alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                               HAWAIIAN AIRLINES, INC.

                                 ADDENDUM TO WARRANT
                            FOR THE PURCHASE OF SHARES OF
                                     COMMON STOCK

     Effective on August 13, 1996, the Warrant evidenced by Warrant Certificate
No. 12, which prior thereto entitled the holder thereof to purchase 948,973
shares of the common stock, par value $.01 per share, of Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.
(the "Common Stocks) at an exercise price of $1.10 per share, was adjusted
pursuant to Sections 3 and 4 thereof, and pursuant to such adjustment (i)
Warrant Certificate No. 23 was issued to evidence new Warrants to purchase
25,696 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $1.071 per share and (ii)
the exercise price of the Warrant evidenced by Warrant Certificate No. 12 was
reduced to $1.071.  This Addendum is issued to evidence the reduction in the
exercise price of the Warrant evidenced by Warrant Certificate No. 12.

     IN WITNESS THEREOF, Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. has caused this Addendum to be
duly signed by its President or one of its Vice Presidents and duly attested by
its Secretary or its Assistant Secretary.


                                             HAWAIIAN AIRLINES, INC.

Dated as of August 13, 1996                  By
                                               ----------------------------
                                             Name:  Bruce R. Nobles
                                             Title: President and Chief
                                                    Executive Officer



ATTEST:


-----------------------------
Name:  Rae A. Capps
Title: Vice President, General Counsel
       And Corporate Secretary
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 88969 / May 28, 2020

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-19793

In the Matter of

Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

By order dated February 22, 2019, the Commission issued the “Omnibus Order 

Directing the Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that 

Establish Distribution Funds” (“Omnibus Order”),1 authorizing the Secretary to issue 

orders for calendar years 2019-2021 appointing, upon request by the Commission staff, 

Miller Kaplan Arase LLP (“Miller Kaplan”), a certified public accounting firm, with one 

of their offices located in San Fransciso, California, as tax administrator (“Tax 

Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund may incur 

tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department of 

the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On May 27, 2020, the Commission staff requested, pursuant to the Omnibus 

Order, the appointment of Miller Kaplan as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the 

above-referenced proceeding. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Miller Kaplan, pursuant to and in accordance 

with the Omnibus Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the abovereferenced proceeding. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 85174 (Feb. 22, 2019).
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 23.8

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement of Hercules Incorporated on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-37279,
33-21668, 33-21667, 33-47664, 33-51178, 33-52621, 33-66136, 33-62314, 33-65352,
333-38795, 333-38797 and 333-68863) and on Form S-3 (Registration Nos. 333-63423
and 333-29225) of our report dated November 19, 2002, relating to our audits of
the consolidated financial statements of FiberVisions A/S and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000 and for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2001, which report is included in this Form 10-K/A.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
Skive, Denmark
December 11, 2002
#### Beaunit Mills, Inc., et al., Respondents, v. Marcus Rottenberg et al., Individually and as Copartners under the Name of Carl Gutmann *&*Company and under the Name of Rightfit Company, Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
### §480. Civil and criminal jurisdiction

The jurisdiction, both civil and criminal, over persons within national forests shall not be affected or changed by reason of their existence, except so far as the punishment of offenses against the United States therein is concerned; the intent and meaning of this provision being that the State wherein any such national forest is situated shall not, by reason of the establishment thereof, lose its jurisdiction, nor the inhabitants thereof their rights and privileges as citizens, or be absolved from their duties as citizens of the State.

(June 4, 1897, ch. 2, §1, 30 Stat. 36; Mar. 1, 1911, ch. 186, §12, 36 Stat. 963.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Provisions substantially in the language of this section are contained in section 12 of act Mar. 1, 1911, applicable to national forest lands acquired on the recommendation of the National Forest Reservation Commission under sections 500, 515 to 519, 521, 552 and 563 of this title.

"National forests" and "national forest" substituted in text for "forest reservations" and "reservation", respectively, on authority of act Mar. 4, 1907, ch. 2907, 34 Stat. 1269, which provided that forest reserves shall hereafter be known as national forests.
**Exhibit 10.36**

 

**GeneralTerms of Employment between Hercules Incorporated and Certain ExecutiveOfficers.**

 

Thefollowing information summarizes certain terms of employment under whichHercules Executives – namely Craig A. Rogerson, Fred G. Aanonsen, John Y. Televantos,Israel J. Floyd, Allen A. Spizzo, Paul C. Raymond and Richard G. Dahlen – areemployed.

 

•      Basisof Employment - Employment at Will (except as modified by Change in ControlAgreements in effect as listed herein)

 

Eligible fornon-guaranteed base salary, annual bonus and long term incentive awards

 

•      BaseSalaries - Reviewed for adjustment upon change in job/position or each March 1.  Increases based on performance and pay leveland are not guaranteed.

 

•      VariableAnnual Incentive – performance based, no guaranteed payout

 

•      LongTerm Incentive Awards – Grants based on position level.  No guaranteed grant or award value.

 

•      Benefits– Participate in plans applicable to all salaried employees in U.S. on samebasis and same benefit structure as all salaried employees.

 

•      Others– Mr. Rogerson is provided on a periodic basis a driver to transport himto and from home and/or meetings depending on business reasons. Upon joiningHercules, Messrs. Aanonsen, Televantos, and Raymond received employment offerletters which are set forth in the Exhibits.

 

----
### §410ff–5. Designation of wilderness areas

Within three complete fiscal years from March 5, 1980, the Secretary shall review the area within the park and shall report to the President, in accordance with section 1132(c) and (d) of this title, his recommendations as to the suitability or nonsuitability of any area within the park for designation as wilderness. Any designation of any such areas as wilderness shall be accomplished in accordance with section 1132(c) and (d) of this title.

(Pub. L. 96–199, title II, §206, Mar. 5, 1980, 94 Stat. 77.)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIESANDEXCHANGECOMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 79511 / December 8, 2016 

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-16829

ORDER APPOINTING TAX

ADMINISTRATOR

By order dated February 2, 2016, the Commission issued the Omnibus Order Directing 

the Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that Establish Distribution 

Funds (“Omnibus Order”), Exchange Act Rel. No. 77016, authorizing the Secretary of the 

Commission to issue orders during calendar years 2016-2018 appointing, upon request by the 

Commission staff, Damasco & Associates LLP (“Damasco”), a certified public accounting firm 

located in Half Moon Bay, as tax administrator (“Tax Administrator”) in administrative 

proceedings where the distribution fund may incur tax-related obligations as a Qualified 

Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department of the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On December 8, 2016, the Commission staff requested, pursuant to the Omnibus Order, 

the appointment of Damasco as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced 

proceeding.

In the Matter of

WILLIAM B. FRETZ, JR., JOHN P. 

FREEMAN, COVENANT CAPITAL 

MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, L.P., AND 

COVENANT PARTNERS, L.P.,

Respondents.
2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Damasco, pursuant to and in accordance with the 

Omnibus Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced 

proceeding. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority. 

Brent J. Fields

Secretary
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 79227 / November 3, 2016

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-16846

In the Matter of 

UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES

INCORPORATED OF PUERTO RICO

Respondent. 

ORDER APPOINTING FUND PLAN 

ADMINISTRATOR AND SETTING 

ADMINISTRATOR BOND 

AMOUNT

On September 29, 2015, in two related settled administrative proceedings the 

Commission issued separate orders, against UBS Financial Services Incorporated of Puerto Rico 

(“UBSPR”)1and Ramiro L. Colon, III (“Colon”)2finding that they violated the federal securities 

laws.

The Commission ordered UBSPR to pay a total of $15,000,000, comprised of 

$1,188,149.41 in disgorgement, $174,196.97 in prejudgment interest, and a civil money penalty 

of $13,637,653.62, and created a Fair Fund for distribution to harmed investors, pursuant to 

Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended. Colon was ordered to pay a 

$25,000 civil money penalty. UBSPR and Colon paid the sums ordered by the Commission, 

which total $15,025,000 in the Fair Fund.

 

1

 See Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 

1934, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions, Exchange Act Rel. No. 76013 (Sept. 29, 2016).

2

 See Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 

1934, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions, Exchange Act Rel. No. 76014 (Sept. 29, 2016).
2

The Division of Enforcement now seeks the appointment of Rust Consulting, Inc. 

(“Rust”) as the fund plan administrator and requests that the administrator’s bond be set at 

$15,025,000. Rust is included in the Commission’s approved pool of administrators.

Accordingly, pursuant to Rules 1105(a) and 1105(c) of the Commission’ Rules on Fair 

Fund and Disgorgement Plan (“Rules”),

3

it is hereby ORDERED that Rust is appointed as fund 

plan administrator and shall obtain a bond in accordance with Rule 1105(c) in the amount of 

$15,025,000.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.4

 

Brent J. Fields

Secretary 

 

3

 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.1105(a) and 201.1105(c).

4

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(17).
§ 204.303 Determination of habitual residence. ( a ) *U.S. Citizens.* For purposes of this subpart, a U.S. citizen who is seeking to have an alien classified as the U.S. citizen's child under section 101(b)(1)(G) of the Act is deemed to be habitually resident in the United States if the individual: ( 1 ) Has his or her domicile in the United States, even if he or she is living temporarily abroad; or
( 2 ) Is not domiciled in the United States but establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that: ( i ) The citizen will have established a domicile in the United States on or before the date of the child's admission to the United States for permanent residence as a Convention adoptee; or
( ii ) The citizen indicates on the Form I-800 that the citizen intends to bring the child to the United States after adopting the child abroad, and before the child's 18th birthday, at which time the child will be eligible for, and will apply for, naturalization under section 322 of the Act and 8 CFR part 322. This option is not available if the child will be adopted in the United States.
( b ) *Convention adoptees.* A child whose classification is sought as a Convention adoptee is, generally, deemed for purposes of this subpart C to be habitually resident in the country of the child's citizenship. If the child's actual residence is outside the country of the child's citizenship, the child will be deemed habitually resident in that other country, rather than in the country of citizenship, if the Central Authority (or another competent authority of the country in which the child has his or her actual residence) has determined that the child's status in that country is sufficiently stable for that country properly to exercise jurisdiction over the child's adoption or custody. This determination must be made by the Central Authority itself, or by another competent authority of the country of the child's habitual residence, but may not be made by a nongovernmental individual or entity authorized by delegation to perform Central Authority functions. The child will not be considered to be habitually resident in any country to which the child travels temporarily, or to which he or she travels either as a prelude to, or in conjunction with, his or her adoption and/or immigration to the United States.
### §450oo–4. Employment preferences

The Secretary of the Interior shall, insofar as practicable, give first preference to employment of recognized members of the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe in the performance of any construction, maintenance, or any other service within the monument for which they are qualified.

(Pub. L. 85–910, §5, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1753.)
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

20 July 2006

(2006/C 169/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
#### Pamela J. ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patricia HUFFMAN, Warden, Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-7970.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 24, 2002.

Decided May 15, 2002.

Pamela J. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Pamela J. Anderson, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See Anderson v. Huffman,*No. CA-01-732-7 (W.D.Va. Nov. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
### §410cc–12. Consultations, cooperation, and conduct of activities by Federal entities; issuance of licenses or permits by Federal entities

#### (a) Activities directly affecting park

Any Federal entity conducting or supporting activities directly affecting the park or preservation district shall—

(1) consult with, cooperate with, and to the maximum extent practicable, coordinate its activities with the Secretary and with the Commission; and

(2) conduct or support such activities in a manner which (A) to the maximum extent practicable is consistent with the standards and criteria established pursuant to section 410cc–32(e) of this title, and (B) will not have an adverse effect on the resources of the park or preservation district.

#### (b) Determination as to proposed activities

No Federal entity may issue any license or permit to any person to conduct an activity within the park or preservation district unless such entity determines that the proposed activity will be conducted in a manner consistent with the standards and criteria established pursuant to section 410cc–32(e) of this title and will not have an adverse effect on the resources of the park or preservation district.

(Pub. L. 95–290, title I, §102, June 5, 1978, 92 Stat. 291.)
Case 16-72015-FJS Doc 10 Filed 06/13/16 Entered 06/13/16 12:00:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 11
Case 16-72015-FJS Doc 10 Filed 06/13/16 Entered 06/13/16 12:00:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 11
Case 16-72015-FJS Doc 10 Filed 06/13/16 Entered 06/13/16 12:00:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 3 of 11
Case 16-72015-FJS Doc 10 Filed 06/13/16 Entered 06/13/16 12:00:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 4 of 11
Case 16-72015-FJS Doc 10 Filed 06/13/16 Entered 06/13/16 12:00:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 5 of 11
Case 16-72015-FJS Doc 10 Filed 06/13/16 Entered 06/13/16 12:00:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 6 of 11
Case 16-72015-FJS Doc 10 Filed 06/13/16 Entered 06/13/16 12:00:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 7 of 11
Case 16-72015-FJS Doc 10 Filed 06/13/16 Entered 06/13/16 12:00:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 8 of 11
Case 16-72015-FJS Doc 10 Filed 06/13/16 Entered 06/13/16 12:00:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 9 of 11
Case 16-72015-FJS Doc 10 Filed 06/13/16 Entered 06/13/16 12:00:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 10 of 11
Case 16-72015-FJS Doc 10 Filed 06/13/16 Entered 06/13/16 12:00:23 Desc Main

 Document Page 11 of 11
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4716 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4716

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a safe harbor for 
high deductible health plans without a deductible for certain inhalers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 17, 2019

     Mr. Cox of California (for himself and Ms. Sewell of Alabama) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a safe harbor for 
high deductible health plans without a deductible for certain inhalers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Inhaler Coverage and Access Now 
Act'' or as the ``I CAN Act''.

SEC. 2. SAFE HARBOR FOR HIGH DEDUCTIBLE HEALTH PLANS WITHOUT DEDUCTIBLE 
              FOR CERTAIN INHALERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 223(c)(2)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``for preventive care'' and inserting ``for 
        one or more of the following:
                            ``(i) Preventive care'', and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new clause:
                            ``(ii) Inhalers for treatment of any 
                        chronic lung disease (and any medicine or drug 
                        which is delivered through such inhaler for 
                        treatment of such disease).''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The heading for section 223(c)(2)(C) of 
such Code is amended by striking ``preventive care deductible'' and 
inserting ``certain deductibles''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this subsection shall 
apply to months beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §554b. Medical care for employees engaged in hazardous work; notification and transportation of employees

Appropriations for the Forest Service shall be available for medical supplies and services and other assistance necessary for the immediate relief of artisans, laborers, and other employees engaged in any hazardous work under the Forest Service, and for expenses of notifying employees of the death or serious illness of close relatives and, in such cases where no public transportation is available, for transporting the employees to a point where public transportation is available.

(Sept. 21, 1944, ch. 412, title II, §202, 58 Stat. 736; Pub. L. 85–464, §4, June 20, 1958, 72 Stat. 217.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as a part of the Department of Agriculture Organic Act of 1944.

#### Amendments

1958—Pub. L. 85–464 made appropriations available for expenses of notifying employees of the death or serious illness of close relatives, and for transportation of employees.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

May 21, 2021

In the Matter of

Generation NEXT Franchise Brands, Inc.,

File No. 500-1

ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF

TRADING

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Generation NEXT 

Franchise Brands, Inc. (“VEND1”) (CIK No. 1526689), a defaulted Nevada corporation located 

in San Diego, California with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") Section 12(g) because it is delinquent in its 

periodic filings with the Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 

10-K for the period ended June 30, 2019. On January 19, 2021, the Commission’s Division of 

Corporation Finance (“Corporation Finance”) sent a delinquency letter to VEND requesting 

compliance with its periodic filing requirements, which was delivered. As of April 13, 2021, the 

common stock of VEND was quoted on OTC Link operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. 

(formerly “Pink Sheets”) (“OTC Link”), had six market makers, and was eligible for the 

“piggyback” exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3). 

 

1 The short form of each issuer’s name is also its stock symbol.
2

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors 

require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is 

ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the 

securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on May 

24, 2021, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on June 7, 2021.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary