### 28776 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 95 / Thursday, May 16, 2013 / Proposed Rules

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  For information regarding this source specific SIP revision, contact Ms. Kelly Sheckler, Air Quality Modeling and Transportation Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Ms. Sheckler’s telephone number is (404) 562–9222; email address: sheckler.kelly@epa.gov

.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  For additional information see the direct final rule which is published in the
Rules Section of this Federal Register

. A detailed rationale for the approval is
set forth in the direct final rule. If no
adverse comments are received in response to this rule, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments
received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should
do so at this time.

Dated: May 1, 2013. A. Stanley Meiburg, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.

[FR Doc. 2013–11563 Filed 5–15–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION**
**AGENCY**

**40 CFR Part 52**

**[EPA–R04–OAR–2013–0223; FRL–9813–7]**

**Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Georgia; State**  **Implementation Plan Miscellaneous**
**Revisions**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule.

**SUMMARY :**  EPA is proposing changes to the Georgia State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Georgia
Environmental Protection Division to EPA in four separate SIP submittals dated September 15, 2008, August 30, 2010 (two submittals), and December 15, 2011. In the portions of the submittals being approved today, the SIP revisions update the Georgia SIP to
reflect EPA’s current national ambient air quality standards for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, lead, and particulate matter found in the Code of Federal Regulations. In the Final Rules Section of this Federal Register , EPA is approving the State’s implementation plan revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this rule, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct
final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this
document should do so at this time.

**DATES :**  Comments must be received on or before June 17, 2013.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– OAR–2013–0223 by one of the following
methods:

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for submitting

comments.

2. Email: R4-RDS@epa.gov

. 3. Fax: (404) 562–9019.

4. Mail: EPA–R04–OAR–2013–0223, Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.

5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae Benjamin, Chief, Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office’s normal hours of operation. The Regional Office’s official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal holidays.

Please see the direct final rule which
is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register for detailed
instructions on how to submit

comments.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  For information regarding this source specific SIP revision, contact Mr. Richard Wong, Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Mr. Wong’s telephone number is (404) 562– 8726; email address: wong.richard@epa.gov

.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  For additional information see the direct final rule which is published in the
Rules Section of this Federal Register

. A detailed rationale for the approval is
set forth in the direct final rule. If no
adverse comments are received in response to this rule, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments
received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should
do so at this time.

Dated: May 3, 2013. A. Stanley Meiburg, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.

[FR Doc. 2013–11565 Filed 5–15–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION**
**AGENCY**

**40 CFR Part 52**

**[EPA–R04–OAR–2013–0271; FRL–9814–2]**

**Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Kentucky;**  **Stage II Requirements for Enterprise Holdings, Inc. at Cincinnati/Northern**  **Kentucky International Airport in Boone County** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule.

**SUMMARY :**  EPA is proposing to approve a source-specific State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted to EPA by the Commonwealth of Kentucky, through the Kentucky Division for Air Quality (KDAQ) on April 25, 2013, for the purpose of exempting Enterprise Holdings, Inc., facility from the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) Stage II vapor control requirements. The Enterprise Holdings, Inc., facility is currently being
constructed at the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport in Boone County, Kentucky. EPA’s proposed approval of this revision to Kentucky’s SIP is based on the December 12, 2006, EPA policy memorandum from Stephen D. Page, entitled ‘‘Removal of Stage II Vapor Recovery in Situations Where Widespread Use of Onboard Refueling Vapor Recovery is Demonstrated.’’ This action is being taken pursuant to the

CAA.


### 28777 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 95 / Thursday, May 16, 2013 / Proposed Rules

**DATES :**  Comments must be received on or before June 17, 2013.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– OAR–2013–0271 by one of the following
methods:

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for submitting

comments.

2. Email: R4–RDS@epa.gov.

3. Fax: (404) 562–9019.

4. Mail: EPA–R04–OAR–2013–0271, Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.

5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae Benjamin, Chief, Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office’s normal hours of operation. The Regional Office’s official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal holidays.

Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. ‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–2013– 0271.’’ EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through www.regulations.gov or email, information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http:// www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.

Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the person listed in the **FOR**

**FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** section to schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal holidays.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  For information regarding this source specific SIP revision, contact Ms. Kelly Sheckler, Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Ms. Sheckler’s telephone number is (404) 562–9992; email address: sheckler.kelly@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

Table of Contents

I. Background II. Analysis of the Commonwealth’s submittal III. Proposed Action IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

Under the CAA Amendments of 1990, EPA designated and classified three Kentucky Counties (Boone, Campbell and Kenton) and four Ohio Counties (Butler, Clermont, Hamilton and Warren) as a ‘‘moderate’’ nonattainment
area for the 1-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) as part of the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Area. See 56 FR 56694, effective January 6, 1992. The designation was based on the Area’s 1- hour ozone design value of 0.157 parts per million for the three year period of

1988–1990.

Pursuant to the requirements of section 182(b)(3) of the CAA, KDAQ developed the Kentucky Administrative Regulations (KAR) 401 KAR 59:174 Stage II controls at gasoline dispensing facilities, and submitted the rule to EPA for approval as part of Kentucky’s ozone SIP. The rule was adopted by Kentucky on January 12, 1998, and approved by EPA into the SIP on December 8, 1998.

See 63 FR 67586. Under this regulation, gasoline dispensing facilities with a monthly throughput of 25,000 gallons or more located in a Kentucky County in which the entire County is classified as severe, serious, or moderate nonattainment for ozone are required to install Stage II vapor recovery systems.

On October 29, 1999, having implemented all measures required of Kentucky to that date for moderate
ozone nonattainment areas under the CAA, and with three years of data (1996–1998) showing compliance with the 1-hour ozone standards, KDAQ
submitted to EPA an ozone maintenance plan and request for redesignation of the Kentucky portion of Cincinnati/ Northern Kentucky area to attainment status. The maintenance plan, as required under section 175A of the CAA, showed that nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds (VOC)
emissions in the Area would remain below the 1990 ‘‘attainment year’s’’ levels. In making these projections KDAQ factored in the emissions benefit (primarily VOC) of the Area’s Stage II program, and did not remove this program from the Kentucky SIP. The redesignation request and maintenance plan were approved by EPA, effective June 19, 2000 (65 FR 37879).

Since the Kentucky Stage II program was already in place and had been
included in the Commonwealth’s October 29, 1999, redesignation request and 1-hour ozone maintenance plan for the Area, KDAQ elected not to remove the program from the SIP at that time. On April 6, 1994, EPA promulgated regulations requiring the phase-in of onboard refueling vapor recovery (ORVR) systems on new motor vehicles. Under section 202(a)(6) of the CAA,
moderate ozone nonattainment areas are not required to implement Stage II vapor recovery programs after promulgation of
ORVR standards.

II. Analysis of the Commonwealth’s
Submittal

EPA’s primary consideration for determining the approvability of Kentucky’s request to exempt Stage II vapor control requirements for the Enterprise Holdings, Inc., facility


### 28778 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 95 / Thursday, May 16, 2013 / Proposed Rules

1 EPA subsequently clarified that the Tri-state
Cincinnati-Hamilton Area was classified unclassifiable/attainment for the 24-hour NAAQS promulgated in 1997. See 74 FR 58688 (November 13, 2009). 2 On May 16, 2012, EPA made a determination that ORVR was in widespread use throughout the motor vehicle fleet for purposes of controlling motor vehicle refueling emissions. EPA estimated that approximately 70 percent of all vehicles would be equipped with on-board systems to capture these vapors by the end of 2012, rendering the use of Stage II vapor recovery systems redundant. located at the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport in Boone County is whether this requested action complies with section 110(l) of the CAA. Below is EPA’s analysis of these
considerations.

a. Federal Requirements for Stage II

States were required to adopt Stage II
rules for all areas classified as
‘‘moderate’’ or worse under section 182(b)(3) of the CAA. However, section 202(a)(6) of the CAA states that ‘‘the requirements of section 182(b)(3) (relating to Stage II gasoline vapor recovery) for areas classified under
section 181 as moderate for ozone shall not apply after the promulgation of such [ORVR] standards.’’ ORVR regulations were promulgated by EPA on April 6,

1994. See 59 FR 16262, and 40 CFR 86.001, .098). As a result, the CAA no longer requires moderate areas to impose Stage II controls under section 182(b)(3), and such areas may seek SIP revisions to remove such requirements from their SIP, subject to section 110(l) of the Act. EPA’s policy memorandum related to ORVR, dated March 9, 1993, and June 23, 1993, provided further guidance on an allowance for removing Stage II requirements from certain areas. The policy memorandum dated March 9, 1993, states ‘‘[w]hen onboard rules are promulgated, a State may withdraw its Stage II rules for moderate areas from the SIP (or from consideration as a SIP revisions) consistent with its obligation under sections 182(b)(3) and 202(a)(6), so long as withdrawal will not interfere with any other applicable requirements of the Act.’’ Because Kentucky is taking credit for Stage II in its maintenance plan, the Commonwealth’s request for a source specific exemption from the State II vapor control requirements is subject to section 110(l) of the CAA.

Section 110(l) of the Act provides that EPA cannot approve a SIP revision if that revision interferes with any applicable requirement regarding attainment, reasonable further progress (RFP) or any requirement established in the CAA. EPA can approve a SIP
revision that removes or modifies
control measures in the SIP once states
make a ‘‘noninterference’’
demonstration that such a removal or
modification will not interfere with attainment of the NAAQS, RFP or any other CAA requirement. As such, Kentucky must make a demonstration of noninterference in order to exempt Stage II from the SIP for Enterprise Holdings, Inc. facility located at the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport in Boone County. b. Cincinnati-Hamilton Interstate Area Air Quality Status

With respect to ozone, on April 30, 2004, EPA designated the Cincinnati/ Northern Kentucky Area as
nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. See 69 FR 23857. On January 29, 2010, the Commonwealth submitted to EPA a redesignation request and maintenance plan for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. As a result the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky area was redesignated to attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS on August 5, 2010 (75 FR 4718). EPA then designated portions of Boone, Campbell and Kenton Counties in Kentucky as
nonattainment for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS as part of the Cincinnati/ Northern Kentucky Nonattainment Area. This designation for the 2008 8- hour ozone NAAQS was effective July

20, 2012. See 77 FR 30088.

With respect to PM, on July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated the first air quality
standards for PM 2.5 . EPA promulgated
an annual PM 2.5 standard at a level of 15 micrograms per cubic meter ( mg/m 3 ), based on a 3-year average of annual

mean PM 2.5 concentrations. In the same rulemaking, EPA promulgated a 24-hour
standard of 65 m g/m 3 , based on a 3-year average of the 98th percentile of 24-hour

PM 2.5 concentrations. On January 5, 2005, at 70 FR 944, and supplemented on April 14, 2005, at 70 FR 19844, EPA designated Boone, Campbell, and Kenton Counties in Kentucky as part of
the Tri-state Cincinnati-Hamilton
Nonattainment Area for the 1997 PM 2.5 NAAQS. 1

On January 27, 2011, KDAQ submitted a request to redesignate the Kentucky portion of the Tri-state
Cincinnati-Hamilton Area PM 2.5 Nonattainment Area to attainment for
the 1997 Annual PM 2.5 NAAQS based on 2007–2009 data. On December 15, 2011, EPA published the final rulemaking redesignating the Area to
attainment for the 1997 annual PM 2.5 NAAQS. See 76 FR 77904.

In 2006, EPA strengthened the primary and secondary 24-hour PM 2.5 NAAQS from 65 mg/m 3 to 35 mg/m 3 , and retained the current primary and secondary annual PM 2.5 NAAQS at 15

mg/m 3

. See 71 FR 61144, October 17,
2006. The revision of the 24-hour PM 2.5 NAAQS in 2006, triggered the designation process for the NAAQS. The Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Area was designated attainment for the 2006 PM 2.5 NAAQS. See 74 FR 58688, November 13, 2009.

c. Non-Interference Demonstration for Exemption of Stage II Requirements.

EPA is making the preliminary determination that Kentucky’s April 25, 2013, proposed source-specific revision to the Kentucky SIP is approvable based on the CAA and the December 12, 2006, EPA memorandum from Stephen D. Page entitled, ‘‘ Removal of Stage II Vapor Recovery in Situations Where Widespread use of On-board Refueling Vapor Recovery is Demonstrated,’’ which provides guidance to states concerning the removal of Stage II gasoline vapor recovery systems where
states demonstrate to EPA that widespread use of ORVR has occurred in specific portions of the motor vehicle
fleet.

As previously discussed, States were required to adopt Stage II rules for such areas under section 182(b)(3) of the CAA. However, section 202(a)(6) of the CAA provides that the requirements of section 182(b)(3) (relating to Stage II gasoline vapor recovery) for areas
classified as moderate for ozone shall not apply after the promulgation of ORVR standards. In addition, section 202(a)(6) further provides that the Administrator may, by rule, revise or waive the application of requirements of section 182(b)(3) for areas classified as serious, severe, or extreme for ozone.

Section 202 ORVR regulations were promulgated by EPA on April 6, 1992, and the requirements of these regulations were phased in. In this circumstance, EPA does not view section 202 as requiring a determination of ‘‘widespread’’ use as is necessary for the source-specific SIP revision for Stage II requirements for the Enterprise Holdings, Inc. facility because the area is not designated as serious or above for ozone. EPA, however, does view the widespread use analysis as relevant toward satisfying the section 110(l) demonstration necessary to exempt the Enterprise Holdings, Inc. facility from the Stage II vapor control requirements.

EPA believes the widespread use of ORVR has been sufficiently
demonstrated. 2 EPA’s December 12, 2006, memorandum states that if 95 percent of the vehicles in the fleet have ORVR, then widespread use will likely
have been demonstrated for that fleet.


### 28779 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 95 / Thursday, May 16, 2013 / Proposed Rules

The memorandum addresses the following specific fleets:

• Initial fueling of new vehicles at automobile assembly plants;

• Refueling of rental cars at rental car facilities; and

• Refueling of flexible fuel vehicles at E85 dispensing pumps.

Most large rental companies rent current model vehicles, that are equipped with ORVR and vehicle models are updated to current year models every year or two. The Commonwealth of Kentucky has confirmed that 100 percent of the fleet will be equipped with 2006 model year (first model year vehicles required to be equipped with ORVR) and newer vehicles at the Enterprise Holdings, Inc., facility at the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport in Boone County.

CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) prohibits facilities within the State from emitting any air pollutants in amounts which will contribute significantly to nonattainment in, or interfere with maintenance by, any other State with respect to any such national primary or secondary ambient air quality standards. The only pollutant emitted by refueling vehicles is VOC, which is a precursor of ozone, and its emissions are mitigated by the use of vehicles equipped with ORVR. EPA has preliminarily determined that Kentucky has adequately demonstrated that ORVR is in widespread use and that the Stage II requirements of the Kentucky SIP have been sufficiently supplanted by the ORVR such that exemption of the Enterprise Holdings, Inc., facility from the Stage II requirements would not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress or any other applicable requirement of the CAA.

III. Proposed Action

EPA is proposing to approve the aforementioned source-specific SIP revision request from Kentucky. VOC emissions from vehicles at Enterprise Holdings, Inc., facilities are controlled by ORVR, therefore, EPA has preliminarily concluded that removal of Stage II requirements at this facility
would not result in an increase of VOC emissions, and thus would not
contribute to ozone formation. The Commonwealth is seeking to remove this requirement for this facility and EPA has preliminarily determined that Kentucky has fully satisfied the requirements of section 110(l) of the CAA. Therefore, EPA is proposing to approve this source-specific SIP revision, as being consistent with
section 110 of the CAA. IV. Statutory and Executive Order

Reviews

Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, these proposed actions merely approve state law as meeting federal requirements and do not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by Commonwealth law. For that reason, these proposed actions:

• Are not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);

• do not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44

U.S.C. 3501 et seq. );

• are certified as not having a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5

U.S.C. 601 et seq. );

• do not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–4);

• do not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);

• are not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);

• are not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);

• are not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and

• do not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

In addition, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the Commonwealth, and it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Greenhouse Gas, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 7, 2013. A. Stanley Meiburg, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.

[FR Doc. 2013–11713 Filed 5–15–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND**
**SECURITY**

**Federal Emergency Management Agency** 

**44 CFR Part 67**

**[Docket ID FEMA–2013–0002: Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–B–1152]** 

**Proposed Flood Elevation Determinations for Armstrong County,**  **Pennsylvania (All Jurisdictions)**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule; withdrawal.

**SUMMARY :**  The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is withdrawing its proposed rule concerning proposed flood elevation determinations for Armstrong County, Pennsylvania (All Jurisdictions).

**DATES :**  This withdrawal is effective on May 16, 2013.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA–B–1152 to Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4064, or (email) Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4064, or (email) Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  On November 2, 2010, FEMA published a proposed rulemaking at 75 FR 67304, proposing flood elevation determinations along one or more flooding sources in Armstrong County, Pennsylvania. Because FEMA has or