alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

   <ARTICLE> 5
   <LEGEND>  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
   FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997, THE
   CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
   1997; AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
   STATEMENTS.
   </LEGEND>
   <MULTIPLIER>1,000
          
   <S>                                  <C>
   <PERIOD-TYPE>                        YEAR
   <FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
   <PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1997
   <CASH>                               9,696
   <SECURITIES>                             0
   <RECEIVABLES>                       13,750
   <ALLOWANCES>                         1,570
   <INVENTORY>                          9,876
   <CURRENT-ASSETS>                    33,386
   <PP&E>                               7,529
   <DEPRECIATION>                       4,729
   <TOTAL-ASSETS>                      37,348
   <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               12,885
   <BONDS>                                  0
   <COMMON>                             2,771
   <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
   <PREFERRED>                              0
   <OTHER-SE>                          19,331
   <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        37,348
   <SALES>                             39,037
   <TOTAL-REVENUES>                    39,037
   <CGS>                               20,710
   <TOTAL-COSTS>                       37,228
   <OTHER-EXPENSES>                        80
   <LOSS-PROVISION>                       265
   <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      95
   <INCOME-PRETAX>                      1,634
   <INCOME-TAX>                           297
   <INCOME-CONTINUING>                  1,337
   <DISCONTINUED>                       4,962
   <EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
   <CHANGES>                                0
   <NET-INCOME>                         6,299
   <EPS-PRIMARY>                         2.17
   <EPS-DILUTED>                         1.96
           
   
</TABLE>
#### § 72.4 Where sex offenders must register.

A sex offender must register, and keep the registration current, in each jurisdiction in which the offender resides, is an employee, or is a student. For initial registration purposes only, a sex offender must also register in the jurisdiction in which convicted if that jurisdiction is different from the jurisdiction of residence.
conducted a rote recitation of the factors, the record reveals that the 

victim's mother and sister testified at sentencing regarding the impact of 

the crime on the family and the district court made note of their pain, 

sorrow, and loss. The district court heard from defense counsel regarding 

appellant's criminal history and substance abuse and from the State 

regarding the facts and circumstances of the crime. We conclude that the 

record demonstrates that the district court considered all the factors set 

forth in NRS 193.165(1) and provides sufficient justification for the 

sentence imposed. Therefore, appellant failed to demonstrate plain error, 

and we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

Hardesty 

.Cttl oz_ , 

Parraguirre 

cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge 

Washoe County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

,J. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) I 947A 

2
###### Editorial Note on Part 1240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1240 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10355, Mar. 3, 2003.

#### § 1240.45 Postponement and adjournment of hearing.

After the commencement of the hearing, the immigration judge may grant a reasonable adjournment either at his or her own instance or, for good cause shown, upon application by the respondent or the Service.
(54 South. 932.)

No. 18,740.

#### STATE ex rel. HODGES v. JOYCE, Registrar of Voters, et al.

(April 10, 1911.)

*(Syllabus by the Court.)*

Elections (§ 73*) — Qualifications oe Voters — Residence.

An actual bona fide residence for the purpose of registration is not lost by temporary absence of the voter while employed in work elsewhere.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Elections, Cent. Dig. §§ 69, 70; Dec. Dig. § 73.*]

Appeal from Tenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Concordia ; John S. Boatner, Judge.

Proceeding by rule by the State, on the relation of A. J. Hodges, against John J. Joyce, Registrar of Voters, and another. Judgment for defendants, and relator appeals.

Affirmed.

Calhoun *&*Calhoun, for appellant. John S. Boatner, Jr., for appellee Cannon.

LAND, J.

This is a proceeding by rule to have erased from the registration roll of the Ferriday precinct the name of the defendant John J. Cannon, on the ground of the want of proper qualification as to residence.

There was judgment for the defendant, and the relator has appealed. John J. Cannon is a *young man who*attained his majority on February 20,1911. He has been living in Ferriday several years, but on December 20, 1911, he went to Mississippi to work under a section foreman, who was supervising the repair of railroad tracks. Defendant’s abode in Mississippi has been a box car, stationary only for a day or two.

