alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 5 

77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD 

CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590 

APR o 1 2010 

REPLY TO THE ATIENTION OF: 

Paul Eger 

Commissioner 

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 

520 Lafayette Road North 

Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155 

Dear Mr. Eger: 

R-19J 

RECEIVED 

APR 11.1 2010 

MPCA COMMISSIONERS 

OFFICE 

This letter is in response to your December 30, 2009, submission of the Minnesota 

Regional Haze Plan. You requested approval of the plan as a revision to your State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). 

We have preformed a completeness review on your submission considering the 

requirements of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's February 16, 1990 (55 FR 5824) 

completeness review procedures, as amended August 26, 1991 (26 FR 42216). The requirements 

of section 11 O(k) of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 were also taken into account. We 

have determined that this SIP submission satisfies the completeness criteria and have began to 

review your request. 

A finding of completeness merely indicates that the submission meets the criteria that any 

plan must satisfy for EPA to take rulemaking action on it. A completeness finding is not a 

finding on the merits of the plan or whether it meets EPA's SIP approval requirements. My staff 

is reviewing your submission and will determine if your plan satisfies the requirements of our 

Regional Haze Rule. 

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Cheryl L. 

Newton, Director ofthe Air and Radiation Division, at 312-353-2212. 

Sincerely, 

Acting 

2!.~~ Regional Administrator 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Recycled Paper (50% Postconsumer)
#### § 101.2 Presumption of lawful admission; entry under erroneous name or other errors.

An alien who entered the United States as either an immigrant or nonimmigrant under any of the following circumstances shall be regarded as having been lawfully admitted in such status, except as otherwise provided in this part: An alien otherwise admissible whose entry was made and recorded under other than his full true and correct name or whose entry record contains errors in recording sex, names of relatives, or names of foreign places of birth or residence, provided that he establishes by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that the record of the claimed admission relates to him, and, if entry occurred on or after May 22, 1918, if under other than his full, true and correct name that he also establishes that the name was not adopted for the purpose of concealing his identity when obtaining a passport or visa, or for the purpose of using the passport or visa of another person or otherwise evading any provision of the immigration laws, and that the name used at the time of entry was one by which he had been known for a sufficient length of time prior to making application for a passport or visa to have permitted the issuing authority or authorities to have made any necessary investigation concerning him or that his true identity was known to such officials.

[32 FR 9622, July 4, 1967]
HUD's Section 3
Business Registry

ae
=

mi ; _ |_|

tye 4

Pees A cea

f SaeeA S=

www/hud.gov/sec3biz

To order additional copies, reference publication number: HUD-9872-FHEO
United States Department of Agriculture USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Dig In! • Grades 5-6 • http://teamnutrition.usda.gov

86

Name: ____________________________________________ Date: _______________

Fuel your day with fruit at breakfast! Try some of these tasty ideas:

• Add chopped apples, dried fruits, chopped nuts, and a little brown sugar to plain oatmeal.

• Top a whole-grain waffle with low-fat yogurt and berries. 

• Spread peanut butter on a whole-wheat tortilla. Top it with fruit and a grated carrot, then roll it up. 

• Top whole-grain bread with low-fat cheddar cheese and apple slices. Ask your parents to toast it in the oven.

• Blend low-fat yogurt, fruit, and ice in a blender for a quick smoothie.

Power up with fruit as a snack. Try the following ideas:

• Create your own cereal snack mix with whole-grain cereal, dried fruits, and nuts.

• Enjoy orange wedges after sports practice.

• Dip fruits into low-fat vanilla yogurt.

• Make popsicles out of low-fat yogurt and fruit.

Make your own fruit treat! Work with a partner and 

follow the recipe below to make a yummy breakfast 

or power snack. Don’t forget to wash your hands first!

 LESSON 8 HANDOUT 2 Fabulous Fruit 

Recipe

Breakfast Sundae 

Ingredients:

• 2 cups low-fat granola cereal

• 1 cup low-fat yogurt

• 1 cup fruit, chopped

Directions: 

1. Use a measuring cup to measure out the ingredients and place each 

in a separate bowl. 

2. Using a spoon, layer the granola, yogurt, and fruit into 2 plastic cups. 

3. Get creative! Alternate colors. Try a variety of fruits.

4. Refrigerate or enjoy right away.

Preparation Time: 10 MInutes

Serves: 2

Serving Size: 8 oz

Supplies:

• 1 tablespoon

• measuring cup

• 3 bowls 

• 2 8-oz clear cups
**Exhibit32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with thequarterly report of The SCO Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q, for thethree and six months ended April 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bert B. Young, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Bert B. Young       |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Bert B. Young           |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 
| Date: | October 26, 2005 |
|-------|-----------------------|

** **

----
#### § 81.1 Purpose.

The regulations in this subpart designate the agencies that are authorized to receive and investigate reports of child abuse under the provisions of section 226 of the Victims of Child Abuse Act of 1990, Public Law 101-647, 104 Stat. 4806, codified at 42 U.S.C. 13031.

[Order No. 2009-96, 61 FR 7706, Feb. 29, 1996, as amended by Order No. 2692-2003, 68 FR 62372, Nov. 4, 2003]
§ 57.2 Responsibility for the conduct of investigations. ( a ) When an instance of alleged “discrimination” in violation of section 816(b)(1) of the Act is referred to the Department of Justice by the Department of Defense, the matter shall be assigned initially to the Civil Division.
( b ) ( 1 ) If the information provided by the Department of Defense indicates that a non-criminal violation may have occurred and further investigation is warranted, such investigation shall be conducted under the supervision of the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Civil Division.
( 2 ) If the information provided by the Department of Defense indicates that a criminal violation under section 816(f) of the Act may have occurred, the Civil Division shall refer the matter to the Criminal Division. If it is determined that further investigation of a possible criminal violation is warranted, such investigation shall be conducted under the supervision of the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Criminal Division.
( 3 ) If a referral from the Department of Defense is such that both civil and criminal proceedings may be warranted, responsibility for any further investigation may be determined by the Deputy Attorney General.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Federal Reserve Structure and the Development of Monetary Policy: 1915-1935

              																	D'Arista, Jane W.					 and 	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking and Currency. Subcommittee on Domestic Finance, 1964-1975. 						*Federal Reserve Structure and the Development of Monetary Policy: 1915-1935*,										December 1971,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/728,			accessed on September 18, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
§ 543.16 Other paralegals, clerks, and legal assistants. ( a ) The Bureau of Prisons recognizes the use of assistants by attorneys to perform legal tasks and, with proper controls and exceptions enumerated in this section and in part 540 of this chapter, accords such assistants the same status as attorneys with respect to visiting and correspondence.
( b ) The attorney who employs an assistant and who wishes the assistant to visit or correspond with an inmate on legal matters shall provide the Warden with a signed statement including: ( 1 ) Certification of the assistant's ability to perform in this role and awareness of the responsibility of this position;
( 2 ) A pledge to supervise the assistant's activities; and
( 3 ) Acceptance of personal and professional responsibility for all acts of the assistant which may affect the institution, its inmates, and staff. The Warden may require each assistant to fill out and sign a personal history statement and a pledge to abide by Bureau regulations and institution guidelines. If necessary to maintain security or good order in the institution, the Warden may prohibit a legal assistant from visiting or corresponding with an inmate.
1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 71825 / March 27, 2014

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-15507

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

 :

JPMorgan Chase & Co., : ORDER APPOINTING FUND PLAN

 : ADMINISTRATOR AND SETTING

Respondent. : ADMINISTRATOR BOND AMOUNT

 : 

____________________________________:

On September 19, 2013, the Commission entered an order against JPMorgan Chase & Co. 

(“JPMorgan”) finding that JPMorgan violated the federal securities laws when it made material 

misstatements in filings with the Commission, failing to accurately disclose losses in the first 

quarter of 2012 on a timely basis and failing to disclose that its disclosure controls and procedures 

were ineffective.1 Pursuant to the Order, the Commission imposed sanctions, including a ceaseand-desist order and requiring JPMorgan to pay a civil penalty in the amount of $200,000,000 to 

the Commission. This payment was made on September 19, 2013. 

On March 5, 2014, the Commission entered an order establishing a Fair Fund for the 

purpose of distributing the civil penalty back to injured investors.2

The Division of Enforcement now seeks the appointment of RCB Fund Services, LLC 

(“RCB”) as the fund plan administrator and requests that the administrator’s bond be set at 

$200,000,000, as required by Rules 1105(a) and 1105(c) of the Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund 

 1 See Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 

1934, Making Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”), Exchange Act Rel. No. 70458 (Sept. 

19, 2013). 2 See Order Establishing a Fair Fund, Exchange Act Rel. No. 71654 (Mar. 5, 2014).
2

and Disgorgement Plans (“Rules”).3 RCB is included in the Commission’s approved pool of 

administrators.

Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 1105(a), it is hereby ORDERED that RCB is appointed as the 

fund plan administrator and shall obtain a bond in accordance with Rule 1105(c) in the amount of 

$200,000,000.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.4

Lynn M. Powalski

Deputy Secretary

 3 17 C.F.R. 201.1105(a) and 201.1105(c). 

4 17 C.F.R. 200.30-4(a)(17).
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.9

                 Amendment to Corporate Revolving and Term Loan
             Agreement with Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company
                             dated January 31, 2000


                                AMENDMENT NO. 6

                                       TO

                  CORPORATE REVOLVING AND TERM LOAN AGREEMENT


         Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (the "Bank") and C. H. Heist
Corp. (the "Borrower") hereby agree as follows:

         1.       Loan Agreement. The Bank and the Borrower are parties to a
Corporate Revolving and Term Loan Agreement date December 23, 1993, and as
amended (the "Loan Agreement"). The Bank and the Borrower wish to amend the
Loan Agreement as set forth herein.

         2.       Amendment to Loan Agreement. The Bank and the Borrower hereby
agree that the Loan Agreement is amended as follows:

                  a.       Section 11.dd(i) of the Loan Agreement, as
                           previously amended, is modified so that the
                           reference to "August 1, 2000 is deleted and "August
                           1, 2001" is substituted in its place.

         3.       Except as expressly modified herein, the Loan Agreement
otherwise remains unchanged and the Borrower hereby ratifies and reaffirms the
Loan Agreement, as amended, and any other documents executed in connection
therewith, and agrees that the Loan Agreement and all documents executed in
connection herewith are in full force and effect and fully enforceable with
their terms and not subject to any offset, claim, counterclaim or defense.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No.
6 to be duly executed by their authorized officers as of the 31st day of
January, 2000.

C.H. HEIST CORP.                               MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS
                                               TRUST COMPANY


By:  /s/ Mark P. Kashmanian                    By: /s/ Kevin B. Quinn
   ---------------------------------              -----------------------------
         Mark P. Kashmanian                            Kevin B. Quinn
         Treasurer and                                 Assistant Vice President
         Chief Accounting Officer
### §539l–3. Loop trail study; authorization

#### (a) Study

Not later than three years after funds are first made available for this purpose, the Secretary, in consultation with interested parties, shall complete a study of the suitability and feasibility of establishing, consistent with the purpose set forth in section 539l(a)(2) of this title, a loop trail for mechanized and other nonmotorized recreation connecting the trail designated as "Rogers Pass" and the trail designated as "Rollins Pass Road".

#### (b) Establishment

If the results of the study required by subsection (a) indicate that establishment of such a loop trail would be suitable and feasible, consistent with the purpose set forth in section 539l(a)(2) of this title, the Secretary shall establish the loop trail in a manner consistent with that purpose.

(Pub. L. 107–216, §6, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1060.)
#### § 636.404 Can a competitive range be used to limit competition?

If the solicitation notifies offerors that the competitive range can be limited for purposes of efficiency, you may limit the number of proposals to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition. However, you must provide written notice to any offeror whose proposal is no longer considered to be included in the competitive range. Offerors excluded or otherwise eliminated from the competitive range may request a debriefing. Debriefings may be conducted in accordance with your procedures as long as you comply with § 636.514.
United States Bankruptcy Court

Eastern District of Virginia

Richmond Division

701 East Broad Street

Richmond, VA 23219

Case Number 16−31080−KLP

Chapter 13

Judge Keith L. Phillips

In re: Debtor(s) (name(s) used by the debtor(s) in the last 8 years, including married, maiden, trade, and address):

Melissa Haydon Gagnon

 404 Tasewell Ave.

Colonial Heights, VA 23834

Last four digits of Social−Security or Individual Taxpayer−Identification (ITIN) No(s).,(if any):

Debtor: xxx−xx−2127

Employer Tax−Identification (EIN) No(s).(if any):

Debtor: NA

 NOTICE OF FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

To: Moving or Prevailing Party

 Upon a review of the above referenced case, or adversary proceeding, it appears that the parties may not be

diligently prosecuting the following matter:

10 − Amended/Modified Chapter 13 Plan and Related Motions (Re: related document(s)2 Chapter 13 Plan and

Related Motions filed by Melissa Haydon Gagnon) filed by Rudolph C. McCollum Jr. on behalf of Melissa

Haydon Gagnon. Confirmation Hearing to be held on 4/27/2016 at 09:10 AM at Judge Phillips' Courtroom, 701 E.

Broad St., Rm. 5100, Richmond, Virginia. Objections to Plan due by 4/20/2016. (McCollum, Rudolph)

 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that unless there is some disposition made of this matter within fourteen (14)

days from the date of this notice, or unless cause is shown, in writing, why no action has been taken, an order will

be entered dismissing this matter for failure to prosecute to a conclusion.

Date: September 28, 2016

[ntcfailprosvJuly2013.jsp]

William C. Redden , Clerk

United States Bankruptcy Court

By /s/ Nathaniel Bullock

Deputy Clerk

Case 16-31080-KLP Doc 16 Filed 09/28/16 Entered 09/28/16 11:19:01 Desc Ntc of

 Failure to Prosecute Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlos Reyes, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 261]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert L. Cohen, J.), rendered March 20, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 1 to 3 years concurrent with a term of one year for violation of probation, unanimously affirmed.

By making generalized objections, and by failing to request any further relief after the court sustained his objection, defendant failed to preserve any of his present challenges to remarks made by the assistant district attorney during voir dire of prospective jurors, opening statement and summation, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find no basis for reversal *(see People v Overlee,*236 AD2d 133 [1997], *lv denied*91 NY2d 976 [1998]; *People v D’Alessandro,*184 AD2d 114, 118-119 [1992], *lv denied*81 NY2d 884 [1993]). Concur—Friedman, J.E, Williams, Gonzalez, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.
EX-31.2            RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION OF CIARAN EGAN

                   RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Ciaran Egan, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of
FreeStar Technology Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report; and

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report.

Dated: March 25, 2004                  By: /s/  Ciaran Egan
                                       Ciaran, Chief Financial Officer
#### Harry J. Renn, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

“Ho opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 71558 / February 18, 2014

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-15654

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

 :

G-TRADE SERVICES LLC, :

CONVERGEX GLOBAL MARKETS : EXTENSION ORDER

LIMITED, and CONVERGEX :

EXECUTION SOLUTIONS LLC :

:

Respondents. :

____________________________________:

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested a sixty-day extension of time 

until April 21, 2014 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution under Rule 1101(a) of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 CFR 201.1101(a).

On December 18, 2013, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Administrative 

and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 203(e) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Making 

Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”) against 

G-Trade Services LLC (“G-Trade”), ConvergEx Global Markets Limited (“CGM”), and 

ConvergEx Execution Solutions LLC (“CES”)1 (collectively, “Respondents”). The Order

required Respondents to pay a total of $107,424,429 in disgorgement, prejudgment interest,

and civil money penalties into an escrow account and created a Fair Fund pursuant to Section 

308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended. In two related proceedings, the 

Commission ordered that the disgorgement and prejudgment interest paid in those 

 1 Exchange Act Rel. No. 71128 (Dec. 18, 2013).
2

proceedings, totaling $1,228,592, may be combined with the funds paid in this matter for 

distribution to harmed customers.2 Payment was made into the escrow as required by the 

Order on December 17, 2013.

In its request for an extension of time, the Division states that additional time is needed 

to finalize the plan of distribution.

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s 

request for an extension of time until April 21, 2014 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution 

is granted.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority. 

Elizabeth M. Murphy

Secretary

 2 See In the Matter of Jonathan Samuel Daspin, Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-15652 (Exchange Act Rel. 

No. 71126 (Dec. 18, 2013)), and In the Matter of Thomas Lekargeren, Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-

15653 (Exchange Act Rel. No. 71127 (Dec. 18, 2013)).
Case 17-03206-KRH    Doc 4    Filed 04/21/17    Entered 04/21/17 15:33:04    Desc Main Document      Page 1 of 2

Case 17-03206-KRH    Doc 4    Filed 04/21/17    Entered 04/21/17 15:33:04    Desc Main Document      Page 2 of 2