alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      32.**
**2**

**SECTION      1350 CERTIFICATION**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   /s/                Allen A. Spizzo                                              |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Allen                A. Spizzo                                                              |
| Vice                President and Chief Financial Officer March                7, 2007 |
IB 

Union Calendar No. 280 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4779 

[Report No. 116–351] 

To extend the Undertaking Spam, Spyware, And Fraud Enforcement With 

Enforcers beyond Borders Act of 2006, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 22, 2019 

Mrs. RODGERS of Washington (for herself, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, and Mr. 

BUCSHON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

DECEMBER 16, 2019 

Additional sponsors: Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. GIANFORTE, Mr. JOYCE of 

Pennsylvania, and Ms. BLUNT ROCHESTER

DECEMBER 16, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4779 RH

A BILL 

To extend the Undertaking Spam, Spyware, And Fraud Enforcement With Enforcers beyond Borders Act of 2006, 

and for other purposes. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 4779 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE U.S. SAFE WEB ACT OF 2006. 

4 Section 13 of the U.S. SAFE WEB Act of 2006 

5 (Public Law 109–455; 15 U.S.C. 44 note) is amended by 

6 striking ‘‘September 30, 2020’’ and inserting ‘‘September 

7 30, 2027’’. 

8 SEC. 2. REPORT. 

9 Not later than 3 years after the date of the enact10 ment of this Act, the Federal Trade Commission shall 

11 transmit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of 

12 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Com13 merce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report 

14 describing its use of and experience with the authority 

15 granted by the U.S. SAFE WEB Act of 2006 (Public Law 

16 109–455) and the amendments made by such Act. The 

17 report shall include— 

18 (1) the number of cross-border complaints re19 ceived and acted upon by the Commission; 

20 (2) identification of the foreign agencies with 

21 which the Commission has cooperated and the re22 sults of such cooperation, including any foreign 

23 agency enforcement action or lack thereof; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
4 

•HR 4779 RH

1 (3) a description of Commission litigation 

2 brought in foreign courts and the results of such liti3 gation; and 

4 (4) any recommendations for legislation that 

5 may advance the mission of the Commission in car6 rying out the U.S. SAFE WEB Act of 2006 and the 

7 amendments made by such Act. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 280 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4779 

[Report No. 116–351] 

A BILL 

To extend the Undertaking Spam, Spyware, And 

ders Act of 2006, and for other purposes. Fraud Enforcement With Enforcers beyond BorDECEMBER 16, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications.
Title: [Hi-Grouse Project cultural  resource].   | Amendment         
SuDocs No. A 13.92:H 53/3
Item  No. 0080-F (Online)
Sustem No. 000999706
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

 
 
 
Last updated:  September 24,  2016  Page Name:  http://permanent.fdlp.gov/
  |
|--|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### §459a–7. Availability of appropriations

Any funds appropriated to the Department of the Interior for the acquisition of non-Federal lands within areas of the National Park System shall after August 6, 1956, be available for the acquisition of non-Federal lands within the Cape Hatteras National Seashore Recreational Area, and the appropriation of funds for the acquisition of such lands is authorized.

(Aug. 6, 1956, ch. 988, §2, 70 Stat. 1066.)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8

                            Option to Ownership Plan
                              dated August 23, 2000



                                       75
<PAGE>   2
                                   ABLEST INC.

     Option-to-Ownership Plan

         1.       This Option-to-Ownership Plan (the "Plan") has been adopted by
the Board of Directors of Ablest Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
effective October 9, 2000.

         2.       The persons eligible to participate in the Plan are those
employees of the Company listed on the attached Exhibit A (the "Employees") who
hold options for common stock of the Company ("Options").

         3.       Pursuant to the Plan, each Employee may surrender all (but not
less than all) of his or her Options by no later than December 31, 2000, in
return for the opportunity to purchase common stock of the Company on the terms
and conditions set forth in the Plan.

         4.       The number of shares of common stock that each Employee may
purchase pursuant to the Plan shall be determined as follows: the value of the
options surrendered by such Employee as determined by the Black-Scholes method
and as indicated on the attached Exhibit A, divided by the fair market value of
a share of common stock of the Company as of the date of adoption of the Plan
(i.e., $4.25 per share).

         5.       Each Employee participating in the Plan will execute a
promissory note in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit B (the
"Note") in connection with the sale of the shares to such Employee.

         6.       The shares may not be sold or transferred by the Employee
until the Note is satisfied in accordance with the Plan. Each Employee will
execute a pledge agreement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit
C (the "Pledge Agreement") to secure satisfaction of the Note. The Company will
hold the certificate for the shares of each Employee until such Employee
satisfies his or her Note. Each certificate for shares shall bear a legend
referring to the foregoing restrictions.

         7.       The Company intends to forgive an Employee's Note if and when
such Employee completes one year of service as an employee of the Company, in
which he or she performs his or her job consistent with past performance. Upon
the forgiveness of a Note, the Pledge Agreement will be terminated and the
certificate for the shares such Employee has purchased will be delivered to him
or her.

         8.       If an Employee becomes disabled or dies before the end of the
first year after issuance of the shares to him or her, the Note will
automatically be forgiven and the shares and certificate therefor delivered to
such Employee's estate or him or her, as the case may be.

         9.       The total number of shares that may be issued pursuant to the
Plan is 55,314.


                                       76
<TABLE> <S> <C>


 <ARTICLE>                     5
 <LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
 </LEGEND>
 <CIK>                         0001102065
 <NAME>                        3045 Corporation

 <S>                             <C>
 <PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
 <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-30-2000
 <PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-1-1999
 <PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-29-2000
 <CASH>                                         638
 <SECURITIES>                                   0
 <RECEIVABLES>                                  0
 <ALLOWANCES>                                   0
 <INVENTORY>                                    0
 <CURRENT-ASSETS>                               638
 <PP&E>                                         0
 <DEPRECIATION>                                 0
 <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 638
 <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          16,967
 <BONDS>                                        0
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
 <PREFERRED>                                    0
 <COMMON>                                       5,450
 <OTHER-SE>                                    (21,779)
 <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   638
 <SALES>                                        0
 <TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
 <CGS>                                          0
 <TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
 <OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (993)
 <LOSS-PROVISION>                              (993)
 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
 <INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
 <INCOME-TAX>                                   0
 <INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (993)
 <DISCONTINUED>                                 0
 <EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
 <CHANGES>                                      0
 <NET-INCOME>                                  (993)
 <EPS-BASIC>                                   (.01)
 <EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.01)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7288

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WADEROY C.M. SENIOR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-74, CA-98-731-3)

Submitted: November 18, 1999 Decided: November 24, 1999

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Waderoy C.M. Senior, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Waderoy C.M. Senior seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Senior, Nos. CR-95-74;

CA-98-731-3 (E.D. Va. July 27, 1999). We also note that Senior’s

§ 2255 motion was untimely. See Brown v. Angelone, 150 F.3d 370,

375-76 (4th Cir. 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
#### Hattie Greenberg, Appellant, v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, Respondent.

Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
### §2205. Regulations for implementation of provisions

The Secretary is authorized to prescribe such regulations as the Secretary determines necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 95–334, title IV, §405, Aug. 4, 1978, 92 Stat. 434; Pub. L. 115–334, title II, §2403(a)(2)(A), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4571.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–334 substituted "The Secretary is" for "The Secretary of Agriculture is".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1978, see section 406 of Pub. L. 95–334, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out oft he changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

replacement) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost 

Do not include on- (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet 

condition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Inspection 27.7 417 

' 

. 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fl eet: S981 ,827 

Costs covered under warranty (ilknown) $ 

On-Condition Costs: G 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and closeup) 

Re pa ir of BS 328 

fram e; hours do not 

include a ccess and 

close-up, since 25.0 

these would be 

concurrent with the 

above inspection 
Modification ofBS 

360 frame; hours do 

not include access 

and close-up, since 

these would be 

concurrent with the 

4.4 

above inspection; 

hours are 4.45 - this 

template will not 

allow display of 

more than one 

decimal place 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain any thing in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? .G 

YES* 0 NO~ 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? G 

YES*0 NO~ 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. ~ 

YESD NO~ 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? @ 

YES*0 NO~ 

*Explanation:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 84407 / October 11, 2018

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-16017

In the Matter of

LINKBROKERS DERIVATIVES, 

LLC

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT 

OF FUND ADMINISTRATOR FEES, 

AND APPROVAL OF FUTURE FEES 

AND EXPENSES

On August 15, 2016, pursuant to Rule 1103 of the Securities and Exchange 

Commission’s (“Commission”) Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 

17 C.F.R. § 201.1103, the Commission issued a Notice of Proposed Plan of 

Distribution and Opportunity for Comment (“Notice”).1The Plan of Distribution 

(“Plan”) was approved on November 4, 2016.2 

The Plan provides for the payment of the Fund Administrator’s fees and 

expenses. In accordance with Rule 1105(d) of the Rules, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1105(d), the 

Fund Administrator has submitted invoices for services rendered from December 

2016 through July 2018, totaling $125,357.75 to Commission staff. The Commission 

staff has reviewed the Fund Administrator’s invoices, confirmed that the services have 

been provided, and finds the fees and expenses of $125,357.75 to be reasonable and in 

accordance with the Plan. The Commission staff has requested that the Commission 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 78577 (Aug. 15, 2016).

2

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 79248 (Nov. 4, 2016).
2

authorize the payment of the Fund Administrator’s invoiced fees and expenses of 

$125,357.75 from the Distribution Fund. 

Additionally, to expedite and streamline the process for future payments, the 

Commission staff has requested that the Commission authorize the Office of Financial 

Management (“OFM”), at the direction of the Assistant Director of the Office of 

Distributions, to pay the Fund Administrator’s future fees and expenses, so long as the 

total amount paid to the Fund Administrator, including the invoice to be paid, does not 

exceed the total amount of approved cost proposal submitted by the Fund 

Administrator.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

A. Pursuant to Rule 1105(d) of the Rules, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1105(d):

1. the Commission shall pay the Fund Administrator’s outstanding 

fees and expenses of $125,357.75 from the Distribution Fund; 

and 

2. OFM is authorized to pay, at the direction of the Assistant 

Director of the Office of Distributions, any future fees and 

expenses of the Fund Administrator, so long as the total amount 

paid to the Fund Administrator, including the invoice to be paid, 

does not exceed the total amount of the approved cost proposal 

submitted by the Fund Administrator. 

By the Commission. 

Brent J. Fields 

Secretary
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Elecsys Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended April 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and as of the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge;

 
|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|                                 |   |   |                                                                                      |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:   July 24, 2006 |   |   | /s/ Todd A. Daniels                                                                       |
|                                 |   |   | Todd A. Daniels

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

 

**[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to and will be retained by Elecsys Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]**
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 16

- 00431

- CR

Crystal B. WILLIAMS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR2757C

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED July 26, 2017.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
Exhibit 3.1

                    Amendments to the By-Laws of the Company

   1.)  Pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors, the By-Laws of
   the Company were amended by changing the third sentence of Section 2.05 to
   read as follows:

        "In lieu of closing the stock transfer books, the Board of
        Directors may fix in advance a date as the record date for any
        such determination of shareholders, such date in any case to be
        not more than seventy days and, in case of a meeting of
        shareholders, not less than ten days prior to the date on which
        the particular action, requiring such determination of
        shareholders, is to be taken."

   2.)  Pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors, the By-Laws of
   the Company were amended by changing the second sentence of the first
   paragraph of Section 3.01 to read as follows:

        "The number of directors of the corporation shall be six."
September 10 , 201 4

**MEMORANDUM From:**  Mary

Johnson EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243 - 01) **To:** Docket Number EPA - HQ - OAR - 20 13 - 0 60 2 **Subject:** Meeting with Portland General Electric held on September 4, 2014 Attendees : EPA: Peter Tsirigotis , OAR/OAQPS Robert Wayland , OAR/O AQPS Nick Hutson, OAR/OAQPS Andrew Bouchard, OAR/OAQPS Kevin Culligan , OAR/OAQPS , by phone Lisa Conner, OAR/OAQPS, by phone Portland General Electric : Brian Spak Sunny Radcliffe , by

phone Elysia Treanor , by

phone Jimmy L indsay , by

phone Steve Schue , by

phone Aaron Rodehorst , by

phone Reuben Plantico (outside consultant) , by phone Valerie West (outside consultant) , by phone Discussion : A general discussion was held regarding Portland General Electric’s comments on the EPA’s June 18, 201 4, proposal to regulate GHG emissions from existing electric utility generating units .