alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 91604 / April 16, 2021

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension, pursuant to 

Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, of trading in the securities of Electric Car 

Company, Inc. (“Electric Car” or the “Company”) (CIK # 0001391117), of Springfield, 

Missouri, at 9:30 a.m. EDT on April 19, 2021, and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 30, 

2021.

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of Electric Car because of 

questions regarding the adequacy and accuracy of information about the Company in the 

marketplace, and unusual and unexplained trading activity affecting the market for its securities. 

The Company has not filed any reports with the Commission since 2011 or otherwise released 

any information about its operations. Despite the absence of any publicly available news from 

the Company since 2011, Electric Car’s share price and trading volume have greatly increased

since January 2021. The increased share price and trading volume coincided with social media 

posts from late January onward that appear to be attempting to influence the market for the stock.

The Commission cautions broker-dealers, shareholders, and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by the company.

Further, brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Rule 15c2-11 under the 

Exchange Act, at the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered unless 

and until they have strictly complied with all of the provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer 

has any questions as to whether or not it has complied with the rule, it should not enter any 

quotation but immediately contact the staff in the Division of Trading and Markets, Office of 

Interpretation and Guidance, at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is 

required by Rule 15c2-11, it should refrain from entering quotations relating to Electric Car’s

securities until such time as it has familiarized himself with the rule and is certain that all of its 

provisions have been met. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of 

the rule, the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action. 

If any broker-dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, they 

should immediately contact Tracy L. Davis, Assistant Regional Director, San Francisco Regional 

Office, at (415) 705-2318, or Theis Finlev, Staff Attorney, San Francisco Regional Office, at 

(415) 705-2468.
<PAGE>
 
                                              HECO Exhibit 10.14(a)
                                              ---------------------



[ Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc. letterhead ]



                                              December 01, 1997



HAWAIIAN INTERISLAND TOWING, INC.
Attention:  Mr. Gordon Smith, President
Pier 21, Main Office
Honolulu, HI 96817

Dear Mr. Smith:

SUBJECT:  OPTION TO EXTEND TERM UNDER CONTRACT OF PRIVATE CARRIAGE BY AND
          BETWEEN HAWAIIAN INTERISLAND TOWING, INC. AND MAUI ELECTRIC COMPANY,
          LTD.

This letter will confirm the understanding between HAWAIIAN INTERISLAND TOWING,
INC. ("HITI") and Maui Electric Company, Ltd. ("MECO") relating to the extension
of the Contract Of Private Carriage by and between HITI and MECO, dated November
13, 1993 ("Contract").

It has been mutually agreed to by HITI and MECO that the Contract is hereby
extended in accordance with Section 1.2, "Option to Extend Term," as amended by
the "Sixth Amendment To Contract of Private Carriage By and Between HAWAIIAN
INTERISLAND TOWING, INC. and Maui Electric Company, Ltd.," dated October 1,
1997, for a period of two (2) years commencing January 1, 1998.

If this letter correctly sets forth our understanding and agreement, would you
please indicate your acceptance and agreement in the space below and return a
signed copy for our records.


HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., AS AGENT



By    /s/ Jeffrey C. Aicken
    ---------------------------------------------
      Jeffrey C. Aicken, Director, Fuel Resources



                                       1
<PAGE>
 
Accepted and agreed to this 1st day of December, 1997.



HAWAIIAN INTERISLAND TOWING, INC.



By    /s/ Gordon Smith
    -------------------------------------------------
     name: Gordon Smith               title: President



cc:  T.C. Simmons
     S.A. Gonsalves
     S. Kiyonaga



                                       2
The comparison between the two UAs is as follows from the DJI website: In the beginning of April, DJI Innovations has announced a new quadcopter – Phantom 3 which is upgraded version of the Vision+. 

### Key differences between DJI Phantom 2 Vision Pl us and DJI Phantom 3
Feature DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus v3.0 DJI Phantom 3 Weight (Battery & Propellers Included) 1242g 1280 g Hover Accuracy  Vertical: +/- 0,8m

 Horizontal: +/- 2,5m  Vertical: +/- 0,1m

 Horizontal: +/- 1m Max Ascent / Descent Speed  Ascent: 6m/s;

 Descent: 2m/s  Ascent: 5m/s;

 Descent: 3m/s Max Speed 15m/s 16m/s Battery DJI 5200mAh LiPo DJI 4480 mAh LiPo Max Flight Time 25 min 23 min

Camera  14 Megapixels

 Image Resolution: 4384×3288

 Video Recording:
o 1080p/1080i
o 720p

 Video Transmitting:
o 640×640 (30fps)
o 320×240 (15fps)  12 Megapixels

 Image Resolution: 4000×3000

 Video Recording: Phantom 3 Professional

 UHD: 4096x2160p 24/25, 3840x2160p 24/25/30

 FHD: 1920x1080p 24/25/30/48/50/60

 HD: 1280x720p 24/25/30/48/50/60 Controllable range 1 km (~0.6 mile) 2 km (~1.2 mile) Max Altitude (official) 304 m (~1000ft) 6000m (above the se a level; ~19685ft) Mobile App DJI Vision DJI Pilot “Follow me” mode No Yes
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Western   Financial
Corporation,  on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2001 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 751.7 Definitions. For purposes of this part, the following definitions shall apply: ( a ) *Junkyard.* ( 1 ) A Junkyard is an establishment or place of business which is maintained, operated or used for storing, keeping, buying, or selling junk, or for the maintenance or operation of an automobile graveyard. This definition includes scrap metal processors, auto-wrecking yards, salvage yards, scrap yards, autorecycling yards, used auto parts yards and temporary storage of automobile bodies and parts awaiting disposal as a normal part of a business operation when the business will continually have like materials located on the premises. The definition includes garbage dumps and sanitary landfills. The definition does not include litter, trash, and other debris scattered along or upon the highway, or temporary operations and outdoor storage of limited duration.
( 2 ) An Automobile Graveyard is an establishment or place of business which is maintained, used, or operated for storing, keeping, buying, or selling wrecked, scrapped, ruined, or dismantled motor vehicles or motor vehicle parts. Ten or more such vehicles will constitute an automobile graveyard.
( 3 ) An Illegal Junkyard is one which was established or is maintained in violation of State law.
( 4 ) A Nonconforming Junkyard is one which was lawfully established, but which does not comply with the provisions of State law or State regulations passed at a later date or which later fails to comply with State regulations due to changed conditions. Illegally established junkyards are not nonconforming junkyards.
( b ) *Junk.* Old or scrap metal, rope, rags, batteries, paper, trash, rubber, debris, waste, or junked, dismantled, or wrecked automobiles, or parts thereof.
( c ) *Main traveled way.* The traveled way of a highway on which through traffic is carried. In the case of a divided highway, the traveled way of each of the separated roadways for traffic in opposite directions is a main traveled way. It does not include such facilities as frontage roads, turning roadways, or parking areas.
( d ) *Industrial zones.* Those districts established by zoning authorities as being most appropriate for industry or manufacturing. A zone which simply permits certain industrial activities as an incident to the primary land use designation is not considered to be an industrial zone. The provisions of part 750, subpart G of this chapter relative to Outdoor Advertising Control shall apply insofar as industrial zones are concerned.
( e ) *Unzoned industrial areas.* An area where there is no zoning in effect and which is used primarily for industrial purposes as determined by the State and approved by the FHWA. An unzoned area cannot include areas which may have a rural zoning classification or land uses established by zoning variances or special exceptions.
[40 FR 8551, Feb. 28, 1975, as amended at 41 FR 9321, Mar. 4, 1976]
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 91589 / April 16, 2021

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-16753

In the Matter of

Signator Investors, Inc. and 

Gregory J. Mitchell; 

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 ORDER DIRECTING 

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING DISBURSEMENT OF FAIR FUND 

File No. 3-16754

In the Matter of

Cory D. Williams;

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 

On December 31, 2020, the Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority, published a Notice 

of Proposed Plan of Distribution and Opportunity for Comment (“Notice”),1 pursuant to Rule 

1103 of the Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans (“Commission’s 

Rules”).2 The Notice advised interested persons that they could obtain a copy of the Proposed 

Plan of Distribution (“Proposed Plan”) from the Commission’s public website or by submitting a 

written request to Noel Gittens, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 90836 (Dec. 31, 2020).

2

 17 C.F.R. § 201.1103.
2

Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-5876. The Notice also advised that all persons desiring to 

comment on the Proposed Plan could submit their comments, in writing, within 30 days of the 

Notice. The Commission received no comments on the Proposed Plan during the comment 

period. On February 11, 2021, the Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority, issued an order 

approving the Proposed Plan,3 and posted the approved Plan of Distribution (the “Plan”). 

The Plan provides for the distribution of the Fair Fund, plus accumulated interest, less 

taxes, fees, and expenses, to the harmed investors according to the methodology set forth in the 

Plan. 

Pursuant to the Plan, the Fund Administrator has compiled the payee information and 

prepared a payment file in a Commission-approved format. The Commission staff has reviewed 

the payment file and requests, pursuant to Rule 1101(b)(6) of the Commission’s Rules, 17 C.F.R. 

§ 201.1101(b)(6), that the Commission direct the payment of $975,788.48 from the Fair Fund to 

the Fair Fund’s escrow account at Alerus Financial, N.A. for distribution in accordance with the 

Plan. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, that Commission staff shall direct the payment of 

$975,788.48 from the Fair Fund to the Fair Fund’s escrow account at Alerus Financial, N.A. for

distribution in accordance with the Plan. 

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.4

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

3

 See Order Approving Plan of Distribution, Exchange Act Rel. No. 91111 (Feb. 11, 2021).

4

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(v).
§ 500.105 Requirements. ( a ) The metropolitan transportation planning process (23 U.S.C. 134 and 49 U.S.C. 5303-5005) in TMAs shall include a CMS that meets the requirements of § 500.109 of this regulation.
( b ) States shall develop, establish, and implement a TMS that meets the requirements of subpart B of this regulation.
( c ) Any of the management systems that the State chooses to implement under 23 U.S.C. 303 and this regulation shall be developed in cooperation with MPOs in metropolitan areas, affected agencies receiving assistance under the Federal Transit Act (49 U.S.C., Chapter 53), and other agencies (including private owners and operators) that have responsibility for operation of the affected transportation systems or facilities.
( d ) The results (e.g., policies, programs, projects, etc.) of any of the management systems that a State chooses to develop under 23 U.S.C. 303 and this regulation shall be considered in the development of metropolitan and statewide transportation plans and improvement programs and in making project selection decisions under title 23, U.S.C., and under the Federal Transit Act. Plans and programs adopted after September 30, 1997, shall demonstrate compliance with this requirement.
§ 71.21 Discovery. ( a ) The following types of discovery are authorized: ( 1 ) Requests for production of documents for inspection and copying;
( 2 ) Requests for admissions of the authenticity of any relevant document or of the truth of any relevant fact;
( 3 ) Written interrogatories; and
( 4 ) Depositions.
( b ) For the purpose of this section and §§ 71.22 and 71.23, the term “documents” includes information, documents, reports, answers, records, accounts, papers, and other data and documentary evidence. Nothing contained herein shall be interpreted to require the creation of a document.
( c ) Unless mutually agreed to by the parties, discovery is available only as ordered by the ALJ. The ALJ shall regulate the timing of discovery.
( d ) Motions for discovery are to be handled according to the following procedures: ( 1 ) A party seeking discovery may file a motion with the ALJ. Such a motion shall be accompanied by a copy of the requested discovery, or in the case of depositions, a summary of the scope of the proposed deposition.
( 2 ) Within ten days of service, a party may file an opposition to the motion and/or a motion for protective order as provided in § 71.24.
( 3 ) The ALJ may grant a motion for discovery only if he or she finds that the discovery sought ( i ) Is necessary for the expeditious, fair, and reasonable consideration of the issues;
( ii ) Is not unduly costly or burdensome;
( iii ) Will not unduly delay the proceeding; and
( iv ) Does not seek privileged information.
( 4 ) The burden of showing that discovery should be allowed is on the party seeking discovery.
( 5 ) The ALJ may grant discovery subject to a protective order under § 71.24.
( e ) Depositions are to be handled in the following manner: ( 1 ) If a motion for deposition is granted, the ALJ shall issue a subpoena for the deponent, which may require the deponent to produce documents. The subpoena shall specify the time and place at which the deposition will be held.
( 2 ) The party seeking to depose shall serve the subpoena in the manner prescribed in § 71.8.
( 3 ) The deponent may file with the ALJ within ten days of service a motion to quash the subpoena or a motion for a protective order.
( 4 ) The party seeking to depose shall provide for the taking of a verbatim transcript of the deposition, which it shall make available to all other parties for inspection and copying.
( f ) Each party shall bear its own costs of discovery.
----

----

----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                         |   |   |   |   |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/      George Metrakos     |   |   |   |   |
| George      Metrakos         |   |   |   |   |
| Chief      Financial Officer |   |   |   |   |
|                         |   |   |   |   |
Case 17-34665-KLP Doc 7294 Filed 09/27/19 Entered 09/27/19 14:53:49 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case 17-34665-KLP Doc 7294 Filed 09/27/19 Entered 09/27/19 14:53:49 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
HSPD-12 Implementation Status Report 

Updated Date: 

Number of Employees requiring PIV credentials* 

Number of Employees requiring a NACI (or at least equivalent) that have not previously undergone a background check* 

Number of Employees requiring a NACI (or at least equivalent) with background investigation in process* 

Number of Employees with completed/ adjudicated NACI (or equivalent background investigation)* 

Total Number of PIV credentials Issued to Employees* 

Number of Contractors requiring PIV credentials 

Number of Contractors requiring NACI (or at least equivalent) that have not previously undergone a background check 

Number of Contractors requiring a NACI (or at least equivalent) with background investigation in process 

Number of Contractors with completed/ adjudicated NACI (or equivalent background investigation) 

Sept. 2013 40 152 65 4108 3987 159 151 36 1603 

Implementation Plan Summary

[Planned Date of Full 

Implementation] 

12/31/2013

[Planned Total Number 

of NACIs to be 

verified/completed for 

current employees and 

contractors by Oct. 27, 

2007*] 

 NA

Next Major M

12/31/2013: Integration of PIV creden
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Hibernia
Corporation of our report dated January 16, 2002, included in the 2001
Annual Report to Shareholders of Hibernia Corporation.

We also consent to the incorporation
by reference in the following Hibernia Corporation Registration Statements

            Form S-3 No. 33-26553 (dated February 21, 1989) 
            Form S-8 No. 2-81353 (dated February 23, 1989)   
            Form S-8 No. 33-26871 (dated February 23, 1989)  
            Form S-3 No. 33-37701 (dated January 31, 1991)   
            Form S-8 No. 2-96194 (dated April 8, 1991)       
            Form S-3 No. 33-53108 (dated December 28, 1992)  
            Form S-3 No. 33-55844 (dated December 28, 1992)  
            Form S-8 No. 33-59743 (dated June 1, 1995)       
            Form S-3 No. 333-8133 (dated September 19, 1996) 
            Form S-8 No. 333-07761 (dated July 8, 1996)      
            Form S-8 No. 333-36017 (dated September 19, 1997)
            Form S-8 No. 333-56053 (dated June 4, 1998)      
            Form S-8 No. 333-83611 (dated July 23, 1999)     
            Form S-8 No. 333-65268 (dated July 17, 2001)     
            Form S-8 No. 333-65276 (dated July 17, 2001)

of our report dated
January 16, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Hibernia Corporation incorporated by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2001.

/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP

New Orleans, Louisiana
March 8, 2002
### §482c. Patents affecting forest lands

On and after May 11, 1934, all patents issued under the United States mining laws affecting lands within the Mount Hood National Forest within the State of Oregon shall convey title to the mineral deposits within the claim, together with the right to cut and remove so much of the timber therefrom as may be needed in extracting and removing the mineral deposits, if the timber is cut under sound principles of forest management as defined by the national-forest rules and regulations, but each patent shall reserve to the United States all title in or to the surface of the lands and products thereof, and no use of the surface of the claim or the resources therefrom not reasonably required for carrying on mining or prospecting shall be allowed except under the rules and regulations of the Forest Service.

(May 11, 1934, ch. 280, §2, 48 Stat. 773.)
# C_2019187EN.01002701.xml

| 3.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/27

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 March 2019 — River Kwai International Food Industry Co. Ltd v Association européenne des transformateurs de maïs doux (AETMD), Council of the European Union, European Commission

(Case C-144/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Dumping - Definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain prepared or preserved sweetcorn in kernels originating in Thailand - Interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009)

(2019/C 187/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: River Kwai International Food Industry Co. Ltd (represented by: F. Graafsma and J. Cornelis, advocaten)

Other parties to the proceedings: Association européenne des transformateurs de maïs doux (AETMD) (represented by: A. Willems and C. Zimmermann, avocats, and by S. De Knop, advocaat), Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Boelaert, acting as Agent), European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and A. Demeneix, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders River Kwai International Food Industry Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Association européenne des transformateurs de maïs doux (AETMD) and by the Council of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders River Kwai International Food Industry Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Association européenne des transformateurs de maïs doux (AETMD) and by the Council of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 23.4.2018.

---