```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 11, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 62644-62649]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26169]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 11, 2011 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 62644]]

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

10 CFR Part 430

Request To Consider Automatic Termination Controls

AGENCY: Office of the General Counsel, Department of Energy (DOE).

ACTION: Petition for rulemaking; request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On September 8, 2011, the Department of Energy received a 
joint petition submitted by the Association of Home Appliance 
Manufacturers and the Appliance Standards Awareness Project, on behalf 
of a number of named parties requesting that the clothes dryer test 
procedure be amended to address the effectiveness of automatic 
termination controls such as moisture and temperature sensor controls. 
Public comment is requested on whether DOE should grant the petition 
and consider the proposal contained in the petition.

DATES: Comments must be postmarked no later than December 12, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Any comments submitted must reference the petition for 
rulemaking. Comments may be submitted using any of the following 
methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail: ResCDPetition-2011-PET-0062@ee.doe.gov. Include 
``Petition for Rulemaking'' in the subject line of the message.
     Postal Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of 
Energy, Building Technologies Program, Mailstop EE-2J, 1000 
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, 20585-0121. If possible, 
please submit all items on a CD. It is not necessary to include printed 
copies.
     Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department 
of Energy, Building Technologies Program, 950 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., 
Suite 600, Washington, DC, 20024. Telephone: (202) 586-2945. If 
possible, please submit all items on a CD. It is not necessary to 
include printed copies.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L.Witkowski, U.S. Department 
of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building 
Technologies Program, EE-2J, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, 
DC, 20585-0121, (202) 586-7463, e-mail: stephen.witkowski @ee.doe.gov.
    Ms. Elizabeth Kohl or Ms. Sarah Butler, U.S. Department of Energy, 
Office of General Counsel, GC-71, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC, 20585-0121, (202) 586-7796, e-mail: 
Elizabeth.Kohl@hq.doe.gov or Sarah.Butler@hq.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 
U.S.C. 551 et seq., provides among other things, that ``[each] agency 
shall give an interested person the right to petition for the issuance, 
amendment, or repeal of a rule.'' (5 U.S.C. 553(e)). Pursuant to this 
provision of the APA, the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers 
and the Appliance Standards Awareness Project, on behalf of a number of 
named parties, petitioned DOE to amend the test procedure for 
residential clothes dryers to include provisions related to automatic 
termination controls, as set forth below. In promulgating this petition 
for public comment, the DOE is seeking views on whether it should grant 
the petition and consider the proposal contained in the petition. By 
seeking comment on whether to grant this petition, the DOE takes no 
position at this time regarding the merits of the suggested amendment.
    The proposed amendment sought in the petition would institute a 
procedure that addresses the effectiveness of automatic termination 
controls such as moisture and temperature sensor controls. The 
petitioners request that DOE test the full cycle of clothes dryers, 
including cool-down. The petitioners also request that the DOE modify 
the ending remaining moisture content (RMC) to require that the RMC be 
no more than 2 percent when testing units equipped with automatic 
termination controls using the DOE test load. This petition also 
requests that the DOE revise the relevant energy conservation standards 
under section 323 of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to reflect 
the requested test procedure. The DOE seeks public comment on whether 
it should grant the petition.
    DOE notes that it issued a Request for Information (RFI) to further 
investigate the effects of automatic cycle termination on the energy 
efficiency of clothes washers. (76 FR 50145, Aug. 12, 2011). The 
petition also served as a response to DOE's RFI.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 4, 2011.
Sean A. Lev,
Acting General Counsel.

