alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EMPIRE .+·'8"_';"*;"1*6. 

Ms. Brenda Edwards 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 

Building Technologies Program 

Test Procedure Waiver - MailStop EE-2J 

1000 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washjngton, DC 20585-0121 

RE: Case No. VHE-001 

December 14, 201] 

Publication of the Petition of Waiver from Empire Comfort Systems 

From the Department of Energy Vented Home Heating Equipment Test Procedure 

Dear Ms. Edwards: 

Following are the companies and contact names of those competitors in our industry to whom I 

have sent Federal Register information concerning the above waiver request (VHE-OOl). 

Rinnai America Corporation 

103 International Drive 

Peachtree City, GA 30269-1911 

Attention: Irving Cash 

Louisville Tin & Stove 

P. O. Box 2767 

Louisville, KY 40201-2767 

Attention: Leo Brown 

Williams Furnace Company 

250 West Laurel Street 

Colton, CA 92324-1435 

Attention: Ruth Ann Davis 

Sincerely yours, 

EMPIRE COMFORT SYSTEMS, INC. 

~~~~1d"1f K:nn h J. Belding U 

Vice President - Delivery Support Services 

KJB:crb 

Empire Comfort Systems Inc. • 918 Freeburg Avenue • Belleville, Illinois 62220-2623 

618233-7420 • 800851-3153 • Fax: 618233-7097 • 800443-8648
### Clay minerals in Triassic rocks of the Colorado Plateau

By: Leonard Gene Schultz

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1147C

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of American Realty
Investors, Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q/A/2 for the period ended June 30,
2002, as filed with Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Ronald E. Kimbrough, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Acting Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date: March 4, 2003                            /s/ Ronald E. Kimbrough
     ---------------                         ----------------------------------
                                             Ronald E. Kimbrough
                                             Executive Vice President
                                             and Chief Financial Officer
                                             (Principal Financial and
                                             Accounting Officer and
                                             Acting Principal Executive Officer)
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Investment Company Act Release No. 35022; File No. 812-15481 

T. Rowe Price OHA Select Private Credit Fund and OHA Private Credit Advisors LLC

September 25, 2023

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission” or “SEC”).

ACTION: Notice.

Notice of an application under section 6(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”) 

for an exemption from sections 18(a)(2), 18(c), 18(i) and section 61(a) of the Act.

Summary of Application: Applicants request an order to permit certain closed-end management 

investment companies that have elected to be regulated as business development companies 

(“BDCs”) to issue multiple classes of shares with varying sales loads and asset-based service 

and/or distribution fees.

Applicants: T. Rowe Price OHA Select Private Credit Fund and OHA Private Credit Advisors 

LLC.

Filing Dates: The application was filed on July 5, 2023, and amended on September 13, 2023.

Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the requested relief will be issued unless

the Commission orders a hearing. Interested persons may request a hearing on any application 

by e-mailing the SEC’s Secretary at Secretarys-Office@sec.gov and serving the Applicants with a 

copy of the request by e-mail, if an e-mail address is listed for the relevant Applicant below, or 

personally or by mail, if a physical address is listed for the relevant Applicant below. Hearing 

requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on October 20, 2023, and should be

accompanied by proof of service on the Applicants, in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a 

certificate of service. Pursuant to rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should state the nature 
of the writer’s interest, any facts bearing upon the desirability of a hearing on the matter, the 

reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing

may request notification by emailing the Commission’s Secretary.

ADDRESS: The Commission: Secretarys-Office@sec.gov. Applicants: Gregory S. Rubin, Esq., 

OHA Private Credit Advisors LLC, grubin@oakhilladvisors.com, with copies to Richard 

Horowitz, Esq., Dechert, LLP, richard.horowitz@dechert.com.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura L. Solomon, Senior Counsel or Kyle R. 

Ahlgren, Branch Chief, at (202) 551-6825 (Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel’s 

Office).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For Applicants’ representations, legal analysis, and

conditions, please refer to Applicants’ application, dated September 13, 2023, which may be 

obtained via the Commission’s website by searching for the file number at the top of this 

document, or for an Applicant using the Company name search field, on the SEC’s EDGAR 

system. The SEC’s EDGAR system may be searched at 

https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/legacy/companysearch.html. You may also call the

SEC’s Public Reference Room at (202) 551-8090.

For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, under delegated

authority.

Sherry R. Haywood,

Assistant Secretary.
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  each of the  undersigned  officers  of  GreenShift
Corporation (the "Company"), certifies that:

     1.   The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the Quarter
          ended  March  31,  2007  (the   "Report")   fully  complies  with  the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                     /S/      KEVIN KREISLER
                                     -------------------------------
Dated: October 11, 2007                       KEVIN KREISLER
                                              Chief Executive Officer

                                     /S/      JACQUELINE FLYNN
                                     -------------------------------
Dated: October 11, 2007                       JACQUELINE FLYNN
                                              Chief Financial Officer



This  certification  is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,
