INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

 We make Indiana a cleaner, healthier place to live. 

Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr. 100 North Senate Avenue 

Governor Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 

 (317) 232-8603 

Thomas W. Easterly (800) 451-6027 

Commissioner www.IN.gov/idem 

Page 1 of 2 

FNTV-PMOD.dot 03/23/06 

 Recycled Paper An Equal Opportunity Employer Please Recycle 

 

TO: Interested Parties / Applicant 

DATE: March 20, 2007 

RE: Eli Lilly / 157-22712-00006 

FROM: Nisha Sizemore 

 Chief, Permits Branch 

 Office of Air Quality 

Notice of Decision: Approval – Effective Immediately 

Please be advised that on behalf of the Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Management, 

I have issued a decision regarding the enclosed matter. Pursuant to IC 13-17-3-4 and 326 IAC 2, this 

permit modification is effective immediately, unless a petition for stay of effectiveness is filed and granted, 

and may be revoked or modified in accordance with the provisions of IC 13-15-7-1. 

If you wish to challenge this decision, IC 4-21.5-3-7 and IC 13-15-7-3 require that you file a petition for 

administrative review. This petition may include a request for stay of effectiveness and must be submitted 

to the Office Environmental Adjudication, 100 North Senate Avenue, Government Center North, Room 

1049, Indianapolis, IN 46204, within eighteen (18) days of the mailing of this notice. The filing of a 

petition for administrative review is complete on the earliest of the following dates that apply to the filing: 

(1) the date the document is delivered to the Office of Environmental Adjudication (OEA); 

(2) the date of the postmark on the envelope containing the document, if the document is mailed to 

OEA by U.S. mail; or 

(3) The date on which the document is deposited with a private carrier, as shown by receipt issued 

by the carrier, if the document is sent to the OEA by private carrier. 

The petition must include facts demonstrating that you are either the applicant, a person aggrieved or 

adversely affected by the decision or otherwise entitled to review by law. Please identify the permit, 

decision, or other order for which you seek review by permit number, name of the applicant, location, date 

of this notice and all of the following: 

(1) the name and address of the person making the request; 

(2) the interest of the person making the request; 

(3) identification of any persons represented by the person making the request; 

(4) the reasons, with particularity, for the request; 

(5) the issues, with particularity, proposed for considerations at any hearing; and 

(6) identification of the terms and conditions which, in the judgment of the person making the 

request, would be appropriate in the case in question to satisfy the requirements of the law 

governing documents of the type issued by the Commissioner. 
Pursuant to 326 IAC 2-7-18(d), any person may petition the U.S. EPA to object to the issuance of a Title 

V operating permit or modification within sixty (60) days of the end of the forty-five (45) day EPA review 

period. Such an objection must be based only on issues that were raised with reasonable specificity 

during the public comment period, unless the petitioner demonstrates that it was impractible to raise such 

issues, or if the grounds for such objection arose after the comment period. 

To petition the U.S. EPA to object to the issuance of a Title V operating permit, contact: 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

401 M Street 

Washington, D.C. 20406 

If you have technical questions regarding the enclosed documents, please contact the Office of Air 

Quality, Permits Branch at (317) 233-0178. Callers from within Indiana may call toll-free at 1-800-451-

6027, ext. 3-0178. 

 

Enclosures 

FNTV-PMOD.doc 03/23/06
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

 We make Indiana a cleaner, healthier place to live. 

Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr. 100 North Senate Avenue 

Governor Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2251 

 (317) 232-8603 

Thomas W. Easterly (800) 451-6027 

Commissioner www.IN.gov/idem 

Ms. Beth Brock March 20, 2007 

Environmental Team Leader 

Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories 

1650 Lilly Road 

Lafayette, Indiana 47909-9201 

Re: 157-22717-00006 

Significant Permit Modification to: 

Part 70 permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

Dear Ms. Brock: 

Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories, was issued Part 70 operating permit T157-

6879-00006 on February 27, 2004 for a stationary pharmaceutical manufacturing plant. Three (3) 

separate applications, which were combined into Significant Permit Modification 157-22717-00006 to 

modify the Part 70 permit were received on March 1, 2006, June 2, 2006; and September 18, 2006. 

Pursuant to the provisions of 326 IAC 2-7-12 a significant modification to this permit is hereby approved as 

described in the attached Technical Support Document. 

The permit modification consists of incorporating the applicable requirements for boilers 6 and 7, 

an emergency generator and an emergency air compressor permitted in Significant Source Modification 

No. 157-21809-00006 issued on June 6, 2006; including the incorporation of an Alternative Monitoring 

Plan (AMP), approved by US EPA on January 27, 2006 in lieu of the existing Continuous Emission 

Monitoring Systems (CEMS) for the T149 rotary kiln incinerator. 

 Please find a copy of the revised Part 70 permit. 

This decision is subject to the Indiana Administrative Orders and Procedures Act - IC 4-21.5-3-5. 

If you have any questions on this matter, please contact Aida De Guzman OAQ, 100 North Senate 

Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46204-2251, or call at (800) 451-6027, and ask for Aida De Guzman or 

extension (3-4972), or dial (317) 233-4972. 

Sincerely, 

 Original Signed By: 

Nisha Sizemore, Chief 

Permits Branch 

Office of Air Quality 

Attachments 

APD 

cc: File -Tippecanoe County 

Tippecanoe County Health Department 

Air Compliance Section Inspector – Wanda Stanfield 

Compliance Data Section 

Administrative and Development
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

 We make Indiana a cleaner, healthier place to live. 

Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr. 100 North Senate Avenue 

Governor Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 

(317) 232-8603 

Thomas W. Easterly (800) 451-6027 

Commissioner www.IN.gov/idem 

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

PART 70 OPERATING PERMIT AND 

FLEXIBLE PERMIT AND 

PLANTWIDE APPLICABILITY LIMITATIONS (PAL) Permit 

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY 

Eli Lilly and Company 

Tippecanoe Laboratories Facility 

1650 Lilly Road 

Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

(herein known as the Permittee) is hereby authorized to operate subject to the conditions contained herein, the 

source described in Section A (Source Summary) of this permit. 

The Permittee must comply with all conditions of this permit. Noncompliance with any provisions of this permit 

is grounds for enforcement action; permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or denial of a 

permit renewal application. Noncompliance with any provision of this permit, except any provision specifically 

designated as not federally enforceable, constitutes a violation of the Clean Air Act. It shall not be a defense for 

the Permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity 

in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit. An emergency does constitute an affirmative 

defense in an enforcement action provided the Permittee complies with the applicable requirements set forth in 

Section B, Emergency Provisions.

This permit is issued in accordance with 326 IAC 2 and 40 CFR Part 70 Appendix A and contains the conditions 

and provisions specified in 326 IAC 2-7 as required by 42 U.S.C. 7401, et. seq. (Clean Air Act as amended by 

the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments), 40 CFR Part 70.6, IC 13-15 and IC 13-17. This permit also addresses 

certain new source review requirements for existing equipment and is intended to fulfill the new source review 

procedures pursuant to 326 IAC 2-2 and 326 IAC 2-7-10.5, applicable to those conditions. 

Operation Permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

Issued by: Original signed by 

Janet G. McCabe, Assistant Commissioner 

Office of Air Quality 

Issuance Date: February 27, 2004 

Expiration Date: February 27, 2009 

First Significant Permit Modification No: 157-20216-00006, issued on January 19, 2005 

First Administrative Amendment No: 157-20003-00006, issued on April 1, 2005 

Second Administrative Amendment No: 157-21143-00006, issued on May 11, 2005 

Second Significant Permit Modification No: 157-20732-00006, issued on August 15, 2005 

Third Significant Permit Modification, Flexible Permit, and PAL Permit No. 157-21811-00006, issued on 

May 9, 2006 

Fourth Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 

Issued by: Original Signed By: 

Nisha Sizemore, Chief

Permits Branch

Office of Air Quality

Issuance Date: March 20, 2007 

Expiration Date: February 27, 2009 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 2 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

A SOURCE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 5 

A.1 General Information [326 IAC 2-7-4(c)][326 IAC 2-7-5(15)][326 IAC 2-7-1(22)] 

A.2 Emission Units and Pollution Control Equipment Summary [326 IAC 2-7-4(c)(3)] 

[326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

A.3 Insignificant Activities [326 IAC 2-7-1(21)][326 IAC 2-7-4(c)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

A.4 Part 70 Permit Applicability [326 IAC 2-7-2] 

B GENERAL CONDITIONS.............................................................................................................. 11 

B.1 Definitions [326 IAC 2-7-1] 

B.2 Permit Term [326 IAC 2-7-5(2)] [326 IAC 2-1.1-9.5] [326 IAC 2-7-4(a)(1)(D)] [IC 13-15-3-

6(a)] 

B.3 Enforceability [326 IAC 2-7-7] 

B.4 Termination of Right to Operate [326 IAC 2-7-10] [326 IAC 2-7-4(a)] 

B.5 Severability [326 IAC 2-7-5(5)] 

B.6 Property Rights or Exclusive Privilege [326 IAC 2-7-5(6)(D)] 

B.7 Duty to Provide Information [326 IAC 2-7-5(6)(E)] 

B.8 Certification [326 IAC 2-7-4(f)] [326 IAC 2-7-6(1)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)(C)] 

B.9 Annual Compliance Certification [326 IAC 2-7-6(5)] 

B.10 Preventive Maintenance Plan [326 IAC 2-7-5(1), (3) and (13)] 

[326 IAC 2-7-6(1) and (6)] [326 IAC 1-6-3] 

B.11 Emergency Provisions [326 IAC 2-7-16] 

B.12 Permit Shield [326 IAC 2-7-15] [326 IAC 2-7-20] [326 IAC 2-7-12] 

B.13 Prior Permits Superseded [326 IAC 2-1.1-9.5] 

B.14 Deviations from Permit Requirements and Conditions [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)(C)(ii)] 

B.15 Permit Modification, Reopening, Revocation and Reissuance, or Termination 

[326 IAC 2-7-5(6)(C)] [326 IAC 2-7-8(a)] [326 IAC 2-7-9] 

B.16 Permit Renewal [326 IAC 2-7-3] [326 IAC 2-7-4] [326 IAC 2-7-8(e)] 

B.17 Permit Amendment or Modification [326 IAC 2-7-11][326 IAC 2-7-12] 

B.18 Permit Revision Under Economic Incentives and Other Programs 

[326 IAC 2-7-5(8)] [326 IAC 2-7-12 (b)(2)] 

B.19 Operational Flexibility [326 IAC 2-7-20] [326 IAC 2-7-10.5] 

B.20 Source Modification Requirement [326 IAC 2-7-10.5] 

B.21 Inspection and Entry [326 IAC 2-7-6] [IC 13-14-2-2][IC 13-30-3-1] [IC 13-17-3-2] 

B.22 Transfer of Ownership or Operational Control [326 IAC 2-7-11] 

B.23 Annual Fee Payment [326 IAC 2-7-19] [326 IAC 2-7-5(7)][326 IAC 2-1.1-7] 

B.24 Advanced Source Modification Approval [326 IAC 2-7-5(16)] [326 IAC 2-7-10.5] 

B.25 Credible Evidence [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-6] [62 FR 8314] [326 IAC 1-1-6] 

B.26 Term of Conditions [326 IAC 2-1.1-9.5] 

C SOURCE OPERATION CONDITIONS.......................................................................................... 24 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)]

C.1 Particulate Emission Limitations For Processes with Process Weight Rates Less 

Than One Hundred (100) pounds per hour [326 IAC 6-3-2] 

C.2 Opacity [326 IAC 5-1] 

C.3 Open Burning [326 IAC 4-1] [IC 13-17-9] 

C.4 Fugitive Dust Emissions [326 IAC 6-4] 

C.5 Reserved 

C.6 Stack Height [326 IAC 1-7] 

C.7 Asbestos Abatement Projects [326 IAC 14-10] [326 IAC 18] [40 CFR 61, Subpart M] 

Testing Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-6(1)] 

C.8 Performance Testing [326 IAC 3-6] 

Compliance Requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11] 

C.9 Compliance Requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11] 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 3 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Compliance Monitoring Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] [326 IAC 2-7-6(1)] 

C.10 Compliance Monitoring [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-6(1)] 

C.11 Maintenance of Continuous Emission Monitoring Equipment 

[326 IAC 2-7-5(3)(A)(iii)] [326 IAC 2-1.1-11] [326 IAC 3-5] 

Corrective Actions and Response Steps [326 IAC 2-7-5] [326 IAC 2-7-6] 

C.12 Emergency Reduction Plans [326 IAC 1-5-2] [326 IAC 1-5-3] 

C.13 Risk Management Plan [326 IAC 2-7-5(12)] [40 CFR 68] 

C.14 Compliance Response Plan - Preparation, Implementation, Records, and Reports 

[326 IAC 2-7-5] [326 IAC 2-7-6] 

C.15 Actions Related to Noncompliance Demonstrated by a Stack Test [326 IAC 2-7-5] 

[326 IAC 2-7-6] 

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-19] 

C.16 Emission Statement [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)(C)(iii)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(7)] [326 IAC 2-7-19(c)] 

[326 IAC 2-6] 

C.17 General Record Keeping Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-6] [326 IAC 2-2] 

C.18 General Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)(C)] [326 IAC 2-1.1-11][326 IAC 2-2] 

Stratospheric Ozone Protection 

C.19 Compliance with 40 CFR 82 and 326 IAC 22-1 

D SOURCE OPERATION SECTIONS.............................................................................................. 34 

D.1 Utilities Operations 

D.2 Utilities Support Operations 

D.3 Fermented Products – Fermentation Operations 

D.4 Fermented Products – Purification Operations 

D.5 Fermented Products – Support Operations 

D.6 Bulk Pharmaceutical Manufacturing (BPM) Operations 

D.7 BPM Solvent Recovery Operations 

D.8 BPM Individual Drain System Operations 

D.9 BPM Solvent Storage Tanks 

D.10 BPM Waste Storage Tanks 

D.11 BPM Waste Containers 

D.12 T49 Liquid Waste Incinerator Operations 

D.13 T149 Rotary Kiln Incinerator Operations 

D.14 Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer (RTO) System Operations 

D.15 T79 Fume Incinerator System Operations 

D.16 BPM Research and Development Operations 

D.17 BPM General Wastewater Requirements 

D.18 BPM Chemical Wastewater Treatment Plant Operations 

D.19 BPM Transfer of Affected Wastewater for Offsite Treatment 

D.20 Boilers 1 through 7, Emergency Generator, and Emergency Air Compressor 

E SOURCE OPERATION SECTIONS............................................................................................ 167 

E.1 Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) for BPM Process System Components 

E.2 Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) for BPM Waste System Components 

F SOURCE OPERATION SECTION .............................................................................................. 183 

F.1 Change Management and Flexible Permit Conditions 

G SOURCE OPERATION SECTION .............................................................................................. 199 

G.1 Plantwide Applicability Limitations Requirements 

Quarterly Coal Characteristic and Consumption Report.................................................................... 205 

Quarterly Fuel Oil Characteristic and Consumption Report .............................................................. 206 

Quarterly Generator Hours Report........................................................................................................ 207 

Streamlined CMS Periodic Report..................................................................................................208-211 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 4 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Streamlined LDAR Periodic Report................................................................................................212-213 

Semi-Annual Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 Certification .................................................................214 

Quarterly CO Emissions Report Boilers No. 6 and No. 7..........................................................215 

Quarterly Fuel Oil Usage Report Boilers No. 6..................................................................216-217 

Quarterly Fuel Oil Usage Report Boilers No. 7 ......................................................................218 

Annual Hours of Operation Report Emergency Air Compressor .............................................219 

Emergency Occurrence Report......................................................................................................220-221 

Quarterly Deviation and Compliance Monitoring Report.................................................................... 222 

Part 70 Operating Permit Certification Quarterly Report.................................................................... 223 

Section F.1 and Section G.1 – Quarterly Emission Limit Report ................................................224-226 

The remainder of the page is left blank intentionally. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 5 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION A SOURCE SUMMARY

This permit is based on information requested by the Indiana Department of Environmental Management 

(IDEM), Office of Air Quality (OAQ). The information describing the source contained in conditions A.1 

through A.3 is descriptive information and does not constitute enforceable conditions. However, the 

Permittee should be aware that a physical change or a change in the method of operation that may 

render this descriptive information obsolete or inaccurate may trigger requirements for the Permittee to 

obtain additional permits or seek modification of this permit pursuant to 326 IAC 2, or change other 

applicable requirements presented in the permit application. 

A.1 General Information [326 IAC 2-7-4(c)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] [326 IAC 2-7-1(22)] 

The Permittee owns and operates a stationary pharmaceutical manufacturing plant. 

Responsible Official: Mr. Lawrence J. McShane, General Manager 

Source Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana, 47909 

Mailing Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana, 47909 

Source Phone Number: (765) 477-4226 

SIC Code: 2833, 2879 

County Location: Tippecanoe County 

Source Location Status: Attainment for all criteria pollutants 

Source Status: Part 70 Permit Program; 

Major Source under PSD; 

Major Source, Section 112 of the Clean Air Act; 

1 of 28 Source Categories 

A.2 Emission Units and Pollution Control Equipment Summary [326 IAC 2-7-4(c)(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-

5(15)] 

This stationary source consists of the following emission units and pollution control devices: 

(a) D.1 Utilities Operations: The utilities operations consist of three coal/natural gas-fired 

boilers equipped with an ash handling system and supported by a coal pile and coal 

conveyor system, and two natural gas boilers with fuel oil backup supplied by one fuel oil 

tank. The boilers provide steam to process operations in bulk pharmaceutical 

manufacturing and fermented products. The detailed equipment list is located in Section 

D.1 of this permit. Section D.1 will be superseded by Section D.20 starting September 13, 

2007. This is the effective date of 40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD (Boiler MACT). At this 

time, the coal feed to Boilers No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3 will be shut off, and these boilers will 

burn 100% natural gas. 

(b) D.2 Utilities Support Operations: The utility support facilities include the lime system for 

the potable water system (T9/T23), glycol tanks for heating and cooling of BPM tanks and 

chillers, generators and compressors. The detailed equipment list is located in Section 

D.2 of this permit. 

(c) D.3 Fermented Products - Fermentation Operations: The fermentation processes include 

the dry material storage area (T46), the raw material prep area (T1), the fermentation 

production areas (T2, T2A, T2B, T2C) and product storage area (T63). The detailed 

equipment list is located in Section D.3 of this permit. 

(d) D.4 Fermented Products - Purification Operations: The whole broth products from 

fermentation are stored in Building T63 and then continuously fed to the purification 

equipment as capacity allows. The purification department consists of extraction and 

elution processes (T3, T40, and T94), solvent recovery (T4), raw and recovered material 

storage (T147), and product storage (T39). The detailed equipment list is located in 

Section D.4 of this permit. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 6 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(e) D.5 Fermented Products - Support Operations: The support operations for the 

Fermented Products (FP) area consist of the FP wastewater treatment plant and FP 

wastewater sludge storage operations. The detailed equipment list is located in Section 

D.5 of this permit. 

(f) D.6 Bulk Pharmaceutical Manufacturing (BPM) - Process Operations: The emission units 

in the BPM production operations can be generally described as process vessels (tanks), 

crystallizers, filters, centrifuges, dryers, process scrubber systems, and process 

condenser systems and are referred to as process vents. The detailed equipment list is 

located in Section D.6 of this permit. 

(g) D.7 BPM Support - Solvent Recovery Operations: The BPM solvent recovery emission 

units can be generally described as columns, stills, evaporators, accumulators and 

receivers and are referred to as process vents. The detailed equipment list is located in 

Section D.7 of this permit. 

(h) D.8 BPM Individual Drain Systems (IDSs): The BPM IDSs consist of stationary systems 

used to convey waste streams to a waste management unit. Segregated stormwater 

sewer systems, designed and operated for the sole purpose of collecting rainfall-runoff at 

a facility, and segregated from all other IDSs, are excluded from this definition. The 

detailed equipment list is located in Section D.8 of this permit. 

(i) D.9 BPM Support – Solvent Storage Tank Operations: The BPM solvent storage tanks 

are defined as any vessel designed to store raw material feedstocks or used solvent to 

be recovered that contain VOCs and/or VOHAP. Pressure vessels greater than 204.9 

kPa without emissions to the atmosphere, vessels attached to motor vehicles, or vessels 

used to store beverage alcohol are not BPM solvent storage tanks. The detailed 

equipment list is located in Section D.9 of this permit. 

(j) D.10 BPM Support – Waste Storage Tank Operations: The BPM waste storage tanks 

are defined as any waste management unit designed to contain an accumulation of 

waste material containing VOCs and/or VOHAP. Pressure vessels greater than 204.9 

kPa without emissions to the atmosphere or vessels attached to motor vehicles are not 

BPM waste storage tanks. The detailed equipment list is located in Section D.10 of this 

permit. 

(k) D.11 BPM Waste Containers: Waste containers are segregated into small and large 

containers. A small BPM waste container, such as a drum, contains VOC/VOHAP with a 

capacity greater than 26.4 gallons and equal to or less than 110.5 gallons. A large BPM 

waste container, such as a melon or a tanker truck, contains VOC/VOHAP with a 

capacity greater than 110.5 gallons. Identification of these types of containers have not 

been individually listed given they are portable and continually change. 

(l) D.12 BPM Control Systems – T49 Liquid Waste Incinerator: The T49 liquid waste 

incinerator provides treatment of Lilly hazardous and non-hazardous waste to support its 

operational requirements, including high Btu liquids (primary waste) and low Btu liquids 

(secondary waste). The T49 incinerator consists of a primary combustion chamber 

followed by a wet quench system, a condenser/absorber, a particulate matter scrubber, 

and a stack with continuous emissions monitoring. The detailed equipment list is located 

in Section D.12 of this permit. 

(m) D.13 BPM Control Systems – T149 Solids-Liquid Waste Incinerator: The T149 solidsliquid waste incinerator provides treatment of Lilly hazardous and non-hazardous waste 

to support its operational requirements, including containerized waste (hazardous and 

non-hazardous), high Btu liquids (primary waste) and low Btu liquids (secondary waste). 

The T149 incinerator consists of a rotary kiln and vertical up-fired secondary combustion 

chamber (SCC), a wet ash handling system, a NOx abatement system, a wet quench 

system, a condenser/absorber, a particulate matter scrubber, an induced draft (ID) fan, 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 7 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

and a stack with continuous emissions monitoring. The detailed equipment list is located 

in Section D.13 of this permit. 

(n) D.14 BPM Control Systems – RTO Operations: The regenerative thermal oxidizer 

(RTO) system consists of a closed-vent system that transports fume streams exhausted 

from the BPM manufacturing and support operations to the RTOs. The RTOs, designed 

to thermally destruct the VOC and/or VOHAP laden fume streams from the process and 

support operations, are also equipped with caustic scrubbing systems to control 

hydrogen halide and halogen emissions. The detailed equipment list is located in Section 

D.14 of this permit. 

(o) D.15 BPM Control Systems – T79 Fume Incinerator Operations: The T79 fume 

incinerator system consists of a closed-vent system that transports fume streams 

exhausted from the BPM manufacturing and support operations to the T79 incinerator. 

The T79 incinerator, designed to thermally destruct the VOC and/or VOHAP laden fume 

streams from the process and support operations, are also equipped with caustic 

scrubbing systems to control hydrogen halide and halogen emissions. The detailed 

equipment list is located in Section D.15 of this permit. 

(p) D.18 BPM – Chemical Wastewater Treatment Plant: The wastewater generated from the 

BPM operations is collected in wastewater holding tanks, transferred through a 

clarification process, followed by the biological treatment facility. The detailed equipment 

list is located in Section D.18 of this permit. 

A.3 Insignificant Activities [326 IAC 2-7-1(21)] [326 IAC 2-7-4(c)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

(a) This stationary source consists of the following insignificant activities, which are 

specifically regulated, as defined in 326 IAC 2-7-1(21): 

(1) D.3 Fermented Products - Fermentation Operations: Various mixers, bump tanks 

and fermenter tanks in the fermentation operations each emitting less than 5 

pounds PM10 per hour or 25 pounds PM10 per day. [326 IAC 6-3] 

(2) D.8 BPM Individual Drain Systems (IDSs): Individual drain systems (sumps) in 

the BPM operating areas each emitting less than less than 3 pounds VOC per 

hour or 15 pounds VOC per day. [40 CFR 63.1256(e), 40 CFR 63.689(b), and 

326 IAC 2-2] 

(3) D.10 BPM Support – Waste Storage Tank Operations: Various BPM waste tanks 

and knock out pots in the BPM operating areas each emitting less than 3 pounds 

VOC per hour or 15 pounds VOC per day. [40 CFR 63.1256(b), 40 CFR 63.685, 

40 CFR 60.110b, 326 IAC 2-2, and 326 IAC 8-5-3] 

(4) D.11 BPM Waste Containers: Small and large waste containers in the BPM 

operating areas each emitting less than less than 3 pounds VOC per hour or 15 

pounds VOC per day. [40 CFR 63.1256(d), 40 CFR 63.688, 326 IAC 2-2] 

(5) D.6 BPM Production Operations: Heat exchange systems in the BPM operating 

areas are classified as insignificant activities under the closed loop heating and 

cooling system clause pursuant to 326 IAC 2-7-1(21)(FF). [40 CFR 63.1252(c)] 

(6) D.16 Research and Development Operations: The T71 equipment components 

from process piping systems, including pumps, valves, and piping connections 

[flanges] are classified as insignificant activities under the research and 

development facility clause pursuant to 326 IAC 2-7-1(21)(E). [40 CFR 63.1255 

and 40 CFR 61, Subpart V] 

(b) This stationary source consists of the following types of insignificant activities, as defined 

in 326 IAC 2-7-1 (21) that do not have applicable requirements: 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 8 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(1) Natural gas-fired combustion sources with heat input equal to or less than 10 

MMBtu per hour; 

(2) Propane or liquefied petroleum gas, or butane-fired combustion sources with 

heat input equal to or less than 6 MMBtu per hour; 

(3) Equipment powered by internal combustion engines of capacity equal to or less 

than 0.5 MMBtu per hour, except where total capacity of equipment operated by 

one stationary source exceeds 2 MMBtu per hour; 

(4) A gasoline fuel transfer and dispensing operation handling less than or equal to 

1300 gallons per day, such as filling of tanks, locomotives, automobiles, having a 

storage capacity less than or equal to 10,500 gallons; 

(5) A petroleum fuel, other than gasoline, dispensing facility, having a storage 

capacity of less than or equal to 10,500 gallons, and dispensing less than or 

equal to 230,000 gallons per month; 

(6) VOC/HAP storage tanks with capacity less than or equal to 1,000 gallons and 

annual throughputs less than 12,000 gallons; 

(7) VOC/HAP vessels storing lubricating oils, hydraulic oils, machining oils, and 

machining fluids; 

(8) Refractory storage not requiring air pollution control equipment; 

(9) Machining where an aqueous cutting coolant continuously floods the machining 

interface; 

(10) Degreasing operations that do not exceed 145 gallons of solvent usage per 12 

months, except if subject to 326 IAC 20-6; 

(11) Cleaners and solvents having a vapor pressure equal to or less than 2kPa 

measured at 38°C or having a vapor pressure equal to or less than 0.7kPa 

measured at 20°C and not exceeding a combined usage rate of 145 gallons per 

12 months; 

(12) Closed loop heating and cooling systems; [See Section D.2] 

(13) Structural or fabrication cutting 200,000 linear feet or less of one inch plate or 

equivalent or using 80 tons or less of welding consumables; 

(14) Activities associated with the treatment of wastewater streams with an oil and 

grease content less than or equal to 1% by volume; 

(15) Activities associated with the transportation and treatment of sanitary sewage, 

provided discharge to the treatment plant is under the control of the 

owner/operator, that is, an on-site sewage treatment facility; 

(16) Any operation using aqueous solutions containing less than 1% by weight of 

VOCs excluding HAPs; 

(17) Forced and induced draft noncontact cooling tower systems not regulated under 

a NESHAP; 

(18) Replacement or repair of electrostatic precipitators, bags in baghouses and filters 

in other air filtration equipment; 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 9 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(19) Heat exchanger cleaning and repair; 

(20) Process vessel degassing and cleaning to prepare for internal repairs; 

(21) Stockpiled soils from soil remediation activities that are covered and waiting 

transport for disposal; 

(22) Paved and unpaved roads and parking lots with public access; 

(23) Covered conveyors for coal or coke conveying of less than or equal to 360 tons 

per day; [See Section D.1] 

(24) Coal bunker and coal scale exhausts and associated dust collector vents; 

(25) Asbestos abatement projects regulated by 326 IAC 14-10; 

(26) Purging of gas lines and vessels that is related to routine maintenance and repair 

of buildings, structures, or vehicles at the source where air emissions from those 

activities would not be associated with any production process; 

(27) Equipment used to collect any material that might be released during a 

malfunction, process upset, or spill cleanup, including catch tanks, temporary 

liquid separators, tanks and fluid handling equipment; 

(28) Blowdown from sight glasses; boilers; compressors; pumps; and cooling towers; 

(29) On-site fire and emergency response training approved by the department; 

(30) Gasoline emergency generators not exceeding 110 horsepower; 

(31) Diesel emergency generators not exceeding 1600 horsepower; [See Section D.2] 

(32) Natural gas emergency turbines or reciprocating engines not exceeding 16,000 

horsepower; 

(33) Other emergency equipment such as stationary fire pumps; [See Section D.2] 

(34) Grinding and machining operations controlled with fabric filters, scrubbers, mist 

collectors, wet collectors and electrostatic precipitators with a design grain 

loading of less than or equal to 0.03 grains per actual cubic foot and a gas flow 

rate less than or equal to 4000 actual cubic feet per minute, including deburring, 

buffing, polishing, abrasive blasting, pneumatic conveying, and woodworking 

operations; 

(35) Purge double block and bleed valves; 

(36) Filter or coalescer media changeout; 

(37) Vents from ash transport systems not operated at positive pressures; 

(38) A laboratory as defined in 326 IAC 2-7-1(21)(D); 

(39) Research and development facility as defined in 326 AIC 2-7-1(E); [See Section 

D.21] 

(40) Farm operations; and 

(41) Other activities below insignificant threshold levels: 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 10 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(A) Portable cleaning and collection tanks less than 3 pounds VOC per hour 

or 15 pounds VOC per day; 

(B) T4 sulfuric acid tank less than 5 pounds PM10 per day or 25 pounds 

PM10 per day; 

(C) T47 trash transfer less than 5 pounds PM10 per day or 25 pounds PM10 

per day; 

(D) Sump tanks less than 3 pounds VOC per hour or 15 pounds VOC per 

day; 

(E) T116 hydrochloric acid tank less than 5 pounds single HAP per day or 1 

ton single HAP per year; 

(F) T14 Ranney Well less than 5 pounds single HAP per day or 1 ton single 

HAP per year; 

(G) T99 ethylene glycol expansion tanks/system less than 12.5 pounds 

combined HAP per day or 2.5 tons combined HAP per year; 

(H) T100 MACE tanks/system less than 12.5 pounds per day or 2.5 tons 

combined HAP per year; 

(I) T100 Unit 1 drumming operations less than 5 pounds PM10 per day or 

25 pounds PM10 per day; 

(J) T99/T100 solids particle sizing equipment (mills and delumpers) less 

than 5 pounds PM10 per day or 25 pounds PM10 per day; and 

(K) Various fermentation and purification operations less than 3 pounds VOC 

per hour or 15 pounds VOC per day, less than 12.5 pounds per day or 

2.5 tons combined HAP per year; and less than 5 pounds PM10 per day 

or 25 pounds PM10 per day. [See Section D.3 and D.4] 

A.4 Part 70 Permit Applicability [326 IAC 2-7-2] 

This stationary source is required to have a Part 70 permit by 326 IAC 2-7-2 (Applicability) 

because: 

(a) It is a major source, as defined in 326 IAC 2-7-1(22); and 

(b) It is a source in a source category designated by the United States Environmental 

Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) under 40 CFR 70.3 (Part 70 - Applicability). 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 11 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION B GENERAL CONDITIONS

B.1 Definitions [326 IAC 2-7-1] 

Terms in this permit shall have the definition assigned to such terms in the referenced regulation. 

In the absence of definitions in the referenced regulation, the applicable definitions found in the 

statutes or regulations (IC 13-11, 326 IAC 1-2 and 326 IAC 2-7) shall prevail. 

B.2 Permit Term [326 IAC 2-7-5(2)] [326 IAC 2-1.1-9.5] [326 IAC 2-7-4(a)(1)(D)] [IC 13-15-3-6(a)] 

(a) This permit, T157-6879-00006, is issued for a fixed term of five (5) years from the 

issuance date of this permit, as determined in accordance with IC 4-21.5-3-5(f) and IC 

13-15-5-3. Subsequent revisions, modifications, or amendments of this permit do not 

affect the expiration date of this permit. 

(b) If IDEM, OAQ, upon receiving a timely and complete renewal permit application, fails to 

issue or deny the permit renewal prior to the expiration date of this permit, this existing 

permit shall not expire and all terms and conditions shall continue in effect, including any 

permit shield provided in 326 IAC 2-7-15, until the renewal permit has been issued or 

denied. 

B.3 Enforceability [326 IAC 2-7-7] 

Unless otherwise stated, all terms and conditions in this permit, including any provisions designed 

to limit the source's potential to emit, are enforceable by IDEM, the United States Environmental 

Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) and by citizens in accordance with the Clean Air Act. 

B.4 Termination of Right to Operate [326 IAC 2-7-10] [326 IAC 2-7-4(a)] 

The Permittee's right to operate this source terminates with the expiration of this permit unless a 

timely and complete renewal application is submitted at least nine (9) months prior to the date of 

expiration of the source’s existing permit, consistent with 326 IAC 2-7-3 and 326 IAC 2-7-4(a). 

B.5 Severability [326 IAC 2-7-5(5)] 

The provisions of this permit are severable; a determination that any portion of this permit is 

invalid shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the permit. 

B.6 Property Rights or Exclusive Privilege [326 IAC 2-7-5(6)(D)] 

This permit does not convey any property rights of any sort or any exclusive privilege. 

B.7 Duty to Provide Information [326 IAC 2-7-5(6)(E)] 

(a) The Permittee shall furnish to IDEM, OAQ, within a reasonable time, any information that 

IDEM, OAQ, may request in writing to determine whether cause exists for modifying, 

revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit, or to determine compliance with this 

permit. The submittal by the Permittee does require the certification by the “responsible 

official” as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). Upon request, the Permittee shall also furnish 

to IDEM, OAQ, copies of records required to be kept by this permit. 

(b) For information furnished by the Permittee to IDEM, OAQ, the Permittee may include a 

claim of confidentiality in accordance with 326 IAC 17.1. When furnishing copies of 

requested records directly to U. S. EPA, the Permittee may assert a claim of 

confidentiality in accordance with 40 CFR 2, Subpart B. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 12 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

B.8 Certification [326 IAC 2-7-4(f)] [326 IAC 2-7-6(1)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)(C)] 

(a) Where specifically designated by this permit or required by an applicable requirement, 

any application form, report, or compliance certification submitted shall contain 

certification by a responsible official of truth, accuracy, and completeness. This 

certification shall state that, based on information and belief formed after reasonable 

inquiry, the statements and information in the document are true, accurate, and complete. 

(b) One (1) certification shall be included, using the attached Certification Form, with each 

submittal requiring certification. One (1) certification may cover multiple forms in one (1) 

submittal. 

(c) A responsible official is defined at 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

B.9 Annual Compliance Certification [326 IAC 2-7-6(5)] 

(a) The Permittee shall annually submit a compliance certification report which addresses 

the status of the source’s compliance with the terms and conditions contained in this 

permit, including emission limitations, standards, or work practices. The initial 

certification shall cover the time period from the date of final permit issuance through 

December 31 of the same year. All subsequent certifications shall cover the time period 

from January 1 to December 31 of the previous year, and shall be submitted in letter form 

no later than July 1 of each year to: 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management 

Compliance Branch, Office of Air Quality 

100 North Senate Avenue 

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2251 

and 

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region V 

Air and Radiation Division, Air Enforcement Branch - Indiana (AE-17J) 

77 West Jackson Boulevard 

Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590 

(b) The annual compliance certification report required by this permit shall be considered 

timely if the date postmarked on the envelope or certified mail receipt, or affixed by the 

shipper on the private shipping receipt, is on or before the date it is due. If the document 

is submitted by any other means, it shall be considered timely if received by IDEM, OAQ, 

on or before the date it is due. 

(c) The annual compliance certification report shall include the following: 

(1) The appropriate identification of each term or condition of this permit that is the 

basis of the certification; 

(2) The compliance status; 

(3) Whether compliance was continuous or intermittent; 

(4) The methods used for determining the compliance status of the source, currently 

and over the reporting period consistent with 326 IAC 2-7-5(3); and 

(5) Such other facts, as specified in Sections D of this permit, as IDEM, OAQ, may 

require to determine the compliance status of the source. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 13 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

The submittal by the Permittee does require the certification by the “responsible official” 

as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

B.10 Preventive Maintenance Plan [326 IAC 2-7-5(1), (3) and (13)] [326 IAC 2-7-6(1) and (6)] 

[326 IAC 1-6-3] 

(a) If required by specific condition(s) in Section D of this permit, the Permittee shall prepare 

and maintain Preventive Maintenance Plans (PMPs) within ninety (90) days after 

issuance of this permit, including the following information on each facility: 

(1) Identification of the individual(s) responsible for inspecting, maintaining, and 

repairing emission control devices; 

(2) A description of the items or conditions that will be inspected and the inspection 

schedule for said items or conditions; and 

(3) Identification and quantification of the replacement parts that will be maintained 

in inventory for quick replacement. 

If, due to circumstances beyond the Permittee’s control, the PMPs cannot be prepared 

and maintained within the above timeframe, the Permittee may extend the date an 

additional ninety (90) days provided the Permittee notifies: 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management 

Compliance Branch, Office of Air Quality 

100 North Senate Avenue 

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2251 

The PMP extension notification does not require the certification by the “responsible 

official” as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

(b) The Permittee shall implement the PMPs, including any required record keeping, as 

necessary to ensure that failure to implement a PMP does not cause or contribute to an 

exceedance of any limitation on emissions or potential to emit. 

(c) A copy of the PMPs shall be submitted to IDEM, OAQ, upon request and within a 

reasonable time, and shall be subject to review and approval by IDEM, OAQ. IDEM, 

OAQ may require the Permittee to revise its PMPs whenever lack of proper maintenance 

causes or is the primary contributor to an exceedance of any limitation on emissions or 

potential to emit. The PMP does not require the certification by the “responsible official” 

as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

(d) To the extent the Permittee is required by 40 CFR Part 60/63 to have an Operation, 

Maintenance, and Monitoring (OMM) Plan for a unit, such Plan is deemed to satisfy the 

PMP requirements of 326 IAC 1-6-3 for that unit and, otherwise, such Plan is deemed to 

satisfy the applicable PMP requirements for that unit. 

B.11 Emergency Provisions [326 IAC 2-7-16] 

(a) An emergency, as defined in 326 IAC 2-7-1(12), is not an affirmative defense for an 

action brought for noncompliance with a federal or state health-based emission limitation. 

(b) An emergency, as defined in 326 IAC 2-7-1(12), constitutes an affirmative defense to an 

action brought for noncompliance with a technology-based emission limitation if the 

affirmative defense of an emergency is demonstrated through properly signed, 

contemporaneous operating logs or other relevant evidence that describe the following: 

(1) An emergency occurred and the Permittee can, to the extent possible, identify 

the causes of the emergency; 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 14 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(2) The permitted facility was at the time being properly operated; 

(3) During the period of an emergency, the Permittee took all reasonable steps to 

minimize levels of emissions that exceeded the emission standards or other 

requirements in this permit; 

(4) For each emergency lasting one (1) hour or more, the Permittee notified IDEM, 

OAQ, within four (4) daytime business hours after the beginning of the 

emergency, or after the emergency was discovered or reasonably should have 

been discovered; 

Telephone Number: 1-800-451-6027 (ask for Office of Air Quality, 

Compliance Section), or 

Telephone Number: 317-233-0178 (ask for Compliance Section) 

Facsimile Number: 317-233-6865 

(5) For each emergency lasting one (1) hour or more, the Permittee submitted the 

attached Emergency Occurrence Report Form or its equivalent, either by mail or 

facsimile to: 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management 

Compliance Branch, Office of Air Quality 

100 North Senate Avenue 

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2251 

within two (2) working days of the time when emission limitations were exceeded 

due to the emergency. 

The notice fulfills the requirement of 326 IAC 2-7-5(3)(C)(ii) and must contain the 

following: 

(A) A description of the emergency; 

(B) Any steps taken to mitigate the emissions; and 

(C) Corrective actions taken. 

The notification, which shall be submitted by the Permittee, does not require the 

certification by the “responsible official” as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

(6) The Permittee immediately took all reasonable steps to correct the emergency. 

(c) In any enforcement proceeding, the Permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an 

emergency has the burden of proof. 

(d) This emergency provision supersedes 326 IAC 1-6 (Malfunctions). This permit condition 

is in addition to any emergency or upset provision contained in any applicable 

requirement. 

(e) IDEM, OAQ, may require that the Preventive Maintenance Plans required under 326 IAC 

2-7-4(c)(9) be revised in response to an emergency. 

(f) Failure to notify IDEM, OAQ, by telephone or facsimile of an emergency lasting more 

than one (1) hour in accordance with (b)(4) and (5) of this condition shall constitute a 

violation of 326 IAC 2-7 and any other applicable rules. 

(g) If the emergency situation causes a deviation from a technology-based limit, the 

Permittee may continue to operate the affected emitting facilities during the emergency 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 15 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

provided the Permittee immediately takes all reasonable steps to correct the emergency 

and minimize emissions. 

(h) The Permittee shall include all emergencies in the Quarterly Deviation and Compliance 

Monitoring Report. 

B.12 Permit Shield [326 IAC 2-7-15] [326 IAC 2-7-20] [326 IAC 2-7-12] 

(a) Pursuant to 326 IAC 2-7-15, the Permittee has been granted a permit shield. The permit 

shield provides that compliance with the conditions of this permit shall be deemed 

compliance with any applicable requirements as of the date of permit issuance, provided 

that either the applicable requirements are included and specifically identified in this 

permit or the permit contains an explicit determination or concise summary of a 

determination that other specifically identified requirements are not applicable. The 

Indiana statutes from IC 13 and rules from 326 IAC, referenced in conditions in this 

permit, are those applicable at the time the permit was issued. The issuance or 

possession of this permit shall not alone constitute a defense against an alleged violation 

of any law, regulation or standard, except for the requirement to obtain a Part 70 permit 

under 326 IAC 2-7 or for applicable requirements for which a permit shield has been 

granted. 

This permit shield does not extend to applicable requirements, which are promulgated 

after the date of issuance of this permit unless this permit has been modified to reflect 

such new requirements. 

(b) In addition to the nonapplicability determinations set forth in Sections D of this permit, the 

IDEM, OAQ has made the following determination regarding this source: 

(1) 40 CFR 60, Subpart D – Fossil-fuel fired steam generating units: This 

source is not subject to 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart D because none of the boilers 

at the plant site exceed 250 MMBtu/hr in heat input capacity. [40 CFR 

60.40(a)(1)] 

(2) 40 CFR 60, Subpart Db – Industrial-Commercial-Institutional steam 

generating units: This source is not subject to 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Db 

because none of the boilers at plant site were constructed, reconstructed, or 

modified after June 19, 1984. [40 CFR 60.40b(a)] 

(3) 40 CFR 60, Subpart Dc – Industrial-Commercial-Institutional steam 

generating units: This source is not subject to 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Dc 

because none of the boilers at plant site were constructed, reconstructed, or 

modified after June 9, 1989. [40 CFR 60.40c(a)] 

(4) 40 CFR 60, Subpart E – Incinerators: This source is not subject to 40 CFR 

Part 60, Subpart E because none of the incinerators at plant site exceed a 

charging rate of 50 metric tons per day. [40 CFR 60.50(a)] 

(5) 40 CFR 60, Subparts Ec and CCCC – Hospital/Medical/Infectious waste 

incinerators and Commercial-Industrial solid waste incinerators: This 

source is not subject to 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart Ec or Subpart CCCC because 

the combustors at the site are required to have a permit pursuant to Section 3005 

of the Solid Waste Disposal Act. [40 CFR 60.50c(d) and 40 CFR 60.2020(g)] 

(6) 40 CFR 60, Subparts VV, III, NNN and RRR – Synthetic organic chemical 

manufacturing: This source is not subject to 40 CFR Part 60, Subparts VV, III, 

NNN, and RRR because the source is not engaged in the manufacture of 

synthetic organic chemicals as defined by those standards. The source does not 

produce, as an intermediate, final product, co-product, or by-product, a chemical 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 16 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

listed in 40 CFR 60.489 [Subpart VV], 40 CFR 60.617 [Subpart III], 40 CFR 

60.667 [Subpart NNN], or 40 CFR 60.707 [Subpart RRR]. 

(7) Section 111(d) Emission Guidelines: None of the emission guidelines in 40 

CFR Part 60, 40 CFR Part 62, Subpart P, and 326 IAC 11 are applicable to this 

source because the source does not own or operate an affected facility subject to 

those requirements. 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ce and 326 IAC 11-6, and 40 

CFR Part 60, Subpart DDDD and 326 IAC 11-8 are not applicable to this source 

because combustors at the site are required to have a permit pursuant to Section 

3005 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act. [40 CFR 60.32e(d) and 40 CFR 

60.2555(g)] 

(8) 40 CFR 61, Subpart C – Beryllium: This source is not subject to 40 CFR Part 

61, Subpart C and 326 IAC 14-3 because the incinerators at the source do not 

incinerate beryllium containing waste. [40 CFR 61.30(a) and 40 CFR 61.31(g)] 

(9) 40 CFR 61, Subpart E – Mercury: This source is not subject to 40 CFR Part 61, 

Subpart E and 326 IAC 14-5, which applies to, among other things, incinerators 

burning wastewater treatment plant sludge because the source does not 

incinerate wastewater treatment plant sludge in its incinerators. 

(10) 40 CFR 61, Subpart FF – Benzene Waste Operations: This source does not 

handle more than 10 megagrams of benzene waste per year. Therefore the 

source is not subject to requirements of 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart FF. 

(11) 40 CFR 63, Subparts F and G – Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing:

This source is not subject to 40 CFR Part 63, Subparts F and G (326 IAC 20-10) 

because the source does not manufacture compounds listed in table 1 of Subpart 

F or use as a reactant compounds listed in table 2 of Subpart F. [40 CFR 

63.100(b)] 

(12) 40 CFR 63, Subpart O – Ethylene Oxide Sterilizers: This source is not subject 

to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart O and 326 IAC 20-5 because the source does not 

utilize ethylene oxide in sterilization operations. [40 CFR 63.360] 

(13) 40 CFR 63, Subpart Q – Industrial Process Cooling Towers: This source is 

not subject to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart Q and 326 IAC 20-4 because the source 

does not utilize chromium based water treatment compounds in its cooling 

towers. [40 CFR 63.400] 

(14) 40 CFR 63, Subpart T – Halogenated Solvent Cleaning: This source is not 

subject to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart T and 326 IAC 20-6 because the source 

does not use halogenated solvents in any solvent cleaning machines. [40 CFR 

63.460] 

(15) 40 CFR 63, Subpart YY – Generic MACT categories: This source is not subject 

to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YY and 326 IAC 20-44 because the source is not 

one of the source categories described in 40 CFR 63.1103. [40 CFR 63.1100] 

(16) 40 CFR 63, Subpart MMM – Pesticide Active Ingredient Production: This 

source is not subject to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart MMM and 326 IAC 20-45 

because the source does not contain any pesticide active ingredient process 

units or associated equipment as described in 40 CFR 63.1360. [40 CFR 

63.1360] 

(17) 326 IAC 6-5 – Fugitive Particulate Matter Emission Limitations: This source 

does not have potential fugitive dust emissions greater than 25 tons per year, 

and is therefore, not subject to the requirements of this rule. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 17 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(18) 326 IAC 8-3 – Organic Solvent Degreasing Operations: This source does not 

own or operate degreasing facilities containing organic solvent. Therefore, the 

requirements of 326 IAC 8-3-3/326 IAC 8-3-6 do not apply. 

(19) 40 CFR 63, Subpart FFFF – Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Production and 

Processes: This source is not subject to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart FFFF because 

all the affected facilities at the source that would otherwise be subject to Subpart 

FFFF are subject to 40 CFR 63, Subpart GGG. 

(20) 40 CFR 63, Subpart GGGGG – Site Remediation: This source is not subject to 

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGGGG because the site remediation activities at 

Tippecanoe Laboratories are being performed under a RCRA corrective action 

program at a treatment, storage and disposal facility. 

(21) 326 IAC 8-4 – Petroleum Sources: This source does not operate any facilities 

subject to the requirements of 326 IAC 8-4. 326 IAC 8-4-6 is not applicable to 

this source because the source does not accept deliveries of gasoline by 

transports, as defined by 326 IAC 1-2-84. 

(22) 326 IAC 8-6 – Organic Solvent Emissions Limitations: The provisions of 326 

IAC 8-6 are not applicable to this source because the source is subject to other 

rules in 326 IAC 8. 

(23) 326 IAC 10 – Nitrogen Oxide Rules: This source does not contain any 

emission units identified in 326 IAC 10-4. Therefore, the source is not subject to 

the NOx emission control requirements of that rule. 

(24) 326 IAC 11 – Emission Limitations for Specific Types of Operations: This 

source does not contain any emission units described in 326 IAC 11. Therefore, 

the source is not subject to the requirements of those rules. 

(25) 326 IAC 15 – Lead Rules: This source does not contain any emission units 

described in 326 IAC 15. Therefore, the source is not subject to the 

requirements of those rules. 

(26) 326 IAC 21 – Acid Deposition: This source does not contain any emission units 

described in 326 IAC 21. Therefore, the source is not subject to the 

requirements of those rules. 

(c) If, after issuance of this permit, it is determined that the permit is in nonconformance with 

an applicable requirement that applied to the source on the date of permit issuance, 

IDEM, OAQ, shall immediately take steps to reopen and revise this permit and issue a 

compliance order to the Permittee to ensure expeditious compliance with the applicable 

requirement until the permit is reissued. The permit shield shall continue in effect so long 

as the Permittee is in compliance with the compliance order. 

(d) No permit shield shall apply to any permit term or condition that is determined after 

issuance of this permit to have been based on erroneous information supplied in the 

permit application. Erroneous information means information that the Permittee knew to 

be false, or in the exercise of reasonable care should have been known to be false, at the 

time the information was submitted. 

(e) Nothing in 326 IAC 2-7-15 or in this permit shall alter or affect the following: 

(1) The provisions of Section 303 of the Clean Air Act (emergency orders), including 

the authority of the U.S. EPA under Section 303 of the Clean Air Act; 

(2) The liability of the Permittee for any violation of applicable requirements prior to 

or at the time of this permit's issuance; 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 18 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(3) The applicable requirements of the acid rain program, consistent with Section 

408(a) of the Clean Air Act; and 

(4) The ability of U.S. EPA to obtain information from the Permittee under Section 

114 of the Clean Air Act. 

(f) This permit shield is not applicable to any change made under 326 IAC 2-7-20(b)(2) 

(Sections 502(b)(10) of the Clean Air Act changes) and 326 IAC 2-7-20(c)(2) (trading 

based on State Implementation Plan (SIP) provisions). 

(g) This permit shield is not applicable to modifications eligible for group processing until 

after IDEM, OAQ has issued the modifications. [326 IAC 2-7-12(c)(7)] 

(h) This permit shield is not applicable to minor Part 70 permit modifications until after IDEM, 

OAQ has issued the modification. [326 IAC 2-7-12(b)(8)] 

B.13 Prior Permits Superseded [326 IAC 2-1.1-9.5] 

(a) Terms and conditions of previous permits issued pursuant to permitting programs 

approved into the state implementation plan have been either 

(1) incorporated as originally stated, 

(2) revised, or 

(3) deleted 

by this permit. 

(b) All previous registrations and permits are superseded by this permit. 

B.14 Deviations from Permit Requirements and Conditions [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)(C)(ii)] 

(a) Deviations from any permit requirements (for emergencies see Section B - Emergency 

Provisions), the probable cause of such deviations, and any response steps or preventive 

measures taken shall be reported to: 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management 

Compliance Data Section, Office of Air Quality 

100 North Senate Avenue 

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2251 

using the attached Quarterly Deviation and Compliance Monitoring Report, or its 

equivalent. A deviation required to be reported pursuant to an applicable requirement 

that exists independent of this permit, shall be reported according to the schedule stated 

in the applicable requirement and does not need to be included in this report. 

The Quarterly Deviation and Compliance Monitoring Report does require the certification 

by the “responsible official” as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

(b) A deviation is an exceedance of a permit limitation or a failure to comply with a 

requirement of the permit. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 19 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

B.15 Permit Modification, Reopening, Revocation and Reissuance, or Termination [326 IAC 2-7-

5(6)(C)] [326 IAC 2-7-8(a)] [326 IAC 2-7-9] 

(a) This permit may be modified, reopened, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause. 

The filing of a request by the Permittee for a Part 70 permit modification, revocation and 

reissuance, or termination, or of a notification of planned changes or anticipated 

noncompliance does not stay any condition of this permit. [326 IAC 2-7-5(6)(C)] The 

notification by the Permittee does require the certification by the “responsible official” as 

defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

(b) This permit shall be reopened and revised under any of the circumstances listed in IC 13-

15-7-2 or if IDEM, OAQ, determines any of the following: 

(1) That this permit contains a material mistake. 

(2) That inaccurate statements were made in establishing the emissions standards 

or other terms or conditions. 

(3) That this permit must be revised or revoked to assure compliance with an 

applicable requirement. [326 IAC 2-7-9(a)(3)] 

(c) Proceedings by IDEM, OAQ to reopen and revise this permit shall follow the same 

procedures as apply to initial permit issuance and shall affect only those parts of this 

permit for which cause to reopen exists. Such reopening and revision shall be made as 

expeditiously as practicable. [326 IAC 2-7-9(b)] 

(d) The reopening and revision of this permit, under 326 IAC 2-7-9(a), shall not be initiated 

before notice of such intent is provided to the Permittee by IDEM, OAQ, at least thirty 

(30) days in advance of the date this permit is to be reopened, except that IDEM, OAQ 

may provide a shorter time period in the case of an emergency. [326 IAC 2-7-9(c)] 

B.16 Permit Renewal [326 IAC 2-7-3] [326 IAC 2-7-4] [326 IAC 2-7-8(e)] 

(a) The application for renewal shall be submitted using the application form or forms 

prescribed by IDEM, OAQ, and shall include the information specified in 326 IAC 2-7-4. 

Such information shall be included in the application for each emission unit at this source, 

except those emission units included on the trivial or insignificant activities list contained 

in 326 IAC 2-7-1(21) and 326 IAC 2-7-1(40). The renewal application does require the 

certification by the “responsible official” as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

Request for renewal shall be submitted to: 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management 

Permits Branch, Office of Air Quality 

100 North Senate Avenue, 

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2251 

(b) A timely renewal application is one that is: 

(1) Submitted at least nine (9) months prior to the date of the expiration of this 

permit; and 

(2) If the date postmarked on the envelope or certified mail receipt, or affixed by the 

shipper on the private shipping receipt, is on or before the date it is due. If the 

document is submitted by any other means, it shall be considered timely if 

received by IDEM, OAQ on or before the date it is due. 

(c) If the Permittee submits a timely and complete application for renewal of this permit, the 

source’s failure to have a permit is not a violation of 326 IAC 2-7 until IDEM, OAQ, takes 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 20 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

final action on the renewal application, except that this protection shall cease to apply if, 

subsequent to the completeness determination, the Permittee fails to submit by the 

deadline specified in writing by IDEM, OAQ, any additional information identified as being 

needed to process the application. 

B.17 Permit Amendment or Modification [326 IAC 2-7-11][326 IAC 2-7-12] 

(a) Permit amendments and modifications are governed by the requirements of 326 IAC 2-7-

11 or 326 IAC 2-7-12 whenever the Permittee seeks to amend or modify this permit. 

(b) Any application requesting an amendment or modification of this permit shall be 

submitted to: 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management 

Permits Branch, Office of Air Quality 

100 North Senate Avenue 

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2251 

Any such application shall be certified by the “responsible official” as defined by 

326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

(c) The Permittee may implement administrative amendment changes addressed in the 

request for an administrative amendment immediately upon submittal of the request. 

[326 IAC 2-7-11(c)(3)] 

(d) No permit amendment or modification is required for the addition, operation or removal of 

a nonroad engine, as defined in 40 CFR 89.2. 

B.18 Permit Revision Under Economic Incentives and Other Programs [326 IAC 2-7-5(8)] [326 IAC 2-

7-12(b)(2)] 

(a) No Part 70 permit revision shall be required under any approved economic incentives, 

marketable Part 70 permits, emissions trading, and other similar programs or processes 

for changes that are provided for in a Part 70 permit. 

(b) Notwithstanding 326 IAC 2-7-12(b)(1) and 326 IAC 2-7-12(c)(1), minor Part 70 permit 

modification procedures may be used for Part 70 modifications involving the use of 

economic incentives, marketable Part 70 permits, emissions trading, and other similar 

approaches to the extent that such minor Part 70 permit modification procedures are 

explicitly provided for in the applicable State Implementation Plan (SIP) or in applicable 

requirements promulgated or approved by the U.S. EPA. 

B.19 Operational Flexibility [326 IAC 2-7-20] [326 IAC 2-7-10.5] 

(a) The Permittee may make any change or changes at the source that are described in 326 

IAC 2-7-20(b), (c), or (e), without a prior permit revision, if each of the following conditions 

is met: 

(1) The changes are not modifications under any provision of Title I of the Clean Air 

Act; 

(2) Any preconstruction approval required by 326 IAC 2-7-10.5 have been obtained; 

(3) The changes do not result in emissions which exceed the limitations provided in 

this permit (whether expressed herein as a rate of emissions or in terms of total 

emissions); 

(4) The Permittee notifies the: 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 21 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management 

Permits Branch, Office of Air Quality 

100 North Senate Avenue 

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2251 

and 

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region V 

Air and Radiation Division, Regulation Development Branch - Indiana (AR-18J) 

77 West Jackson Boulevard 

Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590 

in advance of the change by written notification at least ten (10) days in advance 

of the proposed change. The Permittee shall attach every such notice to the 

Permittee's copy of this permit; and 

(5) The Permittee maintains records on-site, on a rolling five (5) year basis, which 

document all such changes and emission trades that are subject to 326 IAC 2-7-

20(b), (c), or (e). The Permittee shall make such records available, upon 

reasonable request, for public review. 

Such records shall consist of all information required to be submitted to IDEM, 

OAQ, in the notices specified in 326 IAC 2-7-20(b)(1), (c)(1), and (e)(2). 

(b) The Permittee may make Section 502(b)(10) of the Clean Air Act changes (this term is 

defined at 326 IAC 2-7-1(36)) without a permit revision, subject to the constraint of 326 

IAC 2-7-20(a). For each such Section 502(b)(10) of the Clean Air Act change, the 

required written notification shall include the following: 

(1) A brief description of the change within the source; 

(2) The date on which the change will occur; 

(3) Any change in emissions; and 

(4) Any permit term or condition that is no longer applicable as a result of the 

change. 

The notification, which shall be submitted, is not considered an application form, report or 

compliance certification. Therefore, the notification by the Permittee does not require the 

certification by the “responsible official” as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

(c) Emission Trades [326 IAC 2-7-20(c)] 

The Permittee may trade emissions increases and decreases at the source, where the 

applicable SIP provides for such emission trades without requiring a permit revision, 

subject to the constraints of Section (a) of this condition and those in 326 IAC 2-7-20(c). 

(d) Alternative Operating Scenarios [326 IAC 2-7-20(d)] 

The Permittee may make changes at the source within the range of alternative operating 

scenarios that are described in the terms and conditions of this permit in accordance with 

326 IAC 2-7-5(9). No prior notification of IDEM, OAQ, or U.S. EPA is required. 

(e) Backup fuel switches specifically addressed in, and limited under, Section D of this permit 

shall not be considered alternative operating scenarios. Therefore, the notification 

requirements of part (a) of this condition do not apply. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 22 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

B.20 Source Modification Requirement [326 IAC 2-7-10.5] 

A modification, construction, or reconstruction is governed by the requirements of 326 IAC 2, 326 

IAC 2-7-10.5. 

B.21 Inspection and Entry [326 IAC 2-7-6] [IC 13-14-2-2][IC 13-30-3-1] [IC 13-17-3-2] 

Upon presentation of proper identification cards, credentials, and other documents as may be 

required by law, and subject to the Permittee’s right under all applicable laws and regulations to 

assert that the information collected by the agency is confidential and entitled to be treated as 

such, the Permittee shall allow IDEM, OAQ, U.S. EPA, or an authorized representative to perform 

the following: 

(a) Enter upon the Permittee's premises where a Part 70 source is located, or emissions 

related activity is conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this 

permit; 

(b) As authorized by the Clean Air Act, IC 13-14-2-2, IC 13-17-3-2, and IC 13-30-3-1, have 

access to and copy any records that must be kept under the conditions of this permit; 

(c) As authorized by the Clean Air Act, IC 13-14-2-2, IC 13-17-3-2, and IC 13-30-3-1, inspect 

any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and air pollution control equipment), 

practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit; 

(d) As authorized by the Clean Air Act, IC 13-14-2-2, IC 13-17-3-2, and IC 13-30-3-1, sample 

or monitor substances or parameters for the purpose of assuring compliance with this 

permit or applicable requirements; and 

(e) As authorized by the Clean Air Act, IC 13-14-2-2, IC 13-17-3-2, and IC 13-30-3-1, utilize 

any photographic, recording, testing, monitoring, or other equipment for the purpose of 

assuring compliance with this permit or applicable requirements. 

B.22 Transfer of Ownership or Operational Control [326 IAC 2-7-11] 

(a) The Permittee must comply with the requirements of 326 IAC 2-7-11 whenever the 

Permittee seeks to change the ownership or operational control of the source and no 

other change in the permit is necessary. 

(b) Any application requesting a change in the ownership or operational control of the source 

shall contain a written agreement containing a specific date for transfer of permit 

responsibility, coverage and liability between the current and new Permittee. The 

application shall be submitted to: 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management 

Permits Branch, Office of Air Quality 

100 North Senate Avenue 

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2251 

The application which shall be submitted by the Permittee does require the certification 

by the "responsible official" as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

(c) The Permittee may implement administrative amendment changes addressed in the 

request for an administrative amendment immediately upon submittal of the request. [326 

IAC 2-7-11(c)(3)] 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 23 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

B.23 Annual Fee Payment [326 IAC 2-7-19] [326 IAC 2-7-5(7)] [326 IAC 2-1.1-7] 

(a) The Permittee shall pay annual fees to IDEM, OAQ, within thirty (30) calendar days of 

receipt of a billing. Pursuant to 326 IAC 2-7-19(b), if the Permittee does not receive a bill 

from IDEM, OAQ, the applicable fee is due April 1 of each year. 

(b) Except as provided in 326 IAC 2-7-19(e), failure to pay may result in administrative 

enforcement action or revocation of this permit. 

(c) The Permittee may call the following telephone numbers: 1-800-451-6027 or 317-233-

4230 (ask for OAQ, I/M & Billing Section), to determine the appropriate permit fee. 

B.24 Advanced Source Modification Approval [326 IAC 2-7-5(16)] [326 IAC 2-7-10.5] 

(a) The requirements to obtain a source modification approval under 326 IAC 2-7-10.5 or a 

permit modification under 326 IAC 2-7-12 are satisfied by this permit for the proposed 

emission units, control equipment or insignificant activities in Sections A.2 and A.3. 

(b) Pursuant to 326 IAC 2-1.1-9 any permit authorizing construction may be revoked if 

construction of the emission unit has not commenced within eighteen (18) months from 

the date of issuance of the permit, or if during the construction, work is suspended for a 

continuous period of one (1) year or more. 

B.25 Credible Evidence [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-6] [62 FR 8314] [326 IAC 1-1-6] 

For the purpose of submitting compliance certifications or establishing whether or not the 

Permittee has violated or is in violation of any condition of this permit, nothing in this permit shall 

preclude the use, including the exclusive use, of any credible evidence or information relevant to 

whether the Permittee would have been in compliance with the condition of this permit if the 

appropriate performance or compliance test or procedure had been performed. 

B.26 Term of Conditions [326 IAC 2-1.1-9.5] 

Notwithstanding the permit term of a permit to construct, a permit to operate, or a permit 

modification, any condition established in a permit issued pursuant to a permitting program 

approved in the state implementation plan shall remain in effect until: 

(a) the condition is modified in a subsequent permit action; or 

(b) the emissions unit to which the condition pertains permanently ceases operation. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 24 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION C SOURCE OPERATION CONDITIONS 

Entire Source 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

C.1 Particulate Emission Limitations For Processes with Process Weight Rates Less Than One 

Hundred (100) pounds per hour [326 IAC 6-3-2] 

Pursuant to 326 IAC 6-3-2(e)(2), particulate emissions from any process not exempt under 326 

IAC 6-3-1(b) or (c) which has a maximum process weight rate less than 100 pounds per hour and 

the methods in 326 IAC 6-3-2(b) through (d) do not apply shall not exceed 0.551 pounds per 

hour. 

C.2 Opacity [326 IAC 5-1] 

Pursuant to 326 IAC 5-1-2 (Opacity Limitations), except as provided in 326 IAC 5-1-3 (Temporary 

Alternative Opacity Limitations), opacity shall meet the following, unless otherwise stated in this 

permit: 

(a) Opacity shall not exceed an average of forty percent (40%) in any one (1) six (6) minute 

averaging period as determined in 326 IAC 5-1-4. 

(b) Opacity shall not exceed sixty percent (60%) for more than a cumulative total of fifteen 

(15) minutes (sixty (60) readings as measured according to 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, 

Method 9 or fifteen (15) one (1) minute nonoverlapping integrated averages for a 

continuous opacity monitor) in a six (6) hour period. 

C.3 Open Burning [326 IAC 4-1] [IC 13-17-9] 

The Permittee shall not open burn any material except as provided in 326 IAC 4-1-3, 326 IAC 4-

1-4 or 326 IAC 4-1-6. The previous sentence notwithstanding, the Permittee may open burn in 

accordance with an open burning approval issued by the Commissioner under 326 IAC 4-1-4.1. 

326 IAC 4-1-3 (a)(2)(A) and (B) are not federally enforceable. 

C.4 Fugitive Dust Emissions [326 IAC 6-4] 

The Permittee shall not allow fugitive dust to escape beyond the property line or boundaries of 

the property, right-of-way, or easement on which the source is located, in a manner that would 

violate 326 IAC 6-4 (Fugitive Dust Emissions). 326 IAC 6-4-2(4) is not federally enforceable. 

C.5 Reserved 

C.6 Stack Height [326 IAC 1-7] 

The Permittee shall comply with the applicable provisions of 326 IAC 1-7 (Stack Height 

Provisions), for all exhaust stacks through which a potential (before controls) of twenty-five (25) 

tons per year or more of particulate matter or sulfur dioxide is emitted. The provisions of 326 IAC 

1-7-2, 326 IAC 1-7-3(c) and (d), 326 IAC 1-7-4(d), (e), and (f), and 326 IAC 1-7-5(d) are not 

federally enforceable. 

C.7 Asbestos Abatement Projects [326 IAC 14-10] [326 IAC 18] [40 CFR 61, Subpart M] 

The Permittee shall comply with the applicable requirements of 326 IAC 14-10, 326 IAC 18, and 

40 CFR 61.140. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 25 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

The requirement in 326 IAC 14-10-1(a) that the owner or operator shall use an Indiana Accredited 

Asbestos Inspector and all the requirements in 326 IAC 18 related to licensing requirements for 

asbestos inspectors are not federally enforceable. 

Testing Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-6(1)] 

C.8 Performance Testing [326 IAC 3-6] 

(a) All testing shall be performed according to the provisions of 326 IAC 3-6 (Source 

Sampling Procedures), except as provided elsewhere in this permit, utilizing any 

applicable procedures and analysis methods specified in 40 CFR 51, 40 CFR 60, 40 CFR 

61, 40 CFR 63, 40 CFR 75, or other procedures approved by IDEM, OAQ. 

A test protocol, except as provided elsewhere in this permit, shall be submitted to: 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management 

Compliance Data Section, Office of Air Quality 

100 North Senate Avenue 

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2251 

no later than thirty-five (35) days prior to the intended test date. The protocol submitted 

by the Permittee does not require certification by the "responsible official" as defined by 

326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

(b) The Permittee shall notify IDEM, OAQ of the actual test date at least fourteen (14) days 

prior to the actual test date. The notification submitted by the Permittee does not require 

certification by the "responsible official" as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

(c) Pursuant to 326 IAC 3-6-4(b), all test reports must be received by IDEM, OAQ not later 

than forty-five (45) days after the completion of the testing. An extension may be granted 

by IDEM, OAQ, if the source submits to IDEM, OAQ, a reasonable written explanation 

not later than five (5) days prior to the end of the initial forty-five (45) day period. 

Compliance Requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11]

C.9 Compliance Requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11] 

The commissioner may require stack testing, monitoring, or reporting at any time to assure 

compliance with all applicable requirements by issuing an order under 326 IAC 2-1.1-11. Any 

monitoring or testing shall be performed in accordance with 326 IAC 3 or other methods approved 

by the commissioner or the U. S. EPA. 

Compliance Monitoring Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] [326 IAC 2-7-6(1)]

C.10 Compliance Monitoring [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-6(1)] [326 IAC 3-5] 

(a) This section applies to the operation and maintenance of equipment and devices 

specified in Section D of this permit to determine or monitor compliance, except that it 

does not apply to continuous emissions monitoring systems or continuous opacity 

monitoring systems described in Section D. Section C.11 (Maintenance of Continuous 

Emission Monitoring Equipment) establishes the general operation and maintenance 

requirements for continuous emission monitoring systems and continuous opacity 

monitoring systems. 

(b) Unless otherwise specified in this permit, all monitoring and record keeping requirements 

not already legally required shall be implemented within ninety (90) days of permit 

issuance. If required by Section D, the Permittee shall be responsible for installing any 

necessary equipment and initiating any required monitoring related to that equipment. If 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 26 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

due to circumstances beyond its control, that equipment cannot be installed and operated 

within ninety (90) days, the Permittee may extend the compliance schedule related to the 

equipment for an additional ninety (90) days provided the Permittee notifies: 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management 

Compliance Branch, Office of Air Quality 

100 North Senate Avenue 

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2251 

in writing, prior to the end of the initial ninety (90) day compliance schedule, with full 

justification of the reasons for the inability to meet this date. 

The notification, which shall be submitted by the Permittee, does require the certification 

by the “responsible official” as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

(c) Unless otherwise specified in the approval for the new emission unit(s), compliance 

monitoring for new emission units or emission units added through a source modification 

shall be implemented when operation begins. 

(d) The Permittee shall keep records of monitoring system operation that include the 

following: 

(1) All maintenance logs, calibration checks, and other required quality assurance 

activities. 

(2) All records of corrective and preventive action. 

(3) A log of monitoring system downtime, including the following: 

(A) Date of monitoring system downtime. 

(B) Time of commencement and completion of each downtime. 

(C) Reason for each downtime. 

(e) The Permittee shall submit a report of monitoring system downtime as specified in 

Section D. The report shall include the following: 

(1) Date of monitoring system downtime. 

(2) Time of commencement. 

(3) Duration of each downtime. 

(4) Reasons for each downtime. 

(5) Nature of system repairs and adjustments. 

(f) Except where permit conditions streamline similar applicable requirements pursuant to 

326 IAC 2-7-24, nothing in this permit nor in 326 IAC 3-5 supersedes the monitoring 

provisions in 40 CFR Part 60 or 40 CFR Part 63. 

C.11 Maintenance of Continuous Emission Monitoring Equipment [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)(A)(iii)] [326 IAC 2-

1.1-11] [326 IAC 3-5] 

(a) Unless otherwise specified in this permit, all monitoring and record keeping requirements 

not already legally required shall be implemented within ninety (90) days of permit 

issuance. If required by Section D, the Permittee shall be responsible for installing any 

necessary equipment and initiating any required monitoring related to that equipment. If 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 27 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

due to circumstances beyond its control, that equipment cannot be installed and operated 

within ninety (90) days, the Permittee may extend the compliance schedule related to the 

equipment for an additional ninety (90) days provided the Permittee notifies: 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management 

Compliance Branch, Office of Air Quality 

100 North Senate Avenue 

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2251 

in writing, prior to the end of the initial ninety (90) day compliance schedule, with full 

justification of the reasons for the inability to meet this date. 

The notification, which shall be submitted by the Permittee, does require the certification 

by the “responsible official” as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

(b) The Permittee shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate all necessary continuous 

emission monitoring systems (CEMS) and related equipment in accordance with 

applicable federal regulations and 326 IAC 3-5. 

(c) This provision applies only to CEMS operated solely for monitoring compliance with 

BACT limitations. The CEMS shall be operated at all times as specified in Section D, 

except during CEMS malfunctions, reasonable periods of necessary CEMS calibration or 

CEMS maintenance activities. CEMS calibration and maintenance activities shall be 

properly documented and shall be conducted pursuant to the standard operating 

procedures under 326 IAC 3-5-4(a). 

(d) The Permittee shall keep records in accordance with 326 IAC 3-5-6(b) that includes the 

following: 

(1) All documentation relating to: 

(A) design, installation, and testing of all elements of the monitoring system; 

and 

(B) required corrective action or compliance plan activities. 

(2) All maintenance logs, calibration checks, and other required quality assurance 

activities. 

(3) All records of corrective and preventive action. 

(4) A log of plant operations, including the following: 

(A) Date of facility downtime. 

(B) Time of commencement and completion of each downtime. 

(C) Reason for each downtime. 

(e) In accordance with 326 IAC 3-5-7(5), the Permittee shall submit reports of continuous 

monitoring system instrument downtime, except for zero (0) and span checks, which shall 

be reported separately. The reports shall include the following: 

(1) Date of downtime. 

(2) Time of commencement. 

(3) Duration of each downtime. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 28 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(4) Reasons for each downtime. 

(5) Nature of system repairs and adjustments. 

(f) Except where permit conditions streamline similar applicable requirements pursuant to 

326 IAC 2-7-24, nothing in this permit nor in 326 IAC 3-5 supersedes the monitoring 

provisions in 40 CFR Part 60 or 40 CFR Part 63. 

(g) The permittee shall prepare and submit to IDEM, OAQ a written report of the results of 

the calibration gas audits and relative accuracy test audits for each calendar quarter 

within thirty (30) calendar days after the end of each quarter. The report must contain the 

information required by 326 IAC 3-5-5(e)(2). 326 IAC 3-5-5(e)(2) is not federally 

enforceable. 

Corrective Actions and Response Steps [326 IAC 2-7-5] [326 IAC 2-7-6]

C.12 Emergency Reduction Plans [326 IAC 1-5-2] [326 IAC 1-5-3] 

Pursuant to 326 IAC 1-5-2 (Emergency Reduction Plans; Submission): 

(a) The Permittee prepared and submitted written emergency reduction plans (ERPs) 

consistent with safe operating procedures on December 13, 2000. 

(b) Upon direct notification by IDEM, OAQ, that a specific air pollution episode level is in 

effect, the Permittee shall immediately put into effect the actions stipulated in the 

approved ERP for the appropriate episode level. [326 IAC 1-5-3] 

C.13 Risk Management Plan [326 IAC 2-7-5(12)] [40 CFR 68] 

If a regulated substance, as defined in 40 CFR 68, is present at a source in more than a threshold 

quantity, the source must comply with the applicable requirements of 40 CFR 68. 

C.14 Compliance Response Plan - Preparation, Implementation, Records, and Reports [326 IAC 2-7-

5] [326 IAC 2-7-6] 

(a) Whenever a Testing and Monitoring condition establishes the requirement to implement a 

Compliance Response Plan (CRP), the Permittee shall prepare a CRP in conformance 

with this condition. If a Permittee is required to have an Operation, Maintenance and 

Monitoring (OMM) Plan (or Parametric Monitoring Plan and Start-up, Shutdown, and 

Malfunction (SSM) Plan) under 40 CFR 60/63, such plans shall be deemed to satisfy the 

requirements for a CRP for those monitoring conditions. A CRP shall be submitted to 

IDEM upon request. The CRP shall be prepared within ninety (90) days after issuance of 

this permit by the Permittee, supplemented from time to time by the Permittee, 

maintained on site, and comprised of: 

(1) Reasonable response steps that may be implemented in the event that a 

response step is needed pursuant to the requirements of Section D of this permit; 

and an expected timeframe for taking reasonable response steps. 

(2) If, at any time, the Permittee takes reasonable response steps that are not set 

forth in the Permittee’s current Compliance Response Plan or Operation, 

Maintenance and Monitoring (OMM) Plan (or Parametric Monitoring Plan and 

Start-up, Shutdown, and Malfunction (SSM) Plan) and the Permittee documents 

such response in accordance with subsection (e) below, the Permittee shall 

amend its Compliance Response Plan or Operation, Maintenance and Monitoring 

(OMM) Plan (or Parametric Monitoring Plan and Start-up, Shutdown, and 

Malfunction (SSM) Plan) to include such response steps taken. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 29 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

The OMM Plan (or Parametric Monitoring and SMM Plan) shall be submitted within the 

time frames specified by the applicable 40 CFR60/63 requirement. 

(b) Reasonable response steps shall be taken when indicated by the provisions of a 

monitoring condition as follows: 

(1) Reasonable response steps shall be taken as set forth in the Permittee’s current 

Compliance Response Plan or Operation, Maintenance and Monitoring (OMM) 

Plan (or Parametric Monitoring Plan and Start-up, Shutdown, and Malfunction 

(SSM) Plan); or 

(2) If none of the reasonable response steps listed in the Compliance Response 

Plan or Operation, Maintenance and Monitoring (OMM) Plan (or Parametric 

Monitoring Plan and Start-up, Shutdown, and Malfunction (SSM) Plan) is 

applicable or responsive to the excursion, the Permittee shall devise and 

implement additional response steps as expeditiously as practical. Taking such 

additional response steps shall not be considered a deviation from this permit so 

long as the Permittee documents such response steps in accordance with this 

condition. 

(3) If the Permittee determines that additional response steps would necessitate that 

the emissions unit or control device be shut down, and it will be ten (10) days or 

more until the unit or device will be shut down, then the Permittee shall promptly 

notify the IDEM, OAQ of the expected date of the shut down. The notification 

shall also include the status of the applicable compliance monitoring parameter 

with respect to normal, and the results of the response actions taken up to the 

time of notification. 

(4) Failure to take reasonable response steps shall be considered a deviation from 

the permit. 

(c) The Permittee is not required to take any further response steps for any of the following 

reasons: 

(1) A false reading occurs due to the malfunction of the monitoring equipment and 

prompt action was taken to correct the monitoring equipment. 

(2) The Permittee has determined that the monitoring parameters established in the 

permit conditions are technically inappropriate, has previously submitted a 

request for a minor permit modification to the permit, and such request has not 

been denied. 

(3) An automatic measurement was taken when the process was not operating. 

(4) The process has already returned or is returning to operating within “normal” 

parameters and no response steps are required. 

(d) When implementing reasonable steps in response to a monitoring condition, if the 

Permittee determines that an exceedance of an emission limitation has occurred, the 

Permittee shall report such deviations pursuant to Section B-Deviations from Permit 

Requirements and Conditions. 

(e) The Permittee shall record all instances when, in accordance with Section D, response 

steps are taken. In the event of an emergency, the provisions of 326 IAC 2-7-16 

(Emergency Provisions) requiring prompt corrective action to mitigate emissions shall 

prevail. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 30 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

C.14 Actions Related to Noncompliance Demonstrated by a Stack Test [326 IAC 2-7-5] [326 IAC 2-7-6] 

(a) When the results of a stack test performed in conformance with Section C - Performance 

Testing, of this permit exceed the level specified in any condition of this permit, the 

Permittee shall take appropriate response actions. The Permittee shall submit a 

description of these response actions to IDEM, OAQ, within thirty (30) days of receipt of 

the test results. The Permittee shall take appropriate action to minimize excess 

emissions from the affected facility while the response actions are being implemented. 

(b) A retest to demonstrate compliance shall be performed within one hundred twenty (120) 

days of receipt of the original test results. Should the Permittee demonstrate to IDEM, 

OAQ that retesting in one hundred and twenty (120) days is not practicable, IDEM, OAQ 

may extend the retesting deadline. 

(c) IDEM, OAQ reserves the authority to take any actions allowed under law in response to 

noncompliant stack tests. 

The response action documents submitted pursuant to this condition do require the certification 

by the “responsible official” as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-19]

C.15 Emission Statement [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)(C)(iii)][326 IAC 2-7-5(7)][326 IAC 2-7-19(c)][326 IAC 2-6] 

(a) Pursuant to 326 IAC 2-6-3(a)(1), the Permittee shall submit by July 1 of each year an 

emission statement covering the previous calendar year. The emission statement shall 

contain, at a minimum, the information specified in 326 IAC 2-6-4(c) and shall meet the 

following requirements: 

(1) Indicate estimated actual emissions of all pollutants listed in 326 IAC 2-6-4(a); 

(2) Indicate estimated actual emissions of regulated pollutants as defined by 326 

IAC 2-7-1(32) (“Regulated pollutant which is used only for purposes of Section 19 

of this rule”) from the source, for purposes of Part 70 fee assessment. 

The statement must be submitted to: 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management 

Technical Support and Modeling Section, Office of Air Quality 

100 North Senate Avenue 

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2251 

The emission statement does require the certification by the “responsible official” as 

defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

(b) The emission statement required by this permit shall be considered timely if the date 

postmarked on the envelope or certified mail receipt, or affixed by the shipper on the 

private shipping receipt, is on or before the date it is due. If the document is submitted by 

any other means, it shall be considered timely if received by IDEM, OAQ, on or before 

the date it is due. 

C.16 General Record Keeping Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-6] [326 IAC 2-2] 

(a) Records of all required monitoring data, reports and support information required by this 

permit shall be retained for a period of at least five (5) years from the date of monitoring 

sample, measurement, or report. These records shall be physically present or 

electronically accessible at the source location for a minimum of three (3) years. The 

records may be stored elsewhere for the remaining two (2) years as long as they are 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 31 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

available upon request. If the Commissioner makes a request for records to the 

Permittee, the Permittee shall furnish the records to the Commissioner within a 

reasonable time. 

(b) Unless otherwise specified in this permit, all record keeping requirements not already 

legally required shall be implemented within ninety (90) days of permit issuance. 

(c) If there is a reasonable possibility that a “project” (as defined in 326 IAC 2-2-1 (qq)) at an 

existing emissions unit, other than projects at a source with Plant-wide Applicability 

Limitation (PAL)), which is not part of a “major modification” (as defined in 326 IAC 2-2-1 

(ee)) may result in significant emissions increase and the Permittee elects to utilize the 

“projected actual emissions” (as defined in 326 IAC 2-2-1 (rr)), the Permittee shall comply 

with following: 

(1) construction of the “project” (as defined in 326 IAC 2-2-1 (qq) at an existing 

emissions unit, document and maintain the following records: 

(A) A description of the project. 

(B) Identification of any emissions unit whose emissions of a regulated new 

source review pollutant could be affected by the project. 

(C) A description of the applicability test used to determine that the project is 

not a major modification for any regulated NSR pollutant, including: 

(i) Baseline actual emissions; 

(ii) Projected actual emissions; 

(iii) Amount of emissions excluded under section 326 IAC 2-2-

1(rr)(2)(A)(iii); and 

(iv) An explanation for why the amount was excluded, and any 

netting calculations, if applicable. 

(2) Monitor the emissions of any regulated NSR pollutant that could increase as a 

result of the project and that is emitted by any existing emissions unit identified in 

(1)(B) above; and 

(3) Calculate and maintain a record of the annual emissions, in tons per year on a 

calendar year basis, for a period of five (5) years following resumption of regular 

operations after the change, or for a period of ten (10) years following resumption 

of regular operations after the change if the project increases the design capacity 

of or the potential to emit that regulated NSR pollutant at the emissions unit. 

C.17 General Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)(C)] [326 IAC 2-1.1-11][326 IAC 2-2] 

(a) The Permittee shall submit the attached Quarterly Deviation and Compliance Monitoring 

Report or its equivalent. Any deviation from permit requirements, the date(s) of each 

deviation, the cause of the deviation, and the response steps taken must be reported. 

This report shall be submitted within thirty (30) days of the end of the reporting period. 

The Quarterly Deviation and Compliance Monitoring Report shall include the certification 

by the “responsible official” as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

(b) The report required in (a) of this condition and reports required by conditions in Section D 

of this permit shall be submitted to: 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management 

Compliance Data Section, Office of Air Quality 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 32 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

100 North Senate Avenue 

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2251 

(c) Unless otherwise specified in this permit, any notice, report, or other submission required 

by this permit shall be considered timely if the date postmarked on the envelope or 

certified mail receipt, or affixed by the shipper on the private shipping receipt, is on or 

before the date it is due. If the document is submitted by any other means, it shall be 

considered timely if received by IDEM, OAQ, on or before the date it is due. 

(d) Unless otherwise specified in this permit, all reports required in Section D of this permit 

shall be submitted within thirty (30) days of the end of the reporting period. Unless 

otherwise specified in this permit, all reports do require the certification by the 

“responsible official” as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

(e) The first report shall cover the period commencing on the date of issuance of this permit 

and ending on the last day of the reporting period. Reporting periods are based on 

calendar years, unless otherwise specified in this permit. For the purpose of this permit 

“calendar year” means the twelve (12) month period from January 1 to December 31 

inclusive. 

(f) If the Permittee is required to comply with the recordkeeping provisions of (c) in Section 

C.17 for any “project” (as defined in 326 IAC 2-2-1 (qq)) at an existing emissions unit, and 

the project meets the following criteria, then the Permittee shall submit a report to IDEM, 

OAQ: 

(1) The annual emissions, in tons per year, from the project identified in (c)(1) in 

Section C.17 exceed the baseline actual emissions, as documented and 

maintained under Section C.17(c)(1)(C)(i), by a significant amount, as defined in 

326 IAC 2-2-1 (xx), for that regulated NSR pollutant, and 

(2) The emissions differ from the preconstruction projection as documented and 

maintained under Section C.17(c)(1)(C)(ii). 

(g) The report for project at an existing emissions unit shall be submitted within sixty (60) 

days after the end of the year and contain the following: 

(1) The name, address, and telephone number of the major stationary source. 

(2) The annual emissions calculated in accordance with (c)(2) and (3) in Section 

C.17. 

(3) The emissions calculated under the actual-to-projected actual test stated in 326 

IAC 2-2-2(d)(3).

(4) Any other information that the Permittee deems fit to include in this report, 

Reports required in this part shall be submitted to: 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management 

Air Compliance Section, Office of Air Quality 

100 North Senate Avenue 

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2251 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 33 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(h) The Permittee shall make the information required to be documented and maintained in 

accordance with (c) in Section C.17 available for review upon a request for inspection by 

IDEM, OAQ. The general public may request this information from the IDEM, OAQ under 

326 IAC 17.1. 

Stratospheric Ozone Protection 

C.18 Compliance with 40 CFR 82 and 326 IAC 22-1 

The Permittee shall comply with all the applicable provisions of 40 CFR Part 82, wherever 

applicable to activities at the source. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 34 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION D.1 UTILITIES OPERATION CONDITIONS

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The information describing the processes contained in the following facility description boxes is 

descriptive information and does not constitute enforceable conditions. 

This section will no longer be in effect when all of the coal chutes to Boilers No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3 are 

disconnected, starting September 13, 2007. 

(a) The following emission units are subject to applicable requirements described in this D section: 

Emission* 

Unit ID Emission Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity UOM Control Device 

Building T6: 

 BLR001 Coal/Natural Gas Boiler S-T6-BLR001 92 MMBtu/hr Multiclone001 

 BLR002 Coal/Natural Gas Boiler S-T6-BLR002 92 MMBtu/hr Multiclone002 

 BLR003 Coal/Natural Gas Boiler S-T6-BLR003 92 MMBtu/hr Multiclone003 

 BLR004 Natural Gas/Fuel Oil Boiler S-T6-BLR004 142 MMBtu/hr None 

 BLR005 Natural Gas/Fuel Oil Boiler S-T6-BLR005 97 MMBtu/hr None 

CONASH Ash Handling System PV-T6-

CONASH 1805 lbs/hr Baghouse 

* In this permit, boilers BLR001, BLR002, BLR003, BLR004, and BLR005 are referred to as Boilers 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, 

respectively. 

(b) The following emission units are not subject to applicable requirements described in this D 

section and are listed only for informational purposes: 

Emission 

Unit ID Emission Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal 

Capacity UOM Control 

Device 

Outside Building T6: 

OILTK001* Fuel Oil Storage Tank PV-T6-

OILTK001 250,000 gallons None 

COAL Coal Pile N/A N/A N/A N/A 

CNV001-

CNV005 

Covered Coal Conveyor 

System N/A N/A N/A N/A 

* Emission units marked with a single asterisk are insignificant activities as defined in 326 IAC 2-7-1(21). Specifically, 

the fuel oil storage tank is an insignificant activity pursuant to 326 IAC 2-7-1(21)(A)-(C). 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.1.0 SECTION D.1 Requirements Supersession 

The requirements of this SECTION D.1 shall be superseded by SECTION D.20 and therefore, 

shall no longer be in effect starting September 13, 2007. 

D.1.1 Particulate Matter (PM) Limitations [326 IAC 6-2-3, 326 IAC 6-3, and PC (79) 1510 Issued March 

22, 1982 (Revised by this permit)] 

(a) Pursuant to 326 IAC 6-2-3(b) (Particulate Matter Emission Limitations for Sources of 

Indirect Heating), particulate emissions from each coal/natural gas-fired boiler (Boilers 1, 

2, and 3) shall not exceed 0.56 pounds per million British thermal units (MMBtu) heat 

input. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 35 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(b) Pursuant to 326 IAC 6-2-3(c) (Particulate Matter Emission Limitations for Sources of 

Indirect Heating), particulate emissions from Boiler 4 shall not exceed 0.39 pounds per 

MMBtu heat input. 

(c) Pursuant to 326 IAC 6-2-3(c) (Particulate Matter Emission Limitations for Sources of 

Indirect Heating), particulate emissions from Boiler 5 shall not exceed 0.31 pounds per 

MMBtu heat input. 

(d) Pursuant to 326 IAC 6-3-2, particulate matter emissions from the ash handling system 

shall not exceed 3.83 pounds per hour based on a maximum throughput of 0.902 tons of 

ash per hour. 

 

D.1.2 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Limitations [326 IAC 7-1.1-2, and PC (79) 1510 Issued March 22, 1982 

(Revised by this permit)] 

(a) Pursuant to 326 IAC 7-1.1-2 (Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations), the SO2 emissions 

from each of the coal/natural gas-fired boilers (Boilers 1, 2 and 3) shall not exceed 6.0 

pounds per MMBtu heat input. 

(b) Pursuant to 326 IAC 7-1.1-2 (Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations), the SO2 emissions 

from Boiler 4 shall be limited to 0.5 pounds per MMBtu heat input, when burning No. 2 

fuel oil. Pursuant to 326 IAC 7-2-1, compliance with this standard is based on a calendar 

month average. This emission limit correlates to a maximum fuel oil sulfur content of 0.49 

percent by weight. 

(c) Pursuant to 326 IAC 7-1.1-2 (Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations), the SO2 emissions 

from Boiler 5 shall not exceed 0.5 pounds per MMBtu heat input, when burning No. 2 fuel 

oil. This emission limit correlates to a maximum fuel oil sulfur content of 0.49 percent by 

weight. 

D.1.3 Reserved 

D.1.4 Temporary Alternative Opacity Limitations [326 IAC 5-1-3] 

Pursuant to 326 IAC 5-1-3 (Temporary Alternative Opacity Limitations), the following conditions 

apply as an alternative to the opacity limitations in Section C – Opacity: 

(a) When building a new fire in a boiler, or shutting down a boiler, opacity may exceed the 

applicable limit established in 326 IAC 5-1-2 and stated in Section C - Opacity. However, 

opacity levels shall not exceed sixty percent (60%) for any six (6) minute averaging 

period. Opacity in excess of the applicable limit established in 326 IAC 5-1-2 shall not 

continue for more than two (2) six (6)-minute averaging periods in any twenty-four (24) 

hour period. 

(b) When removing ashes from the fuel bed or furnace in a boiler or blowing tubes, opacity 

may exceed the applicable limit established in 326 IAC 5-1-2 and stated in Section C - 

Opacity. However, opacity levels shall not exceed sixty percent (60%) for any six (6) 

minute averaging period and opacity in excess of the applicable limit shall not continue 

for more than one (1) six (6) minute averaging periods in any sixty (60) minute period. 

The averaging periods shall not be permitted for more than three (3) six (6) minute 

averaging periods in a twelve (12) hour period. 

D.1.5 Preventive Maintenance Plans/Start-up Shutdown, and Malfunction Plans [326 IAC 2-7-5(13)] 

[40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DDDDD] 

(a) Until September 12, 2007 or until startup of new boilers, whichever is first, a Preventive 

Maintenance Plan, in accordance with Section B - Preventive Maintenance Plan, of this 

permit, is required for the coal/natural gas-fired boilers and associated multiclone control 

devices. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 36 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(b) After September 12, 2007 or upon startup of new boilers, whichever is first, a Start-Up 

Shutdown, and Malfunction Plan is required for each boiler as required by 40 CFR 63 

Part DDDDD, and in accordance with Section B – Preventative Maintenance Plan, of this 

permit. 

Additional Emission Limitations and Standards are included in Conditions D.1.17 and D.1.18. 

Testing and Monitoring Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-6(1), (6)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.1.6 Testing Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-6(1), (6)] [40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DDDDD] 

(a) The Permittee shall perform particulate matter performance tests for Boilers 1, 2 and 3 

utilizing Methods 5 or 17 (40 CFR 60, Appendix A) for PM or other methods as approved 

by the Commissioner. These tests shall be repeated every third calendar year from the 

calendar year of the most recently completed compliance stack test. The requirements 

for conducting performance tests are described in Section C – Performance Testing. 

(b) No emissions testing is required for the boilers for compliance with particulate matter for 

boilers 4, and 5, limit established in Conditions D.1.1 at this time. However, IDEM may 

require performance testing when necessary to determine compliance. The requirements 

for conducting performance tests are described in Section C – Performance Testing. 

(c) All performance testing and/or fuel analyses shall be performed as required by 40 CFR 

63 Part DDDDD. 

D.1.7 Coal Sampling and Analysis for SO2 [326 IAC 3-7 and 326 IAC 7-2] 

The Permittee shall collect coal sampling and analysis data on a calendar month average in 

accordance with one of the following methods specified in 326 IAC 3 for each of the coal/natural 

gas-fired boilers (Boilers 1, 2 and 3): 

(a) Coal sampling and analysis shall be performed using one of the following procedures: 

(1) Sampling and analyzing the coal according to the Permittee’s Coal Sampling and 

Assay Plan, submitted pursuant to 326 IAC 3-7-5(a). The following minimum 

sampling and analysis requirements shall be met: 

(A) The coal sample acquisition point shall be at a location where 

representative samples of the total coal flow to be combusted by the 

facility or facilities may be obtained. A single as-bunkered or as-burned 

sampling station may be used to represent the coal to be combusted by 

multiple facilities using the same stockpile feed system; 

(B) Coal shall be sampled at least two (2) times per day and at least one (1) 

time per twelve (12) hour period unless no coal is bunkered during the 

preceding twelve (12) hour period. This permit condition satisfies the 

requirements of 326 IAC 3-7-2(b)(3)(B); 

(C) Minimum sample size shall be five hundred (500) grams; 

(D) Samples shall be composited and analyzed at the end of each calendar 

month; 

(E) Preparation of the coal sample, heat content analysis, and sulfur content 

analysis shall be determined pursuant to 326 IAC 3-7-2(c), (d), (e); or 

(2) Sample and analyze the coal pursuant to 326 IAC 3-7-2(b). 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 37 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(b) Upon written notification to IDEM by a facility owner or operator, continuous emission 

monitoring data collected and reported pursuant to 326 IAC 3-5-1 may be used as the 

means for determining compliance with the emission limitations in 326 IAC 7-1.1-2. Upon 

such notification, the other requirements of 326 IAC 7-2 shall not apply. [326 IAC 7-2-

1(g)] 

D.1.8 Fuel Oil Sampling and Analysis for SO2 [326 IAC 7-2] 

The Permittee shall utilize one of the following methods for Boilers 4 and 5 when burning fuel oil: 

(a) Provide vendor analysis of quantity, heat content and sulfur content of fuel delivered, if 

accompanied by a certification; 

(b) Analyze the oil sample to determine the sulfur content of the oil via the procedures in 326 

IAC 3-7-4. 

(1) Oil samples may be collected from the fuel tank immediately after the fuel tank is 

filled and before any oil is combusted; and 

(2) If a partially empty fuel tank is refilled, a new sample and analysis would be 

required upon filling; or 

(c) Conduct a stack test for sulfur dioxide emissions from the boiler, using 40 CFR 60, 

Appendix A, Method 6 in accordance with the procedures in 326 IAC 3-6, which is 

conducted with such frequency as to generate the amount of information required by (a) 

or (b) above. [326 IAC 7-2-1(d)] 

D.1.9 Reserved 

D.1.10 Alternative Operating Scenarios 

(a) The Permittee may elect to perform the tests in D.1.6(a) while burning a mixture of 

natural gas and coal (co-fire). The Permittee shall inform IDEM in writing whenever the 

Co-Fire operating scenario is used, in which case the following monitoring requirements 

and limits apply. 

(1) The Permittee shall install and operate a gas flow meter and a steam flow rate 

flowmeter on each boiler where the co-fire option is used. A Preventative 

Maintenance Plan, in accordance with Section B – Preventative Maintenance 

Plan, is required for the monitors. 

(2) The 24-hour daily average gas ratio (R) shall be greater than or equal to the 

value determined in the most recent performance test. The gas ratio shall be 

calculated by: 

R = Average (N1/S1+ N2/S2+ ... + Ni

/Si) 

Where Ni

 = natural gas flow rate, in acfm, for each 15 minute period 

Si

 = steam flow rate from boiler, in lb/hr, for each 15 minute period 

(3) If the 24-hour daily gas ratio falls below the gas ratio established pursuant to the 

performance test, or if the gas-burners fail to operate in a normal manner, the 

permittee shall take reasonable response steps in accordance with Section C - 

Compliance Response Plan - Preparation, Implementation, Records, and 

Reports. Failure to take response steps in accordance with Section C - 

Compliance Response Plan - Preparation, Implementation, Records, and 

Reports, shall be considered a deviation from this permit. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 38 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(b) If the Permittee has conducted a performance test under co-fired conditions to establish a 

minimum gas ratio, but subsequently wants to operate a boiler without natural gas cofired or at a gas ratio that is lower than the ratio established at the performance test, then 

the Permittee must demonstrate that particulate matter emissions are less than the 

emission limits in D.1.1(a) pursuant to a performance test as described in D.1.6(a) under 

the desired operating conditions. The Permittee may not begin to operate under the new 

conditions until the performance test results are submitted to IDEM, OAQ. 

D.1.11 Visible Emission Notations 

(a) Visible emission notations of the stack exhausts of Boilers 1, 2 and 3 shall be performed 

once per day during normal daylight operations. A trained employee shall record whether 

emissions are normal or abnormal. 

(b) For processes operated continuously, “normal” means those conditions prevailing, or 

expected to prevail, eighty percent (80%) of the time the process is in operation, not 

counting startup or shutdown time. 

(c) In the case of batch or discontinuous operations, readings shall be taken during that part 

of the operation that would normally be expected to cause the greatest emissions. 

(d) A trained employee is an employee who has worked at the plant at least one (1) month 

and has been trained in the appearance and characteristics of normal visible emissions 

for that specific process. 

(e) The Compliance Response Plan for the boilers shall contain troubleshooting contingency 

and response steps for when an abnormal emission is observed. 

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-19] 

D.1.12 Coal Characteristics and Consumption Records 

The Permittee shall record the information described in items (a) through (d) below on a calendar 

month basis for Boilers 1, 2, and 3. 

(a) The amount (expressed in tons) of coal burned; 

(b) The average sulfur content (expressed in percentage) of coal burned; 

(c) The average heat content (expressed in Btu per pound) of the coal burned; and 

(d) The average sulfur dioxide emission rate (expressed in pounds per MMBtu). 

D.1.13 Fuel Oil Characteristics and Consumption Records 

The Permittee shall record the information described in item (a) through (d) below on a calendar 

month basis for Boiler 4, and Boiler 5: 

(a) The amount (expressed in thousands of gallons (Mgal)) of No. 2 fuel oil burned in Boilers 

4 and 5; 

(b) The average sulfur content (expressed in percentage by weight) of the No. 2 fuel oil 

burned in Boilers 4 and 5; 

(c) The average higher heating value (expressed in Btu per gallon) of the No. 2 fuel oil 

burned in Boilers 4 and 5; and 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 39 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(d) The average sulfur dioxide emission rate (expressed in pounds per MMBtu) of the No. 2 

fuel oil for Boilers 4 and 5. 

D.1.14 Reserved 

D.1.15 Standard Operating Procedures 

Pursuant to 326 IAC 3-7-5(a), the Permittee shall maintain and implement a standard operating 

procedure (SOP) for coal sampling, handling, analysis, quality control, quality assurance, and 

data reporting of the information collected pursuant to 326 IAC 3-7-2. In addition, any revision to 

the SOP shall be submitted to IDEM, OAQ. 

D.1.16 Visible Emissions Notations 

The Permittee shall record the visible emissions notations of the coal/natural gas-fired boilers 

stack exhaust in accordance with Condition D.1.11. 

D.1.17 Record Keeping Requirements 

(a) Records and data required by D.1.10 shall be maintained for boilers operating under the 

co-fire scenario. This condition shall be in effect until September 12, 2007, when coal will 

no longer be used for fuel. 

(b) After September 12, 2007 or upon startup on new boilers, whichever is first, the 

applicable record keeping requirements of 40 CFR 63 Part DDDDD shall apply. 

D.1.18 Reporting Requirements 

(a) The Permittee shall submit quarterly summary reports of the monthly coal characteristic 

and consumption records required by Condition D.1.12 for Boilers 1, 2 and 3. This 

condition shall be in effect until September 12, 2007, when coal will no longer be used for 

fuel. 

(b) The Permittee shall submit quarterly summary reports of the monthly fuel oil 

characteristic and consumption records required by Condition D.1.13 for Boilers 4 and 5. 

(c) Reserved 

(d) All reports shall be submitted to the address listed in Section C – General Reporting 

Requirements, of this permit, using the reporting form located at the end of this permit, or 

its equivalent, within thirty (30) days after the end of the quarter being reported. The 

report does require the certification by the “responsible official” as defined by 326 IAC 2-

7-1(34). 

Additional Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements are included in Conditions D.1.22 and D.1.23. 

Modifications and Construction Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-10.5, 326 IAC 2-7-12 and 326 IAC 2-2] 

D.1.19 Modifications and Construction: Advance Approval of Permit Conditions Requirements 

The emission units described in this D section are not subject to the advance approval permit 

conditions. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 40 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.1.20 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Industrial, Commercial, and 

Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters [40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DDDDD] 

After September 12, 2007 or upon startup of new boilers, whichever is first, the Permittee shall 

comply with the emission limitations and standards of 40 CFR 63, Subpart DDDDD. 

D.1.21 General Provisions Relating to NESHAP [326 IAC 20-1][40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A] [40 CFR 

Part 63, Subpart DDDDD] 

(a) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.7565, the provisions of 40 CFR 63 Subpart A - General 

Provisions, which are incorporated as 326 IAC 20-1-1, apply to the affected source for 

the large solid fuel subcategory (Boilers 1, 2, and 3) and the affected source large 

gaseous fuel subcategory (Boilers 4 and 5), except when otherwise specified in 40 CFR 

63 Subpart DDDDD. The Permittee must comply with 40 CFR 63 Subpart A as stated in 

40 CFR 63.7565. 

(b) Since the applicable requirements associated with the compliance options for the 

affected sources are not included and specifically identified in this permit, the permit 

shield authorized by the B section of this permit in the condition titled Permit Shield, and 

set out in 326 IAC 2-7-15 does not apply to paragraph (a) of this condition, except as 

otherwise provided in this condition. 

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-19] 

D.1.22 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Industrial, Commercial, and 

Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters - Notification Requirements 

[40 CFR 63, Subpart DDDDD] 

(a) After September 12, 2007 or upon startup of new boilers, whichever is first, the applicable 

notification and reporting requirements of 40 CFR 63 Part DDDDD shall apply. 

(b) All notifications and reports shall be submitted to the address listed in Section C – 

General Reporting Requirements, of this permit. The notifications do require the 

certification by the “responsible official” as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

D.1.23 Requirement to Submit a Significant Permit Modification Application [326 IAC 2-7-12] 

[326 IAC 2-7-5] [40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DDDDD] 

The Permittee shall submit an application for a significant permit modification to IDEM, OAQ to 

include information regarding which compliance option or options will be chosen in the Part 70 

permit for the affected source for the large solid fuel subcategory (Boilers 1, 2, and 3). 

(a) The significant permit modification application shall be consistent with 326 IAC 2-7-12, 

including information sufficient for IDEM, OAQ to incorporate into the Part 70 permit the 

applicable requirements of 40 CFR 63, Subpart DDDDD, a description of the affected 

source and activities subject to the standard, and a description of how the Permittee will 

meet the applicable requirements of the standard. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 41 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(b) The significant permit modification application shall be submitted no later than nine 

months prior to September 12, 2007. 

(c) The significant permit modification application shall be submitted to: 

Indiana Department of Environmental Management 

Permits Branch, Office of Air Quality 

100 North Senate Avenue 

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2251 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 42 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION D.2 UTILITIES SUPPORT OPERATION CONDITIONS 

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The information describing the processes contained in the following facility description boxes is 

descriptive information and does not constitute enforceable conditions: 

(a) The following emissions units are is subject to applicable requirements described in this D 

section: 

Emission 

Unit ID 

Emission Unit 

Description Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity UOM Control Device 

Building T6: 

T121 Diesel Generator N/A 1250 KW None 

(b) The following emission units are not subject to applicable requirements described in this D 

section and are listed only for informational purposes: 

Emission 

Unit ID 

Emission Unit 

Description Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity UOM Control Device 

Building T5: 

T5* Diesel Generator N/A 380 HP None 

Portable Units: 

T62* Diesel Generator N/A 1100 KW None 

T135* Diesel Generator N/A 390 HP None 

T78* Diesel Compressor N/A 58 KW None 

T89-1* Diesel Compressor N/A 58 KW None 

T89-2* Diesel Compressor N/A 58 KW None 

Building T97/T98: 

T97/T98* Glycol System N/A 45,000 gallon None 

Building T9/T23: 

T9/T23* Lime Storage Silo N/A 79.5 lb/hr None 

Building T70: 

Gen-7001* Diesel Generator N/A 300 KW None 

* Emission units marked with a single asterisk are insignificant activities as defined in 326 IAC 2-7-1(21). 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.2.1 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) Emission Limitations [326 IAC 2-2 and CP 157-3319 Issued February 21, 

1995] 

Generator T121 shall not exceed 900 hours of operation per 12 consecutive month period rolled 

on a monthly basis. This operational limitation limits NOx emissions to less than 40 tons per 

year; therefore, the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) rules pursuant to 326 IAC 2-2 

does not apply. 

D.2.2 Preventive Maintenance Plan [326 IAC 2-7-5(13)] 

A Preventive Maintenance Plan, in accordance with Section B - Preventive Maintenance Plan, of 

this permit, is not required for the facility described in this Section. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 43 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Testing and Monitoring Requirements 

D.2.3 Testing Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-6(1), (6)] [326 IAC 2-7-6(1)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

No emissions testing is required for the emission units described in this Section, at this time, but 

IDEM may require compliance testing at any specific time when necessary to determine if the 

facility is in compliance. The requirements for conducting performance tests that may be required 

by IDEM in the future are described in Section C – Performance Testing. 

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-19] 

D.2.4 Generator Hours of Operation 

The Permittee shall record the actual hours of operation for Generator T121. The records shall 

report the actual hours of operation per 12-month period, rolled on a monthly basis using the 

reporting form located at the end of this permit, or equivalent. 

D.2.5 Reporting Requirements 

A quarterly report of the information specified in Condition D.2.4 shall be submitted to the address 

listed in Section C - General Reporting Requirements, within thirty (30) days after the end of the 

quarter being reported. This report submitted by the Permittee requires the certification by the 

“responsible official” as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

Modifications and Construction Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-10.5, 326 IAC 2-7-12 and 326 IAC 2-2] 

D.2.6 Modifications and Construction: Advance Approval of Permit Conditions Requirements 

The emission units described in this D section are not subject to the advance approval permit 

conditions. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 44 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION D.3 FERMENTATION OPERATION CONDITIONS 

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The information describing the processes contained in the following facility description boxes is 

descriptive information and does not constitute enforceable conditions: 

(a) The following emissions units are subject to applicable requirements described in this D section: 

Emission 

Unit ID Emission Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity UOM Control Device 

Building T1 – Raw Material Prep Area: 

MIX001* Dry Raw Material Mixer PV-T1-T52348 N/A N/A 

MIX002* Dry Raw Material Mixer PV-T1-T52348 N/A N/A 

MCNV001 Conveyor of Raw Material Mixers PV-T1-T52348 N/A N/A 

Dust Collector 

T52348** 

Building T2 – Fermentation Production Area: 

TK001* Bump Tank S-T2-FERM 5000 liters None 

TK002* Bump Tank S-T2-FERM 5000 liters None 

TK003* Bump Tank S-T2-FERM 5000 liters None 

TK004* Bump Tank S-T2-FERM 5000 liters None 

TK011* Bump Tank S-T2-FERM 5000 liters None 

TK012* Bump Tank S-T2-FERM 5000 liters None 

TK013* Bump Tank S-T2-FERM 5000 liters None 

TK014* Bump Tank S-T2-FERM 5000 liters None 

TK005* Fermentor Tank S-T2-FERM 60000 liters 

TK006* Fermentor Tank S-T2-FERM 60000 liters 

TK007* Fermentor Tank S-T2-FERM 60000 liters 

Cyclone 

T67457** 

TK008* Fermentor Tank S-T2-FERM 60000 liters 

TK009* Fermentor Tank S-T2-FERM 60000 liters 

TK010* Fermentor Tank S-T2-FERM 60000 liters 

Cyclone 

T67458** 

TK015* Fermentor Tank S-T2-FERM 60000 liters Cyclone 

T67462** 

TK016* Fermentor Tank S-T2-FERM 60000 liters Cyclone 

T67463** 

TK017* Fermentor Tank S-T2-FERM 60000 liters Cyclone 

T67464** 

TK018* Fermentor Tank S-T2-FERM 60000 liters Cyclone 

T65689** 

TK019* Fermentor Tank S-T2-FERM 60000 liters Cyclone 

T52221** 

TK020* Fermentor Tank S-T2-FERM 60000 liters Cyclone 

T52228** 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 45 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Emission 

Unit ID Emission Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal 

Capacity UOM Control 

Device 

Building T2A – Fermentation Production Area: 

TK021* Bump Tank S-T2-FERM 10000 liters None 

TK022* Bump Tank S-T2-FERM 10000 liters None 

TK023* Bump Tank S-T2-FERM 10000 liters None 

TK024* Bump Tank S-T2-FERM 10000 liters None 

TK025* Fermentor Tank S-T2-FERM 120000 liters 

TK026* Fermentor Tank S-T2-FERM 120000 liters 

TK027* Fermentor Tank S-T2-FERM 120000 liters 

Cyclone 

T67459** 

TK028* Fermentor Tank S-T2-FERM 120000 liters Cyclone 

T67696** 

TK029* Fermentor Tank S-T2-FERM 120000 liters Cyclone 

T67697** 

TK030* Fermentor Tank S-T2-FERM 120000 liters Cyclone 

T67698** 

Building T2C – Fermentation Production Area: 

TK043* Bump Tank S-T2-FERM 37625 liters Cyclone 

T65363** 

TK044* Bump Tank S-T2-FERM 37625 liters Cyclone 

T65364** 

TK048* Fermentor Tank S-T2-FERM 254000 liters Cyclone 

T65367** 

TK049* Fermentor Tank S-T2-FERM 254000 liters Cyclone 

T65359** 

TK050* Fermentor Tank S-T2-FERM 254000 liters Cyclone 

T65360** 

* Emissions units marked with a single asterisk are insignificant activities as defined in 326 IAC 2-7-1(21)(A)-(C). 

** All control devices are voluntary units and are not required to demonstrate compliance with any applicable regulations. 

(b) The following emissions units are insignificant activities pursuant to 326 IAC 2-7-1(21)(A)-(C) and 

are not subject to applicable requirements described in this D section: 

Emission Unit 

ID Emission Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal 

Capacity UOM Control 

Device 

Building T46 – Material Storage Area: 

BIN001 Dry Raw Material Storage Bin PV-T46-T67454 23000 liters 

BIN002 Dry Raw Material Storage Bin PV-T46-T67454 23000 liters 

BIN003 Dry Raw Material Storage Bin PV-T46-T67454 23000 liters 

BIN004 Dry Raw Material Storage Bin PV-T46-T67454 23000 liters 

Baghouse 

T67454** 

BIN005 Dry Raw Material Storage Bin PV-T46-T67455 23000 liters 

BIN006 Dry Raw Material Storage Bin PV-T46-T67455 23000 liters 

BIN007 Dry Raw Material Storage Bin PV-T46-T67455 23000 liters 

Baghouse 

T67455** 

BIN008 Dry Raw Material Storage Bin PV-T46-T67455 23000 liters 

 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 46 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Emission Unit 

ID Emission Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal 

Capacity UOM Control 

Device 

BIN009 Dry Raw Material Storage Bin PV-T46-T67659 23000 liters 

BIN010 Dry Raw Material Storage Bin PV-T46-T67659 23000 liters 

Baghouse 

T67659** 

BIN011 Dry Raw Material Storage Bin PV-T46-T67456 23000 liters 

BIN012 Dry Raw Material Storage Bin PV-T46-T67456 23000 liters 

Baghouse 

T67456** 

Building T1 – Raw Material Prep Area: 

BLO001 Railcar Pneumatic Conveyor N/A N/A liters None 

DISP001 Automated Dispensing Station PV-T1-T44984 N/A liters 

DISSC001 Dispensing Scale PV-T1-T44984 N/A liters 

Dust Collector 

T44984** 

TK121 Make Up Tank PV-T1-314512 10150 liters 

TK122 Make Up Tank PV-T1-314512 10150 liters 

TK123 Make Up Tank PV-T1-314512 2100 liters 

Rotoclone 

314512** 

TK123A Make Up Area Tank N/A 380 liters None 

TK124 Make Up Tank PV-T1-314512 2100 liters Rotoclone 

314512** 

TSLU Slurry Tank N/A 3600 liters None 

TK125 Make Up Tank PV-T1-T67489 24600 liters Rotoclone 

T67489** 

TK126 Make Up Tank PV-T1-T67492 24600 liters Rotoclone 

T67492** 

SC001 Liquid Weigh Scale Tank N/A N/A liters None 

Building T1 – Liquid Storage Area: 

TK231 Liquid Storage Tank N/A 20000 liters None 

TK232 Whole Broth Storage Tank N/A 200000 liters None 

TK233 Whole Broth Storage Tank N/A 200000 liters None 

TK234 Whole Broth Storage Tank N/A 200000 liters None 

TK235 Whole Broth Storage Tank N/A 200000 liters None 

TK236 Waste Holding Tank N/A 200000 liters None 

TK237 Liquid Storage Tank N/A 200000 liters None 

TK241 Liquid Storage Tank N/A 100000 liters None 

TK242 Liquid Storage Tank N/A 100000 liters None 

TK243 Liquid Storage Tank N/A 100000 liters None 

TK244 Liquid Storage Tank N/A 100000 liters None 

TK245 Liquid Storage Tank N/A 100000 liters None 

TK246 Liquid Storage Tank N/A 100000 liters None 

TK247 Liquid Storage Tank N/A 100000 liters None 

TK248 Liquid Storage Tank N/A 30400 liters None 

TK249 Liquid Storage Tank N/A 45300 liters None 

Building T1 – Filter Room: 

TK813 Lime Tank PV-T1-316488 8600 liters Rotoclone 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 47 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Emission Unit 

ID Emission Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal 

Capacity UOM Control 

Device 

TK814 Filter Room Tank (Tank 8.5) PV-T1-316488 9600 liters 316488** 

TK143 Slurry Tank N/A 3800 liters None 

TK144 Slurry Tank N/A 3800 liters None 

Building T63 – Product Storage Area: 

TK255 Whole Broth Tank N/A 94700 liters None 

** All control devices are voluntary units and are not required to demonstrate compliance with any applicable 

regulations. 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.3.1 Non-Applicability Determination of Pharmaceutical MACT Standards [40 CFR 63, Subpart GGG] 

The emission units associated with the fermentation operations are not subject to the 

requirements of 40 CFR 63, Subpart GGG (Pharmaceutical MACT Standards) because these 

emission units do not process, use, or produce hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions in 

excess of 50 ppmv pursuant to 40 CFR 63.1251 (Process Vent Definition). 

D.3.2 Non-Applicability Determination of State VOC Emission Standards [326 IAC 8-5-3, 326 IAC 8-1-

6] 

(a) The emission units associated with the fermentation operations do not manufacture 

pharmaceutical products by chemical synthesis. Therefore, the emission units 

associated with the fermentation operations are not subject to the requirements of 326 

IAC 8-5-3 (VOC Emission Limitations for Synthesized Pharmaceutical Manufacturing 

Operations). 

(b) The emission units associated with the fermentation operations are not subject to the 

requirements of 326 IAC 8-1-6 (Best Available Control Technologies for VOC Emissions) 

because the VOC emissions associated with each emission unit or emission project are 

less than 25 tons per year. 

D.3.3 Particulate Matter (PM) Emission Limitations [326 IAC 6-3-2]

Pursuant to 326 IAC 6-3-2, Registration 157-3220 Issued September 3, 1993, Registration 157-

4466 Issued May 8, 1995, and Registration 157-7144 Issued December 4, 1996, the emission 

units presented in the table below shall not exceed the following particulate matter emission rates 

based on the following maximum throughput rates: 

Emission Unit Description Emission Unit ID 

Maximum Process 

Weight Rate 

(ton/hr) 

Allowable PM 

Emission Rate 

(lb/hr) 

Building T1 – Raw Material Prep Area: 

Dry Raw Material Mixers + 

Conveyor for Mixers 

MIX001, MIX002, 

MCNV001 0.881 3.77, combined 

Building T2 – Fermentation Production Area: 

Bump Tanks TK001 – TK004 

Fermentor Tanks TK005 – TK010 

Bump Tanks TK011 – TK014 

Fermentor Tanks TK015 – TK020 

18.3 28.7, combined 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 48 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Emission Unit Description Emission Unit ID 

Maximum Process 

Weight Rate 

(ton/hr) 

Allowable PM 

Emission Rate 

(lb/hr) 

Building T2A – Fermentation Production Area: 

Bump Tanks TK021 – TK024 

Fermentor Tanks TK025 – TK027, 

TK029 – TK030 

Fermentor Tank TK028 

18.3 28.7, combined 

Building 2C – Fermentation Production Area: 

Bump Tanks TK043 – TK044 

Fermentor Tanks TK048 – TK050 31.6 5.5, combined 

D.3.4 Preventive Maintenance Plan [326 IAC 2-7-5(13)] 

A Preventive Maintenance Plan, in accordance with Section B - Preventive Maintenance Plan, of 

this permit, is not required for any of the emission units or control devices described in this 

Section. 

Testing and Monitoring Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-6(1) (6)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.3.5 Testing Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-6(1), (6)] 

No emissions testing is required for the emission units described in this Section at this time, but 

IDEM may require compliance testing at any specific time when necessary to determine if the 

facility is in compliance. The requirements for conducting performance tests that may be required 

by IDEM in the future are described in Section C – Performance Testing. 

Modifications and Construction Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-10.5, 326 IAC 2-7-12 and 326 IAC 2-2] 

D.3.6 Modifications and Construction: Advance Approval of Permit Conditions Requirements 

The emission units described in this D section are not subject to the advance approval permit 

conditions. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 49 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION D.4 FERMENTED PRODUCTS - PURIFICATION OPERATION CONDITIONS

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The information describing the processes contained in the following facility description boxes is 

descriptive information and does not constitute enforceable conditions: 

(a) The following emissions units are subject to applicable requirements described in this D section: 

Emission 

Unit ID Emission Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity UOM Control Device 

Building T3 – Purification Production Area: 

T3-RVD040 Rotary Vacuum Dryer Vent 500 gallons Dust Collector** 

Building T147 – Storage Tank Module: 

T147-TK001 Storage Tank Vent 19000 gallons Vent Condenser**

T147-TK002 Storage Tank Vent 19000 gallons Vent Condenser**

T147-TK003 Storage Tank Vent 19000 gallons Vent Condenser**

T147-TK004 Storage Tank Vent 19000 gallons Vent Condenser**

T147-TK005 Storage Tank Vent 19000 gallons Vent Condenser**

T147-TK006 Storage Tank Vent 19000 gallons Vent Condenser**

T147-TK007 Storage Tank Vent 19000 gallons Vent Condenser**

T147-TK008 Storage Tank Vent 19000 gallons Vent Condenser**

T147-TK009 Storage Tank Vent 19000 gallons Vent Condenser**

T147-TK010 Storage Tank Vent 19000 gallons Vent Condenser**

T147-TK011 Storage Tank Vent 19000 gallons Vent Condenser**

T147-TK012 Storage Tank Vent 19000 gallons Vent Condenser**

** All control devices are voluntary units and are not required to demonstrate compliance with any applicable regulations. 

(b) The following emission units are not subject to applicable requirements described in this D 

section: 

Emission 

Unit ID Emission Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal 

Capacity UOM Control 

Device 

Building T3 – Purification Production Area: 

T3-TK47718* Azo Receiver Tank Vent 1000 gallons None 

T3-TK56* Vent Condensate Tank Vent 30 gallons None 

T3-CENT001* Stacked Plate Centrifuge Vent 20 gallons None 

T3-CENT002* Stacked Plate Centrifuge Vent 20 gallons None 

T3-CENT003* Stacked Plate Centrifuge Vent 20 gallons None 

T3-CENT004* Stacked Plate Centrifuge Vent 20 gallons None 

T3-COL001* East Carbon Column Vent 200 gallons None 

T3-TK261* Process Tank Vent 500 gallons None 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 50 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Emission 

Unit ID Emission Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal 

Capacity UOM Control 

Device 

T3-TK327-1T* Process Tank Vent 500 gallons None 

T3-TK330* Process Tank Vent 4000 gallons None 

T3-TK332-3T* Process Tank Vent 3000 gallons None 

T3-TK337-1T* Process Tank - Acid tank Vent 500 gallons None 

T3-TK338-1T* Process Tank Vent 500 gallons None 

T3-TK338-2T* Process Tank Vent 500 gallons None 

T3-TK341-1T* Process Tank Vent 500 gallons None 

T3-TK346-1T* Amyl Acetate Tank Vent 500 gallons None 

T3-TK353-1T* Receive Amyl Acetate from 

EVAP305 Vent 1000 gallons None 

T3-TK355-1T* Process Tank Vent 1000 gallons None 

T3-TK357-1T* Process Tank Vent 1000 gallons None 

T3-TK376-1T* Process Tank Vent 2000 gallons None 

T3-TK376-2T* Process Tank Vent 2000 gallons None 

T3-TK376-3T* Process Tank Vent 2000 gallons None 

T3-TK378-1T* Process Tank Vent 500 gallons None 

T3-TK394* Chemical Waste Tank Vent 2000 gallons None 

T3-TK397-1T* Spent Aqueous Tank Vent 2000 gallons None 

T3-TK399* Acid Wash Tank Vent 500 gallons None 

T3-EVAP300* Swenson Evaporator Vent 400 gallons None 

T3-EVAP305 Evaporator Vent 800 gallons None 

T3-COL002* West Carbon Column Vent 200 gallons None 

Building T40 – Purification Production Area: 

T40-TK050* Holding Tank Vent 750 gallons None 

T40-TK051* Tank Vent 2000 gallons None 

T40-TK052* Tank Vent 2000 gallons None 

T40-TK053* Holding Tank Vent 2000 gallons None 

T40-TK055 Tank Vent 500 gallons None 

T40-TK060* Still Vent 2000 gallons None 

Building T4 – Solvent Recovery: 

T4-COL001 Distilling Column Vent 269 cf None 

T4-TK001* Process Tank Vent 1985 gallons None 

T4* Tylosin System Vent N/A N/A None 

T4-TK101* Process Tank Condenser 25000 gallons Vent Condenser**

Building T39 – Product Storage: 

T39-TK021* Storage Tank Vent 2000 gallons None 

T39-TK022* Storage Tank Vent 2000 gallons None 

T39-TK023* Storage Tank Vent 2000 gallons None 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 51 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Emission 

Unit ID Emission Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal 

Capacity UOM Control 

Device 

T39-TK030* Storage Tank Vent 5000 gallons None 

T39-TK031* Storage Tank Vent 5000 gallons None 

T39-TK036* Storage Tank Vent 5000 gallons None 

Outside Storage Tanks: 

TK420-1T* Hydrochloric Acid Tank 12000 gallons Acid Scrubber** 

TK434-1T* Sulfuric Acid Tank 

Scrubber Vent

15000 gallons None 

* Emission units marked with an asterisk are insignificant activities as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(21)(A)-(C). 

** Control devices marked with a double asterisk are voluntary control units and are not required to demonstrate 

compliance with any regulations. 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.4.1 Non-Applicability Determination of Pharmaceutical MACT Standards [40 CFR 63, Subpart GGG] 

Except for the T3 rotary vacuum dryer, the emission units associated with the purification 

operations are not subject to the requirements of 40 CFR 63, Subpart GGG (Pharmaceutical 

MACT Standards) because these emission units do not process, use, or produce hazardous air 

pollutant (HAP) emissions in excess of 50 ppmv pursuant to 40 CFR 63.1251 (Process Vent 

Definition). 

D.4.2 Non-Applicability Determination of State VOC Emission Standards [326 IAC 8-5-3, Registration 

Issued November 8, 1990, and Amendment Issued November 10, 1992] 

(a) Except for the T3 rotary vacuum dryer, the emission units associated with the purification 

operations do not manufacture pharmaceutical products by chemical synthesis. 

Therefore, except for the T3 rotary vacuum dryer, these emission units are not subject to 

the requirements of 326 IAC 8-5-3 (VOC Emission Limitations for Synthesized 

Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Operations). 

(b) The T3 rotary vacuum dryer does not dry pharmaceutical products by chemical synthesis 

with a potential to emit equal to or greater than 15 pounds per day. Therefore, this dryer 

is not subject to the requirements of 326 IAC 8-5-3. 

D.4.3 T3 Rotary Vacuum Dryer Process Vent Standard [40 CFR 63.1254(A)(2)] 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 63 Subpart GGG (Pharmaceutical MACT Standard), undiluted and 

uncontrolled process vent streams equal to or greater than 50 ppmv HAP from the T3 rotary 

vacuum dryer shall be limited to an annual mass limit of 900 kilograms (kg) per 365-day period to 

comply with the individual process-based mass limit standards under 40 CFR 63.1254(a)(2)(i). 

The sum of process vent emissions from all uncontrolled processes generated during the 

manufacturing of pharmaceutical products shall not exceed an annual mass limit of 1800 kg HAP 

per 365-day period pursuant to 40 CFR 63.1254(a)(2)(ii). 

D.4.4 Preventive Maintenance Plan [326 IAC 2-7-5(13)] 

A Preventive Maintenance Plan, in accordance with Section B - Preventive Maintenance Plan, of 

this permit, is not required for any of the facilities or control devices described in this Section. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 52 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Testing and Monitoring Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-6(1) (6)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.4.5 Testing Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-6(1), (6)] 

N o emissions testing is required for the emission units described in this Section at this time, but 

IDEM may require compliance testing at any specific time when necessary to determine if the 

facility is in compliance. The requirements for conducting performance tests that may be required 

by IDEM in the future are described in Section C – Performance Testing. 

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-19] 

D.4.6 Record Keeping Requirements [40 CFR 63.1254(a)(2), 40 CFR 60.116b(b), Registration Issued 

November 8, 1990, and Amendment Issued November 10, 1992] 

(a) The Permittee shall maintain the following records of the T3 rotary vacuum dryer: 

(1) Daily rolling annual total HAP emissions from process vent streams equal to or 

greater than 50 ppmv from the T3 rotary vacuum dryer; 

(2) Number of batches per year for each batch process; 

(3) Standard batch uncontrolled and controlled emissions for each process; 

(4) Actual uncontrolled and controlled emissions for each nonstandard batch,; and 

(5) Record whether each batch operated was considered a standard batch. 

(b) Pursuant to 40 CFR 60.116b(b) [New Source Performance Standard for Solvent Storage 

Tanks], the Permittee shall maintain records of the dimensions and capacity of each 

storage tank associated with the T147 tank module for the life of the source. 

Modifications and Construction Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-10.5, 326 IAC 2-7-12 and 326 IAC 2-2] 

D.4.7 Modifications and Construction: Advance Approval of Permit Conditions Requirements 

The emission units described in this D section are not subject to the advance approval permit 

conditions. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 53 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION D.5 FERMENTED PRODUCTS – SUPPORT OPERATION CONDITIONS

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The information describing the processes contained in the following facility description boxes is 

descriptive information and does not constitute enforceable conditions: 

(a) The following emissions units are subject to applicable requirements described in this D section: 

Emission 

Unit ID 

Emission Unit 

Description Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity UOM Control Device 

Fermented Products Wastewater Sludge Management Operations: 

T110-TKA Bio-solids Storage Tank T110 300,000 gallons T110 Iron 

Sponge Reactor

T110-TKB Bio-solids Storage Tank T110 300,000 gallons T110 Iron 

Sponge Reactor

T110-TKC Bio-solids Storage Tank T110 300,000 gallons T110 Iron 

Sponge Reactor

T110-TKD Bio-solids Storage Tank T110 300,000 gallons T110 Iron 

Sponge Reactor

(b) The following emission units are not subject to applicable requirements described in this D 

section: 

Emission 

Unit ID 

Emission Unit 

Description Stack/Vent Nominal 

Capacity UOM Control 

Device 

Fermented Products Wastewater Treatment (100 Series Tanks): 

T174* Thermal Research 

Incinerator T174 17 MMBtu/hr N/A 

T10-TK101 Aeration Tank* T174 110,000 gallons None 

T10-TK102 Aeration Tank* T174 123,000 gallons None 

T10-TK103 Aeration Tank* T174 123,000 gallons None 

T10-TK104 Aeration Tank* T174 123,000 gallons None 

T10-TK120 Aeration Tank T174 270,000 gallons 

T10-TK121 Clarifier* T174 122,000 gallons 

T10-TK122 Clarifier* T174 122,000 gallons 

T10-TK123 Lift Station* T174 27,000 gallons 

T174** 

Incinerator 

T10-TK124 Nitrification Tank* Atmosphere 1,700,000 gallons None 

T10-TK125 Nitrification Tank* Atmosphere 1,700,000 gallons None 

T10-TK126 Nitrification Tank* Atmosphere 1,700,000 gallons None 

T10-TK127 Nitrification Clarifier* Atmosphere 90,000 gallons None 

T10-TK128 Nitrification Clarifier* Atmosphere 90,000 gallons None 

T10-TK132 Final Clarifier* Atmosphere 155,000 gallons None 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 54 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Emission 

Unit ID 

Emission Unit 

Description Stack/Vent Nominal 

Capacity UOM Control 

Device 

T10-TK142 Final Clarifier* Atmosphere 155,000 gallons None 

T79-TK401 Wastewater Tank Atmosphere 21,588 gallons None 

T79-TK402 Wastewater Tank Atmosphere 21,588 gallons None 

Fermented Products Wastewater Sludge Management Operations: 

T42 Centrifuge* T174 300 gal/min 

T42-A Sludge Centrifuge* T174 100 gal/min 

T42-B Sludge Centrifuge* T174 150 gal/min 

T174 

Incinerator** 

* Emission units marked with an asterisk are insignificant activities as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(21)(A)-(C). 

** Control devices marked with a double asterisk are voluntary units and are not required to demonstrate compliance 

with any applicable regulations. 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.5.1 Non-Applicability Determination of Pharmaceutical MACT Standards [40 CFR 63, Subpart GGG] 

The fermented products support operations are not subject to the requirements of 40 CFR 63, 

Subpart GGG (Pharmaceutical MACT Standards) because: 

(a) The emission units associated with the fermented products wastewater sludge 

management operations do not process, use, or produce hazardous air pollutant (HAP) 

emissions in excess of 50 ppmv pursuant to 40 CFR 63.1251 (Process Vent Definition); 

and 

(b) The wastewater associated with the fermented products wastewater treatment plant do 

not contain HAP emissions in excess of 5 ppmw pursuant to 40 CFR 63.1251 

(Wastewater Stream Definition). 

D.5.2 Non-Applicability Determination of State VOC Emission Standards [326 IAC 8-5-3] 

The emission units associated with the fermented products support operations do not 

manufacture pharmaceutical products by chemical synthesis. Therefore, these emission units 

are not subject to the requirements of 326 IAC 8-5-3 (VOC Emission Limitations for Synthesized 

Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Operations). 

D.5.3 Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-2, CP 157-4363 Issued August 28, 1996, and 

Amendment 157-8953 Issued November 12, 1997 (Revised by this permit)] 

To avoid the requirements of 326 IAC 2-2 (Prevention of Significant Deterioration), the Permittee 

shall comply with the following: 

(a) The total reduced sulfur (TRS) emissions from the iron sponge reactor shall not equal or 

exceed 2.28 pounds per hour, which is equivalent to 762 micrograms per liter (ug/l). This 

emission limitation also satisfies the emission limitations for reduced sulfur compounds 

and hydrogen sulfide; and 

(b) TRS, reduced sulfur compounds and hydrogen sulfide emissions from the transfer of biosolids from the storage tanks to trucks shall be controlled by a vapor balance system that 

exhausts to the iron sponge reactor. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 55 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

D.5.4 Preventive Maintenance Plan [326 IAC 2-7-5(13)] 

A Preventive Maintenance Plan, in accordance with Section B - Preventive Maintenance Plan, of 

this permit, is required for the iron sponge reactor system. 

Testing and Monitoring Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-6(1) (6)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.5.5 Sampling and Analysis Requirements [CP 157-4363 Issued August 28, 1996 (Revised by this 

permit), and Amendment 157-8953 Issued November 12, 1997 (Revised by this permit)] 

The Permittee shall measure and record the TRS outlet concentration of the air stream to the 

atmosphere once per calendar week using the sampling protocol and analysis methods most 

recently approved by IDEM. 

D.5.6 Monitoring Requirements [CP 157-4363 Issued August 28, 1996 (Revised by this permit), and 

Amendment 157-8953 Issued November 12, 1997 (Revised by this permit)] 

The Permittee shall monitor and record the pressure drop across the iron sponge reactor annubar 

once per day. Unless operated under conditions for which the Compliance Response Plan (CRP) 

specifies otherwise, the pressure drop across the operating reactor shall be maintained within the 

range of 0.2 and 2 inches of water column. The CRP for the iron sponge reactor system shall 

contain troubleshooting contingency and response steps for when the pressure reading is outside 

of the above-mentioned range for any one reading. 

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-19] 

D.5.7 Record Keeping Requirements [CP 157-4363 Issued August 28, 1996 (Revised by this permit), 

and Amendment 157-8953 Issued November 12, 1997 (Revised by this permit)] 

(a) The Permittee shall maintain the following records: 

(1) daily pressure drop readings across the iron sponge reactor annubar; and 

(2) weekly analysis of the TRS outlet concentration from the iron sponge reactor. 

(b) Pursuant to 40 CFR 60.116b(b), Subpart Kb (New Source Performance Standard for 

Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels) and CP157-4363, issued August 28, 1996, the 

Permittee shall keep readily accessible records of the dimensions and capacity for each 

bio-solids storage tank. These records shall be kept for the life of the source. 

Modifications and Construction Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-10.5, 326 IAC 2-7-12 and 326 IAC 2-2] 

D.5.8 Modifications and Construction: Advance Approval of Permit Conditions Requirements 

The emission units described in this D section are not subject to the advance approval permit 

conditions. 

Compliance Determination Requirements

D.5.9 Operation of Control Equipment [326 IAC 2-7-6(6)]

Except as otherwise provided by statute or rule, or in this permit, the Iron Sponge Reactor shall 

be operated at all times that the emission units vented to the Iron Sponge Reactor are in 

operation. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 56 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION D.6 BULK PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURING (BPM) PRODUCTION OPERATIONS 

Facility description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)]

The information describing the processes contained in the facility description boxes is descriptive 

information and does not constitute enforceable conditions: 

(a) The emission units listed below are subject to applicable requirements described or referred to in 

this D section. The emission units in the BPM production operations can be generally described 

as process vessels (tanks), crystallizers, filters, centrifuges, dryers, process scrubber systems, 

and process condenser systems and are referred to as process vents under the National 

Emission Standards of Hazardous Air Pollutants for Pharmaceutical Production Operations 

(Pharmaceutical MACT) found at 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGG. 

General activities such as open manway operations, charging a liquid from a drum to a tank, 

centrifuge emptying operations, drum filling operations, or loading wetcake into driers are also 

defined as process vents. Individual identification of these activities are not listed in the 

description tables given they are not stationary or continually change. Each of these activity 

types will follow the compliance requirements outlined in this permit section. 

Ancillary activities, such as heat exchange systems, are not considered process vents and have 

not been included in the description tables. 

Source ID Equipment Description Stack/Vent ID Nominal Capacity Control Device 

Building T27: 

T27-TK30-1 Process Tank RTO 200 gal RTO 

T27-TK30-2 Process Tank RTO 200 gal RTO 

T27-TK31-1 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK31-2 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK31-3 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK31-4 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK31-5 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK32-1 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK32-2 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK32-3 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK32-4 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK32-5 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK32-6 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK32-7 Process Tank RTO 350 gal RTO 

T27-TK33-1 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK33-2 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK33-3 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK33-4 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK33-5 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T27-TK33-6 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK34-1 Process Tank RTO 750 gal RTO 

T27-TK34-2 Process Tank RTO 750 gal RTO 

T27-TK34-4 Process Tank RTO 750 gal RTO 

T27-TK34-5 Process Tank RTO 750 gal RTO 

T27-TK34-6 Process Tank RTO 750 gal RTO 

T27-TK34-7 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 57 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Source ID Equipment Description Stack/Vent ID Nominal Capacity Control Device 

T27-TK34-8 Process Tank RTO 350 gal RTO 

T27-TK35-1 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK35-2 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK35-3 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK35-4 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK35-5 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T27-TK35-6 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK35-10B Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK36-1 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK36-2 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK36-3 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK36-6 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK36-7 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T27-TK37-2A Process Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T27-TK38-3 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-1 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-2 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-4 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-5 Process Tank RTO 1500 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-6 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-6A Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-7 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-7A Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-8 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-9 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-10 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-11 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-13 Process Tank RTO 750 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-14 Process Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-31 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T27-TK41-1 Process Tank RTO 750 gal RTO 

T27-TK41-3 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T27-TK41-4 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T27-TK41-5 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK41-6 Process Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T27-TK42-3 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T27-TK42-5 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK43-1 Process Tank RTO 750 gal RTO 

T27-TK43-2 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T27-TK44-1 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK44-4 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK45-2 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK45-3 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK46-1 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK46-5 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK47-1 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK47-2 Process Tank RTO 550 gal RTO 

T27-TK47-3 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 58 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Source ID Equipment Description Stack/Vent ID Nominal Capacity Control Device 

T27-TK47-5 Process Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T27-TK48-1 Process Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T27-TK48-1A Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK48-2A Process Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

T27-TK48-3A Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T27-TK49-1 Process Tank RTO 200 gal RTO 

T27-TK50-1 Process Tank RTO 650 gal RTO 

T27-TK50-2 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T27-TK50-3 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T27-TK50-4 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T27-TK372-A Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T27-CENT9 Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T27-CENT16 Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T27-CENT19 Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T27-CENT30 Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T27-CENT37 Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T27-CENT38 Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T27-CENT40 Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T27-DT46-1 Process Tank RTO RTO 

T27-RVD53-2 Process Dryer RTO NA RTO 

T27-SCR30-4 Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

T27-SCR33-7 Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

T27-SCR34-9 Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

T27-SCR35-10A Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

T27-SCR35-10B Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC31-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC32-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC32-2 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC32-3 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC33-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC33-2 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC33-3 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC33-4 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC35-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC35-2 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC35-4 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC36-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC36-2 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC36-3 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC40 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC40-2 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC40-5 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC40-7A Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC43-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC44-4 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC45-2 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC46-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC47-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 59 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Source ID Equipment Description Stack/Vent ID Nominal Capacity Control Device 

T27-VC48-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC48-1A Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC49-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC50-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC53-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC53-2 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC53-10 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-PORTVC 

Portable Process 

Condenser RTO NA RTO 

Building T28: 

T28-CENT1 Heinkel Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T28-CENT2 Heinkel Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T28-CENT3 Heinkel Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T28-CENT15 Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T28-CENT22 Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T28-CENT24 Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T28-CENT26 Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T28-TK28-1 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-1A Process Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-2 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-3 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-3A Process Tank RTO 340 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-03 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-4 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-5 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-6 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-7 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-8 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-9 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-10 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-10A Process Tank RTO 340 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-11 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-12 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-13 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-14 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-15 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-16 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-17 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-18 Process Tank RTO 750 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-19 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-20 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-21 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-22 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-23 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-24 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-25 Process Tank RTO 1500 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-26 Process Tank RTO 1500 gal RTO 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 60 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Source ID Equipment Description Stack/Vent ID Nominal Capacity Control Device 

T28-TK28-27 Process Tank RTO 140 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-29 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-30 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-31 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-32 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-PTK1 Portable Charge Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T28-PTK2 Portable Charge Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T28-PTK3 Portable Charge Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T28-SCR1 Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

T28-SCR2 Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

T28-SCR3 Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

T28-SCR4 Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

T28-SCR6 Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

T28-SCRTK1 Scrubber Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T28-SCRTK2 Scrubber Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T28-SCRTK4 Scrubber Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T28-VC28-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T28-VC28-3 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T28-VC28-4 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T28-VC28-5 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T28-VC28-6 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T28-VC28-8 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T28-VC28-10 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T28-VC28-11 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T28-VC28-12 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

Building T29: 

T29-CENT1401 Heinkel Centrifuge RTO 70 gal RTO 

T29-CENT2401 Heinkel Centrifuge RTO 70 gal RTO 

T29-CENT3401 Heinkel Centrifuge RTO 70 gal RTO 

T29-DRY1501 Cone Dryer RTO 580 gal RTO 

T29-DRY2402 Filter Dryer RTO 863 gal RTO 

T29-DRY2502 Filter Dryer RTO 863 gal RTO 

T29-DRY3501 Cone Dryer RTO 580 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8201 Process Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8203 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8204 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8205 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8206 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8207 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8209 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8216 Process Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8217 Process Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8251 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8253 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8254 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8256 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8257 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 61 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Source ID Equipment Description Stack/Vent ID Nominal Capacity Control Device 

T29-IBC8259 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8380 Process Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8381 Process Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T29-SFH1121 Process Tank RTO NA RTO 

T29-SFH3121 Process Tank RTO NA RTO 

T29-TK1201 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK1202 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK1203 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK1204 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK1205 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK2201 Process Tank RTO 1600 gal RTO 

T29-TK2202 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK2203 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK2204 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK2205 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK3201 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK3202 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK3203 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK3204 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK3205 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK4201 Process Tank RTO 1600 gal RTO 

T29-TK4203 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK7920 Process Tank RTO 200 gal RTO 

T29-TK7921 Process Tank RTO 80 gal RTO 

T29-TK8211 Process Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

T29-TK8212 Process Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

T29-TK8213 Process Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

T29-TK8214 Process Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

T29-TK8216 Process Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T29-TK8218 Process Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T29-TK8220 Process Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T29-TK8501 Process Tank RTO 0.75 sf RTO 

T29-HE1201 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE1202 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE1203 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE1204 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE1205 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE2201 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE2202 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE2203 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE2204 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE2205 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE3201 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE3202 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE3203 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE3204 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE3205 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE4201 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 62 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Source ID Equipment Description Stack/Vent ID Nominal Capacity Control Device 

T29-HE4203 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-TK1203A Accumulator Tank RTO 70 gal RTO 

T29-TK1204A Accumulator Tank RTO 70 gal RTO 

T29-TK1401A Accumulator Tank RTO 70 gal RTO 

T29-TK2401A Accumulator Tank RTO 70 gal RTO 

T29-TK3401A Accumulator Tank RTO 70 gal RTO 

T29-TK4201A Accumulator Tank RTO 70 gal RTO 

T29-SCR1601 Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

T29-SCR2601 Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

T29-SCR3601 Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

Building T31: 

T31-CENT Centrifuge RTO 13 cf RTO 

T31-CENT504 Centrifuge RTO 13 gal RTO 

T31-FD803 Filter Dryer RTO 0.6 m2 RTO 

T31-TK601 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31-TK602 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31-TK603 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31-TK604 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31-TK611 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31-TK611DT01 Process Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T31-TK612 Process Tank RTO 500gal RTO 

T31-TK613 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31-TK614 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31-TK631 Process Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T31-TK641 Process Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

T31-TK643 Process Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

T31-HE501 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31-HE503 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31-HE511 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31-HE512 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31-HE531 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31-HE541 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31-SCR-OZ 

Process Scrubber 

(Ozone) RTO N/A RTO 

T31-SCR721 Process Scrubber RTO 200 gal RTO 

Building T31A: 

T31A-CENT981 Centrifuge RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-FD861 Filter Dryer RTO 0.6 m2 RTO 

T31A-FD874 Filter Dryer RTO 0.6 m2 RTO 

T31A-RVD881 Dryer RTO 100 cf RTO 

T31A-RVD891 Dryer RTO 100 cf RTO 

T31A-DT683 Drowning Tank 001 RTO NA RTO 

T31A-TK621 Process Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T31A-TK622 Process Tank RTO 800 gal RTO 

T31A-TK623 Process Tank RTO 400 gal RTO 

T31A-TK624 Process Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 63 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Source ID Equipment Description Stack/Vent ID Nominal Capacity Control Device 

T31A-TK625 Process Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T31A-TK626 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31A-TK651 Process Tank RTO 450 gal RTO 

T31A-TK661 Process Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T31A-TK681 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31A-TK682 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31A-TK683 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31A-TK684 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31A-TK691 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31A-TK692 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31A-TK693 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31A-TK694 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31A-TK861K Process Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T31A-HE481 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-HE482 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-HE491 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-HE492 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-HE521 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-HE551 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-HE561 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-HE581 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-HE583 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-HE591 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-HE593 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-HE781 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-HE791 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-SCR261 Process Scrubber RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-SCR262 Process Scrubber RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-SCR781 Process Scrubber RTO 200 gal RTO 

T31A-SCR791 Process Scrubber RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31A-SCRTK781 Process Scrubber Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T31A-SCRTK791 Process Scrubber Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

Building T99: 

T99-CENT Heinkel Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T99-PD43 Pan Dryer RTO 528 gal RTO 

T99-PD44 Pan Dryer RTO 528 gal RTO 

T99-RVD1 Rotary Vacuum Dryer RTO 1200 gal RTO 

T99-RVD2 Rotary Vacuum Dryer RTO 1200 gal RTO 

T99-RVD3 Rotary Vacuum Dryer RTO 1200 gal RTO 

T99-RVD5 Rotary Vacuum Dryer RTO 1200 gal RTO 

T99-RVD6 Rotary Vacuum Dryer RTO 1200 gal RTO 

T99-RVD7 Rotary Vacuum Dryer RTO 1200 gal RTO 

T99-RVD8 Rotary Vacuum Dryer RTO 1200 gal RTO 

T99-FD-9D* Filter Dryer RTO NA RTO 

T99-D-9D* Portable Tank RTO 155 gal RTO 

T99-D-9B* Condensate Tank RTO 10 gal RTO 

T99-TK-D41 Process Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 64 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Source ID Equipment Description Stack/Vent ID Nominal Capacity Control Device 

T99-TK-D42 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T99-HE43 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T99-HE44 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

Building T100: 

T100-CENT60 Centrifuge RTO N/A RTO 

T100-CENT61 Centrifuge RTO N/A RTO 

T100-CENT62 Centrifuge RTO N/A RTO 

T100-CENT63 Centrifuge RTO N/A RTO 

T100-CENT64 Centrifuge RTO N/A RTO 

T100-CENT65 Centrifuge RTO N/A RTO 

T100-CENT66 Centrifuge RTO N/A RTO 

T100-CENT67 Centrifuge RTO N/A RTO 

T100-CENT68 Centrifuge RTO N/A RTO 

T100-CENT69 Centrifuge RTO N/A RTO 

T100-CENT70 Centrifuge RTO N/A RTO 

T100-TK1 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T100-TK1C Process Tank RTO N/A RTO 

T100-TK2 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK3 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T100-TK4 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T100-TK5 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T100-Tk5C* Accumulator Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T100-TK6 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T100-TK7 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK8 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK8C Process Tank RTO 30 gal RTO 

T100-TK9 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK10 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK11 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK12 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK13 Process Tank RTO 3300 Gal RTO 

T100-TK14 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK15 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T100-TK16 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T100-TK17 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T100-TK18 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T100-TK18A* Distillate Tank RTO 200 gal RTO 

T100-TK18B* Charge Tank RTO 60 gal RTO 

T100-TK20 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK21 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK22 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T100-TK24 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK24D* Distillate Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T100-TK25 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK26 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK27 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK28 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 65 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Source ID Equipment Description Stack/Vent ID Nominal Capacity Control Device 

T100-TK29 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK30 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK-30A Process Tank RTO 70 gal RTO 

T100-TK31 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK31B Process Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T100-TK32 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK33 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T100-TK34 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T100-TK35 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T100-TK36 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T100-TK37 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T100-TK38 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T100 Portable Process Tank RTO N/A RTO 

T100-PTK1 Portable Cleaning Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T100-HE1 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE1C Process Condenser N/A 

T100-HE2 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE4 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE6 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE7 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE8 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE11 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE12 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE13 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE14 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE14B Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE16 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE21A Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE21B Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE26 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE28 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE31 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-TK14A Accumulator Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T100-TK21A Accumulator Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T100-TK39 CIP Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T100-SCR80 Process Scrubber RTO N/A RTO 

T100-SCR81 Process Scrubber RTO N/A RTO 

T100-SCR82 Process Scrubber RTO N/A RTO 

T100-SCR83 Process Scrubber RTO N/A RTO 

T100-SCR84 Process Scrubber RTO N/A RTO 

T100-SCR85 Process Scrubber RTO N/A RTO 

T100-TK82 Scrubber Holding Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T100-TK83 Scrubber Holding Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T100-TK84 Scrubber Holding Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T100-TK85 Scrubber Holding Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

* Emission units marked with an asterisk are insignificant activities as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(21). 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 66 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.6.1 Standards for BPM Process Vents [40 CFR 63.1254, 326 IAC 2-2-3, and 326 IAC 8-5-3] 

The following streamlined standards for the BPM process operations satisfy the Maximum 

Achievable Control Technology Standards for Pharmaceutical Production Operations 

(Pharmaceutical MACT) for process vents [40 CFR 63.1254], Prevention of Significant 

Deterioration Best Available Control Technology (PSD BACT) requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3] and 

Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) requirements for synthesized pharmaceutical 

manufacturing operations [326 IAC 8-5-3]: 

(a) Except as otherwise provided in Conditions D.6.1(c) and D.6.2, the emission limits and 

standards applicable for each operating BPM process vent containing undiluted and 

uncontrolled process vent streams equal to or greater than 50 ppmv HAP 50 ppmv VOC 

or 15 pounds per day VOC are described in Section D.14 of this permit. 

(b) The Permittee shall cover all in-process tanks, having an exposed liquid surface 

containing VOC greater than 15 pounds per day unless production, sampling, 

maintenance, or inspection procedures require operator access. 

(c) The Permittee is not required to control emissions from BPM process vents in 

accordance with (a) of this section, if it would result in a safety hazard, as long as the 

sum of the uncontrolled BPM process vent streams within an individual BPM process 

does not exceed an annual mass limit of 900 kilograms (2000 pounds) of HAP per 365-

day period and the sum of all uncontrolled process vent emissions generated during the 

manufacturing of pharmaceutical products do not exceed an annual mass limit of 1800 

kilograms (4000 pounds) of HAP per 365-day period. 

(d) The Permittee shall enclose all centrifuges, rotary vacuum filters, and other filters having 

an exposed liquid surface, where the liquid contains VOC and exerts a total vapor 

pressure of 0.5 pounds per square inch or more at 20OC. 

D.6.2 Control Strategy for Production Equipment Exhaust Systems [40 CFR 63.1254][326 IAC 8-5-3] 

[326 IAC 2-2-3] 

(a) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.1254, production equipment exhaust systems containing 

undiluted and uncontrolled exhaust streams with HAP concentrations greater than fifty 

(50) ppm, HAP shall be routed to the RTO control system. The operation, inspection, and 

maintenance requirements for the RTO control system, and it’s closed - vent system, 

used to control emissions from these emission units are described in Section D.14 of this 

permit. 

(b) Pursuant to 326 IAC 8-5-3(b)(2), VOC emissions from production equipment exhaust 

systems shall not exceed thirty-three (33) pounds per day. If uncontrolled VOC emissions 

from a production equipment exhaust system would exceed thirty three (33) pounds per 

day, then the Permittee shall route VOC emissions from that production equipment 

exhaust system to the RTO control system. The operation, inspection, and maintenance 

requirements for the RTO control system, and its closed vent system, used to control 

emissions from these emission units are described in Section D.14 of this permit. 

(c) Pursuant to 326 IAC 2-2-3, VOC BACT for production equipment exhaust systems not 

meeting the criteria of D.6.2(a) or D.6.2(b) is no controls. If the process affiliated with a 

production equipment exhaust system that is not routed to the RTO control system is 

modified in a manner that causes the criteria in Condition D.6.2(a) or D.6.2(b) to apply, 

the Permittee shall connect the production equipment exhaust system to the RTO control 

system before beginning any operations that would cause D.6.2(a) or D.6.2(b) to be 

applicable. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 67 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

D.6.3 Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) Standards [326 IAC 2-2-3, 326 IAC 8-5-3, and 40 CFR 

63.1255] 

The LDAR standards that apply to components associated with the BPM production operations 

are described in Sections E.1 and E.2 of this permit. 

D.6.4 Heat Exchange System Requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3 and 40 CFR 63.1252(c)(2)] 

(a) The Permittee shall inspect the physical integrity of heat exchange systems that use 

water to cool process equipment or materials used in pharmaceutical manufacturing 

operations in accordance with the following current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) 

requirements of 21 CFR 211 to satisfy the streamlined standards of the Pharmaceutical 

MACT for heat exchange systems [40 CFR 63.1252(c)(2)] and the PSD BACT 

requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3]: 

(1) Assignment of responsibility for maintaining equipment; 

(2) Maintenance schedules; and 

(3) Description in sufficient detail of the methods, equipment, and materials used in 

maintenance operations, and the methods of disassembling and reassembling 

equipment as necessary to assure proper maintenance. 

D.6.5 Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3, 40 CFR 63.1259(a)(3), and 

40 CFR 63.6(e) and 63.8(c)] 

The NESHAP General Provisions for Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction (SSM) Plans [40 CFR 

63.6(e) and 63.8(c)] shall be used to satisfy the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 

63.1259(a)(3)], and PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11]. 

(a) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3), the Permittee shall develop an SSM Plan to ensure that 

processes are operated and maintained in a manner which satisfies the general duty to 

minimize emissions established by 40 CFR 63.6(e)(1)(i), and that all malfunctions are 

corrected as soon as practicable after their occurrence in order to minimize excess 

emissions. The SSM Plan shall contain the following information: 

(1) Detailed plans and/or procedures for operating and maintaining the process 

during periods of SSM; and 

(2) Corrective action program for malfunctioning processes. 

(b) The startup, shutdown and malfunction (SSM) requirements for the RTO control system, 

and associated closed-vent system, are described in Section D.14 of this permit. 

Testing and Monitoring Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-6(1) (6)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.6.6 Requirements 

The requirements for the RTO control system, and its associated closed-vent system, used to 

control emissions from the emission units listed in this section are described in Section D.14 of 

this permit. 

D.6.7 Monitoring Requirements 

The monitoring requirements for the RTO control system, and its associated closed-vent system, 

used to control emissions from the applicable emission units listed in this section are described in 

Section D.14 of this permit. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 68 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Record Keeping and Reporting [326 IAC 2-7-5(3) and 326 IAC 2-7-19] 

D.6.8 Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements 

(a) Record Keeping Requirements 

(1) RTO Control System Records - The record keeping and reporting requirements 

for the RTO control system, and associated closed-vent systems, used to control 

emissions from the emission units listed in this section are described in Section 

D.14 of this permit. 

(2) Process Records - The Permittee shall maintain the following records if the 98% 

Control Efficiency Emission Standard is used to demonstrate compliance with the 

requirements of the Pharmaceutical MACT (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGG): 

(A) Daily rolling annual total HAP emissions; 

(B) Number of batches per year for each batch process; 

(C) Standard batch uncontrolled and controlled emissions for each process; 

(D) Actual uncontrolled and controlled emissions for each nonstandard 

batch; and 

(E) Record whether each batch operated was considered a standard batch. 

(3) Heat Exchange System Records - Maintenance records, including the date, time, 

and sign off or initials of the individual who completed the task, of all heat 

exchange systems that use water to cool process equipment or materials used in 

pharmaceutical manufacturing operations. The Permittee shall track the heat 

exchange systems that use water to cool process equipment or materials used in 

pharmaceutical manufacturing operations in an operating scenario maintained in 

the On-Site Implementation Log (OSIL). 

(4) LDAR Records - The record keeping and reporting requirements for the LDAR 

standards are described in Sections E.1and E.2 of this permit. 

(5) SSM Records - The Permittee shall maintain the following records: 

(A) Records of the current and superseded versions of SSM Plan. 

(B) Occurrence/duration records of each process malfunction. 

(C) Information to demonstrate conformance with each SSM is consistent 

with the procedures in the SSM Plan. 

(D) Records of actions taken during each SSM when different from SSM 

Plan. 

(b) Periodic Reporting Requirements 

(1) The following streamlined quarterly reporting requirements shall satisfy the 

Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1256(b)] and the PSD BACT 

requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11]: 

(A) SSM summary reports for the processes. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 69 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(B) The reporting requirements for the RTO control system, and associated 

closed-vent system, that controls emissions from the emission units 

listed in this section are described in Section D.14 of this permit. 

(C) The reporting requirements for the LDAR standards are described in 

Sections E.1 and E.2 of this permit. 

(c) Immediate Reporting Requirements 

The reporting requirements in the NESHAP General Provisions for Startup, Shutdown 

and Malfunction (SSM) Plans [40 CFR 63.6(e)(3)] shall be used to satisfy the reporting 

requirements under the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1259(a)(3)], and 

PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11]. 

(1) Any time an action taken by the Permittee during an SSM event of a process is 

not consistent with the procedures specified in the SSM Plan, the Permittee shall 

report the actions taken for that event. The immediate report shall be submitted 

to the agency via a telephone call or facsimile within 2 working days after 

commencing actions inconsistent with the plan. 

(2) Within 7 working days after the end of an SSM event of a process where an 

action taken by the Permittee is not consistent with the procedures specified in 

the SSM Plan, the Permittee shall submit a letter containing the following 

information in accordance with 40 CFR 63.10(d)(5): 

(A) Name, title and signature of responsible official certifying accuracy; 

(B) Explanation of the circumstances for the event; 

(C) Reason for not following the SSM Plan; and 

(D) Report any excess emissions and/or parameter monitoring exceedances 

are believed to have occurred. 

Modifications and Construction Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-10.5, 326 IAC 2-7-12 and 326 IAC 2-2] 

D.6.9 Modifications and Construction: Advance Approval of Permit Conditions 

(a) The Permittee may modify any existing emission units listed in this section of the permit 

without obtaining a source modification approval (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-

10.5), a Title V permit modification (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-2), 

provided the modified emission units are subject to the same applicable requirements 

listed in this D section, and the Permittee shall comply with the Change Management and 

Flexible Permit provisions in Section F.1 of this permit. 

(b) The Permittee may construct and install new emission units of the types described in this 

D section without obtaining a source modification approval (otherwise required by 326 

IAC 2-7-10.5), a Title V permit modification (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-2), 

provided the new emission units are subject to the same applicable requirements listed in 

this D section, and the Permittee shall comply with the Change Management and Flexible 

Permit provisions in Section F.1 of this permit. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 70 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION D.7 BPM SUPPORT OPERATIONS – SOLVENT RECOVERY OPERATIONS 

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The information describing the processes contained in the facility description boxes is descriptive 

information and does not constitute enforceable conditions: 

(a) The emission units listed below are subject to applicable requirements described or referred to in 

this D section. The BPM solvent recovery emission units can be generally described as columns, 

stills, evaporators, accumulators, process condensers and receivers and are referred to as 

process vents under the National Emission Standards of Hazardous Air Pollutants for 

Pharmaceutical Production Operations (Pharmaceutical MACT) found at 40 CFR 63, Subpart 

GGG and OSW MACT found at 40 CFR 63, Subpart DD. The solvent recovery columns may 

also be defined as treatment units under the OSW MACT. 

Ancillary activities, such as heat exchange systems, are not considered process vents and have 

not been included in the description tables. 

Emission 

Unit ID 

Emission Unit 

Description Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity 

Control 

Device 

Building T19: 

T19-STL1 Still T79 1500 gal T79 

T19-STL2 Still T79 4000 gal T79 

T19-COL3 Column T79 NA T79 

T19-REC1 Receiver T79 2000 gal T79 

T19-REC10 Receiver T79 2000 gal T79 

T19-REC11 Receiver T79 5300 gal T79 

T19-REC2 Receiver T79 2000 gal T79 

T19-REC3 Receiver T79 2000 gal T79 

T19-REC6 Receiver T79 or RTO* 500 gal T79 or RTO* 

T19-REC7 Receiver T79 or RTO* 500 gal T79 or RTO* 

T19-REC8 Receiver T79 or RTO* 500 gal T79 or RTO* 

T19-REC9 Receiver T79 500 gal T79 

Building T52: 

T52-REC52-3 Receiver T79 2000 gal T79 

T52-REC52-4 Receiver T79 2000 gal T79 

T52-REC52-1 Stainless Receiver T79 or RTO* 2000 gal T79 or RTO* 

T52-REC52-11 Receiver T79 or RTO* 4000 gal T79 or RTO* 

T52-REC52-12 Receiver T79 or RTO* 4000 gal T79 or RTO* 

T52-REC52-13 Receiver T79 or RTO* 4000 gal T79 or RTO* 

T52-REC52-2 Stainless Receiver T79 or RTO* 2000 gal T79 or RTO* 

T52-ACC10 Accumulator T79 or RTO* NA T79 or RTO* 

T52-ACC5 Accumulator T79 or RTO* NA T79 or RTO* 

T52-ACC6 Accumulator T79 or RTO* NA T79 or RTO* 

T52-COL52-8 Wash Column T79 or RTO* NA T79 or RTO* 

T52-EVAP10 Evaporator T79 or RTO* 2000 gal T79 or RTO* 

T52-EVAP5 Evaporator T79 or RTO* 2000 gal T79 or RTO* 

T52-EVAP6 Evaporator T79 or RTO* 2000 gal T79 or RTO* 

T52-STPR52-14 Steam Stripper T79 or RTO* 250 gal T79 or RTO* 

T52-ACC14 Accumulator T79 or RTO* NA T79 or RTO* 

Building T61: 

T61-COL61-1 Column T79 NA T79 

T61-COL61-2 Column T79 NA T79 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 71 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Emission 

Unit ID 

Emission Unit 

Description Stack/Vent Nominal 

Capacity 

Control 

Device 

T61-COL61-3 Column T79 NA T79 

T61-REC1 Receiver T79 5000 gal T79 

T61-REC2 Receiver T79 5000 gal T79 

T61-REC3 Receiver T79 5000 gal T79 

T61-REC4 Receiver T79 5000 gal T79 

T61-REC5 Receiver T79 5000 gal T79 

T61-REC6 Receiver T79 5000 gal T79 

T61-REC7 Receiver T79 5000 gal T79 

T61-REC8 Receiver T79 5000 gal T79 

* This equipment is currently not in service; however, this equipment shall be tied into 

either the RTO control system or the T79 control system upon startup. 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.7.1 Standards for BPM Support Process Vents [40 CFR 63.1254, CFR 63.690, 326 IAC 2-2-3, and 

326 IAC 8-5-3] 

The following streamlined standards for the BPM solvent recovery operations satisfy the 

Pharmaceutical MACT Standards for process vents [40 CFR 63.1254], OSWRO MACT 

Standards for process vents [40 CFR 63.690], PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3] and 

RACT requirements for synthesized pharmaceutical manufacturing operations [326 IAC 8-5-3]: 

(a) Except as otherwise provided in Condition D.7.1(c), the emission limits and standards for 

each operating BPM process vent containing undiluted and uncontrolled process vent 

streams equal to or greater than 50 ppmv VOHAP and/or 50 ppmv VOC are described in 

SECTION D.14 for emission units controlled by the RTO control system and described in 

SECTION D.15 for emission units controlled by the T79 fume incinerator control system. 

(b) The Permittee shall cover all in-process tanks associated with the BPM solvent recovery 

operations, having an exposed liquid surface containing VOC greater than 15 pounds per 

day unless production sampling, maintenance, or inspection procedures require operator 

access. 

(c) The Permittee is not required to control emissions from BPM Support process vents in 

accordance with (a) of this section, if it would result in a safety hazard, as long as the 

sum of the uncontrolled BPM Support process vent streams within an individual BPM 

process does not exceed an annual mass limit of 900 kilograms (2000 pounds) of HAP 

per 365-day period and the sum of all uncontrolled process vent emissions generated 

during the manufacturing of pharmaceutical products do not exceed an annual mass limit 

of 1800 kilograms (4000 pounds) of HAP per 365-day period. 

(d) The Permittee shall enclose all centrifuges, rotary vacuum filters, and other filters having 

an exposed liquid surface, where the liquid contains VOC and exerts a total vapor 

pressure of 0.5 pounds per square inch or more at 20OC. 

D.7.2 Treatment Unit Requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3 and 40 CFR 63.684] 

When a solvent recovery column is used as the final treatment step to treat off-site waste 

containing VOHAP or VOC equal to or greater than 500 ppmw, the Permittee shall reduce the 

VOHAP and VOC concentrations of the off-site material to a level that is less than 500 ppmw to 

satisfy the requirements of 326 IAC 2-2-3 and 40 CFR 63.684(b). 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 72 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

D.7.3 Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) for Fugitive Emissions [326 IAC 2-2-3 and 40 CFR 63.1255] 

The LDAR standards that apply to components associated with the BPM solvent recovery 

operations are described in Sections E.1 and E.2 of this permit. 

D.7.4 Heat Exchange System Requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3 and 40 CFR 63.1252(c)(2)] 

(a) The Permittee shall inspect the physical integrity of heat exchange systems that use 

water to cool process equipment or materials used in pharmaceutical manufacturing 

operations in accordance with the following current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) 

requirements of 21 CFR 211 to satisfy the streamlined standards of the Pharmaceutical 

MACT for heat exchangers [40 CFR 63.1252(c)(2)] and the PSD BACT requirements 

[326 IAC 2-2-3]: 

(1) Assignment of responsibility for maintaining equipment; 

(2) Maintenance schedules; and 

(3) Description in sufficient detail of the methods, equipment, and materials used in 

maintenance operations, and the methods of disassembling and reassembling 

equipment as necessary to assure proper maintenance - 211.67(b)(3). 

D.7.5 Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3, 40 CFR 63.1259(a)(3), 40 CFR 

63.697(b)(3), and 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3) and 63.8(c)] 

The NESHAP General Provisions for Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction (SSM) Plans [40 CFR 

63.6(e) and 63.8(c)] shall be used to satisfy the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 

63.1259(a)(3)], Offsite Waste MACT standards [40 CFR 63.697(b)(3)] and PSD BACT 

requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11]. 

(a) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3), the Permittee shall develop an SSM Plan to ensure that 

processes are operated and maintained in a manner which satisfies the general duty to 

minimize emissions established by 40 CFR 63.6(e)(1)(i), and that all malfunctions are 

corrected as soon as practicable after their occurrence in order to minimize excess 

emissions. The SSM Plan shall contain the following information: 

(1) Detailed plans and/or procedures for operating and maintaining the process 

during periods of SSM; and 

(2) Corrective action program for malfunctioning processes. 

(b) The startup, shutdown and malfunction (SSM) requirements for the RTO control system 

or T79 control system, and associated closed-vent systems, are described in Sections 

D.14 and D.15 of this permit, respectively. 

Testing and Monitoring Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-6(1) (6)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.7.6 Requirements 

(a) The requirements for the RTO control system and T79 control system, and associated 

closed-vent systems, used to control emissions from the emission units listed in this 

section are described in Sections D.14 and D.15 of this permit, respectively. 

(b) The following streamlined requirements for the solvent recovery columns that treat offsite waste shall satisfy the Offsite Waste MACT standards [40 CFR 63.684(d) and (e)] 

and the PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11]: 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 73 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(1) An initial and annual demonstration shall be performed within 30 days after first 

time an owner or operator begins using the treatment process to manage a new 

off-site material stream equal to or greater than 500 ppmw VOHAP or VOC in 

accordance with the requirements of either § 63.683(b)(1)(ii) or § 63.683(b)(2)(ii). 

(2) The Permittee shall establish solvent recovery column temperature limits for 

each off-site waste material stream equal to or greater than 500 ppmw VOHAP 

or VOC. The Permittee shall monitor the temperature as follows: 

(A) The Permittee shall install and operate the temperature CMS in 

accordance with 40 CFR 63.8(c). 

(B) Each CMS shall be in continuous operation when the solvent recovery 

column is receiving off-site waste streams equal to or greater than 500 

ppmw VOHAP or VOC, except for system malfunctions (breakdowns, out 

of control periods, and associated repairs), maintenance periods, 

calibration checks and zero (low-level) and high-level calibration drift 

adjustments. 

(C) Continuous operation is defined as the collection of at least one 

measurement for each successive 15-minute period. 

D.7.7 Monitoring Requirements 

The monitoring requirements for the RTO control system and T79 control system, and associated 

closed-vent systems, used to control emissions from the applicable emission units listed in this 

section are described in Sections D.14 and D.15 of this permit, respectively. 

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-5(3) and 326 IAC 2-7-19] 

D.7.8 Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements 

(a) Record Keeping Requirements 

(1) RTO Control System and T79 Control System Records - The record keeping 

requirements for the RTO control system and T79 control system, and 

associated closed-vent systems, used to control emissions from the emission 

units listed in this section are described in Sections D.14 and D.15 of this permit, 

respectively. 

(2) LDAR Records - The record keeping requirements for the LDAR standards are 

described in Sections E.1 and E.2 of this permit. 

(3) Process Records – The Permittee shall maintain the following records: 

(A) Daily rolling annual total HAP emissions; 

(B) Number of batches per year for each batch process; 

(C) Standard batch uncontrolled and controlled emissions for each process; 

(D) Actual uncontrolled and controlled emissions for each nonstandard 

batch; and 

(E) Record whether each batch operated was considered a standard batch. 

(4) Solvent Recovery Records – The Permittee shall track how the solvent recovery 

columns are being utilized in an operating scenario maintained in the On-Site 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 74 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Implementation Log. If a solvent recovery column is used as a treatment column 

for offsite waste, then the Permittee shall maintain the following records: 

(A) Initial and annual demonstration records; 

(B) Records of all required CMS data; 

(C) Records of each CMS calibration checks; 

(D) Maintenance records for each CMS; and 

(E) Occurrence/duration records of each CMS malfunction. 

(5) Heat Exchange System Records - Maintenance records, including the date, time, 

and sign off or initials of the individual who completed the task, of all heat 

exchange systems that use water to cool process equipment or materials used in 

pharmaceutical manufacturing operations. The Permittee shall track the heat 

exchange systems that use water to cool process equipment or materials used in 

pharmaceutical manufacturing operations in an operating scenario maintained in 

the On-Site Implementation Log (OSIL). 

(6) SSM Records - The Permittee shall maintain the following records: 

(A) Records of the current and superseded versions of SSM Plan. 

(B) Occurrence/duration records of each process malfunction. 

(C) Information to demonstrate conformance with each SSM are consistent 

with the procedures in the SSM Plan. 

(D) Records of actions taken during each SSM when different from SSM 

Plan. 

(7) All records shall be maintained in accordance with Section C - General Record 

Keeping Requirements, of this permit. 

(b) Periodic Reporting Requirements 

(1) The following streamlined quarterly reporting requirements shall satisfy the 

Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1256(b)], Offsite Waste MACT [40 

CFR 63.697(b)(3)] and the PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11]: 

(A) SSM summary reports for the processes. 

(B) The reporting requirements for the RTO control system, T79 fume 

incinerator control system, and associated closed-vent systems that 

control emissions from the emission units listed in this section are 

described in Sections D.14 and D.15 of this permit, respectively. 

(C) The reporting requirements for the LDAR standards are described in 

Sections E.1 and E.2 of this permit. 

(c) Immediate Reporting Requirements 

The reporting requirements in the NESHAP General Provisions for Startup, Shutdown 

and Malfunction (SSM) Plans [40 CFR 63.6(e)(3)] shall be used to satisfy the reporting 

requirements under the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1259(a)(3)], Offsite 

Waste MACT standards [40 CFR 63.697(b)(3), and PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-

1.1-11]. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 75 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(1) Any time an action taken by the Permittee during an SSM event of a process is 

not consistent with the procedures specified in the SSM Plan, the Permittee shall 

report the actions taken for that event. The immediate report shall be submitted 

to the agency via a telephone call or facsimile within 2 working days after 

commencing actions inconsistent with the plan. 

(2) Within 7 working days after the end of an SSM event of a process where an 

action taken by the Permittee is not consistent with the procedures specified in 

the SSM Plan, the Permittee shall submit a letter containing the following 

information in accordance with 40 CFR 63.10(d)(5): 

(A) Name, title and signature of responsible official certifying accuracy; 

(B) Explanation of the circumstances of the event; 

(C) Reason for not following the SSM Plan; and 

(D) Report any excess emissions and/or parameter monitoring exceedances 

are believed to have occurred. 

Modifications and Construction Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-10.5, 326 IAC 2-7-12 and 326 IAC 2-2] 

D.7.9 Modifications and Construction: Advance Approval of Permit Conditions 

(a) The Permittee may modify any existing emission units listed in this section of the permit 

without obtaining a source modification approval (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7- 

10.5), a Title V permit modification (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-2), 

provided the modified emission units are subject to the same applicable requirements 

listed in this D section, and the Permittee shall comply with the Change Management and 

Flexible Permit provisions in Section F.1 of this permit. 

(b) The Permittee may construct and install new emission units of the types described in this 

D section without obtaining a source modification approval (otherwise required by 326 

IAC 2-7-10.5), a Title V permit modification (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-2), 

provided the new emission units are subject to the same applicable requirements listed in 

this D section, and the Permittee shall comply with the Change Management and Flexible 

Permit provisions in Section F.1 of this permit. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 76 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION D.8 BPM SUPPORT OPERATIONS – INDIVIDUAL DRAIN SYSTEM CONDITIONS

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The information describing the processes contained in the following facility description boxes is 

descriptive information and does not constitute enforceable conditions: 

The emission units listed below are subject to applicable requirements described or referred to in this D 

section. These sumps are defined as individual drain systems under the National Emission Standards of 

Hazardous Air Pollutants for Pharmaceutical Production Operations (Pharmaceutical MACT) found at 40 

CFR 63, Subpart GGG. 

Unit ID Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal 

Capacity 

Control 

Device 

Building T27: 

T27-Sump* Sump Tank/Lift Station RTO 2000 gal RTO 

Building T28: 

T28-Sump* Sump RTO 1300 gal RTO 

Building T31: 

T31-Sump* Sump RTO 5900 gal RTO 

Building T31A: 

T31A-Sump* Sump RTO 300 gal RTO 

Building T19:

T19-1-Sump* Sump None None 

Building T149: 

T149-TK782* IDS None 100 gal None 

* Emission units marked with an asterisk are insignificant activities as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(21)(A)-(C). 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.8.1 BPM Individual Drain System (IDS) Standards [40 CFR 63.1256(e), 40 CFR 63.689(b), and 326 

IAC 2-2-3] 

The following streamlined standards for BPM IDSs satisfy the requirements of the Pharmaceutical 

MACT Standards for individual drain systems [40 CFR 63.1256(e)], OSWRO MACT Standards 

for transfer systems [40 CFR 63.689(b)], and PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3]: 

(a) Definition Standards: 

(1) A BPM IDS is defined as any stationary system used to convey waste streams 

containing HAP or VOC to a waste management unit. A segregated stormwater 

sewer system, which is a drain and collection system designed and operated for 

the sole purpose of collecting rainfall-runoff at a facility, and which is segregated 

from all other individual drain systems, is excluded from this definition. An IDS 

that is used for the sole purpose of collecting wastewater from drips, spills and 

leaks, or water from safety showers, condensation and fire deluge systems, is 

excluded from this definition. For purposes of inspections in Section D.8.1(c), a 

BPM IDS includes any fixed roof, cover, and/or enclosure, and closed vent 

system section from the IDS to the inlet of the production building roof fan 

exhausting to the control device or to the IDS conservation vent. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 77 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(b) Operational Standards: 

(1) The Permittee shall cover the openings of each operating BPM IDS containing 

waste equal to or greater than 500 parts per million by weight (ppmw) HAP 

and/or 500 ppmw VOC at all times during use except when it is necessary to use 

the opening for sampling or removal of material, or for equipment inspection, 

maintenance, or repair; and 

(2) Except as otherwise provided in this Condition, the emission limits and standards 

for each operating BPM IDS containing waste equal to or greater than 500 ppmw 

HAP and/or 500 ppmw VOC are described in SECTION D.14 for emission units 

controlled by the RTO control system and described in SECTION D.15 for 

emission units controlled by the T79 fume incinerator control system; or

(3) For each BPM IDS equipped with a water seal, the Permittee is not subject to the 

requirements in (1) and (2) of this section, but instead shall ensure that the water 

seal is maintained on a semiannual basis. For example, a flow-monitoring device 

indicating positive flow from a main to a branch water line supplying a trap or 

water being continuously dripped into the trap by a hose could be used to verify 

flow of water to the trap. Visual observation is also an acceptable alternative. 

(c) Inspection Standards: 

(1) For each BPM IDS containing waste equal to or greater than 500 ppmw HAP 

and/or 500 ppmw VOC, the Permittee shall perform the following visual 

inspections and, when necessary, comply with the following repair requirements: 

(A) Initial and semiannual visual inspections of each BPM IDS for improper 

work practices such as leaving open any access hatch or other opening 

when such hatch or opening is not in use for sampling or removal, or for 

equipment inspection, maintenance, or repair. 

(B) Initial and semiannual visual inspections of each BPM IDS for control 

equipment failures such as a cracked or broken joint, lid, cover, or door. 

(C) Initiate repair of any leak no later than 5 calendar days after 

identification, and complete repair within 15 days after identification, 

except for the following allowances for delay of repair: 

(i) Repair is technically infeasible without a shutdown; 

(ii) Emissions resulting from immediate repair would be greater than 

the emissions likely to result from delay of repair. In such cases, 

repair shall occur by the end of the next shutdown; 

(iii) Equipment is emptied or is no longer used to treat waste equal to 

or greater than 500 ppmw HAP and/or VOC; or 

(iv) Unavailability of parts beyond the control of the Permittee. 

(2) For each BPM IDS containing waste equal to or greater than 500 ppmw HAP 

and/or 500 ppmw VOC and not operated under negative pressure, the Permittee 

shall perform the following additional inspections and, when necessary, comply 

with the following repair requirements:

(A) Initial one-time Method 21 inspection on the cover of each BPM IDS. For 

new equipment, this inspection shall be performed within 150 days upon 

startup of the new equipment. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 78 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(B) Semiannual visual inspections for visible, audible, or olfactory indications 

of leaks. 

(C) Initiate repair of any leak no later than 5 calendar days after 

identification, and complete repair within 15 days after identification, 

except for the following situations: 

(i) Delay of repair is allowed if the repair is technically infeasible 

without a shutdown; or 

(ii) Delay of repair is allowed if the emissions resulting from 

immediate repair would be greater than the emissions likely to 

result from delay of repair. 

(3) For each BPM IDS equipped with a water seal, the Permittee is not subject to the 

requirements in (1) and (2) of this section, but instead shall ensure that the water 

seal is maintained on a semiannual basis. For example, a flow-monitoring device 

indicating positive flow from a main to a branch water line supplying a trap or 

water being continuously dripped into the trap by a hose could be used to verify 

flow of water to the trap. Visual observation is also an acceptable alternative. 

(4) BPM IDSs containing waste equal to or greater than 500 ppmw HAP and/or 500 

ppmw VOC that are unsafe or difficult to inspect are not subject to the 

requirements of D.8.1 (b)(2) and D.8.1(c). 

D.8.2 Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Requirements [40 CFR 63.1259(a)(3), 40 CFR 63.697(b)(3), 

326 IAC 2-2-3, 40 CFR 63.6(e) and 40 CFR 63.8(c)] 

The NESHAP General Provisions for Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction (SSM) Plans [40 CFR 

63.6(e) and 63.8(c)] shall be used to satisfy the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 

63.1259(a)(3)], Offsite Waste MACT standards [40 CFR 63.697(b)(3)] and PSD BACT 

requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11]. 

(a) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3), the Permittee shall develop an SSM Plan to ensure that 

processes are operated and maintained in a manner which satisfies the general duty to 

minimize emissions established by 40 CFR 63.6(e)(1)(i), and that all malfunctions are 

corrected as soon as practicable after their occurrence in order to minimize excess 

emissions. The SSM Plan shall contain the following information: 

(1) Detailed plans and/or procedures for operating and maintaining the process 

during periods of SSM; and 

(2) Corrective action program for malfunctioning processes. 

(b) The startup, shutdown and malfunction (SSM) requirements for the RTO control system 

or T79 control system, are described in Sections D.14 and D.15 of this permit, 

respectively. 

Testing and Monitoring Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-6(1) (6)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.8.3 Requirements 

(a) The compliance determination requirements for the RTO control system and T79 fume 

incinerator control system, and associated closed-vent systems, used to control 

emissions from the emission units listed in this section are described in Sections D.14 

and D.15 of this permit, respectively. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 79 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(b) The Permittee shall utilize engineering knowledge of the waste stream constituents such 

as material balances to demonstrate the average VOHAP and/or VOC concentration is 

less than 500 ppmw for each BPM IDS that is not controlled in accordance with D.8.3 (a). 

D.8.4 Monitoring Requirements 

The monitoring requirements for the RTO control system and T79 fume incinerator control 

system, and associated closed-vent systems, used to control emissions from the emission units 

listed in this section are described in Sections D.14 and D.15 of this permit, respectively. 

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-10.5, 326 IAC 2-7-12 and 326 IAC 2-2] 

D.8.5 Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements 

(a) Record Keeping Requirements 

(1) RTO Control System and T79 Control System Records - The record keeping 

requirements for the RTO control system and T79 fume incinerator control 

system, and associated closed-vent systems that control emissions from the 

emission units listed in this section are described in Sections D.14 and D.15 of 

this permit, respectively. 

(2) Inspection and Maintenance Records - The Permittee shall maintain the following 

records: 

(A) Identification and explanation of all BPM IDS covers unsafe to inspect, 

including a plan for when these IDS covers will be inspected; 

(B) Identification and explanation of all BPM IDS covers difficult to inspect, 

including a plan for when these IDS covers will be inspected; 

(C) Visual inspection log of BPM IDSs, including the date of inspection and a 

statement that no leaks were detected, if applicable; 

(D) One-time Method 21 inspection log of each BPM IDS cover, including the 

date of inspection and a statement that no leaks were detected, if 

applicable; 

(E) Information on each BPM IDS cover inspection during which a leak is 

detected, including: 

(i) Instrument identification numbers, operator name or initials, and 

identification of the equipment; 

(ii) Date the leak was detected and the date of the first attempt to 

repair the leak; 

(iii) Maximum instrument reading measured after leak is successfully 

repaired or determined to be nonrepairable; 

(iv) Reason for any delay of repair if leak not repaired within 15 

calendar days after discovery of the leak; 

(v) Name, initials, or other form of identification of person whose 

decision it was that repair could not be effected without a 

shutdown; 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 80 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(vi) Expected date of successful repair of leak if leak not required 

within 15 calendar days after discovery of leak; 

(vii) Dates of shutdowns that occur while the equipment is 

unrepaired; and 

(viii) Date of successful repair of the leak. 

(F) Documentation of a decision to use a delay of repair due to unavailability 

of parts shall include a description of the failure, the reason additional 

time was necessary (including a statement of why replacement parts 

were not kept onsite and when delivery from the manufacturer is 

scheduled), and the date when the repair was completed. 

(3) SSM Records - The Permittee shall maintain the following records: 

(A) Records of the current and superseded versions of SSM Plan. 

(B) Occurrence/duration records of each process malfunction. 

(C) Information to demonstrate conformance with each SSM are consistent 

wit the procedures in the SSM Plan. 

(D) Records of actions taken during each SSM when different from SSM 

Plan. 

(4) IDS Waste Stream Records - The Permittee shall identify each IDS not controlled 

by the RTO or T79 control system and maintain documentation to support the 

average waste stream constituents of VOHAP and/or VOC concentration are less 

than 500 ppmw. 

(b) Periodic Reporting Requirements 

(1) The following streamlined quarterly reporting requirements shall satisfy the 

Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1256(b)] and the PSD BACT 

requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11]: 

(A) Inspections conducted during which a leak was detected; and 

(B) SSM summary reports for the processes. 

 

(C) The reporting requirements for the RTO control system, T79 fume 

incinerator control system, and associated closed-vent systems that 

control emissions from the emission units listed in this section are 

described in Sections D.14 and D.15 of this permit, respectively. 

(c) Immediate Reporting Requirements 

The reporting requirements in the NESHAP General Provisions for Startup, Shutdown 

and Malfunction (SSM) Plans [40 CFR 63.6(e)(3)] shall be used to satisfy the reporting 

requirements under the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1259(a)(3)], Offsite 

Waste MACT standards [40 CFR 63.697(b)(3), and PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-

1.1-11]. 

(1) Any time an action taken by the Permittee during an SSM event of a process is 

not consistent with the procedures specified in the SSM Plan, the Permittee shall 

report the actions taken for that event. The immediate report shall be submitted 

to the agency via a telephone call or facsimile within 2 working days after 

commencing actions inconsistent with the plan. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 81 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(2) Within 7 working days after the end of an SSM event of a process where an 

action taken by the Permittee is not consistent with the procedures specified in 

the SSM Plan, the Permittee shall submit a letter containing the following 

information in accordance with 40 CFR 63.10(d)(5): 

(A) Name, title and signature of responsible official certifying accuracy; 

(B) Explanation of the circumstances for the event; 

(C) Reason for not following the SSM Plan; and 

(D) Report any excess emissions and/or parameter monitoring exceedances 

are believed to have occurred. 

Modifications and Construction Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-10.5, 326 IAC 2-7-12 and 326 IAC 2-2] 

D.8.6 Modifications and Construction: Advance Approval of Permit Conditions 

(a) The Permittee may modify any existing emission units listed in this section of the permit 

without obtaining a source modification approval (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-

10.5), a Title V permit modification (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-2), 

provided the modified emission units are subject to the same applicable requirements 

listed in this D section, and the Permittee shall comply with the Change Management and 

Flexible Permit provisions in Section F.1 of this permit. 

(b) The Permittee may construct and install new emission units of the types described in this 

D section without obtaining a source modification approval (otherwise required by 326 

IAC 2-7-10.5), a Title V permit modification (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-2), 

provided the new emission units are subject to the same applicable requirements listed in 

this D section, and the Permittee shall comply with the Change Management and Flexible 

Permit provisions in Section F.1 of this permit. 

Non-Applicability of Requirements 

D.8.7 Non-Applicability Determinations [326 IAC 8-5-3] 

The control requirements of the Synthesized Pharmaceutical RACT rules (326 IAC 8-5-3) do not 

apply to the individual drain systems identified above in the Facility Description section because 

the potential to emit VOC emissions from each facility is less than the rule applicability threshold 

level of 6.8 kilograms per day (15 pounds per day). 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 82 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION D.9 BPM SUPPORT OPERATIONS – SOLVENT STORAGE TANK CONDITIONS 

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The information describing the processes contained in the following facility description boxes is 

descriptive information and does not constitute enforceable conditions: 

Emission 

Unit ID Emission Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity 

Control 

Device 

Building T143 – Tank Module: 

T143-TK01 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 38,245 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK03 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 38,245 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK05 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 38,245 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK07 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 38,245 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK09 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 38,245 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK11 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 38,245 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK12 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK13 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK14 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK17 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK18 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK19 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK20 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK21 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK22 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK23 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK24 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

Building T145 – Tank Module: 

T145-TK25 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK26 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK27 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK28 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK29 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK30 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK31 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK32 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK33 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK34 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK35 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK36 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK37 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 83 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Emission 

Unit ID Emission Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity 

Control 

Device 

T145-TK38 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK39 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK40 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK41 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK42 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK43 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK44 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK45 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK46 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK47 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK48 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK49 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 18,900 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK50 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 10,000 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK51 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 10,000 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK52 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 10,000 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK53 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 10,000 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK54 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 10,000 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK55 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 10,000 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK56 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 10,000 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK57 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 10,000 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK58 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 10,000 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK59 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 10,000 gal T79 Incinerator 

Building T146 – Tank Module: 

T146-TK01 Solvent Tank RTO 19,500 gal RTO 

T146-TK02 Solvent Tank RTO 19,500 gal RTO 

T146-TK03 Solvent Tank RTO 19,500 gal RTO 

T146-TK04 Solvent Tank RTO 19,500 gal RTO 

T146-TK05 Solvent Tank RTO 19,500 gal RTO 

T146-TK06 Solvent Tank RTO 19,500 gal RTO 

T146-TK07 Solvent Tank RTO 19,500 gal RTO 

T146-TK08 Solvent Tank RTO 19,500 gal RTO 

T146-TK09 Solvent Tank RTO 19,500 gal RTO 

T146-TK10 Solvent Tank RTO 19,500 gal RTO 

T146-TK13 Solvent Tank RTO 19,000 gal RTO 

T146-TK14 Solvent Tank RTO 19,000 gal RTO 

T146-TK15 Solvent Tank RTO 19,000 gal RTO 

T146-TK16 Solvent Tank RTO 19,000 gal RTO 

T146-TK17 Solvent Tank RTO 19,000 gal RTO 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 84 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Emission 

Unit ID Emission Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity 

Control 

Device 

T146-TK18 Solvent Tank RTO 19,000 gal RTO 

T146-TK19 Solvent Tank RTO 19,000 gal RTO 

T146-TK22 Solvent Tank RTO 19,000 gal RTO 

Building T64: 

T64-TK2 Phenol Storage Tank RTO 10,000 gal RTO 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.9.1 Standards for BPM Solvent Storage Tanks [40 CFR 63.1253(c)(1)(i), 40 CFR 60.112b and 

60.113b, 326 IAC 8-5-3, and 326 IAC 2-2] 

The following streamlined standards for the BPM solvent storage tanks satisfy the requirements 

of the Pharmaceutical MACT Standards for storage tanks [40 CFR 63.1253(c)(1)(i)], Volatile 

Organic Liquid Storage Vessel Standards [40 CFR 60.112b and 60.113b], PSD BACT 

requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3] and RACT requirements for synthesized pharmaceutical 

manufacturing operations [326 IAC 8-5-3]: 

(a) Definition Standards: 

(1) A BPM solvent storage tank is defined as any vessel designed to store raw 

material feedstocks or used solvent to be recovered that contain VOCs and/or 

VOHAP. Pressure vessels greater than 204.9 kPa without emissions to the 

atmosphere, vessels attached to motor vehicles, or vessels used to store 

beverage alcohol are not BPM solvent storage tanks. For purposes of 

inspections in Section D.9.1(c), a BPM solvent storage tank includes any fixed 

roof, cover, and/or enclosure, and closed vent system section from the BPM 

solvent storage tank to the inlet of the production building roof fan exhausting to 

the control device or to the BPM solvent storage tank conservation vent. 

(b) Operational Standards: 

(1) Except as otherwise provided in this Condition and in Condition D.9.2, the 

Permittee shall route the vapors from each operating BPM solvent storage tank 

through a closed-vent system to either the RTO control system or the T79 fume 

incinerator control system, which are described in Section D.14 for equipment 

controlled by the RTO control system and described in Section D.15 for 

equipment controlled by the T79 fume incinerator control system. 

 

(2) Solvent storage tanks shall be of fixed-roof design. 

(c) Inspection Standards: 

(1) The Permittee shall conduct one-time Method 21 inspections of the fixed roof for 

each existing BPM solvent storage tank not operated under negative pressure 

and not already subject to LDAR within 150 days of the issuance date of this 

permit, and for each new BPM solvent storage tank not operated under negative 

pressure and not subject to LDAR within 150 days upon startup. 

(2) The Permittee shall conduct semiannual visual inspections on each BPM solvent 

storage tank for visible, audible, or olfactory indications of leaks. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 85 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(3) The Permittee shall initiate repair of any leak on a BPM solvent storage tank no 

later than 5 calendar days after identification, and complete the repair within 15 

days after identification, unless: 

(i) The repair is technically infeasible without a shutdown of an operation or 

process; or 

(ii) It is determined that emissions resulting from immediate repair would be 

greater than the fugitive emissions likely to result from delay or repair. 

Repairs delayed due to either of the causes described in (A) or (B) shall be 

completed by the end of the next shutdown. 

D.9.2 Exceptions to Standards for BPM Solvent Storage Tanks [40 CFR 63.1253 and 326 IAC 2-2] 

(a) The BPM solvent storage tanks are not subject to the standards established in Condition 

D.9.1 (b) during periods of planned routine maintenance, as long as the planned routine 

maintenance activities do not exceed 240 hours per 365 day period. 

(b) BPM solvent storage tanks storing VOC/VOHAP with a vapor pressure less than 3.5 kPa 

are not subject to the requirements of D.9.1 (b)(1) and (c). 

(c) BPM solvent storage tanks that are unsafe or difficult to inspect are not subject to the 

requirements of D.9.1(c). 

D.9.3 Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) Standards [40 CFR 63.1255 and 326 IAC 2-2] 

The LDAR standards that apply to components associated with the emission units listed in this 

section are described in Section E.1 of this permit. 

D.9.4 Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Requirements [40 CFR 63.1259(a)(3), 326 IAC 2-2-3, 40 CFR 

63.6(e) and 40 CFR 63.8(c)] 

The NESHAP General Provisions for Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction (SSM) Plans [40 CFR 

63.6(e) and 63.8(c)] shall be used to satisfy the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 

63.1259(a)(3)], and PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11]. 

(a) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3), the Permittee shall develop an SSM Plan to ensure that 

processes are operated and maintained in a manner which satisfies the general duty to 

minimize emissions established by 40 CFR 63.6(e)(1)(i), and that all malfunctions are 

corrected as soon as practicable after their occurrence in order to minimize excess 

emissions. The SSM Plan shall contain the following information: 

(1) Detailed plans and/or procedures for operating and maintaining the process 

during periods of SSM; and 

(2) Corrective action program for malfunctioning processes. 

(b) The startup, shutdown and malfunction (SSM) requirements for the RTO control system 

or T79 control system, are described in Sections D.14 and D.15 of this permit, 

respectively. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 86 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Testing and Monitoring Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-6(1) (6)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.9.5 Requirements 

The requirements for the RTO control system and T79 fume incinerator control system, and 

associated closed-vent systems that control emissions from the emission units listed in this 

section are described in Sections D.14 and D.15 of this permit, respectively. 

D.9.6 Monitoring Requirements 

The monitoring requirements for the RTO control system, T79 fume incinerator control system, 

and associated closed-vent systems that control emissions from the emission units listed in this 

section are described in Sections D.14 and D.15 of this permit, respectively. 

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-10.5, 326 IAC 2-7-12, 326 IAC 2-2, 40 

CFR 60.7, 40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb, and 40 CFR 63 Subpart GGG] 

D.9.7 Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements 

(a) Record Keeping Requirements 

(1) The record keeping requirements for the RTO control system, T79 fume 

incinerator control system, and associated closed-vent systems that control 

emissions from the emission units listed in this section are described in Sections 

D.14 and D.15 of this permit, respectively. 

(2) Inspection and Maintenance Records - The Permittee shall maintain the following 

records: 

(A) Identification and explanation of all BPM solvent storage tanks unsafe to 

inspect, including a plan for when these tanks will be inspected; 

(B) Identification and explanation of all BPM solvent storage tanks difficult to 

inspect, including a plan for when these tanks will be inspected; 

(C) Visual inspection log of BPM solvent storage tanks, including the date of 

inspection and a statement that no leaks were detected, if applicable; 

(D) One-time Method 21 inspection log of each BPM solvent storage tank, 

including the date of inspection and a statement that no leaks were 

detected, if applicable; 

(E) Information on each BPM solvent storage tank inspection during which a 

leak is detected, including: 

(i) Instrument identification numbers, operator name or initials, and 

identification of the equipment; 

(ii) Date the leak was detected and the date of the first attempt to 

repair the leak; 

(iii) Maximum instrument reading measured after leak is successfully 

repaired or determined to be nonrepairable; 

(iv) Reason for any delay of repair if leak not repaired within 15 

calendar days after discovery of the leak; 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 87 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(v) Name, initials, or other form of identification of person whose 

decision it was that repair could not be affected without a 

shutdown; 

(vi) Expected date of successful repair of leak if leak not required 

within 15 calendar days after discovery of leak; 

(vii) Dates of shutdowns that occur while the equipment is 

unrepaired; and 

(viii) Date of successful repair of the leak. 

(F) Periods of planned routine maintenance; and 

(G) Records of BPM solvent storage tanks storing VOC/VOHAP with a vapor 

pressure less than 3.5 kPa. 

(3) SSM Records - The Permittee shall maintain the following records: 

(A) Records of the current and superseded versions of SSM Plan. 

(B) Occurrence/duration records of each process malfunction. 

(C) Information to demonstrate conformance with each SSM is consistent 

with the procedures in the SSM Plan. 

(D) Records of actions taken during each SSM when different from SSM 

Plan. 

(4) LDAR Records - The record keeping requirements for the LDAR standards are 

described in Section E.1 of this permit. 

(5) Storage Tank Records - Pursuant to New Source Performance Standard for 

Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels (40 CFR 60.116b(a) and (b)), the 

Permittee shall, for the life of the source, keep readily accessible records of the 

dimensions and capacity for each BPM solvent storage tank. 

(6) Operating Plan – Pursuant to 40 CFR 60.115b, the Permittee shall, for the life of 

the source, maintain a copy of the operating plan required by 40 CFR 60.113b for 

all tanks with design capacity greater than or equal to 75 cubic meters. 

(b) Periodic Reporting Requirements 

(1) The following streamlined quarterly reporting requirements shall satisfy the 

Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1256(b)] and the PSD BACT 

requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11]: 

(A) Semiannual visual inspections conducted during which a leak was 

detected; 

(B) Periods of planned routine maintenance; and 

(C) SSM summary reports for the processes. 

(D) The reporting requirements for the RTO control system, T79 fume 

incinerator control system, and associated closed-vent systems that 

control emissions from the emission units listed in this section are 

described in Sections D.14 and D.15 of this permit, respectively. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 88 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(E) The reporting requirements for the LDAR standards are described in 

Section E of this permit. 

(c) Immediate Reporting Requirements 

The reporting requirements in the NESHAP General Provisions for Startup, Shutdown 

and Malfunction (SSM) Plans [40 CFR 63.6(e)(3)] shall be used to satisfy the reporting 

requirements under the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1259(a)(3)] and 

PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11]. 

(1) Any time an action taken by the Permittee during an SSM event of the process is 

not consistent with the procedures specified in the SSM Plan, the Permittee shall 

report the actions taken for that event. The immediate report shall be submitted 

to the agency via a telephone call or facsimile within 2 working days after 

commencing actions inconsistent with the plan. 

(2) Within 7 working days after the end of an SSM event of the process where an 

action taken by the Permittee is not consistent with the procedures specified in 

the SSM Plan, the Permittee shall submit a letter containing the following 

information in accordance with 40 CFR 63.10(d)(5): 

(A) Name, title and signature of responsible official certifying accuracy; 

(B) Explanation of the circumstances for the event; 

(C) Reason for not following the SSM Plan; and 

(D) Report any excess emissions and/or parameter monitoring exceedances 

are believed to have occurred. 

Modifications and Construction Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-10.5, 326 IAC 2-7-12 and 326 IAC 2-2] 

D.9.8 Modifications and Construction: Advance approval of permit conditions 

(a) The Permittee may modify any existing emission units listed in this section of the permit 

without obtaining a source modification approval (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-

10.5), a Title V permit modification (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-2), 

provided the modified emission units are subject to the same applicable requirements 

listed in this D section, and the Permittee shall comply with the Change Management and 

Flexible Permit provisions in Section F.1 of this permit. 

(b) The Permittee may construct and install new emission units of the types described in this 

D section without obtaining a source modification approval (otherwise required by 326 

IAC 2-7-10.5), a Title V permit modification (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit (otherwise required by and 326 IAC 2-2), 

provided the new emission units are subject to the same applicable requirements listed in 

this D section, and the Permittee shall comply with the Change Management and Flexible 

Permit provisions in Section F.1 of this permit. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 89 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION D.10 BPM SUPPORT OPERATIONS – WASTE TANK CONDITIONS

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The information describing the processes contained in the following facility description boxes is 

descriptive information and does not constitute enforceable conditions: 

Emission 

Unit ID 

Emission Unit 

Description Stack/Vent Nominal 

Capacity 

Control 

Device 

Building T27: 

T27-TK53-10* Waste Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

Building T28: 

T28-TK-28HW* Waste Tank RTO 250 gal RTO 

Building T29: 

T29-TK7902* Waste Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

Building T31:

T31-TK609* Waste Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

T31-TK669* Waste Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

Building T31A:

T31A-TK451K* Waste Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

T31A-TK688* Waste Tank RTO 125 gal RTO 

Building T99:

T99-TK-1B* Waste Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

T99-TK-7B* Waste Tank RTO 210 gal RTO 

T99-TK-8B* Waste Tank RTO 210 gal RTO 

T99-TK-D45A* Waste Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

Building T100:

T100-TK-10A* Waste Tank RTO 200 gal RTO 

T100-TK-48* Waste Tank RTO 3300 gal RTO 

Building T79:

T79-TK301* Equalization Tank T79 - 321 stream 50,000 gal T79 Incinerator 

T79-TK302* Equalization Tank T79 - 321 stream 50,000 gal T79 Incinerator 

T79-TK303* Neutralization Tank T79 - 321 stream 5,000 gal T79 Incinerator 

Building T102-RTOs 

T102-TK102* 90 day RCRA Tank RTO 200 gal RTO 

Tank Module Building T140:

T140-TK3122 Waste Tank T79 Incinerator 38,425 gal T79 Incinerator 

T140-TK3123 Waste Tank T79 Incinerator 38,425 gal T79 Incinerator 

T140-TK3124 Waste Tank T79 Incinerator 38,425 gal T79 Incinerator 

T140-TK3125 Waste Tank T79 Incinerator 38,425 gal T79 Incinerator 

T140-TK3126 Waste Tank T79 Incinerator 38,425 gal T79 Incinerator 

T140-TK3227* Waste Tank T79 -324 stream 18,130 gal T79 Incinerator 

T140-TK3228* Waste Tank T79 - 324 stream 18,130 gal T79 Incinerator 

T140-TK3229* Waste Tank T79 - 324 stream 500 gal T79 Incinerator 

Tank Module Building T142: 

T142-TK01 Waste Tank T79 or RTO 19,500 gal T79 or RTO 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 90 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Emission 

Unit ID 

Emission Unit 

Description Stack/Vent Nominal 

Capacity 

Control 

Device 

T142-TK02 Waste Tank T79 or RTO 19,500 gal T79 or RTO 

T142-TK03 Waste Tank T79 or RTO 19,500 gal T79 or RTO 

T142-TK04 Waste Tank T79 or RTO 19,500 gal T79 or RTO 

T142-TK05 Waste Tank T79 or RTO 19,500 gal T79 or RTO 

T142-TK06 Waste Tank T79 or RTO 19,500 gal T79 or RTO 

T142-TK07 Waste Tank T79 or RTO 19,500 gal T79 or RTO 

T142-TK08 Waste Tank T79 or RTO 19,500 gal T79 or RTO 

T142-TK09 Waste Tank T79 or RTO 19,500 gal T79 or RTO 

T142-TK10 Waste Tank T79 or RTO 19,500 gal T79 or RTO 

T142-TK11 Waste Tank T79 or RTO 19,500 gal T79 or RTO 

T142-TK12 Waste Tank T79 or RTO 19,500 gal T79 or RTO 

Tank Module Building T143: 

T143-TK02* Waste Tank T79 - 325 stream 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK06* Waste Tank T79 - 325 stream 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK10* Waste Tank T79 - 325 stream 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK15* Waste Tank T79 - 325 stream 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK16 Waste Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK56* Knock Out Pot T79 Incinerator 45 gal T79 Incinerator 

Tank Module Building T145:

T145-TK76* Knock Out Pot T79 Incinerator 45 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK77* Knock Out Pot T79 Incinerator 45 gal T79 Incinerator 

Tank Module Building T146: 

T146-TK23 Waste Tank RTO 19,000 gal RTO 

T146-TK24 Waste Tank RTO 19,000 gal RTO 

T146-TK11* Waste Tank RTO 18,644 gal RTO 

T146-TK20* Waste Tank RTO 18,644 gal RTO 

T146-TK21* Waste Tank RTO 18,644 gal RTO 

T146-TK12 Waste Tank RTO 19,500 gal RTO 

T146-TK56* Knock Out Pot RTO 45 gal RTO 

T48 Tank Farm: 

T48-TK3207* Waste Tank T79 - 324 stream 102,759 gal T79 Incinerator 

T48-TK3208* Waste Tank T79 - 324 stream 102,759 gal T79 Incinerator 

T48-TK3209* Waste Tank T79 - 324 stream 102,759 gal T79 Incinerator 

T48-TK3211* Waste Tank T79 - 324 stream 260,650 gal T79 Incinerator 

T48-TK3212* Waste Tank T79 - 324 stream 260,650 gal T79 Incinerator 

* Emission units marked with an asterisk are insignificant activities as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(21)(A)-(C). 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 91 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.10.1 Standards for BPM Waste Storage Tanks [40 CFR 63.1256(b), 40 CFR 63.685, 40 CFR 60.110b, 

326 IAC 2-2-3, and 326 IAC 8-5-3] 

The following streamlined standards for BPM waste storage tanks satisfy the requirements of the 

Pharmaceutical MACT Standards for wastewater tanks [40 CFR 63.1256(b)], Volatile Organic 

Liquid Storage Vessel Standards [40 CFR 60.110b], OSWRO MACT Standards for waste tanks 

[40 CFR 63.685], PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3], and RACT requirements for 

synthesized pharmaceutical manufacturing operations [326 IAC 8-5-3]: 

(a) Definition Standards: 

(1) A BPM waste storage tank is defined as any waste management unit that is 

designed to contain an accumulation of waste material containing VOCs and/or 

VOHAP. Pressure vessels greater than 204.9 kPa without emissions to the 

atmosphere or vessels attached to motor vehicles are not BPM waste storage 

tanks. For purposes of inspections in Section D.10.1(c), BPM waste storage tank 

includes any fixed roof, cover, and/or enclosure, and closed vent system section 

from the BPM waste storage tank to the inlet of the production building roof fan 

exhausting to the control device or to the BPM waste storage tank conservation 

vent. 

(b) Operational Standards: 

(1) Except as otherwise provided in this Condition and in Condition D.10.2, the 

Permittee shall route the vapors from each operating BPM waste storage tank 

through a closed-vent system to either the RTO control system or the T79 fume 

incinerator control system, which are described in Section D.14 for equipment 

controlled by the RTO control system and described in Section D.15 for 

equipment controlled by the T79 fume incinerator control system. 

(2) BPM waste storage tanks shall be of fixed-roof design. 

(c) Inspection Standards: 

(1) The Permittee shall conduct one-time Method 21 inspections on each new fixed 

roof BPM waste storage tank not operated under negative pressure and not 

subject to LDAR within 150 days upon startup. 

(2) The Permittee shall conduct semiannual visual inspections on the fixed roof and 

all openings of each BPM waste storage tank for visible, audible, or olfactory 

indications of leaks. 

(3) The Permittee shall initiate repair of any leak on a BPM waste storage tank no 

later than 5 calendar days after identification, and complete the repair within 15 

days after identification, unless: 

(A) The repair is technically infeasible without a shutdown of an operation or 

process; or 

(B) It is determined that emissions resulting from immediate repair would be 

greater than the fugitive emissions likely to result from delay or repair. 

Repairs delayed due to either of the causes described in (A) or (B) shall 

be completed by the end of the next shutdown. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 92 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

D.10.2 Exceptions to Standards for BPM Waste Storage Tanks [40 CFR 63.1256(b), 40 CFR 63, and 

326 IAC 2-2-3] 

(a) The BPM waste storage tanks less than 38 cubic meters are not subject to the standards 

established in Condition D.10.1 (b) during periods of planned routine maintenance, as 

long as the planned routine maintenance activities do not exceed 240 hours per 365 day 

period. 

(b) BPM waste storage tanks storing VOC/VOHAP with a vapor pressure less than 3.5 kPa 

are not subject to the requirements of D.10.1 (b)(1) and (c). 

(c) BPM waste storage tanks that are unsafe or difficult to inspect are not subject to the 

requirements of D.10.1(c). 

D.10.3 Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) Standards [40 CFR 61, Subpart V and 326 IAC 2-2-3] 

The LDAR standards that apply to components associated with the BPM waste storage tanks are 

described in Section E.2 of this permit. 

D.10.4 Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Requirements [40 CFR 63.1259(a)(3), 40 CFR 63.697(b)(3), 

326 IAC 2-2-3, 40 CFR 63.6(e) and 40 CFR 63.8(c)] 

The NESHAP General Provisions for Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction (SSM) Plans [40 CFR 

63.6(e) and 63.8(c)] shall be used to satisfy the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 

63.1259(a)(3)], Offsite Waste MACT [40 CFR 63.697(b)(3)], and PSD BACT requirements [326 

IAC 2-1.1-11]. 

(a) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3), the Permittee shall develop an SSM Plan to ensure that 

processes are operated and maintained in a manner which satisfies the general duty to 

minimize emissions established by 40 CFR 63.6(e)(1)(i), and that all malfunctions are 

corrected as soon as practicable after their occurrence in order to minimize excess 

emissions. The SSM Plan shall contain the following information: 

(1) Detailed plans and/or procedures for operating and maintaining the process 

during periods of SSM; and 

(2) Corrective action program for malfunctioning processes. 

(b) The startup, shutdown and malfunction (SSM) requirements for the RTO control system 

or T79 control system, via its associated closed vent system, are described in Sections 

D.14 and D.15 of this permit, respectively. 

Testing and Monitoring Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-6(1) (6)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.10.5 Requirements 

The requirements for the RTO control system and T79 fume incinerator control system, and 

associated closed-vent systems, used to control emissions from the emission units listed in this 

section are described in Sections D.14 and D.15 of this permit, respectively. 

D.10.6 Monitoring Requirements 

The monitoring requirements for the RTO control system and T79 fume incinerator control system 

used to control emissions from the emission units listed in this section are described in Sections 

D.14 and D.15 of this permit, respectively. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 93 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-10.5, 326 IAC 2-7-12, 326 IAC 2-2, 40 

CFR 60.7, 40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb, 40 CFR 63 Subpart DD, and 40 CFR 63 Subpart GGG] 

D.10.7 Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements 

(a) Record Keeping Requirements 

(1) RTO Control System and T79 Control System Records - The record keeping 

requirements for the RTO control system and T79 fume incinerator control 

system used to control emissions from these emission units are described in 

Sections D.14 and D.15 of this permit, respectively. 

(2) Inspection and Maintenance Records - The Permittee shall maintain the following 

records: 

(A) Identification and explanation of all BPM waste storage tanks unsafe to 

inspect, including a plan for when these tanks will be inspected; 

(B) Identification and explanation of all BPM waste storage tanks difficult to 

inspect, including a plan for when these tanks will be inspected; 

(C) Visual inspection log of BPM waste storage tanks, including the date of 

inspection and a statement that no leaks were detected, if applicable; 

(D) One-time Method 21 inspection log of each BPM waste storage tank, 

including the date of inspection and a statement that no leaks were 

detected, if applicable; 

(E) Information on each BPM waste storage tank inspection during which a 

leak is detected, including: 

(i) Instrument identification numbers, operator name or initials, and 

identification of the equipment; 

(ii) Date the leak was detected and the date of the first attempt to 

repair the leak; 

(iii) Maximum instrument reading measured after leak is successfully 

repaired or determined to be nonrepairable; 

(iv) Reason for any delay of repair if leak not repaired within 15 

calendar days after discovery of the leak; 

(v) Name, initials, or other form of identification of person whose 

decision it was that repair could not be effected without a 

shutdown; 

(vi) Expected date of successful repair of leak if leak not required 

within 15 calendar days after discovery of leak; 

(vii) Dates of shutdowns that occur while the equipment is 

unrepaired; and 

(viii) Date of successful repair of the leak. 

(F) Periods of planned routine maintenance; and 

(G) Records of BPM waste storage tanks storing VOC/VOHAP with a vapor 

pressure less than 3.5 kPa. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 94 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(3) SSM Records - The Permittee shall maintain the following records: 

(A) Records of the current and superseded versions of SSM Plan. 

(B) Occurrence/duration records of each process malfunction. 

(C) Information to demonstrate conformance with each SSM are consistent 

wit the procedures in the SSM Plan. 

(D) Records of actions taken during each SSM when different from SSM 

Plan. 

(4) LDAR Records - The record keeping requirements for the LDAR standards are 

described in Section E of this permit. 

(5) Storage Tank Records - Pursuant to New Source Performance Standard for 

Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels (40 CFR 60.116b(a) and (b)), the 

Permittee shall, for the life of the source, keep readily accessible records of the 

dimensions and capacity for all applicable BPM waste storage tanks. 

(6) Operating Plan – Pursuant to 40 CFR 60.115b, the Permittee shall, for the life of 

the source, maintain a copy of the operating plan required by 40 CFR 60.113b for 

all tanks with design capacity greater than or equal to 75 cubic meters. 

(b) Quarterly Reporting Requirements 

(1) The following streamlined quarterly reporting requirements shall satisfy the 

Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1256(b)] and the PSD BACT 

requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11]: 

(A) Inspections conducted during which a leak was detected; 

(B) Periods of planned routine maintenance; and 

(C) SSM summary reports for the processes. 

(D) The reporting requirements for the RTO control system and T79 fume 

incinerator control system used to control emissions from these emission 

units are described in Sections D.14 and D.15 of this permit, 

respectively. 

(E) The reporting requirements for the LDAR standards are described in 

Section E of this permit. 

(c) Immediate Reporting Requirements 

The reporting requirements in the NESHAP General Provisions for Startup, Shutdown 

and Malfunction (SSM) Plans [40 CFR 63.6(e)(3)] shall be used to satisfy the reporting 

requirements under the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1259(a)(3)], Offsite 

Waste MACT standards [40 CFR 63.697(b)(3), and PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-

1.1-11]. 

(1) Any time an action taken by the Permittee during an SSM event of a process is 

not consistent with the procedures specified in the SSM Plan, the Permittee shall 

report the actions taken for that event. The immediate report shall be submitted 

to the agency via a telephone call or facsimile within 2 working days after 

commencing actions inconsistent with the plan. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 95 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(2) Within 7 working days after the end of an SSM event of a process where an 

action taken by the Permittee is not consistent with the procedures specified in 

the SSM Plan, the Permittee shall submit a letter containing the following 

information in accordance with 40 CFR 63.10(d)(5): 

(A) Name, title and signature of responsible official certifying accuracy; 

(B) Explanation of the circumstances for the event; 

(C) Reason for not following the SSM Plan; and 

(D) Report any excess emissions and/or parameter monitoring exceedances 

are believed to have occurred. 

Modifications and Construction Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-10.5, 326 IAC 2-7-12 and 326 IAC 2-2] 

D.10.8 Modifications and Construction: Advance approval of permit conditions 

(a) The Permittee may modify any existing emission units listed in this section of the permit 

without obtaining a source modification approval (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-

10.5), a Title V permit modification (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-2), 

provided the modified emission units are subject to the same applicable requirements 

listed in this D section, and the Permittee shall comply with the Change Management and 

Flexible Permit provisions in Section F.1 of this permit. 

(b) The Permittee may construct and install new emission units of the types described in this 

D section without obtaining a source modification approval (otherwise required by 326 

IAC 2-7-10.5), a Title V permit modification (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-2), 

provided the new emission units are subject to the same applicable requirements listed in 

this D section, and the Permittee shall comply with the Change Management and Flexible 

Permit provisions in Section F.1 of this permit. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 96 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION D.11 BPM SUPPORT OPERATIONS – WASTE CONTAINER CONDITIONS 

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The information describing the processes contained in the following facility description boxes is 

descriptive information and does not constitute enforceable conditions: 

Emission 

Unit ID Emission Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity 

Control 

Device 

SMALL BPM WASTE CONTAINERS*: 

A small BPM waste container, such as a drum, is defined as containing VOC/VOHAP and having a 

capacity greater than 0.1 cubic meters (26.4 gallons) and equal to or less than 0.42 cubic meters 

(110.5 gallons). Identification of these types of containers have not been individually listed given they 

are portable and continually change. Each onsite wastewater container and offsite waste container 

with this description type will follow the compliance requirements outlined in this section. 

 

LARGE BPM WASTE CONTAINERS*: 

A large BPM waste container, such as tanker or melon, is defined as containing VOC/VOHAP and 

having a capacity greater than 0.42 cubic meters (110.5 gallons). Identification of these types of 

containers have not been individually listed given they are portable and continually change. Each 

container with this description type will follow the compliance requirements outlined in this section. 

* Emission units marked with an asterisk are insignificant activities as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(21)(A)-(C). 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.11.1 Standards for Small BPM Waste Containers [40 CFR 63.1256(d), 40 CFR 63.688, 326 IAC 2-2-3] 

The following streamlined standards for small BPM waste containers satisfy the requirements of 

the Pharmaceutical MACT Standards for wastewater containers [40 CFR 63.1256(d)], OSWRO 

MACT Standards for waste containers [40 CFR 63.688], and PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 

2-2-3]: 

(a) Definition Standards: 

(1) A small BPM waste container is defined as any portable unit containing 

VOC/VOHAP material at concentrations greater than 500 ppmw with a storage 

capacity of greater than 0.1 cubic meters (26.4 gallons) and less than or equal to 

0.42 cubic meters (110.5 gallons). 

(b) Operational Standards: 

(1) The cover and all openings on each BPM waste container shall be maintained in 

the closed position, except when adding material, removing material, accessing 

material for non-transfer-related routine activities, openings caused from a 

pressure relief device, or opening of a safety device. 

(2) Each BPM waste container containing VOC/VOHAP shall meet existing 

Department of Transportation (DOT) specifications and testing requirements 

under 49 CFR 178. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 97 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(c) Inspection Standards: 

(1) Initial and semiannual visual inspections shall be conducted for improper work 

practices and control equipment failures. 

(2) Inspections that are unsafe or difficult to inspect are not subject to the inspection 

requirements of D.11.1(c)(1). 

(3) The Permittee shall attempt to repair any defect within 24 hours after detection of 

the defective container and complete the repair within 5 calendar days after 

detection. If repair of a defect cannot be completed within 5 calendar days, then 

the waste shall be removed from the container and the container shall not be 

used to manage waste until the defect is repaired. 

D.11.2 Standards for Large BPM Waste Containers [40 CFR 63.1256(d), 40 CFR 63.688, 326 IAC 2-2-3, 

326 IAC 2-7-24] 

The following standards represent the streamlined requirements of the Pharmaceutical MACT 

Standards under 40 CFR 63.1256(d), OSWRO MACT Standards under 40 CFR 63.688, and Best 

Available Control Technology (BACT) requirements under 326 IAC 2-2-3: 

(a) Definition Standards: 

(1) A large BPM waste container is defined as any portable unit containing 

VOC/VOHAP material at concentrations greater than 500 ppmw with a storage 

capacity of greater than 0.42 cubic meters (110.5 gallons). 

(b) Operational Standards: 

(1) The cover and all openings on each large BPM waste container shall be 

maintained in the closed position, and without leaks, except when adding 

material, removing material, accessing material for non-transfer-related routine 

activities, opening from a pressure relief device, and opening of a safety device. 

(2) A submerged fill pipe shall be used when pumping BPM liquid waste into a large 

BPM waste container. The submerged fill pipe outlet shall extend to no more 

than 6 inches or within two fill pipe diameters of the bottom of the container while 

the container is being filled. 

(c) Inspection Standards: 

(1) One-time Method 21 inspections shall be conducted on each new large BPM 

waste container within 150 days upon first onsite usage. 

(2) Initial and semiannual visual inspections shall be conducted for: 

(A) Improper work practices; 

(B) Control equipment failures; and 

(C) Visible, audible, or olfactory indications of leaks. 

(3) Inspections that are unsafe or difficult to inspect are not subject to the inspection 

requirements of D.11.2(c)(1) and (2). 

(4) The Permittee shall attempt to repair any defect within 24 hours after detection of 

the defective container and complete the repair within 5 calendar days after 

detection. If repair of a defect cannot be completed within 5 calendar days, then 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 98 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

the waste shall be removed from the container and the container shall not be 

used to manage waste until the defect is repaired. 

 

 (d) The LDAR standards that apply to the components associated with the emission units 

listed in this section are described in Section E.2. 

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-10.5, 326 IAC 2-7-12 and 326 IAC 2-2] 

D.11.3 Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements

(a) Record Keeping Requirements 

(1) The Permittee shall maintain the following records for inspections required by 

Conditions D.11.1 and D.11.2: 

(A) Identification and explanation of all containers unsafe to inspect, 

including a plan for when these containers will be inspected; 

(B) Identification and explanation of all containers difficult to inspect, 

including a plan for when these containers will be inspected; 

(C) Visual inspection log of BPM waste containers, including the date of 

inspection and a statement that no leaks were detected, if applicable; 

(D) One-time Method 21 inspection log of each large BPM waste container, 

including the date of inspection and a statement that no leaks were 

detected, if applicable; 

(E) Information on each BPM waste container inspection during which a leak 

is detected, including: 

(i) Instrument identification numbers (for Method 21 inspections 

only), operator name or initials, and identification of the 

equipment; 

(ii) Date the leak was detected and the date of the first attempt to 

repair the leak; and 

(iii) Date of successful repair of the leak or date material removed 

from container. 

(b) Quarterly Reporting Requirements 

(1) The Permittee shall include the inspection records specified in D.11.3 (a)(5) for 

each inspection conducted during which a leak was detected in the next quarterly 

report. 

Modifications and Construction Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-10.5, 326 IAC 2-7-12 and 326 IAC 2-2] 

D.11.4 Modifications and Construction: Advance Approval of Permit Conditions

(a) The Permittee may modify any existing emission units listed in this section of the permit 

without obtaining a source modification approval (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-

10.5), a Title V permit modification (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-2), 

provided the modified emission units are subject to the same applicable requirements 

listed in this D section, and the Permittee shall comply with the Change Management and 

Flexible Permit provisions in Section F.1 of this permit. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 99 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(b) The Permittee may construct and install new emission units of the types described in this 

D section without obtaining a source modification approval (otherwise required by 326 

IAC 2-7-10.5), a Title V permit modification (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-2), 

provided the new emission units are subject to the same applicable requirements listed in 

this D section, and the Permittee shall comply with the Change Management and Flexible 

Permit provisions in Section F.1 of this permit. 

The remainder of the page is left blank intentionally. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 100 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION D.12 T49 LIQUID WASTE INCINERATOR, INCLUDING ASSOCIATED AIR POLLUTION 

CONTROL EQUIPMENT AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS 

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The information describing the processes contained in the following facility description box is descriptive 

information and does not constitute enforceable conditions: 

Emission Unit Description Building Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity Control Device 

T49 Liquid Waste Incinerator T49 T49 Stack 75 MMBtu/hr Condenser/Absorber; 

Hydro-SonicTM Scrubber 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.12.1 General Applicability Requirements with Emission Standards [326 IAC 2-2-3 and 40 CFR 63, 

Subparts DD and EEE] 

(a) Pursuant to the Hazardous Waste Combustor (HWC) MACT Standards [40 CFR 

63.1206(b)(1)(i)] and the PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3], the emission 

standards and operating requirements shall apply as specified in Conditions D.12.2, 

D.12.3, D.12.4, D.12.5, D.12.6, and D.12.7 except during periods of startup, shutdown, 

and malfunction. 

(b) Pursuant to the Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations MACT Standards [40 CFR 

63.684(b)(5)(i)], the T49 liquid waste incinerator shall have a permit issued under 40 CFR 

270 whenever off-site waste material is treated and destroyed in the T49 liquid waste 

incinerator. The incinerator shall operate in accordance with the HWC MACT standards 

under 40 CFR 63, Subpart EEE. 

(c) Pursuant to the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1206(b)(5)(ii) and (iii)] and the PSD 

requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3], the Permittee may make a change in the design, 

operation, or maintenance practices documented in the comprehensive performance test 

plan (CPT plan), Documentation of Compliance (DOC), Notification of Compliance 

(NOC), or startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan (SSM plan), as long as the Permittee 

complies with the following requirements: 

(1) If it is determined that the change may adversely affect compliance with any 

emission standard, the Permittee shall comply with the requirements specified in 

40 CFR 63.1206(b)(5)(i) prior to implementing the change(s). 

(2) If it is determined that the change will not adversely affect compliance with the 

emission standards of this condition, the Permittee may implement the change(s) 

but must revise as necessary the performance test plan, DOC, NOC, and SSM 

plan, to reflect the change(s). 

D.12.2 Particulate Matter Emission Standards [40 CFR 63.1203 and 326 IAC 4-2] 

In order to satisfy the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1203(a)(7)], the particulate matter (PM) 

emissions from the T49 liquid waste incinerator stack exhaust shall not exceed 34 milligrams per 

dry standard cubic meter (mg/dscm) (0.015 grains per dry standard cubic feet (gr/dscf)), 

corrected to 7 percent oxygen. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 101 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

D.12.3 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Emission Standards [326 IAC 2-2-3] 

In order to satisfy the PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3], the T49 liquid waste incinerator 

shall be equipped with a caustic scrubber system to control SO2 emissions. The SO2 emissions 

from the incinerator stack exhaust shall not exceed 500 ppmv dry corrected to 7% oxygen, 

averaged over a 24-hour daily period when burning waste streams. This facility is not subject to 

emission limitations and standards in 326 IAC 7 because the incinerator does not have the 

capability to burn fuel oil. 

D.12.4 Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) Emission Standards [326 IAC 2-2-3] 

In order to satisfy the PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3], the T49 liquid waste incinerator 

shall implement good combustion practices to control NOx emissions. The NOx emissions from 

the incinerator stack exhaust shall not exceed 975 ppmv dry corrected to 7% oxygen, expressed 

as NO2, averaged over a 24-hour daily period when burning waste streams. 

D.12.5 Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP) and Fluoride Emission Standards [40 CFR 63.1203 and 326 IAC 

2-2-3] 

Except for periods of startup, shutdown and malfunction, the following emission standards shall 

apply at all times the T49 liquid waste incinerator is operating: 

(a) Mercury – In order to satisfy the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1203(a)(2)], the 

mercury emissions from the T49 liquid waste incinerator stack exhaust shall not exceed 

130 ug/dscm, corrected to 7% oxygen. 

(b) Lead and Cadmium – In order to satisfy the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 

63.1203(a)(3)], the total semi-volatile metals (lead and cadmium) emissions from the T49 

liquid waste incinerator stack exhaust shall not exceed 240 ug/dscm, corrected to 7% 

oxygen. 

(c) Arsenic, Beryllium, and Chromium – In order to satisfy the HWC MACT standards [40 

CFR 63.1203(a)(4)], the total low volatile metals (arsenic, beryllium, and chromium) 

emissions from the T49 liquid waste incinerator stack exhaust shall not exceed 97 

ug/dscm, corrected to 7 percent oxygen. 

(d) Hydrochloric Acid/Chlorine Gas (HCl/Cl2) and Fluorides – In order to satisfy the HWC 

MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1203(a)(6)], the HCl/Cl2 emissions from the T49 liquid 

waste incinerator stack exhaust shall not exceed 77 ppmv dry corrected to 7% oxygen, 

expressed as HCl equivalent. In order to satisfy the PSD BACT requirements for 

fluorides [326 IAC 2-2-3], the T49 liquid waste incinerator control system shall achieve an 

HCl control efficiency of 98% or greater. 

(e) Dioxin/Furans – In order to satisfy HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1203(a)(1)], the 

dioxin/furan emissions from the T49 liquid waste incinerator stack exhaust shall not 

exceed 0.40 ng TEQ/dscm, corrected to 7 percent oxygen. 

(f) Principle Organic Hazardous Constituents (POHCs) – In order to satisfy the HWC MACT 

standards [40 CFR 63.1203(c)(1) and (2)], the Permittee shall comply with the following 

requirements: 

(1) The destruction and removal efficiency (DRE) for each principle organic 

hazardous constituent (POHC), excluding dioxin-listed hazardous wastes F020, 

F021, F022, F023, F026, or F027 shall be at least 99.99 percent. 

(2) Dioxin-listed hazardous wastes F020, F021, F022, F023, F026, or F027 shall not 

be burned in the T49 liquid waste incinerator. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 102 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(g) Operating Parameter Limits – In order to comply with the NESHAP from Hazardous 

Waste Combustors (HWC) emission limits in this condition, the operating parameters of 

the T49 Incinerator, as established during the performance tests done on August 10 

through 12, 2004, shall not exceed limits described below as maximum limits or fail to 

achieve limits described as minimum limits. 

Operating Parameter Limit Units Averaging 

Period 

Demonstrates 

Compliance for: 

Minimum Atomizing Air 

Media Pressure 60 psig 1-HR RA D.12.5(f) 

Maximum Primary 

Waste Feed Viscosity 460 centipoise NA D.12.5(f) 

Maximum Secondary 

Waste Feed Viscosity 460 centipoise NA D.12.5(f) 

Maximum Primary 

Waste Feed Rate 7,117 lbs/hr 1-HR RA D.12.5(e) D.12.5(f) 

Maximum Secondary 

Waste Feed Rate 18,326 lbs/hr 1-HR RA D.12.5(e) D.12.5(f) 

Minimum Combustion 

Temperature 1,850 o

F 1-HR RA D.12.5(e) 

D.12.5(f) 

Maximum Combustion 

Air Flow Rate 15,022 acfm 1-HR RA 

D.12.5(a) 

D.12.5(b) 

D.12.5(c) 

D.12.5(d) 

D.12.5(e) 

D.12.5(f) 

Maximum Mercury 

Feed Rate 0.0042 lbs/hr 12-hr RA D.12.5(a) 

Maximum Semi-Volatile 

Metals (SVM) Feed 

Rate 

0.21 lbs/hr 12-hr RA D.12.5(b) 

Maximum Low-Volatile 

Metals (LVM) Feed 

Rate 

0.30 lbs/hr 12-hr RA D.12.5(c) 

Maximum Ash Feed 

Rate 1,710 lbs/hr 12-hr RA D.12.2(a) 

Maximum Total 

Chlorine Feed Rate 3,690 lbs/hr 12-hr RA D.12.5(d) 

Minimum 

Condenser/Absorber 

Flow Rate 

600 gpm 1-HR RA 

D.12.5(a) 

D.12.5(b) 

D.12.5(c) 

D.12.5(d) 

Minimum Differential 

Pressure across 

Condenser/Absorber 

0.5 in.w.c 1-HR RA 

D.12.5(a) 

D.12.5(b) 

D.12.5(c) 

D.12.5(d) 

Minimum Hydro-Sonic 

Scrubber Flow Rate 290 gpm 1-HR RA 

D.12.2(a) 

D.12.5(a) 

D.12.5(b) 

D.12.5(c) 

D.12.5(d) 

Minimum Hydro-Sonic 

Equivalent Differential 

Pressure 

75 in.w.c 1-HR RA 

D.12.2(a) 

D.12.5(a) 

D.12.5(b) 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 103 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Operating Parameter Limit Units Averaging 

Period 

Demonstrates 

Compliance for: 

D.12.5(c) 

D.12.5(d) 

Minimum 

Condenser/Absorber 

pH 

4.9 S.U. 1-HR RA D.12.5(d) 

Maximum 

Condenser/Absorber % 

Solids 

3.5 %TDS 12-hr RA 

D.12.2(a) 

D.12.5(a) 

D.12.5(b) 

D.12.5(c) 

D.12.6 Carbon Monoxide (CO) Emission Standards [326 IAC 2-2-3, 326 IAC 9-1, and 40 CFR 63.1203] 

In order to satisfy the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1203(a)(5)(i)] and the PSD BACT 

requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3], the CO emissions from the T49 liquid waste incinerator stack 

exhaust shall not exceed 100 ppmv dry corrected to 7% oxygen, rolled on an hourly basis, at all 

times the incinerator is operating except during periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction. 

D.12.7 Hydrocarbon (HC) and Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Emission Standards [326 IAC 2-2-3 

and 40 CFR 63.1203] 

During the POHC DRE test, the CO emissions shall not exceed an hourly rolling average of 100 

ppmv dry corrected to 7% oxygen (monitored with continuous emissions monitoring system). 

D.12.8 Automatic Waste Feed Cutoff System Requirements [40 CFR 63.1206] 

In order to satisfy the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1206], the Permittee shall operate the 

T49 liquid waste incinerator with a functioning Automatic Waste Feed Cutoff (AWFCO) system 

that meets the requirements of 40 CFR 63.1206(c)(3). 

(a) Except as allowed under (c) of this condition, the AWFCO system shall be operated such 

that it immediately and automatically cuts off the hazardous waste feed when any of the 

following occur at any time: 

(1) An operating parameter is exceeded; 

(2) An emission standard monitored by the CO CEMS is exceeded; 

(3) A span value of any CMS, except a CEMS, is met or exceeded; 

(4) Upon malfunction of a CMS (excluding the NOx and SO2 CEMS) monitoring an 

operating parameter limit or emission level; or 

(5) When any component of the automatic waste feed cutoff system fails. 

(b) During all AWFCO events, the Permittee shall continue to: 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 104 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(1) Duct combustion gases to the air pollution control system while hazardous waste 

remains in the combustion chamber; and 

(2) Monitor the applicable combustor operating parameters and emission levels. 

(c) The Permittee may ramp down the hazardous waste feed rate of pumpable hazardous 

waste over a period not to exceed one (1) minute during an AWFCO event in accordance 

with the procedures in the O&M plan, providing the automatic waste feed cutoff is not 

triggered by an exceedance of any of the following operating limits: 

(1) Minimum combustion chamber temperature, 

(2) Maximum hazardous waste feed rate, or 

(3) Any hazardous waste combustor firing system operating limits. 

The procedures for AWFCO events specified in the O& M plan must include a statement 

that the ramp down must begin immediately upon initiation of automatic waste feed cutoff 

and must prescribe a bona fide ramping down. 

(d) After an AWFCO event, the Permittee shall not restart the hazardous waste feed until the 

operating parameters and emission levels are within their respective limits. 

(e) If after any AWFCO event, there is an exceedance of an emission standard or operating 

requirement, irrespective of whether the exceedance occurred while hazardous waste 

remained in the combustion chamber, the Permittee shall: 

(1) Investigate the cause of the AWFCO, 

(2) Take appropriate corrective measures to minimize future AWFCOs, and 

(3) Record the findings and corrective measures in the operating record. 

D.12.9 Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) Program [326 IAC 2-2-3, 40 CFR 63, Subpart DD, 40 CFR 61, 

Subpart V] 

The LDAR standards that apply to components associated with the waste transfer/feed systems 

connected to the T49 liquid waste incinerator are described in Section E.2 of this permit. 

D.12.10 Inspection Requirements [40 CFR 63.1206(c)] 

(a) In order to satisfy the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1206(c)(5)], the Permittee shall 

conduct daily visual inspections of the T49 liquid waste incinerator to ensure the 

combustion zone is sealed. 

(b) In order to satisfy the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1206(c)(3)(vii)], the Permittee 

shall test the AWFCO system and associated alarms at least once per week to verify 

operability, unless the operating record documents that the weekly inspections unduly 

restrict or upset operations and that less frequent inspection will be adequate. At a 

minimum, the Permittee shall conduct operability testing monthly.

D.12.11 Training and Certification Requirements [40 CFR 63.1206(c)(6)] 

(a) In order to satisfy the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1206(c)(6)], the Permittee shall 

establish a Training and Certification Program for all categories of personnel whose 

activities may reasonably be expected to directly affect emissions of HAPs from all 

operations associated with the T49 liquid waste incinerator. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 105 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Said programs shall be of a technical level commensurate with the person’s duties as 

specified in the training manual. All operating training and certification programs shall be 

recorded in the operating record. 

(b) A certified control room operator shall be on duty at the site at all times the T49 liquid 

waste incinerator is in operation and the T49 liquid waste incinerator, including 

associated air pollution control equipment and continuous monitoring systems, shall be 

operated and maintained at all times by persons who are trained and certified according 

to the Training and Certification Program. 

D.12.12 Plans and Procedures [326 IAC 2-2-3, 40 CFR 63.1206, 40 CFR 63.1211, 326 IAC 2-7-5(13)] 

In order to satisfy the HWC MACT Standards [40 CFR 63.1206] and the PSD BACT requirements 

[326 IAC 2-2-3], the Permittee shall develop and implement the following written plans, which 

shall be maintained in the operating record: 

(a) Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan – The O&M Plan shall define operations during 

periods of normal operation pursuant to 40 CFR 63.1206(c)(1) and (7). 

(b) Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction (SSM) Plan shall be developed and implemented in 

accordance with 40 CFR 63.1206(c)(2), 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3), and 40 CFR 63.8(c), to 

ensure that the T49 liquid waste incinerator, including associated air emission control 

equipment and CEMS and CMS, is operated and maintained in a manner which satisfies 

the general duty to minimize emissions established by 40 CFR 63.6(e)(1)(i), and that all 

malfunctions are corrected as soon as practicable after their occurrence in order to 

minimize excess emissions. The SSM Plan shall contain the following information: 

(1) Detailed procedures for operating and maintaining the T49 liquid waste 

incinerator system, including associated CEMS and CMS equipment, during 

periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction; and 

(2) Corrective action program for malfunctioning process, air pollution control, 

CEMS, and CMS equipment. 

(c) Feedstream Analysis Plan -The Feedstream Analysis Plan shall be developed and 

implemented in accordance with 40 CFR 63.1209(c)(2) for those parameters with feed 

rate limits defined in Condition D.12.15. 

(d) Continuous Emissions Monitoring System (CEMS) Standard Operating Procedures 

(SOP) – The Permittee shall prepare and implement a SOP that provides step-by-step 

procedures and operations of the CEMS in accordance with 326 IAC 3-5-4(a)(9) – 

Preventive maintenance procedures and corrective maintenance procedures that include 

those procedures taken to ensure continuous operation and to minimize malfunctions. 

Testing and Monitoring Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-6(1) (6)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.12.13 Performance Test Requirements [40 CFR 63.1207, 326 IAC 2-1.1-11, 326 IAC 3-6] 

The following streamlined performance test requirements shall satisfy the NESHAP General 

Provisions [40 CFR 63.7], the HWC MACT requirements [40 CFR 63.1207 and 63.1209], the 

PSD BACT requirements for VOC and fluorides [326 IAC 2-1.1-11] and the State emission testing 

requirements [326 IAC 3-6]: 

(a) Initial Comprehensive Performance Test Requirements: 

(1) The Permittee shall submit a notification of intention to conduct a comprehensive 

performance test and CMS performance evaluation and a site-specific test plan 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 106 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

and CMS performance evaluation test plan at least one year before the 

performance test and performance evaluation are scheduled to begin. 

(2) The Permittee shall perform initial comprehensive performance tests within 6 

months after the HWC MACT compliance date unless an exemption is granted 

pursuant to 40 CFR 63.1207(e)(3). 

(3) The Permittee shall submit a notification of intention to conduct the 

comprehensive performance test at least 60 calendar days before the test is 

scheduled to begin. 

(4) The initial comprehensive performance tests shall be conducted under operating 

conditions representative of the extreme range of normal conditions as specified 

in 40 CFR 63.6(f)(2)(iii)(B) and 63.7(e)(1) for the worst case mode associated 

with each applicable pollutant limit or emission standard. 

(5) The operating parameters defined in Condition D.12.15 shall be monitored during 

the performance test to establish the parametric limits. 

(6) All required comprehensive performance testing shall be completed within 60 

days after the date of commencement of the tests pursuant to 40 CFR 

63.1207(d)(3). 

(7) The Permittee may use previous emissions test data in lieu of the initial 

comprehensive performance tests as allowed under 40 CFR 63.1207(c)(2). 

(8) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.7(h)(2), individual performance tests may be waived upon 

written application to the Administrator if, in the Administrator’s judgment, the 

source is meeting the relevant standard(s) on a continuous basis, or the source 

is being operated under an extension of compliance, or the owner or operator 

has requested an extension of compliance and the Administrator is still 

considering the request. 

(9) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.1207(j), the Permittee shall: 

(A) Postmark a Notification of Compliance (NOC) documenting compliance 

or noncompliance with the emission standards and continuous 

monitoring system requirements and identify operating parameter limits 

under 40 CFR 63.1209 within 90 days of completion of the 

comprehensive performance test; and 

(B) Comply with all operating requirements specified in the NOC in lieu of 

the limits specified in the Documentation of Compliance required under 

40 CFR 63.1211(c) upon postmark of the NOC. 

These submittal requirements satisfy the reporting requirements of 326 IAC 3-6 

as allowed under extension provisions of 326 IAC 3-6-4(b). 

(b) Subsequent Comprehensive Performance Tests 

(1) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.1207(d)(4)(i), no subsequent comprehensive 

performance tests (including DRE tests) shall be required until the U.S. EPA 

promulgates permanent replacement standards pursuant to the Settlement 

Agreement noticed in the Federal Register on November 16, 2001, unless the 

Permittee modifies or otherwise alters operations such that compliance with the 

emission standards of Conditions D.12.2, D.12.5, and D.12.7 cannot be 

achieved. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 107 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(2) Upon promulgation of the permanent replacement standards, the Permittee shall 

comply with the subsequent comprehensive testing requirements established. 

(c) Confirmatory Performance Tests 

(1) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.1207(d)(4)(ii), no confirmatory performance tests shall be 

required until the U.S. EPA promulgates permanent replacement standards 

pursuant to the Settlement Agreement noticed in the Federal Register on 

November 16, 2001.

(2) Upon promulgation of the permanent replacement standards, the Permittee shall 

comply with the subsequent comprehensive testing requirements established. 

D.12.14 Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) Operating Requirements [40 CFR 63.1209, 

40 CFR 63.8, 326 IAC 2-7-24, 326 IAC 3-5, 326 IAC 2-1.1-11, 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, and 40 

CFR 60, Appendix F] 

(a) CO and O2 CEMS Operation Requirements – The following provisions shall be applied at 

all times the T49 incinerator is in operation and represent the streamlined requirements of 

the HWC MACT standards for CO and HC [40 CFR 63.1209(a), (d), (e), (f), and (h)], PSD 

BACT requirements for CO and VOC [326 IAC 2-1.1-11], and the emission monitoring 

requirements for MACT and PSD sources [326 IAC 3-5-1(b) and (d)]: 

(1) The Permittee shall install and operate the CO and O2 CEMS in accordance with 

the QA requirements of the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63, Appendix to 

Subpart EEE], the applicable QC and performance evaluation requirements of 40 

CFR 63.1209(d), and the applicable performance specification requirements of 

40 CFR 60, Appendix B. 

(2) The CEMS shall be installed and operational upon certification of the DOC for the 

HWC MACT. 

(3) Continuous operation is defined as the collection of at least one measurement for 

each successive 15-minute period. 

(b) SO2 and NOx CEMS Operation Requirements – The following requirements shall apply 

when the T49 Incinerator is burning waste 

(1) The Permittee shall install and operate the SO2 and NOx CEMS in accordance 

with the QA/QC criteria set forth in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B and 40 CFR 60, 

Appendix F, Procedure 1. 

(2) Continuous operation is defined as the collection of at least one measurement for 

each successive 15-minute period. 

(3) The Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction (SSM) Plan required by Condition 

D.12.12 (b) shall include procedures for monitoring and recording the following 

information during times of SO2 or NOx CEMS malfunction: 

(A) When the SO2 CEMS malfunctions, the Permittee shall monitor and 

record the Hydro-SonicTM equivalent pressure drop and scrubber liquid 

flow rate as required by Condition D.12.15 (a)(3)(C) and (D) and the 

scrubber liquid pH as required by Condition D.12.15 (a)(5)(C). 

(B) When the NOx CEMS malfunctions, the Permittee shall monitor and 

record the combustion chamber temperature, combustion air flow rate, 

and primary and secondary waste feed rates as required by Condition 

D.12.15 (a)(1), and assess NOx emissions, using waste testing, waste 

shipment and process knowledge, to determine whether the quantity of 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 108 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

nitrogen fed into the incinerator during that time could have exceeded the 

worst case 24-hour daily average nitrogen feed rate of 1,650 pounds per 

hour that formed the basis of the NOx BACT limit. 

D.12.15 Parametric Continuous Monitoring Systems (CMS) Requirements [40 CFR 63.8(c), 40 CFR 

63.1209, and 326 IAC 2-1.1-11] 

(a) The Permittee shall operate the CMS to monitor the Operating Parameter Limits (OPLs) 

listed in D.12.5(g) in accordance with the quality assurance requirements specified in 40 

CFR 63.1209(d) at all times the T49 incinerator is in operation. To satisfy the HWC 

MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1209(b), (d), (e), (f), and (h)] and the requirements for PSD 

sources [326 IAC 2-1.1-11] the parameters listed in D.12.5(g) shall be monitored at all 

times the T49 incinerator is in operation. 

(b) Continuous operation is defined as the collection of at least one measurement for each 

successive 15-second period. 

(c) Pursuant to the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1209(a)(5)] and the compliance 

monitoring methods for PSD sources [326 IAC 2-1.1-11], the Permittee may petition the 

Administrator to use CEMS for compliance monitoring in lieu of compliance with the 

operating parameter limits established in (a) of this condition. 

(d) If applicable, the Permittee may document compliance using the waiver provisions of 40 

CFR 63.1207(m) in lieu of complying with the requirements of (a) and (c) of this condition. 

D.12.16 Minimum Data Requirements – SO2 and NOx Compliance [326 IAC 2-1.1-11] 

The following defines when CEMS data must be supplemented with data required by condition 

D.12.14 (b)(3), D.12.17 (a)(12), and D.12.18 (a)(2): 

(a) When the period of incinerator operation (i.e., receiving waste streams) is 4 hours or 

greater in an operating day and monitoring data are insufficient to constitute a valid hour 

of data for at least 75 % of the operating hours, or 

(b) When the period of incinerator operation (i.e., receiving waste streams) is less than 4 

hours in an operating day and more than one of the hours during the period of operation 

does not constitute a valid hour of data due to insufficient monitoring data. 

(c) Monitoring data are insufficient to constitute a valid hour of data if measured values are 

unavailable for any of the required 15-minute periods within the hour. 

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirement [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-19] 

D.12.17 Record keeping Requirements 

(a) The Permittee shall maintain the following records: 

(1) Notifications, reports, and other documents, such as the Documentation of 

Compliance, as required by 40 CFR 63.1200, 63.1211(c), and 63.10(b) and (c). 

(2) All data recorded by continuous monitoring systems (CMS), including continuous 

emission monitoring systems (CEMS), required by Conditions D.12.14 and 

D.12.15; 

(3) Documentation that a change will not adversely affect compliance with the 

emission standards or operating requirements as required by 40 CFR 

63.1206(b)(5)(ii); 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 109 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(4) Records of the estimated hazardous waste residence time as required by 40 

CFR 63.1206(b)(11); 

(5) Plans and procedures as required by Condition D.12.12; 

(6) Documentation of the results of the investigation, corrective measures taken, and 

evaluation of excessive exceedances during malfunctions as required by 40 CFR 

63.1206(c)(2)(v)(A); 

(7) Corrective Measures for any AWFCO that results in an exceedance of an 

applicable emission standard or operating parameter limit as required by 40 CFR 

63.1206(c)(3)(v); 

(8) Documentation of the results of the AWFCO operability testing as required by 

Condition D.12.10 (b) and 40 CFR 63.1206(c)(3)(vii); 

(9) Daily visual inspection records of the T49 liquid waste incinerator to ensure the 

combustion zone is sealed as required by Condition D.12.10 (a) and 40 CFR 

63.1206(c)(5); 

(10) A copy of the Operator Certification and Training Program required by Condition 

D.12.11 and 4 0 CFR 63.1206(c)(6); 

(11) Documentation of the changes in modes of operation as required by 40 CFR 

63.1209(q); and 

(12) For days when Condition D.12.16 requires that CEMS data must be 

supplemented, the documentation of the information required by Condition 

D.12.14 (b)(3). 

D.12.18 Reporting Requirements 

(a) Quarterly Reporting Requirements 

(1) The following streamlined quarterly reporting requirements shall satisfy the HWC 

MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1211], which references the MACT General 

Provisions [63.7-63.10], PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11], and the 

continuous emissions monitoring requirements [326 IAC 3-5]: 

(A) Reports shall be submitted within 30 days following the reporting period 

using the reporting forms located at the end of this permit, or their 

equivalent; 

(B) Summary reports of excess emissions, parameter exceedances, and 

monitor downtime including information specified in 63.10(c)(5)-(c)(13); 

(C) SSM summary reports for the T49 waste incinerator control system, 

including associated CEMS and CMS equipment; 

(D) Excessive exceedances report, if applicable, as required by 40 CFR 

63.1206(c)(3)(vi); and 

(2) In addition to the requirements described in (a)(1) of this condition, the Permittee 

shall report the following information for the NOx and SO2 CEMS to satisfy the 

PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11]: 

(A) A list of days when condition D.12.16 requires that CEMS data must be 

supplemented that provides: 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 110 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(B) A detailed report for each day when condition D.12.16 requires that 

CEMS data must be supplemented: 

(i) the information required by Condition D.12.14 (b)(3), and 

(ii) an analysis of whether that information indicates continuous 

compliance with the limit established in Condition D.12.3 or 

D.12.4, and if the NOx CEMS malfunctions for greater than six 

continuous hours, an assessment of NOx emissions using waste 

testing, waste shipment, and process knowledge whether the 

quantity of nitrogen fed into the incinerator during that time could 

have exceeded the worst case 24-hour daily average nitrogen 

feed rate of 1,650 pounds per hour that formed the basis of the 

NOx BACT limit. 

(b) Immediate Reporting Requirements 

(1) The Permittee shall submit any revision to the SSM Plan that may significantly 

increase emissions of hazardous air pollutants to the Administrator for approval 

within 5 days after making a change to the plan to satisfy the reporting 

requirements under the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1206(c)(2)(ii)(C)]. 

(2) The reporting requirements in the NESHAP General Provisions for Startup, 

Shutdown and Malfunction (SSM) Plans [40 CFR 63.6(e)(3)] shall be used to 

satisfy the reporting requirements under the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 

63.1206(c)(2)] and PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11]. 

(A) The Permittee shall report all actions taken during a T49 incinerator 

system SSM event that results in an exceedance of a relevant emission 

standard when those actions are inconsistent with the procedures 

specified in the SSM Plan. The immediate report shall be submitted to 

the agency via a telephone call or facsimile within 2 working days after 

commencing actions inconsistent with the plan. 

(B) Within 7 working days after the end of an SSM event where an action 

taken by the Permittee is not consistent with the procedures specified in 

the SSM Plan, the Permittee shall submit a letter containing the following 

information in accordance with 40 CFR 63.10(d)(5): 

(i) Name, title and signature of responsible official certifying 

accuracy; 

(ii) Explanation of the circumstances of the event; 

(iii) Reason for not following the SSM Plan; and 

(iv) Report any excess emissions and/or parameter monitoring 

exceedances are believed to have occurred. 

Modifications and Construction Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-10.5, 326 IAC 2-7-12 and 326 IAC 2-2] 

D.12.19 Modifications and Construction: Advance Approval of Permit Conditions 

(a) The Permittee may modify any existing emission units listed in this section of the permit 

without obtaining a source modification approval (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-

10.5), a Title V permit modification (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-2), 

provided the modified emission units are subject to the same applicable requirements 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 111 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

listed in this D section, and the Permittee shall comply with the Change Management and 

Flexible Permit provisions in Section F.1 of this permit. 

(b) The Permittee may construct and install new emission units of the types described in this 

D section without obtaining a source modification approval (otherwise required by 326 

IAC 2-7-10.5), a Title V permit modification (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-2), 

provided the new emission units are subject to the same applicable requirements listed in 

this D section, and the Permittee shall comply with the Change Management and Flexible 

Permit provisions in Section F.1 of this permit. 

The remainder of the page is left blank intentionally. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 112 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION D.13 T149 ROTARY KILN INCINERATOR, INCLUDING ASSOCIATED AIR POLLUTION 

CONTROL EQUIPMENT AND CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS 

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The information describing the processes contained in the following facility description box is descriptive 

information and does not constitute enforceable conditions: 

Emission Unit Description Building Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity Control Device 

T149 Rotary Kiln incinerator with 

Secondary Combustion Chamber 

(Natural Gas for Startup, Fuel Oil for 

Deslagging Operations) 

T149 T149 Stack 50 MMBtu/hr 

SNCR; 

Condenser/Absorber; 

Hydro-SonicTM Scrubber 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.13.1 General Applicability Requirements with Emission Standards [326 IAC 2-2-3 and 40 CFR 63, 

Subparts DD and EEE] 

(a) Pursuant to the Hazardous Waste Combustor (HWC) MACT Standards [40 CFR 

63.1206(b)(1)(i)] and the PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3], the emission 

standards and operating requirements shall apply as specified in Conditions D.13.2, 

D.13.3, D.13.4, D.13.5, D.13.6, and D.13.7 except during periods of startup, shutdown, 

and malfunction. 

(b) Pursuant to the Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations MACT Standards [40 CFR 

63.684(b)(5)(i)], the T149 rotary kiln incinerator shall have a permit issued under 40 CFR 

270 whenever off-site waste material is treated and destroyed in the T149 rotary kiln 

incinerator. The incinerator shall operate in accordance with the HWC MACT standards 

under 40 CFR 63, Subpart EEE. 

(c) Pursuant to the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1206(b)(5)(ii) and (iii)] and the PSD 

BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3], the Permittee may make a change in the design, 

operation, or maintenance practices documented in the comprehensive performance test 

plan (CPT plan), Documentation of Compliance (DOC), Notification of Compliance 

(NOC), or startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan (SSM plan), as long as the Permittee 

complies with the following requirements: 

(1) If it is determined that the change may adversely affect compliance with any 

emission standard, the Permittee shall comply with the requirements specified in 

40 CFR 63.1206(b)(5)(i) prior to implementing the change(s). 

(2) If it is determined that the change will not adversely affect compliance with the 

emission standards of this condition, the Permittee may implement the change(s) 

but must revise as necessary the performance test plan, Documentation of 

Compliance, Notification of Compliance, and startup, shutdown, and malfunction 

plan, to reflect the change(s). 

D.13.2 Particulate Matter Emission Standards [40 CFR 63.1203] 

In order to satisfy the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1203(b)(7)], the particulate matter (PM) 

emissions from the T149 rotary kiln incinerator stack exhaust shall not exceed 34 mg/dscm 

(0.015 gr/dscf), corrected to 7 percent oxygen. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 113 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

D.13.3 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Emission Standards [326 IAC 2-2-3 and 326 IAC 7-1.1-2] 

(a) In order to satisfy the PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3], the T149 rotary kiln 

incinerator shall be equipped with a caustic scrubber system to control SO2 emissions. 

The SO2 emissions from the incinerator stack exhaust shall not exceed 400 ppmv dry 

corrected to 7% oxygen, averaged over a 24-hour daily period when burning waste 

streams. 

(b) In order to satisfy the State SO2 rules [326 IAC 7-1.1-2], the SO2 emissions from the 

combustion of fuel oil during the deslagging process in the T149 rotary kiln incinerator 

shall not exceed 0.5 pounds per million British thermal units (lbs/MMBtu). 

D.13.4 Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) Emission Standards [326 IAC 2-2-3] 

In order to satisfy the PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3], the T149 rotary kiln incinerator 

shall be equipped with selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) equipment to control NOx

emissions. The NOx emissions from the incinerator stack exhaust shall not exceed 170 ppmv dry 

corrected to 7% oxygen, expressed as NO2, averaged over a 24-hour daily period when burning 

waste streams. 

D.13.5 Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP) Emission Standards [40 CFR 63.1203, US EPA approved 

Alternative Monitoring Petition initially approved January 27, 2006]

Except for periods of startup, shutdown and malfunctions, the following emission standards shall 

apply at all times the T149 rotary kiln incinerator is operating: 

(a) Mercury – Pursuant to the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1203(b)(2)], the mercury 

emissions from the T149 rotary kiln incinerator stack exhaust shall not exceed 45 

ug/dscm, corrected to 7% oxygen on a 12-hour rolling average basis, from block hourly 

averages. 

(b) Lead and Cadmium – Pursuant to the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1203(b)(3)], 

the total semi-volatile metals (lead and cadmium) emissions from the T149 rotary kiln 

incinerator stack exhaust shall not exceed 120 ug/dscm, corrected to 7 percent oxygen 

on a 12-hour rolling average basis, from block hourly averages. 

(c) Arsenic, Beryllium, and Chromium – Pursuant to the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 

63.1203(b)(4)], the total low volatile metals (arsenic, beryllium, and chromium) emissions 

from the T149 rotary kiln incinerator stack exhaust shall not exceed 97 ug/dscm, 

corrected to 7 percent oxygen on a 12-hour rolling average basis, from block hourly 

averages. 

(d) Hydrochloric Acid/Chlorine Gas (HCl/Cl2) and Fluorides - In order to satisfy the HWC 

MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1203(b)(6)], the HCl/Cl2 emissions from the T149 rotary kiln 

incinerator stack exhaust shall not exceed 21 ppmvdc, expressed as HCl equivalent on a 

12-hour rolling average basis, from block hourly averages. In order to satisfy the PSD 

BACT requirements for fluorides [326 IAC 2-2-3], the T149 rotary kiln incinerator control 

system shall achieve an HCl control efficiency of 98 percent or greater. 

(e) Dioxin/Furans – Pursuant to HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1203(b)(1)], the 

dioxin/furan emissions from the T149 rotary kiln incinerator stack exhaust shall not 

exceed 0.20 ng TEQ/dscm, corrected to 7 percent oxygen. 

(f) Principle Organic Hazardous Constituents (POHCs) – Pursuant to the HWC MACT 

standards [40 CFR 63.1203(c)(1) and (2)], the Permittee shall comply with the following 

requirements: 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 114 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(1) The destruction and removal efficiency (DRE) for each principle organic 

hazardous constituent (POHC), excluding dioxin-listed hazardous wastes F020, 

F021, F022, F023, F026, or F027 shall be at least 99.99 percent. 

(2) Dioxin-listed hazardous wastes F020, F021, F022, F023, F026, or F027 shall not 

be burned in the T149 rotary kiln incinerator. 

(g) Operating Parameter Limits – In order to comply with the NESHAP from Hazardous 

Waste Combustors (HWC) emission limits in this condition, the operating parameters of 

the T149 Rotary Kiln Incinerator, as established during the performance tests done on 

September 20 and 21, 2005, and associated emission control equipment shall not 

exceed limits described below as maximum limits or fail to achieve limits described as 

minimum limits. 

The limits below are applicable when monitoring is required by D.13.15(a). 

Operating Parameter Limit Averaging 

Period 

Operating 

Limit Units 

Maximum Primary Waste Feed to Primary Combustion 

Chamber 1-hr RA1

 1,501 lbs/hr 

Maximum Secondary Waste Feed to Primary 

Combustion Chamber 1-hr RA1

 4,655 lbs/hr 

Maximum Solid Feed Rate 1-hr RA1 5,529 lbs/hr 

Minimum Primary Combustion Chamber Temperature 1-hr RA1 1,598 oF 

Maximum Primary Waste Feed to Secondary 

Combustion Chamber 1-hr RA1

 1,801 lbs/hr 

Maximum Secondary Waste Feed to Secondary 

Combustion Chamber 1-hr RA1

 1,440 lbs/hr 

Minimum Secondary Combustion Chamber 

Temperature 1-hr RA1

 1,809 oF 

Maximum Stack Gas Flow Rate 1-hr RA1 18,812 dscfm 

Maximum Waste Feed Viscosity Monthly 

Analysis 460 Centi-poise 

Minimum Waste Atomizing Pressure 1-hr RA1 75 psig 

Maximum Mercury Feed Rate in all Feed Streams 12-hr RA 0.0038 lbs/hr 

Maximum SVM Feed Rate in all Feed Streams 12-hr RA 3.2 lbs/hr 

Maximum LVM Feed Rate in all Feed Streams 12-hr RA 490 lbs/hr 

Maximum LVM feed rate in all Pumpable Feed Streams 12-hr RA 5.0 lbs/hr 

Maximum ash feed rate in all feed streams 12-hr RA 4,168 lbs/hr 

Maximum Total Chlorine feed rate in all feed streams 12-hr RA 1,977 lbs/hr 

Minimum Condenser/Absorber pressure drop 1-hr RA 1 in w.c. 

Minimum Condenser/Absorber liquid feed pressure 1-hr RA 5 psig 

Minimum Condenser/Absorber scrubber water pH 1-hr RA 2.5 pH 

Minimum Condenser/Absorber scrubber liquid flow rate 1-hr RA 980 gpm 

Minimum Hydro-Sonic Scrubber Equivalent Pressure 

Drop 1-hr RA 53 in w.c. 

Maximum Hydro-Sonic Scrubber conductivity 12-hr RA 2.3 % solids 

Minimum Hydro-Sonic Scrubber Liquid Feed Rate 1-hr RA 286 gpm 

Minimum Hydro-Sonic Scrubber water pH 1-hr RA 2.5 pH 

1. CMS shall be operated as described in D.13.15. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 115 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

D.13.6 Carbon Monoxide (CO) Emission Standards [326 IAC 2-2-3, 326 IAC 9-1, and 40 CFR 63.1203] 

In order to satisfy the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1203(b)(5)(i)] and the PSD BACT 

requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3], the CO emissions from the T149 rotary kiln incinerator stack 

exhaust, as monitored by a continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS), shall not exceed 

100 ppmv dry corrected to 7% oxygen, averaged over an hourly rolling basis, at all times the 

incinerator is operating except during startup, shutdown and malfunctions. 

D.13.7 Hydrocarbon (HC) and Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Emission Standards [326 IAC 2-2-3 

and 40 CFR 63.1203] 

(a) In order to satisfy the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1203(b)(5)(i)] and the PSD 

BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3], the highest hourly rolling average hydrocarbon 

emissions achieved, as monitored with a CEMS during an acceptable DRE test, shall not 

exceed 10 ppmv dry corrected to 7% oxygen or 99.99 percent, reported as propane. 

(b) During the DRE test for hydrocarbons, the CO emissions shall not exceed an hourly 

rolling average of 100 ppmv dry corrected to 7% oxygen (monitored with continuous 

emissions monitoring system). 

D.13.8 Automatic Waste Feed Cutoff System Requirements [40 CFR 63.1206] 

In order to satisfy the HWC MACT standards, the Permittee shall operate the T149 rotary kiln 

incinerator with a functioning Automatic Waste Feed Cutoff (AWFCO) system that meets the 

requirements of 40 CFR 63.1206(c)(3). 

(a) Except as allowed under (c) of this condition, the AWFCO system shall be operated such 

that it immediately and automatically cuts off the hazardous waste feed when any of the 

following occur at any time: 

(1) An operating parameter is exceeded; 

(2) An emission standard monitored by the CO CEMS is exceeded; 

(3) A span value of any CMS, except a CEMS, is met or exceeded; 

(4) Upon malfunction of a CMS (excluding the NOx and SO2 CEMS) monitoring an 

operating parameter limit or emission level; or 

(5) When any component of the automatic waste feed cutoff system fails. 

(b) During all AWFCO events, the Permittee shall continue to: 

(1) Duct combustion gases to the air pollution control system while hazardous waste 

remains in the combustion chamber; and 

(2) Monitor the applicable combustor operating parameters and emission levels. 

(c) The Permittee may ramp down the hazardous waste feedrate of pumpable hazardous 

waste over a period not to exceed one (1) minute during an AWFCO event in accordance 

with the procedures in the O&M plan, providing the automatic waste feed cutoff is not 

triggered by an exceedance of any of the following operating limits: 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 116 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(1) Minimum combustion chamber temperature, 

(2) Maximum hazardous waste feed rate, or 

(3) Any hazardous waste combustor firing system operating limits. 

The procedures for AWFCO events specified in the O& M plan must include a statement 

that the ramp down must begin immediately upon initiation of automatic waste feed cutoff 

and must prescribe a bona fide ramping down. 

(d) After an AWFCO event, the Permittee shall not restart the hazardous waste feed until the 

operating parameters and emission levels are within their respective limits. 

(e) If after any AWFCO event, there is an exceedance of an emission standard or operating 

requirement, irrespective of whether the exceedance occurred while hazardous waste 

remained in the combustion chamber, the Permittee shall: 

(1) Investigate the cause of the AWFCO, 

(2) Take appropriate corrective measures to minimize future AWFCOs, and 

(3) Record the findings and corrective measures in the operating record. 

D.13.9 Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) Program [326 IAC 2-2-3, 40 CFR 63, Subpart DD, 40 CFR 61, 

Subpart V] 

The LDAR standards that apply to components associated with the waste transfer/feed systems 

connected to the T149 rotary kiln incinerator are described in Section E.2 of this permit. 

D.13.10 Inspection Requirements [and 40 CFR 63.1206(c)] 

(a) In order to satisfy the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1206(c)(5)], the Permittee shall 

conduct daily visual inspections of the T149 rotary kiln incinerator to ensure the 

combustion zone is sealed. 

(b) In order to satisfy the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1206(c)(3)(vii)], the Permittee 

shall test the AWFCO system and associated alarms at least once per week to verify 

operability, unless the operating record documents that the weekly inspections unduly 

restrict or upset operations and that less frequent inspection will be adequate. At a 

minimum, the Permittee shall conduct operability testing monthly.

D.13.11 Training and Certification Requirements [40 CFR 63.1206(c)(6)] 

(a) Pursuant to the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1206(c)(6)], the Permittee shall 

establish a Training and Certification Program for all categories of personnel whose 

activities may reasonably be expected to directly affect emissions of HAPs from all 

operations associated with the T149 rotary kiln incinerator. 

Said programs shall be of a technical level commensurate with the person’s duties as 

specified in the training manual. All operating training and certification programs shall be 

recorded in the operating record. 

(b) A certified control room operator shall be on duty at the site at all times the T149 rotary 

kiln incinerator is in operation and the T149 rotary kiln incinerator, including associated 

air pollution control equipment and continuous monitoring systems, shall be operated and 

maintained at all times by persons who are trained and certified according to the Training 

and Certification Program. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 117 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

D.13.12 Plans and Procedures [326 IAC 2-2-3, 40 CFR 63.1206, 40 CFR 63.1211, 326 IAC 2-7-5(13)] 

In order to satisfy the HWC MACT Standards [40 CFR 63.1206] and the PSD BACT requirements 

[326 IAC 2-2-3], the Permittee shall develop and implement the following written plans, which 

shall be maintained in the operating record: 

(a) Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan – The O&M Plan shall define operations during 

periods of normal operation pursuant to 40 CFR 63.1206(c)(1) and (7). 

(b) Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction (SSM) Plan – The SSM Plan shall be developed and 

implemented in accordance with 40 CFR 63.1206(c)(2), 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3), and 40 CFR 

63.8(c), to ensure that the T149 rotary kiln incinerator, including associated air emission 

control equipment and CEMS and CMS, is operated and maintained in a manner which 

satisfies the general duty to minimize emissions established by 40 CFR 63.6(e)(1)(i), and 

that all malfunctions are corrected as soon as practicable after their occurrence in order 

to minimize excess emissions. The SSM Plan shall contain the following information: 

(1) Detailed procedures for operating and maintaining the T149 rotary kiln incinerator 

system, including associated CEMS and CMS equipment, during periods of 

startup, shutdown, and malfunction; and 

(2) Corrective action program for malfunctioning process, air pollution control, 

CEMS, and CMS equipment. 

(c) Emergency Safety Vent (ESV) Operating Plan – The ESV Operating Plan shall be 

developed and implemented in accordance with 40 CFR 63.1206(c)(4). The emission 

standards and operating plans apply even if hazardous waste is in the combustion 

chamber. 

(d) Feedstream Analysis Plan – The Feedstream Analysis Plan shall be developed and 

implemented in accordance with 40 CFR 63.1209(c)(2) for those parameters with feed 

rate limits defined in Condition D.13.15. 

(e) Continuous Emissions Monitoring System (CEMS) Standard Operating Procedures 

(SOP) – The Permittee shall prepare and implement an SOP that provides step-by-step 

procedures and operations of the CEMS in accordance with 326 IAC 3-5-4(a) (9) – 

Preventive maintenance procedures and corrective maintenance procedures that include 

those procedures taken to ensure continuous operation and to minimize malfunctions. 

Testing and Monitoring Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-6(1) (6)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.13.13 Performance Test Requirements [40 CFR 63.1207, 326 IAC 2-1.1-11, 326 IAC 3-6] 

The following streamlined performance test requirements shall satisfy the NESHAP General 

Provisions [40 CFR 63.7], the HWC MACT requirements [40 CFR 63.1207 and 63.1209], the 

PSD BACT requirements for VOC and fluorides [326 IAC 2-1.1-11] and the State emission testing 

requirements [326 IAC 3-6]: 

(a) Initial Comprehensive Performance Test Requirements: 

(1) The Permittee shall submit a notification of intention to conduct a comprehensive 

performance test and CMS performance evaluation and a site-specific test plan 

and CMS performance evaluation test plan at least one year before the 

performance test and performance evaluation are scheduled to begin. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 118 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(2) The Permittee shall perform initial comprehensive performance tests within 6 

months following the initial introduction of hazardous waste in the rotary kiln 

incinerator unless an exemption is granted pursuant to 40 CFR 63.1207(e)(3). 

(3) The Permittee shall submit a notification of intention to conduct the 

comprehensive performance test at least 60 calendar days before the test is 

scheduled to begin. 

(4) The initial comprehensive tests shall be conducted under operating conditions 

representative of the extreme range of normal conditions as specified in 40 CFR 

63.6(f)(2)(iii)(B) and 63.7(e)(1) for the worst case mode associated with each 

applicable pollutant limit or emission standard.

(5) The operating parameters defined in Condition D.13.15 shall be monitored during 

the performance test to establish the parametric limits. 

(6) All required comprehensive performance testing shall be completed within 60 

days after the date of commencement of the tests pursuant to 40 CFR 

63.1207(d)(3). 

(7) The Permittee may use previous emissions test data in lieu of the initial 

comprehensive performance tests as allowed under 40 CFR 63.1207(c)(2). 

(8) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.7(h)(2), individual performance tests may be waived upon 

written application to the Administrator if, in the Administrator’s judgment, the 

source is meeting the relevant standard(s) on a continuous basis, or the source 

is being operated under an extension of compliance, or the owner or operator 

has requested an extension of compliance and the Administrator is still 

considering the request. 

(9) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.1207(j), the Permittee shall: 

(A) Postmark a Notification of Compliance (NOC) documenting compliance 

or noncompliance with the emission standards and continuous 

monitoring system requirements and identify operating parameter limits 

under 40 CFR 63.1209 within 90 days of completion of the 

comprehensive performance test; and 

(B) Comply with all operating requirements specified in the NOC in lieu of 

the limits specified in the Documentation of Compliance required under 

40 CFR 63.1211(c) upon postmark of the NOC. 

These submittal requirements satisfy the reporting requirements of 326 IAC 3-6 

as allowed under extension provisions of 326 IAC 3-6-4(b). 

(b) Subsequent Comprehensive Performance Tests 

(1) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.1207(d)(4)(i), no subsequent comprehensive 

performance tests (including DRE tests) shall be required until the U.S. EPA 

promulgates permanent replacement standards pursuant to the Settlement 

Agreement noticed in the Federal Register on November 16, 2001, unless the 

Permittee modifies or otherwise alters operations such that compliance with the 

emission standards of Conditions D.13.2, D.13.5, and D.13.7 cannot be 

achieved. 

(2) Upon promulgation of the permanent replacement standards, the Permittee shall 

comply with the subsequent comprehensive testing requirements established. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 119 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(c) Confirmatory Performance Tests 

(1) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.1207(d)(4)(ii), no confirmatory performance tests shall be 

required until the U.S. EPA promulgates permanent replacement standards 

pursuant to the Settlement Agreement noticed in the Federal Register on 

November 16, 2001.

(2) Upon promulgation of the permanent replacement standards, the Permittee shall 

comply with the subsequent comprehensive testing requirements established. 

D.13.14 Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) Operating Requirements [40 CFR 60, 

Appendix B and Appendix F, 40 CFR 63.8, 326 IAC 2-1.1-11, 326 IAC 3-5, Alternative Monitoring 

Petition initially approved January 27, 2006]] 

(a) CO and O2 CEMS Operation Requirements – The following requirements shall be applied 

at all times the T149 rotary kiln incinerator is in operation and represent the streamlined 

requirements of the HWC MACT standards for CO and HC [40 CFR 63.1209(a), (d), (e), 

(f), and (h)], PSD BACT requirements for CO and VOC [326 IAC 2-1.1-11], and the 

emission monitoring requirements for MACT and PSD sources [326 IAC 3-5-1(b) and 

(d)]: 

(1) The Permittee shall install and operate the CO and O2 CEMS in accordance with 

the QA requirements of the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63, Appendix to 

Subpart EEE], the applicable QC and performance evaluation requirements of 40 

CFR 63.1209(d), the applicable performance specification requirements of 40 

CFR 60, Appendix B, and the Alternative Monitoring Petition (“AMP”) initially 

approved on January 27, 2006 and all subsequent revisions to the AMP. 

(2) The CEMS shall be installed and operational upon certification of the DOC for the 

HWC MACT. 

(3) Continuous operation is defined as the collection of at least one measurement for 

each successive 15-second period, regardless of startup, shutdown and 

malfunction. 

(b) SO2 and NOx CEMS Operation Requirements – The following requirements shall apply 

when the T149 rotary kiln incinerator is burning waste: 

(1) The Permittee shall install and operate the SO2 and NOx CEMS in accordance 

with the QA/QC criteria set forth in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, 40 CFR 60, 

Appendix F, Procedure 1, and the AMP approved on January 27, 2006. 

(2) Continuous operation is defined as the collection of at least one measurement for 

each successive 15-minute period. 

(3) The Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction (SSM) Plan required by Condition 

D.13.12 (b) shall include procedures for monitoring and recording the following 

information during times of SO2 or NOx CEMS malfunction: 

(A) When the SO2 CEMS malfunctions, the Permittee shall monitor and 

record the Hydro-SonicTM equivalent pressure drop and scrubber liquid 

flow rate as required by Condition D.13.15 (a)(3)(C) and (D) and the 

scrubber liquid pH as required by Condition D.13.15 (a)(5)(C). 

(B) When the NOx CEMS malfunctions, the Permittee shall monitor and 

record the combustion chamber temperature, combustion air flow rate, 

and primary and secondary waste feed rates as required by Condition 

D.13.15 (a)(1), and assess NOx emissions, using waste testing, waste 

shipment and process knowledge, to determine whether the quantity of 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 120 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

nitrogen fed into the incinerator during that time could have exceeded the 

worst case 24-hour daily average nitrogen feed rate of 1,379 pounds per 

hour that formed the basis of the NOx BACT limit. 

(c) Particulate Matter [PM] CEMS Alternative Operating Scenario Requirements – 

This permit provides the Permittee with the following Alternative Operating Scenario for 

purposes of satisfying the monitoring requirements of 40 CFR 63.1209. The Permittee 

shall operate the PM CEMS at all times the T149 Incinerator is in operation, except as 

provided in paragraphs (3) or (4) below. 

(1) The Permittee shall install and operate the PM CEMS in accordance with the 

QA/QC criteria set forth the AMP approved on January 27, 2006, and all 

subsequent revisions to the AMP. 

(2) Continuous operation is defined as the collection of at least one measurement for 

each successive 15-minute period. In order to calculate a valid one-hour block 

average, valid results must be available for at least three of the four 15-minute 

cycles in each hour. 

(3) During periods when the PM CEMS is malfunctioning or inoperative, the 

Permittee may use data from the Multi-Metal CEMS, as provided in the AMP 

approved January 27, 2006. 

(4) In lieu of operating the PM CEMS, the Permittee may satisfy the monitoring 

requirements of 40 CFR 63.1209 through operation of the Continuous Monitoring 

System requirements described in Section D.13.15(a). 

(d) Multi-Metals [MMX] CEMS Alternative Operating Scenario Requirements – 

This permit provides the Permittee with the following Alternative Operating Scenario for 

purposes of satisfying the monitoring requirements of 40 CFR 63.1209. The Permittee 

shall operate the MMX CEMS at all times the T149 Incinerator is in operation, except as 

provided in paragraphs (3) or (4) below. 

(1) The Permittee shall install and operate the MMX CEMS in accordance with the 

QA/QC criteria set forth the AMP approved on January 27, 2006, and all 

subsequent revisions to the AMP. 

(2) Continuous operation is defined as the collection of at least one measurement for 

each successive 15-minute period. In order to calculate a valid one-hour block 

average, valid results must be available for at least three of the four 15-minute 

cycles in each hour. 

(3) During periods when the MMX CEMS is malfunctioning or inoperative, the 

Permittee may use data from the PM CEMS, as provided in the AMP approved 

on January 27, 2006 and all subsequent revisions to the AMP. 

(4) In lieu of operating the MMX CEMS, the Permittee may satisfy the monitoring 

requirements of 40 CFR 63.1209 through operation of the Continuous Monitoring 

System requirements described in Section D.13.15(a). 

(e) Hydrogen Chloride [HCl] CEMS Alternative Operating Scenario Requirements – 

This permit provides the Permittee with the following Alternative Operating Scenario for 

purposes of satisfying the monitoring requirements of 40 CFR 63.1209. The Permittee 

shall operate the HCl CEMS at all times the T149 Incinerator is in operation, except as 

provided in paragraphs (3) or (4) below. 

(1) The Permittee shall install and operate the HCl CEMS in accordance with the 

QA/QC criteria set forth the AMP approved on January 27, 2006, and all 

subsequent revisions to the AMP. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 121 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(2) Continuous operation is defined as the collection of at least one measurement for 

each successive 15-minute period. 

(3) In lieu of operating the HCl CEMS, the Permittee may satisfy the monitoring 

requirements of 40 CFR 63.1209 through operation of the following Continuous 

Monitoring System requirements described in Section D.13.15(a). 

D.13.15 Parametric Continuous Monitoring Systems (CMS) Requirements [40 CFR 63.8(c), 40 CFR 

63.1209, and 326 IAC 2-1.1-11] 

(a) The Permittee shall operate the following CMSs in accordance with the quality assurance 

requirements specified in 40 CFR 63.1209(d) at all times the T149 incinerator is in 

operation. To satisfy the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1209(b), (d), (e), (f), and (h)] 

and the requirements for PSD sources [326 IAC 2-1.1-11], the following parameters shall 

be monitored at all times the T149 incinerator is in operation. The permittee shall operate 

the CMS as provided in the table below. The CEMS mode is when the HCl CEMS, and 

either the PM and/or the Metal CEMS are in operation in accordance with Condition 

D.13.14. If the permittee is not operating in CEMS mode, then the CMS in the 

Parametric Mode must be monitored.

Operating Parameter 

Monitor 

when in 

CMS 

Parametric 

Mode 

Monitor 

when in 

CEMS 

Mode 

Averaging 

Period Units Parameter for 

Maximum Primary Waste 

Feed to Primary 

Combustion Chamber 

X X 1-hr RA lbs/hr D.13.5(e) 

D.13.5(f) 

Maximum Secondary 

Waste Feed to Primary 

Combustion Chamber 

X X 1-hr RA lbs/hr D.13.5(e) 

D.13.5(f) 

Maximum Solid Feed Rate X X 1-hr RA lbs/hr D.13.5(e) 

D.13.5(f) 

Minimum Primary 

Combustion Chamber 

Temperature 

X X 1-hr RA o

F D.13.5(e) 

D.13.5(f) 

Maximum Primary Waste 

Feed to Secondary 

Combustion Chamber 

X X 1-hr RA lbs/hr D.13.5(e) 

D.13.5(f) 

Maximum Secondary 

Waste Feed to Secondary 

Combustion Chamber 

X X 1-hr RA lbs/hr D.13.5(e) 

D.13.5(f) 

Minimum Secondary 

Combustion Chamber 

Temperature 

X X 1-hr RA o

F D.13.5(e) 

D.13.5(f) 

Maximum Stack Gas Flow 

Rate X X 1-hr RA dscfm 

D.13.5(a) 

D.13.5(b) 

D.13.5(c) 

D.13.5(d) 

D.13.5(e) 

D.13.5(f) 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 122 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Operating Parameter 

Monitor 

when in 

CMS 

Parametric 

Mode 

Monitor 

when in 

CEMS 

Mode 

Averaging 

Period Units Parameter for 

Maximum waste feed 

viscosity X X Monthly 

Analysis 

Centipoise D.13.5(f) 

Minimum Waste 

Atomizing Pressure X X 1-hr RA psig D.13.5(f) 

Maximum Particulate 

Matter (PM) limit X 6-hr RA mg/dscm D.13.2(a) 

Maximum HCl/Cl2

emissions X 12-hr RA ppmv D.13.5(d) 

Maximum Mercury 

Emissions X 12-hr RA ug/dscm D.13.5(a) 

Maximum SVM emissions X 12-hr RA ug/dscm D.13.5(b) 

Maximum LVM Emissions X 12-hr RA ug/dscm D.13.5(c) 

Maximum mercury feed 

rate in all feed streams X 12-hr RA lbs/hr D.13.5(a) 

Maximum SVM feed rate 

in all feed streams X 12-hr RA lbs/hr D.13.5(b) 

Maximum LVM feed rate 

in all feed streams X 12-hr RA lbs/hr D.13.5(c) 

Maximum LVM feed rate 

in all pumpable feed 

streams 

X 12-hr RA lbs/hr D.13.5(c) 

Maximum ash feed rate in 

all feed streams X 12-hr RA lbs/hr D.13.2(a) 

Maximum Total Chlorine 

feed rate in all feed 

streams 

X 12-hr RA lbs/hr D.13.5(d) 

Minimum 

Condenser/Absorber 

pressure drop 

X 1-hr RA in w.c. 

D.13.5(a) 

D.13.5(b) 

D.13.5(c) 

D.13.5(d) 

Minimum 

Condenser/Absorber 

liquid feed pressure 

X 1-hr RA psig 

D.13.5(a) 

D.13.5(b) 

D.13.5(c) 

D.13.5(d) 

Minimum 

Condenser/Absorber 

scrubber water pH 

X 1-hr RA pH D.13.5(d) 

Minimum 

Condenser/Absorber 

scrubber liquid flow rate 

X 1-hr RA gpm 

D.13.5(a) 

D.13.5(b) 

D.13.5(c) 

D.13.5(d) 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 123 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Operating Parameter 

Monitor 

when in 

CMS 

Parametric 

Mode 

Monitor 

when in 

CEMS 

Mode 

Averaging 

Period Units Parameter for 

Minimum Hydro-Sonic 

Scrubber Equivalent 

Pressure Drop 

X 1-hr RA in w.c. 

D.13.2(a) 

D.13.5(a) 

D.13.5(b) 

D.13.5(c) 

D.13.5(d) 

Maximum Hydro-Sonic 

Scrubber conductivity X 12-hr RA % solids 

D.13.2(a) 

D.13.5 (a) 

D.13.5(b) 

D.13.5(c) 

Minimum Hydro-Sonic 

Scrubber Liquid Feed 

Rate 

X 1-hr RA gpm 

D.13.2(a) 

D.13.5(a) 

D.13.5(b) 

D.13.5(c) 

D.13.5(d) 

Minimum Hydro-Sonic 

Scrubber water pH X 1-hr RA pH D.13.5(d) 

(b) Continuous operation is defined as the collection of at least one measurement for each 

successive 15-second period, regardless of startup, shutdown and malfunction. 

(c) Pursuant to the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1209(a)(5)] and the compliance 

monitoring methods for PSD sources [326 IAC 2-1.1-11], the Permittee may petition the 

Administrator to use CEMS for compliance monitoring in lieu of compliance with the 

operating parameter limits established in (a) of this condition. 

(d) If applicable, the Permittee may document compliance using the waiver provisions of 40 

CFR 63.1207(m) in lieu of complying with (a) and (c) of this condition. 

D.13.16 Fuel Oil Sampling and Analysis for SO2 [326 IAC 2-1.1-11] [326 IAC 3-7-4] 

Pursuant to 326 IAC 3-7-4, the Permittee shall maintain sampling and analysis certification 

records of the fuel oil sulfur content in accordance with approved ASTM methods. 

D.13.17 Minimum Data Requirements – SO2 and NOx Compliance [326 IAC 2-1.1-11] 

The following defines when CEMS data must be supplemented with data required by condition 

D.13.14 (b)(3), D.13.18 (a)(13), and D.13.19 (a)(2): 

(a) When the period of incinerator operation (i.e., receiving waste streams) is 4 hours or 

greater in an operating day and monitoring data are insufficient to constitute a valid hour 

of data for at least 75 percent of the operating hours, or 

(b) When the period of incinerator operation (i.e., receiving waste streams) is less than 4 

hours in an operating day and more than one of the hours during the period of operation 

does not constitute a valid hour of data due to insufficient monitoring data. 

(c) Monitoring data are insufficient to constitute a valid hour of data if measured values are 

unavailable for any of the required 15-minute periods within the hour. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 124 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirement [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-19] 

D.13.18 Record keeping Requirements 

(a) The Permittee shall maintain the following records:

(1) Notifications, reports, and other documents, such as the Documentation of 

Compliance, as required by 40 CFR 63.1200, 63.1211(c), and 63.10(b) and (c). 

(2) All data recorded by continuous monitoring systems (CMS), including continuous 

emission monitoring systems (CEMS), required by Conditions D.13.14, D.13.15, 

and D.13.17; 

(3) Documentation that a change will not adversely affect compliance with the 

emission standards or operating requirements as required by 40 CFR 

63.1206(b)(5)(ii); 

(4) Records of the estimated hazardous waste residence time as required by 40 

CFR 63.1206(b)(11); 

(5) Plans and procedures as required by Condition D.13.12; 

(6) Documentation of the results of the investigation, corrective measures taken, and 

evaluation of excessive exceedances during malfunctions as required by 40 CFR 

63.1206(c)(2)(v)(A); 

(7) Corrective Measures for any AWFCO that results in an exceedance of an 

applicable emission standard or operating parameter limit as required by 40 CFR 

63.1206(c)(3)(v); 

(8) Documentation and results of the AWFCO operability testing as required by 

Condition D.13.10 (b) and 40 CFR 63.1206(c)(3)(vii); 

(9) Corrective measures for any ESV opening as required by 40 CFR 

63.1206(c)(4)(iii); 

(10) Daily visual inspection records of the T149 rotary kiln incinerator to ensure the 

combustion zone is sealed as required by Condition D.13.10 (a) and 40 CFR 

63.1206(c)(5); 

(11) A copy of the Operator Certification and Training Program required by Condition 

D.13.11 and 40 CFR 63.1206(c)(6); and 

(12) Documentation of the changes in modes of operation as required by 40 CFR 

63.1209(q). 

(13) For days when condition D.13.17 requires that CEMS data must be 

supplemented, the documentation of the information required by Condition 

D.13.14 (b)(3). 

(14) The time periods in which the Permittee is operating in CEMS mode as the 

primary monitoring scenario or the CMS systems described in D.13.15 as the 

primary monitoring scenario. 

(b) The record keeping and reporting requirements for the LDAR standards are described in 

Section E.2 of this permit. 

(c) The Permittee shall maintain quarterly records of all fuel oil used in the T149 rotary kiln 

incinerator on a calendar month average basis, for the following: 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 125 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(1) Sulfur content; 

(2) Heat content; 

(3) Fuel consumption; and 

(4) Sulfur dioxide emission rate in pounds per MMBtu.

D.13.19 Reporting Requirements 

(a) Quarterly Reporting Requirements 

(1) The following streamlined quarterly reporting requirements shall satisfy the HWC 

MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1211], which references the MACT General 

Provisions [63.7-63.10], PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11], and the 

continuous emissions monitoring requirements [326 IAC 3-5]: 

(A) Reports shall be submitted within 30 days following the reporting period 

using the reporting forms located at the end of this permit, or their 

equivalent; 

(B) Summary reports of excess emissions, parameter exceedances, and 

monitor downtime including information specified in 63.10(c)(5-(c)(13); 

(C) SSM summary reports for the T149 rotary kiln incinerator control system, 

including associated CEMS and CMS equipment; 

(D) Excessive exceedances report, if applicable, as required by 40 CFR 

63.1206(c)(3)(vi); and 

 

(E) Emergency safety vent opening reports as require by 40 CFR 

63.1206(c)(4)(iv); and 

(2) In addition to the requirements described in (a)(1) of this condition, the Permittee 

shall report the following information for the NOx and SO2 CEMS to satisfy the 

PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11]: 

(A) A list of days when condition D.13.17 requires that CEMS data must be 

supplemented 

(B) A detailed report for each day when condition D.13.17 requires that 

CEMS data must be supplemented that provides: 

(i) the information required by Condition D.13.14 (b)(3), and 

(ii) an analysis of whether that information indicates continuous 

compliance with the limit established in Condition D.13.3 or 

D.13.4, and if the NOx CEMS malfunctions for greater than six 

continuous hours, an assessment of NOx emissions using waste 

testing, waste shipment, and process knowledge whether the 

quantity of nitrogen fed into the incinerator during that time could 

have exceeded the worst case 24-hour daily average nitrogen 

feed rate of 1,379 pounds per hour that formed the basis of the 

NOx BACT limit. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 126 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(b) Immediate Reporting Requirements 

(1) The Permittee shall submit any revision to the SSM Plan that may significantly 

increase emissions of hazardous air pollutants to the Administrator for approval 

within 5 days after making a change to the plan to satisfy the reporting 

requirements under the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1206(c)(2)(ii)(C)]. 

(2) The reporting requirements in the NESHAP General Provisions for Startup, 

Shutdown and Malfunction (SSM) Plans [40 CFR 63.6(e)(3)] shall be used to 

satisfy the reporting requirements under the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 

63.1206(c)(2)] and PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11]. 

(A) The Permittee shall report all actions taken during T149 incinerator 

system SSM event that results in an exceedance of a relevant emission 

standard when those actions are in consistent with the procedures 

specified in the SSM Plan. The immediate report shall be submitted to 

the agency via a telephone call or facsimile within 2 working days after 

commencing actions inconsistent with the plan. 

(B) Within 7 working days after the end of an SSM event where an action 

taken by the Permittee is not consistent with the procedures specified in 

the SSM Plan, the Permittee shall submit a letter containing the following 

information in accordance with 40 CFR 63.10(d)(5): 

(i) Name, title and signature of responsible official certifying 

accuracy; 

(ii) Explanation of the circumstances of the event; 

(iii) Reason for not following the SSM Plan; and 

(iv) Report any excess emissions and/or parameter monitoring 

exceedances are believed to have occurred. 

Modifications and Construction Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-10.5, 326 IAC 2-7-12 and 326 IAC 2-2] 

D.13.20 Modifications and Construction: Advance Approval of Permit Conditions 

(a) The Permittee may modify any existing emission units listed in this section of the permit 

without obtaining a source modification approval (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-

10.5), a Title V permit modification (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-2), 

provided the modified emission units are subject to the same applicable requirements 

listed in this D section, and the Permittee shall comply with the Change Management and 

Flexible Permit provisions in Section F.1 of this permit. 

(b) The Permittee may construct and install new emission units of the types described in this 

D section without obtaining a source modification approval (otherwise required by 326 

IAC 2-7-10.5), a Title V permit modification (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-2), 

provided the new emission units are subject to the same applicable requirements listed in 

this D section, and the Permittee shall comply with the Change Management and Flexible 

Permit provisions in Section F.1 of this permit. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 127 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION D.14 BPM CONTROL SYSTEMS – RTO OPERATIONS

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The information describing the processes contained in the following facility description is descriptive 

information and does not constitute enforceable conditions: 

(a) The following emissions units are subject to applicable requirements described in this D section: 

Emission Unit Description Building Stack/Vent Nominal 

Capacity 

Control Device 

Regenerative Thermal 

Oxidizer 1 (RTO1) 

RTO1 RTO1 Stack 36 MMBtu/hr Caustic Scrubber 

System 

Regenerative Thermal 

Oxidizer 2 (RTO2) 

RTO2 RTO2 Stack 36 MMBtu/hr Caustic Scrubber 

System 

The RTO control system consists of two Regenerative Thermal Oxidizers, identified as RTO1 and 

RTO2, each equipped with caustic scrubbing systems and each exhausting to individual stacks. 

The closed vent system (CVS) associated with the RTO control system begins at the outlet of the 

production building roof fans exhausting to the RTO fume transport system and at the outlet side 

of the tank conservation vents of those tank modules exhausting to the RTO fume transport 

system and ends at the entrance of the RTO control system. 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.14.0 Requirement to Control Emissions [40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb, 40 CFR 63 Subpart GGG, 40 CFR 63 

Subpart DD, 326 IAC 2-2-3, and 326 IAC 8-5-3] 

Except for equipment excluded from emission control requirements and except as otherwise 

provided by statute or rule, or in this permit, the fumes from all emission units which reference 

this section shall be continuously routed to the RTO control system while emission units vented to 

the control equipment are in operation. Except as otherwise provided by statute or rule, or in this 

permit, the RTO control system shall be operated at all times that the emission units vented to the 

control equipment are in operation. 

D.14.1 Control Device and Closed Vent System Standards [40 CFR 63.1253(b), (c), and (d), 63.1254(a) 

and (c), 63.1256(b), (e), and (h), 63.1258(b), 40 CFR 63.685(c) and (d), 63.689(b), 63.690(b), 

63.693(f), 40 CFR 60.112b(a) and 60.113b(c), 326 IAC 2-2-3, and 326 IAC 8-5-3(b)] 

(a) RTO Control Device Standards – The RTO control device standards shall apply at all 

times the unit is burning waste fume streams, except as provided in Condition D.14.2 (a): 

(1) Carbon Monoxide (CO) – In order to satisfy PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-

2-3], CO emissions at the outlet of the RTO system shall not exceed a 24-hour 

daily average of 73 parts per million by volume (ppmv). 

(2) Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) – In order to satisfy PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 

2-2-3], NOx emissions at the outlet of the RTO system shall not exceed a 24-

hour daily average of 91 ppmv. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 128 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(3) Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) – In order to satisfy PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-2-

3], SO2 emissions, as measured at the outlet of the RTO system, shall not 

exceed a 24-hour daily average of 100 ppmv. 

(4) Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)/Volatile Organic Hazardous Air Pollutant 

(VOHAP) – In order to satisfy the Pharmaceutical MACT requirements [40 CFR 

63.1253(b), (c), and (d), 63.1254(a) and (c), and 63.1256(b), (e) and (h), and 

63.1258(b)], the Offsite Waste and Recovery Operations MACT requirements [40 

CFR 63.685(c) and (d), 63.689(b), 63.690(b), and 63.693(f)], the PSD BACT 

requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3], the Synthetic Pharmaceutical RACT requirements 

[326 IAC 8-5-3(b)], and the New Source Performance Standards for Volatile 

Organic Liquid Storage Vessel requirements [40 CFR 60.112b(a) and 

60.113b(c)], the Permittee shall meet one of the following streamlined 

VOC/VOHAP emission standards: 

(A) Concentration Emission Standard: 

(i) The VOC/VOHAP emissions shall not exceed 20 ppmv over a 

24-hour daily average at the outlet of the RTO system, measured 

via a TOC CEMS; 

(ii) The RTO combustion chamber temperature shall not be less 

than 1500F over a 24-hour daily average; and 

(iii) The RTO combustion chamber residence time shall not be less 

than 0.75 seconds over a 24-hour daily average, which is 

equivalent to a maximum 24-hour daily average stack exhaust 

air flow rate of 3340 standard cubic feet per second; or 

(B) Control Efficiency Emission Standard: 

(i) The VOC/VOHAP emissions shall be reduced by a control 

efficiency of 98% or more at the outlet of the RTO system; 

(ii) The RTO combustion chamber temperature shall not be less 

than 1500F over a 24-hour daily average; and 

(iii) The solvent concentration going to the RTO, measured as a 

percent of the lower explosive limit (LEL), shall not exceed a 24-

hour daily average established from a compliant stack test. 

The Permittee shall conduct a performance test for TOC before the 

control efficiency monitoring approach is used to assess compliance with 

this control efficiency standard 

(5) Hydrogen Halide/Halogen and Fluorides – In order to satisfy the Pharmaceutical 

MACT requirements [40 CFR 63.1253(b), (c), and (d), 63.1254(a) and (c), 

63.1256(b), (e) and (h), and 63.1258(b)] and PSD BACT requirements for 

fluorides [326 IAC 2-2-3], the Permittee shall meet one of the following hydrogen 

halide and halogen emission standards: 

(A) Concentration Emission Standard: 

(i) The hydrogen halide and halogen emissions, which includes 

hydrogen fluoride emissions, shall not exceed 20 ppmv over a 

24-hour daily average at the outlet of the RTO system, measured 

via a HCl CEMS; or 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 129 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(B) Control Efficiency Emission Standard: 

(i) The hydrogen halide and halogen emissions, which include 

hydrogen fluoride emissions, shall be reduced by a control 

efficiency of 98% or more at the outlet of the RTO system; 

(ii) The 24-hour daily average scrubber liquid pH of the caustic 

scrubbing system shall not be less than the value established 

from a compliant stack test; 

(iii) The 24-hour daily average scrubber liquid recirculation flow rate 

of the caustic scrubbing system shall not be less than the value 

established from a compliant stack test; and 

(iv) The 24-hour daily average scrubber caustic flow rate of the 

caustic scrubbing system shall not exceed the value established 

from a compliant stack test. 

The Permittee shall conduct a performance test for HCl before the 

control efficiency monitoring approach is used to assess compliance with 

this control efficiency standard. 

(b) RTO Closed Vent System Inspection Standards – The following inspection standards 

shall apply to the RTO closed vent system (CVS), except as provided in Condition D.14.2 

(b): 

(1) The Permittee shall comply with the following closed vent system inspection 

requirements to satisfy the Pharmaceutical MACT requirements [40 CFR 

63.1256(b)(3) and (e)(1) and 63.1258(h)], the Offsite Waste MACT requirements 

[40 CFR 63.685(g), 63.689(b), 63.690(b), 63.693(b) and (c), and 63.695(c)], and 

the PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3]: 

(A) Initial one-time Method 21 inspections shall be conducted on new 

portions of the RTO closed vent system not operated under negative 

pressure within 150 days after startup, if not subject to the LDAR 

requirements established in Section E of this permit. 

(B) Portions of the CVS that are operated under negative pressure shall be 

equipped with a pressure gauge or other pressure measurement/ 

detection. The data output must be viewable from a readily accessible 

location to verify that negative pressure is being maintained when waste 

fume streams are going to the control system. 

(C) Annual visual inspections of the RTO closed vent system shall be 

performed for visible cracks, holes or gaps, loose connections, and 

broken or missing caps. 

(D) Repair of any leak detected on the RTO closed vent system shall be 

initiated no later than 5 calendar days after identification, and completed 

within 15 days after identification, unless: 

(i) The repair is technically infeasible without a shutdown of an 

operation or process; or 

(ii) It is determined that emissions resulting from immediate repair 

would be greater than the fugitive emissions likely to result from 

delay of repair. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 130 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Repairs delayed due to either of the causes described in (A) or (B) shall 

be completed by the end of the next shutdown. 

(2) The Permittee shall monitor each bypass line on the RTO closed vent system to 

satisfy the Pharmaceutical MACT requirements [40 CFR 63.1252(b), 63.1253(b) 

and (c), and 63.1258(b)], the Offsite Waste MACT requirements [40 CFR 

63.685(g), 63.689(b), 63.690(b), and 63.693(c)], and the PSD BACT 

requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3] using one of the following methods: 

(A) Install and monitor the position of the closed vent system bypass valve at 

least once every 15 minutes, where the closed position means there is 

no bypass flow; or 

(B) Secure the bypass line valve in the closed position with a car seal or lock 

and key type configuration. Monthly visual inspections of seal or locking 

device shall be performed to ensure the seal is not broken or the valve is 

in the closed position and the vent stream is not diverted through the 

bypass line. 

D.14.2 Exceptions to RTO Control System Standards [40 CFR 63.1260(g), 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3) and 

63.8(c), and 40 CFR 63.681, 63.685(g), 63.693(b) and 326 IAC 2-2-3] 

(a) Exceptions to RTO Control Device Operational Standards – The following streamlined 

standards satisfy the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1260(g)], Offsite 

Waste MACT standards [40 CFR 63.681, 63.685(g) and 63.693(b)], and PSD BACT 

requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3]: 

(1) The Permittee may open a safety device and bypass the RTO system at any time 

conditions require it to do so to avoid unsafe conditions. 

(2) The provisions of Conditions D.14.1 (a) shall not apply during periods of startup, 

shutdown or malfunction that preclude the Permittee from complying with 

Condition D.14.1 (a), provided the Permittee complies with the provisions of the 

startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan (SSM Plan) required by Condition 

D.14.3. 

(b) Exceptions to RTO Closed Vent System Inspection Standards – The following 

streamlined standards satisfy the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 

63.1258(h)(6) and (7)], and PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3]: 

(1) The Permittee is not required to inspect if unsafe or difficult to inspect. 

D.14.3 Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction Requirements for RTO Control System [40 CFR 

63.1259(a)(3), 40 CFR 63.697(b)(3), 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3), 40 CFR 63.8(c) and 326 IAC 2-2-3] 

(a) The NESHAP General Provisions for Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction (SSM) Plans 

[40 CFR 63.6(e)(3)] shall be used to satisfy the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 

CFR 63.1259(a)(3)], Offsite Waste MACT standards [40 CFR 63.697(b)(3)], and PSD 

BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-2.1.11]. 

(b) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3), the Permittee shall develop an SSM Plan to ensure that 

the RTO control system, including associated CEMS and CMS equipment, is operated 

and maintained in a manner which satisfies the general duty to minimize emissions 

established by 40 CFR 63.6(e)(1)(i), and that all malfunctions are corrected as soon as 

practicable after their occurrence in order to minimize excess emissions. The SSM Plan 

shall contain the following information: 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 131 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(1) Detailed plans and/or procedures for operating and maintaining the RTO system, 

including associated CEMS and CMS equipment, during periods of startup, 

shutdown, and malfunction; and 

(2) Corrective action program for malfunctioning air pollution control, CEMS, and 

CMS equipment. 

Compliance Determination Requirements 

D.14.4 Requirement to Control Emissions [40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb, 40 CFR 63 Subpart GGG, 40 CFR 63 

Subpart DD, 326 IAC 2-2-3, and 326 IAC 8-5-3] 

Except for equipment excluded from emission control requirements and except as otherwise 

provided by statute or rule, or in this permit, the RTO control system shall be operated at all times 

that the emission units vented to the control equipment are in operation. 

Testing and Monitoring Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-6(1) (6)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.14.5 Continuous Emissions Monitoring System (CEMS) Requirements [40 CFR 60, Appendix B and 

Appendix F, 40 CFR 60.113b(c), 40 CFR 63.1258(b), 40 CFR 63.693(f), 40 CFR 63.8, 326 IAC 2-

1.1-11, 326 IAC 2-7-24, 326 IAC 3-5] 

(a) CO, NOx, and SO2 CEMS Operation Requirements –The following requirements shall 

apply when the RTO is burning waste fume streams: 

(1) The Permittee shall install and operate the CO, NOx, and SO2 CEMS in 

accordance with the quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) criteria set forth in 

40 CFR 60, Appendix B, and 40 CFR 60, Appendix F, Procedure 1. 

(2) Continuous operation is defined as the collection of at least one measurement for 

each successive 15-minute period. 

(3) The Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction (SSM) Plan required by Condition D.14. 

3 (b) shall include procedures for monitoring and recording the following 

information during times of CO or SO2 or NOx CEMS malfunction: 

(A) When the SO2 CEMS malfunctions, the Permittee shall monitor and 

record the scrubber liquid recirculation flow rate and caustic flow rate as 

required by Condition D.14. 6(b)(1) (A) and (B) respectively and the 

scrubber liquid pH as required by Condition D.14.6 (b)(1)(C). 

(B) When CO CEMS malfunctions, the Permittee shall monitor and record 

the RTO combustion chamber temperature, and exhaust airflow rate 

from the RTO as required by D.14.6 (a)(1) and (3), respectively. 

(C) When the NOx CEMS malfunctions, the Permittee shall monitor and 

record the combustion chamber temperature and exhaust airflow rate 

from the RTO as required by D.14.6 (a) (1) and (3), and assess NOx 

emissions, using process knowledge, to determine whether the quantity 

of nitrogen fed into the RTOs during that time could have exceeded the 

worst case 24-hour daily average nitrogen feed rate of 1, 085 pounds per 

hour that formed the basis of the NOx BACT limit. 

(b) TOC CEMS Operation Requirements –The following requirements shall apply only when 

burning waste fume streams and represent the streamlined requirements of the 

Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1258(b)], Offsite Waste MACT standards 

[40 CFR 63.693(f)], NESHAP General Provisions monitoring requirements [40 CFR 

63.8(c)], NSPS Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessel requirements [40 CFR 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 132 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

60.113b(c)], PSD BACT requirements for VOCs [326 IAC 2-1.1-11], and emission 

monitoring requirements for MACT and PSD sources [326 IAC 3-5-1(b) and (d)]: 

(1) The Permittee shall install and operate the CEMS in accordance with the QA/QC 

criteria set forth in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, 40 CFR 63.1258(b)(1)(x), and 40 

CFR 63.8. 

(2) Continuous operation is defined as the collection of at least one measurement for 

each successive 15-minute period. 

(c) HCl CEMS Operation Requirements – The following requirements shall apply only when 

burning waste fume streams and represent streamlined requirements for the 

Pharmaceutical MACT standards for hydrogen halides and halogens [40 CFR 

63.1258(b)], NESHAP General Provisions monitoring requirements [40 CFR 63.8(c)], and 

PSD BACT requirements for fluorides [326 IAC 2-1.1-11]: 

(1) The Permittee shall install and operate the HCl CEMS in accordance with the 

performance and QA/QC criteria established in the Updated Alternative 

Monitoring Plan for Hydrogen Chloride Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems 

for the Regenerative Thermal Oxidizers submitted to EPA OAQPS on August 15, 

2003, as allowed by 40 CFR 63.1258(b) and 40 CFR 63.8. 

(2) Continuous operation is defined as the collection of at least one measurement for 

each successive 15-minute period. 

(d) CEMS Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) - The Permittee shall prepare and 

implement an SOP that provides step-by-step procedures and operations in accordance 

with 326 IAC 3-5-4(a) (9) – Preventive maintenance procedures and corrective 

maintenance procedures that include those procedures taken to ensure continuous 

operation and to minimize malfunctions. 

D.14.6 Performance Testing Requirements [40 CFR 60.113b(c), 40 CFR 63.7, 40 CFR 63.1257(b), (c), 

and (d) and 63.1258(b)(3), 40 CFR 63.693(f), 326 IAC 3-6-3(c), 326 IAC 2-7-24, and 326 IAC 2-

1.1-11] 

(a) Initial Comprehensive Performance Test Requirements: 

(1) VOC/VOHAP – When applying the control efficiency standard, the following 

streamlined requirements shall apply only when burning waste fume streams to 

satisfy the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1257(b), (c), and (d) and 

63.1258(b)], Offsite Waste MACT standards [40 CFR 63.693(f)], Volatile Organic 

Liquid Storage Vessel requirements [40 CFR 60.113b(c)], PSD BACT 

requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11], and emission testing requirements for MACT 

sources [326 IAC 3-6-3(c)]: 

(A) Prior to applying the control efficiency emission standard, the Permittee 

shall conduct an initial performance test in accordance with the methods 

set forth in 40 CFR 63.1257. 

(B) The Permittee shall submit a notification of the performance test and a 

site-specific test plan at least 60 days in advance of the intended 

performance test date. 

(C) The operating parameters defined in Condition D.14.1 (a)(4)(B) shall be 

monitored during the performance test to establish the 24-hour daily 

average parametric limits, according to the requirements of 40 CFR 

63.1258(b)(3). 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 133 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(D) The Permittee shall submit the performance test reports, and upon 

request, the CMS performance evaluation, within 45 days following the 

test. The Permittee is allowed an extension if a reasonable explanation 

is provided within 40 days following the test. 

(2) Hydrogen Halide/Halogen – When applying the control efficiency standard, the 

following requirements shall apply only when burning waste fume streams to 

satisfy the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1258(b)] and the PSD 

BACT requirements for fluorides [326 IAC 2-1.1-11]: 

(A) Prior to applying the control efficiency emission standard, the Permittee 

shall conduct an initial performance test in accordance with the methods 

set forth in 40 CFR 63.1257. 

(B) The Permittee shall submit a notification of the performance test and a 

site-specific test plan at least 60 days in advance of the intended 

performance test date. 

(C) The operating parameters defined in Condition D.14.1 (a)(5)(B) shall be 

monitored during the performance test to establish the 24-hour daily 

average parametric limits, according to the requirements of 40 CFR 

63.1258(b)(3). 

(D) The Permittee shall submit the performance test reports, and upon 

request, the CMS performance evaluation, within 45 days following the 

test. The Permittee is allowed an extension of 15 days if a reasonable 

explanation is provided within 40 days following the test. 

(b) Subsequent Comprehensive Performance Test Requirements: 

If the Permittee is complying with the control efficiency emission standards for 

VOC/VOHAP and Hydrogen Halide/Halogens, the performance tests shall be repeated at 

least once every fifth year from the date of the most recent valid compliance 

demonstration. 

D.14.7 Parametric Continuous Monitoring System (CMS) Requirements [40 CFR 63.8(c), 40 CFR 

60.113b(c), 40 CFR 63.1257(b), 63.1258(a) and (b), and 63.1260(e), 40 CFR 63.693(b), 326 IAC 

2-1.1-11, 326 IAC 2-7-24, and 326 IAC 3-5-5(d)] 

(a) VOC/VOHAP CMS Operation Requirements - The following streamlined requirements 

shall apply only when burning waste fume streams to satisfy the Pharmaceutical MACT 

standards [40 CFR 63.1258(a) and (b)], Offsite Waste MACT standards [40 CFR 

63.693(b)], Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessel requirements [40 CFR 60.113b(c)], 

PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11], and continuous monitoring requirements for 

flow rate [326 IAC 3-5-5(d)]: 

(1) RTO Combustion Chamber Temperature – The Permittee shall install and 

operate the RTO combustion chamber temperature CMS in accordance with 40 

CFR 63.8(c). 

(2) Lower Explosive Level (LEL) Concentration – When applying the VOC/VOHAP 

control efficiency standard, the Permittee shall install and operate the LEL CMS 

in accordance with 40 CFR 63.8(c). 

(3) Flow Rate Monitor – When applying the VOC/VOHAP concentration emission 

standard, the Permittee shall install and operate airflow rate CMS at the stack 

exhaust in accordance with 326 IAC 3-5-5(d). 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 134 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(4) Continuous operation is defined as the collection of at least one measurement for 

each successive 15-minute period. 

(b) Hydrogen Halide/Halogen and Fluorides CMS Requirements – When applying the control 

efficiency standard requirements shall apply only when burning waste fume streams: 

(1) The Permittee shall install and operate the following CMSs in accordance with 40 

CFR 63.8(c): 

(A) Scrubber liquid pH monitor; 

(B) Scrubber liquid recirculation flow rate monitor; and 

(C) Scrubber caustic flow rate monitor. 

(2) Continuous operation is defined as the collection of at least one measurement for 

each successive 15-minute period. 

(c) CMS Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) – The Permittee shall prepare and implement 

a SOP for the CMS units in accordance with 40 CFR 63.8(d). 

D.14.8 Excursions [40 CFR 63.1258(b)(6), 40 CFR 63.695(e)(4)] 

(a) Pursuant to the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1258(b)(7)] and the Offsite 

Waste MACT [40 CFR 63.695(e)(4)], excursions are defined as follows and apply to the 

CEMS and CMS required by Conditions D.14.4 (b) and (c), and D.14.6, respectively: 

 

(1) When the period of control device operation (i.e., receiving waste fume streams) 

is 4 hours or greater in an operating day and monitoring data are insufficient to 

constitute a valid hour of data for at least 75 percent of the operating hours. 

(2) When the period of control device operation (i.e., receiving waste fume streams) 

is less than 4 hours in an operating day and more than one of the hours during 

the period of operation does not constitute a valid hour of data due to insufficient 

monitoring data. 

(b) A valid hour requires at least one data point for each 15-minute period in the operating 

hour. 

D.14.9 Minimum Data Requirements – SO2, CO, and NOx Compliance [326 IAC 2-1.1-11] 

The following defines when CEMS data must be supplemented with data required by conditions 

D.14. 4 (a)(3), D.14.9 (a)(1)(L), and D.14.9 (b)(2): 

(a) When the period of RTO operation (i.e., receiving waste streams) is 4 hours or greater in 

an operating day and monitoring data are insufficient to constitute a valid hour of data for 

at least 75 percent of the operating hours, or 

(b) When the period of RTO operation (i.e., receiving waste streams) is less than 4 hours in 

an operating day and more than one of the hours during the period of operation does not 

constitute a valid hour of data due to insufficient monitoring data. 

(c) Monitoring data are insufficient to constitute a valid hour of data if measured values are 

unavailable for any of the required 15-minute periods within the hour. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 135 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirement [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-19] 

D.14.10 Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements 

(a) Record Keeping Requirements 

The Permittee shall maintain the following records: 

(1) Control Device (RTO) Records – The following streamlined record keeping 

requirements satisfy the Pharmaceutical MACT requirements [40 CFR 63.1259], 

the Offsite Waste MACT standards [40 CFR 63.696], Volatile Organic Liquid 

Storage Vessel requirements [40 CFR 60.115b], PSD BACT requirements [326 

IAC 2-1.1-11 and 326 IAC 2-7-5(3)], and the continuous emission monitoring and 

performance testing requirements [326 IAC 3-5 and 3-6]: 

(A) Log of the operating scenario (i.e., concentration standard or control 

efficiency standard) applied to satisfy the VOC/VOHAP and hydrogen 

halide and halogen emission standards required by Conditions D.14.1 

(a)(4) and D.14.1 (a)(5) in an On-Site Implementation Log (OSIL); 

(B) Records of the current and superseded versions of SSM Plan; 

(C) Description of worst-case operating conditions, if complying with control 

efficiency standard; 

(D) Results of control device performance tests and CMS performance 

evaluations, if complying with control efficiency standard; 

(E) Records of all required CMS and CEMS data; 

(F) Records of each CMS and CEMS calibration checks; 

(G) Maintenance records for each control device, CMS, and CEMS; 

(H) Occurrence/duration records of each control device malfunction, CMS 

malfunction, and CEMS malfunction; 

(I) Information to demonstrate conformance with each SSM is consistent 

with procedures in the SSM Plan; 

(J) Records of actions taken during each SSM when different from SSM 

Plan; and 

(K) Record of the current standard operating procedure (SOP) for the RTO 

CEMS and CMS units. 

(L) For days when condition D.14.8 requires that CEMS data must be 

supplemented, the documentation of the information required by 

Condition D.14.4 (a)(3). 

(2) Closed Vent System (RTO CVS) Records – The following streamlined record 

keeping requirements satisfy the Pharmaceutical MACT requirements [40 CFR 

63.1259], the Offsite Waste MACT standards [40 CFR 63.696], Volatile Organic 

Liquid Storage Vessel requirements [40 CFR 60.115b], PSD BACT requirements 

[326 IAC 2-1.1-11 and 326 IAC 2-7-5(3)], and the continuous emission 

monitoring and performance testing requirements [326 IAC 3-5 and 3-6]: 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 136 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(A) Hourly records of bypass flow indicator operating status and the time and 

duration of all diversions detected by the bypass flow indicator, if 

complying via this method; 

(B) Monthly visual inspection records of bypass line valves and the 

occurrence of all periods the valve position has changed, if complying via 

this method; 

(C) Record each CVS component that is unsafe to inspect, and a plan for 

inspecting the component as frequently as practicable during safe-toinspect times; 

(D) Record each CVS component that is difficult to inspect and a written plan 

for inspecting the component at least once every five years; 

(E) Record the following information if no leaks are detected during 

applicable Method 21 inspections and CVS annual visual inspections: 

(i) Date each inspection was performed; and 

(ii) Statement for each inspection that no leaks were detected. 

(F) For each part of the CVS not operated under negative pressure, record 

the following information for all leaks detected during the initial Method 

21 inspection: 

(i) Identification of leaking equipment; 

(ii) Instrument ID and operator name or initials; 

(iii) Date the leak was detected and date of first attempt to repair 

leak; 

(iv) Maximum instrument reading after leak from initial Method 21 is 

successfully repaired or declared non-repairable; and 

(v) Record of reason for any delay of repair, name of person 

responsible for decision, expected date of repair, dates of 

shutdowns when repair is made and date of successful repair of 

leak. 

(G) Record the following information for all leaks detected from the CVS 

annual visual inspection: 

(i) Identification of leaking equipment; 

(ii) Date leak was detected and first attempt to repair leak; and 

(iii) Record of reason for any delay of repair, name of person 

responsible for decision, expected date of repair, dates of 

shutdowns when repair is made and date of successful repair of 

leak. 

(b) Quarterly Periodic Reports 

(1) The following streamlined reporting requirements satisfy the Pharmaceutical 

MACT requirements [40 CFR 63.1260(g)] and the Offsite Waste MACT 

standards [40 CFR 63.697], which reference the MACT General Provisions [40 

CFR 63.7 – 63.10], Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessel requirements [40 CFR 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 137 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

60.115b], PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11], and the continuous 

emission monitoring requirements [326 IAC 3-5]: 

(A) Reports shall be submitted within 30 days following the reporting period 

using the reporting forms located at the end of this permit, or their 

equivalent; 

(B) If total duration of excess emissions, parameter exceedances, or 

excursions is 1% or greater of total operating time OR total CMS 

downtime is greater than 5% for reporting period, include: 

(i) 15-minute data and daily averages for all operating days out of 

range; 

(ii) duration of excursions; and 

(iii) operating logs and scenarios for all operating days out of range;

(C) Summary reports of excess emissions, parameter exceedances, 

percentage of excursions and monitor downtime including information 

specified in 63.10(c)(5)-(c)(13); 

(D) Report, when applicable, no excess emissions, no exceedances, no 

excursions, and no CMS have been inoperative, out of control, repaired 

or adjusted; 

(E) For CVS bypass lines with flow indicator, report all periods when vent 

stream is diverted from control device through bypass line when on 

waste; 

(F) For CVS bypass lines without flow indicator, report periods which seal 

mechanism is broken, position has changed or key to unlock bypass line 

valve was checked out; 

(G) Report each new operating scenario that has been operated since last 

report; and 

(H) SSM summary reports for the RTO control system, including associated 

CEMS and CMS equipment. 

(2) In addition to the requirements described in D.14. (b)(1) of this condition, the 

Permittee shall report the following information for the SO2, CO, and NOx CEMS 

to satisfy the PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11]: 

(A) A list of days when condition D.14.8 requires that CEMS data must be 

supplemented: 

(B) A detailed report for each day when condition D.14.8 requires that CEMS 

data must be supplemented that provides: 

(i) the information required by Condition D.14.4 (a)(3), and 

(ii) an analysis of whether that information indicates continuous 

compliance with the limits established in Condition D.14.1 and if 

the NOx CEMS malfunctions for greater than six continuous 

hours, an assessment of NOx emissions, using process 

knowledge, whether the quantity of nitrogen fed into the RTO 

during that time could have exceeded the worst case 24-hour 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 138 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

daily average nitrogen feed rate of 1,085 pounds per hour that 

formed the basis of the NOx BACT limit. 

(c) Immediate Reporting Requirements 

The reporting requirements in the NESHAP General Provisions for Startup, Shutdown 

and Malfunction (SSM) Plans [40 CFR 63.6(e)(3)] shall be used to satisfy the reporting 

requirements under the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1259(a)(3)], Offsite 

Waste MACT standards [40 CFR 63.697(b)(3)], and PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 

2-1.1-11]. 

(1) The Permittee shall report all actions taken during an RTO system SSM event 

that results in an exceedance of a relevant emission standard when those 

actions are inconsistent with the procedures specified in the SSM Plan. The 

immediate report shall be submitted to the agency via a telephone call or 

facsimile within 2 working days after commencing actions inconsistent with the 

plan. 

(2) Within 7 working days after the end of an SSM event where an action taken by 

the Permittee is not consistent with the procedures specified in the SSM Plan, 

the Permittee shall submit a letter containing the following information in 

accordance with 40 CFR 63.10(d)(5): 

(A) Name, title and signature of responsible official certifying accuracy; 

(B) Explanation of the circumstances of the event; 

(C) Reason for not following the SSM Plan; and 

(D) Report any excess emissions and/or parameter monitoring exceedances 

are believed to have occurred. 

Modifications and Construction Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-10.5, 326 IAC 2-7-12 and 326 IAC 2-2] 

D.14.11 Modifications and Construction: Advance approval of permit conditions 

(a) The Permittee may modify any existing emission units listed in this section of the permit 

without obtaining a source modification approval (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-

10.5), a Title V permit modification (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-2), 

provided the modified emission units are subject to the same applicable requirements 

listed in this D section, and the Permittee shall comply with the Change Management and 

Flexible Permit provisions in Section F.1 of this permit. 

(b) The Permittee may construct and install new emission units comparable in function to the 

emission units listed in this D section without obtaining a source modification approval 

(otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-10.5), a Title V permit modification (otherwise 

required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit 

(otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-2), provided the new emission units are subject to the 

same applicable requirements listed in this D section, and the Permittee shall comply with 

the Change Management and Flexible Permit provisions in Section F.1 of this permit. 

The remainder of the page is left blank intentionally. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 139 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION D.15 BPM CONTROL SYSTEMS – T79 FUME INCINERATOR SYSTEM OPERATIONS 

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The information describing the processes contained in the following facility description is descriptive 

information and does not constitute enforceable conditions: 

(a) The following emissions units are subject to applicable requirements described in this D section: 

Emission 

Unit ID Emission Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity 

Control 

Device 

T79-INC309 Fume Incinerator T79-INC309 7.6 MMBtu/hr Scrubber (313)

T79-INC310 Fume Incinerator T79-INC310 7.6 MMBtu/hr Scrubber (314)

(b) The following emission units are not subject to applicable requirements described in this D 

section: 

Emission 

Unit ID Emission Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity 

Control 

Device 

T79-COL304 Air Stripper Column T79 Incinerator 4,400 gallons T79 Incinerator

T79-COL305 Air Stripper Column T79 Incinerator 4,400 gallons T79 Incinerator

The T79 control system consists of two fume incinerators, identified as 309 and 310, each 

equipped with caustic scrubbing systems, and each exhausting to individual stacks. 

The closed vent system (CVS) associated with the T79 control system begins at the outlet of the 

production building roof fans exhausting to the T79 fume transport system and at the outlet side 

of the tank conservation vents of those tank modules exhausting to the T79 fume transport 

system and ends at the entrance of the T79 control system. 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.15.0 Requirement to Control Emissions [40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb, 40 CFR 63 Subpart GGG, 40 CFR 63 

Subpart DD, 326 IAC 2-2-3, and 326 IAC 8-5-3] 

Except for equipment excluded from emission control requirements and except as otherwise 

provided by statute or rule, or in this permit, the fumes from all emission units which reference 

this section shall be continuously routed to the T79 control system while emission units vented to 

the control equipment are in operation. Except as otherwise provided by statute or rule, or in 

this permit, the T79 control system shall be operated at all times that the emission units vented to 

the control equipment are in operation. 

D.15.1 T79 Control Device and Closed Vent System Standards [40 CFR 63.1253(b), (c), and (d), 

63.1254(a) and (c), 63.1256(b), (e), and (h), 63.1258(b), 40 CFR 63.685(c) and (d), 63.689(b), 

63.690(b), 63.693(f), 40 CFR 60.112b(a) and 60.113b(c), 326 IAC 2-2-3, and 326 IAC 8-5-3(b)] 

(a) T79 Control Device Standards – The T79 control device standards shall apply at all times 

the unit is burning waste fume streams, except as provided in Condition D.15.2 (a): 

(1) VOC/VOHAP Emission Standards – In order to satisfy the Pharmaceutical MACT 

requirements [40 CFR 63.1253(b), (c), and (d), 63.1254(a) and (c), and 

63.1256(b), (e) and (h), and 63.1258(b)], the Offsite Waste and Recovery 

Operations MACT requirements [40 CFR 63.685(c) and (d), 63.689(b), 

63.690(b), and 63.693(f)], the PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3], the 

Synthetic Pharmaceutical RACT requirements [326 IAC 8-5-3(b)], and the New 

Source Performance Standards for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessel 

requirements [40 CFR 60.112b(a) and 60.113b(c)], the Permittee shall meet the 

following streamlined VOC/VOHAP emission standards: 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 140 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(A) The VOC/VOHAP emissions shall be reduced by a control efficiency of 

98% or more at the outlet of the T79 control system; 

(B) The T79 combustion chamber shall maintain a minimum 24-hour daily 

average temperature established from a compliant stack test. 

(2) Hydrogen halide and halogen Emission Standards – In order to satisfy the 

Pharmaceutical MACT requirements [40 CFR 63.1253(b), (c), and (d), 

63.1254(a) and (c), 63.1256(b), (e) and (h), and 63.1258(b)] and PSD BACT 

requirements for fluorides [326 IAC 2-2-3], the Permittee shall meet the following 

streamlined hydrogen halide and halogen (including hydrogen fluoride) emission 

standards: 

(A) The HCl/Cl2 emissions shall be reduced by a control efficiency of 98% or 

more at the outlet of the T79 system; and 

(B) The T79 caustic scrubber system shall maintain the following parametric 

conditions established from a compliant stack test: 

(i) Minimum 24-hour daily average scrubber liquid pH; 

(ii) Minimum 24-hour daily average scrubber liquid recirculation flow 

rate; and 

(iii) Maximum 24-hour daily average scrubber caustic flow rate. 

(b) T79 Closed Vent System Inspection Standards – The following inspection standards shall 

apply to the T79 CVS, except as provided in Condition D.15.2 (b): 

(1) The Permittee shall comply with the following CVS inspection requirements to 

satisfy the Pharmaceutical MACT requirements [40 CFR 63.1256(b)(3) and (e)(1) 

and 63.1258(h)], the Offsite Waste MACT requirements [40 CFR 63.685(g), 

63.689(b), 63.690(b), 63.693(b) and (c), and 63.695(c)], and the PSD BACT 

requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3]: 

(A) Conduct an initial one-time Method 21 inspection on new portions of the 

T79 CVS not operated under negative pressure and not subject to LDAR 

within 150 days after startup. Portions of the T79 CVS that are operated 

under negative pressure shall be equipped with a pressure gauge or 

other pressure measurement/detection. The data output from the must 

be viewable from a readily accessible location to verify that negative 

pressure is being maintained when waste fume streams are going to the 

control system. 

(B) Perform annual visual inspections of the T79 CVS for visible cracks, 

holes or gaps, loose connections, and broken or missing caps. 

(C) Initiate repair of any leak detected on the T79 CVS no later than 5 

calendar days after identification, and complete the repair within 15 days 

after identification, unless: 

(i) The repair is technically infeasible without a shutdown of an 

operation or process; or 

(ii) It is determined that emissions resulting from immediate repair 

would be greater than the fugitive emissions likely to result from 

delay of repair. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 141 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Repairs delayed due to either of the causes described in (A) or (B) shall 

be completed by the end of the next shutdown. 

(2) The Permittee shall monitor each bypass line on the T79 CVS to satisfy the 

Pharmaceutical MACT requirements [40 CFR 63.1252(b), 63.1253(b) and (c), 

and 63.1258(b)], the Offsite Waste MACT requirements [40 CFR 63.685(g), 

63.689(b), 63.690(b), and 63.693(c)], and the PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 

2-2-3] using one of the following methods: 

(A) Install and monitor the position of the T79 CVS bypass valve at least 

once every 15 minutes, where the closed position means there is no 

bypass flow; or 

(B) Secure the bypass line valve in the closed position with a car seal or lock 

and key type configuration. Monthly visual inspections of seal or locking 

device shall be performed to ensure the seal is not broken or the valve is 

in the closed position and the vent stream is not diverted through the 

bypass line. 

D.15.2 Exceptions to T79 Control System Standards [40 CFR 63.1260(g), 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3) and 

63.8(c), and 40 CFR 63.681, 63.685(g), 63.693(b) and 326 IAC 2-2-3] 

(a) Exceptions to T79 Control Device Operational Standards – The following streamlined 

standards satisfy the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1260(g)], Offsite 

Waste MACT standards [40 CFR 63.681, 63.685(g) and 63.693(b)], and PSD BACT 

requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3]: 

(1) The Permittee may open a safety device and bypass the T79 system at any time 

conditions require it to do so to avoid unsafe conditions. 

(2) The provisions of Conditions D.15.1 (a) shall not apply during periods of startup, 

shutdown or malfunction that preclude the Permittee from complying with 

Condition D.15.1 (a), provided the Permittee complies with the provisions of the 

startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan (SSM Plan) required by Condition 

D.15.3. 

(b) Exceptions to T79 CVS Inspection Standards – The following streamlined standards 

satisfy the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1258(h)(6) and (7)], and PSD 

BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3]: 

(1) The Permittee is not required to inspect if unsafe or difficult to inspect. 

D.15.3 Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction Requirements for T79 Control System [40 CFR 

63.1259(a)(3), 40 CFR 63.697(b)(3), 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3), 40 CFR 63.8(c) and 326 IAC 2-2-3] 

(a) The NESHAP General Provisions for Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction (SSM) Plans 

[40 CFR 63.6(e)(3)] shall be used to satisfy the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 

CFR 63.1259(a)(3)], Offsite Waste MACT standards [40 CFR 63.697(b)(3)], and PSD 

BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-2.1.11]. 

(b) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3), the Permittee shall develop an SSM Plan to ensure that 

the T79 fume incinerator control system, including associated CEMS and CMS 

equipment, is operated and maintained in a manner which satisfies the general duty to 

minimize emissions established by 40 CFR 63.6(e)(1)(i), and that all malfunctions are 

corrected as soon as practicable after their occurrence in order to minimize excess 

emissions. The SSM Plan shall contain the following information: 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 142 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(1) Detailed procedures for operating and maintaining the T79 system, including 

associated CEMS and CMS equipment, during periods of startup, shutdown, and 

malfunction; and 

(2) Corrective action program for malfunctioning air pollution control equipment. 

Compliance Determination Requirements 

D.15.4 Requirement to Control Emissions [40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb, 40 CFR 63 Subpart GGG, 40 CFR 63 

Subpart DD, 326 IAC 2-2-3, and 326 IAC 8-5-3] 

Except for equipment excluded from emission control requirements and except as otherwise 

provided by statute or rule or in this permit, the T79 control system shall be operated at all times 

that the emission units vented to the control equipment are in operation. 

Testing and Monitoring Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-6(1) (6)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.15.5 Performance Testing Requirements [40 CFR 60.113b(c), 40 CFR 63.7, 40 CFR 63.1257(b), (c), 

and (d) and 63.1258(b)(3), 40 CFR 63.693(f), 326 IAC 3-6-3(c), and 326 IAC 2-1.1-11] 

(a) Initial Comprehensive Performance Test Requirements: 

(1) VOC/VOHAP Performance Test Requirements – The following streamlined 

requirements satisfy the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1257(b), 

(c), and (d) and 63.1258(b)], Offsite Waste MACT standards [40 CFR 63.693(f)], 

Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessel requirements [40 CFR 60.113b(c)], PSD 

BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11], and emission testing requirements for 

MACT sources [326 IAC 3-6-3(c)]: 

(A) The Permittee shall conduct an initial performance test in accordance 

with the methods set forth in 40 CFR 63.1257. 

(B) The Permittee shall submit a notification of the performance test and a 

site-specific test plan at least 60 days in advance of the intended 

performance test date. 

(C) The operating parameters defined in Condition D.15.1 (a)(1) shall be 

monitored during the performance test to establish the 24-hour daily 

average parametric limits, according to the requirements of 40 CFR 

63.1258(b)(3). 

(D) The Permittee shall submit the performance test reports, and upon 

request, the CMS performance evaluation, within 45 days following the 

test. The Permittee is allowed an extension of 15 days if a reasonable 

explanation is provided within 40 days following the test. 

(2) Hydrogen Chloride Performance Test Requirements – The following 

requirements satisfy the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1258(b)] 

and the PSD BACT requirements for fluorides [326 IAC 2-1.1-11]: 

(A) The Permittee shall conduct a performance test to determine the 

hydrogen halides and halogens control efficiency standard, which 

includes fluorides, and conduct an initial performance test in accordance 

with the methods set forth in 40 CFR 63.1257. 

(B) The Permittee shall submit a notification of the performance test and a 

site-specific test plan at least 60 days in advance of the intended 

performance test date. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 143 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(C) The operating parameters defined in Condition D.15.1 (a)(2) shall be 

monitored during the performance test to establish the 24-hour daily 

average parametric limits, according to the requirements of 40 CFR 

63.1258(b)(3). 

(D) The Permittee shall submit the performance test reports, and upon 

request, the CMS performance evaluation, within 45 days following the 

test. The Permittee is allowed an extension of 15 days if a reasonable 

explanation is provided within 40 days following the test. 

(b) Subsequent Comprehensive Performance Test Requirements: 

The Permittee shall repeat the performance tests for VOC/VOHAP and Hydrogen 

Halide/Halogens at least once every five years from the date of the most recent valid 

compliance demonstration. 

D.15.6 Parametric Continuous Monitoring System (CMS) Requirements [40 CFR 63.8(c), 40 CFR 

60.113b(c), 40 CFR 63.1257(b), 63.1258(a) and (b), and 63.1260(e), 40 CFR 63.693(b), 326 IAC 

2-1.1-11, and 326 IAC 3-5-5(d)] 

(a) VOC/VOHAP CMS Requirements - The following streamlined requirements apply only 

when burning waste fume streams to satisfy the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 

CFR 63.1258(a) and (b)], Offsite Waste MACT standards [40 CFR 63.684(e)(1)], Volatile 

Organic Liquid Storage Vessel requirements [40 CFR 60.113b(c)], and PSD BACT 

requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11]: 

(1) T79 Combustion Chamber Temperature – The Permittee shall install and operate 

the T79 combustion chamber temperature CMS in accordance with 40 CFR 

63.8(c). 

(2) Continuous operation is defined as the collection of at least one measurement for 

each successive 15-minute period. 

(b) Hydrogen Halide/Halogen and Fluorides CMS Requirements – The following 

requirements apply only when burning waste fume streams to satisfy the Pharmaceutical 

MACT standards for hydrogen halides and halogens [40 CFR 63.1257(b), 63.1258(b), 

and 63.1260(e)] and the PSD BACT requirements for fluorides [326 IAC 2-1.1-11]: 

(1) The Permittee shall install and operate the following CMSs in accordance with 40 

CFR 63.8(c): 

(A) Scrubber liquid pH monitor; 

(B) Scrubber liquid recirculation flow rate monitor; and 

(C) Scrubber caustic flow rate monitor. 

(2) Continuous operation is defined as the collection of at least one measurement for 

each successive 15-minute period. 

(c) CMS Quality Control Program – The Permittee shall prepare and implement a quality 

control program for the CMS units in accordance with 40 CFR 63.8(d). 

D.15.7 Excursions [40 CFR 63.1258(b)(6)] 

(a) Pursuant to the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1258(b)(7)] and the Offsite 

Waste MACT [40 CFR 63.695(e)(4)], and to satisfy the monitoring for the BACT 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 144 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

requirement [326 IAC 2-1.1-11], excursions are defined as follows and apply to the 

CEMS and CMS required by Condition D.15.5: 

(1) When the period of control device operation (i.e., receiving waste fume streams) 

is 4 hours or greater in an operating day and monitoring data are insufficient to 

constitute a valid hour of data for at least 75 percent of the operating hours. 

(2) When the period of control device operation (i.e., receiving waste fume streams) 

is less than 4 hours in an operating day and more than one of the hours during 

the period of operation does not constitute a valid hour of data due to insufficient 

monitoring data. 

(b) A valid hour requires at least one data point for each 15-minute period in the operating 

hour. 

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirement [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-19] 

D.15.8 Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements 

(a) Record Keeping Requirements 

The Permittee shall maintain the following records: 

(1) Control Device (T79) Records – The Pharmaceutical MACT record keeping 

requirements [40 CFR 63.1259] shall serve as the streamlined requirement that 

satisfies the Offsite Waste MACT standards [40 CFR 63.696], Volatile Organic 

Liquid Storage Vessel requirements [40 CFR 60.115b], PSD BACT requirements 

[326 IAC 2-1.1-11], and continuous emission monitoring and performance testing 

requirements [326 IAC 3-5 and 3-6]: 

(A) Records of the current and superseded versions of SSM Plan; 

(B) Description of worst-case operating conditions; 

(C) Results of control device performance tests and CMS performance 

evaluations; 

(D) Records of all required CMS data; 

(E) Records of each CMS calibration checks; 

(F) Maintenance records for each control device and CMSs; 

(G) Occurrence/duration records of each control device malfunction and 

CMS malfunction; 

(H) Information to demonstrate conformance with each SSM are consistent 

with procedures in the SSM Plan; 

(I) Records of actions taken during each SSM when different from SSM 

Plan; and 

(J) Record of the current standard operating procedure (SOP) for the T79 

CMS units. 

(2) Closed Vent System (T79 CVS) Records – The Pharmaceutical MACT record 

keeping requirements [40 CFR 63.1259] shall serve as the streamlined 

requirement that satisfies the Offsite Waste MACT standards [40 CFR 63.696], 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 145 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessel requirements [40 CFR 60.115b], PSD 

BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-1.1-11], and continuous emission monitoring and 

performance testing requirements [326 IAC 3-5 and 3-6]: 

(A) Hourly records of bypass flow indicator operating status and the time and 

duration of all diversions detected by the bypass flow indicator, if 

complying via this method; 

(B) Monthly visual inspection records of bypass line valves and the 

occurrence of all periods the valve position has changed, if complying via 

this method; 

(C) For each portion of the CVS not operated under negative pressure, 

record each component that is unsafe to inspect, and a plan for 

inspecting the component as frequently as practicable during safe-toinspect times; 

(D) For each portion of the CVS not operated under negative pressure, 

record each component that is difficult to inspect and a written plan for 

inspecting the component at least once every five years; 

(E) For each part of the CVS not operated under negative pressure, record 

the following information if no leaks are detected during the initial Method 

21 inspection or annual visual inspections: 

(i) Date each inspection was performed; and 

(ii) Statement for each inspection that no leaks were detected. 

(F) For each part of the CVS not operated under negative pressure, record 

the following information for all leaks detected during the initial Method 

21 inspection: 

(i) Identification of leaking equipment; 

(ii) Instrument ID and operator name or initials; 

(iii) Date the leak was detected and date of first attempt to repair 

leak; 

(iv) Maximum instrument reading after leak from initial Method 21 is 

successfully repaired or declared non-repairable; and 

(v) Record of reason for any delay of repair, name of person 

responsible for decision, expected date of repair, dates of 

shutdowns when repair is made and date of successful repair of 

leak. 

(G) For each part of the CVS not operated under negative pressure, record 

the following information for all leaks detected from the annual visual 

inspection: 

(i) Identification of leaking equipment; 

(ii) Date leak was detected and first attempt to repair leak; and 

(iii) Record of reason for any delay of repair, name of person 

responsible for decision, expected date of repair, dates of 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 146 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

shutdowns when repair is made and date of successful repair of 

leak. 

(b) Quarterly Periodic Reporting Requirements 

(1) The following Pharmaceutical MACT reporting requirements [40 CFR 

63.1260(g)], which references the MACT General Provisions [40 CFR 63.7 – 

63.10], shall serve as the streamlined reporting requirements that satisfy the 

Offsite Waste MACT standards [40 CFR 63.697], Volatile Organic Liquid Storage 

Vessel requirements [40 CFR 60.115b], PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-

1.1-11], and continuous emission monitoring requirements [326 IAC 3-5]: 

(A) Reports shall be submitted within 30 days following the reporting period 

using the reporting forms located at the end of this permit, or their 

equivalent; 

(B) If total duration of excess emissions, parameter exceedances, or 

excursions is 1% or greater of total operating time or total CMS 

downtime is greater than 5% for reporting period, include: 

(i) 15-minute data and daily averages for all operating days out of 

range; 

(ii) duration of excursions; and 

(iii) operating logs and scenarios for all operating days out of range; 

(C) Summary reports of excess emissions, parameter exceedances, and 

monitor downtime including information specified in 63.10(c)(5)-(c)(13); 

(D) Report, when applicable, no excess emissions, no exceedances, no 

excursions, and no CMS have been inoperative, out of control, repaired 

or adjusted; 

(E) CVS bypass lines with flow indicator: report all periods when vent stream 

is diverted from control device through bypass line; 

(F) CVS with bypass lines without flow indicator: report periods which seal 

mechanism is broken, position has changed or key to unlock bypass line 

valve was checked out; 

(G) Report each new operating scenario that has been operated since last 

report; 

(H) SSM summary reports for the T79 control system, including associated 

CEMS and CMS equipment. 

(c) Immediate Reporting Requirements 

The reporting requirements in the NESHAP General Provisions for Startup, Shutdown 

and Malfunction (SSM) Plans [40 CFR 63.6(e)(3)] shall be used to satisfy the reporting 

requirements under the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1259(a)(3)], Offsite 

Waste MACT standards [40 CFR 63.697(b)(3)], and PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 

2-1.1-11]. 

(1) The Permittee shall report all actions taken during a T79 system SSM event that 

results in an exceedance of a relevant emission standard when those actions are 

inconsistent with the procedures specified in the SSM Plan. The immediate 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 147 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

report shall be submitted to the agency via a telephone call or facsimile within 2 

working days after commencing actions inconsistent with the plan. 

(2) Within 7 working days after the end of an SSM event where an action taken by 

the Permittee is not consistent with the procedures specified in the SSM Plan, 

the Permittee shall submit a letter containing the following information in 

accordance with 40 CFR 63.10(d)(5): 

(A) Name, title and signature of responsible official certifying accuracy; 

(B) Explanation of the circumstances for the event; 

(C) Reason for not following the SSM Plan; and 

(D) Report any excess emissions and/or parameter monitoring exceedances 

are believed to have occurred. 

Modifications and Construction Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-10.5, 326 IAC 2-7-12 and 326 IAC 2-2] 

D.15.9 Modifications and Construction: Advance approval of permit conditions 

(a) The Permittee may modify any existing emission units listed in this section of the permit 

without obtaining a source modification approval (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-

10.5), a Title V permit modification (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-2), 

provided the modified emission units are subject to the same applicable requirements 

listed in this D section, and the Permittee shall comply with the Change Management and 

Flexible Permit provisions in Section F.1 of this permit. 

(b) The Permittee may construct and install new emission units comparable in function to the 

emission units listed in this D section without obtaining a source modification approval 

(otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-10.5), a Title V permit modification (otherwise 

required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit 

(otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-2), provided the new emission units are subject to the 

same applicable requirements listed in this D section, and the Permittee shall comply with 

the Change Management and Flexible Permit provisions in Section F.1 of this permit. 

The remainder of the page is left blank intentionally. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 148 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION D.16 BPM SUPPORT OPERATIONS – RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OPERATIONS 

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The information describing the processes contained in the facility description boxes is descriptive 

information and does not constitute enforceable conditions: 

(a) The emission units listed below are insignificant activities as defined in 326 IAC 2-7-1(21), but are 

subject to applicable requirements described or referred to in this D section. 

Emission 

Unit ID Emission Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity 

Control 

Device 

Building T71: 

31A985DUCHT4 Charge Tank Atmosphere 10 gal None 

TI0031000MS001 Slurry Mill Atmosphere NA None 

T46109 Slurry Mill Atmosphere NA None 

T69126 Centrifuge Atmosphere 5 liters None 

T63150 Plate Filter Atmosphere 0.15 m3 None 

T44224 Filter Dryer Atmosphere NA None 

T71-TK5700 Waste Tank Atmosphere 1000 gallons None 

T71-TK9601 Portable Process Tank Atmosphere 50 gallons None 

T71-TK9602 Portable Process Tank Atmosphere 50 gallons None 

T71-TK9605 Portable Process Tank Atmosphere 30 gallons None 

T71-TK9606 Portable Process Tank Atmosphere 50 gallons None 

T71-TK9609 Portable Process Tank Atmosphere 30 gallons None 

T71-TK9610 Portable Process Tank Atmosphere 50 gallons None 

T71-TK9611 Portable Process Tank Atmosphere 50 gallons None 

T71-TK9612 Portable Process Tank Atmosphere 50 gallons None 

T71-TK9613 Condensate Collection Tank Atmosphere 10 gallons None 

T71-TK9614 Condensate Collection Tank Atmosphere 10 gallons None 

T71-TK9615 Condensate Collection Tank Atmosphere 10 gallons None 

T71-TK9616 Condensate Collection Tank Atmosphere 10 gallons None 

T71-TK9617 Condensate Collection Tank Atmosphere 20 gallons None 

T71-TK9623 Charge Tank Atmosphere 10 gallons None 

T71-TK9624 Charge Tank Atmosphere 10 gallons None 

T71-TK9625 Charge Tank Atmosphere 10 gallons None 

T71-TK9626 Charge Tank Atmosphere 10 gallons None 

T71-RVD9801 Rotary Vacuum Dryer Atmosphere 3 cubic feet None 

T71-FLT9901 Single-Plate Filter Atmosphere N/A None 

T71-FLT9902 Multi-Plate Filter Atmosphere N/A None 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.16.1 Non-Applicability Determination [40 CFR 63, Subpart GGG and 326 IAC 8-5-3] 

(a) The emission units listed above are not subject to the requirements of 40 CFR 63, 

Subpart GGG (Pharmaceutical MACT Standards) because these operations are research 

and development facilities that are exempt pursuant to 40 CFR 63.1250(d) and 63.1251. 

(b) The emission units listed above are not subject to the requirements of 326 IAC 8-5-3 

because the potential to emit VOC of any facility is less than 15 pounds per day. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 149 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

D.16.2 Reserved 

D.16.3 Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) for Fugitive Emissions [CP157-4148 (Revised by this permit)] 

The LDAR standards that apply to components associated with the process operations in Building 

T71are described in Section E.1 of this permit and the waste tank in T71 are described in Section 

E.2 of this permit. 

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-5(3) and 326 IAC 2-7-19] 

D.16.4 Reserved 

Modifications and Construction Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-10.5, 326 IAC 2-7-12 and 326 IAC 2-2] 

D.16.5 Modifications and Construction: Advance Approval of Permit Conditions Requirements 

The emission units described in this D section are not subject to the advance approval permit 

conditions. 

The remainder of the page is left blank intentionally. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 150 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION D.17 BPM SUPPORT OPERATIONS – GENERAL WASTEWATER CONDITIONS 

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The information describing the processes contained in the following facility description boxes is 

descriptive information and does not constitute enforceable conditions. 

(a) BPM Wastewater Operations – The emission units associated with the BPM wastewater 

operations can generally be described as storage and transfer facilities (wastewater tanks, 

containers and individual drain systems) and treatment facilities (chemical wastewater treatment 

plant, incineration, or offsite treatment). The specific emission units are described in Sections 

D.8, D.10, D.11, D.12, D.13, D.18 and D.19 of this permit. 

(b) Fermented Products Wastewater Operations – The emission units associated with the fermented 

products wastewater operations can generally be described as storage and transfer facilities 

(biosolids tanks) and treatment facilities (biological wastewater treatment plant. The specific 

emission units are described in Section D.5 of this permit. The wastewater operations associated 

with fermented products are not subject to the storage, transfer and treatment requirements of 

this section of the permit because the wastewater does not meet the definition of an affected 

wastewater. 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.17.1 Definition of Wastewater [40 CFR 63.1251 and 40 CFR 63.1256(a)(1)(i)] 

(a) Wastewater in this section of the permit is defined as any water that is discarded from a 

pharmaceutical manufacturing process unit through a single point of determination (POD) 

that contains an annual average concentration of partially soluble and/or soluble HAP 

compounds of at least 5 parts per million by weight and a load of at least 0.05 kg/yr. 

Wastewater does not include the following: 

(1) Stormwater from segregated sewers; 

(2) Water from fire-fighting and deluge systems, including testing of such systems; 

(3) Spills; 

(4) Water from safety showers; 

(5) Samples of a size not greater than reasonably necessary for the method of 

analysis that is used; 

(6) Equipment leaks; 

(7) Wastewater drips from procedures such as disconnecting hoses after clearing 

lines; 

(8) Noncontact cooling water; and 

(9) Primary waste (waste with a net positive heating value). 

(b) Point of determination (POD) is defined as the point where a wastewater stream exits the 

process, storage tank, or last recovery device. If soluble and/or partially soluble HAP 

compounds are not recovered from water before discharge, the discharge point from the 

process equipment or storage tank is a POD. If water streams are routed to a recovery 

device, the discharge from the recovery device is a POD. There can be more than one 

POD per process or pharmaceutical manufacturing process unit. [40 CFR 63.1251] 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 151 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(c) Affected wastewater is defined as follows: 

(1) Any wastewater stream containing partially soluble HAP compounds at an annual 

average concentration greater than 1300 ppmw, and the total soluble and 

partially soluble HAP load in all wastewater from the PMPU exceeds 0.25 Mg/yr; 

or [40 CFR 63.1256(a)(1)(i)(A)] 

(2) Any wastewater stream containing partially soluble and/or soluble HAP 

compounds at an annual average concentration greater than 5200 ppmw, and 

the total soluble and partially soluble HAP load in all wastewater from the PMPU 

exceeds 0.25 Mg/yr. [40 CFR 63.1256(a)(1)(i)(B)] 

Maintenance wastewater is not considered an affected wastewater stream. 

D.17.2 Maintenance Wastewater [40 CFR 63.1256(a)(4)(iii)] 

The Permittee shall prepare a maintenance wastewater plan and implement this plan as part of 

the Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction (SSM) Plan for maintenance wastewater as required 

under 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3). [40 CFR 63.1256(a)(4)(iii)] 

D.17.3 Storage and Transfer of Affected Wastewater [40 CFR 63.1256(b), (d), and (e)] 

(a) The following emission units are used to store or transfer affected wastewater from the 

BPM operations: 

(1) BPM Containers – The emission units and performance standards are described 

in Section D.11 of this permit. 

(2) BPM Individual Drain Systems – These emission units and performance 

standards for the individual drain systems are described in Section D.8 of this 

permit. 

(3) Affected Wastewater Tanks – These emission units and performance standards 

are streamlined with the requirements for BPM waste tanks described in Section 

D.10 of this permit. 

(b) The emission units in the fermented products operations do not store or transfer affected 

wastewater. 

D.17.4 Treatment of Affected Wastewater [40 CFR 63.1256] 

Pursuant to the Pharmaceutical MACT requirements under 40 CFR 63.1256, the affected 

wastewater and residuals shall be treated using the following methods as applicable: 

(a) Enhanced biological treatment system – The equipment and performance standards for 

the treatment of affected wastewater using the enhanced biological treatment system are 

described in Section D.18 of this permit. 

(b) Waste incineration – The equipment and performance standards for the thermal 

destruction of the affected wastewater by incineration are described in Sections D.12 and 

D.13 of this permit. 

(c) Transfer of affected wastewater streams for offsite treatment – The performance 

standards for offsite disposal of affected wastewater are described in Section D.19 of this 

permit. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 152 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Testing and Monitoring Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-6(1) (6)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.17.5 Testing and Monitoring Requirements 

The requirements for the storage, transfer and treatment of the affected wastewater are 

described in Sections D.8, D.10, D.11, D.12, D.13, D.18 and D.19 of this permit. 

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements 

D.17.6 Record keeping and Reporting Requirements 

(a) The following record keeping and reporting requirements apply to the maintenance 

wastewater plan required under 40 CFR 63.1256(a)(4)(iv) and 63.6(e)(3): 

(1) Maintain record of original maintenance wastewater plan for the life of the 

affected source or until the affected source is no longer subject to the provisions 

of this rule; 

(2) Maintain updated versions of the maintenance wastewater plan, as necessary; 

(3) Maintain records for each instance the plan was implemented and whether the 

plan was followed; and 

(4) Record and report all instances within 2 working days after commencing actions 

inconsistent with the SSM plan followed by a written letter within 7 working days 

after the end of the event. 

(b) Each POD as defined in Condition D.17.1 (b) shall be identified and its wastewater HAP 

concentration documented in the On-Site Implementation Log (OSIL) as required by 40 

CFR 63.1259(b)(6) and 40 CFR 63.1251 – Operating Scenario. 

The remainder of the page is left blank intentionally. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 153 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION D.18 BPM SUPPORT OPERATIONS – CHEMICAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 

CONDITIONS

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The information describing the processes contained in the following facility description boxes is 

descriptive information and does not constitute enforceable conditions: 

(a) The following emission units are subject to applicable requirements described or referred to in 

this D section. These emission units represent the enhanced biological treatment system. 

Emission 

Unit ID Emission Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity 

Control 

Device 

BPM Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP): 

T78-TK511 Activated Sludge Tank Atmosphere 8 million gallons N/A 

T78-TK512 Activated Sludge Tank Atmosphere 8 million gallons N/A 

(b) The following emission units of the wastewater treatment system are not subject to applicable 

requirements described in this D section. 

Emission 

Unit ID Emission Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity 

Control 

Device 

BPM Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP): 

T78-TK520A* Clarifier Atmosphere 1.4 million gallons N/A 

T78-TK520B* Clarifier Atmosphere 1.4 million gallons N/A 

T78-TK520C* Clarifier Atmosphere 1.4 million gallons N/A 

T78-TK522* Thickener Atmosphere 1.4 million gallons N/A 

T78-TK550* Emergency Diversion Tank Atmosphere 900,000 gallons N/A 

T78-TK551* Sludge Collection Tank Atmosphere 700,000 gallons N/A 

TK525* Sludge Tank Atmosphere 193,000 gallons N/A 

TK526* Sludge Tank Atmosphere 193,000 gallons N/A 

* Emission units marked with an asterisk are insignificant activities as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(21)(A)-(C) 

and 326 IAC 2-7-1(21)(G)(ix)(AA). 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.18.1 Pharmaceutical MACT Standards [40 CFR 63.1256] 

(a) Pursuant to the Pharmaceutical MACT standards for wastewater [40 CFR 

63.1256(g)(10)], the Permittee may use the enhanced biological treatment system 

(activated sludge tank T78-TK511 or T78-TK512) to treat affected wastewater streams, 

defined in Section D.17 of this permit, except: 

(1) Mixed (soluble and partially soluble HAP) wastewater streams greater than 5200 

ppmw, where the partially soluble HAP component is equal to or greater than 50 

ppmw; or 

(2) Wastewater streams containing combined partially soluble HAPs greater than 

1300 ppmw. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 154 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(b) Pursuant to the Pharmaceutical MACT standards for wastewater [40 CFR 63.1251 and 

40 CFR 63.1256(g)(10)], the Permittee shall maintain a minimum mixed liquor volatile 

suspended solids (biomass) concentration of 1 kg/cubic meter (942 mg/l) of the mixed 

liquor in the enhanced biological treatment system. 

Testing and Monitoring Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-6(1) (6)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.18.2 Sampling and Analysis Requirements [40 CFR 63.1258(g)(2)] 

Pursuant to the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1258(g)(2)], the Permittee shall 

measure the following parameters for each enhanced biological treatment unit in use at least 

once per week and record the weekly average data: 

(a) Total suspended solids (TSS), chemical oxygen demand (COD); and 

(b) Biomass (VSS) concentration. 

Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-19] 

D.18.3 Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements 

(a) The Permittee shall maintain the sampling and analysis records required by Condition 

D.18.2 in accordance with the Pharmaceutical MACT record keeping requirements [40 

CFR 63.1259(b)(1)]. 

Modifications and Construction Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-10.5, 326 IAC 2-7-12 and 326 IAC 2-2] 

D.18.4 Modifications and Construction: Advance Approval of Permit Conditions Requirements 

The emission units described in this D section are not subject to the advance approval permit 

conditions. 

The remainder of the page is left blank intentionally. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 155 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

 

SECTION D.19 BPM SUPPORT OPERATIONS – TRANSFER OF AFFECTED WASTEWATER FOR 

OFFSITE TREATMENT CONDITIONS 

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The information in this facility description section does not constitute enforceable conditions. The transfer 

of affected wastewater for offsite treatment relates to either of the following situations: 

(a) Shipment of affected wastewater generated onsite to an offsite treatment facility; or 

(b) Receipt of an offsite affected wastewater to be treated onsite. 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.19.1 Shipment of Affected Wastewater to an Offsite Treatment Facility [40 CFR 63.1256(a)(5)] 

(a) Pursuant to the Pharmaceutical MACT standards for wastewater [40 CFR 

63.1256(a)(5)(i)(B)], the Permittee shall include a notice with each shipment of affected 

wastewater or residual removed from affected wastewater to an offsite treatment facility. 

The notice shall state that the affected wastewater or residual contains organic HAP must 

be treated in accordance with the treatment requirements of the Pharmaceutical MACT 

standards. When the transport is continuous or ongoing, the notice shall be submitted to 

the treatment operator initially and whenever there is a change in the required treatment. 

(b) Pursuant to the Pharmaceutical MACT standards for wastewater [40 CFR 

63.1256(a)(5)(ii)], the Permittee shall not transfer the affected wastewater or residual 

unless the transferee has submitted to the EPA a written certification that the transferee 

will manage and treat any affected wastewater or residual removed from affected 

wastewater received from a source subject to the requirements of this subpart in 

accordance with the treatment requirements of the Pharmaceutical MACT standards. 

D.19.2 Receipt of Offsite Affected Wastewater for Onsite Treatment [40 CFR 63.1256(a)(5)] 

(a) Where the Permittee is the transferee, the Permittee shall submit to EPA a written 

certification that it will manage and treat any affected wastewater or residual removed 

from affected wastewater received from a source subject to the requirements of this 

subpart in accordance with the treatment requirements of the Pharmaceutical MACT 

standards for wastewater [40 CFR 63.1256(a)(5)(ii) and (iv)]. 

(b) The Permittee may revoke its certification as allowed under 40 CFR 63.1256(a)(5)(iii). 

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-19] 

D.19.3 Record keeping and Reporting Requirements 

(a) The Permittee shall keep records of all notifications required by Conditions D.19.1 and 

D.19.2 in accordance with 40 CFR 63.1259(g). 

Modifications and Construction Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-10.5, 326 IAC 2-7-12 and 326 IAC 2-2] 

D.19.4 Modifications and Construction: Advance Approval of Permit Conditions 

The emission units described in this D section are not subject to the advance approval permit 

conditions. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 156 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION D.20 FACILITY OPERATION CONDITIONS 

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The information describing the processes contained in the following facility description boxes is 

descriptive information and does not constitute enforceable conditions: 

(a) The following emissions units are subject to applicable requirements described in this D 

section: 

Emissions 

Unit ID 

Emissions Unit 

Description Stack/Vent Nominal 

Capacity UOM Control 

Device 

Building T6 

BLR001 Natural Gas Boiler No. 1 S-T6-BLR001 50 MMBtu/hr None 

BLR002 Natural Gas Boiler No. 2 S-T6-BLR002 50 MMBtu/hr None 

BLR003 Natural Gas Boiler No. 3 S-T6-BLR003 50 MMBtu/hr None 

BLR004 Natural Gas/Fuel Oil 

Boiler No. 4 S-T6-BLR004 142 MMBtu/hr None 

BLR005 Natural Gas/Fuel Oil 

Boiler No. 5 S-T6-BLR005 97 MMBtu/hr None 

Building T26

BLR006 Natural Gas/Fuel Oil 

Boiler No. 6 

S-T26-

BLR006 156.1 MMBtu/hr None 

BLR007 Natural Gas/Fuel Oil 

Boiler No. 7 

S-T26-

BLR007 156.1 MMBtu/hr None 

T26-GEN7500A Natural Powered 

Emergency Generator 

S-T26- GEN7500A 150 KW None 

T26-COMP 

5600A 

Diesel Powered 

Emergency Air 

Compressor 

S-T26- COMP 

5600A 125 Hp None 

* Emission units marked with a single asterisk are insignificant activities as defined in 326 IAC 2-7-1(21). 

 (b) The following emission units are not subject to applicable requirements described in this D 

section and are listed only for informational purposes: 

 Emission 

Unit ID Emission Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity UOM Control Device 

Outside Building T6: 

OILTK001* Fuel Oil Storage Tank PV-T6-

OILTK001 250,000 gallons None 

* Emission units marked with a single asterisk are insignificant activities as defined in326 IAC 2-7-1(21). Specifically, the fuel oil 

storage tank is an insignificant activity pursuant to 326 IAC 2-7-1(21)(A)-(C). 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.20.0 Natural Gas Fuel Usage 

 

Boilers No.1, No. 2, and No. 3 shall burn only natural gas on and after September 13, 2007. 

D.20.1 General Provisions Relating to NSPS and NESHAP [326 IAC 12-1] [40 CFR 60, Subpart A] [40 

CFR 63, Subpart A] [326 IAC 20-1] 

(a) The provisions of 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart A - General Provisions, which are 

incorporated by reference in 326 IAC 12-1, apply to Boilers No. 6 and No.7 described in 

this section except when otherwise specified in 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Db. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 157 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(b) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.7505, the Permittee shall comply with the provisions of 40 CFR 

Part 63, Subpart A – General Provisions, which are incorporated by reference as 326 IAC 

20-1-1, for Boilers No. 6 and No.7, as specified in Appendix A of 40 CFR Part 63, 

Subpart DDDDD in accordance with the schedule in 40 CFR 63, Subpart DDDDD. 

D.20.2 Opacity Limitations [326 IAC 5] [40 CFR 60.43b] [326 IAC 12] [326 IAC 2-7-24] 

(a) Notwithstanding Condition C.2, pursuant to 326 IAC 12 the opacity from Boilers No. 6 

and No.7 shall not exceed 20% for any 6-minute block period, except for one 6-minute 

period per hour of not more than 27 percent opacity. Pursuant to 326 IAC 12, the opacity 

limit does not apply during periods of startups, shutdowns, or malfunctions. However, the 

general opacity requirements of Condition C.2 apply at all times. This condition expires 

when the revisions made to 40 CFR 60 Subpart Db, as amended on February 27, 2006, 

become effective as Indiana law. This condition is not federally enforceable. 

(b) When starting up or shutting down Boilers No. 6 and No.7, opacity may exceed the 

applicable limit in Condition C.2. However, opacity levels shall not exceed sixty percent 

(60%) for any six (6)-minute averaging period. Opacity in excess of the applicable limit 

established in 326 IAC 5-1-2 shall not continue for more than two (2) six (6)-minute 

averaging periods in any twenty-four (24) hour period. 

(c) Pursuant to 40 CFR 60.43b(h)(5), because Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 will burn only very low 

sulfur oil or natural gas, the boilers are not subject to opacity limitations in 40 CFR 

60.43b(f) and (g). 

D.20.3 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Limitations [326 IAC 7-1.1-2] [40 CFR 60.41b] [40 CFR 60.42b(k)] 

[326 IAC 12] [326 IAC 2-7-24] 

(a) Pursuant to 326 IAC 7-1.1 (SO2 Emission Limitations), 326 IAC 12, and 40 CFR 60, 

Subpart Db (Standards of Performance for Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam 

Generating Units): 

(1) The SO2 emission rate from Boilers No. 6 and No.7 shall not exceed 0.32 pounds 

per million Btu heat input; or 

(2) The fuel oil shall contain no more than 0.3 weight percent sulfur. 

(3) If the Permittee burns either natural gas or very low sulfur oil, the Permittee shall 

be in compliance with Conditions D.20.3(a)(1) and (2). 

(b) Pursuant to 40 CFR 60 Subpart Db, the fuel oil sulfur content or sulfur dioxide emission 

limit applies at all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction. 

(c) Pursuant to 326 IAC 7-1.1-2 (Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations), the SO2 emissions 

from Boilers No. 4 and No. 5 shall not exceed 0.5 lb/MMBtu of heat input when burning 

No. 2 fuel oil. Pursuant to 326 IAC 7-2-1, compliance with this standard is based on a 

calendar month average. This emission limit correlates to a maximum fuel sulfur content 

of 0.49 percent by weight. 

On and after September 13, 2007, section (c) of this Condition D.20.3 shall apply. 

D.20.4 Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Limitations [40 CFR 60.44b] [326 IAC 12] 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 60.44b(a), the NOx emission rate from Boilers No. 6 and No.7 shall not 

exceed 0.2 lb per MMBtu per boiler. The NOx emission limit shall be based on a 30-day rolling 

average. The NOx emission limit applies at all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and 

malfunction. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 158 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

D.20.5 Particulate Matter (PM) Limitations [40 CFR 63.7505] [40 CFR Subpart DDDDD, Table 1] 

 [326 IAC 20-1] [326 IAC 6-2-3] [326 IAC 2-7-24] 

(a) Pursuant to 326 IAC 6-2-3(b) (Particulate Matter Emission Limitations for Sources of 

Indirect Heating), particulate emissions from each natural gas-fired boiler (Boilers No. 1, 

No. 2, and No. 3) shall not exceed 0.56 pounds per million British thermal units (MMBtu) 

heat input. 

(b) Pursuant to 326 IAC 6-2-3(c) (Particulate Matter Emission Limitations for Sources of 

Indirect Heating), particulate emissions from Boiler No. 4 shall not exceed 0.39 pounds 

per MMBtu heat input. 

(c) Pursuant to 326 IAC 6-2-3(c) (Particulate Matter Emission Limitations for Sources of 

Indirect Heating), particulate emissions from Boiler No. 5 shall not exceed 0.31 pounds 

per MMBtu heat input. 

(d) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD, Table 1, and 326 IAC 6-2-4(a), the PM 

emission rate from each of Boilers No. 6 and No.7 shall not exceed 0.03 pounds per 

MMBtu heat input. The particulate matter emission limit applies at all times except during 

periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction. 

On and after September 13, 2007, sections (a) through (c) of this Condition D.20.5 shall apply. 

D.20.6 Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Limitations [40 CFR 63.7505] [40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD, Table 

1][326 IAC 20-1] 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD, Table 1, the HCl emission rate from Boilers No. 6 and 

No.7 shall not exceed 0.0005 pounds per MMBtu heat input. The hydrogen chloride emission limit 

applies at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction. 

D.20.7 Carbon Monoxide (CO) Limitations [40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD, Table 1] [40 CFR 63.7505] 

[40 CFR 63.7525] [40 CFR 63.7540] [326 IAC 20-1] 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 63, Subpart DDDDD, Table 1, CO emission rate from each of Boilers No. 6 

and No.7 shall not exceed 400 ppmdv at 3% Oxygen based on a rolling 30-day average. The CO 

emission limit does not apply during periods of startup, shutdown, malfunction, or when boiler 

loads are below 50% (40 CFR 63.7540(a)(10)(ii). 

D.20.8 PSD Minor Limitations for CO [326 IAC 2-2] 

(a) The total carbon monoxide emissions from Boilers No. 6 and No.7 shall be less than 98 

tons per twelve consecutive month period with the compliance determined at the end of 

each month. 

During the first twelve (12) months after startup of either Boilers No. 6 or No. 7, the total 

carbon monoxide emissions divided by the accumulated months of operation shall not 

exceed 8.17 tons up to a maximum total of 98 tons for the first twelve (12) months of 

operation of the boilers. 

(b) The hours of operation of the emergency air compressor shall be limited to 500 hours per 

year. The Permittee shall monitor the operating hours of the emergency air compressor 

with a non-resettable hour meter, as required by 40 CFR 60.4209(a). 

Compliance with the CO emission limit of Boilers No. 6 and No. 7, and the hours of operation of 

the emergency air compressor will render 326 IAC 2-2 (Prevention of Significant Deterioration) 

not applicable to this modification. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 159 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

D.20.9 NSPS Capacity Limitations [AMP approval 11-22-2005] [326 IAC 12] [40 CFR 60, 

 Subpart Db] 

The amount of very low sulfur oil with a maximum sulfur content of 0.3%, burned in each of 

Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 shall be less than 976,740 gallons per year. 

This will limit the very low sulfur oil annual capacity factors of Boilers No. 6 and No.7 to less than 

10 percent. This fuel oil use limit will qualify fuel oil use as “infrequent use” under 40 CFR 

60.13(i)(20), which is the requirement of an alternative monitoring plan (AMP) for opacity in lieu of 

installing continuous opacity monitoring systems. 

A quarterly summary of the very low sulfur oil use report shall be submitted with the opacity 

excess emission report. Each quarterly report must be submitted within 30-days after the end of 

each quarter (January-March, April-June, July-September, and October-December). 

This condition expires when the revisions made to 40 CFR 60 Subpart Db as amended on 

February 27, 2006, become effective as Indiana law. This condition is not federally enforceable. 

D.20.10 Required Plans and Procedures [40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DDDDD] [326 IAC 20-1] 

(a) Pursuant to 63.7505(d), the Permittee shall develop and submit to the IDEM, OAQ for 

approval a site-specific monitoring plan for Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 that addresses 

paragraphs 40 CFR 7505 (d)(1)(i) through (iii). The Permittee must submit this sitespecific monitoring plan at least 60 days before the initial performance evaluation of 

CMS. 

(b) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63 7505(e), the Permittee must develop and implement a written 

startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan (SSMP) for Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 according to 

the provisions in 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3). 

(c) Continuous Emission Monitor Standard Operating Procedures (CEMS SOP) – The 

Permittee shall prepare and implement a CEMS SOP for each required CEMS. The SOP 

for the CO monitor shall meet the requirements of 40 CFR 63.8(d) and (e). 

D.20.11 Preventive Maintenance Plan [326 IAC 2-7-5(13)] 

A Preventive Maintenance Plan, in accordance with Section B - Preventive Maintenance Plan, of 

this permit, is required for the boilers. 

Testing and Monitoring Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-6(1), (6)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.20.12 Opacity Monitoring Requirements [U. S. EPA Alternative Monitoring Plan approval 11/22/2005] 

[326 IAC 12] 

(a) At least six consecutive minutes of visible emission observations of the stack exhaust for 

Boilers No. 6 and No.7 must be conducted. These must be conducted at least once 

during each daylight shift during which fuel oil is being combusted. Visible emissions 

must be conducted when the maximum rate of fuel oil for that shift is being burned. The 

observer conducting the visible emissions must be certified to read visible emissions in 

accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s Reference Method 

9 (USEPA RM9). 

(b) At least six consecutive minutes of visible emissions must be conducted for each boiler 

whenever the respective boiler reaches the expected operating load after a cold start-up. 

These visible emissions readings must be conducted by an observer certified in 

accordance with USEPA RM9. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 160 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(c) If visible emissions conducted in accordance with either condition (a) or condition (b) 

above identify an average opacity exceeding 10 percent, the observer must collect at 

least two additional sets of consecutive six minute visible emissions readings within that 

hour. 

(d) The Permittee must create records of visible emissions in accordance with 40 CFR 60.7. 

These records must include at least the date and time of visible emission observations 

along with the results of all readings and average calculated. 

(e) If at any time the annual capacity factor for burning very low sulfur oil is 10 percent or 

more, the Permittee will no longer qualify for this alternative opacity monitoring plan. The 

Permittee will then be required to propose a schedule for installing, certifying and 

operating continuous opacity monitoring system for each boiler identified above. 

This condition expires when the revisions made to 40 CFR 60 Subpart Db, as amended on 

February 27, 2006, become effective as Indiana law. This condition is not federally enforceable. 

D.20.13 Compliance Requirements for SO2 [326 IAC 7-2] [40 CFR 60.45b(j)] [40 CFR 60.47b(f)] 

[326 IAC 12] 

 

 Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 are subject to the following requirements: 

(a) The Permittee shall burn only natural gas or very low sulfur fuel oil. 

(b) The Permittee shall demonstrate that the oil burned meets the definition of very low sulfur 

fuel oil by: 

(1) Following the performance testing procedures as described in 40 CFR 60.45b(c) 

or 40 CFR 60.45b(d); or 

(2) Maintaining fuel receipts as described in 40 CFR 60.49b(r). 

Compliance monitoring is not required when burning very low sulfur fuel oil. 

On and after September 13, 2007, this condition shall also apply to Boilers No. 4 and No. 5. 

D.20.14 Initial Performance Test Requirements for NOx [40 CFR 60.46b] [326 IAC 12] [326 IAC 3-6-3] 

[326 IAC 2-7-24] [326 IAC 2-1.1-11] [40 CFR Part 60.8] 

(a) Within 60 days after achieving the maximum production rate, but no later than 180 days 

after initial startup, the NOx emissions from Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 shall be monitored 

for 30 successive steam generating unit operating days and the 30-day average emission 

rate shall be used to determine compliance with the nitrogen oxides emission standards 

under 40 CFR 60.44b. The 30-day average emission rate is calculated as the average of 

all hourly emissions data recorded by the monitoring system during the 30-day test 

period. 

(b) Subsequent performance test shall be performed upon request by IDEM, OAQ [40 CFR 

60.46b (e) (4)]. 

D.20.15 Initial and Continuous Compliance Requirements for PM, HCl and CO [40 CFR 63.7506] 

[40 CFR 63.7510] [40 CFR 63.7530] [40 CFR 63.7540] [326 IAC 20-1] 

(a) The Permittee must demonstrate initial compliance with the emission limits of PM and 

HCl and CO work practice standard no later than 180 days after startup of Boilers No. 6 

and No. 7. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 161 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(b) To demonstrate initial compliance with the emission limits of PM and HCl, the Permittee 

must include a signed statement in the Notification of Compliance Status report required 

in 40 CFR 63.7545(e) that indicates the Permittee burns only liquid fossil fuels other than 

residual oils, either alone or in combination with gaseous fuels in Boilers No. 6 and No. 7. 

(c) To demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission limits of PM and HCl, the 

Permittee must keep records that demonstrate that the Permittee burns only liquid fossil 

fuels other than residual oils, either alone or in combination with gaseous fuels in Boilers 

No. 6 and No. 7. The Permittee must also include a signed statement in each semiannual 

compliance report required in 40 CFR 63.7550 that indicates the 

Permittee burns only liquid fossil fuels other than residual oils, either alone or in 

combination with gaseous fuels, during the reporting period. 

(d) To demonstrate initial compliance with the work practice standard for CO, the Permittee 

shall conduct a performance evaluation of the continuous emission monitoring system for 

carbon monoxide according to 40 CFR 63.7525(a). 

(e) To demonstrate continuous compliance with the work practice standard for CO, the 

Permittee shall meet the requirements of 40 CFR 63.7540(a)(10). 

D.20.16 Continuous Emission Monitoring System (CEMS) Requirements [40 CFR 60.13] [40 CFR 

60.48b] [40 CFR 63.7525] [40 CFR 63.8] [326 IAC 2-1.1-11] [326 IAC 2-7-24] [326 IAC 3-5] 

[40 CFR 60.48b (e) (2)] [326 IAC 12] [326 IAC 20-1] 

(a) NOx CEMS Operation Requirements – The following requirements shall apply to Boilers 

No. 6 and No. 7 when burning natural gas and/or fuel oil: 

(1) The Permittee shall install, calibrate, maintain, evaluate, and operate the NOx 

CEMS in accordance with the procedures in 40 CFR 60.13 and 40 CFR 60, 

Appendix F. The span value for the NOx CEMS shall be 500 ppm. If an 

Alternative Monitoring Plan (AMP) is approved per 40 CFR 60.13(i), then the 

conditions in the AMP shall be followed. 

(2) The CEMS shall be operational upon startup of the boilers. 

(3) Continuous operation is defined as one data point every 15-minute period. 

(4) The NOx emissions shall be calculated using stack flow data, or an appropriate 

F- Factor per 40 CFR 60 Appendix A, Method 19. 

(5) The Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) shall include procedures to obtain 

emission data when nitrogen oxides emission data are not obtained because of 

continuous monitoring system breakdowns, repairs, calibration checks and zero 

and span adjustments. The emission data will be obtained by using standby 

monitoring systems, Method 7, Method 7A, or other approved reference methods 

to provide emission data for a minimum of 75 percent of the operating hours in 

each steam generating unit operating day, in at least 22 out of 30 successive 

steam generating unit operating days. 

(6) The 1-hour average nitrogen oxides emission rates measured by the continuous 

nitrogen oxides monitor shall be expressed in lb/MMBTU heat input and shall be 

used to calculate the average emission rates under 40 CFR 60.44b. The 1-hour 

averages shall be calculated using the data points required under 40 CFR 

60.13(b). At least two data points must be used to calculate each 1-hour 

average. 

(b) CO and O2 CEMS Operation Requirements – The following requirements shall apply to 

Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 when burning natural gas and/or fuel oil: 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 162 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(1) The Permittee shall install, operate, and maintain the CO and O2 CEMS 

according to Performance Specification (PS) 4A of 40 CFR part 60, appendix B 

[40 CFR 63.7525(a)(1)] and according to the site-specific monitoring plan 

developed according to 40 CFR 63.7505(d). If an Alternative Monitoring Plan 

(AMP) is approved per 40 CFR 63.8(f), then the conditions in the AMP shall be 

met and followed. 

(2) The CEMS shall be installed and operational upon startup of the boilers. 

(3) Continuous operation is defined as the collection of at least one measurement for 

each successive 15-minute period, regardless of startup, shutdown and 

malfunction. [40 CFR 63.7535(a)(3)] 

(4) The 30-day rolling average shall be calculated on a daily basis as the average of 

all of the hourly averages in the preceding 30 days [40 CFR 63.7525(a)(5). 

(5) Data recorded during periods of monitoring malfunctions, associated repairs, outof-control periods, required quality assurance or control activities, or when the 

boiler is operating at less than 50 percent of its rated capacity shall not be used 

to determine compliance. Any period for which the monitoring system is out of 

control and data are not available for required calculations constitute a deviation 

from the monitoring requirements. [63.7525(a)(6)] 

(c) CEMS Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) – The Permittee shall prepare and 

implement an SOP that provides step-by-step procedures and operations in accordance 

with 326 IAC 3-5-4(a). This includes preventive maintenance procedures and corrective 

actions that include those procedures taken to ensure continuous operation and to 

minimize malfunctions. The SOP must be submitted to IDEM within 90 days of installation 

of the monitors. 

(d) The commissioner may require stack testing, monitoring, or reporting at any time to 

assure compliance with all applicable requirements. Any monitoring or testing shall be 

performed in accordance with 326 IAC 3 or other methods approved by the commissioner 

or the U.S. EPA. 

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-19] 

D.20.17 Record Keeping Requirements 

The Permittee shall maintain the following records: 

(a) The records of the carbon monoxide emissions, in tons per month, from Boilers No. 6 and 

No. 7 and hours of operation of the emergency compressor; 

(b) The monthly records of the amount of very low sulfur oil burned in each Boilers No. 6 and 

No. 7, and the capacity factor of each of Boilers No. 6 and No. 7; 

This condition expires when the revisions made to 40 CFR 60 Subpart Db as amended 

on February 27, 2006, become effective as Indiana law. This condition is not federally 

enforceable. 

(c) Receipts or test analysis for fuel oil burned in Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 certifying that the 

fuel oil is less than 0.3% sulfur content [40 CFR 60.42b(j), 40 CFR 60.49b(r )]; 

(d) Daily records of all fuel burned in Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 [40 CFR 60.49b(d), 40 CFR 

63.7555(d)(1)]; 

(e) Annual capacity factor for each fuel burned in Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 calculated monthly 

using a 12-month rolling average [40 CFR60.49b(d)]; 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 163 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(f) Records of any visual opacity reading of Boilers No. 6 and No. 7. These records must 

include the date and time of the observations, the results of all readings, and the 

averages calculated; 

This condition expires when the revisions made to 40 CFR 60 Subpart Db as amended 

on February 27, 2006, become effective as Indiana law. This condition is not federally 

enforceable. 

(g) NOx Emissions data for each of Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 operating day: 

(1) Average hourly NOx emissions in lbs/MMBtu [40 CFR 60.49b(g)(2)]; 

(2) Rolling 30-day average NOx emissions in lbs/MMBtu [40 CFR 60.49b(g)(3)]; 

(3) Periods when the 30-day NOx average exceeds the limit in D.20.3 [40 CFR 

60.49b (g) (4) and 40 CFR 60.49b (h) (4)]; 

(4) Days when sufficient data was not obtained [40 CFR 60.49b(g)(5)]; 

(5) Times and reasons for excluding data [40 CFR 60.49b(g)(6)]; 

(6) Any F factors used to calculate NOx emissions, method of determination, and 

type of fuel combusted [40 CFR 60.49b(g)(7)]; 

(7) Times when full span was exceeded [40 CFR 60.49b(g)(8)]; 

(8) Description of any modifications to the CEMS that could affect the ability of the 

system to comply with Performance Standard 2 [40 CFR 60.49b(g)(9)]; and 

(9) Results of CEMS daily drift tests and quarterly accuracy assessments [40 CFR 

60.49b(g)(10)]. 

(h) CO Emissions data for Boilers No. 6 and No. 7: 

(1) Each period during which a CMS or CEMS on Boilers No. 6 and No.7 is 

malfunctioning or inoperative (including out-of-control periods) [40 CFR 63.10(b)]; 

(2) All required measurements needed to demonstrate compliance with the CO 

standard for Boilers No. 6 and No.7 (including, but not limited to, 15-minute 

averages of CEMS data, raw performance testing measurements, and raw 

performance evaluation measurements, that support data that the source is 

required to report) [40 CFR 63.10(b)]; 

(3) All results of CEMS performance evaluations [40 CFR 63.10(b)]; 

(4) All measurements as may be necessary to determine the conditions of 

performance evaluations [40 CFR 63.10(b)]; 

(5) All CMS calibration checks [40 CFR 63.10(b)]; 

(6) All adjustments and maintenance performed on the CEMS [40 CFR 63.10(b)]; 

(7) Previous (i.e., superseded) versions of the CEMS SOP as required in 

40 CFR 63.8(d) (3); 

(8) Records of the date and time that each deviation started and stopped, and 

whether the deviation occurred during a period of startup, shutdown, or 

malfunction or during another period [40 CFR 63.7555 (a) (5)]; 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 164 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(9) Hourly CO average in ppmdv [63.7525(a)(5)]; 

(10) 30-day rolling CO average in ppmdv calculated as average of all hourly averages 

in the 30 day period [63.7525(a)(5)]; and 

(11) The boiler hourly emissions shall be computed using the data points required 

under 40 CFR 63.8(g) and 40 CFR 63.2, appropriate F factors, and/or the 

emission factors in the paragraphs (ii) and (iii): 

(i) 1-hour averages shall be computed from four or more data points equally 

spaced over each 1-hour period, except during periods when calibration, 

quality assurance, or maintenance activities are being performed. During 

these periods, a valid hourly average shall consist of at least two data 

points with each representing a 15-minute period. Alternatively, an 

arithmetic or integrated 1-hour average of CEMS data may be used. At 

least two equally spaced data points must be used to calculate each 1 - 

hour average; [40 CFR 63.8(g)] 

(ii) When burning natural gas: 84 lbs of CO/million cubic feet of gas burned 

or 12.9 lbs/hr; and 

(iii) When burning fuel oil: 5 lbs of CO/thousand gallons of oil or 5.58 lbs/hr. 

(i) Records of the operation of T26-GEN-7500A Diesel Powered Emergency Generator in 

emergency and non-emergency service. This shall include the time of operation and the 

reason the engine was in operation at that time [40CFR 60.4214(b)]. 

(j) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.10(b), the Permittee shall maintain files of all information 

(including all reports and notifications) required by the general provisions and subpart 

DDDDD of 40 CFR 63. This subsection is applicable only to Boilers No. 6 and No. 7. 

(1) The Permittee shall retain each record for at least 5 years following the date of 

each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or 

record. The most recent 2 years of records shall be retained at the facility. The 

remaining 3 years of records may be retained off site; 

(2) The Permittee may retain records on microfilm, computer disks, magnetic tape, 

or microfiche; and 

(3) The Permittee shall report required information on paper or on a labeled 

computer disk. 

(k) On and after September 13, 2007, the Permittee shall record the information described in 

item (1) through (4) below on a calendar month basis for Boiler No. 4, and Boiler No. 5: 

(1) The amount (expressed in thousands of gallons (Mgal)) of No. 2 fuel oil burned in 

Boilers No. 4 and No. 5; 

(2) The average sulfur content (expressed in percentage by weight) of the No. 2 fuel 

oil burned in Boilers No. 4 and No. 5; 

(3) The average higher heating value (expressed in Btu per gallon) of the No. 2 fuel 

oil burned in Boilers No. 4 and No. 5; and 

(4) The average sulfur dioxide emission rate (expressed in pounds per MMBtu) of 

the No. 2 fuel oil for Boilers No. 4 and No. 5. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 165 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

D.20.18 Reporting Requirements 

(a) A certification shall be submitted to the IDEM, OAQ, stating that only Very Low Sulfur Oil 

was burned in Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 [40 CFR 60.49b(r)] and a statement that only liquid 

fossil fuels other than residual oil were burned in Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 [40 CFR 

63.7506(a)(2)]. The certification does require the certification by the “responsible official” 

as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

(b) A quarterly summary of the information to document compliance with Conditions D.20.8 

(a) and (b) shall be submitted to the IDEM, OAQ, using the reporting forms located at the 

end of this permit, or their equivalent, within thirty (30) days after the end of the quarter 

being reported. The report submitted by the Permittee does require the certification by 

the “responsible official” as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

(c) A quarterly summary of the information to document compliance with Condition D.20.9 

and 40 CFR 63.7550(c)(4) shall be submitted to the IDEM, OAQ, using the reporting 

forms located at the end of this permit, or their equivalent, within thirty (30) days after the 

end of the quarter being reported. The report submitted by the Permittee does require the 

certification by the “responsible official” as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

(d) The following information shall be reported quarterly: 

(1) For Boilers No. 6 and No. 7, all NOx emission records described in D.20.17(g) 

[40 CFR 60.49b(i)]; 

(2) A statement that only very low sulfur fuel was burned in Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 

[40 CFR 60.49b(r)]; 

(3) The total fuel used by Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 for each calendar month 

[40 CFR 63.7550(c) (4)]; 

(4) A statement that no new fuels were burned in Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 

[40 CFR 63.7550(c) (6)]; 

(5) SSM report as described in 40 CFR 63.10(d)(5)(i) [40 CFR 63.7550(c)(9)]; 

(6) Description of any deviations occurring in Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 containing the 

information required by 40 CFR 60.7550 (d) and (e), or a statement that there 

were none [40 CFR 63.7550(c)(10)]; 

(7) Description of any CEMS downtime events, or a statement that there were none 

[40 CFR 63.7550(c)(11)]; 

(8) An excess emissions report for Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 that identifies any opacity 

excess emissions, the time and date of the visible emission readings and the 

total time of the visible emission observations for each date, and the total number 

of hours that oil was burned during each quarter. Excess emissions are any 6-

minute period when the average visible emissions exceeded 20%. If oil was not 

used, then the report shall indicate that fuel oil was not combusted. [40 CFR 

60.49b(h)] This condition expires when the revisions made to 40 CFR 60 Subpart 

Db, as amended on February 27, 2006, become effective as Indiana Law. This 

condition is not federally enforceable; and 

(9) The excess emission report for Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 must provide the 

calculations showing the annual capacity factor for burning fuel oil at each boiler. 

[Opacity AMP] This condition expires when the revisions made to 40 CFR 60 

Subpart Db, as amended on February 27, 2006, become effective as Indiana 

Law. This condition is not federally enforceable. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 166 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(e) Immediate Reporting Requirements 

The reporting requirements in the NESHAP General Provisions for Startup, Shutdown 

and Malfunction (SSM) Plans [40 CFR 63.6(e)(3)] shall be used to satisfy the reporting 

requirements under the NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and 

Process Heaters [40 CRF 63.7505(e)]. 

(1) Any time an action taken by the Permittee during an SSM event of a process is 

not consistent with the procedures specified in the SSM Plan, the Permittee shall 

report the actions taken for that event. The immediate report shall be submitted 

to the IDEM, OAQ via a telephone call or facsimile within 2 working days after 

commencing actions inconsistent with the plan. 

(2) Within 7 working days after the end of an SSM event of a process where an 

action taken by the Permittee is not consistent with the procedures specified in 

the SSM Plan, the Permittee shall submit a letter containing the following 

information in accordance with 40 CFR 63.10(d)(5): 

(A) Name, title and signature of responsible official certifying accuracy; 

(B) Explanation of the circumstances of the event; 

(C) Reason for not following the SSM Plan; and 

(D) Report any excess emissions and/or parameter monitoring exceedances 

are believed to have occurred. 

(f) On and after September 13, 2007, the Permittee shall submit quarterly summary reports 

of the monthly fuel oil characteristic and consumption records required by Condition 

D.20.17 for Boilers No. 4 and No. 5. 

D.20.19 Applicability of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart ZZZZ-National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants for Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines (RICE MACT). 

The emergency generator or the air compressor has a site-rating of less than 500 brake 

horsepower. Therefore, the emergency generator and the air compressor are not subject to the 

requirements of 40 CFR 63, Subpart ZZZZ (National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants for Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines). 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 167 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION E.1 LEAK DETECTION AND REPAIR (LDAR) CONDITIONS FOR BPM PROCESS 

SYSTEM COMPONENTS 

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The following facility description of LDAR components subject to this permit section is descriptive 

information and does not constitute enforceable conditions: 

(a) BPM process systems consist of process operations and non-waste storage serving bulk 

pharmaceutical manufacturing operations. LDAR applies to BPM process system components 

such as pumps, compressors, agitators, pressure relief devices, sampling connection systems, 

open-ended valves and lines, valves, connectors, instrumentation systems, control devices, and 

closed-vent systems intended to operate in volatile organic hazardous air pollutant and/or volatile 

organic compound (VOHAP/VOC) service for 300 hours or more during the calendar year. In 

VOHAP/VOC service means that a piece or equipment either contains or contacts a fluid (liquid 

or gas) that is at least 5 percent by weight VOHAP/VOC. 

(b) LDAR BPM process system components are located from the point at which raw material serving 

the BPM operations is unloaded at the plant site to the point of determination (POD) or point 

where waste exits the pharmaceutical manufacturing process unit (PMPU). The closed-vent 

systems not used to control emissions from LDAR components are not subject to the conditions 

of this section, but instead are subject to the conditions in Sections D.14, and D.15, as applicable. 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

E.1.1 LDAR Standards for BPM Process System Components [40 CFR 63.1255, 40 CFR 61 Subpart I, 

326 IAC 8-5-3(b)(6), 326 IAC 2-2, CP157-4148 (Revised by this permit)] 

Except as provided in Condition E.1.2, the following LDAR standards satisfy the requirements of 

the Pharmaceutical Production MACT (Pharma MACT) standards [40 CFR 63.1255], Best 

Available Control Technology (BACT) requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3], Reasonably Available 

Control Technology (RACT) LDAR requirements for synthesized pharmaceutical manufacturing 

operations [326 IAC 8-5-3(b)(6)], and construction permit [CP157-4148] requirements for LDAR 

components associated with the research and development operations in Building T71: 

(a) The Permittee shall implement the LDAR program under 40 CFR 63.1255 for all BPM 

process system component types listed in item (a) of the facility description section from 

the point at which raw material serving BPM is unloaded at the plant site to the point of 

determination (POD) or point where waste exits the pharmaceutical manufacturing 

process unit (PMPU). 

(b) The Permittee shall conduct an initial monitoring survey that includes the total number of 

each existing BPM process component type and initial monitoring as follows: 

(1) Existing BPM process system components in VOHAP service shall be initially 

monitored between October 21, 2002 and October 21, 2003. 

(2) Existing BPM process system components in VOC service shall be initially 

monitored for purposes of this permit between October 21, 2002 and October 21, 

2003. 

(3) Subsequent monitoring periods shall be calendar periods, beginning October 22, 

2003. 

(c) Each new or changed BPM process system component in VOC/VOHAP service identified 

during the course of each monitoring period shall be incorporated into the existing 

component list as necessary within 90 days, or by the next LDAR Periodic Report, 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 168 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

following the end of the monitoring period for the type of component monitored, 

whichever is later. 

(d) The following BPM process system components in VOHAP/VOC service shall comply 

with design standards, shall be operated in accordance with work practice standards or 

shall undergo periodic LDAR monitoring in accordance with the provisions cited below. 

Periodic LDAR monitoring shall be performed in accordance with 40 CFR 60, Appendix 

A, Method 21 and 40 CFR 63.1255(b)(4)(v). The regulatory language cited by reference 

in this section appears in full in Appendix A. 

(1) Pumps in light liquid service shall be operated in accordance with the standard at 

63.1255(c). This section provides, generally and in part: 

(A) Single seal pumps shall undergo periodic monitoring and visual 

inspections; 

(B) Dual mechanical seal pumps shall meet design, operation, inspection, 

and alarm requirements; 

(C) Pumps designed without a shaft penetrating the pump housing are not 

required to be inspected or monitored; and 

(D) Pumps equipped with a closed-vent system limitable of capturing and 

transporting any leakage from the seals back to the process or to a 

control device are not required to be inspected or monitored. 

(2) Compressors shall be operated in accordance with the standards at 

63.1255(b)(3), which requires compliance with 63.164. This section provides, 

generally and in part: 

(A) Compressors with barrier fluid seal systems shall meet design, 

operation, inspection, and alarm requirements. 

(B) Compressors equipped with a closed-vent system to capture and 

transport leakage from the compressor drive shaft seal back to a process 

or a fuel gas system or to a control device are not required to be 

inspected or monitored. 

(C) Compressors designated to operate with an instrument reading of less 

than 500 ppmv above background shall be monitored initially and 

annually. 

(3) Pressure relief devices in gas/vapor service shall be operated in accordance with 

the standard at 63.1255(b)(3), which requires compliance with 63.165. This 

section provides, generally and in part: 

(A) Except during pressure releases, pressure relief devices shall be 

operated with an instrument reading of less than 500 ppmv above 

background. 

(B) After each pressure release, the device shall be returned to a monitored 

condition of less than 500 ppmv above background within 5 calendar 

days after the release, except if delay of repair applies. 

(C) A rupture disk satisfies conditions E.1.1 (d)(3)(A) and (B) without 

monitoring if it is replaced within 5 calendar days after each pressure 

release, except if delay of repair applies. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 169 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(D) Any pressure relief device satisfies conditions E.1.1 (d)(3)(i) and (ii) 

without monitoring if it is routed to a process or fuel gas system or 

equipped with a closed-vent system limitable of capturing and 

transporting leakage from the pressure relief device to a control device. 

(4) Sampling connection systems shall be operated in accordance with the standard 

at 63.1255(b)(3), which requires compliance with 63.166. This section provides, 

generally and in part: 

(A) Gases displaced during filling of a sample container are not required to 

be captured or collected. 

(B) Each sampling connection system shall be equipped with a closedpurge, closed-loop or closed-vent system, which shall: 

(i) Return the purged process fluid directly to the process line; 

(ii) Collect and recycle the purged process fluid to a process; 

(iii) Be designed and operated to capture and transport the purged 

process fluid to a control device; 

(iv) Collect, store, and transport the purged process fluid to a 

SOCMI/HON waste management unit (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart 

G) operated according to the provisions which apply to Group 1 

wastewater streams, or to a treatment, storage, or disposal 

facility subject to regulation under 40 CFR Part 262, 264, 265 or 

266 (a RCRA unit), or, if the purged fluids are not hazardous 

waste, to a facility with an appropriate State permit to manage 

municipal or industrial solid waste; or 

(v) In-situ sampling systems, and sampling systems without purges, 

have no other obligations under this section. 

(5) Open-ended valves or lines shall be operated in accordance with the standard at 

63.1255(d). This section provides, generally and in part: 

(A) Each open-ended valve and line shall be equipped with a cap, blind 

flange, plug or second valve, which shall seal the open end at all times 

except when operations require fluid flow through the open-ended valve 

or line, or during maintenance or repair. 

(B) The cap, blind flange, plug or second valve shall be in place and closed 

within one hour of cessation of operations requiring fluid flow through the 

open-ended valve or line, or maintenance or repair. No records are 

required to document compliance with this provision. 

(C) If a second valve is used, the valve on the process fluid end shall be 

closed before the other valve is closed. 

(D) If a double block and bleed arrangement is used, the bleed valve may 

remain open during operations requiring venting the line between the 

block valves, but shall be closed otherwise in accordance with E.1.1 

(d)(5)(B). 

(E) Open-ended valves and lines in an emergency shutdown system which 

are designed to open automatically in the event of a process upset are 

not required to comply with E.1.1 (d)(5)(A) through (C). 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 170 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(F) Open-ended valves or lines containing materials, which would 

autocatalytically polymerize are not required to comply with E.1.1 

(d)(5)(A) through (C). 

(G) Open-ended valves or lines containing materials which could cause a 

serious safety hazard if capped or equipped with a double block and 

bleed system are not required to comply with E.1.1 (d)(5)(A) through (C). 

(6) Valves in gas/vapor and light liquid service shall be operated in accordance with 

the standard at 63.1255(e). This section provides, generally and in part: 

(A) Valves shall undergo periodic monitoring. 

(B) Each monitoring period shall be determined by a calculation based on 

the percentage of leaking valves measured in prior monitoring periods. 

(C) Valves may be placed into subgroups for periodic monitoring purposes, 

and may be reassigned among subgroups. 

(D) After a leaking valve is repaired, it shall be monitored again within 3 

months after repair. This monitoring may be considered part of the 

periodic monitoring, or may, if conducted prior to the periodic monitoring, 

be considered separately from the periodic monitoring data in 

determining percent leaking valves for the monitoring period. 

(7) Closed-vent systems and control devices used to comply with LDAR shall be 

operated in accordance with the standard at 63.1255(b)(4)(ii). Operation of these 

systems, in conformance with Sections D.9, D.14, or D.15, shall constitute 

compliance with these requirements; 

(8) Agitators in gas/vapor and light liquid service shall be operated in accordance 

with the standard at 63.1255(c); This section provides, generally and in part: 

(A) Single seal agitators shall undergo periodic monitoring and visual 

inspections. 

(B) Dual mechanical seal agitators shall meet design, operation, inspection, 

and alarm requirements. 

(C) Agitators designed without a shaft penetrating the pump housing are not 

required to be inspected or monitored. 

(D) Agitators equipped with a closed-vent system limitable of capturing and 

transporting any leakage from the seals back to the process or to a 

control device are not required to be inspected or monitored. 

(9) Pumps, valves, connectors, and agitators in heavy liquid service, instrumentation 

systems, and pressure relief devices in liquid service shall be operated in 

accordance with the standard at 63.1255(b)(3), which requires compliance with 

63.169. This section provides, generally and in part: 

(A) If a component presents visual, audible, or olfactory evidence of a leak, 

the leak shall be deemed repaired without monitoring if the component 

meets any of the following: 

(i) The visual, audible, or olfactory evidence has been eliminated; 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 171 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(ii) No bubbles are observed at potential leak sites during a leak 

check using soap solutions; or 

(iii) The system will hold a test pressure. 

(B) If there is visual, audible, or olfactory evidence of a leak at one of these 

components, and the leak is not repaired without monitoring, the 

component shall be monitored within 5 calendar days to confirm whether 

a leak is in fact present. 

(10) Connectors in gas/vapor and light liquid service shall be operated in accordance 

with the standard at 63.1255(b)(4)(iii). This section provides, generally and in 

part: 

(A) Connectors shall undergo periodic monitoring. 

(B) Each monitoring period shall be determined by a calculation based on 

the percentage of leaking connectors measured in prior monitoring 

periods. 

(C) Nonrepairable connectors may not be counted in monitoring period 

calculations. CAN shall be set to zero in the percent leaking connector 

calculation. 

(D) Inaccessible, ceramic, or ceramic-lined connectors are not required to be 

monitored, and are exempt from record keeping and reporting. If they are 

observed to be leaking, they shall be repaired as soon as practicable, but 

no later than 15 calendar days after the leak is detected, except if delay 

of repair applies. There is no obligation to make a first attempt at repair 

within 5 days. 

(E) Connectors that are not required to be monitored are not included in the 

calculation of the percentage of leaking connectors. 

(F) An optional credit may be taken for removed connectors where the weld 

meets certain testing requirements. 

(e) As an alternative to complying with E.1.1(d), except E.1.1(d)(7), BPM process system 

components may comply with 63.1255(b)(4)(iv), which incorporates by reference 

63.178(b) (Alternative Means of Emission Limitation: Batch Processes) as follows: 

(1) Components shall be pressure tested each time the equipment is reconfigured 

for production of a different product or intermediate or at least once per calendar

year, whichever is more stringent. The pressure testing shall be conducted in 

accordance with 63.180(f) or (g); and 

(2) Components must comply with the leak repair requirements before startup of a 

process as described in 63.178(b)(4). 

(f) As an alternative to complying with E.1.1 (d), except E.1.1 (d)(7), BPM process system 

components may comply with.179 (Alternative means of emission limitation: Enclosedvented process units), which requires that process units be enclosed in such a manner 

that all emissions from equipment leaks are vented through a closed-vent system to a 

control device. The enclosure is to be maintained under a negative pressure at all times 

while the process unit is in operation to ensure that all emissions are routed to the control 

device. The closed vent system and control device must comply with E.1.1 (d)(7). 

(g) Any visible leak of a liquid containing VOHAP/VOC shall be considered a leak for 

purposes of the obligation to repair. If it is not clear whether the liquid contains 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 172 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

VOHAP/VOC, then Method 21 may be used to confirm whether a leak exists. For each 

component type, the relevant leak definition and leak repair requirements in E.1.1 (d) 

shall apply for this purpose. All leaks shall be marked as provided in 63.1255(a)(10). 

(h) The Permittee shall initiate repair of any leak no later than 5 calendar days after 

identification, and complete the repair within 15 days after identification, except where 

delay of repair is allowed under 1255(b)(4)(i), which incorporates by reference 63.171. 

This shall not affect repair periods under Conditions E.1.1 (d)(3) or (e). 63.1255(b)(4)(i) 

provides, generally and in part: 

(1) Delay of repair of equipment for which leaks have been detected will be allowed 

if repair within 15 days is technically infeasible without a process unit shutdown. 

Repair of this equipment shall occur before the end of the next scheduled 

process unit shutdown. 

(2) Delay of repair for equipment for which leaks have been detected is allowed if the 

owner or operator determines that repair personnel would be exposed to an 

immediate danger if attempting to repair without a process shutdown. Such repair 

shall occur by the end of the next scheduled process shutdown. 

(3) Delay of repair of equipment for which leaks have been detected will be allowed 

for equipment that is isolated from the process and that does not remain in 

VOC/VOHAP service. 

(4) Delay of repair for valves, connectors, and agitators will be allowed if emissions 

immediate repair would result in greater emissions than delay of repair, and if 

purged material generated during the repair is collected and destroyed or 

recovered in a control device. 

(5) Delay of repair for pumps will be allowed if the repair requires the use of a dual 

mechanical seal system, or a pump designed without an externally actuated shaft 

penetrating the pump housing, or ducting of the pump fugitive emissions to a 

closed vent system and control device, and is completed within 6 months. 

(6) Delay of repair beyond a process unit shutdown will be allowed for a valve if 

valve assembly replacement is necessary during the process unit shutdown, but 

the supplies, although adequately stocked, have been depleted. Delay of repair 

beyond the second process unit shutdown is not allowed unless the second 

shutdown occurs sooner than 6 months after the first shutdown. 

(i) Alternative means of emission limitations not already included in 63.1255 may be 

approved in accordance with 63.1255(b)(3), which incorporates by reference 63.177. 

E.1.2 Exceptions to LDAR Standards for BPM Process System Components 

(a) The following facilities are not subject to the LDAR standards under this section of the 

permit: 

(1) Research and development facilities, activities and equipment (40 CFR 

63.1250(d)) not subject to BACT or construction permit requirements; 

(2) Condition E.1.2(a)(2) was deleted pursuant to Administrative Permit Amendment 

157-20003-00006.; 

(3) Utilities and non-process lines (40 CFR 63.1255(a)(5)); 

(4) Bench scale processes (40 CFR 63.1255(a)(6)); 

(5) Equipment in vacuum service (40 CFR 63.1255(a)(8)); 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 173 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(6) Waste components (covered by Section E.2 of this permit). 

(7) Fermented Products operations; 

(8) Equipment in VOHAP/VOC service but that is in such service less than 300 

hours per calendar year (40 CFR 63.1255(a)(9)); 

(9) Closed loop heat exchange systems (40 CFR 63.1255(a)(5)); and 

(10) Welded fittings (40 CFR 63.1251). 

(b) Equipment that is designated as unsafe to monitor, unsafe to inspect, difficult to monitor, 

difficult to inspect, or inaccessible shall comply with 63.1255(f). This section provides, 

generally, that accessible equipment shall be monitored according to a written plan that 

provides for monitoring as often as practicable, considering safety concerns, but not more 

often than otherwise applicable. Inaccessible equipment is not required to be routinely 

monitored at any time, although any observed leaks must be repaired within 15 days. 

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-19] 

E.1.3 Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)]

(a) Records shall be kept in accordance with 63.1255(g), including but not limited to: 

(1) Identification of components that are subject to the rule with information 

indicating their method of compliance, with justifications as appropriate, except 

that inaccessible, ceramic, or ceramic-lined connectors subject to 40 CFR 

63.1255(f)(4) need not be identified; 

(2) Schedule for monitoring connectors and valves and the percent connectors and 

valves found leaking; 

(3) Design criteria and any changes to these criteria for each dual mechanical seal 

system; 

(4) List of equipment designated as unsafe to monitor/inspect or difficult to 

monitor/inspect and a copy of the plan for monitoring or inspecting such 

equipment; 

(5) Equipment complying via the provisions of 40 CFR 63.178(c); 

(6) List of equipment added since the last monitoring period, and 

(7) If monitoring frequencies are adjusted for time in use, records demonstrating the 

proportion of the time the equipment is in VOC/VOHAP use during the calendar 

year; 

(8) Records of visual inspections; 

(9) Records of leaks detected, repair information, and delays of repair; 

(10) Records of pressure tests, the test pressure, and the pressure drop observed 

during the test; 

(11) Records of compressor and relief device compliance tests; 

(12) Records for closed-vent systems and control devices subject to E.1.1(d)(7); 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 174 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(13) For components in heavy liquid service, records demonstrating that they are in 

heavy liquid service; 

(14) Identification of components exempt because they are in VOHAP/VOC service 

for less than 300 hours per year; and 

(15) Records of alternative means of compliance determination. 

(b) Condition E.1.3(b) was deleted pursuant to Administrative Permit Amendment 157-

20003-00006. 

(c) Reporting requirements shall be conducted in accordance with 63.1255(h), including: 

(1) LDAR Periodic Reports shall cover the monitoring periods from January 1 to 

June 30, and July 1 to December 31, respectively. Reports shall be submitted 30 

days following the 6-month monitoring period. The report shall include any 

revisions to the information reported earlier if the method of compliance has 

changed since the last report. The report shall also contain the following 

information: 

(A) For equipment not complying via the alternative standard, the Permittee 

shall report the following information for pumps, valves, agitators, and 

connectors subject to periodic LDAR monitoring: 

(i) Number of leaks detected and percent leakers; 

(ii) Number of leaks not repaired within the required timeframe; 

(iii) An explanation of any delay of repairs; 

(iv) Notice of a change to monthly monitoring for either pumps or 

valves, if applicable; and 

(v) Notification of a change in connector monitoring alternatives, if 

applicable. 

(B) Results of all monitoring required for applicable compressors, pressure 

relief devices in gas/vapor service, and closed-vent systems; 

(i) Number of leaks not repaired within the required timeframe; and 

(ii) An explanation of any delay of repairs. 

(C) For equipment complying via the alternative standard at 1255(b)(4)(iv), 

the Permittee shall report the following information for each product 

process equipment train: 

(i) Number of pressure tests conducted; 

(ii) Number of instances where the equipment failed either a retest 

or 2 consecutive pressure tests; 

(iii) Facts that explain any delay of repairs; and 

(iv) Results of all monitoring to determine compliance for closed-vent 

systems used to comply with this section of the permit. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 175 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Modifications and Construction Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-10.5, 326 IAC 2-7-12, 326 IAC 2-2] 

E.1.4 Modifications and Construction: Advance Approval of Permit Conditions 

(a) The Permittee may modify any existing components listed in this section of the permit 

without obtaining a source modification approval (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-

10.5), a Title V permit modification (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-2), 

provided the modified emission units are subject to the same applicable requirements 

listed in this D section, and the Permittee shall comply with the Change Management and 

Flexible Permit provisions in Section F.1 of this permit. 

(b) The Permittee may construct and install new emission units of the types described in this 

D section without obtaining a source modification approval (otherwise required by 326 

IAC 2-7-10.5), a Title V permit modification (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-2), 

provided the new emission units are subject to the same applicable requirements listed in 

this D section, and the Permittee shall comply with the Change Management and Flexible 

Permit provisions in Section F.1 of this permit. 

The remainder of the page is left blank intentionally. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 176 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION E.2 LEAK DETECTION AND REPAIR (LDAR) CONDITIONS FOR BPM WASTE SYSTEM 

COMPONENTS 

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The following facility description of LDAR components subject to this permit section is descriptive 

information and does not constitute enforceable conditions: 

(a) LDAR applies to BPM waste system components consisting of pumps, compressors, pressure 

relief devices, sampling connection systems, open-ended valves and lines, valves, connectors, 

control devices, and closed-vent systems used to comply with this LDAR program, intended to 

operate in volatile organic hazardous air pollutant and/or volatile organic compound 

(VOHAP/VOC) service for 300 hours or more during the calendar year. In VOHAP/VOC service 

means that a piece or equipment either contains or contacts a fluid (liquid or gas) that is at least 

10 percent by weight of total VOHAP/VOC. 

(b) LDAR BPM waste system components are located from the point of generation (POG) or point of 

determination (POD), as applicable, to the last component prior to entering the hazardous waste 

combustor or being loaded onto tankers for transport offsite. The closed-vent systems not used 

to control emissions from LDAR components are not subject to the conditions of this section, but 

instead are subject to the conditions in Sections D.10, D.14, and D.15. 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

E.2.1 LDAR Standards for BPM Waste System Components [40 CFR 63.691, 326 IAC 8-5-3(b)(6), 326 

IAC 2-2, CP157-4148 (Revised by this permit)] 

Except as provided in Condition E.2, the following LDAR standards satisfy the requirements of 

the Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessel Standards [40 CFR 60.110b], Offsite Waste and 

Recovery Operations (OSWRO) MACT Standards [40 CFR 63.691], Best Available Control 

Technology (BACT) requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3], Reasonably Available Control Technology 

(RACT) LDAR requirements for synthesized pharmaceutical manufacturing operations [326 IAC 

8-5-3(b)(6)], and construction permit [CP157-4148] requirements for LDAR components 

associated with the research and development operations in Building T71: 

(a) The Permittee shall implement the LDAR program under 40 CFR 61 Subpart V for all 

BPM waste system component types listed in item (a) of the facility description section 

from the point of determination (POD) or at the exit of the pharmaceutical manufacturing 

process unit (PMPU) to the last piece of regulated equipment prior to entering the 

hazardous waste combustor or loaded onto tankers for transport offsite. 

(b) Existing BPM waste system components in VOC/VOHAP service are covered under 40 

CFR 264 and 265, Subpart BB. Data taken for purposes of Subpart BB shall satisfy the 

data requirements for entry into the alternate standard at 40 61.243-3. Monitoring 

periods are calendar periods as defined at 40 CFR 61 Subpart V and 40 CFR 264 and 

265, Subpart BB. 

(c) Each new or changed BPM waste system component in VOC/VOHAP service identified 

during the course of each monitoring period shall be incorporated into the existing 

component list as necessary within 90 days, or by the next LDAR Periodic Report, 

following the end of the monitoring period for the type of component monitored, 

whichever is later. 

(d) The following BPM waste system components in VOHAP/VOC service shall comply with 

design standards, shall be operated in accordance with work practice standards, or shall 

undergo periodic LDAR monitoring in accordance with the provisions cited below. 

Periodic LDAR monitoring shall be performed in accordance with 40 CFR 60, Appendix 

A, Method 21. The regulatory language cited by reference in this section appears in full 

in Appendix A. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 177 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(1) Pumps shall be operated in accordance with the standard at 61.242-2. This 

section provides, generally and in part: 

(A) Single seal pumps shall undergo periodic monitoring and visual 

inspections. 

(B) Dual mechanical seal pumps shall meet design, operation, inspection, 

and alarm requirements. 

(C) Pumps designed without a shaft penetrating the pump housing shall be 

monitored initially and annually, but are not subject to other inspections. 

(D) Pumps equipped with a closed-vent system limitable of capturing and 

transporting any leakage from the seals back to the process or to a 

control device are not required to be inspected or monitored. 

(E) Pumps designated as unsafe-to-monitor shall be monitored according to 

a written plan by which they are monitored as frequently as possible 

during safe-to-monitor times, but not more frequently than otherwise 

applicable. 

(2) Compressors shall be operated in accordance with the standard at 61.242-3. 

This section provides, generally and in part: 

(A) Compressors with barrier fluid seal systems shall meet design, 

operation, inspection, and alarm requirements. 

(B) Compressors equipped with a closed-vent system to capture and 

transport leakage from the compressor drive shaft seal back to a process 

or a fuel gas system or to a control device are not required to be 

inspected or monitored. 

(C) Compressors designated to operate with an instrument reading of less 

than 500 ppmv above background shall be monitored initially and 

annually. 

(3) Pressure relief devices in gas/vapor service shall be operated in accordance with 

the standard at 61.242-4. This section provides, generally and in part: 

(A) Except during pressure releases, pressure relief devices shall be 

operated with an instrument reading of less than 500 ppmv above 

background. 

(B) After each pressure release, the device shall be returned to a monitored 

condition of less than 500 ppmv above background within 5 calendar 

days after the release, except if delay of repair applies. 

(C) A rupture disk is satisfies conditions E.2.1 (d)(3)(A) and (B) without 

monitoring if it is replaced within 5 calendar days after each pressure 

release, except if delay of repair applies. 

(D) Any pressure relief device satisfies conditions E.2.1 (d)(3)(A) and (B) 

without monitoring if it is routed to a process or fuel gas system or 

equipped with a closed-vent system limitable of capturing and 

transporting leakage from the pressure relief device to a control device. 

(4) Sampling Connection Systems shall be operated in accordance with the standard 

at 61.242-5. This section provides, generally and in part: 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 178 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(A) Gases displaced during filling of a sample container are not required to 

be captured or collected. 

(B) Each sampling connection system shall be equipped with a closedpurge, closed-loop or closed-vent system, which shall: 

(i) Return the purged process fluid directly to the process line; 

(ii) Collect and recycle the purged process fluid; 

(iii) Be designed and operated to capture and transport the purged 

process fluid to a control device; 

(iv) Collect, store, and transport the purged process fluid to a 

SOCMI/HON waste management unit (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart 

G) operated according to the provisions which apply to Group 1 

wastewater streams, or to a treatment, storage, or disposal 

facility subject to regulation under 40 CFR Part 262, 264, 265 or 

266 (a RCRA unit), or, if the purged fluids are not hazardous 

waste, to a facility with an appropriate State permit to manage 

municipal or industrial solid waste; or 

(v) In-situ sampling systems, and sampling systems without purges, 

have no other obligations under this section. 

(5) Open-ended valves or lines shall be operated in accordance with the standard at 

61.242-6. This section provides, generally and in part: 

(A) Each open-ended valve and line shall be equipped with a limit, blind 

flange, plug or second valve, which shall seal the open end at all times 

except when operations require fluid flow through the open-ended valve 

or line, or during maintenance or repair. 

(B) If a second valve is used, the valve on the process fluid end shall be 

closed before the other valve is closed. 

(C) If a double block and bleed arrangement is used, the bleed valve may 

remain open during operations requiring venting the line between the 

block valves, but shall be closed otherwise in accordance with E.2.1 

(d)(5)(B). 

(D) Open-ended valves and lines in an emergency shutdown system which 

are designed to open automatically in the event of a process upset are 

not required to comply with E.2.1 (d)(5)(A) through (C). 

(E) Open-ended valves or lines containing materials, which would 

autocatalytically polymerize are not required to comply with E.2.1 

(d)(5)(A) through (C). 

(F) Open-ended valves or lines containing materials which could cause a 

serious safety hazard if capped or equipped with a double block and 

bleed system are not required to comply with E.2.1 (d)(5)(A) through (C). 

(6) Valves shall be operated in accordance with the standard at 61.242-7. This 

section provides, generally and in part: 

(A) Each valve shall be monitored monthly, except as provided below. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 179 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(B) Any valve may be monitored quarterly, in the first month of the quarter, if 

it has completed two successive months without a leak, as long as it 

does not leak. 

(C) Each leaking valve shall be monitored monthly after it is repaired until it 

has completed two successive months without a leak. 

(D) Valves designed for no detectable emissions, which have no external 

actuating mechanism in contact with process fluid, are required only to 

be monitored initially and annually. 

(E) Valves designated as unsafe-to-monitor are required to be monitored 

only according to a written plan, which provides for their monitoring 

during safe-to-monitor times. 

(F) Valves designated as difficult-to-monitor are required to be monitored 

only according to a written plan that provides for their monitoring at least 

once per year. 

(7) Pressure relief devices in liquid service and connectors shall be operated in 

accordance with the standard at 61.242-8 This section provides, generally and in 

part: 

(A) If a component presents visual, audible, or olfactory evidence of a leak, 

the leak shall be deemed repaired without monitoring if the visual, 

audible, or olfactory evidence has been eliminated. 

(B) If there is visual, audible, or olfactory evidence of a leak at one of these 

components, and the leak is not repaired without monitoring, the 

component shall be monitored within 5 calendar days to confirm whether 

a leak is in fact present. 

(8) Closed-vent systems and control devices used to comply with Section E.2 of this 

permit shall be operated in accordance with the standard at 61.242-11, as may 

be applicable. Operation of these systems in conformance with Sections D.9, 

D.14 or D.15 shall constitute compliance with these requirements. 

(9) As an alternative to complying with E.2.1 (d)(6), above, valves may comply with 

the alternative standards for valves-allowable percentage of valves leaking under 

61.243-1. This section provides, generally and in part: 

(A) Upon 90 days’ advance notice to the Administrator, the designated 

process unit shall have no more than 2.0 percent leaking valves. 

(B) All valves in the designated process unit shall be monitored initially upon 

designation, and annually thereafter, and 

(C) The annual monitoring of all valves in the designated process unit shall 

be completed within one week. 

(D) Valve leaks detected shall be repaired within 15 days, except if delay of 

repair applies, in accordance with 40 CFR 61.242-7(d) and (e). 

(10) As an alternative to complying with the monitoring requirements in E.2.1 (d)(6), 

above, with respect to monitoring requirements alone, valves may comply with 

the alternative standards for valves-skip period leak detection and repair under 

61.243-2. This section provides, generally and in part: 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 180 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(A) All valves in the process unit shall comply initially with the monitoring 

requirements of E.2.1 (d)(6). 

(B) After 2 consecutive quarterly monitoring periods with the percent leaking 

valves in the process unit at less than or equal to 2.0 percent, upon 90 

days’ advance notice to the Administrator, the designated process unit 

may begin to skip one of the quarterly monitoring periods. 

(C) After 5 consecutive quarterly monitoring periods with the percent leaking 

valves in the process unit at less than or equal to 2.0 percent, upon 

notice to the Administrator, the designated process unit may begin to 

skip three of the quarterly monitoring periods. 

(D) If for any monitoring period the percentage of leaking valves exceeds 2.0 

percent, all valves in the process unit shall comply with the monitoring 

requirements of E.2.1 (d)(6), but may again elect to use this alternative. 

(e) Any visible leak of a liquid containing VOHAP/VOC shall be considered a leak for 

purposes of the obligation to repair. If it is not clear whether the liquid contains 

VOHAP/VOC, then Method 21 may be used to confirm whether a leak exists. For each 

component type, the relevant leak definition in E.2.2 (d) shall apply for this purpose. All 

leaks shall be marked as provided in 40 CFR 61.246(b) with a weatherproof and readily 

visible identification marked with the equipment identification number. This identification 

may be removed from the equipment after it has been successfully repaired, except that 

the identification on a leaking valve may not be removed until the valve has been 

monitored for 2 successive months without a leak being detected. 

(f) The Permittee shall initiate repair of any leak no later than 5 calendar days after 

identification, and complete the repair within 15 days after identification, except where 

delay of repair is allowed under 40 CFR 61.242-10. This shall not affect repair periods 

under Condition E.2.1 (d)(3). 40 CFR 61.242-10 provides, generally and in part: 

(A) Delay of repair of equipment for which leaks have been detected will be allowed 

if repair within 15 days is technically infeasible without a process unit shutdown. 

Repair of this equipment shall occur before the end of the next process unit 

shutdown. 

(B) Delay of repair of equipment for which leaks have been detected will be allowed 

for equipment that is isolated from the process and that does not remain in 

VOC/VOHAP service. 

(C) Delay of repair for valves will be allowed if emissions immediate repair would 

result in greater emissions than delay of repair, and if purged material generated 

during the repair is collected and destroyed or recovered in a control device. 

(D) Delay of repair for pumps will be allowed if the repair requires the use of a dual 

mechanical seal system, and is completed within 6 months. 

(E) Delay of repair beyond a process unit shutdown will be allowed for a valve if 

valve assembly replacement is necessary during the process unit shutdown, but 

the supplies, although adequately stocked, have been depleted. Delay of repair 

beyond the second process unit shutdown is not allowed unless the second 

shutdown occurs sooner than 6 months after the first shutdown. 

(g) Alternative means of emission limitations not already included in 40 CFR 61, Subpart V 

may be approved in accordance with 40 CFR 61.242-1(d) and 61.244 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 181 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

E.2.2 Exceptions to LDAR Standards for BPM Waste System Components 

The following equipment types are not subject to the LDAR standards described in E.2.1: 

(a) Research and development facilities, activities and equipment; 

(b) Components on transportation equipment and containers such as tanker trucks, railroad 

cars, and drums (40 CFR 63.1256 and 40 CFR 63, Subpart DD); 

(c) BPM process systems including non-waste storage and process operations (covered by 

Section E.1 of this permit); 

(d) Utilities and non-process lines; 

(e) Components in vacuum service (40 CFR 61.242-1); 

(f) Equipment in VOC/VOHAP service that is in such service less than 300 hours per 

calendar year (40 CFR 63.680(c)(3)(iii)); and 

(g) Closed loop heat exchange systems. 

 

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-19] 

E.2.3 Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements 

(a) Records shall be kept in accordance with 61.246, including but not limited to: 

(1) Identification of components that are subject to the rule with information 

indicating their method of compliance, with justifications and signatures as 

appropriate. No identification is required for welded fittings; 

(2) For valves complying via the “skip period” alternative, a schedule for monitoring 

the valves and the percent valves found leaking during each monitoring period; 

(3) Changes to each dual mechanical seal system design and operating criteria, 

including seal system failure criteria; 

(4) List of equipment designated as unsafe to monitor/inspect or difficult to 

monitor/inspect, with the reason for the designation, and a copy of the plan for 

monitoring or inspecting such equipment; 

(5) Records of leaks detected, repair information, and delays of repair; 

(6) Records of compliance tests on equipment (compressors, pumps, or valves) 

designated for no detectable emissions and for pressure relief devices in 

gas/vapor service; 

(7) Records for closed-vent systems and control devices, subject to E.2.1 (d)(8); 

(8) Records of information supporting designation that components are not in 

VOHAP/VOC service or are in vacuum service; 

(9) Identification of components exempt because they are in VOC/VOHAP service 

for less than 300 hours per year; 

(10) Records of alternative means of compliance determination; and 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 182 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(11) Records may be kept in one or more recordkeeping systems, providing each 

record is identified by process unit. 

(b) Condition E.2.3(b) was deleted pursuant to Administrative Permit Amendment 157-

20003-00006. 

(c) Reporting requirements shall be conducted in accordance with 61.247, including: 

(1) LDAR Periodic Reports shall cover the periods from January 1 to June 30, and 

July 1 to December 31, respectively. Reports shall be submitted 30 days 

following the 6-month period. The report shall include any revisions to the 

information reported earlier if the method of compliance has changed since the 

last report. The report shall also contain the following information, divided and 

identified by process unit: 

(A) For each month during the period covered by the report, the number of 

leaks detected for valves, pumps, and compressors and the number not 

repaired within 15 days, with the facts that explain any delay of repairs, 

and, where appropriate, why a process unit shutdown was technically 

infeasible; 

(B) The results of all performance tests and monitoring to determine 

compliance with the alternative standards for valves at 40 CFR 61.243-1 

and 61.243-2; 

(C) Results of all monitoring and performance tests required to determine 

compliance with no detectable emissions; and 

(D) The dates of process unit shutdowns which occurred during the reporting 

period. 

Modifications and Construction Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-10.5, 326 IAC 2-7-12, 326 IAC 2-2]

E.2.4 Modifications and Construction: Advance Approval of Permit Conditions

(a) The Permittee may modify any existing emission units listed in this section of the permit 

without obtaining a source modification approval (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-

10.5), a Title V permit modification (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-2), 

provided the modified emission units are subject to the same applicable requirements 

listed in this D section, and the Permittee shall comply with the Change Management and 

Flexible Permit provisions in Section F.1 of this permit. 

(b) The Permittee may construct and install new emission units of the types described in this 

D section without obtaining a source modification approval (otherwise required by 326 

IAC 2-7-10.5), a Title V permit modification (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-2), 

provided the new emission units are subject to the same applicable requirements listed in 

this D section, and the Permittee shall comply with the Change Management and Flexible 

Permit provisions in Section F.1 of this permit. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 183 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION F.1 Change Management and Flexible Permit Conditions 

Facility description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The information described in the following paragraphs is descriptive information and does not constitute 

enforceable conditions: 

(a) The areas of the plant site listed below are subject to the change management and flexible permit 

conditions described in this F section. These conditions apply to all emission units listed in the 

specific sections of the permit listed below and emission units added to the site pursuant to the 

provisions of this section: 

(1) D.6 BPM - Process Operations [referred to as “BPM”] 

(2) D.7 BPM Support – Solvent Recovery Operations 

(3) D.8 BPM Support – Individual Drain Systems 

(4) D.9 BPM Support – Solvent Storage Tank Operations 

(5) D.10 BPM Support – Waste Storage Tank Operations 

(6) D.11 BPM Support – Waste Containers 

(7) D.12 BPM Control Systems – T49 Liquid Waste Incinerator 

(8) D.13 BPM Control Systems – T149 Solids-Liquid Waste Incinerator 

(9) D.14 BPM Control Systems – RTO Operations 

(10) D.15 BPM Control Systems – T79 Fume Incinerator Operations 

(b) The following operation is not subject to the change management provisions of this section 

except for the VOC emission limit requirements in Sections F.1.1(e) and F.1.7(c): 

(1) D.18 BPM Support – Chemical Wastewater Treatment Plant 

(c) The operations in the areas listed below are not subject to the change management and flexible 

permit conditions in this G section: 

(1) D.1 Utilities 

(2) D.2 Utilities Support 

(3) D.3 – D.5 Fermented Products 

(4) D.16 Research and Development Operations 

(5) D.19 BPM Transfer Activities 

(6) Insignificant Activities described in Section A and outside the BPM production and 

support operations 

Emission limits and standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

F.1.1 Emission limits [326 IAC 2-2] 

(a) Carbon monoxide (CO) emissions from the facilities operating under the flexible permit 

conditions shall not exceed 150 tons per 12-month period, rolled on a calendar month 

basis. Carbon monoxide emissions from the T79 fume incinerators shall not exceed 30 

tons per 12-month period, rolled on a calendar month basis. 

(b) Fluoride (F) emissions from the facilities operating under the flexible permit conditions 

shall not exceed 6 tons per 12-month period, rolled on a calendar month basis. Fluoride 

emissions from the T79 fume incinerators shall not exceed 2 tons per 12-month period, 

rolled on a calendar month basis. 

(c) Nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions from the facilities operating under the flexible permit 

conditions shall not exceed 300 tons per 12-month period, rolled on a calendar month 

basis. Nitrogen oxide emissions from the T79 fume incinerators shall not exceed 30 tons 

per 12-month period, rolled on a calendar month basis. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 184 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(d) Sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions from the facilities operating under the flexible permit 

conditions shall not exceed 300 tons per 12-month period, rolled on a calendar month 

basis. Sulfur dioxide emissions from the T79 fume incinerators shall not exceed 5 tons 

per 12-month period, rolled on a calendar month basis. 

(e) Volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions from the facilities operating under the 

flexible permit conditions shall not exceed 300 tons per 12-month period, rolled on a 

calendar month basis. 

F.1.2 Site modifications and advance approval of modifications [326 IAC 2-7-5(9)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(16)] 

The Permittee may make modifications described in subsection (a) below to the operations in 

Sections D.6 through D.15 of this permit. If actual emissions do not exceed the limits in section 

F.1.1, and the Permittee complies with the other provisions of this section, then the Permittee is 

not required to obtain a source modification approval (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-10.5), a 

Title V permit modification (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-7-12), or a Prevention of Significant 

Deterioration permit (otherwise required by 326 IAC 2-2). 

(a) Permitted modifications 

The Permittee may implement changes, including but not limited to, the following 

modifications without triggering the administrative review processes described above: 

(1) BPM Process Operations: 

(A) A change in bulk pharmaceutical products or intermediate products 

manufactured; 

(B) A change in raw materials stored and utilized; 

(C) A change in the method of operation to a process or existing equipment; 

(D) Piping changes, including but not limited to, process piping, waste piping 

and fume transport piping; 

(E) A physical change to existing equipment; 

(F) Reconstruction or replacement of existing equipment, including but not 

limited to, process tanks, crystallizers, distillation operations, filters, 

centrifuges, and dryers; 

(G) Installation of new equipment, including but not limited to, process tanks, 

crystallizers, distillation operations, filters, centrifuges, and dryers; 

(H) Reconstruction or replacement of existing production buildings; and 

(2) BPM Support Operations: 

(A) A change in solvent material recovered; 

(B) A change in raw materials stored and utilized; 

(C) A change in the method of operation to a process or existing equipment; 

(D) Piping changes, including but not limited to, process piping, waste piping 

and fume transport piping; 

(E) A physical change to existing equipment; 

(F) Reconstruction or replacement of existing equipment, including but not 

limited to, process tanks, receivers, stills, storage tanks, and container 

transfer operations; 

(G) Installation of new equipment, including but not limited to, process tanks, 

receivers, stills, storage tanks, and container transfer operations; 

(H) Reconstruction or replacement of existing solvent recovery operations, 

storage tanks, storage tank modules, and distillation operations; and 

(3) T49 liquid waste incinerator and T149 solids-liquid waste incinerator: 

(A) A change in waste materials disposed in the incinerators; 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 185 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(B) A change in the use of portable containers, including but not limited to, 

drums, melons, and tank trailers; 

(C) A change in the method of operation that does not affect compliance with 

40 CFR 63, Subpart EEE; 

(D) Piping changes; 

(E) A physical change that does not affect compliance with 40 CFR 63, 

Subpart EEE; 

(F) Reconstruction or replacement of incinerator components and support 

equipment, including but not limited to, cooling towers and waste 

container management; and 

(G) Installation of new incinerator equipment components, support 

equipment or emission control equipment. 

(b) Advance approval and applicable requirements 

In addition to the emission limits identified in Condition F.1.1 of this permit, the emission 

limits and standards, compliance demonstration requirements, compliance monitoring 

requirements, record keeping requirements, reporting requirements, and other permit 

conditions applicable to the type of equipment or operation being modified, replaced, 

reconstructed or installed are described in Sections D.6 through D.15 of this permit. 

Each modification will be subject to the relevant provisions of those permit conditions. If 

a modification would cause an applicable requirement that is not described in this permit 

to apply, the Permittee must obtain a source modification approval if otherwise required 

by 326 IAC 2-7-10.5 and a Title V permit modification pursuant to 326 IAC 2-7-12. 

Testing and Monitoring Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-6(1) (6)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

F.1.3 Carbon monoxide (CO) emission limit determination 

The Permittee shall determine actual annual emissions by employing the following techniques: 

(a) The following requirements apply to the RTOs, the T49 liquid waste incinerator, and the 

T149 solids-liquid waste incinerator: 

(1) CO measurement: The Permittee shall measure CO concentration in the 

exhaust of with a CO continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) that meets 

the requirements of 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix B and 326 IAC 3. 

(2) Flow rate measurement: The Permittee shall measure the actual exhaust gas 

flow rate from the RTOs and T149 solids-liquid waste incinerator, and measure 

the combustion and atomized air flow rate into the T49 liquid waste incinerator. 

(3) Mass emission calculation: The Permittee shall calculate CO emissions, in 

tons, each calendar month by using the CEMS data and flow rate data. 

(4) Minimum data collection requirements:

(A) For the RTOs, the Permittee shall monitor and record CO concentrations 

as required in Section D.14. 

(B) For the T49 liquid waste incinerator, the Permittee shall monitor and 

record CO concentrations as required in Section D.12. 

(C) For the T149 solids-liquid waste incinerator, the Permittee shall monitor 

and record CO concentrations as required in Section D.13. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 186 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(5) Data substitution: 

(A) During periods of CEMS calibration, the Permittee shall substitute, in 

one-minute increments, the last valid one-minute CO concentration 

measurement obtained prior to the calibration in lieu of actual readings 

from the CO CEMS for the RTO and T149 CEMS, and the last valid oneminute CO emission rate measurement obtained prior to the calibration 

in lieu of actual readings from the CO CEMS for the T49 CEMS. 

(B) During periods of flow meter calibration, the Permittee shall substitute, in 

one-minute increments, the last valid one-minute exhaust gas flow rate 

measurement obtained prior to the calibration in lieu of actual readings 

from the flow meter. 

(C) During periods of CEMS maintenance, malfunction, repair, or other 

periods of invalid CO data collection, the Permittee shall substitute the 

following data in lieu of actual readings from the CO CEMS: 

(i) When combusting only natural gas, the following CO mass 

emission rates shall be substituted: 

(1) RTO CO mass emission rate = 0.05 lb/min 

(2) T49 CO mass emission rate = 0.10 lb/min 

(3) T149 CO mass emission rate = 0.07 lb/min 

(ii) When incinerating a waste stream, the following CO 

concentrations shall be substituted: 

(1) RTO CO concentration = 73 ppmv 

(2) T49 CO concentration = 100 ppmv 

(3) T149 CO concentration = 100 ppmv 

(D) During periods of flow meter maintenance, malfunction, repair, or other 

periods of invalid exhaust gas flow rate data collection, the Permittee 

shall substitute the following data in lieu of actual readings from the flow 

meter: 

(i) When combusting only natural gas, the following CO mass 

emission rates shall be substituted: 

(1) RTO CO mass emission rate = 0.05 lb/min 

(2) T49 CO mass emission rate = 0.10 lb/min 

(3) T149 CO mass emission rate = 0.07 lb/min 

 

(ii) When incinerating a waste stream, the following exhaust gas 

flow rates shall be substituted: 

(1) RTO exhaust gas flow rate = 93,000 scfm 

(2) T49 exhaust gas flow rate = 17,735 dscfm 

(3) T149 exhaust gas flow rate = 14,340 dscfm 

(6) Emissions during RTO bypass periods: When determining compliance with 

the CO emission limit, the Permittee shall include any known CO emissions from 

BPM production buildings not emitted through the RTO due to diversions at the 

fume transport system. The Permittee may use engineering calculation methods 

based on ideal gas law equations, stoichiometry, or mass balance, to estimate 

these emissions. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 187 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(b) The following requirements apply to the T79 fume incinerators (309 and 310): 

(1) Natural gas usage: The Permittee shall determine the amount of natural gas 

burned by the T79 fume incinerators each calendar month. 

(2) Emission calculation: The Permittee shall calculate CO emissions, in tons, 

each calendar month by multiplying the monthly natural gas usage, in mmscf, by 

an emission factor of 84 lbs/mmscf and converting the resulting emissions to 

tons. 

(3) Data substitution: During periods of time when the Permittee is unable to 

determine natural gas usage because of auditing, calibration, maintenance, 

malfunction, repair, or other periods when the natural gas meters for the T79 

fume incinerators are not collecting valid data, the Permittee shall substitute a 

natural gas consumption rate for each incinerator of 0.0075 mmscf/hour [based 

on the nominal heat input rate of 7.626 MMBtu/hr per incinerator]. 

F.1.4 Fluorides emission limit determination 

The Permittee shall determine actual annual emissions by employing the following techniques: 

(a) The following requirements apply to the RTOs and the T79 fume incinerators: 

(1) Uncontrolled hydrogen fluoride emissions: The Permittee shall determine the 

mass of fluorine atoms emitted to the RTOs and T79 fume incinerators [as 

components of fluorinated solvents] by BPM and BPM Support operations, by 

using engineering calculation methods based on ideal gas law equations, 

stoichiometry and mass balance. All fluorine atoms shall be considered emitted 

as hydrogen fluoride (HF) after combustion in the RTOs or the T79 fume 

incinerators. 

(2) HF control efficiency: The Permittee shall base fluoride emissions on an RTO 

and T79 scrubber control efficiency of 98% or a control efficiency determined 

from an approved stack test. If the compliance monitoring data is not available or 

indicates the scrubbers are not achieving this control efficiency, the Permittee 

shall use a control efficiency of zero percent (0%). 

(3) Emission calculation: The Permittee shall calculate fluoride emissions, in tons, 

for each calendar month by multiplying the amount of HF created by combustion 

of the fluorine atoms in the RTOs and T79 fume incinerators by the respective 

HF control efficiency. 

(4) Emissions during RTO bypass periods: When determining compliance with 

the fluoride emission limit, the Permittee shall include any known fluoride 

emissions from BPM production buildings not emitted through the RTO due to 

diversions at the fume transport system. The Permittee may use engineering 

calculation methods based on ideal gas law equations, stoichiometry, and mass 

balance, to estimate these emissions. 

(b) The following requirements apply to the T49 liquid waste incinerator and the T149 solidsliquid waste incinerator: 

(1) Uncontrolled hydrogen fluoride emissions: When burning liquid wastes, the 

Permittee shall determine the mass of fluorine atoms burned in the incinerators 

by sampling the liquid waste and analyzing the sample for fluorine content, no 

less frequently than once per quarter. All fluorine atoms shall be considered 

emitted as hydrogen fluoride (HF). When burning solid wastes in the T149 

solids-liquid waste incinerator, the Permittee shall determine monthly HF 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 188 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

emissions by multiplying an emission factor of 0.149 pounds/ton solid waste 

burned by the monthly solid waste throughput. 

(2) HF control efficiency: The Permittee shall base fluoride emissions on an 

incinerator scrubber control efficiency of 98.0% or a control efficiency determined 

from an approved stack test. If the compliance monitoring data is not available or 

indicates the scrubbers are not achieving this control efficiency, the Permittee 

shall use a control efficiency of zero percent (0%). 

(3) Emission calculation: The Permittee shall calculate fluoride emissions, in tons, 

for each calendar month by multiplying the amount of uncontrolled HF emissions 

by the HF control efficiency. 

F.1.5 Nitrogen oxides (NOX) emission limit determination 

The Permittee shall determine actual annual emissions by employing the following techniques: 

(a) The following requirements apply to the RTOs, the T49 liquid waste incinerator, and the 

T149 solids-liquid waste incinerator: 

(1) NOx measurement: The Permittee shall measure NOx concentration in the 

exhaust of with a NOx continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) in 

accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix B and 326 IAC 3. 

(2) Flow rate measurement: The Permittee shall measure the actual exhaust gas 

flow rate from the RTOs and T149 solids-liquid waste incinerator, and measure 

the combustion and atomized air flow rate into the T49 liquid waste incinerator 

with a system. 

(3) Emission calculation: The Permittee shall calculate NOx emissions, in tons, 

each calendar month by using the CEMS data and flow rate data. 

(4) Data substitution: 

(A) During periods of CEMS calibration, the Permittee shall substitute, in 

one-minute increments, the last valid one-minute NOx concentration 

measurement obtained prior to the calibration in lieu of actual readings 

from the NOx CEMS for the RTO and T149 CEMS, and the last valid 

one-minute NOx emission rate measurement obtained prior to the 

calibration in lieu of actual readings from the NOx CEMS for the T49 

CEMS. 

(B) During periods of flow meter calibration, the Permittee shall substitute, in 

one-minute increments, the last valid one-minute exhaust gas flow rate 

measurement obtained prior to the calibration in lieu of actual readings 

from the flow meter. 

(C) During periods of CEMS maintenance, malfunction, repair, or other 

periods of invalid NOx data collection, the Permittee shall substitute the 

following data in lieu of actual readings from the NOx CEMS: 

(i) When combusting only natural gas, the following NOx mass 

emission rates shall be substituted: 

(1) RTO NOx mass emission rate = 0.03 lb/min 

(2) T49 NOx mass emission rate = 0.12 lb/min 

(3) T149 NOx mass emission rate = 0.08 lb/min 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 189 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(ii) When incinerating a waste stream, the following NOx 

concentrations shall be substituted: 

(1) RTO NOx concentration = 91 ppmv 

(2) T49 NOx concentration = 975 ppmvdc 

(3) T149 NOx concentration = 170 ppmvdc 

(D) During periods of flow meter maintenance, malfunction, repair, or other 

periods of invalid exhaust gas flow rate data collection, the Permittee 

shall substitute the following data in lieu of actual readings from the flow 

meter: 

(i) When combusting only natural gas, the following NOx mass 

emission rates shall be substituted: 

(1) RTO NOx mass emission rate = 0.03 lb/min 

(2) T49 NOx mass emission rate = 0.12 lb/min 

(3) T149 NOx mass emission rate = 0.08 lb/min 

(ii) When incinerating a waste stream, the following exhaust gas 

flow rates shall be substituted: 

(1) RTO exhaust gas flow rate = 93,000 scfm 

(2) T49 exhaust gas flow rate = 17,735 dscfm 

(3) T149 exhaust gas flow rate = 14,340 dscfm 

(5) Minimum data collection requirements: 

(A) For the RTOs, the Permittee shall monitor and record NOx 

concentrations as required in Section D.14. 

(B) For the T49 liquid waste incinerator, the Permittee shall monitor and 

record NOx concentrations as required in Condition D.12. 

(C) For the T149 solids-liquid waste incinerator, the Permittee shall monitor 

and record NOx concentrations as required in Section D.13. 

(6) Emissions during RTO bypass periods: When determining compliance with 

the NOx emission limit, the Permittee shall include any known NOx emissions 

from BPM production buildings or storage tank modules not emitted through the 

RTO due to diversions in the fume transport system. The Permittee may use 

engineering calculation methods based on ideal gas law equations, 

stoichiometry, or mass balance to estimate these emissions. 

(b) The following requirements apply to the T79 Fume Incinerators: 

(1) NOx emission calculation for natural gas usage: The Permittee shall 

determine the amount of natural gas burned by the T79 Fume Incinerators each 

calendar month. The Permittee shall calculate NOx emissions from natural gas 

combustion, in tons, each calendar month by multiplying the monthly natural gas 

usage by an emission factor of 50 lbs/mmscf and converting the resulting 

emissions to tons. 

(2) NOx emission calculation for combustion of nitrogen-containing solvents: 

The Permittee shall determine the mass of nitrogen atoms emitted to the T79 

fume incinerators [as components of solvents containing nitrogen] by the BPM 

Support operations by using engineering calculations based on ideal gas law 

equations, stoichiometry, or mass balance. Six (6%) of the nitrogen atoms shall 

be considered emitted as nitrogen oxides after combustion in the T79 fume 

incinerators. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 190 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(3) Data substitution: During periods of time when the Permittee is unable to 

determine natural gas usage because of auditing, calibration, maintenance, 

malfunction, repair, or other periods when the natural gas meters for the T79 

fume incinerators are not collecting valid data, the Permittee shall determine NOx 

emissions based on a natural gas consumption rate of 0.0075 mmscf/hour 

[based on the nominal heat input rate of 7.626 MMBtu/hr per incinerator]. 

F.1.6 Sulfur dioxide (SO2) emission limit determination 

The Permittee shall determine actual annual emissions by employing the following techniques: 

(a) The following requirements apply to RTOs, the T49 liquid waste incinerator, and the T149 

solids-liquid waste incinerator: 

(1) SO2 measurement: The Permittee shall measure SO2 concentration in the 

exhaust of RTO, and incinerators with a SO2 continuous emission monitoring 

system (CEMS) that meets the requirements of 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix B and 

326 IAC 3. 

(2) Flow rate measurement: The Permittee shall measure the actual exhaust gas 

flow rate from the RTOs and the T149 solids-liquid waste incinerator, and 

measure the combustion and atomized air flow rate into the T49 liquid waste 

incinerator. 

(3) Emission calculation: The Permittee shall calculate SO2 emissions, in tons, 

each calendar month by using the CEMS data and flow rate data. 

(4) Data substitution: 

(A) During periods of CEMS calibration, the Permittee shall substitute, in 

one-minute increments, the last valid one-minute SO2 concentration 

measurement obtained prior to the calibration in lieu of actual readings 

from the SO2 CEMS for the RTO and T149 CEMS, and the last valid 

one-minute SO2 emission rate measurement obtained prior to the 

calibration in lieu of actual readings from the SO2 CEMS for the T49 

CEMS. 

(B) During periods of flow meter calibration, the Permittee shall substitute, in 

one-minute increments, the last valid one-minute exhaust gas flow rate 

measurement obtained prior to the calibration in lieu of actual readings 

from the flow meter. 

(C) During periods of CEMS maintenance, malfunction, repair, or other 

periods of invalid SO2 data collection, the Permittee shall substitute the 

following data in lieu of actual readings from the SO2 CEMS: 

(i) When combusting only natural gas, the following SO2 mass 

emission rates shall be substituted: 

(1) RTO SO2 mass emission rate = 0.0004 lb/min 

(2) T49 SO2 mass emission rate = 0.0007 lb/min 

(3) T149 SO2 mass emission rate = 0.0005 lb/min 

(ii) When incinerating a waste stream, the following SO2

concentrations shall be substituted: 

(1) RTO SO2 concentration = 100 ppmv 

(2) T49 SO2 Concentration = 500 ppmv 

(3) T149 SO2 concentration = 400 ppmv 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 191 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(D) During periods of flow meter maintenance, malfunction, repair, or other 

periods of invalid exhaust gas flow rate data collection, the Permittee 

shall substitute the following data in lieu of actual readings from the flow 

meter: 

(i) When combusting only natural gas, the following SO2 mass 

emission rates shall be substituted: 

(1) RTO SO2 mass emission rate = 0.0004 lb/min 

(2) T49 SO2 mass emission rate = 0.0007 lb/min 

(3) T149 SO2 mass emission rate = 0.0005 lb/min 

(ii) When incinerating a waste stream, the following exhaust gas 

flow rates shall be substituted: 

(1) RTO exhaust gas flow rate = 93,000 scfm 

(2) T49 exhaust gas flow rate = 17,735 dscfm 

(3) T149 exhaust gas flow rate = 14,340 dscfm 

(5) Minimum data collection requirements: 

(A) For the RTOs, the Permittee shall monitor and record SO2

concentrations as required in Section D.14. 

(B) For the T49 liquid waste incinerator, the Permittee shall monitor and 

record SO2 concentrations as required in Condition D.12. 

(C) For the T149 solids-liquid waste incinerator, the Permittee shall monitor 

and record SO2 concentrations as required in Condition D.13. 

(6) Emissions during RTO bypass periods: When determining compliance with 

the SO2 emission limit, the Permittee shall include any known SO2 emissions 

from BPM production buildings and storage tank modules not emitted through the 

RTO due to diversions in the fume transport system. The Permittee may use 

engineering calculation methods based on ideal gas law equations, 

stoichiometry, or mass balance to estimate these emissions. 

(b) The following requirements apply to the T79 fume incinerators: 

(1) SO2 emission calculation for natural gas usage: The Permittee shall 

determine the amount of natural gas burned by the T79 fume incinerators each 

calendar month. The Permittee shall calculate SO2 emissions from natural gas 

combustion, in tons, each calendar month by multiplying the monthly natural gas 

usage by an emission factor of 0.6 lbs/mmscf and converting the resulting 

emissions to tons. 

(2) Uncontrolled SO2 emission calculation for combustion of sulfur-containing 

solvents: The Permittee shall determine the mass of sulfur atoms emitted to the 

T79 fume incinerators [as components of solvents containing sulfur] by the BPM 

Support operations by using engineering calculation methods based on ideal gas 

law equations, stoichiometry, or mass balance. All of the sulfur atoms shall be 

considered converted to SO2 as a result of combustion in the T79 fume 

incinerators. 

(3) SO2 control efficiency: The Permittee shall base SO2 emissions on T79 

scrubber control efficiency of 95%. If the compliance monitoring data is not 

available or indicates the scrubbers are not achieving this control efficiency, the 

Permittee shall use a control efficiency of zero percent (0%). 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 192 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(4) Emission calculation: The Permittee shall calculate SO2 emissions, in tons, 

each calendar month by multiplying the amount of SO2 created by combustion of 

the sulfur atoms in the T79 fume incinerators by the scrubber SO2 control 

efficiency. 

(5) Data substitution: During periods of time when the Permittee is unable to 

determine natural gas usage because of auditing, calibration, maintenance, 

malfunction, repair, or other periods when the natural gas meters for the T79 

fume incinerators are not collecting data properly, the Permittee shall determine 

SO2 emissions based on a natural gas consumption rate of 0.0075 mmscf/hour 

[based on the nominal heat input rate of 7.626 MMBtu/hr per incinerator]. 

F.1.7 Volatile organic compound (VOC) emission limit determination 

The Permittee shall determine actual annual emissions by employing the following techniques: 

(a) The following requirements apply to the RTOs when compliance is based on the 20 ppmv 

alternative standard, the T49 liquid waste incinerator, and the T149 solids-liquid waste 

incinerator: 

(1) VOC measurement: 

 

(A) For the RTO operations, the Permittee shall directly measure TOC 

concentration, as methane, in the exhaust gas using a TOC continuous 

emission monitoring system (CEMS) that meets the requirements of 40 

CFR Part 63. The Permittee shall assume VOC, a subset of total 

organic compounds (TOC), is equal to TOC. 

(B) For the T49 liquid waste incinerator and the T149 solids-liquid waste 

incinerator, the Permittee shall use 10 ppmdvc methane or shall use the 

highest hourly rolling average HC level achieved during the DRE test 

runs as the TOC concentration in the exhaust gas, as long as the CO 

concentration, as measured by the CO CEMS, is less than 100 ppmvdc, 

averaged over a rolling hourly period. VOC, a subset of total organic 

compounds (TOC), shall be equal to TOC. 

(2) Flow rate measurement: The Permittee shall measure the actual exhaust gas 

flow rate from the RTOs and the T149 solids-liquid waste incinerator, and 

measure the combustion and atomized air flow rate into the T49 liquid waste 

incinerator. 

(3) Emission calculation: The Permittee shall calculate VOC emissions, in tons, 

each calendar month by using the TOC CEMS concentration data, measured as 

methane (MW = 16), and exhaust gas flow rate data. 

(4) Data substitution: 

(A) During periods of CEMS calibration, the Permittee shall substitute, in 

one-minute increments, the last valid one-minute TOC/CO concentration 

measurement obtained prior to the calibration in lieu of actual readings 

from the TOC/CO CEMS. 

(B) During periods of flow meter calibration, the Permittee shall substitute, in 

one-minute increments, the last valid one-minute exhaust gas flow rate 

measurement obtained prior to the calibration in lieu of actual readings 

from the flow meter. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 193 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(C) During periods of CEMS maintenance, malfunction, repair, or other 

periods of invalid TOC/CO data collection, the Permittee shall substitute 

the following data in lieu of actual readings from the TOC/CO CEMS: 

(i) When combusting only natural gas, the following VOC mass 

emission rates shall be substituted: 

(1) RTO VOC mass emission rate = 0.003 lb/min 

(2) T49 VOC mass emission rate = 0.007 lb/min 

(3) T149 VOC mass emission rate = 0.004 lb/min 

(ii) When incinerating a waste stream, the following TOC 

concentrations shall be substituted: 

(1) RTO TOC concentration = 20 ppmv methane 

(2) T49 TOC concentration = 10 ppmv methane 

(3) T149 TOC concentration = 10 ppmv methane 

(D) During periods of flow meter maintenance, malfunction, repair, or other 

periods of invalid exhaust gas flow rate data collection, the Permittee 

shall substitute the following data in lieu of actual readings from the flow 

meter: 

(i) When combusting only natural gas, the following VOC mass 

emission rates shall be substituted: 

(1) RTO VOC mass emission rate = 0.003 lb/min 

(2) T49 VOC mass emission rate = 0.007 lb/min 

(3) T149 VOC mass emission rate = 0.004 lb/min 

(ii) When incinerating a waste stream, the following exhaust gas 

flow rates shall be substituted: 

(1) RTO exhaust gas flow rate = 93,000 scfm 

(2) T49 exhaust gas flow rate = 17,735 dscfm 

(3) T149 exhaust gas flow rate = 14,340 dscfm 

(5) Minimum data collection requirements: 

(A) For the RTOs, the Permittee shall monitor and record VOC 

concentrations as required in condition D.14. 

(B) For the T49 liquid waste incinerator, the Permittee shall monitor and 

record VOC concentrations as required in condition D.12. 

(C) For the T149 solids-liquid waste incinerator, the Permittee shall monitor 

and record VOC concentrations as required in D.13. 

(6) Emissions during RTO bypass periods: The Permittee shall include any 

known VOC emissions from BPM production buildings not emitted through the 

RTO due to diversions in the fume transport system. The Permittee may use 

engineering calculation methods based on ideal gas law equations, 

stoichiometry, or mass balance to estimate these emissions. 

(b) The following requirements apply to the RTOs when compliance is based on the 98% 

control efficiency standard and the T79 fume incinerators: 

(1) VOC emission calculation for natural gas usage: The Permittee shall 

determine the amount of natural gas burned by the RTOs and the T79 fume 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 194 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

incinerators each calendar month. The Permittee shall calculate VOC emissions 

from natural gas combustion, in tons, each calendar month by multiplying the 

monthly natural gas usage by an emission factor of 5.5 lbs/mmscf and converting 

the resulting emissions to tons. 

(2) VOC emission calculation from BPM production operations and BPM 

support operations exhausting to the RTOs and the T79 fume incinerator 

system: The Permittee shall estimate the uncontrolled VOC emissions from the 

BPM production operations and the BPM support operations exhausting to the 

RTOs and the T79 fume incinerator system by using engineering calculation 

methods based on ideal gas law equations, stoichiometry, or mass balance. The 

Permittee shall base VOC emissions on an RTO and T79 fume incinerator 

control efficiency of 98%. If the compliance monitoring data is not available or 

indicates the RTO or T79 fume incinerator is not achieving this control efficiency, 

the Permittee shall use a control efficiency of zero percent (0%). 

(3) Data substitution: During periods of time when the Permittee is unable to 

determine natural gas usage because of auditing, calibration, maintenance, 

malfunction, repair, or other periods when the natural gas meters for the RTOs or 

T79 fume incinerator system are not collecting valid data, the Permittee may 

assume that natural gas is consumed at a rate of 0.0075 mmscf/hour [based on 

the nominal heat input rate of 7.626 MMBtu/hr per incinerator]. 

(c) Fugitive VOC emissions from BPM and BPM Support Operations, including the Chemical 

Wastewater Treatment Plant: The Permittee shall determine monthly fugitive VOC 

emissions using the following calculation methods: 

(1) Emission factors: The Permittee shall develop emission factors to calculate 

monthly fugitive VOC emissions. The emission factors shall be developed 

according to the following methods. 

(A) For each VOC compound that the Permittee reports release of in the 

annual SARA Title III TRI report (“reportable SARA VOCs”), the 

Permittee shall develop a compound-specific emission factor, expressed 

in pounds of emissions per 100 pounds of solvent usage. Reportable 

SARA VOC emission factors shall be derived from mass-balance data 

used to submit SARA reports. Each compound-specific fugitive emission 

factor for reportable SARA VOCs shall be updated and applied to 

monthly fugitive emission calculations beginning July 1 of each year. 

(B) For VOC compounds not reported under SARA Title III, the Permittee 

shall use a generic fugitive emission factor, expressed in pounds of 

emissions per 100 pounds of solvent usage. The generic fugitive 

emission factor shall be equal to the highest representative emission 

factor developed in (A) above for a reportable SARA VOC used as a raw 

material in production processes. In the alternative, the Permittee may 

develop and apply a compound-specific emission factor for a compound 

not reported under SARA Title III. The generic fugitive emission factor 

and any compound-specific fugitive emission factor shall be updated and 

applied to monthly fugitive emission calculations beginning July 1 of each 

year. 

(2) Emission calculation method: For VOCs with a compound-specific emission 

factor described in (1), the Permittee shall calculate monthly fugitive VOC 

emissions by multiplying the compound-specific emission factor by the 

corresponding compound-specific monthly solvent usage. For VOCs without a 

compound-specific emission factor, the Permittee shall calculate monthly fugitive 

VOC emissions by multiplying the generic emission factor described in (1)(B) by 

the monthly solvent usage of those compounds. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 195 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Record keeping and reporting [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-19] 

F.1.8 Records and reporting emission limits [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-19] 

(a) The Permittee shall record and maintain records of all information including all 

measurements and calculations described in Sections F.1.3 through F.1.7. 

(b) The Permittee shall submit a quarterly report of actual emissions of CO, fluorides, NOx, 

SO2, and VOC, as determined in accordance with Sections F.1.4 through F.1.8, to the 

address listed in Section C – General Reporting Requirements, within thirty (30) days 

after the end of the calendar quarter being reported. This report requires the certification 

by the “responsible official” as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

F.1.9 Change management evaluation process 

For purposes of the requirements of the Pharmaceutical MACT standards [40 CFR 63, Subpart 

GGG], the Permittee shall employ a change management evaluation process to determine 

whether changes will affect compliance. This change evaluation process shall include the 

following elements: 

(a) New processes, process changes, and physical changes to process equipment that 

increase hazardous air pollutant emissions from process vents, wastewater streams, and 

storage tanks will be considered “new process operating scenarios”. Changes which 

affect fugitive emissions equipment components will not be considered new operating 

scenarios and will be managed per the relevant provisions of the leak detection and 

repair program, which includes provisions addressing the addition of, and changes to, 

components. 

(b) Each new process operating scenario [as defined in F.1.10 (a)] will be reviewed to 

determine whether the change will affect compliance with the emission standards under 

the Pharmaceutical MACT requirements. Compliance with the following standards will be 

evaluated: process vent standards [40 CFR 63.1254]; storage tank standards [40 CFR 

63.1253]; and wastewater streams [40 CFR 63.1256]. 

(c) Documentation of the evaluation of each new process operating scenario will contain the 

following information: 

(1) For new or changed process vents, a statement regarding the method for 

complying with 40 CFR 63.1254. The statement shall include an analysis that 

shows whether the new or changed process vents fit within an existing 

compliance demonstration, or whether another demonstration must be 

conducted. 

(2) For new or changed storage tanks, a statement regarding the method for 

complying with 40 CFR 63.1253. The statement shall include an analysis that 

shows whether the new or changed storage tank fits within an existing 

compliance demonstration, or whether another demonstration must be 

conducted. 

(3) For new or changed wastewater streams, a statement regarding the method for 

complying with 40 CFR 63.1256. The statement shall include an analysis that 

shows whether the new or changed wastewater stream fits within an existing 

compliance demonstration, or whether another demonstration must be 

conducted. 

(d) If a new process-operating scenario will trigger applicable requirements not described in 

this permit or compliance with applicable requirements will be demonstrated by 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 196 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

methodologies not described in this permit, this permit must be revised pursuant to 326 

IAC 2-7-12. 

F.1.10 Records and reporting of site modifications [326 IAC 2-7-5(16)] [326 IAC 2-7-20(a)] [40 CFR 

63.1259] [40 CFR 63.1260] 

(a) Changes made pursuant to advance approval provisions: 

The Permittee shall record and maintain records of all modifications that would have 

otherwise required a revision to this permit pursuant to 326 IAC 2-7-12 or a source 

modification approval if the provisions of 326 IAC 2-7-10.5 were applicable. 

(b) Pharmaceutical MACT operating scenarios: 

(1) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.1259(c), for all equipment subject to the pharmaceutical 

MACT requirements, the Permittee shall develop a record describing operating 

scenarios that may occur in the BPM operations and BPM Support operations. 

(2) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.1259(f)(4), for all equipment subject to the 

pharmaceutical MACT requirements, the Permittee shall list all known operating 

scenarios that may occur in the BPM operations and BPM Support operations in 

the notification of compliance status report. 

(3) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.1259(b)(8), for all equipment subject to the 

pharmaceutical MACT requirements, the Permittee shall maintain a log that 

records, which operating scenarios have been, put into effect in the BPM 

operations and BPM Support operations. 

F.1.11 Notifications for site modifications [326 IAC 2-1.1-12(e)-(f)] 

(a) The Permittee shall submit a notification for any modification that would have otherwise 

required a source modification approval if the provisions of 326 IAC 2-7-10.5 were 

applicable, to the address listed in Section C – General Reporting Requirements, at least 

ten (10) days before implementing the modification. 

(b) The notification shall include the following information: 

(1) the company name and address and source and permit identification numbers; 

(2) a description of the physical or operational change, including an estimate of the 

potential to emit of the emissions associated with the change; 

(3) an identification of the emission unit or units being changed on the layout 

diagram of the source; 

(4) the schedule for constructing each physical change and implementing each 

operational change; 

(5) identification of any applicable requirements that are applicable to the physical or 

operational change and include any monitoring, record keeping, or reporting 

requirements to assure compliance with the applicable requirements; 

(6) a statement for all regulated pollutants, except the pollutant for which the 

emissions limit has been established, that demonstrates that the physical or 

operational change will not trigger any federal or state permitting requirement for 

any regulated pollutant; and 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 197 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(7) a statement that the physical or operational change will not result in emissions 

greater than the emissions limit. 

(c) This notification does not require the certification by the “responsible official” as defined 

by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

F.1.12 Inclusion of site modifications in Pharmaceutical MACT Periodic Report 

(a) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.1260(g)(2)(vii), the Permittee shall include in the Periodic Report 

information for each new operating scenario operated since the time period covered by 

the last periodic report. These reports shall be submitted as required in Conditions 

D.14.9 or D.15.8 – Reporting Requirements. 

(b) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.1260(h)(1), whenever a new process is introduced, or a change 

in any of the information submitted in the Notification of Compliance Status Report, the 

Permittee shall submit the following information with the next Periodic report as required 

in Conditions D.14.9 or D.15.8 – Reporting Requirements: 

(1) A brief description of the process change; 

(2) A description of any modifications to standard procedures or quality assurance 

procedures; 

(3) Revisions to any of the information reported in the original Notification of 

Compliance Status Report under paragraph (f) of this section; and 

(4) Information required by the Notification of Compliance Status Report under 

paragraph (f) of this section for changes involving the addition of processes or 

equipment. 

(c) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.1260(h)(2), the Permittee must submit a report 60 days before 

the scheduled implementation date of either of the following: 

(1) Any change in the activity covered by the Precompliance report. 

(2) A change in the status of a control device from small to large. 

F.1.13 Reports of changes affected by Hazardous Waste Combustor MACT 

(a) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.1206(b)(5)(iii), a change is defined as any change in design, 

operation or maintenance practices that were documented in the comprehensive 

performance test plan, Notification of Compliance, or startup, shutdown, and malfunction 

plan. 

(b) For changes that may adversely affect compliance which are not monitored with a CEMS, 

the Permittee shall: 

(1) Notify the Administrator at least 60 days prior to the change, unless 

circumstances are documented that dictate that such prior notice is not 

reasonably feasible. 

(2) Conduct a comprehensive performance test under the requirements of 40 CFR 

63.1207(f)(1) and (g)(1) to document compliance with the affected emission 

standard(s) and establish operating parameter limits as required under 40 CFR 

63.1209, and submit the Administrator a Notification of Compliance under 40 

CFR 63.1207(j) and 40 CFR 63.1210(d); and 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 198 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(3) Not burn hazardous waste for more than a total of 720 hours after such change is 

made and prior to submitting the notification of compliance unless the 

Administrator provides a written approval to burn hazardous waste in the interim. 

(c) For changes that will not affect compliance, the Permittee shall document the change in 

the operating record upon making such change. The Permittee shall revise as necessary 

the performance test plan, Documentation of Compliance, Notification of Compliance, 

and startup, shutdown and malfunction plan to reflect these changes. 

Other flexible permit requirements 

F.1.14 Valid period for Best Available Control Technology [326 IAC 2-2-3(4)] 

The modifications that occur under this permit qualify as a single, ongoing phase of construction 

and modification to Tippecanoe Laboratories. The BACT requirements established in Sections 

D.6 through D.15 shall remain valid over the entire period of this permit. If the time between 

consecutive modifications exceeds 18 months, the Permittee shall demonstrate that the initial 

BACT determination incorporated into the permit is still valid or propose new BACT requirements. 

The Permittee shall also provide, in its application for renewal of the permit, that the initial BACT 

determination incorporated into the permit is still valid or propose new BACT requirements. Upon 

expiration of this permit, Major New Source Review requirements (Prevention of Significant 

Deterioration and Nonattainment NSR) shall apply. 

F.1.15 Emission increases from increased utilization of ancillary equipment [326 IAC 2-2] (Deleted) 

Condition F.1.15 was deleted pursuant to Administrative Permit Amendment 157-20003-00006. 

F.1.16 NSPS and NESHAP pre-construction notification and reviews 

The provisions of this permit do not relieve the Permittee of the notification and pre-construction 

approval requirements found in 40 CFR 60.7, 40 CFR 61.07, 40 CFR 61.08, and 40 CFR 63.5. If 

the Permittee constructs, reconstructs, or modifies an affected facility in a manner that requires 

notification or pre-construction approval under 40 CFR 60.7, 40 CFR 61.07, 40 CFR 61.08, or 40 

CFR 63.5, the Permittee shall comply with those requirements. 

F.1.17 Pollution Prevention Program 

The Permittee shall implement a pollution prevention program as described below: 

(a) The Permittee shall develop a pollution prevention strategy that describes the site's 

involvement and efforts to reduce the use of raw materials and reduce waste and 

emissions generation. The plan shall be available to IDEM upon request. 

(b) The Permittee shall communicate its pollution prevention strategy to the public by 

conducting public outreach meetings. 

Tippecanoe Laboratories will submit an annual report to IDEM describing specific pollution 

prevention efforts that took place during the calendar year. The report shall include an estimate 

of the air emission, wastewater, and waste reductions prevented or achieved by pollution 

prevention activities. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 199 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

SECTION G.1 Plantwide Applicability Limitations Requirements 

 

Facility description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)]

The information described in the following paragraphs is descriptive information and does not constitute 

enforceable conditions: 

The entire plant site is subject to the plantwide applicability limitations [PAL] requirements 

described in this G section. 

Source wide emission limits [326 IAC 2-2.4-7(1)] 

G.1.1 Emission limits [326 IAC 2-2.4-7(1)] 

(a) Nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions from the entire source shall not exceed 648 tons per 12 

consecutive month period with compliance determined at the end of each month. This 

provision does not supersede any other NOx emission limits contained in this permit. 

(b) Sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions from the entire source shall not exceed 2059 tons per 12-

consecutive month period, with compliance determined at the end of each month. This 

provision does not supersede any other SO2 emission limits contained in this permit. 

General PAL requirements [326 IAC 2-2.4-1] 

G.1.2 Major New Source Review Applicability [326 IAC 2-2.4-1(c)] 

Any physical change in or change in the method of operation of this source is not a major 

modification for NOx or SO2, and not subject to the review requirements of 326 IAC 2-2 provided 

the actual emissions of NOx and SO2 from the entire source do not exceed the emission limits in 

Condition G.1.1 of this permit. This provision does not supersede or affect the Flexible Permit 

requirements in Section F of this permit. 

G.1.3 General PAL requirements [326 IAC 2-2.4-7, 326 IAC 2-2.4-8, 326 IAC 2-2.4-9, 326 IAC 2-2.4-10, 

326 IAC 2-2.4-11, 326 IAC 2-2.4-15] 

(a) The requirements of this section G become effective on the issuance date of the PAL 

permit, and expire ten years after the issuance date of the PAL permit. 

(b) If the Permittee applies to renew this PAL at least six months prior to expiration of the 

PAL, but no earlier than eighteen months prior to the expiration of the PAL, then 

notwithstanding the expiration date in subsection G.1.3(a), the PAL shall continue to be 

effective until the revised permit with the renewed PAL is issued. The application must 

contain the elements described in 326 IAC 2-2.4-3 and 326 IAC 2-2.4-10. 

(c) Once this PAL expires, if not otherwise renewed, then the requirements of 326 IAC 2-2.4-

9 are applicable. 

(d) The requirements for renewing this PAL are described in 326 IAC 2-2.4-10. 

(e) The requirements for increasing the emissions limits described in Condition G.1.1 are 

described in 326 IAC 2-2.4-11. 

(f) The requirements applicable to terminating or revoking this PAL are described in 326 IAC 

2-2.4-15. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 200 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Testing and Monitoring Requirements [326 IAC 2-2.4-7(6) & (7)] [326 IAC 2-2.4-12] 

G.1.4 Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) Emission Limit Determination [326 IAC 2-2.4-7(6) & (7)] 

 [326 IAC 2-2.4-12] 

The Permittee shall determine actual annual emissions of NOx by employing the following 

techniques: 

(a) The Permittee shall calculate NOx emissions from Boilers 1, 2, and 3, in tons, each calendar 

month, by multiplying the amount of coal consumed in each calendar month by a NOx 

emission factor of 16 lb NOx/ton of coal burned. After the coal feed to Boilers No. 1, No. 2, 

and No. 3 is shutdown, or starting September 14, 2007, whichever comes first, the NOx 

emissions from these boilers shall be calculated using an emission factor of 100 lbs 

NOx/million cubic feet of natural gas burned. 

(b) The Permittee shall calculate NOx emissions from burning natural gas in Boilers 4 and 5, 

in tons, each calendar month, by multiplying the amount of natural gas burned in each 

calendar month by an NOx emission factor of 280 lb NOx/million cubic feet of natural gas 

burned in Boiler 4 and 100 lb NOx/million cubic feet of natural gas burned in Boiler 5. 

(c) The Permittee shall calculate NOx emissions from burning fuel oil in Boilers 4 and 5, in 

tons, each calendar month, by multiplying the amount of fuel oil burned in each calendar 

month by an NOx emission factor of 24 lb NOx/1000 gallons of fuel oil burned in Boiler 4 

and 20 lb NOx/1000 gallons of fuel oil burned in Boiler 5. 

(d) The Permittee shall determine NOx emissions from diesel engines, in tons, each 

calendar month, through one of the methods described in (1) and (2) below. The 

Permittee shall identify which method it used when it reports emissions pursuant to 

Condition G.1.8. 

(1) Potential to emit method: The Permittee shall use the following values, which 

represent the NOx potential to emit of the diesel engines, as the actual 

emissions: 

(A) For the T121 1250 KW diesel electrical generator – 1.5 ton/month [18.1 

ton/yr]. 

(B) For the T5 380 HP diesel emergency generator – 0.2 ton/month [2.9 

ton/yr] 

(C) For the T62 1100 KW diesel emergency generator – 0.7 ton/month [8.9 

ton/yr]. 

(D) For the T135 390 HP diesel emergency generator – 0.3 ton/month [3.0 

ton/yr]. 

(E) For the T78 58 KW diesel compressor engine – 0.9 ton/month [10.6 

ton/yr] 

(F) For the T89-1 KW diesel compressor engine – 0.9 ton/month [10.6 

ton/yr]. 

(G) For the T89-2 KW diesel compressor engine – 0.9 ton/month [10.6 

ton/yr]. 

(2) Actual hours of operation method: The Permittee shall calculate NOx 

emissions from diesel engines by multiplying the actual hours of operation per 

calendar month for each diesel engine by the engine’s horsepower rating and by 

an NOx emission factor of 0.024 lb NOx/brake horsepower-hour for diesel 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 201 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

engines greater than 600 brake horse power and 0.031 lb NOx/brake 

horsepower-hour for diesel engines smaller than 600 brake horse power

(e) The Permittee shall calculate NOx emissions from the T174 Thermal Research 

Incinerator, in tons, each calendar month, by multiplying the actual hours of operation of 

the incinerator for each month by a NOx emission factor of 2.5 lb NOx/hour of operation. 

(f) The methods for determining monthly NOx emissions from the T49 Incinerator, the T149 

Incinerator, the RTOs, and the T79 Fume Incinerators are described in Condition F.1.5 of 

this permit. 

(g) NOx emissions from the T71 Pilot Plant are equivalent to the potential to emit for this 

facility – 0.1 ton/yr. 

(h) When determining actual annual emissions of NOx, the Permittee shall include emissions 

occurring as a result of startups, shutdown, and malfunctions. 

(i) The Permittee shall determine NOx emissions from boilers No. 6 and No. 7, in tons, each 

calendar month, using CEMS data from Condition D.20.16 and using the following 

method to determine NOx emission limits in Condition D.20.4: NOx emissions in lbs = lbs 

NOx/MMBTU * fuel usage( scf for natural gas, and gallons for fuel oil) * Heat content per 

unit of fuel used. A value of 1000 BTU/scf of natural gas shall be used if heat content 

data for the natural gas is unavailable. If data is not available for calculating the NOx 

emissions, the following substitution value shall be used: 32.0 lbs NOx/Hour. This value 

represents the maximum potential emissions of each boiler. 

G.1.5 Sulfur dioxides (SO2) emission limit determination [326 IAC 2-2.4-7(6) & (7)] [326 IAC 2-2.4-12] 

The Permittee shall determine actual annual emissions of SO2 by employing the following 

techniques: 

(a) The Permittee shall calculate SO2 emissions from Boilers 1, 2, and 3, in tons, each 

calendar month, by multiplying the amount of coal consumed in each calendar month by 

an SO2 emission factor of 38*S lb SO2/ton of coal burned, where S = the percent sulfur 

content of the coal as determined by Condition D.1.7. In addition, the Permittee shall 

calculate the SO2 emissions from burning natural gas in Boilers 1, 2, and 3, in tons, each 

calendar month, by multiplying the amount of natural gas burned in each calendar month 

by an SO2 emission factor of 0.6 lb SO2/million cubic feet of natural gas burned. 

 After the coal feed to Boilers No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3 is shutdown, starting September 14, 

2007, whichever comes first, the Permittee shall calculate, one hundred percent (100%) 

of the SO2 emissions from Boilers 1, 2, and 3, each calendar month, by multiplying the 

amount of natural gas burned in each calendar month by a SO2 emission factor of 0.6 lbs 

SO2 /million cubic feet of natural gas burned. 

(b) The Permittee shall calculate SO2 emissions from burning natural gas in Boilers 4 and 5, 

in tons, each calendar month, by multiplying the amount of natural gas burned in each 

calendar month by an SO2 emission factor of 0.6 lb SO2/million cubic feet of natural gas 

burned. 

(c) The Permittee shall calculate SO2 emissions from burning fuel oil in Boilers 4 and 5, in 

tons, each calendar month, by multiplying the amount of fuel oil burned in each calendar 

month by an SO2 emission factor of 69.6 lb SO2/1000 gallons of fuel oil burned. 

(d) The Permittee shall determine SO2 emissions from diesel engines, in tons, each calendar 

month, through one of the methods described in (1) and (2) below. The Permittee shall 

identify which method it used when it reports emissions pursuant to Condition G.1.8. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 202 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(1) Potential to emit method: The Permittee shall use the following values, which 

represent the SO2 potential to emit of the diesel engines, as the actual emissions: 

(A) For the T121 1250 KW diesel electrical generator – 0.25 ton/month [3.0 

ton/yr]. 

(B) For the T5 380 HP diesel emergency generator – 0.02 ton/month [0.2 

ton/yr] 

(C) For the T62 1100 KW diesel emergency generator – 0.1 ton/month [1.5 

ton/yr]. 

(D) For the T135 390 HP diesel emergency generator – 0.02 ton/month [0.2 

ton/yr]. 

(E) For the T78 58 KW diesel compressor engine – 0.06 ton/month [0.7 

ton/yr]. 

(F) For the T89-1 KW diesel compressor engine – 0.06 ton/month [0.7 

ton/yr]. 

(G) For the T89-2 KW diesel compressor engine – 0.06 ton/month [0.7 

ton/yr]. 

(2) Actual hours of operation method: The Permittee shall calculate SO2 emissions 

from diesel engines by multiplying the actual hours of operation per calendar 

month for each diesel engine by the engine’s horsepower rating and by an SO2

emission factor of 0.0004045 lb SO2/brake horsepower-hour for diesel engines 

greater than 600 brake horse power and 0.00205 lb SO2/brake horsepower-hour 

for diesel engines smaller than 600 brake horse power

(e) The Permittee shall calculate SO2 emissions from the T174 Thermal Research 

Incinerator, in tons, each calendar month, by multiplying the actual hours of operation of 

the incinerator for each month by a SO2 emission factor of 4.56 lb SO2/hour of operation. 

(f) The methods for determining monthly SO2 emissions from the T49 Incinerator, the T149 

Incinerator, the RTOs, and the T79 Fume Incinerators are described in Condition F.1.6 of 

this permit. 

(g) SO2 emissions from the T71 Pilot Plant are equivalent to the potential to emit for this 

facility – 1.5 ton/yr [0.125 ton/month]. 

(h) When determining actual annual emissions of SO2, the Permittee shall include emissions 

occurring as a result of startups, shutdown, and malfunctions. 

(i) The Permittee shall calculate SO2 emissions from burning natural gas in boilers No. 6 

and No. 7, in tons, each calendar month by multiplying the amount of natural gas burned 

in each calendar month by an SO2 emission factor of 0.6 lb SO2/million cubic feet of 

natural gas burned. 

(j) The Permittee shall calculate SO2 emissions from burning fuel oil in boilers No. 6 and No. 

7, in tons, each calendar month, by multiplying the amount of fuel oil burned in each 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 203 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

calendar month by an SO2 emission factor of 42.6 lb SO2/1000 gallons of fuel oil burned. 

G.1.6 Revalidation of emissions determination methods [326 IAC 2-2.4-12(i)] 

The Permittee shall revalidate the emissions determination methods described in Conditions 

G.1.4 and G.1.5 through performance testing or other scientifically valid means approved by the 

department no later than five years after the effective date of the PAL provisions. 

Record keeping and reporting [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-19] 

G.1.7 Record keeping requirements [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-2.4-13] 

(a) The Permittee shall retain a copy of all records necessary to determine compliance with 

the requirements of this G Section, including a determination of each emissions unit’s 

twelve (12) month rolling total emissions, for five years from the date of the record. 

(b) The Permittee shall retain a copy of the PAL permit application, any applications for 

revisions to the PAL, each annual compliance certification as required by Condition B.9 of 

this permit, and data relied on in the certification for the duration of the PAL plus five 

years. 

G.1.8 Reporting requirements [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-2.4-14] 

(a) The Permittee shall submit a semi-annual report, containing the information described 

below, to the address listed in Section C – General Reporting Requirements, within thirty 

(30) days after the end of the calendar quarter being reported. This report requires the 

certification by the “responsible official” as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). The report shall 

include the following information: 

(1) The identification of the owner and operator of the facility and the permit number. 

(2) Total emissions of NOx and SO2, in tons per rolling 12 month period for each 

month in the reporting period, as determined by Conditions G.1.4 and G.1.5. 

(3) All data relied upon, including but not limited to, any quality assurance or quality 

control data, in determining emissions. 

(4) A list of any emissions units modified or added to the major stationary source 

during the reporting period. 

(5) If not previously reported pursuant to another condition in this permit, the 

number, duration, and cause of any deviations or monitoring malfunctions, other 

than the time associated with zero and span calibration checks, and any 

corrective action taken. 

(6) If not required to be reported pursuant to another condition in this permit, 

information about monitoring system shutdowns including the following 

information: 

(A) Notification to the department of the shutdown of any monitoring system. 

(B) Whether the shutdown was permanent or temporary. 

(C) The reason for the shutdown. 

(D) The anticipated date that the monitoring system will be fully operational 

or replaced with another monitoring system. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 204 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

(E) Whether the emissions unit monitored by the monitoring system 

continued to operate. 

(F) If the emission unit monitored by the monitoring system continued to 

operate, the calculation of the: 

(i) Emissions of the pollutant; or 

(ii) Number determined by method included in the permit, as 

provided by 326 IAC 2-2.4-12(g). 

(b) The procedures for reporting deviations from the requirements of this Section G, and the 

procedures for reporting emissions in excess of the limits described in Condition G.1.1 

are described in Condition B.14. A report that describes emissions exceeding the PAL 

limits shall include the quantity of emissions emitted by the source. This term satisfies 

the requirements of 326 IAC 2-2.4-14(c). 

(c) The Permittee shall submit to the department the results of any revalidation test or 

method within three months of completion of the test or method. These results do not 

require responsible official certification. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 205 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY 

Section D.1 – Utilities Operations 

Quarterly Coal Characteristic and Consumption Report 

Source Name: Eli Lilly and Company, Tippecanoe Laboratories 

Source Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Mailing Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Part 70 Permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

Facility: Boilers 1, 2 and 3 

Parameter: SO2 emissions 

Limit: 6.0 lbs/MMBtu 

Quarter: _________________ Year: ______________ 

Month Sulfur Content 

(% Wt.) 

Heating Value 

(Btu/lb) 

Coal Consumption 

(tons) 

Emission Rate 

(lbs/MMBtu) 

 

Check one of the following: 

 No deviation occurred in this quarter. 

 The following deviation/s occurred in this quarter. 

Submitted by:__________________________________________________________________ 

Title / Position: _________________________________________________________________ 

Signature: ____________________________________________________________________ 

Date: ________________________________________________________________________ 

Phone: _______________________________________________________________________ 

Attach a signed certification to complete this report. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 206 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY 

Section D.1 – Utilities Operations 

Quarterly Fuel Oil Characteristic and Consumption Report 

Source Name: Eli Lilly and Company, Tippecanoe Laboratories 

Source Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Mailing Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Part 70 Permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

Facility: Boilers 4 and 5 

Parameter: SO2 emissions 

Limit: 0.5 lbs/MMBtu 

Quarter: _________________ Year: ______________ 

Month Sulfur Content 

(% Wt.) 

Heating Value 

(Btu/lb) 

Fuel Oil 

Consumption 

(gallons) 

Emission Rate 

(lbs/MMBtu) 

Boiler 4: 

 

Boiler 5: 

Check one of the following: 

 No deviation occurred in this quarter. 

 The following deviation/s occurred in this quarter. 

Submitted by:__________________________________________________________________ 

Title / Position: _________________________________________________________________ 

Signature: ____________________________________________________________________ 

Date: ________________________________________________________________________ 

Phone: _______________________________________________________________________ 

Attach a signed certification to complete this report. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 207 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY 

Section D.2 – Utilities Support Operations 

Quarterly Generator Hours Report 

Source Name: Eli Lilly and Company, Tippecanoe Laboratories 

Source Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Mailing Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Part 70 Permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

Facility: Generator T121 

Parameter: NOx Emissions 

Limit: T121 = 900 hrs of operation per 12 month period, rolled on a monthly basis 

Quarter: _________________ Year: ______________ 

Month Hours Used 

This Month 

Hours/ 

12 Months 

 

Check one of the following: 

 No deviation occurred in this quarter. 

 The following deviation/s occurred in this quarter. 

Submitted by:__________________________________________________________________ 

Title / Position: _________________________________________________________________ 

Signature: ____________________________________________________________________ 

Date: ________________________________________________________________________ 

Phone: _______________________________________________________________________ 

Attach a signed certification to complete this report. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 208 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY 

Section D.12-D.15 – Control Device CMS Operations 

Streamlined CMS Periodic Report 

Source Name: Eli Lilly and Company, Tippecanoe Laboratories 

Source Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Mailing Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Part 70 Permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

Quarter: _________________ Year: ______________ 

PART 1: CMS Exceedance Summary 

Regulated 

Entity CMS Brief Description Limits/UOM Manufacturer/Model # 

Last Audit/ Annual 

Calibration Date 

Description of 

changes in 

CMS/CEMS 

 

PART 2: CMS Downtime Summary 

Exceedance Time by Cause (days) 

Regulated 

Entity 

Operating 

Time (days) CMS 

Startup/ 

Shutdown 

Control 

Equipment 

Problem 

Process 

Problem 

Other known 

Other 

Unknown 

Total 

Exceedance 

Time (days) 

Exceedances 

(as % of 

Operating Time)

 

 

 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 209 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

PART 3: CMS Downtime Details, If Applicable 

Control Device: ______________________ 

CMS/CEMS: ______________________ 

Operating Time: ______________________ 

Start 

Date 

Start 

Time 

End 

Date 

End 

Time 

Downtime 

Type 

SSM 

(yes/no)

Nature and Cause of 

Malfunction 

Nature of Repairs or 

Adjustment/ Corrective 

Actions/ Preventive Measures

 

Control Device: ______________________ 

CMS/CEMS: ______________________ 

Operating Time: ______________________ 

Start 

Date 

Start 

Time 

End 

Date 

End 

Time 

Downtime 

Type 

SSM 

(yes/no)

Nature and Cause of 

Malfunction 

Nature of Repairs or 

Adjustment/ Corrective 

Actions/ Preventive Measures

 

Control Device: ______________________ 

CMS/CEMS: ______________________ 

Operating Time: ______________________ 

Start 

Date 

Start 

Time 

End 

Date 

End 

Time 

Downtime 

Type 

SSM 

(yes/no)

Nature and Cause of 

Malfunction 

Nature of Repairs or 

Adjustment/ Corrective 

Actions/ Preventive Measures

 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 210 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

PART 4: CMS Excursion Summary, If Applicable 

Regulated Entity Operating Time 

(days) CMS Number of Excursions % Excursion 

 

PART 5: CMS Excursion Details, If Applicable 

Control Device: ______________________ 

CMS/CEMS: ______________________ 

Operating Time: ______________________ 

Date Duration (days) 

 

 

 

 

PART 6: Bypass Summary 

Regulated Entity Date Start Time Building or Fume 

Stream Duration (hrs) SSM Event? 

 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 211 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

PART 7: SSM Summary 

REGULATED SOURCE DATE DURATION 

(hours) 

SSM EVENT 

TYPE 

SSM PLAN 

FOLLOWED? NOTES 

 

Submitted by:__________________________________________________________________ 

Title / Position: _________________________________________________________________ 

Signature: ____________________________________________________________________ 

Date: ________________________________________________________________________ 

Phone: _______________________________________________________________________ 

Attach a signed certification to complete this report. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 212 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY 

COMPLIANCE DATA SECTION 

Section E – Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) Program 

Streamlined LDAR Periodic Report 

Source Name: Eli Lilly and Company, Tippecanoe Laboratories 

Source Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Mailing Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Part 70 Permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

Period: _________________ Year: ______________ 

PART 1: LDAR Report for Process System Components 

Process Unit: 

Equipment Type: 

Service 

Monitoring Period Number 

Tested 

Number 

Leakers Percent Leakers Process Unit Shutdown 

Periods 

 

Number of 

Components Number Added Number Removed 

 

Process Unit: 

Equipment Type: 

Service 

Monitoring Period Number 

Tested 

Number 

Leakers Percent Leakers Process Unit Shutdown 

Periods 

 

Number of 

Components Number Added Number Removed 

 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 213 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

PART 2: LDAR Report for Waste Components 

Process Unit: 

Equipment Type: 

Service 

Monitoring Period Number 

Tested 

Number 

Leakers Percent Leakers Process Unit Shutdown 

Periods 

 

Number of 

Components Number Added Number Removed 

 

Process Unit: 

Equipment Type: 

Service 

Monitoring Period Number 

Tested 

Number 

Leakers Percent Leakers Process Unit Shutdown 

Periods 

 

Number of 

Components Number Added Number Removed 

 

Submitted by:__________________________________________________________________ 

Title / Position: _________________________________________________________________ 

Signature: ____________________________________________________________________ 

Date: ________________________________________________________________________ 

Phone: _______________________________________________________________________ 

Attach a signed certification to complete this report. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 214 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY 

COMPLIANCE DATA SECTION 

PART 70 OPERATING PERMIT 

SEMI-ANNUAL BOILERS NO. 6 and NO. 7 CERTIFICATION 

Source Name: Eli Lilly and Company, Tippecanoe Laboratories 

Source Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Mailing Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Part 70 Permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

Facility: Boilers No. 6 and No.7 

 Natural Gas 

 Very Low Sulfur Oil 

From: To: 

I certify that, based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements and 

information in the document are true, accurate, and complete. 

Signature: 

Printed Name: 

Title/Position: 

Phone: 

Date: 

A certification by the responsible official as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34) is required for this report. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 215 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY 

COMPLIANCE DATA SECTION 

Part 70 Quarterly Report 

Source Name: Eli Lilly and Company, Tippecanoe Laboratories 

Source Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Mailing Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Part 70 Permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

Facility: Boilers No. 6 and No.7 

Parameter: CO 

Limit: 98 tons/12 months 

Quarter:________________ YEAR:__________ 

Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 + Column 2 

Month 

This Month Previous 11 Months 12 Month Total 

Month 1 

Month 2 

Month 3 

 No deviation occurred in this quarter. 

 Deviation/s occurred in this quarter. 

 Deviation has been reported on:_____________________________ 

Submitted by:______________________________________________ 

Title / Position: _____________________________________________ 

Signature:_________________________________________________ 

Date: ____________________________________________________ 

Phone: ___________________________________________________ 

Attach a signed certification to complete this report. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 216 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY 

COMPLIANCE DATA SECTION 

Part 70 Quarterly Report 

for First 12 months of Operation 

Source Name: Eli Lilly and Company, Tippecanoe Laboratories 

Source Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Mailing Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Part 70 Permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

Facility: Boilers No. 6 and No.7 

Parameter: CO 

Limits: (1) 98 ton/12 months 

(2) Running Monthly Average: 8.17 tons 

Quarter:________________ YEAR:__________ 

 Column 1 Column 2 

Column 1 

+ 

Column 2 

 (Column 1 + Column 2) .

(Total Months of Operation) 

Month This 

Month 

Previous 

11 Months 

*Total Months 

of Operation 

Running average 

up to current month 

Month 1 

Month 2 

Month 3 

* When determining the total usage for previous 11 months, assume zero usage during the 

 months when the boilers were not in operation. 

 No deviation occurred in this quarter. 

 Deviation/s occurred in this quarter. 

 Deviation has been reported on:_____________________________ 

Submitted by:______________________________________________ 

Title / Position: _____________________________________________ 

Signature:_________________________________________________ 

Date: ____________________________________________________ 

Phone: ___________________________________________________ 

Attach a signed certification to complete this report. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 217 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY 

COMPLIANCE DATA SECTION 

Part 70 Quarterly Report 

Source Name: Eli Lilly and Company, Tippecanoe Laboratories 

Source Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Mailing Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Part 70 Permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

Facility: Boiler No.6 

Parameter: Very low sulfur oil and hours fuel oil burned 

Limit: Less than 976,740 gallons/year = < 10% annual capacity for fuel oil 

Quarter:________________ YEAR:__________ 

Column 1 

This Quarter 

Column 2 

Year Total 

Column 3 

(Column 1 + 

Column 2) 

Quarter Year Total 

No. of 

gallons 

No. of 

hours 

No. of 

gallons 

No. of 

hours 

No. of 

gallons 

No. of 

hours 

Annual Capacity 

for fuel oil 

Quarter 1 

January-March 0.0 0.0 

 

Quarter 2 

April-June 

 

Quarter 3 

July-September 

 

Quarter 4 

OctoberDecember 

 

 

The boiler‘s maximum capacity to burn fuel oil is 9,767,400 gallons. 

Annual Capacity = No. of gallons of fuel oil burned up to date for the year /9,767,400 gallons 

 No deviation occurred in this quarter. 

 Deviation/s occurred in this quarter. 

 Deviation has been reported on:_____________________________ 

Submitted by:______________________________________________ 

Title / Position: _____________________________________________ 

Signature:_________________________________________________ 

Date: ____________________________________________________ 

Phone: ___________________________________________________ 

Attach a signed certification to complete this report. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 218 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY 

COMPLIANCE DATA SECTION 

Part 70 Quarterly Report 

Source Name: Eli Lilly and Company, Tippecanoe Laboratories 

Source Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Mailing Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Part 70 Permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

Facility: Boiler No. 7 

Parameter: Very low sulfur oil and hours fuel oil burned 

Limit: Less than 976,740 gallons/year = < 10% annual capacity for fuel oil 

Quarter:________________ YEAR:__________ 

Column 1 

This Quarter 

Column 2 

Year Total 

Column 3 

(Column 1 + 

Column 2) 

Quarter Year Total 

No. of 

gallons 

No. of 

hours 

No. of 

gallons 

No. of 

hours 

No. of 

gallons 

No. of 

hours 

Annual Capacity 

Quarter 1 

January-March 0.0 0.0 

 

Quarter 2 

April-June 

 

Quarter 3 

July-September 

 

Quarter 4 

OctoberDecember 

 

 

The boiler‘s maximum capacity to burn fuel oil is 9,767,400 gallons. 

Annual Capacity = No. of gallons of fuel oil burned up to date for the year /9,767,400 gallons 

 No deviation occurred in this quarter. 

 Deviation/s occurred in this quarter. 

 Deviation has been reported on:_____________________________ 

Submitted by:______________________________________________ 

Title / Position: _____________________________________________ 

Signature:_________________________________________________ 

Date: ____________________________________________________ 

Phone: ___________________________________________________ 

Attach a signed certification to complete this report. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 219 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY 

COMPLIANCE DATA SECTION 

Part 70 Annual Report 

Source Name: Eli Lilly and Company, Tippecanoe Laboratories 

Source Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Mailing Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Part 70 Permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

Facility: Emergency Air Compressor (T26-COMP 5600A) 

Parameter: Hour of operation 

Limit: 500 Hours/year 

YEAR: _____________ 

Hours of Operation 

 No deviation occurred in quarter. 

 Deviation/s occurred in this quarter. 

 Deviation has been reported on:_____________________________ 

Submitted by:______________________________________________ 

Title / Position: _____________________________________________ 

Signature:_________________________________________________ 

Date: ____________________________________________________ 

Phone: ___________________________________________________ 

Attach a signed certification to complete this report. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 220 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY 

COMPLIANCE BRANCH 

100 North Senate Avenue 

P.O. Box 6015 

Indianapolis, Indiana 46206-6015 

Phone: 317-233-0178 

Fax: 317-233-6865 

PART 70 OPERATING PERMIT 

EMERGENCY OCCURRENCE REPORT 

Source Name: Eli Lilly and Company, Tippecanoe Laboratories 

Source Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Mailing Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Part 70 Permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

This form consists of 2 pages 

 This is an emergency as defined in 326 IAC 2-7-1(12) 

• The Permittee must notify the Office of Air Quality (OAQ), within four (4) business hours (1-

800-451-6027 or 317-233-0178, ask for Compliance Section); and 

• The Permittee must submit notice in writing or by facsimile within two (2) working days 

(Facsimile Number: 317-233-6865), and follow the other requirements of 326 IAC 2-7-16. 

If any of the following are not applicable, mark N/A 

Facility/Equipment/Operation: 

Control Equipment: 

Permit Condition or Operation Limitation in Permit: 

Description of the Emergency: 

Describe the cause of the Emergency: 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 221 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

If any of the following are not applicable, mark N/A 

Date/Time Emergency started: 

Date/Time Emergency was corrected: 

Was the facility being properly operated at the time of the emergency? Y N 

Describe: 

Type of Pollutants Emitted: TSP, PM-10, SO2, VOC, NOX, CO, Pb, other: 

Estimated amount of pollutant(s) emitted during emergency: 

Describe the steps taken to mitigate the problem: 

Describe the corrective actions/response steps taken: 

Describe the measures taken to minimize emissions: 

If applicable, describe the reasons why continued operation of the facilities are necessary to prevent 

imminent injury to persons, severe damage to equipment, substantial loss of capital investment, or loss 

of product or raw materials of substantial economic value: 

Form Completed by: ____________________________________________________________ 

Title / Position: ________________________________________________________________ 

Date: ________________________________________________________________________ 

Phone: ______________________________________________________________________ 

A certification is not required for this report.
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 222 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY 

COMPLIANCE DATA SECTION 

PART 70 OPERATING PERMIT 

QUARTERLY DEVIATION AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT

Source Name: Eli Lilly and Company, Tippecanoe Laboratories 

Source Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Mailing Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Part 70 Permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

Months: ___________ to ____________ Year: ______________ 

Permit Requirement (specify permit condition #) 

Date of Deviation: Duration of Deviation: 

Number of Deviations: 

Probable Cause of Deviation: 

Response Steps Taken: 

Permit Requirement (specify permit condition #) 

Date of Deviation: Duration of Deviation: 

Number of Deviations: 

Probable Cause of Deviation: 

Response Steps Taken: 

Permit Requirement (specify permit condition #) 

Date of Deviation: Duration of Deviation: 

Number of Deviations: 

Probable Cause of Deviation: 

Response Steps Taken: 

Form Completed by: ____________________________________________________________ 

Title / Position: ________________________________________________________________ 

Date: ________________________________________________________________________ 

Phone: ______________________________________________________________________ 

Attach a signed certification to complete this report. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 223 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY 

PART 70 OPERATING PERMIT 

CERTIFICATION 

Source Name: Eli Lilly and Company, Tippecanoe Laboratories 

Source Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Mailing Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Part 70 Permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

This certification shall be included when submitting monitoring, testing reports/results 

or other documents as required by this permit.

 Please check what document is being certified: 

 Annual Compliance Certification Letter 

 Test Result (specify)_________________________________________________________ 

 Report (specify) ____________________________________________________________ 

 Notification (specify) ________________________________________________________ 

 Affidavit (specify) ___________________________________________________________ 

 Other (specify) _____________________________________________________________ 

I certify that, based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements and 

information in the document are true, accurate, and complete. 

Signature: 

Printed Name: 

Title/Position: 

Phone: 

Date: 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 224 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY 

Sections F.1 and G.1 – Change Management and Flexible Permit Requirements, 

and Plantwide Applicability Limitations Requirements 

Quarterly Emission Limit Report 

Source Name: Eli Lilly and Company, Tippecanoe Laboratories 

Source Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Mailing Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Part 70 Permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

Facility: BPM Operations (RTOs, T79, T49, T149, Chemical WWTP, BPM Building 

Fugitives) 

Parameter: BPM Operations Emission Limit for VOC, CO, NOx, SO2, and Fluorides; 

T79 Fume Incinerator System Emission Sublimit for VOC 

Limit: 

Pollutant BPM Operations 

(tons/yr) 

T79 Fume Incinerator 

(tons/yr) 

VOC 300 300 

CO 150 30 

NOx 300 30 

SO2 300 5 

Fluorides 6 2 

Facility: Source wide 

Parameter: Plantwide Emission Limits for NOx, and SO2; 

PAL Limit: 

Pollutant (Tons/yr) 

NOx 648 

SO2 2,059 

The attached spreadsheet provides the monthly actual emissions for the BPM operations and PAL NOx 

and SO2 limits. The information is used to determine compliance with the emission limits provided above. 

This emission summary report was: 

Submitted by:__________________________________________________________________ 

Title / Position: _________________________________________________________________ 

Signature: ____________________________________________________________________ 

Date: ________________________________________________________________________ 

Phone: _______________________________________________________________________ 

Attach a signed certification to complete this report. 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 225 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Source Name: Eli Lilly and Company, Tippecanoe Laboratories Source Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 Mailing Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 Part 70 Permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

Actual Emission Estimates, tons Quarter: Year: 

Pollutant Month 1 Previous 11 Months 12-month Total Month 2 Previous 11 Months 12-month Total Month 3 Prev

M

RTOs 

 VOC, Point 

 CO 

 NOx  SO2 Fluorides 

T79 Fume Incinerator System 

 VOC, Point 

 CO  NOx  SO2 Fluorides T49 Liquid Waste Incinerator 

 VOC, Point  CO  NOx  SO2 Fluorides 

T149 Solid-Liquid Waste Incinerator 

 VOC, Point  CO  NOx  SO2 Fluorides 

Chemical Wastewater Treatment Plant Operations 

 VOC, Point 

BPM Building Operations 

VOC, Fugitive 

BPM Total 

 VOC (Point+ Fugitive) 

 CO  NOx 
Eli Lilly and Company-Tippecanoe Labs 4th Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006 Page 226 of 226 

Lafayette, Indiana Modified by: Aida De Guzman OP No. T157-6879-00006 Permit Reviewer: Dr. Trip Sinha 

Actual Emission Estimates, tons Quarter: Year: 

Pollutant Month 1 Previous 11 Months 12-month Total Month 2 Previous 11 Months 12-month Total Month 3 Prev

M

SO2

 Fluorides Boilers  NOx  SO2Foul Air Incinerator  NOx  SO2Reciprocating Engines  NOx  SO2Site Total PAL Limits  NOx  SO2

Submitted by: _________________________________________________________________ Title / Position: ________________________________________________________________ Signature: ____________________________________________________________________ Date: ________________________________________________________________________ Phone:_______________________________________________________________________ 

Attach a signed certification to complete this report. 
Indiana Department of Environmental Management

Office of Air Quality

Technical Support Document (TSD) 

for a Part 70 Significant Permit Modification 

Source Description and Location 

Source Name: Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories 

Source Location: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, IN, 47909 

County: Tippecanoe 

SIC Code: 2833 and 2834 

Operation Permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

Operation Permit Issuance Date: February 27, 2004 

Significant Permit Modification No.: SPM 157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

Existing Approvals 

The source was issued a Part 70 Operating Permit T157-6879-00006 on February 27, 2004. The 

source has since received the following: 

(a) Significant Permit Modification No.: 157-20216-00006, issued on January 19, 2005; 

(b) Significant Permit Modification No.: 157-20878-00006, issued on March 15, 2005; 

(c) Administrative Amendment No.: 157-20003-00006, issued on April 1, 2005; 

(d) Administrative Amendment No.: 157-21143-00006, issued on May 11, 2005; 

(e) Significant Permit Modification No.: 157-20732-00006, issued on August 15, 2005; and 

(f) Significant Permit Modification and PAL Permit No.: 157-21811-00006, issued on May 9, 

2006. 

County Attainment Status 

The source is located in Tippecanoe County. 

Pollutant Status

PM10 Attainment 

PM2.5 Attainment 

SO2 Attainment

NO2 Attainment

8-hour Ozone Attainment

CO Attainment

Lead Attainment

(a) Volatile organic compounds (VOC) and Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) are regulated under the 

Clean Air Act (CAA) for the purposes of attaining and maintaining the National Ambient 

Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone. Therefore, VOC and NOx emissions are 

considered when evaluating the rule applicability relating to ozone. Tippecanoe County 

has been designated as attainment or unclassifiable for ozone. Therefore, VOC and NOx 

emissions were reviewed pursuant to the requirements for Prevention of Significant 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 2 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

Deterioration (PSD), 326 IAC 2-2. 

(b) Tippecanoe County has been classified as attainment for PM2.5. U.S. EPA has not yet 

established the requirements for Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD), 326 IAC 2-

2 for PM2.5 emissions. Therefore, until the U.S.EPA adopts specific provisions for PSD 

review for PM2.5 emissions, it has directed states to regulate PM10 emissions as a 

surrogate for PM2.5 emissions. 

(c) Tippecanoe County has been classified as attainment or unclassifiable for CO, lead, NO2, 

PM10, and SO2. Therefore, these emissions were reviewed pursuant to the requirements 

for Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD), 326 IAC 2-2. 

(d) Since this source is classified as a chemical process plant, it is considered one of the 

twenty-eight (28) listed source categories, as specified in 326 IAC 2-2-1(gg)(1). 

(e) Fugitive Emissions 

Since this type of operation is one of the twenty-eight (28) listed source categories under 

326 IAC 2-2, fugitive emissions are counted toward the determination of PSD applicability. 

Source Status 

The table below summarizes the potential to emit of the entire source, prior to the proposed 

modification, after consideration of all enforceable limits established in the effective permits: 

Pollutant Emissions (tons/year) 

PM >100 

PM10 >100 

SO2 >100 

VOC >100 

CO >100 

NOx >100 

(a) This existing source is a major stationary source, under PSD (326 IAC 2-2), because a 

regulated pollutant is emitted at a rate of 100 tons per year or more, and it is one of the 

twenty-eight (28) listed source categories, as specified in 326 IAC 2-2-1(gg)(1). 

(b) These emissions are based upon 2003 OAQ emission data submitted by Eli Lilly and 

Company. 

The table below summarizes the potential to emit HAPs for the entire source, prior to the 

proposed modification, after consideration of all enforceable limits established in the effective 

permits: 

HAPs Potential To Emit (tons/year) 

Single HAP >10 

Total HAPs >25 

This existing source is a major source of HAPs, as defined in 40 CFR 63.41, because HAP 

emissions are greater than twenty-five (25) tons per year for a combination of HAPs. Therefore, 

this source is a major source under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 3 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

Actual Emissions 

The following table shows the actual emissions from the source. This information reflects the 2003 

OAQ emission data. 

Pollutant Actual Emissions (tons/year) 

PM10 394 

SO2 1,123 

VOC 111 

CO 155 

NOx 349 

HAP Actual Emissions (tons/year)

METHANOL 11.9 

CHLOROFORM 1.01 

N,NDIMETHYLFORMAMIDE 0.255 

ACETONITRILE 2.77 

DICHLOROMETHANE 

(METHYLENE CHLORIDE) 9.7 

ACETOPHENONE 0.13 

BENZOYL CHLORIDE 0.503 

1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 

(ETHYLENE DICHLORIDE) 0.255 

ETHYLENE GLYCOL 5.65 

TOLUENE 3.71 

PHENOL 0.005 

N-HEXANE 44.4 

TRIETHYLAMINE 0.466 

N-METHYL-2-

PYRROLIDONE 0.255 

MERCURY 0.007 

HYDROCHLORIC ACID 

(1995 AND AFTER "ACID 

AEROSOLS" ONLY) 

10.98 

AMMONIA 2.25 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 4 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

Pollutant Actual Emissions (tons/year) 

SULFURIC ACID (1994 

AND AFTER "ACID 

AEROSOLS" ONLY) 

12.6 

CHLORINE 0.503 

GLYCOL ETHERS 0.75 

LEAD COMPOUNDS 0.013 

DIOXIN AND DIOXIN-LIKE 

COMPOUNDS Neg. 

Background and Description of Proposed Modification 

The Office of Air Quality (OAQ) has reviewed a modification application, submitted by Eli Lilly and 

Company on September 19, 2005, relating to the modification of the issued Part 70 Permit No. 

157-6879-00006, issued on February 27, 2004, to include the following: 

(a) Incorporation of the applicable requirements including COM alternative Monitoring 

determined in Significant Source Modification No.: 157-21809-00006, issued on June 7, 

2006, for the two new natural gas and very low sulfur oil (as defined in 40 CFR 60.41b) 

fired boilers, one natural gas emergency generator and one diesel emergency 

compressor. The following is the list of the emissions units: 

Emissions 

Unit ID 

Emissions Unit 

Description Stack/Vent Nominal 

Capacity UOM Control 

Device 

Building T26: 

BLR006 Natural Gas/Fuel Oil 

Boiler No. 6 

S-T26-

BLR006 156.1 MMBtu/hr None 

BLR007 Natural Gas/Fuel Oil 

Boiler No. 7 

S-T26-

BLR007 156.1 MMBtu/hr None 

T26-GEN7500A Natural Gas Powered 

Emergency Generator 

S-T26- GEN7500A 125 KW None 

T26-COMP 

5600A 

Diesel Powered 

Emergency Air 

Compressor 

S-T26- COMP 

5600A 125 Hp None 

(b) Incorporation of the Alternative Monitoring Plan (AMP), approved by US EPA on January 

27, 2006 in lieu of the existing Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) for the 

T149 rotary kiln incinerator; and 

(c) Request changes to existing sections and conditions of the Part 70 permit, as detailed in 

the Changes to the Part 70 section of this TSD. 

Enforcement Issue 

There are no enforcement actions pending. 

Permit Level Determination – Part 70

This modification is subject to 326 IAC 2-7-12(d), Significant Permit Modification, since it involves 

incorporating applicable requirements for emission units permitted in Significant Source 

Modification No. 157-21809-0006, issued on June 7, 2006, and a request for significant changes 

to existing monitoring Part 70 terms or conditions that do not qualify as minor permit modification 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 5 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

or as an administrative amendment. 

Federal Rule Applicability Determination 

There are no additional federal rules that will be applicable to the source as a result of this permit 

modification. 

State Rule Applicability Determination

There are no additional state rules that will be applicable to the source as a result of this permit 

modification. 

Changes to the Part 70 Permit 

The changes listed below have been made to the Part 70 Operating Permit No. 157-6879-00006, 

issued on February 27, 2004. Deleted language appears as strikethroughs and new language 

appears in bold: 

(1) Starting September 13, 2007, Coal/Natural Gas Boilers No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3, found in 

SECTION A.2(a) and SECTION D.1 will no longer be using coal. These boilers including 

Natural Gas/Fuel Oil Boilers No. 4, and No. 5 will be moved to SECTION D.20, and 

SECTION D.20 will supersede SECTION D.1. Therefore, SECTION A.2(a) and 

SECTION D.20 have been changed as follows: 

A.2 Emission Units and Pollution Control Equipment Summary [326 IAC 2-7-4(c)(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-

5(15)] 

This stationary source consists of the following emission units and pollution control devices: 

(a) D.1 Utilities Operations: The utilities operations consist of three coal/natural gas-fired boilers 

equipped with an ash handling system and supported by a coal pile and coal conveyor 

system, and two natural gas boilers with fuel oil backup supplied by one fuel oil tank. The 

boilers provide steam to process operations in bulk pharmaceutical manufacturing and 

fermented products. The detailed equipment list is located in Section D.1 of this permit. 

Section D.1 will be superseded by Section D.20 starting September 13, 2007. This is 

the compliance date of 40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD (Boiler MACT). At this time, the 

coal feed to Boilers No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3 will be shut off, and these boilers will burn 

100% natural gas. 

SECTION D.1 UTILITIES OPERATION CONDITIONS

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The information describing the processes contained in the following facility description boxes is descriptive 

information and does not constitute enforceable conditions: 

This section will no longer be in effect when all of the coal chutes to Boilers No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3 are 

disconnected, starting September 13, 2007. 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 6 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

(a) The following emission units are subject to applicable requirements described in this D section: 

Emission* 

Unit ID Emission Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity UOM Control Device 

Building T6: 

 BLR001 Coal/Natural Gas Boiler S-T6-BLR001 92 MMBtu/hr Multiclone001 

 BLR002 Coal/Natural Gas Boiler S-T6-BLR002 92 MMBtu/hr Multiclone002 

 BLR003 Coal/Natural Gas Boiler S-T6-BLR003 92 MMBtu/hr Multiclone003 

 BLR004 Natural Gas/Fuel Oil Boiler S-T6-BLR004 142 MMBtu/hr None 

 BLR005 Natural Gas/Fuel Oil Boiler S-T6-BLR005 97 MMBtu/hr None 

CONASH Ash Handling System PV-T6-

CONASH 1805 lbs/hr Baghouse 

* In this permit, boilers BLR001, BLR002, BLR003, BLR004, and BLR005 are referred to as Boilers 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, 

respectively. 

(b) The following emission units are not subject to applicable requirements described in this D section 

and are listed only for informational purposes: 

Emission 

Unit ID Emission Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity UOM Control Device 

Outside Building T6: 

OILTK001* Fuel Oil Storage Tank PV-T6-

OILTK001 250,000 gallons None 

COAL Coal Pile N/A N/A N/A N/A 

CNV001-

CNV005 

Covered Coal Conveyor 

System N/A N/A N/A N/A 

• Emission units marked with a single asterisk are insignificant activities as defined in 326 IAC 2-7-1(21). Specifically, 

the fuel oil storage tank is an insignificant activity pursuant to 326 IAC 2-7-1(21)(A)-(C). 

Condition D.1.0 has been added in SECTION D.1 as follows: 

D.1.0 SECTION D.1 Requirements Supersession 

The requirements of this SECTION D.1 shall be superseded by SECTION D.20 and 

therefore, shall no longer be in effect starting September 13, 2007. 

(2) Condition D.1.1 has been incorporated in Condition D.20.5 for Boilers 1, 2, and 3, which 

will take effect starting September 13, 2007. The heat input rating of the natural gas 

burners for each of boilers no.1, no.2, and no.3 are less than the heat input rating for 

burning coal, 92 MMBtu/hr rating was changed to 50 MMBtu/hr. 

The PM limit of 0.56 lb/MMBtu based on the source’s total heat input capacity (Q), of 276 

MMBtu/hr is now 0.88 lb/MMBtu based on Q of 150 MMBtu/hr. However, Eli Lilly, chose to 

keep the current PM limit, which is lower. 

3 (92 MMBtu/hr) = 276 MMBtu/hr 

3 (50 MMBtu/hr)) = 150 MMBtu/hr 

See Condition D.20.5 for the changes made. 

(3) Rule 326 IAC 7-1 in Condition D.1.2 only applies to facilities, burning coal, distillate oil, 

and residual oil. This condition was incorporated in Condition D.20.3 for Boilers 4 and 5 

only, which will take effect starting September 13, 2007. See Condition D.20.3 below for 

the changes made. 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 7 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

(4) Condition D.1.8 requirements are for Boilers 4 and 5 which do not combust coal. 

However, these boilers will be moved to SECTION D.20 at the same time Boilers 1, 2 and 

3 will cease using coal. This condition was incorporated in Condition D.20.13, which will 

take effect starting September 13, 2007. See Condition D.20.13 below for the changes 

made. 

(5) Condition D.1.13 requirements are for Boilers 4 and 5 which do not combust coal. 

However, these boilers will be moved to SECTION D.20 at the same time Boilers 1, 2 and 

3 will cease using coal. This condition was incorporated in Condition D.20.17, which will 

take effect starting September 13, 2007. See Condition D.20.17 below for the changes 

made. 

(6) Condition D.1.16, D.1.17(a), and D.1.18 are applicable to Boilers 1, 2 and 3 when 

combusting coal. These conditions will no longer be applicable starting September 13, 

2007, since these boilers will cease using coal for fuel. Condition D.1.18 was incorporated 

in Condition D.20.18, which will take effect starting September 13, 2007. See Condition 

D.20.18 below for the changes made. 

(7) The following SECTION D.20 has been added to the Part 70 permit to incorporate the 

applicable requirements for Natural Gas/Fuel Oil Boilers No.6 and No.7, generator (T26-

GEN-7500A), and compressor (T26-COMP-5600A), permitted in Significant Source 

Modification 157-21809-0006. SECTION D.20 will also incorporate requirements for 

Boilers 1, 2, 3 and Natural Gas/Fuel Oil Boilers BLR004, and BLR005, which would be 

effective starting September 13, 2007 when using coal for fuel will be discontinued. 

The emergency generator T26-GEN-7500A (insignificant activity), heat input rating has 

been changed from 125 KW to 150 KW, in administrative amendment 157-21143-00006, 

issued on May 11, 2005. This change did not get included in the last permit modification. 

SECTION D.20 FACILITY OPERATION CONDITIONS 

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The information describing the processes contained in the following facility description boxes is descriptive 

information and does not constitute enforceable conditions: 

(a) The following emissions units are subject to applicable requirements described in this D 

section: 

Emissions 

Unit ID 

Emissions Unit 

Description Stack/Vent Nominal 

Capacity UOM Control 

Device 

Building T6 

BLR001 Natural Gas Boiler No. 1 S-T6-BLR001 50 MMBtu/hr None 

BLR002 Natural Gas Boiler No. 2 S-T6-BLR002 50 MMBtu/hr None

BLR003 Natural Gas Boiler No. 3 S-T6-BLR003 50 MMBtu/hr None

BLR004 Natural Gas/Fuel Oil 

Boiler No. 4 S-T6-BLR004 142 MMBtu/hr None

BLR005 Natural Gas/Fuel Oil 

Boiler No. 5 S-T6-BLR005 97 MMBtu/hr None

Building T26

BLR006 Natural Gas/Fuel Oil 

Boiler No. 6 

S-T26-

BLR006 156.1 MMBtu/hr None 

BLR007 Natural Gas/Fuel Oil 

Boiler No. 7 

S-T26-

BLR007 156.1 MMBtu/hr None 

T26-GEN7500A Natural Powered 

Emergency Generator 

S-T26- GEN7500A 150 KW None 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 8 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

T26-COMP 

5600A 

Diesel Powered 

Emergency Air 

Compressor 

S-T26- COMP 

5600A 125 Hp None 

* Emission units marked with a single asterisk are insignificant activities as defined in 326 IAC 2-7-1(21). 

 (b) The following emission units are not subject to applicable requirements described 

in this D section and are listed only for informational purposes: 

 Emission 

Unit ID 

Emission Unit 

Description Stack/Vent Nominal 

Capacity UOM Control 

Device 

Outside Building T6: 

OILTK001* Fuel Oil Storage Tank PV-T6-

OILTK001 250,000 gallons None 

* Emission units marked with a single asterisk are insignificant activities as defined in326 IAC 2-7-1(21). 

Specifically, the fuel oil storage tank is an insignificant activity pursuant to 326 IAC 2-7-1(21)(A)-(C). 

Emission Limitations and Standards [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.20.0 Natural Gas Fuel Usage 

 

Boilers No.1, No. 2, and No. 3 shall burn only natural gas on and after September 13, 2007. 

D.20.1 General Provisions Relating to NSPS and NESHAP [326 IAC 12-1] [40 CFR 60, Subpart A] 

[40 CFR 63, Subpart A] [326 IAC 20-1] 

(a) The provisions of 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart A - General Provisions, which are 

incorporated by reference in 326 IAC 12-1, apply to Boilers No. 6 and No.7 

described in this section except when otherwise specified in 40 CFR Part 60, 

Subpart Db. 

(b) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.7505, the Permittee shall comply with the provisions of 40 

CFR Part 63, Subpart A – General Provisions, which are incorporated by reference 

as 326 IAC 20-1-1, for Boilers No. 6 and No.7, as specified in Appendix A of 40 CFR 

Part 63, Subpart DDDDD in accordance with the schedule in 40 CFR 63, Subpart 

DDDDD. 

D.20.2 Opacity Limitations [326 IAC 5] [40 CFR 60.43b] [326 IAC 12] [326 IAC 2-7-24] 

(a) Notwithstanding Condition C.2, pursuant to 326 IAC 12 the opacity from Boilers No. 

6 and No.7 shall not exceed 20% for any 6-minute block period, except for one 6-

minute period per hour of not more than 27 percent opacity. Pursuant to 326 IAC 

12, the opacity limit does not apply during periods of startups, shutdowns, or 

malfunctions. However, the general opacity requirements of Condition C.2 apply at 

all times. This condition expires when the revisions made to 40 CFR 60 Subpart Db, 

as amended on February 27, 2006, become effective as Indiana law. This condition 

is not federally enforceable. 

(b) When starting up or shutting down Boilers No. 6 and No.7, opacity may exceed the 

applicable limit in Condition C.2. However, opacity levels shall not exceed sixty 

percent (60%) for any six (6)-minute averaging period. Opacity in excess of the 

applicable limit established in 326 IAC 5-1-2 shall not continue for more than two 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 9 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

(2) six (6)-minute averaging periods in any twenty-four (24) hour period. 

(c) Pursuant to 40 CFR 60.43b(h)(5), because Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 will burn only 

very low sulfur oil or natural gas, the boilers are not subject to opacity limitations in 

40 CFR 60.43b(f) and (g). 

D.20.3 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Limitations [326 IAC 7-1.1-2] [40 CFR 60.41b] [40 CFR 60.42b(k)] 

[326 IAC 12] [326 IAC 2-7-24] 

(a) Pursuant to 326 IAC 7-1.1 (SO2 Emission Limitations), 326 IAC 12, and 40 CFR 60, 

Subpart Db (Standards of Performance for Industrial-Commercial-Institutional 

Steam Generating Units): 

(1) The SO2 emission rate from Boilers No. 6 and No.7 shall not exceed 0.32 

pounds per million Btu heat input; or 

(2) The fuel oil shall contain no more than 0.3 weight percent sulfur. 

(3) If the Permittee burns either natural gas or very low sulfur oil, the Permittee 

shall be in compliance with Conditions D.20.3(a)(1) and (2). 

(b) Pursuant to 40 CFR 60 Subpart Db, the fuel oil sulfur content or sulfur dioxide 

emission limit applies at all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and 

malfunction. 

(c) Pursuant to 326 IAC 7-1.1-2 (Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations), the SO2

emissions from Boilers No. 4 and No. 5 shall not exceed 0.5 lb/MMBtu of heat input 

when burning No. 2 fuel oil. Pursuant to 326 IAC 7-2-1, compliance with this 

standard is based on a calendar month average. This emission limit correlates to a 

maximum fuel sulfur content of 0.49 percent by weight. 

On and after September 13, 2007, section (c) of this Condition D.20.3 shall apply. 

D.20.4 Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Limitations [40 CFR 60.44b] [326 IAC 12] 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 60.44b(a), the NOx emission rate from Boilers No. 6 and No.7 shall not 

exceed 0.2 lb per MMBtu per boiler. The NOx emission limit shall be based on a 30-day 

rolling average. The NOx emission limit applies at all times, including periods of startup, 

shutdown, and malfunction. 

D.20.5 Particulate Matter (PM) Limitations [40 CFR 63.7505] [40 CFR Subpart DDDDD, Table 1] 

 326 IAC 20-1] [326 IAC 6-2-3] [326 IAC 2-7-24] 

(a) Pursuant to 326 IAC 6-2-3(b) (Particulate Matter Emission Limitations for Sources of 

Indirect Heating), particulate emissions from each natural gas-fired boiler (Boilers 

No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3) shall not exceed 0.56 pounds per million British thermal 

units (MMBtu) heat input. 

(b) Pursuant to 326 IAC 6-2-3(c) (Particulate Matter Emission Limitations for Sources of 

Indirect Heating), particulate emissions from Boiler No. 4 shall not exceed 0.39 

pounds per MMBtu heat input. 

(c) Pursuant to 326 IAC 6-2-3(c) (Particulate Matter Emission Limitations for Sources of 

Indirect Heating), particulate emissions from Boiler No. 5 shall not exceed 0.31 

pounds per MMBtu heat input. 

(d) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD, Table 1, and 326 IAC 6-2-4(a), the PM 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 10 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

emission rate from each of Boilers No. 6 and No.7 shall not exceed 0.03 pounds per 

MMBtu heat input. The particulate matter emission limit applies at all times except 

during periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction. 

On and after September 13, 2007, sections (a) through (c) of this Condition D.20.5 shall 

apply. 

D.20.6 Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Limitations [40 CFR 63.7505] [40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD, Table 

1][326 IAC 20-1] 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD, Table 1, the HCl emission rate from Boilers No. 6 

and No.7 shall not exceed 0.0005 pounds per MMBtu heat input. The hydrogen chloride 

emission limit applies at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown, or 

malfunction. 

D.20.7 Carbon Monoxide (CO) Limitations [40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD, Table 1] [40 CFR 63.7505] 

[40 CFR 63.7525] [40 CFR 63.7540] [326 IAC 20-1] 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 63, Subpart DDDDD, Table 1, CO emission rate from each of Boilers 

No. 6 and No.7 shall not exceed 400 ppmdv at 3% Oxygen based on a rolling 30-day 

average. The CO emission limit does not apply during periods of startup, shutdown, 

malfunction, or when boiler loads are below 50% (40 CFR 63.7540(a)(10)(ii). 

D.20.8 PSD Minor Limitations for CO [326 IAC 2-2] 

(a) The total carbon monoxide emissions from Boilers No. 6 and No.7 shall be less 

than 98 tons per twelve consecutive month period with the compliance determined 

at the end of each month. 

During the first twelve (12) months after startup of either Boilers No. 6 or No. 7, the 

total carbon monoxide emissions divided by the accumulated months of operation 

shall not exceed 8.17 tons up to a maximum total of 98 tons for the first twelve (12) 

months of operation of the boilers. 

(b) The hours of operation of the emergency air compressor shall be limited to 500 

hours per year. The Permittee shall monitor the operating hours of the emergency 

air compressor with a non-resettable hour meter, as required by 40 CFR 60.4209(a). 

Compliance with the CO emission limit of Boilers No. 6 and No. 7, and the hours of 

operation of the emergency air compressor will render 326 IAC 2-2 (Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration) not applicable to this modification. 

D.20.9 NSPS Capacity Limitations [AMP approval 11-22-2005] [326 IAC 12] [40 CFR 60, 

 Subpart Db] 

The amount of very low sulfur oil with a maximum sulfur content of 0.3%, burned in each of 

Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 shall be less than 976,740 gallons per year. 

This will limit the very low sulfur oil annual capacity factors of Boilers No. 6 and No.7 to 

less than 10 percent. This fuel oil use limit will qualify fuel oil use as “infrequent use” 

under 40 CFR 60.13(i)(20), which is the requirement of an alternative monitoring plan (AMP) 

for opacity in lieu of installing continuous opacity monitoring systems. 

A quarterly summary of the very low sulfur oil use report shall be submitted with the 

opacity excess emission report. Each quarterly report must be submitted within 30-days 

after the end of each quarter (January-March, April-June, July-September, and OctoberDecember). 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 11 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

This condition expires when the revisions made to 40 CFR 60 Subpart Db as amended on 

February 27, 2006, become effective as Indiana law. This condition is not federally 

enforceable. 

D.20.10 Required Plans and Procedures [40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DDDDD] [326 IAC 20-1] 

(a) Pursuant to 63.7505(d), the Permittee shall develop and submit to the IDEM, OAQ 

for approval a site-specific monitoring plan for Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 that 

addresses paragraphs 40 CFR 7505 (d)(1)(i) through (iii). The Permittee must submit 

this site-specific monitoring plan at least 60 days before the initial performance 

evaluation of CMS. 

(b) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63 7505(e), the Permittee must develop and implement a written 

startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan (SSMP) for Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 

according to the provisions in 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3). 

(c) Continuous Emission Monitor Standard Operating Procedures (CEMS SOP) – The 

Permittee shall prepare and implement a CEMS SOP for each required CEMS. The 

SOP for the CO monitor shall meet the requirements of 40 CFR 63.8(d) and (e). 

D.20.11 Preventive Maintenance Plan [326 IAC 2-7-5(13)] 

A Preventive Maintenance Plan, in accordance with Section B - Preventive Maintenance 

Plan, of this permit, is required for the boilers. 

Testing and Monitoring Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-6(1), (6)] [326 IAC 2-7-5(1)] 

D.20.12 Opacity Monitoring Requirements [U. S. EPA Alternative Monitoring Plan approval 

11/22/2005] [326 IAC 12] 

(a) At least six consecutive minutes of visible emission observations of the stack 

exhaust for Boilers No. 6 and No.7 must be conducted. These must be conducted at 

least once during each daylight shift during which fuel oil is being combusted. 

Visible emissions must be conducted when the maximum rate of fuel oil for that 

shift is being burned. The observer conducting the visible emissions must be 

certified to read visible emissions in accordance with the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency’s Reference Method 9 (USEPA RM9). 

(b) At least six consecutive minutes of visible emissions must be conducted for each 

boiler whenever the respective boiler reaches the expected operating load after a 

cold start-up. These visible emissions readings must be conducted by an observer 

certified in accordance with USEPA RM9. 

(c) If visible emissions conducted in accordance with either condition (a) or condition 

(b) above identify an average opacity exceeding 10 percent, the observer must 

collect at least two additional sets of consecutive six minute visible emissions 

readings within that hour. 

(d) The Permittee must create records of visible emissions in accordance with 40 CFR 

60.7. These records must include at least the date and time of visible emission 

observations along with the results of all readings and average calculated. 

(e) If at any time the annual capacity factor for burning very low sulfur oil is 10 percent 

or more, the Permittee will no longer qualify for this alternative opacity monitoring 

plan. The Permittee will then be required to propose a schedule for installing, 

certifying and operating continuous opacity monitoring system for each boiler 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 12 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

identified above. 

This condition expires when the revisions made to 40 CFR 60 Subpart Db, as amended on 

February 27, 2006, become effective as Indiana law. This condition is not federally 

enforceable. 

D.20.13 Compliance Requirements for SO2 [326 IAC 7-2] [40 CFR 60.45b(j)] [40 CFR 60.47b(f)] 

[326 IAC 12] 

 Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 are subject to the following requirements: 

(a) The Permittee shall burn only natural gas or very low sulfur fuel oil. 

(b) The Permittee shall demonstrate that the oil burned meets the definition of very low 

sulfur fuel oil by: 

(1) Following the performance testing procedures as described in 40 CFR 

60.45b(c) or 40 CFR 60.45b(d); or 

(2) Maintaining fuel receipts as described in 40 CFR 60.49b(r). 

Compliance monitoring is not required when burning very low sulfur fuel oil. 

On and after September 13, 2007, this condition shall also apply to Boilers No. 4 and No. 5. 

D.20.14 Initial Performance Test Requirements for NOx [40 CFR 60.46b] [326 IAC 12] [326 IAC 3-6-

3] [326 IAC 2-7-24] [326 IAC 2-1.1-11] [40 CFR Part 60.8] 

(a) Within 60 days after achieving the maximum production rate, but no later than 180 

days after initial startup, the NOx emissions from Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 shall be 

monitored for 30 successive steam generating unit operating days and the 30-day 

average emission rate shall be used to determine compliance with the nitrogen 

oxides emission standards under 40 CFR 60.44b. The 30-day average emission rate 

is calculated as the average of all hourly emissions data recorded by the 

monitoring system during the 30-day test period. 

(b) Subsequent performance test shall be performed upon request by IDEM, OAQ [40 

CFR 60.46b (e) (4)]. 

D.20.15 Initial and Continuous Compliance Requirements for PM, HCl and CO [40 CFR 63.7506] 

[40 CFR 63.7510] [40 CFR 63.7530] [40 CFR 63.7540] [326 IAC 20-1] 

(a) The Permittee must demonstrate initial compliance with the emission limits of PM 

and HCl and CO work practice standard no later than 180 days after startup of 

Boilers No. 6 and No. 7. 

(b) To demonstrate initial compliance with the emission limits of PM and HCl, the 

Permittee must include a signed statement in the Notification of Compliance Status 

report required in 40 CFR 63.7545(e) that indicates the Permittee burns only liquid 

fossil fuels other than residual oils, either alone or in combination with gaseous 

fuels in Boilers No. 6 and No. 7. 

(c) To demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission limits of PM and HCl, the 

Permittee must keep records that demonstrate that the Permittee burns only liquid 

fossil fuels other than residual oils, either alone or in combination with gaseous 

fuels in Boilers No. 6 and No. 7. The Permittee must also include a signed 

statement in each semiannual compliance report required in 40 CFR 63.7550 that 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 13 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

indicates the 

Permittee burns only liquid fossil fuels other than residual oils, either alone or in 

combination with gaseous fuels, during the reporting period. 

(d) To demonstrate initial compliance with the work practice standard for CO, the 

Permittee shall conduct a performance evaluation of the continuous emission 

monitoring system for carbon monoxide according to 40 CFR 63.7525(a). 

(e) To demonstrate continuous compliance with the work practice standard for CO, the 

Permittee shall meet the requirements of 40 CFR 63.7540(a)(10). 

D.20.16 Continuous Emission Monitoring System (CEMS) Requirements [40 CFR 60.13] [40 CFR 

60.48b] [40 CFR 63.7525] [40 CFR 63.8] [326 IAC 2-1.1-11] [326 IAC 2-7-24] [326 IAC 3-5] 

[40 CFR 60.48b (e) (2)] [326 IAC 12] [326 IAC 20-1] 

(a) NOx CEMS Operation Requirements – The following requirements shall apply to 

Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 when burning natural gas and/or fuel oil: 

(1) The Permittee shall install, calibrate, maintain, evaluate, and operate the 

NOx CEMS in accordance with the procedures in 40 CFR 60.13 and 40 CFR 

60, Appendix F. The span value for the NOx CEMS shall be 500 ppm. If an 

Alternative Monitoring Plan (AMP) is approved per 40 CFR 60.13(i), then the 

conditions in the AMP shall be followed. 

(2) The CEMS shall be operational upon startup of the boilers. 

(3) Continuous operation is defined as one data point every 15-minute period. 

(4) The NOx emissions shall be calculated using stack flow data, or an 

appropriate F- Factor per 40 CFR 60 Appendix A, Method 19. 

(5) The Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) shall include procedures to obtain 

emission data when nitrogen oxides emission data are not obtained 

because of continuous monitoring system breakdowns, repairs, calibration 

checks and zero and span adjustments. The emission data will be obtained 

by using standby monitoring systems, Method 7, Method 7A, or other 

approved reference methods to provide emission data for a minimum of 75 

percent of the operating hours in each steam generating unit operating day, 

in at least 22 out of 30 successive steam generating unit operating days. 

(6) The 1-hour average nitrogen oxides emission rates measured by the 

continuous nitrogen oxides monitor shall be expressed in lb/MMBTU heat 

input and shall be used to calculate the average emission rates under 40 

CFR 60.44b. The 1-hour averages shall be calculated using the data points 

required under 40 CFR 60.13(b). At least two data points must be used to 

calculate each 1-hour average. 

(b) CO and O2 CEMS Operation Requirements – The following requirements shall apply 

to Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 when burning natural gas and/or fuel oil: 

(1) The Permittee shall install, operate, and maintain the CO and O2 CEMS 

according to Performance Specification (PS) 4A of 40 CFR part 60, appendix 

B [40 CFR 63.7525(a)(1)] and according to the site-specific monitoring plan 

developed according to 40 CFR 63.7505(d). If an Alternative Monitoring Plan 

(AMP) is approved per 40 CFR 63.8(f), then the conditions in the AMP shall 

be met and followed. 

(2) The CEMS shall be installed and operational upon startup of the boilers. 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 14 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

(3) Continuous operation is defined as the collection of at least one 

measurement for each successive 15-minute period, regardless of startup, 

shutdown and malfunction. [40 CFR 63.7535(a)(3)] 

(4) The 30-day rolling average shall be calculated on a daily basis as the 

average of all of the hourly averages in the preceding 30 days [40 CFR 

63.7525(a)(5). 

(5) Data recorded during periods of monitoring malfunctions, associated 

repairs, out-of-control periods, required quality assurance or control 

activities, or when the boiler is operating at less than 50 percent of its rated 

capacity shall not be used to determine compliance. Any period for which 

the monitoring system is out of control and data are not available for 

required calculations constitute a deviation from the monitoring 

requirements. [63.7525(a)(6)] 

(c) CEMS Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) – The Permittee shall prepare and 

implement an SOP that provides step-by-step procedures and operations in 

accordance with 326 IAC 3-5-4(a). This includes preventive maintenance 

procedures and corrective actions that include those procedures taken to ensure 

continuous operation and to minimize malfunctions. The SOP must be submitted to 

IDEM within 90 days of installation of the monitors. 

(d) The commissioner may require stack testing, monitoring, or reporting at any time 

to assure compliance with all applicable requirements. Any monitoring or testing 

shall be performed in accordance with 326 IAC 3 or other methods approved by the 

commissioner or the U.S. EPA. 

Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements [326 IAC 2-7-5(3)] [326 IAC 2-7-19] 

D.20.17 Record Keeping Requirements 

The Permittee shall maintain the following records: 

(a) The records of the carbon monoxide emissions, in tons per month, from Boilers No. 

6 and No. 7 and hours of operation of the emergency compressor; 

(b) The monthly records of the amount of very low sulfur oil burned in each Boilers No. 

6 and No. 7, and the capacity factor of each of Boilers No. 6 and No. 7; 

This condition expires when the revisions made to 40 CFR 60 Subpart Db as 

amended on February 27, 2006, become effective as Indiana law. This condition is 

not federally enforceable. 

(c) Receipts or test analysis for fuel oil burned in Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 certifying that 

the fuel oil is less than 0.3% sulfur content [40 CFR 60.42b(j), 40 CFR 60.49b(r )]; 

(d) Daily records of all fuel burned in Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 [40 CFR 60.49b(d), 40 CFR 

63.7555(d)(1)]; 

(e) Annual capacity factor for each fuel burned in Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 calculated 

monthly using a 12-month rolling average [40 CFR60.49b(d)]; 

(f) Records of any visual opacity reading of Boilers No. 6 and No. 7. These records 

must include the date and time of the observations, the results of all readings, and 

the averages calculated; 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 15 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

This condition expires when the revisions made to 40 CFR 60 Subpart Db as 

amended on February 27, 2006, become effective as Indiana law. This condition is 

not federally enforceable. 

(g) NOx Emissions data for each of Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 operating day: 

(1) Average hourly NOx emissions in lbs/MMBtu [40 CFR 60.49b(g)(2)]; 

(2) Rolling 30-day average NOx emissions in lbs/MMBtu [40 CFR 60.49b(g)(3)]; 

(3) Periods when the 30-day NOx average exceeds the limit in D.20.3 [40 CFR 

60.49b (g) (4) and 40 CFR 60.49b (h) (4)]; 

(4) Days when sufficient data was not obtained [40 CFR 60.49b(g)(5)]; 

(5) Times and reasons for excluding data [40 CFR 60.49b(g)(6)]; 

(6) Any F factors used to calculate NOx emissions, method of determination, 

and type of fuel combusted [40 CFR 60.49b(g)(7)]; 

(7) Times when full span was exceeded [40 CFR 60.49b(g)(8)]; 

(8) Description of any modifications to the CEMS that could affect the ability of 

the system to comply with Performance Standard 2 [40 CFR 60.49b(g)(9)]; 

and 

(9) Results of CEMS daily drift tests and quarterly accuracy assessments [40 

CFR 60.49b(g)(10)]. 

(h) CO Emissions data for Boilers No. 6 and No. 7: 

(1) Each period during which a CMS or CEMS on Boilers No. 6 and No.7 is 

malfunctioning or inoperative (including out-of-control periods) [40 CFR 

63.10(b)]; 

(2) All required measurements needed to demonstrate compliance with the CO 

standard for Boilers No. 6 and No.7 (including, but not limited to, 15-minute 

averages of CEMS data, raw performance testing measurements, and raw 

performance evaluation measurements, that support data that the source is 

required to report) [40 CFR 63.10(b)]; 

(3) All results of CEMS performance evaluations [40 CFR 63.10(b)]; 

(4) All measurements as may be necessary to determine the conditions of 

performance evaluations [40 CFR 63.10(b)]; 

(5) All CMS calibration checks [40 CFR 63.10(b)]; 

(6) All adjustments and maintenance performed on the CEMS [40 CFR 

63.10(b)]; 

(7) Previous (i.e., superseded) versions of the CEMS SOP as required in 

40 CFR 63.8(d) (3); 

(8) Records of the date and time that each deviation started and stopped, and 

whether the deviation occurred during a period of startup, shutdown, or 

malfunction or during another period [40 CFR 63.7555 (a) (5)]; 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 16 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

(9) Hourly CO average in ppmdv [63.7525(a)(5)]; 

(10) 30-day rolling CO average in ppmdv calculated as average of all hourly 

averages in the 30 day period [63.7525(a)(5)]; and 

(11) The boiler hourly emissions shall be computed using the data points 

required under 40 CFR 63.8(g) and 40 CFR 63.2, appropriate F factors, 

and/or the emission factors in the paragraphs (ii) and (iii): 

(i) 1-hour averages shall be computed from four or more data points 

equally spaced over each 1-hour period, except during periods 

when calibration, quality assurance, or maintenance activities are 

being performed. During these periods, a valid hourly average shall 

consist of at least two data points with each representing a 15-

minute period. Alternatively, an arithmetic or integrated 1-hour 

average of CEMS data may be used. At least two equally spaced 

data points must be used to calculate each 1 - hour average; [40 

CFR 63.8(g)] 

(ii) When burning natural gas: 84 lbs of CO/million cubic feet of gas 

burned or 12.9 lbs/hr; and 

(iii) When burning fuel oil: 5 lbs of CO/thousand gallons of oil or 5.58 

lbs/hr. 

 (i) Records of the operation of T26-GEN-7500A Diesel Powered Emergency Generator 

in emergency and non-emergency service. This shall include the time of operation 

and the reason the engine was in operation at that time [40CFR 60.4214(b)]. 

(j) Pursuant to 40 CFR 63.10(b), the Permittee shall maintain files of all information 

(including all reports and notifications) required by the general provisions and 

subpart DDDDD of 40 CFR 63. This subsection is applicable only to Boilers No. 6 

and No. 7. 

(1) The Permittee shall retain each record for at least 5 years following the date 

of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, 

or record. The most recent 2 years of records shall be retained at the 

facility. The remaining 3 years of records may be retained off site; 

(2) The Permittee may retain records on microfilm, computer disks, magnetic 

tape, or microfiche; and 

(3) The Permittee shall report required information on paper or on a labeled 

computer disk. 

(k) On and after September 13, 2007, the Permittee shall record the information 

described in item (1) through (4) below on a calendar month basis for Boiler No. 4, 

and Boiler No. 5: 

(1) The amount (expressed in thousands of gallons (Mgal)) of No. 2 fuel oil 

burned in Boilers No. 4 and No. 5; 

(2) The average sulfur content (expressed in percentage by weight) of the No. 2 

fuel oil burned in Boilers No. 4 and No. 5; 

(3) The average higher heating value (expressed in Btu per gallon) of the No. 2 

fuel oil burned in Boilers No. 4 and No. 5; and 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 17 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

(4) The average sulfur dioxide emission rate (expressed in pounds per MMBtu) 

of the No. 2 fuel oil for Boilers No. 4 and No. 5. 

D.20.18 Reporting Requirements 

(a) A certification shall be submitted to the IDEM, OAQ, stating that only Very Low 

Sulfur Oil was burned in Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 [40 CFR 60.49b(r)] and a statement 

that only liquid fossil fuels other than residual oil were burned in Boilers No. 6 and 

No. 7 [40 CFR 63.7506(a)(2)]. The certification does require the certification by the 

“responsible official” as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

(b) A quarterly summary of the information to document compliance with Conditions 

D.20.8 (a) and (b) shall be submitted to the IDEM, OAQ, using the reporting forms 

located at the end of this permit, or their equivalent, within thirty (30) days after the 

end of the quarter being reported. The report submitted by the Permittee does 

require the certification by the “responsible official” as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-

1(34). 

(c) A quarterly summary of the information to document compliance with Condition 

D.20.9 and 40 CFR 63.7550(c)(4) shall be submitted to the IDEM, OAQ, using the 

reporting forms located at the end of this permit, or their equivalent, within thirty 

(30) days after the end of the quarter being reported. The report submitted by the 

Permittee does require the certification by the “responsible official” as defined by 

326 IAC 2-7-1(34). 

(d) The following information shall be reported quarterly: 

(1) For Boilers No. 6 and No. 7, all NOx emission records described in 

D.20.17(g) 

[40 CFR 60.49b(i)]; 

(2) A statement that only very low sulfur fuel was burned in Boilers No. 6 and 

No. 7 [40 CFR 60.49b(r)]; 

(3) The total fuel used by Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 for each calendar month 

[40 CFR 63.7550(c) (4)]; 

(4) A statement that no new fuels were burned in Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 

[40 CFR 63.7550(c) (6)]; 

(5) SSM report as described in 40 CFR 63.10(d)(5)(i) [40 CFR 63.7550(c)(9)]; 

(6) Description of any deviations occurring in Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 

containing the information required by 40 CFR 60.7550 (d) and (e), or a 

statement that there were none [40 CFR 63.7550(c)(10)]; 

(7) Description of any CEMS downtime events, or a statement that there were 

none [40 CFR 63.7550(c)(11)]; 

(8) An excess emissions report for Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 that identifies any 

opacity excess emissions, the time and date of the visible emission 

readings and the total time of the visible emission observations for each 

date, and the total number of hours that oil was burned during each quarter. 

 Excess emissions are any 6-minute period when the average visible 

emissions exceeded 20%. If oil was not used, then the report shall indicate 

that fuel oil was not combusted. [40 CFR 60.49b(h)] This condition expires 

when the revisions made to 40 CFR 60 Subpart Db, as amended on 

February 27, 2006, become effective as Indiana Law. This condition is not 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 18 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

federally enforceable; and 

(9) The excess emission report for Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 must provide the 

calculations showing the annual capacity factor for burning fuel oil at each 

boiler. [Opacity AMP] This condition expires when the revisions made to 40 

CFR 60 Subpart Db, as amended on February 27, 2006, become effective as 

Indiana Law. This condition is not federally enforceable. 

(e) Immediate Reporting Requirements 

The reporting requirements in the NESHAP General Provisions for Startup, 

Shutdown and Malfunction (SSM) Plans [40 CFR 63.6(e)(3)] shall be used to satisfy 

the reporting requirements under the NESHAP for Industrial, Commercial, and 

Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters [40 CRF 63.7505(e)]. 

(1) Any time an action taken by the Permittee during an SSM event of a process 

is not consistent with the procedures specified in the SSM Plan, the 

Permittee shall report the actions taken for that event. The immediate report 

shall be submitted to the IDEM, OAQ via a telephone call or facsimile within 

2 working days after commencing actions inconsistent with the plan. 

(2) Within 7 working days after the end of an SSM event of a process where an 

action taken by the Permittee is not consistent with the procedures 

specified in the SSM Plan, the Permittee shall submit a letter containing the 

following information in accordance with 40 CFR 63.10(d)(5): 

(A) Name, title and signature of responsible official certifying accuracy; 

 

(B) Explanation of the circumstances of the event; 

(C) Reason for not following the SSM Plan; and 

(D) Report any excess emissions and/or parameter monitoring 

exceedances are believed to have occurred. 

(f) On and after September 13, 2007, the Permittee shall submit quarterly summary 

reports of the monthly fuel oil characteristic and consumption records required by 

Condition D.20.17 for Boilers No. 4 and No. 5.
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 19 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

D.20.19 Applicability of 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart ZZZZ-National Emission Standards for Hazardous 

Air Pollutants for Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines (RICE MACT). 

The emergency generator or the air compressor has a site-rating of less than 500 brake 

horsepower. Therefore, the emergency generator and the air compressor are not subject to 

the requirements of 40 CFR 63, Subpart ZZZZ (National Emissions Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants for Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines). 

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY 

COMPLIANCE DATA SECTION 

PART 70 OPERATING PERMIT 

SEMI-ANNUAL BOILERS NO. 6 and NO. 7 CERTIFICATION 

Source Name: Eli Lilly and Company, Tippecanoe Laboratories 

Source Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Mailing Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Part 70 Permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

Facility: Boilers No. 6 and No.7 

 Natural Gas 

 Very Low Sulfur Oil 

From: To: 

I certify that, based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements 

and information in the document are true, accurate, and complete. 

Signature: 

Printed Name: 

Title/Position: 

Phone: 

Date: 

A certification by the responsible official as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-1(34) is required for this report. 

 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 20 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY 

COMPLIANCE DATA SECTION 

Part 70 Quarterly Report 

Source Name: Eli Lilly and Company, Tippecanoe Laboratories 

Source Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Mailing Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Part 70 Permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

Facility: Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 

Parameter: CO 

Limit: 98 tons/12 months 

Quarter:________________ YEAR:__________ 

Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 + Column 2 

Month 

This Month Previous 11 Months 12 Month Total 

Month 1 

Month 2 

Month 3 

 No deviation occurred in this quarter. 

 Deviation/s occurred in this quarter. 

 Deviation has been reported on: ___________________________ 

Submitted by: _____________________________________________ 

Title / Position:_____________________________________________ 

Signature:_________________________________________________ 

Date: _____________________________________________________ 

Phone: ___________________________________________________

Attach a signed certification to complete this report. 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 21 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY 

COMPLIANCE DATA SECTION 

Part 70 Quarterly Report 

for First 12 months of Operation 

Source Name: Eli Lilly and Company, Tippecanoe Laboratories 

Source Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Mailing Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Part 70 Permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

Facility: Boilers No. 6 and No. 7 

Parameter: CO 

Limits: (1) 98 ton/12 months 

(2) Running Monthly Average: 8.17 tons 

Quarter:________________ YEAR:__________ 

Column 

1 Column 2 

Column 1 

+ 

Column 2 

 (Column 1 + Column 2) .

(Total Months of Operation) 

Month This 

Month 

Previous 

11 Months 

*Total Months 

of Operation 

Running average 

up to current month 

Month 1 

Month 2 

Month 3 

* When determining the total usage for previous 11 months, assume zero usage during the 

 months when the boilers were not in operation. 

 No deviation occurred in this quarter. 

 Deviation/s occurred in this quarter. 

 Deviation has been reported on: ___________________________ 

Submitted by: _____________________________________________ 

Title / Position:_____________________________________________ 

Signature:_________________________________________________ 

Date: _____________________________________________________ 

Phone: ___________________________________________________ 

Attach a signed certification to complete this report. 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 22 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY 

COMPLIANCE DATA SECTION 

Part 70 Quarterly Report 

Source Name: Eli Lilly and Company, Tippecanoe Laboratories 

Source Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Mailing Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Part 70 Permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

Facility: Boiler No. 6 

Parameter: Very low sulfur oil and hours fuel oil burned 

Limit: Less than 976,740 gallons/year = < 10% annual capacity for fuel oil 

YEAR:__________ 

Column 1 

This Quarter 

Column 2 

Year Total 

Column 3 

(Column 1 + 

Column 2) 

Quarter Year Total 

No. of 

gallons 

No. of 

hours 

No. of 

gallons 

No. of 

hours 

No. of 

gallons

No. of 

hours 

Annual Capacity 

for fuel oil 

Quarter 1 

January-March 0.0 0.0 

 

Quarter 2 

April-June 

 

Quarter 3 

July-September 

 

Quarter 4 

OctoberDecember  

 

The boiler‘s maximum capacity to burn fuel oil is 9,767,400 gallons. 

Annual Capacity = No. of gallons of fuel oil burned up to date for the year /9,767,400 gallons 

 No deviation occurred in this quarter. 

 Deviation/s occurred in this quarter. 

 Deviation has been reported on: ___________________________ 

Submitted by: _____________________________________________ 

Title / Position:_____________________________________________ 

Signature:_________________________________________________ 

Date: _____________________________________________________ 

Phone: ___________________________________________________ 

Attach a signed certification to complete this report. 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 23 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY 

COMPLIANCE DATA SECTION 

Part 70 Quarterly Report 

Source Name: Eli Lilly and Company, Tippecanoe Laboratories 

Source Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Mailing Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Part 70 Permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

Facility: Boiler No. 7 

Parameter: Very low sulfur oil and hours fuel oil burned 

Limit: Less than 976,740 gallons/year = < 10% annual capacity for fuel oil 

YEAR:__________ 

Column 1 

This Quarter 

Column 2 

Year Total 

Column 3 

(Column 1 + 

Column 2) 

Quarter Year Total 

No. of 

gallons 

No. of 

hours 

No. of 

gallons 

No. of 

hours 

No. of 

gallons

No. of 

hours 

Annual Capacity 

Quarter 1 

January-March 0.0 0.0 

 

Quarter 2 

April-June 

 

Quarter 3 

July-September 

 

Quarter 4 

OctoberDecember  

 

The boiler‘s maximum capacity to burn fuel oil is 9,767,400 gallons. 

Annual Capacity = No. of gallons of fuel oil burned up to date for the year /9,767,400 gallons 

 No deviation occurred in this quarter. 

 Deviation/s occurred in this quarter. 

 Deviation has been reported on: ___________________________ 

Submitted by: _____________________________________________ 

Title / Position:_____________________________________________ 

Signature:_________________________________________________ 

Date: _____________________________________________________

Phone: ___________________________________________________ 

Attach a signed certification to complete this report. 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 24 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY 

COMPLIANCE DATA SECTION 

Part 70 Annual Report 

Source Name: Eli Lilly and Company, Tippecanoe Laboratories 

Source Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Mailing Address: 1650 Lilly Road, Lafayette, Indiana 47909 

Part 70 Permit No.: T157-6879-00006 

Facility: Emergency Air Compressor (T26-COMP 5600A) 

Parameter: Hour of operation 

Limit: 500 Hours/year 

YEAR:_____________ 

Hours of Operation 

 No deviation occurred in quarter. 

 Deviation/s occurred in this quarter. 

 Deviation has been reported on: ___________________________ 

Submitted by: _____________________________________________ 

Title / Position:_____________________________________________ 

Signature:_________________________________________________ 

Date: _____________________________________________________ 

Phone: ___________________________________________________ 

Attach a signed certification to complete this report. 

(8) Condition C.5 has been deleted, since a requirement to operate emission control 

equipment has been added in SECTION Ds. Subsequent conditions have been renumbered accordingly: 

C.5 Operation of Equipment [326 IAC 2-7-6(6)] 

Except as otherwise provided by statute or rule, or in this permit, all air pollution control equipment 

listed in this permit and used to comply with an applicable requirement shall be operated at all 

times that the emission units vented to the control equipment is in operation.
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 25 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

(9) Diesel generator (Gen-7001), which is an insignificant activity, has been added in Section 

D.2(b) as the source requested: 

 

 (b) The following emission units are not subject to applicable requirements described 

in this D section and are listed only for informational purposes: 

Emission 

Unit ID 

Emission Unit 

Description Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity UOM Control Device 

Building T5: 

T5* Diesel Generator N/A 380 HP None 

Portable Units: 

T62* Diesel Generator N/A 1100 KW None 

T135* Diesel Generator N/A 390 HP None 

T78* Diesel Compressor N/A 58 KW None 

T89-1* Diesel Compressor N/A 58 KW None 

T89-2* Diesel Compressor N/A 58 KW None 

Building T97/T98: 

T97/T98* Glycol System N/A 45,000 gallon None 

Building T9/T23: 

T9/T23* Lime Storage Silo N/A 79.5 lb/hr None 

Building T70: 

Gen-7001* Diesel Generator N/A 300 KW None 

* Emission units marked with a single asterisk are insignificant activities as defined in 326 IAC 2-7-1(21). 

(10) The following condition has been added and numbered D.5.9 under Compliance 

Determination Section, since C.5, Operation of Equipment has been deleted from the 

permit. Subsequent conditions have been re-numbered accordingly: 

 

Compliance Determination Requirements

D.5.9 Operation of Control Equipment [326 IAC 2-7-6(6)]

Except as otherwise provided by statute or rule, or in this permit, the Iron Sponge Reactor 

shall be operated at all times that the emission units vented to the Iron Sponge Reactor are 

in operation. 

(11) An administrative amendment application has been submitted to IDEM, OAQ on February 

27, 2006. However, an amendment has never been issued. The following were the 

requests, which will be included in this proposed significant permit modification: 

 (a) Remove T27-RVD53-1. This process unit has been removed. 

(b) Remove T27-IBC8202. This process unit has been removed. 

 (c) Remove T27-IBC8208. This process unit has been removed. 

 (d) Remove T27-IBC8210. This process unit has been removed. 

 (e) Remove T27-IBC8252. This process unit has been removed. 

 (f) Remove T27-IBC8255. This process unit has been removed. 

 (g) Remove T27-IBC8258. This process unit has been removed. 

 (h) Add T99-FD-9D. This is an insignificant activity. 

 (i) Add T99-D-9D. This is an insignificant activity. 

 

 (j) Add T99-D-9B. This is an insignificant activity. 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 26 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

 (k) Add T100-Tk5C. This is an insignificant activity. 

(l) Add T100-Tk18A. This is an insignificant activity. 

 (m) Add T100-TK18B. This is an insignificant activity. 

 (n) Add T100-TK24D. This is an insignificant activity. 

 (o) Remove T100 Portable Process Tank. This process unit has been removed. 

SECTION D.6 BULK PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURING (BPM) PRODUCTION OPERATIONS 

Facility description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)]

The information describing the processes contained in the facility description boxes is descriptive 

information and does not constitute enforceable conditions: 

(a) The emission units listed below are subject to applicable requirements described or referred to in 

this D section. The emission units in the BPM production operations can be generally described 

as process vessels (tanks), crystallizers, filters, centrifuges, dryers, process scrubber systems, 

and process condenser systems and are referred to as process vents under the National Emission 

Standards of Hazardous Air Pollutants for Pharmaceutical Production Operations (Pharmaceutical 

MACT) found at 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGG. 

General activities such as open manway operations, charging a liquid from a drum to a tank, 

centrifuge emptying operations, drum filling operations, or loading wetcake into driers are also 

defined as process vents. Individual identification of these activities are not listed in the 

description tables given they are not stationary or continually change. Each of these activity types 

will follow the compliance requirements outlined in this permit section. 

Ancillary activities, such as heat exchange systems, are not considered process vents and have 

not been included in the description tables. 

