alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(4910-13-P) 

# reDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2010-0383; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-214-AD; Amendme 

## 1&3& 1- 39-**; AD2010-**-*(Y' 

# JDIO-/y-17 RIN 2120-AA64 1M-I- ~TI1oUS<Sll; 

# c..~ ~~T~II'bJ 0

1~IT1~LiilSl" 

# h

~ATe Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-100B, 

# b/2'110 I ROUTIN(, ,,'MIlOL 747-100B SUO, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-207F, 747-300, 747-400, 747SR, and 747S ,,~~- t Series Airplanes 

# I AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (t'AA). DOT. ACTION: Finalrule. SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) forcertain Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUO, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-4 unl'G \'••aoL 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes.This AD r~uires repetitivedetailed inspections of certain averwing intercostal webs, and related uwestigative and corrective actions If I Mn necessary. This AD results from reports of cracks inovenving intercostal webs. We are Isslllng this AD La detect and cOITectsuch cra+ng, which could grow and result in a severed i.ntercostal. If an intercostal is severed, Icracks could develop in the adjacent frame structure and skin, resulting in arapid loss ofcabin pressure. DATES: This AD is effective [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION INTHE FEDERAL REGISTER]. 0UT1s(; S\1>IBOL

~ITI••• LS:SIG The Director ofthe Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of n certain publication listed inthe AD as of [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE 0 ,",SY",BOL PUBLICATION [NTHE FEDERAL REGlSTER]. 

### ''"'=- ADDRESSES; For service information identified inthis AD, contact Boeing
... re I Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P. O. Box 3707, Me
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 91990 / May 24, 2021

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension of trading 

in the securities of Intelligent Cloud Resources, Inc. (ITLL) commencing at 9:30 a.m. EDT on 

May 25, 2021 and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on June 8, 2021.

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of the foregoing company due 

to a lack of current and accurate information about the company because it has not filed certain 

periodic reports with the Commission. This order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).

The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by this company.

Brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11, at 

the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered relating to the securities 

of the subject company unless and until the broker or dealer has strictly complied with all of the 

provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by the rule, it 

should refrain from entering quotations relating to the securities of this company that has been 

subject to the trading suspension until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is 

certain that all of its provisions have been met. Any broker or dealer with questions regarding

the rule should contact the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, DC 

at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of the rule,

the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action. 

If any broker, dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, they 

should immediately communicate it to the Delinquent Filings Branch of the Division of 

Enforcement at (202) 551-5466, or by e-mail at DelinquentFilings@sec.gov.
Order entered July 12, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00377-CV

YLDEFONSO M. AVILA, Appellant

V.

BAYLOR SCOTT AND WHITE, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-21-02232-E

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file his 

brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief received July 5, 2022 filed 

as of the date of this order.

We note the brief does not comply with the requirements of Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 38.1. Specifically, the brief does not include:

•a complete list of all parties to the trial court’s judgment or appealed 

order, and the names and addresses of all trial and appellate counsel;

•a table of contents with references to the pages of the brief;
•an index of authorities arranged alphabetically and indicating the 

pages of the brief where the authorities are cited;

•a concise statement of the nature of the case, the course of the 

proceedings, and the trial court’s disposition of the case, supported by 

record references;

•a concise statement of the issues presented for review;

•a concise, non-argumentative statement of the facts pertinent to the 

issues presented, supported by record references;

•a succinct, clear, and accurate statement of the arguments made in the 

body of the brief;

•a clear and concise argument for the contentions made, with 

appropriate citations to authorities and the record; and,

•a short conclusion that clearly states the nature of the relief sought. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.1(a)-(d), (f)-(j). Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file 

an amended brief that complies with rule 38.1 no later than July 22, 2022. We 

caution appellant that failure to comply may result in the appeal being dismissed

without further notice. See id. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c).

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 73012 / September 5, 2014

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-16017

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

 :

LINKBROKERS : ORDER APPOINTING

DERIVATIVES LLC : TAX ADMINISTRATOR

:

:

Respondent. :

____________________________________:

By order dated January 17, 2013, the Commission issued the “Omnibus Order 

Directing the Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that 

Establish Distribution Funds” (“Omnibus Order”), Rel. No. 34-68683, authorizing the 

Secretary to issue orders during calendar years 2013-2015 appointing, upon request by 

the Commission staff, Damasco and Associates LLP (“Damasco”), a certified public 

accounting firm located in Half Moon Bay, California, as tax administrator (“Tax 

Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund may incur 

tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department of 

the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On September 3, 2014, the Commission staff requested, pursuant to the 

Omnibus Order, the appointment of Damasco as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in 

the above-referenced proceeding. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Damasco, pursuant to and in accordance with the Omnibus 

Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced 

proceeding. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Lynn M. Powalski

Deputy Secretary
#### Thomas Cobham, Appellant, v. South Brooklyn Railway Company, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed,- with costs. No opinion. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 75551 / July 29, 2015

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-14909

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

 :

OPPENHEIMERFUNDS, INC. :

:

and : ORDER DIRECTING 

: DISBURSEMENT

OPPENHEIMERFUNDS : OF FAIR FUND

DISTRIBUTOR, INC., :

:

Respondents. :

____________________________________:

On December 18, 2013, pursuant to Rule 1103 of the Securities and Exchange 

Commission’s (“Commission”) Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 

C.F.R. § 201.1103, the Commission issued a Notice of Proposed Plan of Distribution 

and Opportunity for Comment (Exchange Act Rel. No. 71119 (December 18, 2013))

(“Notice”). The Notice advised interested parties that they could obtain a copy of the 

Proposed Plan of Distribution (“Proposed Plan”) from the Commission’s public 

website or by submitting a written request to Nancy Chase Burton, Esq., United States 

Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-5631. 

All persons who desired to comment on the Proposed Plan could submit their 

comments, in writing, no later than thirty (30) days from the date of the Notice. No 

comments were received, and subsequently, on February 5, 2014, the Commission 

issued an Order Approving Plan of Distribution (Exchange Act Rel. No. 71493 

(February 5, 2014)).
2

The Plan of Distribution (“Distribution Plan”) provides for the distribution of 

$35,366,896.00 paid by OppenheimerFunds, Inc., plus interest, less any amounts 

expended or to be expended for administering the Oppenheimer Fair Fund, to investors 

according to the methodology set forth in the Distribution Plan. Pursuant to the 

Distribution Plan, the Fund Administrator has submitted a payment file to the 

Commission staff with a reasonable assurance letter as to the completeness and 

accuracy of the information contained therein. The staff has reviewed this material. 

Pursuant to Rule 1101(b)(6) of the Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and 

Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(b)(6), the Commission staff requests that 

the Commission authorize the disbursement of $34,427,424.90 to Huntington Bank to 

be distributed to investors in accordance with the Distribution Plan. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, that Commission staff shall disburse

$34,427,424.90 of the Fair Fund to Huntington National Bank, and that the Fund 

Administrator shall distribute such monies to investors as provided for in the 

Distribution Plan. 

By the Commission. 

Brent J. Fields

Secretary
### §460v–1. Administration, protection, and development by Secretary of Agriculture; administration of land or waters for Colorado River storage project by Secretary of the Interior

The administration, protection, and development of the recreation area shall be by the Secretary of Agriculture (hereinafter called the "Secretary") in accordance with the laws, rules, and regulations applicable to national forests, in a manner coordinated with the other purposes of the Colorado River storage project, and in such manner as in his judgment will best provide for (1) public outdoor recreation benefits; (2) conservation of scenic, scientific, historic, and other values contributing to public enjoyment; and (3) such management, utilization, and disposal of natural resources as in his judgment will promote or are compatible with, and do not significantly impair the purposes for which the recreation area is established: Provided, That lands or waters needed or used for the operation of the Colorado River storage project shall continue to be administered by the Secretary of the Interior to the extent he determines to be required for such operation.

(Pub. L. 90–540, §2, Oct. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 904.)
Docket Number: EP A-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329



## REGULATORY SUPPORT for the FINAL AMENDMENTS:

Assessment of Potential Costs, Ben efits, Environmental Justice, and
Other Impacts; and Regulatory Fl exibility Screening Assessment

Final Amendments to the Id entification of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials That Are Solid Waste – Final Rule (76 FR 15456, et seq), March 21, 2011.

================================ ============================

EPA is finalizing amendments to 40 CFR Part 241, which was codified by the NonHazardous Secondary Materials (NHSM) final rule (76 FR 15456, et seq), originally
promulgated on March 21, 2011. The necessary regulatory support documents for this action

that address all relevant statutes and Executive Or ders are located in the following EPA Dockets:

i) Commercial/Industrial Solid Waste Incinera tors (CISWI), identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0119, ii) Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters: (1) Major source rule, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0058 (2) Area source rule, identified by Do cket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0790

Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review
and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

Assessment of Potential Costs, Benefits, Environmental Justice, and Other Impacts

The final amendments to the March 21, 2011 NHSM final rule are intended to clarify several provisions in 40 CFR Part 241, which provides the standards and procedures for identifying whether non-hazardous secondary mate rials (NHSM) are solid waste when used as fuels or ingredients in combustion units. As su ch, this final action alone will not result in any costs, benefits, environmenta l justice, or other impact s to the regulated community 1 or the government. The NHSM part of the rule itself does not include any emission standards and does not require changes in the management or us e of secondary materials. Only with the promulgation of the final CISWI and major source boiler rules would soci ety realize any costs, benefits, environmental justice, or other impacts.

1 Aside from negligible administrative costs (e .g., reading the RCRA pa rt of the proposal).Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
as amended by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
Regulatory Flexibility Screening Assessment

The final NHSM amendments will not impose requirements 2 on any small entities apart from those that become effective in conjuncti on with the promulgation of the final CISWI and

boiler rules. No small entities are directly regulated by the fi nal NHSM amendments. As such, any potential impacts to small entities in aff ected sectors are addressed in the regulatory flexibility analyses prepared in support of the CISWI and boiler rules, as referenced under point

ii above.

Paperwork Reduction Act Information Collection Request (ICR)

This final action will result in no aggreg ate incremental impact to the information collection cost and hour burden estimates, as presented in OMB approved ICR No. 2382.03.

Revised June 26, 2012

2 Aside from negligible administrative costs (e .g., reading the RCRA pa rt of the proposal).
### §667g–1. Requisition and use of grain for prevention of starvation of migratory birds; reimbursement for packaging and transporting

Upon a finding by the Secretary of the Interior that migratory birds are threatened with starvation in any area of the United States, the Secretary is authorized to requisition from the Commodity Credit Corporation grain acquired by that Corporation through price support operations in such quantities as may be mutually agreed upon. The Corporation shall be reimbursed by the Secretary for its expense in packaging and transporting of such grain for purposes of sections 667g to 667g–2 of this title.

(Pub. L. 87–152, §2, Aug. 17, 1961, 75 Stat. 389.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 448 of Title 7, Agriculture, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE03505

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBeam Wave Considerations for Optical Link Budget CalculationsThe bounded beam wave nature of electromagnetic radiation emanating from a finite size aperture is considered for diffraction-based link power budget calculations for an optical communications system. Unlike at radio frequency wavelengths, diffraction effects are very important at optical wavelengths. In the general case, the situation cannot be modeled by supposing isotropic radiating antennas and employing the concept of effective isotropic radiated power. It is shown here, however, that these considerations are no more difficult to treat than spherical-wave isotopic based calculations. From first principles, a general expression governing the power transfer for a collimated beam wave is derived and from this are defined the three regions of near-field, first Fresnel zone, and far-field behavior. Corresponding equations for the power transfer are given for each region. It is shown that although the well-known linear expressions for power transfer in the far-field hold for all distances between source and receiver in the radio frequency case, nonlinear behavior within the first Fresnel zone must be accounted for in the optical case at 1550 nm with typical aperture sizes at source/receiver separations less that 100 km.Document ID20160011505Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsManning, Robert M.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 27, 2016Publication DateSeptember 1, 2016Subject CategoryOpticsGeneralReport/Patent NumberGRC-E-DAA-TN32230NASA/TM-2016-219120E-19244Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 405034.04.02.01.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsWave PropagationLink Power BudgetsAvailable DownloadsNameType20160011505.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §715h. Operation of State game laws

Nothing in this subchapter is intended to interfere with the operation of the game laws of the several States applying to migratory game birds insofar as they do not permit what is forbidden by Federal law.

(Feb. 18, 1929, ch. 257, §9, 45 Stat. 1224.)
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1689/2005

of 14 October 2005         

fixing the depreciation coefficients to be applied when agricultural products are bought in, for the 2006 financial year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1883/78 of 2 August 1978 laying down general rules for the financing of interventions by the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, Guarantee Section (1), and in particular the second sentence of Article 8(1)

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In respect of the products listed in the Annex which, having been bought in by public intervention, have entered store or been taken over by the intervention agencies between 1 October 2005 and 30 September 2006, the intervention agencies shall apply, to the value of the products bought in every month, the coefficients set out in the Annex.

Article 2

The expenditure amounts, calculated by taking account of the depreciation referred to in Article 1 shall be notified to the Commission under the declarations established pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 296/96 (2).

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall apply from 1 October 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 October 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 216, 5.8.1978, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 695/2005 (OJ L 114, 4.5.2005, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 39, 17.2.1996, p. 5. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1607/2005 (OJ L 256, 1.10.2005, p. 12).

----

ANNEX

Depreciation coefficients to be applied to the monthly buying-in values

----
### §4213. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 100–478, title II, §2103, Oct. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 2317, which required the Secretary of the Interior to submit an annual report to Congress regarding the African Elephant Conservation Fund formerly established by section 4212 of this title and the status of the African elephant, terminated, effective May 15, 2000, pursuant to section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance. See, also, page 107 of House Document No. 103–7.
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 10.46



[LOGO] HEALTHGATE(R) DATA CORP.                    25 Corporate Drive, Suite 310
                                                   Burlington, MA 01803

                                                   TEL: (781) 685-4000
                                                   FAX: (781) 685-4040
                                                   http://www.healthgate.com


January 19, 2000

Mr. Ian Bannerman
Blackwell Science Ltd
Osney Mead
Oxford, OX2 0EL
United Kingdom

Dear Ian,

Pursuant to our conversations to date, HealthGate agrees to offer Blackwell
Science a 10% discount on the outstanding balance of the estimated total fees
for our activePress Journal Hosting and Delivery Agreement for the year 2000.
Estimated total fees for the year 2000 are US$805,500. Your fees paid to date
total US$249,125.

Therefore, Blackwell Science agrees to pay HealthGate the sum of US$556,375.00
on Friday, 21 January, 2000. This sum is an advance payment on the remaining
Software Maintenance, Content Conversion, Site Maintenance and Content Storage
fees relating to 2000, described in the activePress Journal Hosting and Delivery
Agreement, effective as of 1 January 2000.

HealthGate agrees to credit Blackwell Science with an early settlement discount
of US$55,637.50, representing 10% of the estimated total fees for Software
Maintenance, Content Conversion, Site Maintenance and Content Storage in 2000.

The balance of fees for Software Maintenance, Content Conversion, Site
Maintenance and Content Storage will be reviewed quarterly and HealthGate will
issue a statement of account to Blackwell Science effective 1 April 2000, 1 July
2000 and 1 October 2000. Any outstanding balance will be settled quarterly. If
there is an underpayment, then HealthGate will invoice any additional fees
(provided for in the activePress agreement), if any, quarterly. Any overpayment
will be credited to Blackwell Science quarterly.

All other terms and conditions from the activePress Journal Hosting and Delivery
Agreement still apply, unless waived in writing by both parties as provided for
the Agreement.

Please acknowledge the terms for early payment by signing below. We look forward
to working with you in the coming year.

Sincerely,

/s/ Rick Lawson

Rick Lawson
Vice President

For Blackwell Science Ltd.



/s/ Ian Bannerman
-------------------------------------------
Ian Bannerman
Journal Sales Director



                                                        CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION