alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Greg Coulter [mailto:greg.coulter405@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 6:20 PM To: Brian Coffey; Robert Carmichael Subject: Fwd: Input for Steel Price Sensitivity Tool Brian and Rob, I trust you understood our reasoning behind this request on the price sensitivity range for core materials. If you have questions please let us know. Also, if you have questions on any of the transfor mer stuff (Liquid Filled) we would be happy to help.

Thanks Greg Coulter

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Gaytan Cavazos, Carl os (GE Energy, Non-GE) < Carlos.Gaytan@ge.com > Date: Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:18 PM Subject: Input for Steel Price Sensitivity Tool To: Richard Parker < richardparkerdc@gmail.com >, Wes Patterson < wes.patterson@us.abb.com >, Aaron.Meyers@cooperindustries.com , adelaski@standardsasap.org , ahofmann@publicpower.org , amarantan@navigant.com , artrosenfeld@gmail.com , august.esch@gmail.com , BermanEconomics@gmail.com , brian.coffey@navigant.com , bruce.r.hirsch@bge.com , bsmith@federalpacific.com , cabolduc@lbl.gov , Caitlin.Johnson@navigant.com , carlosgsiqueiros@eaton.com , chad.kennedy@us.schneider-electric.com , charlied@uss.org , chuck.simmons@pgnmail.com , Cla_Silcox@nema.org , cstephens@neea.org , Daniel.Cohen@hq.doe.gov , dave.millure@metglas.com , DYoung@energy-solution.com , eduardorobles@eaton.com , Eric.Petersen@aksteel.com , gbf1@pge.com , gjrosenquist@lbl.gov , greg.coulter405@gmail.com , James.Lass@cleco.com , Jennifer.Tiedeman@hq.doe.com , Jeremiah.Freeman@ee.doe.gov , jerry.corkran@cooperindustries.com , jerry.schoen@aksteel.com , jhodge@howard-ind.com , Jim.creevy@nema.org , Jim.Raba@ee.doe.gov , jmauer@standardsasap.org , Joh_Caskey@nema.org , john.cymbalsky@ee.doe.gov , jrossetti@mlgw.org , kcoughlin@lbl.gov , kwinder@mleainc.com , maheshsampat@bellsouth.net , mark.stoering@xcelenergy.com , matthew.nardotti@navigant.com , mhyland@appanet.org , mrivest@navigant.com , mwaltner@nrdc.org , Paul.Ryan@hitmet.com , phil@pjharter.com , phopkinson@hvolt.com , pkumar@publicpower.org , Raymond.Polinski@atimetals.com , rgreeson@federalpacific.com , rick.anderson@faypwc.com , robert.saint@nreca.coop , rroy@nrdc.org , ScottB@lvmetals.com , snadel@aceee.org , srosenstock@eei.org , tballo@earthjustice.org , Teckman@nwcouncil.org , thomas.patzner@us.schneider-electric.com , vijay.tendulkar@onyxpower.com , zhimei.luo@navigant.com

Richard Parker, DOE Representatives, and MV Working Group Members,Prolec GE is recommending that the proposed steel pr ice sensitivity tool’s price range be expanded from the current proposal of +/-25% to at least +/-50%. Our analysis of the range of price changes in core materials for Distribution Transformer price parity at increased draft Efficiency Levels (dEL’s) shows a much greater range of possible core material price vari ation. A summary of our findings is in the attached file.

Thank you for your consideration of this recommendation.

Sincerely,

Carlos Gaytan

Prolec GE

-- Greg Coulter
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 98425 / September 18, 2023

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-19541

In the Matter of

FCA US LLC and Fiat Chrysler 

Automobiles N.V.,

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER DIRECTING 

DISBURSEMENT OF FAIR FUND

On May 19, 2022, the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority, 

published a Notice of Proposed Plan of Distribution and Opportunity for Comment (“Notice”),1

pursuant to Rule 1103 of the Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans 

(“Commission’s Rules”);2and simultaneously posted the Proposed Plan of Distribution (the 

“Proposed Plan”). The Notice advised interested persons that they could obtain a copy of the 

Proposed Plan from the Commission’s public website or by submitting a written request to 

Sondra Panahi, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, 801 Brickell Ave, Suite 

1950, Miami, FL 33131. 

The Notice also advised that all persons desiring to comment on the Proposed Plan could 

submit their comments, in writing, within 30 days of the Notice. The Commission received no 

comments on the Proposed Plan during the comment period. On July 12, 2022, the Division of 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 94948 (May 19, 2022).

2

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1103.
2

Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority, issued an order approving the Proposed Plan,3and 

posted the approved Plan of Distribution (the “Plan”).

The Plan provides for the distribution of the Fair Fund, plus accumulated interest, less 

taxes, fees, and expenses, to the harmed investors according to the methodology set forth in the 

Plan. In accordance with the Plan, the Claims Bar Date has passed and all timely submitted 

claims have been processed by the Fund Administrator. All investors whose claims have been 

denied, in whole or in part, have been notified and provided the opportunity to cure.

Pursuant to the Plan, the Fund Administrator has submitted a payment file to Commission 

staff with a reasonable assurances letter as to the completeness and accuracy of the information 

contained therein. The Commission staff has reviewed and accepted the payment file and 

requests, pursuant to Rule 1101(b)(6) of the Commission’s Rules4, that the Commission 

authorize the transfer of $39,552,652.62 from the Fair Fund to the Fair Fund’s escrow account at 

The Huntington National Bank, N.A. for distribution by the Fund Administrator to the eligible 

claimant in accordance with the Plan. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, that Commission staff shall transfer 

$39,552,652.62 from the Fair Fund to the Fair Fund’s escrow account at The Huntington 

National Bank, N.A., and the Fund Administrator shall distribute such monies to the eligible 

claimant in accordance with the Plan. 

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.5

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

3

 See Order Approving Plan of Distribution, Exchange Act Rel. No. 95261 (July 12, 2022).

4 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(b)(6)

5

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(v).
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 99753 / March 18, 2024

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-20387

In the Matter of the Application of 

TITAN SECURITIES AND BRAD C. BROOKS

For Review of Disciplinary Action Taken by

FINRA

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ISSUE DECISION

The Commission has determined, in its discretion, that it is appropriate to extend by 

90 days the period within which the decision in this matter may be issued. Accordingly, IT IS 

ORDERED that such period be, and hereby is, extended to June 17, 2024.

1

By the Commission.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary

1

June 16, 2024, is a Sunday.
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 324 

Designating September 29, 2019, as ‘‘National Urban Wildlife Refuge Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2019 

Mr. GARDNER (for himself and Mr. BENNET) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

OCTOBER 16, 2019 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 29, 2019, as ‘‘National Urban 

Wildlife Refuge Day’’. 

Whereas over 80 percent of people in the United States live 

in or near cities, which typically have limited opportunities for residents to access nature and experience outdoor 

recreation; 

Whereas the National Wildlife Refuge System under the 

United States Fish and Wildlife Service manages 567 national wildlife refuges that constitute a national network 

of land and water managed for the conservation of fish, 

wildlife, and plants in the United States; 

Whereas national wildlife refuges provide opportunities for 

people to discover and appreciate nature; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

SRES 324 ATS 

Whereas there is a refuge located within a 1-hour drive of 

every metropolitan area in the United States; 

Whereas the Urban Wildlife Conservation Program under the 

United States Fish and Wildlife Service— 

(1) focuses on introducing people living in densely 

populated areas to the more than 100 national wildlife 

refuges near urban areas; and 

(2) promotes wildlife conservation and the enjoyment 

of hunting, fishing, and other wildlife-dependent recreational activities close to where people live; 

Whereas the Urban Wildlife Conservation Program focuses 

on public-private partnerships— 

(1) to improve wildlife conservation; and 

(2) to promote access to recreation on and off national wildlife refuges, including recreational activities 

such as hunting and fishing; and 

Whereas by exploring community-centered approaches to address local needs, engaging the next generation of anglers 

and hunters, and providing infrastructure and safe access, the Urban Wildlife Conservation Program helps 

local organizations, cities, and towns across the United 

States engage in conservation activities: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates September 29, 2019, as ‘‘Na3 tional Urban Wildlife Refuge Day’’; 

4 (2) encourages the United States Fish and 

5 Wildlife Service to increase access to outdoor rec6 reational opportunities for urban communities; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

SRES 324 ATS 

1 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

2 to visit and experience the more than 100 urban na3 tional wildlife refuges of the United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

May 12, 2021

In the Matter of

PLEDGE PETROLEUM CORP.,

File No. 500-1

ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF

TRADING

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of PLEDGE PETROLEUM 

CORP. (“PROP1”) (CIK No. 1434110), a delinquent Delaware corporation located in Houston, 

Texas with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Securities Exchange 

Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") Section 12(g) because it is delinquent in its periodic filings with 

the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period 

ended June 30, 2019. On October 27, 2020, the Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance 

(“Corporation Finance”) sent a delinquency letter to PROP requesting compliance with its 

periodic filing requirements, which was delivered. As of April 1, 2021, the common stock of 

PROP was quoted on OTC Link operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. (formerly “Pink Sheets”) 

(“OTC Link”), had six market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” exception of 

Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3). 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors 

require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is 

ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the 

 

1 The short form of each issuer’s name is also its stock symbol.
2

securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on May 

13, 2021, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 26, 2021.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
#### § 633.210 Termination of contract.

All contracts exceeding $2,500 shall contain suitable provisions for termination by the State, including the manner in which the termination will be effected and the basis for settlement. In addition, such contracts shall describe conditions under which the contract may be terminated for default as well as conditions where the contract may be terminated because of circumstances beyond the control of the contractor.
#### § 771.101 Purpose.

This part prescribes the policies and procedures of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 as amended (NEPA), and supplements the NEPA regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508 (CEQ regulations). Together these regulations set forth all FHWA, FRA, FTA, and U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) requirements under NEPA for the processing of highway, public transportation, and railroad actions. This part also sets forth procedures to comply with 23 U.S.C. 109(h), 128, 138, 139, 325, 326, and 327; 49 U.S.C. 303; 49 U.S.C. 24201; and 5323(q); Public Law 112-141, 126 Stat. 405, section 1301 as applicable; and Public Law 114-94, 129 Stat. 1312, section 1304.
§ 540.61 Authorization. ( a ) A news media representative who desires to make a visit or conduct an interview at an institution must make application in writing to the Warden, indicating that he or she is familiar with the rules and regulations of the institution and agrees to comply with them.
( b ) As a condition of authorizing interviews and making facilities available to conduct an interview, the news media representative shall recognize a professional responsibility to make reasonable attempts to verify any allegations regarding an inmate, staff member or institution.
( c ) A representative of the news media is requested to provide the Bureau of Prisons an opportunity to respond to any allegation, which might be published or broadcast prior to distribution.
( d ) A representative of the news media shall collect information only from the primary source. A representative of the news media may not obtain and use personal information from one inmate about another inmate who refuses to be interviewed.
( e ) The Warden may be contacted concerning discussions or comments regarding applicability of any rule or order.
( f ) Failure to adhere to the standards of conduct set forth by this rule for the news media representative constitutes grounds for denying that news media representative, or the news organization which he or she represents, permission to conduct an interview.
( g ) Any questions as to the meaning or application of this subpart are resolved by the Director of the Bureau of Prisons.
### §460vv–15. Grazing

Subject to such limitations, conditions, or regulations as he may prescribe, the Secretary of Agriculture shall permit grazing on lands within the Ouachita National Forest, Le Flore County, Oklahoma.

(Pub. L. 100–499, §17, Oct. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 2499.)
#### § 1214.3 Certain spouses and children of lawful permanent residents; aliens in proceedings; V visas.

An alien who is already in immigration proceedings and believes that he or she may have become eligible to apply for V nonimmigrant status should request before the immigration judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals, as appropriate, that the proceedings be administratively closed (or before the Board that a previously-filed motion for reopening or reconsideration be indefinitely continued) in order to allow the alien to pursue an application for V nonimmigrant status with the Service. If the alien appears eligible for V nonimmigrant status, the immigration judge or the Board, whichever has jurisdiction, shall administratively close the proceeding or continue the motion indefinitely. In the event that the Service finds an alien eligible for V nonimmigrant status, the Service can adjudicate the change of status under this section. In the event that the Service finds an alien ineligible for V nonimmigrant status, the Service shall recommence proceedings by filing a motion to re-calendar.
#### Leon B. Kwartler v. Rebecca I. Kwartler.

Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.'
§ 8.20 Ruling on petition for expedited release in an administrative forfeiture proceeding. ( a ) If a final administrative determination of the case, without regard to the provisions of this section, is made within 21 days of the seizure, the seizing agency need take no further action under this section on a petition for expedited release received pursuant to § 8.19(a).
( b ) If no such final administrative determination is made within 21 days of the seizure, the following procedure shall apply. The seizing agency shall, within 20 days after the receipt of the petition for expedited release, determine whether the petition filed by the owner has established the factors listed in § 8.19(c) and: ( 1 ) If the seizing agency determines that those factors have been established, it shall terminate the administrative proceedings and return the property to the owner (or in the case of a commercial fishing industry vessel for which a summons has been issued shall dismiss the summons), except where it is evidence of a violation of law; or
( 2 ) If the seizing agency determines that those factors have not been established, the agency shall proceed with the administrative forfeiture.
Editorial Note on Part 645
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 645 appear at 65 FR 70311, Nov. 22, 2000.

§ 645.103 Applicability. ( a ) The provisions of this regulation apply to reimbursement claimed by a State transportation department (STD) for costs incurred under an approved and properly executed transportation department (TD)/utility agreement and for payment of costs incurred under all Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)/utility agreements.
( b ) Procedures on the accommodation of utilities are set forth in 23 CFR part 645, subpart B, Accommodation of Utilities.
( c ) When the lines or facilities to be relocated or adjusted due to highway construction are privately owned, located on the owner's land, devoted exclusively to private use and not directly or indirectly serving the public, the provisions of the FHWA's right-of-way procedures in 23 CFR 710.203, apply. When applicable, under the foregoing conditions, the provisions of this regulation may be used as a guide to establish a cost-to-cure.
( d ) The FHWA's reimbursement to the STD will be governed by State law (or State regulation) or the provisions of this regulation, whichever is more restrictive. When State law or regulation differs from this regulation, a determination shall be made by the STD subject to the concurrence of the FHWA as to which standards will govern, and the record documented accordingly, for each relocation encountered.
( e ) For direct Federal projects, all references herein to the STD or TD are inapplicable, and it is intended that the FHWA be considered in the relative position of the STD or TD.
[50 FR 20345, May 15, 1985, as amended at 64 FR 71289, Dec. 21, 1999]
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00416-CV

City of Palmview

v.

Agua Special Utility District

On appeal from the

389th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-0667-18-H

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 7, 2019
§ 515.19 Organizational integration of asset management. ( a ) The purpose of this section is to describe how a State DOT may integrate asset management into its organizational mission, culture and capabilities at all levels. The activities described in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section are not requirements.
( b ) A State DOT should establish organizational strategic goals and include the goals in its organizational strategic implementation plans with an explanation as to how asset management will help it to achieve those goals.
( c ) A State DOT should conduct a periodic self-assessment of the agency's capabilities to conduct asset management, as well as its current efforts in implementing an asset management plan. The self-assessment should consider, at a minimum, the adequacy of the State DOT's strategic goals and policies with respect to asset management, whether asset management is considered in the agency's planning and programming of resources, including development of the STIP; whether the agency is implementing appropriate program delivery processes, such as consideration of alternative project delivery mechanisms, effective program management, and cost tracking and estimating; and whether the agency is implementing adequate data collection and analysis policies to support an effective asset management program.
( d ) Based on the results of the self-assessment, the State DOT should conduct a gap analysis to determine which areas of its asset management process require improvement. In conducting a gap analysis, the State DOT should: ( 1 ) Determine the level of organizational performance effort needed to achieve the objectives of asset management;
( 2 ) Determine the performance gaps between the existing level of performance effort and the needed level of performance effort; and
( 3 ) Develop strategies to close the identified organizational performance gaps and define the period of time over which the gap is to be closed.
§ 115.381 Medical and mental health screenings; history of sexual abuse. ( a ) If the screening pursuant to § 115.341 indicates that a resident has experienced prior sexual victimization, whether it occurred in an institutional setting or in the community, staff shall ensure that the resident is offered a follow-up meeting with a medical or mental health practitioner within 14 days of the intake screening.
( b ) If the screening pursuant to § 115.341 indicates that a resident has previously perpetrated sexual abuse, whether it occurred in an institutional setting or in the community, staff shall ensure that the resident is offered a follow-up meeting with a mental health practitioner within 14 days of the intake screening.
( c ) Any information related to sexual victimization or abusiveness that occurred in an institutional setting shall be strictly limited to medical and mental health practitioners and other staff, as necessary, to inform treatment plans and security and management decisions, including housing, bed, work, education, and program assignments, or as otherwise required by Federal, State, or local law.
( d ) Medical and mental health practitioners shall obtain informed consent from residents before reporting information about prior sexual victimization that did not occur in an institutional setting, unless the resident is under the age of 18.