alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# **EXHIBIT 32.2**

# ** **

**HerculesIncorporated**

 

# **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of HerculesIncorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Allen A. Spizzo, Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)     The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

(2)     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:  March 16, 2005

 

 
| /s/ Allen A. Spizzo                        | ** ** |
|--------------------------------------------|------------|
| Allen A. Spizzo                            |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,123
<ALLOWANCES>                                       373
<INVENTORY>                                      2,779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,010
<PP&E>                                           2,042
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,043
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,590
<BONDS>                                          3,002
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         19
<COMMON>                                            32
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,237
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,880
<SALES>                                         14,038
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,430
<CGS>                                           11,396
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,396
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   123
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 331
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (145)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (145)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (145)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)


</TABLE>
Vendor Amount of Transfer Check # Check Date Clear Date Debtor Tr

Fort Myer Construction Corp. $57,400.00 5434 4/25/2014 4/30/2014 Truland Systems C

$16,750.00 5579 5/16/2014 5/28/2014 Truland Systems C$24,030.18 5623 5/16/2014 5/28/2014 Truland Systems C

Total $98,180.18

Case 16-01103-BFK Doc 1-1 Filed 06/30/16 Entered 06/30/16 11:34:24 Des

 Exhibit A Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Regency Equities Corp. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Morris Engel, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

/s/ MORRIS ENGEL
Morris Engel
Chief Financial Officer
April 26, 2004
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 91571 / April 15, 2021

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20092

In the Matter of

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V.,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

On February 22, 2019, the Commission issued an Omnibus Order Directing the 

Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that Establish Distribution Funds 

(“Omnibus Order”)1 authorizing the Secretary2to issue orders for calendar years 2019-2021 

appointing, upon request by the Commission staff, Miller Kaplan Arase LLP (“Miller Kaplan”), a 

certified public accounting firm, with one of their offices located in San Francisco, California, as 

tax administrator (“Tax Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund 

may incur tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department 

of the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On April 13, 2021, the Commission staff requested, pursuant to the Omnibus Order, the 

appointment of Miller Kaplan as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced 

proceeding.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Miller Kaplan, pursuant to and in accordance with the 

Omnibus Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.3

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 85174 (Feb. 22, 2019).

2

 Effective December 29, 2020, the Director of the Division of Enforcement is now also authorized to make 

appointments in accordance with the Omnibus Order. See Delegation of Authority to Director of the Division of 

Enforcement, Securities Act Rel. No. 10900 (Dec. 10, 2020).

3

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(ii).
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of The SCO Group, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q, for the three months ended January 31, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Darl C. McBride, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Darl C. McBride                   |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Darl C. McBride                       |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                  |
|   |                                  |
| Date:  | March 16, 2004                   |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Passiona C. Culver, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 709]

Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), rendered September 9, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal mischief in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon a jury verdict of criminal mischief in the second degree (Penal Law § 145.10). The general motion to dismiss by defendant did not preserve for our review her contention concerning the alleged legal insufficiency of the evidence *(see People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]). In any event, the evidence is legally sufficient to establish that defendant damaged the vehicle at issue and that the damage to such vehicle exceeded $1,500 *(see generally People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Also contrary to defendant’s contention, the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see generally id.).*Present—Scudder, J.P., Martoche, Centra and Pine, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lewittes & Sons, Inc., Appellant.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.
### §544j. Old Columbia River Highway

The Oregon Department of Transportation shall, in consultation with the Secretary and the Commission, the State of Oregon and the counties and cities in which the Old Columbia River Highway is located, prepare a program and undertake efforts to preserve and restore the continuity and historic integrity of the remaining segments of the Old Columbia River Highway for public use as a Historic Road, including recreation trails to connect intact and usable segments.

(Pub. L. 99–663, §12, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4293.)
UAS PREFLIGHT INSPECTION

DJI F450 DJI NAZA MV-2 AUTOPILOT SYSTEM

AIRFRAME

1. Ensure arms and fasteners are securely mounted to the top and bottom body plates, and 

that there is no damage.

2. Ensure body plates are not damaged.

LANDING GEAR

1. Inspect Landing gear for wear or cracks.

2. Ensure Landing gear is securely fastened to the UAS.

PROPULSION SYSTEM

1. Inspect each electronic speed controller, ensure they are securely fastened to the UAS and 

that all connectors are correctly and securely connected to each motor.

2. Inspect all motors for damage and ensure they are securely mounted to each arm.

3. Inspect all propellers for nicks, cracks and wear.

RECEIVER AND AUTOPILOT SYSTEM

1. Inspect GPS module and make sure cable is connected to the PMU (power supply 

module).

2. Inspect PMU (power supply module) make sure all connections are secure.

3. Inspect the receiver and make sure all connections are secure.

4. Inspect the main controller and make sure all connections are secure.

5. Inspect Remote LED and make sure connection is secure.

POWER SOURCE

1. Ensure battery is fully charged.

1. Ensure battery is not swollen or has not been punctured. 

2. Ensure battery is securely mounted to the UAS.

GIMBAL AND CAMERA SYSTEM

1. Inspect the gimbal and gimbal mounting plate. Ensure the gimbal mounting plate is 

securely fastened to the UAS lower body plate.

2. Inspect the camera and ensure it is securely mounted to the gimbal.
<PAGE>

                                      EXHIBIT 23


                 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-41323 of Hawkins Chemical, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) on Form S-8 of
our report dated December 3, 1996 incorporated by reference in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the Company for the year ended September 29, 1996.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our
aforementioned report also included the financial statement schedule of the
Company listed in Item 14(a)(2).  This financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an
opinion based on our audits.  In our opinion, such financial statement schedule,
when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken
as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 20, 1996
1870 Cordell Court, Suite 202

El Cajon, CA 92020

P. (619) 258-3670

F. (619) 258-3674

www.eastcountyedc.org

San Diego East County Economic Development Council

March 16, 2012

The Honorable Ray LaHood

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Alaska Airlines’ application for SAN-DCA, Docket No. DOT-OST-2012-0029

Dear Secretary LaHood:

The East County Economic Development Council (East County EDC) supports the application of Alaska 

Airlines for air service between San Diego and Washington Reagan National Airport (DCA). San Diego 

is the largest region without direct service to DCA. Additionally, due to the profound community of 

interest between San Diego and the nation’s capital, the region generates the largest passenger 

market demand without nonstop service to the most convenient airport serving our nation’s capital. 

San Diego’s sheer market size to Washington coupled with the fact that San Diego-to-Dulles average 

airfares are the highest of west coast cities, should qualify it for the limited slots available for this flight. 

The high airfare is exacerbated when factoring in taxi fares from Dulles to Washington’s city center that 

average about $60 each way. This means travelers between Washington’s city center and San Diego via 

Dulles can pay on average close to $400 one-way. 

Since 2000, East County EDC has been the recipient of Department of Defense contracts and other 

Federal agency grants that have required trips to DC. The choice between the financial burden of airfare 

and ground transportation of a Dulles flight and the logistical burden of a less expensive flight to 

Baltimore-Washington International airport is a difficult one for a non-profit organization.

There are countless other San Diego-based and Washington-based businesses that are engaged in health 

science, telecommunications, and national defense that need quick and convenient access to Reagan 

National Airport. Alaska Airlines service would add a needed nonstop option to a primary Washington, 

DC gateway. East County EDC joins with the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority, the San 

Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation, the World Trade Center San Diego, and the San 

Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce in support of Alaska Airlines’ application for San Diego –

Washington Reagan National slots.

We thank the Department of Transportation for the opportunity to comment on the above referenced 

docket and we hope to hear of a favorable review of Alaska Airlines’ San Diego – DCA proposal soon.

Sincerely,

Jo Marie Diamond

President and CEO
1870 Cordell Court, Suite 202

El Cajon, CA 92020

P. (619) 258-3670

F. (619) 258-3674

www.eastcountyedc.org

San Diego East County Economic Development Council
#### Benjamin S. Foreman *v.*George E. Sawyer.

Practice. It is error to render judgment for a greater sum than that claimed in the declaration.

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Whiteside county; the Hon. William W. Heaton, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. Woodruff Bros., for the plaintiff in error.

Mr. F. D. Ramsay, for the defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Craig

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an action of covenant, commenced in the circuit court of Whiteside county, by George E. Sawyer against Benjamin S. Foreman.

*485The *ad damnum*in the declaration was for only the sum of $300, while the judgment rendered by the court was $555.

The law is well settled, that the judgment can not exceed the *ad da-mnum*laid in the declaration. *Oakes*v. *Ward,*19 Ill. 46; *Brown*v. *Smith,*24 Ill. 196.

It was, therefore, error for the court to render judgment for a larger sum than that claimed in the declaration; for which the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded, with leave to amend the declaration.

*Judgment reversed.*
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of New York Life Insurance and Trust Company, as Executor, etc., of Edwin C. Philbrick, Deceased, Respondent, for the Proceedings of Said Edwin C. Philbrick, as Substituted Trustee of the Trust Created by the Last Will and Testament of Adolph Hallgarten, Deceased, for the Benefit of Alice Franchetti and Remaindermen. Eleanor von Koppenfels, Appellant; Leopold Franchetti and Paul M. Warburg, as Ancillary Executor, etc., Respondents.

Decree affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
EXHIBIT
23.1










CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (Registration Nos. 333-63423 and 333-29225) and Form S-8 (Registration Nos.
33-37279, 33-21668, 33-21667, 33-47664, 33-51178, 33-66136,
33-65352, 333-38797 and 333-68863) of Hercules Incorporated of our reports
dated February 26, 2008, relating to the financial statements and  the
effectiveness of Hercules Incorporated's internal control over financial
reporting which appear in this Form 10-K.








BDO
Seidman, LLP


February
26, 2008
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4762

_____________________________
J EREMY C ORY S TILLWELL , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jennie Kinsey , Judge

. July 17, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , R OBERTS , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Exhibit 32


                    Certification Pursuant to 18 USC ss.1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Senior  Optician  Service,  Inc.
(Company) on Form 10-QSB  (Report) for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof. I, Donald Hill,
Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify to the best
of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



 /s/ Donald Hill
----------------------------
Donald Hill
Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 8, 2003
### §81o. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction over land

The Secretary of the Interior may transfer administrative jurisdiction over approximately 0.23 acres of land within Colonial National Historical Park, Virginia, to the Secretary of the Army, and in exchange therefor, he may accept administrative jurisdiction over a like amount of land from the Secretary of the Army, transfer of which is hereby authorized, for the purpose of relocating the Cape Henry Memorial Cross. Land over which jurisdiction is transferred to the Secretary of the Interior shall become part of Colonial National Historical Park, and land over which jurisdiction is transferred to the Secretary of the Army shall become part of Fort Story Military Reservation.

(Pub. L. 99–390, Aug. 23, 1986, 100 Stat. 831.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act July 3, 1930, ch. 837, 46 Stat. 855, which comprises this subchapter.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 81445 / August 21, 2017

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-17614

___________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

 : ORDER APPOINTING

LAURENCE I. BALTER d/b/a : TAX ADMINISTRATOR

ORACLE INVESTMENT : 

RESEARCH, : 

:

:

Respondent. :

___________________________________ :

By order dated June 30, 2017, the Commission issued the “Omnibus Order Directing the 

Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that Establish Distribution 

Funds” (“Omnibus Order”),1authorizing the Secretary to issue orders beginning June 2017 and 

for calendar year 2018 appointing, upon request by the Commission staff, Miller Kaplan Arase 

LLP, a certified public accounting firm, which acquired Damasco & Associates LLP (“Miller 

Kaplan”), with one of their offices located in Half Moon Bay, California, as tax administrator 

(“Tax Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund may incur taxrelated obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department of the 

Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On August 17, 2017, the Commission staff requested, pursuant to the Omnibus Order, 

the appointment of Miller Kaplan as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the abovereferenced proceeding. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Miller Kaplan, pursuant to and in accordance with the 

Omnibus Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced 

proceeding. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Brent J. Fields

Secretary

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 81057 (June 30, 2017).
### §6516. Judicial review in United States district courts

#### (a) Venue

Notwithstanding section 1391 of title 28 or other applicable law, an authorized hazardous fuels reduction project conducted under this subchapter shall be subject to judicial review only in the United States district court for a district in which the Federal land to be treated under the authorized hazardous fuels reduction project is located.

#### (b) Expeditious completion of judicial review

In the judicial review of an action challenging an authorized hazardous fuel reduction project under subsection (a), Congress encourages a court of competent jurisdiction to expedite, to the maximum extent practicable, the proceedings in the action with the goal of rendering a final determination on jurisdiction, and (if jurisdiction exists) a final determination on the merits, as soon as practicable after the date on which a complaint or appeal is filed to initiate the action.

#### (c) Injunctions

#### (1) In general

Subject to paragraph (2), the length of any preliminary injunctive relief and stays pending appeal covering an authorized hazardous fuel reduction project carried out under this subchapter shall not exceed 60 days.

#### (2) Renewal

#### (A) In general

A court of competent jurisdiction may issue 1 or more renewals of any preliminary injunction, or stay pending appeal, granted under paragraph (1).

#### (B) Updates

In each renewal of an injunction in an action, the parties to the action shall present the court with updated information on the status of the authorized hazardous fuel reduction project.

#### (3) Balancing of short- and long-term effects

As part of its weighing the equities while considering any request for an injunction that applies to an agency action under an authorized hazardous fuel reduction project, the court reviewing the project shall balance the impact to the ecosystem likely affected by the project of—

(A) the short- and long-term effects of undertaking the agency action; against

(B) the short- and long-term effects of not undertaking the agency action.

(Pub. L. 108–148, title I, §106, Dec. 3, 2003, 117 Stat. 1900.)