alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Alexandria Division

IN RE: )

)

ELIZABETH H. COOMES ) Case No. 17-13497-BFK

)

) Chapter 7

)

MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

Comes now Fisher-Sandler, LLC, as counsel for Debtor Elizabeth H. Coomes, and in

support of their Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, states the following:

1) Mrs. Coomes bankruptcy case has been dismissed with prejudice by this Honorable

Court (docket entry 98).

2) Mrs. Coomes is contemplating the appeal of this decision to the U.S. District Court. 

Fisher-Sandler, LLC was hired to represent her in her chapter 13 bankruptcy case, but not retained

for appellate matters.

3) Mrs. Coomes has signed the order to allow Fisher-Sandler, LLC to withdraw from

this case.

WHEREFORE, Fisher-Sandler, LLC requests permission to withdraw as counsel of record

for the Elizabeth H. Coomes.

Respectfully Submitted,

Michael J. O. Sandler

1

Case 17-13497-BFK Doc 102 Filed 07/16/18 Entered 07/16/18 15:22:37 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
FISHER-SANDLER, LLC

/s/ Michael J. O. Sandler______

Michael J. O. Sandler, VSB #46443

12801 Darby Brooke Court, Suite 201

Woodbridge, Virginia 22192

(703) 967-3315

Counsel for Elizabeth H. Coomes

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that the foregoing was sent by first-class mail on the 16thday of July, 2018,

to the following:

Elizabeth H. Coomes

210 Cornwall Street, NW

Leesburg, VA 20176

Thomas P. Gorman, Trustee

300 N. Washington Street, Suite 400

Alexandria, VA 22314

/s/ Michael J. O. Sandler______ 

Michael J. O. Sandler

2

Case 17-13497-BFK Doc 102 Filed 07/16/18 Entered 07/16/18 15:22:37 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
#### Charles I. Menczer and Universal Metal Bed Company, Respondents, v. Jacob J. Melniker and Jacob Lipman, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 58 (Friday, March 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16845-16846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7067]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Administrator's Line of Succession Designation, No. 1-A, Revision 
32

    This document replaces and supersedes ``Line of Succession 
Designation No. 1-A, Revision 31.''

Line of Succession Designation No. 1-A, Revision 32

    Effective immediately, the Administrator's Line of Succession 
Designation is as follows:
    (a) In the event of my inability to perform the functions and 
duties of my position, or my absence from the office, the Deputy 
Administrator will assume all functions and duties of the 
Administrator. In the event the Deputy Administrator and I are both 
unable to perform the functions and duties of the position or are 
absent from our offices, I designate the officials in listed order 
below, if they are eligible to act as Administrator under the 
provisions of the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, to serve as 
Acting Administrator with full authority to perform all acts which the 
Administrator is authorized to perform:
    (1) Chief of Staff;
    (2) General Counsel;
    (3) Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance;

[[Page 16846]]

    (4) Regional Administrator for Region 8.
    (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of SBA Standard Operating 
Procedure 00 01 2,``absence from the office,'' as used in reference to 
myself in paragraph (a) above, means the following:
    (1) I am not present in the office and cannot be reasonably 
contacted by phoneor other electronic means, and there is an immediate 
business necessity for the exercise of my authority; or
    (2) I am not present in the office and, upon being contacted by 
phone or otherelectronic means, I determine that I cannot exercise my 
authority effectively without being physically present in the office.
    (c) An individual serving in an acting capacity in any of the 
positions listed in subparagraphs (a) (1) through (4), unless 
designated as such by the Administrator, is not also included in this 
Line of Succession. Instead, the next non-acting incumbent in the Line 
of Succession shall serve as Acting Administrator.
    (d) This designation shall remain in full force and effect until 
revoked or superseded in writing by the Administrator, or by the Deputy 
Administrator when serving as Acting Administrator.
    (e) Serving as Acting Administrator has no effect on the officials 
listed insubparagraphs (a) (1) through (4), above, with respect to 
their full-time position's authorities, duties and responsibilities 
(except that such official cannot both recommend and approve an 
action).

    Dated: March 17, 2011.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011-7067 Filed 3-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
§ 1.8 Notification of denial of clemency. ( a ) Whenever the President notifies the Attorney General that he has denied a request for clemency, the Attorney General shall so advise the petitioner and close the case.
( b ) Except in cases in which a sentence of death has been imposed, whenever the Attorney General recommends that the President deny a request for clemency and the President does not disapprove or take other action with respect to that adverse recommendation within 30 days after the date of its submission to him, it shall be presumed that the President concurs in that adverse recommendation of the Attorney General, and the Attorney General shall so advise the petitioner and close the case.
Docket Number FAA-2014-0589
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of Opus
Resource Group, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the
company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the company's financial condition and results of operations.

