alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4766 

To amend title 46, United States Code, to exclude certain aquaculture workers 

from treatment as seamen for the purpose of liability in the event 

of injury or death, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 18, 2019 

Mr. YOUNG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee 

on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title 46, United States Code, to exclude certain 

aquaculture workers from treatment as seamen for the 

purpose of liability in the event of injury or death, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Shellfish Aquaculture 

5 Improvement Act of 2019’’. 

2 

•HR 4766 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON RECOVERY FOR CERTAIN INJURIES 

2 INCURRED IN SHELLFISH AQUACULTURE AC3 TIVITIES IF A STATE REMEDY IS AVAILABLE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 30104 of title 46, United 

5 States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’ before 

7 the first sentence; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(b) LIMITATION ON RECOVERY BY AQUACULTURE

10 WORKERS.—For purposes of subsection (a)— 

11 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘seaman’ does 

12 not include an individual who— 

13 ‘‘(A) is an aquaculture worker if State 

14 workers’ compensation is available to such indi15 vidual; and 

16 ‘‘(B) was, at the time of injury, engaged in 

17 aquaculture in a place where such individual 

18 had lawful access. 

19 ‘‘(2) AQUACULTURE WORKER DEFINED.—For 

20 purposes of paragraph (1), the term ‘aquaculture 

21 worker’ means an individual who— 

22 ‘‘(A) is employed by a commercial enter23 prise that is involved in the controlled cultiva24 tion and harvest of aquatic plants and animals, 

25 including— 

3 

•HR 4766 IH

1 ‘‘(i) the cleaning, processing, or can2 ning of fish and fish products; 

3 ‘‘(ii) the cultivation and harvesting of 

4 shellfish; and 

5 ‘‘(iii) the controlled growing and har6 vesting of other aquatic species; 

7 ‘‘(B) does not hold a license issued under 

8 section 7101(c) of this title; and 

9 ‘‘(C) is not required to hold a merchant 

10 mariner credential under part F of subtitle II 

11 of this title.’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 this section shall apply to injuries incurred on or after the 

14 date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### § 265.1 Reporting change of address.

Except for those exempted by section 263(b) of the Act, all aliens in the United States required to register under section 262 of the Act must report each change of address and new address within 10 days of such change in accordance with instructions provided by USCIS.

[76 FR 53796, Aug. 29, 2011]
EXHIBIT 32.1


The following certification  accompanies North Bay Bancorp's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q and is not filed as provided in SEC Release Nos. 33-8212, 34-47551 and
IC 25967, dated March 21, 2003.


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the  accompanying  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of North Bay
Bancorp for the quarter  ended March 31, 2004, I, Terry L.  Robinson,  President
and Chief Executive Officer of North Bay Bancorp,  hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:


(1) such  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of North Bay  Bancorp  for the  quarter
ended March 31, 2004,  fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of North Bay
Bancorp for the quarter ended March 31, 2004,  fairly presents,  in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of North Bay
Bancorp.


Dated:    May 11, 2005

                                /s/ Terry L. Robinson
                                ---------------------------------------------
                                TERRY L. ROBINSON
                                President and Chief Executive Officer





                                       22
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 95156 / June 24, 2022

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension, pursuant to 

Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, of trading in the securities of Digatrade 

Financial Corporation (“DIGAF”) (CIK No. 1369128), of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 

at 9:30 a.m. EDT on June 27, 2022, and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on July 11, 2022.

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of DIGAF because of 

inaccurate and incomplete information in the market concerning: materially false and misleading 

information in Digatrade SEC filings concerning its President’s ownership and control over 

Digatrade stock, misleading promotional efforts by the President to induce others to purchase 

Digatrade stock at a time when the President was selling Digatrade stock and potential market 

manipulation beginning in May of 2014 and continuing through at least February 2018. The 

materially false and misleading information concerning Digatrade has not been corrected.

The Commission cautions broker-dealers, shareholders, and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by the company. 

Further, brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Rule 15c2-11 under the 

Exchange Act, at the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered unless 

and until they have strictly complied with all of the provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer 

has any questions as to whether or not it has complied with the rule, it should not enter any 

quotation but instead should immediately contact the staff in the Division of Trading and 

Markets, Office of Interpretation and Guidance, at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer is 

uncertain as to what is required by Rule 15c2-11, it should refrain from entering quotations 

relating to DIGAF securities until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is 

certain that all of its provisions have been met. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation 

which is in violation of the rule, the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement 

action.

If any broker-dealer or other person has any information that may relate to this matter, they 

should immediately contact Robert Baker, Assistant Director, at (617) 573-8918.
Request amendment to Exemption 11482 Section 333

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the “Reform Act”) and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, ProFly Aerial (Unmanned Aerial Imaging and Data Collection), the operator of Unmanned Aircraft System (“UAS”), seeks an exemption from the Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) listed

. (1) The requested exemption would permit ProFly Aerial to operate UAS listed in Appendix B (Page 13) BLOS (Bey ond Line of Sight) , which weighs less than 55 lbs for commercial precision aerial surveys and data collections, via remote sensing and measuring by an instrument(s) aboard the UAS. Examples include imagery (photography, video, infrared, etc.), electronic measurement (precision surveying, RF analysis, LIDAR and etc.) 

### (2) The requested exemption would permit ProFly Aerial to operate UAS to conduct commercial agricultural aircraft operations

. ProFly Aerial is requesting exemption from FAR 137. Operations under the exemption will be subject to strict operating requ irements and conditions to ensure at least an equivalent level of safety to currently authorized operations using manned aircraft and under conditions as modified by the FAA as required by Section 333. The attached detailed document ProFly

- Am endm ent BLOS and Agricultural Operations.pdf of our petition is exempt of publishing under the following 

### Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Exemptions. Exemption 4: Business or Trade Information. Exemption 4 protects trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person that is privileged or confidential.
#### Jose Lopez, Respondent, v WS Distribution, Inc., Appellant.

[825 NYS2d 516]

*760In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated May 5, 2006, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff established his prima facie entitlement to summary judgment on the issue of liability through his affidavit wherein he set forth that he was struck by the defendant’s forklift as it was being operated in reverse, thereby shifting the burden to the defendant to produce sufficient evidentiary proof in admissible form to show the existence of a triable issue of fact *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557 [1980]). In response, the defendant failed to present admissible evidence sufficient to raise a triable material issue of fact sufficient to defeat the motion *(see Zuckerman v City of New York, supra).*The unsupported assertion by the defendant’s employee, who was operating the forklift, that the plaintiff walked behind the forklift causing the accident was insufficient to raise an issue of fact regarding the plaintiffs comparative negligence where the defendant’s employee never stated where he was looking prior to the accident or whether he saw the plaintiff prior to the accident and if he did, why he could not avoid striking him.

Moreover, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the motion was not premature, as it failed to offer an evidentiary basis to suggest that discovery may lead to relevant evidence *(see Ruttura & Sons Constr. Co. v Petrocelli Constr.,*257 AD2d 614, 615 [1999] ) and that facts essential to justify opposition to the motion were exclusively within the knowledge and control of the plaintiff *(see Juseinoski v New York Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Queens,*29 AD3d 636 [2006]; *Baron v Incorporated Vil. of Freeport,*143 AD2d 792 [1988]). The mere hope or speculation that evidence sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment may be uncovered during the discovery process is insufficient to deny the motion *(see Arbizu v REM Transp., Inc.,*20 AD3d 375 [2005]; *Kershis v City of New York,*303 AD2d 643 [2003]; *Associates Commercial Corp. v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.,*298 AD2d 537 [2002]; *Drug Guild Distribs. v 3-9 Drugs,*277 AD2d 197 [2000] ; *Weltmann v RWP Group,*232 AD2d 550 [1996]; *Maz*
      *761
      *zaferro v Barterama Corp.,*218 AD2d 643 [1995]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly granted the plaintiff’s motion. Florio, J.E, Krausman, Mastro and Covello, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division 

IN RE:

CASSANDRA L. JOHNSON

Debtor

_______________________________

CITIMORTGAGE, INC.

Movant

v.

