alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James F. Gordon, Chief Executive Officer of BlastGard International, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form
10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, of BlastGard International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other
certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                |  |                                         
|--------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|August 10, 2006 |  | /s/ James F. Gordon                     
|                |  | James F. Gordon, Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Kennie, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 694]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Alessandro, J.), rendered February 7, 2005, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

*695Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see *Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Florio, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Covello, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 10.D.78

                           OFFICER COMPENSATION TABLE

     In  December  2004  the  Compensation  Committee  approved  a  base  salary
adjustment  for  the  CEO and recommended base salary adjustments for five other
officers  of  the  Company,  effective  January 1, 2005.  The Board of Directors
approved the non-CEO officer base salary adjustments in December 2004, effective
January 1, 2005.  Officer salaries as of January 1, 2005 are as set forth below:

                                                             2004  Short-Term
Name  and  Principal  Position                   Salary        Incentive Bonuses
Christopher  L.  Dutton                        $369,600           $170,592
  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer

Mary  G.  Powell                               $263,000           $113,280
  Senior  Vice  President  and
  Chief  Operating  Officer

Stephen  C.  Terry                             $211,000            $62,592
  Senior  Vice  President,
  Corporate  and  Legal  Affairs

Robert  J.  Griffin                            $185,000            $51,712
  Vice  President,  Chief  Financial
  Officer  and  Treasurer

Donald  J.  Rendall,  Jr.                       $183,000            $56,224
  Vice  President,  General  Counsel
  and  Corporate  Secretary

Walter  S.  Oakes                              $151,400            $47,040
  Vice  President  -  Field  Operations
**Exhibit 10.33**

 
|        | **Interoffice Memo** |
|--------|----------------------|
|   | ** **           |
|   | ** **           |
|   | cc:                  | C.A.  Rogerson |
|   |                 | J. D. Hill |
|   |                 |   |
|   |                 |   |
|   |                 | Wilmington,  Delaware |
|   |                 | September 1,  2004 |
|   |                 |   |

 
| TO:    | John  Televantos |
|--------|------------------|
|   |             |
| FROM:  | Ed  Carrington   |

 

This is to confirm that the Compensation Committee ofthe Hercules Board of Directors has approved the crediting of service to yourcredited service “account” twenty-five years service representing your chemicalindustry service prior to Hercules. This service is credited for purposes ofeligibility to receive benefits (but not the actual benefit calculation) underthe Hercules Pension Plan.

 

This service credit will also impact other benefiteligibility such as the Long Term Incentive Plan vesting requirement which isbased upon achieving retirement status, e.g., Early Retirement, Reduced EarlyRetirement or Normal Retirement eligibility.

 

Your official ASD-PE (Adjusted Service Date forPension Eligibility) will be changed to April 1977 immediately. Your official ASD-PC(Pension Calculation) is unchanged at April 2002.

 

----
MEMORANDUM

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants, Doc ket Id: OAR–2013-0602 FROM: Sara Ohrel, EPA SUBJECT: September 3, 2014 Meeting on Biogenic Carb on Accounting with Partnership for Policy Integrity
SUMMARY A meeting was held in person between EPA staff and Mary Booth of Partnership for Policy Integrity. The discussion included biogenic carbon accounting in t he PSD/BACT context versus the GHG rule context.
ATTENDEES Partnership for Policy Integrity Mary Booth US EPA OAR, OAP, Climate Change Division: Bill Irving, Sar a Ohrel, Jeff Cole OAR, OAP, Clean Air Markets Division: Erich Eschman n
CUTLER LAW GROUP LETTERHEAD


                                January 18, 2000

Via  Facsimile  (770)  433-9194


Ken  Honeyman
Lakota  Technologies,  Inc.
2849  Paces  Ferry  Road,  Suite  710
Atlanta,  GA  30339

Dear  Ken:

     This  letter  will  confirm  our  agreement  as  to  the  following:

     1.     The  475,000  shares  of common stock previously issued to MRC Legal
Services  Corporation  and/or  Brian A. Lebrecht shall be registered on Form S-8
within  15  days  of  the  Company's  eligibility  to  do  so;  and

     2.     An  additional  200,000  shares  of  restricted common stock will be
issued  to  MRC  Legal  Services  Corporation  in  exchange  for a credit to the
outstanding balance owing to this firm by Lakota of the lesser of (i) the entire
balance due and owing as of January 31, 2000, or (ii) $25,000.  These additional
shares  shall  also  be  registered  on Form S-8 within 15 days of the Company's
eligibility  to  do  so.

     Please  indicate  your  acceptance  of  the  terms hereof by your signature
below.


                              Sincerely,


                              /s/  Brian  A.  Lebrecht

                              Brian  A.  Lebrecht,  Esq.



Lakota  Technologies,  Inc.

/s/  Ken  Honeyman
_______________________________
By:     Ken  Honeyman,  President
#### § 318.1 Warrant of arrest.

For the purposes of section 318 of the Act, a notice to appear issued under 8 CFR part 239 (including a charging document issued to commence proceedings under sections 236 or 242 of the Act prior to April 1, 1997) shall be regarded as a warrant of arrest.
### §482f. Patents affecting forest lands

On and after June 13, 1939, all patents issued under the United States mining laws affecting lands within the watershed of headwaters of the Bonito River in the Lincoln Forest, in the State of New Mexico, shall convey title to the mineral deposits within the claim, together with the right to cut and remove so much of the mature timber therefrom as may be needed in extracting and removing the mineral deposits, if the timber is removed in accordance with the rules for timber cutting on adjoining national-forest land, but each patent shall reserve to the United States all title in or to the surface of the lands and products thereof, and no use of the surface of the claim or the resources therefrom not reasonably required for carrying on mining or prospecting shall be allowed except under the rules and regulations of the Department of Agriculture.

(June 13, 1939, ch. 201, §2, 53 Stat. 818.)
#### § 246.6 Decision and order.

The decision of the immigration judge may be oral or written. The formal enumeration of findings is not required. The order shall direct either that the proceeding be terminated or that the adjustment of status be rescinded. Service of the decision and finality of the order of the immigration judge shall be in accordance with, and as stated in §§ 240.13 (a) and (b) and 240.14 of this chapter.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 81960 / October 26, 2017

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-18234

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

 :

SIX FINANCIAL : ORDER APPOINTING

INFORMATION INC. : TAX ADMINISTRATOR

:

:

Respondent. :

___________________________________ :

By order dated June 30, 2017, the Commission issued the “Omnibus Order Directing the 

Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that Establish Distribution 

Funds” (“Omnibus Order”),1authorizing the Secretary to issue orders beginning June 2017 and for 

calendar year 2018 appointing, upon request by the Commission staff, Miller Kaplan Arase LLP, a 

certified public accounting firm, which acquired Damasco & Associates LLP (“Miller Kaplan”), 

with one of their offices located in Half Moon Bay, California, as tax administrator (“Tax 

Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund may incur tax-related 

obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department of the Treasury 

Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On October 26, 2017, the Commission staff requested the appointment of Miller Kaplan 

as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Miller Kaplan, pursuant to and in accordance with the 

Omnibus Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Brent J. Fields

Secretary

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 81057 (June 30, 2017).
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 86090 / June 11, 2019

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-17029

In the Matter of 

CHANGDA INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC. 

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by Changda International Holdings, Inc., and the 

Commission has not chosen to review the decision on its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission's Rules 

of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to Changda International Holdings, Inc.2The order 

contained in that decision is hereby declared final. The initial decision ordered that, pursuant to 

Section 12(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registration of each class of registered 

securities of Changda International Holdings, Inc., is revoked. The revocation is effective as of

June 12, 2019.

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

 Acting Secretary

 

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 Changda Int’l Holdings, Inc., Initial Decision Release No. 1366 (Mar. 12, 2019), 2019 WL

1167730. The Central Index Key number for Changda International Holdings, Inc., is: 1417624.
EXHIBIT 99.1


Certification


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and (b))





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and
(b)), each of the undersigned hereby individually certifies in his capacity as an officer of U.S.I. Holdings Corporation (the Company) that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the end of and for the periods covered by such Report.





Dated:  December 2, 2002

/s/ DAVID L. ESLICKDavid L. Eslick Chief Executive Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and (b)), is not a part of the Form 10-Q to which it refers and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by each of the above signatories to the extent of
his respective knowledge.
#### James L. McCready, Respondent, v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1249

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1249 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003.

#### § 1249.3 Reopening and reconsideration.

An applicant who alleged entry and residence since prior to July 1, 1924, but in whose case a record was created as of the date of approval of the application because evidence of continuous residence prior to July 1, 1924, was not submitted, may have his case reopened and reconsidered pursuant to § 103.5 of 8 CFR chapter I. Upon the submission of satisfactory evidence, a record of admission as of the date of alleged entry may be created.

[29 FR 11494, Aug. 11, 1964, as amended at 68 FR 10359, Mar. 5, 2003]
§ 511.307 Eligibility for Federal funding. ( a ) Subject to project approval by the Secretary, a State may obligate funds apportioned to the State under Title 23 U.S.C. sections 104(b)(1), also known as National Highway System funds, 104(b)(2), also known as CMAQ Improvement funds, and 104(b)(3), also known as STP funds, for activities relating to the planning, deployment and operation, including preventative maintenance, of real-time monitoring elements that advance the goals and purposes of the Real-Time System Management Information Program. The SPC funds, apportioned according to 23 U.S.C. 505(a), may be applied to the development and implementation of a real-time information program.
( b ) Those project applications to establish a real-time information program solely for Interstate System highways are entitled to a Federal share of 90 percent of the total project cost, pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 120(a). Those project applications to establish a real-time information program for non-Interstate highways are entitled to a Federal share of 80 percent of the total project cost, as per 23 U.S.C. 120(b).
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4750 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to make student loans 

dischargeable. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 18, 2019 

Mr. CLAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to make student 

loans dischargeable. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Relief from Excessive 

5 Debt Act’’ or the ‘‘RED Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO DISCHARGE. 

7 Section 523(a) of title 11, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) by striking paragraph (8); and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4750 IH

1 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (9) through 

2 (14B) as paragraphs (8) through (14A), respec3 tively. 

4 SEC. 3. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS. 

5 Title 11, United States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) in section 704(c)(1)(C)(iv)(I) by striking 

7 ‘‘(14A)’’ and inserting ‘‘(14)’’; 

8 (2) in section 1106(c)(1)(C)(iv)(I) by striking 

9 ‘‘(14A)’’ and inserting ‘‘(14)’’; 

10 (3) in section 1202(c)(1)(C)(iv)(I) by striking 

11 ‘‘(14A)’’ and inserting ‘‘(14)’’; and 

12 (4) in section 1328(a)(2) by striking ‘‘(8), or 

13 (9)’’ and inserting ‘‘or (8)’’. 

14 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS. 

15 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub16 section (b), this Act and the amendments made by this 

17 Act shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this 

18 Act. 

19 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.—The amend20 ments made by this Act shall apply only with respect to 

21 cases commenced under title 11 of the United States Code 

22 on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Edward Hollander v. Charles I. Judson.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Synthenol Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:






1.          The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






2.          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.







May
      14, 2008
            
            /s/
      Cecil Morris(Date)
            
            Cecil
      MorrisDirector,
      President





May
      14, 2008
            
            /s/
      John Page(Date)
            
            John
      PageDirector
      / Treasurer
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/19

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★ ■

■

■ ■

★

●

●

●

●

★

●

●

● ●
#### The Equitable Trust Company of New York, Appellant, v. Charles J. Davis, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### § 280.14 Record.

The record made under § 280.13 shall include the request for the interview or a reference to the order directing the interview; the medical certificate, if any; a copy of any record of hearing before a Board of Special Inquiry, Hearing Examiner, Hearing Officer, or Special Inquiry Officer which is relevant to the fine proceedings; the duplicate copy of the Notice of Intention to Fine; the evidence upon which such Notice was based; the duplicate of any notices to detain, deport, deliver, or remove aliens; notice to pay expenses; evidence as to whether any deposit was made or bond furnished in accordance with the Immigration and Nationality Act; reports of investigations conducted; documentary evidence and testimony adduced at the interview; the original of any affidavit or brief filed in opposition to the imposition of fine; the application for mitigation or remission; and any other relevant matter.
### §§591, 592. Repealed. Feb. 28, 1933, ch. 131, §1, 47 Stat. 1349

Sections, R.S. §§2458, 2459, related to lands producing live oak and red cedar timbers needed by Navy.
EXHIBIT 23(a)

   INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Registration  Statements
No. 2-96961 and No. 33-28095 on Form S-8 and related Prospectus of Heilig-Meyers
Company relating to Common Stock issued and issuable under the 1983 Stock Option
Plan of the Company, (ii) the Registration Statements No. 33-35263, No. 33-50086
and No.  33-64616 on Form S-8 and related  Prospectus of  Heilig-Meyers  Company
relating to Common Stock issued and issuable under the 1990 Stock Option Plan of
the  Company and  related  Prospectus  of the  Company,  (iii) the  Registration
Statement  No.  33-43791  on Form  S-8  relating  to the  Heilig-Meyers  Company
Employee  Stock  Purchase  Plan and  related  Prospectus  of the  Company,  (iv)
Registration  Statement  No.  33-54261  on Form S-8 and  related  Prospectus  of
Heilig-Meyers  Company  relating to Common Stock  issued and issuable  under the
1994 Stock Option Plan of the Company,  and (v) the  Registration  Statement No.
333-07753  on Form S-3 of  Heilig-Meyers  Company of our report  dated March 25,
1997 on the  consolidated  financial  statements  and schedule of  Heilig-Meyers
Company  and  subsidiaries,  as  listed  under  Items  14(a)  (1) and (2),  both
appearing  in the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of  Heilig-Meyers  Company for the
year ended February 28, 1997.


   /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

   Richmond, Virginia
   May 27, 1997

(page 143)
### §445d. Acquisition of additional lands, Pipestone School Reserve and non-Federal land; redefining of boundaries; quarry rights of Indians

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to add to the Pipestone National Monument such part of the Pipestone school reserve, not exceeding two hundred and fifty acres, as he deems necessary to protect archeological remains, to acquire by purchase or condemnation not exceeding ten acres of non-Federal land, as he deems necessary to improve the boundary and administration of the Pipestone National Monument Federal land, and to redefine the exterior boundaries of the Pipestone National Monument to include the lands so transferred and acquired pursuant to this section. All lands added to the Pipestone National Monument pursuant to this section shall be subject to the provisions of subsections (b) and (c) of section 445c of this title.

(June 18, 1956, ch. 401, 70 Stat. 290.)