Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 17341 

have concluded this action is one of a 

category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule is categorically 

excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph 

(34)(h), of the Instruction. This rule 

involves a special local regulation to 

establish vessel movement restrictions 

in designated race areas immediately 

prior to, during and immediately 

following permitted hydroplane race 

events. An environmental analysis 

checklist and a categorical exclusion 

determination are available in the 

docket where indicated under 

ADDRESSES. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100 

Marine safety, Navigation (water). 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 100 as follows: 

PART 100—REGATTAS AND MARINE 

PARADES 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 100 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233. 

■ 2. Add § 100.1308 to read as follows: 

§ 100.1308 Special Local Regulation; 

Hydroplane Races within the Captain of the 

Port Puget Sound Area of Responsibility. 

(a) Location. The following areas are 

designated race areas for the purpose of 

reoccurring hydroplane races: 

(1) Dyes Inlet. West of Port Orchard, 

WA to include all waters north to land 

from a line connecting the following 

points 47°37.36′ N, 122°42.29′ W and 

47°37.74′ N, 122°40.64′ W (NAD 1983). 

(2) Lake Washington. South of the 

Interstate 90 bridge and north of 

Andrew’s Bay to include all waters east 

of the shoreline within the following 

points: 47°34.15′ N, 122°16.40′ W; 

47°34.31′ N, 122°15.96′ W; 47°35.18′ N, 

122°16.31′ W; 47°35.00′ N, 122°16.71′ W 

(NAD 1983). 

(3) Lake Sammamish. South to land 

from a line connecting the following 

points 47°33.810′ N, 122°04.810′ W and 

47°33.810′ N, 122° 03.674′ W (NAD 

1983). 

(b) Notice of enforcement or 

suspension of enforcement. This special 

local regulation will be activated and 

thus subject to enforcement, under the 

following conditions: the Coast Guard 

must receive and approve a marine 

event permit for each hydroplane event 

in accordance with 33 CFR 100. The 

Captain of the Port will provide notice 

of the enforcement of this special local 

regulation by all appropriate means to 

ensure the widest dissemination among 

the affected segments of the public, as 

practicable; such means of notification 

may include but are not limited to, 

Broadcast Notice to Mariners or Local 

Notice to Mariners. 

(c) Regulations. (1) When this special 

local regulation is enforced, nonparticipant vessels are prohibited from 

entering the designated race areas 

unless authorized by the designated onscene Patrol Commander. Spectator craft 

may remain in designated spectator 

areas but must follow the directions of 

the designated on-scene Patrol 

Commander. The event sponsor may 

also function as the designated on-scene 

Patrol Commander. Spectator craft 

entering, exiting or moving within the 

spectator area must operate at speeds 

which will create a minimum wake. 

(2) Emergency signaling. A succession 

of sharp, short signals by whistle or 

horn from vessels patrolling the areas 

under the discretion of the designated 

on-scene Patrol Commander shall serve 

as a signal to stop. Vessels signaled shall 

stop and shall comply with the orders 

of the patrol vessel. Failure to do so may 

result in expulsion from the area, 

citation for failure to comply, or both. 

Dated: March 3, 2011. 

A.T. Ewalt, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting District 

Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7284 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 117 

Drawbridge Operation Regulations; 

Columbia River, OR 

CFR Correction 

In Title 33 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations, Parts 1 to 124, revised as of 

July 1, 2010, on page 624, in § 117.869, 

paragraph (d) is removed. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7441 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Forest Service 

36 CFR Part 294 

Idaho Roadless Rule 

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. 

ACTION: Final administrative correction. 

SUMMARY: The Forest Service, U.S. 

Department of Agriculture (USDA), is 

issuing administrative corrections 

affecting Big Creek Fringe, French 

Creek, Placer Creek, Secesh, and Smith 

Creek Idaho Roadless Areas on the 

Payette National Forest. These 

corrections remedy clerical errors 

relating to regulatory classifications 

involving two Forest Plan Special Areas 

(Big Creek and French Creek) and a 

mapping error. These corrections are 

made pursuant to 36 CFR 294.27(a). 

DATES: This correction is effective 

March 29, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Idaho Roadless Coordinator Joan 

Dickerson at 406–329–3314. Additional 

information concerning these 

administrative corrections, including 

the corrected maps, may be obtained on 

the Internet at http://roadless.fs.fed.us. 

Individuals who use telecommunication 

devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the 

Federal Information Relay Service 

(FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 between 

8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard 

Time, Monday through Friday. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Idaho 

Roadless Rule authorizes administrative 

corrections to the maps of lands 

identified in 36 CFR 294.22(c), 

including but not limited to, adjustment 

that remedy clerical errors, 

typographical errors, mapping errors, or 

improvements in mapping technology. 

The Chief may issue administrative 

corrections after a 30-day public notice 

and opportunity to comment. 

The Agency presented the corrections 

to the State of Idaho’s Roadless Rule 

Advisory Commission on September 28, 

2010. The Commission recommended to 

the Governor of Idaho that the 

corrections be made and that the 

Agency contact the Valley County 

Commissioners. The Valley County 

Commissioners supported the 

corrections. 

The Agency requested comment and/ 

or met with the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes 

of Duck Valley, the Shoshone-Bannock 

Tribes of Fort Hall, and the Nez Perce 

Tribe. No comments or concerns from 

the Tribes were received. 

Consideration of Comments 

The Chief provided a 30-day public 

notice and opportunity to comment (75 

FR 54542). A total of 13 comments were 

received from 9 individuals. 

Two respondents were concerned 

about the original classification of lands 

in the Big Creek Fringe, Placer Creek, 

Secesh and French Creek Roadless 

Areas. In addition these respondents 

were concerned about the original 

mapping of these roadless areas and felt 

the boundaries of the roadless areas 

should be modified to exclude existing 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
17342 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

disturbances (past harvesting and 

roads). These corrections only address 

the technical regulatory classification 

and mapping errors. The decisions on 

how to classify the management themes 

and the boundaries were made during 

the original rulemaking and are not 

being reassessed. 

Two respondents were concerned 

about travel planning, and other 

projects and activities on the Payette 

National Forest. These activities are 

outside the scope of the technical 

corrections assessed in this rulemaking. 

The comments have been forwarded to 

the Payette National Forest for their 

consideration. 

Two respondents were concerned 

about the maps provided for the 

corrections. They felt the maps were 

inadequate and lacked the necessary 

detail to understand the corrections. 

The maps posted on the Internet on 

September 8, 2010, were adequate to 

identify the proposed changes to each 

roadless area. However, in response to 

comments received, additional maps 

showing greater detail were posted on 

September 14, 2010. These maps show 

the roadless area corrections in relation 

to key points of interest (mountains, 

towns, main roads, etc). 

One respondent felt an Environmental 

Impact Statement (EIS) was warranted 

for the change, and another felt some 

level of effects analysis should be done. 

An EIS is not warranted for these errata 

corrections. The corrections have no 

effect on the analysis presented in the 

Roadless Area Conservation, National 

Forest System Lands in Idaho Final EIS 

and are simply technical corrections of 

labeling and mapping errors made in 

promulgation of the Idaho Roadless 

Rule. The corrections result in a net 

increase of 577 acres (600 acres 

rounded) in the Backcountry 

Restoration theme for a total of 

5,313,500 acres of Backcountry/ 

Restoration over all Idaho Roadless 

Areas. This is less than 0.01 percent 

change in the management 

classification. Site-specific analysis, 

including public involvement will be 

conducted for any future projects 

proposed in areas reclassified to 

Backcountry/Restoration. 

Questions were received concerning 

the correction for private land. The 

correction aligns the roadless boundary 

with the private land boundary. This 

was a mapping error which did not 

align (edge match) the roadless 

boundary with private land; this 

reduced the roadless area by 3 acres. 

Only National Forest System lands are 

included in the Roadless Area. 

One respondent identified two of 

typographical errors made in the 

Federal Register Notice. (1) Correction 

regarding French Creek. On page 54543, 

the Federal Register said ‘‘moving 1,000 

acres of Forest Plan Special Area to 

Backcountry Restoration’’. The 

respondent noted that the proposed 

correction should have stated ‘‘1,000 

acres of Backcountry Restoration would 

be moved to a Forest Plan Special 

Area’’. (2) On page 54543 for French 

Creek the township should be changed 

from Township 22N to Township 23N. 

These edits have been made. 

Four respondents, the Governor’s 

Commission, and Valley County 

Commissioners supported the 

corrections or did not have significant 

concerns with the proposed changes. 

These comments are noted. 

Corrections Regarding Big Creek 

The Idaho Roadless Rule and 

associated maps mistakenly identify Big 

Creek as a Forest Plan Special Area 

(Wild and Scenic River). During the 

Idaho rulemaking, Forest Plan Special 

Areas were identified where the 

management is governed by specific 

Agency directives and forest plan 

direction. The 2003 Southwest Idaho 

Ecogroup Land and Resource 

Management Plan Final Environmental 

Impact Statement (FEIS) included an 

eligibility study for Big Creek. The 

Agency’s Record of Decision found Big 

Creek in-eligible for Wild and Scenic 

River designation. As the Payette Forest 

Plan did not establish a special 

management area, the Idaho rulemaking 

and associated maps are now conformed 

to remove this erroneous classification. 

These corrections occur in T20N, R8E, 

sections 13–14 and 22–24; T20N, R9E, 

sections 2–3, 10, 15, and 17–18; T21N, 

R9E, sections 13, 23–24, 26, and 34–36, 

Boise Meridian. 

The four corrections concerning Big 

Creek are as follows: 

• Big Creek Fringe Idaho Roadless 

Area: 365 acres of Forest Plan Special 

Area are changed to Backcountry/ 

Restoration; and the boundary of the 

roadless area is aligned with the private 

land boundary decreasing the roadless 

area by 3 acres. The Forest Plan Special 

Area classification is removed in the 

rule. 

• Placer Creek Idaho Roadless Area: 

98 acres of Forest Plan Special Area are 

changed to Backcountry/Restoration; 

and 14 acres of Forest Plan Special Area 

are changed to Primitive. The Forest 

Plan Special Area classification is 

removed in the rule. 

• Secesh Idaho Roadless Area: 1,086 

acres of the 11,630 acre Forest Plan 

Special Area is changed to Backcountry/ 

Restoration. 

• Smith Creek Roadless Area: 14 

acres of Forest Plan Special Area is 

changed to Primitive. 

Correction Regarding French Creek 

The Idaho Roadless Rule erroneously 

did not identify an existing Forest Plan 

Special Area for the Lake Creek Wild 

and Scenic River Corridor in the French 

Creek Idaho Roadless Area. The 2003 

Southwest Idaho Ecogroup Land and 

Resource Management Plan Final 

Environmental Impact Statement 

included a suitability study for the 

Secesh River, including Lake Creek. The 

Record of Decision found the Secesh 

River, including Lake Creek, eligible for 

Wild and Scenic River designation and 

the Payette National Forest Land and 

Resource Management Plan established 

a Special Management Area. 

The associated maps have been 

corrected for this area. The correction 

moves 1,000 acres of Backcountry/ 

Restoration to Forest Plan Special Area 

and occurs in T23N, R4E, sections 10, 

15, 22, 26–27, and 35, Boise Meridian. 

List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 294 

National Forests, Navigation (air), 

Recreation areas, State petitions for 

inventoried roadless area management. 

For the reasons set forth in the 

preamble, part 294 of Title 36 of the 

Code of Federal Regulations is amended 

as follows: 

PART 294—SPECIAL AREAS 

Subpart C—Idaho Roadless Area 

Management 

■ 1. The authority citation for subpart C 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 472, 529, 551, 1608, 

1613; 23 U.S.C. 201, 205. 

■ 2. Amend the table in § 294.29 by 

revising the entries for Big Creek Fringe 

and Placer Creek in Payette National 

Forest to read as follows: 

§ 294.29 [Amended] 

* * * * * 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 60 / Tuesday, March 29, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 17343 

Forest Idaho roadless area Number WLR Primitive BCR GFRG SAHTS FPSA 

*******

Payette ................ Big Creek Fringe ..... 009 .................... .................... X .................... .................... ....................

* * * * * * * 

Payette ................ Placer Creek ........... 008 .................... X X .................... .................... ....................

* * * * * * * 

Dated: March 22, 2011. 

Thomas L. Tidwell, 

Chief, U.S. Forest Service. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7247 Filed 3–28–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–11–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2011–0169; FRL–9286–8] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Nevada; 

Determination of Attainment for the 

Clark County 8-Hour Ozone 

Nonattainment Area 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is determining that the 

Clark County (Nevada) 8-hour ozone 

nonattainment area has attained the 

1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air 

quality standards (NAAQS). This 

determination is based upon complete, 

quality-assured, and certified ambient 

air monitoring data that show the area 

has monitored attainment of the 1997 8- 

hour ozone NAAQS for the 2007 to 2009 

monitoring period. Preliminary air 

quality monitoring data available for 

2010 are consistent with continued 

attainment. Based on this 

determination, the obligation for the 

State of Nevada to submit an attainment 

demonstration and associated 

reasonably available control measures 

(RACM), a reasonable further progress 

(RFP) plan, contingency measures, and 

other planning requirements related to 

attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS for the Clark County ozone 

nonattainment area shall be suspended 

for as long as the nonattainment area 

continues to meet the 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS. This action is being 

taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). 

DATES: This action is effective on May 

31, 2011 without further notice, unless 

EPA receives adverse comment by April 

28, 2011. If EPA receives adverse 

comment, we will publish a timely 

withdrawal in the Federal Register 

informing the public that the rule will 

not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09– 

OAR–2011–0169 by one of the following 

methods: 

1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. E-mail: kelly.johnj@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (415) 947–3579. 

4. Mail: ‘‘EPA–R09–OAR–2011–0169,’’ 

Lisa Hanf, Chief, Air Planning Office, 

Air Division, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne Street (Air–2), San 

Francisco, California 94105. 

5. Hand Delivery or Courier: At the 

previously-listed EPA Region IX 

address. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Docket’s normal 

hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R09–OAR–2011– 

0169. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or by e-mail 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected. The http:// 

www.regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through http:// 

www.regulations.gov, your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional information 

about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA 

Docket Center homepage at http:// 

www.epa.gov/dockets/. 

Docket: All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the 

http://www.regulations.gov index. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, for 

example, CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically in http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Air Planning Office, Air Division, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street (Air–2), 

San Francisco, California 94105. EPA 

requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection during normal 

business hours. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Kelly, (415) 947–4151, or by e-mail at 

kelly.johnj@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. What determination is EPA making? 

II. What is the background for this action? 

A. The Clark County Ozone Nonattainment 

Area 

B. Determination of Attainment 

C. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Data 

III. What is the effect of this action? 

A. Determination of Attainment 

B. Subpart 1 Designation 

IV. What is EPA’s analysis of the relevant air 

quality data? 

V. EPA’s Final Action 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1