alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  174,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,200
<INVENTORY>                                      5,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               194,500
<PP&E>                                       2,069,200
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,233,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,357,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          254,500
<BONDS>                                        461,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       250,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     151,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,357,400
<SALES>                                        679,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               679,100
<CGS>                                          253,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  495,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                148,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                    52,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             96,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    96,800
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 23.14

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement of Hercules Incorporated on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-37279,
33-21668, 33-21667, 33-47664, 33-51178, 33-52621, 33-66136, 33-62314, 33-65352,
333-38795, 333-38797 and 333-68863) and on Form S-3 (Registration Nos. 333-63423
and 333-29225) of our report dated November 13, 2002, relating to our audits of
the consolidated financial statements of Hercules Credit, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000 and for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2001, which report is included in this Form
10-K/A.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
December 11, 2002
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Richmond

In re

STEAMERS THREE LLC Case No. 16-32596

Chapter 7

Debtors

REPORT OF DEPOSIT OF UNCLAIMED FUNDS

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3011 and 11 U.S.C. §347, the 

trustee herein submits a check payable to “Clerk, United States Bankruptcy Court” 

representing unclaimed funds to be deposited by the Clerk of the Court into the 

Treasury of the United States. Said funds are subject to withdrawal as provided by 28 

U.S.C. 2042 and shall not escheat under any state law. The unclaimed funds represent 

the dividend(s) due and payable to:

Creditor’s Name and Address Amount of Dividend

William Alan Taylor

12 Rosewood Street

Fredericksburg, VA 22405

$220.16

Andre Cannady $772.88

415 Dundee Place

Fredericksburg, VA 22405

Dated: August 11, 2020 /s/ Peter Barrett

Peter Barrett, Trustee

KUTAK ROCK LLP

901 East Byrd Street

Suite 1000

Richmond, Virginia 23219

(804)343-5237

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing Report of Deposit of Unclaimed Funds

was electronically served or mailed to Office of the U.S. Trustee, on August 11, 2020.

Case 16-32596-KRH Doc 106 Filed 08/11/20 Entered 08/11/20 12:00:31 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 1
### §561. Repealed. Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 654, §1(45), 65 Stat. 703

Section, act Mar. 15, 1920, ch. 100, §§3, 4, 41 Stat. 531, related to transfer of surplus telephone supplies from the Military Establishment to the Department of Agriculture for use of the Forest Service.
### §559g. Designation authority of Secretary of Agriculture

#### (a) Purpose

It is the purpose of this section to authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to make law enforcement operations more efficient in connection with the administration and use of the National Forest System.

#### (b) Officers of other agencies

The Secretary is authorized to designate law enforcement officers of any other Federal agency, when the Secretary determines such designation to be economical and in the public interest, and with the concurrence of that agency, to exercise the powers and authorities of the Forest Service while assisting the Forest Service in the National Forest System, or for activities administered by the Forest Service.

#### (c) Acceptance by Forest Service

The Forest Service is authorized to accept law enforcement designation from any other Federal agency or agency of a State or political subdivision thereof for the purpose of cooperating in the investigation and enforcement of any Federal or State law or ordinance and regulation of any such agency, when such investigation or enforcement is mutually beneficial to the National Forest System and the cooperating agency or jurisdiction, upon entering into a memorandum of understanding or cooperative agreement with such agency or jurisdiction.

(Pub. L. 99–570, title XV, §15008, as added Pub. L. 100–690, title VI, §6254(e), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4365.)
Exhibit 23


                        Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


   The Board of Directors
   Hein-Werner Corporation:

   We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement
   (No. 2-68020) on Form S-8 of Hein-Werner Corporation of our report dated
   February 20, 1996, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Hein-
   Werner Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and
   the related consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for each
   of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1995, and our
   report dated February 20, 1996, relating to the financial statement
   schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
   1995 which reports appear in the December 31, 1995 Annual Report on Form
   10-K of Hein-Werner Corporation.


                                                    /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                                        KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


   Milwaukee, Wisconsin 
   March 20, 1996
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         486,812
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,357,634
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,912,858
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,194,528
<PP&E>                                       5,092,372
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,670,111
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,980,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,569,775
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     1,192,850
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,042,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,980,801
<SALES>                                     26,171,461
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,323,319
<CGS>                                       17,044,039
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,729,004
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             151,858
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,437,875
<INCOME-TAX>                                   478,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            959,875
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   959,875
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .80
        

</TABLE>
(54 South. 938.)

No. 18,679.

#### ARATA v. NEW ORLEANS RY. & LIGHT CO.

(April 10, 1911.)

*(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)*

Appeal and Error (§ 627*) — Transcript — Filing Time.

Where tbe transcript on an appeal was not filed until two days after the return day as extended, the appeal will be dismissed.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Appeal and Error, Cent. Dig. §§ 2744-2749, 3126; Dec. Dig. *Í*627.*]

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Fred D. King, Judge.

Action by Mrs. Anais Arata against the New Orleans Railway & Light Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

Dismissed.

E. S. Whitaker, for appellant. Dart, Kernan & Dart, for appellee.

PROYOSTY, J.

A motion has been made to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the transcript was filed after the expiration of the extension of time granted for filing it.

The return day was February 23, 1911. On application, it was extended to March 2, 1911. The transcript was filed on March 4, 1911. The appeal must be dismissed. Mutual Loan v. First Baptist Church, 48 La. Ann. 1458, 21 South. 24; Le Blanc v. Lemaire, 52 La. Ann. 1635, 28 South. 105. Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001102203
<NAME>                        TF Creations Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Oct-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Nov-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jan-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         585
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               585
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       550
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,050
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   585
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,015)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,015)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,015)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.005)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
<PAGE>


Exhibit 31.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Ronald B. Alexander, certify that:

         (1) I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K
of Analex Corporation (the "Company") for the year ending December 31, 2002;

         (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

         (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         (4) The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

                  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

                  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and; and

                  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's
most recent fiscal quarter (the Company's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially effect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

         (5) The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

                  (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the Company's internal controls.


Date: September 5, 2003




/s/ Ronald B. Alexander
-----------------------------------
Ronald B. Alexander
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Ellis S. FRISON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-1206.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2002.

Decided May 22, 2002..

Ellis S. Frison, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Ellis S. Frison, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying him injunctive relief. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Frison v. Principi,*No. CA-01-3280 (D. Md. filed Nov. 7, 2001 *&*entered Nov. 8, 2001; Dec. 21, 2001; Feb. 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 500

1 

## ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION III No . CR

- 12

- 900

PAMELA HOOKS APPELLANT
V.
STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE Opinion Delivered September 18, 2013
APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT , FIRST DIVISION [NO. CR

- 2010

- 4212 ]
HONORABLE LEON JOHNSON , JUDGE
REBRIEFING ORDERED BRANDON J. HARRISON , Judge A Pulaski County jury found Pamela Hooks guilty of second-degree murder. Ark. Code Ann. § 5- 10 -103 (Repl. 2006). She was then sentenced to 720 months’ imprisonment. Hooks argues on appeal that the circuit court erred in denying her motion for a directed verdict because the State failed to sufficiently prove its case against her. We
cannot decide the merits of Hooks’s appeal at this point because she has failed to abstract material parts of the trial testimony. Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(5) (20 13 ) provides: (5) Abstract . The appellant shall create an abstract of the material parts of all the transcripts (stenographically reported material) in the record. Information in a transcript is material if the information is essential for the appellate court to confirm its jurisdiction, to understand the case, and to decide the issues on appeal.Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 500

2 In her brief, Hooks challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support her conviction (on the element that she intended John Davis’s death) , but her abstract omits her own trial testimony. Hooks’s trial testimony is essential to understand the issues and decide thi s

case ’s merits. Spears v. State , 82 Ark. App. 376, 109 S.W.3d 139 (2003). We therefore direct Hooks to correct this deficiency by filing a substituted brief within fifteen days of
this order ’s date

. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3) (2013). After service of her substituted brief, the State may file a responsive brief in the time prescribed by the supreme court clerk, or
it may choose to rely on the appellee ’s brief it previously filed. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3).
We encourage Hooks’s counsel to review our rules and her current abstract and addendum to ensure that no additional deficiencies are present. Rebriefing ordered.
B ROWN and W HITEAKER , JJ., agree. James Phillips and Elizabeth Borders , Deputy Public Defenders, by: Clint Miller , Deputy Public Defender, for appellant.
Dustin McDaniel , Att ’ y Gen., by: Vada Berger , Ass ’ t Att ’ y Gen., for appellee.
### §460jj–5. Filing of maps

As soon as practicable after October 11, 1978, the Secretary shall file a map and legal description of the Indian Peaks Wilderness Area and the Arapaho National Recreation Area with the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the House of Representatives and such description shall have the same force and effect as if included in this subchapter, except that correction of any clerical or typographical errors in such map and description may be made. Such map and the map entitled "Indian Peaks Wilderness Area and Arapaho National Recreation Area", dated July 1978, shall be on file and made available for public inspection in the offices of the Chief of the Forest Service, Department of Agriculture.

(Pub. L. 95–450, §9, Oct. 11, 1978, 92 Stat. 1097.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the House of Representatives changed to Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives on Jan. 5, 1993, by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Third Congress.
09/17/2020 H315822- CS

10 کاری راکه برای ادارهاعراضو عالئم

کووید 19 خودتان می‌توانیددر خانه انجامدهید

کاپی قابل دسترس: html.sick-when-steps/sick-are-you-if/ncov/2019-coronavirus/gov.cdc.www://https

اگر احتامالً کووید 19 دارید یا این مسئله تأیید شده است:

مکتب نروید. و از رفتن به سایر . در خانه بمانید و بهمحل کار و

اماکن عامه دوری کنید. اگر به

واسطه بیرون رفتن ضرورت دارید

از کدام ترانسپورت عامه، واسطه

اشتراکی یا تکسی دوی کنید.

	. اعراضو عالئم خود را با

دقت کنترول کنید. اگر اعراض

و عالئم شما بدتر شد، فورا با

ارائه‌دهنده خدمات صحی خود به

تماس شوید. 

بنوشید. 	. استراحتکنید و آبزیاد

	. اگر وقت مالقات معالجوی دارید،

زودتر از موعد با ارائه‌دهنده

مراقبت‌های صحی به تماس

شوید و به آنها بگوییدکهکووید 19

دارید یاممکن است به آن مبتال باشید.

	. در حصه واقعات عاجل طبی،

با نمبر 911 به تماس شوید و

پرسونل ارسالی را متوجه

کنیدکهکووید 19 دارید یا

ممکن است به آن مصاب باشید.

	. سرفه یا عطسه خود را با

یک دستمال کاغذی بپوشانید

یا صورت خود را با قسمت

داخلی آستین خود بگیرید.

	. دستهایخود را مکررا و

حداقل به مدت20 ثانیه با آب و

صابون شسته کنید، یا دست های

خود را با یک مایع ضد عفونی کننده

الکول دار بشوییدکه حداقل %60

الکول داشته باشد. 

	. تا حدامکان،در یکاطاقاختصاصی

و دور ازسایر اشخاصخانه و

حیواناتخانگیخودبمانید. اگر

ممکن است بایداز یکتشناب جداگانه

استفادهکنید. اگر ضرورت داریدداخل یا

خارج از خانهنزدیک افراددیگر باشید،

ماسکبپوشید.

اختیار دیگر اعضای فامیل مانند . از قرار دادن وسایل شخصی در

ظروف، دستپاک‌ها و روی‌جایی‌ها

خودداری کنید.

 10.تمام سطوحی که اکثرا لمس

می‌شوند مانند باجه‌ها، روی میزها

و دستگیر دروازه‌ها را پاک کنید. 

از اسپری‌های پاک کننده خانگی

یا دستمال مرطوب مطابق به

طرزالعمل‌های باالی لیبل آنها

استفاده کنید.

coronavirus/gov.cdc
```
       [NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
                 United States Court of Appeals
                     For the First Circuit





No. 98-2107

                       GIUSEPPE PELLERITO,

                      Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                v.

                          UNITED STATES,

                       Defendant, Appellee.



           APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                 FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

          [Hon. Jose Antonio Fuste, U.S. District Judge]



                              Before

                     Boudin, Circuit Judge,
                Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,
                   and Stahl, Circuit Judge.
                                
                                
                                
                                
     Giuseppe Pellerito on brief pro se.
     Guillermo Gil, United States Attorney, Miguel A. Fernandez,
Assistant United States Attorney, and Rebecca Vargas-Vera,
Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.





May 12, 1999



                                
                                


            Per Curiam.  Upon careful review of the briefs and
  record, we find no basis for this appeal from the district
  court's order dated August 3, 1998.  That order essentially
  granted the relief sought by petitioner in his pro se � 2255
  motion, and it adopted the parties' agreed payment plan, which
  plan petitioner personally ratified by his affidavits.  This
  court is not the proper forum in the first instance for a claim
  of present inability to comply with the August 3 order. 
  Petitioner's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is
  wholly frivolous. 
            Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
```
#### John L. Campbell, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant.

Present— Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.