alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 588/2005

of 15 April 2005         

amending Regulation (EC) No 1002/2004 accepting undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of potassium chloride originating in the Republic of Belarus, the Russian Federation or Ukraine

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not member of the European Communities (1) (the basic Regulation) and in particular Article 8 thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 992/2004 (2) of 17 May 2004 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3068/92 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of potassium chloride originating in Belarus, Russia or Ukraine and in particular Article 1 thereof,

After consulting the Advisory Committee,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1002/2004 shall be amended as follows:

‘Article 1

The undertakings offered by the exporting producers mentioned below, in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of potassium chloride originating in the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation are hereby accepted.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 April 2005.

For the Commission

Peter MANDELSON            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1. Regulation, as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 461/2004 (OJ L 77, 13.3.2004, p. 12).

(2)OJ L 182, 19.5.2004, p. 23.

(3)OJ L 308, 24.10.1992, p. 41. Regulation, as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 992/2004 (OJ L 182, 19.5.2004, p. 23).

(4)OJ L 112, 11.5.2000, p. 4. Corrigendum: OJ L 2, 5.1.2001, p. 42.

(5)OJ C 70, 20.3.2004, p. 15.

(6)OJ L 183, 20.5.2004, p. 16.

----
Stewart D. Gregg, Second VP & Senior Counsel
Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
5701 Golden Hills Drive
Minneapolis, MN 554162
(763) 765-2913

April 28, 2004

Board of Directors
Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
5701 Golden Hills Drive
Minneapolis, MN 55416-1297

Re:     Opinion and Consent of Counsel
        Allianz Life Variable Account B

Dear Sir or Madam:

You have requested my Opinion of Counsel in connection  with the filing with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended,of a Post-Effective Amendment No.29 to a Registration Statement on Form
N-4 for the  Individual  Deferred  Variable  Annuity  Contracts  to be issued by
Allianz  Life  Insurance  Company of North  America  and its  separate  account,
Allianz Life Variable Account B.

I am of the following opinions:

1.   Allianz Life Variable  Account B is a unit investment trust as that term is
     defined in Section 4(2) of the Investment  Company Act of 1940 (the "Act"),
     and is currently  registered  with the Securities and Exchange  Commission,
     pursuant to Section 8(a) of the Act.

2.   Under the  acceptance of purchase  payments made by an Owner  pursuant to a
     Contract  issued  in  accordance  with  the  Prospectus  contained  in  the
     Registration  Statement and upon  compliance  with  applicable law, such an
     Owner will have a legally-issued,  fully-paid,  non-assessable  contractual
     interest under such Contract.

You  may  use  this  opinion  letter,  or  copy  hereof,  as an  exhibit  to the
Registration Statement.

I consent to the reference under the caption "Legal  Opinions"  contained in the
Statement  of  Additional  Information  which  forms a part of the  Registration
Statement.

Sincerely,


By: /s/ Stewart D. Gregg
----------------------------------
        Stewart D. Gregg
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 4.5

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                          1997 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
                                       OF
                             CORRPRO COMPANIES, INC.


WHEREAS, the Company previously adopted the 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan of
Corrpro Companies, Inc., (as hereby amended, the "Plan").

WHEREAS, effective June 19, 1998, the Company effected a 5-for-4 stock split in
the form of a 25% share dividend (the "Stock Split").

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15 of the Plan, the number of Shares subject to the
Plan, the number of Shares subject to awards, and other applicable provisions of
the Plan have been adjusted by the Committee to take into account the effect of
the Stock Split.

WHEREAS, the Company desires to increase the number of Common Shares reserved
for issuance under the Plan by 300,000 Shares.

WHEREAS, this amendment reflects the effect of the Stock Split.

NOW, THEREFORE, effective July 22, 1998, the Plan, is hereby amended as follows:

         The first sentence of Section 3, "Stock Subject to the Plan" is deleted
         and replaced with the following:

         There will be reserved for use, upon the issuance, vesting or exercise
         of Awards to be granted from time to time under the Plan, an aggregate
         of (i) seven hundred sixty-eight thousand seven hundred fifty (768,750)
         new Shares, and (ii) eight hundred sixteen thousand nine hundred
         eighty-eight (816,988) Shares subject to stock options (other than
         under the 1994 Corrpro Outside Directors' Stock Option Plan) granted
         prior to the Effective Date but only to the extent of the surrender,
         lapse, expiration, forfeiture, termination or exercise of such options,
         which Shares may be, in whole or in part, as the Board shall from time
         to time determine, authorized but unissued Shares, or issued Shares
         which shall have been reacquired by the Company.


                                                Corrpro Companies, Inc.

