# Patent

## Title
Plant body with modified program related to accumulation of storage material and the use thereof

## Abstract

The object of the invention is to provide a plant body in which the program for accumulating storage products has been modified, and applications of the same. In the invention, the plant body is constructed so as to have a B3 DNA-binding domain and an EAR motif, and so as to be capable of repressing the expression of two or more genes which code for two or more proteins having a sugar-inducible promotor function-suppressing activity.

## Background
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to technology of modifying the operability of programs relating to the accumulation of storage products and embryogenesis in plants.
BACKGROUND ART
Plants accumulate storage products in seeds, tubers and tuberous roots. Commonly known storage products include storage proteins, storage starches and storage oils. These storage products, along with serving as sources of nutrition for young plants until they become capable of autotrophic growth by means of photosynthesis, are also an important source of nutrition for animals—including man, and also serve as industrial starting materials. Such storage products generally are accumulated only at specific periods and in specific tissue associated with maturation of the plant. However, were one to have the ability to control the storage product accumulating functions of a plant, it may then be possible to modify the accumulation of storage products in terms of period, place, or quantitatively and qualitatively, and thus obtain such storage products at will. Various investigations are being conducted on the accumulation of storage products in plants towards this very end.
For example, three proteins, ABI3, FUS3 and LEC2 having the plant-specific B3 DNA-binding domain, are known to be transcriptional control factors which regulate the maturation program that includes the accumulation of storage proteins and oils in the seeds of mouse-ear cress (Arabidopsis thaliana). These proteins have been reported to regulate the seed maturation program together with the transcription factor LEC1 and the plant hormone abscisic acid (Int J Dev Biol 56, 645-651 (2005)). Elsewhere, the inventors have identified HSI2, HSI2-L1 (also referred to below as “HSL1”) and HSI2-L2 (also referred to below as “HSL2”), which are similarly B3 DNA domain-binding proteins, as transcriptional control factors associated with sugar responsive gene expression control, and conducted analyses on these factors (Plant Physiol 138, 675-685 (2005); Plant Biotech 22, 371-377 (2005)). It is known that these transcriptional control factors all have the B3 DNA-binding domain, and that a sequence similar to the transcriptional repression motif EAR is present on the C-terminal side thereof.
In addition, an attempt to increase the oil content of seeds by genetic manipulation (Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. H9-313059) and the accumulation of oils in root tips as a result of mutations (Science 277, 91-94 (1997)) have been disclosed.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
HSI2, HSI2-L1 and HSI2-L2 make up a different subfamily of transcriptional control factors than the above-mentioned proteins ABI3, FUS3 and LEC2, however, the functions of the transcriptional control factors belonging to the HSI2 subfamily are not yet clear. Moreover, the genetic control mechanisms thereof involved in the accumulation of storage products such as storage oils in plants is not yet well understood.
It is an object of the present invention may be to provide a plant body in which the program for accumulating storage products is modified, and applications thereof. Another object of the invention may be to provide a plant body capable of accumulating storage products in organs other than the normal storage organs or in periods other than the normal storage product accumulation periods, and applications thereof. Yet another object of the invention may be to provide a method of producing plant storage products.
The inventors have discovered that when the seeds of a plant homodeficient for two transcription factors associated with sugar-inducible gene expression regulation, which is obtained by crossing plants which are each homodeficient for respective transcription factors as aforestated, are germinated in the presence of sugar, the seedlings reproduce an embryogenic state without exhibiting the normal seedling growth, and storage products such as oils accumulate in the hypocotyls. In addition, the inventors have also found that, following the germination of the seeds of this homodeficient plant, the expression level of various storage-related genes increases while on the other hand the expression level of photosynthesis-related genes decreases, and that the hypocotyl following germination manifests an embryogenic state similar to that of the seed. The following inventions are provided based on these discoveries.
This invention provides a plant body being constructed so as to be capable of repressing expression of two or more genes coding for two or more proteins, each of the proteins comprises a B3 DNA-binding domain and an EAR motif and has a suppressing activity to suppress function of a sugar-inducible promoter. In the present invention, it is preferable that the sugar-inducible promoter is a sugar-inducible sweet potato sporamin minimal promoter.
In the present invention, the two or more proteins may be one or two or more of first proteins selected from among (a1) to (a3) below and one or two or more of second proteins selected from among (b1) to (b3) below. The plant body of the present invention may possess an extrinsic factor capable of repressing the expression of genes respectively coding for the first protein and the second protein.
(a1) a protein which comprises an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2;
(a2) a protein which comprises an amino acid sequence having one or more amino acids substituted, deleted, inserted and/or added in the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2, and has an activity of the same nature as a protein with the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2;
(a3) a protein which hybridizes under stringent conditions to DNA having a base sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or to a part of a complementary strand thereto, and has the activity of the same nature as the protein with the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2;
(b1) a protein which comprises an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 4;
(b2) a protein which comprises an amino acid sequence having one or more amino acids substituted, deleted, inserted and/or added in the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 4, and has an activity of the same nature as the protein with the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 4;
(b3) a protein which hybridizes under stringent conditions to DNA having a base sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3 or to a part of a complementary strand thereto, and has the activity of the same nature as the protein with the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 4.
The plant body of present invention may exhibit sugar-induced late embryogenesis-type gene expression or exhibit gene expression in which the expression level increases for one or two or more genes selected from among genes coding for sugar-induced storage product-related proteins and transcription factor genes that positively regulate the genes coding for storage product-related proteins, and in which the expression level decreases for one or two or more genes selected from among photosynthesis-related genes. Further, the plant body of the present invention may produce a storage product by sugar induction. The storage product may be a storage product in seed and preferably it may contain oil.
The plant body of the present invention may be part or all of a plant individual. In this case, the plant body may accumulate a storage product at a site other than the normal storage organ by sugar induction or the plant individual may be a seedling individual which accumulates the storage product in a hypocotyl. Further, the plant body of the present invention, the plant may be a seed, preferably the seed may accumulate a storage product by sugar induction in a hypocotyl of a seedling individual that is germinated. The plant body of the present invention, the plant may be a cultured tissue. In this aspect, the cultured may be a callus. The plant body of the present invention, the plant body may be a plant cell.
The plant body of the present invention, the plant body may be mouse-ear cress (Arabidopsis thaliana) or derived from said plant species. The plant body of this aspect, which is capable of regulating gene expression so that by sugar induction the expression level increases for one or two or more genes selected from among genes coding for sugar-induced storage product-related proteins and transcription factor genes that positively regulate the genes coding for storage product-related proteins as shown in Table 1 below, and the expression level decreases for one or two or more genes selected from among the photosynthesis-related genes as shown in the Table 1.
The present invention provides a plant body production method that may comprise a step of manufacturing a plant body which is capable of repressing expression of one or two or more of first proteins selected from among aforementioned (a1) to (a3) and one or two or more of second proteins selected from among aforementioned (b1) to (b3), the proteins have a sugar-inducible promoter function suppressing activity.
In the method of the present invention, the manufacturing step may includes creating seed by crossing plant individuals in which expression of one of the gene coding for the first protein and the gene coding for the second protein is respectively suppressed. The manufacturing step may include performing genetic manipulation to suppress expression of the gene coding for the protein.
The present invention provides a method of modifying a program for accumulating storage product in a plant body, the method may comprise a step of modifying a plant body to be capable of repressing expression of one or two or more of first proteins selected from among aforementioned (a1) to (a3) and one or two or more of second proteins selected from among aforementioned (b1) to (b3), the proteins having a suppressing activity to suppress function of a sugar-inducible promoter.
The present invention provides a method of producing a plant storage product, the method may comprise a step of producing, in the presence of sugar, a storage product in the plant body of the present invention.
The present invention provides a plant storage product production enhancer that may comprise one or two or more nucleic acid construct, the enhancer suppressing expression of one or two or more of first proteins selected from among aforementioned (a1) to (a3) and one or two or more of second proteins selected from among aforementioned (b1) to (b3).



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 shows the results of sequencing analysis (based on the Clustal W program) on the B3 domain protein family in A. thaliana, containing RAV1, RAV2, ARF1, ARF3, ABI3 and HSI2.
FIG. 2 shows the T-DNA insertion position and the positions of the primers on the HSI2 gene and the HSI2-L1 (HSL1) gene in ΔHSI2 (hsi2-2) and ΔHSI2-L1 (hsl1-1).
FIG. 3 shows the results of mRNA determinations by real-time PCR for wild-type (Col), KK strain, Δhsi2−/−/Δhsi2-l1+/− strain and Δ/hsi2+/−/Δhsi2-l1−/− strain.
FIG. 4 shows the results (photographs) of phenotype analysis on the KK strain. The photographs in the left-hand column are of the KK strain and the photographs in the right-hand column are of the wild-type strain. The numbers on the left side of the photographs in the left-hand column indicate the number of days elapsed following an imbibition treatment.
FIG. 5 shows a table of the gene groups for which the expression level in the KK strain increased more than 30-fold relative to the wild-type strain when microarray analysis was carried out on the KK strain and the wild-type strain using Agilent Arabidopsis3 oligo Microarrays.
FIG. 6 shows a table of the gene groups for which the expression level in the KK strain decreased to less than 1⁄5th that in the wild-type strain when microarray analysis was carried out on the KK strain and the wild-type strain using Agilent Arabidopsis3 oligo Microarrays.
FIG. 7A shows the expression analysis results by quantitative RT-PCR for transcriptional factor groups which function in seed ripening/embryogenesis as of day 4 or later following the imbibition treatment in wild-type and KK strain seedlings.
FIG. 7B shows the relationship between the group of transcriptional genes that are expressed 5 days after imbibition treatment in wild-type and KK strain seedlings and the culture medium sucrose concentration.
FIG. 8A shows the results of Western blotting analysis on the seed storage protein accumulation state in wild-type and KK-strain seedlings on days 4 to 9 following the imbibition treatment.
FIG. 8B shows the results of FAT RED 7B staining in wild-type and KK strain seedlings on days 5 and 12 following the imbibition treatment.
FIG. 8C shows the analytic results on lipid samples extracted from wild-type and KK strain seedlings on days 4 and 9 following the imbibition treatment.
FIG. 9 shows the results (photographs) obtained by collecting hypocotyls from wild-type and KK strains, culturing the hypocotyls in a SIM medium, and examining the cultured hypocotyls. The photographs in the left-hand column are of the wild-type strain, and the photographs in the right-hand column are of the KK strain. The numbers on the left side of the photographs in the left-hand column indicate the number of days elapsed following the imbibition treatment.
FIG. 10 shows the results (photographs) obtained by cutting off the hypocotyls of wild-type and KK-strain seedlings on day 7 following the imbibition treatment, transferring the hypocotyls to a hormone-free medium, and culturing them for 14 days.
FIG. 11 shows the results of SDS-PAGE analysis and Western blotting analysis using oleosin S4 antibody and 12S globulin antibody on protein extracts from tissue obtained by cutting off the hypocotyls from wild-type and KK-strain seedlings 7 days after water absorption and cultivating the hypocotyls for 14 days in a hormone-free medium, and from CIM calluses of the wild-type strain.
FIG. 12 is a graph showing the fatty acid composition of lipids extracted from KK strain and wild-type seedlings and from dry seeds of the wild-type strain. In the graph, “KK seedling” represents KK strain seedlings, “Co1-0 seedling” represents wild-type seedlings, “Co1-0 seed” represents wild-type dry seeds. The numbers appended to C indicate the number of carbons and the number of double bonds on the fatty acid.



BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a plant body being constructed so as to be capable of repressing expression of two or more genes coding for two or more proteins, each of the proteins comprises a B3 DNA-binding domain and an EAR motif and has a suppressing activity to suppress function of a sugar-inducible promoter. Having had created plants which are homodeficient for each of the respective genes that encode the two proteins having these characteristics earlier discovered by the inventors (specifically, proteins having a sweet potato sporamin minimal promoter function suppressing activity; more specifically, proteins having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2 or 4), phenotypes in which the genes relating to embryogenesis and the accumulation of storage products are derepressed were found, even though no change whatsoever was observable in the phenotypes of the aforesaid plants homodeficient for one of these genes alone. In other words, these proteins were found to work cooperatively to suppress the expression of genes relating to the embryogenesis and the accumulation of storage products. Therefore, by controlling the expression of these two genes, one should be able to control the operability (period of operation, strength of operation, etc.) of programs for embryogenesis and the accumulation of storage products. For example, it is conceivable that by inhibiting the expression of these two genes, the operation of these programs can be made to begin at other than the normal operating period, or the storage products can be made to accumulate in other than the normal storage organs such as the normal seeds and tubers. Moreover, by inhibiting the expression of these two genes, the embryogenic state is continued. It is thus possible to maintain an undifferentiated state in tissue cultivation (e.g., callus) even without stimulation by plant hormones or the like. The inventive plant body of the present invention thus enables tissue cultivation which both accumulates storage products and has differentiation potency to be readily achieved.
The plant body, plant body production method, method of modifying a program for accumulating storage products in the plant body, method of producing plant storage products, and plant storage product production enhancer serving as different aspect of the invention are described below.
Plant Body
The plant body to which the invention is applied is not subject to any particular limitation, provided it is a higher plant. The invention may be applied to monocotyledons and dicotyledons. In addition to A. thaliana used in the working examples of the invention, other exemplary plants include dicotyledons such as soybean, peanut, sesame, rapeseed, cotton, sunflower, safflower (all oil-storing plants), potato and sweet potato (both starch-storing plants), and monocotyledons such as rice, wheat and millet. Of these, dicotyledons are preferred. Plant bodies may be classified as, for example, starch-storing plants, oil-storing plants or protein-storing plants. Of these, the use of oil-storing plants is preferred. Based on the above, preferred plants to which the invention may be applied include oil-storing plants that are dicotyledons, such as peanut, sesame, rapeseed, cotton, sunflower and safflower. Starch-storing plants that are dicotyledons, such as sweet potato and potato, are also preferred. The storage product in the present invention may be, without particular limitation, an oil, a protein or a starch, although an oil is preferred. In addition, aside from storage products intrinsic to the plant body to which the invention is applied, the storage product may be a protein or other substance from another plant or organism which is encoded by a foreign gene and can be produced in the plant.
As used herein, the term “plant body” includes the plant individual, all types and forms of cells capable of constituting the plant individual, tissues and organs which are a part of the plant individual, and generative cells. The phrase “part of a plant individual” encompasses the reproductive media (seeds, tubers, fruit, cut panicles, etc.).
The genes whose expression is to be regulated in the present invention code for proteins which include a B3 DNA-binding domain specific to the plant and an EAR motif, and which have a sugar-inducible promoter function suppressing activity. Here, “sugar-inducible promoter function suppressing activity” means that some protein has an activity which suppresses the operation of a sugar-inducible promoter within the plant body. Moreover, “function suppressing activity” can mean that some protein has an activity which suppresses the expression of a structural gene that has been bonded so as to be capable of activation by a sugar-inducible promoter. Examples of such proteins are exemplified by transcription repression factors which function as active repressors.
The “sugar-inducible promoter” may be a promoter induced by a sugar selected from among monosaccharides, disaccharides and polysaccharides, such as glucose, sucrose or the like which is normally capable of being used by a plant. The sugar is typically sucrose. Known sugar-inducible promoters include At-β Amy (Arabidopsis thaliana) (Plant Physiol 107, 895-904), ApL3 (A. thaliana) (Plant Physiol 134, 81-91), and patatin (potato) (Plant J 11, 53-62). Examples of sugar-inducible promoters which may serve as indicators for obtaining the protein or gene of the invention include sweet potato sporamin promoter (Plant Mol Biol. 14, 595-604; Plant Physiol 138, 675-685) (NCBI Accession No.: X13509) and the sweet potato sporamin minimal promoter composed of 210 base pairs (Mol Genet Genom 272, 690-699) (SEQ ID NO: 5). The sweet potato sporamin gene encodes a vacuolar protein which is most abundant in tuberous root. The expression of this protein is known to be induced in other plant tissues as well by sugars such as sucrose and glucose. Therefore, when a plant body possesses such a storage product-related sugar-inducible promoter function-suppressing activity, it can be regarded as capable of effectively regulating the embryogenesis program and the storage product accumulation program.
The proteins encoded by the genes whose expression is regulated in the present invention preferably have a B3 DNA-binding domain (Pfam: UK, USA, Accession No: PF02362). Whether or not a given protein has a B3 DNA-binding domain can be determined by the alignment with known B3 DNA-binding domain sequences such as the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 6 obtained in Accession No. PF02362 at the Pfam web site, or the D3 DNA-binding domain (SEQ ID NO: 30) of VIVIPAROUS1 (Vp1) in Zea Maize referenced in Plant Cell 9, 799-807 (1997). More specifically, such a determination can be made by using a known pairwise alignment method between an already known B3 DNA-binding domain sequence and the amino acid sequence of a protein which may possibly have a B3 DNA-binding domain (Dot Matrix), a dynamic programming algorithm (Pairs Block Aligner, BCM Search Launcher, etc.) or a word (such as FASTA or BLAST) or k-double method (e.g., BLAST 2 sequence alignment, FASTA program package), or by using a known multiple alignment method between a known B3 DNA-binding domain sequence and a plurality of possible protein amino acid sequences and/or the amino acid sequence of a known B3 DNA-binding domain protein (ClustalW; HAMMER (hidden Markov model), Multi Alin, mkdom/xdom). The proteins that are the targets of regulation have a homology (degree of identity) therebetween of preferably at least 34%, and more preferably at least 76%.
Based on the relationship between HSI2 and other families of this type, the proteins whose expression is regulated in the present invention may contain a B3 DNA-binding domain having the following characteristics. FIG. 1 shows the results of a sequencing analysis (based on the Clustal program) on the B3 domain protein family in A. thaliana containing RAV1, RAV2, ARF1, ARF3, ABI3 and HSI2. From this multiple alignment, HSI2 may be said to have the following three characteristics. (1) It has the amino acid residue indicated by the bullet below the amino acid sequence. This amino acid residue is the same in the six proteins. (2) It has amino acids of specific qualities (nonpolar or polar (basic or acidic)) at each of the sites denoted by white triangles. (3) It has amino acid residues preserved between the families at the rectangularly enclosed sites in the diagram. It is desirable for the proteins whose expression is regulated in the invention to have one of these characteristics, and preferably above characteristic (1). The proteins more preferably have at least two of the above characteristics, and even more preferably have all of the above characteristics.
The proteins in the invention preferably have an EAR motif (ERF-associated amphiphilic repression motif) (Plant Cell 13, 1959-1968). The EAR motif is on the C-terminus side of the transcription factor proteins. Various types of such EAR motifs have been found, examples of which include those shown in the following table (Biochem Biophys Res Commun 321, 172-178; Trends Plant Sci 11, 109-112; Trends Plant Sci. 11 (3), 109-12 (March 2006)). Sequences which manifest functions similar to these EAR motifs may also be used in the present invention.












TABLE 1







core motif
origin organizms
Ptotein name
Function




















1
DLELRL
Arabidopsis
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein



2
DLDLRL
Arabidopsis
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein


3
DLTLRL
Arabidopsis
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein


4
DLSLRL
Arabidopsis
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein


5
DLSLKL
Arabidopsis
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein


6
DLSLSL
Arabidopsis
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein


7
DLSLHL
Arabidopsis
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein


8
DLTLKL
Arabidopsis
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein


9
CLDLRL
Arabidopsis
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein


10
SLDLHL
Arabidopsis
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein


11
SLDLRL
Arabidopsis
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein


12
NLNLKL
Arabidopsis
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein


13
CLDLSL
Arabidopsis
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein


14
DLNLRL
Zea ramosa
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein
*


15
DLQLRL
Zea ramosa
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein
*


16
DLRLRL
Zea ramosa
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein
*


17
ELELRL
Zea ramosa
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein
*


18
NLELRL
Zea ramosa
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein
*


19
QLELRL
Zea ramosa
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein
*


20
DLELNL
Zea ramosa
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein
*


21
DLELQL
Zea ramosa
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein
*


22
SLELRL
Zea ramosa
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein
*


23
TLELRL
Zea ramosa
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein
*


24
DLELTL
Zea ramosa
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein
*


25
DLELSL
Zea ramosa
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein
*


26
DLHLRL
Zea ramosa
TFIIIA-type zinc-finger protein
*


27
LDLNL
Arabidopsis
NIMIN1
Plant defence (salicylic acid signalling)


28
LDLNV
Rice
NRR
Plant defence (salicylic acid signalling)


29
LDLNL
Arabidopsis
AtERF4
Plant defence (jasmonic acid, ethylene






and abscisic acid signalling)


30
FDLNF
Arabidopsis
AtERF7
Drought stress (abscisic acid signalling)


31
FDLNL
Arabidopsis
ERF3
Wound signalling


32
LDLSL
Arabidopsis
ZAT12
Cold and oxidative stress


33
FDLNI
Arabidopsis
ZAT10
Drought, salt and cold stress


34
IDLNL
Arabidopsis
AZF2
Drought stress


35
LDLNL
Tobacco
NbCD1
Hypersensitive cell death


36
PDLNL
Arabidopsis
AtMYB4
UV stress


37
LXLXL
Arabidopsis
AUX/IAA
Auxin signalling


38
IDLNS
Arabidopsis
HSI2
Sugar signalling


39
FDLNI
Tobacco
ZFT1
Spermine signalling


40
LDLNL
Catharanthus roseus
ZCT1
Secondary metabolism


41
LDLNL
Catharanthus roseus
ZCT2
Secondary metabolism


42
FDLNL
Catharanthus roseus
ZCT3
Secondary metabolism


43
FDLNI
Petunia
ZPT2-3
Drought tolerance


44
IDLNSDP
Arabidopsis
B3DNA binding protein HSI2, HSI2-L1


45
LDLNFKP
Arabidopsis
B3DNA binding protein HSI2-L2


46
IDLNSQP
Arabidopsis
B3DNA binding protein OsHSI2


47
IDLNLAP
Arabidopsis
ClassII ERF3


48
FDLNFPP
Arabidopsis
ClassII AtERF3


49
LDLNRPP
Arabidopsis
ClassII OsERF3


50
FDLNIPP
Arabidopsis
Zn-Finger ZAT10


51
IDLNLP
Arabidopsis
Zn-Finger ZAT1


52
FDLNIPP
Arabidopsis
Zn-Finger WZF1





* includes artificial desgined sequence


1~26 are selected from Biochem. Biophysi. Res. Comu. (321)172-178, 27~43 are selected from Trends Plant Sci. 2006Mar 11(3)109-12, and 44~52 are selected from Plant Pysiol., 2005 June (138)675-685.






The proteins in the invention are exemplified by the following two types of proteins. The first protein is a protein having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2 (HSI2), and the second protein is a protein having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 4 (HSI2-L1; HSL1). These proteins are both transcription factor proteins (HSI2 and HSI2-L2 (HSL1)) found to be active repressors of sweet potato sporamin minimal promoters in A. thaliana. 
Other first proteins include proteins which have an amino acid sequence with, in the amino acid sequence of HSI2, one or more substituted, deleted, inserted and/or added amino acid, and which have an activity of the same nature as HSI2. Other second proteins include proteins which have an amino acid sequence with, in the amino acid sequence of HSI2-L1 (HSL1), one or more substituted, deleted, inserted and/or added amino acid, and which have an activity of the same nature as HSI2-L1 (HSL1). “Activity of the same nature” refers herein to an activity which is identical in nature. The activities may be lower or higher than those of the proteins having the amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NO: 2 and SEQ ID NO: 4, respectively. Such activities can be detected by, for example, having a plant body possessing an expression cassette obtained by binding a suitable reporter gene to a sweet potato sporamin minimal promoter express the protein, and determining whether such reporter gene expression is repressed in the presence of a sugar.
An example of a method for preparing DNA which codes for a protein having a modified amino acid sequence that is familiar to those skilled in the art is the site-directed mutagenesis method (Kramer W & Fritz H-J: Methods Enzymol 154, 350 (1987)). Even in the natural world, changes can arise in the amino acid sequence of a protein due to mutations in the base sequence coding for the protein. It is thus desirable for even proteins having an amino acid sequence with, in the amino acid sequence of the natural protein, one or more substituted, deleted, inserted and/or added amino acid, to have an activity of the same nature as the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2 or 4.
Examples of other first proteins include proteins which are coded by DNA that hybridizes under stringent conditions to DNA having the base sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or to a part of a complementary strand thereto, and which have an activity of the same nature as HSI2. Examples of other second proteins include proteins which are coded by DNA that hybridizes under stringent conditions to DNA having the base sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3 or to a part of a complementary strand thereto, and which have an activity of the same nature as HSI2-L1 (HSL1). The base sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 is a base sequence which codes for HSI2, and the base sequence of SEQ ID NO: 3 is a base sequence which codes for HSI2-L1 (HSL1).
Methods for obtaining such other proteins include techniques involving the use of hybridization (Southern E M: J Mol Biol 98, 503 (1975)) or the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Saiki R K, et al: Science 230, 1350 (1985); Saiki R K, et al.: Science 239, 487 (1988)). That is, obtaining such a protein by using as the probe DNA which codes for a protein having the amino acid sequence of HSI2 or a protein having the amino acid sequence of HSI2-L1 (HSL1), or a portion of such DNA or a complementary strand thereof, or by using as the primer an oligonucleotide which hybridizes specifically with the base sequence of genomic DNA for such a protein, in order to isolate from A. thaliana or some other plant DNA which codes for protein having an activity of the same nature as HSI1 or HSI2-L1 (HSL1) is within a range that can be ordinarily carried out by persons skilled in the art.
DNA coding for such a protein may preferably be obtained by carrying out a hybridization reaction under stringent conditions. In the present reaction, “stringent hybridization conditions” refers to the hybridization conditions 6 M urea, 0.4% SDS, 0.5×SSC, or hybridization conditions of comparable stringency. Under conditions of higher stringency, such as 6 M urea, 0.4% SDS and 0.1×SSC, it is expected that DNA having a higher homology can be isolated. “High homology” refers herein to a sequence homology which, over the entire amino acid sequence, is at least 50%, preferably at least 70%, more preferably at least 90%, and most preferably at least 95%.
The homology of the amino acid sequence or base sequence can be determined using the algorithm BLAST created by Karlin and Altschul (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 2264-2268 (1990); Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 5873 (1993)). Programs called BLASTN and BLASTX have been developed based on the BLAST algorithm (Altschul SF, et al.: J Mol Biol 215, 403 (1990)). Specific techniques for these methods of analysis are commonly known.
The plant body of the invention is constructed in such a way that expression of a gene coding for HSI2 or a protein substantially identical to HSI2 or a gene coding for HSI2-L1 (HSL1) or a protein substantially identical to HSI2-L1 (HSL1) can be repressed. Here, the gene coding for HSI2 or a protein substantially identical to HSI2 or for HSI2-L1 (HSL1) or a protein substantially identical with HSI2-L1 (HSL1) includes genes that are normally present in the plant body, as well as genes that are retained on a chromosome by some means such as gene manipulation, crossing or mutation. In the plant body of the invention, so long as the expression of both a gene coding for the first protein and a gene coding for the second protein is repressed, the repressed proteins may be merely one of each type or may be a combination of two or more of each type.
Various techniques may be used to construct a plant body in which the expression of two or more genes is repressed in this way. In the invention, “repressing the expression of a gene” encompasses repressing gene transcription, repressing translation to a protein and the expression of incomplete proteins. In all of these forms, aside from complete repression or mutation, partial repression or mutation within a range capable of modifying operation of the embryogenesis program or storage protein accumulation program is acceptable. The plant body in which gene expression is repressed may be the entire plant body or a portion thereof.
The method of repressing the expression of two or more specific genes in the plant may involve, for example, crossing or gene manipulation. Plant bodies obtained by crossing are plant bodies obtained by natural or artificial fertilization and seed formation between plants deficient for one or two or more genes. Plant bodies obtained by genetic manipulation are plant bodies regenerated from plant cells in which specific genes have been knocked out, or from plant cells in which a nucleic acid construct capable of repressing expression targeted at mRNA has been introduced and retained using, for example, an antisense, cosuppression, RNA interference or ribozyme method. In the present invention, the repression of gene expression by a cause present within the target gene due to, for example, defect or mutation of the target gene by crossing, knockout or the like is referred to as the repression of gene expression by an intrinsic factor, and the repression of gene expression by a cause other than one present in the target gene due to an antisense, cosuppression, RNA interference, ribozyme or other method is referred to as the repression of gene expression by an extrinsic factor. Techniques that may be used in the invention to repress the expression of two or more genes are not limited to the methods mentioned above.
The antisense method may repress gene expression by any of a number of actions, such as inhibiting the start of transcription due to triplex formation, inhibiting transcription, and inhibiting splicing. Examples include an antisense sequence complementary to a nontranslational region near the 5′ end of the gene mRNA, an antisense sequence complementary to a coding region or to a nontranslational region on the 3′ side, and an antisense sequence on a nontranslational region sequence. DNA coding for such an antisense sequence can be introduced into the plant body by a known method in a form that is ligated downstream from a promoter, and preferably where a sequence containing a transcription termination signal is coupled to the 3′ side. The antisense DNA sequence is preferably a sequence which is complementary to an intrinsic gene of the plant to be transformed, or a portion of such an intrinsic gene, although complete complementarity is not essential so long as gene expression can be effectively repressed. The transcribed RNA has a complementarity with respect to the target gene transcription product of preferably at least 90%, and most preferably at least 95%. To effectively repress expression of the target gene using an antisense sequence, it is desirable for the antisense sequence to have a length of at least 15 bases, preferably at least 100 bases, and more preferably at least 500 bases.
The RNA interference (RNAi) method, in order to repress expression of the DNA of the present invention in the plant body by RNAi, is able to use DNA of the invention (e.g., the DNA of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 3) or two-stranded RNA having a sequence similar thereto (Chuang C F & Meyerowitz E M: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4985 (2000)). The gene used in the RNAi method does not need to be exactly identical to the target gene, although it is desirable for the sequence homology to be at least 70%, preferably at least 80%, more preferably at least 90% and most preferably at least 95%. The sequence homology can be determined by the above-described technique.
Cosuppression is a suppression of expression by a target gene that arises due to the transformation of DNA having a sequence which is the same as or similar to the target gene sequence. Cosuppression is even observed in plants (Smyth D R: Curr Biol 7, R793 (1997); Martienssen R: Curr Biol 6, 810 (1996)). For example, to obtain a plant body in which expression of the DNA of the invention has been repressed by cosuppression, vector DNA created so as to be able to express the DNA of the present invention (e.g., the DNA of SEQ ID NO: 1 or 3) or DNA having a sequence similar thereto is transformed to the target plant, following which the resulting plant bodies are compared with wild-type plant bodies and those plants in which root elongation has been suppressed are selected. The gene used in cosuppression need not be exactly identical to the target gene, although it is desirable for the sequence homology to be at least 70%, preferably at least 80%, more preferably at least 90%, and most preferably at least 95%. The homology of the sequence can be determined by the technique described above.
In the ribozyme method, although there also exist large ribozymes composed of more than 400 nucleotides, such as group I intron ribozyme and the M1 RNA within RNase P, use may be made of the active domains composed of about 40 nucleotides known as the hammerhead ribozyme and the hairpin ribozyme (Koizumi M and Otsuka E: Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso (Protein Nucleic Acid and Enzyme)) 35, 2191 (1990)). Sequences which function as a hammerhead ribozyme or a hairpin ribozyme may be used (Koizumi M, et al.: FEBS Lett 228, 228 (1988); Koizumi M, et al.: FEBS Lett 239, 285 (1988); Koizumi M and Otsuka E: Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso (Protein Nucleic Acid and Enzyme) 35, 2191 (1990); Koizumi M, et al.: Nucl Acids Res 17, 7059 (1989); Buzayan J M: Nature 323, 349 (1986); Kikuchi Y & Sasaki N: Nucl Acids Res 19, 6751 (1991); Kikuchi Y: Kagaku to Seibutsu (Chemistry and Biology) 30, 112 (1992)). DNA coding for a ribozyme can be introduced into the plant body by linking it to, for example, a promoter such as the 35S promoter of the cauliflower mosaic virus and a transcription termination sequence (Taira K, et al.: Protein Eng 3, 733 (1990); Dzianott A M & Bujarski J J: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86, 4823 (1989); Grosshans C A & Cech T R: Nucl Acids Res 19, 3875 (1991); Taira K, et al.: Nucl Acids Res 19, 5125 (1991)).
The plant body of the present invention is constructed so as to repress or be capable of repressing the expression of the genes coding for the above proteins. This plant body of the invention is able to increase the level of expression of sugar-induced late embryogenesis genes. In A. thaliana, an increase in the level of expression of such genes is observed; on account of this form of expression, an embryogenic state forms, which appears to promote the synthesis and accumulation of storage products in seeds, etc. The plant body of the invention is also able to increase the level of expression by genes coding for sugar-induced storage product-related proteins and by transcription factor genes that positively regulate genes coding for such storage product-related proteins, while at the same time reducing the level of expression of photosynthesis-related genes. Such expression trends are observed in A. thaliana. Owing to this form of expression, it appears that the synthesis and accumulation of storage products is promoted in the presence of sugar.
In a case where the plant body of the invention is all or part of a plant individual, in one embodiment, the plant body accumulates a storage product such as an oil at a site other than the normal storage organ under sugar induction. For example, the plant body may be a seedling individual which accumulates the storage product in the hypocotyl. Furthermore, in the case with the plant body being a seed, which is a reproductive material, it may accumulate a storage product such as oil in the hypocotyl of the seedling individual under sugar induction following germination. In a case where the plant body of the invention is cultivated tissue such as a callus, because propagation can be carried out while maintaining an embryogenic state, use in a tissue culture or cell culture that produces the storage product is possible.
When the plant body of the invention is Arabidopsis thaliana or is derived from this plant species, gene expression can be regulated in such a way that the level of expression of genes coding for sugar-induced storage product-related proteins and of transcription factor genes that positively regulate genes coding for such storage product-related proteins increases, which genes are shown in Table 1, and the level of expression of photosynthesis-related genes shown in the table decreases. It is thus possible to promote the production of proteins encoded by these genes and of products synthesized with these proteins. In addition, by using a nucleic acid construct in which genes coding for extrinsic proteins are ligated downstream from the promoters for these genes, it is also possible to have proteins or other products from other plant bodies or organisms be expressed in the plant body.
Method of Producing a Plant Body, and Method of Modifying a Program for Accumulating Storage Product in a Plant Body
The method herein of producing the plant body includes the step of manufacturing a plant body which is capable of repressing the expression of the above-mentioned two or more genes, which manufacturing step is carried out, as described above, by crossing plant individuals or by genetic manipulation. Furthermore, the method herein of modifying a program for accumulating a storage product in a plant body includes a step in which a plant body which is capable of repressing the expression of the above-mentioned two or more genes is modified, which step is part of the above manufacturing step that is carried out in the foregoing method of producing a plant body. The plant body modifying step includes a step in which crossing or genetic manipulation are only carried out within a range where seeds or plant individuals are not ultimately regenerated by such crossing or genetic manipulation.
The step of manufacturing the plant body of the present invention by crossing is a step in which plant bodies having defects or mutations at one or two or more genes are crossed, and the seeds thereof are obtained. The step of manufacturing the plant body of the present invention by gene manipulation is a step that involves building a nucleic acid construct capable of repressing the expression of two or more genes (such as by a knockout, antisense, RNAi, ribozyme or cosuppression method), introducing the construct into plant cells, and regenerating the plant body from the plant cells. Vectors which may be used to transform the plant cells are not subject to any particular limitation, provided they have the ability to express the inserted gene within the cell. For example, use may be made of a vector having a promoter for constantly expressing the gene within the plant cells (e.g., the 35S promoter of the cauliflower mosaic virus), or a vector having a promoter which is inductively activated by an external stimulus.
The cell into which the nuclei acid construct is introduced includes all types of plant cells which are capable of regeneration into a plant body. Illustrative examples include sections of specific organs, such as cultured cells, protoplasts, shoot primordia, polyblasts, capillary roots, calluses or leaves. By carrying out a specific regeneration step, the plant transformant is able to transform the cell into a plant body. Although the method of regeneration differs with the type of plant, various known methods may be used.
Any of various methods known to those skilled in the art, such as the polyethylene glycol method, electroporation, an agrobacterium-mediated method or the particle gun method may be used to introduce the nucleic acid construct into the plant cells. In the particle gun method, use may be made of the system available from Bio-Rad Laboratories. Regeneration of the plant body from a transformant cell may be carried out by a method known to those skilled in the art, in accordance with the type of plant cell. Also, progeny may be obtained from the regenerated plant body by sexual or asexual reproduction. Moreover, it is possible to obtain reproductive materials (e.g., seeds, fruit, cut panicles, tubers, tuberous roots, rootstock, calluses, protoplast) from such plant bodies and their progeny, or clones thereof, and mass produce such plant bodies based on these.
A number of techniques have already been established and are in wide use in the technical field of the invention. For example, techniques for creating transformed plant bodies in A. thaliana include the vacuum method (Bechtold, N. & Pelletier, G: Methods Mol. Biol. 82, 259-266 (1998)) and the floral dip method (Clough, S. J. & Bent, A. F.: Plant J. 16, 735-743 (1998)), and techniques for creating transformed plant bodies in poplar include a method which uses Agrobacterium (Leple, J. C. et al.: Plant Cell Rep. 11, 137-141 (1992)). Techniques for creating transformed plant bodies in rice include a method that involves introducing a gene into a protoplast using polyethylene glycol, and regenerating a plant body (indica type rice varieties are suitable) (Datta S K: in Gene Transfer to Plants (Potrykus I and Spangenberg, Eds), pp. 66-74 (1995)); a method that entails introducing a gene into protoplast by electrical pulses, and regenerating a plant body (japonica type rice varieties are suitable) (Toki S, et al.: Plant Physiol 100, 1503 (1992)); a method which involves introducing a gene directly into a cell by the particle gun technique, and generating a plant body (Christou P, et al.: Biotechnology 9, 957 (1991)), and a method that involves introducing a gene via Agrobacterium, and regenerating a plants body (Hiei Y, et al.: Plant J 6, 271 (1994)). Advantageous use of these methods may be made in the present invention.
Method of Producing Plant Storage Products
In the plant body of the invention, by repressing the expression of the above-mentioned two or more genes, the embryogenesis program or the storage product accumulation program is initiated under sugar induction. With the initiation of these programs, at least embryogenesis is initiated and maintained or the synthesis and accumulation of storage products is initiated and maintained. As shown in the subsequently described examples, in A. thaliana, embryogenesis and oil synthesis and accumulation are initiated at the time of germination. In a callus culture, together with oil synthesis and accumulation, an embryogenic state can be maintained even without plant hormone stimulation. Accordingly, plant storage products can be produced by growing or propagating the plant body of the invention.
Plant Storage Product Production Enhancer
The plant storage product production enhancer of the invention is a nucleic acid construct which represses the expression of the above described two or more genes. As already explained above, such a nucleic acid construct is introduced into the plant body by genetic manipulation so as to obtain a transformed plant body, and is thus able to promote the accumulation and production of plant storage products.
EXAMPLES
The invention is described more fully below in the following examples, which are illustrative and should not be construed as limiting the invention.
First, the materials and methods used in the following examples are described.
Materials and Methods
1. Plant Materials
Mouse-ear cress (Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynhold, Co1-0 ecotype; referred to below simply as “wild type”) was used as the plant material. The mutant line ΔHSI2 (hsi2-2) from a wild type background was acquired from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC) at the SALK Institute (La Jolla, Calif.). In addition, ΔHSI2-L1 (hsl1-1), which is a transformed line (SALK—059568) obtained by inserting T-DNA in the No. 12 exon of the HSI2-L1 (HSL1) gene, was acquired from the SALK Institute.
2. Growing the Plants
The surfaces of the seeds were sterilized with a sterilizing solution composed of 0.025% TritonX-100 and 5% NaClO and rinsed from 3 to 5 times with sterilized water, following which, unless noted otherwise, the seeds were sown on a plate containing a medium of Gamborg B-5 vitamin (100 mg/L myoinositol, 10 mg/L thiamine hydrochloride, 1 mg/L nicotinic acid, 1 mg/L pyridoxine hydrochloride; Gamborg et al., 1968), 2.5 mM Mes-KOH (pH 5.7 to 5.8), 1% sucrose-containing MS inorganic salt (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) to which 0.3% gellite was added for solidification. To break the dormancy of the seeds, following 2 to 5 days of incubation at 4° C. in the dark, the seeds were transferred to a growth cabinet (Sanyo) at 22° C. under continuous lighting at an intensity of 40 to 50 E/m2s and grown.
To obtain progeny seed, plants grown for about two weeks on the plate were transferred to a pot containing vermiculite, and grown in a plant growth cabinet (Sanyo) at 22° C. and under continuous lighting. Hyponex (Hyponex Japan) diluted from 2,000 to 5.000-fold with tap water was suitably applied as liquid fertilizer.
A medium prepared by adding 0.86 μM indoleacetic acid (IAA) and 2.5 μM N6-(Δ2-isopentenyl)-adenine (2iP) to a basic medium was used as a shoot-inducing medium (SIM). A medium prepared by adding 2.3 μM 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4D) and 0.46 μM kinetin to a basic medium was used as a callus-inducing medium (CIM).
3. Examination of Plant Body Sections
An entire seedling on day 5 following an imbibition treatment was fixed with a water/ethanol/acetic acid/formalin solution (20:18:1:1, v/v) FAA for 16 hours at 4° C., then dehydrated by increasing the ethanol concentration in stages. Next, the sample was encapsulated using Technobit 7100 (Kulzur Wehrheim, Germany), in accordance with the protocol provided. The encapsulated sample was sectioned to a thickness of 0.5 μm using an RM2125RT rotary microtome (Leica; Wein, Austria) equipped with a tungsten knife, and the sections were dried on cover glasses. The sections were then stained with 0.05% Toluidine Blue (Merck; Darmstadt, Germany) for 1 minute at room temperature, following which they were promptly rinsed with water for 5 minutes, and examined under a microscope (BX60; Olympus, Tokyo).
4. Genotyping of T-DNA Insertion Mutant Line
The extraction of genomic DNA for genotyping and the determination of T-DNA insertion sites in Δhsi2 (hsi2-2) and Δhsi2-L1 (hsl1-1) were carried out as follows.
4-1. Genomic DNA Extraction
The genomic DNA was extracted by placing one leaf cut from the plant body into a microtube (Yasui Kikai) in which 40 μL of 0.4 N NaOH had been placed, adding a magnetic metal cone, and carrying 5 seconds of disruption twice in a Multibead Shocker (Yasui Kikai). The disruptate was neutralized by adding 200 μL of 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), then centrifuged at 4° C. and 2,000 rpm. The resulting supernatant was used as the genomic DNA solution in the PCR reaction. Genomic DNA for DNA sequencing was extracted by the CTAB method, thereby increasing the purity of the template DNA in PCR reaction. That is, 2 g of the plant body was disrupted by freezing, after which 5 mL of CTAB buffer (1.42 M NaCl, 20 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), 0.25 mM polyvinylpyrrolidone, 52.9 mM cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide) was added and the mixture was incubated at 55° C. for 30 minutes. Next, 5 mL of chloroform was added and the sample was immersed therein at room temperature for 30 minutes, following which 10 minutes of centrifugation was carried out at 3,000 rpm. The resulting supernatant was used as a pure DNA solution in a PCR reaction.
4-2. Determination of T-DNA Insertion Sites in T-DNA Insertion Mutant Strains ΔHSI2 (hsi2-2) and ΔHSI2-L1 (hsii-1)
Genomic DNA was extracted by a method that used the above-mentioned Bead Shocker, following which determinations of the T-DNA insertion sites in the T-DNA insertion mutant strains ΔHSI2 (hsi2-2) and ΔHSI2-L1 (hsl1-1) were carried out using a HSI2 gene specific primer, an HSI-L1 (HSL1) gene specific primer and a T-DNA specific primer. FIG. 2 shows the T-DNA insertion sites and the positions of the primers on the HSI2 gene and the HSI2-L1 (HSL1) gene.
The primer sets a to d had the following structures. Determinations of the T-DNA insertion sites on the HSI2 gene and the HSI2-L1 (HSL1) gene were carried out by DNA sequencing (separately described) PCR products obtained using, respectively, primer set b and primer set d.








Primer set a:



S08-f;



5′-GTATCACCAGCCTGTAGCATCATGGAC-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 7)


 


S08-r;



5′-AGGCAGCTAATGCTGGAGACATGCAG-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 8)


 


Primer set b:



S08-f;



5′-GTATCACCAGCCTGTAGCATCATGGAC-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 7)


 


PL11;



5′-TTTCGCCTGCTGGGGCAAACCAG-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 9)


 


Primer set c:



S054;



5′-AAGCATCACACTGCACCCATTGCT-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 10)


 


S05-r;



5′-TCGGAACATTGGGACTAAGAGCAAG-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 11)


 


Primer set d:



S05-f;



5′-AAGCATCACACTGCACCCATTGCT-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 10)


 


PL11;



5′-TTTCGCCTGCTGGGGCAAACCAG-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 9)






In the DNA sequencing performed to elucidate T-DNA insertion site determinations, a Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit v3.1 (available from Applied Biosystems) was used to carry out the sequencing reactions and a Capillary Sequencer ABI Prism 3100 (available from the same company) was used to determine the DNA sequences of the sequencing reaction products by electrophoresis.
6. Microarray Analysis
Total RNA was extracted from wild-type and KK line seedling plants on day 4 following the imbibition treatment, following which Cy3- and Cy5-labeled cRNA probes were prepared using Agilent's Low RNA Input Fluorescent Linear Amplification Kit (Agilent Technology; Palo Alto, Calif.) in accordance with the protocol provided, and hybridization with Agilent Arabidopsis3 oligo Microarray was carried out. In microarray analysis, hybridization was carried out for each of two independent RNA extracts. Signal detection, analysis and normalization following the total of two hybridizations were carried out using Feature Extractor (Version A.7.5.1; Agilent Technology). Raw data on the microarrays and details on the cRNA labeling and hybridization experiments were registered with the public microarray database Arrayexpress under Accession No. E-MEXP-542 (although this data was not yet open to the public at the time the present patent application was filed).
7. Expression Analysis by Quantitative RT-PCR
Single-stranded cDNA for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was prepared by SUPERSCRIPT III (Invitrogen) using an oligo(dT) 20 primer from 5 μg of total RNA, then diluted 10-fold with Rnase-free water. RT-PCR was carried out in 25 μL of reaction solution with 5 μL of diluted cDNA template solution, 12.5 μL of Cybergreen dye set mixed solution (Bio-Rad) and 0.5 μL each of the gene-specific primers (final concentration, 200 nM). The reaction was carried out under the following conditions: 95° C., 5 minutes (15 seconds at 95° C., 15 seconds at 60° C., 30 seconds at 72° C.), 40 cycles. The relative mRNA level was calculated based on the Ct method. ACT2 was used as the internal standard gene. The primer sets used in each reaction are shown below. The sequences cited in Mendoza et al. (2005) were used for oleosin S3, At2S3, LEC1 and LEC2.








ACT2-



Forward;



5′-CTGTTGACTACGAGCAGGAGATGGA-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 12)


 


Reverse;



5′-GACTTCTGGGCATCTGAATCTCTCA-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 13)


 


HSI2



Forward;



5′-CTTCCATATCAGCTTGAAACTCTC-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 14)


 


Reverse;



5′-TGGCTCAAGACGCCAGTGATGTTT-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 15)


 


HSI2-L1(HSL1)



Forward;



5′-ATGAGGCTTCTCCAAGCTGCAGCGT-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 16)


 


Reverse;



5′-GAACCGTGTTCTGTGCTGACCATAT-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 17)


 


LHCB2:4



5′-GTAA AGGT CCGA TCGA AAAT CTGT-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 18)


 


5′-TTAT CCGA TCAA ACTC TATT TTCCG-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 19)


 


Oleosin S3



Forward;



5′-AGGCAGATTGCTAAAGCTGCAAC-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 20)


 


Reverse;



5′-ACTGTGATGAGAGCCGGG-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 21)


 


At2S3



Forward;



5′-AGCAAAACATGGCTAACAAGCTCT-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 22)


 


Reverse;



5′-CTGGCATCTCTGTCTTGGACCT-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 23)


 


LEC1



Forward;



5′-ACCAGCTCAGTCGTAGTAGCC-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 24)


 


Reverse;



5′-GTGAGACGGTAAGGTTTTACGCATGAT-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 25)


 


LEC2



Forward;



5′-CTCTCTCTCTCTCCGGGAAA-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 26)


 


Reverse;



5′-CCATCTGCTCCACCGGGTAT-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 27)


 


WRI1



Forward;



5′-TCTTTGGGACAAAAGCTCTTGGAATTCGAT-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 28)


 


Reverse;



5′-TACGTATGTGCTGCTGCTTCTIVACT-3′
(SEQ ID NO: 29)






8. SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting
SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and Western blotting using oleosin S4 and 12S Globulin antibodies were carried out in accordance with Shimada et al. (J. Biol. Chem. 278, 32292-32299 (2003)). Wild-type dry seeds, seedlings and detached hypocotyls were disrupted in an extraction buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.05% SDS, 5% mercaptoethanol and 10% glycerol. The disruptate was incubated at 95° C. for 5 minutes, then centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatant was submitted to SDS-PAGE and subsequently transferred to a polydifluorovinylidene membrane (0.45 mm; Nihon Millipore, Tokyo) using a semidry-type transfer apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories). The membrane following transfer was incubated in a 5% (w/v) skim milk-containing buffer of 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.14 M NaCl and 0.05% (w/v) Toriton-X100, then incubated for 1 hour in anti-12S globulin antibody (20.000-fold dilution) or anti-oleosin S4 antibody (10.000-fold dilution). Next, horseradish peroxidase-labeled anti-rabbit IgG antibody (5.000-fold dilution; GE Healthcare Bio-Science; Piscataway, N.J.) was used as a secondary antibody. Signals were detected using ECL Western Blotting Detection Reagent (GE Healthcare Bio-science).
9. Fat Red 7B Staining
Tissue staining using Fat Red 7B was carried out in accordance with the method of Brundrett et al. (1991). Fat Red 7B (0.1% (w/v); Sigma) was dissolved in polyethylene glycol (average molecular weight, 400 D, Sigma; St. Louis, Mo.) for 1 hour at 90° C., then mixed with an equal volume of 90% (v/v) glycerol, and the resulting mixture was used as the staining solution. The tissue sample in this staining solution was incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. Next, it was rinsed several times with water, after which it was mounted on a slide glass with glycerol and examined under a microscope (SZX12, OLYMPUS).
10. Lipid Analysis
To analyze triacylglycerol (TAG), 20 mg of tissue was disrupted in 1 mL of a chloroform/methanol mixture (2:1, v/v), and centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 5 minutes. The supernatant was evaporated to dryness, then re-dissolved in 20 μL of chloroform. This lipid sample was spotted onto a silica gel 60F254 HPTLC sheet (Merck) and developed using hexane/diethyl ether/acetic acid mixture (4:1:0.05, v/v) as the developing solvent. Pure glycerol trilinolenic acid (Sigma) was developed at the same time as a TAG standard sample. Sulfuric acid was coated onto the HPTLC sheet following development, following which the sheet was heated at 120° C. for 5 minutes to visualize the lipid.
Example 1
Isolation of Double Knockout Mutant Strains of HSI2 and HSI2-L1 (HSL1)
A T-DNA homoinsertion line was selected by genomic PCR from a mutant line (SALK—059568) obtained by inserting T-DNA at the No. 12 exon of the HSI2-L1 (HSL1) gene. Compared with the wild type, the homoinsertion line had a markedly lower amount of HSI2-L1 (HSL1) mRNA. Based on this result, the T-DNA insertion mutant line was called ΔHSI2-L1 (hsl1-1). ΔHSI2-L1 (hsl1-1) plant bodies had no conspicuous anomalies and exhibited growth similar to that of the wild-type strain.
Next, F1 seeds obtained by crossing a ΔHSI2 (hsi2-2) homo line plant with a ΔSI2-L1 (hsl1-1) homo line plant were allowed to self-pollinate, giving F2 plants, from which F3 plants were subsequently obtained. Of the 144 F3 plants obtained, eight individuals were abnormal seedlings which stopped growing in 9 days. This implied that double mutants for ΔHSI2 (hsi2-2) and ΔHSI2-L1 (hsl1-1) are abnormal seedlings. Hence, Δhsi2−/−/Δhsi2-11+/− and Δhsi2+/−/Δhsi2-11−/− genotype plants were selected by genomic PCR, and respectively allowed to self-pollinate, giving the offspring plants. In the former, 62 out of 252 individuals (X2 value for 3:1 ratio=0.085, p≧0.05) exhibited abnormal phenotypes, and in the latter, 35 out of 134 individuals (X2 value for 3:1 ratio=0.09, p ≧0.05) exhibited abnormal phenotypes. The genotype of the abnormal seedlings was Δhsi2−/−/Δhsi2-11−/−; hence, when a plant had at least one wild-type HSI2 or HSI2-L1 (HSL1), it grew normally in the same way as a wild-type plant.
FIG. 3 shows the results obtained when RT-PCR was carried out on these mutants and the amount of mRNA was determined. As shown in FIG. 3, in a double mutant (KK strain) having the genotype Δhsi2−/−/Δhsi2-11−/−, given that the quantities of HSI2 mRNA and HSI2-L1 (HSL1) mRNA were both very small, the amount of these genes transcribed was found to have greatly decreased. Because the frequency with which abnormal seedlings arose was about the same in the offspring of Δhsi2−/−/Δhsi2-11+/− and Δhsi2+/−/Δhsi2-11−/−, the abnormal seedling phenotypes did not appear to be due to mutations of genes other than HSI2 and HSI2-L1 (HSL1). From the above, the abnormal seedling phenotypes in the KK strain appear to be due to a decrease in the level of expression of HSI2 and HSI2-L1 (HSL1), judging from which HSI2 and HSI2-L1 (HSL1) appear to mutually complement the functions essential for growth of the seedlings.
Example 2
Detailed Analysis of the Phenotypes of Double Mutant Strains
To observe the growth of double mutant strain seedlings, Δhsi2−/−/Δhsi2-11+/− and Δhsi2+/−/Δhsi2-11−/− progeny plant seeds were germinated in a 1% sucrose-containing agar medium. In wild-type A. thaliana, root hairs developed on day 3 after imbibition treatment (FIG. 4, top row in right-hand column), a green cotyledon opened up on day 5 (FIG. 4, second row in right-hand column), and the roots elongated a considerable degree on day 7 (FIG. 4, third row in right-hand column). Also, surface unevenness was not observed in the wild-type hypocotyls (FIG. 4, bottom row in right-hand column). By contrast, in the KK strain, because a distinctive retardation of the development of the root hairs and the opening of the cotyledon were observed (FIG. 4, top row and second row in left-hand column), these seedlings were distinguishable from seedlings of other genotypes on days 3 to 5 after imbibition treatment. Also, in the KK strain, on day 5 following the imbibition treatment, the hypocotyls thickened (FIG. 4, row 2 in left-hand column); on day 7 following the imbibition treatment, the hypocotyls became light yellow in color and came to acquire an uneven surface (FIG. 4, row 3 in left-hand column). Also, on day 9, the thickened, uneven-surfaced hypocotyls became yellow in color and callus-like, along with which growth in most of the KK strain had stopped at this stage (FIG. 4, row 4 and bottom row in left-hand column). In addition, individuals with 3 cotyledons appeared in 8 to 15% of the KK mutant strains. This suggests that the KK strain has some defect in development.
Sections of the wild type and the KK strain hypocotyls prepared on day 5 following the imbibition treatment were stained with Toluidine Blue and examined, whereupon epidermal cells in the KK strain were found to be small and irregularly divided. A similar tendency was observed also in root cross-sections.
By contrast, in most KK strains that were allowed to germinate in a sucrose-free medium, on about day 5 following the imbibition treatment, although a green cotyledon had opened up in the same way as in the wild type, the root showed substantially no growth. Moreover, in most KK strains, growth had stopped at this stage. Thickening of the hypocotyl was not observed. KK strains that germinated in soil took on a form similar to those which germinated in a sucrose-free medium. It was learned from the above that the KK strain seedling phenotype in which the hypocotyl thickens is strongly dependent on the external supply of sucrose. That is, HSI2 and HSI2-L1 (HSL1) were found to have the role of suppressing hypocotyl thickening that arises under sugar induction.
Example 3
Microarray Analysis
A microarray analysis on the wild-type strain and the KK strain was carried out in order to investigate genes in which the expression level is affected by a double deficiency for ΔHSI2 (hsi2-2) and ΔHSI2-L1 (hsl1-1). The total RNA was extracted from KK mutant seedlings (on day 4 after imbibition treatment) in which hypocotyl thickening did not arise. The same procedure was followed as described above in “6. Microarray Analysis” under “Materials and Methods.” In two arrays (Agilent Arabidopsis3 oligo Microarray) in which a probe for the 37685 gene of A. thaliana had been fixed, 856 genes were present for which the level of expression in the KK strain was at least twice that in the wild type strain, and 40 genes were present for which the level of expression was at least 30 times higher than in the wild type. Genes for which the level of expression in the KK strain decreased were also present. FIG. 5 shows the group of genes for which the level of expression in the KK strain increased 30-fold, and FIG. 6 shows the group of genes for which the expression level decreased to 1⁄5th or less.
In FIG. 5, genes relating to oil storage proteins are underlined, genes relating to seed storage proteins are italicized, and the transcription factors are marked by asterisks. As is apparent from FIG. 5, in the KK strain, storage protein related genes and the group of genes for which the level of expression increases in late embryogenesis showed a marked increase in the level of expression. That is, in addition to five oleosins which exhibit seed-specific expression and four 2S albumins (at2S1, at2S2, at2S4, at2S5) which are seed storage proteins, the level of expression of the LEC1-like and bZIP67 (DPBF2) transcription factors which are important transcription factors in embryogenesis and which positively regulate seed storage proteins also rose markedly. Furthermore, the level of expression of the transcription regulator factors FUS3, ABI3, bZIP12 and WRI1, which are keys to the development program for middle to late embryogenesis, increased from about 5-fold to about 8-fold.
Also, as shown in FIG. 6, although genes for which the level of expression falls to 1/30th the expression level in the wild-type strain were not present in the KK strain, genes relating to photosynthesis were included in the gene group for which the expression level had markedly decreased (underlined in FIG. 6).
From these results, it was apparent that the KK strain manifests a late embryogenesis gene expression pattern even in seedlings, and that the progression of photomorphogenesis is decreased. Hence, HSI2 and HSI2-L1 (HSL1) repressors were found to be essential to suppress the operation of the embryogenesis program in young sprouted plants.
Example 4
Expression Analysis by Quantitative RT-PCR
The manner in which the expression of the group of transcription factors which play an important role in the seed ripening/embryogenesis period in KK strain seedlings changes subsequent to day 4 following the imbibition treatment was investigated. That is, the total RNA was extracted from wild-type strain and KK strain seedlings on days 4, 5, 7 and 9 following the imbibition treatment, and the same procedure was followed as described above in “7. Expression Analysis by Quantitative Real-Time PCR” under “Materials and Methods.” FIG. 7A shows the results in a 1% sucrose-containing medium. In addition, the RNA was isolated from 5-day old seedlings grown in media having different sucrose concentrations, and was analyzed to quantitative RT-PCR. The results are shown in FIG. 7B.
As shown in FIG. 7A, in wild-type seedlings in a 1% sucrose-containing medium, the mRNA of both HSI2 and HSI2-L1 (HSL1) is expressed, and the mRNA level of the gene LHCB2:4 used in photosynthesis increased abruptly in the period from day 5 to day 7 when the cotyledon turns green. On the other hand, in the KK strain, compared with the wild-type strain, the expression levels for HSI2 and HSI2-L1 (HSL1) were markedly reduced in both RNA samples, but the genes OleosinS3, At2S3, LEC1, LEC2, FUS3 and WRI1 which are specific to the embryogenesis to seed maturation stages were expressed. In the KK strain, the seed maturation genes were expressed in a different pattern. In 4-day-old KK-strain seedlings, the mRNAs of Ole3 and At2S3 were already more than 30-fold the levels in the wild-type strain, and these mRNA levels increased further up until day 7. Also, dramatic increases in the mRNA levels of the genes LEC1, LEC2 and FUS3 were observed in 4 to 5-day-old seedlings. The expression timing of the master regulator factors for germination resembled the callus-like structure growth initiation period in the hypocotyl. Because the abnormal expression of LEC1 and LEC triggers the embryogenesis program, the activation of these regulator genes brings about the expression of seed maturation genes. As for the mRNA of the WRI1/ASML1 gene, at least 4 days after imbibition treatment, the level of mRNA was already high in the KK strain. Unlike the other genes investigated here, in the wild-type strain, WRI1/ASML1 was expressed in vegetative tissue at a markedly lower level than in the silique. HSI2 and HSI2-L1 (HSL1) appeared to play a more direct role than other genes in regulating the expression of WRI1.
Also, as shown in FIG. 7B, the presence of from 30 mM (1.0%, w/v) to 90 mM (3.1%, w/v) sucrose promotes close to twice as much HSI2 and HSL1 expression as when sucrose is absent, yet 10 mM sucrose was sufficient to suppress the expression of LHCB2;4. KK-strain seedlings grown on a 1% sucrose-containing medium showed a marked decrease in LHCB2;4 expression compared with the wild-type strain. The expression of seed maturation genes in KK-strain seedlings showed a responsiveness that varied with the sucrose concentration. The expression of OleS3, LEC1 and FUS3 was sufficiently induced by 10 mM sucrose, whereas At2S3 and LEC2 exhibited sucrose concentration-dependent increases in expression up to a sucrose concentration of 90 mM. The level of WRI1/ASML1 expression was greatest at a sucrose concentration of 30 mM. These results show that the influence of sucrose in seed maturation gene expression is not uniform, which suggests the possibility that sucrose participates directly or indirectly in the expression of these genes via a plurality of sugar signaling pathways.
Example 5
Accumulation of Seed Storage Products in KK Strain
Using microarray analysis, in the KK strain, a late embryogenesis gene expression profile was observed even in seedlings (Example 3). SDS-PAGE analysis was thus carried out to determine whether seed storage proteins had accumulated in the KK-strain seedlings. The protein was extracted from wild-type and KK-strain seedlings on days 4, 7 and 9 following the imbibition treatment in a sucrose-free medium or a medium containing 1% sucrose, and the same procedure was followed as described above in “8. SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting” under “Materials and Methods.” Also, to determine whether a lipid which is a seed-specific storage product has accumulated in the wild-type and KK-strain seedlings, the same procedure was followed as described above in “9. FAT RED 7B Staining” under “Materials and Methods.” In addition, to determine whether this staining is due to triacylglycerol (TAG), the same procedure was followed as described above in “10. Lipid Analysis” under “Materials and Methods.” Protein samples extracted from dry seeds of the wild-type strain were used as the control in SDS-PAGE, etc. Those results are shown in FIGS. 8A to 8C.
FIG. 8A shows the results of Western blotting following SDS-PAGE. In SDS-PAGE, large disparities between the wild-type strain and the KK strain were not found in the protein extract samples at any stage. Therefore, as shown in FIG. 8A, through Western blotting using an antibody for oleosin S4, which is a seed-specific protein, and using an antibody for 12S globulin, which likewise is a seed-specific protein, the presence or absence of differences in protein expression therebetween was detected. That is, these protein signals were not detected at any stage in wild-type seedlings grown in a sucrose-free medium, whereas oleosin S4 signals were detected in KK strain seedlings on day 4 following the imbibition treatment. Moreover, even in the KK strain, 12S globulin signals were not detected. When seedlings were grown in a sucrose-containing medium, in wild-type seedlings, on day 4 following the imbibition treatment, only oleosin S4 was detected; none of the other proteins was detected. By contrast, in KK strain seedlings, both proteins were detected at all growth stages. These results indicate that, in the KK strain, seed storage proteins accumulate in seedlings in a sucrose-dependent manner.
FIG. 8B shows the results of staining with FAT RED 7B. As shown in FIG. 8B, on day 5 following the imbibition treatment, in wild-type seedlings, only the roots stained faintly, whereas in the KK strain, strong staining occurred in the hypocotyls. On day 12 following the imbibition treatment, substantially no staining occurred in the wild-type strain, whereas in the KK strain, along with the strong staining already observed in the hypocotyl, staining also occurred in the cotyledon. These results suggest that seed storage lipids accumulate in the KK-strain seedlings.
FIG. 8C shows the results of lipid analysis. In wild-type seedlings grown in a sucrose-free medium, only a very small amount of TAG was detected. By contrast, in KK-strain day 4 seedlings, a large amount of TAG accumulation was detected. However, even in the KK strain, on day 9, the TAG had disappeared. These results agreed with the oleosin S4 accumulation pattern shown in FIG. 8A. In wild-type seedlings grown in a sucrose-containing medium, on day 4 following the imbibition treatment, the same level of TAG as in the KK strain had accumulated. However, on day 9, most of the TAG had disappeared. By contrast, in the KK strain, even on day 9, the same level of TAG as on day 4 had accumulated. From the above, seed storage lipid accumulation was found to be sucrose-induced in KK strain seedlings.
Example 6
Embryogenic Callus Formation
In the KK strain, given that the cellular state in late embryogenesis appears also in the seedling and the hypocotyl becomes callus-like, it was thought that the ability for shoot redifferentiation is achieved by means of the plant hormones cytokinin and auxin which regulate plant growth. Therefore, wild-type and KK strain seed were sown in a shoot inducing medium (SIM) containing 0.86 μM of indoleacetic acid and 2.5 μM of N6-(Δ2-isopentenyl)-adenine, and the plants were observed. The results are shown in FIG. 9.
As shown in FIG. 9, on day 21 after sowing, the wild-type strain exhibited a state which was largely the same as when grown in a hormone-free medium, whereas the KK strain exhibited organ regeneration such as a redifferentiated shoot and leaves from a callus-like hypocotyl. In the wild-type strain, such shoot regeneration is observed only in calluses that have been pretreated on a callus-inducing medium (CIM).
Next, to verify whether such KK strain calluses are dedifferentiated calluses or embryogenic calluses, the hypocotyls of wild-type seedlings and KK strain seedlings on day 7 following the imbibition treatment were cut off, transplanted to a hormone-free medium, and cultured for 14 days. A total of 48 hypocotyls from KK strain seedlings were cultured. The results are shown in FIG. 10.
As shown in FIG. 10, callus development did not occur in hypocotyls from wild-type seedlings, whereas 48 hypocotyls from KK strain seedlings exhibited abnormal cell division similar to callus development. Moreover, the hypocotyls of wild-type seedlings were substantially not stained by FAT RED 7B, whereas the entire hypocotyls from KK strain seedlings were strongly stained by FAT RED 7B. This suggested that lipid has accumulated in the same way as in late embryogenesis cells. It was apparent from the above that the KK strain, because the expression by mRNA of transcription factors relating to seed storage proteins and embryogenesis continues even in seedlings, has a hypocotyl with a high cell division activity similar to that of cells during embryogenesis.
Protein was extracted from wild-type and KK-strain hypocotyls cut from seedlings on day 7 after imbibition treatment as noted above, and also from wild-type hypocotyls subjected to callus induction on a CIM medium containing 2.3 μM auxin and 0.46 μM kinetin (Koncz et al.) (CIM callus), following which SDS-PAGE and Western blotting using oleosin S4 antibody and 12S globulin antibody were carried out. The results are shown in FIG. 11.
It can be seen from the SDS-PAGE results in FIG. 11 that, as in the seed protein extraction sample used as a control, seed storage protein bands believed to be a 12S globulin A subunit (31 kDa), a 12S globulin B subunit (23 kDa) and a 2S albumin (5 kDa) were detected in the KK strain. Moreover, the KK strain band pattern resembled not only the band pattern for a seed protein extraction sample, but also the band pattern for a wild-type hypocotyl extraction sample. These results appear to indicate that calluses derived from KK strain hypocotyls have the characteristics of both seeds and vegetative tissue. From the Western blotting results also shown in FIG. 11, strong signals for oleosin S4 and 12S globulin were observed in protein extraction samples from seeds serving as the control and from hypocotyl calluses derived from the KK strain. These findings appear to indicate that KK strain hypocotyls form embryogenic calluses independent of plant hormones.
Example 7
Lipid Analysis
Lipids were extracted with 1 mL of a chloroform/methanol mixture (2:1, v/v) from 20 mg of tissue obtained from, respectively, seedlings (wild-type (Co1-0 strain) and KK mutant strain) on day 7 following vernalization and from dry seeds (wild-type strain), following which the lipid extracts were centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 5 minutes. The supernatant was evaporated to dryness, then re-dissolved by the addition of 250 μL of methanol and 15 μL of 2% C15=0Me. Next, 900 μL of methanol and 1 mL of 10% HCl (in methanol) were added to 100 μL of the re-dissolved sample, and methanolysis was carried out at 80° C. for 1 hour. Following methanolysis, 1.5 mL of n-hexane was added and stirring was carried out, then the n-hexane phase was recovered and evaporated to dryness under N2 conditions. The hard-dried sample was re-dissolved in 500 μl, of n-hexane, and the fatty acid content of the fatty acid methyl esters was quantitatively determined by gas chromatography using a GC2010 (Shimadzu Corporation). The results are shown in FIG. 12.
As shown in FIG. 12, the fatty acid composition extracted from the KK mutant strain seedlings differed from that extracted from the Co1-0 wild-type strain, and contained a large amount of seed-specific fatty acids (C18=1, C20=1). It appears from these results that KK seedlings store seed oils.
INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY
The present invention may be employed for creating transformed plant bodies. Use is particularly effective for creating transformed plant bodies which control the accumulation of useful storage products such as carbohydrates and lipids.

## Claims

1. A plant body configured to suppress a function of a sugar-inducible sweet potato sporamin minimal promoter by repressing expression of at least a first protein and a second protein, wherein:
the first protein comprises a sequence having at least 95% homology to the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 2, or is encoded by a sequence having at least 95% homology to the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1;
the second protein comprises a sequence having at least 95% homology to the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 4, or is encoded by a sequence having at least 95% homology to the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 3; and
the plant body accumulates a storage product at a site other than a normal storage organ by sugar induction.

2. The plant body of claim 1, further comprising an extrinsic factor that represses the expression of genes respectively coding for the first protein and the second protein.

3. The plant body of claim 1, which exhibits sugar-induced late embryogenesis-type gene expression.

4. The plant body of claim 1, which exhibits gene expression in which the expression level increases for one or two or more genes selected from among genes coding for sugar-induced storage product-related proteins and transcription factor genes that positively regulate the genes coding for storage product-related proteins, and in which the expression level decreases for one or two or more genes selected from among photosynthesis-related genes.

5. The plant body of claim 1, wherein the storage product is a storage product in seed.

6. The plant body of claim 1, wherein the storage product contains oil.

7. The plant body of claim 1, wherein the plant body is a seedling that accumulates the storage product in a hypocotyl.

8. The plant body of claim 1, wherein the plant body is a seed.

9. The plant body of claim 8, wherein the seed accumulates a storage product by sugar induction in a hypocotyl of a seedling that is germinated.

10. The plant body of claim 1, wherein the plant body is a cultured tissue.

11. The plant body of claim 10, wherein the cultured tissue is a callus.

12. The plant body of claim 1, wherein the plant body is a plant cell.

13. The plant body of claim 1, wherein the plant body is mouse-ear cress (Arabidopsis thaliana) or derived from said plant species.

14. A plant body production method comprising a step of manufacturing a plant body configured to suppress a function of a sugar-inducible sweet potato sporamin minimal promoter by repressing expression of at least a first protein and a second protein, wherein:
the first protein comprises a sequence having at least 95% homology to the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 2, or is encoded by a sequence having at least 95% homology to the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1;
the second protein comprises a sequence having at least 95% homology to the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 4, or is encoded by a sequence having at least 95% homology to the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 3; and
the plant body accumulates a storage product at a site other than a normal storage organ by sugar induction.

15. A method of producing a plant storage product, the method comprising a step of producing, in the presence of sugar, a storage product in the plant body of claim 1.

16. A plant storage product production enhancer comprising one or two or more nucleic acid construct, wherein the enhancer suppresses expression of at least a first protein and a second protein, wherein:
the first protein comprises a sequence having at least 95% homology to the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 2, or is encoded by a sequence having at least 95% homology to the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1;
the second protein comprises a sequence having at least 95% homology to the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 4, or is encoded by a sequence having at least 95% homology to the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 3.

17. The plant body of claim 1, wherein the plant body is a seedling.

18. The plant body of claim 1, wherein:
the first protein comprises the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 2, or is encoded by the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1; and
the second protein comprises the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 4, or is encoded by the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 3.

19. The method of claim 14, wherein:
the first protein comprises the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 2, or is encoded by the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1; and
the second protein comprises the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 4, or is encoded by the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 3.

20. The plant storage product production enhancer of claim 16, wherein:
the first protein comprises the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 2, or is encoded by the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1; and
the second protein comprises the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 4, or is encoded by the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 3.