alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 972.204 Management systems requirements. ( a ) The FWS shall develop, establish and implement the management systems as described in this subpart. The FWS may tailor the management systems to meet the FWS goals, policies, and needs using professional engineering and planning judgment to determine the required nature and extent of systems coverage consistent with the intent and requirements of this rule.
( b ) The FWS and the FHWA shall develop an implementation plan for each of the management systems. These plans will include, but are not limited to, the following: Overall goals and policies concerning the management systems, each agency's responsibilities for developing and implementing the management systems, implementation schedule, data sources, and cost estimate. The FHWA will provide the FWS ongoing technical engineering support for the development, implementation, and maintenance of the management systems.
( c ) The FWS shall develop and implement procedures for the development, establishment, implementation and operation of management systems. The procedures shall include: ( 1 ) A process for ensuring the results of any of the management systems are considered in the development of FWS transportation plans and transportation improvement programs and in making project selection decisions under 23 U.S.C. 204;
( 2 ) A process for the analyses and coordination of all management system outputs to systematically operate, maintain, and upgrade existing transportation assets cost-effectively;
( 3 ) A description of each management system;
( 4 ) A process to operate and maintain the management systems and their associated databases; and
( 5 ) A process for data collection, processing, analysis and updating for each management system.
( d ) All management systems will use databases with a geographical reference system that can be used to geolocate all database information.
( e ) Existing data sources may be used by the FWS to the maximum extent possible to meet the management system requirements.
( f ) The FWS shall develop an appropriate means to evaluate the effectiveness of the management systems in enhancing transportation decision-making and improving the overall efficiency of the affected federally owned transportation systems and facilities. This evaluation is to be conducted periodically, preferably as part of the comprehensive resource conservation planning process.
( g ) The management systems shall be operated so investment decisions based on management system outputs can be accomplished at the regional level.
§ 657.9 Formulation of a plan for enforcement. ( a ) Each State shall develop a plan for the maintenance of an effective enforcement process. The plan shall describe the procedures, resources, and facilities which the State intends to devote to the enforcement of its vehicle size and weight laws. Each State plan must be accepted by the FHWA and will then serve as a basis by which the annual certification of enforcement will be judged for adequacy.
( b ) The plan shall discuss the following subjects: ( 1 ) *Facilities and resources.* ( i ) No program shall be approved which does not utilize a combination of at least two of the following listed devices to deter evasion of size and weight measurement in sufficient quantity to cover the FA system: fixed platform scales; portable wheel weigher scales; semiportable or ramp scales; WIM equipment.
( ii ) Staff assigned to the program, identified by specific agency. Where more than one State agency has weight enforcement responsibility, the lead agency should be indicated.
( 2 ) *Practices and procedures.* ( i ) Proposed plan of operation, including geographical coverage and hours of operation in general terms.
( ii ) Policy and practices with respect to overweight violators, including off-loading requirements for divisible loads. In those States in which off-loading is mandatory by law, an administrative variance from the legal requirement shall be fully explained. In those States in which off-loading is permissive administrative guidelines shall be included.
( iii ) Policy and practices with respect to penalties, including those for repeated violations. Administrative directives, booklets or other written criteria shall be made part of the plan submission.
( iv ) Policy and practices with respect to special permits for overweight. Administrative directives, booklets or other written criteria shall be made part of the plan submission.
( 3 ) *Updating.* Modification and/or additions to the plan based on experience and new developments in the enforcement program. It is recognized that the plan is not static and that changes may be required to meet changing needs.
Editorial Note on Part 1245
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1245 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and 68 FR 10357, Mar. 5, 2003.

§ 1245.12 What are the procedures for certain Polish and Hungarian parolees who are adjusting status to that of permanent resident under the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996? ( a ) *How do I apply for adjustment of status under this section?* ( 1 ) Each person applying for adjustment of status, under section 646(b) of Public Law 104-208, must file a completed Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, with the correct filing fee, with the Service director having jurisdiction over the applicant's place of residence.
( 2 ) The application must include Form G-325A, Biographic Information and the results of the medical examination made according to § 232.1 of 8 CFR chapter I and § 1245.5.
( 3 ) The application must include evidence to show the applicant was a national of Poland or Hungary who, after being denied refugee status, was inspected and granted parole into the United States between November 1, 1989, and December 31, 1991.
( 4 ) The applicant must have been physically present in the United States for at least 1 year before filing a Form I-485.
( 5 ) After receiving the Form I-485, the adjudicating Service office will notify each applicant who is 14 years old or older of the time and location for the required fingerprinting.
( b ) *How is my application for adjustment of status affected if I leave the United States while my application is still pending?* The departure from the United States by an applicant for adjustment of status must be considered an abandonment of the application, as provided in § 1245.2(a)(4)(ii), unless the applicant was previously granted advance parole for such absence, and was reinspected on returning to the United States.
( c ) *Which grounds for inadmissibility do not apply or can be waived?* The provisions of section 212(a) (4), (5), and (7)(A) of the Act will not apply to adjustment of status under § 1245.12. In addition, the director may waive any other ground of inadmissibility except section 212(a)(2)(C) or 212(a)(3)(A), (B), (C), or (E) of the Act, for humanitarian purposes, to ensure family unity, or when it is otherwise in the public interest.
( d ) *If my application for adjustment of status is approved under § 1245.12 , what date will be recorded as my admission to permanent residence?* On approval of the application for adjustment of status, the date of the applicant's admission to permanent resident status will be the date of the applicant's inspection and parole, as described in paragraph (a) of this section.
[65 FR 20070, Apr. 14, 2000]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with the accompanying Quarterly Report of * (the "Company")
on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  period ended * (the "Report"), I, *, Chief Executive
Officer  of  the  Company,  hereby  certify  that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August  19,  2003


                              /s/  Herman  de  Haas
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              Herman  de  Haas,  Executive  Vice  President  and
                              principal  financial  and  accounting  officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-QSB  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of BlastGard International, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the company’s financial condition and results of operations.








August 16, 2010
By:
/s/ Michael J. GordonMichael J. Gordon, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 1240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1240 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10355, Mar. 3, 2003.

#### § 1240.52 Finality of order.

The decision of the immigration judge shall become final in accordance with § 1003.39 of this chapter.
### §469k. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–333, div. I, title VI, §604(e)(1), Nov. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 4173; Pub. L. 107–359, §3(4)(A), Dec. 17, 2002, 116 Stat. 3016; Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 104–333, div. I, title VI, §604, Nov. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 4173; Pub. L. 107–359, §3, Dec. 17, 2002, 116 Stat. 3016, known as the American Battlefield Protection Act of 1996, established the American Battlefield Protection Program.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 2002 Amendment

Pub. L. 107–359, §1, Dec. 17, 2002, 116 Stat. 3016, provided that: "This Act [amending this section and enacting provisions set out as a note under this section], may be cited as the 'Civil War Battlefield Preservation Act of 2002'."
#### § 208.22 Effect on exclusion, deportation, and removal proceedings.

An alien who has been granted asylum may not be deported or removed unless his or her asylum status is terminated pursuant to § 208.24. An alien in exclusion, deportation, or removal proceedings who is granted withholding of removal or deportation, or deferral of removal, may not be deported or removed to the country to which his or her deportation or removal is ordered withheld or deferred unless the withholding order is terminated pursuant to § 208.24 or deferral is terminated pursuant to § 208.17(d) or (e).

[64 FR 8492, Feb. 19, 1999. Revised at 65 FR 76136, Dec. 6, 2000]
### §460jjj–2. Minerals and mining

#### (a) Limitation on patent issuance

(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no patents shall be issued after May 30, 1991, for any location or claim made in the recreation area under the mining laws of the United States.

(2) Notwithstanding any statute of limitations or similar restriction otherwise applicable, any party claiming to have been deprived of any property right by enactment of paragraph (1) may file in the United States Claims Court 1 a claim against the United States within 1 year after October 12, 1993, seeking compensation for such property right. The United States Claims Court 1 shall have jurisdiction to render judgment upon any such claim in accordance with section 1491 of title 28.

#### (b) Withdrawal

Subject to valid existing rights, after October 12, 1993, lands within the recreation area withdrawn from location under the general mining laws and from the operation of the mineral leasing, geothermal leasing, and mineral material disposal laws.

#### (c) Reclamation

No mining activity involving any surface disturbance of lands or waters within such area, including disturbance through subsidence, shall be permitted except in accordance with requirements imposed by the Secretary, including requirements for reasonable reclamation of disturbed lands to a visual and hydrological condition as close as practical to their premining condition.

#### (d) Mining claim validity review

The Secretary of Agriculture shall undertake and complete within 3 years after October 12, 1993, an expedited program to examine all unpatented mining claims, including those for which a patent application has been filed, within the recreation area. Upon determination by the Secretary of Agriculture that the elements of a contest are present, the Secretary of the Interior shall immediately determine the validity of such claims. If a claim is determined to be invalid, the Secretary shall promptly declare the claim to be null and void.

#### (e) Public purposes

The Secretary may utilize mineral materials from within the recreation area for public purposes such as maintenance and construction of roads, trails, and facilities as long as such use is compatible with the purposes of the recreation area.

(Pub. L. 103–104, §3, Oct. 12, 1993, 107 Stat. 1028.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

References to United States Claims Court deemed to refer to United States Court of Federal Claims, see section 902(b) of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

1 See Change of Name note below.
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Harvey Electronics, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended  November 1, 2003, as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  Franklin C. Karp,
President, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of and for the year ended November 1, 2003.





/s/ Franklin C. Karp
--------------------
Franklin C. Karp
President
January 30, 2004
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  SBA Leadership 
-  Hannibal "Mike" Ware 

#   Hannibal "Mike" Ware

Inspector General

Office of Inspector General

            Download high-resolution image          

Hannibal “Mike” Ware was sworn in as Inspector General on May 24, 2018, following his confirmation by the U.S. Senate. He is responsible for independent oversight of SBA’s programs and operations, which normally encompass more than $100 billion in guaranteed loans and nearly $100 billion in Federal contracting dollars. As a result of SBA’s role in the nation’s pandemic response, he is providing oversight of over a trillion dollars of lending authority aimed at stabilizing the nation’s economy and providing vital capital to the nation’s small businesses. He also is a statutory member of the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency’s (CIGIE) Pandemic Response Accountability Committee (PRAC), serving alongside his Inspector General colleagues to provide a whole of Government response to the pandemic oversight effort. Within CIGIE, Inspector General Ware chairs the Audit Committee and is a member of CIGIE’s Executive Council. In addition, Inspector General Ware serves as the Chair of the Subcommittee on Audits for the PRAC. 

Prior to his appointment to be the Inspector General, from April 2016 to January 2017, Mr. Ware served as the Deputy Inspector General, and he served as the Acting Inspector General from January 2017. Mr. Ware has over 30 years of experience within the OIG community. In 1990, he joined DOI OIG’s Virgin Islands field office as an auditor and later became the Field Office Supervisor. Throughout his long and distinguished oversight career, he performed increasingly challenging and vital roles within the OIG community. From the Virgin Islands field office, Mr. Ware was promoted to Eastern Regional Manager, where he provided leadership of all phases of the technical and administrative operation of the region, including planning and managing audits, inspections, evaluations, and joint investigations. Mr. Ware later moved to DOI OIG’s Office of Management and served as the Deputy Assistant Inspector General for Management.  In this capacity, he executed DOI OIG’s independent operating budget and managed the logistical concerns for the office’s nationwide presence. In April 2016, he was appointed to the Senior Executive Service as the SBA OIG Deputy Inspector General.

Mr. Ware holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in accounting from the University of the Virgin Islands and was conferred a degree of Doctorate of Humane Letters by the University in December 2020. He also is a graduate of the Senior Executive Service Career Development Program. He has received numerous awards and honors throughout his career as recognition for his significant work in the Inspector General community. Inspector General Ware is a Chairman Emeritus of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners’ Board of Regents and was recently named Certified Fraud Examiner of the Year by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 88588 / April 8, 2020

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-19715

In the Matter of

Fortress Investment Management, 

LLC and William M. Malloy, III

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

EXTENSION ORDER

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested an extension of time until 

November 30, 2020 to submit a Proposed Plan of Distribution under Rule 1101(a) of the 

Commission’s Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(a).

On February 27, 2020, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Administrative 

and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Pursuant to Sections 203(e), 203(f) and 203(k) of the 

Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Section 9(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, 

Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order 

(“Order”)1against Fortress Investment Management, LLC (“Fortress”) and William M. 

Malloy, III (“Malloy”) (collectively, the “Respondents”). These proceedings arose from 

improper Commission registration and failure to disclose a conflict of interest involving 

Malloy and two investment adviser firms under his control, MWM 1835, LLC (“MWM”) and 

Fortress. The Order required Malloy to pay a $50,000 civil money penalty and Fortress to 

pay $45,040 in disgorgement, $9,057 in prejudgment interest, and a $50,000 civil money 

penalty to the Commission. The Commission also created a Fair Fund, pursuant to Section 

 

1

 Adviser Act Rel. No. 5452 (Feb. 27, 2020).
2

308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, so the penalty could be distributed to investors 

harmed by the Respondents’ conduct described in the Order.

In its request for an extension of time, the Division states that it needs time to solicit 

and evaluate fund administrator proposals, develop the distribution methodology, and 

develop the plan of distribution. 

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Division’s 

request for an extension of time until November 30, 2020 to submit a Proposed Plan of 

Distribution is granted.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 87218 / October 3, 2019

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-19227

In the Matter of

Fieldstone Financial Management 

Group, LLC and

Kristofor R. Behn,

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

By order dated February 22, 2019, the Commission issued the “Omnibus Order 

Directing the Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that 

Establish Distribution Funds” (“Omnibus Order”),1authorizing the Secretary to issue 

orders for calendar years 2019-2021 appointing, upon request by the Commission staff, 

Miller Kaplan Arase LLP (“Miller Kaplan”), a certified public accounting firm, with one 

of their offices located in San Fransciso, California, as tax administrator (“Tax 

Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund may incur 

tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department of 

the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On September 30, 2019, the Commission staff requested, pursuant to the 

Omnibus Order, the appointment of Miller Kaplan as the Tax Administrator for the 

QSF in the above-referenced proceeding. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Miller Kaplan, pursuant to and in accordance 

with the Omnibus Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the abovereferenced proceeding. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 85174 (Feb. 22, 2019).
#### Fred C. Lusk and Others, Respondents, v. Myrtie L. Langham, Appellant.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted before another referee, with costs to appellant to abide event, unless the plaintiffs shall within ten days stipulate to reduce the amount of the fund by the amount of the debts owing by Charles Lusk, the husband of the grantor named in the deed in question, but not to exceed the amount paid therefor by John D. Langham," in which event the judgment is modified accordingly and as so modified is affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Held, that the referee improperly struck out the evidence relating to such debts and that the same to the extent above indicated should have been allowed by him against the funds in the hands of the defendant. Settle order before Mr. Justice Robson on two days’ notice. All concurred.