December 22, 2003


/s/ Robert P. Gordon
---------------------------------------------------
Robert P. Gordon, Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 86764 / August 26, 2019

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

FILE NO. 3-19301

____________________________________

:

In the Matter of :

:

Kendall J. Groom, CPA : ORDER APPOINTING

: TAX ADMINISTRATOR

Respondent. :

____________________________________:

By order dated February 22, 2019, the Commission issued the “Omnibus Order Directing the 

Appointment of Tax Administrator in Administrative Proceedings that Establish Distribution 

Funds” (“Omnibus Order”),1authorizing the Secretary to issue orders for calendar years 2019-2021

appointing, upon request by the Commission staff, Miller Kaplan Arase LLP (“Miller Kaplan”), a 

certified public accounting firm, with one of their offices located in San Francisco, California, as 

tax administrator (“Tax Administrator”) in administrative proceedings where the distribution fund 

may incur tax-related obligations as a Qualified Settlement Fund (“QSF”) under the Department 

of the Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(c). 

On August 26, 2019, the Commission staff requested the appointment of Miller Kaplan 

as the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Miller Kaplan, pursuant to and in accordance with the 

Omnibus Order, is appointed the Tax Administrator for the QSF in the above-referenced proceeding. 

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Vanessa A. Countryman

Secretary 

 

1

 Exchange Act Rel. No. 85174 (Feb. 22, 2019).
#### § 656.3 Policy.

Section 126(d) of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1978 declares that special effort should be made to promote commuter modes of transportation which conserve energy, reduce pollution, and reduce traffic congestion.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 359 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 359

 Authorizing the use of the atrium in the Philip A. Hart Senate Office 
Building for the National Prescription Drug Take Back Day, a semiannual 
             event for the Drug Enforcement Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 16, 2019

 Mr. Schumer (for Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mr. Blunt)) submitted 
      the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing the use of the atrium in the Philip A. Hart Senate Office 
Building for the National Prescription Drug Take Back Day, a semiannual 
             event for the Drug Enforcement Administration.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. USE OF THE ATRIUM IN THE HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING FOR 
              TAKE BACK DAY.

    (a) Authorization.--The atrium in the Philip A. Hart Senate Office 
Building is authorized to be used on October 23, 2019, for the National 
Prescription Drug Take Back Day, a semiannual event of the Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
event described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Sergeant at Arms and 
Doorkeeper of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2


The following certification  accompanies North Bay Bancorp's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q and is not filed as provided in SEC Release Nos. 33-8212, 34-47551 and
IC 25967, dated March 21, 2003.


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the  accompanying  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of North Bay
Bancorp for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, I, Terry L. Robinson,  Interim
Chief  Financial  Officer of North Bay Bancorp,  hereby  certify  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:


(1)  such  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of North Bay  Bancorp  for the quarter
     ended September 30, 2005,  fully complies with the  requirements of section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)  the  information  contained in such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of North
     Bay Bancorp for the quarter ended September 30, 2005,  fairly presents,  in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     North Bay Bancorp.


Dated:  November 14, 2005


                                          /s/ Terry L. Robinson
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         TERRY L. ROBINSON
                                         Interim Chief Financial Officer
                                         Principal Financial Officer


                                       26
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHAME ON YOU PRODUCTIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

ELIZABETH BANKS; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees. 

No. 15-56372 

D.C. No. 

2:14-cv-03512-MMM-JC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Margaret M. Morrow, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 6, 2017 

Pasadena, California

Before: PLAGER,** CLIFTON, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Shame on You Productions, Inc. (“SOYP”) appeals the district court’s order 

and judgment dismissing SOYP’s federal copyright infringement claim and 

California state law implied-in-fact contract claim. On the basis of the thorough 

and well-reasoned order of the district court, we affirm.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable S. Jay Plager, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. 

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.

FILED

MAY 3 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

AFFIRMED.
§ 924.7 Program structure. ( a ) The HSIP shall include: ( 1 ) A SHSP;
( 2 ) A Railway-Highway Crossing Program; and
( 3 ) A program of highway safety improvement projects.
( b ) The HSIP shall address all public roads in the State and include separate processes for the planning, implementation, and evaluation of the HSIP components described in paragraph (a) of this section. These processes shall be developed by the States in cooperation with the FHWA Division Administrator in accordance with this section and the requirements of 23 U.S.C. 148. Where appropriate, the processes shall be developed in consultation with other safety stakeholders and officials of the various units of local and Tribal governments.
-78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0

38.5 39.0 39.5 40.0



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/28 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 28 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
###### Editorial Note on Part 1240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1240 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10355, Mar. 3, 2003.

#### § 1240.69 Reliance on information compiled by other sources.

In determining whether an applicant is eligible for suspension of deportation or special rule cancellation of removal, the asylum officer may rely on material described in § 1208.12 of this chapter. Nothing in this subpart shall be construed to entitle the applicant to conduct discovery directed toward records, officers, agents, or employees of the Service, the Department of Justice, or the Department of State.
### §430f–1. Conveyance of lands

In order that existing roads within Shiloh National Military Park may be devoted primarily to use by park visitors and that traffic hazards and nonconforming uses may be eliminated from the park by providing a more suitable road location and related area for the highways designated State Routes Numbered 22 and 142 which now traverse the central portion of the park, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to convey certain lands within Shiloh National Military Park on the terms and conditions hereinafter provided.

(Pub. L. 85–406, §1, May 16, 1958, 72 Stat. 114.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 1240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1240 appear at 68 FR 9846, Feb. 28, 2003, and at 68 FR 10355, Mar. 3, 2003.

#### § 1240.5 Interpreter.

Any person acting as an interpreter in a hearing before an immigration judge under this part shall be sworn to interpret and translate accurately, unless the interpreter is an employee of the United States Government, in which event no such oath shall be required.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

PHILLIP L. AUSTIN, JR., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3086

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed December 21, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Mark Kiser, Judge.

Phillip L. Austin, Jr., pro se. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Michael Schaub, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, 

for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, KELLY, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
1

The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-1268

___________

Fred E. Christian, *

 *

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Stivers Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: May 20, 1999

 Filed: May 24, 1999

___________

Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. 

___________

PER CURIAM.

Fred E. Christian appeals from the district court’s1

 order dismissing his action

with prejudice. After careful review of the record we conclude briefing would serve

no useful purpose and that the appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the

judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a). 

We also deny Mr. Christian’s motion for appointment of counsel on appeal. 
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Unregistered Offerings and the 

Regulation D Exemption

Craig M. Lewis

SEC Chief Economist

Director, Division of Risk Strategy and Financial Innovation
Disclaimer

The Securities and Exchange Commission, as a matter of 

policy, disclaims responsibility for any private publication or 

statement by any of its employees. The views expressed 

herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect 

those of the Commission or of the author's colleagues upon 

the staff of the Commission.
Outline

o Aggregate capital formation

o Shift from public to private financing

o Foreign issuer use of Reg D offerings
Dominant Offering Method

o Reg D offerings surpassed debt offerings in 2010

 U.S.: $905 billion compared to $851

 Offerings in 2011 show the same trend

 Lower bound on the amount of capital raised through Reg D 

because there is no closing filing requirement
0

250

500

750

1,000

1,250

Public debt Public equity Reg D Rule 144A Reg S

2009 2010 2011Q1

Aggregate capital raised in 2009, 2010, and Q1 2011 by offering method ($billions)
Private or Public Financing

o There has been a shift from public to private capital over 

the past three years

 Public issuances fell by 11% from 2009 to 2010 

 $1,270mm to $1,133mm

 Private issuances increased by 42% over the same period

 $989mm to $1,400mm
0

250

500

750

1,000

1,250

1,500

2009 2010 2011Q1

Private Public

Aggregate capital raised in the U.S. by public and private offerings ($billions)
Important Findings

o Does Reg D meet the capital formation needs of small 

business?

 There have been a large number of smaller offerings

• 37,000 unique offerings since 2009

 The median Reg D offering is modest in size

• Approximately $1 million
Domestic vs. Foreign Issuers

o Foreign issuers access the Reg D offering market

 For the period under consideration, they account for 

approximately 25% of capital raised

o The total capital raised by foreign issuers increased by 

almost a third from 2009 to 2010

 This is consistent with the U.S. competing favorably with foreign 

markets 
0

250

500

750

1,000

1,250

1,500

1,750

2,000

2009 2010 2011Q1

Domestic Foreign

Aggregate capital raised in the U.S. by domestic and foreign issuers ($billions)
EXHIBIT 23.1









             INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM'S CONSENT
             -------------------------------------------------------



We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement of
Herley  Industries,  Inc.  on Form S-8  [File  numbers  333-145503,  333-121554,
333-71476, 333-95327, 333-46777 and 333-17369] of our report, which was based on
our audit and the report of other auditors, dated October 16, 2009, with respect
to our audits of the consolidated  financial statements and related consolidated
financial  statement schedule of Herley Industries,  Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
August 2, 2009 and August 3, 2008 and for the fifty-two  (52) weeks ended August
2, 2009, for the  fifty-three  (53) weeks ended August 3, 2008 and the fifty-two
(52)  weeks  ended July 29,  2007 and our report  dated  October  16,  2009 with
respect to our audit of the  effectiveness  of internal  control over  financial
reporting of Herley  Industries,  Inc. as of August 2, 2009,  which  reports are
included  in this  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K/A  Amendment  No.  1 of  Herley
Industries, Inc. for the fifty-two (52) weeks ended August 2, 2009.

