alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4751 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of the 

Treasury to regulate tax return preparers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 18, 2019 

Mr. COHEN (for himself, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY

of New York, Ms. TLAIB, and Mr. CARSON of Indiana) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to direct the 

Secretary of the Treasury to regulate tax return preparers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tax Return Preparer 

5 Accountability Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4751 IH

1 SEC. 2. REGULATION OF TAX RETURN PREPARERS WHO 

2 ARE NOT REPRESENTATIVES PRACTICING 

3 BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREAS4 URY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 3 of title 

6 31, United States Code, is amended by inserting after sec7 tion 330 the following new section: 

8 ‘‘§ 330A. Tax return preparers who are not represent9 atives practicing before the Department 

10 of the Treasury 

11 ‘‘(a) The Secretary of the Treasury shall, under regu12 lations prescribed by the Secretary, regulate any tax re13 turn preparers who are not regulated by the Secretary 

14 under section 330. 

15 ‘‘(b)(1) The Secretary may impose a penalty of 

16 $1,000 for each Federal tax return, document, or other 

17 submission prepared by a tax return preparer during a 

18 period in which the tax return preparer— 

19 ‘‘(A) is not in compliance with the regulations 

20 promulgated under this section, or 

21 ‘‘(B) is suspended or disbarred from acting as 

22 a tax return preparer under such regulations. 

23 Any penalty imposed under the preceding sentence shall 

24 be in addition to any other penalty which may be imposed. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4751 IH

1 ‘‘(2) No penalty may be imposed under paragraph (1) 

2 with respect to any failure if it is shown that such failure 

3 is due to reasonable cause. 

4 ‘‘(c) For purposes of this section: 

5 ‘‘(1) The term ‘tax return preparer’ has the 

6 meaning given by section 7701(a)(36) of the Inter7 nal Revenue Code of 1986. 

8 ‘‘(2) The terms ‘Secretary of the Treasury’ and 

9 ‘Secretary’ mean the Secretary of the Treasury or 

10 the delegate of the Secretary.’’. 

11 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

12 for subchapter II of chapter 3 of title 31, United States 

13 Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to 

14 section 330 the following new item: 

‘‘330A. Tax return preparers who are not representatives practicing before the 

Department of the Treasury.’’. 

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this section shall apply with respect to returns prepared 

17 for taxable years ending after the date of the enactment 

18 of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
### §695d. Development of water supplies for waterfowl management in California; reauthorization of Central Valley Project

The entire Central Valley project, California, heretofore authorized under the Act of August 26, 1937 (50 Stat. 844, 850), and reauthorized under the Act of October 17, 1940 (54 Stat. 1198, 1199), the Act of October 14, 1949 (63 Stat. 852), and the Act of September 26, 1950 (64 Stat. 1036), is reauthorized and declared to be for the purposes set forth in said Acts, and also for the use of the waters thereof for fish and wildlife purposes, subject to such priorities as are applicable under said Acts.

(Aug. 27, 1954, ch. 1012, §1, 68 Stat. 879.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of August 26, 1937 (50 Stat. 844, 850), Act of October 17, 1940 (54 Stat. 1198, 1199), Act of October 14, 1949 (63 Stat. 852), and Act of September 26, 1950 (64 Stat. 1036), referred to in text, are acts Aug. 26, 1937, ch. 832, 50 Stat. 844; Oct. 17, 1940, ch. 895, 54 Stat. 1198; Oct. 14, 1949, ch. 690, 63 Stat. 852; Sept. 26, 1950, ch. 1047, 64 Stat. 1036, which were not classified to the Code.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-10047

No. 95-10076 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

HECTOR ALFREDO MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

* * * * * * * * *

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

JAIRO MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Northern District of Texas

(3:94-CR-043-R)

May 21, 1996

Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

2 Per curiam: *

Appellants Jairo Martinez and Hector Martinez challenge their

convictions based the district court's re fusal to allow them to

withdraw their guilty pleas at the sentencing hearing. We affirm.

Hector Martinez argues that the di strict court should have

allowed him to withdraw his plea of guilty because he repudiated

the plea before it was formally accepted by the district court. He

did not make this argument before the district court. Hector

Martinez sought to withdraw his plea to misprision of a felony on

the ground he had not engaged in the related conspiracy. We find

no plain error in the district court's refusal to allow appellant

to withdraw his plea. S ee United States v. Calverly

, 37 F.3d 160,

162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc), cert. denied

, 115 S. Ct. 1266

(1995).

Jairo Martinez ar gues that the district court should have

allowed him to withdraw his plea of guilty because his counsel

failed to advise himthat an amendment to the sentencing

guidelines, which became effective after he entered his plea, made

his plea bargain less desirable. Unlike Hector Martinez, Jairo

Martinez addressed his claim to the district court. When, as here,

a defendant is aware of his potential prison term, his plea is not

involuntary simply because he misunderstands the Sentencing

Guidelines ' effect upon the computation of his sentence. U nited

States v. Young , 981 F.2d 180, 184 (5th Cir. 1992), cert. denied

,

113 S. Ct. 2454, 2983 (1993). We find no abuse of discretion in

the district court's denial of Jairo Martinez's motion to withdraw

his plea.

Finally, Jairo Martinez argues that double jeopardy bars his3

prosecution because he stipulated to a forfeiture pursuan t to 21

U.S.C. § 881(a)(6). This contention is without merit. S ee United

States v. Tilley

, 18 F.3d 1295 (5th Cir.), cert. denied

, 115 S. Ct.

573 (1994).

For the foregoing reasons, the convictions of Hector Martinez

and Jairo Martinez are AFFIRMED.
AGREEMENT TO EXTEND REPAYMENT OBLIGATION

     This  Agreement  to Extend  Repayment  Obligation  (this  "Agreement"),  is
entered by and  between  Power  Exploration,  Inc.,  a Nevada  corporation  (the
"Borrower"),  and Trident III, LLC, a Cayman limited liability company (the
"Lender"),  as of May 1, 1999.  Reference is made to the 10% Promissory  Note
dated October 21, 1998 made by the Borrower to the Lender (the "Note").

WHEREAS, under the terms of the Notes the Lender has the right to be repaid all
indebtedness due under the Notes as of March 15, 1999; and

Whereas,  the  lender  has  agreed  to delay the  effectiveness  of its right to
repayment until September 30, 1999;

1.   The  Lender  hereby  agrees to  delay  the  effectiveness  of its  right to
     repayment under the Note (the "Repayment  Obligation")  until September 30,
     1999;

2.   In consideration of Lender's agreement to delay the effectiveness of the
     Repayment  Obligation  Borrower  shall  issue to  Lender  40,000  shares of
     Borrower's common stock ("Borrower  Stock"),  for the two subsequent months
     that the Note is extended  from March 15, 1999.  (The period from March 16,
     1999  through may 15,  1999 i.e.,  40,000  shares has already  been paid to
     Trident III,  LLC).  the Borrower  shall issue to Lender  220,000 shares of
     Borrower Stock,  for the extension from May 16, 1999 to September 30, 1999.
     The  220,000  shares are to be issued no later  than July 1,  1999.  If the
     Borrower  fails to repay  the note on or before  September  30,  1999,  the
     Borrower  shall  issue the  Lender  50,000  shares per day that the Note is
     outstanding subsequent to September, 1999.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned authorized officers of the parties have
executed this Agreement as of the date first set forth above.

     TRIDENT III, LLC                        POWER EXPLORATION, INC.



By:  /s/ Jeffrey W. Tomz                     By:  /s/ Mark Zouvas
   ----------------------                       --------------------
Name:  Jeffrey W. Tomz                       Name:  Mark Zouvas
Title:  Director                             Title:  CFO


                                       32
### §666f. Wildlife conservation and agricultural, industrial, recreational, and related uses for certain Federal lands; transfer of lands to Secretary of the Interior; administration, development, and disposition

In order to promote the orderly development and use of the lands and interests therein acquired by the United States in connection with the Crab Orchard Creek project and the Illinois Ordnance Plant in Williamson, Jackson, and Union Counties, Illinois, consistent with the needs of agriculture, industry, recreation, and wildlife conservation, all of the interests of the United States in and to such lands are hereby transferred to the Secretary of the Interior for administration, development, and disposition, in accordance with the provisions of this section and section 666g of this title.

(Aug. 5, 1947, ch. 489, §1, 61 Stat. 770.)
EXHIBIT31.2





RULE
13A-14(A)/15D-14(A) CERTIFICATION





I, Ciaran
Egan, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FreeStar Technology
Corporation;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omitted pursuant to extended compliance period] for
the registrant and have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
[omitted pursuant to extended compliance period]





(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.





FREESTAR TECHNOLOGY
      CORPORATIONDate:  November
      19, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Ciaran
      EganCiaran
      EganSecretary/Treasurer/Chief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
### §408f. Former Siskiwit Islands Bird Reservation

The Siskiwit Islands Bird Reservation is abolished and shall after March 6, 1942, be a part of the Isle Royale National Park.

(Mar. 6, 1942, ch. 152, §2, 56 Stat. 138.)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Micro Laboratories, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Robert Thistle, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

/s/Robert Thistle
-----------------------------
Robert Thistle
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer

November 3, 2003
#### § 750.712 Reclassification of signs.

Any sign lawfully erected after the effective date of a State outdoor advertising control law which is reclassified from legal-conforming to nonconforming and subject to removal under revised State statutes or regulations and policy pursuant to this regulation is eligible for Federal participation in just compensation payments and other eligible costs.
### §670n. Repealed. Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title III, §312(d), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1355

Section, Pub. L. 86–797, title II, §208, as added Pub. L. 93–452, §2, Oct. 18, 1974, 88 Stat. 1374, related to the jurisdiction, authority, duties, or activities of the Joint Federal-State Land Use Planning Commission.
EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We  consent  to  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  following   Registration
Statements  under the  Securities  Act of 1933 as filed by  AdZone  Interactive,
Inc.:

Form S-8, dated January 28, 2002        SEC File No. 333-81498
Form S-8, dated February 21, 2002       SEC File No. 333-83130
Form S-8, dated December 9, 2002        SEC File No. 333-98289

of our independent accountant's review report, dated February 10, 2003, relating
to the balance sheets of AdZone  Research,  Inc. (a Delaware  corporation  and a
development stage company) (SEC File No. 0-28717,  CIK # 1102013) as of December
31, 2002 and 2001 and the related  statements  of operations  and  comprehensive
loss for the nine and three months ended  December 31, 2002 and 2001 and for the
period from  February 28, 2000 (date of  inception)  through  December 31, 2002,
respectively;  the related statement of changes in shareholders'  equity for the
period from February 28, 2000 (date of inception) through December 31, 2002; and
the related statements of cash flows for the nine months ended December 31, 2002
and 2001 and for the period from February 28, 2000 (date of  inception)  through
December 31, 2002,  respectively,  which report has been submitted to management
as it relates to the December 31, 2002 Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of AdZone
Research, Inc.

                                       /s/ S. W. Hatfield, CPA
                                       -----------------------------
                                       S. W. HATFIELD, CPA
Dallas, Texas
February 10, 2003
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Henry Torson, Appellant.

Criminal *law—when imposition of fine unauthorised hy court.*Upon the trial of a criminal case in the circuit court on appeal from a justice of the peace, where the jury finds the defendant guilty they are required to fix the amount of the fine, and the court is without authority so to do.

Action commenced before justice of the peace. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Christian county; the Hon. A. M. Rose, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the May term, 1909.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed March 30, 1910.

Hogah & Wallace, for appellant.

*34No appearance for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Baume

delivered the opinion of the court.

On a trial before a justice of the peace the defendant was found guilty by a jury of unlawfully keeping open a tippling house, or other place where liquor was-sold or given away, on the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday, contrary to the form of the statute, etc., and his fine was fixed by the jury at' $30. From the judgment entered upon such verdict defendant prayed an appeal to the circuit court where upon a trial by jury he was found guilty in manner and form as charged in the complaint, and thereafter the defendant was sentenced by the court to pay a fine of $25, together with the costs of prosecution. Defendant prosecutes a further appeal to this court. No brief has been filed by the prosecution.

Waiving all other questions in the case, which questions we do not deem it necessary to discuss, the judgment must be reversed because of the action of - the trial court in refusing to permit the jury to fix the fine, and in fixing the fine upon the verdict, finding the defendant guilty. Upon a trial of a criminal case in the circuit court on appeal from a justice of the peace, where the jury finds the defendant guilty they are required to fix the amount of the fine, and the court is without authority so to do. Rev. Stat. 1908, chap. 79, par. 174; Summers v. The People, 29 Ill. App. 170; Holland v. The People, 132 Ill. App. 449.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

*jReversed and remanded.*
### §698u–7. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Department of the Interior such sums as are necessary to carry out sections 698u to 698u–7 of this title.

(Pub. L. 104–333, div. I, title X, §1009, Nov. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 4209.)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940

Release No. 35149 / February 27, 2024 

In the Matter of:

Diameter Credit Company

Diameter Principal Finance LLC

Diameter Principal Finance Partnership LP

Diameter Capital Partners LP

Diameter CLO Advisors LLC

Diameter Master Fund LP

Diameter Dislocation Master Fund LP

Diameter Dislocation Master Fund II LP

DCMALT LP

DCP IG Fund LP

Diameter Credit Funding I, Ltd.

Diameter Credit Funding II, Ltd.

Diameter Credit Funding III, Ltd.

Diameter Credit Funding IV, Ltd.

Diameter Capital CLO 1 Ltd.

Diameter Capital CLO 2 Ltd.

Diameter Capital CLO 3 Ltd.

Diameter Capital CLO 4 Ltd.

Diameter Capital CLO 5 Ltd.

55 Hudson Yards, 29th Floor

New York, NY 10001

812-15490

ORDER UNDER SECTIONS 17(d) and 57(i) OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 

1940 AND RULE 17d-1 UNDER THE ACT

Diameter Credit Company, et al. filed an application on July 25, 2023, and an amendment to the 

application on October 31, 2023, requesting an order under sections 17(d) and 57(i) of the 

Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”) and rule 17d-1 under the Act that would permit 

certain joint transactions otherwise prohibited by sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) of the Act and rule 

17d-1 under the Act. The order would permit certain business development companies and 

closed-end management investment companies (collectively, the “Regulated Funds”) to co-invest 

in portfolio companies with each other and with certain affiliated investment entities.
2

On February 1, 2024, a notice of the filing of the application was issued (Investment Company 

Act Release No. 35122). The notice gave interested persons an opportunity to request a hearing 

and stated that an order disposing of the application would be issued unless a hearing was 

ordered. No request for a hearing has been filed, and the Commission has not ordered a hearing.

The matter has been considered and it is found, on the basis of the information set forth in the 

application, as amended, that participation by the Regulated Funds in the proposed transactions 

is consistent with the provisions, policies and purposes of the Act and is on a basis no less 

advantageous than that of other participants. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED, under sections 17(d) and 57(i) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act, that 

the relief requested by Diameter Credit Company, et al. (File No. 812-15490) is granted, 

effective immediately, subject to the conditions contained in the application, as amended.

For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, under delegated authority.

Sherry R. Haywood,

Assistant Secretary.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**OFFICER’S      SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

|   | (i) | The                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended                September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section                13(a)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,                and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | The                information contained in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for                the nine months ended September 30, 2005, fairly presents in all                material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company, at and for the periods                indicated. |
|--------|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                November 14, 2005 | /s/                Steven A. Abney              |
|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | Steven                A. Abney                                      |
|                                   | Executive                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                   | (Principal                Financial and Accounting Officer and      |
|                                   | Acting                Principal Executive Officer)                  |