alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 680.118 Other Federal requirements. All applicable Federal statutory and regulatory requirements apply to the EV charger projects. These requirements include, but are not limited to: ( a ) All statutory and regulatory requirements that are applicable to funds apportioned under chapter 1 of Title 23, United States Code, and the requirements of 2 CFR part 200 apply. This includes the applicable requirements of 23, United States Code, and Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, such as the applicable Buy America requirements at 23 U.S.C. 313 and Build America, Buy America Act (Pub. L. No 117-58, div. G sections 70901-70927).
( b ) As provided at 23 U.S.C. 109(s)(2), projects to install EV chargers are treated as if the project is located on a Federal-aid highway. As a project located on a Federal-aid highway, 23 U.S.C. 113 applies and Davis Bacon Federal wage rate requirements included at subchapter IV of chapter 31 of Title 40, U.S.C., must be paid for any project funded with NEVI Formula Program funds.
( c ) The American with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), and implementing regulations, apply to EV charging stations by prohibiting discrimination on the basis of disability by public and private entities. EV charging stations must comply with applicable accessibility standards adopted by the Department of Transportation into its ADA regulations (49 CFR part 37) in 2006, and adopted by the Department of Justice into its ADA regulations (28 CFR parts 35 and 36) in 2010.
( d ) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and implementing regulations, apply to this program to ensure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
( e ) All applicable requirements of Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (Fair Housing Act), and implementing regulations, apply to this program.
( f ) The Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program does not apply to the NEVI Formula Funds; however, the DBE program may apply to other programs apportioned under chapter 1 of Title 23, United States Code.
( g ) The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act, and implementing regulations, apply to this program by establishing minimum standards for federally funded programs and projects that involve the acquisition of real property (real estate) or the displacement or relocation of persons from their homes, businesses, or farms.
( h ) The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), the Council on Environmental Quality's NEPA implementing regulations, and applicable agency NEPA procedures apply to this program by establishing procedural requirements to ensure that Federal agencies consider the consequences of their proposed actions on the human environment and inform the public about their decision making for major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
#### National Gypsum Company, Respondent, v. Candee, Smith & Howland Company, Appellant.

No opinion. Present ■—• Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
Case 17-30663-KRH Doc 8 Filed 02/13/17 Entered 02/13/17 09:13:08 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,076
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     21,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,976
<PP&E>                                           3,133
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,599
<BONDS>                                          7,063
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,109
<SALES>                                          1,423
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,086
<CGS>                                           17,498
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,498
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   618
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    970
<INCOME-TAX>                                       582
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                388
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       388
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  each of the  undersigned  officers  of  Carbonics
Capital  Corporation (the "Company"),  certifies
that:

1.   The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company  for the  Quarter  ended
     March 31, 2008 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
     Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




                                     /S/      KEVIN KREISLER
                                     -------------------------------------
Dated: May 20, 2008                           KEVIN KREISLER
                                              Chief Executive Officer

                                     /S/      JACQUELINE FLYNN
                                     -------------------------------------
Dated: May 20, 2008                           JACQUELINE FLYNN
                                              Chief Financial Officer

This  certification  is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,
subject  to the  knowledge  standard  contained  therein,  and not for any other
purpose.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.4


                                                JOHN F. DUGGAN, ESQUIRE
                                                DIRECTOR OF LEGAL AFFAIRS
                                                DIRECT DIAL:  (717) 796-6143


VIA FACSIMILE AND FEDERAL EXPRESS

                                                December 31, 1999
Rayburn W. Green
Ball & Mourton, Ltd., PLLC
E.J. Ball Plaza
112 W. Center, Suite 700
Fayetteville, Arkansas  72702

      Re:   Acquisition of Balanced Care Corporation's Missouri Assets or
            Lease Rights and Operations - Asset Purchase Agreement - Third
            Amendment

Dear Ray:

      As we discussed today, the purpose of this letter is to memorialize in
writing our understanding of the following amendment to the Asset Purchase
Agreement (the "Agreement"):

      Balanced Care Corporation, for itself and for each of its Subsidiaries
("Seller") and Christian Health Care of Missouri, Inc. ("Buyer") hereby agree
that Section 5.1(ii) is changed to read as follows:  "(ii) January 7, 2000
(the "Closing")."

            If this amendment meets with your approval, please have the Seller
acknowledge below and return this letter amendment to Robin Barber. If you have
any questions, please let me know. Thank you for your consideration.


Acknowledged, Agreed to and Accepted:

SELLER:                                         PURCHASER:
BALANCED CARE CORPORATION,                      CHRISTIAN HEALTH CARE OF
for itself and for each of its Subsidiaries     MISSOURI, INC.


By:/s/Brad E. Hollinger                         By:/s/Allen D. Kilgore
Name: Brad E. Hollinger                            Allen D. Kilgore
Title: Chairman & CEO                              President
### §460r–4. Administration, protection, and development of area

The administration, protection, and development of the recreation area shall be by the Secretary of Agriculture in accordance with the laws, rules, and regulations applicable to national forests, in such manner as in his judgment will best provide for (1) public outdoor recreation benefits; (2) conservation of scenic, scientific, historic, and other values contributing to public enjoyment; and (3) such management, utilization, and disposal of natural resources as in his judgment will promote, or is compatible with, and does not significantly impair the purposes for which the recreation area is established.

(Pub. L. 89–438, §5, May 31, 1966, 80 Stat. 191.)
#### § 215.7 Instructions from the Administrator required in certain cases.

In the absence of appropriate instructions from the Administrator of the Bureau of Security and Consular Affairs, departure-control officers shall not exercise the authority conferred by § 215.2 in the case of any alien who seeks to depart from the United States in the status of a nonimmigrant under section 101(a)(15) (A) or (G) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, or in the status of a nonimmigrant under section 11(3), 11(4), or 11(5) of the Agreement between the United Nations and the United States of America regarding the Headquarters of the United Nations (61 Stat. 756): *Provided,* That in cases of extreme urgency, where the national security so requires, a departure-control officer may preliminarily exercise the authority conferred by § 215.2 pending the outcome of consultation with the Administrator, which shall be undertaken immediately. In all cases arising under this section, the decision of the Administrator shall be controlling: *Provided,* That any decision to prevent the departure of an alien shall be based upon a hearing and record as prescribed in this part.
### §581k. Authorization of appropriations for reforestation and revegetation

For the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this joint resolution on national-forest lands and other lands under the administration or control of the Forest Service of the Department of Agriculture, including the acquisition of land or interests therein for nurseries, there is authorized to be appropriated to remain available until December 31 of the ensuing fiscal year, $3,000,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1951; $5,000,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1952; $7,000,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1953; $8,000,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1954; $10,000,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1955; a like amount for each subsequent year through the fiscal year ending June 30, 1965, and thereafter such amounts as may be needed for reforestation; and $1,500,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1951; $1,750,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1952; $2,000,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1953; $2,500,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1954; $3,000,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1955; a like amount for each subsequent year through the fiscal year ending June 30, 1965, and thereafter such amounts as may be needed for range revegetation.

(Oct. 11, 1949, ch. 674, §2, 63 Stat. 763.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This joint resolution, referred to in text, means Joint Res. 53, Oct. 11, 1949, ch. 674, 63 Stat. 762, which is classified to this section and section 581j of this title.
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 

In Re: 

Linda F. Jones Case # 17-12166-BFK 

REPORT OF DEPOSIT OF UNCLAIMED FUNDS 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3011 and 11 U.S.C. 347, the trustee 

herein submits a check, or checks, payable to the “Clerk, United States Bankruptcy Court” 

representing unclaimed funds to be deposited by the Clerk of the Court into the Treasury 

of the United States. Said funds are subject to withdrawal as provided by 28 U.S.C. 2042 

and shall not escheat under any state law. Unclaimed funds represent the dividend(s) due 

and payable to the entity identified as the original payee on the face of the enclosed 

check(s). 

PAYEE 

LINDA F. JONES 

16841 Winston Lane 

Woodbridge, VA 22191 

AMOUNT 

$2,187.90 

Dated: February 28, 2018 __/s/Thomas P. Gorman ___________ 

Thomas P. Gorman 

300 North Washington Street, Ste. 400 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

(703) 836-2226 

VSB#26421 

Case 17-12166-BFK Doc 29 Filed 02/28/18 Entered 02/28/18 11:58:27 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
**Important legal notice**

*|*

# 32005M3519

**Commission Decision of 28/01/2005 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.3519 - ELECTRA /THYSSENKRUPP FAHRZEUGGUS) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the English text is authentic)****

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3519 — Electra/ThyssenKrupp Fahrzeuggus)

(2005/C 42/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 28 January 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

-  from the Europa competition web site (http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/cases/ ). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

-  in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3519. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex)

--------------------------------------------------
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LINDA RESTREPO AND

CARLOS RESTREPO D/B/A

COLLECTIVELY RDI GLOBAL

SERVICES AND R&D

INTERNATIONAL,

Appellant s

,

v.

ALLIANCE RIGGERS &

CONSTRUCTORS, LTD.,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 16

- 00114

- CV

Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 5

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2012

- DCV

- 04523 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Finding that there is no appealable order, we dismiss the

appeal for want of jurisdiction

.

Appellants ’ notice of appeal indicates th at they are appealing from a writ of execution

issued by the El Paso County District Clerk in cause number 2012

- DCV

- 04523

. It is well settled

that appellate courts have jurisdiction over final judgm ents and interlocutory orders made

appealable by statute. Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corporation , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001);

T EX .C IV .P RAC .&R EM .C ODE A NN . § 51.014 (West 2015)(authorizing appeals from certain

interlocutory orders). A separate appeal is pendin g from the final judgment entered by the trial- 2

-

court in the same cause number (our cause number 08

- 15

- 00348

- CV). It is well established that

a writ of execution and orders incident to such a writ are not appealable orders. Schultz v. Fifth

Judicial District Court of Appeals , 810 S.W.2d 738, 740 (Tex. 1991); Qualia v. Qualia , 37

S.W.3d 128, 129 (Tex.App.

-- San Antonio 2001, no pet.). On June 6, 2016, we gave Appellants

notice of our intent to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. They have not filed any

response. Finding there is no appealable order, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Ju ly 6, 2016

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

Hughes, J., not participating
# Official Journal L 290/2011

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2011.290.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 290 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 549 November 2011 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2011.290.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 290

English edition

Legislation

Volume 549 November 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1132/2011 of 8 November 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 798/2008 as regards transit of consignments of eggs and egg products from Belarus through Lithuania to the Russian territory of Kaliningrad (1) | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1133/2011 of 8 November 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 4 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1132/2011 of 8 November 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 798/2008 as regards transit of consignments of eggs and egg products from Belarus through Lithuania to the Russian territory of Kaliningrad (1)

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1133/2011 of 8 November 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

4

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1006/2011 of 27 September 2011 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 282, 28.10.2011) | 6 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1006/2011 of 27 September 2011 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 282, 28.10.2011)

(OJ L 282, 28.10.2011)

6

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Case 16-34012-KLP Doc 16 Filed 09/12/16 Entered 09/12/16 22:32:21 Desc MainDocument Page 1 of 3Case 16-34012-KLP Doc 16 Filed 09/12/16 Entered 09/12/16 22:32:21 Desc MainDocument Page 2 of 3Case 16-34012-KLP Doc 16 Filed 09/12/16 Entered 09/12/16 22:32:21 Desc MainDocument Page 3 of 3
NEI32636 Formaldehyde REL 22 20 Examined results for maximum off-site impact (Figure 1) 2 See Appendix 7 for figures depicting off-site impacts. Facility NEI ID 1 Facilities with a HEM-3 screening acute value greater than 1 were refined. Table 4a – Maximum Predicted Acute Risks Greater than 1 (Refined Approach) Refined Modeling Approach 2 Pollutant Criteria HEM-3 (Screening) Refined Results 1 Mineral Wool Production

1 of 1
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 02134**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** 

### 02134\02134_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 02134\02134_Checklist_110510_version34.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 02134\02134_Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 

### 02134\02134_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02134\02134_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02134\02134_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02134\02314_Email Correspondence.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response x 

### 02134\Supporting Documentation\02134_powersmith aerial photo10.28-10.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 02134\Supporting Documentation\02134_powersmith epa transmit ltr 10.28-10.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02134\Supporting Documentation\02134_powersmith water balance10.28-10.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02134\Supporting Documentation\PowerSmith Site Map_99123-112_Stormwater10.28-10.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
§ 236.12 Eligibility. ( a ) *General.* An alien who is not a lawful permanent resident is eligible to apply for benefits under the Family Unity Program if he or she establishes: ( 1 ) That he or she entered the United States before May 5, 1988 (in the case of a relationship to a legalized alien described in subsection (b)(2)(B) or (b)(2)(C) of section 301 of IMMACT 90), or as of December 1, 1988 (in the case of a relationship to a legalized alien described in subsection (b)(2)(A) of section 301 of IMMACT 90), and has been continuously residing in the United States since that date; and
( 2 ) That as of May 5, 1988, (in the case of a relationship to a legalized alien described in subsection (b)(2)(B) or (b)(2) (C) of section 301 of IMMACT 90) or as of December 1, 1988, (in the case of a relationship to a legalized alien described in subsection (b)(2) (A) of section 301 of IMMACT 90), he or she was the spouse or unmarried child of a legalized alien, and that he or she has been eligible continuously since that time for family-sponsored immigrant status under section 203(a) (1), (2), or
( 3 ) or as an immediate relative under section 201 (b)(2) of the Act based on the same relationship.
( b ) *Legalization application pending as of May 5, 1988 or December 1, 1988.* An alien whose legalization application was filed on or before May 5, 1988 (in the case of a relationship to a legalized alien described in subsection (b)(2)(B) or (b)(2)(C) of section 301 of IMMACT 90), or as of December 1, 1988 (in the case of a relationship to a legalized alien described in subsection (b)(2)(A) of section 301 of IMMACT 90), but not approved until after that date will be treated as having been a legalized alien as of May 5, 1988 (in the case of a relationship to a legalized alien described in subsection (b)(2)(B) or (b)(2)(C) of section 301 of IMMACT 90), or as of December 1, 1988 (in the case of a relationship to a legalized alien described in subsection (b)(2)(A) of section 301 of IMMACT 90), for purposes of the Family Unity Program.
[62 FR 10360, Mar. 6, 1997, as amended at 65 FR 43679, July 14, 2000]