alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
August 30th, 2015

From: Danny Haws 616 Hacienda Drive Camarillo, CA 93012 Cell ; ( 805) 444

- 4625 Email; hawsstudios@gmail.com

Re: Exemption Request under Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act Docket ID: FAA

- 2015

- 3462

To Whom It May Concern,

Today, 10/29/2015, I received a letter advising that you are unable to process my request for an exemption from Tit le 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), stating that I must provide the reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is how it would benefit the public as a whole. The following response is how I feel granting me this exempti on would directly benefit the public’s interest and the community around me:

The use of an UAS in the real estate industry provides both buyers and sellers a higher level of service. It is able to capture images that allow for a higher level of marketing a nd advertising. This in turn makes the property appealing to more buyers, resulting in a quicker sale of their home. Quicker home sales also help accelerate the economy as a whole. Property Buyers experience the benefit of encompassing a whole property, so metimes several acres, in one photo or a short video. Not only does this benefit the specific home seller or home buyer, but it benefits the general public because it is much more efficient than traditional ways of using a plane or helicopter to achieve th e same result. We can now provide this level of service while being conservative with fuel, time, emissions, noise, and other resources. Considering size, weight, speed, and absence of combustible fuels, my UAS will have much less of a safety concern for t he general public when compared to larger manned aircraft.

If you have any further questions, or would like to speak to me personally please contact me at the
above listed information.

Respectfully,

Danny Haws
Exhibit 32

                                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of A Better  Way  Financial
Corp.,  on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §410ccc. Findings and purposes

#### (a) Findings

The Congress finds that—

(1) the Natchitoches area along Cane River, established in 1714, is the oldest permanent settlement in the Louisiana Purchase territory;

(2) the Cane River area is the locale of the development of Creole culture, from French-Spanish interactions of the early 18th century of today's living communities;

(3) the Cane River, historically a segment of the Red River, provided the focal point for early settlement, serving as a transportation route upon which commerce and communication reached all parts of the colony;

(4) although a number of Creole structures, sites, and landscapes exist in Louisiana and elsewhere, unlike the Cane River area, most are isolated examples, and lack original outbuilding complexes or integrity;

(5) the Cane River area includes a great variety of historical features with original elements in both rural and urban settings and a cultural landscape that represents various aspects of Creole culture, providing the base for a holistic approach to understanding the broad continuum of history within the region;

(6) the Cane River region includes the Natchitoches National Historic Landmark District, composed of approximately 300 publicly and privately owned properties, four other national historic landmarks, and other structures and sites that may meet criteria for landmark significance following further study;

(7) historic preservation within the Cane River area has greatly benefitted from individuals and organizations that have strived to protect their heritage and educate others about their rich history; and

(8) because of the complexity and magnitude of preservation needs in the Cane River area, and the vital need for a culturally sensitive approach, a partnership approach is desirable for addressing the many preservation and educational needs.

#### (b) Purposes

The purposes of this subchapter are to—

(1) recognize the importance of the Cane River Creole culture as a nationally significant element of the cultural heritage of the United States;

(2) establish a Cane River Creole National Historical Park to serve as the focus of interpretive and educational programs on the history of the Cane River area and to assist in the preservation of certain historic sites along the river; and

(3) establish a Cane River National Heritage Area and Commission to be undertaken in partnership with the State of Louisiana, the City of Natchitoches, local communities and settlements of the Cane River area, preservation organizations, and private landowners, with full recognition that programs must fully involve the local communities and landowners.

(Pub. L. 103–449, title III, §302, Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4757.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 103–449, title III, §301, Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4757, provided that: "Titles III and IV of this Act [enacting this subchapter] may be cited as the 'Cane River Creole National Historical Park and National Heritage Area Act'."
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940

Release No. 35034 / October 23, 2023

In the Matter of

T. ROWE PRICE OHA SELECT PRIVATE CREDIT FUND

OHA PRIVATE CREDIT ADVISORS LLC

1 Vanderbilt Avenue

16th Floor

New York, NY 10017

(812-15481)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 6(c) OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 

GRANTING AN EXEMPTION FROM SECTIONS 18(a)(2), 18(c), 18(i) AND 61(a) OF THE 

ACT

T. Rowe Price OHA Select Private Credit Fund and OHA Private Credit Advisors LLC, filed an

application on July 5, 2023, and filed an amendment to the application on September 13, 2023, 

requesting an order under section 6(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Act”) granting

an exemption from sections 18(a)(2), 18(c), 18(i) and 61(a) of the Act. The order permits certain

closed-end management investment companies that have elected to be regulated as business 

development companies to issue multiple classes of shares with varying sales loads and assetbased service and/or distribution fees.

On September 25, 2023, a notice of the filing of the application was issued (Investment 

Company Act Release No. 35022). The notice gave interested persons an opportunity to request 

a hearing and stated that an order disposing of the application would be issued unless a hearing 

was ordered. No request for a hearing has been filed, and the Commission has not ordered a 

hearing.

The matter has been considered and it is found, on the basis of the information set forth in the 

application, that granting the requested exemption is appropriate in the public interest and 

consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy and 

provisions of the Act. 
2

Accordingly, in the matter of T. Rowe Price OHA Select Private Credit Fund and OHA Private 

Credit Advisors LLC (File No. 812-15481),

IT IS ORDERED, under section 6(c) of the Act, that the requested exemption from sections 

18(a)(2), 18(c), 18(i) and 61(a) of the Act is granted, effective immediately, subject to the 

condition in the application.

For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, under delegated authority.

Sherry R. Haywood,

Assistant Secretary.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 1032 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 -NM - 079 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR - M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
### §429a–1. Tupelo National Battlefield; acquisition of additional lands

To further the purposes of sections 429 and 429a of this title, the Secretary of the Interior may acquire by donation or with donated funds not to exceed one-half acre of land and interests in land for addition to the adjoining Tupelo National Battlefield site.

(Pub. L. 87–133, §1, Aug. 10, 1961, 75 Stat. 336.)
EXHIBIT 32.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Liska Biometry, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Charles R. Benz, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Christopher J. LeClerc, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of his knowledge, respectively, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


      Dated: September 6, 2006      By: /s/ Charles R. Benz
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        Charles R. Benz, Chief Executive Officer
                                        Liska Biometry, Inc.


      Dated: September 6, 2006      By: /s/ Christopher J. LeClerc
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        Christopher J. LeClerc,
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        Liska Biometry, Inc.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136696 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136696 

 COA: 284108 

Lapeer CC: 06-008983-FH 

GREGORY DEAN MESECAR,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 5, 2008 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her dissenting 

statement in People v Conway, 474 Mich 1140 (2006). 

d1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
#### § 973.202 Applicability.

The provisions in this subpart are applicable to the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and the Indian Tribal Governments (ITGs) that are responsible for satisfying these requirements for management systems pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 204.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 50997 Summary Calendar

ANGEL

- LUIS MARTINEZ, JR.,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v. STATE OF TEXAS, Mike Waldman; Shelly Stimple; MIKE WALDMAN; SHELLY STRIMPLE,

Defendants

- Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:18

- CV

- 134

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * Angel

- Luis Martinez, Jr. filed an action in the district court challenging
his Texas state court conviction for aggravated assault and sentence of fifty years imprisonment , and bringing claims against individuals for their alleged actions as prosecutors in obtaining the conviction . T he district court dismiss ed the action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Proced ure 12(b)(5) for insufficient

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 12, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-50997 Document: 00514992829 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/12/2019No. 18

- 50997

2 service of process and Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted

. Martinez appeal ed

. We now A FFIRM for the same reasons given by the district court

. Case: 18-50997 Document: 00514992829 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/12/2019
### §606. Offense for unlawful cutting on mineral lands; punishment

Any person or persons who shall violate the provisions of sections 604 and 605 of this title, or any rules and regulations in pursuance thereof made by the Secretary of the Interior, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction, shall be fined in any sum not exceeding $500, and to which may be added imprisonment for any term not exceeding six months.

(June 3, 1878, ch. 150, §3, 20 Stat. 89.)
#### Edwin R. LaVin, Respondent, v. Russell C. LaVin et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur. [179 Misc. 1000.]
#### Aaron HOLSEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William W. SONDERVAN, Commissioner, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 01-8093.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 30, 2002.

Decided May 22, 2002.

Aaron Holsey, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Aaron Holsey appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition and denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. *See Holsey v. Sondervan,*No. CA-01-2558-JFM (D. Md. Sept. 25, 2001; Oct. 9, 2001; filed Dec. 3, 2001, entered Dec. 4, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
# Official Journal L 286/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.286.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 286 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5629 October 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.286.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 286

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5629 October 2013

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2013/531/EU |
| | * | Council Decision of 22 October 2013 providing precautionary Union medium-term financial assistance to Romania | 1 |
| | | 2013/532/EU |
| | * | Council Decision of 22 October 2013 granting mutual assistance for Romania | 4 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

2013/531/EU

*

Council Decision of 22 October 2013 providing precautionary Union medium-term financial assistance to Romania

1

2013/532/EU

*

Council Decision of 22 October 2013 granting mutual assistance for Romania

4

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Nomination of Eugene Meyer to Be a Member of the Federal Reserve Board

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking and Currency, 1913-1970					,	Carey, Robert D., 1878-1937					 and 	Seventy-First Congress, 1929-1931. 						*Nomination of Eugene Meyer to Be a Member of the Federal Reserve Board : Hearings Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Banking and Currency, United States Senate, Seventy-First Congress, Third Session, January 27, 28, 31, February 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7, 1931*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										January 27, 28, 31, February 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7, 1931,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/784,			accessed on September 7, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GR I GO R T AS AL YA N, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 71257 A ge nc yN o. A 077- 993- 666 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r19, 2010 ** B efo re: O ’ S C A N N L A IN , L E A V Y , an dT A L L M A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. G r i gorT a s a l y a n, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of A rm e ni a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B o ar do f I m m ig ra ti o n A p p ea ls’ (“B IA ”) o rd eraf firm in g an im m ig ra ti o n ju d g e’s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , a nd pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on 

# FI LED NO V 01 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 71257 2 u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o rs u b s tan tia l e v id e n c e , H usye v v . Mukasey , 5 2 8 F .3 d1 1 7 2 , 1 1 7 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) , a n dw e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . S u b s ta n tia l e v id e n c e s up p o rts th e a g e n c y ’s a d v e r s e c r e d ib ility det erm i nat i on because T as al yan’ s heari ng t es t i m on y and hi s a i rporti nt ervi ew st at em en t s w ere i n co n si st en tas t o h i s reaso n s fo r co m i n g t o th e U n i t edS t at es, w h e th e rh e h a db e e n a rr e s te din A rm e n ia , a n dw h e th e rh e f e a r e dr e tu rn in g to A rm e n ia , s e e L i v . A s h c r o ft , 3 7 8 F .3 d9 5 9 , 9 6 2 -6 3 (9 th C ir. 2 0 0 4 ), an dT as alya n ’s as ylum appl i ca t i on om i tt ed hi s e m pl oym entas a dri ver f or the A rm eni an N at i on al M o v e m e n t, se e H

usye v , 528 F . 3d a t1183. T he I Jpr ope r l yc ons i de r e d a nd r e j e c t e d T a s a ly a n ’s e x p la n a tio n s f o rth e in c o n s is te n c ie s . Se e Li , 378 F . 3d a t963. I n the abse nce of cr edi bl e t es t i m on y, T as al yan’ s a sy l um and w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al c la im s f a il. Se e Fa ra h v . A s h c r o ft , 34 8 F . 3d 11 53 , 11 56 (9th C i r. 20 03 ). B e c aus e T a s a l y a n’ s C A T c l a i m i s ba s e d on t e s t i m onythe a ge nc yf ound not c r e di bl e , a nd he poi nt s t o no othe re vi de nc e t o s how i ti s m or e l i ke l ytha n nothe w o u ldb e to rtu r e dif

h e r e tu rn e dto A rm e n ia , h is C A T c la im f a ils . Se e id. at 11 56 -57. F i nal l y, the re cord do es no tsupp ortT as al yan’ s c on t ent i on thatthe B IA f a ile dto a d d r e s s h is C A T c la im . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.