alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §460vv–7. Botanical areas

#### (a) Designation

In order to protect and interpret to the public area within the Ouachita National Forest which contain unique plant species and unique plant communities that are significant in their occurrence, variety and location, the following lands are hereby designated as botanical areas:

(1) Certain lands in the Ouachita National Forest, Oklahoma, which comprise approximately eight thousand and twenty-six acres as generally depicted on a map entitled "Robert S. Kerr Memorial Arboretum, Nature Center and Botanical Area—Proposed", dated March 1988, which shall be known as the "Robert S. Kerr Memorial Arboretum, Nature Center and Botanical Area".

(2) Certain lands in the Ouachita National Forest, Oklahoma, which comprise approximately four hundred acres as generally depicted on a map entitled "Beech Creek Botanical Area—Proposed", dated March 1988, which shall be known as the "Beech Creek Botanical Area".

#### (b) Map and description

The Secretary of Agriculture shall, as soon as practicable after October 18, 1988, file a map and a legal description of the botanical areas with the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs and the Committee on Agriculture of the United States House of Representatives and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the United States Senate. Each such map and legal description shall have the same force and effect as if included in this subchapter; except that correction of clerical and typographical errors in such legal description and map may be made. The map and legal description shall be on file and available for public inspection in the Office of the Chief of the Forest Service, Department of Agriculture.

#### (c) Administration

The Secretary shall administer the botanical areas in accordance with the laws, rules and regulations applicable to the national forests in such manner as will best further the purposes of this section, as set forth in subsection (a). Except as provided in section 460vv–14 of this title, vegetative manipulation, including the cutting of trees, shall be permitted in such areas only when necessary for the protection and interpretation of the unique plant species and unique plant communities within the area. The Secretary may permit expansion of roads, improvements, and other facilities in the vicinity of the Robert S. Kerr Nature Center.

(Pub. L. 100–499, §9, Oct. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 2495.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the House of Representatives changed to Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives on Jan. 5, 1993, by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Third Congress.
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR EQUIVALENT

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report of Hitachi, Ltd. on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2006 (the Report) pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Exchange
Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Kazuo Furukawa, President of Hitachi, Ltd., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hitachi, Ltd.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |     |  |                             
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------
|Date:    August 7, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Kazuo Furukawa          
|                        |  |     |  | Name:         Kazuo Furukawa
|                        |  |     |  | Title:           President
CS 315822-B 09/18/2020

10 вещей, которые вы можете сделать, чтобы 

контролировать симптомы COVID-19 в домашних условиях

Доступная версия: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/if-you-are-sick/steps-when-sick.html

Если у вас подозреваемое или подтвержденное заболевание COVID-19:

1. Оставайтесь дома, не 

ходите на работу или в 

школу. И оставайтесь вдали 

от других общественных 

мест. Если вам необходимо 

выйти, избегайте поездок на 

любом виде общественного 

транспорта, совместно 

используемых транспортных 

средствах или такси.

2. Наблюдайте за вашими 

симптомами внимательно. 

Если ваши симптомы 

проявятся сильнее, 

немедленно позвоните 

вашему поставщику 

медицинских услуг. 

3. Отдыхайте и избегайте 

обезвоживания. 

4. Если у вас назначен 

медицинский визит, 

позвоните медицинскому 

работнику заранее и 

сообщите ему, что у вас есть 

или может быть COVID-19.

5. Для получения неотложной 

медицинской помощи 

позвоните 911 и сообщите 

персоналу диспетчерской, 

что у вас есть или может 

быть COVID-19.

6. Если вы кашляете или 

чихаете, прикрывайте рот и 

нос салфеткой или используйте 

внутреннюю часть локтя.

7. Часто мойте руки с водой 

и мылом в течение не менее 

20 секунд или протирайте 

руки дезинфицирующим 

средством для рук на 

спиртовой основе, содержащим 

не менее 60 % спирта. 

8. Насколько возможно, 

оставайтесь в отдельной 

комнате и вдали от других людей в вашем доме. Кроме 

того, вы должны пользоваться 

отдельной ванной комнатой, 

если есть такая возможность. 

Если вам необходимо 

находиться среди других 

людей внутри дома или вне его, 

надевайте маску для лица.

9. Избегайте совместного 

использования предметов 

личного обихода с другими 

людьми в вашей семье, таких 

как посуда, полотенца и 

постельные принадлежности.

10. Протирайте все поверхности,

к которым часто прикасаются, 

такие как столешницы, крышки 

столов и дверные ручки. 

Используйте бытовые чистящие 

средства в форме спрея или 

салфетки в соответствии с 

инструкциями на этикетке.

cdc.gov/coronavirus
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Edward THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-7372.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2002.

Decided May 22, 2002.

