages of which Claimant complains.

Claimant alleges that his car was parked on the grounds of the institution, that it had been locked, that it was damaged and vandalized, and that said car had an inside hood release which was working at the time of the incident and by being forced caused most of the damage on which this claim is based.

Respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is based primarily on the fact that Claimant was either negligent in failing to maintain adequate control over the residents which would constitute negligence on the part of Claimant and that if he was negligent, he cannot recover from his own negligent action.

*730It is also the State’s contention that it was the responsibility of Claimant to prevent the very action of which he now seeks to recover. If an award were granted, it would have to be based upon the fact that the State was negligent in failing to prevent the act in question and would be in fact compensating him for his own failure to perform the duties for which he was hired.

Exhibits, in the form of letters, attached to the complaint state the damage was done by one or more residents of the Center although the identity of the guilty party or parties has never been determined.

An award can be granted in cases such as the present one only when there is negligence on the part of the State and no contributory negligence on the part of Claimant.

The State is only liable where there is some negligence on its part and, as stated above, the State could only have been negligent in the present case by failing to properly supervise the inmate or inmates who caused the damage. To make a finding to that effect would put the State in a position of being an insurer which it is not.

An award cannot be made to an individual working for the State when it is the responsibility of that individual to prevent incidents such as the one on which this claim is based. To hold otherwise would amount to an award based upon contributory negligence of the Claimant.

Motion for judgment on the pleadings is hereby granted and said cause is dismissed.
§ 110.22 Information requirements. Each recipient shall— ( a ) Provide ED with information that ED determines is necessary to ascertain whether the recipient is in compliance with the Act and these regulations; and
( b ) Permit reasonable access by ED to the books, records, accounts, reports, and other recipient facilities and sources of information to the extent ED determines is necessary to ascertain whether a recipient is in compliance with the Act and these regulations.
(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6103)
### §81l. Additional exchange of lands

In order to consolidate Federal holdings in, and to improve, Colonial National Historical Park, the Secretary of the Interior, when he finds that the public interest will be served thereby, is authorized to accept on behalf of the United States from the York County School Board, State of Virginia, the conveyance of any land or interests in land located within the authorized area of the Colonial National Historical Park, together with the structures situated upon such properties, as may be agreed upon by the Secretary and the school board; and, in exchange therefor, to convey on behalf of the United States to the school board not more than fifty-five acres of land or interests in land situated within the Colonial National Historical Park.

(May 13, 1953, ch. 38, 67 Stat. 27.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act July 3, 1930, ch. 837, 46 Stat. 855, which comprises this subchapter.
!"#"$%$& '%#' !&()!'#""!

*+,(-%$.,"!-$#'("%!("()#""!*+

 "!""!$.,"()!'%!,,(-'&

  "!  "  "!  *+  ,(-  #  ")! /&%    "$&  ()(

" . (,0

# ""!,!$)!'("	''!,-!' %*++

 
'!!!(%"!!1%-!2++223,"!'0
0%"!*+ %456

$,'0% 762%"!!1%	2++263##,#"(! %)

829%(!'
 '(-%266!$&%#'1%-!2+9*63!(")!/&%2+*8

((!(%-!
!,"%	2+79*0

!(:;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

<

	





 ! "

#$%&'
(

)*+,

(-
&...

 / !0.1/ 2/

Nov 21 2018

/s/ Frank J. Santoro

Entered on Docket: Nov 21, 2018

Case 18-73535-FJS Doc 19 Filed 11/21/18 Entered 11/21/18 16:06:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
/!1#":

;==;;0!&';;;;;;;;;;;

0!&'

 '#"$

:

;;==;/!"#;;;;;;;;;;;

,"!'
0

"!*+ 

	

 "$& ,#&"!  !,,(!,  " ,!' ' >622?*@A"  ( "! $

(($&!'',!&!!(! #--,&"!$)!'( !'',(%

 %!(00 0

;;==;0!&';;;;;;;;;

0!&'

 '#"$

	





 ! "

#$%&'
(

)*+,

(-
&...

 / !0.1/ 2/

Case 18-73535-FJS Doc 19 Filed 11/21/18 Entered 11/21/18 16:06:32 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
Case 17-31970-KRH Doc 17 Filed 06/30/17 Entered 06/30/17 09:42:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 12
Case 17-31970-KRH Doc 17 Filed 06/30/17 Entered 06/30/17 09:42:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 12
Case 17-31970-KRH Doc 17 Filed 06/30/17 Entered 06/30/17 09:42:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 12
Case 17-31970-KRH Doc 17 Filed 06/30/17 Entered 06/30/17 09:42:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 12
Case 17-31970-KRH Doc 17 Filed 06/30/17 Entered 06/30/17 09:42:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 12
Case 17-31970-KRH Doc 17 Filed 06/30/17 Entered 06/30/17 09:42:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 12
Case 17-31970-KRH Doc 17 Filed 06/30/17 Entered 06/30/17 09:42:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 12
Case 17-31970-KRH Doc 17 Filed 06/30/17 Entered 06/30/17 09:42:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 12
Case 17-31970-KRH Doc 17 Filed 06/30/17 Entered 06/30/17 09:42:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 12
Case 17-31970-KRH Doc 17 Filed 06/30/17 Entered 06/30/17 09:42:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 12
Case 17-31970-KRH Doc 17 Filed 06/30/17 Entered 06/30/17 09:42:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 11 of 12
Case 17-31970-KRH Doc 17 Filed 06/30/17 Entered 06/30/17 09:42:34 Desc Main

 Document Page 12 of 12
#### § 343b.2 Number of applications required.

A special certificate of naturalization is delivered to one foreign government official only. An applicant who desires recognition as a U.S. citizen by more than one foreign official, whether in the same country or not, must file a separate application for each certificate required.

[32 FR 9636, July 4, 1967]
#### Constance Stupore et al., Appellants, v. Avanti Realty Corporation et al., Respondents.

Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
### §743. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–280, §1(2), May 10, 1974, 88 Stat. 123

Section, act Mar. 3, 1885, ch. 360, §1(1), 23 Stat. 494, renumbered by Pub. L. 93–280, §1(1), May 10, 1974, 88 Stat. 123, was part of a paragraph entitled: "Propagation of Food Fishes" in the Sundry Civil Expenses Appropriation Act, 1886. It authorized the Secretary of the Treasury to detail Coast Guard personnel to the Fish and Wildlife Services for duty. See section 743a of this title.
#### Chotapeg, Inc., v. Sylvia M. Bullowa.

Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
#### Horatio H. Mason *v.*Reuben J. Holcomb.

*Costs—of cleric of circuit court.*Under the statute of 1874, regulating fees and salaries, clerks of the circuit court are entitled to but one charge at each term of the court for docketing a cause.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of DeKalb county; the Hon. Theodore D. Murphy, Judge, presiding.

Mr. Charles Kellum, for the appellant.

Mr. R. L. Divine, for the appellee.

Mr. Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This is an appeal from a judgment in the DeKalb circuit court, overruling a motion submitted by appellant to quash a fee bill which had been issued by the clerk of that court, and which had been replevied under the statute. The objectionable charges were the following items: September, 1872, docketing suit three times, 45 cents; February, 1873, docketing suit three times, 45 cents; October, 1873, docketing suit three times, 45, cents.

The inference is, that suit was commenced to the September term, 1872, and continued to the February term, 1873, and again continued to the October term of that year.

It is insisted by appellant, there is no authority of law for these charges, and we are referred to the statute regulating “Fees and Salaries,” (R. S. 1874, p. 504, section 14) in support of his objection. That part of the section applicable is as follows: For docketing suit each time, in counties of the first class, 20 cents; in counties of the second class, 15 cents. It is understood DeKalb is a county in the second class.

Prior to 1872, the provision on this subject was, “For entering each suit on the docket for trial, 10 cents.” Whilst this was the law, the case of *Kerp*v. *Fuchs,*43 Ill. 492, was before *612thia court, wherein it appeared the clerk of the circuit court of Bureau county had charged in his fee bill ten cents each for entering a cause on the docket of the judge, of the clerk, and of the bar. On a motion to retax the costs, the circuit court denied the same, and it was held by this court, on appeal, that the clerk was entitled to charge ten cents only for placing the cause on each docket; that there was but one docket, the others being copies only, and no fee was allowed for entering the cause on the copy. The act then in force allowed one fee only for docketing a suit, without reference to the number of times it would be necessary to docket it owing to continuances from one term to another. The present law repairs that defect by allowing a fee for each time or term the cause is docketed, following out the suggestion of this court in the above cited case. There is no pretence for the charge under this law. For docketing the cause the clerk is entitled to fifteen cents only. There is but one docket which the clerk has to supply, in which he makes his original entries. This is the court docket; the others are mere copies. For each time he enters a cause on this docket he can claim fifteen cents, and no more.

The circuit court erred in refusing to quash the fee bill, and for the error the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to quash the same.

*Judgment reversed.*
#### Nunzio Orsino, Respondent, v. Grace Orsino and Others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed by default, with costs. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1236

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1236 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10354, Mar. 5, 2003.

#### § 1236.5 Fingerprints and photographs.

Every alien 14 years of age or older against whom proceedings based on deportability under section 237 of the Act are commenced under this part by service of a notice to appear shall be fingerprinted and photographed. Such fingerprints and photographs shall be made available to Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies upon request to the district director or chief patrol agent having jurisdiction over the alien's record. Any such alien, regardless of his or her age, shall be photographed and/or fingerprinted if required by any immigration officer authorized to issue a notice to appear. Every alien 14 years of age or older who is found to be inadmissible to the United States and ordered removed by an immigration judge shall be fingerprinted, unless during the preceding year he or she has been fingerprinted at an American consular office.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 88395 / March 16, 2020

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-16098

____________________________________

:

In the Matter of :

:

Wilmington Trust Corporation, : ORDER APPOINTING

: TAX ADMINISTRATOR

Respondent. :

____________________________________:

By order dated February 22, 2019, the Commission issued the “Omnibus Order Directing the 

Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that Establish Distribution 

Funds” (“Omnibus Order”),1authorizing the Secretary to issue orders for calendar years 2019-2021

appointing, upon request by the Commission staff, Miller Kaplan Arase LLP (“Miller Kaplan”), a 

certified public accounting firm, with one of their offices located in San Francisco, California, as 

tax administrator (“Tax Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund 

may incur tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department 

of the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On March 10, 2020, the Commission staff requested the appointment of Miller Kaplan as 

the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Miller Kaplan, pursuant to and in accordance with the 

Omnibus Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 85174 (Feb. 22, 2019).
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

## Water Analysis
Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 5/17/2012 Form REP-702 Rev. 0, 4/2012



### Sample Number: 122141-001 Date Collected:05/09/2012 07:45 Date Received:5/9/2012 

### 1st Stage Feed Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ug/L Selenium, Se 231 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 05/14/2012 13:18 

### Sample Number: 122141-002 Date Collected:05/09/2012 07:45 Date Received:5/9/2012 

## 2nd Stage Feed Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ug/L Selenium, Se 38.2 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 05/14/2012 13:23 

### Sample Number: 122141-003 Date Collected:05/09/2012 07:45 Date Received:5/9/2012 

## Bioreactor Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ug/L Selenium, Se 0.9 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 05/14/2012 13:28

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 122141 Page 1 of 1
§ 287.3 Disposition of cases of aliens arrested without warrant. ( a ) *Examination.* An alien arrested without a warrant of arrest under the authority contained in section 287(a)(2) of the Act will be examined by an officer other than the arresting officer. If no other qualified officer is readily available and the taking of the alien before another officer would entail unnecessary delay, the arresting officer, if the conduct of such examination is a part of the duties assigned to him or her, may examine the alien.
( b ) *Determination of proceedings.* If the examining officer is satisfied that there is prima facie evidence that the arrested alien was entering, attempting to enter, or is present in the United States in violation of the immigration laws, the examining officer will refer the case to an immigration judge for further inquiry in accordance with 8 CFR parts 235, 239, or 240, order the alien removed as provided for in section 235(b)(1) of the Act and § 235.3(b) of this chapter, or take whatever other action may be appropriate or required under the laws or regulations applicable to the particular case.
( c ) *Notifications and information.* Except in the case of an alien subject to the expedited removal provisions of section 235(b)(1)(A) of the Act, an alien arrested without warrant and placed in formal proceedings under section 238 or 240 of the Act will be advised of the reasons for his or her arrest and the right to be represented at no expense to the Government. The examining officer will provide the alien with a list of the available free legal services provided by organizations and attorneys qualified under 8 CFR part 1003 and organizations recognized under § 292.2 of this chapter or 8 CFR 1292.2 that are located in the district where the hearing will be held. The examining officer shall note on Form I-862 that such a list was provided to the alien. The officer will also advise the alien that any statement made may be used against him or her in a subsequent proceeding.
( d ) *Custody procedures.* Unless voluntary departure has been granted pursuant to subpart C of 8 CFR part 240, a determination will be made within 48 hours of the arrest, except in the event of an emergency or other extraordinary circumstance in which case a determination will be made within an additional reasonable period of time, whether the alien will be continued in custody or released on bond or recognizance and whether a notice to appear and warrant of arrest as prescribed in 8 CFR parts 236 and 239 will be issued.
[62 FR 10390, Mar. 6, 1997, as amended at 66 FR 48335, Sept. 20, 2001; 68 FR 35276, June 13, 2003]
#### § 101.35 Date of service.

The date of service shall be the day when the matter is deposited in the U.S. mail or is delivered in person, except that the date of service of the initial notice of hearing or opportunity for hearing shall be the date of its delivery, or of its attempted delivery if refused.
**SECURITIES      AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**Washington,      D.C. 20549**

**FORM      8-K**

**CURRENT      REPORT**

**Pursuant      to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934**

| Delaware                                                                                        |   | **000-23143**                          |   | **13-3379479**                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
| (State                or other jurisdictionof                incorporation)                     |   | (CommissionFile                Number) |   | (IRS                EmployerIdentification                No.) |
|                                                                                            |   |                                   |   |                                                           |
| 777                Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, New York                                 |   | 10591                                  |
| (Address                of principal executive offices)                                         |   | (Zip                Code)              |
| Registrant's                telephone number, including area code (914)                789-2800 |

*see *

----

**Item      2.02   Results of Operations and Financial      Condition.**

**Item      9.01   Financial Statements and Exhibits.**

**Exhibit      No.**
**Description**

----

**SIGNATURES**

----