alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16399-16400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6766]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings <greek-i>2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following qualifying 
facility filings:

    Docket Numbers: QF11-158-000.
    Applicants: Alcor Energy Solutions, LLC.
    Description: Form 556 of Alcor Energy Solutions, LLC.
    Filed Date: 02/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110228-5120.
    Comment Date: None Applicable.

    Docket Numbers: QF11-160-000.
    Applicants: Peak Oilfield Service Company.
    Description: Form 556 of Peak Oilfield Service Company under QF11-
160.
    Filed Date: 03/02/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110302-5058.
    Comment Date: None Applicable.

    As it relates to any qualifying facility filings, the notices of 
self-certification [or self-recertification] listed above, do not 
institute a proceeding regarding qualifying facility status. A notice 
of self-certification [or self-recertification] simply provides 
notification that the entity making the filing has determined the 
facility named in the notice meets the applicable criteria to be a 
qualifying facility. Intervention and/or protest do not lie in dockets 
that are qualifying facility self-certifications or self-
recertifications. Any person seeking to challenge such qualifying 
facility status

[[Page 16400]]

may do so by filing a motion pursuant to 18 CFR 292.207(d)(iii). 
Intervention and protests may be filed in response to notices of 
qualifying facility dockets other than self-certifications and self-
recertifications.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the 
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the 
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance 
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#90d6d5c2d3dffefcf9fef5c3e5e0e0ffe2e4d0f6f5e2f3bef7ffe6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="21676473626e4f4d484f44725451514e535561474453420f464e57">[email protected]</span></a> 
or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: March 14, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-6766 Filed 3-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Mis Abuelitos

• Todos los adultos con trastornos de salud crónicos 

como el asma, la diabetes (tipo 1 y 2) y las 

enfermedades cardíacas, deben vacunarse contra 

la gripe (influenza) todos los años. 

• La neumonía es una complicación grave de 

la gripe.

• Algunas de las tasas más altas de hospitalización 

y muerte por causa de la gripe se registran en 

personas de más de 65 años. 

PARA USO OFICIAL

Para más información en 

español visite:

http://www.cdc.gov/flu
### §6543. Watershed Condition Framework

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service (referred to in this section as the "Secretary"), may establish and maintain a Watershed Condition Framework for National Forest System land—

(1) to evaluate and classify the condition of watersheds, taking into consideration—

(A) water quality and quantity;

(B) aquatic habitat and biota;

(C) riparian and wetland vegetation;

(D) the presence of roads and trails;

(E) soil type and condition;

(F) groundwater-dependent ecosystems;

(G) relevant terrestrial indicators, such as fire regime, risk of catastrophic fire, forest and rangeland vegetation, invasive species, and insects and disease; and

(H) other significant factors, as determined by the Secretary;

(2) to identify for protection and restoration up to 5 priority watersheds in each National Forest, and up to 2 priority watersheds in each national grassland, taking into consideration the impact of the condition of the watershed condition on—

(A) wildfire behavior;

(B) flood risk;

(C) fish and wildlife;

(D) drinking water supplies;

(E) irrigation water supplies;

(F) forest-dependent communities; and

(G) other significant impacts, as determined by the Secretary;

(3) to develop a watershed protection and restoration action plan for each priority watershed that—

(A) takes into account existing restoration activities being implemented in the watershed; and

(B) includes, at a minimum—

(i) the major stressors responsible for the impaired condition of the watershed;

(ii) a set of essential projects that, once completed, will address the identified stressors and improve watershed conditions;

(iii) a proposed implementation schedule;

(iv) potential partners and funding sources; and

(v) a monitoring and evaluation program;

(4) to prioritize protection and restoration activities for each watershed restoration action plan;

(5) to implement each watershed protection and restoration action plan; and

(6) to monitor the effectiveness of protection and restoration actions and indicators of watershed health.

#### (b) Coordination

In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary shall—

(1) coordinate with interested non-Federal landowners and State, Tribal, and local governments within the relevant watershed; and

(2) provide for an active and ongoing public engagement process.

#### (c) Emergency designation

Notwithstanding paragraph (2) of subsection (a), the Secretary may identify a watershed as a priority for rehabilitation in the Watershed Condition Framework without using the process described in that subsection if a Forest Supervisor determines that—

(1) a wildfire has significantly diminished the condition of the watershed; and

(2) the emergency stabilization activities of the Burned Area Emergency Response Team are insufficient to return the watershed to proper function.

(Pub. L. 108–148, title III, §304, as added Pub. L. 115–334, title VIII, §8405(a), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4843.)
# Official Journal C 119/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 119 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 647 April 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 119

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 647 April 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 119/01 | Communication from the Commission concerning the visual appearance of the label on EU fertilising products referred to in Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 of the European Parliament and of the Council | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 119/01

Communication from the Commission concerning the visual appearance of the label on EU fertilising products referred to in Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 of the European Parliament and of the Council

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
### §580n. Protection and development of forest or other vegetative cover; establishment and maintenance of conservation measures; coordination of programs and policies

In order to carry out the national policy declared in section 580m of this title, the Chief of Engineers, under the supervision of the Secretary of the Army, shall provide for the protection and development of forest or other vegetative cover and the establishment and maintenance of other conservation measures on reservoir areas under his jurisdiction, so as to yield the maximum benefit and otherwise improve such areas. Programs and policies developed pursuant to the preceding sentence shall be coordinated with the Secretary of Agriculture, and with appropriate State conservation agencies.

(Pub. L. 86–717, §2, Sept. 6, 1960, 74 Stat. 817.)
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SINOCUBATE, INC.




/s/ Tom Simeo

Date: August 11, 2011Tom Simeo

Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer

Director and Secretary
#### Alton S. EDWARDS, Appellant, v. LONGVIEW FIBRE CO.; Local # 970 Teamster Union, Appellees.

No. 02-1666.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 2, 2002.

Filed May 16, 2002.

Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

After Longview Fibre Company terminated Alton S. Edwards’s employment, Edwards filed a complaint in federal district court in April 2000 alleging illegal race and age discrimination. In January 2002, the district court dismissed Edwards’s case because of Edwards’s failure to comply with court orders and observe relevant procedural rules of the court. Edwards appeals the district court’s dismissal of his case with prejudice and denial of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

Edwards is proceeding pro se. Although we construe Edwards’s arguments liberally, we cannot find in Edwards’s documents any evidence which would contradict the magistrate judge’s findings. Edwards refused to provide the required prediscovery disclosures, respond to Long-view Fibre’s discovery requests, pay the sanction the court imposed or offer evi*514dence to show he cannot pay the sanction, and produce factual support for his claims. Based on these facts, we affirm the district court’s decision to dismiss Edwards’s case with prejudice. Further, we grant Edwards’s request for in forma pauperis status on appeal.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-0514

_____________________________

RAKESH VERMA,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

March 11, 2019

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004). 

WETHERELL, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Rakesh Verma, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 10.19

                                   AMENDMENT
              HILTON HOTELS SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN


         WHEREAS, Hilton Hotels Corporation (the "Company") maintains the 
Hilton Hotels Supplmental Executive Retirement Plan ("Plan"); and

         WHEREAS, the Company has the right to amend the Plan; and

         WHEREAS, the Company has resolved that benefit accruals under the 
Plan should be frozen effective December 31, 1996 for all Participants;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

         1.   The definition of Average Earnings contained in Section 2.4 is 
amended by adding the following to the end of the section:  

    "Because of the benefit freeze effective December 31, 1996, as set forth in
    Section 4.5, Average Earnings shall be calculated only with respect to
    calendar years ending on or before December 31, 1996." 

         2.   The following new Section 4.5 is hereby added:



<PAGE>

    "4.5 -- BENEFIT FREEZE.  Effective January 1, 1997, no further benefits
    shall be accrued by any Participant in this Plan.  Accordingly, each
    Participant in this Plan shall be entitled to the benefit he or she earned
    through and including December 31, 1996, but shall not be credited with any
    additional benefit following December 31, 1996.  Thus, by way of
    illustration and not limitation, Participants shall be entitled to Monthly
    Retirement Income benefits based only upon their years of service through
    December 31, 1996, and shall not be entitled to benefits based upon any
    portion of a year of service following December 31, 1996.  As a further
    illustration, and not a limitation, increases in a Participant's Average
    Earnings based upon earnings paid after December 31, 1996 shall not be
    considered under the Plan.  All early retirement benefits, deferred vested
    benefits and Spouse's Benefits shall be calculated based upon the frozen
    benefit earned through December 31, 1996."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is hereby adopted this ____ day of
November, 1996.


