alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §742g. Cooperation with State Department

#### (a) Representation at international meetings

The Secretary shall cooperate to the fullest practicable extent with the Secretary of State in providing representation at all meetings and conferences relating to fish and wildlife in which representatives of the United States and foreign countries participate.

The Secretary of State shall designate the Secretary of the Interior or the Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife, or a person designated by the Secretary of the Interior to represent the Department of the Interior, as a member of the United States delegation attending such meetings and conferences and also as a member of the negotiating team of any such delegation.

#### (b) Consultation with officials responsible for technical and economic aid

The Secretary of State and all other officials having responsibilities in the fields of technical and economic aid to foreign nations shall consult with the Secretary in all cases in which the interests of fish and wildlife are involved, with a view to assuring that such interests are adequately represented at all times.

#### (c) International negotiations

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary shall be represented in all international negotiations conducted by the United States pursuant to section 1351 of title 19, in any case in which fish products are directly affected by such negotiations.

#### (d) Consultation with governmental, private nonprofit, and other organizations

The Secretary shall consult periodically with the various governmental, private nonprofit, and other organizations and agencies which have to do with any phase of fish and wildlife with respect to any problems that may arise in connection with such fish and wildlife.

(Aug. 8, 1956, ch. 1036, §8, 70 Stat. 1123.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Transfer of functions to Secretary of Commerce from Secretary of the Interior by Reorg. Plan No. 4 of 1970, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090, see note set out under section 742b of this title.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Robert Tarini, Chief Executive Officer of Markland Technologies, Inc.,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Markland
Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 2005                    /S/ ROBERT TARINI
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           ROBERT TARINI
                                           CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
#### Anna Lenahan, an Infant, by John Lenahan, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, *v.*The City of New York, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 18th day of October, 1913, on a verdict and also from an order entered on the 31st day of October, 1913, denying a motion for a new trial.

Per Curiam:

Plaintiff proved no negligence on defendant’s part *(Lalor*v. *City of New*York, 308 N. Y. 431), and the finding that defendant was negligent was without evidence to support it, and that finding is, therefore, reversed. The judgment is, therefore, reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Order to be settled on notice.
(No. 78-CC-1292

#### John E. Butcher, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed September 11, 1978.*

*789Per Curiam.

Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that his property was lost, misplaced, stolen or destroyed while he was imprisoned, and that the loss of his property was proximately caused by the negligence of employees of the State of Illinois.

In *Bargas v. State, 32*Ill.Ct.Cl.__, this Court held that the State of Illinois does not owe a duty to inmates of its penal institutions to safeguard property which inmates keep in their cells. In the companion case of *Doubling v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.1,*we further held that only where the State takes actual physical possession of the property of an inmate, as during the course of his transfer between penal institutions, does a duty arise to use reasonable care in protecting the inmate’s property.

The complaint in this action does not allege that Claimant’s property was delivered to agents of the State, but rather that the property disappeared or was damaged in Claimant’s cell. Under our reasoning in *Bargas v. State, supra,*and *Doubling v. State, supra,*the complaint herein fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30608

ROBERT McNEAL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BAR S FOOD CO.; ET AL.,

Defendants,

AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE CO.; BAR S FOODS CO., erroneously named as Bar S Food Company,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Louisiana, Monroe

(95-CV-656)

March 11, 1997

Before GARWOOD, WIENER and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. *

PER CURIAM:

After considering the briefs and argument of counsel, and the

record, this Court concludes that summary judgmen t was properly

entered in favor of def endant Bar S Foods Company. The summary

judgment record taken as a whole does not suffice to reasonably2

support an affirmative factual fi nding

— — as opposed to a mere

suspicion, speculation, or conjecture

—— either that the bologna was

a ctually toxic or that what plaintiff suffered from was actually

food poisoning.

AFFIRMED
!"##$%&

$'()*	+,((+&



		
-.-	

/0	.0-
0	

)+ 0)((11

2 	+2034 5!5"#

		6/
7-	


-.

7-	
-8


		/	

8'0/3

8



-

6	%8


	
8
	
8					

	
		'	8+	

)+ 1+




(+*1.9*""5439)1()-(.(93,*1

0(9:0$;()-(<;)+ 0)((11<&>(()-(2(:

++146?.)>@55!?+9,"" 445 4555

A9+$;A9<&)11()-(+(BC?C#!C$;03+&

)3,((:1B5,())(,D(,9,:::)(,(1)(()(*1()-(

0(2+:0)90)(3*5" ?E5 E! #"$;0)(3*<&113(21,'9)*4"5"9:

	9:9"5!:(*1-(+@93*999"?-

Case 17-03029-KRH Doc 9 Filed 02/22/17 Entered 02/22/17 14:46:28 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 3
F"5E2(:3(++A9+:+392(:>18


	

 )@))33*,1,()-(03+(,9

1BC?C#!C(1,133@1+((:(*1-(+

@93*9099
3)@93*9)45C4 $&93+()),+(

33+3>(3+9+:9(+)(9*	+,(((211(31-(+

9

" -3(2(:+(3(1,)@()-())+(9,1

BC?C#!C+(3+*)@

! 03+)),(+((:(*1-(+

@93*99())9(1,)(1)++G93(2)(1H3@

I1()+(2 3(++2*3+(:+19+1(9

+JJJJJJJJJJ"54 JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ

%2(9@

-(+@93*'9+:

Feb 22 2017 /s/ Kevin R. Huennekens

Entered on Docket: Feb 22 2017

Case 17-03029-KRH Doc 9 Filed 02/22/17 Entered 02/22/17 14:46:28 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 3
	%.

KK'2:

'2:$L	M45#44&

33(

	9
9@

	)+N0%*3)

0

C5/39	26

6(:"555 !4E!

)"5" #E" 555

2:O@3,

	

	


	


	


	

Case 17-03029-KRH Doc 9 Filed 02/22/17 Entered 02/22/17 14:46:28 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS RULINGS

Release No. 6889/December 8, 2022

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-21241

In the Matter of :

:

JASON JIANXUN TANG, CPA : ORDER

The Securities and Exchange Commission instituted this proceeding against Respondent Jason 

Jianxun Tang, CPA, with an Order Instituting Proceedings (OIP), pursuant to Sections 4C and 21C of 

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 102(e) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. 

§ 201.102(e), on November 17, 2022. Pursuant to Respondent’s Offer of Settlement, the OIP made 

various findings of fact and conclusions of law, imposed remedial sanctions and a cease-and- desist 

order, and ordered a hearing before the undersigned Administrative Law Judge to determine what, if 

any civil penalties are appropriate under Section 21C of the Exchange Act.

In response to the Orders of November 18 and December 2, 2022, the parties have filed a Joint 

Motion for Stay. See Jason Jianxun Tang, CPA, Admin. Proc. Rulings Release Nos. 6880, 6887; 2022 

SEC LEXIS 3163, 3224 (A.L.J.). In support of the stay, the parties state that the Commission “is 

currently conducting a related investigation of a third party.” This general description does not appear 

to provide a basis on which the undersigned is authorized to grant a stay. See 17 C.F.R. §§ 

201.161(c)(2), .210(c)(3). Accordingly, a telephonic prehearing conference will be held on December 

12, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. EST. The Division of Enforcement should arrange for a court reporter and 

circulate dial-in instructions to participants before the conference. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/S/ Carol Fox Foelak 

Carol Fox Foelak

Administrative Law Judge
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GU R DE V S I NG H, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 71577 A ge nc yN o. A 042- 967- 796 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2011 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dM cK E O W N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. G urdev S i ng h, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f I nd i a, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng as un t i m el y hi s app ea lfr om an i mmi g r a t i o n j u d g e ’ s r e mo v a lo r d e r . W e h av e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r8 U . S. C. 

# FI LED JAN 03 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 71577 2 § 1 2 5 2 ( a ) . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o qu e s tio n s o f law , Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 400 F . 3d 7 8 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) , an dw e g r an t th e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T he B I A di s m i s s e d S i ngh’ s appe a la s unt i m e l yw i thoutthe be ne f i tof our de c i s i on i n Ir i

goye n–B ri on es v. H

older , 64 4 F . 3d94 3, 94 8 (9th C i r. 20 11 ), w hi ch h e ldth a t th e 3 0 - d ayf

ilin g d e a d lin e f

o rB I A ap p e a ls is n o t ju r is d ic tio n a l. W e th e r e f o r e r e m an df

o rth e B I A to d e te rm in e w h e th e rto c o n s id e rS in g h ’s ap p e a l in lig h t o n th is in te rv e n in g c a s e law . See IN S v. V en tu ra , 5 3 7 U .S . 1 2 , 1 6 ( 2 0 0 2 ) . PETI TI O N FO R R EVI EW GR AN T E D; RE MAND E D.
### §408b. Administration, protection, and development

The administration, protection, and development of the aforesaid park shall be exercised under the direction of the Secretary of the Interior by the National Park Service, subject to the provisions of the Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535), entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes," 1 as amended: Provided, That the provisions of the Federal Power Act [16 U.S.C. 791a et seq.] shall not apply to this park.

(Mar. 3, 1931, ch. 448, §3, 46 Stat. 1514.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535), entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes,", referred to in text, is act Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, 39 Stat. 535, known as the National Park Service Organic Act, which enacted sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 100101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Sections 1 to 4 of the Act were repealed and restated as section 1865(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and section 100101(a), chapter 1003, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of Title 54 by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of former sections of this title, see Disposition Table preceding section 100101 of Title 54.

The Federal Power Act, referred to in text, was in the original the "Act approved June, 10, 1920, known as the Federal Water Power Act," which was redesignated as the Federal Power Act by section 791a of this title. The Federal Power Act is act June 10, 1920, ch. 285, 41 Stat. 1063, and is classified generally to chapter 12 (§791a et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 791a of this title and Tables.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

1 See References in Text note below.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and (b))



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby individually certifies in his capacity as an officer of U.S.I. Holdings Corporation (the Company) that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company at the end of and for the periods covered by such Report.



|                        |  |  |  |                                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Dated: November 8, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ DAVID L. ESLICK                    
|                        |  |  |  | David L. Eslick Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and (b)) and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by the above signatory to the extent of his
respective knowledge.



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
U.S.I. Holdings Corporation and will be retained by U.S.I. Holdings Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1. Operator-- Jason Herman 

 2000 Victoria Dr

 Stafford Va. 22554

2. Regulation-- Exemption under Section 333

3. Safety Operation—Operator will at all times be flying under 200 ft, never 

fly near other aircraft, keep within visual line of sight, keep away from 

emergency responders, never fly over stadiums, sports events, or groups of 

people, never fly under the influence of drugs or alcohol, never fly within 5 

miles of an airport without first contacting air traffic control and airport 

authorities.

4. Public Interest-- The public hires API Home Inspections to do a pre-

 purchase inspection of the property to evaluate the 

 condition of the home prior to purchasing it, this includes 

 photos of the roof, chimney, gutters, etc. The drone 

 gives a better view of the details.

5. Proposed operation of the drone will always be less than 200 ft in height. It 

will be operated at a residence for less than 30 minutes, and it will only be 

for pictures related to the transaction of the property.

6. 2015 Phantom 3 DGI 

Certificate: Holder Jason Herman

UAS Certificate Number FA34T799F4
#### § 810.8 Coordination.

The Federal Highway Administrator and the Urban Mass Transportation Administrator shall coordinate with each other on any projects involving public mass transit to facilitate project selection, approval and completion.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of BlastGard International, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the company’s financial condition and results of operations.




August 15, 2011
By:
/s/ Michael J. GordonMichael J. Gordon, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
### §667f–3. Authorization of appropriations for mitigating losses caused by waterfowl depredation

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to reimburse the Commodity Credit Corporation for its investment in the grain transferred pursuant to sections 667f to 667f–3 of this title.

(July 3, 1956, ch. 512, §4, 70 Stat. 492.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 445 of Title 7, Agriculture, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
Crescent

Chemult

?

W

l k

e

R

i

m

a

r

T. 26 S.

R. 7 E.

Deschutes

 National

 Forest

"58

9"7

5835

9758

9753

9765

9

"7

9755

5840

5850

5825

9756

9760

5825

5828

5852

5830

9751

5834

9402

9407

6125

9768

97
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 97467 / May 10, 2023

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-19499

In the Matter of

Comscore, Inc.,

Respondent.

:

:

: ORDER APPOINTING 

: TAX ADMINISTRATOR

:

:

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

FILE NO. 3-19500

In the Matter of

Serge Matta,

Respondent.

:

:

: 

:

:

:

:

On May 4, 2022, the Commission issued an Omnibus Order Directing the Engagement of 

Two Tax Administrators for Appointment on a Case-By-Case Basis in Administrative 

Proceedings that Establish Distribution Funds (the “Omnibus Order”).1 The Omnibus Order 

engaged Miller Kaplan Arase LLP and Heffler, Radetich & Saitta, LLP to serve as the 

Commission’s tax administrator (“Tax Administrator”), for selection and appointment on an 

individual case basis, for calendar years 2022 through 2024 in administrative proceedings where 

the distribution fund may incur tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) 

under the Department of the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

The Director of the Division of Enforcement is authorized to appoint a Tax Administrator 

pursuant to the Omnibus Order.2 The Commission staff has requested the appointment of Miller 

Kaplan Arase LLP as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding.

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 94845 (May 4, 2022).

2

 See Delegation of Authority to Director of the Division of Enforcement, Securities Act Rel. No. 10900 (Dec. 10, 

2020).
2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the Omnibus Order, Miller Kaplan Arase 

LLP is appointed as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.3

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

3

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(ii).
#### § 973.200 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to implement 23 U.S.C. 204 which requires the Secretary and the Secretary of each appropriate Federal land management agency to the extent appropriate, to develop by rule safety, bridge, pavement, and congestion management systems for roads funded under the FLHP.
Editorial Note on Part 1208
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1208 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10352, Mar. 5, 2003.

§ 1208.8 Limitations on travel outside the United States. ( a ) An applicant who leaves the United States without first obtaining advance parole under § 212.5(f) of this chapter shall be presumed to have abandoned his or her application under this section.
( b ) An applicant who leaves the United States pursuant to advance parole under § 1212.5(f) of this chapter and returns to the country of claimed persecution shall be presumed to have abandoned his or her application, unless the applicant is able to establish compelling reasons for such return.
[62 FR 10337, Mar. 6, 1997, as amended at 65 FR 82255, Dec. 28, 2000]
#### § 158.3 Shortened procedure.

If the audited person subject to a Commission order described in § 158.1 notifies the Commission that it seeks to challenge one or more audit findings, or proposed remedies, or both, in any combination, by the shortened procedure, the Commission shall thereupon issue a notice setting a schedule for the filing of memoranda. The person electing the use of the shortened procedure, and any other interested entities, including the Commission staff, shall file, within 45 days of the notice, an initial memorandum that addresses the relevant facts and applicable law that support the position or positions taken regarding the matters at issue. Reply memoranda shall be filed within 20 days of the date by which the initial memoranda are due to be filed. Only participants who filed initial memoranda may file reply memoranda. Subpart T of part 385 of this chapter shall apply to all filings. Within 20 days after the last date that reply memoranda under the shortened procedure may be timely filed, the audited person who elected the shortened procedure may file a motion with the Commission requesting a trial-type hearing if new issues are raised by a party. To prevail in such a motion, the audited person must show that a party to the shortened procedure raised one or more new issues of material fact relevant to resolution of a matter in the shortened procedure such that fundamental fairness requires a trial-type hearing to resolve the new issue or issues so raised. Parties to the shortened procedure and the Commission staff may file responses to the motion. In ruling upon the motion, the Commission may determine that some or all of the issues be litigated in a trial-type hearing.

[Order 675, 71 FR 9706, Feb. 27, 2006]