77380 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 246 / Monday, December 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

outstanding voting securities of another 

passive Small Business that is the direct 

owner of at least 50% of the outstanding 

voting securities of the subsidiary 

company). 

* * * * * 

(c) Real Estate Businesses. (1) You are 

not permitted to finance any business 

classified under North American 

Industry Classification System (NAICS) 

codes 531110 (lessors of nonresidential 

buildings except miniwarehouses), 

531120 (lessors of residential buildings 

and dwellings), 531190 (lessors of other 

real estate property), 237210 (land 

subdivision), or 236117 (new housing 

for-sale builders). You are not permitted 

to finance any business classified under 

NAICS codes 236118 (residential 

remodelers), 236210 (industrial building 

construction), or 236220 (commercial 

and institutional building construction), 

if such business is primarily engaged in 

construction or renovation of properties 

on its own account rather than as a 

hired contractor. You are permitted to 

finance a business classified under 

NAICS codes 531210 (offices of real 

estate agents and brokers), 531311 

(residential property managers), 531312 

(nonresidential property managers), 

531320 (offices of real estate appraisers), 

or 531390 (other activities related to real 

estate), only if such business derives at 

least 80 percent of its revenue from nonAffiliate sources. 

(2) You are not permitted to finance 

a Small Business, regardless of NAICS 

classification, if the Financing is to be 

used to acquire or refinance real 

property, unless the Small Business: 

* * * * * 

■ 5. Amend § 107.1150 by revising 

paragraphs (e)(1), (e)(2)(iii), and 

(e)(2)(iv) to read as follows: 

§ 107.1150 Maximum amount of Leverage 

for a Section 301(c) Licensee. 

* * * * * 

(e) Additional Leverage based on 

Energy Saving Qualified Investments in 

Smaller Enterprises. (1) Subject to SBA’s 

credit policies, if you were licensed on 

or after October 1, 2008, you may have 

outstanding Leverage in excess of the 

amounts permitted by paragraphs (a) 

and (b) of this section in accordance 

with this paragraph (e). Any investment 

that you use as a basis to seek additional 

Leverage under this paragraph (e) 

cannot also be used to seek additional 

Leverage under paragraph (c) of this 

section. 

* * * * * 

(2) * * * 

(iii) Subtract from your outstanding 

Leverage the lesser of (e)(2)(i) or 

(e)(2)(ii). 

(iv) If the amount calculated in 

paragraph (e)(2)(iii) is less than the 

maximum Leverage determined under 

paragraph (a) of this section, the 

difference between the two amounts 

equals your additional Leverage 

availability. 

Dated: November 14, 2013. 

Jeanne Hulit, 

Acting Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2013–30504 Filed 12–20–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–1056; Directorate 

Identifier 2013–CE–046–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Dornier 

Luftfahrt GmbH Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for Dornier 

Luftfahrt GmbH Models Dornier 228– 

100, 228–101, 228–200, 228–201, 228– 

202, and 228–212 airplanes that would 

supersede AD 2006–11–19. This 

proposed AD results from mandatory 

continuing airworthiness information 

(MCAI) originated by an aviation 

authority of another country to identify 

and correct an unsafe condition on an 

aviation product. The MCAI describes 

the unsafe condition as chafed or 

damaged wiring on the flight deck 

overhead panels (5VE and 6VE). We are 

issuing this proposed AD to require 

actions to address the unsafe condition 

on these products. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by February 6, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: (202) 493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact RUAG 

Aerospace Services GmbH, Dornier 228 

Customer Support, P.O. Box 1253, 

82231 Wessling, Germany; telephone: 

+49 (0) 8153–30 2220; fax: +49 (0) 8153– 

30 4258; email: 

custsupport.dornier228@ruag.com; 

Internet: http://www.ruag.com/en/

Aviation/Aviation_Home. You may 

review copies of the referenced service 

information at the FAA, Small Airplane 

Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, 

Missouri 64106. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, 

call (816) 329–4148. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching and 

locating Docket Number FAA–2013– 

1056; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Office 

(telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the 

ADDRESSES section. Comments will be 

available in the AD docket shortly after 

receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl 

Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, 

Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, 

Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; 

telephone: (816) 329–4146; fax: (816) 

329–4090; email: karl.schletzbaum@

faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposed AD. Send your comments 

to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2013–1056; Directorate Identifier 

2013–CE–046–AD’’ at the beginning of 

your comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD because of those 

comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http://

regulations.gov, including any personal 

information you provide. We will also 

post a report summarizing each 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 246 / Monday, December 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules 77381 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

On May 24, 2006, we issued AD 

2006–11–19, Amendment 39–14624 (71 

FR 32268; June 5, 2006). That AD 

required actions intended to address an 

unsafe condition on the products listed 

above. 

Since we issued AD 2006–11–19 (71 

FR 32268; June 5, 2006), Dornier 

Luftfahrt GmbH changed the 

compliance time between repetitive 

inspections and incorporated those 

inspections into the Time Limits/

Maintenance Checks Manual (TLMCM). 

The European Aviation Safety Agency 

(EASA), which is the Technical Agent 

for the Member States of the European 

Community, has issued AD No.: 2013– 

0244, dated October 4, 2013 (referred to 

after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an 

unsafe condition for the specified 

products. The MCAI states: 

RUAG Aerospace Services GmbH issued 

Time Limits/Maintenance Checks Manual 

(TLMCM) TM–TLMCM–090305–ALL, 

Revision 5 dated 20 March 2011 respectively 

TM–TLMCM–228–00002–150610, Revision 1 

dated 03 March 2011, listing component life 

limits and describing maintenance 

instructions for the Dornier 228 type design. 

The Document TM–TLMCM–228–00002– 

150610 is valid for airplane SN 8300 and up 

and other airplane SN modified according to 

CN–228–247. The instructions contained in 

that manual have been identified as 

mandatory actions for continued 

airworthiness. 

In 2005, chafed wiring was found on 5VE 

Panel due to lost adhesive of the TY–RAP 

holder and subsequent vibration of the cable 

harness. 

To address this potential unsafe condition, 

RUAG issued All Operators Telefax (AOT) 

No. AOT–228–24–028 and Temporary 

Revision (TR) 05–05 of the TLMCM 

introducing repetitive of the cockpit 

overhead panels 5VE and 6VE and, 

depending on findings, corrective actions(s). 

Subsequently, LBA issued AD D–2005–438 

(EASA approval 2005–6430) to require those 

actions. 

Since that AD was issued, the instructions 

of TR 05–05 have been incorporated into 

TM–TLMCM–090305–ALL, Revision 5 dated 

20 March 2011 respectively into TM– 

TLMCM–228–00002–150610, Revision 1 

dated 03 March 2011. 

For the reasons described above, this AD 

retains the requirements of EASA AD D– 

2005–438, which is superseded, and requires 

the implementation of the life limits and 

maintenance actions as specified in the 

TLMCM (TM–TLMCM–090305–ALL 

respectively TM–TLMCM–228–00002– 

150610) for zone 321 overhead panels 5VE/ 

6VE. 

You may examine the MCAI on the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov 

by searching for and locating it in 

Docket No. FAA–2013–1056. 

Relevant Service Information 

Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH has issued 

RUAG Aerospace Services GmbH 

Dornier 228 TLMCM, TM–TLMCM– 

090305–ALL, Revision 5, March 20, 

2011; and RUAG Aerospace Services 

GmbH Dornier 228 Airplane 

Maintenance Manual, TM–AMM–228– 

00014–080184, Revision 3, October 30, 

2012. The actions described in this 

service information are intended to 

correct the unsafe condition identified 

in the MCAI. 

FAA’s Determination and Requirements 

of the Proposed AD 

This product has been approved by 

the aviation authority of another 

country, and is approved for operation 

in the United States. Pursuant to our 

bilateral agreement with this State of 

Design Authority, they have notified us 

of the unsafe condition described in the 

MCAI and service information 

referenced above. We are proposing this 

AD because we evaluated all 

information and determined the unsafe 

condition exists and is likely to exist or 

develop on other products of the same 

type design. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this proposed AD 

will affect 17 products of U.S. registry. 

We also estimate that it would take 

about 2 work-hours per product to 

comply with the basic requirements of 

this proposed AD. The average labor 

rate is $85 per work-hour. 

Based on these figures, we estimate 

the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. 

operators to be $2,890 or $170 per 

product. 

In addition, we estimate that any 

necessary follow-on actions would take 

about 3 work-hours and require parts 

costing $1,000, for a cost of $1,255 per 

product. We have no way of 

determining the number of products 

that may need these actions. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

the DOT Regulatory Policies and 

Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 

1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by 

removing Amendment 39–14624 (71 FR 

32268; June 5, 2006), and adding the 

following new AD: 

Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH: Docket No. FAA– 

2013–1056; Directorate Identifier 2013– 

CE–046–AD. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

We must receive comments by February 6, 

2014. 

(b) Affected ADs 

This AD supersedes AD 2006–11–19, 

Amendment 39–14624 (71 FR 32268; June 5, 

2006). 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
77382 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 246 / Monday, December 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH 

Dornier Models 228–100, 228–101, 228–200, 

228–201, 228–202, and 228–212 airplanes, all 

serial numbers, certificated in any category. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association of America 

(ATA) Code 5: Time Limits. 

(e) Reason 

This AD was prompted by mandatory 

continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) 

originated by an aviation authority of another 

country to identify and correct an unsafe 

condition on an aviation product. The MCAI 

describes the unsafe condition as chafed or 

damaged wiring on the flight deck overhead 

panels (5VE and 6VE). We are issuing this 

AD to prevent chafing and damage to the 

wiring in the flight deck overhead panels, 

which could result in short-circuiting of 

related wiring and possibly lead to electrical 

failure of affected systems and potential fire 

in the flight deck. 

(f) Actions and Compliance 

Unless already done, do the following 

actions in paragraphs (f)(1) through (f)(3) of 

this AD: 

(1) Within the next 600 hours time-inservice (TIS) after the effective date of this 

AD and repetitively thereafter at intervals not 

to exceed 600 hours TIS, inspect the wiring 

in the flight deck overhead panels, 5VE and 

6VE, for chafing, damage, and/or incorrect 

installation (wire tie attachment holders) 

following the Zonal Inspection Program for 

zone 321 in section 5–22–10 of Chapter 05 

in RUAG Aerospace Services GmbH Dornier 

228 Time Limits/Maintenance Checks 

Manual (TLMCM), TM–TLMCM–090305– 

ALL, Revision 5, March 20, 2011; and 

subjects 31–10–07 and 31–10–08, dated 

November 25, 2009, of Chapter 31, 

Indicating/Recording Systems in RUAG 

Aerospace Services GmbH Dornier 228 

Airplane Maintenance Manual, TM–AMM– 

228–00014–080184, Revision 3, October 30, 

2012. 

(2) If any chafed or damaged wires are 

found during any inspection required in 

paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, before further 

flight, repair the affected wire(s) and assure 

correct installation of the wiring in the flight 

deck overhead panels by reattaching or 

replacing the wire tie attachment holders and 

securing any loose wires to the wire tie 

attachment holders with plastic wire ties 

following subjects 31–10–07 and 31–10–08, 

dated November 25, 2009, of Chapter 31, 

Indicating/Recording Systems in RUAG 

Aerospace Services GmbH Dornier 228 

Airplane Maintenance Manual, TM–AMM– 

228–00014–080184, Revision 3, October 30, 

2012. 

(3) To comply with the actions of this AD, 

you may insert a copy of this AD or a copy 

of the required actions of this AD into the 

airworthiness limitations section of the FAAapproved maintenance program (e.g., 

maintenance manual). This action may be 

done by an owner/operator (pilot) holding at 

least a private pilot certificate and must be 

entered into the airplane records showing 

compliance with this AD in accordance with 

14 CFR 43.9 (a)(1)(4) and 14 CFR 

91.417(a)(2)(v). The record must be 

maintained as required by 14 CFR 91.173 or 

135.439. 

(g) Other FAA AD Provisions 

The following provisions also apply to this 

AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office, 

FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs 

for this AD, if requested using the procedures 

found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to 

ATTN: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace 

Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 

901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 

64106; telephone: (816) 329–4146; fax: (816) 

329–4090; email: karl.schletzbaum@faa.gov. 

Before using any approved AMOC on any 

airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify 

your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in 

the FAA Flight Standards District Office 

(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(h) Related Information 

Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety 

Agency (EASA) AD No.: 2013–0244, dated 

October 4, 2013, for related information. You 

may examine the MCAI on the Internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating it in Docket No. FAA–2013– 

1056. For service information related to this 

AD, contact RUAG Aerospace Services 

GmbH, Dornier 228 Customer Support, P.O. 

Box 1253, 82231 Wessling, Germany; 

telephone: +49 (0) 8153–30 2220; fax: +49 (0) 

8153–30 4258; email: 

custsupport.dornier228@ruag.com; Internet: 

http://www.ruag.com/en/Aviation/Aviation_

Home. You may review copies of the 

referenced service information at the FAA, 

Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, 

Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information 

on the availability of this material at the 

FAA, call (816) 329–4148. 

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on 

December 13, 2013. 

Earl Lawrence, 

Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft 

Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2013–30491 Filed 12–20–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0884; Directorate 

Identifier 2013–NE–31–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce 

Deutschland Ltd & Co KG Turbofan 

Engines 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for all 

Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG 

(RRD) BR700–715A1–30, BR700– 

715B1–30, and BR700–715C1–30 

turbofan engines. This proposed AD was 

prompted by a report of a partial debonding of the low pressure compressor 

(LPC) case ice impact panels during an 

engine shop visit. This proposed AD 

would require replacement of the LPC 

case ice impact panels. We are 

proposing this AD to prevent failure of 

the LPC case ice impact panels, which 

could result in damage to the engine 

and loss of control of the airplane. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by February 21, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov and follow 

the instructions for sending your 

comments electronically. 

• Mail: Docket Management Facility, 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

Washington, DC 20590–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail 

address above between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

For service information identified in 

this AD, contact, contact Rolls-Royce 

Deutschland Ltd & Co KG, Eschenweg 

11, Dahlewitz, 15827 BlankenfeldeMahlow, Germany; phone: 49 0 33– 

7086–1883; fax: 49 0 33–7086–3276. 

You may view this service information 

at the FAA, Engine & Propeller 

Directorate, 12 New England Executive 

Park, Burlington, MA. For information 

on the availability of this material at the 

FAA, call 781–238–7125. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS