alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §7001. Definitions

In this chapter:

#### (1) Advisory panel

The term "advisory panel" means the Advisory Panel on Pacific Hake/Whiting established by the Agreement.

#### (2) Agreement

The term "Agreement" means the Agreement between the Government of the United States and the Government of Canada on Pacific Hake/Whiting, signed at Seattle, Washington, on November 21, 2003.

#### (3) Catch

The term "catch" means all fishery removals from the offshore whiting resource, including landings, discards, and bycatch in other fisheries.

#### (4) Joint management committee

The term "joint management committee" means the joint management committee established by the Agreement.

#### (5) Joint technical committee

The term "joint technical committee" means the joint technical committee established by the Agreement.

#### (6) Offshore whiting resource

The term "offshore whiting resource" means the transboundary stock of Merluccius productus that is located in the offshore waters of the United States and Canada except in Puget Sound and the Strait of Georgia.

#### (7) Scientific review group

The term "scientific review group" means the scientific review group established by the Agreement.

#### (8) Secretary

The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Commerce.

#### (9) United States Section

The term "United States Section" means the United States representatives on the joint management committee.

(Pub. L. 109–479, title VI, §602, Jan. 12, 2007, 120 Stat. 3644.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 109–479, title VI, §601, Jan. 12, 2007, 120 Stat. 3644, provided that: "This title [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Pacific Whiting Act of 2006'."
§ 51.38 Obtaining information from others. ( a ) The Attorney General may at any time request relevant information from governmental jurisdictions and from interested groups and individuals and may conduct any investigation or other inquiry that is deemed appropriate in making a determination.
( b ) If a submission does not contain evidence of adequate notice to the public, and the Attorney General believes that such notice is essential to a determination, steps will be taken by the Attorney General to provide public notice sufficient to invite interested or affected persons to provide evidence as to the presence or absence of a discriminatory purpose or effect. The submitting authority shall be advised when any such steps are taken.
### §403c–4. Forfeiture of property used in commission of offenses

All guns, traps, nets, seines, teams, horses, or means of transportation of every nature or description, used by any person or persons within the limits of said park when engaged in killing, trapping, ensnaring, taking, or capturing such wild beasts, birds, fish, or animals, shall be forfeited to the United States and may be seized by the officers in said park and held pending prosecution of any person or persons arrested under the charge of violating the provisions of this Act, and upon conviction under this Act of such person or persons using said guns, traps, nets, seines, teams, horses, or other means of transportation, such forfeiture shall be adjudicated as a penalty in addition to the other punishment prescribed in this Act. Such forfeited property shall be disposed of and accounted for by and under the authority of the Secretary of the Interior.

(Aug. 19, 1937, ch. 703, §4, 50 Stat. 701.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act Aug. 19, 1937, which is classified to sections 403c–1 to 403c–11 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
# Official Journal C 58/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 58 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 653 February 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 58

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 653 February 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 58/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Supplement 2022/1 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2022/C 58/02 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Supplement 2022/1 (
  1
  ) | 16 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 58/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Supplement 2022/1 (
  1
  )

1

1

2022/C 58/02

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Supplement 2022/1 (
  1
  )

1

16

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Perita Mateiasevici et al., Respondents, v Dawn M. Daccordo et al., Appellants.

[825 NYS2d 502]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Johnson, J.), dated December 8, 2005, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs demonstrated their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability by establishing that the defendants’ vehicle proceeded into an intersection controlled by a stop sign without yielding the right of way to their approaching vehicle *(see*Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1142 [a]).

There may be more than one proximate cause of an accident and the fact that the defendant Armando Daccordo (hereinafter Daccordo) allegedly “ran” the stop sign does not preclude a *652finding that comparative negligence by the plaintiff Perita Mateiasevici (hereinafter Mateiasevici) contributed to the incident. A driver with a right of way has a corresponding duty to use reasonable care to avoid a collision *(see Cox v Nunez,*23 AD3d 427 [2005]; *Romano v 202 Corp.,*305 AD2d 576).

The defendants’ speculative and conclusory assertions that Mateiasevici was speeding and failed to take reasonable evasive action to avoid the accident are, however, unsupported by the record *(see Platt v Wolman,*29 AD3d 663 [2006]; *McNamara v Fishkowitz,*18 AD3d 721 [2005]; *Ishak v Guzman,*12 AD3d 409 [2004]; *Nolan v Mizrahi,*12 AD3d 430 [2004]; *Trzepacz v Jara,*11 AD3d 531 [2004]; *Meliarenne v Prisco,*9 AD3d 353 [2004]; *Morgan v Hachmann,*9 AD3d 400 [2004]; *Spatola v Gelco Corp.,*5 AD3d 469 [2004]). He had the right of way and was entitled to assume that Daccordo would obey the traffic laws requiring him to yield *(see Platt v Wolman, supra).*Accordingly, there being no triable issues of fact raised by the defendants, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability *(see*CPLR 3212 [e]). Adams, J.P., Rivera, Skelos and Lifson, JJ., concur.
### §460l–16. Postauthorization development of projects without allocation or reallocation of costs

Nothing herein shall be construed as preventing or discouraging postauthorization development of any project for recreation or fish and wildlife enhancement or both by non-Federal public bodies pursuant to agreement with the head of the Federal agency having jurisdiction over the project. Such development shall not be the basis for any allocation or reallocation of project costs to recreation or fish and wildlife enhancement.

(Pub. L. 89–72, §5, July 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 215.)
§ 320.5 Decision. ( a ) *Approval of application.* If the application for the certificate of citizenship is approved, after the applicant takes the oath of allegiance prescribed in 8 CFR 337.1 (unless the oath is waived), USCIS will issue a certificate of citizenship.
( b ) *Denial of application.* If the decision of USCIS is to deny the application for a certificate of citizenship under this section, the applicant will be advised in writing of the reasons for denial and of the right to appeal in accordance with 8 CFR 103.3(a). An applicant may file an appeal within 30 days of service of the decision in accordance with the instructions on the form prescribed by USCIS for that purpose, and with the fee required by 8 CFR 106.2.
( c ) *Subsequent application.* After an application for a certificate of citizenship has been denied and the time for appeal has expired, USCIS will reject a subsequent application submitted by the same individual and the applicant will be instructed to submit a motion for reopening or reconsideration in accordance with 8 CFR 103.5. The motion must be accompanied by the rejected application and the fee specified in 8 CFR 106.2.
[76 FR 53799, Aug. 29, 2011, as amended at 85 FR 46928, Aug. 3, 2020]
### §6855. Cooperation and coordination

#### (a) Third-party providers

The Secretaries may enter into an agreement with a third party to carry out any provision of this chapter.

#### (b) US Geological Survey

The Secretaries may work with the Director of the United States Geological Survey to collect, aggregate, digitize, standardize, or publish data on behalf of the Secretary of the Interior to meet the requirements of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 117–114, §6, Apr. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 1177.)
#### § 71.53 Stays of Agency proceedings at the request of the Department.

With respect to matters assigned to their divisions, the Assistant Attorneys General of the litigating divisions are authorized to determine that the continuation of any hearing under 31 U.S.C. 3803(b)(3) with respect to a claim or statement may adversely affect any pending or potential criminal or civil action related to such claim or statement, and to so notify the authority head of this determination and thereafter to determine when such hearing may resume.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 64 (Monday, April 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 18583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7303]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MORRIS K. UDALL AND STEWART L. UDALL FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 9 a.m. to 12 p.m., Friday, April 15, 2011.

PLACE: University of Arizona Special Collections, 1510 E. University 
Boulevard, Tucson, Arizona, Meeting Room C205.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public, unless it is necessary 
for the Board to consider items in executive session.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: (1) A report on the U.S. Institute for 
Environmental Conflict Resolution; (2) A report from the Udall Center 
for Studies in Public Policy; (3) A report on the Native Nations 
Institute; (4) Program Reports; and (5) A Report from the Management 
Committee.

PORTIONS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC: All sessions with the exception of the 
session listed below.

PORTIONS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC: Executive session.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Ellen K. Wheeler, Executive 
Director, 130 South Scott Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85701, (520) 901-8500.

    Dated: March 23, 2011.
Ellen K. Wheeler,
Executive Director, Morris K. Udall and Stewart L. Udall Foundation, 
and Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-7303 Filed 4-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-FN-M
Docket No. FAA-2012-1163
### §695j–1. Conformity of contracts with Federal law through negotiation of amendments

The Secretary is hereby authorized to negotiate amendments to existing contracts to conform said contracts to the provisions of sections 695d to 695j–1 of this title.

(Aug. 27, 1954, ch. 1012, §8, as added Pub. L. 95–616, §10(b), Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3115.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 1240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1240 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10355, Mar. 3, 2003.

#### § 1240.55 Proceedings commenced prior to April 1, 1997.

Subpart F of 8 CFR part 1240 applies to deportation proceedings commenced prior to April 1, 1997. A deportation proceeding is commenced by the filing of Form I-221 (Order to Show Cause) with the Immigration Court, and an alien is considered to be in deportation proceedings only upon such filing, except in the case of an alien admitted to the United States under the provisions of section 217 of the Act. All references to the Act contained in this subpart are references to the Act in effect prior to April 1, 1997.
### §576a. Authorization of appropriation for reforestation

There is authorized to be appropriated for each fiscal year after year ending June 30, 1934, not to exceed $400,000, to enable the Secretary of Agriculture to establish and operate nurseries, to collect or to purchase tree seed or young trees, to plant trees, and to do all other things necessary for reforestation by planting or seeding national forests and for the additional protection, care, and improvement of the resulting plantations or young growth.

(June 9, 1930, ch. 416, §2, 46 Stat. 527.)
EXHIBIT 99.2

                     Form of Section 906 Certification

               CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of NMXS.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the
"Report"), I, Teresa Dickey, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the Company.


/s/ Teresa Dickey
Teresa Dickey
Principal Financial Officer

Date:  May 20, 2003
### Geologic Setting of the Hamme Tungsten District, North Carolina and Virginia

By: John Mason Parker

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1122G

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 96687 / January 18, 2023

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-17582

In the Matter of

Weatherford International PLC, f/k/a 

Weatherford International LTD., 

James Hudgins, CPA, and Darryl 

Kitay, CPA

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO 

ENTER AN ORDER APPROVING OR 

DISAPPROVING PLAN OF 

DISTRIBUTION

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-17628

In the Matter of

Ernst & Young LLP, Craig R. 

Fronckiewicz, CPA, and Sarah E. 

Adams, CPA

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

On November 17, 2022, pursuant to Rule 1103 of the United States Securities and 

Exchange Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans (the “Commission’s 

Rules”), 17 C.F.R.§ 201.1103, the Commission published a Notice of Proposed Plan of 

Distribution and Opportunity to Comment (“Notice”)1for the distribution of monies placed into 

a Fair Fund in the above-captioned matters. The Notice invited public comment on the proposed 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 96340 (Nov. 17, 2022).
2

plan of distribution (“Plan”) through December 19, 2022, and the Commission received three

public comments that raised various issues (the “Comments”).

Rule 1104 of the Commission’s Rules, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1104, provides in relevant part, 

“[t]he order approving or disapproving the plan should be entered within 30 days after the end of 

the final period allowed for comments on the proposed plan unless the Commission or the 

hearing officer, by written order, allows a longer period for good cause shown.”

Thirty days from the end of the final period for comments on the Plan will lapse on January 18, 

2023. The Division states additional time is needed to present its recommendation to the 

Commission regarding the Comments and the Plan, and therefore, good cause has been shown to 

enter an order extending time to approve or disapprove the Plan until June 30, 2023.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1104 of the Commission’s Rules,2

for good cause shown, the time for entering an order approving or disapproving the Plan is 

extended to June 30, 2023.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary

 

2

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1104.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Investment Company Act Release No.35168; 812-15557

Aether Infrastructure & Natural Resources Fund and Aether Investment Partners, LLC

April 10, 2024

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission” or “SEC”).

ACTION: Notice.

Notice of an application under section 6(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”) 

for an exemption from sections 18(a)(2), 18(c) and 18(i) of the Act, under sections 6(c) and 23(c) 

of the Act for an exemption from rule 23c-3 under the Act, and for an order pursuant to section 

17(d) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act.

Summary of Application: Applicants request an order to permit certain registered closed-end 

investment companies to issue multiple classes of shares and to impose asset-based distribution 

and/or service fees and early withdrawal charges.

Applicants: Aether Infrastructure & Natural Resources Fund and Aether Investment Partners, 

LLC

Filing Dates: The application was filed on March 27, 2024.

Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the requested relief will be issued unless 

the Commission orders a hearing. Interested persons may request a hearing on any application 

by e-mailing the SEC’s Secretary at Secretarys-Office@sec.gov and serving the Applicants with 

a copy of the request by e-mail, if an e-mail address is listed for the relevant Applicant below, or 

personally or by mail, if a physical address is listed for the relevant Applicant below. Hearing 

requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on May 6, 2024, and should be 

accompanied by proof of service on the Applicants, in the form of an affidavit, or, for lawyers, a 
certificate of service. Pursuant to rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should state the nature 

of the writer’s interest, any facts bearing upon the desirability of a hearing on the matter, the 

reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing 

may request notification by emailing the Commission’s Secretary. 

ADDRESSES: The Commission: Secretarys-Office@sec.gov. Applicants: Joshua B. Deringer, 

Esq., Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, joshua.deringer@faegredrinker.com with a copy to 

Sean Goodrich, Aether Investment Partners, LLC, 1900 Sixteen Street, Suite 825, Denver, 

Colorado 80202. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Trace W. Rakestraw, Senior Special Counsel, at 

(202) 551-6825 (Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel’s Office).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For Applicants’ representations, legal analysis, and 

conditions, please refer to Applicants’ application, dated March 27, 2024, which may be 

obtained via the Commission’s website by searching for the file number at the top of this 

document, or for an Applicant using the Company name search field on the SEC’s EDGAR 

system. The SEC’s EDGAR system may be searched at 

https://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/legacy/companysearch.html. You may also call the 

SEC’s Public Reference Room at (202) 551-8090.

For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, under delegated 

authority.

Sherry R. Haywood,

Assistant Secretary.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

September 22, 2015 

MEMORANDUM 

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY 

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION 

SUBJECT: Audrey III Terrestrial Plant Modeling for Sulfonylurea Chemicals 

FROM: Margaret Hathaway, Chemical Review Manager 

Cathryn Britton, Team Leader 

Risk Management and Implementation Branch 2 

Pesticide Re-evaluation Division 

THRU: Kevin Costello, Branch Chief 

Risk Management and Implementation Branch 2 and 4 

Pesticide Re-evaluation Division 

TO: Sulfonylurea Registration Review Public Dockets: 

Bensulfuron-methyl (EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0663) 

Chlorimuron-ethyl (EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-04 78) 

Chlorsulfuron (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0878) 

Flazasulfuron (EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0994) 

Foramsulfuron (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0387) 

Halosulfuron-methyl (EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0745) 

Imazosulfuron (EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0625) 

Iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0717) 

Mesosulfuron-methyl (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0833) 

Metsulfuron-methyl (EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0375) 

Nicosulfuron (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-03 72) 

Orthosulfamuron (EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0438) 

Primisulfuron-methyl (EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0844) 

Prosulfuron (EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-1010) 

Rimsulfuron (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0178) 

Sulfometuron-methyl (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0433) 

Sulfosulfuron (EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0434) 

Thifensulfuron-methyl (EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0171) 

Triasulfuron (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0115) 

Tribenuron-methyl (EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0626) 

Trifloxysulfuron-Sodium (EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0409) 

Triflusulfuron-methyl (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0605) 
The Office of Pesticide Programs is developing a model for estimating exposure to terrestrial 

plants called Audrey III. Audrey III is based on a new conceptual model and uses EPA' s 

Pesticide Root Zone Model (PRZM) to estimate runoff of a treated field onto a Plant Exposure 

Zone (PEZ) where it is combined with loading from spray drift. 

The current, provisional version of Audrey III is run in a spreadsheet using the equations 

described in Appendices G and Hof EPA's ecological risk assessment for sulfonylurea 

chemicals ("Preliminary Ecological Risk Assessment for Registration Review of 22 Sulfonylurea 

Herbicides" August 26, 2015). This document is publically available in the 22 sulfonylurea 

chemical dockets listed above. 

Due to file size, this collection of modelling runs is not available directly through 

Regulations.gov. Members of the public interested in obtaining the Audrey III data files should 

contact the OPP Docket to receive them via CD-ROM at (703) 305-5805. 

Kevin Costello 

Branch Chief 

Risk Management and Implementation Branches 

2and4 

Pesticide Re-evaluation Division 

Office of Pesticide Programs
#### Robert G. Elbert, Appellant, v. Village of North Hills et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.