alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dig In! iii • Grades 5-6 • http://teamnutrition.usda.gov

Overview

About this Curriculum .....................................................................................1-3

Food Safety Mini-Posters [teacher reproducibles] ....................................4-5

Dig In! At a Glance ...........................................................................................6-11

Lessons 

Lesson 1 The World of Edible Plants .....................................................12-18

Lesson 2 Farm to Plate ..............................................................................19-25

Lesson 3 Healthy From the Ground Up ...............................................26-31

Lesson 4 Seeking Out What We Need ................................................32-36

Lesson 5 Eat Your Colors ..........................................................................37-40

Lesson 6 The Global Garden ...................................................................41-45

Lesson 7 Chef Challenge ..........................................................................46-51

Lesson 8 Fruits and Veggies Many Ways ...........................................52-55

Lesson 9 The Power of Choice ...............................................................56-59

Lesson 10 Harvest Celebration! ...............................................................60-62

Student Handouts

Lesson 1 ............................................................................................................63-65

Lesson 2 ...........................................................................................................66-68

Lesson 3 ...........................................................................................................69-74

Lesson 4 ...........................................................................................................75-77

Lesson 5 ...........................................................................................................78-79

Lesson 6 ...........................................................................................................80-81

Lesson 7 ...........................................................................................................82-84

Lesson 8 ...........................................................................................................85-86

Lesson 9 ...........................................................................................................87-89

Lesson 10 .........................................................................................................90

Gardening Guide .............................................................................................91-107

Acknowledgments ...........................................................................................108

TABLE OF CONTENTS
#### § 8.4 Inventory.

The seizing agent shall prepare an inventory of any seized property.
### §543h. New spending authority

Any new spending authority described in subsection (c)(2)(A) or (B) of section 651 1 of title 2 which is provided under sections 543 to 543h of this title shall be effective for any fiscal year only to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in appropriation Acts.

(Pub. L. 98–425, title III, §309, Sept. 28, 1984, 98 Stat. 1638.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 651 of title 2, referred to in text, was amended by Pub. L. 105–33, title X, §10116(a)(3), (5), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 691, by striking out subsec. (c) and redesignating former subsec. (d) as (c).

1 See References in Text note below.
#### Samuel Glickauf *v.*Louis Hirschhorn *et al.*

1. *Pleading—plea to whole declaration must answer all.*A plea to the ■whole declaration which leaves a material averment unanswered, is bad on demurrer.

2. *Same—plea that time of payment was extended without consent of surety.*A plea by a surety, that the time of payment of the note sued on was extended by agreement with the principal debtor, without the knowledge of the surety, should show such a consideration for such agreement to extend the time, as to render it a valid, binding contract, and should also show the time to which the payment was extended.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. John Burns, Judge, presiding.

Mr. Allan C. Story, and Mr. Bufus King, for the appellant.

Mr. Philip Stein, for the appellees.

Mr. Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This is an appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county, from a judgment rendered by that court in an action of assumpsit, on three promissory notes. The declaration contained twelve counts, on all which issues were made up and tried by the court without a jury, resulting in a judgment for the plaintiff.

The controversy appears to be as to the nature of the liability of appellant, whether as indorser or guarantor of the payment of the notes.

As there is no bill of exceptions in the case, preserving the evidence, the same having been stricken from the record, we are unable to pronounce upon the propriety of the finding of the court; and, in the absence of evidence, ,we must presume the judgment of the court is correct, and that the evidence heard sustains the finding.

The questions of law raised by apjiellant are upon the ruling *575of the court upon plaintiff’s demurrer to defendants’ third and fourth pleas. The third plea was to the whole declaration, and answered only a part thereof, the averments of defendants’ guaranty being unanswered; and besides, the plea itself amounted to the general issue.

The fourth plea alleges, that when the note became due, plaintiffs, by agreement with the maker thereof, extended the time of payment of the same, without the knowledge or consent of defendant.

The defect in this plea is obvious. There is no consideration alleged for this extension of time, and being no consideration it was not a binding contract, and could not prevent a suit upon the note against the maker, notwithstanding the agreement. It was *mtdum pactum.*The plea is defective, also, in not stating the time to which payment was extended. An agreement of this kind, to exonerate the surety, must be a valid,and binding agreement. *Waters*v. Simpson, 2 Gilm. 570; *Warner*v. *Cr*ane, 20 Ill. 148; *Flynn*v. *Mudd et al.*27 ib. 323; *Galbraith v.*Fullerton, 53 ib. 126.

As to the fourth error assigned, it does not appear that any objection of this kind was made in the court below, and it is now too late. If it was an objection it was waived by going to trial. JSTor is it assigned as error, that a greater number of judges held the court than is allowed by the constitution.

Perceiving no error in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 69418 / April 19, 2013

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-14909

____________________________________

 :

In the Matter of :

 :

OPPENHEIMERFUNDS, INC. :

:

and : ORDER GRANTING

: EXTENSTION OF TIME

OPPENHEIMERFUNDS : TO SUBMIT PROPOSED

DISTRIBUTOR, INC., : PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

:

Respondents. :

____________________________________:

The Division of Enforcement (“Division”) has requested an extension of time, 

until June 10, 2013, to submit a proposed Plan of Distribution (“Plan”) in the abovecaptioned matter, under Rule 1101(a) of the Commission Rules on Fair Fund and 

Disgorgement Plans. 

On June 6, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) 

entered an Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings 

Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 15(b)(4) of the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934, Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 

1940, and Sections 9(b) and 9(f) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, Making 

Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order (“Order”). 

(Securities Act Rel. No. 9329, June 6, 2012). The Order required OppenheimerFunds, 

Inc. to pay $9,879,706 in disgorgement, $1,487,190 in prejudgment interest, and 

$24,000,000 in civil penalty into a Fair Fund and required the appointment of a Fund 
Administrator to develop and administer the Plan in accordance with the Commission 

Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans.

On March 14, 2013, the Commission issued an Order Appointing Fund 

Administrator and Approving Fund Administrator Bond (Exchange Act Rel. No. 

69138, March 14, 2013). After discussions with the Fund Administrator, the Division 

has determined that additional time is needed to submit the proposed Plan. 

Accordingly, for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 

Division’s request for an extension of time until June 10, 2013 to submit a proposed 

Plan is granted. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority. 

Elizabeth M. Murphy 

Secretary
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 379 

Supporting the designation of September 2019 as ‘‘National Alcohol and 

Drug Addiction Recovery Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 24, 2019 

Mr. KING (for himself, Mrs. CAPITO, and Mr. MANCHIN) submitted the 

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of September 2019 as ‘‘National 

Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month’’. 

Whereas the theme for National Alcohol and Drug Addiction 

Recovery Month in 2019 is ‘‘Join the Voices for Recovery: Together We Are Stronger’’; 

Whereas an estimated 68,000 people in the United States 

suffered a fatal overdose in 2018, with an average number of 186 fatal overdoses per day; 

Whereas there are roughly 23,000,000 people in the United 

States in recovery from alcohol and drug addiction; 

Whereas the estimated total cost to the economy of prescription opioid misuse is $78,500,000,000 annually, and includes the cost of healthcare, lost productivity, and involvement of the criminal justice system; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 379 ATS 

Whereas people with substance use disorder may face stigma 

from health professionals as well as friends and family; 

Whereas it has been demonstrated that stigma can be a barrier for people with substance use disorder to access 

treatment and engage in recovery; and 

Whereas peer-supported communities offer people with substance use disorder better success in recovery by addressing the personal and emotional effects of addiction and 

easing reintegration: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) recognizes the importance of education for 

3 the prevention of substance use disorder; 

4 (2) supports efforts to explore how integrated 

5 care, community, and sense of purpose can lead to 

6 effective and sustainable treatment; and 

7 (3) shows appreciation and gratitude for family 

8 members, friends, and other individuals who support 

9 individuals in recovery. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
§ 208.20 Determining if an asylum application is frivolous. ( a ) For applications filed on or after April 1, 1997, and before January 11, 2021, an applicant is subject to the provisions of section 208(d)(6) of the Act only if the alien received the notice required by section 208(d)(4)(A) of the Act and a final order by an immigration judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals specifically finds that the alien knowingly filed a frivolous asylum application. An application is frivolous if: ( 1 ) Any of the material elements in the asylum application is deliberately fabricated, and the immigration judge or the Board is satisfied that the applicant, during the course of the proceedings, has had sufficient opportunity to account for any discrepancies or implausible aspects of the claim.
( 2 ) Paragraphs (b) through (f) of this section shall only apply to applications filed on or after January 11, 2021.
( b ) For applications filed on or after January 11, 2021, an asylum officer may determine that the applicant knowingly filed a frivolous asylum application and may refer the applicant to an immigration judge on that basis, so long as the applicant has received the notice required by section 208(d)(4)(A) of the Act. For any application referred to an immigration judge, an asylum officer's determination that an application is frivolous will not render an applicant permanently ineligible for immigration benefits unless an immigration judge or the Board makes a finding of frivolousness as described in paragraph 1208.20(c).
( c ) For applications filed on or after January 11, 2021, an asylum application is frivolous if it: ( 1 ) Contains a fabricated material element;
( 2 ) Is premised upon false or fabricated evidence unless the application would have been granted without the false or fabricated evidence;
( 3 ) Is filed without regard to the merits of the claim; or
( 4 ) Is clearly foreclosed by applicable law.
( d ) If the alien has been provided the warning required by section 208(d)(4)(A) of the Act, he or she need not be given any additional or further opportunity to account for any issues with his or her claim prior to the entry of a frivolousness finding.
( e ) An asylum application may be found frivolous even if it was untimely filed.
( f ) A withdrawn asylum application may also be found frivolous unless: ( 1 ) The alien wholly disclaims the application and withdraws it with prejudice;
( 2 ) The alien is eligible for and agrees to accept voluntary departure for a period of no more than 30 days pursuant to section 240B(a) of the Act;
( 3 ) The alien withdraws any and all other applications for relief or protection with prejudice; and
( 4 ) The alien waives his right to appeal and any rights to file, for any reason, a motion to reopen or reconsider.
( g ) For purposes of this section, a finding that an alien knowingly filed a frivolous asylum application shall not preclude the alien from seeking withholding of removal under section 241(b)(3) of the Act or protection under the regulations issued pursuant to the Convention Against Torture's implementing legislation.
[85 FR 80389, Dec. 11, 2020]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-57138) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-32543,
333-60311, 333-80457 and 333-32868) of The Hertz Corporation of our report dated
January 16, 2001, except for Note 15, as to which the date is March 23, 2001,
relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.




                                     PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Florham Park, New Jersey
March 29, 2001
### §482o. Kaibab National Forest; mining rights; protection of scenic values

On and after July 12, 1951 mining locations made under the mining laws of the United States within the following-described lands within the Kaibab National Forest, Coconino County, Arizona:

Sections 2, 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, and 26, township 22 north, range 2 east;

Sections 1, 12, and 13, township 28 north, range 2 east;

Sections 1, 12, 13, 24, 25, and 36, township 29 north, range 2 east;

Sections 13, 24, 25, and 36, township 30 north, range 2 east;

Section 18, township 30 north, range 3 east;

Sections 12 and 13, township 30 north, range 5 east;

Sections 7, 18, 19, 29, 30, 32, and 33, township 30 north, range 6 east;

Sections 3 and 4, township 29 north, range 6 east, Gila and Salt River Base and meridian; and also those mining locations made under the mining laws of the United States on public domain lands within those particular sections of townships 23 north, 24 north, 25 north, 26 north, 27 north, and 28 north, all in range 2 east, Gila and Salt River Base and meridian, through which there extends Arizona State Highway numbered 64 and a strip of land one thousand feet wide on each side of the center line of the right-of-way thereof; shall confer on the locator the right to occupy and use so much of the surface of the land covered by the location as may be reasonably necessary to carry on prospecting, mining, and beneficiation of ores, including the taking of mineral deposits and timber required by or in the mining and ore-reducing operations, and no permit shall be required or charge made for such use or occupancy: Provided, however, That the cutting and removal of timber, except where clearing is necessary in connection with mining operations or to provide space for buildings or structures used in connection with mining operations, shall be conducted in accordance with the rules for timber cutting on adjoining national-forest land, or rules and regulations issued by the Secretary of the Interior under sections 482o to 482q of this title with respect to public domain lands under his jurisdiction, and no use of the surface of the claim or the resources therefrom not reasonably required for carrying on mining and prospecting shall be allowed except under the national-forest rules and regulations or rules and regulations of the Secretary of the Interior, as the case may be, nor shall the locator prevent or obstruct other occupancy of the surface or use of surface resources under authority of such regulations, or permits issued thereunder, if such occupancy or use is not in conflict with mineral development.

(July 12, 1951, ch. 222, §1, 65 Stat. 118.)
It’s that time of year -- the time to ring out the old and ring in the new, to ditch bad habits and replace them 

with good ones. We can’t guarantee you’ll lose weight, or become a better human being, but we can give you 

some suggestions to help you whip your finances into shape. Here are our top 11 tips for 2011.

1~ Save and invest. Don’t underestimate your ability to save and invest. 

With compound interest, even modest investments now can grow over time. 

2 ~ Lighten your credit load. Paying off high-interest debt may be your best 

investment strategy. Few investments pay off as well, or with less risk than, 

eliminating high-interest debt on credit cards or other loans. 