Source ID Equipment Description Stack/Vent ID Nominal Capacity Control Device 

Building T27: 

T27-TK30-1 Process Tank RTO 200 gal RTO 

T27-TK30-2 Process Tank RTO 200 gal RTO 

T27-TK31-1 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK31-2 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK31-3 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK31-4 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK31-5 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK32-1 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK32-2 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK32-3 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK32-4 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK32-5 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK32-6 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK32-7 Process Tank RTO 350 gal RTO 

T27-TK33-1 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK33-2 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK33-3 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK33-4 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK33-5 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T27-TK33-6 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK34-1 Process Tank RTO 750 gal RTO 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 27 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

Source ID Equipment Description Stack/Vent ID Nominal Capacity Control Device 

T27-TK34-2 Process Tank RTO 750 gal RTO 

T27-TK34-4 Process Tank RTO 750 gal RTO 

T27-TK34-5 Process Tank RTO 750 gal RTO 

T27-TK34-6 Process Tank RTO 750 gal RTO 

T27-TK34-7 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK34-8 Process Tank RTO 350 gal RTO 

T27-TK35-1 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK35-2 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK35-3 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK35-4 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK35-5 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T27-TK35-6 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK35-10B Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK36-1 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK36-2 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK36-3 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK36-6 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK36-7 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T27-TK37-2A Process Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T27-TK38-3 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-1 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-2 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-4 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-5 Process Tank RTO 1500 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-6 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-6A Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-7 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-7A Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-8 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-9 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-10 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-11 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-13 Process Tank RTO 750 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-14 Process Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T27-TK40-31 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T27-TK41-1 Process Tank RTO 750 gal RTO 

T27-TK41-3 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T27-TK41-4 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T27-TK41-5 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK41-6 Process Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T27-TK42-3 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T27-TK42-5 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK43-1 Process Tank RTO 750 gal RTO 

T27-TK43-2 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T27-TK44-1 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK44-4 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T27-TK45-2 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK45-3 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 28 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

Source ID Equipment Description Stack/Vent ID Nominal Capacity Control Device 

T27-TK46-1 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK46-5 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK47-1 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK47-2 Process Tank RTO 550 gal RTO 

T27-TK47-3 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK47-5 Process Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T27-TK48-1 Process Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T27-TK48-1A Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T27-TK48-2A Process Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

T27-TK48-3A Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T27-TK49-1 Process Tank RTO 200 gal RTO 

T27-TK50-1 Process Tank RTO 650 gal RTO 

T27-TK50-2 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T27-TK50-3 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T27-TK50-4 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T27-TK372-A Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T27-CENT9 Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T27-CENT16 Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T27-CENT19 Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T27-CENT30 Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T27-CENT37 Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T27-CENT38 Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T27-CENT40 Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T27-DT46-1 Process Tank RTO RTO 

T27-RVD53-1 Process Dryer RTO NA RTO

T27-RVD53-2 Process Dryer RTO NA RTO 

T27-SCR30-4 Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

T27-SCR33-7 Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

T27-SCR34-9 Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

T27-SCR35-10A Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

T27-SCR35-10B Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC31-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC32-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC32-2 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC32-3 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC33-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC33-2 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC33-3 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC33-4 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC35-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC35-2 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC35-4 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC36-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC36-2 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC36-3 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC40 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC40-2 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC40-5 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 29 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

Source ID Equipment Description Stack/Vent ID Nominal Capacity Control Device 

T27-VC40-7A Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC43-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC44-4 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC45-2 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC46-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC47-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC48-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC48-1A Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC49-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC50-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC53-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC53-2 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-VC53-10 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T27-PORTVC 

Portable Process 

Condenser RTO NA RTO 

Building T28: 

T28-CENT1 Heinkel Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T28-CENT2 Heinkel Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T28-CENT3 Heinkel Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T28-CENT15 Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T28-CENT22 Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T28-CENT24 Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T28-CENT26 Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T28-TK28-1 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-1A Process Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-2 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-3 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-3A Process Tank RTO 340 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-03 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-4 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-5 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-6 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-7 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-8 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-9 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-10 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-10A Process Tank RTO 340 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-11 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-12 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-13 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-14 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-15 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-16 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-17 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-18 Process Tank RTO 750 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-19 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-20 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 30 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

Source ID Equipment Description Stack/Vent ID Nominal Capacity Control Device 

T28-TK28-21 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-22 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-23 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-24 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-25 Process Tank RTO 1500 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-26 Process Tank RTO 1500 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-27 Process Tank RTO 140 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-29 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-30 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-31 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-TK28-32 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T28-PTK1 Portable Charge Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T28-PTK2 Portable Charge Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T28-PTK3 Portable Charge Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T28-SCR1 Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

T28-SCR2 Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

T28-SCR3 Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

T28-SCR4 Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

T28-SCR6 Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

T28-SCRTK1 Scrubber Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T28-SCRTK2 Scrubber Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T28-SCRTK4 Scrubber Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T28-VC28-1 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T28-VC28-3 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T28-VC28-4 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T28-VC28-5 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T28-VC28-6 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T28-VC28-8 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T28-VC28-10 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T28-VC28-11 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T28-VC28-12 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

Building T29: 

T29-CENT1401 Heinkel Centrifuge RTO 70 gal RTO 

T29-CENT2401 Heinkel Centrifuge RTO 70 gal RTO 

T29-CENT3401 Heinkel Centrifuge RTO 70 gal RTO 

T29-DRY1501 Cone Dryer RTO 580 gal RTO 

T29-DRY2402 Filter Dryer RTO 863 gal RTO 

T29-DRY2502 Filter Dryer RTO 863 gal RTO 

T29-DRY3501 Cone Dryer RTO 580 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8201 Process Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8202 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO

T29-IBC8203 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8204 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8205 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8206 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8207 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8208 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 31 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

Source ID Equipment Description Stack/Vent ID Nominal Capacity Control Device 

T29-IBC8209 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8210 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO

T29-IBC8216 Process Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8217 Process Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8251 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8252 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO

T29-IBC8253 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8254 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8255 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO

T29-IBC8256 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8257 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8258 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO

T29-IBC8259 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8380 Process Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T29-IBC8381 Process Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T29-SFH1121 Process Tank RTO NA RTO 

T29-SFH3121 Process Tank RTO NA RTO 

T29-TK1201 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK1202 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK1203 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK1204 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK1205 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK2201 Process Tank RTO 1600 gal RTO 

T29-TK2202 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK2203 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK2204 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK2205 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK3201 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK3202 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK3203 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK3204 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK3205 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK4201 Process Tank RTO 1600 gal RTO 

T29-TK4203 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T29-TK7920 Process Tank RTO 200 gal RTO 

T29-TK7921 Process Tank RTO 80 gal RTO 

T29-TK8211 Process Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

T29-TK8212 Process Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

T29-TK8213 Process Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

T29-TK8214 Process Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

T29-TK8216 Process Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T29-TK8218 Process Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T29-TK8220 Process Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T29-TK8501 Process Tank RTO 0.75 sf RTO 

T29-HE1201 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE1202 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE1203 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE1204 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 32 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

Source ID Equipment Description Stack/Vent ID Nominal Capacity Control Device 

T29-HE1205 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE2201 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE2202 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE2203 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE2204 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE2205 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE3201 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE3202 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE3203 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE3204 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE3205 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE4201 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-HE4203 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T29-TK1203A Accumulator Tank RTO 70 gal RTO 

T29-TK1204A Accumulator Tank RTO 70 gal RTO 

T29-TK1401A Accumulator Tank RTO 70 gal RTO 

T29-TK2401A Accumulator Tank RTO 70 gal RTO 

T29-TK3401A Accumulator Tank RTO 70 gal RTO 

T29-TK4201A Accumulator Tank RTO 70 gal RTO 

T29-SCR1601 Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

T29-SCR2601 Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

T29-SCR3601 Process Scrubber RTO NA RTO 

Building T31: 

T31-CENT Centrifuge RTO 13 cf RTO 

T31-CENT504 Centrifuge RTO 13 gal RTO 

T31-FD803 Filter Dryer RTO 0.6 m2 RTO 

T31-TK601 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31-TK602 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31-TK603 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31-TK604 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31-TK611 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31-TK611DT01 Process Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T31-TK612 Process Tank RTO 500gal RTO 

T31-TK613 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31-TK614 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31-TK631 Process Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T31-TK641 Process Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

T31-TK643 Process Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

T31-HE501 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31-HE503 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31-HE511 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31-HE512 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31-HE531 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31-HE541 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31-SCR-OZ 

Process Scrubber 

(Ozone) RTO N/A RTO 

T31-SCR721 Process Scrubber RTO 200 gal RTO 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 33 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

Source ID Equipment Description Stack/Vent ID Nominal Capacity Control Device 

Building T31A: 

T31A-CENT981 Centrifuge RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-FD861 Filter Dryer RTO 0.6 m2 RTO 

T31A-FD874 Filter Dryer RTO 0.6 m2 RTO 

T31A-RVD881 Dryer RTO 100 cf RTO 

T31A-RVD891 Dryer RTO 100 cf RTO 

T31A-DT683 Drowning Tank 001 RTO NA RTO 

T31A-TK621 Process Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T31A-TK622 Process Tank RTO 800 gal RTO 

T31A-TK623 Process Tank RTO 400 gal RTO 

T31A-TK624 Process Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T31A-TK625 Process Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T31A-TK626 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31A-TK651 Process Tank RTO 450 gal RTO 

T31A-TK661 Process Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T31A-TK681 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31A-TK682 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31A-TK683 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31A-TK684 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31A-TK691 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31A-TK692 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31A-TK693 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31A-TK694 Process Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31A-TK861K Process Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T31A-HE481 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-HE482 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-HE491 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-HE492 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-HE521 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-HE551 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-HE561 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-HE581 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-HE583 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-HE591 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-HE593 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-HE781 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-HE791 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-SCR261 Process Scrubber RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-SCR262 Process Scrubber RTO N/A RTO 

T31A-SCR781 Process Scrubber RTO 200 gal RTO 

T31A-SCR791 Process Scrubber RTO 500 gal RTO 

T31A-SCRTK781 Process Scrubber Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T31A-SCRTK791 Process Scrubber Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

Building T99: 

T99-CENT Heinkel Centrifuge RTO NA RTO 

T99-PD43 Pan Dryer RTO 528 gal RTO 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 34 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

Source ID Equipment Description Stack/Vent ID Nominal Capacity Control Device 

T99-PD44 Pan Dryer RTO 528 gal RTO 

T99-RVD1 Rotary Vacuum Dryer RTO 1200 gal RTO 

T99-RVD2 Rotary Vacuum Dryer RTO 1200 gal RTO 

T99-RVD3 Rotary Vacuum Dryer RTO 1200 gal RTO 

T99-RVD5 Rotary Vacuum Dryer RTO 1200 gal RTO 

T99-RVD6 Rotary Vacuum Dryer RTO 1200 gal RTO 

T99-RVD7 Rotary Vacuum Dryer RTO 1200 gal RTO 

T99-RVD8 Rotary Vacuum Dryer RTO 1200 gal RTO 

T99-FD-9D* Filter Dryer RTO NA RTO 

T99-D-9D* Portable Tank RTO 155 gal RTO 

T99-D-9B* Condensate Tank RTO 10 gal RTO 

T99-TK-D41 Process Tank RTO 300 gal RTO 

T99-TK-D42 Process Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T99-HE43 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

T99-HE44 Process Condenser RTO NA RTO 

Building T100: 

T100-CENT60 Centrifuge RTO N/A RTO 

T100-CENT61 Centrifuge RTO N/A RTO 

T100-CENT62 Centrifuge RTO N/A RTO 

T100-CENT63 Centrifuge RTO N/A RTO 

T100-CENT64 Centrifuge RTO N/A RTO 

T100-CENT65 Centrifuge RTO N/A RTO 

T100-CENT66 Centrifuge RTO N/A RTO 

T100-CENT67 Centrifuge RTO N/A RTO 

T100-CENT68 Centrifuge RTO N/A RTO 

T100-CENT69 Centrifuge RTO N/A RTO 

T100-CENT70 Centrifuge RTO N/A RTO 

T100-TK1 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T100-TK1C Process Tank RTO N/A RTO 

T100-TK2 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK3 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T100-TK4 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T100-TK5 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T100-Tk5C* Accumulator Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T100-TK6 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T100-TK7 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK8 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK8C Process Tank RTO 30 gal RTO 

T100-TK9 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK10 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK11 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK12 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK13 Process Tank RTO 3300 Gal RTO 

T100-TK14 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK15 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T100-TK16 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T100-TK17 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 35 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

Source ID Equipment Description Stack/Vent ID Nominal Capacity Control Device 

T100-TK18 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T100-TK18A* Distillate Tank RTO 200 gal RTO 

T100-TK18B* Charge Tank RTO 60 gal RTO 

T100-TK20 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK21 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK22 Process Tank RTO 2000 gal RTO 

T100-TK24 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK24D* Distillate Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T100-TK25 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK26 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK27 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK28 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK29 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK30 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK-30A Process Tank RTO 70 gal RTO 

T100-TK31 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK31B Process Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T100-TK32 Process Tank RTO 4000 gal RTO 

T100-TK33 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T100-TK34 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T100-TK35 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T100-TK36 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T100-TK37 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T100-TK38 Process Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T100 Portable Process Tank RTO N/A RTO

T100 Portable Process Tank RTO N/A RTO 

T100-PTK1 Portable Cleaning Tank RTO 150 gal RTO 

T100-HE1 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE1C Process Condenser N/A 

T100-HE2 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE4 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE6 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE7 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE8 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE11 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE12 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE13 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE14 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE14B Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE16 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE21A Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE21B Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE26 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE28 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-HE31 Process Condenser RTO N/A RTO 

T100-TK14A Accumulator Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T100-TK21A Accumulator Tank RTO 50 gal RTO 

T100-TK39 CIP Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 36 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

Source ID Equipment Description Stack/Vent ID Nominal Capacity Control Device 

T100-SCR80 Process Scrubber RTO N/A RTO 

T100-SCR81 Process Scrubber RTO N/A RTO 

T100-SCR82 Process Scrubber RTO N/A RTO 

T100-SCR83 Process Scrubber RTO N/A RTO 

T100-SCR84 Process Scrubber RTO N/A RTO 

T100-SCR85 Process Scrubber RTO N/A RTO 

T100-TK82 Scrubber Holding Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T100-TK83 Scrubber Holding Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T100-TK84 Scrubber Holding Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

T100-TK85 Scrubber Holding Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

* Emission units marked with a single asterisk are insignificant activities as defined in 326 IAC 2-7-1(21). 

(12) The Permittee has requested the following change to Condition D.6.1, to avoid reporting 

multiple deviations from conditions that are interrelated. With this change, emission 

control requirements that control the entire plant bulk production manufacturing operations 

are consolidated in SECTION D.14 and SECTION D.15: 

D.6.1 Standards for BPM Process Vents [40 CFR 63.1254, 326 IAC 2-2-3, and 326 IAC 8-5-3] 

The following streamlined standards for the BPM process operations satisfy the Maximum 

Achievable Control Technology Standards for Pharmaceutical Production Operations 

(Pharmaceutical MACT) for process vents [40 CFR 63.1254], Prevention of Significant 

Deterioration Best Available Control Technology (PSD BACT) requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3] and 

Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) requirements for synthesized pharmaceutical 

manufacturing operations [326 IAC 8-5-3]: 

(a) With the exception of Except as otherwise provided in Conditions D.6.1(c) and D.6.2, 

the emission limits and standards applicable for Permittee shall route the vapors from

each operating BPM process vent containing undiluted and uncontrolled process vent 

streams equal to or greater than 50 ppmv HAP 50 ppmv VOC or 15 pounds per day VOC 

through a closed-vent system to the RTO control system, The operation, inspection and 

maintenance requirements for the RTO control system, and its closed-vent system, used 

to control emissions from these emission units are described in Section D.14 of this 

permit. 

(13) The following conditions have been added to SECTION D.14 and SECTION D.15 to 

referenced the emission units controlled by the RTO and T79 fume incinerator control 

systems. 

D.14.0 Requirement to Control Emissions [40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb, 40 CFR 63 Subpart GGG, 40 

CFR 63 Subpart DD, 326 IAC 2-2-3, and 326 IAC 8-5-3] 

Except for equipment excluded from emission control requirements and except as 

otherwise provided by statute or rule, or in this permit, the fumes from all emission units 

which reference this section shall be continuously routed to the RTO control system while 

emission units vented to the control equipment are in operation. Except as otherwise 

provided by statute or rule, or in this permit, the RTO control system shall be operated at 

all times that the emission units vented to the control equipment are in operation. 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 37 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

D.15.0 Requirement to Control Emissions [40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb, 40 CFR 63 Subpart GGG, 40 

CFR 63 Subpart DD, 326 IAC 2-2-3, and 326 IAC 8-5-3] 

Except for equipment excluded from emission control requirements and except as 

otherwise provided by statute or rule, or in this permit, the fumes from all emission units 

which reference this section shall be continuously routed to the T79 control system while 

emission units vented to the control equipment are in operation. Except as otherwise 

provided by statute or rule, or in this permit, the T79 control system shall be operated at all 

times that the emission units vented to the control equipment are in operation. 

(14) The Permittee has requested the following change to Condition D.7.1, to avoid reporting 

multiple deviations from conditions that are interrelated. With this change, emission 

control requirements that control the entire plant bulk production manufacturing operations 

are consolidated in SECTION D.14 and SECTION D.15. 

D.7.1 Standards for BPM Support Process Vents [40 CFR 63.1254, CFR 63.690, 326 IAC 2-2-3, and 

326 IAC 8-5-3] 

The following streamlined standards for the BPM solvent recovery operations satisfy the 

Pharmaceutical MACT Standards for process vents [40 CFR 63.1254], OSWRO MACT Standards 

for process vents [40 CFR 63.690], PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3] and RACT 

requirements for synthesized pharmaceutical manufacturing operations [326 IAC 8-5-3]:

(a) With the exception of Except as otherwise provided in Condition D.7.1(c), the 

emission limits and standards for the Permitee shall route the vapors from each 

operating BPM process vent containing undiluted and uncontrolled process vent streams 

equal to or greater than 50 ppmv VOHAP and/or 50 ppmv VOC through a closed-vent 

system to either the RTO control system or T79 fume incinerator control system, The 

operation, inspection and maintenance requirements for the RTO control system and T79 

fume incinerator control system, and associated closed-vent systems, used to control 

emissions from these emission units are described in SECTION D.14 for emission units 

controlled by the RTO control system and described in SECTION D.15 for emission 

units controlled by the T79 fume incinerator control system and D.15 of this permit, 

respectively. 

(15) A sump was added in SECTION D.8 table that is regulated by the National Emission 

Standards of Hazardous Air Pollutants for Pharmaceutical Production Operations under 

40 CFR 63, Subpart GGG or NESHAP from Off-site Waste and Recovery Operations 

under 40 CFR 63, Subpart DD. 

SECTION D.8 ENTIRE PLANT BULK PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURING (BPM) PRODUCTION 

SUPPORT OPERATIONS – INDIVIDUAL DRAIN SYSTEM CONDITIONS

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The information describing the processes contained in the following facility description boxes is descriptive 

information and does not constitute enforceable conditions: 

The emission units listed below are subject to applicable requirements described or referred to in this D 

section. These sumps are defined as individual drain systems under the National Emission Standards of 

Hazardous Air Pollutants for Pharmaceutical Production Operations (Pharmaceutical MACT) found at 40 

CFR 63, Subpart GGG. 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 38 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

Unit ID Unit Description Stack/Vent Nominal 

Capacity 

Control 

Device 

Building T27: 

T27-Sump* Sump Tank/Lift Station RTO 2000 gal RTO 

Building T28: 

T28-Sump* Sump RTO 1300 gal RTO 

Building T31: 

T31-Sump* Sump RTO 5900 gal RTO 

Building T31A: 

T31A-Sump* Sump RTO 300 gal RTO 

Building T19:

T19-1-Sump* Sump None None 

Building T149: 

T149-TK782* IDS None 100 gal None 

* Emission units marked with an asterisk are insignificant activities as defined by 326 IAC 2-7-

1(21)(A)-(C). 

(16) The Permittee has requested the following change to Condition D.8.1, to avoid reporting 

multiple deviations from conditions that are interrelated. With this change, emission 

control requirements that control the entire plant bulk production manufacturing operations 

are consolidated in SECTION D.14 and SECTION D.15. 

D.8.1 BPM Individual Drain System (IDS) Standards [40 CFR 63.1256(e), 40 CFR 63.689(b), and 326 

IAC 2-2-3] 

The following streamlined standards for BPM IDSs satisfy the requirements of the Pharmaceutical 

MACT Standards for individual drain systems [40 CFR 63.1256(e)], OSWRO MACT Standards for 

transfer systems [40 CFR 63.689(b)], and PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3]: 

(b) Operational Standards: 

(1) The Permittee shall cover the openings of each operating BPM IDS containing 

waste equal to or greater than 500 parts per million by weight (ppmw) HAP and/or 

500 ppmw VOC at all times during use except when it is necessary to use the 

opening for sampling or removal of material, or for equipment inspection, 

maintenance, or repair; and 

(2) Except as otherwise provided in this Condition, the emission limits and 

standards for The Permittee shall route the vapors from each operating BPM 

IDS containing waste equal to or greater than 500 ppmw HAP and/or 500 ppmw 

VOC are described in SECTION D.14 for emission units controlled by the 

RTO control system and described in SECTION D.15 for emission units 

controlled by the T79 fume incinerator control system. through a closed-vent 

system to either the RTO control system or T79 fume incinerator control system,. 

 The operation, inspection and maintenance requirements for the RTO control 

system and T79 fume incinerator control system, and associated closed-vent 

systems, used to control emissions from these emission units are described in 

Sections D.14 and D.15 of this permit, respectively; or 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 39 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

(17) T143-16 tank has been deleted from Section D.9 equipment list, as shown below and has 

been added to SECTION D.10 equipment as a waste tank. 

SECTION D.9 ENTIRE PLANT BULK PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURING (BPM) PRODUCTION 

SUPPORT OPERATIONS – SOLVENT STORAGE TANK CONDITIONS 

Emission 

Unit ID 

Emission Unit 

Description Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity 

Control 

Device 

Building T143 – Tank Module: 

T143-TK01 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 38,245 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK03 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 38,245 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK05 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 38,245 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK07 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 38,245 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK09 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 38,245 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK11 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 38,245 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK12 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK13 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK14 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK16 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator

T143-TK17 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK18 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK19 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK20 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK21 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK22 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK23 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK24 Solvent Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

(18) An administrative amendment application has been submitted to IDEM, OAQ on February 

27, 2006. However, an amendment has never been issued. The following requests will 

be included in this proposed significant permit modification: 

 (a) In SECTION D.10 table, remove T143-08 because this tank has been permanently 

removed from service. 

 (b) Add T102-TK102 so that requirements will be incorporated in the Part 70 permit, and 

can be deleted from the RCRA permit. 

SECTION D.10 ENTIRE PLANT BULK PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURING (BPM) PRODUCTION 

SUPPORT OPERATIONS – WASTE TANK CONDITIONS

Facility Description [326 IAC 2-7-5(15)] 

The information describing the processes contained in the following facility description boxes is descriptive 

information and does not constitute enforceable conditions: 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 40 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

Emission 

Unit ID 

Emission Unit 

Description Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity 

Control 

Device 

Building T27: 

T27-TK53-10* Waste Tank RTO 500 gal RTO 

Building T28: 

T28-TK-28HW* Waste Tank RTO 250 gal RTO 

Building T29: 

T29-TK7902* Waste Tank RTO 1000 gal RTO 

Building T31:

T31-TK609* Waste Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

T31-TK669* Waste Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

Building T31A:

T31A-TK451K* Waste Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

T31A-TK688* Waste Tank RTO 125 gal RTO 

Building T99:

T99-TK-1B* Waste Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

T99-TK-7B* Waste Tank RTO 210 gal RTO 

T99-TK-8B* Waste Tank RTO 210 gal RTO 

T99-TK-D45A* Waste Tank RTO 100 gal RTO 

Building T100:

T100-TK-10A* Waste Tank RTO 200 gal RTO 

T100-TK-48* Waste Tank RTO 3300 gal RTO 

Building T79:

T79-TK301* Equalization Tank T79 - 321 stream 50,000 gal T79 Incinerator 

T79-TK302* Equalization Tank T79 - 321 stream 50,000 gal T79 Incinerator 

T79-TK303* Neutralization Tank T79 - 321 stream 5,000 gal T79 Incinerator 

Building T102-RTOs 

T102-TK102* 90 day RCRA Tank RTO 200 gal RTO 

Tank Module Building T140:

T140-TK3122 Waste Tank T79 Incinerator 38,425 gal T79 Incinerator 

T140-TK3123 Waste Tank T79 Incinerator 38,425 gal T79 Incinerator 

T140-TK3124 Waste Tank T79 Incinerator 38,425 gal T79 Incinerator 

T140-TK3125 Waste Tank T79 Incinerator 38,425 gal T79 Incinerator 

T140-TK3126 Waste Tank T79 Incinerator 38,425 gal T79 Incinerator 

T140-TK3227* Waste Tank T79 -324 stream 18,130 gal T79 Incinerator 

T140-TK3228* Waste Tank T79 - 324 stream 18,130 gal T79 Incinerator 

T140-TK3229* Waste Tank T79 - 324 stream 500 gal T79 Incinerator 

Tank Module Building T142: 

T142-TK01 Waste Tank T79 or RTO 19,500 gal T79 or RTO 

T142-TK02 Waste Tank T79 or RTO 19,500 gal T79 or RTO 

T142-TK03 Waste Tank T79 or RTO 19,500 gal T79 or RTO 

T142-TK04 Waste Tank T79 or RTO 19,500 gal T79 or RTO 

T142-TK05 Waste Tank T79 or RTO 19,500 gal T79 or RTO 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 41 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

Emission 

Unit ID 

Emission Unit 

Description Stack/Vent Nominal Capacity 

Control 

Device 

T142-TK06 Waste Tank T79 or RTO 19,500 gal T79 or RTO 

T142-TK07 Waste Tank T79 or RTO 19,500 gal T79 or RTO 

T142-TK08 Waste Tank T79 or RTO 19,500 gal T79 or RTO 

T142-TK09 Waste Tank T79 or RTO 19,500 gal T79 or RTO 

T142-TK10 Waste Tank T79 or RTO 19,500 gal T79 or RTO 

T142-TK11 Waste Tank T79 or RTO 19,500 gal T79 or RTO 

T142-TK12 Waste Tank T79 or RTO 19,500 gal T79 or RTO 

Tank Module Building T143: 

T143-TK02* Waste Tank T79 - 325 stream 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK06* Waste Tank T79 - 325 stream 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK08 Waste Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator

T143-TK10* Waste Tank T79 - 325 stream 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK15* Waste Tank T79 - 325 stream 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK16 Waste Tank T79 Incinerator 19,500 gal T79 Incinerator 

T143-TK56* Knock Out Pot T79 Incinerator 45 gal T79 Incinerator 

Tank Module Building T145:

T145-TK76* Knock Out Pot T79 Incinerator 45 gal T79 Incinerator 

T145-TK77* Knock Out Pot T79 Incinerator 45 gal T79 Incinerator 

Tank Module Building T146: 

T146-TK23 Waste Tank RTO 19,000 gal RTO 

T146-TK24 Waste Tank RTO 19,000 gal RTO 

T146-TK11* Waste Tank RTO 18,644 gal RTO 

T146-TK20* Waste Tank RTO 18,644 gal RTO 

T146-TK21* Waste Tank RTO 18,644 gal RTO 

T146-TK12 Waste Tank RTO 19,500 gal RTO 

T146-TK56* Knock Out Pot RTO 45 gal RTO 

T48 Tank Farm: 

T48-TK3207* Waste Tank T79 - 324 stream 102,759 gal T79 Incinerator 

T48-TK3208* Waste Tank T79 - 324 stream 102,759 gal T79 Incinerator 

T48-TK3209* Waste Tank T79 - 324 stream 102,759 gal T79 Incinerator 

T48-TK3211* Waste Tank T79 - 324 stream 260,650 gal T79 Incinerator 

T48-TK3212* Waste Tank T79 - 324 stream 260,650 gal T79 Incinerator 

* Emission units marked with a single asterisk are insignificant activities as defined in 326 IAC 2-7-1(21). 

 (19) The Permittee has requested the following change to Condition D.9.1, to avoid reporting 

multiple deviations from conditions that are interrelated. With this change, emission control 

requirements that control the entire plant bulk production manufacturing operations are 

consolidated in SECTION D.14 and SECTION D.15. 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 42 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

D.9.1 Standards for BPM Solvent Storage Tanks [40 CFR 63.1253(c)(1)(i), 40 CFR 60.112b and 

60.113b, 326 IAC 8-5-3, and 326 IAC 2-2] 

The following streamlined standards for the BPM solvent storage tanks satisfy the requirements of 

the Pharmaceutical MACT Standards for storage tanks [40 CFR 63.1253(c)(1)(i)], Volatile Organic 

Liquid Storage Vessel Standards [40 CFR 60.112b and 60.113b], PSD BACT requirements [326 

IAC 2-2-3] and RACT requirements for synthesized pharmaceutical manufacturing operations [326 

IAC 8-5-3]: 

(b) Operational Standards: 

(1) Except as otherwise provided in this Condition and in Condition D.9.2, T the 

Permittee shall route the vapors from each operating BPM solvent storage tank 

through a closed-vent system to either the RTO control system or the T79 fume 

incinerator control system, which are described in Section D.14 for equipment 

controlled by the RTO control system and described in Section D.15 for 

equipment controlled by the T79 fume incinerator control system. The 

operation, inspection and maintenance requirements for the RTO control system 

and T79 fume incinerator control system, and associated closed-vent systems, 

used to control emissions from these emission units are described in Sections 

D.14 and D.15 of this permit, respectively. 

(20) Condition D.9.3 has been changed to the following, since Section E.2 does not apply to 

the tanks in Section D.9: 

D.9.3 Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) Standards [40 CFR 63.1255 and 326 IAC 2-2] 

The LDAR standards that apply to components associated with the emission units listed in this 

section are described in Sections E.1 and E.2 of this permit. 

(21) The Permittee has requested the following change to Condition D.10.1, to avoid reporting 

multiple deviations from conditions that are interrelated. With this change, emission 

control requirements that control the entire plant bulk production manufacturing operations 

are consolidated in SECTION D.14 and SECTION D.15. 

D.10.1 Standards for BPM Waste Storage Tanks [40 CFR 63.1256(b), 40 CFR 63.685, 40 CFR 60.110b, 

326 IAC 2-2-3, and 326 IAC 8-5-3] 

The following streamlined standards for BPM waste storage tanks satisfy the requirements of the 

Pharmaceutical MACT Standards for wastewater tanks [40 CFR 63.1256(b)], Volatile Organic 

Liquid Storage Vessel Standards [40 CFR 60.110b], OSWRO MACT Standards for waste tanks 

[40 CFR 63.685], PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 2-2-3], and RACT requirements for 

synthesized pharmaceutical manufacturing operations [326 IAC 8-5-3]: 

(b) Operational Standards: 

(1) Except as otherwise provided in this Condition and in Condition D.10.2, T 

the Permittee shall route the vapors from each operating BPM waste storage tank 

through a closed-vent system to either the RTO control system or the T79 fume 

incinerator control system, which are described in Section D.14 for equipment 

controlled by the RTO control system and described in Section D.15 for 

equipment controlled by the T79 fume incinerator control system. The 

operation, inspection and maintenance requirements for the RTO control system 

and T79 fume incinerator control system, and associated closed-vent systems, 

used to control emissions from these emission units are described in Sections 

D.14 and D.15 of this permit, respectively. 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 43 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

(22) The LDAR Standards in Condition D.11.1(d) has been deleted, since the LDAR Standards 

do not apply to small BPM waste containers. However, LDAR Standards apply to the 

large BPM waste containers. Therefore, the Conditions D.11.1 and D.11.2 have been 

changed as follows: 

D.11.1 Standards for Small BPM Waste Containers [40 CFR 63.1256(d), 40 CFR 63.688, 326 IAC 2-2-3] 

The following streamlined standards for small BPM waste containers satisfy the requirements of 

the Pharmaceutical MACT Standards for wastewater containers [40 CFR 63.1256(d)], OSWRO 

MACT Standards for waste containers [40 CFR 63.688], and PSD BACT requirements [326 IAC 

2-2-3]: 

(a) Definition Standards: 

(1) A small BPM waste container is defined as any portable unit containing 

VOC/VOHAP material at concentrations greater than 500 ppmw with a storage 

capacity of greater than 0.1 cubic meters (26.4 gallons) and less than or equal to 

0.42 cubic meters (110.5 gallons). 

(b) Operational Standards: 

(1) The cover and all openings on each BPM waste container shall be maintained in 

the closed position, except when adding material, removing material, accessing 

material for non-transfer-related routine activities, openings caused from a 

pressure relief device, or opening of a safety device. 

(2) Each BPM waste container containing VOC/VOHAP shall meet existing 

Department of Transportation (DOT) specifications and testing requirements 

under 49 CFR 178. 

(c) Inspection Standards: 

(1) Initial and semiannual visual inspections shall be conducted for improper work 

practices and control equipment failures. 

(2) Inspections that are unsafe or difficult to inspect are not subject to the inspection 

requirements of D.11.1(c)(1). 

(3) The Permittee shall attempt to repair any defect within 24 hours after detection of 

the defective container and complete the repair within 5 calendar days after 

detection. If repair of a defect cannot be completed within 5 calendar days, then 

the waste shall be removed from the container and the container shall not be 

used to manage waste until the defect is repaired. 

(d) The LDAR standards that apply to the components associated with the emission units 

listed in this section are described in Section E.2.

D.11.2 Standards for Large BPM Waste Containers [40 CFR 63.1256(d), 40 CFR 63.688, 326 IAC 2-2-3, 

326 IAC 2-7-24] 

The following standards represent the streamlined requirements of the Pharmaceutical MACT 

Standards under 40 CFR 63.1256(d), OSWRO MACT Standards under 40 CFR 63.688, and Best 

Available Control Technology (BACT) requirements under 326 IAC 2-2-3: 

(a) Definition Standards: 

(1) A large BPM waste container is defined as any portable unit containing 

VOC/VOHAP material at concentrations greater than 500 ppmw with a storage 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 44 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

capacity of greater than 0.42 cubic meters (110.5 gallons). 

(b) Operational Standards: 

(1) The cover and all openings on each large BPM waste container shall be 

maintained in the closed position, and without leaks, except when adding 

material, removing material, accessing material for non-transfer-related routine 

activities, opening from a pressure relief device, and opening of a safety device. 

(2) A submerged fill pipe shall be used when pumping BPM liquid waste into a large 

BPM waste container. The submerged fill pipe outlet shall extend to no more 

than 6 inches or within two fill pipe diameters of the bottom of the container while 

the container is being filled. 

(c) Inspection Standards: 

(1) One-time Method 21 inspections shall be conducted on each new large BPM 

waste container within 150 days upon first onsite usage. 

(2) Initial and semiannual visual inspections shall be conducted for: 

(A) Improper work practices; 

(B) Control equipment failures; and 

(C) Visible, audible, or olfactory indications of leaks. 

(3) Inspections that are unsafe or difficult to inspect are not subject to the inspection 

requirements of D.11.2(c)(1) and (2). 

(4) The Permittee shall attempt to repair any defect within 24 hours after detection of 

the defective container and complete the repair within 5 calendar days after 

detection. If repair of a defect cannot be completed within 5 calendar days, then 

the waste shall be removed from the container and the container shall not be 

used to manage waste until the defect is repaired. 

 

(d) The LDAR standards that apply to the components associated with the emission 

units listed in this section are described in Section E.2. 

(23) Condition D.12.2(b) has been deleted, since the USEPA has approved the revised 

requirements of 326 IAC 4-2 into the SIP, which exempts waste combustors that are 

subject to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE: 

D.12.2 Particulate Matter Emission Standards [40 CFR 63.1203 and 326 IAC 4-2 40 CFR 52, Subpart P] 

Except for periods of startup, shutdown and malfunctions, the following emission standards shall 

apply at all times the T149 rotary kiln incinerator is operating:

(a) In order to satisfy the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1203(a)(7)] and the approved 

Indiana State Implementation Plan (SIP) applicable to incinerators [40 CFR 52, Subpart 

P], the particulate matter (PM) emissions from the T49 liquid waste incinerator stack 

exhaust shall not exceed 34 milligrams per dry standard cubic meter (mg/dscm) (0.015 

grains per dry standard cubic feet (gr/dscf)), corrected to 7 percent oxygen. 

(b) In order to satisfy the approved SIP applicable to incinerators [40 CFR Part 52, Subpart 

P], the T49 liquid waste incinerator shall:

(1) Consist of primary and secondary chambers or the equivalent. The design and 

operation of this incinerator in accordance with the requirements of this section of 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 45 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

the permit is equivalent to the design and operation of a primary and secondary 

chamber,

(2) Be equipped with a primary burner unless burning wood products, 

(3) Comply with 326 IAC 5-1 and 326 IAC 2,

(4) Be maintained properly as specified by the manufacturer and approved by the 

commissioner. The issuance of this permit shall be considered approval by the 

commissioner,

(5) Be operated according to the manufacturer’s recommendations and only burn 

waste approved by the commissioner. The issuance of this permit shall be 

considered approval by the commissioner,

(6) Comply with other state and/or local rules or ordinances regarding installation and 

operation of incinerators,

(7) Be operated so that emissions of hazardous material including, but not limited to, 

viable pathogenic bacteria, dangerous chemicals or gases, or noxious odors are 

prevented,

(8) Not emit particulate matter in excess of three-tenths (0.3) pounds of particulate 

matter per one thousand (1,000) pounds of dry exhaust gas at standard 

conditions corrected to fifty percent (50%) excess air, and

(9) Not create a nuisance or a fire hazard.

If any of the above result, the burning shall be terminated immediately.

The terms of Condition D.12.2 (b) will no longer apply upon USEPA approval of the 

revised requirements of 326 IAC 4-2 (26 Ind. Reg. 1071) into the SIP because the T49 

liquid waste incinerator is subject to 40 CFR 63, Subpart EEE. 

(24) The following Condition D.12.5(g) has been added to incorporate Operating Parameter 

Limits (OPLs) for the T49 Incinerator, established during performance tests done on 

August 10 through 12, 2004: 

D.12.5 Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP) and Fluoride Emission Standards [40 CFR 63.1203 and 

 326 IAC 2-2-3] 

(g) Operating Parameter Limits – In order to comply with the NESHAP for Hazardous 

Waste Combustors (HWC) emission limits described in this condition, the operating 

parameters of the T49 Incinerator, as established during the performance tests 

done on August 10 through 12, 2004, shall not exceed limits described below as 

maximum limits or fail to achieve limits described as minimum limits. 

Operating Parameter Limit Units Averaging 

Period 

Demonstrates 

Compliance 

for: 

Minimum Atomizing 

Air Media Pressure 60 psig 1-HR RA D.12.5(f) 

Maximum Primary 

Waste Feed Viscosity 460 centipoise NA D.12.5(f) 

Maximum Secondary 

Waste Feed Viscosity 460 centipoise NA D.12.5(f) 

Maximum Primary 

Waste Feed Rate 7,117 lbs/hr 1-HR RA D.12.5(e) 

D.12.5(f) 

Maximum Secondary 18,326 lbs/hr 1-HR RA D.12.5(e) 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 46 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

Operating Parameter Limit Units Averaging 

Period 

Demonstrates 

Compliance 

for: 

Waste Feed Rate D.12.5(f) 

Minimum Combustion 

 Temperature 1,850 o

F 1-HR RA D.12.5(e) 

D.12.5(f) 

Maximum 

Combustion Air Flow 

Rate 

15,022 acfm 1-HR RA 

D.12.5(a) 

D.12.5(b) 

D.12.5(c) 

D.12.5(d) 

D.12.5(e) 

D.12.5(f) 

Maximum Mercury 

Feed Rate 0.0042 lbs/hr 12-hr RA D.12.5(a) 

Maximum SemiVolatile Metals (SVM) 

Feed Rate 

0.21 lbs/hr 12-hr RA D.12.5(b) 

Maximum LowVolatile Metals (LVM) 

Feed Rate 

0.30 lbs/hr 12-hr RA D.12.5(c) 

Maximum Ash Feed 

Rate 1,710 lbs/hr 12-hr RA D.12.2(a) 

Maximum Total 

Chlorine Feed Rate 3,690 lbs/hr 12-hr RA D.12.5(d) 

Minimum 

Condenser/Absorber 

Flow Rate 

600 gpm 1-HR RA 

D.12.5(a) 

D.12.5(b) 

D.12.5(c) 

D.12.5(d) 

Minimum Differential 

Pressure across 

Condenser/Absorber 

0.5 in.w.c 1-HR RA 

D.12.5(a) 

D.12.5(b) 

D.12.5(c) 

D.12.5(d) 

Minimum Hydro-Sonic 

Scrubber Flow Rate 290 gpm 1-HR RA 

D.12.2(a) 

D.12.5(a) 

D.12.5(b) 

D.12.5(c) 

D.12.5(d) 

Minimum Hydro-Sonic 

Equivalent Differential 

Pressure 

75 in.w.c 1-HR RA 

D.12.2(a) 

D.12.5(a) 

D.12.5(b) 

D.12.5(c) 

D.12.5(d) 

Minimum 

Condenser/Absorber 

pH 

4.9 S.U. 1-HR RA D.12.5(d) 

Maximum 

Condenser/Absorber 

% Solids 

3.5 %TDS 12-hr RA 

D.12.2(a) 

D.12.5(a) 

D.12.5(b) 

D.12.5(c) 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 47 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

(25) Condition D.12.6(b) has been deleted, since the USEPA has approved the revised 

requirements of 326 IAC 9-1 into the SIP, which exempts sources with Carbon Monoxide 

emissions limit under the NESHAP rule. The T49 Liquid Waste Incinerator is subject to 

NESHAP, Subpart EEE: 

D.12.6 Carbon Monoxide (CO) Emission Standards [326 IAC 2-2-3, 40 CFR Part 52, Subpart P, 326 IAC 

9-1, and 40 CFR 63.1203] 

(b) In order to satisfy the carbon monoxide emission limitations in the approved SIP [40 CFR 

Part 52, Subpart P], the Permittee shall control carbon monoxide emissions in a direct 

flame afterburner or other controls approved by the Commissioner. Compliance with the 

emission limits described in D.12.6 (a) constitutes an approved control methodology. The 

terms of Condition D.12.6 (b) will no longer apply upon USEPA approval of the revised 

requirements of 326 IAC 9-1-2 into the SIP because the T49 liquid waste incinerator is 

subject to 40 CFR 63, Subpart EEE. 

(26) Condition D.12.15 has been changed to the following to reference Operating Parameter 

Limits for the T49 Incinerator given in D.12.5. 

D.12.15 Parametric Continuous Monitoring Systems (CMS) Requirements [40 CFR 63.8(c), 40 CFR 

63.1209, and 326 IAC 2-1.1-11] 

(a) The Permittee shall operate the following CMSs to monitor the Operating Parameter 

Limits (OPLs) listed in D.12.5(g) in accordance with the quality assurance requirements 

specified in 40 CFR 63.1209(d) at all times the T49 incinerator is in operation. To satisfy 

the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1209(b), (d), (e), (f) and (h)] and the requirements 

for PSD sources [326 IAC 2-1.1-11], the following parameters listed in D.12.5(g) shall be 

monitored at all times the T49 incinerator is in operation. In addition, the operating 

parameters monitored by the following CMSs shall not exceed the established operating 

parameter limits at all times the incinerator is burning waste.

(1) Dioxin/Furan CMS Requirements – Pursuant to the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 

63.1209(k)], the Permittee shall install and operate CMS monitors for the following 

parameters:

(A) Combustion Chamber Temperature - Minimum rolling hourly average 

combustion chamber temperature established from the average 

temperature measured during the three DRE test runs;

(B) Combustion Air Flow Rate - Maximum hourly rolling average combustion 

air flow rate established from the average of the maximum hourly rolling 

average for each performance test run; and 

(C) Primary Waste Feed Rate – Maximum hourly rolling average primary 

waste feed rate as established from the average of the maximum hourly 

rolling averages for each performance test run.

(D) Secondary Waste Feed Rate - Maximum hourly rolling average 

secondary waste feed rate as established from the average of the 

maximum hourly rolling averages for each performance test run.

(2) DRE Standard CMS Requirements – Pursuant to the HWC MACT standards [40 

CFR 63.1209(j)], the Permittee shall install and operate CMS monitors for those 

parameters identified in Condition D.12.15 (a)(1).

(3) Metals CMS Requirements – Pursuant to the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 

63.1209(l) and (n)], the Permittee shall install and operate CMS monitors for the 

following parameters:
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 48 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

(A) Waste Feed Rate - Maximum 12-hour rolling average feed rates for total 

Hg, semi-volatile metals (cadmium and lead) and low volatile metals 

(arsenic, beryllium, and chromium) in all waste feedstreams established 

from the average of the hourly rolling averages for each performance test 

run and approved extrapolation techniques;

(B) Scrubber Liquids Solid Content - Maximum 12-hour rolling average solids 

content of the scrubber liquid using a continuous monitoring system 

established from the average of the performance test run averages. This 

parameter does not apply to mercury;

(C) Hydro-SonicTM Scrubber equivalent Pressure Drop - Minimum hourly 

rolling average pressure drop across the Hydro-SonicTM scrubber 

established from the average of the performance test run averages;

(D) Scrubber Liquid Flow Rate - Minimum hourly rolling average scrubber 

liquid flow rate established from the average of the performance test run 

averages; and

(E) Flue Gas Flow Rate - Maximum hourly rolling average flue gas flow rate, 

the maximum production rate, or another surrogate parameter for gas 

residence time, established from the average of the maximum hourly 

rolling averages for each test run. 

(4) PM CMS Requirements – Pursuant to the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 

63.1209(m)], the Permittee shall install and operate CMS monitors for the 

following parameters:

(A) Those parameters identified in Condition D.12.15 (a)(3)(B), (C), and (D); 

and 

(B) Ash Feed Rate - Maximum 12-hour average ash feed rate established 

from the average of the test run averages. 

(5) HCl/Cl2 and Fluorides CMS Requirements – Pursuant to the HWC MACT 

standards [40 CFR 63.1209(o)] and compliance monitoring requirements for PSD 

sources [326 IAC 2-1.1-11], the Permittee shall install and operate CMS monitors 

for the following parameters:

(A) Those parameters identified in Condition D.12.15 (a)(3)(C), (D) and (E).

(B) Waste Feed Rate - Maximum 12-hour rolling average feed rates for 

chlorine (organic and inorganic) in all waste feedstreams established 

from the average of the performance test run averages. [40 CFR 

63.1209(o)(1)] 

(C) Scrubber Liquid pH - Minimum hourly rolling average scrubber liquid pH 

established from the average of the performance test run averages. [40 

CFR 63.1209(o)(3)(iv)]

(27) Condition D.13.2(b) has been deleted, since the USEPA has approved the revised 

requirements of 326 IAC 4-2 into the SIP, which exempts waste combustors that are 

subject to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE: 

D.13.2 Particulate Matter Emission Standards [40 CFR 63.1203 and 40 CFR 52, Subpart P] 

Except for periods of startup, shutdown and malfunctions, the following emission standards shall 

apply at all times the T149 rotary kiln incinerator is operating:
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 49 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

(a) In order to satisfy the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1203(b)(7)] and the approved 

Indiana State Implementation Plan (SIP) applicable to incinerators [40 CFR 52, Subpart

P], the particulate matter (PM) emissions from the T149 rotary kiln incinerator stack 

exhaust shall not exceed 34 mg/dscm (0.015 gr/dscf), corrected to 7 percent oxygen on a 

6-hour rolling average basis, updated every hour. 

(b) In order to satisfy the approved SIP applicable to incinerators [40 CFR Part 52, Subpart 

P], the T149 rotary kiln incinerator shall:

(1) Consist of primary and secondary chambers or the equivalent. The design and 

operation of this incinerator in accordance with the requirements of this section of 

the permit is equivalent to the design and operation of a primary and secondary 

chamber.

(2) Be equipped with a primary burner unless burning wood products, 

(3) Comply with 326 IAC 5-1 and 326 IAC 2,

(4) Be maintained properly as specified by the manufacturer and approved by the 

commissioner. The issuance of this permit shall be considered approval by the 

commissioner.

(5) Be operated according to the manufacturer’s recommendations and only burn 

waste approved by the commissioner. The issuance of this permit shall be 

considered approval by the commissioner.

(6) Comply with other state and/or local rules or ordinances regarding installation and 

operation of incinerators,

(7) Be operated so that emissions of hazardous material including, but not limited to, 

viable pathogenic bacteria, dangerous chemicals or gases, or noxious odors are 

prevented,

(8) Not emit particulate matter in excess of three-tenths (0.3) pounds of particulate 

matter per one thousand (1,000) pounds of dry exhaust gas at standard 

conditions corrected to fifty percent (50%) excess air, and

(9) Not create a nuisance or a fire hazard.

If any of the above result, the burning shall be terminated immediately.

The terms of Condition D.13.2 (b)(2) will no longer apply upon USEPA approval of the revised 

requirements of 326 IAC 4-2 (26 Ind. Reg. 1071) into the SIP because the T149 rotary kiln 

incinerator is subject to 40 CFR 63, Subpart EEE. 

(28) Condition D.13.5 has been changed to the following to incorporate the Alternative 

Monitoring Petition (AMP) that was approved by the US EPA on January 27, 2006, and to 

incorporate Operating Parameter Limits (OPLs) for the T149 Rotary Kiln Incinerator, 

established during performance tests done on September 20 and 21, 2005: 

D.13.5 Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP) Emission Standards [40 CFR 63.1203, US EPA approved

Alternative Monitoring Petition initially approved January 27, 2006] 

Except for periods of startup, shutdown and malfunctions, the following emission standards shall 

apply at all times the T149 rotary kiln incinerator is operating:
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 50 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

(a) Mercury – Pursuant to the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1203(b)(2)], the mercury 

emissions from the T149 rotary kiln incinerator stack exhaust shall not exceed 45 

ug/dscm, corrected to 7% oxygen on a 12-hour rolling average basis, from block 

hourly averages. 

(b) Lead and Cadmium – Pursuant to the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1203(b)(3)], the 

total semi-volatile metals (lead and cadmium) emissions from the T149 rotary kiln 

incinerator stack exhaust shall not exceed 120 ug/dscm, corrected to 7 percent oxygen on 

a 12-hour rolling average basis, from block hourly averages. 

(c) Arsenic, Beryllium, and Chromium – Pursuant to the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 

63.1203(b)(4)], the total low volatile metals (arsenic, beryllium, and chromium) emissions 

from the T149 rotary kiln incinerator stack exhaust shall not exceed 97 ug/dscm, corrected 

to 7 percent oxygen on a 12-hour rolling average basis, from block hourly averages. 

(d) Hydrochloric Acid/Chlorine Gas (HCl/Cl2) and Fluorides - In order to satisfy the HWC 

MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1203(b)(6)], the HCl/Cl2 emissions from the T149 rotary kiln 

incinerator stack exhaust shall not exceed 21 ppmvdc, expressed as HCl equivalent on a 

12-hour rolling average basis, from block hourly averages. In order to satisfy the 

PSD BACT requirements for fluorides [326 IAC 2-2-3], the T149 liquid waste incinerator 

control system shall achieve a HCl control efficiency of 98 percent or greater. 

(e) Dioxin/Furans – Pursuant to HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1203(b)(1)], the 

dioxin/furan emissions from the T149 rotary kiln incinerator stack exhaust shall not exceed 

0.20 ng TEQ/dscm, corrected to 7 percent oxygen. 

(f) Principle Organic Hazardous Constituents (POHCs) – Pursuant to the HWC MACT 

standards [40 CFR 63.1203(c)(1) and (2)], the Permittee shall comply with the following 

requirements: 

(1) The destruction and removal efficiency (DRE) for each principle organic 

hazardous constituent (POHC), excluding dioxin-listed hazardous wastes F020, 

F021, F022, F023, F026, or F027 shall be at least 99.99 percent. 

(2) Dioxin-listed hazardous wastes F020, F021, F022, F023, F026, or F027 shall not 

be burned in the T149 rotary kiln incinerator. 

(g) Operating Parameter Limits – In order to comply with the NESHAP from Hazardous 

Waste Combustors (HWC) emission limits in this condition, the operating 

parameters of the T149 Rotary Kiln Incinerator, as established during the 

performance tests done on September 20 and 21, 2005, and associated emission 

control equipment shall not exceed limits described below as maximum limits or 

fail to achieve limits described as minimum limits. 

The limits below are applicable when monitoring is required by D.13.15(a). 

Operating Parameter Limit Averaging 

Period 

Operating 

Limit Units 

Maximum Primary Waste Feed to Primary 

Combustion Chamber 1-hr RA1

 1,501 lbs/hr 

Maximum Secondary Waste Feed to Primary 

Combustion Chamber 1-hr RA1

 4,655 lbs/hr 

Maximum Solid Feed Rate 1-hr RA1 5,529 lbs/hr 

Minimum Primary Combustion Chamber 

Temperature 1-hr RA1

 1,598 oF 

Maximum Primary Waste Feed to Secondary 

Combustion Chamber 1-hr RA1

 1,801 lbs/hr 

Maximum Secondary Waste Feed to Secondary 1-hr RA1 1,440 lbs/hr 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 51 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

Operating Parameter Limit Averaging 

Period 

Operating 

Limit Units 

Combustion Chamber 

Minimum Secondary Combustion Chamber 

Temperature 1-hr RA1

 1,809 oF 

Maximum Stack Gas Flow Rate 1-hr RA1 18,812 dscfm 

Maximum Waste Feed Viscosity Monthly 

Analysis 460 Centi-poise

Minimum Waste Atomizing Pressure 1-hr RA1 75 psig 

Maximum Mercury Feed Rate in all Feed Streams 12-hr RA 0.0038 lbs/hr 

Maximum SVM Feed Rate in all Feed Streams 12-hr RA 3.2 lbs/hr 

Maximum LVM Feed Rate in all Feed Streams 12-hr RA 490 lbs/hr 

Maximum LVM feed rate in all Pumpable Feed 

Streams 12-hr RA 5.0 lbs/hr 

Maximum ash feed rate in all feed streams 12-hr RA 4,168 lbs/hr 

Maximum Total Chlorine feed rate in all feed streams 12-hr RA 1,977 lbs/hr 

Minimum Condenser/Absorber pressure drop 1-hr RA 1 in w.c. 

Minimum Condenser/Absorber liquid feed pressure 1-hr RA 5 psig 

Minimum Condenser/Absorber scrubber water pH 1-hr RA 2.5 pH 

Minimum Condenser/Absorber scrubber liquid flow 

rate 1-hr RA 980 gpm 

Minimum Hydro-Sonic Scrubber Equivalent Pressure 

Drop 1-hr RA 53 in w.c. 

Maximum Hydro-Sonic Scrubber conductivity 12-hr RA 2.3 % solids 

Minimum Hydro-Sonic Scrubber Liquid Feed Rate 1-hr RA 286 gpm 

Minimum Hydro-Sonic Scrubber water pH 1-hr RA 2.5 pH 

1. CMS shall be operated as described in D.13.15. 

(29) Condition D.13.6(b) has been deleted, since the USEPA has approved the revised 

requirements of 326 IAC 9-1 into the SIP, which exempts sources with Carbon Monoxide 

emissions limit under the NESHAP rule. The T149 Rotary Kiln Incinerator is subject to 

NESHAP, Subpart EEE: 

D.13.6 Carbon Monoxide (CO) Emission Standards [326 IAC 2-2-3, 40 CFR Part 52, Subpart P 326 IAC 

9-1, and 40 CFR 63.1203] 

(b) In order to satisfy the CO emission limitations in the approved State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) [40 CFR Part 52, Subpart P], the Permittee shall control carbon monoxide 

emissions in a direct flame afterburner or other controls approved by the Commissioner. 

Compliance with the emission limits described in D.13.6 (a) constitutes an approved 

control methodology. The terms of Condition D.13.6 (b) will no longer apply upon USEPA 

approval of the revised requirements of 326 IAC 9-1-2 into the SIP because the T149 

rotary kiln incinerator is subject to 40 CFR 63, Subpart EEE. 

(30) Condition D.13.14 has been changed to the following, to incorporate the Alternative 

Monitoring Petition (AMP) that was approved by the US EPA on January 27, 2006: 

D.13.14 Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) Operating Requirements [40 CFR 60, 

Appendix B and Appendix F, 40 CFR 63.8, 326 IAC 2-1.1-11, 326 IAC 3-5, Alternative 

Monitoring Petition initially approved January 27, 2006] 

(a) CO and O2 CEMS Operation Requirements – The following requirements shall be applied 

at all times the T149 rotary kiln incinerator is in operation and represent the streamlined 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 52 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

requirements of the HWC MACT standards for CO and HC [40 CFR 63.1209(a), (d), (e), 

(f), and (h)], PSD BACT requirements for CO and VOC [326 IAC 2-1.1-11], and the 

emission monitoring requirements for MACT and PSD sources [326 IAC 3-5-1(b) and (d)]: 

(1) The Permittee shall install and operate the CO and O2 CEMS in accordance with 

the QA requirements of the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63, Appendix to 

Subpart EEE], the applicable QC and performance evaluation requirements of 40 

CFR 63.1209(d), and the applicable performance specification requirements of 40 

CFR 60, Appendix B, and the Alternative Monitoring Petition (“AMP”) initially 

approved on January 27, 2006 and all subsequent revisions to the AMP. 

(2) The CEMS shall be installed and operational upon certification of the DOC for the 

HWC MACT. 

(3) Continuous operation is defined as the collection of at least one measurement for 

each successive 15-second period, regardless of startup, shutdown and 

malfunction. 

(b) SO2 and NOx CEMS Operation Requirements – The following requirements shall apply 

when the T149 rotary kiln incinerator is burning waste: 

(1) The Permittee shall install and operate the SO2 and NOx CEMS in accordance 

with the QA/QC criteria set forth in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B, and 40 CFR 60, 

Appendix F, Procedure 1, and the AMP approved on January 27, 2006. 

(2) Continuous operation is defined as the collection of at least one measurement for 

each successive 15-minute period. 

(3) The Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction (SSM) Plan required by Condition 

D.13.12 (b) shall include procedures for monitoring and recording the following 

information during times of SO2 or NOx CEMS malfunction: 

(A) When the SO2 CEMS malfunctions, the Permittee shall monitor and 

record the Hydro-SonicTM equivalent pressure drop and scrubber liquid 

flow rate as required by Condition D.13.15 (a)(3)(C) and (D) and the 

scrubber liquid pH as required by Condition D.13.15 (a)(5)(C). 

(B) When the NOx CEMS malfunctions, the Permittee shall monitor and 

record the combustion chamber temperature, combustion air flow rate, 

and primary and secondary waste feed rates as required by Condition 

D.13.15 (a)(1), and assess NOx emissions, using waste testing, waste 

shipment and process knowledge, to determine whether the quantity of 

nitrogen fed into the incinerator during that time could have exceeded the 

worst case 24-hour daily average nitrogen feed rate of 1,379 pounds per 

hour that formed the basis of the NOx BACT limit. 

(c) Particulate Matter [PM] CEMS Alternative Operating Scenario Requirements – 

This permit provides the Permittee with the following Alternative Operating 

Scenario for purposes of satisfying the monitoring requirements of 40 CFR 63.1209. 

 The Permittee shall operate the PM CEMS at all times the T149 Incinerator is in 

operation, except as provided in paragraphs (3) or (4) below. 

(1) The Permittee shall install and operate the PM CEMS in accordance with the 

QA/QC criteria set forth the AMP approved on January 27, 2006, and all 

subsequent revisions to the AMP. 

(2) Continuous operation is defined as the collection of at least one 

measurement for each successive 15-minute period. In order to calculate a 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 53 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

valid one-hour block average, valid results must be available for at least 

three of the four 15-minute cycles in each hour. 

(3) During periods when the PM CEMS is malfunctioning or inoperative, the 

Permittee may use data from the Multi-Metal CEMS, as provided in the AMP 

approved January 27, 2006 and all subsequent revisions to the AMP. 

(4) In lieu of operating the PM CEMS, the Permittee may satisfy the monitoring 

requirements of 40 CFR 63.1209 through operation of the Continuous 

Monitoring System requirements described in Section D.13.15(a). 

(d) Multi-Metals [MMX] CEMS Alternative Operating Scenario Requirements – 

This permit provides the Permittee with the following Alternative Operating 

Scenario for purposes of satisfying the monitoring requirements of 40 CFR 63.1209. 

The Permittee shall operate the MMX CEMS at all times the T149 Incinerator is in 

operation, except as provided in paragraphs (3) or (4) below. 

(1) The Permittee shall install and operate the MMX CEMS in accordance with 

the QA/QC criteria set forth the AMP approved on January 27, 2006, and all 

subsequent revisions to the AMP. 

(2) Continuous operation is defined as the collection of at least one 

measurement for each successive 15-minute period. In order to calculate a 

valid one-hour block average, valid results must be available for at least 

three of the four 15-minute cycles in each hour. 

(3) During periods when the MMX CEMS is malfunctioning or inoperative, the 

Permittee may use data from the PM CEMS, as provided in the AMP 

approved on January 27, 2006 and all subsequent revisions to the AMP.. 

(4) In lieu of operating the MMX CEMS, the Permittee may satisfy the 

monitoring requirements of 40 CFR 63.1209 through operation of the 

Continuous Monitoring System requirements described in Section 

D.13.15(a). 

(e) Hydrogen Chloride [HCl] CEMS Alternative Operating Scenario Requirements – 

This permit provides the Permittee with the following Alternative Operating 

Scenario for purposes of satisfying the monitoring requirements of 40 CFR 63.1209. 

The Permittee shall operate the HCl CEMS at all times the T149 Incinerator is in 

operation, except as provided in paragraphs (3) or (4) below. 

(1) The Permittee shall install and operate the HCl CEMS in accordance with 

the QA/QC criteria set forth the AMP approved on January 27, 2006, and all 

subsequent revisions to the AMP. 

(2) Continuous operation is defined as the collection of at least one 

measurement for each successive 15-minute period. 

(3) In lieu of operating the HCl CEMS, the Permittee may satisfy the monitoring 

requirements of 40 CFR 63.1209 through operation of the Continuous

Monitoring System requirements described in Section D.13.15(a). 

(31) Condition D.13.15, Parametric Continuous Monitoring Systems (CMS) Requirements has 

been changed to the following: 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 54 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

D.13.15 Parametric Continuous Monitoring Systems (CMS) Requirements [40 CFR 63.8(c), 40 CFR 

63.1209, and 326 IAC 2-1.1-11] 

(a) The Permittee shall operate the following CMSs in accordance with the quality assurance 

requirements specified in 40 CFR 63.1209(d) at all times the T149 incinerator is in 

operation. To satisfy the HWC MACT standards [40 CFR 63.1209(b), (d), (e), (f), and (h)] 

and the requirements for PSD sources [326 IAC 2-1.1-11], the following parameters shall 

be monitored at all times the T149 incinerator is in operation. In addition, the operating 

parameters monitored by the following CMSs shall not exceed the established operating 

parameter limits at all times incinerators are burning waste:. The permittee shall operate

the CMS as provided in the table below. The CEMS mode is when the HCl CEMS, 

and either the PM and/or the Metal CEMS are in operation in accordance with 

Condition D.13.14. If the permittee is not operating in CEMS mode, then the CMS in 

the Parametric Mode must be monitored. 

Operating Parameter 

Monitor 

when in 

CMS 

Parametric 

Mode 

Monitor 

when in 

CEMS 

Mode 

Averaging 

Period Units Parameter for: 

Maximum Primary Waste 

Feed to Primary 

Combustion Chamber 

X X 1-hr RA lbs/hr D.13.5(e) 

D.13.5(f) 

Maximum Secondary 

Waste Feed to Primary 

Combustion Chamber 

X X 1-hr RA lbs/hr D.13.5(e) 

D.13.5(f) 

Maximum Solid Feed 

Rate X X 1-hr RA lbs/hr D.13.5(e) 

D.13.5(f) 

Minimum Primary 

Combustion Chamber 

Temperature 

X X 1-hr RA o

F D.13.5(e) 

D.13.5(f) 

Maximum Primary Waste 

Feed to Secondary 

Combustion Chamber 

X X 1-hr RA lbs/hr D.13.5(e) 

D.13.5(f) 

Maximum Secondary 

Waste Feed to 

Secondary Combustion 

Chamber 

X X 1-hr RA lbs/hr D.13.5(e) 

D.13.5(f) 

Minimum Secondary 

Combustion Chamber 

Temperature 

X X 1-hr RA o

F D.13.5(e) 

D.13.5(f) 

Maximum Stack Gas 

Flow Rate X X 1-hr RA dscfm 

D.13.5(a) 

D.13.5(b) 

D.13.5(c) 

D.13.5(d) 

D.13.5(e) 

D.13.5(f) 

Maximum waste feed 

viscosity X X Monthly 

Analysis 

Centipoise D.13.5(f) 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 55 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

Operating Parameter 

Monitor 

when in 

CMS 

Parametric 

Mode 

Monitor 

when in 

CEMS 

Mode 

Averaging 

Period Units Parameter for: 

Minimum Waste 

Atomizing Pressure X X 1-hr RA psig D.13.5(f) 

Maximum Particulate 

Matter (PM) limit X 6-hr RA mg/dscm D.13.2(a) 

Maximum HCl/Cl2

emissions X 12-hr RA ppmv D.13.5(d) 

Maximum Mercury 

Emissions X 12-hr RA ug/dscm D.13.5(a) 

Maximum SVM 

emissions X 12-hr RA ug/dscm D.13.5(b) 

Maximum LVM 

Emissions X 12-hr RA ug/dscm D.13.5(c) 

Maximum mercury feed 

rate in all feed streams X 12-hr RA lbs/hr D.13.5(a) 

Maximum SVM feed rate 

in all feed streams X 12-hr RA lbs/hr D.13.5(b) 

Maximum LVM feed rate 

in all feed streams X 12-hr RA lbs/hr D.13.5(c) 

Maximum LVM feed rate 

in all pumpable feed 

streams 

X 12-hr RA lbs/hr D.13.5(c) 

Maximum ash feed rate 

in all feed streams X 12-hr RA lbs/hr D.13.2(a) 

Maximum Total Chlorine 

feed rate in all feed 

streams 

X 12-hr RA lbs/hr D.13.5(d) 

Minimum 

Condenser/Absorber 

pressure drop 

X 1-hr RA in w.c. 

D.13.5(a) 

D.13.5(b) 

D.13.5(c) 

D.13.5(d) 

Minimum 

Condenser/Absorber 

liquid feed pressure 

X 1-hr RA psig 

D.13.5(a) 

D.13.5(b) 

D.13.5(c) 

D.13.5(d) 

Minimum 

Condenser/Absorber 

scrubber water pH 

X 1-hr RA pH D.13.5(d) 

Minimum 

Condenser/Absorber 

scrubber liquid flow rate 

X 1-hr RA gpm 

D.13.5(a) 

D.13.5(b) 

D.13.5(c) 

D.13.5(d) 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 56 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

Operating Parameter 

Monitor 

when in 

CMS 

Parametric 

Mode 

Monitor 

when in 

CEMS 

Mode 

Averaging 

Period Units Parameter for: 

Minimum Hydro-Sonic 

Scrubber Equivalent 

Pressure Drop 

X 1-hr RA in w.c. 

D.13.2(a) 

D.13.5(a) 

D.13.5(b) 

D.13.5(c) 

D.13.5(d) 

Maximum Hydro-Sonic 

Scrubber conductivity X 12-hr RA % solids 

D.13.2(a) 

D.13.5 (a) 

D.13.5(b) 

D.13.5(c) 

Minimum Hydro-Sonic 

Scrubber Liquid Feed 

Rate 

X 1-hr RA gpm 

D.13.2(a) 

D.13.5(a) 

D.13.5(b) 

D.13.5(c) 

D.13.5(d) 

Minimum Hydro-Sonic 

Scrubber water pH X 1-hr RA pH D.13.5(d) 

(1) Dioxin/Furan CMS Requirements – Pursuant to the HWC MACT standards [40 

CFR 63.1209(k)], the Permittee shall install and operate CMS monitors for the 

following parameters:

(A) Combustion Chamber Temperature - Minimum rolling hourly average 

combustion chamber temperature established from the average 

temperature measured during the three DRE test runs;

(B) Flue Gas Flow Rate - Maximum hourly rolling average flue gas flow rate 

established from the average of the maximum hourly rolling average for 

each performance test run; and 

(C) Primary Waste Feed Rate – Maximum hourly rolling average primary 

waste feed rate as established from the average of the maximum hourly 

rolling averages for each performance test run.

(D) Secondary Waste Feed Rate - Maximum hourly rolling average 

secondary waste feed rate as established from the average of the 

maximum hourly rolling averages for each performance test run.

(2) DRE Standard CMS Requirements – Pursuant to the HWC MACT standards [40 

CFR 63.1209(j)], the Permittee shall install and operate CMS monitors for those 

parameters identified in Condition D.13.16 (a)(1).

(3) Metals CMS Requirements – This permit provides the Permittee with the following 

Alternative Operating Scenario for purposes of satisfying the monitoring 

requirements of 40 CFR 63.1209. Pursuant to the HWC MACT standards [40 

CFR 63.1209(l) and (n)], if the Permittee is not operating the MMX or PM CEMS 

pursuant to Condition D.13.14(d), the Permittee shall install and operate CMS 

monitors for the following parameters:

(A) Waste Feed Rate - Maximum 12-hour rolling average feed rates for total 

Hg, semi-volatile metals (cadmium and lead) and low volatile metals 

(arsenic, beryllium, and chromium) in all waste feedstreams established 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 57 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

from the average of the hourly rolling averages for each performance test 

run and approved extrapolation techniques;

(B) Scrubber Liquids Solid Content - Maximum 12-hour rolling average solids 

content of the scrubber liquid using a continuous monitoring system 

established from the average of the performance test run averages. This 

parameter does not apply to mercury;

(C) Hydro-SonicTM Equivalent Pressure Drop - Minimum hourly rolling 

average pressure drop across the Hydro-SonicTM scrubber established 

from the average of the performance test run averages;

(D) Scrubber Liquid Flow Rate - Minimum hourly rolling average scrubber 

liquid flow rate established from the average of the performance test run 

averages; and

(E) Flue Gas Flow Rate - Maximum hourly rolling average flue gas flow rate, 

the maximum production rate, or another surrogate parameter for gas 

residence time, established from the average of the maximum hourly 

rolling averages for each test run. 

(4) PM CMS Requirements – This permit provides the Permittee with the following 

Alternative Operating Scenario for purposes of satisfying the monitoring 

requirements of 40 CFR 63.1209. Pursuant to the HWC MACT standards [40 

CFR 63.1209(m)], if the Permittee is not operating the PM or MMX CEMS 

pursuant to Condition D.13.14(c), the Permittee shall install and operate CMS 

monitors for the following parameters:

(A) Those parameters identified in Condition D.13.15(a)(3)(B), (C), and (D); 

and 

(B) Ash Feed Rate - Maximum 12-hour average ash feed rate established 

from the average of the test run averages. 

(5) HCl/Cl2 and Fluorides CMS Requirements – This permit provides the Permittee 

with the following Alternative Operating Scenario for purposes of satisfying the 

monitoring requirements of 40 CFR 63.1209. Pursuant to the HWC MACT 

standards [40 CFR 63.1209(o)] and compliance monitoring requirements for PSD 

sources [326 IAC 2-1.1-11], if the Permittee is not operating the HCL CEMS 

pursuant to Condition D.13.14(e), the Permittee shall install and operate CMS 

monitors for the following parameters:

(A) Those parameters identified in Condition D.13.16 (a)(3)(C), (D) and (E).

(B) Waste Feed Rate - Maximum 12-hour rolling average feed rates for 

chlorine (organic and inorganic) in all waste feedstreams established 

from the average of the performance test run averages. [40 CFR 

63.1209(o)(1)] 

(C) Scrubber Liquid pH - Minimum hourly rolling average scrubber liquid pH 

established from the average of the performance test run averages. [40 

CFR 63.1209(o)(3)(iv)]
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 58 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

(32) The following condition has been added in Condition D.13.18(a) and was numbered (14). 

D.13.18 Record keeping Requirements 

(a) The Permittee shall maintain the following records:

(14) The time periods in which the Permittee is operating in CEMS mode as the 

primary monitoring scenario or the CMS systems described in D.13.15 as 

the primary monitoring scenario. 

(33) The following condition has been added under Compliance Determination Section and 

numbered as D.14.4, since Condition C.5 Operation of Equipment has been deleted from 

the permit. Subsequent conditions have been re-numbered accordingly: 

Compliance Determination Requirements 

D.14.4 Requirement to Control Emissions [40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb, 40 CFR 63 Subpart GGG, 40 

CFR 63 Subpart DD, 326 IAC 2-2-3, and 326 IAC 8-5-3] 

Except for equipment excluded from emission control requirements and except as 

otherwise provided by statute or rule, or in this permit, the RTO control system shall be 

operated at all times that the emission units vented to the control equipment are in 

operation. 

(34) The following condition has been added under Compliance Determination Section and 

numbered as D.15.4, since Condition C.5 Operation of Equipment has been deleted from 

the permit. Subsequent conditions have been re-numbered accordingly: 

Compliance Determination Requirements 

D.15.4 Requirement to Control Emissions [40 CFR 60 Subpart Kb, 40 CFR 63 Subpart GGG, 40 

CFR 63 Subpart DD, 326 IAC 2-2-3, and 326 IAC 8-5-3] 

Except for equipment excluded from emission control requirements and except as 

otherwise provided by statute or rule or in this permit, the T79 control system shall be 

operated at all times that the emission units vented to the control equipment are in 

operation. 

(35) Starting September 13, 2007, Boilers 1, 2, and 3 will no longer be using coal for fuel, 

instead 100% of natural gas will be used. Condition G.1.4(a) has been revised to require 

the Permittee to calculate the NOx emissions, each month, by multiplying the amount of 

natural gas burned in each calendar month by a NOx emission factor of 100 lbs 

NOx/million cubic feet of natural gas burned; and 

The following condition for calculating NOx emissions from boilers No 6 and 7, was added 

and numbered G.1.4(i): 

G.1.4 Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) Emission Limit Determination [326 IAC 2-2.4-7(6) & (7)] 

 [326 IAC 2-2.4-12] 

The Permittee shall determine actual annual emissions of NOx by employing the following 

techniques: 

(a) The Permittee shall calculate NOx emissions from Boilers 1, 2, and 3, in tons, each calendar 

month, by multiplying the amount of coal consumed in each calendar month by a NOx 

emission factor of 16 lb NOx/ton of coal burned. After the coal feed to Boilers No. 1, No. 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 59 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

2, and No. 3 is shutdown, or starting September 13, 2007, whichever comes first, the 

NOx emissions from these boilers shall be calculated using an emission factor of 100 

lbs NOx/million cubic feet of natural gas burned. 

(b) The Permittee shall calculate NOx emissions from burning natural gas in Boilers 4 and 5, 

in tons, each calendar month, by multiplying the amount of natural gas burned in each 

calendar month by an NOx emission factor of 280 lb NOx/million cubic feet of natural gas 

burned in Boiler 4 and 100 lb NOx/million cubic feet of natural gas burned in Boiler 5. 

(c) The Permittee shall calculate NOx emissions from burning fuel oil in Boilers 4 and 5, in 

tons, each calendar month, by multiplying the amount of fuel oil burned in each calendar 

month by an NOx emission factor of 24 lb NOx/1000 gallons of fuel oil burned in Boiler 4 

and 20 lb NOx/1000 gallons of fuel oil burned in Boiler 5. 

(d) The Permittee shall determine NOx emissions from diesel engines, in tons, each calendar 

month, through one of the methods described in (1) and (2) below. The Permittee shall 

identify which method it used when it reports emissions pursuant to Condition G.1.8. 

(1) Potential to emit method: The Permittee shall use the following values, which 

represent the NOx potential to emit of the diesel engines, as the actual emissions: 

(A) For the T121 1250 KW diesel electrical generator – 1.5 ton/month [18.1 

ton/yr]. 

(B) For the T5 380 HP diesel emergency generator – 0.2 ton/month [2.9 

ton/yr] 

(C) For the T62 1100 KW diesel emergency generator – 0.7 ton/month [8.9 

ton/yr]. 

(D) For the T135 390 HP diesel emergency generator – 0.3 ton/month [3.0 

ton/yr]. 

(E) For the T78 58 KW diesel compressor engine – 0.9 ton/month [10.6 

ton/yr] 

(F) For the T89-1 KW diesel compressor engine – 0.9 ton/month [10.6 

ton/yr]. 

(G) For the T89-2 KW diesel compressor engine – 0.9 ton/month [10.6 

ton/yr]. 

(H) 

(e) The Permittee shall calculate NOx emissions from the T174 Thermal Research 

Incinerator, in tons, each calendar month, by multiplying the actual hours of operation of 

the incinerator for each month by a NOx emission factor of 2.5 lb NOx/hour of operation. 

(f) The methods for determining monthly NOx emissions from the T49 Incinerator, the T149 

Incinerator, the RTOs, and the T79 Fume Incinerators are described in Condition F.1.5 of 

this permit. 

(g) NOx emissions from the T71 Pilot Plant are equivalent to the potential to emit for this 

facility – 0.1 ton/yr. 

(h) When determining actual annual emissions of NOx, the Permittee shall include emissions 

occurring as a result of startups, shutdown, and malfunctions.

(i) The Permittee shall determine NOx emissions from boilers No. 6 and No. 7, in tons, 

each calendar month, using CEMS data from Condition D.20.16 and using the 

following method to determine NOx emission limits in Condition D.20.4: NOx 
Eli Lilly and Company – Tippecanoe Laboratories Page 60 of 60 

Lafayette, Indiana SPM No.:157-22717-00006 

Permit Reviewer: Aida De Guzman 

emissions in lbs = lbs NOx/MMBTU * fuel usage( scf for natural gas, and gallons for 

fuel oil) * Heat content per unit of fuel used. A value of 1000 BTU/scf of natural gas 

shall be used if heat content data for the natural gas is unavailable. If data is not 

available for calculating the NOx emissions, the following substitution value shall 

be used: 32.0 lbs NOx/Hour. This value represents the maximum potential 

emissions of each boiler. 

(36) Condition G.1.5(a) has been revised by adding the following condition for calculating SO2

emissions from boilers No 1, No. 2, and No. 3 when burning 100 % natural gas, and 

Condition G.1.5 (j)was added for calculating SO2 emissions from boilers No. 6 and No. 7: 

G.1.5 Sulfur dioxides (SO2) emission limit determination [326 IAC 2-2.4-7(6) & (7)] [326 IAC 2-2.4-12] 

The Permittee shall determine actual annual emissions of SO2 by employing the following 

techniques: 

(a) The Permittee shall calculate SO2 emissions from Boilers 1, 2, and 3, in tons, each 

calendar month, by multiplying the amount of coal consumed in each calendar month by 

an SO2 emission factor of 38*S lb SO2/ton of coal burned, where S = the percent sulfur 

content of the coal as determined by Condition D.1.7. In addition, the Permittee shall 

calculate the SO2 emissions from burning natural gas in Boilers 1, 2, and 3, in tons, each 

calendar month, by multiplying the amount of natural gas burned in each calendar month 

by an SO2 emission factor of 0.6 lb SO2/million cubic feet of natural gas burned. 

 After the coal feed to Boilers No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3 is shutdown, or starting 

September 13, 2007, whichever comes first, the Permittee shall calculate, one 

hundred percent (100%) of the SO2 emissions from Boilers 1, 2, and 3, each 

calendar month, by multiplying the amount of natural gas burned in each calendar 

month by a SO2 emission factor of 0.6 lbs SO2 /million cubic feet of natural gas 

burned. 

(i) The Permittee shall calculate SO2 emissions from burning natural gas in boilers No. 

6 and No. 7, in tons, each calendar month by multiplying the amount of natural gas 

burned in each calendar month by an SO2 emission factor of 0.6 lb SO2/million 

cubic feet of natural gas burned. 

(j) The Permittee shall calculate SO2 emissions from burning fuel oil in boilers No. 6 

and No. 7, in tons, each calendar month, by multiplying the amount of fuel oil 

burned in each calendar month by an SO2 emission factor of 42.6 lb SO2/1000 

gallons of fuel oil burned. 

Conclusion and Recommendation 

The construction of this proposed modification shall be subject to the conditions of the attached 

proposed Part 70 Significant Permit Modification No. 157-22717-00006. The staff recommends 

to the Commissioner that this Part 70 Significant Source Modification be approved.