alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§631a to 631q. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–702, title IV, §408(a), Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1098

Sections were from act Feb. 26, 1944, ch. 65, §§1–17, 58 Stat. 100.

Section 631e amended by act Sept. 27, 1950, ch. 1056, 64 Stat. 1071.

Sections related to protection of fur seals and other fur-bearing animals as follows:

631a, Definitions,

631b, Pelagic sealing, sealing, or sea otter hunting in certain waters of North Pacific prohibited; use of ports of United States; importing illegally taken skins,

631c, Natives permitted to carry on pelagic sealing or sea otter hunting,

631d, Killing of seals on Pribilof Islands, other islands, and shores of waters under United States jurisdiction; permission to designated Fish and Wildlife Service officers and employees and Alaskan natives; pelagic sealing in emergencies,

631e, Sale of seal or sea otter skins; deposit of proceeds,

631f, Pribilof Islands a special reservation; landing on islands unlawful; penalties,

631g, Employment of Pribilof Islands native in killing seals and curing skins,

631h, Depots for and transportation of provisions from mainland to Pribilof Islands; care of natives,

631i, Investigations as to seal life on the Pribilof Islands,

631j, Persons authorized to enforce provisions of seal fisheries law; powers of arrest, search, and seizure; execution of warrants; forfeiture,

631k, Punishment for violation of law; forfeiture,

631l, Duties of collectors of customs regarding importation of skins of fur seal and see otter,

631m, Seizure of persons or vessels outside of jurisdiction of signatory powers; procedure,

631n, Guard or patrol of waters; composition,

631o, Receipt and disposal of skins by United States,

631p, Killing, capturing, etc., certain fur-bearing animals for scientific purposes,

631q, Secretary's powers and duties; employment of personnel.

Subject matter is covered by section 1151 et seq. of this title.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 68264 / November 19, 2012

Administrative Proceeding

File No. 3-14641

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

 :

CHARLES L. RIZZO AND :

GINA M. HORNBOGEN : Order Appointing

: Tax Administrator

:

Respondents. :

____________________________________:

By order dated January 21, 2011, the Commission issued the “Omnibus Order 

Directing the Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that 

Establish Distribution Funds” (“Omnibus Order”), Rel. No. 34-63749, authorizing the 

Secretary to issue orders during calendar years 2011-2012 appointing, upon request by 

the Commission staff, Damasco and Associates, LLP (“Damasco”), a certified public 

accounting firm located in Half Moon Bay, California, as tax administrator (“Tax 

Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund may incur 

tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department of 

the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On November 16, 2012, the Commission staff requested, pursuant to the 

Omnibus Order, the appointment of Damasco as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in 

the above-referenced proceeding. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Damasco, pursuant to and in accordance with the Omnibus 

Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced 

proceeding. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Elizabeth M. Murphy

Secretary
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2




     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of HMI Industries Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K (the "Report") for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Julie A. McGraw,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                          /s/ Julie A. McGraw
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          Julie A. McGraw
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                          February 20, 2004
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

 RICHMOND DIVISION 

In Re: OLIVER LAWRENCE, 

Debtor(s) Case No. 17-30339-KRH 

Chapter 13 

 MOTION TO DISMISS 

NOW COMES the Debtor(s), OLIVER LAWRENCE, by counsel, pursuant to 11 

U.S. C. Sec. 1307(b) and requests dismissal of this Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Petition. This 

case has not been converted to Chapter 13 from any other Chapter. 

OLIVER LAWRENCE 

 By /s/ Aubrey F. Hammond, Jr. 

 Aubrey F. Hammond, Jr., Attorney for Debtor 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that a true copy of the foregoing Motion to Dismiss has been sent via the 

courts electronic filing system to the U.S. Trustee, Carl M. Bates, standing Chapter 13 

Trustee and all necessary parties in interest on March 6, 2017.

 /s/ Aubrey F. Hammond, Jr. 

Aubrey F. Hammond, Jr., VSB# 28256 

16 North 8th Street, First Floor 

Richmond, VA 23219 

(804)644-2546 

Case 17-30339-KRH Doc 17 Filed 03/06/17 Entered 03/06/17 08:30:05 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

RICHMOND DIVISION 

 In Re: OLIVER LAWRENCE, 

Debtor(s) Case No. 17-30339-KRH 

Chapter 13 

PROPOSED ORDER TO DISMISS 

UPON consideration of the motion of OLIVER LAWRENCE, Debtor(s), pursuant 

to 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1307(b) to enter an Order dismissing this case and closing the estate as 

soon as practicable, and 

IT APPEARING that this Chapter 13 case has not been converted to Chapter 13 from 

another chapter of the Bankruptcy Code, it is therefore, 

ORDERED that this Chapter 13 case is hereby dismissed and this case shall be 

closed by the Clerk of this Court as soon as practicable; and it is further 

ORDERED that the dismissal of this case shall revest the property of the estate in 

the entity in which such property was vested immediately before the commencement of the 

case. The trustee need not file a final report in this case unless property or money was 

administered. 

If the Debtor has been making payments by payroll deduction, the employer as set 

forth in the order for payroll assignment, shall cease any payroll deductions for the benefit of 

the Chapter 13 trustee. 

Date:_____________________ By___________________________ 

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge 

Dated Docketed 

_________________________ 

I ask for this: 

Case 17-30339-KRH Doc 17 Filed 03/06/17 Entered 03/06/17 08:30:05 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
/s/ Aubrey F. Hammond, Jr. 

Counsel for Debtor 

Aubrey F. Hammond, Jr., VSB # 28256 

16 North 8th Street, First Floor 

Richmond, VA 23219 

(804) 644-2546 

CERTIFICATE OF ENDORSEMENT 

I hereby certify that this Order has been endorsed by all necessary parties. 

/s/Aubrey F. Hammond, Jr. 

Copies to: 

Carl M. Bates 

Chapter 13 Trustee 

P.O. Box 1819 

Richmond, VA 23218-0000 

Office of the U.S. Trustee 

701 East Broad Street 

Suite 4304 

Richmond, VA 23219-1885 

Oliver Lawrence 

12384 Mechumps Creek Lane 

Ashland, VA 23005 

Case 17-30339-KRH Doc 17 Filed 03/06/17 Entered 03/06/17 08:30:05 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 92948 / September 13, 2021

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension of trading 

in the securities of the following issuer, commencing at 9:30 a.m. EDT on September 14, 2021 

and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 27, 2021:

 Aeon Global Health Corp. (AGHC)

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of the foregoing company due 

to a lack of current and accurate information about the company because it has not filed certain 

periodic reports with the Commission. This order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).

The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by this company.

Brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11, at 

the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered relating to the securities 

of the subject company unless and until the broker or dealer has strictly complied with all of the 

provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by the rule, it 

should refrain from entering quotations relating to the securities of this company that has been 

subject to a trading suspension until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is 

certain that all of its provisions have been met. Any broker or dealer with questions regarding

the rule should contact the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, DC 

at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of the rule,

the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action. 

If any broker, dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, they 

should immediately communicate it to the Delinquent Filings Branch of the Division of 

Enforcement at (202) 551-5466, or by e-mail at DelinquentFilings@sec.gov.
አምራች ሠራተኞች

እራስዎን እና የስራ ባልደረቦችዎን ከኮቪድ-19 ለመጠበቅ ከስራ እና ከስራ ውጭማድረግ የሚችሏቸው ነገሮች

CS 316954-I 06/29/2020

ከታመሙበቤት ውስጥይቆዩ።

መከታተል ያለብዎት ምልክቶች:

• ሳል

• የትንፍሽ መቆራረጥ ወይም የመተንፈስ ችግር

• ትኩሳት

• ብርድ ብርድ ማለት

• የጡንቻ ህመም

• የጉሮሮ መቁሰል

• ከዚህ በፊት ያልታየ የመቅመስ ወይም የማሽተት ስሜት ማጣት

በሚታመሙበት ጊዜ ከሌሎች ጋር ከመገናኘት ይቆጠቡ

• በተቻለዎት መጠን፣ በአንድ የተወሰነ ክፍል ውስጥ እና በቤትዎ ውስጥ ካሉ ሌሎች ሰዎች ርቀው

ይቆዩ።

• መች ወደ ስራ እንደሚመለሱ ከሐኪምዎ እና ከተቆጣጣሪዎ ጋር ይወያዩ።

ተደራሽ የሆነ እትም፦https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/guidance-manufacturing-workers-employers.html

cdc.gov/coronavirus

6 ጫማ

(2 ሜትር)

በተቻለዎት መጠን በሥራ ቦታዎ እና በማህበረሰብዎ ውስጥ ካሉ ሌሎች ሰዎች ቢያንስ 6 ጫማ (2 የጎልማሳ

ክንዶች ርዝመት ይህል) ይራቁ

• በውይይት ወቅት፣ የእቃ ሳጥን በያዙ ክፍሎች፣ መተላለፊይ መንገዶች ወይም ኮሪደሮች ውስጥ፣ እና

ወደ ሥራ ቦታዎ ሲገቡ ወይም ሲወጡ ቢያንስ 6 ጫማ ርቀው ይቆዩ።

• ከስራ ባልደረባዎ ጋር ምግብም ሆነ መጠጥ አይጋሩ።

• መሣሪያዎች በመደበኛነት ማጽዳት እና ከብክለት መንፃትአለባቸው፣ በተለይም የሥራ ቦታዎችን

ሲቀይሩ ወይም ወደ አዲስ የመሣሪያ ስብስብ ሲንቀሳቀሱ

• ከተቻለ፣ መኪና በጋራ አይጠቀሙ

በስራ ቦታዎ ወይም ህዝብ በሚሰበሰብበት ቦታ ሲሆኑ አፍንጫዎን እና አፍዎን የሚሸፍን የፊት መሸፈኛ

ያድርጉ።

• የፊት መሸፈኛዎን ከፊትዎ ጉንጮች ጋር ጠበቅ ባድረግ ነገርግን ምቾት ባለዉ ሁኔታ ያድርጉ።

• የፊት ሽፋንዎን ሲያስወግዱ፣ አይኖችዎን፣ አፍንጫዎን፣ ወይም አፍዎን ላለመንካት ይሞክሩ፣ እና

ወዲያውኑ እጅችዎን ይታጠቡ

• ከተጠቀሙ በኋላ የፊት መሸፈኛዎን ይጠቡ ወይም በሌላ ይተኩ።

• እርጥብ ወይም ቆሻሻ በሚሆንበት ጊዜ የፊት መሸፈኛዎን በሌላይተኩ።

• ለመደበኛ ሥራዎ የሚያስፈልገውን የግል መከላከያ መሳሪያ (PPE) ማድረግዎን ይቀጥሉ።
cdc.gov/coronavirus

አይኖትን፣ አፍንጫዎትን ወይም አፍዎትን አይንኩ፤

• ባልታጠበ እጅ

• ጓንት አድርገዉ

• የፊት ሽፋንዎን ወይም የደህንነት መነጽሮን ሲያስተካክሉ ወይም ሲያወልቁ

በሳሙና እና በውሃ ቢያንስ ለ 20 ሰከንዶች ያህል አዘውትረው እጅዎን ይታጠቡ ወይም በውስጡ ቢያንስ

60% የሚሆን አልኮል ያለው የእጅ ማፅጃ ፈሳሽ ይጠቀሙ፡

• ከስራ ፈረቃ እና ዕረፍት በፊትም ሆነ በኋላ

• አፍንጫዎን ከነኩ፣ ካሳልዎ ወይም ካስነጠሱ በኋላ

• መጸዳጃ ቤቱን ከተጠቀሙ በኋላ

• ከመመገብዎ በፊት

• ምግብ ከማዘጋጀትዎ በፊትም ሆነ በኋላ

• የፊት ሽፋንዎን ካደረጉ፣ ከነኩ ወይም ካወለቁ በኋላ

ሳልዎን እና ማስነጠስዎን ይሸፍኑ

• አፍዎን እና አፍንጫዎን በሶፍት ወይም በክርንዎ ይሸፍኑ።

• ጥቅም ላይ የዋሉ ሶፍቶችን የቆሻሻ ማጠራቀሚያ ውስጥ ይጣሉ።

• ካስነጠሱ ወይም ካሳሉ በኋላ ወዲያውኑ እጆችዎን ይታጠቡ ወይም ቢያንስ 60% አልኮሆል የያዘ እጅ- ማፅጃ ይጠቀሙ
### §460rrr–5. Administration of Natural Area

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall administer the Federal land in the Natural Area—

(1) in accordance with—

(A) the laws (including regulations) applicable to public land; and

(B) the management plan; and

(2) in a manner that provides for—

(A) the conservation, restoration, and protection of the natural, historic, scientific, scenic, wildlife, and recreational resources of the Natural Area;

(B) the continued use of the Natural Area for purposes of education, scientific study, and limited public recreation in a manner that does not substantially impair the purposes for which the Natural Area is established;

(C) the protection of the wildlife habitat of the Natural Area;

(D) a prohibition on the construction of water storage facilities in the Natural Area; and

(E) the reduction in the use of or removal of roads in the Natural Area and, to the maximum extent practicable, the reduction in or prohibition against the use of motorized vehicles in the Natural Area (including the removal of roads and a prohibition against motorized use on Federal land in the area on the western side of the Rio Grande River from Lobatos Bridge south to the New Mexico State line).

#### (b) Changes in streamflow

The Secretary is encouraged to negotiate with the State of Colorado, the Rio Grande Water Conservation District, and affected water users in the State to determine if changes in the streamflow that are beneficial to the Natural Area may be accommodated.

#### (c) Private land

The management plan prepared under section 460rrr–4(b)(2)(A) of this title shall apply to private land in the Natural Area only to the extent that the private landowner agrees in writing to be bound by the management plan.

#### (d) Withdrawal

Subject to valid existing rights, all Federal land in the Natural Area is withdrawn from—

(1) all forms of entry, appropriation, or disposal under the public land laws;

(2) location, entry, and patent under the mining laws; and

(3) disposition under the mineral leasing laws (including geothermal leasing laws).

#### (e) Acquisition of land

#### (1) In general

The Secretary may acquire from willing sellers by purchase, exchange, or donation land or an interest in land in the Natural Area.

#### (2) Administration

Any land or interest in land acquired under paragraph (1) shall be administered in accordance with the management plan and this subchapter.

#### (f) Applicable law

Section 1276(d)(1) of this title shall not apply to the Natural Area.

(Pub. L. 109–337, §7, Oct. 12, 2006, 120 Stat. 1780.)
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
 
                     THE HERTZ CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
   COMPUTATION OF CONSOLIDATED RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES (UNAUDITED)
                    (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS EXCEPT RATIOS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                              ----------------------------------------------------
                                                1997       1996       1995       1994       1993
                                              --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
<S>                                           <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Income before income taxes..................  $343,270   $256,569   $172,344   $162,831   $102,450
Interest expense............................   316,038    309,249    323,871    284,438    256,718
Portion of rent estimated to represent the
  interest factor...........................    72,752     69,188     75,874     88,219     76,298
                                              --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
Earnings before income taxes and fixed
  charges...................................  $732,060   $635,006   $572,089   $535,488   $435,466
                                              ========   ========   ========   ========   ========
Interest expense (including capitalized
  interest).................................  $316,536   $309,843   $325,021   $284,855   $256,866
Portion of rent estimated to represent the
  interest factor...........................    72,752     69,188     75,874     88,219     76,298
                                              --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
Fixed charges...............................  $389,288   $379,031   $400,895   $373,074   $333,164
                                              ========   ========   ========   ========   ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges..........       1.9        1.7        1.4        1.4        1.3
                                              ========   ========   ========   ========   ========
</TABLE>
**Exhibit99**

** **

**UNDERTAKINGS**

** **

For the purposes of complying with the amendments tothe rules governing Form S-8 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “SecuritiesAct”), the Registrant hereby undertakes as follows, which undertaking shall beincorporated by reference into Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8Nos. 333-04273 (filed May 22, 1996); 333-175155 (filed December 2, 1996);333-41447 (filed December 4, 1997); 333-92531 (filed December 10, 1999);333-36252 (filed May 4, 2000); 333-04273 (filed July 21, 2000); 333-72906(filed November 7, 2001); 333-115922 (filed May 27, 2004); and 333-122019(filed January 13, 2005):

 

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arisingunder the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controllingpersons of the Registrant, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinionof the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against publicpolicy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore,unenforceable.  In the event that a claimfor indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by theRegistrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controllingperson of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit orproceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person inconnection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless inthe opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controllingprecedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whethersuch indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in theSecurities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

 

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SANTOS NOEL BENITEZ,

Petitioner,

v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 14

- 73614 Agency No. A094

- 457

- 760

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted July 7, 2016 Pasadena, California Before: FERNANDEZ, CLIFTON, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Santos Noel Benitez , a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions

for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA ) dismissing his

a ppeal from an immigration judge’ s decision denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to

reopen
. S ingh v. Holder , 771 F.3d 647, 650 (9th Cir. 2014). We grant the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3. 

# FILED

AUG 16 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

petition for review and remand for further proceedings

. Petitioner moved to reopen so that he could pursue an I

- 601A provisional waiver of inadmissibility pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 212.7 . W ith respect to an
individual like Benitez who has been in removal proceedings, such a waiver is available only if the agency ha s administratively closed proceedings, instead of entering a removal order

. 8 C.F.R. § § 212.7(e)(3)(ii), (4)(v); see also Provisional Unlawful Presence Waivers of Inadmissibility for Certain Immediate Relatives, 78

Fed. Reg. 536, 545 (Jan. 3, 2013).

The BIA correctly noted that Petitioner was ordered removed , rendering him presently ineligible for the waiver

. The BIA abuse d its discretion in denying Benitez’s motion to reopen , however, because it appears not to have consider ed

whether Benitez was entitled to the requested relief as a matter of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a); Singh , 771 F.3d at 653 ( holding that the Bo ard’s denial of a motion to reopen on jurisdictional grounds was legal error , and thus an abuse of
discretion, because it had authority to reopen under § 1003.2(a)) ; see also Franco

Rosendo v. Gonzales , 454 F.3d 965, 967

- 6 8 (9th Cir. 2006) (remanding to the BIA for further proceedings on the basis of the BIA’s failure to weigh favorable and

unfavorable factors and to consider the petitioner’s evidence in determining3

whether reopening is appropriate)

. We therefore grant the petition and remand for further proceedings.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED and REMANDED
.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charlie McPHERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-4977.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2002.

Decided May 22, 2002.

John D. Bryson, Wyatt, Early, Harris & Wheeler, L.L.P., High Point, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Lisa B. Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Charlie McPherson was resentenced on his guilty plea to felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(g)(1) (West 2000). He appeals that sentence, claiming the district court erred in declining to depart based upon an over-representation of criminal history, and asserting that the district court mistakenly believed that it lacked authority to depart. *938We find McPherson’s claim that the district court erred in refusing to grant his motion for a downward departure to be without merit. 18 U.S.C.A. § 3742 (West 2000); *United States v. Bayerle,*898 F.2d 28, 31 (4th Cir.1990). A fair and complete reading of the record reveals that the district court fully considered its authority to depart, and factually determined that departure in McPherson’s case was not warranted. The district court is not required to do more. *Bayerle,*898 F.2d at 31. Accordingly, we affirm McPherson’s sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*