    Set forth below is the full text of the Association of Home 
Appliance Manufacturers and the Appliance Standards Awareness Project 
petition:

Joint Petition to Amend the Test Procedure for Residential Clothes 
Dryers to Include Provisions Related to Automatic Termination Controls 
Docket No. EERE-2008-BT-TP-0010; RIN 1904-AC02 and Docket No. EERE-
2011-BT-TP-0054, RIN 1904-AC63

September 8, 2011
Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Representing the following companies who are members of the 
Major Appliance Division: Whirlpool, General Electric, Electrolux, 
LG Electronics, BSH, Alliance Laundry, Viking Range, Sub-Zero Wolf, 
Friedrich A/C, U-Line, Samsung, Sharp Electronics, Miele, Heat 
Controller, AGA Marvel, Brown Stove, Haier, Fagor America, Airwell 
Group, Arcelik, Fisher & Paykel, Scotsman Ice, Indesit, 
Kuppersbusch, Kelon, and DeLonghi.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy
Natural Resources Defense Council
Alliance to Save Energy
Alliance for Water Efficiency Appliance
Standards Awareness Project Northwest
Power and Conservation Council Northeast
Energy Efficiency Partnerships Consumer
Federation of America
National Consumer Law Center

I. Introduction and Overview

    As part of the agreement between the Joint Commenters on federal 
minimum energy conservation standards for five products, including 
residential clothes dryers, and related test procedures, ENERGY STAR, 
and financial incentive provisions, the Joint Commenters agreed that 
the Department of Energy (DOE) should amend the clothes dryer test 
procedure to address the effectiveness of automatic termination 
controls such as

[[Page 62645]]

moisture and temperature sensor controls. In its final test procedure, 
however, DOE declined to adopt proposed amendments to address automatic 
termination controls. The Joint Commenters estimate that energy savings 
of approximately 1.1 quads over 30 years can be achieved through a test 
procedure revision that accounts for such controls, and thus petition 
DOE to amend the clothes dryer test procedure to account for the 
effectiveness of automatic termination controls.\2\ This petition also 
serves as joint comments in response to DOE's Request for Information 
on Test Procedures for Residential Clothes Dryers, Docket No. EERE-
2011-BT-TP-0054, RIN 1904-AC63, 76 Fed Reg. 50145 (Aug. 12, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ EPCA section 323(b)(2) provides the process which DOE must 
follow in replying to a petition for a test procedure revision. The 
Administrative Procedure Act requires that ``[e]ach agency shall 
give an interested person the right to petition for the issuance, 
amendment, or repeal of a rule.'' 5 U.S.C. Sec.  553(e).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. The Joint Stakeholders to and Supporters of the Agreement

    The American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE) is a 
nonprofit, non-partisan, organization dedicated to advancing energy 
efficiency as a means of promoting economic prosperity, energy 
security, and environmental protection. ACEEE fulfills its mission by 
conducting in-depth technical and policy assessments; advising 
policymakers and program managers; working collaboratively with 
businesses, public interest groups, and other organizations; publishing 
books, conference proceedings, and reports; organizing conferences and 
workshops; and educating consumers and businesses.
    The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) represents 
manufacturers of major, portable and floor care home appliances, and 
suppliers to the industry. AHAM's membership includes over 150 
companies throughout the world. In the U.S., AHAM members employ tens 
of thousands of people and produce more than 95% of the household 
appliances shipped for sale. The factory shipment value of these 
products is more than $30 billion annually. The home appliance 
industry, through its products and innovation, is essential to U.S. 
consumer lifestyle, health, safety and convenience. Through its 
technology, employees and productivity, the industry contributes 
significantly to U.S. jobs and economic security. Home appliances also 
are a success story in terms of energy efficiency and environmental 
protection. New appliances often represent the most effective choice a 
consumer can make to reduce home energy use and costs. AHAM represents 
the manufacturers of virtually all affected clothes dryers manufactured 
and/or sold in the United States.
    The Alliance to Save Energy (ASE) is a coalition of prominent 
business, government, environmental, and consumer leaders who promote 
the efficient and clean use of energy worldwide to benefit consumers, 
the environment, economy, and national security. Established as an NGO 
in 1977, to carry out its mission, the Alliance undertakes research, 
educational programs, and policy advocacy, designs and implements 
energy-efficiency projects, promotes technology development and 
deployment, and builds public-private partnerships, in the U.S. and 
other countries.
    The Alliance for Water Efficiency is a stakeholder-based 501(c)(3) 
non-profit organization dedicated to the efficient and sustainable use 
of water, with 317 member organizations from water utilities, 
government agencies, businesses, industry, plumbing, appliance and 
irrigation manufacturers, retailers, environmental and energy 
efficiency advocates, and other stakeholders. Located in Chicago, the 
Alliance serves as a North American advocate for water efficient 
products and programs, and provides information and assistance on water 
conservation efforts.
    The Appliance Standards Awareness Project (ASAP) is a coalition 
group dedicated to advancing cost-effective energy efficiency standards 
for appliances and equipment. ASAP works at both the state and federal 
levels and is led by a Steering Committee with representatives from 
consumer groups, utilities, state government, environmental groups, and 
energy-efficiency groups.