3 ~ Boost your “rainy-day” fund. Many experts recommend keeping about 

six months of expenses in a federally insured account to cover sudden unemployment or other emergencies.

4 ~ “Sure thing” is fine as an expression but not as an investment pitch. Promises of guaranteed high returns, with little or no risk, are a classic warning sign 

of fraud. The potential for greater returns typically comes with greater risk. 

You know the saying -- if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

5 ~ Take charge of your money. If you don’t know where it goes, start 

keeping track. There are plenty of tools to help you set a monthly budget 

and stick to it.

6 ~ Pay yourself first. Put yourself at the top of your “payee” list. 

Regular automatic deductions from your paycheck or bank account into a 

savings or investment account will keep you on track toward your short and 

long-term financial goals.

7 ~ Know your investment self. You’re the best judge of yourself. Use that 

knowledge to find investments that are a good match for you, based on 

your goals and your ability to tolerate risks.

8 ~ Make sure your older investments still fit you. Take time to review 

your holdings and see if they’re still appropriate for you. If you’ve outgrown 

them, it’s probably time to sell them and buy something better suited to 

you.

9 ~ Don’t put all your eggs in one basket. One way to reduce the risks of 

investing is to diversify your investment holdings. Think twice before investing 

heavily in shares of your employer’s stock or any single investment.

10 ~ Ignorance isn’t always bliss, especially when it comes to your account 

statements. Sure, it can hurt to look at statements when investments are losing 

value. But if you don’t review your statements, you may miss problems in your 

accounts that are unrelated to performance.

11 ~ Do your homework. Asking questions about financial opportunities and 

checking out the answers with unbiased sources can help you make informed 

choices and avoid fraud.

$

Top 11 Tips for 2011

$

www.investor.gov

Investor Bulletin
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.19

                                                 [ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC. LOGO]

January 11, 2000

On March 25, 1999 representatives of Hovione, SA and Allos Therapeutics, Inc.
signed a term sheet indicating the intent of Hovione and Allos to establish a
supply agreement and its anticipated terms. [ * ] during clinical development
and for a designated number of years after commercialization. [ * ]

This letter has two purposes: (1) To recognize that both parties still agree
that the terms in March 25, 1999 term sheet will form the basis of the
definitive contract and (2) that the terms contained in the term sheet will
function as a supply agreement until the definitive agreement is reached.


Acknowledged and Agreed


ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.                        HOVIONE INTER LIMITED


By: /s/ Stephen J. Hoffman, Ph.D., M.D.         By: /s/ Chry Villax
   ------------------------------------            -------------------------
   Stephen J. Hoffman, Ph.D., M.D.                 Chry Villax
   President & Chief Executive Officer             Chief Executive Officer

Date:  1/12/00                                  Date:  13th January 2000
     -----------                                     ---------------------


                      CONFIDENTIAL-[HOVIONE LOGO] HOVIONE


        7000 North Broadway, Suite 600 - Denver, CO 80231 - 303/426-6262
                                Fax 303/412-9160
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

VICTOR A. ORTIZ,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 142 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of September, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
**SECURITIESAND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington,D.C. 20549**
**FORM 10-KANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**
For the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2002                                                                          Commission file No. 1-10294

**HIBERNIACORPORATION**
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. ANTHONY KEFFER, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 59 WAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 20th day of May, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
----

(2004/C 88 E/0116)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2742/03

by Richard Corbett (PSE) to the Commission

(11 September 2003)

Subject:   Slovakia

Is the Commission aware that Slovakia still refuses entry onto its territory of EU citizens who present only an identity card, even children accompanied by their parents presenting a passport?

Does the Commission agree that this reflects poorly on Slovakia's attitude, as a country scheduled to join the Union in a few months time, especially when other countries in the vicinity, whether or not they are about to join the EU (such as Hungary, Croatia, Bosnia and even Serbia-Montenegro) have no difficulty in accepting identity cards issued by EU Member States as a valid proof of identity?

Answer given by Mr Verheugen on behalf of the Commission

(22 October 2003)

Union citizens may travel freely throughout the territory of the Union, simply by holding a valid passport or identity card. Until their accession to the Union, however, there is no obligation on Acceding Countries such as Slovakia or other non-Union states to allow entry onto their territory of Union citizens presenting only an identity card.

Equally, there is no reciprocal obligation on the part of current Member States to allow citizens of Acceding Countries entry onto their territory on simple presentation of an identity card.

The Honourable Member may be aware, for example, that the United Kingdom currently imposes a visa requirement on citizens from the Slovak Republic.

----