alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Elmer L. Duncan and William C. Kelderhouse, Appellants, as Executors, and Alice E. Doyle, Respondent, as Executrix, etc., of John Kelderhouse, Deceased.

—Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon stipulation filed.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**CERTIFICATIONI, John Horan, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of Ablest Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.         */s/ John Horan*   John Horan   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   Date: April 25, 2007
#### Emma M. Pitman et al. v. Elbert Ireland.

Filed May 8, 1902.

No. 11,478.

Commissioner’s opinion, Department No. 3.

Mortgagor: Right of Intervention. A mortgagor who has conveyed lands by an unconditional deed of general warranty, is entitled to intervene for the purpose of pleading usury in an action to foreclose the mortgage.

Error from the district court for Sheridan county. Tried below before Westover, J.

*Reversed.*

*Albert W. Grites}*for plaintiffs in error.

*W. W. Wood, contra.*

Ames, C.

Benjamin Lammers procured a loan from the Showalter Mortgage Company, a corporation, and to secure its payment executed and delivered bis note and a mortgage on certain real estate. By various mesne conveyances the lands were conveyed to the plaintiff in error Pitman, and by sundry mesne assignments the note and mortgage came to the defendant in error, Ireland. Ireland brought this action to foreclose the mortgage, to which be made the bolder of the title, Pitman, sole party defendant. Lammers applied for leave to intervene for the purpose of pleading usury, and his motion was denied. He and Pitman bring the case here, assigning such denial for error.

In our opinion the application should have been granted. The pleadings show that Pitman acquired the land by an unconditional deed of general warranty, making no reference to the mortgage. It is elementary law that when the grantee in such a conveyance is attacked by a claim which, if maintained, may divest him of bis title, be has a right to “vouch” his warrantor, as it is called; that is, be may notify the latier of the pendency of the suit and *676require him to come in and defend at his peril, if lie fails so to do, of being concluded by its results in a subsequent action against him upon the covenants in his deed. Rawle, Covenants for Title, 228, *et seq.*Now the application of Lammers for leave to intervene, was intended to accomplish precisely this purpose, which was necessary as well for his protection as for that of his warrantee, and the latter not less than the former was entitled to have the amount of the incumbrance diminished by any lawful means, instead of being driven to his personal action upon his covenants.

It is recommended that the judgment of the district court be reversed, and the case remanded for further proceedings according to law.

Duffie and Albert, CC., concur.

By the Court: For the reasons stated in the foregoing opinion, it is ordered that the judgment of the district court be reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings according to law.

Reversed and remanded.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 334 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 334

Instructing the managers on the part of the Senate on the bill S. 1790 
(116th Congress) to insist upon the provisions contained in section 316 
      of the Senate bill (relating to a prohibition on the use of 
perfluoroalkyl substances and polyfluoroalkyl substances for land-based 
                  applications of firefighting foam).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2019

    Mr. Peters (for himself and Mr. Bennet) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Instructing the managers on the part of the Senate on the bill S. 1790 
(116th Congress) to insist upon the provisions contained in section 316 
      of the Senate bill (relating to a prohibition on the use of 
perfluoroalkyl substances and polyfluoroalkyl substances for land-based 
                  applications of firefighting foam).

    Resolved, That the managers on the part of the Senate at the 
conference on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses on the House 
amendment to the bill S. 1790 (116th Congress) are instructed to insist 
upon the provisions of section 316 of the Senate bill (relating to a 
prohibition on the use of perfluoroalkyl substances and polyfluoroalkyl 
substances for land-based applications of firefighting foam).
                                 <all>
```
### §566. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–313, §16(a)(1), formerly §13(a)(1), July 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 374; renumbered §16(a)(1), Pub. L. 101–624, title XII, §1215(1), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3525

Section, acts June 7, 1924, ch. 348, §3, 43 Stat. 653; May 5, 1944, ch. 189, 58 Stat. 216; May 5, 1972, Pub. L. 92–288, §3(a), 86 Stat. 134, authorized expenditures by the Secretary of Agriculture for study of effects of tax and other laws on forest perpetuation, etc.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1978, see section 17 of Pub. L. 95–313, set out as an Effective Date note under section 2101 of this title.
### §63. Transportation of birds, animals, or fish; violations of statute or rules or regulations for management, care, and preservation of parks; damage or spoliation; punishment

Any person or persons, or stage or express company, or railway company, who knows or has reason to believe that they were taken or killed contrary to the provisions of sections 57, 58, and 60 to 65 of this title, and who receives for transportation any of said animals, birds, or fish so killed, caught, or taken, or who shall violate any of the other provisions of said sections, or any rule or regulation that may be promulgated by the Secretary of the Interior, with reference to the management and care of the said parks, or either of them, or for the protection of the property therein for the preservation from injury or spoliation of timber, mineral deposits, other than those legally located prior to the passage of the respective Acts creating and establishing said parks, natural curiosities, or wonderful objects within said parks, or either of them, or for the protection of the animals, birds, or fish in the said parks, or either of them, or who shall within said parks commit any damage, injury, spoliation to or upon any building, fence, hedge, gate, guidepost, tree, wood, underwood, timber, garden, crops, vegetables, plants, land, springs, mineral deposits other than those legally located prior to the passage of the respective Acts creating and establishing said parks, natural curiosities, or other matter or thing growing or being thereon, or situated therein, shall be subject to the penalty provided for the violation of rules and regulations of the Secretary of the Interior authorized by section 3 of the Act of Congress approved August 25, 1916 (Thirty-ninth Statutes, page 535), entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes".1

(June 2, 1920, ch. 218, §5, 41 Stat. 732.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 3 of the Act of Congress approved August 25, 1916 (Thirty-ninth Statutes, page 535), entitled "An Act to establish a National Park Service, and for other purposes", referred to in text, is section 3 of act Aug. 25, 1916, ch. 408, 39 Stat. 535, which enacted section 3 of this title. Section 3 of the Act was repealed and restated as section 1865(a) of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and sections 100751(a), 100752, 100753, and 102101 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs, by Pub. L. 113–287, §§3, 4(a)(1), 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3094, 3260, 3272.

1 See References in Text note below.
EXHIBIT 24

P0WER OFATTORNEY

        KNOWALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned Chairman and director ofHibernia Corporation, a Louisiana corporation (the “Corporation”),does hereby name, constitute and appoint Robert H. Boh, Cathy E. Chessin, GaryL. Ryan, and each of them (with full power to each of them to act alone), histrue and lawful agents and attorneys-in-fact, for him and on his behalf and inhis name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign, execute,acknowledge, deliver, and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (orany other governmental or regulatory authority), the Annual Report of theCorporation on Form 10-K (or other appropriate form) for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2000, and any and all amendments thereto, with any and all exhibitsand any and all other documents required to be filed with respect thereto or inconnection therewith, granting unto said agents and attorneys, and each of them,full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thingrequisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises in order toeffectuate the same as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersignedmight or could do if personally present, and the undersigned hereby ratifies andconfirms all that said agents and attorneys-in-fact, or any of them, maylawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. 

        INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand on this13th day of December 2000.
### §6102. Purposes

The purposes of this chapter are—

(1) to perpetuate healthy populations of neotropical migratory birds;

(2) to assist in the conservation of neotropical migratory birds by supporting conservation initiatives in the United States, Canada, Latin America, and the Caribbean; and

(3) to provide financial resources and to foster international cooperation for those initiatives.

(Pub. L. 106–247, §3, July 20, 2000, 114 Stat. 593; Pub. L. 109–363, title III, §302(b), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2075.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Par. (2). Pub. L. 109–363 inserted "Canada," after "United States,".
#### § 312.3 Testing of applicants who obtained permanent residence pursuant to section 245A of the Act.

An applicant who has obtained lawful permanent resident alien status pursuant to section 245A of the Act, and who, at that time, demonstrated English language proficiency in reading and writing, and knowledge of the government and history of the United States through either an examination administered by USCIS or the INS or a standardized section 312 test authorized by the USCIS or the INS for use with Legalization applicants as provided in section 245A(b)(1)(D)(iii) of the Act, will not be reexamined on those skills at the time of the naturalization interview. However, such applicant, unless otherwise exempt, must still demonstrate his or her ability to speak and understand English in accordance with 8 CFR 312.1(c)(1) and establish eligibility for naturalization through testimony in the English language.

[76 FR 53798, Aug. 29, 2011]
#### Alice Doellinger, Respondent, v. New York Evening Journal Publishing Company, Appellant. Alice Doellinger, Respondent, v. Star Company, Appellant.

Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
#### KENTUCKY UTILITIES COMPANY, Movant, v. Lin M. MOUNTJOY, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 6, 1941.

T. M. Galphin and Gordon, Laurent, Ogden & Galphin for movant.

Ollie J. Bowen, opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied; judgment affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 232 (Friday, December 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 75462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30486]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, December 8, 2010; 2 p.m.-3 p.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered: 

Compliance Status Report

    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: November 30, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-30486 Filed 12-1-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
§ 236.13 Ineligible aliens. The following categories of aliens are ineligible for benefits under the Family Unity Program: ( a ) An alien who is deportable under any paragraph in section 237(a) of the Act, except paragraphs (1)(A), (1)(B), (1)(C), and (3)(A); provided that an alien who is deportable under section 237(a)(1)(A) of such Act is also ineligible for benefits under the Family Unity Program if deportability is based upon a ground of inadmissibility described in section 212(a)(2) or (3) of the Act;
( b ) An alien who has been convicted of a felony or three or more misdemeanors in the United States;
( c ) An alien described in section 241(b)(3)(B) of the Act; or
( d ) An alien who has committed an act of juvenile delinquency (as defined in 18 U.S.C. 5031) which if committed by an adult would be classified as: ( 1 ) A felony crime of violence that has an element the use or attempted use of physical force against another individual; or
( 2 ) A felony offense that by its nature involves a substantial risk that physical force against another individual may be used in the course of committing the offense.
[62 FR 10360, Mar. 6, 1997, as amended at 65 FR 43680, July 14, 2000]
---

CERTIFICATION OF
  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dennis Petke, Chief Financial Officer of Aucxis Corp. (the
  Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
  the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
        of the Company, for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003, and to
        which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Report)
        fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                

| | By:    | /s/ Dennis Petke       
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | DENNIS PETKE           
| |        |                        
| | Title: | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | November 19, 2003      

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**Certificationof Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Hilton HotelsCorporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,that the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for theyear ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Date: March 10, 2006 |                                                    |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | /s/ STEPHEN F. BOLLENBACH                               |   |
|                      | Stephen F. Bollenbach                                   |
|                      | *Co-Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive  Officer* |

 

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Reportpursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made beforeor after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.

 

----
f9- Off/;

3TM Ttf£

ftWSTT M Jk f^rX/^ COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUG 03 2015

KoN^D fhl ^cMt^^^bM< AbelAcoBla.Ctertc

3

Pro Ss_ #a^ i«*4^.trt^' «"> iNvc &4?o^<_ 5^y '«-*{ fl^ nw/Mbt/-^

f<L^sh tik*-t d*-*- fa A*'< TMPZ6&MT ^±+4-pt• Jhi\u4- T&.& p
**SECURITIESAND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington,D.C. 20549**
**FORM 10-KANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**
For the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2000                                                                                       Commission file No. 1-10294

**HIBERNIACORPORATION**
#### New York Institute for the Education of the Blind, Appellant and Respondent, v. Colonial Sand & Stone Co., Inc., et al., Respondents, and Alexander Meyer, Respondent and Appellant.

Present — Cars-well, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
HECO Exhibit 32.4



Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc.



Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer Furnished Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted by

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc. (HECO) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the HECO Report), I, Tayne S. Y. Sekimura, Chief Financial Officer of HECO, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that:



|(1) | The HECO Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The HECO consolidated information contained in the HECO Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition as of December 31, 2005 and results of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 of HECO and its subsidiaries.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Tayne S. Y. Sekimura
|Tayne S. Y. Sekimura    
|Financial Vice President
|Date: March 7, 2006     



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc. and will be retained by Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.