alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Melanie Snuszki, as Administrator of the Estate of Peggy Anne Bannach Wright, Deceased, for the Benefit of Ian Wright and Another, Respondent, v Thomas Wright, Appellant, and Eliot Spitzer, as Attorney General of State of New York, Intervenor-Respondent.

[824 NYS2d 519]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Ralph A. Boniello, III, J.), entered May 2, 2005 in an action pursuant to Executive Law article 22. The order, after a nonjury *1236trial, awarded plaintiff damages in the amount of $1 million against defendant.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant, an inmate at Sullivan Correctional Facility, was convicted of murder in the second degree for causing the death of his estranged wife, Peggy Anne Bannach Wright (decedent), in 1988. Plaintiff, the daughter of decedent and administrator of decedent’s estate, commenced this action pursuant to Executive Law article 22 seeking to recover, as compensation for decedent’s wrongful death, funds received by defendant in settlement of an action against employees of the New York State Department of Correctional Services. We reject the contention of defendant that Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying his request for assignment of an attorney *(see Wills v City of Troy, 258*AD2d 849 [1999], *lv dismissed*93 NY2d 1000 [1999]; *Morgenthau v Garcia,*148 Misc 2d 900, 903-904 [1990]). Contrary to defendant’s further contention, the award of $1 million to plaintiff and her brother does not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation for past and future loss of parental guidance *(see*CPLR 5501 [c]; *Adderley v City of New York,*304 AD2d 485, 486 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 511 [2003]). Defendant’s remaining contentions were raised and decided in a prior appeal in this action *(see Snuszki v Wright,*1 AD3d 879 [2003], *appeal dismissed*1 NY3d 623 [2004]) and reconsideration of those contentions is thus foreclosed *(see Mobil Oil Corp. v City of Syracuse Indus. Dev. Agency,*224 AD2d 15, 19 [1996], *appeal dismissed*89 NY2d 860 [1996], *lv denied*89 NY2d 811 [1997]). Present—Gorski, J.E, Smith, Centra and Green, JJ.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

Release No. 9623 / July 28, 2014

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-15903

 

In the Matter of 

THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT OF 

SUNCHIP TECHNOLOGY, INC.

CORRECTED NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by Sunchip Technology, Inc., and the Commission has 

not chosen to review the decision on its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission's Rules 

of Practice,1 that the initial decision of the administrative law judge2 has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to the registration statement of Sunchip Technology, 

Inc. The order contained in that decision is hereby declared effective. The initial decision

ordered that, pursuant to Section 8(d) of the Securities Act of 1933, the effectiveness of the 

registration statement filed by Sunchip Technology, Inc., is suspended.

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Jill M. Peterson

Assistant Secretary

 1 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2 The Registration Statement of Sunchip Tech., Inc., Initial Decision Rel. No. 613 (June 16, 

2014), 109 SEC Docket 03, 2014 WL 2704315.
H. R. 4779 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To extend the Undertaking Spam, Spyware, And Fraud Enforcement With Enforcers 

beyond Borders Act of 2006, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE U.S. SAFE WEB ACT OF 2006. 

Section 13 of the U.S. SAFE WEB Act of 2006 (Public Law 

109–455; 15 U.S.C. 44 note) is amended by striking ‘‘September 

30, 2020’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2027’’. 

SEC. 2. REPORT. 

Not later than 3 years after the date of the enactment of 

this Act, the Federal Trade Commission shall transmit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives 

and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of 

the Senate a report describing its use of and experience with the 

authority granted by the U.S. SAFE WEB Act of 2006 (Public 

Law 109–455) and the amendments made by such Act. The report 

shall include— 

(1) the number of cross-border complaints received and 

acted upon by the Commission; 

(2) identification of the foreign agencies with which the 

Commission has cooperated and the results of such cooperation, 

including any foreign agency enforcement action or lack thereof; 

(3) a description of Commission litigation brought in foreign 

courts and the results of such litigation; and 

(4) any recommendations for legislation that may advance 

the mission of the Commission in carrying out the U.S. SAFE 

WEB Act of 2006 and the amendments made by such Act. 

SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 

with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined 

by reference to the latest statement titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of 

PAYGO Legislation’’ for this Act, submitted for printing in the 
H. R. 4779—2 

Congressional Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior 

to the vote on passage. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
### §409a. Acceptance of title to lands

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to accept donations of land, interest in land, buildings, structures, and other property within the boundaries of said park as determined and fixed hereunder and donations of funds for the purchase and/or maintenance thereof, the title and evidence of title to lands purchased to be satisfactory to the Secretary of the Interior: Provided, That the Secretary of the Interior is authorized, in his discretion, to accept on behalf of the United States other lands, easements, and buildings of Revolutionary War interest in Morris and adjacent counties in New Jersey as may be donated for the extension of the Morristown National Historical Park.

(Mar. 2, 1933, ch. 182, §2, 47 Stat. 1421.)
J. Parker Erkmann

T: +1 202 776 2036

perkmann@cooley.com

VIA REGULATIONS.GOV AND EMAIL

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM

March 6, 2015

Mr. Paul Gretch

Director

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

Room W86-316

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Polling Results for Joint Application of JetBlue Airways Corporation and Royal Air 

Maroc for a Blanket Statement of Authorization and an Exemption, DOT-OST-2015-

0046-0001

Dear Mr. Gretch:

We have polled and received non-objections from each of the carriers on the 

attached service list for the above-referenced joint application of JetBlue Airways 

Corporation (“JetBlue”) and Royal Air Maroc. Prompt approval is requested so that JetBlue

and Air Maroc can initiate the proposed codeshare services on the routes which were listed 

in the Annex of the joint application on or about April 1, 2015, provided all necessary 

approvals have been secured.

Sincerely,

J. Parker Erkmann

Counsel for JetBlue Airways Corporation

CC: Don Hainbach, Esq.

JPE:ec
Mr. Paul Gretch

March 6, 2015

Page Two

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM

Service List

rpommer@atlasair.com Atlas Air

howard.kass@aa.com

robert.wirick@aa.com

Abigail.donvan@aa.com

American 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

chris.walker@delta.com

Delta 

nssparks@fedex.com

anbird@fedex.com

FedEx

thomas.bolling@united.com

seve.morrissey@united.com

dan.weiss@united.com

United

Jennifer.Nowak@hklaw.com

Anita.Mosner@hklaw.com

UPS

robert.finamore@dot.gov 

brett.kruger@dot.gov

brian.hedberg@dot.gov

reese.davidson@dot.gov

john.s.duncan@faa.gov

englets@state.gov 

finstonma@state.gov 

cristinasa@state.gov

114655146
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4359 — Petroplus/Exxonmobil)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 6/07)

On 15 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case No COMP/M.3489 — GOLDMAN SACHS/CERBERUS/GWS BERLIN)

(2004/C 195/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 22 July 2004, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

CELEX: subscriber information

http://publications.eu.int/general/en/eulaw_en.htm

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6582

WILLIAM RAY WARD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ROBERT E. WARD, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-96-1712-2-20AJ)

Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: April 28, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Ray Ward, Appellant Pro Se. Robert F. Daley, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

William Ray Ward seeks to appeal the district court's order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, as to the merits

of Ward's claims, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. Ward v. Ward, No.

CA-96-1712-2-20AJ (D.S.C. Mar. 24, 1997). Because Ward's petition

is meritless, we decline to address the retroactivity of the statute of limitations enacted in the Antiterrorism and Effective Death

Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Contagie la alegría,

Vacune a sus hijos—Llame a su médico, enfermera o clínica.

Todas las personas mayores de seis meses deben obtener

la vacuna contra la infuenza anualmente.

Hasta los niños sanos de cualquier edad pueden enfermarse gravemente con

la infuenza (la gripe) y pueden propagarla entre sus familiares, amigos y otras personas.

no la influenza.

Para mas informatión, visita http://www.flu.gov CS253728-V
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of RTCA Special Committee 224 meeting: Airport Security Access Control Systems (Update to DO-230B).

# SUMMARY:

The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a meeting of RTCA Special Committee 224: Airport Security Access Control Systems

# DATES:

The meeting will be held April 13, 2011, from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1828 L Street, NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036 in the MacIntosh-NBAA Room and Hilton- ATA Room.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC, 20036, telephone (202) 833-9339, fax (202) 833-9434, Web site                         *http://www.rtca.org.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., and Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for a Special Committee 224, Airport Security Access Control Systems (Update to DO-230B):

## Agenda

### April 13, 2011

    - Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks.
    - Review/Approve Summary—Fifth Meeting.
    - Report on Security Construction Guidelines Process.
    - Final Revision Review—Revised DO-230B.
    - Briefing Preparations—Program Management Committee (PMC).
    - Plans for Next Version.
    - Any Other Business.
    - Adjourn.

                    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in the                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                     section. Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.                

Issued in Washington, DC, on March 16, 2011.

Robert L. Bostiga,

RTCA Advisory Committee.

[FR Doc. 2011-6843 Filed 3-22-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Document Search 
-  Advisory Committee On Veterans Business Affairs Charter 

# Advisory Committee on Veterans Business Affairs Charter

## About this document and download

  Download  .pdf

**Effective**

**Owned by**
### §698m–2. Establishment of recreational access points, roads, etc., in conjunction with creation of Big Cypress National Preserve Addition; cooperation among agencies

The Secretary and other involved Federal agencies shall cooperate with the State of Florida to establish recreational access points and roads, rest and recreation areas, wildlife protection, hunting, fishing, frogging, and other traditional recreational opportunities in conjunction with the creation of the Addition and in the construction of Interstate Highway 75. Three of such access points shall be located within the preserve (including the Addition).

(Pub. L. 93–440, §10, as added Pub. L. 100–301, §5, Apr. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 445.)
T.C. Summary Opinion 2002-86

UNITED STATES TAX COURT

SCOTT T. NOBLES, Petitioner v.

 COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Docket No. 5275-00S. Filed July 11, 2002.

Scott T. Nobles, pro se.

Paul K. Voelker, for respondent.

PAJAK, Special Trial Judge: This case was heard pursuant to

the provisions of section 7463. The decision to be entered is

not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion should not be

cited as authority. All section references are to the Internal

Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue. All Rule

references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners’ 1998

Federal income tax in the amount of $2,088. After concessions by
- 2 -

both parties, the sole issue for decision is whether petitioner

is entitled to a greater automobile mileage allowance than that

allowed by respondent.

Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. 

Petitioner resided in North Highlands, California, at the time

his petition was filed.

During 1998, petitioner was in the hardwood floor business. 

Petitioner owned a 1977 Chevrolet Sierra pickup truck and used it

exclusively in his business. On his 1998 Federal income tax

return, petitioner claimed a deduction for actual automobile

expenses in the amount of $13,409. Respondent disallowed that

amount, as well as others that have been resolved by concessions,

and allowed $6,538 based on a reconstruction of approximately

21,700 miles at the standard mileage rate.

Section 7491 does not apply in this case because petitioner

has not complied with all applicable substantiation requirements. 

Sec. 7491(a)(2)(A).

Section 274(d) requires a taxpayer to substantiate the

business use of listed property, as defined in section

280F(d)(4), which includes a pickup truck, by adequate records or

by sufficient evidence corroborating the taxpayer’s own

statement. The limited evidence placed in the record by

petitioner fails to persuade us that he is entitled to a greater

allowance for mileage than respondent allowed. Accordingly, we
- 3 -

have no choice but to sustain respondent’s determination on this

point.

Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case

Division.

To reflect the concessions,

Decision will be entered 

under Rule 155.
# Official Journal C 188/30 M

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 188 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6630 May 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 188

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6630 May 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions |
| | RESOLUTIONS |
| | Committee of the Regions |
| | 154th CoR Plenary Session, 15.3.2023–16.3.2023 |
| 2023/C 188/01 | Resolution of the European Committee of the Regions on harnessing talent in Europe’s regions | 1 |
| 2023/C 188/02 | Resolution of the European Committee of the Regions on the initiative for strengthening social dialogue | 6 |
| | OPINIONS |
| | Committee of the Regions |
| | 154th CoR Plenary Session, 15.3.2023–16.3.2023 |
| 2023/C 188/03 | Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on the Future of the Eastern Partnership from a local and regional perspective | 10 |
| 2023/C 188/04 | Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on targets and tools for a smart rural Europe | 14 |

Contents

page

I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

RESOLUTIONS

Committee of the Regions

154th CoR Plenary Session, 15.3.2023–16.3.2023

2023/C 188/01

Resolution of the European Committee of the Regions on harnessing talent in Europe’s regions

1

2023/C 188/02

Resolution of the European Committee of the Regions on the initiative for strengthening social dialogue

6

OPINIONS

Committee of the Regions

154th CoR Plenary Session, 15.3.2023–16.3.2023

2023/C 188/03

Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on the Future of the Eastern Partnership from a local and regional perspective

10

2023/C 188/04

Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on targets and tools for a smart rural Europe

14

---

| | III   Preparatory acts |
| --- | --- |
| | Committee of the Regions |
| | 154th CoR Plenary Session, 15.3.2023–16.3.2023 |
| 2023/C 188/05 | Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on short-term accommodation rental services: balancing the needs of local communities, entrepreneurs and travellers | 19 |
| 2023/C 188/06 | Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on sustainable use of pesticides | 43 |
| 2023/C 188/07 | Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on the proposal for a directive on asbestos | 70 |
| 2023/C 188/08 | Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on the ‘European Media Freedom Act’ | 79 |

III   Preparatory acts

Committee of the Regions

154th CoR Plenary Session, 15.3.2023–16.3.2023

2023/C 188/05

Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on short-term accommodation rental services: balancing the needs of local communities, entrepreneurs and travellers

19

2023/C 188/06

Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on sustainable use of pesticides

43

2023/C 188/07

Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on the proposal for a directive on asbestos

70

2023/C 188/08

Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions on the ‘European Media Freedom Act’

79

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 44523

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

TYLER WILLIAM BRADSHAW,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2017 Unpublished Opinion No. 519

Filed: July 17, 2017

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Twin 

Falls County. Hon. G. Richard Bevan, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of eight years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of three years, for attempted strangulation, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Reed P. Anderson, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM 

Tyler William Bradshaw was found guilty of attempted strangulation. Idaho Code § 18-

923. The district court sentenced Bradshaw to a unified term of eight years with three years 

determinate and retained jurisdiction. After the period of retained jurisdiction, the district court 

placed Bradshaw on probation for three years. Bradshaw appeals asserting that the district court 

abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Bradshaw’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.