16818 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 58 / Friday, March 25, 2011 / Notices 

RESPONDENTS’ ESTIMATED ANNUAL BURDEN HOURS—Continued 

Citation 30 CFR 1220 Reporting and recordkeeping requirement Hour burden 

Number of 

annual 

responses 

Annual burden 

hours 

§ 1220.033 Audits 

1220.033(b)(1) ................ (b)(1) When nonoperators of an NPSL lease call an audit in accordance with the terms of their operating agreement, the Director shall be notified of the audit call..2 6 12 

1220.033(b)(2) ................ (b)(2) If DOI determines to call for an audit, DOI shall notify the 

lessee of its audit call and set a time and place for the audit 

. . . The lessee shall send copies of the notice to the nonoperators on the lease..

2 6 12 

1220.033(e) .................... (e) Records required to be kept under § 1220.030(a) shall be 

made available for inspection by any authorized agent of DOI..

The Office of Regulatory Affairs determined that 

the audit process is exempt from the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 because MMS staff asks 

non-standard questions to resolve exceptions. 

Total Burden ........... ......................................................................................................... ........................ 110 1,046 

Estimated Annual Reporting and 

Recordkeeping ‘‘Non-hour’’ Cost Burden: 

We have identified no ‘‘non-Hour cost’’ 

burdens. 

Public Disclosure Statement: The PRA 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) provides that an 

agency may not conduct or sponsor, and 

a person is not required to respond to, 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. 

Comments: Before submitting an ICR 

to OMB, PRA Section 3506(c)(2)(A) 

requires each agency to ‘‘* * * provide 

60-day notice in the Federal Register 

* * * and otherwise consult with 

members of the public and affected 

agencies concerning each proposed 

collection of information * * *.’’ 

Agencies must specifically solicit 

comments to: (a) Evaluate whether the 

proposed collection of information is 

necessary for the agency to perform its 

duties, including whether the 

information is useful; (b) evaluate the 

accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the 

burden of the proposed collection of 

information; (c) enhance the quality, 

usefulness, and clarity of the 

information to be collected; and (d) 

minimize the burden on the 

respondents, including the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

The PRA also requires agencies to 

estimate the total annual reporting ‘‘nonhour cost’’ burden to respondents or 

recordkeepers resulting from the 

collection of information. If you have 

costs to generate, maintain, and disclose 

this information, you should comment 

and provide your total capital and 

startup cost components or annual 

operation, maintenance, and purchase 

of service components. You should 

describe the methods you use to 

estimate major cost factors, including 

system and technology acquisition, 

expected useful life of capital 

equipment, discount rate(s), and the 

period over which you incur costs. 

Capital and startup costs include, 

among other items, computers and 

software you purchase to prepare for 

collecting information; monitoring, 

sampling, and testing equipment; and 

record storage facilities. Generally, your 

estimates should not include equipment 

or services purchased: (i) Before October 

1, 1995; (ii) to comply with 

requirements not associated with the 

information collection; (iii) for reasons 

other than to provide information or 

keep records for the Government; or (iv) 

as part of customary and usual business 

or private practices. 

We will summarize written responses 

to this notice and address them in our 

ICR submission for OMB approval, 

including appropriate adjustments to 

the estimated burden. We will provide 

a copy of the ICR to you without charge 

upon request. We also will post the ICR 

at http://www.onrr.gov/Laws_R_D/ 

FRNotices/FRInfColl.htm. 

Public Comment Policy: We will post 

all comments, including names and 

addresses of respondents, at http:// 

regulations.gov. Before including your 

address, phone number, e-mail address, 

or other personal identifying 

information in your comment, be 

advised that your entire comment— 

including your personal identifying 

information—may be made publicly 

available at any time. While you can ask 

us in your comment to withhold from 

public view your personal identifying 

information, we cannot guarantee that 

we will be able to do so. 

ONRR Information Collection 

Clearance Officer: Rachel Drucker (202) 

208–3568. 

Dated: March 22, 2011. 

Gregory J. Gould, 

Director for Office of Natural Resources 

Revenue. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7140 Filed 3–24–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Reclamation 

Central Valley Project Improvement 

Act, Standard Criteria for Ag and 

Urban Water Management Plans 

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of availability. 

SUMMARY: The ‘‘Standard Criteria for 

Agricultural and Urban Water 

Management Plans’’ (Criteria) are now 

available for public comment. To meet 

the requirements of the Central Valley 

Project Improvement Act of 1992 

(CVPIA) and the Reclamation Reform 

Act of 1982 (RRA), the Bureau of 

Reclamation (Reclamation) developed 

and published the Criteria. The Criteria 

apply to any Water Management Plans 

(Plans) submitted to Reclamation as 

required by applicable Central Valley 

Project (CVP) water service contracts, 

settlement contracts, or any contracts 

that specifically invokes the Criteria. 

Note: For the purpose of this 

announcement, Water Management 

Plans are considered the same as Water 

Conservation Plans. 

DATES: Submit written comments by 

April 25, 2011. 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 58 / Friday, March 25, 2011 / Notices 16819 

ADDRESSES: Please mail comments to 

Ms. Melissa Crandell, Bureau of 

Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way, MP– 

410, Sacramento, California 95825, 916– 

978–5208, or e-mail at 

mcrandell@usbr.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To 

be placed on a mailing list for any 

subsequent information or to obtain a 

copy of any water management plans, 

please contact Ms. Crandell at the e-mail 

address or telephone number above. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

3405(e) of the CVPIA (Title 34 Pub. L. 

102–575), requires the Secretary of the 

Interior to establish and administer an 

office on Central Valley Project water 

conservation best management practices 

(BMPs) that shall develop Criteria for 

evaluating the adequacy of all Plans 

developed by project contractors, 

including those Plans required by 

section 210 of the RRA. In addition, 

according to section 3405(e)(1), the 

Criteria must be developed ‘‘* * * with 

the purpose of promoting the highest 

level of water use efficiency reasonably 

achievable by project contractors using 

best available cost-effective technology 

and best management practices.’’ The 

Criteria states that all parties 

(Contractors) that contract with 

Reclamation for water supplies (except 

any contractor who receives less than a 

five-year average of 2,000 acre-feet per 

year (AFY) of only municipal and 

industrial (urban) water, any contractor 

who receives any combination of 

irrigation and/or urban water amounting 

to less than a current five-year average 

of 2,000 AFY, and agricultural contracts 

under a current five-year average of 

2,000 irrigable acres) must prepare Plans 

that contain the following information: 

1. Description of the District 

2. Inventory of Water Resources 

3. BMPs for Agricultural Contractors 

4. BMPs for Urban Contractors 

5. Plan Implementation 

Reclamation will evaluate Plans based 

on the Criteria. The CVPIA requires 

Reclamation to evaluate, and revise if 

necessary, the Criteria every 3 years. 

The Criteria were last updated in 2008 

and the proposed 2011 update is 

currently under review. Public scoping 

meetings to solicit comments on 

revision of the Criteria were held in 

January and February 2011. Comments 

will be incorporated into the finalized 

document. A copy can be found at the 

following Web site: http:// 

www.mp.usbr.gov/watershare/news/ 

2011_Standard_Criteria.pdf. A copy can 

also be obtained by contacting persons 

at the address above. 

Public Disclosure: Before including 

your name, address, phone number, 

e-mail address, or other personal 

identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Dated: March 18, 2011. 

Richard J. Woodley, 

Regional Resources Manager, Mid-Pacific 

Region, Bureau of Reclamation. 

[FR Doc. 2011–7078 Filed 3–24–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—Connected Media 

Experience, Inc. 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

February 8, 2011, pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et sect. (‘‘the Act’’), 

Connected Media Experience, Inc. 

(‘‘CMX’’) has filed written notifications 

simultaneously with the Attorney 

General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing changes in its 

membership. The notifications were 

filed for the purpose of extending the 

Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of 

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages 

under specified circumstances. 

Specifically, Robin Berjon, Paris, 

France, has been added as a party to this 

venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and CMX intends 

to file additional written notifications 

disclosing all changes in membership. 

On March 12, 2010, CMX filed its 

original notification pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the Act. The Department of 

Justice published a notice in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on April 16, 2010 (75 FR 20003). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on November 1, 2010. A 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on December 17, 2010 (75 FR 

79024). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6922 Filed 3–24–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–11–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—Consortium for Energy, 

Environment and Demilitarization 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

February 14, 2011, pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), 

Consortium for Energy, Environment 

and Demilitarization (‘‘CEED’’) has filed 

written notifications simultaneously 

with the Attorney General and the 

Federal Trade Commission disclosing 

(1) the identities of the parties and (2) 

the nature and objectives of the venture. 

The notifications were filed for the 

purpose of extending the Act’s 

provisions limiting the recovery of 

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages 

under specified circumstances. 

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, 

the identities of the Parties are: Auburn 

University, Auburn, AL; Camgian 

Microsystems Corporation, Starkville, 

MS; Capital Technology Group, 

Washington, DC; Cheming North 

America, Chester Township, PA; 

Consortium for Education, Research and 

Technology of North Louisiana (CERT), 

Shreveport, LA; DKJ Technologies, 

Dayton, OH; E2 Project Management 

LLC, Rockaway, NJ; El Dorado 

Engineering Inc., Salt Lake City, UT; 

Engineering and Management 

Executives Inc. (EME), Alexandria, VA; 

Erigo Technologies, LLC, Enfield, NH; 

EXPLO Systems, Inc., Minden, LA; 

General Atomics, San Diego, CA; 

Gradient Technology, Elk River, MN; 

Group 4 Labs, Fremont, CA; HBM 

nCode Federal LLC, Starkville, MS; 

Hoboken Brownstone Company, 

Hoboken, NJ; IPS Custom Automation, 

Grand Prairie, TX; Humanistic Robotics, 

Inc., Bristol, PA; Malocom Pirnie, Inc., 

Baltimore, MD; Mississippi State 

University, Starkville, MS; MSE 

Technology Applications, Butte, MT; 

National Center for Defense 

Manufacturing and Machining, Latrobe, 

PA; Primis Technologies LLC, 

Washington, DC; Real New Energy, 

Alexandria, VA; Stella Group, LTD, 

Washington, DC; Technical Consultants, 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES