alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Walnut  Valley  Ventures,
Inc.,  on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31,  2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 140.900 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to prescribe policies and procedures on reimbursement to the States for railroad work done on projects undertaken pursuant to the provisions of 23 CFR part 646, subpart B.
### JUN 78 2fl12 OFFICE OF THE €XECUTIVE SECRETARIAT Message Information Date 06/26/2012 06:41 PM From Arielle Rosen <arosen©credomobile.com > To LisaP Jackson/DC/USEPAIUS@EPA 221,870 Americans say "Ban the pesticide that's killing bees!"

Lisa Jackson, Administrator The Environmental Protection Agency Ariel Rios Building 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW. Washington, DC 20004 Dear Ms. Jackson: I am writing to deliver the signatures of 221,870 Americans who have signed a petition with the following text: "The EPA must take action to stop the alarming rate of bee die-offs. Please protect bees and our food system by immediately banning the use of the pesticide Clothianidin, pending a full review of its safety." Your agency is considering an Emergency Citizen Petition right now that seeks suspension of the insecticide clothianidin, the petition filed with you on March 20 by 25 beekeepers and four consumer and environmental groups (EPA-HQ-OPP-201 2-0334). Please take advantage of this opportunity to protect pollinators from pesticides. Honey bees and other insect pollinators are dying off at unprecedented, catastrophic rates and pesticides are a clear causal factor. This cannot be allowed to continue, and you can do something about it. As the EPA makes a decision on the use of the pesticide Clothianidin, these petition signers urge you to consider this bee die-off as an emergency, and ban this pesticide that's killing bees. You can download the full list of signers at http://act.credoaction.com/pdfs/EPA Bees Petition Signatu res20 120626. pdf If you have any questions about these signatures, please don't hesitate to contact me through the information provided below.Sincerely,

Elijah Zarlin Campaign Manager, CREDO Action 415-369-2000

OEX Processing Information Processed Date: Processed By P0 Office Message Count
1

Wiley, Adina

From: Magee, Melanie

Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 11:29 AM

To: Fanning, Cynthia; Wiley, Adina

Cc: Robinson, Jeffrey

Subject: FW: Cedar Bayou 5 and SR Bertron 5 GHG air permit applications

Cindy, Found it!

Adina, I don't think I sent this to you.  Glad Cindy asked me about these two!

‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ 

From: Eckberg, Craig [mailto:Craig.Eckberg@nrgenergy.com]  

Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 2:40 PM

To: Magee, Melanie

Cc: 'derek.mcdonald@bakerbotts.com'

Subject: Cedar Bayou 5 and SR Bertron 5 GHG air permit applications

Hi Melanie, as we discussed in today's meeting,  NRG requests that both the Cedar Bayou 5 and SR Bertron 5 GHG air

permit applications be transferred to TCEQ at the appropriate time.   I appreciate your work on these projects so far, and

understand that no additional EPA review will occur on these applications.

Tks.,

Craig
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7516
VIRGIL ATWELL MOTLEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus CHARLES E. THOMPSON, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-635-7) Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 13, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Virgil Atwell Motley, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Virgil Atwell Motley seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Motley has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , U.S. , 2003 WL 431659 (U.S. Feb. 25, 2003) (No. 01-7662), at *10. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Are made of fabric that 

makes it hard to breathe, 

for example, vinyl

Have exhalation valves 

or vents, which allow 

virus particles to escape

Are intended for 

healthcare workers, 

including N95 respirators 

or surgical masks

CS 319876-O 10/16/2020

DO NOT choose masks that

cdc.gov/coronavirus
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00479

- CR

C HAD P IERCE C OFFEY

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 213th District Court

of Tarrant C ounty (1543453D)

February 28, 2019

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRI CT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
# CE2004065EN.01018901.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/189 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/189

---

(2004/C 65 E/206)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2679/03

by Jacques Poos (PSE) to the Commission

(10 September 2003)

Subject:   Customs union between Turkey and the pseudo-state, the TRNC

Subject:

Can the Commission indicate whether the framework customs union agreement signed by Turkey and the pseudo-state of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) is compatible with the Customs Union Agreement in force since 1996 between the European Union and Turkey?

Under this agreement, customs duties were abolished and Turkey is required to apply the Common Customs Tariff to all imports from third countries.

If, however, the TRNC, according to the definition of the European Court of Human Rights, is not a third country, but a province of the Republic of Cyprus, temporarily under Turkish occupation and administration, is the Commission not obliged to make sure that all exports to the EU from the occupied area are accompanied by certificates of origin issued by the island's recognised authorities?

Can the Commission guarantee that Turkish exports to the EU comply with the signed agreement? If not, what does the Commission intend to do to ensure compliance with the law?

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7698

IRVING TILGHMAN, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-98-3014-WMN) Submitted: April 29, 1999 Decided: May 4, 1999 Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Irving Tilghman, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is signed and date stamped on November 3, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on November 6, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Irving Tilghman, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Tilghman v. Corcoran , No. CA-98-3014-WMN (D. Md. Nov. 6, 1998). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Ronald NELSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Steven J. GAL, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-6310.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 17, 2002.

Decided May 9, 2002.

*125Ronald Nelson, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Nelson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Nelson v. Gal,*No. CA-01-4588-2-22-AJ (D.S.C. filed Jan. 30, entered Jan. 31, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
COVID-19 Related Operational Issues 

Update to May 27, 2020 SEC AMAC Discussion 

• The May 27, 2020, AMAC meeting focused on operational issues relating to critic

management and brokerage processes that arose at the onset of the pandemic. The p

highlighted a diverse set of operational challenges and potential solutions for the AMAC 

SEC to consider and address.

• A working group of AMAC members have continued to pursue a list of areas in whic

ultimately might recommend the SEC consider more permanent relief/improvement to 

and attendant processes that posed either a safety/personal health risk during this p

period, and/or exposed operational inefficiencies in a protracted work-from-home po

industry stakeholders.

• Care continues to be taken in order to flag those areas for consideration for which ther

attribution back to pandemic-related issues or concerns.

• Several temporary measures taken by the SEC (and others) were highly effective and 

recommended as permanent changes.

• The topics that follow will be the primary basis of our discussion on September 16, 2020
eDelivery 

This Category is an area of focus at the SEC • Scope and timing of a 

move to ‘default’ of eDelivery vs. paper 

• Principles to keep top of 

mind (e.g., investor protection) 

COVID-19 Related Operational Issues 

Update to May 27, 2020 SEC AMAC Discussion 

Five Primary Categories of Permanent Improvement to Consider and Discuss 

Remote 

Work 

This broader theme includes sub-categories that can be pursued simultaneously or individually to make permanent existing temporary relief and/or leverage technology • Remote supervision • In-person Board meetings 

under ‘40 Act. 

• Leveraging technology for 

exams/inspections 

• Remote testing/licensing 

eAuthorization 

These policy changes would allow for permanent adoption of digitized methods of authorization (and may require coordination with states in certain circumstances) • Alternatives to signature 

medallions 

• Elimination of wet 

signatures 

• eNotarization 

Dematerialization 

This Category may contain a spectrum of 

recommendations given its complexity and multiple stakeholders 

• A constructive first step 

could be the SEC convening a roundtable of such stakeholders 
COVID-19 Related Operational Issues 

Sample Questions/Issues to Consider During AMAC Discussion: 

• Are there additional areas that should be considered?

• Do the above considerations strike the right balance?

• How would—or should– the AMAC prioritize the areas to recommend to the SEC (to th

the AMAC feels a prioritization is necessary/prudent)?
### §6706. Monitoring and evaluation

#### (a) In general

Not later than 5 years after October 5, 2004, and every 5 years thereafter, the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, shall complete and submit to the Committee on Resources and the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a detailed evaluation of the programs and activities of each Institute—

(1) to ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, that the research, communication tools, and information transfer activities of each Institute are sufficient to achieve the purposes of this chapter, including—

(A) implementing active adaptive ecosystem management practices at the landscape level;

(B) reducing unnecessary planning costs;

(C) avoiding duplicative and conflicting efforts;

(D) increasing public acceptance of active adaptive ecosystem management practices; and

(E) achieving general satisfaction on the part of affected entities;

(2) to determine the extent to which each Institute has implemented its duties under section 6704(c) of this title; and

(3) to determine whether continued provision of Federal assistance to each Institute is warranted.

#### (b) Termination of assistance

If, as a result of an evaluation under subsection (a), the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, determines that an Institute does not qualify for further Federal assistance under this chapter, the Institute shall receive no further Federal assistance under this chapter until such time as the qualifications of the Institute are reestablished to the satisfaction of the Secretaries.

(Pub. L. 108–317, §7, Oct. 5, 2004, 118 Stat. 1209.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Resources of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Natural Resources of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Tenth Congress, Jan. 5, 2007.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant


                                      119
<PAGE>   2


Subsidiaries of the registrant.

Th following table sets forth the subsidiaries of the Company on December 31,
2000.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Company                                  State of Incorporation                 DBA's
-------                                  ----------------------                 -----
<S>                                      <C>                                    <C>
Ablest Service Corp.                     Delaware                               Ablest Staffing Services
                                                                                Ablest Technology Services
                                                                                ATS

Milestone Technologies, Inc.             Arizona                                Ablest Technology Services

PLP Corp.                                Alabama
</TABLE>

On January 1, 2001 the above listed subsidiaries were combined, through merger,
into Ablest Inc.


                                      120
#### § 2.79 Good time forfeiture.

Although a forfeiture of good time will not bar a prisoner from receiving a parole hearing, D.C. Code 24-404 permits the Commission to parole only those prisoners who have substantially observed the rules of the institution. Consequently, the Commission will consider a grant of parole for a prisoner with forfeited good time only after a thorough review of the circumstances underlying the disciplinary infraction(s). The Commission must be satisfied that the prisoner has served a period of imprisonment sufficient to outweigh the seriousness of the prisoner's misconduct.

[65 FR 45888, July 26, 2000, as amended at 68 FR 41531, July 14, 2003]
### §433e. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–141, §7(b), Oct. 31, 1983, 97 Stat. 910

Section, acts June 2, 1936, ch. 477, §5, 49 Stat. 1395; Oct. 26, 1972, Pub. L. 92–568, §1, 86 Stat. 1181, provided that employees of the Perry's Victory Memorial Commission on June 2, 1936, could, in the discretion of the Secretary of the Interior, be employed by the National Park Service in the administration, protection, and development of the memorial.
<PAGE>   1
                                  Exhibit 23.01

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-36599, 33-61233, 33-61231, 33-21352 and 2-98101) pertaining
to the Stock Option and Incentive Plans of Grey Global Group Inc. of our report
dated February 16, 2001 on the consolidated financial statements of Grey Global
Group Inc. and consolidated subsidiary companies included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.






                                                             ERNST & YOUNG LLP


New York, New York
March 30, 2001
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Hawkins, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended April 1, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marvin E. Dee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Marvin E. DeeMarvin E. DeeChief Financial OfficerJune 15, 2007


---
#### Sophie D. Cohen, Respondent and Appellant, v. Eleanor C. Hughes, Appellant and Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel; Neurophysiological and Pain Management with CAM Treatments.                    

*Date:*                         April 5, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call)                    

*Contact Person:*                         Hungyi Shau, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-1030,                         *Hungyi.Shau@nih.gov.*

This meeting is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting date due to scheduling conflicts.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 21, 2011.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-7199 Filed 3-25-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P