alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 387/7 Oc

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 387 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 657 October 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 387

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 657 October 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 387/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2022/C 387/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 13 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 387/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2022/C 387/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections

13

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
- 350 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 311 Nebraska Reports POPE v . DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES Cite as 311 Neb. 350

Colt M. Pope, appellant, v. Department of Motor Vehicles of the State of Nebraska, appellee. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed April 15, 2022. No. S-21-206.

supplemental opinion Appeal from the District Court for Clay County: Stephen R. Illingworth , Judge. Former opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overruled. T. Charles James, of Langvardt, Valle & James, P.C., L.L.O., for appellant.Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Milissa JohnsonWiles for appellee.
Heavican , C.J., Miller

- Lerman , Cassel , Stacy , Funke , Papik , and Freudenberg , JJ.
Per Curiam. This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the appellant, Colt M. Pope, concerning our opinion in Pope v. Department of Motor Vehicles , 310 Neb. 971, 969 N.W.2d 903 (2022). We overrule the motion, but modify the opinion as follows: In the analysis section, under the subheading “OTHER ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR,” we modify the fourth para

graph to add as the final sentence the following: “We make Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 06/13/2022 01:06 AM CDT- 351 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 311 Nebraska Reports POPE v . DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES Cite as 311 Neb. 350 no comment on any prohibitions or obligations under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 84-914(6) (Reissue 2014), as Pope has not assigned as error, nor has he argued he was prejudiced by, any purported violation of that statute.” The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified. Former opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overruled.
### §683. Areas set aside for protection of game and fish; unlawfully taking game or fish

The President of the United States is authorized to designate such areas on any lands which have been, or which may hereafter be, purchased by the United States under the provisions of the Act of March first, nineteen hundred and eleven, and Acts supplementary thereto and amendatory thereof, as should, in his opinion, be set aside for the protection of game animals, birds, or fish; and, except under such rules and regulations as the Secretary of Agriculture may from time to time prescribe, it shall be unlawful for any person to hunt, catch, trap, willfully disturb or kill any kind of game animal, game or nongame bird, or fish, or take the eggs of any such bird on any lands so set aside, or in or on the waters thereof.

(Aug. 11, 1916, ch. 313, 39 Stat. 476; June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §10, 62 Stat. 860.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of March first, nineteen hundred and eleven, referred to in text, was in the original "Act of March first, nineteen hundred and eleven (Thirty-six Statutes at Large, page nine hundred and sixty-one), entitled 'An Act to enable any State to cooperate with any other State or States, or with the United States, for the protection of watersheds of navigable streams, and to appoint a commission for the acquisition of lands for the purpose of conserving the navigability of navigable streams' ", which is popularly known as the Weeks Law, and which enacted former sections 513 and 514 and sections 515 to 519, 521, 552, and 563 of this title and amended sections 480 and 500 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 552 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1948—Act June 25, 1948, struck out penal provisions (see section 41 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure), and inserted provision relating to the unlawfulness in hunting, catching, etc. game animals, etc. under rules and regulations of Secretary of Agriculture.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1948 Amendment

Section 20 of act June 25, 1948, provided that the amendment made by that act is effective Sept. 1, 1948.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Presidential Designation

The following areas have been designated by the President:

Big Levels Game Refuge. Proclamation of July 6, 1935 (49 Stat. 3448).

Cherokee National Game Refuges. Proclamation of Aug. 5, 1924 (43 Stat. 1964), and Oct. 22, 1934 (49 Stat. 3423).

National Catahoula Wildlife Management Preserve. Proclamation of Sept. 27, 1941 (55 Stat. 1689).

National Red Dirt Wildlife Management Preserve. Proclamation of Sept. 27, 1941 (55 Stat. 1688).

Noontootly National Game Refuge. Proclamation of July 6, 1938 (52 Stat. 1549).

Pisgah National Game Preserve. Proclamation of Oct. 17, 1916 (39 Stat. 1811).
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 34-90373 / November 6, 2020

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-19927

In the Matter of

SUPER MICRO COMPUTER, 

INC.,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING 

File No. 3-19928

In the Matter of

HOWARD HIDESHIMA,

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

By order dated February 22, 2019, the Commission issued the “Omnibus Order 

Directing the Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that 

Establish Distribution Funds” (“Omnibus Order”),1authorizing the Secretary to issue 

orders for calendar years 2019-2021 appointing, upon request by the Commission staff, 

Miller Kaplan Arase LLP (“Miller Kaplan”), a certified public accounting firm, with one 

of their offices located in San Fransciso, California, as tax administrator (“Tax 

Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund may incur 

tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department of 

the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On November 5, 2020, the Commission staff requested, pursuant to the 

Omnibus Order, the appointment of Miller Kaplan as the Tax Administrator for the 

QSF in the above-referenced proceeding. 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 85174 (Feb. 22, 2019).
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Miller Kaplan, pursuant to and in accordance 

with the Omnibus Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the abovereferenced proceeding. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary
§ 661.35 What percentage of TTFBP funding is available for use on BIA and Tribally owned TTF bridges, and for non-BIA/non-Tribally owned TTF bridges? ( a ) Up to 80 percent of the available funding made available for PE and construction in any fiscal year will be eligible for use on BIA and Tribally owned TTF bridges. The remaining funding in any fiscal year will be made available for PE and construction for use on non-BIA/non-Tribally owned TTF bridges.
( b ) At various times during the fiscal year, FHWA will review the projects awaiting funding and may shift funds between BIA and Tribally owned, and non-BIA/non-Tribally owned bridge projects to maximize the number of projects funded and the overall effectiveness of the program.
#### Margaret Virginia, Respondent, v. Maurice F. Draye et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA-2013-0667

Directorate Identifier: 2013NM062AD

747-53A2844 --- 9/15/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Hawkins, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended April 1, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R. Hawkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ John R. HawkinsJohn R. HawkinsChief Executive OfficerJune 15, 2007


---
##### 



Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-57138) and on Form S-8 (File Nos.
333-32543, 333-60311, 333-80457 and 333-32868) of The Hertz Corporation of our
report dated January 14, 2002, relating to the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.



| | PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
| | --------------------------

Florham Park, New Jersey
March 27, 2002
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of BlastGard International, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the company on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the companys financial condition and results of operations.



May 21, 2009





|                                         | 
|---------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ ANDREW MCKINNON                      | 
|Andrew McKinnon, Chief Executive Officer |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 96435 / December 1, 2022

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-20932

In the Matter of

Health Insurance Innovations, Inc., 

now named Benefytt Technologies, 

Inc., and Gavin D. Southwell,

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER APPOINTING 

TAX ADMINISTRATOR

On May 4, 2022, the Commission issued an Omnibus Order Directing the Engagement of 

Two Tax Administrators for Appointment on a Case-By-Case Basis in Administrative 

Proceedings that Establish Distribution Funds (the “Omnibus Order”).1 The Omnibus Order 

engaged Miller Kaplan Arase LLP and Heffler, Radetich & Saitta, LLP to serve as the 

Commission’s tax administrator (“Tax Administrator”), for selection and appointment on an 

individual case basis, for calendar years 2022 through 2024 in administrative proceedings where 

the distribution fund may incur tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) 

under the Department of the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

The Director of the Division of Enforcement is authorized to appoint a Tax Administrator 

pursuant to the Omnibus Order.2 The Commission staff has requested the appointment of Miller 

Kaplan Arase LLP as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the Omnibus Order, Miller Kaplan Arase 

LLP is appointed as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding.

For the Commission, by the Division of Enforcement, pursuant to delegated authority.3

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 94845 (May 4, 2022).

2

 See Delegation of Authority to Director of the Division of Enforcement, Securities Act Rel. No. 10900 (Dec. 10, 

2020).

3

 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(21)(ii).
### §460lll–21. Land and resource management plan

#### (a) In general

As soon as practicable after the effective date of the transfer of jurisdiction under section 460lll–41 of this title, the Secretary shall prepare a land and resource management plan for the Recreation Area in conformity with the National Forest Management Act of 1976 (16 U.S.C. 472a et seq.) and other applicable law.

#### (b) Interim provision

Until adoption of the land and resource management plan, the Secretary may use, as appropriate, the existing Tennessee Valley Authority Natural Resource Management Plan to provide interim management direction. Use of all or a portion of the management plan by the Secretary shall not be considered to be a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.

(Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(e) [title V, §521], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–231, 2681–314.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Forest Management Act of 1976, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 94–588, Oct. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 2949, which enacted sections 472a, 521b, 1600, and 1611 to 1614 of this title, amended sections 500, 515, 516, 518, 576b, and 1601 to 1610 of this title, repealed sections 476, 513, and 514 of this title, and enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 476, 513, 528, 594–2, and 1600 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1976 Amendment note set out under section 1600 of this title and Tables.
### §583. Establishment of sustained-yield units to stabilize forest industries, employment, communities and taxable wealth

In order to promote the stability of forest industries, of employment, of communities, and of taxable forest wealth, through continuous supplies of timber; in order to provide for a continuous and ample supply of forest products; and in order to secure the benefits of forests in maintenance of water supply, regulation of stream flow, prevention of soil erosion, amelioration of climate, and preservation of wildlife, the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior are severally authorized to establish by formal declaration, when in their respective judgments such action would be in the public interest, cooperative sustained-yield units which shall consist of federally owned or administered forest land under the jurisdiction of the Secretary establishing the unit and, in addition thereto, land which reasonably may be expected to be made the subject of one or more of the cooperative agreements with private landowners authorized by section 583a of this title.

(Mar. 29, 1944, ch. 146, §1, 58 Stat. 132.)
Case 17-34665-KLP Doc 6835 Filed 04/04/19 Entered 04/04/19 13:21:10 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case 17-34665-KLP Doc 6835 Filed 04/04/19 Entered 04/04/19 13:21:10 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Liska Biometry,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Manoj Hippola, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my best
knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By:      /s/ Manoj Hippola
         Manoj Hippola
         CFO

Dated:  August 15, 2005
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** JUDGMENT No. 04 - 18 - 00509 - CV & 04 - 18 - 00844 - CV TITLE SOURCE, INC. , et al., Appellants v. HOUSECANARY , INC. , f/k/a Canary Analytics, Inc., Appellee From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016 - CI - 06300 Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION , JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the order of the trial court dated July 3, 2018, which is the subject of appeal No. 04 - 18 - 00509 - CV, is REVERSED, and judgment is RENDERED denying HouseCanary’s Motion to Reconsider Whether to Seal Certain Core Materials. Further, in accordan ce with the court’s opinion of this date, appeal No. 04 - 18 - 00844 - CV is DISMISSED AS MOOT. It is ORDERED that appellants Title Source, Inc., the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, and the Houston Forward Times recover their costs of these appeal s from appellee HouseCanary, Inc., f/k/a Canary Analytics, Inc. SIGNED July 10, 2019.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0001316 15-NOV-2016 09:37 AM
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Hall Court, Inc., Respondent, against Commissioner of Assessment and Taxation of the City of Troy et al., Appellants.

Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Sehenck, J., dissents, in a memorandum. Sehenck, J. (dissenting) . Relator’s expert has found the market value of this property to be the sales price. This property was not sold under ordinary circumstances in ordinary times, and clearly, the sales price alone cannot be the basis for the establishment of a market value. Reproduction cost less depreciation is an element that should *700have been considered *(People ex rel. Parklin Operating Corp.*v. *Miller,*287 *N.*Y. 126), as well as rent received, location, condition of repair, accessibility and *“*all other elements which may be fairly considered as affecting the market value of real property in a given neighborhood.” *(Heiman*v. *Bishop,*272 N. Y. 83.) “ In appraising the value of land and buildings a conclusion should be reached after consideration of the quality and method of construction, the depreciation, the profitableness of its use, present and prospective, and the market value as shown by sales in the vicinity.” *(Matter of Meleroft Corp.*v. *Weise,*256 App. Div. 291.) The effect of the financial depression since 1929 is a- proper element to be taken into consideration in fixing present market value. *(People ex rel. Amal. Properties, Inc.,*v. *Sutton,*274 N. Y. 309; *Great Northern R. Co.*v. *Weeks,*297 U. S. 135.) Relator has failed to meet the burden of proof that there was overvaluation or inequality of assessment and has presented no evidence of market value except the sales price of the particular property, the assessment of which is under review. This, in itself, is insufficient. *(People ex rel. Willey*v. *Carmichael,*256 App. Div. 421; *People ex rel. Arlene Apartments, Inc.,*v. *Heidel,*256 App. Div. 885.) The order and judgment should be reversed and writ of certiorari dismissed.
Editorial Note on Part 1240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1240 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10355, Mar. 3, 2003.

§ 1240.50 Decision of the immigration judge. ( a ) *Contents.* The decision of the immigration judge may be oral or written. Except when deportability is determined on the pleadings pursuant to § 1240.48(b), the decision of the immigration judge shall include a finding as to deportability. The formal enumeration of findings is not required. The decision shall also contain the reasons for granting or denying the request. The decision shall be concluded with the order of the immigration judge.
( b ) *Summary decision.* Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, in any case where deportability is determined on the pleadings pursuant to § 1240.48(b) and the respondent does not make an application under § 1240.49, or the respondent applies for voluntary departure only and the immigration judge grants the application, the immigration judge may enter a summary decision on Form EOIR-7, Summary Order of Deportation, if deportation is ordered, or on Form EOIR-6, Summary Order of Voluntary Departure, if voluntary departure is granted with an alternate order of deportation.
( c ) *Order of the immigration judge.* The order of the immigration judge shall direct the respondent's deportation, or the termination of the proceedings, or such other disposition of the case as may be appropriate. When deportation is ordered, the immigration judge shall specify the country, or countries in the alternate, to which respondent's deportation shall be directed. The immigration judge is authorized to issue orders in the alternative or in combination as he or she may deem necessary.