    The Consumer Federation of America is an association of nearly 300 
nonprofit consumer groups that was established in 1968 to advance the 
consumer interest through research, advocacy, and education.
    The National Consumer Law Center[supreg], a nonprofit corporation 
founded in 1969, assists consumers, advocates, and public policy makers 
nationwide on consumer law issues. NCLC works toward the goal of 
consumer justice and fair treatment, particularly for those whose 
poverty renders them powerless to demand accountability from the 
economic marketplace. NCLC has provided model language and testimony on 
numerous consumer law issues before federal and state policy makers. 
NCLC publishes an 18-volume series of treatises on consumer law, and a 
number of publications for consumers.
    The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) is a national 
environmental advocacy organization with over 1.3 million members and 
online activists. NRDC has spent decades working to build and improve 
DOE's federal appliance standards programs because of the important 
energy, environmental, consumer, and reliability benefits of appliance 
efficiency standards. NRDC participated in the enactment of the first 
federal legislation establishing efficiency standards, and has been 
active in all significant rulemakings since then.
    Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships (NEEP) is a non-profit 
organization that facilitates regional partnerships to advance the 
efficient use of energy in homes, buildings and industry in the 
Northeast U.S. NEEP works to leverage knowledge, capability, learning 
and funding through regionally coordinated policies, programs and 
practices. As a regional organization that collaborates with policy 
makers, energy efficient program administrators, and business, NEEP is 
a leader in the movement to build a cleaner environment and a more 
reliable and affordable energy system.
    The Northwest Power and Conservation Council is an interstate 
compact between the states of Idaho, Montana, Oregon and Washington 
authorized by the Northwest Power Act of 1980 (PL96-501). The Council 
is charged with ensuring that the Northwest's electric power system 
will provide adequate and reliable energy at the lowest economic and 
environmental cost to its citizens.
    Other supporters include the California Energy Commission, Demand 
Response and Smart Grid Coalition, and Earthjustice.

III. Background

    DOE proposed to amend DOE's test procedure for clothes dryers to 
incorporate the individual test procedures for timer dryers and 
automatic termination control dryers in AS/NSZ Standard 2442 with a few 
modifications. DOE sought comment on the adequacy of AS/NSZ Standard 
2442, along with proposed definitions and clarifications, to measure 
energy consumption for timer and automatic termination control clothes 
dryers to account for over-drying energy consumption. The Joint 
Commenters supported DOE's proposal to account for the effectiveness of 
automatic termination controls because it would have provided an 
incentive to

[[Page 62646]]

manufacturers to design products that avoid over-drying. Although the 
Joint Stakeholders generally promote harmonization with international 
standards, the Joint Stakeholders did not agree that AS/NSZ Standard 
2442 provided the best methods and procedures to account for the amount 
of over- drying associated with automatic termination control dryers 
beyond a specified RMC.
    Instead, the Joint Stakeholders proposed that the procedure should 
be to test the full cycle, including cool-down. This procedure is more 
representative of consumer usage because it includes all of the energy 
use in a cycle. It is also reproducible and repeatable because it does 
not require any ``guesswork'' as to when the cool-down will begin. On 
the other hand, DOE's original proposal to stop the dryer when the 
heater switches off for the final time at the end of the drying cycle, 
i.e., immediately before the cool-down period begins, entails some 
guesswork that introduces variability into the test. The procedure the 
Joint Stakeholders' proposed is also less burdensome because it does 
not require the manufacturers to conduct multiple tests in order to 
determine the point immediately before cool-down for each model. Thus, 
the Joint Stakeholders argued that their proposal improved upon DOE's 
proposal in addressing over-drying by including cool-down.
    Furthermore, for dryers that have both an automatic termination 
control cycle and a timer cycle, the Joint Stakeholders argued that 
only the automatic termination cycle should be tested.
    Finally, the Joint Stakeholders argued that if DOE adopted the 
Joint Stakeholders' proposed test procedure, i.e., to test the full 
cycle including cool-down, it must also revise the relevant energy 
conservation standards to reflect the new test procedure, ensuring that 
for dryers with effective automatic termination controls, there is no 
change in the stringency of the standards, per section 323 of the 
Energy Policy and Conservation Act. Specifically, the Joint 
Stakeholders argued, the procedures in section 323(e)(2) should be 
used, with the clarification that for the purposes of establishing a 
representative sample of products, DOE should choose a sample of 
minimally compliant dryers which automatically terminate the drying 
cycle at no less than four percent RMC.
    In the final test procedure, DOE declined to adopt the amendments 
it had proposed with regard to automatic termination controls (with or 
without the modifications proposed by the Joint Stakeholders). DOE 
determined, based on test results, that

given the load specified in the current DOE test procedure, the 
proposed automatic cycle termination control procedures may not 
adequately measure clothes dryer performance * * *. DOE believes that, 
although automatic termination control dryers may be measured as having 
a lower efficiency than a comparable dryer with only time termination 
control if tested according to the proposed test procedure, automatic 
termination control dryers may in fact be drying the clothing to 
approximately 5-percent RMC in real world use. DOE believes that 
automatic termination control dryers reduce energy consumption (by 
reducing over-drying) compared to timer dryers based on analysis of the 
AHAM field use survey and analysis of the field test data conducted by 
NIST. (76 Fed. Reg. 972, 1000 (Jan. 6, 2011)).

    DOE also stated that if data were available to develop a test 
procedure that accurately measures the energy consumption of clothes 
dryers equipped with automatic termination controls, it could consider 
revised amendments to the test procedure. (Id.).

IV. Proposal

    The Joint Stakeholders now present data to assist in the 
development of a test procedure that accurately measures the energy 
consumption of clothes dryers equipped with automatic termination 
controls, and request that DOE amend the clothes dryer test procedure 
to include procedures to account for automatic termination controls.
    DOE was concerned that the proposed test procedure may not properly 
measure the effectiveness of automatic termination controls, 
particularly in light of data that suggested that automatic termination 
control dryers may in fact be drying clothing to approximately five 
percent remaining moisture content (RMC) in the real world. The Joint 
Stakeholders determined that the best way to address DOE's concern was 
to account for the fact that the test procedure has inherent 
differences from consumer use that are necessary for repeatability and 
reproducibility. The most significant difference between the test 
procedure and consumer use is the DOE test cloth, which does not 
represent a variety of cloth used by consumers. The DOE test cloth is 
uniform, whereas a consumer load contains items of varying weights, 
composition, and size. Thus, the DOE test cloth likely dries faster and 
more uniformly than an actual consumer load.
    AHAM members conducted testing on clothes dryers with automatic 
termination controls that are currently on the market--the clothes 
dryers tested represent about 60 percent of shipments. Because there 
are few consumer complaints that clothes dryers equipped with automatic 
termination controls do not dry clothes, the testing assumed that the 
current market ending RMC is appropriate. The testing was conducted per 
the following conditions which closely approximated DOE's proposed test 
procedure, except that the entire cycle was tested, including cool-
down:
     Test procedure: Existing DOE test procedure, not including 
most recent amendments.
     Starting RMC: 70%  3.5%.
     Test load: DOE load.
     Test runs: Three tests on each machine, average ending RMC 
reported to AHAM.
     Program: A ``normal'' program (cycle) shall be selected. 
Where the dryness level can be chosen independently of the program, the 
``normal'' level shall be selected. Where the drying temperature 
(setting) can be chosen independently of the program, it shall be set 
to the maximum.
     Tests were run until the automatic termination controls 
stopped the clothes dryer (i.e., cool-down was included).
     Data was de-identified and aggregated by AHAM.
    The test results, shown in Table 1, demonstrated that an ending RMC 
of two percent using the DOE test cloth best approximates the maximum, 
consumer accepted, ending RMC.

[[Page 62647]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP11OC11.007

    Based on this data, the Joint Stakeholders request that DOE adopt 
the test procedure amendments it previously proposed except that it 
should modify the proposal to state that testing will include the full 
cycle, including cool-down. As the Joint Stakeholders previously 
commented, and is discussed in more detail in Section III above, 
testing the entire cycle including cool-down is more representative of 
actual consumer use and is less of a test burden for manufacturers than 
DOE's original proposal to stop the dryer when the heater switches off 
for the final time at the end of the drying cycle. In addition, DOE 
should modify its original proposal to state that ending RMC when 
testing units equipped with automatic termination controls shall be no 
more than two percent when testing with the DOE test load. That maximum 
percentage, according to the data above, is representative of clothes 
dryers currently on the market. Consistent with DOE's proposal, but 
substituting two percent ending RMC for five percent ending RMC, any 
test cycle in which the final RMC is two percent or less should be 
considered valid. If the final RMC is greater than two percent, the 
test would be invalid and a new run would be conducted using the 
highest dryness level setting.

V. Revision of Standards

    If DOE adopts the Joint Stakeholders' proposals in this petition, 
which would test the full cycle, including cool-down, and result in a 
change in measured energy, it must also revise the relevant energy 
conservation standards to reflect the new test procedure, ensuring that 
for dryers with effective automatic termination controls, there is no 
change in the stringency of the standards, per section 323 of the 
Energy Policy and Conservation Act. Specifically, the procedures in 
section 323(e)(2) should be used, with the clarification that for the 
purposes of establishing a representative sample of products, DOE 
should choose a sample of minimally compliant dryers which 
automatically terminate the drying cycle at 1.5 to 2 percent RMC. By 
selecting products that terminate at 1.5 to 2 percent, DOE will assure 
that the revised standard is based upon dryers which do not over-dry. 
This approach will also assure that the tested sample yields valid 
results under both the current and proposed revised test procedure.
    We note that in the test procedures SNOPR, DOE stated that for the 
purposes of determining the effects of an amended test procedure on the 
measured efficiency of clothes dryers, the measurement of only clothes 
dryers that terminate the drying cycle at no less than a particular RMC 
would not constitute a representative sample.\3\ If DOE continues to 
hold this view, the test procedure proposal in this petition should 
still be adopted. In that case, DOE could revise the standards without 
limiting the representative sample of dryers based on automatic 
termination performance. As described in the next section, that 
alternate approach would reduce, but not eliminate, the benefits from 
this test procedure change and, therefore, we urge DOE to reconsider 
its position.

    \3\ 76 Fed. Reg. 1026 (January 6, 2011).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VI. Energy Savings Potential

    If DOE adopts the Joint Stakeholders' proposals in this petition, 
manufacturers will have an incentive to refine their automatic 
termination feature to terminate very close to two percent maximum 
ending RMC using the DOE test load. As Figure 1 demonstrates, a large 
percentage of clothes dryers currently on the market dry to levels 
below the proposed two percent ending RMC. As manufacturers make these 
refinements, two things will happen--the measured energy efficiency of 
the dryer will improve and the ``real world'' energy consumption of the 
dryer will be reduced. This is exactly what should happen as the result 
of such a change in the test procedure towards conditions that more 
closely replicate consumer use.
    To estimate energy savings from the proposals for a test procedure 
amendment and a revision to the standards presented in this petition, 
we assume that the AHAM test load is representative of consumer loads. 
The DOE test data presented in the test procedures SNOPR showed that 
the maximum ending RMC using the

[[Page 62648]]

AHAM test load was five percent.\4\ As noted above, the AHAM test data 
suggest that an ending RMC of two percent using the DOE test load best 
approximates the maximum, consumer accepted, ending RMC. We assume that 
an ending RMC of two percent with the DOE test load translates to an 
ending RMC of five percent using the AHAM test load, and we also assume 
that the average ending RMC using the DOE test load translates to the 
average ending RMC using the AHAM test load. The SNOPR data showed that 
the average over-drying energy consumption (i.e. energy consumed after 
the dryer reaches an RMC of five percent) using the AHAM test load 
based on the four models tested with a ``normal cycle'' and ``normal 
dryness'' was 0.18 kWh per cycle.\5\ Based on this data, we estimate 
that a test procedure change and a revision to the standards as 
proposed in this petition would result in average per-unit energy 
savings of 0.18 kWh per cycle, or 51 kWh per year, and cumulative 
national energy savings of approximately 1.1 quads over 30 years.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 75 Fed. Reg. 37618 (June 29, 2010).
    \5\ Reich, Judith. Navigant Consulting, Inc. 2010. Personal 
communication to Joanna Mauer. June 22, 2010.
    \6\ Per-unit annual energy savings based on 283 cycles per year. 
Cumulative national energy savings calculated using the affected 
stock values and heat rates from the DOE NIA spreadsheet.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If DOE determines that it cannot limit the representative sample to 
dryers that terminate within a 1.5 to 2 percent RMC range for purposes 
of revising the standard levels, national energy savings would be 
reduced, but significant savings would still be achieved. Dryers with 
automatic termination controls that perform worse than average would 
need to improve such that they consume no more energy than an average 
dryer. DOE noted in the test procedures SNOPR that there is an 
exponential trend in the plot of energy consumption as a function of 
RMC below an RMC of about five percent likely because it becomes more 
difficult to remove the lesser amounts of moisture remaining in the 
load.\7\ This exponential trend suggests that dryers that currently 
terminate at very low RMCs consume significant amounts of over-drying 
energy and that requiring dryers with poor automatic termination 
controls to improve such that they perform as well as an average dryer 
represents a significant savings opportunity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 75 FR 37618.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We recognize that there are significant uncertainties in estimating 
energy savings from the proposed test procedure in this petition. 
However, energy savings will certainly be achieved by encouraging use 
of better automatic termination controls to reduce over-drying energy 
consumption. In addition, an amended test procedure as proposed in this 
petition would capture all the energy use of a dryer cycle, which would 
better represent real-world dryer energy consumption and allow 
manufacturers more options for improving rated dryer efficiency.

VII. Timing

    We recommend that test procedure and standards revisions adopted in 
response to this petition take effect on January 1, 2015. Our goal is 
to have a single round of standards and test procedure changes take 
effect. Thus, these test procedure and related standards amendments 
would replace the final test procedure issued in January 2011 and the 
dryer standards contained in the Direct Final Rule issued in April 
2011.
    In order to give manufacturers adequate time to prepare for a 
revised test procedure and standards, we urge DOE to complete and 
finalize the test procedure and standards revisions as soon as 
possible, but no later than December 31, 2011. We suggest that DOE 
propose the modifications to the standards required by Section 323(e) 
in parallel to modifications to the test procedure. Parallel revisions 
to the test procedure and standards will provide stakeholders the 
clearest understanding of the impacts of the changes and enable the 
fastest resolution of the issues raised in this petition. The timing 
suggested in this petition is contingent on DOE providing adequate 
lead-in time for manufacturers to develop products that will comply 
with the revised standard per the revised test procedure that more 
effectively accounts for automatic termination controls. In order to 
provide adequate lead-in time, it is necessary that the test procedures 
and standards are completed and final no later than December 31, 2011.

VIII. Conclusion

    Because data is now available to support a test procedure that 
accurately measures the effectiveness of automatic termination 
controls, the Joint Commenters request that DOE amend the clothes dryer 
test procedure to account for the effectiveness of automatic 
termination controls as discussed in Section IV above. Such amendments 
to account for the effectiveness of automatic termination controls will 
help to prevent over-drying and will, thus, result in energy savings. 
If DOE adopts procedures to amend the test procedure to measure the 
effectiveness of automatic termination controls, it must also revise 
the relevant energy conservation standards to reflect the new test 
procedure, ensuring that for dryers with effective automatic 
termination controls, there is no change in the stringency of the 
standards, per section 323 of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act.

                           Joint Stakeholders
 
               Manufacturers                          Advocates
 
Kevin Messner                               Andrew deLaski
Vice President, Government Relations        Executive Director
Association of Home Appliance               Appliance Standards
 Manufacturers                               Awareness Project
 
                             On Behalf of--
Members of Major Appliance Division:
    Whirlpool                               American Council for an
                                             Energy-Efficient Economy
    General Electric                        Natural Resources Defense
                                             Council
    Electrolux                              Alliance to Save Energy
    LG Electronics                          Alliance for Water
                                             Efficiency
    Council BSH                             Northwest Power and
                                             Conservation
    Alliance Laundry                        Northeast Energy Efficiency
                                             Partnerships
    Viking Range                            Consumer Federation of
                                             America
    Sub-Zero                                National Consumer Law Center
    Wolf

[[Page 62649]]

 
    Friedrich
    A/C U-Line
    Samsung
    Sharp Electronics
    Miele
    Heat
    Controller
    AGA Marvel
    Brown Stove
    Haier
    Fagor
    America
    Airwell
    Group
    Arcelik Fisher & Paykel
    Scotsman Ice
    Indesit
    Kuppersbusch
    Kelon
    DeLonghi
 

[FR Doc. 2011-26169 Filed 10-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```