CASSANDRA L. JOHNSON

Debtor/Respondent

and

JANET M. MEIBURGER

Trustee/Respondent

Case No. 17-11893-BFK

Chapter 7

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY WITHDRAWAL OF

MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY

COMES NOW, CitiMortgage, Inc. (the “Movant), by and through counsel, and hereby 

withdraws, without prejudice, its Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay filed on September 

14, 2017 with respect to the real property known as 3908 Woodley Dr, Alexandria, VA 22309. 

Dated: October 22, 2018

Respectfully Submitted,

_________________________

Lauren French VSB# 85478

Attorney

BWW Law Group, LLC

8100 Three Chopt Rd.

Suite 240

Richmond, VA 23229

(804) 282-0463 (phone)

(804) 282-0541 (facsimile)

bankruptcy@bww-law.com

Attorney for the Movant

/s/ Lauren French

Case 17-11893-BFK Doc 72 Filed 10/22/18 Entered 10/22/18 16:53:50 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on this 22nd day of October, 2018, the following person(s) were or will be 

served with a copy of the foregoing Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Relief from the 

Automatic Stay electronically via the CM/ECF system or by first class mail, postage prepaid:

Janet M Meiburger, Trustee 

1493 Chain Bridge Road,Suite 201 

Mclean, VA 22101-5726 

Robert R Weed 

1376 Old Bridge Rd, Suite 101-4

Woodbridge, VA 22192 

Cassandra L. Johnson 

3908 Woodley Drive 

Alexandria, VA 22309 

Lauren French VSB# 85478 

Attorney 

BWW Law Group, LLC 

8100 Three Chopt Rd. 

Suite 240 

Richmond, VA 23229 

(804) 282-0463 (phone) 

(804) 282-0541 (facsimile) 

bankruptcy@bww-law.com 

Attorney for the Movant

/s/ Lauren French

Case 17-11893-BFK Doc 72 Filed 10/22/18 Entered 10/22/18 16:53:50 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
§ 58.13 Procedures all agencies shall follow when applying to become approved agencies. ( a ) An agency applying to become an approved agency shall obtain an application, including appendices, from the United States Trustee.
( b ) The agency shall complete the application, including its appendices, and attach the required supporting documents requested in the application.
( c ) The agency shall submit the original of the completed application, including completed appendices and the required supporting documents, to the United States Trustee at the address specified on the application form.
( d ) The application shall be signed by an agency representative who is authorized under applicable law to sign on behalf of the applying agency.
( e ) The signed application, completed appendices, and required supporting documents shall be accompanied by a writing, signed by the signatory of the application and executed on behalf of the signatory and the agency, certifying the application does not: ( 1 ) Falsify, conceal, or cover up by any trick, scheme or device a material fact;
( 2 ) Make any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
( 3 ) Make or use any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry.
( f ) The United States Trustee shall not consider an application, and it may be returned if: ( 1 ) It is incomplete;
( 2 ) It fails to include the completed appendices or all of the required supporting documents; or
( 3 ) It is not accompanied by the certification identified in paragraph (e) of this section.
( g ) The United States Trustee shall not consider an application on behalf of an agency, and it shall be returned if: ( 1 ) It is submitted by any entity other than the agency; or
( 2 ) Either the application or the accompanying certification is executed by any entity other than an agency representative who is authorized under applicable law to sign on behalf of the agency.
( h ) By the act of submitting an application, an agency consents to the release and disclosure of its name, contact information, and non-confidential business information relating to the services it provides on the approved list should its application be approved.
[78 FR 16150, Mar. 14, 2013]
Case 17-34665-KLP Doc 7329 Filed 10/24/19 Entered 10/24/19 12:23:51 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case 17-34665-KLP Doc 7329 Filed 10/24/19 Entered 10/24/19 12:23:51 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), the undersigned, Robert Thistle, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of Micro Laboratories, Inc., (the "Company"),
does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Annual Report Form 10QSB for the six months ended September 30,
2004 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Date:       November 16, 2004

By /s/Robert Thistle
   ----------------------
Robert Thistle
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
513 Aerial, LLC

Request for Amendments to FAA 333 UAS Exemption

Exemption No. 12413

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-2189

Contact:

Zachary P. Elliott

Co-owner

513 Aerial, LLC

zachary.elliott@me.com

www.513aerial.com
Date: September 20, 2015

Re: Exemption No. 12413

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-2189

513 Aerial is requesting amendments to their existing 333 exemption as listed and described 

below. The purpose for the amendments is to be able to offer the services as listed in the existing 

333 exemption. Each amendment will serve to increase the functionality and usefulness of UASs 

and the increased functionality will serve to create safer working environments in the industries 

in which they are deployed.

1. Additional Aircraft

513 Aerial would like to add an additional UAS to the existing exemption. The new craft is a DJI 

Inspire 1 Pro.

Manufacturer: DJI

Model No.: Inspire 1 Pro

The Inspire 1 Pro meets all weight, speed and other criteria spelled out in the 333 exemption. 

The Inspire 1 Pro was designed for the purpose of high-grade aerial photography and 

videography.

2. Closed Set Motion Picture and Television Filming

Relief from restriction #2 for filming in closed set movie or television production 513 Aerial

would like to be able to use UASs for video and film production purposes as called out in the 

333 exemption. It is therefore requesting relief from restriction #2 on the 333 exemption for 

operation in closed set environments for movie and television production.
CONSULTING  AGREEMENT
                                    ---------------------

     CONSULTING  AGREEMENT  dated  as  of  January  10,  2000  between GO ONLINE
NETWORKS  CORPORATION,  a  Delaware  corporation,  ("GONT"),  and  TERRY SEIPELT
("Seibelt").

     WHEREAS:

     A.     Seipelt  has agreed to render consulting services with regard to the
negotiation and completion of a stock exchange between GONT and Westlake Capital
Corp,  a  Colorado  corporation  ("Westlake").

     B.     In  the  event  GONT  is  able  to  complete the Stock Exchange with
Westlake,  GONT  wishes  to  compensate  Seipelt  for  his  consulting services.

     NOW  THEREFORE,  it  is  agreed:

     1.     Compensation.  GONT  shall  pay  and cause to be issued to Seipelt a
            ------------
consulting  fee  of  800,000  shares  of  common  stock  of  GONT (the "Shares")
immediately  upon  the  execution  of  a stock exchange agreement with Westlake.
Such shares shall be subject to registration by GONT on Form S-8, at GONT's sole
expense,  within  30  days  of  GONT  becoming  eligible  for such registration.

     2.     Miscellaneous.  This  Agreement (i) shall be governed by the laws of
            -------------
the  State  of  California;  (ii)  may be executed in counterparts each of which
shall  constitute  an  original;  (iii)  shall  be  binding upon the successors,
representatives, agents, officers and directors of the parties; and (iv) may not
be  modified  or  changed  except  in  a  writing  signed  by  all  parties.

     This  Consulting  Agreement  has  been  executed as of the date first above
written.


                                  GO  ONLINE  NETWORKS  CORPORATION


                                  By:  /s/ Joseph M. Naughton
                              Joseph  M.  Naughton,  Chief  Executive Officer

                              TERRY  SEIPELT
THE LAW OFFICE OF JAMES F. PONS

10900 NORTHWEST FRWY. HOUSTON, TX. 77092 P (832) 372-8138 F (713) 869-8330

April 23, 2015

Mr. Abel Acosta, Clerk

Court of Criminal Appeals

P.O. Box 12308 – Capitol Station

Austin, TX 78711

RE: KEVIN LAVELLE KENT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Case No.: PD-1340-14

Trial Court No.: 1253665

Dear Mr. Acosta:

I plan to present oral argument in the above case in Austin on Wednesday, May

20, 2015 at 9:00 AM.

A copy of this notice is being sent to the attorney of record.

/s/ James Pons

JAMES F. PONS

SBN: 24041707

10900 Northwest Frwy., Ste. 230

Houston, TX 77092

PH (832)372-8138

F (713)869-8330

PD-1340-14

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 4/23/2015 9:28:59 AM

Accepted 4/23/2015 9:31:55 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Tuesday, March 29, 2011 at 2 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, March 29, 2011 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

An adjudicatory matter; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
      ( print page 16646)    
At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

 Dated: March 22, 2011.

Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-7145 Filed 3-22-11; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P