alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Mary E. D. Burke. Anton H. Meyer v. David H. Schulte.

Motions for preference granted. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
### §58. Laws applicable; fugitives from justice

All the laws applicable to places under sole and exclusive jurisdiction of the United States shall have force and effect in said parks or either of them. All fugitives from justice taking refuge in said parks, or either of them, shall be subject to the same laws as refugees from justice found in the State of California.

(June 2, 1920, ch. 218, §1, 41 Stat. 731.)
Exhibit 2

Case 17-03187-KRH Doc 1-2 Filed 04/14/17 Entered 04/14/17 18:26:54 Desc 

 Exhibit 2 Page 1 of 3
3D\PHQW1XPEHU 3D\PHQW$PRXQW 3D\PHQW'DWH

3D\PHQW/LVWLQJIRU&DUROLQD,QWHUQDO0HGLFLQH

+HDOWK'LDJQRVWLF/DERUDWRU\,QF

  

  

   

   

  

  

   

   

   

  

   

   

   

  

  

   

   

  

  

   

   

  

  

   

   

   

  

   

   

   

  

  

Case 17-03187-KRH Doc 1-2 Filed 04/14/17 Entered 04/14/17 18:26:54 Desc 

 Exhibit 2 Page 2 of 3
3D\PHQW1XPEHU 3D\PHQW$PRXQW 3D\PHQW'DWH

3D\PHQW/LVWLQJIRU&DUROLQD,QWHUQDO0HGLFLQH

+HDOWK'LDJQRVWLF/DERUDWRU\,QF

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  



Case 17-03187-KRH Doc 1-2 Filed 04/14/17 Entered 04/14/17 18:26:54 Desc 

 Exhibit 2 Page 3 of 3
### Columbia River Basalt in the Riggins quadrangle, western Idaho

By: Warren Bell Hamilton

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1141L

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (5026 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (4325 pdf)                        
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
EXHIBIT 32

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

     In connection with the quarterly report of FreeStar Technology  Corporation
("Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the  quarter  ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission  ("Report"),  the  undersigned,  in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below,  hereby certify pursuant to Section
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  Section  1350) that to their
knowledge:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 13, 2005                                     By: /s/  Paul Egan
                                                            --------------------
                                                        Paul Egan
                                                        Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 13, 2005                                     By: /s/  Ciaran Egan
                                                            --------------------
                                                        Ciaran Egan
                                                        Secretary/Treasurer/
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
#### § 65.2 State Government.

In the event that a law enforcement emergency exists throughout a state or part of a state, a state (on behalf of itself or a local unit of government) may submit an application to the Attorney General, for emergency Federal law enforcement assistance. This application is to be submitted by the chief executive officer of the state, in writing, on Standard Form 424, and in accordance with these regulations.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7251

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KELVIN O’NEIL KENNEDY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, District Judge. (CR-94-297, CA-98-850-4-12) Submitted: January 18, 2001 Decided: January 25, 2001 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kelvin O’Neil Kennedy, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Kennedy alleges for the first time on appeal that his sentence was illegal under Apprendi v. New Jersey , 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000). Even if this claim was properly before the court, Kennedy was not sentenced above the statutory maximum for the offense ofconviction. As a result, the sentence does not implicate the concerns raised in Apprendi . United States v. Angle , 230 F.3d 113 (4th Cir. 2000), petition for rehearing filed , Oct. 26, 2000 (No. 96-4662). 2 PER CURIAM: Kelvin O’Neil Kennedy seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. * We note, however, that the court deemed the motion untimely filed under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act. We find that it was timely filed on March 27, 1998. However, the district reviewed the claims raisedon their merits, thus the motion was properly reviewed. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Kennedy, Nos. CR-94-297; CA-98-850-4-12 (D.S.C. July 31, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §5959. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 105–391, title IV, §410, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3514, related to contracting for services. See section 101920 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333- 47153) of HMI Industries Inc. of our report
dated February 13, 2004 (except for Note 2, Note 5 and Note 12, as to which the
date is October 20, 2004), relating to the consolidated financial statements,
which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated February 13, 2004 (except for
Note 2, Note 5 and Note 12, as to which the date is October 20, 2004) relating
to the Financial Statement Schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
October 22, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>


 <ARTICLE>                     5
 <LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2000,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
 </LEGEND>
 <CIK>                         0001102065
 <NAME>                        3045 Corporation

 <S>                                            <C>
 <PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
 <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-30-2000
 <PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-1-1999
 <PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-2000
 <CASH>                                         128
 <SECURITIES>                                   0
 <RECEIVABLES>                                  0
 <ALLOWANCES>                                   0
 <INVENTORY>                                    0
 <CURRENT-ASSETS>                               128
 <PP&E>                                         0
 <DEPRECIATION>                                 0
 <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128
 <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          21,467
 <BONDS>                                        0
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
 <PREFERRED>                                    0
 <COMMON>                                       5,350
 <OTHER-SE>                                    (26,689)
 <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   128
 <SALES>                                        0
 <TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
 <CGS>                                          0
 <TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
 <OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (6,003)
 <LOSS-PROVISION>                              (6,003)
 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
 <INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
 <INCOME-TAX>                                   0
 <INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (6,003)
 <DISCONTINUED>                                 0
 <EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
 <CHANGES>                                      0
 <NET-INCOME>                                  (6,003)
 <EPS-BASIC>                                   (.006)
 <EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.006)



</TABLE>
#### § 810.300 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to implement 23 U.S.C. 142(a)(2), which allows the Urban Mass Transportation Administrator, by delegation of the Secretary, to approve nonhighway public mass transit projects as Federal-aid urban system projects.
### §698g. Acquisition of lands for Big Cypress Preserve

#### (a) Expeditious acquisition of Florida lands

In recognition of the efforts of the State of Florida in the preservation of the area, through the enactment of chapter 73–131 of the Florida statutes, "The Big Cypress Conservation Act of 1973", the Secretary is directed to proceed as expeditiously as possible to acquire the lands and interests in lands necessary to achieve the purposes of sections 698f to 698m–4 of this title.

#### (b) Submission of plan to Congressional committees; time; contents

Within one year after October 11, 1974, the Secretary shall submit, in writing, to the Committee 1 on Interior and Insular Affairs and to the Committees on Appropriations of the United States Congress a detailed plan which shall indicate:

(i) the lands and areas which he deems essential to the protection and public enjoyment of this preserve.

(ii) the lands which he has previously acquired by purchase, donation, exchange or transfer for administration for the purpose of this preserve, and

(iii) the annual acquisition program (including the level of funding) which he recommends for the ensuing five fiscal years.

#### (c) Time for completion of land acquisition program

It is the express intent of the Congress that the Secretary should substantially complete the land acquisition program contemplated by sections 698f to 698m–4 of this title within six years after October 11, 1974.

(Pub. L. 93–440, §2, Oct. 11, 1974, 88 Stat. 1259.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the Senate abolished and replaced by Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate, effective Feb. 11, 1977. See Rule XXV of Standing Rules of the Senate, as amended by Senate Resolution No. 4 (popularly cited as the "Committee System Reorganization Amendments of 1977"), approved Feb. 4, 1977.

Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the House of Representatives changed to Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives on Jan. 5, 1993, by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Third Congress.

1 So in original. Probably should be "Committees".
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TOWER IMAGING, LLC a/a/o ANTHONY MACALUSO,

Appellant,

v.

USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1110

[July 14, 2021]

Appeal of nonfinal order from the County Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ellen Feld, Judge; L.T. Case No. COWE20-003812.

John C. Daly, Jr., and Matthew C. Barber of Daly & Barber, P.A. 

formerly known as PIP Portal Law Group, P.A., Plantation, for appellant.

Jeffrey R. Geldens of Roig Lawyers, Miami, and Abbi Freifeld Carr and 

Veresa Jones Adams of Roig Lawyers, Deerfield Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court sua sponte entered an order transferring venue without 

any showing that plaintiff’s chosen venue was improper or that transfer 

was appropriate on forum non conveniens grounds. We issued an order 

directing the parties to show cause why these cases are not controlled by 

Advanced Diagnostic Group v. Ocean Harbor Cas. Ins. Co., Case No. 4D21-

458, 2021 WL 1310851 (Fla. 4th DCA Apr. 8, 2021), where this Court 

recently reversed a group of similar orders. Having considered the 

response and reply, we conclude that these cases are controlled by our 

recent decision in Advanced Diagnostics and Jones v. Sayer, 313 So. 3d 

126 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021) (holding that a court may not sua sponte transfer 

an action for improper venue). 

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

CONNER, C.J., KLINGENSMITH and ARTAU, JJ., concur.
2

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of LegalPlay Entertainment Inc. on form
10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Cecil Morris,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



November 21, 2005
----------------------------------            ----------------------------------
(Date)                                        Cecil Morris
                                              Director, President / Secretary
#### Fae F. Cunningham, Respondent, v. Henry P. Cunningham, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
#### § 39.151 Program accessibility: New construction and alterations.

Each building or part of a building that is constructed or altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of the agency shall be designed, constructed, or altered so as to be readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons. The definitions, requirements, and standards of the Architectural Barriers Act (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), as established in 41 CFR 101-19.600 to 101-19.607, apply to buildings covered by this section.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**
I, William H. Wilcox, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United SurgicalPartners International, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theRegistrant and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the Registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the Registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
 5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theRegistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        /s/ William H. Wilcox  William H. Wilcox  Chief Executive Officer   
November 4, 2004
§ 115.176 Disciplinary sanctions for staff. ( a ) Staff shall be subject to disciplinary sanctions up to and including termination for violating agency sexual abuse or sexual harassment policies.
( b ) Termination shall be the presumptive disciplinary sanction for staff who have engaged in sexual abuse.
( c ) Disciplinary sanctions for violations of agency policies relating to sexual abuse or sexual harassment (other than actually engaging in sexual abuse) shall be commensurate with the nature and circumstances of the acts committed, the staff member's disciplinary history, and the sanctions imposed for comparable offenses by other staff with similar histories.
( d ) All terminations for violations of agency sexual abuse or sexual harassment policies, or resignations by staff who would have been terminated if not for their resignation, shall be reported to law enforcement agencies, unless the activity was clearly not criminal, and to any relevant licensing bodies.
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 10.29



                                January 3, 2000



BioLynx.Com, Inc.                   Via Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested
5617 Grissom Road
San Antonio, Texas 78238
Attn: Mr. Charles Pircher

     Re: Exercise of Conversion Rights on Subordinated Debenture

Dear Sirs:

     At this time, I wish to inform you of my decision to convert the entire
remaining principal balance of the subordinated debenture into shares of the
Company's common stock pursuant to paragraph 3.1. Enclosed, please find the
originally executed copy of the debenture. At your earliest convenience, please
issue stock certificates in my name for, by my calculation, 335,613 shares of
common stock. Please call me to discuss the number of stock certificates to be
issued. If you agree with my calculation of the number of shares to be issued,
please execute this document and return a copy to me by facsimile.

     If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.


                                            Sincerely,

                                            /s/ John D. Walker II

                                            John D. Walker II

Enclosure

cc:  Mr. Patrick E. Tolle           Via Regular Mail


BioLynx.Com, Inc.


/s/ Charles Pircher
______________________________________
Charles Pircher
(No. 77-CC-2245

#### James F. Vaughn, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed December 19, 1977.*

*268Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas v. State, 32*Ill.Ct.Cl.__, this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
§ 83.215 What must I include in my drug-free awareness program? You must establish an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform employees about— ( a ) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
( b ) Your policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
( c ) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and
( d ) The penalties that you may impose upon them for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace.
#### § 71.43 Collection of civil penalties and assessments.

Sections 3806 and 3808(b) of title 31, United States Code, authorize actions for collection of civil penalties and assessments imposed under this part and specify the procedures for such actions.