alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 57 (Thursday, March 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 16604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6934]



[[Page 16604]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

 Forest Service


 Siskiyou Resource Advisory Committee To Meet April 18, 2011

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Siskiyou County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will 
meet April 18, 2011.

DATES: The meeting will be held on April 18, 2011 and will begin at 4 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Klamath National Forest 
Supervisor's Office, Conference Room, 1312 Fairlane Road, Yreka, CA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kerry Greene, Committee Coordinator, 
USDA, Klamath National Forest, Supervisor's Office, 1312 Fairlane Road, 
Yreka, CA 96097. (530) 841-4484; e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85eee2e2f7e0e0ebe0c5e3f6abe3e0e1abf0f6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9bf0fcfce9fefef5fedbfde8b5fdfeffb5eee8">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The agenda includes project updates and 
financial status, and presentation and review of new project proposals 
to be considered by the RAC. The meeting is open to the public. 
Opportunity for public comment will be provided and individuals will 
have the opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

    Dated: March 17, 2011.
Patricia A. Grantham,
Forest Supervisor, Klamath National Forest.
[FR Doc. 2011-6934 Filed 3-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 336 

Instructing the managers on the part of the Senate on the bill S. 1790 

(116th Congress) to insist upon the members of the conference to consider potential commonsense solutions regarding family and medical 

leave, including voluntary compensatory time programs and incentives 

through the tax code. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 

Ms. ERNST submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Instructing the managers on the part of the Senate on the 

bill S. 1790 (116th Congress) to insist upon the members of the conference to consider potential commonsense 

solutions regarding family and medical leave, including 

voluntary compensatory time programs and incentives 

through the tax code. 

1 Resolved, That the managers on the part of the Sen2 ate at the conference on the disagreeing votes of the two 

3 Houses on the House amendment to the bill S. 1790 be 

4 instructed to insist upon the members of the conference 

5 consider potential commonsense solutions regarding family 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

SRES 336 ATS 

1 and medical leave, including voluntary compensatory time 

2 programs and incentives through the tax code. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 10.26





November 9, 2007





Andrew McKinnon, Chief Executive Officer

John L. Waddell, Jr., President

James F. Gordon, Director of Blast Mitigating Receptacles

Michael J. Gordon, Chief Financial Officer

Kevin Sharpe, Vice President



Gentlemen:



This letter shall serve as an amendment to each of your employment agreements to cut back on the number of performance options that you were entitled to receive. In this respect, in the event you are entitled to receive a performance option, you shall be granted one-third of the scheduled amount, thereby eliminating your entitlement to the remaining two-thirds.



Please sign below indicating your acceptance of these terms as an amendment to your employment agreement.



Agreed to and Accepted by:



|                                         |  |                          | 
|---------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | 
|/s/ Andrew McKinnon                      |  | /s/ John L. Waddell, Jr. | 
|Andrew McKinnon                          |  | John L. Waddell, Jr.     | 
|Chief Executive Officer                  |  | President                | 
|                                         |  |                          | 
|                                         |  |                          | 
|/s/ James F. Gordon                      |  | /s/ Michael J. Gordon    | 
|James F. Gordon                          |  | Michael J. Gordon        | 
|Director of Blast Mitigating Receptacles |  | Chief Financial Officer  | 
|                                         |  |                          | 
|                                         |  |                          | 
|/s/ Kevin J. Sharpe                      |  |                          | 
|Kevin J. Sharpe, Vice President          |  |                          |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 77624 / April 14, 2016

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-16757

_____________________________

:

In the Matter of : ORDER APPOINTING FUND

: PLAN ADMINISTRATOR AND

Citigroup Alternative Investment LLC : SETTING ADMINISTRATOR

and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. : BOND AMOUNT

:

Respondents. :

_______________________________________

On August 17, 2015, the Commission issued an order ("Order") finding that Citigroup

Alternative Investment LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. ("Respondents") violated the

federal securities laws.1Pursuant to the Order, Respondents paid disgorgement of

$139,950,239.00 and prejudgment interest of $39,612,089.00. A disgorgement fund has been

created for distribution to harmed investors. The disgorgement fund consists of $179,562,328 

paid by Respondents.

The Division of Enforcement now seeks the appointment of Garden City Group asthe

fund plan administrator and requests that the fund plan administrator's bond be set at

$179,562,328 as required by Rules 1105(a) and 1105(c) of the Commission's Rules on Fair

Fund and Disgorgement Plans ("Rules").

2 Garden City Group is included in the Commission's

approved pool of administrators.

 

1 Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act 

of 1933, Section 15(b)(4) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Sections 203(e) and (k) of the Investment 

Advisers Act of 1940, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order, 

Securities Act Release No. 9893 (August 17, 2015).

2

17 C.F.R. §§ 201.1105 (a) and 201.1105(c).
Accordingly, pursuant to Rules 1105(a) and 1105(c), it is hereby ORDERED that

Garden City Group is appointed asthe fund plan administrator and shall obtain a bond in

accordance with Rule 1105(c) in the amount of $179,562,328.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.3

Brent J. Fields

Secretary

 

3

17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(17).
---

CERTIFICATION OF
  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dennis Petke, Chief Financial Officer of Aucxis Corp. (the
  "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004 and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
        and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                               

| | By:    | /s/ Dennis Petke       
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | Name:  | DENNIS PETKE           
| | Title: | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
| | Date:  | November 22, 2004      

---
----

Action brought on 1 June 2004 by Andreas Mausolf against Europol

(Case T-210/04)

(2004/C 201/48)

Language of the case: Dutch

An action against Europol was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 1 June 2004 by Andreas Mausolf, represented by M.F. Baltussen and P. de Casparis.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments:

In support of his application, the applicant alleges infringement of Article 29 of the Europol Staff Regulations, submits that Europol exceeded the limits of its discretion and alleges infringement of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.

----
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 96663 / January 13, 2023

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20526

In the Matter of

Frontier Wealth Management, LLC 

and Shawn Sokolosky,

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

EXTENSION ORDER

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested an extension of time until 

August 8, 2023 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution under Rule 1101(a) of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(a).

On September 3, 2021, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Administrative and 

Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Pursuant to 8A of the Securities Act of 1933, Sections 203(e), 

203(f) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and Section 9(b) of the Investment 

Company Act of 1940, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-andDesist Order (the “Order”)1

against Frontier Wealth Management, LLC and Shawn Sokolosky 

(collectively, the “Respondents”). In the Order, the Commission found that from January 2016 

to February 2018, Frontier failed to adopt and implement written policies and procedures 

reasonably designed to prevent its investment advisory representatives ("IARs") from 

recommending certain types of complex products to clients for whom they were not suitable. In 

total, the Commission ordered the Respondents to pay $261,617 in disgorgement, $47,095 in 

 

1

 Securities Act Rel. No. 10978 (Sept. 3, 2021).
2

prejudgment interest, and $450,000 in civil money penalties, for a collective total of $758,712, to 

the Commission. The Commission also created a Fair Fund, pursuant to Section 308(a) of the 

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, so the penalties paid, along with the disgorgement and interest 

paid, can be distributed to harmed investors (the “Fair Fund”).

The Fair Fund consists of the $758,712 paid by the Respondents. The Fair Fund has been 

deposited in an interest-bearing account at the U.S. Department of the Treasury, and any accrued 

interest will be added to the Fair Fund.

In its request for an extension of time, the Division states that additional time is needed to 

complete the fund administrator solicitation and appointment process, develop the distribution 

methodology, and prepare the proposed plan of distribution.

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s 

request for an extension of time until August 8, 2023 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution is 

granted. 

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.2

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

2

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(i).
### §7141. Definitions

In this subchapter:

#### (1) County funds

The term "county funds" means all funds an eligible county elects under section 7112(d) of this title to reserve for expenditure in accordance with this subchapter.

#### (2) Participating county

The term "participating county" means an eligible county that elects under section 7112(d) of this title to expend a portion of the Federal funds received under section 7112 of this title in accordance with this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 106–393, title III, §301, as added Pub. L. 110–343, div. C, title VI, §601(a), Oct. 3, 2008, 122 Stat. 3909.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 301 of Pub. L. 106–393 was set out in a note under section 500 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 110–343, div. C, title VI, §601(a), Oct. 3, 2008, 122 Stat. 3893.
## Draft Proposal CB-11

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

(IECC). Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/ commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/



## Define Wall Types (CB-11)

Objective: Replace the current text indicating how to determine a wall classification with a formal

definition of each wall type.

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Delete sections C402.2.2, C402.2.2.1, and C402.2.2.2 and add the following definitions to Section

C202:

WALL, ABOVE-GRADE. A wall associated with the building thermal envelope that is more than 15%

above grade and is on the exterior of the building or any wall that is associated with the building thermal

envelope that is not on the exterior of the building.

WALL, BELOW-GRADE. A wall associated with the building thermal envelope that is at least 85%

below grade and is on the exterior of the building.

Reason: Clarification of the code. Section C402.2.2 is not needed as it in essence contains definitions

that are better placed in Section C202. Application of the current Sections C402.2.3 and C402.2.4 are

clear as to requirements and can be readily and more easily applied with the proposed definitions. The

current code provisions are technically incorrect. They refer to the building envelope and the exterior of

the building. This omits any wall that is an interior wall that is part of the building thermal envelope,

which is where the heat transfer occurs that the code is intending to address. The proposed definitions

cover all possible walls that could be part of the building thermal envelope (those bounded completely

or partially by earth, those exposed to the outdoor elements and not bounded by earth, and those

separating conditioned from unconditioned or exempt spaces regardless of location in relation to grade)

in a clearer manner.

Cost Impact: There is no cost impact associated with this proposed change.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 82745 / February 21, 2018

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-17315

In the Matter of

Ross, Sinclaire & Associates, LLC and 

Murray Sinclaire, Jr.

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

SECOND EXTENSION ORDER

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested a second extension of time 

until April 30, 2018 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution under Rule 1101(a) of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(a).

On June 23, 2016, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Administrative and 

Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Sections 15(b) and 21C of the Securities Exchange 

Act of 1934, Sections 203(e) and 203(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and Section 

9(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial 

Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”)1against Ross, Sinclaire & Associates, LLC 

(“RSA”) and Murray Sinclaire, Jr. (“Sinclaire”) (collectively, the “Respondents”). The Order 

found that RSA willfully violated and Sinclaire willfully aided and abetted and caused RSA’s 

violations of Section 15(b)(7) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 15b7-1 

thereunder. The Order required RSA to pay disgorgement of $703,335.16, prejudgment 

interest of $99,239.54, and a civil penalty of $100,000.00 and Sinclaire to pay a civil penalty 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 78147 (June 23, 2016).
2

of $50,000.00 for a total of $952,574.70. The Order also created a Fair Fund, pursuant to 

Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended. 

On May 23, 2017, the Commission issued an order extending the Division’s time until 

February 22, 2018 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution.

2

In its request for a second

extension of time, the Division states that the Commission has appointed the fund 

administrator and the distribution methodology has been developed, but the Division needs 

additional time to complete the Proposed Plan of Distribution.

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s 

request for an extension of time until April 30, 2018 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution 

is granted.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority. 

Brent J. Fields

Secretary

 

2

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 80739 (May 23, 2017).
#### Yellow Taxicab Company, Appellant, *v.*William J. Gaynor, as Mayor of the City of New York, and Others, Respondents.

Appeal from order, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York, granting defendants permission to examine certain books, papers, documents and property belonging to and in the possession of the plaintiff.

Per Curiam:

The facts which the defendants seek to ascertain by this discovery and examination relate solely to matters upon which the plaintiff has the burden of proof before it can get any relief in this action. *(Lawson*v. Hotchkiss, 140 App. Div. 297.) The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
#### § 204.10 [Reserved]
#### § 240.69 Reliance on information compiled by other sources.

In determining whether an applicant is eligible for suspension of deportation or special rule cancellation of removal, the asylum officer may rely on material described in § 208.12 of this chapter. Nothing in this subpart shall be construed to entitle the applicant to conduct discovery directed toward records, officers, agents, or employees of the Service, the Department of Justice, or the Department of State.
### §657. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 632

Section, R.S. §1974; act June 10, 1921, ch. 18, §304, 42 Stat. 204, related to traveling expenses for persons charged with management of seal fisheries in Alaska.
### §5605. Rulemaking

The Secretary shall promulgate regulations as may be necessary to carry out the purposes and objectives of the Convention and this chapter. Any such regulation may be made applicable, as necessary, to all persons and all vessels subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, wherever located.

(Pub. L. 104–43, title II, §206, Nov. 3, 1995, 109 Stat. 379.)
#### Elizabeth Divack, Appellant, v. Sadie Flexser, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
Exhibit 23.1
                                                                    ------------
            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
            --------------------------------------------------------

Herley, Industries, Inc.
Lancaster, PA

We hereby consent to the  incorporation by reference in Registration  Statements
No.  333-71476 and  333-95327 of our reports dated October 7, 2005,  relating to
the consolidated  financial  statements,  the effectiveness of Herley Industries
Inc.'s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  and  schedule  of  Herley
Industries,  Inc.  appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended July 31, 2005.


/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
Philadelphia, PA

October 7, 2005
### §470h–5. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 89–665, title I, §113, as added Pub. L. 102–575, title XL, §4015, Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4762, related to interstate and international traffic in antiquities.
HUVRdata, LLC. 

4819 RO Drive, 

Spicewood TX 78669 

February 2, 2016 

U.S. Department ofTransportation, Docket Operations 

Attn: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Administrator 

West Building Ground Floor, Room Wl2-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Administrator, 

1-iLJ'/R 

Exemption No. 11268 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0942 

This letter is to request that the FAA approve, accept, and amend the previously approved exemption 

referenced above. 

HUVRdata, LLC (HUVR). continues to grow and the future of HUVR operations is being redefined as 

technology changes and the market becomes more defined. As this industry continues to stabilize HUVR 

is seeking to add clarification to its current granted exemption. 

This clarification is regarding the specific make, model, and series to be employed under this exemption. 

Furthermore, as HUVR continues to maintain transparency, would request, in addition to the below listed 

unmanned aircraft (UA), approval to operate UAs approved in other exemptions issued under Section 333 

of Public Law 112-95. This approval would be provisional to the pending approval for the same UAs for 

HUVR operations and limited as provided under that UAs exemption. 

Please fmd below the list of unmanned aircraft (UA) requested. 

DJIPhantom 

DJI Spreading Wings S 1 000+ 

DJI Spreading Wings S 1000 

DJI Flame Wheel F550 

DJI S800 

DJI S900 

DJI Inspire 

DJIS800EVO 

DJI Inspire 1 

DJI T600 

DJI Phantom 1 

DJI Phantom 2 

DJI Phantom 2+ 

DJI Phantom 2 Vision 

DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ 

DJI Phantom 3 Pro 

DJ I Phantom FC40 

3DRobotics DIY Quad kit 

3DRobotics Fixed Wings 
DJI Inspire Pro 

DJIMP330z 

DJIMatrix 

DJI Matrice 1 00 

3DRobotics X8 

3DRobotics Aero-M 

3DRobotics Iris 

3DRobotics IRIS+ 

3DRobotics X8+ 

3D Robotics X8-M 

3D Robotics Y6 

Altura Zenith 

Microdrones Md4-1 000 

C-Astral Bramor Geo 

30Robotics Multirotor 

3DRobotics Quadrotor 

3DRobotics solo 

Aeryon Skyranger 

Freefly Alta 

Vapor 35 

Vapor 55 

Mavinci Sirius 

1-ILJ'/R 

RoboFiight RF70 Fixed wing 

The Lancaster Precision Hawk 

Aeryon Scout 

Microdrones Md4-3000 

C-Astral Bramor rtk 

C-Astral Bramor C4EYE 

Should the Administrator require any additional information or clarification please do not hesitate to 

contact myself or Mr. Ben Williams 

Respectfully, 

Sean Woessner 

4819 RO Drive Spicewood 

Texas 78669 

C: 386-295-8682 

Sean.woessner@huvrdata.com 

Ben Williams 

4819 RO Drive Spicewood 

Texas 78669 

C: 512-550-8373 

Ben.williams@huvrdata.com