alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 462 

Designating January 2020 as ‘‘National One Health Awareness Month’’ to 

promote awareness of organizations focused on public health, animal 

health, and environmental health collaboration throughout the United 

States and to recognize the critical contributions of those organizations 

to the future of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 19, 2019 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Ms. MCSALLY, Ms. SMITH, Mr. BROWN, Mr. 

KING, Mr. CASEY, and Mr. PETERS) submitted the following resolution; 

which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating January 2020 as ‘‘National One Health Awareness Month’’ to promote awareness of organizations focused on public health, animal health, and environmental 

health collaboration throughout the United States and 

to recognize the critical contributions of those organizations to the future of the United States. 

Whereas One Health is a collaborative, multisectoral, and 

transdisciplinary approach, working at the local, regional, 

national, and global levels, with the goal of achieving optimal health outcomes recognizing the interconnection between people, animals, plants, and their shared environment; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 462 ATS 

Whereas the mission of One Health is to establish closer professional interactions, collaborations, and educational opportunities across the various medical, veterinary, and 

environmental health professions and their allied science 

professions to simultaneously improve public health, animal health, and environmental health; 

Whereas the increasing threats posed by emerging diseases 

shared between animals and people, foodborne, vectorborne, and waterborne diseases, and other environmental 

factors may support the need for an integrated effort by 

professionals from multiple disciplines, including health, 

science, technology, and engineering; 

Whereas, according to the Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention, up to 75 percent of new or emerging infectious diseases in people are spread by animals; 

Whereas, each year, International One Health Day is November 3; and 

Whereas One Health is essential to combating and strengthening the surveillance of emerging and reemerging diseases: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates January 2020 

2 as ‘‘National One Health Awareness Month’’ to— 

3 (1) promote awareness of organizations that 

4 focus on One Health efforts to improve the quality 

5 of life for people and animals; 

6 (2) recognize the efforts made by such organi7 zations in using a One Health approach to prevent 

8 epidemics; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•SRES 462 ATS 

1 (3) recognize the importance of using the One 

2 Health approach to simultaneously protect the 

3 health of people, animals, plants, and the environ4 ment in the United States. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
### §695g. Authorization of appropriations

There are hereby authorized to be appropriated such funds, not to exceed $400,000, for construction of necessary works to supply water for State and federally owned and operated waterfowl management areas in the San Joaquin Valley to carry out the purposes of sections 695d to 695j–1 of this title.

(Aug. 27, 1954, ch. 1012, §4, 68 Stat. 879.)
### §532. Roads and trails system; Congressional findings and declaration of policy

The Congress hereby finds and declares that the construction and maintenance of an adequate system of roads and trails within and near the national forests and other lands administered by the Forest Service is essential if increasing demands for timber, recreation, and other uses of such lands are to be met; that the existence of such a system would have the effect, among other things, of increasing the value of timber and other resources tributary to such roads; and that such a system is essential to enable the Secretary of Agriculture (hereinafter called the Secretary) to provide for intensive use, protection, development, and management of these lands under principles of multiple use and sustained yield of products and services.

(Pub. L. 88–657, §1, Oct. 13, 1964, 78 Stat. 1089.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 88–657, Oct. 13, 1964, 78 Stat. 1089, which enacted sections 532 et seq. of this title, is popularly known as the "Forest Roads and Trails Act".
§ 8.21 Posting of substitute monetary amount in an administrative forfeiture proceeding. ( a ) Where property is seized for administrative forfeiture involving controlled substances in personal use quantities, the owner may obtain release of the property by posting a substitute monetary amount with the seizing agency to be held subject to forfeiture proceedings in place of the seized property to be released. The property will be released to the owner upon the payment of an amount equal to the government appraised value of the property if the property is not evidence of a violation of law and has no design or other characteristics that particularly suit it for use in illegal activities. This payment must be in the form of a traveler's check, a money order, a cashier's check, or an irrevocable letter of credit made payable to the seizing agency. A bond in the form of a cashier's check will be considered as paid once the check has been accepted for payment by the financial institution which issued the check.
( b ) If a substitute amount is posted and the property is administratively forfeited, the seizing agency will forfeit the substitute amount in lieu of the property.
#### Max Hochstim v. John A. Sonntag.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
**Exhibit 23**
**Consent of Independent Auditors**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) ofHibernia Corporation of our report dated January 16, 2001, included in the 2000Annual Report to Shareholders of Hibernia Corporation.
We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Hibernia Corporation Registration Statements            Form S-3 No. 33-26553 (dated February 21, 1989)            Form S-8 No. 2-81353 (dated February 23, 1989)            Form S-8 No. 33-26871 (dated February 23, 1989)            Form S-3 No. 33-37701 (dated January 31, 1991)            Form S-8 No. 2-96194 (dated April 8, 1991)            Form S-3 No. 33-53108 (dated December 28, 1992)            Form S-3 No. 33-55844 (dated December 28, 1992)            Form S-8 No. 33-59743 (dated June 1, 1995)            Form S-3 No. 333-8133 (dated September 19, 1996)            Form S-8 No. 333-07761 (dated July 8, 1996)            Form S-8 No. 333-36017 (dated September 19, 1997)            Form S-8 No. 333-56053 (dated June 4, 1998)            Form S-8 No. 333-83611 (dated July 23, 1999)
of our report datedJanuary 16, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofHibernia Corporation incorporated by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)for the year ended December 31, 2000.

/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLPNew Orleans, LouisianaMarch 26, 2001
**Part II, Section A, Item 1(d) –**  **Process Description TS**  **- C5072P**
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Potter, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 638]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Harold Silverman, J.), rendered February 18, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 25 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court accorded defendant ample scope in which to assert a claim of justification, and its rulings did not impair defendant’s right to present a defense (see *Crane v Kentucky,*476 US 683, 689-690 [1986]). Defendant testified, among other things, that he was struggling with the deceased when a knife fell to the ground, and that although he did not know where the knife came from, he was afraid that the deceased would pick it up and use it against him. The court properly exercised its discretion in precluding defendant from testifying as to his surmise that the knife belonged to the deceased, since defendant’s belief as to the ownership of the knife was irrelevant *(see People v Aska,*91 NY2d 979, 981 [1998]) to his stated fear that the deceased was about to acquire and use it. In any event, were we to find any error, we would find it to be harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence disproving defendant’s justification defense. To the extent that defendant is also claiming that he should have been permitted to testify about the deceased’s dealings in marijuana, we find that claim to be without merit.

Defendant’s challenge to the court’s response to a jury note is unpreserved (see *People v Williams,*297 AD2d 565 [2002], *lv*
      *401
      *denied*99 NY2d 566 [2002]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the court’s response was meaningful and appropriately conveyed the applicable legal principles *(see People v Almodovar,*62 NY2d 126, 131 [1984]).

The record does not establish that defendant’s sentence was based on any improper criteria, and we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur—Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Sullivan, Nardelli and Malone, JJ.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 83914 / August 23, 2018

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-18324

In the Matter of

Train, Babcock Advisors LLC,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

By order dated June 30, 2017, the Commission issued the “Omnibus Order 

Directing the Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that 

Establish Distribution Funds” (“Omnibus Order”),1authorizing the Secretary to issue 

orders beginning June 2017 and for calendar year 2018 appointing, upon request by the 

Commission staff, Miller Kaplan Arase LLP, a certified public accounting firm, which 

acquired Damasco & Associates LLP (“Miller Kaplan”), with one of their offices 

located in San Fransciso, California, as tax administrator (“Tax Administrator”) in 

administrative proceedings where the distribution fund may incur tax-related 

obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department of the 

Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On August 21, 2018, the Commission staff requested, pursuant to the Omnibus 

Order, the appointment of Miller Kaplan as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the 

above-referenced proceeding. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Miller Kaplan, pursuant to and in accordance 

with the Omnibus Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the abovereferenced proceeding. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Brent J. Fields

Secretary

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 81057 (June 30, 2017).
###### Editorial Note on Part 645

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 645 appear at 65 FR 70311, Nov. 22, 2000.

#### § 645.309 Limitations.

Nothing in this subpart establishes a mandate or requirement that a State install or allow the installation of broadband infrastructure in a highway right-of-way. Nothing in this subpart authorizes the Secretary to withhold or reserve funds or approval of a project under Title 23 of the U.S.C.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of BlastGard International, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the company on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended September 30, 2004, as amended, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the companys financial condition and results of operations.



March 15,
2005



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ James F. Gordon                     
|James F. Gordon, Chief Executive Officer
Case 16-32141-KRH Doc 85 Filed 02/15/19 Entered 02/15/19 16:10:29 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
### §659. Sea lions; acts prohibiting killing repealed

All Acts and parts of Acts making it unlawful to kill sea lions, as game animals or otherwise, in the waters of the Territory of Alaska are repealed.

(June 16, 1934, ch. 556, 48 Stat. 976; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. II, §4(e), eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2731, 53 Stat. 1433; Pub. L. 92–522, title I, §113(b), Oct. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 1042.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1972—Pub. L. 92–522 struck out proviso prohibiting killing of sea lions in waters of Alaska except under rules and regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Interior.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

Reorg. Plan No. II of 1939, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, transferred Bureau of Fisheries in Department of Commerce, and its functions and functions of Secretary of Commerce relating to protection of fur seals and other fur-bearing animals and supervision of Pribilof Islands and care of natives thereof, to Department of the Interior.

#### Admission of Alaska as State

Admission of Alaska into the Union was accomplished Jan. 3, 1959, on issuance of Proc. No. 3269, Jan. 3, 1959, 24 F.R. 81, 73 Stat. c16, as required by sections 1 and 8(c) of Pub. L. 85–508, July 7, 1958, 72 Stat. 339, set out as notes preceding section 21 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
### §62. Possession of dead bodies of birds or animals

Possession within said parks, or either of them, of the dead bodies or any part thereof of any wild bird or animal shall be prima facie evidence that person or persons having same are guilty of violating sections 60 to 63 of this title.

(June 2, 1920, ch. 218, §5, 41 Stat. 732.)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7334

BRYAN GARNETT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GARY WATERS, Chief of Security; THOMPSON,

Deputy Court Escort; JOHN DOE, Medical

Administrator; COFRAN, Deputy; JOHN DOE, No. 1

Deputy; COLTRALL, Deputy; All others

associated, sued in their individual and

official capacities,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

COFTRAN, Deputy Court Escort,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District

Judge. (3:06-cv-00314-HEH)

Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 20, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
- 2 -

Bryan Garnett, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Bryan Garnett appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Garnett v. Waters,

No. 3:06-cv-00314-HEH (E.D. Va. Aug. 14, 2007). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §460q–4. Hunting and fishing

Each Secretary shall permit hunting and fishing on lands and waters under his jurisdiction within the recreation area in accordance with the applicable laws of the State of California and of the United States: Provided, That each Secretary may designate zones where, and establish periods when, no hunting or fishing shall be permitted for reasons of public safety, administration, or public use and enjoyment not compatible with hunting or fishing. Regulations prescribing any such restrictions shall be issued after consultation with the California Department of Fish and Game.

(Pub. L. 89–336, §5, Nov. 8, 1965, 79 Stat. 1298.)
# Official Journal C 291/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 291 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5730 August 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 291

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5730 August 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 291/01 | Communication from the Commission — Notice on agreements of minor importance which do not appreciably restrict competition under Article 101(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (De Minimis Notice) | 1 |
| 2014/C 291/02 | Communication from the Commission concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2015 under certain quotas opened by the European Union for products in the poultrymeat sector | 5 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 291/01

Communication from the Commission — Notice on agreements of minor importance which do not appreciably restrict competition under Article 101(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (De Minimis Notice)

1

2014/C 291/02

Communication from the Commission concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2015 under certain quotas opened by the European Union for products in the poultrymeat sector

5

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 291/03 | Euro exchange rates | 6 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 291/03

Euro exchange rates

6

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 291/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7341 — MVD/Postcon/ADVO inter alia) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 7 |
| 2014/C 291/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7376 — Droege/Weltbild) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 8 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2014/C 291/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7341 — MVD/Postcon/ADVO inter alia) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

7

2014/C 291/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7376 — Droege/Weltbild) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

8

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Liska Biometry,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly  period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Manoj  Hippola,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  to my best
knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By:      /s/ Manoj Hippola
         Manoj Hippola
         CFO

Dated:  August 16, 2004


                                       19
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Richard Gordon MOLLETT, aka Richard Lee Ronkin, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 01-50397. D.C. No. CR-01-00043-K-02.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 3, 2002.*

Submission Vacated April 8, 2002.

Submitted April 30, 2002.

Decided May 2, 2002.

Before HAWKINS and FISHER, Circuit Judges, and WEINER, District Judge.**

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable Charles R. Weiner, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Mollett’s challenge to the facial constitutionality of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) was rejected by this circuit in *United States v. Buckland,*277 F.3d 1173 (9th Cir.2002) (en *360banc). Similarly, his challenge to the constitutionality of 21 U.S.C. § 960 is foreclosed by *United States v. Mendoza-Paz,*286 F.3d 1104 (9th Cir.2002).

Counts one and two of the indictment were properly joined with counts three and four under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 8(a). Rule 8 permits joinder if the offenses “are of the same or similar character.” In this case, the offenses were clearly of the same or similar character: both sets of counts involved violations of Sections 841 and 960 by importing the same drug at the same port of entry two times within one week. *United States v. Rousseau,*257 F.3d 925, 932 (9th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. —, 122 S.Ct. 503, 151 L.Ed.2d 413 (2001) (two counts of felon in possession, eight months apart, were clearly of same or similar character and properly joined).

Nor did the district court abuse its discretion by denying the motion to sever under Fed.R.Crim.P. 14. Mollett did not demonstrate that he would be unduly prejudiced by the joinder of counts. Furthermore, the jury was given a limiting instruction, which “militates against a finding” that any actual prejudice occurred. *See United States v. Fiorillo,*186 F.3d 1136, 1145 (9th Cir.1999).

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
(No. 76-CC-2404

#### American National Bank & Trust Company of Chicago, as Trustee under Trust No. 13571, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December 19, 1977.*

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard on the motion of Respondent to dismiss the complaint.

And the parties having stipulated to the entry of an award in the amount of $208.84 with respect to a portion of the claim.

And the parties having further stipulated that the complaint be stricken with respect to the remainder of the claim, and that Respondent be granted 30 days *187thereafter in which to file an amended complaint with respect to that portion of the claim which has been stricken.

And the Court being fully advised in the premises.

It is hereby ordered that Claimant be, and hereby is, awarded the sum of $208.84 for the expenditures shown as items Numbers 4 and 5 in Exhibit A to the complaint herein.

It is further ordered that the complaint be stricken with respect to items 1, 2 and 3 as shown on Exhibit A to the complaint, and that Claimant file a First Amended complaint with respect to the items stricken, within 30 days of the date of this order.