alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
 

______________________________________________________________ 

Page is not included in this copy. 

Pages 41 through 42 are not included in this copy. 

_________________________________________________________________ 

The material not included contains the following type of 

information: 

__ __ Identity of product inert ingredients. 

__ __ Identity of product impurities. 

__ __ Description of the product manufacturing process. 

__ __ Description of quality control procedures. 

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients. 

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. 

_____ A draft product label. 

__X__ The product confidential statement of formula. 

_____ Information about a pending registration action. 

__ __ FIFRA registration data. 

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______. 

_____ The document is not responsive to the request. 

_____ Internal deliberative information. 

_____ Attorney-Client work product. 

__ __ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the 

 Agency. 

 

The information not included is generally considered confidential 

by product registrants. If you have any questions, please 

contact the individual who prepared the response to your request. 

_________________________________________________________________
§ 207.3 Waivers of inadmissibility. ( a ) *Authority.* Section 207(c)(3) of the Act sets forth grounds of inadmissibility under section 212(a) of the Act which are not applicable and those which may be waived in the case of an otherwise qualified refugee and the conditions under which such waivers may be approved.
( b ) *Filing requirements.* An applicant may request a waiver by submitting an application for a waiver in accordance with the form instructions. The burden is on the applicant to show that the waiver should be granted based upon humanitarian grounds, family unity, or the public interest. The applicant shall be notified in writing of the decision, including the reasons for denial if the application is denied. There is no appeal from such decision.
[76 FR 53783, Aug. 29, 2011]
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 1167

WINIFRED BEASLEY , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. GOODWIN HOUSE BAILEY ’ S CROSSROADS , Defendant

- Appellee , and NATASHA CHESSNOE, Salon Manager; LORI SIMPSON, Director Senior Services; DANIELLE BROKENBURR, Human Resources; PAMELA CREWS, Salon Stylist , Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Liam O’Grady , District Judge. ( 1:18

- cv
- 00837

- LO

- IDD )

Submitted : September 26, 2019 Decided: October 2, 2019

Before KING and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Winifred Beasley , Appellant Pro Se. Linda U. Okoukoni , Amanda Vaccaro , JACKSON LEWIS PC , Reston, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Winifred Beasley appeals the district court’s order granting Goodwin House Bailey’s Crossroads’ motion to dismiss Beasley’s claims that she was harassed, subjected to retaliation and a hostile work environment, and constructively discharged because of her race, in violati on of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e

- 17 (West 2012 & Supp. 201 9 ). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Beasley v. Goodwin House Bailey’s Crossroads , No. 1:18

- cv
- 00837

- LO

- IDD (E.D. Va. Jan. 15, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 426 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 426

  Expressing the sense of the Senate that Members of Congress should 
  substitute teach at least 1 day per year in a public school to gain 
firsthand knowledge on how to address the prevailing challenges facing 
    educators and how to remove obstacles to learning for students.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 14, 2019

 Mr. Kennedy submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
        the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Senate that Members of Congress should 
  substitute teach at least 1 day per year in a public school to gain 
firsthand knowledge on how to address the prevailing challenges facing 
    educators and how to remove obstacles to learning for students.

Whereas teachers play a critical role in shaping the minds and lives of 
        children;
Whereas there are projected to be 3,200,000 full-time public school teachers in 
        2020;
Whereas approximately 200,000 teachers leave the profession each year;
Whereas in the 115th Congress, there were more than 2 times as many Members of 
        Congress that had backgrounds in public service or politics than Members 
        of Congress that had backgrounds in education; and
Whereas Members of Congress should be on the ground in public schools to 
        understand the challenges that educators and students face, including 
        challenges relating to--

    (1) a growing shortage of teachers;

    (2) issues of teacher pay;

    (3) a lack of resources in both urban and rural areas;

    (4) teacher preparedness;

    (5) chronic absenteeism among students;

    (6) poverty; and

    (7) parental involvement: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes the contributions of teachers to the United 
        States;
            (2) thanks teachers for their service; and
            (3) recommends that each Member of Congress spend at least 
        1 day per year serving as a substitute teacher in a public 
        school.
                                 <all>
```
```
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-68196 on Form S-8 dated September 1, 1993, Registration Statement No. 333-63597 on Form S-8 dated September 17, 1998 and Registration Statement No. 333-125672 on Form S-8 dated June 9, 2005 of our report on the consolidated financial statements and report as to schedules included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Hickok Incorporated for the year ended September 30, 2008./s/ Meaden & Moore, Ltd.MEADEN & MOORE, Ltd.    Certified Public AccountantsDecember 2, 2008Cleveland, Ohio
```
```

Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-QSB Quarterly Report of Liska Biometry, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended March 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     o    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     o    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

May 27, 2003

/s/ Lam Ko Chau

By: Lam Ko Chau, President (Principal Executive Officer), Principal Financial
Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Secretary, Chairman of the Board
```
### §460aaa–4. Fish and game

#### (a) In general

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed as affecting the responsibilities of the State of Michigan with respect to fish and wildlife, including the regulation of hunting, fishing, and trapping in any lands acquired and managed by the Secretary under this subchapter, except that the Secretary may, in consultation with the State of Michigan, designate zones where, and establish periods when, no hunting, fishing or trapping shall be permitted for reasons of public safety, administration, the protection of nongame species and their habitats, or public use and enjoyment.

#### (b) Notice of Secretarial action

As soon as practicable after each case in which the Secretary exercises authority under subsection (a), the Secretary, in consultation with appropriate officials of the State of Michigan, shall take steps to notify area residents as to the nature of actions taken, and the location of zones designated and periods established, under subsection (a).

#### (c) Consultation

Except in emergencies, any regulations of the Secretary pursuant to this section shall be put into effect after consultation with the fish and wildlife agency of the State of Michigan.

(Pub. L. 101–292, §5, May 17, 1990, 104 Stat. 188.)
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Richmond Division

In re:

Chapter 11

Alpha Natural Resources, Inc., et al., Case No. 15-33896-KRH

(Jointly Administered)

Debtors.

ORDER

The Court hereby schedules a status conference in this case to be held on Tuesday, 

January 15, 2019 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 5000, U.S. Courthouse, 701 East Broad 

Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 101(d)(1). 

It is further ORDERED that counsel for the Reorganized Debtors, Mar-Bow Value 

Partners, LLC, McKinsey Recovery and Transformation Services U.S., LLC, and the Office of 

the United States Trustee shall appear at the above-scheduled status conference, provided, 

however, that any party wishing to appear telephonically may do so via Court-Solutions.

Dated: January 10, 2019 /s/ Kevin R. Huennekens

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

Entered on Docket: 1/10/19

Case 15-33896-KRH Doc 4186 Filed 01/10/19 Entered 01/10/19 15:31:02 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 90700 / December 17, 2020

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20003

In the Matter of

Unikrn, Inc.,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

By order dated February 22, 2019, the Commission issued the “Omnibus Order 

Directing the Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that 

Establish Distribution Funds” (“Omnibus Order”),1 authorizing the Secretary to issue 

orders for calendar years 2019-2021 appointing, upon request by the Commission staff, 

Miller Kaplan Arase LLP (“Miller Kaplan”), a certified public accounting firm, with one 

of their offices located in San Fransciso, California, as tax administrator (“Tax 

Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund may incur 

tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department of 

the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On December 16, 2020, the Commission staff requested, pursuant to the 

Omnibus Order, the appointment of Miller Kaplan as the Tax Administrator for the 

QSF in the above-referenced proceeding. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Miller Kaplan, pursuant to and in accordance 

with the Omnibus Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the abovereferenced proceeding. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 85174 (Feb. 22, 2019).
§ 710.309 Design-build projects. ( a ) In the case of a design-build project, ROW must be acquired and cleared in accordance with the Uniform Act and the FHWA-approved ROW manual or RAMP, as provided in § 710.201(c) and (d). The grantee shall submit a ROW certification in accordance with 23 CFR 635.309(p) when requesting FHWA's authorization. The grantee shall ensure that ROW is available prior to the start of physical construction on individual properties.
( b ) The decision to advance a ROW segment to the construction stage shall not impair the safety or in any way be coercive in the context of 49 CFR 24.102(h) with respect to unacquired or occupied properties on the same or adjacent segments of project ROW.
( c ) The grantee may choose not to allow construction to commence until all property is acquired and relocations have been completed; or, the grantee may permit the construction to be phased or segmented to allow ROW activities to be completed on individual properties or a group of properties, with ROW certifications done in a manner satisfactory to the grantee for each phase or segment.
( d ) If the grantee elects to include ROW services within the design-builder's scope of work for the design-build contract, the following provisions must be addressed in the request for proposals document: ( 1 ) The design-builder must submit written certification in its proposal that it will comply with the process and procedures in the FHWA-approved ROW manual or RAMP as provided in § 710.201(c) and (d).
( 2 ) When relocation of displaced persons from their dwellings has not been completed, the grantee or design-builder shall establish a hold off zone around all occupied properties to ensure compliance with ROW procedures prior to starting construction activities in affected areas. The limits of this zone should be established by the grantee prior to the design-builder entering onto the property. There should be no construction-related activity within the hold off zone until the property is vacated. The design-builder must have written notification of vacancy from the grantee prior to entering the hold off zone.
( 3 ) Contractors activities must be limited to those that the grantee determines do not have a material adverse impact on the quality of life of those in occupied properties that have been or will be acquired.
( 4 ) The grantee will provide a ROW project manager who will serve as the first point of contact for all ROW issues.
( e ) If the grantee elects to perform all ROW services relating to the design-build contract, the provisions in § 710.307 will apply. The grantee will notify potential offerors of the status of all ROW issues in the request for proposal document.
January 2020

ISSUE

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES

American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/AN) face a number of environmental hazards that affect

their health status, such as living in remote and isolated locations that expose residents to severe

climatic conditions, hazardous geography, and disease-carrying insects and rodents. Other factors

include limited availability of housing and extensive use of sub-standard housing; unsanitary

methods of sewage and waste disposal; and unsafe water supplies.

BACKGROUND

The Indian Health Service (IHS) Environmental Health Services (EHS) program includes the

specialty areas of injury prevention and institutional environmental health. The IHS EHS program

identifies environmental hazards and risk factors in tribal communities and proposes control

measures to prevent adverse health effects. These measures include monitoring and investigating

disease and injury in tribal communities; identifying environmental hazards in community facilities

such as food service establishments, Head Start Centers, community water supply systems, and

health care facilities; and providing training, technical assistance, and project funding to develop the

capacity of tribal communities to address their environmental health issues.

STATUS

There are substantial

disparities in health

status between AI/ANs

and the rest of the U.S.

population, especially

for illness and injury

rates. For instance, in 

2018 the rate of West 

Nile virus in the AI/AN 

population was over 

two times higher than

other races combined.

Implementation of

effective environmental

health and injury

prevention strategies can substantially reduce disease and injury rates. For example, as the number 

of services provided by IHS to food service establishments and drinking water systems increased 

129%, the rate of food and waterborne diseases in the U.S decreased 78% (graph).

OPTIONS/PLANS

Through shared decision making and sound public health measures, the IHS EHS program seeks to

enhance the health and quality of life for AI/ANs by eliminating environmentally related diseases

and injuries. The IHS works closely with tribes and other partners to identify priorities and develop

actions plans to address environmental health issues such as food safety, children’s environment

(schools, foster care, day care facilities, etc.), vector-borne and communicable diseases, safe

drinking water, and healthy homes.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

For referral to the appropriate spokesperson, contact the IHS Public Affairs Staff at 301-443-3593.

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

**# OF SERVICES PROVIDED

(IHS DATA)

*RATE/100,000

(CDC DATA)

Food and Waterborne Disease Rates and 

Services Provided by IHS in 

Food Service Facilities and Water Systems

* Food/Waterborne Disease Rate ** Services Provided
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134708 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134708 

 COA: 278504 

Wayne CC: 97-000790

FREDERICK L. TERRY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 1, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

t1119 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2007 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BONTEX,
INC.'S AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, 1998, AS SET FORTH IN THE COMPANY'S 1998 ANNUAL REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS
AND ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                 517
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       12,303
<ALLOWANCES>                                           268
<INVENTORY>                                          6,436
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    19,729
<PP&E>                                              23,924
<DEPRECIATION>                                      11,882
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      32,513
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               18,722
<BONDS>                                              2,256
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  157
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                          10,734
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        32,513
<SALES>                                             43,483
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    43,571
<CGS>                                               31,080
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       44,154
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       252
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,056
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (583)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         (137)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (446)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (446)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.28)
        


</TABLE>
### §406d–4. Acceptance of other lands by Secretary of the Interior

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to accept the donation of the following-described lands, which lands, upon acceptance by the United States, shall become a part of the national park:

### sixth principal meridian

Township 41 north, range 116 west: Section 3, lots 1 and 2.

Containing seventy-eight and ninety-three one-hundredths acres, more or less.

(Sept. 14, 1950, ch. 950, §7, 64 Stat. 852.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal of Inconsistent Laws

Repeal of laws inconsistent with act Sept. 14, 1950, see note set out under section 406d–1 of this title.
#### Henry B. AYERS et al., Plaintiffs, v. WESTERN LINE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellants, v. Ms. Bessie B. GIVHAN et al., Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees.

No. 75-3485.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 28, 1979.

J. Robertshaw, Greenville, Miss., for Western, etc.

James L. Robertson, Greenville, Miss., for Washington, etc.

Fred L. Banks, Jr., Nausead L. Stewart, Phillip J. Brookins, Jackson, Miss., for plaintiffs-intervenors-appellees.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before GEWIN, RONEY and HILL, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

Our judgment and decision in the above captioned case, 555 F.2d 1309 (5th Cir. 1977), which reversed, D.C., 404 F.Supp. 1225, was reversed by the Supreme Court in *Givhan v. Western Line Consolidated School District,*- U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 693, 58 L.Ed.2d 619 (1979). Accordingly, we remand the case to the district court for further consideration in light of the opinion of the Supreme Court.
#### Frank Miller, Respondent, v. New York Butchers’ Dressed Meat Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ,
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00479-CR

CHAD PIERCE COFFEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 213th District Court

of Tarrant County (1543453D)

February 28, 2019

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth 

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth