alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §695b. Applicability of certain statutes

Sections 715g to 715i and 715l to 715n of this title are made applicable for the purposes of sections 695 to 695c of this title in the same manner and to the same extent as though they were enacted as part of sections 695 to 695c of this title, except that lands acquired hereunder may be administered primarily as wildlife management areas not subject to the prohibition against the taking of birds or nests or the eggs thereof, as contained in section 715i of this title, and hunting thereon may be regulated, at the option of the Fish and Game Commission of the State of California, in such cooperative manner as is deemed necessary to carry out the purposes of sections 695 to 695c of this title subject, however, to the provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of July 3, 1918 [16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.].

(May 18, 1948, ch. 303, §3, 62 Stat. 239.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Migratory Bird Treaty Act of July 3, 1918, referred to in text, is act July 3, 1918, ch. 128, 40 Stat. 755, which is classified generally to subchapter II of chapter 7 (§703 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 710 of this title and Tables.

Sections 715l and 715m of this title, referred to in text, were repealed by Pub. L. 89–669, §7(d), Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 930. See section 668d(f) and (e) of this title.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 72486 / June 26, 2014

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-15014

: 

In the Matter of :

: 

JP Turner & Company, :

LLC, and William L. Mello : EXTENSION ORDER

: 

Respondents. :

 :

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested a second extension of time,

until September 25, 2014, to submit a proposed Plan of Distribution under Rule 1101(a) of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans.

In its first request, the Division stated that since the issuance of the 

Commission’s September 10, 2012, Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to

Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 203(f) of the Investment

Advisers Act of 1940, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions1(“Order”)

against JP Turner and Company, LLC (“JP Turner”) and its former president, William L.

Mello, for their failure to establish policies and procedures designed to prevent and detect the

churning of customers’ accounts, the Division had learned that some of the customers harmed

by the violations described in the Order had entered into private arbitrations with JP Turner. 

The Commission granted the request and issued an Order extending the time to submit a 

proposed Plan of Distribution to May 15, 2013.2 The Division now is requesting a second 

extension because additional time is needed for further evaluation, analysis, and consultation to 

properly account for settlements reached by JP Turner with some of the customers harmed by 

the violations described in the Order, as the Division expects that such settlements will affect

 

1 Exchange Act Rel. No. 67808 (Sep. 10, 2012).

2 Exchange Act Rel. No. 68172 (Nov. 6, 2012).
the Division’s distribution. Furthermore, additional monies may be available for 

distribution as a result of a related, ongoing litigated administrative proceeding against four 

individual respondents. Additional time is needed for further evaluation, analysis, and 

consultation in order to determine the impact of the related case on the proposed 

distribution.

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s 

request for an extension of time until September 25, 2014 to submit a proposed Plan of

Distribution is granted.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Lynn M. Powalski

Deputy Secretary
Section 333 Petition for Exemption/Rulemaking on behalf of the Town of Marana, this 8 th 16 th day of September, 2015

To whom it may concern,

My name is Heath Vescovi

- Chiordi and I am a Management Assistant in the Town Manager’s Office for the Town of Marana, AZ, a local government entity in Southern Arizona. I am writing this letter in order to apply for a Civil COA by way of an Exemption under Section 333 regarding UAV/UAS s ystems. The Town of Marana is a government entity that delivers essential services to a population of approximately 42,000 over 128 square miles. The Town seeks to utilize the functions of a UAV for purposes of marketing, communications, planning, tourism , and economic development. The primary use of the UAV will be filming promotional videos for the Town, of the Town, in an effort to more actively brand and market the town as a destination for tourism , as part of the gateway to Southern Arizona . The UAV w ould also be used for the purposes of planning and GIS, solely through aerial photography to enhance our already

- existing databases. All of these efforts are part of the greater effort to increase the economic development viability of the Town as a whole.
As a government entity, we understand issues regarding privacy can be very sensitive. When utilizing the UAV for the purposes of photography and videography, all necessary steps will be taken to ensure the privacy of our resident and visitors is preserved

. Furthermore, all requisite legal documentation, including insurance and release forms for permission to be filmed for promotional purposes for the Town will be secured prior to any filming or photography. The specs of the UAV to be operated are as follo ws: the model is a DJI Phantom 3 professional. The weight, including battery and propellers is 1,280 grams. Diagonal size of the UAV, including propellers is 590mm. Max ascent speed is 5 m/s, while max descent speed is 3 m/s. Maximum speed clocks in at 16 m/s (ATTI mode with no wind). I t can fly to a max altitude of 6000 meters above sea level, and is equipped with GPS/GLONASS. (More information can be found here: http://www.dji.com/product/phantom

- 3 /spec Ag ain, the purpose of being granted this COA is to enhance the ability of our town to position itself better for overall economic development purposes through a combination of marketing, communications, planning, and tourism. We are not a commercial operation, and as such, we are not charging for any service, nor are we contracting our own services out in an effort to generate any sort of direct profit. Ourgoal as a town is to provide the most complete experience possible for our residents,

includin g delivery of essential services such as public safety, water and waste water services, as well as community events for the purposes of developing a community identity and cultivating a strong sense of place and belonging. The responsible operation of a UA V will allow Marana to lead the charge in innovation when it comes to economic development, as well as allow our efforts to grow the economy of Southern A rizona as a whole.
**Exhibit 12**
**The Gillette Company**
**Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**                     **Dollars in millions** **2004** **2003** **2002** **2001** **2000****Earnings:**                     Income from continuing operations before income taxes $2,384   1,964   1,752    1,342   1,288  Interest expense  54   54   84    145   223  Interest portion of rental expense  36   41   43    31   25  Amortization of capitalized interest  9   10   10    9   6                 Earnings available for fixed charges $2,483   2,069   1,889    1,527   1,542                 **Fixed Charges:**                     Interest expense $54   54   84    145   223  Interest capitalized  4   2   4    11   23  Interest portion of rental expense  36   41   43    31   25                 Total fixed charges $94   97   131    187   271                 **Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**  26.4   21.4   14.5    8.2   5.7
#### § 215.9 Temporary Worker Visa Exit Program.

An alien admitted on certain temporary worker visas at a port of entry participating in the Temporary Worker Visa Exit Program must also depart at the end of his or her authorized period of stay through a port of entry participating in the program and must present designated biographic and/or biometric information upon departure. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will publish a Notice in the Federal Register designating which temporary workers must participate in the Temporary Worker Visa Exit Program, which ports of entry are participating in the program, which biographical and/or biometric information would be required, and the format for submission of that information by the departing designated temporary workers.

[73 FR 78130, Dec. 19, 2008]
#### § 661.47 Can routine bridge maintenance be performed with TTFBP funds?

No. Routine bridge maintenance repairs, *e.g.,* guard rail repair, repair of traffic control devices, striping, cleaning scuppers, deck sweeping, snow and debris removal, etc., are not eligible uses of TTFBP funding. The U.S. Department of the Interior's annual allocation for maintenance as well as TTP construction funds are eligible funding sources for routine bridge maintenance.
### §521f. Costs of conveyance and value of improvements

Any person to whom lands are conveyed under sections 521c to 521i of this title shall bear all reasonable costs of administration, survey, and appraisal incidental to such conveyance, as determined by the Secretary. In determining the value of any lands or interest in lands to be conveyed under sections 521c to 521i of this title, the Secretary may, in those cases in which the Secretary determines it would be in the public interest, exclude from such determination the value of any improvements to the lands made by any person other than the Government. In the case of road rights-of-way conveyed under sections 521c to 521i of this title, the person to whom the right-of-way is conveyed shall reimburse the United States for the value of any improvements to such right-of-way which may have been made by the United States. The Secretary may, in those cases in which the Secretary determines that it would be in the public interest, waive payment by any person of costs incidental to any conveyance authorized by sections 521c to 521i of this title or reimbursement by any person for the value of improvements to rights-of-way otherwise required by this section.

(Pub. L. 97–465, §4, Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2536.)
(No. 82-CC-1564

#### Tamara L. Hammer, a/k/a Tamara L. Reed, Claimant, *v.*The State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 28, 1983.*

Donovan and Roberts, P.C., for Claimant.

Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General (Glen P. Larner, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

Poch, J.

This matter comes before the Court on the joint ■ stipulation of the parties, which states as follows:

1. That the instant claim seeks to recover for damage *to*Claimant’s automobile sustained on June 6, 1981, at the intersection of State Route 56 and Briggs Road in Du Page County.

*851
      *2.*That Respondent concedes liability for the accident and the damages sustained in the amount of $500.00.

3. That there are no disputed questions of fact.

4. That both parties waive hearing and the submission of briefs.

5. That no other evidence, oral or written, will be submitted to the Court.

6. That an award of $500.00 will constitute full and final satisfaction of the instant claim and any other claim arising out of the same occurrence.

Although the Court is not bound by a stipulation such as this, it is also not desirous of interposing a controversy where none appears to exist. As long as the stipulation appears reasonable and fair, we see no reason to question its validity or to force the parties to take the time and expense of proving facts which are not in dispute.

We find the stipulated facts to be sufficient to sustain a finding of liability on the part of Respondent and an award in the agreed amount.

- Claimant is hereby awarded the amount of $500.00 (five hundred dollars and no cents).
§ 490.507 National performance management measures for system performance. There are three performance measures to assess the performance of the Interstate System and the performance of the non-Interstate NHS for the purpose of carrying out the National Highway Performance Program (referred to collectively as the NHS Performance measures). ( a ) Two measures are used to assess reliability (referred to collectively as the Travel Time Reliability measures). They are: ( 1 ) Percent of the person-miles traveled on the Interstate that are reliable (referred to as the Interstate Travel Time Reliability measure); and
( 2 ) Percent of person-miles traveled on the non-Interstate NHS that are reliable (referred to as the Non-Interstate Travel Time Reliability measure).
( b ) One measure is used to assess GHG emissions, which is the percent change in tailpipe CO2 emissions on the NHS compared to the reference year (referred to as the GHG measure).
[82 FR 6031, Jan. 18, 2017, as amended at 83 FR 24936, May 31, 2018; 88 FR 85392, Dec. 7, 2023]
### §5724. Authority and responsibility

#### (a) Responsible management entity

The State of Alaska Department of Fish and Game shall be the responsible management entity for the United States for the purposes of any agreement with Canada regarding management of salmon stocks originating from the Yukon River in Canada.

#### (b) Effect of designation

The designation under subsection (a) shall not be considered to expand, diminish, or otherwise change the management authority of the State of Alaska or the Federal Government with respect to fishery resources.

#### (c) Recommendations of Panel

In addition to recommendations made by the Panel to the responsible management entities in accordance with any agreement with Canada regarding management of salmon stocks originating from the Yukon River in Canada, the Panel may make recommendations concerning the conservation and management of salmon originating in the Yukon River to the Department of the Interior, the Department of Commerce, the Department of State, the North Pacific Fishery Management Council, and other Federal or State entities as appropriate. Recommendations by the Panel shall be advisory in nature.

(Pub. L. 106–450, title II, §205, Nov. 7, 2000, 114 Stat. 1943.)
# Official Journal L 45/14 F

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 45 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5214 February 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 45

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5214 February 2009

---

| Contents | | II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | Commission |
| | | 2009/107/EC |
| | * | Commission Decision of 23 January 2009 amending Decisions 2006/861/EC and 2006/920/EC concerning technical specifications of interoperability relating to subsystems of the trans-European conventional rail system
  (notified under document number C(2009) 38)


   (1) | 1 |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Regulation No 100 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of battery electric vehicles with regard to specific requirements for the construction, functional safety and hydrogen emission (revision 2) | 17 |

Contents

II   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is not obligatory

page

DECISIONS

Commission

2009/107/EC

*

Commission Decision of 23 January 2009 amending Decisions 2006/861/EC and 2006/920/EC concerning technical specifications of interoperability relating to subsystems of the trans-European conventional rail system
  (notified under document number C(2009) 38)


   (1)

(notified under document number C(2009) 38)

1

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Regulation No 100 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of battery electric vehicles with regard to specific requirements for the construction, functional safety and hydrogen emission (revision 2)

17

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover) | s3 |

*

Note to the reader (see page 3 of the cover)

s3

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
### §47c. Acquisition of certain lands for preservation and consolidation of timber stands

For the purpose of preserving and consolidating certain timber stands along the western boundary of the Yosemite National Park, the President of the United States is authorized, upon the joint recommendation of the Secretaries of the Interior and of Agriculture, to add to said park by Executive proclamation any or all of the following-described lands: Sections 19, 20, 29, 30, 31, and 32, township 1 south, range 20 east, Mount Diablo meridian; east half section 1; east half section 12; southeast quarter section 24, township 2 south, range 19 east, Mount Diablo meridian; sections 4, 5, and 6; north half section 7; sections 8 and 9, and 19 and 20, township 2 south, range 20 east, Mount Diablo meridian, approximately nine thousand acres.

(Mar. 2, 1929, ch. 498, 45 Stat. 1486.)
#### Sharon J. Giardina, Appellant, v Richard J. Lippes et al., Respondents.

[824 NYS2d 834]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John M. Curran, J.), entered March 4, 2005 in a legal malpractice action. The order, among other things, granted in part defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by denying that part of the motion with respect to the underlying tachycardia claim and reinstating that claim and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for defendants’ alleged legal malpractice in representing her in an action to recover for injuries she allegedly sustained based on the application of toxic substances, including pesticides, on her lawn. We conclude that Supreme Court erred in granting that part of defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint with respect to plaintiffs underlying tachycardia claim, and we therefore modify the order accordingly. “In order to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, defendants had to present evidence in admissible form establishing that plaintiff! ] [is] unable to prove *1221at least one necessary element of a legal malpractice action” *(Potter v Polozie,*303 AD2d 943, 943 [2003]). Here, defendants failed to submit evidence in admissible form establishing that any alleged negligence on their part was not a proximate cause of damages with respect to plaintiffs underlying tachycardia claim *(see id.*at 944). Although plaintiff suffered from tachycardia prior to April 11, 1988, the only date of her alleged exposure to toxic substances not barred by the statute of limitations for the underlying action, it is well settled that aggravation of a preexisting condition is actionable *(see Owen v RochesterPenfield Bus Co.,*304 NY 457, 461 [1952]; *Martin v Volvo Cars of N. Am.,*241 AD2d 941, 943 [1997]). The failure of defendants to meet their initial burden of establishing as a matter of law that plaintiffs underlying tachycardia claim was wholly unrelated to plaintiffs alleged exposure to toxic substances on April 11, 1988 requires denial of that part of their motion with respect to that underlying claim, regardless of the sufficiency of plaintiffs opposing papers *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; *Owens v Niagara Falls Coach Lines,*16 AD3d 1164 [2005]). We have examined plaintiffs remaining contention and conclude that it is lacking in merit. Present— Hurlbutt, A.PJ., Martoche, Centra and Pine, JJ.
### §460rrr–8. Termination of Commission

The Commission shall terminate on the date that is 10 years after October 12, 2006.

(Pub. L. 109–337, §10, Oct. 12, 2006, 120 Stat. 1782.)
# Official Journal L 161/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 161 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6218 June 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 161

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6218 June 2019

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/981 of 8 March 2019 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 supplementing Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/981 of 8 March 2019 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 supplementing Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.