1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004

- 2595  p202 624

- 2500  f202 628

- 5116

F

Marc L. Warren

(202) 624

- 2531

mwarren@crowell.com

October 9 , 2015

VIA FDMS

Ms. Cheryl Collins

Program Manager, Docket Operations

Docket Management Facility

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12

- 140

Attn: FAA Dockets

Washington, DC 20590

Re: E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company

– Petition for Exemption

Dear Ms. Collins :

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (“FMRA”) 1

and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company

, on behalf of itself and its

subsidiary companies (collectively, “Du P ont”)

, 2 petitions for an exemption from the Federal

Aviation Regulations identified herein to authorize DuPont to operate small unmanned aircraft

systems (“sUAS”) for aerial data collection pertaining to agricultural field and remote

infrastructure inspec tions

. 3 DuPont’s sUAS o perations will be conducted under the safeguards

described in this petition and as may be further established by FAA.

FAA has now issued over 1, 8 00 Section 333 exemptions to various commercial

enterprises for sUAS applications ranging from aerial photography and cinematography to

precision agriculture and flare stack, bridge and tower inspections. 4 Indeed, FAA has granted

hundreds of Section 333 exemption s for aerial data collection in circumstances that are similar

1 Pub. L. No. 112

- 95, § 333, 126 Stat. 76.

2 A list of the DuP ont subsidiary companies seeking Sectio n 333 exemption authority to conduct

the sUAS operations described in this petition is set forth on Appendix A hereto.

3 This exemption request is based on the information provided in this petition and the user

manuals for DuPont’s DJI Phantom 3S, Precisionhawk Lancaster, Aibot X6, Steadidrone HX6, AscTec Falcon 8 and

AirCover QR

- 425 sUAS (collectively, the “Manuals”)

, copies of which are either already on file with FAA or will be

provided upon request

. See, e.g., In the Matter of the Petition of Unmanned Experts, Inc., Grant of Exemption No.

12075 (Jul. 17, 2015), Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 1370 (AscTec Falcon 8) ; In the Matter of the Petition of Union Pacific

Railroad

, Grant of Exemption No. 11353 (Apr. 17, 2015), Docke t No. FAA

- 2014

- 1105 (AirCover QR

- 425) ; In the

Matter of the Petition of Mesa Associates, Inc.

, Grant of Exemption No. 12469 (Aug. 14, 2015), Docket No. FAA

2015

- 2197 (Aibotix X6 and PrecisionHawk Lancaster); In the Matter of the Petition of James Michael H ourihan,

Grant of Exemption No. 11925 (Jun. 26, 2015), Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 1347 (DJI Phantom 3S) ; and In the Matter of

the Petition of Aerial Concepts LLC

, Grant of Exemption No. 12254 (Jul. 31, 2015), Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 2060

(Steadidrone)

.

4 See FAA, Authorizations Granted Via Section 333 Exemptions (rev. Oct

. 9 , 2015),

https://www.faa.gov/uas/legislative_programs/section_333/333_authorizations/

.FAA Dockets

Octo ber 9 , 2015

Page 2

in all material respects to those propose d here. 5 In issuing those exemption s and other S ection

333 g rants

, FAA found that “the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned aircraft (UA)

with the specificati ons described by the petitioner

... gives the FAA good cause to find that the

UAS operation enabled by this exemption is in the public interest

. ” 6 The same public interest

and safety justifica tions apply to DuPont’s petition, and should enable FAA to grant it on an

expedited basis.

I. Petitioner

Founded in 1802, DuPont is a science company dedicated to solving challenging global

problems, while creating measurable and meaningful value for its customers, employees and

shareholders. Our dynamic portfolio of products, materials and services meets the ever

changing market needs of diverse industries in more than 90 countries. We un ite around a set

of core values

– safety and health, environmental stewardship, highest ethical behavior a nd

respect for people

– just as we have for two centuries. DuPont tackles some of the world’s

biggest challenges by creating real

- world solutions that help make people’s lives better, safer

and healthier.

Our businesses are guided by three strategic prio rities: Agriculture & Nutrition,

Advanced Materials, and Bio

- Based Industrials. We use our world

- class science and global

reach to help provide safe, sufficient food; ample, sustainable energy; and protection for

people and the environment.

Our businesse s provide essential, practi cal solutions for our customers

– from products

that contribute to protecting the lives of soldiers and law enforcement officers, to solar

technology harnessing the natural power of the sun, to helping farmers yield healthier cro ps.

DuPont products continue to change the world in which we live, and we’ve been doing so for

more than two centuries.

All communications regarding DuPont ’s petition should be directed to:

Noel H. Gordon

Corporate Counsel

E.I. du Pont de Nemours Company

CRP 721/1224

974 Centre Road

Wilmington, DE 19805

Noel.H.Gordon@dupont.com w ith a copy to: Marc L. Warren

Crowell & Moring LLP

1001 Pennsylvania Ave NW

Washington, DC 20004

mwarren@crowell.com

5 See, e.g

., In the Matter of the Petition of AUV, LLC , Grant of Exemption No. 12078 ( Jul

. 17 , 2015),

Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 1170 (“Exemption No. 12078”); In the Matter of the Petition of Vertical Access LLC , Grant of

Exemption No. 11943 (Jun. 30 , 2015), Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 1406 (“Exemption No. 11943 ”) ; and In the Matter of

the Petition of RTI Group , LLC, Grant of Exemption No. 11946 ( Jun

. 30 , 2015), Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 1455

(“Exemption No. 11946 ”)

.

6 See, e.g., Exemption No. 12078 at 2; Exemption No. 11943 at 2; and Exemption No. 11946 at 2.FAA Dockets

Octo ber 9 , 2015

Page 3

II. Section 333

DuPont’s petition is consistent with Congress’ s goal set forth in Section 333 of the

FMRA, which directs the Secretary of Transportation to consider whether certain UAS may

operate safely in the national airspace system ( “ NAS ” ) before completion of the rulemaking s

required under Section 332 of th at legislation

. In making this determination, the Secretary is

required to determine which types of UAS do not create a hazard to u sers of the NAS or the

public or pose a threat to national security in light of the following: (1 ) t he UAS’ size, weight,

speed, and operational capability; (2 ) o peration of the UAS in close proximity to airports and

populated areas; and (3 ) o peration of the UAS within visual line of sight of the operator. 7 To

implement Section 333, FAA has the authority to issue exemptions from its safety regulations

and minimum standards when the Administrator decides a requested exemption is in the public

interest. 8

DuPont ’ s proposed s UAS operations meet the requirements of, and qualify for

expedited approval under, Section 333. DuPont ’ s DJI Phantom 3S, Precisionhawk Lancaster,

Aibot X6, Steadidrone HX6

, AscTec Falcon 8 and AirCover QR

- 425 sUAS weigh less than 55

pound s , will operate at less than 400 feet above ground level ( “ AGL ” )

, within visual line of sight

( “ VLOS ” )

, at speeds of no more than 87 knots, and will generally comply with the same

conditions and limitations FAA established in issuing previous Section 333 g rants

. 9

Operations conducted under these safeguards will provide at least an equivalent level of

safety compared to the current regulatory structure. Moreover, DuPont ’ s operations will not

“create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public or pose a threat to

national security” due to the size of the sUAS and the restricted areas in which they will

operate. 10

III. Regulations from Which an Exemption is Requested

DuPont requests an exemption from the following regulations to the extent necessary

for DuPont to conduct the operations described in this petition :

 14 C.F.R. § § 61.23(a) and (c)

 14 C.F.R. §§ 61.101(e)(4) and (5)

 14 C

. F

. R

. § 61.113(a)

 14 C

. F

. R

. § 61. 315 (a)

 14 C.F.R. § 91. 7(a)

 14 C.F.R. § 91.119 (c)

 14 C.F.R. § 91.121

7 FMRA § 333(a).

8 See 49 U.S.C. § 106(f) and 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f).

9 See supra note 4

.

10 See, e.g., In the Matter of the Petition of Astraeus Aerial , Grant of Exemption No. 11062 (Sep t . 25,

2014), Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0352 (“Exemption No. 11062”) at 8 ( citing FMRA § 333(b)).FAA Dockets

Octo ber 9 , 2015

Page 4

 14 C

. F

. R . § 91.151(a) (1)

 14 C

. F

. R . § 91.405(a)

 14 C

. F

. R . § 91. 407(a)(1)

 14 C

. F

. R . §§ 91. 409(a) (1) and (2)

 14 C

. F

. R . §§ 91. 417(a) and (b)

The following subsections describe DuPont ’s request for an exemption from each of

these regulations and demonstrate how DuPont ’ s operations will provide for at least an

equivalent level of safety compared to the current regulatory structure that applies to manned

aircraft

.

A. 14 C.F.R. §§ 61.23(a) and (c)

– Medical certificates: Requirement and

duration

Sections 61.23(a) and (c) generally require pilots of manned aircraft to hold a FAA

medical certificate in ord er to exercise pilot privileges

. As of March 24, 2015, however, FAA

determined as a matter of policy that operators hold ing a valid driver’s license in lieu of a third

class medical certificate may conduct commercial sUAS operations under a Section 333 grant

. 11

Accordingly, DuPont requests an exemption from these provi sions to the extent necessary to

give DuPont the same relief from medical certificate requirements that FAA has afforded to

hundreds of other operators pursuant to Section 333

. 12

B. 14 C.F.R. §§ 61.101(e)(4) and (5) ; 61.113(a); and 61.315(a)

– P ilot P rivileges

and L imitations

Section 61.113(a) limits private pilots to conducting non

- commercial operations.

Similarly, Sections 61.101(e)(4) and (5) prohibit a recreational pilot from ac ting as pilot in

command of an aircraft for compensation or hire or in furtherance of a business. Section

61.315(a) authorizes a sport pilot certificate holder to act as pilot in com m and of a light

- sport

aircraft, subject to certain restrictions specified in Section 61.315(c), including a prohibition on

doing so for compensation or hire or in furtherance of a business, among other restrictions.

FAA has already determined

, however, that a private

, recreational or sport pilot certificate is

sufficient to co nduct commercial sUAS flights in a wide variety of operational environment s

. 13

Since DuPont will be conducting its sUAS operations for compensation in further ance of its

business

, DuPont requests an exemption from these provisions to the extent necessary.

DuPont notes that FAA has provide d such relief to hundreds of other Section 333 operators. 14

11 See, e.g., supra note 4; In the Matter of the Petition of EnviroMINE, Inc. , Grant of Exemption No.

11227 (Mar. 24, 2015), Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0678 at 4, 8; see also FAA, FAA Summary Grants Speed UAS

Exemptions (Apr. 9, 2015), https://www.faa.gov/news/updates/?newsId=82485

.

12 See supra note 4

.

13 Id.

14 Id

.FAA Dockets

Octo ber 9 , 2015

Page 5

Consistent with the operating conditions and limitations specified in similar Section 333

g rants, 15 DuPont will utilize only pilots holding a FAA airline transport, commercial, private,

recreational, or sport pilot certificate and at least a valid U.S. driver’s license . The sUAS will be

operated with in VLOS of the pilot

- in

- command (“ PIC ”) at all times , and all operations will utilize

a visual observer ( “ VO ” ) , who will be able to communicate verbally with the PIC at all times

during the operation. And because the area of operation will be controlled and restricted in

accordance with the safeguards contained in the Manual s and the FAA

- approved conditions

and limitations described in Section VI, infra , permitting the sUAS operations as requested

would provide for the level of safety otherwise achieved through these P art 61 provisions

. Accordingly, grant of the requested exemption, subject to the conditions and limitations

specified herein, would not adversely affect the safety of the NAS.

C. 14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a)

– Civil aircraft airworthiness

Section 91.7(a) prohibits any person from operating a civil aircraft unless it is in an

airworthy condition. FAA has stated that no exemption is required for 14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a) to the

extent that the airworthiness certificate requirements of Part 21 16 are waived or inapplicable.

Such airworthiness certificate requirements are inapplicable here, i nsofar as DuPont ’ s sUAS

provide for an equivalent level of safety when compared to manned aircraft, consistent with

the relevant language of the FMRA and the precedent FAA has established under Section 333

. 17

D. 14 C.F.R. § 91.119 (c)

– Min imum Safe Altitudes

Section 91.119 establishes safe altitudes for operation of civil aircraft. Specifically,

Section 91.119(c) provides that except when necessary for takeoff or landing, no person may

operate an aircraft below an altitude of 500 feet above the surface except over open water or

sparsely populated areas and that in such cases, the aircraft may not be operated closer than

500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle or structure. As detailed in previous Section 333 g rants

, however, FAA has determined that adherence to certain safety measures is sufficient to

warrant an exemption from Section 91.119(c) for sUAS operations

. 18 Consistent with the relief

provided to other sUAS operators under Section 333

, DuPont requests an exemption to the

extent necessary to permit DuP ont to operate below an altitude of 500 feet AGL and closer

than 500 feet to any person, vessel or structure. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved

given the size, weight and speed of DuPont ’ s sUAS, as well as the location s where they will be

operated. In addition, c onsistent with t he flexibility that FAA has already provided to other

Section 333 operators for aerial data collection

, 19 DuPont requests permission to operate a

15 See, e.g

. , Exemption Nos. 12078, 11943

, and 11946

.

16 FAA has concluded that no exemption from Part 21, Subpart H (Airworthiness Certificates) is

needed if the agency makes a finding under the FMRA that the UAS selected provides an equivalent level of safety

when compared to aircraft normally used for the sam e application. As t hese criteria are met here, no exemption is

needed. See

, e.g., Exemption No. 11062 at 13

- 14, 22. But to the extent FAA determines that there are some

characteristics of DuPont ’s sUAS that may not meet this standard , an exemption is requested.

17 See, e.g., id.

18 See, e.g., supra note 4

.

19 See id.FAA Dockets

Octo ber 9 , 2015

Page 6

minimum distance of 200 feet from any non

- participating persons so lo ng as sufficient barriers

exist to protect such persons from debris in the event of an accident. 20

E. 14 C.F.R. § 91.121

– Alti meter Settings

Section 91.121 requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude

by reference to an altimeter that is set “to the elevation of the departure airport or an

appropriate altimeter setti ng available before departure

. ” Since DuPont ’ s sUAS will not be

equipped with a typical barometric altimeter, DuPont requests relief from this provision

cons istent with the relief that FAA has already granted to other sUAS operators flying at

similarly low altitudes. 21 DuPont will operate the sUAS within VLOS at or below 400 feet AGL

and provide altitude information to the PIC via a digitally encoded telemetric data feed that

downlinks from the aircraft to a ground

- based on

- screen display. The altitude information will

be gene rated by equipment installed on the sUAS, and prior to each flight a zero altitude

initiation point will be established and confirmed for accuracy by the PIC.

F. 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a)

– Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions

Section 91.151(a) pro hibits an individual from beginning “a flight in an airplane under

VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel

to fly to the first point of intended landing, and, assuming normal cruising speed

– (1) During

the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or (2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45

minutes.” But provided certain operational parameters are established, FAA has found that

good cause exists for granting exemptions from this provision for operations in a multitude of

contexts

. 22

DuPont will be operating a less than 55

- pound sUAS in tightly

- controlled en vironment s

at speeds below 87 knots and within VLOS. Combined with the fact that DuPont will not

conduct operations unless its sUAS has enough available power for the intended mission

, and

will not continue unless there is at least five minutes of power remaining

, relief from Section

91.151(a) is warranted

, in accordance with the conditions and limitations specified in Section

VI, infr a

.

20 See In the Matter of the Petition of Team 5, LLC , Grant of Exemption No. 11158 (Jan. 29, 2015),

Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0783, at 16

- 17; In the Matter of the Petition of Picture Factory, Inc. , Grant of Exemption No.

11178 (Feb. 18, 2015), Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0794, at 23; In the Matter of the Petition of Shotover Camera Systems,

L.P. , Grant of Exemption No. 11159 (Jan. 30, 2015), Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0784, at 12; see also FAA Order 8900.1,

Vol. 3, Ch. 8, Sec. 1 (allowing certain relief from 14 C.F.R. § 119(c) in the filming context, including the 200 ft.

minimum distance standard requested herein).

21 See supra note 4

.

22 Id.FAA Dockets

Octo ber 9 , 2015

Page 7

G. 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.405(a); 91.407(a)(1); 91.409(a)(1) and (2); and 91.417(a) and

(b): Maintenance Inspections

These provisions require that an aircraft operator or owner “shall have that aircraft

inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except

as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed i n part 43

of this chapter.

. .,” and that other persons shall inspect or maintain the aircraft in compliance

with Part 43. Under Section 333

, however, FAA has established safety measures for certain

sUAS operations sufficient to warrant an exemption from these provisions. 23

DuPont will strictly adhere to the maintenance

- and inspection

- related requirements set

forth in its Manual s

, which are consistent with applicable conditions and limitations described

in Section VI, infra

.

IV. Unmanned Aircraft System

DuPont proposes to fly DJI Phantom 3S, Precisionhawk Lancaster, Aibot X6, Steadidrone

HX6, AscTec Falcon 8 and AirCover QR

- 425 sUAS. These sUAS are battery

- powered vehicles

weighing less than 55 pounds that will be flown in acc ordance with strict operating safeguards

as more fully described in Section VI, infra

, as well as those described in the Manual s

. T he sUAS

will operate at a speed of no more than 87 knots. Moreover, DuPont notes that FAA has issued

Section 333 grants enc ompassing operations with the same makes of sUAS that DuPont seeks

to operate through this petition. 24

The system’s safety features include GPS Mode, Height Mode, Manual Mode and safety

features that include Direct landing in case of link loss. These and other features will help to

ensure the safety of persons and property within and surrounding the limited operating area.

In the event the sUAS loses communications, it will have the capability to return to a pre

determined loca tion and land. In the event the sUAS loses GPS signal, the PIC will have the

capability to return the sUAS to a pre

- determined location and land. The PIC will also have the

capability to abort a flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

Comprehensive d escription s of DuPont ’s sUAS and their specifications and capabilities are

contained in the Manuals

.

As FAA has recognized, the limited weight of less than 55

- pound sUAS significantly

reduces the potential for harm to participating and nonparticipatin g individuals or property in

the event of an accident or incident, and the risk to an onboard pilot and crew is eliminated

with the use of sUAS for aerial data collection

. 25

In addition, prior to each flight, the PIC will conduct a pre

- flight inspection of the sUAS,

and maintenance will be performed to address any condition potentially affecting safe

23 Id

.

24 See supra note 3

.

25 See supra note 4

.FAA Dockets

Octo ber 9 , 2015

Page 8

operations. All maintenance and alterations will be documented in the aircra ft records. The

safety guidelines specified in the Manuals address the following key areas : ( 1 ) individual parts

( e.g., remote controller, camera, gimbal, compass, parameter settings, battery, storage and

transportation, maintenance and upkeep, etc.); (2) flight environment requirements ; ( 3 ) flight

warnings ( e.g., failsafe and return to home, low battery, vision positioning system,

transformation function, etc.) ; (4 ) pre

- flight checklist ; and (5 ) maintenance checks concerning

the battery, transformation sy stem, aircraft, motors

, propellers, gimbal and camera, and vision

positioning system.

V. Unmanned Aircraft PIC

As described above

, the PIC will be a FAA licensed airman with either an airline

transport, commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate, that holds a current FAA

airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license

. The PIC will also meet the flight

review requirements specified in Section 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or

her pilot certificate. And, p rior to conducting commercial operations under this exemption, t he

PIC will have accumulated and logged sufficient UAS

- specific flight experience

, including at least

12 hours on the DJI Phantom 3S, Precisionhawk Lancaster, Aibot X6, Steadidrone HX6, AscTec

Falcon 8 and AirCover QR

- 425 sUAS before being designated to operate them commercially.

In addition, the PIC and the VO will have successfully com pleted a qualification process

and a sUAS flight demonstration administered by a DuPont

- approved and

- qualified pilot.

VI. Operation of the Unmanned Aircraft

DuPont will conduct all flights under the requested exemption subject to the following

conditions and limitations, and as further detailed in the Manual s : 26

A. The sUAS will weigh less than 55 pounds (25 kilograms ), including payload

.

B. The s UA S will not be flown at a ground speed exceeding 87 knots ( i.e. 100 miles per

hour)

.

C. Flights will be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet AGL. All altitudes

reported to ATC will be in feet AGL

.

D. The s UA S will be operated within VLOS of the PIC and/or VO at all times.

E. All operations will utilize a VO , who may be used to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long

as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The VO and PIC will be able to

communicate verbally at all times.

26 The conditions and limitations detailed in this section are consistent with those set forth in the

previous FAA Section 333 grants for operations similar to those DuPont seeks to conduct through this petition

. See, e.g

., supra note 5

.FAA Dockets

Octo ber 9 , 2015

Page 9

F. The grant of exemption and Manual s will be accessible during DuPont ’ s sUAS operations

and made available to FAA upon r equest. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions

and limitations in the grant of exemption and the procedures outlined in the Manual s

, the conditions and limitations in the exemption take precedence and will be followed.

G. Prior to each operation, t he PIC will inspect the s UAS to ensure it is in a condition for

safe flight. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the

s UAS, it will not be operated until the necessary maintenance has been performed and

the s UAS is foun d to be in a condition for safe flight. The ground control station will also

be included in the preflight inspection. All maintenance and alterations will be

documented in the sUAS records.

H. Any s UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect its operation or

flight characteristics ( e.g

. , replacement of a flight critical component ) will undergo a

functional test flight prior to resumption of operations

. The PIC who conducts the

func tional test flight will make an entry in the s UAS aircraft records of the flight.

I. DuPont will follow the manufacturer’s s UAS aircraft/component, maintenance,

overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements.

J. The PIC will possess either an airline transport, commercial, private, recreational, or

sport pilot certificate, and a current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S.

driver’s license. The PIC will undergo at least 12 hours of training to ensure that he or

she can follow these procedures. The PIC will also meet the flight review requirements

specified in Section 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot

certificate.

K. Prior to conducting commercial opera tions under this exemption:

1. T he PIC will have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with Section

61.51(b)

, a minimum of 12 hours of flying DJI Phantom 3S, Precisionhawk

Lancaster, Aibot X6, Steadidrone HX6, the AscTec Falcon 8 and /or AirCover QR

425 sUAS bef ore being designated to operate such sUAS for commercial aerial

data collection

. During training, proficiency, and experience

- building flights, the

PIC will operate the s UA S with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in

accordance with Section 91.119.

2. A flight demonstration, administered by a DuPont

- approved and

- qualified pilot

, will be successfully completed and documented. This documentation will be

available for review upon request by FAA

.

L. The s UA S will be operated at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating persons, vessels,

vehicles, or structures unless both of the following conditions are met :FAA Dockets

Octo ber 9 , 2015

Page 10

1. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating

persons in the event of an accident; and

2. The own er/controller of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted

permission for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety

assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that

it does not present an undue haz ard.

M. In the event the s UAS loses communications

, it will have the capability to return to a

pre

- determined location and land . In the event the sUAS loses GPS signal, the PIC will

have the capability to return to a pre

- determined location and land.

N. The PIC will have the capability to abort a flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or

emergencies.

O. The sUAS will not be operated unless it has enough available power to conduct the

intended operation and to operate after that for at least five minutes, or with the

reserve power recommended by the manufacturer, whichever is greater.

P. DuPont will obtain an Air Traffic Organization ( “ ATO ” ) issued Certificate of Waiver or

Authorization ( “ COA ” ) prior to cond ucting any operations above 200 f ee t AGL under the

exemption. 27

Q. All sUAS operated in accordance with this exemption will be identified by serial number,

registered in accordance with 14 C

. F

. R

. P art 47, and have identification (N

- Number)

markings in accordance with 14 C

. F

. R

. P art 45, Subpart C. Markings will be as large as

practicable.

R. DuPont will follow the procedures established in the Manuals for documenting and

maintaining records of the s UAS maintenance, preventative maintenance, alterations,

s tatus of replacement/overhaul component parts, and the total time in service of the

s UAS

.

S. Each s UAS operated under this exemption will comply with all manufacturer Safety

Bulletins.

27 Pursuant to its “blanket” COA, FAA will automatically grant a COA for flights at or below 200 feet

to any UAS operator with a Section 333 exemption for aircraft that weigh less than 55 pounds, operate during

daytime VFR conditions, operate within VLOS, and stay certain prescribed distances away from airports or

heliports. See FAA, FAA Streamlines UAS COAs for Section 333 (rev. Mar. 24, 2015),

https://www.faa.gov/news/updates/?newsId=82245 . Thi s blanket COA allows flights anywhere in the country

except restricted airspace and certain other prohibited areas

, and FAA automatically issues it at the time the

exemption is approved. Id

. T o the extent DuPont plans to operate its sUAS above 200 ft. AGL, it will apply for a

COA authorizing it to do so.FAA Dockets

Octo ber 9 , 2015

Page 11

T. The preflight inspection section described in the Manual s will accoun t for all

discrepancies ( i.e

. , inoperable components, items, or equipment )

.

U. DuPont ’ s use of radio frequency spectrum for operation and control of the s UA S will

comply with the Federal Communications Commission ( “ FCC ” ) or other appropriate

government oversight agency requirements.

V. The documents required under Sections 91.9 and 91.203 will be available to the PIC at

the ground control station of the s UAS any time the aircraft are operating. These

documents will be made available to FAA or any law enforcement official upon request.

W. The s UA S will remain clear and yield the right of way to all other manned operations and

activities at all times (including, but not limited to, ultralight vehicles, parachute

activities, parasailing activities, hang gli ders, etc.).

X. s UAS operations will not be conducted during night, as defined in Section 1.1. All

operations will be conducted under visual meteorological conditions ( “ VMC ” ). Flights

under special visual flight rules ( “ SVFR ” ) are not authorized.

Y. The s UAS will not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

Z. The s UA S will not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than three statute miles from the PIC.

AA. The s UA S will not be operate d within five nautical miles of an airport reference point

( “ ARP ” ) as denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facility Directory ( “ AFD ” ) or for airports

not denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbol as denoted on the current

FAA

- published aeronautical chart

, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s

management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA issued to DuPont

. The letter

of agreement with the airport management will be made available to FAA and any law

enforcement official upon request.

BB. Any incident, accident, or flig ht operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical

boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA will be reported to

FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS

- 80) within 24 hours and the National Transportation

Safety Board ( “ NTSB ” ) , as a pplicable

.

VII. Public Interest

Authorizing DuPont to use sUAS for aerial data collection under the conditions specified

herein w ill bring immediate and significant safety improvement in various commercial

industries

. In particular

, DuPont plans to use its sUAS for :

 Precision agriculture and field imaging ;

 Stack and infrastructure inspection; andFAA Dockets

October 9, 2015

Page 12

• Wildlife monitoring/control.

Among other benefits, these sUAS uses will allow large-scale growers to improve yield

and reduce input costs daily; reduce risks to workers conducting remote infrastructure

inspections at our manufacturing sites who would otherwise have to access such areas

manually; and will aid in the control of birds that interrupt operations and endanger themselves

and workers by perching in smoke stacks.

DuPont's sUAS will be used for aerial data collection in a manner that provides at least

an equivalent level of safety compared to the current regulatory structure that applies to

manned aircraft. 28 They will also provide for safer and more efficient means of performing

certain commercial tasks that are currently performed by other methods.

VIII. Conclusion

Given the small size of DuPont's sUAS and the restricted, controlled environment within

which they will operate, DuPont's proposed sUAS operations fall squarely within the type of

operations that Congress intended be authorized pursuant to Section 333. They are also similar

in all material respects to those that FAA has already authorized under Section 333, including

several covering nearly identical types of operations- and should be approved on an expedited

basis. Based on the clear direction from Congress, the authority contained in the Federal

Aviation Act, as amended; the well -estab lished equivalent level of safety present in DuPont's

proposed operations; the significant public benefits associated with using sUAS for aerial data

collection; and the precedent that FAA has established through more than 1,800 Section 333

grants, grant of DuPont's petition is in the public interest. Accordingly, DuPont respectfully

requests that FAA grant it an exemption without delay.

Respectfully submitted,



# C2t.w **~~**

Counsel for

E.l. du Pont de Nemours and Company

28 See Exemption No

. 11062 at 22.

Crowell a: Moring LLP • www.crowell.com • Washington, DC • New York • San Francisco • Los Angeles • Orange County • Anchorage • London • Brussels

### Appendix A

The DuPont subsidiary companies seeking Section 333 exemption authority to conduct

the sUAS operations described in this petition consist of the following:

 Coastal Training Technologies Corp.

 DuPont Acquisition, LLC

 DuPont Asia Pacific Limited

 DuPont Capital Management Corporation

 DuPont Chemical and Energy Operations, Inc.

 DuPont Energy Company, LLC

 DuPont Operations Worldwide, Inc.

 DuPont Operations, Inc.

 DuPont Textiles & Interiors Delaware, Inc.

 EKC Technology, Inc.

 MECS Inc.

 Pioneer Hi

- Bred International, Inc.

 Solae L.L.C.