alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4738 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4738

 To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to provide protections against 
   pregnancy discrimination in the workplace, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 18, 2019

Mr. Walberg (for himself, Mrs. Wagner, Ms. Stefanik, and Mrs. Walorski) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to provide protections against 
   pregnancy discrimination in the workplace, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pregnancy Discrimination Amendment 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTIONS AGAINST PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION IN THE WORKPLACE.

    Section 701(k) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e(k)) 
is amended in the first sentence, by striking ``as other persons not so 
affected but similar in their ability'' and inserting ``as any other 
applicants for employment with, or employees employed by, the same 
employer, in work that is performed under similar working conditions, 
who are not so affected but similar in their temporary ability''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Roy Green, Appellant, v Joseph T. Smith, as Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[823 NYS2d 286]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Bradley, J.), entered November 25, 2005 in Ulster County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Petitioner was convicted of sexual abuse in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and four *911counts of robbery in the first degree. He was sentenced, as a second felony offender, to concurrent prison terms of seven years on the sexual abuse conviction, 15 years on the criminal possession conviction and 24 years on the robbery convictions. Thereafter, he filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus claiming that because the certificate of conviction was not signed by the sentencing judge, his conviction was not valid and he must be released from prison. Following joinder of issue, Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal ensued.

We affirm. Inasmuch as petitioner’s challenge to the certificate of conviction could have been raised on direct appeal or in a CPL article 440 motion, habeas corpus is not the appropriate remedy *(see People ex rel. Burr v Smith,*6 AD3d 841, 841 [2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 605 [2004]; *People ex rel. Burr v Duncan,*289 AD2d 898 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 612 [2002]). Moreover, even if he were to prevail on his argument that his certificate of conviction is deficient, petitioner would not be entitled to immediate release from prison and, thus, habeas corpus relief is unavailable *(see People ex rel. Burr v Duncan, supra*at 898). Accordingly, Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition.

Cardona, EJ., Mercure, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
### §4309. Savings provision

#### (a) Water

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as authorizing the appropriation of water by any Federal, State, or local agency, Indian tribe, or any other entity or individual. Nor shall any provision of this chapter—

(1) affect the rights or jurisdiction of the United States, the States, Indian tribes, or other entities over waters of any river or stream or over any ground water resource;

(2) alter, amend, repeal, interpret, modify, or be in conflict with any interstate compact made by the States; or

(3) alter or establish the respective rights of States, the United States, Indian tribes, or any person with respect to any water or water-related right.

#### (b) Fish and wildlife

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as affecting the jurisdiction or responsibilities of the States with respect to fish and wildlife.

(Pub. L. 100–691, §10, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4551.)
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)

I, Ian S. Walton, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of Aurizon Mines Ltd. (the Issuer), certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Aurizon Mines Ltd.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The Issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the Issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the Issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The Issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Issuers auditors and the audit committee of Issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Issuers internal control over financial reporting.





/s/ Ian S. Walton ________________________________________
Ian S. Walton
Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

March 31, 2006
§ 650.111 Location hydraulic studies. ( a ) National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) maps or information developed by the highway agency, if NFIP maps are not available, shall be used to determine whether a highway location alternative will include an encroachment.
( b ) Location studies shall include evaluation and discussion of the practicability of alternatives to any longitudinal encroachments.
( c ) Location studies shall include discussion of the following items, commensurate with the significance of the risk or environmental impact, for all alternatives containing encroachments and for those actions which would support base flood-plain development: ( 1 ) The risks associated with implementation of the action,
( 2 ) The impacts on natural and beneficial flood-plain values,
( 3 ) The support of probable incompatible flood-plain development,
( 4 ) The measures to minimize flood-plain impacts associated with the action, and
( 5 ) The measures to restore and preserve the natural and beneficial flood-plain values impacted by the action.
( d ) Location studies shall include evaluation and discussion of the practicability of alternatives to any significant encroachments or any support of incompatible flood-plain development.
( e ) The studies required by § 650.111 (c) and (d) shall be summarized in environmental review documents prepared pursuant to 23 CFR part 771.
( f ) Local, State, and Federal water resources and flood-plain management agencies should be consulted to determine if the proposed highway action is consistent with existing watershed and flood-plain management programs and to obtain current information on development and proposed actions in the affected watersheds.
§ 800.5 Agency components. ( a ) *CSOSA.* ( 1 ) Office of the Director (including the Deputy Director).
( 2 ) Office of the General Counsel.
( 3 ) Community Supervision Services.
( 4 ) Office of Community Justice Programs.
( 5 ) Special Criminal Justice Projects.
( 6 ) Office of Planning and Evaluation.
( 7 ) Office of Professional Responsibility.
( 8 ) Equal Employment Opportunity, Diversity, and Special Programs.
( 9 ) Office of Legislative, Intergovernmental, and Public Affairs.
( 10 ) Information Technology Services.
( 11 ) Office of Management and Administration.
( 12 ) Office of Human Resources.
( b ) *PSA.* ( 1 ) Office of the Director (including the Deputy Director).
( 2 ) Planning, Analysis and Evaluation.
( 3 ) Community Justice Programs.
( 4 ) Office of Operations (including Information Technology and Forensic Toxicology and Drug Testing Laboratory).
( 5 ) Human Resources Management.
( 6 ) Finance and Administration.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1413 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 91)11-1-92 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/9/2008 3:11:24

PM Sheet 91 of 114ra-•••<•*jn-- ptfff.3-7* ; »?<-*,-» - *> " <-*T^. ^ 

## |||[TTTj ma 

# A-^-5 ^ 

# tr-r-<rx aril' s Busines s Directory i *, . *\ i:< ISS N 1044-702 4

\/' 

# ' : 

# ':V;^ i W73i: \ 136 4 p'- f 

### i f^/ '

- / 

# MANUFACTURIN G 

# US A

fef%C 

# IndustryAnalyses , Statistics , an d Leadin g Companies

Fift h Editio n
• Acomprehensiv e guid e t o economi cactivit yi n 45 8 manufacturin g industrie s • Provide s uniqu e analysi s an d synthesi s of federa l statistic s • Include s more tha n 21,00 0 to p manufacturin g corporation s take n fro m Ward's

Business

Directory

of U.S. Private and Public Companies 

# Volum e 1 SI C 2011-329 9 

# Arse n J . Darnay , Edito r

GAL E DETROI T • NE W YOR

K• TORONT O • LONDO N * ' 

## 'JA N 

## I 9 200 ! EPAAI R DOCKE T

K
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 11


                       TRIDEX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                  EXHIBIT 11 COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                  (Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                 Years Ended December 31,
                                                             -------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     2000                  1999                  1998
                                                             -------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                          <C>                        <C>                   <C>
BASIC
  EARNINGS:
     Loss from continuing operations                         $      (22,025)            $   (16,271)          $   (14,943)
     (Loss) income from discontinued operations                         (26)                  1,506                   797
     Net gain on sale of discontinued operations                      5,588                       0                     0
     Extraordinary loss due to debt modification                       (695)                      0                     0
                                                             -------------------------------------------------------------
     Net loss available to common
       stockholders                                          $      (17,158)            $   (14,765)          $   (14,146)
                                                             =============================================================
  SHARES:
       Average common shares outstanding                           6,249,000              6,368,000             6,077,000
                                                             =============================================================
  EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC:
     Loss from continuing operations                         $         (3.53)           $    (2.56)           $     (2.46)
     Income from discontinued operations                                0.89                   0.24                  0.13
     Extraordinary loss                                                (0.11)                     0                     0
                                                             -------------------------------------------------------------
     Net loss                                                $         (2.75)           $     (2.32)          $     (2.33)
                                                             =============================================================
</TABLE>
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
  
 
 
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Steven J. Strobel
   
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Lawrence J. Bennett, an Attorney.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and MeCurn, JJ.
### §554d. Recreation facilities for employees of Forest Service and their immediate families

Not to exceed $100,000 annually of funds available to the Forest Service may be expended for providing recreation facilities, equipment, and services for use by employees of the Service located at isolated situations and, where deemed to be in the public interest, by members of the immediate families of such employees.

(Pub. L. 87–869, §3, Oct. 23, 1962, 76 Stat. 1157; Pub. L. 101–512, title II, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1944.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Pub. L. 101–512 substituted "$100,000" for "$35,000".
!

!

"	#"$%#& ! $'()'*+,-)"

! ./012!

31$ !

!

	
	"	

#	4"


	

		




 
!"#$%&() 

* ##+ ,# + -

 -# .!#
/",$	0123(.4

#  ) 

* -" 


4 4. " .,

!"#$	0156( 

#78.7869. ##.". -4#.:

!"##
 ;72.7869) 

*-" 
 

	  "")

	

	 .  "-. # "

) 

	

	 #-.
 .4. 

	!"#$<<=668.573<6>(#.4#35? 

+ 4" @$ (A$=7B.787<>7()$(CA$=689.999<93() $(


Case 16-10459-RGM Doc 98 Filed 06/28/16 Entered 06/28/16 17:22:38 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
A$=63.588(.  :!"## + ) 

	

	 ##=7.88><95* 

##+ "" -4
 D E./.


 .4. 	35? "$<<=6.583<7F(  

=587<F6.#:!"##) 

	

	 #+  -- - ##  4

) 

	

	   .  "-.;-6>.

7869 >@B8 <"< ,4 

##+

" <

	 @ 

*< -

 C 0#-;


	0@

G
H
D@

II+C< "

+C< ".JC 1BB777

	


-.C . "E.</<<

B88<G <.787

!  .J77B6F

$38B(5F>:588B



	*

	@

II/ <H+-

Jun 28 2016 /s/ Robert G. Mayer

eod 6/28/2016

Case 16-10459-RGM Doc 98 Filed 06/28/16 Entered 06/28/16 17:22:38 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
! </ .JC 1757B3

/ H+-.JC 13226B




	
/	E

/


6335G+<.F88

.J786>8

$38B(762:76BF$</ (

$38B(762:76B5$<H+-(

	"#	##-*55)'.!.'!

-- ## -  -# <

II+C< "

+C< "

Case 16-10459-RGM Doc 98 Filed 06/28/16 Entered 06/28/16 17:22:38 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 10.40

AMENDMENT 2001-1  TO THE  HILTON HOTELS  EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION hereby adopts this Amendment No. 2001-1 to the Hilton Hotels Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan"). This
Amendment is adopted pursuant to the provisions of Section 10.4 of the Plan.

1.    The
definitions for "Base Salary Deferral", "Bonus Compensation Deferral" and "Compensation Deferral" in Section 1.2 of the Plan are amended to read, in their
entirety, as follows:

""Base
Salary Deferral" shall mean that portion of Base Salary as to which an Eligible Employee has made an irrevocable election to defer receipt of until the date specified under the
In-Service Distribution Option and/or the Retirement Distribution Option."

""Bonus
Compensation Deferral" shall mean that portion of Bonus Compensation as to which an Eligible Employee has made an irrevocable election to defer receipt of until the date
specified under the In-Service Distribution Option and/or the Retirement Distribution Option."

""Compensation
Deferral" means that portion of Compensation as to which a Participant has made an irrevocable election to defer receipt until the date specified under the
In-Service Distribution Option and/or the Retirement Distribution Option."

2.    Paragraphs
(c) and (d) in Section 3.1 of the Plan are amended to read, in their entirety, as follows:



3.    First
sentence in Section 6.2 of the Plan is amended, in its entirety, to read as follows:



1

---

4.    First
sentence in Section 6.6(a) of the Plan is amended to read, in its entirety, as follows:



5.    The
amendments made by this instrument shall be effective January 1, 2002.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, and as evidence of the adoption of this Amendment 2001-1, Hilton Hotels Corporation has caused the same to be executed by its duly authorized officers and
its corporate seal to be affixed hereto this 14 day of November, 2001.

|Attest:           |  | HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION
|----------------- |  | -------------------------
|/s/RITA BAXENDALE |  | By:                      
|Witness           |  |                          

2

---

QuickLinks
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

August 17, 2012

Before

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge *

No. 10

‐ 3450

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States District

Plaintiff

‐ Appellee, Court for the Central District of Illinois.

v. No. 09 CR 40095

JEFFREY J. HYDE, Michael M. Mihm,

Defendant

‐ Appellant. Judge.

O R D E R

A jury convicted appellant Jeffrey J. Hyde of possessing with the intent to distribute

five grams or more of crack cocaine, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and he was sentenced to a

prison term of 120 months, the statutory minimum term required at the time Hyde

committed the offense, see § 841(b)(1)(B)(iii) (2009). The district court rejected Hyde’s

contention that he should be sentenced pursuant to the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, 124 Stat.

2372 (“FSA”), which reduced the penalties for offenses involving crack cocaine and which

took effect prior to his sentencing. 

### NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

* 

### Circuit Judge Evans died on August 10, 2011, and did not participate in the

decision of this case on remand from the Supreme Court. The case is now being

resolved by a quorum of the panel under 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).No. 10

‐ 3450 

### 2

Hyde appealed his sentence, but in our order of June 13, 2011, we summarily

affirmed the sentence in light of our decision in United States v. Fisher

, 635 F.3d 336 (7th Cir.

2011), which held that the FSA applied only prospectively to conduct occurring after the

statute’s enactment.

In Dorsey v. United States

, 132 S. Ct. 2321, 2335 (2012), the Supreme Court disagreed

with our holding in Fisher and “conclude[d] that Congress intended the Fair Sentencing

Act ʹ s new, lower mandatory minimums to apply to the post

‐ Act sentencing of pre

‐ Act

offenders.” Subsequently, the Supreme Court granted Hyde’s petition for a writ of

certiorari, vacated the judgment, and remanded the case to this court for reconsideration in

light of its decision in Dorsey

. Hyde v. United States

, 2012 WL 2470066 (U.S. June 29, 2012).

The parties have filed a joint Circuit Rule 54 statement reflecting their agreement

that, in view of Dorsey

, the district court committed procedural error at Hyde’s sentencing

and that the error was not harmless. We agree, and we therefore VACATE Hyde’s

sentence and REMAND for resentencing.
STATEOFDELAWAREDEPARTMENTOFNATURALRESOURCESANDENVIRONMENTALCONTROL89KINGsHIGHWAYDOVER,DELAWARE19901March10,2010Mr.ShawnGarvin(3RAOO)RECEIVEDRegionalAdministrator2010U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyMAR182010RegionIIISAP301650ArchStreetJvLüUsrector(3APOO)Philadelphia,PA19103-2029DearMain:>9’ThisletterisintendedtosupplementtheDelawareDepartmentofNaturalResourcesandEnvironmentalControl(DNREC)StateImplementationPlans(SIP)revisionentitled,“Implementation,MaintenanceandEnforcementofNationalAmbientAirQualityStandards,StateImplementationPlanRevisionforOzone,FineParticulateMatter(PM251),andVisibility”datedDecember13,2007,andtheSIPrevisionentitled,“Implementation,Maintenance,andEnforcementofthe200624-HrPM2.5NAAQS”datedSeptember16,2009.ThesesubmjttalsidentifiedhowtheStateofDelawarehassatisfiedthe“infrastructure”elementsforSIPSrequiredundersections110(a)(2)(A-M)oftheCleanAirAct(CAA)forthe1997ozoneandPM25NAAQSandforthe2006PM2.5NAAQS.WithrespecttoadequatecontingencyplansrequiredpursuanttoCAAsection110(a)(2)(G),bythisletterDNRECcertifiesthatDelaware’scurrentSIPmeetssuchrequirementsof110(a)(2)becauseexistingmonitoredlevelsofPM2.5havenotexceededthelevelof140.4microgramspercubicmeter(seeTable),asidentifiedbyEPAinitsSeptember25,2009GuidanceonSIPElementsRequiredUnderSections110(a)(1)and(2)forthe200624hourFineParticle(PM2.5)NationalAmbientAirQualityStandards.WelookforwardtocontinuingthecooperativeeffortbetweenDelawareandEPAinthisimportantwork.Asalways,feelfreetocontactmeorAuMirzakhalili,ProgramAdministrator,(302)739-9402,ifyouhaveanyquestionsconcerningthissubmittal.Ve€aaia’zeØood7taza’zedefteciddOz COFFICEOFTHESECRETARY1PHONE:(302)739-9000FAX:(302)739-6242Mr.ShawnGarvinMarch10,2010Page#2Sincerely,9dllinP.O’MaraSecretarycc:DaveArnold,EPAw/attacbmentChristinaFernandez,EPAw/attachmentAuMirzakhaliliC

CAttachment1Table12006—2008PM2.5maximumpersiteperyear,inug/m3**YearBellefonteMLKNewarkLumsDoverKillensSeaford20063848.240.337.242.846.546.6200737.841.435.233.338.73844.9200836.339.334.332.630.530.830.8**2009valueshavenotyetbeencertifiedandthereforearenotincluded.However,noneofthe2009un-certifiedvaluesexceed140.0ug/m3.CC