                                     HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION



                                     By_______________________

                                     Its______________________


                                      2
EXHIBIT 10.12

                            UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

$20,000                                                     Miami Beach, Florida
                                                                October 27, 1999

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned promises to pay to the order of YUPI
INTERNET INC. and/or assigns, the principal sum of Forty Thousand dollars
($20,000) together with interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum,
until maturity, said payment to be in one lump sum of principal and interest for
Forty three thousand two hundred dollars ($21,600), lawful money of the United
States of America is due on October 26, 2000.

This note shall be repayable in whole or in part at any time without penalty.
This note may not be assumed without the consent of YUPI INTERNET INC.

Each maker and endorser severally waives demand, protest and notice of maturity,
non-payment or protest and all requirements necessary to hold each of them
liable as makers and endorsers.

Each maker and endorser further agrees, jointly and severally, to pay all costs
of collection, including a reasonable attorney's fee in case the principal of
this note and the interest thereon is not paid at the maturity date, or in case
it becomes necessary to protect the security thereof, whether suit be brought or
not.

/S/  RUDY VILA
-------------------------
By Rudy Vila
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eric Bernard HOPE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-6089.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2002.

Decided May 23, 2002.

Eric Bernard Hope, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Eric Bernard Hope seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See United States v. Hope,*Nos. CR-99-7-V; CA-01-51-3-V-1 (W.D.N.C. filed Dec. 19, 2001, entered Dee. 20, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
### §428h. Ascertaining and marking line of battle

It shall be lawful for the authorities of any State having troops engaged in the Battle of Fort Donelson to enter upon the lands and approaches of the Fort Donelson National Battlefield for the purpose of ascertaining and marking the lines of battle of troops engaged therein: Provided, That before any such lines are permanently designated, the position of the lines and the proposed methods of marking them by monuments, tablets, or otherwise shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Interior and shall first receive the written approval of the Secretary.

(Mar. 26, 1928, ch. 248, §9, 45 Stat. 368; Ex. Ord. No. 6166, §2, June 10, 1933; Ex. Ord. No. 6228, §1, July 28, 1933; Pub. L. 86–738, §§4, 5, Sept. 8, 1960, 74 Stat. 876.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Fort Donelson National Battlefield" substituted in text for "Fort Donelson National Military Park" in view of redesignation of Fort Donelson National Military Park as Fort Donelson National Battlefield by Pub. L. 86–738. See section 428n of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Transfer of administrative functions of park, see note set out under section 428 of this title.
#### § 1200.62 Pre-2013 fiscal year grants.

Highway safety grants rescinded by MAP-21 are governed by the applicable implementing regulations at the time of grant award.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 92812 / August 30, 2021

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension of trading 

in the securities of GRAND PERFECTA, INC. (GPIW) commencing at 9:30 a.m. EDT on 

August 31, 2021 and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on September 14, 2021.

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of the foregoing company due 

to a lack of current and accurate information about the company because it has not filed certain 

periodic reports with the Commission. This order was entered pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).

The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders and prospective purchasers that they 

should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available 

information and any information subsequently issued by this company.

Brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11, at 

the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered relating to the securities 

of the subject company unless and until the broker or dealer has strictly complied with all of the 

provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by the rule, it 

should refrain from entering quotations relating to the securities of this company that has been 

subject to the trading suspension until such time as it has familiarized itself with the rule and is 

certain that all of its provisions have been met. Any broker or dealer with questions regarding

the rule should contact the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, DC 

at (202) 551-5777. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of the rule,

the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action. 

If any broker, dealer or other person has any information which may relate to this matter, they 

should immediately communicate it to the Delinquent Filings Branch of the Division of 

Enforcement at (202) 551-5466, or by e-mail at DelinquentFilings@sec.gov.
### §450dd. De Soto National Memorial; establishment

For the purpose of establishing an appropriate memorial to Hernando De Soto, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized, in his discretion, to acquire on behalf of the United States, by donation, by purchase with donated funds when purchaseable 1 at prices deemed by him reasonable, or by condemnation with donated funds, such lands and interests in land within an area of not to exceed thirty acres as he may select in the vicinity of Tampa Bay and Bradenton, Florida, and to construct thereon a suitable memorial structure, together with such connecting roads and public facilities as may be desirable.

(Mar. 11, 1948, ch. 109, §1, 62 Stat. 78; Pub. L. 86–728, §1A, Sept. 8, 1960, 74 Stat. 856.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1960—Pub. L. 86–728 increased limitation on acquisition of land from twenty-five to thirty acres.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Authorization of Appropriations

Section 3 of act Mar. 11, 1948, as amended Aug. 21, 1950, ch. 768, 64 Stat. 469; Sept. 8, 1960, Pub. L. 86–728, §1B, 74 Stat. 856; Nov. 10, 1978, Pub. L. 95–625, title I, §101(8), 92 Stat. 3471; Oct. 12, 1979, Pub. L. 96–87, title IV, §401(a), 93 Stat. 665, provided that: "There is hereby authorized to be appropriated such sums, not to exceed $292,000, as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this Act [sections 450dd and 450dd–1 of this title]."

1 So in original. Probably should be "purchasable".
From: Kevin Vuilleumier/R5/USEPA/US To: Steven Rosenthal/R5/USEPA/US@EPA, William Wagner/R5/USEPA/US@EPA, Cc: Molly DeSalle/R5/USEPA/US@EPA, Patrick Miller/R5/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 01/30/2013 11:35 AM Subject: CEMS installation timing in FIP
NSPS and NESHAPS CEMS installation timing requirements

. 40 CFR 60.13(b): All continuous monitoring systems and monitoring devices shall be installed prior to conducting performance tests under 60.8. 40 CFR 60.8(a): ...within 60 days after achieving the maximum production rate at which the affected facility will be operated, but not later than 180 days after initial startu p of such facility, ... or at such other times as may be required by the Administrator..., the owner or operator of such facility shall conduct performance tests and furnish the Administrator a written report of the results of such performance test(s).
So, following this progression, CEMS required by NSPS regulations must be installed "within 60 days after achieving maximum production but not later than 180 days after initial startup". I will note that this is NSPS and it applies to more than 8 facilities (for the most part). 63.8(c)(3): CEMS must be installed, operational and data verified either prior to or in conjunction with performance testing under 60.7 60.7(a)(2): Performance testing must be conducted within 180 days of the compliance date of a rule. For this I'll note CEMS would really need to be installed prior to the performance testing because a facility would not be able to certify the monitor during the stack test if the CEMS wasn't installed before the stack test is conducted. Also, while NSPS refers to new sources (although classifying a facility as a new source versus existing source has little or no impact on the ability to install CEMS in a timely manner) MACT applies to new and existing sources and still requires installation within 6 months.

-----Forwarded by Kevin Vuilleumier/R5/USEPA/US on 12/03/2012 09:18AM ----- To: Kevin Vuilleumier/R5/USEPA/US From: Dan Bivins/RTP/USEPA/US Date: 11/30/2012 07:42AM Cc: Barrett Parker/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Steffan Johnson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Robin Segall/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Kim Garnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Subject: Re: Proposed Timeline for CEMS installation Kevin, I went back to our CEMS cost model for gas CEMS and we used about 250 total hours time for all people involved for planning, selecting equipment, bids and purchasing, etc up until time to install. Then we had about 278 hours total time for plant to install. Then 85 hours for everything else. Sooooo.......total hours is 613 hours and if all was done consecutively by one person it would be a max of about 4 months (assuming a 40 hr work week). Let's say you doubled it to 8 months or even a year that far less than the 18 months they estimate. The fact is that some of this work can be done simultaneously. For example, hiring a consultant for QA/QC plan can be done while process to obtain vendor is going on and plant can begin prep work for installation while CEMS is being built, etc. I cc'd some other folks in case they may have some insight. Dan