alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Infiltration and permeability of weathered crystalline rocks, Georgia Nuclear Laboratory, Dawson County, Georgia

By: J. W. Stewart

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1133D

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (2213 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (860 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 3**                            (871 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 4**                            (865 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 5**                            (874 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 6**                            (831 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 7**                            (812 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jerry Albert BOONE, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 01-30149. D.C. No. CR-00-00129-EJL.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 6, 2002.*

Decided May 8, 2002.

*370Before RYMER, MCKEOWN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

This case arises from Jerry Boone’s conviction for his knowing failure to surrender for service of a criminal sentence. 18 U.S.C. § 3146(a)(2). Boone’s single claim on appeal is that the district court abused its discretion in refusing, on relevancy grounds, to admit into evidence Boone’s pro se motion to dismiss the case that gave rise to the order to surrender. Boone claims that his filing of the motion evidences that his failure to surrender was not knowing. We are unpersuaded by Boone’s argument. In fact, Boone filed the pro se motion *after*he was supposed to surrender and nothing in the record, including the motion itself, evidences Boone’s motivation or expectations regarding the motion. The decision to exclude the motion was squarely within the district court’s discretion.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### § 636.502 Why should I use discussions?

You should use discussions to maximize your ability to obtain the best value, based on the requirements and the evaluation factors set forth in the solicitation.
**Exhibit 32.2**

****

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the AnnualReport of Hickok Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for theperiodending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory M. Zoloty,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

-   the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and 

-   the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/ G. M. Zoloty

G. M. Zoloty

Chief Financial Officer

December 23, 2008
### §669f. Payment of funds to States; laws governing construction and labor

(a) When the Secretary of the Interior shall find that any project approved by him has been completed or, if involving research relating to wildlife, is being conducted, in compliance with said plans and specifications, he shall cause to be paid to the proper authority of said State the amount set aside for said project. The Secretary of the Interior may, in his discretion, from time to time, make payments on said project as the same progresses; but these payments, including previous payments, if any, shall not be more than the United States pro rata share of the project in conformity with said plans and specifications. If a State has elected to avail itself of the benefits of this chapter by preparing a comprehensive fish and wildlife plan as provided for under option (1) of subsection (a) of section 669e of this title, and this plan has been approved by the Secretary of the Interior, then the Secretary may, in his discretion, and under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, advance funds to the State for financing the United States pro rata share agreed upon between the State fish and game department and the Secretary.

(b) Any construction work and labor in each State shall be performed in accordance with its laws and under the direct supervision of the State fish and game department, subject to the inspection and approval of the Secretary of the Interior and in accordance with rules and regulations made pursuant to this chapter. The Secretary of the Interior and the State fish and game department of each State may jointly determine at what times and in what amounts payments shall be made under this chapter. Such payments shall be made by the Secretary of the Treasury, on warrants drawn by the Secretary of the Interior against the said fund to such official or officials, or depository, as may be designated by the State fish and game department and authorized under the laws of the State to receive public funds of the State.

(Sept. 2, 1937, ch. 899, §7, 50 Stat. 919; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. II, §4(f), eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2731, 53 Stat. 1433; Pub. L. 91–503, title I, §102, Oct. 23, 1970, 84 Stat. 1100.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1970—Pub. L. 91–503 divided existing provisions into subsecs. (a) and (b), permitted advance payments to the States for work which has been adequately defined in a comprehensive fish and wildlife plan, and struck out reference to progress payments in provision covering joint determination of time and amounts of payments.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Reorg. Plan No. II of 1939, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, transferred functions of Secretary of Agriculture relating to conservation of wildlife, game, and migratory birds to Secretary of the Interior.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of BlastGard International, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the companys financial condition and results of operations.





May 15, 2008





/s/ Michael J. Gordon

Michael J. Gordon, Chief Financial Officer



---
Exhibit 32

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

         In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  of  FreeStar   Technology
Corporation  ("Registrant")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended  December 31,
2004 as filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  ("Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify
pursuant to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  Section
1350) that to their knowledge:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Dated: February 11, 2005          By: /s/  Paul Egan
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                           Paul Egan, President

Dated: February 11, 2005          By: /s/  Ciaran Egan
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                           Ciaran Egan, Chief Financial Officer
# HHRIKTITIA n SINC E 189 4 

## ii^RTivlENTO F ^-'ASPORTATIO N -..•:--cTOFFRATION S

Februar y9 , 201 2 Docke tManagemen tFacilit y U.S . Departmen t o fTransportation , 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenu e SE. , Wes t Buildin g Groun d Floor , Roo m W12-140 . .Washington . D C 20590. , . . _. . Re : Su n Countr ySlo t Exemptio n - Docke t Numbe rFAA-2012-008 9 Ladie s an d Gentlemen : Su n Countr yAirline s ha s requeste d a n exemptio n fro m th e slo t limi t fo rRonal d Reaga n Washingto n Nationa l Airpor t (DCA ) se tfort h i n § 93.123(a) . t o permi t th e FA At o creat e ai rcarrie rslot s durin g certai n limite d hour s fo rSu n Country' s use . Th e propose d ai rcarrie rslot s woul d replac e tw o slo t exemption s unde rDO TOrde r2010-12-1 6 awarde d t o Su n Country . O n Januar y6 , 2012 . th e Unite d State s Cour t o fAppeal s fo rth e Distric to fColumbi a Circui t vacate d th e DO TOrder , an d Su n Countr y wil l los e it s existin g servic e betwee n DC Aan d Lansing' s Capita l Regio n Internationa l Airport . Specifically . Su n Countr ydesire s on e dail yslo tdurin g eac h o fth e 100 0 an d I 10 0 hours . Th e propose d exemptio n woul d permi t Su n Countr yt o continu e operatin g it s existin g service s an d avoi d a n inequitabl e resul t o fth e Court' s order . Th e Su n Countr yDC Aservic e i s essentia l t o th e economi cgrowt h o fth e Greate rLansin g Region . Th e dail yservic e i s th e onl ylarg e aircraf t(737-800 ) servic e t o Washingto n Reaga n Airport , i n th e stat e o f Michiga n outsid e o fDetroi LPrio rt o Su n Country , th e regiona l communit yha d requeste d th e introductio n o fthi s servic e fro m numerou s othe rairlin e operator s withou t success . Accordingly , i t i s critica l tha tth e FA Atak e th e necessar ystep s t o ensur e th e continuatio n o fth e Su n Countr yslot s a t th e establishe d fligh t time s i n suppor to fGreate rLansing' s busines s an d economi cgrowth . You rimmediat e approva l o fthi s exemption , s o tha t Su n Countr yca n begi n t o ente rflight s schedule s fo r sal e fo rth e balanc e o f2012 . wil l b e gread yappreciated . Sincerely , T h e Christma n Compan y

le s M . Cas h Executiv e Vic e Presiden t

Th e Chrisimj n Compan yTh e Cfirisijna rBuildm g 20 8 N C.ipno l Avenu ? L.irisin g Michig.i n •18933- I 3S 7
###### Editorial Note on Part 1241

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1241 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and 68 FR 10357, Mar. 5, 2003.

#### § 1241.2 Warrant of removal; detention of aliens during removal period.

For the regulations of the Department of Homeland Security with respect to the detention and removal of aliens who are subject to a final order of removal, see 8 CFR part 241.

[70 FR 674, Jan. 5, 2005]
### §552b. Administration of withdrawn lands; rules and regulations

Lands withdrawn under the provisions of sections 552a to 552d of this title shall be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture under such agreements for the protection of the watershed as he may make with the municipality concerned, and the Secretary of Agriculture is authorized, in addition to the rules and regulations adopted for the administration of the national forests, to adopt and prescribe such further rules and regulations as he considers necessary to effect the adequate protection of the watershed, including a rule or regulation forbidding persons other than forest officers and representatives of the municipality from going on the lands so reserved or making any use whatever thereof.

(May 28, 1940, ch. 220, §2, 54 Stat. 224.)
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of Opus
Resource Group, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the
company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the company's financial condition and results of operations.


December 22, 2003


/s/ Robert P. Gordon
----------------------------------------------
Robert P. Gordon, Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 163 (Thursday, August 22, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 52087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20416]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2011-0502; FRL-9900-30-Region 5]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Wisconsin; Disapproval of PM2.5 Permitting Requirements; 
Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA published a final rule in the Federal Register on July 25, 
2013, disapproving a Wisconsin State Implementation Plan revision 
pertaining to permitting requirements relating to particulate matter of 
less than 2.5 micrometers (PM2.5). An error in the 
amendatory instruction is identified and corrected in this action.

DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective on August 26, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christos Panos, Environmental 
Engineer, Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs 
Branch (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West 
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353-8328, 
panos.christos@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA published a final rule document on July 
25, 2013, (78 FR 44881) disapproving revisions to Wisconsin rules NR 
400, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408 and 484, submitted by the State on May 12, 
2011, because the rule revisions submitted are not consistent with 
Federal regulations governing state permitting programs. In this 
disapproval EPA erroneously stated that the revision was being made to 
40 CFR 52 Subpart P--Indiana, but the language should have said the 
revision was being made to Subpart YY--Wisconsin. Therefore, the 
amendatory instruction is being corrected to reflect the corrected 
subpart reference.

Correction

    In the final rule published in the Federal Register on July 25, 
2013, (78 FR 44881), on page 44884, second column, below amendatory 
instruction 1, ``Subpart P--Indiana'' is corrected to read: ``Subpart 
YY--Wisconsin''.

    Dated: August 12, 2013.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2013-20416 Filed 8-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
#### Morris Markowitz v. E. J. Wile Company.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §698q. Little River Canyon National Preserve; establishment

#### (a) In general

In order to protect and preserve the natural, scenic, recreational, and cultural resources of the Little River Canyon area in DeKalb and Cherokee Counties, Alabama, and to provide for the protection and public enjoyment of the resources, there is established the Little River Canyon National Preserve (referred to in sections 698q to 698t of this title as the "Preserve").

#### (b) Area included

#### (1) In general

The Preserve shall consist of the lands, waters, and interests in lands and waters generally depicted on the boundary map entitled "Little River Canyon National Preserve", numbered NA–LRNP–80,001C, and dated March 1992.

#### (2) Boundary expansion

The boundary of the Preserve is modified to include the land depicted on the map entitled "Little River Canyon National Preserve Proposed Boundary", numbered 152/80,004, and dated December 2007.

#### (c) Map

The maps referred to in subsection (b) shall—

(1) be on file and available for public inspection in the offices of the National Park Service of the Department of the Interior in Washington, District of Columbia; and

(2) be filed with the appropriate offices of DeKalb and Cherokee Counties in the State of Alabama.

#### (d) Publication of description

Not later than 6 months after October 21, 1992, the Secretary of the Interior (referred to in sections 698q to 698t of this title as the "Secretary") shall publish in the Federal Register a detailed description of the boundaries of the Preserve.

(Pub. L. 102–427, §2, Oct. 21, 1992, 106 Stat. 2179; Pub. L. 111–11, title VII, §7103, Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1190.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2009—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–11, §7103(1), designated existing provisions as par. (1), inserted heading, and added par. (2).

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 111–11, §7103(2), substituted "maps" for "map" in introductory provisions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 102–427, §1, Oct. 21, 1992, 106 Stat. 2179, provided that: "This Act [enacting this section and sections 698r to 698t of this title] may be cited as the 'Little River Canyon National Preserve Act of 1992'."
Responses to Questions EPA Posed in December 20, 2012 Final Rule on Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units:
Reconsideration and Final Amendments; Non

- Hazardous Secondary Materials That Are Solid Waste: Final Rule

Non

- Pulp & Paper Facilities

# Industry Sector Boiler Type (kilns, stoker, circulating fluidized bed, etc.) Traditional Fuel Questions Fuel Type i.e. fuel oil, #6 bunker C, etc. % Boiler
Can Burn

Traditional

Fuel 1

1 Power Plant stoker boilers with traveling grates to remove the ash Startup with natural gas then go to 100% coal to 100% biomass. They prefer at least 50% biomass. With 50% or more biomass that may use the ash as

fertilizer. 0%

2 Electricity generator. Power and steam generation only. Consumes all steam and some power but most is sold to the grid. Stoker Has used fuel oil in the past. 100% biomass including scrap ties, are used as fuel. NG used only after a plant shutdown to restart. 10 0%

3 Electricity generator. Power and steam generation only. Consumes all steam and some power but most is sold to the grid. 2 cogeneration stations, one using a stoker and the other

uses the fluidized bed. 100% biomass including scrap ties, are used as fuel. NG used only after a plant shutdown to restart. Fuel

oil can be b urned if nozzles were installed. 0%

4 Electricity generator. Produces power and steam. Consumes all steam and some power but most is sold to the grid. Stoker Capable of burning fuel oil but does so only for start

up. Burns 100% biomass including scrap ties. 100%

5 Generating Station/Resource Recovery Facility Fluidized Bed Boiler (x2) Wood Waste 100%

6 Power Generation Traveling Grate Ground up railroad ties, biomass (bark and sawdust)

from satellite wood

- yards & sawmills and forest

residuals from clearing. Originally designed to burn

coal. 0%

7 Paper/Power Bubbling Bed Currently

- Biomass, coal, ground up railroad ties, TDF sludge. Next Phase: All the above except coal. 0%

8 Electrical Power Traveling Grate Whole railroad ties, creosote treated wood, clean,

untreated construction & demolition wood 0%

9 Power Generating Traveling Grate Biomass

- yard waste

- C&D

- landfill gas

- TDF, ground up

railroad ties 0%

10 Power Generation Circulation fluidized bed Natural Gas , r ecycled material (agricultural biomass, railroad ties) . Cannot burn fuel oil at this time. 0%

11 Power Generation Traveling grate boiler Natural Gas, propane, recycled materials (agricultural biomass, clean construction wood, railroad ties), c ould burn liquid fuel

without modification to the boiler if an appropriate delivery system was installed 0%

1 It should be noted that the boilers could be retrofit with nozzles and a delivery system to burn fuel oil and other liquid fu els but the facilities showing 0% do not have those systems installed at the present time.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 87851 / December 23, 2019

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-19541

In the Matter of

FCA US LLC and FIAT

CHRYSLER AUTOMOBILES N.V.

Respondent. 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

EXTENSION ORDER

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested an extension of time until 

June 30, 2020 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution under Rule 1101(a) of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(a).

On September 27, 2019, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist 

Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21C of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a 

Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”)1 against FCA US LLC and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V.

(collectively, the “Respondents”). The Order required the Respondents to pay a $40 million 

civil money penalty to the Commission. The Commission also created a Fair Fund, pursuant 

to Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, so the civil money penalty can be 

distributed to harmed investors.

In its request for an extension of time, the Division states that it needs time to solicit 

and evaluate fund administrator proposals, develop the distribution methodology, and develop 

the plan of distribution.

 

1

 Securities Act Rel. No. 10706 (Sept. 27, 2019).
2

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s 

request for an extension of time until June 30, 2020 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution 

is granted.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority. 

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary