alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of LegalPlay  Entertainment Inc. on form
10-QSB for the period  ended  March 31,  2006 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Page, Director of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



May 19, 2006                 /s/ John Page
-------------------          ------------------------------------------------
(Date)                       John Page
                             Director / Treasurer
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of New Mexico Software, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer and the principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date:  November 14, 2006

 

/s/ Richard Govatski

Richard Govatski, President

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

/s/ Teresa Dickey

Teresa Dickey, Treasurer

(Principal Financial Officer)
§ 1300.40 Expiration of the annual grant application. ( a ) The State's annual grant application for a fiscal year and the State's authority to incur costs under that application shall expire on the last day of the fiscal year.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, each State shall submit a final voucher which satisfies the requirements of § 1300.33(b) within 120 days after the expiration of the annual grant application. The final voucher constitutes the final financial reconciliation for each fiscal year.
( c ) The Regional Administrator may extend the time period by no more than 30 days to submit a final voucher only in extraordinary circumstances, consistent with 2 CFR 200.344 and 200.345. States shall submit a written request for an extension describing the extraordinary circumstances that necessitate an extension. The approval of any such request for extension shall be in writing, shall specify the new deadline for submitting the final voucher, and shall be signed by the Regional Administrator.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank of the United States

# ACTION:

Notice of a Partially Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

# TIME AND PLACE: 

Tuesday, March 29, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. The meeting will be held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.

# OPEN AGENDA ITEMS: 

Item No. 1: Local Cost Policy.

# PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: 

The meeting will be open to public observation for Item No. 1 only.

# FURTHER INFORMATION: 

For further information, contact: Office of the Secretary, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3957.

Jonathan J. Cordone,

Senior Vice President and General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2011-7122 Filed 3-23-11; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
§ 72.6 Information sex offenders must provide. Sex offenders must provide the following information for inclusion in the sex offender registries of the jurisdictions in which they are required to register: ( a ) *Name, date of birth, and Social Security number.* ( 1 ) The name of the sex offender, including any alias used by the sex offender.
( 2 ) The sex offender's date of birth and any date that the sex offender uses as his purported date of birth.
( 3 ) The Social Security number of the sex offender and any number that the sex offender uses as his purported Social Security number.
( b ) *Remote communication identifiers.* All designations the sex offender uses for purposes of routing or self-identification in internet or telephonic communications or postings, including email addresses and telephone numbers.
( c ) *Residence, temporary lodging, employment, and school attendance.* ( 1 ) The address of each residence at which the sex offender resides or will reside or, if the sex offender has no present or expected residence address, other information describing where the sex offender resides or will reside with whatever definiteness is possible under the circumstances.
( 2 ) Information about any place in which the sex offender is staying when away from his residence for seven or more days, including the identity of the place and the period of time the sex offender is staying there.
( 3 ) The name and address of any place where the sex offender is or will be an employee or, if the sex offender is or will be employed but with no fixed place of employment, other information describing where the sex offender works or will work with whatever definiteness is possible under the circumstances.
( 4 ) The name and address of any place where the sex offender is a student or will be a student.
( d ) *International travel.* Information relating to intended travel outside the United States, including any anticipated itinerary, dates and places of departure from, arrival in, or return to the United States and each country visited, carrier and flight numbers for air travel, destination country or countries and address or other contact information therein, and means and purpose of travel.
( e ) *Passports and immigration documents.* Information about each passport the sex offender has and, if the sex offender is an alien, information about any document or documents establishing the sex offender's immigration status, including passport or immigration document type and number.
( f ) *Vehicle information.* The license plate number and a description of any vehicle owned or operated by the sex offender, including watercraft and aircraft in addition to land vehicles. If a vehicle has no license plate but has some other type of registration number or identifier, then the registration number or identifier must be provided. Information must also be provided as to where any vehicle owned or operated by the sex offender is habitually parked, docked, or otherwise kept.
( g ) *Professional licenses.* Information concerning all licensing of the sex offender that authorizes the sex offender to engage in an occupation or carry out a trade or business.
### §616. Exportation of timber cut on national forest or public land in Alaska

Timber lawfully cut on any national forest, or on the public lands in Alaska, may be exported from the State or Territory where grown if, in the judgment of the Secretary of the department administering the national forests, or the public lands in Alaska, the supply of timber for local use will not be endangered thereby, and the respective Secretaries concerned are authorized to issue rules and regulations to carry out the purposes of this section.

(Apr. 12, 1926, §1, ch. 117, 44 Stat. 242.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Admission of Alaska as State

Admission of Alaska into the Union was accomplished Jan. 3, 1959, on issuance of Proc. No. 3269, Jan. 3, 1959, 24 F.R. 81, 73 Stat. c16, as required by sections 1 and 8(c) of Pub. L. 85–508, July 7, 1958, 72 Stat. 339, set out as notes preceding section 21 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
# C_2004300EN.01000601.xml

| 4.12.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/6

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(First Chamber)

of 14 October 2004

in Case C-113/02: Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands (1)

1

(Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 on the supervision and control of shipments of waste - Directive 75/442 on waste - National measure providing for objections to shipments of waste for recovery where 20 % of the waste is recoverable in the Member State and the percentage of waste recoverable in the country of destination is lower - Measure of a Member State classifying an operation under point R1 (recovery by incineration) of Annex IIB to Directive 75/442 or under point D10 (disposal by incineration) of Annex IIA to that directive not according to the criterion of actual use but according to the calorific value of the incinerated waste)

(2004/C 300/10)

Language of the case: Dutch

In Case C-113/02 — action under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 27 March 2002, Commission of the European Communities (Agents: H. van Lier, M. van der Woude and R. Wezenbeek-Geuke) against Kingdom of the Netherlands (Agent: H.G. Sevenster) — the Court (First Chamber), composed of: P. Jann, (Rapporteur) President of the Chamber, A. Rosas, R. Silva de Lapuerta, K. Lenaerts and S. von Bahr; F.G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgement on 14 October 2004, in which it:

| 1. | Declares that the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 of 1 February 1993 on the supervision and control of shipments of waste within, into and out of the European Community and under Article 1(e) and (f) of Council Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 on waste, as amended by Council Directive 91/156/EEC of 18 March 1991 and Commission Decision 96/350/EC of 24 May 1996; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 of 1 February 1993 on the supervision and control of shipments of waste within, into and out of the European Community and under Article 1(e) and (f) of Council Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 on waste, as amended by Council Directive 91/156/EEC of 18 March 1991 and Commission Decision 96/350/EC of 24 May 1996;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 144 of 15.6.2002.

1

---
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 23.9

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement of Hercules Incorporated on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-37279,
33-21668, 33-21667, 33-47664, 33-51178, 33-52621, 33-66136, 33-62314, 33-65352,
333-38795, 333-38797 and 333-68863) and on Form S-3 (Registration Nos. 333-63423
and 333-29225) of our report dated November 7, 2002, relating to our audits of
the consolidated financial statements of FiberVisions, Inc. and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000 and for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2001, which report is included in this Form
10-K/A.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
December 11, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7175]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Engineering; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Engineering Meeting, <greek-i>1170.
    Date/Time: April 13, 2011: 12 p.m. to 6 p.m., April 14, 2011: 8 
a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 
1235, Arlington, Virginia 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Deborah Young, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Suite 505, Arlington, Virginia 22230.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice, recommendations and 
counsel on major goals and policies pertaining to engineering 
programs and activities.
    Agenda: The principal focus of the meeting on both days will be 
to discuss emerging issues and opportunities for the Directorate for 
Engineering and its divisions and review Committee of Visitors 
Reports.

    Dated: March 23, 2011.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-7175 Filed 3-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### § 661.55 How are BIA and Tribally owned in-service TTF bridges inspected?

The BIA and Tribally owned in-service TTF bridges are inspected in accordance with 25 CFR 170.513 through 170.514.
#### In the Matter of Paulette C., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[828 NYS2d 3]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about October 7, 2005, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that she had committed acts, which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of criminal sexual act in the first degree (two counts), sexual abuse in the first, second and third degrees, coercion in the second degree and menacing in the third degree, and placed her in the custody of the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of up to 18 months, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the findings as to criminal sexual act in the first degree and sexual abuse in the third degree and dismissing those counts of the petition, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility.

The court properly permitted the seven-year-old victim to give sworn testimony since her voir dire responses, which were generally detailed and articulate, established that she sufficiently understood the difference between truth and falsity, the nature of a promise to tell the truth, and the wrongfulness and consequences of lying *(see People v Nisoff,*36 NY2d 560, 565-566 [1975]; *People v Cordero,*257 AD2d 372 [1999], *lv denied*93 NY2d 968 [1999]).

As the presentment agency concedes, the two counts of criminal sexual act in the first degree were jurisdictionally defective since there was no marking indicating that designated felony charges were included, and the third-degree sexual abuse count should have been dismissed as a lesser included offense.

Even with these modifications, we conclude that the 18-month placement is the least restrictive alternative consistent with appellant’s needs and the need for protection of the community *(see Matter of Katherine W.,*62 NY2d 947 [1984]), particularly in view of the seriousness of the offense, and appellant’s *396psychological evaluations. Concur—Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Sullivan, Nardelli and Malone, JJ.
SERVED: JUNE 24, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CALIBER JET CHARTER, LLC 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2015-1320 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2014EA390060) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 

~~-·-

{ 

\ 

\ 

,/ 

.· ~­

. --·--Ronme A. Yo er /,// 

Chief Administrativ~\V Judge 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Michael Asseff, Respondent's Counsel 

29550 Detroit Road 

Westlake, OH 44145 

TEL: 440-521-1658 

ONE COPY 

Judith L. Vaughan, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3255 

FAJ<: 718-995-5699 

Hon. J .E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

F AJ<: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2015-1320 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

 Division

In re 

 Debtor(s) Case No. 

 Chapter 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

 FOR FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE LISTS, SCHEDULES AND STATEMENTS 

The above debtor(s) having failed to timely file required lists, schedules and statements

within time periods as set forth in Local Rule 1007-1; it is, therefore 

ORDERED, pursuant to Local Rule 1007-1, that the above case be dismissed; and it is 

further

[If appropriate] ORDERED that the debtor(s) pay the balance of the filing fee in the 

amount of $ _________________ to the Clerk of Court within 14 days of the date of this 

order; and it is further 

ORDERED that dismissal of this case revests the property of the estate in the entity in which 

such property was vested immediately before the commencement of the case. The trustee need not 

file a final report in this case unless property or money was administered. 

WILLIAM C. REDDEN 

Clerk of Court 

Date: ____________________ By _______________________________________ 

 Deputy Clerk 

 NOTICE OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER 

 ENTERED ON DOCKET: 

 _______________________________

 [odisflss ver. 12/09]

Norfolk

Thomas Lee Cole

16-71348-SCS

7

335.00

May 06, 2016 /s/LaTanya Gibbs

May 06, 2016

Case 16-71348-SCS Doc 22 Filed 05/06/16 Entered 05/06/16 07:39:09 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-10047

No. 95-10076

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

HECTOR ALFREDO MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

* * * * * * * * *

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

JAIRO MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

(3:94-CR-043-R)

May 21, 1996

Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
 

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

2

Per curiam:*

Appellants Jairo Martinez and Hector Martinez challenge their

convictions based the district court's refusal to allow them to

withdraw their guilty pleas at the sentencing hearing. We affirm.

Hector Martinez argues that the district court should have

allowed him to withdraw his plea of guilty because he repudiated

the plea before it was formally accepted by the district court. He

did not make this argument before the district court. Hector

Martinez sought to withdraw his plea to misprision of a felony on

the ground he had not engaged in the related conspiracy. We find

no plain error in the district court's refusal to allow appellant

to withdraw his plea. See United States v. Calverly, 37 F.3d 160,

162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1266

(1995).

Jairo Martinez argues that the district court should have

allowed him to withdraw his plea of guilty because his counsel

failed to advise him that an amendment to the sentencing

guidelines, which became effective after he entered his plea, made

his plea bargain less desirable. Unlike Hector Martinez, Jairo

Martinez addressed his claim to the district court. When, as here,

a defendant is aware of his potential prison term, his plea is not

involuntary simply because he misunderstands the Sentencing

Guidelines' effect upon the computation of his sentence. United

States v. Young, 981 F.2d 180, 184 (5th Cir. 1992), cert. denied,

113 S. Ct. 2454, 2983 (1993). We find no abuse of discretion in

the district court's denial of Jairo Martinez's motion to withdraw

his plea.

Finally, Jairo Martinez argues that double jeopardy bars his
3

prosecution because he stipulated to a forfeiture pursuant to 21

U.S.C. § 881(a)(6). This contention is without merit. See United

States v. Tilley, 18 F.3d 1295 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct.

573 (1994).

For the foregoing reasons, the convictions of Hector Martinez

and Jairo Martinez are AFFIRMED.