*939James Edward Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

James Edward Thomas seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001) and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on • the reasoning of the district court.**United States v. Thomas,*Nos. CR-97-299; CA-00-206-3-1-V (W.D.N.C. Apr. 23 *&*July 19, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

 To the extent Thomas attempts to argue issues not raised in his § 2255 motion, those issues are not considered here because he has not shown exceptional circumstances. *See Muth v. United States,*1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993).
### §539m–10. Judicial review

#### (a) Enforcement

A civil action to enforce the provisions of sections 539m to 539m–12 of this title may be brought to the extent permitted under chapter 7 of title 5. Judicial review shall be based on the administrative record and subject to the applicable standard of review set forth in section 706 of title 5.

#### (b) Waiver

A civil action may be brought against the Pueblo for declaratory judgment or injunctive relief under sections 539m to 539m–12 of this title, but no money damages, including costs or attorney's fees, may be imposed on the Pueblo as a result of such judicial action.

#### (c) Venue

Venue for any civil action provided for in this section, as well as any civil action to contest the constitutionality of sections 539m to 539m–12 of this title, shall lie only in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico.

(Pub. L. 108–7, div. F, title IV, §412, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 291.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 539m to 539m–12 of this title, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title IV of div. F of Pub. L. 108–7, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 279, which is classified generally to sections 539m to 539m–12 of this title. For complete classification of title IV to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 539m of this title and Tables.
### §6805. Cooperative agreements

#### (a) Fee management agreement

Notwithstanding chapter 63 of title 31, the Secretary may enter into a fee management agreement, including a contract, which may provide for a reasonable commission, reimbursement, or discount, with the following entities for the following purposes:

(1) With any governmental or nongovernmental entity, including those in a gateway community, for the purpose of obtaining fee collection and processing services, including visitor reservation services.

(2) With any governmental or nongovernmental entity, including those in a gateway community, for the purpose of obtaining emergency medical services.

(3) With any governmental entity, including those in a gateway community, to obtain law enforcement services.

#### (b) Revenue sharing

A State or legal subdivision of a State that enters into an agreement with the Secretary under subsection (a) may share in a percentage of the revenues collected at the site in accordance with that fee management agreement.

#### (c) County proposals

The Secretary shall consider any proposal submitted by a county to provide services described in subsection (a). If the Secretary decides not to enter into a fee management agreement with the county under subsection (a), the Secretary shall notify the county in writing of the decision, identifying the reasons for the decision. The fee management agreement may include cooperative site planning and management provisions.

(Pub. L. 108–447, div. J, title VIII, §806, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3387.)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Before the 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 57607 / April 2, 2008 

Administrative Proceeding 

File No. 3-11515 

____________________________________ 

 : 

In the Matter of : 

 : Order Approving and Ratifying 

CHARLES W. CROUSE and : Prior Disbursement and 

NORMAN R. HESS : Approving Future Disbursement 

 : of Fair Fund 

Respondents : 

____________________________________: 

 On October 26, 2005, the Commission issued its Order Approving Plan of Fund 

Distribution, Appointing Administrator, and Consolidating Settlement Funds for 

Administration (Rel. No. 34-52678). The disgorgement, prejudgment interest and civil 

monetary penalty totaling $34,384.65 paid by Hess and the disgorgement and 

prejudgment interest totaling $74,945.71, which has been partly paid by Crouse, are to 

be held by the Commission’s Office of Financial Management in a Fair Fund, pursuant to 

Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Fair Fund”). On December 15, 

2005, an initial distribution of $63,950.00 was made from that Fair Fund according to 

the terms of the Plan of Distribution approved by the Order. 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the initial distribution described above is 

approved and ratified as of the day of distribution, December 15, 2005. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon subsequent direction of the Fund 

Administrator, in accordance with the terms of the Plan, the Commission will disburse the 

remaining Fair Funds. 

 By the Commission. 

 Nancy M. Morris 

 Secretary
**EXHIBIT 32.1****SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Surgical Partners International, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, William H. Wilcox, President and Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        /s/ William H. Wilcox   William H. Wilcox  President and Chief Executive Officer   August 3, 2006A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 92950 / September 13, 2021

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension of trading 

in the securities of the following issuer, commencing at 9:30 a.m. EDT on September 14, 2021 

and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 27, 2021:

 ARC Group, Inc. (RLLY)

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of the foregoing company due 

to a lack of current and accurate information about the company because it has not filed certain 

periodic reports with the Commission. This order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).

The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by this company.

Brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11, at 

the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered relating to the securities 

of the subject company unless and until the broker or dealer has strictly complied with all of the 

provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by the rule, it 

should refrain from entering quotations relating to the securities of this company that has been 

subject to a trading suspension until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is 

certain that all of its provisions have been met. Any broker or dealer with questions regarding

the rule should contact the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, DC 

at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of the rule,

the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action. 

If any broker, dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, they 

should immediately communicate it to the Delinquent Filings Branch of the Division of 

Enforcement at (202) 551-5466, or by e-mail at DelinquentFilings@sec.gov.
(No. 77-CC-2290

#### George E. Parsons, Claimant, v. The State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 23, 1981.*

Awerkamp and McClain (Lucinda Awerkamp, of counsel), for Claimant.

Tyrone C. Fahner, Attorney General (William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

Holderman, J.

Claimant in this cáse is attempting to collect compensation from May 9, 1977, through June 30, 1977, with the exception of June 23, 1977.

The record shows that Claimant requested retirement as of July 1, 1977, and accepted the benefits of retirement on that date. Claimant requested vacation as of May 9, 1977, which was granted.

It appears from the record that Claimant was a very dedicated individual and extremely interested in his work. During the period of his vacation, Claimant, according to his testimony, spent a great deal of time doing work that he was accustomed to doing while in the performance of his duties for the State.

Claimant was paid for six (6) days by a warrant issued in the amount of $300.00 which Claimant did not cash because he was afraid it would jeopardize his retirement by accepting a warrant issued after the commencement of his retirement.

The record discloses that Claimant did not keep a *128timely record of the periods of time he was supposed to be working. In his letter of retirement, Claimant indicated he would retire only if a certain individual was appointed to fill the vacancy caused by his retirement.

By letter dated May 11, 1977, Claimant was informed that his use of vacation time from May 9, 1977, to July 1, 1977, was approved, and that Mr. William Phillips would be responsible for the supervision of the District IV staff, which was the staff of Claimant.

The record fails to disclose any agreement or contract by which the State agreed to compensate Claimant for work allegedly done while on vacation, part of which time was spent lobbying to get the Commission’s bills passed and also endeavoring to secure the appointment of the man he wanted to be his successor. The record is also completely devoid of any authorization from his agency requesting he do any of the work he allegedly did while on vacation.

While it was commendable that Claimant was interested in his work and thought enough of it to work during his vacation, this in itself does not create an obligation on the part of Respondent.

Claimant should be paid the sum of three hundred ($300.00) dollars, representing the warrant that he turned back, which was for days he actually worked.

Claimant having failed to prove he is entitled to extra vacation pay, other than the three hundred dollars above mentioned, said case is dismissed.
#### Cushman & Wakefield, Inc., Appellant, v. General Motors Corporation, Respondent.

*719No opinion. Present—■ Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0471

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CARESSA JILL HARDY, aka

GLENN LEE DIBLEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion, and good cause 

appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Unseal Confidential 

Transcript and Supplement the Record is GRANTED. Exhibits 1 and 2 

to the motion shall be placed in the file of this Court for this cause. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 16 2022

05/16/2022

Case Number: DA 19-0471
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32

                        WORLD MARKETING, INC. FORM 10-QSB
                     FOR THE QUARTER ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2006
      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Jacob Roth, certify that

1.       I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of World
         Marketing, Inc.

2.       Attached to this certification is Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
         November 30, 2006, a periodic report (the "periodic report") filed by
         the issuer with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the
         "Exchange Act"), which contains condensed financial statements.

3.       I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
         pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

         o        The periodic report containing the condensed financial
                  statements fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and

         o        The information in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
                  material respects, the consolidated financial condition and
                  results of operations of the issuer for the periods presented.


January 12, 2007                              /s/ Jacob Roth
                                              --------------------------
                                              Jacob Roth
                                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                              Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by World Marketing, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 even if the document with which it is submitted to the Securities and
Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.
CARDOZO LAW SCHOOL 

SECURITIES ARBITRATION CLINIC 

PROFESSOR ELIZABETH GOLDMAN
MARGIN DEBT IN 

RETAIL 

CUSTOMER 

ACCOUNTS

 Margin debt in retail customer accounts 

is at 635,275 million as of the end of 

October, 2023 a significant increase 

from pre-pandemic levels of margin debt

 Rises in volatility have also engendered 

swings in margin debt nearing almost a 

billion dollars a year ago

 Money borrowed on margin is being 

used primarily to trade options 

contracts
MARGIN DEBT IS BEING USED TO TRADE OPTIONS

 Options contracts are purchased, sold 

and valued in the market based on 

whether certain securities are likely to 

go up or down in value in the future

 Option contracts must be exercised 

before their expiration date – when 

you buy or sell actual shares pursuant 

to the contract -otherwise they expire 

worthless
TRADING ON OPTIONS 

IMPACT ON THE SMALL UNSOPHISTICATED RETAIL INVESTOR

 Small retail investors are engaging in options trading in record numbers

 Equity options trading is up significantly on all options trading 

platforms since the beginning of the pandemic

 Options trading is complicated,

 Presents high risks, and

 Has rules that risk customers being forced out of their positions 
SMALL RETAIL CUSTOMERS CAN END UP OWING THEIR BROKERAGE FIRMS 

MONEY FOR SHORTFALLS IN THEIR ACCOUNTS
ISSUES IMPACTING SMALL RETAIL INVESTORS WITH OPTIONS 

ACCOUNTS

 Understanding the information on your screen

 Trading restrictions

 Positions can be closed out at the Broker-Dealer’s option to manage risk

 Automatic exercise or not?

 When something goes wrong – technical glitches
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            ( 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of HMI Industries Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A (the "Report") for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Julie A. McGraw,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                                     /s/ Julie A. McGraw
                                                     -------------------
                                                     Julie A. McGraw
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     December  17, 2004