alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of Hawkins, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended April 3, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R. Hawkins, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| /s/ John R. Hawkins      |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| John  R. Hawkins         |
| Chief  Executive Officer |
| July 1,  2005       |

 

1

----
Date

Total 

Particulate 

Conc.

(grains per 

SCF)

Total 

Particulate 

Emission 

(lbs/hr)

Total 

Fluoride 

Emission 

(lbs/hr)

Total 

Fluoride

Conc. 

(grains per 

SCF)

Total 

Secondary 

Fluoride 

Emission 

(lbs/ton)

Total Primary 

and 

Secondary 

Fluoride 

Emission 

(lbs/ton)

Summary of Results

Method 14 Testing Performed During 2010

Annual Particulate and Monthly Total Fluoride Results

Total 

Primary 

Emission 

(lbs/ton)

Line

Avg. 

Aluminum 

Production 

Rate 

(tons/hr)

Method

1 January 14 10.49 0.000393 18.50 1.8 0.057 1.8

1 February 14 10.46 0.000344 17.53 1.7 0.057 1.7

1 March 14 10.12 0.000286 16.99 1.7 0.043 1.7

1 April 14 10.08 0.000316 18.59 1.8 0.043 1.9

1 May 14 9.98 0.000278 18.73 1.9 0.043 1.9

1 June 14 9.38 0.000477 28.32 3.0 0.043 3.1

1 July 14 9.45 0.000212 15.62 1.7 0.043 1.7

1 August 14 9.52 0.000343 20.01 2.1 0.043 2.1

1 September 14 10.27 0.000161 10.78 1.0 0.043 1.1

1 October 14 10.00 0.000156 10.37 1.0 0.043 1.1

1 November 5 & 14 10.65 0.0009 0.000194 12.11 54.76 1.1 0.043 1.2

1 December 14 10.73 0.000302 16.54 1.5 0.043 1.6

2 January 14 10.31 0.000385 17.97 1.7 0.049 1.8

2 February 14 10.33 0.000248 12.85 1.2 0.049 1.3

2 March 14 10.30 0.000165 9.19 0.9 0.049 0.9

2 April 14 10.33 0.000146 8.79 0.9 0.049 0.9

2 May 14 10.22 0.000194 14.64 1.4 0.049 1.5

2 June 14 10.22 0.000248 18.15 1.8 0.049 1.8

2 July 14 10.52 0.000290 19.42 1.8 0.049 1.9

2 August 14 10.36 0.000201 12.39 1.2 0.049 1.2

2 September 14 10.48 0.000223 12.22 1.2 0.049 1.2

2 October 14 10.34 0.000176 11.14 1.1 0.049 1.1

2 November 5 & 14 10.38 0.0005 0.000182 9.88 25.04 1.0 0.049 1.0

2 December 14 10.30 0.000235 12.64 1.2 0.083 1.3

3 East June 14 5.93 0.000300 9.09 1.5 0.030 1.6

3 East July 14 6.05 0.000233 6.59 1.1 0.030 1.1

3 East August 14 6.07 0.000340 10.73 1.8 0.030 1.8

3 East September 14 6.10 0.000294 8.62 1.4 0.030 1.4

3 East October 14 6.03 0.000251 7.50 1.2 0.030 1.3

3 East November 14 6.18 0.000217 7.39 1.2 0.036 1.2

3 East December 5 & 14 6.17 0.0008 0.000375 9.01 19.48 1.5 0.036 1.5

3 West April 14 6.00 0.000162 5.12 0.9 0.042 0.9

3 West May 14 5.88 0.000236 7.11 1.2 0.042 1.3

3 West June 14 5.93 0.000300 9.50 1.6 0.051 1.7

Page 1 of 2
Date

Total 

Particulate 

Conc.

(grains per 

SCF)

Total 

Particulate 

Emission 

(lbs/hr)

Total 

Fluoride 

Emission 

(lbs/hr)

Total 

Fluoride

Conc. 

(grains per 

SCF)

Total 

Secondary 

Fluoride 

Emission 

(lbs/ton)

Total Primary 

and 

Secondary 

Fluoride 

Emission 

(lbs/ton)

Summary of Results

Method 14 Testing Performed During 2010

Annual Particulate and Monthly Total Fluoride Results

Total 

Primary 

Emission 

(lbs/ton)

Line

Avg. 

Aluminum 

Production 

Rate 

(tons/hr)

Method

3 West July 14 6.05 0.000261 8.49 1.4 0.051 1.5

3 West August 14 6.07 0.000289 10.33 1.7 0.051 1.8

3 West September 14 6.10 0.000206 7.01 1.1 0.051 1.2

3 West October 14 6.03 0.000233 8.92 1.5 0.051 1.5

3 West November 14 6.18 0.000230 8.33 1.3 0.051 1.4

3 West December 5 & 14 6.17 0.0006 0.000240 6.87 21.95 1.1 0.051 1.2

Page 2 of 2
### §667f–1. Requisition of grain to prevent crop depredation by migratory waterfowl

Upon a finding by the Secretary of the Interior that any area in the United States is threatened with damage to farmers' crops by migratory waterfowl, whether or not during the open season for such migratory waterfowl, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized and directed to requisition from the Commodity Credit Corporation and to make available to Federal, State, or local governmental bodies or officials, or to private organizations or persons, such grain acquired by the Commodity Credit Corporation through price-support operations in such quantities and subject to such regulations as the Secretary determines will most effectively lure migratory waterfowl away from crop depredations and at the same time not expose such migratory waterfowl to shooting over areas to which the waterfowl have been lured by such feeding programs.

(July 3, 1956, ch. 512, §2, 70 Stat. 492.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 443 of Title 7, Agriculture, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
§ 101.104 Final decisions. ( a ) Where the hearing is conducted by a hearing examiner who makes an initial decision, if no exceptions thereto are filed within the 20-day period specified in § 101.103, such decision shall become the final decision of the Department, and shall constitute “final agency action” within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 704 (formerly section 10(c) of the Administrative Procedure Act), subject to the provisions of § 101.106.
( b ) Where the hearing is conducted by a hearing examiner who makes a recommended decision, or upon the filing of exceptions to a hearing examiner's initial decision, the reviewing authority shall review the recommended or initial decision and shall issue its own decision thereon, which shall become the final decision of the Department, and shall constitute “final agency action” within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 704 (formerly section 10(c) of the Administrative Procedure Act), subject to the provisions of § 101.106.
( c ) All final decisions shall be promptly served on all parties, and amici, if any.
# Official Journal C 321E/28 D

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 321E |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4728 December 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 321E

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4728 December 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Council |
| 2004/C 321E/1 | Common position (EC) No 28/2004 of 21 October 2004 adopted by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, with a view to adopting a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on a single Community framework for the transparency of qualifications and competences (Europass) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Council

2004/C 321E/1

Common position (EC) No 28/2004 of 21 October 2004 adopted by the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, with a view to adopting a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on a single Community framework for the transparency of qualifications and competences (Europass)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Wiley W. Mills, Administrator, Appellee, v. The City of Chicago, Appellant.

Gen. No. 15,496.

*Instructions—when in action for death caused by wrongful act erroneous.*An instruction upon the question of damages in such an action is erroneous if it does not limit the jury to damages to the pecuniary loss sustained to the next of kin.

Action in case for death caused by alleged wrongful act. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. James Craig, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1909. Reversed.

Opinion filed January 23, 1911.

Rehearing denied February 6, 1911.

Edward J. Brundage and John R. Caverly, for appellant; James E. Purnell, of counsel.

Wiley W. Mills, Walter S. Garr, Ross C. Hall and William H. Holly, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

In an action on the case for wrongful death plaintiff had judgment for $7,500 and the defendant appealed. The only instruction given on the subject of damages was this instruction, given for the plaintiff:

> “If you find the defendant guilty, then the plaintiff is entitled to recover such damages as will compensate deceased’s wife and children for whatever damages they have sustained on account of his death. And in estimating such damages, in case you find the defendant guilty, you may take into consideration the age of the said Otto Winter at the time of his decease, his business capacity, disposition to labor and habits of living, in so far as the same are shown by the evicLghcg. ? *

In P. C. C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Gates, 137 Ill. App. 309, the court instructed the jury that they might make an estimate of the damages “from the facts and circum*473stances in proof and by considering them in connection with their own knowledge, observation and experience in the business affairs of life.” The instruction was held erroneous because it did not limit the damages to the pecuniary loss sustained by the next of kin of plaintiff’s intestate. In the opinion the reasons for the conclusion reached are stated and the authorities cited. We see no reason to change or modify the views so expressed.

The instruction in question does not limit the damages to the pecuniary loss sustained by the wife and children of the deceased, and appellant in this case, as in that, assigned as ground for new trial and as error, that the damages were excessive.

We think that the giving of said instruction was reversible error, and for such error the judgment will be reversed.

*Reversed.*
#### § 750.701 Purpose.

This subpart prescribes the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) policies and requirements relating to the effective control of outdoor advertising under 23 U.S.C. 131. The purpose of these policies and requirements is to assure that there is effective State control of outdoor advertising in areas adjacent to Interstate and Federal-aid primary highways. Nothing in this subpart shall be construed to prevent a State from establishing more stringent outdoor advertising control requirements along Interstate and Primary Systems than provided herein.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and (b))



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby individually certifies in his capacity as an officer of USI Holdings Corporation (the Company) that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of and for the periods covered by such Report.



|                        |                        
|----------------------- | -----------------------
|Dated: November 9, 2005 | /s/ DAVIDL. ESLICK     
|                        | David L. Eslick        
|                        | Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §1350(a) and (b)) and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by the above signatory to the extent of his respective knowledge.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to USI Holdings Corporation and will be retained by USI Holdings Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### Coal Geology of the Seitz Quadrangle, Breathitt, Magoffin, Morgan, and Wolfe Counties, Kentucky

By: M.J. Bergin

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1122C

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report** 
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
EXHIBIT 11
                               EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Basic and diluted earnings per share were computed as follows:
(In thousands, except per share data)

                                                     Three Months Ended       Six Months Ended
                                                          March 31,               March 31,
                                                     ------------------      ------------------
                                                      2001        2000        2001        2000
                                                     ------     -------      ------      ------
<S>                                                  <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Net income                                           $  227      $  201      $  380      $  350
Weighted average common shares outstanding            2,203       2,196       2,202       2,240
Basic earnings per share                             $ 0.10      $ 0.09      $ 0.17      $ 0.16

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Net income                                           $  227      $  201      $  380      $  350
Weighted average common shares outstanding            2,203       2,196       2,202       2,240
Additional potentially dilutive securities
   (equivalent in common stock)
      Stock options                                       9          --           7          --
                                                     ------      ------      ------      ------
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding    2,212       2,196       2,209       2,290

Diluted earnings per share                           $ 0.10      $ 0.09      $ 0.17      $ 0.16
</TABLE>

                                       19
#### § 245.20 [Reserved]
CORPORATE RESOLUTION

OF

VALLEY GREEN LANDSCAPING, INC.

We, the undersigned, being all the Directors and Shareholders of Valley Green Landscaping, Inc.,

organized and existing under the laws of Virginia, and having its principal place of business at 5833

Lewis Lane, Falls Church, Virginia 22041(the "Corporation"), hereby certify that the following is a

true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted at a meeting of the Directors and Shareholders

of the Corporation duly held and convened on April 06,2018, at which a quorum of the Board of

Directors was present and voting throughout, and that such resolution has not been modifled,

rescinded or revoked, and is at present in fulI force and effect:

Therefore, it is resolved:

"Whereas, it is in the best interest of this corporation to file a voluntary petition in the United States

Bankruptcy Court pursuant to Chapter 11 of Title l1 of the United States Code;

Be It Therefore Resolved, that David Sheppard, Owner/President of this Corporation, is

authorized and directed to execute and deliver all documents necessary to perfect the filing of a

chapter 11 voluntary bankruptcy case on behalf of the corporation; and

Be It Further Resolved, that David Sheppard, Owner/President of this Corporation is authorized

and directed to appear in all bankruptcy proceedings on behalf of the corporation, and to

otherwise do and perform all acts and deeds and to execute and deliver all necessary documents

on behalf of the corporation in connection with such bankruptcy case, and

Be It Further Resolved, that David Sheppard, Owner/President of this Corporation is authorized

and directed to employ Ashvin Pandurangi 86966, attorney and the law firm of AP Law Group,

PLC to represent the corporation in such bankruptcy case."

By affirmative votes noted as signatures below, a majority vote of the Members of Valley Green

Landscaping, Inc. with authority to bind the Company approves the form and content of this

resolution, to be effective immediately.

DIRECTORS

\\

,.'.,\ \ r

)

4. {, - ?-rJ\d

David Sheppard Drt.

President

SHAREHOLDERS

Page 1 of2

Case 18-11216-BFK Doc 26 Filed 05/10/18 Entered 05/10/18 09:02:45 Desc Main

 Document Page 1 of 2
David Sheppard

Owner

Circle this L.S. as there is no corporate seal.

CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY

The Secretary of the Corporation hereby certifies that he/she is the duly elected and qualified

Secretary of Valley Green Landscaping, Inc. and certifies that the above is a true and correct

record of the resolution that was duly adopted by the Directors and Shareholders of the

Corporation on April 06, 2018.

This is a Rocketlawyer.com document. Page 2 of 2

Case 18-11216-BFK Doc 26 Filed 05/10/18 Entered 05/10/18 09:02:45 Desc Main

 Document Page 2 of 2
§ 656.7 Determination of an exception. ( a ) The FHWA has determined under provisions of 23 U.S.C. 146(b) that an exceptional situation exists in regard to the funding of carpools so as to allow the State to contribute as its share of the non-Federal match essential project-related work and services performed by local agencies and private organizations when approved and authorized in accordance with regular Federal-aid procedures. The cost of such work must be properly valued, supportable and verifiable in order for inclusion as an eligible project cost. Examples of such contributed work and services include: public service announcements, computer services, and project-related staff time for administration by employees of public and private organizations.
( b ) This determination is based on: ( 1 ) The nature of carpool projects to provide a variety of services to the public;
( 2 ) the fact that carpool projects are labor intensive and require professional and specialized technical skills;
( 3 ) the extensive use of joint public and private endeavors; and
( 4 ) the fact that project costs involve the acquisition of capital equipment as opposed to construction of fixed items.
( c ) This exception is limited to carpool projects and therefore is not applicable to other Federal-aid projects. The exception does not affect or replace the standard Federal-aid funding procedures or real property acquisition procedures and requirements, part 712, The Acquisition Function.
### §202. Control; rules and regulations; fish and game; leases; automobiles; stock grazing

Lassen Volcanic National Park shall be under the exclusive control of the Secretary of the Interior, whose duty it shall be, as soon as practicable, to make and publish such rules and regulations not inconsistent with the laws of the United States as he may deem necessary or proper for the care, protection, management, and improvement of the same. Such regulations being primarily aimed at the freest use of the said park for recreation purposes by the public and for the preservation from injury or spoliation of all timber, mineral deposits, and natural curiosities or wonders within said park and their retention in their natural condition as far as practicable and for the preservation of the park in a state of nature so far as is consistent with the purposes of this section and sections 201 and 203 of this title. He shall provide against the wanton destruction of the fish and game found within said park and against their capture or destruction for purposes of merchandise or profit, and generally shall be authorized to take all such measures as shall be necessary to fully carry out the objects and purposes of this section and sections 201 and 203 of this title. Said Secretary may, in his discretion, execute leases to parcels of ground not exceeding ten acres in extent at any one place to any one person or persons or company for not to exceed twenty years when such ground is necessary for the erection of buildings for the accommodation of visitors and to parcels of ground not exceeding one acre in extent and for not to exceed twenty years to persons who have heretofore erected, or whom he may hereafter authorize to erect, summer homes or cottages. Such leases or privileges may be renewed or extended at the expiration of the terms thereof. No exclusive privilege, however, shall be granted within the park except upon the ground leased. The regulations governing the park shall include provisions for the use of automobiles therein and the reasonable grazing of stock.

(Aug. 9, 1916, ch. 302, §2, 39 Stat. 444.)