alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 12

                      HIGH VOLTAGE ENGINEERING CORPORATION
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                      (In thousands, except ratio amounts)
                                   (Unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                    FISCAL YEAR ENDED

                                           -----------------------------------------------------------------
                                            APRIL 29,     APRIL 24,     APRIL 25,     APRIL 26,    APRIL 27,
                                              2000           1999         1998          1997          1996
                                           ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------   ----------
Earnings:
<S>                                         <C>            <C>          <C>           <C>          <C>
    Income (loss) from continuing
      operations before income taxes,
      discontinued operations and
      extraordinary item.................   $(26,780)     $  2,205      $(15,536)     $(3,020)     $ (4,629)
                                            ---------     --------      --------      -------      --------

Fixed charges:
    Interest expense, accretion of
      redeemable put warrants and
      amortization of debt discount
      and premium on all indebtedness....     21,791        19,854        18,159       10,845        10,292
    Portion of rent under long-term
      operating leases representative
      of an interest factor (1/3)........        653           658           683          483           287
    Accretion of redeemable preferred
      stock..............................        448           266           270           --            --
    Preferred stock dividend requirement.      4,965         2,597         3,085          479           446
                                            ---------     --------      --------      -------      -------
         Total fixed charges.............     27,857        23,375        22,197       11,807        11,025
                                            ---------     --------      --------      -------      --------
    Earnings from continuing operations
      before income taxes, discontinued
      operations, extraordinary item
      and fixed charges..................   $  1,077       $25,580      $  6,661      $ 8,787      $  6,396
                                            --------       -------      --------      -------      --------
                                            --------       -------      ---------     -------      --------
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.......       0.04x         1.09x           --           --            --
</TABLE>


The Company's earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $15,536, $3,020
and $4,629 in fiscal 1999, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1446/2006

of 29 September 2006         

concerning the authorisation of Enterococcus faecium (Biomin IMB52) as a feed additive

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition (1), and in particular Article 9(2) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The preparation specified in the Annex, belonging to the additive category ‘zootechnical additives’ and to the functional group ‘gut flora stabilisers’, is authorised as an additive in animal nutrition subject to the conditions laid down in that Annex.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 September 2006.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, p. 29. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 378/2005 (OJ L 59, 5.3.2005, p. 8).

(2)OJ L 165, 30.4.2004, as corrected by OJ L 191, 28.5.2004, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 776/2006 (OJ L 136, 24.5.2006, p. 3).

(3)OJ L 62, 2.3.2001, p. 3.

----

ANNEX

----

(1)  Details of the analytical methods are available at the following address of the Community Reference Laboratory: www.irmm.jrc.be/html/crlfaa/

----
#### Geraldine Gorden, Respondent, v. Oliver A. Gorden, Appellant.

Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; Loan Repayment Program 2011.                    

*Date:*                         April 30, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 10 a.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         JoAnn McConnell, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, NINDS/NIH/DHHS/Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Suite 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-5324,                         *mcconnej@ninds.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 16, 2011.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-6858 Filed 3-22-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### Rose L. Nicoud, Plaintiff, v. New York Life Insurance Company, Defendant.

Motion granted on payment by the defendant of the taxable costs in the Court of Appeals to this date, with leave to plaintiff to apply to the Court of Appeals for permission to withdraw her appeal and proceed with a new trial if so advised. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Stapleton, JJ.
#### § 101.57 Responses to motions and petitions.

Within 8 days after a written motion or petition is served, or such other period as the reviewing authority or the presiding officer may fix, any party may file a response thereto. An immediate oral response may be made to an oral motion.
EXHIBIT 23.1







             INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM'S CONSENT
             -------------------------------------------------------


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements of
Herley  Industries,  Inc.  on Form S-8  [File  numbers  333-145503,  333-121554,
333-71476,  333-95327,  333-46777 and 333-17369] of our report dated October 10,
2007, with respect to our audits of the  consolidated  financial  statements and
related consolidated financial statement schedule of Herley Industries, Inc. and
subsidiaries  as of July 29, 2007 and July 30, 2006 and for the  fifty-two  (52)
weeks ended July 29, 2007,  July 30, 2006 and July 31, 2005 and our report dated
October  10,  2007 with  respect to our audit of the  effectiveness  of internal
control over financial reporting of Herley Industries, Inc. as of July 29, 2007,
which  reports  are  included  in this  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K of  Herley
Industries, Inc. for the fifty-two (52) weeks ended July 29, 2007.

/s/ Marcum & Kliegman LLP

Marcum & Kliegman LLP
Melville, New York
October 11, 2007
#### § 101.73 Testimony.

Testimony shall be given orally under oath or affirmation by witnesses at the hearing; but the presiding officer, in his discretion, may require or permit that the direct testimony of any witness be prepared in writing and served on all parties in advance of the hearing. Such testimony may be adopted by the witness at the hearing, and filed as part of the record thereof. Unless authorized by the presiding officer, witnesses will not be permitted to read prepared testimony into the record. Except as provided in §§ 101.75 and 101.76, witnesses shall be available at the hearing for cross-examination.
Editorial Note on Subpart G of Part 42
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart G of part 42 appear by Order No. 2679-2003, 68 FR 51364, 51365, 51366, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 42.511 Reasonable accommodation. ( a ) A recipient shall make reasonable accommodation to the known physical or mental limitations of an otherwise qualified handicapped applicant or employee unless the recipient can demonstrate, based on the individual assessment of the applicant or employee, that the accommodation would impose an undue hardship on the operation of its program or activity.
( b ) Reasonable accommodation may include making facilities used by employees readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons, job restructuring, part-time or modified work schedules, acquisition or modification of equipment or devices (*e.g.,* telecommunication or other telephone devices), the provisions of readers or qualified interpreters, and other similar actions.
( c ) Whether an accommodation would impose an undue hardship on the operation of a recipient's program or activity depends upon a case-by-case analysis weighing factors that include: ( 1 ) The overall size of the recipient's program or activity with respect to number of employees, number and type of facilities, and size of budget;
( 2 ) The type of the recipient's operation, including the composition and structure of the recipient's workforce; and
( 3 ) The nature and cost of the accommodation needed.
A reasonable accommodation may require a recipient to bear more than an insignificant economic cost in making allowance for the handicap of a qualified applicant or employee and to accept minor inconvenience which does not bear on the ability of the handicapped individual to perform the essential duties of the job.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### General Services Administration

          - [GSA Bulletin FTR 11-05; 2011-0002; Sequence 2]

# AGENCY:

Office of Governmentwide Policy, General Services Administration (GSA).

# ACTION:

Notice of a bulletin.

# SUMMARY:

                        The purpose of this notice is to inform agencies of FTR Bulletin 11-05, which provides the annual changes to the RIT allowance tables necessary for calculating the amount of a transferee's increased tax burden due to an employee's official permanent change of station is now available. FTR Bulletin 11-05 and all other FTR Bulletins can be found at                         *http://www.gsa.gov/​ftrbulletin.*                         The RIT allowance tables are located at                         *http://www.gsa.gov/​relocationpolicy.*

# DATES:

This notice is effective March 24, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Ed Davis, Office of Governmentwide Policy (M), Office of Travel, Transportation, and Asset Management (MT), General Services Administration at (202) 208-7638 or via e-mail at                         *ed.davis@gsa.gov.*                         Please cite FTR Bulletin 11-05.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On June 25, 2008 the General Services Administration (GSA) published FTR Amendment 2008-04 in the                     **Federal Register**                     (73 FR 35952) specifying that the General Services Administration (GSA) would no longer publish the RITA tables found in 41 CFR part 301-17 Appendices A through D. The tables will be published at                     *http://www.gsa.gov/​relocationpolicy.*

Dated: March 21, 2011.

Janet Dobbs,

Director, Office of Travel, Transportation & Asset Mgmt.

[FR Doc. 2011-6968 Filed 3-23-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-14-P
Holobeam, Inc.
Form 10K/A NO. 1
September 30, 2006
Exhibit D
Code of Ethics


Item 15, 3E.  Code of Ethics
----------------------------
        The Registrant has not yet adopted a Code of Ethics as it
currently utilizes the Registrant's Policies and Procedures
contained in its Management Manual.  At present the Registrant has
two (2) full-time employees, the President and CEO, and the
Secretary, and one (1) part-time employee, the Treasurer.
        The Registrant intends to convert the appropriate sections of
the Management Manual to its Code of Ethics, which will be
completed by September 30, 2007.
        The Registrant believes that the policies and procedures
contained in its management manual are consistent with the
requirements and intent of the Code of Ethics requirements.
        It is the intention of the Registrant to file the Code of
Ethics when completed, on or about September 30, 2007.



<PAGE>
Editorial Note on Part 1337
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1337 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and 68 FR 10360, Mar. 5, 2003.

§ 1337.3 Expedited administration of oath of allegiance. ( a ) An applicant may be granted an expedited oath administration ceremony by either the court or the Service upon demonstrating sufficient cause. In determining whether to grant an expedited oath administration ceremony, the court or the district director shall consider special circumstances of a compelling or humanitarian nature. Special circumstances may include but are not limited to: ( 1 ) The serious illness of the applicant or a member of the applicant's family;
( 2 ) Permanent disability of the applicant sufficiently incapacitating as to prevent the applicant's personal appearance at a scheduled ceremony;
( 3 ) The developmental disability or advanced age of the applicant which would make appearance at a scheduled ceremony inappropriate; or
( 4 ) Urgent or compelling circumstances relating to travel or employment determined by the court or the Service to be sufficiently meritorious to warrant special consideration.
( b ) Courts exercising exclusive authority may either hold an expedited oath administration ceremony or refer the applicant to the Service in order for either the Immigration Judge or the Service to conduct an oath administration ceremony, if an expedited judicial oath administration ceremony is impractical. The court shall inform the district director in writing of its decision to grant the applicant an expedited oath administration ceremony and that the court has relinquished exclusive jurisdiction as to that applicant.
( c ) All requests for expedited administration of the oath of allegiance shall be made in writing to either the court or the Service. Such requests shall contain sufficient information to substantiate the claim of special circumstances to permit either the court or the Service to properly exercise the discretionary authority to grant the relief sought. The court or the Service may seek verification of the validity of the information provided in the request. If the applicant submits a written request to the Service, but is awaiting an oath administration ceremony by a court pursuant to § 1337.8, the Service promptly shall provide the court with a copy of the request without reaching a decision on whether to grant or deny the request.
[60 FR 37804, July 24, 1995]
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

TRANS OVA GENETICS, L.C., Appellant

v.

XY, LLC, Appellee

______________________

2019

- 2312

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018

- 00250.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

D AVID A. K ELLY , Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented by S TEVEN S HIPE , Washington, DC.

Z.W. J ULIUS C HEN

, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & FeldLLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by K IRT S. O'N EILL

, G EORGE A NDREW L EVER
R OSBROOK

, San Antonio, TX

.

______________________ Case: 19-2312 Document: 48 Page: 1 Filed: 09/08/2020T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (R EYNA

, C LEVENGER

, and C HEN

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

September 8, 2020

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court Case: 19-2312 Document: 48 Page: 2 Filed: 09/08/2020
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4875 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4875

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 2201 E. Maple Street in North Canton, Ohio, as the ``Lance Cpl. 
                  Stacy `Annie' Dryden Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANCE CPL. STACY ``ANNIE'' DRYDEN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2201 E. Maple Street in North Canton, Ohio, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Lance Cpl. Stacy `Annie' Dryden Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lance Cpl. 
Stacy `Annie' Dryden Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 30, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4875

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 2201 E. Maple Street in North Canton, Ohio, as the ``Lance Cpl. 
                  Stacy `Annie' Dryden Post Office''.
```
~,~1eo srAr

~

s 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

~
#### § 680.102 Applicability.

Except where noted, these regulations apply to all NEVI Formula Program projects as well as projects for the construction of publicly accessible EV chargers that are funded with funds made available under Title 23, United States Code, including any EV charging infrastructure project funded with Federal funds that is treated as a project on a Federal-aid highway.
(No. 76-CC-2952

#### Lawrence T. Hartman, Claimant, *v.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Order filed November 6, 1978.*

On September 15,1978, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss this cause.

This claim is for legal fees by a private attorney hired by the adoptive parents of a child under the jurisdiction of the Department of Children and Family Services.

The Department of Children and Family Services agreed prior to the adoption to permit the adoptive parents to choose an attorney of their own choice and agreed to pay fees connected therewith in the amount of $642.90, which amount was paid in full.

The $70.00 additional being sought was submitted as a billing two days after the finalization of the adoption.

The payment of private counsel is discretionary with the Department of Children and Family Services and any amount agreed to and paid are benefits to which the adoptive parents have no legal right.

*652The Departmental Report submitted by the Department of Children and Family Services denied this claim.

Under Rule 14 of the Court of Claims, it appears that Claimant was employed not by the State of Illinois but by the adoptive parents and, consequently, the State is not responsible.

Motion to dismiss is granted and this cause dismissed.