Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 44679 

method to be approved by the Manager, 

Wichita ACO, as required by this paragraph, 

the Manager’s approval letter must 

specifically refer to this AD. 

(h) Replacement 

If any cracking is found during any 

inspection required by paragraph (g) of this 

AD: Before further flight, replace the 

horizontal rib assemblies with new 

horizontal rib assemblies, in accordance with 

a method approved by the Manager, Wichita 

ACO. For a replacement method to be 

approved by the Manager, Wichita ACO, as 

required by this paragraph, the Manager’s 

approval letter must specifically refer to this 

AD. This replacement does not terminate the 

repetitive inspection requirements of 

paragraph (g) of this AD. 

(i) Special Flight Permit 

Special flight permits may be issued in 

accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 

of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 

21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to 

a location where the airplane can be repaired 

(if the operator elects to do so), provided the 

restrictions specified in paragraphs (i)(1) 

through (i)(4) of this AD are followed. 

(1) Do not exceed 10 flight hours of 

operation. 

(2) Only operations under daylight 

conditions and under visual flight rules are 

allowed. 

(3) Only operations with the minimum 

flightcrew and with no passengers are 

allowed. 

(4) Do not exceed maneuver speed as 

specified in the applicable airplane flight 

manual. 

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Airframe Branch, ACE– 

118W, FAA, has the authority to approve 

AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the 

procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In 

accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your 

request to your principal inspector or local 

Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 

attention of the person identified in 

paragraph (k) of this AD. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/

certificate holding district office. 

(k) Related Information 

For more information about this AD, 

contact Paul Chapman, Aerospace Engineer, 

Airframe Branch, ACE–118W, FAA, Wichita 

Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1801 

Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent 

Airport, Wichita, KS 67209; phone: 316–946– 

4152; fax: 316–946–4107; email: 

paul.chapman@faa.gov. 

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference 

None. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 14, 

2014. 

Michael Kaszycki, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–17921 Filed 7–31–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0384; Airspace 

Docket No. 14–ANE–6] 

Amendment of Class D and Class E 

Airspace; Hartford, CT 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule; technical 

amendment. 

SUMMARY: This action amends Class D 

and Class E Airspace at Hartford, CT, by 

updating the geographic coordinates of 

Hartford-Brainard Airport. This action 

does not change the boundaries or 

operating requirements of the airspace. 

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, September 

18, 2014. The Director of the Federal 

Register approves this incorporation by 

reference action under title 1, Code of 

Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to 

the annual revision of FAA Order 

7400.9 and publication of conforming 

amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Fornito, Operations Support Group, 

Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation 

Administration, P.O. Box 20636, 

Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 

305–6364. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

The Rule 

This action amends Title 14 Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 by 

adjusting the geographic coordinates, 

within Class D and Class E airspace, of 

Hartford-Brainard Airport, Hartford, CT, 

to coincide with the FAA’s aeronautical 

database. This is an administrative 

change and does not affect the 

boundaries, altitudes, or operating 

requirements of the airspace, therefore, 

notice and public procedure under 5 

U.S.C. 553(b) are unnecessary. 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is 

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that only affects air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, does not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, 

Section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the agency’s 

authority. This rulemaking is 

promulgated under the authority 

described in Subtitle VII, Part A, 

Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority as it amends 

controlled airspace at Hartford-Brainard 

Airport, Hartford, CT. 

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (Air). 

Adoption of the Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR Part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9X, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

dated August 7, 2013, effective 

September 15, 2013, is amended as 

follows: 

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace 

* * * * * 

ANE CT D Hartford, CT [Amended] 

Hartford-Brainard Airport, CT 

(Lat. 41°44′12′′ N., long. 72°38′58′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from the 

surface up to and including 2,500 feet MSL 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
44680 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 148 / Friday, August 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

within a 4.6-mile radius of Hartford-Brainard 

Airport from the Hartford-Brainard Airport 

158° bearing clockwise to the HartfordBrainard Airport 052° bearing, and within a 

6-mile radius of the Hartford-Brainard 

Airport from the Hartford-Brainard Airport 

052° bearing clockwise to the 158° bearing. 

This Class D airspace area is effective during 

specific dates and times established in 

advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective 

date and time will thereafter be continuously 

published in the Airport/Facility Directory 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas 

Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More 

Above the Surface of the Earth. 

* * * * * 

ANE CT E5 Hartford, CT [Amended] 

Hartford-Brainard Airport, CT 

(Lat. 41°44′12′′ N., long. 72°38′58′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within an 11.5-mile 

radius of Hartford-Brainard Airport. 

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on July 24, 

2014. 

Myron A. Jenkins, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern 

Service Center, Air Traffic Organization. 

[FR Doc. 2014–18067 Filed 7–31–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

15 CFR Part 744 

[Docket No. 140627545–4617–01] 

RIN 0694–AG22 

Addition of Certain Persons to the 

Entity List 

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Commerce. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This rule amends the Export 

Administration Regulations (EAR) by 

adding sixteen persons under nineteen 

entries to the Entity List. The persons 

who are added to the Entity List have 

been determined by the U.S. 

Government to be acting contrary to the 

national security or foreign policy 

interests of the United States. These 

persons will be listed on the Entity List 

under the destinations of Afghanistan, 

China, Hong Kong, Iran, and the United 

Arab Emirates (U.A.E.). There are 

nineteen entries for sixteen persons 

because three persons are listed under 

multiple destinations, resulting in three 

additional entries: one person in the 

U.A.E. has an address in Iran and two 

persons in China each have one address 

in Hong Kong. 

DATES: This rule is effective August 1, 

2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Chair, End-User Review Committee, 

Office of the Assistant Secretary, Export 

Administration, Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Department of Commerce, 

Phone: (202) 482–5991, Fax: (202) 482– 

3911, Email: ERC@bis.doc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Entity List (Supplement No. 4 to 

Part 744) notifies the public about 

entities that have engaged in activities 

that could result in increased risk of 

diversion of exported, reexported or 

transferred (in-country) items to 

weapons of mass destruction (WMD) 

programs. Since its initial publication, 

grounds for inclusion on the Entity List 

have expanded to include activities 

sanctioned by the State Department and 

activities contrary to U.S. national 

security or foreign policy interests. 

Certain exports, reexports, and transfers 

(in-country) to entities on the Entity List 

require licenses from BIS. License 

applications are reviewed with a 

presumption of denial. The availability 

of license exceptions for exports, 

reexports on transfers (in-country) is 

very limited. The license review policy 

for each entity is identified in the 

license review policy column on the 

Entity List. The availability of license 

exceptions is noted in the Federal 

Register notices adding persons to the 

Entity List. BIS places entities on the 

Entity List based on certain sections of 

part 744 (Control Policy: End-User and 

End-Use Based) of the EAR. 

The End-user Review Committee 

(ERC), composed of representatives of 

the Departments of Commerce (Chair), 

State, Defense, Energy and, where 

appropriate, the Treasury, makes all 

decisions regarding additions to, 

removals from, or other modifications to 

the Entity List. The ERC makes all 

decisions to add an entry to the Entity 

List by majority vote and all decisions 

to remove or modify an entry by 

unanimous vote. 

ERC Entity List Decisions 

Additions to the Entity List 

This rule implements the decision of 

the ERC to add sixteen persons under 

nineteen entries to the Entity List on the 

basis of § 744.11 (License requirements 

that apply to entities acting contrary to 

the national security or foreign policy 

interests of the United States) of the 

EAR. The nineteen entries added to the 

Entity List consist of five entries in 

Afghanistan, seven entries in China, two 

entries in Hong Kong, one entry in Iran, 

and four entries in the U.A.E. 

The ERC reviewed § 744.11(b) 

(Criteria for revising the Entity List) in 

making the determination to add these 

sixteen persons to the Entity List. Under 

that paragraph, entities for whom there 

is reasonable cause to believe, based on 

specific and articulable facts, have been 

involved, are involved, or pose a 

significant risk of being or becoming 

involved, in activities that are contrary 

to the national security or foreign policy 

interests of the United States, and those 

acting on behalf of such persons may be 

added to the Entity List. Paragraphs 

(b)(1) through (b)(5) of § 744.11 include 

an illustrative list of activities that could 

be contrary to the national security or 

foreign policy interests of the United 

States. 

The ERC determined to add four 

persons—FIMCO FZE, Crescent 

International Trade and Services FZE, 

Khosrow Kasraei, and Mujhid Ali– to 

the Entity List under five entries under 

the destinations of Iran and the U.A.E. 

on the basis of their involvement in 

activities contrary to the national 

security and foreign policy of the United 

States, under § 744.11(b)(2). These 

companies and their affiliates have been 

engaging in conduct that poses a risk of 

violating the EAR, specifically with 

regard to the attempted illicit reexport 

of U.S.-origin items to Iran, under 

§ 744.11(b)(2). These four persons were 

involved in the attempted export of a 

lathe machine subject to the EAR to Iran 

in violation of Department of the 

Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets 

Control regulations and the EAR. Lathe 

machines are used in the production of 

high grade steel or ‘‘bright steel’’, which 

in turn may be used, among other 

things, in the manufacture of 

automobile and aircraft parts. 

The ERC determined to add five 

persons—Emal Bilal Construction 

Company, Wahab Karwan Construction 

Company, Mohammad Jan Khan 

Mangal, Shan Mahmoud Khan Mangal, 

and Emal Bilal Mangal—to the Entity 

List under the destination of 

Afghanistan for involvement in 

activities contrary to the national 

security and foreign policy interests of 

the United States, specifically the 

activities described under paragraph 

(b)(1) (Supporting persons engaged in 

acts of terror) of § 744.11 of the EAR. 

These persons have engaged in activities 

in support of persons designated by the 

Secretary of State as a Foreign Terrorist 

Organization (FTO). The persons 

designated as FTOs were so designated 

as a result of their activities against U.S. 

and coalition forces in Afghanistan 

contrary to the national security and 

foreign policy of the United States. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES