alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 810.308 Approval of urban system nonhighway public mass transit projects. ( a ) An urban system public mass transit project may be approved by the UMTA Administrator when it is determined that: ( 1 ) The application and project are in accordance with the current UMTA procedures relating to discretionary capital assistance grants; and
( 2 ) Notification has been received from the FHWA Administrator that sufficient apportioned Federal-aid urban system funds are available to finance the Federal share of the cost of the proposed project.
( b ) Approval of the plans, specifications, and estimates of a nonhighway public mass transit project shall be deemed to occur on the date the UMTA Administrator approves the project application. This approval which is subject to the availability of obligation authority at the time of approval, will obligate the United States to pay its proportional share of the cost of the project.
( c ) Upon approval of an urban system nonhighway public mass transit project, the UMTA Administrator will execute a grant contract covering implementation of the project.
1 

### Moran, Nicole

From: William Bider <wbider@kdheks.gov> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 9:55 AM To: Moran, Nicole; Christine Mennicke Cc: Toensing, Don Subject: RE: Comment Letter - KS' Draft CCR Part 256 Plan

Nicole,

In studying your comments I have a question. Your comments related to 256.26 that relate to a state h aving the authority to grant compliance schedule extensions i nclude a recommendation that we look at pages 21,34 2 to 21,343 of the Federal Register. Are these correct page numbe rs. I did not see anything on these pages related to this subject?

Bill Bider
Director Bureau of Waste Management

From: Moran, Nicole [mailto:moran.nicole@epa.gov] Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 3:18 PM To: William Bider; Christine Mennicke Cc: Toensing, Don Subject: Comment Letter - KS' Draft CCR Part 256 Plan

Bill, Enclosed is an electronic copy of EPA’s Comment Let ter for the State of Kansas Draft Coal Combustion R esiduals Part 256 Plan submittal. The official letter is in the mail . Please make note that there were a few changes t o the checklist that you received yesterday following OGC’s review. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact myself or Don Toensing. Thanks, Nicole

Nicole Moran US Environmental Protection Agency, Region 7 Air and Waste Management Division Waste Enforcement and Materials Management Branch 11201 Renner Boulevard Lenexa, KS 66219 913-551-7641 (phone) moran.nicole@epa.gov
**Exhibit 10.2**

 

**THE SCOGROUP, INC.**

 

**SUMMARYOF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION**

 

The following table sets forth the annual base salaryfor each of the named executive officers of The SCO Group, Inc. (the “Company”)for fiscal year 2005:

 
| **Executive Officer**                                                      | ** ** | **Base Salary** | ** ** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------|------------|
|                                                                       |       |            |       |   |
| Darl C. McBride  President and Chief Executive Officer                     |       | $               | 265,000    |   |
|                                                                       |       |            |       |   |
| Bert B. Young  Chief Financial Officer                                     |       | $               | 170,000    |   |
|                                                                       |       |            |       |   |
| Christopher Sontag  Senior Vice President, Business Development            |       | $               | 160,000    |   |
|                                                                       |       |            |       |   |
| Jeff F. Hunsaker  Senior Vice President and General Manager, UNIX Division |       | $               | 160,000    |   |
|                                                                       |       |            |       |   |
| Ryan E. Tibbitts  General Counsel and Corporate Secretary                  |       | $               | 145,000    |   |

 

In addition to the foregoing amounts, each of theofficers named above is eligible to receive additional cash compensationpursuant to The SCO Group Employee Incentive Bonus Program for fiscal year 2005more particularly described in Item 5(a) of the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2005.

 

----
### §695h. Ownership by State of California of works constructed

Works constructed under the authorization of section 695e of this title, for the purpose of supplying State wildlife management areas with water, shall become the property of the State of California when constructed.

(Aug. 27, 1954, ch. 1012, §5, 68 Stat. 879.)
Exhibit 10.3

                            NEW YORK MUSIC EXPO, INC.
                              519 Bloomfield Avenue
                           Caldwell, New Jersey 07006

                                 January 3, 2000

Siti-Sites.com, Inc.
594 Broadway, Suite 1001
New York, New York 10012

      Re:   Purchase Agreement

Gentlemen:

      Steven Zuckerman ("Zuckerman") is the sole stockholder and the President
of New York Music Expo, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the "Company"), which
operates a business promoting music and internet conferences and expositions in
New York, San Francisco and in other cities (the "Expos"). Pursuant to a
Purchase Agreement dated January 3, 2000 (the "Purchase Agreement"), Zuckerman
sold to Siti-Sites.com, Inc. ("SITI"), among other things, all of the assets and
certain of the liabilities of the Expos.

      The Company hereby agrees to be bound by the terms and provisions of the
Purchase Agreement, including, without limitation, all representations and
warranties made by Zuckerman, to the extent they relate to the Expos, and hereby
confirms that it has sold, assigned and transferred the Expos as an ongoing
business to SITI, including, without limitation, all of their assets,
properties, contracts, client, artist and sponsor lists, archives, inventories,
banners, equipment, databases, website and related software, records and other
properties and assets in any form, subject only to existing liabilities set
forth on the balance sheet attached to the Purchase Agreement.

      This letter shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance
with the laws of New York.


                                          NEW YORK MUSIC EXPO, INC.


                                          By: /s/ Steven Zuckerman
                                              ------------------------------
                                          Name: Steven Zuckerman
                                          Title: President
§ 103.9 Request for further action on an approved benefit request. ( a ) *Filing a request.* A person may request further action on an approved benefit request as prescribed by the form instructions. Requests for further action may be submitted with the original benefit request or following the approval of such benefit.
( b ) *Processing.* The request will be approved if the requester has demonstrated eligibility for the requested action. There is no appeal from the denial of such request.
[Redesignated and amended at 76 FR 53781, Aug. 29, 2011]
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Anthony J. Renteria, Chief Executive Officer of Harrell Hospitality Group, Inc., (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(i)	the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2006 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (ii)	the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:    */s/ Anthony J. Renteria*
Name:   Anthony J. Renteria 
Title:    Chief Executive Officer 
Date:    January 12, 2007
<PAGE>

HERCULES INCORPORATED

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Hercules Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Fred G.
Aanonsen, Vice President and Controller, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Fred G. Aanonsen
----------------------------------
Fred G. Aanonsen
Vice President and Controller
March 31, 2003

                                       94
### §459a. Acceptance of donations; acquisition of property by purchase and condemnation

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to accept donations of land, interests in land, buildings, structures, and other property, within the boundaries of said national seashore recreational area as determined and fixed hereunder and donations of funds for the purchase and maintenance thereof, the title and evidence of title to lands acquired to be satisfactory to the Secretary of the Interior: Provided, That he may acquire on behalf of the United States under any donated funds by purchase, when purchasable at prices deemed by him reasonable, otherwise by condemnation under the provisions of section 3113 of title 40, such tracts of land within the said national seashore recreational area as may be necessary for the completion thereof.

(Aug. 17, 1937, ch. 687, §2, 50 Stat. 669; June 29, 1940, ch. 459, §1, 54 Stat. 702.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

"Section 3113 of title 40" substituted in text for "the Act of August 1, 1888" on authority of Pub. L. 107–217, §5(c), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1303, the first section of which enacted Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Words "national seashore recreational area" substituted in text for "national seashore" pursuant to act June 29, 1940.
#### § 500.103 Definitions.

Unless otherwise specified in this part, the definitions in 23 U.S.C. 101(a) are applicable to this part. As used in this part:

*Federal-aid highways* means those highways eligible for assistance under title 23, U.S.C., except those functionally classified as local or rural minor collectors.

*Metropolitan planning organization (MPO)* means the forum for cooperative transportation decision making for a metropolitan planning area.

*National Highway System (NHS)* means the system of highways designated and approved in accordance with the provisions of 23 U.S.C. 103(b).

*State* means any one of the fifty States, the District of Columbia, or Puerto Rico.

*Transportation management area (TMA)* means an urbanized area with a population over 200,000 (as determined by the latest decennial census) or other area when TMA designation is requested by the Governor and the MPO (or affected local officials), and officially designated by the Administrators of the FHWA and the FTA. The TMA designation applies to the entire metropolitan planning area(s).
### §2440. Jurisdiction of courts

The district courts of the United States shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any case or controversy arising under the provisions of this chapter or of any regulation promulgated under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 98–623, title III, §311, Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3405.)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 85675 / April 17, 2019

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-18480

In the Matter of 

GREEN INNOVATIONS LTD.

NOTICE THAT INITIAL DECISION HAS BECOME FINAL

The time for filing a petition for review of the initial decision in this proceeding has 

expired. No such petition has been filed by Green Innovations Ltd. and the Commission has not 

chosen to review the decision on its own initiative.

Accordingly, notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 360(d) of the Commission's Rules 

of Practice,1that the initial decision of the administrative law judge has become the final 

decision of the Commission with respect to Green Innovations Ltd.

2

The order contained in that 

decision is hereby declared final. The initial decision ordered that, pursuant to Section 12(j) of 

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrations of each class of registered securities of

Green Innovations Ltd. are revoked. The revocation is effective as of April 18, 2019.

For the Commission, by the Office of the General Counsel, pursuant to delegated 

authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

 Acting Secretary

 

1

 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(d).

2

 Grey Fox Holdings Corp. (f/k/a Gray Fox Petroleum Corp.), Green Innovations Ltd., and 

Red Giant Entm’t, Inc., Initial Decision Release No. 1325 (Dec. 6, 2018), 2018 WL 6402471.

The Central Index Key number for Green Innovations Ltd is: 1491471.
#### § 233.2 Transportation lines bringing aliens to the United States from or through foreign contiguous territory or adjacent islands.

Form I-420 shall be signed in duplicate and forwarded to the Headquarters Office of Inspections. After acceptance, each Regional Office of Inspections, the district office and the carrier will be furnished with one copy of the agreement. The transmittal letter to the Headquarters Office of Inspections shall indicate whether the signatory to the agreement is a subsidiary or affiliate of a line which has already signed a similar agreement. Correspondence regarding ancillary contracts for office space and other facilities to be furnished by transportation lines at Service stations in Canada shall be similarly handled.

[57 FR 59907, Dec. 17, 1992]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM HAWAIIAN
ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES' CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000354707
<NAME> HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         254,356
<SECURITIES>                                 1,971,886
<RECEIVABLES>                                  166,018
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,726
<INVENTORY>                                     45,412
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       2,994,317
<DEPRECIATION>                                 974,759
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,953,882
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        802,575
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           85,770
<PREFERRED>                                    148,293
<COMMON>                                       654,819
<OTHER-SE>                                     159,862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,953,882
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,463,979
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,252,121
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (201)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,669
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,607
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                141,783
<INCOME-TAX>                                    55,341
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             86,442
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    86,442
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.76<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.75
         
<FN> 
<F1> REPRESENTS EPS-BASIC
</FN>

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

Nos. 95-50911

 95-50917

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE MANUEL ENRIQUEZ-VARELA,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC Nos. 94-CR-411 & 95-CR-106

- - - - - - - - - -

June 3, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Manuel Enriquez-Varela appeals his guilty-plea

conviction for possession with intent to distribute heroin, in

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and failure to appear, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3146(a)(1). He argues that the district

court erred in declining to award a two-level decrease for

acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 and in

calculating his criminal history score.
Nos. 95-50911 & 95-50917 

-2-

We have reviewed the record, the briefs of the parties, and

the district court's oral ruling and find no reversible error. 

The district court did not err in finding that Enriquez's conduct

was not so extraordinary that adjustments for both obstruction of

justice and acceptance of responsibility would be appropriate. 

See United States v. Ayala, 47 F.3d 688, 691 (5th Cir. 1995). 

The district court's calculation of Enriquez's criminal history

score did not rise to the level of plain error. See United

States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en

banc).

AFFIRMED.
Docket No: FAA-2015-3983 Dir ID: 2015-NM-141-AD
#### John Zembedes, Defendant in Error, v. Louis Katsekas, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 15,232.

*Verdicts—when not disturbed as against the evidence.*A verdict will not be set aside on review as against the evidence unless clearly and manifestly against its weight.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Thomas B. Lantry, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1909.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 24, 1911.

William J. King, for plaintiff in error.

Whitman & Horner, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.

An action was brought by the defendant in error, John Zembedes, hereinafter called plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, Louis Katsekas, hereinafter called defendant, to recover the sum of $348, which the plaintiff claimed he had deposited with the defendant for safe keeping.

The case was tried by the court without a jury, and at the conclusion of the trial a finding and judgment in favor of the plaintiff was entered for the sum of $348.

The only ground urged for a reversal of the judgment is that the finding and judgment are manifestly against the clear weight of the evidence. We have carefully considered the evidence, and the printed and oral arguments of counsel. The evidence on the main questions of fact is conflicting particularly the testimony of the parties to the case. There is evidence tending to corroborate the testimony of each of the parties. We do not think it would subserve any useful purpose to indulge in a discussion in detail of the evidence, most of which was given through interpreters, *536and is unsatisfactory as it appears in the record. We ■ are of the opinion that we cannot say from the record that the finding and judgment of the court below are manifestly against the weight of the evidence. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

*'Affirmed.*
# No. 03-14-00716-CV

**In The Third Court of Appeals Austin, Texas** 

J ANOS F ARKAS , Appellant,

v.

W ELLS F ARGO B ANK , N.A., AND B RICE V ANDER L INDEN & W ERNIC , P.C.,

N

/ KA / B UCKELY M ADOLE , P.C.

Appellees.

________________ _____________________________________________________

Cause No. D-1-GN-11-003692 On Appeal from the 201st Judicial District Court, Travis County, Texas The Honorable Lora J. Livingston, Judge Presiding

________________ _____________________________________________________

N OTICE OF A PPEARANCE OF A DDITIONAL C OUNSEL

TO THE HONORABLE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS:

Pursuant to Rule 6.2 of the Texas Ru les of Appellate Pro cedure, Susan A.

Kidwell of Locke Lord LLP hereby files th is Notice of Appearance as Additional

Counsel for Appellee We lls Fargo Bank, N.A. ACCEPTED 03-14-00716-CV 3919973 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/27/2015 3:59:09 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK2 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is also re presented by B. David L. Foster.

Respectfully submitted,

L OCKE L ORD LLP

By: /s/ Susan A. Kidwell B. David L. Foster

State Bar No. 24031555 dfoster@lockelord.com Susan A. Kidwell State Bar No. 24032626 skidwell@lockelord.com
L OCKE L ORD LLP 600 Congress Avenue, Suite 2200 Austin, Texas 78701 Telephone: (512) 305-4700 Facsimile: (512) 305-4800

C OUNSEL FOR A PPELLEE W ELLS F ARGO B ANK , N.A.3 C ERTIFICATE OF S ERVICE

I certify that on January 27, 2015 a true and correct copy of the foregoing was

served by Ef ileTx.gov upon the following:

William D. Davis bdavis@capital-ip.com Davis & Associates P.O. Box 1093 Dripping Springs, Texas 78620

A TTORNEY FOR A PPELLANT J ANOS F ARKAS Luke Madole Luke.Madole@BuckleyMadole.com Buckley Madole, P.C. 9441 LBJ Freeway, Suite 250 Dallas, Texas 75243

A TTORNEYS FOR A PPELLEE B RICE V ANDER L INDEN & W ERNICK , P.C. N / K /

A B UCKLEY M ADOLE , P.C.

/s/ Susan A. Kidwell
Susan A. Kidwell
### §571c. Erection of permanent facilities on land not owned by United States; long term leases

Notwithstanding the provisions of existing law and without regard to sections 3111 and 3112 of title 40, but within the limitations of cost otherwise applicable, appropriations of the Forest Service may be expended for the erection of buildings, lookout towers, and other structures on land owned by States, counties, municipalities, or other political subdivisions, corporations, or individuals: Provided, That prior to such erection there is obtained the right to use the land for the estimated life of or need for the structure, including the right to remove any such structure within a reasonable time after the termination of the right to use the land.

(Apr. 24, 1950, ch. 97, §1, 64 Stat. 82.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

"Sections 3111 and 3112 of title 40" substituted in text for "section 355, Revised Statutes, as amended (40 U.S.C. 255)" on authority of Pub. L. 107–217, §5(c), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1303, the first section of which enacted Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works.