alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          81,454
<SECURITIES>                                    12,116
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,513
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (958)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               254,505
<PP&E>                                          12,884
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,938)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 275,527
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,417
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            32
<OTHER-SE>                                     270,559
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   275,527
<SALES>                                         34,404
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,404
<CGS>                                            9,219
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,830
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,007
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,252)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       231
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,483)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,483)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.88)


</TABLE>
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-93,799-01

EX P ARTE ORLANDO MARTINEZ , Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 13-CRD- 01-A IN THE 229 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM DUV AL COUNTY

Per curiam . Y E A R Y , J. fi led a concurring opin ion, w hich S L A U G H T E R , J. joined. O R D E R Applicant was convicted of one count of ag g ravated sexual assault, one count of indece ncy with a child and one count of continuous sexual assault of a child. He was sentenc ed to twenty

seven y ear s in two counts and twenty y ear s’ i m p ri s o nment in one count. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to thi s Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. The district cler

k proper ly forwa

rded this application to thi s C ourt under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedur e 73.4(b)( 5). Howeve r, the habea s rec ord indicates that the trial court has set a hear ing in this cause . I t appea rs that the trial court is still g ather ing information in this case , and the application was forwa

rded befor e the trial court made finding s of fac t and conclusions of law. Werema

nd this application to the trial court to complete its evidentiar y investigation and make finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law. The trial court shall make findings of fac t and conclusio n s o f l aw within ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: J une 8 , 2022 t h Do not publish
# •

•

• CITY OF INTERNATIONAL FALLS

April26, 2012 Mr. Dennis 

### J. DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviation Analysis- U.S. DOT 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE Washington, D.C. 20590 Dear MrDeVany: 600 FOURTH STREET INTERNATIONAL FALLS, MN 56649 Telephone**218/283~9484** FAX 218/283w3590
OFFICEOFMAYOR 

# c Shawn Mason

## ~s,-;~()~9-**~3ot/**

•.;,) Thank you again for taking the time to meet with our delegation when we were in Washingtcm last month. As we discussed, without commercial air setvice, ourcommunity and ourregion would suffer significant economic decline. Oursummertourism industry is the main support ofourmany small resorts and other businesses that work with them. They depend on the airport to bring in their customers. OurColdWeather Test industry relies on conunercial air service to move goods and people in and out ofthe airportwbased test center. We benefit from the trade ofour Canadian neighbors who cross the border to do business and who providenearly halfofour annual enplanements. Because ofthe extreme distances to othercommercial airports, it is not practical or realistic to assume ourlocal business climate could continue as is, let alone improve, ifour own commercial service is discontinued. We are pleased that the order which selects Great Lakes Airlines as ourEAS carrier has now been signed. We pledge to work closely with you, Delta, and Great Lakes to assure a smooth transition. It is in all ofour interests that Great Lakes successfully operate commercial service to our airport. However, until wehave experience with Great Lakes Airlines, we will continue to have concerns, particularly regarding schedule and summer capacity. We are asking for your assistance to assure that Great Lakes Airlines keeps the commitments they have made to us. We have good support for our airport among ourcongressional delegation which includes representatives of both parties and webelieve that ourparticularized experience will help infonn the national debate onthe EAS program going forward especially ifwe can hold our community up as an example ofhow EAS is supposed to work. T hnks again for your work to help keep our airport operating successfully.

cc. 

### ···? I 

### v 

# /$

# ~/~
Senator

### Amy Klobuchar SenatorAI Franken Representative Chip Cravaack Governor Mark Dayton Doug Voss, Great Lakes Airlines
Tonto National Forest
Supervisor's Office

i
_ | UTM Zone 12 NAD83 y
| Netde Hot Springs Quadtande 9 9.54 0,2 0.3 0.4 J easeaecosues
Vile CT) soutien vow tycatcher crtcat Haat
Order entered August 23, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00236

- CR

OTIS GARDNER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Ca use No. F10

- 56220

- Q



### O RDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant

has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any

other reason.

 The trial court shall first de termine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute this appeal, it shall make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute th e appeal, it shall next determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not indigent, it shall determ ine whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay in filing the repo rter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can

be filed.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a supplemental record, containing the written

findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY

DAYS of the date of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. It shall be

reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is received,

whichever is earlier.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
!"#$"



!"#$"%&'

()

!'*+,-././,0

!1)*-



		

2	&0
3

	

		






	 !
"#$

	
		
%	&'$())*))

		&	
		&+&$



		,		&
		

-	&	&	

.
/01
	,2
3)4 # 4#

 #$	&



,5,5	&		

		



++6725&
8	
	&



,5,5	&	
-	-	&

	'$())*))*

7	
	&

,5,5	&		&
1&	&


$

	
$	
		&		&
9	*

	:    ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

	+		01
	<

5	
1	:;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

=
1*/
 >+0?@)A#

0/-
$B**

)@C*/
9*$+	)

,&$>4A

6& D)@#4(D33))


	


May 15 2017 /s/ Keith L. Phillips

May 16 2017

Case 16-32929-KLP Doc 35 Filed 05/16/17 Entered 05/16/17 11:10:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
71
	&:

  EE=
1*/
     

=
1*/
 >+0?@)A#

0/-
$B**

)@C*/
9*$+	)

,&$>4A

6& D)@#4(D33))


	


+2
	

EE
=*0	


=*0	$&	
46
	





7
		&		&


&


	*

EE=
1*/



	


Case 16-32929-KLP Doc 35 Filed 05/16/17 Entered 05/16/17 11:10:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3


	
	

0/-
$B**

)@C*/
9*$+	)

,&$>4A




	

E6

	+	$,*	

@A)%,$+	D(

F$>4)G)




	

B
0%GD)DD

7
9$6HA()GD)DD


1>*B
1

@4D@6&
0
,

B-&	$>443


=*0	

&	
46
	

B*
*0%D3

,&$>4D

Case 16-32929-KLP Doc 35 Filed 05/16/17 Entered 05/16/17 11:10:44 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
### §698e. Authorization of appropriations for Big Thicket Preserve

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of sections 698 to 698e of this title, but not to exceed $63,812,000 for the acquisition of lands and interests in lands and not to exceed $7,000,000 for development. Effective October 1, 1984, there is authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for the acquisition of the visitor contact and administrative site referred to in subsection (c) of section 698 of this title. Effective upon July 1, 1993, there is authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of subsections (c) and (d) of section 698 of this title.

(Pub. L. 93–439, §6, Oct. 11, 1974, 88 Stat. 1257; Pub. L. 98–489, §1(b), Oct. 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 2267; Pub. L. 103–46, §2(d), July 1, 1993, 107 Stat. 231.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1993—Pub. L. 103–46 inserted at end "Effective upon July 1, 1993, there is authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of subsections (c) and (d) of section 698 of this title."

1984—Pub. L. 98–489 authorized appropriations for acquisition of a visitor contact and administrative site.
### §9551. Definitions

In this subchapter:

#### (1) Appropriate congressional committees

The term "appropriate congressional committees" means—

(A) the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate; and

(B) the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives.

#### (2) Eligible entity

The term "eligible entity" means—

(A) a minority-serving institution; or

(B) a consortium of institutions of higher education that is led by a minority-serving institution.

#### (3) MBDA Rural Business Center

The term "MBDA Rural Business Center" means an MBDA Business Center that provides technical business assistance to minority business enterprises located in rural areas.

#### (4) MBDA Rural Business Center agreement

The term "MBDA Rural Business Center agreement" means an MBDA Business Center agreement that establishes the terms by which the recipient of the Federal assistance award that is the subject of the agreement shall operate an MBDA Rural Business Center.

#### (5) Minority-serving institution

The term "minority-serving institution" means an institution described in any of paragraphs (1) through (7) of section 1067q(a) of title 20.

#### (6) Rural area

The term "rural area" has the meaning given the term in section 1991(a) of title 7.

#### (7) Rural minority business enterprise

The term "rural minority business enterprise" means a minority business enterprise located in a rural area.

(Pub. L. 117–58, div. K, title III, §100301, Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1458.)
#### § 34.102 Peer review procedures.

The OJJDP peer review process is contained in an OJJDP “Peer Review Guideline,” developed in consultation with the Directors and other appropriate officials of the National Science Foundation and the National Institute of Mental Health. In addition to specifying substantive and procedural matters related to the peer review process, the “Guideline” addresses such issues as standards of conduct, conflict of interest, compensation of peer reviewers, etc. The “Guideline” describes a process that evolves in accordance with experience and opportunities to effect improvements. The peer review process for all part C—National Programs assistance awards subject to this regulation will be conducted in a manner consistent with this subpart as implemented in the “Peer Review Guideline”.
#### Jacob A. Wood *v.*Ephraim Hildreth.

*Veildict—not disturbed where evidence is conflicting.*Where the evidence is conflicting and two juries have found the same verdict, the judgment will not be reversed, especially where it does not appear from the record that justice has not been done.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of McHenry county; the Hon. Theodore D. Murphy, Judge, presiding.

Mr. A. B. Coon, for the appellant.

' Messrs. Slavih & Smith, for the appellee.

Mr. Justice Scott

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This suit was brought by appellant against appellee before a justice of the peace. A trial before a jury in that court resulted in a verdict for appellee, and from the judgment rendered thereon he prosecuted an appeal to the circuit court, where the cause was again tried by a jury, with a like result. We are now asked to reverse the judgment for the sole reason, the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. This we must decline to do.

The controversy is in regard to the price of a washing machine. Appellant claims he made an absolute sale of the machine to appellee through his agent, DeGrraw.- Appellee's *526theory is, it was only a conditional sale. Evidence was offered by appellee tending to prove the machine was utterly worthless. It had been warranted to be a good machine. After it had been tested it was returned to appellant’s shop, but after-wards sent back to appellee’s house during his absence, and without his knowledge or consent.

The testimony on all the points at issue between the parties is contradictory in the extreme; so much so that we do not feel at liberty to disturb the verdict, and especially after the questions have been passed upon by two juries with a like result. They had a better opportunity to judge of the credibility of the several witnesses than we can have, and we can not undertake to reverse their decision in a case where the evidence is so conflicting. Aside from this consideration, we can not say, upon the whole evidence in the record, that justice has not been done.

The judgment must be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
1 

Projected civilian and commercial UAS sales in the US 

Millions UAS units 

By 2020 we expect significant growth in UAS across all major segments 

1.6

1.9

4.4

0 0

0 1.2 0

1.2

+29.6% p.a. 

2020

7.1 

0 0.2 

0 

16

2.5 

0 

0.3 

2015

1.6 

0 0 

Mapping Wildlife 

Insurance News/media 

Industrial inspection 

Emergency response 

E-commerce 

Agriculture 

Aerial photography 

Hobbyist 

▪ Average of two ranged projections from 1.3-1.6M

2015 sales with growth of 10-30%

Drivers 

▪ 165k photographers in the US; 20% adoption, 1.5

UAS per photographer; 4% growth

▪ 5.7M farms, 40% adoption; 1 UAS/farm

▪ Expert estimates of Amazon fleet of 450,000 by 2020

to meet 85% delivery target; 10% growth rate

▪ 17,985 police depts. and 30,052 fire depts. in the US;

70% adoption rate; 1.5/dept.

▪ 1K oil rigs in US; 90% adoption; 1.5 UAS/rig

▪ 729K construction companies; 50% adoption;

1.5/company

▪ 51 DOTs; 100% adoption; 5 UAS/DOT

▪ 360K adjusters; 50% adoption; 10% growth

▪ 11K helicopters; 5% news and media

▪ 2.4B acres of land; 1000 acres/UAS daily; 4

nationwide mappings annually

Hobbyist 

Aerial 

photography 

Agriculture 

E-commerce 

Emergency 

response 

Industrial 

inspection 

Insurance 

Mapping 

News/media 

▪ 59 National Parks in the US; 90% adoption rate; 5

UAS/national park`

Wildlife 

Reduced unconstrained case sales by 50% 

in base case due to BVLOS restrictions

Included in 

base case
# Official Journal C 394/2017

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 394 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6022 November 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 394

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6022 November 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 394/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 394/01

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.24

                            STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT

         THIS STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT (the "Agreement"), made this 19th day of
June, 1998, is entered into by FurnitureSite, Inc., a Delaware corporation with
its principal place of business at 100 Beacon Street, Worcester, MA 01608-2210
(the "Purchaser"), and Steven Rothschild, residing at 4 Lantern Lane, Worcester,
MA 01609 (the "Seller").

         1. The Seller hereby sells to the Purchaser and the Purchaser hereby
purchases from the Seller 7,500 shares (the "Shares") of common stock, no par
value, of Empire Furniture Warehouse, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation
("Empire"). The aggregate purchase price for the Shares shall be $250,000.

         2. The Seller represents and warrants to the Purchaser that the Shares
represent all the outstanding shares of capital stock of Empire and that they
have been duly authorized, are validly issued and are fully paid and
non-assessable.

         3. The Seller hereby acknowledges receipt of the purchase price for the
Shares and the Purchaser hereby acknowledges receipt of a certificate evidencing
the Shares.

         4. The Seller agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Purchaser from
and against all claims, damages, losses, liabilities, costs and expenses
(including reasonable attorneys' fees) incurred by the Purchaser resulting from
any breach of the representation and warranty made by the Seller in Section 2
above; PROVIDED that the aggregate liability for indemnification shall not
exceed $250,000. The indemnity provided in this Agreement shall be the sole and
exclusive legal remedy of the Purchaser for any breach of the representation and
warranty for any claim, liability or obligation arising out of this Agreement
and the acquisition of the Shares, whether in tort, contract or otherwise. The
representation, warranty and indemnity shall expire on the first anniversary of
the date of this Agreement.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly executed by the
parties hereto as of the date first written above.

SELLER                                  FURNITURESITE, INC.
                                        (PURCHASER)


/s/ Steven Rothschild                   By: /s/ Steven Rothschild
-------------------------------             -------------------------------
Steven Rothschild                           Steven Rothschild,
                                            President
### §7641. Anti-poaching programs

#### (a) Wildlife law enforcement professional training and coordination activities

The Secretary of State and the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, in collaboration with the heads of other relevant United States agencies and nongovernmental partners where appropriate, may provide assistance to focus countries to carry out the recommendations made in the strategic plan required by section 7631(a)(2) of this title, among other goals, to improve the effectiveness of wildlife law enforcement in regions and countries that have demonstrated capacity, willingness, and need for assistance.

#### (b) Sense of Congress regarding security assistance to counter wildlife trafficking and poaching in Africa

It is the sense of Congress that the United States should continue to provide defense articles (not including significant military equipment), defense services, and related training to appropriate security forces of countries of Africa for the purposes of countering wildlife trafficking and poaching.

(Pub. L. 114–231, title IV, §401, Oct. 7, 2016, 130 Stat. 954.)
### §7807. Cooperation in carrying out the Convention

#### (a) Federal and State agencies; private institutions and organizations

The Secretary may cooperate with agencies of the United States Government, any public or private institutions or organizations within the United States or abroad, and, through the Secretary of State, the duly authorized officials of the government of any party to the South Pacific Fishery Resources Convention, in carrying out responsibilities under this chapter.

#### (b) Scientific and other programs; facilities and personnel

All Federal agencies may, upon the request of the Secretary, cooperate in the conduct of scientific and other programs and to furnish facilities and personnel for the purpose of assisting the Commission in carrying out its duties under the South Pacific Fishery Resources Convention.

#### (c) Sanctioned fishing operations and biological experiments

Nothing in this chapter, or in the laws or regulations of any State, prevents the Secretary or the Commission from—

(1) conducting or authorizing the conduct of fishing operations and biological experiments at any time for purposes of scientific investigation; or

(2) discharging any other duties prescribed by the South Pacific Fishery Resources Convention.

#### (d) State jurisdiction not affected

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to diminish or to increase the jurisdiction of any State in the territorial sea of the United States.

(Pub. L. 114–327, title II, §207, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1992.)