alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Appendix 2_10C Streamflow statistics for site S23 estimated using a drainage-area-ratio method and historical 

streamflows (Olson. S.A., and Mack,T.J., 2011, Technique for estimation of streamflow statistics in mineral areas of interest in Afghanistan: 

U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011-1176)

[km2, square kilometer; mm, milimeter; m, meter; m3/s, cubic meter per second; The streamgage, listed with Afghan identification number, 

is the historical site used for the ungaged site estimate.]

Drainage area: 8700.3 km232.1

Basin slope percent: 28.3 6.8 mm

Centroid elevation: 3048.3 m 16.8 mm

Basin percent irrigated: 6.29 32.7 mm

47.1 mm

Streamgage: Arghandab River at Mizan (321000066270000) 4-1.L00-6A

Drainage area, km2: 9337 Results

Streamgage data: Ungaged site estimate: area exponent

7Q10: 2.13 m

3

/s 1.97 m

3

/s 1.14

7Q2: 5.99 m

3

/s 5.57 m

3

/s 1.03

90% flow duration: 6.23 m

3

/s 5.71 m

3

/s 1.25

80% flow duration: 10.3 m

3

/s 9.48 m

3

/s 1.18

Mean annual discharge: 41.8 m

3

/s 38.85 m

3

/s 1.04

October mean monthly discharge: 10.6 m

3

/s 9.81 m

3

/s 1.10

November mean monthly discharge: 15.3 m

3

/s 14.17 m

3

/s 1.09

December mean monthly discharge: 18.3 m

3

/s 16.96 m

3

/s 1.08

January mean monthly discharge: 21 m

3

/s 19.48 m

3

/s 1.06

February mean monthly discharge: 39.7 m

3

/s 36.99 m

3

/s 1.00

March mean monthly discharge: 96.9 m

3

/s 90.81 m

3

/s 0.92

April mean monthly discharge: 152 m

3

/s 142.66 m

3

/s 0.90

May mean monthly discharge: 70.8 m

3

/s 65.75 m

3

/s 1.05

June mean monthly discharge: 22.4 m

3

/s 20.61 m

3

/s 1.18

July mean monthly discharge: 22.7 m

3

/s 21.03 m

3

/s 1.08

August mean monthly discharge: 12 m

3

/s 11.13 m

3

/s 1.06

September mean monthly discharge: 8.01 m

3

/s 7.42 m

3

/s 1.09

October minimum monthly discharge: 4.35 m

3

/s 4.00 m

3

/s 1.20

November minimum monthly discharge: 9.86 m

3

/s 9.06 m

3

/s 1.19

December minimum monthly discharge: 12.8 m

3

/s 11.77 m

3

/s 1.18

January minimum monthly discharge: 14.8 m

3

/s 13.58 m

3

/s 1.21

February minimum monthly discharge: 26.2 m

3

/s 24.12 m

3

/s 1.17

March minimum monthly discharge: 46 m

3

/s 42.73 m

3

/s 1.04

April minimum monthly discharge: 50 m

3

/s 46.48 m

3

/s 1.03

May minimum monthly discharge: 17.1 m

3

/s 15.74 m

3

/s 1.17

June minimum monthly discharge: 6.18 m

3

/s 5.64 m

3

/s 1.30

July minimum monthly discharge: 4.19 m

3

/s 3.84 m

3

/s 1.25

August minimum monthly discharge: 4.21 m

3

/s 3.84 m

3

/s 1.29

September minimum monthly discharge: 2.67 m

3

/s 2.44 m

3

/s 1.27

Mean January precipitation:

Basin Characteristics:

Basin percent above 3000 m:

Mean October precipitation:

Mean November precipitation:

Mean December precipitation:
### §583j–4. Volunteers

The Secretary may accept, without regard to the civil service classification laws, rules and regulations, any director, officer, employee or agent of the Foundation as a volunteer for purposes of the Volunteers in the National Forests Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 558a through 558d; 86 Stat. 147).

(Pub. L. 101–593, title IV, §406, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2973.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Volunteers in the National Forests Act of 1972, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 92–300, May 18, 1972, 86 Stat. 147, which is classified generally to section 558a et seq. of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 558a of this title and Tables.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000047268
<NAME> HI-SHEAR INDUSTRIES INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,952
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,105
<PP&E>                                             206
<DEPRECIATION>                                      91
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,555
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              640
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              614
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,555
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,773
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,259)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        24
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,283)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,283)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)
        

</TABLE>
§ 650.209 Construction. ( a ) Permanent erosion and sediment control measures and practices shall be established and implemented at the earliest practicable time consistent with good construction and management practices.
( b ) Implementation of temporary erosion and sediment control measures and practices shall be coordinated with permanent measures to assure economical, effective, and continuous control throughout construction.
( c ) Erosion and sediment control measures and practices shall be monitored and maintained or revised to insure that they are fulfilling their intended function during the construction of the project.
( d ) Federal-aid funds shall not be used in erosion and sediment control actions made necessary because of contractor oversight, carelessness, or failure to implement sufficient control measures.
( e ) Pollutants used during highway construction or operation and material from sediment traps shall not be stockpiled or disposed of in a manner which makes them susceptible to being washed into any watercourse by runoff or high water. No pollutants shall be deposited or disposed of in watercourses.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498

 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Heavy-Duty Hybrid Onboard Diagnostics

FROM: Amy Kopin

TO: The Docket

DATE: July 15, 2011

On April 28th, 2011 we held a conference call with the California Air Resources Board 

(CARB) to discuss concerns raised by hybrid manufacturers, engine manufacturers, and related 

industry trade groups regarding heavy-duty onboard diagnostic (OBD) requirements and timing. 

Concerns were raised during the comment period for the heavy-duty greenhouse gas notice of 

proposed rulemaking that heavy-duty hybrid applications may not be able to meet the 2013 

heavy-duty OBD regulations that were published in the 2009 OBD Final Rulemaking.

1,2

 

Specifically, their comments include a request for a delay of the application of HD OBD 

requirements for hybrid applications until 2020. Attendees from the EPA and CARB are shown 

in the table below.

Attendee Affiliation 

Cleophas Jackson EPA – Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division 

Anthony Neam EPA – Assessment and Standards Division 

Amy Kopin EPA – Assessment and Standards Division 

Lucina Negrete CARB

Jack Kitowski CARB

Michael McCarthy CARB

Joe Calavita CARB

Jessica Dean CARB

Michael Regenfuss CARB

Ajay Chaudhary CARB

 

1 U.S. EPA, NHTSA, and DOT, “Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Mediumand Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles,” republished December 29, 2010. Available here: 

http://origin.www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-12-29/html/2010-32726.htm

2 U.S. EPA, “Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicles Engines; Final Rule 

Regulations Requiring Onboard Diagnostic Systems on 2010 and Later Heavy-Duty Engines Used in Highway 

Applications Over 14,000 Pounds; Revisions to Onboard Diagnostic Requirements for Diesel Highway Heavy-Duty 

Vehicles Under 14,000 Pounds,” published February 24, 2009. Available here: 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/im/obd/regtech/hd-obd-frm-02-24-09-notice-74-fr-8310.pdf

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION
### §718s. Electronic stamp requirements; recognition of electronic stamp

#### (a) Stamp requirements

The Secretary shall require an electronic stamp issued by a State under this subchapter—

(1) to have the same format as any other license, validation, or privilege the State issues under the automated licensing system of the State; and

(2) to specify identifying features of the licensee that are adequate to enable Federal, State, and other law enforcement officers to identify the holder.

#### (b) Recognition of electronic stamp

Any electronic stamp issued by a State under this subchapter shall—

(1) bestow upon the licensee the same privileges as are bestowed by an actual stamp;

(2) be recognized nationally as a valid Federal migratory bird hunting and conservation stamp; and

(3) authorize the licensee to hunt migratory waterfowl in any other State, in accordance with the laws of the other State governing that hunting.

#### (c) Duration

An electronic stamp issued by a State shall be valid through the first June 30 that occurs after the date of issuance of the electronic stamp by the State.

(Pub. L. 113–239, §6, Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2849; Pub. L. 118–25, §2(c), Dec. 19, 2023, 137 Stat. 130.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2023—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 118–25, §2(c)(1), substituted "shall—" for "shall, during the effective period of the electronic stamp—" in introductory provisions.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 118–25, §2(c)(2), substituted "through the first June 30 that occurs after the date of issuance of the electronic stamp by the State" for "for a period agreed to by the State and the Secretary, which shall not exceed 45 days".
## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 23-13384

____________________
U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS LEGAL TITLE TRUSTEE FOR TRUMAN 2016 SC6 TITLE TRUST, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus VALERIA TAVERAS, a.k.a. Valeria Rosa Taveras, ELIEZER TAVERAS, a.k.a. Eliezer Taveras, Sr.,

Defendants-Appellants,

REUNION RESORT & CLUB OF ORLANDO MASTER ASSOCIATION, INC. et al., USCA11 Case: 23-13384 Document: 8-2 Date Filed: 12/01/2023 Page: 1 of 32 Order of the Court 23-13384

Defendants.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 6:23-cv-01493-WWB-EJK

____________________
Before J ILL P RYOR , B RANCH , and L AGOA , Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT: This appeal is DISMISSED in part, sua sponte , for lack of jurisdiction. Eliezar Taveras and Valeria Taveras appeal, pro se , from a magistrate judge’s September 12 , 2022, order denying them leave to amend their notice of removal. The magistrate judge’s order, however, is not final or appealable to this Court, as an appeal from a magistrate judge’s order must be taken to the district court. See United States v. Schultz , 565 F.3d 1353, 1359 (11th Cir. 2009). Even if the district judge ultimately af firms the order, that subsequent affirmance would not cure the Ta verases’s premature notice of appeal. See Perez-Priego v. Alachua Cnty. Clerk of Ct. , 148 F.3d 1272, 1273 (11th Cir. 1998). The Taverases also appeal the district court’s October 11, 2023, order remanding the underlyi ng action to state court. The order was based on the district cour t’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), and we generally lack jurisdiction to review such orders. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)-(d). However, USCA11 Case: 23-13384 Document: 8-2 Date Filed: 12/01/2023 Page: 2 of 323-13384 Order of the Court 3

because the Taverases’s notice of removal listed 28 U.S.C. § 1443 as a basis for removal, we have jurisdiction to review the district court’s remand order, including it s implicit determination that removal was not warranted under § 1443. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)-(d); BP P.L.C. v. Mayor of Balt. , 141 S. Ct. 1532, 1538 (2021); Alabama v. Conley , 245 F.3d 1292, 1293 n.1 (11th Cir. 2001). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review the magistrate judge’s September 12, 2022, order. However, this appeal may proceed as to the district court’s Oc tober 11, 2023, remand order.No motion for reconsideration may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 27-2 and all other applicable rules. USCA11 Case: 23-13384 Document: 8-2 Date Filed: 12/01/2023 Page: 3 of 3
#### § 669.21 Procedure for evaluating state compliance.

The FHWA shall periodically review the State's procedures for complying with 23 U.S.C. 141(c), including an inspection of supporting documentation and records. In those States where a branch office of the State, a local jurisdiction, or a private entity is providing services to register motor vehicles including vehicles subject to HVUT, the State shall be responsible for ensuring that these entities comply with the requirements of this part concerning the collection and retention of evidence of payment of the HVUT as a condition of registration for vehicles subject to such tax and develop adequate procedures to maintain such compliance. The State or other responsible entity shall retain a copy of the receipted IRS Schedule 1 (Form 2290), or an acceptable substitute prescribed by 26 CFR part 41 sec. 41.6001-2 for a period of 1 year for purposes of evaluating State compliance with 23 U.S.C. 141(c) by the FHWA. The State may develop a software system to maintain copies or images of this proof-of-payment.

[75 FR 43409, July 26, 2010]
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Equality Investments,  Inc.,
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  B.
Stephen Bailey,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 93032 / September 16, 2021

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension of trading 

in the securities of the following issuer, commencing at 9:30 a.m. EDT on September 17, 2021 

and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 30, 2021:

 MyDx, Inc. (MYDX)

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of the foregoing company due 

to a lack of current and accurate information about the company because it has not filed certain 

periodic reports with the Commission. This order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).

The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by this company.

Brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11, at 

the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered relating to the securities 

of the subject company unless and until the broker or dealer has strictly complied with all of the 

provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by the rule, it 

should refrain from entering quotations relating to the securities of this company that has been 

subject to a trading suspension until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is 

certain that all of its provisions have been met. Any broker or dealer with questions regarding

the rule should contact the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, DC 

at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of the rule,

the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action. 

If any broker, dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, they 

should immediately communicate it to the Delinquent Filings Branch of the Division of 

Enforcement at (202) 551-5466, or by e-mail at DelinquentFilings@sec.gov.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and (b))



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby individually certifies in his capacity as an officer of USI Holdings Corporation (the Company) that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of and for the periods covered by such Report.



|                   |                        
|------------------ | -----------------------
|Dated: May 8, 2006 | /s/ DAVIDL. ESLICK     
|                   | David L. Eslick        
|                   | Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and (b)) and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by the above signatory to the extent of his respective knowledge.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to USI Holdings Corporation and will be retained by USI Holdings Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 215.23 Definitions. The following definitions apply for purposes of this subpart. ( a ) *Covered alien.* A covered alien is a nonimmigrant alien who holds a passport issued by an EVUS country (as defined in paragraph (c) of this section) containing a U.S. nonimmigrant visa of a designated category.
( b ) *Electronic Visa Update System (EVUS).* The Electronic Visa Update System (EVUS) is the electronic system used by a covered alien to provide required information to DHS after the receipt of his or her visa of a designated category.
( c ) *EVUS country.* An EVUS country is a country that has been identified for inclusion in EVUS, through publication of a notice in the Federal Register, by the Secretary after consultation with the Secretary of State.
( d ) *Notification of compliance.* A notification of compliance is a verification from CBP that a covered alien has successfully enrolled in EVUS. A notification of compliance is a positive determination that an alien's visa is: ( 1 ) Not automatically provisionally revoked pursuant to 22 CFR 41.122(b)(3); and
( 2 ) Is considered valid for travel to the United States as of the time of notification.
**Exhibit99**

**UNDERTAKINGS**

For the purposesof complying with the amendments to the rules governing Form S-8 under theSecurities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”), the Registrant hereby undertakesas follows, which undertaking shall be incorporated by reference intoRegistrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 Nos. 333-04273 (filed May 22,1996); 333-17155 (filed December 2, 1996); 333-41447 (filed December 4, 1997);333-92531 (filed December 10, 1999); 333-36252 (filed May 4, 2000); 333-04273(filed July 21, 2000); 333-72906 (filed November 7, 2001); 333-115922 (filedMay 27, 2004); and 333-122019 (filed January 13, 2005):

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the SecuritiesAct may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of theRegistrant, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of theSecurities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against publicpolicy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.  In the event that a claim for indemnificationagainst such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expensesincurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrantin the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted bysuch director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securitiesbeing registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel thematter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court ofappropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it isagainst public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governedby the final adjudication of such issue.

----