alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1327.7 Procedures for NDR information requests. ( a ) To initiate an NDR file check, an individual who is employed or seeking employment as a motor vehicle operator; who has applied for or received an airman's certificate; who is employed or seeking employment as a locomotive operator; who holds or has applied for a license, certificate of registry, or a merchant mariner's document or is an officer, chief warrant officer, or enlisted member of the U.S. Coast Guard or Coast Guard Reserve; or who is seeking employment as pilot with an air carrier; or an individual subject to a personnel security investigation; shall either: ( 1 ) Complete, sign and submit a request for an NDR file check directly to the chief driver licensing official of a participating State in accordance with procedures established by that State for this purpose; or
( 2 ) Authorize, by completing and signing a written consent, the authorized NDR user to request a file check through the chief driver licensing official of a participating State in accordance with the procedures established by that State for this purpose.
( b ) If the authorized NDR user is an employer or prospective employer of a motor vehicle operator, the request for an NDR file check must be submitted through the chief driver licensing official of the State in which the individual is licensed to operate a motor vehicle.
( c ) If the authorized NDR user is the head of a Federal department or agency, the request for an NDR file check may be submitted instead directly to the NDR in accordance with procedures established by the NDR for this purpose.
( d ) The request for an NDR file check or the written consent, whichever is used, must: ( 1 ) State that the NDR records are to be released;
( 2 ) State as specifically as possible who is authorized to receive the records;
( 3 ) Be signed and dated by the individual (or the individual's legal representative as appropriate);
( 4 ) Specifically state that the authorization is valid for only one search of the NDR (or in the case of a personnel security investigation state that the authorization is valid only for the duration of the investigation); and
( 5 ) Except for inquiries concerning personnel security investigations, specifically state that the NDR identifies probable matches that require further inquiry for verification; that it is recommended, but not required, that the employer/prospective employer verify matches with the State of Record; and that individuals have the right to request records regarding themselves from the NDR to verify their accuracy.
[64 FR 19273, Apr. 20, 1999, as amended at 70 FR 52299, Sept. 2, 2005]
Case 16-01173-BFK Doc 60 Filed 07/18/19 Entered 07/18/19 13:20:46 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 14
Case 16-01173-BFK Doc 60 Filed 07/18/19 Entered 07/18/19 13:20:46 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 14
Case 16-01173-BFK Doc 60 Filed 07/18/19 Entered 07/18/19 13:20:46 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 14
Case 16-01173-BFK Doc 60 Filed 07/18/19 Entered 07/18/19 13:20:46 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 14
Case 16-01173-BFK Doc 60 Filed 07/18/19 Entered 07/18/19 13:20:46 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 14
Case 16-01173-BFK Doc 60 Filed 07/18/19 Entered 07/18/19 13:20:46 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 14
Case 16-01173-BFK Doc 60 Filed 07/18/19 Entered 07/18/19 13:20:46 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 14
Case 16-01173-BFK Doc 60 Filed 07/18/19 Entered 07/18/19 13:20:46 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 14
Case 16-01173-BFK Doc 60 Filed 07/18/19 Entered 07/18/19 13:20:46 Desc Main

Document Page 9 of 14
Case 16-01173-BFK Doc 60 Filed 07/18/19 Entered 07/18/19 13:20:46 Desc Main

Document Page 10 of 14
Case 16-01173-BFK Doc 60 Filed 07/18/19 Entered 07/18/19 13:20:46 Desc Main

Document Page 11 of 14
Case 16-01173-BFK Doc 60 Filed 07/18/19 Entered 07/18/19 13:20:46 Desc Main

Document Page 12 of 14
Case 16-01173-BFK Doc 60 Filed 07/18/19 Entered 07/18/19 13:20:46 Desc Main

Document Page 13 of 14
Case 16-01173-BFK Doc 60 Filed 07/18/19 Entered 07/18/19 13:20:46 Desc Main

Document Page 14 of 14
Back to: http://dnr.metrokc.gov/wlr/indwaste/dentists.htm



### Mercury levels in Ki ng County biosolids:

Over the last few years, 95 percent of King C ounty dental offices have taken steps to reduce the amounts of mercury and silver discharged to the sewer system. Most offices have installed amalgam separators and followed th e required Best Manageme nt Practices (BMPs) for amalgam wastes and spent fixer.

Partially as a result of these activities, mercury levels in Ki ng County biosolids have dropped by 50 percent.

The following graph illustrates the reduction in mercury in the county’s biosolids:

The condition of our biosolids is the best indi cator of the quality of King County wastewater discharges. King County’s biosolids (go to: http://dnr.metrokc.gov/wtd/biosolids/index.htm ) contain only very small amounts of metals and organic chemicals, tha nks to the cooperation of county businesses and industry. After processing and treatment, the county’s biosolids are beneficially recycled used as soil conditioners on farms, forests, lawns and gardens. Efforts to remove mercury from wastewater are ways to keep biosolids clean an d safe for recycling.

To help sustain this success, the King C ounty Industrial Waste Program is monitoring how dental offices are practicing the required BMPs by continuing to inspect a portion of these offices each year. And we will continue to track mercury levels in the county’s biosolids.

The county is also participating in a national st udy of mercury concentrat ions in the treatment plant influent, effluent, and bi osolids, under the auspices of the National Association of Clean Water Agencies: http://www.nacwa.org/

.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 368 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 368

To authorize the production of records by the Permanent Subcommittee on 
 Investigations of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
                                Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 21, 2019

  Mr. McConnell (for himself and Mr. Schumer) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To authorize the production of records by the Permanent Subcommittee on 
 Investigations of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 
                                Affairs.

Whereas, the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on 
        Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs conducted an investigation 
        into China's impact on the U.S. education system;
Whereas, the Subcommittee has received a request from the U.S. Department of 
        Education for access to records of the Subcommittee's investigation;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate can, by administrative or judicial process, be 
        taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate;
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate is needed for the promotion of justice, the Senate will take 
        such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the 
        privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the 
Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Homeland 
Security and Governmental Affairs, acting jointly, are authorized to 
provide to the U.S. Department of Education and other regulatory 
agencies, law enforcement officials, and entities or individuals duly 
authorized by Federal or State governments, records of the 
Subcommittee's investigation into China's impact on the U.S. education 
system.
                                 <all>
```
SECOND AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                               PURCHASE AGREEMENT


         This Second Amendment to the Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement") is
made and entered into this 14th day of November 2001, by and between BANK OF
HOVEN, a South Dakota State Bank. (the "Bank") and THE CREDIT STORE, INC., a
Delaware corporation (the "Purchaser").

                                    RECITALS:

         WHEREAS, the Bank and Purchaser have entered into a certain Purchase
Agreement dated the 9th day of February 1999 and the Bank and Purchaser deem an
amendment to the existing Purchase Agreement in the interests of the parties;

         NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree to amend their
Agreement as follows:

1)       Section 1.3 of the Purchase Agreement shall be amended to delete the
         words Section 4.1 hereof" at the end of the paragraph and replaced with
         the words "Section 4.1 and 4.2 hereof"

2)       Section 1.6(b)(vii) of the Purchase Agreement shall be amended to
         replace the words " within 5 days" with "within fifteen (15) days".

3)       Article 4 of the Purchase Agreement shall be amended to add the
         following "Section 4.2 Purchase of Charged-off Card Accounts. If a Card
         account charges-off in accordance with the Banks charge-off policy, the
         Bank shall immediately convey the charged-off Card account to the
         Purchaser. The purchase price for the charged-off Card accounts shall
         be an amount equal to the par value of the outstanding credit generated
         by balance transfers, cash advances, and purchases on the Cards
         accounts that have not previously been purchased by Purchaser under the
         Purchase Agreement." Charged-off Card accounts subject to the
         Repurchase Agreement dated September 20, 1999, between the parties are
         not included and will not be conveyed to the Purchaser hereunder.

         In all other respects the February 9, 1999 Purchase Agreement is
confirmed and ratified.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on
the date set forth above.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

BANK:                                                        PURCHASER:
----                                                         ---------
<S>                                                         <C>

BANK OF HOVEN                                                THE CREDIT STORE, INC.

By:  /s/ Cindy Jager                                         By:  /s/  Cynthia D. Hassoun
     ---------------                                              -----------------------
  Its: Vice President, Credit Card Operations                  Its:  Vice President and Secretary
        Manager
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      21.1





SUBSIDIARIES
      OF REGISTRANT


SUBSIDIARIES
      OF


WHITEMARK
      HOMES, INC.





A.
            Wholly-owned
                subsidiaries of Whitemark Homes, Inc., a Colorado
                corporation:





Whitemark
      Homes of Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation




B.
              Wholly-owned
                  subsidiary of Whitemark Homes of Florida,
                  Inc.:





Home
      Funding, Inc., a Florida corporation





C.
            Partnership
                and Limited Liability Corporation interests held by Whitemark Homes
                of Florida, Inc.:


Whitemark
        at Fox Glen, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership (99% limited partnership
        interest; the remaining 1% interest is held by general partner Fox Glen
        Management Corporation, which is wholly- owned by Kenneth L. White)
 
 Sheeler
        Hills, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership (99% limited partnership interest;
        the remaining 1% interest is held by general partner Sheeler Hills Management
        Corporation, which is wholly-owned by Kenneth L. White)
 Whitemark
          at Oak Park, LLC
  Whitemark
          at Corner Lake, LLC
  Whitemark
          at Glenbrook, LLC
  Whitemark
          at Little Creek, LLC
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR EQUIVALENT

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report of Hitachi, Ltd. on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2007 (the Report) pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Exchange
Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Kazuo Furukawa, President of Hitachi, Ltd., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hitachi, Ltd.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                             
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------
|Date:    June 26, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Kazuo Furukawa          
|                       |  |     |  | Name:         Kazuo Furukawa
|                       |  |     |  | Title:           President
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION

1 June 4, 2015

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Weight Reduction Information Obtained for Proposed HD GHG Phase 2 Trailer Program

FROM: Jessica Brakora, Mechanical Engineer, Assessm ent and Standards Division

TO: Matthew Spears, Director, Heavy-Duty Onroad and Non road Center

EPA received confidential business information (CBI ) from a trailer manufacturer during the comment period of our Small Business Regulatory Enf orcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) panel process. The agencies obtained permission to use this inform ation, provided we do not reveal the company’s name as the source of the data. The following tabl e lists the components and estimates of weight savings provided by the company.

ORIGINAL COMPONENT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTION WEIGHT
REDUCTION (POUNDS) Steel wheels (8) Aluminum wheels (8) 240

Cast iron hub and drum (4) Reconfigured cast iron hub and drum (4) 160

Dual tires with steel wheels (8) Single wide-based tires with aluminum wheels (4) 480

Steel upper coupler assembly Aluminum upper coupler assembly 430

Steel tandem-axle suspension
sub-frame Aluminum tandem-axle suspension sub-frame 280

This information was used in combination with weigh t savings information obtained from public sources to create the list of weight reduction comp onents in our proposal.

Attachments Deleted [CBI comments received November 10, 2014]
United States Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460
Section 4 Submission This is an original submission: This is an amendment: CERTIFICATION I hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that (1) all information entered on this form is complete and accurate; and (2) any confidentiality claims are true and correct as to that information for which they have been asserted. Any knowing and willful misinterpretation is subject to criminal penalty pursuant to 18 USC 1001. Signature: Official Title: VP Regulatory Compliance Contact Person: Dennis R. Migneault Email Address: DMigneault@thechemco.com Date Signed: 07/31/2014 PART 1 Contact Information Submission Information Submission Type:

TestRules Form Alias: TestRules-20140729-00:50:42 EDT Federal Register Notice: 76 FR 65385 Date Submitted: 07/31/2014 Submitter Information Company Name:

The Chemical Company Address: 44 Southwest Avenue Jamestown, RI, 02835 United States Contact Person: Dennis R. Migneault Phone Number: 4017828154 Email Address: DMigneault@thechemco.com Technical Contact Information CBI

Yes: No: Company Name: The Chemical Company Address: 44 Southwest Avenue Jamestown, RI, 02835 United States Contact Person: Dr Dennis R. Migneault Phone Number: 4017828154 Email Address: DMigneault@thechemco.com PART 2 Letter Of IntentSEC4 Submission Page 2

Chemical Identification CASRN:

98-56-6 CBI Yes: No:
Chemical Name: Benzene, 1-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)- Chemical Test Name: B Chemical Test Name: C6 Sponsoring Firms CBI

Yes: No: Company Name: The Chemical Company Address: 44 Southwest Avenue Jamestown, RI, 02835 United States Phone Number: 4017828154 Additional Information Document Type:

Exemption Application File Name: N/A Attachment Date: 07/31/2014 Exemption Sought on following Testing requirement(s): Algal Growth Inhibition Test. Provide the basis for the exemption request: Exemption sought for tests B and C6. A consortium of 12 companies have conducted all tests and submitted results to the EPA at this point. Also our volumes are projected to be less than 1% of the total volume of 2011 values Manufactured/Imported. Chemicals PART 5 Optional Substantiation Attached Document(s) File Name:

SKMBT_C22014071012591-1.pdf Attachment Date: 07/31/2014 Effects: Environmental Fate Endpoints: Bioaccumulation: aquatic/sediment
Paperwork Reduction Act:The Government Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA) (44 U.S.C. 3501) provides that, when practicable, Federal organizations use electronic forms, electronic filings, and electronic signatures to conduct official business with the public. EPA's Cross-Media Electronic Reporting Regulation (CROMERR) (40 CFR part 3), published in the Federal Register on October 13, 2005 (70 FR 59848) (FRL-7977-1)(Ref. 2), provides that any requirement in title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to submit a report directly to EPA can be satisfied with an electronic submission that meets certain conditions once the Agency published a notice in the Federal Register announcing that EPA is prepared to receive certain documents in electronic form. For more information about CROMERR, go tohttp://www.epa.gov/cromerr/

.
Janice S. Lee, Assessment Manager

Preliminary Materials for 

the IRIS Assessment of 

tert-Butyl Alcohol 

(tert-Butanol) 

Office of Research and Development

National Center for Environmental Assessment, Integrated Risk Information System December 12, 2013
1

General Information

• tert-Butanol is a white crystalline solid or colorless liquid (above 77°C).

• tert-Butanol is used as a solvent, denaturant for alcohols, dehydrating agent, 

and in the manufacture of methyl methacrylate, flotation agents, fruit essences, 

perfumes, and proposed as an octane booster in gasoline

• tert-Butanol is subject to reporting under section 313 of the Emergency Planning 

and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) (Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) 

Chemical) 

Exposure

• Individuals working at facilities where tert-butanol is produced or used may be 

exposed.

• General population exposures may occur through the ingestion of drinking water 

and foods and inhalation of air containing tert- butanol.
2
3

Preliminary Materials for the IRIS Assessment of 

tert-Butanol:

• Draft literature search strategy

• Draft literature search results

• Preliminary evidence tables

• Preliminary exposure-response arrays 

*These materials are available online at: 

http://www.epa.gov/iris/publicmeeting/iris_bimonthly-dec2013/mtg_docs.htm
4

Literature Search Strategy

• The literature search identified 

more than 2,400 studies for tertbutanol.

• 184 references are being 

considered for the assessment 

after an initial screen for 

relevance.

Data Extraction to Evidence 

Tables

• 33 references directly informing 

hazard identification are 

described in evidence tables.

33 studies in 

evidence tables
5

Features of the tert-Butanol Database

Chronic Subchronic

Two-Gen 

Repro/Dev

MOA

Information PBPK

Oral     

Inhalation    

• Human data on exposures to tert-butanol consist of a case report, an 

occupational study with co-exposures to other solvents, and studies 

assessing acute effects. 
6

Endpoints with Data for 

Evaluating Hazard 

• Kidney Effects 

• Thyroid Effects 

• Reproductive, Developmental, 

and Neurodevelopmental Effects 

• Central Nervous System (CNS) 

Effects 

• Other Systemic Effects (Body 

Weight, Liver, and Urinary 

Bladder)

• Genotoxic Effects 

Scientific Considerations

• PBPK models

• Metabolite in MTBE and ETBE 

models 

• Kidney mode of action

• Alpha2u-globulin-associatednephropathy 

• Chronic progressive nephropathy 

(CPN)

• Thyroid follicular cell tumors 
7

EPA welcomes all comments, such as:

• Clarity and transparency of materials

• Additional approach for identifying studies

• Selection of studies for data extraction

• Study quality considerations

• Additional studies that may inform the assessment
§ 636.403 What information may be exchanged with a clarification? ( a ) You may wish to clarify any aspect of proposals which would enhance your understanding of an offeror's proposal. This includes such information as an offeror's past performance or information regarding adverse past performance to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Clarification exchanges are discretionary. They do not have to be held with any specific number of offerors and do not have to address specific issues.
( b ) You may wish to clarify and revise the RFP document through an addenda process in response to questions from potential offerors.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS RULINGS

Release No. 6898/February 17, 2023

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-21243

In the Matter of :

:

THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT OF : ORDER

AMERICAN CRYPTOFED DAO LLC :

The Securities and Exchange Commission instituted this proceeding with an Order 

Instituting Proceedings (OIP) on November 18, 2022. The proceeding is a stop order proceeding, 

authorized pursuant to Section 8(d) of the Securities Act of 1933. As the Commission ordered, the 

hearing before the undersigned Administrative Law Judge in this proceeding commenced at 10:00 

a.m. EST on December 1, 2022. Hearing sessions were held on December 1, 2, and 6, 2022, and 

January 18 and 19, 2023, and the hearing was closed. A post-hearing schedule was set. American 

CryptoFed DAO LLC, Admin. Proc. Rulings Release No. 6896, 2023 SEC LEXIS 163 (Jan. 20, 

2023).

Under consideration are Respondent’s February 14, 2023, motion titled “Motion to Confirm 

the Division of Enforcement’s Obligation to Prove OIP Allegation #20,” the Division’s February 

15, 2023, Opposition, and Respondent’s February 16, 2023, Reply.

OIP Paragraph 20 alleges “On June 21, 2022, Respondent sent a letter to Commission staff 

via e-mail” and quotes from the alleged text of the alleged letter. If Respondent wishes to dispute 

that it sent the alleged letter or the accuracy of the alleged text, it may do so in its Opposition to the 

Division’s Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. As required by Section 

557(c)(3)(A) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 557(c)(3)(A), the Initial Decision will 

include a statement of “findings and conclusions, and the reasons of basis therefor, on all the 

material issues of fact, law, or discretion presented on the record.” (emphasis added). See also

Rule 360(b) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. § 201.360(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/S/ Carol Fox Foelak

Carol Fox Foelak

Administrative Law Judge