While in Ferriday, the defendant lived with an elder brother, who was ear inspector. They occupied a stationary box car, which had been partitioned off so as to serve the purposes of a dwelling. The defendant’s father has lived in the same box car for six months or more. While this kind of nn *435abode is rather unusual, it has served all the purposes of a dwelling, and the contention has been narrowed down to the question whether the defendant, by going to Mississippi has abandoned his residence in Ferriday; and the solution of the question depends on the answer to the inquiry whether the absence of the defendant is temporary ■or permanent in its nature. Defendant frankly testified that be expected to remain in Mississippi as long as be could hold his present job, but would return to his home at Ferriday if he lost his job, or got sick, or could obtain a better job in Louisiana. Defendant left bis trunk and part of bis clothing in Ferriday, which be calls “home.” He has no other abode in this state.

The trial judge found that the defendant had not changed, nor intended to change, his residence, and we cannot say that his finding is manifestly erroneous on the face of the record.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit   23

Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Hibernia
Corporation of our report dated January 15, 2004, included in the 2003
Annual Report to Shareholders of Hibernia Corporation.

We also consent to the incorporation
by reference in the following Hibernia Corporation Registration Statements:

            Form S-3 No. 33-26553 (dated February 21, 1989) 
            Form S-8 No. 2-81353 (dated February 23, 1989)   
            Form S-8 No. 33-26871 (dated February 23, 1989)  
            Form S-3 No. 33-37701 (dated January 31, 1991)   
            Form S-8 No. 2-96194 (dated April 8, 1991)       
            Form S-3 No. 33-53108 (dated December 28, 1992)  
            Form S-3 No. 33-55844 (dated December 28, 1992)  
            Form S-8 No. 33-59743 (dated June 1, 1995)       
            Form S-8 No. 333-07761 (dated July 8, 1996)      
            Form S-8 No. 333-36017 (dated September 19, 1997)
            Form S-8 No. 333-56053 (dated June 4, 1998)      
            Form S-8 No. 333-83611 (dated July 23, 1999)     
            Form S-8 No. 333-65268 (dated July 17, 2001)     
            Form S-8 No. 333-65276 (dated July 17, 2001)     
            Form S-8 No. 333-85350 (dated April 2, 2002)     
            Form S-8 No. 333-102158 (dated December 23, 2002)
            Form S-3 No. 333-102488 (dated January 13, 2003) 
            Form S-8 No. 333-105790 (dated June 3, 2003)

of our report dated
January 15, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Hibernia Corporation incorporated by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2003.

/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP

New Orleans, Louisiana
February 27, 2004
#### Prompt Trading Corporation v. Weissman *&*Raymond, Inc., et al.

Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-18-00443- CR
Exavier Rhysen Ruf

fi n, App ellant
v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F B ELL COUNTY , 426 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 708 80, H ONO RAB LE MARTH A J. TRUDO , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Ex avier Rhy sen Ruffin s eeks to appea l his May 1, 2017 judgme nt of conviction. The thirty -day

deadline f

or per fec ting the a

ppeal was May 31, 2017, and the de adline for filing a n
ex t en s i o n of time to file the notice of appea l was J une 15, 2017. See Tex. R. App. P. 26
. 2 (a )( 1 ), 26.3. Howeve r, R

uffin did not file hi s notice of appea l until J une 5, 2018, and he did not file any extension of tim e to file his notice of appea l. Under the circ umstances, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of this purported appea l in any manner other than by dismiss ing it for want ofjurisdiction. See Olivo v. State , 918 S.W .2d 519, 522–23 (T ex. Crim. App. 1996) (conc luding that when belated notice of appea l is filed without timely motion for extension of time to file notice of appea l, appellate court must dismiss purported appea l for lack of jurisdiction); see also Slaton v. State , 981 S.W .2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App.1998) (holding that am en d m ents to rules of appellate proce dure did not aff ect Olivo ’s rationale requiringtimely

notice of a

ppeal to vest a

ppellate c ourt with jurisdiction). The a ppeal is dismissed for wa nt of jurisdiction.

_________________________________________ J eff Rose, Chief J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice Rose, Jus tices Pemberton a nd Field Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Jul y

18, 2018 Do Not Publish

2
EXHIBIT 32.2

The following certification accompanies North Bay Bancorps Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and is not filed as provided in SEC Release Nos.  33-8212, 34-47551 and IC 25967, dated March 21, 2003.



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q  of North Bay Bancorp for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, I, Michael W. Wengel, Execcutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of North Bay Bancorp, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of North Bay Bancorp for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q  of North Bay Bancorp for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of North Bay Bancorp.



Dated:  November 8, 2006



/s/  Michael W. Wengel

Michael W. Wengel

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer







38
!"#$""!


	



	
%%&%
'


			
		
 	
		
!	"

	
	#
	  	
	$
#	

 #	%%&'	
	#
	 	(	
	)#	*
	$+	,	-#
.	
#/	
	
	

%&01%&	
		
 	
	2(30345(



	
		
"

	/		

 
6	
	
7	
	8	

//	  	
	

$
#	 #	%%&'	
		#
	
	6	
	6	
	
	
#/	6	




	
	


	
	
	
	
/	
"

0	/	
		
		
 			
"

	
	/ 	
		

 
/	
	7
 /	##7/	
		)	*	

(
)



		
"

	
			
	/	#
	 	(	
#/	6		#
	
	


		
%%&

	#9	
	
 	
	/
/	
	/		
6	
		/	
		6	
			


	
	
	
	#


																			 	 	:											 	 	:											 	 	 					

;6						 						 										 	 	 																					 	 												 	 												 	 

< /7

	=9	*
	


	 	 ::	 	 <
	)	
0		 																																						

<
	)	
0	0	> 
	,;	
	3?&1

=))	$=@	*0	+

3					)	)	%%	



/0	A
7

	115

(%?'4??'?(&(

(%?'4??'?(&?	'	*B

Feb 7 2018

/s/ Kevin R Huennekens

Entered on Docket: Feb 8 2018

Case 17-30633-KRH Doc 44 Filed 02/08/18 Entered 02/08/18 09:44:18 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2


	


	
6			 	/	B	
6	
		
7

7	/	8	/	
	##	6	
	

	< 6	%0	1%( ;6		::	<
	)	
0		 							 

<
	)	
0	



5%%	
 
	C	+#	

C#	=##0	A=	1%4%



*'+

+		;
B	(5	



/0	A=	11(	

,(%?	1&'4(%%

C$D	
0	$+

	*,%

555%	

/	=0	)	?%%


 
0	B	&&%?1

Case 17-30633-KRH Doc 44 Filed 02/08/18 Entered 02/08/18 09:44:18 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
#### § 200.3 Application of this part.

The provisions of this part are applicable to all elements of FHWA and provide requirements and guidelines for State highway agencies to implement the Title VI Program requirements. The related civil rights laws and regulations are listed under § 200.5(p) of this part. Title VI requirements for 23 U.S.C. 402 will be covered under a joint FHWA/NHTSA agreement.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-1338

EDWARD O. SALYER,

Petitioner,

versus

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(94-162-BLA)

Submitted: May 31, 1996 Decided: June 25, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward O. Salyer, Petitioner Pro Se. Patricia May Nece, Christian

P. Barber, Gary K. Stearman, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision

and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black

lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.

1995). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision

is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Salyer v.

Director, Office of Workers' Compensation, No. 94-162-BLA (B.R.B.

Jan. 11, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §5202. Civil penalties

#### (a) In general

A person who violates section 5201 of this title shall be assessed a civil penalty in an amount computed under subsection (b).

#### (b) Computation of penalty

The penalty shall be—

(1) not more than $10,000, if the violation involved the use of force or violence, or the threatened use of force or violence, against the person or property of another person; and

(2) not more than $5,000 for any other violation.

#### (c) Relationship to other penalties

The penalties established by this section shall be in addition to other criminal or civil penalties that may be levied against the person as a result of an activity in violation of section 5201 of this title.

#### (d) Procedure

Upon receipt of—

(1) a written complaint from an officer, employee, or agent of the Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, or other Federal agency that a person violated section 5201 of this title; or

(2) a sworn affidavit from an individual and a determination by the Secretary that the statement contains sufficient factual allegations to create a reasonable belief that a violation of section 5201 of this title has occurred;

the Secretary may request the Attorney General of the United States to institute a civil action for the imposition and collection of the civil penalty under this section.

#### (e) Use of penalty money collected

After deduction of costs attributable to collection, money collected from penalties shall be—

(1) deposited into the trust fund established pursuant to the Act entitled "An Act to provide that the United States shall aid the States in wildlife-restoration projects, and for other purposes", approved September 2, 1937 (16 U.S.C. 669) (commonly known as the "Pitman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act"), to support the activities authorized by such Act and undertaken by State wildlife management agencies; or

(2) used in such other manner as the Secretary determines will enhance the funding and implementation of—

(A) the North American Waterfowl Management Plan signed by the Secretary of the Interior and the Minister of Environment for Canada in May 1986; or

(B) a similar program that the Secretary determines will enhance wildlife management—

(i) on Federal lands; or

(ii) on private or State-owned lands when the efforts will also provide a benefit to wildlife management objectives on Federal lands.

(Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXII, §320803, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2121.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Pitman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act, referred to in subsec. (e)(1), is act Sept. 2, 1937, ch. 899, 50 Stat. 917, also known as the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act, which is classified generally to chapter 5B (§669 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 669 of this title and Tables.
### §5508. Criminal offenses

#### (a) Offenses

A person is guilty of an offense if the person commits any act prohibited by paragraph (6), (7), (8), or (9) of section 5505 of this title.

#### (b) Punishment

Any offense described in subsection (a) is a class A misdemeanor punishable by a fine under title 18, or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both; except that if in the commission of any offense the person uses a dangerous weapon, engages in conduct that causes bodily injury to any authorized officer, or places any such officer in fear of imminent bodily injury, the offense is a felony punishable by a fine under title 18, or imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both.

(Pub. L. 104–43, title I, §109, Nov. 3, 1995, 109 Stat. 375.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 120 days after Nov. 3, 1995, see section 111 of Pub. L. 104–43, set out as a note under section 5501 of this title.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 99768 / March 19, 2024

Admin. Proc. File No. 3-20639

In the Matter of the Application of

DREAMFUNDED MARKETPLACE, LLC and 

MANUEL FERNANDEZ

For Review of Disciplinary Action Taken by

FINRA

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ISSUE DECISION

The Commission has determined, in its discretion, that it is appropriate to extend by 90

days the period within which the decision in this matter may be issued. Accordingly, IT IS 

ORDERED that such period be, and hereby is, extended to June 17, 2024.

By the Commission.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before KISOR , BAKER , and PENNIX Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Brandon J. BARNES Aviation Ordnanceman (E

- 3), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 20 2300274

_________________________ Decided: 26 April 2024 Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Mishonda M. Mosley
Sentence adjudged 26 September 2023 by a general court

- martial convened at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military judge sitting alone

. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment : reduction to E

- 1, confinement for 364 days , and a bad

- conduct discharge

. 1 For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander Douglas R. Ottenwess , JAGC, USN

1 Appellant was credited with have served 214 days of pretrial confinement.United States v. Barnes , NMCCA No. 20 2300274 Opinion of the Court

2 _________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________
PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, and Appellant having not challenged the factual sufficiency of this case, we have determined that the findings are correct in law, the sentence is correct in law and fact, an d that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 2 T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court

2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
# L_2019132DE.01004702.xml

| 20.5.2019 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 132/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2019

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 132/47

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2016/1384 der Europäischen Zentralbank vom 2. August 2016 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1011/2012 (EZB/2012/24) über die Statistiken über Wertpapierbestände (EZB/2016/22)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 222 vom 17. August 2016
  )

Auf Seite 30, Artikel 1 Nummer 6, eingefügter Artikel 4b Absatz 3 Satz 2:

Anstatt:

„Die tatsächlichen Berichtspflichtigen melden die verlangten Daten innerhalb von 15 Werktagen ab der Aufforderung durch die betreffende NZB.“

muss es heißen:

„Die tatsächlichen Berichtspflichtigen melden die verlangten Daten innerhalb von 15 Arbeitstagen ab der Aufforderung durch die betreffende NZB.“

---
!

 "#$	

												 	 												 	 												 	 	 	 
%#$ 												 	 												

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO INCUR DEBT

THIS MATTER came to be heard on the Motion to Incur Debt filed by the Debtor; and it

APPEARING TO THE COURT that the Debtor filed this case under Chapter 13 of the

U.S. Bankruptcy Code on May 16, 2016; and it

&'(!	))
*	##	#	
%#$		""+	,$		-#	-$#../	00

	"$1""$		&!	,21$#		$#..	#	#	
%#$		#	3#	,	45/6577

"+3	#$#	##	#	5578		)	##	#	68	#	%	 $"	9#	7	:3+

#+;	 ";# 	 , 	 $3 	 4/5< < 	 ,$ 	 # 	 "$"+/ 	 #$#/ 	 #2/ 	  	 3$ 	 #

"3$	#	 "$"$#;	+# 	 # 	 5<	 =$.+	 
$/	 !$/ 	 =$.	 / 	 9		 +

$%	

	++	##	$#	+#/	"	$	"$+	,	+	%.		!$	3#;/	=$./	9#

"$#	#$		""3$#	#$#	%+../	%.	.#	

0#	 6/	>+?	
/	#	/	-,+	@	3%/	=$	-.#$+


#$#/	)$+	

	616 1<7A	

BC)$"$#;DA		#

&'(!	))
*	##	#	
%#$		#	"3$	#	)$"$#;	%3		

#	#$	#	,3$	+$/	++	9	+	9#	$/		$	,+;		3#.$9	#$	$#+A		#

3$	 ,	 ,3	 ,$	#	""$2#	 4/ 76	 9	 ";#	9++	 %	 ,$	 $	$	

	3	#	#9	E%	"$#/	+	3""$#/		#2	$,3A	#	"3$	,	#	)$"$#;	

Case 16-32472-KRH Doc 36 Filed 04/18/19 Entered 04/18/19 13:29:01 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 4
	#	%#	#$#	,	#	
%#$		9++	,+##	$	%+#;	#	"$,$	3$	$	"#$	

)+	 ,+	$A	#	
%#$F	"#$		)+		%	,$A		#$	 	 %	 

%E#	,+	#		-#A		#

&'(!	))
*	##	
%#$F	-#	#	 
3$	
%#	 3+	%	.$#A	#	

#$,$



	##	
%#$F	-#	#	
3$	
%#	%/		#			$%;	*(
/

and the Debtor shall be permitted to borrow 	3#	#	#	2	45/6577	"+3	#$#

## 	 # 	 5578 	  	 )	 ## 	 # 	 68 	 # 	 %	 $"	 9# 	 7 	 :3+	 #+;

";#	,	$3	4/5< <	,$	#	"$"+/	#$#/	#2/		3$	#	"3$	#

)$"$#;

/	=$.


#	GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

'#	##	>?$3"#;	H3.

#$		
?#	GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

)(
	>I

	 	 JJ	H									 	 												 	 												

H			B=>	K776

	L	))/	)

	#	$;	#$#

/	=$.		<

(+"	B67	51<577

&+	B67	51<5<6

+	E?M?""

	




Apr 18 2019 /s/ Kevin R Huennekens

Apr 18 2019

Case 16-32472-KRH Doc 36 Filed 04/18/19 Entered 04/18/19 13:29:01 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 4
	
	*
	(

	 	 JJ	3N		@			 												 	 												

3N		@/	"#$		($3#

)	>2	 67

/	=	6 67



	


	$%;	$#,;	##	#	$$		%	$	%;	++	$;	"$#

	 	 JJ	H									 	 												 	 												

									H		



Case 16-32472-KRH Doc 36 Filed 04/18/19 Entered 04/18/19 13:29:01 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 4
	
	

H		/	:3$

	L	))/	)

	#	$;	#$#

/	=$.		<

3N		@/	"#$		#$3#

)	>2	 67

/	=	6 67

%$#	=	$+/	##	'#	##	($3#

,,	,	#	'#	##	($3#

 7	#	>$	#$#/	3#	7

/	=		<



Case 16-32472-KRH Doc 36 Filed 04/18/19 Entered 04/18/19 13:29:01 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 4