alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


Exhibit 31
                        WORLD MARKETING, INC. FORM 10-QSB
                       FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MAY 31, 2006
      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Jacob Roth, CEO and CFO, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of World Marketing,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us
by others within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


/s/ JACOB ROTH
---------------------------
Jacob Roth
CEO and CFO

July 21, 2006
### §460nnn–42. Cooperative efforts to control development and encourage conservation

#### (a) Policy

Development on public and private lands within the boundaries of the Cooperative Management and Protection Area which is different from the current character and uses of the lands is inconsistent with the purposes of this subchapter.

#### (b) Use of nondevelopment and conservation easements

The Secretary may enter into a nondevelopment easement or conservation easement with willing landowners to further the purposes of this subchapter.

#### (c) Conservation incentive payments

The Secretary may provide technical assistance, cost-share payments, incentive payments, and education to a private landowner in the Cooperative Management and Protection Area who enters into a contract with the Secretary to protect or enhance ecological resources on the private land covered by the contract if those protections or enhancements benefit public lands.

#### (d) Relation to property rights and State and local law

Nothing in this subchapter is intended to affect rights or interests in real property or supersede State law.

(Pub. L. 106–399, title I, §122, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1664.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in subsecs. (a), (b), and (d), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 106–399, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1655, known as the Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Act of 2000, which is classified generally to this subchapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 460nnn of this title and Tables.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                               2
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,438
<ALLOWANCES>                                       302
<INVENTORY>                                      2,666
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,230
<PP&E>                                           1,109
<DEPRECIATION>                                     675
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,492
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,123
<BONDS>                                          2,629
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         19
<COMMON>                                            32
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,689
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,492
<SALES>                                         13,893
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,344
<CGS>                                           11,476
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,476
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    47
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 230
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (233)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         7
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (88)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (88)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)


</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 124/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 124 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 505 June 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 124

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 505 June 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2007/C 124/01 | Special Report No 1/2007 concerning the implementation of the mid-term processes on the Structural Funds 2000-2006 together with the Commission's replies | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Court of Auditors

2007/C 124/01

Special Report No 1/2007 concerning the implementation of the mid-term processes on the Structural Funds 2000-2006 together with the Commission's replies

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
### §674a. Sullys Hill National Park; transfer of control; change of name to White Horse Hill National Game Preserve; boundaries; use by public; hunting

The Secretary of the Interior shall administer Sullys Hill National Park, together with all improvements thereon, in the State of North Dakota, as a big game preserve, refuge, and breeding grounds for wild animals and birds, which shall be known as the White Horse Hill National Game Preserve and shall embrace within its boundaries the lands described in the proclamation of June 2, 1904, establishing Sullys Hill Park, together with all unsurveyed or public lands uncovered by the recession of the waters of Devils Lake in front of said reservation, the preserve to be bounded on the north and northwest by the waters of Devils Lake, and on the west and southwest by a stream which flows through lands uncovered by the recession of the waters of Devils Lake, approximately midway between lots 10 and 11, section 17; lots 1, 2, 6, and 8, section 16; and lot 2, section 9; lots 3, 4, and 5, section 16, township 152 north, range 65 west, fifth principal meridian, as meandered on the official plats of survey approved June 23, 1904, and June 2, 1927: Provided, That the said game preserve is to be made available to the public for recreational purposes insofar as consistent with the use of this area as a game preserve: Provided further, That hunting shall not be permitted on said game preserve.

(Mar. 3, 1931, ch. 439, §1, 46 Stat. 1509; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. II, §4(f), eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2731, 53 Stat. 1433; Pub. L. 116–94, div. P, title IV, §402(a), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 3191.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–94 substituted "White Horse Hill National Game Preserve" for "Sullys Hill National Game Preserve" in text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Pub. L. 116–94, div. P, title IV, §402(c), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 3191, provided that: "Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Sullys Hill National Game Preserve shall be considered to be a reference to the 'White Horse Hill National Game Preserve'."

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Reorg. Plan No. II of 1939, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, transferred functions of Secretary of Agriculture relating to conservation of wildlife, game, and migratory birds to Secretary of the Interior.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of BlastGard International, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the companys financial condition and results of operations.

August 14, 2008



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ Andrew McKinnon                     
|Andrew McKinnon, Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 91934 / May 19, 2021

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20206

In the Matter of

Wireline, Inc.,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

On February 22, 2019, the Commission issued an Omnibus Order Directing the 

Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that Establish Distribution Funds 

(the “Omnibus Order”)1 authorizing the Secretary2to issue orders for calendar years 2019-2021 

appointing, upon request by the Commission staff, Miller Kaplan Arase LLP (“Miller Kaplan”), a 

certified public accounting firm, with one of their offices located in San Francisco, California, as 

tax administrator (“Tax Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund 

may incur tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department 

of the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On May 17, 2021, the Commission staff requested, pursuant to the Omnibus Order, the 

appointment of Miller Kaplan as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced 

proceeding.

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 85174 (Feb. 22, 2019).

2

 Effective December 29, 2020, the Director of the Division of Enforcement is now also authorized to make 

appointments in accordance with the Omnibus Order. See Delegation of Authority to Director of the Division of 

Enforcement, Securities Act Rel. No. 10900 (Dec. 10, 2020).
2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Miller Kaplan, pursuant to and in accordance with the 

Omnibus Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.3

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

3

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(ii).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM HERCULES
INCORPORATED'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          68,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  676,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,000
<INVENTORY>                                    416,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,240,000
<PP&E>                                       3,037,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,599,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,833,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,317,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        81,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     478,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,833,000
<SALES>                                      2,145,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,145,000
<CGS>                                        1,287,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,953,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             103,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 77,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    68,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
#### § 293.1 Computation of interest.

The Secretary of the Treasury determines the rate at which an immigration bond secured by cash shall bear interest, consistent with 8 CFR 293.2. Interest shall be computed from the deposit date to and including the refund date or breach date of the immigration bond. For purposes of this part, the deposit date shall be the date shown on the receipt for the cash received as security on an immigration bond. The refund date shall be the date upon which the interest is certified to the Treasury Department for payment. The breach date shall be the date the immigration bond was breached as shown on Form I-323—“Notice—Immigration Bond Breached.” In counting the number of days for which interest shall be computed, the day on which the cash was deposited shall not be counted; however, the refund date or the breach date shall be counted.

[80 FR 34242, June 16, 2015]
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 70390 / September 13, 2013

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-14594

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of : ORDER GRANTING

CREDIT SUISSE ALTERNATIVE : EXTENSION OF TIME

CAPITAL, LLC (f/k/a CREDIT : TO SUBMIT PROPOSED

SUISSE ALTERNATIVE CAPITAL, : PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

INC.), CREDIT SUISSE ASSET :

MANAGEMENT, LLC, and :

SAMIR H. BHATT : 

:

Respondents. :

____________________________________:

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested a third order for an 

extension of time, until March 14, 2014, to submit a proposed Plan of Distribution 

(“distribution plan”) in the above-captioned matter, under Rule 1101(a) of the 

Commission Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans. In its request, the Division 

states that the violations in this matter arise in connection with the same conduct 

alleged in SEC v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (the “Citigroup action” or the “civil 

action”) (11-cv-7387), a settled case filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern 

District of New York, which settlement was rejected by the Court and the case set for 

trial on July 16, 2012. The SEC appealed the trial court’s rulings to the U.S. Court of 

Appeals for the Second Circuit (“Second Circuit”), and a stay was entered on March 

15, 2012 pending resolution of the appeal.1 Oral arguments were heard before the 

 

1

See United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Docket No. 

11-05227 (2d Cir. Dec. 20, 2011).
2

Second Circuit on February 8, 2013. As of September 13, 2013, the Second Circuit 

has not reached a decision.

The Division intends that the funds paid by the Respondents in this

administrative proceeding be combined with any funds paid by Citigroup Global 

Markets in the civil action for distribution to injured investors once a final judgment in 

the civil action is entered. Because the Division is unable to plan for the distribution 

of the combined funds until after a final judgment is entered in the civil action, the 

Division seeks an extension of time to submit the proposed plan of distribution until 

after a final judgment in the civil action has been entered. 

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 

Division’s request for an extension of time until March 14, 2014, to submit a proposed 

plan of distribution is granted. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority. 

Elizabeth M. Murphy 

Secretary
### §4201. Statement of purpose

The purpose of this chapter is to perpetuate healthy populations of African elephants.

(Pub. L. 100–478, title II, §2002, Oct. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 2315.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 2007 Amendment

Pub. L. 110–132, §1, Dec. 6, 2007, 121 Stat. 1360, provided that: "This Act [amending sections 4211, 4245, 5304, and 5306 of this title] may be cited as the 'Multinational Species Conservation Funds Reauthorization Act of 2007'."

#### Short Title of 2002 Amendment

Pub. L. 107–111, §1, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 2095, provided that: "This Act [enacting section 4214 of this title, amending sections 4211, 4212, and 4244 to 4246 of this title, and repealing section 4243 of this title] may be cited as the 'African Elephant Conservation Reauthorization Act of 2001'."

#### Short Title of 1998 Amendment

Pub. L. 105–217, §1, Aug. 5, 1998, 112 Stat. 911, provided that: "This Act [amending section 4245 of this title] may be cited as the 'African Elephant Conservation Reauthorization Act of 1998'."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 100–478, title II, §2001, Oct. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 2315, provided that: "This title [enacting this chapter and amending section 1538 of this title] may be cited as the 'African Elephant Conservation Act'."
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR EQUIVALENT

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with Annual Report of Hitachi, Ltd. on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2007 as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto (the Report) pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) for the purpose of complying with Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Kazuo Furukawa, President and Chief Executive Officer of Hitachi, Ltd., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hitachi, Ltd.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           |  |     |  |                                                       
|-------------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Date:    November 30, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Kazuo Furukawa                                    
|                           |  |     |  | Name:         Kazuo Furukawa                          
|                           |  |     |  | Title:           President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Doroteo AYALA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 01-71442. I & NS No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 4, 2002.*

Decided May 14, 2002.

Before SKOPIL, BOOCHEVER, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM** .

Doroteo Ayala, a native and citizen of Mexico, has been ordered removed from this country. He petitions for review of that order, arguing that he should be granted suspension of deportation. Because such relief is no longer available, we must reject his argument and deny his petition for review.

Prior to April 1, 1997, the effective date of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA), an alien placed in deportation proceedings could apply for suspension of deportation. *597IIRIRA, however, repealed the availability of suspension of deportation and replaced it with cancellation of removal. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229b. Ayala concedes that he cannot meet the stringent eligibility requirements for cancellation of removal. Rather, he argues that he has a due process right to apply for suspension of deportation.

We reject his argument. The record indicates that the INS commenced its action against Ayala on March 3, 2000. Removal proceedings apply whenever the “alien’s proceedings commenced ... on or after April 1, 1997.... ” *See Cortez-Felipe v. INS,*245 F.3d 1054, 1056 (9th Cir. 2001). We have held that application of IIRIRA “to bar the prospective relief of suspension of deportation does not offend due process.” *See Ram v. INS,*243 F.3d 510, 517 (9th Cir.2001). Finally, although certain aliens may have preserved by plea agreement the right to apply for suspension of deportation, *see INS v. St. Cyr,*533 U.S. 289, 121 S.Ct. 2271, 150 L.Ed.2d 347 (2001), there is no plea agreement in this case or other evidence of a reservation of rights. Accordingly, we conclude that Ayala is not entitled to suspension of deportation.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.