SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST (in accordance with 40 CFRPart 51

- App. V) SIP Submitted by : Pennsylvania Department ofEnvironmental Protection Date Submitted: July 15, 2014 Subject: 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide (N02)National Ambient Air Quality Standards Infrastructure SIP Completeness Review**~** "'**~.P'** Completedby: Ruth ci pp Date Completed: August 6, 2014 Administrative Materials ACCEPTABLE 

### II EPA REQUIREMENT 

### I STATE SUBMITTAL 

### I (X) 

### I 1. A formal letter ofsubmittal from the Governor orhis 1. Transmittal letter dated July 15, 2014 from Secretary ofthe 

### p designee, requesting EPA approval ofthe plan or revision Environment E. Christopher Abruzzo to Shawn Garvin ofEPA. thereof. 2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code 2. Applicable portions of 110(a)(2) are found inthe PA SIP-at p- orbody ofregulations; or issued the permit, order, consent 40 CFRPart 52 or in**t~e** state code/body ofregulations. agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date ofadoption or final issuance as well as the effective date ofthe plan, ifdifferent from the adoption/issuance date. 3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority 3. Pennsylvania Air Pollution Control Act provides authority 

### P' under State lawto adopt and implement the plan. to implement the plan.

4. A copy ofactual regulation, or document submitted for 4. The infrastructure submittal which references other approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including submittals already in the SIP along with portions ofthe state 

### P" indication ofthe changes made to the existing approved plan, code/body ofregulations is dated July 15, 2014. where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy ofthe official State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated bythe appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date ofthe regulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself.- - EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X) 5. Evidence that the State followed all ofthe procedural 5. Yes the transmittal letter and other documentation indicate requirements ofthe State's laws and constitution in conducting that Pennsylvania followed the procedural requirements for 

### P' and completing the adoption/issuance ofthe plan. adoption ofthe plan. 6. Evidence that public notice was given ofthe proposed 6. Public noticed date May 3, 2014 indicated a public comment 

### P' change consistent with procedures approved byEPA, including period was held from May 3, 2014 through June 6, 2014. he date ofpublication ofsuch notice. 7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance 7. The public notice indicated that ifrequested, a public 

### P' with the information provided inthe public notice and the hearing would be held onJune 4, 2014. State's laws and constitution, ifapplicable. 8. Compilation ofpublic comments and the State's response 8. PADEP provided a copy ofthe comments provided during 

### P' thereto. the state comment period and their responses.

--- Technical S EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X) 1. Identification ofall regulated pollutants affected bythe plan. 1. Nitrogen Dioxide is the pollutant. 

### P" 

### I 2. Identification ofthe locations ofaffected sources including 2. The plan effects sources statewide. There are no N02 

### P' !the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation ofthe locations nonattainment areas for this NAAQS in PA. and the status ofthe attainment plan for the affected area(s). 3. Quantification ofthe changes inplan allowable emissions 3. No changes occur to emissions as a results ofthis from the affected sources; estimates ofchanges in current submission. actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, P' quantification ofchanges in actual emissions from affected • sources through calculations ofthe differences between certain !baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result ofthe revision. 4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air 4. Since the plan does not modify emissions, it will not effect 

### P' quality standards, prevention ofsignificant deterioration these items. increments, reasonable_further progress demonstration, andEPA REQIDREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X) visibility, as applicable, are protected ifthe plan is approved and implemented. 5. Modeling information required to support the proposed 5. No modeling information is required, butthe authority to do evision, including input data, output data, models used, modeling is discussed in this plan under element K. ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, 

### p**~ustification** for use ofoffsite data (where used),.modes of**~odels** used, assumptions, and other information relevant to he determination ofadequacy ofthe modeling analysis. 

### 6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are . 6. This information is found in the Pennsylvania SIP under the 

### p- based on continuous emissionreduction technology. applicable portions of40 CFRPart 52.

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work 7. This information is found in the Pennsylvania SIP under the 

### p- tpractice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, applicable portions of40 CFRPart 52 rwhere necessary, to ensure emission levels. 8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how 8. This information is found in the Pennsylvania SIP under the 

### p- compliance will be determined in practice. applicable portions of40 CFRPart 52

9. Special economic and technologicaljustificationsrequired 9.NA by any applicable EPApolicies. (Ifa policy is not appropriate, 

### pexplain why.) 10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a 10. NA maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant 

### p NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation.