alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §6856. Reports

Not later than 1 year after April 29, 2022, and annually thereafter through March 30, 2031, the Secretaries shall submit a report on the progress made by the Secretaries with respect to meeting the requirements of this chapter to—

(1) the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate;

(2) the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate;

(3) the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives; and

(4) the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.

(Pub. L. 117–114, §7, Apr. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 1177.)
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

276 KA 16-01335 PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN,

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MICHAEL SWEAT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

MICHAEL J. FLAHERTY, JR., ACTING DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (NICHOLAS T. TEXIDO OF COUNSEL), FOR APPELLANT.

MICHAEL J. STACHOWSKI, P.C., BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. STACHOWSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Penny M. Wolfgang, J.), dated May 16, 2016. The order granted that part of defendant’s omnibus motion to suppress physical evidence and statements made to the police.

It is hereby ORDERED that the case is held, the decision is reserved and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: The People appeal from an order granting that part of defendant’s omnibus motion to suppress physical evidence, i.e., a gun, and statements made to the police. At the suppression hearing, a police officer testified that he was traveling in a marked patrol vehicle when he saw defendant standing on the porch of a home. After defendant looked in the direction of the approaching patrol vehicle, he turned and entered the home. The officer pulled his vehicle to the side of the road and proceeded on foot to the porch, where he encountered defendant as he reemerged from the home. The officer asked, “What are you doing here?” When defendant did not respond, the officer conducted a search of the home and found a gun in a front closet near the entrance to the porch. Thereafter, defendant was arrested and gave statements. Supreme Court suppressed the weapon and statements on the ground that, because the initial encounter between defendant and the police was an unlawful level one encounter under People v De Bour (40 NY2d 210, 223), the ensuing search of the home was unwarranted.

We agree with the People that the court erred in suppressing the gun and statements without making any determination on defendant’s standing to challenge the allegedly unlawful search of the home. Because “our review is limited to the issues determined by the court” ( People v Schrock , 99 AD3d 1196, 1197), and the court failed to rule on the threshold issue of standing, we hold the case, reserve decision, and remit the matter to Supreme Court to rule on that issue.-2- 276 KA 16-01335

If the court determines that defendant has standing, the court should then determine whether one of the homeowners consented to the search.

Entered: March 24, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3716 — AS Watson/Marionnaud)

(2005/C 99/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 7 April 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
### §760. Establishment of rearing ponds and fish hatchery in Kentucky

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to construct, equip, maintain, and operate rearing ponds and a fish hatchery at a suitable location in Kentucky.

(July 18, 1950, ch. 465, §1, 64 Stat. 343.)
§ 14.3 Administrative claim; who may file. ( a ) A claim for injury to or loss of property may be presented by the owner of the property, his duly authorized agent or legal representative.
( b ) A claim for personal injury may be presented by the injured person, his duly authorized agent, or legal representative.
( c ) A claim based on death may be presented by the executor or administrator of the decendent's estate, or by any other person legally entitled to assert such a claim in accordance with applicable State law.
( d ) A claim for loss wholly compensated by an insurer with the rights of a subrogee may be presented by the insurer. A claim for loss partially compensated by an insurer with the rights of a subrogee may be presented by the parties individually as their respective interests appear, or jointly.
[Order No. 371-66, 31 FR 16616, Dec. 29, 1966, as amended by Order No. 1179-87, 52 FR 7412, Mar. 11, 1987]
## Open Science & Public Access

The U.S. Government defines open science as the principle and practice of making research products and processes available to all,		while respecting diverse cultures, maintaining security and privacy, and fostering collaborations, reproducibility, and equity. Within		open science is a concept known as "public access," which refers to the free availability of Federally funded scholarly materials,		including data and publications, to the American public and the world. Federal agencies have long coordinated on activities and policies		related to open science and public access to support members of the federally supported research community in maximizing appropriate		access to the products of their work and ensuring that all Americans can benefit from discovery and innovation.

### Open Science Announcements

### Public Access Plans & Guidance

### Submissions for Public Access

### Services for Public Access Collections
§ 950.7 Interoperability requirements. ( a ) For any toll facility operating pursuant to authority under a 1604 toll program, the toll agency shall— ( 1 ) Identify the projected users of the facility;
( 2 ) Identify the predominant toll collection systems likely utilized by the users of the facility; and
( 3 ) Identify the noncash electronic technology likely to be in use within the next five years in that area.
( b ) Based on the identification conducted under subsection (a), the toll agency shall receive the FHWA's concurrence that the facility's toll collection system's standards and design meet the requirements of this part.
( c ) In requesting the FHWA's concurrence, the toll agency shall demonstrate to the FHWA that the selected toll collection system and technology achieves the highest reasonable degree of interoperability both with technology currently in use at other existing toll facilities and with technology likely to be in use at toll facilities within the next five years in that area. The toll agency shall explain to the FHWA how the toll collection system takes into account both the use of noncash electronic technology currently deployed within an appropriate geographic area of travel (as defined by the toll agency) and the noncash electronic technology likely to be in use within the next five years in that area. FHWA, in determining whether to concur in the toll agency's proposal, will give appropriate weight to current and future interoperability with toll facilities in that area. The facility's toll collection system design shall include the communications requirements between roadside equipment and toll transponders, as well as accounting compatibility requirements in order to ensure that users of the toll facilities are properly identified and tolls are charged to the appropriate account of the user.
( d ) A toll agency that operates any toll facility pursuant to authority under a 1604 toll program must upgrade its toll collection system to meet any applicable standards and interoperability tests that have been officially adopted through rulemaking by the FHWA.
( e ) With respect to facilities that are tolled pursuant to the Value Pricing Pilot Program, this part only applies if tolls are imposed on a facility after the effective date of this rule. However, such facility is subject to this part if the facility's toll collection system's method or technology used to collect tolls from vehicle operators is changed or upgraded after the effective date of the regulations in this part.
( f ) Nothing in this part shall be construed as requiring the use of any particular type of electronic toll collection technology. However, any such toll collection technology must meet the interoperability requirement of this section.
#### New York Central Railroad Company, Appellant, v. Beacon Milling Company, Inc., Respondent.

Present — Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

September 13, 2021

In the Matter of

Bnet Media Group, Inc.,

File No. 500-1

ORDER OF SUSPENSION

OF TRADING

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Bnet Media Group, Inc.

(“BNTT1”) (CIK No. 1501268), a revoked Nevada corporation located in Farmington, Utah with 

a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

("Exchange Act") Section 12(g) because it is delinquent in its periodic filings with the 

Commission, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period 

ended September 30, 2019. On July 13, 2021, the Commission’s Division of Corporation 

Finance (“Corporation Finance”) sent a delinquency letter to BNTT requesting compliance with 

its periodic filing requirements, which was delivered. As of September 9, 2021, the common 

stock of BNTT was quoted on OTC Link operated by OTC Markets Group Inc. (formerly “Pink 

Sheets”) (“OTC Link”), had three market makers, and was eligible for the “piggyback” 

exception of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11(f)(3). 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors 

require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is 

ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the 

 

1 The short form of each issuer’s name is also its stock symbol.
2

securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on 

September 14, 2021, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 27, 2021.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
#### Sergio CARRANZA-HERNANDEZ; Kathleen Elizabeth Watson, an incompetent, by and through her Guardians ad Litem Vincent F. Watson and Susan L. Watson, both individually andon behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. ARTEMIS S.A.; Altus Finance, S.A.; Aurora National Life Assurance Company; New California Life Holdings, Inc.; Mutuelle Assurance; Maaf Vie, Omnium Geneve S A; Leon Black, Apollo Advisors, Inc.; Francois Pinault, S D I Vendome S A; Chauray Valeurs S A; Financiere Du Pacifique S N C; State of California, John Garamendi; Chuck Quackenbush, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 01-55075. D.C. No. CV-00-09593-AHM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 6, 2001.

Decided May 13, 2002.

*594Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TROTT, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

In a related action (No. 00-55839) Sergio Carranza-Hernandez (“Carranza”) asserted claims based on a rehabilitation plan for Executive Life Insurance Company. Carranza and co-plaintiff Elizabeth Watson filed this similar action on July 21, 2000, in Los Angeles County Superior Court. The case was removed to federal district court on September 7, 2000, by defendants/appellees Aurora National Life Assurance Company and New California Life Holdings, Inc. On December 4, 2000, the district court dismissed this action pursuant to defendants/appellees’ Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss for the same reason that it dismissed the related action: the California Insurance Commissioner has exclusive standing to bring the asserted claims. *See Garamendi v. Executive Life Ins. Co.,*17 Cal.App.4th 504, 21 Cal.Rptr.2d 578, 584 (1993).

AFFIRMED.1

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Appellees’ Supplemental Request For Judicial Notice In Support Of Brief Of Appellees Aurora National Life Assurance Company and New California Life Holdings, Inc. filed on June 26, 2001, and Appellants’ Supplemental Request For Judicial Notice RE: Interim Events filed October 31, 2001, are DENIED.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 93665 / November 23, 2021

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension, pursuant to 

Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, of trading in the securities of Instadose 

Pharma Corp. (Instadose Pharma) (CIK No. 0001697587) of Chesapeake, Virginia at 9:30 a.m. 

EST on November 24, 2021 and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EST on December 8, 2021.

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of Instadose Pharma because of 

questions and concerns regarding the adequacy and accuracy of information about the company 

in the marketplace, including: (1) significant increases in the stock price and share volume 

unsupported by the company’s assets and financial information; (2) trading that may be 

associated with individuals related to a control person of Instadose Pharma; and (3) the 

operations of Instadose Pharma’s Canadian affiliate.

The Commission cautions broker-dealers, shareholders, and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by the company.

Further, brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Rule 15c2-11 under the 

Exchange Act, at the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered unless 

and until they have strictly complied with all of the provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer 

has any questions as to whether or not it has complied with the rule, it should not enter any 

quotation but immediately contact the staff in the Division of Trading and Markets, Office of 

Interpretation and Guidance, at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is 

required by Rule 15c2-11, it should refrain from entering quotations relating to Instadose 

Pharma’s securities until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is certain that all 

of its provisions have been met. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in 

violation of the rule, the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action. 

If any broker-dealer or other person has any information that may relate to this matter, they 

should immediately contact Hane Kim, Assistant Regional Director, at (212) 336-1088. The 

Commission appreciates the assistance of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and the 

Ontario Securities Commission.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 475 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 475

 To adjust the boundary of the Arapaho National Forest, Colorado, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 10, 2019

 Mr. Neguse (for himself, Mr. Lamborn, and Mr. Tipton) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To adjust the boundary of the Arapaho National Forest, Colorado, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Arapaho National Forest Boundary 
Adjustment Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. ARAPAHO NATIONAL FOREST BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.

    (a) In General.--The boundary of the Arapaho National Forest in the 
State of Colorado is adjusted to incorporate the approximately 92.95 
acres of land generally depicted as ``The Wedge'' on the map entitled 
``Arapaho National Forest Boundary Adjustment'' and dated November 6, 
2013, and described as lots three, four, eight, and nine of section 13, 
Township 4 North, Range 76 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, Colorado. A 
lot described in this subsection may be included in the boundary 
adjustment only after the Secretary of Agriculture obtains written 
permission for such action from the lot owner or owners.
    (b) Bowen Gulch Protection Area.--The Secretary of Agriculture 
shall include all Federal land within the boundary described in 
subsection (a) in the Bowen Gulch Protection Area established under 
section 6 of the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 (16 U.S.C. 539j).
    (c) Land and Water Conservation Fund.--For purposes of section 
200306(a)(2)(B)(i) of title 54, United States Code, the boundaries of 
the Arapaho National Forest, as modified under subsection (a), shall be 
considered to be the boundaries of the Arapaho National Forest as in 
existence on January 1, 1965.
    (d) Public Motorized Use.--Nothing in this Act opens privately 
owned lands within the boundary described in subsection (a) to public 
motorized use.
    (e) Access to Non-Federal Lands.--Notwithstanding the provisions of 
section 6(f) of the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 (16 U.S.C. 539j(f)) 
regarding motorized travel, the owners of any non-Federal lands within 
the boundary described in subsection (a) who historically have accessed 
their lands through lands now or hereafter owned by the United States 
within the boundary described in subsection (a) shall have the 
continued right of motorized access to their lands across the existing 
roadway.
                                 <all>
```
### _.)t!" ' 

# ~-- GARDEN CITY

- KANSAS -

CITY COMMISSION DAN FANKHAUSER, Mayor January 8, 2014

Dennis DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division 1200New Jersey Ave. SE Washington DC 20590 .,. "'j - C1 0 

## 1:"0 •.• I . , J. _.J

Roy CESSNA MELVIN DALE Re: Essential Air Service at: Garden City, Kansas Docket OST-1998-3503 JANET DOLL CHRIS LAw

MATIHEW C. ALLEN City Manager MELINDA A. HITZ, CPA Finance Director RANDALL D, GRISELL City Counselor

CiTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER 301 N.8'" P.O. Box998 GARDEN CiTY, KS 57845-0998 520.275.1150 FAX 520.275.1159 www.garden-city.org Garden City recommends continued service with two daily roundtrips to DFW by means ofthe American Airlines proposal under the regional brand, American Eagle. Garden City recommends the flexibility forAmerican Airlines toutilize the Bombardier CRJ200 and Embraer regional jets. Garden City waives the right tohold-in American Airlines in atwo year contract upon the issuance ofa 120day notice toterminate service. Garden City greatly appreciates the opportunity to comment and provide EAS carrier recommendations. Sincerely,
Matth W .Allen Garden City Manager
Exhibit 99.1


         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE
         SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Telco-Technology,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June
30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements
          of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the
          financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.



August 9, 2002           /s/Donald R. McKelvey
Date                     Donald R. McKelvey,
                         Chairman of the Board and
                         President


August 9, 2002           /s/Donald R. McKelvey
Date                     Donald R. McKelvey,
                         Principal Financial Officer
#### Gladys Okyle, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Julius Okyle, Deceased, as Stockholder and Creditor of Highbridge Family Laundry Service, Inc., on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of Stockholders or Creditors Similarly Situated, v. Highbridge Family Laundry Service, Inc., et al. Mark L. Giller, as Substituted Receiver of Highbridge Family Laundry Service, Inc. Louis L. Schwartz et al.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                             Consent of KPMG LLP to
                      incorporation of reports in Form S-8
                         No. 33-48497 and No. 333-26007


                                      121
<PAGE>   2


                          Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors
Ablest Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements No.
33-48497 and 333-48918 on Form S-8 of Ablest Inc. of our reports dated February
16, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Ablest Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and December 26, 1999 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for
the years ended December 31, 2000, December 26, 1999 and December 27, 1998, and
related schedule, which reports appear in the December 31, 2000 annual report on
Form 10-K of Ablest Inc.


                                             KPMG LLP


Tampa, Florida
March 13, 2001


                                      122
# Official Journal C 241A/24 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 241A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6524 June 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 241A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6524 June 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2022/C 241 A/01 | Competition PE/AD/272/2022/TRAD – Intercultural and Language Professional (AD 5) | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2022/C 241 A/01

Competition PE/AD/272/2022/TRAD – Intercultural and Language Professional (AD 5)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN