alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Teleconnect Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company each hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





March 17,
2010





By:
                  /s/ Dirk L. BenschopDirk
      L. Benschop, Director,Chief
      Executive Officer,President,
      and Treasurer
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Solely
for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of
BlastGard International, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of
the company on Form 10-Q /A for the period ended March 31, 2010, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the company’s financial condition and
results of operations.







May 18 , 2010/s/ Michael J.
      GordonMichael
      J. Gordon, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer
NUMBERS 13-22-00466-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

 

RENE GUILLERMO GARCIA 

A/K/A RENE GACIA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 399th District Court

of Bexar County, Texas.

ORDER TO FORWARD COPY OF EXHIBIT

Before Chief Contreras and Justices Longoria and Silva

Order Per Curiam

This matter is before the Court on State’s motion for exhibits. Rene Guillermo Garcia 

appealed a judgment in trial cause number 2020CR6905. The trial court admitted exhibits, 

which included State’s video disc exhibit 51. This exhibit is believed to contain a video in 

three parts. The Court is of the opinion that the State is entitled to view this exhibit.
2

Accordingly, State’s motion for State’s exhibit number 51 is granted, and the clerk of the trial

court and the court reporter together are hereby ordered to forward a copy of State’s exhibit 

51 to appellant’s counsel, the State, and the Clerk of the Court within ten days from the 

date of this order. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the

25th day of January, 2023.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Hilton Hotels Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's
knowledge, that the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|Date: March 10, 2004 |                                                             |  | 
|-------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                     | /s/STEPHEN F. BOLLENBACH                                    |  | 
|                     | Stephen F. Bollenbach President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |                                                             |  | 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---

QuickLinks
### §553a. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 655

Section, acts June 29, 1949, ch. 280, title I, 63 Stat. 337; Oct. 15, 1949, ch. 695, §6(a), 63 Stat. 881, prescribed salary of Chief Forester. See section 5316 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
## PRD Label Data Report: Food/Feed & Non-Food/Non-Feed Uses Considered in Registration Review **Work Planning** Chemical (109709) Metofluthrin Current As Of Date : 12/30/2011 

## Note: This is an aggregate report of registered uses for this chemical. Label data for chemicals with more than one pesticide product are presented in aggregate form (i.e. each line of data may be a combination of data from one or more pesticide).**F o** **o d** **( F** **) /** **N o** **n -** **f o** **o d** **( N** **)**



### Use Site **Formulation Desc A. I. Max App**  **Rate/App Max # Apps /** 

**CC A. I. Max** 

**App Rate/CC**  **Max # Apps /**

**Year A. I. Max App** 

**Rate/Year Minimum** 

**Retreatment Interval**  **Minimum**

**Reentry Interval**  **PGI / PHI / PSI Allow Geo Restrictions**  **DisAllow Geo Restrictions** 

N HOUSEHOLD/DOMESTIC DW ELLINGS OUTDOOR PREMISES IMPREGNATED MATERIAL NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS No Restrictions No Restrictions N HUMAN BODY/CLOTHING W HILE BEING W ORN IMPREGNATED MATERIAL NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS No Restrictions No Restrictions N PATHS/PATIOS IMPREGNATED MATERIAL NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS No Restrictions No Restrictions N RECREATIONAL AREAS IMPREGNATED MATERIAL NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS No Restrictions No Restrictions CAA || CAS || CAT || CDA CAA || CAS || CAT || CDA



### Limitations **NDC - No Dosage Conversion ; NS - Not Specified**



### Limitation Code **Limitation Description** C (AA) Do not apply to any body of water. CAS || CAT || CDA CAS || CAT || CDA



### C (AS) Do not contaminate food or feed. C (AT) Do not place in locations accessible to children, pets or domestic animals. C (DA) Do not use indoors.

Each row of this report is determined by the unique combination of the food/nonfood indicator, use site, formulation, and maximum application rate per application (key columns). The remaining, non-key columns of the report display either worse case or aggregate data from the label information that defines the unique data row. Note that each non-key column does not necessarily relate to any other non-key column with in the same row.



### Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 8 

Ref: 8P-AR 

Martha Rudolph 

Colorado Department of Public Health 

and Environment 

4300 Cherry Creek Drive South 

Denver, CO 80246-1530 

Dear Ms. Rudolph: 

1595 Wynkoop Street 

DENVER, CO 80202-1129 

Phone 800-227-8917 

http://www.epa.gov/region08 

AUG O'l 2013 

This letter responds to Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment's (CDPHE) July I , 

2013, submittal for approval of a regional high wind event in southern Colorado. CDPHE determined 

that this regional high wind event caused emission exceedances ofthe PM10NAAQS at the monitor in 

the Pagosa Springs PM 10 maintenance area and at two Alamosa monitors on May 11 , 2010. 

EPA has reviewed the documentation provided by CDPHE to demonstrate that these exceedances on 

May 11, 2010, meet the criteria for an exceptional event under the Exceptional Events Rule (EER), 40 

CFR 50.14. EPA concurs based on the weight of evidence that CDPHE has successfully made the 

demonstrations necessary to comply within 40 CFR 50.14. In addition, CDPHE has met the schedule 

and procedural requirements in section 50.14( c) with respect to the demonstration. A more detailed 

assessment ofCDPHE's demonstration is enclosed. My staff has, or shortly will, enter "concurrence 

flags." for these data into EPA's Air Quality System (AQS). 

Based on these determinations, EPA will exclude these data from the following types of calculations and 

activities: 

• EPA's AQS will not count these days as exceedances when generating user reports, or 

include them in design values estimates, unless the AQS user specifically indicates that 

they should be included. 

• EPA will accept the exclusion of these data for the purposes of selecting appropriate 

background concentrations for New Source Review air quality analyses. 1 

• EPA will accept the exclusion of these data for the pw·poses of selecting appropriate 

background concentrations for transportation conformity hot spot analyses. 2 

1

1f EPA is the permitting authority, EPA will propose penn its on this basis. If EPA is commenting on another permitting 

authority's proposed action, EPA's comments will be consistent with the determ in at ions in this letter. 

2 Applicable only to PM10 and PM2.s · 
The determinations conveyed in this letter do not constitute final EPA action regarding any matter on 

which EPA is required to provide an opportunity for public comment. In particular, this applies to 

determinations regarding the attainment status or classification of the area. Final actions will take place 

only after EPA completes notice and comment rulemaking on those determinations. As an additional 

clarification, the determinations conveyed in this letter are applicable only to determinations 

incorporating the submitted data relative to the PM10 NAAQS. 

If you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter further, please contact Carl Daly at 

(303) 312-6416. 

Regional Administrator 

Enclosure 

cc: William Allison, CDPHE Air Pollution Control Division 

2 

G) Printed on Recycled Paper
### §555. Forest headquarters, ranger stations, dwellings, or other needed sites

Where no suitable Government land is available for national forest headquarters, ranger stations, dwellings, or for other sites required for the effective conduct of the authorized activities of the Forest Service, the Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to purchase such lands out of the appropriation applicable to the purpose for which the land is to be used, and to accept donations of land for any national forest or experimental purpose: Provided, That such lands may be acquired subject to such reservations and outstanding interests as the Secretary determines will not interfere with the purpose for which acquired: Provided further, That not to exceed $50,000 may be expended in any one fiscal year pursuant to this authority.

(Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 457, §5, 43 Stat. 1133; Apr. 24, 1950, ch. 97, §13, 64 Stat. 86; Pub. L. 85–464, §9, June 20, 1958, 72 Stat. 218.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1958—Pub. L. 85–464 substituted "$50,000" for "$25,000".

1950—Act Apr. 24, 1950, applied section to dwellings or other needed sites and inserted provisos.
Case 17-03037-KLP Doc 1 Filed 02/14/17 Entered 02/14/17 11:20:16 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 19
Case 17-03037-KLP Doc 1 Filed 02/14/17 Entered 02/14/17 11:20:16 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 19
Case 17-03037-KLP Doc 1 Filed 02/14/17 Entered 02/14/17 11:20:16 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 19
Case 17-03037-KLP Doc 1 Filed 02/14/17 Entered 02/14/17 11:20:16 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 19
Case 17-03037-KLP Doc 1 Filed 02/14/17 Entered 02/14/17 11:20:16 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 19
Case 17-03037-KLP Doc 1 Filed 02/14/17 Entered 02/14/17 11:20:16 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 19
Case 17-03037-KLP Doc 1 Filed 02/14/17 Entered 02/14/17 11:20:16 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 19
Case 17-03037-KLP Doc 1 Filed 02/14/17 Entered 02/14/17 11:20:16 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 19
Case 17-03037-KLP Doc 1 Filed 02/14/17 Entered 02/14/17 11:20:16 Desc Main

Document Page 9 of 19
Case 17-03037-KLP Doc 1 Filed 02/14/17 Entered 02/14/17 11:20:16 Desc Main

Document Page 10 of 19
Case 17-03037-KLP Doc 1 Filed 02/14/17 Entered 02/14/17 11:20:16 Desc Main

Document Page 11 of 19
Case 17-03037-KLP Doc 1 Filed 02/14/17 Entered 02/14/17 11:20:16 Desc Main

Document Page 12 of 19
Case 17-03037-KLP Doc 1 Filed 02/14/17 Entered 02/14/17 11:20:16 Desc Main

Document Page 13 of 19
Case 17-03037-KLP Doc 1 Filed 02/14/17 Entered 02/14/17 11:20:16 Desc Main

Document Page 14 of 19
Case 17-03037-KLP Doc 1 Filed 02/14/17 Entered 02/14/17 11:20:16 Desc Main

Document Page 15 of 19
Case 17-03037-KLP Doc 1 Filed 02/14/17 Entered 02/14/17 11:20:16 Desc Main

Document Page 16 of 19
Case 17-03037-KLP Doc 1 Filed 02/14/17 Entered 02/14/17 11:20:16 Desc Main

Document Page 17 of 19
Case 17-03037-KLP Doc 1 Filed 02/14/17 Entered 02/14/17 11:20:16 Desc Main

Document Page 18 of 19
Case 17-03037-KLP Doc 1 Filed 02/14/17 Entered 02/14/17 11:20:16 Desc Main

Document Page 19 of 19
### Geology of the Lees Ferry area, Coconino County, Arizona

By: David A. Phoenix

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1137

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate- 1**                            (14312 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 1**                            (14914 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 68.36 *Ex parte* communications. ( a ) *General.* Except for other employees of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, the Administrative Law Judge shall not consult any person, or party, on any fact in issue unless upon notice and opportunity for all parties to participate. Communications by the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer, the assigned judge, or any party for the sole purpose of scheduling hearings, or requesting extensions of time are not considered *ex parte* communications, except that all other parties shall be notified of such request by the requesting party and be given an opportunity to respond thereto.
( b ) *Sanctions.* A party or participant who makes a prohibited *ex parte* communication, or who encourages or solicits another to make any such communication, may be subject to any appropriate sanction or sanctions, including but not limited to, exclusion from the proceedings and adverse ruling on the issue which is the subject of the prohibited communication.
[54 FR 48596, Nov. 24, 1989. Redesignated by Order No. 1534-91, 56 FR 50053, Oct. 3, 1991]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Prince LINTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-7706.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 26, 2002.

Decided May 14, 2002.

Prince Linton, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. McWilliams, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Prince Linton appeals an order of the district court denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s order of August 17, 2001, which denied his request for an inquiry into the procedure used to test drug evidence in his case and for independent retesting of the drug evidence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *United States v. Linton,*No. CR-97-22 (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 223/2005

of 10 February 2005         

concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (1), and in particular Article 9(1)(a) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The goods described in column 1 of the table set out in the Annex shall be classified within the Combined Nomenclature under the CN code indicated in column 2.

Article 2

Binding tariff information issued by the customs authorities of Member States, which is not in accordance with this Regulation, can continue to be invoked for a period of three months under Article 12(6) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 February 2005.

For the Commission

László KOVÁCS            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1989/2004 (OJ L 344, 20.11.2004, p. 5).

(2)OJ L 302, 19.10.1992, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by the Act of Accession of 2003.

----

ANNEX

----
# Official Journal L 18/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 18 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5926 January 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 18

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5926 January 2016

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2016/70 of Amending budget No 8 of the European Union for the financial year 2015 | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

Definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2016/70 of Amending budget No 8 of the European Union for the financial year 2015

1

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

Any revenue provided for in Article 21(2) and (3) of the Financial Regulation, entered in Titles 5 and 6 of the statement of revenue, may lead to additional appropriations being entered on the headings which bore the initial expenditure giving rise to the corresponding revenue.

Figures for outturn refer to all authorised appropriations, including budget appropriations, additional appropriations and earmarked revenue.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Order entered January 2 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00921
- CR
JOSHUA PAUL WASHBURN , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F
- 1161795
- Y



### O RDER
The Court GRANTS the State’s December 27, 2013 second motion for extension of time
to file the State’s brief

. We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file the brief tendered as of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUS TICE
Exhibit 32

                                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of A Better  Way  Financial
Corp.,  on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 91.6 Matching requirement. ( a ) The federal share of a grant received under this subtitle may not exceed 75 percent of the costs of a proposal described in an application approved under this subtitle. The matching requirement can only be met through a hard cash match, and must be satisfied by the end of the project period. A certification to that effect will be required of each recipient of grant funds and must be submitted to the Office of Justice Programs with the application.
( b ) [Reserved]