                                                /s/ Neal R. Restivo
                                                ---------------------------
                                                By: Neal R. Restivo
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Hiroaki Nakanishi, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Hitachi, Ltd. as amended by Amendment No.1 thereto; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                        |  |     |  |                                
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------
|Date:     July 29, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Hiroaki Nakanishi          
|                        |  |     |  | Name:         Hiroaki Nakanishi
|                        |  |     |  | Title:           President
EXHIBIT 99.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sun Asset Holdings,  Corp.  (formerly
Coyote Canyon  corporation)  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002,
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Daniel L. Hodges, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Daniel L. Hodges
Daniel L. Hodges
Chief Executive Officer
March 10, 2003
#### Tench of New York, Inc., Respondent, v. Austin Company et al., Respondents, and Reliance Marine Transportation and Construction Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

Settle order on notice. Present—Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.
§ 251.3 Departure manifests and lists for vessels. ( a ) *Form I-418, Passenger List-Crew List.* Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the master or agent of every vessel departing from the United States directly to some foreign place or outlying possession of the United States must electronically submit the data elements required on Form I-418 via an electronic data interchange system approved by CBP, except when a manifest is not required pursuant to section 251.1(a). Submission of inaccurate or incomplete data will be regarded as lack of compliance with section 251(c) of the Act.
( b ) *Exception for certain Great Lakes vessels.* The required list need not be submitted for Canadian or British crewmembers of Great Lakes vessels described in § 251.1(a)(3).
( c ) *Exception to the requirement to submit Form I-418 data elements electronically.* The master or agent of any vessel that is departing from the United States directly to some foreign place or outlying possession of the United States, and is required to submit a manifest, may submit a paper Form I-418 to CBP at the port from which such vessel is to depart when: ( 1 ) The master or agent of the vessel is unable to submit the data elements required on Form I-418 electronically via an electronic data interchange system approved by CBP because there is no internet access in that location or onboard computers are experiencing technical difficulties, and there is no shore-side support available; or
( 2 ) CBP is experiencing technical difficulties affecting its receipt or processing of electronically submitted information, or, in its discretion, CBP determines that a paper Form I-418 is acceptable under the circumstances presented by the master or agent of a vessel.
[62 FR 10387, Mar. 6, 1997, as amended at 86 FR 73630, Dec. 28, 2021]
Exhibit 32.1(b)



Section 906 Certification by the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Each of Stephen J. Schoepfer, Chief Executive
Officer, and Stephen J. Schoepfer, Chief Financial Officer, of Carbonics Capital Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”)
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge:



| | (1) | This Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012 (“Form 10-Q”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-Q, as amended, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                           |  |                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                           |  |                                                           
|                                                           |  |                                                           
|/s/ Stephen J. Schoepfer                                   |  | /s/ Stephen J. Schoepfer                                  
|                                                           |  |                                                           
|                                                           |  |                                                           
|Name: Stephen J. Schoepfer
 Title: Chief Executive Officer |  | Name: Stephen J. Schoepfer 
Title: Chief Financial Officer
|                                                           |  |                                                           
|                                                           |  |                                                           
|Date: June 29, 2012                                        |  |
§ 94.31 Application procedures. ( a ) To receive reimbursement, a claimant must submit a completed application under this program requesting payment based on an itemized list of expenses, and must submit original receipts.
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this Section, in cases involving incidents of terrorism preceding the establishment of this program where claimants may not have original receipts, and in cases in which the claimant certifies that the receipts have been destroyed or lost, the Director may, in his discretion, accept an itemized list of expenses. In each such case, the claimant must certify that original receipts are unavailable and attest that the items and amounts submitted in the list are true and correct to the best of his knowledge. In the event that it is later determined that a fraudulent certification was made, the United States may take action to recover any payment made under this section, and pursue criminal prosecution, as appropriate.
EXHIBIT 32.01

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Ocean  Power
Corporation  (the  "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
Michael Hopper, as Authorized Signatory of the Company,  certifies,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ MICHAEL HOPPER
---------------------------
Name:   Michael Hopper
Title:  Authorized Signatory
Date:   January 31, 2008

This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### § 232.3 Arriving aliens.

When a district director has reasonable grounds for believing that persons arriving in the United States should be detained for reasons specified in section 232 of the Act, he or she shall, after consultation with the United States Public Health Service at the port-of-entry, notify the master or agent of the arriving vessel or aircraft of his or her intention to effect such detention by serving on the master or agent Form I-259 in accordance with § 235.3(a) of this chapter.

[62 FR 10353, Mar. 6, 1997]
### §698l. Review of Big Cypress Preserve area and Addition area by Secretary; report to President

Within five years from October 11, 1974, with respect to the preserve and five years from April 29, 1988, with respect to the Addition, the Secretary shall review the area within the preserve or the area within the Addition (as the case may be) and shall report to the President, in accordance with section 1132(c) and (d) of this title, his recommendations as to the suitability or nonsuitability of any area within the preserve or the area within the Addition (as the case may be) for preservation as wilderness, and any designation of any such areas as a wilderness shall be accomplished in accordance with section 1132(c) and (d) of this title.

(Pub. L. 93–440, §7, Oct. 11, 1974, 88 Stat. 1261; Pub. L. 100–301, §3(c), Apr. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 444.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–301 inserted "with respect to the preserve and five years from April 29, 1988, with respect to the Addition" after "October 11, 1974," and "or the area within the Addition (as the case may be)" after "preserve" in two places.
### §470q. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 89–665, title II, §209, as added Pub. L. 94–422, title II, §201(9), Sept. 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 1322, related to exemption of Council from certain laws. See section 304105(i), (j) of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
EXHIBIT 32.2





Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Teliphone Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10–Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George Metrakos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ George MetrakosGeorge Metrakos

Principal Financial and Accounting Officer





Dated: June 10, 2010
----

            COUNCIL DECISION 2005/848/EC

of 29 November 2005         

implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Decision 2005/722/EC

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 of 27 December 2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (1), and in particular Article 2(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The list provided for in Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 shall be replaced by the following:

Article 2

Decision 2005/722/EC is hereby repealed.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall take effect on the day of its publication.

Done at Brussels, 29 November 2005.

For the Council

The President

A. JOHNSON            

----

(1)OJ L 344, 28.12.2001, p. 70. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1207/2005 (OJ L 197, 28.7.2005, p. 16).

(2)OJ L 272, 18.10.2005, p. 15, and Corrigendum (OJ L 276, 21.10.2005, p. 70).

----
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 95642 / August 31, 2022

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-16729

In the Matter of

MILLER ENERGY RESOURCES, 

INC., PAUL W. BOYD, CPA, 

DAVID M. HALL, and CARLTON 

W. VOGT, III, CPA ,

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-18110

In the Matter of

KPMG LLP and JOHN 

RIORDAN, CPA,

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

On May 4, 2022, the Commission issued an Omnibus Order Directing the Engagement of 

Two Tax Administrators for Appointment on a Case-By-Case Basis in Administrative 

Proceedings that Establish Distribution Funds (the “Omnibus Order”).1 The Omnibus Order 

engaged Miller Kaplan Arase LLP and Heffler, Radetich & Saitta, LLP to serve as a 

Commission tax administrator (“Tax Administrator”), for selection and appointment on an 

individual case basis, for calendar years 2022 through 2024 in administrative proceedings where 

the distribution fund may incur tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) 

under the Department of the Treasury Regulation 1.468B-1(c). 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 94845 (May 4, 2022).
2

The Director of the Division of Enforcement is authorized to appoint a Tax Administrator 

pursuant to the Omnibus Order.2 The Commission staff has requested the appointment of 

Heffler, Radetich & Saitta, LLP as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced 

proceeding.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the Omnibus Order, Heffler, Radetich & 

Saitta, LLP is appointed as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.3

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

2

 See Delegation of Authority to Director of the Division of Enforcement, Securities Act Rel. No. 10900 (Dec. 10, 

2020).

3

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(ii).
#### Elizabeth Figueroa, Appellant, v Jose Castillo et al., Respondents.

[825 NYS2d 43]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Nelson S. Roman, J.), entered December 22, 2005, which granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants’ submissions included excerpts from plaintiff’s deposition, as well as medical reports by plaintiffs doctors, and described another automobile accident one month before the *354subject accident, wherein she sustained similar knee and back injuries, and a fall on the same knee subsequent to the latest accident. These established additional contributing factors, intermpting the chain of causation between the subject accident and claimed injury, thereby shifting the burden of proof to plaintiff *(Pommells v Perez,*4 NY3d 566, 572 [2005]; *Franchini v Palmieri,*1 NY3d 536 [2003]). Plaintiffs experts failed to address how her current medical problems were causally related to the subject accident, in light of her past medical history *(see Style v Joseph,*32 AD3d 212, 214 [2006]; *Carter v Full Serv., Inc.,*29 AD3d 342 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 709 [2006]; *Montgomery v Pena,*19 AD3d 288 [2005]). Furthermore, the reports of defendants’ experts sufficed to establish that plaintiff had not suffered a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), and plaintiffs submissions failed to raise an issue of fact in that regard (see *Perez v Rodriguez, 25*AD3d 506 [2006]; *Suarez v Abe, 4*AD3d 288 [2004]). Concur—Friedman, J.E, Sullivan, Nardelli, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
#### § 661.13 How long are these funds available?

TTFBP funds for each fiscal year are available for obligation for the year authorized plus 3 years (a total of 4 years).
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

In Re: 

Juan C Huezo Case # 16-14182-KHK 

REPORT OF DEPOSIT OF UNCLAIMED FUNDS 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3011 and 11 U.S.C. 347, the trustee 

herein submits a check, or checks, payable to the “Clerk, United States Bankruptcy Court” 

representing unclaimed funds to be deposited by the Clerk of the Court into the Treasury 

of the United States. Said funds are subject to withdrawal as provided by 28 U.S.C. 2042 

and shall not escheat under any state law. Unclaimed funds represent the dividend(s) due 

and payable to the entity identified as the original payee on the face of the enclosed 

check(s). 

PAYEE 

JUAN C HUEZO 

9205 Andrew Drive 

Manassas, VA 20111 

AMOUNT 

$2,225.28 

Dated: January 31, 2018 __/s/Thomas P. Gorman ___________ 

Thomas P. Gorman 

300 North Washington Street, Ste. 400 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

(703) 836-2226 

VSB#26421 

Case 16-14182-KHK Doc 53 Filed 01/31/18 Entered 01/31/18 11:23:13 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1