subject  to the  knowledge  standard  contained  therein,  and not for any other
purpose.
### §669b–1. Authorization of appropriation of accumulated unappropriated receipts

There is hereby authorized to be appropriated, out of the Federal aid to wildlife restoration fund established by the Act entitled "An Act to provide that the United States shall aid the States in wildlife-restoration projects, and for other purposes", approved September 2, 1937, as amended (16 U.S.C., secs. 669–669i), for the 1956 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, an amount equal to 20 per centum of the accumulated unappropriated receipts in such fund on August 12, 1955, until the accumulated unappropriated receipts in such fund on such date have been appropriated and expended. Funds appropriated under the authority of this section shall be made available to the States in accordance with the provisions of, and under the apportionment formula set forth in, such Act of September 2, 1937, and shall be in addition to the funds appropriated under section 3 of such Act [16 U.S.C. 669b].

(Aug. 12, 1955, ch. 861, §1, 69 Stat. 698.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act entitled "An Act to provide that the United States shall aid the States in wildlife-restoration projects, and for other purposes", approved September 2, 1937, referred to in text, is act Sept. 2, 1937, ch. 899, 50 Stat. 917, known as the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act and also popularly known as the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 669 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act which comprises this chapter.
### §799. License; duration, conditions, revocation, alteration, or surrender

Licenses under this subchapter shall be issued for a period not exceeding fifty years. Each such license shall be conditioned upon acceptance by the licensee of all of the terms and conditions of this chapter and such further conditions, if any, as the Commission shall prescribe in conformity with this chapter, which said terms and conditions and the acceptance thereof shall be expressed in said license. Licenses may be revoked only for the reasons and in the manner prescribed under the provisions of this chapter, and may be altered or surrendered only upon mutual agreement between the licensee and the Commission after thirty days' public notice.

(June 10, 1920, ch. 285, pt. I, §6, 41 Stat. 1067; renumbered pt. I and amended, Aug. 26, 1935, ch. 687, title II, §§204, 212, 49 Stat. 841, 847; Pub. L. 104–106, div. D, title XLIII, §4321(i)(6), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 676; Pub. L. 104–316, title I, §108(a), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3832; Pub. L. 105–192, §2, July 14, 1998, 112 Stat. 625.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Pub. L. 105–192 inserted at end "Licenses may be revoked only for the reasons and in the manner prescribed under the provisions of this chapter, and may be altered or surrendered only upon mutual agreement between the licensee and the Commission after thirty days' public notice."

1996—Pub. L. 104–316 struck out at end "Licenses may be revoked only for the reasons and in the manner prescribed under the provisions of this chapter, and may be altered or surrendered only upon mutual agreement between the licensee and the Commission after thirty days' public notice."

Pub. L. 104–106 struck out at end "Copies of all licenses issued under the provisions of this subchapter and calling for the payment of annual charges shall be deposited with the General Accounting Office, in compliance with section 20 of title 41."

1935—Act Aug. 26, 1935, §204, amended section generally, substituting "thirty days" for "ninety days" in third sentence and inserting last sentence.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

For effective date and applicability of amendment by Pub. L. 104–106, see section 4401 of Pub. L. 104–106, set out as a note under section 2220 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
#### § 803.2 Authority to affix seal.

The Director of CSOSA or PSA (as appropriate) and each Director's designees are authorized to affix their respective Agency seal (including replicas and reproductions) to appropriate documents, certifications, and other materials for all purposes authorized by this part.

[77 FR 59082, Sept. 26, 2012]
#### In the Matter of the Application of Joseph L. Weber for an Order Canceling and Discharging of Record a Judgment Entered in the Action of The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph L. Weber, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 3.)

Order affirmed. No opinion. Present— Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 437 

Expressing support for the goals of Stomach Cancer Awareness Month. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 21, 2019 

Mr. YOUNG (for himself, Mr. CARDIN, and Mr. BRAUN) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the goals of Stomach Cancer 

Awareness Month. 

Whereas stomach cancer, also known as gastric cancer, is one 

of the most difficult cancers to detect in the early stages 

of the disease, which contributes to high mortality rates; 

Whereas stomach cancer occurs when cancer cells develop in 

the lining of the stomach; 

Whereas stomach cancer is the fifth most common type of 

cancer worldwide; 

Whereas, in 2019— 

(1) an estimated 27,510 cases of stomach cancer will 

be diagnosed in the United States; and 

(2) an estimated 11,140 people in the United States 

will die from stomach cancer; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 437 ATS 

Whereas the estimated 5-year survival rate for stomach cancer is only 31.5 percent; 

Whereas, in the United States, stomach cancer is more prevalent among racial and ethnic minorities; 

Whereas increased awareness of, and education about, stomach cancer among patients and health care providers 

could improve timely recognition of stomach cancer symptoms; 

Whereas more research into early diagnosis, screening, and 

treatment for stomach cancer is needed; and 

Whereas November 2019 is an appropriate month to observe 

Stomach Cancer Awareness Month: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) supports the goals of Stomach Cancer 

3 Awareness Month; 

4 (2) supports efforts to increase awareness of, 

5 and education about, stomach cancer among the 

6 general public of the United States; 

7 (3) recognizes the need for additional research 

8 into early diagnosis, screening, and treatment for 

9 stomach cancer; and 

10 (4) encourages States, territories, and localities 

11 of the United States to support the goals of Stom12 ach Cancer Awareness Month. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### Richard J. Mackey et al., Appellants and Respondents, v. Passaic Stone Co., Inc., et al., Respondents and Appellants.

Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur; Close, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment, to direct, judgment for appellants-respondents *691on the first cause of action, to dismiss defendants’ counterclaim, and to direct a new trial of the second cause of action, with costs to appellants-respondents to abide the event, with the following memorandum: The first cause of action is based on a written retainer, pursuant to which defendants retained plaintiffs to represent them in an action to be brought against certain parties for loss of profits in connection with the corporate defendant’s contract with the city of New York to supply certain stone. The salient portion of the retainer reads: “I agree to pay you for representing me thirty-five per cent (35%) of any moneys recovered whether as a result of settlement or after trial; and I further agree to pay the necessary disbursements of the action. It is understood that if no recovery is obtained in any way, no fee will be required of me.” When the action was begun in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, the defendants in that action set up a counterclaim for certain stone furnished to plaintiffs therein. At the close of the proof the trial court directed a verdict in favor of one defendant on his counterclaim and submitted to the jury plaintiffs’ claim for loss of profits. After the judgment on the counterclaim had been entered, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiffs on their complaint for loss of profits in the sum of $5,114.47. The question posed in the present action is whether these attorneys ar.o entitled to thirty-five percent of the amount of that judgment or thirty-five per cent of the amount left after deducting the amount of the judgment entered on the counterclaim. The trial court held that plaintiffs’ retainer applied only to the difference, and dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint insofar as they sought to recover their agreed percentage on the amount of the judgment entered in the New Jersey action for loss of profits. It is conceded that both judgments have been satisfied. In my opinion, the language used in the retainer is clear and unambiguous and should not be construed so as to limit the amount of plaintiffs’ recovery to thirty-five per cent of the money actually received, rather than to thirty-five per cent of the amount recovered where, as here, the client has received the monetary benefit of the entire recovery. *(Matter of Disborough*v. *Herdman,*52 N. Y. 660; *Saulsbury*v. *American Vulcanized Fibre Co.,*28 Del. 182.) As to the second cause of action, I believe the judgment is excessive in view of the amount involved and the time spent. Hagarty, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment, to grant judgment for plaintiffs on the first and second causes of action, as prayed for in the complaint, and to dismiss the defendants’ counterclaim, with costs, with the following memorandum: In my opinion there is no ambiguity in the retainer; and the allowance in the second cause of action is not excessive.
### §778. Establishment of experiment stations; purpose of research

The Secretary of Agriculture shall establish 1 or more centers for the purpose of carrying on a program of research and experimentation—

(1) to determine species of fishes most suitable for culture on a commercial basis in shallow reservoirs and flooded rice lands;

(2) to determine methods for production of fingerling fishes for stocking in commercial reservoirs;

(3) to develop methods for the control of parasites and diseases of brood fishes and of fingerlings prior to stocking;

(4) to develop economical methods for raising the more desirable species of fishes to a marketable size;

(5) to determine, in cooperation with the Secretary of the Interior, the effects of fish-rice rotations, including crops other than rice commonly grown on rice farms, upon both the fish and other crops; and

(6) to develop suitable methods for harvesting the fish crop and preparing it for marketing, including a study of sport fishing as a means of such harvest.

(Pub. L. 85–342, §1, Mar. 15, 1958, 72 Stat. 35; Pub. L. 104–127, title VIII, §889(a)(1), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1180.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–127, in introductory provisions, substituted "Secretary of Agriculture shall" for "Secretary of the Interior is authorized and directed to" and "1 or more centers" for "an experiment station or stations" and, in par. (5), substituted "Secretary of the Interior" for "Department of Agriculture".
# Official Journal C 392/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 392 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 577 November 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 392

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 577 November 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 392/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 392/01

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 392/02 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7367 — CNP/Santander/Santander Irish insurance subsidiaries) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 2 |
| 2014/C 392/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7375 — UTC/CIAT) (1) | 3 |
| 2014/C 392/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7436 — Vista/TIBCO) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 4 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2014/C 392/02

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7367 — CNP/Santander/Santander Irish insurance subsidiaries) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

2

2014/C 392/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7375 — UTC/CIAT) (1)

3

2014/C 392/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7436 — Vista/TIBCO) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. William J. Donnelly, Relator, v. Rhinelander Waldo, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, Respondent.

Writ dismissed and proceedings affirmed, with fifty *905dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.