/s/ Marcum LLP

Marcum LLP
Melville, New York
November 30, 2009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Before the 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Release No. 57606 / April 2, 2008 

Administrative Proceeding 

File No. 3-11514 

____________________________________ 

 : 

In the Matter of : 

 : 

FIDELITY NATIONAL CAPITAL : Order Approving and Ratifying 

INVESTORS, INC., : Prior Disbursement of 

 : Fair Fund 

Respondent : 

____________________________________: 

 On December 7, 2004, the Commission issued its Order Approving Plan of Fund 

Distribution and Appointing Administrator (Rel. No. 34-50801). The disgorgement and 

prejudgment interest, and civil monetary penalty totaling $125,000.00 paid by 

Respondent were held by the Commission’s Office of Financial Management in a Fair 

Fund, pursuant to Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Fair Fund”). The 

Fair Fund was fully distributed on January 31, 2005, according to the terms of the Plan 

of Distribution approved by the Order. 

 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the distribution described above is approved and 

ratified as of the day of distribution, January 31, 2005. 

 By the Commission. 

 Nancy M. Morris 

 Secretary
All PM test data from 2003 survey, ICR, Florida DEP, and PCA - Duplicates removed or multiple tests averaged

Test No. Data Source Company Location Kiln ID Raw MillOn/Off TestStart Date Wtd avg emissions (lb/tonclinker) Notes

1 PCA comments on NSPS Mitsubishi Lucerne V 1 on/off Apr02&Mar98 0.01 3 separate tests averaged

2 2003 Survey Lafarge Sugar Creek, MO Kiln Off 0.01 PCA result was incomplete; used complete test results instead

3 PCA comments on NSPS cemex xenia 1 on/off mar02 0.02

4 PCA & ICR lafarge harleyville kiln on/off oct06&Jun02 0.04 2 separate tests combined & 1 duplicate dropped

5 Florida DEP Florida Rock Industries Newberry, FL Kiln/raw mill Line 1 N.R. 7/20/2004 0.05

6 PCA comments on NSPS holcim theodore 1 on/off Jul02 0.06

7 NESHAP ICR Ash Grove Louisville, NE Kiln 2 (Humbolt) - TDF N.A. 7/13/2005 0.06

8 PCA comments on NSPS cemex louisville 1 on feb01 0.07

9 Florida DEP CEMEx Brooksville, FL Kiln #2 N.R. 3/10/2003 0.09

10 Florida DEP CEMEX Brooksville, FL Kiln #1 N.R. 12/13/2006 0.09

11 PCA comments on NSPS holcim florence 1 on/off Oct02&Jun03 0.09 2 separate tests combined

12 2003 Survey Mountain Laramie, WY Kiln #1 (April 2002) N.R. 0.10

13 NESHAP ICR Lehigh Glen Falls, NY Kiln On 2/22/2006 0.11

14 ICR Ash Grove Louisville, NE Kiln 1(ACL) Dec-90 0.12

15 2003 Survey Illinois LaSalle, IL Kiln On 0.14

16 PCA comments on NSPS Monarch Humbold 5 on/off jun04&Aug02 0.14 2 separate tests combined

17 PCA comments on NSPS GCC Rio G Tijeras 2 NA dec02 0.15

18 ICR Lone Star Ogelsby, IL Kiln Nov-99 0.16

19 NESHAP ICR Lehigh Mitchell, IN Kiln 1(after modification) N.A. 12/16/2003 0.23

20 PCA comments on NSPS GCC Rio G Tijeras 1 NA dec02 0.25

21 PCA comments on NSPS Monarch Humbold 4 NA Aug02 0.28

22 PCA & ICR lafarge joppa 2 NA nov04&9/25/2002 0.41 2 separate tests combined

23 2003 Survey Mountain Laramie, WY Kiln #2, Mill On 4/1/2002 0.42

24 PCA comments on NSPS lehigh mitchell 3 NA dec02 0.45

25 ICR Lone Star Pryor Kiln 3 Feb-97 1.05

26 ICR Lone Star Pryor Kiln 1 Feb-97 1.29

27 ICR Lone Star Pryor Kiln 2 Feb-97 1.29

28 ICR Ash Grove Seattle, WA Kiln Jul-92 1.44