alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Article 5 Fin. Data Schedule for 3rd Qtr 10-Q

<S>                               <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2002
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-2002
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-2002
<CASH>                                   203
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         203
<PP&E>                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           203
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      0
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                              51,900
<OTHER-SE>                                 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               0
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           0
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         190
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                            (190)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.00)


</TABLE>
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4725 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 1, 2020 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 8585 Criterion Drive in Colorado Springs, 

Colorado, as the ‘‘Chaplain (Capt.) Dale Goetz Memorial 

Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4725 RFS

1 SECTION 1. CHAPLAIN (CAPT.) DALE GOETZ MEMORIAL 

2 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 8585 Criterion Drive in Colorado 

5 Springs, Colorado, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Chaplain (Capt.) Dale Goetz Memorial Post Office Build7 ing’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any references in a law, map, 

9 regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Chaplain (Capt.) Dale 

12 Goetz Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 30, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
No. 22270.

#### William C. Russell, Jr., et al. *v.*Beverly Wheeler, et al.

(413 P.2d 700)

Decided April 21, 1966.

Albert B. Dawkins, Robert E. Holland and Richard D. Gilson, for plaintiffs in error.

John W. Lentz, Raymond J. Cody, for defendants in error.

*En Banc.*

Per Curiam.

The matter before us concerns the question of whether this Court has the jurisdiction to review upon writ of error the judgment of the county court of Gilpin County in a school bond election contest, or whether appellate *589review of this judgment must be had first in the District Court of Gilpin County. We hold that the proper place to seek review of such judgment is in this Court.

We have recently held that the proper forum for trial of school election contests is the county court under present statutes. *Rowland v. Theobald, et al.,*159 Colo. 1, 409 P.2d 272. *Theobald v. District Court,*159 Colo. 7, 409 P.2d 274.

It is true that Section 36 (1), Chapter 45, Session Laws of Colorado 1964, provides that appeals from county courts shall be taken to the district courts. This is a statute general in nature.

The statutes relating to school bond elections provide that the practice and procedure for contested elections for county officers shall apply to school bond election contests insofar as applicable. Contests for county officers are tried in the District Court with appellate review by writ of error to this Court. There is one trial and one appeal. We hold that there has been created by the applicable statutes a specific exception to the general statute with regard to review of county court judgments in the case of school bond election contests. The proper procedure to obtain review of such county court judgments is by writ of error to this Court.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of American Realty
Investors, Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q/A/2 for the period ended March 31,
2002, as filed with Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Ronald E. Kimbrough, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Acting Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:     March 4, 2003                        /s/ Ronald E. Kimbrough
     -----------------------                  ----------------------------------
                                              Ronald E. Kimbrough
                                              Executive Vice President
                                              and Chief Financial Officer
                                              (Principal Financial and
                                              Accounting Officer and
                                              Acting Principal Executive Officer
(No. 81-CV-0901

#### *In re*Application of Gayle Kinder.

*Order filed December 31, 1981.*

Gayle Kinder, *pro se,*for Claimant.

Tyrone C. Fahner, Attorney General (Maureen Cain, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

Poch, J.

This claim arises out of an incident that occurred on November 23, 1980. Gayle Kinder seeks compensation pursuant to the provisions of the Crime Victims Compensation Act, hereafter referred to as the Act. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 70, par. 71 *et seq.*

This Court has carefully considered the application for benefits submitted on the form prescribed by the Court and an investigatory report of the Attorney General of Illinois which substantiates matters set forth in the application. Based upon these documents and other evidence submitted to the Court, the Court finds:

1. That on November 23, 1980, the Claimant was the victim of a hit-and-run accident as he was walking on the shoulder of Camp Jackson Highway, Cahokia, Illinois. *550The Claimant was taken to Memorial Hospital for treatment of a fractured leg. The driver of the vehicle was not apprehended.

2. That the issue presented to the Court is whether an injury incurred as a result of the reckless operation of a motor vehicle, including leaving the scene of the accident, may be the basis for an award under the Act.

3. That in *In re Stevens*(1976), 31 Ill. Ct. Cl. 610, the Court held: “It is the opinion of this Court that the Illinois General Assembly did not intend to include compensation for non-intentional motor vehicle offenses.”

While a hit-and-run case is. a crime, it is not one of the crimes specifically enumerated in the Act as being the basis of a claim under the Act.

It is therefore hereby ordered, that this claim be, and is hereby denied.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

RICHMOND DIVISION

RE: John Taylor Jordan XXX-XX-4139

Carla Yvonne Jordan XXX-XX-6083

Case No. 17-33374-KRH

DIRECTIVE FOR VOLUNTARY PAYMENTS BY DEBTOR

The Debtor(s) having filed a petition under Chapter 13, Title 11 U.S.C. or converted this case 

from Chapter 7;

IT IS DIRECTED;

That commencing immediately and continuing on the 2nd day of each and every month 

thereafter until further Directive from the Trustee, the Debtor(s) shall pay to Carl M. Bates, 

Trustee, and send to Chapter 13 Trustee, PO Box 1433, Memphis, TN 38101-1433, the sum 

of $792.00 monthly. The payment should include the debtor's name and case number above.

Future Payments

Start Date Amount Frequency

09/02/2019 $1,152.00 monthly

THIS DIRECTIVE IS ENTERED PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER NO. 04-1 OF THE 

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT.

Dated: August 03, 2017

/S/ Carl M. Bates

Carl M. Bates, Trustee

Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division

Case 17-33374-KRH Doc 22 Filed 08/03/17 Entered 08/03/17 16:26:06 Desc 

 Page 1 of 2
The Trustee does hereby certify that a copy of this Directive was mailed to the Debtor and 

electronically sent to Debtor’s counsel on the date above written.

/S/ Carl M. Bates

Carl M. Bates, Trustee

Case 17-33374-KRH Doc 22 Filed 08/03/17 Entered 08/03/17 16:26:06 Desc 

 Page 2 of 2
### §459b–2. Establishment

#### (a) Notice in Federal Register

As soon as practicable after August 7, 1961, and following the acquisition by the Secretary of an acreage in the area described in section 459b of this title that is in the opinion of the Secretary efficiently administrable to carry out the purposes of sections 459b to 459b–8 of this title, the Secretary shall establish Cape Cod National Seashore by the publication of notice thereof in the Federal Register.

#### (b) Distribution of notice and map

Such notice referred to in subsection (a) of this section shall contain a detailed description of the boundaries of the seashore which shall encompass an area as nearly as practicable identical to the area described in section 459b of this title. The Secretary shall forthwith after the date of publication of such notice in the Federal Register (1) send a copy of such notice, together with a map showing such boundaries, by registered or certified mail to the Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and to the board of selectmen of each of the towns referred to in section 459b of this title; (2) cause a copy of such notice and map to be published in one or more newspapers which circulate in each of such towns; and (3) cause a certified copy of such notice, a copy of such map, and a copy of sections 459b to 459b–8 of this title to be recorded at the registry of deeds for Barnstable County, Massachusetts.

(Pub. L. 87–126, §3, Aug. 7, 1961, 75 Stat. 288.)
### §590l. Expansion of domestic and foreign markets for agricultural commodities; advances for crop insurance; transfer of funds to corporation

#### (a) Market expansion and surplus disposition

Whenever the Secretary finds that the exercise of the powers conferred in this section will tend to carry out the purpose specified in clause (5) of section 590g(a) of this title, or will tend to provide for and maintain a continuous and stable supply of agricultural commodities adequate to meet consumer demand at prices fair to both producers and consumers, or both, he shall use such part as he deems necessary of the sums appropriated to carry out this chapter for the expansion of domestic and foreign markets or for seeking new or additional markets for agricultural commodities or the products thereof or for the removal or disposition of surpluses of such commodities or the products thereof.

#### (b) Advances for premiums

The Secretary is authorized to make advances to producers for the purpose of assisting them to insure their crops with the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation. The Secretary shall remit the amount of any such advances to a producer directly to such Corporation in payment of the premium on the insurance for which the producer has made application. Advances shall only be made to producers who are participating or who agree to participate in a program formulated pursuant to section 590h of this title. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the terms and conditions of such advances shall be fixed by the Secretary. In carrying out the provisions of this subsection, the Secretary may transfer to the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, prior to the execution of applications for insurance or requests for advances by producers, the funds estimated as necessary to cover the advances which will be requested for the payment of premiums under a crop-insurance program, and any portion of such funds not used for advances to producers under such program shall be returned to the Secretary by the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.

(Apr. 27, 1935, ch. 85, §12, as added Feb. 29, 1936, ch. 104, §1, 49 Stat. 1151; amended Mar. 25, 1939, ch. 15, 53 Stat. 550; July 2, 1940, ch. 521, §1, 54 Stat. 727.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1940—Subsec. (b). Act July 2, 1940, inserted last sentence.

1939—Act Mar. 25, 1939, designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Administration of program of Federal Crop Insurance Corporation transferred to Secretary of Agriculture by Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946, §501, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7877, 60 Stat. 1100, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

Federal Crop Insurance Corporation consolidated with other agencies into Agricultural Conservation and Adjustment Administration for duration of World War II, see Ex. Ord. No. 9069, Feb. 23, 1942.

Functions respecting lands under jurisdiction of Department of the Interior, see Transfer of Functions note set out under section 590a of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jamell Smith, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 504]

Cardona, E J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Catena, J.), rendered January 13, 2005, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of assault in the second degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to assault in the second degree in full satisfaction of a four-count indictment. As part of the plea, defendant executed a comprehensive written waiver of his right to appeal. Defendant, who was 17 years old at the time of his arrest, was denied youthful offender status and sentenced, in accordance with the plea agreement, to two years in prison with three years of postrelease supervision.

Defendant initially asserts that he did not enter into the plea agreement knowingly or intelligently. While such a contention survives defendant’s waiver of appeal, his failure to move to vacate the judgment of conviction or to withdraw his plea renders the matter unpreserved for appellate review *(see People v Turner,*27 AD3d 962, 962 [2006]). Furthermore, we are unpersuaded that “the record casts significant doubt on defendant’s guilt so as to present an exception to the preservation requirement” *(People v Campbell,*29 AD3d 1083, 1084 [2006]), *lv denied*7 NY3d 786 [2006]). Notably, defendant did admit his intent to cause physical injury to the victim, who, among other things, sustained a broken sternum caused, at least in part, by defendant’s kicks.

Finally, defendant contends that County Court abused its discretion in denying him youthful offender status. Inasmuch as such contention was not specifically excluded from his waiver of appeal *(see People v Driggs,*24 AD3d 888, 889 n [2005]), such waiver precludes us from considering it here *(see People v Wise,*29 AD3d 1216, 1217 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 852 [2006]). In any event, were we to consider the issue, we would note that, despite the existence of positive factors in defendant’s favor, given, among other things, the serious nature of the subject crime and defendant’s participation therein, we do not find that County Court abused its considerable discretion in denying defendant youthful offender status *(see People v Delfino,*32 AD3d 1109, 1110 [2006]).

Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of BlastGard International, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the companys financial condition and results of operations.



|                 |                         | 
|---------------- | ----------------------- | 
|November 9, 2007 | /s/ Andrew McKinnon     | 
|                 | Andrew McKinnon         | 
|                 | Chief Executive Officer |
### §5603. Authorities of Secretary of State with respect to Convention

The Secretary of State may, on behalf of the Government of the United States—

(1) receive and transmit reports, requests, recommendations, proposals, and other communications of and to the Organization and its subsidiary organs;

(2) object, or withdraw an objection, to the proposal of the Commission consistent with the procedures detailed in Articles XIV and XV of the Convention;

(3) give or withdraw notice of intent not to be bound by a measure of the Commission consistent with the procedures detailed in Articles XIV and XV of the Convention;

(4) object or withdraw an objection to an amendment to the Convention; and

(5) act upon, or refer to any other appropriate authority, any other communication referred to in paragraph (1).

(Pub. L. 104–43, title II, §204, Nov. 3, 1995, 109 Stat. 379; Pub. L. 114–327, title V, §504, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1996.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Pars. (2), (3). Pub. L. 114–327 substituted "Commission consistent with the procedures detailed in Articles XIV and XV of the Convention" for "Fisheries Commission".
Editorial Note on Part 1240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1240 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10355, Mar. 3, 2003.

§ 1240.60 Definitions. As used in this subpart the term: *ABC* means *American Baptist Churches* v. *Thornburgh,* 760 F. Supp. 796 (N.D. Cal. 1991).
*ABC class member* refers to: ( 1 ) Any Guatemalan national who first entered the United States on or before October 1, 1990; and
( 2 ) Any Salvadoran national who first entered the United States on or before September 19, 1990.
*Asylum application pending adjudication by the Service* means any asylum application for which the Service has not served the applicant with a final decision or which has not been referred to the Immigration Court.
*Filed an application for asylum* means the proper filing of a principal asylum application or filing a derivative asylum application by being properly included as a dependent spouse or child in an asylum application pursuant to the regulations and procedures in effect at the time of filing the principal or derivative asylum application.
*IIRIRA* means the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, enacted as Pub. L. 104-208 (110 Stat. 3009-625).
*NACARA* means the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (NACARA), enacted as title II of Pub. L. 105-100 (111 Stat. 2160, 2193), as amended by the Technical Corrections to the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act, Pub. L. 105-139 (111 Stat. 2644).
*Registered ABC class member* means an ABC class member who: ( 1 ) In the case of an *ABC* class member who is a national of El Salvador, properly submitted an ABC registration form to the Service on or before October 31, 1991, or applied for temporary protected status on or before October 31, 1991; or
( 2 ) In the case of an *ABC* class member who is a national of Guatemala, properly submitted an *ABC* registration form to the Service on or before December 31, 1991.
### §460aa–10. Land surface protection; regulations

The Congress hereby recognizes and declares the need to take action to regulate the use of, and protect the surface values of, the Federal lands in the recreation area, and directs that rules and regulations necessary to carry out this section shall be promulgated and issued by the Secretary of Agriculture after consultation with the Secretary of the Interior. Such regulations shall include, when deemed necessary, provisions for control of the use of motorized and mechanical equipment for transportation over, or alteration of, the surface of such Federal land in connection with any authorized activities on such land, including but not limited to mineral prospecting, exploration, or development operations.

(Pub. L. 92–400, §11, Aug. 22, 1972, 86 Stat. 614.)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ANTHONY CLARK
,
Defendant Below, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE
, Appellee. § § § No. 260 , 202 3 § § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware § § Cr. ID No. 1 709012825 (K) § § §

Submitted: December 4
, 202 3 Decided: December 12 , 202 3

ORDER

(1) On July 24, 2023, t he appellant , Anthony Clark, filed a notice of appeal
from a Superior Court order sentencing him for a violation of probation . T he Court
issued a briefing schedule on August 30, 2023 ; Clark’s opening brief was due
September 29, 2023

. The appellant later requested a thirty

- day extension, which the
Court granted. On November 1, 2023
, Court staff sent a notice of brief delinquency

to Clark because he had not filed his opening brief by the deadline

. T he notice was

returned to the Court because Clark had been released from prison. Court staff
obtained a new mailing address for Clark from the Department of Correction and
reissued the notice of brief delinquency; the postal service returned that not ice as

undeliverable.2

(2) On November 16, 20 23 , after confirming th at the Department of

Correction did not have an alternative address for Clark
, Court staff issued a notice,
sent by certified mail, directing Clark to show cause why t his appeal should not be

dismissed for his failure to fil e an opening brief

. On November 21 , 202 3 , the postal

service returned the notice to show cause as undeliverable. Court staff resent the
notice by first

- class mail; the notice was again returned.

(3) The appellant having failed to respond to the notice to show ca use, to
file the opening brief, or to report any address change to the Court, dismissal of this

action is deemed unopposed.

N OW, THEREFORE, IT IS OR DERED that the appeal is DISMISSED under
Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b)

.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Abigail M. LeGrow Justice