UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 79997 / February 9, 2017 

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-14594 

In the Matter of

Credit Suisse Alternative Capital, LLC 

(f/k/a Credit Suisse Alternative 

Capital, Inc.), Credit Suisse Asset 

Management, LLC, and Samir H. 

Bhatt

Respondents. 

ORDER APPROVING PLAN OF 

DISTRIBUTION AND DIRECTING 

DISBURSEMENT OF FAIR FUND

On October 19, 2011, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Administrative and 

Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 

203(e), 203(f), and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Making Findings, and Imposing 

Remedial Sanctions and Cease-and Desist Orders (“Order”)1against Credit Suisse Alternative 

Capital, LLC (f/k/a Credit Suisse Alternative Capital, Inc.) (“CSAC”), Credit Suisse Asset 

Management, LLC (“CSAM”), and Samir H. Bhatt (“Bhatt”) (collectively, “Respondents”).

As set forth in the Order, CSAC, a registered investment adviser, and Bhatt, the portfolio 

manager at CSAC, prepared the marketing materials for a largely synthetic collateralized debt 

obligation known as Class V III that was structured and marketed by Citigroup Global Markets 

Inc. The marketing materials contained misrepresentations and omissions that defrauded 

investors. The Order held CSAC and CSAM jointly and severally liable for a total of $2,500,000 

 

1

 Securities Act Rel. No. 9268 (Oct. 19, 2011).
2

in disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and a civil money penalty, and Bhatt liable for a $50,000 

civil money penalty. The Respondents made the payments as required by the Order, totaling 

$2.55 million. The Order also created a fair fund pursuant to Section 308(a) of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002, as amended, for the funds paid by the Respondents (“CSAC Fair Fund”).

On August 24, 2016, the Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority, issued a Notice of 

Proposed Plan of Distribution and Opportunity for Comment.2 The Proposed Plan of Distribution 

(“Plan”) provides for the CSAC Fair Fund to be transferred to SEC v. Citigroup Global Markets 

Inc., 11-cv-7387 (S.D.N.Y.) (“CGMI Action”), for distribution to harmed investors pursuant to a 

plan of distribution to be approved by the court in the CGMI Action. As explained in the Plan, the 

securities violations alleged in both cases, the time period of the violations, and the investors 

harmed by both frauds are the same or substantially the same. As a result, the CGMI Action 

complaint alleges “violations arising from the same or substantially the same . . . facts as those 

alleged in the Commission’s order instituting proceedings,” the criteria for transfer in Rule 

1102(a) of the Commission’s Rules on Fair Funds and Disgorgement Plans (“Rules”), 

17 C.F.R. § 201.1102(a).

3

 The Commission received no comments on the Plan. 

Consistent with the approach used by district courts when considering whether to approve 

a distribution plan, the Commission’s objective is to distribute funds in a fair and reasonable 

manner, taking into account relevant facts and circumstances.4 As noted in the Plan, the 

Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has concluded that combining the CSAC Fair Fund with 

the funds collected in the CGMI Action is fair and reasonable because it will avoid the additional 

 

2

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 78659 (Aug. 24, 2016).

3

 Rule 1102(a) states in relevant part: “Subject to such conditions as the Commission . . . shall deem appropriate, a 

plan for the administration of a Fair Fund . . . may provide for payment of funds into a court registry or to a courtappointed receiver in any case pending in federal or state court against a respondent or any other person based upon 

a complaint alleging violations arising from the same or substantially similar facts as those alleged in the 

Commission’s order instituting proceedings.” (emphasis added) 

4

See Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of WorldCom, Inc. v. SEC, 467 F.3d 73, 82 (2d Cir. 2006) (citing 

SEC v. Wang, 944 F.2d 80, 88 (2d Cir. 1991)). 
3

time inherent in implementing two distributions, reduce the duplication of distribution-related 

costs and expenses, and simplify the process for injured investors that would be required if two 

distributions were to take place. 

The Division now requests that the Commission approve the Plan and authorize the 

transfer of the CSAC Fair Fund to the court registry account established in the CGMI Action for 

distribution.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

A. Pursuant to Rule 1104 of the Rules,5the Plan is approved; and,

B. Pursuant to Rule 1102(a) of the Rules,6the Commission staff shall disburse the 

CSAC Fair Fund in the above-captioned proceeding to the court registry account 

established in the CGMI Action, for distribution to harmed investors in accordance 

with a plan of distribution to be approved by the court in the CGMI Action.

By the Commission.

Brent J. Fields

Secretary

 

5

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1104.

6

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1102(a).