alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4761 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4761

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To ensure U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers, agents, and 
  other personnel have adequate synthetic opioid detection equipment, 
   that the Department of Homeland Security has a process to update 
     synthetic opioid detection capability, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``DHS Opioid Detection Resilience Act 
of 2019''.

SEC. 2. STRATEGY TO ENSURE DETECTION OF ALL OPIOID PURITY LEVELS AT 
              PORTS OF ENTRY.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
section, the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 
shall--
            (1) implement a strategy to ensure deployed chemical 
        screening devices are able to identify in an operational 
        environment narcotics at purity levels less than or equal to 10 
        percent, or provide ports of entry with an alternate method for 
        identifying narcotics at lower purity levels; and
            (2) require testing of any new chemical screening devices 
        to understand the abilities and limitations of such devices 
        relating to identifying narcotics at various purity levels 
        before CBP commits to the acquisition of such devices.

SEC. 3. PLAN TO ENSURE OPIOID DETECTION EQUIPMENT RESILIENCY.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
section, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall implement a plan for 
the long-term development of a centralized spectral database for 
chemical screening devices. Such plan shall address the following:
            (1) How newly identified spectra will be collected, stored, 
        and distributed to such devices in their operational 
        environment, including at ports of entry.
            (2) Identification of parties responsible for updates and 
        maintenance of such database.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 9, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 4761

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To ensure U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers, agents, and 
  other personnel have adequate synthetic opioid detection equipment, 
   that the Department of Homeland Security has a process to update 
     synthetic opioid detection capability, and for other purposes.
```
[changead ver. 02/08] 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

CHANGE OF ADDRESS

Other than for an attorney, if the Debtor/Creditor whose address is changing is a party in an Adversary 

Proceeding before the Court, the Change of Address must be filed in the Adversary Proceeding as well as in 

the Bankruptcy Case. If debtor has both a street and mailing address, please indicate which address is being 

updated. 

For: Debtor 

 Attorney [If Applicable:] Name: ____________________________________ 

 Creditor 

If joint case, please check the appropriate box as set out below: 

 New address is for: Husband and Wife 

 Husband Only

 Wife Only

[If applicable] Case Name: ________________________________________________ 

[If applicable] Case No./Adversary Proceeding No.: ____________________________ 

[If applicable] Creditor Name: _____________________________________________ 

 Street Address Mailing Address 

New Address: __________________________________________________________ 

 No. and Street, Apt., P. O. Box or R. D. No. 

 City: ___________________________ State: ______ Zip: ______ 

 Street Address Mailing Address 

Old Address: ____________________________________________________________ 

 No. and Street, Apt., P. O. Box or R. D. No. 

 

City: ___________________________ State: ______ Zip: ______ 

 Telephone Number: (_____) ______________________________ 

 Please include area code

Signature of Filer [check filer type below]: 

 Attorney for Debtor 

 Debtor [If joint case and address is for husband and 

 wife, both debtors must sign.]

 Creditor 

 Attorney 

Date: _________________________ 

pc: Trustee 

 United States Trustee 

 Creditor (for creditor’s change of address) 

Case 17-31588-KRH Doc 16 Filed 09/05/17 Entered 09/05/17 14:25:54 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
§ 940.9 Regional ITS architecture. ( a ) A regional ITS architecture shall be developed to guide the development of ITS projects and programs and be consistent with ITS strategies and projects contained in applicable transportation plans. The National ITS Architecture shall be used as a resource in the development of the regional ITS architecture. The regional ITS architecture shall be on a scale commensurate with the scope of ITS investment in the region. Provision should be made to include participation from the following agencies, as appropriate, in the development of the regional ITS architecture: Highway agencies; public safety agencies (e.g., police, fire, emergency/medical); transit operators; Federal lands agencies; State motor carrier agencies; and other operating agencies necessary to fully address regional ITS integration.
( b ) Any region that is currently implementing ITS projects shall have a regional ITS architecture by April 8, 2005.
( c ) All other regions not currently implementing ITS projects shall have a regional ITS architecture within four years of the first ITS project for that region advancing to final design.
( d ) The regional ITS architecture shall include, at a minimum, the following: ( 1 ) A description of the region;
( 2 ) Identification of participating agencies and other stakeholders;
( 3 ) An operational concept that identifies the roles and responsibilities of participating agencies and stakeholders in the operation and implementation of the systems included in the regional ITS architecture;
( 4 ) Any agreements (existing or new) required for operations, including at a minimum those affecting ITS project interoperability, utilization of ITS related standards, and the operation of the projects identified in the regional ITS architecture;
( 5 ) System functional requirements;
( 6 ) Interface requirements and information exchanges with planned and existing systems and subsystems (for example, subsystems and architecture flows as defined in the National ITS Architecture);
( 7 ) Identification of ITS standards supporting regional and national interoperability; and
( 8 ) The sequence of projects required for implementation.
( e ) Existing regional ITS architectures that meet all of the requirements of paragraph (d) of this section shall be considered to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section.
( f ) The agencies and other stakeholders participating in the development of the regional ITS architecture shall develop and implement procedures and responsibilities for maintaining it, as needs evolve within the region.
[66 FR 1453, Jan. 8, 2001, as amended at 66 FR 19856, Apr. 18, 2001]
,-1-/~/\ ~ 261 u - I'LOb

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

Transport Canada Richard Topham 3/3/20 I0 No Objections

613·952-4428

Bombardier Rohert Farinas 3/3/1 0 No Objections

Aerospace 514·855-5001

XSD417

Regional Airline Dave Lonerer 3/3/10 No Objections

Association 202·367-1252

lotlerer@raa.org
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 21 - SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


                              HEALTH-CHEM CORPORATION
                          LIST OF SUBSIDIARY CORPORATIONS


                                                      State or Country
      Name                                            of Incorporation

Transderm Laboratories Corporation                       Delaware
Aberdeen Research Corporation                            Delaware
Capco Delaware, Inc.                                     Delaware
HS Protective Fabrics Corporation                        Delaware
H.S. Development, Inc.                                   Delaware
Health-Chem Industries, Inc.                             Delaware
Health Med Corporation                                   Delaware
Hercon Environmental Corporation                         Delaware
Hercon Laboratories Corporation                          Delaware
Hercon Pharmaceutical Corporation                        Delaware
Herculite Products, Inc.                                 New York
Medallion Group, Inc.                                    Delaware
Pacific Combining Corporation                            California
Research Development Corporation                         Delaware
Springs Development Corporation                          Delaware
York Aerosol Corporation                                 Delaware
York Aerosol Delivery Systems Corporation                Delaware
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4719 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4719

   To amend the Federal share of the fishing safety standards grants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 17, 2019

 Mr. Golden (for himself and Mr. Young) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal share of the fishing safety standards grants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Funding Instruction for Safety, 
Health, and Security Avoids Fishing Emergencies Act'' or the ``FISH 
SAFE Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT OF FEDERAL SHARE OF THE FISHING SAFETY STANDARDS 
              GRANTS.

    (a) Amendment.--Section 4502 of title 46, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (i)(3), by striking ``50'' and inserting 
        ``75''; and
            (2) in subsection (j)(3), by striking ``50'' and inserting 
        ``75''.
    (b) Retroactive Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection 
(a) takes effect on the day after the date of enactment of the Frank 
LoBiondo Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2018 (Public Law 115-282).

SEC. 3. REIMBURSEMENT.

    Amounts appropriated to carry out section 4502 of title 46, United 
States Code, under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017 (Public 
Law 115-31), shall be available until not later than September 30, 
2020, in order for the Secretary of Health and Human Services to 
provide a reimbursement or supplement to a recipient of a grant under 
the Fishing Safety Training Grants Program under section 4502(i) of 
title 46, United States Code, or the Fishing Safety Research Grant 
Program under section 4502(j) of title 46, United States Code, in an 
amount that is equal to, for any non-Federal share provided by such 
grant recipient under such Program that is more than 25 percent, the 
amount of such excess non-Federal share expended or included in the 
approved budget by such grant recipient.

SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS AMENDMENTS.

    Section 4502 of title 46, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (i)(4), by striking ``2019'' and 
        inserting ``2021''; and
            (2) in subsection (j)(4), by striking ``2019'' and 
        inserting ``2021''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Milford C. Drake et al., Appellants, v Dale F. Fox et al., Respondents.

[823 NYS2d 743]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County (Larry M. Himelein, A.J.), entered August 15, 2005. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present— Hurlbutt, A.PJ, Scudder, Gorski, Centra and Green, JJ.
### §6452. Duties

The duties of the Task Force shall be—

(1) to coordinate, in cooperation with covered States, covered Native entities, Federal reef managers, covered reef managers, coral reef research centers designated under section 6411(b) of this title (as added by this division), and other nongovernmental and academic partners as appropriate, activities regarding the mapping, monitoring, research, conservation, mitigation, and restoration of coral reefs and coral reef ecosystems;

(2) to monitor and advise regarding implementation of the policy and Federal agency responsibilities set forth in—

(A) Executive Order 13089 (63 Fed. Reg. 32701; relating to coral reef protection); and

(B) the National Coral Reef Resilience Strategy;

(3) to work in coordination with the other members of the Task Force—

(A) to assess the United States role in international trade and protection of coral species;

(B) to encourage implementation of appropriate strategies and actions to promote conservation and sustainable use of coral reef resources worldwide; and

(C) to collaborate with international communities successful in managing coral reefs;

(4) to provide technical assistance for the development and implementation, as appropriate, of—

(A) the National Coral Reef Resilience Strategy; and

(B) coral reef action plans under section 6404 of this title; and

(5) to produce a report each year, for submission to the appropriate congressional committees and publication on the public website of the Task Force, highlighting the status of the coral reef resources of a covered State on a rotating basis, including—

(A) a summary of recent coral reef management and restoration activities undertaken in that State; and

(B) updated estimates of the direct and indirect economic activity supported by, and other benefits associated with, those coral reef resources.

(Pub. L. 117–263, div. J, title C, §10012, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3952.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This division, referred to in par. (1), is div. J of Pub. L. 117–263, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3930. For complete classification of div. J to the Code, see Tables.

Executive Order 13089, referred to in par. (2)(A), is Ex. Ord. No. 13089, June 11, 1998, 63 F.R. 32701, which is set out as a note under section 6401 of this title.

Section 6404 of this title, referred to in par. (4)(B), was in the original "section 205 of that Act" and was translated as meaning section 205 of title II of Pub. L. 106–562, known as the Coral Reef Conservation Act of 2000, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
#### § 217.1 Scope.

The Visa Waiver Program (VWP) described in this section is established pursuant to the provisions of section 217 of the Act.

[62 FR 10351, Mar. 6, 1997, as amended at 87 FR 18980, Apr. 1, 2022]
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EarthLink, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin M. Dotts, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to myknowledge that:

(1)          the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition  and results ofoperations of the Company.
| /s/  KEVIN M. DOTTS |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
|                          |
| Kevin M. Dotts                |
| Chief Financial Officer       |
| November 6, 2006              |

 

----
|   | 1. | I      am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Royal Energy      Resources, Inc. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Attached      to this certification is Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2010, a      periodic report (the “periodic report”) filed by the issuer with the      Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), which contains      condensed financial statements. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | I      hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  that |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | The      periodic report containing the condensed financial statements fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange      Act, and |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | The      information in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations      of the issuer for the periodspresented. |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| July      14, 2010 | /s/ Jacob Roth                   |
|--------------------|----------------------------------|
|               | Jacob      Roth                  |
|               | Chief      Executive Officer and |
|               | Chief      Financial Officer     |

----
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 92096 / June 3, 2021

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-19793

In the Matter of

Morgan Stanley Smith Barney 

LLC,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

FUND ADMINISTRATOR AND 

SETTING ADMINISTRATOR’S 

BOND AMOUNT

On May 12, 2020, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Administrative and Ceaseand-Desist Proceedings, Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 

Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Making Findings, and 

Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order (the “Order”)1 against Morgan

Stanley Smith Barney LLC (the “Respondent” or “MSSB”). In the Order, the Commission 

found that from at least October 2012 until June 2017, MSSB negligently provided incomplete 

and inaccurate information regarding the trade execution services provided by MSSB and the 

transaction-based execution costs incurred by clients in wrap fee program accounts, which was 

misleading to certain retail clients. This information was communicated through various means 

and indicated that MSSB executed most client trades and clients did not incur transaction-based 

charges. However, as MSSB was aware, some wrap managers directed most, and sometimes all, 

client trades to third-party broker-dealers for execution, which resulted in certain clients paying 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 88856 (May 12, 2020).
2

transaction-based charges that were not visible to them. Accordingly, certain MSSB clients were 

unaware that they regularly paid execution costs in addition to MSSB’s wrap fee and paid MSSB 

a wrap fee that included execution services rarely, if ever, rendered by MSSB. The Commission 

ordered the Respondent to pay a $5,000,000 civil money penalty to the Commission. The 

Commission also created a Fair Fund, pursuant to Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 

2002, so the penalty paid can be distributed to harmed investors (the “Fair Fund”).

The Fair Fund includes the $5,000,000.00 paid by the Respondent.

The Division of Enforcement now seeks the appointment of Analytics Consulting, LLC 

(“Analytics”) as the fund administrator and requests that the administrator’s bond be set at 

$5,000,000. Analytics is included in the Commission’s approved pool of administrators.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Analytics is appointed as the fund 

administrator, pursuant to Rule 1105(a) of the Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and 

Disgorgement Plans (“Commission’s Rules”),2 and shall obtain a bond in accordance with Rule 

1105(c) of the Commission’s Rules,3in the amount of $5,000,000.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.4

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

2

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1105(a).

3

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1105(c).

4

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(17).
# DASHBOARD

Q7

Highest % Positive Items

Select:

Q50

Q42

Q28

Q8

Securities and Exchange Commission

Highest % Negative Items

Select:

Q33

Q23

Q67

Q24

Q22

When needed I am willing to put in the extra effort to get a job done.

In the last six months, my supervisor has talked with me about my performance.

My supervisor supports my need to balance work and other life issues.

How would you rate the overall quality of work done by your work unit?

I am constantly looking for ways to do my job better.

Pay raises depend on how well employees perform their jobs.

In my work unit, steps are taken to deal with a poor performer who cannot or will not improve.

In my work unit, differences in performance are recognized in a meaningful way.

How satisfied are you with your opportunity to get a better job in your organization?

Promotions in my work unit are based on merit.

 Engagement Index Score 

# DASHBOARD_DEMOGRAPHICS

Securities and Exchange Commission

# DASHBOARD_TRENDING

My work unit is able to recruit people with the right skills.

Securities and Exchange Commission

Q55

Q15

Q41

Employees have a feeling of personal empowerment with respect to work processes.

My performance appraisal is a fair reflection of my performance.

I believe the results of this survey will be used to make my agency a better place to work.

Q19

Q30

In my most recent performance appraisal, I understood what I had to do to be rated at different performance levels.

Supervisors work well with employees of different backgrounds.

Select:

Select:

My organization has prepared employees for potential security threats.

Q21

Q36

Largest Increases in Percent Positive since 2016

Largest Decreases in Percent Positive since 2016

items increased since 2016

items decreased since 2016

Percentage Point Change

Percentage Point Change

# CORE SURVEY

# WORK LIFE-TELEWORK

# DEMOGRAPHICS

# TREND CORE SURVEY

# TREND WORK LIFE-TELEWORK

# ASI

# image1.jpg

# image2.png

# image3.png

# image4.png

# image5.png

# image6.png

# image7.png

# image8.png