alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

In re: )

)

 OLIVER TREIBER CARTER, JR. ) Case No. 16-10955-BFK

KAREN ELAINE CARTER ) Chapter 7

)

Debtors )

ORDER SETTING EXPEDITED HEARING

(Docket No. 16)

Upon consideration of the Debtors’ motion for an expedited hearing (Docket No.16) on 

their Motion to Extend the Automatic Stay (Docket No. 15), it is

ORDERED:

1. The motion for an expedited hearing is granted, and a hearing on the Motion to

Extend the Automatic Stay shall be held on Thursday, April 7, 2016, at 9:30 a.m. Counsel

for the Debtors shall file and serve a notice of the hearing by close of business on Monday,

March 28, 2016. Because of the shortened notice, the requirement of a written response to

oppose the motion is waived, and any opposition may be presented at the hearing.

2. The Clerk will mail a copy of this order, or give electronic notice of its entry, to the

parties listed below.

Date: _____________________ ___________________________________

Brian F. Kenney

Alexandria, Virginia United States Bankruptcy Judge

Copies to:

Brian Tucci, Esquire

Counsel for the Debtors

Janet M. Meiburger, Esquire

Chapter 7 Trustee

Mar 29 2016 /s/ Brian F. Kenney

Entered on docket: March 29, 2016

Case 16-10955-BFK Doc 19 Filed 03/29/16 Entered 03/29/16 16:08:10 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsElectric Arc and Electrochemical Surface Texturing TechnologiesSurface texturing of conductive materials can readily be accomplished by means of a moving electric arc which produces a plasma from the environmental gases as well as from the vaporized substrate and arc electrode materials. As the arc is forced to move across the substrate surface, a condensate from the plasma re-deposits an extremely rough surface which is intimately mixed and attached to the substrate material. The arc textured surfaces produce greatly enhanced thermal emittance and hold potential for use as high temperature radiator surfaces in space, as well as in systems which use radiative heat dissipation such as computer assisted tomography (CAT) scan systems. Electrochemical texturing of titanium alloys can be accomplished by using sodium chloride solutions along with ultrasonic agitation to produce a random distribution of craters on the surface. The crater size and density can be controlled to produce surface craters appropriately sized for direct bone in-growth of orthopaedic implants. Electric arc texturing and electrochemical texturing techniques, surface properties and potential applications will be presented.Document ID19980000589Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsBanks, Bruce A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Rutledge, Sharon K.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Snyder, Scott A.*(Ohio Aerospace Inst. Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1997Subject CategoryMetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-107508NAS 1.15:107508E-10810Meeting InformationMeeting: International Conference on Surface Modification TechnologiesLocation: ParisCountry: FranceStart Date: September 8, 1997End Date: September 10, 1997Sponsors:Society of Metallurgy and MaterialsFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-23-2CDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980000589.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


                     THE HERTZ CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                  COMPUTATION OF CONSOLIDATED RATIO OF EARNINGS
                          TO FIXED CHARGES (UNAUDITED)
                     (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS EXCEPT RATIOS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Years Ended December 31,
                                                --------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   2002          2001          2000            1999           1998
                                                --------      --------      ----------      ----------      --------
<S>                                             <C>           <C>           <C>             <C>             <C>
Income before income taxes ...............      $216,394      $  2,723      $  580,864      $  560,393      $465,392
Interest expense .........................       376,710       413,711         428,387         353,516       317,756
Portion of rent estimated to represent the
  interest factor ........................       115,879       116,393         104,886          90,463        78,435
                                                --------      --------      ----------      ----------      --------
Earnings before income taxes and fixed
  charges ................................      $708,983      $532,827      $1,114,137      $1,004,372      $861,583
                                                ========      ========      ==========      ==========      ========
Interest expense (including capitalized
  interest) ..............................      $377,852      $415,198      $  431,308      $  355,309      $318,967

Portion of rent estimated to represent the
  interest factor ........................       115,879       116,393         104,886          90,463        78,435
                                                --------      --------      ----------      ----------      --------
Fixed charges ............................      $493,731      $531,591      $  536,194      $  445,772      $397,402
                                                ========      ========      ==========      ==========      ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges .......           1.4           1.0             2.1             2.3           2.2
                                                ========      ========      ==========      ==========      ========
</TABLE>
ልጅህበወረርሽኙተጠቅቶበሚታመምበት ወቅት

እድሜያቸው ከአምስት ዓመት (5) በታች የሆኑ ህፃናት በበሽታው በይበልጥ የመጠቃት 

እድል አላቸው፡፡ በአስምና በስኳር በሽታ ለረጅም ጊዜ የተጠቁ ህፃናትም በወረርሽኙ 

ሲያዙ ችግራቸው የበረታ ይሆናል፡፡

ልጅህ ከአምስ ዓመት(5) እድሜ በታች ከሆነና ለረጅም ጊዜ በሚቆይ (እንደ አስምና 

ስኳር በሽታ) ተጠቂ ከሆነና የወረርሽኙ ምልክቶች ከታዩበት ስቃዩ እንደሚበረታበት 

ይታወቃል፡፡ 

ልጅህ ምርመራ ሊደረግለት ያስፈልግ እንደሆን ለማወቅ ሐኪምህን አማክረው፡፡

ብዙዎቹ ህፃናት ወደ ሐኪሙ ከመሄዳቸው በፊት ህመሙ ይለቃቸዋል፡፡ሌሎች ደግሞ 

የወረርሽኙ ስቃይ ሊበረታባቸው ይችላል፡፡ በማንኛውም የእድሜ እርከን የሚገኝ 

ህፃን የወረርሽኙ ምልክቶች ከታዩበት ወደ ሐኪም መሄድ አለበት፡፡

የፀረ-ቫይረስ መድሃኒቶች ህመሙ በተከሰተ በሁለት ቀናት (48 ሰዓታት) ቢወሰዱ 

ውጤታማ ይሆናሉ፡፡

ልጅህ ወደ ሆስፒታል ከተወሰደ ወይም በወረርሽኙ በመጠቃቱ ለበለጠ ህመም 

የሚዳረግ ከሆነ ሐኪሙ ከ48 ሰዓታት በኋላም ቢሆን የፀረ- ቫይረስ መድሂኒቱን 

ሊሰጠው ይችላል፡፡ 

CS 217340/2010 1

ኢንፍሎዌንዛ(ወረርሽኝ) ልጅህ በበሽታው በሚጠቃበት ወቅት

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2

የዩናይትድእስቴትስየጤናጥበቃና ሰብአዊ እርዳታአገልግሎቶች መምሪያ፡፡

የበሽታመከላከያናመቆጣጠሪያ ማእከል፡፡

ኢንፍሎዌንዛ(ወረርሽኝ) ልጅህ በበሽታው በሚጠቃበት ወቅት

ትኩሳት የሚከሰተው የሰውነት ሙቀት ከ1ዐዐ ዲግሪ ፋራናይት (37 ዲግሪ ሴንቲግሬድ) 

በላይ ወይም (እኩልሲሆንነው፡፡የቴርሞሜትር መሣሪያከሌለህ የልጅህን ፊት ዳብሰው፡፡ 

ልጅህ ከመካከኛው መጠን ያለፈ ትኩሳት ከታየበት፣ ፊቱ ከቀላ፣ የማላብና የመንዘፍዘፍ 

ወይም የማንቀጥቀጥ ስሜት ከታየበት ትኩሳት ሊኖርበት ይችላል ማለት ነው፡፡ 

ልጅህ ትኩሳት ከታየበት ትኩሳቱን ለመቀነስ የምንጠቀምባቸው መድሃኒቶች 

አሉ፡፡ አንዳንዶቹ በመድሃኒት መሸጫ ቤቶች ይገዛሉ፡፡ ያለአንዳች ጥያቄ መግዛት 

ትችላለህ፡፡ አንዳንዶቹ የሐኪም ትእዛዝ ይፈልጋሉ፡፡ ከሐኪሙ ጋር መነጋገር አለብህ 

የልጅህን እድሜ በመገንዘብ ሐኪሙ የሚያዘውን መድሃኒት ለመግዛት ሞክር፡

በመድሃኒት ቤቶች የሚሸጡት መድሃኒቶች ህፃናትን እንደሚያሽሏቸው የሚገመቱ 

ናቸው፡፡ ሐኪምን በማማከር መድሃኒቶቹ ለልጅህ ተገቢ መሆናቸውን አረጋግጥ፡

፡ ወረርሽኙ ለተጠቃው ልጅህ በምንም ዓይነት መንገድ እስኘሪን የተባለው 

መድሃኒት እንዳይሰጠው ተጠንቀቅ፡፡ 
3

የዩናይትድእስቴትስየጤናጥበቃና ሰብአዊ እርዳታአገልግሎቶች መምሪያ፡፡

የበሽታመከላከያናመቆጣጠሪያ ማእከል፡፡

ኢንፍሎዌንዛ(ወረርሽኝ) ልጅህ በበሽታው በሚጠቃበት ወቅት

ልጅህ በሚታመምበት ጊዜ በቂ እረፍትና ሰውነቱ የሚያስፈልገውን ፈሳሽ እንያገኝ 

ውሃና የተለያዩ ፈሳሽ (እንደ ውሃ፣ መረቅ፣ ፈሳሽ ተኪው ስፖርትስ የሚባለው መጠጥ፣ 

የልጆች ኤሌክተሮላይት መጠጦች፣ Pedialyte® የመሳሰሉ) መጠጠችን አቅርብለት፡፡

ትካሰቱ ከለቀቃቸው ከ24 ሰዓት በኋላ ህፃናቱ ወደ ትምህርት ቤት ሊሄዱ ይችላሉ፡፡ ትኩሳቱን ዝቅ የሚያደርግ መድሃኒት 

ሳይሰጣቸውም ቢሆን፡፡ 

የእክምና እርዳታ እንዲያገኝ ካልሆነ በስተቀር ትኩሳቱ እስኪለቀው ድረስ ልጅህን 

በቤት እንዲቆይ አድርግ፡፡ይህንንም በማድረግህ በሽታው እንዳይስፋፋ ያረዳል፡፡ 
4

የዩናይትድእስቴትስየጤናጥበቃና ሰብአዊ እርዳታአገልግሎቶች መምሪያ፡፡

የበሽታመከላከያናመቆጣጠሪያ ማእከል፡፡

ኢንፍሎዌንዛ(ወረርሽኝ) ልጅህ በበሽታው በሚጠቃበት ወቅት

ወረርሽኙ በቤትህ ለሚገኙ ሌሎች ሰዎችከመሰራጨት የምትከላከልበት መንገድ አለ፡፡ ይኸውም

ልጅህ በተለየ ክፍል እንዲተኛ በማድረግ ከሌሎች ጤናማ የቤተሰቡ አባላት 

ግንኙነቱ የተገደበ እንዲሆን ማድረግ፡፡

ከሌሎች ሰዎች ጋር እንዳይመገብና እንዳይጠጣ ማድረግ፡፡ አንድ ሰው 

ብቻ እንዲንከባከበው መመደብ፡፡ 

ቢቻል የሚንከባከበው ሰው ለወረርሽኙ የተጋለጠ እንዳይሆን ማድረግ፡፡በወረርሽኙ 

ከተጠቃ ከባድ ችግር ውስጥ ሊገባ የሚችል እንደ አስም ያለበት ሰው ወይም 

እርጉዝ ሴት ለዚህ የእንክብካቤ ስራ አይፈለጉም፡፡

ለበለጠ መረጃ የበሽታ መከላከያ ማእከልን በ8ዐዐ-ሲዲስ-ኢንፎ (232-4636) ቴሌፎን ወይም www.cdc.gov/flu. 

ድረ-ገጽ ተጠቀም፡፡
"s-J*

Clarence Leroy Dighton

TDCJ #01367261

815 12th St.

Huntsville Unit

Huntsville, Texas 77348

January 11, 2015

Re: Notice of denial of PDR

The Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals

P.O. Box 12308

Austin, Texas 78711

ol7 3-<2>g

Dear Sir or Madam:

I believe that on June 8, 2008 my PDR was either refused or denied.

However, my attorney never notified me of the denial or refusal.

I am now attempting to file a federal habeas corpus writ, and I will

have to argue equitable tolling. Will you provide me with a "white

card" or other proof of notification that states the person's name

and address that you notified of the denial or refusal of the PDR?

Thank you in advance for your cooperation

CC//FILE

Respectfully,

ULoJUA^jeJ oC /J(-<

Clarence Leroy Dighton

1 of 1

JAN 20 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk

.s
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Donato Rizzo, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Kings county *899affirmed. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.
### §368. Operation of bathhouse in connection with hotel

Nothing in sections 362 to 367 of this title shall be so construed as to prevent the stockholders of any hotel from operating a bathhouse in connection with such hotel as a part thereof.

(Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 533, §8, 26 Stat. 844.)
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 20, 2010

p1213 

# Order

December 20, 2010

141642

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141642 COA: 290283 Wayne CC: 07-012394-FC DWAYNE LAMONT GLOBE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 5, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
Case 16-71348-SCS Doc 3 Filed 04/18/16 Entered 04/18/16 11:08:14 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 15953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6645]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; Publicly Available Consumer Product 
Safety Information Database

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Consumer Product Safety Commission (Commission) is 
announcing that a collection of information entitled Publicly Available 
Consumer Product Safety Information Database has been approved by the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Glatz, Division of Policy and 
Planning, Office of Information Technology and Technology Services, 
Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
MD 20814; telephone: (301) 504-7671 or by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#28444f44495c52684b585b4b064f475e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ae6ede6ebfef0cae9faf9e9a4ede5fc">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of May 24, 2010, 75 
FR 29156, the agency announced that the proposed information collection 
had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 
3501-3520. A final rule was published in the Federal Register of 
December 9, 2010, 75 FR 76832. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, 
and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information 
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now 
approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 
3041-0146. The approval expires on January 31, 2014. A copy of the 
supporting statement for this information collection is available on 
the Internet at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-6645 Filed 3-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Hattie Bostwick, appellee, v. Dina Keller et al., Impleaded with William F. Vest et al., appellants.

Filed November 20, 1901.

No. 10,484.

1. Copy of Appraisement for Sale Must Be Filed With Clerk of District Court. A copy of an appraisement of land's made for the purpose, of judicial sale must be forthwith filed with the clerk of the district court of the proper county.

2. Silence of Becord: Presumption. When the record is silent as to filing- of a copy of the appraisement, it will be presumed that it was duly and regularly filed.

3. Appraisement: Actual View. A sale is not invalidated because the appraisement was not made upon actual view of the premises, when the appraisers are familiar with the property.

*816Appeal from the district court for Buffalo county. Heard below before Sullivan, J.

*Affirmed.*

*Hamer & Hamer,*for appellants.

*Warren Pratt, contra.*

Norval, O. J.

From an order of the district court confirming a sale of real estate made under a decree foreclosing a real estate mortgage, the defendants appeal.

It is urged that no copy of the appraisement was filed by the sheriff in the office of the clerk of the district court. The officer is required forthwith to file a copy of the appraisement, and prior to the publication of the notice of sale. *Kearney Land & Investment Co. v. Aspinwall,*45 Nebr., 601; *Burkett v. Clark,*46 Nebr., 466; *Walker v. Patch,*52 Nebr., 763; *First Nat. Bank of Broken Bow v. Hamer,*51 Nebr., 23; *Globe Loan & Trust Co. v. Wood,*58 Nebr., 395. Therefore, if it appears from the record before us that no copy of the appraisement was ever filed, the sale for that reason would have to be set aside. Unfortunately for the defendants, this record does not so show. It is true no transcript.of any copy of the copy of appraisement is to be found in the record, but that proves nothing. The transcript does not purport to be a full and complete copy of the records and files of the lower court. On the other hand, the return of the officer, which we find in the record, states that after the appraisement was made he forthwith deposited a copy thereof in the' office of the clerk of the district court of said county.. This is not overcome by the mere silence of the record upon the subject: The presumption is that the officer did his duty; especially is this true when his return shows he has done so.

That the appraisement was not made upon actual vieAv of the premises does not vitiate the sale. The statute does not require that the appraisers should be on the lands at *817the time they make the appraisement, although it is better that they view the premises, as ordinarily it would enable them the more intelligently to perform their duties, as the appraiser must be familiar Avith the premises.

The order complained of is

Affirmed.
#### James H. White and John R. Schermerhorn, Appellants, v. Percival L. Waters, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23


                                 ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
033-064299, 333-09667, 333-09669, 333-09671, and 333-09673 on Form S-8 of
Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. of our reports dated February 26, 1998, relating to
the balance sheets of Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and
1996, and the related statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997,
and relating to the financial statement schedule of Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.
for the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, which reports appear in
the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.

/s/  KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
Honolulu, Hawaii
March 25, 1998
§ 1215.7 Transfer of funds. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, if at any time in a fiscal year beginning after September 30, 1994, a State does not have in effect a law described in § 1215.4(a), the Secretary shall transfer 3 percent of the funds apportioned to the State for the succeeding fiscal year under 23 U.S.C. 104 (b)(1), (b)(2) and (b)(3) to the apportionment of the State under 23 U.S.C. 402.
( b ) For New Hampshire or Maine, except as provided in § 1215.4(c), if at any time in a fiscal year beginning after September 30, 1994, the State does not have in effect a law described in § 1215.4(a), the Secretary shall reserve 3 percent of the funds to be apportioned to the State for the succeeding fiscal year under 23 U.S.C. 104 (b)(1), (b)(2) and (b)(3) if the Secretary has not certified, in accordance with § 1215.4(d), that the State has achieved the applicable safety belt use rate.
( c ) If, at the end of a fiscal year in which the funds are reserved for New Hampshire or Maine under paragraph (b) of this section, the Secretary has not certified that the State achieved the applicable safety belt use rate, the Secretary shall transfer the funds reserved from the State to the apportionment of the State under 23 U.S.C. 402.
( d ) Any obligation limitation existing on transferred funds prior to the transfer will apply, proportionately, to those funds after transfer.
[61 FR 28749, June 6, 1996]
### §690c. Existence of easements, reservations, or exceptions as barring acquisition of lands

The existence of a right-of-way easement or other reservation or exception in respect of such area shall not be a bar to its acquisition (1) if the Secretary of the Interior determines that any such reservation or exception will in no manner interfere with the use of the area for the purposes of sections 690 to 690i of this title, or (2) if in the deed or other conveyance it is stipulated that any reservation or exception in respect of such area, in favor of the person from whom the United States receives title, shall be subject to regulations prescribed under authority of sections 690 to 690i of this title.

(Apr. 23, 1928, ch. 413, §4, 45 Stat. 449; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. II, §4(f), eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2731, 53 Stat. 1433.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 690i, included within the reference to sections 690 to 690i, was omitted from the Code.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Reorg. Plan No. II of 1939, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, transferred functions of Secretary of Agriculture relating to conservation of wildlife, game, and migratory birds to Secretary of the Interior.
### §470r. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 89–665, title II, §210, as added Pub. L. 94–422, title II, §201(9), Sept. 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 1322; amended Pub. L. 96–515, title III, §301(k), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2999, related to transmittal of legislative recommendations, testimony, or comments to any officer or agency of the United States prior to submission thereof to Congress. See section 304107 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
Editorial Note on Part 1003
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1003 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10350, Mar. 5, 2003.

§ 1003.27 Public access to hearings. All hearings, other than exclusion hearings, shall be open to the public except that: ( a ) Depending upon physical facilities, the Immigration Judge may place reasonable limitations upon the number in attendance at any one time with priority being given to the press over the general public;
( b ) For the purpose of protecting witnesses, parties, or the public interest, the Immigration Judge may limit attendance or hold a closed hearing.
( c ) In any proceeding before an Immigration Judge concerning an abused alien spouse, the hearing and the Record of Proceeding shall be closed to the public unless the abused spouse agrees that the hearing and the Record of Proceeding shall be open to the public. In any proceeding before an Immigration Judge concerning an abused alien child, the hearing and the Record of Proceeding shall be closed to the public.
( d ) Proceedings before an Immigration Judge shall be closed to the public if information subject to a protective order under § 1003.46, which has been filed under seal pursuant to § 1003.31(d), may be considered.
[52 FR 2936, Jan. 29, 1987. Redesignated and amended at 57 FR 11571, 11572, Apr. 6, 1992; 62 FR 10334, Mar. 6, 1997; 67 FR 36802, May 28, 2002]
### §5961. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 105–391, title IV, §412, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3515; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(3) [title I, §143], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1535, 1501A–171; Pub. L. 106–291, title I, §139, Oct. 11, 2000, 114 Stat. 949; Pub. L. 107–63, title I, §122, Nov. 5, 2001, 115 Stat. 440, related to special rule for transportation contracting services. Subsec. (a) was repealed and restated in section 101524 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Subsec. (b), relating to obligation of funds received in fiscal year 2002, was repealed as obsolete.