# Official Journal C 95/28 F

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 95 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6528 February 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 95

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6528 February 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2022/C 95/01 | Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2022/C 95/01

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2022/C 95/02 | Case C-598/20: Order of the Court of 1 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Satversmes tiesa — Latvia) — Pilsētas zemes dienests AS (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Harmonisation of fiscal legislation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Exemptions — Article 135(1)(l) and Article 135(2) — Leasing and letting of immovable property — Exclusion from exemption of a compulsory land lease to owners of buildings — Principle of fiscal neutrality) | 2 |
| 2022/C 95/03 | Case C-602/20: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad — Bulgaria) — ‘AKZ — Burgas’ EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ — Burgas (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security contributions — Repayment of contributions wrongly paid — Limitation of interest on repayment — National procedural autonomy — Principle of equivalence — Principle of effectiveness — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Manifest inadmissibility) | 2 |
| 2022/C 95/04 | Case C-647/20: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — XG v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Direct taxation — Taxation of capital gains on immovable property — Articles 63, 64 and 65 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Higher tax liability on capital gains on immovable property made by residents of third countries) | 3 |
| 2022/C 95/05 | Case C-670/20: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Ráckevei Járásbíróság — Hungary) — EP, TA, FV, TB v ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Loan agreement denominated in a foreign currency — Terms exposing the borrower to a foreign exchange risk — Article 4(2) — Requirements of intelligibility and transparency — Lack of effect of the declaration by the consumer under which he or she is fully aware of the potential risks arising from a loan denominated in a foreign currency — Contractual term that is in plain, intelligible language) | 4 |
| 2022/C 95/06 | Case C-224/21: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — VX v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Direct taxation — Taxation of capital gains on immovable property — Articles 63 and 65 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Discrimination — Higher tax liability on capital gains on immovable property made by non-residents — Election for taxation under the same procedures as residents) | 4 |
| 2022/C 95/07 | Case C-273/21: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Törvényszék — Hungary) — WD v Agrárminiszter (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Agriculture — Common Agricultural Policy — Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 — Direct support schemes — Article 4(1)(c) and (e) — Article 32(2) — Single area payment application — Concept of ‘eligible hectare’ — Land classified as an aerodrome according to the land register — Actual use for agricultural purposes) | 5 |
| 2022/C 95/08 | Case C-516/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 20 August 2021 — Finanzamt X v Y | 6 |
| 2022/C 95/09 | Case C-599/21 P: Appeal brought on 21 September 2021 by AM.VI. Srl, Quinam Limited, the successor in law to Fashioneast Sàrl against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 14 July 2021 in Case T-297/20, Fashioneast and AM.VI. v EUIPO — Moschillo (RICH JOHN RICHMOND) | 6 |
| 2022/C 95/10 | Case C-612/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 30 September 2021 — Gmina O. v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej | 6 |
| 2022/C 95/11 | Case C-616/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 5 October 2021 — Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej v Gmina L. | 7 |
| 2022/C 95/12 | Case C-618/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 30 September 2021 — AR and Others v PK SA and Others | 7 |
| 2022/C 95/13 | Case C-628/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 11 October 2021 — TB | 9 |
| 2022/C 95/14 | Case C-642/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bihor (Romania) lodged on 18 October 2021 — P.C.H. v Parchetul de pe lângă Tribunalul Bihor, Parchetul de pe lângă Curtea de Apel Oradea and Ministerul Public — Parchetul de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție | 9 |
| 2022/C 95/15 | Case C-643/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bihor (Romania) lodged on 18 October 2021 — F.O.L. v Tribunalul Cluj | 10 |
| 2022/C 95/16 | Case C-644/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bihor (Romania) lodged on 18 October 2021 — M.I.A., P.R.-M., V.-C.I-C, F.C.R., P. (formerly T.) Ş-B., D.R., P.E.E. and F.I. v Tribunalul Cluj, Tribunalul Mureș, Tribunalul Hunedoara, Tribunalul Suceava and Tribunalul Galați | 11 |
| 2022/C 95/17 | Case C-645/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bihor (Romania) lodged on 21 October 2021 — C.C.C., C.R.R. and U.D.M. v Tribunalul Cluj, Tribunalul Satu Mare, Tribunalul București, Tribunalul Bistriţa-Năsăud, Tribunalul Maramureș and Tribunalul Sibiu | 12 |
| 2022/C 95/18 | Case C-667/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 8 November 2021 — ZQ v Medizinischer Dienst der Krankenversicherung Nordrhein, a body governed by public law | 13 |
| 2022/C 95/19 | Case C-723/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Cottbus (Germany) lodged on 29 November 2021 — Stadt Frankfurt (Oder) and FWA Frankfurter Wasser- und Abwassergesellschaft mbH v Landesamt für Bergbau, Geologie und Rohstoffe | 14 |
| 2022/C 95/20 | Case C-750/21 P: Appeal brought on 6 December 2021 by Pilatus Bank plc against the order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 24 September 2021 in Case T-139/19, Pilatus Bank v ECB | 16 |
| 2022/C 95/21 | Case C-751/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg (Austria) lodged on 7 December 2021 — PJ v Eurowings GmbH | 17 |
| 2022/C 95/22 | Case C-753/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 8 December 2021 — Instrubel NV v Montana Management Inc., BNP Paribas Securities Services | 18 |
| 2022/C 95/23 | Case C-754/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 8 December 2021 — Montana Management Inc. v Heerema Zwijndrecht BV, BNP Paribas Securities Services | 19 |
| 2022/C 95/24 | Case C-772/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 14 December 2021 — ‘Brink’s Lithuania’ UAB v Lietuvos bankas | 19 |
| 2022/C 95/25 | Case C-804/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus (Finland) lodged on 20 December 2021 — C and CD | 20 |
| | General Court |
| 2022/C 95/26 | Case T-209/15: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Gmina Kosakowo v Commission (State aid — Airport infrastructure — Public funding by the municipalities of Gdynia and Kosakowo for setting up the Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Advantage — Market economy operator principle — Effect on trade between Member States — Adverse effect on competition — Recovery — Obligation to state reasons) | 21 |
| 2022/C 95/27 | Case T-263/15 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Gmina Miasto Gdynia and Port Lotniczy Gdynia Kosakowo v Commission (State aid — Airport infrastructure — Public funding by the municipalities of Gdynia and Kosakowo for setting up the Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Advantage — Market economy operator principle — Effect on trade between Member States — Adverse effect on competition — Recovery — Withdrawal of a decision — Failure to re-open the formal investigation procedure — Procedural rights of the interested parties — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons) | 21 |
| 2022/C 95/28 | Case T-177/17: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — EKETA v Commission (Arbitration clause — Ask-it contract concluded under the Sixth Framework Programme — Eligible costs — Debit note issued by the Commission for the recovery of amounts advanced — Reliability of the time records — Conflict of interests — Subcontracting) | 22 |
| 2022/C 95/29 | Case T-189/17: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — EKETA v Commission (Arbitration clause — Humabio contract concluded under the Sixth Framework Programme — Eligible costs — Debit note issued by the Commission for the recovery of amounts advanced — Reliability of the time records — Conflict of interests) | 23 |
| 2022/C 95/30 | Case T-190/17: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — EKETA v Commission (Arbitration clause — Cater contract concluded under the Sixth Framework Programme — Eligible costs — Debit note issued by the Commission for the recovery of amounts advanced — Reliability of the time records — Conflict of interests) | 23 |
| 2022/C 95/31 | Joined Cases T-721/18 and T-81/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Apostolopoulou and Apostolopoulou-Chrysanthaki v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Grant agreements concluded in the context of various EU programmes — Breach of contractual terms by the beneficiary company — Eligible costs — OLAF investigation — Liquidation of the company — Recovery from the partners in the company — Enforcement — Allegations made by the representatives of the Commission before the national courts — Identification of the defendant — Failure to have regard to procedural requirements — Partial inadmissibility — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals) | 24 |
| 2022/C 95/32 | Case T-158/19: Judgment of the General Court of 15 December 2021 — Breyer v REA (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Horizon 2020 – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) — Regulation (EU) No 1290/2013 — Documents concerning the research project ‘iBorderCtrl: Intelligent Portable Border Control System’ — Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party — Partial refusal to grant access — Overriding public interest) | 24 |
| 2022/C 95/33 | Case T-703/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — DD v FRA (Action for damages — Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Initiation of an administrative inquiry — Article 86(2) of the Staff Regulations — Duty to provide information — Duration of the procedure — Reasonable time — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Confidentiality of the administrative inquiry — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Non-material damage — Causal link) | 25 |
| 2022/C 95/34 | Case T-795/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — HB v Commission (Public service contracts — Provision of technical assistance services to the High Judicial Council — Decision to reduce the amount of the contract and to recover the amounts already paid — Action for annulment and for damages — Act forming part of a purely contractual framework from which it is inseparable — No arbitration clause — Inadmissibility — No heads of damage that are separable from the contract) | 26 |
| 2022/C 95/35 | Case T-796/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — HB v Commission (Public service contracts — Provision of technical assistance services to the Ukrainian authorities — Decision to reduce the amount of the contract and to recover the amounts already paid — Action for annulment and for damages — Act forming part of a purely contractual framework from which it is inseparable — No arbitration clause — Inadmissibility — No heads of damage that are separable from the contract) | 27 |
| 2022/C 95/36 | Case T-870/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Worldwide Spirits Supply v EUIPO — Melfinco (CLEOPATRA QUEEN) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark CLEOPATRA QUEEN — Earlier national word mark CLEOPATRA MELFINCO — Articles 15 and 57 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Articles 18 and 64 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark — Declaration of invalidity) | 27 |
| 2022/C 95/37 | Case T-6/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Dr. Spiller v EUIPO — Rausch (Alpenrausch Dr. Spiller) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Alpenrausch Dr. Spiller — Earlier EU word mark RAUSCH — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 28 |
| 2022/C 95/38 | Case T-369/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 –EFFAS v EUIPO — CFA Institute (CEFA Certified European Financial Analyst) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark CEFA Certified European Financial Analyst — Earlier EU word mark CFA — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 29 |
| 2022/C 95/39 | Case T-381/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Datax v REA (Arbitration clause — Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — HELP and GreenNets grant agreements — OLAF’s investigation — Personnel costs — Burden of proof — Reliability of timesheets — Ineligibility of costs declared by the beneficiary — Request for recovery — Debit notes — Limitation — Reasonable time — Proportionality) | 29 |
| 2022/C 95/40 | Case T-549/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Magic Box Int. Toys v EUIPO — KMA Concepts (SUPERZINGS) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark SUPERZINGS — Earlier international figurative mark ZiNG — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 30 |
| 2022/C 95/41 | Case T-587/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — MO v Council (Civil service — Officials — Compulsory reassignment — 2019 Appraisal exercise — Right to be heard — Liability) | 30 |
| 2022/C 95/42 | Case T-598/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Skechers USA v EUIPO (ARCH FIT) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark ARCH FIT — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 31 |
| 2022/C 95/43 | Case T-699/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Fashion Energy v EUIPO — Retail Royalty (1st AMERICAN) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark 1st AMERICAN — Earlier EU figurative mark representing an eagle or other bird of prey — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Phonetic similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) | 32 |
| 2022/C 95/44 | Case T-159/21: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Bustos v EUIPO — Bicicletas Monty (motwi) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark motwi — Earlier national word mark MONTY — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 32 |
| 2022/C 95/45 | Case T-194/21: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Fidia farmaceutici v EUIPO — Stelis Biopharma (HYALOSTEL ONE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International figurative registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark HYALOSTEL ONE — Earlier EU word mark HYALISTIL and earlier figurative mark HyalOne — Earlier international word mark HYALO — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons) | 33 |
| 2022/C 95/46 | Case T-195/21: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Klymenko v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection) | 34 |
| 2022/C 95/47 | Case T-495/14: Order of the General Court of 17 December 2021 — Theodorakis and Theodoraki v Council (Non-contractual liability — Economic and monetary policy — Stability support programme for the Republic of Cyprus — Statements of the Euro Group of 16 and 25 March 2013 concerning Cyprus — Statement of the President of the Euro Group of 21 March 2013 concerning Cyprus — Incorrect identification of the defendant — Manifest inadmissibility) | 34 |
| 2022/C 95/48 | Case T-496/14: Order of the General Court of 17 December 2021 — Berry Investments v Council (Non-contractual liability — Economic and monetary policy — Stability support programme for the Republic of Cyprus — Statements of the Euro Group of 16 and 25 March 2013 concerning Cyprus — Statement of the President of the Euro Group of 21 March 2013 concerning Cyprus — Incorrect identification of the defendant — Manifest inadmissibility) | 35 |
| 2022/C 95/49 | Case T-355/19 INTP: Order of the General Court of 30 November 2021 — CE v Committee of the Regions (Procedure — Interpretation of a judgment — Inadmissibility) | 36 |
| 2022/C 95/50 | Case T-620/20: Order of the General Court of 8 December 2021 — Alessio and Others v ECB (Action for annulment — Economic and monetary union — Banking union — Recovery and resolution of credit institutions — Early intervention measures — Decision of the ECB to place Banca Carige under temporary administration — Subsequent extension decisions — Time limit for bringing proceedings — Delay — Inadmissibility) | 36 |
| 2022/C 95/51 | Case T-303/21: Order of the General Court of 2 December 2021 — FC v EASO (Action for annulment — Civil Service — Temporary staff — Disciplinary proceedings — Applications for suspension — Summons to attend a hearing before the Disciplinary Board — Postponement of the date of the hearing — No act adversely affecting the applicant — Premature action — Manifest inadmissibility) | 37 |
| 2022/C 95/52 | Case T-722/21 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 8 December 2021 — D’Amato and Others v Parliament (Application for interim measures — Members of Parliament — Conditions of access to the Parliament’s buildings at its three places of work in connection with the health crisis — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency) | 37 |
| 2022/C 95/53 | Case T-723/21 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 8 December 2021 — Rooken and Others v Parliament (Application for interim measures — Members of Parliament — Conditions of access to the Parliament’s buildings at its three places of work in connection with the health crisis — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency) | 38 |
| 2022/C 95/54 | Case T-724/21 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 8 December 2021 — IL and Others v Parliament (Application for interim measures — Civil Service — Conditions of access to the Parliament’s buildings at its three places of work in connection with the health crisis — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency) | 38 |
| 2022/C 95/55 | Case T-764/21: Action brought on 8 December 2021 — Atesos medical and Others v Commission | 39 |
| 2022/C 95/56 | Case T-780/21: Action brought on 14 December 2021 — Lila Rossa Engros v EUIPO (LiLAC) | 40 |
| 2022/C 95/57 | Case T-16/22: Action brought on 10 January 2022 — NV v EIB | 40 |
| 2022/C 95/58 | Case T-19/22: Action brought on 11 January 2022 — Piaggio & C. v EUIPO — Zhejiang Zhongneng Industry (Shape of a scooter) | 41 |
| 2022/C 95/59 | Case T-20/22: Action brought on 12 January 2022 — NW v Commission | 42 |
| 2022/C 95/60 | Case T-21/22: Action brought on 12 January 2022 — NY v Commission | 43 |
| 2022/C 95/61 | Case T-23/22: Action brought on 11 January 2022 — Grail v Commission | 43 |
| 2022/C 95/62 | Case T-25/22: Action brought on 17 January 2022 — Canai Technology/EUIPO — WE Brand (HE&ME) | 44 |
| 2022/C 95/63 | Case T-848/19: Order of the General Court of 20 December 2021 — HS v Commission | 45 |
| 2022/C 95/64 | Case T-765/20: Order of the General Court of 16 December 2021 — The Floow v Commission | 45 |
| 2022/C 95/65 | Case T-46/21: Order of the General Court of 7 December 2021 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Yajun (PREMILITY) | 45 |
| 2022/C 95/66 | Case T-519/21: Order of the General Court of 8 December 2021 — VY v Commission | 46 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2022/C 95/02

Case C-598/20: Order of the Court of 1 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Satversmes tiesa — Latvia) — Pilsētas zemes dienests AS (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Harmonisation of fiscal legislation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Exemptions — Article 135(1)(l) and Article 135(2) — Leasing and letting of immovable property — Exclusion from exemption of a compulsory land lease to owners of buildings — Principle of fiscal neutrality)

2

2022/C 95/03

Case C-602/20: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad — Bulgaria) — ‘AKZ — Burgas’ EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ — Burgas (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security contributions — Repayment of contributions wrongly paid — Limitation of interest on repayment — National procedural autonomy — Principle of equivalence — Principle of effectiveness — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Manifest inadmissibility)

2

2022/C 95/04

Case C-647/20: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — XG v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Direct taxation — Taxation of capital gains on immovable property — Articles 63, 64 and 65 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Higher tax liability on capital gains on immovable property made by residents of third countries)

3

2022/C 95/05

Case C-670/20: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Ráckevei Járásbíróság — Hungary) — EP, TA, FV, TB v ERSTE Bank Hungary Zrt. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Loan agreement denominated in a foreign currency — Terms exposing the borrower to a foreign exchange risk — Article 4(2) — Requirements of intelligibility and transparency — Lack of effect of the declaration by the consumer under which he or she is fully aware of the potential risks arising from a loan denominated in a foreign currency — Contractual term that is in plain, intelligible language)

4

2022/C 95/06

Case C-224/21: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — VX v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Direct taxation — Taxation of capital gains on immovable property — Articles 63 and 65 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Discrimination — Higher tax liability on capital gains on immovable property made by non-residents — Election for taxation under the same procedures as residents)

4

2022/C 95/07

Case C-273/21: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 November 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Törvényszék — Hungary) — WD v Agrárminiszter (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Agriculture — Common Agricultural Policy — Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 — Direct support schemes — Article 4(1)(c) and (e) — Article 32(2) — Single area payment application — Concept of ‘eligible hectare’ — Land classified as an aerodrome according to the land register — Actual use for agricultural purposes)

5

2022/C 95/08

Case C-516/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 20 August 2021 — Finanzamt X v Y

6

2022/C 95/09

Case C-599/21 P: Appeal brought on 21 September 2021 by AM.VI. Srl, Quinam Limited, the successor in law to Fashioneast Sàrl against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 14 July 2021 in Case T-297/20, Fashioneast and AM.VI. v EUIPO — Moschillo (RICH JOHN RICHMOND)

6

2022/C 95/10

Case C-612/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 30 September 2021 — Gmina O. v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej

6

2022/C 95/11

Case C-616/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 5 October 2021 — Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej v Gmina L.

7

2022/C 95/12

Case C-618/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 30 September 2021 — AR and Others v PK SA and Others

7

2022/C 95/13

Case C-628/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 11 October 2021 — TB

9

2022/C 95/14

Case C-642/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bihor (Romania) lodged on 18 October 2021 — P.C.H. v Parchetul de pe lângă Tribunalul Bihor, Parchetul de pe lângă Curtea de Apel Oradea and Ministerul Public — Parchetul de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție

9

2022/C 95/15

Case C-643/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bihor (Romania) lodged on 18 October 2021 — F.O.L. v Tribunalul Cluj

10

2022/C 95/16

Case C-644/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bihor (Romania) lodged on 18 October 2021 — M.I.A., P.R.-M., V.-C.I-C, F.C.R., P. (formerly T.) Ş-B., D.R., P.E.E. and F.I. v Tribunalul Cluj, Tribunalul Mureș, Tribunalul Hunedoara, Tribunalul Suceava and Tribunalul Galați

11

2022/C 95/17

Case C-645/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bihor (Romania) lodged on 21 October 2021 — C.C.C., C.R.R. and U.D.M. v Tribunalul Cluj, Tribunalul Satu Mare, Tribunalul București, Tribunalul Bistriţa-Năsăud, Tribunalul Maramureș and Tribunalul Sibiu

12

2022/C 95/18

Case C-667/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 8 November 2021 — ZQ v Medizinischer Dienst der Krankenversicherung Nordrhein, a body governed by public law

13

2022/C 95/19

Case C-723/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Cottbus (Germany) lodged on 29 November 2021 — Stadt Frankfurt (Oder) and FWA Frankfurter Wasser- und Abwassergesellschaft mbH v Landesamt für Bergbau, Geologie und Rohstoffe

14

2022/C 95/20

Case C-750/21 P: Appeal brought on 6 December 2021 by Pilatus Bank plc against the order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 24 September 2021 in Case T-139/19, Pilatus Bank v ECB

16

2022/C 95/21

Case C-751/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg (Austria) lodged on 7 December 2021 — PJ v Eurowings GmbH

17

2022/C 95/22

Case C-753/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 8 December 2021 — Instrubel NV v Montana Management Inc., BNP Paribas Securities Services

18

2022/C 95/23

Case C-754/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 8 December 2021 — Montana Management Inc. v Heerema Zwijndrecht BV, BNP Paribas Securities Services

19

2022/C 95/24

Case C-772/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 14 December 2021 — ‘Brink’s Lithuania’ UAB v Lietuvos bankas

19

2022/C 95/25

Case C-804/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus (Finland) lodged on 20 December 2021 — C and CD

20

General Court

2022/C 95/26

Case T-209/15: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Gmina Kosakowo v Commission (State aid — Airport infrastructure — Public funding by the municipalities of Gdynia and Kosakowo for setting up the Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Advantage — Market economy operator principle — Effect on trade between Member States — Adverse effect on competition — Recovery — Obligation to state reasons)

21

2022/C 95/27

Case T-263/15 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Gmina Miasto Gdynia and Port Lotniczy Gdynia Kosakowo v Commission (State aid — Airport infrastructure — Public funding by the municipalities of Gdynia and Kosakowo for setting up the Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Advantage — Market economy operator principle — Effect on trade between Member States — Adverse effect on competition — Recovery — Withdrawal of a decision — Failure to re-open the formal investigation procedure — Procedural rights of the interested parties — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons)

21

2022/C 95/28

Case T-177/17: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — EKETA v Commission (Arbitration clause — Ask-it contract concluded under the Sixth Framework Programme — Eligible costs — Debit note issued by the Commission for the recovery of amounts advanced — Reliability of the time records — Conflict of interests — Subcontracting)

22

2022/C 95/29

Case T-189/17: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — EKETA v Commission (Arbitration clause — Humabio contract concluded under the Sixth Framework Programme — Eligible costs — Debit note issued by the Commission for the recovery of amounts advanced — Reliability of the time records — Conflict of interests)

23

2022/C 95/30

Case T-190/17: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — EKETA v Commission (Arbitration clause — Cater contract concluded under the Sixth Framework Programme — Eligible costs — Debit note issued by the Commission for the recovery of amounts advanced — Reliability of the time records — Conflict of interests)

23

2022/C 95/31

Joined Cases T-721/18 and T-81/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Apostolopoulou and Apostolopoulou-Chrysanthaki v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Grant agreements concluded in the context of various EU programmes — Breach of contractual terms by the beneficiary company — Eligible costs — OLAF investigation — Liquidation of the company — Recovery from the partners in the company — Enforcement — Allegations made by the representatives of the Commission before the national courts — Identification of the defendant — Failure to have regard to procedural requirements — Partial inadmissibility — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals)

24

2022/C 95/32

Case T-158/19: Judgment of the General Court of 15 December 2021 — Breyer v REA (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Horizon 2020 – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) — Regulation (EU) No 1290/2013 — Documents concerning the research project ‘iBorderCtrl: Intelligent Portable Border Control System’ — Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party — Partial refusal to grant access — Overriding public interest)

24

2022/C 95/33

Case T-703/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — DD v FRA (Action for damages — Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Initiation of an administrative inquiry — Article 86(2) of the Staff Regulations — Duty to provide information — Duration of the procedure — Reasonable time — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Confidentiality of the administrative inquiry — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Non-material damage — Causal link)

25

2022/C 95/34

Case T-795/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — HB v Commission (Public service contracts — Provision of technical assistance services to the High Judicial Council — Decision to reduce the amount of the contract and to recover the amounts already paid — Action for annulment and for damages — Act forming part of a purely contractual framework from which it is inseparable — No arbitration clause — Inadmissibility — No heads of damage that are separable from the contract)

26

2022/C 95/35

Case T-796/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — HB v Commission (Public service contracts — Provision of technical assistance services to the Ukrainian authorities — Decision to reduce the amount of the contract and to recover the amounts already paid — Action for annulment and for damages — Act forming part of a purely contractual framework from which it is inseparable — No arbitration clause — Inadmissibility — No heads of damage that are separable from the contract)

27

2022/C 95/36

Case T-870/19: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Worldwide Spirits Supply v EUIPO — Melfinco (CLEOPATRA QUEEN) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark CLEOPATRA QUEEN — Earlier national word mark CLEOPATRA MELFINCO — Articles 15 and 57 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Articles 18 and 64 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark — Declaration of invalidity)

27

2022/C 95/37

Case T-6/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Dr. Spiller v EUIPO — Rausch (Alpenrausch Dr. Spiller) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Alpenrausch Dr. Spiller — Earlier EU word mark RAUSCH — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

28

2022/C 95/38

Case T-369/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 –EFFAS v EUIPO — CFA Institute (CEFA Certified European Financial Analyst) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark CEFA Certified European Financial Analyst — Earlier EU word mark CFA — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

29

2022/C 95/39

Case T-381/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Datax v REA (Arbitration clause — Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — HELP and GreenNets grant agreements — OLAF’s investigation — Personnel costs — Burden of proof — Reliability of timesheets — Ineligibility of costs declared by the beneficiary — Request for recovery — Debit notes — Limitation — Reasonable time — Proportionality)

29

2022/C 95/40

Case T-549/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Magic Box Int. Toys v EUIPO — KMA Concepts (SUPERZINGS) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark SUPERZINGS — Earlier international figurative mark ZiNG — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

30

2022/C 95/41

Case T-587/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — MO v Council (Civil service — Officials — Compulsory reassignment — 2019 Appraisal exercise — Right to be heard — Liability)

30

2022/C 95/42

Case T-598/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Skechers USA v EUIPO (ARCH FIT) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark ARCH FIT — Absolute grounds for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

31

2022/C 95/43

Case T-699/20: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Fashion Energy v EUIPO — Retail Royalty (1st AMERICAN) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark 1st AMERICAN — Earlier EU figurative mark representing an eagle or other bird of prey — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Phonetic similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

st

st

32

2022/C 95/44

Case T-159/21: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Bustos v EUIPO — Bicicletas Monty (motwi) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark motwi — Earlier national word mark MONTY — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

32

2022/C 95/45

Case T-194/21: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Fidia farmaceutici v EUIPO — Stelis Biopharma (HYALOSTEL ONE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International figurative registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark HYALOSTEL ONE — Earlier EU word mark HYALISTIL and earlier figurative mark HyalOne — Earlier international word mark HYALO — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons)

33

2022/C 95/46

Case T-195/21: Judgment of the General Court of 21 December 2021 — Klymenko v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection)

34

2022/C 95/47

Case T-495/14: Order of the General Court of 17 December 2021 — Theodorakis and Theodoraki v Council (Non-contractual liability — Economic and monetary policy — Stability support programme for the Republic of Cyprus — Statements of the Euro Group of 16 and 25 March 2013 concerning Cyprus — Statement of the President of the Euro Group of 21 March 2013 concerning Cyprus — Incorrect identification of the defendant — Manifest inadmissibility)

34

2022/C 95/48

Case T-496/14: Order of the General Court of 17 December 2021 — Berry Investments v Council (Non-contractual liability — Economic and monetary policy — Stability support programme for the Republic of Cyprus — Statements of the Euro Group of 16 and 25 March 2013 concerning Cyprus — Statement of the President of the Euro Group of 21 March 2013 concerning Cyprus — Incorrect identification of the defendant — Manifest inadmissibility)

35

2022/C 95/49

Case T-355/19 INTP: Order of the General Court of 30 November 2021 — CE v Committee of the Regions (Procedure — Interpretation of a judgment — Inadmissibility)

36

2022/C 95/50

Case T-620/20: Order of the General Court of 8 December 2021 — Alessio and Others v ECB (Action for annulment — Economic and monetary union — Banking union — Recovery and resolution of credit institutions — Early intervention measures — Decision of the ECB to place Banca Carige under temporary administration — Subsequent extension decisions — Time limit for bringing proceedings — Delay — Inadmissibility)

36

2022/C 95/51

Case T-303/21: Order of the General Court of 2 December 2021 — FC v EASO (Action for annulment — Civil Service — Temporary staff — Disciplinary proceedings — Applications for suspension — Summons to attend a hearing before the Disciplinary Board — Postponement of the date of the hearing — No act adversely affecting the applicant — Premature action — Manifest inadmissibility)

37

2022/C 95/52

Case T-722/21 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 8 December 2021 — D’Amato and Others v Parliament (Application for interim measures — Members of Parliament — Conditions of access to the Parliament’s buildings at its three places of work in connection with the health crisis — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency)

37

2022/C 95/53

Case T-723/21 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 8 December 2021 — Rooken and Others v Parliament (Application for interim measures — Members of Parliament — Conditions of access to the Parliament’s buildings at its three places of work in connection with the health crisis — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency)

38

2022/C 95/54

Case T-724/21 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 8 December 2021 — IL and Others v Parliament (Application for interim measures — Civil Service — Conditions of access to the Parliament’s buildings at its three places of work in connection with the health crisis — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency)

38

2022/C 95/55

Case T-764/21: Action brought on 8 December 2021 — Atesos medical and Others v Commission

39

2022/C 95/56

Case T-780/21: Action brought on 14 December 2021 — Lila Rossa Engros v EUIPO (LiLAC)

40

2022/C 95/57

Case T-16/22: Action brought on 10 January 2022 — NV v EIB

40

2022/C 95/58

Case T-19/22: Action brought on 11 January 2022 — Piaggio & C. v EUIPO — Zhejiang Zhongneng Industry (Shape of a scooter)

41

2022/C 95/59

Case T-20/22: Action brought on 12 January 2022 — NW v Commission

42

2022/C 95/60

Case T-21/22: Action brought on 12 January 2022 — NY v Commission

43

2022/C 95/61

Case T-23/22: Action brought on 11 January 2022 — Grail v Commission

43

2022/C 95/62

Case T-25/22: Action brought on 17 January 2022 — Canai Technology/EUIPO — WE Brand (HE&ME)

44

2022/C 95/63

Case T-848/19: Order of the General Court of 20 December 2021 — HS v Commission

45

2022/C 95/64

Case T-765/20: Order of the General Court of 16 December 2021 — The Floow v Commission

45

2022/C 95/65

Case T-46/21: Order of the General Court of 7 December 2021 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Yajun (PREMILITY)

45

2022/C 95/66

Case T-519/21: Order of the General Court of 8 December 2021 — VY v Commission

46

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN