### Appendix C: Summary of Hg Test Reports Reviewed for Consistency

**Pass/Fail Facility ID**  **Unit ID Fuel**  **Category Combusto** 

**r Design Test Date**  **Run # Method**  **used (29 or ?)**  **Particulate front half?**  **y/n Sample**  **time (min.) Sample** 

**volume (dscf)**  **Sample**

**volume (dscm)**  **Filter**

**temperatu re (avg.**  **deg. f) Reported** 

**Value (lb/Mmbt**  **u) Firing rate**  **(Mmbtu / hr)**  **Percent H2O (Bws)**  **CorrectedSUM of**

**Hg Fractions Notes**  **Actions Taken in EPA ICR Databases**

PASS ARPotlatchForestWarren Wellons Boiler Biomass Dutch Oven/Pile Burner 40065 1Method 29 y 240 208.754 5.9112494 247.8< 0.000000548 318.42 21.06 4.4E+00Ten minute stop in the run not explained in the report; believe that the filter had to be changed at this point due to blinding per lab report PASS ARPotlatchForestWarren Wellons Boiler Biomass Dutch Oven/Pile Burner 40065 2 Method 29 y 240 220.995 6.2578756 246.25< 0.000000546 304.04 20.23 3.3E+00Filter combined with front half rinse? PASS ARPotlatchForestWarren Wellons Boiler Biomass Dutch Oven/Pile Burner 40066 3 Method 29 y 240 217.503 6.1589933 247.9< 0.00000053 321.69 21.47 3.4E+00No HCl rinse necessary PASS CACovantaDelano Unit 1 Biomass FB 4/21/2009 1Method 29 y 120 100.827 2.8551 251< 0.000000267 414 10.7 6.7E-01 Did not see duplicate analysis results PASS CACovantaDelano Unit 1 Biomass FB 4/21/2009 2 Method 29 y 120 102.364 2.898623 245.25< 0.000000294 427 11.5 7.7E-01 PASS CACovantaDelano Unit 1 Biomass FB 4/21/2009 3 Method 29 y 120 101.458 2.8729679 250.92< 0.0000004 421 11.5 1.0E+00 PASS CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Light LiquidN/A 40043 1Method 29 y 240 153.219 4.3386748 249.52 7.56E-08 7.28 10.6 4.1E-01Could not find firing rate, so back calculated from PM data PASS CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Light LiquidN/A 40044 3 Method 29 y 240 153.208 4.3383633 249.46 7.62E-08 6.59 10 3.8E-01matrix spike duplicate is below limit PASS CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Light LiquidN/A 40044 4Method 29 y 240 151.403 4.2872515 249.17 7.68E-08 6.5 9.01 3.7E-01Could not find firing rate, so back calculated from PM data

PASS FLCFRC252 Boiler #3 (McBurney) Wet Biomass

Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

2/4/2003 1Method 29 y 60 49.908 1.4132358 254.75 3.7E-07 74.85 13.21 4.3E-01 Fourth impinger (empty one) was not included in the sampling train

PASS FLCFRC252 Boiler #3 (McBurney) Wet Biomass

Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

2/4/2003 2 Method 29 y 60 45.423 1.2862349 254.9 3.36E-07 69.15 10.22 7.6E-01 Post test leak check not noted on run 2, pre test leak check okay

PASS FLCFRC252 Boiler #3 (McBurney) Wet Biomass

Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

2/4/2003 3 Method 29 y 60 44.795 1.2684519 255.05 3.97E-07 63.74 9.54 3.8E-01 It appears that front half was combined with the first set of impingers PASS FLRayonierPerformance PB06 Biomass FB 8/14/2008 1Method 29 n 120 80.598 2.2822791 250.92< 2.39E-7 12.5 24.1 1.0E+00Bark and TDF; hold in first run due to weather; no lab report

PASS FLRayonierPerformance PB06 Biomass FB 8/14/2008 2 Method 29 n 120 77.547 2.1958844 247.42< 2.11E-7 12.09 23.4 9.5E-01 Post test leak check not noted on run 2, pre test leak check okay PASS FLRayonierPerformance PB06 Biomass FB 39675 3 Method 29 n 120 67.32 1.9062883 251.83< 1.50E-7 10.28 21.4 8.6E-01Could not find firing rate, so back calculated PASS FLRayonierPerformance PB06 Biomass FB 8/18/2008 1Method 29 n 120 78.359 2.2188777 235.88< 3.48E-7 11.34 23.5 1.3E+00Bark, Sludge, and TDF; no lab report PASS FLRayonierPerformance PB06 Biomass FB 8/18/2008 2 Method 29 n 120 77.714 2.2006133 239.42< 3.15E-7 11.49 23.5 1.3E+00Could not find firing rate, so back calculated

PASS FLRayonierPerformance PB06 Biomass FB 8/18/2008 3 Method 29 n 120 76.063 2.1538623 242.54< 1.89E-7 11.28 22.3 1.2E+00Post test leak check not noted; mid point leak check noted, so this may have been an error in data placement. Pre and mid okay. PASS FLRayonierPerformance PB06 Biomass FB 9/10/2008 1Method 29 n 120 76.412 2.1637448 245.67< 2.13E-7 11.26 21.7 9.6E-01 Bark and Sludge; no lab report PASS FLRayonierPerformance PB06 Biomass FB 39722 2 Method 29 n 120 70.516 1.9967889 245.5< 1.86E-7 10.66 20.7 8.5E-01Could not find firing rate, so back calculated PASS FLRayonierPerformance PB06 Biomass FB 39722 3 Method 29 n 120 72.781 2.0609265 247.88< 3.61E-7 10.56 24.4 1.4E+00post test pitot leak check not noted. Initial good. FAIL GAGPMadisonPly 800 Wood Waste Boiler Wet Biomass

Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

6/19/2003 1Method 29 y 120 0 <6.432E-7 14.2 0.0E+00Boiler grates were raked during Run 1 FAIL GAGPMadisonPly 800 Wood Waste Boiler Wet Biomass

Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

6/19/2003 2 Method 29 y 120 0 <5.211E-7 13.8 0.0E+00No data in the report to support this test FAIL GAGPMadisonPly 800 Wood Waste Boiler Wet Biomass

Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

6/19/2003 3 Method 29 y 120 0 <5.737E-7 15.1 0.0E+00 FAIL GAGPMadisonPly 800 Wood Waste Boiler Wet Biomass

Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

6/19/2003 1Ontario Hydro y 120 0 6.808E-07 15.7 0.0E+00Boiler grates were raked during Run 1 FAIL GAGPMadisonPly 800 Wood Waste Boiler Wet Biomass

Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

6/19/2003 2Ontario Hydro y 120 0 7.39E-07 14.9 0.0E+00No data in the report to support this test FAIL GAGPMadisonPly 800 Wood Waste Boiler Wet Biomass

Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

6/19/2003 3Ontario Hydro y 120 0 6.302E-07 16.3 0.0E+00 PASS GAGPMadisonPly 800 Wood Waste Boiler Wet Biomass

Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

8/11/2009 1Ontario Hydro n 240 176.217 4.9899051 252.88 5.7E-07 286.39 12.8 2.6E+00grates raked during test PASS GAGPMadisonPly 800 Wood Waste Boiler Wet Biomass

Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

40037 2Ontario Hydro n 240 171.561 4.8580619 249.81 4.7E-07 274.63 14.7 2.2E+00Test paused due to weather; grates raked during test PASS GAGPMadisonPly 800 Wood Waste Boiler Wet Biomass

Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

40037 3Ontario Hydro n 240 172.454 4.8833489 250.31 4.5E-07 274.9 15.1 2.3E+00Could not find firing rate, so back calculated PASS GAInternationalPaperAugustaMills PB3A Wet Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

8/10/2007 1 29Y 120 62.864 1.7801086 242 4.5E-07 15 1.7E+00

PASS GAInternationalPaperAugustaMills PB3A Wet Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

8/10/2007 2 29Y 120 70.654 2.0006966 245 6.68E-07 16 2.0E+00The testing is sound, but the calculations are based on results that do not take into account data reported BDL

PASS GAInternationalPaperAugustaMills PB3A Wet Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

8/10/2007 3 29Y 120 68.063 1.9273277 244 5.53E-07 16 1.7E+00Detected data plus sum of detection limits should be the reported value. PASS HIPuuneneSugarMill Boiler 1 Biomass Suspension/Grate 5/28/2006 1 29Y 180 98.787 2.7973337 254 4.12E-07 393.20388 1.1E+00

PASS HIPuuneneSugarMill Boiler 1 Biomass Suspension/Grate 5/28/2006 2 29Y 180 95.978 2.7177917 243 3.36E-07 401.78571 8.6E-01 Boiler 1 and Boiler2 share a common outlet, and thus common results. Not much Hg in begasse.

PASS HIPuuneneSugarMill Boiler 1 Biomass Suspension/Grate 5/28/2006 3 29Y 180 118.402 3.3527681 268 5.29E-07 347.82609 1.5E+00Results reported at detection level in an appropriate manner. PASS HIPuuneneSugarMill Boiler 2 Biomass Suspension/Grate 5/28/2006 1 29Y 180 98.787 2.7973337 254 4.12E-07 393.20388 1.1E+00

PASS HIPuuneneSugarMill Boiler 2 Biomass Suspension/Grate 5/28/2006 2 29Y 180 95.978 2.7177917 243 3.36E-07 401.78571 8.6E-01 Boiler 1 and Boiler2 share a common outlet, and thus common results. Not much Hg in begasse.

PASS HIPuuneneSugarMill Boiler 2 Biomass Suspension/Grate 5/28/2006 3 29Y 180 118.402 3.3527681 268 5.29E-07 347.82609 1.5E+00Results reported at detection level in an appropriate manner. PASS ILCornProductsInt B10 Coal FB 1/23/2007 1 29Y 120 69.38 1.964621 249 1.92E-07 1515.625 7.84 1.6E+00

PASS ILCornProductsInt B10 Coal FB 1/23/2007 2 29Y 120 70.43 1.9943536 251 1.89E-07 1529.1005 8.02 1.6E+00Results reported at the highest single component detection limit. Sum of all detection limits should be the reported value. PASS ILCornProductsInt B10 Coal FB 1/23/2007 3 29Y 120 70.11 1.9852922 248 1.9E-07 1526.3158 7.99 1.6E+00

PASS ILCornProductsInt B10 Coal FB 4/8/2008 1 29Y 120 74.8 2.1180981 251 3.96E-08 1580.8081 8.87 1.6E+00There is no explaination why detection on R1 filter is 5x better than other tests. This data is suspect, and I think should be reported much higher.

PASS ILCornProductsInt B10 Coal FB 4/8/2008 2 29Y 120 72.48 2.0524031 254 1.84E-07 1559.7826 9.68 1.7E+00Results reported at the highest single component detection limit. Sum of all detection limits should be the reported value. PASS ILCornProductsInt B10 Coal FB 4/8/2008 3 29Y 120 73.06 2.0688269 253 1.82E-07 1582.4176 8.58 1.6E+00 PASS ILPolyOne B1 Coal FB 11/14/2006 1 29Y 120 85.115 2.4101861 2.19E-07 107.76256 6.7 5.4E-01

PASS ILPolyOne B1 Coal FB 11/14/2006 2 29Y 120 83.675 2.3694099 2.28E-07 103.07018 8 5.6E-01 Results reported at detection level in an appropriate manner.

PASS ILPolyOne B1 Coal FB 11/14/2006 3 29Y 120 87.072 2.4656021 2.17E-07 106.45161 6.8 4.4E-01 Not sure what is going on here...looks like data was reported at a nominal DL value, but DL for this run was lower than the others. PASS INTateLyleSagamore 31B1 Coal PC 9/1/2009 1 29Y 240 161.58 4.5754318 251 4.06E-07 216.74877 8.42 3.1E+00

PASS INTateLyleSagamore 31B1 Coal PC 9/1/2009 2 29Y 240 139.34 3.9456657 249 4.49E-07 181.06904 8.79 3.1E+00BDL results not included in reported emissions. Emissions should be higher by approx. 30% PASS INTateLyleSagamore 31B1 Coal PC 9/1/2009 3 29Y 240 133.63 3.7839766 250 4.41E-07 165.98639 8.59 2.9E+00

FAIL KYNewPage-Wickliffe B09 CONDINTION 1 Wet Biomass

Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

9/28/2005 1 29y 120 84.796 2.4011531 318 4.50E-07 273 0.166 8.3E-01 Test run ignored from analyses; remaining two runs for the test were not ignored PASS KYNewPage-Wickliffe B09 CONDINTION 1 Wet Biomass

Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

9/28/2005 2 29y 120 91.306 2.5854956 321 7.50E-07 316 0.163 1.7E+00 PASS KYNewPage-Wickliffe B09 CONDINTION 1 Wet Biomass

Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

9/28/2005 3 29y 120 97.028 2.7475244 330 6.00E-07 385 0.186 8.9E-01 PASS KYNewPage-Wickliffe B09 CONDINTION 2 Wet Biomass

Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

9/28/2005 1 29y 120 94.26 2.6691434 333 6.30E-07 410 0.207 1.9E+00 PASS KYNewPage-Wickliffe B09 CONDINTION 2 Wet Biomass

Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

9/28/2005 2 29y 120 86.917 2.461213 327 4.70E-07 354 0.199 1.2E+00 PASS KYNewPage-Wickliffe B09 CONDINTION 2 Wet Biomass

Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

9/28/2005 3 29y 120 91.778 2.5988611 328 5.90E-07 353 0.174 1.5E+00 FAIL MEBoralexStratton Boiler #1 Wet Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

10/20/2009 1 29N 240 168.8 4.7798792 3.42E-07 0.0E+00 FAIL MEBoralexStratton Boiler #1 Wet Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

10/20/2009 2 29N 240 169.22 4.7917723 2.41E-07 0.0E+00 FAIL MEBoralexStratton Boiler #1 Wet Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

10/20/2009 3 29N 240 168.75 4.7784634 3.17E-07 0.0E+00 PASS MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Dry BiomassStoker/SlopedGrate/Other 7/12/2006 1 29Y 90 68.96 1.9527279 1.47E-06 395At saturation 3.1E+00 PASS MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Dry BiomassStoker/SlopedGrate/Other 7/12/2006 2 29Y 90 55.59 1.574132 9.84E-07 438At saturation 1.9E+00 PASS MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Dry BiomassStoker/SlopedGrate/Other 7/12/2006 3 29Y 90 61.31 1.7361042 8.34E-07 477At saturation 1.7E+00 PASS MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Dry BiomassStoker/SlopedGrate/Other 9/22/2010 2 29Y 240 139.834 3.9596542 99.75 5.39E-07 0.18 2.1E+00 PASS MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Dry BiomassStoker/SlopedGrate/Other 9/22/2010 3 29Y 240 136.646 3.8693802 91.2 4.82E-07 0.18 1.9E+00 PASS MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Dry BiomassStoker/SlopedGrate/Other 9/22/2010 4 29Y 240 127.831 3.6197674 108.9 4.38E-07 0.18 1.7E+00 PASS MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Dry BiomassStoker/SlopedGrate/Other 9/28/2010 1 29Y 300 137.153 3.8837368 92.3 6.61E-07 0.14 1.7E+00 PASS MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Dry BiomassStoker/SlopedGrate/Other 9/28/2010 2 29Y 240 169.443 4.7980869 88.7 6.88E-07 0.132 2.3E+00 PASS MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Dry BiomassStoker/SlopedGrate/Other 9/28/2010 3 29Y 240 126.858 3.5922151 82.5 4.66E-07 0.149 1.4E+00 PASS NDCargillWestFargo Foster Wheeler Boiler (EU43) Biomass FB 8/25/2009 1 29y 240 126.485 3.581653 93.1 1.01E-07 32.9 0.074 1.5E+00 PASS NDCargillWestFargo Foster Wheeler Boiler (EU43) Biomass FB 8/25/2009 2 29y 240 134.933 3.8208735 85.9 1.48E-07 32.97 0.076 1.5E+00 PASS NDCargillWestFargo Foster Wheeler Boiler (EU43) Biomass FB 8/25/2009 3 29y 240 138.135 3.9115439 79.5 6.30E-08 33.18 0.077 1.5E+00 PASS NYBlackRiverGen E00001, E00002, E00003 Coal FB 8/18/2009 4ASTM D 6784-02 n 120 93.621 2.651049 261 2.72E-08 7.9 9.2E-02 PASS NYBlackRiverGen E00001, E00002, E00003 Coal FB 8/18/2009 5ASTM D 6784-02 n 120 77.728 2.2010098 268 3.54E-08 7.7 1.0E-01 PASS NYBlackRiverGen E00001, E00002, E00003 Coal FB 8/18/2009 6ASTM D 6784-02 n 120 88.341 2.5015362 257 2.53E-09 7 8.0E-03

PASS TNBowaterNewsprint Bubbling Fluidized Bed Boiler Biomass FB 10/6/2005 1N 29y 60 44.229 1.2524246 252.2 0.0000003 639 0.232 8.5E-01no fuel rate documentation; no moisture calcs or documentation; few blank values PASS TNBowaterNewsprint Bubbling Fluidized Bed Boiler Biomass FB 10/6/2005 2N 29y 60 44.634 1.2638929 251.4 0.0000004 639 0.256 9.4E-01 PASS TNBowaterNewsprint Bubbling Fluidized Bed Boiler Biomass FB 10/6/2005 3N 29y 60 41.309 1.1697395 251.4 0.0000003 639 0.254 7.5E-01 PASS TNBowaterNewsprint Bubbling Fluidized Bed Boiler Biomass FB 10/6/2005 1S 29y 60 32.963 0.9334073 253.6 0.0000003 639 0.207 9.1E-01 PASS TNBowaterNewsprint Bubbling Fluidized Bed Boiler Biomass FB 10/6/2005 2S 29y 60 31.301 0.8863448 255.3 0.0000004 639 0.234 9.1E-01.03 RDL PASS TNBowaterNewsprint Bubbling Fluidized Bed Boiler Biomass FB 10/6/2005 3S 29y 60 45.924 1.3004216 253.8 0.0000003 640 0.25 8.3E-01 PASS TNCargillMemphis Stoker Boiler 8001 Bituminous Coal

Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

40030 1 29n 266 169.383 4.7963879none recorded 4.1E-07 469.7 6.7 1.8E+00report has 26 minute time discrepancy regarding runtime FAIL TNCargillMemphis Stoker Boiler 8001 Bituminous Coal

Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

40031 2 29 runs 2 and 3 lack traverses on one axis FAIL TNCargillMemphis Stoker Boiler 8001 Bituminous Coal

Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

40031 3 29 runs 2 and 3 lack traverses on one axis PASS TNMilanArmyAmmunitionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-0010-86 Light Liquid (#2 fuel oil)

N/A 11/17/2009 1 29 216 169.188 4.7908661 247.6 7.7E-08 5.7 0.091 5.0E-01 PASS TNMilanArmyAmmunitionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-0010-86 Light Liquid (#2 fuel oil)

N/A 2 29 216 170.974 4.84144 243.8 6.5E-08 5.9 0.087 4.3E-01 PASS TNMilanArmyAmmunitionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-0010-86 Light Liquid (#2 fuel oil)

N/A 3 29 216 171.329 4.8514924 244.2 7E-08 5.9 0.091 4.3E-01 Test ignored from all analyses since all test runs are flagged as failures
Test ignored from all analyses since all test runs are flagged as failures

Test ignored from all analyses since all test runs are flagged as failures

Test ignored from all analyses since two test runs are flagged as failures These three units all go to one stack and are not distiguished between in the testing. I would recommend to not use this as it is 3separate boilers. There was only distinguishing between ParticleRun 1 had a smaller diameter nozzle used, hence the smaller

volume with more sampling time This report needs to be looked into more if we want to use it as the reported values are less than the sum of the MDL values in some

cases. Replaced values BD as 0. The MMBTU data was averaged from a

CMS monitoring steam. NO LAB REPORT DATA FOR Hg!!!!! There was no indication that an HCl rinse was preformed but the value in that column was reported in the lab report under the 3C data tag. The KMnO4 portion of the Run 3 sample was broken during shipment. The Run 2 MnO4-1 and 3C analytical values were used to calculate the total value. There was no indication that an HCl rinse was preformed but the value in that column was reported in the lab