June 26, 2013 

IM Ref. No. 20134121542 

RESPONSE OF THE OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL NexPoint Credit Strategies Fund 

DIVISION OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT File No. 811-21869 

Your letter dated June 20,2013 requests our assurance that we would not recommend 

enforcement action to the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") under Section 

5(b) or Section 6(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") against NexPoint Credit 

Strategies Fund (the "Fund"), which has filed and had declared effective by the Commission a 

shelf registration statement on Form N-2 ("Registration Statement"), ifthe Fund files a 

post-effective amendment to its Registration Statement pursuant to Rule 486(b) under the 

Securities Act, under the circumstances set forth in your letter. 

Background 

You state that the Fund is a closed-end management investment company registered 

under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "Investment Company Act"). The Fund filed 

and had declared effective by the Commission its Registration Statement pursuant to which it 

may issue common shares on a delayed or continuous basis in accordance with Rule 415(a)(1)(x) 

under the Securities Act and the positions of the Commission staff. 1 NexPoint Advisors, L.P. 

serves as the investment adviser to the Fund. The Fund's common shares are registered under 

Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are listed and traded on the New York 

Stock Exchange. The Fund has a fiscal year ending on December 31. 

You state that the Fund's board of trustees (the "Board"), including a majority of 

independent trustees, has concluded that a continuously effective shelf registration statement 

would be beneficial to the Fund, its stockholders and potential investors. You state that the Fund 

believes that it might be unable to sell securities off its effective registration statement for 

significant portions of each year due to the need to file a post-effective amendment pursuant to 

Section 8(c) ofthe Securities Act ("Post-Effective Amendment") to bring the Fund's financial 

statements up to date. You further state that the Fund, its stockholders and potential investors 

would benefit if Post-Effective Amendments filed for the purpose of bringing the Fund's 

financial statements up to date or to make any other non-material changes were effective 

immediately, as permitted by Rule 486(b) under the Securities Act available to certain registered 

closed-end investment companies. You state that utilization of Rule 486(b) would help ensure 

that the Fund has the ability to raise capital without significant periods of disruption to such 

offering process, and could reduce expenses incurred by the Fund in the Post-Effective 

Amendment process. You further state that due to the limited purpose for which the Fund would 

use Rule 486(b ), no erosion of investor protection would occur and investors could have faster 

access to important information about the Fund, including its updated financial information. 

See Nuveen Virginia Premium Income Municipal Fund, SEC StaffNo-Action Letter (Oct. 6, 2006); Pilgrim 

America Prime Rate Trust, SEC StaffNo-Action Letter (May I, 1998) ("Pilgrim Letter"). 
Discussion 

Rule 486(b) under the Securities Act, in relevant part, states that a post-effective 

amendment to a registration statement filed by a registered closed-end management investment 

company which makes periodic repurchase offers under Rule 23c-3 under the Investment 

Company Act ("Interval Fund") shall become effective on the date on which it is filed with the 

Commission, provided that certain conditions are met. The conditions of Rule 486(b) require, 

among other things, that the post-effective amendment be filed for no purpose other than, among 

other things, bringing the financial statements up to date or making non-material changes, and 

that the registrant make certain representations concerning the purpose for which the amendment 

is filed. 

In adopting Rule 486(b) in 1994, the Commission recognized that Interval Funds may 

have a need to raise capital continuously, and therefore need continuously effective registration 

statements and would benefit if certain filings could become effective automatically. 2 The 

Commission staff in 1998 recognized that registered closed-end management investment 

companies such as the Fund, which are not Interval Funds, also may benefit from the flexibility 

to take advantage of favorable market conditions to raise additional capital through continuous or 

delayed offerings of its securities. 3 You assert that the Fund and its shareholders also would 

benefit if the Fund's Post-Effective Amendments that comply with the conditions of Rule 486(b) 

could become effective immediately pursuant to that Rule. 

You represent that each filing made in reliance on the requested relief would be made in 

compliance with the conditions of Rule 486(b ), and that the Fund will file a Post-Effective 

Amendment containing a prospectus pursuant to Section 8(c) ofthe Securities Act prior to any 

offering ofits securities at a price below net asset value. You also represent that in relying on 

the requested relief to sell common shares, the Fund will sell newly issued shares at a price no 

lower than the sum of the Fund's net asset value plus the per share commission or underwriting 

discount.4 

Conclusion 

Based on the facts and representations set forth in your letter, we would not recommend 

that the Commission take any enforcement action under Section 5(b) or Section 6(a) ofthe 

Securities Act against the Fund if the Fund files Post-Effective Amendments to its Registration 

Statement pursuant to Rule 486(b) under the Securities Act. This response expresses our view on 

enforcement action only and does not express any legal or interpretive conclusion on the issues 

presented. Because our position is based upon all ofthe facts and representations in your letter, 

2 See Post-Effective Amendments to Investment Company Registration Statements, Investment Company 

Act Release No. 20486 (Aug. 17, 1994), n.22 and accompanying text. An Interval Fund operates pursuant to a 

fundamental policy that requires the Interval Fund to make periodic offers to repurchase its common stock in an 

amount not less than five percent ofthe outstanding shares. See Rule 23c-3 under the Investment Company Act. 

These repurchase offers may create a need for the Interval Fund to replenish its assets by making a continuous or 

intermittent offering of its common stock. See Continuous or Delayed Offerings by Certain Closed-End 

Management Investment Companies; Automatic Effectiveness of Certain Registration Statements and Post-Effective 

Amendments, Investment Company Act Release No . I9391 (Apr. 7, 1993). 

See Pilgrim Letter, supra note I , at n.I2 and accompanying text. 

4 See Pilgrim Letter, supra note I, at n.4 and accompanying text. 

2 

any different facts or representations may require a different conclusion.5 We note that the Fund 

has acknowledged that the staff may withdraw any assurance granted in this letter ifthe staff 

finds that the Fund is misusing Rule 486(b) or for any other reason. 

Gc-Jo--. J:j_(Q~ 

Adam Glazer 


Senior Counsel 


The Division of Investment Management generally permits third parties to rely on no-action or interpretive 

letters to the extent that the third party's facts and circumstances are substantially similar to those described in the 

underlying request for a no-action or interpretive letter. See Informal Guidance Program for Small Entities, 

Investment Company Act Release No. 22587 (Mar. 27, 1997), n.20. In light ofthe very fact specific nature ofthe 

Fund's request, however, the position expressed in this letter applies only to the Fund, and no other entity may rely 

on this position. The staff is willing to consider similar requests from other registered closed-end management 

investment companies. 

3 


5 
ROPES & GRAY LLP 

1211 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS 

NEW YORK, NY 10036-8704 

WWW.ROPESGRAY.COM 

June 20, 2013 Michael G. Doherty 

T +1 212 497 3612 

F +1 646 728 1578 

michael.doherty@ropesgray.com 

BY EMAIL 

Douglas J. Scheidt, Esq. 

Associate Director and Chief Counsel 

Division of Investment Management 

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 

1 00 F. Street, N .E. 

Washington, DC 20549 

Re: NexPoint Credit Strategies Fund- Request for No-Action Relief 

Dear Mr. Scheidt: 

On behalf ofNexPoint Credit Strategies Fund (the "Fund"), we seek assurance that the staff 

of the Division oflnvestment Management (the "Staff') will not recommend enforcement action 

against the Fund to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") under Section 

5(b) or Section 6(a) ofthe Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), ifthe Fund 

utilizes Rule 486(b) of the Securities Act to file post-effective amendments to its registration 

statement in satisfaction of the undertakings contained in the Fund's registration statement, under 

the circumstances set forth in this letter. 

I. Background 

The Fund is a closed-end management investment company that is registered under the 

Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Company Act"). NexPoint 

Advisors, L.P. serves as the investment adviser to the Fund, and the Fund has a fiscal year ending 

December 31. The Fund's common shares are registered under Section 12(b) of the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and have been listed and traded on the New York Stock 

Exchange since the inception of the Fund. The Fund has filed and had declared effective by the 

Commission a shelf registration statement on Form N-2 pursuant to which it has registered, and 

may issue, securities in accordance with the terms of Rule 415(a)(1)(x) under the Securities Act and 

the positions of the Staff articulated in Pilgrim America Prime Rate Trust (pub. avail. May 1, 1998) 

and Nuveen Virginia Premium Income Municipal Fund (pub. avail. October 6, 2006) ("Nuveen I"). 

The Commission initially declared effective the Fund's shelf registration statement on Form 

N-2 (File Nos. 333-173004; 811-21869) on September 2, 2011. 

28224765_8 
ROPES & GRAY LLP 


Douglas J. Scheidt, Esq. - 2 - June 20, 2013 

The Board of Trustees (the "Board") of the Fund, including a majority of the independent 

directors, has concluded that the continued ability to raise capital through the public offering of 

additional securities on a delayed and continuous basis is of great benefit to the Fund and its 

stockholders. The Board also has concluded that a continuously effective shelf registration 

statement is beneficial to the Funds, their stockholders and potential investors. As discussed below, 

however, the Fund believes it might be unable to sell securities off of its effective shelf registration 

statement for significant portions of each year due to the post-effective amendment process 

currently required to bring the Fund's financial statements up to date. The Board of the Fund 

believes that the Fund, its stockholders and potential investors would benefit if the Fund were 

allowed to utilize Rule 486(b) under the Securities Act, which is available to certain registered 

closed-end investment companies, 1 to file post-effective amendments to its shelf registration 

statement in order to bring its financial statements up to date, or to make any other non-material 

changes. Investors would benefit from the Fund's ability to raise capital in continuous offerings of 

their securities at non-dilutive prices, without significant periods of disruption to such offering 

process. In addition, Fund stockholders would benefit from considerable cost savings, as expenses 

incurred in respect of the current post-effective amendment process are significant. Due to the 

limited purpose for which the Fund proposes to use Rule 486(b ), no erosion of investor protections 

would occur. 

II. Discussion 

Section 5(b )(1) ofthe Securities Act makes it unlawful for any person directly or indirectly 

to transmit, through interstate commerce, a prospectus relating to any security with respect to which 

a registration statement has been filed, unless the prospectus meets the requirements of Section 10 

ofthe Securities Act. Similarly, Section 5(b)(2) ofthe Securities Act makes it unlawful for any 

person directly or indirectly to carry or cause to be carried any security for the purpose of sale or 

delivery, unless proceeded or accompanied by a prospectus that meets the requirements of Section 

1 0( a) of the Securities Act. 

Section 1 0( a)(l) of the Securities Act, in pertinent part, states that a prospectus relating to a 

security- other than a security issued by a foreign issuer- shall contain the information contained 

in the issuer's registration statement. Section 10(a)(3) states that, notwithstanding Section 10(a)(1), 

a prospectus that is used more than nine months after the effective date of the registration statement 

must have information as of a date not more than sixteen months prior to such use, so far as the 

information is known to the user of the prospectus or can be furnished by the user ofthe prospectus 

without unreasonable effort or expense (a "Section 1 0( a)(3) Prospectus"). 

1 The Fund is not organized as an interval fund pursuant to Rule 23c-3 under the Investment Company Act, and 

therefore Rule 486(b ), on its face, is not currently available to the Fund. 

28224765_8 
ROPES & GRAY LLP 


Douglas J. Scheidt, Esq. - 3 - June 20, 2013 

Open-end management investment companies ("Open-end Funds"), unit investment trusts, 

and face-amount certificate companies are required by Section 24( e) of the Investment Company 

Act to use a Section 1 0( a )(3) Prospectus that does not vary from the latest prospectus filed as part of 

a post-effective amendment to the fund's registration statement. Open-end Funds satisfy this 

requirement by filing a post-effective amendment pursuant to Rule 485 under the Securities Act, 

which provides for automatic or immediate effectiveness. 2 Notably, however, Section 24(e) does 

not apply to closed-end management investment companies, and there is no statutory requirement 

mandating that a closed-end fund make such a post-effective filing. 3 Instead, Rule 415(a)(3) 

requires a registrant that is an investment company filing on Form N-2 to furnish the undertakings 

required by Item 34.4 of Form N-2. Item 34.4.a of Form N-2 (the registration statement utilized by 

closed-end funds) requires a closed-end fund to undertake "to file, during any period in which offers 

or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to the registration statement: (1) to include any 

prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) ofthe [Securities] Act." 

The Fund has made this undertaking in its effective registration statement. As a 

consequence, the Fund currently is required to file a post-effective amendment on an annual basis to 

update its shelf registration statement with its audited financial statements in accordance with this 

undertaking, as well as to make any non-material updates. The Fund currently is required to satisfy 

this undertaking by filing a post-effective amendment with the Commission pursuant to Section 8(c) 

of the Securities Act. Section 8(c) does not provide a mechanism for automatic effectiveness. 4 A 

post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Section 8(c) must be declared effective by the Staff in 

order to take effect. This process subjects the filings to Staff review and comment, even for routine 

non-material amendments, which is often a lengthy process. During this period, no issuances can 

take place pursuant to the post-effective amendment, thereby potentially preventing the Fund from 

taking advantage of what may be an attractive market to raise assets for the benefit of Fund 

stockholders. 

Closed-end funds that are operated as interval funds pursuant to Rule 23c-3 under the 

Investment Company Act are not subject to these delays. Rule 486(b) under the Securities Act 

provides that a post-effective amendment to an effective registration statement, or a registration 

statement for additional shares of common stock, filed by a registered closed-end management 

investment company or business development company which makes periodic repurchase offers 

under Rule 23c-3 under the Investment Company Act ("Interval Funds") shall become immediately 

effective on the date it is filed, or on a later date designated by the registrant that is no more than 30 

2 Rule 485( a) permits automatic effectiveness after the passage of a specified period of time. Rule 485(b) provides for 

immediate effectiveness of filings made for certain purposes, including, among other things, updating financial 

statements and making non-material changes. 

3 See Section 24( e) of the Investment Company Act; L. Loss & J. Seligman, Securities Regulation 566 (3rd ed. 1998). 

4 But see supra note 2 and accompanying text for a discussion of Rule 485, which provides for automatic and immediate 

effectiveness for post-effective amendments filed by Open-end Funds. 

28224765_8 
ROPES & GRAY LLP 

Douglas J. Scheidt, Esq. - 4- June 20, 2013 

days after the filing is made, provided that the post-effective amendment or registration statement is 

filed solely: (i) to register additional shares of common stock for which a registration statement filed 

on Form N-2 is effective, (ii) to bring the financial statements up to date under Section 10(a)(3) of 

the Securities Act or Rule 3-18 of Regulation S-X, (iii) to designate a new effective date for a 

previously filed post-effective amendment or registration statement for additional shares under Rule 

486(a), which has not yet become effective, (iv) to disclose or update the information required by 

Item 9c of Form N-2, 5 (v) to make any non-material changes the registrant deems appropriate, and 

(vi) for any other purpose the Commission shall approve. 

In the adopting release for Rule 486, the Commission stated that "[t]he initial proposal of 

rule 486 recognized that closed-end interval funds may need continuously effective registration 

statements and would benefit if certain filings could become effectively automatically."6 The Fund 

believes that this line of thought should be extended to it as a closed-end fund conducting offerings 

pursuant to Rule 415(a)(l)(x). 

Recently, your office has concurred with this approach. In Aberdeen Australia Equity Fund, 

Inc. (pub. avail. April 12, 2012) ("Aberdeen"), Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund 

(pub. avail. Nov. 9, 201 0) ("Nuveen II") and Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund 

(pub. avail. Feb. 14, 2011) ("Calamos"), the Staff granted no-action assurances to three closed-end 

fund complexes that were engaged in a delayed or continuous offering pursuant to Rule 

415(a)(l)(x). In the letters, the Staff agreed not to recommend enforcement action to the 

Commission under Sections 5 and 6(a) of the Securities Act based on the representation that the 

respective funds' board of directors approved the funds' delayed or continuous offerings, the 

representation that each fund's post-effective amendments would comply with the conditions of 

Rule 486(b ), and the representation that each fund would file a post-effective amendment 

containing a prospectus pursuant to Section 8( c) of the Securities Act prior to any offering of its 

common stock at a price below net asset value. 

Your office has been clear that, "[i]n light of the very fact specific nature" ofthe requests, 

this relief is limited on its face to the addressees of the no-action letters. Your office has gone on to 

note, however, that it "is willing to consider similar requests from other registered closed-end 

management investment companies." 

We submit that the Fund is similarly situated to the funds in the Aberdeen, Nuveen II, and 

Calamos letters for purposes of this relief. As was the case with each of the funds in those letters, 

5 We note that Form N-2 does not have, and has never had, an "Item 9c." Based upon a review of the administrative 

history of Rule 486, we believe that this should be a reference to Item 9.1.c. of Form N-2, which relates to information 

regarding individual portfolio managers. Accordingly the Fund plans to treat the reference to "Item 9c" as a reference to 

Item 9.l.c. ofForm N-2. 

6 Post-Effective Amendments to Investment Company Registration Statements, SEC Rei. No. 33-7083 (Aug. 17, 1994). 

28224765_8 
ROPES & GRAY LLP 


Douglas J. Scheidt, Esq. - 5-	 June 20, 2013 

the Fund's Board, including a majority of its independent directors, has concluded that the 

continued ability to raise capital through the public offering of additional securities on a delayed 

and continuous basis would benefit the Fund and its stockholders. In addition, the Fund's Board has 

concluded that a continuously effective shelf registration statement would be beneficial to the Fund, 

its stockholders and potential investors. In furtherance of these conclusions, the Fund has an 

effective registration statement on file with the Commission pursuant to which the Fund may issue 

securities on a delayed and continuous basis in accordance with Rule 415(a)(l)(x) under the 

Securities Act and the positions ofthe Commission staff in the Nuveen I and Pilgrim letters. 

As is the case with Interval Funds, the Fund and its common stockholders would also benefit 

from having a continuously effective registration statement. The ability to utilize Rule 486(b) under 

the Securities Act would have significant benefits for the Fund and its investors: 

• 	 The Fund would have the ability to raise capital as the opportunity arises; 

• 	 The Fund would reduce the expenses it presently incurs as part of the registration statement 

review and comment process, thus benefiting stockholders; and 

• 	 Investors could have faster access to important information about the Fund including 

updated financial information. 

In addition, because Rule 486(b) would only permit the Fund to update its financial 

statements, or to make non-material changes to its registration statements, the Fund believes that the 

public policy of protecting investors would be safeguarded. The Fund represents that in each case 

such filings would be made in compliance with the conditions of Rule 486(b ), and that the Fund 

will file a post-effective amendment containing a prospectus pursuant to Section 8( c) of the 

Securities Act prior to any offering of its securities at a price below net asset value. The Fund will 

sell newly issued shares at a price no lower than the sum of the Fund's net asset value plus the per 

share commission or underwriting discount. 7 

The Fund would utilize Rule 486(b) to file post-effective amendments only for purposes of: 

(1) bringing the financial statements of the Fund up to date under Section 1 0( a )(3) of the Securities 

Act or Rule 3-18 of Regulation S-X; (2) to update the information required by Item 9.l.c of Form 

N-2; or (3) to make any non-material changes the registrant deems appropriate. 8 

7 See Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund (pub. avail. Feb. 14, 2011). 

8 The Fund would not seek to use a filing made in accordance with Rule 486(b) to register additional securities without 

first obtaining relief from Rule 413 under the Securities Act. 

28224765_8 
ROPES & GRAY LLP 

Douglas J. Scheidt, Esq. - 6- June 20, 2013 

III. Conclusion 

In light of the forgoing, we seek your assurances that the Staff will deem the Fund to have 

complied with its undertaking provided in response to Item 34.4.a of Form N-2, and will not 

recommend enforcement action against the Fund to the Commission under Section 5(b) or Section 

6( a) of the Securities Act if the Fund utilizes Rule 486(b) of the Securities Act, under the 

circumstances set forth above. 

The Fund acknowledges that the Staff may withdraw any assurance granted in response to 

this letter if the Staff finds that the Fund is misusing Rule 486(b ), or for any other reason. Please 

contact the undersigned at (212) 497-3612, with any questions or comments regarding this letter. 

28224765_8